Back to GetFilings.com



 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C.  20549

 

FORM 10-Q

 

ý  QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2005

 

or

 

o  TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

Commission File Number 001-12822

 

BEAZER HOMES USA, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

DELAWARE

 

58-2086934

(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. employer
Identification no.)

 

1000 Abernathy Road, Suite 1200, Atlanta, Georgia 30328

(Address of principal executive offices)        (Zip Code)

 

(770) 829-3700

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding twelve months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to the filing requirements for the past 90 days.

 

YES

 

ý

 

NO

 

o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

 

YES

 

ý

 

NO

 

o

 

 

Class

 

Outstanding at April 20, 2005

 

 

 

Common Stock, $0.001 par value

 

41,551,361 shares

 

 



 

BEAZER HOMES USA, INC.

FORM 10-Q

 

INDEX

 

PART I

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

 

 

 

 

 

Item 1

 

Financial Statements

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, March 31, 2005 and September 30, 2004

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, Three and Six Months Ended March 31, 2005 and 2004

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, Six Months Ended March 31, 2005 and 2004

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive (Loss) Income, Three and Six Months Ended March 31, 2005 and 2004

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Item 2

 

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Item 3

 

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Item 4

 

Controls and Procedures

 

 

 

PART II

OTHER INFORMATION

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Item 1

 

Legal Proceedings

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Item 4

 

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Item 6

 

Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

 

 

 

 

 

 

SIGNATURES

 

 

2



 

Part I. Financial Information

 

BEAZER HOMES USA, INC.

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share and per share data)

 

 

 

March 31,
2005

 

September 30,
2004

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

15,930

 

$

320,880

 

Accounts receivable

 

74,505

 

70,574

 

Inventory

 

 

 

 

 

Owned inventory

 

2,532,378

 

2,089,330

 

Consolidated inventory not owned

 

182,813

 

254,765

 

Total inventory

 

2,715,191

 

2,344,095

 

Investments in and advances to unconsolidated joint ventures

 

76,638

 

44,748

 

Deferred tax asset

 

46,698

 

47,052

 

Property, plant and equipment, net

 

25,514

 

24,671

 

Goodwill

 

121,368

 

251,603

 

Other assets

 

55,305

 

45,839

 

Total assets

 

$

3,131,149

 

$

3,149,462

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

Trade accounts payable

 

$

132,703

 

$

123,287

 

Other payables and accrued liabilities

 

480,069

 

437,608

 

Obligations related to consolidated inventory not owned

 

147,928

 

219,042

 

Term loan

 

200,000

 

200,000

 

Senior notes (net of discount of $13,910 and $14,663 respectively)

 

916,090

 

915,337

 

Other notes payable

 

34,700

 

22,067

 

Total liabilities

 

1,911,490

 

1,917,341

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stockholders’ equity:

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred stock (par value $.01 per share, 5,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued)

 

 

 

Common stock (par value $.001 and $.01 per share, 80,000,000 shares authorized, 41,551,361 and 53,605,047 issued and 41,551,361 and 41,191,419 outstanding, respectively)

 

42

 

536

 

Paid-in capital

 

514,625

 

593,392

 

Retained earnings

 

721,522

 

741,701

 

Treasury stock (0 and 12,413,628 shares)

 

 

(88,150

)

Unearned compensation

 

(16,530

)

(14,748

)

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

 

(610

)

Total stockholders’ equity

 

1,219,659

 

1,232,121

 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

 

$

3,131,149

 

$

3,149,462

 

 

See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

 

3



 

BEAZER HOMES USA, INC.

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

 

 

Three Months Ended
March 31,

 

Six Months Ended
March 31,

 

 

 

2005

 

2004

 

2005

 

2004

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total revenue

 

$

976,248

 

$

876,581

 

$

1,888,075

 

$

1,686,689

 

Costs and expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Home construction and land sales

 

796,057

 

699,020

 

1,492,412

 

1,343,969

 

Selling, general and administrative

 

108,070

 

99,717

 

212,664

 

189,224

 

Goodwill impairment charge

 

130,235

 

 

130,235

 

 

Operating (loss) income

 

(58,114

)

77,844

 

52,764

 

153,496

 

Equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures

 

301

 

378

 

199

 

935

 

Other income, net

 

1,436

 

1,872

 

4,000

 

3,017

 

(Loss) Income before income taxes

 

(56,377

)

80,094

 

56,963

 

157,448

 

Provision for income taxes

 

27,967

 

31,236

 

71,603

 

61,404

 

Net (loss) income

 

$

(84,344

)

$

48,858

 

$

(14,640

)

$

96,044

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average number of shares:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic (1)

 

40,409

 

39,993

 

40,352

 

39,918

 

Diluted (1)

 

40,409

 

41,595

 

40,352

 

41,538

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net (loss) income per common share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic (1)

 

$

(2.09

)

$

1.22

 

$

(0.36

)

$

2.41

 

Diluted (1)

 

$

(2.09

)

$

1.17

 

$

(0.36

)

$

2.31

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash dividends per share (1)

 

$

0.10

 

$

0.03

 

$

0.13

 

$

0.06

 

 


(1)          Share and per share amounts for prior periods have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the effect of the Company’s March 2005 three-for-one stock split.

 

See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

 

4



 

BEAZER HOMES USA, INC.

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)

 

 

 

Six Months Ended
March 31,

 

 

 

2005

 

2004

 

Cash flows from operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Net (loss) income

 

$

(14,640

)

$

96,044

 

Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash used in operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

9,635

 

8,035

 

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures

 

(199

)

(935

)

Goodwill impairment charge

 

130,235

 

 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable

 

(3,931

)

24,028

 

Increase in inventory

 

(420,134

)

(333,772

)

Increase in other assets

 

(9,468

)

(11,451

)

Increase in trade accounts payable

 

9,416

 

28,193

 

Increase in other liabilities

 

43,803

 

11,741

 

Other changes

 

1,694

 

1,521

 

Net cash used in operating activities

 

(253,589

)

(176,596

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from investing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Capital expenditures

 

(5,968

)

(3,926

)

Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures

 

(40,483

)

(3,116

)

Distributions from unconsolidated joint ventures

 

8,792

 

3,183

 

Net cash used in investing activities

 

(37,659

)

(3,859

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Repayment of other notes payable

 

(9,443

)

 

Proceeds from 6 1/2% senior notes

 

 

198,100

 

Proceeds from stock option exercises

 

1,280

 

1,728

 

Dividends paid

 

(5,539

)

(2,726

)

Debt issuance costs

 

 

(460

)

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities

 

(13,702

)

196,642

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents

 

(304,950

)

16,187

 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

 

320,880

 

73,372

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

 

$

15,930

 

$

89,559

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Supplemental cash flow information:

 

 

 

 

 

Interest paid

 

$

39,527

 

$

29,234

 

Income taxes paid

 

$

76,185

 

$

76,789

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Supplemental disclosures of non-cash activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated inventory not owned

 

$

 

$

207,672

 

Land purchased through issuance of note payable

 

$

22,076

 

$

8,928

 

 

See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

 

5



 

BEAZER HOMES USA, INC.

UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS

OF COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME

(in thousands)

 

 

 

Three Months Ended
March 31,

 

Six Months Ended
March 31,

 

 

 

2005

 

2004

 

2005

 

2004

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net (loss) income

 

$

(84,344

)

$

48,858

 

$

(14,640

)

$

96,044

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other comprehensive income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized gain on interest rate swaps, net of related taxes

 

 

565

 

610

 

1,312

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comprehensive (loss) income

 

$

(84,344

)

$

49,423

 

$

(14,030

)

$

97,356

 

 

See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

 

6



 

(1) Basis of Presentation

 

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Beazer Homes USA, Inc. (“Beazer Homes” or the “Company”) have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X.  Such financial statements do not include all of the information and disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements.  In our opinion, all adjustments (consisting solely of normal recurring accruals) necessary for a fair presentation have been included in the accompanying financial statements.  Certain items in prior period financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation.  For further information, refer to our audited consolidated financial statements appearing in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004.

 

The Company’s stockholders approved an amendment to the Company’s certificate of incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock from 30 million to 80 million shares, which resulted in a change in par value to $.001 per share.  The Company’s Board of Directors subsequently approved a three-for-one stock split in February 2005.  The stock split was effected in the form of a stock dividend paid on March 22, 2005 to shareholders of record at the close of business on March 10, 2005.  All share and per share amounts (except par value) have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the split.  There was no net effect on stockholders’ equity as a result of the stock split.

 

(2) Goodwill Impairment Charge

 

During the quarter ended March 31, 2005, we recorded a $130.2 million non-cash, non tax-deductible impairment charge to write off substantially all of the goodwill allocated to certain underperforming markets in Indiana, Ohio, Kentucky and Charlotte, North Carolina.  The goodwill had been recorded as a result of our April 2002 acquisition of Crossmann Communities.  The fair value of each reporting unit is determined based on expected discounted future cash flows.  The forecasts and valuations of the respective divisions, along with weaker than anticipated local economies, particularly in the Midwest markets, and severe price competition, particularly at entry level price points, led us to conclude the goodwill was impaired in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 142.

 

(3) Stock-Based Compensation

 

We account for stock awards granted to employees under the recognition and measurement principles of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and related Interpretations.  No compensation expense is recognized for stock options granted to employees because all stock options granted have exercise prices not less than the market value of our stock on the date of the grant.  Restricted stock granted to employees is valued based on the market price of the common stock on the date of the grant.

 

We account for stock awards issued to non-employees under the recognition and measurement principles of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” and Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 96-18: “Accounting for Equity Instruments That Are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services.”  Stock options issued to non-employees are valued using the Black-Scholes option pricing

 

7



 

model.  Restricted stock granted to non-employees is initially valued based on the market price of the common stock on the date of the grant.

 

Unearned compensation arising from the restricted stock granted to employees and from non-employee stock awards is amortized to expense using the straight-line method over the period of the restrictions. The balance of unearned compensation related to non-employee awards is adjusted on a quarterly basis to reflect changes in the market value of Beazer Homes’ common stock.  Unearned compensation is shown as a reduction of stockholders’ equity in the condensed consolidated balance sheets.

 

The following table illustrates the effect (in thousands, except per share amounts) on net income (loss) and earnings per share if we had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 to stock-based employee compensation:

 

 

 

Three Months Ended
March 31,

 

Six Months Ended
March 31,

 

 

 

2005

 

2004

 

2005

 

2004

 

Net (loss) income, as reported

 

$

(84,344

)

$

48,858

 

$

(14,640

)

$

96,044

 

Add: Stock-based employee compensation expense included in reported net (loss) income, net of related tax effects

 

1,750

 

1,129

 

3,099

 

2,108

 

Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects

 

(2,730

)

(1,867

)

(5,847

)

(3,466

)

Pro forma net (loss) income

 

$

(85,324

)

$

48,120

 

$

(17,388

)

$

94,686

 

(Loss) earnings per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic - as reported (1)

 

$

(2.09

)

$

1.22

 

$

(0.36

)

$

2.41

 

Basic - pro forma (1)

 

$

(2.11

)

$

1.20

 

$

(0.43

)

$

2.37

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted - as reported (1)

 

$

(2.09

)

$

1.17

 

$

(0.36

)

$

2.31

 

Diluted - pro forma (1)

 

$

(2.11

)

$

1.16

 

$

(0.43

)

$

2.31

 

 


(1)          Share and per share amounts for prior periods have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the effect of the Company’s

March 2005 three-for-one stock split.

 

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS 123(R) “Share-Based Payment”.  SFAS 123(R) requires the fair value of all share based payment transactions to be recognized in the financial statements.  As a result, upon adoption of SFAS 123(R) we will be required to recognize compensation expense for the fair value of employee stock options over the applicable vesting period.  We do not expect SFAS 123(R) to significantly change our accounting for restricted stock awards or non-employee stock awards.

 

SFAS 123(R) is effective as of the beginning of the first fiscal year that begins after June 15, 2005, the first quarter of our fiscal 2006.  SFAS 123(R) applies to new awards and to awards modified, repurchased, or cancelled after the required effective date, as well as to the unvested portion of awards outstanding as of the required effective date (“modified prospective application”). Upon adoption, prior periods may be, but are not required to be, restated.

 

8



 

In March 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission released SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 107, “Share-Based Payment.”  SAB No. 107 provides the SEC staff’s position regarding the implementation of SFAS No. 123(R).  SAB No. 107 contains interpretive guidance related to the interaction between SFAS No. 123(R) and certain SEC rules and regulations, as well as provides the staff’s views regarding the valuation of share-based payment transactions.  We are currently evaluating SAB No. 107 and will be incorporating it as part of our adoption of SFAS No. 123(R).

 

(4) Inventory

 

Inventory consists of (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

March 31,
2005

 

September 30,
2004

 

Homes under construction

 

$

1,026,916

 

$

847,517

 

Development projects in progress

 

1,318,522

 

1,105,933

 

Unimproved land held for future development

 

100,779

 

57,563

 

Model homes

 

86,161

 

78,317

 

Consolidated inventory not owned

 

182,813

 

254,765

 

 

 

$

2,715,191

 

$

2,344,095

 

 

Homes under construction includes homes finished and ready for delivery and homes in various stages of construction.  Excluding model homes, we had 365 completed homes (valued at $70.2 million) and 345 completed homes (valued at $69.1 million) at March 31, 2005 and September 30, 2004, respectively, that were not subject to a sales contract.

 

Development projects in progress consist principally of land and land improvement costs.  Certain of the fully developed lots in this category are reserved by a deposit or sales contract.

 

We acquire certain lots by means of option contracts.  Option contracts generally require the payment of cash for the right to acquire lots during a specified period of time at a certain price.  Under option contracts, both with and without specific performance provisions, purchase of the properties is contingent upon satisfaction of certain requirements by us and the sellers.  Our obligation with respect to options with specific performance provisions is included on our consolidated balance sheets in other payables and accrued liabilities.  Under option contracts without specific performance obligations, our liability is generally limited to forfeiture of the non-refundable deposits, letters of credit and other non-refundable amounts incurred, which aggregated approximately $207.1 million at March 31, 2005.  This amount includes letters of credit of approximately $28.6 million. Below is a summary of amounts, net of cash deposits, committed under all options at March 31, 2005 (in thousands):

 

9



 

 

 

Aggregate Exercise
Price of Options

 

Options with specific performance

 

$

19,740

 

Options without specific performance

 

$

2,045,549

 

Total options

 

$

2,065,289

 

 

Certain of our option contracts are with sellers who are deemed to be Variable Interest Entities (“VIEs”) under FASB Revised Interpretation No. 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an Interpretation of ARB No. 51” (“FIN 46R”).  FIN 46R defines a VIE as an entity with insufficient equity investment to finance its planned activities without additional financial support or an entity in which the equity investors lack certain characteristics of a controlling financial interest.  Pursuant to FIN 46R, an enterprise that absorbs a majority of the expected losses or receives a majority of the expected residual returns of a VIE is deemed to be the primary beneficiary of the VIE and must consolidate the VIE.

 

We have determined that we are the primary beneficiary of certain of these option contracts.  Our risk is generally limited to the option deposits that we pay, and creditors of the sellers generally have no recourse to the general credit of the Company.  Although we do not have legal title to the optioned land, for those option contracts for which we are the primary beneficiary, we are required to consolidate the land under option at fair value.  We believe that the exercise prices of our option contracts approximate their fair value.  Our consolidated balance sheets at March 31, 2005 and September 30, 2004 reflect consolidated inventory not owned of $182.8 million and $254.8 million, respectively.  Obligations related to consolidated inventory not owned totaled $147.9 million at March 31, 2005 and $219.0 million at September 30, 2004.  The difference between the balances of consolidated inventory not owned and obligations related to consolidated inventory not owned represents cash deposits paid under the option agreements.  The above disclosures of amounts committed under options include our obligations related to consolidated inventory not owned.

 

(5) Investments in and Advances to Unconsolidated Joint Ventures

 

We participate in a number of land development joint ventures in which we have less than a controlling interest.  Our joint ventures are typically entered into with developers and other homebuilders to develop finished lots for sale to the joint venture’s members and other third parties.  We account for our interest in these joint ventures under the equity method.  We recognize our share of profits from the sale of lots to other buyers.  Our share of profits from lots we purchase from the joint ventures are deferred and treated as a reduction of the cost of the land purchased from the joint venture.  Such profits are subsequently recognized at the time the home closes and title passes to the homebuyer.

 

Our joint ventures typically obtain secured acquisition and development financing.  In some instances, we and our joint venture partners have provided varying levels of guarantees of debt of our unconsolidated joint ventures.  At March 31, 2005 and September 30, 2004, we had repayment guarantees of $23.2 million and $10.0 million, respectively, and loan-to-value maintenance guarantees of $64.8 million and $56.8 million, respectively, of debt of unconsolidated joint ventures.  Repayment guarantees require us to repay our share of debt of unconsolidated joint ventures in the event the joint venture defaults on its obligations under the

 

10



 

borrowings.  Loan-to-value maintenance guarantees require us to repay our share of the venture’s borrowings to the extent such borrowings exceed a specified percentage of the value of the property securing the loan.

 

(6) Interest

 

The following table sets forth certain information regarding interest (in thousands):

 

 

 

Three Months Ended
March 31,

 

Six Months Ended
March 31,

 

 

 

2005

 

2004

 

2005

 

2004

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Capitalized interest in inventory, beginning of period

 

$

48,551

 

$

37,469

 

$

44,121

 

$

34,285

 

Interest incurred and capitalized

 

21,082

 

18,532

 

41,471

 

35,403

 

Capitalized interest amortized to cost of sales

 

(17,353

)

(15,187

)

(33,312

)

(28,874

)

Capitalized interest in inventory, end of period

 

$

52,280

 

$

40,814

 

$

52,280

 

$

40,814

 

 

(7) (Loss) Earnings Per Share

 

Basic and diluted (loss) earnings per share were calculated as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):

 

 

 

Three Months Ended
March 31,

 

Six Months Ended
March 31,

 

 

 

2005

 

2004

 

2005

 

2004

 

Basic:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net (loss) income

 

$

(84,344

)

$

48,858

 

$

(14,640

)

$

96,044

 

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding

 

40,409

 

39,993

 

40,352

 

39,918

 

Basic (loss) earnings per share

 

$

(2.09

)

$

1.22

 

$

(0.36

)

$

2.41

 

Diluted:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net (loss) income

 

$

(84,344

)

$

48,858

 

$

(14,640

)

$

96,044

 

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding

 

40,409

 

39,993

 

40,352

 

39,918

 

Effect of dilutive securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Restricted stock

 

 

767

 

 

766

 

Options to acquire common stock

 

 

834

 

 

855

 

Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding

 

40,409

 

41,594

 

40,352

 

41,539

 

Diluted (loss) earnings per share

 

$

(2.09

)

$

1.17

 

$

(0.36

)

$

2.31

 

 

Basic and diluted (loss) earnings per share amounts and weighted average shares outstanding for prior periods have been retroactively restated to reflect the effect of the Company’s March 2005 three-for-one stock split.

 

The calculation of diluted loss per share for the three and six months ended March 31, 2005, as calculated above, excludes the impact of the assumed conversion of shares underlying restricted stock units, stock options and our 4 5/8% Convertible Senior Notes because their inclusion would have been antidilutive.

 

11



 

In September 2004 the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) of the FASB reached a consensus on EITF Issue No. 04-8: “The Effect of Contingently Convertible Debt on Diluted Earnings Per Share” (“EITF 04-8”).  The consensus was ratified by the FASB in October 2004.  EITF 04-8 requires that shares issuable upon conversion of contingently convertible debt instruments (“Co-Cos”) be included in diluted earnings per share computations using the “if-converted method” regardless of whether the issuer’s stock price exceeds the contingent conversion price.  Prior to EITF 04-8, shares issuable upon conversion of Co-Cos were generally excluded from diluted earnings per share computations until the issuer’s stock price exceeded the contingent conversion price.  EITF 04-8, which applies to our 4 5/8 % Convertible Senior Notes issued in June 2004, was effective beginning with the first quarter of our fiscal 2005.  Restatement of prior period earnings per share amounts presented for comparative purposes is required.  The calculation of diluted loss per share for the three and six month periods ended March 31, 2005 excludes the impact of EITF 04-8 because its inclusion would be antidilutive.  Our 4 5/8 % Convertible Senior Notes were not outstanding at March 31, 2004, the adoption of EITF 04-8 had no impact on previously reported diluted earnings per share for the three and six months ended March 31, 2004.

 

(8) Long Term Debt

 

We have a credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) with a group of banks.  The Credit Facility includes a $550 million four-year revolving credit facility (the “Revolving Credit Facility”) and a $200 million four-year term loan (the “Term Loan”).  The Revolving Credit Facility and Term Loan mature in June 2008.  The Revolving Credit Facility and the Term Loan bear interest at a variable rate (4.44% at March 31, 2005) based upon LIBOR or the alternate base rate of interest announced by our lead bank.  The Credit Facility contains various operating and financial covenants.

 

Available borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility are limited to certain percentages of homes under contract, unsold homes, substantially improved lots and accounts receivable.  At March 31, 2005, we had no borrowings outstanding, and had available borrowings of $466.6 million under the Revolving Credit Facility.

 

In June 2004, we issued $180 million aggregate principal amount of 4 5/8% Convertible Senior Notes due 2024 (the “Convertible Senior Notes”) in a private placement pursuant to Rule 144A promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.  In August 2004, we filed a registration statement on Form S-3 with the SEC covering resales of the Convertible Senior Notes and the common stock issuable upon conversion.  The Convertible Senior Notes were issued at a price of 100% of their face amount (before underwriting discount and other issuance costs).  Interest on the Convertible Senior Notes is payable semiannually.  The notes are convertible by holders into shares of our common stock at an initial conversion rate of 19.44 shares of Beazer Homes common stock per $1,000 principal amount (subject to adjustment for customary reasons), representing an initial conversion price of $51.44 per share of common stock (adjusted for the March 2005 three-for-one stock split).  The notes are convertible if the price of our common stock is equal to or greater than 120% of the conversion price for 20 of the last 30 consecutive trading days of a calendar quarter and under certain other circumstances as more fully described in Note 8 to our consolidated financial statements appearing in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004.

 

We may, at our option, redeem for cash the Convertible Senior Notes in whole or in part at any time on or after June 15, 2009, initially at 101.321% of the principal amount, declining to 100% of the principal amount after June 15, 2011.  Holders have the right to require us to purchase all or any portion of the Convertible Senior Notes for cash on June 15, 2011, June 15, 2014 and June 15, 2019 or if we undergo a fundamental change, as

 

12



 

defined.  In each case, we will pay a purchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes to be purchased plus any accrued and unpaid interest to such purchase date.

 

In November 2003, we issued $200 million 6 ½% Senior Notes due November 2013 (the “Original Notes”) in a private placement pursuant to Rule 144A and Regulation S promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.  The Original Notes were issued at a price of 100% of their face amount (before underwriting discount and other issuance costs).  In May 2004 we completed an offer to exchange all of the outstanding Original Notes for an equal amount of 6 ½% Senior Notes due November 2013 (the “6 ½% Senior Notes”), which were registered under the Securities Act of 1933.  Interest on the 6 ½% Senior Notes is payable semiannually.  We may, at our option, redeem the 6 ½% Senior Notes in whole or in part at any time after November 2008, initially at 103.250% of the principal amount, declining to 100% of the principal amount after November 2011.  We may redeem the 6 ½% Senior Notes, in whole or in part, at any time before November 2008 at a redemption price equal to the principal amount thereof plus a “make-whole” premium, plus accrued and unpaid interest.  A portion of such notes may also be redeemed prior to November 2006 under certain conditions.

 

In April 2002, we issued $350 million 8 3/8% Senior Notes due April 2012 (the “Original Notes”) in a private placement pursuant to Rule 144A and Regulation S promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.  In September 2002 we completed an offer to exchange all of the outstanding Original Notes for an equal amount of 8 3/8% Senior Notes due 2012 (the “8 3/8% Senior Notes”), which were registered under the Securities Act of 1933.  The terms of the 8 3/8% Senior Notes were substantially identical to the terms of the Original Notes.  The Original Notes were issued at a price of 100% of their face amount (before underwriting discount and other issuance costs).  Interest on the 8 3/8% Senior Notes is payable semiannually.  We may, at our option, redeem the 8 3/8% Senior Notes in whole or in part at any time after April 2007, initially at 104.188% of the principal amount, declining to 100% of the principal amount after April 2010.

 

In May 2001, we issued $200 million 8 5/8% Senior Notes due May 2011 (the “8 5/8% Senior Notes”) at a price of 99.178% of their face amount (before underwriting discount and other issuance costs).  Interest on the 8 5/8% Senior Notes is payable semiannually.  We may, at our option, redeem the 8 5/8% Senior Notes in whole or in part at any time after May 2006, initially at 104.3125% of the principal amount, declining to 100% of the principal amount after May 2009.

 

The Convertible Senior Notes, the 6 ½ % Senior Notes, the 8 3/8% Senior Notes and the 8 5/8% Senior Notes (collectively, the “Senior Notes”) are unsecured obligations ranking pari passu with all other existing and future senior indebtedness.  All of our significant subsidiaries are full and unconditional guarantors of the Senior Notes and our obligations under the Credit Facility, and are jointly and severally liable for obligations under the Senior Notes and the Credit Facility.  Each guarantor subsidiary is a 100% owned subsidiary of Beazer Homes.

 

The indentures under which the Senior Notes were issued contain certain restrictive covenants, including limitations on payment of dividends.  At March 31, 2005, under the most restrictive covenants of each indenture, approximately $247.1 million of our retained earnings was available for cash dividends and for share repurchases.  Each indenture provides that, in the event of defined changes in control or if our consolidated tangible net worth falls below a specified level or in certain circumstances upon a sale of assets, we are required to offer to repurchase certain specified amounts of outstanding Senior Notes.

 

13



 

We are exposed to fluctuations in interest rates.  From time to time, we have entered into derivative agreements to manage interest costs and hedge against risks associated with fluctuating interest rates related to $100 million of floating rate debt.  At September 30, 2004, we had swap agreements to effectively fix the interest rate on $100 million in floating rate debt.  As of September 30, 2004, we had recorded a cumulative after-tax other comprehensive loss of $610,000 as a result of the Swap Agreements.  The estimated fair value of the Swap Agreements, based on current market rates, approximated $1.0 million at September 30, 2004 and was included in other liabilities.  The Swap Agreements matured on December 20, 2004.

 

(9) Contingencies

 

Trinity Claims - We and certain of our subsidiaries have been and continue to be named as defendants in various construction defect claims, complaints and other legal actions that include claims related to moisture intrusion and mold.  We have experienced a significant number of such claims in our Midwest region and particularly with respect to homes built by Trinity Homes LLC, a subsidiary which we acquired in the Crossmann acquisition in 2002.

 

As of March 31, 2005, there were 13 pending lawsuits related to such complaints received by Trinity.  Twelve of these involve suits by individual homeowners, and the cost to resolve these matters is not expected to be material, either individually or in the aggregate.  One of these suits is a class action suit that was filed in the State of Indiana in August 2003.  The parties in the class action reached a settlement agreement which was approved by the court on October 20, 2004.

 

The settlement class includes, with certain exclusions, the current owners of all Trinity homes that have brick veneer, where the closing of Trinity’s initial sale of the home took place between June 1, 1998 and October 31, 2002.  The settlement agreement establishes an agreed protocol and process for assessment and remediation of any external water intrusion issues at the homes which includes, among other things, that the homes will be repaired at Trinity’s expense.  The settlement agreement also provides for payment of plaintiffs’ attorneys’ fees and for Trinity to pay an agreed amount for engineering inspection costs for each home for which a claim is filed under the settlement.

 

Under the settlement, subject to Trinity’s timely performance of the specified assessments and remediation activities for homeowners who file claims, each homeowner releases Trinity, Beazer Homes Investment Corp. and other affiliated companies, including Beazer Homes, from the claims asserted in the class action lawsuit, claims arising out of external water intrusion, claims of improper brick installation, including property damage claims, loss or diminution of property value claims, and most personal injury claims, among others.  No appeals of the court’s order approving the settlement were received by the court within the timeframe established by the court.  The Company sent out the claims notices on December 17, 2004, and the class members had until February 15, 2005 to file claims.  A total of 1,311 valid claims were filed (of the 2,161 total class members), of which 613 complaints had been received prior to the Company’s receipt of the claim notices.  Class members who did not file a claim by February 15, 2005 are no longer able to file a class action claim under the settlement or pursue an individual claim against Trinity.

 

Our warranty reserves at March 31, 2005 and September 30, 2004 include accruals for our estimated costs to assess and remediate all homes for which Trinity had received complaints related to moisture intrusion and mold, including a provision for legal fees.  Our warranty reserves at March 31, 2005 also include accruals for

 

14



 

class action claims received, pursuant to the settlement discussed above, from class members who had not previously contacted Trinity with complaints.

 

The following is a rollforward of total complaints received as of each balance sheet date:

 

 

 

Three Months Ended
March 31,

 

Six Months Ended
March 31,

 

 

 

2005

 

2004

 

2005

 

2004

 

Complaints outstanding at beginning of period

 

904

 

511

 

887

 

415

 

Complaints received during the period

 

703

 

248

 

754

 

344

 

Complaints resolved during the period

 

(23

)

 

(57

)

 

Complaints outstanding at end of the period

 

1,584

 

759

 

1,584

 

759

 

 

The cost to assess and remediate a home depends on the extent of moisture damage, if any, that the home has incurred.  We classify homes for which we receive complaints into one of three categories: 1) homes with no moisture damage, 2) homes with isolated moisture damage or 3) homes with extensive moisture damage.

 

As of March 31, 2005 and September 30, 2004, we accrued for our estimated cost to remediate homes that we had assessed and assigned to one of the above categories, as well as our estimated cost to remediate those homes for which we had received complaints, but for which we had not yet performed assessments.  For purposes of our accrual, we have historically assigned homes not yet assessed to categories based on our expectations about the extent of damage and trends observed from the results of assessments performed to date.  In addition, beginning in the quarter ended March 31, 2005, the Company refined its cost estimation process to consider the subdivision of the claimant along with the categorization discussed above.  Once a house is categorized, detailed budgets are used as the basis to prepare our estimated costs to remediate such homes.

 

During fiscal 2004, we initiated a program under which we offered to repurchase a limited number of homes from specific homeowners.  The program was concluded during the first quarter of fiscal 2005.  We have repurchased a total of fifty-four (54) homes under the program.  During the quarter and six months ended March 31, 2005, we sold two and three of the repurchased homes, respectively.  The remaining fifty-one homes were acquired for an aggregate purchase price of $17.2 million.  Our accrual at March 31, 2005 includes our estimated costs to sell homes that we have repurchased, and our estimated losses on the sale of those homes, if any.

 

15



 

Changes in our accrual for Trinity moisture intrusion and related mold issues during the period were as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

Three Months Ended
March 31,

 

Six Months Ended
March 31,

 

 

 

2005

 

2004

 

2005

 

2004

 

Balance at beginning of period

 

$

45,900

 

$

14,014

 

$

42,173

 

$

9,200

 

Provisions

 

45,000

 

11,373

 

55,000

 

18,258

 

Payments

 

(4,165

)

(1,292

)

(10,438

)

(3,363

)

Balance at end of period

 

$

86,735

 

$

24,095

 

$

86,735

 

$

24,095

 

 

Our accruals at March 31, 2005 represent our best estimates of the costs to resolve all asserted complaints.  Actual costs to assess and remediate homes in each category and subdivision, the extent of damage to homes not yet assessed, our estimates of costs to sell repurchased homes, and our losses on such sales could differ from our estimates.  As a result, the costs to resolve existing complaints could differ from our recorded accruals and have a material adverse effect on our earnings in the periods in which the matters are resolved.  Additionally, it is possible that we will incur additional losses related to these matters, including additional losses related to homes for which we have not yet received complaints.  However, the amount or range of such losses cannot be determined at this time.

 

Warranty Reserves - - We provide a limited warranty (ranging from one to two years) of workmanship and materials with each of our homes. Such warranty covers defects in plumbing, electrical, heating, cooling and ventilating systems and construction defects. In addition, we provide a warranty (ranging from a minimum of ten years up to the period covered by the applicable statute of repose) with each of our homes, covering construction defects only. Since we subcontract our homebuilding work to subcontractors who generally provide us with an indemnity and a certificate of insurance prior to receiving payments for their work, claims relating to workmanship and materials are generally the primary responsibility of our subcontractors.

 

As noted above, our warranty reserves at March 31, 2005 and September 30, 2004 include accruals for Trinity moisture intrusion and related mold issues.  Warranty reserves are included in accrued expenses in the consolidated financial statements.  We record reserves covering our anticipated warranty expense for each home closed.  Management reviews the adequacy of warranty reserves each reporting period based on historical experience and management’s estimate of the costs to remediate the claims and adjusts these provisions accordingly.  While we believe that our warranty reserves are adequate, historical data and trends may not accurately predict our actual warranty costs or future developments could lead to a significant change in the reserve.

 

Changes in our warranty reserves, which include amounts related to the Trinity moisture intrusion and mold issues discussed above, during the period are as follows (in thousands):

 

16



 

 

 

Three Months Ended
March 31,

 

Six Months Ended
March 31,

 

 

 

2005

 

2004

 

2005

 

2004

 

Balance at beginning of period

 

$

93,631

 

$

47,939

 

$

86,163

 

$

40,473

 

Provisions

 

53,981

 

19,303

 

72,296

 

35,190

 

Payments

 

(10,897

)

(5,515

)

(21,744

)

(13,936

)

Balance at end of period

 

$

136,715

 

$

61,727

 

$

136,715

 

$

61,727

 

 

Other Contingencies - The Company and certain of its subsidiaries have been named as defendants in various claims, complaints and other legal actions, including relating to moisture intrusion and related mold claims, construction defects and product liability.  Certain of the liabilities resulting from these actions are covered by insurance.  With respect to certain general liability exposures, including construction defect, moisture intrusion and related mold claims and product liability, interpretation of underlying current and future trends, assessment of claims and the related liability and reserve estimation process is highly judgmental due to the complex nature of these exposures, with each exposure exhibiting unique circumstances.  In particular, for construction defect liability there is a high degree of uncertainty relating to whether insurance coverage exists, when losses occur, the size of each loss, expectations for future interpretive rulings concerning contract provisions and the extent to which the assertion of these claims will expand geographically.  In our opinion, based on our current assessment, the ultimate resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

 

(10) Income Taxes

 

A provision for income taxes for the three and six month periods ended March 31, 2005 has been recorded at an estimated effective income tax rate exclusive of the goodwill impairment charge as such charge is not tax deductible.  Our effective income tax rate, exclusive of the goodwill impairment charge was 37.87% and 38.25% for the three and six month periods ended March 31, 2005, respectively.  Our effective tax rate was 39.0% for the three and six month periods ended March 31, 2004.

 

(11)  Supplemental Guarantor Information

 

As discussed in Note 8, Beazer Homes’ obligations to pay principal, premium, if any, and interest under certain debt are guaranteed on a joint and several basis by substantially all of its subsidiaries.  The guarantees are full and unconditional and the guarantor subsidiaries are 100% owned by Beazer Homes USA, Inc.  The Company has determined that separate, full financial statements of the guarantors would not be material to investors and, accordingly, supplemental financial information for the guarantors is presented.

 

17



 

Beazer Homes USA, Inc.

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet

March 31, 2005

(in thousands)

 

 

 

Beazer
Homes
USA, Inc.

 

Guarantor
Subsidiaries

 

Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries

 

Eliminating
Entries

 

Consolidated
Beazer
Homes
USA, Inc.

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

76,405

 

$

(60,751

)

$

276

 

$

 

$

15,930

 

Accounts receivable

 

 

73,590

 

915

 

 

74,505

 

Owned Inventory

 

 

2,524,219

 

 

8,159

 

2,532,378

 

Consolidated inventory not owned

 

 

182,813

 

 

 

182,813

 

Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures

 

 

76,638

 

 

 

76,638

 

Deferred tax asset

 

46,698

 

 

 

 

46,698

 

Property, plant and equipment, net

 

 

25,514

 

 

 

25,514

 

Goodwill

 

 

121,368

 

 

 

121,368

 

Investments in subsidiaries

 

1,328,172

 

 

 

(1,328,172

)

 

Intercompany

 

925,514

 

(944,840

)

19,326

 

 

 

Other assets

 

17,879

 

27,276

 

10,150

 

 

55,305

 

Total Assets

 

$

2,394,668

 

$

2,025,827

 

$

30,667

 

$

(1,320,013

)

$

3,131,149

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Trade accounts payable

 

$

 

$

132,643

 

$

60

 

$

 

$

132,703

 

Other liabilities

 

62,102

 

403,513

 

11,333

 

3,121

 

480,069

 

Intercompany

 

(3,183

)

 

3,183

 

 

 

Obligations related to consolidated inventory not owned

 

 

147,928

 

 

 

147,928

 

Term Loan

 

200,000

 

 

 

 

200,000

 

Senior notes

 

916,090

 

 

 

 

916,090

 

Other notes payable

 

 

34,700

 

 

 

34,700

 

Total Liabilities

 

1,175,009

 

718,784

 

14,576

 

3,121

 

1,911,490

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stockholders’ Equity

 

1,219,659

 

1,307,043

 

16,091

 

(1,323,134

)

1,219,659

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

 

$

2,394,668

 

$

2,025,827

 

$

30,667

 

$

(1,320,013

)

$

3,131,149

 

 

18



 

Beazer Homes USA, Inc.

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet

September 30, 2004

(in thousands)

 

 

 

Beazer
Homes
USA, Inc.

 

Guarantor
Subsidiaries

 

Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries

 

Eliminating
Entries

 

Consolidated
Beazer
Homes
USA, Inc.

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

392,110

 

$

(71,569

)

$

339

 

$

 

$

320,880

 

Accounts receivable

 

 

70,237

 

337

 

 

70,574

 

Owned inventory

 

 

2,079,494

 

 

9,836

 

2,089,330

 

Consolidated inventory not owned

 

 

254,765

 

 

 

254,765

 

Investment in unconsolidated joint ventures

 

 

44,748

 

 

 

44,748

 

Deferred tax asset

 

47,052

 

 

 

 

47,052

 

Property, plant and equipment, net

 

 

24,671

 

 

 

24,671

 

Goodwill

 

 

251,603

 

 

 

251,603

 

Investments in subsidiaries

 

1,468,078

 

 

 

(1,468,078

)

 

Intercompany

 

566,216

 

(583,038

)

16,822

 

 

 

Other assets

 

19,432

 

17,881

 

8,526

 

 

45,839

 

Total Assets

 

$

2,492,888

 

$

2,088,792

 

$

26,024

 

$

(1,458,242

)

$

3,149,462

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Trade accounts payable

 

$

 

$

123,174

 

$

113

 

$

 

$

123,287

 

Other liabilities

 

146,473

 

276,242

 

11,057

 

3,836

 

437,608

 

Intercompany

 

(1,043

)

 

1,043

 

 

 

Obligations related to consolidated inventory not owned

 

 

219,042

 

 

 

219,042

 

Term Loan

 

200,000

 

 

 

 

200,000

 

Senior Notes

 

915,337

 

 

 

 

915,337

 

Other notes payable

 

 

22,067

 

 

 

22,067

 

Total Liabilities

 

1,260,767

 

640,525

 

12,213

 

3,836

 

1,917,341

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stockholders’ Equity

 

1,232,121

 

1,448,267

 

13,811

 

(1,462,078

)

1,232,121

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

 

$

2,492,888

 

$

2,088,792

 

$

26,024

 

$

(1,458,242

)

$

3,149,462

 

 

19



 

Beazer Homes USA, Inc.

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations

Three Months Ended March 31, 2005

(in thousands)

 

 

 

Beazer
Homes
USA, Inc.

 

Guarantor
Subsidiaries

 

Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries

 

Eliminating
Entries

 

Consolidated
Beazer
Homes
USA, Inc.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total revenue

 

$

 

$

974,927

 

$

1,321

 

$

 

$

976,248

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Costs and expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Home construction and land sales

 

21,082

 

774,975

 

 

 

796,057

 

Selling, general and administrative

 

 

111,378

 

422

 

(3,730

)

108,070

 

Goodwill impairment charge

 

 

130,235

 

 

 

130,235

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating (loss) income

 

(21,082

)

(41,661

)

899

 

3,730

 

(58,114

)

Equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures

 

 

301

 

 

 

301

 

Other income, net

 

 

1,436

 

 

 

1,436

 

(Loss) Income before income taxes

 

(21,082

)

(39,924

)

899

 

3,730

 

(56,377

)

Provision for income taxes

 

(8,064

)

34,260

 

344

 

1,427

 

27,967

 

Equity in income of subsidiaries

 

(71,326

)

 

 

71,326

 

 

Net (loss) income

 

$

(84,344

)

$

(74,184

)

$

555

 

$

73,629

 

$

(84,344

)

 

Beazer Homes USA, Inc.

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations

Three Months Ended March 31, 2004

(in thousands)

 

 

 

Beazer
Homes
USA, Inc.

 

Guarantor
Subsidiaries

 

Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries

 

Eliminating
Entries

 

Consolidated
Beazer
Homes
USA, Inc.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total revenue

 

$

 

$

874,990

 

$

1,591

 

$

 

$

876,581

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Costs and expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Home construction and land sales

 

18,532

 

683,833

 

 

(3,345

)

699,020

 

Selling, general and administrative

 

 

99,018

 

699

 

 

99,717

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating (loss) income

 

(18,532

)

92,139

 

892

 

3,345

 

77,844

 

Equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures

 

 

378

 

 

 

378

 

Other income, net

 

 

1,872

 

 

 

1,872

 

(Loss) Income before income taxes

 

(18,532

)

94,389

 

892

 

3,345

 

80,094

 

Provision for income taxes

 

(7,227

)

36,811

 

348

 

1,305

 

31,236

 

Equity in income of subsidiaries

 

60,163

 

 

 

(60,163

)

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

48,858

 

$

57,578

 

$

544

 

$

(58,123

)

$

48,858

 

 

20



 

Beazer Homes USA, Inc.

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations

Six Months Ended March 31, 2005

(in thousands)

 

 

 

Beazer
Homes
USA, Inc.

 

Guarantor
Subsidiaries

 

Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries

 

Eliminating
Entries

 

Consolidated
Beazer
Homes
USA, Inc.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total revenue

 

$

 

$

1,885,141

 

$

2,934

 

$

 

$

1,888,075

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Costs and expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Home construction and land sales

 

41,471

 

1,450,941

 

 

 

1,492,412

 

Selling, general and administrative

 

 

219,979

 

844

 

(8,159

)

212,664

 

Goodwill Impairment Charge

 

 

130,235

 

 

 

130,235

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating (loss) income

 

(41,471

)

83,986

 

2,090

 

8,159

 

52,764

 

Equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures

 

 

199

 

 

 

199

 

Other income, net

 

 

4,000

 

 

 

4,000

 

(Loss) income before income taxes

 

(41,471

)

88,185

 

2,090

 

8,159

 

56,963

 

Provision for income taxes

 

(15,863

)

83,543

 

802

 

3,121

 

71,603

 

Equity in income of subsidiaries

 

10,968

 

 

 

(10,968

)

 

Net (loss) income

 

$

(14,640

)

$

4,642

 

$

1,288

 

$

(5,930

)

$

(14,640

)

 

Beazer Homes USA, Inc.

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations

Six Months Ended March 31, 2004

(in thousands)

 

 

 

Beazer
Homes
USA, Inc.

 

Guarantor
Subsidiaries

 

Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries

 

Eliminating
Entries

 

Consolidated
Beazer
Homes
USA, Inc.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total revenue

 

$

 

$

1,683,102

 

$

3,587

 

$

 

$

1,686,689

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Costs and expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Home construction and land sales

 

35,403

 

1,315,095

 

 

(6,529

)

1,343,969

 

Selling, general and administrative

 

 

187,745

 

1,479

 

 

189,224

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating (loss) income

 

(35,403

)

180,262

 

2,108

 

6,529

 

153,496

 

Equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures

 

 

935

 

 

 

935

 

Other income, net

 

 

3,017

 

 

 

3,017

 

(Loss) income before income taxes

 

(35,403

)

184,214

 

2,108

 

6,529

 

157,448

 

Provision for income taxes

 

(13,807

)

71,842

 

823

 

2,546

 

61,404

 

Equity in income of subsidiaries

 

117,640

 

 

 

 

 

(117,640

)

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

96,044

 

$

112,372

 

$

1,285

 

$

(113,657

)

$

96,044

 

 

21



 

Beazer Homes USA, Inc.

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows

Six Months Ended March 31, 2005

(in thousands)

 

 

 

Beazer
Homes
USA, Inc.

 

Guarantor
Subsidiaries

 

Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries

 

Eliminating
Entries

 

Consolidated
Beazer
Homes
USA, Inc.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities

 

$

(320,867

)

$

68,328

 

$

(1,050

)

$

 

$

(253,589

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from investing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Capital expenditures

 

 

(5,968

)

 

 

(5,968

)

Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures

 

 

(40,483

)

 

 

(40,483

)

Distributions from unconsolidated joint ventures

 

 

8,792

 

 

 

8,792

 

Net cash used by investing activities

 

 

(37,659

)

 

 

(37,659

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Repayment of other notes payable

 

(9,443

)

 

 

 

(9,443

)

Proceeds from stock option exercises

 

1,280

 

 

 

 

1,280

 

Advances to/from subsidiaries

 

18,864

 

(19,851

)

987

 

 

 

Dividends paid

 

(5,539

)

 

 

 

(5,539

)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

 

5,162

 

(19,851

)

987

 

 

(13,702

)

(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents

 

(315,705

)

10,818

 

(63

)

 

(304,950

)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

 

392,110

 

(71,569

)

339

 

 

320,880

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

 

$

76,405

 

$

(60,751

)

$

276

 

$

 

$

15,930

 

 

22



 

Beazer Homes USA, Inc.

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows

Six Months Ended March 31, 2004

(in thousands)

 

 

 

Beazer
Homes
USA, Inc.

 

Guarantor
Subsidiaries

 

Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries

 

Eliminating
Entries

 

Consolidated
Beazer
Homes
USA, Inc.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net cash (used) provided by operating activities

 

$

(21,288

)

$

(155,585

)

$

277

 

$

 

$

(176,596

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from investing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Capital expenditures

 

 

(3,926

)

 

 

(3,926

)

Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures

 

 

(3,116

)

 

 

 

 

(3,116

)

Distributions from unconsolidated joint ventures

 

 

3,183

 

 

 

3,183

 

Net cash used by investing activities

 

 

(3,859

)

 

 

(3,859

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from issuance of 6 1/2% Senior Notes

 

198,100

 

 

 

 

198,100

 

Advances to/from subsidiaries

 

(137,948

)

140,639

 

(2,691

)

 

 

Debt issuance costs

 

(460

)

 

 

 

(460

)

Proceeds from stock option exercises

 

1,728

 

 

 

 

1,728

 

Dividends paid

 

(2,726

)

 

 

 

(2,726

)

Net cash provided (used) by financing activities

 

58,694

 

140,639

 

(2,691

)

 

196,642

 

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

 

37,406

 

(18,805

)

(2,414

)

 

16,187

 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

 

110,754

 

(40,079

)

2,697

 

 

73,372

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

 

$

148,160

 

$

(58,884

)

$

283

 

$

 

$

89,559

 

 

 

Item 2.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

OVERVIEW:

 

Homebuilding:  We design, sell and build single-family homes in the following regions and states:

 

Southeast

 

West

 

Central

 

Mid-Atlantic

 

Midwest

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Florida

 

Arizona

 

Texas

 

Maryland / Delaware

 

Indiana

Georgia

 

California

 

 

 

New Jersey / New York

 

Kentucky

Mississippi

 

Colorado

 

 

 

Pennsylvania

 

Ohio

North Carolina

 

Nevada

 

 

 

Virginia / West Virginia

 

 

South Carolina

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tennessee

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

We intend, subject to market conditions, to expand in our current markets and to consider entering new markets either through expansion from existing markets or through acquisitions of established regional homebuilders.  We seek to be one of the five largest builders in each of the markets that we serve.

 

23



 

We design our homes at various price points to appeal to homebuyers across various demographic segments.  Our objective is to provide our customers at each price-point with homes that incorporate exceptional value and quality while seeking to maximize our return on invested capital. To achieve this objective, we have developed a business strategy which focuses on the following elements:

 

Geographic Diversity and Growth Markets.  We compete in a large number of geographically diverse markets in an attempt to reduce our exposure to any particular regional economy.  Most of the markets in which we operate have experienced significant population growth in recent years.  Within these markets, we build homes in a variety of projects.  Our business strategy entails further increasing our market penetration across the geographically diverse markets in which we compete.

 

Leverage of National Brand.  In October 2003, we launched a branding strategy that is designed to build a unified consumer brand across all markets in which we operate. Our new national branding strategy presents us as one company with one name, one logo, one message and one purpose. We believe that a national branding strategy will differentiate us from our competitors by promoting qualities that lead to good recommendations, referrals to family and friends, and repeat purchases by loyal customers. We feel that a strengthened, national brand identity will better position us to consistently address the needs of our customers across all of our markets.

 

Leverage Size, Scale and Capabilities to Achieve Optimal Efficiencies.  The Company has implemented specific profitability initiatives which focus on leveraging our size, scale and capabilities in order to achieve enhanced gross profit and operating profit margins.  These initiatives include:

 

•    leveraging our size to create economies of scale in purchasing and construction;

•    standardizing best practices and product designs;

•    using branding and increased market penetration to maximize efficiency of land use; and

•    leveraging our fixed cost infrastructure by increasing depth and breadth in markets where we have an established presence.

 

Quality Homes at Various Price-Points to Meet the Needs of Increasingly Diverse Homebuyers.  We seek to maximize customer satisfaction by offering homes which incorporate quality materials, distinctive design features, convenient locations and competitive prices.  During the quarter and six months ended March 31, 2005, the average sales price of our homes closed was approximately $266,700 and $259,700, respectively.  Our product strategy entails addressing the needs of an increasingly diverse profile of buyers as evidenced by demographic trends including, among others, increased immigration, changing profiles of households, the aging of the baby-boomers, and the rise of the echo-boomers (children of the baby-boomers) into the ranks of homeownership.  Our product offering is broken down into the following product categories:

 

Economy.  These homes are targeted primarily at entry-level buyers, are generally 1,500 square feet or less in size, and are intended to meet the needs of those buyers for whom price is the most important factor in the buying decision.

 

Value.  These homes are targeted at entry-level and move-up buyers, generally range from 1,500 to 2,500 square feet in size, and are intended to appeal to buyers who are more interested in style and features, but are still somewhat price-focused.

 

24



 

Style.  These homes are targeted at more affluent move-up buyers, are generally greater than 2,500 square feet in size, and are intended to appeal to buyers in the more luxurious segment of the market, who place greater emphasis on style and features.

 

In addition, we also offer homes to the ‘active-adult’ segment which are targeted to buyers over 55 years of age, in communities with special amenities.  We offer these homes within the Economy, Value and Style categories described above.  Within each product category, we seek to provide exceptional value and to ensure an enjoyable customer experience.

 

Additional Products and Services for HomebuyersIn order to maximize our profitability and provide our customers with the additional products and services that they desire, we have incorporated design centers and mortgage origination operations into our business.  Recognizing that our customers want to choose certain components of their new home, we offer limited customization through the use of design studios in most of our markets.  These design studios allow the customer to select certain non-structural customizations for their homes such as cabinetry, flooring, fixtures, appliances and wall coverings.  Additionally, recognizing the homebuyer’s desire to simplify the financing process, we originate mortgages on behalf of our customers through our subsidiary Beazer Mortgage Corporation, or Beazer Mortgage. Beazer Mortgage originates, processes and brokers mortgages to third party investors. Beazer Mortgage generally does not retain or service the mortgages that it brokers. We also provide title services to our customers in many of our markets.

 

Critical Accounting Policies:  Some of our critical accounting policies require the use of judgment in their application or require estimates of inherently uncertain matters. Although our accounting policies are in compliance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, a change in the facts and circumstances of the underlying transactions could significantly change the application of the accounting policies and the resulting financial statement impact.  Listed below are those policies that we believe are critical and require the use of complex judgment in their application.

 

Inventory Valuation

Housing projects and land held for development and sale are stated at cost (including direct construction costs, capitalized indirect costs, capitalized interest and real estate taxes) unless facts and circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the assets may be impaired. We assess these assets for recoverability in accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets”. SFAS No. 144 requires that long-lived assets be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets is measured by comparing the carrying amount of an asset to future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If these assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets.

 

These evaluations for impairment are significantly impacted by estimates of revenues, costs and expenses and other factors.  Due to uncertainties in the estimation process, it is reasonably possible that actual results could differ from those estimates.  Our assumptions about future home sales prices and volumes require significant judgment because the residential homebuilding industry is cyclical and is highly sensitive to changes in economic conditions. We continue to evaluate the carrying value of our inventory and, based on historical results, believe that our existing estimation process is accurate and do not anticipate the process to materially change in the future.

 

25



 

Goodwill

 

We test goodwill for impairment annually or more frequently if an event occurs or circumstances change that more likely than not reduce the value of a reporting unit below its carrying value. For purposes of goodwill impairment testing, we compare the fair value of each reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. Each of our operating divisions is considered a reporting unit. The fair value of each reporting unit is determined based on expected discounted future cash flows.   If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, goodwill is considered impaired.  If goodwill is considered impaired, the impairment loss to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the goodwill exceeds implied fair value of that goodwill.  The Company’s annual impairment test is performed as of April 30.  For purposes of our goodwill impairment test, we obtained independent valuations of our reporting units.

 

Inherent in our fair value determinations are certain judgments and estimates, including projections of future cash flows, the discount rate reflecting the risk inherent in future cash flows, the interpretation of current economic indicators and market valuations and our strategic plans with regard to our operations.  A change in these underlying assumptions would cause a change in the results of the tests, which could cause the fair value of one or more reporting units to be less than their respective carrying amounts.  In addition, to the extent that there are significant changes in market conditions or overall economic conditions or our strategic plans change, it is possible that future goodwill impairment charge could result, which could have a material effect on our financial position and results of operations.

 

Our goodwill has been assigned to reporting units in different geographic locations.  Therefore, potential goodwill impairment charges resulting from changes in local market and /or local economic conditions or changes in our strategic plans may be isolated to one or a few of our reporting units.   However, our business is concentrated in the homebuilding industry and, as such, a widespread decline in the homebuilding industry or a significant deterioration of economic conditions could have a negative impact on the estimated fair value of a larger number of our reporting units.

 

During the quarter ended March 31, 2005 we recorded a $130.2 million non-cash non tax-deductible impairment charge to write off substantially all of the goodwill allocated to certain underperforming markets in Indiana, Ohio, Kentucky and Charlotte, North Carolina.  The goodwill had been recorded as a result of our April 2002 acquisition of Crossmann Communities.  The forecasts and valuations of the respective divisions, along with weaker than anticipated local economies, particularly in the Midwest markets, and severe price competition, particularly at entry level price points, led us to conclude the goodwill was impaired in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 142.

 

Homebuilding Revenues and Costs

Revenue from the sale of a home is recognized when the closing has occurred and the risk of ownership is transferred to the buyer.  All associated homebuilding costs are charged to cost of sales in the period when the revenues from home closings are recognized.  Homebuilding costs include land and land development costs (based upon an allocation of such costs, including costs to complete the development, or specific lot costs), home construction costs (including an estimate of costs, if any, to complete home construction), previously capitalized indirect costs (principally for construction supervision), capitalized interest and estimated warranty costs.  Sales commissions are included in selling, general and administrative expense when the closing has occurred.  All other costs are expensed as incurred.

 

26



 

Warranty Reserves

 

We provide a limited warranty (ranging from one to two years) of workmanship and materials with each of our homes. Such warranty covers defects in plumbing, electrical, heating, cooling and ventilating systems and construction defects. In addition, we provide a warranty (ranging from a minimum of ten years up to the period covered by the applicable statute of repose) with each of our homes, covering construction defects only. Since we subcontract our homebuilding work to subcontractors who generally provide us with an indemnity and a certificate of insurance prior to receiving payments for their work, claims relating to workmanship and materials are generally the primary responsibility of our subcontractors.

 

Warranty reserves are included in accrued expenses in the consolidated financial statements.  We record reserves covering our anticipated warranty expense for each home closed.  Management reviews the adequacy of warranty reserves each reporting period based on historical experience and management’s estimate of the costs to remediate the claims and adjusts these provisions accordingly.  Factors that affect our warranty liability include the number of homes sold, historical and anticipated rates of warranty claims, and cost per claim. Based on historical results, we believe that our existing estimation process is accurate and do not anticipate the process to materially change in the future.  Our warranty reserves at March 31, 2005 and September 30, 2004 include accruals for certain moisture intrusion issues.  Our estimation process for such accruals is discussed in Note 9 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.  While we believe that our warranty reserves at March 31, 2005 are adequate, historical data and trends may not accurately predict our actual warranty costs or that future developments could lead to a significant change in the reserve.

 

27



 

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS:

 

The following presents certain operating and financial data for Beazer Homes (dollars in thousands):

 

 

 

Three Months Ended
March 31,

 

Six Months Ended
March 31,

 

 

 

2005

 

2004

 

2005

 

2004

 

 

 

 

 

%

 

 

 

 

 

%

 

 

 

 

 

Amount

 

Change

 

Amount

 

Amount

 

Change

 

Amount

 

Number of new orders,  net of cancellations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Southeast region

 

1,701

 

4.0

%

1,636

 

2,892

 

8.0

%

2,679

 

West region

 

1,927

 

2.2

 

1,885

 

3,256

 

(2.5

)

3,339

 

Central region

 

406

 

15.7

 

351

 

643

 

20.0

 

536

 

Mid-Atlantic region

 

561

 

39.2

 

403

 

1,068

 

48.5

 

719

 

Midwest region

 

644

 

(14.9

)

757

 

925

 

(13.0

)

1,063

 

Total

 

5,239

 

4.1

 

5,032

 

8,784

 

5.4

 

8,336

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of closings:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Southeast region

 

1,196

 

(0.1

)%

1,197

 

2,435

 

(0.8

)%

2,454

 

West region

 

1,358

 

(3.3

)

1,404

 

2,550

 

(2.6

)

2,618

 

Central region

 

267

 

28.4

 

208

 

457

 

2.0

 

448

 

Mid-Atlantic region

 

366

 

(0.3

)

367

 

736

 

7.4

 

685

 

Midwest region

 

415

 

(18.3

)

508

 

998

 

(8.2

)

1,087

 

Total

 

3,602

 

(2.2

)

3,684

 

7,176

 

(1.6

)

7,292

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total homebuilding revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Southeast region

 

$

240,893

 

6.8

%

$

225,636

 

$

477,151

 

6.5

%

$

448,148

 

West region

 

452,888

 

15.8

 

391,157

 

870,377

 

18.2

 

736,277

 

Central region

 

43,076

 

26.4

 

34,074

 

74,919

 

6.1

 

70,587

 

Mid-Atlantic region

 

157,514

 

25.0

 

125,965

 

286,185

 

26.5

 

226,174

 

Midwest region

 

66,167

 

(12.9

)

75,980

 

154,780

 

(4.3

)

161,764

 

Total

 

$

960,538

 

12.6

 

$

852,812

 

$

1,863,412

 

13.4

 

$

1,642,950

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average sales price per home closed:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Southeast region

 

$

201.4

 

6.8

%

$

188.5

 

$

196.0

 

7.3

%

$

182.6

 

West region

 

333.5

 

19.7

 

278.6

 

341.3

 

21.4

 

281.2

 

Central region

 

161.3

 

(1.5

)

163.8

 

163.9

 

4.0

 

157.6

 

Mid-Atlantic region

 

430.4

 

25.4

 

343.2

 

388.8

 

17.7

 

330.2

 

Midwest region

 

159.4

 

6.6

 

149.6

 

155.1

 

4.2

 

148.8

 

Company average

 

266.7

 

15.2

 

231.5

 

259.7

 

15.3

 

225.3

 

 

28



 

 

 

March 31,

 

 

 

2005

 

2004

 

 

 

 

 

%

 

 

 

 

 

Amount

 

Change

 

Amount

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Backlog units at end of period:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Southeast region

 

3,086

 

21.2

%

2,546

 

West region

 

3,846

 

27.9

 

3,008

 

Central region

 

615

 

27.1

 

484

 

Mid-Atlantic region

 

1,379

 

19.8

 

1,151

 

Midwest region

 

1,138

 

(11.2

)

1,281

 

Total

 

10,064

 

18.8

 

8,470

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aggregate sales value of homes in backlog at end of period:

 

$

2,898,247

 

42.3

%

$

2,036,493

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of active subdivisions at end of period:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Southeast region

 

166

 

(9.8

)%

184

 

West region

 

101

 

3.1

 

98

 

Central region

 

51

 

15.9

 

44

 

Mid-Atlantic region

 

58

 

13.7

 

51

 

Midwest region

 

130

 

(0.8

)

131

 

Total

 

506

 

(0.4

)

508

 

 

New Orders and Backlog: New orders increased by 4.1% during the three month period ended March 31, 2005, compared to the same period in the prior year. The growth in new home orders for the quarter resulted from increases in the Company’s Southeast, Central, West and Mid-Atlantic regions.  Order growth in the Southeast was driven by increases in Georgia, Tennessee, parts of the Carolinas, and parts of Florida.  Orders were up in all markets in the Central and Mid-Atlantic regions and in Arizona, Colorado, and Nevada in the West region.  This growth was partially offset by lower orders in the Midwest region and the Charlotte market.

 

New orders increased by 5.4% during the six month period ended March 31, 2005, compared to the same period in the prior year.  Orders increased by 48.5% in our Mid-Atlantic region and 20.0% in our Central region compared to the same six-month period a year ago.  Orders declined by 13.0% in our Midwest region, primarily attributable to declines in Indiana and Ohio.

 

The aggregate dollar value of homes in backlog at March 31, 2005 increased 42.3% from March 31, 2004, reflecting an 18.8% increase in the number of homes in backlog and a 19.8% increase in the average price of homes in backlog, from $240,400 at March 31, 2004 to $288,000 at March 31, 2005.  The increase in the number of homes in backlog is driven primarily by continued strong order trends in our Mid-Atlantic and Central regions and most of our Southeast region.  The increase in average price of homes in backlog is due to our ability to raise prices in most of our markets, particularly in our West, Mid-Atlantic and Southeast regions, as well as a greater proportion of backlog in our West region, where prices are generally higher compared to other regions, and a lower proportion of backlog in our Midwest region, where prices are generally lower.

 

29



 

Performance in our Midwest and Charlotte markets continues to be disappointing.  In our Midwest region, new orders were down 14.9% for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, as compared to the quarter ended March 31, 2004.  Backlog units and dollar value at March 31, 2005 were down 11.2% and 9.9%, respectively, at March 31, 2005 as compared to March 31, 2004.  Soft economic conditions in these markets and a high degree of competition, particularly at entry level price points, continue to adversely impact results.

 

The following table provides additional details of revenues and certain expenses and shows certain items expressed as a percentage of certain components of revenues (in thousands):

 

 

 

Three Months Ended
March 31,

 

Six Months Ended
March 31,

 

 

 

2005

 

2004

 

2005

 

2004

 

Details of revenues and certain expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Home sales (1)

 

$

960,538

 

$

853,638

 

$

1,863,412

 

$

1,646,935

 

Land and lot sales

 

7,763

 

13,831

 

8,978

 

21,566

 

Mortgage origination revenue

 

11,310

 

12,294

 

22,164

 

24,440

 

Intercompany elimination - mortgage

 

(3,363

)

(3,182

)

(6,479

)

(6,252

)

Total revenue

 

$

976,248

 

$

876,581

 

$

1,888,075

 

$

1,686,689

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost of home construction and land sales:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Home sales (1), (2)

 

$

794,455

 

$

690,210

 

$

1,492,754

 

$

1,330,327

 

Land and lot sales

 

4,965

 

11,992

 

6,137

 

19,894

 

Intercompany elimination - mortgage

 

(3,363

)

(3,182

)

(6,479

)

(6,252

)

Total cost of home construction and land sales

 

$

796,057

 

$

699,020

 

$

1,492,412

 

$

1,343,969

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selling, general and administrative:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Homebuilding operations

 

$

99,436

 

$

91,994

 

$

196,249

 

$

174,107

 

Mortgage origination operations

 

8,634

 

7,723

 

16,415

 

15,117

 

Total selling, general and administrative

 

$

108,070

 

$

99,717

 

$

212,664

 

$

189,224

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Certain items as a percentage of revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As a percentage of total revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Costs of home construction and land sales (2)

 

81.5

%

79.7

%

79.0

%

79.7

%

Selling, general and administrative:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Homebuilding operations

 

10.2

%

10.5

%

10.4

%

10.3

%

Mortgage operations

 

0.9

%

0.9

%

0.9

%

0.9

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As a percentage of home sales revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Costs of home construction (2)

 

82.7

%

80.9

%

80.1

%

80.8

%

 


(1) Homebuilding revenues for the three and six months ended March 31, 2004 reflect the recognition on a consolidated basis of $0.8 and $4.0 million, respectively, of  revenues related to closings that occurred in fiscal 2003, but for which funding was not received until fiscal 2004.  During fiscal 2003, revenues and related cost of sales were not recognized on those closings where the buyers’ initial investments were not sufficient to recognize profit at the time of closing.  We received funding on such closings pursuant to commitments from bond authority programs in fiscal 2004, at which time we recognized the revenues and related cost of sales.

(2) The costs of home contruction for the three and six months ended March 31, 2005, include charges of $45.0 million and $55.0 million relating to construction defect claims from water intrusion at Trinity Homes LLC.  Similar charges were $11.4 and and $18.3 million for the quarter and six months ended March 31, 2004.

 

30



 

Revenues: Revenues increased by 11.4% for the three months ended March 31, 2005 compared to the same period in the prior year.  Homes closed decreased by 2.2% while the average sales price of homes closed increased by 15.2%Home closings increased in the Company’s Central region and in parts of the Mid-Atlantic and Southeast regions, notably Maryland, Tampa, North Carolina and parts of Florida.  These increases were offset by closing delays in parts of the Southeast region, which continues to be impacted by production delays associated with hurricane activity during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004, and in parts of the West region where heavy rains in Arizona, California, and Nevada during the second quarter negatively impacted production.  Average sales price increased in the Southeast, West, and Mid-Atlantic regions due primarily to strong demand and constraints on the supply of available housing in many of our markets.  Prices increased most significantly in our West and Mid-Atlantic regions, and particularly in Nevada and Virginia, respectively.

 

Revenues increased by 11.9% for the six months ended March 31, 2005 compared to the same period in the prior year.  Homes closed decreased by 1.6% while the average sales price of homes closed increased by 15.3%Home closings increased in the Company’s Mid-Atlantic and Central regions and in parts of the Southeast, notably parts of North Carolina, Tennessee and Florida.  These increases were partially offset by declines in Nevada and Arizona in the West region, Virginia in the Mid-Atlantic region, and parts of Florida and the Carolinas that continue to be impacted by production delays associated with hurricane activity during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004.  Average sales price increased in all regions due primarily to strong demand and constraints on the supply of available housing in many of our markets.  Year to date, prices increased most significantly in our West region, and particularly in California and Nevada.

 

Cost of Home Construction: The cost of home construction as a percentage of home sales revenue increased by 185 basis points for the three month period ended March 31, 2005, compared to the same period of the prior year.   The increase results from the inclusion of warranty costs associated with construction defect claims from water intrusion at Trinity Homes LLC of $45.0 million, compared to $11.4 million in the same period a year ago.  For further discussion of these additional warranty expenses, please refer to Note 9 of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

The cost of home construction as a percentage of home sales revenue decreased by 67 basis points for the six month period ended March 31, 2005, compared to the same period of the prior year.   The decrease was driven by the execution of profit improvement and price point diversification initiatives and a strong pricing environment in several markets.  The resulting decrease was offset by the inclusion of warranty costs associated with construction defect claims from water intrusion at Trinity Homes LLC of $55.0 million, compared to $18.3 million in the same period a year ago.  For further discussion of these additional warranty expenses, please refer to Note 9 of the condensed consolidated financial statements.  In addition, the cost of home construction included an increase in accruals of $14.0 million during the three month period ended March 31, 2005 related to construction defect claims not associated with the Trinity water intrusion matter.

 

Selling, General and Administrative Expense: Our selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expense as a percentage of total revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2005 decreased by 31 basis points compared to the same period of the prior year.

 

Our selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expense as a percentage of total revenues for the six months ended March 31, 2005 increased by four basis points compared to the same period of the prior year.

 

31



 

Goodwill Impairment Charge:  During the quarter ended March 31, 2005, we recorded a $130.2 million non-cash, non tax-deductible impairment charge to write off substantially all of the goodwill allocated to certain underperforming markets in Indiana, Ohio, Kentucky and Charlotte, North Carolina.  The goodwill had been recorded as a result of our April 2002 acquisition of Crossmann Communities.  The fair value of each reporting unit is determined based on expected discounted future cash flows.  The forecasts and valuations of the respective divisions, along with weaker than anticipated local economies, particularly in the Midwest markets, and severe price competition, particularly at entry level price points, led us to conclude the goodwill was impaired in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 142.

 

Income Taxes:  A provision for income taxes for the three and six month periods ended March 31, 2005 has been recorded at an estimated effective income tax rate exclusive of the goodwill impairment charge as such charge is not tax deductible.  Our effective income tax rate, exclusive of the goodwill impairment charge was 37.87% and 38.25% for the three and six month periods ended March 31, 2005, respectively.  Our effective tax rate was 39.0% for the three and six month periods ended March 31, 2004.

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements:

 

In September 2004 the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) of the FASB reached a consensus on EITF Issue No. 04-8: “The Effect of Contingently Convertible Debt on Diluted Earnings Per Share” (“EITF 04-8”).  The consensus was ratified by the FASB in October 2004.  EITF 04-8 requires that shares issuable upon conversion of contingently convertible debt instruments (“Co-Cos”) be included in diluted earnings per share computations using the “if-converted method” regardless of whether the issuer’s stock price exceeds the contingent conversion price.  Prior to EITF 04-8, shares issuable upon conversion of Co-Cos were generally excluded from diluted earnings per share computations until the issuer’s stock price exceeded the contingent conversion price.   EITF 04-8, which applies to our 4 5/8 % Convertible Senior Notes issued in June 2004, became effective for reporting periods ending on or after December 15, 2004, the first quarter of fiscal 2005.  Restatement of prior period earnings per share amounts presented for comparative purposes was required.   The calculation of diluted loss per share for the quarter and six months ended March 31, 2005, as calculated in Note 7 of the condensed consolidated financial statements, excludes the impact of the assumed conversion of restrictive shares, stock options, and our 4 5/8% Convertible Senior Notes because their inclusion would have been antidilutive.

 

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS 123(R) “Share-Based Payment”.  SFAS 123(R) requires the fair value of all share based payment transactions to be recognized in the financial statements.  As a result, upon adoption of SFAS 123(R) we will be required to recognize compensation expense for the fair value of employee stock options over the applicable vesting period.  We do not expect SFAS 123(R) to significantly change our accounting for restricted stock awards or non-employee stock awards.

 

SFAS 123(R) is effective as of the beginning of the fiscal year reporting period that begins after June 15, 2005, the first quarter of our fiscal 2006.  SFAS 123(R) applies to new awards and to awards modified, repurchased, or cancelled after the required effective date, as well as to the unvested portion of awards outstanding as of the required effective date (“modified prospective application”). Upon adoption, prior periods may be, but are not required to be, restated.

 

In March 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission released SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 107, “Share-Based Payment.”  SAB No. 107 provides the SEC staff’s position regarding the implementation of

 

32



 

SFAS No. 123(R).  SAB No. 107 contains interpretive guidance related to the interaction between SFAS No. 123(R) and certain SEC rules and regulations, as well as provides the staff’s views regarding the valuation of share-based payment transactions.  We are currently evaluating SAB No. 107 and will be incorporating it as part of our adoption of SFAS No. 123(R).

 

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY:

 

We have a credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) with a group of banks.  The Credit Facility includes a $550 million four-year revolving credit facility (the “Revolving Credit Facility”) and a $200 million four-year term loan (the “Term Loan”).  The Revolving Credit Facility and Term Loan mature in June 2008.  The Revolving Credit Facility and the Term Loan bear interest at a variable rate (4.44% at March 31, 2005) based upon LIBOR or the alternate base rate of interest announced by our lead bank.  The Credit Facility contains various operating and financial covenants.

 

Available borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility are limited to certain percentages of homes under contract, unsold homes, substantially improved lots and accounts receivable.  At March 31, 2005, we had no borrowings outstanding, and had available borrowings of $466.6 million under the Revolving Credit Facility.

 

In June 2004, we issued $180 million aggregate principal amount of 4 5/8% Convertible Senior Notes due 2024 (the “Convertible Senior Notes”) in a private placement pursuant to Rule 144A promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.  In August 2004, we filed a registration statement on Form S-3 with the SEC covering resales of the Convertible Senior Notes and the common stock issuable upon conversion.  The Convertible Senior Notes were issued at a price of 100% of their face amount (before underwriting discount and other issuance costs).  Interest on the Convertible Senior Notes is payable semiannually.  The notes are convertible by holders into shares of our common stock at an initial conversion rate of 19.44 shares of Beazer Homes common stock per $1,000 principal amount (subject to adjustment for customary reasons), representing an initial conversion price of $51.44 per share of common stock (adjusted for the March 2005 three-for-one stock split).  The notes are convertible if the price of our common stock is equal to or greater than 120% of the conversion price for 20 of the last 30 consecutive trading days of a calendar quarter and under certain other circumstances as more fully described in Note 8 to our consolidated financial statements appearing in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004.

 

We may, at our option, redeem for cash the Convertible Senior Notes in whole or in part at any time on or after June 15, 2009, initially at 101.321% of the principal amount, declining to 100% of the principal amount after June 15, 2011.  Holders have the right to require us to purchase all or any portion of the Convertible Senior Notes for cash on June 15, 2011, June 15, 2014 and June 15, 2019 or if we undergo a fundamental change, as defined.  In each case, we will pay a purchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes to be purchased plus any accrued and unpaid interest to such purchase date.

 

In November 2003, we issued $200 million 6 ½% Senior Notes due November 2013 (the “Original Notes”) in a private placement pursuant to Rule 144A and Regulation S promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.  The Original Notes were issued at a price of 100% of their face amount (before underwriting discount and other issuance costs).  In May 2004 we completed an offer to exchange all of the outstanding Original Notes for an equal amount of 6 ½% Senior Notes due November 2013 (the “6 ½% Senior Notes”), which were registered under the Securities Act of 1933.  Interest on the 6 ½% Senior Notes is payable semiannually.  We may, at our option, redeem the 6 ½% Senior Notes in whole or in part at any time after

 

33



 

November 2008, initially at 103.250% of the principal amount, declining to 100% of the principal amount after November 2011.  We may redeem the 6 ½% Senior Notes, in whole or in part, at any time before November 2008 at a redemption price equal to the principal amount  thereof plus a “make-whole” premium, plus accrued and unpaid interest.  A portion of such notes may also be redeemed prior to November 2006 under certain conditions.

 

In April 2002, we issued $350 million 8 3/8% Senior Notes due April 2012 (the “Original Notes”) in a private placement pursuant to Rule 144A and Regulation S promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.  In September 2002 we completed an offer to exchange all of the outstanding Original Notes for an equal amount of 8 3/8% Senior Notes due 2012 (the “8 3/8% Senior Notes”), which were registered under the Securities Act of 1933.  The terms of the 8 3/8% Senior Notes were substantially identical to the terms of the Original Notes.  The Original Notes were issued at a price of 100% of their face amount (before underwriting discount and other issuance costs).  Interest on the 8 3/8% Senior Notes is payable semiannually.  We may, at our option, redeem the 8 3/8% Senior Notes in whole or in part at any time after April 2007, initially at 104.188% of the principal amount, declining to 100% of the principal amount after April 2010.

 

In May 2001, we issued $200 million 8 5/8% Senior Notes due May 2011 (the “8 5/8% Senior Notes”) at a price of 99.178% of their face amount (before underwriting discount and other issuance costs).  Interest on the 8 5/8% Senior Notes is payable semiannually.  We may, at our option, redeem the 8 5/8% Senior Notes in whole or in part at any time after May 2006, initially at 104.3125% of the principal amount, declining to 100% of the principal amount after May 2009.

 

The Convertible Senior Notes, the 6 ½ % Senior Notes, the 8 3/8% Senior Notes and the 8 5/8% Senior Notes (collectively, the “Senior Notes”) are unsecured obligations ranking pari passu with all other existing and future senior indebtedness.  All of our significant subsidiaries are full and unconditional guarantors of the Senior Notes and our obligations under the Credit Facility, and are jointly and severally liable for obligations under the Senior Notes and the Credit Facility.  Each guarantor subsidiary is a 100% owned subsidiary of Beazer Homes.

 

The indentures under which the Senior Notes were issued contain certain restrictive covenants, including limitations on payment of dividends.  At March 31, 2005, under the most restrictive covenants of each indenture, approximately $247.1 million of our retained earnings was available for cash dividends and for share repurchases.  Each indenture provides that, in the event of defined changes in control or if our consolidated tangible net worth falls below a specified level or in certain circumstances upon a sale of assets, we are required to offer to repurchase certain specified amounts of outstanding Senior Notes.

 

Our long term debt and other contractual obligations (principally operating leases) are further described in Notes 7, 8 and 10 to our consolidated financial statements which appear in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2004.

 

In January 2000, we filed a $300 million universal shelf registration statement on Form S-3 with the Securities and Exchange Commission.  Pursuant to the filing, we may, from time to time over an extended period, offer new debt and/or equity securities.  Our $200 million 8 5/8% Senior Notes were sold pursuant to this registration statement.  The timing and amount of future offerings, if any, will depend on market and general business conditions.

 

34



 

We believe that our cash and cash equivalents on hand and current borrowing capacity, together with anticipated cash flows from operations, is sufficient to meet liquidity needs for the foreseeable future.  There can be no assurance, however, that amounts available in the future from our sources of liquidity will be sufficient to meet future capital needs.  The amount and types of indebtedness that we may incur may be limited by the terms of the indentures governing our Senior Notes and our Term Loan and Revolving Credit Facility.  We continually evaluate expansion opportunities through acquisition of established regional homebuilders and such opportunities may require us to seek additional capital in the form of equity or debt financing from a variety of potential sources, including additional bank financing and/or securities offerings.

 

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS:

 

We acquire certain lots by means of option contracts.   Option contracts generally require the payment of cash for the right to acquire lots during a specified period of time at a certain price.  Under option contracts, both with and without specific performance provisions, purchase of the properties is contingent upon satisfaction of certain requirements by us and the sellers.  Our obligation with respect to options with specific performance provisions is included on our consolidated balance sheets in other liabilities.  Under option contracts without specific performance obligations, our liability is generally limited to forfeiture of the non-refundable deposits, letters of credit and other non-refundable amounts incurred, which aggregated approximately $207.1 million at March 31, 2005.  This amount includes letters of credit of approximately $28.6 million. Below is a summary of amounts, net of cash deposits, committed under all options at March 31, 2005 (in thousands):

 

 

 

Aggregate Exercise
Price of Options

 

Options with specific performance

 

$

19,740

 

Options without specific performance

 

$

2,045,549

 

Total options

 

$

2,065,289

 

 

Certain of our option contracts are with sellers who are deemed to be Variable Interest Entities (“VIEs”) under FASB Revised Interpretation No. 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an Interpretation of ARB No. 51” (“FIN 46R”).  FIN 46R defines a VIE as an entity with insufficient equity investment to finance its planned activities without additional financial support or an entity in which the equity investors lack certain characteristics of a controlling financial interest.  Pursuant to FIN 46R, an enterprise that absorbs a majority of the expected losses or receives a majority of the expected residual returns of a VIE is deemed to be the primary beneficiary of the VIE and must consolidate the VIE.

 

We have determined that we are the primary beneficiary of certain of these option contracts.  Our risk is generally limited to the option deposits that we pay, and creditors of the sellers generally have no recourse to the general credit of the Company.  Although we do not have legal title to the optioned land, for those option contracts for which we are the primary beneficiary, we are required to consolidate the land under option at fair value.  We believe that the exercise prices of our option contracts approximate their fair value.  Our consolidated balance sheets at March 31, 2005 and September 30, 2004 reflect consolidated inventory not owned of $182.8 million and $254.8 million, respectively.  Obligations related to consolidated inventory not owned totaled $147.9 million at March 31, 2005 and $219.0 million at September 30, 2004.  The difference

 

35



 

between the balances of consolidated inventory not owned and obligations related to consolidated inventory not owned represents cash deposits paid under the option agreements.   The above disclosures of amounts committed under options include our obligations related to consolidated inventory not owned.

 

We participate in a number of land development joint ventures in which we have less than a controlling interest.  We enter into joint ventures in order to acquire attractive land positions, to manage our risk profile and to leverage our capital base. Our joint ventures are typically entered into with developers and other homebuilders to develop finished lots for sale to the joint venture’s members and other third parties.  We account for our interest in these joint ventures under the equity method.  Our consolidated balance sheets include investments in joint ventures totaling $76.6 million and $44.7 million at March 31, 2005 and September 30, 2004, respectively.

 

Our joint ventures typically obtain secured acquisition and development financing.  In some instances, we and our joint venture partners have provided varying levels of guarantees of debt of our unconsolidated joint ventures.  At March 31, 2005 and September 30, 2004, we had repayment guarantees of $23.2 and $10.0 million, respectively, and loan-to-value maintenance guarantees of $64.8 million and $56.8 million, respectively, of debt of unconsolidated joint ventures.  Repayment guarantees require us to repay our share of debt of unconsolidated joint ventures in the event the joint venture defaults on its obligations under the borrowings.  Loan-to-value maintenance guarantees require us to repay our share of the venture’s borrowings to the extent such borrowings exceed a specified percentage of the value of the property securing the loan.

 

There have been no material changes to our aggregate contractual commitments as disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2004.

 

OUTLOOK:

 

Record backlog coupled with expectations of continued strength in the housing market and our continued execution on our strategic initiatives give us confidence in our future growth opportunities.  As such, we are raising our outlook for earnings per share from a range of $6.67 - $7.00 to a range of $7.00 - $7.25 in fiscal 2005 before the goodwill impairment charge recorded this quarter but taking into account the charges associated with the class action settlement for Trinity Homes.  Although closing delays in the Southeast and West regions have shifted a significant portion of the year’s expected results to the second half of the fiscal year, performance to date, coupled with extremely strong backlog, gives the Company a high degree of confidence in its near term performance.  While the Midwest and Charlotte, NC markets are weaker than originally anticipated, strength in the Company’s other major markets is currently expected to more than offset any shortfall in operating contribution from the Midwest and Charlotte.

 

Cautionary Statement Pursuant to Safe Harbor Provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995:

 

This quarterly report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.  These forward-looking statements represent our expectations or beliefs concerning future events, and it is possible that the results described in this quarterly report will not be achieved.  These forward-looking statements can generally be identified by the use of statements that include words such as “estimate,” “project,” “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “foresee,” “likely,” “will,” “goal,” “target” or other similar words or phrases.  All forward-looking statements are based upon

 

36



 

information available to us on the date of this quarterly report.  Except as may be required under applicable law, we do not undertake any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.

 

These forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside of our control, that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements, including, among other things, the matters discussed in this annual report in the sections captioned “Outlook” and “Financial Condition and Liquidity.”  Additional information about factors that could lead to material changes in performance is contained in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.  Such factors may include:

 

                  economic changes nationally or in our local markets;

                  volatility of mortgage interest rates and inflation;

                  increased competition;

                  shortages of skilled labor or raw materials used in the production of houses;

                  increased prices for labor, land and raw materials used in the production of houses;

                  increased land development costs on projects under development;

                  the cost and availability of  insurance, including the availability of insurance for the presence of mold;

                  the impact of construction defect and home warranty claims;

                  a material failure on the part of Trinity Homes LLC to satisfy the conditions of the class action settlement agreement;

                  any delays in reacting to changing consumer preference in home design;

                  terrorist acts and other acts of war;

                  changes in consumer confidence;

                  delays or difficulties in implementing initiatives to reduce our production and overhead cost structure;

                  delays in land development or home construction resulting from adverse weather conditions;

                  potential delays or increased costs in obtaining necessary permits as a result of changes to, or complying with, laws, regulations, or governmental policies;

                  changes in accounting policies, standards, guidelines or principles, as may be adopted by regulatory agencies as well as the Financial Accounting Standards Board;

                  the failure of our improvement plan for the Midwest and strategies to broaden target price points and lessen dependence on the entry-level segment in certain markets to achieve desired results; or

                  other factors over which we have little or no control.

 

Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which such statement is made, and, except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which such statement is made or to reflect the occurrence if unanticipated events.  New factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible for management to predict all such factors.

 

37



 

Item 3.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

 

We are exposed to a number of market risks in the ordinary course of business.  Our primary market risk exposure for financial instruments relates to fluctuations in interest rates.  We do not believe our exposure in this area is material to cash flows or earnings.  From time to time, we have entered into interest rate swap agreements to manage interest costs and hedge against risks associated with fluctuating interest rates with respect to floating rate debt.  We do not enter into or hold derivatives for trading or speculative purposes.  As of March 31, 2005, we have a total of $200 million of floating rate debt outstanding, and we are not a party to any interest rate swap agreements.

 

Item 4.  Controls and Procedures

 

As of March 31, 2005, the end of the period covered by this report on Form 10-Q, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of Beazer Homes’ management, including the CEO and CFO, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)).  Based on that evaluation, Beazer Homes’ management, including the CEO and CFO, concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that required information will be disclosed on a timely basis in our reports filed under the Exchange Act.  Further, our CEO and CFO concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures have been designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed by us under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the CEO and CFO, in a manner to allow timely decisions regarding the required disclosure.  No changes in Beazer Homes’ internal control over financial reporting were identified during the evaluation described above that occurred during the Company’s second fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

PART II.  OTHER INFORMATION

 

Item 1.  Legal Proceedings

 

As of March 31, 2005, our subsidiary, Trinity Homes LLC, had received 1,733 construction defect and warranty complaints related to moisture intrusion and mold.  As of March 31, 2005, there were 13 pending lawsuits related to these complaints.  One of these suits, Christopher J. Colon and Mary A. Colon v. Trinity Homes LLC and Beazer Homes Investment Corp. (formerly filed as Gary Harmon and Sheri Harmon v. Trinity Homes LLC and Beazer Homes Investment Corp.) is a class action suit that was filed in Hamilton County Superior Court in the State of Indiana on August 19, 2003 against Trinity and Beazer Homes Investment Corp., another one of our subsidiaries and Trinity’s parent.  As part of that case, the plaintiffs asserted that Trinity and Beazer Homes Investment Corp. violated applicable building codes.    The parties in the class action engaged in a series of mediation conferences which resulted in a settlement among the parties. The Court approved the settlement agreement on October 20, 2004.

 

The settlement class is defined as the current owners of all Trinity homes that have brick veneer, where the closing of Trinity’s initial sale of the home took place between June 1, 1998 and October 31, 2002.  However, the class definition specifically excludes (a) any houses built by Homes by John McKenzie; (b)

 

38



 

any houses owned by Trinity as of August 6, 2004, or which as of August 6, 2004 were the subject of an executed agreement for Trinity to purchase the homes; and (c) any houses for which a homeowner has executed or agreed to a release in favor of Trinity as part of a separate agreement.

 

The settlement agreement establishes an agreed protocol and process for assessment and remediation of any external water intrusion issues at the homes which includes, among other things, that the homes will be repaired at Trinity’s expense. A licensed engineering firm working on behalf of the homeowners will be allowed to review the plan for the remediation of each home as well as the performance of the repair work.  The settlement establishes a time frame within which the work must be completed and provides a Dispute Resolution Panel to resolve disputes between any homeowner and Trinity concerning both the plan to remediate the home and the performance of the work.

 

Under the settlement, each homeowner releases Trinity, Beazer Homes Investment Corp. and other affiliated companies, including Beazer Homes, from the claims asserted in the class action lawsuit, claims arising out of external water intrusion, and claims of improper brick installation, including property damage claims, loss or diminution of property value claims, and most personal injury claims, among others.

 

There was a 30 day timeframe, which ended on November 19, 2004, to appeal the Court’s order approving the settlement.  No appeals were received by the Court within the timeframe established.  The Company sent out claims notices on December 17, 2004, and the class members had until February 15, 2005 to file claims.  A total of 1,311 valid claims were filed (of the 2,161 total class members), of which 613 complaints had been received prior to the Company’s receipt of the claims notices.  Class members who did not file a claim by February 15, 2005 are no longer able to file a class action claim under the settlement or pursue an individual claim against Trinity.

 

In November 2003, Beazer Homes received a request for information from the United States Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”) pursuant to Section 308 of the Clean Water Act seeking information concerning the nature and extent of storm water discharge practices relating to certain projects undertaken since December 1998.  Beazer Homes identified 381 projects within this category and the EPA sought specific information concerning 71 of them and is conducting site inspections on certain others.  As of March 31, 2005, the EPA or an equivalent state agency has issued Administrative Orders identifying alleged instances of noncompliance for 20 of the sites.  The Administrative Orders provide mandatory compliance schedules to address the alleged deficiencies in storm water management practices, but do not impose any monetary penalties.  The EPA has reserved the right to impose monetary penalties at a later date, the amount of which, if any, cannot currently be estimated.  Beazer Homes has taken action to comply with the requirements of each of the Administrative Orders and is working to otherwise maintain compliance with the requirements of the Clean Water Act.

 

The Company and certain of its subsidiaries have been named as defendants in various claims, complaints and other legal actions, including relating to moisture intrusion and related mold claims, construction defects and product liability.  Certain of the liabilities resulting from these actions are covered by insurance.  With respect to certain general liability exposures, including construction defect, moisture intrusion and related mold claims and product liability, interpretation of underlying current and future trends, assessment of claims and the related liability and reserve estimation process is highly judgmental due to the complex nature of these exposures, with each exposure exhibiting unique circumstances.  In

 

39



 

particular, for construction defect liability there is a high degree of uncertainty relating to whether insurance coverage exists, when losses occur, the size of each loss, expectations for future interpretive rulings concerning contract provisions and the extent to which the assertion of these claims will expand geographically.  In our opinion, based on our current assessment, the ultimate resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

 

Item 4.           Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

 

On February 3, 2005, we held our annual meeting of shareholders, at which the following matters were voted upon with the results indicated below.  All numbers reported are shares of Beazer Homes common stock.

 

1) The shareholders elected seven members to the Board of Directors to serve until the next annual meeting.  The results of voting were as follows (based on 13,838,226 outstanding shares entitled to vote at the meeting):

 

Election of Directors

 

Name

 

For

 

Votes
Withheld

 

Laurent Alpert

 

11,747,329

 

826,596

 

Katie J. Bayne

 

10,984,715

 

1,589,210

 

Brian C. Beazer

 

10,974,388

 

1,599,537

 

Ian J. McCarthy

 

11,748,853

 

825,072

 

Maureen E. O’Connell

 

10,975,507

 

1,598,418

 

Larry T. Solari

 

10,983,209

 

1,590,716

 

Stephen P. Zelnak, Jr.

 

10,975,671

 

1,598,254

 

 

2) The shareholders approved an amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation for the purpose of increasing the number of authorized shares of the Company’s common stock from 30,000,000 to 80,000,000 and reducing the par value of the Company’s common stock from $0.01 per share to $0.001 per share.  The results of the vote were as follows:

 

Votes For

 

Votes Against

 

Votes Abstain

 

11,962,013

 

167,104

 

7,721

 

 

3) The shareholders approved a the adoption of the Executive Value Created Incentive Plan.  The results of the vote were as follows:

 

Votes For

 

Votes Against

 

Votes Abstain

 

7,754,151

 

903,518

 

19,837

 

 

40



 

Item 6.           Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

 

(a)                                  Exhibits:

 

31.1                           Certification pursuant to 17 CFR 240.13a-14 promulgated under Section 302 of the Sarbanes- Oxley of 2002

31.2                           Certification pursuant to 17 CFR 240.13a-14 promulgated under Section 302 of the Sarbanes- Oxley of 2002

32.1                           Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2                           Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

(b)                                 Reports on Form 8-K:

 

On January 27, 2005 we furnished a report on Form 8-K announcing under Item 2.02 our earnings and results of operations for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2004.

 

On February 2, 2005 we filed a report on Form 8-K containing under Item 9.01 the transcript of the conference call held to discuss earnings and results of operations for the quarter ended December 31, 2004 held on January 27, 2005.

 

On February 9, 2005 we filed a report on Form 8-K announcing under Item 1.01 the approval of the Executive Value Created Incentive Plan by our shareholders.

 

On March 18, 2005 we filed a report on Form 8-K announcing under Item 5.02 the appointment of Kenneth J. Gary as Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary.  Mr. Gary’s compensation agreement was filed under Item 1.01.

 

On March 29, 2005 we filed a report on Form 8-K announcing under Item 2.06 the likely impairment of goodwill relating to certain of our divisions.  Additionally, we filed a press release issued on March 29, 2005 as an exhibit under item 7.01.

 

41



 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

 

 

Beazer Homes USA, Inc.

 

 

 

Date:

  April 28, 2005

 

By:

  /s/James O’Leary

 

 

 

Name:

James O’Leary

 

 

 

Executive Vice President and

 

 

 

Chief Financial Officer

 

42