Back to GetFilings.com



 

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

 

FORM 10-Q

 

(Mark One)

 

ý

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

 

 

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004

 

OR

 

o

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

 

 

For the transition period from                  to                  

 

 

 

Commission File Number: 1-13906

 

BALLANTYNE OF OMAHA, INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Delaware

 

47-0587703

(State or other jurisdiction of
Incorporation or organization)

 

(IRS Employer
Identification Number)

 

4350 McKinley Street, Omaha, Nebraska 68112

(Address of principal executive offices including zip code)

 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:

(402) 453-4444

 

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report.)

 

Indicate by check mark whether Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes ý    No   o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes   o       No   ý

 

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the Registrant’s classes of common stock as of the latest practicable date:

 

Class

 

Outstanding as of October 31, 2004

Common Stock, $.01, par value

 

12,947,329 shares

 

 



 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

PART I. Financial Information

 

Item 1.

 

Financial Statements

 

 

 

Item 2.

 

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition And Results of Operations

 

 

 

Item 3.

 

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

 

 

 

Item 4.

 

Controls and Procedures

 

 

 

PART II. Other Information

 

Item 1.

 

Legal Proceedings

 

 

 

Item 6.

 

Exhibits

 

 

 

 

 

Signatures

 



 

Part I. Financial Information

 

Item 1.  Financial Statements

 

Ballantyne of Omaha, Inc. and Subsidiaries

 

Consolidated Balance Sheets

 

September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003

 

 

 

September 30,
2004

 

December 31,
2003

 

 

 

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets:

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

11,791,160

 

$

8,761,568

 

Accounts receivable (less allowance for doubtful accounts of $419,099 in 2004 and $512,962 in 2003)

 

7,619,460

 

6,698,725

 

Inventories, net

 

14,793,289

 

12,459,852

 

Deferred income taxes

 

1,524,215

 

 

Other current assets

 

528,911

 

963,613

 

Total current assets

 

36,257,035

 

28,883,758

 

Property, plant and equipment, net

 

5,682,008

 

5,794,935

 

Goodwill, net

 

2,467,219

 

2,467,219

 

Intangible assets, net

 

33,554

 

64,073

 

Other assets

 

23,757

 

24,782

 

Total assets

 

$

44,463,573

 

$

37,234,767

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

Current portion of long-term debt

 

$

25,502

 

$

24,253

 

Accounts payable

 

4,123,557

 

3,766,773

 

Warranty reserves

 

756,404

 

732,033

 

Accrued group health insurance claims

 

260,996

 

386,911

 

Customer deposits

 

2,673,077

 

566,434

 

Other accrued expenses

 

2,907,834

 

2,345,133

 

Income tax payable

 

360,670

 

255,835

 

Total current liabilities

 

11,108,040

 

8,077,372

 

Deferred income taxes

 

280,539

 

 

Long-term debt, excluding current installments

 

49,019

 

68,306

 

Stockholders’ equity:

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred stock, par value $.01 per share; Authorized 1,000,000 shares, none outstanding

 

 

 

Common stock, par value $.01 per share; Authorized 25,000,000 shares; issued 14,931,016 shares in 2004 and 14,814,604 shares in 2003

 

149,310

 

148,146

 

Additional paid-in capital

 

31,982,903

 

31,891,630

 

Retained earnings

 

16,209,216

 

12,364,767

 

 

 

48,341,429

 

44,404,543

 

Less 2,097,805 common shares in treasury, at cost

 

(15,315,454

)

(15,315,454

)

Total stockholders’ equity

 

33,025,975

 

29,089,089

 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

 

$

44,463,573

 

$

37,234,767

 

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

1



 

Ballantyne of Omaha, Inc. and Subsidiaries

 

Consolidated Statements of Operations

 

Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004 and 2003

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

Three Months Ended
September 30,

 

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

 

 

 

2004

 

2003

 

2004

 

2003

 

Net revenues

 

$

11,675,514

 

$

9,411,274

 

$

34,630,893

 

$

26,381,245

 

Cost of revenues

 

8,371,203

 

7,227,858

 

24,931,685

 

20,434,461

 

Gross profit

 

3,304,311

 

2,183,416

 

9,699,208

 

5,946,784

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selling and administrative expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selling

 

759,395

 

971,329

 

2,130,827

 

2,535,393

 

Administrative

 

1,204,823

 

898,497

 

3,549,557

 

3,009,553

 

Total selling and administrative expenses

 

1,964,218

 

1,869,826

 

5,680,384

 

5,544,946

 

Income from operations

 

1,340,093

 

313,590

 

4,018,824

 

401,838

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest income

 

38,284

 

32,454

 

76,248

 

75,934

 

Interest expense

 

(8,174

)

(10,475

)

(27,531

)

(28,906

)

Gain on disposal of assets, net

 

109,230

 

 

110,030

 

136,056

 

Other income (expense)

 

(28,888

)

30,654

 

(49,170

)

20,518

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income before income taxes

 

1,450,545

 

366,223

 

4,128,401

 

605,440

 

Income tax benefit (expense)

 

693,594

 

(182,982

)

(283,952

)

(248,834

)

Net income

 

$

2,144,139

 

$

183,241

 

$

3,844,449

 

$

356,606

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic net income per share

 

$

0.17

 

$

0.01

 

$

0.30

 

$

0.03

 

Diluted net income per share

 

$

0.16

 

$

0.01

 

$

0.28

 

$

0.03

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average shares outstanding:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

12,833,211

 

12,643,601

 

12,789,408

 

12,626,196

 

Diluted

 

13,626,594

 

13,216,296

 

13,572,924

 

13,070,305

 

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

2



 

Ballantyne of Omaha, Inc. and Subsidiaries

 

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

 

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004 and 2003

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

2004

 

2003

 

Cash flows from operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

3,844,449

 

$

356,606

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Provision for doubtful accounts

 

19,095

 

(58,543

)

Depreciation of plant and equipment

 

795,230

 

885,230

 

Other amortization

 

30,519

 

30,556

 

Gain on disposal of fixed assets

 

(110,030

)

(136,056

)

Deferred income taxes

 

(1,243,676

)

(168,000

)

Changes in assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts and notes receivable

 

(939,830

)

(446,306

)

Inventories

 

(2,333,437

)

89,187

 

Income taxes

 

128,542

 

1,473,713

 

Other current assets

 

434,702

 

(326,845

)

Other assets

 

1,025

 

(12,499

)

Accounts payable

 

356,784

 

113,486

 

Warranty reserves

 

24,371

 

(542,479

)

Accrued group health insurance claims

 

(125,915

)

(95,384

)

Customer deposits

 

2,106,643

 

 

Other accrued expenses

 

562,701

 

366,225

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

3,551,173

 

1,528,891

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from investing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Capital expenditures

 

(841,352

)

(356,228

)

Proceeds from sale of assets

 

269,079

 

290,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net cash used in investing activities

 

(572,273

)

(66,228

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Payments on long-term debt

 

(18,038

)

(12,926

)

Proceeds from exercise of stock options

 

68,730

 

20,914

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net cash provided by financing activities

 

50,692

 

7,988

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net cash contributed to continuing operations  from discontinued operations

 

 

473,231

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents

 

3,029,592

 

1,943,882

 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

 

8,761,568

 

6,276,011

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

 

$

11,791,160

 

$

8,219,893

 

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

3



 

Ballantyne of Omaha, Inc. and Subsidiaries

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004 and 2003

(Unaudited)

 

1.             Company

 

Ballantyne of Omaha, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Ballantyne” or the “Company”), and its wholly-owned subsidiaries Strong Westrex, Inc. and Design & Manufacturing, Inc., design, develop, manufacture and distribute commercial motion picture equipment, lighting systems and restaurant products. The Company’s products are distributed to movie exhibition companies, sports arenas, auditoriums, amusement parks and special venues, restaurants, supermarkets and convenience stores. Refer to the Business Segment Section (note 11) for further information.

 

2.             Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

 

The principal accounting policies upon which the accompanying consolidated financial statements are based are summarized as follows:

 

a.                                       Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation

 

The consolidated financial statements included herein are presented in accordance with the requirements of Form 10-Q and consequently do not include all of the disclosures normally required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for annual reporting purposes or those made in the Company’s annual Form 10-K filing.  These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Form 10-K for fiscal 2003.

 

In the opinion of management, the unaudited consolidated financial statements of the Company reflect all adjustments of a normal recurring nature necessary to present a fair statement of the financial position and the results of operations and cash flows for the respective interim periods.  The results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of trends or results expected for a full year.

 

b.                                      Use of Estimates

 

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

 

c.                                       Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

 

Accounts receivable are presented net of an allowance for doubtful accounts of $419,099 and $512,962 at September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively. This allowance is developed based on several factors including overall customer credit quality, historical write-off experience and a specific analysis that projects the ultimate collectibility of the account. As such, these factors may change over time causing the reserve level to adjust accordingly.

 

d.                                      Inventories

 

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market and include appropriate elements of material, labor and manufacturing overhead.

 

e.                                       Goodwill and Intangible Assets

 

The Company capitalizes and includes in intangible assets the excess of cost over the fair value of net identifiable assets of operations acquired through purchase transactions (“goodwill”) in accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. SFAS No. 142 requires goodwill no longer be amortized to earnings, but instead be reviewed at least annually for impairment. An impairment loss is recognized to the extent that the carrying amount exceeds the asset’s estimated fair value. All recorded goodwill is attributed to the Company’s theatre segment.

 

4



 

Other intangible assets are stated at cost and amortized on a straight-line basis over the expected periods to be benefited (25 to 36 months).

 

f.                                         Property, Plant and Equipment

 

Significant expenditures for the replacement or expansion of property, plant and equipment are capitalized. Depreciation of property, plant and equipment is provided over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets using the straight-line method. For financial reporting purposes, assets are depreciated over the estimated useful lives of 20 years for buildings and improvements, 3 to 10 years for machinery and equipment, 7 years for furniture and fixtures and 3 years for computers and accessories. The Company generally uses accelerated methods of depreciation for income tax purposes.

 

g.                                      Income Taxes

 

Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carry forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

 

For the nine months ended September 30, 2004, the Company recognized income tax expense of $284,000, as compared to income tax expense of $249,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2003.  During the third quarter of 2004, the Company reversed all valuation allowances against its deferred tax assets as management believes that it is more likely than not that all deferred tax assets will be realized taking into consideration all available evidence including historical pre-tax and taxable income, projected future pre-tax and taxable income and the expected timing of the reversals of existing temporary differences.  The reversal was recorded as an offset against income tax expense in the amount of $1.2 million.

 

h.                                      Revenue Recognition

 

The Company recognizes revenue from product sales upon shipment or delivery of the service to the customer when collectibility is reasonably assured, unless the criteria of EITF 00-21, Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables, require deferral of revenue until receipt of goods by the customer or installation and customer acceptance based on the terms of the sales agreement.

 

The Company enters into transactions that represent multiple element arrangements, which may include a combination of services and asset sales. Multiple element arrangements are assessed to determine whether they can be separated into more than one unit of accounting. A multiple element arrangement is separated into more than one unit of accounting if all of the following criteria are met.

 

                  The delivered item(s) has value on a stand-alone basis

 

                  There is objective and reliable evidence of the fair value of the undelivered item(s)

 

                  If the arrangement includes a general right of return relative to the delivered item(s), delivery or performance of the undelivered item(s) is considered probable and substantially in the control of the Company.

 

If these criteria are not met, then revenue is deferred until such criteria are met or until the period(s) over which the last undelivered element is delivered. If there is objective and reliable evidence of fair value for all units of accounting in an arrangement, the arrangement consideration is allocated to the separate units of accounting based on each unit’s relative fair value. There may be cases, however, in which there is objective and reliable evidence of fair value of the undelivered item(s) but no such evidence for the delivered item(s). In those cases, the residual method is used to allocate the arrangement consideration. Under the residual method, the amount of consideration allocated to the delivered item(s) equals the total arrangement consideration less the aggregate fair value of the undelivered item.

 

5



 

i.                                          Fair Value of Financial Instruments

 

The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount at which the instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties. Cash and cash equivalents, accounts and notes receivable, debt, accounts and notes payable and accrued expenses reported in the consolidated balance sheets equal or approximate their fair values.

 

j.                                          Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

All highly liquid financial instruments with maturities of three months or less from date of purchase are classified as cash equivalents in the consolidated balance sheets and statements of cash flows.

 

k.                                       Income Per Common Share

 

The Company computes and presents net income per share in accordance with SFAS No. 128, Earnings Per Share. Net income per share—basic has been computed on the basis of the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding. Net income per share—diluted has been computed on the basis of the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding after giving effect to potential common shares from dilutive stock options.

 

The following table provides reconciliation between basic and diluted income per share:

 

 

 

Three Months Ended September 30,

 

Nine Months Ended September 30,

 

 

 

2004

 

2003

 

2004

 

2003

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic income per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income applicable to common stock

 

$

2,144,139

 

$

183,241

 

$

3,844,449

 

$

356,606

 

Weighted average common shares outstanding

 

12,833,211

 

12,643,601

 

12,789,408

 

12,626,196

 

Basic income per share

 

$

0.17

 

$

0.01

 

$

0.30

 

$

0.03

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted income per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income applicable to common stock

 

$

2,144,139

 

$

183,241

 

$

3,844,449

 

$

356,606

 

Weighted average common shares outstanding

 

12,833,211

 

12,643,601

 

12,789,408

 

12,626,196

 

Assuming conversion of options outstanding

 

793,383

 

572,695

 

783,516

 

444,109

 

Weighted average common shares outstanding, as adjusted

 

13,626,594

 

13,216,296

 

13,572,924

 

13,070,305

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted income per share

 

$

0.16

 

$

0.01

 

$

0.28

 

$

0.03

 

 

At September 30, 2004, options to purchase 237,925 shares of common stock at a weighted average price of $8.61 per share were outstanding, but were not included in the computation of net income per share—diluted for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 as the options’ exercise price was greater than the average market price of the common shares. These options expire between January 2007 and January 2014.  At September 30, 2003, options to purchase 596,631 shares of common stock at a weighted average price of $5.90 per share were outstanding, but were not included in the computation of net income per share—diluted for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003 as the options’ exercise price was greater than the average market price of the common shares.

 

6



 

l.                                          Stock Based Compensation

 

As permitted under SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and amended by SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation—Transition and Disclosure, the Company elected to account for its stock based compensation plans under the provisions of Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations. Consequently, when both the number of shares and the exercise price is known at the grant date, no compensation expense is recognized for stock options issued to employees and directors unless the exercise price of the option is less than the quoted value of the Company’s common stock at the date of grant. Had compensation cost for the Company’s stock compensation plans been determined consistent with SFAS No. 123 as amended by SFAS No. 148, the Company’s net income and basic and diluted income per share would have been reduced to the pro forma amounts indicated below:

 

`

 

Three Months Ended September 30,

 

Nine Months Ended September 30,

 

 

 

2004

 

2003

 

2004

 

2003

 

Net income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As reported

 

$

2,144,139

 

$

183,241

 

$

3,844,449

 

$

356,606

 

Stock-based compensation (expense) benefit, determined under fair value based method, net of tax

 

3,741

 

(45,202

)

(34,952

)

(142,582

)

Proforma net income

 

$

2,147,880

 

$

138,039

 

$

3,809,497

 

$

214,024

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income per share—basic

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As reported

 

$

0.17

 

$

0.01

 

$

0.30

 

$

0.03

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proforma net income per share

 

$

0.17

 

$

0.01

 

$

0.30

 

$

0.02

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income per share—diluted

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As reported

 

$

0.16

 

$

0.01

 

$

0.28

 

$

0.03

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proforma net income per share

 

$

0.16

 

$

0.01

 

$

0.28

 

$

0.02

 

 

The average fair value of each option granted in 2004 and 2003 was $1.69 and $0.83, respectively. The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model made with the following weighted average assumptions:

 

 

 

2004

 

2003

 

Risk-free interest rate

 

4.01

%

5.11

%

Dividend yield

 

0

%

0

%

Expected volatility

 

37.5

%

72.8

%

Expected life in years

 

3-10

 

3-10

 

 

7



 

m.                                    Long-Lived Assets

 

The Company reviews long-lived assets, exclusive of goodwill, for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds their fair value. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.  The Company’s most significant long-lived assets subject to these periodic assessments of recoverability are property, plant and equipment, which have a net book value of $5.7 million at September 30, 2004 and $5.8 million at December 31, 2003. Because the recoverability of property, plant and equipment is based on estimates of future undiscounted cash flows, these estimates may vary due to a number of factors, some of which may be outside of management’s control. To the extent that the Company is unable to achieve management’s forecasts of future income, it may become necessary to record impairment losses for any excess of the net book value of property, plant and equipment over its fair value.

 

n.                                      Warranty Reserves

 

The Company generally grants a warranty to its customers for a one-year period following the sale of all new equipment, and on selected repaired equipment for a one-year period following the repair. The warranty period is extended under certain circumstances and for certain products. The Company accrues for these costs at the time of sale or repair, when events dictate that additional accruals are necessary.

 

The following table summarizes warranty activity for the periods indicated below:

 

 

 

Three Months Ended
September 30,

 

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

 

 

 

2004

 

2003

 

2004

 

2003

 

Balance at beginning of period

 

$

697,338

 

$

878,188

 

$

732,033

 

$

1,332,173

 

Charged to expense

 

268,654

 

40,515

 

414,824

 

185,679

 

Amounts written off, net

 

(209,588

)

(129,009

)

(390,453

)

(728,158

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at end of period

 

$

756,404

 

$

789,694

 

$

756,404

 

$

789,694

 

 

o.                                      Comprehensive Income

 

The Company’s comprehensive income consists solely of net income. All other items were not material to the consolidated financial statements.

 

p.                                      Litigation

 

Ballantyne is a party to various legal actions that have arisen in the normal course of business.  These actions involve normal business issues such as products liability.

 

During February 2004, Ballantyne settled an asbestos-related lawsuit in a case in the Supreme Court of the State of New York entitled Prager v. A.W. Chesterton Company, et al, including Ballantyne.

 

Ballantyne is also a defendant in two other asbestos cases.  One entitled Bercu v. BICC Cables Corporation, et. al., in the Supreme Court of the State of New York and one entitled Julia Crow, Individually and as Special Administrator of the Estate of Thomas Smith, deceased v. Ballantyne of Omaha, Inc. in Madison County, Illinois.  In both cases, there are numerous defendants including Ballantyne.  At this time, neither case has progressed to a stage where either the likely outcome or the amount of damages, if any for which Ballantyne may be liable can be determined.  An adverse resolution of these matters could have a material effect on the financial position of Ballantyne.

 

During October 2004, the Company’s insurance carrier settled a lawsuit entitled Scott Henry, et al., v. Ballantyne of Omaha, Inc. d/b/a Skytracker of Florida, et al.  Since the lawsuit was covered by insurance, Ballantyne will only pay an immaterial deductible pertaining to the settlement.

 

8



 

Ballantyne currently has a claim for approximately $0.4 million pending against it arising out of the bankruptcy of a customer filed in 2002.  The claim alleges that Ballantyne received preferential payments from the customer during the ninety days before the customer filed for bankruptcy protection.  The claim was brought against Ballantyne in the fourth quarter of 2003.  Ballantyne has recorded an accrual with respect to this contingency in an amount less than the full amount of the claim that represents the best estimate within the range of likely exposure and intends to vigorously defend against the claim.  Given the nature of this claim, it is possible that the ultimate outcome could differ from the recorded amount.

 

q.                                      Environmental

 

The Company is subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations pertaining to environmental protection and the discharge of material into the environment. During 2001, Ballantyne was informed by a neighboring company of likely contaminated soil on certain parcels of land adjacent to Ballantyne’s main manufacturing facility in Omaha, Nebraska. The Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) and the Nebraska Health and Human Services System subsequently determined that certain parcels of Ballantyne property had various levels of contaminated soil relating to a former pesticide company which previously owned the property and that burned down in the 1960’s. During October 2004, Ballantyne agreed to enter into an Administrative Order on Consent (“AOC”) to resolve the matter.  The AOC holds Ballantyne and two other parties jointly and severally responsible for the cleanup.  In this regard, the three parties have also entered into a Site Allocation Agreement by which they will divide past, current and future costs of the EPA, the costs of remediation and the cost of long-term maintenance.  At September 30, 2004, the Company has provided for management’s estimate of the Company’s exposure relating to this matter which is not material to the financial statements.

 

r.                                         Contingencies

 

In October 2003, management identified that an administrative-level employee misappropriated funds from the Company. The actions took place from 1998 through October 2003, when the employee was terminated. As a result of the investigation by the Company’s management and audit committee, the total loss was determined to be approximately $768,000 over the five-year-period. The additional expenses incurred due to the misappropriation of funds were primarily recorded and expensed by the Company as selling expenses in the years when the fraudulent expense claims were submitted by the former employee.  The Company has subsequently recovered $460,000 of the misappropriated funds from insurance and other sources of which $160,000 was received and recorded in 2004.  No other recovery or restitution possibilities exist.

 

s.                       Recently Issued or Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

 

In November 2002, the EITF reached a consensus on Issue No. 00-21, Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables (EITF 00-21).  EITF 00-21 addresses certain aspects of revenue recognition on contracts with multiple deliverable elements.  EITF 00-21 was effective prospectively for new or modified contracts beginning July 1, 2003.  The adoption of EITF 00-21 required the deferral of all revenue on a $2.2 million project in progress at September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003.

 

In December 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) revised SFAS No. 132, Employers’ Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits — an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, and 106.  The Statement revises employers’ disclosures about pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans requiring additional disclosures relating to assets, obligations, cash flows and net periodic benefit costs of defined benefit pension plans and other defined benefit postretirement plans.  The revision did not change the measurement or recognition of those plans required by SFAS No. 87, Employers’ Accounting for Pensions, SFAS No. 88, Employers’ Accounting for Settlements and Curtailments of Defined Benefit Pension Plans and for Termination Benefits, and SFAS No. 106, Employers’ Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions.  The revised Statement is effective for financial statements with fiscal years ended after December 15, 2003.  The interim-period disclosures required by this Statement are effective for interim periods beginning after December 15, 2003.  The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 132 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

 

9



 

In December 2003, the FASB revised FASB Interpretation (FIN) No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities.  FIN No. 46 addresses consolidation by business enterprises of certain variable interest entities.  For public entities that are not small business issuers, the provisions of FIN No. 46 are effective no later than the end of the first reporting period that ends after March 15, 2004.  If the variable interest entity is considered to be a special-purpose entity, FIN No. 46 shall be applied no later than the first reporting period that ends after December 15, 2003.  The adoption of FIN No. 46 did not impact Ballantyne’s consolidated financial statements.

 

In December 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46R (“FIN 46R”), a revision to FIN 46.  FIN 46R clarifies some of the provisions of FIN 46 and exempts certain entities from its requirements.  FIN 46R is effective at the end of the first interim period ending after December 15, 2003.  The Company provided certain disclosures related to its lease obligations in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

 

In December 2003, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104 (“SAB 104”), Revenue Recognition, which supersedes Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101 (“SAB101”), Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements.  The primary purpose of SAB 104 is to rescind accounting guidance contained in SAB 101 related to multiple element revenue arrangements, which was superseded as a result of the issuance of EITF 00-21.  SAB 104 also incorporated certain sections of the SEC’s Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements — Frequently Asked Questions and Answers document.  While the wording of SAB 104 has changed to reflect the issuance of EITF 00-21, the revenue recognition principles of SAB 101 remain largely unchanged by the issuance of SAB 104.  The adoption of SAB 104 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

 

On March 31, 2004, the FASB issued its Exposure Draft No. 1102-100 Share-Based Payment, which is a proposed amendment to FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.  Generally, the approach in the Exposure Draft is similar to the approach described in Statement 123.  However, the Exposure Draft would require all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock option, to be recognized in the income statement based on their fair values.  The FASB expects to issue a final standard late in 2004 that would be effective for public companies for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2004.  The Company is presently studying the Exposure Draft in anticipation of its adoption next year, the impact of which is not known or possible to estimate at this time.

 

In May 2004, the FASB issued Staff Position No. 106-2 (“FSP No. 106-2”), Accounting and Disclosure Requirements Related to the Medicare Prescription Drug Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (“the Act”).  FSP No. 106-2 provides guidance on accounting for the effects of a subsidy available under the Act to companies that sponsor retiree medical programs with drug benefits that are actuarially equivalent to those available under Medicare.  In addition to the direct benefit to a company from qualifying for and receiving the subsidy, the effects would include expected changes in retiree participation rates and changes in estimated health care costs that result from the Act.  FSP No. 106-2 is effective for Ballantyne during the interim period ending September 30, 2004.  The Company believes that its postretirement benefit plan currently provides prescription drug coverage that is at least actuarially equivalent to the new benefit available under Medicare, and it will therefore qualify for the subsidy for an initial period of time after the Act is implemented until actuarial equivalency changes due to existing limits on the Company’s cost of providing the benefit.  The adoption of FSP No. 106-2 is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

In June 2004, the FASB issued Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 02-14 (“EITF 02-14”), Whether an Investor Should Apply the Equity Method of Accounting to Investments Other Than Common Stock.  EITF 02-14 addresses whether the equity method of accounting applies when an investor does not have an investment in voting common stock of an investee but exercises significant influence through other means.  EITF 02-14 states that an investor should only apply the equity method of accounting when it has investments in either common stock or in-substance common stock of a corporation, provided that the investor has the ability to exercise significant influence over the operating and financial policies of the investee.  The accounting provisions of EITF 02-14 are effective for reporting periods beginning after September 15, 2004.  The Company does not expect the adoption of EITF 02-14 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

 

10



 

3.             Intangible Assets

 

Intangible assets consist of the following:

 

 

 

At September 30, 2004

 

 

 

Cost

 

Accumulated
Amortization

 

Net Book Value

 

Nonamortizable intangible assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Goodwill

 

$

3,720,743

 

(1,253,524

)

2,467,219

 

Amortizable intangible assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Customer relationships

 

113,913

 

(82,270

)

31,643

 

Trademarks

 

1,000

 

(1,000

)

 

Non-competition agreement

 

6,882

 

(4,971

)

1,911

 

 

 

$

3,842,538

 

(1,341,765

)

2,500,773

 

 

 

 

At December 31, 2003

 

 

 

Cost

 

Accumulated
Amortization

 

Net Book Value

 

Nonamortizable intangible assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Goodwill

 

$

3,720,743

 

(1,253,524

)

2,467,219

 

Amortizable intangible assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Customer relationships

 

113,913

 

(53,792

)

60,121

 

Trademarks

 

1,000

 

(680

)

320

 

Non-competition agreement

 

6,882

 

(3,250

)

3,632

 

 

 

$

3,842,538

 

(1,311,246

)

2,531,292

 

 

Amortization expense relating to amortizable intangible assets for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 amounted to $10,146 and $30,519, respectively.  Amortization expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003 amounted to $10,189 and $30,556, respectively.  Amortization expense is expected to be $10,066 for the remainder of fiscal 2004 and $23,488 in fiscal 2005.

 

11



 

4.             Inventories

 

Inventories consist of the following:

 

 

 

September 30,
2004

 

December 31,
2003

 

Raw materials and components

 

$

8,980,339

 

$

8,851,894

 

Work in process

 

3,729,897

 

1,751,093

 

Finished goods

 

2,083,053

 

1,856,865

 

 

 

$

14,793,289

 

$

12,459,852

 

 

The inventory balances are net of reserves for slow moving or obsolete inventory of approximately $1,436,000 and $1,157,000 as of September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively.

 

5.             Property, Plant and Equipment

 

Property, plant and equipment include the following:

 

 

 

September 30,
2004

 

December 31,
2003

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Land

 

$

343,500

 

$

343,500

 

Buildings and improvements

 

4,317,812

 

4,558,692

 

Machinery and equipment

 

9,242,559

 

8,788,622

 

Office furniture and fixtures

 

1,894,626

 

1,770,839

 

Construction in process

 

240,115

 

14,639

 

 

 

16,038,612

 

15,476,292

 

Less accumulated depreciation

 

10,356,604

 

9,681,357

 

Net property, plant and equipment

 

$

5,682,008

 

$

5,794,935

 

 

6.             Debt

 

The Company is a party to a revolving credit facility (“credit facility”) with First National Bank of Omaha (“First National Bank”) expiring on August 29, 2005.  The credit facility provides for borrowings up to the lesser of $4.0 million or amounts determined by an asset based lending formula, as defined. Borrowings available under the credit facility amount to $4.0 million at September 30, 2004. No amounts are currently outstanding. The Company pays interest on outstanding amounts equal to the Prime Rate plus 0.25% (4.26% at September 30, 2004) and pays a fee of 0.125% on the unused portion. The credit facility also contains certain restrictive covenants mainly relating to restrictions on acquisitions and dividends with which the Company was compliant at September 30, 2004.  All of the Company’s personal property and stock in its subsidiaries secure this credit facility.

 

Long-term debt at September 30, 2004 consists of installment payments relating to the purchase of certain intangible assets. Future maturities of long-term debt for the remainder of fiscal 2004 and for each of the remaining years are as follows:   2004 - $6,215; 2005 - $25,935; 2006 - $27,762; and 2007 - $14,609.

 

12



 

7.             Supplemental Cash Flow Information

 

Supplemental disclosures to the consolidated statements of cash flows are as follows:

 

 

 

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

 

 

 

2004

 

2003

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest paid

 

$

26,253

 

$

25,072

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income taxes paid

 

$

1,400,101

 

$

3,200

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income taxes benefit related to stock option plans

 

$

23,707

 

$

 

 

8.             Stockholder Rights Plan

 

On May 26, 2000, the Board of Directors of the Company adopted a Stockholder Rights Plan (the “Rights Plan”). Under terms of the Rights Plan, which expires June 9, 2010, the Company declared a distribution of one right for each outstanding share of common stock. The rights become exercisable only if a person or group (other than certain exempt persons, as defined) acquires 15 percent or more of Ballantyne’s common stock or announces a tender offer for 15 percent or more of Ballantyne’s common stock. Under certain circumstances, the Rights Plan allows stockholders, other than the acquiring person or group, to purchase the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of half the market price.

 

9.                                      Self-Insurance

 

The Company is self-insured up to certain stop loss limits for group health insurance. Accruals for claims incurred but not paid as of September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 are included in accrued group health insurance claims in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The Company’s policy is to accrue the employee health benefit accruals based on historical information along with certain assumptions about future events.

 

10.          Postretirement Health Care

 

Ballantyne sponsors a postretirement health care plan (the “Plan”) for certain current and former executives and their spouses.  Ballantyne’s policy is to fund the cost of the Plan as expenses are incurred.  The costs of the postretirement benefits are accrued over the employees’ service lives.

 

In accordance with SFAS No. 132, Disclosures About Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits, the following table sets forth the components of the net period benefit cost for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003:

 

 

 

Three Months Ended
September 30,

 

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

 

 

 

2004

 

2003

 

2004

 

2003

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Service cost

 

$

2,485

 

$

2,146

 

$

7,455

 

$

6,438

 

Interest cost

 

5,559

 

4,908

 

16,677

 

14,724

 

Prior year service cost

 

 

 

 

193,485

 

Amortization of prior-service cost

 

6,718

 

6,718

 

20,154

 

20,154

 

Net periodic benefit cost

 

$

14,762

 

$

13,772

 

$

44,286

 

$

234,801

 

 

13



 

The Company previously disclosed in its financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2003 that it expected to pay $18,000 under the plan in 2004. As of September 30, 2004, benefits of $19,094 have been paid.  The Company presently anticipates paying $25,000 under the plan in 2004.

 

In December 2003, the United States enacted into law the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (the “Act”).  The Act established a prescription drug benefit under Medicare, known as “Medicare Part D” and a federal subsidy to sponsors of retired healthcare benefit plans that provide a benefit that is at least actuarially equivalent to Medicare Part D.

 

In May 2004, the FASB issued Staff Position No. 106-2 (“FSP No. 106-2”), Accounting and Disclosure Requirements Related to the Medicare Prescription Drug Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (“the Act”).  FSP No. 106-2 provides guidance on accounting for the effects of a subsidy available under the Act to companies that sponsor retiree medical programs with drug benefits that are actuarially equivalent to those available under Medicare.  In addition to the direct benefit to a company from qualifying for and receiving the subsidy, the effects would include expected changes in retiree participation rates and changes in estimated health care costs that result from the Act.  FSP No. 106-2 is effective for Ballantyne during the interim period ending September 30, 2004.  The Company believes that its postretirement benefit plan currently provides prescription drug coverage that is at least actuarially equivalent to the new benefit available under Medicare, and it will therefore qualify for the subsidy for an initial period of time after the Act is implemented until actuarial equivalency changes due to existing limits on the Company’s cost of providing the benefit.  The adoption of FSP No. 106-2 is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

11.          Business Segment Information

 

The presentation of segment information reflects the manner in which management organizes segments for making operating decisions and assessing performance.

 

As of September 30, 2004, the Company’s operations are conducted principally through three business segments: Theatre, Lighting and Restaurant.  Theatre operations include the design, manufacture, assembly and sale of motion picture projectors, xenon lamphouses and power supplies, sound systems and the sale of film handling equipment, xenon lamps and lenses for the theatre exhibition industry. The lighting segment operations include the design, manufacture, assembly and sale of follow spotlights, stationary searchlights and computer operated lighting systems for the motion picture production, television, live entertainment, theme park and architectural industries. During January 2003, the Company disposed of its remaining lighting rental operations. The restaurant segment primarily includes the manufacture of replacement parts and the sale of seasonings and marinades.  During the fourth quarter of 2003, the Company made the decision to phase out its restaurant equipment product line, which accounted for $0.8 million in sales or 47% of total segment sales in 2003. Going forward, the Company will continue to supply parts and service to its installed equipment customer base and will also distribute its “Flavor-Crisp” marinade and breading products as well as support its “Chicken-On-The-Run” and “BBQ-On-The-Run” programs. The Company allocates resources to business segments and evaluates the performance of these segments based upon reported segment gross profit. However, certain key operations of a particular segment are tracked on the basis of operating profit. There are no significant intersegment sales. All intersegment transfers are recorded at historical cost.

 

14



 

Summary by Business Segments

 

 

 

Three Months Ended September 30,

 

Nine Months Ended September 30,

 

 

 

2004

 

2003

 

2004

 

2003

 

Net revenue

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Theatre

 

$

10,414,218

 

$

8,033,552

 

$

31,503,673

 

$

22,735,025

 

Lighting

 

988,845

 

944,891

 

2,174,434

 

2,380,948

 

Restaurant

 

272,451

 

432,831

 

952,786

 

1,265,272

 

Total revenue

 

$

11,675,514

 

$

9,411,274

 

$

34,630,893

 

$

26,381,245

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross profit

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Theatre

 

$

2,942,410

 

$

1,875,554

 

$

8,875,006

 

$

5,166,385

 

Lighting

 

275,731

 

198,335

 

583,344

 

535,214

 

Restaurant

 

86,170

 

109,527

 

240,858

 

245,185

 

Total gross profit

 

3,304,311

 

2,183,416

 

9,699,208

 

5,946,784

 

Selling and administrative expenses

 

(1,964,218

)

(1,869,826

)

(5,680,384

)

(5,544,946

)

Operating income

 

1,340,093

 

313,590

 

4,018,824

 

401,838

 

Other income (expense)

 

(28,888

)

30,654

 

(49,170

)

20,518

 

Net interest income

 

30,110

 

21,979

 

48,717

 

47,028

 

Gain on disposal of assets

 

109,230

 

 

110,030

 

136,056

 

Income before income taxes

 

$

1,450,545

 

$

366,223

 

$

4,128,401

 

$

605,440

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Expenditures on capital equipment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Theatre

 

$

311,158

 

$

18,126

 

$

781,827

 

$

301,477

 

Lighting

 

11,106

 

3,365

 

59,525

 

45,163

 

Restaurant

 

 

2,015

 

 

9,588

 

Total

 

$

322,264

 

$

23,506

 

$

841,352

 

$

356,228

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Theatre

 

$

249,680

 

$

262,884

 

$

773,752

 

$

822,051

 

Lighting

 

12,157

 

17,857

 

51,997

 

58,630

 

Restaurant

 

 

10,692

 

 

35,105

 

Total

 

$

261,837

 

$

291,433

 

$

825,749

 

$

915,786

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gain on disposal of long-lived assets and goodwill

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Theatre

 

$

102,628

 

$

 

$

103,428

 

$

 

Lighting

 

6,602

 

 

6,602

 

136,056

 

Restaurant

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

109,230

 

$

 

$

110,030

 

$

136,056

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At September 30, 2004

 

At December 31, 2003

 

Identifiable assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Theatre

 

 

 

 

 

$

40,787,884

 

$

32,924,370

 

Lighting

 

 

 

 

 

3,311,391

 

2,943,804

 

Restaurant

 

 

 

 

 

364,298

 

1,366,593

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

$

44,463,573

 

$

37,234,767

 

 

15



 

Summary by Geographical Area

 

 

 

Three Months Ended September 30,

 

Nine Months Ended September 30,

 

 

 

2004

 

2003

 

2004

 

2003

 

Net revenue

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

United States

 

$

8,817,229

 

$

4,882,363

 

$

25,040,921

 

$

16,030,646

 

Canada

 

160,711

 

147,925

 

529,354

 

691,459

 

Asia

 

947,377

 

1,742,480

 

3,993,511

 

4,116,780

 

Mexico and South America

 

1,414,445

 

1,887,025

 

3,234,129

 

4,014,163

 

Europe

 

329,207

 

751,406

 

1,687,579

 

1,386,489

 

Other

 

6,545

 

75

 

145,399

 

141,708

 

Total

 

$

11,675,514

 

$

9,411,274

 

$

34,630,893

 

$

26,381,245

 

 

 

 

 

 

At September 30, 2004

 

At December 31, 2003

 

Identifiable assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

United States

 

 

 

$

42,763,097

 

$

35,690,521

 

Asia

 

 

 

1,700,476

 

1,544,246

 

Total

 

 

 

$

44,463,573

 

$

37,234,767

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net revenues by business segment are to unaffiliated customers. Net sales by geographical area are based on destination of sales. Identifiable assets by geographical area are based on location of facilities.

 

16



 

Item 2 . Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this document. Management’s discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, including but not limited to, quarterly fluctuations in results; customer demand for the Company’s products; the development of new technology for alternate means of motion picture presentation; domestic and international economic conditions; the achievement of lower costs and expenses; the continued availability of financing in the amounts and on the terms required to support the Company’s future business; credit concerns in the theatre exhibition industry; and other risks detailed from time to time in the Company’s other Securities and Exchange Commission filings. Actual results may differ materially from management’s expectations.

 

Overview

 

The Company has three reportable core operating segments: theatre, lighting and restaurant.

 

From fiscal years 2000 to 2002, the theatre industry experienced an unprecedented three-year decline due to numerous factors, including, but not limited to, over construction of theatres and the lack of operating capital. Several exhibition companies filed for federal bankruptcy protection.  However, during 2003 and continuing in 2004, industry conditions have improved and sales to exhibition companies have increased.  This improvement has led to consolidated revenues increasing $8.2 million or 31.3% in the first nine months of 2004 compared to the same period a year ago.

 

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

 

General

 

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations is based upon the consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and the related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Senior management has discussed the development, selection and disclosure of these estimates with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

 

An accounting policy is deemed to be critical if it requires an accounting estimate to be made based on assumptions about matters that are uncertain at the time the estimate is made, and if different estimates that reasonably could have been used, or changes in the accounting estimates that are reasonably likely to occur periodically, could materially impact the consolidated financial statements.

 

The Company’s accounting policies are discussed in note 2 to the consolidated financial statements in this Form 10-Q. Management believes the following critical accounting policies reflect its more significant estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements.

 

Revenue Recognition

 

The Company normally recognizes revenue upon shipment of goods or delivery of the service to customers when collectibility is reasonably assured. In certain circumstances revenue is not recognized until the goods are received by the customer or upon installation and customer acceptance based on the terms of the sale agreement. During 2003, the Company adopted the provisions of EITF 00-21, Revenue Arrangements With Multiple Deliverables (EITF 00-21). EITF 00-21 addresses certain aspects of revenue recognition on contracts with multiple deliverable elements. The adoption of EITF 00-21 required the deferral of all revenue on a $2.2 million project in process at September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003.  See note 2 to the consolidated financial statements for a full description of the Company’s revenue recognition policy.

 

17



 

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

 

The allowance for doubtful accounts is developed based on several factors including overall customer credit quality, historical write-off experience and a specific account analysis that project the ultimate collectibility of the accounts. As such, these factors may change over time causing the reserve level to adjust accordingly. When it is determined that a customer is unlikely to pay, a charge is recorded to bad debt expense in the consolidated statements of operations and the allowance for doubtful accounts is increased. When it becomes certain the customer cannot pay, the receivable is written off by removing the accounts receivable amount and reducing the allowance for doubtful accounts accordingly.

 

At September 30, 2004, there were approximately $8.0 million in gross outstanding accounts receivable and $0.4 million recorded in the allowance for doubtful accounts to cover potential future customer non-payments. If economic conditions deteriorate significantly or if one of the Company’s large customers were to declare bankruptcy, a larger allowance for doubtful accounts might be necessary. Gross outstanding accounts receivable at December 31, 2003 was $7.2 million and the allowance for doubtful accounts was approximately $0.5 million.

 

Inventory Valuation

 

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market and include appropriate elements of material, labor and overhead. The Company’s policy is to evaluate all inventory quantities for amounts on-hand that are potentially in excess of estimated usage requirements, and to write down any excess quantities to estimated net realizable value. Inherent in the estimates of net realizable values are management’s estimates related to the Company’s future manufacturing schedules, customer demand and the development of digital technology, which could make the Company’s theatre products obsolete, among other items. At September 30, 2004, the Company had recorded gross inventory of approximately $16.2 million and $1.4 million of inventory reserves. This compared to $13.7 million and $1.2 million, respectively, at December 31, 2003. The increase in the reserve relates primarily to specific reserves for discontinued product lines.

 

Warranty

 

The Company’s products must meet certain product quality and performance criteria. The Company relies on historical product claims data to estimate the cost of product warranties at the time revenue is recognized. In determining the accrual for the estimated cost of warranty claims, the Company considers experience with: 1) costs for replacement parts; 2) costs of scrapping defective products; 3) the number of product units subject to warranty claims and 4) other direct costs associated with warranty claims.  In addition to known claims or warranty issues, the Company estimates future claims on recent sales. If the cost to repair a product or the number of products subject to warranty claims is greater than originally estimated, the Company’s accrued cost for warranty claims would increase.  During the third quarter, the Company considered it necessary to increase its warranty reserve to account for a warranty issue with a specific customer in Canada.

 

Long-lived Assets

 

The Company reviews long-lived assets, exclusive of goodwill, for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds their fair value. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.  The Company’s most significant long-lived assets subject to these periodic assessments of recoverability are property, plant and equipment, which had a net book value of $5.7 million at September 30, 2004 and $5.8 million at December 31, 2003. Because the recoverability of property, plant and equipment is based on estimates of future undiscounted cash flows, these estimates may vary due to a number of factors, some of which may be outside of management’s control. To the extent that the Company is unable to achieve management’s forecasts of future income, it may become necessary to record impairment losses for any excess of the net book value of property, plant and equipment over its fair value.

 

Goodwill

 

In accordance with SFAS No. 142, the Company evaluates its goodwill for impairment on an annual basis based on values at the end of the fourth quarter or whenever indicators of impairment exist. The Company has evaluated its goodwill for impairment and has determined that the fair value of the reporting units exceeded their carrying value, so no impairment of goodwill was recognized. Goodwill of approximately $2.5 million is included in the consolidated balance sheets at September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003.  Management’s assumptions about future cash flows for the reporting units require significant judgment and actual cash flows in the future may differ significantly from those forecasted today.

 

18



 

Deferred Income Taxes

 

Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carry forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

 

For the nine months ended September 30, 2004, the Company recognized income tax expense of $284,000, as compared to income tax expense of $249,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2003.  During the third quarter of 2004, the Company reversed all valuation allowances against its deferred tax assets as management believes that it is more likely than not that all deferred tax assets will be realized taking into consideration all available evidence including historical pre-tax and taxable income, projected future pre-tax and taxable income and the expected timing of the reversals of existing temporary differences.  The reversal was recorded as an offset against income tax expense in the amount of $1.2 million.

 

Self-insurance Reserves

 

The Company is partially self-insured for certain employee health benefits. The related liabilities are included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. The Company’s policy is to accrue the liabilities based on historical information along with certain assumptions about future events without regard to the time value of money.

 

Stock-based Compensation

 

The Company accounts for its stock option plans using Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, which results in no charge to earnings when options are issued at fair market value. SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, issued subsequent to APB Opinion No. 25 and amended by SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock Based Compensation—Transition and Disclosure, defines a fair value based method of accounting for employee stock options, but allows companies to continue to measure compensation cost for employee stock options using the intrinsic value based method described in APB Opinion No. 25.

 

The Company has no immediate plans at this time to voluntarily change its accounting policy to the fair value based method; however, the Company continues to evaluate this alternative. In accordance with SFAS No. 148, the Company has been disclosing in the notes to the consolidated financial statements the impact on net income and net income per share had the fair value based method been adopted. If the fair value method had been adopted, net income for the three months ended September 30, 2004 would have been $3,700 higher than reported while net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 would have been $35,000 lower than reported.  Net income for the same periods in 2003 would have been $45,000 and $143,000 lower than reported, respectively.

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

See note 2 to the consolidated financial statements for a full description of recent accounting pronouncements including the respective expected dates of adoption and effects on results of operations and financial condition.

 

19



 

Results of Operations:

 

Three Months Ended September 30, 2004 Compared to the Three Months Ended September 30, 2003

 

Revenues

 

Net revenues in 2004 increased 24.1% to $11.7 million from $9.4 million in 2003 resulting from higher theatre segment revenues as discussed below:

 

 

 

Three Months Ended
September 30,

 

 

 

2004

 

2003

 

Theatre

 

$

10,414,218

 

$

8,033,552

 

Lighting

 

988,845

 

944,891

 

Restaurant

 

272,451

 

432,831

 

Total net revenues

 

$

11,675,514

 

$

9,411,274

 

 

Theatre Segment

 

Sales of theatre products increased 29.6% from $8.0 million in 2003 to $10.4 million in 2004. In particular, sales of projection equipment increased to $7.1 million in 2004 from $6.4 million in 2003 resulting primarily from increased demand domestically as exhibitors are experiencing improved operating results and more access to capital, among other items.  The Company’s top ten theatre customers accounted for approximately 52% of total theatre revenues in 2004 compared to 53% in 2003.

 

Sales of theatre replacement parts increased to $1.9 million in 2004 from $1.3 million in 2003 as sales were positively impacted by more projection equipment in service, higher sales prices and equipment in service aging and requiring more maintenance.

 

Sales of xenon lamps to the theatre exhibition industry increased to $0.9 million in 2004 compared to $0.2 million in 2003 primarily as a result of the Company gaining the business of a large theatre chain coupled with the continuing improvement of the theatre exhibition industry and increased marketing emphasis.

 

Sales of lenses to theatre customers rose to $0.5 million in 2004 from $0.2 million in 2003 resulting from a combination of the improved industry conditions and increased marketing emphasis which has increased the Company’s customer base.

 

Lighting Segment

 

Lighting revenues increased to $1.0 million in 2004 from $0.9 million in 2003 due to selling a group of special lights for $0.2 million.

 

Sales of follow spotlights amounted to $0.4 million in 2004 compared to $0.6 million in 2003 resulting from a general decline in demand, the lack of new arena construction, and increased competition.  The Company is currently marketing new spotlight products and modifying the way it markets and sells its core spotlight product line to address the decline.  Sales of the Skytracker product line were flat at $0.1 million for both 2004 and 2003.  Sales for all other lighting product lines, including, but not limited to, replacement parts, xenon lamps, britelights and nocturns were $0.5 million in 2004 compared to $0.2 million in 2003.  The higher sales primarily resulted from selling twelve MK5 britelights.

 

Restaurant Segment

 

Restaurant sales amounted to approximately $0.3 million in 2004 compared to $0.4 million in 2003.  The Company has lowered selling prices on its restaurant equipment to move them more quickly as the Company is phasing out its unprofitable equipment product line comprised of smokers, ventilation hoods and pressure fryers. These products accounted for revenues of approximately $0.8 million in fiscal 2003 or 47% of total segment sales. Going forward, the Company will continue to supply parts and provide service to its installed equipment customer base. Ballantyne will also continue to distribute its “Flavor Crisp” marinade and breading products as well as support its “Chicken-On-The-Run” and “BBQ-On-The-Run” programs.

 

20



 

Export Revenues

 

Export sales (mainly theatre sales) fell to $2.9 million in 2004 from $4.5 million in 2003, driven primarily by decreased demand in Mexico, Latin America and Asia.  Sales into Mexico are expected to rebound in the fourth quarter.  Export sales are sensitive to worldwide economic and political conditions that can lead to volatility. Additionally, certain areas of the world are more cost conscious than the U.S. market and there are instances where Ballantyne’s products are priced higher than local manufacturers. Additionally, foreign exchange rates and excise taxes sometimes make it difficult to market products overseas at reasonable selling prices.

 

Gross Profit

 

Consolidated gross profit increased to $3.3 million in 2004 from $2.2 million in 2003 and as a percent of revenue increased to 28.3% in 2004 from 23.2% in 2003 due to the reasons discussed below:

 

Gross profit in the theatre segment increased to $2.9 million in 2004 from $1.9 million in 2003 as the Company experienced favorable customer and product mixes coupled with lower manufacturing costs compared to a year ago. The favorable product mix pertains primarily to sales of higher margin replacement parts.  The favorable customer mix resulted from improving margins on certain historically lower margin customers and selling directly to end-users more often, therefore bypassing the distributor’s share of the profit.  Lower manufacturing costs primarily relate to higher sales volume resulting in increased labor productivity and other manufacturing efficiencies.  The Company has also been successful in improving labor productivity through 5-S and Kaizen projects making our personnel more efficient.

 

Gross profit in the lighting segment increased to $0.3 million compared to $0.2 million a year ago, and as a percentage of revenues increased to 27.9% from 21.0% in 2003 primarily due to lower manufacturing costs and higher margin replacement parts being a more significant percent of revenues.

 

The gross margin in the restaurant segment decreased to $86,000 in 2004 from $0.1 million in 2003 but as a percent of revenue rose to 31.6% from 25.3% in 2003.  The gross margin was expected to be volatile in connection with the liquidation of the equipment product line.

 

Selling and Administrative Expenses

 

Selling and administrative expenses amounted to $2.0 million in 2004 compared to $1.9 million in 2003 but as a percent of revenue declined to 16.8% during 2004 from 19.9% in 2003.  The favorable percent stems from covering certain fixed costs with higher revenues during 2004, despite incurring additional costs in 2004 pertaining to compliance with the Sarbanes/Oxley Act of 2002 and costs related to the Company’s new bonus plan.

 

Other Financial Items

 

The Company recorded net interest income of approximately $30,000 in 2004 compared to approximately $22,000 in 2003 as the Company earned interest from higher cash levels and from investing in higher yield commercial paper.  Interest expense was also lower due to negotiating a lower fee on the unused portion of the Company’s revolving credit facility.

 

The Company recorded an income tax benefit in 2004 of approximately $0.7 million compared to income tax expense of $0.2 million in 2003. The results reflect the reversals of certain valuation reserves pertaining to net deferred tax assets in the amount of $1.2 million during 2004.  The effective tax rate for 2004, excluding the valuation allowance reversals, amounted to 37.9% compared to 50.0% in 2003. The decrease primarily results from certain permanent differences between income tax and financial reporting being lower as a percentage of taxable income in 2004.

 

For the reasons outlined herein, the Company earned net income in 2004 of approximately $2.1 million compared to net income of approximately $0.2 million in 2003. Results reflect the income tax benefit of $1.2 million relating to the reversal of the deferred tax valuation allowances discussed earlier.  This translated into net income per share—basic and diluted of $0.17 and $0.16, respectively, per share in 2004 compared to $0.01 per share in 2003.

 

21



 

Results of Operations:

 

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004 Compared to the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003

 

Revenues

 

Net revenues in 2004 increased 31.3% to $34.6 million from $26.4 million in 2003 resulting from higher theatre segment sales as discussed below:

 

 

 

Nine Months Ended September 30,

 

 

 

2004

 

2003

 

Theatre

 

$

31,503,673

 

$

22,735,025

 

Lighting

 

2,174,434

 

2,380,948

 

Restaurant

 

952,786

 

1,265,272

 

Total net revenues

 

$

34,630,893

 

$

26,381,245

 

 

Theatre Segment
 

Sales of theatre products increased 38.6% from $22.7 million in 2003 to $31.5 million in 2004. In particular, sales of projection equipment increased to $21.6 million in 2004 from $16.5 million in 2003 resulting primarily from increased demand domestically as exhibitors are experiencing improved operating results and more access to capital, among other items.  The Company’s top ten theatre customers accounted for approximately 50% of total theatre revenues in 2004 compared to 47% in 2003.

 

Sales of theatre replacement parts increased to $5.6 million in 2004 from $4.2 million in 2003 as sales were positively impacted by more projection equipment in service and equipment in service aging and requiring more maintenance.

 

Sales of xenon lamps to the theatre exhibition industry amounted to $2.8 million in 2004 compared to $0.9 million in 2003 primarily a result of gaining the business of a large theatre chain, the continuing improvement of the theatre exhibition industry and increased marketing of the product line.

 

Sales of lenses to theatre customers rose to $1.5 million in 2004 compared to $1.1 million in 2003 due to increased marketing emphasis and the improvement in the industry in general.

 

Lighting Segment

 

Revenues in the lighting segment decreased to $2.2 million in 2004 from $2.4 million in 2003 as sales of follow spotlights continue to be disappointing.

 

Sales of follow spotlights fell to $0.8 million in 2004 from $1.4 million in 2003 due to a general decline in demand, the lack of new arena construction and increased competition.  The Company is currently marketing new spotlight products and modifying how core spotlight products are marketed and sold to address the decline.  Sales of the Skytracker product line rose to $0.5 million compared to $0.3 million a year ago, due to increased demand in general, and specific sales, such as four Skytrackers sold to the Staples Center in Los Angeles during the first quarter.  Sales of all other lighting product lines, including, but not limited to, replacement parts, xenon lamps, britelights and nocturns, were $0.9 million in 2004 compared to $0.7 million a year ago.  As discussed previously, the increase relates to selling twelve MK5 britelights for approximately $0.2 million during the third quarter of 2004.

 

Restaurant Segment

 

Restaurant sales decreased to $1.0 million in 2004 compared to $1.3 million in 2003 as the Company lowered selling prices on its restaurant equipment to move them more quickly as part of the plan to phase out this unprofitable portion of the segment. Restaurant equipment sales accounted for approximately $0.8 million in fiscal 2003 or 47% of total segment sales. Going forward, the Company will continue to supply parts and provide service to its installed equipment customer base. Ballantyne will also continue to distribute its “Flavor Crisp” marinade and breading products as well as support its “Chicken-On-The-Run” and “BBQ-On-The-Run” programs.

 

22



 

Export Revenues

 

Export sales (mainly theatre sales) amounted to $9.6 million in 2004 compared to $10.4 million in 2003, driven primarily by lower demand in Mexico and Asia.  However, sales into Mexico are expected to improve during the fourth quarter.  Sales into Europe have been higher year-to-date compared to last year; however, sales were soft during the third quarter.  Export sales are sensitive to worldwide economic and political conditions that can lead to volatility. Additionally, certain areas of the world are more cost conscious than the U.S. market and there are instances where Ballantyne’s products are priced higher than local manufacturers making it more difficult to generate sufficient profit to justify selling into certain regions of the world. Additionally, foreign exchange rates and excise taxes sometimes make it difficult to market the Company’s products overseas at reasonable selling prices.

 

Gross Profit

 

Consolidated gross profit increased to $9.7 million in 2004 from $5.9 million in 2003 and as a percent of revenue increased to 28.0% from 22.5% due to the following reasons:

 

Gross profit in the theatre segment increased to $8.9 million in 2004 from $5.2 million in 2003 as the Company experienced favorable customer and product mixes coupled with lower manufacturing costs compared to a year ago. The favorable product mix was due primarily to increased sales of higher margin replacement parts.  The favorable customer mix resulted from improving margins on certain historically lower margin customers and selling directly to end-users more often, therefore bypassing the distributor’s share of the profit.  Lower manufacturing costs primarily relate to higher sales volume resulting in increased labor productivity and other manufacturing efficiencies.  The Company has also been successful in improving labor productivity through 5-S and Kaizen projects making our personnel more efficient.

 

Gross profit in the lighting segment increased to $0.6 million from $0.5 million in 2003 and as a percentage of revenues rose to 26.8% from 22.5% in 2003 primarily due to lower manufacturing costs and replacement parts, which carry a higher margin, being a higher percent of revenues.

 

The gross margin in the restaurant segment was flat at $0.2 million for both 2004 and 2003.

 

Selling and Administrative Expenses

 

Selling and administrative expenses rose to $5.7 million in 2004 from $5.5 million in 2003, but as a percent of revenue declined to 16.4% from 21.0% stemming from covering certain fixed costs with higher revenues during 2004, despite incurring additional costs in 2004 pertaining to the Sarbanes/Oxley Act of 2002 and costs related to the Company’s new bonus plan.

 

Other Financial Items

 

The Company recorded net interest income of approximately $49,000 in 2004 compared to approximately $47,000 in 2003 as the Company earned interest from higher cash levels and from investing in higher yield commercial paper.  Interest expense was also lower due to negotiating a lower fee on the unused portion of the Company’s revolving credit facility.

 

During the third quarter, the Company received and recorded insurance proceeds of $0.3 million pertaining to damage to the Omaha plant’s roof, resulting in a net gain on disposal of the old roof of $110,000. The gain of $136,000 recorded during 2003 resulted from the Company divesting its remaining rental operations of the lighting segment during the first quarter of that year.

 

The Company recorded income tax expense in 2004 of approximately $0.3 million compared to $0.2 million in 2003. The 2004 amount reflects reversals of certain deferred tax asset valuation reserves resulting in a credit to income tax expense in the amount of $1.2 million.  The effective tax rate for 2004, excluding the valuation reserve reversals, amounted to 37.0% compared to 41.0% in 2003.  The decrease in the effective tax rate results from certain permanent differences between income tax and financial reporting being lower as a percentage of taxable income during 2004.

 

For the reasons outlined herein, the Company earned net income in 2004 of $3.8 million compared to $0.4 million in 2003.  Results reflect the income tax benefit of $1.2 million relating to the reversal of deferred tax valuation allowances discussed above.  This translated into net income per share—basic and diluted of $0.30 and $0.28, respectively, per share in 2004 compared to $0.03 per share in 2003.

 

23



 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

The Company is a party to a revolving credit facility with First National Bank of Omaha expiring on August 29, 2005.  The credit facility provides for borrowings up to the lesser of $4.0 million or amounts determined by an asset based lending formula, as defined. Borrowings available under the credit facility amount to $4.0 million at September 30, 2004. No amounts are currently outstanding. The Company pays interest on outstanding amounts equal to the Prime Rate plus 0.25% (6.26% at September 30, 2004) and pays a fee of 0.125% on the unused portion. The credit facility also contains certain restrictive covenants mainly relating to restrictions on acquisitions and dividends with which the Company was compliant at September 30, 2004.  All of the Company’s personal property and stock in its subsidiaries secure this credit facility.

 

Long-term debt at September 30, 2004 consists of installment payments relating to the purchase of certain intangible assets. Future maturities of long-term debt for the remainder of fiscal 2004 and for each of the remaining years are as follows: 2004 - $6,215; 2005 - $25,935; 2006 - $27,762; and 2007 - $14,609.

 

Net cash provided by operating activities increased to $3.6 million compared to $1.5 million in 2003, despite a $1.1 million usage of operating cash in the third quarter of 2004, primarily as a result of customer deposits and more operating income.  The impact of the customer deposits resulted primarily from the receipt of 90%, or $1.9 million, relating to a job to be completed in China later this year.  This receipt has been recorded as a liability in the accompanying balance sheets. The results for the third quarter primarily reflect the build-up of inventory during the quarter pertaining to ramping up inventory purchases and production for strong October and November sales and certain problems regarding the implementation of a new inventory bin system.  Inventory levels are expected to drop in the fourth quarter when the job in China bills, October and November orders are shipped and the initial problems with the new inventory bin system are worked out.

 

Net cash used in investing activities was $0.6 million in 2004 compared to approximately $66,000 in 2003.  During the third quarter, the Company received and recorded insurance proceeds of $0.3 million pertaining to damage to the Omaha plant’s roof. Capital expenditures amounted to approximately $0.8 million in 2004 due to purchasing a new machining center and replacing the Omaha plant’s roof. During 2003, the Company received proceeds of $0.3 million relating to the sale of rental operations in Florida and Georgia, however, the Company purchased $0.4 million of capital expenditures accounting for the net usage from investing activities in 2003.  The increase in capital expenditures from 2003 related to purchasing certain equipment to meet sales volume and replacing the roof at the Omaha plant.

 

Net cash provided by financing activities was approximately $51,000 in 2004 compared to $8,000 a year ago.  During 2004, the Company paid $18,000 in debt payments and received $69,000 of proceeds from stock option exercises.  During 2003, the Company paid $13,000 in debt payments and received $21,000 in proceeds from stock option exercises.  The debt payments for both years are the result of a 2002 acquisition.

 

The Company believes its current cash balances and credit facility, coupled with cash generated from operations, will meet its expected working and other capital requirements.  However, in the event that the need for additional cash arises such as for acquisitions or R&D opportunities, it may be necessary to raise funds from other sources including possible debt and equity issuances.

 

Transactions with Related and Certain Other Parties

 

The Company had no significant transactions with related and certain other parties during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004.

 

Concentrations

 

The Company’s top ten customers accounted for approximately 46% of consolidated net revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2004. These customers were all from the theatre segment. Trade accounts receivable from these customers represented approximately 52% of net consolidated receivables at September 30, 2004. Additionally, sales to AMC Entertainment, Inc. (“AMC”) and National Cinema Supply (“NCS”) represented 10.5% and 10.7%, respectively of consolidated sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2004.  Accounts receivable from AMC amounted to $155,000 or 2% of consolidated accounts receivable while receivables from NCS amounted to $1.2 million or 16% of consolidated accounts receivable.  While the Company believes its relationships with these and other significant customers are stable, most arrangements are made by purchase order and are terminable at will by either party. A significant decrease or interruption in business from the Company’s significant customers could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations. The Company could also be adversely affected by such factors as changes in foreign currency rates and weak economic and political conditions in each of the countries in which the Company sells its products.

 

24



 

Financial instruments that potentially expose the Company to a concentration of credit risk principally consist of accounts receivable.  While the health of the theatre exhibition industry is improving, there are still risks in the industry which result in continued exposure to the Company.  This exposure is in the form of receivables from independent dealers who resell the Company’s products to certain exhibitors and also a concentration of sales and credit risk.  In many instances, the Company sells theatre products through independent dealers who resell to the exhibitor.  These dealers were negatively impacted by the recent downturn in the industry and while the exhibitors are recovering, it has not benefited the dealer network as quickly.  The Company sells product to a large number of customers in many different geographic regions. To minimize credit concentration risk, the Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers’ financial condition or uses letters of credit.

 

Increased competition also results in continued exposure to the Company. If the Company loses market share or encounters more competition relating to the development of new technology for alternate means of motion picture presentation such as digital technology, the Company may be unable to lower its cost structure quickly enough to offset the lost revenue. To counter these risks, the Company has initiated a cost reduction program, continues to streamline its manufacturing processes and is formulating a strategy to respond to the digital marketplace. The Company also is focusing on a growth and diversification strategy to find alternative product lines to become less dependent on the theatre exhibition industry. However, no assurances can be given that this strategy will succeed or that the Company will be able to obtain adequate financing to take advantage of potential opportunities.

 

The principal raw materials and components used in the Company’s manufacturing processes include aluminum, electronic subassemblies and sheet metal. The Company utilizes a single contract manufacturer for each of its intermittent movement components, lenses and xenon lamps for its commercial motion picture projection equipment.  Although the Company has not to-date experienced significant difficulty in obtaining these components, no assurance can be given that shortages will not arise in the future. The loss of any one or more of such contract manufacturers could have a short-term adverse effect on the Company until alternative manufacturing arrangements were secured. The Company is not dependent upon any one contract manufacturer or supplier for the balance of its raw materials and components. The Company believes that there are adequate alternative sources of such raw materials and components of sufficient quantity and quality.

 

Hedging and Trading Activities

 

The Company does not engage in any hedging activities, including currency-hedging activities, in connection with its foreign operations and sales. To date, all of the Company’s international sales have been denominated in U.S. dollars, exclusive of Strong Westrex, Inc. sales, which are denominated in Hong Kong dollars. In addition, the Company does not have any trading activities that include non-exchange traded contracts at fair value.

 

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations

 

The Company’s off balance sheet arrangements consist principally of leasing various assets under operating leases. The future estimated payments under these arrangements are summarized below along with the Company’s contractual obligations:

 

 

 

 

Payments Due by Period

 

Contractual Obligations

 

Total

 

Remaining
in 2004

 

Thereafter

 

Long-term debt

 

$

74,521

 

6,215

 

68,306

 

Operating leases

 

267,261

 

45,046

 

222,215

 

Less sublease receipts

 

(145,507

)

(21,826

)

(123,681

)

Net contractual cash obligations

 

$

196,275

 

29,435

 

166,840

 

 

There are no other contractual obligations other than inventory and property, plant and equipment purchases in the ordinary course of business.

 

Seasonality

 

Generally, the Company’s business exhibits a moderate level of seasonality as sales of theatre products typically increase during the third and fourth quarters. The Company believes that such increased sales reflect seasonal increases in the construction of new motion picture screens in anticipation of the holiday movie season.

 

25



 

Environmental and Legal

 

See note 2 to the consolidated financial statements for a full description of all environmental and legal matters.

 

Inflation

 

The Company believes that the relatively moderate rates of inflation in recent years have not had a significant impact on its net revenues or profitability. Historically, the Company has been able to offset any inflationary effects by either increasing prices or improving cost efficiencies.

 

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

 

The Company markets its products throughout the United States and the world.  As a result, the Company could be adversely affected by such factors as changes in foreign currency rates and weak economic conditions.  In particular, the Company was impacted by the recent downturn in the North American theatre exhibition industry in the form of lost revenues and bad debts.  Additionally, as a majority of sales are currently denominated in U.S. dollars, a strengthening of the dollar can and sometimes has made the Company’s products less competitive in foreign markets.  As stated above, the majority of the Company’s foreign sales are denominated in U.S. dollars except for its subsidiary in Hong Kong.  The Company purchases the majority of its lenses from a German manufacturer.  The strengthening of the Euro compared to the U.S. dollar has made these purchases more expensive.

 

The Company has also evaluated its exposure to fluctuations in interest rates.  If the Company would be able to borrow up to the maximum amount available under its variable interest rate credit facility, a one percent increase in the interest rate would increase interest expense by $40,000 per annum.

 

The Company has not historically and is not currently using derivative instruments to manage the above risks.

 

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

 

The Company carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-15. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures provide reasonable assurance that such disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely providing them with material information relating to the Company (including its consolidated subsidiaries) required to be included in the Company’s periodic Securities and Exchange Commission filings. There have been no significant changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting for the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, such internal controls.

 

26



 

PART II Other Information

 

Item 1.  Legal Proceedings

 

A review of the Company’s current litigation is disclosed in note 2 to the consolidated financial statements.

 

Item 6. Exhibits

 

a.  Exhibits (Numbered in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K):

 

3.1

 

Certificate of Incorporation as amended through July 20, 1995 (incorporated by reference to Exhibits 3.1 and 3.3 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 33-93244) (the “Form S-1”).

3.1.1

 

Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1.1 to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1997).

3.2

 

Bylaws of the Company as amended through August 24, 1995 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Form S-1).

3.2.1

 

First Amendment to Bylaws of the Company dated December 12, 2001 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2.1 to the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001).

3.3

 

Stockholder Rights Agreement dated May 25, 2000 between the Company and Mellon Investor Services L.L.C. (formerly ChaseMellon Shareholder Services, L.L.C.) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1 to the Form 8-A12B as filed on May 26, 2000).

3.3.1

 

First Amendment dated April 30, 2001 to Rights Agreement dated as of May 25, 2000 between the Company and Mellon Investor Services, L.L.C., as Rights Agent (incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K as filed on May 7, 2001).

3.3.2

 

Second Amendment dated July 25, 2001 to Rights Agreement dated as of May 25, 2000 between the Company and Mellon Investor Services, L.L.C., as Rights Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3.2 to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2001).

3.3.3

 

Third Amendment dated October 2, 2001 to Rights Agreement dated as of May 25, 2000 between the Company and Mellon Investor Services, L.L.C., as Rights Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3.3 to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2001).

4.2.2

 

Third Amendment to Revolving Credit Agreement dated August 30, 2004 between the Company and First National Bank of Omaha, Inc. *

10.6

 

Ballantyne of Omaha, Inc. Executive Officers Performance Bonus Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004).

31.1

 

Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer. *

31.2

 

Section 302 Certification of Chief Financial Officer. *

32.1

 

18 U.S.C. Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer. *

32.2

 

18 U.S.C. Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer. *

 


* - - Filed herewith

 

27



 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

BALLANTYNE OF OMAHA, INC.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

By:

/s/  JOHN WILMERS

 

By:

/s/  BRAD FRENCH

 

 

John Wilmers, President,
Chief Executive Officer, and Director

 

Brad French, Secretary/Treasurer and
Chief Financial Officer

Date:   November 11, 2004

Date:   November 11, 2004

 

28