SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
ý |
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
For the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
OR |
|
|
|
o |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
For the Transition Period from to |
|
|
|
Commission File Number 000-50404 |
LKQ CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE |
|
36-4215970 |
(State or
other jurisdiction of |
|
(I.R.S.
Employer |
|
|
|
120 NORTH LASALLE STREET, SUITE 3300, CHICAGO, IL |
|
60602 |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
|
|
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (312) 621-1950 |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes ý No o
At May 4, 2005, the registrant had issued and outstanding an aggregate of 20,731,956 shares of Common Stock.
PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
LKQ CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
( In thousands, except share data )
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and equivalents |
|
$ |
3,730 |
|
$ |
1,612 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
467 |
|
|
|
||
Receivables, net |
|
30,284 |
|
28,305 |
|
||
Inventory |
|
80,040 |
|
74,150 |
|
||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
3,370 |
|
3,375 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total Current Assets |
|
117,891 |
|
107,442 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Property and Equipment, net |
|
72,135 |
|
70,730 |
|
||
Intangibles, net |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Goodwill |
|
112,655 |
|
100,319 |
|
||
Other intangibles, net |
|
91 |
|
45 |
|
||
Deferred Income Taxes |
|
4,145 |
|
4,621 |
|
||
Other Assets |
|
5,742 |
|
5,118 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total Assets |
|
$ |
312,659 |
|
$ |
288,275 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
9,651 |
|
$ |
8,424 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
4,631 |
|
1,251 |
|
||
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
|
20,989 |
|
19,571 |
|
||
Current portion of long-term obligations |
|
220 |
|
317 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total Current Liabilities |
|
35,491 |
|
29,563 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Long-Term Obligations, Excluding Current Portion |
|
58,889 |
|
49,945 |
|
||
Other Noncurrent Liabilities |
|
4,088 |
|
4,079 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Redeemable Common Stock, $0.01 par value, 50,000 shares issued |
|
617 |
|
617 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Commitments and Contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Stockholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized, 20,652,823 and 20,565,413 shares issued at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively. |
|
207 |
|
206 |
|
||
Additional paid-in capital |
|
202,590 |
|
201,484 |
|
||
Warrants |
|
261 |
|
261 |
|
||
Retained earnings |
|
9,541 |
|
1,140 |
|
||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
975 |
|
980 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total Stockholders Equity |
|
213,574 |
|
204,071 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
$ |
312,659 |
|
$ |
288,275 |
|
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
LKQ CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations
( In thousands, except per share data )
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
March 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Revenue |
|
$ |
133,807 |
|
$ |
100,073 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cost of goods sold |
|
71,171 |
|
53,077 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Gross margin |
|
62,636 |
|
46,996 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Facility and warehouse expenses |
|
14,454 |
|
10,728 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Distribution expenses |
|
14,095 |
|
10,694 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
17,725 |
|
14,207 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
1,966 |
|
1,505 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Operating income |
|
14,396 |
|
9,862 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Other (income) expense |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Interest expense |
|
572 |
|
537 |
|
||
Interest income |
|
(18 |
) |
(18 |
) |
||
Other (income) expense, net |
|
(162 |
) |
(87 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total other expense |
|
392 |
|
432 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Income before provision for income taxes |
|
14,004 |
|
9,430 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Provision for income taxes |
|
5,603 |
|
3,795 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net income |
|
$ |
8,401 |
|
$ |
5,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Basic |
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Weighted average common shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Basic |
|
20,631 |
|
19,643 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Diluted |
|
22,692 |
|
22,181 |
|
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
LKQ CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
( In thousands )
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
March 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net income |
|
$ |
8,401 |
|
$ |
5,635 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
1,966 |
|
1,505 |
|
||
Deferred income taxes |
|
383 |
|
705 |
|
||
Writeoff of debt issuance costs |
|
|
|
346 |
|
||
Other adjustments |
|
18 |
|
(47 |
) |
||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects from purchase transactions: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Receivables |
|
(1,154 |
) |
(313 |
) |
||
Inventory |
|
(1,613 |
) |
(4,368 |
) |
||
Income taxes payable |
|
3,806 |
|
2,081 |
|
||
Other operating assets and liabilities |
|
(496 |
) |
318 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
11,311 |
|
5,862 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Purchases of property and equipment, net |
|
(2,953 |
) |
(6,649 |
) |
||
Purchase of investment securities |
|
|
|
(650 |
) |
||
Decrease in restricted cash in escrow |
|
132 |
|
|
|
||
Cash used in acquisitions |
|
(15,815 |
) |
(39,638 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
(18,636 |
) |
(46,937 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Proceeds from the sale of common stock and warrant exercises |
|
639 |
|
1,847 |
|
||
Debt issuance costs |
|
(43 |
) |
(237 |
) |
||
Net borrowings of long-term debt |
|
8,847 |
|
27,065 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
9,443 |
|
28,675 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and equivalents |
|
2,118 |
|
(12,400 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and equivalents, beginning of period |
|
1,612 |
|
16,082 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
3,730 |
|
$ |
3,682 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Notes issued in connection with business acquisitions |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
2,250 |
|
Stock issued in connection with business acquisitions |
|
|
|
2,250 |
|
||
Cash paid for income taxes, net of refunds |
|
1,431 |
|
702 |
|
||
Cash paid for interest |
|
511 |
|
321 |
|
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
LKQ CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity and Other Comprehensive Income
( In thousands )
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
Common Stock |
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
Total |
|
||||||||
|
|
Shares |
|
|
|
Paid-In |
|
|
|
Retained |
|
Comprehensive |
|
Stockholders |
|
||||||
|
|
Issued |
|
Amount |
|
Capital |
|
Warrants |
|
Earnings |
|
Income |
|
Equity |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
BALANCE, December 31, 2004 |
|
20,565 |
|
$ |
206 |
|
$ |
201,484 |
|
$ |
261 |
|
$ |
1,140 |
|
$ |
980 |
|
$ |
204,071 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,401 |
|
|
|
8,401 |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Unrealized gain (loss) on investment in equity securities, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
(6 |
) |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,396 |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Equity-related compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Exercise of stock options, including related tax benefits of $426 |
|
88 |
|
1 |
|
1,064 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,065 |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
BALANCE, March 31, 2005 |
|
20,653 |
|
$ |
207 |
|
$ |
202,590 |
|
$ |
261 |
|
$ |
9,541 |
|
$ |
975 |
|
$ |
213,574 |
|
5
LKQ Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
The accompanying Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of LKQ Corporation and its subsidiaries (the Company). All significant intercompany transactions and accounts have been eliminated. The accompanying Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared by the Company pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission applicable to interim financial statements. Accordingly, certain information related to the Companys significant accounting policies and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States have been condensed or omitted. These Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements reflect, in the opinion of management, all material adjustments (which include only normal recurring adjustments) necessary to fairly state, in all material respects, the financial position, results of operations and cash flows of the Company for the periods presented.
Operating results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results that can be expected for any subsequent interim period or for a full year. These interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Companys audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Companys most recent report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Note 2. Receivables
The Company has recorded a reserve for uncollectible accounts of approximately $1.9 million and $1.7 million at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively.
Inventory consists of the following:
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Salvage parts |
|
$ |
62,199 |
|
$ |
61,390 |
|
Aftermarket parts |
|
14,510 |
|
8,999 |
|
||
Cores |
|
3,331 |
|
3,761 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
$ |
80,040 |
|
$ |
74,150 |
|
Intangible assets consist primarily of goodwill (the cost of purchased businesses in excess of the fair value of the net assets acquired) and covenants not to compete.
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill during the three months ended March 31, 2005 are as follows:
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2004 |
|
$ |
100,319 |
|
Business acquisitions |
|
12,336 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
112,655 |
|
Note 5. Income Taxes
Income taxes provided are based upon the Companys anticipated annual effective income tax rate.
6
In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, Inventory Costs, an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4 (SFAS 151). SFAS 151 amends Accounting Research Bulletin No. 43, Chapter 4, to clarify that abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs and wasted materials (spoilage) should be recognized as current-period charges. In addition, SFAS 151 requires that allocation of fixed production overhead to inventory be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. SFAS 151 is effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company is currently assessing the impact that SFAS 151 may have on its results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment(SFAS 123R), a revision of SFAS 123. SFAS 123R requires the adoption of a fair-value method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. SFAS 123R was to be effective as of the beginning of the first interim fiscal period that begins after June 15, 2005. In applying the fair value concepts of SFAS 123R, the Company will be required to choose among alternative valuation models and other assumptions. Although the Company had not completed its assessment of the impact of SFAS 123R, it had initially estimated that it would negatively impact its results of operations for 2005 by approximately $0.5 million or $0.02 per diluted share.
On April 14, 2005, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission announced a deferral of the effective date of SFAS 123R for calendar year companies until the beginning of 2006. As a result, the Companys 2005 results of operations will not be impacted by the implementation of SFAS 123R. The Company is currently assessing the impact that SFAS 123R may have on its future results of operations. The Company does not expect that the adoption of this standard will have a material impact on its consolidated financial position or cash flows.
The Company has three stock-based compensation plans, the LKQ Corporation 1998 Equity Incentive Plan (the Equity Incentive Plan), the Stock Option and Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors (the Director Plan), and a separate stock option plan for our Chief Executive Officer (the CEO Plan). The Company accounts for its stock compensation arrangements under the provisions of Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (APB 25). The Company has adopted the disclosure-only provisions of SFAS 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (SFAS 123), as amended by SFAS 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation-Transition and Disclosures (SFAS 148).
Under the CEO Plan, the difference between the fair market value of the option at the time granted in 1998 and the exercise price was recorded as deferred compensation expense and was charged to operations over the vesting period of the options which ended in November 2003. No stock-based compensation cost is reflected in net income for the Equity Incentive Plan or the Director Plan at the date of issuance of the options, as all options granted under these plans had an exercise price equal to or greater than the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant.
The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123 to the Equity Incentive Plan and the Director Plan, including, in 2005, the effect of accelerating the vesting schedules of options granted in 2004:
7
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
|
|
(in thousands, except |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net income, as reported |
|
$ |
8,401 |
|
$ |
5,635 |
|
Add: Stock-based compensation expense, net of tax, included in net income as reported |
|
25 |
|
|
|
||
Less: Total stock-based compensation expense determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, net of related tax effects |
|
(3,823 |
) |
(653 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Pro forma net income |
|
$ |
4,603 |
|
$ |
4,982 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Basic - as reported |
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
Basic - pro forma |
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Diluted - as reported |
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
Diluted - pro forma |
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
The fair value of stock options used to compute the pro forma disclosures has been estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. This model requires the use of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected volatility of the underlying stock. Projected data related to volatility and expected life of stock options is based upon historical and other information. Changes in the subjective underlying assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimates. For purposes of pro forma disclosure, the estimated fair value of the options is amortized to expense over the options vesting periods. The following table summarizes the assumptions used to compute the weighted average fair value of stock option grants:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||||
|
|
March 31, |
|
||||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Expected life (in years) |
|
5.8 |
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
||
Risk-free interest rate |
|
3.94 |
% |
|
3.87 |
% |
|
||
Volatility |
|
40.0 |
% |
|
40.0 |
% |
|
||
Dividend yield |
|
0 |
% |
|
0 |
% |
|
||
Weighted average fair value of options granted |
|
$ |
7.61 |
|
|
$ |
9.14 |
|
|
A summary of transactions in the Companys stock-based compensation plans for the three months ended March 31, 2005 is as follows:
|
|
Options |
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
Available |
|
Number of |
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
for |
|
Shares |
|
Exercise |
|
|
|
|
Grant |
|
Outstanding |
|
Price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2004 |
|
1,007,330 |
|
3,981,985 |
|
$ |
11.71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
(726,000 |
) |
726,000 |
|
17.26 |
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
|
(87,410 |
) |
7.31 |
|
|
Cancelled |
|
10,200 |
|
(10,200 |
) |
14.89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2005 |
|
291,530 |
|
4,610,375 |
|
$ |
12.66 |
|
8
The following table summarizes information about outstanding and exercisable stock options at March 31, 2005:
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Exercisable |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
Average |
|
|
|
Average |
|
||||
Range of |
|
|
|
Contractual |
|
Exercise |
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
||||
Exercise Prices |
|
Shares |
|
Life (Yrs) |
|
Price |
|
Shares |
|
Price |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
$ 1.00 - $ 3.00 |
|
341,700 |
|
5.7 |
|
$ |
2.93 |
|
|
227,600 |
|
$ |
2.89 |
|
|
8.00 - 10.00 |
|
1,410,725 |
|
6.2 |
|
8.77 |
|
|
860,535 |
|
9.03 |
|
|
||
12.50 - 15.00 |
|
1,454,750 |
|
5.4 |
|
13.83 |
|
|
1,293,150 |
|
13.92 |
|
|
||
15.83 - 18.87 |
|
1,403,200 |
|
9.3 |
|
17.74 |
|
|
917,000 |
|
17.72 |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
4,610,375 |
|
6.9 |
|
$ |
12.66 |
|
|
3,298,285 |
|
$ |
12.94 |
|
|
Stock options expire 10 years from the date they are granted. Most of the options granted under the Equity Incentive Plan and the CEO Plan vest over a period of five years. Options granted under the Director Plan vest six months after the date of grant.
On January 7, 2005, the Companys Board of Directors authorized the Compensation Committee to make the 2005 annual grant of stock options to employees (the 2005 Options). On January 14, 2005, the Compensation Committee granted options to purchase a total of 422,000 shares of LKQ common stock with an exercise price of $17.68 per share. The vesting schedule for each of the 2005 Options is as follows: June 14, 2005 with respect to 50% of the number of shares subject to such option and, with respect to an additional 5.555% of the number of shares subject to such option, January 14, 2006 and each six month anniversary thereafter until January 14, 2010. This vesting schedule is different than the typical vesting schedule for options granted under the Equity Incentive Plan.
On January 10, 2005, the Compensation Committee amended the vesting schedule of a total of 428,500 options granted to employees in 2004 under the Equity Incentive Plan, accelerating the vesting schedule to make all unvested shares subject to the options exercisable on January 10, 2005. The Compensation Committee decided to accelerate the vesting schedule of these options primarily as a supplement to compensation due to the expected reduction of cash bonuses to employees for the 2004 calendar year. The bonus formula established by the Company in January 2004 resulted in reduced 2004 bonuses for many LKQ employees as compared to 2003. In addition, the Compensation Committee decided it was in the best interests of stockholders to accelerate these options as the Company will avoid compensation expense in future periods that would otherwise result from the effectiveness of SFAS 123R for periods beginning subsequent to December 31, 2005.
On January 28, 2005, the Companys Board of Directors granted options to purchase a total of 300,000 shares of LKQ common stock at an exercise price of $16.66 per share. The options were immediately exercisable with respect to all of the shares subject to the options. This vesting schedule is different than the typical vesting schedule for options granted under the Equity Incentive Plan.
Long-Term Obligations consist of the following:
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Revolving credit facility |
|
$ |
56,000 |
|
$ |
47,000 |
|
Notes payable to individuals in monthly installments through November 2010, interest at 3.0% to 10.0% |
|
3,090 |
|
3,242 |
|
||
Secured equipment note, payable in monthly installments through July 2008 |
|
19 |
|
20 |
|
||
|
|
59,109 |
|
50,262 |
|
||
Less current maturities |
|
(220 |
) |
(317 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
$ |
58,889 |
|
$ |
49,945 |
|
On February 17, 2004, the Company entered into a new unsecured revolving credit facility that matures in February 2007, replacing a secured credit facility that would have expired on June 30, 2005. As a result, the Company recorded a loss of $346,000 in 2004 from the write-off of debt issuance costs related to the previous secured facility. The new revolving credit facility initially had a maximum availability of $75.0 million, which was amended to $100.0 million on January 31, 2005. In order to make any borrowing under the revolving credit facility, after giving effect to such borrowing, the Company must be in compliance with all of the covenants under the credit facility, including, without limitation, a senior debt to EBITDA ratio which cannot exceed 2.50 to 1.00. The revolving credit facility contains customary covenants,
9
including, among other things, limitations on the payment of cash dividends, restrictions on the payment of other dividends and on purchases, redemptions and acquisitions of the Companys stock, limitations on additional indebtedness, certain limitations on acquisitions, mergers and consolidations, and the maintenance of certain financial ratios. The interest rate on advances under the revolving credit facility may be either the bank prime lending rate, on the one hand, or the Interbank Offering Rate (IBOR) plus an additional percentage ranging from .875% to 1.375%, on the other hand, at the Companys option. The percentage added to IBOR is dependent upon the Companys total funded debt to EBITDA ratio for the trailing four quarters. The Company was in compliance with all covenants throughout 2005 and 2004. The weighted-average interest rate on borrowings outstanding against the Companys credit facility at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 was 4.06% and 3.16%, respectively. Borrowings against the credit facility totaled $56.0 million and $47.0 million at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively, and are classified as long-term obligations.
The Company is obligated under noncancelable operating leases for corporate office space, warehouse and distribution facilities, trucks and certain equipment. The future minimum lease commitments under these leases at March 31, 2005 are as follows:
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended December 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
8,335 |
|
Years ended December 31: |
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
9,427 |
|
|
2007 |
|
8,627 |
|
|
2008 |
|
7,413 |
|
|
2009 |
|
3,715 |
|
|
2010 |
|
986 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
2,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
41,293 |
|
The Company also has certain other contingent liabilities resulting from litigation, claims and other commitments and is subject to a variety of environmental and pollution control laws and regulations incident to the ordinary course of business. Management believes that the probable resolution of such contingencies will not materially affect the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.
Note 10. Earnings Per Share
The following chart sets forth the computation of earnings per share:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
March 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
|
|
(in thousands, except |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net income |
|
$ |
8,401 |
|
$ |
5,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Denominator for basic earnings per share-Weighted-average shares outstanding |
|
20,631 |
|
19,643 |
|
||
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Stock options |
|
894 |
|
936 |
|
||
Warrants |
|
1,167 |
|
1,602 |
|
||
Denominator for diluted earnings per share-Adjusted weighted-average shares outstanding |
|
22,692 |
|
22,181 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Earnings per share, basic |
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Earnings per share, diluted |
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
10
The following chart sets forth the number of employee stock options and warrants outstanding but not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because their effect would have been antidilutive:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
||||
Antidilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Stock options |
|
260 |
|
|
200 |
|
|
Warrants |
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
Note 11. Business Combinations
During the three month period ended March 31, 2004, the Company acquired a 100% equity interest in each of three businesses (two in the recycled OEM automotive parts business and, on February 20, 2004, Global Trade Alliance, Inc., one of the largest suppliers of aftermarket collision automotive replacement parts in the Midwest) for an aggregate of $41.9 million in cash, of which $2.3 million was to be paid subsequent to March 31, 2004, and 123,296 shares of the Companys common stock. The acquisitions enabled the Company to serve new market areas, become a significant provider of aftermarket automotive collision parts and become a provider of self-service retail automotive parts.
On January 31, 2005, the Company acquired Bodymaster Auto Parts, Inc. and an affiliated company (Bodymaster) that operate in the aftermarket collision automotive replacement parts business for an aggregate of $15.8 million in cash. The acquisition enables the Company to serve new market areas. In connection with the acquisition of Bodymaster, the Company held $0.6 million in restricted cash. In accordance with the terms of the purchase agreement, the restrictions will be removed by January 31, 2006 or the Company will be reimbursed from funds currently held in escrow. During the quarter ended March 31, 2005, the amount of cash restricted was reduced by $0.1 million.
The acquisitions are being accounted for under the purchase method of accounting and are included in the Companys financial statements from the dates of acquisition.
11
The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed for the acquisitions completed during the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004. The initial purchase price allocations may be adjusted within one year of the purchase date for changes in estimates of the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed.
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Restricted cash |
|
$ |
599 |
|
$ |
|
|
Receivables, net |
|
825 |
|
2,229 |
|
||
Inventory |
|
4,277 |
|
7,672 |
|
||
Prepaid expenses |
|
37 |
|
221 |
|
||
Property and equipment |
|
390 |
|
4,882 |
|
||
Goodwill |
|
12,336 |
|
35,901 |
|
||
Other intangibles |
|
49 |
|
|
|
||
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
|
758 |
|
||
Other assets |
|
40 |
|
69 |
|
||
Current liabilities assumed |
|
(2,738 |
) |
(7,049 |
) |
||
Long-term obligations assumed |
|
|
|
(495 |
) |
||
Notes issued |
|
|
|
(2,250 |
) |
||
Purchase price payable |
|
|
|
(50 |
) |
||
Common stock issued |
|
|
|
(2,250 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash used in acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
|
$ |
15,815 |
|
$ |
39,638 |
|
The Company recorded goodwill of $12.3 million during the three month period ended March 31, 2005, all of which is expected to be deductible for income tax purposes. Of the $35.9 million of goodwill recorded during the three month period ended March 31, 2004, $3.9 million is expected to be deductible for income tax purposes.
12
The following pro forma summary presents the effect of the businesses acquired during 2005 and 2004 as though the businesses had been acquired as of January 1, 2004 and is based upon unaudited financial information of the acquired entities:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
|
|
(in thousands, except |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Revenue as reported |
|
$ |
133,807 |
|
$ |
100,073 |
|
Revenue of purchased businesses for the period prior to acquisition |
|
1,749 |
|
22,647 |
|
||
Pro forma revenue |
|
$ |
135,556 |
|
$ |
122,720 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net income as reported |
|
$ |
8,401 |
|
$ |
5,635 |
|
Net income of purchased businesses for the period prior to acquisition |
|
21 |
|
1,133 |
|
||
Pro forma net income |
|
$ |
8,422 |
|
$ |
6,768 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Earnings per share-basic |
|
|
|
|
|
||
As reported |
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
Effect of purchased businesses for the period prior to acquisition |
|
0.00 |
|
0.05 |
|
||
Pro forma earnings per share-basic |
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Earnings per share-diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
||
As reported |
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
Effect of purchased businesses for the period prior to acquisition |
|
0.00 |
|
0.05 |
|
||
Pro forma earnings per share-diluted |
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
These pro forma results are not necessarily indicative either of what would have occurred if the acquisitions had been in effect for the period presented or of future results.
Note12. Subsequent Events
In April 2005, the Company acquired 100% equity interests in two companies, one in the recycled OEM automotive parts business in South Carolina and one in the self-service retail automotive parts business in Tennessee, for an aggregate of approximately $7.8 million in cash and $0.3 million in notes issued. The acquisitions enable the Company to serve new market areas.
13
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Overview
The repair of automobiles includes the purchase of automotive replacement parts. Buyers of replacement parts have the option to purchase from primarily three sources: new parts produced by original equipment manufacturers, which are commonly known as OEM parts; new parts produced by companies other than the OEMs, sometimes referred to generically as aftermarket parts; and recycled parts originally produced by OEMs, which we refer to as recycled OEM products. We have historically sold primarily recycled OEM products. In 2004, we expanded our product lines to include aftermarket collision automotive replacement parts. We believe that this expansion of our product offerings will allow us to fill more of our customers requests.
Since our formation in 1998, we have grown through both internal development and acquisitions. For the first 18 months of our existence, we focused on growth through acquisitions. Our acquisition strategy has been to target companies with strong management teams, a record of environmental compliance, solid growth prospects and a reputation for quality and customer service.
Internal growth is an important driver of our revenue and operating results. Since 1999, we have continued to focus on growing our recycled product sales and operating results within our existing organization. We have done so by developing our regional distribution networks and by creating overnight product transfers between our facilities to better leverage our inventory investment and to increase our ability to fill customer demand.
Our revenue, cost of goods sold and operating results have fluctuated on a quarterly and annual basis in the past and can be expected to continue to fluctuate in the future as a result of a number of factors, some of which are beyond our control. Factors that may affect our operating results include, but are not limited to:
fluctuations in the pricing of new OEM replacement parts;
the availability and cost of inventory;
variations in vehicle accident rates;
increasing competition in the automotive parts industry;
changes in state or federal laws or regulations affecting our business
changes in the types of replacement parts that insurance carriers will accept in the repair process;
our ability to integrate and manage our acquisitions successfully;
fluctuations in fuel prices;
changes in the demand for our products and the supply of our inventory due to severity of weather and seasonality of weather patterns;
the amount and timing of operating costs and capital expenditures relating to the maintenance and expansion of our business, operations and infrastructure; and
declines in the value of our assets.
Due to the foregoing factors, our operating results in one or more future periods can be expected to fluctuate. Accordingly, our results of operations may not be indicative of future performance.
Sources of Revenue
Our revenue from the sale of automotive replacement products and related services has typically ranged between 91% and 93% of our total revenue. We sell the majority of our automotive replacement products to collision repair shops and mechanical repair shops. Our automotive replacement products include, for example, engines, transmissions, front-ends, doors, trunk lids, bumpers, hoods, fenders, grilles, valances, headlights and taillights. We sell extended warranty contracts for certain mechanical products. These contracts cover the cost of parts and labor and are sold for periods of six months, one year or two years. We defer the revenue from such contracts and recognize it ratably over the term of the contracts. The demand for our products and services is influenced by several factors, including the number of vehicles in operation, the number of miles being driven, the frequency and severity of vehicle accidents, availability and pricing of new parts, seasonal weather patterns and local weather conditions. Additionally, automobile insurers exert significant influence over collision repair shops as to how an insured vehicle is repaired and the cost level of the products used in the repair process. Accordingly, we consider automobile insurers to be key demand drivers of our products. We provide insurance companies services that include the review of vehicle repair order estimates, as well as direct quotation services to their adjusters. There is no standard price for recycled OEM products, but rather a pricing structure that varies from day to day based upon such factors as product availability, quality, demand, new OEM replacement part prices and the age of the vehicle being repaired. The pricing for aftermarket collision automotive replacement parts is determined based on a number of factors, including availability, quality, demand, new OEM replacement part prices and competitor pricing.
14
Approximately 7% to 9% of our revenue is obtained from other sources. These include bulk sales to mechanical remanufacturers, scrap sales and sales of damaged vehicles that we sell to vehicle repairers.
When we obtain mechanical products from dismantled vehicles and determine they are damaged or when we have a surplus of a certain mechanical product type, we sell them in bulk to mechanical remanufacturers. The majority of these products are sorted by product type and model type. Examples of such products are engine blocks and heads, transmissions, starters, alternators, and air conditioner compressors. After we have recovered all the products we intend to resell, the remaining materials are crushed and sold to scrap processors.
Cost of Goods Sold
Our cost of goods sold for recycled OEM products includes the price we pay for the salvage vehicle and, where applicable, auction fees, storage, and towing. Our cost of goods sold also includes other costs such as labor and other costs we incur to acquire and dismantle such vehicles. Our labor and labor-related costs related to buying and dismantling account for approximately 10% of our salvage cost of goods sold. The acquisition and dismantling of salvage vehicles is a manual process and, as a result, energy costs are not material.
Our cost of goods sold for aftermarket collision automotive replacement parts includes the price we pay for the parts, freight and other inventoried costs such as labor and other costs to acquire, including import fees and duties, where applicable. Our aftermarket collision automotive replacement parts are acquired from a number of vendors located primarily overseas, with the majority of our overseas vendors located in Taiwan.
In the event we do not have a recycled replacement part or suitable aftermarket replacement part in our inventory, we attempt to purchase the part from a competitor. We refer to these parts as brokered parts. The revenue from products that we obtain from third party recyclers to sell to our customers ranges from 7% to 10% of our total revenue. The gross margin on brokered product sales as a percentage of revenue is generally less than half of what we achieve from sales of our own inventory because we must pay higher prices for these products.
Some of our mechanical products are sold with a standard six-month warranty against defects. We record the estimated warranty costs at the time of sale using historical warranty claim information to project future warranty claims activity and related expenses. Our warranty expense is approximately 1% of our total cost of goods sold. Our warranty reserve activity during the first three months of 2005 was as follows:
Balance as of December 31, 2004 |
|
$ |
280,000 |
|
Warranty expense |
|
634,000 |
|
|
Warranty claims |
|
(634,000 |
) |
|
Balance as of March 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
280,000 |
|
We also sell separately priced extended warranty contracts for certain mechanical products. The expense related to extended warranty claims is recognized when the claim is made.
Expenses
Our facility and warehouse expenses primarily include our costs to operate our processing, redistribution, self-service and warehouse facilities. These costs include labor for both plant management and facility and warehouse personnel, facility rent, property and liability insurance, utilities and other occupancy costs.
Our distribution expenses primarily include our costs to deliver our products to our customers. Included in our distribution expense category are labor costs for drivers, local delivery and transfer truck rentals and subcontractor costs, vehicle repairs and maintenance, insurance and fuel.
Our selling and marketing expenses primarily include our advertising, promotion and marketing costs, salary and commission expenses for sales personnel, sales training, telephone and other communication expenses, and bad debt expense. Personnel costs account for approximately 80% of our selling and marketing expenses. Most of our wholesale recycled sales personnel are paid on a commission basis. The number and quality of our sales force is critical to our ability to respond to our customers needs and increase our sales volume. We are continually evaluating our sales force, developing and implementing training programs, and utilizing appropriate measurements to assess our selling effectiveness.
15
Our general and administrative expenses include primarily the costs of our corporate and regional offices that provide corporate and field management, treasury, accounting, legal, payroll, business development, human resources and information systems functions.
Seasonality
Our operating results are subject to quarterly variations based on a variety of factors, influenced primarily by seasonal changes in weather patterns. During the winter months we tend to have higher demand for our products. In addition, the cost of salvage vehicles tends to be lower as more weather related accidents occur generating a larger supply of total loss vehicles.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates, assumptions and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, assumptions and judgments including those related to revenue recognition, warranty costs, inventory valuation, allowance for doubtful accounts, goodwill impairments, self-insurance programs, contingencies, asset impairments and taxes. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances. The results of these estimates form the basis for our judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and our recognition of revenue. Actual results may differ from these estimates.
Revenue Recognition
We recognize and report revenue from the sale of automotive replacement products when they are shipped and title has transferred, subject to a reserve for returns, discounts and allowances that management estimates based upon historical information. A repair product would ordinarily be returned within a few days of shipment. Discounts may be earned based upon sales volumes or sales volumes coupled with prompt payment. Allowances are normally given within a few days following product shipment.
We also sell separately priced extended warranty contracts for certain mechanical products. Revenue from these contracts is deferred and recognized ratably over the term of the contracts.
Warranty Reserves
We issue a standard six-month warranty against defects on some of our mechanical products. We record an accrual for standard warranty claims at the time of sale using historical warranty claim information to project future warranty claims activity and related expenses. We analyze historical warranty claim activity by referencing the claims made and aging them from the original product sale date. We use this information to project future warranty claims on actual products sold that are still under warranty at the end of an accounting period. A 10% increase in our historical 2004 annual warranty claims would result in an additional annual expense of approximately $0.2 million.
Inventory Accounting
Salvage Inventory. Salvage inventory is recorded at the lower of cost or market. Our salvage inventory cost is established based upon the price we pay for a vehicle, and includes buying, dismantling and, where applicable, auction fees, storage, and towing. Inventory carrying value is determined using the average cost to sales percentage at each of our facilities and applying that percentage to the facilitys inventory at expected selling prices. The average cost to sales percentage is derived from each facilitys historical vehicle profitability for salvage vehicles purchased at auction or from contracted rates for salvage vehicles acquired under direct procurement arrangements.
Aftermarket Inventory. Aftermarket inventory is recorded at the lower of cost or market. Our aftermarket inventory cost is based on the average price we pay for parts, and includes expenses incurred for freight and buying, where applicable. For items purchased from foreign companies, import fees and duties and transportation insurance are also included.
For all inventory, our inventory carrying value is reduced regularly to reflect the age and current anticipated demand for our products. If actual demand differs from our estimates, additional reductions to our inventory carrying value would be necessary in the period such determination is made.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of customers to make required payments. The allowance for doubtful accounts is based on our assessment of the collectibility of specific customer accounts, the aging of the accounts receivable and our historical experience. Our allowance for doubtful accounts at March 31, 2005 was approximately $1.9 million, which represents 5.9% of gross receivables. If actual defaults are higher than our historical experience, our allowance for doubtful accounts may be insufficient to cover the uncollectible receivables, which could have an adverse impact on our operating results in the period of occurrence. A 10% change in the 2004 annual write-off rate would result in a change in the estimated allowance for doubtful accounts of approximately $0.1 million. Our exposure to uncollectible accounts receivable is limited because we have a large number of small customers that are generally geographically dispersed. We control credit risk through credit approvals, credit limits and monitoring policies. We also have certain customers that pay for products at the time of delivery.
16
We record goodwill as a result of our acquisitions. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, which we refer to as SFAS 142, requires us to analyze our goodwill for impairment at least annually. The determination of the value of goodwill requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect our consolidated financial statements. In assessing the recoverability of our goodwill, we must make assumptions regarding estimated future cash flows and other factors to determine fair value of the respective assets. If these estimates or their related assumptions change in the future, we may be required to record impairment charges for these assets. We perform goodwill impairment tests on an annual basis and between annual tests whenever events may indicate that an impairment exists. In response to changes in industry and market conditions, we may be required to strategically realign our resources and consider restructuring, disposing of or otherwise exiting businesses, which could result in an impairment of goodwill.
We utilize outside professionals in the valuation industry to validate the assumptions and overall methodology used to determine the fair value estimates used in our goodwill impairment testing. As of March 31, 2005, we had $112.7 million in goodwill that will be subject to future impairment tests. If we were required to recognize goodwill impairments in future periods, we would report those impairment losses as part of our operating results. We determined that no adjustments were necessary when we performed our annual impairment testing in the fourth quarter of 2004. A 10% decrease in the fair value estimates used in the fourth quarter of 2004 impairment test would not have changed this determination.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
We review long-lived assets for possible impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable. If our review indicates that the carrying value of long-lived assets is not recoverable, we reduce the carrying amount of the assets to fair value. We have had no adjustments to the carrying value of long-lived assets in 2005 or 2004.
Self-Insurance Programs
We self-insure a portion of employee medical benefits under the terms of our employee health insurance program. We also self-insure a portion of automobile, general liability and workers compensation claims. We have purchased stop-loss insurance coverage that limits our exposure to both individual claims as well as our overall claims. The cost of the stop-loss insurance is expensed over the contract periods.
We record an accrual for the claims expense related to our employee medical benefits, automobile, general liability and workers compensation claims based upon the expected amount of all such claims. If actual claims are higher than what we anticipated, our accrual might be insufficient to cover our claims costs, which would have an adverse impact on our operating results in that period. If we were to incur claims up to our aggregate stop-loss insurance coverage during the open policy years, we would have an additional expense of approximately $5.0 million on an annual basis.
Contingencies
We are subject to the possibility of various loss contingencies arising in the ordinary course of business resulting from litigation, claims and other commitments and from a variety of environmental and pollution control laws and regulations. We consider the likelihood of loss or the incurrence of a liability, as well as our ability to reasonably estimate the amount of loss, in determining loss contingencies. We accrue an estimated loss contingency when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. We determine the amount of reserves, if any, with the assistance of our outside legal counsel. We regularly evaluate current information available to us to determine whether the accruals should be adjusted. If the amount of an actual loss were greater than the amount we have accrued, the excess loss would have an adverse impact on our operating results in the period that the loss occurred. If the loss contingency is subsequently determined to no longer be probable, the amount of loss contingency previously accrued would be included in our operating results in the period such determination was made.
Accounting for Income Taxes
All income tax amounts reflect the use of the liability method. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based upon the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial and income tax reporting purposes. We operate in multiple tax jurisdictions with different tax rates and we determine the allocation of income to each of these jurisdictions based upon various estimates and assumptions. In the normal course of business we will undergo tax audits by various tax jurisdictions. Such audits often require an extended period of time to complete and may result in income tax adjustments if changes to the allocation are required between jurisdictions with different tax rates. Although we have recorded all probable income tax contingencies in accordance with SFAS No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies and SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, these accruals represent estimates that are subject to the inherent uncertainties associated with the tax audit process, and therefore include contingencies.
17
We record a provision for taxes based upon our expected annual effective income tax rate. We record a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax assets to the amount that we expect is more likely than not to be realized. We consider historical taxable income, expectations and risks associated with our estimates of future taxable income and ongoing tax planning strategies in assessing the need for a valuation allowance. We had a valuation allowance of $0.6 million and $0.2 million as of March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, against our deferred tax assets. Should we determine that it is more likely than not that we would be able to realize all of our deferred tax assets in the future, an adjustment to the net deferred tax asset would increase income in the period such determination was made. Conversely, should we determine that it is more likely than not that we would not be able to realize all of our deferred tax assets in the future, an adjustment to the net deferred tax assets would decrease income in the period such determination was made.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, Inventory Costs, an Amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4 (SFAS 151). SFAS 151 amends ARB 43, Chapter 4, to clarify that abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs and wasted materials (spoilage) must be recognized as current period charges. It also requires that allocation of fixed production overhead to the costs of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. SFAS 151 is effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. We are currently assessing the impact SFAS 151 may have on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123R), a revision of SFAS 123. SFAS 123R requires the adoption of a fair-value method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. SFAS 123R was to be effective as of the beginning of the first interim fiscal period that begins after June 15, 2005. In applying the fair value concepts of SFAS 123R, we will be required to choose among alternative valuation models and other assumptions. Although we had not completed our assessment of the impact SFAS 123R, we had initially estimated that it would negatively impact our results for 2005 by approximately $0.5 million or $0.02 per diluted share.
On April 14, 2005, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission announced a deferral of the effective date of SFAS 123R for calendar year companies until the beginning of 2006. As a result, our 2005 results of operations will not be impacted by the implementation of SFAS 123R. We are currently assessing the impact that SFAS 123R may have on our future results of operations. We do not expect that the adoption of this standard will have a material impact on our consolidated financial position or cash flows.
Acquisitions
In the first quarter of 2005, we completed an acquisition in the aftermarket automotive replacement parts business with two locations, near Philadelphia and Washington, D.C., for approximately $15.8 million in cash. This acquisition enables us to expand our presence in these areas of the country.
In April 2005, we completed two acquisitions in the recycled OEM automotive parts business for an aggregate of approximately $7.8 million in cash and $0.3 million in notes issued. These acquisitions enable us to serve new markets.
Segment Reporting
Over 99% of our operations are conducted in the United States. During 2004, we acquired a recycled OEM automotive parts business with locations in Guatemala and Costa Rica. Revenue generated and properties located outside of the United States are not material. We manage our operations geographically. Our automotive replacement parts operations are organized into seven operating segments, six for recycled automotive replacement products and one for aftermarket automotive replacement products. These segments are aggregated into one reportable segment because they possess similar economic characteristics and have common products and services, customers and methods of distribution. Our automotive replacement parts operations account for over 90% of our revenue, earnings and assets.
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth statement of operations data as a percentage of total revenue for the periods indicated:
18
|
|
Three Months |
|
||||
Statement of Operations Data: |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
Revenue |
|
100.0 |
% |
|
100.0 |
% |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
53.2 |
% |
|
53.0 |
% |
|
Gross margin |
|
46.8 |
% |
|
47.0 |
% |
|
Facility and warehouse expenses |
|
10.8 |
% |
|
10.7 |
% |
|
Distribution expenses |
|
10.5 |
% |
|
10.7 |
% |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
13.2 |
% |
|
14.2 |
% |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
1.5 |
% |
|
1.5 |
% |
|
Operating income |
|
10.8 |
% |
|
9.9 |
% |
|
Other expense, net |
|
0.3 |
% |
|
0.4 |
% |
|
Income before provision for income taxes |
|
10.5 |
% |
|
9.4 |
% |
|
Net income |
|
6.3 |
% |
|
5.6 |
% |
|
Three months ended March 31, 2005 compared to three months ended March 31, 2004
Revenue. Our revenue increased 33.7% to $133.8 million for the three month period ended March 31, 2005, from $100.1 million for the comparable period of 2004. The revenue growth attributable to business acquisitions accounted for approximately $22.6 million of total revenue in the three month period ended March 31, 2005. The remaining increase in revenue is primarily due to the higher volume of products sold. We have continued to expand our services to the insured repair industry and added local delivery routes and transfer routes that helped us to increase our market penetration. Our ability to combine recycled OEM and aftermarket parts offerings to our customers is further contributing to increased sales volumes. We also completed a business acquisition in the first quarter of 2005.
Cost of Goods Sold. Our cost of goods sold increased 34.1% to $71.2 million for the three month period ended March 31, 2005, from $53.1 million for the comparable period of 2004. The increase in cost of goods sold was primarily due to increased volume of products sold. As a percentage of revenue, cost of goods sold increased from 53.0% to 53.2%. The increase in cost of goods sold percentage was due primarily to an increase of $1.2 million in sales of damaged vehicles to vehicle repairers. These sales have a lower gross margin than our automotive replacement parts sales.
Gross Margin. Our gross margin increased 33.3% to $62.6 million for the three month period ended March 31, 2005, from $47.0 million for the comparable period of 2004. Our gross margin increased primarily due to increased volume. As a percentage of revenue, gross margin decreased from 47.0% to 46.8%. Our gross margin as a percentage of revenue decreased due primarily to the factors noted above in Cost of Goods Sold.
Facility and Warehouse Expenses. Facility and warehouse expenses increased 34.7% to $14.5 million for the three month period ended March 31, 2005, from $10.7 million for the comparable period of 2004. Our acquisitions accounted for $2.7 million in higher facility and warehouse expenses. As a percentage of revenue, facility and warehouse expenses increased from 10.7% to 10.8%. We had higher wages and benefit costs along with incentive compensation for field personnel totaling $0.6 million, coupled with higher repairs and maintenance and supplies expenses of $0.2 million. We also had higher expenses of approximately $0.2 million related to the addition of three greenfield recycling operations and two aftermarket warehouses, partially offset by $0.1 million of lower rent expense due primarily to our exercise of purchase options on certain production facilities that we previously leased.
Distribution Expenses. Distribution expenses increased 31.8% to $14.1 million for the three month period ended March 31, 2005, from $10.7 million for the comparable period of 2004. Our acquisitions accounted for $2.2 million of the increase in distribution expenses. Our remaining distribution expenses increased as we increased the number of local delivery trucks by approximately 5.4%. We also operated 10.0% more daily transfer routes between our facilities and increased contracted salvage transfer services by 21.1% due to the increase in parts volume. We increased the amount of product we moved between our recycled OEM facilities in the three month period ended March 31, 2005 over the comparable period of 2004 by approximately 26.0%. In addition, higher wages, primarily from an increase in the number of employees, and increased fuel costs, truck rentals and repairs, and delivery supplies, partially offset by lower freight costs, accounted for the remaining growth in distribution expenses. We renegotiated our freight rates with substantially all of our common carriers in the fourth quarter of 2004, and we directed our sales force to recoup more of our shipping and handling costs. As a percentage of revenue our distribution expenses decreased from 10.7% to 10.5%.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased 24.8% to $17.7 million for the three month period ended March 31, 2005, from $14.2 million for the comparable period of 2004. Our acquisitions accounted for $2.4 million of the increase in selling, general and administrative expenses. The majority of the remaining expense increase was due to labor and labor-related expenses, including higher incentive compensation, professional fees, and rent expense partially offset by lower advertising and sales promotion expenses. Our selling expenses tend to rise as revenue increases due to the commission of our wholesale recycled parts inside sales force. As a percentage of revenue our selling, general and administrative expenses decreased from 14.2% to 13.2%.
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization increased 30.6% to $2.0 million for the three month period ended March 31, 2005, from $1.5 million for the comparable period of 2004. Our acquisitions accounted for $0.3 million of the increase in depreciation and amortization. As a percentage of revenue our depreciation and amortization remained constant at 1.5%.
Operating Income. Operating income increased 46.0% to $14.4 million for the three month period ended March 31, 2005, from $9.9 million for the comparable period of 2004. As a percentage of revenue, operating income increased from 9.9% to 10.8%.
Other (Income) Expense. Net other expense decreased 9.2% to $392,000 for the three month period ended March 31, 2005 from
19
$432,000 for the comparable period of 2004. As a percentage of revenue, net other expense decreased from 0.4% to 0.3%. Net interest expense increased 6.7% to $0.6 million for the three month period ended March 31, 2005, from $0.5 million for the comparable period of 2004. Our average borrowings increased approximately $43.3 million in the first quarter of 2005 as compared to the comparable period of 2004 due primarily to acquisitions. Included in interest expense in 2004 is $0.3 million in debt issuance costs that were written off. These costs were attributable to our previous secured bank credit facility that was terminated in February 2004. See Liquidity and Capital Resources below for further discussion of changes in our bank credit facilities.
Provision for Income Taxes. The provision for income taxes increased 47.6% to $5.6 million for the three month period ended March 31, 2005 from $3.8 million in the comparable period of 2004, due primarily to improved operating results. Our effective tax rate was 40.0% in 2005 and 40.2% in 2004.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our primary sources of ongoing liquidity are cash flow from our operations and our credit facility. At March 31, 2005, we had cash and equivalents amounting to $3.7 million, and we had $56.0 million outstanding under our $100 million unsecured bank credit facility. Our credit facility was utilized to finance our January 2005 acquisition of an automotive aftermarket replacement parts business for approximately $15.8 million. At the time of this acquisition we increased the total capacity of our bank credit facility to $100 million from $75 million. Based on our current plans, we expect to generate positive cash flow from operating activities for 2005 and believe that cash flow from operating activities and availability under our bank credit facility will be adequate to fund our short term liquidity needs. As of May 1, 2005, debt outstanding under our credit facility totaled approximately $64.0 million.
Our liquidity needs are primarily to fund working capital requirements and expand our facilities and network. The procurement of inventory is the largest operating use of our funds. We normally pay for salvage vehicles acquired at salvage auctions and under some direct procurement arrangements at the time that we take possession of the vehicles. We acquired approximately 24,900 and 22,800 wholesale salvage vehicles in the three month periods ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. In addition, we acquired approximately 10,900 and 3,000 additional salvage vehicles for our self-service retail operations during the three month periods ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Furthermore, our purchases of aftermarket replacement parts totaled approximately $10.8 million and $3.0 million in the three month periods ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
We intend to continue to evaluate markets for potential growth through the internal development of redistribution centers, processing facilities, and aftermarket warehouses, through further integration of aftermarket and recycled parts facilities, and through selected business acquisitions. Our future liquidity and capital requirements will depend upon numerous factors, including the costs and timing of our internal development efforts and the success of those efforts, the costs and timing of expansion of our sales and marketing activities, and the costs and timing of future business acquisitions.
Net cash provided by operating activities totaled $11.3 million for the three month period ended March 31, 2005, compared to $5.9 million for the comparable period of 2004. Cash was provided by net income adjusted for non-cash items. Working capital uses of cash included an increase in receivables, inventory, and prepaid expenses and other assets along with a decrease in accounts payable, offset by increases in income taxes payable, accrued expenses and deferred revenue. Receivables increased due primarily to our increased sales volume and inventory increased to support that increased volume. Prepaid expenses and other assets increased primarily due to an increase in deferred compensation plan assets, while our income tax payables increased due primarily to higher taxable income. Cash from Other operating assets and liabilities decreased primarily due to the timing of vendor payments.
Net cash used in investing activities totaled $18.6 million for the three month period ended March 31, 2005, compared to $46.9 million for the comparable period of 2004. We invested $15.8 million in acquisitions in 2005 compared to $39.6 million in three acquisitions in the comparable period of 2004. Net property and equipment purchases decreased $3.7 million in 2005, due primarily to exercises of purchase options on leased facilities in 2004. We also exercised a warrant to acquire an equity investment for $0.7 million in 2004.
Net cash provided by financing activities totaled $9.4 million for the three month period ended March 31, 2005, compared to $28.7 million for the comparable period of 2004. Exercises of stock options and warrants provided $0.6 million and $1.8 million, respectively, in the three month periods ended March 31, 2005 and 2004. We borrowed $9.0 million and $30.0 million respectively, under our bank credit facility in the three month periods ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, primarily to fund acquisitions, while we repaid $0.2 million and $2.9 million of long-term debt obligations in those same periods. We also used $0.2 million in 2004 for debt issuance costs related to our unsecured credit facility.
On February 17, 2004, we entered into a new unsecured revolving credit facility that matures in February 2007, replacing a secured credit facility that would have expired on June 30, 2005. The new revolving credit facility initially had a maximum availability of $75.0 million. In order to make any borrowing under the revolving credit facility, after giving effect to any such borrowing, we must be in compliance with all of the covenants under the credit facility, including, without limitation, a senior debt to EBITDA ratio, which cannot exceed 2.50 to 1.00. The revolving credit facility contains customary covenants, including, among other things, limitations on our payment of cash dividends, restrictions on our payment of other dividends and on purchases, redemptions and acquisitions of our stock, limitations on additional indebtedness, certain limitations on acquisitions, mergers and consolidations, and the maintenance of certain financial ratios. The interest rate on advances under the revolving credit facility may be, at our option, either the bank prime lending rate, on the one hand, or the Interbank Offering Rate (IBOR) plus an additional percentage ranging from .875% to 1.375%, on the other hand. The percentage added to IBOR is dependent upon our total funded debt to EBITDA ratio for the trailing four quarters.
20
On January 31, 2005, we increased our unsecured credit facility availability with our bank group from $75 million to $100 million. In addition, we amended the credit facility to provide for the option to further increase the facility from $100 million to $125 million, with such funding increase subject to approval from the banks.
We may in the future borrow additional amounts under our revolving credit facility or enter into new or additional borrowing arrangements. We anticipate that any proceeds from such new or additional borrowing arrangements will be used for general corporate purposes, including to develop and acquire businesses and redistribution facilities, to further the integration of our aftermarket and recycled parts facilities, to expand and improve existing facilities, to purchase property, equipment and inventory, and for working capital.
As of May 1, 2005, we had approximately 1.3 million warrants outstanding at an exercise price of $2.00 per share that expire on February 14, 2006, and approximately 0.1 million warrants outstanding at an exercise price of $13.19 per share that expire on March 31, 2006.
We estimate that our capital expenditures for 2005 will be approximately $19 million, excluding business acquisitions. We expect to use these funds for asset replacements, to expand and improve current facilities, systems development projects and completion of a new facility. We anticipate that net cash provided by operating activities for 2005 will be between $23 million and $26 million.
The following table represents our future commitments under contractual obligations as of March 31, 2005:
|
|
Total |
|
Less than |
|
1-3 |
|
3-5 |
|
More than |
|
||||||||||
|
|
(In millions) |
|
||||||||||||||||||
Contractual obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Long-term debt |
|
$ |
59.1 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
57.8 |
|
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
Operating leases |
|
41.3 |
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
17.6 |
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|||||
Other long-term obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Deferred compensation plans |
|
2.5 |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|||||
Totals |
|
$ |
102.9 |
|
|
$ |
10.9 |
|
|
$ |
75.4 |
|
|
$ |
10.5 |
|
|
$ |
6.1 |
|
|
We believe that our current cash and equivalents, cash provided by operating activities and funds available under our existing credit facility will be sufficient to meet our current operating and capital requirements. However, we may, from time to time, raise additional funds through public or private financing, strategic relationships or other arrangements. There can be no assurance that additional funding, or refinancing of our current credit facility, if needed, will be available on terms attractive to us, or at all. Furthermore, any additional equity financing may be dilutive to stockholders, and debt financing, if available, may involve restrictive covenants. Our failure to raise capital if and when needed could have a material adverse impact on our business, operating results and financial condition.
Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q includes forward-looking statements. Words such as may, will, plan, should, expect, anticipate, believe, if, estimate, intend, project and similar words or expressions are used to identify these forward-looking statements. We have based these forward-looking statements on our current expectations and projections about future events. However, these forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties, assumptions and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different. These factors include, among other things:
uncertainty as to changes in U.S. general economic activity and the impact of these changes on the demand for our products;
fluctuations in the pricing of new OEM replacement parts;
the availability and cost of inventory;
variations in vehicle accident rates;
changes in state or federal laws or regulations affecting our business;
changes in the types of replacements parts that insurance carriers will accept in the repair process;
changes in the demand for our products and the supply of our inventory due to severity of weather and seasonality of weather patterns;
the amount and timing of operating costs and capital expenditures relating to the maintenance and expansion of our
21
business, operations and infrastructure;
increasing competition in the automotive parts industry;
our ability to increase or maintain revenue and profitability at our facilities;
uncertainty as to our future profitability;
uncertainty as to the impact on our industry of any terrorist attacks or responses to terrorist attacks;
our ability to operate within the limitations imposed by financing arrangements;
our ability to obtain financing on acceptable terms to finance our growth;
our ability to integrate and successfully operate recently acquired companies and any companies acquired in the future and the risks associated with these companies;
declines in the values of our assets;
fluctuations in fuel prices; and
our ability to develop and implement the operational and financial systems needed to manage our growing operations.
Other matters set forth in this Quarterly Report may also cause our actual future results to differ materially from these forward-looking statements. We cannot assure you that our expectations will prove to be correct. In addition, all subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements mentioned above. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. All of these forward-looking statements are based on our expectations as of the date of this Quarterly Report. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Our results of operations are exposed to changes in interest rates primarily with respect to borrowings under our credit facility, where interest rates are tied to either the prime rate or IBOR. Our previous secured credit facility required that we enter into an interest rate swap agreement to mitigate our interest rate risk on a portion of the balance outstanding. We do not however, as a matter of policy, enter into hedging contracts for trading or speculative purposes. The swap agreement, which expired on August 22, 2004, had a notional amount of $10.0 million under which we paid a fixed rate of interest of 2.65% and received payments based upon variable rates. The swap agreement was not designated as a hedging instrument and, as a result, changes in the fair value of the swap agreement were included in current period earnings. We recorded a non-cash credit of $30,000 during the three month period ended March 31, 2004, related to the change in fair value of the interest rate swap agreement.
The Company is also exposed to currency fluctuations with respect to the purchase of aftermarket parts in Taiwan. While all transactions with manufacturers based in Taiwan are conducted in U.S. dollars, changes in the relationship between the U.S. dollar and the New Taiwan dollar might impact the purchase price of aftermarket parts. We might not be able to pass on any price increases to customers. Under our present policies, we do not attempt to hedge this currency exchange rate exposure.
Our investment in our Central American operations is not material, and we do not attempt to hedge our foreign currency risk related to such operations.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
As of March 31, 2005, the end of the period covered by this report on Form 10-Q, an evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of LKQ Corporations management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the design and operation of these disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that we are able to collect, process and disclose the information we are required to disclose in the reports we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission within the required time periods. There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
22
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
Item 6. Exhibits
Exhibits
Exhibit Number |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
23
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on May 6, 2005.
|
LKQ CORPORATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Mark T. Spears |
|
|
Mark T. Spears |
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Frank P. Erlain |
|
|
Frank P. Erlain |
|
|
Vice President Finance and Controller |
|
|
(Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
24