UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC  20549

 

FORM 10-Q

 

(Mark One)

 

ACCURIDE CORPORATION

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant:  (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes ý  No  o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes o  No  ý

 

As of July 31, 2004, 24,799 shares of Accuride Corporation common stock, par value $.01 per share, were outstanding.

 

 

ACCURIDE CORPORATION

 

Table of Contents

 

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
	Item 1. Financial Statements
		Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2004 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2003
		Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 (Unaudited)
		Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficiency) for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2004 (Unaudited)
		Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 (Unaudited)
		Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
	Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
	Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
	Item 4. Controls and Procedures
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
	Item 1. Legal Proceedings
	Item 2. Changes in Securities, Use of Proceeds and Issuer Purchase of Equity Securities
	Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
	Signatures

 

2

 

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item I. Financial Statements

 

ACCURIDE CORPORATION

 

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)

 

		June 30, 2004			December 31, 2003
		(Unaudited)
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents		$	40,879		$	42,692
Customer receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $770 and $822		57,560			36,309
Other receivables		6,857			8,403
Inventories, net		36,111			33,435
Supplies		11,324			10,717
Deferred income taxes		4,844			4,276
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		3,714			924
Total current assets		161,289			136,756
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, NET		202,724			206,660
OTHER ASSETS:
Goodwill		123,197			123,197
Investment in affiliates		3,399			3,106
Deferred financing costs, net of accumulated amortization of $7,692 and $6,847		4,647			5,458
Deferred income taxes		20,358			26,231
Pension benefit plan asset		27,323			26,887
Other		10			2
TOTAL		$	542,947		$	528,297
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIENCY)
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Accounts payable		$	41,172		$	34,128
Current portion of long-term debt		1,900			1,900
Accrued payroll and compensation		7,915			9,185
Accrued interest payable		7,884			8,824
Accrued and other liabilities		6,877			6,082
Total current liabilities		65,748			60,119
LONG-TERM DEBT, less current portion		486,727			488,575
OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFIT PLAN LIABILITY		21,467			20,665
PENSION BENEFIT PLAN LIABILITY		23,859			24,376
OTHER LIABILITIES		262			404
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIENCY):
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 5,000 shares authorized and unissued Common stock and additional paid in capital, $.01 par value; 45,000 shares authorized, 24,926 shares issued; 24,799 outstanding		52,070			52,070
Treasury stock, 127 shares at cost		(735		)	(735		)
Stock subscriptions receivable		0			(15		)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		(10,410		)	(11,576		)
Retained earnings (deficit)		(96,041		)	(105,586		)
Total stockholders’ equity (deficiency)		(55,116		)	(65,842		)
TOTAL		$	542,947		$	528,297

 

See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements

 

3

 

ACCURIDE CORPORATION

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (LOSS)

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

(UNAUDITED)

 

		Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
		2004			2003			2004			2003
NET SALES		$	120,631		$	94,207		$	232,032		$	182,455
COST OF GOODS SOLD		95,488			75,690			184,925			148,317
GROSS PROFIT		25,143			18,517			47,107			34,138
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Selling, general and administrative		6,418			6,305			12,789			12,194
INCOME FROM OPERATIONS		18,725			12,212			34,318			21,944
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):
Interest income		30			59			55			131
Interest (expense)		(9,063		)	(9,473		)	(18,276		)	(18,385		)
Refinancing costs		0			(11,257		)	0			(11,257		)
Equity in earnings of affiliate		155			199			293			379
Other income (expense), net		(1,676		)	110			(1,537		)	(503		)
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES		8,171			(8,150		)	14,853			(7,691		)
INCOME TAX PROVISION (BENEFIT)		3,393			(2,197		)	5,308			(1,160		)
NET INCOME (LOSS)		$	4,778		$	(5,953	)	$	9,545		$	(6,531	)

 

See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements

 

4

 

ACCURIDE CORPORATION

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIENCY)

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

(UNAUDITED)

 

 

		Comprehensive Income			Common Stock and Additional Paid in Capital			Treasury Stock			Stock Subscriptions Receivable			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Retained Earnings (Deficit)			Total Stockholders’ Equity (Deficiency)
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2003					$	52,070		$	(735	)	$	(15	)	$	(11,576	)	$	(105,586	)	$	(65,842	)
Net Income		$	9,545														9,545			9,545
Proceeds from stock subscriptions receivable					—			—			15						—			15
Other comprehensive income;
Change in fair market value of cash flow hedges (net of tax)		928												928						928
Minimum pension liability adjustment (net of tax)		238												238						238
Comprehensive income		$	10,711
BALANCE AT JUNE 30, 2004					$	52,070		$	(735	)	$	0		$	(10,410	)	$	(96,041	)	$	(55,116	)

 

See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements

 

5

 

ACCURIDE CORPORATION

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

(UNAUDITED)

 

		Six Months Ended June 30,
		2004			2003
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income (loss)		$	9,545		$	(6,531	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation		13,772			13,875
Amortization-deferred financing costs		896			1,219
Amortization-deferred financing costs related to refinancing		—			2,248
Losses on asset disposition		38			—
Deferred income taxes		4,594			(1,471		)
Equity in earnings of affiliate		(293		)	(379		)
Changes in certain assets and liabilities:
Receivables		(19,296		)	(13,162		)
Inventories and supplies		(3,283		)	(11,301		)
Prepaid expenses and other assets		(1,353		)	2,602
Accounts payable		7,044			4,379
Accrued and other liabilities		(1,273		)	(509		)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		10,391			(9,030		)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchases of property, plant and equipment		(9,858		)	(7,436		)
Capitalized interest		(427		)	(117		)
Cash distribution from affiliate					1,000
Net cash used in investing activities		(10,285		)	(6,553		)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Net decrease in revolving credit advance		—			(35,000		)
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt		—			180,000
Payments on long-term debt		(1,900		)	(128,785		)
Deferred financing fees		(34		)	(1,957		)
Proceeds from stock subscriptions receivable		15			75
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(1,919		)	14,333
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(1,813		)	(1,250		)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		42,692			41,266
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period		$	40,879		$	40,016

 

See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements

 

6

 

ACCURIDE CORPORATION

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)

AS OF JUNE 30, 2004 AND DECEMBER 31, 2003 AND FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED              JUNE 30, 2004 AND 2003

 

Note 1 – Basis of Presentation – The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, except that the unaudited consolidated financial statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements.  However, in the opinion of Accuride Corporation (“Accuride” or the “Company”), all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary to present fairly the consolidated financial statements have been included.

 

The results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2004 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the year ending December 31, 2004.  The unaudited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto disclosed in Accuride’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.

 

Management’s Estimates and Assumptions - The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.

 

Note 2 – Accounting Changes

 

FAS 106-2—In December 2003, the President of the United States signed the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act into law.  The Act introduces a prescription drug benefit under Medicare (Medicare Part D) as well as a federal subsidy to sponsors of retiree health care benefit plans that provide a benefit that is at least actuarially equivalent to Medicare Part D.  FASB Statement No. 106, Employers’ Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions, requires presently enacted changes in relevant laws to be considered in current period measurements of postretirement benefit costs and the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation.  In May 2004, the FASB issued Staff Position No. FAS 106-2, “Accounting and Disclosure Requirements related to the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003” which provides authoritative guidance on accounting for the effects of the new Medicare prescription drug legislation.  This FSP is effective for the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2004.  Management is still evaluating what effect this law and pronouncement will have on the Company’s financial position and results of operations.

 

FIN 46—In December 2003, the FASB issued a revision to Interpretation 46 (FIN 46R) to clarify some of the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities. The term “variable interest” is defined in FIN 46 as “contractual, ownership or other pecuniary interest in an entity that change with changes in the entity’s net asset value.”  Variable interests are investments or other interests that will absorb a portion of an entity’s expected losses if they occur or receive portions of the entity’s expected residual returns if they occur.  The application of FIN 46R did not have an impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

 

SFAS No. 132 (Revised 2003)—In December 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 132 (Revised 2003), Employers’ Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits-an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, and 106. This Statement revises employers’ disclosures about pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans. It requires additional disclosures to those in the original Statement 132 about the assets, obligations, cash flows, and net periodic benefit cost of defined benefit pension plans

 

7

 

and other defined benefit postretirement plans. SFAS 132 (Revised  2003) was effective for financial statements with fiscal years ending after December 15, 2003. The Company adopted this statement as of December 31, 2003 and revised its annual and interim disclosures for the periods ended December 31, 2003 and June 30, 2004, accordingly.

 

SFAS 148—On December 31, 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation-Transition and Disclosure”.  This statement amends SFAS Statement No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” and provides alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based methods of accounting for stock-based employee compensation.  In addition, this statement amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS 123 to require prominent disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements about the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method used on reported results.

 

The Company applies APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations in accounting for our 1998 Stock Purchase and Option Plan; accordingly, since the grant price of the stock options was at least 100% of the fair value at the date of the grant, no compensation expense has been recognized by the Company in connection with the option grants.  Had compensation cost for this plan been determined based on the fair value at the grant dates for awards under the plan consistent with the fair value method of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, as amended by SFAS No. 148, the effect on the Company’s net income (loss) would have been the following:

 

		For the Three Months Ended June 30						For the Six Months Ended June 30
		2004			2003			2004			2003
Net income (loss) as reported		$	4,778		$	(5,953	)	$	9,545		$	(6,531	)
Add:  Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under the intrinsic value based method, net of related tax effects
Deduct:  Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under the fair value based method, net of related tax effects		(21		)	(20		)	(43		)	(39		)
Pro forma net income (loss)		$	4,757		$	(5,973	)	$	9,502		$	(6,570	)

 

Note 3 – Inventories – Inventories were as follows:

 

		June 30, 2004			December 31, 2003
Raw Materials		$	5,744		$	4,119
Work in Process		12,665			13,354
Finished Manufactured Goods		15,189			14,520
LIFO Adjustment		2,513			1,442
Inventories, net		$	36,111		$	33,435

 

Note 4 – Accounting for Derivatives and Hedging Activities – The Company uses derivative financial instruments as part of its overall risk management strategy as further described under Item 7A of the 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K.  The derivative instruments used by the Company from time to time include interest rate, foreign exchange, and commodity price instruments.  All derivative instruments designated as hedges are recognized on the balance sheet at their estimated fair value.

 

8

 

Foreign Exchange Instruments – During the quarter ended June 30, 2004, the Company used foreign currency collar option contracts and forward contracts to limit foreign exchange risk on anticipated but not yet committed transactions expected to be denominated in Canadian dollars.  These contracts were designated as cash flow hedges and management expects that these derivative instruments will be highly effective.

 

The Company used the intrinsic value method to account for the Canadian dollar collar option contracts. Any unrealized change in the intrinsic value of these options was recorded in Other Comprehensive Income (See Note 6) and the realized gains or losses were reflected in current period earnings as Cost of Goods Sold.  Both the realized and unrealized gains and losses related to the time value of the options were recorded in Other Income (Expense).  Included in Other Income (Expense) for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2004 is $1,400 and $1,400, respectively, representing realized losses related to the time value of terminated option contracts.  There were no outstanding Canadian dollar collar option contracts as of June 30, 2004.

 

The Company entered into Canadian dollar forward contracts during the quarter ended June 30, 2004 and is following the guidance under Derivative Implementation Group (“DIG”) item G20 to account for these contracts.  As these contracts have been designated as cash flow hedges, unrealized gains or losses will be deferred in Other Comprehensive Income (See Note 8) with only realized gains or losses reflected in current period earnings as Cost of Goods Sold.  However, to the extent that any of these contracts are not completely effective in offsetting the change in the value of the anticipated transactions being hedged, any changes in fair value relating to the ineffective portion of these contracts will be immediately recognized in Cost of Goods Sold.  At June 30, 2004, Accuride had open foreign exchange forward contracts of $35.9 million.

 

Note 5 – Supplemental Cash Flow Disclosure – During the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, Accuride paid $18,856 and $19,322 for interest, respectively.  During these same time periods, Accuride paid $2,031 and received net refunds of $7,344 for income taxes, respectively.

 

Note 6 – Comprehensive income is summarized as follows:

 

		For the Three Months Ended June 30						For the Six Months Ended June 30
		2004			2003			2004			2003
Net income (loss)		$	4,778		$	(5,953	)	$	9,545		$	(6,531	)
Other comprehensive income
Unrealized gain on foreign currency hedges (net of tax)		767			342			928			1,240
Minimum pension liability adjustment (net of tax)		141						238
Total comprehensive income (loss)		$	5,686		$	(5,611	)	$	10,711		$	(5,291	)

 

Included in other comprehensive income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, respectively, is $767 and $928 (net of tax) of unrealized gains on derivatives that have been designated as cash flow hedges in accordance with SFAS 133, as further described in Note 3.  The $928 of unrealized gains remaining in other comprehensive income related to derivative instruments will be reclassified into earnings as realized during the next six months.  Also included in other comprehensive income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, respectively, is $141 and $238 (net of tax) of minimum pension liability adjustments related to fluctuations of the Canadian dollar and translation of our Canadian pension plans.

 

9

 

Note 7 – Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans

 

Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost for the three and six months ended June 30:

 

		Pension Benefits						Other Benefits						Pension Benefits						Other Benefits
		Three Months Ended June 30,												Six Months Ended June 30,
		2004			2003			2004			2003			2004			2003			2004			2003
Service cost-benefits earned during the year		$	670		$	577		$	222		$	194		$	1,340		$	1,154		$	444		$	388
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation		1,048			963			362			354			2,096			1,926			724			708
Expected return on plan assets		(1,417		)	(1,247		)	0			0			(2,834		)	(2,494		)	0			0
Prior service cost and other amortization (net)		404			343			(11		)	(6		)	808			686			(22		)	(12		)
Net periodic benefit cost		$	705		$	636		$	573		$	542		$	1,410		$	1,272		$	1,146		$	1,084

 

Employer Contributions- For the six months ended June 30, 2004, $2,656 has been contributed to company sponsored pension plans.  The Company presently anticipates contributing an additional $2,447 to fund its pension plans in 2004 for a total of $5,103.

 

Note 8 – Contingencies

 

The Company is from time to time involved in various legal proceedings of a character normally incident to its business. Management does not believe that the outcome of these proceedings will have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial condition or results of operations of the Company.

 

The Company’s operations are subject to federal, state and local environmental laws, rules and regulations. Pursuant to the Recapitalization of the Company on January 21, 1998, the Company was indemnified by PDC with respect to certain environmental liabilities at its Henderson and London facilities, subject to certain limitations. Pursuant to the AKW acquisition agreement on April 1, 1999, in which Accuride purchased Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Corporation’s (“Kaiser”) 50% interest in AKW, the Company has been indemnified by Kaiser with respect to certain environmental liabilities relating to the facilities leased by AKW (the “Erie Lease”). On February 12, 2002, Kaiser filed a voluntary petition in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code, which could limit our ability to pursue indemnification claims, if necessary, from Kaiser.  Management does not believe that the outcome of any environmental proceedings will have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial condition or results of operations of the Company.

 

10

 

Item 2.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

 

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes included in Item 1 of Part 1 of this report on Form 10-Q.  Except for the historical information contained herein, this report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties.  Our actual results may differ materially from those indicated by such forward-looking statements.

 

Overview

The commercial vehicle market continues to gain strength.  Freight growth, improved fleet profitability, equipment age, equipment utilization, and continued economic strength are driving order rates for new vehicles to levels not seen in years.  Current industry forecasts by analysts, including America’s Commercial Transportation (“ACT”) Publications, predict that the North American truck industry will continue to gain momentum in 2004.

 

Our quarterly sales for the three months ended June 30, 2004 increased by 28% compared to prior year sales during the comparable period.  This is primarily driven by an increase in Class 5-8 builds of 34.4% from the year ago level.  Net orders for Class 5-8 for the second quarter of 2004 were 86.8% higher than last year and outpaced builds for the current quarter.

 

Our operating challenges are to meet these higher levels of production and combat rising raw material costs.  In order to help mitigate these rising raw material costs, we began to pass these costs through to our customers in the form of price increases during the second quarter of 2004.

 

Results of Operations

 

Three Months Ended June 30, 2004 Compared to the Three Months Ended June 30, 2003.

 

The following table sets forth certain income statement information of Accuride for the three months ended June 30, 2004 and June 30, 2003

 

		June 30, 2004					June 30, 2003
		(dollars in thousands)
Net sales		$	120,631		100.0	%	$	94,207		100.0	%
Gross profit		25,143			20.8	%	18,517			19.7	%
Operating expenses		6,418			5.3	%	6,305			6.7	%
Income from operations		18,725			15.5	%	12,212			13.0	%
Equity in earnings of affiliate		155			0.1	%	199			0.2	%
Other income (expense), net		(10,709		)	(8.9	)%	(20,561		)	(21.8	)%
Net income (loss)		4,778			4.0	%	(5,953		)	(6.3%	)

 

Net Sales.  Net sales for the three months ended June 30, 2004 were $120.6 million, an increase of 28.0% compared to net sales of $94.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003.  Approximately $21 million of the increase in net sales is a result of the continuing cyclical recovery in the commercial vehicle industry and an increase in the sales volume of aluminum wheels.  We believe the increase in the sales volume of aluminum wheels is due to increased industry usage of aluminum versus steel wheels.  In addition, price increases in the amount of $3.7 million were implemented in the second quarter of 2004 to mitigate the rising costs of raw materials.

 

Gross Profit.  Gross profit increased $6.6 million, or 35.7%, to $25.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004 from $18.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003.  The increase is primarily attributable to the increase in sales volume, an impact of $8.5 million, and the pricing increases as

 

11

 

discussed above in the amount of $3.7 million.  These increases were partially offset by higher steel and aluminum costs in the amount of $4.3 million and the negative effects of the strengthening Canadian dollar.  Gross profit for the second quarter of 2004 as a percent of sales was 20.8%, compared to 19.7% in 2003.

 

Operating Expenses.  Operating expenses remained relatively flat, increasing $0.1 million or 1.6%, to $6.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004 from $6.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003.  As a percent of sales, operating expenses for the second quarter of 2004 have decreased to 5.3% compared to 6.7% for the second quarter of 2003.

 

Other Income (Expense).  Other expense decreased $9.9 million to $10.7 million for the three-month period ended June 30, 2004 from $20.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003.  Included in the 2003 expense is $11.3 million associated with the refinancing of our term debt.  During the second quarter of 2004, a $1.4 million loss was realized on our Canadian dollar collar option contracts with no comparable loss in 2003.

 

Net Income (Loss).  We had net income of $4.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004 compared to net loss of $6.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003.  Included in the 2003 net loss of $6.0 million is $11.3 million of expense associated with the refinancing of our term debt.  For the three months ended June 30, 2004, we had income tax expense of $3.4 million compared to an income tax benefit of $2.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003.  Our effective tax rate in both periods differs from the statutory rate of 35% primarily as a result of taxes in foreign jurisdictions.

 

Six Months Ended June 30, 2004 Compared to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2003.

 

The following table sets forth certain income statement information of Accuride for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and June 30, 2003

 

		June 30, 2004					June 30, 2003
		(dollars in thousands)
Net sales		$	232,032		100.0	%	$	182,455		100.0	%
Gross profit		47,107			20.3	%	34,138			18.7	%
Operating expenses		12,789			5.5	%	12,194			6.7	%
Income from operations		34,318			14.8	%	21,944			12.0	%
Equity in earnings of affiliate		293			0.1	%	379			0.2	%
Other income (expense), net		(19,758		)	(8.5	)%	(30,014		)	(16.5%	)%
Net income (loss)		9,545			4.1	%	(6,531		)	(3.6	)%

 

Net Sales.  Net sales for the six months ended June 30, 2004 were $232.0 million, an increase of 27.1% compared to net sales of $182.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003.  Approximately $41 million of the increase in net sales is a result of the continuing cyclical recovery in the commercial vehicle industry and an increase in the sales volume of aluminum wheels.  We believe the increase in the sales volume of aluminum wheels is due to increased industry usage of aluminum versus steel wheels.  In addition, price increases in the amount of $3.7 million were implemented in the second quarter of 2004 to mitigate the rising costs of raw materials.

 

Gross Profit.  Gross profit increased $13.0 million, or 38.1%, to $47.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004 from $34.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003.  The increase is primarily attributable to the increase in sales volume, an impact of $16.3 million, and the pricing increases as discussed above in the amount of $3.7 million.  These increases were partially offset by higher steel and aluminum costs in the amount of $4.8 million and the negative effects of the strengthening Canadian dollar.  Gross profit for the second quarter of 2004 as a percent of sales was 20.3%, compared to 18.7% in 2003.

 

12

 

Operating Expenses.  Operating expenses increased $0.6 million, or 4.9% to $12.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004 from $12.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003 primarily due to an increase in research and development expense.  As a percent of sales, operating expenses for the first half of 2004 have decreased to 5.5% compared to 6.7% for the first half of 2003.

 

Other Income (Expense).  Other expense decreased $10.2 million to $19.8 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2004 from $30.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003.  Included in the 2003 expense is $11.3 million associated with the refinancing of our term debt.  During 2004, a $1.4 million loss was realized on our Canadian dollar collar option contracts with no comparable loss in 2003.

 

Net Income (Loss).  We had net income of $9.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004 compared to net loss of $6.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003.  Included in the 2003 net loss of $6.5 million is $11.3 million of expense associated with the refinancing of our term debt.  For the six months ended June 30, 2004, we had income tax expense of $5.3 million compared to an income tax benefit of $1.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003.  Our income tax benefit of 15% of pre-tax loss in 2003 is lower than the statutory rate of 35% primarily as a result of taxes in foreign jurisdictions.

 

Changes in Financial Condition

 

Total assets increased from $528.3 million at December 31, 2003 to $542.9 million at June 30, 2004 for a $14.6 million, or 2.8% increase in total assets during the six months ended June 30, 2004.

 

Net working capital, defined as current assets less current liabilities, increased $18.9 million from December 31, 2003 to June 30, 2004.

 

Significant changes in net working capital from December 31, 2003 were as follows:

•                  An increase in net receivables of $19.7 million.  The majority of this increase relates to stronger sales volumes in 2004.

•                  An increase in net inventories of $2.7 million.  The majority of this increase is the result of a slight inventory build in June 2004 in anticipation of regularly scheduled shutdowns for maintenance at our facilities in London, Ontario, Canada; Henderson, Kentucky; and Erie, Pennsylvania, in July 2004.

•                  An increase in prepaid expenses and other current assets of $2.8 million.  Over half of this increase relates to an increase in the fair market value of our foreign exchange cash flow hedges and the remainder relates to the timing of insurance payments.

•                  An increase in accounts payable of $7.0 million.  The majority of this increase relates to stronger production volumes in 2004.  The increase is partially offset by lower capital spending at the end of the second quarter of 2004 than at the end of 2003.

 

A decrease in non-current deferred income taxes of $5.9 million, or 22.4%, from $26.2 million on December 31, 2003, to $20.4 million on June 30, 2004, is related to the use of prior years’ net operating losses.

 

Property plant and equipment decreased $4.0 million, or 1.9%, from $206.7 million on December 31, 2003, to $202.7 million on June 30, 2004 primarily due to capital spending of approximately $9.9 million during the first six months of 2004, offset by normal depreciation expense of $12.4 million and accelerated depreciation expense at our Erie, Pennsylvania and Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio facilities to adjust equipment to fair market value in the amount of $0.8 million and $0.6 million, respectively.

 

Long-term debt decreased $1.9 million from $488.6 million on December 31, 2003 to $486.7 million on June 30, 2004 primarily due to a $1.0 million payment on the Term C loan and a $0.9 million payment on the New Term B loan during the first half of 2004 (See “Financing Activities, Bank Borrowings” in “Capital Resources and Liquidity,” below).

 

13

 

Capital Resources and Liquidity

 

Our primary sources of liquidity during the first half of 2004 were cash provided by operating activities and cash reserves.  In addition, the Company has a $66 million revolving credit facility, as defined and discussed below, of which $41 million is currently available.  Primary uses of cash were working capital needs, capital expenditures and debt service.

 

Cash Flow Provided by Operating Activities

 

Net cash provided by operating activities in the first half of 2004 amounted to $10.4 million compared to a net use of cash of $9.0 million for the comparable period in 2003, an increase of $19.4 million.  Net income of $9.5 million for the first half of 2004 compared to a net loss of $6.5 million for the comparable period of 2003 contributed to this increased cash flow.  Included in the 2003 use of cash from operations is $9.0 million of cash fees associated with the refinancing of our term debt.

 

Investing Activities

 

Net cash used in investing activities totaled $10.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004 compared to a use of $6.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003, an increase of $3.7 million.

 

Our most significant cash outlays for investing activities are the purchases of property, plant and equipment.  Our capital expenditures in 2003 were $20.7 million.  We expect our capital expenditures to be approximately $28 million in 2004 of which approximately $10 million has been spent to date.  Included in our anticipated 2004 capital expenditures is approximately $4 million to install manufacturing capacity for the production of light full face design wheels at our facility in London, Ontario, and approximately $8.5 million to install additional machining capacity for aluminum wheels at our facility in Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio.  We anticipate that these expenditures will be funded by cash generated from operations and existing cash reserves.

 

During the first six months of 2003, the Company received a $1.0 million cash distribution from AOT, Inc., our joint venture with Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company.

 

Financing Activities

 

Net cash used in financing activities totaled $1.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004 compared to net cash provided by financing activities of $14.3 million for the comparable period in 2003.

 

During the first half of 2004, we made a $1.0 million payment on the Term C loan and $0.9 million payment on the New Term B loan.

 

Bank Borrowing.  Effective June 13, 2003 we entered into a third amended and restated credit agreement to refinance a portion of the debt outstanding under the July 27, 2001 second amended and restated credit agreement (the “Refinancing”).  The Refinancing, as amended on December 10, 2003, provides for (i) a new term credit facility in an aggregate principal amount of $180 million that matures on June 13, 2007 (“New Term B”), and a revolving credit facility (“New Revolver”) in an aggregate principal amount of $66 million (comprised of a $36 million U.S. revolving credit facility and a $30 million Canadian revolving credit facility) which matures on June 13, 2006 (the New Term B and New Revolver are collectively referred to hereinafter as the “New Senior Facilities”).  The “Term C” facility under the second amended and restated credit agreement remains outstanding under the Refinancing.  As of June 30, 2004, $25 million was outstanding under the New Revolver, $179.1 million was outstanding under The New Term B facility and $95 million was outstanding under the Term C facility.  The New Term B facility requires a $0.9 million repayment on June 13, 2005, and June 13, 2006, and $177.3 million on June 13, 2007.  The Term C facility requires a $1.0 million repayment on January 21, 2005, and $47.0

 

14

 

million repayment on January 21, 2006 and January 21, 2007.  Interest on the term loans and the New Revolver is based on LIBOR plus an applicable margin.  The loans are secured by, among other things, a first priority lien on our properties and assets securing the New Revolver and Term C, a second priority lien on substantially all of our US and Canadian properties and assets to secure the New Term B, and a pledge of 65% of the stock of our Mexican subsidiary.  A negative pledge restricts the imposition of other liens or encumbrances on any of the assets, subject to certain exceptions.

 

Restrictive Debt Covenants.  Our credit documents contain numerous financial and operating covenants that limit the discretion of management with respect to certain business matters. These covenants place significant restrictions on, among other things, the ability to incur additional debt, to pay dividends, to create liens, to make certain payments and investments and to sell or otherwise dispose of assets and merge or consolidate with other entities. We are also required to meet certain financial ratios and tests including a leverage ratio, an interest coverage ratio, and a fixed charge coverage ratio. A failure to comply with the obligations contained in the credit documents could result in an event of default, and possibly the acceleration of the related debt and the acceleration of debt under other instruments evidencing indebtedness that may contain cross-acceleration or cross-default provisions. As of June 30, 2004, and currently, we are in compliance with our financial covenants and ratios.

 

Senior Subordinated Notes.              In January 1998 we issued $200 million of senior subordinated notes (the “Notes”) pursuant to an indenture (the “Indenture”).  The Indenture is limited in aggregate principal amount to $300 million, of which $200 million were issued as private notes and subsequently exchanged for exchange notes, which exchange has been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The Indenture provides certain restrictions on the payment of dividends by Accuride.  The Indenture is subject to and governed by the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, as amended.  The Notes are general unsecured obligations of Accuride and are subordinated in right of payment to all existing and future Senior Indebtedness (as defined in the Indenture).  The Notes mature on February 1, 2008.  Interest on the Notes accrues at the rate of 9.25% per annum and is due and payable semi-annually in arrears on February 1 and August 1, to holders of record of the Notes on the immediately preceding January 15 and July 15.  As of June 30, 2004 the aggregate principal amount of Notes outstanding was $189.9 million.

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements.  We do not currently have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a material current or future effect on our financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.  From time to time we may enter into operating leases, letters of credit, or take-or-pay obligations related to the purchase of certain raw materials that would not be reflected in our balance sheet.

 

We believe that cash from operations, existing cash reserves, and availability under the New Revolver will provide adequate funds for our working capital needs, planned capital expenditures and debt service obligations for the next twelve months.  Our ability to fund working capital needs, planned capital expenditures, scheduled debt payments, and to comply with all of the financial covenants under our credit agreement, depends on our future operating performance and cash flow, which in turn, are subject to prevailing economic conditions and to financial, business and other factors, some of which are beyond our control.

 

Accounting Changes.  During the quarter ended June 30, 2004, we had no accounting policy changes which had a material effect on our financial results.  See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of accounting changes.

 

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates.  We have made a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of results of operations and financial position in the preparation of our financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.  Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates under different assumptions and conditions.  We included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 a discussion of

 

15

 

our most critical accounting policies, which are those that have a material impact on our financial condition or operating performance and require management’s most difficult, subjective and complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain.

 

We have not made changes in any critical accounting policies during the second quarter of 2004.  Any changes in critical accounting policies and estimates are discussed with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company during the quarter in which a change is made.

 

Factors Affecting Future Results

 

In this report, we have made various statements regarding current expectations or forecasts of future events, which speak only as of the date the statements are made.  These statements are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of that term in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.  Forward-looking statements are also made from time-to-time in press releases and in oral statements made by the officers of Accuride.  Forward-looking statements are identified by the words “estimate,” “project,” “anticipate,” “will continue,” “will likely result,” “expect,” “intend,” “believe,” “plan,” “predict” and similar expressions.  Forward looking statements also include, but are not limited to, statements regarding market recovery, projections of revenue, income, loss, or working capital, capital expenditure levels, plans for future operations, financing needs, the ultimate outcome and impact of any litigation against Accuride, the sufficiency of our capital resources and plans and assumptions relating to the foregoing.

 

Such forward-looking statements are based on assumptions and estimates, which although believed to be reasonable, may turn out to be incorrect.  Therefore, undue reliance should not be placed upon these estimates and statements.  We cannot assure that any of these statements, estimates, or beliefs will be realized and actual results may differ from those contemplated in these “forward-looking statements.”  We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.  You are advised to consult further disclosures we may make on related subjects in our filings with the SEC.  In addition to other factors discussed in this report, some of the important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements include the following:

 

•                  our significant indebtedness may have important consequences, including, but not limited to, impairment of our ability to obtain additional financing, reduction of funds available for operations and business opportunities or limitations on our ability to dispose of assets;

•                  our credit documents contain significant financial and operating covenants that limit the discretion of management with respect to certain business matters.  We must also meet certain financial ratios and tests as described above.  Failure to comply with the obligations contained in the debt agreements could result in an event of default, and possibly the acceleration of the related debt and the acceleration of debt under other instruments evidencing debt that may contain cross-acceleration or cross-default provisions;

•                  we use a substantial amount of raw steel and aluminum and are vulnerable to significant price increases and/or surcharges;

•                  the recovery of the Heavy/Medium truck industry may not be as robust as anticipated and the pace of the general economic recovery may lag expectations;

•                  significant volatility in the foreign currency markets could have an adverse effect on us;

•                  a labor strike may disrupt our supply to our customer base;

•                  our ability to service our indebtedness is dependent upon operating cash flow;

•                  the loss of a major customer could have a material adverse effect on our business;

•                  the demands of original equipment manufacturers for price reductions may adversely affect profitability;

 

16

 

•                  an interruption in supply of steel or aluminum could reduce our ability to obtain favorable sourcing of such raw materials;

•                  we may encounter increased competition in the future from existing competitors or new competitors;

•                  we may be subject to liability under certain environmental laws and the cost of compliance with these regulations could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and may adversely affect our ability to sell or rent such property or to borrow using such property as collateral;

•                  the interests of our principal stockholder may conflict with the interests of the holders of our securities; and

•                  our success depends largely upon the abilities and experience of certain key management personnel.  The loss of the services of one or more of these key personnel could have a negative impact on our business.

 

For further information, refer to the business description and additional risk factors sections included in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the SEC.

 

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

 

In the normal course of doing business, we are exposed to the risks associated with changes in foreign exchange rates, raw material/commodity prices, and interest rates.  We use derivative instruments to manage these exposures. The objectives for holding derivatives are to minimize the risks using the most effective methods to eliminate or reduce the impacts of these exposures.

 

Foreign Currency Risk

Certain forecasted transactions, assets, and liabilities are exposed to foreign currency risk.  We monitor our foreign currency exposures to maximize the overall effectiveness of our foreign currency derivatives. The principal currency of exposure is the Canadian dollar. Forward foreign exchange contracts, designated as hedging instruments under SFAS 133, are used to offset the impact of the variability in exchange rates on our operations, cash flows, assets and liabilities. At June 30, 2004, we had open foreign exchange forward contracts of $35.9 million.  These foreign exchange forward contracts will mature during the next six months. Management believes the use of foreign currency financial instruments reduces the risks that arise from doing business in international markets.

 

However, our foreign currency derivative contracts provide only limited protection against currency risks.  Factors that could impact the effectiveness of our currency risk management programs include accuracy of sales estimates, volatility of currency markets and the cost and availability of derivative instruments.  The counterparties to the foreign exchange contracts are financial institutions with investment grade credit ratings.  The use of option contracts protects our cash flows against unfavorable movements in exchange rates, to the extent of the amount under contract.

 

A 10% adverse change in currency exchange rates for the foreign currency collar options held at June 30, 2004, would have a negative impact of approximately $3.6 million on the fair value of such instruments.  This quantification of exposure to the market risk associated with foreign exchange financial instruments does not take into account the offsetting impact of changes in the fair value of our foreign denominated assets, liabilities and firm commitments.

 

Raw Material/Commodity Price Risk

We rely upon the supply of certain raw materials and commodities in our production processes and have entered into long-term supply contracts for our steel and aluminum requirements.  The exposures associated with these commitments are primarily managed through the terms of the sales, supply, and procurement contracts.  From time to time, we use commodity price swaps and futures contracts to manage the variability in certain commodity prices. Commodity price swap and futures contracts are used to offset the impact of the variability in certain commodity prices on our operations and cash flows.  At June 30, 2004, we had no open commodity price swaps and futures contracts.

 

17

 

Interest Rate Risk

We use long-term debt as a primary source of capital in our business.  The following table presents the principal cash repayments and related weighted average interest rates by maturity date for our long-term fixed-rate debt and other types of long-term debt at June 30, 2004:

 

 

(Dollars in Thousands)		2004		2005			2006			2007			2008			Thereafter		Total			Fair Value
Long-term Debt:
Fixed													$	189,900				$	189,900		$	193,698
Avg. Rate													9.25		%			9.25		%
Variable				$	1,900		$	72,900		$	224,300							$	299,100		$	304,195
Avg. Rate				5.60		%	4.93		%	6.26		%						5.93		%

 

We are exposed to the variability of interest rates on our variable rate debt.  However, of the total variable rate debt of $299.1 million outstanding as of June 30, 2004, an amount of $179.1 million representing the New Term B loan and an amount of $25.0 million representing the amount outstanding under the New Revolver are fixed at interest rates of 6.7% and 5.4%, respectively, through December 2004.

 

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

 

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report.  Based on this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures, which are designed to ensure that information required to be included in our periodic SEC reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures, are effective.

 

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

During the quarter ended June 30, 2004, there was no change in our internal controls over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

18

 

PART II.
OTHER INFORMATION

 

Item 1.  Legal Proceedings

 

Neither Accuride nor any of its subsidiaries is a party to any material legal proceeding.  However, Accuride from time-to-time is involved in ordinary routine litigation incidental to its business.

 

Item 2.  Changes in Securities, Use of Proceeds and Issuer Purchase of Equity Securities

 

During the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2004, Accuride issued no common stock or options.

 

Item 6.  Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

 

(a)		Exhibit No.		Description
		31.1		Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley  Act of 2002 and Rule 13a-14 of the Exchange Act of Terrence J. Keating.
		31.2		Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley  Act of 2002 and Rule 13a-14 of the Exchange Act of John R. Murphy.
		32.1		Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.
(b)		Reports on Form 8-K:
		Form 8-K containing our first quarter results for 2004 was furnished to the SEC on May 12, 2004.

 

19

 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

ACCURIDE CORPORATION
/s/ Terrence J. Keating		Dated:	August 13, 2004
Terrence J. Keating
President and Chief Executive Officer
/s/ John R. Murphy		Dated:	August 13, 2004
John R. Murphy
Executive Vice President – Finance and Chief Financial Officer
Principal Accounting Officer

 

20