UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

ý	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004

OR

o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to .

Commission File No. 000-30617

GlobalSCAPE, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware		74-2785449
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

6000 Northwest Parkway, Suite 100 San Antonio, Texas		78249
(Address of Principal Executive Office)		(Zip Code)

(210) 308-8267
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share
(Title of Class)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

ý Yes o No

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).

o Yes ý No

The aggregate market value of the registrant’s outstanding common stock held by non-affiliates was approximately $396,321 as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, based upon the closing sales price of $0.11 per share on such date on the NASD’s OTC Bulletin Board. As of March 8, 2005 there were 13,773,219 common shares outstanding, of which 3,602,909 were held by non-affiliates.

Documents Incorporated by Reference

Portions of the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for the 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held in June 2005, are incorporated by reference in Part III hereof.

Preliminary Notes

GlobalSCAPE®, CuteFTP®, CuteSITE Builder®, PureCMS®, CuteZIP®, CuteHTML® and CuteMAP® are registered trademarks of GlobalSCAPE Texas, LP. GlobalSCAPE Secure FTP Server, GlobalSCAPE Transfer Engine, ContentXML and SnapEdit are trademarks of GlobalSCAPE Texas, LP. Other trademarks and tradenames in this Annual Reportt are the property of their respective owners.

In May 2000, our board of directors approved a 7.6 for 1 stock split. All information in this Annual Report has been adjusted to reflect the effects of this stock split.

Forward-Looking Statements

This Annual Report on Form 10-K and the documents incorporated by reference herein contain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. “Forward-looking statements” are those statements that are not of historical fact, but describe management’s beliefs and expectations. We have identified many of the forward-looking statements in this Annual Report by using words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “could,” “estimate,” “may,” “expect,” and “intend.” Although we believe these beliefs and expectations are reasonable, our operations involve a number of risks and uncertainties, including those described in the “Risk Factors” section of this Annual Report and other documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Therefore, GlobalSCAPE’s actual results could differ materially from those discussed in this Annual Report.

PART I

Item 1. Business

Company Overview

GlobalSCAPE develops and distributes Internet related software, including file management, content management and Web development tools. We started in 1996 with the distribution of CuteFTP and have achieved significant success and popularity with this product. We built on this success by steadily adding complementary products and believe we now have a reputation as a provider of easy-to use, affordable software. Since 2000 we have focused on enhancing our portfolio of products to meet the increasing demand for data security, and for solutions that permit non-technical personnel to contribute content to their organizations’ Web sites. Our software is used worldwide across a wide range of industries. We have sold approximately 1,200,000 software licenses to date and our customer base includes individual consumers, small to medium-sized businesses, as well as some of the largest corporations in the world.

We distribute our software primarily via download from our Web site, www.globalscape.com. Prospective buyers may use our software products for free for a thirty-day evaluation period. The programs are automatically disabled if a license is not purchased by the end of the trial period. Our current products range in price from $19.95 to $25,000 per license. Historically, the majority of software purchases have been made online using a credit card. During 2003 and 2004 we increased our emphasis on developing our internal sales staff and reseller channels to capture those sales that require personal attention, such as sales of our more complex products and sales to larger enterprises. Our software is also available for download from a variety of independent Internet software sites such as CNet’s Download.com, as well as sites in Western Europe, Canada, Australia, and Asia. We distribute a limited number of copies on CD in Fry’s and Micro Center stores in the United States and through numerous international resellers. We provide free customer support via a searchable knowledge base on our Web site and sell “live” support and maintenance packages.

During 2004 approximately 64% of our revenues were generated from customers within the United States, with the remaining 36% concentrated mostly in Western Europe, Canada and Australia. Virtually all of our 2004 revenues were derived from sales of software licenses and support agreements. The combined sales of CuteFTP and CuteFTP Pro accounted for 75% and 69% of our revenues in 2003 and 2004, respectively.

Products

Our current products include Windows®-based, browser-based and server software applications.

CuteFTP. CuteFTP is a file transfer protocol, or “FTP”, client. Although the term “FTP” is not a household word, the protocol is well known and heavily used in the information technology world. Like the more widely known “HTTP” that underlies the World Wide Web, FTP is simply a protocol that allows computers to exchange information over the Internet or other networks. CuteFTP is a “client-side” program, meaning that it permits a user to request a file from or send a file to an FTP server or host computer. The user base for this program ranges from corporate MIS professionals who use it to transfer data between locations via the Internet, to individual Web site operators who use it to upload their Web pages to their Web hosting provider. CuteFTP simplifies use of file transfer protocol by hiding the technical processes behind a user-friendly, graphical interface, which allows users to “drag `n drop” files between computers. It includes an automatic reconnection feature that resumes broken transfers, a transfer queue and a built in HTML editor that allows remote editing of Web pages. CuteFTP has won several awards, including the CNet Editors’ Choice award, and has been favorably reviewed in leading online and print trade journals such as PC Magazine, WindowsNT, Yahoo Internet Life, CNet’s Download.com and Tucows, as being the most powerful, easy-to-use file transfer protocol program available. We offer CuteFTP in German, French, Spanish, Japanese and Traditional and Simplified Chinese. CuteFTP was first released in February 1995 by its original author, and was first distributed as a commercial product by GlobalSCAPE in April 1996. In October 2003 GlobalSCAPE released CuteFTP Mac, our easy-to use ftp client for the Macintosh operating system. CuteFTP Mac incorporates many of the popular features of CuteFTP for Windows, while adhering to Apple’s Aqua® interface and usability guidelines.

CuteFTP Pro. CuteFTP Pro is a secure FTP client designed for advanced users and information technology professionals. CuteFTP Pro incorporates standards for encrypted transfers using Secure Socket Layer (SSL), HTTP, and SSH2, as well as advanced S/KEY password encryption. It includes various features attractive to advanced users such as multi-part and concurrent file transfers to maximize transfer speed, scheduled file transfers, automated site backups and scripting ability for automating FTP tasks. CuteFTP Pro has been favorably reviewed by leading online publications including CNet’s Download.com, ZDNet and PC Review. CuteFTP Pro was released in March 2001.

Secure FTP Server. Secure FTP Server complements CuteFTP Pro and other professional FTP clients by enabling encrypted transfers using Secure Socket Layer (SSL), Secure Shell (SSH2) and advanced S/KEY password encryption. When used with CuteFTP Pro, Secure FTP Server offers a complete digital certificate management system, giving system administrators the ability to create, sign, import, export and add digital certificates, as well as kick off back-end processes. The latter functionality can be used as a partial or total replacement for more complex enterprise-level electronic data interchange systems (EDI). Additional features include full remote management capability, the ability to operate multiple FTP sites with unique directory structures from a single server and manage user accounts with advanced restriction settings for maximum security and control. Secure FTP Server has been favorably reviewed by leading online publications including Server Watch and File Forum. GlobalSCAPE Secure FTP Server was first released in January 2002.

Enhanced File Transfer Server. Enhanced File Transfer Server is a hardened file server for enterprise-level solutions. Building on Secure FTP Server with digital certificate management, Secure Socket Layer (SSL) and S/KEY password encryption, remote administration, multiple site hosting and management, and extensive automation with a full featured event rule library and Component Object Model (COM) extensions, Enhanced File Transfer Server adds repository encryption, additional protocol

support, SSH security, data offload capabilities, and automated notification. Enhanced File Transfer Server was first released by GlobalSCAPE in November 2004.

CuteSite Builder. CuteSITE Builder is a WYSIWYG (what you see is what you get) Web site creation tool enabling anyone, regardless of skill level, to easily create, publish and manage a high quality Web site without having to learn HTML, FTP or graphic design. Users choose the design and type of Web site they would like to create from professionally designed templates, add personalized content such as family photos, images and links and publish their Web site with just one click. This program is based on technology licensed from Trellix Corporation and previously distributed as Trellix Web. CuteSITE Builder was first released by GlobalSCAPE in June 2001.

SnapEdit. SnapEdit is the easiest, most affordable way to enable non-technical users to create and publish information to a Web site, in real-time. This simplified Web content management (WCM) system works with any shared or dedicated hosting environment and can be installed quickly by Web site administrators. End users simply browse to the Web site and create or edit any type of information imaginable including tables, images and media files through SnapEdit’s What-You-See-Is-What-You-Get (WYSIWYG) editor and file manager. Plus, with SnapEdit’s automatic backups and protective editing features, you won’t worry about losing content or unauthorized content being changed. SnapEdit was first released by GlobalSCAPE in July 2004.

PureCMS. PureCMS is our Web content management solution. “Content management” generally refers to software that streamlines the process for managing information on a Web site or intranet. PureCMS is designed to solve basic problems endemic to maintaining current information on a Web site such as bottlenecks in the IT department, lack of control and accountability, and miscommunication between content authors and Web developers. Using PureCMS, a company’s Web administrator may give non-technical personnel the ability to directly revise designated content. For example, the marketing department could modify pricing, product descriptions and graphics while the human resources department updated its job postings, all without the involvement of technical personnel. Access by non-technical personnel is limited, however, so that the Web site administrator’s ability to protect the overall infrastructure and design of the site is not compromised. The program is browser-based with a Windows-like interface, so users can easily access and work on Web sites, eliminating the need for special training. Changes are made to a copy of an organization’s Web site in a staging area and published to the live site only after group leaders or Web site administrators approve the content for publishing. Additional features include WYSIWYG (what you see is what you get) editing, visual comparison of proposed changes to the live site, e-mail notification of changes and activity, site statistics, versioning and archiving. PureCMS works with any Web site development tool including popular applications such as Front Page and Dreamweaver, and can be implemented without deconstructing (re-building) the existing Web site. The program is scaled to meet the needs of small to medium-sized businesses, but can be used by large organizations for intranet or independent Web site management. PureCMS was released in January 2003.

In January 2004 we also made the software available as an application service model. We host the software for use on our servers in exchange for a periodic fee, rather than licensing a copy to the customer for use on the customer’s server.

Web Survey. Web Survey is an easy-to-use program for conducting surveys on Web sites. Users may design and publish questionnaires and gather results in their e-mail in-box, without the need for custom programming. The program includes tools for the analysis and presentation of results. Web Survey was released in May 2003.

CuteZIP. CuteZIP is a file compression program that enables users to shrink and encrypt files for secure transfer and storage using “strong” or 128-bit encryption. Users may compress files across multiple disks or within a directory for easy download or storage. Users may also create encrypted self-extracting files that may be opened by a recipient without the use of a zip utility. CuteZIP has won the CNet Editors’ Choice award and has been favorably reviewed by leading online publications such as CNet’s Download.com, MP3.com and Tucows. CuteZIP was first released in September 1999.

CuteHTML. CuteHTML is a text-based HTML (hypertext markup language) editor used to create Web pages. CuteHTML is a direct editing tool, meaning that the user creates and edits HTML code directly, as opposed to a visual editing or WYSIWIG tool like CuteSITE Builder, which does not require the user to understand HTML coding. It includes various productivity enhancing features such as color coded tags for easy code identification, tag tips for quick access to standard HTML tags, multiple document find and replace, spell check, code for individual browsers, tabbed interface and the ability to edit files on remote servers when used in conjunction with CuteFTP. CuteHTML has been favorably reviewed in leading online and print publications including CNet’s Download.com, ZDNET and Tucows. CuteHTML was first released in January 1999.

CuteHTML Pro. CuteHTML Pro is our professional Web editing tool, offering Web masters even more control over Web projects, code and site quality. Code created with CuteHTML Pro meets strict HTML specifications, such as those defined by the Word Wide Web Consortium, and does not add extraneous or non-standards compliant code. CuteHTML Pro includes features attractive to advanced users of HTML editors, such a comprehensive Script Generator, hundreds of ready-to-use Java and DHTML scripts, extended string/paragraph Search & Replace, inline Perl and PHP parser, built in FTP module, Document Evaluation, and a robust multi-language Reference Editor. In addition, Web masters can quickly generate complex code such as tables, frames, image maps, forms and text formatting with wizard-like dialogs, recall commonly used code snippets using a single keystroke sequence, and create pages using one of the many pre-built page templates. The software also includes project control features such as built in File, Project, To-Do List and Bookmark Management tools, and permits users to easily check spelling, optimize code, validate links and check CSS, HTML, and JavaScript Syntax for error free sites. In addition, the software permits users to preview HTML pages without launching an external browser and highlights syntax for Perl, XML, WML, ASP, PHP, ColdFusion, CSS, and JavaScript languages.

CuteMAP. CuteMAP is an image-mapping tool designed to help HTML users create clickable images on their Web site graphics for improved navigation. Users select the area of an image that they want “hot,” and tell CuteMAP where the image should point. CuteMAP automatically creates the image map code, which can be copied to an existing HTML document. CuteMAP has been favorably reviewed in leading online and print publications including CNet’s Download.com, ZDNET, Tucows and LockerGnome. CuteMAP was first released in September 1999.

In December 2003, we released Protect IIS, an application firewall for use in securing Microsoft IIS Web Servers from Internet based attacks. We received only lukewarm response to this program, and decided in February 2004 to discontinue distribution. The program was licensed to us on a trial basis by Turillion Software Technologies, Inc., so we experienced minimal costs in developing and launching the program.

We also discontinued our Web Hosting product in 2003 after experiencing disappointing sales results. The service was provided on a trial basis by FortuneCity.com, Inc., so we experienced minimal costs in developing and launching this service as well.

History and Recent Developments

GlobalSCAPE was organized as a Delaware corporation in April 1996 when we obtained the right to distribute CuteFTP from its original author. Our former parent, ATSI Communications, Inc. (ATSI), established GlobalSCAPE as a wholly owned subsidiary dedicated to the development, marketing and support of Internet software products and the execution of other strategies unrelated to ATSI’s core telecommunications business. In 1998, we purchased all rights to CuteFTP from its author and in 1999 began developing and selling complementary products under the “Cute” brand such as CuteHTML and CuteMAP. In September 2000, ATSI distributed approximately 27% of its GlobalSCAPE common stock to its shareholders. As a result of this partial spin off, we became a reporting company under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. In June 2002, ATSI sold its remaining interest in the company to a San Antonio-based joint venture.

Significant recent developments are as follows:

• January 2004: We announced the availability of PureCMS as a hosted content management service.

• January 2004: The federal General Services Administration approved GlobalSCAPE as a government supplier via the award of a five-year contract under the multiple award schedule program. This approval enables government agencies to purchase GlobalSCAPE’s software without completing the cumbersome procurement procedures required for non-scheduled suppliers.

• February 2004: Sandra Poole-Christal stepped down as President and Chief Operating Officer and was succeeded as President by Charles R. Poole. Ms. Poole-Christal will continue to serve as the Company’s Vice President of Marketing. Ms. Poole-Christal also resigned her seat on the Board of Directors, and Mr. Poole was elected to complete her term by the remaining Board members. Along with the change in management, the Company laid off 9 employees, approximately 20% of its workforce, as part of an expense control measure.

• March 2004: We released our Secure FTP Server 2.0 an enterprise-class FTP server for the secure transfer and management of critical business data.

• March 2004: We released new CuteFTP 6.0 Home and Professional versions.

• April 2004: We announced the availability of PublishXML, which offers businesses a way to manage Web content with sophisticated, enterprise class features.

• April 2004: We announced new channel partner program including lead generation, sales and marketing support, technical training, partner discounts and access to online resources.

• June 2004: Daniel McRedmond resigned his position as Vice President of Finance and Operations and was replaced by Thomas F. Farar as Chief Financial Officer.

• July 2004: We released PureCMS 3.0, our mid-market browser based content management software.

• July 2004: We announced the availability of SnapEdit, an entry level content management software tool, adding to our existing line of content management products.

• August 2004: We announced the availability of CuteFTP Server, allowing individuals to host their own FTP server from home.

• November 2004: We announced availability of our Enhanced File Transfer (EFT) solution providing increased security, reliability and automation for improved enterprise information management.

• February 2005: We announced availability of our EFT product at the HIMMS trade show for healthcare organizations.

Industry Background

The Internet has become an integral part of operations for companies of all sizes, not only for e-commerce, but also as a means of managing information between central and remote locations and with employees, partners and suppliers. We believe that the Internet will continue to grow and that this growth will continue to create demand for our products. As corporate Web operations mature, we believe we will

see an increasing demand for solutions to facilitate secure file transfers on the internet and for solutions that streamline the management of Web content.

Strategy

Our goal is to build upon our successful market position in FTP (file transfer protocol) for the past 9 years in order to provide large users with very secure solutions to their growing file transfer needs. We continue to enhance high quality, affordable software that enables organizations and individuals to easily create, move and manage Web and file-based data in a secure, collaborative environment. We have successfully established a brand in the market for Internet software productivity tools with our file management products, CuteFTP and CuteFTP Pro. We believe the next phase of our growth will come through the provision of our products involving secure file transfer to meet the growing demand for file security when transferring information across the internet due to changes in regulations in various industries and content management solutions that help non-technical professionals manage their organization’s Web sites without reliance on information technology professionals.

Key elements of our strategy are:

Continue to enhance and develop security features of our products. Corporate and individual users are increasingly concerned with security. We have added the Enhanced File Transfer (EFT) enterprise solution to our product line as a solution for businesses to meet the needs of security issues when transferring files in and out of their servers across the internet. We will continue to develop and add features throughout 2005 to meet the demand for file transfer security in EFT and our other well known FTP products, CuteFTP Home and CuteFTP Professional. We intend to make the FTP and EFT lines of business our main focus in 2005.

Continue sales of PureCMS. We have invested considerable funds and effort in both the development and marketing of PureCMS, our content management product introduced in January 2003. Although we have been disappointed with our sales of this program to date, we continue to believe that the demand for Web content management solutions is strong. We have released new versions of this product and continue to evaluate all aspects of our management of this product, including pricing, ease of installation and use, program functionality, and marketing and sales strategies. We intend to continue to pursue sales and distribution of this product. The product launch and the related selling and development activities for PureCMS consumed a significant portion of our financial resources in 2003. In 2004 we continued to develop and market this product with significantly less expenditures.

Develop a more robust reseller channel. During 2004 we continued our emphasis on the development of our third party reseller channels, and we are continually working on this effort. In particular, we wish to reach “value-added” resellers such as Web design consultants. We believe sales will be significantly enhanced if we are able to recruit numerous resellers who have existing relationships with prospective customers.

Develop our internal sales staff. During 2004 we continued the development of our internal direct sales force to better sell our more complex products, such as Enhanced File Transfer, PureCMS, Secure FTP Server and PublishXML. We intend to continue to develop our sales staff through further training and certification.

Continue to develop online marketing capabilities. We believe we have significant expertise in driving online sales via online marketing activities, including product placement on third party sites such as search engines and referral sites, and electronic mail campaigns. This type of sales activity is particularly well suited to certain of our lower priced products because of the lower cost of sale. We intend to continue to leverage our established Web presence to drive online sales as well as supporting our direct and reseller sales efforts.

Pursue strategic product opportunities. In 2004 we added PublishXML, SnapEdit and Enhanced File Transfer to our product portfolio. We will continue to look for opportunities to acquire or add synergistic products or technologies that enhance the online management of Web and file based data to our portfolio.

Seasonality

We believe our sales are subject to seasonal variations and we experience significantly less sales volume during national holidays and weekends when compared to normal business days. In 2000, we experienced a decline in software sales from the third to fourth quarter, primarily due to lower December sales. Third and fourth quarter revenues in 2001 were comparable, however, we believe this was the result of unusually weak demand in September which skewed the comparison. In 2002, fourth quarter revenues were slightly higher than the third quarter due to a fourth quarter upgrade release of CuteFTP Pro that bolstered revenues for the period. In 2003, fourth quarter sales were 19% lower than third quarter sales primarily due to weakness in November and December, although it is not clear that the decline was due solely to seasonal factors as turnover in our sales force may also have contributed to the decline in revenues. In the fourth quarter of 2004, our sales revenues increased approximately 11% over the same period in 2003, as a result of new product releases and our sales force development. Sales did decline from November 2004 to December 2004. We expect that in future periods we will see weakness in the fourth quarter when compared to the third quarter due to the holiday season.

Network and Equipment

We have contracted with various network providers for Internet access. Our arrangements provide for redundancy in the event of a failure, and also for rapid expansion of available bandwidth in the event that there is a dramatic increase in demand. To protect critical customer data, GlobalSCAPE’s secure server utilizes Secure Sockets Layer encryption. We have dedicated servers on and off site and expansion plans in place to allow rapid and cost effective scalability.

Research and Development

Our internal software engineers are responsible for software design, managing the development process, testing and quality assurance. We utilize offshore developers for a large portion of the coding phase of software development. All phases of development, including scope approval, functional and implementation design, object modeling and programming, are subject to internal quality assurance testing. Our use of external developers allows us to tap into a highly skilled labor pool, maintain a 24-hour development schedule, decrease time to market, and minimize programming costs.

For the years 2002, 2003 and 2004 GlobalSCAPE spent approximately $848,000, $945,000 and $728,000 respectively, on research and development. No research and development costs were capitalized in 2002, 2003 or 2004 and all previously capitalized development costs were fully amortized at December 31, 2002.

Competition

The file management, content management and Web development software market sectors are intensely competitive, subject to rapid change and are significantly affected by new product introductions and other activities of market participants. Our primary competitors vary by product and are listed below.

CuteFTP. CuteFTP exists in a highly competitive environment with several hundred FTP software utilities available on the Internet. We believe our primary competitors are WS_FTP from Ipswitch, Inc. and FTP Voyager by Rhino Software, Inc. CuteFTP was the second Windows-based FTP client to market and is consistently the most frequently downloaded FTP client on popular download sites. CuteFTP Mac, our FTP client for the Macintosh platform competes with Fetch, by Fetch Softworks, Interachry, by Stairways Software Pty Ltd., and Transmit FTP, by Panic Inc.

CuteFTP Pro. CuteFTP Professional competes in the higher end of the same market as CuteFTP, targeting the security minded IT professional. CuteFTP Professional is positioned as one of the only secure

FTP clients that support a wide range of security standards related to the FTP protocol. Competitors in the general FTP market offer products that support a smaller subset of these security standards and address a narrower segment of the secure FTP market. Competitors include Van Dyke, Inc., Ipswitch, Inc., and Rhino Software, Inc.

Secure FTP Server. Secure FTP Server competes against a limited number of secure Windows-based FTP servers. We believe our primary competitors are WS_FTP Server and Serve-U. Secure FTP Server has the advantage of leveraging the success of CuteFTP Pro through product integration, offering proprietary extensions to the FTP protocol, and cross-marketing efforts to an existing customer base.

Enhanced File Transfer Server. Enhanced File Transfer Server competes in the managed file transfer server market. We believe our primary competitors are Tumbleweed, Sterling, Proginet, and SSH’s Tectia. Enhanced File Transfer Server has the advantage of being very cost effective in its market while leveraging and extending the security and file management features of our other FTP products.

CuteSITE Builder. CuteSITE Builder competes against approximately one hundred WYSIWYG editors, including MS FrontPage, Macromedia’s Dreamweaver, HotMetal and HotDog. CuteSITE Builder offers most of the features available in FrontPage, however, the product was developed to further simplify the Web site creation process and is arguably easier to use, better serving the novice. In addition, the product is priced well below FrontPage.

PureCMS. The “content management” market is diverse and encompasses the areas of knowledge management, document management, digital asset management and Web content management. PureCMS is designed for Web content management. The market for Web content management solutions for Fortune 500 companies and other large organizations is dominated by companies such as Vignette, Interwoven, Documentum, Stellant and Microsoft, each of which offers solutions that can cost hundreds of thousands of dollars. We do not intend to compete in this market but are focused on small to medium-sized businesses with a simpler, affordably priced solution. We believe that we have a competitive advantage in that we are better known than some of our competitors among technology professionals who are already familiar with our file management programs, CuteFTP and CuteFTP Pro.

We offer PureCMS both as a packaged solution and as an online service over the Internet. A “packaged solution” means that we license a copy of the software to the customer for a one-time fee to install and use on their own servers. If a customer elects to use PureCMS as a service, they access the software on GlobalSCAPE’s servers via the Internet and pay a monthly or other periodic fee. Our competitors include providers of online solutions, such as Atomz, Crown Peak, and iUpload, and providers of packaged solutions, including Macromedia’s Contribute, Userland, Infosquare and Ektron. We believe that by offering PureCMS both as a service and a packaged solution we can capture those customers who prefer to have control over the solution rather than an ongoing dependency on a technology provider, as well as those customers who prefer to pay a monthly or other periodic fee rather than a higher one-time license fee.

PureCMS also competes against software that incorporate subsets of Web content management functions in Web authoring programs, such as Microsoft’s FrontPage, and Macromedia’s Dreamweaver and Contribute.

Web Survey. Competitive products include both applications and services including Zoomerang, WebSurveyor, EZSurvey and SurveyMonkey. We believe Web Survey has an advantage of a lower total cost of ownership than the competition.

CuteHTML. CuteHTML exists in a highly competitive environment with approximately one hundred text-based HTML editors. CuteHTML’s competition includes HomeSite from Allaire, Inc. CuteHTML’s advantage is that it doesn’t add extraneous code to Web pages, an attribute preferred by many professional Web masters.

CuteHTML Pro. CuteHTML Pro faces heavy competition from visual or “WYSIWYG” editors such as Front Page, by Microsoft, Dreamweaver, by Macromedia Inc, and competition from other direct editors, such as Homesite, also by Macromedia Inc. CuteHTML Pro’s advantage is its appeal to professional Webmasters who typically shun visual editors in favor of the extra features and added control provided by direct editors such as CuteHTML Pro

CuteMAP. CuteMAP competes against approximately 65 image-mapping utilities, which exist in a niche market. Primary competitors include CoffeeCup Image Mapper, Ulead Smart Saver and MapEdit. CuteMAP has the advantage of being able to leverage the success of CuteHTML through product integration and cross-marketing efforts to an existing customer base.

CuteZIP. CuteZIP exists in the highly competitive file compression utility market, competing against several hundred file compression utilities. Its main competitors include WinZIP, the current market leader, and NetZIP. CuteZIP’s main advantage is that it is one of the only compression utilities offering 128-bit encryption to secure compressed files. In addition, users can create self-extracting encrypted archives that recipients may open even if they don’t have a zip utility installed.

We have limited information regarding our products’ market shares in their respective categories. For more discussion on the risks associated with our competition, you should read the information under “Risk Factors.”

Intellectual Property

Our trademarks, copyrights and technology are central to our business. We protect our intellectual property rights through a combination of licenses, trademarks, service marks, copyrights, trade secret laws and restrictions on disclosure.

We currently have registered trademarks for GlobalSCAPE, CuteFTP, CuteFTP Pro, PureCMS, CuteHTML, CuteZIP, CuteMAP and CuteSITE Builder. We have obtained United States copyright registrations for all but the most recently developed versions of our software applications, and have applied for registration for the most recently developed versions.

For more discussion on the risks associated with our intellectual property, you should read the information under “Risk Factors,” especially “Risks Related to Legal Uncertainty.”

Employees

As of February 22, 2005, we had 39 full-time and part-time employees organized within seven functional areas. The employee distribution according to function is as follows:

Department		Number of Employees
Management and Administration		6
Research and Development		3
Quality Assurance		2
Marketing		8
Information Services		4
Sales		10
Customer Support		6

None of our employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements and we believe our employee relations are good.

Risk Factors

We have described below risks that we are aware of that could have a material adverse effect on your stock ownership and our business.

Risks Related to Operations

GlobalSCAPE depends on two products for a substantial portion of its revenues.

GlobalSCAPE depends on two products, CuteFTP and CuteFTP Pro, for approximately 69% of its revenues. In addition, GlobalSCAPE’s ability to produce revenues related to other products and new products depends substantially on exploiting the traffic to GlobalSCAPE’s Web site generated by the demand for CuteFTP and CuteFTP Pro. If GlobalSCAPE is not able to maintain its competitive position with these products, its revenues could decline dramatically and GlobalSCAPE’s plans to expand its business could be substantially impaired. From 1996 to 2000, sales of licenses for CuteFTP increased significantly year to year. In 2002, revenues recognized from CuteFTP and CuteFTP Pro declined from the prior year by approximately 7%. In 2003, revenues recognized from CuteFTP and CuteFTP Pro declined from 2002 by approximately 21%. In 2004, revenues recognized from CuteFTP and CuteFTP Pro declined from 2003 by approximately 7%. This decline was primarily in sales of CuteFTP, which declined 36%. Sales of CuteFTP Pro increased by approximately 41% year over year. Substantially all software products ultimately reach a point in their lifecycle in which sales can be expected to plateau or decline. While it cannot be determined with certainty, these products may have reached such a point in their lifecycles.

If we do not increase revenues or decrease expenses we will not be able to continue as a going concern.

The Company incurred significant operating losses during the three years ending 2003. In January, February and March of 2004, it continued to incur significant operating losses. In February 2004, GlobalSCAPE laid off 9 of the company’s 45 employees to decrease expenses. The Company has improved its working capital since that time and operated at a profit for the year ended 2004. If we fail to increase our revenues or decrease expenses, we may not be able to continue as a going concern.

GlobalSCAPE’s new product introductions may fail to generate sufficient revenue.

We have invested considerable time and financial resources in the development and marketing of PureCMS, our content management program released in January 2003. To date we have realized limited revenue from this product and will not recoup the expenses of bringing this product to market unless sales increase dramatically. We have also experienced disappointing results with our Web hosting service for PureCMS. If revenues from CuteFTP and CuteFTP Pro continue to decline and our new products fail to generate sufficient revenue to replace the declining revenues, our revenues will decline.

GlobalSCAPE may fail to develop or license the intellectual property needed to launch new products.

Our strategy for future growth depends significantly on the addition of new products. If we fail to timely license and/or develop new programs, or if our new programs are not functionally competitive with other programs in this market, our revenue growth could be substantially impaired.

GlobalSCAPE may not be able to develop its sales force as needed to successfully market its new products.

GlobalSCAPE has relied heavily on Internet sales in the past. However, our newer enterprise programs, PureCMS, Secure FTP Server, PublishXML and Enhanced File Transfer (EFT) require a more complex distribution model, including heavy reliance on value-added resellers such as Web development consultants. In addition, we must develop an internal sales force that is skilled at managing a complex and multi-stage sales process appropriate for these products. The PureCMS product may not provide sufficient revenue to offset development and marketing from prior years costs if we are not able to successfully implement these changes. We have experienced significant turnover among our internal sales personnel during 2004, possibly as a result of the changing demands we are placing on our sales staff. This turnover has had an immediate and direct effect on our revenues. Continued turnover, especially of key personnel, could cause revenues to decline dramatically.

If GlobalSCAPE loses key personnel it may not be able to execute its business plan.

GlobalSCAPE’s future success depends on the continued services of key members of its sales team. GlobalSCAPE has experienced significant turnover in its sales department during 2004, possibly due to changing demands placed on sales personnel as the company works toward development of a larger and more skilled sales staff. These individuals are difficult to replace because of the intense competition for similarly skilled people. In addition, new employees in the sales department may not be productive for weeks or months as they learn about GlobalSCAPE’s products.

GlobalSCAPE’s position in the Internet software market is continuously threatened because the market is intensely competitive and technology is constantly changing.

The software industry is characterized by rapid technological change. GlobalSCAPE’s competitors are constantly releasing improved versions of their products. The needs and expectations of GlobalSCAPE’s customers are also evolving. Therefore, GlobalSCAPE must continually enhance its products and develop new products to remain competitive. When a new product is brought to market with functionality better suited to a particular use, the demand for currently available products may decrease. All of GlobalSCAPE’s products are subject to the threat of reduced market share resulting from the introduction of competitive products. GlobalSCAPE may fail to develop new products and functionalities as quickly as is necessary in the future to avoid losing its position in the Internet software market.

In addition to stand-alone FTP clients, CuteFTP competes with browsers, open source file sharing communities and download utilities, which provide subsets of the file transfer protocol functionality. These competing products may reduce the demand for CuteFTP.

In addition, software development generally requires substantial lead-time, so GlobalSCAPE must accurately predict what changes will be needed. GlobalSCAPE may fail to predict these changes far enough in advance, or it may not have sufficient technical personnel to make such changes. If GlobalSCAPE cannot keep pace, its products will lose their position in the market.

GlobalSCAPE utilizes “open source” software in some of its products.

The open source software community develops software technology for free use by anyone. We have relied on open source technology for the encryption features in our CuteFTP Pro and GlobalSCAPE Secure FTP Server products. For these products to remain competitive, we must continue to enhance their features, including the encryption features. If the open source community does not continue to develop and enhance the encryption technologies we rely on, we would have to license this technology. We may have to pay substantial fees for such a license, and it is possible that we would not be able to license this technology on any acceptable terms.

Future government regulation may increase our cost of doing business and reduce demand for our products.

New laws may be adopted to address areas such as taxation, privacy, copyrights, and quality of services, and existing laws may be applied to the Internet in unexpected ways. New laws and unexpected application of existing laws related to the Internet could create uncertainty in the Internet market place, which could increase our cost of doing business, reduce demand for our products, and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operations.

If an effective Internet sales tax scheme is implemented, demand for our products could be decreased.

GlobalSCAPE is not currently required to collect sales tax on its online sales except to customers in certain states. In general, state laws require that if the seller does not collect sales tax, residents who purchase goods online should remit sales tax to the appropriate taxing agency in the state where they live. However, state agencies rarely enforce this rule and we believe that less than 1% of our customers actually remit sales tax to their state taxing agencies. For practical purposes, most of our customers who do not pay sales tax to

us purchase their license on a tax-free basis. If an effective Internet sales tax scheme is implemented it would effectively increase the cost of our software in the eyes of our customers and therefore likely have a tendency to decrease demand for our software.

Taxes imposed by foreign governments may decrease demand for our products in those markets.

On July 1, 2003, the European Union (EU) enacted Value Added Taxes (VAT) on electronic purchases. These taxes are charged to our non-business customers in the EU member nations and rates vary by country. Western European countries account for a substantial portion of our international sales. These taxes, which vary in rate from 15% to 25%, may decrease demand for our products in these markets. Expansion in the number of the EU member nations may also decrease demand for our products as these taxes are imposed on more of our customers.

GlobalSCAPE may not be able to compete effectively with larger, better-positioned companies, resulting in lower margins and loss of market share.

GlobalSCAPE competes with a variety of companies who have significantly greater revenues and financial resources than GlobalSCAPE as well as greater personnel and technical resources. For example, CuteFTP and CuteFTP Pro compete with products offered by Ipswitch, Inc. and Microsoft Corporation, PureCMS competes with Macromedia Inc.’s software, and CuteSite Builder competes with Microsoft and Macromedia software. Large companies may be able to develop new technologies more quickly than GlobalSCAPE, to offer a broader array of products, and to respond more quickly to new opportunities, industry standards or customer requirements. For example, Macromedia’s Dreamweaver is one of the most popular Web authoring programs for consumers and small businesses, providing them with a huge established customer base to which they are able to directly market their content management product, Contribute. Some competitors may also be able to adopt more aggressive pricing strategies. For example, Ipswitch gives an older version of its file transfer protocol program away for free for non-commercial use, and Microsoft includes file transfer protocol functionality in its Internet browser, which it distributes for free. Increased competition may result in lower operating margins and loss of market share. Additional competitors may enter the market and may have significantly greater capabilities and resources than GlobalSCAPE. You should read the information under “Business-Competition” for more information on our competitors.

It may be difficult for GlobalSCAPE to recruit software developers and other technical and management personnel because GlobalSCAPE is a relatively small company.

GlobalSCAPE competes intensely with other Internet software development and distribution companies internationally to recruit and hire from a limited pool of qualified personnel. Some qualified candidates prefer to work for larger, better known companies. Failure to attract and maintain qualified personnel would impede our development and maintenance of new and existing products.

GlobalSCAPE’s ability to develop its software will be seriously impaired if it is not able to use its foreign subcontractors.

GlobalSCAPE relies on foreign subcontractors to help it develop its software. If these programmers decided to stop working for GlobalSCAPE, or if GlobalSCAPE were unable to continue using them because of political or economic instability, GlobalSCAPE would have difficulty finding comparably skilled developers. In addition, GlobalSCAPE would likely have to pay considerably more for the same work, especially if it used U.S. personnel. If GlobalSCAPE could not replace the programmers, it would take it significantly longer to develop its products.

GlobalSCAPE may incur losses as it attempts to expand its business.

GlobalSCAPE intends to expand its business and therefore expects to expend significant additional resources on developing its sales force, developing a more robust reseller program, research and development, marketing and product development. As a result, GlobalSCAPE may need to expend significant resources to accomplish these goals. If GlobalSCAPE fails to successfully develop and market

new products or improve its direct and channel sales results, it may not be able to achieve the necessary revenue growth and may not be profitable.

GlobalSCAPE’s operations are vulnerable to security breaches that could harm the quality of its products and services or disrupt its ability to deliver its products and services.

Third parties may breach GlobalSCAPE’s system security and damage its products and services or misappropriate confidential customer information. This might cause GlobalSCAPE to lose customers, or even cause customers to make claims on GlobalSCAPE for damages to them. In addition, GlobalSCAPE may be required to expend significant resources to protect against security breaches and/or to address problems caused by such breaches.

GlobalSCAPE’s products may expose customers to invasion of privacy, causing customer dissatisfaction.

GlobalSCAPE’s Secure FTP Server is intended to provide outsiders access to a customer’s computer, making the customer vulnerable to security breaches, which could result in the loss of their privacy or property. If customers suffer invasions of privacy or other harm, this may result in customer dissatisfaction and possible claims against us for any resulting damages.

GlobalSCAPE’s products may contain defects that may be costly to correct, delay market acceptance of its products and damage its reputation.

Errors may be found in GlobalSCAPE’s products after distribution. If errors are discovered, GlobalSCAPE may have to make significant expenditures of capital to eliminate them and may not be able to correct them in a timely manner or at all. Errors and failures in GlobalSCAPE’s products could result in a loss of, or delay in, market acceptance of its products and could damage its reputation.

GlobalSCAPE’s products rely on the prevalence of Windows-based operating systems and if that technology fails to maintain or improve market share, GlobalSCAPE’s products would not be as marketable.

Almost all of GlobalSCAPE’s current software products can only be used on a Windows-based operating system and are not compatible with other operating systems. Anything that affects Windows market share negatively could have a material adverse effect on the demand for GlobalSCAPE’s products.

GlobalSCAPE’s internal controls are limited, increasing the risk of employee mismanagement or error.

All of our finance, accounting and SEC disclosure work is managed by a single officer, Thomas F. Farar, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer. Mr. Farar has an accounting staff of two persons. Without an increase in staffing, it may still be difficult for us to implement the types of internal controls that are common to larger corporations, and we therefore face a greater risk of mismanagement or error in these areas.

Risks Related to Stock Ownership

Our stock is a penny stock, which makes it more difficult to sell.

A “penny stock” is any stock which is not traded on a national exchange or quoted on NASDAQ and which falls below a selling price of $5.00 per share in the public market. Our common stock is quoted on the NASD’s OTC Bulletin Board and not on an exchange or the NASDAQ, and it has traded from $0.10 to $1.05 since it began active trading in February 2002. The SEC’s penny stock rules require brokers and dealers to take certain steps before trading in a penny stock, making it more difficult to sell a penny stock than other stock. A sale of penny stock does not usually take place as quickly as a sale of other stock. You may decide to sell your stock when the market price is desirable to you, but by the time the sale is complete, the price of the stock may have fallen to the point that the sale is no longer desirable. The price of penny stocks is typically more volatile than other stocks, exacerbating this problem. Also, some brokers are unwilling to trade in shares of penny stocks.

Our stock price is/may be volatile.

The trading price of our common stock has been and could continue to be subject to wide fluctuations in response to certain factors, including:

• Quarter-to-quarter variations in results of operations;

• Our announcements of new products;

• Our competitors’ announcements of new products;

• Our product development or release schedule;

• General conditions in the software industry;

• Investor perceptions and expectations regarding our products, plans and strategic position and those of our competitors and customers.

In addition, the public stock markets experience extreme price and trading volume volatility, particularly in high-technology sectors of the market. This volatility has significantly affected the market prices of securities of many technology companies for reasons often unrelated to the operating performance of the specific companies. The broad market fluctuations may adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

We do not pay dividends on our common stock.

We have not paid a dividend on our common stock and have no plan to do so in the near future.

Our principal shareholders may control our management decisions.

Thomas Brown and David Mann, own approximately 70% of our outstanding common stock. Therefore, Mr. Brown and Mr. Mann are able to exercise significant influence over all matters requiring shareholder approval, including the election of directors and approval of significant corporate transactions. This concentration of ownership may delay or prevent a change of control of GlobalSCAPE or discourage a potential acquirer from attempting to obtain control of GlobalSCAPE, either of which could have an adverse effect on the value of our common stock.

Anti-takeover provisions in GlobalSCAPE’s charter and Delaware law could inhibit others from acquiring GlobalSCAPE.

Some of the provisions of GlobalSCAPE’s certificate of incorporation and bylaws and in Delaware law could, together or separately:

• discourage potential acquisition proposals;

• delay or prevent a change in control; and

• limit the price that investors may be willing to pay in the future for shares of GlobalSCAPE’s common stock.

In particular, GlobalSCAPE’s certificate of incorporation and bylaws provide for, among other things, limitations on the individuals that may call meetings of the stockholders and do not allow for cumulative voting. GlobalSCAPE is also subject to Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which generally prohibits a Delaware corporation from engaging in any of a broad range of business combinations with any interested stockholder, as defined in the statute, for a period of three years following the date on which the stockholder became an interested stockholder.

Stockholders’ ownership of GlobalSCAPE stock may be significantly diluted, affecting the value of the stock.

There are options for 1,970,071 shares currently outstanding under GlobalSCAPE’s employee stock option plans as of the date of this report. Of the 1,970,071 options, 1,430,151 are vested. We have filed a registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) covering stock issued upon the exercise of options by non-affiliates, and we may file a registration statement covering options held by affiliates as well. If we do not file a registration statement covering affiliates, affiliates who exercise their options may choose to sell the stock under an exemption from registration, such as Rule 144 under the Securities Act. The exercise of these options and sale of the resulting stock could depress the value of our stock.

Risks Related to Legal Uncertainty

GlobalSCAPE is vulnerable to claims that GlobalSCAPE’s products infringe third-party intellectual property rights particularly because GlobalSCAPE’s products are partially developed by independent parties.

GlobalSCAPE may be exposed to future litigation based on claims that GlobalSCAPE’s products infringe the intellectual property rights of others. This risk is exacerbated by the fact that some of the code in GlobalSCAPE’s products is developed by independent parties or licensed from third parties over whom GlobalSCAPE has less control than it exercises over internal developers. In addition, we expect that infringement claims against software developers will become more prevalent as the number of products and developers grows and the functionality of software programs in the market increasingly overlaps. Claims of infringement could require GlobalSCAPE to re-engineer its products or seek to obtain licenses from third parties in order to continue offering its products. In addition, an adverse legal decision affecting GlobalSCAPE’s intellectual property, or the use of significant resources to defend against this type of claim could place a significant strain on GlobalSCAPE’s financial resources and harm its reputation.

GlobalSCAPE may not be able to protect its intellectual property rights.

GlobalSCAPE’s software code, and trade and service marks are some of GlobalSCAPE’s most valuable assets. Given the global nature of the Internet and GlobalSCAPE’s business, GlobalSCAPE is vulnerable to the misappropriation of this intellectual property, particularly in foreign markets, such as China and Eastern Europe, where laws or law enforcement practices are less developed. The global nature of the Internet makes it difficult to control the ultimate destination or security of GlobalSCAPE’s software making it more likely that unauthorized third parties will copy certain portions of GlobalSCAPE’s proprietary information or reverse engineer the proprietary information used in its programs. If GlobalSCAPE’s proprietary rights were infringed by a third-party, and GlobalSCAPE did not have adequate legal recourse, GlobalSCAPE’s ability to earn profits, which are highly dependent on those rights, would be severely diminished.

Other companies may own, obtain or claim trademarks that could prevent, limit or interfere with GlobalSCAPE’s use of its trademarks.

GlobalSCAPE’s various trademarks are important to its business. If GlobalSCAPE were to lose the use of any its trademarks, its business would be harmed and GlobalSCAPE would have to devote substantial resources towards developing an independent brand identity. Defending or enforcing GlobalSCAPE’s trademark rights at a local and international level could result in the expenditure of significant financial and managerial resources.

Part II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity

Our common stock is listed on the NASD’s OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol GSCP. As of March 19, 2004, there were 2,620 holders of record of our common stock representing approximately 9,000 beneficial owners. GlobalSCAPE stock began trading on February 15, 2002. The table below sets forth the quarterly high and low bid prices for our common stock for the Company’s last two fiscal years.

Common Stock Price

	2003				2004
Fiscal Year ended December 31,	High		Low		High		Low
Annual	$	0.36	$	0.10	$	0.27	$	0.10
First Quarter (ending March 31)	$	0.13	$	0.10	$	0.27	$	0.16
Second Quarter (ending June 30)	$	0.36	$	0.11	$	0.18	$	0.10
Third Quarter (ending September 30)	$	0.23	$	0.12	$	0.18	$	0.10
Fourth Quarter (ending December 31)	$	0.16	$	0.13	$	0.21	$	0.13

The closing bid price on March 2, 2005 was $0.20. Over-the-counter market quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down, or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.

We have never paid a cash dividend, and do not expect to do so in the foreseeable future. We expect to reinvest all of our earnings in the further growth of the business.

The information required to be disclosed in this Item regarding equity compensation plans is disclosed in Item 12 of this Annual Report.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

The selected financial data presented below for the years ended December 31, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2004 are derived from our audited financial statements.

	Years ended December 31,
	2000			2001			2002			2003			2004
Revenues:
Software product revenues	$	5,165,668		$	5,259,148		$	5,269,503		$	4,847,119		$	4,930,660
Advertising revenues	570,008			38,540			—			—			—
Total revenues	5,735,676			5,297,688			5,269,503			4,847,119			4,930,660
Operating expenses:
Cost of revenues (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below)	200,118			323,309			353,918			532,910			371,242
Selling, general and administrative	3,463,044			3,551,498			3,580,361			3,613,759			3,456,598
Research and development	961,002			1,176,714			848,212			945,395			727,423
Depreciation and amortization	430,221			546,017			544,063			390,154			171,834
Settlement with ATSI Comm. Inc.	—			—			392,905			—			—
Total operating expenses	5,054,385			5,597,538			5,719,459			5,482,218			4,727,097
Income (loss) from operations	681,291			(299,850		)	(449,956		)	(635,099		)	203,563
Interest expense, net	(42,839		)	4,420			11,783			(5,016		)	(1,651		)
Gain (loss) on sale of assets	(13,687		)	—			—			(1,486		)	—
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes	624,765			(295,430		)	(438,173		)	(641,601		)	201,912
Total income tax provision (benefit)	310,126			(38,295		)	175,202			1,400			1,498
Net income (loss)	$	314,639		$	(257,135	)	$	(613,375	)	$	(643,001	)	200,423
Net income (loss) per common share - basic	$	0.02		$	(0.02	)	$	(0.05	)	$	(0.05	)	$	0.01
Net income (loss) per common share -assuming dilution	$	0.02		$	(0.02	)	$	(0.05	)	$	(0.05	)	$	0.01

	December 31,
	2000			2001			2002			2003		2004

Cash	$	113,591		$	134,537		$	480,609		$	342,433	$	572,959
Working capital (deficit)	161,939			498,134			368,567			19,203		341,749
Total assets	2,122,094			2,009,806			1,412,042			918,278		971,857
Long term debt including capital lease obligations, less current portion	149,074			77,080			15,477			—		—
Cash dividends per common share	$		—	$		—	$		—	$	—	$	—

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation

Overview

GlobalSCAPE develops and distributes Internet related software including file management, content management and Web development tools. We distribute our software primarily via download from our Internet website. During 2004, approximately 64% of our revenues were generated from customers within the United States, with the remaining 36% concentrated mostly in Western Europe, Canada and Australia. CuteFTP and CuteFTP Pro accounted for approximately 75% and 69% of total revenues in 2003 and 2004 respectively. Combined sales of these two products declined approximately 7% from 2003 to 2004. This decline was primarily in sales of CuteFTP, which declined approximately 36%. Sales of CuteFTP Pro increased by approximately 41% year over year and sales of Secure Server, a companion product to CuteFTP Pro, increased 107%. Secure Server accounted for approximately 14% of total revenues in 2004, increasing from 7% of total revenues in 2003.

Substantially all software products ultimately reach a point in their lifecycle in which sales can be expected to plateau or decline. While it cannot be determined with certainty, CuteFTP and CuteFTP Pro may have reached such a point their lifecycles. Management believes that the market for stand-alone FTP clients for home consumers may be declining. However, we have not seen the same decline in the market for secure FTP clients and servers such as CuteFTP Pro and Secure Server which we believe better target the needs of businesses.

Our strategy is to continue enhancing our file transfer products across the board to meet the demands of both individual and enterprise users, while improving the security features of our current product line. We dedicated considerable resources in the fourth quarter of 2002 and in 2003 to the development and market launch of PureCMS, our content management product. To date, we have not been as successful in selling this product as we had anticipated. We laid off 9 of 45 employees on February 12, 2004 in order to bring our expenses in line with our current operating performance.

We are encouraged with the interest we see in our new enhanced file transfer offerings so far in 2005. We will continue to address security issues for our customers. We intend to release new versions of CuteFTP, CuteFTP Pro and Secure Server early in 2005 and we believe we can slow the decline in sales of CuteFTP and improve sales of CuteFTP Pro and Secure Server. We plan on releasing additional versions of EFT throughout 2005.

The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read in conjunction with our financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 and related notes included elsewhere in this document.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We rely heavily on cash flows from operations and these cash flows are directly linked to CuteFTP and CuteFTP Pro, which accounted for 75% and 69% of our revenues in 2003 and 2004, respectively. Anything that has a negative impact on these products will negatively impact our cash flow from operations and our ability to meet our commitments. Demand for our products could be affected by many factors including rapid technological obsolescence. For more discussion on the risks that might affect demand for our products, you should read the information under “Risk Factors” in this Annual Report.

We incurred significant operating losses during the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2003 and continued, in January, February and March of 2004, to incur significant operating losses. In February 2004 we reduced our workforce by 20%, laying off 9 of the 45 people then employed by the Company. This workforce reduction was a necessary step in improving the overall financial health of the organization. We had anticipated stronger revenue performance in January and February after poorer than expected sales in

the fourth quarter of 2003 and had maintained staffing levels with this objective. These higher revenue targets were not met, further reducing the Company’s liquidity position.

The Company’s liquidity could be further reduced in 2005 if sales of CuteFTP continue to decline and the Company is unable to successfully introduce new products or increase sales of existing products.

If sales continue to decline or the Company’s liquidity otherwise requires, management has the intent and ability to substantially reduce personnel and personnel-related costs, reduce or substantially eliminate capital expenditures and/or reduce or substantially eliminate research and development expenditures.

In addition, the Company could draw on its $250,000 line of credit, if necessary. This line of credit, which matured in December 2004, has been renewed through March 2006. The interest rate is subject to change and is indexed to the bank’s prime rate. The initial rate is 7.25%. In connection with the line of credit, GlobalSCAPE entered into a commercial security agreement with the bank whereby GlobalSCAPE granted a security interest in all its accounts and equipment. The Company borrowed $100,000 on September 11, 2003 under this agreement. This amount was repaid in February 2004. The credit facility is available to the Company at any point during its term.

The Company’s flexibility in reacting to changes in the operating environment and to changing economic conditions may be limited by the Company’s current liquidity position. However, management believes that, if required, it will be able to effect some or all of the components of the plan set forth above, which are sufficient in the aggregate to enable the Company to continue as a going concern through at least December 31, 2005. Accordingly, the financial statements of the Company do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects or the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that may result if the Company cannot improve its working capital position additionally.

Net cash provided (used) by operating activities was $483,077, ($105,548) and $384,314 in 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively. Net cash provided by operating activities in 2002 was primarily due to adjustments related to depreciation and amortization and the settlement with ATSI, offset by the loss for the period. Net cash used in operating activities in 2003 was primarily the result of the net loss for the period offset somewhat by depreciation and amortization charges for the period. In 2004, net cash provided resulted from net income, adjustments related to depreciation and amortization as well as decreased accounts receivable.

Net cash used in investing activities for 2002, 2003 and 2004 was $87,822, $73,027, and $42,250 respectively. In 2002, we loaned $200,000 to ATSI, our parent company, but received $200,000 in cash as part of the settlement agreement. In addition, we purchased $87,822 in computer hardware and software in 2002. In 2003, we capitalized the purchase of $73,027 in equipment and software. In 2004, we capitalized the purchase of $42,250 in equipment and software.

Net cash provided (used) in financing activities during 2002, 2003 and 2004 was ($ 49,183), $40,399 and ($111,538), respectively. In 2002, we made principal payments of $71,321 on capital lease obligations and received $22,138 for the exercise of stock options. In 2003, we made principal payments of $61,317 on capital lease obligations and borrowed $100,000 under our line of credit and received $1,716 for the exercise of stock options. In 2004, we made principal payments on notes payable of $100,000 and made principal payments of $15,294 on capital lease obligations and received $3,756 for the exercise of stock options. We did not enter any new capital leases in 2004.

As of December 31, 2004, we had $572,959 in cash, current assets of $812,637 and current liabilities of $470,888, resulting in working capital of $341,749. This resulted in a working capital improvement of $322,546 over December 31, 2003. Our principal commitments consisted of obligations outstanding under operating leases as well as royalty agreements with third parties. The commitments related to royalty agreements are not fixed, rather they are contingent on sales. We plan to continue to expend significant resources on product development in future periods and may also use our cash to acquire

or license technology, products or businesses related to our current business. We expect that operating expenses will continue to be a material use of our cash resources as well, but will manage the business based on the immediately foreseeable operating cash flows. The facility that we currently occupy is expected to be sufficient for the next twelve months. Consequently, we do not anticipate significant expenditures for leasehold improvements or furniture for 2005.

The following table summarizes our contractual obligations at December 31, 2004, consisting of future minimum capital lease payments and future minimum payments under operating leases:

	Payments due by period
Contractual obligations	Total		Less than 1 year		1-3 years		3-5 years		More than 5 years
Operating lease obligations	$	667,306	$	190,659	$	381,318	$	95,329	$	—
Total	$	667,306	$	190,659	$	381,318	$	95,329	$	—

Critical Accounting Policies

Use of Estimates

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations are based upon the Company’s financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the Unites States. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates its estimates and judgments, including those related to revenue recognition, allowance for doubtful accounts receivable, long-lived and intangible assets, income taxes and contingencies. Management bases its estimates on historical experience, observable trends, and various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Management uses this information to make judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent form other sources. Actual results may differ from the estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Management believes the following critical accounting policies affect its more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of its financial statements.

Revenue Recognition

Our revenue is generated primarily by licensing our software products and providing support for those products. Revenues are comprised of the gross selling price of the software, including shipping charges and the earned portion of support and maintenance agreements. In periods where we had revenue from advertising, we recognized the net proceeds received from advertisers as revenue. The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Statement of Position (“SOP”) 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, as modified by SOP 98-9, Modification of SOP 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, With Respect to Certain Transactions.

Revenues from the sale of software products are recognized and completely earned upon shipment or electronic delivery of the product provided that persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, collection is probable, payment terms are fixed and determinable and no significant obligations remain. The majority of our sales are delivered electronically via email.

We also sell technical support and maintenance agreements (post contract customer support “PCS”), which are sometimes bundled with the software. When vendor specific objective evidence

(“VSOE”) of fair value exists for all elements in a multiple element arrangement, revenue is allocated to each element based on the relative fair value of each of the elements. VSOE of fair value is established by the price charged when the same element is sold separately. In a multiple element arrangement whereby VSOE of fair value of all undelivered elements exists but VSOE of fair value does not exist for one or more delivered elements, revenue is recognized using the residual method. Under the residual method, the fair value of the undelivered elements is deferred and the remaining portion of the arrangement fee is recognized as revenue, assuming collection is probable. Revenue allocated to PCS is recognized ratably over the contractual term, typically one year. We sometimes sell installation and training services with our PureCMS and EFT products. Revenue for installation and training is recognized when performed.

The Company began selling technical support and maintenance services for some of its software products in 2001. Deferred revenue grew to a balance of approximately $142,000 at December 31, 2002 and remained relatively flat, ending 2003 with a balance of approximately $140,000. Sales of these agreements continued to grow in 2004 with higher priced support and maintenance for our enterprise class software products and our efforts to renew agreements upon their expiration. Growth in the sales of maintenance and support agreements may result in the deferred recognition of a significant amount of revenue in future periods.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

We provide credit, in the normal course of business, to a number of companies and perform ongoing evaluations of our credit risk. We require no collateral from our customers and we estimate the allowance for uncollectible accounts based on our historical experience and current credit evaluations. No single customer accounted for more than 2% of net revenues in 2002, 2003 or 2004.

Valuation of Long-Lived and Intangible Assets

The Company assesses the impairment of long-lived and intangible assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors considered important which could trigger an impairment review included the following: significant underperformance relative to historical or projected future cash flows; significant changes in the manner of use of the assets or the strategy for the overall business; and significant negative industry trends. When management determines that the carrying value of long-lived and intangible assets may not be recoverable, impairment is measured based on the excess of the assets’ carrying value over the estimated fair value. No impairment was recognized in 2002, 2003 or 2004.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company measures compensation expense for its stock-based employee compensation plans, which are described in Note 8. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (SFAS 123), encourages, but does not require, companies to record compensation cost for stock-based employee compensation plans based on the fair market value of options granted. The Company chose to account for stock based compensation using the intrinsic value method prescribed in APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations. Accordingly, compensation expense is recorded to the extent that the current market price of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price. On December 31, 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard 148, Accounting for Stock Based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure (SFAS 148), which amends SFAS 123. SFAS 148 requires more prominent and frequent disclosures about the effects of stock-based compensation. The Company will continue to account for its stock-based compensation according to the provisions of APB Opinion No. 25. The pro forma disclosure requirements prescribed by SFAS 123, as amended by SFAS 148 are included in Note 1 to the Financial Statements.

See note 1 to the financial statements on page 43 under the heading Stock Options. The Company will adopt the fair value method of accounting for stock options during the third quarter of 2005.

Research and Development

Research and development expenses include all direct costs, primarily salaries for personnel and expenditures with external development sources, related to the development of new products and significant enhancements to existing products and are expensed as incurred until such time as technological feasibility is achieved. For the years 2002, 2003 and 2004, we spent approximately $848,000, $945,000 and $728,000 respectively, on research and development. No research and development expenses were capitalized in 2002, 2003 or 2004 and all previously capitalized research and development expenses were fully amortized at December 31, 2002.

Income Taxes

GlobalSCAPE accounts for income taxes using the liability method in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. The liability method provides that the deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded based on the difference between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amount for financial reporting purposes, as measured by the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are carried on the balance sheet with the presumption that they will be realizable in future periods when pre-tax income is generated. Predicting the ability to realize these assets in future periods requires a great deal of judgment by management. Although we have generated pre-tax income in previous years, unusual or infrequently occurring transactions resulted in pre-tax losses in 2001 and 2002 (compensation charges in 2001 and the settlement with ATSI and termination of CEO in 2002). It is our judgment that we cannot predict with reasonable certainty that the tax assets resulting from these losses and the loss incurred in 2003 will be fully realized in future periods. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 109 requires a valuation allowance to reduce the deferred tax assets reported if, based on the weight of the evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. After consideration of all of the evidence, both positive and negative, management determined that a $540,350 valuation allowance at December 31, 2003 and $484,853 valuation allowance at December 31, 2004, was necessary to reduce the deferred tax assets to the amount that will more likely than not be realized. The change in the valuation allowance for the current year is a net decrease of $55,497. At December 31, 2004, GlobalSCAPE has available net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $1,249,000, which expire beginning in the year 2020.

Comparison of Year Ended December 31, 2004 to Year Ended December 31, 2003

Revenue. We derive our revenues primarily from software sales. Revenue is comprised of the gross selling price of software, including shipping charges and the earned portion of support and maintenance agreements. Revenues increased approximately 2% from 2003 to 2004, from $4,847,119 in 2003 to $4,930,660 in 2004. Unit volume was relatively flat with approximately 175,000 sold in 2003 versus 170,000 in 2004. The increase in revenues was pronounced in the fourth quarter when compared to the same periods in 2003. We believe the economic uncertainty in the first three quarters of 2004 contributed to those periods’ poor performance along with the turnover in our sales force. Our fourth quarter revenues increased approximately 11% over the same quarter in 2003.

In 2003 and 2004, approximately 75% and 69%, respectively, of our revenues were generated from sales of CuteFTP and CuteFTP Pro. Combined sales of these products declined approximately 7% year over year. Sales of CuteFTP declined approximately 36% while sales of CuteFTP Pro increased approximately 41%. Our reliance on these products may negatively impact future results from operations if we are unable to maintain revenues from these products or successfully introduce new product offerings. (For more information, you should read the section titled Risks Related to Operations.)

cost of sales when the software product is sold or earlier if the recoverability of any prepaid royalties is in doubt. The Company has distribution agreements with Hannon Hill Corp., Trellix Corp., Perseus Development Corp., Beehive Software, Inc., Visicom Media, Inc., and Turillion Software Technologies. The GlobalSCAPE software products associated with each of the companies are PureCMS, CuteSITE Builder, Web Survey, Mac FTP, CuteHTML Pro and Protect IIS, respectively. GlobalSCAPE no longer distributes the Protect IIS product and expensed prepaid royalties of approximately $15,000 in December 2003. GlobalSCAPE’s agreement with Hannon Hill Corp. required a minimum royalty of $16,667 per month, as prepayment of royalties, for 12 months beginning in December 2002. These payments were expensed as paid because the lower than expected sales of PureCMS raised doubt as to the realization of benefit from these prepayments. The total amount expensed in 2003 relating to these prepayments was $183,337. As a result of, we expect the cost of revenues to remain consistent both as a percentage of sales and in gross terms in 2005 when compared to 2004.

Selling, General and Administrative. Selling, general and administrative expenses consist primarily of personnel and related expenses, marketing, customer support, professional fees, rent, bad debt and credit card transaction fees. Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased approximately 4% a year from $3,613,759 in 2003 to $3,456,598 in 2004. The number of persons employed by GlobalSCAPE was reduced from 45 to 36 in February 2004. As of March 3, 2005 the number of employees was 39.

For comparative purposes, selling, general and administrative expenses for 2003 includes approximately $540,000 in advertising expenses, relating primarily to the launch of the PureCMS product, as compared to $205,000 in 2004. Selling, general and administrative expenses also include approximately $134,900 in amortization of the CuteFTP trademark in 2003, when it was fully amortized.

Research and Development. Research and development expenses decreased approximately 23% from $945,395 in 2003 to $727,423 due to layoff of employees in February 2004 and related salaries, payroll taxes and benefits costs. External development costs increased approximately 11% from 2003 to 2004. External development was increased to offset the loss of internal labor due to the layoff in order to maintain the scheduled releases of CuteFTP, CuteFTP Pro, Secure FTP Server, PureCMS and EFT.

Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense consists of depreciation expense related to our fixed assets and the amortization of the trademark associated with our purchase of CuteFTP in 1998. Depreciation and amortization expense declined $218,320 or approximately 56% year over year. This decrease was due primarily to a reduction in amortization expense. The purchase of CuteFTP was fully amortized as of September 20, 2003. In addition, depreciation expense has declined due to a slowdown in additions to fixed assets in current periods relative to prior periods.

Interest Expense, Net. In 2003, we had interest expense of $5,016 related primarily to capital leases. In 2004, we had interest expense of $1,651 related primarily to an advance on our line of credit and financing of insurance premiums.

Income Taxes. The provision for state income taxes in 2003 was $1,400 and there was no provision for federal income taxes in 2003. GlobalSCAPE’s effective income tax rate was negative 0.2% and differs from the federal rate primarily because of a change in the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets. The provision for state income taxes in 2004 was $1,489 and there was no provison for federal income taxes in 2004. GlobalSCAPE’s effective income tax rate is 0.7% and differs from the federal rate primarily because of a change in the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets.

Net Income. In 2003, the net loss was primarily the result of disappointing revenue performance in the first and fourth quarters exacerbated by the product launch expenses related to PureCMS. In 2004, the net income was primarily the result of a slight increase in revenue, a decrease in the cost of revenues, SG&A, research and development and depreciation costs. Significant effort was put in to controlling expenses in 2004, including the layoff of 9 employees.

Comparison of Year Ended December 31, 2003 to Year Ended December 31, 2002

Revenue. We derive our revenues primarily from software sales. Revenue is comprised of the gross selling price of software, including shipping charges and the earned portion of support and maintenance agreements. Revenues declined approximately 8% from 2002 to 2003, from $5,269,503 in 2002 to $4,847,119 in 2003. Unit volume was relatively flat with approximately 172,000 sold in 2002 versus 175,000 in 2003. The decline in revenues was pronounced in the first and fourth quarters when compared to the same periods in 2002. We believe the economic uncertainty in the first quarter of 2003 contributed to that period’s poor performance and the turnover in our sales force contributed to the weaker than expected performance in the fourth quarter of 2003.

In 2002 and 2003, approximately 85% and 75%, respectively, of our revenues were generated from sales of CuteFTP and CuteFTP Pro. Combined sales of these products declined approximately 21% year over year. Sales of CuteFTP declined approximately 29% while sales of CuteFTP Pro declined approximately 2%. Our reliance on these products may negatively impact future results from operations if we are unable to maintain revenues from these products or successfully introduce new product offerings. (For more information, you should read the section titled Risks Related to Operations.)

Cost of Revenues. Cost of revenues consists primarily of royalties, a portion of our bandwidth costs as well as production, packaging and shipping costs for boxed copies of software products. Cost of revenues increased approximately 51% between periods from $353,918 in 2002 to $532,910 in 2003 due to an increase in royalty expenses related to our software distribution agreements with third parties. Royalties that the Company pays on software products licensed from third parties, which it resells, are expensed as a cost of sales when the software product is sold or earlier if the recoverability of any prepaid royalties is in doubt. The Company has distribution agreements with Hannon Hill Corp., Trellix Corp., Perseus Development Corp., Beehive Software, Inc., Visicom Media, Inc., and Turillion Software Technologies. The GlobalSCAPE software products associated with each of the companies are PureCMS, CuteSITE Builder, Web Survey, Mac FTP, CuteHTML Pro and Protect IIS, respectively. GlobalSCAPE no longer distributes the Protect IIS product and expensed prepaid royalties of approximately $15,000 in December 2003. GlobalSCAPE’s agreement with Hannon Hill Corp. required a minimum royalty of $16,667 per month, as prepayment of royalties, for 12 months beginning in December 2002. These payments were expensed as paid because the lower than expected sales of PureCMS raised doubt as to the realization of benefit from these prepayments. The total amount expensed in 2003 relating to these prepayments was $183,337.

Selling, General and Administrative. Selling, general and administrative expenses consist primarily of personnel and related expenses, marketing, customer support, professional fees, rent, bad debt and credit card transaction fees. Selling, general and administrative expenses grew approximately one percent year over year from $3,580,361 in 2002 to $3,613,759 in 2003. The number of persons employed by GlobalSCAPE grew from 39 at the end of 2002 to 45 by December 2003.

For comparative purposes, selling, general and administrative expenses for 2002 includes reductions to SG&A expense of $62,396 for non-cash charges related to stock options and $190,000 in severance payments to our former CEO, Tim Nicolaou, which were not incurred in 2003. Selling, general and administrative expenses also include approximately $300,000 in advertising expenses in 2002, which increased to $540,000 in 2003, both of which relate primarily to the launch of the PureCMS product.

Research and Development. Research and development expenses increased approximately 11% from $848,212 in 2002 to $945,395 due to increased expenditures on both internal and external product development resources. We increased spending substantially in the fourth quarter of 2003 on external development resources as part of the planned 2004 releases of new versions of CuteFTP, CuteFTP Pro and Secure FTP Server.

Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense consists of depreciation expense related to our fixed assets and the amortization of the trademark associated with our purchase of CuteFTP in 1998. Depreciation and amortization expense declined $153,909 or approximately 28% year over year. This decrease was due primarily to a reduction in amortization expense. Previously capitalized software development costs were fully amortized at December 31, 2002 and the purchase of CuteFTP was fully amortized as of September 20, 2003. In addition, depreciation expense has declined due to a slowdown in additions to fixed assets in current periods relative to prior periods.

Settlement of Due from Parent Balance. On June 11, 2002, ATSI Communications, Inc. sold its majority interest in GlobalSCAPE, Inc. to Brown and Mann-GlobalSCAPE Joint Venture, a Texas general partnership owned by San Antonio-based investors Thomas W. Brown and David L. Mann. Contemporaneously with this transaction, GlobalSCAPE agreed to compromise and settle a $612,304 inter-company balance owed to it by ATSI, which resulted in charges to GlobalSCAPE of $392,905. The balance was settled for (i) $200,000 in cash from ATSI; (ii) NTFC Capital Corporation’s release of GlobalSCAPE as a co-borrower on a capital lease executed by ATSI in 1999, and (iii) ATSI’s agreement to provide $50,000 worth of transition support services to GlobalSCAPE over the nine months ending March 11, 2003, including payroll administration and GlobalSCAPE’s continued use of a shared accounting platform. However, we completed our transition from ATSI’s payroll and accounting systems during the third quarter of 2002 and expensed the remainder of the support services as selling, general and administrative expenses, approximately $46,000, during that quarter. In addition, prepaid insurance coverage under a joint policy with ATSI was lost to GlobalSCAPE as a result of the change in control, resulting in a charge against GlobalSCAPE’s prepaid assets of $27,083 during the second quarter of 2002.

Interest Expense, Net. In 2002, we had interest expense of $8,973 related to capital leases and interest income of $20,756 from loans made to ATSI prior to our separation and settlement of the balance owed to GlobalSCAPE by ATSI. In 2003, we had interest expense of $5,016 related primarily to capital leases. We do not expect to generate interest income in future periods.

Income Taxes. The provision for federal income taxes was $146,932 for 2002. The provision for state income taxes was $28,270 for the same period. GlobalSCAPE’s effective income tax rate was negative 40% in 2002 and differs from the federal rate primarily because of a change in the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets. The provision for state income taxes in 2003 was $1,400 and there was no provision for federal income taxes in 2003. GlobalSCAPE’s effective income tax rate was negative 0.2% and differs from the federal rate primarily because of a change in the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets.

Net Income. In 2002, the net loss was a result of both the settlement with ATSI and the termination of our former CEO. These two events combined for more than $580,000 in expenses whereas our loss from operations was about $450,000. In 2003, the net loss was primarily the result of disappointing revenue performance in the first and fourth quarters exacerbated by the product launch expenses related to PureCMS.

Inflation

Increases in inflation generally result in higher interest rates and operating costs. Our largest cost exposure is the cost of salaries and general and administrative expenses. To date we believe that inflation has not had a significant impact on our operations.

GlobalSCAPE, Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

	December 31,
	2003		2004
Assets
Current assets:
Cash	$	342,433	$	572,959
Accounts receivable (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $43,581 and $10,195 in 2003 and 2004, respectively)	240,615		148,534
Prepaid expenses	46,428		91,144
Total current assets	629,476		812,637

Property and equipment:
Furniture and fixtures	332,920		332,920
Software	235,436		245,601
Equipment	590,019		608,718
Leasehold improvements	154,376		167,762
	1,312,751		1,355,001
Accumulated depreciation and amortization	1,035,830		1,207,663
Net property and equipment	276,921		147,338

Other assets:
Other	11,881		11,882
Total other assets	11,881		11,882

Total assets	$	918,278	$	971,857

GlobalSCAPE, Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

	December 31,
	2003			2004
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	180,555		$	122,117
Accrued expenses	173,935			170,654
Deferred revenue	140,489			178,117
Notes payable	100,000			—
Current portion of capital lease obligation	15,294			—
Total current liabilities	610,273			470,888

Long-term liabilities:
Other long-term liabilities	39,253			28,038
Total long-term liabilities	39,253			28,038

Total Liabilities	649,526			498,926

Commitments and contingencies

Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share, 10,000,000 authorized, no shares issued or outstanding	—			—
Common stock, par value $0.001 per share, 40,000,000 shares authorized, 13,488,619 and 13,773,219 shares issued and Outstanding at December 31, 2003 and 2004, respectively	13,489			13,773
Additional paid-in capital	671,893			675,365
Retained deficit	(416,630		)	(216,207		)
Total stockholders’ equity	268,752			472,931
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	918,278		$	971,857

See accompanying notes.

GlobalSCAPE, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Operations

	For the Years ended December 31,
	2002			2003			2004
Operating revenues:
Software product revenues	$	5,269,503		$	4,847,119		$	4,930,660
Total revenues	5,269,503			4,847,119			4,930,660

Operating expenses:
Cost of revenues (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below)	353,918			532,910			371,242
Selling, general and administrative Expenses	3,580,361			3,613,759			3,456,598
Research and development expenses	848,212			945,395			727,423
Depreciation and amortization	544,063			390,154			171,834
Settlement with ATSI Comm. Inc.	392,905			—			—
Total operating expense	5,719,459			5,482,218			4,727,097
Income (Loss) from operations	(449,956		)	(635,099		)	203,563

Other income (expense):
Interest expense	(8,973		)	(5,016		)	(1,651		)
Interest income	20,756			—			—
Loss on sale of assets	—			(1,486		)	—
Total other income (expense)	11,783			(6,502		)	(1,651		)
Income (loss) before income taxes	(438,173		)	(641,601		)	201,912

Income tax provision:
Current:
Federal	—			—			—
State	15,040			1,400			1,489
Deferred:
Federal	146,932			—			—
State	13,230			—			—
Total income tax provision	175,202			1,400			1,489

Net income (loss)	$	(613,375	)	$	(643,001	)	$	200,423

Net income (loss) per common share – basic	$	(0.05	)	$	(0.05	)	$	0.01
Net income (loss) per common share - assuming dilution	$	(0.05	)	$	(0.05	)	$	0.01

Weighted average shares outstanding- basic	13,279,263			13,361,706			13,668,800
Weighted average shares outstanding- assuming dilution	13,279,263			13,361,706			14,262,796

See accompanying notes.

GlobalSCAPE, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity

	Common Stock			Additional paid in Capital			Retained Earnings (Deficit)			Total
	Shares	Amount
Balances at December 31, 2001	13,022,190	$	13,022	$	707,902		$	839,746		$	1,560,670
Net loss	—	—		—			(613,375		)	(613,375		)
Exercise of stock options	326,429	327		21,811			—			22,138
Issuance of common stock	10,000	10		2,990			—			3,000
Charges related to stock options subject to variable accounting	—	—		(33,690		)	—			(33,690		)
Exercise of stock options for which compensation expense had previously been recognized	—	—		(28,706		)	—			(28,706		)
Balances at December 31, 2002	13,358,619	13,359		670,307			226,371			910,037
Net loss	—	—		—			(643,001		)	(643,001		)
Exercise of options	130,000	130		1,586			—			1,716
Balances at December 31, 2003	13,488,619	13,489		671,893			(416,630		)	268,752
Net Income	—	—		—			200,423			200,423
Exercise of options	284,600	284		3,472			—			3,756
Balances at December 31, 2004	13,773,219	$	13,773	$	675,365		$	(216,207	)	$	472,931

See accompanying notes.

GlobalSCAPE, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

	For the Years ended December 31,
	2002			2003			2004
Operating Activities:
Net Income (Loss)	$	(613,375	)	$	(643,001	)	$	200,423
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided (used) by operating activities:
Bad debt expense	102,261			14,508			(17,087		)
Depreciation and amortization	544,063			390,154			171,833
Non-cash compensation	(59,396		)	—			—
Loss on disposition of assets	—			1,486			—
Deferred taxes	146,932			—			—
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable	(170,234		)	(3,354		)	109,167
Due from ATSI, Comm. Inc.	461,124			—			—
Prepaid expenses	(52,488		)	25,821			(44,716		)
Accounts payable	61,181			55,660			(58,438		)
Accrued expenses	(56,197		)	65,440			(3,281		)
Deferred revenue	130,422			(1,047		)	37,628
Other long-term liabilities	(11,216		)	(11,215		)	(11,215		)
Net cash provided (used) by operating activities	483,077			(105,548		)	384,314
Investing Activities:
Loans to ATSI Comm. Inc.	(200,000		)	—			—
Settlement with ATSI Comm. Inc.	200,000			—			—
Purchase of property and equipment	(87,822		)	(73,027		)	(42,250		)
Net cash used in investing activities	(87,822		)	(73,027		)	(42,250		)
Financing Activities:
Issuance of common stock	22,138			1,716			3,756
Borrowings under notes payable	—			100,000			—
Principal payments on notes payable	—			—			(100,000		)
Principal payments on capital lease obligations	(71,321		)	(61,317		)	(15,294		)
Net cash provided (used) in financing activities	(49,183		)	40,399			(111,538		)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	346,072			(138,176		)	230,526
Cash at beginning of period	134,537			480,609			342,433
Cash at end of period	$	480,609		$	342,433		$	572,959
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the year for:
Interest	$	8,973		$	4,852		$	1,651
Income taxes paid	$	21,121		$	1,400		$	1,489

See accompanying notes.

GlobalSCAPE, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2003 and 2004

1. Significant Accounting Policies

Corporate Structure

All of the Company’s operations are conducted by GlobalSCAPE Texas, LP, a Texas limited partnership. The partners of GlobalSCAPE Texas, LP are two Nevada limited liability companies, which are both wholly owned subsidiaries of GlobalSCAPE, Inc., a Delaware corporation. GlobalSCAPE, Inc. was approximately 70% owned by the Brown and Mann-GlobalSCAPE Joint Venture, with the remainder held publicly. In October 2004, the Brown and Mann-GlobalSCAPE Joint Venture began distribution of its GlobalSCAPE stock to its two partners in their respective percentages. At December 31, 2004 the partnership held 17,586 shares. GlobalSCAPE, Inc. is a holding company and conducts no operations. The stock of GlobalSCAPE, Inc. is quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board. References to “GlobalSCAPE” or the “Company” refer collectively to all of these entities unless otherwise indicated.

Nature of Business

GlobalSCAPE, founded in April 1996, develops and distributes Internet related software. The Company is best known for its popular file transfer program, CuteFTP. The Company derives its revenues primarily from sales of licenses to use its software products. Sales of CuteFTP and CuteFTP Pro accounted for 75% and 69% of total revenues in 2003 and 2004, respectively. The Company is organized and operates as one operating segment, the provision of Internet-based software, and markets its products primarily over the Internet. Secure Server accounted for approximately 14% of total revenues in 2004, increasing from 7% of total revenues in 2003.

Basis of Presentation

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the Unites States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include all subsidiaries. All inter-company transactions and balances have been eliminated.

Liquidity

The Company incurred significant operating losses during 2001, 2002 and 2003 and continued, in January, February and March of 2004, to incur significant operating losses. In February 2004 GlobalSCAPE reduced its workforce by 20%, laying off 9 of the 45 people then employed by the Company.

The Company is highly dependent on the sale of two software products, CuteFTP and CuteFTP Pro, which are subject to technological and competitive obsolescence. Sales from these two products, which represented 69% of the Company’s revenues in 2004, declined 7% from the previous year. This decline was primarily in sales of CuteFTP, which declined 36%. Sales of CuteFTP Pro increased 41% year over year and sales of Secure Server, the companion product to CuteFTP Pro, increased 106%. Secure Server accounted for approximately 14% of total revenues. Substantially all software products ultimately reach a point in their lifecycle in which sales can be expected to plateau or decline. While it cannot be determined with certainty, these products may have reached such a point their lifecycles. Management believes that the market for stand-alone FTP clients for home consumers may be declining. However, we

have not seen the same decline in the market for secure FTP clients and servers such as CuteFTP Pro and Secure Server which we believe better target the needs of businesses.

The Company’s liquidity could be reduced in 2005 if sales of CuteFTP continue to decline and the Company is unable to successfully introduce new products or increase sales of existing products.

If sales continue to decline or the Company’s liquidity otherwise requires, management has the intent and ability to reduce personnel and personnel-related costs, reduce or substantially eliminate capital expenditures and/or reduce or substantially eliminate research and development expenditures.

In addition, the Company could draw on its $250,000 line of credit, if necessary. This line of credit, which matured in December 2004, has been renewed through March 2006. The interest rate is subject to change and is indexed to the bank’s prime rate. The rate was 7.25% at December 31, 2004. In connection with the line of credit, GlobalSCAPE entered into a commercial security agreement with the bank whereby GlobalSCAPE granted a security interest in all its accounts receivable and property and equipment. The Company borrowed $100,000 on September 11, 2003 under this agreement. This amount remained outstanding as of December 31, 2003 but was repaid in February 2004. The credit facility is available to the Company at any point during its term.

The Company’s flexibility in reacting to changes in the operating environment and to changing economic conditions may be limited by the Company’s liquidity position. However, management believes that, if required, it will be able to effect some or all of the components of the plan set forth above, which are sufficient in the aggregate to enable the Company to continue as a going concern through at least December 31, 2005. Accordingly, the financial statements of the Company do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects or the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that may result if the Company cannot continue to operate as a going concern.

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Statement of Position (“SOP”) 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, as modified by SOP 98-9, Modification of SOP 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, With Respect to Certain Transactions.

The Company also sells technical support and maintenance agreements (post contract customer support “PCS”), which are sometimes bundled with the software. When vendor specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) of fair value exists for all elements in a multiple element arrangement, revenue is allocated to each element based on the relative fair value of each of the elements. VSOE of fair value is established by the price charged when the same element is sold separately. In a multiple element arrangement whereby VSOE of fair value of all undelivered elements exists but VSOE of fair value does not exist for one or more delivered elements, revenue is recognized using the residual method. Under the residual method, the fair value of the undelivered elements is deferred and the remaining portion of the arrangement fee is recognized as revenue, assuming collection is probable. Revenue allocated to PCS is recognized ratably over the contractual term, typically one year.

The Company began selling technical support and maintenance services for some of its software products in 2001. In 2004, sales of enterprise class products resulted in higher maintenance and support agreements sold to customers and as a result deferred revenue at December 31, 2004 was $178,117.

The outbound shipping charges charged to the customer are included in software product revenues and amounted to $57,000, $58,000 and $38,000 in 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively. The costs associated with these shipping charges are included in the software products cost of revenue.

Royalty Costs

Royalties that the Company pays on software products licensed from third parties, which it resells, are expensed as a cost of sales when the software product is sold or earlier if the recoverability of any prepaid royalties is in doubt. The Company has distribution agreements with Hannon Hill Corp., Trellix Corp., Perseus Development Corp., Beehive Software, Inc., Visicom Media, Inc., and Turillion Software Technologies. The GlobalSCAPE software products associated with each of the companies are PureCMS, CuteSITE Builder, Web Survey, Mac FTP, CuteHTML Pro and Protect IIS, respectively. GlobalSCAPE no longer distributes the Protect IIS product and expensed prepaid royalties of approximately $15,000 in December 2003. GlobalSCAPE’s agreement with Hannon Hill Corp. required a minimum royalty of $16,667 per month, as prepayment of royalties, for 12 months beginning in December 2002. These payments were expensed as paid because the lower than expected sales of PureCMS raised doubt as to the realization of benefit from these prepayments. The total amount expensed in 2003 relating to these prepayments was $183,337. The Company accrued approximately $36,500, $36,000, and $11,000 in royalty expense in 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively.

Concentrations of Credit Risk and Significant Customers

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash and cash equivalents, and accounts receivable. Cash is deposited in demand accounts in federally insured domestic institutions to minimize risk. The Company provides credit, in the normal course of business, to a number of companies and performs ongoing evaluations of its credit risk. The Company requires no collateral from its customers. Management estimates the allowance for uncollectible accounts based on their historical experience and credit evaluation. No single customer accounted for more than 2% of revenues in 2002, 2003 or 2004.

Cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, employee advances, accounts payable, accrued expenses and notes payable, related party are reflected in the accompanying financial statements at cost, which approximates fair value because of the short term maturity of these instruments.

Other Concentrations

Sales in Foreign Markets. In 2002, 2003 and 2004, approximately 38%, 35% and 36%, respectively, of the Company’s revenues were generated from sales to customers who provided addresses in foreign countries. However, all revenues are received in U.S. dollars so there is no exchange rate risk with respect to the sale of our products. These sales were concentrated mostly in Western Europe, Canada, and Australia. In 2002, 2003 and 2004, the UK accounted for approximately 11.4%, 11.1% and 10.9%, respectively, of total revenues.

Labor. GlobalSCAPE utilizes offshore developers for a large portion of the coding phase of software development. If GlobalSCAPE were unable to continue using these developers because of political or economic instability, GlobalSCAPE may have difficulty finding comparably skilled developers or may have to pay considerably more for the same work, which would have a material adverse impact on results of operations.

Advertising Costs

The Company expenses advertising costs as incurred. Advertising expenses charged to operations for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 were approximately $300,000, $542,000 and $205,000, respectively, and are included in selling, general and administrative expenses. The advertising expenses in 2002 and 2003 relate primarily to the PureCMS product launch. In 2004, the Company incurred advertising cost principally for the purchase of keywords for internet searches, a direct mail campaign for EFT and advertising in various publications.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes using the liability method in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. The liability method provides that the deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded based on the difference between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amount for financial reporting purposes, as measured by the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are carried on the balance sheet with the presumption that they will be realizable in future periods when pre-tax income is generated. Predicting the ability to realize these assets in future periods requires a great deal of judgment by management. Although GlobalSCAPE has generated pre-tax income in previous years and in 2004, pre-tax losses occurred in 2001, 2002 and 2003. It is our judgment that we cannot predict with reasonable certainty that the tax assets resulting from these losses will be fully realized in future periods. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 109 requires a valuation allowance to reduce the deferred tax assets reported if, based on the weight of the evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. After consideration of all of the evidence, both positive and negative, management determined that a $484,350 valuation allowance at December 31, 2004 was necessary to reduce the deferred tax assets to the amount that will more likely than not be realized. The change in the valuation allowance for the current year is a net decrease of $55,497. At December 31, 2004, the Company has available net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $1,249,000, which expire beginning in the year 2020.

Research and Development

Research and development expenses include all direct costs, primarily salaries for personnel and expenditures with external development sources, related to the development of new products and significant enhancements to existing products and are expensed as incurred until such time as technological feasibility is achieved. For the years 2002, 2003 and 2004, we spent approximately $848,000, $945,000 and $728,000, respectively, on research and development. Typically technological feasibility is achieved very late in the development cycle and as such no research and development expenses were capitalized in 2002, 2003 or 2004 and all previously capitalized research and development expenses were fully amortized at December 31, 2002.

Stock-Based Compensation

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (SFAS 123), encourages, but does not require, companies to record compensation cost for stock-based employee compensation plans based on the fair market value of options granted. The Company chose to account for stock based compensation using the intrinsic value method prescribed in APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations. Accordingly, compensation expense is recorded to the extent that the current market price of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price. On December 31, 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard 148, Accounting for Stock Based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure (SFAS 148), which amends SFAS 123. SFAS 148 requires more prominent and frequent disclosures about the effects of stock-based compensation. The Company has continued to account for its stock-based compensation using the intrinsic value method according to the provisions of APB Opinion No. 25.

Pro forma information regarding net income and earnings per share is required by Statement 148, which also requires that the information be determined as if the Company had accounted for its stock options granted subsequent to December 31, 1994 under the fair value method of that Statement. The fair value of these options was estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model.

For purposes of pro forma disclosures, the estimated fair value of the options at the grant date is amortized to expense over the options’ estimated vesting period. The Company’s pro forma information for 2002, 2003 and 2004 follows:

	Years ended December 31,
	2002			2003			2004
Net income (loss), as reported	$	(613,375	)	$	(643,001	)	$	200,423
Stock based compensation included in the determination of net income (loss) as reported, net of related tax effects	(59,396		)	—			—
Stock-based compensation expense that would have been included in the determination of net income (loss) had the fair value based method been applied to all awards, net of related tax effects	(103,923		)	(48,057		)	(19,639		)
Pro forma net income (loss)	$	(776,694	)	$	(691,058	)	$	180,784

Earnings (loss) per share:
Basic- as reported	$	(0.05	)	$	(0.05	)	$	0.01
Basic- pro forma	$	(0.06	)	$	(0.05	)	$	0.00

Diluted- as reported	$	(0.05	)	$	(0.05	)	$	0.01
Diluted- pro forma	$	(0.06	)	$	(0.05	)	$	0.00

The weighted average fair value of the individual stock options granted during 2002, 2003, and 2004 is estimated at $0.13, $0.20 and $0.15, respectively, on the date of grant. The fair values were determined using a minimum value options-pricing model with the following assumptions:

	2002		2003		2004
Dividend yield	None		None		None

Expected volatility	2.45		2.23		1.64

Risk-free interest rate	1.82	%	3.21	%	4.24	%

Expected life	5.0		5.0		5.0

Cash

Cash includes all cash and highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment is comprised of furniture and fixtures, software, computer equipment and leasehold improvements which are recorded at cost and depreciated using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred. Property and equipment acquired under capital leases are depreciated over their useful lives or the respective lease term, if shorter. Depreciation periods used for property and equipment range from three to five years.

Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the shorter of the lease term or the estimated useful life of the asset.

Earnings Per Common Share

Basic and diluted net income per common share is presented in conformity with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, Earnings Per Share (SFAS 128) for all periods presented. Basic earnings per share is based on the weighted effect of all common shares issued and outstanding, and is calculated by dividing net income (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted average shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares used in the basic earnings per share calculation plus the number of common shares that would be issued assuming conversion of all potentially dilutive common shares outstanding. Below is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of basic and diluted earnings per share for each of the following years:

	Year ended December 31,
	2002 (1)			2003 (2)			2004 (3)
Numerators

Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per share:

Net income (loss)	$	(613,375	)	$	(643,001	)	$	200,423

Denominators

Denominators for basic earnings per share:

Weighed average shares outstanding-Basic	13,279,263			13,361,706			13,668,800

Dilutive potential common shares:

Stock Options	—			—			593,996

Denominator for dilutive earnings per share	13,279,263			13,361,706			14,262,796

Net income (loss) per common share	$	(0.05	)	$	(0.05	)	$	0.01

Net income (loss) per commons share – assuming dilution	$	(0.05	)	$	(0.05	)	$	0.01

(1) For the year ended December 31, 2002, 2,965,671 options have not been included in dilutive shares as the effect would be anti-dilutive.

(2) For the year ended December 31, 2003, 1,856,171 options have not been included in dilutive shares as the effect would be anti-dilutive.

(3) For the year ended December 31, 2004, 882,000 options have not been included in dilutive shares as the effect would be anti-dilutive.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Variable Interest Entities

On January 1, 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (“FIN 46”). FIN 46 addresses consolidation of business enterprises of variable interest entities. FIN 46 is effective immediately for all variable interest entities created after January 31, 2003 and for the first fiscal year or interim period ending after December 15, 2003 for variable interest entities in which an enterprise holds a variable interest that it acquired before February 1, 2003. The Company has no variable interest entities, therefore, adoption of this statement did not impact the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

Stock Options

In December 2004, FASB issued Statement No. 123-R, Share-Based Payment, which establishes accounting standards for transactions in which an entity receives employee services in exchange for (a) equity instruments of the entity or (b) liabilities that are based on the fair value of the entity’s equity instruments or that may be settled by the issuance of equity instruments. Effective in the third quarter of 2005, SFAS 123-R will require us to recognize the grant-date fair value of stock options and equity based compensation issued to employees in the statement of operations. The statement also requires that such transactions be accounted for using the fair –value-based method, thereby eliminating use of the intrinsic value method of accounting in APB No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, which was permitted under Statement 123, as originally issued. We currently are evaluating the impact of Statement 123-R on our financial condition and results of operations.

2. Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable, which are primarily from sales of software licenses, are presented net of an allowance for doubtful accounts. The activity of the Company’s allowance for doubtful accounts for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 is presented in the following table:

Balance at			Charged to						Balance at
Year Ended	Beginning		Income or						End of
December 31	of Period		Expense			Deductions (1)			Period

2002	$	25,104	$	102,261		$	(68,938	)	$	58,427
2003	58,427		14,508			(29,354		)	43,581
2004	43,581		(17,087		)	(16,299		)	10,195

(1) Represents amounts written off as uncollectible accounts receivable.

3. Debt

The Company has obtained a $250,000 revolving line of credit agreement with a commercial bank. The line of credit expired in December 2004, when it was renewed and extended through March 2006. The line is due on demand, but if no demand then in March 2006. The interest rate is subject to change and is indexed to the bank’s prime rate. The rate at December 31, 2004 was 7.25%. In connection with the line of credit, GlobalSCAPE entered into a Commercial Security Agreement with the bank whereby GlobalSCAPE granted a security interest in all its accounts receivable and property and equipment. The Company borrowed $100,000 on September 11, 2003 under this agreement. This amount remained outstanding as of December 31, 2003 and was repaid in February 2004.

4. Commitments and Contingencies

Capital Leases

The Company had financed the acquisition of certain fixed assets through capital lease obligations. These obligations were paid in full in 2004. As of December 31, 2004 GlobalSCAPE had no capital lease obligations.

Property and equipment at December 31, 2003 and 2004 includes $227,000 for assets held under capital leases, less associated accumulated depreciation of $203,000 and $227,000, respectively. Depreciation for assets held under capital leases is included in depreciation and amortization expense.

Operating Leases

Minimum future lease payments on non-cancelable operating leases for office facilities are as follows for the years ending December 31:

2005	190,659
2006	190,659
2007	190,659
Thereafter	95,329
	$	667,306

This lease provides the Company with two successive 5-year renewal options. Operating lease expense amounted to approximately $180,000 in each of 2002, 2003 and 2004.

Contingencies

The Company from time to time may be involved in litigation relating to claims arising out of its ordinary course of business. There are no pending claims against the Company that would have a material adverse effect on the financial statements of the Company.

5. Related Party Transactions

On June 11, 2002, ATSI sold its majority interest in GlobalSCAPE, Inc. to Brown and Mann-GlobalSCAPE Joint Venture, a Texas general partnership owned by San Antonio-based investors Thomas W. Brown and David L. Mann. Contemporaneously with this transaction, GlobalSCAPE agreed to compromise and settle a $612,304 inter-company balance owed to it by ATSI, which resulted in charges to GlobalSCAPE of $392,905. The balance was settled for (i) $200,000 in cash from ATSI; (ii) NTFC Capital Corporation’s release of GlobalSCAPE as a co-borrower on a capital lease executed by ATSI in 1999, and (iii) ATSI’s agreement to provide $50,000 worth of transition support services to GlobalSCAPE over the nine months ending March 11, 2003, including payroll administration and GlobalSCAPE’s continued use of a shared accounting platform. However, the Company completed its transition from ATSI’s payroll and accounting systems during the third quarter of 2002 and expensed the remainder of the support services, approximately $46,000, during the third quarter of 2002. In addition, prepaid insurance coverage under a joint policy with ATSI was lost to GlobalSCAPE as a result of the change in control, resulting in a charge against GlobalSCAPE’s prepaid assets of $27,083 during the second quarter of 2002.

During the period from January 1, 2002 to June 11, 2002, ATSI incurred various expenses for the joint benefit of ATSI and GlobalSCAPE such as premiums for health and general business insurance. ATSI allocated a portion of these expenses to GlobalSCAPE based on GlobalSCAPE’s proportionate use of the services. The amounts allocated to GlobalSCAPE were not necessarily indicative of the amounts that would have been incurred if GlobalSCAPE had acquired these services on its own, nor of the amounts that will be charged in the future. However, management believes the method of allocation was reasonable. Expenses for these services in the amount of $40,131 for the period beginning January 1, 2002 and ending June 11, 2002 were charged to GlobalSCAPE by ATSI and are reflected in the statement of operations. Also during 2002, the Company made various loans to ATSI with interest of 12% per annum.

On June 21, 2002, GlobalSCAPE, Inc. announced the termination of its CEO, Tim Nicolaou. Mr. Nicolaou resigned from the Board of Directors and received $190,000 in severance payments as provided by his employment agreement and continued to receive health benefits paid by the Company for a period not to exceed twelve months, the cost of which was expensed in 2002.

On March 30, 2004, the Company obtained a $200,000 line of credit with the Brown and Mann-GlobalSCAPE Joint Venture. The line of credit was available after June 21, 2004 if the Company failed to extend a line of credit with a bank and matured on December 31, 2004. The line of credit with the partnership was not renewed. The interest rate was subject to change and was indexed to the prime rate published in the Wall Street Journal. In connection with the line of credit, GlobalSCAPE entered into a

Commercial Security Agreement with the Brown and Mann-GlobalSCAPE Joint Venture whereby GlobalSCAPE granted a security interest in all its accounts receivable and property and equipment. The Brown and Mann-GlobalSCAPE Joint Venture is 70% owned by Thomas W. Brown and 30% owned by David L. Mann, both of whom are members of GlobalSCAPE’s Board of Directors. In October 2004 the Brown and Mann-GlobalSCAPE Joint Venture distributed all shares held by the partnership to its two partners with the exception of 17,856 shares.

6. Income Taxes

Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities are related to the following:

	2003		2004
Total deferred tax liabilities	$	—	$	—

Deferred tax assets:
Accrued expenses	29,292		—
Allowance for doubtful accounts	15,428		3,466
Deferred revenue	47,766		—
Depreciation and amortization	17,305		56,696
Net operating loss carryforwards	430,559		424,691
Total deferred tax assets	540,350		484,853
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets	540,350		484,853
Net deferred tax assets	$	—	$	—

A reconciliation of income tax expense and the amount computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate (34%) to income before income taxes is as follows:

	2002			2003			2004
Taxes computed at federal statutory rate	$	(148,986	)	$	(218,620	)	$	68,655
Increases (decreases) in taxes resulting from:
State taxes, net of federal benefit	18,658			924			983
Non-deductible incentive stock option compensation charges	(21,215		)	—			—
Other non-deductible expenses	2,800			2,581			2,368
Change in valuation allowance	323,835			216,515			(55,497		)
Other	110			—			(15,020		)
Total	$	175,202		$	1,400		$	1,489

At December 31, 2004, the Company has available net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $1,249,000, which expire beginning in the year 2020.

7. Employee Benefit Plan

The Company has a 401(k) plan that covers substantially all employees with at least six months of service. Under the plan, employees may elect to contribute a percentage of their annual salary subject to the Internal Revenue Code maximum limitations. The plan provides for employer matching and discretionary contributions, the amounts of which are to be determined annually by the Board of Directors. The Company made contributions to the plan of $7,347, $7,533 and $6,910 for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively.

8. Stock Options and Stock Based Compensation

In January 1998, the Company approved the 1998 Stock Option Plan (the “1998 Plan”) for officers, other employees, directors, and consultants of the Company. Under the terms of the 1998 Plan, up to 728,571 shares of the Company’s common stock may be granted in the form of incentive stock options or non-qualified stock options, awarded, or sold to officers, other employees, directors and consultants. As of July 31, 2001, no additional grants could be issued under the 1998 Plan.

In May 2000, the Board of Directors approved the 2000 stock option plan (the “2000 Plan”) for key employees, non-employee directors, and advisors of the Company. Under the terms of the 2000 Plan, up to 3,660,000 shares of the Company’s common stock may be granted in the form of incentive stock options or non-qualified stock options. The maximum aggregate number of shares of common stock that may be granted to any optionee during the term of the 2000 Plan may not exceed 2,000,000. The 2000 Plan provides that the purchase price per share for incentive stock options and non-qualified stock options shall not be less than the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant. The maximum term for an option granted is ten years from the date of grant.

The Company has adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, “Accounting for Stock Based Compensation” (SFAS No. 123), and elected to use the intrinsic value method in accounting for its stock option plan in accordance with Accounting Principles Board opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” and related interpretations under which compensation expense is recorded to the extent that the current market price of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price. No options were issued below fair value for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2004.

During the second, third and fourth quarters of 2004, 261,000, 105,000 and 215,000 options were granted to various employees at an average exercise price of $0.15 per share.

Supplemental Disclosures for Stock Options

The following table shows the number of options granted, cancelled and exercised for all option plans for the three years ending December 31, 2004.

	Number of	Weighted Avg.
	Shares	Exercise Price
2002
Outstanding December 31, 2001	3,557,480	$	0.41
Granted	24,000	0.13
Expired	289,380	0.79
Exercised	326,429	0.07
Outstanding December 31, 2002	2,965,671	0.40

2003
Granted	56,000	0.20
Expired	1,035,500	0.72
Exercised	130,000	0.0132
Outstanding December 31, 2003	1,856,171	0.2454

2004
Granted	581,000	0.15
Expired	182,500	0.28
Exercised	284,600	0.0132
Outstanding December 31, 2004	1,970,071	$	0.2474

The following table shows information about outstanding stock options at December 31, 2004.

		Options Outstanding				Options Exercisable
Range of Exercise Prices	Options Outstanding		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life	Weighted Average Exercise Price			Number of Options	Weighted Average Exercise Price
$ 0.0132	565,571		5.89	$	0.0132		565,571	$	0.0132
$ 0.12 - $0.20	548,500		9.59	0.151			8,580	0.200
$ 0.464	856,000		6.29	0.464			856,000	0.464
$ 0.0132 - $0.464	1,970,071		7.09	$	0.2474		1,430,151	$	0.2841

9. Quarterly Financial Information (unaudited)

	Fiscal Year 2003
	1st Quarter				2nd Quarter		3rd Quarter		4th Quarter

Total revenues	$		1,120,186		$	1,309,708	$	1,336,682	$	1,080,543
Total operating expenses	1,727,968				1,207,219		1,251,682		1,295,349
Net income (loss) before provision for income taxes	(610,416			)	101,582		83,984		(216,751		)
Net income (loss)	(610,416			)	101,582		82,584		(216,751		)

Net income (loss) per share:
Basic	$	(0.05		)	$	0.01	$	0.01	$	(0.02	)
Diluted	$	(0.05		)	$	0.01	$	0.01	$	(0.02	)
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic	13,358,619				13,358,619		13,358,619		13,370,902
Diluted	13,358,619				14,284,107		14,275,292		13,370,902

	Fiscal Year 2004
	1st Quarter			2nd Quarter		3rd Quarter		4th Quarter

Total revenues	$	1,172,137		$	1,287,797	$	1,270,223	$	1,200,502
Total operating expenses	1,377,737			1,083,595		1,135,252		1,133,651
Net income (loss) before provision for income taxes	(205,600		)	204,202		134,971		66,851
Net income (loss)	(205,600		)	204,202		134,971		66,851

Net income (loss) per share:
Basic	$	(0.02	)	$	0.01	$	0.01	$	0.00
Diluted	$	(0.02	)	$	0.01	$	0.01	$	0.00
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic	13,488,619			13,638,995		13,773,219		13,773,219
Diluted	13,488,619			14,154,174		14,303,786		14,367,215

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedule, and Reports on Form 8-K

(a)(1) Financial Statements and Schedules

The following financial statements of GlobalSCAPE, Inc. are included in Item 8:

• ; Consolidated balance sheets - December 31, 2003 and 2004

• Consolidated statements of operations - Years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004

• Consolidated statements of stockholders’ equity - Years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004

• Consolidated statements of cash flows - Years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004

• Notes to consolidated financial statements - Decemb er 31, 2004

(2) Schedules not listed above have been omitted because they are not applicable or required, or the information required to be set forth therein is included in the Financial Statements or Notes thereto.

(3) Exhibits

Exhibit Number		Description
3.1		Certificate of Incorporation of the Company dated April 17, 1996 (Filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Form 10 filed May 12, 2000).
3.2		Certificate of Renewal and Revival of Certificate of Incorporation for the Company dated February 16, 1999 (Filed as Exhibit 3.2 to Form 10 filed May 12, 2000).
3.3		Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation dated May 11, 2000 (Filed as Exhibit 3.3 to Form 10 filed May 12, 2000).
3.4		Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation dated September 5, 2000 (Filed as Exhibit 3.5 to Form 10, Amendment No. 2, filed September 12, 2000)
3.5		Bylaws of the Company (Filed as Exhibit 3.4 to Form 10 filed May 12, 2000).
3.6		Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company effective as of September 1, 2000 (Filed as Exhibit 3.6 to Form 10, Amendment No. 2, filed September 12 2000).
3.7		Amended and Restated Bylaws of GlobalSCAPE effective as of October 10, 2000 (Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed October 10, 2000).
3.8		Amended and Restated Bylaws of GlobalSCAPE effective as of January 30, 2003 (Filed as Exhibit 3.8 to Annual Report on Form 10-K filed March 31, 2003).
4.1		Specimen of Stock Certificate (Filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K filed April 2, 2001).
*10.1		1998 Stock Option Plan as amended May 13, 1999 (Filed as Exhibit 4.2 to Form 10 filed May 12, 2000).
*10.2		2000 Stock Option Plan dated May 8, 2000 (Filed as Exhibit 4.3 to Form 10 filed May 12, 2000).
*10.3		Form of 1998 Stock Option Plan Rights Termination Letter Agreement of Directors to Agree Not to Claim Any Right of Adjustment dated February 4, 2000 (Filed as Exhibit 4.6 to Form 10 filed May 12, 2000).
*10.4		Form of 1998 Stock Option Plan Rights Termination Letter Agreement for Employees and Consultants to Cancel Options dated February 8, 2000 (Filed as Exhibit 4.7 to Form 10, filed May 12, 2000).
*10.5		Form of 1998 Stock Option Plan Rights Termination Letter of Officer to Agree Not to Claim Any Right of Adjustment dated February 8, 2000 (Filed as Exhibit 4.8 to Form 10 filed May 12, 2000).

*10.6		Form of 1998 Stock Option Plan Rights Termination Letter Agreement of Officer to Agree Not to Exercise Options dated February 8, 2000 (Filed as Exhibit 4.9 to Form 10 filed May 12, 2000).
*10.7		Form of 1998 Stock Option Plan Reinstatement and Adjustment Letter for Employees dated December 19, 2000 (Filed as Exhibit 10.17 to Annual Report on Form 10-K filed April 2, 2001).
*10.8		Form of Release and Indemnity Agreement between GlobalSCAPE, Inc. and Employees dated December 19, 2000 (Filed as Exhibit 10.18 to Annual Report on Form 10-K filed April 2, 2001).
10.9		Commercial Lease Agreement between ACLP University Park S.A. II, L.P. and the Company dated April 13, 1999 (Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10 filed May 12, 2000).
*10.10		Release and Indemnity Agreement between GlobalSCAPE, Inc. and Sandra Poole-Christal dated April 2, 2001 (Filed as Exhibit 10.17 to Annual Report on Form 10-K filed April 1, 2002).
*10.11		Granting letter for 808,571 options to Sandra Poole-Christal under GlobalSCAPE, Inc. 1998 Stock Option Plan dated April 20, 2001 (Filed as Exhibit 10.18 to Annual Report on Form 10-K filed April 1, 2002).
*10.12		Bonus letter for Sandra Poole-Christal in connection with grant of 808,571 options under 1998 Stock Option Plan (Filed as Exhibit 10.19 to Annual Report on Form 10-K filed April 1, 2002).
*10.13		Incentive Stock Option Agreement between GlobalSCAPE, Inc. and Sandra Poole Christal dated April 20, 2001 (Filed as Exhibit 10.20 to Annual Report on Form 10-K filed April 1, 2002).
*10.14		Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement under GlobalSCAPE, Inc. 2000 Stock Option Plan (Filed as Exhibit 10.21 to Annual Report on Form 10-K filed April 1, 2002).
21		Subsidiaries (filed herewith).
23.1		Consent of Helin, Donovan, Trubee & Wilkinson, LLP (filed herewith).
23.2		Consent of Ernst & Young LLP (filed herewith)
31.1		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d - 14(a) Certification of Charles R. Poole, President and Chief Operating Officer of GlobalSCAPE, Inc. (filed herewith).
31.2		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d - 14(a) Certification of Thomas F. Farar, Chief Financial Officer (filed herewith).
32.1		Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (filed herewith).

* Management Compensatory Plan or Agreement

Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in San Antonio, Texas on March 24, 2005.

GlobalSCAPE, Inc.


			By:	/s/ Charles R. Poole
			Charles R. Poole
	President and Chief Operating Officer


			By:	/s/ Thomas F. Farar
			Thomas F. Farar
		Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant in the capacities indicated on March 24, 2005.

Signature						Title

/s/ Charles R. Poole						President, COO and Director
Charles R. Poole						(Principal Executive Officer)

/s/ Thomas W. Brown						Chairman of the Board and Director
Thomas W. Brown

/s/ David L. Mann						Director
David L. Mann

/s/ Thomas F. Farar						Chief Financial Officer,
Thomas F. Farar						Treasurer, Secretary
						(Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)

PART I

Item 1.	Business

Item 2.	Properties

Item 3.	Legal Proceedings

Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

Item 4A.	Executive Officers of the Company

PART II

Item 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity

Item 6.	Selected Financial Data

Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation

Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures

Item 9B.	Other Information

PART III

Item 10.	Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant

Item 11.	Executive Compensation

Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

Item 14.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services

PART IV

Item 15.	Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedule

Signatures and Certifications

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm - Helin, Donovan, Trubee & Wilkinson, LLP
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm - Ernst & Young, LLP
Financial Statements
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

FORM 10-K

None

Preliminary Notes

Forward-Looking Statements

Company Overview

Products

History and Recent Developments

Industry Background

Strategy

Seasonality

Network and Equipment

Research and Development

Competition

Intellectual Property

Employees

Risk Factors

Risks Related to Stock Ownership

Risks Related to Legal Uncertainty

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Critical Accounting Policies

Use of Estimates

Income Taxes

Comparison of Year Ended December 31, 2004 to Year Ended December 31, 2003

Comparison of Year Ended December 31, 2003 to Year Ended December 31, 2002

Inflation

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

GlobalSCAPE, Inc.

December 31, 2003 and 2004

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedule, and Reports on Form 8-K