UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
ý |
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
|
For the quarter ended March 31, 2004 |
|
|
|
OR |
|
|
o |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
|
For the transition period from to |
Commission File Number 000-1095478
INTERWAVE COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL LTD.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
BERMUDA |
|
98-0155633 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
CLARENDON HOUSE, |
|
NOT APPLICABLE |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
(Zip code) |
|
|
|
(441) 295-5950 |
||
(Registrants telephone number including area code) |
||
|
||
NOT APPLICABLE |
||
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report.) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No ý
As of May 5, 2004, 9,019,569 common shares, par value $0.01 per share, of the registrant were outstanding.
INTERWAVE COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX
PART IFINANCIAL INFORMATION |
|
Item 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements |
|
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2004 and June 30, 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
|
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
INTERWAVE COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share amounts)
|
|
March 31, 2004 |
|
June 30, 2003 |
|
||
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
||||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
7,218 |
|
$ |
4,371 |
|
Restricted cash, short term portion |
|
183 |
|
107 |
|
||
Trade receivables, net of allowance of $924 and $2,403 as of March 31, 2004 and June 30, 2003, respectively |
|
5,848 |
|
5,959 |
|
||
Trade receivables from related parties |
|
692 |
|
625 |
|
||
Inventories, net |
|
7,477 |
|
8,058 |
|
||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
1,982 |
|
2,421 |
|
||
Total current assets |
|
23,400 |
|
21,541 |
|
||
Property and equipment, net |
|
3,008 |
|
4,321 |
|
||
Intangibles, net |
|
6,421 |
|
7,150 |
|
||
Restricted cash, long term portion |
|
103 |
|
147 |
|
||
Other assets |
|
11 |
|
118 |
|
||
Total assets |
|
$ |
32,943 |
|
$ |
33,277 |
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Short-term borrowings |
|
$ |
2,500 |
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
6,473 |
|
5,324 |
|
||
Accrued expenses |
|
2,599 |
|
3,526 |
|
||
License payable |
|
1,287 |
|
2,166 |
|
||
Accrued compensation |
|
1,555 |
|
2,193 |
|
||
Income taxes payable |
|
404 |
|
417 |
|
||
Accrued restructuring expenses |
|
1,279 |
|
1,915 |
|
||
Deferred revenue |
|
320 |
|
1,939 |
|
||
Deferred revenue from related parties |
|
94 |
|
141 |
|
||
Advance customer payments |
|
4,824 |
|
1,567 |
|
||
Current portion of notes and leases payable |
|
455 |
|
786 |
|
||
Total current liabilities |
|
21,790 |
|
20,974 |
|
||
Capital lease obligations, long term portion |
|
|
|
306 |
|
||
Other long term liabilities |
|
1,039 |
|
1,978 |
|
||
Total liabilities |
|
22,829 |
|
23,258 |
|
||
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Common shares, $0.01 par value; 20,000,000 authorized; 8,982,582 and 6,755,177 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2004 and June 30, 2003, respectively |
|
89 |
|
67 |
|
||
Additional paid-in capital |
|
343,811 |
|
338,225 |
|
||
Receivable from shareholders |
|
(178 |
) |
(456 |
) |
||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
(1,087 |
) |
(906 |
) |
||
Accumulated deficit |
|
(332,521 |
) |
(326,911 |
) |
||
Total shareholders equity |
|
10,114 |
|
10,019 |
|
||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
32,943 |
|
$ |
33,277 |
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
3
INTERWAVE COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
Three
Months Ended |
|
Nine
Months Ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||||
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
(unaudited) |
|
||||||||
Net revenues |
|
$ |
9,710 |
|
$ |
6,580 |
|
$ |
30,882 |
|
$ |
21,485 |
|
Cost of revenues |
|
4,633 |
|
4,929 |
|
16,075 |
|
17,600 |
|
||||
Gross profit |
|
5,077 |
|
1,651 |
|
14,807 |
|
3,885 |
|
||||
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Research and development |
|
2,281 |
|
3,253 |
|
6,856 |
|
10,948 |
|
||||
Selling, general and administrative |
|
4,003 |
|
3,933 |
|
13,770 |
|
15,150 |
|
||||
Amortization of deferred stock compensation |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
194 |
|
||||
Gains on asset sales |
|
|
|
(332 |
) |
(809 |
) |
(227 |
) |
||||
Restructuring charges |
|
4 |
|
79 |
|
436 |
|
715 |
|
||||
Total operating expenses |
|
6,288 |
|
7,012 |
|
20,253 |
|
26,780 |
|
||||
Loss from operations |
|
(1,211 |
) |
(5,361 |
) |
(5,446 |
) |
(22,895 |
) |
||||
Interest income |
|
3 |
|
22 |
|
3 |
|
149 |
|
||||
Interest expense |
|
(14 |
) |
(66 |
) |
(87 |
) |
(67 |
) |
||||
Other expenses, net |
|
41 |
|
85 |
|
(137 |
) |
59 |
|
||||
Loss before income taxes |
|
(1,181 |
) |
(5,320 |
) |
(5,667 |
) |
(22,754 |
) |
||||
Income tax benefit (expense) |
|
61 |
|
(139 |
) |
57 |
|
(356 |
) |
||||
Net loss |
|
$ |
(1,120 |
) |
$ |
(5,459 |
) |
$ |
(5,610 |
) |
$ |
(23,110 |
) |
Basic and diluted net loss per share |
|
$ |
(0.13 |
) |
$ |
(0.81 |
) |
$ |
(0.74 |
) |
$ |
(3.59 |
) |
Shares used in computing basic and diluted net loss per share |
|
8,342 |
|
6,733 |
|
7,550 |
|
6,429 |
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
4
INTERWAVE COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL LTD AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
|
|
Nine Months Ended March 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
||||
Net loss |
|
$ |
(5,610 |
) |
$ |
(23,110 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
2,987 |
|
3,969 |
|
||
Amortization of deferred stock compensation |
|
|
|
194 |
|
||
Compensation expense related to issuance of stock and warrants |
|
135 |
|
320 |
|
||
Compensation expense related to issuance of contingent consideration |
|
134 |
|
786 |
|
||
Gains on asset sales |
|
(809 |
) |
(227 |
) |
||
Provision for bad debts |
|
644 |
|
(400 |
) |
||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Restricted cash |
|
(32 |
) |
1,427 |
|
||
Trade receivables |
|
(600 |
) |
5,702 |
|
||
Inventories |
|
581 |
|
3,972 |
|
||
Accounts payable |
|
1,124 |
|
(2,865 |
) |
||
Accrued and other liabilities |
|
(191 |
) |
(1,976 |
) |
||
Deferred revenue |
|
(1,666 |
) |
(168 |
) |
||
Advance license payment |
|
|
|
400 |
|
||
Other assets and long-term liabilities |
|
224 |
|
570 |
|
||
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
(3,079 |
) |
(11,406 |
) |
||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Sale of investments |
|
80 |
|
2,849 |
|
||
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
(285 |
) |
(767 |
) |
||
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities |
|
(205 |
) |
2,082 |
|
||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Principal receipts from notes receivable |
|
|
|
82 |
|
||
Principal payments on notes payable and capital lease obligations |
|
(1,545 |
) |
|
|
||
Proceeds from short-term borrowings |
|
2,500 |
|
|
|
||
Proceeds from issuance of common shares and other |
|
5,357 |
|
3,000 |
|
||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
6,312 |
|
3,082 |
|
||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
(181 |
) |
(443 |
) |
||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
2,847 |
|
(6,685 |
) |
||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
4,371 |
|
11,403 |
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period |
|
$ |
7,218 |
|
$ |
4,718 |
|
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash paid for interest |
|
$ |
102 |
|
$ |
2 |
|
Cash paid for taxes |
|
$ |
70 |
|
$ |
216 |
|
Non-cash investing and financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Common shares issued for acquisitions |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
6,337 |
|
Warrants issued to third parties |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
320 |
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
5
INTERWAVE COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial statements are unaudited, but in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary to fairly state the Companys consolidated financial position, results of operations, and cash flows as of and for the dates and periods presented. The condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information, the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X of the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Companys audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 29, 2003. Certain prior period balances have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. The results of operations for the three-month and nine-month periods ended March 31, 2004 are not necessarily indicative of results for the entire fiscal year ending June 30, 2004 or any other period.
The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All common share numbers disclosed in this Form 10-Q have been retroactively adjusted to account for the 1-for-10 reverse stock split, which took effect on April 30, 2003.
The condensed consolidated financial statements contemplate the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has had recurring net losses, including net losses of $5.6 million and $23.1 million for the nine-month periods ended March 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, and the Company also had net cash used in operations of $3.1 million and $11.4 million for the nine-month periods ended March 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Management is currently executing plans intended to increase revenues and margins, reduce costs and raise additional amounts of cash through the issuance of debt, equity, asset sales or through other means such as customer prepayments. If additional funds are raised through the issuance of preferred equity or debt securities, these securities could have rights, preferences and privileges senior to holders of common shares, and the terms of any debt could impose restrictions on our operations. The sale of additional equity or convertible debt securities also could result in dilution to the Companys shareholders, and the Company may not be able to obtain additional financing on acceptable terms, if at all. If the Company is unable to successfully execute such plans, it may be required to reduce the scope of its planned operations or even cease its operations.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
2. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUCEMENTS
In January 2003, the Emerging Issues Task Force released Issue No. 00-21 (EITF 00-21), Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables, which addresses certain aspects of accounting for revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables. Specifically, EITF 00-21 addresses whether an arrangement contains more than one unit of accounting and the measurement and allocation to the separate units of accounting in the arrangement. EITF 00-21 is effective for revenue arrangements entered into in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2003. Application of EITF 00-21 did not materially impact the Companys results.
In December 2003, the Securities and Exchange Commission released Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, Revenue Recognition (SAB 104). SAB 104 revises or rescinds portions of the interpretative guidance related to revenue recognition included in Topic 13 of the codification of the staff accounting bulletins. The Company has assessed the impact of SAB 104 and concluded that the adoption of SAB 104 by the Company did not have a material impact on its condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
In January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Interpretation No. 46 (FIN 46), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an Interpretation of ARB No. 51, which addresses how a business enterprise should evaluate whether it has a controlling interest in an entity through means other than voting rights and accordingly should consolidate the entity. FIN 46R, which was issued in December 2003, replaces FIN 46. Before concluding that it is appropriate to apply ARB 51 voting interest consolidation model to an entity, an enterprise must first determine that the entity is not a variable interest entity (VIE). As of the effective date of FIN 46R, an enterprise must evaluate its involvement with all entities or legal structures created before February 1, 2003, to determine whether consolidation requirements of FIN 46R apply to those entities there is no grand-fathering of existing entities. Public companies must apply either FIN 46 or FIN 46R immediately to entities created after January 31, 2003, no later than the end of the first reporting period that ends after December 15, 2003 to entities considered to be special purpose entities and no later than the first reporting period that ends after March 15, 2004 for all other entities. The Company had no variable interest entities as of March 31, 2004.
In April 2003, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 149 (SFAS No. 149), Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. SFAS No. 149 amends and clarifies financial accounting and reporting for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts and for hedging activities under SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. SFAS No. 149 provides greater clarification of the characteristics of a derivative instrument so that contracts with similar characteristics will be accounted for consistently. In general, SFAS No. 149 is effective for contracts entered into or modified after September 30, 2003, and for hedging relationships designated after September 30, 2003. As the Company did not have any derivative financial instruments, the adoption of SFAS No. 149 did not have an impact on the Companys condensed consolidated financial statements.
In May 2003, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 150 (SFAS No. 150), Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity. SFAS No. 150 clarifies the accounting for certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity and requires that those instruments be classified as liabilities in statements of financial position. Previously, many of those financial instruments were classified as equity. SFAS No. 150 is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003 and otherwise is effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. As the Company does not have any of these financial instruments, the adoption of SFAS No. 150 did not have an impact on the Companys condensed consolidated financial statements.
3. STOCK BASED COMPENSATION
The Company accounts for stock-based employee compensation using the intrinsic value method under Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 (APB 25), Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations, whereby the difference between the exercise price and the fair value at the date of grant is recognized as compensation expense, and complies with the disclosure provisions of Statement of Accounting Standards No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, Transition and Disclosure an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 123. The following table illustrates the effect on net loss and net loss per common share if the Company had applied the fair market recognition provisions of SFAS 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, to stock-based employee compensation.
7
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
Nine Months Ended March 31, |
|
||||||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||||
Net loss |
|
$ |
(1,120 |
) |
$ |
(5,459 |
) |
$ |
(5,610 |
) |
$ |
(23,110 |
) |
Add: Stock-based employee compensation expense included in the reported loss, net of tax effect |
|
38 |
|
79 |
|
38 |
|
194 |
|
||||
Less: Stock-based employee compensation expense using the fair value based method, net of tax effect |
|
(353 |
) |
(249 |
) |
(883 |
) |
(1,378 |
) |
||||
Pro forma net loss |
|
$ |
(1,435 |
) |
$ |
(5,629 |
) |
$ |
(6,455 |
) |
(24,294 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net loss per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
As reported |
|
$ |
(0.13 |
) |
$ |
(0.81 |
) |
$ |
(0.74 |
) |
$ |
(3.59 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Pro forma |
|
$ |
(0.17 |
) |
$ |
(0.84 |
) |
$ |
(0.85 |
) |
$ |
(3.78 |
) |
The fair value of options granted was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with weighted-average assumptions used for grants in 2004 and 2003, which are presented below. Assumptions related to the Employee Share Purchase Plan are not presented as the related compensation expense amounts are insignificant.
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
Nine Months Ended March 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
Weighted average risk-free rate |
|
1.01 |
% |
1.50 |
% |
1.01 |
% |
1.50 |
% |
Expected life (years) |
|
3.60 |
|
4.30 |
|
3.60 |
|
4.30 |
|
Volatility |
|
100 |
% |
199 |
% |
98 |
% |
199 |
% |
Dividend yield |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the three-month periods ended March 31, 2004 and 2003, the Company granted options with a weighted-average fair value of approximately $5.23 and $1.89, respectively. During the nine-month periods ended March 31, 2004 and 2003, the Company granted options with a weighted-average fair value of approximately $3.33 and $4.81, respectively.
Warrants issued for goods or services are valued at the fair value of the equity instrument or the goods or services received, whichever is more readily determinable.
4. COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
Comprehensive loss includes all changes in equity (net assets) during a period from non-owner sources. Accumulated other comprehensive loss, as presented on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets, consists of the cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment.
The components of the Companys total comprehensive loss were (in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
Nine Months Ended March 31, |
|
||||||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||||
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
(unaudited) |
|
||||||||
Net loss |
|
$ |
(1,120 |
) |
$ |
(5,459 |
) |
$ |
(5,610 |
) |
$ |
(23,110 |
) |
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
(175 |
) |
106 |
|
(181 |
) |
(443 |
) |
||||
Total comprehensive loss |
|
$ |
(1,295 |
) |
$ |
(5,353 |
) |
$ |
(5,791 |
) |
$ |
(23,553 |
) |
5. BASIC AND DILUTED NET LOSS PER SHARE
Basic and diluted net loss per share is calculated in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, Earnings Per Share. The denominator used in the computation of basic net loss per share is the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the respective periods. Diluted net loss per share would give effect to the dilutive effect of potential common shares, such as stock options and warrants. Warrants to purchase 0.6 million and 0.3 million shares of common stock and options to purchase 1.3 million and 0.9 million shares of common stock were outstanding at March 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, but were not included in the computation of diluted net loss per share as the effect would be anti-dilutive.
8
6. CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH
Cash and cash equivalents consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
March 31, 2004 |
|
June 30, 2003 |
|
||
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash |
|
$ |
7,207 |
|
$ |
4,015 |
|
Money market funds |
|
11 |
|
356 |
|
||
|
|
$ |
7,218 |
|
$ |
4,371 |
|
As of March 31, 2004 and June 30, 2003, $0.2 million and $0.1 million, respectively, related to a customer bank guarantee, which was classified as restricted cash, short-term portion.
7. INVENTORIES, NET
Inventories consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
March 31, 2004 |
|
June 30, 2003 |
|
||
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
||
Work in process |
|
$ |
14,414 |
|
$ |
16,283 |
|
Finished goods |
|
2,491 |
|
2,720 |
|
||
Inventory held at subcontractors |
|
1,720 |
|
2,001 |
|
||
Total |
|
18,625 |
|
21,004 |
|
||
Less: Inventory reserve |
|
(11,148 |
) |
(12,946 |
) |
||
Inventories, net |
|
$ |
7,477 |
|
$ |
8,058 |
|
8. ASSET PURCHASES AND SALES
In December 2003, the Company completed two transactions with an independent third party, whereby it provided an asset license agreement and sold certain assets recognizing a gain on the sale of assets in the amount of $0.8 million.
For the comparative nine-month period ended March 31, 2003, the Company completed the purchase of substantially all of the assets of GBase Communications, a developer of CDMA2000 base station systems and packet data servicing nodes for third generation markets under a license from Qualcomm, Inc. The purchase was accounted for as an acquisition of assets.
Under the asset purchase agreement, the Company acquired substantially all of GBases assets and assumed most of its liabilities for an initial purchase price of 0.32 million common shares at $20 per share. An additional 0.02 million common shares were placed in escrow pending the satisfaction of certain contingencies. Contingent consideration of 0.08 million common shares were placed in escrow and scheduled to be released in two tranches subject to the continued employment of key GBase personnel for periods of 12 and 18 months following the asset purchase. As of April 2004, all of the contingent share consideration referenced above has been released from escrow to the GBase Communications Liquidating Trust (the "Trust") as the successor-in-interest to GBase.
In addition, if the average of the Companys closing share price during the last calendar quarter of 2003 was below approximately $20 per share, the Company would be obligated to issue additional contingent consideration in common shares and cash, such that the total consideration at that time would equal $6.7 million. In March 2004, the Company issued 0.7 million common shares to the Trust as additional contingent share consideration pursuant to this obligation. The Company has accrued for $0.6 million, and is presently negotiating payment of the additional contingent cash consideration with the Trust, including any disputes regarding the calculation of the contingent cash consideration.
The following table summarizes the consideration paid and allocation of purchase price for GBase (in thousands):
Acquisition costs |
|
$ |
270 |
|
Liabilities assumed |
|
705 |
|
|
Common shares issued |
|
5,302 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,277 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other tangible assets |
|
$ |
123 |
|
Qualcomm licenses |
|
1,403 |
|
|
Purchased technology |
|
4,751 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,277 |
|
9
The value of the contingent consideration related to the continued employment of GBase personnel of $0.3 million and $0.1 million are being recognized ratably as stock compensation expense over 12 and 18 months, respectively, from the date of completion of the asset purchase. For the three-month and nine-month periods ended March 31, 2004, $0.1 million and $0.1 million, respectively, related to this contingent consideration were recognized as compensation expense and classified as research and development expenses in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations. Purchased technology is amortized over the estimated useful life of 4 years and is classified as cost of revenue.
In October 2002, the Company entered into a licensing agreement with Telos Technology Ltd. Under the agreement, the Company granted a perpetual license to Telos to use certain technology acquired in the GBase acquisition for consideration of $2 million. The $2 million received was offset against the cost of GBases purchased technology.
9. RESTRUCTURING CHARGES
The Companys restructuring accrual is summarized as follows (in thousands):
For the
three-month period ended |
|
Restructuring |
|
Additions/ |
|
Payments |
|
Restructuring |
|
||||
Future lease payments related to abandoned facilities |
|
$ |
1,465 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
(305 |
) |
$ |
1,160 |
|
Workforce reduction |
|
170 |
|
4 |
|
(55 |
) |
119 |
|
||||
Total |
|
$ |
1,635 |
|
$ |
4 |
|
$ |
(360 |
) |
$ |
1,279 |
|
For the
nine-month period ended |
|
Restructuring |
|
Additions/ |
|
Payments |
|
Restructuring |
|
||||
Future lease payments related to abandoned facilities |
|
$ |
1,765 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
(605 |
) |
$ |
1,160 |
|
Workforce reduction |
|
150 |
|
436 |
|
(467 |
) |
119 |
|
||||
Total |
|
$ |
1,915 |
|
$ |
436 |
|
$ |
(1,072 |
) |
$ |
1,279 |
|
During the first nine months of fiscal 2004, the Company continued its restructuring program and accordingly recorded additional restructuring expenses principally related to severance payments of $0.4 million.
The remaining restructuring accrual for future lease payments related to abandoned facilities of $1.2 million and workforce reduction of approximately $0.1 million is expected to be paid out through calendar 2004, and is included on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as accrued restructuring expenses.
10. ACCRUED WARRANTY AND RELATED COSTS
The Company offers a basic limited parts and labor warranty on its hardware products. The basic warranty period for hardware products is typically one year from the date of purchase by the end user. The Company currently provides for the estimated costs that may be incurred under its basic limited product warranties at the time related revenue is recognized. Factors in determining appropriate accruals for product warranty obligations include the size of the installed base of products subject to warranty protection, historical warranty claim rates, and knowledge of specific product failures that are outside of the Companys typical experience. The Company assesses the adequacy of its warranty liability at least quarterly and adjusts the amounts as necessary based on actual experience and changes in future expectations.
The following table reconciles changes in the Companys accrued warranties which is included in accrued expenses and related costs for the three and nine-month periods ended March 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively:
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
Nine Months Ended March 31, |
|
||||||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||||
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
(unaudited) |
|
||||||||
Beginning accrued warranty and related costs |
|
$ |
299 |
|
$ |
469 |
|
$ |
569 |
|
$ |
644 |
|
Cost of warranty claims |
|
|
|
|
|
(270 |
) |
(175 |
) |
||||
Ending accrued warranty and related costs |
|
$ |
299 |
|
$ |
469 |
|
$ |
299 |
|
$ |
469 |
|
10
11. LINES OF CREDIT
The Company has two credit facilities for a European subsidiary with Royal Bank of Scotland. The first $0.5 million facility carries an interest rate of New York LIBOR +2.5% with no payment terms specified. Availability is based on amounts drawn not to exceed 50% of the European subsidiarys trade receivables due less than 120 days. The second $1.5 million facility carries an interest rate of New York LIBOR +3% payable monthly, with quarterly repayment of principal over three years. Collateral is based on specific receivables and certain assets of the Companys European subsidiary. As of March 31, 2004, $0.1 million has been drawn down under the two facilities and is outstanding. If the Company elects to borrow funds under its committed lines of credit, the Company will incur additional interest expense during any periods when amounts are outstanding under the lines of credit. The two credit facilities will expire in October 2004.
In June 2003, the Company obtained a revolving line of credit in the amount of $1.0 million from Silicon Valley Bank at an interest rate of 1.5% monthly on gross accounts receivable outstanding. In September 2003, the availability under the line of credit was increased to $2.5 million. The line of credit is available through June 29, 2004. As of March 31, 2004, $2.5 million has been drawn down and is outstanding. Repayment is required when collateralized receivables are 90 days past due unless replenished by a more current receivable.
12. TRANSACTIONS WITH SHAREHOLDERS, MAJOR CUSTOMERS AND CONCENTRATION OF RISK
The Company is engaged in business transactions with shareholders or major customers resulting in the following revenue (in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
Nine Months Ended March 31, |
|
||||||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||||
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
(unaudited) |
|
||||||||
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Commercial Facilitators Limited |
|
$ |
2,310 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
7,190 |
|
$ |
|
|
Dena Technologies |
|
1,371 |
|
|
|
1,392 |
|
|
|
||||
Bell Benin Communications |
|
602 |
|
1,055 |
|
1,645 |
|
1,739 |
|
||||
Young Design Inc. |
|
|
|
855 |
|
|
|
1,417 |
|
||||
Soltelco |
|
|
|
773 |
|
266 |
|
773 |
|
||||
Eastern Communications Co., Ltd.** |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
2,806 |
|
||||
Total |
|
$ |
4,283 |
|
$ |
2,883 |
|
$ |
10,493 |
|
$ |
6,735 |
|
** Shareholder of the Company
These customers accounted for the following percentages of revenues comprising greater than 10% of revenue:
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
Nine Months Ended March 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
(unaudited) |
|
||||
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Facilitators Limited |
|
24 |
% |
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
Dena Technologies |
|
14 |
% |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
Bell Benin Communications |
|
|
* |
16 |
% |
|
* |
|
* |
Young Design Inc. |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
|
* |
Soltelco |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
* |
|
* |
Eastern Communications Co., Ltd.** |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
13 |
% |
* Less than 10%
** Shareholder of the Company
Financial instruments which potentially subject the Company to a concentration of credit risk principally consist of trade receivables. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and generally does not require additional collateral (other than security interest in the equipment) on trade receivables.
The following table summarizes information relating to the Companys significant customers with trade receivable balances greater than 10% as of:
11
|
|
March 31, 2004 |
|
June 30, 2003 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
||
Trade Receivables: |
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Facilitators Limited |
|
22 |
% |
|
|
Widespread Trading International |
|
|
* |
25 |
% |
FSM Telecommunications Corporation |
|
12 |
% |
|
* |
* Less than 10%
13. COMMITMENTS
(a) OPERATING LEASE COMMITMENTS
The Company leases its facilities under non-cancelable operating leases. These leases expire at various dates through December 2006. Future minimum lease payments as of March 31, 2004 (including the former Menlo Park facility discussed below) are as follows (in thousands):
Fiscal Years ending June 30, |
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
$ |
528 |
|
2005 |
|
1,876 |
|
|
2006 |
|
634 |
|
|
2007 |
|
17 |
|
|
Total minimum lease payments |
|
$ |
3,055 |
|
In May 2003, the Company vacated its Menlo Park, California facility and, in September 2003, renegotiated all remaining obligations under the lease agreement in exchange for 19 equal monthly payments of $0.1 million beginning October 2003. The amount of the remaining obligation is included in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as accrued restructuring expense.
Also in May 2003, the Company relocated its principal administrative, manufacturing and engineering facilities from its facility in Menlo Park, California to its main 34,500 square foot facility in Mountain View, California, which is also used for planning, procurement, final assembly, system testing, and quality control. The three-year lease commenced in May 2003.
Rent expense was approximately $0.3 million and $0.2 million for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2004 and 2003, and $0.8 million and $1.5 million for the nine-month periods ended March 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
(b) CAPITAL LEASE COMMITMENTS
The Company has two capital leases. These leases expire in December 2004 and February 2005. Aggregate future minimum lease payments as of March 31, 2004 are as follows (in thousands):
Year ending June 30, |
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
$ |
136 |
|
2005 |
|
316 |
|
|
Total minimum lease payments |
|
452 |
|
|
Less interest |
|
(20 |
) |
|
Present value of payments under capital lease |
|
432 |
|
|
Less current portion |
|
(432 |
) |
|
Long-term portion of capital lease obligation |
|
$ |
|
|
(c) FUTURE QUALCOMM LICENSE PAYMENTS
Future payments due to Qualcomm for a worldwide CDMA infrastructure license are included with accrued expenses on the condensed consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2004 in the amount of $1.3 million, net of interest imputed at a rate of 10% per annum.
12
(d) CONTRACT MANUFACTURERS
The Company generally commits to purchase products from its contract manufacturers covered by forecasts with cancellation fees. As of March 31, 2004, the Company had committed to make purchases totaling $1.9 million from these manufacturers in the next 12 months. The Company has provided a $37 thousand reserve for commitment cancellations for the next 12 months as of March 31, 2004.
In the normal course of business, we provide indemnifications of varying scope to customers against claims of intellectual property infringement made by third parties arising from the use of our products. Historically, costs related to these guarantees have not been significant and we are unable to estimate the maximum potential impact of these guarantees on our future results of operations.
14. COMMON SHARE AND WARRANT ISSUANCE
In November 2003, the Company completed a $5.3 million private placement of 1.35 million newly issued common shares. The common shares were sold at a discount of approximately 9% from the average closing sale price of its common shares for the five trading days preceding the closing date. The net proceeds of this financing are being used for general corporate purposes. During the nine-month period ended March 31, 2004, the Company also issued 37,447 common shares in the amount of $0.1 million to certain members of the Board of Directors in lieu of director fees.
For the comparable nine-month period ended March 31, 2003, the Company amended its original equipment manufacturer agreement with UTStarcom, Inc. Additionally, UTStarcom acquired 0.58 million common shares of the Company for a purchase price of $3.0 million, which represents the fair market value of the transaction. During the nine-month period ended March 31, 2003, the Company also issued warrants to purchase 0.2 million of its common shares to UTStarcom. The fair value of the warrant of $0.3 million was determined using the Black-Scholes pricing model with the following assumptions: interest rate at 3.5%, volatility at 122%, exercise price at $2.10 and 3-year term. The $0.3 million was charged to the Companys condensed consolidated statement of operations as selling, general and administrative expense.
In March 2004, the Company has issued 0.7 million common shares to the GBase liquidating trust as part of the GBase contingent consideration shares and 0.1 million common shares in satisfaction of certain contingencies relating to the GBase acquisition.
15. SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Company operates in a single segment. The Companys cellular products, such as GSM infrastructure equipment and software, support an entire wireless network within a single, compact enclosure.
Due to the nature of the Companys business, shipments are frequently made to a systems integrator located in the United States or in another country, only to be repackaged and shipped to a different country for actual installation. Geographic revenue information for the three-month and nine-month periods ended March 31, 2004 and 2003 is based on the location of the Companys customers. Long-lived assets include property, plant and equipment and intangible assets. Property, plant and equipment information is based on the physical location of the asset at the end of each period presented.
The following table sets forth the Companys total revenues and property, plant and equipment information for geographic areas (in thousands):
13
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
Nine months ended March 31, |
|
||||||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||||
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
(unaudited) |
|
||||||||
Net Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
United States |
|
$ |
1,938 |
|
$ |
2,096 |
|
$ |
4,054 |
|
$ |
5,667 |
|
North America (other than United States) |
|
1,852 |
|
473 |
|
2,475 |
|
1,270 |
|
||||
Latin America |
|
2 |
|
103 |
|
43 |
|
363 |
|
||||
Europe, Middle East and Africa |
|
4,602 |
|
3,016 |
|
18,454 |
|
9,516 |
|
||||
Asia Pacific |
|
1,316 |
|
892 |
|
5,856 |
|
4,669 |
|
||||
Total |
|
$ |
9,710 |
|
$ |
6,580 |
|
$ |
30,882 |
|
$ |
21,485 |
|
|
|
As of
March 31, |
|
As of
June 30, |
|
||
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
||
Property, Plant and Equipment: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
United States |
|
$ |
2,061 |
|
$ |
2,969 |
|
Latin America |
|
30 |
|
31 |
|
||
Europe, Middle East and Africa |
|
461 |
|
437 |
|
||
Asia Pacific |
|
456 |
|
884 |
|
||
Total |
|
$ |
3,008 |
|
$ |
4,321 |
|
All intangible assets are located in the United States.
16. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
On November 21, 2001, interWAVE and various of its officers and directors were named as defendants in Middleton v. interWAVE Communications International Ltd., et al., Case No. 01-CV-10598, a purported securities class action lawsuit filed in United States District Court, Southern District of New York. On April 19, 2002, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint. The amended complaint asserts that the prospectus from interWAVEs January 28, 2000 initial public offering (IPO) failed to disclose certain alleged improper actions by various underwriters for the offering in the allocation of IPO shares. The amended complaint alleges claims against certain underwriters, interWAVE and its officers and directors under the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Similar complaints have been filed concerning more than 300 other IPOs and these cases have been coordinated as In re Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation, 21 MC 92.
On July 15, 2002, the issuers filed an omnibus motion to dismiss for failure to comply with applicable pleading standards. On October 8, 2002, the Court entered an Order of Dismissal as to all of the individual defendants in the IPO litigation, without prejudice. On February 19, 2003, the Court denied the motion to dismiss against interWAVE.
A committee of interWAVEs Board of Directors has accepted a proposal to settle and release claims against the issuer defendants, including interWAVE. The settlement is subject to a number of conditions, including approval of the court. If the settlement does not occur, and litigation against interWAVE continues, interWAVE believes it has meritorious defenses and intends to defend the action vigorously. These legal proceedings may be time consuming and expensive and the outcome could be adverse to interWAVE. An adverse outcome could have a material adverse effect on interWAVEs financial position, its business and results of operations.
interWAVE may from time to time become a party to various legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business.
14
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this report on Form 10-Q. This report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1993, as amended. The words expects, anticipates, believes, intends, plans and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. In addition, any statements which refer to expectations, projections or other characterizations of future events or circumstances are forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to publicly disclose any revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring subsequent to filing this Form 10-Q with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties, including, without limitation, those discussed below in Risk Factors. Accordingly, our future results may differ materially from historical results or from those discussed or implied by these forward-looking statements. Our fiscal year ends on the actual calendar month end of June 30.
OVERVIEW
interWAVE Communications International Ltd. is a global provider of scaleable wireless infrastructure networks that offer a cost effective solution to extend coverage and connectivity to hard-to-reach areas. We were incorporated in June 1994 and recorded our first product sale in May 1997. Our systems support wireless voice and data transmission for both mobile and fixed applications.
We offer a complete line of compact GSM systems. We have pioneered what we believe is the only commercially available system that provides all of the infrastructure equipment and software necessary to support an entire wireless network within a single, compact enclosure. Our networks may be deployed in communities with a few thousand subscribers and may be scaled to grow to more than a hundred thousand subscribers. Our products provide wireless network operators with a simple, easy-to-support and maintain network that is software configurable to various network architectures.
We generate revenues through sales by our direct sales force to wireless service providers, sales to system integrators that either sell our systems on a stand-alone basis or integrate them with their systems and sales to communications equipment providers. The components of sales by channel in percentage of revenues are as follows:
|
|
Three Months
Ended |
|
Nine
Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
Wireless service providers |
|
86 |
% |
57 |
% |
85 |
% |
55 |
% |
System integrators |
|
10 |
% |
30 |
% |
11 |
% |
23 |
% |
Communication equipment providers |
|
4 |
% |
13 |
% |
4 |
% |
22 |
% |
Net revenues outside North America represented approximately 79% and 68% of total net revenues for the nine months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, and 61% and 61% of total revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. We have derived and expect to continue to derive a majority of our revenues from products installed outside the United States by both non-U.S. and U.S. based communications equipment providers, systems integrators and wireless service providers. We believe that the majority of products we sell in the United States are ultimately installed outside the United States. Accordingly, our business is exposed to risks from economic uncertainties, currency fluctuations, political instability, uncertain regulatory environments and other risks associated with global operations.
Of the revenue for the nine-month period ended March 31, 2004, 60% was derived from sales in Europe, the Middle East and Africa, 19% was derived from sales in the Asia Pacific, and 21% was derived from sales in North America. Of the revenue for the three-month period ended March 31, 2004, 47% was derived from sales in Europe, the Middle East and Africa, 14% was derived from sales in Asia Pacific, and 39% was derived from sales in North America. We intend to continue our expansion into Russia and to establish a more significant presence in Eastern Europe, where cellular service penetration is low and we believe the potential for growth is significant.
In September 2002, we completed the purchase of substantially all of the assets of GBase Communications, a developer of CDMA2000 base station systems and packet data servicing nodes for third generation markets under a license from Qualcomm, Inc. During the March 2003 quarter, we began offering CDMA2000 products, beginning with our 1XRTT products. We are in the process of developing switching nodes, value added servers and operation maintenance (O&M) systems to complement products acquired in the GBase asset purchase, which will enable us to offer full CDMA systems to service providers.
We generated net revenues of $30.9 million and $21.5 million for the nine-month periods ended March 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. We incurred net losses of $5.6 million and $23.1 million for the nine-month periods ended March 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. As of March 31, 2004, we had an accumulated deficit of $332.5 million.
15
In the first three fiscal quarters of 2004, we continued to face a challenging global economic environment. During this period, we continued downsizing and realigning our company to focus on our core business as a provider of cellular infrastructure networks to network operators.
In November 2003, we completed a $5.3 million private placement of our newly issued common shares. The common shares were sold at a discount of approximately 9% from the average closing sale price of our common shares for the five trading days preceding the closing date. The net proceeds of this financing are being used for general corporate purposes.
In December 2003, we completed two transactions with an independent third party, whereby we provided an asset license agreement and sold certain assets recognizing a gain on the sale of assets in the amount of $0.8 million.
For the remainder of fiscal 2004, we plan to refine our sales and marketing strategy in light of improving worldwide economic conditions. We plan to market into countries where wireless telephone services are necessary for continued economic survival, offering solutions at prices for overall network deployment that are targeted to allow network operators to break even on their operations within one year. We plan to make further inroads into regions in Russia, Latin America, the former Soviet states, and parts of Asia.
We intend to focus on the continued reduction in operational, sales and marketing costs by relying increasingly on our partners. We plan to move direct support services to these partners or third party systems integrators. We also plan to reduce costs on core product lines through design and manufacturing improvements.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
In preparing our condensed consolidated financial statements, we make assumptions, judgments and estimates that can have a significant impact on our total revenue and net income, as well as on the value of certain assets and liabilities on our condensed consolidated balance sheet. We base our assumptions, judgments and estimates on historical experience and various other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ materially from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We believe that the assumptions, judgments and estimates involved in the accounting for revenue recognition, accounts receivable valuation, inventory valuation, and restructuring charges have the greatest potential impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements, so we consider these to be our critical accounting policies. These policies, and our procedures related to these policies, are described in detail below.
Revenue Recognition
We recognize revenue in accordance with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104 (SAB 104) Revenue Recognition. SAB 104 revises or rescinds portions of the interpretive guidance related to revenue recognition included in Topic 13 of the codification of the staff accounting bulletins. Accordingly, equipment revenue is recognized when all of the following have occurred: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the product has been shipped, title and all of the benefits and risks of ownership including risk of loss have passed to the customer, we have the right to invoice the customer, collection of the receivable is reasonably assured, and we have fulfilled all pre-sale contractual obligations to the customer. Revenue from extended warranty coverage and customer support is recognized ratably over the period of the service contract. Trial sales made directly to wireless service providers are not recognized as revenue until the trial is successfully completed. Trials conducted by communications service providers and systems integrators are normally shipped from their inventory and do not result in any incremental revenue to us. Although our products contain a software component, the software is not sold separately and we do not provide software upgrades to our customers.
On July 1, 2003, the beginning of our fiscal 2004, we adopted accounting pronouncement EITF 00-21, Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables, which addresses whether a customer arrangement contains more than one unit of accounting and the measurement and allocation of the separate units of accounting in the customer arrangement. Application of EITF 00-21 in the first quarter of fiscal 2004 did not materially impact our financial results.
16
Accounts Receivable Valuation
We evaluate the collectibility of our trade receivables based on a combination of factors. When we become aware of a specific customers inability to meet its financial obligations to us, such as in the case of bankruptcy filings or deterioration in the customers operating results or financial position, we estimate a specific allowance for bad debt to reduce the related receivable to the amount we reasonably believe is collectible. We also record allowances for doubtful accounts for all other customers based on a variety of factors, including the length of time the receivables are past due and historical collection experience. If circumstances related to specific customers change, our estimates of the recoverability of receivables are also likely to change.
Inventory Valuation
We perform a detailed assessment of inventory at each balance sheet date, which includes a review of, among other factors, demand requirements, product lifecycle and product development plans, quality issues, excess inventory and obsolescence. Based on this analysis, we estimate adjustments, when appropriate, to reflect inventory at net realizable value.
Restructuring Charges
Our Board of Directors approved a plan to reduce the aggregate workforce of interWAVE, consolidate facilities, and restructure certain business functions to streamline the organization for cost reduction primarily due to the severe downturn in the economic environment in the telecommunications industry. Restructuring charges are recorded in the consolidated statement of operations as a separate line item. Please refer to Note 9 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for further discussion of our restructuring activities.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table sets forth for the periods indicated our results of operations expressed as a percentage of revenues:
|
|
Three
Months Ended |
|
Nine
Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
(unaudited) |
|
||||
Net revenues |
|
100.0 |
% |
100.0 |
% |
100.0 |
% |
100.0 |
% |
Cost of revenues |
|
47.7 |
|
74.9 |
|
52.1 |
|
81.9 |
|
Gross margin |
|
52.3 |
|
25.1 |
|
47.9 |
|
18.1 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
23.5 |
|
49.4 |
|
22.2 |
|
51.0 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
41.2 |
|
59.8 |
|
44.6 |
|
70.5 |
|
Amortization of deferred stock compensation |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
Gains on asset sales |
|
|
|
(5.0 |
) |
(2.6 |
) |
(1.1 |
) |
Restructuring charges |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
1.4 |
|
3.3 |
|
Total operating expenses |
|
64.7 |
|
106.6 |
|
65.6 |
|
124.6 |
|
Loss from operations |
|
(12.4 |
) |
(81.5 |
) |
(17.7 |
) |
(106.5 |
) |
Interest income (expense), net |
|
(0.1 |
) |
(0.7 |
) |
(0.3 |
) |
0.4 |
|
Other expense, net |
|
0.4 |
|
1.3 |
|
(0.4 |
) |
0.2 |
|
Income tax benefit (expense) |
|
0.6 |
|
(2.1 |
) |
0.2 |
|
(1.7 |
) |
Net loss |
|
(11.5 |
)% |
(83.0 |
)% |
(18.2 |
)% |
(107.6 |
)% |
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2004 AND 2003
REVENUES
Revenues increased 48%, or $3.1 million, from $6.6 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2003 to $9.7 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2004 as a result of increased sales to existing customers and sales to new customers due to the improving global economic environment and our continued penetration into the African continent. Our increased revenues primarily resulted from increased sales to wireless service providers, which increased from $3.7 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2003 to $8.3 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2004, partially offset by decreased sales to system integrators, which decreased from $2.0 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2003 to $1.0 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2004 and by decreased sales to communications equipment providers, which decreased from $0.9 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2003 to $0.4 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2004.
17
COST OF REVENUES
Cost of revenues decreased 6%, or $0.3 million, from $4.9 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2003 to $4.6 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2004. As a percentage of total revenues, cost of revenues was 48% in the third quarter of fiscal 2004 and 75% in the third quarter of fiscal 2003. Changes in the types of products and services required by our customers affect our cost of revenues depending on the mix of high or low margin products required by them. In the third quarter of fiscal 2004, 19% of total revenues was attributed to our WAVEXchange and Network-In-A-Box products, which earn relatively high gross profits, while 49% was attributed to our WAVEXpress/BTS, which earns relatively low gross profits. In the same period in fiscal 2003, 6% of total revenues was attributed to the relatively high margin WAVEXchange and Network-In-A-Box products, while 30% was attributed to the relatively low margin WAVEXpress/BTS. Additionally, in the third quarter of fiscal 2003, certain fulfillment costs for customer shipments were recognized for which related revenue was recognized on a cash receipt basis in another period, thereby increasing cost of revenues for the third quarter of fiscal 2003.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
Research and development expenses decreased 30%, or $1.0 million, from $3.3 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2003 to $2.3 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2004. The change is primarily due to a decrease of $0.3 million in labor-related costs as a result of a decrease in salaries, fringe benefits and bonuses related to reductions in our workforce. The remaining decrease of $0.7 million is due to reductions in research and development materials, professional fees, depreciation and other miscellaneous expenses.
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE
Selling, general and administrative expense increased 2%, or $0.1 million, from $3.9 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2003 to $4.0 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2004. This increase is primarily attributed to a $0.3 million increase in the bad debt provision and a $0.1 million increase in travel and miscellaneous expenses, which are partially offset by a $0.3 million decrease in labor-related costs due to continued reductions in our workforce.
AMORTIZATION OF DEFERRED STOCK COMPENSATION
We did not incur amortization of deferred stock compensation expense in the third quarter of fiscal 2004 compared to $79 thousand in the same quarter of fiscal 2003. Deferred stock compensation was fully amortized in March 2003.
There were no gains on asset sales during the quarter ended March 31, 2004. The $0.3 million gain on asset sales in the first three months of fiscal 2003 relates to our sale of certain fixed assets to third parties.
RESTRUCTURING CHARGES
In accordance with our plan to reduce our workforce, consolidate facilities and restructure certain business functions to achieve cost reductions, we recorded restructuring charges of $4 thousand and $79 thousand in the third quarters of fiscal 2004 and 2003, respectively. See Note 9 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for details.
18
INTEREST INCOME
Interest income decreased 86%, or $19 thousand, from $22 thousand in the third fiscal quarter of 2003 to $3 thousand in the third fiscal quarter of 2004. This decrease was due to the continued usage of funds for operations. The increase in cash balance was offset by the decline in interest rates.
INTEREST EXPENSE
Interest expense was $14 thousand and $66 thousand in the third fiscal quarters of 2004 and 2003, respectively. This expense was primarily associated with our short-term borrowings and equipment loans and leases.
NINE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2004 AND 2003
REVENUES
Revenues increased 44%, or $9.4 million, from $21.5 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2003 to $30.9 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2004 as a result of increased sales to existing customers and sales to new customers due to the improving global economic environment and our continued penetration into the African continent. Our increased total revenues primarily resulted from increased sales to wireless service providers, which increased from $11.7 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2003 to $26.3 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2004, partially offset by decreased sales to system integrators, which decreased from $4.9 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2003 to $3.4 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2004, and by decreased sales to communications equipment providers, which decreased from $4.8 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2003 to $1.2 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2004.
COST OF REVENUES
Cost of revenues decreased 9%, or $1.5 million, from $17.6 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2003 to $16.1 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2004. As a percentage of total revenues, cost of revenues was 52% in the first nine months of fiscal 2004 and 82% in the first nine months of fiscal 2003. Changes in the types of products and services required by our customers affect our cost of revenues depending on the mix of high or low margin products required by them. In the first nine months of fiscal 2004, 10% of total revenues was attributed to our WAVEXchange and Network-In-A-Box products, which earn relatively high gross profits, while 47% was attributed to our WAVEXpress/BTS, which earns relatively low gross profits. In the same period in fiscal 2003, 4% of total revenues was attributed to the relatively high margin WAVEXchange and Network-In-A-Box products, while 46% was attributed to the relatively low margin WAVEXpress/BTS. Additionally, in the third quarter of fiscal 2003, certain fulfillment costs for customer shipments were recognized for which related revenue was recognized on a cash receipt basis, thereby increasing cost of revenues for the first nine months of fiscal 2003.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
Research and development expenses decreased by 37%, or $4.1 million, from $11.0 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2003 to $6.9 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2004. The change is primarily due to a decrease of $1.7 million in labor-related costs as a result of a decrease in salaries, fringe benefits and bonuses related to reductions in our workforce. The remaining decrease of $2.4 million is due to reductions in research and development materials, professional fees, depreciation and other miscellaneous expenses.
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE
Selling, general and administrative expense decreased 9%, or $1.4 million, from $15.2 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2003 to $13.8 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2004. This decrease is primarily attributed to a decrease of $1.0 million in labor-related costs due to continued reductions in our workforce. The remaining decrease of $0.4 million is comprised of professional and legal fees, public relations and marketing expense, depreciation, telephone and other miscellaneous expenses.
AMORTIZATION OF DEFERRED STOCK COMPENSATION
We did not incur amortization of deferred stock compensation expense in the first nine months of fiscal 2004 compared to a charge of $0.2 million in the same period of fiscal 2003. Deferred stock compensation was fully amortized in March 2003.
19
GAINS ON ASSET SALES
The $0.2 million gain on asset sales in the first nine months of fiscal 2003 relates to our sale of certain fixed assets to third parties. The $0.8 million gain on asset sales in the first nine months of fiscal 2004 includes two transactions in December 2003 with an independent third party, whereby we provided an asset license agreement and sold certain assets.
RESTRUCTURING CHARGES
In accordance with our plan to reduce our workforce, consolidate facilities and restructure certain business functions to achieve cost reductions, we recorded restructuring charges of $0.4 million and $0.7 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2004 and 2003, respectively. See Note 9 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for details.
INTEREST INCOME
Interest income decreased 98%, or $0.1 million, from $0.1 million in the first nine months of 2003 to $3 thousand in the first nine months of 2004. This decrease was due to the continued usage of funds for operations. The increase in cash balance was offset by the decline in interest rates.
INTEREST EXPENSE
Interest expense was $87 thousand and $67 thousand in the first nine months of 2004 and 2003, respectively. This expense was primarily associated with our short-term borrowings and equipment loans and leases.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Operating Activities. For the nine month period ended March 31, 2004, net cash used in operating activities of $3.1 million was primarily attributable to net losses from operations, gain on asset sales and decreases in accrued liabilities and deferred revenue, partially offset by non-cash depreciation and amortization, as well as by a decrease in inventory and an increase in accounts payable. For the nine month period ended March 31, 2003, net cash used in operating activities of $11.4 million was primarily attributable to net losses from operations, decreases in accounts payable and accrued liabilities, partially offset by non-cash depreciation and amortization as well as decreases in trade receivables and inventory.
Investing Activities. For the nine month period ended March 31, 2004, net cash used in investing activities of $0.2 million was primarily related to purchases of property and equipment, partially offset by the sale of our long term investment in Ireland. For the nine month period ended March 31, 2003, net cash provided by investing activities of $2.1 million consisted primarily of the sale of short-term investments, partially offset by purchases of property and equipment. We expect that capital expenditures will remain nominal due to our continued cost-cutting efforts and conservation of cash resources.
Financing Activities. For the nine month period ended March 31, 2004, net cash provided by financing activities of $6.3 million consisted of our closing of a $5.3 million private placement of our newly issued common shares and $2.5 million of short-term borrowing, partially offset by principal payments on notes payable and capital equipment leases. For the nine month period ended March 31, 2003, net cash provided by financing activities of $3.1 million consisted of $3.0 million raised through the sale of common shares to UTStarcom, Inc. and payments received on notes receivable, offset by principal payments on notes payable and other liabilities.
Commitments. We lease all of our facilities under operating leases that expire at various dates through calendar 2006. As of March 31, 2004, we had $0.5 million in future operating lease commitments for the remainder of fiscal 2004. In May 2003, we relocated our principal administrative, manufacturing and engineering facilities from our former facility in Menlo Park, California to our main 34,500 square foot facility in Mountain View, California, which is also used for planning, procurement, final assembly, system testing, and quality control. We commenced a three-year lease on our Mountain View facility in May 2003. In the future we expect to continue to finance the acquisition of computer and network equipment through additional equipment financing arrangements. Our significant cash commitments for the next few years are summarized as follows:
20
|
|
Payments Due By Period |
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
Total |
|
Less Than
1 |
|
1-3 Years |
|
3-5 Years |
|
More Than
5 |
|
|||||
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|||||||||||||
Operating lease commitments |
|
$ |
3,055 |
|
$ |
2,090 |
|
$ |
965 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Purchase commitments |
|
1,904 |
|
1,904 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Restructuring commitments |
|
1,279 |
|
1,195 |
|
84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Qualcomm license scheduled payments |
|
1,287 |
|
1,287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Capital lease commitments |
|
452 |
|
452 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Short-term borrowings |
|
2,500 |
|
2,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total |
|
$ |
10,477 |
|
$ |
9,428 |
|
$ |
1,049 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
In January and March 2001, we entered into two equipment financing agreements for an aggregate total of $2 million. The equipment financing agreements function similarly to lines of credit, whereby the interest rate on each loan for equipment is determined at the time we draw down from the financing agreements. Such loans carry interest rates ranging from 9.8% to 10.3%. The financing equipment loans carry terms ranging from three to four years. Our obligations under these loans are collateralized by the assets being financed. We had $0.5 million outstanding as of March 31, 2004, under these loans. We intend to repay approximately $0.5 million of the outstanding balance as of March 31, 2004 over the next twelve months.
In addition, we have two credit facilities through a European subsidiary with Royal Bank of Scotland. The first $0.5 million credit facility carries an interest rate of New York LIBOR +2.5% with no payment terms specified. The second $1.5 million credit facility carries an interest rate of New York LIBOR +3% payable monthly, with quarterly repayment of principal over three years. As of March 31, 2004, $0.1 million was drawn down on these credit facilities and is outstanding. If we elect to borrow funds under these committed lines of credit, we will incur additional interest expense during any periods when amounts are outstanding under the lines of credit. The two credit facilities will expire in October 2004.
In June 2003, we obtained a revolving line of credit in the amount of $1.0 million from Silicon Valley Bank at an interest rate of 1.5% monthly on gross accounts receivable outstanding. In September 2003, the availability under the line of credit was increased to $2.5 million. The line of credit is available through June 29, 2004. $2.5 million has been drawn down and is outstanding as of March 31, 2004. Repayment is required when a specific receivable is 90 days past due unless replenished by a more current receivable. We plan to renew the Silicon Valley Bank line of credit on June 29, 2004. We are presently in discussion with third party investors to raise additional funds up to $2.0 million.
In May 2003, we vacated our Menlo Park, California facility and, in September 2003, we renegotiated our remaining obligations under the lease agreement for the facility and agreed to make 19 equal monthly payments of $0.1 million beginning October 2003.
As of April 2004, we have released 0.1 million of our common shares held in escrow to the GBase Communications Liquidating Trust, the successor-in-interest to GBase due to the satisfaction of certain contingencies as described in the asset purchase agreement with GBase. Pursuant to the asset purchase agreement with GBase, we also agreed that if our average closing price during the last calendar quarter of 2003 was below approximately $20 per share, we would be obligated to issue additional contingent consideration in comon shares and cash, such that the total consideration at that time would equal $6.7 million. Pursuant to this obligation, in March 2004, we issued 0.7 million of our common shares to GBase Communications Liquidating Trust. We have accrued $0.6 million for, and are presently negotiating with the GBase Communications Liquidating Trust the payment of the additional contingent cash consideration pursuant to this obligation.
As of March 31, 2004, we had no transactions, relationships, or other arrangements with an unconsolidated entity that is reasonably likely to materially affect liquidity, the availability of capital resources, or requirements for capital resources.
Summary of Liquidity. See Risk Factor entitled We may require additional financing to fund our operations for the remainder of fiscal 2004 and beyond and this financing may not be available for information regarding our liquidity.
21
RISK FACTORS
We may require additional financing to fund our operations for the remainder of fiscal 2004 and beyond and this financing may not be available.
We cannot assure you that our existing cash and cash equivalents will be sufficient to meet our liquidity requirements. We may require additional capital to fund our operations during the remainder of fiscal 2004 and beyond. We have had recurring net losses in the past three fiscal years and in the nine month period ended March 31, 2004. Our management is currently attempting to execute plans intended to increase revenues and margins, reduce spending and raise additional financing through the issuance of debt or equity securities, the sale of assets or through other means such as customer prepayments.
The sale of additional equity or convertible debt securities could result in additional dilution to our shareholders and such securities may have rights, preferences and privileges senior to those held by existing shareholders. In addition, the terms of any debt could impose restrictions on our operations. If additional funds are raised through the sale of our assets, we may be limited in the type of business we can carry on in the future. If we cannot raise funds on terms favorable to us, or raise funds at all, we may not be able to develop or enhance our products, take advantage of future opportunities or respond to competitive pressures or unanticipated requirements. Moreover, if we are unable to raise additional funds, we may be required to reduce the scope of our planned operations, which could harm our business, or we may even need to cease operations. We cannot assure you that we will be successful in the execution of our plans.
If the markets for our products decline further, or improve at a slower pace than we anticipate, demand for our products may be adversely affected and, therefore, our business, operating results and financial condition could be adversely affected.
As a result of the downturn in the telecommunications equipment industry, demand for our products has declined significantly. Continued weakness in the telecommunications equipment industry or deterioration of the business or financial condition of our customers in this industry could have a material adverse impact on our business, operating results and financial condition. If telecommunications equipment spending in the United States and in the other international markets we serve continues to decline or if these markets do not improve, or improve at a slower pace than we anticipate, we may experience a material adverse impact on our business, operating results and financial condition.
Because we have a limited operating history, we cannot be sure that we can successfully execute our business strategy.
We did not record revenue from our first product sale until May 1997 and we have a limited history of generating significant revenues. Some of our products are new and are being tested by customers for incorporation into live networks. Therefore, you have limited historical financial data and operating results with which to evaluate our current business and prospects. You must consider our prospects in light of the early stage of our current business in a new and rapidly evolving market. Our limited operating history may make it difficult for you to assess, based on historical information, whether we can successfully execute our business strategy. If we are unable to successfully execute our business strategy, we would be unable to achieve cash-flow breakeven, profitability or to build a sustainable business.
We have a history of losses, expect short-term future losses and may never achieve or sustain profitability.
As of March 31, 2004, we had an accumulated deficit of $332.5 million. We incurred a net loss of approximately $5.6 million for the nine month period ended March 31, 2004. We expect to continue to incur net losses in the short-term and these losses may be substantial. To achieve and sustain profitability and positive cash flow, we will need to generate substantially higher revenues. Our ability to generate future revenues, generate cash flow and achieve profitability will depend on a number of factors, many of which are beyond our control. These factors include:
the rate of market acceptance of compact mobile wireless systems;
the stability of our products;
our ability to compete successfully against much larger GSM and CDMA2000 communications equipment providers;
our ability to expand our customer base;
our ability to control costs and reduce expenses;
our ability to efficiently manufacture our products ourselves and through outsourcing arrangements;
22
our ability to absorb overhead costs through higher manufacturing volume;
our ability to develop third generation (3G) wireless products, including CDMA2000 products; and
our ability to achieve compatibility and interoperability of our GSM and CDMA2000 products with existing networks and other vendors equipment and industry standards.
Due to these factors and other factors, we may be unable to achieve or maintain profitability. If we are unable to achieve or maintain profitability, or if we are unable to achieve cash-flow breakeven, we will be unable to build a sustainable business, and our share price and the value of your investment would likely decline.
Our quarterly operating results are likely to fluctuate significantly and may fail to meet the expectations of securities analysts and investors, which may cause our share price to decline.
Our quarterly operating results have fluctuated significantly in the past and are likely to do so in the future. If our operating results do not meet the expectations of securities analysts and investors, our share price is likely to decline. The factors that could cause our quarterly results to fluctuate include:
any delay in the introduction of new products or product enhancements;
the size and timing of customer orders and our product shipments, which have typically consisted of a relatively small number of wireless network systems at the end of each quarter;
the mix of products sold, because our various products generate different gross margins;
any delay in shipments caused by component shortages or other manufacturing problems, extended product testing of complex products or regulatory issues;
the timing of orders from and shipments to major customers, including the possible cancellation of orders;
the loss of a major customer;
reductions in the selling prices of our products;
cost pressures from shortages of skilled technical employees, increased product development and engineering expenditures and other factors;
customer responses to announcements of new products and product enhancements by competitors and the entry of new competitors into our market;
economic and political conditions in the markets where we sell our products;
the amount of capital equipment spending by our customers, including telecommunications service providers and Internet service providers; and
economic conditions, including recessionary conditions in the telecommunications industry worldwide.
Due to these and other factors, our results of operations could fluctuate substantially in the future, and quarterly comparisons may not be reliable indicators of future performance. In addition, because many of our expenses for personnel, facilities and equipment are relatively fixed in nature, if revenues fail to meet our expectations, we may not be able to reduce expenses correspondingly. As a result, we would experience greater than expected net losses and net cash outflow. If we experience greater than expected net losses and net cash outflow, our share price and the value of your investment would likely decline.
23
Our quarterly revenue may be affected by the purchasing and financing process of our customers, particularly in the purchasing of complete network systems.
The sales cycle for our complete network systems may last from nine months to one year or more and the purchasing process for many customers is complex. Customers often require assistance in network planning, equipment specification, business plan preparation and financing presentations. Customers also may require a number of approvals, including the approval of licensing authorities, and in some cases, internal approvals from a technical team, management group and board of directors, as well as the approval of third party financing for the purchase. In addition, prior to submitting an order, some customers for our complete network systems require public hearings and a public decision approval process. The timing and outcome of our customers purchasing and financing processes may be difficult to determine and may affect our ability to forecast sales. If we fail to close the sale for one or more complete network systems in any fiscal quarter, or if a customer fails to obtain the required approvals or fails to obtain financing, our revenues and operating results would be adversely affected.
Our stock price has been volatile since our initial public offering, which may make it more difficult for you to resell shares at prices you find attractive.
Our stock price could fluctuate due to the following factors, among others:
announcements of operating results and business conditions by us or our competitors;
announcements by us or our competitors relating to new customers, new products or technological innovation;
economic developments and market trends in the telecommunications industry as a whole;
changes in financial estimates and recommendations by securities analysts;
political and economic developments in countries where we have business or where our customers are located;
delisting from the Nasdaq National Market; and
general market conditions.
In addition, the stock market has experienced extreme volatility, and a steep decline, with volatility that may be unrelated to the operating performance of companies and a decline related to recessionary conditions in telecommunications markets. These broad market and industry fluctuations and conditions may adversely affect the price of our stock, regardless of our operating performance.
Our stock has been subject to delisting from the Nasdaq National Market due to past maintenance standard deficiencies and may be subject to delisting in the future due to potential, new maintenance standard deficiencies.
On March 8, 2004, Nasdaq notified us that we did not meet the requirements of Marketplace Rule 4310(c)(14) because our Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended December 31, 2003, was filed with the SEC on February 17, 2004 prior to having our independent auditors complete their review of such quarterly report. As a result, our trading symbol on the Nasdaq National Market was changed from IWAV to IWAVE on March 10, 2004. Our independent auditors have since completed their review of such quarterly report and on April 13, 2004, Nasdaq notified us that we had regained compliance with Marketplace Rule 4310(c)(14). On April 14, 2004, our trading symbol no longer carried the E designation and reverted back to IWAV.
In order to maintain a listing on the Nasdaq National Market, listed issuers must, among other requirements, maintain a $1 per share minimum bid price and shareholder equity of at least $10 million. On separate occasions during calendar 2003, Nasdaq notified interWAVE that it no longer met the minimum bid price requirement and the minimum shareholder equity requirement. interWAVE subsequently cured these maintenance standard deficiencies and Nasdaq closed its inquiries in both matters.
As a matter of standard procedure, the Nasdaq National Market Staff typically evaluates compliance with its continued listing requirements on a quarterly basis concurrent with the filing of financial statements with the SEC. If we are unable to maintain compliance with the listing requirements of the Nasdaq National Market in the future, we may be subject to delisting from the Nasdaq National Market and forced to transfer the listing of our common shares to the Nasdaq SmallCap Market in order to take advantage of that markets lengthier grace periods and more lenient requirements.
24
If we are forced to transfer the listing of our common shares to the Nasdaq SmallCap Market, it could seriously limit the liquidity of our common shares and impair our potential to raise future capital through the sale of our common shares, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. The transfer of our common shares to the Nasdaq SmallCap Market could also reduce the ability of holders of our common shares to purchase or sell shares as quickly and as inexpensively as they have done historically, and may have an adverse effect on the trading price of our common shares. The transfer could also adversely affect our relationships with vendors and customers.
We extend credit to many of our customers in connection with the sale of our products.
We frequently enter into financing arrangements in connection with the sale of our products to our customers. These financing arrangements may include extended payment terms and, on occasion, lines of credit that cover not only equipment financing but also the working capital needs of our customers. We cannot assure you that these customers will be able to pay us on time, or at all. If these customers do not pay on a timely basis, our operating results would be adversely affected.
If we are unable to successfully integrate previously acquired operations, our business operating results and financial condition may be adversely affected.
We have completed several acquisitions. During fiscal year 2003, we completed our acquisition of substantially all of the assets of GBase Communications. Acquisition transactions are accompanied by a number of difficulties, including:
the difficulty of assimilating the operations and personnel of acquired companies;
the potential disruption of our ongoing business and the distraction of our management;
the difficulty of effectively managing a geographically dispersed group of employees;
the difficulty of incorporating acquired technology into our products and unanticipated expenses related to such integration;
the potential underestimation of the costs and resources required to complete development of new products in an acquired company;
maintaining customer, supplier and other favorable relationships of acquired operations;
the additional costs and unforeseen liabilities associated with acquired operations;
the correct assessment of the relative percentages of in-process research and development expense that can be immediately written off as compared to the amount which must be amortized over the appropriate life of the asset;
the impairment of assets in the telecommunications business with unfavorable market conditions, particularly for broadband wireless access products; and
the failure to successfully develop an acquired in-process technology resulting in the impairment of amounts currently capitalized as intangible assets.
We may not be successful in addressing these difficulties or any other problems encountered in connection with such acquisitions.
25
We rely on a small number of customers for most of our revenues, and a decrease in revenues from these customers could seriously harm our business.
A small number of customers account for a significant portion of our revenues. Net revenues from significant customers as a percentage of our total net revenues are as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
Nine Months Ended March 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
(unaudited) |
|
||||
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Facilitators Limited |
|
24 |
% |
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
Dena Technologies |
|
14 |
% |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
Bell Benin Communications |
|
|
* |
16 |
% |
|
* |
|
* |
Young Design Inc. |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
|
* |
Soltelco |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
* |
|
* |
Eastern Communications Co., Ltd.** |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
13 |
% |
* Less than 10%
**Shareholder of the Company
We expect that the majority of our revenues will continue to depend on sales to a small number of customers. A significant reduction in sales to any of our large customers or significant pricing and margin pressures exerted by a key customer, would adversely affect our operating results. Some of our key customers have experienced a severe downturn in their businesses. We depend on the continued growth, viability and financial stability of our customers, substantially all of which operate in an environment characterized by rapid technological change, short product life cycles, consolidation, and pricing and margin pressures. If our key customers continue to experience, or any other key customers experience, a downturn in their business or shift their purchases to our competitors, our revenues and operating results would decline.
We depend primarily on one contract manufacturer to manufacture most of our products, and plan to use only one contract manufacturer in the future.
We depend on one contract manufacturer to manufacture most of our products. We do not have a long-term supply contract with our contract manufacturer, and the manufacturer is not obligated to supply us with products for any specific period, in any specific quantity or at any specific price, except as may be provided in a particular purchase order.
There are risks associated with our dependence on one contract manufacturer, including the contract manufacturers control of capacity allocation, labor relations, production quality and other aspects of the manufacturing process. If we are unable to obtain our products from this manufacturer on schedule, revenues from the sale of products may be delayed or lost, and our reputation, relationship with customers and our business could be harmed. In addition, in the event that the contract manufacturer must be replaced, the disruption to our business and the expense associated with obtaining and qualifying a new contract manufacturer could be substantial. If problems with our contract manufacturer cause us to miss customer delivery schedules or result in unforeseen product quality problems, we may lose customers. As a result, our revenues and our future growth prospects would likely decline.
Because some of our key components come from a single source, or require long lead times, we could experience unexpected interruptions, which could cause our operating results to suffer.
A number of our suppliers are sole sources for key components for our products. These key components are complex, difficult to manufacture and require long lead times. In the event of a reduction or interruption of supply, or a degradation in quality, as much as six months could be required before we would begin receiving adequate supplies from other suppliers. Supply interruptions could delay product shipments, causing our revenues and operating results to decline.
If we fail to accurately estimate product demand, we may incur expenses for excess inventory or be unable to meet customer requirements.
Our customers typically give us firm purchase orders with short lead times before requested shipment. However, our contract manufacturer requires commitments from us so that it can allocate capacity and be assured of having adequate components and supplies from third parties. Failure to accurately estimate product demand could cause us to incur expenses related to excess inventory or prevent us from meeting customer requirements.
26
Our products are complex and may have errors or defects that are detected only after deployment in complex networks.
Our products are highly complex and are designed to be deployed in complex networks. Although our products are tested during manufacturing and prior to deployment, they can only be fully tested when deployed in networks with high-call volume. Consequently, our customers may discover errors after the products have been fully deployed in their networks. If we are unable to fix errors or other problems that may be identified in full deployment, we could experience:
costs associated with the remediation of any problems;
loss of or delay in revenues;
loss of customers;
failure to achieve market acceptance and loss of market share;
diversion of deployment resources;
diversion of research and development resources to fix errors in the field;
increased service and warranty costs;
legal actions or demands for compensation by our customers; and
increased insurance costs.
In addition, our products often are integrated with other network components. There may be incompatibilities between these components and our products that could significantly harm the service provider or its subscribers. Product problems in the field could require us to incur costs or divert resources to remedy the problems and subject us to liability for damages caused by the problems or delay in research and development projects because of the diversion of resources. These problems could also harm our reputation and competitive position in the industry.
We may experience difficulties in the introduction of new or enhanced products, such as 3G products, that could result in significant, unexpected expenses or delays in the launch of new or enhanced products.
The development of new or enhanced products is a complex and uncertain process. We may experience design, manufacturing, marketing and other difficulties that could delay or prevent our development, introduction or marketing of new products or product enhancements. We also must effectively manage the transition from old products to new or enhanced products. In September 2002, we acquired the assets of a third generation, or 3G, product development company, GBase Communications that develops products based on the CDMA2000 standard. We cannot assure you that we will be able to develop, introduce or manage 3G products or any other new product or product enhancements in a timely manner or at all. Failure to develop new products or product enhancements in a timely manner would substantially decrease market acceptance and sales of our products.
Failure to comply with regulations affecting the telecommunications industry could seriously harm our business and results of operations.
Our failure to comply with government regulations relating to the telecommunications industry in countries where our products are deployed and failure to comply with any changes to those regulations could seriously harm our business and results of operations. We have not completed all activities necessary to comply with existing regulations and requirements in some of the countries in which we intend to sell our products. Compliance with the regulations of numerous countries could be costly and delay the deployment of our products.
27
Our failure to comply with evolving industry standards could delay our introduction of new products.
An international consortium of standards bodies has established the specifications for the third generation, or 3G, wireless standard, and is working to establish the specifications of this future wireless standard and its interoperability with existing standards. Any failure of our products to comply with 3G or future standards, including Qualcomms standards for CDMA2000, could delay the introduction of these products and require costly and time consuming engineering changes. After a future standard is adopted, any delays in our introduction of next generation products could impair our ability to grow revenues in the future.
Our market opportunity could be significantly diminished in the event that GSM or any subsequent GSM-based standards do not continue to be or are not widely adopted or if CDMA2000 is not widely adopted
Most of our current products are designed to utilize GSM, an international standard for voice and data communications. There are other competing standards including code division multiple access, or CDMA, and time division multiple access, or TDMA. We also recently began offering CDMA2000 products, beginning with our 1XRTT products. In the event that GSM or any GSM-based standards do not continue to be or are not broadly adopted, or in the event that CDMA2000 products are not widely adopted, our market opportunity could be significantly limited, which would seriously harm our business.
Our sales cycle is typically long and unpredictable, making it difficult to plan our business.
Our long sales cycle requires us to invest resources in a possible transaction that may not be recovered if we do not successfully conclude the transaction. Factors that affect the length of our sales cycle include:
time required for testing and evaluation of our products and third-party products before they are deployed in a network;
time to design the network;
size of the deployment;
complexity of the customers network environment;
time for approval of the transaction with the customers internal procedures;
time for the customers internal financing process; and
the degree of system configuration necessary to deploy our products.
In addition, the emerging and evolving nature of the market for the systems we sell, and current economic conditions, may lead prospective customers to postpone their purchasing decisions. Our long and unpredictable sales cycle can result in delayed revenues, difficulty in matching revenues with expenses and increased expenditures, which together may contribute to declines in our results of operations and our share price.
Intense competition in the wireless market could prevent us from increasing or sustaining revenues or achieving or sustaining profitability.
The wireless market is rapidly evolving and is highly competitive. We cannot assure you that we will have the financial resources, technical expertise or marketing, manufacturing, distribution and support capabilities to compete successfully in the future. We expect that competition in each of our markets will increase in the future.
In the community network market, we compete against wireless local loop networks, which are wireless communication systems that connect users to the public telephone network using radio signals as a substitute for traditional telephone connections. In the wireless office network market, the primary competing standard for our systems is the digital European cordless telephone standard known as DECT.
28
We currently compete against communications equipment providers such as Alcatel, Ericsson, Lucent, Motorola, Nokia, Nortel, Siemens, Huawei and ZTE in the GSM, CDMA, TDMA, DECT and wireless local loop markets. All of the major communications equipment providers have broad product lines that include at least partial solutions that address our target markets.
We believe that our business is affected by the following competitive factors:
intense price competition;
the availability of substitute products;
ease of installation;
technical support and service;
sales and distribution capability;
breadth of product line;
conformity to industry standards; and
implementation of additional product features and enhancements.
In addition, we are seeking to sell our products in emerging markets, many of which have less reliable traditional telephone infrastructures than developed countries. If these countries improve the reliability and service of their traditional telephone networks, the demand for our products in these markets could diminish and our future revenue growth could decline. Our products may not function optimally in these markets due to the poor quality of their existing public switched telephone networks, which may be inadvertently perceived by our product users as a reflection of the quality of our products and hence, adversely affect our business.
Many of our competitors and potential competitors have substantially greater name recognition and greater technical, financial and sales and marketing resources than we have. Such competitors may undertake more extensive marketing campaigns, adopt more aggressive pricing policies and devote substantially more resources to developing new products than we can. Trends toward increased consolidation in the telecommunications industry may increase the size and resources of some of our current competitors and could affect some of our current relationships. Pricing trends in the telecommunications markets may cause our competitors to cut prices significantly in an effort to win business.
Increased competition is likely to result in price reductions, shorter product life cycles, reduced gross margins, longer sales cycles and loss of market share, any of which would seriously harm our business. We cannot assure you that we will be able to compete successfully against current or future competitors. Competitive pressures we face may cause our revenues, prices, or growth to decline and may therefore seriously harm our business and results of operations.
If we are unable to manage our global operations effectively, our business would be seriously harmed.
Substantially all of our GSM revenue to date has been derived from systems intended for installation outside of the United States. In addition to the regulatory issues, our operations are subject to the following risks and uncertainties:
legal uncertainties regarding liability, tariffs and other trade barriers;
greater difficulty in trade receivable collection, obtaining confirmed letters of credit, and longer collection periods;
costs of staffing and managing operations in several countries;
language skills and communications with our customers;
difficulties in protecting intellectual property rights;
29
changes in currency exchange rates which may make our U.S. dollar-denominated products less competitive in global markets;
the impact of recession in the global economy;
local unfavorable economic conditions; and
political and economic instability.
If we fail to improve our operational systems and controls to manage future growth, our business could be seriously harmed.
We plan to continue to expand our operations significantly to pursue existing and potential market opportunities including the market for 3G products. This growth and new technology places significant demands on our management and our operational resources. In order to manage growth effectively, we must implement and improve our operational systems, procedures and controls on a timely basis. We must strictly control costs and manage our business to achieve cash-flow breakeven in order to achieve our goals while pursuing market opportunities.
Our future success depends on the continued service of our management team and our ability to hire, retain or maintain sufficient key personnel.
Our business is highly dependent on our ability to attract, retain and motivate qualified technical and management personnel. In particular, skilled management and technical personnel are essential to the development of our 3G products. Generally, these employees are not bound by employment or non-compete agreements. Competition has been and may continue to be intense for qualified personnel in our industry and in Northern California, where most of our engineering personnel are located, and we may not be successful in attracting and retaining these personnel. Our current personnel resources are particularly limited because we have reduced the number of our employees in order to reduce our expenses. The search for a replacement for any of our key personnel could be time consuming, and could distract our management team from the day-to-day operations of our business.
Our intellectual property and proprietary rights may be insufficient to protect our competitive position.
We cannot assure you that the protection offered by our U.S. patents will be sufficient or that any of our pending U.S. or foreign patent applications will result in the issuance of patents. In addition, competitors in the United States and other countries, many of whom have substantially greater resources, may apply for and obtain patents that will prevent or interfere with our ability to make and sell our products in the United States or abroad. We have 29 issued and 17 pending U.S. patents. We have filed many of these patents internationally. We have a total of 7 issued and 18 patents pending worldwide. Unauthorized parties may attempt to design around our patents, copy or otherwise obtain and use our products. We cannot be certain that the steps we have taken will prevent unauthorized use of our technology, particularly in countries where the laws may not protect our proprietary rights as fully as in the United States. Failure to protect our proprietary rights could harm our competitive position and therefore cause our revenues and operating results to decline.
Claims that we infringe third-party intellectual property rights could result in significant expenses and restrictions on our ability to sell our products in particular markets.
From time to time, third parties may assert patent, copyright, trademark and other intellectual property rights to technologies that are important to our business. Any claims could result in costly litigation, divert the efforts of our technical and management personnel, cause product shipment delays, require us to enter into royalty or licensing agreements or prevent us from making or selling certain products. Any of these could seriously harm our operating results. Royalty or licensing agreements, if available, may not be available on commercially reasonable terms, if at all. In addition, in some of our sales agreements, we agree to indemnify our customers for any expenses or liabilities resulting from claimed infringements of patents, trademarks or copyrights of third parties. Costs associated with these indemnification obligations could be significant and could cause our operating results and stock price to decline.
We may not be able to license necessary third-party technology or it may be expensive to do so.
From time to time, we may be required to license technology from third parties to develop new products or product enhancements. We have licensed software for use in our products from Qualcomm, Inc., Lucent Technologies, TCSI Inc., Trillium Digital Systems Inc., Hughes Software Systems, Component Plus and Wind River Associates. We cannot assure you that third-party licenses will be available to us on commercially reasonable terms, if at all. The inability to obtain any third-party license required to develop new products and product enhancements could require us to obtain substitute technology of lower quality or performance standards or at greater cost which could seriously harm our competitive position, revenues and growth prospects.
30
There are a number of GSM and CDMA patents held by different companies that may impact our GSM and CDMA technology. If any of our products infringe on any of these patents and we are unable to negotiate license agreements, then we may be required to redesign a portion of our product line.
Control by our existing shareholders could discourage the potential acquisition of our business.
As of March 31, 2004, our executive officers, directors and 5% or greater shareholders and their affiliates owned approximately 4.2 million shares, or approximately 46%, of our outstanding common shares. Acting together, these shareholders may be able to control all matters requiring approval by shareholders, including the election of directors. This concentration of ownership could have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control of our business or otherwise discouraging a potential acquirer from attempting to obtain control of us, which could prevent our shareholders from realizing a premium over the market price for their common shares.
Anti-takeover provisions in our Bye-Laws and our Shareholder Rights Plan could impede an attempt to replace or remove our directors or to initiate a change of control, which could diminish the value of our common shares.
Our Bye-Laws and Shareholder Rights Plan contain provisions that may entrench directors and make it more difficult for shareholders to replace directors even if the shareholders consider it beneficial to do so or delay or prevent a change of control that a shareholder might consider favorable. Even in the absence of an attempt to effect a change in management or a takeover attempt, these provisions may adversely affect the prevailing market price of our common shares if they are viewed as discouraging takeover attempts in the future.
Our Bye-Laws contain the following provisions that could have such an effect:
election of our directors is staggered, meaning that the members of only one of three classes of our directors are selected each year; and
shareholders have limited ability to remove directors.
Our Shareholder Rights Plan contains provisions which might cause substantial dilution to a person who attempts to acquire us on terms not approved by our Board of Directors.
Our Bye-Laws provide for waiver of claims by shareholders and indemnify directors and officers.
Our Bye-Laws provide for a broad indemnification of actions of directors and officers. Under the Bye-Laws, the shareholders agree to waive claims against directors and officers for their actions in the performance of their duties, except for acts of fraud or dishonesty. These waivers will not apply to claims arising under the United States federal securities laws and will not apply to the extent that they conflict with provisions of the laws of Bermuda or with the fiduciary duties of our directors and officers.
Our operations based in Bermuda may be subject to United States taxation, which could significantly harm our business and operating results.
Except for our U.S. subsidiaries, we do not consider ourselves to be engaged in a trade or business in the United States. Our U.S. subsidiaries are subject to U.S. taxation on their worldwide income, and dividends from our U.S. subsidiaries are subject to U.S. withholding tax. We and our non-U.S. subsidiaries would, however, be subject to U.S. federal income tax on income related to the conduct of a trade or business in the United States. If we were determined to be subject to U.S. taxation, our financial results would be significantly harmed. We cannot assure you that the Internal Revenue Service will not contend that our Bermuda-based operations are engaged in a U.S. trade or business and, therefore, are subject to U.S. income taxation.
We may become subject to taxes in Bermuda after March 28, 2016, which may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and your investment.
The Bermuda Minister of Finance, under the Exempted Undertakings Tax Protection Act 1966, as amended, of Bermuda, has given us an assurance that if any legislation is enacted in Bermuda that would impose tax computed on profits or income, or computed on any capital asset, gain or appreciation, or any tax in the nature of estate duty or inheritance tax, then the imposition of any such tax will not be applicable to us or any of our operations, shares, debentures or other obligations until March 28, 2016. Given the limited duration of the Minister of Finances assurance we cannot be certain that we will not be subject to any Bermuda tax after March 28, 2016.
31
A substantial number of our common shares are available for sale in the public market simultaneously, which could cause the market price of our shares to decline.
Sales of substantial amounts of our common shares in the public market or the awareness that a large number of shares is available for sale could cause the market price of our common shares to decline. Sales of our common shares held by existing shareholders could cause the market price of our shares to decline.
Because we do not intend to pay any cash dividends on our common shares, holders of our common shares will not be able to receive a return on their shares unless they sell them.
We have never paid or declared any cash dividends on our common shares or other securities and intend to retain any future earnings to finance the development and expansion of our business. We do not anticipate paying any cash dividend on our common shares in the foreseeable future.
Our operations could be significantly hindered by the occurrence of a natural disaster or other catastrophic event.
Our manufacturing operations are susceptible to outages due to fire, floods, power loss, telecommunications failures, break-ins and similar events. In addition, the majority of our network infrastructure is located in Northern California, an area susceptible to earthquakes. Despite our implementation of network security measures, our servers are vulnerable to computer viruses, break-ins, and similar disruptions from unauthorized tampering with our computer systems. Any such event could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, and financial condition.
Terrorist acts and acts of declared or undeclared war may seriously harm our business and revenues, costs and expenses and financial condition.
Terrorist acts or acts of declared or undeclared war may cause damage or disruption to us, our employees, facilities, partners, suppliers, distributors, or customers, which could significantly impact our revenues, costs, expenses, cash flow and financial condition. The potential for future terrorist attacks, the national and international responses to terrorist attacks, and other acts of declared or undeclared war or hostility have created many economic and political uncertainties, which could adversely affect our business and results of operations in ways that cannot presently be predicted. Additionally, we are predominantly uninsured for losses and interruptions caused by terrorist acts and acts of declared or undeclared war.
We have recorded impairment losses in the past and any future impairment of long-lived assets could have a material adverse impact on our financial conditions and results of operations.
Our long-lived assets include intangible assets as a result of our purchasing of assets or businesses. Any further impairment losses recorded in the future caused by the continuing deterioration of the industry we operate in could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations.
32
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Foreign Exchange
Our financial market risk includes risks associated with international operations and related foreign currencies, as we anticipate that international sales will continue to account for a significant portion of our consolidated revenue. While our international sales are in U.S. dollars and are therefore not subject to foreign currency exchange risk, expenses of our international operations are denominated in each countrys local currency and are affected by foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. We do not engage in any hedging activity in connection with our international business or foreign currency risk.
Through March 31, 2004, we have not experienced any significant negative impact on our operations as a result of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. Moreover, based on our overall currency rate exposures, a near-term 10% appreciation or depreciation of the values of the relevant foreign currencies from the values as of March 31, 2004 would have a $0.2 million impact on the balance sheet, but would have no material impact on our results of operations and cash flows over the next twelve months.
Interest Rates
We invest our cash in financial instruments, including commercial paper, and repurchase agreements, and in money market funds. These investments are denominated in U.S. dollars. Cash balances in foreign currencies overseas are operating balances and are only invested in short term deposits of the local operating bank.
Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to our investment portfolio and outstanding debt obligations. We do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes. Our investments, which currently yield approximately 0.1% annual interest, consist primarily of highly liquid debt instruments that are of high-quality investment grade and mature in one year or less, as specified in our investment policy. The policy also limits the amount of credit exposure to any one issue, issuer and type of instrument.
Due to the short-term nature of our investments, a hypothetical 10% change in interest rates from those as of March 31, 2004 would not have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows over the next twelve months.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. Our management evaluated, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-Q. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms.
Changes in internal control over financial reporting. There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II: OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
On November 21, 2001, interWAVE and various of its officers and directors were named as defendants in Middleton v. interWAVE Communications International Ltd., et al., Case No. 01-CV-10598, a purported securities class action lawsuit filed in United States District Court, Southern District of New York. On April 19, 2002, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint. The amended complaint asserts that the prospectus from interWAVEs January 28, 2000 initial public offering (IPO) failed to disclose certain alleged improper actions by various underwriters for the offering in the allocation of IPO shares. The amended complaint alleges claims against certain underwriters, interWAVE and its officers and directors under the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Similar complaints have been filed concerning more than 300 other IPOs and these cases have been coordinated as In re Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation, 21 MC 92.
33
On July 15, 2002, the issuers filed an omnibus motion to dismiss for failure to comply with applicable pleading standards. On October 8, 2002, the Court entered an Order of Dismissal as to all of the individual defendants in the IPO litigation, without prejudice. On February 19, 2003, the Court denied the motion to dismiss against interWAVE.
A committee of interWAVE's Board of Directors has accepted a proposal to settle and release claims against the issuer defendants, including interWAVE. The settlement is subject to a number of conditions, including approval of the court. If the settlement does not occur, and litigation against interWAVE continues, interWAVE believes it has meritorious defenses and intends to defend the action vigorously. These legal proceedings may be time consuming and expensive and the outcome could be adverse to interWAVE. An adverse outcome could have a material adverse effect on interWAVEs financial position, on its business and results of operations.
interWAVE may from time to time become a party to various legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business.
ITEM 2. CHANGES IN SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
None.
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
None.
None.
34
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) Exhibits
EXHIBIT |
|
EXHIBIT DESCRIPTION |
|
|
|
3.2 (1) |
|
Amended and Restated Bye-Laws of the Registrant |
|
|
|
3.3 (1) |
|
Memorandum of Association |
|
|
|
4.2 (2) |
|
Preferred Share Rights Agreement dated December 2, 2003 |
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended |
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended |
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
(1) Incorporated by reference to the same numbered exhibits filed with Registrants Registration Statement on Form F-1 (File No. 333-92967), as amended on January 28, 2000.
(2) Incorporated by reference to the same numbered exhibit filed with the Registrants report on Form 8-K on December 18, 2003.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
On January 28, 2004, interWAVE furnished a report on Form 8-K pursuant to Item 12, Disclosure of Results of Operations and Financial Condition, announcing its financial results for the second fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2003.
On March 10, 2004, interWAVE filed a report on Form 8-K pursuant to Item 5, Other Events and Regulation FD Disclosure, announcing interWAVEs filing of an amended report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2003 and notification from the NASDAQ Stock Market that its listing on the NASDAQ National Market was under review.
On March 25, 2004, interWAVE filed a report on Form 8-K pursuant to Item 5, Other Events and Regulation FD Disclosure, announcing interWAVEs agreement with AT&T Wireless Services.
On March 31, 2004, interWAVE filed a report on Form 8-K pursuant to Item 4, Change in Registrants Certifying Accountants, announcing the resignation of KPMG LLP as its independent auditor.
35
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized,
Date: May 14, 2004 |
interWAVE Communications International Ltd. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ ERWIN F. LEICHTLE |
|
|
|
Erwin F. Leichtle |
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ CAL R. HOAGLAND |
|
|
|
Cal R. Hoagland |
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
36
INTERWAVE COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL LTD.
EXHIBIT INDEX
EXHIBIT |
|
EXHIBIT DESCRIPTION |
|
|
|
3.2 (1) |
|
Amended and Restated Bye-Laws of the Registrant |
|
|
|
3.3 (1) |
|
Memorandum of Association |
|
|
|
4.2 (2) |
|
Preferred Share Rights Agreement dated December 2, 2003 |
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended |
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended |
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
(1) Incorporated by reference to the same numbered exhibits filed with Registrants Registration Statement on Form F-1 (File No. 333-92967), as amended on January 28, 2000.
(2) Incorporated by reference to the same numbered exhibit filed with the Registrants report on Form 8-K on December 18, 2003.