UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
ý QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2004
OR
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE
SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 000-30469
deCODE genetics, Inc.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Delaware |
|
04-3326704 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of |
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
STURLUGATA 8, IS-101 REYKJAVIK, ICELAND
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
+354-570-1900
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o
Indicate by check whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ý No o
The aggregate number of shares of the registrants common stock outstanding on July 30, 2004 was 54,523,043 shares of common stock $.001 par value.
deCODE genetics, Inc.
INDEX
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
deCODE genetics, Inc.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
unaudited
|
|
FOR THE THREE MONTHS |
|
FOR THE SIX MONTHS |
|
||||||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||||
REVENUE |
|
$ |
9,635 |
|
$ |
10,536 |
|
$ |
19,917 |
|
$ |
22,378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
OPERATING EXPENSES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Cost of revenue, including collaborative programs |
|
10,338 |
|
11,868 |
|
21,512 |
|
25,536 |
|
||||
Research and development proprietary programs |
|
5,385 |
|
4,829 |
|
9,644 |
|
10,832 |
|
||||
Selling, general and administrative |
|
5,589 |
|
3,809 |
|
9,852 |
|
8,066 |
|
||||
Employee termination costs |
|
0 |
|
306 |
|
0 |
|
791 |
|
||||
Total operating expense |
|
21,312 |
|
20,812 |
|
41,008 |
|
45,225 |
|
||||
Operating loss |
|
(11,677 |
) |
(10,276 |
) |
(21,091 |
) |
(22,847 |
) |
||||
Interest income |
|
746 |
|
299 |
|
981 |
|
654 |
|
||||
Interest expense |
|
(2,113 |
) |
(861 |
) |
(3,312 |
) |
(1,777 |
) |
||||
Other non-operating income and (expense), net |
|
(235 |
) |
606 |
|
(1,893 |
) |
696 |
|
||||
Net Loss |
|
$ |
(13,279 |
) |
$ |
(10,232 |
) |
$ |
(25,315 |
) |
$ |
(23,274 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Basic and diluted net loss per share |
|
$ |
(0.25 |
) |
$ |
(0.20 |
) |
$ |
(0.48 |
) |
$ |
(0.45 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Shares used in computing basic and diluted net loss per share |
|
53,543,747 |
|
51,282,154 |
|
53,235,623 |
|
51,219,783 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
deCODE genetics, Inc.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share amounts)
unaudited
|
|
JUNE 30, |
|
DECEMBER 31, |
|
||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
161,666 |
|
$ |
68,669 |
|
Marketable securities and short-term investments |
|
58,600 |
|
0 |
|
||
Receivables |
|
4,761 |
|
6,498 |
|
||
Other current assets |
|
5,285 |
|
5,894 |
|
||
Total current assets |
|
230,312 |
|
81,061 |
|
||
Restricted cash |
|
6,000 |
|
6,000 |
|
||
Property and equipment, net |
|
67,380 |
|
71,590 |
|
||
Goodwill |
|
8,863 |
|
8,863 |
|
||
Other long-term assets and deferred charges |
|
9,935 |
|
15,961 |
|
||
Total assets |
|
$ |
322,490 |
|
$ |
183,475 |
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
4,247 |
|
$ |
5,353 |
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
|
10,272 |
|
7,189 |
|
||
Short-term borrowings |
|
4,500 |
|
6,500 |
|
||
Current portion of capital lease obligations |
|
3,696 |
|
5,741 |
|
||
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
4,895 |
|
4,893 |
|
||
Deferred revenue |
|
8,200 |
|
10,518 |
|
||
Total current liabilities |
|
35,810 |
|
40,194 |
|
||
Capital lease obligations, net of current portion |
|
1,724 |
|
2,520 |
|
||
Long-term debt, net of current portion |
|
43,134 |
|
43,854 |
|
||
3.5% senior convertible notes |
|
150,000 |
|
0 |
|
||
Deferred revenue |
|
7,917 |
|
3,500 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Authorized: 6,716,666 shares Issued and outstanding: none |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
||
Common stock, $0.001 par value; |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Authorized: 100,000,000 shares; Issued: 54,521,730 and 54,003,970 shares at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively; Outstanding: 54,521,730 and 53,735,230 shares at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively |
|
55 |
|
54 |
|
||
Additional paid-in capital |
|
442,864 |
|
430,489 |
|
||
Notes receivable |
|
(3,339 |
) |
(4,240 |
) |
||
Deferred compensation |
|
(151 |
) |
(572 |
) |
||
Accumulated deficit |
|
(355,525 |
) |
(330,210 |
) |
||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
1 |
|
3 |
|
||
Treasury stock, 0 and 268,740 shares stated at cost at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively |
|
0 |
|
(2,117 |
) |
||
Total stockholders equity |
|
83,905 |
|
93,407 |
|
||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
322,490 |
|
$ |
183,475 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
deCODE genetics, Inc.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
unaudited
|
|
FOR THE SIX-MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, |
|
||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net loss |
|
$ |
(25,315 |
) |
$ |
(23,274 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
5,637 |
|
7,185 |
|
||
Amortization of deferred stock compensation |
|
813 |
|
1,098 |
|
||
Loss on disposal of equipment |
|
24 |
|
51 |
|
||
Charges for write-down of obsolete and excess materials and supplies |
|
8 |
|
797 |
|
||
(Gain)loss on derivative financial instruments.. |
|
1,465 |
|
(1,163 |
) |
||
Other |
|
355 |
|
220 |
|
||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Receivables and other assets |
|
3,216 |
|
(141 |
) |
||
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
|
2,098 |
|
(1,276 |
) |
||
Deferred research revenue |
|
8,417 |
|
(1,474 |
) |
||
Other |
|
(22 |
) |
0 |
|
||
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
(3,304 |
) |
(17,977 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Purchase of property and equipment |
|
(967 |
) |
(502 |
) |
||
Purchase of marketable securities and short-term investments |
|
(58,600 |
) |
0 |
|
||
Proceeds from sale of equipment |
|
39 |
|
46 |
|
||
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
(59,528 |
) |
(456 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Debt refinancing cost |
|
(478 |
) |
0 |
|
||
Proceeds from financing of property and equipment |
|
0 |
|
4,750 |
|
||
Proceeds from convertible debt offering (net) |
|
143,770 |
|
0 |
|
||
Issuance of common stock |
|
7,783 |
|
102 |
|
||
Proceeds from notes receivable for common stock |
|
901 |
|
65 |
|
||
Proceeds from swap close-out |
|
9,720 |
|
0 |
|
||
Payments on short-term borrowings |
|
(2,000 |
) |
0 |
|
||
Installment payments on capital lease and long-term debt obligations |
|
(3,867 |
) |
(3,087 |
) |
||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
155,829 |
|
1,830 |
|
||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
92,997 |
|
(16,603 |
) |
||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
68,669 |
|
87,244 |
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
161,666 |
|
$ |
70,641 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
deCODE genetics, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(tabular amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
References in this report to deCODE and we and us refer to deCODE genetics, Inc., a Delaware company, and deCODE genetics, Inc.s wholly owned subsidiary, Islensk erfdagreining ehf., an Icelandic company registered in Reykjavik, and its subsidiaries Encode ehf., deCODE Cancer ehf. and Vetrargardurinn ehf. as well as deCODE genetics, Inc.s wholly owned subsidiary, MediChem Life Sciences, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its subsidiaries MediChem Research, Inc., ThermoGen, Inc., Emerald BioStructures, Inc., Advanced X-Ray Analytical Services, Inc. and MediChem Management, Inc.
With its headquarters in Reykjavik, Iceland, deCODE is a population genetics company developing drugs and DNA-based diagnostics based upon its discoveries in the inherited causes of common diseases. deCODEs population approach and resources have enabled it to isolate gene and targets directly involved in the development of many of the biggest challenges to public health. deCODE is focused on turning these findings into a pipeline of products which it believes will be able to combat the cause of disease, not just the signs and symptoms. deCODEs customers include major pharmaceutical companies, biotechnology firms, pharmacogenomics companies, universities and other research institutions. deCODEs business is global, with its principal markets in the United States and in Europe.
deCODEs primary focus is on the discovery and commercialization of novel therapeutics based on genetic information identified in our population-based gene discovery work. Through the acquisition in March 2002 of MediChem Life Sciences and its subsidiary, Emerald Biostructures, now its pharmaceuticals and biostructures groups, deCODE has integrated capabilities for applying genetic findings to the development of drugs, both through its own programs and in alliance with corporate partners. deCODE is also applying the links it has identified between genetic factors and disease to create DNA based tests which can also be used to identify patients with increased risk of developing a disease or to predict which patients will respond well to a given drug therapy. deCODE believes that such tests will become a standard part of healthcare within the coming decade, making it possible to gauge individual predisposition to a particular illness and to design effective preventive strategies; to complement traditional clinical diagnoses; and to identify patients who are likely to respond or not respond to particular drugs.
In addition to conducting work on our targets in deCODEs collaborative and internal programs, the pharmaceuticals group provides drug discovery work for our fee-for-service customers. deCODEs other service offerings include protein crystallization products and protein structure analysis contract services through its Seattle-based biostructures group; pharmacogenomics and clinical trials services through its wholly-owned subsidiary Encode; and DNA analysis services through its genotyping laboratory in Reykjavik.
The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared by deCODE, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2003 has been derived from the audited financial statements as of that date, but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. deCODE believes the disclosures included in the condensed consolidated financial statements when read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes thereto included in deCODEs Annual Report on Form 10-K are adequate to make the information presented not misleading.
Certain reclassifications have been made in the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2003 to be consistent with the current presentation. These financial statements are reported in United States dollars, deCODEs functional currency, and prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
The condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the same basis as the annual financial statements and, in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments, which include only normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of deCODEs financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. The results of operations for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any other interim period or for the full fiscal year.
Revenue
deCODE records revenue provided that there is persuasive evidence that an arrangement exists, the price is fixed and determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured. deCODE has entered into research, development and commercialization alliances and collaborations with major pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies. The key components of the commercial terms of such
6
alliance arrangements typically include one or more of the following: research funding; up-front, exclusivity, technology access, and technology development fees; milestone payments; license or commercialization fees; and royalties or profit sharing from the commercialization of products.
deCODEs revenues from research and development collaboration agreements are recorded and recognized in accordance with the applicable performance requirements and terms of the respective contracts, generally either (i) as contract research costs are incurred, usually ratably over the period of effort, (ii) according to the level of efforts expended based on the ratio of contract research costs incurred to expected total costs, or (iii) upon the achievement of substantive milestones. deCODEs accounting recognition policies with respect to each significant element of our revenue is summarized as follows:
Research funding and other service fees. Research funding is recognized as earned, typically ratably over the period of effort. Funding payments are not refundable in the event that the related efforts are not successful. Other service revenues from negotiated rate contracts are recognized based upon the terms of the underlying contract generally either (i) on a per diem basis as services are rendered; (ii) on the basis efforts expended, generally upon the ratio of costs incurred to total expected costs of providing the service; or (iii) upon completion of the service rendered. Any losses on contracts are provided for when they are determinable. Included in revenue are billings to customers for the cost of materials purchased by deCODE.
Milestone payments. For contracts where (i) the milestone event is substantive, (ii) there is substantial effort involved in achieving the milestone, (iii) the milestone payment amount is commensurate with the magnitude of the related achievement, and (iv) the associated follow-on revenue streams bear a reasonable relationship to one another deCODE recognized revenue using the substantive milestone method. Under the substantive milestone method deCODE records revenue when the milestone has been achieved and payment is due and payable under the terms of the respective agreement and deCODE recognizes revenue when acknowledgement of having achieved applicable performance requirements is received from the collaborator. Milestone payments without the above characteristics are recognized on a retrospective basis over the contractual term of the underlying agreement.
Up-front, exclusivity, technology access, and technology development fees. deCODE recognizes revenue from non-refundable fees not specifically tied to a separate earnings process ratably over the expected customer relationship period or estimated period of performance. Changes in estimates could impact revenue in the period the estimate is changed. If deCODEs estimate of the period of performance shortens or lengthens, the amount of revenue we recognize from such non-refundable fees not specifically tied to a separate earnings process could increase or decrease in the period the change in estimate becomes known; future related revenues would be adjusted accordingly.
In November 2002, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) reached a consensus on Issue No. 00-21, Accounting for Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables (EITF No. 00-21). EITF No. 00-21 provides guidance on how to account for arrangements that involve the delivery or performance of multiple products, services and/or rights to use assets. The provisions of EITF No. 00-21 were applicable to revenue arrangements entered into fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2003. deCODEs adoption of EITF No. 00-21 did not impact revenue for the year ended December 31, 2003 or the three and six months ended June 30, 2004; however, this pronouncement will impact the timing of revenue in the future, including the recognition of milestone payments received.
Significant elements of our revenue are summarized as follows:
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
For the Six Months |
|
||||||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||||
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Research funding and other service fees |
|
$ |
7,606 |
|
$ |
8,756 |
|
$ |
15,503 |
|
$ |
17,357 |
|
Milestone payments |
|
|
56 |
|
|
67 |
|
|
221 |
|
|
1,432 |
|
Up-front, exclusivity, technology access, and technology development fees |
|
1,000 |
|
1,000 |
|
2,000 |
|
2,000 |
|
||||
Other |
|
973 |
|
713 |
|
2,193 |
|
1,589 |
|
||||
|
|
$ |
9,635 |
|
$ |
10,536 |
|
$ |
19,917 |
|
$ |
22,378 |
|
In general, prerequisites for billings are established by contractual terms including predetermined payment schedules, the achievement of contract milestones, or submission of appropriate billing detail. Deferred revenue represents amounts billed in accordance with contract terms but not yet recognized according to our accounting policy. Unbilled costs and fees arise when revenue has been recognized but customers have not been billed.
7
Two of deCODEs executive officers own an aggregate 37.5% of the share capital of Prokaria ehf. (Prokaria) during the six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003. deCODE provides Prokaria certain sequencing and advisory services in exchange for fees and recognized $0 and $7,000 in revenue in respect of such sequencing services provided during the six month-periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectfully.
Collaborations
F. Hoffmann-La Roche (Roche).
Therapeutics. In 1998 deCODE entered into a research collaboration and cross-license agreement with Roche, which terminated in 2002, under which deCODE identified key genetic factors involved in ten common diseases: osteoarthritis, Alzheimers disease, schizophrenia, PAOD, stroke, osteoporosis, obesity, anxiety, non-insulin-dependent diabetes and rheumatoid arthritis. In January 2002, deCODE entered into a new three-year agreement with Roche focused on turning the achievements of the 1998 gene discovery collaboration into novel therapeutics. The 2002 agreement provided that deCODE would collaborate with respect to four diseases that had been the subject of the 1998 agreement. deCODE is currently collaborating on two of those diseases. Under the 2002 agreement deCODE has received $18,000,000 in research funding and may receive an additional $2,000,000 in research funding during the remainder of the term of the agreement. The agreement provides that upon the development of specified compounds during the term of the agreement and for a specified period thereafter deCODE may receive milestone payments, the amount of which will depend on the type of compound developed. In addition, deCODE will be entitled to receive royalties on the sales of drugs that are developed.
Diagnostics. In June 2001, deCODE signed a five-year alliance with Roches diagnostics division to develop and market DNA-based diagnostics for major diseases. More recently deCODE has added research programs aimed at developing diagnostics to predict drug response for major therapeutics used to treat those diseases, in order to help select the most effective treatment of those available. Under the agreement we have received $31,750,000 in research funding, up-front fees and milestone payments. deCODE may receive $12,500,000 in additional research funding over the remainder of the term of the agreement as well as milestone payments upon the achievement of research and development milestones and royalties on the sales of diagnostic products developed.
Revenues from these alliances with Roche amounted to $3.1 million and $4.1 million for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively, representing 32% and 39% of consolidated revenue for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively, and $6.5 million and $9.5 million for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively, representing 33% and 43% of consolidated revenue for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Costs incurred in connection with these collaborative programs with Roche amounted to $4.4 million and $6.0 million for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively, and $9.7 million and $13.1 million for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
Merck & Co, Inc. (Merck).
Obesity. In September 2002, deCODE entered into an alliance with Merck aimed at developing new treatments for obesity. Under the alliance, deCODE is combining our research efforts in the genetics of obesity to identify, validate and prioritize a series of drug targets to take into development. Under the terms of the three-year agreement, which can be extended on a year-to-year basis upon the consent of the parties, deCODE has received research funding, technology access fees and milestone payments in the aggregate amount of $16,475,000 and may receive research funding and technology access fees in the future of $8,500,000. In addition, deCODE may receive further research milestone payments and may receive milestone payments as compounds developed under the alliance advance in the development process and royalties on successfully marketed drugs. Merck may terminate the agreement at any time upon 90 days notice or after September 26, 2004 upon 30 days notice in the event that the research program fails to achieve certain specified goals.
Revenues from this alliance with Merck amounted to $1.6 million and $1.6 million for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively, and $3.5 million and $3.3 million for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Costs incurred in connection with this alliance with Merck amounted to $1.3 million and $1.4 million for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively, and $2.5 million and $3.1 million for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
Information Rich Clinical Trials. In February 2004, deCODE entered into an agreement with Merck under which deCODE will conduct information-rich clinical trials on a range of Mercks developmental compounds. The term of the alliance is seven years, subject to termination by Merck after five years. deCODE will, at any given point over the course of the alliance, be conducting concurrent trials on as many as five Merck compounds. The collaboration involved three agreements: (a) License and Research Collaboration Agreement; (b) a Stock and Warrant Purchase Agreement; and (c) a Warrant Agreement. Under the terms of the License and Research Collaboration Agreement, deCODE will receive royalties on sales of drugs and diagnostics developed as part of the alliance, will receive milestone payments as compounds or pharmacogenomic tests reach the market, will receive research funding for the clinical development of compounds and pharmacogenomic analysis, and received a one-time technology access fee of $10,000,000. There is a contingency clause on the technology access fee if deCODE rejects the first two non-exclusive development
8
compounds that Merck presents to the collaboration, then Merck has the right to request a refund of $2.5 million of the technology access fee. Under the terms of the Stock and Warrant Purchase Agreement, Merck has purchased 689,703 shares of deCODEs common stock at a price of $14.50 per share or $10 million, which represents a premium of $2.7 million to the fair market value of the stock on the effective date of the agreement ($10.60). Accordingly, of the $10 million cash received, we have ascribed $7.3 million to the common stock and $2.7 million premium to deferred revenue. Under the terms of the Warrant Agreement, deCODE has issued Merck a warrant to purchase up to 1,724,257 of additional shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $29.00 per share over the next five years. The warrant shall be exercisable at the option of Merck as to 344,851 shares for a period of 30 days commencing on the first, second, third, fourth and fifth anniversaries of the Warrant Agreement with the final portion of warrants expiring in March 2009. Any portion of this warrant that is not exercised during an applicable exercise period shall expire and be of no further force or effect. The warrant was valued at $6.3 million using a Black Scholes model with the following assumptions: lives of one to five years, risk free interest rates of 1.24% to 3.07%, a volatility of 90% and no dividend yield. The one-time technology access fee and the premium portion of the equity purchase together with the estimated fair value of the warrant have been deferred and the $6.4 million net amount is included in deferred revenue at June 30, 2004 and will be recognized as revenue according to level of efforts over the seven-year development term. Merck has identified the first compound to be initiated into clinical trials and deCODE is working with Merck to complete the necessary protocols and workplans and expect to have the approvals in place during the third quarter of 2004. As such, no revenue was recognized in 2004 and costs incurred of $.1 million were deferred as of June 30, 2004.
deCODEs cost of revenue is comprised of costs of services provided to customers and collaborators, including the entirety of costs incurred in connection with programs that have been partnered and on which we receive research funding. At times, deCODE may dedicate additional resources and incur costs in addition to costs covered by research funding received in such collaborative programs. Major components of deCODEs cost of revenue include personnel costs, namely salaries, benefits and stock-based compensation; materials and supplies; services contracted for research activities; other third-party fees and costs; depreciation of property and equipment; amortization of patents and other intangible assets; and items of overhead, including allocations of various administrative and facilities related costs.
In accordance with SFAS No. 2, Accounting for Research and Development Costs, research and development costs are charged to expense when incurred. deCODEs research and development expenses consist of the costs of its own proprietary programs and consisting of the following:
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
For the Six Months |
|
||||||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||||
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Salaries and other personnel costs |
|
$ |
2,407 |
|
$ |
2,139 |
|
$ |
4,360 |
|
$ |
4,612 |
|
Materials and supplies |
|
844 |
|
587 |
|
1,363 |
|
1,509 |
|
||||
Contractor services and other third party costs |
|
653 |
|
516 |
|
1,216 |
|
1,107 |
|
||||
Overhead expenses |
|
547 |
|
474 |
|
935 |
|
1,269 |
|
||||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
873 |
|
985 |
|
1,632 |
|
2,090 |
|
||||
Stock-based compensation and remuneration |
|
61 |
|
128 |
|
138 |
|
245 |
|
||||
|
|
$ |
5,385 |
|
$ |
4,829 |
|
$ |
9,644 |
|
$ |
10,832 |
|
deCODE follows SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (SFAS No. 123). The provisions of SFAS No. 123 allow companies to either expense the estimated fair value of stock options granted to employees or to follow the intrinsic value method set forth in Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 (APB No. 25), Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and disclose the pro forma effects on net loss and net loss per share had the estimated fair value of the options granted to employees been expensed. SFAS No. 123 requires companies to expense the estimated fair value of stock options granted to non-employees. deCODE has elected to follow the intrinsic value method in accounting for its employee stock options and follows the fair value method in accounting for its non-employee stock options.
9
Stock-based compensation represents the expense charged in the statements of operations relating to employee stock options granted. Stock-based remuneration represents the expense charged in the statements of operations relating to shares of stock issued to non-employees in exchange for services provided. Stock-based compensation and remuneration are included in the statements of operations in the following captions:
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
For the Six Months |
|
||||||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||||
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
||||||||||
Research and development expense |
|
$ |
147 |
|
$ |
314 |
|
$ |
395 |
|
$ |
636 |
|
General and administrative expense |
|
405 |
|
232 |
|
418 |
|
462 |
|
||||
Total |
|
$ |
552 |
|
$ |
546 |
|
$ |
813 |
|
$ |
1,098 |
|
Had compensation cost for all stock options been determined based on the fair value at the grant date for awards consistent with the provisions of SFAS No. 123, as amended by SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure an amendment of FASB Statement No. 123 (SFAS 148), deCODEs net loss and basic and diluted net loss per share would have been changed to the pro forma amounts indicated below:
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
For the Six Months |
|
||||||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||||
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net loss attributable to common stockholders as reported |
|
$ |
(13,279 |
) |
$ |
(10,232 |
) |
$ |
(25,315 |
) |
$ |
(23,274 |
) |
Add: Stock-based compensation expense included in reported net loss |
|
552 |
|
546 |
|
813 |
|
1,098 |
|
||||
Deduct: Total stock-based compensation expense determined under fair value method for all awards |
|
(1,451 |
) |
(1,407 |
) |
(2,891 |
) |
(2,593 |
) |
||||
Net loss proforma |
|
$ |
(14,178 |
) |
$ |
(11,093 |
) |
$ |
(27,393 |
) |
$ |
(24,769 |
) |
Basic and diluted net loss per share-as reported |
|
$ |
(0.25 |
) |
$ |
(0.20 |
) |
$ |
(0.48 |
) |
$ |
(0.45 |
) |
Basic and diluted net loss per share-proforma |
|
(0.26 |
) |
(0.22 |
) |
(0.51 |
) |
(0.48 |
) |
The effects of applying the provisions of SFAS No. 123 on net loss and net loss per share as stated above is not necessarily representative of the effects on reported income or loss for future years due to, among other things, the vesting period of the stock options and the fair value of additional stock options that may be granted in future years.
In January and February 2004, deCODE granted options to purchase 216,967 shares of common stock to employees and a director under the 2002 Equity Incentive Plan.
In May and June 2004, deCODE granted options to purchase 550,267 shares of common stock to employees and 31,500 shares to consultants under the 2002 Equity Incentive Plan. The options granted to the consultants qualified for variable accounting treatment under Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 96-18 (EITF 96-18) and were valued using a Black Scholes model, 90% volatility, and a 10 year life. The fair value of these grants was $294,000 and is subject to re-measurement until all the options are vested. The compensation charge will be taken over the term of the consulting agreement.
In June 2004, in conjunction with a severance agreement with an executive officer, certain prior option grants were modified resulting in a charge of $392,000 in the quarter ending June 30, 2004.
Basic net loss per share is computed using net loss available to common stockholders and the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding. The weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period is the number of shares determined by relating the portion of time within a reporting period that common shares have been outstanding to the total time in that period.
10
Diluted net loss per share is computed using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period, plus the dilutive effect of potential common shares. Diluted net loss per share does not differ from basic net loss per share in all periods presented as potential common shares are antidilutive for all such periods and are, therefore, excluded from the calculation. Potential common shares excluded from the calculation of diluted net loss per share as their inclusion would have been antidilutive were:
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
(Shares) |
|
(Shares) |
|
Warrants to purchase shares of common stock |
|
3,124,724 |
|
1,851,300 |
|
Options to purchase shares of common stock |
|
4,728,280 |
|
2,288,000 |
|
Restricted shares with an associated outstanding non-recourse promissory note |
|
1,229,456 |
|
2,226,622 |
|
3.5% senior convertible notes |
|
10,714,286 |
|
0 |
|
|
|
19,796,746 |
|
6,365,922 |
|
In February 2004, deCODE issued a warrant to purchase 1,724,257 shares of common stock at $29.00 per share over five years to a collaborator in connection with a Stock and Warrant Purchase Agreement. The warrant shall be exercisable at the option of Merck as to 344,851 shares for a period of 30 days commencing on the first, second, third, fourth and fifth anniversaries of the Warrant Agreement. Any portion of this warrant that is not exercised during an applicable exercise period shall expire and be of no further force or effect (See Revenue Recognition Note).
In April 2004, deCODE completed an offering of 3.5% Senior Convertible Notes due 2011 to qualified institutional buyers. The Notes are convertible into shares of deCODE common stock, at the option of the holder, at a price of $14.00 per share (fair market value of $10.60 on date of issuance), which is equivalent to an initial conversion rate of approximately 71.43 shares per $1,000 principal amount of the Notes. deCODE may redeem the Notes beginning April 20, 2009. Had noteholders decided to convert their notes, the potential shares of common stock issuable at June 30, 2004 would have been 10,714,286 shares.
Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income generally represents all changes in stockholders equity except those resulting from investments or contributions by stockholders. Amounts reported in other comprehensive income include foreign currency translation adjustments and standard forward foreign exchange contracts. The following table presents the calculation of comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
For the Six Months |
|
||||||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||||
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
||||||||||
Net loss |
|
$ |
(13,279 |
) |
$ |
(10,232 |
) |
$ |
(23,274 |
) |
$(25,315 |
) |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Foreign currency translation |
|
(1 |
) |
(2 |
) |
0 |
|
1 |
|
||||
Forward foreign exchange contracts |
|
40 |
|
0 |
|
(2 |
) |
0 |
|
||||
Total comprehensive loss |
|
$ |
(13,240 |
) |
$(10,234 |
) |
$ |
(25,317 |
) |
$ |
(23,273 |
) |
|
Employee Termination Costs
Beginning in September 2002, deCODE reduced total worldwide headcount, focusing in particular on utilizing ongoing process automation and increased productivity in the core genetics operations in Reykjavik. The following is a schedule of charges, payments and unpaid termination benefits for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003:
11
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
For the Six Months |
|
||||||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||||
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
0 |
|
$ |
204 |
|
$ |
66 |
|
$ |
874 |
|
Additions to accrual |
|
0 |
|
306 |
|
0 |
|
791 |
|
||||
Payments of benefits |
|
0 |
|
(219 |
) |
(66 |
) |
(1,374 |
) |
||||
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
0 |
|
$ |
291 |
|
$ |
0 |
|
$ |
291 |
|
The charges related to termination benefits are for 17 and 44 employees during the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2003, respectively. Subsequent employee termination costs not related to the September 2002 initiative are reported as research and development or selling, general and administrative expense, as appropriate.
Cash equivalents, consisting of principally of money market funds and municipal notes purchased with initial maturities of 90 days or less, are valued at market value.
Marketable securities have been classified as available for sale and are stated at market value based on quoted prices. Gains and losses on sales of securities are calculated using the specific identification method. Marketable securities at June 30, 2004 can be summarized as follows:
|
|
Amortized |
|
Estimated |
|
||
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Money market preferred securities |
|
$ |
3,600 |
|
$ |
3,600 |
|
Total marketable securities |
|
$ |
3,600 |
|
$ |
3,600 |
|
At June 30, 2004, there were no unrealized gains or losses associated with the marketable securities included in accumulated other comprehensive income and equity. The contractual maturity of deCODEs available for sale securities is 91 days. All of deCODEs investments are classified as short-term, which is consistent with their intended use.
deCODE also has two certificates of deposit with commercial banks valued at $55,000,000, that have contractual maturities of six and seven months, respectively, that are classified as short-term investments.
During the normal course of business, deCODE is exposed to foreign currency risk and interest rate risk. These risks can create volatility in earnings and cash flows from period to period. deCODEs objective is to reduce volatility of earnings and cash flows associated with market risks.
deCODE seeks to maintain a desired level of floating-rate debt with respect to its overall debt portfolio denominated in U.S. Dollars. To this end, deCODE uses interest rate and cross-currency swaps to manage interest rate and foreign currency risk arising from long-term debt obligations denominated in Icelandic krona. These interest rate and cross-currency swaps with a combined notional amount of 1,730 million Icelandic krona are designated as economic hedges of fixed rate foreign currency debt (Tier A and Tier C bonds), but do not qualify for hedge accounting under SFAS 133. In March 2004, deCODE refinanced its Tier C bonds, with the new instrument being a variable rate U.S dollar denominated debt (See Below). Following-on from this refinancing, deCODE reconsidered its two cross-currency swaps and decided to liquidate them realizing $9,720,000 in proceeds. deCODE realized a loss on this early termination that, together with unrealized losses on the swaps during the quarter ended March 31, 2004, amounted to $1,473,000. Cumulative unrealized gains on the two cross-currency swaps through December 31, 2003 were $11,185,000. Unrealized gains on the two cross-currency swaps in the quarter ended March 31, 2003 were $202,000. Unrealized and realized gains and losses on these two cross-currency swaps are included in other non-operating income and (expense), net in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
In March 2004, deCODE entered into five forward foreign exchange contracts with an Icelandic financial institution for purposes of hedging a portion of its Icelandic krona-denominated salaries. At maturity of each contract, deCODE will sell $1,600,000 and deCODE will receive Icelandic krona at the contracted forward rate. The contracts mature monthly through July 2004. These forward foreign exchange contracts are designated as economic hedges of the foreign currency salary cash flows and qualify for hedge
12
accounting under SFAS 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (SFAS 133). Under SFAS 133 these contracts will be marked-to-market at the end of each reporting period and the estimated fair value of these instruments at June 30, 2004 is $2,000, net. As of June 30, 2004, an unrealized loss of $2,000 was included in accumulated other comprehensive income on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. During the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2004, a loss of $14,000 and $31,000, respectively, was recorded to operating expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The fair value of derivative instruments is sensitive to movements in the underlying market rates and variables. deCODE monitors the fair value of derivative instruments on a periodic basis. Fair values are estimated for each derivative using common market valuation methods with reference to available market data as of the balance sheet date.
Short-Term Borrowings
Short-term borrowings as of June 30, 2004 consists of a $4,500,000 loan with an Icelandic financial institution that is due in two traunches of $2,500,000 and $2,000,000 on August 17 and October 28, 2004 at an interest rate of 2.08% and 2.59%, respectively.
Debt
Sale-leaseback Financing
In June 2003, deCODE sold certain laboratory equipment for $4,750,000 net cash proceeds and leased the equipment back from the counter-party (an Icelandic leasing company) for an 18-month term. As ownership of the equipment will be transferred to deCODE at the end of the lease without any further significant payment, the transaction has been recorded as a financing and the gain ($1,418,000) has been deferred and is being amortized over the remaining useful life of the leased equipment (3 years). In January 2004, deCODE exercised its option to extend the loan for an additional 18 month term.
Mortgage Refinancing
In March 2004, we entered into a $17,500,000 term loan with an Icelandic financial institution (the Lender) to refinance our Tier C bonds and Tier D bank loan. The new term loan bears interest at the three-month LIBOR plus 3% (4.33% as of June 30, 2004) until March 1, 2009, at which point, the Lender may adjust the interest margin unilaterally. The term loan is payable in twenty quarterly payments starting on March 1, 2009 and the final payment is due on December 1, 2013. The term loan can be repaid on every anniversary of the loan starting on March 1, 2006, but for which we will pay a prepayment fee of 1% for every year that remains on the term loan facility with a maximum fee of 6%. The balance of the unamortized costs at June 30, 2004 was $1,758,000.
The remaining unamortized borrowing costs and discount associated with the Tier C bonds and Tier D bank loan, along with borrowing costs associated with the new term loan and the call penalty associated with the prepayment of Tier C will be amortized to interest expense over the remaining term of the new loan.
Senior Convertible Notes
In April 2004, deCODE completed an offering of 3.5% Senior Convertible Notes due 2011 to qualified institutional buyers. The Notes are convertible into shares of deCODE common stock, at the option of the holder, at a price of $14.00 per share (fair market value of $10.60 on date of issuance), which is equivalent to an initial conversion rate of approximately 71.43 shares per $1,000 principal amount of the Notes. deCODE may redeem the Notes beginning April 20, 2009. Interest is payable semi-annually on April 15 and October 15. During the three-month period ended June 30, 2004, interest expense of $1,122,000, was recorded to operating expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
From this offering, deCODE received net proceeds of $143.8 million. deCODE recorded deferred offering costs of $6.2 million. deCODE is amortizing these costs to interest expense over the seven-year life of the convertible notes. Deferred offering costs are included in other current and long-term assets and total $6.0 million at June 30, 2004. During the three and six-month period ended June 30, 2004, interest expense of $190,000, was recorded to operating expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
When as part of an acquisition deCODE acquires all of the stock or all of the assets and liabilities of a company, it assumes the liability for certain events or occurrences that took place prior to the date of acquisition. The maximum potential amount of future payments it could be required to make for such obligations is undeterminable at this time. deCODE has no liabilities recorded for these liabilities as of June 30, 2004.
deCODE enters into indemnification provisions under (i) its agreements with other companies in its ordinary course of business, typically with business partners, contractors, clinical sites and customers and (ii) its agreements with investors. Under these provisions
13
deCODE generally indemnifies and hold harmless the indemnified party for losses suffered or incurred by the indemnified party as a result of deCODEs activities or, in some cases, as a result of the indemnified partys activities under the agreement. These indemnification provisions generally survive termination of the underlying agreement. In addition, in some cases, deCODE has agreed to reimburse employees for certain expenses and to provide salary continuation during short-term disability. The maximum potential amount of future payments deCODE could be required to make under these indemnification provisions is unlimited. deCODE has not incurred material costs to defend lawsuits or settle claims related to these indemnification agreements. As a result, the estimated fair value of these agreements is minimal. Accordingly, deCODE has no liabilities recorded for these agreements as of June 30, 2004.
Other than claims and legal proceedings that arise from time to time in the ordinary course of its business which are not material, deCODE has no pending legal proceedings except as follows:
On or about April 20, 2002, an amended class action complaint, captioned In re deCODE genetics, Inc. Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation (01 Civ. 11219(SAS)), alleging violations of federal securities laws was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on behalf of certain purchasers of deCODE common stock. The complaint names deCODE, two of deCODEs current executive officers (the Individual Defendants), and the two lead underwriters (the Underwriter Defendants) for our initial public offering in July 2000 (the IPO) as defendants.
In the amended pleading, the plaintiff alleges violations of Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 and violations of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder) against deCODE, the Individual Defendants and the Underwriter Defendants. In addition, the amended complaint alleges violations of Section 15 of the Securities Act of 1933, and Section 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 against the Individual Defendants. Generally, the amended complaint alleges that the Underwriter Defendants: (i) solicited and received excessive and undisclosed commissions from certain investors in exchange for which the Underwriter Defendants allocated to those investors material portions of the shares of our stock sold in the IPO; (ii) entered into agreements with customers whereby the Underwriter Defendants agreed to allocate shares of our stock sold in the IPO to those customers in exchange for which the customers agreed to purchase additional shares of our stock in the aftermarket at pre-determined prices; and (iii) improperly used their analysts, who purportedly suffered from conflicts of interest, to manipulate the market. The amended complaint further alleges that the prospectus incorporated into the registration statement for the IPO was materially false and misleading in that it failed to disclose these arrangements. The amended complaint also alleges that deCODE and the Individual Defendants had numerous interactions and contacts with the Underwriters from which deCODE and the Individual Defendants either knew of, or recklessly disregarded, the Underwriters purported wrongful acts. The suit seeks unspecified monetary and recissionary damages and certification of a plaintiff class consisting of all persons who purchased shares of our common stock from July 17, 2000 to December 6, 2000.
deCODE is aware that similar allegations have been made in hundreds of other lawsuits filed (many by some of the same plaintiff law firms) against numerous underwriter defendants and issuer companies (and certain of their current and former officers) in connection with various public offerings conducted in recent years. All of the lawsuits that have been filed in the Southern District of New York have been consolidated for pretrial purposes before Honorable Judge Shira Scheindlin. Pursuant to the underwriting agreement executed in connection with our IPO, deCODE has demanded indemnification from the Underwriter Defendants. The Underwriter Defendants have asserted that our request for indemnification is premature.
Pursuant to an agreement the Individual Defendants have been dismissed from the case without prejudice. Along with numerous other issuers, deCODE moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim. On February 19, 2003, Judge Scheindlin granted our motion with respect to the Section 10(b) claims and denied the motion with respect to the Section 11 claims.
On July 31, 2003, our Board of Directors (other than Dr. Stefansson, who recused himself because he was an Individual Defendant) conditionally approved a proposed partial settlement with the plaintiffs in this matter. The settlement would provide, among other things, a release of deCODE and of the Individual Defendants for the conduct alleged in the amended complaint to be wrongful. deCODE would agree to undertake other responsibilities under the partial settlement, including agreeing to assign away, and not assert or release, certain potential claims we may have against our underwriters. Any direct financial impact of the proposed settlement is expected to be borne by deCODEs insurers. The Board agreed to approve the settlement subject to a number of conditions, including the participation of a substantial number of other issuer defendants in the proposed settlement, the consent of deCODEs insurers to the settlement, and the completion of acceptable final settlement documentation. Furthermore, the settlement is subject to a hearing on fairness and approval by the Court overseeing the litigation. In conjunction with the plaintiffs, the settling issuer defendants have filed a motion seeking the courts approval of the settlement. deCODE cannot currently opine as to whether or when the court may approve the settlement.
Due to the inherent uncertainties of litigation and the fact that the settlement is in its early stages, the ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be predicted. If the settlement is not consummated, deCODE expects to contest the allegations against deCODE and deCODEs officers vigorously. If deCODE was required to pay significant monetary damages as a result of such litigation (or any other lawsuits alleging similar claims filed against deCODE and deCODEs officers in the future), deCODEs business could be
14
significantly harmed. Even if such suit concludes in deCODEs favor, deCODE may be required to expend significant funds to defend against the allegations. deCODE is unable to estimate the range of possible loss from the litigation and no amounts have been provided for such matters in deCODEs financial statements.
In January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an Interpretation of ARB No. 51, (FIN 46). FIN 46 requires that if an entity has a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity, the assets, liabilities and results of activities of the variable interest entity should be included in the consolidated financial statements of the entity. FIN 46 requires that its provisions are effective immediately for all arrangements entered into after January 31, 2003. For those arrangements entered into prior to January 31, 2003, FIN 46, as amended by FIN 46R, provisions are required to be adopted in the first quarter of 2004. deCODE does not have any financial interests in variable interest entities created after January 31, 2003. The adoption of FIN 46R did not impact deCODEs financial position or its results of operations for the quarter ended June 30, 2004.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS. (tabular amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
This Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations as of June 30, 2004 and for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 should be read in conjunction with the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto set forth in Item 1 of this report.
We are a population genetics company developing drugs and DNA-based diagnostics based upon our discoveries in the inherited causes of common diseases. Our population approach and resources have enabled us to identify genes and targets directly involved in the development of many of the most common diseases. We are focused on turning these findings into a growing pipeline of products and services which we believe will be able to combat the causes of disease, not just the signs and symptoms. Our approach to research and development brings together three key types of non-personally identifiable data derived from our population research in Iceland: genotypic and disease data from more than 100,000 volunteer participants in some 50 disease-gene research programs and information that can be analyzed in tandem with genealogical data linking together the entire present-day population of Iceland and going back to the settlement of the country in the ninth century.
Our primary focus is on the discovery and commercialization of novel therapeutics based on genetic information identified in our population-based gene discovery work. Through our acquisition in March 2002 of MediChem Life Sciences and its subsidiary, Emerald Biostructures, now our pharmaceuticals and biostructures groups, we have integrated capabilities for applying genetic findings to the development of drugs, both through our own programs and in alliance with corporate partners. We are also applying the links we have identified between genetic factors and disease to create DNA-based tests which can be used to identify patients with increased risk of developing a disease or to predict which patients will respond well to a given drug therapy. We believe that such tests will become a standard part of healthcare within the coming decade; making it possible to gauge individual predisposition to a particular illness and to design effective preventive strategies; to complement traditional clinical diagnoses; and to identify patients who are likely to respond or not respond to particular drugs. We are also marketing software systems we have developed, making correlations between genetic variation and disease and drug response.
We currently derive revenues primarily from research funding and other service fees from our collaborative partners; milestone payments, and upfront, exclusivity, technology-access and technology-development fees under our collaboration agreements comprise most of the rest of our revenues. Our expenses consist primarily of research and development expenses. While we are entitled to royalties or profit-sharing under the terms of our agreements, due to the extended time period for the development and commercialization of a saleable product or therapy, we have not yet received royalties or profit sharing under any of our contracts and do not expect to do so for several years, if at all. In addition to conducting work on our targets in our collaborative and internal programs, our pharmaceuticals group provides drug discovery work for our fee-for-service customers. Our other service offerings include protein crystallization products and protein structure analysis contract services through our Seattle-based biostructures group; pharmacogenomics and clinical trials services though our wholly owned subsidiary Encode; and DNA analysis services through our genotyping laboratory in Reykjavik, Iceland.
15
As we continue our discovery in common diseases, we aim to conserve ample resources to bring our products forward to the market, and we are constantly evaluating the optimal balance between several factors crucial to our strategy. These include the level of our investment in research and development, the preservation of cash resources and their deployment for product development, and the financing environment. Our goal is to bring products to the market and, in that, make the company profitable. We believe the best means to achieve that objective is to operate the company on a sustainable basis such that it will have the staying power to turn our discoveries into products in the marketplace. As a means to this end, in late 2002 and in the face of an uncertain environment in the capital markets, we undertook measures aimed at improving our operational efficiency and at lowering our operating costs. As a benchmark, we set ourselves the goal of running our base research and development activities on a cash-neutral basis. However, this objective was not an end unto itself but rather a means to ensure that we continued to have on hand the resources to advance our key drug and diagnostic programs.
We believe that the initiation of substantial new activities, such as the conduct of clinical trials on our proprietary compounds, will require significant additional expenditures. For example, in our target discovery work on our findings in myocardial infarction, we have in-licensed a compound that was developed for a different indication but which acts upon our principal target and for which we are conducting a Phase II clinical trial in Iceland. We expect to seek similar in-licensing opportunities for other compounds in other diseases and any success may increase our cash requirements. We anticipate incurring additional net losses at least through the next several years, due to, in addition to the above-mentioned factors, depreciation and amortization, as well as stock-based compensation and other non-cash charges. We expect that our revenues and losses will fluctuate from quarter to quarter and that such fluctuations may be substantial, especially because progress in our scientific work and milestone payments that are related to progress can fluctuate between quarters. We do not believe that comparisons of our quarter-to-quarter performance are a good indication of future performance.
Following our sale of $150,000,000 of our 3.5% Senior Convertible Notes in April, 2004, we believe that we have sufficient cash resources to continue to fund our current research and operations for several years. However, we will require significant additional capital in the future for our product development programs and so will continue to investigate additional avenues of financing. Our ability to obtain capital will be affected by conditions in the global financial markets and in the pharmaceutical industry. We expect that downturns in the market valuations of biotechnology companies and of the equity markets more generally will restrict our ability to raise additional capital on favorable terms while positive movement in those markets will pose opportunities for us.
The pharmaceutical industry, which is the principal customer base for our gene-discovery and contract chemistry businesses, is experiencing difficulties in maintaining historical rates of growth. This presents near-term challenges and significant longer-term opportunities. One of the main challenges facing the pharmaceutical industry is developing pipelines of effective new drugs to treat major indications. As many leading brand-name drugs come off patent and face generic competition, developing successful new medicines will become critical for filling the gap. In the short term, the financial pressures on pharmaceutical companies may be reflected in their research and development spending, making it more difficult for us to sign corporate alliances with significant upfront funding, or lengthening the time required to negotiate such deals. We believe that in the medium to longer term, however, companies such as ours may be well positioned to play an important role in filling the gap in the pipeline of new drugs, either on their own or as partners of pharmaceutical companies. Our gene discovery programs are aimed at identifying novel drug targets that are involved in the basic biology of common diseases and we are focused on discovering new drugs against these targets, both on our own and with major pharmaceutical partners. Our partnerships with Roche and Merck demonstrate that the industry is already investing in the development of new therapeutics based on our approach. Our recent in-licensing of a developmental compound from Bayer demonstrates that the industry may be prepared to provide companies such as ours with rights to shelved compounds that may be brought forward in clinical development in indications other than those for which the compounds were originally designed.
Collaborations and Alliances
Collaborations and further growth in our medicinal chemistry, pharmacogenomics, genotyping and clinical trial services will remain an important element of our business strategy and future revenues. Our ability to generate revenue growth and become profitable is dependent, in part, on our ability to enter into additional collaborative arrangements, and on our ability and our collaborative partners ability to successfully commercialize products incorporating, or based on, our work. It is also dependent on our ability to maintain and grow our service lines of business. There can be no assurance that we will be able to maintain or expand our existing collaborations, enter into future collaborations to develop applications based on existing or future research agreements, or successfully expand our medicinal chemistry, genotyping or pharamacogenomics businesses. Our failure to successfully develop and market products over the next several years, or to realize product revenues, would have a materially adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We do not expect to receive royalties or other revenues from commercial sales of products developed using our technologies in the near term. It may be several years before product revenues materialize, if they do at all.
The following summary of the development of our drug candidates in late pre-clinical or clinical development brings up to date the
16
disclosure we made in the business section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 with respect to the status of our clinical and pre-clinical development pipeline and should be read in conjunction with the disclosures made in the business section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003. Because of uncertainties involved in the drug development process, the actual timing for the events described below may differ materially from that provided in this summary..
Our most advanced program is DGO31 for the prevention of myocardial infarction (MI). We began a Phase IIa trial in Iceland for DG031 in early April of 2004. We completed enrollment in June and expect to conclude the 200 patient trial in September of this year. We have filed an Investigative New Drug Application, or IND, for this compound with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and expect to make similar filings in selected European countries. (We refer to such filings as INDs although the technical name may differ from country to country.) Based on the results of the Phase IIa trial, we expect to begin a Phase III trial in the U.S., Iceland and Europe for this compound in the first quarter of 2005.
D151746, our second lead program is being developed for the treatment of peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD), a form of atherosclerosis in the lower extremities. The compound is an inhibitor of a G-coupled protein receptor which we have shown in preclinical work to be associated with a significant increase in risk of developing the disease. We anticipate filing an IND by the end of this year for D151746 and hope to begin a Phase 1 trial for this compound in the U.S. in the first quarter of 2005. We expect the trial will be of 4-8 weeks duration and could be finished in the second quarter of 2005.
In our stroke program, we expect to file an IND in Iceland in 2005
In one of our asthma programs, we expect to make a regulatory filing in Iceland to permit us to begin a Phase II trial for DG031 in 2004 and to commence this trial in early 2005.
We use many of our employee and infrastructure resources across several programs, and many of our research and development costs are indirectly attributable to an individually named program or are directed broadly to applicable research programs. However, taking into account costs that are specifically attributable to individual programs and allocations of our research and development program costs based upon those direct costs in 2003 and 2004 to-date, we have cumulatively invested $3.6, $3.3, $2.1 and $3.3 million in our MI, PAOD, stroke and asthma programs, respectively, from the beginning of 2003 to-date. Inception to-date costs are not available as these costs were not historically tracked by program.
We have not applied for or received marketing approval from the applicable regulatory authorities in any country for any of our drug candidates. In order for us to achieve marketing approval in the U.S., the FDA must conclude that our clinical data establish the safety and efficacy of our drug candidate. Other countries have similar requirements. Historically, the results from pre-clinical testing and early clinical trials (through Phase II) have often not been predictive of results obtained in later clinical trials. A number of new drugs and biologics have shown promising results in early clinical trials, but subsequently failed to establish sufficient safety and efficacy data to obtain necessary marketing approvals. Additional risks and uncertainties involved in the development and commercialization of any products are described further at Risk Factors, Forward-Looking Statements, and Cautionary Factors That May Affect Future ResultsWe may not successfully develop or derive revenues from any products and Clinical trials required for our product candidates or the products of our customers and partners are expensive and time-consuming. We expect that it will be several years, if ever, before we receive revenues from the commercial sale of our therapeutic products.
Furthermore, our strategy includes the option of entering into collaborative arrangements with third parties to participate in the development and commercialization of our products, such as our collaboration agreement with Roche and Merck. Entering into a collaboration with a partner at any point in the development or commercialization of a product is a business decision of ours. When making this decision we do and will consider, among other matters, the complexity of the indication, the size, complexity and expense of necessary development and/or commercialization efforts, the nature and size of the applicable market, an assessment of our own resources financial and operational, and an assessment of the resources of a potential partner. In the event that we do collaborate on any of the above programs in the future, a partner will have a level of control, which may be significant, over the pre-clinical development or clinical trial process for a product. As a result the completion date of such a partnered program could largely be under control of that third party rather than under our control. We cannot forecast with any degree of certainty which proprietary drug candidate will be subject to future collaborative arrangements or how such arrangements would affect our development plan or capital requirements.
As a result of the uncertainties discussed above, we are unable to determine the duration and completion costs of our research and development projects or when and to what extent we will receive cash inflows from the commercialization and sale of a product.
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires us to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported period. On an ongoing basis we evaluate our estimates, which include, among others, those related to collaborative arrangements, long-lived assets, materials
17
and supplies, foreign exchange transactions, income taxes and litigation and other commitments and contingencies. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form our basis for making judgments about carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. The impact and any associated risks related to these and our other accounting policies on our business or operations is discussed throughout Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations where such policies affect our reported and expected financial results. For a detailed discussion on the application of these and other accounting policies, please refer to our notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this quarterly report on Form 10Q and the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Annual Report on Form 10-K. There can be no assurance that actual results may not differ from the estimates referred to above.
Results of Operations for the Three and Six Month Periods Ended June 30, 2004 and 2003
Our results of operations have fluctuated from period to period and may continue to fluctuate in the future based upon, among other things, the timing and composition of funding under our various collaborative agreements, as well as the progress of our own research and development efforts. Results of operations for any period may be unrelated to results of operations for any other period. In addition, historical results should not be viewed as indicative of future operating results. We are subject to risks common to companies in our industry and at our stage of development, including risks inherent in our research and development efforts, reliance upon collaborative partners, development by us or our competitors of new technological innovations, ability to market products or services, dependence on key personnel, dependence on key suppliers, protection of proprietary technology, ability to obtain additional financing, ability to negotiate collaborative arrangements, and compliance with governmental and other regulations. In order for a product to be commercialized based on our research, we and our collaborators must conduct preclinical tests and clinical trials, demonstrate the efficacy and safety of our product candidates, obtain regulatory approvals or clearances and enter into manufacturing, distribution and marketing arrangements, as well as obtain market acceptance. We do not expect to receive revenues or royalties based on therapeutic or diagnostic products for a period of years, if at all.
Company highlights include:
Our revenue was $9.6 million for the three-month period ended June 30, 2004 as compared to $10.5 million for the three-month period ended June 30, 2003. Our revenue was $19.9 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2004 as compared to $22.4 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2003. These revenues reflect the long-term, product development focus of our business strategy and our corporate partnerships, as well as the unpredictable timing of milestone payments. At the close of the quarter the company had $16.1 million in deferred research revenue, compared to $14.0 million at the close of the 2003. This increase reflects cash received related to the companys new alliance with Merck, and will be recognized, along with other deferred revenue, over future reporting periods.
Our cost of revenue, including costs incurred in connection with collaborative programs, decreased to $10.3 million for the three-month period ended June 30, 2004 as compared to $11.9 million for the three-month period ended June 30, 2003. Our cost of revenue, including costs incurred in connection with collaborative programs, decreased to $21.5 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2004 as compared to $25.5 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2003. The decreases in 2004 as compared to 2003 result mainly of the streamlining and automation of our core genetics research and operations. Our cost of revenue consists of the costs of services provided to customers and collaborators, including the entirety of costs incurred in connection with programs that have been partnered and on which we receive research funding. At times, we may dedicate additional resources and incur costs in addition to costs covered by research funding received in such collaborative programs.
Our research and development expenses in proprietary programs increased to $5.4 million for the three-month period ended June 30, 2004 as compared to $4.8 million for the three-month period ended June 30, 2003. Our research and development expenses in proprietary programs decreased to $9.6 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2004 as compared to $10.8 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2003. Productivity gains have enabled acceleration in our basic gene and target discovery work. The changes our research and development expenses in proprietary programs in the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 as compared to the same periods in 2003 reflect the streamlining and automation of the our core genetics research operations but also our increasing expenditures in product development clinical work and pre-clinical preparations on our lead development programs.
In April 2004, we initiated a ten-week, information-rich Phase IIa clinical trial in Iceland that will examine the effect of various dose levels of our developmental compound DG031 on the production of leukotrienes and other biomarkers associated with vascular inflammation. Based on the results of this trial, we plan to design an information-rich, multicenter Phase III trial to test DG031 for the prevention of heart attack that may commence before the end of 2004.
At June 30, 2004, we had $226.3 million in cash and short-term investments. This includes restricted cash, cash equivalents, short-term investments and marketable securities and this significant increase reflects net proceeds from our convertible notes issue completed in April 2004 ($143.8 million), equity and technology access fee payments received related to the signing of a new drug development alliance with Merck ($20.0 million) and the liquidation of our two currency swaps ($9.7 million) offset by capital expenditures ($1.0 million), debt service ($6.3 million) and costs associated with the advancement of our drug development programs in the six-months ended June 30, 2004.
Revenue. Our business strategy is focused on turning our discoveries and assets into a broad range of products for the market, as we leverage our capabilities to generate near-term service revenue. In some instances, we are pursuing product development on our own. In others, we have formed alliances with pharmaceutical and biotechnology firms through which we can cover some of the cost of conducting basic research and spread the risk and investment involved in product development. We have entered into research, development and commercialization alliances and collaborations with major pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies across our business. Depending on the nature of each prospective business opportunity, the key components of the commercial terms of such alliance arrangements typically include one or more of the following: research funding; up-front, exclusivity, technology access, and technology development fees; milestone payments; license or commercialization fees; and royalties or profit sharing from the commercialization of products.
18
Significant elements of our revenue are summarized as follows:
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
For the Six Months |
|
||||||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||||
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
||||||||||
Research funding and other service fees.. |
|
$ |
7,606 |
|
$ |
8,756 |
|
$ |
15,503 |
|
$ |
17,357 |
|
Milestone payments |
|
56 |
|
69 |
|
221 |
|
1,432 |
|
||||
Up-front, exclusivity, technology access, and technology development fees |
|
1,000 |
|
1,000 |
|
2,000 |
|
2,000 |
|
||||
Other |
|
973 |
|
713 |
|
2,193 |
|
1,589 |
|
||||
|
|
$ |
9,635 |
|
$ |
10,536 |
|
$ |
19,917 |
|
$ |
22,378 |
|
Collaborations with our most significant partners include:
F. Hoffmann-La Roche (Roche)
Therapeutics. In 1998 we entered into a research collaboration and cross-license agreement with Roche, which terminated in 2002, under which we identified key genetic factors involved in ten common diseases: osteoarthritis, Alzheimers disease, schizophrenia, PAOD, stroke, osteoporosis, obesity, anxiety, non-insulin-dependent diabetes and rheumatoid arthritis. In January 2002, we entered into a new three-year agreement with Roche focused on turning the achievements of our 1998 gene discovery collaboration into novel therapeutics. The 2002 agreement provided that we would collaborate with respect to four diseases that had been the subject of the 1998 agreement. We are currently collaborating on two of those diseases. Under the 2002 agreement, we have received $18,000,000 in research funding and may receive an additional $2,000,000 in research funding during the remainder of the term of the agreement. The agreement provides that upon the development of specified compounds during the term of the agreement and for a specified period thereafter we may receive milestone payments, the amount of which will depend on the type of compound developed. In addition, we will be entitled to receive royalties on the sales of drugs that are developed. We expect that we will not receive research funding under the 2002 agreement after February 1, 2005, when the research term ends, unless we and Roche decide to extend the collaboration beyond that time.
Diagnostics. In June 2001, we signed a five-year alliance with Roches diagnostics division to develop and market DNA-based diagnostics for major diseases. More recently we have added research programs aimed at developing diagnostics to predict drug response for major therapeutics used to treat those diseases, in order to help select the most effective treatment of those available. Under the agreement, we have received $31,750,500 in research funding, up-front fees and milestone payments. We may receive $12,500,000 in additional research funding over the remainder of the term of the agreement as well as milestone payments upon the achievement of research and development milestones and royalties on the sales of diagnostic products developed.
Revenues from these alliances with Roche amounted to $3.1 million and $4.1 million for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively, and $6.5 million and $9.5 million for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Costs incurred in connection with these collaborative programs with Roche amounted to $4.4 million and $6.0 million for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively, and $9.7 million and $13.1 million for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
Merck & Co., Inc. (Merck)
Obesity. In September 2002, we entered into an alliance with Merck aimed at developing new treatments for obesity. Under the alliance, we are combining our research efforts in the genetics of obesity to identify, validate and prioritize a series of drug targets to take into development. Under the terms of the three-year agreement, which can be extended on a year-to-year basis upon the consent of the parties, we have received research funding, technology access fees and milestone payments in the aggregate amount of $16,495,000 and may receive research funding and technology access fees in the future of $8,500,000. In addition, we may receive further research milestone payments and we may receive milestone payments as compounds developed under the alliance advance in the development process and royalties on successfully marketed drugs. Merck may terminate the agreement at any time upon 90 days notice or after September 26, 2004 upon 30 days notice in the event that the research program fails to achieve certain specified goals.
Revenues from this alliance with Merck amounted to $1.6 million and $1.6 million for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively, and $3.5 million and $3.3 million for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Costs incurred in connection with this alliance with Merck amounted to $1.3 million and $1.4 million for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively, and $2.5 million and $3.1 million for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
19
Information-Rich Clinical Trials. In February 2004, we entered into an agreement with Merck under which we will conduct information-rich clinical trials on a range of Mercks developmental compounds. The term of the alliance is seven years, subject to termination by Merck after five years. We will, at any given point over the course of the alliance, be conducting concurrent trials on as many as five Merck compounds. The collaboration involved three agreements: (a) License and Research Collaboration Agreement; (b) a Stock and Warrant Purchase Agreement; and (c) a Warrant Agreement. Under the terms of the License and Research Collaboration Agreement, deCODE will receive royalties on sales of drugs and diagnostics developed as part of the alliance, will receive milestone payments as compounds or pharmacogenomic tests reach the market, will receive research funding for the clinical development of compounds and pharmacogenomic analysis, and received a one-time technology access fee of $10,000,000. There is a contingency clause on the technology access fee if we reject the first two non-exclusive development compounds that Merck presents to the collaboration, then Merck has the right to request a refund of $2.5 million of the technology access fee. Under the terms of the Stock and Warrant Purchase Agreement, Merck has purchased 689,703 shares of our common stock at a price of $14.50 per share or $10 million, which represents a premium of $2.7 million to the fair market value of the stock on the effective date of the agreements ($10.60). Accordingly, of the $10 million cash received, we have ascribed $7.3 million to the common stock and $2.7 million premium to deferred revenue. Under the terms of the Warrant Agreement, we have issued Merck a warrant to purchase up to 1,724,257 of additional shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $29.00 per share over the next five years. The warrant shall be exercisable at the option of Merck as to 344,851 shares for a period of 30 days commencing on the first, second, third, fourth and fifth anniversaries of the Warrant Agreement with the final portion of warrants expiring in March 2009. Any portion of this warrant that is not exercised during an applicable exercise period shall expire and be of no further force or effect. The warrant was valued at $6.3 million using a Black Scholes model With the following assumptions: lives of one to five years, risk free interest rates of 1.24% to 3.07%, volatility of 90% and no dividend yield. The one-time technology access fee and the premium portion of the equity purchase together with the estimated fair value of the warrant have been deferred and the $6.4 million net amount is included in deferred revenue at June 30, 2004 and will be recognized as revenue according to level of efforts over the seven-year development term. Merck has identified the first compound to be initiated into clinical trials and we are working with Merck to complete the necessary protocols and workplans and expect to have approvals in place during the third quarter of 2004. As such, no revenue was recognized in 2004 and costs incurred of $.1 million were deferred as of June 30, 2004.
Revenue for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 is as follows:
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
For the Six Months |
|
2004 as Compared to 2003 |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
Ended June 30, |
|
Three Months |
|
Six Months |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
||||||
|
|
(In thousands, except for%) |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue |
|
$ |
9,635 |
|
$ |
10,536 |
|
$ |
19,917 |
|
$ |
22,378 |
|
$ |
(901 |
) |
(9 |
)% |
$ |
(2,461 |
) |
(11 |
)% |
The decreases in revenue in the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 as compared to the same periods in 2003 are reflective of the long-term, product development focus of our business strategy and our corporate partnerships, as well as the unpredictable timing of milestone payments. At the close of the quarter the company had $16.1 million in deferred revenue, compared to $14.0 million at the close of the 2003. This increase is reflects cash received related to our new alliance with Merck, and will be recognized, along with other deferred revenue, over future reporting periods. We expect that our revenues will fluctuate from quarter to quarter and that such fluctuations may be substantial especially because progress in our scientific work, including milestone payments that are related to progress, can and do fluctuate between quarters.
Cost of Revenue, including Collaborative Programs. Cost of revenue, including costs incurred in connection with collaborative programs for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 are as follows:
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
For the Six Months |
|
2004 as Compared to 2003 |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
Ended June 30, |
|
Three Months |
|
Six Months |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
||||||
|
|
(In thousands, except for%) |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of Revenue, including Collaborative Programs |
|
$ |
10,338 |
|
$ |
11,868 |
|
$ |
21,512 |
|
$ |
25,536 |
|
$ |
(1,530 |
) |
(13 |
)% |
$ |
(4,024 |
) |
(16 |
)% |
Productivity gains have enabled acceleration in our basic gene and target discovery work. The decreases in our cost of revenue, including costs incurred in connection with collaborative programs for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 as compared to the same periods in 2003 generally reflect the streamlining and automation of our core genetics research and other
20
operations. Our cost of revenue comprises the costs of services provided to customers and collaborators, including the entirety of costs incurred in connection with programs that have been partnered and on which we receive research funding. At times, we may invest in addition to costs covered by research funding received in such collaborative programs.
Our cost of revenue, including costs incurred in connection with collaborative programs in the three-months ended June 30, 2004 as compared to the same period in 2003 notably reflect (i) $1.0 million lower salary and related expenses, (ii) $0.6 million lower depreciation and amortization charge, and (iii) a relative net benefit of $0.2 million resulting from chemicals and consumables we used for which there was relatively little or no attendant cost as a result of prior provisions we had made as slow moving, excess or obsolete according to our accounting policy.
Our cost of revenue, including costs incurred in connection with collaborative programs in the six-months ended June 30, 2004 as compared to the same period in 2003 include (i) $2.1 million lower salary and related expenses, (ii) $1.0 million lower depreciation and amortization charge, and (iii) a relative net benefit of $0.8 million resulting from chemicals and consumables we used for which there was relatively little or no attendant cost as a result of prior provisions we had made as slow moving, excess or obsolete according to our accounting policy.
Research and Development Proprietary Programs. Research and development expenses for proprietary programs for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 are as follows:
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
For the Six Months |
|
2004 as Compared to 2003 |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
Ended June 30, |
|
Three Months |
|
Six Months |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
||||||
|
|
(In thousands, except for%) |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Research and Development - Proprietary Programs |
|
$ |
5,385 |
|
$ |
4,829 |
|
$ |
9,644 |
|
$ |
10,832 |
|
$ |
556 |
|
12 |
% |
$ |
(1,188 |
) |
(11 |
)% |
Productivity gains have enabled acceleration in our basic gene and target discovery work. The changes our research and development expenses in proprietary programs in the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 as compared to the same periods in 2003 reflect the streamlining and automation of the our core genetics research operations but also our increasing expenditures in product development clinical work and pre-clinical preparations on our lead development programs. Importantly, in April 2004, we initiated a ten-week, information-rich Phase IIa clinical trial in Iceland that will examine the effect of various dose levels of our developmental compound DG031 on the production of leukotrienes and other biomarkers associated with vascular inflammation. Based on the results of this trial, we plan to design an information-rich, multicenter Phase III trial to test DG031 for the prevention of heart attack.
Our research and development costs for proprietary programs in the three-months ended June 30, 2004 as compared to the same period in 2003 notably reflect (i) a relative net benefit of $0.1 million resulting from chemicals and consumables we used for which there was relatively little or no attendant cost as a result of prior provisions we had made as slow moving, excess or obsolete according to our accounting policy, (ii) $0.4 million related to increased usage of other chemicals and consumables, (iii) $0.1 million for additional employee incentives.
Our research and development costs for proprietary programs in the six-months ended June 30, 2004 as compared to the same period in 2003 include (i) $0.6 million lower salary and related expenses, (ii) a relative net benefit of $0.5 million resulting from chemicals and consumables we used for which there was relatively little or no attendant cost as a result of prior provisions we had made as slow moving, excess or obsolete according to our accounting policy, (iii) $0.3 million related to increased usage of other chemicals and consumables, and (iv) a $0.4 million lower depreciation and amortization charge.
Several of the above-noted increases and decreases to the research and developments costs of our proprietary programs are likely non-recurring or irregular in their occurrence. Other of the experienced increases in the research and developments costs of our proprietary programs (e.g., usage of chemicals and consumables, salary rises) may likely continue, particularly as we advance our own drug development programs
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 are as follows:
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
For the Six Months |
|
2004 as Compared to 2003 |
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
Ended June 30, |
|
Three Months |
|
Six Months |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
$ |
Change |
|
% Change |
|
$ |
Change |
|
% Change |
|
|||||
|
|
(In thousands, except for%) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Selling, General and Administrative |
|
$ |
5,589 |
|
$ |
3,809 |
|
$ |
9,852 |
|
$ |
8,066 |
|
$ |
1,780 |
|
47 |
% |
$ |
1,786 |
|
22 |
% |
|
21
The increases in selling, general and administrative expenses for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 as compared to the same periods in 2003 mainly arise as a result of an increase in our directors and officers insurance premium (increases of $0.3 million and $0.7million, respectively, for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 as compared to the same periods in 2003), severance costs recorded in the quarter ended June 30, 2004 ($0.6 million), employee incentives provided for in the quarter ended June 30, 2004 ($0.6 million), and an accrual for probable losses related to grant monies received in pre-acquisition periods of Medichem ($0.4 million). Several of the above items are likely non-recurring or irregular in their occurrence. Other of the experienced increases in our selling, general and administrative expenses (e.g., the direct and indirect costs of compliance with the Sarbanes Oxley legislation, salary rises) may likely continue.
Stock Based Compensation and Remuneration Expense. Stock based compensation and remuneration expense for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 are as follows:
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
For the Six Months |
|
2004 as Compared to 2003 |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
Ended June 30, |
|
Three Months |
|
Six Months |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
||||||
|
|
(In thousands, except for%) |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Stock Based Compensation and Remuneration Expense |
|
$ |
552 |
|
$ |
546 |
|
$ |
813 |
|
$ |
1,098 |
|
$ |
6 |
|
1 |
% |
$ |
(285 |
) |
(26 |
)% |
The increase in stock based compensation for the three-month period ended June 30, 2004 is due to the modification of an option grant to an employee and the associated expense ($0.4 million), otherwise there has been little compensation expense being attributed to our more recent stock option grants, stock-based compensation and remuneration expense has been decreasing as grants made to employees in earlier years become fully vested. Historical stock-based compensation and remuneration is not necessarily representative of the effects on reported income or loss for future years due to, among other things, the vesting period of the stock options, the value of stock options that have been granted in recent times and the value of additional options that may be granted in future years.
Employee Termination Charges. Impairment, employee termination benefits and other costs for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 are as follows:
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
For the Six Months |
|
2004 as Compared to 2003 |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
Ended June 30, |
|
Three Months |
|
Six Months |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
||||||
|
|
(In thousands, except for%) |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Employee Termination Charges |
|
$ |
0 |
|
$ |
306 |
|
$ |
0 |
|
$ |
791 |
|
$ |
(306 |
) |
(100 |
)% |
$ |
(791 |
) |
(100 |
)% |
Beginning in September 2002, we implemented a cost reduction program aimed at achieving positive operating cashflow from existing operations by the end of 2003. In this regard, we reduced total worldwide headcount, focusing in particular on utilizing ongoing process automation and increased productivity in the core genetics operations in Reykjavik, Iceland. During the year ended December 31, 2003, we recorded $951,000 of additional employee terminations benefits. The following summarizes the charges, payments and unpaid termination benefits for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 related to the September 2002 initiative:
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
For the Six Months |
|
||||||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||||
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
||||||||||
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
0 |
|
$ |
204 |
|
$ |
66 |
|
$ |
874 |
|
Additions to accrual |
|
0 |
|
306 |
|
0 |
|
791 |
|
||||
Payments of benefits |
|
0 |
|
(219 |
) |
(66 |
) |
(1,374 |
) |
||||
Balance at June 30 |
|
$ |
0 |
|
$ |
291 |
|
$ |
0 |
|
$ |
291 |
|
22
The charges related to termination benefits are for 17 and 44 employees during the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2003. Cost of severances subsequent to and not related to the September 2002 initiative are reported as research and development or selling, general and administrative expenses, as appropriate.
Interest Income. Interest income for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 is as follows:
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
For the Six Months |
|
2004 as Compared to 2003 |
|
||||||||||||||||
Three Months |
|
Six Months |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
||||||
|
|
(In thousands, except for%) |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Interest Income |
|
$ |
746 |
|
$ |
299 |
|
$ |
981 |
|
$ |
654 |
|
$ |
447 |
|
149 |
% |
$ |
327 |
|
50 |
% |
The increases in interest income for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 as compared to the same periods in 2003 mainly arise as a result of the completion of the offering of 3.5% Senior Convertible Notes realizing net proceeds of $143.8 million. We expect to use the proceeds of this offering principally for advancing our drug development programs. In the meantime, we will invest the monies received in accordance with our policy, having the objective of preserving principal while maximizing income we receive from our investments without significantly increasing risk. We expect to maintain our portfolio of cash equivalents and short-term investments in a variety of securities, including commercial paper, money market funds and government and non-government debt securities. As a result, we expect that the amount of our interest income will increase in the future although the rate of returns on the portfolio may not increase appreciably.
Interest Expense. Interest expense for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 is as follows:
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
For the Six Months |
|
2004 as Compared to 2003 |
|
||||||||||||||||
Three Months |
|
Six Months |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
||||||
|
|
(In thousands, except for%) |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Interest Expense |
|
$ |
2,113 |
|
$ |
861 |
|
$ |
3,312 |
|
$ |
1,777 |
|
$ |
1,252 |
|
145 |
% |
$ |
1,535 |
|
86 |
% |
The increases in interest expense for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 as compared to the same period in 2003 principally reflect interest on our 3.5% Senior Convertible Notes due 2011 that we issued in April 2004. We will pay interest on the Senior Convertible Notes in April and October of each year, beginning October 2004. As a result, our interest expense will increase $5.3 million annually.
Other Non-Operating Income and Expense, Net. Other non-operating income and expense for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 is as follows:
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
For the Six Months |
|
2004 as Compared to 2003 |
|
||||||||||||||||
Three Months |
|
Six Months |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
||||||
|
|
(In thousands, except for%) |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Other Non-Operating Income and (Expense), Net |
|
$ |
(235 |
) |
$ |
606 |
|
$ |
(1,893 |
) |
$ |
696 |
|
$ |
(841 |
) |
(139 |
)% |
$ |
(2,589 |
) |
(372 |
)% |
Our other non-operating income and expense, net for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 comprises unrealized and realized swap gains and losses and the net impact of foreign exchange. In March 2004, we liquidated our two cross-
23
currency swaps receiving $9.7 million in proceeds. We realized a loss on this early termination that, together with unrealized losses on the swaps during the quarter ended March 31, 2004, amounted to $1.5 million.
Unrealized (losses)/gains on the two cross-currency swaps for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 were $0 and $1.0 million, respectively, and for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 were $(1.5) and $1.2 million, respectively.
Net foreign exchange losses for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 were $0.2 and $0.4 million, respectively, and for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 were $0.4 and $0.5 million, respectively.
Income Taxes. As of June 30, 2004, we had an accumulated deficit of $355.5 million and did not owe any Icelandic or U.S. federal income taxes nor did we pay any in the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003. Realization of deferred tax assets is dependent on future earnings, if any. As of December 31, 2003, we had net operating losses able to be carried forward for U.S. federal income tax purposes of approximately $31.4 million to offset future taxable income in the United States that expire at various dates through 2023. Also, as of December 31, 2003, our foreign subsidiaries had net operating losses carried forward of approximately $146.3 million that expire in varying amounts beginning in 2006.
Net Loss and Basic and Diluted Net Loss Per Share. Net loss and basic and diluted net loss per share for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 are as follows:
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
For the Six Months |
|
2004 as Compared to 2003 |
|
||||||||||||||||
Three Months |
|
Six Months |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
||||||
|
|
(In thousands, except for%) |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Net Loss |
|
$ |
13,279 |
|
$ |
10,232 |
|
$ |
25,315 |
|
$23,274 |
|
$ |
3,047 |
|
30 |
% |
$ |
2,041 |
|
9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and Diluted Net Loss Per Share |
|
$ |
(0.25 |
) |
$ |
(0.20 |
) |
$ |
(0.48 |
) |
$ |
(0.45 |
) |
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
25 |
% |
$ |
0.03 |
|
7 |
% |
Net loss and basic and diluted net loss per share both increased principally due to lower revenues, higher interest expense related to our convertible debt and general and administrative expenses, offset in part by the efficiencies gained in streamlining and automation of our core genetics research operations.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We have financed our operations primarily through funding from research and development collaborative agreements and the issuance of equity securities and long-term financing instruments ($691 million from the beginning of 1999 to-date). Future funding under terms of our existing agreements is approximately $58 million excluding milestone payments and royalties that we may earn under such collaborations. In April 2004, we completed an offering of 3.5% Senior Convertible Notes in which we received $144 million, net of expenses.
Although we currently depend upon funded research arrangements for a significant portion of our revenue, we continue to invest in proprietary research and we will incur the costs of such research. In the near term, this will require us to continue to make investments in our in-house capabilities for downstream development which we believe will better position us to capture the most value to us in our discoveries. As we identify promising discoveries for further development, we may choose to continue the development ourselves into and through clinical trials, regulatory clearances and manufacture, distribution and marketing. In other cases we are or will be working to varying degrees with partners. The decisions we make as to these matters will affect our cash requirements.
Based upon the range of our current activities, and without regard to the proceeds from our recent offering of Senior Convertible Notes and any changes we may make in advancing our drug development programs as a result of the additional resources provided by the offering, we currently expect to have an overall net use of cash in 2004 in our operating, investing and financing activities very similar to that used in 2003 ($18.6 million). Debt service in 2004 together with net payments on short-term borrowings are expected to amount to $15.0 million, excluding the additional $5.2 million annual interest on our new 3.5% Senior Convertible Notes.
In February 2004, we received total proceeds of $20.0 million from Merck for their purchase of deCODE common stock and an upfront technology access fee. Of the $20.0 million received, $7.3 million has been ascribed to the value of the common stock and $12.7 million considered upfront payments associated with the collaboration. Although our capital expenditure needs and other investing activities may in the future fluctuate significantly from period to period, we currently anticipate that we will largely only make replacement capital expenditures in 2004. We will continue to carefully manage our basic operating costs. However, having completed our $150,000,000 Senior Convertible Notes offering we are better positioned to advance our own programs and to make decisions as to which programs to partner and how. We are able and ready to deploy the necessary resources to bring our proprietary programs into the clinic and we will be re-examining our strategic options in advancing such programs. Our most advanced proprietary drug discovery programs are in myocardial infarction and peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD). In our myocardial
24
infarction program we in-licensed DG031 in the fourth quarter of 2003, a compound that we will be testing in the clinic as a treatment for vascular inflammation and the prevention of heart attack and in April 2004 we began our Phase II information-rich clinical trial. In our PAOD program, during 2003 we advanced into screening of lead compounds and we anticipate filing an investigational new drug (IND) application in PAOD by the end of 2004 and aims to begin Phase I clinical trials in the first quarter of 2005.
|
|
For the Six Month |
|
||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash provided by (used in): |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Operating activities |
|
$ |
(3,304 |
) |
$ |
(17,977 |
) |
Investing activities |
|
(59,528 |
) |
(456 |
) |
||
Financing activities |
|
161,666 |
|
(1,830 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents, at end of period |
|
$ |
161,666 |
|
$ |
70,641 |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents. At June 30, 2004, we had $161.7 million in cash and cash equivalents as compared to $68.7 million at December 31, 2003. Together with our restricted cash and resources put into short-term investments and marketable securities at June 30, 2004, this balance is approximately $151.6 million more than at the close of the fourth quarter of 2003. The increase reflects net proceeds from our convertible notes issue completed in April 2004 ($143.8 million), equity and technology access fee payments received related to the signing of a new drug development alliance with Merck ($20.0 million) and the liquidation of our two currency swaps ($9.7 million) offset with capital expenditures ($1.0 million), debt service ($6.3 million) and costs associated with the advancement of our drug development programs.
Our resources are invested in accordance with our investment policys primary objectives of liquidity, safety of principal and diversity of investments. Our cash and short-term investments are only deposited in or invested with financial institutions in Iceland, the United Kingdom and the United States having a high credit standing. At June 30, 2004, our cash is largely invested in U.S. dollar denominated money market and checking accounts and also in Icelandic krona denominated accounts. At June 30, 2004, our cash equivalents and our marketable securities are principally investments in auction-rate preferred securities, and our short-term investments consist of certificates of deposit with maturities up to seven months.
Operating Activities. Net cash used in operating activities decreased to $3.3 million for the six-months ended June 30, 2004 as compared to $18.0 million for the same period in 2003. Together with the $12.7 million technology access fee and premium on common stock received from Merck in the six-months ended June 30, 2004, working capital provided $13.7 million of funds as compared to a use $2.9 million in the six-month period ended June 30, 2003. As more fully described above, the decrease in use of cash in operating activities reflects both the successful streamlining and automation of the companys core genetics research operations and research and development investments being made in advancing our drug development programs.
Investing Activities. Our investing activities have consisted of capital expenditures and long-term strategic equity investments in, and acquisitions of, technologies and businesses that are complementary to our business. Purchases of property and equipment during the six-month period ended June 30, 2004 were $1.0 million as compared to $0.5 million in the six-month period ended June 30, 2003. We principally made replacement capital expenditures during 2003 and into 2004 and did invest in certain equipment for our statistical lab during the six-months ended June 30, 2004. Although we expect to continue to make simply replacement capital expenditures, net cash used in investing activities may in the future fluctuate significantly from period to period due to the timing of our capital expenditures and other investments.
Investments in marketable securities and short-term investments during the six-month period ended June 30, 2004 consist of money market preferred securities and certificates of deposit with maturities of up to seven months.
Financing Activities. Net cash of $155.8 million was provided in financing activities in the six-month period ended June 30, 2004, as compared to $1.8 million used in financing activities in the six-month period ended June 30, 2003. Financing activities for the six-month period ended June 30, 2004 largely consisted of net proceeds from our convertible notes issue completed in April 2004 ($143.8 million), proceeds on the issuance of common stock to Merck ($7.7 million), proceeds in the liquidation of our two cross-currency swap ($9.7 million) and installment payments on our existing debt and capital lease obligations ($6.3 million).
In April 2004, we completed an offering of 3.5% Senior Convertible Notes due 2011 to qualified institutional buyers. In addition to the $125.0 million principal amount of Notes offered, we issued a further $25.0 million of Notes pursuant to the exercise of the over-allotment option by the initial purchasers of the Notes. The Notes are convertible into shares of our common stock, at the option of the holder, at a price of $14.00 per share, equivalent to an initial conversion rate of approximately 71.43 shares per $1,000 principal amount of the Notes. We may redeem the Notes beginning April 20, 2009. We expect to use the proceeds of the offering principally for advancing our drug development programs, as well as for general corporate purposes.
25
In March 2004, we entered into a $17,500,000 term loan with an Icelandic financial institution (the Lender) to refinance our Tier C bonds and Tier D bank loan, thereby securing a significantly lower interest rate and extended payment terms on this portion of our mortgage obligations. The new term loan bears interest at the three-month LIBOR plus 3% (4.33% as of June 30, 2004) until March 1, 2009, at which point, the Lender may adjust the interest margin unilaterally. The term loan is payable in twenty quarterly payments starting on March 1, 2009 and the final payment is due on December 1, 2013. The term loan can be repaid on every anniversary of the loan starting on March 1, 2006, but for which we will pay a prepayment fee of 1% for every year that remains on the term loan facility with a maximum fee of 6%.
Contractual Commitments. Our major outstanding contractual commitments relate to the privately placed bonds and bank loans and equipment lease financings. Our contractual commitments as of June 30, 2004 were as follows:
|
|
Payments Due by period |
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
Total |
|
Less Than |
|
1-3 Years |
|
3-5 Years |
|
More than |
|
|||||
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|||||||||||||
3.5% senior convertible notes |
|
$ |
150,000 |
|
$ |
0 |
|
$ |
0 |
|
$ |
0 |
|
$ |
150,000 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
48,292 |
|
|
4,819 |
|
|
19,169 |
|
|
8,534 |
|
|
15,770 |
|
Capital lease obligations, including interest |
|
5,584 |
|
3,834 |
|
1,688 |
|
62 |
|
0 |
|
|||||
Operating leases |
|
1,776 |
|
1,178 |
|
597 |
|
1 |
|
0 |
|
|||||
|
|
$ |
205,652 |
|
$ |
9,831 |
|
$ |
21,454 |
|
$ |
8,597 |
|
$ |
165,770 |
|
General. We believe that our existing resources will be adequate to satisfy our capital needs for several years. Our cash requirements depend on numerous factors, including our ability to obtain new research collaboration agreements, to obtain subscription and collaboration agreements for the database services; to obtain and maintain contract service agreements in our chemistry services and clinical research trials groups; expenditures in connection with alliances, license agreements and acquisitions of and investments in complementary technologies and businesses; competing technological and market developments; the cost of filing, prosecuting, defending and enforcing patent claims and other intellectual property rights; the purchase of additional capital equipment, including capital equipment necessary to ensure that our sequencing and genotyping operations remain competitive; and capital expenditures required to expand our facilities. Changes in our research and development plans, the entry into clinical trials of a drug based on our discoveries, or other changes affecting our operating expenses may result in changes in the timing and amount of expenditures of our capital resources.
We will require significant additional capital in the future, which we may seek to raise through further public or private equity offerings, additional debt financing or added collaborations and licensing arrangements. No assurance can be given that additional financing or collaborations and licensing arrangements will be available when needed, or that if available, will be obtained on favorable terms. If adequate funds are not available when needed, we may have to curtail operations or attempt to raise funds on unattractive terms.
In January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an Interpretation of ARB No. 51, (FIN 46). FIN 46 requires that if an entity has a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity, the assets, liabilities and results of activities of the variable interest entity should be included in the consolidated financial statements of the entity. FIN 46 requires that its provisions are effective immediately for all arrangements entered into after January 31, 2003. For those arrangements entered into prior to January 31, 2003, FIN 46, as amended by FIN 46R, provisions are required to be adopted in the first quarter of 2004. We do not have any financial interests in variable interest entities created after January 31, 2003. The adoption of FIN 46R did not impact on our financial position or its results of operations.
RISK FACTORS, FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS, AND CAUTIONARY FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE RESULTS
This report contains forward-looking statements. These statements relate to future events or our future financial performance. In some
26
cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by terminology such as may, will, should, could, expect, plan, anticipate, believe, estimate, predict, intend, potential or continue or the negative of such terms or other comparable terminology. These statements are only predictions. We cannot assure our investors that our expectations and assumptions will prove to have been correct. We undertake no intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a
result of future events, new information or otherwise. Actual events or results may differ materially due to a number of factors, including those set forth in this section and elsewhere in this Form 10-Q. These factors include, but are not limited to, the risks set forth below.
We may not successfully develop or derive revenues from any products.
We use our technology and research capabilities primarily to identify genes or gene fragments that are responsible for certain diseases, indicate the presence of certain diseases or cause or predispose individuals to certain complex diseases. Although we have identified genes that we believe are likely to cause certain diseases, we may not be correct and may not be successful in identifying any other similar genes. Many experts believe that some of the diseases we are targeting are caused by both genetic and environmental factors. Even if we identify specific genes that are partly responsible for causing diseases, any gene-based therapeutic or diagnostic products may not detect, prevent, treat or cure a particular disease. Accordingly, even if we are successful in identifying specific genes, our discoveries may not lead to the development of commercial therapeutic or diagnostic products.
Any pharmaceutical or diagnostic products that we or our collaborators are able to develop will fail to produce revenues unless we:
establish that they are safe and effective;
successfully compete with other technologies and products;
ensure that they do not infringe on the proprietary rights of others;
establish that they can be manufactured in sufficient quantities at reasonable costs; and
can market them successfully.
We may not be able to meet these conditions. We expect that it will be years, if ever, before we will recognize significant revenue from the development of therapeutic or diagnostic products.
Our informatics products may not meet the needs of potential customers. We have generated little revenue from sales or licenses of informatics products. We cannot assure you that we can successfully develop or commercialize, or that there will be a market for, our informatics products.
If we continue to incur operating losses longer than anticipated, or in amounts greater than anticipated, we may be unable to continue our operations.
We incurred a net loss of $25.3 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2004, and had an accumulated deficit of $355.5 million at June 30, 2004. We have never generated a profit and we have not generated revenues except for payments received in connection with our research and development collaborations with Roche, Merck and other collaborations, and from contract services. Our research and development expenditures and general and administrative costs have exceeded our revenue to date, and we expect to spend significant additional amounts to fund research and development in order to enhance our core technologies and undertake product development (including drug development and related clinical trials) and to prepare our informatics products. We do not expect to receive royalties or other revenues from commercial sales of products developed using our technology in the near term. It may be several years before product revenues materialize, if they do at all. As a result, we expect to incur net losses for several years. If the time required to generate product revenues and achieve profitability is longer than we currently anticipate or the level of losses is greater than we currently anticipate, we may not be able to continue our operations.
If our assumption about the role of genes in disease is wrong, we may not be able to develop useful products.
The products we hope to develop involve new and unproven approaches. They are based on the assumption that information about genes may help scientists to better understand complex disease processes. Scientists generally have a limited understanding of the role of genes in diseases, and few products based on gene discoveries have been developed. Of the products that exist, all are diagnostic products. To date, we know of no therapeutic products based on disease-gene discoveries. If our assumption about the role of genes in the disease process is wrong, our gene discovery programs may not result in products, the genetic data included in our database and informatics products may not be useful to our customers and those products may lose any competitive advantage.
27
Clinical trials required for our product candidates or the products of our customers and partners are expensive and time-consuming, and their outcome is uncertain.
Before obtaining regulatory approvals for the commercial sale of any of our products under development, we must demonstrate through pre-clinical studies and clinical trials that the product is safe and effective for use in each target indication. Pre-clinical testing and clinical development are long, expensive and uncertain processes. It may take several years to complete testing for a product and failure can occur at any stage of testing. The length of time necessary to complete clinical trials varies significantly and may be difficult to predict. Factors that can cause delay or termination of our clinical trials include:
slower than expected patient enrollment due to the nature of the protocol, the proximity of patients to clinical sites, the eligibility criteria for the study, competition with clinical trials for other drug candidates or other factors;
lower than expected retention rates of patients in a clinical trial;
inadequately trained or insufficient personnel at the study site to assist in overseeing and monitoring clinical trials;
delays in approvals or failure to obtain approval from the pertinent review board for studies conducted at sites outside of Iceland;
delays in approvals or the failure to obtain approval from the National Bioethics Committee for trials in Iceland;
longer treatment time required to demonstrate effectiveness or determine the appropriate product dose;
lack of sufficient supply of the product candidate;
adverse medical events or side effects in treated patients;
lack of effectiveness of the product candidate being tested; and
regulatory changes.
Even if we obtain positive results from pre-clinical or clinical trials for a particular product, we may not achieve the same success in future trials of that product. In addition, some or all of the clinical trials we undertake may not demonstrate sufficient safety and efficacy to obtain the requisite regulatory approvals, which could prevent the creation of marketable products. Our product development costs will increase if we have delays in testing or approvals, if we need to perform more or larger clinical trials than planned or if our trials are not successful. Delays in our clinical trials may harm our financial results and the commercial prospects for our products. Delays or termination of clinical trials that we conduct for our partners or customers may also harm our financial results as payments under these contracts may be delayed, reduced or curtailed.
Because revenues are concentrated, the loss of a significant customer would harm our business.
Historically, a substantial portion of our revenue has been derived from contracts with a limited number of significant customers. Our largest customer, Roche, accounted for approximately 43% of our consolidated revenue in 2003 and 32% and 33% of consolidated revenue in the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2004, respectively. Revenue under our alliance with Merck accounted for approximately 19% of consolidated revenue in 2003 and 17% and 18% of consolidated revenue in the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2004. Revenues under the joint development and commercialization agreement with ABG, which was terminated in the fourth quarter of 2002, accounted for 15% of consolidated revenue in the year ended December 31, 2002. The loss of any significant customer may significantly lower our revenues and affect our progression to profitability.
If we are not able to obtain sufficient additional funding to meet our capital requirements, we may be forced to reduce or terminate our research and product development programs.
We have spent substantial amounts of cash to fund our research and development activities and expect to continue to spend substantial amounts for these activities over the next several years. We expect to use cash to collect, generate and analyze genotypic and disease data from volunteers in our disease-gene research programs; to conduct drug discovery and development activities; to continue to develop database and healthcare informatics products; and to continue other research and development activities. Many factors will influence our future capital needs, including:
the number, breadth and progress of our discovery and research programs;
our ability to attract customers;
our ability to commercialize our discoveries and the resources we devote to commercialization;
the amount we spend to enforce patent claims and other intellectual property rights; and
the costs and timing of regulatory approvals.
We intend to rely on Roche, Merck and other existing and future collaborators for significant funding of our research efforts. In addition, we may seek additional funding through public or private equity offerings and debt financings. We may not be able to obtain
28
additional financing when we need it or the financing may not be on terms favorable to us or our stockholders. Stockholders ownership will be diluted if we raise additional capital by issuing equity securities.
If we raise additional funds through collaborations and licensing arrangements, we may have to relinquish rights to some of our technologies or product candidates, or grant licenses on unfavorable terms. If adequate funds are not available, we would have to scale back or terminate our discovery and research programs and product development.
The Icelandic parliament enacted legislation in 2002, authorizing the Minister of Finance to provide an Icelandic government guarantee of a convertible bond offering of up to $200 million by us for the purpose of financing our new activities in the area of drug development. To become effective, this legislation must be approved by the European Free Trade Association Surveillance Authority, or ESA, following a notification to ESA by the Minister of Finance. ESAs task is to ensure compatibility with the state aid stipulations of the agreement on the European Economic Area, to which Iceland is a signatory. The ESA began a formal investigation procedure with regard to the proposed state guarantee in 2003. Following completion of the sale of our 3.5% Senior Convertible Notes due 2011 in April, 2004, we advised the Minister of Finance that we did not intend to seek government guaranteed financing pursuant to this legislation. As a result, the Minister of Finance withdrew its notification of the proposed state aid to ESA, which subsequently terminated its review. At this time no action is being take to make the 2002 legislation effective, nor is it likely that such action will be taken in the future.
If we cannot successfully develop a marketing and sales force or maintain suitable arrangements with third parties to market and sell our products, our ability to deliver products may be impaired.
We currently have no experience in marketing or selling pharmaceutical products. In order to achieve commercial success for any approved product, we must either develop a marketing and sales force, which will require substantial additional funds and personnel, or, where appropriate or permissible, enter into arrangements with third parties to market and sell our products. We might not be successful in developing marketing and sales capabilities. Further, we may not be able to enter into marketing and sales agreements with others on acceptable terms, and any such arrangements, if entered into, may be terminated. If we develop our own marketing and sales capability, it will compete with other companies that currently have experienced, well-funded and larger marketing and sales operations. To the extent that we enter into co-promotion or other sales and marketing arrangements with other companies, revenues will depend on the efforts of others, which may not be successful.
If we cannot successfully form and maintain suitable arrangements with third parties for the manufacturing of the products we may develop, our ability to develop or deliver products may be impaired.
We have no experience in manufacturing products for commercial purposes and do not have manufacturing facilities. We must either develop such facilities, which will require substantial additional funds, or rely on contract manufacturers for the production of products for development and commercial purposes. The manufacture of our products for clinical trials and commercial purposes is subject to cGMP regulations promulgated by the FDA. In the event that we are unable to develop satisfactory manufacturing facilities or obtain or retain third-party manufacturing for our products, we will not be able to commercialize such products as planned. We may not be able to enter into agreements for the manufacture of future products with manufacturers whose facilities and procedures comply with cGMP and other regulatory requirements. Our current dependence upon others for the manufacture of our products may adversely affect our profit margin, if any, on the sale of future products and our ability to develop and deliver such products on a timely and competitive basis.
Our reliance on the Icelandic population may limit the applicability of our discoveries to certain populations.
The genetic make-up and prevalence of disease generally varies across populations around the world. Common complex diseases generally occur with a similar frequency in Iceland and other European populations. However, the populations of other nations may be genetically predisposed to certain diseases because of mutations not present in the Icelandic population. As a result, we and our partners may be unable to develop diagnostic and therapeutic products that are effective on all or a portion of people with such diseases. Any difference between the Icelandic population and other populations may have an effect on the usefulness of the Clinical Genome Miner in studying populations outside of Iceland. For our business to succeed, we must be able to apply discoveries that we make on the basis of the Icelandic population to other markets.
If we fail to protect confidential data adequately, we could incur a liability or lose the Icelandic Health Sector Database license.
Under laws and regulations in force in Iceland, including applicable European laws, directives and regulations, all information on individuals that is used in our population research is anonymized under the protocols and supervision of the Data Protection Authority of Iceland. If any of this data held or generated by us were to become personally identifiable, we would risk losing public support for participation in its research, and could be liable to legal action. Any failure to comply fully with all confidentiality requirements could lead to liability for damages incurred by individuals whose privacy is violated, the loss of our customers and reputation and the loss of
29
the goodwill and participation of the Icelandic population, including healthcare professionals. These eventualities could materially adversely affect our work in Iceland.
The same general privacy and data protection laws and regulations as well as specific laws and regulations apply to our license to build and operate the Icelandic Health Sector Database, or IHD. Were any data sent to or contained in the IHD to become personally identifiable, we would incur the same risks above and potentially lose our database license.
Some parts of our product development services create a risk of liability from clinical trial participants and the parties with whom we contract.
Through our wholly owned subsidiary Encode ehf., we conduct clinical trials of products we are developing and contract with drug companies to perform a wide range of services to assist them in bringing new drugs to market. Our services include:
supervising clinical trials;
data and laboratory analysis;
patient recruitment;
acting as investigators in conducting clinical trials; and
engaging in Phase I clinical trials.
If, in the course of these trials or activities,
we do not perform our services to contractual or regulatory standards;
we fail to obtain permission to conduct trials from the National Bioethics Committee of Iceland;
patients or volunteers suffer personal injury caused by or death from adverse reactions to the test drugs or otherwise;
there are deficiencies in the professional conduct of the investigators with whom we contract;
our laboratories inaccurately report or fail to report lab results; or
our informatics products violate rights of third parties,
then we could be held liable for these eventualities by the drug companies with whom we contract or by study participants. We maintain product liability insurance for claims arising from the use of products we are developing in clinical trials conducted by Encode and are covered by the product liability insurance of the drug companies for whom we provide clinical trial services for claims arising from the use of their products in such trials. Such insurance may be inadequate and in any event would not cover the risk of a customer deciding not to do business with us as a result of poor performance or claims for a customers financial loss as the result of our failure to perform our contractual obligations properly.
Use of therapeutic or diagnostic products developed as a result of our programs may result in product liability claims for which we have inadequate insurance.
The users of any therapeutic or diagnostic products developed by us or our collaborators as a result of our discovery or research programs or the use of our database or informatics products may bring product liability claims against us. Except as described above with respect to clinical trials conducted by Encode, we currently do not carry liability insurance to cover such claims. We are not certain that we, or our collaborators will be able to obtain such insurance or, if obtained, that sufficient coverage can be acquired at a reasonable cost. If we cannot protect against potential liability claims, we or our collaborators may find it difficult or impossible to commercialize products.
Increased leverage as a result of our convertible debt may harm our financial condition and results of operations.
At June 30, 2004, we have $207,949,000 of outstanding debt as reflected in our balance sheet. We may incur additional indebtedness in the future and the Notes do not restrict our future issuance of indebtedness. Our level of indebtedness will have several important effects on our future operations, including, without limitation:
a portion of our cash flow from operations will be dedicated to the payment of any interest required with respect to outstanding indebtedness;
increases in our outstanding indebtedness and leverage will increase our vulnerability to adverse changes in general economic and industry conditions, as well as to competitive pressure; and
depending on the levels of our outstanding debt, our ability to obtain additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures, general corporate and other purposes may be limited.
Our ability to make payments of principal and interest on our indebtedness depends upon our future performance, which will be subject to the success of our development and commercialization of new pharmaceutical products, general economic conditions,
30
industry cycles and financial, business and other factors affecting our operations, many of which are beyond our control. If we are not able to generate sufficient cash flow from operations in the future to service our debt, we may be required, among other things:
to seek additional financing in the debt or equity markets;
to refinance or restructure all or a portion of our indebtedness, including the Notes;
to sell selected assets; or
to reduce or delay planned expenditures on clinical trials, and development and commercialization activities.
Such measures might not be sufficient to enable us to service our debt. In addition, any such financing, refinancing or sale of assets might not be available on economically favorable terms.
We may be unable to hire and retain the key personnel upon whom our success depends.
We depend on the principal members of our management and scientific staff, including Dr. Kari Stefansson, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer. We have not entered into agreements with any of these people that bind them to a specific period of employment. If any of these people leaves, our ability to conduct our operations may be negatively affected. Our future success also will depend in part on our ability to attract, hire and retain additional personnel. There is intense competition for such qualified personnel and we cannot be certain that we will be able to continue to attract and retain such personnel. Failure to attract and retain key personnel could have a material adverse effect on us.
Currency fluctuations may negatively affect our financial condition.
We publish our consolidated financial statements in U.S. dollars. Currency fluctuations can affect our financial results because a portion of our cash reserves and our operating costs are in Icelandic kronas. A fluctuation of the exchange rates of the Icelandic krona against the U.S. dollar can thus adversely affect the buying power of our cash reserves and revenues. Most of our long-term liabilities are U.S. dollar denominated. However, we may enter into hedging transactions if we have substantial foreign currency exposure in the future. We may have increased exposure as a result of investments or payments from collaborative partners.
Our contracts may terminate upon short notice.
Many of our contracts for research services are terminable on short notice. This means that our contracts could be terminated for numerous reasons, any of which may be beyond our control such as a reduction or reallocation of a customers research and development budget or a change in a customers overall financial condition. The loss of a large contract or multiple smaller contracts, or a significant decrease in revenue derived from a contract, could significantly reduce our profitability and require us to reallocate under-utilized physical and professional resources.
We may not be able to form and maintain the collaborative relationships that our business strategy requires and the relationships may lead to disputes over technology rights.
Our ability to generate revenue growth and become profitable is dependent, in part, upon our ability to enter into additional collaborative arrangements, and upon our ability and that of our collaborative partners to successfully commercialize products incorporating, or based upon, our work.
We must form research collaborations and licensing arrangements with several partners at the same time in order to execute our business strategy. We currently have a number of collaborative relationships and only three substantial collaborative relationships, including two with Roche. To succeed, we will have to maintain or expand these relationships and establish additional collaborations. There can be no assurance that we will be able to maintain or expand our existing collaborations, enter into future collaborations to develop applications based on existing or future research agreements, sign additional subscribers to our database services, or successfully expand our medicinal chemistry or pharmacogenomics businesses.
If our collaborations are not successful or if we are not able to manage multiple collaborations successfully, our programs will suffer. If we increase the number of collaborations, it will become more difficult to manage the various collaborations successfully and the potential for conflicts among the collaborators as to rights to the technology and products generated under work conducted with us will increase.
31
Dependence on collaborative relationships may lead to delays in product development, product defects and disputes over rights to technology.
We depend on collaborators for the pre-clinical study and clinical development of therapeutic and diagnostic products and for regulatory approval, manufacturing and marketing of any products that result from our technology. Our agreements with collaborators typically allow them significant discretion in electing whether to pursue such activities. We cannot control the amount and timing of resources collaborators will devote to our programs or potential products.
In addition, our arrangements may place responsibility for key aspects of information technology, product development and marketing on our collaborative partners. If our collaborators fail to perform their obligations, our information technology products could contain erroneous data, design defects, viruses or software defects that are difficult to detect and correct and may adversely affect our revenues and the market acceptance of our products.
Our collaborators may stop supporting our products or providing services to us if they develop or obtain rights to competing products. Disputes may arise in the future over the ownership of rights to any technology developed with collaborators. These and other possible disagreements between our collaborators and us could lead to delays in the collaborative research, development or commercialization of products. Such disagreements could also result in litigation or require arbitration to resolve.
Concerns regarding the use of genetic testing results may limit the commercial viability of any products we develop.
Other companies have developed genetic predisposition tests that have raised ethical concerns. It is possible that employers or others could discriminate against people who have a genetic predisposition to certain diseases. Concern regarding possible discrimination may result in governmental authorities enacting restrictions or bans on the use of all, or certain types of, genetic testing. Similarly, such concerns may lead individuals to refuse to use genetic tests even if permissible. These factors may limit the market for, and therefore the commercial viability of, products that our collaborators and/or we may develop.
We may not be able to compete successfully with other companies and government agencies in the development and marketing of product services.
A number of companies are attempting to rapidly identify and patent genes that cause diseases or an increased susceptibility to diseases. Competition in this field and our other areas of business, including drug discovery and development as well as database services and healthcare informatics, is intense and is expected to increase. We have numerous competitors, including major pharmaceutical and diagnostic companies, specialized biotechnology firms, universities and other research institutions, and other government-sponsored entities and companies providing healthcare information products. Our collaborators, including Roche and Merck, may also compete with us. Many of our competitors, either alone or with collaborators, have considerably greater capital resources, research and development staffs and facilities, and technical and other resources than we do, which may allow them to discover important genes before we do. We believe that a number of our competitors are developing competing products and services that may be commercially successful and that are further advanced in development than our potential products and services. To succeed, we, together with our collaborators, must discover disease-predisposing genes, characterize their functions, develop genetic tests or therapeutic products and related information services based on such discoveries, obtain regulatory and other approvals, and launch such services or products before competitors. Even if we or our collaborators are successful in developing effective products or services, our products and services may not successfully compete with those of our competitors. Our competitors may succeed in developing and marketing products and services that are more effective than ours or that are marketed before ours.
Competitors have established, and in the future may establish, patent positions with respect to gene sequences related to our research projects. Such patent positions or the public availability of gene sequences comprising substantial portions of the human genome could decrease the potential value of our research projects and make it more difficult for us to compete. We may also face competition from other entities in gaining access to DNA samples used for research and development purposes. Our competitors may also obtain patent protection or other intellectual property rights that could limit our rights, or our customers ability, to use our technologies or databases, or commercialize therapeutic or diagnostics products. In addition, we face, and will continue to face, intense competition from other companies for collaborative arrangements with pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, for establishing relationships with academic and research institutions and for licenses to proprietary technology.
We expect competition to intensify as technical advances are made and become more widely known. Our future success will depend in large part on maintaining a competitive position in the genomic field. Others or our rapid technological development may result in products or technologies becoming obsolete before we recover the expenses we incur in developing them.
Our ability to compete successfully will depend, in part, on our ability, and that of our collaborators, to:
develop proprietary products;
develop and maintain products that reach the market first, and are technologically superior to, and more cost effective than, other products on the market;
obtain patent or other proprietary protection for our products and technologies;
32
attract and retain scientific and product development personnel;
obtain required regulatory approvals; and
manufacture, market and sell products that we develop.
Changes in outsourcing trends and economic conditions in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries could adversely affect our growth.
Economic factors and industry trends that affect our primary customers, pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, also affect our business. For example, the practice of many companies in these industries has been to outsource to organizations like us the conduct of genetic research, clinical research, sales and marketing projects and chemistry research and development projects. If these industries reduce their present tendency to outsource those projects, our operations, financial condition and growth rate could be materially and adversely affected. These alliances and arrangements are both time consuming and complex and we face substantial competition in establishing these relationships. In addition, our ability to generate new business could be impaired by general economic downturns in our customers industries. We have experienced increasing pressure on the part of our customers to reduce expenses, including the use of our services as a result of negative economic trends generally and in the pharmaceutical industry. If pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies discontinue or decrease their usage of our services, including as a result of the slowdown in the overall U.S. economy, our revenues and earnings could be lower than we expect and our revenues may decrease or not grow at historical rates.
If regulatory approvals for products resulting from our gene discovery programs are not obtained, we will not be able to derive revenues from these products.
Government agencies must approve new drugs and diagnostic products in the countries in which they are to be marketed. We cannot be certain that we can obtain regulatory approval for any drugs or diagnostic products resulting from our gene discovery programs. The regulatory process can take many years and require substantial resources. Because some of the products likely to result from our disease research programs involve the application of new technologies and may be based upon a new therapeutic approach, various government regulatory authorities may subject such products to substantial additional review. As a result, these authorities may grant regulatory approvals for these products more slowly than for products using more conventional technologies. Furthermore, regulatory approval may impose limitations on the use of a drug or diagnostic product.
After initial regulatory approval, a marketed product and its manufacturer must undergo continuing review. Discovery of previously unknown problems with a product may have adverse effects on our business, financial condition and results of operations, including withdrawal of the product from the market.
Our success will depend, in part, on the development and marketing of products based upon our research and development. Strict regulatory controls on the clinical testing, manufacture, labeling, supply and marketing of the products will influence our and our partners ability to successfully manufacture and market therapeutic or diagnostic products. Most countries require a company to obtain and maintain regulatory approval for a product from the relevant regulatory authority to enable the product to be marketed. Obtaining regulatory approval and complying with appropriate statutes and regulations is time-consuming and requires the expenditure of substantial resources.
Most European countries and the United States have very high standards of technical appraisal and consequently, in most cases, a lengthy approval process for pharmaceutical products. The regulatory approval processes, which usually include pre-clinical and clinical studies, as well as post-marketing surveillance to establish a compounds safety and efficacy, can take many years and require the expenditure of substantial resources. Data obtained from such studies is susceptible to varying interpretations that could delay, limit or prevent regulatory approval. Delays or rejections may also be encountered based upon changes in drug approval policies in applicable jurisdictions. There can be no assurance that we or our collaborative customers will obtain regulatory approval for any drugs or diagnostic products developed as the result of our gene discovery programs.
Efforts to reduce healthcare costs may reduce market acceptance of our products.
Our success will depend in part on the price and extent to which we will be paid for our products by government and health administration authorities, private health insurers and other third party payors. Reimbursement for newly approved healthcare products is uncertain. Third party payors, including Medicare in the United States, are increasingly challenging the prices charged for medical products and services. They are increasingly attempting to contain healthcare costs by limiting both coverage and the level of reimbursement for new therapeutic products. We cannot be certain that any third party insurance coverage will be available to patients for any products we discover or develop. If third party payors do not provide adequate coverage and reimbursement levels for our products, the market acceptance of these products may be materially reduced.
33
Numerous governments have undertaken efforts to control growing healthcare costs through legislation, regulation and voluntary agreements with medical care providers and pharmaceutical companies. If cost containment efforts limit the profits that can be derived from new drugs, our customers may reduce their research and development spending which could reduce the business they outsource to us.
Our operations involve a risk of injury or damage from hazardous materials, and if an accident were to occur, we could be subject to costly and damaging liability claims, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our research and development activities involve the controlled use of hazardous materials and chemicals. Although we believe that our safety procedures for handling and disposing of hazardous materials comply with the standards prescribed by applicable governmental regulations, the risk of accidental contamination or injury from these materials cannot be completely eliminated. In the event of an accident, we could be held liable for any damages or fines that result. Such liability could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and liquidity.
We may not be able to protect the proprietary rights that are critical to our success.
Our success will depend in part on our ability to protect our genealogy database and genotypic data and any other proprietary databases that we develop and our proprietary software and other proprietary methods and technologies. Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights, unauthorized parties may be able to obtain and use information that we regard as proprietary. Our commercial success will depend in part on obtaining patent protection. The patent positions of pharmaceutical, biopharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, including deCODE, are generally uncertain and involve complex legal and factual considerations. We cannot be sure that:
any of our pending patent applications will result in issued patents;
that we will develop additional proprietary technologies that are patentable;
that any patents issued to us or our partners will provide a basis for commercially viable products, will provide us with any competitive advantages or will not be challenged by third parties; or
that the patents of others will not have an adverse effect on our ability to do business.
If we are unable to obtain patent protection for our technology or discoveries, the value of our proprietary resources will be adversely affected.
In addition, patent law relating to the scope of claims in the area of genetics and gene discovery is still evolving. There is substantial uncertainty regarding the patentability of genes or gene fragments without known functions. The laws of some European countries provide that genes and gene fragments may not be patented. The European Commission has passed a directive that prevents the patenting of genes in their natural state. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office initially rejected a patent application by the National Institutes of Health on partial genes. Accordingly, the degree of future protection for our proprietary rights is uncertain and, we cannot predict the breadth of claims allowed in any patents issued to us or others. We could also incur substantial costs in litigation if we are required to defend ourselves in patent suits brought by third parties or if we initiate such suits.
Others may have filed and in the future are likely to file patent applications covering genes or gene products that are similar or identical to our products. We cannot be certain that our patent applications will have priority over any patent applications of others. The mere issuance of a patent does not guarantee that it is valid or enforceable; thus even if we are holding or are granted patents, we cannot be sure that they would be valid and enforceable against third parties. Further, a patent does not provide the patent holder with freedom to operate in a way that infringes the patent rights of others. Any legal action against us or our partners claiming damages and seeking to enjoin commercial activities relating to the affected products and processes could, in addition to subjecting us to potential liability for damages, require us or our partners to obtain a license in order to continue to manufacture or market the affected products and processes. There can be no assurance that we or our partners would prevail in any action or that any license required under any patent would be made available on commercially acceptable terms, if at all. If licenses are not available, we or our partners may be required to cease marketing our products or practicing our methods.
If expressed sequence tags, single nucleotide polymorphisms, or SNPs, or other sequence information become publicly available before we apply for patent protection on a corresponding full-length or partial gene, our ability to obtain patent protection for those genes or gene sequences could be adversely affected. In addition, other parties are attempting to rapidly identify and characterize genes through the use of gene expression analysis and other technologies. If any patents are issued to other parties on these partial or full-length genes or gene products or uses for such genes or gene products, the risk increases that the sale of our or our collaborators potential products or processes may give rise to claims of patent infringement. The amount of supportive data required for issuance of
34
patents for human therapeutics is highly uncertain. If more data than we have available is required, our ability to obtain patent protection could be delayed or otherwise adversely affected. Even with supportive data, the ability to obtain patents is uncertain in view of evolving examination guidelines, such as the utility and written description guidelines that the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has adopted.
While we require employees, academic collaborators and consultants to enter into confidentiality agreements, there can be no assurance that proprietary information will not be disclosed, that others will not independently develop substantially equivalent proprietary information and techniques, otherwise gain access to our trade secrets or disclose such technology, or that we can meaningfully protect our trade secrets.
Our patent protection for DG031 may provide protection for only a limited term.
The patents we licensed from Bayer for DG031 expire in 2009 and 2012. While we will seek to obtain one or more use patents protecting our proprietary rights to this compound for a longer period, we cannot be certain that we will obtain such patents or that they will adequately protect us. In addition, although we may seek to extend the term of one of the patents we licensed from Bayer and to obtain marketing exclusivity under the Hatch-Waxman Act, we cannot be certain that we will be successful. If we cannot obtain new patents or extend the term of patent protection under one of the patents we licensed from Bayer, the amount of revenues that we will be able to derive from an approved product based on these patents may be adversely affected.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The primary objective of our investment activities is to preserve principal while maximizing income we receive from our investments without significantly increasing risk. Some of the securities in our investment portfolio may be subject to market risk. This means that a change in prevailing interest rates may cause the market value of the investment to fluctuate. For example, if we hold a security that was issued with a fixed interest rate at the then-prevailing rate and the prevailing interest rate later rises, the market value of our investment will probably decline. To minimize this risk in the future, we intend to maintain our portfolio of cash equivalents and short-term investments in a variety of securities, including commercial paper, money market funds and government and non-government debt securities. In general, money market funds and bank deposits are not subject to market risk because the interest paid on such funds fluctuates with the prevailing interest rate. As of June 30, 2004, all of our cash and cash equivalents were money market preferred securities, money market, bank deposit and checking accounts.
We are exposed to market risks from changes in foreign currency exchange rates, interest rates and investment prices. These changes may adversely affect our operating results and financial condition. We seek to manage these risks through regular operating and financing activities and, when deemed appropriate, through the use of derivative financial instruments. We control and manage foreign exchange risk, interest rate risk, and investment price risk by continually monitoring changes in key economic indicators and market information.
As a consequence of the nature our business and operations our reported financial results and cash flows are exposed to the risks associated with fluctuations in the exchange rates of the U.S. dollar, the Icelandic krona and other world currencies. We continue to monitor our exposure to currency risk but have not yet purchased instruments to hedge these general risks through the use of derivative financial instruments.
We hold various interest rate sensitive assets and liabilities to manage the liquidity and cash needs of our day-to-day operations. As a result, we are exposed to risks due to changes in interest rates. In order to mitigate risks associated with interest rate sensitive liabilities we use interest rate derivative instruments, such as cross currency interest rate swaps, and may in future use other instruments to achieve the desired interest rate maturities and asset/liability structures.
We are exposed to credit (or repayment) risk, as well as market risk from the use of derivative instruments. If the counterparty fails to fulfill its performance obligations under a derivative contract, our credit risk will equal the positive market value in a derivative. Consequently, when the fair market value of a derivative contract is positive, this indicates that the counterparty owes us, thus creating a repayment risk for us. When the fair market value of a derivative contract is negative, we owe the counterparty and therefore, assume no repayment risk.
In order to minimize the credit risk in derivative instruments, we enter into transactions with high quality counterparties such as financial institutions that satisfy our established credit approval criteria. We review the credit ratings of such counterparties on a regular basis.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. Our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer evaluated the effectiveness of deCODEs disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of
35
1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)) as of the end of the fiscal quarter covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer have concluded that as of the end of such fiscal quarter, deCODEs current disclosure controls and procedures are adequate and effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports deCODE files under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported on a timely basis.
(b) Changes in internal controls. There was no change in deCODEs internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during fiscal quarter covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, deCODEs internal controls over financial reporting.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
There has been no change in the matters reported in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.
ITEM 2. CHANGES IN SECURITIES, USE OF PROCEEDS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.
On April 14, 2004, we issued $150,000,000 principal amount of our 3.5% Senior Convertible Notes due 2011 (the Notes) to Lehman Brothers Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., Piper Jaffray & Co., Deutsche Bank Securities and ThinkEquity Partners LLC (the Initial Purchasers) for a price of 96.5% of the principal amount of the Notes, or $144,750,000. The Initial Purchasers resold a portion of the Notes to certain qualified institutional buyers pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Act).
The offer and sale of the Notes to the Initial Purchasers were exempt from registration under the Act pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Act as a transaction not involving a public offering because of the nature of the purchasers and the circumstances of the offering. The Initial Purchasers resold a portion of the Notes in reliance on Rule 144A under the Act. Each Initial Purchaser made representations to us as to its compliance with Rule 144A. In addition, appropriate legends restricting transfer were affixed to the Notes.
The Notes are convertible at any time through maturity into shares of our common stock, at the option of the holder, at a price of $14.00 per share, which is equivalent to an initial conversion rate of approximately 71.43 shares per $1,000 principal amount of the Notes.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
The following is a list of exhibits filed as part of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
EXHIBIT |
|
DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBIT |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as further amended (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 and Exhibit 3.3 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-31984) which became effective on July 17, 2000). |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
Certificate of Amendment to Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation dated August 30, 2002 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 14, 2002). |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
Bylaws, as amended (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-31984) which became effective on July 17, 2000). |
36
4.1 |
|
Indenture dated as of April 14, 2004 between deCODE genetics, Inc. and The Bank of New York (including form of 3.5% Senior Convertible Note due 2011). (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-116543) which was filed on June 16, 2004). |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
Registration Rights Agreement dated as of April 14, 2004 between deCODE genetics, Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. and Lehman Brothers Inc., as representatives of the Initial Purchasers. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.9 to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 10, 2004). |
|
|
|
10.1* |
|
Agreement on Termination of Employment between deCODE genetics, Inc. and Hannes Smarason dated June 18, 2004. |
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
* Constitutes a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
Note: Unless otherwise noted, the SEC File number of each of the above referenced documents is 000-30469.
On May 5, 2004, deCODE filed a Current Report on Form 8-K furnishing financial information regarding the results of operations and financial condition for the quarter ended March 31, 2004.
On June 29, 2004, deCODE filed a Current Report on Form 8-K reporting (i) that Hannes Smarason, Executive Vice President and Senior Business Officer, would be leaving deCODE and (ii) the completion of enrollment for its Phase IIa clinical trial of DG031.
37
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Dated: August 6, 2004
deCODE genetics, Inc.
|
/s/ Kari Stefansson |
|
|
Kari Stefansson |
|
||
Chairman, President, |
|
||
and Chief Executive Officer |
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
/s/ Lance Thibault |
|
|
Lance Thibault |
|
||
Chief Financial Officer and |
|
||
Treasurer (principal financial |
|
||
officer and principal accounting officer) |
|
||
38
EXHIBIT |
|
DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBIT |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as further amended (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 and Exhibit 3.3 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-31984) which became effective on July 17, 2000). |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
Certificate of Amendment to Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation dated August 30, 2002 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 14, 2002). |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
Bylaws, as amended (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-31984) which became effective on July 17, 2000). |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
Indenture dated as of April 14, 2004 between deCODE genetics, Inc. and The Bank of New York (including form of 3.5% Senior Convertible Note due 2011). (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-116543) which was filed on June 16, 2004). |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
Registration Rights Agreement dated as of April 14, 2004 between deCODE genetics, Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. and Lehman Brothers Inc., as representatives of the Initial Purchasers. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.9 to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 10, 2004). |
|
|
|
10.1* |
|
Agreement on Termination of Employment between deCODE genetics, Inc. and Hannes Smarason dated June 18, 2004. |
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley |
39
|
|
Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
* Constitutes a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
Note: Unless otherwise noted, the SEC File number of each of the above referenced documents is 000-30469.
40