UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
ý QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended August 31, 2004
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 0-14843
DPAC TECHNOLOGIES CORP.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
CALIFORNIA |
|
33-0033759 |
(State or other Jurisdiction of |
|
(IRS Employer |
Incorporation or Organization) |
|
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
7321 LINCOLN WAY |
||
GARDEN GROVE, CALIFORNIA 92841 |
||
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip) |
||
|
|
|
(714) 898-0007 |
||
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code) |
||
|
|
|
Not Applicable |
||
(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year |
||
If Changed Since Last Report) |
Indicate by Check Mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
YES |
ý |
NO |
o |
Indicate by Check Mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.)
YES |
o |
NO |
ý |
APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:
The number of shares of common stock, no par value, outstanding as of August 31, 2004 was 23,732,431
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. Financial Statements
DPAC Technologies Corp.
Condensed Balance Sheets
(Unaudited)
|
|
August 31, |
|
February 29, |
|
||
|
|
2004 |
|
2004 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
||
CURRENT ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
4,600,974 |
|
$ |
4,477,396 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
127,696 |
|
30,356 |
|
||
Inventories |
|
79,500 |
|
36,800 |
|
||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
299,464 |
|
323,065 |
|
||
Current assets of discontinued operations |
|
1,183,654 |
|
1,746,933 |
|
||
Total current assets |
|
6,291,288 |
|
6,614,550 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
PROPERTY, net |
|
248,022 |
|
263,994 |
|
||
GOODWILL |
|
4,528,721 |
|
4,528,721 |
|
||
OTHER ASSETS |
|
455,090 |
|
406,501 |
|
||
NON-CURRENT ASSETS OF DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS |
|
|
|
1,274,204 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
TOTAL |
|
$ |
11,523,121 |
|
$ |
13,087,970 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
||
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
427,423 |
|
$ |
335,937 |
|
Accrued compensation |
|
277,449 |
|
217,488 |
|
||
Accrued restructuring costs - current |
|
648,640 |
|
488,798 |
|
||
Other accrued liabilities |
|
231,255 |
|
104,330 |
|
||
Current liabilities of discontinued operations |
|
1,005,270 |
|
1,191,515 |
|
||
Total current liabilities |
|
2,590,037 |
|
2,338,068 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
ACCRUED RESTRUCTURING COSTS, Less current portion |
|
521,875 |
|
327,901 |
|
||
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES OF DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS |
|
639,234 |
|
361,039 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 14) |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Common stock |
|
27,322,275 |
|
25,517,837 |
|
||
Additional paid-in capital |
|
2,701,701 |
|
2,701,701 |
|
||
Accumulated deficit |
|
(22,252,001 |
) |
(18,158,576 |
) |
||
Net stockholders equity |
|
7,771,975 |
|
10,060,962 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
TOTAL |
|
$ |
11,523,121 |
|
$ |
13,087,970 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed financial statements.
2
DPAC Technologies Corp.
Condensed Statements of Operations
( Unaudited )
|
|
For the quarter ended: |
|
For the six months ended: |
|
||||||||
|
|
August 31, |
|
August 31, |
|
August 31, |
|
August 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
NET SALES |
|
$ |
222,696 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
623,368 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
COST OF SALES |
|
202,090 |
|
|
|
559,156 |
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
GROSS PROFIT |
|
20,606 |
|
|
|
64,212 |
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
COSTS AND EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Selling, general and administrative |
|
1,323,724 |
|
908,969 |
|
2,395,507 |
|
1,679,319 |
|
||||
Research and development |
|
383,922 |
|
414,986 |
|
697,818 |
|
731,440 |
|
||||
Restructuring charges |
|
488,427 |
|
|
|
573,215 |
|
|
|
||||
Total costs and expenses |
|
2,196,073 |
|
1,323,955 |
|
3,666,540 |
|
2,410,759 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS |
|
(2,175,467 |
) |
(1,323,955 |
) |
(3,602,328 |
) |
(2,410,759 |
) |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
OTHER INCOME: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Interest income |
|
7,829 |
|
12,954 |
|
15,292 |
|
30,493 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAX BENEFIT |
|
(2,167,638 |
) |
(1,311,001 |
) |
(3,587,036 |
) |
(2,380,266 |
) |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
INCOME TAX BENEFIT |
|
|
|
498,000 |
|
|
|
904,000 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
LOSS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS |
|
$ |
(2,167,638 |
) |
$ |
(813,001 |
) |
$ |
(3,587,036 |
) |
$ |
(1,476,266 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
GAIN (LOSS) FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS |
|
449,257 |
|
(278,261 |
) |
(506,389 |
) |
(547,562 |
) |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
NET LOSS |
|
$ |
(1,718,381 |
) |
$ |
(1,091,262 |
) |
$ |
(4,093,425 |
) |
$ |
(2,023,828 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
NET GAIN (LOSS) PER SHARE: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Continuing Operations - Basic and diluted |
|
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
$ |
(0.16 |
) |
$ |
(0.07 |
) |
Discontinued Operations - Basic and diluted |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
Net Loss - Basic and diluted |
|
$ |
(0.07 |
) |
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
$ |
(0.18 |
) |
$ |
(0.10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Basic and diluted |
|
23,732,000 |
|
21,010,000 |
|
22,904,000 |
|
20,999,000 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed financial statements.
3
DPAC Technologies Corp.
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
|
|
For the six months ended |
|
||||
|
|
August 31, |
|
August 31, |
|
||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net loss from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(3,587,036 |
) |
$ |
(1,476,266 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss from continuing operations to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
81,516 |
|
196,988 |
|
||
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
(904,000 |
) |
||
Compensation expense associated with stock options |
|
16,214 |
|
15,761 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Accounts receivable |
|
(97,340 |
) |
|
|
||
Inventories |
|
(42,700 |
) |
|
|
||
Other assets |
|
(23,100 |
) |
169,565 |
|
||
Accounts payable |
|
91,486 |
|
123,390 |
|
||
Accrued compensation |
|
59,961 |
|
32,736 |
|
||
Accrued restructuring charges |
|
353,816 |
|
|
|
||
Other accrued liabilities |
|
126,925 |
|
129,300 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
(3,020,258 |
) |
(1,712,526 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Property additions |
|
(67,432 |
) |
(27,131 |
) |
||
Acquired license agreement |
|
|
|
(375,000 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net cash used in investing activities: |
|
(67,432 |
) |
(402,131 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
1,788,224 |
|
23,750 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
1,788,224 |
|
23,750 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
NET CASH PROVIDED BY DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS |
|
1,423,044 |
|
1,046,226 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
123,578 |
|
(1,044,681 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD |
|
4,477,396 |
|
8,197,144 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD |
|
$ |
4,600,974 |
|
$ |
7,152,463 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Interest paid |
|
$ |
14,180 |
|
$ |
16,495 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE OF NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Acquisition of property under capital leases |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
385,961 |
|
On May 6, 2004, the Company sold its industrial, defense, and aerospace product line for $333,000 in cash. Included in the sale was net inventory of $148,000 and property with a net book value of $136,000.
One June 14, 2004, the Company sold its commercial memory stacking patents and patent applications and related excess inventory for $670,092 in cash.
See accompanying notes to condensed financial statements.
4
DPAC TECHNOLOGIES CORP.
NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE 1 - General Background
DPAC Technologies Corp. (formerly Dense-Pac Microsystems, Inc.) (we, us, DPAC or the Company) is a provider of wireless networking and connectivity products for machine-to-machine applications in the industrial, transportation, medical and other commercial markets. Our product is designed to enable OEM equipment designers to incorporate wireless local area network (LAN) connectivity for data collection and/or control, into their device, instrument or equipment through the inclusion of the Companys Wireless LAN Node Module. The wireless product was introduced in September 2003 after an initial year of research and development. During fiscal 2005 we sold our legacy product lines. The Company previously performed memory stacking services for use in computer servers and communications equipment and produced similar stacked memory products for the industrial, defense and aerospace markets. See Note 3 for significant events associated with our legacy product lines. We are incorporated as a California corporation, which occurred on September 7, 1983. In August 2001, we changed our name from Dense-Pac Microsystems, Inc. to DPAC Technologies Corp.
NOTE 2 - Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited interim Condensed Financial Statements of DPAC as of August 31, 2004 and for the three and six months ended August 31, 2004 and 2003, reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals and a restructuring charge) which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim periods presented. These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete-year financial statements. DPAC®, DPAC Technologies® and AirborneTM are registered trademarks of DPAC Technologies Corp.
These unaudited financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 29, 2004. Operating results for the three and six months ended August 31, 2004 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year ending February 28, 2005.
Some historical amounts have been reclassified to be consistent with the current financial presentation.
In August 2004, DPAC elected to apply and was approved for listing of its common stock (ticker: DPAC) on the Small Cap Market, in order to ensure the continuity of its Nasdaq listing after its stockholders equity balance had fallen below the $10 million level required for continued listing on the National Nasdaq Market.
On June 21, 2004, we received a letter from The Nasdaq Stock Market indicating that our common stock (ticker: DPAC) had failed to meet one of Nasdaqs continuing listing requirementsthat the closing bid price be at least $1.00 per share. The reported closing bid price was below $1.00 per share for the preceding 30 consecutive trading days before the date of the letter.
The Nasdaq letter gives us 180 days to regain compliance, or until December 20, 2004. To regain compliance, the closing bid price for shares of our common stock must be at or above $1.00 for any 10 consecutive trading days ending on or prior to December 20, 2004. We hope to regain compliance within the allowed period ending December 20, 2004. Additional time to regain compliance would be awarded us
5
only if we were to meet The Nasdaq Small Cap Market (the Small Cap Market) initial listing criteria (as set forth in Marketplace Rule 4420), except for the bid price requirement. We would presently satisfy all of the Nasdaq Small Cap Markets initial listing criteria (with the allowed exception of bid price), and therefore believe we could be eligible to be granted additional time to try to regain compliance, subject to the wide discretion of The Nasdaq Stock Market to decline for reasons of protecting the integrity of the Small Cap Market. If, however, we were to fail to meet all of the Small Cap Market initial listing requirements (with the exception of bid price) on December 20, 2004, the Nasdaq staff will provide written notification that our stock will be delisted. It is unknown at this time if DPAC will be able to regain compliance with the minimum bid price requirement in order to continue its common stock listing on the Nasdaq Small Cap market within the additional time allowed to regain compliance, and, if not, we would during the additional time allowed, if any, be required by the applicable rules and conditions of listing to formulate a plan to increase the bid price per listed share, ordinarily by conducting a reverse stock split.
NOTE 3 Liquidity
The Company has experienced losses for the last eight quarters. However, at August 31, 2004, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $4.6 million, working capital of $3.7 million and a current ratio of 2.4 to 1. This compares to a cash balance of $4.5 million, working capital of $4.3 million and a current ratio of 2.8 to 1 at February 29, 2004.
In order to meet its ongoing obligations for the next four quarters the Company is dependent on its current cash balances, approximately $300,000 received in September 2004 from the sale of production assets, approximately $200,000 expected to be generated from the reduction of working capital from discontinued operations, approximately $250,000 in cash to be received from the sale of the Digivision product license in the current quarter, future contingent consideration to be received from the sale of the IDA product line, if any, and the current credit facility. As further discussed in Note 4, management has made significant efforts during the last two quarters to reduce the use of cash. Managements business plan for the remainder of fiscal year 2005 and fiscal year 2006, anticipates a substantial increase in revenues generated from the sale of AirborneTM products expected to result from completion of design activities by its customers and a shift to production quantities from prototype and pre-production quantities. Should revenues from the introduction of the Airborne product line increase more slowly than anticipated, or should such revenue fail to reduce losses from the levels experienced in previous quarters, the Company will have to reduce the pace of its sales and product development efforts or it may find it necessary to seek additional equity or other types of financing as a means to continue its current operations and business development plans.
NOTE 4 - Discontinued Operations
As a result of the significant decline in the demand for the Companys existing stacking products experienced during fiscal year 2004, in the second half of fiscal year 2004 and continuing into fiscal year 2005, the Company implemented a number of restructuring initiatives to focus future endeavors of the Company on the Airborne product line.
On June 14, 2004, DPAC reached an agreement with Staktek Group L.P., a subsidiary of Staktek Holdings, Inc. to sell it DPACs memory stacking patent and patent applications associated with its commercial product line and related excess inventory for $670,000 in cash. Under the agreement, DPAC continued to accept agreed upon orders for LP Stacks subject to material and capacity availability through July 30, 2004 and all orders were scheduled for shipment no later than August 6, 2004. In conjunction with the sale, the Companys memory stacking product line was discontinued. This product line accounted for $16.3 million (or 83%) of the Companys net sales during fiscal year 2004 and $3.86 million (or 76%) of the Companys net sales for the six months ended August 31, 2004.
Discontinuing the Companys memory stacking product line in the second quarter of fiscal year 2005 culminated the Companys restructuring efforts. Accordingly, the Company planned to shut down its in-house manufacturing, dispose of all related manufacturing equipment and vacate the portion of its leased facility utilized for manufacturing purposes. We expect the completion of the shutdown of the
6
manufacturing process and the liquidation of the related assets to be completed during the third quarter of fiscal year 2005.
On May 6, 2004, DPAC reached an agreement with Twilight Technologies Corp. to sell DPACs industrial, defense and aerospace (IDA) memory product line. The agreement transferred all of our relevant licensed rights to the specified technology and product line, and certain inventory and assets for $0.33 million in cash and contingent future consideration based on the revenues of the product lines for the next two years. The amount of the additional consideration cannot yet be determined. The entire IDA product line, including royalty revenues, accounted for $3.16 million (or 16%) of the Companys net sales during fiscal year 2004 and $0.58 million (or 11%) of the Companys net sales for the six months ended August 31, 2004. In conjunction with the sale of the memory stacking product line as well as the shut down of the Companys manufacturing process, the Company determined that, after completing shipments of existing IDA orders, it would no longer have continuing significant involvement with the IDA product line. The product line was categorized as discontinued during the second quarter of fiscal year 2005.
In accordance with SFAS no. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, both the IDA and memory stacking product lines are classified as discontinued operations beginning in the second quarter of fiscal 2005, and the related financial results are reported separately as discontinued operations for all periods presented. Certain financial information regarding these product lines included in discontinued operations is set forth below:
|
|
Three Months Ended August 31, |
|
Six Months Ended August 31, |
|
||||||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||||
Revenue |
|
$ |
2,582,489 |
|
$ |
4,400,432 |
|
$ |
4,441,766 |
|
$ |
9,563,095 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
(220,835 |
) |
(449,261 |
) |
(1,227,081 |
) |
(883,562 |
) |
||||
Gain on the sale of assets |
|
670,092 |
|
|
|
720,692 |
|
|
|
||||
Gain (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax effect |
|
$ |
449,257 |
|
$ |
(278,261 |
) |
$ |
(506,389 |
) |
$ |
(547,562 |
) |
|
|
August 31, 2004 |
|
February 29, 2004 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Accounts receivable, net |
|
$ |
852,578 |
|
$ |
1,351,950 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
|
394,983 |
|
||
Property, net |
|
331,076 |
|
1,274,204 |
|
||
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,183,654 |
|
$ |
3,021,137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current portion of capital leases |
|
$ |
141,882 |
|
$ |
160,081 |
|
Accounts payable & accrued expenses |
|
296,192 |
|
867,832 |
|
||
Accrued restructuring costs - current |
|
567,196 |
|
83,418 |
|
||
Deferred revenue |
|
|
|
80,184 |
|
||
Total current liabilities |
|
1,005,270 |
|
1,191,515 |
|
||
Accrued restructuring costs- long term |
|
450,033 |
|
106,979 |
|
||
Capital leases, net of current portion |
|
189,201 |
|
254,060 |
|
||
Total Liabilities |
|
$ |
1,644,504 |
|
$ |
1,552,554 |
|
During the quarter ended August 31, 2004, the Company recorded net restructuring charges related to discontinued operations of $0.4 million, which included severance charges of $0.1 million and a
7
reserve for vacated excess facilities of $0.3 million. The severance charges are the result of a reduction in workforce of 10 individuals. The accrued severance charges are payable over the period ending December 31, 2006.
A summary of the activity that affected the Companys accrued restructuring costs for discontinued operations during the six months ended August 31, 2004 is as follows:
|
|
Employee |
|
Facilities |
|
Lease |
|
Total |
|
|||||
Balance at 2/29/04 |
|
$ |
90,397 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
$ |
190,397 |
|
|
Amounts expensed |
|
764,613 |
|
|
|
|
|
764,613 |
|
|||||
Amounts paid |
|
(84,211 |
) |
|
|
(30,000 |
) |
(114,211 |
) |
|||||
Balance at 5/31/04 |
|
770,799 |
|
|
|
70,000 |
|
840,799 |
|
|||||
Amounts expensed |
|
99,819 |
|
295,000 |
|
|
|
394,819 |
|
|||||
Amounts paid |
|
(188,389 |
) |
|
|
(30,000 |
) |
(218,389 |
) |
|||||
Balance 8/31/04 |
|
$ |
682,229 |
|
$ |
295,000 |
|
$ |
40,000 |
|
$ |
1,017,229 |
|
|
All of the charges reflected in the above table are included in gain or loss from discontinued operations in the accompanying financial statements. No additional impairment or restructuring charges are anticipated beyond those incurred in the quarter ended August 31, 2004. Refer to Note 12 for a summary of restructuring charges affecting continuing operations.
NOTE 5 Stock Based Compensation
Pursuant to SFAS 123, the Company has elected to continue using the intrinsic value method of accounting for stock-based awards granted to employees and directors in accordance with Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25 and related interpretations in accounting for its stock option and purchase plans. As a result, we only record compensation expense for stock-based awards granted with an exercise price below the market value of the Companys stock at the date of grant.
SFAS 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, as amended by SFAS 148, requires the disclosure of pro forma net income and earnings per share. Under SFAS 123, and as amended by SFAS 148, the fair value of stock-based awards to employees is calculated through the use of option-pricing models, even though such models were developed to estimate the fair value of freely tradable, fully transferable options without vesting restrictions, which significantly differ from the Companys stock option awards. These models also require subjective assumptions, including future stock price volatility and expected time to exercise, which greatly affect the calculated values.
The Companys calculations were made using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, with the following weighted-average assumptions:
|
|
For the three months ended |
|
For the six months ended |
|
||||
Assumptions |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected life months |
|
35 |
|
39 |
|
35 |
|
39 |
|
Stock volatility |
|
98 |
% |
103 |
% |
98 |
% |
103 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
3.2 |
% |
4 |
% |
3.2 |
% |
4 |
% |
Dividends during the expected term |
|
None |
|
None |
|
None |
|
None |
|
8
The Companys calculations are based on a single-option valuation approach and forfeitures are recognized as they occur. If the fair values of the awards had been amortized to expense over the vesting period of the awards, the Companys results would have been as follows:
|
|
For the three months ended |
|
For the six months ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||||
Loss from continuing operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
As reported |
|
$ |
(2,167,638 |
) |
$ |
(813,001 |
) |
$ |
(3,587,036 |
) |
$ |
(1,476,266 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add: Stock-based compensation expense included in reported net income |
|
16,214 |
|
9,004 |
|
16,241 |
|
9,772 |
|
||||
Deduct: Total stock-based compensation determined under fair value based method for all awards |
|
(197,669 |
) |
(239,644 |
) |
(366,416 |
) |
(467,332 |
) |
||||
Pro forma net loss from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(2,349,093 |
) |
$ |
(1,043,641 |
) |
$ |
(3,937,211 |
) |
$ |
(1,933,826 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Loss per share from continuing operations as reported: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Basic and Diluted |
|
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
$ |
(0.16 |
) |
$ |
(0.07 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Pro forma loss per share from continuing operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Basic and Diluted |
|
$ |
(0.10 |
) |
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
$ |
(0.17 |
) |
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
NOTE 6 - Concentration of Customers
As discussed in Note 3, the Company has sold its patents associated with its memory stacking product line which resulted in the discontinuance of that product line effective August 6, 2004. The Company has and will have customers ranging from large OEMs to startup operations. We have had limited prior collections experience with most of our customers. Any inability to collect receivables from any such customers could have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial position and liquidity.
NOTE 7 - Bank Credit Facility
The Company extended its bank credit facility until December 2004, providing for borrowings of up to 80% of eligible accounts receivable, as defined, not to exceed $2.0 million. Prior to the extension the facility provided for borrowings up to $3.0 million or up to a $1 million draw on a non-formulary basis. As of August 31, 2004, no amounts were outstanding and available borrowings were approximately $500,000, based on eligible accounts receivable. The credit facility bears interest at the banks prime rate plus 0.5% (4.5% at August 31, 2004), expires in December 2004, and is collateralized by all of the assets of the Company. The agreement requires the Company to maintain certain financial covenants that the Company was in compliance with at August 31, 2004. Such covenants also restrict the Companys ability to pay dividends on its common stock.
9
NOTE 8 - Stock Options
The following table summarizes stock option activity under DPACs 1985 and 1996 Stock Option Plans for the six- months ended August 31, 2004:
|
|
Number of |
|
Exercise Price |
|
Number of |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
Per Share |
|
Options Exercisable |
|
Balance, February 29, 2004 |
|
3,788,845 |
|
$0.94 - $7.56 |
|
2,672,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
918,000 |
|
$0.35 - $1.37 |
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
(5,000 |
) |
$1.00 - $1.00 |
|
|
|
Cancelled |
|
(302,725 |
) |
$0.94 - $6.00 |
|
|
|
Balance, August 31, 2004 |
|
4,399,120 |
|
$0.35 - $7.56 |
|
3,291,315 |
|
At August 31, 2004, a total of 3,092,800 shares were available for future grants under all of the Companys stock option plans. Included in the balance of 4,399,120 options outstanding are 2,260,750 options held by former employees.
NOTE 9 Net Loss Per Share
The Company computes net loss per share in accordance with SFAS No. 128, Earnings Per Share. Basic net loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted loss per share would reflect the potential dilution of securities by including other common stock equivalents, such as stock options and warrants, in the weighted-average number of shares outstanding, if dilutive. Such equivalents have been excluded in the table below because they are antidilutive.
The table below sets forth the reconciliation of the denominator of the loss per share calculations:
|
|
Three months ended |
|
||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
Shares used in computing basic net loss per share |
|
23,732,000 |
|
20,010,000 |
|
Dilutive effect of stock options(1) and warrants(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in computing diluted net loss per share |
|
23,732,000 |
|
20,010,000 |
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
Shares used in computing basic net loss per share |
|
22,904,000 |
|
20,999,000 |
|
Dilutive effect of stock options(1) and warrants(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in computing diluted net loss per share |
|
22,904,000 |
|
20,999,000 |
|
(1) Potential common shares of 10,000 and 24,000 have been excluded from diluted weighted average common shares for the three and six month periods ended August 31, 2004 and 188,000
10
and 174,000 have been excluded from diluted weighted average common shares for the three and six month periods ended August 31, 2003, as the effect would be anti-dilutive.
(2) Excluded from the diluted weighted average common shares for the three and six month periods ended August 31, 2004, are 2,514,410 warrants issued in conjunction with the private placement of common stock in the first quarter of fiscal year 2005. These options were excluded because the exercise prices of these options were greater than the average market price of our common stock for the referenced periods. There were no warrants outstanding as of August 31, 2003.
The number of shares of common stock, no par value, outstanding as of August 31, 2004 was 23,732,431.
NOTE 10 Segment Information
Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the Companys chief operating decision-maker, or decision-making group, in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. The Company reports as a single segment.
NOTE 11 Income Taxes
The Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the differences between the financial statement carrying values and the tax bases of assets and liabilities. The Company exercises significant judgment relating to the projection of future taxable income to determine the recoverability of any tax assets recorded on the balance sheet. DPAC regularly reviews its deferred tax assets for recoverability and establishes a valuation allowance based on historical taxable income, projected future taxable income, and the expected timing of the reversals of existing temporary differences. To the extent that recovery is not believed to be more likely than not, a valuation allowance is established. During the year ended February 29, 2004 and the first six months ended August 31, 2004, the Company established a full valuation allowance associated with its net deferred tax assets.
The valuation allowance was calculated in accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes (SFAS 109), which requires an assessment of both negative and positive evidence when measuring the need for a valuation allowance. Evidence evaluated by management included operating results during the most recent three-year period and future projections, with more weight given to historical results than expectations of future profitability, which are inherently uncertain. The Companys net losses in recent periods represented sufficient negative evidence to require a full valuation allowance against its net deferred tax assets under SFAS 109. This valuation allowance will be evaluated periodically and could be reversed partially or totally if business results shall have sufficiently improved to support realization of our deferred tax assets.
NOTE 12 Private Placement of Common Stock
On May 6, 2004, the Company completed a private placement of approximately 2.5 million shares of common stock for net proceeds of approximately $1.8 million. In conjunction with the sale of stock, the Company issued warrants to purchase additional common stock. The Series A warrants expire in five years and are exercisable for approximately 1.24 million additional shares of common stock to the investors at $1.24 per share. Of these Series A Warrants, 968,836 are called Restricted as they are not exercisable until November 5, 2004. The remaining Series A warrants are immediately exercisable. The Series B warrants expire 320 days after July 14, 2004 and are immediately exercisable for approximately 1.03 million additional shares of common stock to the investors at $.97 per share. The placement agent has received warrants to purchase approximately 238,000 shares of common stock at $1.07 per share that are not exercisable until November 5, 2004, and that will expire in five years. The warrants are callable by DPAC under certain conditions.
11
The Company valued the warrants using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:
(a) expected life equal to the contract life of each warrant,
(b) 100% volatility and 3.7% risk-free interest rate for the Series A and placement agent warrants, and
(c) 94% volatility and 1.5% risk-free interest rate for the Series B warrants.
This calculation resulted in the following valuations: $0.7 million for the Series A warrants, $0.24 million for the Series B warrants, and $0.14 million for the placement agent warrants. The value ascribed to the warrants has been treated as a reduction to common stock issued in the private placement.
NOTE 13 Restructuring Costs
As a result of the significant decline in the demand for the Companys stacking products experienced during fiscal year 2004, in the second half of fiscal year 2004 and continuing into fiscal year 2005, the Company implemented a number of restructuring initiatives to focus future endeavors of the Company on the Airborne product line and to transition to an outsourced manufacturing model.
During the quarter ended August 31, 2004, the Company recorded net restructuring charges affecting continuing operations of $0.49 million, which are comprised of severance charges as the result of a reduction in workforce of 3 individuals, including the Companys CFO. The accrued severance charges are payable over the period ending December 2006.
A summary of the activity that affected the Companys accrued restructuring costs of continuing operations during the six months ended August 31, 2004 is as follows:
|
|
Employee |
|
Balance at 2/29/04 |
|
816,699 |
|
Amounts expensed |
|
84,788 |
|
Amounts paid / incurred |
|
(104,360 |
) |
Balance at 5/31/04 |
|
797,127 |
|
Amounts expensed |
|
488,427 |
|
Amounts paid / incurred |
|
(115,039 |
) |
Balance 8/31/04 |
|
1,170,515 |
|
All of the charges reflected in the above table are included in restructuring charges of continuing operations in the accompanying financial statements. Refer to Note 3 for a summary of the restructuring charges affecting discontinued operations.
NOTE 14 Commitments and Contingencies
Legal Proceedings
On March 5, 2004 DPAC Technologies filed a Complaint against ATS Oregon, Inc. (ATS) in Superior Court for the State of California, Orange County. ATS was the equipment company contracted by DPAC Technologies to build the automated laser weld equipment for the DuraStack technology. The
12
Complaint alleges breach of contract, fraud by failure to disclose and active concealment, negligent misrepresentation and rescission. The Complaint seeks a return of all moneys paid to ATS of $408,000, actual damages, incidental and consequential damages, and punitive and exemplary damages in excess of $3.6 million. On April 22, 2004, ATS filed an Answer and Cross-Complaint against DPAC. The Cross-Complaint is for breach of contract for a stated amount of $492,000, and reasonable value of goods and services in excess of $800,000. On April 23, 2004, ATS filed a Notice of Removal to remove the action from state to federal court in the Central District of California, Southern Division. The case has been assigned Case No. SACV04-471 AHS (Mcx). The Company believes that it has meritorious defenses to ATS claims and intends to vigorously defend itself against those claims. This suit is currently scheduled for trial in September 2005.
Additionally, we are involved from time to time in a variety of legal and administrative proceedings and claims, which arise in the ordinary course of business. While the outcome of these claims cannot be predicted with certainty, we do not believe that the outcome of any currently pending legal matters will have a material adverse effect on the Company.
Litigation is expensive and demands time and attention of management, whether ultimately successful or not. Litigation often involves complex issues of procedure and substance, making outcome uncertain. Establishing proprietary rights in a competitive technological environment may be difficult and may require litigation, resulting in attendant costs, and such efforts may be unsuccessful. Parties in litigations with us may have greater economic resources than the Company has and may be able to more easily bear lengthy or extended proceedings, including appeals.
Other Contingent Contractual Obligations
Over time, the Company has made and continues to make certain indemnities, commitments and guarantees under which it may be required to make payments in relation to certain transactions. These include: indemnities to past, present and future directors, officers, employees and other agents pursuant to the Companys Articles, Bylaws, resolutions, agreements or otherwise; indemnities to various lessors in connection with facility leases for certain claims arising from such facility or lease; indemnities to vendors and service providers pertaining to claims based on the negligence or willful misconduct of the Company; and indemnities involving the accuracy of representations and warranties in certain contracts. The Company may also issue a guarantee in the form of a standby letter of credit as security for contingent liabilities under certain customer contracts. The duration of these indemnities, commitments and guarantees varies and, in certain cases, may be indefinite. The majority of these indemnities, commitments and guarantees may not provide for any limitation of the future payments that the Company could potentially be obligated to make. The Company has not recorded any liability for these indemnities, commitments and guarantees in the accompanying balance sheets. Product warranty costs have not been significant. The Company has had limited warranty-related experience with its the Airborne products.
ITEM 2 - Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the condensed financial statements and notes to those statements included elsewhere in this Report. This discussion contains certain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, such as statement of our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed here. The cautionary statements made in this Report should be read as being applicable to all forward-looking statements wherever they appear. Numerous important factors, risks and uncertainties affect our operations and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by these or any other forward-looking statements made by us or on our behalf. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include those discussed in the
13
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 29, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 1, 2004, as well as those discussed in this Item or elsewhere herein. We undertake no obligation to publicly release the result of any revisions to our forward-looking statements that may be required to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
Operating Losses
Our results of operations over the recent past have been losses. The primary factors that may in the future affect our results of operations include the timing of our customers initiating production orders and the amounts of such orders, fluctuating market demand for and declines in the selling prices of our products, decreases or increases in the costs of the components of our products, market acceptance of new products and enhanced versions of our products, our competitors selling products that compete with our products at lower prices or on better terms than we sell our products, delays in our introduction of new products or software bugs arising from our making enhancements to existing products, manufacturing inefficiencies, competition from new wireless products using newer technology, and challenges managing production from overseas suppliers.
Our operating results will be materially affected by our sale of the industrial, defense and aerospace product line as well as the sale of the LP memory stacking business. These two legacy product lines accounted for approximately $19.5 million (99%) of fiscal year 2004 net sales. The future revenues for DPAC will originate from the successful implementation of the Airborne wireless products and new product lines. There is no assurance that this product line will be successful or that sufficient revenues will be generated from this product line. The timing of revenue may be affected by the length of time it may take our customers in designing our Airborne product into their product lines and introducing their products. In addition, our revenues are ultimately limited by the success of our customers products in relation to their competition.
Our operating results may also be affected by the timing of new product announcements and releases by our competitors, the ability to produce products in volume, delays, cancellations or rescheduling of orders due to customer financial difficulties or other events, inventory obsolescence, including the reduction in value of our inventories due to price declines, unexpected product returns, the timing of expenditures in anticipation of increased sales, cyclicality in our targeted markets, and expenses associated with acquisitions. In particular, declines in 802.11 standard or similar technology prices could affect the valuation of our inventory, the pricing of services, which could result in adverse changes in our business, financial condition and results of operations
Sales of our individual products and product lines toward the end of a products life cycle are typically characterized by steep declines in sales, pricing and gross margin, the precise timing of which may be difficult to predict. We have experienced and could continue to experience unexpected reductions in sales of products as customers anticipate new product purchases. In addition, to the extent that we manufacture products in anticipation of future demand that does not materialize, or in the event a customer cancels outstanding orders during a period of either declining product-selling prices or decreasing demand, we could experience an unanticipated decrease in sales of products. These factors could give rise to charges for obsolete or excess inventory, returns of products by distributors, or substantial price protection charges or discounts. In the past, we have had to write-down and write-off excess or obsolete inventory. To the extent that we are unsuccessful in managing product transitions, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
From time to time, our customers may purchase products from us in large quantities over a short period of time, which may cause demand for our products to change rapidly. Due to these and other uncertainties associated with customers purchasing strategies, we may experience significant fluctuations in demand from our customers. Such fluctuations could cause a significant increase in demand that could exceed our suppliers production capacity and could negatively impact our ability to meet customers demands as well as potentially impact product quality. Alternatively, such fluctuations could cause a significant delay or reduction in revenues, which could have a material adverse effect on our business,
14
results of operations and financial condition. We cannot guarantee that a major customer will not reduce, delay or eliminate purchases from us, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
The need for continued significant expenditures for research and development, software and firmware enhancements, and ongoing customer service and support, among other factors, will make it difficult for us to reduce our operating expenses in any particular period if our expectations for net sales for that period are not met or our investment objective for future revenues streams need to continue for potential success. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that we will be able to be profitable in any future period.
We believe that period-to-period comparisons of our financial results are not necessarily meaningful and should not be relied upon as indications of good future performance. Due to the foregoing factors, it is likely that from time to time our operating results will be below the expectations of investors. In such events, the market price of our Common Stock or other securities would be materially and adversely affected.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
During the second quarter of fiscal year 2005, the Company announced the sale of DPACs packaged stacking patents and patent applications, which agreement included the provision that DPAC not ship any related stacking products after August 6, 2004. In the first quarter of fiscal year 2005, the Company announced the sale of certain of the industrial, defense and aerospace product line. Revenues from both of these products lines are included in discontinued operations for all periods presented in these financial statements. Any future revenues associated with these product lines, including royalty revenues, will be classified as being from discontinued operations.
Subsequent to August 2004, we anticipate the Companys revenue source from continuing operations will be sales of its AirborneTM wireless products.
Three Months Ended August 31, 2004 and 2003
Net Sales. Net sales for the quarter ended August 31, 2004 of $0.2 million consisted of sales of evaluation kits, prototype units and pre-production quantities of the Companys AirborneTM wireless product line. This compares to no sales in the same period in the prior fiscal year, a period in which the wireless product was still in a development stage.
Gross Profit. Gross profit for the quarter ended August 31,2004 was $0.02 million (or 10% of sales), as compared to none in the same period in the prior fiscal year when we had no sales of the Airborne wireless product. Gross margins are lower than we would be expecting in the future due to the fact that fixed manufacturing overhead costs are being allocated to prototype and pre-production quantities of product shipments. Our gross margins may be expected to increase as our customers begin ordering larger quantities of our product and the fixed cost base is spread over a larger volume of cost. See Forward-Looking Statements.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $0.4 million (or 46%) in the second quarter of fiscal year 2005 to $1.3 million from $0.9 million in the second quarter of the prior fiscal year. The increase is primarily related to increased spending on sales and marketing efforts to launch the Airborne wireless product line, which included expenditures for participating in trade shows, print advertising, web-site development and advertising, and increase sales and marketing personnel. We also incurred additional expenses on recruiting efforts during the quarter.
Research and Development. Research and development expenses for the quarter ended August 31, 2004 of $0.38 million decreased by $0.03 million or 7% from $0.41 million in the second quarter of the
15
prior fiscal year. The decrease in absolute dollars spent on research and development primarily is due to the shift of the Airborne product line to a production environment from a full development environment. The Company is continuing to invest in research and development to expand and develop new wireless products. See Forward-Looking Statements.
Interest. For the three months ended August 31, 2004, interest income decreased by $5,000 from the same period last year due to lower average cash balances available to earn interest.
Income Taxes. During the quarter ended August 31, 2003, an income tax benefit of $0.5 million was recorded as a result of the determination by management that the future realization of the net deferred tax assets was judged to be more likely than not. In the third fiscal quarter of fiscal year 2004, a full valuation allowance was recorded against the related deferred tax assets. No income tax benefit has been provided during the quarter ended August 31, 2004. Recent net operating losses represent sufficiently negative evidence to require a continued valuation allowance against the net deferred tax assets. This valuation allowance will be evaluated periodically and could be reversed partially or totally if business results have sufficiently improved to support realization of our deferred tax assets.
Discontinued Operations. The gain from discontinued operations for the second quarter ended August 31, 2004 was $0.45 million compared to a net loss of $0.28 million for the same period in the prior fiscal year. The gain in the current fiscal period included a gain from operations of $0.17 million, restructuring costs of $0.39 million, and a gain of $0.67 million on the sale of the stacking technology and excess inventory during the quarter. The prior year quarter included a loss from operations of $0.45 million offset by a tax benefit of $0.17 million.
Six Months Ended August 31, 2004 and 2003
Net Sales. Net sales for the six months ended August 31, 2004 of $0.6 million consisted of sales of evaluation kits, prototype units and pre-production quantities of the Companys AirborneTM wireless product line, including an engineering development contract of $0.15 million. This compares to no sales in the same period in the prior fiscal year, a period in which the wireless product was still in development.
Gross Profit. Gross profit for the six months ended August 31, 2004 of $0.06 million (or 10% of sales), as compared to zero gross profit in the same period of the previous fiscal year, as there was no revenue during that period. Gross margins are lower than may be expected in the future due to the fact that fixed manufacturing overhead costs are being allocated to prototype and pre-production quantities of product shipments. Our gross margins may be expected to increase as our customers begin ordering larger quantities of our product and the fixed cost base is spread over a larger volume of cost. See Forward-Looking Statements.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. For the six months ended August 31, 2004, selling, general and administrative expenses of $2.4 million increased by $0.7 million or 42% from $1.7 million for the same period in the previous fiscal year. The increase is due to increased spending on sales and marketing efforts related to launching the Airborne wireless product line, which includes expenditures for participating in trade shows, print advertising, web development and advertising, and increased headcount of sales and marketing personnel.
Research and Development. Research and development expenses for the six months ended August 31, 2004 of $0.7 million decreased by $0.03 million or 4% from $0.73 million in the second quarter of the prior fiscal year. The decrease in research and development expense is primarily due to the shift of the Airborne product line to a production environment from a full development environment. The Company is continuing to invest in research and development to expand and develop new wireless products. See Forward-Looking Statements.
16
Interest. Interest income decreased by $15,000 for the six months ended August 31, 2004 from the same period in the prior fiscal year due lower average cash balances available to earn interest.
Income Taxes. During the six months ended August 31, 2003, an income tax benefit of $0.9 million was recorded as a result of the determination by management that the future realization of the net deferred tax assets was judged to be more likely than not. In the third fiscal quarter of fiscal year 2004, a full valuation allowance was recorded against the related deferred tax assets. No income tax benefit has been provided during the six months ended August 31, 2004. Recent net operating losses represent sufficiently negative evidence to require a continued valuation allowance against the net deferred tax assets. This valuation allowance will be evaluated periodically and could be reversed partially or totally if business results have sufficiently improved to support realization of our deferred tax assets.
Discontinued Operations. The net loss from discontinued operations for the six months ended August 31, 2004 was $0.5 million as compared to a net loss of $0.55 million for the same period in the prior fiscal year. The net loss in the current fiscal period consisted of a loss from operations of $1.2 million, including restructuring costs of $1.1 million, which were partially offset by a gain of $0.7 million on the sale of memory stacking technology, including excess inventory, and the IDA product line during the period. The net loss from discontinued operations for the six months ended August 31, 2003 of $0.55 million consisted of a loss from operations of $0.88 million, including a reserve for settlement of a patent infringement litigation of $0.75 million, partially offset by an income tax benefit of $0.33million.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The Companys primary source of operating capital for the six months ended August 31, 2004 was our cash balances, cash provided by issuing common stock in a private placement which netted approximately $1.8 million in cash, and cash of $1.0 million generated from the sale of the memory stacking technology and IDA product lines.
Net cash used in operating activities during the six months ended August 31, 2004 of approximately $3.0 million consisted of the net loss from continuing operations of $3.6 million partially offset by non-cash depreciation and amortization expense and an increase in accrued operating liabilities. The net loss for continuing operations includes $0.57 million for severance costs. Net cash used in operating activities during the six months ended August 31, 2003 of approximately $1.7 million consisted of the net loss from continuing operations of $1.5 million and deferred income taxes of $0.9 million, partially off-set by non-cash depreciation and amortization expense and an increase in accrued operating liabilities.
Net cash used in investing activities for the six months ended August 31, 2004 of $0.07 million consisted of equipment purchases. Net cash used in investing activities for the six months ended August 31, 2003 consisted primarily of a technology license purchase. The Company expects that it will not acquire more than $0.3 million in additional equipment for the remainder of the fiscal year. See Forward-Looking Statements.
On June 14, 2004, DPAC reached an agreement with Staktek Group L.P., a subsidiary of Staktek Holdings, Inc. to sell DPACs memory stacking patent and patent applications associated with its commercial product line and related excess inventory for $0.67 million in cash. Under the agreement, DPAC continued to accept agreed upon orders for LP Stacks subject to material and capacity availability through July 30, 2004 and all orders were scheduled for shipment no later than August 6, 2004. In conjunction with this sale, the Companys commercial product line was discontinued in August 2004. This product line accounted for $16.3 million (or 83%) of the Companys net sales during fiscal year 2004 and $3.86 million (or 76%) of the Companys net sales for the six months ended August 31, 2004.
17
On May 6, 2004, DPAC reached an agreement with Twilight Technologies Corp., a California Corporation, to sell certain of DPACs industrial, defense and aerospace (IDA) memory product line. The agreement transferred all of our relevant licensed rights to the specified technology and product line, and certain inventory and assets for $0.33 million in cash and contingent future consideration based on the revenues of the product lines for the next two years. The amount of the additional consideration cannot yet be determined. This entire product line accounted for $3.2 million (16%) of the Companys net sales during fiscal year 2004 and $0.58 million (or 11%) of the Companys net sales for the six months ended August 31, 2004.
Net cash provided by financing activities of $1.8 million and $0.02 million for the six months ended August 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, was from the issuance of shares of the Companys common stock.
On July 9, 2004, DPAC completed an agreement with DigiVision, Inc. to sell the exclusive marketing and manufacturing rights for the Advanced Targeting Forward Looking Infrared (AT-FLIR) advanced imaging system. DPAC originally acquired the rights from DigiVision in June of 2003. Under the agreement, DPAC is to receive a percentage of the selling price on future orders for the AT-FLIR product up to a maximum consideration of $375,000, equal to the amount originally paid by DPAC for the license.
As of August 31, 2004, our future commitments under capital leases through fiscal year 2007 were $0.36 Million. DPAC operates at leased premises in Southern California.
As of August 31, 2004, expected future cash obligations, related to contractual agreements were as follows:
|
|
Total |
|
Less than 1 Year |
|
1 to 3 Years |
|
|||
Capital Lease Obligations |
|
$ |
362,000 |
|
$ |
160,000 |
|
$ |
202,000 |
|
Operating Lease Obligations |
|
$ |
809,000 |
|
$ |
322,000 |
|
$ |
487,000 |
|
Purchase Obligations |
|
$ |
458,000 |
|
$ |
458,000 |
|
|
|
|
Severance Agreements |
|
$ |
1,853,000 |
|
$ |
1,062,000 |
|
$ |
791,000 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,482,000 |
|
$ |
2,002,000 |
|
$ |
1,480,000 |
|
The Company has available a bank credit facility providing for borrowings of up to 80% of eligible accounts receivable, as defined, not to exceed $2.0 million. As of August 31, 2004, no amounts were outstanding and available borrowings were approximately $500,000 based on eligible accounts receivable. The credit facility bears interest at the banks prime rate plus 0.5% (4.5% at August 31, 2004), expires in December 2004, and is collateralized by the assets of the Company. The agreement requires the Company to maintain certain financial covenants that the Company was in compliance with at August 31, 2004. Such covenants also restrict the Companys ability to pay dividends on its common stock.
Management believes that our positive cash position, together with proceeds of approximately $300,000 received in September 2004 from the sale of production assets, approximately $200,000 expected to be generated from the reduction of working capital from discontinued operations, approximately $250,000 in cash to be received from the sale of the Digivision product license in the current quarter, future contingent consideration to be received from the sale of the Industrial, Defense and Aerospace (IDA) product line and the current credit facility will be adequate to continue to maintain liquidity for the next twelve months. Managements business plan anticipates a substantial increase in the amount of revenues generated from the sale of AirborneTM products over the next few quarters expected to result from completion of design activities by its customers and a shift to production quantities from prototype and pre-production quantities. Should these revenues from the introduction of the Airborne product line increase more slowly than anticipated, or should the Companys revenue stream fail to reduce losses from the levels experienced in the past two quarters, the Company may find it necessary to seek additional equity financing or other financing as a means to continue to implement our plans. There can be no assurance that additional financing would be available if and when needed on terms favorable to the
18
company; and any future sale of our equity securities could dilute or subordinate the ownership interest of existing shareholders. Alternatively, or in addition, we may at some point determine to reduce the pace or scope of our sales, marketing and product development activities and overhead expenses in order to reduce cash usage to a self-sustaining rate. Since the Companys business involves the sale of a new product into a new marketplace, there is no history upon which to base our expectations for the timing and volume of revenues. The actual amount and timing of working capital requirements in future periods may vary significantly depending on many factors, including but not limited to future revenues.
OFF BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
We do not have any material off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our results of operations or financial condition.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Among the significant estimates affecting our condensed financial statements are those relating to allowances for doubtful accounts, inventories, goodwill, deferred taxes, stock based compensation and revenue recognition. We regularly evaluate our estimates and assumptions based upon historical experience and various other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. To the extent actual results differ from those estimates, our future results of operations may be affected. Detailed information on these critical accounting policies is included under the section entitled Critical Accounting Polices and Estimates on pages 17 through 19 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 29, 2004. Management believes that as of August 31, 2004, there has been no material change to this information.
RISK FACTORS
Please read and consider all of the factors mentioned in the following pages. We describe these factors because they could be very material to the Companys results. All of the beliefs and oral statements that we or our directors, officers or agents have made, make herein, or may hereafter make about the Companys present or future prospects are hereby qualified in their entirety by the additional statement that each of these beliefs and statements is subject to material changes over time and at any time on account of each of these risks and uncertainties:
Product Development and Technological Change
We are selling a product that becomes incorporated into a larger product that is sold to an end user. The design of the larger product, and the key decision concerning to include our product therein, is the responsibility of another company, and our progress cannot exceed the pace of our own customers progress between design and manufacturing of the larger product. Also, our customers plans can change due to causes related to the customers situation and may be beyond our control. Our customers design program for the larger products could end suddenly and without notice. The cost to us of the sales and design effort makes every potential customer very important.
19
Insofar as reasonably possible, we are planning to sell the product as we currently have available; however, actual and potential customers may require us to design a customized product. This can be costly whether or not it results in sales. The wireless industry is characterized by rapid technological change and is highly competitive with respect to timely product innovation. Wireless products we make will be subject to obsolescence or price erosion. As a result, wireless products we develop should have a product life of not more than one to three years. A more sudden change in market preferences is possible.
Our future success depends on our ability to market, sell and make our new Airborne wireless products. As and when we think it necessary, we may from time to time want to produce enhancements to keep up with technological advances or to meet customer needs. Any failure by us to anticipate or respond adequately to new developments and customer requirements, or any significant delays in product development, firmware or software development, or introduction of wireless technologies could make an introduction of new products financially unsuccessful. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in planned product development or marketing efforts, or that we will have adequate financial or technical resources for planned product development and promotion.
Uncertainty of Market Acceptance of New Product
The introduction of new products, such as our product for the wireless marketplace, could require the expenditure of an unknown amount of funds for research and development, tooling, software development, manufacturing processes, inventory and marketing. The amount of funding than we have available to us may not be sufficient. In order to successfully develop products, we will need to successfully anticipate market needs and may need to overcome rapid technological change and competition.
We are inexperienced in the wireless industry, and our plans in that industry are unproven. Our current management does not have a great deal of experience in marketing and selling the Airborne product.
We have limited marketing capabilities and resources and are dependent upon internal sales and marketing personnel and a network of independent sales representatives for the marketing and sale of our products. There can be no assurance that our product will achieve or maintain market acceptance, result in increased revenues, or be profitable.
Non-Compliance for Continued NASDAQ Listing
Our common stock is traded on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market. Continued listing is subject to meeting various numeric requirements. Our listing could lapse on short notice for reasons that may be beyond our control.
On June 21, 2004, we received a letter from The Nasdaq Stock Market indicating that our common stock (ticker: DPAC) had failed to meet one of Nasdaqs continuing listing requirementsthat the closing bid price be at least $1.00 per share. The reported closing bid price was below $1.00 per share for the preceding 30 consecutive trading days before the date of the letter. The Nasdaq letter informs us that there will be 180 days to regain compliance with this requirement, or until December 20, 2004. To regain compliance, the closing bid price for shares of our common stock must be at or above $1.00 for any 10 consecutive trading days ending on or prior to December 20, 2004. Additional time to regain compliance would be awarded us only if we were then to meet The Nasdaq SmallCap Market (the Small Cap Market) initial listing criteria (as set forth in Marketplace Rule 4420), except for the bid price requirement. By December 20, 2004, unless we regain compliance with the $1.00 minimum bid price requirement, the Nasdaq Staff will provide written notification that our common stock will be delisted or, at our request and under appropriate circumstances, providing us with one additional compliance period of 180 days. Unless we regain compliance with all of the requirements for continued listing, we may have no alternative but to allow our common stock to be delisted, which could materially and adversely affect the liquidity of the trading market. Also, we may also fall below other numerical listing requirements. Failure to cure such shortfall and any other noncompliance by December 20, 2004 could lead to delisting by Nasdaq. Any
20
extension of the compliance period could be conditioned upon our committing to take action, such as a reverse stock split, in order to try to cause our minimum bid price to exceed $1.00. A reverse stock split is not guaranteed to increase the bid price.
Parts Shortages and Over-Supplies and Dependence on Suppliers
The electronics and components industry is characterized by periodic shortages or over-supplies of parts that have in the past and may in the future negatively affect our operations. We are dependent on a limited number of suppliers for wireless devices used in our products, and we have no long-term supply contracts with any of them.
In order to achieve high volume production, we will need to out-source production to third parties or enter into licensing arrangements and be successful in the management of sub-contractors. Due to the cyclical nature of these industries and competitive conditions, we, or our sub-contractors, may experience difficulties in meeting our supply requirements in the future. Any inability to obtain adequate deliveries of parts, either due to the loss of a supplier or industry-wide shortages, could delay shipments of our products, increase our cost of goods sold and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Credit Risks
We will be granting credit to customers in a variety of commercial industries. Credit is extended based on an evaluation of the customers financial condition and collateral is not required. Estimated credit losses are provided for in the financial statements. Prior years have had substantially large customers as part of the accounts receivable balance. During the three and six months ended August 31, 2004, sales to one major customer accounted for 63% and 53% of net sales. Accounts receivable from this customer account for 39% of total net accounts receivable at August 31, 2004. During the three and six months ended August 31, 2003, sales to three major customers accounted for 53%, 12% and 14%, and 23%, 23% and 30%, respectively, of net sales. Accounts receivable from these three customers accounted for 53% of total net accounts receivable at August 31, 2003. Our inability to collect receivables from any of our significant customers could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. The model for accounts receivable for wireless customers may be substantially different than that of the customers that purchased our legacy products. Many of our wireless receivables may come from smaller, higher risk companies.
Intellectual Property Rights
Our ability to compete effectively is dependent on our proprietary know-how and technology. We primarily depend on maintaining the confidentiality of our trade secrets in order to protect our products from competition. Our trade secrets are subject to inadvertent or intentional disclosure, which could destroy or diminish the protection of our trade secrets. We have applied for one patent in the wireless area. There can be no assurance that our patent application will be approved or that any potentially issued patent will afford our products any competitive advantage. Our intellectual property rights could from time to time be challenged or circumvented by third parties. Patents issued to others may also adversely affect the commercialization of our present or future products.
We are involved from time to time in claims and litigation over intellectual property rights, which may adversely affect our ability to manufacture and sell our product. The electronics and the wireless industry is characterized by vigorous protection and pursuit of intellectual property rights. We believe that it may be necessary, from time to time, to initiate litigation against one or more third parties to preserve our intellectual property rights. In addition, from time to time, we have received, and may continue to receive in the future, notices that claim we have infringed upon, misappropriated or misused other parties proprietary rights, which claims could result in litigation. Such litigation would likely result in significant expense to us and divert the efforts of our technical and management personnel. In the event of an
21
adverse result in such litigation, we could be required to pay substantial damages, cease the manufacture, use and sale of certain products, expend significant resources to develop non-infringing technology, discontinue the use of certain processes or obtain licenses to use the infringed technology. Such a license may not be available on commercially reasonable terms, if at all. Our failure to obtain a license or our failure to obtain a license on commercially reasonable terms could cause us to incur substantial costs and suspend manufacturing products using the infringed technology. If we obtain a license, we would likely be required to make royalty payments for sales under the license. Such payments would increase our costs of revenues and reduce our gross profit. In addition, any litigation, whether as plaintiff or as defendant, would likely result in significant expense to us and divert the efforts of our technical and management personnel, whether or not such litigation is ultimately determined in our favor. In addition, the results of any litigation are inherently uncertain.
Management of New Product Introduction
Success of the Companys plans will depend on the ability to obtain new customers, to attract and retain skilled management and other personnel, to secure adequate sources of supply on commercially reasonable terms and to successfully manage new product introductions. To manage effectively, we will have to continue to implement and improve our operational, financial and management information systems, procedures and controls. We may from time to time experience constraints that will adversely affect our ability to satisfy customer demand in a timely fashion. Failure to manage growth or diversification effectively could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Our historic sources of revenues have been substantially eliminated by our sale of our legacy industrial, defense and aerospace product line as well as the sale of our legacy LP memory business. The future revenues for DPAC will depend on a successful implementation of the wireless products and future product lines. There is no assurance that the Airborne product line will be successful or that sufficient revenues will be generated from this product line. The timing of revenue may be adversely affected by competitors new product announcements or the challenges of our customers designing the Airborne product into their product lines.
Competition
There are companies that offer or are in the process of developing similar type of wireless product, including Lantronix, Digi-International and others. Some of these companies have greater financial, manufacturing and marketing capabilities than we have. We could also experience competition from established and emerging network companies. There can be no assurance that our products will be competitive with existing or future products, or that we will be able to establish or maintain a profitable price structure for our products.
We expect to face competition from existing competitors and new and emerging companies that may enter our existing or future markets with similar or alternative products, which may be less costly or provide additional features. In addition, some of our significant suppliers are also our competitors, many of whom have the ability to manufacture competitive products at lower costs as a result of their higher levels of integration. We also face competition from current and prospective customers that evaluate our capabilities against the merits of manufacturing products internally. Competition may arise due to the development of cooperative relationships among our current and potential competitors or third parties to increase the ability of their products to address the needs of our prospective customers. Accordingly, it is possible that new competitors or alliances among competitors will emerge and rapidly acquire significant market share.
We expect our competitors will continue to improve the performance of their current products, reduce their prices and introduce new products that may offer greater performance and improved pricing, any of which could cause a decline in sales or loss of market acceptance of our products. In addition, our competitors may develop enhancements to or future generations of competitive products that may render our technology or products obsolete or uncompetitive.
22
Product Liability
In the course of our business, we may be subject to claims for product liability for which our insurance coverage is excluded or inadequate.
Variability of Gross Margin
Gross profit as a percentage of sales was 9% for the three months ended August 31, 2004 and 10% for the six months ended August 31, 2004. Any change in the gross margins can typically be attributed to the revenue level. As we market our products the product mix may be different and result in changes in the gross margin.
We expect that our net sales and gross margin may vary significantly based on these and other factors, including the mix of products sold and the manufacturing services provided, the channels through which our products are sold, changes in product selling prices and component costs, the level of manufacturing efficiencies achieved and pricing by competitors. The selling prices of our products may decline depending upon the price changes of our cost of sales, which would have a material adverse effect on our net sales and could, have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operation. Accordingly, our ability to maintain or increase net sales will be highly dependent upon our ability to increase unit sales volumes of existing products and to introduce and sell new products in quantities sufficient to compensate for the anticipated declines in selling prices. Declining product-selling prices may also materially and adversely affect our gross margin unless we are able to reduce our cost per unit to offset declines in product selling prices. There can be no assurance that we will be able to increase unit sales volumes, introduce and sell new products or reduce our cost per unit. We also expect that our business may experience significant seasonality to the extent it sells a material portion of our products in Europe (due to vacation cycles) and to the extent, our exposure to the personal computer market remains significant.
Our average sales prices have historically declined, and we anticipate that the average sales prices for our products will continue to decline and could negatively impact our gross profit margins.
Decline of Demand for Product Due to Downturn of Related Industries
We may experience substantial period-to-period fluctuations in operating results due to factors affecting the wireless, computer, telecommunications and networking industries. From time to time, each of these industries has experienced downturns, often in connection with, or in anticipation of, declines in general economic conditions. A decline or significant shortfall in growth in any one of these industries or a technology shift, could have a material adverse impact on the demand for our products, and therefore, a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. There can be no assurance that our net sales and results of operations will not be materially and adversely affected in the future due to changes in demand from individual customers or cyclical changes in the wireless, computer, telecommunications, networking or other industries utilizing our products.
International Sales
The Company expects to sell its Airborne wireless products internationally. Foreign sales are made in U.S. dollars. International sales may be subject to certain risks, including changes in regulatory requirements, tariffs and other barriers, timing and availability of export licenses, political and economic instability, difficulties in accounts receivable collections, natural disasters, difficulties in staffing and managing foreign subsidiary and branch operations, difficulties in managing distributors, difficulties in
23
obtaining governmental approvals for telecommunications and other products, foreign currency exchange fluctuations, the burden of complying with a wide variety of complex foreign laws and treaties, potentially adverse tax consequences and uncertainties relative to regional, political and economic circumstances. Moreover and as a result of currency changes and other factors, certain of our competitors may have the ability to manufacture competitive products in Asia at lower costs than we can manufacture them.
We are also subject to the risks associated with the imposition of legislation and regulations relating to the import or export of high technology products. We cannot predict whether the United States or other countries will implement quotas, duties, taxes or other charges or restrictions upon the importation or exportation of our products. Because sales of our products have been denominated to date in United States dollars, increases in the value of the United States dollar could increase the price of our products so that they become relatively more expensive to customers in the local currency of a particular country, leading to a reduction in sales and profitability in that country. Future international activity may result in increased foreign currency denominated sales. Gains and losses on the conversion to United States dollars of accounts receivable, accounts payable and other monetary assets and liabilities arising from international operations may contribute to fluctuations in our results of operations. Some of our customers purchase orders and agreements are governed by foreign laws, which may differ significantly from United States laws. Therefore, we may be limited in our ability to enforce any rights under such agreements and to collect damages, if awarded. These factors could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Limited Experience in Acquisitions
We may pursue selective acquisitions to complement our internal growth. If we make any future acquisitions, we could issue stock that would dilute our shareholders percentage ownership, incur substantial debt, assume contingent liabilities, or use other company assets available at the time of acquisition. We have limited experience in acquiring other businesses, product lines and technologies. In addition, the attention of our small management team may be diverted from our core business if we undertake an acquisition. Potential acquisitions also involve numerous risks, including, among others:
Problems assimilating the purchased operations, technologies or products;
Costs associated with the acquisition;
Adverse effects on existing business relationships with suppliers and customers;
Sudden market changes;
Risks associated with entering markets in which we have no or limited prior experience;
Potential loss of key employees of purchased organizations; and
Potential litigation arising from the acquired companys operations before the acquisition.
Our inability to overcome problems encountered in connection with such acquisitions could divert the attention of management, utilize scarce corporate resources and harm our business. In addition, we are unable to predict whether or when any prospective acquisition candidate will become available or the likelihood that any acquisition will be completed.
Cyclical Nature of Wireless and Electronics Industries
The wireless and the electronics industry; is highly cyclical and is characterized by constant and rapid technological change, rapid product obsolescence and price erosion, evolving standards, short product life
24
cycles and wide fluctuations in product supply and demand. The industry has experienced significant downturns, often connected with, or in anticipation of, maturing product cycles of both the producing companies and their customers products and declines in general economic conditions. These downturns have been characterized by diminished product demand, production overcapacity, high inventory levels and accelerated erosion of average selling prices. Any future downturns could have a material adverse effect on our business and operating results. Furthermore, any upturn in these industries could result in increased demand for, and possible shortages of, components we use to manufacture and assemble our products. Such shortages could have a material adverse effect on our business and operating results.
Product Returns and Order Cancellation
To the extent, we manufacture products in anticipation of future demand that does not materialize, or in the event a customer cancels outstanding orders, we could experience an unanticipated increase in our inventory. In addition, while we may not be contractually obligated to accept returned products, and have typically not done so in the past, we may determine that it is in our best interest to accept returns in order to maintain good relations with our customers. Product returns would increase our inventory and reduce our revenues. We have had to write-down inventory in the past for reasons such as obsolescence, excess quantities and declines in market value below our costs.
We have no long-term volume commitments from our customers that are not subject to cancellation by the customer. Sales of our products are made through individual purchase orders and, in certain cases, are made under master agreements governing the terms and conditions of the relationships. Customers may change, cancel or delay orders with limited or no penalties. We have experienced cancellations of orders and fluctuations in order levels from period-to-period and we expect to continue to experience similar cancellations and fluctuations in the future that could result in fluctuations in our revenues.
Additional Capital Funding Could Impair Value of DPAC Common Stock
We anticipate that we may need to raise additional equity capital, possibly through public or private equity offerings. Our future capital requirements depend on many factors including our research, development, sales and marketing activities. We do not know whether additional financing will be available when needed, or will be available on terms favorable to us. If we cannot raise needed funds on acceptable terms, we may not be able to continue to develop or enhance our product, take advantage of current or future opportunities or respond to competitive pressures or customer requirements. To the extent we raise additional capital by issuing equity securities, our shareholders may experience substantial dilution. Any new issuance of equity securities may have greater rights, preferences or privileges than our existing common stock. Our authorized capital stock includes preferred stock that can be issued with various rights, preferences and privileges that are senior to our common stock, and such preferred shares may be issued in the discretion of the Board of Directors and without a vote by the shareholders.
Goodwill Impairment
The Company currently reports as a single segment reporting company. We currently have goodwill recorded in the balance sheet as an asset relating to the single segment. The net realizable value on the carrying value of the goodwill is calculated based on the fair value of the company versus the assets and liabilities recorded. If the fair value of the Company is reduced, it may impair the carrying value of goodwill and the Company may experience a decrease in the carrying value of the goodwill. It is unknown if the fair value will continue to be sufficient and not impair the carrying value of the goodwill. Because the Company sold two of its significant product lines in the second quarter of fiscal year 2005, the Company conducted an analysis its fair value in accordance with SFAS 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, to determine if any potential impairment of goodwill had occurred. The Company determined that the fair value of the Company was sufficient to warrant the valuation of goodwill and that no impairment had occurred. If the Company is not able to achieve its growth and profitability objectives for the Airborne wireless product line, the goodwill could become impaired in the future.
25
Geographic Concentration of Operation
For the wireless products none of our manufacturing operations are located in our facility in Garden Grove, California. Our wireless product line is manufactured overseas in Taiwan, with some contract manufacturing conducted locally. Due to the geographic concentration, a disruption of the manufacturing operations, resulting from sustained process abnormalities, human error, government intervention or natural disasters such as earthquakes, fires or floods could cause us to cease or limit our sub-contractors operations and consequently harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Compliance with Environmental Laws and Regulations
We are subject to a variety of environmental laws and regulations governing, among other things, air emissions, waste water discharge, waste storage, treatment and disposal, and remediation of releases of hazardous materials. Our failure to comply with present and future requirements could harm our ability to continue manufacturing our products. Such requirements could require us to acquire costly equipment or to incur other significant expenses to comply with environmental regulations. The imposition of additional or more stringent environmental requirements, the results of future testing at our facilities, or a determination that we are potentially responsible for remediation at other sites where problems are not presently known to us, could result in expenses in excess of amounts currently estimated to be required for such matters.
Key Personnel
The Company may fail to attract or retain the qualified technical sales, marketing and managerial personnel required to operate its business successfully.
DPACs future success depends, in part, upon ability to attract and retain highly qualified technical, sales, marketing and managerial personnel. Personnel with the necessary expertise are scarce and competition for personnel with proper skills is intense. Also, attrition in personnel can result from, among other things, changes related to acquisitions, as well as retirement or disability. The Company may not be able to retain existing key technical, sales, marketing and managerial employees or be successful in attracting, assimilating or retaining other highly qualified technical, sales, marketing and managerial personnel in the future. If the Company is unable to retain existing key employees or is unsuccessful in attracting new highly qualified employees, business, financial condition and results of operations of DPAC could be materially and adversely affected.
Volatility and Stock Price
The trading volume of our common stock has been somewhat sporadic in recent months. This can create an illiquid market in which any sales or purchases have a noticeable affect on the price of the stock. It may be difficult for an investor to dispose of a position in the common stock.
The stock market in general, and the market for shares of technology companies in particular, has experienced extreme price fluctuations. These price fluctuations are often unrelated to the operating performance of the affected companies. Many technology companies, including us, have experienced dramatic volatility in the market prices of their common stock. If our future operating results are below the expectations of stock market analysts and investors, our stock price may decline. We cannot be certain that the market price of our common stock will remain stable in the future. Our stock price may undergo fluctuations that are material, adverse and unrelated to our performance.
26
ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
The Company invests excess cash in money market funds. Money market funds do not have maturity dates and do not present a material market risk. For the three-month period covered by this Report, interest expense was not sensitive to any changes in the general level of United States interest rates because our debt instruments, consisting principally of capital lease agreements, were based on fixed interest rates.
ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures.
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that the information required to be disclosed in the Companys Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Companys management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only partial assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.
As of August 31, 2004, the end of the quarter covered by this report, an evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of the Companys management, including the Companys Chief Executive Officer and the Companys Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures as required by SEC Rule 13a 15(b). Based on the foregoing, the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.
Changes in internal control over financial reporting. At the end of the second quarter of fiscal year 2005, the Company combined the Chief Financial Officer and Controller positions. New internal control procedures have been implemented after the quarterly period covered by this report; accordingly, certain internal control duties and responsibilities that we formerly divided between the Chief Financial Officer and Controller have been reallocated among other existing administrative personnel. We made these changes in order to maintain the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1 - Legal Proceedings
On March 5, 2004 DPAC Technologies filed a Complaint against ATS Oregon, Inc. (ATS) in Superior Court for the State of California, Orange County. ATS was the equipment company contracted by DPAC Technologies to build the automated laser weld equipment for the DuraStack technology. The Complaint alleges breach of contract, fraud by failure to disclose and active concealment, negligent misrepresentation giving rise to rescission rights. The Complaint seeks a return of all moneys paid to ATS, actual damages, incidental and consequential damages, and for punitive and exemplary damages. On April 22, 2004, ATS filed an Answer and Cross-Complaint against DPAC. The Cross-Complaint is for breach of contract, account stated, and reasonable value of goods and services. On April 23, 2004, ATS filed a Notice of Removal to remove the action from state to federal court in the Central District of California, Southern Division. The case has been assigned Case No. SACV04-471 AHS (Mcx). The Company believes that it has meritorious defenses to ATS claims and intends to vigorously defend against those claims. This suit is in its initial stages and no estimate of potential loss, if any, is presently determinable.
27
ITEM 2 - Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds
We sold 2,484,467 shares of Common Stock and Warrants to purchase up to 2,514,410 shares Common Stock to 13 institutional investors in a private placement on May 5, 2004. The placement was not registered under the Securities Act of 1933 pursuant to the exemption in Section 4(2) and the safe-harbor provisions of Regulation Ds Rule 506 promulgated under Section 4(2). The Company on July 12, 2004 registered for resale the Common Stock and the underlying common stock related to the Warrants pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 on a Form S-3. The aggregate offering price was $2 million in cash. The Series A warrants expire in five years and are exercisable for approximately 1.24 million additional shares of common stock at $1.24 per share. 968,836 of these Series A Warrants are called Restricted Series A Warrants on account of not becoming exercisable until November 11, 2004, when six months shall have elapsed after May 5, 2004. The Series B warrants expire May 30, 2005, which is 320 days after July 14, 2004 and are exercisable for approximately 1.03 million additional shares of common stock $.97 per share. The placement agent received Series C warrants that will expire in five years and are for approximately 238,000 shares at $1.07 per share. The warrants are callable under certain conditions. The Company has used the proceeds for working capital. Any future proceeds received upon an exercise of outstanding warrants would be used for working capital or other general corporate purposes.
ITEM 3 - Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None
ITEM 4 - Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None
ITEM 5 - Other Information
On June 23, 2004 we filed a registration statement on Form S-3 (Commission File Number 333-116758) to register 4,998,877 shares of Common Stock, some or all of which are to be offered by selling stockholders on a continuous basis from time to time after the registration statement is declared effective. The registration statement, as amended, was declared effective July 14, 2004. Post-effective amendment number one to the registration statement was declared effective on August 7, 2004. The registration statement was filed pursuant to the terms of the private placement on May 5, 2004 as described in Item 2.
ITEM 6 - Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) Exhibits
10.6.2 Silicon Valley Bank Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement
31.1 Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a).
32.1 Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K -
28
We filed a Report of Form 8-K on September 1, 2004, reporting under Items 1.02; 2.01; 2.05; 5; and 9 information concerning completion of the previously announced disposal of our memory stacking operations, the election of a new Chief Financial Officer, and the departure of our former Chief Financial Officer.
We furnished a Report on Form 8-K on July 22, 2004 reporting under Item 5, information concerning our filing an application to begin trading on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market.
We furnished a Report on Form 8-K on July 20, 2004, reporting under Items 4 and 7 that Deloitte & Touche, LLP would not stand for reelection as DPAC Technologies principal independent accountants and our appointment of Moss Adams LLP as our new principal independent accountants.
We furnished a Report on Form 8-K/A on July 12, 2004 to amend the Form 8-K filed on June 16, 2004 in order to add Item 7(b) the Unaudited Pro Forma condensed financial Information of DPAC Technologies Corp.
We filed a Report on Form 8-K on June 30, 2004, reporting under Item 5 information concerning our non-compliance with requirements to continue listing the Common Stock for trading on the Nasdaq Stock Market.
We furnished a Report on Form 8-K on June 29, 2004, furnishing information filing under Items 7 and 12, including the news release related to our earnings for the quarter ended May 31, 2004 and the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet Information (Unaudited) and Condensed Statement of Income (Unaudited).
We furnished a Report on Form 8-K on June 16, 2004, furnishing information under Items 7 and 9, reporting the disposition of DPACs patents and patent applications related to memory stacking.
We filed a Report on Form 8-K on June 2, 2004 reporting under Item 5 the departure of our former Chief Operating Officer.
29
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
DPAC TECHNOLOGIES CORP. |
||
|
|
|
|
(Registrant) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 18, 2004 |
|
|
By: |
|
/s/ CREIGHTON K. EARLY |
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
Creighton K. Early, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 18, 2004 |
|
|
By: |
|
/s/ STEPHEN J. VUKADINOVICH |
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
Stephen J. Vukadinovich, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
30
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exh. No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
10.6.2 |
|
Silicon Valley Bank Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement |
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a). |
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
31