SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One) |
||
ý |
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004
OR
o |
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF |
Commission File Number 001-16785
American Spectrum Realty, Inc.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
State of Maryland |
|
52-2258674 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
5850 San Felipe, Suite 450 Houston, Texas 77057 |
|
77057 |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
|
|
|
(713) 706-6200
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No ý
As of November 9, 2004 1,569,890 shares of Common Stock ($.01 par value) were outstanding.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AMERICAN SPECTRUM REALTY, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
ASSETS |
|
September 30, 2004 |
|
December 31, 2003 |
|
|||
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Real estate held for investment |
|
$ |
192,193 |
|
$ |
186,208 |
|
|
Accumulated depreciation |
|
25,055 |
|
17,668 |
|
|||
Real estate held for investment, net |
|
167,138 |
|
168,540 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Real estate held for sale |
|
|
|
14,574 |
|
|||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
2,007 |
|
2,937 |
|
|||
Tenant and other receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $202 and $352, respectively (including $244 and $271, respectively, from related party) |
|
466 |
|
420 |
|
|||
Mortgage loan receivable, net of discount of $83 at December 31, 2003 |
|
|
|
1,667 |
|
|||
Deferred rents receivable |
|
1,488 |
|
1,045 |
|
|||
Insurance proceeds receivable litigation settlement |
|
|
|
6,500 |
|
|||
Deposit held in escrow |
|
1,365 |
|
|
|
|||
Investment in management company |
|
4,000 |
|
4,000 |
|
|||
Prepaid and other assets, net |
|
10,453 |
|
8,320 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Total Assets |
|
$ |
186,917 |
|
$ |
208,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Notes payable, net of premiums of $2,603 and $3,089, respectively |
|
$ |
146,784 |
|
$ |
143,742 |
|
|
Notes payable, litigation settlement |
|
9,750 |
|
9,750 |
|
|||
Liabilities related to real estate held for sale |
|
|
|
8,018 |
|
|||
Accounts payable |
|
2,345 |
|
2,048 |
|
|||
Deferred tax liability |
|
4,316 |
|
4,316 |
|
|||
Litigation settlement payable |
|
|
|
6,500 |
|
|||
Accrued and other liabilities (including $437 and $579, respectively, to related parties) |
|
6,810 |
|
5,885 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Total Liabilities |
|
170,005 |
|
180,259 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Minority Interest |
|
5,527 |
|
7,009 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Commitments and Contingencies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Redeemable Common Stock |
|
300 |
|
300 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Stockholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; authorized, 25,000,000 shares, none issued and outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Common stock, $.01 par value; authorized, 100,000,000 shares; issued, 1,592,710 and 1,578,224 shares, respectively |
|
16 |
|
16 |
|
|||
Additional paid-in capital |
|
45,905 |
|
45,742 |
|
|||
Accumulated deficit |
|
(33,232 |
) |
(23,516 |
) |
|||
Receivable from principal stockholders |
|
(1,071 |
) |
(1,191 |
) |
|||
Deferred compensation |
|
(73 |
) |
(195 |
) |
|||
Treasury stock, at cost, 24,032 and 22,782 share, respectively |
|
(460 |
) |
(421 |
) |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Total Stockholders Equity |
|
11,085 |
|
20,435 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
$ |
186,917 |
|
$ |
208,003 |
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
3
AMERICAN SPECTRUM REALTY, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
||||||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||||
REVENUES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Rental revenue |
|
$ |
6,520 |
|
$ |
5,734 |
|
$ |
20,006 |
|
$ |
17,475 |
|
Interest and other income |
|
49 |
|
34 |
|
211 |
|
77 |
|
||||
Total revenues |
|
6,569 |
|
5,768 |
|
20,217 |
|
17,552 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Property operating expense |
|
2,758 |
|
2,578 |
|
7,851 |
|
7,054 |
|
||||
General and administrative |
|
1,243 |
|
1,650 |
|
3,551 |
|
4,952 |
|
||||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
2,606 |
|
2,212 |
|
7,735 |
|
6,397 |
|
||||
Interest expense |
|
3,139 |
|
2,452 |
|
8,998 |
|
7,456 |
|
||||
Total expenses |
|
9,746 |
|
8,892 |
|
28,135 |
|
25,859 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
OTHER LOSS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
(214 |
) |
|
|
(827 |
) |
|
|
||||
Total other loss |
|
(214 |
) |
|
|
(827 |
) |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net loss before minority interest and discontinued operations |
|
(3,391 |
) |
(3,124 |
) |
(8,745 |
) |
(8,307 |
) |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Minority interest |
|
704 |
|
930 |
|
1,390 |
|
1,845 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net loss before discontinued operations |
|
(2,687 |
) |
(2,194 |
) |
(7,355 |
) |
(6,462 |
) |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Discontinued operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations |
|
25 |
|
(443 |
) |
(63 |
) |
(1,074 |
) |
||||
(Loss) gain on sale of discontinued operations |
|
(2,298 |
) |
51 |
|
(2,298 |
) |
2,279 |
|
||||
Impairment of real estate assets held for sale |
|
|
|
(3,500 |
) |
|
|
(7,500 |
) |
||||
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
(2,273 |
) |
(3,892 |
) |
(2,361 |
) |
(6,295 |
) |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net loss |
|
$ |
(4,960 |
) |
$ |
(6,086 |
) |
$ |
(9,716 |
) |
$ |
(12,757 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Basic and diluted per share data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net loss before discontinued operations |
|
$ |
(1.72 |
) |
$ |
(1.43 |
) |
$ |
(4.72 |
) |
$ |
(4.41 |
) |
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
(1.45 |
) |
(2.54 |
) |
(1.51 |
) |
(4.29 |
) |
||||
Net loss |
|
$ |
(3.17 |
) |
$ |
(3.98 |
) |
$ |
(6.23 |
) |
$ |
(8.70 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Basic weighted average shares used |
|
1,564,885 |
|
1,529,702 |
|
1,558,859 |
|
1,465,849 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
4
AMERICAN SPECTRUM REALTY INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(Dollars in thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
Common Stock |
|
Additional Paid-In Capital |
|
Accumulated Deficit |
|
Deferred Compensation |
|
Treasury Stock |
|
Receivable from Principal Stockholders |
|
Total Equity |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2003 |
|
$ |
16 |
|
$ |
45,742 |
|
$ |
(23,516) |
|
$ |
(195) |
|
$ |
(421) |
|
$ |
(1,191) |
|
$ |
20,435 |
|
||||
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71 |
|
|||||||||||
Conversion of operating partnership units to common stock |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92 |
|
|||||||||||
Restricted stock forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Amortization of deferred compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
|
|
83 |
|
|||||||||||
Payment on receivable from principal stockholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120 |
|
120 |
|
|||||||||||
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
(9,716 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,716 |
) |
|||||||||||
Balance, September 30, 2004 |
|
$ |
16 |
|
$ |
45,905 |
|
$ |
(33,232 |
) |
$ |
(73 |
) |
$ |
(460 |
) |
$ |
(1,071 |
) |
$ |
11,085 |
|
||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
5
AMERICAN SPECTRUM REALTY, INC
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollars in thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net loss |
|
$ |
(9,716 |
) |
$ |
(12,757 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
2,361 |
|
6,295 |
|
||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
7,735 |
|
6,397 |
|
||
Deferred rental income |
|
(447 |
) |
(305 |
) |
||
Minority interest |
|
(1,390 |
) |
(1,845 |
) |
||
Deferred compensation expense |
|
83 |
|
233 |
|
||
Mark to market adjustments on interest rate protection agreements |
|
(65 |
) |
202 |
|
||
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
827 |
|
|
|
||
Interest on receivable from principal stockholders |
|
(50 |
) |
(39 |
) |
||
Amortization of note payable premiums, included in interest expense |
|
(411 |
) |
(384 |
) |
||
Amortization of note receivable discount, included in interest income |
|
(58 |
) |
|
|
||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
(Increase) decrease in tenant and other receivables |
|
(129 |
) |
64 |
|
||
Decrease (increase) in accounts payable |
|
297 |
|
(62 |
) |
||
Increase in prepaid and other assets |
|
(2,692 |
) |
(1,820 |
) |
||
Increase (decrease) in accrued and other liabilities |
|
1,379 |
|
(305 |
) |
||
Net cash used in operating activities: |
|
(2,276 |
) |
(4,326 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Proceeds received from sales of real estate assets |
|
9,992 |
|
32,283 |
|
||
Capital improvements to real estate assets |
|
(3,929 |
) |
(2,824 |
) |
||
Collections on mortgage loan receivable |
|
28 |
|
|
|
||
Real estate acquisitions |
|
(138 |
) |
(281 |
) |
||
Net cash provided by investing activities: |
|
5,953 |
|
29,178 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Proceeds from borrowings refinances |
|
18,750 |
|
1,340 |
|
||
Proceeds from borrowings other |
|
458 |
|
758 |
|
||
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
|
250 |
|
||
Repurchase of common stock |
|
|
|
(69 |
) |
||
Note payments on litigation settlement |
|
|
|
(250 |
) |
||
Acquisition of minority interest in operating partnership |
|
|
|
(223 |
) |
||
Repayment of borrowings property sales |
|
(7,041 |
) |
(20,947 |
) |
||
Repayment of borrowings refinances |
|
(14,620 |
) |
(1,300 |
) |
||
Repayment of borrowings scheduled payments |
|
(2,063 |
) |
(3,198 |
) |
||
Net cash used in financing activities: |
|
(4,516 |
) |
(23,639 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash from discontinued operations |
|
(91 |
) |
1,463 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
(Decrease) increase in cash |
|
(930 |
) |
2,676 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash, beginning of period |
|
2,937 |
|
788 |
|
||
Cash, end of period |
|
$ |
2,007 |
|
$ |
3,464 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash paid for interest |
|
$ |
8,788 |
|
$ |
10,114 |
|
Cash paid for income taxes |
|
25 |
|
17 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Assumptions of mortgage loans in acquisition of real estate assets |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
6,077 |
|
Note receivable settled through acquisition of real estate asset |
|
1,722 |
|
|
|
||
Deposit held in escrow for acquisition of real estate asset |
|
1,365 |
|
|
|
||
Financing settled through divestitures |
|
|
|
16,885 |
|
||
Conversion of debt to related parties into common stock |
|
|
|
2,131 |
|
||
Conversion of operating partnership units into common stock |
|
92 |
|
232 |
|
||
Issuance of common stock in acquisition of real estate asset |
|
71 |
|
|
|
||
Issuance of operating partnership units in acquisition of real estate assets |
|
|
|
1,010 |
|
||
Receivable from related party regarding certain issues asserted by principal shareholder |
|
|
|
270 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
6
AMERICAN SPECTRUM REALTY, INC.
NOTE 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
American Spectrum Realty, Inc. (ASR or the Company) is a Maryland corporation established on August 8, 2000. The Company is a full-service real estate corporation, which owns, manages and operates income-producing properties. Substantially all of the Companys assets are held through an operating partnership (the Operating Partnership) in which the Company, as of September 30, 2004, held the sole general partner interest of .87% and a limited partnership interest totaling 86.83%. As of September 30, 2004, through its majority-owned subsidiary, the Operating Partnership, the Company owned and operated 24 properties, which consisted of 17 office buildings, four industrial properties, two shopping centers and one apartment complex. The 24 properties are located in seven states. In October 2004, the Company acquired an additional office building located in Houston, Texas consisting of 81,587 rentable square feet.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2004, the Company sold three properties, which consisted of one office building, one industrial property and a parcel of undeveloped land, and acquired one office building in Houston, Texas. During 2003, the Company sold eleven properties, which consisted of two apartment complexes, two office buildings, six industrial properties and one shopping center, and acquired four office buildings in Houston, Texas. During 2002, the Company sold two shopping center properties and one apartment property, and purchased three office properties in the Houston area. The property sales are part of the Companys strategy to sell its non-core property types apartment and shopping center properties and to sell its properties located in the Midwest and Carolinas, its non-core markets. The Company intends to focus primarily on office and industrial properties located in Texas, California and Arizona.
The Company is the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership. As the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership, the Company generally has the exclusive power to manage and conduct the business of the Operating Partnership under its partnership agreement. The Companys interest as a limited partner in the Operating Partnership entitles it to share in any cash distributions from, and in profits and losses of, the Operating Partnership. If the Company receives any distributions from the Operating Partnership, it intends, in turn, pay dividends to its common stockholders so that the amount of dividends paid on each share of common stock equals four times the amount of distributions paid on each limited partnership unit in the Operating Partnership (OP Unit). Most of the properties are owned by the Operating Partnership through subsidiary limited partnerships or limited liability companies.
Holders of the OP Units have the option to redeem their units and to receive, at the option of the Company, in exchange for each four OP Units (i) one share of Common Stock of the Company, or (ii) cash equal to the market value of one share of Common Stock of the Company at the date of conversion, but no fractional shares will be issued.
Management continues to consider whether it is in the best interest of the Company to elect to be treated as a real estate investment trust (or REIT), as defined under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The Company currently operates in a manner that will permit it to elect REIT status; however, the Company may enter into transactions which will preclude it from electing REIT status in the future. In general, a REIT is a company that owns or provides financing for real estate and pays annual distributions to investors of at least 90% of its taxable income. A REIT typically is not subject to federal income taxation on its net income, provided applicable income tax requirements are satisfied. For the tax year 2003, the Company was taxed as a C corporation. It is anticipated that the Company will be taxed as a C corporation for the 2004 tax year.
7
NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. In the opinion of the Company, the accompanying interim unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all material adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments necessary to present fairly the financial condition, the results of operations and changes in cash flows of the Company and its subsidiaries for interim periods.
The results for such interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year. It is suggested that these consolidated financial statements be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2003 and the related notes thereto included in the Companys 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC.
All significant intercompany transactions, receivables and payables have been eliminated in consolidation.
RECLASSIFICATIONS
Certain prior year balances have been reclassified to conform with the current year presentation. In accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, real estate designated as held for sale are accounted for in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 144 and the results of operations of these properties are included in income from discontinued operations. Prior periods have been reclassified for comparability, as required.
Pursuant to a one-for-four reverse stock split of the Companys Common Stock, every four shares of Common Stock outstanding as of the close of business on March 1, 2004 became one share of new post-split Common Stock. Share and per share data (except par value) in the consolidated financial statements and notes for all periods presented have been adjusted to reflect the reverse stock split.
USE OF ESTIMATES
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the results of operations during the reporting period. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates.
NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In May 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity (FAS 150). FAS 150 specifies that certain financial instruments within its scope constitute obligations of the issuer and that, therefore, the issuer must classify them as liabilities. Such financial instruments include mandatorily redeemable financial instruments, obligations to repurchase the issuers equity shares by transferring assets, and certain obligations to issue a variable number of shares. SFAS No. 150 is effective immediately for all financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003. For all other instruments, FAS 150 is effective at the beginning of the third quarter of 2003. The adoption of FAS 150 did not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial position or results of operations.
In April 2003, FASB issued SFAS No. 149, Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (FAS 149). FAS 149 amends and clarifies certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, and for hedging activities under SFAS No. 133. FAS 149 is effective for certain contracts entered into or modified by the Company after June 30, 2003. The adoption of FAS 149 did not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial position or results of operations.
8
REAL ESTATE
Rental properties are stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation, unless circumstances indicate that cost, net of accumulated depreciation, cannot be recovered, in which case the carrying value of the property is reduced to estimated fair value. Estimated fair value (i) is based upon the Companys plans for the continued operation of each property and (ii) is computed using estimated sales price, as determined by prevailing market values for comparable properties and/or the use of capitalization rates multiplied by annualized net operating income based upon the age, construction and use of the building. The fulfillment of the Companys plans related to each of its properties is dependent upon, among other things, the presence of economic conditions which will enable the Company to continue to hold and operate the properties prior to their eventual sale. Due to uncertainties inherent in the valuation process and in the economy, actual results of operating and disposing of the Companys properties could be materially different from current expectations.
Depreciation is provided using the straight-line method over the useful lives of the respective assets. The useful lives are as follows:
Building and Improvements |
|
5 to 40 years |
Tenant Improvements |
|
Term of the related lease |
Furniture and Equipment |
|
3 to 5 years |
CASH EQUIVALENTS
Cash equivalents include all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase.
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The Companys financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, an escrow deposit, tenant and other receivables, notes payable, accounts payable and accrued expenses. Management believes that the carrying value of the Companys financial instruments approximate their respective fair market values at September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003.
DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The Company follows Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 133, as amended, which establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative financial instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts and hedging activities. All derivatives, whether designed as hedging relationships or not, are required to be recorded on the balance sheet at fair value. If the derivative is designated as a fair value hedge, the changes in the fair value of the derivative and of the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk are recognized in earnings. If the derivative is designated as a cash flow hedge, the effective portions of changes in the fair value of the derivative are recorded in other comprehensive income and ineffective portions of changes in the fair value of cash flow hedges are recognized in earnings.
As of December 31, 2003, the Company had interest rate swap contracts in notional amounts of approximately $9,600,000. The interest rate swap contracts were reflected at fair value on the Companys balance sheet at December 31, 2003 in accrued and other liabilities and the changes in the fair value of the hedge were recognized as adjustments to interest expense. The Company had no swap contacts at September 30, 2004. During the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, the Company recorded a benefit of $65,000 and a charge of $202,000, respectively, attributable to changes in the fair value of its derivatives financial instruments.
DEFERRED FINANCING AND OTHER FEES
Fees paid in connection with the financing and leasing of the Companys properties are amortized over the term of the related note payable or lease and are included in other assets.
9
The Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (FAS 123) in October 1995. This standard establishes a fair value approach to valuing stock options awarded to employees as compensation. In December 2002, FASB issued SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure (FAS 148), which amended FAS 123. FAS 148 provides alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. Additionally, FAS 148 amends the disclosure requirements of FAS 123 to require prominent disclosures in the annual and interim financial statements about the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method used on reported results. FAS 148 is effective for financial statements for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2002. In compliance with FAS 148, the Company has elected to continue to follow the intrinsic value method in accounting for its stock-based employee compensation arrangement as defined by APB No. 25 Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.
The Company has in effect its Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan (the Plan), which is described more fully in its Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company has elected, as permitted by FAS 123, to use the intrinsic value based method of accounting for stock options consistent with Accounting Principles Board Opinions No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. The intrinsic value method measures compensation cost for stock options as the excess, if any, of the quoted market price of the Companys stock at the measurement date over the exercise price. No stock-based employee compensation cost is reflected in net income related to stock options, as all options granted under the Plan had an exercise price equal to the average of the high and low sales prices of the underlying common stock on the date of grant.
The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share if the Company had applied the fair value recognition of the provisions of FAS 123 to stock-based employee compensation (thousands of dollars):
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|||||||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
|||||||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|||||
Net loss, as reported |
|
$ |
(4,960 |
) |
$ |
(6,086 |
) |
$ |
(9,716 |
) |
$ |
(12,757 |
) |
|
Deduct: Employee compensation expense for stock option grants under fair value method, net of related tax effects |
|
(44 |
) |
(68 |
) |
(141 |
) |
(212 |
) |
|||||
Pro forma net loss |
|
$ |
(5,004 |
) |
$ |
(6,154 |
) |
$ |
(9,857 |
) |
$ |
(12,969 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Per share data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Basic and diluted, as reported |
|
$ |
(3.17 |
) |
$ |
(3.98 |
) |
$ |
(6.23 |
) |
$ |
(8.70 |
) |
|
Basic and diluted, proforma |
|
$ |
(3.20 |
) |
$ |
(4.02 |
) |
$ |
(6.32 |
) |
$ |
(8.85 |
) |
|
Unit holders in the Operating Partnership (other than the Company) held a 12.30% and 12.61% limited partnership interest in the Operating Partnership at September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively. Each of the holders of the interests in the Operating Partnership (other than the Company) has the option (exercisable after the first anniversary of the issuance of the OP Units) to redeem its OP Units and to receive, at the option of the Company, in exchange for each four OP Units, either (i) one share of Common Stock of the Company, or (ii) cash equal to the value of one share of Common Stock of the Company at the date of conversion, but no fractional shares will be issued.
RENTAL REVENUE
Certain leases provide for tenant occupancy during periods for which no rent is due or where minimum rent payments increase during the term of the lease. The Company records rental income for the full term of each lease on a straight-line basis. Accordingly, a receivable is recorded from tenants equal to the excess
10
of the amount that would have been collected on a straight-line basis over the amount collected and currently due (Deferred Rent Receivable). When a property is acquired, the term of existing leases is considered to commence as of the acquisition date for purposes of this calculation.
The Companys portfolio of leases turns over continuously, with the number and value of expiring leases varying from year to year. The Companys ability to re-lease the space to existing or new tenants at rates equal to or greater than those realized historically is impacted by, among other things, the economic conditions of the market in which a property is located, the availability of competing space, and the level of improvements which may be required at the property. No assurance can be given that the rental rates that the Company will obtain in the future will be equal to or greater than those obtained under existing contractual commitments.
Net loss per share is calculated based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Stock options outstanding of 46,125 at September 30, 2004 and OP Units (other than those held by the Company) outstanding of 880,794 (convertible into approximately 220,198 shares of common stock) at September 30, 2004 have not been included in the net loss per share calculation since their effect would be antidilutive. See Minority Interests paragraph above.
INCOME TAXES
In preparing the Companys consolidated financial statements, management estimates the income tax in each of the jurisdictions in which the Company operates. This process includes an assessment of current tax expense, the results of tax examinations, and the effects of temporary differences resulting from the different treatment of transactions for tax and financial accounting purposes. These differences may result in deferred tax assets or liabilities which are included in the consolidated balance sheet. The realization of deferred tax assets as a result of future taxable income must be assessed and to the extent that the realization is doubtful, a valuation allowance is established. The Companys income tax provision is based on calculations and assumptions that will be subject to examination by the taxing authorities in the jurisdictions in which the Company operates. Should the actual results differ from the Companys estimates, the Company would have to adjust the income tax provision in the period in which the facts and circumstances that give rise to the revision become known. Tax law and rate changes are reflected in the income tax provision in the period in which such changes are enacted.
2004.
On August 2, 2004, the Company acquired a 42,860 square foot office property in Houston, Texas, which is adjacent to an office property owned by the Company. The Company owned the promissory note secured by the property, representing the debt from the owner. Acquisition costs of approximately $2,084,000 included the settlement of the note, the issuance of 10,000 shares of restricted Common Stock (valued for this purpose at $7.50 per share) and cash.
2003.
During 2003, the Company acquired four office properties, three of which were from an affiliated entity. The properties are located in Houston, Texas and consist of approximately 250,437 rentable square feet. Acquisition costs of approximately $16,088,000 included assumed or new mortgage indebtedness of $13,465,000, the issuance of 382,537 OP Units (valued for this purpose at $4.11 per unit), proceeds from a tax deferred exchange of $543,000, deferred payments of $191,000 with the remainder in cash.
Rental revenue and related expenses from the acquired properties was included in the Companys results since their respective dates of acquisition. Therefore, the results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 include results from all of the above acquisitions, whereas, the results of
11
operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003 contain limited results related to these acquisitions.
2004.
On September 30, 2004, the Company sold Van Buren, a 16.65 acre parcel of undeveloped land located in Phoenix, Arizona, for $3,111,000.
On August 24, 2004, the Company sold Parkade Center, a 220,684 square foot office property located in Columbia, Missouri, for $4,127,000.
On July 30, 2004, the Company sold Westlakes, a 95,370 square foot industrial property located in San Antonio, Texas, for $4,975,000.
The three properties sold during the nine months ended September 30, 2004 produced net proceeds of approximately $4,316,000 of which $1,365,000 was held in escrow at September 30, 2004 as a source to facilitate the funding of a future acquisition in a tax-deferred exchange. A net loss of $2,298,000 was incurred in connection with the transactions, which is reflected as discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of operations.
2003.
During 2003, the Company sold eleven properties for an aggregate sales price of $61,162,000. The properties, which totaled 1,477,833 square feet, consisted of six industrial properties, two office buildings, two apartment complexes and one shopping center property. Reference is made to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2003 for more information with respect to the 2003 property dispositions.
In the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, the results of operations for properties mentioned above are shown in the section Discontinued operations through their respective sale date.
INTANGIBLE ASSETS PURCHASED
Upon acquisitions of real estate, the Company assesses the fair value of acquired tangible and intangible assets (including land, buildings, tenant improvements, above and below market leases, origination costs, acquired in-place leases, other identified intangible assets and assumed liabilities in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141), and allocates the purchase price to the acquired assets and assumed liabilities. The Company also considers an allocation of purchase price of other acquired intangibles, including acquired in-place leases.
Real estate assets held for sale.
As of December 31, 2003, three properties were classified as Real estate held for sale. These three properties were sold during the third quarter of 2004. The properties consisted of a 220,684 square foot office property located in Columbia, Missouri, a 95,370 square foot industrial property located in San Antonio, Texas and a 16.65 acre parcel of undeveloped land located in Phoenix, Arizona. The sales
12
produced net proceeds of approximately $4,316,000 of which $1,365,000 was held in escrow at September 30, 2004 as a source to facilitate the funding of a future acquisition in a tax-deferred exchange.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet |
|
December 31, 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate |
|
$ |
14,250 |
|
Other |
|
324 |
|
|
Real estate assets held for sale |
|
$ |
14,574 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable, net |
|
$ |
7,309 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
204 |
|
|
Accrued and other liabilities |
|
505 |
|
|
Liabilities related to real estate held for sale |
|
$ |
8,018 |
|
All real estate assets held by the Company on September 30, 2004 are considered held for investment. No real estate was classified as held for sale by the Company at September 30, 2004.
Net loss from discontinued operations.
Net loss from discontinued operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 includes the results of operations of the three properties sold during the third quarter of 2004. A net loss on sale of discontinued operations totaling $2,298,000 was incurred in connection with the transactions.
The condensed consolidated statements of operations of discontinued operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 are summarized below (dollars in thousands):
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
||
|
|
September 30, 2004 |
|
September 30, 2004 |
|
||
Rental revenue |
|
$ |
305 |
|
$ |
1,311 |
|
Total expenses |
|
280 |
|
1,374 |
|
||
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations before loss on sale |
|
25 |
|
(63 |
) |
||
Loss on sale of discontinued operations |
|
(2,298 |
) |
(2,298 |
) |
||
Net loss from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
(2,273 |
) |
$ |
(2,361 |
) |
Net loss from discontinued operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003 includes the results of operations of eleven properties sold in 2003 and three properties sold in 2004. Seven of the eleven properties, which were sold during the third quarter of 2003, generated a net gain on sale of discontinued operations of $51,000. The net loss from discontinued operations for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 included an impairment charge of $3,500,000 related to an office property subsequently sold in the fourth quarter of 2003. Nine of the eleven properties, which were sold during the nine months ended September 30, 2003, generated a net gain on sale of discontinued operations of $2,279,000. The net gain recognized for the nine months was after taking into consideration an impairment charge totaling $4,000,000 recorded in the second quarter of 2003 related to three of the nine properties. Impairment charges for the nine months ended September 30, 2003, which totaled $7,500,000, were related to four properties sold during 2003. The impairments were based on the anticipated sales price less cost to sell as compared to the carrying value of the assets.
The condensed consolidated statements of operations of discontinued operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003 are summarized below (dollars in thousands):
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
||
|
|
September 30, 2003 |
|
September 30, 2003 |
|
||
Rental revenue |
|
$ |
1,790 |
|
$ |
7,964 |
|
Total expenses |
|
2,233 |
|
9,038 |
|
||
Net loss from discontinued operations before gain on sale and impairment |
|
(443 |
) |
(1,074 |
) |
||
Gain on sale of discontinued operations |
|
51 |
|
2,279 |
|
||
Impairment of real estate assets held for sale |
|
(3,500 |
) |
(7,500 |
) |
||
Net loss from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
(3,892 |
) |
$ |
(6,295 |
) |
13
NOTE 5. MORTGAGE LOAN RECEIVABLE
On October 27, 2003, the Company acquired a note secured by a property adjacent to an office property owned by the Company. The property consists of 42,860 square feet and is located in Houston, Texas. The purchase of this note was funded with a new loan to the Company from the lender that owned the note. Loan costs of approximately $41,000 were incurred in connection with the transaction. The note bore interest at 7.5% per annum. The receivable balance of the note at December 31, 2003 was $1,666,504, net of discount of $83,253. On August 2, 2004 the Company acquired the property. Acquisition costs of approximately $2,084,000 included the settlement of the note, the issuance of 10,000 shares of restricted Common Stock (valued for this purpose at $7.50 per share) and cash.
NOTE 6. NOTES PAYABLE, NET OF PREMIUMS
The Company had the following notes payable outstanding as of September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||
Secured loans with various lenders, net of unamortized premiums of $2,603 at September 30, 2004 and $3,089 at December 31, 2003, bearing interest at fixed rates between 5.00% and 10.50% at September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, with monthly principal and interest payments ranging between $3 and $269 at September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, and maturing at various dates through August 1, 2014. |
|
$ |
130,264 |
|
$ |
121,391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Secured loans with various banks bearing interest at variable rates ranging between 5.61% and 7.00% at September 30, 2004, and 5.14% and 6.50% December 31, 2003, and maturing at various dates through May 1, 2008. |
|
3,988 |
|
9,534 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Secured Series A & B Bonds with a fixed interest rate of 6.39%, monthly principal and interest payments of $74, maturing September 30, 2031. |
|
11,416 |
|
11,532 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Secured Series C Bonds with a fixed interest rate of 9.50%, semi-annual principal and interest payments of $97, maturing November 1, 2006. |
|
400 |
|
475 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Unsecured loans with various lenders, bearing interest at fixed rates between 5.45% and 20.00% at September 30, 2004 and between 4.99% and 20.00% at December 31, 2003, and maturing at various dates through February 19, 2005. |
|
716 |
|
810 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total |
|
$ |
146,784 |
|
$ |
143,742 |
|
Debt premiums are amortized into interest expense over the terms of the related mortgages using the effective interest method. As of September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, the unamortized debt premiums included in the above schedule were $2,603,000 and $3,089,000 respectively.
In August 2004, the Company refinanced a $5,350,000 loan on San Felipe, one of its office properties with a new loan agreement in the amount of $5,500,000. The new loan bears interest at a fixed rate of 5.65% per annum and matures in August 2014. The Company funded closing costs of approximately $178,000 and escrowed $327,000 for future capital expenditures, real estate taxes and insurance related to the August 2004 refinance. Net proceeds of $2,059,000 were received in December 2003 related to the December 2003 refinance of the original $3,000,000 loan on the property.
In August 2004, Company financed costs of $8,750 related to the acquisition of an office property in Houston, Texas. The note bears interest at 10% per annum and matures in November 2004.
In July 2004, the Company refinanced a $5,330,000 loan on Northwest Corporate Center, one of its office properties, with a new loan agreement in the amount of $5,750,000. The new loan bears interest at a fixed rate of 6.26% per annum and matures in August 2014. No proceeds were received directly as a result of the
14
refinance, however $350,000 is being held in escrow by the lender to assist the funding of future capital expenditures at the property.
In May 2004, the Company refinanced a $3,132,000 loan on Mira Mesa, one of its office properties, with a new one-year loan agreement in the amount of $7,500,000. The new loan, which contains two six-month extension options, bears interest at a fixed rate of 7.95% per annum. Net proceeds of $3,440,000 were received as a result of the refinance.
In May 2004, the Company financed insurance premiums of $373,000 on its properties and agreed to pay a service fee of $85,000 over one year.
In November 2003, in connection with the acquisition of an office property in Houston, Texas, the Company obtained a loan in the amount of $4,574,000. The loan, which was due to mature in November 2004, bore interest at a fixed rate of 5% per annum. In October 2004, the maturity date of the loan was extended to November 2005. The loan will bear interest at a fixed rate of 8% under the terms of the extension.
In October 2003, the Company entered into a $4,100,000 loan agreement in connection with the acquisition of an office property in Houston, Texas and the acquisition of a note secured by another office property in Houston. The loan, of which $3,700,000 had been funded as of September 30, 2004, matures in November 2005 and bears interest at a fixed rate of 6% per annum.
In September 2003, a note payable in the amount of $510,000 was repaid with the proceeds from the sale of Emerald Pointe. The note bore interest at prime plus 1%.
In August 2003, the Company refinanced a $1,300,000 loan secured by Van Buren, a parcel of undeveloped land, and entered into a two-year loan agreement in the amount of $1,340,000. The loan bore interest at a fixed rate of 12% per annum and matured August 1, 2005. In September 2004, the loan was paid in connection with the sale of the property.
In July 2003, in connection with the acquisition of an office property in Houston, Texas, the Company assumed a loan in the amount of $1,723,000. The loan bears interest at a fixed rate of 7.41% per annum and matures in May 2005. The Company also entered into an agreement that provided for seller financing of $710,000, bearing interest at a fixed rate of 7.41% per annum and maturing in July 2005.
In May 2003, in connection with the acquisition of an office property in Houston, Texas, the Company assumed a loan in the amount of $3,180,000. The loan bears interest at a fixed rate of 6.80% per annum and matures in August 2012. The Company also entered into an agreement that provided for seller financing of $464,000, bearing interest at a fixed rate of 6.80% per annum and maturing in May 2005.
In May 2003, the successor of Brown Parker and Leahy, LLP cancelled its $199,180 note, plus $45,891 of accrued interest thereon, in exchange for 14,943 shares of the Companys common stock.
In May 2003, John N. Galardi cancelled his $1,600,000 note, plus $286,036 of accrued interest thereon, in exchange for 115,002 shares of the Companys common stock.
In May 2003, the Company financed insurance premiums of $643,000 on its properties and agreed to pay a service fee of $85,000 over one year. The insurance premium note was paid in full in February 2004. The Company financed an additional insurance premium during 2003 of $130,000, which was paid in full in June 2004.
In July 2002, the lender under a loan agreement related to the South Carolina shopping center properties notified the Company it was technically in default under its loan agreement for non-compliance with certain covenants, including covenants requiring improvements to shopping center properties. Thereafter, the lender notified the Company that it was in default for failure to pay a matured portion of the loan, which matured in November 2002. In early 2003, the lender sold the loan to the major tenant in two of the shopping centers. In December 2003, the Company sold one of the shopping center properties and repaid $3,935,000, which included the pay-off of the matured portion of the loan. As of September 30, 2004, the
15
remaining balance of the loan was approximately $2,756,000. The Company continues to discuss the non-compliance matter with the new lender. The new lender has not accelerated the loan.
As the result of the settlement of the Teachout litigation, which was documented in the third quarter of 2003, the Company reaffirmed its previously announced obligation to pay the former limited partners of Sierra Pacific Development Fund II (Fund II) as of the date of the Companys 2001 consolidation transaction (the Consolidation), or their assignees or transferees, the loans which were made and called by the former general partner of Fund II as part of the Consolidation. Pursuant to the settlement, the Company established a repayment plan and secured the debt with a second deed of trust on an office property owned by the Company. This repayment plan consists of a promissory note in the amount of $8,800,000, which bears interest at 6% per annum and matures in March 2006. Interest-only payments, which are payable quarterly, commenced June 2, 2003. The note may be prepaid in whole or in part at any time without penalty.
As part of the settlement, the Company agreed to pay legal fees totaling $1,200,000 to the plaintiffs counsel. The Company made a scheduled payment of $250,000 in the third quarter of 2003 with the remaining $950,000 consisting of two promissory notes. The first note, in the amount of $700,000, bears interest at 6% per annum and matures in March 2006. Interest-only payments, which are payable quarterly, commenced June 2, 2003. The second promissory note, in the amount of $250,000, bears no interest and matures in March 2006. The notes, which are secured by a second deed of trust on an office property owned by the Company, may be prepaid in whole or in part at any time without penalty.
In connection with the agreement, William J. Carden and John N. Galardi acknowledged that they owe the Company the sum of $1,187,695 as indemnification against a portion of the Companys settlement obligation. Mr. Carden is the Chief Executive Officer, a director and a principal stockholder of the Company. Mr. Galardi is a director and principal stockholder of the Company. Mr. Galardi and certain affiliates of Mr. Carden and/or Mr. Galardi are beneficiaries, in part, of the settlement of the Teachout litigation and are owed an amount in excess of this obligation pursuant to that settlement. Mr. Galardi and Mr. Carden have agreed to pay the Company the principal sum of this obligation, plus interest thereon at the annual rate of 6% from March 15, 2003, in the form of an assignment to the Company of their right to receive $1,187,695 of principal payments on the notes payable to them and their affiliates by reason of the settlement of the Teachout litigation, plus all interest payable on such principal amount of notes. The receivable of $1,187,695 and accrued interest are reflected as a component of equity in the Companys consolidated financial statements. In March, the interest due for all of 2004 and $116,875 in principal was paid. The payment was made with certain funds owed to Mr. Carden and Mr. Galardi by the Company related to a guarantee fee. See Note 12 Related Party Transactions.
In August 2004, in connection with the refinance of San Felipe, the Company recorded a loss on early extinguishment of debt of $214,000 due to a prepayment penalty of $120,000 and the write-off of unamortized loan costs of $94,000.
In May 2004, in connection with the refinance of Mira Mesa, the Company recorded a loss on early extinguishment of debt of $613,000 due to a prepayment penalty of $687,000, which was offset in part by the write-off of an unamortized loan premium of $74,000.
The loss on early extinguishment of debt is included in other loss in the consolidated statements of operations.
Unit holders in the Operating Partnership (other than the Company) held a 12.30% and 12.61% limited partnership interest in the Operating Partnership at September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively. Each of the holders of the interests in the Operating Partnership (other than the Company) has the option (exercisable after the first anniversary of the issuance of the OP Units) to redeem its OP Units
16
and to receive, at the option of the Company, in exchange for each four OP Units, either (i) one share of Common Stock of the Company, or (ii) cash equal to the value of one share of Common Stock of the Company at the date of conversion, but no fractional shares will be issued.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2004, a total of 17,963 OP Units were exchanged for 4,486 shares of Common Stock.
In July 2003, the Company purchased 7,329 OP Units from Nooney Development Partners, L.P. for $223,000 pursuant to an agreement entered into at the time of the Consolidation.
During the year ended December 31, 2003, the Company issued a total of 382,537 OP Units to an affiliated entity in connection with the acquisition of three office properties in Houston, Texas.
During the year ended December 31, 2003, a total of 202,056 OP Units were exchanged for 50,514 shares of Common Stock.
On October 23, 2001, the Company issued 5,000 shares of its Common Stock, $.01 par value per share, with the holders right to compel the sale of the stock back to the Company (the Put) at a fixed price of $60.00 per share during the period from October 31, 2002 to November 30, 2002. In November 2002, the Company and holder agreed to extend the put exercise period to May 30, 2003 through June 30, 2003. In May 2003, the Company received notice that the holder exercised its right to sell the Common Stock back to the Company for $60.00 per share or a total of $300,000 and subsequently agreed to a payment schedule. In January 2004, the Company and holder agreed to extend the put exercise period to November 30, 2004 through December 31, 2004.
NOTE 11. REPURCHASE OF COMMON STOCK
In October 2004, the Company announced that it will go forward with an odd lot buy back program previously postponed. The Company has offered to purchase up to 250,000 shares and intends to offer $8.25 per share to holders of fewer than 100 shares.
In September 2004, in conjunction with a resignation agreement, an employee relinquished 1,250 shares of restricted common stock.
In May 2003, the Companys Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 75,000 shares of its common stock from the proceeds of property sales. Such purchases would be made from time to time in open market transactions.
During 2003, the Company repurchased a total of 16,174 shares at an average price of $14.04 per share in open market transactions. The total cost of the stock repurchases amounted to $234,268.
Pursuant to the settlement of the Teachout litigation, the Company repurchased 45 shares from a former limited partner of Fund II for $2,457, or $54.00 per share, during the third quarter of 2003.
In December 2003, the Company repurchased 6,563 shares of restricted stock from an employee for cash of $59,750 and the reversal of deferred compensation of $124,605.
In March 2004, the Company paid a total of $224,520 (Guarantee Fee) to William J. Carden, John N. Galardi and CGS Real Estate Company, Inc. (the Guarantors) in consideration for their guarantees of certain obligations of the Company as of December 31, 2003. The payment was made in the form of an offset against certain sums owed to the Company by the Guarantors. The Company has agreed to pay the Guarantors an annual guarantee fee equal to between .25% and .75% (depending on the nature of the guaranty) of the outstanding balance as of December 31 of the guaranteed obligations. The guaranty fee is to be paid for a maximum of 3 years on any particular obligation. The charge for this guaranty was accrued
17
in 2003 and is included in interest expense on the results of operations. For the first nine months ended September 30, 2004, the Company has accrued $171,000 related to the guarantee fee payable for the 2004 year.
During 2003, the Company made payments totaling $1,000,000, on its indebtedness to an affiliated entity, reducing the balance due to $251,321. The Company has a balance due of $14,800 to an affiliated entity as of September 30, 2004.
During 2003, the Company acquired three office properties from an affiliated entity. The properties are located in Houston, Texas and consist of approximately 160,742 rentable square feet. Acquisition costs of approximately $10,703,000 included assumed or new mortgage indebtedness, the issuance of 382,537 OP Units, deferred payments of $190,469 and cash.
In May 2003, the successor of Brown Parker and Leahy, LLP cancelled its $199,180 note, plus $45,891 of accrued interest thereon, in exchange for 14,943 shares of the Companys common stock. Timothy Brown, a director of the Company, was a partner of Brown Parker Leahy, LLP.
In May 2003, Mr. Galardi cancelled his $1,600,000 note, plus $286,036 of accrued interest thereon, in exchange for 115,002 shares of the Companys common stock.
In May 2003, Mr. Galardi purchased a total of 15,243 shares of the Companys common stock for $16.40 per share.
In February 2003, the Company reached an agreement with CGS Real Estate Company, Inc. whereby CGS acknowledged that it owed the Company a net amount of $270,375 which related to several issues asserted by William J. Carden that were owed by CGS to the Company and by the Company to CGS. This amount is payable on March 15, 2006 with interest accruing from March 15, 2003 at an annual rate of 6% and payable quarterly commencing on June 15, 2003. An affiliate of Mr. Carden is a principal stockholder of CGS. Mr. Carden is an officer and a director of CGS, and an affiliate of Mr. Galardi is a principal stockholder of CGS. Mr. Carden and Mr. Galardi have agreed to guarantee this obligation of CGS, and they have secured this guarantee with an assignment to the Company of their right to receive $270,375 of principal payments on the notes payable to them and their affiliates by reason of the settlement of the Teachout litigation, plus all interest payable on such principal amount of notes. In March 2004, as part of the payment of the Guarantee Fee, interest due on this obligation for 2004 was paid in advance and $26,606 was applied to the principal due on this obligation. The principal balance due as of September 30, 2004 is $243,858.
In connection with the settlement of the Teachout litigation, Mr. Galardi and Mr. Carden acknowledged that they owe the Company the sum of $1,187,695 as indemnification against a portion of the Companys settlement obligation. Mr. Galardi and certain affiliates of Mr. Carden and/or Mr. Galardi are beneficiaries, in part, of the settlement of the Teachout litigation and are owed an amount in excess of this obligation pursuant to that settlement. Mr. Galardi and Mr. Carden have agreed to pay the Company the principal sum of this obligation, plus interest thereon at the annual rate of 6% from March 15, 2003, in the form of an assignment to the Company of their right to receive $1,187,695 of principal payments on the notes payable to them and their affiliates by reason of the settlement of the Teachout litigation, plus all interest payable on such principal amount of notes. The receivable of $1,187,695 and accrued interest are reflected as a component of equity in the Companys consolidated financial statements. In March 2004, as part of the payment of the Guarantee Fee, interest due on this obligation for 2004 was paid in advance and $116,875 was applied to the principal due on this obligation. The balance due as of September 30, 2004 is $1,070,820.
During 2003, the Companys obligation to ASJ, Ltd., which is owned by Mr. Carden, his wife and a trust for his children, was reduced by $111,321 to offset certain amounts which became payable from the related party. In January 2004, the Company paid the remaining balance due of $88,679.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2004, the Company paid $158,237 for real estate related services to a firm in which Patricia A. Nooney, an executive officer of the Company, holds an ownership interest. For the year ended December 31, 2003, the Company paid $98,763 to this firm.
18
In September 2004, the Company began managing an apartment complex owned by an affiliated entity of Mr. Carden. During the nine months ended September 30, 2004, the Company received management fees of $8,000 from this entity.
NOTE 13. SEGMENT INFORMATION
As of September 30, 2004, the Company owned a portfolio of properties comprising office, industrial, shopping center properties, and an apartment property. Each of these property types represents a reportable segment with distinct uses and tenant types and requires the Company to employ different management strategies. The properties contained in the segments are located in various regions and markets within the United States. The office portfolio consists primarily of suburban office buildings. The industrial portfolio consists of properties designed for warehouse, distribution and light manufacturing for single-tenant or multi-tenant use. The shopping center portfolio consists of community shopping centers located in South Carolina. The Companys sole remaining apartment property is located in Missouri and is rented to residential tenants on either a month-by-month basis or for terms generally of one year or less.
The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies. The Company evaluates performance of its property types based on net operating income derived by subtracting property operating expenses from rental revenue. Significant information used by the Company for its reportable segments as of and for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 is as follows (dollars in thousands):
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
Office |
|
Industrial |
|
Shopping |
|
Apartment |
|
Other |
|
Property |
|
|||||||||||
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Rental revenue |
|
$ |
4,846 |
|
$ |
748 |
|
$ |
222 |
|
$ |
704 |
|
|
|
$ |
6,520 |
|
||||||
Property operating expenses |
|
2,099 |
|
141 |
|
45 |
|
473 |
|
|
|
2,758 |
|
|||||||||||
Net operating income (NOI) |
|
$ |
2,747 |
|
$ |
607 |
|
$ |
177 |
|
$ |
231 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
3,762 |
|
|||||
Real estate held for investment, net |
|
$ |
131,280 |
|
$ |
17,160 |
|
$ |
5,153 |
|
$ |
13,482 |
|
$ |
63 |
|
$ |
167,138 |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Rental revenue |
|
$ |
4,127 |
|
$ |
708 |
|
$ |
221 |
|
$ |
671 |
|
$ |
7 |
|
$ |
5,734 |
|
|||||
Property operating expenses |
|
1,939 |
|
166 |
|
70 |
|
403 |
|
|
|
2,578 |
|
|||||||||||
Net operating income (NOI) |
|
$ |
2,188 |
|
$ |
542 |
|
$ |
151 |
|
$ |
268 |
|
$ |
7 |
|
$ |
3,156 |
|
|||||
Real estate held for investment, net |
|
$ |
123,852 |
|
$ |
27,477 |
|
$ |
5,549 |
|
$ |
14,050 |
|
$ |
116 |
|
$ |
161,044 |
|
|||||
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
Office |
|
Industrial |
|
Shopping |
|
Apartment |
|
Other |
|
Property Total |
|
|||||||
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Rental revenue |
|
$ |
15,263 |
|
$ |
1,962 |
|
$ |
749 |
|
$ |
2,032 |
|
|
|
$ |
20,006 |
|
||
Property operating expenses |
|
5,912 |
|
468 |
|
184 |
|
1,262 |
|
$ |
25 |
|
7,851 |
|
||||||
Net operating income (NOI) |
|
$ |
9,351 |
|
$ |
1,494 |
|
$ |
565 |
|
$ |
770 |
|
$ |
(25 |
) |
$ |
12,155 |
|
|
Real estate held for investment, net |
|
$ |
131,280 |
|
$ |
17,160 |
|
$ |
5,153 |
|
$ |
13,482 |
|
$ |
63 |
|
$ |
167,138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Rental revenue |
|
$ |
12,785 |
|
$ |
1,866 |
|
$ |
705 |
|
$ |
2,062 |
|
$ |
57 |
|
$ |
17,475 |
|
|
Property operating expenses |
|
5,129 |
|
584 |
|
224 |
|
1,055 |
|
62 |
|
7,054 |
|
|||||||
Net operating income (NOI) |
|
$ |
7,656 |
|
$ |
1,282 |
|
$ |
481 |
|
$ |
1,007 |
|
$ |
(5 |
) |
$ |
10,421 |
|
|
Real estate held for investment, net |
|
$ |
123,852 |
|
$ |
17,477 |
|
$ |
5,549 |
|
$ |
14,050 |
|
$ |
116 |
|
$ |
161,044 |
|
|
The following is a reconciliation of segment revenues, income and assets to consolidated revenues, income and assets for the periods presented above (dollars in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
||||||||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||||||
REVENUES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Total revenues for reportable segments |
|
$ |
6,520 |
|
$ |
5,734 |
|
$ |
20,006 |
|
$ |
17,475 |
|
||
Other revenues |
|
49 |
|
34 |
|
211 |
|
77 |
|
||||||
Total consolidated revenues |
|
$ |
6,569 |
|
$ |
5,768 |
|
$ |
20,217 |
|
$ |
17,552 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
NET (LOSS) INCOME |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
NOI for reportable segments |
|
$ |
3,762 |
|
$ |
3,156 |
|
$ |
12,155 |
|
$ |
10,421 |
|
||
Unallocated amounts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Interest and other income |
|
49 |
|
34 |
|
211 |
|
77 |
|
||||||
General and administrative expenses |
|
(1,243 |
) |
(1,650 |
) |
(3,551 |
) |
(4,952 |
) |
||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
(2,606 |
) |
(2,212 |
) |
(7,735 |
) |
(6,397 |
) |
||||||
Interest expense |
|
(3,139 |
) |
(2,452 |
) |
(8,998 |
) |
(7,456 |
) |
||||||
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
(214 |
) |
|
|
(827 |
) |
|
|
||||||
Net loss before minority interest and discontinued operations |
|
$ |
(3,391 |
) |
$ |
(3,124 |
) |
$ |
(8,745 |
) |
$ |
(8,307 |
) |
||
19
|
|
September 30, |
|
||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total assets for reportable segments |
|
$ |
167,138 |
|
$ |
161,044 |
|
Real estate held for sale |
|
|
|
22,412 |
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
2,007 |
|
3,464 |
|
||
Tenant and other receivables, net |
|
466 |
|
391 |
|
||
Deferred rent receivable |
|
1,488 |
|
722 |
|
||
Deposits held in escrow |
|
1,365 |
|
560 |
|
||
Investment in management company |
|
4,000 |
|
4,000 |
|
||
Prepaid and other assets, net |
|
10,453 |
|
9,371 |
|
||
Total consolidated assets |
|
$ |
186,917 |
|
$ |
201,964 |
|
The following is information concerning legal proceedings to which the Company or its subsidiaries is a party or of which any of their property is subject:
Lewis Matter
On August 2, 2004, the Orange County Superior Court approved the final accounting in the Robert L. Lewis matter. This matter, initiated on or about September 27, 2001 by Robert L. Lewis, Madison Liquidity Investors 103 LLC and Madison Liquidity Investors 112 LLC, alleged claims against the Company and others for breach of fiduciary duty, breach of contract, intentional interference with prospective economic advantage, and intentional interference with contractual relations related to the Companys 2001 consolidation transaction, although the consolidation was disclosed in a Prospectus/Consent Solicitation filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and was approved by a majority vote of the limited partners of the partnerships. In October 2003, counsel for the plaintiffs and counsel for the defendants executed a Memorandum of Understanding regarding a proposed settlement in this matter. By the terms of that Memorandum, the defendants agreed to pay a total of $6,500,000 to settle this action and all other claims known and unknown relating to the facts set forth in the plaintiffs complaints. The settlement was funded, in its entirety, by insurance coverage. In 2004, the Court approved the settlement as fair, adequate and reasonable and the defendants insurers deposited $6,500,000 into an escrow account for the purposes of settlement. Subsequently, $1,640,000 was disbursed for attorney fees and expenses, while the remaining $4,860,000 was distributed to the plaintiffs. Reference is made to the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for 2003 for more information with respect to this matter.
Other Matters
Certain claims and lawsuits have arisen against the Company in its normal course of business. The Company believes that such claims and lawsuits will not have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial position, cash flow or results of operations.
The Company has become aware that two of its properties may contain hazardous substances above reportable levels. The Company is currently evaluating this situation to determine an appropriate course of action.
20
Contractual Obligations and Commitments
The following table aggregates the Companys contractual obligations subsequent to September 30, 2004 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
Thereafter |
|
Total |
|
|||||||
Long-term debt (1) (2) |
|
$ |
3,070 |
|
$ |
21,146 |
|
$ |
5,544 |
|
$ |
1,605 |
|
$ |
4,903 |
|
$ |
107,913 |
|
$ |
144,181 |
|
Litigation settlement (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
9,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,750 |
|
|||||||
Capital lease expenditures (4) |
|
2,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,240 |
|
|||||||
Employee obligations (5) |
|
50 |
|
167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
217 |
|
|||||||
Total |
|
$ |
5,360 |
|
$ |
21,313 |
|
$ |
15,294 |
|
$ |
1,605 |
|
$ |
4,903 |
|
$ |
107,913 |
|
$ |
156,388 |
|
(1) See Note 6 Notes Payable.
(2) Includes debt of $7,500,000 with two 6-month extension options to May 2006.
(3) Represents obligations related to the settlement of the Teachout litigation. See Note 7 Notes Payable, Litigation Settlement.
(4) Represents commitments for tenant improvements and lease commissions related to the leasing of spaceto new or renewing tenants.
(5) Represents employment agreement commitments for officers of the Company.
NOTE 15. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On October 29, 2004, the Company refinanced a $1,175,800 loan on one of its office properties due to mature in May 2005 and entered into a revolving credit promissory note in the amount of $2,250,000, of which $1,226,000 has been drawn to cover the repayment of existing debt and financing costs. The note bears interest at prime plus 1% per annum and matures in November 2006.
On October 20, 2004, the Company acquired an office property in Houston, Texas consisting of 81,587 rentable square feet. Acquisition costs of approximately $5,900,000 included proceeds from a tax-deferred exchange, the assumption of existing debt and seller financing.
21
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
OVERVIEW
ASR is a full-service real estate corporation, which owns, manages and operates income-producing properties. Substantially all of the Companys assets are held through its Operating Partnership in which the Company, as of September 30, 2004, held the sole general partner interest of ..87% and a limited partnership interest totaling 86.83%. As of September 30, 2004, through its majority-owned subsidiary, the Operating Partnership, the Company owned and operated 24 properties, which consisted of 17 office buildings, four industrial properties, two shopping centers and one apartment complex. The 24 properties are located in seven states.
During the first nine months of 2004, the Company sold three properties, which consisted of one office building, one industrial property and a parcel of undeveloped land, and acquired one office building in Houston, Texas. During 2003, the Company sold eleven properties, which consisted of two apartment complexes, two office buildings, six industrial properties and one shopping center, and acquired four office buildings in Houston, Texas. During 2002, the Company sold two shopping center properties and one apartment property, and purchased three office properties in the Houston area. The property sales and acquisitions were part of the Companys strategy to sell certain of its properties in its non-core markets and acquire additional properties in its core property types and core geographic markets. The Company intends to continue to focus primarily on office and industrial properties located in Texas, California and Arizona.
On September 30, 2004, the properties owned by the Company were 86% occupied compared to 78% occupied on September 30, 2003. The Company continues to aggressively pursue prospective tenants to increase its occupancy, which is expected to improve operational results.
In the accompanying consolidated statement of operations, the results of operations for properties sold are shown in the section Discontinued operations. Therefore the revenues and expenses reported for the quarters and nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 reflect results from properties currently owned by the Company. As of December 31, 2003, three properties were classified on the balance sheet as real estate held for sale. These three properties were sold during the third quarter of 2004. All real estate assets held by the Company on September 30, 2004 are considered held for investment. No real estate was classified as held for sale by the Company at September 30, 2004.
The share data in this Item 2 has been adjusted to give effect to the one-for-four reverse stock split which became effective March 2, 2004.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
The major accounting policies followed by the Company are listed in Note 2 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies. of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The consolidated financial statements of the Company are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the results of operations during the reporting period. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.
The Company believes the following critical accounting policies affect its more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements:
Certain leases provide for tenant occupancy during periods for which no rent is due or where minimum rent payments increase during the term of the lease. The Company records rental income for the full term of each lease on a straight-line basis. Accordingly, a receivable, if deemed collectible, is recorded from tenants equal to the excess of the amount that would have been collected on a straight-line basis over the amount collected and currently due (Deferred Rent Receivable). When a property is acquired, the term of existing leases is considered to commence as of the acquisition date for purposes of this calculation.
22
Rental properties are stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation, unless circumstances indicate that cost, net of accumulated depreciation, cannot be recovered, in which case the carrying value of the property is reduced to estimated fair value. Estimated fair value (i) is based upon the Companys plans for the continued operation of each property and (ii) is computed using estimated sales price, as determined by prevailing market values for comparable properties and/or the use of capitalization rates multiplied by annualized net operating income based upon the age, construction and use of the building. The fulfillment of the Companys plans related to each of its properties is dependent upon, among other things, the presence of economic conditions which will enable the Company to continue to hold and operate the properties prior to their eventual sale. Due to uncertainties inherent in the valuation process and in the economy, the actual results of operating and disposing of the Companys properties could be materially different than current expectations.
Gains on property sales are accounted for in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 66, Accounting for Sales of Real Estate. Gains are recognized in full when real estate is sold, provided (i) the gain is determinable, that is, the collectibility of the sales price is reasonably assured or the amount that will not be collectible can be estimated, and (ii) the earnings process is virtually complete, that is, the Company is not obligated to perform significant activities after the sale to earn the gain. Losses on property sales are recognized immediately.
Management continues to consider whether it is in the best interest of the Company to elect to be treated as a real estate investment trust (or REIT), as defined under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The Company currently operates in a manner that will permit it to elect REIT status; however, the Company may enter into transactions which will preclude it from electing REIT status in the future. In general, a REIT is a company that owns or provides financing for real estate and pays annual distributions to investors of at least 90% of its taxable income. A REIT typically is not subject to federal income taxation on its net income, provided applicable income tax requirements are satisfied. For the tax year 2003, the Company was taxed as a C corporation. It is anticipated that the Company will be taxed as a C corporation for the 2004 tax year.
In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, the operating results of the eleven properties sold in 2003 and the three properties sold in 2004 are reported as discontinued operations in the results of operations. See Note 4 Discontinued Operations of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Unless otherwise indicated, the following discussion reflects the results from continuing operations, which include the real estate assets held for investment.
Discussion of the three months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003.
The following table shows a comparison of rental revenues and certain expenses for the quarters ended September 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variance |
|
||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
$ |
|
% |
|
||
Rental revenue |
|
$ |
6,520,000 |
|
$ |
5,734,000 |
|
786,000 |
|
13.7 |
% |
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Property operating expenses |
|
2,758,000 |
|
2,578,000 |
|
180,000 |
|
7.0 |
% |
||
General and administrative |
|
1,243,000 |
|
1,650,000 |
|
(407,000 |
) |
(24.7 |
)% |
||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
2,606,000 |
|
2,212,000 |
|
394,000 |
|
17.8 |
% |
||
Interest expense |
|
3,139,000 |
|
2,452,000 |
|
687,000 |
|
28.0 |
% |
||
Rental revenue. The increase of $786,000, or 13.7%, was attributable to $456,000 in revenue generated from three office properties acquired subsequent to the third quarter of 2003 and $330,000 in higher revenues from properties owned on September 30, 2004 and September 30, 2003 (Same Properties). Two of the properties were acquired during the fourth quarter of 2003 and one was acquired during the third
23
quarter of 2004. Rental revenue from the acquired properties was included in the Companys results since their respective dates of acquisition. The weighted average occupancy of properties held for investment increased to 86% on September 30, 2004 from 78% on September 30, 2003.
Property operating expenses. The increase of $180,000, or 7.0%, was due primarily to expenses related to the three acquired properties mentioned above.
General and administrative. The decrease of $407,000 was in large part due to a decrease in compensation expense, primarily due to the closure of the Companys office in New York and the downsizing of its administrative staff, especially in the St. Louis and San Diego offices. Further, professional fees decreased due to the settlement of two major lawsuits in 2003 and the hiring of in-house legal counsel. Both of these factors contributed to the reduced fees for outside legal services incurred in the first nine months of 2004 compared to the first nine months of 2003.
Depreciation and amortization. The increase of $394,000 was related to depreciation of capital improvements and amortization of capitalized lease costs incurred in 2002 and 2003 and also the depreciation related to the three above mentioned acquired properties. During the last two years, 2002 and 2003, the Company spent approximately $8,186,000 in capital improvements on its existing properties, primarily for renovations and tenant improvements.
Interest expense. The increase of $687,000 was due to (i) the higher interest expense and fees on increased debt on three of its properties, (ii) the interest expense associated with the three acquired properties mentioned above, (iii) the Company recording interest at the default rate on debt related to one of its shopping center properties and (iv) the accrual of a loan guarantee fee.
In July 2004, the Company refinanced a $5,330,000 loan on Northwest Corporate Center, one of its office properties, with a new loan agreement in the amount of $5,750,000. The new loan bears interest at a fixed rate of 6.26% per annum and matures in August 2014. In May 2004, the Company refinanced a $3,132,000 loan on Mira Mesa, one of its office properties, with a new one-year loan agreement in the amount of $7,500,000 bearing interest at 7.95%. In December 2003, the Company refinanced a $3,000,000 loan on San Felipe, one of its office properties, with a one-year loan in the amount of $5,350,000 bearing interest at 7.95%. In August 2004, the loan was refinanced again with a new loan agreement in the amount of $5,500,000. The new loan bears interest at a fixed rate of 5.65% per annum and matures in August 2014.
In July 2002, the lender under a loan agreement related to the South Carolina shopping center properties notified the Company it was technically in default under its loan agreement for non-compliance with certain covenants, including covenants requiring improvements to shopping center properties. Thereafter, the lender notified the Company that it was in default for failure to pay a matured portion of the loan, which matured in November 2002. In early 2003, the lender sold the loan to the major tenant in two of the shopping centers. In December 2003, the Company sold one of the shopping center properties and repaid $3,935,000, which included the pay-off of the matured portion of the loan. As of September 30, 2004, the remaining balance of the loan was approximately $2,756,000. The Company continues to discuss the non-compliance matter with the new lender. The new lender has not accelerated the loan.
The loan guarantee fee, which is payable to two of the Companys directors and their affiliated entity, is in consideration of their guarantees of certain indebtedness of the Company. In 2004, effective in 2003, the Company agreed to pay an annual guarantee fee equal to between .25% and .75% (depending on the nature of the guaranty) of the outstanding balance as of December 31 of each year of the guaranteed obligations. The guaranty fee is to be paid for a maximum of 3 years on any particular obligation. For the third quarter of 2004, the Company accrued $57,000 related to this guarantee fee. The fee for 2003 was accrued in the fourth quarter of 2003.
Loss on extinguishment of debt. In August 2004, in connection with the refinance of San Felipe, the Company recorded a loss on early extinguishment of debt of $214,000 due to a prepayment penalty of $120,000 and the write-off of unamortized loan costs of $94,000.
Discontinued operations. The Company recorded income from discontinued operations of $25,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2004 related to the three properties sold during the third quarter of 2004.
24
The Company recorded a loss from discontinued operations of $443,000 for the quarter ended September 30, 2003. No properties were classified as held for sale as of September 30, 2004. See Note 4 Discontinued Operations of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
The income (loss) from discontinued operations is summarized below.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|||
|
|
September 30, 2004 |
|
September 30, 2003 |
|
|||
Rental revenue |
|
$ |
305 |
|
$ |
1,790 |
|
|
Total expenses |
|
280 |
|
2,233 |
|
|||
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
25 |
|
$ |
(443 |
) |
|
Loss on sale of discontinued operations. The Company sold three properties one office building, one industrial property and a parcel of undeveloped land - during the third quarter of 2004 for an aggregate of $12,214,000. Losses totaling $2,597,000 were recorded on the sale of the office building and the parcel of undeveloped land. The sale of the industrial property generated a gain of $299,000. The Company sold seven properties during the third quarter of 2003 for an aggregate of $37,292,000 and recognized a net gain of $51,000, after taking into consideration an impairment charge totaling $4,000,000 recorded in the second quarter of 2003 related to three of the seven properties. The impairment was based on the anticipated sales price less cost to sell as compared to the carrying value of the assets.
Impairment of real estate assets held for sale. The Company recorded an impairment of $3,500,000 during the third quarter of 2003 on an office property, which was sold in the fourth quarter of 2003. The impairment was based on the anticipated sales price less cost to sell as compared to the carrying value of the asset.
Discussion of the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003.
The following table shows a comparison of rental revenues and certain expenses for the nine months ended September 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variance |
|
||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
$ |
|
% |
|
||
Rental revenue |
|
$ |
20,006,000 |
|
$ |
17,475,000 |
|
2,531,000 |
|
14.5 |
% |
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Property operating expenses |
|
7,851,000 |
|
7,054,000 |
|
797,000 |
|
11.3 |
% |
||
General and administrative |
|
3,551,000 |
|
4,952,000 |
|
(1,401,000 |
) |
(28.3 |
)% |
||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
7,735,000 |
|
6,397,000 |
|
1,338,000 |
|
20.1 |
% |
||
Interest expense |
|
8,998,000 |
|
7,456,000 |
|
1,542,000 |
|
20.1 |
% |
||
Rental revenue. The increase of $2,531,000, or 14.5%, was attributable to (i) $1,798,000 in revenue generated from five office properties acquired in May 2003 through August 2004, (ii) a $196,000 payment received from the owner of a neighboring property for past use of common parking areas and (iii) higher revenues of $537,000 for Same Properties. Rental revenue from the acquired properties was included in the Companys results since their respective dates of acquisition. The weighted average occupancy of properties held for investment was 86% at September 30, 2004 and 78% at September 30, 2003.
Property operating expenses. The increase of $797,000, or 11.3%, was due to the expenses related to the five acquired properties mentioned above, offset in part by an $190,000 reduction in operating expenses for other properties owned by the Company.
General and administrative. The decrease of $1,401,000 was in large part due to a decrease in compensation expense, primarily due to the closure of the Companys office in New York and the downsizing of its administrative staff, especially in the St. Louis and San Diego offices. Further, professional fees decreased due to the settlement of two major lawsuits in 2003 and the hiring of in-house legal counsel. Both of these factors contributed to the reduced fees for outside legal services incurred in the first nine months of 2004 compared to the first nine months of 2003.
25
Depreciation and amortization. The increase of $1,338,000 was related to depreciation of capital improvements and amortization of capitalized lease costs incurred in 2002 and 2003 and also the depreciation related to the five acquired properties mentioned above. During the last two years, 2002 and 2003, the Company has approximately $8,186,000 in capital improvements on its existing properties, primarily for renovations and tenant improvements.
Interest expense. The increase of $1,542,000 was due to (i) the higher interest expense and fees on increased debt on three of its properties, (ii) the interest expense associated with the five acquired properties mentioned above, (iii) the Company recording interest at the default rate on debt related to one of its shopping center properties and (iv) the accrual of a loan guarantee fee.
In July 2004, the Company refinanced a $5,330,000 loan on Northwest Corporate Center, one of its office properties, with a new loan agreement in the amount of $5,750,000. The new loan bears interest at a fixed rate of 6.26% per annum and matures in August 2014. In May 2004, the Company refinanced a $3,132,000 loan on Mira Mesa, one of its office properties, with a new one-year loan agreement in the amount of $7,500,000 bearing interest at 7.95%. In December 2003, the Company refinanced a $3,000,000 loan on San Felipe, one of its office properties, with a one-year loan in the amount of $5,350,000 bearing interest at 7.95%. In August 2004, the loan was refinanced again with a new loan agreement in the amount of $5,500,000. The new loan bears interest at a fixed rate of 5.65% per annum and matures in August 2014.
In July 2002, the lender under a loan agreement related to the South Carolina shopping center properties notified the Company it was technically in default under its loan agreement for non-compliance with certain covenants, including covenants requiring improvements to shopping center properties. Thereafter, the lender notified the Company that it was in default for failure to pay a matured portion of the loan, which matured in November 2002. In early 2003, the lender sold the loan to the major tenant in two of the shopping centers. In December 2003, the Company sold one of the shopping center properties and repaid $3,935,000, which included the pay-off of the matured portion of the loan. As of September 30, 2004, the remaining balance of the loan was approximately $2,756,000. The Company continues to discuss the non-compliance matter with the new lender. The new lender has not accelerated the loan.
The loan guarantee fee, which is payable to two of the Companys directors and their affiliated entity, is in consideration of their guarantees of certain indebtedness of the Company. In 2004, effective in 2003, the Company agreed to pay an annual guarantee fee equal to between .25% and .75% (depending on the nature of the guaranty) of the outstanding balance as of December 31 of each year of the guaranteed obligations. The guaranty fee is to be paid for a maximum of 3 years on any particular obligation. For the first nine months of 2004, the Company accrued $171,000 related to this guarantee fee. The fee for 2003 was accrued in the fourth quarter of 2003.
Loss on extinguishment of debt. The Company recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt of $827,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2004. In May 2004, in connection with the refinance of Mira Mesa, the Company recorded a loss on early extinguishment of debt of $613,000 due to a prepayment penalty of $687,000, which was offset in part by the write-off of an unamortized loan premium of $74,000. In August 2004, in connection with the refinance of San Felipe, the Company recorded a loss on early extinguishment of debt of $214,000 due to a prepayment penalty of $120,000 and the write-off of unamortized loan costs of $94,000.
Discontinued operations. The Company recorded a loss from discontinued operations of $63,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 related to the three properties sold in the third quarter. The Company recorded a loss from discontinued operations of $1,074,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 related to the eleven properties sold in 2003 and three properties sold in 2004. See Note 4 Discontinued Operations of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
The loss from discontinued operations is summarized below.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
||
|
|
September 30, 2004 |
|
September 30, 2003 |
|
||
Rental revenue |
|
$ |
1,311 |
|
$ |
7,964 |
|
Total expenses |
|
1,374 |
|
9,038 |
|
||
Net loss from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
(63 |
) |
$ |
(1,074 |
) |
26
Gain on sale of discontinued operations. The Company sold three properties one office building, one industrial property and a parcel of undeveloped land - during the first nine months of 2004 for an aggregate of $12,214,000. Losses totaling $2,597,000 were recorded on the sale of the office building and the parcel of undeveloped land. The sale of the industrial property generated a gain of $299,000. The Company sold nine properties during the first nine months of 2003 for an aggregate of $53,892,000 and recognized a net gain of $2,279,000, after taking into consideration an impairment charge totaling $7,500,000 of which $4,000,000 was recorded in the second quarter of 2003 and $3,500,000 related to an office property subsequently sold in the fourth quarter of 2003. The impairment charges were based on the anticipated sales prices less costs to sell as compared to the carrying value of the assets.
Impairment of real estate assets held for sale. The Company recorded an impairment of $7,500,000 on four properties held for sale in 2003. The impairment was based on the anticipated sales price less cost to sell as compared to the carrying value of the assets. The four properties, which were sold in 2003, consisted of two office and two industrial properties.
During first nine months of 2004, the Company derived cash from collection of rents, sale of an industrial property and proceeds from refinancing of debt on an office property in California. Major uses of cash included payment for capital improvements to real estate assets, primarily for tenant improvements, payment of operational expenses, repayment of borrowings and purchase of an office building in Houston, Texas.
The Company reported a net loss of $9,716,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 compared to a net loss of $12,757,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2003. These results include the following non-cash items:
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||
Non-Cash Charges: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Depreciation and amortization from real estate held for investment |
|
$ |
7,735 |
|
$ |
6,397 |
|
Mark-to-market adjustments on interest rate protection agreements |
|
|
|
202 |
|
||
Deferred compensation expense |
|
83 |
|
233 |
|
||
Non-Cash Items: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Deferred rental income |
|
(447 |
) |
(305 |
) |
||
Minority interest |
|
(1,390 |
) |
(1,845 |
) |
||
Interest on receivable from principal stockholders |
|
(50 |
) |
(39 |
) |
||
Amortization of loan premiums |
|
(411 |
) |
(384 |
) |
||
Amortization of note receivable discount |
|
(58 |
) |
|
|
||
Mark-to-market adjustments on interest rate protection agreements |
|
(65 |
) |
|
|
||
Net cash provided by investing activities for nine months ended September 30, 2004 amounted to $5,953,000. This amount was primarily attributable proceeds received from the sale of three properties during the period. Funds were used for capital expenditures, primarily for tenant improvements. Net cash provided from investing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 was $29,178,000 primarily from proceeds from the sales of properties. Funds used for capital improvements for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 amounted to $2,824,000, primarily for tenant improvements.
Net cash used by financing activities amounted to $4,516,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2004. Net funds provided from borrowings of $19,208,000 were primarily due to the refinancing the debt on three properties as discussed below. Scheduled principal payments for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 amounted to $2,063,000. Net cash used in financing activities amounted to $23,639,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 primarily to repay debt on properties sold during the period. Repayments of borrowings of $3,198,000 consisted of scheduled principal payments made during the nine months ended September 30, 2003. Proceeds from borrowings, which totaled
27
$2,098,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2003, consisted of (i) $1,340,000 related to the refinancing of debt on a property, (ii) $728,000 to fund property insurance premiums and service fee and (iii) $30,000 from an affiliate of a related party which completed the funding of an $830,000 loan on Valencia entered into in December of 2002. The mortgage was repaid in conjunction with the sale of the property in April 2003. In addition, funds were used to pay amounts due related to the Teachout settlement, to acquire units in the Operating Partnership, and to purchase 17,500 shares of common stock of the Company pursuant to a stock repurchase plan previously disclosed. Also, John N. Galardi purchased 60,975 shares of the Companys common stock for $250,000 in May 2003.
In August 2004, the Company refinanced a $5,350,000 loan on San Felipe, one of its office properties with a new loan agreement in the amount of $5,500,000. The new loan bears interest at a fixed rate of 5.65% per annum and matures in August 2014. The Company funded closing costs of approximately $178,000 and escrowed $327,000 for future capital expenditures, real estate taxes and insurance related to the August 2004 refinance. Net proceeds of $2,059,000 were received in December 2003 related to the December 2003 refinance of the original $3,000,000 loan on the property.
In July 2004, the Company refinanced a $5,330,000 loan on Northwest Corporate Center, one of its office properties, with a new loan agreement in the amount of $5,750,000. The new loan bears interest at a fixed rate of 6.26% per annum and matures in August 2014. No proceeds were received directly as a result of the refinance, however $350,000 is being held in escrow by the lender to assist the funding of future capital expenditures at the property.
In May 2004, the Company refinanced a $3,132,000 loan on Mira Mesa, one of its office properties, with a new one-year loan agreement in the amount of $7,500,000. The new loan, which contains two six-month extension options, bears interest at a fixed rate of 7.95% per annum.
In May 2004, the Company financed insurance premiums of $373,000 on its properties and agreed to pay a service fee of $85,000 over one year.
In November 2003, in connection with the acquisition of an office property in Houston, Texas, the Company obtained a loan in the amount of $4,574,000. The loan, which was due to mature in November 2004, bore interest at a fixed rate of 5% per annum. In October 2004, the maturity date of the loan was extended to November 2005. The loan will bear interest at a fixed rate of 8% under the terms of the extension.
In October 2003, the Company entered into a $4,100,000 loan agreement in connection with the acquisition of an office property in Houston, Texas and the acquisition of a note secured by another office property in Houston. The loan, of which $3,700,000 had been funded as of September 30, 2004, matures in November 2005 and bears interest at a fixed rate of 6% per annum.
In August 2003, the Company refinanced a $1,300,000 loan secured by Van Buren, a parcel of undeveloped land, and entered into a two-year loan agreement in the amount of $1,340,000. The loan bore interest at a fixed rate of 12% per annum and matured August 1, 2005. In September 2004, the loan was paid in connection with the sale of the property.
In July 2003, in connection with the acquisition of an office property in Houston, Texas, the Company assumed a loan in the amount of $1,723,000. The loan bears interest at a fixed rate of 7.41% per annum and matures in May 2005. The Company also entered into an agreement that provided for seller financing of $710,000, bearing interest at a fixed rate of 7.41% per annum and maturing in July 2005.
In May 2003, in connection with the acquisition of an office property in Houston, Texas, the Company assumed a loan in the amount of $3,180,000. The loan bears interest at a fixed rate of 6.80% per annum and matures in August 2012. The Company also entered into an agreement that provided for seller financing of $464,000, bearing interest at a fixed rate of 6.80% per annum and maturing in May 2005.
In May 2003, the successor of Brown Parker and Leahy, LLP cancelled its $199,180 note, plus $45,891 of accrued interest thereon, in exchange for 14,943 shares of the Companys common stock.
28
In May 2003, John N. Galardi cancelled his $1,600,000 note, plus $286,036 of accrued interest thereon, in exchange for 115,002 shares of the Companys common stock.
In July 2002, the lender under a loan agreement related to the South Carolina shopping center properties notified the Company it was technically in default under its loan agreement for non-compliance with certain covenants, including covenants requiring improvements to shopping center properties. Thereafter, the lender notified the Company that it was in default for failure to pay a matured portion of the loan, which matured in November 2002. In early 2003, the lender sold the loan to the major tenant in two of the shopping centers. In December 2003, the Company sold one of the shopping center properties and repaid $3,935,000, which included the pay-off of the matured portion of the loan. As of September 30, 2004, the remaining balance of the loan was approximately $2,756,000. The Company continues to discuss the non-compliance matter with the new lender. The new lender has not accelerated the loan.
The Company expects to meet its short-term liquidity requirements for normal property operating expenses and general and administrative expenses from cash generated by operations and cash currently held. In addition, the Company anticipates capital costs to be incurred related to re-leasing space and improvements to properties, litigation settlement costs, state income taxes and other fees for professional services. The funds to meet these obligations will be obtained from proceeds of the sale of assets and lender held funds. Based on current analysis, the Company believes that the cash generated by these anticipated activities will be adequate to meet these obligations. There can be no assurance, however, that these activities will occur and that substantial cash will be generated. If these activities do not occur, the Company will not have sufficient cash to meet its obligations.
In addition, as of September 30, 2004, the Company has substantial debt becoming due in 2004, 2005 and 2006. Based on the Companys historical losses and current debt level, there can be no assurances as to the Companys ability to obtain funds necessary for the refinancing of these maturing debts. If refinancing transactions are not consummated, the Company will seek extensions and/or modifications from the existing lenders. If these refinancings do not occur, the Company will not have sufficient cash to meet its obligations.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND COMMITMENTS
The following table aggregates the Companys contractual obligations subsequent to September 30, 2004 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
Thereafter |
|
Total |
|
|||||||||||
Long-term debt (1) (2) |
|
$ |
3,070 |
|
$ |
21,146 |
|
$ |
5,544 |
|
$ |
1,605 |
|
$ |
4,903 |
|
$ |
107,913 |
|
$ |
144,181 |
|
||||
Litigation settlement (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
9,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,750 |
|
|||||||||||
Capital lease expenditures (4) |
|
2,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,240 |
|
|||||||||||
Employee obligations (5) |
|
50 |
|
167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
217 |
|
|||||||||||
Total |
|
$ |
5,360 |
|
$ |
21,313 |
|
$ |
15,294 |
|
$ |
1,605 |
|
$ |
4,903 |
|
$ |
107,913 |
|
$ |
156,388 |
|
||||
(1) See Note 6 Notes Payable in the accompanying consolidated financial statements of the Company.
(2) Includes debt of $7,500,000 with two 6-month extension options to May 2006.
(3) Represents obligations related to the settlement of the Teachout litigation. See Note 7 Notes Payable, Litigation Settlement in the accompanying consolidated financial statements of the Company.
(4) Represents commitments for tenant improvements and lease commissions related to the leasing of space to new or renewing tenants.
(5) Represents employment agreement commitments for officers of the Company.
INFLATION
Substantially all of the leases at the industrial and retail properties provide for pass-through to tenants of certain operating costs, including real estate taxes, common area maintenance expenses, and insurance. Leases at the apartment property generally provide for an initial term of one month to one year and allow for rent adjustments at the time of renewal. Leases at the office properties typically provide for rent adjustments and pass-through of increases in operating expenses during the term of the lease. All of these
29
provisions may permit the Company to increase rental rates or other charges to tenants in response to rising prices and, therefore, serve to reduce the Companys exposure to the adverse effects of inflation.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. These forward-looking statements are based on managements beliefs and expectations, which may not be correct. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements include the following: the Companys level of indebtedness and ability to refinance its debt; the fact that the Companys predecessors have had a history of losses in the past; unforeseen liabilities which could arise as a result of the prior operations of companies acquired in the 2001 consolidation transaction; risks inherent in the Companys acquisition and development of properties in the future, including risks associated with the Companys strategy of investing in under-valued assets; general economic, business and market conditions, including the impact of the current economic downturn; changes in federal and local laws, and regulations; increased competitive pressures; and other factors, including the factors set forth below, as well as factors set forth elsewhere in this Report on Form 10-Q.
RISK FACTORS
Stockholders or potential stockholders should read the Risk Factors section of the Companys latest annual report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in conjunction with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q to better understand the factors affecting the Companys financial condition and results of operations.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK
INTEREST RATES
One of the Companys primary market risk exposure is to changes in interest rates on its borrowings.
It is the Companys policy to manage its exposure to fluctuations in market interest rates for its borrowings through the use of fixed rate debt instruments to the extent that reasonably favorable rates are obtainable with such arrangements. In order to maximize financial flexibility when selling properties and minimize potential prepayment penalties on fixed rate loans, the Company has also entered into variable rate debt arrangements.
At September 30, 2004, the Companys total indebtedness included fixed-rate debt of approximately $152,546,000 and floating-rate indebtedness of approximately $3,988,000. The Company continually reviews the portfolios interest rate exposure in an effort to minimize the risk of interest rate fluctuations. The Company does not have any other material market-sensitive financial instruments.
A change of 1.00% in the index rate to which the Companys variable rate debt is tied would change the annual interest incurred by the Company by approximately $39,875, or $0.03 per share, based upon the balances outstanding on variable rate instruments at September 30, 2004.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Management, including the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer, have evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the quarter covered by this report. Based on, and as of the date of, that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective, in all material respects, to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports the Company files and submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported as and when required.
There have been no significant changes in the Companys internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of the evaluation referred to above.
30
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The following is information concerning legal proceedings to which the Company or its subsidiaries is a party or of which any of their property is subject:
Lewis Matter
On August 2, 2004, the Orange County Superior Court approved the final accounting in the Robert L. Lewis matter. This matter, initiated on or about September 27, 2001 by Robert L. Lewis, Madison Liquidity Investors 103 LLC and Madison Liquidity Investors 112 LLC, alleged claims against the Company and others for breach of fiduciary duty, breach of contract, intentional interference with prospective economic advantage, and intentional interference with contractual relations related to the Companys 2001 consolidation transaction, although the consolidation was disclosed in a Prospectus/Consent Solicitation filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and was approved by a majority vote of the limited partners of the partnerships. In October 2003, counsel for the plaintiffs and counsel for the defendants executed a Memorandum of Understanding regarding a proposed settlement in this matter. By the terms of that Memorandum, the defendants agreed to pay a total of $6,500,000 to settle this action and all other claims known and unknown relating to the facts set forth in the plaintiffs complaints. The settlement was funded, in its entirety, by insurance coverage. In 2004, the Court approved the settlement as fair, adequate and reasonable and the defendants insurers deposited $6,500,000 into an escrow account for the purposes of settlement. Subsequently, $1,640,000 was disbursed for attorney fees and expenses, while the remaining $4,860,000 was distributed to the plaintiffs. Reference is made to the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for 2003 for more information with respect to this matter.
Other Matters
Certain claims and lawsuits have arisen against the Company in its normal course of business. The Company believes that such claims and lawsuits will not have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial position, cash flow or results of operations.
In August 2004, the Company issued 10,000 shares of unregistered Common Stock. The shares were issued to the seller of an office property located in Houston, Texas as part of the Companys consideration for the acquisition of the property. The consideration related to the issued shares amounted to $75,000 (valued for this purpose at $7.50 per share).
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) Exhibits:
The Exhibit Index attached hereto is hereby incorporated by reference this item.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K:
On September 8, 2004, a report on Form 8-K was filed with respect to Item 8.01.
On September 3, 2004, a report on Form 8-K was filed with respect to Item 8.01.
On August 31, 2004, a report on Form 8-K was filed with respect to Item 8.01.
On August 27, 2004, a report on Form 8-K was filed with respect to Item 8.01.
On August 4, 2004, a report on Form 8-K was filed with respect to Item 12.
31
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section l3 or l5(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of l934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
AMERICAN SPECTRUM REALTY, INC.
Date: November 12, 2004 |
By: |
/s/ William J. Carden |
|
|
William J. Carden |
|
|
Chairman of the Board, President, |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer and Acting |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
Date: November 12, 2004 |
By: |
/s/ Patricia A. Nooney |
|
|
Patricia A. Nooney |
|
|
Senior Vice President and Director of Accounting |
|
|
(Principal Accounting Officer) |
32
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit No. |
|
Exhibit Title |
|
|
|
31 |
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
33