SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
ý QUARTERLY REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the period ended June 30, 2004
OR
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission file number 0-32667
CAP ROCK ENERGY CORPORATION
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
TEXAS |
|
75-2794300 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction
of |
|
(I.R.S Employer |
|
|
|
500 West Wall Street, Suite 400, Midland, Texas |
|
79701 |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
|
|
|
(432) 683-5422 |
||
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code) |
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No ý
As of June 30, 2004, the Registrant had 1,559,615 shares of its $.01 par value common stock outstanding.
CAP ROCK ENERGY CORPORATION
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
2
CAP ROCK ENERGY CORPORATION
Consolidated Statements of Operations
In thousands, except per share amounts
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three Months |
|
Six Months |
|
||||||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||||
Operating revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Electric sales |
|
$ |
22,560 |
|
$ |
18,814 |
|
$ |
42,480 |
|
$ |
40,801 |
|
Other |
|
307 |
|
436 |
|
675 |
|
793 |
|
||||
Total operating revenues |
|
22,867 |
|
19,250 |
|
43,155 |
|
41,594 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Purchased power |
|
9,583 |
|
8,533 |
|
18,486 |
|
19,498 |
|
||||
Operations and maintenance |
|
2,105 |
|
2,446 |
|
4,800 |
|
4,826 |
|
||||
General and administrative |
|
2,932 |
|
1,458 |
|
4,912 |
|
2,971 |
|
||||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
1,907 |
|
1,772 |
|
3,798 |
|
3,589 |
|
||||
Property taxes |
|
772 |
|
337 |
|
1,559 |
|
658 |
|
||||
Other |
|
89 |
|
76 |
|
128 |
|
244 |
|
||||
Total operating expenses |
|
17,388 |
|
14,622 |
|
33,683 |
|
31,786 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Operating income |
|
5,479 |
|
4,628 |
|
9,472 |
|
9,808 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Interest expense, net of capitalized interest |
|
(1,851 |
) |
(1,662 |
) |
(3,705 |
) |
(3,374 |
) |
||||
Interest and other income |
|
122 |
|
265 |
|
232 |
|
531 |
|
||||
Equity earnings in MAP |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
||||
Total other expense |
|
(1,729 |
) |
(1,345 |
) |
(3,473 |
) |
(2,765 |
) |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net income before income taxes |
|
3,750 |
|
3,283 |
|
5,999 |
|
7,043 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Income tax expense |
|
721 |
|
678 |
|
908 |
|
1,377 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net income |
|
$ |
3,029 |
|
$ |
2,605 |
|
$ |
5,091 |
|
$ |
5,666 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net income per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Basic |
|
$ |
1.94 |
|
$ |
2.00 |
|
$ |
3.25 |
|
$ |
4.35 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
1.87 |
|
$ |
1.92 |
|
$ |
3.14 |
|
$ |
4.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Weighted average number of common shares oustanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Basic |
|
1,563,062 |
|
1,301,325 |
|
1,564,498 |
|
1,301,705 |
|
||||
Diluted |
|
1,619,377 |
|
1,356,623 |
|
1,621,213 |
|
1,357,003 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
3
CAP ROCK ENERGY CORPORATION
(In thousands)
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash |
|
$ |
21,965 |
|
$ |
12,170 |
|
Restricted cash investment |
|
14,169 |
|
14,169 |
|
||
Accounts receivable: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Electric sales, net |
|
9,852 |
|
8,500 |
|
||
Other |
|
329 |
|
371 |
|
||
Note receivable |
|
1,250 |
|
1,250 |
|
||
Other current assets |
|
1,615 |
|
1,587 |
|
||
Total current assets |
|
49,180 |
|
38,047 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Investments and notes receivable |
|
10,970 |
|
10,045 |
|
||
Utility plant, net |
|
151,191 |
|
152,162 |
|
||
Nonutility property, net |
|
1,242 |
|
1,545 |
|
||
Regulatory and other assets |
|
1,702 |
|
1,190 |
|
||
Total Assets |
|
$ |
214,285 |
|
$ |
202,989 |
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
$ |
4,531 |
|
$ |
4,654 |
|
Short-term note payable |
|
14,169 |
|
14,169 |
|
||
Accounts payable: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Purchased power |
|
6,146 |
|
2,798 |
|
||
Other |
|
2,470 |
|
2,679 |
|
||
Purchased power subject to refund |
|
21 |
|
203 |
|
||
Accrued, other and regulatory liabilities |
|
5,325 |
|
3,902 |
|
||
Current income tax payable |
|
1,470 |
|
562 |
|
||
Total current liabilities |
|
34,132 |
|
28,967 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Long-term debt, net of current portion: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Mortgage notes |
|
141,529 |
|
143,188 |
|
||
Note payable and other capital leases |
|
187 |
|
184 |
|
||
Total long-term debt |
|
141,716 |
|
143,372 |
|
||
Deferred credits |
|
4,877 |
|
3,677 |
|
||
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Preferred stock, par value $1 per share, 50,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued or outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Common stock, par value $.01 per share, 50,000,000 shares authorized, 1,644,000 shares issued and 1,559,615 outstanding at June 30, 2004; 1,650,395 shares issued and 1,567,725 outstanding at December 31, 2003 |
|
16 |
|
17 |
|
||
Paid in capital |
|
11,469 |
|
11,641 |
|
||
Retained earnings |
|
25,065 |
|
19,974 |
|
||
Less Deferred compensation |
|
(2,096 |
) |
(3,826 |
) |
||
Less Treasury stock of 84,385 and 82,670 shares, respectively at June 30, 2004, and December 31, 2003 |
|
(894 |
) |
(833 |
) |
||
Total stockholders equity |
|
33,560 |
|
26,973 |
|
||
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
$ |
214,285 |
|
$ |
202,989 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
4
CAP ROCK ENERGY CORPORATION
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Six Months Ended June 30, 2004 and 2003
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash Flows From Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net income |
|
$ |
5,091 |
|
$ |
5,666 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
3,798 |
|
6,263 |
|
||
Noncash employee compensation |
|
1,558 |
|
559 |
|
||
Equity earnings in Map |
|
|
|
(78 |
) |
||
Changes in: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Other assets/deferred credits |
|
193 |
|
(1,597 |
) |
||
Accounts receivable |
|
(1,310 |
) |
(3,304 |
) |
||
Purchased power cost subject to refund/recovery |
|
(182 |
) |
1,534 |
|
||
Other current assets |
|
(28 |
) |
(777 |
) |
||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
5,470 |
|
420 |
|
||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
14,590 |
|
8,686 |
|
||
Cash Flows From Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Utility plant additions, net |
|
(2,315 |
) |
(2,705 |
) |
||
Additions/deletions to nonutility investments |
|
(639 |
) |
134 |
|
||
Collection of notes receivable |
|
|
|
515 |
|
||
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
(2,954 |
) |
(2,056 |
) |
||
Cash Flows From Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Payments on mortgage notes |
|
(1,828 |
) |
(1,758 |
) |
||
Payments on other long-term debt and capital leases |
|
(64 |
) |
(3,227 |
) |
||
Proceeds from capital lease |
|
113 |
|
|
|
||
Repurchase/acquisition of common stock |
|
(62 |
) |
(821 |
) |
||
Retirement of former member equity |
|
|
|
(246 |
) |
||
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
(1,841 |
) |
(6,052 |
) |
||
Increase (Decrease) In Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
9,795 |
|
578 |
|
||
Cash and Cash Equivalents: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Beginning of period |
|
12,170 |
|
9,899 |
|
||
End of period |
|
$ |
21,965 |
|
$ |
10,477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Supplemental Cash Flow Information: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash paid during the period for interest |
|
$ |
3,803 |
|
$ |
3,872 |
|
Cash paid during the period for income taxes |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
900 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
5
CAP ROCK ENERGY CORPORATION
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
1. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Registrant, Cap Rock Energy Corporation (the Company) and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. In the opinion of management of Cap Rock Energy Corporation, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments, which include only normal recurring adjustments, necessary for the fair presentation of the Companys financial position as of June 30, 2004 and 2003, and its consolidated results of operations and cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2004, and 2003. The consolidated results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire year. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Companys annual report on Form 10-K and the quarterly reports on Form 10-Q.
2. Basic and Diluted Weighted Average Number of Shares Outstanding
The table below shows the reconciliation between the basic and diluted weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003:
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
1,563,062 |
|
1,301,325 |
|
1,564,898 |
|
1,301,705 |
|
Shares that have been deferred under the Stock for Compensation Plan |
|
56,315 |
|
55,298 |
|
56,315 |
|
55,298 |
|
Diluted |
|
1,619,377 |
|
1,356,623 |
|
1,621,213 |
|
1,357,003 |
|
The majority of the net increase in the number of basic shares from the 2003 periods to the 2004 periods is due to the awarding of stock to officers and directors of 302,500 shares, and the repurchase of 82,140 shares through the tender offer.
3. Regulatory Asset and Liability
As of June 30, 2004, regulatory liabilities were composed of purchased power subject to refund of $21,000, and $752,000 excess recovery of costs incurred in connection with the Companys response to Opposing Intervenors actions, included in the balance sheet under Accrued, other and regulatory liabilities.
The regulatory asset was composed of costs paid to outside parties that were incurred in connection with the rate case of $1,176,000. See Note 6. The Company believes it will be allowed to recover its rate costs and offset them against the excess recovery noted above. If allowed, the effect would be revenue neutral. As of June 30, 2003, the regulatory asset was purchased power subject to recovery of $1,967,000.
4. Income Taxes
Unlike the predecessor company, Cap Rock Energy Corporation is a taxable entity. One of its wholly-owned subsidiaries, NewCorp Resources Electric Cooperative, Inc. (NewCorp), is a tax-exempt cooperative under IRS Code Section 501(c)(12), and files a separate tax return. Income tax expense of $721,000 and $908,000 has been recorded for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, based upon the Companys estimate of its ability to utilize its net operating loss carryforwards in future periods, as well as tax planning strategies available to realize the benefit of those tax loss carry-forwards. If the Company should elect not to implement those strategies, approximately $2.1 million of income tax expense would need to be provided, in order to restore the deferred income taxes payable previously offset by the net operating losses. However, the
6
Company fully intends to implement its strategy and realize the tax benefits.
As described in Notes 23 and 24 to the consolidated financial statements for December 31, 2003, included in the Companys Form 10-K, the Company was notified by the IRS that it intended to examine the federal income tax return of its Predecessor for the year 2001. The IRS has commenced its audit process. The Company believes that its Predecessor and affiliates have adequately provided for its tax liabilities and does not anticipate any material impact to its earnings, cash flows or liquidity as a result of this review.
5. New Accounting Standards
On April 22, 2003, the FASB announced its decision to require all companies to expense the fair value of employee stock options. Companies will be required to measure the cost according to the fair value of the options. Although the new guidelines and ultimate measurement valuation methodology have not yet been released, it is expected that they will be finalized soon and will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2004. As currently written, the proposed rules do not affect current stock compensation accounting of the Company. However, future issuances would be subject to the new rules and could be materially different from prior accounting.
In December 2003, the FASB issued Statement No. 132 (Revised 2003), Employers Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits (SFAS No. 132R), which retains the disclosure requirements in SFAS No. 132 and contains additional requirements. These additional requirements include disclosures about a plan sponsors investment strategies, detailed information of plan assets, expected future cash flow requirements, and interim disclosures related to periodic benefit cost.
In March 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board staff issued FASB Staff Position 106-b, Accounting and Disclosure Requirements Related to the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (the Act). The Act was signed into law in December 2003. Any measures of the accumulated projected benefit obligation or net periodic postretirement benefit cost in the financial statements or accompanying notes do not reflect the effects of the Act on the Companys postretirement healthcare plan. The Company chose the deferral election to suspend application of SFAS 106s measurement requirements of SFAS No. 132R. FASB Staff Position 106-2 was issued in May 2004, which the Company will be implementing on a prospective basis in the quarter ended September 30, 2004. The Company does not expect the impact to be material to its consolidated financial statements.
6. Contingencies
The Company is currently involved in a proceeding at the Public Utility Commission of Texas (PUCT) to determine the reasonableness of its rates. In that proceeding, the Company has requested a $6,333,000 overall annual after tax increase. Numerous parties have intervened and are requesting that the Companys rates be decreased and that the Company be required to refund all monies it previously collected pursuant to a regulatory surcharge authorized by the Board of Directors during 2003, which amounts to $2.4 million. The regulatory surcharge was intended to recover intervention costs associated with the successful transfer of the CCN to Cap Rock Energy from its predecessor. The proceeding is currently in the discovery phase. The Company believes its rates are reasonable and that the requested rate increase is appropriate based upon its cost of service and reasonable return on its invested assets.
The Company cannot determine what action the PUCT will take with respect to its current rates or its requested rate increase. The PUCT was required to rule on the rate request within a specified number of days, unless the Company consented to an extension. In order to allow all parties more time to prepare for the hearing on this matter, the Company consented to an extension of the hearing from July 6, 2004, to October 5, 2004. The Company expects a final ruling in the first quarter of 2005.
7
As more fully described in Note 23 to the consolidated financial statements included in the Companys Form 10-K for December 31, 2003, an affiliate of the Company, NewCorp, had requested that the PUCT correct the name on its CCN to reflect NewCorp as the holder of the CCN, instead of its predecessor. The PUCT approved the transfer of NewCorps CCN on June 15, 2004.
Discovery is ongoing in the litigation involving the Company and Lamar Electric Cooperative Association, Inc. (Lamar) which arose out of Lamars termination of the Combination Agreement between Lamar and the Company in October 2002 and the Management Services Agreement in November 2002. Lamar filed suit against the Company in the 62nd District Court in Lamar County, Texas, seeking a declaratory judgment that it had a right to terminate both agreements without regard to payment of any kind to the Company. The Company believes that Lamars stated reason for termination of the Combination Agreement does not fall within the specific allowable exceptions set forth in the agreement, and therefore the Company is seeking reimbursement of all costs and expenses incurred with regard to the attempted combination which amount to at least $1.4, million as well as a cancellation fee of $300,000 for liquidated damages as set out in the terms of the Management Service Agreement. A trial date has been set for February 7, 2005.
7. Postretirement Benefits
The Company provides continued major medical and life insurance coverage to retired employees and their dependents. The components of net periodic benefit cost for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||
Service cost |
|
$ |
107 |
|
$ |
103 |
|
Interest cost |
|
259 |
|
253 |
|
||
Amortization of experience loss |
|
163 |
|
164 |
|
||
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
529 |
|
$ |
520 |
|
In its financial statements as of December 31, 2003, the Company disclosed that it expected to contribute $484,000 to its postretirement healthcare plan for 2004. As of June 2004, $156,000 of contributions have been made. The Company anticipates that it will make an additional contribution of $328,000 in 2004.
8. Subsequent Events
At June 30, 2004, the Company had a note receivable from MAP Resources, Inc. (MAP) for $1,250,000 with a maturity date of October 2004. In July 2004, MAP repaid the entire principal balance plus interest, and the Company released the collateral.
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Caution Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contains forward-looking statements regarding matters that could have an impact on our business, financial condition and future operations. These statements, based on our expectation and estimates, are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements. These risks, uncertainties and other factors include, but are not limited to:
Weather conditions;
8
Increased competition in the electric utility industry;
Federal and state regulatory actions, and associated legal and administrative proceedings, especially as they relate to the oversight authority of the Public Utility Commission of Texas, and the pending rate proceeding;
Changes in and compliance with environmental laws and policies;
Changes in rate structure and ability to earn a fair return on our rate base and recover the costs of operations;
Demands for electric power and the associated costs, including changes in the costs of power plant fuels such as natural gas and coal;
Changes in the Companys cash position and availability of capital resources;
Changes in federal and state tax laws;
The impact of changes in interest rates; and
Unexpected changes in operating expenses and capital expenditures.
Our actual results may vary materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements as a result of these and other factors. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which such statement is made, and we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which the statement is made even if new information becomes available or other events occur in the future.
Overview
Cap Rock Energy Corporation is an electric distribution company operating in various non-contiguous areas in the State of Texas. The Company purchases power from wholesale suppliers and distributes that power to its retail customers over transmission and distribution lines. Effective September 1, 2003, Cap Rock Energy Corporation became subject to the oversight authority of the PUCT, and the rates and fees charged to customers by the Company are now subject to PUCT approval. NewCorp Resources Electric Cooperative, Inc. (NewCorp), a transmission affiliate of Cap Rock Energy Corporation, is subject to the oversight authority of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC).
Results of Operations
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||||
Operating Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Electric |
|
$ |
22,560 |
|
$ |
18,814 |
|
$ |
42,480 |
|
$ |
40,801 |
|
Other |
|
307 |
|
436 |
|
675 |
|
793 |
|
||||
Total operating revenues |
|
$ |
22,867 |
|
$ |
19,250 |
|
$ |
43,155 |
|
$ |
41,594 |
|
The consumption and demand for electricity within the Companys service areas is greatly impacted by weather conditions and temperatures. The hot temperatures during the summer months, or the third quarter, require residential customers to use more electricity in cooling their homes. Rural customers who irrigate crops use more electricity in the summer months for the irrigation process, and if the spring season didnt bring much rain, these customers may irrigate sooner and longer. Portions of the Companys service areas have been experiencing a severe long-term drought. The National Weather Service Climate Prediction shows only minimal relief for 2004.
Electric revenues increased by $3,746,000 and $1,679,000 respectively, for the three and six month periods for 2004 as compared to 2003. This change is the result of the following major factors:
Increase in electric sales of approximately $1,180,000 as a result of a rise in consumer consumption for the six month comparative periods;
Increase in the power cost recovery and unbilled revenue of $4,439,000 and $4,354,000, respectively, for the three and six month comparative periods;
9
A regulatory surcharge of $585,000 and $474,000 for the three and six month comparative periods, which related to recovery of intervention costs;
Recognition of deferred revenue in the three and six month periods of 2003 of $546,000 and $1,092,000 caused a comparative decrease for 2004. The deferred revenue recognition for the 2003 periods related to purchased power expensed in prior years, but was recovered from customers over the 24 month period from January 2002 to December 2003. This decrease offsets the increases noted above.
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||||
Operating Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Purchased power |
|
$ |
9,583 |
|
$ |
8,533 |
|
$ |
18,486 |
|
$ |
19,498 |
|
Operations and maintenance |
|
2,105 |
|
2,446 |
|
4,800 |
|
4,826 |
|
||||
General and administrative |
|
2,932 |
|
1,458 |
|
4,912 |
|
2,971 |
|
||||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
1,907 |
|
1,772 |
|
3,798 |
|
3,589 |
|
||||
Property taxes |
|
772 |
|
337 |
|
1,559 |
|
658 |
|
||||
Other |
|
89 |
|
76 |
|
128 |
|
244 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Total operating expenses |
|
$ |
17,388 |
|
$ |
14,622 |
|
$ |
33,683 |
|
$ |
31,786 |
|
Purchased power expense normally moves in relation to electric demand and consumption. Contract terms with wholesale power suppliers provide for pricing based upon the price of fuel, demand and usage. All costs of power are passed through to the Companys retail customers. Purchased power increased $1,050,000 for the comparative three month periods, but decreased $1,012,000 for the comparative six month periods. The two major changes are as follows:
Power costs increased for the three and six month comparative periods. The total increase attributable to power costs, as well as consumer consumption is $2,619,000 and $2,376,000 for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003;
The conclusion of the rate making treatment of the capital lease payments associated with the transmission system in late 2003 caused a decrease in the comparative three and six month periods of $1,686,000 and $3,459,000. Rate making treatment required the Company to classify the amortization of property and equipment under the capital lease, as well as the associated interest expense, as purchased power. Because the capital lease was extinguished in September 2003, this treatment is no longer applicable. This decrease offsets the increase noted above.
Factors affecting operations and maintenance expenses are certain weather conditions such as high winds, ice storms and lightning, which cause damage to electric lines and interrupt service. Operations and maintenance expense decreased $341,000 for the comparative three month periods, and $26,000 for the comparative six month periods because these activities have remained relatively static.
General and administrative expenses increased by $1,474,000 and $1,941,000 for the comparative three and six month periods between 2004 and 2003, primarily because of the expensing of noncash stock awards to officers and directors.
The Company anticipates property tax expense for 2004 will materially increase due to current appraisal methodologies used in the ad valorem taxation of investor owned utilities in Texas. Therefore the Company has increased its accrual for property tax expense for 2004 as compared to 2003.
10
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||||
Other Income (Expenses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Interest expense, net of capitalized interest |
|
$ |
(1,851 |
) |
$ |
(1,662 |
) |
$ |
(3,705 |
) |
$ |
(3,374 |
) |
Interest and other income |
|
122 |
|
265 |
|
232 |
|
531 |
|
||||
Equity earnings in MAP |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Total other income (expense) |
|
$ |
(1,729 |
) |
$ |
(1,345 |
) |
$ |
(3,473 |
) |
$ |
(2,765 |
) |
Interest expense between the periods has increased $189,000 and $331,000, respectively, which is the net effect of three components:
Interest on the new Beal Bank note in the 2004 periods of $385,000 and $770,000, respectively;
Extinguishment of the note payable to a bank in September 2003, causing a decrease in the 2004 periods of $162,000 and $322,000, respectively;
Slight reduction in the 2004 period in interest rates on a portion of the mortgage debt, coupled with a reduction in the outstanding balance because of scheduled payments made.
The majority of the $143,000 and $299,000 reduction in interest and other income between the three and six month comparative periods is because of the extinguishment of the note receivable from United Fuel in September 2003.
Because the investment in MAP Resources was sold in the fourth quarter of 2003, there are no equity earnings to be recorded in the 2004 periods.
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||||
Income Tax Expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Income tax expense |
|
$ |
721 |
|
$ |
678 |
|
$ |
908 |
|
$ |
1,377 |
|
Income tax expense has increased or decreased because of the change in net taxable income between the periods. NewCorps net income is nontaxable, therefore the effective tax rate of 19% is less than the statutory tax rate.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of June 30, 2004, the Company had:
Cash and cash equivalents of $21,965,000;
Current restricted cash investment of $14,169,000;
Working capital of $15,048,000;
Long-term indebtedness of $141,716,000, net of current portion.
The Company requires capital to fund utility plant additions, working capital and other utility expenditures which are recovered in subsequent and future periods through rates. Capital necessary to meet these cash requirements is now derived primarily from normal operations. As of June 30, 2004, the Company had accumulated a cash balance sufficient to meet its current and anticipated obligations, exclusive of the restricted cash investment which offsets the short term note payable.
Through 2001, one of the Companys primary sources of capital and liquidity had been borrowings from CFC, the Companys primary lender. These borrowings are collateralized by substantially all of the Companys utility distribution assets. The existing long-term debt consists of a series of loans from CFC that impose various covenants. The Company is in compliance with all CFC loan covenants.
11
In December 2002, the Company elected to convert the interest rates on the majority of the mortgage notes from variable to fixed pursuant to the terms of the CFC loan agreements. These lock-ins of interest rates were done for one, two and three year periods. Substantially all of the CFC fixed rate notes are subject to interest rate repricing at the end of various periods.
Interest Rate |
|
Repricing January |
|
Amount (in thousands) |
|
|||
Fixed |
|
3.05 |
% |
2005 |
|
$ |
6,619 |
|
Fixed |
|
4.20 |
% |
2005 |
|
68,459 |
|
|
Fixed |
|
4.70 |
% |
2006 |
|
33,579 |
|
|
Fixed |
|
4.50 |
% |
2007 |
|
6,021 |
|
|
Fixed |
|
4.30 |
% |
|
|
28,000 |
|
|
Fixed |
|
7.00 |
% |
|
|
2 |
|
|
Variable |
|
2.95 |
% |
|
|
3,212 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mortgage debt |
|
|
|
$ |
145,892 |
|
In the accompanying consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2004, and December 31, 2003, the initial advance from Beal Bank S.S.B (Beal Bank) of $14,169,000 is shown as short-term note payable in current liabilities because it is not certain that the Company will draw on the additional advance from Beal Bank. The Company still has other available options, which it may pursue, such as refinancing the debt with another lender or renegotiating the debt with Beal on terms which would be more favorable to the Company. Whether the Company draws on the additional advance with Beal Bank or another option is chosen, the restricted cash investment will be released at the same time. If the Company draws on the additional advance, the restricted cash investment of $14,169,000 would be released and available for use in operations, as well as new capital of $17,331,000. If the Company pursues one of the other options, the restricted cash investment would be used to satisfy the initial advance of $14,169,000.
Cap Rock Energy is currently involved in a proceeding at the Public Utility Commission of Texas (PUCT) to determine the reasonableness of its rates. In that proceeding, the Company has requested a $6,333,000 overall annual after tax increase. Numerous parties have intervened and are requesting that Cap Rock Energys rates be decreased and that it be required to refund all monies it previously collected pursuant to a regulatory surcharge authorized by the Board of Directors during 2003, which amounts to $2.4 million. The regulatory surcharge was intended to recover intervention costs associated with the successful transfer of the CCN to Cap Rock Energy from its predecessor. The proceeding is currently in the discovery phase. The Company believes Cap Rock Energys rates are reasonable and that the requested rate increase is appropriate based upon its cost of service and reasonable return on its invested assets. The requested rate increase, along with the refinancing of the transmission system, would allow Cap Rock to pay down some of its mortgage debt. The Company intends to bring its debt to equity ratio closer to 60/40, which management believes is more in line with comparable electric utilities. There is no assurance as to when, or if, Cap Rock Energys or the Companys debt to equity ratio will change.
Cap Rock Energy cannot determine what action the PUCT will take with respect to its current rates or its requested rate increase. The realization of the regulatory asset and the timing of such realization, as well as the associated excess recovery, will also be determined by the PUCT. The PUCT was required to rule within a specified number of days, unless the Company consented to an extension. In order to allow all parties more time to prepare for the hearing on this matter, the Company consented to an extension of the hearing from July 6, 2004, to October 5, 2004. The Company expects a final ruling in the first quarter of 2005.
When the regulatory process has been completed and the PUCT issues a final order concerning retail rates, the Company will assess Cap Rocks anticipated position relative to a debt/equity ratio. The Company may consider having a secondary common stock offering. At that time, the Company would also consider implementing a dividend policy. There is no assurance as to whether, or if, Cap Rock Energys or the Companys debt to equity ratio will change, or if a dividend policy will be implemented.
12
The Company has tax planning strategies available to realize the benefit of tax loss carryforwards. If the Company should elect not to implement those strategies, approximately $1.7 million of income tax expense would need to be provided, in order to restore the deferred income taxes payable previously offset by the net operating losses. However, the Company fully intends to implement its strategy and realize the tax benefits.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Market risk represents the risk of changes in the value of a financial instrument caused by fluctuations in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, prices of commodities and equity price risks.
Commodity Price Risk
All purchases of electricity are pursuant to long-term wholesale electric power contracts based on a fixed price for kWh usage, transportation and auxiliary services, with a variable charge for fuel cost, which is generally natural gas. This variable cost is affected by unpredictable factors, including weather and worldwide events, which in turn impact supply and demand. The Companys exposure to purchased power price risk is substantially mitigated because all actual costs of power are able to be recovered from billings to customers.
Credit Risk
The Companys concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash, trade accounts receivable, sales concentrations with certain customers, a guarantee of third party debt and notes receivable from third parties.
Credit risk relating to deposits at financial institutions is considered minimal because of the number of different financial institutions utilized. In the past, the Company has utilized repurchase agreements, and may consider using that vehicle again in the future to maximize return and minimize credit risk.
The Beal Bank loan documents related to the restricted cash investment of $14,169,000 provide that the collateral may only be invested in US government securities, bank certificates of deposit, money market funds or other approved investments with varying terms of one year or less. Whether the Company draws on the additional advance with Beal Bank, or another option is chosen, this restricted cash investment will be released at the same time. If the Beal Bank arrangement is terminated, the restricted cash investment would be used to satisfy the initial advance of $14,169,000.
The Company conducts credit evaluations of new customers and assesses the need for a deposit by that customer. The deposit amount is normally set as 1/6 of an annual customer billing, with such amounts being refunded or credited to the customer after one year if the customer has paid timely at least 10 of the previous 12 billings. No customer accounted for 10% or more of the operating revenues of the Company.
The Company is a secondary guarantor on a note to a bank for $3,500,000, and recorded a guarantee obligation of $35,000 based upon the Companys calculation of the fair value of the obligation. When the note is repaid, the bank will release the guarantee and the Company will be able to eliminate the recorded obligation.
In its continued effort to focus on its core business, the Company sold its investment in MAP effective October 2003, in exchange for a note receivable of $1,250,000 due October 2004. In July 2004, MAP repaid the entire principal balance plus interest, and the Company released the collateralized original stock. The Company also sold its investments in real estate partnerships in February 2004, in exchange for a note receivable of $286,000 due in 2009. There was no gain or loss on the sale. The note is collateralized by the partnership interests.
In March 2004, the Company signed an agreement with a shareholder of United Fuel and Energy Corporation
13
(United Fuel) to sell its shares of stock in that company for a sales price of $1,300,000 in exchange for a note receivable. The terms of the agreement provide: (a) interest on the note receivable at 6% per annum, (b) payment of $500,000 on the payment date plus accrued interest, (c) payment of the remaining principal balance in three equal annual installments plus accrued interest beginning one year after the payment date. The payment date is defined as the sooner of 24 months from the date of the agreement or 60 days after United Fuel has completed certain capitalization arrangements.
Interest Rate Risk
We are subject to market risk associated with interest rates on our CFC long-term indebtedness. The Companys mortgage debt with CFC allows for a change from variable rate to fixed rate with no additional fees. In December 2002, the Company took advantage of favorable interest rates and converted its variable rate loans with CFC to fixed rate loans with staggered periods. As discussed above in Liquidity and Capital Resources, the notes are subject to repricing at the end of various periods. Mortgage notes of $68,459,000 with current interest rates of 4.20% are due to be repriced in January 2005, mortgage notes of $6,021,000 with current interest rates of 4.50% are due to be repriced in January 2007, mortgage notes of $33,579,000 with current interest rates of 4.70% are due to be repriced in January 2006, $3,212,000 of mortgage notes were repriced in January 2004 with a variable interest rate at June 30, 2004, of 3.00% and $6,619,000 of mortgage notes were repriced in January 2004 with an interest rate of 4.3% for the term of the note. A 1% change in interest rates would cause a change of $1,601,000 in interest expense. The Company attempts to take advantage of low interest rate environments, as well as repricing interest rates over staggered periods.
Changes in market interest rates affect the interest earnings on the restricted cash investment which, at June 30, 2004, had a balance of $14,169,000. The terms of the Beal Bank loan documents provide that the collateral may only be invested in U S Government securities, bank certificates of deposit, money market funds or other approved investments, with varying terms of one year or less. The weighted average interest rate for the investments for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, was less than one percent.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
At the date of this report, an evaluation was carried out, under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Based upon that evaluation, the chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective, subject to the limitations below, to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms.
There have been no significant changes in the Companys internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
The Company, including its CEO and CFO, does not expect that the Companys disclosure and internal controls and procedures will prevent or detect all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived or operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of a control system are met.
14
See Note 6, Contingencies, to the consolidated financial statements.
There is no other litigation pending or threatened against the Company, other than certain legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business, none of which are expected to have a material impact on the Companys financial condition, operating results or liquidity.
Item 2. Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds
None
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None
None
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
|
a. |
Exhibits: |
||
|
|
10.85 |
Employment Contract between the Company and William L. West dated January 1, 2004. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chief Executive Officer). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chief Financial Officer). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chief Executive Officer). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chief Financial Officer). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
b. |
Reports on Form 8-K: |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 9, 2004, the Company issued a press release announcing the date of its annual meeting of shareholders and its record date for voting at the annual meeting. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 16, the Company issued a press release announcing David W. Pruitts 10b5-1Trading Plan dated April 13, 2004. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 17, 2004, Cap Rock Energy reports earnings for quarter ended March 31, 2004. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 17, 2004, Public Utility Commission of Texas notified the Company of approval of name correction on CCN for its affiliate. |
||
15
|
|
July 1, 2004, the Company issued a press release announcing the new procedural schedule in the rate case with the Public Utility Commission of Texas. |
|
|
|
|
|
July 7, 2004, David Pruitts cancellation of 10b-5-1 Trading Plan, and other Officers Forfeit Shares for Tax Obligations. |
16
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
CAP ROCK ENERGY CORPORATION |
|
|
|
|
August 19, 2004 |
|
|
/s/ Lee D. Atkins |
|
Lee D. Atkins |
|
Senior Vice President, |
17
Exhibit Number |
|
Description of Document |
|
|
|
10.85 |
|
Employment Contract between the Company and William L. West dated January 1, 2004.* |
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chief Executive Officer). * |
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chief Financial Officer). * |
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chief Executive Officer). * |
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chief Financial Officer). * |
* filed herewith
18