UNITED STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
|
ý |
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004 |
|
|
OR |
|
o |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
for the transition period from to |
|
Commission file number 814-00237 |
|
GLADSTONE CAPITAL CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
Maryland |
|
54-2040781 |
|
(State or other jurisdiction of |
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
|
|
|
|
|
1616 Anderson Road, Suite 208 |
|
22102 |
|
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
|
|
|
|
|
(703) 286-7000 |
||
|
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) |
||
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES ý NO o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
YES ý NO o
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant on March 31, 2004, based on the closing price on that date of $22.41 on the Nasdaq National Market, was $209,638,939. For the purposes of calculating this amount only, all directors and executive officers of the Registrant have been treated as affiliates.
There were 11,278,510 shares of the Registrant’s Common Stock, $0.001 par value, outstanding as of December 2, 2004.
Documents Incorporated by Reference. Portions of the Registrant’s Proxy Statement relating to the Registrant’s 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Report.
GLADSTONE CAPITAL CORPORATION
FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 2004
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Item 1. Business
Gladstone Capital Corporation is a specialty finance company that was incorporated under the General Corporation Laws of the State of Maryland on May 30, 2001 and that commenced its initial public offering on August 24, 2001. We seek to achieve a high level of current income by investing in debt securities, consisting primarily of senior notes, senior subordinated notes and junior subordinated notes, of established private businesses that are backed by leveraged buyout funds, venture capital funds or others. We also seek to provide our stockholders with long-term capital growth through the appreciation in the value of warrants or other equity instruments that we may receive when we make loans. Our headquarters are in McLean, Virginia, a suburb of Washington, DC and we have offices in New York, New York, Chicago, Illinois, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, and Morristown, New Jersey. We have elected to be treated as a business development company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”).
David Gladstone, our chairman and chief executive officer, has over 25 years of experience in making loans to, and investing in, small and medium-sized companies at Gladstone Capital Corporation, Allied Capital Corporation and American Capital Strategies Ltd. Allied Capital Corporation is a publicly traded subordinated debt lender and American Capital Strategies is a publicly traded buyout and subordinated debt lender. Mr. Gladstone is no longer affiliated with Allied Capital Corporation or American Capital Strategies Ltd.
Terry Lee Brubaker, our vice chairman and chief operating officer, has over 25 years of experience in acquisitions and managing companies subsequent to an acquisition. Prior to joining Gladstone Capital Corporation, he was a member of the management team that designed and implemented the acquisition strategy of James River Corporation.
George Stelljes III, our president and chief investment officer has an extensive background in subordinated debt and buyouts and currently oversees the structuring and arranging of financing for potential investments in small and medium-sized businesses.
Our chief financial officer, Harry Brill, brings significant experience from his role as the chief accounting officer of Allied Capital where he was responsible for the public filings of a family of five public companies and oversaw the preparation of the operating reports and financial statements of these companies and of three private funds.
We typically make loans to companies that are substantially owned by leveraged buyout funds, venture capital funds, or family owned businesses. Messrs. Gladstone, Brubaker and Stelljes have an extensive referral network of venture capitalists, leveraged buyout funds, investment bankers, attorneys, commercial bankers and business and financial brokers. We believe that these entities have been, and will continue to be, an important source of loan opportunities. We intend to enter into additional informal relationships with other leveraged buyout funds and venture capital funds, but we can not assure you that we will be able to do so or that any such relationships will lead to the origination of loans.
Effective October 1, 2004, we are externally managed by our affiliate Gladstone Management Corporation (“Gladstone Management”), a registered investment adviser, pursuant to an investment advisory and administrative agreement.
We have two wholly owned subsidiaries, Gladstone Capital Advisers, Inc., through which we provide managerial assistance to our portfolio companies and Gladstone Business Loan LLC, through which we hold our loan investment portfolio.
STRATEGY
Our strategy is to make loans at favorable interest rates to small and medium-sized businesses that we believe have traditionally been underserved by conventional lenders. We use the loan referral networks of Messrs. Gladstone, Stelljes and Brubaker and of our managing directors to identify and make senior and subordinated loans to selected businesses that we believe do not have sufficient access to traditional sources of lending. We make loans to borrowers that need funds to finance growth, restructure their balance sheets or effect a change of control, all of which we believe are typically underserved by banks and other traditional institutional lenders. We believe that our business strategy will enable us to achieve a high level of current income by investing in debt securities, consisting primarily of senior notes, senior subordinated notes and junior subordinated notes, of established private businesses that are backed by leveraged buyout funds, venture capital funds or others. In addition, from time to time we might acquire existing loans that meet this profile from leveraged buyout funds, venture capital funds and others. We also seek to provide our stockholders with long-term capital growth through the appreciation in the value of warrants or other equity instruments that we might
1
receive when we make loans. Our financial plan presumes that (1) the net capital gains from the sale of the warrants (as well as other profit enhancements) we receive in connection with our lending activities will exceed any losses we may experience from loans that are not repaid, and (2) the managerial assistance fee income we derive from assisting our portfolio companies will provide us with a source of revenue that approximates our operating expenses (excluding interest expense). Effective October 1, 2004, our adviser, Gladstone Management will provide our managerial assistance, receive the managerial assistance fee which will then be credited against the investment advisory fees. We cannot assure you that we will be able to achieve our investment objectives or that our business strategy will be successful.
We believe that we are well-positioned to provide financing to small and medium-sized businesses that are undergoing a change of ownership, including management-led and third party leveraged buyouts, and to those businesses that have good growth characteristics. We are not limited by the capital and other regulatory requirements of the banking and savings and loan industries and we have relatively low overhead and administrative expenses. Moreover, our strategy of accepting warrants to purchase stock of our borrowers and other yield enhancements, such as success fees, is intended to closely align our interests with those of our portfolio companies, thereby reducing transaction costs, conveying our commitment to the borrowers and enhancing our attractiveness as a financing source. Perhaps most importantly, we believe that we have the experience and expertise to satisfy the financing needs of such businesses. In particular, we believe that we may realize a competitive advantage from Mr. Gladstone’s 25 years of experience in financing small to medium-sized private businesses, Mr. Stelljes’ many years of financing medium and small businesses, and Mr. Brubaker’s extensive experience in acquisitions and operations. We believe that our established network of loan referral sources, consisting of relationships established over many years by Messrs. Gladstone, Stelljes, and Brubaker and our managing directors will generate opportunities to identify and make senior and subordinated loans to selected businesses that satisfy our investment criteria. We intend to enter into additional informal relationships with leveraged buyout funds and venture capital funds, but we can not give any assurance that we will be able to do so.
We target small and medium-sized private businesses that meet certain criteria, including the potential for growth, adequate assets for loan collateral, experienced management teams with significant ownership interest in the business, adequate capitalization, profitable operations based on cash flow and potential opportunities for us to realize appreciation and gain liquidity in our various equity positions. We may achieve liquidity in an equity position through a merger or acquisition of the borrower, a public offering of the borrower’s stock or by exercising our right to require the borrower to buy back our warrants, although we cannot assure you that we will always have these rights. We can also achieve a similar effect by requiring the borrower to pay us deferred interest, which we refer to as a success fee, upon the occurence of certain events. If the borrower does well we are paid a success fee in place of having warrants to own common stock. We cannot provide assurance that we will always have a success fee or warrant in place with every investment.
As a business development company, we make available significant managerial assistance to our portfolio companies. Such assistance typically involves reviewing existing credit facilities, arranging bank financing, arranging equity financing, structuring financing from multiple lenders, structuring financing from equity investors, restructuring existing loans, raising equity and debt capital, closely monitoring the operations of the borrower, participating in its board and management meetings, being available for consultation with its officers and providing general organizational and financial guidance.
We typically invest in senior, senior subordinated and junior subordinated notes. Our loans typically range from $5 million to $15 million, mature in no more than seven years and accrue interest at a fixed or variable rate that exceeds the prime rate. A number of our loans have a provision that calls for some portion of the interest payments to be deferred and added to the principal balance so that the interest is paid, together with the principal, at maturity. This form of deferred interest is often called “paid in kind” (or “PIK”) interest, and, when earned, we record PIK income as interest income and add the PIK interest to the principal balance of the loans.
Because our loans generally consist of subordinated debt of private companies who typically cannot or will not expend the resources to have their debt securities rated by a credit rating agency, we expect that most, if not all, of the debt securities we acquire will be unrated. We cannot accurately predict what ratings these loans might receive if they were in fact rated, and therefore we cannot determine whether or not they could be considered to be “investment grade” quality.
To the extent possible, our loans generally are collateralized by a security interest in the borrower’s assets. We do not usually have the first claim on these assets. Interest payments on loans we make will generally be made monthly or quarterly (except to the extent of any PIK interest) with amortization of principal generally being deferred for several years. The principal amount of the loans and any accrued but unpaid interest will generally become due at maturity at five to seven years. We will focus on making loans accompanied by warrants to purchase stock in the borrowers or other yield enhancements, such as success fees. These warrants will typically have an exercise price equal to the fair value of the portfolio company’s common stock at the time of the loan and entitle us to purchase a modest percentage of the borrower’s stock. Success fees are conditional interest that is paid if the borrower is successful. The success fee is calculated as additional interest on the loan and if certain events occur, such as the sale of the borrower, then the success fee is paid. If the event or events do not occur, then the success fee is not paid.
2
From time to time, a portfolio company may request additional financing, providing us with additional lending opportunities. We will consider such requests for additional financing under the criteria we have established for initial investments and we anticipate that any debt securities we acquire in a follow-on financing will have characteristics comparable to those issued in the original financing. In some situations, our failure, inability or decision not to make a follow-on investment may be detrimental to the operations or survival of a portfolio company and thus jeopardize our investment in that borrower.
As noted above, we expect to receive warrants, to purchase stock, or other yield enhancements in many of our borrowers. If a financing is successful, not only will our debt securities have been repaid with interest, but we will be in a position to realize a gain on the accompanying equity interests or other yield enhancements. The opportunity to realize such gain may occur if the borrower is sold to new owners or if it makes a public offering of its stock. In most cases, we will not have the right to require that a borrower undergo an initial public offering by registering securities under the Securities Act of 1933, (“Securities Act”), but we generally will have the right to sell our equity interests in any subsequent public offering by the borrower. Even when we have the right to participate in a borrower’s public offering, the underwriters might insist, particularly if we own a large amount of equity securities, that we retain all or a substantial portion of our shares for a specified period of time. Moreover, we may decide not to sell an equity position even when we have the right and the opportunity to do so. Thus, although we expect to dispose of an equity interest after a certain time, situations may arise in which we hold equity securities for a longer period.
In certain cases, we may receive the right, to which we refer as a put right, to require the borrower to repurchase the warrants or other yield enhancements from us. When no public offering is available, we may exercise our put rights to dispose of our equity interest in the borrower, although our ability to exercise put rights may be limited or nonexistent if a business does not have the money to repurchase our warrants or other yield enhancements. Similarly, we anticipate that we may obtain the right, to which we refer as an unlocking right, to require that the borrower purchase our warrants or stock if it rejects a bona fide third party acquisition offer. The unlocking rights may allow us to sell our equity interests back to the borrower at the price offered by the potential acquirer.
In addition to the put rights and unlocking rights described above, when one of our portfolio companies does go public, we may undertake hedging strategies with regard to our equity interests in it. We may mitigate risks associated with the volatility of publicly traded securities by, for instance, selling securities short or writing or buying call or put options. Hedging against a decline in the value of such investments in public companies would not eliminate fluctuations in the values of such investments or prevent losses if the values of such investments decline, but would establish other investments designed to gain from those same developments. Therefore, by engaging in hedging transactions we can moderate the decline in the value of our hedged investments in public companies. However, such hedging transactions would also limit our opportunity to gain from an increase in the value of our investment in the public company. Pursuant to our line of credit, we have agreed to enter into hedging transactions, such as interest rate cap agreement in connection with the borrowings that we make under the line of credit, and to date we hold one interest rate cap agreement. Furthermore, in the event that we securitize a portion of our loan portfolio in the future, we believe that we will likely be required to enter into similar arrangements with respect to the securitized loans. Hedging strategies do pose risks to us and our stockholders, however we believe that such activities, because they will be limited to only a portion of our portfolio, are manageable.
Section 12(a)(3) of the 1940 Act prohibits us “in contravention of such rules and regulations or orders as [the SEC] may prescribe as necessary or appropriate in the public interest or for the protection of investors . . . to effect a short sale of any security . . . ..” However, to date, the SEC has not promulgated regulations under this statute. It is possible that such regulations could be promulgated in the future in a way that would require us to change any hedging strategies that we may adopt. We will only engage in hedging activities in compliance with applicable law and regulations.
3
SELECTION OF LOAN OPPORTUNITIES
We have identified certain characteristics that we believe are important to profitably lend to small and medium-sized businesses. The criteria listed below provide a general guidepost for our lending and investment decisions, although not all of these criteria may be followed in each instance.
• Growth. In addition to generating sufficient cash flow to service its debt, a potential borrower generally will be required to establish its ability to grow its cash flow. Anticipated growth will be a key factor in determining the value ascribed to any warrants we acquire in connection with our loans.
• Significant sponsor. We seek businesses in which leveraged buyout funds or venture capital funds have invested. We believe that a business in which a substantial equity sponsor has made a meaningful investment is more likely to be a good borrowing candidate.
• Liquidation value of assets. Although we do not generally intend to operate as an asset-based lender, liquidation value of the assets collateralizing our loans is an important factor in each credit decision. Emphasis is placed both on tangible assets (e.g., inventory, plant, property and equipment) and intangible assets (e.g., accounts receivable, customer lists, networks, databases and recurring revenue streams).
• Experienced management team. We will generally require that each borrower have a management team that is experienced and properly incentivized through a significant ownership interest in the borrower. We generally will require that a borrower have, at a minimum, a strong chief executive officer and chief financial officer who have demonstrated the ability to accomplish the borrower’s objectives and implement its business plan.
• Profitable or near-profitable operations. We focus on borrowers that are profitable or near-profitable at the operating level. We do not intend typically to lend to, or invest in, start-up or other early stage companies, nor do we intend typically to lend to, or invest in, businesses that are experiencing significant operating problems.
• Exit strategy. Prior to making a loan for which we receive a warrant to purchase stock of the borrower or other yield enhancement, we will analyze the potential for the borrower to experience a liquidity event that will allow us to realize value for our equity position. Liquidity events include, among other things, an initial public offering, a private sale of our financial interest, a merger or acquisition of the borrower or a purchase of our equity position by the borrower or one of its stockholders.
Loan Origination Process
To originate loans, our lending officers use an extensive referral network comprised of venture capitalists, leveraged buyout funds, investment bankers, attorneys, accountants, commercial bankers and business brokers. We intend to enter into additional informal relationships with leveraged buyout funds and venture capital funds, but we can give no assurance that we will be able to do so.
Approval Process
Our lending professionals review informational packages in search of potential financing opportunities and conduct a due diligence investigation of each applicant that passes an initial screening process. This due diligence investigation generally includes one or more on-site visits, a review of the potential borrower’s historical and projected financial information, interviews with management, employees, customers and vendors of the applicant and background checks and research on the applicant’s product, service or particular industry. Upon completion of the due diligence investigation, our financial professional creates a borrower profile summarizing the prospective borrower’s historical financial statements, industry and management team and analyzing its conformity to our general investment criteria. Our lending professional then presents this profile to our credit committee, which is comprised of Messrs. Gladstone, Brubaker, and Stelljes. Our credit committee must unanimously approve each loan, and each member of our Board of Directors must review each financing.
4
TEMPORARY INVESTMENTS
Pending investment in other types of “qualifying assets,” we invest our otherwise uninvested cash primarily in cash, cash items, government securities or high-quality debt securities maturing in one year or less from the time of investment, to which we refer collectively as temporary investments, so that 70% of our assets are qualifying assets. For information regarding regulations to which we are subject and the definition of “qualifying assets,” see “Regulation.” Typically, we invest in US Treasury bills or in repurchase obligations of a “primary dealer” in government securities, as designated by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, or of any other dealer whose credit has been established to the satisfaction of our Board of Directors. There is no percentage restriction on the proportion of our assets that may be invested in such repurchase agreements. A repurchase agreement involves the purchase by an investor, such as us, of a specified security and the simultaneous agreement by the seller to repurchase it at an agreed-upon future date and at a price which is greater than the purchase price by an amount that reflects an agreed-upon interest rate. Such interest rate is effective for the period of time during which the investor’s money is invested in the arrangement and is related to current market interest rates rather than the coupon rate on the purchased security. Our custodian, or the correspondent in its account with the Federal Reserve/Treasury Book Entry System, will be required to constantly maintain underlying securities in an amount at least equal to the repurchase price. If the seller were to default on its repurchase obligation, we might suffer a loss to the extent that the proceeds from the sale of the underlying security were less than the repurchase price. A seller’s bankruptcy could delay or prevent a sale of the underlying securities. Our Board of Directors has established procedures, which it will review periodically, requiring us to monitor the creditworthiness of the dealers with which we enter into repurchase agreement transactions.
COMPETITION
A large number of entities compete with us and make the types of investments that we seek to make in small and medium-sized privately-owned businesses. Such competitors include private equity funds, leveraged buyout funds, venture capital funds, investment banks and other equity and non-equity based investment funds, and other financing sources, including traditional financial services companies such as commercial banks. Many of our competitors are substantially larger than we are and have considerably greater financial, technical and marketing resources than we do. For example, some competitors may have a lower cost of funds and access to funding sources that are not available to us. In addition, certain of our competitors may have higher risk tolerances or different risk assessments, which could allow them to consider a wider variety of investments, establish more relationships and build their market shares. Furthermore, many of these competitors are not subject to the regulatory restrictions that the 1940 Act imposes on us as a business development company. We cannot assure you that the competitive pressures we face will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
LEVERAGE
For the purpose of making investments other than temporary investments and to take advantage of favorable interest rates, we intend to issue senior debt securities (including borrowings under our current lines of credit) up to the maximum amount permitted by the 1940 Act. The 1940 Act currently permits us to issue senior debt securities and preferred stock, to which we refer collectively as senior securities, in amounts such that our asset coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act, is at least 200% after each issuance of senior securities. We may also incur such indebtedness to repurchase our common stock. As a result of issuing senior securities, we are exposed to the risks of leverage. Although borrowing money for investments increases the potential for gain, it also increases the risk of a loss. A decrease in the value of our investments will have a greater impact on the value of our common stock to the extent that we have borrowed money to make investments. There is a possibility that the costs of borrowing could exceed the income we receive on the investments we make with such borrowed funds. In addition, our ability to pay dividends or incur additional indebtedness would be restricted if asset coverage is less than twice our indebtedness. If the value of our assets declines, we might be unable to satisfy that test. If this happens, we may be required to liquidate a portion of our loan portfolio and repay a portion of our indebtedness at a time when a sale may be disadvantageous. Furthermore, any amounts that we use to service our indebtedness will not be available for distributions to our stockholders. Our Board of Directors is authorized to provide for the issuance of preferred stock with such preferences, powers, rights and privileges as it deems appropriate, except that such an issuance must adhere to the requirements of the 1940 Act. See “Regulation—Business Development Company—Asset Coverage” for a discussion of leveraging constraints.
5
SECURITIZATION
On February 3, 2003, we established a wholly-owned subsidiary, Gladstone Business Loan LLC, “Business Loan”, for the purpose of acquiring and holding certain of our loans. Business Loan has entered into a credit agreement with a group of institutional lenders that provides a $100 million revolving credit facility, the proceeds of which Business Loan uses to purchase loans from us. We, in turn, use these proceeds to make additional loans and increase the size of our loan portfolio. We currently intend to securitize all of the loans held by Business Loan and will use the proceeds from the securitization to pay down any amounts outstanding under the revolving credit facility.
INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
We seek to achieve a high level of current income by investing in debt securities, consisting primarily of senior notes, senior subordinated notes and junior subordinated notes, of established private businesses that are backed by leveraged buyout funds, venture capital funds or others, with a particular emphasis on senior subordinated notes. We also seek to provide our stockholders with long-term capital growth through the appreciation in the value of warrants or other equity instruments that we may receive when we make loans. The following restrictions, along with these investment objectives, are our only fundamental policies, which are policies that may not be changed without the approval of the holders of the majority of our outstanding voting securities, as defined in the 1940 Act. For a fuller explanation of the regulatory framework in which we operate, see “Business-Regulation.” The percentage restrictions set forth below, other than the restriction pertaining to the issuance of senior securities, as well as those contained elsewhere in this Form 10-K, apply at the time we effect a transaction, and a subsequent change in a percentage resulting from market fluctuations or any cause other than an action by us will not require us to dispose of portfolio securities or to take other action to satisfy the percentage restriction. We will at all times conduct our business so as to retain our status as a business development company. In order to retain that status, we may not acquire any assets (other than non-investment assets necessary and appropriate to our operations as a business development company) if, after giving effect to such acquisition, the value of our “qualifying assets” is less than 70% of the value of our total assets. We anticipate that the securities we seek to acquire (provided that we control or, through our officers or other participants in the financing transaction, make significant managerial assistance available to the issuers of these securities), as well as temporary investments, will generally be qualifying assets.
We may invest up to 100% of our assets in securities acquired directly from issuers in privately negotiated transactions. With respect to such securities, we may, for the purpose of public resale, be deemed an “underwriter” as that term is defined in the Securities Act. We may invest up to 20% of our assets in securities of a particular issuer. We may exceed this limitation in connection with bridge financings, although these bridge investments will never exceed 25% of our total assets at any time. We do not intend to concentrate our investments in any particular industry or group of industries. However, it is possible that, as the values of our portfolio companies change, one industry or a group of industries may comprise in excess of 25% of the value of our total assets.
We will at all times endeavor to conduct our business so as to retain our status as a regulated investment company under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “Code”). In order to do so, we must meet income source, asset diversification and annual distribution requirements. We may issue senior securities, such as debt or preferred stock, to the extent permitted by the 1940 Act for the purpose of making investments, to fund share repurchases, or for temporary emergency or other purposes. For a discussion of the risks associated with the resulting leverage, see “Business—Leverage” and “Risk Factors—Our business is dependent upon external financing which may expose us to the risks associated with leverage.”
We will not (1) act as an underwriter of securities of other issuers (except to the extent that we may be deemed an “underwriter” of securities we purchase that must be registered under the Securities Act before they may be offered or sold to the public); (2) purchase or sell real estate or interests in real estate or real estate investment trusts (except that we may (a) purchase and sell real estate or interests in real estate in connection with the orderly liquidation of investments, (b) own the securities of companies or participate in a partnership or partnerships that are in the business of buying, selling or developing real estate, or (c) finance the purchase of real estate by our portfolio companies); (3) sell securities short (except with regard to managing the risks associated with publicly-traded securities issued by our portfolio companies); (4) purchase securities on margin (except to the extent that we may purchase securities with borrowed money); (5) write or buy put or call options (except (i) to the extent of warrants or conversion privileges in connection with our acquisition financing or other investments and rights to require the issuers of such investments or their affiliates to repurchase them under certain circumstances, (ii) with regard to managing risks associated with publicly-traded securities issued by our portfolio companies, or (iii) with regard to managing the risks associated with interest rate fluctuations);
6
(6) engage in the purchase or sale of commodities or commodity contracts, including futures contracts (except where necessary in working out distressed loan or investment situations or in managing the risks associated with interest rate fluctuations); or (7) acquire more than 3% of the voting stock of, or invest more than 5% of our total assets in, any securities issued by any other investment company (except as they may be acquired as part of a merger, consolidation or acquisition of assets). That portion of our investments that is in securities issued by other investment companies may subject our stockholders to additional expenses.
EXTERNAL INVESTMENT ADVISER
Prior to October 1, 2004, we did not have an external investment adviser. We were managed internally by our executive officers under the supervision of our Board of Directors, and had an expense sharing arrangement with our affiliate, Gladstone Management Corporation (“Gladstone Management”), a registered investment adviser. Under the expense sharing arrangement, Gladstone Management reimbursed our wholly-owned subsidiary Gladstone Capital Advisers for a portion of our total payroll and benefits expenses based on the percentage of total hours worked by each of our employees on Gladstone Commercial Corporation (“Gladstone Commercial”) matters. Gladstone Management further passed its share of these expenses along to Gladstone Commercial under a separate advisory agreement. Gladstone Commercial is a publicly traded real estate investment trust affiliated with us and managed by Gladstone Management. Prior to October 1, 2004, Gladstone Management also reimbursed Gladstone Capital Advisers for its pro rata portion of all other general expenses based on the percentage of total hours worked by all of our employees on Gladstone Commercial matters.
Effective October 1, 2004, we entered into an investment advisory and administrative agreement with Gladstone Management pursuant to which Gladstone Management became our external investment adviser. Our expense sharing arrangement with Gladstone Management terminated immediately upon our engagement of Gladstone Management as our external advisor. Under the management agreement, Gladstone Management now directly employs all of our personnel and pays its payroll, benefits, and general expenses directly. Pursuant to the management agreement, we pay Gladstone Management an annual advisory fee of 1.25% of our total assets (as reduced by cash and cash equivalents pledged to creditors), payable in quarterly increments of 0.3125%, and an annual administrative fee of 0.75% of our total assets (as reduced by cash and cash equivalents pledged to creditors), payable in quarterly increments of 0.1875%. Managerial assistance fees received by our investment adviser will be credited against the investment advisory fee. We continue to pay direct expenses including, but not limited to, directors fees, legal and accounting fees, and stockholder related expenses.
EMPLOYEES
Effective October 1, 2004, all of our executives, managing directors, principals, administrative staff and other personnel became direct employees of our external investment adviser, Gladstone Management. However, our executives, managing directors, principals, administrative staff and other personnel will continue to be eligible to receive awards under our Amended and Restated 2001 Equity Incentive Plan. The employees of Gladstone Management perform services on our behalf and on behalf of Gladstone Commercial. Most of the employees of Gladstone Management devote some or most of their time to work on our matters. We believe that our relations with these employees are excellent.
REGULATION
We are a closed-end, non-diversified, management investment company that has elected to be regulated as a business development company under Section 54 of the 1940 Act. As such, we are subject to regulation under the 1940 Act. The 1940 Act contains prohibitions and restrictions relating to transactions between business development companies and their affiliates, principal underwriters and affiliates of those affiliates or underwriters and requires that a majority of the directors be persons other than “interested persons,” as defined in the 1940 Act. In addition, the 1940 Act provides that we may not change the nature of our business so as to cease to be, or to withdraw our election as, a business development company unless approved by a majority of our outstanding voting securities.
Regulated Investment Company
In order to maintain the qualification for treatment as a regulated investment company, or RIC, under Subchapter M of the Code, we must distribute to our stockholders, for each taxable year, at least 90% of our investment company taxable income, which is generally our ordinary income plus short-term capital gains. We refer to this as the annual distribution requirement. We must also meet several additional requirements, including:
7
• Income source requirements. At least 90% of our gross income for each taxable year must be from dividends, interest, payments with respect to securities loans, gains from sales or other dispositions of securities or other income derived with respect to our business of investing in securities, and
• Asset diversification requirements. As of the close of each quarter of our taxable year: (1) at least 50% of the value of our assets must consist of cash, cash items, US government securities, the securities of other regulated investment companies and other securities to the extent that (a) we do not hold more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of an issuer of such other securities and (b) such other securities of any one issuer do not represent more than 5% of our total assets, and (2) no more than 25% of the value of our total assets may be invested in the securities of one issuer (other than US government securities or the securities of other regulated investment companies), or of two or more issuers that are controlled by us and are engaged in the same or similar or related trades or businesses.
If we are unable to qualify for treatment as a RIC, we will be subject to tax on all of our taxable income at regular corporate rates. We would not be able to deduct distributions to stockholders, nor would we be required to make such distributions. Distributions would be taxable to our stockholders as ordinary dividend income to the extent of our current and accumulated earnings and profits. Subject to certain limitations under the Code, corporate distributees would be eligible for the dividends received deduction.
Distributions in excess of our current and accumulated earnings and profits would be treated first as a return of capital to the extent of the stockholder’s tax basis, and then as a gain realized from the sale or exchange of property. If we fail to meet the RIC requirements for more than two consecutive years and then seek to requalify as a RIC, we would be required to recognize gain to the extent of any unrealized appreciation on our assets unless we make a special election to pay corporate-level tax on any such unrealized appreciation recognized during the succeeding 10-year period. Absent such special election, any gain we recognized would be deemed distributed to our stockholders as a taxable distribution. If we qualify as a RIC and distribute to stockholders each year in a timely manner at least 90% of our investment company taxable income, we will not be subject to federal income tax on the portion of our taxable income and gains we distribute to stockholders. We would, however, be subject to a 4% nondeductible federal excise tax if we do not distribute, actually or on a deemed basis, 98% of our income, including both ordinary income and capital gains. The excise tax would apply only to the amount by which 98% of our income exceeds the amount of income we distribute, actually or on a deemed basis, to stockholders.
We will be subject to regular corporate income tax, currently at rates up to 35%, on any undistributed income, including both ordinary income and capital gains. We intend to retain some or all of our capital gains, but to designate the retained amount as a deemed distribution. In that case, among other consequences, we will pay tax on the retained amount, each stockholder will be required to include its share of the deemed distribution in income as if it had been actually distributed to the stockholder and the stockholder will be entitled to claim a credit or refund equal to its allocable share of the tax we pay on the retained capital gain. The amount of the deemed distribution net of such tax will be added to the stockholder’s cost basis for its common stock. Since we expect to pay tax on any retained capital gains at our regular corporate capital gain tax rate, and since that rate is in excess of the maximum rate currently payable by individuals on long-term capital gains, the amount of tax that individual stockholders will be treated as having paid will exceed the tax they owe on the capital gain dividend and such excess may be claimed as a credit or refund against the stockholder’s other tax obligations. A stockholder that is not subject to US federal income tax or tax on long-term capital gains would be required to file a US federal income tax return on the appropriate form in order to claim a refund for the taxes we paid. In order to utilize the deemed distribution approach, we must provide written notice to the stockholders prior to the expiration of 60 days after the close of the relevant tax year. We will also be subject to alternative minimum tax, but any tax preference items would be apportioned between us and our stockholders in the same proportion that dividends, other than capital gain dividends, paid to each stockholder bear to our taxable income determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction.
If we acquire debt obligations that were originally issued at a discount, which would generally include loans we make that are accompanied by warrants, that bear interest at rates that are not either fixed rates or certain qualified variable rates or that are not unconditionally payable at least annually over the life of the obligation, we will be required to include in taxable income each year a portion of the “original issue discount” that accrues over the life of the obligation. Such original issue discount will be included in our investment company taxable income even though we receive no cash corresponding to such discount amount. As a result, we may be required to make additional distributions corresponding to such original issue discount amounts in order to satisfy the annual distribution requirement and to continue to qualify as a RIC or to avoid the 4% excise tax. In this event, we may be required to sell temporary investments or other assets to meet the RIC distribution requirements.
8
For any period during which we qualify for treatment as a RIC for federal income tax purposes, distributions to our stockholders attributable to our investment company taxable income generally will be taxable as ordinary income to stockholders to the extent of our current or accumulated earnings and profits. Any distributions in excess of our earnings and profits will first be treated as a return of capital to the extent of the stockholder’s adjusted basis in his or her shares of common stock and thereafter as gain from the sale of shares of our common stock. Distributions of our long-term capital gains, designated by us as such, will be taxable to stockholders as long-term capital gains regardless of the stockholder’s holding period for its common stock and whether the distributions are paid in cash or invested in additional common stock. Corporate stockholders are generally eligible for the 70% dividends received deduction with respect to ordinary income, but not to capital gains dividends to the extent such amount designated by us does not exceed the dividends received by us from domestic corporations. Any dividend declared by us in October, November or December of any calendar year, payable to stockholders of record on a specified date in such a month and actually paid during January of the following year, will be treated as if it were paid by us and received by the stockholders on December 31 of the previous year. In addition, we may elect to relate a dividend back to the prior taxable year if we (1) declare such dividend prior to the due date for filing our return for that taxable year, (2) make the election in that return, and (3) distribute the amount in the 12-month period following the close of the taxable year but not later than the first regular dividend payment following the declaration. Any such election will not alter the general rule that a stockholder will be treated as receiving a dividend in the taxable year in which the distribution is made, subject to the October, November, December rule described above.
The “Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003” did not alter the nature of our dividends that we pay to stockholders as taxable ordinary income. Accordingly, our dividends paid are not eligible for the lower tax rate.
Business Development Company
We intend to conduct our business so as to retain our status as a business development company. In general, a business development company must have been organized and have its principal place of business in the United States and must be operated for the purpose of making investments in the types of securities described in (1) or (2) below.
Qualifying Assets. Under the 1940 Act, a business development company may not acquire any asset other than assets of the type listed in Section 55(a) of the 1940 Act, which are referred to as qualifying assets, unless, at the time the acquisition is made, qualifying assets represent at least 70% of the company’s total assets. The principal categories of qualifying assets relevant to our business are the following:
(1) Securities purchased in transactions not involving any public offering from the issuer of such securities, which issuer is an eligible portfolio company. An eligible portfolio company is generally defined in the 1940 Act as any issuer which, first, is organized under the laws of, and has its principal place of business in, the United States. Second, the issuer must not be an investment company, other than a small business investment company wholly-owned by the business development company. Finally, the issuer may not have any class of securities with respect to which a broker or dealer may extend margin credit.
(2) Securities of any eligible portfolio company over which we exercise a controlling influence and for which an affiliate of ours serves as a director.
(3) Securities received in exchange for or distributed on or with respect to securities described in (1) or (2) above, or pursuant to the exercise of options, warrants or rights relating to such securities.
(4) Cash, cash items, government securities or high quality debt securities maturing in one year or less from the time of investment.
Securities of public companies are generally not qualifying assets unless they were acquired in a distribution or in exchange for, or upon the exercise of, a right relating to securities that were qualifying assets.
9
Asset Coverage. We are permitted, under specified conditions, to issue multiple classes of indebtedness and one class of stock senior to our common stock if our asset coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act, is at least 200% immediately after each such issuance. In addition, while senior securities are outstanding, we must make provisions to prohibit any distribution to our stockholders or the repurchase of such securities or shares unless we meet the applicable asset coverage ratios at the time of the distribution or repurchase. We may also borrow amounts up to 5% of the value of our total assets for temporary purposes. The 1940 Act requires, among other things, that (1) immediately after issuance and before any dividend or distribution is made with respect to our common stock or before any purchase of common stock is made, the preferred stock, together with all other senior securities, must not exceed an amount equal to 50% of our total assets after deducting the amount of such dividend, distribution or purchase price, as the case may be, and (2) the holders of shares of preferred stock, if any are issued, must be entitled as a class to elect two directors at all times and to elect a majority of the directors if dividends on the preferred stock are in arrears by two years or more.
Significant Managerial Assistance. For portfolio securities to be qualifying assets for the 70% test described above, the business development company must either exercise a controlling influence over the issuer of the securities or must make available to the issuer of the securities significant managerial assistance. However, with respect to certain but not all such securities, where the business development company purchases such securities in conjunction with one or more other persons acting together, one of the other persons in the group may make available such managerial assistance, or the business development company may exercise such control jointly. Making available significant managerial assistance means, among other things, any arrangement whereby the business development company, through its directors, officers or employees, offers to provide, and, if accepted, does so provide, significant guidance and counsel concerning the management, operations or business objectives and policies of a portfolio company.
Determination of Net Asset Value
The net asset value per share of our outstanding shares is determined quarterly, as soon as practicable after and as of the end of each calendar quarter, by dividing the value of total assets minus liabilities by the total number of shares outstanding at the date as of which the determination is made.
We carry our investments at fair value. Securities that are publicly traded, if any, are valued at the closing price of the exchange or securities market on which they are listed on the valuation date (to date there are no publicly traded securities in our portfolio). Securities which are not publicly traded on an exchange or securities market, but for which a limited market exists, such as participations in syndicated loans, are valued at the indicative bid price offered by the syndication agent on the valuation date. For securities that are not publicly traded and do not have a limited market, the carrying value is based on valuations determined in good faith by our Board of Directors. A majority of our loan portfolio, which consists of securities for which a limited market does not exist and are not publicly traded, is reviewed by Standard & Poor’s Loan Evaluation Service (S&P). S&P provides an independent assessment of the loan portfolio data provided by us and assesses its own data to develop recommendations as to market values for these securities. Our Board of Directors votes on whether to accept the valuation recommendations presented by S&P. To date the Board of Directors has always accepted the values recommended by S&P. Due to the uncertainty inherent in the valuation process, such estimates of fair value may differ significantly from the values that would have been obtained had a ready market for the securities existed, and the differences could be material. Additionally, changes in the market environment and other events that may occur over the life of the investments may cause the gains or losses ultimately realized on these investments to be different than the valuations currently assigned.
A substantial portion of our assets will consist of securities carried at fair market value, as determined by our Board of Directors. Determination of fair market values, for those securities and investments not valued by S&P, involves subjective judgment not susceptible to substantiation by auditing procedures. Accordingly, under generally accepted accounting principles, the notes to our consolidated financial statements will refer to the uncertainty with respect to the possible effect of such valuations on our financial statements.
Code of Ethics
We and Gladstone Management have adopted a code of ethics and business conduct applicable to our officers, directors and all employees that complies with the guidelines set forth in Item 406 of Regulation S-K of the Securities Act. As required by the 1940 Act, this code establishes procedures for personal investments and restricts certain transactions by our personnel. A copy of this code is available for review, free of charge, at our website at www.GladstoneCapital.com.
10
RISK FACTORS
An investment in our securities involves a number of significant risks and other factors relating to our structure and investment objectives. As a result, we cannot assure you that we will achieve our investment objectives. You should consider carefully the following information before making an investment in our securities.
We are dependent upon our key management personnel for our future success, particularly David Gladstone, George Stelljes III and Terry Lee Brubaker.
We are dependent on the diligence, skill and network of business contacts of our senior management and other management members for the final selection, structuring, closing and monitoring of our investments. Our future success depends to a significant extent on the continued service and coordination of our senior management team, particularly David Gladstone, our chairman and chief executive officer, George Stelljes III, our president and chief investment officer, and Terry Lee Brubaker, our vice-chairman and chief operating officer. The departure of any of our executive officers or key employees from us or from our adviser, Gladstone Management, could have a material adverse effect on our ability to implement our business strategy and to achieve our investment objectives.
Our financial condition and results of operations will depend on our ability to effectively manage our future growth.
Our ability to achieve our investment objectives will depend on our ability to sustain continued growth, which will depend on our ability to identify, evaluate, finance and invest in suitable companies that meet our investment criteria. Accomplishing this result on a cost-effective basis is largely a function of our marketing capabilities, our management of the investment process, our ability to provide competent, attentive and efficient services and our access to financing sources on acceptable terms. As we grow, Gladstone Management will also be required to hire, train, supervise and manage new employees. Failure to effectively manage our future growth could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We operate in a highly competitive market for investment opportunities.
A large number of entities compete with us and make the types of investments that we seek to make in small and medium sized privately owned businesses. We compete with a large number of private equity funds, leveraged buyout funds and venture capital funds, investment banks and other equity and non-equity based investment funds, and other sources of financing, including traditional financial services companies such as commercial banks. Many of our competitors are substantially larger and have considerably greater financial, technical and marketing resources than we do. For example, some competitors may have a lower cost of funds and access to funding sources that are not available to us. In addition, certain of our competitors may have higher risk tolerances or different risk assessments, which could allow them to consider a wider variety of investments and establish more relationships and build their market shares. Furthermore, many of our potential competitors are not subject to the regulatory restrictions that the 1940 Act imposes on us as a business development company. We cannot assure you that the competitive pressures we face will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Also, as a result of this competition, we may not be able to take advantage of attractive investment opportunities from time to time and there can be no assurance that we will be able to identify and make investments that satisfy our investment objectives or that we will be able to fully invest our available capital.
Our business model is dependent upon developing and sustaining strong referral relationships with leveraged buyout funds and venture capital funds.
We are dependent upon informal relationships with leveraged buyout funds, venture capital funds, and traditional lending institutions to provide us with deal flow. If we fail to maintain our relationship with such funds or institutions, or if we fail to establish strong referral relationships with other funds, we will not be able to grow our portfolio of loans and fully execute our business plan.
11
Our loans to small and medium sized borrowers are extremely risky and you could lose your entire investment.
Loans to small and medium sized borrowers are subject to a number of significant risks including the following:
• Small and medium sized businesses may have limited financial resources and may not be able to repay the loans we make to them. Our strategy includes providing financing to borrowers that typically is not readily available to them. While we believe that this provides an attractive opportunity for us to generate profits, this may make it difficult for the borrowers to repay their loans to us upon maturity. A borrower’s ability to repay its loan may be adversely affected by numerous factors, including the failure to meet its business plan, a downturn in its industry or negative economic conditions. A deterioration in a borrower’s financial condition and prospects usually will be accompanied by a deterioration in the value of any collateral and a reduction in the likelihood of us realizing on any guarantees we may have obtained from the borrower’s management. Although we will sometimes seek to be the senior, secured lender to a borrower, in most of our loans we expect to be subordinated to a senior lender, and our interest in any collateral would, accordingly, likely be subordinate to another lender’s security interest.
• Small and medium sized businesses typically have narrower product lines and smaller market shares than large businesses. Because our target borrowers are smaller businesses, they will tend to be more vulnerable to competitors’ actions and market conditions, as well as general economic downturns. In addition, our portfolio companies may face intense competition, including competition from companies with greater financial resources, more extensive development, manufacturing, marketing and other capabilities and a larger number of qualified managerial and technical personnel.
• There is generally little or no publicly available information about these businesses. Because we seek to make loans to privately owned businesses, there is generally little or no publicly available operating and financial information about our potential borrowers. As a result, we rely on our officers, other employees and consultants to perform due diligence investigations of these borrowers, their operations and their prospects. We may not learn all of the material information we need to know regarding these businesses through our investigations.
• Small and medium sized businesses generally have less predictable operating results. We expect that our borrowers may have significant variations in their operating results, may from time to time be parties to litigation, may be engaged in rapidly changing businesses with products subject to a substantial risk of obsolescence, may require substantial additional capital to support their operations, to finance expansion or to maintain their competitive position, may otherwise have a weak financial position or may be adversely affected by changes in the business cycle. Our portfolio companies may not meet net income, cash flow and other coverage tests typically imposed by their senior lenders. A borrower’s failure to satisfy financial or operating covenants imposed by senior lenders could lead to defaults and, potentially, foreclosure on its senior credit facility, which could additionally trigger cross-defaults in other agreements. If this were to occur, it is possible that the borrower’s ability to repay our loan would be jeopardized.
• Small and medium sized businesses are more likely to be dependent on one or two persons. Typically, the success of a small or medium sized business also depends on the management talents and efforts of one or two persons or a small group of persons. The death, disability or resignation of one or more of these persons could have a material adverse impact on our borrower and, in turn, on us.
• Small and medium sized businesses are likely to have greater exposure to economic downturns than larger businesses. We expect that our borrowers will have fewer resources than larger businesses and an economic downturn is more likely to have a material adverse effect on them. If one of our borrowers is adversely impacted by an economic downturn, its ability to repay our loan would be diminished.
• Small and medium sized businesses may have limited operating histories. While we intend to target stable companies with proven track records, we may make loans to new companies that meet our other investment criteria. Borrowers with limited operating histories will be exposed to all of the operating risks that new businesses face and may be particularly susceptible to, among other risks, market downturns, competitive pressures and the departure of key executive officers.
12
We may not realize gains from our equity investments and other yield enhancements.
When we make a subordinated loan, we generally expect to receive warrants to purchase stock issued by the borrower or other yield enhancements, such as success fees (conditional interest). Our goal is to ultimately dispose of these equity interests and realize gains upon our disposition of such interests. We expect that, over time, the gains we realize on these warrants and other yield enhancements will offset any losses we experience on loan defaults. However, any warrants we receive may not appreciate in value and, in fact, may decline in value and any other yield enhancements, such as success fees, may not be realized. Accordingly, we may not be able to realize gains from our equity interests or other yield enhancements and any gains we do recognize may not be sufficient to offset losses we experience on our loan portfolio.
Because the loans we make and equity securities we receive when we make loans are not publicly traded, there will be uncertainty regarding the value of our privately held securities that could adversely affect our determination of our net asset value.
We expect that very few, if any, of our portfolio loans or equity securities, at least initially, will be publicly traded or have a readily determinable market value. We value these securities based on a determination of their fair value, based on recommendations provided by S&P and management and approved by our Board of Directors. Due to the uncertainty inherent in valuing these securities, our determinations of fair value may differ materially from the values that would exist if a ready market for these securities existed. Our net asset value could be materially affected if our determinations regarding the fair value of our investments are materially different from the values that we ultimately realize on our disposal of such securities.
The lack of liquidity of our privately held investments may adversely affect our business.
Most of our investments presently consist of, and will continue to consist of, loans and warrants acquired in private transactions directly from borrowers or from the originators of loans to such borrowers. Substantially all of the investments we presently hold are, and the investments we expect to acquire in the future will be, subject to restrictions on resale, including, in some instances, legal restrictions, or will otherwise be less liquid than publicly traded securities. The illiquidity of our investments may make it difficult for us to quickly obtain cash equal to the value at which we record our investments if the need arises. This could cause us to miss important business opportunities. In addition, if we are required to quickly liquidate all or a portion of our portfolio, we may realize significantly less than the value at which we have previously recorded our investments.
Our portfolio will be concentrated in a limited number of companies and industries, which subjects us to an increased risk of significant loss if any one of these companies does not repay us or if the industries experience downturns.
We intend to have outstanding loans to approximately 20 to 40 portfolio companies at any given time. A consequence of a limited number of investments is that the aggregate returns we realize may be substantially adversely affected by the unfavorable performance of a small number of such loans or a substantial writedown of any one investment. Beyond our regulatory and income tax diversification requirements, we do not have fixed guidelines for industry concentration and our investments could potentially be concentrated in relatively few industries. In addition, while we do not intend to invest 25% or more of our total assets in a particular industry or group of industries at the time of investment, it is possible that as the values of our portfolio companies change, one industry or a group of industries may comprise in excess of 25% of the value of our total assets. As a result, a downturn in an industry in which we have made multiple loans could have a materially adverse effect on us.
Our business plan is dependent upon external financing which may expose us to risks associated with leverage.
Our business will require a substantial amount of cash to operate and grow. We may acquire such additional capital from the following sources:
13
• Senior Securities. We intend to issue debt securities, other evidences of indebtedness (including borrowings under our lines of credit) and possibly preferred stock, up to the maximum amount permitted by the 1940 Act. The 1940 Act currently permits us, as a business development company, to issue debt securities and preferred stock, to which we refer collectively as senior securities, in amounts such that our asset coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act, is at least 200% after each issuance of senior securities. As a result of issuing senior securities, we will be exposed to the risks associated with leverage. Although borrowing money for investments increases the potential for gain, it also increases the risk of a loss. A decrease in the value of our investments will have a greater impact on the value of our common stock to the extent that we have borrowed money to make investments. There is a possibility that the costs of borrowing could exceed the income we receive on the investments we make with such borrowed funds. In addition, our ability to pay dividends or incur additional indebtedness would be restricted if asset coverage is not at least twice our indebtedness. If the value of our assets declines, we might be unable to satisfy that test. If this happens, we may be required to liquidate a portion of our loan portfolio and repay a portion of our indebtedness at a time when a sale may be disadvantageous. Furthermore, any amounts that we use to service our indebtedness will not be available for distributions to our stockholders.
• Common Stock. Because we are constrained in our ability to issue debt for the reasons given above, we are dependent on the issuance of equity as a financing source. If we raise additional funds by issuing more common stock or debt securities convertible into or exchangeable for our common stock, the percentage ownership of our stockholders at the time of the issuance would decrease and they may experience dilution. In addition, any convertible or exchangeable securities that we issue in the future may have rights, preferences and privileges more favorable than those of our common stock.
• Securitization. In addition to issuing securities to raise capital as described above, we anticipate that in the future we will securitize our loans to generate cash for funding new investments. An inability to successfully securitize our loan portfolio could limit our ability to grow our business, fully execute our business strategy and impact our profitability. Moreover, successful securitization of our loan portfolio might expose us to losses as the loans in which we do not plan to sell interests will be those that are riskier and more apt to generate losses.
A change in interest rates may adversely affect our profitability and our hedging strategy may expose us to additional risks.
We anticipate using a combination of equity and long-term and short-term borrowings to finance our lending activities. As a result, a portion of our income will depend upon the difference between the rate at which we borrow funds and the rate at which we loan these funds. Certain of our borrowings may be at fixed rates and others at variable rates. Ultimately, we expect approximately 50% of the loans in our portfolio to be at fixed rates and approximately 50% to be at variable rates determined on the basis of a benchmark prime rate. As of September 30, 2004, our portfolio had approximately 35% of the total of the loan portfolio cost at fixed rates, approximately 42% of the total of the loan cost value at variable rates with a floor, and the remaining 23% at variable rates. We will typically seek to hedge against the risk of adverse movement in interest rates on our borrowings relative to our portfolio of assets. As required by our warehouse line of credit, we hedge against interest rate fluctuations by using standard hedging instruments such as futures, options and forward contracts. While hedging activities may insulate us against adverse fluctuations in interest rates, they may also limit our ability to participate in the benefits of lower interest rates with respect to the hedged portfolio. Adverse developments resulting from changes in interest rates or hedging transactions could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our credit facilities impose certain limitations on us.
We will have a continuing need for capital to finance our loans. In order to maintain RIC status, we will be required to distribute to our stockholders at least 90% of our ordinary income and short-term capital gains on an annual basis. Accordingly, such earnings will not be available to fund additional loans. Therefore, we are party to a credit agreement arranged by Deutsche Bank AG as the structuring agent. The agreement provides us with a revolving credit line facility of $100 million. We also recently entered into a $15 million short-term revolving line of credit with BB&T. In the future, borrowings outstanding on these credit lines may be repaid with the proceeds we may receive from securitizing some or all of the loans in our portfolio for long-term funding. These credit line facilities will permit us to fund additional loans and investments as long as we are within the conditions set out in the credit agreement.
As a result of the credit line facilities, we are subject to certain limitations on the type of loan investments we make, including restrictions on geographic concentrations, sector concentrations, loan size, payment frequency and status, and average life.
14
Our failure to satisfy these limitations could result in foreclosure by our lenders which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our investments will typically be long term and will require several years to realize liquidation events.
Since we generally intend to make five to seven year term loans and to hold our loans and related warrants or other yield enhancements until the loans mature, you should not expect realization events, if any, to occur over the near term. In addition, we expect that any warrants or other yield enhancements that we receive when we make loans may require several years to appreciate in value and we cannot give any assurance that such appreciation will occur.
We will be subject to corporate level tax if we are unable to satisfy Internal Revenue Code requirements for RIC qualification.
To maintain our qualification as a RIC, we must meet income source, asset diversification and annual distribution requirements. The annual distribution requirement is satisfied if we distribute at least 90% of our ordinary income and short-term capital gains to our stockholders on an annual basis. Because we use leverage, we are subject to certain asset coverage ratio requirements under the 1940 Act and could, under certain circumstances, be restricted from making distributions necessary to qualify as a RIC. Warrants we receive with respect to debt investments will create “original issue discount,” which we must recognize as ordinary income, increasing the amounts we are required to distribute to maintain RIC status. Because such warrants will not produce distributable cash for us at the same time as we are required to make distributions in respect of the related original issue discount, we will need to use cash from other sources to satisfy such distribution requirements. The asset diversification requirements must be met at the end of each calendar quarter. If we fail to meet these tests, we may need to quickly dispose of certain investments to prevent the loss of RIC status. Since most of our investments will be illiquid, such dispositions, if even possible, may not be made at prices advantageous to us and, in fact, may result in substantial losses. If we fail to qualify as a RIC for any reason and become fully subject to corporate income tax, the resulting corporate taxes could substantially reduce our net assets, the amount of income available for distribution, and the actual amount distributed. Such a failure would have a material adverse effect on us and our shares. For additional information regarding asset coverage ratio and RIC requirements, see “Business—Leverage” and “Business—Regulation.”
There are significant potential conflicts of interest which could impact our investment returns.
Our executive officers and directors may serve as officers and directors of entities that operate in the same or similar lines of business as we do. Accordingly, they may have obligations to investors in those entities, the fulfillment of which might not be in the best interests of us or our stockholders. It is possible that new investment opportunities that meet our investment objectives may come to the attention of one of our executive officers or directors, such as Mr. Gladstone, in his role as an officer or director of another entity, and, if so, such opportunity might not be offered, or otherwise made available, to us.
If our primary investments are deemed not to be qualifying assets, we could lose our status as a business development company or be precluded from investing according to our current business plan.
If we are to maintain our status as a business development company, we must not acquire any assets other than “qualifying assets” unless, at the time of and after giving effect to such acquisition, at least 70% of our total assets are qualifying assets. If we acquire senior loans, mezzanine debt or equity securities from an issuer which has outstanding marginable securities at the time we make an investment, these acquired assets cannot be treated as qualifying assets. (See “Business—Regulation—Business Development Company—Qualifying Assets.”) This results from the definition of “eligible portfolio company” under the 1940 Act, which in part looks to whether a company has outstanding marginable securities.
Amendments promulgated in 1998 by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System to Regulation T under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, expanded the definition of marginable security to include any non-equity security. These amendments have raised questions as to whether a private company that has outstanding debt
would qualify as an eligible portfolio company.
15
We believe that substantially all of the senior loans, subordinated loans and equity securities that we hold and propose to acquire in the future should constitute qualifying assets because our current borrowers did not, and our expected future borrowers will not, at the time of our investment, have outstanding marginable securities. First, we have historically made, and expect to continue to make, a large portion of our senior loan and subordinated loan investments on terms and in circumstances such that those investments should not under existing legal precedent be “securities” under the Exchange Act and therefore should not be marginable securities under Regulation T. Second, we believe that should a different position be taken such that those investments may be securities, they should still not be marginable securities. In particular, debt instruments that do not trade in a public secondary market or are not rated investment grade are not margin eligible securities under the rules established by the self- regulatory organizations, including the New York Stock Exchange and National Association of Securities Dealers, that govern the terms on which broker-dealers may extend margin credit. Until the questions raised by the amendments to Regulation T have been addressed by legislative, administrative or judicial action, we intend to treat as qualifying assets only those senior loans and subordinated loans that are not investment grade, do not have a public secondary market, and are issued by a private issuer that does not have outstanding a class of margin eligible securities at the time of our investment. Likewise, we will treat equity securities issued by a portfolio company as qualifying assets only if such securities are issued by a private company that has no marginable securities outstanding at the time we purchase such securities.
To date, we do not believe that either the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff has taken any position with respect to our analysis of the issues discussed above. We intend to adjust our investment focus as needed to comply with and/or take advantage of any future administrative position, judicial decision or legislative action.
The Securities and Exchange Commission has recently proposed amendments to the rules concerning business development companies that would clarify that, among other things, companies that do not have a class of securities listed on an exchange or Nasdaq would be considered eligible portfolio companies. If these rules are adopted as proposed, it would remove the uncertainty concerning the status of certain of our investments as qualifying assets by clarifying that all of our portfolio companies would be considered eligible portfolio companies. There can be no guarantee that the SEC will adopt these rules substantially as proposed, if at all.
Unless and until the proposed rules described above are adopted, if there were a court ruling or regulatory decision that conflicts with our interpretations, we could lose our status as a business development company or be precluded from investing in the manner described in this prospectus. This in turn could cause us to lose our status as a RIC. Any of these results would have a material adverse effect on our ability to invest in the manner described in this prospectus, on our operating results, financial condition and ability to pay dividends, and on the value of our common stock, For information regarding the consequences of failure to qualify as a RIC, see “Business—We will be subject to corporate level income tax if we are unable to satisfy Internal Revenue Code requirements for RIC qualification.”
Such a ruling or decision also may require that we dispose of investments that we made based on our interpretation of Regulation T. Such dispositions could have a material adverse effect on us and our stockholders. We may need to dispose of such investments quickly, which would make it difficult to dispose of such investments on favorable terms. In addition, because these types of investments will generally be illiquid, we may have difficulty in finding a buyer and, even if we do find a buyer, we may have to sell the investments at a substantial loss. See “Business—The lack of liquidity of our privately held investments may adversely affect our business.”
Changes in laws or regulations governing our operations may adversely affect our business.
We and our portfolio companies will be subject to regulation by laws at the local, state and federal level. These laws and regulations, as well as their interpretation, may be changed from time to time. Accordingly, any change in these laws or regulations could have a material adverse impact on our business. For additional information regarding the regulations to which we are subject, see “Business—Regulation”
We may experience fluctuation in our quarterly results.
We could experience fluctuations in our quarterly operating results due to a number of factors including, among others, variations in and the timing of the recognition of realized and unrealized gains or losses, the degree to which we encounter competition in our markets and general economic conditions. As a result of these factors, results for any period should not be relied upon as being indicative of performance in future periods.
16
There is a risk that you may not receive dividends or that our dividends may not grow over time.
Our current intention is to distribute at least 90% of our ordinary income and short-term capital gains to our stockholders on a quarterly basis. We expect to retain net realized long-term capital gains to supplement our equity capital and support the growth of our portfolio, although our Board of Directors may determine in certain cases to distribute these gains. We cannot assure you that we will achieve investment results or maintain a tax status that will allow or require any specified level of cash distributions or year-to-year increases in cash distributions.
Failure to deploy capital may reduce our return on equity.
In the past, we experienced delays in investing the proceeds of our initial public offering, which closed on August 29, 2001, as compared to the original timetable that we expected at the time of our initial public offering. Because of this slower pace of investing, we did not fully invest the net proceeds of our initial public offering until the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003. On September 30, 2004, we closed a second public offering of common stock providing net proceeds of approximately $24.4 million. Currently all of these proceeds have been invested, however, in the future, if we fail to invest our capital effectively, our return on equity may be negatively impacted, which could result in a decline in the market price of our common stock.
Prepayments by our portfolio companies could adversely impact our results of operations and reduce our return on equity.
In addition to risks associated with delays in investing our capital, we are also subject to the risk that investments that we make in our portfolio companies may be repaid prior to maturity. When this occurs, we will generally reinvest these proceeds in government securities, pending their future investment in new debt securities. These government securities will typically have substantially lower yields than the debt securities being prepaid and we could experience significant delays in reinvesting these amounts. As a result, our results of operations could be materially adversely affected if one or more of our portfolio companies elects to prepay amounts owed to us. Additionally, prepayments could negatively impact our return on equity, which could result in a decline in the market price of our common stock.
Provisions of our articles of incorporation and bylaws could deter takeover attempts and adversely impact the price of our shares.
Our articles of incorporation and bylaws and the Maryland General Corporation Law contain provisions that may have the effect of discouraging, delaying or making more difficult a change in control and preventing the removal of incumbent directors. The existence of these provisions may negatively impact the price of our shares and may discourage third-party bids. These provisions may reduce any premiums paid to you for our shares. Furthermore, we are subject to Section 3-602 of the Maryland General Corporation Law which governs business combinations with interested stockholders and could delay or prevent a change in control. In addition, our Board of Directors is elected in staggered terms which makes it more difficult for a hostile bidder to acquire control of us.
The market price of our shares may fluctuate significantly.
The market price and marketability of our shares may from time to time be significantly affected by numerous factors, including many over which we have no control and that may not be directly related to us. These factors include the following:
• price and volume fluctuations in the stock market from time to time, which are often unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies;
• significant volatility in the market price and trading volume of shares of RICs, business development companies or other companies in our sector, which is not necessarily related to the operating performance of these companies;
• changes in regulatory policies or tax guidelines, particularly with respect to RICs or business development companies;
• loss of BDC status;
• loss of RIC status;
• changes in our earnings or variations in our operating results;
• changes in the value of our portfolio of investments;
17
• any shortfall in our revenue or net income or any increase in losses from levels expected by securities analysts;
• departure of key personnel;
• operating performance of companies comparable to us;
• short-selling pressure with respect to our shares or business development companies generally;
• general economic trends and other external factors; and
• loss of a major funding source.
Fluctuations in the trading prices of our shares may adversely affect the liquidity of the trading market for our shares and, if we seek to raise capital through future equity financings, our ability to raise such equity capital.
Shares of closed-end investment companies frequently trade at a discount from net asset value.
Shares of closed-end investment companies frequently trade at a discount from net asset value. This characteristic of shares of closed-end investment companies is separate and distinct from the risk that our net asset value per share will decline. Although shares of our common stock have historically traded at a premium to net asset value, there can be no guarantee that they will continue to do so.
Sales of substantial amounts of our common stock in the public market may have an adverse effect on the market price of our common stock.
As of September 30, 2004 we had 11,278,510 shares of common stock outstanding, of which 10,369,224 were freely tradable without restriction. The remaining 909,286 shares were held by employees, officers and directors, most of which were purchased upon exercise of stock options and all of which may currently be resold publicly in compliance with the volume limitations and other restrictions of Rule 144 of the Securities Act. On April 10, 2003 we filed a registration statement to register for public resale 1,351,668 shares under our Amended and Restated 2001 Equity Incentive Plan (including the shares that have already been issued upon option exercises). Subsequent to the filing of this registration statement, all of these shares are now freely tradable without restriction, although certain of the options have not yet been granted and a portion of the options that have been granted are not yet vested and the shares underlying such options will, accordingly, not be eligible for resale until vested. Sales of substantial amounts of our common stock in the public market, pursuant to such registration, under Rule 144 or otherwise, or the availability of such shares for sale, could adversely affect the prevailing market prices for our common stock. If this occurs, it could impair our ability to raise additional capital through the sale of equity securities should we desire to do so.
Our engagement of Gladstone Management Corporation could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
Effective October 1, 2004, we engaged our affiliate, Gladstone Management Corporation, as our external investment adviser and we transitioned from being an internally managed company to an externally managed one. Under the terms of our advisory agreement with Gladstone Management, we are required to pay Gladstone Management an annual advisory fee of 1.25% of our total assets and an annual administrative fee of 0.75% of our total assets. Under the terms of the advisory agreement, we will continue to pay direct expenses including, but not limited to, directors fees, legal and accounting fees, and stockholder related expenses. It is possible that the transition to external management may increase our operating expenses, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. For additional information, see “Business—External Investment Adviser.”
18
Available Information:
Copies of our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments, if any, to those reports filed pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act are available free of charge through our website at www.GladstoneCapital.com. A request for any of these reports may also be submitted to us by writing: Corporate Secretary, Gladstone Capital Corporation, 1616 Anderson Road, Suite 208, McLean, VA 22102. The public may read and copy materials that we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20549. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC also maintains a website that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC at http://www.sec.gov.
Item 2. Properties
We do not own any real estate or other physical properties materially important to our operation. Our headquarters are located in McLean, Virginia where we occupy our office space pursuant to a license agreement that expired on October 31, 2004. Subsequent to October 31, 2004, we occupy our McLean, Virginia office space pursuant to a month to month basis license agreement. We also lease office space in New York City pursuant to a service agreement that expires on August 31, 2005 and in Chicago, Illinois pursuant to a service agreement that expires on June 30, 2005. Effective October 1, 2004, Gladstone Management Corporation was assigned all of the outstanding leases for each of these facilities and we continue to occupy these premises pursuant to our investment advisory and administrative agreement with Gladstone Management Corporation.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
We are not currently subject to any material legal proceedings, nor, to our knowledge, is any material legal proceeding threatened against us.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004.
19
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Our common stock is traded on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol “GLAD.” The following table reflects, by quarter, the high and low closing prices per share of our common stock on the Nasdaq National Market for each fiscal quarter during the last two fiscal years.
|
|
|
Quarter |
|
High |
|
Low |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
FY 2004 |
|
09/30/04 |
|
$ |
23.71 |
|
$ |
20.05 |
|
|
|
|
06/30/04 |
|
22.55 |
|
19.16 |
|
||
|
|
|
03/31/04 |
|
23.50 |
|
21.34 |
|
||
|
|
|
12/31/03 |
|
22.84 |
|
19.55 |
|
||
|
FY 2003 |
|
09/30/03 |
|
20.52 |
|
18.76 |
|
||
|
|
|
06/30/03 |
|
20.50 |
|
16.25 |
|
||
|
|
|
03/31/03 |
|
16.78 |
|
15.55 |
|
||
|
|
|
12/31/02 |
|
17.00 |
|
14.90 |
|
||
As of November 18, 2004, there were approximately 12,000 beneficial owners of our Common Stock.
Dividends
We currently intend to distribute in the form of cash dividends a minimum of 90% of our ordinary income and short-term capital gains, if any, on a quarterly basis to our stockholders. For fiscal year 2003, dividends were declared and paid quarterly. At the beginning of fiscal year 2004, dividends were declared quarterly but paid monthly. Amounts presented for each fiscal quarter of 2004 represent the cumulative amount of the dividends declared for the months composing such quarter. The following table reflects, by quarter, the dividends per share that we have declared on our common stock for each quarter of the last two fiscal years:
|
|
|
Quarter |
|
Cash Dividend |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2004 |
|
09/30/04 |
|
$ |
0.360 |
|
|
|
|
06/30/04 |
|
0.345 |
|
|
|
|
|
03/31/04 |
|
0.330 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/31/03 |
|
0.330 |
|
|
|
FY 2003 |
|
09/30/03 |
|
0.330 |
|
|
|
|
|
06/30/03 |
|
0.290 |
|
|
|
|
|
03/31/03 |
|
0.250 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/31/02 |
|
0.230 |
|
|
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
There were no unregistered sales of securities during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004.
20
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
The following selected financial data for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 are derived from our consolidated financial statements which have been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, independent accountants. The following selected financial data for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002 and the period ended September 30, 2001 are derived from our consolidated financial statements which have been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, independent accountants. The data should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included elsewhere in this report.
GLADSTONE CAPITAL CORPORATION
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
Year Ended |
|
Year Ended |
|
Period May 30,2001 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Total Investment Income |
|
$ |
20,395,968 |
|
$ |
15,154,874 |
|
$ |
10,455,703 |
|
$ |
394,855 |
|
|
Total Expenses |
|
$ |
7,103,193 |
|
$ |
3,858,953 |
|
$ |
2,839,102 |
|
$ |
487,499 |
|
|
Net Investment Income (Loss) |
|
$ |
13,292,775 |
|
$ |
11,295,921 |
|
$ |
7,616,601 |
|
$ |
(92,644 |
) |
|
Net Increase (Decrease) in Stockholders’ Equity Resulting from Operations |
|
$ |
10,570,290 |
|
$ |
11,073,581 |
|
$ |
7,616,601 |
|
$ |
(92,644 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Per Share Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Net Increase (Decrease) in Stockholders’ Equity Resulting from Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Basic |
|
$ |
1.05 |
|
$ |
1.10 |
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
1.02 |
|
$ |
1.09 |
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
|
Cash Distributions Declared per Share |
|
$ |
1.365 |
|
$ |
1.10 |
|
$ |
0.81 |
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Balance Sheet Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
215,333,727 |
|
$ |
214,566,663 |
|
$ |
172,922,039 |
|
$ |
132,205,486 |
|
|
Total Shareholders’ Equity |
|
$ |
152,226,655 |
|
$ |
130,802,382 |
|
$ |
130,663,273 |
|
$ |
131,249,144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Other Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Number of Portfolio Companies at Period End |
|
16 |
|
11 |
|
7 |
|
NONE |
|
||||
|
Principal Amount of Loan Originations (1) |
|
$ |
86,267,500 |
|
$ |
47,011,278 |
|
$ |
97,705,054 |
|
NONE |
|
|
|
Principal Amount of Loan Repayments (1) |
|
$ |
47,158,995 |
|
$ |
18,005,827 |
|
$ |
18,387,191 |
|
NONE |
|
|
|
Total Return (2) |
|
24.40 |
% |
21.74 |
% |
9.60 |
% |
7.60 |
% |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Weighted Average Yield on Investments (3): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
With PIK Interest (4) |
|
13.78 |
% |
13.86 |
% |
14.79 |
% |
N/A |
|
||||
|
Without PIK Interest (4) |
|
13.44 |
% |
13.14 |
% |
13.82 |
% |
N/A |
|
||||
(1) Includes all originations/prepayments related to a line of credit to one of our portfolio companies during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002.
(2) For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004, the total return equals the increase of the ending market value over the beginning market value plus monthly dividends divided by the monthly beginning market value. For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003 and prior periods, total return equals the increase of the ending market value over the beginning market value, plus distributions, divided by the beginning market value. The return for 2001 has not been annualized.
(3) Weighted average yield on investments equals interest income on investments divided by the average investment balance throughout the year.
(4) Refer to Note 2 of the “Notes to Financial Statements” for an explanation of PIK, or “Paid-in-Kind,” interest.
21
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and the notes thereto contained elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
All statements contained herein, other than historical facts, may constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These statements may relate to, among other things, future events or our future performance or financial condition. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “might,” “believe,” “will,” “provided,” “anticipate,” “future,” “could,” “growth,” “plan,” “intend,” “expect,” “should,” “would,” “if,” “seek,” “possible,” “potential”, “likely” or the negative of such terms or comparable terminology. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, among others: (1) adverse changes in interest rates; (2) our failure or inability to establish or maintain referral arrangements with leveraged buyout funds and venture capital funds to generate loan opportunities; (3) the loss of one or more of our executive officers, in particular David Gladstone, Terry Lee Brubaker, or George Stelljes III; (4) our inability to maintain a credit facility on terms reasonably acceptable to us, if at all; (5) our inability to successfully securitize our loan portfolio on terms reasonably acceptable to us, if at all; (6) the decision of our competitors to aggressively seek to make senior and subordinated loans to small and medium-sized businesses on terms more favorable than we intend to provide; and (7) those factors described in the “Risk Factors” section of this Form 10-K. We caution readers not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements, which are made pursuant to the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act on 1995 and, as such, speak only as of the date made. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, after the date of this Form 10-K.
OVERVIEW
We were incorporated under the General Corporation Laws of the State of Maryland on May 30, 2001. Our investment objectives are to achieve a high level of current income by investing in debt securities, consisting primarily of senior notes, senior subordinated notes and junior subordinated notes, of established private businesses that are backed by leveraged buyout funds, venture capital funds or others, with a particular emphasis on senior subordinated notes. In addition, we may acquire existing loans that meet this profile from leveraged buyout funds, venture capital funds and others. We also seek to provide our stockholders with long-term capital growth through the appreciation in the value of warrants or other equity instruments that we may receive when we make loans. We operate as a closed-end, non-diversified management investment company, and have elected to be treated as a business development company under the 1940 Act.
We seek out small and medium-sized businesses that meet certain criteria, including (1) the potential for growth in cash flow, (2) adequate assets for loan collateral, (3) experienced management teams with a significant ownership interest in the borrower, (4) profitable operations based on the borrower’s cash flow, (5) reasonable capitalization of the borrower (usually by leveraged buyout funds or venture capital funds) and (6) the potential to realize appreciation and gain liquidity in our equity position, if any. We anticipate that liquidity in our equity position will be achieved through a merger or acquisition of the borrower, a public offering by the borrower or by exercise of our right to require the borrower to buy back its warrants. We lend to borrowers that need funds to finance growth, restructure their balance sheets or effect a change of control.
Our loans typically range from $5 million to $15 million, mature in no more than seven years and accrue interest at a fixed or variable rate that exceeds the prime rate. A number of our loans have a provision that calls for some portion of the interest payments to be deferred and added to the principal balance so that the interest is paid, together with the principal, at maturity. This form of deferred interest is often called “paid-in-kind” (or “PIK”) interest, and, when earned, we record PIK interest as interest income and add the PIK interest to the principal balance of the loans.
Because our loans will generally be subordinated debt of private companies who typically cannot or will not expend the resources to have their debt securities rated by a credit rating agency, we expect that most, if not all, of the debt securities we acquire will be unrated. We cannot accurately predict what ratings these loans might receive if they were in fact rated, and therefore we cannot determine whether or not they could be considered to be “investment grade” quality.
22
To the extent possible, our loans generally are collateralized by a security interest in the borrower’s assets. Interest payments are generally made monthly or quarterly (except to the extent of any PIK interest) with amortization of principal generally being deferred for several years. The principal amount of the loans and any accrued but unpaid interest generally become due at maturity at five to seven years. When we receive a warrant to purchase stock in a borrower in connection with a loan, the warrant will typically have an exercise price equal to the fair value of the portfolio company’s common stock at the time of the loan and entitle us to purchase a modest percentage of the borrower’s stock.
In addition, as a business development company under the 1940 Act, we are required to make available significant managerial assistance to our portfolio companies. Prior to the externalization of our management on October 1, 2004, we provided these services, for which we receive fees, through our wholly-owned subsidiary, Gladstone Capital Advisers, Inc. Upon the externalization of our management on October 1, 2004, our investment adviser, Gladstone Management, began to provide these services on our behalf and as such will receive the fees for these services which will then be credited against the management advisory fee. The fees for these services are typically paid in part at the time a prospective portfolio company signs a non-binding term sheet with us, with the remainder paid at the closing of the investment. These fees are generally non-recurring, however in some instances they may have a recurring component. The specific services we provide vary by portfolio company, but generally consist of reviewing existing credit facilities, arranging bank financing, arranging equity financing, structuring financing from multiple lenders, structuring financing from equity investors, restructuring existing loans, raising equity and debt capital, closely monitoring the operations of the borrower, participating in its board and management meetings, being available for consultation with its officers and providing general organizational and financial guidance. Historically, we have record fees for these services as managerial assistance fee revenue for the periods in which these fees are earned by us.
Prior to making an investment, we ordinarily enter into a non-binding term sheet with the potential borrower. These non-binding term sheets are generally subject to a number of conditions, including but not limited to the satisfactory completion of our due diligence investigations of the potential borrower’s business and reaching agreement on the legal documentation for the loan. Typically, upon execution of the non-binding term sheet, the potential borrower pays us a non-refundable fee for our services rendered through the date of the non-binding term sheet. We have historically recognized this as management fee revenue upon execution of the non-binding term sheet.
In the event that we expend significant effort in considering and negotiating a potential investment that ultimately is not consummated, we generally will seek reimbursement from the proposed borrower for our reasonable expenses incurred in connection with the proposed transaction. Any amounts collected for expenses incurred by Gladstone Management in connection with unconsummated investments will be reimbursed to Gladstone Management. Amounts collected for these expenses incurred by us will be reimbursed to us and will be recognized as “other income” in the period in which such reimbursement is received. Also, in the event that we have incurred significant legal fees in connection with the transaction, we will typically seek reimbursement for these expenses from the proposed borrower. However, there can be no guarantee that we will be successful in collecting any such reimbursements.
The only significant continuing revenue associated with the investments we have already closed is interest income and, potentially, capital gains realized in connection with the liquidation of any associated equity interest (e.g., warrants).
The fiscal year ended September 30, 2004 saw signs of improvement in the economy as well as an influx of low interest rate capital into the debt markets as compare to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003. As evidence of this improvement, several of our portfolio companies saw an increase in their earnings and as such have repaid their entire outstanding loan balances earlier than the scheduled contractual maturity dates. During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004, we saw four loan investments and one syndicated loan investment repay ahead of maturity date for an aggregate return of capital of approximately $36.5 million. On September 30, 2004 we closed a second public offering of common stock which provided us net proceeds of approximately $24.4 million. Subsequent to September 30, 2004, two loan investments repaid ahead of contractual maturity and one syndicated loan investment was sold for an aggregate return of capital of approximately $25.3 million. Since our initial public offering in August 2001, we have made 39 different loans to or purchased syndicated participations in, or investments in, 23 companies for a total of approximately $219.1 million.
23
We are steadily working toward the consummation of more investments, both loan origination and syndicated investments. These prospective loans are subject to, among other things, the satisfactory completion of our due diligence investigation of each borrower, acceptance of terms and structure and attainment of necessary consents. With respect to each prospective loan, we will only agree to provide the loan if, among other things, the results of our due diligence investigations are satisfactory, the terms and conditions of the loan are acceptable and all necessary consents are received. Our management has initiated its due diligence investigations of the potential borrowers, however we cannot assure you that we will not discover facts in the course of completing our due diligence that would render a particular investment imprudent or that any of these loans will actually be made.
External Adviser
In July 2003, we entered into an expense sharing arrangement with Gladstone Management Corporation (“Gladstone Management”), a registered investment adviser that serves as the external adviser to Gladstone Commercial Corporation, a real estate investment trust affiliated with us. Under this expense sharing arrangement, Gladstone Management reimbursed Gladstone Capital Advisers for a portion of our total payroll and benefits expenses (based on the percentage of total hours worked by each of our employees on Gladstone Commercial matters). Gladstone Management also reimbursed Gladstone Capital Advisers for its pro rata portion of all other general expenses (based on the percentage of total hours worked by all of our employees on Gladstone Commercial matters). Gladstone Management further passed its share of these expenses along to Gladstone Commercial under a separate advisory agreement. As a result of this expense sharing arrangement, certain of our expenses, such as rent and insurance, declined during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004. Following our engagement of Gladstone Management on October 1, 2004, the first day of our 2005 fiscal year, Gladstone Management now directly employs all of our personnel and pays its payroll, benefits, and general expenses directly. Thus, the expense sharing arrangement between Gladstone Capital Advisers and Gladstone Management terminated upon the externalization of our management on October 1, 2004.
Effective October 1, 2004, pursuant to our advisory agreement with Gladstone Management, we pay Gladstone Management an annual advisory fee of 1.25% of our total assets (as reduced by cash and cash equivalents pledged to creditors), payable in quarterly increments of 0.3125%, and an annual administrative fee of 0.75% of our total assets (as reduced by cash and cash equivalents pledged to creditors), payable in quarterly increments of 0.1875%. We continue to pay direct expenses including, but not limited to, directors fees, legal and accounting fees, and stockholder related expenses.
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported consolidated amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and revenues and expenses during the periods reported. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates. Our accounting policies are more fully described in the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” contained elsewhere in this report. We have identified our investment valuation process, tax status and revenue recognition as our most critical accounting policies.
Investment Valuation
The most significant estimate inherent in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements is the valuation of investments and the related amounts of unrealized appreciation and depreciation of investments recorded.
24
General Valuation Policy: We value our investment portfolio each quarter. We carry our investments at fair value, as determined in good faith by our board of directors. Securities that are publicly traded, if any, are valued at the closing price of the exchange or securities market on which they are listed on the valuation date. Securities which are not traded on a public exchange or securities market, but for which a limited market exists, such as participations in syndicated loans, are valued at the indicative bid price offered by the syndication agent on the valuation date.
Debt and equity securities that are not publicly traded and for which a limited market does not exist (or for which we have various degrees of trading restrictions) are valued at fair value as determined in good faith by our board of directors. In making the good faith determination of the value of these securities, we start with the cost basis of the security, which includes the amortized original issue discount, and PIK interest, if any. We then apply the methods set out below in “Valuation Methods.” Members of our portfolio management team prepare the valuations of our investments in portfolio companies using the most recent portfolio company financial statements and forecasts. These individuals also consult with portfolio company senior management to obtain further updates on the portfolio company’s performance, including information such as industry trends, new product development, and other operational issues. Due to the uncertainty inherent in the valuation process, such estimates of fair value may differ significantly from the values that would have been obtained had a ready market for the securities existed, and the differences could be material. Additionally, changes in the market environment and other events that may occur over the life of the investments may cause the gains or losses ultimately realized on these investments to be different than the valuations currently assigned. No single standard for determining fair value in good faith exists since fair value depends upon circumstances of each individual case. In general, fair value is the amount that we might reasonably expect to receive upon the current sale of the security.
As of March 31, 2003, we engaged Standard & Poor’s Loan Evaluation Service (S&P) to help evaluate the value of the majority of our loan securities (other than those which are publicly traded or for which a limited market exists, as described above). Since June 30, 2003, our S&P engagement includes evaluations on success fees (conditional interest included in some loan securities). We and S&P only evaluate the value of a success fee if the probability of receiving the success fee on a given loan is above 6-8%, a threshold of significance, in which case a value is assigned. Upon completing our collection of data with respect to the investments (including the information described under “Credit Information,” the risk ratings of the loans described under “Loan Grading and Risk Rating” and the factors described under “Valuation Methods”), this valuation data is presented to S&P. S&P makes its independent assessment of the data that we have assembled and assesses its own data to determine market values for the securities. With regard to its work, S&P has issued the following paragraph:
S&P provides evaluated price opinions which are reflective of what S&P believes the bid side of the market would be for each loan after careful review and analysis of descriptive, market and credit information. Each price reflects S&P’s best judgment based upon careful examination of a variety of market factors. Because of fluctuation in the market and in other factors beyond its control, S&P cannot guarantee these evaluations. The evaluations reflect the market prices, or estimates thereof, on the date specified. The prices are based on comparable market prices for similar securities. Market information has been obtained from reputable secondary market sources. Although these sources are considered reliable, S&P cannot guarantee their accuracy.
25
With our assessment and S&P value estimates as a backdrop, our board of directors votes to accept or not accept the analyses and values recommended by management and S&P. At September 30, 2004 and September 30, 2003, the board of directors elected to accept the valuations recommended by S&P on those loans as denoted on the Schedule of Investments as of September 30, 2004 and September 30, 2003 in our consolidated financial statements.
Because there is a delay between when we close a loan and when the loan can be evaluated by S&P, new loans are not valued immediately by S&P; rather, the board of directors makes its own determination about the value of these loans in accordance with our valuation policy. Because S&P does not provide values for mortgage loans or equity securities, our board of directors also determines the fair value of these investments using our valuation policy without the input of S&P.
Credit Information: We monitor a wide variety of key credit statistics that provide information regarding our portfolio companies to help us assess credit quality and portfolio performance. We require our portfolio companies to provide annual audited and either monthly or quarterly unaudited financial statements. Using these statements, we calculate and evaluate the credit statistics. For purposes of analyzing the financial performance of our portfolio companies, we may make certain adjustments to their cash flow statements to reflect the pro forma results of a company consistent with a change of control transaction, to reflect anticipated cost savings resulting from a merger or restructuring, costs related to new product development, compensation to previous owners, and other acquisition or restructuring related items. For those investments for which S&P prepares valuation recommendations, we provide this credit information to S&P for its use in preparing its recommendations. For those investments for which S&P does not prepare valuation recommendations, management uses this credit information in connection with its preparation of valuation recommendations.
Loan Grading and Risk Rating: As part of our valuation procedures we risk rate all of our loans. Our risk rating system uses a scale of 0 to 10. This system is used to estimate the probability of default on our debt securities and the probability of loss if there is a default. These types of systems are referred to as risk rating systems and are used by banks and rating agencies. The risk rating system covers both qualitative and quantitative aspects of the business and the securities we hold. For those investments for which S&P prepares valuation recommendations, we compile this information and provide it to S&P for its consideration in determining its valuation recommendations. For those investments for which S&P does not prepare valuation recommendations, management uses this information to develop valuation recommendations.
We seek to have our risk rating system mirror the risk rating systems of major risk rating organizations such as those provided by nationally recognized statistical rating organizations (“NRSRO”) as defined in Rule 2a-7 under the 1940 Act. While we seek to mirror the NRSRO systems, we cannot provide any assurance that our risk rating system provides the same risk rating as a NRSRO. The following chart is an estimate of the relationship of our risk rating system to the designations used by two NRSROs as they risk rate debt securities of major companies. Because we have established our system to rate debt securities of companies that are unrated by any NRSRO there can be no assurance that the correlation to the NRSRO set out below is accurate. It is our understanding that most debt securities of middle market companies do not exceed the grade of BBB on a NRSRO scale; so there would be no debt securities in the middle market that would meet the definition of AAA, AA or A. Therefore, our scale begins with the designation BBB as the best risk rating.
|
Company’s |
|
First |
|
Second |
|
Gladstone Capital’s Description(a) |
|
|
>10 |
|
Baa2 |
|
BBB |
|
Probability of Default (PD) during the next ten years is 4% and the Expected Loss (EL) is 1% or less |
|
|
10 |
|
Baa3 |
|
BBB- |
|
PD is 5% and the EL is 1% to 2% |
|
|
9 |
|
Ba1 |
|
BB+ |
|
PD is 10% and the EL is 2% to 3% |
|
|
8 |
|
Ba2 |
|
BB |
|
PD is 16% and the EL is 3% to 4% |
|
|
7 |
|
Ba3 |
|
BB- |
|
PD is 17.8% and the EL is 4% to 5% |
|
|
6 |
|
B1 |
|
B+ |
|
PD is 22.0% and the EL is 5% to 6.5% |
|
|
5 |
|
B2 |
|
B |
|
PD is 25% and the EL is 6.5% to 8% |
|
|
4 |
|
B3 |
|
B- |
|
PD is 27% and the EL is 8% to 10% |
|
|
3 |
|
Caa1 |
|
CCC+ |
|
PD is 30% and the EL is 10.0% to 13.3% |
|
|
2 |
|
Caa2 |
|
CCC |
|
PD is 35% and the EL is 13.3% to 16.7% |
|
|
1 |
|
Caa3 |
|
CC |
|
PD is 65% and the EL is 16.7% to 20% |
|
|
0 |
|
N/a |
|
D |
|
PD is 85% or there is a Payment Default: and the EL is greater than 20% |
|
(a) the default rates set here are for a ten year term debt, if the company’s debt security is less than ten years then the probability of default is adjusted to a lower percentage for the shorter period which may move the security higher on the company’s risk rating scale.
26
The above scale gives an indication of the probability of default and the magnitude of the loss if there is a default. At September 30, 2003, the average debt security was risk rated 7.8 for all debt securities and the weighted average risk rating was 7.6 for all debt securities. The following table lists the risk ratings for all of the debt securities by quarter during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004:
|
Rating |
|
December 31, 2003 |
|
March 31, 2004 |
|
June 30, 2004 |
|
September 30, 2004 |
|
|
Average |
|
7.8 |
|
7.7 |
|
7.4 |
|
7.6 |
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
7.6 |
|
7.7 |
|
7.3 |
|
7.6 |
|
|
Highest |
|
9.0 |
|
9.0 |
|
9.0 |
|
9.0 |
|
|
Lowest |
|
7.0 |
|
6.0 |
|
5.0 |
|
5.0 |
|
The above scale gives an indication of the probability of default and the magnitude of the loss if there is a default. Our policy is to stop accruing interest on an investment if we determine that interest is no longer collectible. To date we have not placed any investments on non-accrual. At September 30, 2004 and September 30, 2003, no payments were past due on any of our debt securities. We do not risk rate our equity securities.
Valuation Methods: For debt securities, we first determine if the debt security is publicly traded (i.e., if it is listed on an exchange or securities market). If it is publicly traded, then we determine the value based on the closing price for the security on the exchange or securities market on which it is listed on the valuation date. If the security is not publicly traded, but a limited market for the security exists, such as for a participation in a syndicated loan, then we value it at the indicative bid price offered by the syndication agent on the valuation date. At September 30, 2004, we determined that none of the debt securities in our portfolio were publicly traded and that there was a limited market for five debt securities in our portfolio. At September 20, 2003, there was no market for any of the debt securities in our portfolio.
For debt securities that are not publicly traded and for which there is no market, we begin with the risk rating designation of the security described above. Using the risk rating designation above, we seek to determine the value of the security as if we intended to sell the security in a current sale. To determine the current sale price of the security, we consider some or all of the following factors:
• financial standing of the issuer of the security;
• comparison of the business and financial plan of the issuer with actual results;
• the cost of the security;
• the size of the security held as it relates to the liquidity of the market for such securities;
• contractual restrictions on the disposition of the security;
• pending public offering of the issuer of the security;
• pending reorganization activity affecting the issuer such as mergers or debt restructuring;
• reported prices of similar securities of the issuer or comparable issuers;
• ability of the issuer to obtain needed financing;
• changes in the economy affecting the issuer;
• recent purchases or sale of a security of the issuer;
• pricing by other buyers or sellers of similar securities;
• financial statements of the borrower;
• reports from portfolio company senior management and ownership;
• the type of security;
• cost at date of purchase;
• size of holding;
• discount from market value of unrestricted securities of the same class at the time of purchase;
• special reports prepared by analysts;
• information as to any transactions or offers with respect to the security;
• existence of merger proposals or tender offers affecting the securities;
• the collateral;
• the issuer’s ability to make payments;
27
• the current and forecasted earnings of the issuer;
• sales to third parties of similar securities;
• statistical ratios compared to lending standards;
• statistical ratios compared to other similar securities; and
• other pertinent factors.
For those debt securities for which S&P prepares valuation recommendations, we provide the foregoing information to S&P for its use in preparing its recommendations.
For convertible debt, equity, success fees or other equity-like securities, we first determine if there is any market for the security. If there is a market, then we determine the value based on the market prices for the security, even if that market is not robust. At September 30, 2004 and September 30, 2003 there was no market for any of the equity securities we owned. If there is no market for the equity securities, then we use the same information we would use for a debt security valuation described above, except risk-rating, as well as standard valuation techniques used by major valuation firms to value the equity securities of private companies. These valuation techniques consist of: discounted cash flow of the expected sale price in the future, valuation of the securities based on recent sales in comparable transactions, and a review of similar companies that are publicly traded and the market multiple of their equity securities. At September 30, 2004 we had $37,000 invested, at cost, in equity securities compared to our debt portfolio with a cost basis of $149,152,306.
At September 30, 2004, America’s Water Heater Rentals senior loan had an appreciation of $840,000 in its value as a result of the value applied to the success fee. Also, the value of our warrants of Finn Corporation had an appreciation of $437,984 at September 30, 2004. This aforementioned appreciation plus appreciation of $314,970 on certain other investments, for overall appreciation of $1,592,953, partially offsets total depreciation of $4,336,019, which was mainly composed of depreciation in our senior subordinated term debt investment in Finn Corporation (excluding the warrants) of $2,887,500, our senior subordinated term debt investment in Marcal Paper Mills, Inc. of $612,000, our senior term debt investment in Coyne International Enterprises of $392,516, and our senior term debt investment in Inca Metal Products Corporation of $250,693.
Tax Status
Federal Income Taxes
We intend to continue to qualify for treatment as a RIC under Subtitle A, Chapter 1 of Subchapter M of the Code. As a RIC, we are not subject to federal income tax on the portion of our taxable income and gains distributed to stockholders. To qualify as a RIC, we are required to distribute to stockholders at least 90% of investment company taxable income, as defined by the Code. We have a policy to pay out as a dividend up to 100% of that amount.
Revenue Recognition
Interest Income Recognition
Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis to the extent that such amounts are expected to be collected. We will stop accruing interest on investments when it is determined that interest is no longer collectible. Conditional interest or a success fee is recorded when earned upon full repayment of a loan investment.
Payment in Kind Interest
We also have some loans in our portfolio which contain a payment in kind (“PIK”) provision. The PIK interest, computed at the contractual rate specified in each loan agreement, is added to the principal balance of the loan and recorded as interest income. To maintain our status as a RIC, this non-cash source of income must be paid out to stockholders in the form of dividends, even though we have not yet collected the cash.
28
Managerial Assistance Fees
The 1940 Act requires that a business development company make available managerial assistance to its portfolio companies. Prior to October 1, 2004, we provided managerial assistance to our portfolio companies in connection with our investments through our wholly-owned subsidiary, Gladstone Capital Advisers, Inc. Effective October 1, 2004, we began providing these services through our external adviser, Gladstone Management. We generally receive fees for our managerial assistance services. These fees are normally paid at the closing of our investments in our portfolio companies, are generally non-recurring and are recognized as revenue when earned. The managerial assistance services we provide vary by investment, but generally consist of reviewing existing credit facilities, arranging bank financing, arranging equity financing, structuring financing from multiple lenders, structuring financing from equity investors, restructuring existing loans, raising equity and debt capital, closely monitoring the operations of the borrower, participating in its board and management meetings, being available for consultation with its officers and providing general organizational and financial guidance, which concludes upon closing of the loan. Any services of this nature subsequent to the closing would generally generate a separate fee at the time of completion. From time to time, we are invited to participate as a co-lender in a transaction. In the event that we do not provide significant managerial assistance services in connection with our investment, loan fees paid to us in such situations are deferred and amortized over the life of the loan. After October 1, 2004 our adviser, Gladstone Management, provides managerial assistance and receives the managerial assistance fees which are credited to the investment advisory fees due to the investment adviser.
29
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
COMPARISON OF THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2004 AND SEPTEMBER 30, 2003
Operating Income
Operating income for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004 was $20.4 million as compared to $15.2 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003. This increase is primarily a result of a rise in interest income from an increase of approximately $86.3 million of new investments from the prior year and the collection of approximately $1.8 million of exit fees upon the full repayment of three portfolio company investments.
Interest income from our investments in debt securities of private companies was approximately $18.2 million, including $553,000 of PIK interest, for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004 as compared to $13.2 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003, including $781,000 of PIK interest. This increase was primarily the result of approximately $86.3 million of new investments for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004 and the collection of $1.8 million of exit fees upon the full repayment of three portfolio company investments. The decrease in PIK income for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004 was the result of scheduled principal repayments for one loan containing the PIK provision.
The weighted average yield on our portfolio for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004 was 13.44% (without giving effect to PIK interest) and 13.78% (after giving effect to PIK interest). The weighted average yield on our portfolio for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003 was 13.14% (without giving effect to PIK interest) and 13.86% (after giving effect to PIK interest). The yields were computed based on the cost value of the investment portfolios.
Interest income from invested cash and cash equivalents for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004 was approximately $84,000, as compared to approximately $466,000 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003. This decrease was primarily caused by a decrease in cash balances as a result of $86.3 million of new investments.
For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004, we recorded approximately $444,000 in interest income from loans to our employees in connection with the exercise of employee stock options, as compared to approximately $438,000 in interest income from such loans for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003. During the year ended September 30, 2004, one loan was repaid in full and two new loans were entered into as a result of employee stock option exercises.
Managerial assistance fees were approximately $1.1 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004 and $886,000 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003. Fee income for each of the fiscal years ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 consists primarily of managerial assistance fees received in connection with investments we closed during the respective fiscal year. During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004, the increase was mainly attributable to the closing of the Gamill, Inc., Woven Electronics Corp., Benetech, Inc. Mistras Holdings Corp. ($1.0 million investment), A and G, Inc. and Allied Extruders, Inc. investments, in the approximate aggregate amount of $52.8 million, as compared to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003 closings of Wingstop Restaurants, America’s Water Heater Rentals, Fugate and Associates, Mistras Holdings Corp. ($15.0 million investment), and ARI Holdings Inc. investments in the approximate aggregate amount of $47.0 million.
Other income was approximately $573,000 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004 and $117,000 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003. For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004, this amount was comprised of $545,000 of early principal payment penalty fees, $17,000 in waiver fees for certain loan covenants, and $11,000 in up-front fees for a proposed investment. For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003, this amount was comprised of $60,000 in waiver fees for certain loan covenants, $30,000 in early principal payment penalty fees, $25,000 in up-front fees for a proposed investment and $2,000 in other income.
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004 were approximately $7.1 million, compared to approximately $3.9 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003. This increase was primarily a result of the increase in salaries and benefits, professional fees, directors’ fees, financing fees incurred in connection with the credit line facility we established in fiscal year 2003 and the line of credit entered into in June 2004, as well as interest and loan servicing expenses.
30
Salaries and benefits for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004 were approximately $2.6 million, as compared to approximately $2.0 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003. The primary reason for the increase was the Board of Directors declaration of an $800,000 performance based bonus during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004. Although during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004, salaries and benefits were allocated in accordance with an expense sharing arrangement with Gladstone Management Corporation that allocated expenses to Gladstone Management Corporation based on each employee’s time spent on Gladstone Commercial Corporation’s matters, no portion of this bonus was allocated to Gladstone Management Corporation as it was solely attributable to the performance of Gladstone Capital Corporation. Without giving effect to the bonus, salaries and benefits slightly decreased as compared to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003. Although employee head count increased from the prior fiscal year, the cost of the increase was offset by the savings attributable to the expense sharing arrangement with Gladstone Management Corporation. As a result of the externalization of our management, effective October 1, 2004, we ceased incurring salaries and benefits expenses as our personnel are all now directly employed by Gladstone Management, which pays these expenses directly. In connection with this transition, effective October 1, 2004, we are obligated to make payments to Gladstone Management pursuant to the terms of an investment advisory and administrative agreement with Gladstone Management.
Rent expense for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004 was approximately $139,000 as compared to $210,000 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003. This decrease in rent was due to the expense sharing arrangement with Gladstone Management, which allocated general expenses to Gladstone Management based on the ratio of all employees’ time spent of Gladstone Commercial Corporation’s matters to total time spent. As a result of the externalization of our management, effective October 1, 2004, we ceased incurring rent expense as we assigned our obligations under our lease to Gladstone Management, which pays these expenses directly. In connection with this transition, effective October 1, 2004, we are obligated to make payments to Gladstone Management pursuant to the terms of the investment advisory agreement with Gladstone Management.
Professional fees, consisting primarily of legal and audit fees, for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004 were approximately $580,000 as compared to approximately $410,000 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003. This increase is primarily due to an increase in legal fees associated with various SEC filings, certain non-reimbursable due diligence fees incurred in connection with syndicated investment participations, and other general corporate matters.
Directors’ fees for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004 were approximately $112,000, as compared to approximately $74,000 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003. The increase is due to the addition of two new directors during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004, as well as an increase in the number of meetings during the year.
General insurance expense for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004 was approximately $259,000 as compared to $276,000 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003. Although overall premiums have increased, the general insurance expense decreased for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004 as compared to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003 as a result of the expense sharing arrangement with Gladstone Management which allocated general expenses to Gladstone Management based on a ratio of all employees’ time spent of Gladstone Commercial Corporation’s matter to total time spent. As a result of the externalization of our management, effective October 1, 2004, we ceased incurring general insurance expenses and Gladstone Management now pays these expenses directly. However, we will continue to incur insurance expense in connection with our directors and officers insurance policy. In connection with this transition, effective October 1, 2004, we are obligated to make payments to Gladstone Management pursuant to the terms of the investment advisory agreement with Gladstone Management.
Stockholder related costs for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004 were approximately $140,000 as compared to $143,000 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003. These costs include printing charges related to annual reports and proxy solicitations as well as other stockholder required communications such as the electronic filings of SEC reports.
Financing fees for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004 were approximately $1.4 million compared to financing fees for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003 of approximately $222,000. These fees represent the amortization of certain capitalized costs in connection with establishing the lines of credit. In May 2003, we entered into a warehouse line of credit with CIBC World Markets Inc. The interest of CIBC World Markets Inc. was subsequently assigned to Deutsche Bank AG in September 2004. As a result of this transaction, approximately $1.2 million of capitalized fees were expensed. Some of the increase in financing fees is a result of the incurrence of financing fees related to this line of credit for the full fiscal year ended September 30, 2004, as compared to a shorter period of time during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003. Monthly fees associated with the line of credit are included in these financing fees. We also entered into an operating line of credit with Branch Banking and Trust Company (“BB&T”) in June 2004, and likewise incurred certain transaction costs which are amortized into financing fees. The fiscal year ended September 30, 2003 was the first year in which these charges were incurred.
31
Interest expense for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004 was approximately $742,000 and was incurred mainly on our borrowings from our warehouse line of credit as well as our new operating line of credit. There was no interest expense incurred for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003 as there were no borrowings outstanding under our warehouse line of credit.
Loan servicing fees of approximately $502,000 were incurred for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004. These fees were incurred from July 12, 2004 through September 30, 2004 in connection with a loan servicing agreement between Gladstone Business Loan LLC and Gladstone Management Corporation, which became effective July 12, 2004. The loans in the portfolio were previously serviced under a similar agreement with Gladstone Capital Advisers Inc. and the fees were eliminated upon consolidation of the financial results.
General and administrative expenses, consisting primarily of office operations, travel and data communications, for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004 were approximately $702,000, as compared to approximately $507,000 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003. These increases were largely related to the recruiting and addition of several new employees, the expansion of our operations, as well as the disposal of inactive fixed assets, and an increase in depreciation due to the addition of new computers for new employees. Despite these increases, depreciation expense decreased overall due to the sale of all fixed assets to Gladstone Management on July 1, 2004 at net book value, and as such no depreciation was recorded for the last fiscal quarter of the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004. Certain general and administrative expenses were allocated in accordance with the expense sharing arrangement with Gladstone Management, which allocated general expense to Gladstone Management based on the ratio of all employees’ time spent on Gladstone Commercial Corporation matters which partially offset the increase in these general and administrative expenses. As a result of the externalization of our management, effective October 1, 2004, we ceased incurring certain general and administrative expenses and Gladstone Management now pays certain of these expenses directly. Certain general and administrative expenses, such as the backup service provider will continue to be incurred directly by us. In connection with this transition, effective October 1, 2004, we are obligated to make payments to Gladstone Management pursuant to the terms of the investment advisory agreement with Gladstone Management.
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments
During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004, we bought and sold shortly thereafter a $1.0 million investment in Metokote Corporation for a gain of $12,500.
As a result of the decline in fair market value of our interest rate cap agreement, we recorded net unrealized depreciation of approximately $214,000 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004. There were no derivatives in place during the previous fiscal year.
For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004 we recorded net unrealized depreciation on investments of approximately $2.5 million as compared to net unrealized depreciation of approximately $222,000 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003. The increase in net unrealized depreciation was mainly attributable to the valuation of our senior subordinated term debt investment in Finn Corporation (exclusive of the warrants). The increase is also due to the addition of nine new companies to the portfolio and the related valuations performed by S&P or the respective bid price as of the balance sheet valuation date by the syndication agent.
Net Increase in Stockholders’ Equity from Operations
We had a net increase in stockholders’ equity resulting from operations of approximately $10.6 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004. Based on a weighted-average of 10,101,341 (basic) and 10,344,388 (diluted) shares outstanding, our net increase in stockholders’ equity resulting from operations per common share for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003 was $1.05 (basic) and $1.02 (diluted).
We had a net increase in stockholders’ equity resulting from operations of approximately $11.1 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003. Based on a weighted-average of 10,072,677 (basic) and 10,188,488 (diluted) shares outstanding, our net increase in stockholders’ equity resulting from operations per common share for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003 was $1.10 (basic) and $1.09 (diluted).
32
COMPARISON OF THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2003 AND SEPTEMBER 30, 2002
Operating Income
Operating income for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003 was $15.2 million as compared to $10.5 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002. This increase is primarily a result of increased interest income from an increase in the amount of investments. These debt securities provide a higher yield than the short-term investment grade securities.
Interest income from our investments in debt securities of private companies was approximately $13.2 million, including $781,000 of PIK interest, for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003 as compared to $6.6 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002, including $462,000 of PIK interest. This increase was primarily the result of approximately $47.0 million of new investments for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003.
The weighted average yield on our portfolio for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003 was 13.14% (without giving effect to PIK interest) and 13.86% (after giving effect to PIK interest). The weighted average yield on our portfolio for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002 was 13.82% (without giving effect to PIK interest) and 14.79% (after giving effect to PIK interest). The yields were computed based on the cost value of the investment portfolios.
Interest income from invested cash and cash equivalents for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003 was approximately $466,000, as compared to approximately $1.6 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002. This decrease was primarily a result of $47.0 million of new investments for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003.
For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003, we recorded approximately $438,000 in interest income from loans to our employees in connection with the exercise of employee stock options, as compared to approximately $433,000 in interest income from such loans for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002. During the year ended September 30, 2003, one loan was repaid in full and a new loan was entered into as a result of an employee stock option exercise.
Managerial assistance fees were approximately $886,000 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003 and $1.7 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002. Fee income for each of the fiscal years ended September 30 consists primarily of managerial assistance fees received in connection with investments we closed during the respective fiscal year. During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003, we closed five new loans compared to eight during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002.
Other income was approximately $117,000 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003 and $131,000 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002. For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003, this amount was comprised of $60,000 in waiver fees for certain loan covenants, $30,000 in early principal payment penalty fees, $25,000 in up-front fees for a proposed investment and $2,000 in other income. For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002, this amount was comprised of approximately $81,000 in up-front fees received in connection with five proposed investments that ultimately were not consummated and approximately $50,000 in other fees.
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003 were approximately $3.9 million, compared to approximately $2.8 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002. This increase was primarily a result of the increase in personnel, new office space acquired in September 2002, increased operations and financing fees incurred in connection with the credit line facility we established in fiscal year 2003.
Salaries and benefits for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003 were approximately $2.0 million, as compared to approximately $1.4 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002. The primary reason for the increase was the hiring of additional employees during the year.
Rent expense for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003 was approximately $210,000 as compared to $125,000 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002. This increase is due to the new office space acquired in September 2002.
Professional fees, consisting primarily of legal and audit fees, for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003 were approximately $410,000 as compared to approximately $550,000 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002. This decrease is the result of a decline in legal fees during fiscal year 2003.
33
Directors fees for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003 were approximately $74,000, as compared to approximately $22,000 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002. The increase is due to the increase in the annual directors fees as well as the increase in the number of meetings during the year and the addition of new board members.
General insurance expense for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003 was approximately $276,000 as compared to $206,000 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002. The majority of this increase is due to an increase in directors’ and officers’ insurance premiums as insurance carriers have increased their premiums in the wake of the increase in high profile corporate fraud and mismanagement as well as the Sarbanes Oxley Act.
Stockholder related costs for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003 were approximately $143,000 as compared to $104,000 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002. These costs include printing charges related to annual reports and proxy solicitations as well as other stockholder required communications such as the electronic filings of SEC reports.
Financing fees for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003 were approximately $222,000. This is the first year in which these charges were incurred. These fees represent the related service fees associated with our line of credit, backup service and the amortization of deferred financing costs.
General and administrative expenses, consisting primarily of office operations, travel and data communications, for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003 were approximately $507,000, as compared to approximately $464,000 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002. These increases were largely related to new employees and the expansion of operations.
Net Increase in Stockholders’ Equity from Operations
We had a net increase in stockholders’ equity resulting from operations of approximately $11.1 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003. Based on a weighted-average of 10,072,677 (basic) and 10,188,488 (diluted) shares outstanding, our net increase in stockholders’ equity resulting from operations per common share for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003 was $1.10 (basic) and $1.09 (diluted).
For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002, we realized a net increase in stockholders’ equity resulting from operations of approximately $7.6 million. Based on a weighted-average of 10,064,900 (basic) and 10,166,752 (diluted) shares outstanding, our net increase in stockholders’ equity resulting from operations per common share for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002 was $0.76 (basic) and $0.75 (diluted).
34
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
At September 30, 2004, we had investments in debt securities, or loans to or syndicated participations in, sixteen private companies totaling approximately $149.2 million, including approximately $553,000 in accrued PIK interest. At September 30, 2003, we had investments in debt securities of, or loans to, eleven private companies, totaling approximately $109.5 million of total investment assets, including approximately $807,000 in accrued PIK interest. PIK interest is described in “Overview,” and is added to our carrying value of our investments.
In November 2003, we purchased a $1.0 million participation in a $55.0 million senior term loan to Burt’s Bees, Inc., a manufacturer of personal and household products.
In December 2003 we closed two loans with GQM Acquisition Corp. totaling $14.5 million and also containing a success fee provision. GQM Acquisition Corp conducts business as Gammill, Inc. and is the designer and assembler of quilting machines and accessories.
In November 2003, Kozy Shack Enterprises repaid $900,000 to fully settle its principal obligation.
In December 2003, we sold a $3.2 million principal portion of our Inca Metal Products Corp/Kingway Acquisition Inc./Clymer Acquisition Inc. investment. The remaining portion of this investment currently has a cost basis of $2.5 million.
During March 2004, we entered into a $14.5 million loan investment, which also contains a success fee provision, with Woven Electronics Corporation, which specializes in custom electrical cable assemblies and also purchased a $6.0 million participation investment with Medassets, Inc., a pharmaceutical and healthcare group purchasing organization (GPO).
In April 2004, we sold $4.6 million of our principal portions of our investments in Gammill, Inc. Our remaining investments in Gammill, subsequent to the sale, are $4.963 million and $4.75 million. Another portfolio company, Wingstop Restaurants International, Inc. repaid its $5,375,000 outstanding loan obligations in April 2004. Wingstop Restaurants International, Inc. also remitted related prepayment fees and an exit fee of $360,000 with its final payment.
During May 2004, we entered into a $6.5 million loan investment with Benetech Inc., which specializes in dust management systems for the coal and electric utility industries, purchased an additional $2.0 million participation investment with Medassets, Inc., and purchased a $10.0 million participation in Maidenform, Inc., a manufacturer of intimate apparel.
During June 2004, we extended an additional $1.0 million loan, which also contains a success fee provision, to Mistras Holdings Corp. and also invested in a $12.25 million loan to A and G, Inc. a manufacturer of activewear products. We also purchased an $8.0 million participation in MD Beauty, Inc., a maker of natural cosmetic and skincare products and a $6.0 million participation in Bear Creek Corporation, a purveyor of premium catalog food products. In September 2004 we sold our entire participation in MD Beauty, Inc.
In June 2004, Home Care Supply Inc. repaid its entire $18.0 million outstanding loan obligation and remitted prepayment fees and a success fee of approximately $1.1 million with its final payment.
In July 2004, we entered into a $4.0 million loan investment, which also contains a success fee provision, with Allied Extruders, Inc., a manufacturer of polyethylene film.
In September 2004, Fugate and Associates, Inc. repaid its entire $5.2 million loan investment along with a success fee of $334,000 and related prepayment fees.
35
Subsequent to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004, in October 2004, we sold our entire participation in Burt’s Bees Inc. for a premium of $9,750 and in November 2004, America’s Water Heater Rentals repaid its entire $12.0 million outstanding loan obligation and remitted prepayment fees and a success fee of approximately $1.4 million with its final payment and A and G, Inc. repaid its entire $12.25 million outstanding loan obligation. Also, in November 2004, we entered into a $5.5 million loan investment, which also contains a success fee provision, with Global Material Technologies, Inc., a manufacturer and distributor of steel wool and metal fiber products, and a $7.95 million loan investment with Santana Products, Inc., a fabricator of solid plastic high density polyethylene bathroom partitions. We also purchased participations in Tech Lighting Corp. of $9.0 million and Valor Telecommunications, Inc. of $8.0 million.
The following table summarizes the contractual principal amortization and maturity of our investment portfolio by fiscal year:
|
Year |
|
Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
$ |
4,760,536 |
|
|
2006 |
|
$ |
20,713,431 |
|
|
2007 |
|
$ |
37,574,606 |
|
|
2008 |
|
$ |
31,109,625 |
|
|
2009 |
|
$ |
38,923,370 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
$ |
16,107,738 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
149,189,306 |
|
Cash provided by operating activities for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004, consisting primarily of the items described in “Results of Operations,” was approximately $13.5 million as compared to approximately $9.9 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003. Net cash used in investing activities for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004 was approximately $96.0 million as compared to net cash provided by investing activities of approximately $10.3 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003. At September 30, 2004, the net cash used was due largely in part to $57.1 million used in connection with the purchase of the repurchase agreements and the repayments of the repurchase agreements, and new investments of approximately $86.3 million, partially offset by principal repayments of $47.2 million. At September 30, 2003, the net cash provided was due largely in part to $39.2 million provided in connection with the repurchase agreements and the repayments of the repurchase agreements, and principal repayments of $18.0 million, partially offset by $47.0 million of invested cash. Net cash provided by financing activities was approximately $47.3 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004 and consisted of proceeds from a public shelf offering of common stock which yielded net proceeds of approximately $24.4 million, the borrowings, net of repayments, on the lines of credit for net proceeds of approximately $40.7 million, and the payment of dividends of approximately $17.1 million. Net cash used in financing activities was approximately $10.9 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003 and consisted of the payment of dividends of $9.8 million and the payment of deferred financing fees associated with the establishment of our warehouse line of credit of approximately $1.1 million.
During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004, cash and cash equivalents decreased from approximately $101.1 million at the beginning of the year to approximately $66.0 million at the end of the year. This decrease was largely the result of the purchase of new investments and the repurchase agreement described below.
During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003, cash and cash equivalents increased from approximately $91.9 million at the beginning of the year to approximately $101.1 million at the end of the year. This increase was largely the result of the repurchase agreement described below.
On September 29, 2004, we entered into a repurchase agreement (the “FBW Repurchase Agreement”) with Ferris Baker Watts for $44,984,950. On September 30, 2004, this amount was reduced to $21,345,997 with the application of the net proceeds from a public offering of our common stock. This remaining balance was settled on October 1, 2004. The FBW Repurchase Agreement was recorded at cost and was fully collateralized by a United States Treasury Bill with a fair value of $50,000,000, a carrying value of $49,984,950 that matured on October 7, 2004 and earned interest of $2,133. The interest rate on the FBW Repurchase Agreement was 4.25% for a cost of $7,831. In the future, we plan to use a similar form of repurchase agreement as an investment option or in order to satisfy certain asset diversification requirements and maintain our status as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code.
36
On September 30, 2003, we entered into a repurchase agreement (the “UBS Repurchase Agreement”) with UBS for $78,449,000, which agreement was settled on October 1, 2003. The UBS Repurchase Agreement was recorded at cost and was fully collateralized by a United States Treasury Bill with a fair value of $80,050,000 and a carrying value of $80,022,249 that matured on October 16, 2003. The interest rate on the UBS Repurchase Agreement was 0.80% for a cost of $2,397. The UBS Repurchase Agreement was reflected on the consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2003 as cash and cash equivalents pledged to creditors of $80.0 million and a liability of $78.4 million.
In order to qualify as a regulated investment company and to avoid corporate level tax on the income we distribute to our stockholders, we are required, under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code, to distribute at least 90% of our ordinary income and short-term capital gains to our stockholders on an annual basis. In accordance with these requirements, we declared and paid monthly cash dividends of $0.11 per common share for October, November and December 2003 and January, February, and March 2004, $0.115 per common share for April, May and June 2004, and $0.12 per common share for July, August and September 2004. For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003 we declared and paid quarterly dividends of $0.23, $0.25, $0.29, and $0.33 per common share for the first, second, third and fourth quarters, respectively.
Aggregate dividends declared and paid for the 2004 fiscal year were approximately $17.1 million and exceeded our current and accumulated earnings and profits and, as a result, a portion of these dividends were treated as a return of capital to our stockholders.
Aggregate dividends declared and paid for the 2003 fiscal year were approximately $11.1 million. This resulted in our net investment income exceeding the dividends related to our 2003 fiscal year by $0.3 million. Dividends related to our 2002 fiscal year exceeded our current and accumulated earnings and profits and, as a result, a portion of these dividends were treated as a return of capital to our stockholders.
We anticipate borrowing funds and issuing additional equity securities to obtain additional capital. To this end, we have filed with the SEC a registration statement that would permit us to issue, through one or more transactions, up to an aggregate of $75 million in securities, consisting of common stock, preferred stock and/or debt securities. On September 30, 2004, we closed on our public offering pursuant to this registration statement of 1,150,000 shares at price of $22.75, less underwriters’ discount of five percent for net proceeds of approximately $24.9 million, excluding offering costs. We used the proceeds from this offering to repay borrowings under our lines of credit. Following this offering we may sell up to approximately $48.8 million of securities from the shelf registration statement.
Revolving Credit Facility
Through our wholly-owned subsidiary Gladstone Business Loan LLC (“Business Loan”), the Company has obtained a $100 million revolving credit facility. On May 19, 2003, the Company executed a Purchase and Sale Agreement pursuant to which it agreed to sell certain loans to Business Loan in consideration of a membership interest therein. Simultaneously, Business Loan executed a Credit Agreement with CIBC World Markets Inc. (“CIBC”), as administrative agent, and others, pursuant to which Business Loan pledged the loans purchased from the Company to secure future advances by certain institutional lenders. On September 28, 2004, CIBC assigned its interest in the credit facility to Deutsche Bank AG. Interest rates charged on the advances under the facility are based on London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”), the Prime Rate or the Federal Funds Rate, depending on market conditions, and adjusts periodically. As of September 30, 2004, the outstanding principal balance under this credit facility was approximately $25.7 million at an interest rate of 3.29%.
The facility contains covenants that require Business Loan to maintain its status as a separate entity; prohibit certain significant corporate transactions (such as mergers, consolidations, liquidations or dissolutions); and restrict material changes to the Company’s credit and collection policies. The facility also restricts some of the terms and provisions (including interest rates, terms to maturity and payments schedules) and limits the borrower and industry concentrations of loans that are eligible to secure advances. As of September 30, 2004, Business Loan was in compliance with all of the facility covenants. The Company currently intends to securitize all of the loans held by Business Loan and will use the proceeds from the securitization to pay down any amounts then outstanding under the revolving credit facility.
37
Gladstone Management, our affiliated servicing entity, services the loans pledged under the facility. As a condition to this servicing arrangement, we executed a Performance Guaranty pursuant to which we guaranteed that Gladstone Management would comply fully with all of its obligations under the facility. The Performance Guaranty requires us to maintain a minimum net worth of $100 million and to maintain “asset coverage” with respect to “senior securities representing indebtedness” of at least 200%, in accordance with Section 18 of the 1940 Act. As of September 30, 2004, we were in compliance with our covenants under the Performance Guaranty.
In June 2004, the Company entered into a $15.0 million line of credit agreement with Branch Banking and Trust Company (“BB&T Agreement”) which matures on June 1, 2005. Interest on outstanding borrowings is based upon the one month LIBOR plus 2.5% per annum. The unused portion of the line of credit is subject to a fee of 0.2% per annum. The BB&T Agreement requires the Company to meet and maintain certain covenants and ratios with respect to leverage and liquidity. As of September 30, 2004, there was $15.0 million outstanding under the BB&T line of credit at an interest rate of 4.34%. At September 30, 2004, the Company was in compliance with all covenants under the BB&T Agreement.
The following table shows our significant contractual obligations for the repayment of debt and payment of other contractual obligations as of September 30, 2004.
|
|
|
Payments due by period |
|
||||||||||
|
Contractual Obligations (1) |
|
Total |
|
Less than 1 |
|
1-3 years |
|
3-5 years |
|
More than |
|
||
|
Long-Term Debt Obligations |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
||
|
Capital Lease Obligations |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
||
|
Operating Lease Obligations (2) |
|
57,696 |
|
57,696 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
||
|
Purchase Obligations (3) |
|
13,450,000 |
|
13,450,000 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
||
|
Other Long-Term Liabilities Reflected on the Registrant’s Balance Sheet under GAAP |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
||
|
Total |
|
$ |
13,507,696 |
|
$ |
13,507,696 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
(1) The information included in the table above is based upon the internal management structure that was in place as of September 30, 2004. We have entered into an investment advisory and administrative agreement with Gladstone Management that became effective on October 1, 2004. Pursuant to the advisory agreement, we are obligate to make certain payments to Gladstone Management that may increase the amount of our contractual obligations in future fiscal years. Payments under the advisory agreement consist of an annual advisory fee of 1.25% of our total assets (as reduced by cash and cash equivalents pledged to creditors), payable in quarterly increments of 0.3125%, and an annual administrative fee of 0.75% of our total assets (as reduced by cash and cash equivalents pledged to creditors), payable in quarterly increments of 0.1875%. As the payments under the advisory agreement will vary based on changes in our total assets during any give payment period, we cannot accurately predict the amount of payments under the advisory agreement. If the advisory agreement had been effective as of September 30, 2004, we estimate that our total contractual obligations would have been approximately $2.5 million. This estimate is based on the amount of our total assets (net of cash and cash equivalents pledged to creditors) as of September 30, 2004. As we expect to continue to make more investments in future fiscal years, we expense that the amount of our total assets may increase, and thus, the contractual obligations attributable to advisory fee payments under the advisory agreement are likely to be higher than this estimated amount.
(2) Operating lease obligations represent the office leases for McLean, Virginia, New York City and Chicago, Illinois facilities which are scheduled to expire during the fiscal year 2005. Effective October 1, 2004, all of these office leases were assigned to Gladstone Management pursuant to the advisory agreement and Gladstone Management will now pay these expenses directly. Any future office lease renewals shall be done so by Gladstone Management.
(3) The purchase obligations reflected in the above table represent commitments outstanding as of September 30, 2004 to fund two loan investments which were subsequently closed in November 2004.
38
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We are subject to financial market risks, including changes in interest rates. We expect that, ultimately, approximately 50% of the loans in our portfolio will be made at fixed rates, with approximately 50% made at variable rates. Currently our portfolio has approximately 35% of the total of the loan portfolio cost basis at fixed rates, approximately 42% of the total loan portfolio cost basis at variable rates with a floor and the remaining 23% of the total loan portfolio cost basis at variable rates.
In addition, we have two variable rate borrowing facilities. We have a $100 million revolving credit facility with Deutsche Bank AG which matures in May 2005. We also have a $15 million line of credit agreement which matures in June 2005.
To illustrate the potential impact of changes in interest rates on our net increase in stockholders’ equity resulting from operations, we have performed the following analysis, which assumes that our balance sheet remains constant and no further actions beyond the interest rate cap agreement are taken to alter our existing interest rate sensitivity. Under this analysis, a hypothetical increase in the one month LIBOR by 1% would increase our net increase in stockholders’ equity resulting from operations by approximately $313,000 or 3.02%, over the next twelve months, compared to the net increase in stockholders’ equity resulting from operations for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004. A hypothetical decrease in the one month LIBOR by 1% would decrease net increase in stockholders’ equity resulting from operations by approximately $313,000, or 3.02%, over the next twelve months, compared to the net increase in stockholders’ equity resulting from operations for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004. Although management believes that this analysis is indicative of our existing interest rate sensitivity, it does not adjust for potential changes in credit quality, size and composition of our loan portfolio on the balance sheet and other business developments that could affect net increase in stockholders’ equity resulting from operations. Accordingly, no assurances can be given that actual results would not differ materially from the results under this hypothetical analysis.
In February 2004, we entered into an interest rate cap agreement as required under our line of credit to enter into certain hedging transactions in connection with our borrowings under the line of credit. We purchased this interest rate cap agreement with a notional amount of $35 million for a one-time, up-front payment of $304,000. The interest rate cap agreement entitles us to receive payments, if any, equal to the amount by which interest payments on $35 million at the point which one month LIBOR exceed the interest payments on $35 million at 5%. The cap expires in February 2009. This interest rate cap agreement effectively caps our interest payments on our line of credit borrowing, up to the notional amount of the interest rate cap, at five percent. This mitigates our exposure to increases in interest rates on our borrowings on our lines of credit, which are at variable rates. At September 30, 2004, the cap agreement had a fair market value of approximately $89,741. At September 30, 2004, the one month LIBOR rate was approximately 1.84%.
In the event that we securitize a portion of our loan portfolio, we believe that we will likely be required to enter into further hedging arrangements in the future with respect to securitized loans. While hedging activities may mitigate our exposure to adverse fluctuations in interest rates, certain hedging transactions that we may enter into in the future, such as interest rate swap agreements, may also limit our ability to participate in the benefits of lower interest rates with respect to our portfolio of investments.
39
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2004 and September 30, 2003 |
|
|
Consolidated Schedules of Investments as of September 30, 2004 and September 30, 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
of Gladstone Capital Corporation:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, including the schedules of investments, of Gladstone Capital Corporation as of September 30, 2004 and September 30, 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 2004. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Gladstone Capital Corporation at September 30, 2004 and September 30, 2003 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 2004 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The financial statements for the Company as of September 30, 2002 and for the year then ended were audited by other auditors whose report dated November 1, 2002 expressed an unqualified opinion on those statements.
|
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
|
|
McLean, Virginia |
|
|
December 13, 2004 |
|
41
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows of Gladstone Captial Corporation (the Company) for the year ended September 30, 2002. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated results of operations and cash flows of Gladtone Captial Corporation for the year ended September 30, 2002 in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
|
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP |
|
|
McLean, Virginia |
|
|
November 1, 2002 |
|
42
GLADSTONE CAPITAL CORPORATION
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
||
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Investments at fair value (Cost 9/30/2004: $149,189,306; 9/30/2003: $109,529,893) |
|
$ |
146,446,240 |
|
$ |
109,307,553 |
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
15,969,890 |
|
21,143,972 |
|
||
|
Cash and cash equivalents pledged to creditors |
|
49,984,950 |
|
80,022,249 |
|
||
|
Interest receivable – investments in debt securities |
|
837,336 |
|
1,041,943 |
|
||
|
Interest receivable – cash and cash equivalents |
|
— |
|
955 |
|
||
|
Interest receivable – officers |
|
112,960 |
|
108,657 |
|
||
|
Due from custodian |
|
1,203,079 |
|
1,207,000 |
|
||
|
Due from affiliate |
|
109,639 |
|
42,131 |
|
||
|
Deferred financing fees |
|
350,737 |
|
1,086,864 |
|
||
|
Prepaid assets |
|
191,676 |
|
392,951 |
|
||
|
Other assets |
|
127,220 |
|
212,388 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
$ |
215,333,727 |
|
$ |
214,566,663 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
105,921 |
|
$ |
23,247 |
|
|
Dividends payable |
|
— |
|
3,327,009 |
|
||
|
Borrowings under lines of credit |
|
40,743,547 |
|
— |
|
||
|
Accrued expenses and deferred liabilities |
|
911,607 |
|
1,965,025 |
|
||
|
Repurchase agreement |
|
21,345,997 |
|
78,449,000 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Total Liabilities |
|
$ |
63,107,072 |
|
$ |
83,764,281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized and 11,278,510 and 10,081,844 shares issued and outstanding, respectively |
|
$ |
11,279 |
|
$ |
10,082 |
|
|
Capital in excess of par value |
|
164,294,781 |
|
140,416,674 |
|
||
|
Notes receivable – officers |
|
(9,432,678 |
) |
(8,985,940 |
) |
||
|
Net unrealized depreciation on investments |
|
(2,743,066 |
) |
(222,340 |
) |
||
|
Unrealized depreciation on derivative |
|
(214,259 |
) |
— |
|
||
|
Distributions less than (in excess of) net investment income |
|
310,598 |
|
(416,094 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Total Stockholders’ Equity |
|
$ |
152,226,655 |
|
$ |
130,802,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY |
|
$ |
215,333,727 |
|
$ |
214,566,663 |
|
See accompanying notes.
43
GLADSTONE CAPITAL CORPORATION
SEPTEMBER 30, 2004
|
Company (1) |
|
Industry |
|
Investment (2) |
|
Cost |
|
Fair Value |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
A and G, Inc. (d/b/a Alstyle) |
|
Activewear products |
|
Senior Term Debt (3) (6) |
|
$ |
12,250,000 |
|
$ |
12,250,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Allied Extruders, |
|
Polyethylene film manufacturer |
|
Senior Term Debt (3) |
|
4,000,000 |
|
4,000,000 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
America’s Water Heater Rentals |
|
Household appliances |
|
Senior Term Debt (4) (6)
(8) |
|
12,000,000 |
|
12,840,000 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
ARI Holdings, Inc. |
|
Manufacturing-auto parts |
|
Senior Term Debt (6) |
|
1,190,141 |
|
1,188,653 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
(9.75%, Due 6/2008) |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Subordinated Term Debt (5) (6) |
|
3,657,164 |
|
3,634,306 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
(11%, PIK 4%, Due 12/2008) |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Bear Creek |
|
Premium horticultural and food products |
|
Senior Subordinated Term
Debt (7) |
|
6,000,000 |
|
6,090,000 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Benetech, Inc. |
|
Dust management systems for the coal and electric utility industries |
|
Senior Term Debt (6) |
|
3,168,750 |
|
3,160,828 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Burt’s Bees, Inc. |
|
Personal & household products |
|
Senior Term Debt (7) |
|
975,000 |
|
987,188 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Coyne International Enterprises |
|
Industrial services |
|
Senior Term Debt (3) (5)
(6) |
|
15,700,625 |
|
15,308,110 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Finn Corporation |
|
Manufacturing-landscape equipment |
|
Senior Subordinated Term
Debt (6) |
|
10,500,000 |
|
7,612,500 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock Warrants |
|
37,000 |
|
474,984 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Gammill, Inc. |
|
Designer and assembler of quilting machines and accessories |
|
Senior Term Debt (6) |
|
4,708,013 |
|
4,731,553 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Inca Metal Products Corporation |
|
Material handling and storage products |
|
Senior Term Debt (3) (6) |
|
2,387,548 |
|
2,136,855 |
|
||
|
Kingway Acquisition, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Clymer Acquisition, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Maidenform, Inc. |
|
Intimate apparel |
|
Senior Subordinated Term Debt (7) |
|
10,003,571 |
|
10,175,000 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
(9.4%, Due 5/2011) |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Marcal Paper Mills, Inc. |
|
Manufacturing-paper products |
|
Senior Subordinated Term
Debt (6) |
|
6,800,000 |
|
6,188,000 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
MedAssets, Inc. |
|
Pharmaceuticals and healthcare GPO |
|
Senior Term Debt (7) |
|
1,815,497 |
|
1,806,887 |
|
||
44
|
Company (1) |
|
Industry |
|
Investment (2) |
|
Cost |
|
Fair Value |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Mistras Holdings Corp. |
|
Nondestructive testing instruments, systems and services |
|
Senior Term Debt (3) (6) |
|
9,833,333 |
|
9,759,583 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Woven Electronics Corporation |
|
Custom electrical cable assemblies |
|
Senior Term Debt (3) (6) |
|
2,488,000 |
|
2,484,890 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Term Debt (4) (6) |
|
12,000,000 |
|
11,985,000 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
(11.5%, Due 3/2009) |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Total: |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
149,189,306 |
|
$ |
146,446,240 |
|
(1) We do not “Control,” and are not an “Affiliate” of, any of our portfolio companies, each as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”). In general, under the 1940 Act, we would “Control” a portfolio company if we owned 25% or more of its voting securities and would be an “Affiliate” of a portfolio company if we owned 5% or more of its voting securities.
(2) Percentage represents interest rates in effect at September 30, 2004 and due date represents the contractual maturity date.
(3) Last Out Tranche of senior debt, meaning if the company is liquidated then the holder of the Last Out Tranche is paid after the senior debt.
(4) Last Out Tranche of senior debt, meaning if the company is liquidated then the holder of the Last Out Tranche is paid after the senior debt, however the debt is junior to another Last Out Tranche.
(5) Has some paid in kind (PIK) interest. Refer to Note 2 “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies”.
(6) Fair value was based on valuation prepared and provided by Standard & Poor’s Loan Evaluation Services.
(7) Marketable securities are valued based on the bid price, as of September 30, 2004, from the respective originating syndication agent’s trading desk.
(8) Includes a success fee with a fair value of $660,000 and no cost basis.
See accompanying notes.
45
GLADSTONE CAPITAL CORPORATION
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2003
|
Company (1) |
|
Industry |
|
Investment (2) |
|
Cost |
|
Fair Value |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
America’s Water Heater Rentals |
|
Household appliances rental |
|
Senior Term Debt (3) (5) |
|
12,000,000 |
|
12,000,000 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
ARI Holdings, Inc. |
|
Manufacturing-auto parts |
|
Second Lien Term Debt (3) |
|
1,500,000 |
|
1,500,000 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
(5.1%, Due 6/2008) |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Term Debt (3) (4) |
|
3,511,667 |
|
3,511,667 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
(8.0%, PIK 4%, Due 12/2008) |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Coyne International Enterprises |
|
Industrial services |
|
Senior Term Debt (3) (4) (5) |
|
15,421,740 |
|
15,306,077 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Finn Corporation |
|
Manufacturing-landscape equipment |
|
Senior Subordinated Term Debt (6) |
|
10,500,000 |
|
10,421,250 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock Warrants |
|
37,000 |
|
431,111 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Fugate and Associates, Inc. (d/b/a ERS Imaging) |
|
Aggregator & Reseller - |
|
Senior Term Debt (5) |
|
3,412,500 |
|
3,412,500 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Home Care Supply, Inc. |
|
Medical equipment rental |
|
Senior Term Debt (3) (5) (6) |
|
18,000,000 |
|
18,428,400 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
(12.0%, Due 10/2008) |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Inca Metal Products Corporation |
|
Material handling and storage products |
|
Senior Term Debt (3) (5) |
|
5,775,000 |
|
4,995,375 |
|
||
|
Kingway Acquisition, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Clymer Acquisition, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Kozy Schack Enterprises, Inc. |
|
Food production and sales |
|
Senior Term Debt (3) (5) |
|
900,000 |
|
909,000 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Marcal Paper Mills, Inc. |
|
Manufacturing-paper products |
|
Senior Term Debt (3) (5) |
|
6,975,000 |
|
6,922,687 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
First Mortgage Debt (4) |
|
9,163,653 |
|
9,163,653 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
(16.0%, PIK 1%, Due 12/2006) |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Mistras Holdings Corp. |
|
Nondestructive testing |
|
Senior Term Debt (3) |
|
10,000,000 |
|
10,000,000 |
|
||
|
|
|
instruments, systems |
|
(10.5%, Due 8/2008) |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
and services |
|
Senior Term Debt (3) |
|
5,000,000 |
|
5,000,000 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
(12.5%, Due 8/2008) |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Wingstop Restaurants International, Inc. |
|
Restaurant - fast food |
|
Senior Term Debt (5) |
|
3,500,000 |
|
3,482,500 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Debt (5) |
|
2,000,000 |
|
1,990,000 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
(8.5%, Due 1/2008) |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Total: |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
109,529,893 |
|
$ |
109,307,553 |
|
(1) We do not “Control,” and are not an “Affiliate” of, any of our portfolio companies, each as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”). In general, under the 1940 Act, we would “Control” a portfolio company if we owned 25% or more of its voting securities and would be an “Affiliate” of a portfolio company if we owned 5% or more of its voting securities.
46
(2) Percentage represents interest rates in effect at September 30, 2003 and due date represents the contractual maturity date.
(3) Last Out Tranche of senior debt, meaning if the company is liquidated then the holder of the Last Out Tranche is paid after the senior debt.
(4) Has some paid in kind (PIK) interest. Refer to Note 2 “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies”.
(5) Fair value was based on valuation prepared and provided by Standard & Poor’s Loan Evaluation Services.
(6) Includes a success fee with a fair value of $473,400 and no cost basis.
See accompanying notes.
47
GLADSTONE CAPITAL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
Year Ended September 30, |
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|||||
|
INVESTMENT INCOME |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Interest income – investments |
|
$ |
18,176,617 |
|
$ |
13,248,415 |
|
$ |
6,641,144 |
|
||
|
Interest income – cash and cash equivalents |
|
84,273 |
|
466,316 |
|
1,576,304 |
|
|||||
|
Interest income – notes receivable from officers |
|
443,658 |
|
437,737 |
|
433,391 |
|
|||||
|
Managerial assistance fees |
|
1,118,106 |
|
885,500 |
|
1,673,614 |
|
|||||
|
Other income |
|
573,314 |
|
116,906 |
|
131,250 |
|
|||||
|
|
Total investment income |
|
20,395,968 |
|
15,154,874 |
|
10,455,703 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
EXPENSES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Salaries and benefits |
|
2,554,490 |
|
2,018,004 |
|
1,367,180 |
|
|||||
|
Rent |
|
139,399 |
|
209,864 |
|
125,128 |
|
|||||
|
Professional fees |
|
579,599 |
|
409,826 |
|
549,781 |
|
|||||
|
Directors fees |
|
112,210 |
|
73,647 |
|
22,000 |
|
|||||
|
Insurance |
|
258,358 |
|
275,511 |
|
206,385 |
|
|||||
|
Stockholder related costs |
|
140,090 |
|
143,273 |
|
104,167 |
|
|||||
|
Financing fees |
|
1,373,415 |
|
222,038 |
|
— |
|
|||||
|
Interest |
|
741,621 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|||||
|
Loan servicing |
|
501,670 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|||||
|
General and administrative |
|
702,341 |
|
506,790 |
|
464,461 |
|
|||||
|
|
Total expenses |
|
7,103,193 |
|
3,858,953 |
|
2,839,102 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
NET INVESTMENT INCOME |
|
13,292,775 |
|
11,295,921 |
|
7,616,601 |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN (LOSS) ON INVESTMENTS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Realized gain on sale of investment |
|
12,500 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|||||
|
Unrealized depreciation on derivative |
|
(214,259 |
) |
— |
|
— |
|
|||||
|
Net unrealized depreciation on investments |
|
(2,520,726 |
) |
(222,340 |
) |
— |
|
|||||
|
|
Net loss on investments |
|
(2,722,485 |
) |
(222,340 |
) |
— |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
NET INCREASE IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS |
|
$ |
10,570,290 |
|
$ |
11,073,581 |
|
$ |
7,616,601 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
NET INCREASE IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS PER COMMON SHARE: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Basic |
|
$ |
1.05 |
|
$ |
1.10 |
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
||
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
1.02 |
|
$ |
1.09 |
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK OUTSTANDING: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Basic |
|
10,101,341 |
|
10,072,677 |
|
10,064,900 |
|
|||||
|
Diluted |
|
10,344,388 |
|
10,188,488 |
|
10,166,752 |
|
|||||
See accompanying notes.
48
GLADSTONE CAPITAL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes |
|
Distributions in |
|
Realized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital in |
|
Receivable |
|
Excess of Net |
|
Gain on |
|
Appreciation/ |
|
Appreciation/ |
|
Total |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
Excess of |
|
From Sale of |
|
Investment |
|
Sale of |
|
(Depreciation) |
|
(Depreciation) |
|
Stockholders’ |
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
Shares |
|
Amount |
|
Par Value |
|
Common Stock |
|
Income |
|
Investment |
|
of Investments |
|
of Derivatives |
|
Equity |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Balance at September 30, 2001 |
|
10,060,178 |
|
$ |
10,060 |
|
$ |
140,131,778 |
|
$ |
(8,800,050 |
) |
$ |
(92,644 |
) |
$ |
— |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
131,249,144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Issuance of Common Stock Under Stock Option Plan |
|
11,666 |
|
12 |
|
185,878 |
|
(185,890 |
) |
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Shelf Offering Costs |
|
— |
|
— |
|
(50,972 |
) |
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
(50,972 |
) |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Repayment of Principal on Notes Receivable |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
|
2,144 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
2,144 |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Net Increase in Stockholders’ Equity Resulting from Operations |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
7,616,601 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
7,616,601 |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Distributions Declared ($0.81 per common share) |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
(8,153,644 |
) |
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
(8,153,644 |
) |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Balance at September 30, 2002 |
|
10,071,844 |
|
$ |
10,072 |
|
$ |
140,266,684 |
|
$ |
(8,983,796 |
) |
$ |
(629,687 |
) |
$ |
— |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
130,663,273 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Issuance of Common Stock Under Stock Option Plan |
|
10,000 |
|
10 |
|
149,990 |
|
(150,000 |
) |
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Repayment of Principal on Notes Receivable |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
147,856 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
147,856 |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Net Increase in Stockholders’ Equity Resulting from Operations |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
11,295,921 |
|
— |
|
(222,340 |
) |
— |
|
11,073,581 |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Distributions Declared ($1.10 per common share) |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
(11,082,328 |
) |
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
(11,082,328 |
) |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Balance at September 30, 2003 |
|
10,081,844 |
|
$ |
10,082 |
|
$ |
140,416,674 |
|
$ |
(8,985,940 |
) |
$ |
(416,094 |
) |
$ |
— |
|
$ |
(222,340 |
) |
$ |
— |
|
$ |
130,802,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Issuance of Common Stock Under Shelf Offering |
|
1,150,000 |
|
1,150 |
|
24,854,375 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
24,855,525 |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Shelf Offering Costs |
|
— |
|
— |
|
(476,168 |
) |
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
(476,168 |
) |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Issuance of Common Stock Under Stock Option Plan |
|
46,666 |
|
47 |
|
707,043 |
|
(549,990 |
) |
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
157,100 |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Repayment of Principal on Notes Receivable |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
103,252 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
103,252 |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Net Increase in Stockholders’ Equity Resulting from Operations |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
13,292,775 |
|
12,500 |
|
(2,520,726 |
) |
(214,259 |
) |
10,570,290 |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Distributions Declared ($1.245 per common share) |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
(12,578,583 |
) |
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
(12,578,583 |
) |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Tax Return of Capital ($0.12 per common share) |
|
— |
|
— |
|
(1,207,143 |
) |
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
(1,207,143 |
) |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Balance at September 30, 2004 |
|
11,278,510 |
|
$ |
11,279 |
|
$ |
164,294,781 |
|
$ |
(9,432,678 |
) |
$ |
(298,098 |
) |
$ |
12,500 |
|
$ |
(2,743,066 |
) |
$ |
(214,259 |
) |
$ |
152,226,655 |
|
See accompanying notes.
49
GLADSTONE CAPITAL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
Year Ended |
|
Year Ended |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Net increase in stockholders’ equity resulting from operations |
|
$ |
10,570,290 |
|
$ |
11,073,581 |
|
$ |
7,616,601 |
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net increase in stockholders’ equity resulting from operations to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Depreciation |
|
24,356 |
|
29,310 |
|
13,822 |
|
|||
|
Amortization of premiums |
|
2,036 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|||
|
Amortization of deferred financing fees |
|
1,303,776 |
|
— |
|
|
|
|||
|
Unrealized depreciation on derivative |
|
214,259 |
|
— |
|
|
|
|||
|
Change in net unrealized depreciation |
|
2,520,726 |
|
222,340 |
|
— |
|
|||
|
Decrease (increase) in interest receivable |
|
201,259 |
|
(352,018 |
) |
(719,638 |
) |
|||
|
Decrease (increase) in funds due from custodian |
|
3,921 |
|
(1,207,000 |
) |
— |
|
|||
|
Decrease (increase) in prepaid assets |
|
201,275 |
|
(34,996 |
) |
(191,705 |
) |
|||
|
Increase in due from affiliate |
|
(67,508 |
) |
(42,131 |
) |
— |
|
|||
|
Decrease (increase) in other assets |
|
33,188 |
|
(42,485 |
) |
75,546 |
|
|||
|
Increase in accounts payable |
|
82,674 |
|
23,247 |
|
— |
|
|||
|
Increase in accrued expenses and deferred liabilities |
|
(1,053,418 |
) |
1,020,065 |
|
579,000 |
|
|||
|
Increase in investment balance due to payment in kind interest |
|
(552,944 |
) |
(806,088 |
) |
(400,491 |
) |
|||
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
13,483,890 |
|
9,883,825 |
|
6,973,135 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Sale (purchase) of furniture & equipment - net |
|
117,365 |
|
(82,344 |
) |
(70,976 |
) |
|||
|
Purchase of investments |
|
(86,267,500 |
) |
(47,011,278 |
) |
(97,705,054 |
) |
|||
|
Principal repayments on investments |
|
47,158,995 |
|
18,005,827 |
|
18,387,191 |
|
|||
|
Proceeds from repurchase agreements |
|
285,099,546 |
|
245,070,973 |
|
44,098,719 |
|
|||
|
Repayment of repurchase agreements |
|
(342,202,549 |
) |
(205,820,693 |
) |
(4,900,000 |
) |
|||
|
Receipt of principal on notes receivable - officers |
|
103,252 |
|
147,856 |
|
2,144 |
|
|||
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities |
|
(95,990,891 |
) |
10,310,341 |
|
(40,187,976 |
) |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Net proceeds from issuance of common shares |
|
24,379,357 |
|
— |
|
(50,972 |
) |
|||
|
Borrowings from the lines of credit |
|
114,743,547 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|||
|
Repayments on the lines of credit |
|
(74,000,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Deferred financing fees |
|
(567,649 |
) |
(1,086,864 |
) |
— |
|
|||
|
Decrease in accrued offering costs |
|
— |
|
— |
|
(590,382 |
) |
|||
|
Distributions paid |
|
(17,112,735 |
) |
(9,870,409 |
) |
(6,038,557 |
) |
|||
|
Purchase of derivative |
|
(304,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Exercise of employee stock options |
|
157,100 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|||
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
47,295,620 |
|
(10,957,273 |
) |
(6,679,911 |
) |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
NET (DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS (1) |
|
(35,211,381 |
) |
9,236,893 |
|
(39,894,752 |
) |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD |
|
101,166,221 |
|
91,929,328 |
|
131,824,080 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD |
|
$ |
65,954,840 |
|
$ |
101,166,221 |
|
$ |
91,929,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
CASH PAID DURING PERIOD FOR INTEREST |
|
$ |
672,449 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
NON-CASH FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Notes receivable issued in exchange for common stock associated with the exercise of employee stock options |
|
$ |
549,990 |
|
$ |
150,000 |
|
$ |
185,890 |
|
(1) Cash and cash equivalents consist of demand deposits and highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less when purchased.
See accompanying notes.
50
GLADSTONE CAPITAL CORPORATION
SEPTEMBER 30, 2004
Note 1. Organization
Gladstone Capital Corporation (the Company) was incorporated under the General Corporation Laws of the State of Maryland on May 30, 2001 as a closed-end investment company. The Company has elected to be treated as a business development company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. In addition, the Company has elected to be treated for tax purposes as a regulated investment company, or RIC, under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code). The Company’s investment objectives are to achieve a high level of current income by investing in debt and equity securities of established private businesses.
Gladstone Capital Advisers, Inc. (Advisers), a wholly-owned subsidiary, conducts the daily administrative operations of the Company and provides managerial assistance to the Company’s portfolio companies.
Gladstone Business Loan LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, was established on February 3, 2003 for the purpose of owning the Company’s portfolio of loan investments. The financial statements of the subsidiary are consolidated with those of the Company.
Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.
Use of Estimates
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America that require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results may differ from those estimates.
Reclassifications
Certain amounts in the prior years’ financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation with no effect to net increase in stockholders’ equity resulting from operations.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents consist of demand deposits and highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less when purchased. Cash and cash equivalents are carried at cost which approximates fair value as of September 30, 2004. Cash and cash equivalents pledged to creditors as of September 30, 2004 consists of the United States Treasury Bill that collateralizes the Company’s Repurchase Agreement.
Concentration of Credit Risk
The Company places its cash and cash equivalents with financial institutions and, at times, cash held in checking accounts may exceed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insured limit.
51
Investment Valuation
The Company carries its investments at fair value, as determined by its Board of Directors. Securities that are publicly traded are valued at the closing price on the valuation date. Securities for which a limited market exists, such as participations in syndicated loans, are valued at the indicative bid price on the valuation date. Debt and equity securities that are not publicly traded are valued at fair value as determined in good faith by the Board of Directors. Beginning in March 2003, the Company engaged Standard & Poor’s Loan Evaluation Service (S&P) to perform independent valuations of its investments. The Board of Directors uses the recommended valuations as prepared by S&P as a component of the foundation for the final fair value determination. In making such determination, the Board of Directors values non-convertible debt securities at cost plus amortized original issue discount plus payment in kind (“PIK”) interest, if any, unless adverse factors lead to a determination of a lesser valuation. In valuing convertible debt, equity, success or exit fees or other equity like securities, the Board of Directors determines the fair value based on the collateral, the issuer’s ability to make payments, the earnings of the issuer, sales to third parties of similar securities, the comparison to publicly traded securities, discounted cash flow and other pertinent factors. Due to the uncertainty inherent in the valuation process, such estimates of fair value may differ significantly from the values that would have resulted had a ready market for the securities existed, and the differences could be material. Additionally, changes in the market environment and other events that may occur over the life of the investments may cause the gains ultimately realized on these investments to be different than the valuation currently assigned. Because there is a lag between when the Company closes a loan and when the loan can be evaluated by S&P, new loans are not valued immediately by S&P; rather, the Board of Directors makes its own determination about the value of the loan in accordance with the Company’s valuation policy. Because S&P does not perform independent valuations of mortgage loans or equity securities, the Board of Directors also determines the fair value of these investments without the input of S&P. The Board of Directors considers a number of qualitative and quantitative factors in current market conditions when performing valuations.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment were carried at cost and depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets ranging from three to five years. On July 1, 2004, the Company sold its fixed assets at net book value to Gladstone Management Corporation.
Interest Income Recognition
Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis to the extent that such amounts are expected to be collected. The Company stops accruing interest on its investments when it is determined that interest is no longer collectible. Conditional interest or a success fee is recorded when earned upon full repayment of a loan investment.
Payment in Kind Interest
The Company has loans in its portfolio which contain a payment in kind (“PIK”) provision. The PIK interest, computed at the contractual rate specified in each loan agreement, is added to the principal balance of the loan and recorded as income. To maintain the Company’s status as a RIC, this non-cash source of income must be paid out to stockholders in the form of dividends, even though the Company has not yet collected the cash. For the years ended September 30, 2004, September 30, 2003 and September 30, 2002, the Company recorded PIK income of $553,409, $781,407 and $461,627, respectively.
Managerial Assistance Fees
The 1940 Act requires that a business development company make available managerial assistance to its portfolio companies. The Company provides managerial assistance to its portfolio companies in connection with its investments through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Gladstone Capital Advisers, Inc. and receives fees for managerial assistance services. These fees are normally paid at the closing of the investments, are generally non-recurring and are recognized as revenue when earned upon closing the investment. The managerial assistance services the Company provides vary by investment, but generally consist of reviewing existing credit facilities, arranging bank financing, arranging equity financing, structuring financing from multiple lenders, structuring financing from equity investors, restructuring existing loans, raising equity and debt capital, and providing general financial advice, which concludes upon closing of the loan. Any services of this nature subsequent to the closing would generally generate a separate fee at the time of completion. If the Company is invited to participate as a co-lender in a transaction and in the event that the Company does not provide significant managerial assistance services in connection with the investment, loan fees paid to the Company in such situations are deferred and amortized over the life of the loan. Effective October 1, 2004, Gladstone Management Corporation began providing these services and will receive any such related fees.
52
Stock Options
The Company applies Accounting Principles Board Opinion (“APB”) No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” (APB 25), and related interpretations in accounting for its stock-based compensation plan. In December 2002, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) Statement No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure” which amended SFAS 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (SFAS 123). The Company adopted SFAS 148 on January 1, 2003 and elects to continue to account for its stock-based compensation plan under the provisions of APB 25. The Company continues to provide pro forma disclosure (see Note 4) of the Company’s net increase (decrease) to stockholders’ equity resulting from operations calculated as if the grants of stock options had been recorded as compensation costs in accordance with SFAS 148 and 123.
Management Fees
The Company was self-managed and therefore did not incur management fees payable to third parties during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004.
In July 2003, the Company entered into an expense sharing arrangement with Gladstone Management Corporation (“Gladstone Management”), a registered investment adviser that serves as the external adviser to Gladstone Commercial Corporation, a real estate investment trust, an affiliate. Under this expense sharing arrangement, Gladstone Management reimbursed Gladstone Capital Advisers for a portion of total payroll and benefits expenses (based on the percentage of total hours worked by each of the Company’s employees on Gladstone Commercial matters). Gladstone Management also reimbursed Gladstone Capital Advisers for its pro rata portion of all other general expenses (based on the percentage of total hours worked by all employees on Gladstone Commercial matters). Gladstone Management further passed its share of these expenses along to Gladstone Commercial under a separate advisory agreement. As a result of this expense sharing arrangement, certain of expenses, such as rent and insurance, declined during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004. Following the engagement of Gladstone Management on October 1, 2004, the first day of the 2005 fiscal year, Gladstone Management now directly employs all personnel and pays the payroll, benefits, and general expenses directly. Thus, the expense sharing arrangement between Gladstone Capital Advisers and Gladstone Management terminated upon the externalization of management on October 1, 2004.
Effective October 1, 2004, pursuant to the advisory agreement with Gladstone Management, the Company will pay Gladstone Management an annual advisory fee of 1.25% of the Company’s total assets (as reduced by cash and cash equivalents pledged to creditors), payable in quarterly increments of 0.3125%, and an annual administrative fee of 0.75% of the Company’s total assets (as reduced by cash and cash equivalents pledged to creditors), payable in quarterly increments of 0.1875%. The Company will receive a credit against this advisory fee for any managerial assistance fees received by Gladstone Management. The Company will continue to pay direct expenses including, but not limited to, directors fees, legal and accounting fees, and stockholder related expenses.
Federal Income Taxes
The Company intends to continue to qualify for treatment as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code. As a RIC, the Company is not subject to federal income tax on the portion of its taxable income and gains distributed to stockholders. To qualify as a RIC, the Company is required to distribute to its stockholders at least 90% of investment company taxable income, as defined by the Code.
Dividends
Distributions to stockholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. The Company is required to pay out at least 90% of its ordinary income and short-term capital gains for each taxable year as a dividend to its stockholders in order to maintain its status as a RIC under Subtitle A, Chapter 1 of Subchapter M of the Code. It is the policy of the Company to pay out as a dividend up to 100% of those amounts. The amount to be paid out as a dividend is determined by the Board of Directors each quarter and is based on the annual earnings estimated by the management of the Company. Based on that estimate, a dividend is declared each quarter and is paid out monthly over the course of the respective quarter. At year-end the Company may pay a bonus dividend, in addition to the monthly dividends, to ensure that it has paid out at least 90% of its ordinary income and short-term capital gains for the year. The Company has a policy of retaining long-term capital gains, if any, and not paying them out as dividends.
53
Note 3. Issuance of Common Stock
On September 30, 2004, the Company closed a public offering of common stock. The Company issued 1,150,000 shares of common stock at $22.75 per share, less an underwriting discount of $1.14 per share or 5%, and offering expenses of $476,168 for total net proceeds of $24,378,207.
Note 4. Stock Option Plan
Effective February 24, 2003 the Company adopted the Amended and Restated 2001 Equity Incentive Plan (the 2001 Plan). The Company has authorized 2,000,000 shares of capital stock for the issuance of options under the 2001 Plan to employees and directors. Options granted under the 2001 Plan may be exercised during a term not to exceed ten years from the date of grant. Unless terminated sooner by the Company’s Board of Directors, the 2001 Plan will terminate on June 1, 2011 and no additional awards may be made under the 2001 Plan after that date. Only employees of the Company and its subsidiaries are eligible to receive incentive stock options and both employees and non-employee directors are eligible to receive nonstatutory stock options under the 2001 Plan.
Options granted under the 2001 Plan may be either incentive stock options or nonstatutory stock options. The option exercise price is equal to the market price on the date of the grant. For the options granted during fiscal year 2004, 50% vest after one year after the grant date and the remaining 50% vest on the second year anniversary of the grant date. A portion of the options granted during the fiscal years ended September 30, 2003 and September 30, 2002 and each option granted during the period from inception through September 30, 2001 vest as follows: one-half of the number of shares issuable upon exercise of the option vested immediately on the grant date and the remaining shares vest on the date that is one year after the grant date. The remaining options granted during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002 vest as follows: 60% of the shares issuable upon exercise of the options vested immediately on the grant date and the remaining shares vest on the date that is one year after the grant date. Some of the options granted during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003 vested at 25% on the grant date, 25% two months after the grant date, 25% seven months after the grant date and the final 25% vest one year and two months after the grant date.
The company accounts for its stock-based compensation plans in accordance with APB 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees”. The pro forma information below illustrates the effect on net increase (decrease) in stockholders’ equity resulting from operations per share based on provisions of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”, as amended by SFAS 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation — Transition and Disclosure”, issued in December 2002.
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
Year Ended |
|
Year Ended |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Net increase (decrease) in stockholders’ equity resulting from operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
As reported: |
|
$ |
10,570,290 |
|
$ |
11,073,581 |
|
$ |
7,616,601 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Deduct: Total stock-based compensation expense determined using the fair value based method for all awards |
|
(1,687,199 |
) |
(1,576,555 |
) |
(1,555,099 |
) |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Pro forma net increase in stockholders’ equity resulting from operations per share |
|
$ |
8,883,091 |
|
$ |
9,497,026 |
|
$ |
6,061,502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
As reported - basic |
|
$ |
1.05 |
|
$ |
1.10 |
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
|
As reported - diluted |
|
$ |
1.02 |
|
$ |
1.09 |
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Pro forma-basic |
|
$ |
0.88 |
|
$ |
0.94 |
|
$ |
0.60 |
|
|
Pro forma-diluted |
|
$ |
0.86 |
|
$ |
0.93 |
|
$ |
0.60 |
|
54
For options granted during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004, the Company estimated a weighted-average fair value of $1.24 using a Black-Scholes option pricing model and the following weighted-average assumptions: dividend yield of 6.67%, risk-free interest rate of 2.41%, expected volatility of 16.91%, and expected lives of the options of three years. For options granted during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003, the Company estimated a weighted-average fair value of $2.29 using a Black-Scholes option pricing model and the following assumptions: dividend yield of 6.79%, risk-free interest rate of 0.95%, expected volatility of 17.71%, and expected lives of the options of three years. For options granted during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002, the Company estimated a fair value per option on the date of grant of $1.40 using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the following assumptions: dividend yield of 8.17%, risk-free interest rate of 2.02%, expected volatility of 25.8%, and expected lives of the options of three years.
A summary of the status of the Company’s 2001 Plan for September 30, 2002 through September 30, 2004 is as follows:
|
|
|
Shares |
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding at September 30, 2002, of which 741,664 shares were exercisable |
|
811,664 |
|
$ |
15.40 |
|
|
Granted |
|
180,000 |
|
$ |
17.10 |
|
|
Exercised |
|
(10,000 |
) |
$ |
15.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding at September 30, 2003, of which 841,664 shares were exercisable |
|
981,664 |
|
$ |
15.71 |
|
|
Granted |
|
325,500 |
|
$ |
22.20 |
|
|
Exercised |
|
(46,666 |
) |
$ |
15.15 |
|
|
Options outstanding at September 30, 2004, of which 897,496 shares are exercisable |
|
1,260,498 |
|
$ |
17.44 |
|
A detailed summary of the stock options outstanding at fiscal years ended September 30, 2004, September 30, 2003 and September 30, 2002 is presented in the following table:
|
Fiscal Year Ended |
|
Range of Exercise Prices |
|
Stock Options |
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2004 |
|
$15.00 -$22.84 |
|
1,260,498 |
|
7.88 |
|
|
September 30, 2003 |
|
$15.00 -$19.56 |
|
981,664 |
|
8.33 |
|
|
September 30, 2002 |
|
$15.00 - $17.18 |
|
811,664 |
|
9.08 |
|
During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004, the Company issued 46,666 shares of common stock to three employees pursuant to a stock option exercise, in exchange for cash of $157,100 and two full recourse notes receivable of $549,990. During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003, the Company issued 10,000 shares of common stock to an employee pursuant to a stock option exercise, in exchange for a full recourse note receivable of $150,000. During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002, the Company issued 11,666 shares of common stock to employees of the Company pursuant to stock option exercises, in exchange for full recourse notes receivable totaling $185,890. These transactions were effected pursuant to the 2001 Plan, which allows the Company to lend its employees funds to pay for the exercise of stock options. All loans made under this arrangement are fully secured by the value of the common stock purchased. Interest is charged and paid on such loans at the market rate as determined based on individual financial positions.
55
Note 5. Commitments and Contingencies
The Company occupies its McLean, Virginia office space pursuant to a license agreement scheduled to expire on October 31, 2004. The Company’s New York City office facility has a service agreement scheduled to expire August 31, 2005. During May 2004, the Company also entered into a service agreement for the Chicago, Illinois office which is scheduled to expire on June 30, 2005. The Company also entered into signed term sheets for the two potential investments for the Company’s portfolio. The future scheduled contractual payments at September 30, 2004 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Payment Due by Period |
|
|||||||||||
|
Contractual Obligations |
|
Total |
|
Less than 1 Year |
|
1-3 Years |
|
3-5 Years |
|
More than 5 |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Office Lease Obligations |
|
57,696 |
|
57,696 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Investments |
|
13,450,000 |
|
13,450,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Total |
|
$ |
13,507,696 |
|
$ |
13,507,696 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
— |
|
Effective October 1, 2004, the Company assigned all of the outstanding leases for each of these facilities to Gladstone Management Corporation.
Note 6. Net Increase (Decrease) in Stockholders’ Equity Resulting from Operations per Share
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net increase (decrease) in stockholders’ equity resulting from operations per share for the fiscal year ended September 2004, September 30, 2003, and September 30, 2002:
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Numerator for basic and diluted net increase in stockholders’ equity resulting from operation per share |
|
$ |
10,570,290 |
|
$ |
11,073,581 |
|
$ |
7,616,601 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Denominator for basic weighted average shares |
|
10,101,341 |
|
10,072,677 |
|
10,064,900 |
|
|||
|
Dilutive effect of stock options |
|
243,047 |
|
115,811 |
|
101,852 |
|
|||
|
Denominator for diluted weighted average shares |
|
10,344,388 |
|
10,188,488 |
|
10,166,752 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Basic net increase in stockholers’ equity resulting from operations per share |
|
$ |
1.05 |
|
$ |
1.10 |
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Diluted net increase in stockholers’ equity resulting from operations per share |
|
$ |
1.02 |
|
$ |
1.09 |
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
Note 7. Related Party Transactions
The Company has provided loans to employees for the exercise of options under the 2001 Plan. The loans require the quarterly payment of interest at the market rate of interest in effect at the date of issue, have varying terms not exceeding nine years and have been recorded as a reduction of stockholders’ equity. The loans are evidenced by full recourse notes that are due upon maturity or 60 days following termination of employment, and the shares of common stock purchased with the proceeds of the loan are posted as collateral. During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004, the Company issued $549,990 in loans to two employees for the exercise of options and received the full repayment of a loan that was issued during fiscal year 2002. During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003, the Company issued a $150,000 loan to an employee for the exercise of options and received the final payment for a loan issued during fiscal year 2001. During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002, the Company issued $185,890 in loans to two employees for the exercise of options. The Company recognized interest income from all employee stock option loans of $443,658, $437,737, and $433,391 during the fiscal years ended September 30, 2004, September 30, 2003 and September 30, 2002, respectively. The outstanding principal balances due on all employee stock option loans at September 30, 2004, September 30, 2003, and September 30, 2002 were $9,432,678, $8,985,940, and $8,983,796, respectively.
56
During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003, the Company paid personnel recruiting fees totaling $2,269 to Snelling & Associates and $4,625 to Medical Funding Corporation. Anthony W. Parker, a director of the Company is the President of Snelling & Associates and is the founder, Chairman and President of Medical Funding Corporation. During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002, the Company paid personnel recruiting fees totaling $31,750 to Medical Funding Corporation. There were no such transactions during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004.
On July 1, 2004, the Company sold its fixed assets at cost, net of accumulated depreciation to Gladstone Management.
Note 8. Repurchase Agreement
On September 29, 2004, the Company entered into a repurchase agreement (the “Repurchase Agreement”) with Ferris Baker Watts for $44,984,950. On September 30, 2004, this amount was reduced to $21,345,997 with the application of the net proceeds from the public offering of common stock. This remaining balance was settled on October 1, 2004. The Repurchase Agreement was recorded at cost and was fully collateralized by a United States Treasury Bill with a fair value of $50,000,000, a carrying value of $49,984,950 that matured on October 7, 2004 and earned interest of $2,133. The interest rate on the Repurchase Agreement was 4.25% for a cost of $7,831.
On September 30, 2003, the Company entered into a repurchase agreement with UBS for $78,449,000, which agreement was settled on October 1, 2003. The agreement was recorded at cost and was fully collateralized by a United States Treasury Bill with a fair value of $80,050,000 and a carrying value of $80,022,249 that matured on October 16, 2003. The interest rate on the agreement was 0.80% for a cost of $2,397.
A repurchase agreement involves the purchase by an investor, such as the Company, of a specified security and the simultaneous agreement by the seller to repurchase it at an agreed-upon future date and at a price which is greater than the purchase price by an amount that reflects an agreed-upon interest rate. Such interest rate is effective for the period of time during which the investor’s money is invested in the arrangement and is related to current market interest rates rather than the coupon rate on the purchased security. The Company requires the continual maintenance by its custodian or the correspondent in its account with the Federal Reserve/Treasury Book Entry System of underlying securities. In the future the Company plans to use a similar form of repurchase agreement as an investment option or in order to satisfy certain asset diversification requirements and maintain the Company’s status as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code.
Note 9. Dividends
The following table illustrates the 2004 fiscal year monthly dividends per share and the 2003 and 2002 fiscal year quarterly dividends per share:
57
|
Fiscal Year |
|
Record Date |
|
Payment Date |
|
Dividend |
|
Monthly |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
September 17, 2004 |
|
September 30, 2004 |
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
Monthly |
|
|
|
|
August 18, 2004 |
|
August 31, 2004 |
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
Monthly |
|
|
|
|
July 19, 2004 |
|
July 30, 2004 |
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
Monthly |
|
|
|
|
June 17, 2004 |
|
June 30, 2004 |
|
$ |
0.115 |
|
Monthly |
|
|
|
|
May 17, 2004 |
|
May 28, 2004 |
|
$ |
0.115 |
|
Monthly |
|
|
|
|
April 19, 2004 |
|
April 30, 2004 |
|
$ |
0.115 |
|
Monthly |
|
|
|
|
March 18, 2004 |
|
March 31, 2004 |
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
Monthly |
|
|
|
|
February 16, 2004 |
|
February 27, 2004 |
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
Monthly |
|
|
|
|
January 19, 2004 |
|
January 30, 2004 |
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
Monthly |
|
|
|
|
December 18, 2003 |
|
December 31, 2003 |
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
Monthly |
|
|
|
|
November 17, 2003 |
|
November 28, 2003 |
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
Monthly |
|
|
|
|
October 20, 2003 |
|
October 31, 2003 |
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
Monthly |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 |
|
September 30, 2003 |
|
October 6, 2003 |
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
Quarterly |
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2003 |
|
July 7, 2003 |
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
Quarterly |
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2003 |
|
April 7, 2003 |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
Quarterly |
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2002 |
|
January 7, 2003 |
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
Quarterly |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002 |
|
September 30, 2002 |
|
October 7, 2002 |
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
Quarterly |
|
|
|
|
June 28, 2002 |
|
July 8, 2002 |
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
Quarterly |
|
|
|
|
March 28, 2002 |
|
April 8, 2002 |
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
Quarterly |
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2001 |
|
January 15, 2002 |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
Quarterly |
|
Aggregate dividends declared and paid for the 2004 fiscal year were approximately $13.8 million which were declared based on an estimate of net investment income for the year. Since net investment income was lower than projected, due to the expensing of certain prepaid assets associated with financing fees surrounding the line of credit, it lead to dividends exceeding net investment income for the year by approximately $0.5 million. Therefore, a portion of the 2004 dividends will be treated as a return of capital to the Company’s stockholders.
Aggregate dividends declared and paid for the 2002 fiscal year were approximately $8.2 million. The Company declared these dividends based upon an estimate of net investment income for the year. Because of the difficult economic climate during the year, the Company’s investment pace was slower than originally anticipated, and consequently, net investment income was lower than originally projected. This resulted in dividends related to the 2002 fiscal year exceeding net investment income for the year by approximately $0.5 million. Additionally, dividends related to the 2002 fiscal year exceeded current and accumulated earnings and profits and, as a result, a portion of the Company’s dividends were treated as a return of capital to the Company’s stockholders.
Note 10. Managerial Assistance Fees
The 1940 Act requires that a business development company make available managerial assistance to its portfolio companies. The Company provides managerial assistance to its portfolio companies through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Gladstone Capital Advisers, Inc. The Company receives fee income for managerial assistance it renders to portfolio companies in connection with its investments. Such fees are normally paid at the closing of the Company’s investments and are generally non-recurring. These managerial assistance services vary by investment, but generally consist of reviewing existing credit facilities, arranging bank financing, arranging equity financing, structuring financing from multiple lenders, structuring financing from equity investors, restructuring existing loans, raising equity and debt capital, and providing general financial advice. Subsequent to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004, these services will be provided by Gladstone Management. For the fiscal years ended September 30, 2004, September 30, 2003 and September 30, 2002, these fees totaled $1,118,106, $885,500 and $1,673,614, respectively.
58
From time to time, the Company is invited to participate as a co-lender in a transaction. In the event that the Company does not provide significant managerial assistance services in connection with its investment, loan fees paid to the Company in such situations are deferred and amortized over the life of the loan. The Company did not receive any such loan fees during the fiscal years ended September 30, 2004, September 30, 2003, and September 30, 2002.
Note 11. Lines of Credit
In June 2004, the Company entered into a $15.0 million line of credit agreement with Branch Banking and Trust Company (“BB&T Agreement”) which matures on June 1, 2005. Interest on outstanding borrowings is based upon the one month London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus 2.5% per annum. The unused portion of the line of credit is subject to a fee of 0.2% per annum. The BB&T Agreement requires the Company to meet and maintain certain covenants and ratios with respect to leverage and liquidity. As of September 30, 2004, there was $15.0 million outstanding under the BB&T line of credit at an interest rate of 4.34%. At September 30, 2004 the Company was in compliance with all covenants under the BB&T Agreement.
Through its wholly-owned subsidiary Gladstone Business Loan LLC (“Business Loan”), the Company has obtained a $100 million revolving credit facility. On May 19, 2003, the Company executed a Purchase and Sale Agreement pursuant to which it agreed to sell certain loans to Business Loan in consideration of a membership interest therein. Simultaneously, Business Loan executed a Credit Agreement with CIBC World Markets Inc. (“CIBC”), as administrative agent, and others, pursuant to which Business Loan pledged the loans purchased from the Company to secure future advances by certain institutional lenders. On September 28, 2004, CIBC assigned its interest in the credit facility to Deutsche Bank AG, which expires on May 31, 2005 and can be extended at the option of Deutsche Bank AG. Interest rates charged on the advances under the facility are based on LIBOR, the Prime Rate or the Federal Funds Rate, depending on market conditions, and adjusts periodically. As of September 30, 2004, the outstanding principal balance under this credit facility was approximately $25.7 million at an interest rate of 3.29%.
The facility contains covenants that require Business Loan to maintain its status as a separate entity; prohibit certain significant corporate transactions (such as mergers, consolidations, liquidations or dissolutions); and restrict material changes to the Company’s credit and collection policies. The facility also restricts some of the terms and provisions (including interest rates, terms to maturity and payments schedules) and limits the borrower and industry concentrations of loans that are eligible to secure advances. As of September 30, 2004, Business Loan was in compliance with all of the facility covenants. The Company currently intends to securitize all of the loans held by Business Loan and will use the proceeds from the securitization to pay down any amounts then outstanding under the revolving credit facility.
Gladstone Management, the Company’s affiliated servicing entity, services the loans pledged under the facility. As a condition to this servicing arrangement, the Company executed a Performance Guaranty pursuant to which it guaranteed that Management would comply fully with all of its obligations under the facility. The Performance Guaranty requires the Company to maintain a minimum net worth of $100 million and to maintain “asset coverage” with respect to “senior securities representing indebtedness” of at least 200%, in accordance with Section 18 of the 1940 Act. As of September 30, 2004, the Company was in compliance with all covenants under the Performance Guaranty.
Note 12. Interest Rate Cap Agreement
Pursuant to the CIBC World Markets, Inc. line of credit, the Company agreed to enter into hedging transactions, and as such purchased an interest rate cap agreement in February 2004 as a result of borrowings under the line of credit. The transaction effectively limits the interest rate on a portion of these borrowings.
The use of a cap involves risks that are different from those associated with ordinary portfolio securities transactions. Cap agreements may be considered to be illiquid. Although the Company will not enter into any such agreements unless it believes that the other party to the transaction is creditworthy, the Company does bear the risk of loss of the amount expected to be received under such agreements in the event of default or bankruptcy of the agreement counterparty.
59
In February 2004, the Company entered into an interest rate cap agreement with a notional amount of $35.0 million at a cost of $304,000 and a current fair value of approximately $89,741 which is recorded in other assets on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2004. The Company records changes in the fair value of the interest rate cap agreement monthly based on the current market valuation at month end as unrealized depreciation or appreciation on derivative on the Company’s consolidated statement of operations. The interest rate cap agreement expires in February 2009. The agreement provides that the Company’s floating interest rate or cost of funds on a portion of the portfolio’s borrowings will be capped at 5% when the LIBOR rate is in excess of 5%.
Note 13. Deferred Compensation Plan
The Company has adopted a deferred compensation plan (the 401(k) Plan) effective January 1, 2002. The 401(k) Plan permits an employee to defer the lesser of 75% of his or her total annual compensation or the applicable Internal Revenue Service (IRS) annual limit. Employees of the Company are eligible to participate in the 401(k) Plan upon completion of 1,000 hours of service within the first six months of employment or after one year of service. The service requirement has been waived for those employees who were employed by the Company as of January 1, 2002. As of September 30, 2004, the Company funded $50,630 and as of September 30, 2003, the Company funded $23,987 in contributions to the 401(k) Plan. The Company has received a determination letter from the IRS concurring that the deferred compensation plan satisfies the qualification requirements of the Code. For the fiscal years ended September 30, 2004, September 30, 2003 and September 30, 2002, the Company recorded $48,502, $48,877 and $23,569, respectively, in expenses related to the 401(k) Plan.
Note 14. Subsequent Events
In October 2004, the Company sold its entire interest in Burt’s Bees, Inc. for a premium of $9,750. In November 2004, the Company purchased a $9.0 million syndicated participation in Tech Lighting Inc. and an $8.0 million syndicated participation in Valor Telecommunications, Inc. and funded new loans to Global Materials Technology, Inc. for $5.5 million and to Santana Products, Inc. for $7.95 million. The Company received full repayments of two investments: America’s Water Heater Rentals repaid its entire loan of $12.0 million and remitted exit costs of $1,440,000 and A and G, Inc. repaid its entire loan of $12.25 million.
60
Note 15. Financial Highlights
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
Year Ended |
|
Year Ended |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Per Share Data (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Net asset value at beginning of period |
|
$ |
12.97 |
|
$ |
12.97 |
|
$ |
13.05 |
|
|
Income from investment operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Net investment income (4) |
|
1.32 |
|
1.12 |
|
0.76 |
|
|||
|
Realized gain on sale of investment (4) |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|||
|
Net unrealized gain/(loss) on investments (4) |
|
(0.25 |
) |
(0.02 |
) |
— |
|
|||
|
Net unrealized (loss) on derivatives (4) |
|
(0.02 |
) |
— |
|
— |
|
|||
|
Total from investment operations |
|
1.05 |
|
1.10 |
|
0.76 |
|
|||
|
Less distributions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Distributions from net investment income |
|
(1.25 |
) |
(1.10 |
) |
(0.76 |
) |
|||
|
Tax return of capital distribution |
|
(0.12 |
) |
— |
|
(0.05 |
) |
|||
|
Total distributions |
|
(1.37 |
) |
(1.10 |
) |
(0.81 |
) |
|||
|
Issuance of common stock under shelf offering |
|
0.99 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|||
|
Issuance of common stock under stock option plan |
|
0.01 |
|
— |
|
(0.02 |
) |
|||
|
Offering costs and underwriting discount |
|
(0.16 |
) |
— |
|
(0.01 |
) |
|||
|
Repayment of principal on notes receivable |
|
0.01 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|||
|
Net asset value at end of period |
|
$ |
13.50 |
|
$ |
12.97 |
|
$ |
12.97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Per share market value at beginning of period |
|
$ |
19.45 |
|
$ |
16.88 |
|
$ |
16.14 |
|
|
Per share market value at end of period |
|
22.71 |
|
19.45 |
|
16.88 |
|
|||
|
Total Return (2)(3) |
|
24.40 |
% |
21.74 |
% |
9.60 |
% |
|||
|
Shares outstanding at end of period |
|
11,278,510 |
|
10,081,844 |
|
10,071,844 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Net assets at end of period |
|
$ |
152,226,655 |
|
$ |
130,802,382 |
|
$ |
130,663,273 |
|
|
Average net assets |
|
$ |
130,385,129 |
|
$ |
132,196,505 |
|
$ |
130,984,674 |
|
|
Ratio of expenses to average net assets |
|
5.45 |
% |
2.92 |
% |
2.17 |
% |
|||
|
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets |
|
10.20 |
% |
8.38 |
% |
5.81 |
% |
|||
(1) Basic per share data.
(2) For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004, the total return equals the increase of the ending market value over the beginning market value plus monthly dividends divided by the monthly beginning market value, assuming monthly dividend reinvestment. For fiscal years ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, total return equals the increase of the ending market value over the beginning market value, plus distributions, divided by the beginning market value, assuming quarterly dividend reinvestment.
(3) Amounts were not annualized.
(4) Weighted average basic per share data was used.
61
Note 16. Selected Quarterly Data (Unaudited)
|
|
|
Year Ended September 30, 2004 |
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
Quarter Ended |
|
Quarter Ended |
|
Quarter Ended |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Total Investment Income |
|
$ |
3,967,949 |
|
$ |
4,367,920 |
|
$ |
6,709,810 |
|
$ |
5,350,289 |
|
|
Net Investment Income |
|
2,938,636 |
|
3,121,558 |
|
4,730,631 |
|
2,501,950 |
|
||||
|
Net Increase in Stockholders’ Equity Resulting From Operations |
|
1,381,074 |
|
2,828,583 |
|
5,609,893 |
|
750,740 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Basic Earnings per Common Share |
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
$ |
0.56 |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
Diluted Earning per Common Share |
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
|
|
Year Ended September 30, 2003 |
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
Quarter Ended |
|
Quarter Ended |
|
Quarter Ended |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Total Investment Income |
|
$ |
3,235,432 |
|
$ |
3,859,293 |
|
$ |
4,059,744 |
|
$ |
4,000,405 |
|
|
Net Investment Income |
|
2,412,154 |
|
2,919,591 |
|
3,115,736 |
|
2,848,440 |
|
||||
|
Net Increase in Stockholders’ Equity Resulting From Operations |
|
2,412,154 |
|
3,662,015 |
|
2,370,899 |
|
2,628,513 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Basic Earnings per Common Share |
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
Diluted Earning per Common Share |
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
62
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
On December 19, 2002, we dismissed Ernst & Young LLP (“Ernst & Young”) as our independent auditor and on December 19, 2002 engaged PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) as its new independent auditor for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2003. Our decision to change auditors was made by our Audit Committee.
Ernst & Young’s reports on our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002 and the period from May 30, 2001 (inception) through September 30, 2001 did not contain an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, nor were they qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles.
In connection with the audits of our financial statements for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002 and the period from May 30, 2001 (inception) through September 30, 2001, and in the subsequent interim period, there were no disagreements with Ernst & Young on any matters of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope and procedures which, if not resolved to the satisfaction of Ernst & Young, would have caused Ernst & Young to make reference to the matter in its report. There were no “reportable events” as that term is described in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.
We have requested Ernst & Young to furnish a letter addressed to the SEC stating whether it agrees with the above statements. A copy of that letter, dated December 20, 2002, is filed as Exhibit 16.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 20, 2002.
During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002 and the period from May 30, 2001 (inception) through September 30, 2001, and through the date of the engagement of PwC, we did not consult PwC with respect to the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on our consolidated financial statements, or regarding any other matters or reportable events described under Item 304(a)(2)(i) and (ii) of Regulation S-K.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.
As of September 30, 2004 (the end of the period covered by this report), we, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective in timely alerting management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of material information about us required to be included in periodic SEC filings. However, in evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Item 9B. Other Information.
Not applicable.
63
PART III
We will file a definitive Proxy Statement for our 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “2005 Proxy Statement”) with the SEC, pursuant to Regulation 14A, not later than 120 days after the end of our fiscal year. Accordingly, certain information required by Part III has been omitted under General Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K. Only those sections of the 2005 Proxy Statement that specifically address the items set forth herein are incorporated by reference.
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
The information required by Item 10 is hereby incorporated by reference from our 2005 Proxy Statement under the captions “Election of Directors” and “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance.” All members of the Audit Committee have been designated by the Board of Directors as financial experts.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
The information required by Item 11 is hereby incorporated by reference from our 2005 Proxy Statement under the caption “Compensation of Directors and Executive Officers.”
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
The information required by Item 12 is hereby incorporated by reference from our 2005 Proxy Statement under the caption “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.”
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
The information required by Item 13 is hereby incorporated by reference from our 2005 Proxy Statement under the caption “Certain Transactions.”
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
The information required by Item 14 is hereby incorporated by reference from our 2005 Proxy Statement under the caption “Audit Fees.”
64
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K
a. DOCUMENTS FILED AS PART OF THIS REPORT
1. The following financial statements are filed herewith:
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2004 and September 30, 2003 |
|
|
Consolidated Schedule of Investments as of September 30, 2004 |
|
|
Consolidated Schedule of Investments as of September 30, 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Financial statement schedules
No financial statement schedules are filed herewith because (1) such schedules are not required or (2) the information has been presented in the aforementioned financial statements.
3. Exhibits
The following exhibits are filed as part of this report or hereby incorporated by reference to exhibits previously filed with the SEC:
|
3.1 |
|
Articles of Amendment and Restatement of the Articles of Incorporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit a.2 to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form N-2 (File No. 333-63700), filed July 27, 2001. |
|
3.2 |
|
By-laws, incorporated by reference to Exhibit b to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form N-2 (File No. 333-63700), filed July 27, 2001. |
|
3.3 |
|
Amendment to By-laws, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 814-00237), filed February 117, 2004. |
|
4.1 |
|
Form of Direct Registration Transaction Advice for the Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share, the rights of holders of which are defined in exhibits 3.1 and 3.2, incorporated by reference to Exhibit d to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form N-2 (File No. 333-63700), filed July 27, 2001. |
|
4.2 |
|
Specimen Stock Certificate, incorporated by reference to Exhibit d.2 to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 3 to the Registration Statement on Form N-2 (File No. 333-63700), filed August 23, 2001. |
|
10.1* |
|
Employment Agreement, dated June 25, 2001, between the Company and David Gladstone, incorporated by reference to Exhibit k.2 to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form N-2 (File No. 333-63700), filed July 27, 2001. |
|
10.2* |
|
Employment Agreement, dated July 23, 2001, between the Company and Terry Lee Brubaker, incorporated by reference to Exhibit k.3 to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form N-2 (File No. 333-63700), filed July 27, 2001. |
|
10.3* |
|
Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated August 8, 2001, between the Company and David Gladstone, incorporated by reference to Exhibit k.4 to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form N-2 (File No. 333-63700), filed August 10, 2001. |
|
10.4* |
|
Employment Agreement, dated September 12, 2002, between the Company and George Stelljes III, incorporated by reference to Exhibit k.5 to Registration Statement on Form N-2 (File No. 333-100385), filed October 7, 2002. |
|
10.5 |
|
Promissory Note of David Gladstone in favor of the Company, dated August 23, 2001, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2001, filed October 4, 2001. |
|
10.6 |
|
Promissory Note of Terry Brubaker in favor of the Company, dated August 23, 2001, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2001, filed October 4, 2001. |
|
10.7 |
|
Promissory Note of Harry Brill in favor of the Company, dated August 23, 2001, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2001, filed October 4, 2001. |
|
10.8 |
|
Subscription Agreement dated May 30, 2001, incorporated by reference to Exhibit p to the Registration Statement on Form N-2 (File No. 333-63700), filed June 22, 2001. |
|
10.9* |
|
Investment Advisory and Administrative Agreement dated as of October 1, 2004 between the Company and Gladstone Management Corporation. |
|
10.10* |
|
Amended and Restated 2001 Equity Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit i.1 to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form N-2 (File No. 333-63700), filed July 27, 2001. |
|
10.11* |
|
First Amendment to Amended and Restated 2001 Equity Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit i.3 to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form N-2 (File No. 333-63700), filed August 10, 2001. |
|
10.12* |
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit i.2 to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form N-2 (File No. 333-63700), filed July 27, 2001. |
|
10.13* |
|
Form of Early Exercise Stock Purchase Agreement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit i.4 to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 3 to the Registration Statement on Form N-2 (File No. 333-63700), filed August 23, 2001. |
|
10.14* |
|
Second Amendment to Amended and Restated 2001 Equity Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit i.5 to the Registration Statement on Form N-2 (File No. 333-100385), filed October 7, 2002. |
|
10.15* |
|
Third Amendment to Amended and Restated 2001 Equity Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit i.6 to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form N-2 (File No. 333-100385), filed February 28, 2003. |
|
10.16 |
|
Credit Agreement dated as of May 19, 2003 between Gladstone Business Loan LLC and CIBC World Markets Corporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 (File No. 814-00237), filed August 14, 2003. |
|
10.17 |
|
Amendment No. 1 to Credit Agreement dated as of September 17, 2003, incorporated by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003 (File No. 814-00237), filed December 11, 2003. |
|
10.18 |
|
Facility License Agreement, dated November 1, 2003, between the Company and Teqcorner LLC, incorporated by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003 (File No. 814-00237), filed December 11, 2003. |
|
10.19 |
|
Amendment No. 2 to Credit Agreement dated as of February 6, 2004, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 (File No. 814-00237), filed May 13, 2004. |
|
10.20 |
|
Amendment No. 3 to Credit Agreement dated as of May 28, 2004, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 (File No. 814-00237), filed August 10, 2004. |
|
10.21 |
|
Second Amendment to Employment Agreement dated July 15, 2003 between the Company and David Gladstone, incorporated by reference to Exhibit k.14 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form N-2 (File No. 333-100385), filed July 15, 2004. |
|
10.22 |
|
Amendment to Employment Agreement dated July 15, 2003 between the Company and Terry Lee Brubaker, incorporated by reference to Exhibit k.15 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form N-2 (File No. 333-100385), filed July 15, 2004. |
|
10.23 |
|
Amendment to Employment Agreement dated July 15, 2003 between the Company and George Stelljes III, incorporated by reference to Exhibit k.16 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form N-2 (File No. 333-100385), filed July 15, 2004. |
|
10.24 |
|
Third Amendment to Employment Agreement dated April 22, 2004 between the Company and David Gladstone, incorporated by reference to Exhibit k.17 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form N-2 (File No. 333-100385), filed July 15, 2004. |
|
10.25 |
|
Second Amendment to Employment Agreement dated May 6, 2004 between the Company and Terry Lee Brubaker, incorporated by reference to Exhibit k.18 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form N-2 (File No. 333-100385), filed July 15, 2004. |
|
10.26 |
|
Second Amendment to Employment Agreement dated May 6, 2004 between the Company and George Stelljes III, incorporated by reference to Exhibit k.19 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form N-2 (File No. 333-100385), filed July 15, 2004. |
|
10.27 |
|
Loan Agreement dated as of June 22, 2004 between the Company and Branch Banking and Trust Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit k.20 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form N-2 (File No. 333-100385), filed July 15, 2004. |
|
10.28 |
|
Amendment No. 4 to Credit Agreement dated as of September 28, 2004, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File no. 814-00237), filed on October 1, 2004. |
|
11 |
|
Computation of Per Share Earnings (included in the notes to the audited financial statements contained in this report). |
|
21 |
|
Subsidiaries of the Registrant. |
|
23.1 |
|
Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. |
|
23.2 |
|
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP. |
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to section 302 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to section 302 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
32.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
32.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
* Denotes management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
65
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
GLADSTONE CAPITAL CORPORATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: December 14, 2004 |
By: |
/s/ HARRY BRILL |
|
|
|
Harry Brill |
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacity and on the dates indicated.
|
Date: December 14, 2004 |
By: |
/s/ DAVID GLADSTONE |
|
|
|
David Gladstone |
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors (principal executive officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: December 14, 2004 |
By: |
/s/ TERRY LEE BRUBAKER |
|
|
|
Terry Lee Brubaker |
|
|
|
Vice Chairman, Chief Operating Officer and Director |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: December 14, 2004 |
By: |
/s/ HARRY BRILL |
|
|
|
Harry Brill |
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: December 14, 2004 |
By: |
/s/ GEORGE STELLJES, III |
|
|
|
George Stelljes, III |
|
|
|
President, Chief Investment Officer and Director |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: December 14, 2004 |
By: |
/s/ DAVID A.R. DULLUM |
|
|
|
David A.R. Dullum |
|
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: December 14, 2004 |
By: |
/s/ ANTHONY W. PARKER |
|
|
|
Anthony W. Parker |
|
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: December 14, 2004 |
By: |
/s/ MICHELA A. ENGLISH |
|
|
|
Michela A. English |
|
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: December 14, 2004 |
By: |
/s/ PAUL ADELGREN |
|
|
|
Paul Adelgren |
|
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: December 14, 2004 |
By: |
/s/ MAURICE COULON |
|
|
|
Maurice Coulon |
|
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: December 14, 2004 |
By: |
/s/ JOHN OUTLAND |
|
|
|
John Outland |
|
|
|
Director |
66