UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark one) |
|
ý Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
|
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 |
|
OR |
|
o Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
|
Commission File Number: 0-31151 |
RADVIEW SOFTWARE LTD
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Israel |
|
Not applicable |
(State or other jurisdiction of |
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
7 New England Executive Park
Burlington, MA 01803
(Address of principal executive offices)
Telephone Number (781) 238-1111
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
None
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) Yes ý No o, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days: Yes ý No o.
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in
Rule 126-2 of the Exchange Act):
Yes o No.
ý.
As of July 31, 2004, there were 20,503,740 shares of the Registrants Ordinary Shares outstanding, excluding 134,000 Ordinary Shares held by the registrant as treasury shares that are dormant shares for purposes of Israeli law.
RADVIEW SOFTWARE LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Form 10-Q INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1. |
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements: |
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certifications |
|
2
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
RADVIEW SOFTWARE LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
3,079 |
|
$ |
3,075 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of reserves of $96 at June 30, 2004 and $72 at December 31, 2003 |
|
614 |
|
678 |
|
||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
361 |
|
426 |
|
||
Total Current Assets |
|
4,054 |
|
4,179 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Property and Equipment, net |
|
217 |
|
333 |
|
||
Other Assets |
|
646 |
|
643 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total Assets |
|
$ |
4,917 |
|
$ |
5,155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
339 |
|
$ |
367 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
944 |
|
989 |
|
||
Accrued restructuring charge, current portion |
|
178 |
|
225 |
|
||
Deferred revenue |
|
1,259 |
|
1,064 |
|
||
Total Current Liabilities |
|
2,720 |
|
2,645 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Long-term Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Accrued restructuring charge, less current portion |
|
|
|
95 |
|
||
Accrued severance |
|
644 |
|
619 |
|
||
Total Long-Term Liabilities |
|
644 |
|
714 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total Liabilities |
|
3,364 |
|
3,359 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Shareholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Ordinary shares, NIS 0.01 par value |
|
51 |
|
43 |
|
||
Treasury shares, at cost 134,000 shares |
|
(100 |
) |
(100 |
) |
||
Additional paid-in capital |
|
56,816 |
|
55,010 |
|
||
Deferred compensation |
|
|
|
(89 |
) |
||
Accumulated deficit |
|
(55,214 |
) |
(53,068 |
) |
||
Total Shareholders Equity |
|
1,553 |
|
1,796 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
$ |
4,917 |
|
$ |
5,155 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
RADVIEW SOFTWARE LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three
Months Ended |
|
Six Months
Ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||||
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Software licenses |
|
$ |
523 |
|
$ |
622 |
|
$ |
970 |
|
$ |
1,289 |
|
Services |
|
545 |
|
589 |
|
1,078 |
|
1,142 |
|
||||
Total Revenues |
|
1,068 |
|
1,211 |
|
2,048 |
|
2,431 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Cost of Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Software licenses |
|
18 |
|
15 |
|
49 |
|
35 |
|
||||
Services |
|
77 |
|
111 |
|
157 |
|
230 |
|
||||
Total Cost of Revenues |
|
95 |
|
126 |
|
206 |
|
265 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Gross Profit |
|
973 |
|
1,085 |
|
1,842 |
|
2,166 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Operating Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Sales and marketing |
|
897 |
|
1,040 |
|
1,702 |
|
2,270 |
|
||||
Research and development |
|
636 |
|
650 |
|
1,268 |
|
1,500 |
|
||||
General and administrative |
|
417 |
|
406 |
|
919 |
|
843 |
|
||||
Stock-based compensation (1) |
|
|
|
103 |
|
84 |
|
214 |
|
||||
Restructuring charges (Note 4) |
|
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
245 |
|
||||
Total Operating Expenses |
|
1,950 |
|
2,444 |
|
3,973 |
|
5,072 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Operating loss |
|
(977 |
) |
(1,359 |
) |
(2,131 |
) |
(2,906 |
) |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Interest income, net |
|
3 |
|
10 |
|
6 |
|
24 |
|
||||
Other expense, net |
|
(21 |
) |
(46 |
) |
(21 |
) |
(54 |
) |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net loss |
|
$ |
(995 |
) |
$ |
(1,395 |
) |
$ |
(2,146 |
) |
$ |
(2,936 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Basic and diluted net loss per share |
|
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
$ |
(0.08 |
) |
$ |
(0.11 |
) |
$ |
(0.18 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Weighted average number of shares used in computing basic and diluted net loss per share |
|
20,456 |
|
16,478 |
|
19,126 |
|
16,474 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) The following summarizes the departmental allocation of the stock-based compensation charge: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Sales and marketing |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
28 |
|
$ |
44 |
|
$ |
67 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
|
36 |
|
37 |
|
80 |
|
||||
General and administrative |
|
|
|
39 |
|
3 |
|
67 |
|
||||
Total stock-based compensation |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
103 |
|
$ |
84 |
|
$ |
214 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
RADVIEW SOFTWARE LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
Six Months
Ended |
|
||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net loss |
|
$ |
(2,146 |
) |
$ |
(2,936 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities- |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Depreciation |
|
136 |
|
372 |
|
||
Amortization of deferred compensation |
|
84 |
|
214 |
|
||
Accrued severance pay |
|
25 |
|
(202 |
) |
||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities- |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Accounts receivable, net |
|
64 |
|
140 |
|
||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
65 |
|
122 |
|
||
Accounts payable |
|
(28 |
) |
37 |
|
||
Accrued expenses |
|
(45 |
) |
(431 |
) |
||
Accrued restructuring charge |
|
(142 |
) |
(12 |
) |
||
Deferred revenue |
|
195 |
|
122 |
|
||
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
(1,792 |
) |
(2,574 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
(20 |
) |
(81 |
) |
||
Decrease (increase) in other assets |
|
(3 |
) |
97 |
|
||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
(23 |
) |
16 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Proceeds from private placement of ordinary shares, net |
|
1,792 |
|
|
|
||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
27 |
|
4 |
|
||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
1,819 |
|
4 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
4 |
|
(2,554 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
3,075 |
|
7,566 |
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
3,079 |
|
$ |
5,012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash paid during period for interest |
|
$ |
4 |
|
$ |
8 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
RADVIEW SOFTWARE LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
1. Operations
RadView Software Ltd. (the Company) is an Israeli corporation. The Company develops, markets and supports software that enables organizations to verify the scalability, efficiency and reliability of web applications, and facilitates their rapid development.
The Company has a history of incurring net losses and had an accumulated deficit of approximately $55.2 million at June 30, 2004. The Company has funded these losses principally from proceeds from equity financing, including the private placement of its ordinary shares completed in March 2004 (see Note 4). In each of 2001, 2002 and 2003, the Company restructured its business to reduce total operating expenses by more than 60% through reductions in workforce and the termination of certain leases.
In July 2004, the Company completed a $1,000,000 technology license transaction with a distribution partner (see Note 7). Management believes that existing cash and cash equivalents, along with the proceeds from this technology license transaction, will be adequate to fund operations at least through June 30, 2005.
2. Significant Accounting Policies
The Companys condensed consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information. The significant policies followed in the preparation of the condensed consolidated financial statements, applied on a consistent basis, are as follows.
(a) Use of Estimates
The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
(b) Financial Statements in U.S. Dollars
The consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in U.S. dollars because the currency of the primary economic environment in which the operations of the Company are conducted is the U.S. dollar. Substantially all of the Companys sales are in U.S. dollars. Most purchases of materials, components and most marketing and management costs are denominated in U.S. dollars. Therefore, the functional currency of the Company is the U.S. dollar.
Transactions and balances denominated in U.S. dollars are presented at their original amounts. Transactions and balances in other currencies are translated into U.S. dollars in accordance with the principles set forth in the Financial Accounting Standards Board of the United States (FASB) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 52, Foreign Currency Translation. Accordingly, items have been translated as follows:
Monetary Items At the exchange rate in effect on the balance sheet date.
Nonmonetary Items At historical exchange rates.
Revenue and Expense Items At the exchange rates in effect as of the date of recognition of those items (excluding depreciation and other items deriving from nonmonetary items).
All exchange gains and losses from the above-mentioned translation (which were immaterial for all periods presented) are reflected in the statements of operations. The representative rate of exchange was U.S. $1.00 to 4.497 New Israeli Shekel (NIS) at June 30, 2004, U.S. $1.00 to NIS 4.379 at December 31, 2003, and U.S. $1.00 to NIS 4.312 at June 30, 2003.
6
(c) Interim Financial Statements
The accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2004, the condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, and the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, are unaudited but, in the opinion of management, include all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of results for these interim periods. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States have been omitted, although the Company believes that the disclosures included are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. The results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire fiscal year. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the annual consolidated financial statements for 2003 and related notes included in the Companys Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 29, 2004.
(d) Research and Development Cost
The Company has evaluated the establishment of technological feasibility of its products in accordance with SFAS No. 86, Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software to Be Sold, Leased or Otherwise Marketed. The Company sells products in a market that is subject to rapid technological change, new product development and changing customer needs. Accordingly, the Company has concluded that technological feasibility is not established until the development stage of the product is nearly complete. The Company defines technological feasibility as the completion of a working model. The time period during which costs could be capitalized from the point of reaching technological feasibility until the time of general product release is very short. Consequently, the amounts that could be capitalized are not material to the Companys financial position or results of operations. Therefore, the Company has charged all such costs to research and development expense in the period incurred.
(e) Revenue Recognition
The Company generates revenues mainly from licensing the rights to use its software products. The Company also generates revenues from support and maintenance services and, to a lesser extent, training and consulting services. The Company sells its products primarily through its direct sales force and, to a lesser extent, through resellers and distributors considered as end-users.
The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with Statement of Position (SOP) 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, and SOP 98-9, Modification of SOP 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, With Respect to Certain Transactions. Under SOP 97-2, revenues from software product licenses are recognized upon delivery of the software provided there is persuasive evidence of an agreement, the fee is fixed or determinable and collection of the related receivable is probable and no further obligations exist. Revenues under multiple-element arrangements, which may include software licenses, support and maintenance, and training and consulting services, are allocated to each element based on their respective fair values, based on vendor-specific objective evidence. This objective evidence represents the price of products and services when sold separately. Revenue is recognized for software licenses sold to resellers or distributors at the time of shipment, provided that all revenue recognition criteria set forth in SOP 97-2 are fulfilled.
SOP 98-9 requires the use of the residual method for recognition of revenues when vendor-specific objective evidence exists for undelivered elements but does not exist for delivered elements of a software arrangement when all other revenue recognition criteria set forth in SOP 97-2 are met. If fair value for a delivered element does not exist but the fair value does exist for all undelivered elements, the Company defers the fair value of the undelivered elements and recognizes the remaining value for the delivered elements.
Revenues from support and maintenance agreements are recognized ratably over the term of the maintenance period, which is typically one year. Revenues from training arrangements are recognized as the services are performed.
7
The Company generally does not grant a right of return to its customers. When a right of return exists, revenue is deferred until the right of return expires, at which time revenue is recognized provided that all other revenue recognition criteria are met.
Amounts collected or billed prior to satisfying the above revenue recognition criteria are reflected as deferred revenue. Deferred revenue primarily represents deferred maintenance revenue, and to a lesser extent, deferred software license revenues.
(f) Employee Stock Options
At June 30, 2004, the Company has three stock option plans. The Company has elected to follow Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Options Issued to Employees and FASB Interpretation (FIN) No. 44 Accounting for Certain Transactions Involving Stock Compensation, in accounting for its employee stock option plans. Under APB No. 25, when the exercise price of an employee stock option is equivalent to or above the market price of the underlying stock on the date of grant, no compensation expense is recognized. The Company adopted the disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure, which amended certain provisions of SFAS No. 123 Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, to provide alternative methods of transition for an entity that voluntarily changes to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation, effective as of the beginning of the fiscal year. The Company continues to apply the provisions of APB No. 25 in accounting for stock-based compensation.
Pro forma information regarding the Companys net loss and net loss per share is required by SFAS No. 123 and has been determined as if the Company had accounted for its employee stock options under the fair value method prescribed by SFAS No. 123. The following table illustrates the effect on net loss and net loss per share if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 to stock-based employee compensation.
|
|
Three
Months Ended |
|
Six Months
Ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||||
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net loss, as reported |
|
$ |
(995 |
) |
$ |
(1,395 |
) |
$ |
(2,146 |
) |
$ |
(2,936 |
) |
Add: Stock-based compensation included in reported net loss |
|
|
|
103 |
|
84 |
|
214 |
|
||||
Deduct: Total stock-based compensation expense determined under fair value based methods |
|
(106 |
) |
(214 |
) |
(248 |
) |
(452 |
) |
||||
Pro forma net loss |
|
$ |
(1,101 |
) |
$ |
(1,506 |
) |
$ |
(2,310 |
) |
$ |
(3,174 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Basic and diluted net loss per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
As reported |
|
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
$ |
(0.08 |
) |
$ |
(0.11 |
) |
$ |
(0.18 |
) |
Pro forma |
|
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
$ |
(0.12 |
) |
$ |
(0.19 |
) |
3. Earnings Per Share
Basic and diluted net loss per share is presented in conformity with SFAS No. 128, Earnings Per Share, for all periods presented. Basic and diluted net loss per ordinary share was determined by dividing net loss attributable to ordinary shareholders by the weighted average ordinary shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per ordinary share is the same as basic net loss per ordinary share for all periods presented, as the effects of the Companys potential additional ordinary shares were antidilutive.
8
The calculation of diluted net loss per share excludes outstanding stock options, warrants and additional investment rights held by certain investors because their inclusion would be antidilutive, as set forth in the following table.
|
|
June 30, |
|
||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options |
|
3,534 |
|
4,365 |
|
Warrants (See Note 4(b)) |
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
Additional investment rights held by certain investors (See Note 4(b)) |
|
3,333 |
|
|
|
4. Shareholders Equity
(a) Private Placement
On March 17, 2004, the Company completed a private placement (the Private Placement) of its ordinary shares, additional investment rights to purchase ordinary shares (Additional Investment Rights) and four series of warrants to purchase ordinary shares (Warrants) pursuant to a securities purchase agreement (the Purchase Agreement) between the Company and certain purchasers named therein (the Purchasers), in reliance on an exemption under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Regulation D promulgated thereunder.
The Company issued 3,333,331 ordinary shares to the Purchasers for a purchase price per share of $0.60, or aggregate gross proceeds of $2.0 million. The Company received net proceeds of $1.8 million from the Private Placement.
In accordance with the Purchase Agreement, the Company was required to register for resale on Form S-3 (the Registration Statement) the ordinary shares issued in the Private Placement and the ordinary shares issuable upon exercise of the Additional Investment Rights and Warrants. The Company filed the Registration Statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 8, 2004 and the Registration Statement was declared effective on June 17, 2004. The Company must maintain the effectiveness of the Registration Statement for a period of up to two years from the effective date of the Registration Statement.
(b) Warrants and Additional Investment Rights
In connection with the Private Placement, the Company issued to the Purchasers Additional Investment Rights to purchase 3,333,331 ordinary shares at an exercise price of $0.810 per share, exercisable from March 11, 2004 until one year after the effective date of the Registration Statement.
In addition, the Company issued to the Purchasers four series of warrants as follows:
Series |
|
Term |
|
Exercise |
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A warrants |
|
Four and a half years |
|
$ |
0.992 |
|
1,000,000 |
|
Series B warrants |
|
Two years |
|
$ |
0.873 |
|
666,668 |
|
Series C warrants |
|
Four and a half years |
|
$ |
0.992 |
|
666,664 |
|
Series D warrants |
|
Two years |
|
$ |
0.873 |
|
666,664 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,999,996 |
|
All of the Warrants are subject to customary anti-dilution adjustments. The Series A and Series B warrants are exercisable beginning September 11, 2004 and for a term as noted in the table above. The Series C and Series D warrants become exercisable only in the event that the Companys ordinary shares are delisted from The Nasdaq
9
SmallCap Market, beginning upon the later of the date of delisting and September 11, 2004, for the term noted in the table above.
On August 2, 2004, the Company received a letter from the Nasdaq informing the Company that it did not comply with Marketplace Rule 4320(e)(2)(B). This rule requires a listed company to meet one of three tests involving shareholders equity, market capitalization or net income. As of June 30, 2004, the Companys shareholders equity was $1,553,000, which was below the minimum shareholders equity requirement of $2.5 million. The Company also does not satisfy either of the other two tests. The Nasdaq also informed the Company that it is reviewing the Companys eligibility for continued listing on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market. In connection with their review, the Nasdaq has requested that the Company provide on or before August 16, 2004 the Companys specific plans to achieve and sustain compliance with the listing requirements. The Company is presently preparing a response to the Nasdaq with the requested information.
The Company may require the Purchasers to exercise their right to purchase ordinary shares pursuant to the Additional Investment Rights or Warrants if the closing price of the ordinary shares on The Nasdaq SmallCap Market or alternative therefor exceeds the respective exercise prices of the Additional Investment Rights or any series of the Warrants by at least 100% for twenty consecutive trading days on which the average daily trading volume of the ordinary shares on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market or alternative therefor is at least 250,000 Ordinary Shares, excluding blocks of 25,000 or more ordinary shares.
5. Accrued Restructuring Charges
The following is a reconciliation of the activity in the accrued restructuring charge for each of the six-month periods ended June 30, 2003 and 2004:
Description |
|
Balance, |
|
Provision |
|
Payments |
|
Balance, |
|
||||
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
||||||||||
Six Months Ended- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
June 30, 2003: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Employee severance costs |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
207 |
|
$ |
(105 |
) |
$ |
102 |
|
Idle-lease costs |
|
612 |
|
26 |
|
(144 |
) |
494 |
|
||||
Property and equipment impairment |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
||||
Vendor contract termination fees |
|
|
|
8 |
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
||||
|
|
$ |
612 |
|
$ |
245 |
|
$ |
(257 |
) |
$ |
600 |
|
June 30, 2004: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Idle-lease costs |
|
$ |
320 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
(142 |
) |
$ |
178 |
|
Amounts payable within one year have been classified as a current liability in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.
10
6. Disclosures About Segments of an Enterprise
The Company has adopted SFAS No. 131, Disclosures About Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information. The Company operates in one reportable segment (see Note 1 for a brief description of the Companys business). The total revenues are attributed to geographic areas based on the location of the end-user customer as follows:
|
|
Three
Months Ended |
|
Six Months
Ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||||
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
United States |
|
$ |
757 |
|
$ |
804 |
|
$ |
1,418 |
|
$ |
1,582 |
|
Europe |
|
190 |
|
81 |
|
314 |
|
255 |
|
||||
Israel |
|
17 |
|
167 |
|
135 |
|
329 |
|
||||
Other |
|
104 |
|
159 |
|
181 |
|
265 |
|
||||
Total revenues |
|
$ |
1,068 |
|
$ |
1,211 |
|
$ |
2,048 |
|
$ |
2,431 |
|
7. Subsequent Events
(a) Technology License Transaction
On July 7, 2004, the Company completed a $1,000,000 technology license transaction for our WebLOAD product with an original equipment manufacturer, or OEM, partner pursuant to the exercise of an option by the OEM partner under the terms of a development, publishing and distribution agreement. The technology license provides the OEM partner with expanded rights including the right to access and use source code for the WebLOAD product and the right to create derivative products. The OEM partner is required to continue to pay to the Company royalties on its sale of WebLOAD at a reduced rate through July 7, 2005, after which the OEM partner would have no further payment obligations to the Company. The OEM partner has the right to make a single payment of $250,000 to the Company within five days of the receipt of source code materials in lieu of its obligations to pay the reduced royalty.
The Company is obligated to provide product updates and technical and engineering support to the OEM partner until July 2005. The Company will recognize the $1,000,000 technology license fee as revenue over the 12-month period that commenced on July 7, 2004. . If the OEM partner elects to make the $250,000 payment in lieu of its reduced royalty obligation, then this amount would also be recognized as revenue over the same 12-month period.
(b) Office Lease
On July 20, 2004, the Company amended the lease on its Burlington, Massachusetts office space. Under the amendment, the Company substituted its original space for a smaller office at a lower base rent. The new space is for 4,929 square feet and expires in July 2009. The original lease was for 11,228 square feet and would have expired in March 2005.
11
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q concerning RadViews business outlook or future performance; anticipated revenues, expenses or other financial items; product introductions and plans and objectives related thereto; and statements concerning assumptions made or expectations as to any future events, conditions, performance or other matters, are forward-looking statements as that term is defined under U. S. federal securities laws. Forward-looking statements are subject to various risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those stated in such statements. These risks, uncertainties and factors include, but are not limited to: our history of losses; market acceptance of our products; our ability to develop new products and enhance existing products; impact of significant competition; and other factors detailed in RadViews filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Overview
We develop, market and support software that enables companies to assure the scalability, efficiency and reliability of web applications. In 1997, we introduced WebLOAD, a single-user load testing solution designed to assess the performance and accelerate the deployment of web applications. In February 2000, we introduced WebRM, a multiple-user load testing solution, which extends the functionality of WebLOAD to facilitate the collaborative testing efforts of both small and large testing teams to verify web application quality throughout the application development lifecycle. In August 2001, we introduced WebFT, a testing tool for verification of the functionality of web applications. In July 2003, we introduced WebLOAD Analyzer, a solution for identifying the root-cause of performance problems within web applications. In May 2004, we introduced TestView, a comprehensive web application testing solution that integrates WebFT for functional testing, WebLOAD for load and scalability testing and TestView Manager for test management through a central console.
On July 7, 2004, we completed a $1,000,000 technology license transaction for our WebLOAD product with Ixia, an original equipment manufacturer partner pursuant to the exercise of an option by Ixia under the terms of a development, publishing and distribution agreement. The technology license provides Ixia with expanded rights including the right to access and use source code for the WebLOAD product and the right to create derivative products. Ixia is required to continue to pay to us royalties on its sale of WebLOAD at a reduced rate through July 7, 2005, after which they would have no further payment obligations to us. Ixia has the right to make a single payment of $250,000 to us within five days of the receipt of source code materials in lieu of its obligations to pay the reduced royalty. We are obligated to provide product updates and technical and engineering support to Ixia until July 2005. We will recognize the $1,000,000 technology license fee as revenue over the 12-month period that commenced July 7, 2004. Accordingly, these revenues will be recognized commencing with the quarter ending September 30, 2004. If Ixia elects to make the $250,000 payment in lieu of its reduced royalty obligation, then this amount would also be recognized as revenue over the same 12-month period.
Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
General
We prepare our consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. As such, we are required to make certain estimates, judgments and assumptions that we believe are reasonable based upon the information available. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the periods presented. To fully understand and evaluate our reported financial results, we believe it is important to understand the significant estimates and judgments applied as they relate to our policies for revenue recognition, software development costs, restructuring costs and accounting for stock options. More detailed descriptions of these policies are provided in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements.
12
Revenue Recognition
Our revenue recognition approach requires that four basic criteria must be met before revenue can be recognized: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (2) delivery has occurred or services rendered; (3) the fee is fixed and determinable; and (4) collectibility is reasonably assured. Determination of criteria (3) and (4) is based on managements judgments regarding the fixed nature of the fee charged for services rendered and products delivered, and the collectibility of those fees. Should changes in conditions cause management to determine these criteria are not met for certain future transactions, revenue recognized for any reporting period could be adversely affected.
Software Development Costs
Software development costs incurred from the point of reaching technological feasibility until the time of general product release should be capitalized. We define technological feasibility as the completion of a working model. The determination of technological feasibility requires the exercise of judgment by our management. Because we sell our products in a market that is subject to rapid technological change, new product development and changing customer needs, we have concluded that technological feasibility is not established until the development stage of the product is nearly complete. For us, the period in which we can capitalize software development costs is very short, so the amounts that could be capitalized are not material to our financial statements. Therefore, we have charged all such costs to research and development expense in the period incurred
Restructuring Charges
In prior years, we recorded significant restructuring charges. These restructuring charges included estimates pertaining to employee separation costs and the settlements of contractual obligations resulting from our actions. In addition, we have estimated the costs for certain under-utilized facilities and have made assumptions regarding a potential sub-lessees future rental rate, as well as the amount of time required to identify a sub-lessee. To date, our actual restructuring costs have approximated the estimated costs recorded; however, actual future costs of amounts not yet paid may differ from these estimates.
Accounting for Stock Options
We account for stock options issued to employees under the intrinsic method in accordance with Accounting Principles Board, or APB, Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. Under this approach we do not record any expense at the time the options are granted unless the exercise price of a granted option is below the fair market price of our ordinary shares on the date of grant. We have provided disclosures of impact to our reported net loss and net loss per share if we had applied the fair value method. The pro forma fair value disclosures requires the application of estimates, such as estimated expected life of the options and estimated market volatility for our ordinary shares. These estimates are based on managements review of historical option lives and computations of market volatility for our ordinary shares.
13
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth, as a percentage of total revenues, consolidated statement of operations data for the periods indicated:
|
|
Three
Months Ended |
|
Six Months
Ended |
|
||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software licenses |
|
49.0 |
% |
51.4 |
% |
47.4 |
% |
53.0 |
% |
Services |
|
51.0 |
|
48.6 |
|
52.6 |
|
47.0 |
|
Total revenues |
|
100.0 |
|
100.0 |
|
100.0 |
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software licenses |
|
1.7 |
|
1.2 |
|
2.4 |
|
1.4 |
|
Services |
|
7.2 |
|
9.2 |
|
7.7 |
|
9.5 |
|
Total cost of sales |
|
8.9 |
|
10.4 |
|
10.1 |
|
10.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit |
|
91.1 |
|
89.6 |
|
89.9 |
|
89.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing |
|
84.0 |
|
85.9 |
|
83.1 |
|
93.4 |
|
Research and development |
|
59.6 |
|
53.7 |
|
61.9 |
|
61.7 |
|
General and administrative |
|
39.0 |
|
33.5 |
|
44.9 |
|
34.7 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
0.0 |
|
8.5 |
|
4.1 |
|
8.7 |
|
Restructuring charges |
|
0.0 |
|
20.2 |
|
0.0 |
|
10.1 |
|
Total operating expenses |
|
182.6 |
|
201.8 |
|
194.0 |
|
208.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss |
|
(91.5 |
) |
(112.2 |
) |
(104.1 |
) |
(119.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income, net |
|
0.3 |
|
0.8 |
|
0.3 |
|
0.9 |
|
Other expense, net |
|
(2.0 |
) |
(3.8 |
) |
(1.0 |
) |
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
(93.2 |
)% |
(115.2 |
)% |
(104.8 |
)% |
(120.8 |
)% |
Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2004 and 2003
Revenues
Total Revenues. Total revenues were $1.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004 and $1.2 million for the same period in 2003, which represents a decrease of $143,000, or 11.8%. Total revenues were $2.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and $2.4 million for the same period in 2003, which represents a decrease of $383,000, or 15.8%. The decreases in total revenues resulted primarily from a decline in sales of software licenses.
Software Licenses. Software license revenues were $523,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2004 and $622,000 for the same period in 2003, which represents a decrease of $99,000, or 15.9%. This decrease consisted of a decline in software license revenues of $105,000 from North American customers, offset, in part, by a $6,000 increase of software license revenues from international customers. Software license revenues were $970,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and reflects a decrease of $319,000, or 24.7%, as compared to software license revenues of $1.3 million for the same period in 2002. This decrease consisted of a decline in software license revenues of $214,000 from U.S. customers and $105,000 from international customers. Software license revenues decreased as a result of a decline in orders for our enterprise solution.
Services. Services revenues consist primarily of revenue from annual support and maintenance contracts and, to a lesser extent, training and consulting services. Services revenues were $545,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2004 and $589,000 for the same period in 2003. The decrease in services revenues of $44,000, or 7.5%, was lower than the decrease in revenues from software licenses due to improved renewal orders from our support and
14
maintenance business. Service revenues were $1.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004, representing a decrease of $64,000, or 5.6%, as compared to service revenues of $1.1 million for the same period in 2003. This decrease consisted of a decline in services revenues of $41,000 from U.S. customers and $23,000 from international customers.
Cost of Revenues
Cost of Software Licenses. Cost of software licenses consists principally of direct product costs, such as product media and packaging, as well as royalties due to third parties. Cost of software licenses increased to $18,000, or 3.4% of software license revenue, for the three months ended June 30, 2004 from $15,000, or 2.4% of software license revenue, for the same period in 2003. Cost of software licenses increased from $35,000, or 2.7% of software license revenue, for the six months ended June 30, 2003 to $49,000, or 5.1% of software license revenue, for the same period in 2004. These increases were due to increased royalties payable to a third party based on revenues from our WebLOAD Analyzer product introduced in July 2003.
Cost of Services. Cost of services consists principally of personnel-related costs associated with customer support and training. Cost of services decreased to $77,000, or 14.1% of service revenue, for the three months ended June 30, 2004 from $111,000, or 18.8% of service revenue, for the same period in 2003. Cost of services decreased from $230,000, or 20.1% of service revenue, for the six months ended June 30, 2003 to $157,000, or 14.6% of service revenue, for the same period in 2004. These decreases were due to reduced personnel costs to provide support and maintenance services resulting from the headcount reductions taken in the second quarter of 2003.
Operating Expenses
Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expenses consist principally of salaries and commissions earned by sales personnel, travel and marketing program costs such as trade shows, advertising and product promotion. Sales and marketing expenses decreased to $897,000, or 84.0% of total revenues, for the three months ended June 30, 2004 from $1.0 million, or 85.9% of total revenues, for the same period in 2003. Sales and marketing expenses decreased from $2.3 million, or 93.4% of total revenues, for the six months ended June 30, 2003 to $1.7 million, or 83.1% of total revenues, for the same period in 2004. These decreases were due primarily to headcount reductions of sales and marketing personnel during the second quarter of 2003 along with reduced marketing program spending.
Research and Development. Research and development expenses consist principally of salaries and related expenses required to develop and enhance the Companys products. Research and development expenses decreased to $636,000, or 59.6% of total revenues, for the three months ended June 30, 2004, from $650,000, or 53.7% of total revenues, for the same period in 2003. Research and development expenses decreased from $1.5 million, or 61.7% of total revenues, for the six months ended June 30, 2003, to $1.3 million, or 61.9% of total revenues, for the same period in 2004. These decreases were due primarily to headcount reductions of research and development personnel during the second quarter of 2003.
General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses consist principally of finance, executive and administrative salaries and related expenses, professional fees and other costs associated with being a public company. General and administrative expenses increased to $417,000, or 39.0% of total revenues, for the three months ended June 30, 2004 from $406,000, or 33.5% of total revenues, for the same period in 2003. General and administrative expenses increased from $843,000, or 34.7% of total revenues, for the six months ended June 30, 2003 to $919,000, or 44.9% of total revenues, for the same period in 2004. These increases were due primarily to additional professional fees incurred during the first quarter of 2004.
Stock-based Compensation. Stock-based compensation expense reflects the accounting charge relating to the issuance of equity instruments to employees at an exercise price below fair market value at date of grant and to all equity instruments issued to nonemployees. For stock options granted to employees, the difference between the exercise price and the fair value of the ordinary shares on the date options are granted is charged to operations as stock-based compensation expense over the vesting period of the underlying options. For stock options granted to nonemployees, the value of a particular grant as determined by the Black-Scholes valuation model is charged to
15
operations as stock-based compensation expense over the service period or vesting period of the underlying option. There was no stock-based compensation expense for the three months ended June 30, 2004 compared to $103,000 for the same period in 2003. Stock-based compensation expense was $84,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2004 compared to $214,000 for the same period in 2003. This decrease resulted from the completion of all amortization of deferred compensation. Deferred compensation on the unvested options was included as a component of shareholders equity and charged to stock-based compensation expense over the vesting period of the underlying options.
Interest Income, Net. Interest income, net consists principally of interest earned on cash investments. Interest income, net was $3,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2004 compared to $10,000 for the same period in 2003. Interest income, net was $6,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2004 compared to $24,000 for the same period in 2003. The decreases in interest income resulted from lower invested cash balances in 2004 as compared to 2003.
Other Expense, Net. Other expense, net consists principally of currency translation gains and losses. Other expense, net was $21,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2004 compared to $46,000 for the same period in 2003. There was other expense, net of $21,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2003 compared to $54,000 for the same period in 2003. The change was due to exchange rate fluctuations.
Income Taxes. We have estimated net operating loss carryforwards for Israeli tax purposes totaling approximately $21.2 million through June 30, 2004 that would reduce future Israeli income taxes, if any. These net operating losses may be carried forward indefinitely and offset against future taxable business income. We expect that during the period these losses are utilized, our income would be substantially tax exempt. Accordingly, there will be no tax benefit available from these losses and no deferred income taxes have been included in our consolidated financial statements.
Our U.S. subsidiary has estimated net operating loss carryforwards for U.S. Federal and state tax purposes totaling approximately $28.5 million through June 30, 2004. These losses are available to offset any future U.S. taxable income of the U.S. subsidiary and will expire between 2012 and 2024. The Company has recorded a full valuation allowance against its deferred tax asset due to the uncertainty surrounding the ability and the timing of the realization of these tax benefits.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash and cash equivalents totaled $3.1 million as of June 30, 2004 and as of December 31, 2003.
Cash used in operating activities have resulted substantially from our reported net losses partially reduced by noncash items such as depreciation and stock-based compensation.
Cash used in operating activities was $1.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and $2.6 million for the same period in 2003. Cash used in operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2004 was due primarily to a net loss of $2.1 million and a decrease of $215,000 in accounts payable, accrued expenses and accrued restructuring, partially offset by noncash items and an increase of $195,000 in deferred revenues. Accrued expenses and accounts payable decreased as a result of the payment of accrued payroll-related costs and professional fees. Deferred revenues increased resulting from several large support and maintenance renewal orders received during the quarter along with the receipt of a prepaid royalty from a channel partner.
Cash used in investing activities was $23,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and resulted from the purchase of $20,000 in property and equipment and an increase of $3,000 in other assets.
Cash provided by financing activities was $1.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and consisted primarily of $1.8 million of net proceeds from a private placement of 3,333,331 of our ordinary shares in March 2004 for an aggregate purchase price of $2.0 million. In connection with the private placement, the investors also received four series of warrants to purchase an aggregate of up to 2,999,996 ordinary shares at exercise prices ranging from $0.87 to $0.99 per share. Warrants to purchase 1,333,328 of these shares become exercisable only in
16
the event our ordinary shares are delisted from The Nasdaq SmallCap Market. In addition, we granted the investors an option to purchase within one year an additional 3,333,331 ordinary shares at a purchase price of $0.81 per share.
We expect that operating expenses and, to a lesser extent, our planned capital expenditures, will constitute a material use of our cash resources. We believe that our existing cash and cash equivalents, including the proceeds from our recent technology license transaction, will be sufficient to meet our anticipated needs for working capital and capital expenditures at least through June 30, 2005. We may find it necessary to obtain additional equity or debt financing. In the event additional financing is required, we may not be able to complete financing on acceptable terms or at all.
On February 11, 2004, we received a letter from the Nasdaq under which we were informed that as of December 31, 2003 we were not in compliance with Marketplace Rule 4320(e)(2)(B). This rule requires a listed company to meet one of three tests involving shareholders equity, market capitalization or net income. We provided the Nasdaq with our plan to achieve and sustain compliance with The Nasdaq SmallCap Market minimum shareholders equity requirement of $2.5 million. On April 1, 2004, at the Nasdaqs request, we filed a Form 8-K with the SEC that included a pro forma balance sheet reflecting that our pro forma shareholders equity as of February 29, 2004 was approximately $2,735,000 after giving effect to the receipt of the proceeds of our private placement of 3,333,331 ordinary shares completed on March 17, 2004. On April 5, 2004, the Nasdaq advised us in writing that, based upon its review of our Form 8-K, its staff had determined that we were in compliance with Marketplace Rule 4320(e)(2)(B) and that it had concluded its review of our eligibility for continued listing on The Nasdaq SmallCap Market.
On August 2, 2004, we received a new letter from the Nasdaq informing us that as of June 30, 2004 we did not comply with Marketplace Rule 4320(e)(2)(B). As of June 30, 2004, our shareholders equity was $1,553,000, which was below the minimum shareholders equity requirement of $2.5 million. We also do not satisfy either of the other two tests. The Nasdaq informed us that it is reviewing our eligibility for continued listing on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market. In connection with their review, the Nasdaq has requested that we provide on or before August 16, 2004 our specific plans to achieve and sustain compliance with the listing requirements. We are presently preparing a response to the Nasdaq with the requested information.
If we were to be delisted from The Nasdaq SmallCap Market, as discussed above, warrants to purchase 1,333,328 of our ordinary shares would become exercisable. In addition, in the event of a delisting, we and our shareholders may experience negative consequences, including a less liquid trading market for our ordinary shares; loss of investor confidence that could result in the decline in the trading price or volume of our ordinary shares; a decrease of our reputation with prospects, customers, employees and vendors; and reduced access to capital markets.
Contractual Obligations
We lease all of our office facilities under noncancellable operating leases that expire over varying terms through 2009. On July 20, 2004, we amended the lease to our Burlington, Massachusetts headquarters to reduce both our base rent and the square footage of our office. The amended lease will expire in July 2009. As of June 30, 2004, adjusted for the impact of our subsequent lease amendment, our contractual obligations were as follows:
|
|
Payments due by Period |
|
|||||||||||||
Contractual Obligations |
|
Total |
|
Less than |
|
1-3 years |
|
3-5 years |
|
More than |
|
|||||
|
|
(In Thousands) |
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Operating leases |
|
$ |
659 |
|
$ |
255 |
|
$ |
228 |
|
$ |
132 |
|
$ |
44 |
|
Severance pay (1) |
|
644 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
644 |
|
|||||
Total |
|
$ |
1,303 |
|
$ |
255 |
|
$ |
228 |
|
$ |
132 |
|
$ |
688 |
|
(1) Severance pay relates to accrued severance obligations to our Israeli employees as required under Israeli labor laws. These obligations are payable only upon the termination of the respective employee and may be reduced if the employees termination is voluntary.
17
ITEM 3. QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The Company does not use derivative financial instruments in its investing portfolio. The Company places its investments in instruments that meet high credit quality standards such as money market funds, government securities, and commercial paper. The Company limits the amount of credit exposure to any one issuer. The Company does not expect any material loss with respect to its investment portfolio.
The Company conducts business in various foreign currencies, primarily in Europe and Israel. As a result, the Company is exposed to the effect of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on the U.S. dollar value of foreign currency-denominated revenues and expenses. The Company does not use foreign exchange forward contracts to hedge its foreign currency denominated receivables. Looking forward, there can be no assurance that changes in foreign currency rates, relative to the U.S. dollar, will not materially adversely affect the consolidated results of the Company.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Controls and Procedures
We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Companys management, including the Companys Chief Executive Officer, or CEO, and Chief Financial Officer, or CFO, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based on this evaluation, the CEO and CFO have concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that material information is recorded, processed, summarized and reported by management of the Company on a timely basis in order to comply with the Companys disclosure obligations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the SEC rules thereunder.
Changes in internal controls
There were no significant changes in the Companys internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of the evaluation.
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
On August 5, 2004, we filed suit against Veritas Software Corporation, Veritas Software (Israel) Ltd. and Precise Software Solutions Ltd. (direct or indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries of Veritas Software Corporation), collectively the defendants. We asserted claims of trade secret misappropriation, violation of various intellectual property and statutory rights and unfair competition. The claims are based on allegations that the defendants improperly used our trade secrets received by the defendants, inter alia, from three of our former employees, who were subsequently hired by the defendants. In addition to various damages, the suit requested a temporary injunction and permanent injunction prohibiting defendants from misappropriating our technology. An initial hearing was held on August 10, 2004. On August 12, 2004, we entered into a court-approved settlement with the defendants. Pursuant to the settlement, the defendants agreed, inter alia, not to use our trade secrets, to refrain from hiring additional RadView employees for a specified period and to certain limitations for a specified period on our three former employees who are now employed by the defendants.
In addition to this lawsuit, we may be involved from time to time in litigation arising in the normal course of our business. Although we are currently not a party to any such litigation that we believe would have a material adverse effect, individually or in the aggregate, on our business or financial condition, it is possible that in the future we could become a party to such proceedings.
18
Item 2. Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds
(d) Use of Proceeds from Sale of Registered Securities
On August 9, 2000, in connection with our initial public offering, the Securities and Exchange Commission declared effective a Registration Statement on Form F-1 (No. 333-41526) that registered 5,750,000 ordinary shares.
Through June 30, 2004, we have used $34.0 million of the net proceeds of the $35.3 million from our initial public offering as follows:
$1.9 million for capital expenditures;
$1.4 million for repayment of principal and accrued interest on a loan with Rad Data Communications, Inc., a related party;
$3.8 million for repayment of principal and accrued interest on long-term debt with a bank;
$100,000 for the repurchase of ordinary shares; and
$26.8 million for working capital.
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) Exhibit Index
10.1* First Amendment to Lease Agreement dated July 20, 2004 for 7 New England Executive Park, Burlington, Massachusetts, 01803.
31.1* Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 15 U.S.C. Section 7241, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2* Certification by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 15 U.S.C. Section 7241, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32* Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
* Filed herewith
(b) Reports on Form 8-K:
On April 1, 2004, we filed a Form 8-K to report the sale of 3,333,331 of our ordinary shares at the purchase price of $0.600 per share and for an aggregate purchase price of $2.0 million in a private placement. The investors also received four series of warrants to purchase an aggregate of up to 2,999,996 ordinary shares at exercise prices ranging from $0.873 to $0.992 per share. In addition, the Company granted the investors additional investment rights to purchase within one year an additional 3,333,331 ordinary shares at a purchase price of $0.810 per share.
19
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
RADVIEW SOFTWARE LTD. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 13, 2004 |
/s/ CHRISTOPHER DINEEN |
|
|
Christopher Dineen |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
20