UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
ý |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
|
|
|
For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2004 |
|
|
|
or |
||
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
|
|
|
For the Transition Period From to |
Commission File Number: 000-25717
PETROHAWK ENERGY CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware |
|
86-0876964 |
(State of Incorporation) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
1100 Louisiana, Suite 4400, Houston, TX |
|
77002 |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
(832) 204-2700
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No ý
As of August 1, 2004, the Registrant had 13,791,757 shares of Common Stock, $.001 par value, outstanding.
INDEX
2
PETROHAWK ENERGY CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(unaudited)
|
|
JUNE 30, |
|
DECEMBER 31, |
|
||
CURRENT ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash |
|
$ |
45,789,000 |
|
$ |
2,109,681 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Oil and gas sales |
|
3,356,191 |
|
1,898,746 |
|
||
Other |
|
312,665 |
|
113,529 |
|
||
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
937,893 |
|
564,980 |
|
||
Total current assets |
|
50,395,749 |
|
4,686,936 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
OIL AND GAS PROPERTIES, at cost (full cost method) |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Evaluated properties |
|
82,235,358 |
|
78,717,380 |
|
||
Unevaluated properties |
|
1,213,034 |
|
1,294,212 |
|
||
Less accumulated amortization of full cost pool |
|
(41,908,317 |
) |
(39,740,116 |
) |
||
Net oil and gas properties |
|
41,540,075 |
|
40,271,476 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
OTHER OPERATING PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, at cost |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Gas gathering system and equipment |
|
1,502,692 |
|
1,496,404 |
|
||
Support equipment |
|
197,379 |
|
197,379 |
|
||
Other |
|
350,518 |
|
276,498 |
|
||
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
(826,469 |
) |
(813,450 |
) |
||
Net other operating property and equipment |
|
1,224,120 |
|
1,156,831 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
DEBT ISSUE COSTS, net of amortization |
|
1,282,317 |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
$ |
94,442,261 |
|
$ |
46,115,243 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Accounts payable, trade |
|
$ |
2,578,491 |
|
$ |
1,646,559 |
|
Dividends payable |
|
110,375 |
|
112,707 |
|
||
Asset retirement obligation current portion |
|
171,860 |
|
171,860 |
|
||
Income taxes payable |
|
31,251 |
|
|
|
||
Other accrued liabilities |
|
423,974 |
|
566,990 |
|
||
Total current liabilities |
|
3,315,951 |
|
2,498,116 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
LONG-TERM DEBT |
|
|
|
13,284,652 |
|
||
SUBORDINATED CONVERTIBLE NOTE PAYABLE |
|
35,000,000 |
|
|
|
||
ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS, less current portion |
|
1,106,386 |
|
1,062,860 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Preferred stock, $.001 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized; 604,271issued and outstanding at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003. Liquidation value at June 30, 2004 of $5,700,872. |
|
604 |
|
604 |
|
||
Common stock, $.001 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized; 13,800,139 and 6,223,036 shares issued at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively; 13,791,757 and 6,214,654 shares outstanding at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively. |
|
13,800 |
|
6,223 |
|
||
Additional paid-in capital |
|
78,276,174 |
|
51,930,449 |
|
||
Treasury stock, at cost; 8,382 shares at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003. |
|
(36,428 |
) |
(36,428 |
) |
||
Accumulated deficit |
|
(23,234,226 |
) |
(22,631,233 |
) |
||
Total stockholders equity |
|
55,019,924 |
|
29,269,615 |
|
||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
$ |
94,442,261 |
|
$ |
46,115,243 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements
3
PETROHAWK ENERGY CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(unaudited)
|
|
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED |
|
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED |
|
||||||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||||
REVENUES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Oil and gas |
|
$ |
4,892,646 |
|
$ |
2,960,250 |
|
$ |
8,846,853 |
|
$ |
5,954,782 |
|
Field services |
|
95,171 |
|
82,445 |
|
193,358 |
|
189,148 |
|
||||
Total revenue |
|
4,987,817 |
|
3,042,695 |
|
9,040,211 |
|
6,143,930 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
COSTS AND EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Production: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Lease operations |
|
860,584 |
|
555,398 |
|
1,577,481 |
|
1,134,120 |
|
||||
Production, severance and ad valorem taxes |
|
263,084 |
|
205,220 |
|
489,657 |
|
448,476 |
|
||||
Field services |
|
42,972 |
|
41,431 |
|
88,273 |
|
93,268 |
|
||||
General and administrative |
|
1,621,024 |
|
476,193 |
|
2,420,078 |
|
1,249,115 |
|
||||
Stock-based compensation |
|
2,003,464 |
|
163,250 |
|
2,027,216 |
|
165,979 |
|
||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
1,189,227 |
|
1,279,970 |
|
2,260,366 |
|
2,615,038 |
|
||||
Accretion of asset retirement obligations |
|
23,026 |
|
13,703 |
|
46,052 |
|
27,406 |
|
||||
Total costs and expenses |
|
6,003,381 |
|
2,735,165 |
|
8,909,123 |
|
5,733,402 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
INCOME (LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS |
|
(1,015,564 |
) |
307,530 |
|
131,088 |
|
410,528 |
|
||||
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Interest expense |
|
(381,312 |
) |
(122,043 |
) |
(493,939 |
) |
(244,335 |
) |
||||
Interest income and other |
|
17,475 |
|
1,483 |
|
18,900 |
|
2,356 |
|
||||
Total other income (expense) |
|
(363,837 |
) |
(120,560 |
) |
(475,039 |
) |
(241,979 |
) |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAX PROVISION |
|
(1,379,401 |
) |
186,970 |
|
(343,951 |
) |
168,549 |
|
||||
INCOME TAX PROVISION |
|
13,960 |
|
|
|
37,185 |
|
|
|
||||
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF A CHANGE IN ACCOUNTNG PRINCIPLE |
|
(1,393,361 |
) |
186,970 |
|
(381,136 |
) |
168,549 |
|
||||
CUMULATIVE EFFECT ON PRIOR YEARS FROM ADOPTION OF FASB STATEMENT NO. 143, ACCOUNTING FOR ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATION, NET OF TAX |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,640 |
|
||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
|
(1,393,361 |
) |
186,970 |
|
(381,136 |
) |
170,189 |
|
||||
PREFERRED DIVIDENDS |
|
(110,375 |
) |
(111,482 |
) |
(221,857 |
) |
(221,738 |
) |
||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS |
|
$ |
(1,503,736 |
) |
$ |
75,488 |
|
$ |
(602,993 |
) |
$ |
(51,549 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
BASIC NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE |
|
$ |
(0.16 |
) |
$ |
0.01 |
|
$ |
(0.08 |
) |
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
DILUTED NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE |
|
$ |
(0.16 |
) |
$ |
0.01 |
|
$ |
(0.08 |
) |
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
WEIGTHED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Basic |
|
9,211,657 |
|
6,214,661 |
|
7,713,155 |
|
6,216,896 |
|
||||
Fully Diluted |
|
9,211,657 |
|
6,238,420 |
|
7,713,155 |
|
6,216,896 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
|
$ |
(1,393,361 |
) |
$ |
186,970 |
|
$ |
(381,136 |
) |
$ |
170,189 |
|
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Realized loss on qualifying cash flow hedges |
|
|
|
205,046 |
|
|
|
1,236,055 |
|
||||
Unrealized loss on qualifying cash flow hedges |
|
|
|
(88,973 |
) |
|
|
(629,255 |
) |
||||
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) |
|
$ |
(1,393,361 |
) |
$ |
303,043 |
|
$ |
(381,136 |
) |
$ |
776,989 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements
4
PETROHAWK ENERGY CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited)
|
|
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED |
|
||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net income (loss) before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |
|
$ |
(381,136 |
) |
$ |
168,549 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
2,260,366 |
|
2,615,038 |
|
||
Amortization of debt issue costs |
|
21,648 |
|
|
|
||
Accretion of asset retirement obligations |
|
46,052 |
|
27,406 |
|
||
Stock-based compensation |
|
2,027,216 |
|
165,979 |
|
||
Common stock issued in lieu of directors fees |
|
8,883 |
|
|
|
||
Change in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Accounts receivable |
|
(1,656,581 |
) |
(21,203 |
) |
||
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
(372,913 |
) |
(99,035 |
) |
||
Accounts payable, trade |
|
931,932 |
|
(1,084,326 |
) |
||
Income taxes payable |
|
31,251 |
|
|
|
||
Other accrued liabilities |
|
(143,016 |
) |
29,114 |
|
||
Asset retirement obligations incurred |
|
(2,526 |
) |
(40,904 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
2,771,176 |
|
1,760,618 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Oil and gas property expenditures |
|
(4,169,531 |
) |
(852,749 |
) |
||
Proceeds from sale of oil and gas properties |
|
732,729 |
|
533,142 |
|
||
Gas gathering and other equipment expenditures |
|
(159,454 |
) |
(34,879 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
(3,596,256 |
) |
(354,486 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Repayments of notes payable |
|
(13,284,652 |
) |
(6,882 |
) |
||
Proceeds from issuance of common stock and warrants |
|
25,000,000 |
|
|
|
||
Proceeds from issuance of subordinated convertible note payable |
|
35,000,000 |
|
|
|
||
Debt issue costs related to PHAWK, LLC Transaction |
|
(1,303,965 |
) |
|
|
||
Equity offering costs related to PHAWK, LLC Transaction |
|
(682,797 |
) |
|
|
||
Preferred stock dividends paid |
|
(224,187 |
) |
(222,964 |
) |
||
Acquisition of treasury stock |
|
|
|
(8,255 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
44,504,399 |
|
(238,101 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
43,679,319 |
|
1,168,031 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, at beginning of period |
|
2,109,681 |
|
927,313 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, at end of period |
|
$ |
45,789,000 |
|
$ |
2,095,344 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash paid for: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Interest |
|
$ |
472,291 |
|
$ |
287,057 |
|
Income taxes |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
20,500 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part to these condensed consolidated financial statements
5
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
PETROHAWK ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements of Petrohawk Energy Corporation (formerly known as Beta Oil & Gas, Inc.) and subsidiaries (Petrohawk or the Company) have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and with the instructions of Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited financial statements contain all adjustments necessary to present fairly the Companys financial position as of June 30, 2004 and the results of its operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 and cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003. Management believes all such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. The results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for a full year. Although we believe that the disclosures in these financial statements are adequate to make the information presented not misleading, certain information normally included in financial statements and related footnotes prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC). The December 31, 2003 consolidated balance sheet was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The accompanying financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements as contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 that was filed April 20, 2004.
PHAWK, LLC Transaction
On December 12, 2003, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement with PHAWK, LLC, formerly known as Petrohawk Energy, LLC (PHAWK, LLC), a privately-held independent exploration and production company headquartered in Houston, Texas, pursuant to which PHAWK, LLC agreed to a cash investment of $60,000,000 in the Companys common stock, warrants and a convertible note. On May 25, 2004, the Companys stockholders approved the transaction with PHAWK, LLC (the PHAWK, LLC Transaction), whereby the Company received $25,000,000 for the issuance of 7,575,757 shares of its common stock and 5,000,000 five-year common stock purchase warrants exercisable at a price of $3.30 per share. Additionally, the Company issued a $35,000,000 convertible note that is an unsecured five-year obligation that after two years will be convertible by the holder into the Companys common stock at a conversion price of $4.00 per share. Interest only will be payable under the note in quarterly installments at the rate of 8% per annum. The full amount of the principal and accrued and unpaid interest will be payable on the fifth anniversary of the date of the note.
The Company incurred approximately $2.2 million in offering costs related to the PHAWK, LLC Transaction. Approximately $1.3 million of the costs were allocated to debt issue costs based upon the face value of the subordinated note payable to the total proceeds received by the Company. The debt issue costs are being amortized over a five-year period. The remaining $.9 million of costs, including $.2 million incurred in 2003, are included as equity offering costs and are reflected as a reduction to Stockholders Equity.
Future use of these proceeds will include acquisitions of oil and gas properties, future development and exploitation of existing and acquired oil and gas properties and exploration activity. Approximately $13.3 million of these proceeds were used to repay all of the Companys existing long-term bank debt.
6
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications of prior period amounts have been made to conform to current period presentation.
Oil and Gas Properties
The Company accounts for its oil and gas producing activities using the full cost method of accounting as prescribed by the SEC. Accordingly, all costs incurred in the acquisition, exploration, and development of proved oil and gas properties, including the costs of abandoned properties, dry holes, geophysical costs, and annual lease rentals are capitalized. All general corporate costs are expensed as incurred. In general, sales or other dispositions of oil and gas properties are accounted for as adjustments to capitalized costs, with no gain or loss recorded; unless the adjustments would significantly alter the relationship between capitalized costs and proved reserves. Amortization of evaluated oil and gas properties is computed on the units of production method based on all proved reserves on a country-by-country basis. Unevaluated oil and gas properties are assessed at least annually for impairment either individually or on an aggregate basis, if the properties have similar characteristics. The net capitalized costs of evaluated oil and gas properties are subject to a full cost ceiling limitation in which the costs are not allowed to exceed their related estimated future net revenues discounted at 10%, net of tax considerations. Any impairments to unevaluated properties are recorded as transfers to the full cost pool.
With the volatility of commodity prices and the possibility of exploration expenditures resulting in no significant proved reserve additions, it is possible that future impairments of oil and gas properties could occur. The price measurement date is on the last day of the quarter or year-end as required by SEC rules.
2. ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS
The Company adopted SFAS No. 143 effective January 1, 2003. SFAS No. 143 requires that the fair value of an asset retirement cost, and corresponding liability, should be recorded as part of the cost of the related long-lived asset and subsequently allocated to expense using a systematic and rational method. Upon adoption, the Company recorded an asset retirement obligation of $913,560 to reflect the Companys legal obligations related to future plugging and abandonment of its wells. The Company estimated the expected cash flow associated with the obligation and discounted the amount using a credit-adjusted, risk-free interest rate of 8%. The transition adjustment resulting from the adoption of SFAS No. 143, and reported as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, was an increase to income of $1,640 in 2003. There was no comparable adjustment in 2004.
The Company recorded the following activity related to the liability for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003:
|
|
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED |
|
||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||
Beginning balance liability for asset retirement obligations |
|
$ |
1,234,720 |
|
$ |
|
|
Initial liability for asset retirement obligations as of January 1, 2003 |
|
|
|
913,560 |
|
||
Obligations incurred |
|
(2,526 |
) |
(40,904 |
) |
||
Accretion expense |
|
46,052 |
|
27,406 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Ending balance liability for asset retirement obligations |
|
$ |
1,278,246 |
|
$ |
900,062 |
|
7
At June 30, 2004, $171,860 of the liability for asset retirement obligations balance is classified as current and presented as a separate line item on the consolidated balance sheet.
3. STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
Stock Split
On May 18 2004, the Companys Board of Directors approved a one-for-two reverse stock split that was effective May 26, 2004. The reverse split was implemented to effect the conditional approval by The NASDAQ National Market of the Companys listing application, which was later formally approved.
Share and per share data (except par value) for periods presented have been restated to reflect the reverse stock split.
Stock -Based Compensation
On January 1, 2003, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (SFAS No. 123), as amended by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 148 Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure (SFAS No. 148), in accounting for its employee and director stock options and applies the fair value based method of accounting to such options using the prospective method as defined by SFAS No. 148. Under SFAS No. 123, the fair value of each option granted is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Previous to the adoption, the Company elected to follow Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (APB 25) and related interpretations in accounting for its employee stock options. However, as required by SFAS No. 123, the Company disclosed on a pro forma basis the impact of the fair value accounting for employee stock options. Transactions in equity instruments with non-employees for goods or services have been accounted for using the fair value method as prescribed by SFAS No. 123.
Since the Company adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 prospectively for all employee awards granted, modified or settled after January 1, 2003, the cost related to stock-based compensation included in the determination of income for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 is less than that which would have been recognized if the fair value method had been applied to all awards since the original effective date of SFAS No. 123. Awards vest over periods ranging from one to three years. The following table illustrates the effect on net income (loss) and earnings (loss) per share as if the fair value based method had been applied to all outstanding and unvested awards in each period.
|
|
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED |
|
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED |
|
||||||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net income (loss) applicable to common stockholders as reported |
|
$ |
(1,503,736 |
) |
$ |
75,488 |
|
$ |
(602,993 |
) |
$ |
(51,549 |
) |
Add: Stock-based compensation expense included in reported net income (loss) |
|
2,003,464 |
|
163,250 |
|
2,027,216 |
|
165,979 |
|
||||
Deduct: Total stock-based compensation expense determined under fair value method for all awards |
|
(668,037 |
) |
(202,734 |
) |
(725,389 |
) |
(247,822 |
) |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Pro forma net income (loss) applicable to common stockholders |
|
$ |
(168,309 |
) |
$ |
36,004 |
|
$ |
698,834 |
|
$ |
(133,392 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Income (loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Basic as reported |
|
$ |
(0.16 |
) |
$ |
0.01 |
|
$ |
(0.08 |
) |
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
Basic pro forma |
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
$ |
0.01 |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Diluted as reported |
|
$ |
(0.16 |
) |
$ |
0.01 |
|
$ |
(0.08 |
) |
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
Diluted pro forma |
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
$ |
0.01 |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
8
The fair value of each grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The weighted average assumptions used for options granted in 2003 include expected volatility of approximately 61.3%, a risk-free interest rate of 3.15% and expected lives of 5.2 years.
During the second quarter of 2004, and in connection with the PHAWK, LLC Transaction, the Company recorded $1,979,712 of non-cash stock-based compensation expense related to employee stock options as follows:
$182,516 of stock-based compensation expense as a result of the accelerated vesting of certain stock options of employees who were employed on May 25, 2004 (closing of the PHAWK, LLC Transaction).
$1,797,196 of stock-based compensation expense as a result of the modification of certain stock options of employees whereby the period for which the employee has to exercise was extended to the earlier of the option expiration date or five years from the date of the closing of PHAWK, LLC Transaction.
Additionally, $47,504 of stock-based compensation was recorded during the six month period under the amortization of the certain employee stock options granted after the Companys adoption of FAS 123 effective January 1, 2003.
Stock Options Grants
No options were granted during the six months ended June 30, 2004.
Common Stock Warrants
During the second quarter of 2004, and in connection with the PHAWK, LLC Transaction, the Company issued PHAWK, LLC 5,000,000 five-year common stock purchase warrants at a price of $3.30 per share. The warrants are exercisable at any time and expire on May 25, 2009.
Treasury Stock
Effective January 14, 2003, the Companys Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program for up to an aggregate of 50,000 shares of the Companys common stock. Purchases may be made in the open market, at prevailing market prices, or in privately negotiated transactions from time to time, and will depend on market conditions, business opportunities and other factors. Any purchases are expected to be made in compliance with the safe harbor provisions of Rule 10b-18 promulgated by the SEC under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.
9
The Company did not purchase any shares during the six months ended June 30, 2004. During the six-month period ended June 30, 2003, the Company purchased 5,375 shares for $8,255, or $1.54 per share. At June 30, 2004, the Company held 8,382 treasury shares.
4 . NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE
|
|
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED |
|
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED |
|
||||||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||||
Basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(1,393,361 |
) |
$ |
186,970 |
|
$ |
(381,136 |
) |
$ |
170,189 |
|
Less: Preferred dividends |
|
(110,375 |
) |
(111,482 |
) |
(221,857 |
) |
(221,738 |
) |
||||
Net income (loss) applicable to common stockholders |
|
$ |
(1,503,736 |
) |
$ |
75,488 |
|
$ |
(602,993 |
) |
$ |
(51,549 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Weighted average number of common shares |
|
9,211,657 |
|
6,214,661 |
|
7,713,155 |
|
6,216,896 |
|
||||
Basic earnings (loss) per share |
|
$ |
(0.16 |
) |
$ |
0.01 |
|
$ |
(0.08 |
) |
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net income (loss) applicable to common stockholders |
|
$ |
(1,503,736 |
) |
$ |
75,488 |
|
$ |
(602,993 |
) |
$ |
(51,549 |
) |
Add: Preferred dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net income (loss) for diluted earnings (loss) per share |
|
$ |
(1,503,736 |
) |
$ |
75,488 |
|
$ |
(602,993 |
) |
$ |
(51,549 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Weighted average number of common shares |
|
9,211,657 |
|
6,214,661 |
|
7,713,155 |
|
6,216,896 |
|
||||
Common stock equivalent shares representing shares issuable upon exercise of stock options |
|
Antidilutive |
|
23,759 |
|
Antidilutive |
|
Antidilutive |
|
||||
Common stock equivalent shares representing shares issuable upon exercise of warrants |
|
Antidilutive |
|
Antidilutive |
|
Antidilutive |
|
Antidilutive |
|
||||
Common stock equivalent shares representing shares as-if conversion of preferred shares |
|
Antidilutive |
|
Antidilutive |
|
Antidilutive |
|
Antidilutive |
|
||||
Weighted average number of shares used in calculation of diluted income (loss) per share |
|
9,211,657 |
|
6,238,420 |
|
7,713,155 |
|
6,216,896 |
|
||||
Diluted earnings (loss) per share |
|
$ |
(0.16 |
) |
$ |
0.01 |
|
$ |
(0.08 |
) |
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
The following common stock equivalents were not included in the computation for diluted loss per share because their effects were antidilutive.
10
|
|
JUNE 30, |
|
||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock Equivalents: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive stock options |
|
396,292 |
|
362,291 |
|
Non-qualified options |
|
352,500 |
|
317,500 |
|
Warrants |
|
5,919,500 |
|
919,500 |
|
As-if conversion of subordinated note payable |
|
8,750,000 |
|
|
|
As-if conversion of preferred stock |
|
604,271 |
|
604,271 |
|
|
|
16,022,563 |
|
2,203,562 |
|
5. LONG-TERM DEBT
On May 25, 2004, and in connection with the PHAWK, LLC Transaction, the Company issued a $35,000,000, five-year unsecured subordinated note payable to PHAWK, LLC. The note payable bears interest at 8%, is payable quarterly until maturity and is convertible after two years to common stock of the Company at a conversion price of $4.00. The full amount of the principal and accrued and unpaid interest will be payable on May 25, 2009.
During 2003, the Companys revolving credit agreement with a commercial bank was re-determined and its maturity extended to April 1, 2005. At June 30, 2004, the $25,000,000 credit facility had a borrowing base of $13,444,000, which is subject to an automatic monthly reduction of $88,000 that commenced July 31, 2003 and is collateralized by the Companys oil and gas properties and gas gathering system and related assets. At June 30, 2004, there were no outstanding borrowings under the credit agreement. The Company pays a commitment fee equal to 0.25% (1/4 of a percentage point) on the unused portion of the borrowing base, which was approximately $223,000 at June 30, 2004, due quarterly in arrears. The next re-determination for the borrowing base will occur in November 2004.
At June 30, 2004, the Company had various outstanding letters of credit of $201,000, which reduces the amount available under the borrowing base. The Company pays an annual renewal of 2.25% of the face amount of the letters of credit.
6. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES
Natural Gas - During the six months ended June 30, 2004, the Company had no outstanding commodity price hedging contracts. From time to time, the Company may hedge a portion of its natural gas production and use costless collars, swaps or a combination of those derivatives when hedging
For the contracts settled during the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, the Company had realized losses of $185,107 and $1,034,332, respectively. The impact of the natural gas hedges reduced the Companys average natural gas price received for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003 by $0.39 per Mcf and $1.11 per Mcf, respectively. Based on the actual average daily natural gas production for the six months ended June 30, 2003, approximately 48% of the Companys natural gas production was hedged for this period. Hedge ineffectiveness was not material during this period.
11
Crude Oil - During the six months ended June 30, 2004, the Company had no outstanding commodity price hedging contracts. From time to time, the Company may hedge a portion of its crude oil production and use costless collars, swaps or a combination of those derivatives when hedging.
For the contracts settled during the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, the Company had realized losses of $19,939 and $201,723, respectively. The impact of the crude oil hedges reduced the Companys average crude price received for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003 by $0.71 per Bbl and 3.51 per Bbl, respectively. Based on the actual average daily crude oil production for the six months ended June 30, 2003, approximately 39% of the Companys crude oil production was hedged for this period. Hedge ineffectiveness was not material during this period.
7. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
From time to time, the Company is a party to ordinary routine litigation incidental to our business. We are not currently a party to any pending litigation, and we are not aware of any threatened litigation that would in the opinion of our legal counsel, have a significant impact on the financial statements. We have not been a party to any bankruptcy, receivership, reorganization, adjustment or similar proceeding.
8. SUBSEQUENT EVENT
On August 11, 2004, the Company purchased working interests in certain oil and gas properties and various other assets from PHAWK, LLC for $8.5 million. The effective date of the acquisition is June 1, 2004 and the effects of this transaction will first be reported in the Companys financial statements for the quarter ending September 30, 2004.
A Special Committee of one disinterested director was formed by the Companys board of directors to evaluate, negotiate and complete the purchase. The Special Committee hired an independent reservoir engineering firm to provide a reserve evaluation and engaged an independent financial advisor to evaluate the fairness, from a financial point of view, to the Company. The independent financial advisor has rendered a fairness opinion to the Special Committee.
12
The following discussion is to inform you about our financial position, liquidity and capital resources as of June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 and the results of operations for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003.
Disclosure Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
Included in this report are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, included in this Form 10-Q that address activities, events or developments that the Company expects or anticipates will or may occur in the future are forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements speak only as of the date made and the Company undertakes no obligation to update such forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of the words believes, intends, expects, anticipates, projects, estimates, predicts and similar expressions that contemplate future events.
These future events include the following matters:
Estimates of proved reserve quantities and net present values of those reserves
Reserve potential
Business strategy
Capital expenditures amount and types
Financial position
Budgets
Expansion and growth of our business and operations
Expansion and development trends of the oil and gas industry
Production of oil and gas reserves
Exploration prospects and property acquisitions
Wells to be drilled and drilling results
Operating results and working capital
Marketing of natural gas and oil
Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, we can give no assurance that such expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements will prove to have been correct.
All forward-looking statements contained in this report are based on assumptions believed to be reasonable.
We can give no assurance that such expectations and assumptions will prove to be correct. Reserve estimates of oil and gas properties are generally different from the quantities of oil and natural gas that are ultimately recovered or found. This is particularly true for estimates applied to exploratory prospects and new production. Additionally, any statements contained in this report regarding forward-looking statements are subject to various known and unknown risks, uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond our control.
Numerous important factors, risks and uncertainties may affect the Companys operating results, including:
the risks associated with exploration;
the ability to find, acquire, market, develop and produce new properties;
natural gas and oil price volatility;
uncertainties in the estimation of proved reserves and in the projection of production of proved reserves;
future rates of production and timing of development expenditures;
operating hazards attendant to the natural gas and oil business;
13
downhole drilling and completion risks that are generally not recoverable from third parties or insurance;
potential mechanical failure or under-performance of significant wells;
climatic conditions;
availability and cost of material and equipment;
delays in anticipated start-up dates;
actions or inactions of third-party operators of the Companys properties;
the ability to find and retain skilled personnel;
availability of capital;
the strength and financial resources of competitors;
regulatory developments;
environmental risks; and
general economic conditions, including wars and acts of terrorism.
These and other risks and uncertainties, which are more fully described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A filed with the SEC, could cause actual results and developments to be materially different from those expressed or implied by any of these forward-looking statements. Such things may cause actual results, performance, achievements or expectations to differ materially from the anticipated results, performance, achievements or expectations.
On December 12, 2003, we entered into a securities purchase agreement with PHAWK, LLC pursuant to which we agreed to issue to PHAWK, LLC for an aggregate of $60,000,000 in cash:
7,575,757 shares of our common stock;
five year warrants to purchase up to an additional 5,000,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $3.30 per share; and
a convertible promissory note in the face amount of $35,000,000 which will be convertible after two years into shares of our common stock at a conversion price of $4.00 per share.
On May 25, 2004, the PHAWK, LLC Transaction was approved by the stockholders of the Company. Because issuance of the shares of common stock to PHAWK, LLC in connection with this transaction resulted in a change of control of the Company as defined in the NASDAQ rules, we were required by the rules of The Nasdaq Stock Market to obtain stockholder approval of the issuance of the shares.
In the first six months of 2004, a sustained improvement in our financial condition was a result of higher cash flows from operations. A continuation of favorable commodity price environment and increasing production rates were the primary factors for the improving cash flow. With the success of our exploration, exploitation and development activity in the last half of 2003 and first six months of 2004, our current production rates have increased. Our net daily average production rate for the six months ended June 30, 2004 was approximately 8.1 MMcfe compared to 7.0 MMcfe for the same period ended in 2003, a 16% increase. We continue to be optimistic about the long-term outlook for natural gas and crude oil pricing, but realize that the overall environment for commodity pricing is very volatile and can be materially affected, favorably or unfavorably, by such factors as global uncertainty, imports/exports, weather trends, power generation and industrial demands.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
A companys liquidity is the amount of time expected to elapse until an asset can be converted to cash or conversely until a liability has to be paid. Liquidity is one indication of a companys ability to meet its obligations or commitments. Historically, our major sources of liquidity have come from internally generated cash flow from operations and proceeds from public and private stock offerings.
14
The following table represents the sources and uses of cash for the periods indicated.
|
|
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED |
|
||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||
Beginning cash balance |
|
$ |
2,109,681 |
|
$ |
927,313 |
|
Sources of cash: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash provided by operations |
|
2,771,176 |
|
1,760,618 |
|
||
Cash provided by sales of oil and gas properties |
|
732,729 |
|
533,142 |
|
||
Cash provided by financing activities |
|
60,000,000 |
|
|
|
||
Total sources of cash including cash on hand |
|
65,613,586 |
|
3,221,073 |
|
||
Uses of cash: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Oil and gas expenditures |
|
(4,169,531 |
) |
(852,749 |
) |
||
Gas gathering and other equipment expenditures |
|
(159,454 |
) |
(34,879 |
) |
||
Cash used by financing activities |
|
(15,495,601 |
) |
(238,101 |
) |
||
Total uses of cash |
|
(19,824,586 |
) |
(1,125,729 |
) |
||
Ending cash balance |
|
$ |
45,789,000 |
|
$ |
2,095,344 |
|
Working capital and liquidity
At June 30, 2004, the Companys working capital was $47.1 million, compared to $2.2 million at December 31, 2003. Our working capital and liquidity have shown continual improvement as a result of the PHAWK, LLC Transaction and due to higher cash flows from operations. Additionally, at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, we had no futures derivative liability associated with our future production volume.
Our principal source of short-term liquidity is from internally-generated cash flow. Should natural gas and crude oil prices decrease materially, our current operating cash flow would decrease and our liquidity and working capital position would be negatively impacted and could adversely impact our growth capability.
Current borrowing base
The current credit agreement, which was re-determined and extended during the quarter ended June 30, 2003, has a maturity date of April 1, 2005 and at June 30, 2004, had a borrowing capacity of $13,444,000 subject to an automatic monthly reduction of $88,000, which commenced on July 31, 2003. At June 30, 2004, there were no borrowings outstanding.
At June 30, 2004, the Company had various outstanding letters of credit of $201,000, which reduces the amount available under the borrowing base. The Company pays an annual renewal of 2.25% of the face amount of the letter of credit.
Long Term Liquidity and Capital Resources
We have no material long-term commitments associated with our capital expenditure plans or operating agreements. Consequently, we have a significant degree of flexibility to adjust the level of such expenditures as circumstances warrant. The level of capital expenditures will vary in future periods depending on the success we have with our exploitation, developmental and exploration activities in future periods, gas and oil price conditions and other related economic factors. Currently no sources of liquidity or financing are provided by off-balance sheet arrangements or transactions with unconsolidated, limited-purpose entities. The following tables show our contractual obligations and commitments:
|
|
Payments Due by Period |
|
|||||||||||||
Contractual Obligations |
|
Total |
|
Less than 1 |
|
1-3 years |
|
4-5 years |
|
After 5 years |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Subordinated Debt |
|
$ |
35,000,000 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
35,000,000 |
|
$ |
|
|
Operating Leases |
|
50,116 |
|
26,787 |
|
23,329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total Cash Obligations |
|
$ |
35,050,116 |
|
$ |
26,787 |
|
$ |
23,329 |
|
$ |
35,000,000 |
|
$ |
|
|
15
|
|
Amount of Commitment Expiration per Period |
|
||||||||||
Other
Commercial |
|
Total |
|
Less than 1 |
|
1-3 years |
|
4-5 years |
|
After 5 years |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Standby letters of credit |
|
$ |
201,000 |
|
$ |
201,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We are obligated to pay dividends of approximately $110,000 per quarter on the 8% Convertible Preferred Stock.
For the six months ended June 30, 2004, we had capital expenditures of approximately $4.3 million. The Companys available capital as a result of the PHAWK, LLC Transaction would allow for the additional capital deployment should drilling or other opportunities be presented to the Company for consideration.
Significant Accounting Policies
We rely on certain accounting policies in the preparation of our financial statements. Certain judgments and uncertainties affect the application of such policies. Certain accounting principles are employed in the adherence and implementation of these policies along with management judgments. The following is a discussion of each policy and how certain judgments and/or uncertainties could materially impact these policies:
Use of Estimates - The preparation of our condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires our management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, if any, at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The estimates include oil and gas reserve quantities, which form the basis for the calculation of amortization and impairment of oil and gas properties. We emphasize that reserve estimates are inherently imprecise and that estimates of more recent discoveries are more imprecise than those for properties with long production histories. Actual results could materially differ from these estimates. Volatility in commodity prices also impacts reserve estimates since future revenues from production may decline significantly if there is a material decrease in natural gas and/or crude oil prices from the previous reserve estimation date, which is at each quarter end.
Oil and gas properties - We account for our oil and gas producing activities using the full cost method of accounting. Accordingly, all costs incurred in the acquisition, exploration, and development of proved oil and gas properties, including the costs of abandoned properties, dry holes, geophysical costs, and annual lease rentals are capitalized. All general corporate costs are expensed as incurred. In general, sales or other dispositions of oil and gas properties are accounted for as adjustments to capitalized costs, with no gain or loss recorded, unless the adjustments would significantly alter the relationship between capitalized costs and proved reserves. Amortization of evaluated oil and gas properties is computed on the units of production method based on all proved reserve quantities. The net capitalized costs of evaluated oil and gas properties adjusted for deferred tax effects (full cost ceiling limitation) are not to exceed their related estimated future net revenues discounted at 10%, and the lower of cost or estimated fair value of unevaluated properties, net of tax considerations. Unevaluated oil and gas properties are assessed at least annually for impairment either individually or on an aggregate basis. Unevaluated leasehold costs, including brokerage costs, are individually assessed quarterly based on the remaining primary term of the leasehold. During the six month period ended June 30, 2004, unevaluated leasehold costs and related brokerage fees of $149,190 were transferred to U.S. evaluated costs, or the full cost pool. For the remaining costs, which includes seismic and geological and geophysical primarily related to Jackson County, Texas, historically we have estimated reserve potential for the unevaluated properties using comparable producing areas or wells and risk that estimate by 50-75%. As mentioned previously in Use of Estimates, reserve estimations are more imprecise for new or unevaluated areas. Consequently, should certain geological conditions or factors exist, such as reservoir depletion, reservoir faulting, reservoir quality etc., but unknown to us at the time of our assessment, a materially different result could occur.
Derivative instruments and hedging activity We use derivatives in a limited manner to protect against commodity price volatility. Effectively, we sell a portion of our natural gas and crude oil based on a NYMEX based price with a set floor (bottom) and ceiling (top) price or a range. Our derivatives are recorded on the balance sheet at fair value and changes in the fair value of derivatives are recorded each period in current earnings or other comprehensive income, depending on whether a derivative is designated as part of a hedge transaction and, if it is, depending on the
16
type of transaction. Typically, our derivative contract will consist of a cash flow hedge transaction in which it hedges the variability of cash flow related to a forecasted transaction. Changes in the fair value of these derivative instruments are recorded in other comprehensive income and reclassified as earnings in the periods in which earnings are impacted by the variability of the cash flows of the hedged item. The fair value of these contracts may vary materially with the fluctuations of natural gas and crude oil prices. However, the fluctuation in fair value will be offset by the actual value received from the hedged volume.
Stock-based compensation - - On January 1, 2003, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (SFAS No. 123), as amended by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure (SFAS No. 148), in accounting for our employee and director stock options using the prospective method as defined by SFAS No. 148. Under SFAS No. 123, the fair value of each option granted is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Previous to the adoption, the Company elected to follow accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (APB No. 25) and related interpretations in accounting for its employee stock options. However, as required by SFAS No. 123, the Company disclosed on a pro forma basis the impact of the fair value accounting for employee stock options. Transactions in equity instruments with non-employees for goods or services have been accounted for using the fair value method as prescribed by SFAS No. 123.
Comparison of Results of Operations
Quarter ended June 30, 2004 and Compared to Quarter ended June 30, 2003
We had a net loss of $1.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004 compared to net income of $0.2 million for the same period ended 2003. Non-cash stock-based compensation expense of $2.0 million was offset by significantly higher natural gas and crude oil price environment, higher natural gas and crude oil sales volumes and lower depletion expense. The increase was partially offset by higher lease operating expense and higher general and administrative expenses when compared to same period for last year.
The following table summarizes key items of comparison for the periods indicated. Dollars, except for per unit data, and production data are in thousands.
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net Production Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Natural Gas (MMcf) |
|
577 |
|
471 |
|
||
Crude Oil (MBbl) |
|
36 |
|
28 |
|
||
Equivalent Production (Mmcfe) |
|
795 |
|
640 |
|
||
Average Daily Production (Mmcfe) |
|
8.7 |
|
7.0 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Average Sales Price (1): |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Natural Gas (per Mcf) |
|
$ |
5.88 |
|
$ |
4.53 |
|
Crude Oil (per Bbl) |
|
$ |
35.22 |
|
$ |
26.49 |
|
Equivalent price (per Mcfe) |
|
$ |
6.16 |
|
$ |
4.63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Expenses ($per Mcfe): |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Lease Operations |
|
$ |
1.08 |
|
$ |
0.87 |
|
Production, severance and ad valorem taxes $0.33 |
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
|
|
|
General and administrative (2) |
|
$ |
2.04 |
|
$ |
0.74 |
|
DD&A (3) |
|
$ |
1.44 |
|
$ |
1.91 |
|
Interest |
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
(1) Includes impact of hedging |
|
||||
(2) Excludes Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
(3) Includes DD&A for oil and gas properties only |
|
|
|
|
|
17
Oil and gas sales:
For the three months ended June 30, 2004, oil and gas sales increased $1.9 million or 65%, from the same period in 2002, to $4.9 million. The increase for the three months was a result of higher natural gas and crude oil prices received and higher sales volumes during the quarter ended June 30, 2004. Natural gas storage level concerns, crude oil supply uncertainty due to global events and a weaker U.S. dollar, which impacts the OPEC basket price, favorably impacted commodity prices during the period. In turn, natural gas prices have remained stronger due to the higher crude oil prices and seasonal demand during the quarter. The prices received for our natural gas and crude oil during the quarter ended June 30, 2003 were also unfavorably impacted by our commodity hedges, as discussed further below under Hedging.
The higher commodity prices resulted in an increase in oil and gas revenues. The increase in production was a result of our drilling activity in the Broussard, Louisiana and Brookshire Dome, Texas properties and the drilling and recompletion activity during the last half of 2003 and this quarter on the WEHLU, Oklahoma properties. Our incremental increase in production from these areas was partially offset by the natural decline in the production rates from our offshore Louisiana and South Texas properties.
Hedging:
Generally, we sell our natural gas and crude oil to various purchasers on an indexed-based or spot price. The indices for natural gas are generally affected by the NYMEX Henry Hub spot prices while the posted prices for crude oil are generally affected by the NYMEX-Crude Oil West Texas Intermediate prices. From time to time, we use financial derivative instruments on a limited basis to lessen the impact of price volatility.
For the three months ended June 30, 2004, we had no hedges on our production. Oil and gas revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2003 were reduced by approximately $205,000 due to our oil and gas hedges. For the three months ended June 30, 2003, the average sales price received for our natural gas was reduced by approximately $0.39 per Mcf from our natural gas hedges and the average sales price received for our crude oil was reduced by approximately $0.71 per Bbl from our crude oil hedges
Lease operations expense and production tax expenses:
Lease operations expense increased $0.3 million, or 55%, to $0.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004 compared to the same period for 2003. The increase was primarily due to higher operating expense associated with our offshore Louisiana properties, the Peace Creek and Zenith Field, Kansas properties and recently drilled wells in South Central Kansas and WEHLU, Oklahoma.
Production severance and ad valorem taxes increased $57,900, or 28%, for the three months ended June 30, 2004 as compared to the same period ended in 2003, due to higher natural gas and crude oil revenues. Production taxes are generally assessed as a percentage of gross oil and/or natural gas sales amounts or volumes.
General and administrative expense:
General and administrative expense for the three months ended June 30, 2004 increased $1.1 million, or 240%, to $1.6 million compared to $0.5 million for the same period in 2003. The increase was due primarily to costs incurred as a result of the closing of PHAWK, LLC Transaction. The significant components of the increase were $0.7 million of severance expense, $0.1 million of incremental salary and benefits for new employees and $0.1 million of costs associated with the transition of the corporate headquarters from Tulsa, Oklahoma to Houston, Texas.
Depreciation, depletion and amortization expense:
Depletion, depreciation and amortization expense for oil and gas properties decreased $0.1 million, or 6%, from the same period in 2003 to $1.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004. Depletion for oil and gas properties is calculated using the Unit of Production method, which essentially amortizes the capitalized costs associated with the evaluated properties based on the ratio of production volume for the current period to total remaining reserve volume for the evaluated properties. The decrease in oil and gas depletion was largely due to the increase in our December 31, 2003 proved reserves. The depletion rates per Mcf for the three months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 were $1.44 per Mcf and $1.91 per Mcf, respectively.
Depreciation and amortization expense for other assets includes depreciation associated with the gathering assets, which is calculated on a unit of revenue method. The unit of revenue method amortizes the capitalized costs
18
associated with the gathering assets based on the ratio of gross actual revenues for the current period to the total remaining gross revenues for the gathering assets. Depreciation expense for the three month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 was $43,700 and $56,200, respectively.
Interest expense:
Interest expense increased for three months ended June 30, 2004 as compared to the same period 2003 by approximately $0.3 million due to a lower outstanding commercial debt balance and the issuance of the $35 million subordinated 8% note issued in the PHAWK, LLC Transaction.
Six months ended June 30, 2004 and Compared to Six months ended June 30, 2003
We had a net loss of $0.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004 compared to a net income of $0.2 million for the same period ended 2003. Non-cash stock-based compensation expense of $2.0 million was offset by significantly higher natural gas and crude oil price environment, higher natural gas and crude oil sales volumes and lower depletion expense. The increase was partially offset by higher lease operating expense and higher general and administrative expenses when compared to same period for last year.
The following table summarizes key items of comparison for the periods indicated. Dollars, except for per unit data, and production data are in thousands.
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net Production Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Natural Gas (MMcf) |
|
1,058 |
|
926 |
|
||
Crude Oil (MBbl) |
|
70 |
|
57 |
|
||
Equivalent Production (Mmcfe) |
|
1,478 |
|
1,270 |
|
||
Average Daily Production (Mmcfe) |
|
8.1 |
|
7.0 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Average Sales Price (1): |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Natural Gas (per Mcf) |
|
$ |
6.03 |
|
$ |
4.62 |
|
Crude Oil (per Bbl) |
|
$ |
35.22 |
|
$ |
26.10 |
|
Equivalent price (per Mcfe) |
|
$ |
5.99 |
|
$ |
4.69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Expenses ($per Mcfe): |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Lease Operations |
|
$ |
1.07 |
|
$ |
0.89 |
|
Production, severance and ad valorem taxes |
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
General and administrative (2) |
|
$ |
1.64 |
|
$ |
0.98 |
|
DD&A (3) |
|
$ |
1.47 |
|
$ |
1.97 |
|
Interest |
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
(1) Includes impact of hedging |
|
|
|
||
(2) Excludes Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
(3) Includes DD&A for oil and gas properties only |
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and gas sales:
For the six months ended June 30, 2004, oil and gas sales increased $2.9 million, or 49%, from the same period in 2003, to $8.8 million. The increase for the six months was a result of higher natural gas and crude oil prices received and higher sales volumes during the six months ended June 30, 2004. Natural gas storage level concerns, crude oil supply uncertainty due to global events and a weaker U.S. dollar, which impacts the OPEC basket price, favorably impacted commodity prices during the period. In turn, natural gas prices have remained stronger due to the higher crude oil prices and seasonal demand during the quarter. The prices received for our natural gas and crude oil during the six months ended June 30, 2003 were also unfavorably impacted by our commodity hedges, as discussed further below under Hedging.
19
The higher commodity prices resulted in an increase in oil and gas revenues of $2.9 million, with higher natural gas prices comprising 66% of the increase. The increase in production was a result of our drilling activity in the Broussard, Louisiana and Brookshire Dome, Texas properties and the drilling and recompletion activity during the last half of 2003 and this quarter on the WEHLU, Oklahoma properties. Our incremental increase in production from these areas was partially offset by the natural decline in the production rates from our offshore Louisiana and South Texas properties.
Hedging:
Generally, we sell our natural gas and crude oil to various purchasers on an indexed-based or spot price. The indices for natural gas are generally affected by the NYMEX Henry Hub spot prices while the posted prices for crude oil are generally affected by the NYMEX-Crude Oil West Texas Intermediate prices. From time to time, we use financial derivative instruments on a limited basis to lessen the impact of price volatility.
For the six months ended June 30, 2004, we had no hedges on our production. For the six months ended June 30, 2003, hedges covered approximately 48% of the Companys natural gas production and 39% of the Companys oil production. Oil and gas revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2003 were reduced by approximately $1,236,000 due to our oil and gas hedges. For the six months ended June 30, 2003, the average sales price received for our natural gas was reduced by approximately $1.11 per Mcf from our natural gas hedges and the average sales price received for our crude oil was reduced by approximately $3.51 per Bbl from our crude oil hedges.
Lease operations expense and production tax expenses:
Lease operations expense, excluding production taxes, increased $0.4 million, or 39%, to $1.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004 compared to the same period for 2003. The increase was primarily due to higher operating expense associated with our offshore Louisiana properties, the Peace Creek and Zenith Field, Kansas properties and recently drilled wells in South Central Kansas and WEHLU, Oklahoma.
Production tax expense increased $41,200, or 9%, for the six months ended June 30, 2004 as compared to the same period ended in 2003, due to higher natural gas and crude oil revenues. Production taxes are generally assessed as a percentage of gross oil and/or natural gas sales amounts or volumes.
General and administrative expense:
General and administrative expense for the six months ended June 30, 2004 increased $1.2 million, or 94%, to $2.4 million compared to $1.2 million for the same period in 2003. The increase was due primarily to costs associated with the PHAWK, LLC Transaction. The significant components of the increase were $0.7 million of severance expense, $0.1 million of incremental salary and benefits for new employees and $0.1 million of costs associated with the transition of the corporate headquarters from Tulsa, Oklahoma to Houston, Texas.
Depreciation, depletion and amortization expense:
Depletion expense related to oil and gas properties decreased $0.3 million, or 13%, from the same period in 2003 to $2.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004. Depletion for oil and gas properties is calculated using the Unit of Production method, which essentially amortizes the capitalized costs associated with the evaluated properties based on the ratio of production volume for the current period to total remaining reserve volume for the evaluated properties. The decrease in oil and gas depletion was due to a lower depletion rate for the six months ended June 30, 2004, which resulted from an increase in our December 31, 2003 proved reserves. The depletion rates per Mcf for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 were $1.47 per Mcf and $1.97 per Mcf, respectively.
Depreciation and amortization expense for other assets includes depreciation associated with the gathering assets, which is calculated on a unit of revenue method. The unit of revenue method amortizes the capitalized costs associated with the gathering assets based on the ratio of gross actual revenues for the current period to the total remaining gross revenues for the gathering assets. Depreciation expense for the six month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 was $46,100 and $27,400, respectively.
20
Interest expense:
Interest expense increased for the six months ended June 30, 2004 as compared to the same period 2003 by approximately $0.2 million due to the issuance of the $35 million subordinated 8% note issued in the PHAWK, LLC Transaction.
Income Taxes
As of June 30, 2004, we had available, to reduce future taxable income, a U.S. federal regular net operating loss (NOL) carryforward of approximately $24.2 million and a U.S. federal alternative minimum tax NOL carryforward of approximately $21.1 million, which expire in the years 2018 through 2023. We also had various state NOL carryforwards at June 30, 2004, with varying lengths of allowable carryforward periods ranging from five to 20 years and can be used to offset future state taxable income. Based on past results and current forecasts, we have established a valuation allowance to reduce net deferred taxes to zero. We had $37,185 of alternative minimum tax expense for the six months ended June 30, 2004.
As a result of the transaction with PHAWK, LLC and the resulting change of control, the Companys utilization of the NOLs will be limited on an annual basis to 10% of the NOL carryforward. Given that the expiration dates of the NOLs are 14 to 19 years away, the Company believes that all NOLs will be available in future periods to reduce the Companys taxable income.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk
We are exposed to market risk related to adverse changes in oil and gas prices. Our oil and gas revenues can be significantly affected by volatile oil and gas prices. This volatility can be mitigated through the use of oil and gas financial instruments. At June 30, 2004, we had no outstanding derivative financial instruments.
Based on their evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer have concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report on Form 10-Q are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act are recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms.
During the period covered by this report on Form 10-Q, there have been no changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
21
Item 2 Changes in Securities, Use of Proceeds and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
On May 25, 2004, the Company issued certain securities as part of a transaction with PHAWK, LLC. The following securities, which take into account the 1-for-2 reverse stock split implemented by the Company on May 26, 2004, were issued by the Company pursuant to the PHAWK, LLC Transaction:
7,575,757 shares of common stock
5,000,000 stock purchase warrants at an exercise price of $3.30 per share
$35,000,000 subordinated note payable, convertible to common stock at $4.00 per share.
On July 15, 2004, Beta Oil & Gas, Inc. (a Nevada corporation) reincorporated into the Company (a Delaware corporation). The articles of incorporation, the certificate of designation for the Companys preferred stock, and the bylaws of the Company are substantially identical to the corresponding documents of Beta Oil & Gas, Inc. However, pursuant to stockholder approval obtained on July 15, 2004, the Company instituted a classified board and cumulative voting rights of stockholders were removed. In addition, provisions in the certificate of incorporation relating to the indemnification of officers and directors, as well as other differences, due to differing laws in Nevada and Delaware were made.
Item 4 Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
At our special meeting of the stockholders on May 25, 2004, the following items were voted upon:
1. Consider proposal to approve the issuance of certain securities related to the PHAWK, LLC Transaction;
2. To amend the articles of incorporation to increase the authorized common stock from 50,000,000 to 100,000,000;
The following table summarizes the tabulation of votes with respect to the foregoing matters:
|
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
|
Proposal 1: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PHAWK, LLC Transaction and related securities issuance: |
|
7,303,556 |
|
287,647 |
|
64,781 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proposal 2: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amend articles of incorporation to increase authorized common stock from 50,000,000 to 100,000,000: |
|
6,922,882 |
|
659,881 |
|
73,221 |
|
The Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company was held July 15, 2004 for the purpose of voting on the following items:
|
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
|
Proposal 1 Election of Directors: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floyd C. Wilson |
|
13,168,075 |
|
222,536 |
|
0 |
|
Tucker S. Bridwell |
|
13,075,600 |
|
313,511 |
|
0 |
|
James L. Irish III |
|
12,990,649 |
|
398,462 |
|
0 |
|
David B. Miller |
|
12,997,899 |
|
391,212 |
|
0 |
|
D. Martin Phillips |
|
13,166,075 |
|
223,036 |
|
0 |
|
Daniel Rioux |
|
13,243,776 |
|
145,335 |
|
0 |
|
Robert C. Stone, Jr. |
|
12,653,874 |
|
735,237 |
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proposal 2 Name change to Petrohawk Energy Corporation: |
|
13,337,044 |
|
38,770 |
|
13,297 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proposal 3 Reincorporation of the Company under the laws of Delaware: |
|
10,006,072 |
|
45,292 |
|
17,359 |
|
22
Proposal 4 Elimination of Cumulative Voting: |
|
9,270,080 |
|
766,330 |
|
32,313 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proposal 5 Adoption of a classified board of directors: |
|
9,698,045 |
|
348,163 |
|
22,515 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proposal 6 Amendment of Stock Option agreements existing on May 25, 2004 for certain employees: |
|
9,921,039 |
|
115,829 |
|
32,105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proposal 7 Approval of 2004 Non-Employee Incentive Plan: |
|
9,683,685 |
|
309,907 |
|
75,131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proposal 8 Approval of 2004 Employee Incentive Plan: |
|
9,672,891 |
|
321,616 |
|
74,216 |
|
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) The following documents are included as exhibits to this Form 10-Q. Those exhibits incorporated by reference are so indicated by the information supplied with respect thereto. Those exhibits which are not incorporated by reference are attached here to.
2.1 Agreement and Plan of Merger between Beta Oil & Gas, Inc. and Petrohawk Energy Corporation (Form of Agreement and Plan of Merger between Beta Oil & Gas, Inc. and Petrohawk Energy Corporation was attached as Appendix F to the Companys Definitive Proxy Statement filed June 23, 2004 is incorporated herein by reference);
3.1 Certificate of Incorporation for Petrohawk Energy Corporation (attaches as Exhibit 3.1 to the Form S-8 that the Company filed on July 29, 2004, which is incorporated herein by reference);
3.2 Bylaws of Petrohawk Energy Corporation attached hereto as Exhibit 3.2;
31.1 Certification of Periodic Report by the Chief Executive Officer under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2 Certification of Periodic Report by the Chief Financial Officer under Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1 Certification of Periodic Report by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
The following reports were filed on Form 8-K during the second quarter of 2004:
On May 12, 2004, the Company filed a Form 8-K under items 7 & 12 describing the release of its first quarter financial results and related press release.
On May 25, 2004, the Company filed a Form 8-K under items 1, 5 & 6 describing the change of control as a result of the completion of the transaction with PHAWK, LLC, the addition of new board of directors and officers of the Company and the resignation of directors.
On July 16, 2004, the Company filed a Form 8-K under items 5 & 6 describing the completion of the Companys annual meeting and the resignation of one director.
On July 20, 2004, the Company filed a Form 8-K under items 4 & 7 describing the change in the Companys independent accountants.
23
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned who is duly authorized.
|
PETROHAWK ENERGY CORPORATION |
|||
|
|
|
||
Date: August 13, 2004 |
By: |
|
/s/ Shane M. Bayless |
|
|
|
Shane M. Bayless |
||
|
|
Vice President - Chief
Financial Officer |
||
24