SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
ý Quarterly Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended October 31, 2004.
or
o Transition Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the transition period from to .
Commission file number: 001-31337
CANTEL MEDICAL CORP.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware |
|
22-1760285 |
(State or other jurisdiction of |
|
(I.R.S. employer |
incorporation or organization) |
|
identification no.) |
|
|
|
150 Clove Road, Little Falls, New Jersey |
|
07424 |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
(Zip code) |
|
|
|
(973) 890-7220 |
||
Registrants telephone number, including area code |
Indicate by check mark whether registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to the filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ý No o
Number of shares of Common Stock outstanding as of November 30, 2004: 9,791,775
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. - FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CANTEL MEDICAL CORP.
(Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Share Data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
October 31, |
|
July 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2004 |
|
||||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
19,174 |
|
$ |
17,862 |
|
||
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,081 at October 31 and $1,372 at July 31 |
|
28,084 |
|
29,324 |
|
||||
Inventories: |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Raw materials |
|
7,499 |
|
6,632 |
|
||||
Work-in-process |
|
2,377 |
|
2,065 |
|
||||
Finished goods |
|
14,116 |
|
13,756 |
|
||||
Total inventories |
|
23,992 |
|
22,453 |
|
||||
Deferred income taxes |
|
3,408 |
|
2,806 |
|
||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
2,138 |
|
1,418 |
|
||||
Total current assets |
|
76,796 |
|
73,863 |
|
||||
Property and equipment, net |
|
22,930 |
|
22,715 |
|
||||
Intangible assets, net |
|
14,145 |
|
13,897 |
|
||||
Goodwill |
|
34,373 |
|
33,330 |
|
||||
Other assets |
|
2,470 |
|
2,562 |
|
||||
|
|
$ |
150,714 |
|
$ |
146,367 |
|
||
Liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
$ |
3,500 |
|
$ |
3,000 |
|
||
Accounts payable |
|
10,663 |
|
10,325 |
|
||||
Compensation payable |
|
3,623 |
|
3,450 |
|
||||
Accrued expenses |
|
8,862 |
|
7,403 |
|
||||
Income taxes payable |
|
1,146 |
|
2,950 |
|
||||
Total current liabilities |
|
27,794 |
|
27,128 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Long-term debt |
|
17,750 |
|
22,000 |
|
||||
Deferred income taxes |
|
9,845 |
|
7,533 |
|
||||
Other long-term liabilities |
|
3,258 |
|
3,195 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Preferred Stock, par value $1.00 per share; authorized 1,000,000 shares; none issued |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Common Stock, $.10 par value; authorized 20,000,000 shares; October 31 - 10,067,388 shares issued and 9,774,160 shares outstanding; July 31 - 10,034,382 shares issued and 9,741,154 shares outstanding |
|
1,007 |
|
1,003 |
|
||||
Additional capital |
|
54,225 |
|
53,817 |
|
||||
Retained earnings |
|
33,300 |
|
30,193 |
|
||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
5,182 |
|
3,145 |
|
||||
Treasury Stock, at cost; October 31 and July 31 - 293,228 shares |
|
(1,647 |
) |
(1,647 |
) |
||||
Total stockholders equity |
|
92,067 |
|
86,511 |
|
||||
|
|
$ |
150,714 |
|
$ |
146,367 |
|
||
See accompanying notes.
1
CANTEL MEDICAL CORP.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three Months Ended October 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||
Net sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Product sales |
|
$ |
39,827 |
|
$ |
31,905 |
|
Product service |
|
5,515 |
|
4,944 |
|
||
Total net sales |
|
45,342 |
|
36,849 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cost of sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Product sales |
|
24,562 |
|
20,392 |
|
||
Product service |
|
3,565 |
|
3,284 |
|
||
Total cost of sales |
|
28,127 |
|
23,676 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Gross profit |
|
17,215 |
|
13,173 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Selling |
|
5,408 |
|
4,700 |
|
||
General and administrative |
|
5,450 |
|
4,174 |
|
||
Research and development |
|
984 |
|
1,070 |
|
||
Total operating expenses |
|
11,842 |
|
9,944 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Income before interest, other income and income taxes |
|
5,373 |
|
3,229 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Interest expense |
|
429 |
|
452 |
|
||
Interest income |
|
(78 |
) |
(23 |
) |
||
Other income |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Income before income taxes |
|
5,022 |
|
2,814 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Income taxes |
|
1,915 |
|
1,019 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net income |
|
$ |
3,107 |
|
$ |
1,795 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Earnings per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Basic |
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
See accompanying notes.
2
CANTEL MEDICAL CORP.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollar Amounts in Thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three Months Ended October 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net income |
|
$ |
3,107 |
|
$ |
1,795 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
1,119 |
|
1,120 |
|
||
Amortization of debt issuance costs |
|
161 |
|
132 |
|
||
Loss on disposal of fixed assets |
|
14 |
|
|
|
||
Deferred income taxes |
|
978 |
|
329 |
|
||
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Accounts receivable |
|
2,504 |
|
1,450 |
|
||
Inventories |
|
(465 |
) |
638 |
|
||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
(661 |
) |
(933 |
) |
||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
(536 |
) |
(2,759 |
) |
||
Income taxes payable |
|
(1,867 |
) |
33 |
|
||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
4,354 |
|
1,805 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Capital expenditures |
|
(698 |
) |
(432 |
) |
||
Acquisition of Biolab, net of cash acquired |
|
|
|
(7,782 |
) |
||
Acquisition of Mar Cor, net of cash acquired |
|
|
|
(7,979 |
) |
||
Acquisition of Dyped, net of cash acquired |
|
|
|
(696 |
) |
||
Other, net |
|
(4 |
) |
(285 |
) |
||
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
(702 |
) |
(17,174 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Borrowings under term loan facility |
|
|
|
4,250 |
|
||
Borrowings under revolving credit facilities |
|
|
|
4,800 |
|
||
Repayments under term loan facility |
|
(750 |
) |
(750 |
) |
||
Repayments under revolving credit facilities |
|
(3,000 |
) |
|
|
||
Proceeds from exercises of stock options |
|
398 |
|
74 |
|
||
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
(3,352 |
) |
8,374 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
1,012 |
|
472 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
1,312 |
|
(6,523 |
) |
||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
17,862 |
|
17,018 |
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
19,174 |
|
$ |
10,495 |
|
See accompanying notes.
3
CANTEL MEDICAL CORP.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Basis of Presentation
The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial reporting and the requirements of Form 10-Q and Rule 10.01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include certain information and note disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles for annual financial reporting and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Annual Report of Cantel Medical Corp. (the Company or Cantel) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2004 (the 2004 Form 10-K), and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included elsewhere herein.
The unaudited interim financial statements reflect all adjustments (consisting of a normal and recurring nature) which management considers necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations for these periods. The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year.
The condensed consolidated balance sheet at July 31, 2004 was derived from the audited consolidated balance sheet of the Company at that date.
Cantel had five operating companies (collectively, with Cantel, referred to as the Company) at July 31, 2004. Minntech Corporation (Minntech), Carsen Group Inc. (Carsen), Mar Cor Services, Inc. (Mar Cor), and Saf-T-Pak, Inc. (Saf-T-Pak) are wholly-owned operating subsidiaries of Cantel. Biolab Equipment Ltd. (Biolab) is a wholly-owned operating subsidiary of Carsen.
Minntech designs, develops, manufactures, markets and distributes disinfection/sterilization reprocessing systems, sterilants and other supplies for renal dialysis; filtration and separation products for medical and non-medical applications; and endoscope reprocessing systems, sterilants and other supplies. On September 12, 2003, Minntech acquired the endoscope reprocessing systems and accessory infection control technologies of The Netherlands based Dyped Medical B.V. (Dyped). Minntech also provides technical maintenance services for its products.
Carsen is engaged in the marketing and distribution of endoscopy and surgical, endoscope reprocessing and scientific products in Canada and also provides technical maintenance services for its products.
Biolab and Mar Cor, which were acquired on August 1, 2003, provide water treatment equipment design, project management, installation, maintenance, deionization and mixing systems to the medical, pharmaceutical, biotechnology, research, beverage and semiconductor industries.
Saf-T-Pak, which was acquired on June 1, 2004, provides specialty packaging products and compliance training services for the safe transport of infectious and biological specimens.
4
The acquisitions of Dyped, Biolab, Mar Cor and Saf-T-Pak are more fully described in note 3 to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
During fiscal 2004, the Company changed its internal reporting processes to include Product Service with the corresponding product segments to reflect the way the Company, through its executive management, manages, allocates resources and measures the performance of its businesses. Previously, Product Service was reported as a separate operating segment. All prior period segment results have been restated to reflect this change.
Note 2. Stock-Based Compensation
The Company accounts for its stock option plans using the intrinsic value method under the provisions of Accounting Principal Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (APB 25) and related interpretations. Under the provisions of APB 25, the Company grants stock options with exercise prices at the fair value of the shares at the date of grant and, accordingly, does not recognize compensation expense. If the Company had elected to recognize compensation expense based on the fair value of the options granted at grant date over the vesting period as prescribed by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123, Stock-Based Compensation (SFAS 123), net income and earnings per share would have been as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended October 31, |
|
|||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|||
Net income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
As reported |
|
$ |
3,107,000 |
|
$ |
1,795,000 |
|
|
Stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based model, net of tax |
|
(460,000 |
) |
(317,000 |
) |
|||
Pro forma |
|
$ |
2,647,000 |
|
$ |
1,478,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Earnings per common share - basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
As reported |
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
Pro forma |
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Earnings per common share - diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
As reported |
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
Pro forma |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
The pro forma effect on net income for these periods may not be representative of the pro forma effect on net income in future periods.
The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options which have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions including the expected stock price volatility and the expected life of the option. Because the Companys stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in managements opinion,
5
the existing model does not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of its stock options.
During the three months ended October 31, 2004, 33,006 shares of common stock were issued from the exercise of stock options.
Note 3. Acquisitions
Biolab
On August 1, 2003, the Company acquired all of the issued and outstanding stock of Biolab, a private company in the water treatment industry with historical pre-acquisition annual revenues of approximately $10,000,000. Biolab designs, manufactures, sells and provides maintenance and installation services for high purity water systems for the medical, pharmaceutical, biotechnology, research, beverage and semiconductor industries. Biolab has locations in Oakville, Ontario and Dorval, Quebec.
The total consideration for the transaction, including transaction costs and assumption of debt, was approximately $7,876,000. Under the terms of the purchase agreement, the Company may pay additional consideration at the end of each fiscal year, up to an aggregate of $3,000,000 for the three year period ending July 31, 2006, based upon Biolab achieving specified targets of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA). As of October 31, 2004, none of the additional consideration had been earned.
The purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired and assumed liabilities as follows: current assets $4,230,000; property and equipment $590,000; intangible assets $1,765,000 including current technology $339,000 (10-year life), customer relationships $664,000 (10-year life) and trademarks and tradenames $762,000 (indefinite life); other assets $5,000; current liabilities $1,966,000; and long-term liabilities $1,181,000. The weighted average life of these intangible assets (excluding such assets with an indefinite life) was approximately 10 years. The excess purchase price of $4,433,000 was assigned to goodwill. Such goodwill, all of which is non-deductible for income tax purposes, has been included in the Companys Water Treatment operating segment.
In conjunction with the acquisition of Biolab, Carsen amended its existing Canadian working capital credit facility, as discussed in note 8 to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
Mar Cor
On August 1, 2003, the Company acquired all of the issued and outstanding stock of Mar Cor, a private company in the water treatment industry with historical pre-acquisition annual revenues of approximately $10,000,000. Mar Cor, based in Skippack, Pennsylvania with locations in Atlanta and Chicago, is a service-oriented company providing design, installation, service and maintenance, training and supplies for water and fluid treatment systems to the medical, research, and pharmaceutical industries.
The total consideration for the transaction, including transaction costs and assumption of debt, was approximately $8,215,000.
6
The purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired and assumed liabilities as follows: current assets $3,254,000; property and equipment $947,000; intangible assets $1,483,000 including customer relationships $480,000 (10-year life), covenant-not-to-compete $169,000 (3-year life) and trademarks and tradenames $834,000 (indefinite life); other assets $17,000; current liabilities $2,094,000; and long-term liabilities $636,000. The weighted average life of these intangible assets (excluding such assets with an indefinite life) was approximately 8 years. The excess purchase price of $5,244,000 was assigned to goodwill. Such goodwill, all of which is non-deductible for income tax purposes, has been included in the Companys Water Treatment operating segment.
In conjunction with the acquisition of Mar Cor, the Company amended its existing U.S. credit facilities to fund the cash consideration paid and costs associated with the acquisition, as discussed in note 8 to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
The reasons for the acquisitions of Biolab and Mar Cor were as follows: (i) the overall strategic fit of water treatment with the Companys existing dialysis and filtration technology businesses; (ii) the opportunity to grow the Companys existing businesses and the water treatment business by combining Minntechs sales, marketing, and product development capabilities with Mar Cors regional field service organization and Biolabs water treatment equipment design and manufacturing expertise; (iii) the opportunity to expand and diversify the Companys infection prevention and control business, particularly within the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries; and (iv) the expectation that the acquisitions would be accretive to the Companys earnings per share.
The acquisitions of Biolab and Mar Cor are reflected in the Companys results of operations for the three months ended October 31, 2004 and 2003.
Dyped
On September 12, 2003, the Company acquired the endoscope reprocessing systems and infection control technologies of Dyped, a private company based in The Netherlands. The total consideration for the transaction, including transaction costs, was approximately $1,812,000 and included a note payable in five annual installments with a present value of approximately $1,211,000 (with a face value of $1,505,000). The Company may pay additional purchase price of approximately $557,000 over a three year period contingent upon the achievement of certain research and development objectives. At October 31, 2004, none of the additional purchase price had been earned. The primary reason for the acquisition of Dyped was to expand Minntechs technological capabilities and augment its endoscope reprocessing product line with a new, fully automated reprocessor designed to be compliant with emerging European standards and future market requirements.
The purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired and assumed liabilities as follows: current assets $503,000; property and
7
equipment $14,000; intangible assets $664,000 including current technology $585,000 (8-year life) and customer relationships $79,000 (4-year life); current liabilities $777,000; and long-term liabilities $232,000. The weighted average life of these intangible assets was approximately 7.5 years. The excess purchase price of $1,640,000 was assigned to goodwill. Such goodwill, all of which is non-deductible for income tax purposes, has been included in the Companys Endoscope Reprocessing operating segment.
Dyped is reflected in the Companys results of operations for the portion of the three months ended October 31, 2003 subsequent to its acquisition on September 12, 2003. The acquisition of Dyped did not have a significant impact upon sales and net income for the three months ended October 31, 2004 and 2003.
Saf-T-Pak
On June 1, 2004, the Company acquired all of the issued and outstanding stock of Saf-T-Pak, a private company located in Edmonton, Alberta with annual revenues of approximately $5,000,000 and annual operating income of approximately $1,800,000 for its latest fiscal year ended August 31, 2003. Saf-T-Pak is a designer and manufacturer of specialized packaging for the safe transport of infectious and biological specimens. Saf-T-Pak also offers a full array of compliance training services ranging from software and internet sessions to group seminars and private on-site programs.
The total consideration for the transaction, including transaction costs, was approximately $8,522,000. Under the terms of the purchase agreement, the Company may pay additional consideration at the end of each fiscal year, up to an aggregate of $3,094,000 for the thirty-eight month period ending July 31, 2007, based upon Saf-T-Pak achieving specified targets of EBITDA. At October 31, 2004, none of the additional purchase price had been earned.
The purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired and assumed liabilities as follows: current assets $1,341,000; property and equipment $54,000; intangible assets $3,820,000 including current technology $2,035,000 (9-year weighted average life), customer relationships $1,119,000 (5-year weighted average life), and trademarks and tradenames $666,000 (indefinite life); current liabilities $584,000; and non-current deferred income tax liabilities $1,411,000. The weighted average life of these intangible assets (excluding such assets with an indefinite life) was approximately 7 years. The excess purchase price of $5,302,000 was assigned to goodwill. Such goodwill, all of which is non-deductible for income tax purposes, has been included in the Companys Specialty Packaging operating segment.
The reasons for the acquisition of Saf-T-Pak were as follows: (i) the opportunity to expand and diversify the Companys infection prevention and control business; (ii) the opportunity for Cantel to enter into the specialized packaging market for the transport of infectious and biological substances, which is a market that has undergone recent government regulatory changes creating attractive market dynamics; and (iii) the expectation that the acquisition will be accretive to the Companys earnings per share.
Since the Saf-T-Pak acquisition occurred on June 1, 2004, the
8
results of operations of Saf-T-Pak are included for the three months ended October 31, 2004 and are excluded from the Companys results of operations for the three months ended October 31, 2003.
Selected unaudited pro forma consolidated statements of income data assuming Saf-T-Pak was included in the Companys results of operations as of the beginning of the three month period ended October 31, 2003 is as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended October 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net sales |
|
$ |
45,342,000 |
|
$ |
37,926,000 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
3,107,000 |
|
$ |
1,924,000 |
|
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Basic |
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
Weighted average common shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Basic |
|
9,754,000 |
|
9,314,000 |
|
||
Diluted |
|
10,589,000 |
|
9,889,000 |
|
This pro forma information is provided for illustrative purposes only, and does not necessarily indicate what the operating results of the combined company might have been had the acquisition actually occurred at the beginning of the three months ended October 31, 2003, nor does it necessarily indicate the combined companys future operating results.
The results presented in the selected unaudited pro forma consolidated statements of income data have been prepared using the following assumptions: (i) cost of sales reflects a step-up in the cost basis of Saf-T-Paks inventories; (ii) amortization of intangible assets based upon the final appraised fair values and useful lives of such assets; (iii) interest expense on the senior bank debt at an effective interest rate of 5% per annum; (iv) bonuses for former owners which relate to distributions of earnings have been decreased to be consistent with Cantels management incentive bonus structure; and (v) calculation of the income tax effects of the pro forma adjustments. All other operating results reflect actual performance.
In conjunction with the acquisition of Saf-T-Pak, Cantel amended its existing U.S. Revolving Credit Facility, as discussed in note 8 to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
There were no in-process research and development projects acquired in connection with the Biolab, Mar Cor, Dyped and Saf-T-Pak acquisitions.
Certain of the assumed liabilities relating to the Biolab, Mar Cor, Dyped and Saf-T-Pak acquisitions are subjective in nature. These liabilities have been reflected based upon the most recent information available and principally include certain potential income tax exposures. The ultimate settlement of such liabilities may be for amounts which are different from the amounts presently recorded. Settlements related to income tax exposures, if any, would be adjusted
9
through goodwill.
Note 4. Comprehensive Income
The Companys comprehensive income for the three months ended October 31, 2004 and 2003 is set forth in the following table:
|
|
Three Months Ended October 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||
Net income |
|
$ |
3,107,000 |
|
$ |
1,795,000 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Unrealized loss on currency hedging, net of tax |
|
(1,067,000 |
) |
(430,000 |
) |
||
Unrealized gain on interest rate cap, net of tax |
|
5,000 |
|
14,000 |
|
||
Foreign currency translation, net of tax |
|
3,099,000 |
|
1,326,000 |
|
||
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
5,144,000 |
|
$ |
2,705,000 |
|
Note 5. Financial Instruments
The Company accounts for derivative instruments and hedging activities in accordance with SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (SFAS 133), as amended. SFAS 133 requires the Company to recognize all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. Derivatives that are not designated as hedges must be adjusted to fair value through earnings. If the derivative is designated as a hedge, depending on the nature of the hedge, changes in the fair value of the derivative will either be offset against the change in the fair value of the hedged assets, liabilities or firm commitments through earnings or recognized in other comprehensive income until the hedged item is recognized in earnings. The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of a derivative that is designated as a hedge will be immediately recognized in earnings.
Carsen purchases and pays for a substantial portion of its products in United States dollars and sells its products in Canadian dollars, and is therefore exposed to fluctuations in the rates of exchange between the United States dollar and Canadian dollar. In order to hedge against the impact of such currency fluctuations on the purchases of inventories, Carsen enters into foreign currency forward contracts on firm purchases of such inventories in United States dollars. These foreign currency forward contracts have been designated as cash flow hedge instruments. Total commitments for such foreign currency forward contracts amounted to $23,876,000 (United States dollars) at October 31, 2004 and cover a portion of Carsens projected purchases of inventories through January 2006. Under the Canadian Revolving Credit Facility, such commitments may not exceed $35,000,000 in an aggregate notional amount at any time.
In addition, changes in the value of the euro against the United States dollar affect the Companys results of operations because a portion of the net assets of Minntechs Netherlands subsidiary are denominated and ultimately settled in United States dollars but must be converted into its functional euro currency. In order to hedge against the impact of fluctuations in the value of the euro relative to the United States dollar, Minntech enters into short-term contracts to
10
purchase euros forward, which contracts are generally one month in duration. These short-term contracts have been designated as fair value hedge instruments. There was one such foreign currency forward contract amounting to 4,171,000 at October 31, 2004 which covers certain assets and liabilities of Minntechs Netherlands subsidiary which are denominated in United States dollars. Such contract expired on November 29, 2004. Under its credit facilities, such contracts to purchase euros may not exceed $12,000,000 in an aggregate notional amount at any time.
In accordance with SFAS 133, all of the Companys foreign currency forward contracts are designated as hedges. Recognition of gains and losses related to the foreign currency forward contracts is deferred within other comprehensive income until settlement of the underlying commitments, and realized gains and losses are recorded within cost of sales upon settlement. Gains and losses related to the hedging contracts to buy euros forward are immediately realized within general and administrative expenses due to the short-term nature of such contracts. The Company does not hold any derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes.
The Company entered into credit facilities in September 2001, as more fully described in note 8 to the condensed consolidated financial statements, for which the interest rate on outstanding borrowings is variable. In order to protect its interest rate exposure, the Company had entered into a three year interest rate cap agreement that expired on September 7, 2004 which capped the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) at 4.50% on $12,500,000 of the Companys borrowings. This interest rate cap agreement had been designated as a cash flow hedge instrument. The cost of the interest rate cap, which was included in other assets, was $246,500 and was amortized to interest expense over the three year life of the agreement.
Note 6. Intangibles and Goodwill
The Companys intangible assets which continue to be subject to amortization consist primarily of technology, customer relationships, non-compete agreements and patents. These intangible assets are being amortized on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets ranging from 3-20 years and have a weighted average amortization period of 10 years as of October 31, 2004. Amortization expense related to intangible assets was $431,000 and $354,000 for the three months ended October 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The Companys intangible assets that have indefinite useful lives and therefore are not amortized consist of trademarks and tradenames.
11
The Companys intangible assets consist of the following:
|
|
October 31, 2004 |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Gross |
|
Amortization |
|
Net |
|
|||||||
Intangible assets with finite lives: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Technology |
|
$ |
8,149,000 |
|
$ |
(1,465,000 |
) |
$ |
6,684,000 |
|
||||
Customer relationships |
|
5,302,000 |
|
(1,621,000 |
) |
3,681,000 |
|
|||||||
Non-compete agreements |
|
169,000 |
|
(70,000 |
) |
99,000 |
|
|||||||
Patents and other registrations |
|
228,000 |
|
(17,000 |
) |
211,000 |
|
|||||||
|
|
13,848,000 |
|
(3,173,000 |
) |
10,675,000 |
|
|||||||
Trademarks and tradenames |
|
3,470,000 |
|
|
|
3,470,000 |
|
|||||||
Total intangible assets |
|
$ |
17,318,000 |
|
$ |
(3,173,000 |
) |
$ |
14,145,000 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
July 31, 2004 |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Gross |
|
Amortization |
|
Net |
|
|||||||
Intangible assets with finite lives: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Technology |
|
$ |
7,901,000 |
|
$ |
(1,297,000 |
) |
$ |
6,604,000 |
|
||||
Customer relationships |
|
5,114,000 |
|
(1,410,000 |
) |
3,704,000 |
|
|||||||
Non-compete agreements |
|
169,000 |
|
(56,000 |
) |
113,000 |
|
|||||||
Patents and other registrations |
|
155,000 |
|
(13,000 |
) |
142,000 |
|
|||||||
|
|
13,339,000 |
|
(2,776,000 |
) |
10,563,000 |
|
|||||||
Trademarks and tradenames |
|
3,334,000 |
|
|
|
3,334,000 |
|
|||||||
Total intangible assets |
|
$ |
16,673,000 |
|
$ |
(2,776,000 |
) |
$ |
13,897,000 |
|
||||
Estimated amortization expense of the Companys intangible assets for the remainder of fiscal 2005 and the next four years is as follows:
Nine month period ending July 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
1,210,000 |
|
Fiscal 2006 |
|
1,621,000 |
|
|
Fiscal 2007 |
|
1,564,000 |
|
|
Fiscal 2008 |
|
1,378,000 |
|
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
1,057,000 |
|
During the three months ended October 31, 2004, goodwill increased as follows:
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
Currency |
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
July 31, 2004 |
|
Translation |
|
October 31, 2004 |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Dialysis |
|
$ |
8,958,000 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
8,958,000 |
|
||
Endoscopy and Surgical |
|
207,000 |
|
18,000 |
|
225,000 |
|
|||||
Endoscope Reprocessing |
|
6,245,000 |
|
102,000 |
|
6,347,000 |
|
|||||
Water Treatment |
|
9,907,000 |
|
426,000 |
|
10,333,000 |
|
|||||
Filtration and Separation |
|
2,575,000 |
|
|
|
2,575,000 |
|
|||||
All Other |
|
5,438,000 |
|
497,000 |
|
5,935,000 |
|
|||||
Total |
|
$ |
33,330,000 |
|
$ |
1,043,000 |
|
$ |
34,373,000 |
|
||
On July 31, 2004 and 2003, management performed impairment studies of the Companys goodwill and trademark and tradenames and concluded that such assets were not impaired.
12
Note 7. Warranty
A summary of activity in the warranty reserves follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended October 31, |
|
|||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
658,000 |
|
$ |
353,000 |
|
|
Provisions |
|
240,000 |
|
293,000 |
|
|||
Charges |
|
(207,000 |
) |
(304,000 |
) |
|||
Foreign currency translation |
|
5,000 |
|
1,000 |
|
|||
Acquisitions |
|
|
|
53,000 |
|
|||
Ending balance |
|
$ |
696,000 |
|
$ |
396,000 |
|
|
The warranty provisions and charges during the three months ended October 31, 2004 and 2003 relate principally to the Companys endoscope reprocessing products.
Note 8. Financing Arrangements
The Companys credit facilities include (i) a $25,000,000 senior secured amortizing term loan facility from a consortium of U.S. lenders (the Term Loan Facility), (ii) a $17,500,000 senior secured revolving credit facility from the U.S. lenders (the U.S. Revolving Credit Facility) available for future working capital requirements for the U.S. businesses of Cantel, including Minntech (Cantel and Minntech are collectively referred to as the U.S. Borrowers)(the Term Loan Facility and the U.S. Revolving Credit Facility are collectively referred to as the U.S. Credit Facilities), and (iii) a $6,000,000 (United States dollars) senior secured revolving credit facility for Carsen (the Canadian Borrower) with a Canadian bank (the Canadian Revolving Credit Facility) available for Carsens future working capital requirements (the U.S. Credit Facilities and the Canadian Revolving Credit Facility are collectively referred to as the Credit Facilities).
In conjunction with the acquisitions of Biolab and Mar Cor on August 1, 2003, the Company amended its Credit Facilities as follows: i) outstanding borrowings under the Term Loan Facility were reset to $25,000,000 to finance a portion of the Mar Cor acquisition, (ii) Mar Cor was added as a guarantor under the U.S. Credit Facilities and the stock and assets of Mar Cor were pledged as security for such guaranty, (iii) the Canadian Revolving Credit Facility was increased from $5,000,000 to $7,000,000 (which was subsequently decreased to $6,000,000 on August 1, 2004), (iv) Biolab was added as a guarantor under the Canadian Revolving Credit Facility and the stock and assets of Biolab were pledged as security for such guaranty, (v) the maturity dates of the U.S. Credit Facilities were extended to August 1, 2008, (vi) certain financial covenants of the Credit Facilities were modified to reflect the effect of the acquisitions in the Companys anticipated future operating results and (vii) the Company was permitted to guarantee the lease on Mar Cors facility. The maturity date of the Canadian Revolving Credit Facility remains September 7, 2006.
13
In conjunction with the acquisition of Saf-T-Pak on June 1, 2004, the Company amended its U.S. Revolving Credit Facility to permit the use of borrowings under the U.S. Revolving Credit Facility to finance the cash consideration and costs associated with the acquisition.
Borrowings under the Credit Facilities bear interest at rates ranging from .75% to 2.00% above the lenders base rate, or at rates ranging from 2.00% to 3.25% above LIBOR, depending upon the Companys consolidated ratio of debt to EBITDA. The base rates associated with the U.S. lenders and the Canadian lender were 4.75% and 4.25%, respectively, at October 31, 2004, and the LIBOR rates ranged from 1.50% to 2.37% at October 31, 2004. The margins applicable to the Companys outstanding borrowings at October 31, 2004 are 1.25% above the lenders base rate and 2.50% above LIBOR. At October 31, 2004, all of the Companys outstanding borrowings were under LIBOR contracts. In order to protect its interest rate exposure, the Company had entered into a three year interest rate cap agreement that expired on September 7, 2004 covering $12,500,000 of borrowings under the Term Loan Facility, which capped LIBOR on this portion of outstanding borrowings at 4.50%. The Credit Facilities also provide for fees on the unused portion of such facilities at rates ranging from .30% to .50%, depending upon the Companys consolidated ratio of debt to EBITDA.
The U.S. Credit Facilities provide for available borrowings based upon percentages of the eligible accounts receivable and inventories of Cantel, Minntech and Mar Cor; require the U.S. Borrowers to meet certain financial covenants; are secured by substantially all assets of the U.S. Borrowers and Mar Cor (including a pledge of the stock of Minntech and Mar Cor owned by Cantel and 65% of the outstanding shares of Carsen stock and Saf-T-Pak stock owned by Cantel); and are guaranteed by Minntech and Mar Cor. As of October 31, 2004, the Company was in compliance with the financial covenants under the U.S. Credit Facilities.
The Canadian Revolving Credit Facility provides for available borrowings based upon percentages of the eligible accounts receivable and inventories of Carsen and Biolab; requires the Canadian Borrower to meet certain financial covenants; and is secured by substantially all assets of the Canadian Borrower and Biolab. As of October 31, 2004, Carsen was in compliance with the financial covenants under the Canadian Revolving Credit Facility.
At October 31, 2004, the Company had $21,250,000 outstanding under the Term Loan Facility and had no outstanding borrowings under either the U.S. Revolving Credit Facility or the Canadian Revolving Credit Facility. Amounts repaid by the Company under the Term Loan Facility may not be re-borrowed.
Aggregate annual required maturities of the Term Loan Facility are as follows:
Nine month period ending July 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
2,250,000 |
|
Fiscal 2006 |
|
5,000,000 |
|
|
Fiscal 2007 |
|
6,000,000 |
|
|
Fiscal 2008 |
|
8,000,000 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
21,250,000 |
|
14
Note 9. Earnings Per Common Share
Basic earnings per common share are computed based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period.
Diluted earnings per common share are computed based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period plus the dilutive effect of common stock equivalents using the treasury stock method and the average market price for the period.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share:
|
|
Three Months Ended October 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||
Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net income |
|
$ |
3,107,000 |
|
$ |
1,795,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Denominator for basic and diluted earnings per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Denominator for basic earnings per common share - weighted average number of shares outstanding |
|
9,753,545 |
|
9,314,155 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Dilutive effect of common stock equivalents using the treasury stock method and the average market price for the period |
|
835,727 |
|
574,858 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Denominator for diluted earnings per common share - weighted average number of shares outstanding and common stock equivalents |
|
10,589,272 |
|
9,889,013 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Basic earnings per common share: |
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Diluted earnings per common share: |
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
Note 10. Income Taxes
The consolidated effective tax rate on income before income taxes was 38.1% and 36.2% for the three months ended October 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The Company has provided income tax expense for its United States operations at the statutory tax rate; however, actual payment of U.S. Federal income taxes reflects the benefits of the utilization of the Federal net operating loss carryforwards accumulated in the United States.
The Companys results of operations for the three months ended October 31, 2004 and 2003 also reflect income tax expense for its international subsidiaries at their respective statutory rates. Such international subsidiaries include the Companys subsidiaries in Canada and Japan, which had effective tax rates during the three months ended October 31, 2004 of approximately 35.5% and 45.0%, respectively. The
15
higher overall effective tax rate for the three months ended October 31, 2004, as compared with the three months ended October 31, 2003, is principally due to the geographic mix of pretax income and the loss from operations at the Companys Netherlands subsidiary for which no tax benefit was recorded.
Note 11. Operating Segments
In accordance with SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information (SFAS 131), the Company has determined its reportable business segments based upon an assessment of product types, organizational structure, customers and internally prepared financial statements. The primary factors used by management in analyzing segment performance are net sales and operating income. During fiscal 2004, the Company changed its internal reporting processes to include Product Service with the corresponding product segments to reflect the way the Company, through its executive management, manages, allocates resources and measures the performance of its businesses. Previously, Product Service was reported as a separate operating segment. All prior period segment results have been restated to reflect this change.
The Companys segments are as follows:
Dialysis, which includes disinfection/sterilization reprocessing equipment, sterilants, supplies, concentrates and electronic equipment related to hemodialysis treatment of patients with acute kidney failure or chronic kidney failure associated with end-stage renal disease.
Endoscopy and Surgical, which includes diagnostic and therapeutic medical equipment such as flexible and rigid endoscopes, surgical equipment and related accessories that are sold to hospitals. Additionally, this segment includes technical maintenance service on its products.
Endoscope Reprocessing, which includes endoscope disinfection equipment, disinfectants and related accessories and supplies that are sold to hospitals, clinics and physicians. Additionally, this segment includes technical maintenance service on its products.
Water Treatment, which includes water treatment equipment design, project management, installation, maintenance, deionization and mixing systems for the medical, pharmaceutical, biotechnology, research, beverage and semiconductor industries.
Filtration and Separation, which includes hollow fiber filter devices and ancillary products for use in cardiosurgery as well as for high-purity fluid and gas filtration systems in the pharmaceutical, electronics, medical, and biotechnology industries.
16
All Other
The All Other segment is comprised of the Scientific operating segment and the Companys Specialty Packaging operating segment, which was added as a result of the Saf-T-Pak acquisition on June 1, 2004. In accordance with quantitative thresholds established by SFAS 131, the Company combined the Scientific operating segment and the Specialty Packaging operating segment into the All Other segment.
Scientific, which includes microscopes and high performance image analysis hardware and related accessories that are sold to educational institutions, hospitals and government and industrial laboratories, and industrial technology equipment such as borescopes, fiberscopes and video image scopes that are sold primarily to large industrial companies. Additionally, this segment includes technical maintenance service on its products.
Specialty Packaging, which include specialized packaging for the safe transport of infectious and biological specimens, and compliance training services ranging from software and internet sessions to group seminars and private on-site programs.
The operating segments follow the same accounting policies used for the Companys condensed consolidated financial statements as described in note 2 to the 2004 Form 10-K.
Operating segment information is summarized below:
|
|
Three Months Ended October 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||
Net sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Dialysis |
|
$ |
16,752,000 |
|
$ |
14,772,000 |
|
Endoscopy and Surgical |
|
7,220,000 |
|
6,909,000 |
|
||
Endoscope Reprocessing |
|
6,724,000 |
|
5,328,000 |
|
||
Water Treatment |
|
4,444,000 |
|
4,540,000 |
|
||
Filtration and Separation |
|
3,793,000 |
|
3,519,000 |
|
||
All Other |
|
6,409,000 |
|
1,781,000 |
|
||
Total |
|
$ |
45,342,000 |
|
$ |
36,849,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Operating income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Dialysis |
|
$ |
2,272,000 |
|
$ |
1,458,000 |
|
Endoscopy and Surgical |
|
1,631,000 |
|
1,407,000 |
|
||
Endoscope Reprocessing |
|
1,138,000 |
|
570,000 |
|
||
Water Treatment |
|
(269,000 |
) |
97,000 |
|
||
Filtration and Separation |
|
1,060,000 |
|
683,000 |
|
||
All Other |
|
726,000 |
|
(55,000 |
) |
||
|
|
6,558,000 |
|
4,160,000 |
|
||
General corporate expenses |
|
(1,185,000 |
) |
(931,000 |
) |
||
Interest expense, net |
|
(351,000 |
) |
(415,000 |
) |
||
Income before income taxes |
|
$ |
5,022,000 |
|
$ |
2,814,000 |
|
17
Note 12. Legal Proceedings
In the normal course of business, the Company is subject to pending and threatened legal actions. It is the Companys policy to accrue for amounts related to these legal matters if it is probable that a liability has been incurred and an amount of anticipated exposure can be reasonably estimated.
In November 2003, HDC Medical Inc., a Kentucky corporation, filed a complaint against Minntech in the United States District Court, Western District of Kentucky (Case No. 3:03W-694-S). A motion was granted to the Company to transfer the case to the U.S. District Court in Minnesota. The plaintiff alleges that Minntech has violated federal antitrust laws, including the Sherman Act and the Clayton Act. In addition to requesting an injunction enjoining Minntech from continuing in alleged unlawful conduct, the plaintiff seeks an unspecified amount of actual damages, punitive damages, additional and/or treble statutory damages, and costs of suit. The Company believes that the allegations made in the complaint are without merit and it intends to vigorously defend the action. The case is expected to be ready for trial on or about July 1, 2005.
18
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
The results of operations reflect the results of Cantel and its wholly-owned subsidiaries.
Reference is made to (i) the impact on the Companys results of operations of a stronger Canadian dollar against the United States dollar during the three months ended October 31, 2004, compared with the three months ended October 31, 2003 (increase in value of approximately 6.5% for the three months ended October 31, 2004 as compared with the three months ended October 31, 2003, based upon average exchange rates reported by banking institutions), (ii) the impact on the Companys results of operations of a stronger euro against the United States dollar during the three months ended October 31, 2004, compared with the three months ended October 31, 2003 (increase in value of approximately 8.4% for the three months ended October 31, 2004, compared with the three months ended October 31, 2003, based upon average exchange rates reported by banking institutions), (iii) critical accounting policies of the Company, as more fully described elsewhere in this Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, (iv) the Companys acquisition of Saf-T-Pak on June 1, 2004, as more fully described in notes 3 and 8 to the condensed consolidated financial statements, and (v) the change in the Companys segment reporting, as more fully described elsewhere in this Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Since the Saf-T-Pak acquisition occurred on June 1, 2004, Saf-T-Pak is reflected in the Companys results of operations for the three months ended October 31, 2004, and is not reflected in the Companys results of operations for the three months ended October 31, 2003. The acquisition of Saf-T-Pak has added the Specialty Packaging operating segment to the Company, which is included in the All Other reportable segment.
Discussion herein of the Companys pre-existing business refers to the operations of Cantel, Carsen, Minntech, Biolab, and Mar Cor, but excludes the impact of the Saf-T-Pak acquisition. The ensuing discussion should also be read in conjunction with the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2004 (the 2004 Form 10-K).
19
The following table gives information as to the net sales and the percentage to the total net sales by each reportable segment of the Company:
|
|
Three Months Ended October 31, |
|
||||||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||||||
|
|
(Dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
||||||||
|
|
$ |
|
% |
|
$ |
|
% |
|
||
Dialysis |
|
$ |
16,752 |
|
37.0 |
|
$ |
14,772 |
|
40.1 |
|
Endoscopy and Surgical |
|
7,220 |
|
15.9 |
|
6,909 |
|
18.8 |
|
||
Endoscope Reprocessing |
|
6,724 |
|
14.8 |
|
5,328 |
|
14.5 |
|
||
Water Treatment |
|
4,444 |
|
9.8 |
|
4,540 |
|
12.3 |
|
||
Filtration and Separation |
|
3,793 |
|
8.4 |
|
3,519 |
|
9.5 |
|
||
All Other |
|
6,409 |
|
14.1 |
|
1,781 |
|
4.8 |
|
||
|
|
$ |
45,342 |
|
100.0 |
|
$ |
36,849 |
|
100.0 |
|
During fiscal 2004, the Company changed its internal reporting processes to include Product Service within the corresponding product segments to reflect the way the Company, through its executive management, manages, allocates resources and measures the performance of its businesses. Previously, Product Service was reported as a separate operating segment. All prior period segment results have been restated to reflect this change.
The All Other segment is comprised of the Scientific operating segment and the Companys new operating segment, Specialty Packaging, which was added as a result of the Saf-T-Pak acquisition on June 1, 2004.
Net sales increased by $8,493,000, or 23.0%, to $45,342,000 for the three months ended October 31, 2004, from $36,849,000 for the three months ended October 31, 2003. Net sales contributed by Saf-T-Pak for the three months ended October 31, 2004 were $1,225,000. Net sales of the Companys pre-existing business increased by $7,268,000, or 19.7%, to $44,117,000 for the three months ended October 31, 2004, compared with the three months ended October 31, 2003.
Net sales were positively impacted for the three months ended October 31, 2004, compared with the three months ended October 31, 2003, by approximately $865,000 due to the translation of Carsens and Biolabs net sales using a stronger Canadian dollar against the United States dollar. Carsens net sales are principally included in the Endoscopy and Surgical and Scientific segments. Biolabs net sales are included in the Water Treatment segment.
In addition, net sales were positively impacted for the three months ended October 31, 2004, compared with the three months ended October 31, 2003, by approximately $217,000 due to the translation of Minntechs Netherlands subsidiary net sales using a stronger euro against the United States dollar. The majority of the net sales of Minntechs Netherlands subsidiary are included in the Dialysis segment.
Increases in selling prices of the Companys products did not have a significant effect on net sales for the three months ended October 31, 2004.
20
The increase in net sales of the Companys pre-existing business for the three months ended October 31, 2004 was principally attributable to increases in sales of dialysis products, endoscopy and surgical products, endoscope reprocessing products, filtration and separation products and scientific products.
Sales of dialysis products and services increased by 13.4% for the three months ended October 31, 2004, compared with the three months ended October 31, 2003, primarily due to an increase in sales volume of concentrate (a concentrated acid used to prepare dialysate, a chemical solution that draws waste products from a patients blood through a dialyzer membrane during hemodialysis treatment) to several major U.S. dialysis chains and to an international customer, and increases in demand for the Companys Renatron product (dialyzer reprocessing equipment), Renalin product (sterilant) and dialyzer reuse supplies. The increase in demand for the Companys Renalin product was offset by lower selling prices attributable to customer mix.
The increase in sales of endoscopy and surgical products and services was primarily due to improved healthcare funding in Canada and the translation of Carsens net sales using a stronger Canadian dollar against the United States dollar. The increase during the three months ended October 31, 2004 is being compared to the three months ended October 31, 2003, which prior year period included strong sales volume as a result of the decrease in cases of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in the greater Toronto area which allowed the Companys sales personnel to once again begin visiting hospitals. Net sales of endoscopy and surgical products and services increased by 4.5% in U.S. dollars, and decreased by 1.8% in their functional Canadian currency, during the three months ended October 31, 2004, compared with the three months ended October 31, 2003. Healthcare funding in Canada is dependent upon governmental appropriations. During the past year, Canada adopted a budget that provides for a significant increase in funding for healthcare. However, the Company cannot ascertain what impact the funding situation or Canadas budget will have on future sales of endoscopy and surgical products.
The increase in sales of endoscope reprocessing products and service of 26.2% for the three months ended October 31, 2004, compared with the three months ended October 31, 2003, was primarily due to an increase in sales volume for endoscope disinfection equipment, disinfectants (including the Companys new Adaspor product in Europe) and related consumables both in the United States and internationally, and an increase in product service due to the increased field population of equipment.
The increase in sales of filtration and separation products of 7.8% for the three months ended October 31, 2004, compared with the three months ended October 31, 2003, was primarily due to an increase in demand for the Companys hemofilter product (a device used for slow, continuous blood filtration therapy used to control fluid overload and acute renal failure in unstable, critically ill patients that cannot tolerate the rapid filtration rates of conventional hemodialysis) and water and air filter products, and international sales of the Companys new dry fog system.
21
Sales in the All Other reportable segment were $6,409,000, an increase of $4,628,000, or 259.9% for the three months ended October 31, 2004, as compared with the three months ended October 31, 2003. Net sales contributed by the Specialty Packaging operating segment for the three months ended October 31, 2004 were $1,225,000. Net sales contributed by the Scientific operating segment were $5,184,000, an increase of $3,403,000, or 191.1% for the three months ended October 31, 2004, compared with the three months ended October 31, 2003. The increase in sales of scientific products was primarily due to a large sale of microscopes and related imaging products to a Canadian University, the introduction of a new confocal microscope and increased demand for scientific and industrial microscopes and related imaging products in Canada.
Gross profit increased by $4,042,000, or 30.7%, to $17,215,000 for the three months ended October 31, 2004, from $13,173,000 for the three months ended October 31, 2003. Gross profit contributed by Saf-T-Pak for the three months ended October 31, 2004 was $725,000. Gross profit of the Companys pre-existing business increased by $3,317,000, or 25.2%, to $16,490,000 for the three months ended October 31, 2004, compared with the three months ended October 31, 2003.
Gross profit as a percentage of net sales for the three months ended October 31, 2004 and 2003 was 38.0% and 35.7%, respectively. Gross profit as a percentage of net sales for Saf-T-Pak for the three months ended October 31, 2004 was 59.2%. Gross profit as a percentage of net sales of the Companys pre-existing business for the three months ended October 31, 2004 was 37.4%.
The higher gross profit percentage from the Companys pre-existing business for the three months ended October 31, 2004, compared with the three months ended October 31, 2003, was primarily attributable to favorable sales mix in all of the Companys pre-existing operating segments (except Scientific), favorable Canadian dollar exchange rates and improved overhead absorption in the Companys dialysis, endoscope reprocessing and filtration and separation businesses due to increases in sales volume.
The favorable Canadian dollar exchange rates lowered Carsens cost of inventory purchased, and therefore decreased cost of sales and increased gross profit, by approximately $542,000 for the three months ended October 31, 2004, compared with the three months ended October 31, 2003. In addition, gross profit was positively impacted for the three months ended October 31, 2004, compared with the three months ended October 31, 2003, by approximately $287,000 due to the translation of Carsens and Biolabs gross profit using a stronger Canadian dollar against the United States dollar (which also impacts net sales and therefore has no impact on gross profit as a percentage of net sales). Similarly, gross profit was positively impacted for the three months ended October 31, 2004, compared with the three months ended October 31, 2003, by approximately $54,000 due to the translation of Minntechs Netherlands subsidiary gross profit using a stronger euro against the United States dollar.
Selling expenses increased by $708,000 to $5,408,000 for the three months ended October 31, 2004, from $4,700,000 for the three months
22
ended October 31, 2003, principally due to the inclusion of Saf-T-Pak; an increase in incentive compensation; the translation of Carsens and Biolabs expenses using a stronger Canadian dollar against the United States dollar; and the addition of sales representatives and management personnel in the Endoscopy and Surgical segment.
Selling expenses as a percentage of net sales were 11.9% for the three months ended October 31, 2004, compared with 12.8% for the three months ended October 31, 2003. The decrease in selling expenses as a percentage of net sales was primarily attributable to the favorable impact of increased net sales against the fixed component of selling expenses, partially offset by the addition of sales representatives and management personnel in the Endoscopy and Surgical segment and an increase in incentive compensation.
General and administrative expenses increased by $1,276,000 to $5,450,000 for the three months ended October 31, 2004, from $4,174,000 for the three months ended October 31, 2003, principally due to the inclusion of Saf-T-Pak; an increase in incentive compensation; increased accounting and consulting costs relating to corporate governance; increases in foreign exchange losses associated with translating certain foreign denominated assets into functional currencies; the translation of Carsens and Biolabs expenses using a stronger Canadian dollar against the United States dollar; and additional executive personnel.
Research and development expenses (which include continuing engineering costs) decreased by $86,000 to $984,000 for the three months ended October 31, 2004, from $1,070,000 for the three months ended October 31, 2003. The majority of research and development expenses for the three months ended October 31, 2004 and 2003 related to the Dyped endoscope reprocessor.
Interest expense decreased by $23,000 to $429,000 for the three months ended October 31, 2004, from $452,000 for the three months ended October 31, 2003, primarily due to the decrease in average outstanding borrowings, partially offset by an increase in average interest rates. Interest income increased by $55,000 to $78,000 for the three months ended October 31, 2004, from $23,000 for the three months ended October 31, 2003, due to an increase in the average cash balance.
Income before income taxes increased by $2,208,000 to $5,022,000 for the three months ended October 31, 2004, from $2,814,000 for the three months ended October 31, 2003.
The consolidated effective tax rate on income before income taxes was 38.1% and 36.2% for the three months ended October 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The Company has provided income tax expense for its United States operations at the statutory tax rate; however, actual payment of U.S. Federal income taxes reflects the benefits of the utilization of the Federal net operating loss carryforwards (NOLs) accumulated in the United States.
The Companys results of operations for the three months ended October 31, 2004 and 2003 also reflect income tax expense for its international subsidiaries at their respective statutory rates. Such international subsidiaries include the Companys subsidiaries in Canada
23
and Japan, which had effective tax rates during the three months ended October 31, 2004 of approximately 35.5% and 45.0%, respectively. The higher overall effective tax rate for the three months ended October 31, 2004, as compared with the three months ended October 31, 2003, is principally due to the geographic mix of pretax income and the loss from operations at the Companys Netherlands subsidiary for which no tax benefit was recorded.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At October 31, 2004, the Companys working capital was $49,002,000, compared with $46,735,000 at July 31, 2004. This increase in working capital was due to the increase in cash, as described below, as well as the translation of net assets of the Companys Canadian subsidiaries using a stronger Canadian dollar against the United States dollar.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $4,354,000 and $1,805,000 for the three months ended October 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. For the three months ended October 31, 2004, the net cash provided by operating activities was primarily due to net income, after adjusting for depreciation and amortization, deferred income taxes, and a decrease in accounts receivable due to the timing of cash collections, partially offset by a decrease in income taxes payable due to timing of Canadian tax payments. For the three months ended October 31, 2003, the net cash provided by operating activities was primarily due to net income, after adjusting for depreciation and amortization, and a decrease in accounts receivable, partially offset by a decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses.
Net cash used in investing activities was $702,000 and $17,174,000 for the three months ended October 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. For the three months ended October 31, 2004, the net cash used in investing activities was primarily due to capital expenditures. For the three months ended October 31, 2003, the net cash used in investing activities was primarily due to the acquisitions of Biolab, Mar Cor and Dyped.
Net cash used in financing activities was $3,352,000 for the three months ended October 31, 2004, compared with net cash provided by financing activities of $8,374,000 for the three months ended October 31, 2003. For the three months ended October 31, 2004, the net cash used in financing activities was primarily attributable to repayments under the Companys credit facilities. For the three months ended October 31, 2003, the net cash provided by financing activities was primarily attributable to borrowings under the Companys credit facilities related to the acquisition of Mar Cor.
Net cash was positively impacted by $1,012,000 for the three months ended October 31, 2004, compared with $472,000 for the three months ended October 31, 2003, due to the translation of the assets and liabilities of the Companys foreign subsidiaries using stronger functional currencies against the United States dollar.
The Companys credit facilities include (i) a $25,000,000 senior secured amortizing term loan facility from a consortium of U.S. lenders (the Term Loan Facility), (ii) a $17,500,000 senior secured revolving credit facility from the U.S. lenders (the U.S. Revolving Credit Facility) available for future working capital requirements for the U.S. businesses of Cantel, including Minntech (Cantel and Minntech are
24
collectively referred to as the U.S. Borrowers) (the Term Loan Facility and the U.S. Revolving Credit Facility are collectively referred to as the U.S. Credit Facilities), and (iii) a $6,000,000 (United States dollars) senior secured revolving credit facility for Carsen (the Canadian Borrower) with a Canadian bank (the Canadian Revolving Credit Facility) available for Carsens future working capital requirements (the U.S. Credit Facilities and the Canadian Revolving Credit Facility are collectively referred to as the Credit Facilities).
In conjunction with the acquisitions of Biolab and Mar Cor on August 1, 2003, the Company amended its Credit Facilities as follows: i) outstanding borrowings under the Term Loan Facility were reset to $25,000,000 to finance a portion of the Mar Cor acquisition, (ii) Mar Cor was added as a guarantor under the U.S. Credit Facilities and the stock and assets of Mar Cor were pledged as security for such guaranty, (iii) the Canadian Revolving Credit Facility was increased from $5,000,000 to $7,000,000 (which was subsequently decreased to $6,000,000 on August 1, 2004), (iv) Biolab was added as a guarantor under the Canadian Revolving Credit Facility and the stock and assets of Biolab were pledged as security for such guaranty, (v) the maturity dates of the U.S. Credit Facilities were extended to August 1, 2008, (vi) certain financial covenants of the Credit Facilities were modified to reflect the effect of the acquisitions in the Companys anticipated future operating results and (vii) the Company was permitted to guarantee the lease on Mar Cors facility. The maturity date of the Canadian Revolving Credit Facility remains September 7, 2006.
In conjunction with the acquisition of Saf-T-Pak on June 1, 2004, the Company amended its U.S. Revolving Credit Facility to permit the use of borrowings under the U.S. Revolving Credit Facility to finance the cash consideration and costs associated with the acquisition.
Borrowings under the Credit Facilities bear interest at rates ranging from .75% to 2.00% above the lenders base rate, or at rates ranging from 2.00% to 3.25% above LIBOR, depending upon the Companys consolidated ratio of debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA). The base rates associated with the U.S. lenders and the Canadian lender were 5.00% and 4.25%, respectively, at November 30, 2004, and the LIBOR rates ranged from 1.50% to 2.37% at November 30, 2004. The margins applicable to the Companys outstanding borrowings at November 30, 2004 are 1.25% above the lenders base rate and 2.50% above LIBOR. At November 30, 2004, all of the Companys outstanding borrowings were under LIBOR contracts. In order to protect its interest rate exposure, the Company had entered into a three-year interest rate cap agreement that expired on September 7, 2004 covering $12,500,000 of borrowings under the Term Loan Facility, which capped LIBOR on this portion of outstanding borrowings at 4.50%. The Credit Facilities also provide for fees on the unused portion of such facilities at rates ranging from .30% to .50%, depending upon the Companys consolidated ratio of debt to EBITDA.
The U.S. Credit Facilities provide for available borrowings based upon percentages of the eligible accounts receivable and inventories of Cantel, Minntech and Mar Cor; require the U.S. Borrowers to meet certain financial covenants; are secured by substantially all assets of the U.S. Borrowers and Mar Cor (including a pledge of the stock of Minntech and Mar Cor owned by Cantel and 65% of the outstanding shares
25
of Carsen stock and Saf-T-Pak stock owned by Cantel); and are guaranteed by Minntech and Mar Cor. As of October 31, 2004, the Company was in compliance with the financial covenants under the U.S. Credit Facilities.
The Canadian Revolving Credit Facility provides for available borrowings based upon percentages of the eligible accounts receivable and inventories of Carsen and Biolab; requires the Canadian Borrower to meet certain financial covenants; and is secured by substantially all assets of the Canadian Borrower and Biolab. As of October 31, 2004, Carsen was in compliance with the financial covenants under the Canadian Revolving Credit Facility.
At October 31, 2003, the Company had $21,250,000 outstanding under the Term Loan Facility and had no outstanding borrowings under either the U.S. Revolving Credit Facility or the Canadian Revolving Credit Facility. Amounts repaid by the Company under the Term Loan Facility may not be re-borrowed.
Aggregate annual required maturities of the Term Loan Facility are as follows:
Nine month period ending July 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
2,250,000 |
|
Fiscal 2006 |
|
5,000,000 |
|
|
Fiscal 2007 |
|
6,000,000 |
|
|
Fiscal 2008 |
|
8,000,000 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
21,250,000 |
|
In conjunction with the Dyped acquisition on September 12, 2003, the Company issued a note with a face value of 1,350,000 ($1,505,000 using the exchange rate on the date of the acquisition). At October 31, 2004, approximately $1,560,000 of this note was outstanding using the exchange rate on October 31, 2004. Such note is non-interest bearing and has been recorded at its present value of $1,334,000 at October 31, 2004. The current portion of this note is recorded in accrued expenses and the remainder is recorded in other long-term liabilities.
Also included in other long-term liabilities are deferred compensation arrangements for certain former Minntech directors and officers.
Aggregate future minimum commitments at October 31, 2004 under noncancelable operating leases for property and equipment are as follows:
Nine month period ending July 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
1,434,000 |
|
Fiscal 2006 |
|
886,000 |
|
|
Fiscal 2007 |
|
489,000 |
|
|
Fiscal 2008 |
|
241,000 |
|
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
193,000 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
1,442,000 |
|
|
Total lease commitments |
|
$ |
4,685,000 |
|
The majority of Carsens sales of endoscopy and surgical products and scientific products related to microscopy have been made pursuant to a distribution agreement (the Olympus Agreement) with Olympus America Inc. (Olympus), and the majority of Carsens sales of
26
scientific products related to industrial technology equipment have been made pursuant to a distribution agreement with Olympus Industrial America Inc. (the Olympus Industrial Agreement), under which Carsen has been granted the exclusive right to distribute the covered Olympus products in Canada. Under the Olympus Agreement, Carsen is subject to minimum purchase requirements of $20,600,000 and $23,500,000 for the contract years ending March 31, 2005 and 2006, respectively. There are no minimum purchase requirements under the Olympus Industrial Agreement. Both agreements expire on March 31, 2006.
Effective August 1, 2003, Minntech renewed its distribution agreement with Olympus (the MediVators Agreement) which grants Olympus the exclusive right to distribute the majority of the Companys endoscope reprocessing products and related accessories and supplies in the United States and Puerto Rico. Failure by Olympus to achieve the minimum purchase projections in any contract year gives Minntech the option to terminate the MediVators Agreement. The MediVators Agreement expires on August 1, 2006. Despite the fact that Olympus historically has not achieved the minimum purchase projections, the Company has elected not to terminate or significantly restructure the MediVators Agreement because the Company believes that Olympus existing domestic distribution capabilities continue to provide the Company with the broadest distribution and profit potential for its endoscope reprocessing products.
The Company has determined that it will repatriate minimal amounts of existing and future accumulated profits from its international locations until existing domestic NOLs are exhausted, which the Company estimates to be no earlier than fiscal 2005. Notwithstanding this strategy, the Company believes that its current cash position, anticipated cash flows from operations, and the funds available under its revolving credit facilities will be sufficient to satisfy the Companys cash operating requirements for the foreseeable future based upon its existing operations. At November 30, 2004, approximately $21,820,000 was available under the revolving credit facilities, of which $15,820,000 was available for its United States operations.
During the three months ended October 31, 2004, compared with the three months ended October 31, 2003, the average value of the Canadian dollar increased by approximately 6.5% relative to the value of the United States dollar. Changes in the value of the Canadian dollar against the United States dollar affect the Companys results of operations because Carsen purchases substantially all of its products in United States dollars and sells its products in Canadian dollars. In addition, Biolab and Saf-T-Pak sell a significant amount of their products in United States dollars and therefore are exposed to foreign currency gains and losses upon the collection of such receivables. During the three months ended October 31, 2004, compared with the three months ended October 31, 2003, such strengthening of the Canadian dollar relative to the United States dollar had an overall positive impact upon the Companys results of operations. Such currency fluctuations also result in a corresponding change in the United States dollar value of the Companys assets that are denominated in Canadian dollars.
Under the Canadian Revolving Credit Facility, Carsen has a $35,000,000 (United States dollars) foreign currency hedging facility, as amended, which is available to hedge against the impact of such
27
currency fluctuations on purchases of inventories. Total commitments for foreign currency forward contracts under this facility amounted to $28,150,000 (United States dollars) at November 30, 2004 and cover a portion of the Canadian subsidiarys projected purchases of inventories through July 2006. These foreign currency forward contracts have been designated as cash flow hedge instruments. The weighted average exchange rate of the forward contracts open at November 30, 2004 was $1.3008 Canadian dollar per United States dollar, or $.7688 United States dollar per Canadian dollar. The exchange rate published by the Wall Street Journal on November 30, 2004 was $1.1860 Canadian dollar per United States dollar, or $.8432 United States dollar per Canadian dollar.
During the three months ended October 31, 2004, compared with the three months ended October 31, 2003, the value of the euro increased by approximately 8.4% relative to the value of the United States dollar. Changes in the value of the euro against the United States dollar affect the Companys results of operations because a portion of the net assets of Minntechs Netherlands subsidiary are denominated and ultimately settled in United States dollars but must be converted into its functional euro currency. During the three months ended October 31, 2004, such strengthening of the euro relative to the United States dollar had an overall adverse impact upon the Companys results of operations. Such currency fluctuations also result in a change in the United States dollar value of the Companys assets that are denominated in euros.
In order to hedge against the impact of fluctuations in the value of the euro relative to the United States dollar, the Company enters into short-term contracts to purchase euros forward, which contracts are generally one month in duration. These short-term contracts have been designated as fair value hedges. There was one foreign currency forward contract amounting to 3,391,000 at November 30, 2004 which covers certain assets and liabilities of Minntechs Netherlands subsidiary which are denominated in United States dollars. Such contract expires on December 31, 2004. Under its Credit Facilities, such contracts to purchase euros may not exceed $12,000,000 in an aggregate notional amount at any time. During the three months ended October 31, 2004, such forward contracts were effective in offsetting the adverse impact of the strengthening of the euro on the Companys results of operations.
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 133, as amended, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (SFAS 133), all of the Companys foreign currency forward contracts are designated as hedges. Recognition of gains and losses related to the Canadian hedges is deferred within other comprehensive income until settlement of the underlying commitments, and realized gains and losses are recorded within cost of sales upon settlement. Gains and losses related to the hedging contracts to buy euros forward are immediately realized within general and administrative expenses due to the short-term nature of such contracts.
For purposes of translating the balance sheet, at October 31, 2004 compared with July 31, 2004, the value of the Canadian dollar and the value of the euro increased by approximately 9.1% and 5.8%, respectively, compared to the value of the United States dollar. The total of these currency movements resulted in a foreign currency
28
translation gain of $3,099,000 for the three months ended October 31, 2004, thereby increasing stockholders equity.
Changes in the value of the Japanese yen relative to the United States dollar during the three months ended October 31, 2004 and 2003 did not have a significant impact upon either the Companys results of operations or the translation of the balance sheet, primarily due to the fact that the Companys Japanese subsidiary accounts for a relatively small portion of consolidated net sales, net income and net assets.
Inflation has not significantly impacted the Companys operations.
The Companys discussion and analysis of its financial condition and results of operations are based upon the Companys condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, the Company continually evaluates its estimates. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates.
The Company believes the following critical accounting policies affect its more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of its condensed consolidated financial statements.
Revenue on product sales (excluding certain sales of endoscope reprocessing equipment in the United States) is recognized as products are shipped to customers and title passes. The passing of title is determined based upon the FOB terms specified for each shipment. With respect to dialysis, filtration and separation, packaging and a portion of endoscope reprocessing products, shipment terms are generally FOB origin for common carrier and FOB destination when the Companys distribution fleet is utilized. With respect to endoscopy and surgical, water treatment and scientific products, shipment terms may be either FOB origin or destination. Customer acceptance for the majority of the Companys product sales occurs at the time of delivery. In certain instances, primarily with respect to some of the Companys water treatment products and an insignificant amount of the Companys sales of dialysis equipment and scientific products, post-delivery obligations such as installation, in-servicing or training are contractually specified; in such instances, revenue recognition is deferred until all of such conditions have been substantially fulfilled such that the products are deemed functional by the end-user. With respect to a portion of endoscopy and surgical, water treatment and scientific product sales, equipment is sold as part of a system for which the equipment is functionally interdependent or the customers purchase order specifies ship-complete as a condition of delivery;
29
revenue recognition on such sales is deferred until all equipment has been delivered.
With respect to a portion of endoscopy and surgical sales, the Company enters into arrangements whereby revenue is immediately recognized upon the transfer of equipment to customers who pay on a cost per procedure basis, subject to minimum monthly payments. Such arrangements are non-cancelable by the customer and provide for a bargain purchase option by the customer at the conclusion of the term. All direct costs related to these transactions are recorded at the time of revenue recognition. Some of such transactions also provide for future servicing of the equipment, which service revenue component is deferred and recognized over the period that such services are provided. With respect to these multiple element arrangements, revenue is allocated to the equipment and service components based upon vendor specific objective evidence which principally includes comparable historical transactions of similar equipment and service sold as stand-alone components.
Sales of a majority of the Companys endoscope reprocessing equipment to a third party distributor in the United States are recognized on a bill and hold basis. Such sales satisfy each of the following criteria: (i) the risks of ownership have passed to the third party distributor; (ii) the third party distributor must provide a written purchase order committing to the purchase of specified units; (iii) the bill and hold arrangement was specifically requested by the third party distributor for the purpose of minimizing the impact of multiple shipments of the units; (iv) the third party distributor provides specific instructions for shipment to customers, and completed units held by the Company for the third party distributor generally do not exceed three months of anticipated shipments; (v) the Company has no further performance obligations with respect to such units; (vi) completed units are invoiced to the third party distributor with 30 day payment terms and such receivables are generally satisfied within such terms; and (vii) completed units are ready for shipment and segregated in a designated section of the Companys warehouse reserved only for the third party distributor.
Revenue on service sales is recognized when repairs are completed at the customers location or when repairs are completed at the Companys facilities and the products are shipped to customers. All shipping and handling fees invoiced to customers, such as freight, are recorded as revenue (and related costs are included within cost of sales) at the time the sale is recognized.
None of the Companys sales, including the bill and hold sales arrangement, contain right-of-return provisions, and customer claims for credit or return due to damage, defect, shortage or other reason must be pre-approved by the Company before credit is issued or such product is accepted for return. No cash discounts for early payment are offered except with respect to a small portion of the Companys sales of dialysis products and certain prepaid packaging products. Price protection is not offered by the Company, although advance pricing contracts or required notice periods prior to implementation of price increases exist for certain customers with respect to many of the Companys products. With respect to certain of the Companys dialysis and endoscope reprocessing customers, volume rebates and trade-in allowances are provided; such volume rebates and trade-in
30
allowances are provided for as a reduction of sales at the time of revenue recognition and amounted to $191,000 and $97,000 for the three months ended October 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Such allowances are determined based on estimated projections of sales volume and trade-ins for the entire rebate agreement periods. The increase in rebates for the three months ended October 31, 2004, compared with the three months ended October 31, 2003, is primarily due to an increase in sales volume to several major U.S. dialysis chains and additional rebate agreements for the Companys Renalin 100 (sterilant) product. Trade-in allowances were not significant during the three months ended October 31, 2004. If it becomes known that sales volume to customers will deviate from original projections, the volume rebate provisions originally established would be adjusted accordingly.
The majority of the Companys dialysis products and services are sold to end-users; the majority of filtration and separation products and endoscope reprocessing products and services are sold to third party distributors; the majority of endoscopy and surgical products and services are sold directly to hospitals; the majority of water treatment products and services are sold to hospitals, dialysis clinics, pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies and other end-users; scientific products and services are sold to hospitals, laboratories and other end-users; and packaging products are sold to third-party distributors, medical research companies, laboratories, pharmaceutical companies, hospitals, government agencies and other end-users. Sales to all of these customers follow the Companys revenue recognition policies.
Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Accounts receivable consist of amounts due to the Company from normal business activities. Allowances for doubtful accounts are reserves for the estimated loss from the inability of customers to make required payments. The Company uses historical experience as well as current market information in determining the estimate. While actual losses have historically been within managements expectations and provisions established, if the financial condition of the Companys customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required.
Inventories consist of products which are sold in the ordinary course of the Companys business and are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market. In assessing the value of inventories, the Company must make estimates and judgments regarding reserves required for product obsolescence, aging of inventories and other issues potentially affecting the saleable condition of products. In performing such evaluations, the Company uses historical experience as well as current market information. In one such evaluation in fiscal 2003, the Company determined that certain parts relating to the Companys endoscope reprocessing equipment were obsolete, primarily due to design changes, resulting in an additional provision of approximately $300,000. With few exceptions, the saleable value of the Companys inventories has historically been within managements expectation and provisions established, however, rapid changes in the
31
market due to competition, technology and various other factors could have an adverse effect on the saleable value of the Companys inventories, resulting in the need for additional reserves.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Certain of the Companys identifiable intangible assets, including technology, customer relationships, patents and non-compete agreements, are amortized on the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives which range from 3 to 20 years. Additionally, the Company has recorded goodwill and trademarks and tradenames, all of which have indefinite useful lives and are therefore not amortized. All of the Companys intangible assets and goodwill are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable, and goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives are reviewed for impairment at least annually. The Companys management is primarily responsible for determining if impairment exists and considers a number of factors, including third-party valuations, when making these determinations. In performing a review for goodwill impairment, management uses a two-step process that begins with an estimation of the fair value of the related operating segments. The first step is a review for potential impairment, and the second step measures the amount of impairment, if any. In performing its annual review for indefinite lived intangibles, management compares the current fair value of such assets to their carrying values. With respect to amortizable intangible assets when impairment indicators are present, management would determine whether non-discounted cash flows would be sufficient to recover the carrying value of the assets; if not, the carrying value of the assets would be adjusted to their fair value. On July 31, 2004, management concluded that none of the Companys intangible assets or goodwill was impaired since the individual fair values exceeded their carrying values. While the results of these annual reviews have historically not indicated impairment, impairment reviews are highly dependent on managements projections of future operating results of the Company which management believes to be reasonable.
The Company provides for estimated costs that may be incurred to remedy deficiencies of quality or performance of the Companys products at the time of revenue recognition. Most of the Companys products have a one year warranty, although a majority of the Companys endoscope reprocessing equipment in the United States may carry a warranty period of up to fifteen months. The Company records provisions for product warranties as a component of cost of sales based upon an estimate of the amounts necessary to settle existing and future claims on products sold. The historical relationship of warranty costs to products sold is the primary basis for the estimate. A significant increase in third party service repair rates, the cost and availability of parts or the frequency of claims could have a material adverse impact on the Companys results for the period or periods in which such claims or additional costs materialize. Management reviews its warranty exposure periodically and believes that the warranty reserves are adequate; however, actual claims incurred could differ from original estimates, requiring adjustments to the reserves. In one such review
32
during fiscal 2003, the Companys results of operations were adversely impacted by an additional charge of approximately $570,000 related to endoscope reprocessing equipment due to a component failure which required warranty service to many endoscope reprocessing units in the field. Management believes this situation was fully remedied in fiscal 2003.
Income Taxes
The Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities based on differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax basis of assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities also include items recorded in conjunction with the purchase accounting for business acquisitions. The Company regularly reviews its deferred tax assets for recoverability and establishes a valuation allowance, if necessary, based on historical taxable income, projected future taxable income, and the expected timing of the reversals of existing temporary differences. Although realization is not assured, management believes it is more likely than not that the recorded deferred tax assets will be realized. Additionally, deferred tax liabilities are regularly reviewed to confirm that such amounts are appropriately stated. Such a review considers known future changes in various effective tax rates, principally in the United States. If the United States effective tax rate were to change in the future, the Companys items of deferred tax could be materially affected. All of such evaluations require significant management judgments.
It is the Companys policy to establish reserves for possible exposures as a result of an examination by tax authorities. The Company establishes the reserves based primarily upon managements assessment of exposure associated with acquired companies and permanent tax differences. The tax reserves are analyzed periodically (at least annually) and adjustments are made, as events occur to warrant adjustment to the reserves. The majority of the Companys income tax reserves originated from acquisitions; therefore, changes to such reserves, if any, would be adjusted through goodwill.
Acquisitions require significant estimates and judgments related to the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed.
Certain liabilities are subjective in nature. The Company reflects such liabilities based upon the most recent information available. In conjunction with the Companys acquisitions, such subjective liabilities principally include certain income tax and sales and use tax exposures, including tax liabilities related to the Companys foreign subsidiaries. The ultimate settlement of such liabilities may be for amounts which are different from the amounts recorded.
The Company does not have any off balance sheet financial arrangements.
33
Forward Looking Statements
This quarterly report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements that set forth anticipated results based on managements plans and assumptions. From time to time, the Company also provides forward-looking statements in other materials released to the public as well as oral forward-looking statements. These statements are based on current expectations, estimates, or forecasts about the industries in which the Company operates and the beliefs and assumptions of management; they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. The Company has tried, wherever possible, to identify such statements by using words such as expect, anticipate, goal, project, intend, plan, believe, seek, will, may, could, and variations of such words and similar expressions. In addition, any statements that refer to predictions or projections of the Companys future financial performance, anticipated growth and trends in the Companys businesses, and other characterizations of future events or circumstances are forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned that these forward-looking statements are only predictions about future events, activities or developments and are subject to numerous risks, uncertainties, and assumptions that are difficult to predict including, among other things, the following:
acceptance and demand of new products
the impact of competitive products and pricing
the Companys ability to successfully integrate and operate acquired and merged businesses and the risks associated with such businesses
the ability to keep pace with technological advances
the relationships with key suppliers and key customers
foreign currency and interest rate risks
changes in global or local economic conditions
changes in government regulation affecting the Companys businesses
Readers should understand that it is not possible to predict or identify all such factors. Consequently, readers should not consider the foregoing items to be a complete list of all potential risks or uncertainties.
All forward-looking statements herein speak only as of the date of this Form 10-Q. The Company expressly disclaims any obligation or undertaking to release publicly any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statements to reflect any change in the Companys expectations with regard thereto or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statement is based.
For these statements, the Company claims the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
Foreign currency market risk: A portion of the Companys products are imported from the Far East and Western Europe, Minntech sells a portion of its products outside of the United States, and Minntechs
34
Netherlands subsidiary sells a portion of its products outside of the European Union. Consequently, the Companys business could be materially affected by the imposition of trade barriers, fluctuations in the rates of exchange of various currencies, tariff increases and import and export restrictions, affecting the United States, Canada and The Netherlands.
Carsen imports a substantial portion of its products from the United States and pays for such products in United States dollars. Additionally, a portion of the sales of Biolab and Saf-T-Pak are to customers in the United States. Carsens, Biolabs and Saf-T-Paks businesses could be materially and adversely affected by the imposition of trade barriers, fluctuations in the rates of exchange of various currencies, tariff increases and import and export restrictions between the United States and Canada. Additionally, Carsens, including its Biolab subsidiary, and Saf-T-Paks financial statements are translated using the accounting policies described in note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included within the Companys 2004 Form 10-K. Fluctuations in the rates of currency exchange between the United States and Canada had an overall positive impact for the three months ended October 31, 2004, compared with the three months ended October 31, 2003, upon the Companys results of operations and stockholders equity, as described in Management Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
In order to hedge against the impact of such currency fluctuations on the purchases of inventories, Carsen enters into foreign currency forward contracts on firm purchases of such inventories in United States dollars. These foreign currency forward contracts have been designated as cash flow hedge instruments. Total commitments for such foreign currency forward contracts amounted to $23,876,000 (United States dollars) at October 31, 2004 and cover a portion of Carsens projected purchases of inventories through January 2006.
Changes in the value of the euro against the United States dollar affect the Companys results of operations because a portion of the net assets of Minntechs Netherlands subsidiary are denominated and ultimately settled in United States dollars but must be converted into its functional euro currency. Additionally, financial statements of the Netherlands subsidiary are translated using the accounting policies described in note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included within the Companys 2004 Form 10-K. Fluctuations in the rates of currency exchange between the European Union and the United States had an overall adverse impact for the three months ended October 31, 2004, compared with the three months ended October 31, 2003, upon the Companys results of operations, and had a positive impact upon stockholders equity, as described in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
In order to hedge against the impact of fluctuations in the value of the euro relative to the United States dollar, the Company enters into short-term contracts to purchase euros forward, which contracts are generally one month in duration. These short-term contracts have been designated as fair value hedge instruments. There was one such foreign currency forward contract amounting to 4,171,000 at October 31, 2004 which covers certain assets and liabilities of Minntechs Netherlands subsidiary which are denominated in United States dollars.
35
Such contract expired on November 29, 2004. Under its credit facilities, such contracts to purchase euros may not exceed $12,000,000 in an aggregate notional amount at any time. During the three months ended October 31, 2004, such forward contracts were effective in offsetting the adverse impact of the strengthening of the euro on the Companys results of operations.
The functional currency of Minntechs Japan subsidiary is the Japanese yen. Changes in the value of the Japanese yen relative to the United States dollar during the three months ended October 31, 2004 and 2003 did not have a significant impact upon either the Companys results of operations or the translation of the balance sheet, primarily due to the fact that the Companys Japanese subsidiary accounts for a relatively small portion of consolidated net sales, net income and net assets.
Interest rate market risk: The Company has two credit facilities for which the interest rate on outstanding borrowings is variable. Therefore, interest expense is principally affected by the general level of interest rates in the United States and Canada. During the three months ended October 31, 2004, all of the Companys outstanding borrowings were under its United States credit facilities. In order to protect its interest rate exposure, the Company had entered into a three year interest rate cap that expired on September 7, 2004 covering $12,500,000 of borrowings under the Term Loan Facility, which capped LIBOR on this portion of outstanding borrowings at 4.50%. This interest rate cap agreement had been designated as a cash flow hedge instrument.
Additional information related to market risk sensitive transactions is contained in Part II, Item 7A, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk, in the Companys 2004 Form 10-K.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Companys Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the Securities Exchange Commission and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Companys management, including its Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
The Company, under the supervision and with the participation of its Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer, carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report on Form 10-Q. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer each concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures are effective in providing reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files under the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the
36
time periods specified by the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The Company has evaluated its internal controls over financial reporting and determined that no changes occurred during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal controls over financial reporting.
37
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
See Part I, Item 1. - Note 12 above.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.
The Company did not issue or purchase any unregistered equity securities during the three months ended October 31, 2004.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.
There was no submission of matters to a vote during the three months ended October 31, 2004.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
|
31.1 - |
Certification of Principal Executive Officer. |
|
|
|
|
31.2 - |
Certification of Principal Financial Officer. |
|
|
|
|
32 - |
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
38
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
CANTEL MEDICAL CORP. |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: December 10, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ James P. Reilly |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James P. Reilly, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Craig A. Sheldon |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Craig A. Sheldon, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Steven C. Anaya |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven C. Anaya, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vice President and Controller |
|
39