UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D. C. 20549
ý QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004
OR
o TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 1-7796
TIPPERARY CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Texas |
|
75-1236955 |
(State or other jurisdiction of |
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization) |
|
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
633 Seventeenth Street, Suite 1550 |
|
|
Denver, Colorado |
|
80202 |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
(303) 293-9379
(Issuers telephone number)
Indicate by check mark whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934 during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No ý
State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Class |
|
Outstanding at November 12, 2004 |
|
Common Stock, $.02 par value |
|
41,333,994 shares |
|
TIPPERARY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Index to Form 10-Q
Item 1. Financial Statements
TIPPERARY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Balance Sheets
($in thousands except per share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
8,590 |
|
$ |
2,996 |
|
Receivables |
|
1,292 |
|
1,585 |
|
||
Other current assets |
|
608 |
|
344 |
|
||
Total current assets |
|
10,490 |
|
4,925 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Property, plant and equipment, at cost: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Oil and gas properties, full cost method |
|
127,654 |
|
120,703 |
|
||
Other property and equipment |
|
4,517 |
|
4,431 |
|
||
|
|
132,171 |
|
125,134 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Less accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
(9,062 |
) |
(8,078 |
) |
||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
123,109 |
|
117,056 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Deferred loan costs |
|
4,495 |
|
1,140 |
|
||
Other noncurrent assets |
|
444 |
|
487 |
|
||
|
|
$ |
138,538 |
|
$ |
123,608 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
$ |
4,000 |
|
$ |
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
1,866 |
|
1,883 |
|
||
Accrued liabilities |
|
1,308 |
|
2,329 |
|
||
Royalties payable |
|
135 |
|
75 |
|
||
Total current liabilities |
|
7,309 |
|
4,287 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Long-term debt, net of current portion |
|
90,834 |
|
74,126 |
|
||
Long-term asset retirement obligation |
|
338 |
|
268 |
|
||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 6) |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Minority interest |
|
|
|
418 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Preferred stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cumulative; par value $1.00; 10,000,000 shares authorized; none issued |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Non-cumulative, par value $1.00; 10,000,000 shares authorized; none issued |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Common stock; par value $.02; 50,000,000 shares authorized; 41,343,594 and 39,231,087 shares issued, and 41,333,994 and 39,221,489 shares outstanding as of September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively |
|
827 |
|
785 |
|
||
Capital in excess of par value |
|
158,310 |
|
149,970 |
|
||
Accumulated deficit |
|
(124,583 |
) |
(113,315 |
) |
||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
5,528 |
|
7,094 |
|
||
Treasury stock, at cost; 9,598 shares |
|
(25 |
) |
(25 |
) |
||
Total stockholders equity |
|
40,057 |
|
44,509 |
|
||
|
|
$ |
138,538 |
|
$ |
123,608 |
|
See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
1
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
||||||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Revenues |
|
$ |
2,533 |
|
$ |
1,714 |
|
$ |
5,263 |
|
$ |
4,764 |
|
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Operating |
|
1,483 |
|
1,257 |
|
4,124 |
|
3,320 |
|
||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
539 |
|
455 |
|
1,146 |
|
1,161 |
|
||||
Asset retirement obligation accretion |
|
10 |
|
6 |
|
28 |
|
18 |
|
||||
Impairment of oil and gas properties |
|
|
|
165 |
|
150 |
|
2,386 |
|
||||
General and administrative |
|
2,081 |
|
1,353 |
|
5,635 |
|
4,165 |
|
||||
Total costs and expenses |
|
4,113 |
|
3,236 |
|
11,083 |
|
11,050 |
|
||||
Operating loss |
|
(1,580 |
) |
(1,522 |
) |
(5,820 |
) |
(6,286 |
) |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Interest and other income |
|
42 |
|
13 |
|
149 |
|
30 |
|
||||
Interest expense |
|
(1,791 |
) |
(1,403 |
) |
(6,024 |
) |
(3,883 |
) |
||||
Write-off of deferred loan costs |
|
|
|
(5,069 |
) |
|
|
(5,069 |
) |
||||
Foreign currency exchange gain (loss) |
|
18 |
|
(1,053 |
) |
9 |
|
2,060 |
|
||||
Total other income (expense) |
|
(1,731 |
) |
(7,512 |
) |
(5,866 |
) |
(6,862 |
) |
||||
Loss before income taxes |
|
(3,311 |
) |
(9,034 |
) |
(11,686 |
) |
(13,148 |
) |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Income tax benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Loss before minority interest and cumulative effect of accounting change |
|
(3,311 |
) |
(9,034 |
) |
(11,686 |
) |
(13,148 |
) |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Minority interest in loss (income) of subsidiary |
|
|
|
230 |
|
418 |
|
49 |
|
||||
Loss before cumulative effect of accounting change |
|
(3,311 |
) |
(8,804 |
) |
(11,268 |
) |
(13,099 |
) |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Cumulative effect of accounting change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46 |
) |
||||
Net loss |
|
$ |
(3,311 |
) |
$ |
(8,804 |
) |
$ |
(11,268 |
) |
$ |
(13,145 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net loss per share basic and diluted |
|
$ |
(.08 |
) |
$ |
(.22 |
) |
$ |
(.29 |
) |
$ |
(.34 |
) |
Weighted average shares outstanding basic and diluted |
|
39,553 |
|
39,221 |
|
39,390 |
|
39,221 |
|
See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
2
TIPPERARY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity (Unaudited)
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003 and 2004
(in thousands)
|
|
Common Stock |
|
Capital in excess of |
|
Accumulated |
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive |
|
Treasury Stock |
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
Shares |
|
Amount |
|
par value |
|
Deficit |
|
Income |
|
Shares |
|
Amount |
|
Total |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Balance at December 31, 2002 |
|
39,221 |
|
$ |
785 |
|
$ |
149,953 |
|
$ |
(97,946 |
) |
|
|
10 |
|
$ |
(25 |
) |
$ |
52,767 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,145 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,145 |
) |
||||||
Other comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,663 |
|
|
|
|
|
3,663 |
|
||||||
Comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,482 |
) |
||||||
Compensatory warrants granted for services |
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Balance at September 30, 2003 |
|
39,221 |
|
$ |
785 |
|
$ |
149,970 |
|
$ |
(111,091 |
) |
$ |
3,663 |
|
10 |
|
$ |
(25 |
) |
$ |
43,302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Balance at December 31, 2003 |
|
39,221 |
|
$ |
785 |
|
$ |
149,970 |
|
$ |
(113,315 |
) |
$ |
7,094 |
|
10 |
|
$ |
(25 |
) |
$ |
44,509 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,268 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,268 |
) |
||||||
Other comprehensive loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,566 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(1,566 |
) |
||||||
Comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,834 |
) |
||||||
Issuance of common stock for cash |
|
2,000 |
|
40 |
|
7,960 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,000 |
|
||||||
Compensatory warrants granted for services |
|
|
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81 |
|
||||||
Stock options exercised |
|
113 |
|
2 |
|
299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
301 |
|
||||||
Balance at September 30, 2004 |
|
41,334 |
|
$ |
827 |
|
$ |
158,310 |
|
$ |
(124,583 |
) |
$ |
5,528 |
|
10 |
|
$ |
(25 |
) |
$ |
40,057 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net loss |
|
$ |
(11,268 |
) |
$ |
(13,145 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
1,146 |
|
1,161 |
|
||
Amortization of deferred loan costs |
|
418 |
|
5,770 |
|
||
Compensatory warrants granted |
|
81 |
|
6 |
|
||
Minority interest in loss of subsidiary |
|
(418 |
) |
(49 |
) |
||
Asset retirement obligation accretion |
|
28 |
|
18 |
|
||
Cumulative effect of accounting change |
|
|
|
46 |
|
||
Impairment of oil and gas properties |
|
150 |
|
2,386 |
|
||
Foreign currency exchange gain |
|
|
|
(2,070 |
) |
||
Changes in current assets and current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Decrease (increase) in receivables |
|
293 |
|
(178 |
) |
||
Increase in other current assets |
|
(264 |
) |
(395 |
) |
||
(Decrease) increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
(153 |
) |
823 |
|
||
Increase (decrease) in royalties payable |
|
60 |
|
(41 |
) |
||
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
(9,927 |
) |
(5,668 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Proceeds from asset sales |
|
|
|
2,912 |
|
||
Capital expenditures |
|
(12,858 |
) |
(26,340 |
) |
||
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
(12,858 |
) |
(23,428 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Proceeds from issuance of common stock and exercise of stock options |
|
8,301 |
|
|
|
||
Proceeds from borrowings |
|
94,309 |
|
55,512 |
|
||
Principal repayments |
|
(70,382 |
) |
(27,129 |
) |
||
Decrease in restricted cash |
|
|
|
546 |
|
||
Payments for deferred loan costs |
|
(3,790 |
) |
(362 |
) |
||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
28,438 |
|
28,567 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
(59 |
) |
(130 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
5,594 |
|
(659 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
2,996 |
|
1,725 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
8,590 |
|
$ |
1,066 |
|
See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
TIPPERARY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTE 1 - OPERATIONS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements reflect all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, which are necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position of Tipperary Corporation and its subsidiaries (the Company) at September 30, 2004, and the results of their operations for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 and their cash flows for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2004 and 2003. The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Tipperary Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Tipperary Oil and Gas Corporation, Tipperary CSG Inc., Burro Pipeline Corporation, and its 90%-owned subsidiary, Tipperary Oil and Gas (Australia) Pty Ltd (TOGA). All intercompany balances have been eliminated. The accounting policies followed by the Company are included in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Form 10-K.
New Accounting Pronouncements
The Company follows the full cost method to account for its oil and gas exploration and development activities as more fully described in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,2003. SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin 106 (September 2004) requires estimated future asset retirement obligations to be included in the amortization base, whereby such costs are amortized over proved reserves. Such obligations are to be excluded in the determination of the ceiling for capitalized costs. Compliance with the bulletin, effective in the fourth quarter of 2004, is not expected to have a significant effect on the ceiling calculation or depreciation, depletion and amortization expense.
The Company has reviewed all other recently issued, but not yet adopted, accounting pronouncements and standards to determine their effects, if any, on its results of operations or financial position. Based on its review, the Company believes that none of these pronouncements will have a significant effect on its current or future financial position or results of operations.
On January 1, 2003, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations (SFAS No. 143), which provides accounting requirements for retirement obligations associated with tangible long-lived assets, including the timing of liability recognition, initial measurement of the liability, allocation of asset retirement costs to expense, subsequent measurement of the liability, and financial statement disclosures. SFAS No. 143 requires that asset retirement costs be capitalized along with the cost of the related long-lived asset. The asset retirement costs should then be allocated to expense using a systematic and rational method. The Company has determined that it has asset retirement costs associated with wells drilled in Australia and the United States. The Company also expects to incur retirement costs to dismantle two gas compression plant facilities located in Australia. The following table sets forth the changes in the asset retirement obligation:
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Beginning asset retirement obligation at December 31, 2003 |
|
$ |
268 |
|
Asset retirement obligation accretion |
|
28 |
|
|
Asset retirement obligation additions |
|
42 |
|
|
Payments on asset retirement obligation |
|
|
|
|
Ending asset retirement obligation at September 30, 2004 |
|
$ |
338 |
|
5
Stock-Based Compensation
SFAS Nos. 148 and No. 123 encourage, but do not require, companies to record the compensation cost for stock-based employee compensation plans at fair value. At September 30, 2004, the Company had two stock-based employee option plans and warrants issued to directors and employees. The Company has chosen to continue to account for stock-based compensation using the intrinsic value method prescribed in Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, (APB 25) and has applied the disclosure provisions of SFAS Nos. 123 and 148. Accordingly, compensation cost for fixed stock options and warrants is measured as the excess, if any, of the quoted market price of the Companys stock at the date of the grant over the amount an employee must pay to acquire the stock. Pro forma disclosures as if the Company had adopted the cost recognition provisions of SFAS Nos. 148 and 123 are presented below:
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||
|
|
(in thousands, except per share data) |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net loss, as reported |
|
$ |
(11,268 |
) |
$ |
(13,145 |
) |
Add: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total compensation cost included in reported net loss, net of $0 tax |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Deduct: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total compensation cost determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of $0 tax |
|
(43 |
) |
(110 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Pro forma net loss |
|
$ |
(11,311 |
) |
$ |
(13,255 |
) |
Loss per share |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Basic and dilutedas reported |
|
$ |
(. 29 |
) |
$ |
(.34 |
) |
Basic and dilutedpro forma |
|
$ |
(. 29 |
) |
$ |
(.34 |
) |
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||
|
|
(in thousands, except per share data) |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net loss, as reported |
|
$ |
(3,311 |
) |
$ |
(8,804 |
) |
Add: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total compensation cost included in reported net loss, net of $0 tax |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Deduct: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total compensation cost determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of $0 tax |
|
(14 |
) |
(37 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Pro forma net loss |
|
$ |
(3,325 |
) |
$ |
(8,841 |
) |
Loss per share |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Basic and dilutedas reported |
|
$ |
(. 08 |
) |
$ |
(.22 |
) |
Basic and dilutedpro forma |
|
$ |
(. 08 |
) |
$ |
(.23 |
) |
6
Revenue Recognition and Gas Imbalances
The Company recognizes natural gas and oil revenue from its interests in producing wells as natural gas and oil are produced and sold from those wells. The Company uses the sales method of accounting for these revenues. Under the sales method, revenues are recognized based on actual volumes sold to purchasers. With natural gas production operations, joint owners may take more or less than the production volumes entitled to them under the governing operating agreement. The Company records a natural gas imbalance in other liabilities if its excess takes of natural gas exceed its remaining proved reserves for the property. As of September 30, 2004, the Company had taken and sold more than its entitled share of natural gas volumes produced from the Comet Ridge project, and was overproduced by approximately 1,821 MMcf (net of royalties). Based on the September 30, 2004 average sales price of $1.70 per Mcf, this overproduction represents approximately $3.1 million in gas revenues. No liability has been recorded for the excess volumes taken, as they do not exceed the Companys share of remaining proved reserves. Under the terms of the governing gas balancing agreement, the Company may be required to reduce the monthly volumes it sells by up to 50% of its entitled share of sales, to enable underproduced parties to sell more than their entitled share of the gas sales and cure the imbalance.
Foreign Currency
The functional currency of the Companys Australian subsidiary, TOGA, is the Australian dollar. As the functional currency is the local currency, the current rate method is used to translate Australian dollar financial statements into U.S. dollars for TOGA. All assets and liabilities are translated using current exchange rates, while revenues and expenses are translated at rates in existence when the transactions occurred. The translation adjustment that results from using varying rates in the translation process is reported as a component of other comprehensive income (loss) and is accumulated and reported as a separate component of stockholders equity in the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements.
The cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment (net of $0 tax) as of September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 totaled $5.5 million and $7.1 million, respectively, of other comprehensive income.
The Company had cash and cash equivalents of $8.6 million as of September 30, 2004, compared to approximately $3.0 million as of December 31, 2003. In September 2004, the Company sold two million shares of its common stock in a private placement to 11 unaffiliated institutional investors for $4.00 per share.
The Company anticipates funding operations and capital expenditures in Australia for the remainder of 2004 using funds from a $150 million AUD (approximately $114 million USD) financing facility (see Note 3).
On October 30, 2004, the Company and Tri-Star entered into a settlement agreement covering the litigation between the two parties. Subject to certain events occurring within 45 days of the settlement agreement, the Company will pay $5 million to Tri-Star, and the Company will receive from Tri-Star approximately 96% of the registered titles for the Comet Ridge project and 2.25% working interest in the Comet Ridge project, subject to a 1.5% contractual overriding royalty interest to be retained by Tri-Star. See Note 6. The Company expects to fund this contingent commitment with funds from its available cash and with funds from TOGAs Australian loan facility.
The Company anticipates funding operations and capital expenditures in the United States for the remainder of 2004 using (a) cash on hand at September 30, 2004 and (b) a commitment from Slough Estates USA Inc. (Slough), the Companys majority shareholder, to provide funds for working capital, board-approved capital expenditures and operations through April 2005.
Property, Plant and Equipment
With regards to the aforementioned settlement agreement, the Companys current assessment is that the fair market value of the registered titles collectively is at least the sum of (a) the $5 million the Company would pay Tri-Star and (b) the fair market value of the overriding royalty interest payable to Tri-Star, less (c) the fair market value of the working interest being received from Tri-Star, whereby the $5 million will be recorded as an addition to the Companys Australian
7
full cost pool as the cost of acquiring the titles and working interest, subject to the overriding royalty.
NOTE 2 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
At September 30, 2004, the Company owed Slough and Slough Trading Estates Limited (STEL), a United Kingdom company which is the parent of Slough, approximately $17.0 million.
As of September 30, 2004, the Company had one credit facility agreement with STEL allowing the Company to borrow on an unsecured basis up to $13.0 million for its U.S. operations. Using borrowings from this credit facility, the Company substantially funded its operating and capital needs in the United States during 2003 and through the first nine months of 2004. The Company may repay the loan in whole or in part without prepayment penalties. The credit facility bears interest at 13% per annum and is due April 2, 2012. STEL may demand repayment prior to the maturity date provided that STEL gives 18-months notice. So long as the STEL indebtedness exists, the Company may not obtain any additional third party indebtedness, either secured or unsecured, or making a priority payment in respect of any obligation without first obtaining written approval from STEL. In connection with this credit facility, the Company paid STEL arrangement fees of $40,000. The U.S. dollar value of the outstanding balance of this facility as of September 30, 2004 was $13.0 million.
In 2002, the Company borrowed $4 million from Slough which is evidenced by a note payable that bears interest at LIBOR plus 3.5% (5.30% as of September 30, 2004) and is payable in full on April 30, 2005.
Slough Estates plc, STELs parent, has guaranteed for a period up to five years through June 2009 a bank credit facility of $150.0 million AUD that closed in June 2004 (See Note 3). As consideration for the guarantee, the Company pays 1% per annum on the daily outstanding balance of the debt guaranteed. For the nine month period ended September 30, 2004, the Company had paid guarantee fees of $211,000.
In August 2003, TOGA borrowed $29.7 million ($45 million AUD) from STEL for the sole purpose of paying off a $22 million long-term debt owed TCW Asset Management Company (TCW) and to substantially fund a $7.7 million repurchase of the 6% overriding royalty held by TCW on the Companys Comet Ridge properties. In addition, TOGA borrowed $55.0 million AUD under a credit facility agreement with STEL to fund its operations in Australia. These loans bore interest at 13% per annum. In connection with these loans, the Company paid arrangement fees of $250,000 USD and $100,000 AUD, respectively, to STEL. These loans were paid in full June 18, 2004 with funds from a bank credit facility (see Note 3).
For the nine month period ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, approximately $5.9 million and $2.0 million, respectively, in interest and fees were paid collectively to Slough and STEL under the financing agreements discussed herein.
NOTE 3 - BANK DEBT
On June 9, 2004, TOGA entered into a $150.0 million AUD senior credit facility agreement with Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited and BOS International (Australia) Limited for the purpose of paying in full TOGAs borrowings of $100.0 million AUD from STEL (see Note 2) and to fund TOGAs operating costs and its share of development costs of the Comet Ridge coalseam gas project in Queensland, Australia. Funds from the facility are expected to be available over five years and repayable in variable amounts beginning in 2007 and concluding in 2014. The interest rate for the facility (6.425% per annum as of September 30, 2004) varies with the Australian inter-bank rate plus other factors. Commitment fees of 0.425% per annum of committed but undrawn funds, as defined in the credit facility, are payable semi-annually. The facilitys effective interest rate at September 30, 2004, including interest, commitment and guarantee fees, and amortization of loan costs, is 8.725%. The facility is collateralized by, among other things, TOGAs common stock and the Companys consolidated interest in the Comet Ridge project and is guaranteed for up to five years by Slough Estates plc (See Note 2). The facility contains certain restrictive covenants, including maintenance of certain financial ratios and contains provisions that allow the Company to utilize the facility to finance facility interest expense. The U.S. dollar value of the outstanding balance of this facility and facility interest expense payable as of September 30, 2004 was approximately $77.8 million ($108.9 million AUD). TOGA incurred $4.5 million in loan costs which the Company has deferred and is amortizing over five years.
8
NOTE 4 - LOSS PER SHARE
The following tables set forth the computation of basic and diluted loss per share (EPS) (in thousands except per share data):
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net loss |
|
$ |
(3,311 |
) |
$ |
(8,804 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Weighted-average shares outstanding |
|
39,553 |
|
39,221 |
|
||
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Assumed exercise of dilutive options and warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Weighted-average shares and dilutive potential common shares |
|
39,553 |
|
39,221 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Basic and diluted loss per share |
|
$ |
(.08 |
) |
$ |
(.22 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total options and warrants which could potentially dilute basic EPS in future periods |
|
3,511 |
|
3,573 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net loss |
|
$ |
(11,268 |
) |
$ |
(13,145 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Weighted-average shares outstanding |
|
39,390 |
|
39,221 |
|
||
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Assumed exercise of dilutive options and warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Weighted-average shares and dilutive potential common shares |
|
39,390 |
|
39,221 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Basic and diluted loss per share |
|
$ |
(.29 |
) |
$ |
(.34 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total options and warrants which could potentially dilute basic EPS in future periods |
|
3,511 |
|
3,573 |
|
NOTE 5 - MINORITY INTEREST IN TOGA
For the nine month period ended September 30, 2004, the 10% minority interest share of TOGAs net loss totaled $866,000. The minority interest in TOGAs net equity at January 1, 2004 totaled $418,000, resulting in the Company recognizing an additional loss of $468,000. The Company will continue recognizing 100% of TOGAs net losses until TOGA becomes profitable. The Company will record 100% of TOGAs net income until it has recouped the minority interests share of TOGAs net losses.
9
NOTE 6 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
The Company, TOGA and two unaffiliated working interest owners are plaintiffs in a lawsuit filed in 1998, styled Tipperary Corporation and Tipperary Oil & Gas (Australia) Pty Ltd v. Tri-Star Petroleum Company, James H. Butler, Sr., and James H. Butler, Jr., Cause No. CV42,265, District Court of Midland County, Texas involving the Comet Ridge project. The plaintiffs allege, among other matters, that Tri-Star and/or the individual defendants failed to operate the project in a good and workmanlike manner and committed various other breaches of a joint operating contract, breached a previous mediation agreement, committed certain breaches of fiduciary and other duties owed to the plaintiffs, and committed fraud in connection with the project. Tri-Star has answered the allegations, and filed amended pleadings denying liability and raising a number of affirmative defenses and asserting various counterclaims. TOGA has operated the project since March 2002, after the court entered its Writ of Temporary Injunction (the Injunction) to enforce the votes of a majority-in-interest of the parties under the joint operating agreement to remove Tri-Star as operator and replace it with TOGA.
On October 30, 2004, the Company and Tri-Star entered into a settlement agreement covering this litigation, as well as all other litigation between those parties originating in Queensland, Australia. Among other provisions, the settlement agreement provides that, upon receipt of necessary governmental consents and/or approvals in Queensland, Australia, Tri-Star will transfer to a newly-formed subsidiary of the Company, Tipperary Queensland, Inc., a 2.25% working interest in the Comet Ridge project, subject to a 1.5% contractual overriding royalty interest to be retained by Tri-Star out of the conveyed interest. Tri-Star will also transfer to the Company approximately 96% of each of the registered titles for the Comet Ridge project, including, but not limited to, the relevant Authorities to Prospect and Petroleum Leases. The remaining percentage of the registered titles will be conveyed to two unrelated intervening plaintiffs owning a present interest in the Comet Ridge project, representing their proportionate share of the Project. Upon receipt of the necessary consents and approvals in Queensland and the transfer of the interest subject to the overriding royalty interest, the Company will pay (U.S.) $5 million to Tri-Star and Tri-Star will acknowledge the Companys right to be operator of the Comet Ridge project. The Company anticipates using TOGAs Australian loan facility and existing Tipperary cash to fund the $5 million payment to Tri-Star. Should all necessary governmental consents and approvals be obtained within 45 days of the date of the settlement agreement, the Company and Tri-Star will dismiss all claims against the other in the action in Midland County, Texas with no ability to refile, seek the dismissal of all action pending in Queensland, Australia, and each party will release the other from all liability. If the necessary governmental consents, approvals or conditions in Queensland are denied, not received or otherwise not met within 45 days from the date of the settlement agreement, either party can avoid the settlement agreement and consider the settlement at an end. The District Court in Midland County, Texas has granted a continuance of the action for a period of time sufficient to allow the parties to attempt to obtain the requisite approvals and consents, and fulfill any other conditions, in Queensland, Australia. Should the settlement agreement come to an end, the case will be reassigned to the trial docket in Midland County, Texas.
10
NOTE 7 - OPERATIONS BY GEOGRAPHIC AREA
Segment information has been prepared in accordance with SFAS No. 131, Disclosures About Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information. The Company has two geographic reporting segments, Australia and the United States. General and administrative expenses, interest expense and interest and other income are not allocated to segments. The segment data presented below was prepared on the same basis as the Consolidated Financial Statements. Reportable business segment information as of September 30, 2004 and 2003 and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 is as follows (in thousands):
As of and for the three months ended September 30, 2004
|
|
Gas and Oil Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
Australia |
|
United States |
|
Total |
|
Non-Segmented Items |
|
Total |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Revenues |
|
$ |
2,531 |
|
$ |
2 |
|
$ |
2,533 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
2,533 |
|
Income (loss) before minority interest and income taxes |
|
773 |
|
(258 |
) |
515 |
|
(3,826 |
)(1) |
(3,311 |
) |
|||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
112,838 |
|
9,873 |
|
122,711 |
|
398 |
|
123,109 |
|
|||||
(1) Includes $975,000 of legal expenses for the Tri-Star trial (see Note 6) and $1.1 million of other general and administrative expenses, and $1.8 million of interest expense.
As of and for the three months ended September 30, 2003
|
|
Gas and Oil Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
Australia |
|
United States |
|
Total |
|
Non-Segmented Items |
|
Total |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Revenues |
|
$ |
1,710 |
|
$ |
4 |
|
$ |
1,714 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
1,714 |
|
Income (loss) before minority interest and income taxes |
|
287 |
|
(443 |
) |
(156 |
) |
(8,878 |
)(1) |
(9,034 |
) |
|||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
96,637 |
|
6,139 |
|
102,776 |
|
390 |
|
103,166 |
|
|||||
(1) Includes $1.4 million of general and administrative expenses, $1.4 million of interest expense, $5.1 million of write-off of deferred loan costs and $1.1 million of foreign currency exchange loss.
As of and for the nine months ended September 30, 2004
|
|
Gas and Oil Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
Australia |
|
United States |
|
Total |
|
Non-Segmented Items |
|
Total |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Revenues |
|
$ |
5,256 |
|
$ |
7 |
|
$ |
5,263 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
5,263 |
|
Income (loss) before minority interest and income taxes |
|
746 |
|
(889 |
) |
(143 |
) |
(11,543 |
)(1) |
(11,686 |
) |
|||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
112,838 |
|
9,873 |
|
122,711 |
|
398 |
|
123,109 |
|
|||||
(1) Includes $1.9 million of legal expenses for the Tri-Star trial (see Note 6) and $3.7 million of other general and administrative expenses and $6.0 million of interest expense.
11
As of and for the nine months ended September 30, 2003
|
|
Gas and Oil Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
Australia |
|
United States |
|
Total |
|
Non-Segmented Items |
|
Total |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Revenues |
|
$ |
4,753 |
|
$ |
11 |
|
$ |
4,764 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
4,764 |
|
Income (loss) before minority interest and income taxes |
|
963 |
|
(3,046 |
) |
(2,083 |
) |
(11,065 |
)(1) |
(13,148 |
) |
|||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
96,637 |
|
6,139 |
|
102,776 |
|
390 |
|
103,166 |
|
|||||
(1) Includes $4.2 million of general and administrative expenses, $3.9 million of interest expense, $5.1 million of write-off of deferred loan costs and $2.1 million of foreign currency exchange gain.
NOTE 8 - PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
A summary of property, plant and equipment follows:
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Evaluated oil and gas properties: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Australian properties |
|
$ |
105,451 |
|
$ |
105,264 |
|
Domestic properties |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Unevaluated oil and gas properties: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Australian properties |
|
12,330 |
|
9,221 |
|
||
Domestic properties |
|
9,874 |
|
6,218 |
|
||
Oil and gas properties |
|
127,655 |
|
120,703 |
|
||
Other property and equipment |
|
4,516 |
|
4,431 |
|
||
|
|
132,171 |
|
125,134 |
|
||
Less accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
(9,062 |
) |
(8,078 |
) |
||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
$ |
123,109 |
|
$ |
117,056 |
|
NOTE 9 - STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
||||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||||
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Cash paid during the period for interest, net of amounts capitalized |
|
$ |
4,734 |
|
$ |
2,860 |
|
||
Non-cash investing and financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net increase in payables for capital expenditures |
|
$ |
885 |
|
$ |
|
|
||
12
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis
Information within this report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that are based on managements beliefs, assumptions, current expectations, estimates and projections about the oil and gas industry, the world economy and about the Company itself. Words such as may, will, expect, anticipate, estimate or continue, or comparable words are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. In addition, all statements other than statements of historical facts that address activities that the Company expects or anticipates will or may occur in the future are forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict with regard to timing, extent, likelihood and degree of occurrence. Therefore, actual results and outcomes may materially differ from what may be expressed or forecasted in such forward-looking statements. Furthermore, the Company undertakes no obligation to update, amend or clarify forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Readers are encouraged to read the SEC filings of the Company, particularly its Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, for meaningful cautionary language and discussion of risk factors disclosing why actual results may vary materially from those anticipated by management.
Overview
Australia
The Companys activities in Australia are conducted substantially through Tipperary Corporations 90%-owned Australian subsidiary, Tipperary Oil & Gas (Australia) Pty Ltd (TOGA). As of September 30, 2004, the Company owned a 73% undivided capital-bearing interest in the Comet Ridge project in Queensland, Australia. This project comprises approximately 1,230,500 acres in the Bowen Basin, which includes five petroleum leases covering approximately 288,000 acres, Authority to Prospect (ATP) 526 covering approximately 712,000 acres, ATP 653 covering approximately 96,000 acres and ATP 745 covering approximately 135,000 acres. The Company also holds 100% of ATP 655, which is near the Comet Ridge project and covers approximately 77,000 acres.
An ATP allows the holder to undertake a range of exploration activities, including geophysical surveys, field mapping and exploratory drilling. Each ATP requires the expenditure of an amount of exploration costs as determined by Queenslands Department of Natural Resources and Mines (Queensland DNRM) and is subject to renewal every four years. Once a petroleum resource is identified, the holder of an ATP may apply for a petroleum lease, which provides the lessee with the ability to conduct additional exploration, development and production activities.
With respect to ATP 653, the Company filed and received a variance to combine year two expenditure requirements with those of year three and to drill a horizontal well eliminating the obligation to drill two conventional wells. Drilling of the horizontal well is expected to commence in late 2004 or early 2005. The Company has completed expenditure requirements for ATPs 745 and 655.
Upon expiration of an ATP, the policy of the Queensland DNRM allows the ATP holder to renew the ATP for an additional four year exploratory period and generally requires the holder to relinquish a 20% portion of ATP acreage not held by a petroleum lease. ATP 526 expired on October 31, 2004, and an application has been filed with the Queensland DNRM for the renewal of ATP 526. With regards to renewal, there will be discussion with the Queensland DNRM of establishing petroleum leases on acreage that is part of ATP 526 and ATP 653. ATPs 653, 655 and 745 have initial terms expiring on September 30, 2006, October 31, 2007 and October 31, 2007, respectively.
The Companys gas marketing in eastern Australia is currently focused on obtaining long-term gas sales agreements that provide five to 15 years of firm sales typically starting in 2006 to 2008. Short-term sales contracts are also being pursued. Effective July 2004, the Company commenced selling gas under two short-term sales contracts, one for six months and one for 12 months.
13
The following table summarizes field development progress on the Comet Ridge project as of September 30, 2004. In December 2003, the Company began using its second compression plant facility, which increased the fields gas compression capacity to approximately 38 million cubic feet (MMcf) per day.
Comet Ridge Operations Review
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
Well Status (Number of Wells) |
|
|
|
Selling |
|
46 |
|
Dewatering or temporarily shut-in |
|
30 |
|
Producing |
|
76 |
|
Being evaluated |
|
21 |
|
Injection/monitoring wells |
|
2 |
|
To be plugged and abandoned |
|
2 |
|
Plugged and abandoned |
|
3 |
|
Total drilled |
|
104 |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Daily Volumes (MMcf) |
|
|
|
Sold |
|
29 |
|
Flared |
|
1 |
|
Used for compression fuel |
|
3 |
|
Produced |
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) This table shows the status of wells drilled at September 30, 2004 and gross daily volumes on that same date. Average gross daily volumes for the quarter may differ. Net sales volumes are discussed in the Companys results of operations.
The Company drilled two exploratory wells on the Comet Ridge project during the first nine months of 2004. The 2004 drilling was substantially funded with borrowings from Slough Trading Estates Limited (STEL) and an Australian bank senior credit facility described in Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Future 2004 development and exploratory costs will be funded by the Australian bank senior credit facility.
During the first half of 2004, 100% of the Companys gas sales in Australia were made under a five-year contract effective June 1, 2000 with ENERGEX Retail Pty Ltd (Energex), an unaffiliated customer. The Energex contract has delivery requirements of up to approximately 15,000 Mcf of gas per day. The Company has a gas sales agreement with Origin Energy Retail Limited (OERL), a subsidiary of Origin Energy Limited, to supply approximately 9 Bcf per year, or approximately 25,000 Mcf of gas per day net to the Companys interests, for 13 years beginning May 2007. Origin Energy Limited is a large Australian integrated energy company which, through subsidiaries, owns nearly 24% of the Comet Ridge project.
14
During the third quarter of 2004, the Company sold its gas under three contracts, the Energex contract discussed above and two new short-term contracts that commenced in July 2004 - one six month contract with Energex and one 12 month contract with Santos QNT Pty Ltd. With the new short-term contracts and increased demand, the Companys sales increased to 1,505 MMcf for the third quarter in 2004, a 60% increase over the second quarters sales of 938 MMcf and a 31% increase over the prior years quarter.
Effective September 30, 2004, the Company and Queensland Fertilizer Assets Limited (QFAL) extended until December 31, 2004 the Companys gas sales agreement with QFAL to supply 210 Bcf of gas to QFAL over a 20-year period beginning in early 2007 to a fertilizer plant QFAL is proposing to construct in southeastern Queensland. The Company does not yet know if the plant will be built and may in 2005 discontinue the agreement.
United States
Lay Creek The Company holds a 50% working interest in Lay Creek, a coalseam gas project located in Moffat County, Colorado. The project includes various leasehold interests covering over 82,000 gross acres. Koch Exploration Company (Koch), an unaffiliated third party, holds the remaining 50% working interest and operates the project. The Company is currently evaluating the gas and water production from pilot wells in order to determine economic viability of the production. Gas production in excess of 300 Mcf per day from nine wells is currently being flared. The Company is investigating pipeline connections and expects to begin selling gas in 2005.
Frenchman The Company holds a 25% interest in the Frenchman prospect in eastern Colorado. Total gross acreage in the prospect is approximately 162,000 acres. The Houston Exploration Company (Houston Exploration) holds the remaining 75% interest and is the operator of the prospect. Houston Exploration recently acquired this interest from Kerr-McGee Rocky Mountain Corporation (Kerr-McGee). During 2003, five wells were drilled on the Frenchman prospect by Kerr-McGee. Three of these wells were completed, and two were plugged and abandoned. In 2004, the Company drilled five additional Frenchman wells in which the former operator, Kerr-McGee, elected not to participate. The Company has a 100% interest in these wells. The Company believes four of these 100% wells will be commercial producers, and the Company will earn 100% of offsetting drill sites as set forth in the operating agreement the Company had with Kerr-McGee. The Company plugged and abandoned the other well drilled. In the first quarter of 2004, the Company recorded an asset impairment expense of $150,000 related to unsuccessful exploration costs incurred on wells on the Frenchman prospect. Two more wells are expected to be drilled by the Company on 100% owned acreage in the fourth quarter of 2004 at a cost to the Company of approximately $420,000. Further seismic work is expected to be conducted during the fourth quarter of 2004. The Company expects to build a gathering system at a cost of approximately $200,000 to the Company, connect to a nearby pipeline and begin selling gas in early in 2005.
Republican The Company holds a 20% interest in the Republican prospect in eastern Colorado. Total gross acreage in the prospect is approximately 170,000 acres. Houston Exploration, which acquired Kerr-McGees interest in the project, holds the remaining 80% interest and is the operator of the prospect. Five wells were drilled on the Republican prospect in 2004 by Kerr-McGee, and the economics of connecting these wells to nearby pipelines are being evaluated. Houston Exploration and the Company are currently evaluating additional drilling locations to be drilled during the fourth quarter of 2004, and expect to begin a large 3-D seismic acquisition program in 2005.
Stateline The Company holds a 25% interest in the Stateline prospect in western Nebraska. Total gross acreage in the prospect is approximately 120,000 acres. Lance Oil & Gas Company, Inc. (Lance) holds the remaining 75% interest and is the operator of the prospect. In the first half of 2004, preliminary 2-D seismic operations were conducted at a cost to the Company of approximately $100,000. The acquisition of 3D seismic data is now planned for early 2005 at a cost to the Company of approximately $163,500.
Sand Hill During late 2003, the Company acquired leasehold acreage in western Nebraska totaling approximately 51,000 gross acres, the Sand Hill prospect. This acreage is located in the vicinity of the Companys Frenchman, Republican and Stateline prospects. The Company may sell an interest in the prospect to recover its investment and retain an interest in this acreage. Alternatively, the Company may elect to explore and develop this prospect independently. The Company intends to commence a seismic program in the fourth quarter of 2004 at an estimated cost of $600,000.
15
Nine Mile The Company holds a 70% interest in the prospective acreage and 40% interest in the outlying acreage of the Nine Mile prospect, a conventional oil and gas exploration prospect, also located in Moffat County, Colorado, and serves as operator of the prospect. The prospect comprises approximately 38,000 gross acres. The Company is currently evaluating exploratory work performed in 2002 and 2003 and is seeking industry partners before resuming exploratory activity.
Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Company had cash and cash equivalents of $8.6 million as of September 30, 2004, compared to approximately $3.0 million as of December 31, 2003. In September 2004, the Company sold two million shares of its common stock in a private placement to 11 unaffiliated institutional investors for $4.00 per share. The Company has funded operations, deferred loan costs associated with obtaining TOGAs senior credit facility and capital expenditures for the nine months ended September 30, 2004, using primarily (a) cash on hand at December 31, 2003 and (b) borrowings from STEL and from TOGAs senior credit facilities.
On October 30, 2004, the Company and Tri-Star entered into a settlement agreement covering the litigation between the two parties. Subject to certain events occurring within 45 days of the settlement agreement, the Company will pay $5 million to Tri-Star, and the Company will receive from Tri-Star approximately 96% of the registered titles for the Comet Ridge project and a 2.25% working interest in the Comet Ridge project, subject to a 1.5% contractual overriding royalty interest to be retained by Tri-Star. See Note 6. The Company expects to fund this contingent commitment with funds from its available cash and with funds from TOGAs Australian loan facility.
Shortly after the settlement agreement was reached, Slough Estates plc, parent of Slough and STEL, publicly announced that it will consider its options for exiting from its investment in Tipperary. The Company will be conducting discussions with Slough relating to this announcement. TOGAs $150 million AUD bank facility entered into on June 9, 2004, provides that Slough Estates plc, as parent of Tipperarys majority shareholder and as recourse guarantor of the bank facility, cannot divest of controlling interest of Tipperary during the ten-year term of the loan without approval by the facilitys lenders, acting reasonably. In addition, STELs lending agreement with Tipperary requires STEL to give Tipperary 18 months notice for repayment of the amounts borrowed by Tipperary. At September 30, 2004, the outstanding borrowings on the Australian Bank Facility were $108.9 million AUD, and the outstanding borrowings on the STEL lending agreement were $13.0 million USD.
The Company anticipates funding operations and capital expenditures in Australia for the remainder of 2004 using funds from a $150 million AUD (approximately $114 million USD) credit facility. See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
The Company anticipates funding operations and capital expenditures in the United States for 2004 using (a) cash on hand at September 30, 2004 and (b) a commitment from Slough to provide funds for working capital, board-approved capital expenditures and operations through April 2005.
Net cash used by operating activities was $10.6 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2004, compared to $5.7 million of cash used during the same period last year. The increase in net cash used for operations in the first nine months of 2004 compared with the same period in 2003 resulted primarily from (a) interest expense on increased debt used to fund property acquisition, exploration and development and (b) higher operating costs and general and administrative expenses.
On June 9, 2004, TOGA entered into a $150.0 million AUD senior credit facility agreement with Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited and BOS International (Australia) Limited. The initial borrowings under the facility totaled $103.0 million AUD ($71.0 million USD). TOGA used $100.0 million AUD ($68.2 million USD) to pay in full its borrowings from STEL and to pay debt issuance costs. The balance of the credit facility will be used to fund TOGAs operating costs and its share of development costs of the Comet Ridge coalseam gas project in Queensland, Australia.
16
The table below provides an analysis of capital expenditures of $12.9 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2004.
Capital Expenditures Activity
(in thousands)
Australia: |
|
|
|
||
Comet Ridge drilling and completion |
|
$ |
7,169 |
|
|
Comet Ridge facilities and equipment |
|
126 |
|
||
ATP 655 exploration |
|
782 |
|
||
Capitalized interest |
|
817 |
|
||
Other |
|
186 |
|
||
Domestic: |
|
|
|
||
Leasehold acquisitions |
|
967 |
|
||
Capitalized interest |
|
388 |
|
||
Lay Creek drilling and completion |
|
1,636 |
|
||
Frenchman drilling and completion |
|
670 |
|
||
Other |
|
117 |
|
||
Total |
|
$ |
12,858 |
|
|
Capital expenditures for the first nine months of 2004 were funded principally under credit facilities with STEL and the Australian bank senior credit facility.
The Company has various commitments in addition to its long-term debt. The table below summarizes the Companys contractual obligations for the last three months of 2004 and years 2005 through 2007 and thereafter (in thousands):
Contractual Obligation |
|
Total |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
Thereafter |
|
||||||
Long-term debt |
|
$ |
90,834 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
2,100 |
|
$ |
88,734 |
|
Operating leases for office space |
|
$ |
999 |
|
$ |
80 |
|
$ |
319 |
|
$ |
324 |
|
$ |
265 |
|
$ |
11 |
|
Operating leases for equipment |
|
$ |
282 |
|
$ |
44 |
|
$ |
162 |
|
$ |
44 |
|
$ |
32 |
|
$ |
|
|
Standby drilling fees |
|
$ |
60 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
60 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Petroleum lease expenditures |
|
$ |
1,100 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
550 |
|
$ |
275 |
|
$ |
275 |
|
$ |
|
|
Asset retirement obligation |
|
$ |
5,034 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
5,034 |
|
17
Results of Operations - Comparison of the Three Months Ended September 30, 2004 and 2003
Unless otherwise indicated, the discussion below compares the quarter ended September 30, 2004 to the quarter ended September 30, 2003. The Company incurred a net loss of $3.3 million compared to a net loss of $8.8 million. An increase in revenues for 2004 was offset by higher legal expenses related to Tri-Star litigation included within general and administrative costs . The greater net loss for the 2003 quarter was primarily due to (a) a $5.1 million write-off of deferred loan costs and (b) a $1.1 million foreign currency exchange loss. The table below provides a comparison of operations, respectively. It is intended to provide a comparative review of significant operational items. Accordingly, nominal differences may exist from the amounts presented in the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
Increase |
|
% Increase |
|
|||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
(Decrease) |
|
|||
|
|
($ in thousands, except average per Mcf prices and costs) |
|
|||||||||
Worldwide operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Operating revenue |
|
$ |
2,533 |
|
$ |
1,714 |
|
$ |
819 |
|
48 |
% |
Gas volumes (MMcf) |
|
1,506 |
|
1,149 |
|
357 |
|
31 |
% |
|||
Average gas price per Mcf |
|
$ |
1.68 |
|
$ |
1.49 |
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
13 |
% |
Operating expenses |
|
$ |
1,483 |
|
$ |
1,256 |
|
$ |
227 |
|
18 |
% |
Average lifting cost per Mcf equivalent (Mcfe) sold |
|
$ |
0.99 |
|
$ |
1.09 |
|
$ |
(0.10 |
) |
(9 |
)% |
General and administrative |
|
$ |
2,081 |
|
$ |
1,353 |
|
$ |
728 |
|
54 |
% |
Depreciation, depletion and amortization (DD&A) |
|
$ |
539 |
|
$ |
455 |
|
$ |
84 |
|
18 |
% |
Impairment of oil and gas properties |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
165 |
|
$ |
(165 |
) |
N/A |
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
1,791 |
|
$ |
1,403 |
|
$ |
388 |
|
28 |
% |
Write-off of deferred loan costs |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
5,069 |
|
$ |
(5,069 |
) |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Australia operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Operating revenue |
|
$ |
2,531 |
|
$ |
1,710 |
|
$ |
821 |
|
48 |
% |
Gas volumes (MMcf) |
|
1,505 |
|
1,149 |
|
356 |
|
31 |
% |
|||
Average gas price per Mcf |
|
$ |
1.68 |
|
$ |
1.49 |
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
13 |
% |
Operating expenses |
|
$ |
1,229 |
|
$ |
978 |
|
$ |
251 |
|
26 |
% |
Average lifting cost per Mcf sold |
|
$ |
0.82 |
|
$ |
0.85 |
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
(4 |
)% |
Oil and gas property DD&A |
|
$ |
488 |
|
$ |
417 |
|
$ |
71 |
|
17 |
% |
Other DD&A |
|
$ |
37 |
|
$ |
25 |
|
$ |
12 |
|
48 |
% |
Oil and Gas DD&A rate per Mcf volumes sold |
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
(11 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Domestic operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Operating revenue |
|
$ |
2 |
|
$ |
4 |
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
(50 |
)% |
Gas volumes (MMcf) |
|
0.5 |
|
0.7 |
|
(.2 |
) |
(29 |
)% |
|||
Average gas price per Mcf |
|
$ |
4.54 |
|
$ |
4.08 |
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
11 |
% |
Operating expenses producing properties |
|
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
3 |
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
(67 |
)% |
Average lifting cost on producing properties per Mcfe sold |
|
$ |
2.94 |
|
$ |
3.86 |
|
$ |
(0.92 |
) |
(24 |
)% |
Operating expenses non-producing properties |
|
$ |
253 |
|
$ |
275 |
|
$ |
(22 |
) |
(8 |
)% |
Other DD&A |
|
$ |
14 |
|
$ |
13 |
|
$ |
1 |
|
8 |
% |
18
Revenues and Sales Volumes
The Company is currently selling its Australian gas under three contracts to two purchasers. Energex is purchasing gas from the Company under a five-year contract with delivery requirements of up to 15,000 Mcf of gas per day and under a new short-term contract that terminates December 31, 2004. The Company also entered into a one year gas sales contract with Santos QNT Pty Ltd effective July 2004. The Company is actively pursuing long-term and short-term gas contracts to increase gas sales. With the addition of the two new short-term contracts, the Companys sales increased to 1,505 MMcf for the third quarter in 2004, a 60% increase over the second quarters sales of 938 MMcf and a 31% increase over the same period in 2003. Gas revenues in Australia for the third quarter increased by 48% due to higher sales volumes and a 13% increase in average gas prices. Changes in the exchange rate and the addition of a new gas sales contract with higher prices resulted in the increase in average gas prices.
During the third quarter of 2004, the Company had minimal domestic revenue. Domestic revenues and volumes in 2004 and 2003 relate to small, retained interests in properties producing in the Powder River Basin in Wyoming.
Costs and Expenses
Operating expenses in Australia increased 26% due to the addition of a second compressor facility which commenced operations in December 2003 and well workover costs. Australian oil and gas property DD&A expense increased 17% due principally to higher sales volumes.
Domestic operating expenses in the third quarter of 2004 and 2003 are principally attributable to the Lay Creek coal-seam gas project where the wells are in the dewatering phase.
General and administrative (G&A) expenses for the third quarter of 2004 increased 54% compared to the same period in 2003, due principally to an increase in legal costs of approximately $583,000 incurred for the Tri-Star litigation. With the execution of the Settlement Agreement with Tri-Star in October 2004, the Company expects legal expenses to be significantly lower in 2005.
Other Income (Expense)
Interest expense increased to $1.8 million from $1.4 million in 2003, due primarily to increased borrowings to fund operations and capital expenditures. As of September 30, 2004, the Companys total debt was $94.8 million compared with $58.2 million as of September 30, 2003, an increase of $36.6 million. The interest expense associated with increased borrowings was partially offset by the effect of lower interest rates on TOGAs long-term debt. As a result of refinancing TOGAs debt, TOGAs interest rates decreased from 13% to an average effective rate of 8.725% per annum, which reduced the Companys total debt effective rate from 12.7% to 9.19%.
In the third quarter of 2003, the Company wrote off $5.1 million in deferred loan costs related to the TCW loan which was retired on August 15, 2003. In accordance with SFAS No. 52, Foreign Currency Translation (SFAS 52), the Company recognized a foreign currency exchange loss of $1.1 million related to the TOGA debt repaid.
Minority Interest in Loss of Subsidiary
During the third quarter of 2004, the Company recognized 100% of TOGAs net loss as the minority interest in TOGAS net equity had been reduced to zero at June 30, 2004.
19
Results of Operations - Comparison of the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004 and 2003
Unless otherwise indicated, the discussion below compares the nine months ended September 30, 2004 to the nine months ended September 30, 2003. The Company incurred a net loss of $11.3 million compared to a net loss of $13.1 million. A 10% increase in revenues was offset by increases in operating costs and general and administrative expenses. Increased debt to fund property exploration and development caused interest expense to increase. An additional expense attributed to the write-off of deferred loan costs partially offset by a foreign currency exchange gain was recorded in 2003. The table below provides a comparison of operations. It is intended to provide a comparative review of significant operational items. Accordingly, nominal differences may exist from the amounts presented in the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
Increase |
|
% Increase |
|
|||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
(Decrease) |
|
|||
|
|
($ in thousands, except average per Mcf prices and costs) |
|
|||||||||
Worldwide operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Operating revenue |
|
$ |
5,263 |
|
$ |
4,764 |
|
$ |
499 |
|
10 |
% |
Gas volumes (MMcf) |
|
3,095 |
|
3,332 |
|
(237 |
) |
(7 |
)% |
|||
Average gas price per Mcf |
|
$ |
1.70 |
|
$ |
1.43 |
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
19 |
% |
Operating expenses |
|
$ |
4,124 |
|
$ |
3,320 |
|
$ |
804 |
|
24 |
% |
Average lifting cost per Mcf equivalent (Mcfe) sold |
|
$ |
1.33 |
|
$ |
1.00 |
|
$ |
.33 |
|
33 |
% |
General and administrative |
|
$ |
5,635 |
|
$ |
4,165 |
|
$ |
1,470 |
|
35 |
% |
Depreciation, depletion and amortization (DD&A) |
|
$ |
1,146 |
|
$ |
1,161 |
|
$ |
(15 |
) |
(1 |
)% |
Impairment of oil and gas properties |
|
$ |
150 |
|
$ |
2,386 |
|
$ |
(2,236 |
) |
(94 |
)% |
Interest expense |
|
$ |
6,024 |
|
$ |
3,883 |
|
$ |
2,141 |
|
55 |
% |
Write-off of deferred loan costs |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
5,069 |
|
$ |
(5,069 |
) |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Australia operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Operating revenue |
|
$ |
5,256 |
|
$ |
4,753 |
|
$ |
503 |
|
11 |
% |
Gas volumes (MMcf) |
|
3,093 |
|
3,330 |
|
(237 |
) |
(7 |
)% |
|||
Average gas price per Mcf |
|
$ |
1.70 |
|
$ |
1.43 |
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
19 |
% |
Operating expenses |
|
$ |
3,394 |
|
$ |
2,660 |
|
$ |
734 |
|
28 |
% |
Average lifting cost per Mcf sold |
|
$ |
1.10 |
|
$ |
0.80 |
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
38 |
% |
Oil and Gas property DD&A |
|
$ |
998 |
|
$ |
1,070 |
|
$ |
(72 |
) |
(7 |
)% |
Other DD&A |
|
$ |
106 |
|
$ |
53 |
|
$ |
53 |
|
100 |
% |
Oil and Gas DD&A rate per Mcf volumes sold |
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Domestic operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Operating revenue |
|
$ |
7 |
|
$ |
11 |
|
$ |
(4 |
) |
(36 |
)% |
Gas volumes (MMcf) |
|
2 |
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Average gas price per Mcf |
|
$ |
4.19 |
|
$ |
3.99 |
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
5 |
% |
Operating expenses producing properties |
|
$ |
4 |
|
$ |
6 |
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
(33 |
)% |
Average lifting cost on producing properties per Mcfe sold |
|
$ |
2.49 |
|
$ |
2.58 |
|
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
(3 |
)% |
Operating expenses non-producing properties |
|
$ |
726 |
|
$ |
654 |
|
$ |
72 |
|
11 |
% |
Impairment of oil and gas properties |
|
$ |
150 |
|
$ |
2,386 |
|
$ |
(2,236 |
) |
(94 |
)% |
Other DD&A |
|
$ |
42 |
|
$ |
38 |
|
$ |
4 |
|
11 |
% |
20
Revenues and Sales Volumes
The Company is currently selling its Australian gas under three contracts to two purchasers. Energex is purchasing gas from the Company under a five-year contract with delivery requirements of up to 15,000 Mcf of gas per day and under a new short-term contract that terminates December 31, 2004. The Company entered into a one year gas sales contract with Santos QNT Pty Ltd. effective July 2004. The addition of two new gas sales contracts effective July 2004 increased gas sales for the third quarter 2004 by 31% over the same period in 2003 and minimized the decline in gas volumes sold in Australia to 7% for the nine month period 2004 compared with the same period in 2003. The Company is actively pursuing long-term and short-term gas contracts to increase gas volumes sold. A decrease in volumes sold for the nine month period ended September 30, 2004 compared with the same period in 2003 was offset by a 19% increase in average gas prices. Changes in the exchange rate and the addition of a new gas sales contract with higher prices resulted in the increase in average gas prices.
During the first nine months of 2004, the Company had minimal domestic revenue. Domestic revenues and volumes in 2004 and 2003 relate to small, retained interests in properties producing in the Powder River Basin in Wyoming.
Costs and Expenses
Operating expenses in Australia increased 28% due to an increase in the number of producing wells, increased well workover costs, gas transportation expense and the addition of a second compressor facility which commenced operations in December 2003. Australian oil and gas property DD&A expense decreased 7% due principally to lower sales volumes.
Domestic operating expenses in the first nine months of 2004 and 2003 were principally attributable to the Lay Creek coal-seam gas project where the wells are in the dewatering phase.
The impairment expense of $150,000 was attributed to unsuccessful exploration costs incurred on wells on the Frenchman prospect. Impairment expense of approximately $2.4 million in 2003 was attributed largely to unsuccessful exploration on the Nine Mile prospect.
General and administrative (G&A) expenses for the first nine months of 2004 increased 35% compared to the same period in 2003 due principally to an increase in legal costs of approximately $828,000 for the Tri-Star litigation and higher employee and consulting costs associated with managing the Comet Ridge properties. With the execution of the Settlement Agreement with Tri-Star in October 2004, the Company expects legal expenses to be significantly lower in 2005.
Other Income (Expense)
Interest expense increased to $6.0 million from $3.9 million, due primarily to increased borrowings to fund operations and capital expenditures. As of September 30, 2004, the Companys total debt was $94.8 million compared with $58.2 million as of September 30, 2003, an increase of $36.6 million. The interest expense associated with increased borrowings was partially offset by the effect of lower interest rates on TOGAs long-term debt. As a result of refinancing TOGAs debt, TOGAs interest rates decreased from 13% to an average effective rate of 8.725% per annum, which reduced the Companys total debt effective rate from 12.7% to 9.19%.
In the first nine months of 2003, the Company wrote off $5.1 million in deferred loan costs related to TCW loan which was retired on August 15, 2003. In accordance with SFAS No. 52, the Company recognized a foreign currency exchange gain of $2.1 million related to the TOGA debt repaid.
21
Critical Accounting Policies
The Companys financial statements are based on the selection and application of significant accounting policies, some of which require management to make estimates and assumptions which affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and also affect the disclosure of contingent items. A summary of the Companys significant accounting policies is included in Item 7 of the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003. The Company believes that the significant accounting policies discussed therein are some of the more critical judgment areas in application of its accounting policies that currently affect its financial condition and results of operations.
Off-balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not currently have and have never had any relationships with unconsolidated
entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as
structured finance or special purposes entities, which typically are
established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or
other contractually narrow or limited purposes. Further, we have
not guaranteed any obligations of unconsolidated entities nor do we have any
commitment or intent to provide funding to any such entities.
Accordingly, we are not materially exposed to any financing, liquidity,
market or credit risk that could arise if we had engaged in these
relationships.
22
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk
Market risk is the potential loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices, such as foreign currency exchange, interest rates and commodity prices. The Company does not use financial instruments to any degree to manage foreign currency, interest rate or commodity risk and does not hold or issue financial instruments to any degree for trading purposes. Our Australian debt facility has a variable interest rate. Fluctuations in the interest rate could increase or decrease our interest expense. At September 30, 2004, we had approximately $76.5 million ($107.0 million AUD) in outstanding variable rate debt. If the interest rate for our variable rate debt increased or decreased by 1%, our annual interest expense would increase or decrease by approximately $760,000. In addition, at September 30, 2004, the Company was exposed to some market risk with respect to foreign currency and natural gas prices; however, management does not believe such risk to be material.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, we evaluated, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures over financial reporting pursuant to Rule 13a-15 and 15d-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures over financial reporting are adequate and effective in timely alerting them to material information required to be included in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q.
Disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and implemented, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving an entitys disclosure objectives. The likelihood of achieving such objectives is affected by limitations inherent in disclosure controls and procedures. These limitations include the fact that human judgment in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns in internal control can occur because of human failures such as simple errors or mistakes or because of intentional circumvention of the established process.
During the period covered by this report, there have been no significant changes in our internal controls over financial reporting or in other factors, which could significantly affect internal controls over financial reporting.
23
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
See Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements under Part I - Item 1.
Item 2. Changes in Securities
During the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004, the Company sold and issued two million shares of its common stock in a private placement to 11 unaffiliated institutional investors for $4.00 per share. The issuance of these securities was deemed to be exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 as a transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering. The offerees and purchasers were institutional investors who represented that they were purchasing the shares for investment purposes and acknowledged that the certificates in respect of the shares would be affixed with a restrictive legend.
Item 6. Exhibits
(a) Exhibits:
Filed herewith
31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Tipperary Corporation Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350.
32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Tipperary Corporation Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350.
The other exhibits of the Company are incorporated herein by reference to the exhibit list in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.
24
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
Tipperary Corporation |
|
|
|
Registrant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: |
November 15, 2004 |
By: |
/s/ David L. Bradshaw |
|
|
|
David L. Bradshaw, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: |
November 15, 2004 |
By: |
/s/ Joseph B. Feiten |
|
|
|
Joseph B. Feiten, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer |
|
|
|
|
25
31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Tipperary Corporation Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350.
32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Tipperary Corporation Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350.
26