Washington, D.C. 20549
(Mark one) |
|
|
|
ý |
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
|
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 |
|
|
OR |
|
|
|
o |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission File No. 0-23911
Fog Cutter Capital Group Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Maryland |
52-2081138 |
(State or other
jurisdiction of |
(I.R.S. Employer |
1410 SW Jefferson Street
Portland, OR 97201
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(503) 721-6500
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yesý Noo.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an
accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No ý.
APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Class |
Outstanding at September 30, 2004 |
Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per share |
8,380,673 shares |
FOG CUTTER CAPITAL GROUP INC.
FORM 10-Q
I N D E X
PART IFINANCIAL INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
PART IIOTHER INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
Available information
Our website is www.fccgi.com. We make our annual report on Form 10-K, as well as other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, available free of charge through our website as soon as reasonably practicable after they are filed. A copy of these reports may also be obtained by writing to us at 1410 SW Jefferson Street, Portland, Oregon 97201, Attn: Investor Reporting.
2
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
FOG CUTTER CAPITAL GROUP INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
(dollars in thousands, except share data)
|
|
September 30 |
|
December 31 |
|
||||
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
||||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
7,103 |
|
$ |
19,607 |
|
||
Securities available for sale, pledged under repurchase agreements, at estimated fair value |
|
|
|
35,010 |
|
||||
Securities available for sale, at estimated fair value |
|
10 |
|
500 |
|
||||
Loans held for investment |
|
10,417 |
|
3,744 |
|
||||
Investments in real estate, net |
|
28,009 |
|
22,577 |
|
||||
Loans to senior executives |
|
2,975 |
|
2,964 |
|
||||
Investment in Bourne End |
|
1,969 |
|
2,141 |
|
||||
Restaurant property, plant and equipment, net |
|
6,036 |
|
5,897 |
|
||||
Intangible assets, net |
|
5,456 |
|
5,640 |
|
||||
Goodwill |
|
7,541 |
|
7,300 |
|
||||
Other assets |
|
3,960 |
|
3,596 |
|
||||
Total assets |
|
$ |
73,476 |
|
$ |
108,976 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Repurchase agreements |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
25,318 |
|
||
Borrowings and notes payable |
|
7,699 |
|
7,804 |
|
||||
Obligations under capital leases |
|
12,684 |
|
12,942 |
|
||||
Obligation under leave of absence agreement |
|
2,358 |
|
|
|
||||
Dividends payable |
|
41 |
|
1,216 |
|
||||
Deferred income |
|
4,426 |
|
3,700 |
|
||||
Deferred income taxes |
|
5,880 |
|
6,980 |
|
||||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
6,018 |
|
5,635 |
|
||||
Total liabilities |
|
39,106 |
|
63,595 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Stockholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Preferred stock, $.0001 par value; 25,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Common stock, $.0001 par value; 200,000,000 shares authorized; 11,757,073 shares issued as of September 30, 2004 and 11,716,600 shares issued as of December 31, 2003; 8,380,673 shares outstanding as of September 30, 2004 and 8,670,700 shares outstanding as of December 31, 2003 |
|
168,191 |
|
168,018 |
|
||||
Accumulated deficit |
|
(123,776 |
) |
(115,588 |
) |
||||
Option to purchase common stock |
|
(592 |
) |
|
|
||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
274 |
|
968 |
|
||||
Treasury stock; 3,376,400 common shares as of September 30, 2004, and 3,045,900 common shares as of December 31, 2003, at cost |
|
(9,727 |
) |
(8,017 |
) |
||||
Total stockholders equity |
|
34,370 |
|
45,381 |
|
||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
73,476 |
|
$ |
108,976 |
|
||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
3
FOG CUTTER CAPITAL GROUP INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except share data)
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
Nine months Ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||||
Net Interest Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Loans |
|
$ |
456 |
|
$ |
534 |
|
$ |
1,431 |
|
$ |
850 |
|
Loans to senior executives |
|
51 |
|
54 |
|
138 |
|
162 |
|
||||
Securities |
|
11 |
|
509 |
|
616 |
|
1,983 |
|
||||
Other investments |
|
14 |
|
36 |
|
85 |
|
127 |
|
||||
Total interest income |
|
532 |
|
1,133 |
|
2,270 |
|
3,122 |
|
||||
Interest expense |
|
|
|
160 |
|
112 |
|
578 |
|
||||
Net interest income |
|
532 |
|
973 |
|
2,158 |
|
2,544 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Real Estate Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Operating income |
|
1,106 |
|
1,034 |
|
3,083 |
|
2,965 |
|
||||
Gain on sale of real estate |
|
154 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
279 |
|
||||
Operating expense |
|
(454 |
) |
(498 |
) |
(1,330 |
) |
(1,564 |
) |
||||
Interest expense |
|
(281 |
) |
(320 |
) |
(843 |
) |
(1,040 |
) |
||||
Depreciation |
|
(166 |
) |
(155 |
) |
(489 |
) |
(461 |
) |
||||
Total real estate operations |
|
359 |
|
61 |
|
580 |
|
179 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Restaurant Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Operating revenue |
|
5,673 |
|
2,472 |
|
16,424 |
|
2,472 |
|
||||
Cost of goods sold |
|
(3,274 |
) |
(1,515 |
) |
(9,812 |
) |
(1,515 |
) |
||||
Franchise and royalty fee |
|
349 |
|
152 |
|
998 |
|
152 |
|
||||
General and administrative cost |
|
(2,530 |
) |
(901 |
) |
(7,946 |
) |
(901 |
) |
||||
Interest expense |
|
(97 |
) |
(112 |
) |
(442 |
) |
(112 |
) |
||||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
(377 |
) |
(141 |
) |
(1,121 |
) |
(141 |
) |
||||
Total restaurant operations |
|
(256 |
) |
(45 |
) |
(1,899 |
) |
(45 |
) |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Other Operating Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Gain on sale of loans and securities |
|
|
|
1,289 |
|
2,099 |
|
10,672 |
|
||||
Gain on sale of prepaid servicing credit |
|
|
|
|
|
1,530 |
|
|
|
||||
Equity in income of equity investees |
|
2,719 |
|
500 |
|
4,231 |
|
1,370 |
|
||||
Loan brokerage fees |
|
1,839 |
|
1,244 |
|
4,213 |
|
3,497 |
|
||||
Other revenue |
|
476 |
|
725 |
|
1,349 |
|
1,318 |
|
||||
Total other operating income |
|
5,034 |
|
3,758 |
|
13,422 |
|
16,857 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Operating Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Compensation and employee benefits |
|
2,443 |
|
2,283 |
|
7,966 |
|
8,101 |
|
||||
Leave of absence expense |
|
|
|
|
|
4,750 |
|
|
|
||||
Professional fees |
|
794 |
|
444 |
|
1,963 |
|
1,539 |
|
||||
Fees paid to related parties |
|
141 |
|
121 |
|
365 |
|
391 |
|
||||
Other |
|
1,400 |
|
795 |
|
4,099 |
|
2,444 |
|
||||
Total operating expenses |
|
4,778 |
|
3,643 |
|
19,143 |
|
12,475 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net income before provision for income taxes |
|
891 |
|
1,104 |
|
(4,882 |
) |
7,060 |
|
||||
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
550 |
|
|
|
2,260 |
|
||||
Net Income |
|
$ |
891 |
|
$ |
554 |
|
$ |
(4,882 |
) |
$ |
4,800 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
4
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
Nine months Ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||||
Basic net income (loss) per share |
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
$ |
(0.57 |
) |
$ |
0.56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Basic weighted average shares outstanding |
|
8,380,173 |
|
8,670,575 |
|
8,490,376 |
|
8,585,550 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Diluted net income (loss) per share |
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
$ |
(0.57 |
) |
$ |
0.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding |
|
8,385,146 |
|
9,746,241 |
|
8,490,376 |
|
9,661,216 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Dividends declared per share |
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
5
FOG CUTTER CAPITAL GROUP INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
Common Stock |
|
Treasury Stock |
|
Subject to Options |
|
Accumulated |
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
Shares (1) |
|
Amount |
|
Shares |
|
Amount |
|
Amount |
|
Deficit |
|
Income |
|
Total |
|
||||||
Balance at January 1, 2004 |
|
8,670,700 |
|
$ |
168,018 |
|
3,045,900 |
|
$ |
(8,017 |
) |
$ |
|
|
$ |
(115,588 |
) |
$ |
968 |
|
$ |
45,381 |
|
Comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,882 |
) |
|
|
(4,882 |
) |
||||||
Other comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97 |
|
97 |
|
||||||
Unrealized holding gains on securities available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,362 |
|
1,362 |
|
||||||
Reclassification adjustment for gains on securities and foreign currency translation included in net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,153 |
) |
(2,153 |
) |
||||||
Total comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,576 |
) |
||||||
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
(330,500 |
) |
|
|
330,500 |
|
(1,710 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,710 |
) |
||||||
Common stock issued pursuant to exercise of stock options |
|
40,473 |
|
173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
173 |
|
||||||
Dividends declared |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,306 |
) |
|
|
(3,306 |
) |
||||||
Purchase of call options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(592 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(592 |
) |
||||||
Balance at September 30, 2004 |
|
8,380,673 |
|
$ |
168,191 |
|
3,376,400 |
|
$ |
(9,727 |
) |
$ |
(592 |
) |
$ |
(123,776 |
) |
$ |
274 |
|
$ |
34,370 |
|
(1) Issued and outstanding
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
6
FOG CUTTER CAPITAL GROUP INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
Nine months Ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
891 |
|
$ |
554 |
|
$ |
(4,882 |
) |
$ |
4,800 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
509 |
|
241 |
|
1,611 |
|
613 |
|
||||
Gain on foreign currency translation |
|
(31 |
) |
(491 |
) |
(51 |
) |
(728 |
) |
||||
Gain on sale of securities and loans |
|
|
|
(1,289 |
) |
(2,099 |
) |
(10,672 |
) |
||||
Gain on sale of real estate |
|
(154 |
) |
|
|
(159 |
) |
|
|
||||
Gain on sale of prepaid servicing credit |
|
|
|
|
|
(1,530 |
) |
|
|
||||
Equity in income of equity investees |
|
(2,719 |
) |
(500 |
) |
(4,231 |
) |
(1,370 |
) |
||||
Other |
|
(237 |
) |
32 |
|
(882 |
) |
(253 |
) |
||||
Change in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Deferred income |
|
417 |
|
980 |
|
726 |
|
980 |
|
||||
Accrued interest receivable |
|
16 |
|
(19 |
) |
64 |
|
57 |
|
||||
Other assets |
|
1,657 |
|
(325 |
) |
456 |
|
333 |
|
||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
(436 |
) |
(266 |
) |
2,616 |
|
946 |
|
||||
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
(87 |
) |
(1,083 |
) |
(8,361 |
) |
(5,294 |
) |
||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Repayments of securities available for sale |
|
|
|
7,178 |
|
6,818 |
|
14,486 |
|
||||
Investment in real estate |
|
(799 |
) |
(1,987 |
) |
(2,433 |
) |
(1,987 |
) |
||||
Investment in variable interest entity |
|
(1,601 |
) |
|
|
(2,229 |
) |
|
|
||||
Proceeds from sale of securities available for sale |
|
|
|
1,844 |
|
29,090 |
|
13,835 |
|
||||
Purchase of loans and discounted loans |
|
(935 |
) |
|
|
(8,008 |
) |
(1,486 |
) |
||||
Principal repayments on loans and discounted loans |
|
115 |
|
289 |
|
1,169 |
|
782 |
|
||||
Proceeds from sale of real estate |
|
362 |
|
|
|
536 |
|
|
|
||||
Proceeds from sale of prepaid servicing credit |
|
|
|
|
|
1,530 |
|
|
|
||||
Investment in and loans to equity investees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,000 |
) |
||||
Payments made in connection with the acquisition of subsidiary, net of cash acquired |
|
|
|
(4,965 |
) |
|
|
(4,965 |
) |
||||
Proceeds from investments in and loans to equity investees |
|
4,429 |
|
3,042 |
|
4,429 |
|
5,942 |
|
||||
Purchase of restaurant property plant and equipment |
|
(293 |
) |
|
|
(1,077 |
) |
|
|
||||
Other |
|
(9 |
) |
54 |
|
18 |
|
(194 |
) |
||||
Net cash provided by investing activities |
|
1,269 |
|
5,455 |
|
29,843 |
|
23,413 |
|
||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Repayments under capital leases |
|
(117 |
) |
(2,891 |
) |
(378 |
) |
(3,184 |
) |
||||
Repayments on borrowings |
|
(1,324 |
) |
(953 |
) |
(27,136 |
) |
(9,173 |
) |
||||
Payment of obligation to purchase treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,399 |
) |
||||
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
9 |
|
2 |
|
173 |
|
877 |
|
||||
Investment in option to purchase stock |
|
|
|
|
|
(592 |
) |
|
|
||||
Investment in treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
(1,710 |
) |
|
|
||||
Dividend payments on common stock |
|
(1,080 |
) |
(1,127 |
) |
(4,480 |
) |
(4,610 |
) |
||||
Other |
|
197 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
(2,315 |
) |
(4,969 |
) |
(34,002 |
) |
(17,489 |
) |
||||
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH |
|
(1 |
) |
2 |
|
16 |
|
(3 |
) |
||||
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
(1,134 |
) |
(595 |
) |
(12,504 |
) |
627 |
|
||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD |
|
8,237 |
|
15,727 |
|
19,607 |
|
14,505 |
|
||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD |
|
$ |
7,103 |
|
$ |
15,132 |
|
$ |
7,103 |
|
$ |
15,132 |
|
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Cash paid for interest |
|
$ |
380 |
|
$ |
523 |
|
$ |
1,355 |
|
$ |
1,722 |
|
Notes payable issued to settle obligation to purchase treasury stock |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
331 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
3,131 |
|
Cash paid for income taxes |
|
$ |
71 |
|
$ |
232 |
|
$ |
203 |
|
$ |
361 |
|
Non-cash assets acquired |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
19,502 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
19,502 |
|
Non-cash liabilities assumed |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
14,537 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
14,537 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
7
FOG CUTTER CAPITAL GROUP INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTE 1 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying interim consolidated financial statements of Fog Cutter Capital Group Inc. and Subsidiaries (FCCG or the Company) are unaudited and have been prepared in conformity with the requirements of Regulation S-X promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), particularly Rule 10-01 thereof, which governs the presentation of interim financial statements. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements. The accompanying interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Companys 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K/A. A summary of the Companys significant accounting policies is set forth in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements in the 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K/A.
In the Companys opinion, all adjustments, comprised of normal recurring accruals necessary for the fair presentation of the interim financial statements, have been included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. Operating results for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2004.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Certain items in the previously reported consolidated financial statements were reclassified to conform to the September 30, 2004 presentation, none of which affected previously reported results of operations.
At September 30, 2004, certain Company officers and directors had, directly or indirectly, majority voting control of the Company.
NOTE 2 - SIGNIFICANT TRANSACTIONS
Fatburger Holdings, Inc.
On August 15, 2003, the Company acquired a controlling interest in Fatburger Holdings, Inc. (Fatburger), and began reporting the operations of Fatburger on a consolidated basis as of that date. Fatburger operates or franchises 60 hamburger restaurants located in California, Nevada, Arizona, New Jersey, Colorado, Florida and Washington. Franchisees currently own and operate 35 of the Fatburger locations and Fatburger has agreements for approximately 240 new franchise restaurants. The terms of the original acquisition by the Company were amended on January 12, 2004 and May 12, 2004. Initially, the Company made a $5.4 million investment and acquired approximately 83% of the voting control of Fatburger. However, all but 15% of the ownership investment was redeemable by Fatburger. On May 12, 2004, the Company contributed an additional $3.0 million, bringing its total investment to $8.4 million. As a result of this transaction, the Companys voting control of Fatburger was reduced to approximately 71%, but the Company retained a non-redeemable, fully diluted 47% ownership interest in Fatburger. The Companys investment consists of the purchase of convertible preferred stock (the Series A Preferred) and redeemable preferred stock (the Series D Preferred).
The Series A Preferred is convertible into a 50% ownership interest of the common stock of Fatburger on a fully diluted basis. The Company owns approximately 93% of the issued and outstanding Series A Preferred, and currently holds voting rights equal to 71% of the voting control of Fatburger. The Series A Preferred is not redeemable and does not pay dividends.
The Series D Preferred has a liquidation preference and is redeemable by Fatburger for $10.1 million plus accrued but unpaid dividends. Dividends accrue at a rate of 20% of the redemption value,
8
compounded annually. The Series D Preferred does not have any voting rights. The Company owns all of the issued and outstanding Series D Preferred.
Mortgage-Backed Securities
During the nine months ended September 30, 2004, the Company sold four mortgage-backed securities for $29.1 million in cash. As a result of these transactions, the Company recognized gains on the sale of securities of $2.1 million in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations. As of September 30, 2004, the Companys investment in mortgage-backed securities had decreased to less than $0.1 million.
Loans
During the nine months ended September 30, 2004, the Company purchased or funded four loans secured by real estate for a total of $8.0 million. The current yield to the Company on these loans is approximately 17.6%.
Dividends
The Company has declared and paid a $0.13 per share dividend for each quarter of 2004. The first quarter dividend was paid on March 1, 2004 to stockholders of record on February 20, 2004. The second quarter dividend was paid on June 1, 2004 to stockholders of record on May 21, 2004. The third quarter dividend was paid on September 1, 2004 to stockholders of record on August 18, 2004. On October 20, 2004, the Company announced the declaration of a $0.13 per share fourth quarter dividend, payable on November 15, 2004 to stockholders of record on November 1, 2004.
Call Option
On April 26, 2004, the Company purchased a three year call option (the Call Option) from Andrew A. Wiederhorn. At the time, Mr. Wiederhorn was the Companys Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. Currently, Mr. Wiederhorn is a director and Chief Strategic Officer under a leave of absence agreement. The Call Option gives the Company the right, but not the obligation, to purchase 423,245 of the Companys outstanding common stock (the Option Shares) from Mr. Wiederhorn for a purchase price of $3.99 per share. The option may be exercised at any time during the three year option period. The Company paid $750,000 ($1.77 per option share) for the Call Option. The premium paid for the Call Option, together with the strike price, represented a premium to the Companys book value per share and market price per share at the time the option was purchased. In purchasing the Call Option, the Company and its directors considered the following factors: (1) the potentially negative impact on the Companys share price if the Option Shares were disposed of publicly; (2) the Companys favorable liquidity position; (3) the potential reduction in the risk that shares are transferred in a transaction which would have an adverse impact on its NOL position; and (4) the reduction in the future expenditure of cash dividends by the Company once the Company exercises the Call Option. The Board of Directors reviewed and approved the transaction to confirm that the transaction was in the best interest of the Company and its other stockholders. As a result of the purchase of the Call Option, the Company recorded a direct reduction to stockholders equity of $592,000 and compensation expense of $158,000.
Treasury Stock Purchase
On April 28, 2004, the Company purchased 330,500 shares of its common stock from Clarence B. Coleman, who at the time was a greater than 10% shareholder. The purchase price was $5.40 per share ($1.8 million) and the shares were added to treasury stock. At the time, the purchase price represented a small premium to the Companys book value per share and market price per share. The Company and its directors considered the following factors: (1) the potentially negative impact on the Companys share price if the shares were disposed of publicly; (2) the Companys favorable liquidity position; (3) the potential reduction in the risk that shares are transferred in a transaction which would have an adverse impact on its NOL position; and (4) the reduction in the future expenditure of cash dividends by the Company. The Board of Directors reviewed and approved the transaction to confirm that the transaction was in the best interest of the Company
9
and its other stockholders. As a result of this transaction, the Company recorded treasury stock of $1.7 million and a charge to earnings of $0.1 million.
Leave of Absence Agreement
As the Company has previously disclosed, the Companys former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Andrew Wiederhorn, and former President, Lawrence Mendelsohn, received letters from the United States Attorneys Office for the District of Oregon (USAODO) in March 2001 advising them that they were targets of a grand jury investigation (the CCL Investigation) into the failure of Capital Consultants, L.L.C (CCL).
In August 2002, Mr. Mendelsohn resigned as President and Director of the Company. In November 2003, Mr. Mendelsohn entered into an agreement with the USAODO pursuant to which he plead guilty to filing a false 1998 personal tax return and agreed to cooperate in the CCL Investigation.
On June 3, 2004, the Company announced that Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board Andrew Wiederhorn had entered into a settlement with the USAODO regarding its investigation into CCL (the Settlement) and would take a leave of absence from his corporate positions at FCCG. Under the Settlements terms, Mr. Wiederhorn pled guilty on June 3, 2004 to two federal counts and was sentenced to 18-months incarceration and fined $2.0 million. The charges to which Mr. Wiederhorn has pled guilty pursuant to the Settlement are not based upon any acts or omission to the Company or of Mr. Wiederhorn in his capacity as an officer or director of the Company.
On June 2, 2004, the Company and Mr. Wiederhorn entered into a leave of absence agreement. In entering into Mr. Wiederhorns leave of absence agreement, the Board of Directors considered the nature of the statutes to which Mr. Wiederhorn pled and the fact that he relied on the advice of expert legal counsel and a national accounting firm. The Board also believed it was important to assure Mr. Wiederhorns return to active involvement with the Company because of his expertise and knowledge and to preserve a significant business relationship and the value of the Companys investments.
Mr. Wiederhorn is currently a director and Chief Strategic Officer of the Company. Under the terms of the leave of absence agreement, Mr. Wiederhorn will continue to receive his regular salary and bonus pursuant to and as set forth in his employment agreement. In addition, for the reasons stated in the agreement, the Company made a leave of absence payment to Mr. Wiederhorn in the amount of $2.0 million on June, 2, 2004.
Mr. Wiederhorn began his leave of absence on August 2, 2004 and is expected to remain in that status for a period of 14 to 18 months. The accompanying consolidated financial statements reflect a charge to earnings of $4.8 million for the nine month period ending September 30, 2004. This is comprised of the $2.0 million payment made on June 2, 2004 and the accrual of the expected salary and bonus relating to the leave of absence period.
Change in Auditor
On July 16, 2004, Ernst & Young LLP advised the Company that the firm would resign as the Companys auditors upon completion of its review of the interim financial information for the second quarter of 2004 and filing of the Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2004. The resignation was not the result of disagreements with Ernst & Young LLP on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure. On September 7, 2004, the Company appointed UHY LLP as its independent auditor. The decision to appoint UHY LLP was approved by the Audit Committee and the Board of Directors.
10
Nasdaq Delisting
Effective October 14, 2004, the Companys Common Stock began trading in the over-the-counter (OTC) market on the OTC pink sheets. Prior to that, the Companys Common Stock was quoted on the Nasdaq National Market. On July 20, 2004, the Company was notified by Nasdaq of a staff determination to delist the Companys Common Stock effective July 29, 2004. The Company challenged the staff determination and requested an oral hearing by a Listing Qualifications Panel to review the staffs conclusions. A hearing was held on September 9, 2004 and, on October 12, 2004, the Company was notified by Nasdaq that the Listing Qualifications Panel upheld the staff determination and the Companys Common Stock was delisted from the Nasdaq National Market on October 14, 2004. The Company has requested a review of the Listing Qualifications Panels decision by Nasdaqs Listing and Hearing Review Council. There can be no assurance that the Companys appeal will be successful.
Bourne End
On August 6, 2004, an equity investee of the Company, Bourne End sold its Southend Shopping Center for approximately 28.0 million Great Britain pounds (GBP). The Companys share of the net gain on this transaction was $2.8 million.
George Elkins Mortgage Banking Company
On August 11, 2004 the Company received a notice from the Class B Holders of Fog Cap GEMB Holdings LLC (Holdings), a 51% owned subsidiary of the Company which owns trade names and certain assets relating to the operation of George Elkins Mortgage Banking Company. The notice was to inform the Company that the Class B Holders believe that a Change in Control Transaction (as defined in the Holdings Operating Agreement) has occurred as a result of the leave of absence of Mr. Wiederhorn. The notice also indicates that unless the Change in Control Transaction is corrected within 120 days, the Class B Holders intend to exercise their rights to purchase the Class A Interests held by the Company in accordance with the formula outlined in the Operating Agreement.
The Company disputes the claim that a Change in Control Transaction has occurred as a result of the leave of absence of Mr. Wiederhorn. The Company believes that the market value of its investment is greater than the amount of the buyback formula and intends to vigorously defend against these claims. However, if the Company is unsuccessful in defending this position, an analysis of the economic effect of the buyback formula indicates that the Company would not incur a loss on the transaction. As a result, no reserves are required due to the receipt of the notice.
NOTE 3 COMMITMENTS, CONTINGENCIES & OFF-BALANCE SHEET RISK
CCL Investigation
The Companys former Chief Executive Officer and current Chief Strategic Officer, Andrew Wiederhorn, and former President, Lawrence Mendelsohn, pursuant to the terms of their respective employment agreements, may have been entitled to indemnity from the Company for litigation expenses and personal losses in connection with the CCL investigations and any related litigation. Messrs. Wiederhorn and Mendelsohn had notified the Company that, although they believed they were entitled to primary indemnification from other sources, they were reserving their rights to seek indemnity from the Company. The Company did not agree to any indemnity requests. Mr. Wiederhorn released the Company from any and all claims he may have had relating to the CCL matter as partial consideration for the leave of absence agreement in June 2004. The USAODO has settled the CCL matter as it relates to both Mr. Wiederhorn and Mr. Mendelsohn. As a result, the Company believes that the contingencies relating to the potential indemnification of these officers or former officers have now been resolved.
Strouds Acquisition Corporation
On October 6, 2003, the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Strouds Acquisition Corporation (Strouds) filed a lawsuit in the United States Bankruptcy Court which named the Company,
11
among others, as a defendant. The lawsuit was amended on November 10, 2003 and limited the complaint against the Company solely in its capacity as collateral agent for certain secured creditors of Strouds Acquisition Corporation. The lawsuit, as it pertained to the Company, sought reimbursement of the proceeds from approximately $3.0 million in funds received in October 2003, which the Company was holding as collateral agent for other secured creditors. These funds were not included in the assets of the Company, but were being held in trust. On July 1, 2004, the lawsuit was settled and the Company distributed the trust funds, net of legal reimbursements of $0.3 million, in accordance with the settlement agreement. The Company received a general release from the parties and considers the matter closed.
Shareholder Derivative Complaint
On July 6, 2004, Jeff Allen McCoon, derivatively on behalf of the Company, filed a lawsuit in the Circuit Court for the State of Oregon (Multnomah County) which named the Company and all of its directors as defendants. The lawsuit alleges that members of the Companys Board of Directors breached their duties to the Company by entering into the leave of absence agreement with Andrew Wiederhorn. The lawsuit generally seeks restitution of payments made under the leave of absence agreement plus attorney fees and costs. The individual defendants have indemnity agreements with the Company and have asserted the right to indemnification from the Company under those indemnity agreements. This case is in the very early pleading stages and motions are pending against the complaint. The Company may incur expenses under the indemnity agreements and also may derive benefits if the plaintiffs claims are successful. At this stage of the case, it is too early to predict the outcome with any certainty. The complaint is not specific as to the amount of damages it is seeking against the individual defendants, but it appears to seek at least the return of $2 million paid to Mr. Wiederhorn under the Leave of Absence Agreement.
Other
The Company is involved in various other legal proceedings occurring in the ordinary course of business which the Company believes will not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial condition or operations of the Company.
The Company may utilize a wide variety of off-balance sheet financial techniques to manage its risk. In hedging the interest rate and/or exchange rate exposure of a foreign currency denominated asset or liability, the Company may enter into hedge transactions to counter movements in interest rates and foreign currencies. These hedges may be in the form of currency and interest rate swaps, options, and forwards, or combinations thereof.
At September 30, 2004, the Company had no outstanding derivative instruments held for trading or hedging purposes.
The Company has operating leases for office and retail space which expire through 2012. The leases provide for varying minimum annual rental payments including rent increases and free rent periods.
Future minimum rental payments, by year and in the aggregate, under noncancelable operating leases with initial or remaining terms of one year or more, consisted approximately of the following at September 30, 2004 (dollars in thousands):
2004 |
|
$ |
722 |
|
2005 |
|
2,787 |
|
|
2006 |
|
2,329 |
|
|
2007 |
|
1,808 |
|
|
2008 |
|
1,273 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
3,308 |
|
|
Total minimum lease payments |
|
$ |
12,227 |
|
12
In order to facilitate the development of franchise locations, as of September 30, 2004, Fatburger had guaranteed the annual minimum lease payments of three restaurant sites owned and operated by franchisees. The amount of the guarantees total approximately $1.9 million plus certain contingent rental payments as defined in the respective leases. These leases expire at various times through 2008.
The Company did not have any other off balance sheet arrangements in place as of September 30, 2004.
NOTE 4 - GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Primarily due to the acquisition of Fatburger, the Company has goodwill in the amount of $7.5 million and other intangible assets in the amount of $5.5 million. In accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, goodwill is not amortized, but is subject to an annual impairment test, which is being performed as of August 15, 2004. Since the acquisition of Fatburger by the Company, Fatburger has experienced operating losses and has funded its operations and expansion with limited liquidity. The Company believes that these conditions are temporary in nature, however, should these conditions not be corrected, the Company may be required to recognize impairment losses on its recorded goodwill. As of September 30, 2004, the Company was not aware of any events or changes in circumstances that would require the impairment of the recorded goodwill.
Summarized information for the Companys acquired intangible assets as of September 30, 2004 is as follows (dollars in thousands):
Amortized intangible assets:
Franchise Agreements |
|
$ |
983 |
|
||
Other |
|
503 |
|
|||
Total amortized intangible assets |
|
$ |
1,486 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|||
Unamortized intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|||
Trademarks |
|
$ |
3,970 |
|
||
Trademarks, which have indefinite lives, are not subject to amortization. All other intangible assets are amortized using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets of five to fifteen years. Estimated amortization expense for the remainder of 2004 and the five succeeding years is as follows (dollars in thousands):
2004 |
|
$ |
60 |
|
2005 |
|
241 |
|
|
2006 |
|
239 |
|
|
2007 |
|
236 |
|
|
2008 |
|
236 |
|
|
2009 |
|
236 |
|
The recorded values of goodwill and other intangible assets may become impaired in the future. The determination of the value of such intangible assets requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the consolidated financial statements. Potential impairments to intangible assets are assessed when there is evidence that events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recovered. This assessment is based on the operational performance of acquired businesses, market conditions and other factors including future events. Any resulting impairment loss could have an adverse impact on the results of operations of the Company.
13
NOTE 5 RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
In December 2003, the Accounting Standards Executive Committee (AcSEC) issued Statement of Position 03-3 (SOP 03-3), Accounting for Certain Loans or Debt Securities Acquired in a Transfer. SOP 03-3 requires that the excess of contractual cash flows over cash flows expected to be collected not be recognized as an adjustment of yield, loss accrual, or valuation allowance. Subsequent increases in cash flows expected to be collected generally should be recognized prospectively through adjustment of the loans yield over its remaining life and decreases in cash flows expected to be collected should be recognized as impairment. SOP 03-3 is effective for loans acquired in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2004 and is not expected to have a material effect on the Companys consolidated financial position or results of operations
In March 2004, the FASB issued an exposure draft, Share-Based Payment - An Amendment to FASB Statements No. 123 and 95, which changes the requirements of stock option accounting. The exposure draft requires expense recognition of stock options and certain employee stock purchase plans in the statement of operations. A final standard is expected to be effective relative to the Company during the year ending December 31, 2005. Such stock option expensing would require the Company to value its employee stock option grants pursuant to an option valuation formula and then amortize that value against its earnings over the vesting period in effect for those options. The Company currently accounts for stock-based awards to employees in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and have adopted the disclosure-only alternative of FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. If the Company is required to expense employee stock options in the future, the change in accounting treatment may adversely affect the Companys future reported results of operations.
NOTE 6 STOCK OPTIONS AND RIGHTS
The Company has adopted a non-qualified stock option plan (the Option Plan) which provides for options to purchase shares of the Companys common stock. The maximum number of shares of common stock that may be issued pursuant to options granted under the Option Plan is 3,500,000 shares.
The Company applies Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations in accounting for the Option Plan. Accordingly, no compensation expense has been recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for grants under the Option Plan. Had compensation expense for the Companys Option Plan been determined based on the fair value at the grant date consistent with the methods of FASB Statement No. 123 Accounting for Stock Based Compensation, the Companys net income and income per share for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 would have been decreased to the pro forma amounts indicated below:
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||
|
|
(dollars in thousands, except share data) |
|
||||
Net income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
||
As reported |
|
$ |
(4,882 |
) |
$ |
4,800 |
|
Pro forma compensation expense from stock based compensation, net of tax |
|
(278 |
) |
(29 |
) |
||
Pro forma net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(5,160 |
) |
$ |
4,771 |
|
Net income (loss) per common and common share equivalent: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Basic income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
As reported |
|
$ |
(0.58 |
) |
$ |
0.56 |
|
Pro forma |
|
$ |
(0.61 |
) |
$ |
0.55 |
|
Diluted income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
As reported |
|
$ |
(0.58 |
) |
$ |
0.50 |
|
Pro forma |
|
$ |
(0.61 |
) |
$ |
0.49 |
|
14
There were no options granted with exercise prices below the market value of the stock at the grant date. Fair values for 2004 were estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions used: 10% dividend yield, expected volatility of 86%, risk-free interest rate of 2.5% and expected lives of five years.
NOTE 7 VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES
During the nine months ended September 30, 2004, the Company funded $2.3 million to two related Spanish entities formed to purchase, reposition and sell two apartment buildings in Barcelona, Spain. Under the terms of the loan, the Company receives a preferred 30% return on its investment plus an 80% share in additional profits generated by the investment. The investment meets the definition of a Variable Interest Entity (VIE) under FASB Interpretation 46 (FIN 46) and the Company is the primary beneficiary of the VIE. As a result, the assets and liabilities of the VIE have been consolidated into the accompanying consolidated financial statements as of September 30, 2004.
The VIE purchased the apartment buildings for $4.2 million. The purchase was funded with bank loans totaling $1.4 million, the Companys $2.3 million investment and a $0.4 million contribution from the project managers. Neither the creditors nor the other beneficial interest holders have recourse to the Company with regard to this investment and, as a result, the maximum limit of the Companys exposure to loss on this investment is $2.3 million.
As of September 30, 2004, the following assets and liabilities of the VIE were included in the accompanying consolidated statements of financial condition:
Investment in real estate, net |
|
$ |
4,198,000 |
|
Other assets |
|
21,000 |
|
|
Borrowings and notes payable |
|
1,467,000 |
|
|
Accrued expense and other liabilities |
|
129,000 |
|
|
Minority interest |
|
406,000 |
|
NOTE 8 OPERATING SEGMENTS
The Companys operating segments consist of (i) restaurant operations conducted through Fatburger Holdings, Inc. (Fatburger), (ii) commercial real estate mortgage brokerage activities conducted through George Elkins Mortgage Banking Company (George Elkins) and (iii) real estate, merchant banking and financing activities. The following is a summary of each of the operating segments:
Restaurant Operations
Fatburger operates or franchises 60 hamburger restaurants located in California, Nevada, Arizona, New Jersey, Florida, Colorado and Washington. The Company provided an investment and financing package for Fatburger which involved the acquisition of the 93% of the entire class of the Series A Preferred and the entire class of the Series D Preferred stock of Fatburger. Currently, the Company owns approximately 71% of the voting control of Fatburger. Fatburger has plans to open additional restaurants including expansion into Oregon, Louisiana, Georgia, New York, Ohio, Texas, Missouri, Kansas, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Washington D.C., British Columbia, Minnesota and Michigan. Franchisees currently own and operate about 35 of the Fatburger locations.
Revenue from the operation of Fatburger company-owned restaurants is recognized when sales occur. Franchise fee revenue from the sale of individual Fatburger franchises is recognized only when all material services or conditions relating to the sales have been substantially performed or satisfied. The completion of training and the opening of a location by the franchisee constitute substantial performance on the part of Fatburger. Nonrefundable deposits collected in relation to the sale of franchises are recorded as deferred franchise fees until the completion of training and the opening of the restaurant, at which time the franchise fee revenue is recognized. In addition to franchise fee revenue, Fatburger collects a royalty
15
ranging from 5% to 6% of gross sales from restaurants operated by franchisees. Fatburger recognizes royalty fees as the related sales are made by the franchisees. Costs relating to continuing franchise support are expensed as incurred.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2004, thirty-one individual Fatburger franchises were sold. Five new restaurants were opened during the period, including two company-owned locations. Royalty revenues were approximately $0.3 million and $0.9 million, respectively, for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2004.
Commercial Real Estate Mortgage Brokerage Operations
In May 2002, the Company purchased a 51% ownership interest in George Elkins, a California mortgage banking operation, which, in 2003, provided brokerage services related to the production of over $600 million in commercial real estate mortgages. George Elkins is headquartered in Los Angeles, with satellite offices located throughout the southern California area. As of September 30, 2004, the mortgage brokerage operation also manages a commercial loan servicing portfolio in excess of $700 million for various investors. The Company earned mortgage servicing fees of $0.5 million during both the nine month periods ended September 30, 2004 and September 30, 2003, which are included in other revenue in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
Real Estate, Merchant Banking and Financing Operations
The Company invests in or finances real estate, mortgage-backed securities and other real estate related or finance related assets. The merchant banking and financing operations focus on the acquisition of controlling interests in businesses in the process of restructuring. This can take the form of assisting in a management buy-out, refinancing corporate debt or acquiring the non-core assets of a business.
16
Segment data for the nine months ended September 30, 2004, and 2003 are as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
Merchant Banking, |
|
Mortgage Brokerage |
|
Restaurant |
|
Total |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||||||||
Net Interest Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Loans |
|
$ |
1,431 |
|
$ |
850 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
1,431 |
|
$ |
850 |
|
Loans to senior executives |
|
138 |
|
162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
138 |
|
162 |
|
||||||||
Securities |
|
616 |
|
1,983 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
616 |
|
1,983 |
|
||||||||
Other investments |
|
83 |
|
125 |
|
2 |
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
85 |
|
127 |
|
||||||||
Total interest income |
|
2,268 |
|
3,120 |
|
2 |
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,270 |
|
3,122 |
|
||||||||
Interest expense |
|
112 |
|
578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112 |
|
578 |
|
||||||||
Net interest income |
|
2,156 |
|
2,542 |
|
2 |
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,158 |
|
2,544 |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Real estate operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Operating revenue |
|
3,083 |
|
2,965 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,083 |
|
2,965 |
|
||||||||
Operating expense |
|
(1,330 |
) |
(1,564 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,330 |
) |
(1,564 |
) |
||||||||
Gain on sale of real estate |
|
159 |
|
279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
159 |
|
279 |
|
||||||||
Interest expense |
|
(843 |
) |
(1,040 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(843 |
) |
(1,040 |
) |
||||||||
Depreciation |
|
(489 |
) |
(461 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(489 |
) |
(461 |
) |
||||||||
Total real estate operations |
|
580 |
|
179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
580 |
|
179 |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Restaurant operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Operating income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,424 |
|
2,472 |
|
16,424 |
|
2,472 |
|
||||||||
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,812 |
) |
(1,515 |
) |
(9,812 |
) |
(1,515 |
) |
||||||||
Franchise and royalty fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
998 |
|
152 |
|
998 |
|
152 |
|
||||||||
General and administrative costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,946 |
) |
(901 |
) |
(7,946 |
) |
(901 |
) |
||||||||
Interest Expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(442 |
) |
(112 |
) |
(442 |
) |
(112 |
) |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,121 |
) |
(141 |
) |
(1,121 |
) |
(141 |
) |
||||||||
Total restaurant operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,899 |
) |
(45 |
) |
(1,899 |
) |
(45 |
) |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Other operating income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Market valuations loss / impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Gain on sale of prepaid servicing credit |
|
1,530 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,530 |
|
|
|
||||||||
Equity in income of equity investees |
|
4,231 |
|
1,370 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,231 |
|
1,370 |
|
||||||||
Gain on sale of loans and securities |
|
2,099 |
|
10,672 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,099 |
|
10,672 |
|
||||||||
Loan origination fees |
|
|
|
|
|
4,213 |
|
3,497 |
|
|
|
|
|
4,213 |
|
3,497 |
|
||||||||
Other revenue |
|
1,088 |
|
951 |
|
261 |
|
367 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,349 |
|
1,318 |
|
||||||||
Total other operating income |
|
8,948 |
|
12,993 |
|
4,474 |
|
3,864 |
|
|
|
|
|
13,422 |
|
16,857 |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Compensation and employee benefits |
|
4,185 |
|
4,908 |
|
3,781 |
|
3,193 |
|
|
|
|
|
7,966 |
|
8,101 |
|
||||||||
Leave of absence expense |
|
4,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,750 |
|
|
|
||||||||
Professional fees |
|
1,934 |
|
1,415 |
|
29 |
|
124 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,963 |
|
1,539 |
|
||||||||
Fees paid to related parties |
|
365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
365 |
|
|
|
||||||||
Other |
|
3,442 |
|
2,198 |
|
657 |
|
637 |
|
|
|
|
|
4,099 |
|
2,835 |
|
||||||||
Total operating expenses |
|
14,676 |
|
8,521 |
|
4,467 |
|
3,954 |
|
|
|
|
|
19,143 |
|
12,475 |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Net income (loss) before provisions |
|
(2,992 |
) |
7,193 |
|
9 |
|
(88 |
) |
(1,899 |
) |
(45 |
) |
(4,882 |
) |
7,060 |
|
||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
2,152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
2,260 |
|
||||||||
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(2,992 |
) |
$ |
5,041 |
|
$ |
9 |
|
$ |
(88 |
) |
$ |
(1,899 |
) |
$ |
(153 |
) |
$ |
(4,882 |
) |
$ |
4,800 |
|
Segment assets |
|
$ |
51,204 |
|
$ |
91,557 |
|
$ |
1,778 |
|
$ |
2,989 |
|
$ |
20,494 |
|
$ |
20,260 |
|
$ |
73,476 |
|
$ |
114,806 |
|
17
Segment data for the three months ended September 30, 2004, and 2003 are as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
Merchant Banking, |
|
Mortgage Brokerage |
|
Restaurant |
|
Total |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||||||||
Net Interest Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Loans |
|
$ |
456 |
|
$ |
534 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
456 |
|
$ |
588 |
|
Loans to senior executives |
|
51 |
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
||||||||
Securities |
|
11 |
|
509 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
509 |
|
||||||||
Other investments |
|
13 |
|
35 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
36 |
|
||||||||
Total interest income |
|
531 |
|
1,132 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
532 |
|
1,133 |
|
||||||||
Interest expense |
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160 |
|
||||||||
Net interest income |
|
531 |
|
972 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
532 |
|
973 |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Real estate operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Operating income |
|
1,106 |
|
1,034 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,106 |
|
1,034 |
|
||||||||
Gain on sale of real estate |
|
154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
||||||||
Operating expense |
|
(454 |
) |
(498 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(454 |
) |
(498 |
) |
||||||||
Interest expense |
|
(281 |
) |
(320 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(281 |
) |
(320 |
) |
||||||||
Depreciation |
|
(166 |
) |
(155 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(166 |
) |
(155 |
) |
||||||||
Total real estate operations |
|
359 |
|
61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
359 |
|
61 |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Restaurant operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Operating revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,673 |
|
2,472 |
|
5,673 |
|
2,472 |
|
||||||||
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,274 |
) |
(1,515 |
) |
(3,274 |
) |
(1,515 |
) |
||||||||
Franchise and royalty fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
349 |
|
152 |
|
349 |
|
152 |
|
||||||||
General and administrative costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,530 |
) |
(901 |
) |
(2,530 |
) |
(901 |
) |
||||||||
Interest Expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(97 |
) |
(112 |
) |
(97 |
) |
(112 |
) |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(377 |
) |
(141 |
) |
(377 |
) |
(141 |
) |
||||||||
Total restaurant operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(256 |
) |
(45 |
) |
(256 |
) |
(45 |
) |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Other operating income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Market valuations loss / impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Gain on sale of prepaid servicing credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Equity in income of equity investees |
|
2,719 |
|
500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,719 |
|
500 |
|
||||||||
Gain on sale of loans and securities |
|
|
|
1,289 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,289 |
|
||||||||
Loan origination fees |
|
|
|
|
|
1,839 |
|
1,244 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,839 |
|
1,244 |
|
||||||||
Other revenue |
|
462 |
|
602 |
|
14 |
|
123 |
|
|
|
|
|
476 |
|
725 |
|
||||||||
Total other operating income |
|
3,181 |
|
2,391 |
|
1,853 |
|
1,367 |
|
|
|
|
|
5,034 |
|
3,758 |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Compensation and employee benefits |
|
907 |
|
1,203 |
|
1,536 |
|
1,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,443 |
|
2,283 |
|
||||||||
Leave of absence expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Professional fees |
|
779 |
|
365 |
|
15 |
|
79 |
|
|
|
|
|
794 |
|
444 |
|
||||||||
Fees paid to related parties |
|
141 |
|
121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141 |
|
121 |
|
||||||||
Other |
|
1,168 |
|
542 |
|
232 |
|
253 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,400 |
|
795 |
|
||||||||
Total operating expenses |
|
2,995 |
|
2,231 |
|
1,783 |
|
1,412 |
|
|
|
|
|
4778 |
|
3,643 |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Net income (loss) before provisions |
|
1,076 |
|
1,193 |
|
71 |
|
(44 |
) |
(256 |
) |
(45 |
) |
891 |
|
1,104 |
|
||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
550 |
|
||||||||
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
1,076 |
|
$ |
751 |
|
$ |
71 |
|
$ |
(44 |
) |
$ |
(256 |
) |
$ |
(153 |
) |
$ |
891 |
|
$ |
554 |
|
Segment assets |
|
$ |
51,204 |
|
$ |
91,557 |
|
$ |
1,778 |
|
$ |
2,989 |
|
$ |
20,494 |
|
$ |
20,260 |
|
$ |
73,476 |
|
$ |
114,806 |
|
18
NOTE 9 INCOME TAXES
As of September 30, 2004, the Company had, for U.S. Federal tax purposes, a net operating loss (NOL) carry forward of approximately $76.1 million, including $11.5 million relating to Fatburger. The Companys NOL begins to expire in 2018. Fatburgers NOL begins to expire in 2004 and is generally subject to an annual limitation under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, Section 382, Limitation on Net Operating Loss Carryovers and Certain Built-In Losses Following Change in Control. In addition, to the extent the Fatburger NOL is utilized, the recognition of the related tax benefits would first reduce goodwill related to the Fatburger acquisition, then other non-current intangible assets related to that acquisition, and then income tax expense in accordance with Statement on Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes.
United States tax regulations impose limitations on the use of NOL carry forwards following certain changes in ownership. If such a change were to occur with respect to the Company, the limitation could significantly reduce the amount of benefits that would be available to offset future taxable income each year, starting with the year of ownership change. To reduce the likelihood of such ownership changes, the Company established a Shareholder Rights Plan dated as of October 18, 2002, which discourages, under certain circumstances, ownership changes which would trigger the NOL limitations.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2004, a provision for income taxes was not required due to the tax net operating loss generated during the period. During the nine months ended September 30, 2003, the Company recognized a provision for income taxes of $2.3 million.
NOTE 10 SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Dividends
On October 20, 2004, the Board of Directors declared a $0.13 per share dividend for the fourth quarter of 2004. The dividend is payable on November 15, 2004 to shareholders of record on November 1, 2004.
Sale of Real Estate
Subsequent to September 30, 2004, the Company sold four stand-alone retail locations for a sales price of $2.3 million. The proceeds from these sales consisted of $1.0 million in cash and a note receivable of $1.3 million. Additionally, during October 2004, the Company received the final $1.1 million payment on a note receivable relating to the sale of real estate during 2000.
The Company is currently under contract to sell four additional free-standing retail locations for a combined sales price of $2.3 million.
19
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the Interim Consolidated Financial Statements of Fog Cutter Capital Group Inc. and the notes thereto included elsewhere in this filing. References in this filing to Fog Cutter Capital Group Inc., we, our, and us refer to Fog Cutter Capital Group Inc. and its subsidiaries unless the context indicates otherwise.
Fog Cutter Capital Group Inc. (FCCG or the Company) focuses on the acquisition of assets where its expertise in intensive asset management and financial structuring can create value.
Our business strategy consists of developing, strengthening and expanding our restaurant and commercial real estate mortgage brokerage operations and continuing to identify and acquire real estate investments with favorable risk-adjusted returns. We also seek to identify and acquire controlling interests in other operating businesses in which we feel we can add value.
We make acquisitions where our expertise in intensive asset management, credit analysis and financial structuring can create value and provide an appropriate risk-adjusted rate of return. We maintain a flexible approach with respect to the nature of our business, seeking to take advantage of opportunities as they arise or are developed.
During 2003 and 2004, we redeployed a large portion of the capital generated through our sale of mortgage-backed securities and from cash distributions from our Bourne End subsidiary. We used a portion of this capital to acquire voting control of Fatburger Holdings Inc. in August 2003 and further increased our investment in Fatburger in May 2004. The expansion and success of Fatburger is currently one of our primary focuses. Since our acquisition, Fatburger has opened 10 additional restaurant locations and currently has agreements for approximately 240 new franchise restaurants.
We have also been investing in special situation real estate loans, and funded four loans totaling $8.0 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2004. Our special situation loans are generally secured by real estate and are typically short-term, with maturities ranging from 6 to 24 months. Due to the unique circumstances relating to these loans, the interest rate charged the borrower is significantly higher than conventional real estate lending.
Due to the varied nature of our operations, management does not utilize a standard array of key performance indicators in evaluating the progress of the Company. Managements evaluation, instead, focuses on an asset-by-asset analysis within the Companys operating segments.
Critical Accounting Policies
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations discusses our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. Management believes the following critical accounting policies, affect its more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of its financial statements.
20
Accounting For Equity Investees
The equity method of accounting is used for investments in associated companies which are not unilaterally controlled by the Company and in which the Companys interest is generally between 20% and 50% of the outstanding voting rights. The Companys share of earnings or losses of associated companies, in which at least 20% of the voting securities is owned, is included in the consolidated statement of operations.
Sale Recognition
During the nine months ended September 30, 2004, we completed the sale of substantially all of our mortgage-backed securities and may sell other assets, from time to time, in the future. Our accounting policy calls for the recognition of sales of financial instruments, including mortgage-backed securities and loans, only when we have irrevocably surrendered control over these assets. We do not retain any recourse or performance obligations with respect to our sales of assets. Our sales were cash sales, and the cash proceeds were not contingent upon any future event.
Fatburger Restaurant and Franchise Revenue
Revenue from the operation of Fatburger company-owned restaurants is recognized when sales occur. Franchise fee revenue from the sale of individual Fatburger franchises is recognized only when all material services or conditions relating to the sales have been substantially performed or satisfied. The completion of training and the opening of a location by the franchisee constitute substantial performance on the part of Fatburger. Nonrefundable deposits collected in relation to the sale of franchises are recorded as deferred franchise fees until the completion of training and the opening of the restaurant, at which time the franchise fee revenue is recognized. In addition to franchise fee revenue, Fatburger collects a royalty ranging from 5% to 6% of gross sales from restaurants operated by franchisees. Fatburger recognizes royalty fees as the related sales are made by the franchisees. Costs relating to continuing franchise support are expensed as incurred.
Fatburger operates on a 52-week calendar and its fiscal year ends on the Sunday closest to December 31. Consistent with the industry, Fatburger measures its stores performance based upon 7 day work weeks. Using the 52-week cycle ensures consistent weekly reporting for operations and ensures that each week has the same days, since certain days are more profitable than others. Accordingly, the accompanying consolidated financial statements reflect a Fatburger quarter end of September 26, 2004.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price and other acquisition related costs over the estimated fair value of the net tangible and intangible assets acquired. The Company does not amortize goodwill. Intangible assets are stated at cost and include trademarks, operating manuals, franchise agreements and leasehold interests. Trademarks, which have indefinite lives, are not subject to amortization. All other intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives, which range from five to fifteen years. The Company assesses potential impairments to intangible assets at least annually, or when there is evidence that events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recovered. Judgments regarding the existence of impairment indicators and future cash flows related to intangible assets are based on operational performance of the acquired businesses, market conditions and other factors.
Long-lived Assets
The Company evaluates its real estate properties, including properties under capital leases, and other similar long-lived assets at least annually, or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts may not be recoverable. The Company first evaluates these assets for indicators of impairment such as significant decreases in the estimated market price of a real estate asset, a significant adverse change in the extent or manner in which a real estate assets is being used or in its physical
21
condition, or cash flow combined with a history of operating cash flow losses or a projection or forecast that demonstrates continuing losses associated with the use of the long-lived asset. When any such indicators of impairment are noted, the Company compares the carrying amount of these assets to the future estimated undiscounted net cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the assets. If the undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying amount, the Company records an impairment charge equal to the excess of carrying value over the assets estimated fair value. Fair value is estimated in consideration of third party value opinions and comparative similar asset prices, whenever available, or internally developed discounted cash flow analyses.
Any long-lived assets which the Company expects to sell or dispose of in the near term are stated at the lower of their carrying amounts or their fair value less the cost to sell, and are evaluated for impairment throughout the sales process.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS ¾ NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2004 COMPARED TO NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2003
NET INCOME. Our net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2004, was $4.9 million, or $0.57 per share, compared with a net income of $4.8 million, or $.56 per share, for the nine months ended September 30, 2003. The net loss for the 2004 period is primarily attributable to operating expenses of $19.1 million and losses from restaurant operations of $1.9 million, partially offset by net interest income of $2.2 million, gain on sale of loans and securities of $2.1 million, loan brokerage fees of $4.2 million, equity in earnings of equity investees of $4.2 million, and gain on sale of a prepaid servicing credit of $1.5 million.
Operating expenses were higher than normal during the nine months ended September 30, 2004 primarily due to a $2.0 million leave of absence payment to Andrew Wiederhorn and the accrual of $2.4 million of future expenses associated with the leave of absence.
The net income for the 2003 period is primarily attributable to net interest income of $2.5 million, gain on sale of loans and securities of $10.7 million, and loan brokerage fees of $3.5 million, partially offset by other operating expenses of $12.5 million and provision for income taxes of $2.3 million.
The following sections describe the results of operations of our operating segments for the nine months ended September 30, 2004:
Restaurant Segment Operations
In August 2003, the Company completed an investment and financing package for Fatburger which involved the acquisition of Series A-1 Preferred and Series D Preferred stock of Fatburger. As a result of our greater than 50% voting control, we began reporting the operations of Fatburger on a consolidated basis beginning August 15, 2003.
During the nine months ending September 30, 2004, we recognized a net loss from our restaurant segment of $1.9 million. This was primarily the result of a gross margin (sales net of cost of goods sold) of $6.6 million and franchise and royalty revenue of $1.0 million, offset by general and administrative costs of $7.9 million, interest expense of $0.4 million, and depreciation and amortization of $1.1 million. The Companys strategy with respect to Fatburger is to increase the number of franchises, thus increasing the franchise fees and future royalty income to the operation.
During the approximately two months from acquisition through September 30, 2003, we recognized a net loss from our restaurant segment of $0.2 million. This was primarily the result of a gross margin (sales net of cost of goods sold) of $1.0 million and franchise and royalty revenue of $0.2 million, offset by general and administrative costs of $0.9 million, interest expense of $0.1 million, depreciation and amortization of $0.1 million and a provision for income taxes of $0.1 million.
22
Commercial Real Estate Mortgage Brokerage Segment Operations
In May 2002, the Company purchased a 51% ownership interest in George Elkins Mortgage Banking Company (George Elkins), a California mortgage banking operation, which, in 2003, provided brokerage services related to the production of over $600 million in commercial real estate mortgages. George Elkins is headquartered in Los Angeles, with satellite offices located throughout the southern California area. The mortgage banking operation also manages a commercial loan servicing portfolio in excess of $700 million for various investors. The Company began reporting the operations of George Elkins on a consolidated basis beginning May 15, 2002.
We had break even operations from the commercial real estate brokerage segment for the nine months ended September 30, 2004, compared to a loss of $0.1 million during the 2003 period. During the 2004 period, we recognized loan brokerage fees of $4.2 million, loan servicing and other revenue of $0.3 million, which was offset by compensation expense of $3.8 million and other operating expense of $0.7 million. During the 2003 period, we recognized loan brokerage fees of $3.5 million, loan servicing and other revenue of $0.4 million, which were offset by compensation expense of $3.2 million and other operating expense of $0.8 million.
Merchant Banking, Real Estate and Finance Segment Operations
NET INTEREST INCOME. Our net interest income for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 was $2.2 million, compared with $2.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003. These results reflect a reduction in interest income on securities of $1.4 million as the result of the sale or repayment of mortgage-backed securities. This decrease was offset by an increase in interest income on loans (reflecting our increased investment in specialty real estate lending) of $0.6 million and a decrease in interest expense of $0.5 million as a result of our repayment of debt related to the mortgage-backed securities. The following tables set forth information regarding the total amount of income from interest-earning assets and expense from interest-bearing liabilities and the resulting average yields and rates:
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004 |
|
||||||
|
|
Average |
|
Interest |
|
Annualized |
|
||
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
||||||
Interest-Earning Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Loan portfolios (1) |
|
$ |
10,718 |
|
$ |
1,569 |
|
19.5 |
% |
Mortgage-backed securities available for sale |
|
16,677 |
|
616 |
|
4.9 |
% |
||
Other investments |
|
11,503 |
|
83 |
|
1.0 |
% |
||
Total interest-earning assets |
|
$ |
38,898 |
|
$ |
2,268 |
|
7.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Interest-Bearing Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Borrowings (2) |
|
$ |
12,335 |
|
$ |
(112 |
) |
1.2 |
% |
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
$ |
12,335 |
|
$ |
(112 |
) |
1.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net interest income before provision for loan losses/spread (3) |
|
|
|
$ |
2,156 |
|
6.6 |
% |
|
Net interest margin (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
7.4 |
% |
(1) Includes loans to senior executives.
(2) Excludes borrowings related to investments in real estate.
(3) Net interest spread represents the difference between the average rate on interest-earning assets and the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities.
(4) Net interest margin represents net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets.
23
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003 |
|
||||||
|
|
Average |
|
Interest |
|
Annualized |
|
||
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
||||||
Interest-Earning Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Loan portfolios (1) |
|
$ |
6,314 |
|
$ |
1,012 |
|
21.4 |
% |
Mortgage-backed securities available for sale |
|
53,750 |
|
1,983 |
|
4.9 |
% |
||
Other investments |
|
14,309 |
|
125 |
|
1.2 |
% |
||
Total interest-earning assets |
|
$ |
74,373 |
|
$ |
3,120 |
|
5.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Interest-Bearing Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Borrowings (2) |
|
$ |
31,762 |
|
$ |
(578 |
) |
2.4 |
% |
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
$ |
31,762 |
|
$ |
(578 |
) |
2.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net interest income before provision for loan losses/spread (3) |
|
|
|
$ |
2,542 |
|
3.2 |
% |
|
Net interest margin (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
4.6 |
% |
(1) Includes loans to senior executives.
(2) Excludes borrowings related to investments in real estate.
(3) Net interest spread represents the difference between the average rate on interest-earning assets and the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities.
(4) Net interest margin represents net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets.
REAL ESTATE OPERATIONS. Our real estate operations represent activity from our direct investment in commercial property, as well as the operations of our leasehold interest in freestanding retail buildings. During the nine months ended September 30, 2004, we realized a net income from real estate operations of $0.6 million, compared with a net income from real estate operations of $0.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003.
In October 2002, the Company assumed leasehold interests in 109 free-standing retail stores located throughout the United States. We have sold or terminated 8 of the leasehold interests and purchased and retained the direct fee ownership interest in 20 of the retail buildings. As a result, as of September 30, 2004 we owned 20 properties directly with a carrying value of $7.4 million. Of the remaining leases, 36 were on terms and conditions that required capitalization of the obligation. As of September 30, 2004, we had real estate subject to capital leases of $13.4 million and a related capital lease obligation of $12.3 million. The remaining 45 leases are classified as operating leases. All of our subleases are accounted for as operating leases.
The properties are sublet to a broad tenant mix including convenience stores, shoe stores, video rental outlets, auto parts dealers, carpet retailers and other small businesses. The retail properties cover approximately 460,000 square feet of retail space located in 24 states. The stores are free-standing, retail locations ranging from 4,500-7,000 square feet each. The initial term of the leasehold interests has an average expiration of approximately 6 years. However, the Company is entitled to exercise extension options which will allow the Company to control the properties for an additional 15 to 30 years. As of September 30, 2004, there were vacancies in 10 of the retail buildings.
OTHER OPERATING INCOME. Our other operating income was approximately $8.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2004. This compares to other operating income of $13.0 million for the nine months ended September 30 2003. The primary components of our net other operating income include the following:
24
Equity In Earnings Of Equity Investees. We recognized our share of the earnings of equity investees in the amount of $4.2 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2004. This compares to earnings of $1.4 million during the 2003 period. In December 2000, we arranged and participated in the purchase of all of the outstanding capital stock of Bourne End Properties Ltd. (Bourne End) through a 26% owned Jersey, Channel Islands Company known as BEP Acquisitions (BEP). Bourne End is a specialist investor in retail property located in the United Kingdom. We account for this investment using the equity method, thereby recording our share of income and expense generated by BEP. Equity in earnings of equity investees during the 2004 and 2003 periods are primarily the result of our investment in Bourne End.
Prepaid Loan Servicing Credit. During the nine months ended September 30, 2004, we sold our Wilshire Credit Corporation (WCC) prepaid loan servicing credit (the Loan Servicing Credit) for $1.5 million in cash. The Loan Servicing Credit was originally acquired by us in 1998, when we were an affiliate of WCC. The Loan Servicing Credit may be used, subject to certain limitations, to pay for loan portfolio servicing activities performed by WCC. As a result of the sale, we recognized a gain in the amount of $1.5 million.
Gain On The Sale Of Loans And Securities. During the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, we sold loans and securities to unrelated third parties for approximately $29.1 million and $13.8 million, respectively, resulting in gains of approximately $2.1 million and $10.7 million, respectively.
OPERATING EXPENSES. During the nine months ended September 30, 2004, operating expenses from our merchant banking, real estate and finance segment were comprised of compensation and employee benefits of $4.2 million, leave of absence expense of $4.8 million, professional fees of $1.9 million and other costs of $3.8 million. The leave of absence expense consists of the $2.0 million leave of absence payment that was paid to Mr. Wiederhorn on June 2, 2004 and an accrual of $2.8 million which is expected to be paid during the period of the leave of absence.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2003, operating expenses from our merchant banking, real estate and finance segment were comprised of compensation and employee benefits of $4.9 million, professional fees of $1.4 million and other costs of $2.2 million.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS ¾ QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2004 COMPARED TO QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2003
NET INCOME. Our net income for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 was $0.9 million, or $0.11 per share, compared with net income of $0.6 million, or $0.06 per share, for the quarter ended September 30, 2003. The net income for the 2004 period is primarily attributable to net interest income of $0.5 million; equity in earnings of equity investees of $2.7 million, and loan brokerage fees of $1.8 million, partially offset by operating expenses of $4.8 million.
The net income for the 2003 period is primarily attributable to net interest income of $1.0 million; gain on sale of loans and securities of $1.3 million, equity in earnings of equity investees of $0.5 million, and loan brokerage fees of $1.2 million, partially offset by other operating expenses of $3.6 million and $0.6 million in provision for income taxes.
The following sections describe the results of operations of our operating segments for the three months ended September 30, 2004:
25
Restaurant Segment Operations
As a result of our voting control, we began reporting the operations of Fatburger on a consolidated basis beginning August 15, 2003.
During the three months ending September 30, 2004, we recognized a net loss from our restaurant segment of $0.3 million. This was primarily the result of a gross margin (sales net of cost of goods sold) of $2.4 million and franchise and royalty revenue of $0.3 million, offset by general and administrative costs of $2.5 million, interest expense of $0.1 million, and depreciation and amortization of $0.4 million.
During the approximately two months from acquisition through September 30, 2003, we recognized a net loss from our restaurant segment of $0.2 million. This was primarily the result of a gross margin (sales net of cost of goods sold) of $1.0 million and franchise and royalty revenue of $0.2 million, offset by general and administrative costs of $0.9 million, interest expense of $0.1 million, depreciation and amortization of $0.1 million and a provision for income taxes of $0.1 million.
Commercial Real Estate Mortgage Brokerage Segment Operations
The commercial real estate brokerage segment produced net income of $0.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2004, compared to a loss of less than $0.1 million during the comparable 2003 period. During the 2004 period, we recognized loan brokerage fees of $1.8 million, which was offset by compensation expense of $1.5 million and other operating expense of $0.2 million. During the 2003 period, we recognized loan brokerage fees of $1.2 million, loan servicing and other revenue of $0.1 million, which was offset by compensation expense of $1.1 million and other operating expense of $0.3 million.
Merchant Banking, Real Estate and Finance Segment Operations
NET INTEREST INCOME. Our net interest income for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 was $0.5 million, compared with $1.0 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2003. The decrease is primarily attributable to a reduction in interest income on securities of $0.5 million as the result of the sale or repayment of mortgage-backed securities. a decrease in interest expense of $0.2 million as a result of our repayment of debt related to the mortgage-backed securities. The following tables set forth information regarding the total amount of income from interest-earning assets and expense from interest-bearing liabilities and the resulting average yields and rates:
|
|
For the Quarter Ended September 30, 2004 |
|
||||||
|
|
Average |
|
Interest |
|
Annualized |
|
||
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
||||||
Interest-Earning Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Loan portfolios (1) |
|
$ |
13,017 |
|
$ |
507 |
|
15.6 |
% |
Mortgage-backed securities available for sale |
|
29 |
|
11 |
|
151.7 |
% |
||
Other investments |
|
7,241 |
|
13 |
|
0.7 |
% |
||
Total interest-earning assets |
|
$ |
20,287 |
|
$ |
531 |
|
10.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Interest-Bearing Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Borrowings (2) |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net interest income before provision for loan losses/spread (3) |
|
|
|
$ |
531 |
|
10.5 |
% |
|
Net interest margin (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
10.5 |
% |
26
(1) Includes loans to senior executives.
(2) Excludes borrowings related to investments in real estate.
(3) Net interest spread represents the difference between the average rate on interest-earning assets and the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities.
(4) Net interest margin represents net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets.
|
|
For the Quarter Ended September 30, 2003 |
|
||||||
|
|
Average |
|
Interest |
|
Annualized |
|
||
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
||||||
Interest-Earning Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Loan portfolios (1) |
|
$ |
6,562 |
|
$ |
588 |
|
35.8 |
% |
Mortgage-backed securities available for sale |
|
45,453 |
|
509 |
|
4.5 |
% |
||
Other investments |
|
15,153 |
|
35 |
|
1.00 |
% |
||
Total interest-earning assets |
|
$ |
67,168 |
|
$ |
1,132 |
|
6.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Interest-Bearing Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Borrowings (2) |
|
$ |
26,966 |
|
$ |
(160 |
) |
2.4 |
% |
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
$ |
26,966 |
|
$ |
(160 |
) |
2.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net interest income before provision for loan losses/spread (3) |
|
|
|
$ |
972 |
|
4.4 |
% |
|
Net interest margin (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
5.8 |
% |
(1) Includes loans to senior executives.
(2) Excludes borrowings related to investments in real estate.
(3) Net interest spread represents the difference between the average rate on interest-earning assets and the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities.
(4) Net interest margin represents net interest income divided by average interest-earning
REAL ESTATE OPERATIONS. Our real estate operations represent activity from our investment in various office buildings, retail stores, and other commercial property. During the quarter ended September 30, 2004, we realized net income of $0.5 million from real estate operations, compared with net income of $0.1 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2003.
OTHER OPERATING INCOME. Our other operating income was approximately $3.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2004. This compares to other operating income of $2.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2003. The primary components of our other operating income include the following:
Equity in Earnings of Equity Investees. We recognized our share of the earnings of equity investees in the amount of $2.7 million during the three months ended September 30, 2004. This compares to earnings of $0.5 million during the comparable 2003 period. Equity in earnings of equity investees during the 2004 and 2003 periods are primarily the result of our investment in Bourne End.
Gain on the Sale of Loans and Securities. There were no sales of loans or securities during the three months ended September 30, 2004. During the three months ended September 30, 2003, we sold loans and securities to unrelated third parties for approximately $1.8 million resulting in gains of approximately $1.3 million.
27
OPERATING EXPENSES. During the three months ended September 30, 2004, operating expenses from our merchant banking, real estate and financial segment were comprised of compensation and employee benefits of $0.9 million, professional fees of $0.8 million and other costs of $1.3 million.
During the three months ended September 30, 2003, operating expenses were comprised of compensation and employee benefits of $1.2 million, professional fees of $0.4 million and other costs of $0.7 million.
CHANGES IN FINANCIAL CONDITION
GENERAL. Total assets decreased from approximately $109.0 million at December 31, 2003 to approximately $73.5 million at September 30, 2004. Total liabilities decreased from approximately $63.6 million at December 31, 2003 to approximately $39.1 million at September 30, 2004. The decline in total assets and liabilities was primarily the result of sales of our mortgage-backed securities and repayment of the related borrowings. Stockholders equity decreased by approximately $11.0 million resulting primarily from our net loss of $4.9 million, dividends declared of $3.3 million, the purchase of treasury stock of $1.7 million and purchase of a call option of $0.6 million.
SECURITIES AVAILABLE FOR SALE. The balance of mortgage-backed securities available for sale decreased from $35.5 million at December 31, 2003 to less than $0.1 million at September 30, 2004. The decrease was primarily the result of the sale of mortgage-backed securities with a carrying value of $29.1 million and cash repayments of securities of $6.9 million, partially offset by increases in market value of $1.4 million.
LOAN PORTFOLIO. We invest in special situation loans, generally secured by real estate. These loans are typically short-term, with maturities ranging from 6 to 24 months. Due to the unique circumstances relating to the loans, the interest rate charged the borrower is significantly higher than conventional real estate lending. As of September 30, 2004, our special situation loan portfolio consisted of seven individual loans with a combined carrying value of $10.4 million. Six of the seven loans are secured by real estate consisting of multi-family, commercial or single-family properties located in California, Texas, Maine, and Nevada. One loan is secured by all of the stock and assets of a commercial manufacturing business. The loans have a weighted average interest rate, excluding fees, of 14.5% and a weighted average maturity of six months.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2004, our loan portfolio increased by approximately $6.7 million. This was primarily the result of the acquisition of four new loans with a carrying value totaling $7.7 million. As of September 30, 2004, two of the Companys loans totaling $2.0 million had been restructured to provide additional time for repayment by the borrowers in exchange for various extension fees or other new terms. As a result, these loans were considered impaired for accounting purposes, however, no impairment reserves were required on these loans due to managements expectation that the carrying amounts will be collected.
INVESTMENTS IN REAL ESTATE. Investments in real estate increased by $5.4 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2004. The increase was primarily due to the purchase of the fee interest in two freestanding retail buildings for $0.4 million, the purchase of two apartment buildings in Barcelona, Spain for $4.2 million and capital improvements of $1.7 million, partially offset by the sale of two properties for $0.4 million and depreciation of $0.5 million.
LOANS
TO SENIOR EXECUTIVES. Prior to the
passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we had an employment agreement with
Mr. Wiederhorn which allowed him to borrow a specified maximum amount from us
to purchase shares of the Companys Common Stock in the open market. The resulting loans are full recourse,
secured loans bearing interest at the prime rate. At September 30, 2004, in addition to
the $2 million loan to Mr. Wiederhorn described below, we had outstanding loans
to
Mr. Wiederhorn, including accrued interest, of approximately $1.0 million. The Company is not obligated to make
additional advances on loans under the current employment agreement. The loans to Mr. Wiederhorn are further
described as follows:
28
On February 21, 2002, we loaned Mr. Wiederhorn $175,000 to finance the purchase of Common Stock. This loan is full recourse to Mr. Wiederhorn and is secured by all of Mr. Wiederhorns rights under his employment agreement. We are entitled to net amounts payable under the employment agreement against any amounts payable by Mr. Wiederhorn upon any default or at maturity of the loan. At Mr. Wiederhorns direction (in accordance with the terms of his employment agreement), on February 21, 2002, we loaned a limited partnership controlled by Mr. Wiederhorns spouse (the LP) $687,000 to finance the purchase of Common Stock. The loan is secured by the membership interests of two limited liability companies owned by the LP. The limited liability companies each own a parcel of real property in Oregon and have no liabilities. At the time of the loan, the real property had an appraised value of $725,000. The loan is also guaranteed by Mr. Wiederhorn. The Common Stock purchased with the proceeds of these loans does not serve as security for the loans. The loans are due on February 21, 2007, and bear interest at the prime rate, as published in the Wall Street Journal, which interest is added to the principal annually.
Prior to the passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we loaned Mr. Wiederhorn $2.0 million. This loan is full recourse to Mr. Wiederhorn and his spouse and is secured by trust deeds on two residences located in Oregon. The loan is due on August 1, 2007 and bears interest at 8.5% per annum, payable monthly. The Board of Directors (with Mr. Wiederhorn abstaining) concluded that the terms of the loan were at least as favorable to the Company as would be available in an arms length, third party transaction and approved the loan on July 9, 2002.
Further information on these loans to executives is included in our 2003 annual report on Form 10-K and proxy statements for our 2003 and prior years Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The employment agreement has been previously filed with the SEC.
INVESTMENT IN BOURNE END. In December 2000, we organized and led a group of investors to purchase all of the outstanding capital stock of Bourne End, a specialist investor in retail property. At the time of the acquisition, Bourne End had approximately GBP 169.6 million of assets and GBP 123.1 million of debt. The real estate assets consisted of 1.7 million square feet in fifteen shopping centers located in the United Kingdom. As of September 30, 2004, Bourne End had sold fourteen of the original fifteen shopping centers. The sales are consistent with the investor groups strategy to reposition each of the centers, including selected new capital expenditures on existing space and new development on excess or adjoining land, with the ultimate goal of reselling the properties.
Bourne End is in the process of selling its last remaining shopping center, which it hopes to sell within the next 12 months. At that point, Bourne End is expected to be liquidated and we will receive our share of any remaining assets or proceeds of Bourne End.
Our investment in Bourne End decreased by $0.2 million to $2.0 million at September 30, 2004. The decrease was primarily the result of our receipt of cash distributions from Bourne End of $4.4 million, partially offset by the recognition of $4.2 million our share of the earnings of Bourne End.
RESTAURANT PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, NET. Our investment in restaurant property, plant and equipment, net of depreciation, increased $0.1 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2004 to a balance of $6.0 million. The increase was primarily the result of approximately $1.1 million of additions to equipment, furniture and fixtures relating to new restaurant openings, less depreciation expense of approximately $1.0 million, during the period.
INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET. Primarily as a result of the acquisition and consolidation of Fatburger, as of September 30, 2004 we had intangible assets, net of amortization, of $5.5 million. This consisted of trademark rights of approximately $4.0 million, franchise agreements of approximately $1.0 million and other miscellaneous intangible assets of $0.5 million. Intangible assets decreased $0.1 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2004 primarily as the result of amortization expense.
GOODWILL. Primarily as a result of the acquisition and consolidation of Fatburger, we had recorded goodwill of $7.5 million as of September 30, 2004.
29
OTHER ASSETS. At September 30, 2004, the Companys other assets consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):
Capitalized deferred compensation |
|
$ |
971 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
370 |
|
|
Rent receivable |
|
333 |
|
|
Investment in operating leases |
|
329 |
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
256 |
|
|
Other |
|
1,701 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,960 |
|
The capitalized deferred compensation included in other assets relates to the acquisition of George Elkins. In conjunction with the acquisition, certain employees of George Elkins entered into long-term employment agreements. These employees received payments totaling $1.9 million which we capitalized as deferred compensation. The employees are obligated to perform under the employment agreements and must repay any unearned deferred compensation payments upon early termination. The deferred compensation is earned ratably over the terms of the employment agreements, and we are amortizing the $1.9 million investment over the remaining terms, which range from 8 to 32 months.
REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS, BORROWINGS AND NOTES PAYABLE. Our repurchase agreements, borrowings and notes payable decreased $25.6 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2004 to an ending balance of $7.5 million. This was primarily the result of the repayment of repurchase agreements upon the sale of mortgage-backed securities.
OBLIGATIONS UNDER CAPITAL LEASES. Obligations under capital leases decreased approximately $0.3 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2004. This decrease was primarily the result of the scheduled amortization of the obligations.
DEFERRED INCOME. Franchise fee revenue from the sales of individual Fatburger franchises is recognized only when all material services or conditions relating to the sales have been substantially performed or satisfied. The completion of training and the opening of a location by the franchisee constitute substantial performance. Fatburger charges $40,000 per location in franchise fees. One-half of the fees are collected in cash at the time the franchise rights are granted and the balance is collected at the time the lease for the location is executed. Nonrefundable deposits collected in relation to the sale of franchises are recorded as deferred franchise fees until the completion of training and the opening of the restaurant, at which time the franchise fee revenue is recognized. As of September 30, 2004, our deferred income relating to the collection of unearned Fatburger franchise fees was $4.4 million, an increase of $0.7 million from December 31, 2003. The increase was primarily the result of the collection of nonrefundable deposits on new franchises. As of September 30, 2004, nearly all of the deferred income was comprised of the initial $20,000 non-refundable deposit received per location and the balance of the franchise fee will be collected in cash as leases on these locations are signed.
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES. Our deferred income taxes decreased $1.1 million to $5.9 million at September 30, 2004. This was primarily the result of a decrease in the accrued taxes associated with unrealized gains on mortgage-backed securities. As of September 30, 2004, we had, for U.S. Federal tax purposes, a net operating loss (NOL) carryforward of approximately $76.1 million, including $11.5 million relating to Fatburger. The NOL carryforward may reduce the future cash payment of the deferred income tax liability. Our NOL begins to expire in 2018. Fatburgers NOL begins to expire in 2004 and is generally subject to an annual limitation under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, Section 382, Limitation on Net Operating Loss Carryovers and Certain Built-In Losses Following Change in Control. In addition, to the extent the Fatburger NOL is utilized, the recognition of the related tax benefits would first reduce goodwill related to Fatburger acquisition, then other non-current intangible assets related to that acquisition, and then income tax expense in accordance with Statement on Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes.
30
United States tax regulations impose limitations on the use of NOL carry forwards following certain changes in ownership. If such a change were to occur with respect to the Company, the limitation could significantly reduce the amount of benefits that would be available to offset future taxable income each year, starting with the year of ownership change. To reduce the likelihood of such ownership changes, we established a Shareholder Rights Plan dated as of October 18, 2002, which discourages, under certain circumstances, ownership changes which would trigger the NOL limitations.
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY. Stockholders equity decreased by approximately $11.0 million resulting primarily from our net loss of $4.9 million, purchase of treasury stock of $1.7 million, the purchase of a call option on the Companys stock of $0.6 million and dividends declared of $3.3 million.
In April 2004 we purchased 330,500 shares of our common stock from a stockholder. The purchase price was $5.40 per share and the shares were placed in treasury.
In April 2004 we purchased a three year call option (the Call Option) from Andrew A. Wiederhorn, the Companys former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and current Chief Strategic Officer. The Call Option gives us the right, but not the obligation, to purchase 423,245 of the Companys outstanding common stock (the Option Shares) from Mr. Wiederhorn for a purchase price of $3.99 per share. The option may be exercised at any time during the three year option period. We paid $750,000 ($1.77 per option share) for the Call Option.
Liquidity is a measurement of our ability to meet potential cash requirements, including ongoing commitments to repay borrowings, fund restaurant operations and other businesses, engage in loan acquisition and lending activities, and for other general business purposes. The primary sources of funds for liquidity during the nine months ended September 30, 2004, consisted of net cash provided by investing activities, including interest and principal payments related to our mortgage-backed securities portfolio, the sale of mortgage-backed securities and distributions from Bourne End. As of September 30, 2004, we had cash and cash equivalents of $7.1 million, which we believe will be sufficient to meet our current liquidity requirements.
Our borrowings and the availability of further borrowings are substantially affected by, among other things, changes in interest rates, or decreases in credit quality of our underlying assets. Fluctuations in interest rates will continue to impact our net interest income to the extent our fixed rate assets are funded by variable rate debt or our variable rate assets reprice on a different schedule or in relation to a different index than any floating rate debt which in turn could impact potential returns to shareholders. The impact of borrowings on the Company has become less significant as it sold its mortgage-backed securities portfolio.
At September 30, 2004, we had total consolidated secured indebtedness of $20.4 million, as well as $18.7 million of other liabilities. The consolidated secured indebtedness consisted of (i) $12.7 million outstanding of obligations under capital leases maturing between 2010 and 2040 which are primarily secured by real estate, (ii) long-term debt of Fatburger of $6.2 million secured by substantially all of the assets of Fatburger and (iii) borrowings secured by an apartment building in Barcelona, Spain in the amount of $1.5 million. None of this indebtedness had terms which allowed the lender to request additional collateral if the value of the underlying collateral declined.
If our existing liquidity position were to prove insufficient, and we were unable to repay, renew or replace maturing indebtedness on terms reasonably satisfactory to us, we may be required to sell (potentially on short notice) a portion of our assets, and could incur losses as a result. Also, Fatburger is involved in a nationwide expansion of franchise locations, which will require significant liquidity. If Fatburger or its franchisees are unsuccessful in obtaining credit lines sufficient to fund this expansion, the timing of restaurant openings may be delayed.
31
Historically, we have regularly sold assets as a normal, recurring part of our operations. However, excluding the sale of assets from time to time, we would have been operating with negative cash flow, since many of our assets do not generate current cash flows sufficient to cover current operating expenses. We believe that our existing sources of funds will be adequate for purposes of meeting our liquidity needs; however, there can be no assurance that this will be the case. Greater demands for liquidity at our operating subsidiaries, including Fatburger and our real estate operations, or material decreases in monthly cash receipts, generally would negatively impact our liquidity. On the other hand, improvements in cash flow from our operating subsidiaries or real estate investments, or a decrease in operating expense would positively affect our liquidity.
Effective October 14, 2004, our Common Stock began trading in the over-the-counter (OTC) market on the OTC pink sheets. Prior to that, our Common Stock was quoted on the Nasdaq National Market. On July 20, 2004, we were notified by Nasdaq of a staff determination to delist the Companys Common Stock effective July 29, 2004. We challenged the staff determination and requested an oral hearing by a Listing Qualifications Panel to review the staffs conclusions. A hearing was held on September 9, 2004, and, on October 12, 2004, we were notified by Nasdaq that the Listing Qualifications Panel upheld the staff determination and the Companys Common Stock was delisted from the Nasdaq National Market on October 14, 2004. We have requested a review of the Listing Qualifications Panels decision by Nasdaqs Listing and Hearing Review Council.
Trading of our Common Stock in the OTC pink sheets may reduce the liquidity of the our Common Stock compared to quotation on the Nasdaq National Market. Also, the coverage of the Company by security analysts and media could be reduced, which could result in lower prices for the our Common Stock than might otherwise prevail and could also result in increased spreads between the bid and ask prices for the our Common Stock. Additionally, certain investors will not purchase securities that are not quoted on the Nasdaq Stock Market, which could materially impair our ability to raise funds through the issuance of Common Stock or other securities convertible into Common Stock.
In addition, if the trading price of the our Common Stock is less than $5.00 per share, trading in our Common Stock could also be subject to the requirements of Rule 15g-9 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Under that Rule, brokers and dealers who recommend such low priced securities to persons other than established customers and accredited investors must satisfy special sales practice requirements, including a requirement that they make an individualized written suitability determination for the purchaser and receive the purchasers written consent prior to any transaction. The Securities Enforcement Remedies and Penny Stock Reform Act of 1990 also requires additional disclosure in connection with any trades involving a stock defined as a penny stock (generally, according to regulations adopted by the SEC, any equity security not traded on an exchange or quoted on Nasdaq that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions), including the delivery, prior to any penny stock transaction, of a disclosure schedule explaining the penny stock market and the risks associated therewith. Such requirements could severely limit the market liquidity of our Common Stock. There can be no assurance that our Common Stock will not become treated as penny stock.
Since December 31, 2004, our expected payments under contractual obligations decreased materially due primarily to the repayment of $25.3 million of short-term repurchase agreements upon the sale of mortgage-backed securities. Additionally, Fatburger refinanced approximately $5.4 million in debt, which reduced the interest rate and lengthened the maturity of the debt. The following table provides information on the amounts of payments due under contractual obligations as of September 30, 2004 (dollars in thousands):
32
|
|
Payments due by Period |
|
|||||||||||||
Contractual obligations: |
|
Total |
|
Less than 1 |
|
1-3 years |
|
3-5 years |
|
More than 5 |
|
|||||
Borrowings and notes payable |
|
$ |
7,699 |
|
$ |
371 |
|
$ |
2,510 |
|
$ |
826 |
|
$ |
3,992 |
|
Interest payments on borrowings and notes payable |
|
3,212 |
|
312 |
|
613 |
|
539 |
|
1,748 |
|
|||||
Obligations under capital leases (1) |
|
35,085 |
|
1,683 |
|
3,344 |
|
3,190 |
|
26,868 |
|
|||||
Obligations under operating leases |
|
12,227 |
|
2,812 |
|
4,382 |
|
2,043 |
|
2,990 |
|
|||||
Obligations under employment contracts |
|
2,726 |
|
2,463 |
|
263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Purchase obligations (2) |
|
447 |
|
447 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total |
|
$ |
61,396 |
|
$ |
8,088 |
|
$ |
11,112 |
|
$ |
6,598 |
|
$ |
35,598 |
|
(1) The amount of imputed interest to reduce the minimum capital lease payments to present value is $22.4 million using an effective interest rate of 8.5%.
(2) As of September 30, 2004, Fatburger was under contract to purchase advertising for $0.4 million.
OFF BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
In order to facilitate the development of franchise locations, as of September 30, 2004, Fatburger had guaranteed the annual minimum lease payments of three restaurant sites owned and operated by franchisees. The amount of the guarantees approximate $1.9 million plus certain contingent rental payments as defined in the respective leases. These leases expire at various times though 2008.
We did not have any other off balance sheet arrangements in place as of September 30, 2004.
33
Market risk is the exposure to loss resulting from changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, commodity prices, and equity prices. We have some exposure to foreign currency fluctuations (approximately 15% of the Companys equity is invested in assets located in Europe at September 30, 2004).
With the sale of substantially all of our mortgage-backed securities, our exposure to interest rate risk has been significantly reduced. However, we continue to face interest rate risk, primarily in our special situation loan portfolio. This type of risk is highly sensitive to many factors beyond our control, including governmental monetary and tax policies, domestic and international economic and political considerations, and other factors. Changes in the general level of interest rates can affect our net interest income by affecting the spread between our interest-earning assets and our interest-bearing liabilities. Changes in the level of interest rates can also affect, among other things, the value of our interest-earning assets and our ability to acquire loans. Our real estate and restaurant operations are primarily funded by fixed rate debt or equity. As demonstrated in the tables below, we believe that a modest increase in interest rates will not have a significant effect on our profitability or equity value.
It is our objective to attempt to control risks associated with interest rate movements. In general, our strategy is to limit our exposure to earnings variations and variations in the value of assets and liabilities as interest rates change over time. Our asset and liability management strategy is formulated and monitored regularly to review, among other things, the sensitivity of our assets and liabilities to interest rate changes, the book and market values of assets and liabilities, unrealized gains and losses, including those attributable to hedging transactions, purchase and securitization activity, and maturities of investments and borrowings.
The following table quantifies the potential changes in net interest income and net portfolio value as of September 30, 2004 should interest rates go up or down (shocked) by 100 or 200 basis points, assuming the yield curves of the rate shocks will be parallel to each other and instantaneous. Net portfolio value is calculated as the sum of the value of off-balance sheet instruments and the present value of cash in-flows generated from interest-earning assets net of cash out-flows in respect of interest-bearing liabilities. The cash flows associated with the loan portfolios and securities available for sale are calculated based on prepayment and default rates that vary by asset but not by changes in interest rates. Projected losses, as well as prepayments, are generated based upon the actual experience with the subject pool, as well as similar, more seasoned pools. To the extent available, loan characteristics such as loan-to-value ratio, interest rate, credit history and product types are used to produce the projected loss and prepayment assumptions that are included in the cash flow projections of the securities. The following table applies the U.S. Treasury yield curve generally for assets and LIBOR for repurchase agreement liabilities and assume a uniform change in both rates. The table assumes that changes in interest rates occur instantaneously. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimated in the table.
Projected Percent Change In |
|
||||||||||
Change in Interest |
|
Net Interest |
|
Net Portfolio |
|
Change in Annual |
|
Change in Net |
|
||
-200 Basis Points |
|
-5.1 |
% |
-4.0 |
% |
$ |
(72,000 |
) |
$ |
(1,369,000 |
) |
-100 Basis Points |
|
-4.4 |
% |
-1.9 |
% |
$ |
(63,000 |
) |
$ |
(654,000 |
) |
0 Basis Points |
|
0.0 |
% |
0.0 |
% |
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
100 Basis Points |
|
5.7 |
% |
1.8 |
% |
$ |
81,000 |
|
$ |
600,000 |
|
200 Basis Points |
|
11.3 |
% |
3.4 |
% |
$ |
161,000 |
|
$ |
1,149,000 |
|
(1) Assumes that uniform changes occur instantaneously in both the yield on 10-year U.S. Treasury notes and the interest rate applicable to U.S. dollar deposits in the London interbank market.
34
The following table sets forth information as to the type of funding used to finance the Companys assets as of September 30, 2004. As indicated in the table, a large percentage of the Companys fixed-rate assets are currently not financed and the Companys variable-rate assets are generally funded by variable-rate liabilities.
Assets and Liabilities
As of September 30, 2004
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Basis Amount |
|
Coupon Type |
|
Liability |
|
Type |
|
||
Interest-Bearing Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Fixed-rate asset, financed floating |
|
$ |
|
|
Fixed |
|
$ |
|
|
LIBOR |
|
Fixed-rate assets, no financing |
|
12,427 |
|
Fixed |
|
|
|
None |
|
||
Variable-rate, financed variable |
|
|
|
1 TCM (1) |
|
|
|
LIBOR |
|
||
Variable-rate assets, no financing |
|
975 |
|
Prime |
|
|
|
None |
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
7,103 |
|
N/A |
|
|
|
None |
|
||
Subtotal |
|
20,505 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Other Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Investments in real estate |
|
28,009 |
|
N/A |
|
14,151 |
|
Fixed |
|
||
Investment in BEP |
|
1,969 |
|
N/A |
|
|
|
None |
|
||
Restaurant property, plant and equipment |
|
6,036 |
|
N/A |
|
6,232 |
|
Fixed |
|
||
Intangible assets, net |
|
5,456 |
|
N/A |
|
|
|
None |
|
||
Goodwill |
|
7,541 |
|
N/A |
|
|
|
None |
|
||
Other |
|
3,960 |
|
N/A |
|
|
|
None |
|
||
Subtotal |
|
52,971 |
|
|
|
20,383 |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Liability Only |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Deferred income |
|
|
|
|
|
4,426 |
|
None |
|
||
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
5,880 |
|
None |
|
||
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
8,417 |
|
None |
|
||
Total |
|
$ |
73,476 |
|
|
|
$ |
39,106 |
|
|
|
(1) 1 TCM means the one year Treasury Constant Maturity Index.
Asset and liability management involves managing the timing and magnitude of the repricing of assets and liabilities. It is our objective to attempt to control risks associated with interest rate movements. Asset and liability management can utilize a wide variety of off-balance sheet financial techniques to assist it in the management of interest rate risk. For example, in hedging the interest rate and exchange rate exposure of a foreign currency denominated asset or liability, we may enter into hedge transactions to counter movements in the different currencies as well as interest rates in those currencies. These hedges may be in the form of currency and interest rate swaps, options, and forwards, or combinations thereof. No such interest rate techniques were in use as of September 30, 2004.
Methods for evaluating interest rate risk include an analysis of our interest rate sensitivity gap, which is defined as the difference between interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities maturing or repricing within a given time period. A gap is considered positive when the amount of interest-rate sensitive assets exceeds the amount of interest-rate sensitive liabilities. A gap is considered negative when the amount of interest-rate sensitive liabilities exceeds interest-rate sensitive assets. During a period of rising interest rates, a negative gap would tend to adversely affect net interest income, while a positive gap would tend to result in an increase in net interest income. During a period of falling interest rates, a negative gap would tend to result in an increase in net interest income, while a positive gap would tend to affect net interest income adversely. Since different types of assets and liabilities with the same or similar maturities may react differently to changes in overall market rates or conditions, changes in interest rates may affect net interest income positively or negatively even if an institution were perfectly matched in each maturity category.
35
The following table sets forth the estimated contractual maturity or repricing of our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities at September 30, 2004.
As of September 30, 2004
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Within |
|
4 to 12 |
|
One Year to |
|
More than |
|
TOTAL |
|
|||||
Interest-sensitive assets(1): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
7,103 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
7,103 |
|
Securities available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
10 |
|
|||||
Loans |
|
2,711 |
|
862 |
|
6,844 |
|
|
|
10,417 |
|
|||||
Loans to senior executives |
|
|
|
975 |
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
2,975 |
|
|||||
Total rate-sensitive assets |
|
$ |
9,814 |
|
$ |
1,837 |
|
$ |
6,844 |
|
$ |
2,010 |
|
$ |
20,505 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Interest-sensitive liabilities : |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Borrowings and notes payable |
|
$ |
5,650 |
|
$ |
1,467 |
|
$ |
|
|
582 |
|
$ |
7,699 |
|
|
Obligations under capital leases |
|
126 |
|
378 |
|
1,008 |
|
11,172 |
|
12,684 |
|
|||||
Total rate-sensitive liabilities |
|
$ |
5,776 |
|
$ |
1,845 |
|
$ |
1,008 |
|
$ |
11,754 |
|
$ |
20,383 |
|
Interest rate sensitivity gap |
|
4,038 |
|
(8 |
) |
5,836 |
|
(9,744 |
) |
|
|
|||||
Cumulative interest rate sensitivity gap |
|
4,038 |
|
4.030 |
|
9,866 |
|
122 |
|
|
|
|||||
Cumulative interest rate sensitivity gap as a percentage of total rate-sensitive assets |
|
20 |
% |
20 |
% |
48 |
% |
1 |
% |
|
|
(1) Real estate property holdings are not considered interest rate sensitive.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(A) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. Our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, after evaluating the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this report, have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were adequate and designed to ensure that material information relating to us and our consolidated subsidiaries would be made known to us by others within these entities.
(B) Changes in internal control over financial reporting. There were no significant changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our third fiscal quarter of 2004 that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.
(C) Reportable Conditions Fatburger. Prior to our acquisition of Fatburger, the independent auditors, Ernst & Young LLP, determined that Fatburger had significant deficiencies in internal control which may affect its ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data. While not constituting a material weakness, as of September 30, 2004, the deficiencies had not been fully resolved by Fatburger. The issues were as follows:
A lack of sufficient resources in the accounting department to handle the day-to-day transactions and record all adjustments for the financial statements.
A lack of sufficient controls over the information reported to Fatburger from the franchisees, which may result in a misstatement of royalty income.
Subsequent to our acquisition, Fatburger hired highly qualified individuals to serve as chief financial officer and as corporate controller. Additional accounting staff positions have also been filled. The management of Fatburger is in the process of testing and implementing an integrated point of sale information system which will provide the basis for controls relating to the information from all restaurants, including franchisee operated locations. The Company believes that both of the reportable conditions will be resolved in the near future.
36
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
CERTAIN STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN AND CERTAIN STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN FUTURE FILINGS BY THE COMPANY WITH THE SEC MAY NOT BE BASED ON HISTORICAL FACTS AND ARE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS WITHIN THE MEANING OF SECTION 27A OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED, AND SECTION 21E OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED. FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS WHICH ARE BASED ON VARIOUS ASSUMPTIONS (SOME OF WHICH ARE BEYOND THE COMPANYS CONTROL) MAY BE IDENTIFIED BY REFERENCE TO A FUTURE PERIOD OR PERIODS, OR BY THE USE OF FORWARD-LOOKING TERMINOLOGY, SUCH AS MAY, WILL, BELIEVE, EXPECT, ANTICIPATE, CONTINUE, OR SIMILAR TERMS OR VARIATIONS ON THOSE TERMS, OR THE NEGATIVE OF THOSE TERMS. ACTUAL RESULTS COULD DIFFER MATERIALLY FROM THOSE SET FORTH IN FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS DUE TO A VARIETY OF FACTORS, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THOSE RELATED TO THE ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT, PARTICULARLY IN THE MARKET AREAS IN WHICH THE COMPANY OPERATES, THE FINANCIAL AND SECURITIES MARKETS AND THE AVAILABILITY OF AND COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH SOURCES OF LIQUIDITY, COMPETITIVE PRODUCTS AND PRICING, THE REAL ESTATE MARKET, FISCAL AND MONETARY POLICIES OF THE U.S. GOVERNMENT, CHANGES IN PREVAILING INTEREST RATES, ACQUISITIONS AND THE INTEGRATION OF ACQUIRED BUSINESSES, PERFORMANCE OF RETAIL/CONSUMER MARKETS, DETERIORATION IN CONSUMER CREDIT, CREDIT RISK MANAGEMENT, ASSET/LIABILITY MANAGEMENT, THE IMPACT OF ONGOING LITIGATION, AND THE IMPACT OF THE SETTLEMENT OF THE INVESTIGATION OF THE COMPANYS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER. EXCEPT AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY LAW, THE COMPANY DOES NOT UNDERTAKE, AND SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS ANY OBLIGATION, TO PUBLICLY RELEASE THE RESULTS OF ANY REVISIONS WHICH MAY BE MADE TO ANY FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS TO REFLECT THE OCCURRENCE OF ANTICIPATED OR UNANTICIPATED EVENTS OR CIRCUMSTANCES AFTER THE DATE OF SUCH STATEMENTS.
37
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
Capital Consultants LLC
As the Company has previously disclosed, the Companys former Chief Executive Officer and current Chief Strategic Officer, Andrew Wiederhorn, and former President, Lawrence Mendelsohn, received letters from the United States Attorneys Office for the District of Oregon (USAODO) in March 2001 advising them that they were targets of a grand jury investigation (the CCL Investigation) into the failure of Capital Consultants, L.L.C (CCL). CCL was a lender to Wilshire Credit Corporation (WCC) and related and affiliated companies. WCC was a mortgage loan servicing company owned by Mr. Wiederhorn and Mr. Mendelsohn that provided mortgage loan servicing for Wilshire Financial Services Group Inc., a public company for which Mr. Wiederhorn acted as CEO and Mr. Mendelsohn acted as President and which was principally engaged in banking, loan pool purchasing, and investing in mortgage-backed securities. As a result of the liquidity crisis in the financial markets in the fall of 1998, Wilshire Financial Services Group Inc. experienced significant losses and filed for bankruptcy, which in turn had a significant impact on its affiliates, including WCC, which could not repay the amounts borrowed from CCL. At the time, Wilshire Financial Services Group Inc. owned approximately 8.6% of the Companys common stock and managed the Companys investments under a management agreement.
In August 2002, Mr. Mendelsohn resigned as President and Director of the Company. In November 2003, Mr. Mendelsohn entered into an agreement with the USAODO pursuant to which he pled guilty to filing a false 1998 personal tax return and agreed to cooperate in the CCL Investigation.
On June 3, 2004 the Company announced that Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board Andrew Wiederhorn had entered into a settlement with the USAODO regarding its investigation into CCL (the Settlement) and would take a leave of absence from his corporate positions at the Company.
Under the Settlements terms, Mr. Wiederhorn pled guilty on June 3, 2004 to two federal counts and was sentenced to 18 months incarceration and fined $2.0 million. The first count, a violation of an ERISA provision, involved a federal law that required no criminal intent and for which his reliance on the advice of counsel was not a defense. The second count related to a violation involving a deduction on a personal tax return. The deduction was structured and approved by Mr. Wiederhorns tax advisors and did not reduce Mr. Wiederhorns tax liability or reduce the governments tax collections. The charges to which Mr. Wiederhorn has pled guilty pursuant to the Settlement are not based upon any acts or omission of the Company or of Mr. Wiederhorn in his capacity as an officer or director of the Company.
In entering into Mr. Wiederhorns leave of absence agreement, the Board of Directors considered the nature of the statutes to which Mr. Wiederhorn pled and the fact that he relied on the advice of expert legal counsel and a national accounting firm. The Board also believed it was important to assure Mr. Wiederhorns return to active involvement with the Company because of his expertise and knowledge and to preserve a significant business relationship and the value of the Companys investments.
Under the terms of the leave of absence agreement, Mr. Wiederhorn will continue to receive his regular salary and bonus pursuant to and as set forth in his employment agreement. In addition, in consideration of Mr. Wiederhorns good will, cooperation, and continuing assistance, and in recognition of Mr. Wiederhorns past service to the Company, to help avoid litigation and for the other reasons stated in the agreement, the Company made a leave of absence payment to Mr. Wiederhorn in the amount of $2.0 million on June 2, 2004.
To address the management transition, the Company appointed Donald Berchtold as Co-Chief Executive Officer in June 2004. Mr. Berchtold has been Senior Vice President of Administration at Fog Cutter Capital since October 1999 and became a director in March 2004. He currently sits on the board of directors of Fatburger and has more than 25 years experience in the restaurant business. Mr. Berchtold is the father-in-law of Mr. Wiederhorn. In order to further assist the transition, David Dale-Johnson and Don Coleman will serve as co-Chairmen of the Board. Both Mr. Dale-Johnson and Mr. Coleman have been
38
directors of the Company since October 2001. Mr. Dale-Johnson was the Director of the Real Estate program at USCs Marshall School of Business and has significant expertise in real estate, economics and finance. Mr. Coleman has held prominent executive operating positions in several major companies and is currently the Chief Operating Officer of Eagle Telephonic Inc. The Company also appointed Mr. Dale-Johnson as Chief Investment Officer, adding a new, full-time position to the Fog Cutter Capital management team.
Mr.
Wiederhorn began his leave of absence on August 2, 2004 and is expected to
remain in that status for a period of 14 to 18 months. On August 13, 2004, the Board of
Directors adopted a resolution changing the role of Andrew Wiederhorn from
Co-Chief Executive to Chief Strategic Officer during the leave of absence
period. The Board had discussed this
alternative with
Mr. Wiederhorn prior to the effective date of his leave of absence. The Board determined that during the leave of
absence period,
Mr. Wiederhorn would be in a better position to develop strategies that would
be of future benefit to the Company, while his current status would
significantly limit his ability to perform the full functions of Co-Chief
Executive Officer. All other provisions
of the Leave of Absence Agreement and employment agreement with Mr. Wiederhorn
remain in force. Donald J. Berchtold
will continue as sole Chief Executive Officer and will serve as the principal
executive of the Company.
Mr. Wiederhorn and Mr. Mendelsohn, pursuant to the terms of their respective employment agreements, may have been entitled to indemnity from the Company for litigation expenses and personal losses in connection with the CCL investigations and any related litigation. Messrs. Wiederhorn and Mendelsohn had notified the Company that, although they believed they were entitled to primary indemnification from other sources, they were reserving their rights to seek indemnity from the Company. The Company did not agree to any indemnity requests. Mr. Wiederhorn released the Company from any and all claims he may have had relating to the CCL matter as partial consideration for the leave of absence agreement in June 2004. The USAODO has settled the CCL matter as it relates to both Mr. Wiederhorn and Mr. Mendelsohn. As a result, the Company believes that the contingencies relating to the potential indemnification of these officers or former officers have now been resolved.
Nasdaq Delisting
Effective October 14, 2004, the Companys Common Stock began trading in the over-the-counter market on the OTC pink sheets. Prior to that, the Companys Common Stock was quoted on the Nasdaq National Market. On July 20, 2004, the Company was notified by Nasdaq of a staff determination to delist the Companys Common Stock effective July 29, 2004. The Company challenged the staff determination and requested an oral hearing by a Listing Qualifications Panel to review the staffs conclusions. A hearing was held on September 9, 2004, and, on October 12, 2004, the Company was notified by Nasdaq that the Listing Qualifications Panel upheld the staff determination and the Companys Common Stock was delisted from the Nasdaq National Market on October 14, 2004. The Company has requested a review of the Listing Qualifications Panels decision by Nasdaqs Listing and Hearing Review Council. There can be no assurance that the Companys appeal will be successful.
39
Derivative Action
On July 6, 2004, Jeff Allen McCoon, derivatively on behalf of the Company, filed a lawsuit in the Circuit Court for the State of Oregon (Multnomah County Case No. 0407-06900) which named the Company and all of its directors as defendants. The lawsuit alleges that members of the Companys Board of Directors breached their duties to the Company by entering into the leave of absence agreement with Andrew Wiederhorn. The lawsuit generally seeks restitution of payments made under the leave of absence agreement plus attorney fees and costs. The individual defendants have indemnity agreements with the Company and have asserted the right to indemnification from the Company under those indemnity agreements. This case is in the very early pleading stages and motions are pending against the complaint. The Company may incur expenses under the indemnity agreements and also may derive benefits if the plaintiffs claims are successful. At this stage of the case, it is too early to predict the outcome with any certainty. The complaint is not specific as to the amount of damages it is seeking against the individual defendants, but it appears to seek at least the return of $2 million paid to Mr. Wiederhorn under the Leave of Absence Agreement.
Strouds Acquisition Corporation
On October 6, 2003, the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Strouds Acquisition Corporation (Strouds) filed a lawsuit in the United States Bankruptcy Court (LA 03-23620-ER) which named the Company, among others, as a defendant. The lawsuit was amended on November 10, 2003 and limits the complaint against the Company solely in its capacity as collateral agent for certain secured creditors of Strouds Acquisition Corporation. The lawsuit, as it pertains to the Company, sought reimbursement of the proceeds from approximately $3.0 million in funds received in October 2003, which the Company was holding as collateral agent for other secured creditors. These funds were not included in the assets of the Company, but were being held in trust. On July 1, 2004, the lawsuit was settled and the Company distributed the trust funds, net of legal reimbursements of $0.3 million, in accordance with the settlement agreement. The Company received a general release from the parties and considers the matter closed.
George Elkins Mortgage Banking Company
On August 11,
2004 the Company received a notice from the Class B Holders of Fog Cap GEMB
Holdings LLC (Holdings), a 51% owned subsidiary of the Company which owns
trade names and certain assets relating to the operation of George Elkins
Mortgage Banking Company. The notice was
to inform the Company that the Class B Holders believe that a Change in Control
Transaction (as defined in the Holdings Operating Agreement) has occurred as a
result of the leave of absence of
Mr. Wiederhorn. The notice also
indicates that unless the Change in Control Transaction is corrected within 120
days, the Class B Holders intend to exercise their rights to purchase the Class
A Interests held by the Company in accordance with the formula outlined in the
Operating Agreement.
The Company disputes the claim that a Change in Control Transaction has occurred as a result of the leave of absence agreement with Mr. Wiederhorn. The Company believes that the market value of its investment is greater than the amount of the buyback formula and intends to vigorously defend against these claims. However, if the Company was unsuccessful in defending this position, an analysis of the economic effect of the buyback formula indicates that the Company would not incur a loss on the transaction. As a result, no reserves are required due to the receipt of the notice.
The Company is involved in various other legal proceedings occurring in the ordinary course of business which the Company believes will not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial condition or operations of the Company.
40
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
None.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
Not applicable.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
None
Item 5. Other Information.
Stock Purchase Loans to Officers
Prior
to the passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we had negotiated employment
agreements with senior executives, which allowed these executives to borrow a
specified maximum amount from us to purchase shares of common stock. These loans are full recourse, secured loans
bearing interest at the prime rate. At September 30,
2004, in addition to the $2 million loan to
Mr. Wiederhorn described below, we had outstanding stock purchase loans to Mr.
Wiederhorn including accrued interest, of approximately $1.0 million. The Company is not obligated to make
additional advances on loans under the employment agreements, and all other
loans to executive officers have been paid in full. The remaining outstanding loans are described
in the following section and as follows:
On February 21, 2002, we loaned Mr. Wiederhorn $175,000 to finance the purchase of common stock. This loan is fully recourse to Mr. Wiederhorn and is secured by all of Mr. Wiederhorns rights under his employment agreement. We are entitled to net amounts payable under the employment agreement against any amounts payable by Mr. Wiederhorn upon any default or at maturity of the loan. At Mr. Wiederhorns direction (in accordance with the terms of his employment agreement), on February 21, 2002, we loaned a limited partnership controlled by Mr. Wiederhorns spouse (the LP) $687,000 to finance the purchase of common stock. The loan is secured by the membership interests of two limited liability companies owned by the LP. The limited liability companies each own a parcel of real property in Oregon and have no liabilities. At the time of the loan, the real property had an appraised value of $725,000. The loan is also guaranteed by Mr. Wiederhorn. The common stock purchased with the proceeds of these loans does not serve as security for the loans. The loans are due on February 21, 2007, and bear interest at the prime rate, as published in the Wall Street Journal, which interest is added to the principal annually.
Further information on these loans to Mr. Wiederhorn is included in our annual proxy statement for 2003 and prior years and Mr. Wiederhorns employment agreement has been previously filed with the SEC.
Prior to the passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we had loaned Mr. Wiederhorn $2.0 million. This loan is fully recourse to Mr. Wiederhorn and is secured by trust deeds on two residences located in Oregon. The loan is due on August 1, 2007 and bears interest at 8.5% per annum, payable monthly. The Board of Directors (with Mr. Wiederhorn abstaining) concluded that the terms of the loan were at least as favorable to the Company as would be available in an arms length, third party transaction and approved the loan on July 9, 2002.
41
Fog Cutter Long-Term Vesting Trust
In the fourth quarter of 2000, we established a trust which purchased 525,000 shares of the Companys common stock from an unrelated shareholder. Our contribution to the trust of approximately $1.3 million was included in compensation expense for the year ended December 31, 2000. The trust was established for the benefit of our employees and directors to raise their ownership in the Company, thereby strengthening the mutuality of interests between them and our shareholders. While these shares are held in trust, they will be voted ratably with ballots cast by all other shareholders. In December 2002, using the retained earnings on trust assets, the trust purchased an additional 100,000 shares of our stock in the open market. In addition, during April 2004, the trust again used its retained earnings and purchased 69,500 shares of the Companys stock from a shareholder.
Andrew Wiederhorn, K. Kenneth Kotler and Don H. Coleman are the trustees for the trust. Pursuant to the terms of the trust, as amended, the trustees will, from time to time, allocate the shares to our employees. An employee shall not have any rights with respect to any shares allocated to him unless and until the employee completes five years of continuous service with the Company, commencing with the date the employee is first allocated such shares; provided, however, that such service need not be for a continuous period if so determined by the Company and the Trustees. Upon the employees completion of the vesting period, the trustees shall promptly distribute to such employee the shares allocated to such employee; provided, however, that the trustees may, in lieu of distributing the shares, make a cash payment to the employee equal to the fair market value of the shares allocated to such employee as of the date immediately prior to the date of distribution or distribute any combination of cash or shares, as determined by the trustees, in their sole discretion.
Prior to September 30, 2004, the trustees had allocated 285,500 shares to certain employees and directors. Of this amount, 50,000 shares previously allocated to a former employee were forfeited. During July 2004, the trustees allocated an additional 367,500 shares to certain employees and directors. As a result, 603,000 shares have been allocated to employees and directors and 91,500 shares remain unallocated.
Business Use of Private Aircraft
During the nine months ended September 30, 2004, the Company paid $0.4 million to Peninsula Capital Partners LLC (Peninsula Capital), an entity owned by Mr. Wiederhorn, for the Companys business use of certain private aircraft. The Board of Directors is aware of the relationship and approved the fees for the use of the aircraft. The fee paid is a reimbursement of costs to Peninsula Capital for the Companys use of the aircraft.
Stock Purchase
On April 28, 2004, the Company purchased 330,500 shares of its common stock from Clarence B. Coleman, who at the time was a greater than 10% stockholder. The purchase price was $5.40 per share and the shares were added to treasury stock. At the time of the purchase, the price represented a small premium to the Companys book value per share and market price per share. The Company and its directors considered, among other things, the following factors: (1) the potentially negative impact on the Companys share price if the shares were disposed of publicly; (2) the Companys favorable liquidity position; (3) the potential reduction in the risk that shares are transferred in a transaction which would have an adverse impact on its NOL position; and (4) the reduction in the future expenditure of cash dividends by the Company. The Board of Directors reviewed and approved the transaction to confirm that the transaction was in the best interest of the Company and its other stockholders.
Call Option
On April 27, 2004, the Company purchased an option (the Call Option) to acquire 423,245 shares of the Companys Common Stock from Mr. Wiederhorn, the Companys former Chief Executive Officer and current Chief Strategic Officer during a three year period commencing April 27, 2004, for an exercise price of $3.99 per share. The purchase price for the Call Option was $750,000, resulting in an all-in cost to the
42
Company on exercise of approximately $5.76 per share. The Company and its directors believe that the Call Option gives the Company a useful option to acquire a large block of stock over an extended period. The aggregate price to the Company on exercise of $5.76 per share represented a small premium to the Companys book value per share and market price per share at the time the option was purchased. The price was determined based on arms length negotiations and the Company obtained internal and independent valuations of the Call Option. The Company and its directors also considered the following factors: (1) the potentially negative impact on the Companys share price if the Option Shares were disposed of publicly; (2) the Companys favorable liquidity position; (3) the potential reduction in the risk that shares are transferred in a transaction which would have an adverse impact on its NOL position; and (4) the reduction in the future expenditure of cash dividends by the Company once the Company exercises the Call Option. The Board of Directors reviewed the transaction to confirm that the transaction was in the best interest of the Company and its other stockholders.
Leave of Absence Agreement
On June 3, 2004 the Company announced that former Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board, current Chief Strategic Officer, Andrew Wiederhorn had entered into a settlement with the USAODO regarding its investigation into CCL (the Settlement) and would take a leave of absence from his corporate positions at Fog Cutter Capital.
Under the Settlements terms, Mr. Wiederhorn pled guilty on June 2, 2004 to two federal counts and was sentenced to 18 months incarceration and fined $2.0 million. The first count, a violation of an ERISA provision, involved a federal law that required no criminal intent and for which his reliance on the advice of counsel was not a defense. The second count related to a violation involving a deduction on a personal tax return. The deduction was structured and approved by Mr. Wiederhorns tax advisors and did not reduce Mr. Wiederhorns tax liability or reduce the governments tax collections. The charges to which Mr. Wiederhorn has pled guilty pursuant to the Settlement are not based upon any acts or omission of the Company or of Mr. Wiederhorn in his capacity as an officer or director of the Company.
On June 2, 2004, the Company and Mr. Wiederhorn entered into a leave of absence agreement. In entering into Mr. Wiederhorns leave of absence agreement, the Board of Directors considered the nature of the statutes to which Mr. Wiederhorn pled and the fact that he relied on the advice of expert legal counsel and a national accounting firm. The Board also believed it was important to assure Mr. Wiederhorns return to active involvement with the Company because of his expertise and knowledge and to preserve a significant business relationship and the value of the Companys investments.
Under the terms of the leave of absence agreement, Mr. Wiederhorn will continue to receive his regular salary and bonus pursuant to and as set forth in his employment agreement. In addition, in consideration of Mr. Wiederhorns good will, cooperation, and continuing assistance, and in recognition of Mr. Wiederhorns past service to the Company, to help avoid litigation and for the other reasons stated in the agreement, the Company made a leave of absence payment to Mr. Wiederhorn in the amount of $2.0 million on June 2, 2004.
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K.
(a) Reports on Form 8-K:
A Form 8-K was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by the Company on July 23, 2004 announcing that Ernst & Young LLP would resign as the Companys certifying accountants following the completion of the Companys Form 10-Q for the six months ending June 30, 2004.
A Form 8-K was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by the Company on August 13, 2004 announcing the Nasdaq staff determination to de-list the Company from the Nasdaq Stock Market.
A Form 8-K was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by the Company on September 8, 2004 announcing the appointment of UHY LLP as the Companys certifying accountants.
43
A Form 8-K was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by the Company on September 20, 2004 announcing the annual meeting of the Company to be held on December 8, 2004.
A Form 8-K was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by the Company on October 13, 2004 announcing the decision of the Nasdaq listing panel to de-list the Company from the Nasdaq Stock Market.
(b) Exhibits
See Exhibit Index immediately following the signature page and certifications.
44
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
FOG CUTTER CAPITAL GROUP INC. |
||
|
|
||
|
|
By: /s/ Donald J. Berchtold |
|
|
|
Donald J. Berchtold |
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: /s/ R. Scott Stevenson |
|
|
|
R. Scott Stevenson |
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
Date: November 15, 2004
45
Exhibit Index
2.1 Purchase and Sale Agreement between WREP Islands, Limited and The Aggmore Limited Partnership, dated November 19, 2001, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to a Form 8-K dated November 19, 2001, as previously filed with the SEC on December 4, 2001.
2.2 Loan Option Agreement, by and between the Registrant and entities listed therein, dated January 1, 2002, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Form 8-K dated March 6, 2002, as previously filed with the SEC on March 8, 2002.
2.3 Property Option Agreement, by and between the Registrant and the entities listed therein, dated effective March 6, 2002, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to the Form 8-K dated March 6, 2002, as previously filed with the SEC on March 8, 2002.
2.4 Medium Term Participation Agreement by and among Fog Cap L.P. and participants listed therein, dated March 6, 2002, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.3 to the Form 8-K dated March 6, 2002, as previously filed with the SEC on March 8, 2002.
2.5 Interim Finance and Stock Purchase Agreement, by and between the entities listed therein and the Registrant, dated as of August 15, 2003, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.5 to the Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003, as previously filed with the SEC on November 13, 2003.
2.6 Fatburger Holdings Inc. Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement, by and between the entities listed therein and the Registrant, dated as of January 12, 2004, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.6 to the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, as previously filed with the SEC on March 19, 2004.
2.7 March 2004 Supplemental Agreement, by and between Fatburger Holdings, Inc. and the Registrant, dated as of March 10, 2004, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.7 to the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, as previously filed with the SEC on March 19, 2004.
3.1 Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 1999, as previously filed with the SEC on November 22, 1999.
3.2 Bylaws of the Registrant, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Amendment No. 3 to the Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-39035) on Form S-11, as previously filed with the SEC on March 30, 1998.
4.1 Common Stock Certificate Specimen, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Amendment No. 3 to the Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-39035) on Form S-11, as previously filed with the SEC on March 30, 1998.
4.2 Form of Registration Rights Agreement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to Amendment No. 3 to the Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-39035) on Form S-11, as previously filed with the SEC on March 30, 1998.
4.3 Form of Stock Option Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Amendment No. 3 to the Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-39035) on Form S-11, as previously filed with the SEC on March 30, 1998.
4.4 Long Term Vesting Trust Agreement among the Registrant and Lawrence Mendelsohn, Andrew Wiederhorn and David Egelhoff, dated October 1, 2000, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4
to the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, as previously filed with the SEC on March 3, 2003.
4.5 Waiver, Release, Delegation and Amendment to Stock Option and Voting Agreement among Andrew A. Wiederhorn, Lawrence A. Mendelsohn, Joyce Mendelsohn, Tiffany Wiederhorn, and the Registrant, dated July 31, 2002, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Form 8-K dated August 8, 2002, as previously filed with the SEC on August 15, 2002.
4.6 Summary of Rights to Purchase Shares, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Form 8-K dated October 18, 2002, as previously filed with the SEC on October 18, 2002.
4.7 Rights Agreement dated as of October 18, 2002 between the Registrant and The Bank of New York, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1 to Form 8-A, as previously filed with the SEC on October 29, 2002.
10.1 Deed of Trust, by and among WREP Islands Limited, The Aggmore Limited Partnership and the Registrant and Fog Cap L.P., dated November 19, 2001, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to the Form 8-K dated November 19, 2001, as previously filed with the SEC on December 12, 2001.
10.2 Stock Option Agreement, by and among individuals listed on Schedule 4 thereto, Aggmore Limited Partnership acting through its General Partner, Anglo Irish Equity Limited and the Registrant, dated November 19, 2001, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.3 to the Form 8-K dated November 19, 2001, as previously filed with the SEC on December 4, 2001.
10.3 Amended and restated Employment Agreement between the Registrant and Andrew A. Wiederhorn, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Form 8-K dated August 13, 2003, as previously filed with the SEC on August 13, 2003.
10.4 Amended and restated Employment Agreement, effective as of December 1, 2003, between the Registrant and Robert G. Rosen, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Form 8-K as previously filed with the SEC on February 11, 2004.
10.5 Employment Agreement between the Registrant and R. Scott Stevenson dated as of September 30, 2003, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Form 8-K dated August 13, 2003, as previously filed with the SEC on August 13, 2003.
10.6 Leave of Absence Agreement between the Registrant and Andrew A. Wiederhorn dated as of June 2, 2004, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K dated June 4, 2004, as previously filed with the SEC on June 4, 2004.
11.1 Computation of Per Share Earnings.
31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
99.1 Letter, dated October 28, 1998, from Steven Kapiloff to Andrew Wiederhorn, incorporated by reference to Schedule 99.2 to the Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 1998, as previously filed with the SEC on November 23, 1998.
99.2 Letter dated November 12, 1999 from Arthur Andersen LLP, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Form 8-K dated November 12, 1999, as previously filed with the SEC on November 15, 1999.
99.3 Settlement Agreement, dated as of December 10, 1999 by and between the Registrant, on behalf of itself and all of its subsidiaries and affiliates, Andrew A. Wiederhorn, and Lawrence A. Mendelsohn, and Wilshire Financial Services Group Inc., on behalf of itself and all of its subsidiaries and affiliates, other than First Bank of Beverly Hills, F.S.B., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Form 8-K dated December 13, 1999, as previously filed with the SEC on December 17, 1999.
99.4 Jordan D. Schnitzer Resignation Letter dated March 5, 2002, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 to the Form 8-K dated March 5, 2002, as previously filed with the SEC on March 7, 2002.
99.5 Settlement Agreement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Form 8-K dated May 13, 2002, as previously filed with the SEC on May 14, 2002.
99.6 Lawrence A.
Mendelsohn Resignation Letter dated August 30, 2002, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 1.1 to the
Form 8-K dated August 30, 2002, as previously filed with the SEC on September 3,
2002.
99.7 Robert G. Rosen Resignation Letter dated March 26, 2004, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Form 8-K dated April 1, 2004, as previously filed with the SEC on April 1, 2004.