UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
ý QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d)
OF THE SECURITITES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2004
OR
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission File number 000-30654
APROPOS TECHNOLOGY, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Illinois |
|
36-3644751 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
One Tower Lane, 28th Floor |
||
Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois 60181 |
||
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code) |
||
|
|
|
(630) 472-9600 |
||
(Registrants telephone number, including area code) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o No ý
The number of shares outstanding of the registrants Common Shares, par value $0.01 per share, as of April 23, 2004, was 17,268,866.
APROPOS TECHNOLOGY, INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
Part I. Financial Information.
Item 1. Financial Statements.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
In thousands, except share and per share amounts
|
|
March 31 |
|
December 31 |
|
||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
(Note 1) |
|
||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current assets : |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
38,798 |
|
$ |
38,265 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
1,510 |
|
1,000 |
|
||
Accounts receivable, less allowances for doubtful accounts of $265 at March 31, 2004 and $265 at December 31, 2003 |
|
3,030 |
|
2,895 |
|
||
Inventory |
|
55 |
|
73 |
|
||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
740 |
|
588 |
|
||
Total current assets |
|
44,133 |
|
42,821 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Equipment, net |
|
752 |
|
921 |
|
||
Other assets |
|
19 |
|
199 |
|
||
Total assets |
|
$ |
44,904 |
|
$ |
43,941 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current liabilities : |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
40 |
|
$ |
81 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
965 |
|
1,179 |
|
||
Accrued compensation and related accruals |
|
414 |
|
377 |
|
||
Accrued restructuring, current portion |
|
437 |
|
438 |
|
||
Advance payments from customers |
|
143 |
|
186 |
|
||
Deferred revenues |
|
4,003 |
|
3,296 |
|
||
Total current liabilities |
|
6,002 |
|
5,557 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Accrued restructuring, less current portion |
|
459 |
|
560 |
|
||
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Shareholders equity : |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Preferred shares, $0.01 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Common shares, $0.01 par value, 60,000,000 shares authorized, 17,260,431 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2004; 17,257,225 issued and 16, 946,114 outstanding at December 31, 2003 |
|
173 |
|
173 |
|
||
Additional paid-in capital |
|
102,475 |
|
102,263 |
|
||
Treasury stock, at cost |
|
|
|
(392 |
) |
||
Accumulated deficit |
|
(64,205 |
) |
(64,220 |
) |
||
Total shareholders equity |
|
38,443 |
|
37,824 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
44,904 |
|
$ |
43,941 |
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
In thousands, except per share amounts
|
|
Quarter ended March 31 |
|
||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Software licenses |
|
$ |
1,987 |
|
$ |
2,061 |
|
Services and other |
|
3,173 |
|
3,096 |
|
||
Total revenue |
|
5,160 |
|
5,157 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cost of goods and services |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cost of software |
|
170 |
|
70 |
|
||
Cost of services and other |
|
852 |
|
1,157 |
|
||
Total cost of goods and services |
|
1,022 |
|
1,227 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Gross margin |
|
4,138 |
|
3,930 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Sales and marketing |
|
1,674 |
|
2,284 |
|
||
Research and development |
|
1,052 |
|
1,695 |
|
||
General and administrative |
|
1,096 |
|
1,567 |
|
||
Stock compensation charge |
|
|
|
75 |
|
||
Restructuring and other charges |
|
368 |
|
448 |
|
||
Total operating expenses |
|
4,190 |
|
6,069 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Loss from operations |
|
(52 |
) |
(2,139 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Other income (expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Interest income |
|
95 |
|
160 |
|
||
Other, net |
|
(28 |
) |
8 |
|
||
Total other income |
|
67 |
|
168 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
15 |
|
$ |
(1,971 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net income (loss) per share |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Basic |
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
$ |
(0.12 |
) |
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
$ |
(0.12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Basic |
|
17,104 |
|
16,675 |
|
||
Diluted |
|
18,537 |
|
16,675 |
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
In thousands
|
|
Quarter ended March 31 |
|
||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
15 |
|
$ |
(1,971 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities : |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
131 |
|
318 |
|
||
Provision for doubtful accounts |
|
|
|
27 |
|
||
Stock compensation charge |
|
|
|
75 |
|
||
Non-cash restructuring charge |
|
332 |
|
|
|
||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities : |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Accounts receivable |
|
(135 |
) |
(233 |
) |
||
Inventory |
|
17 |
|
(73 |
) |
||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
(152 |
) |
(126 |
) |
||
Other assets |
|
11 |
|
15 |
|
||
Accounts payable |
|
(41 |
) |
90 |
|
||
Accrued expenses |
|
(214 |
) |
(135 |
) |
||
Accrued compensation and related accruals |
|
37 |
|
(250 |
) |
||
Accrued restructuring |
|
(160 |
) |
|
|
||
Advanced payments from customers |
|
(43 |
) |
(21 |
) |
||
Deferred revenue |
|
707 |
|
693 |
|
||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
505 |
|
(1,591 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Maturities and sales of short-term investments |
|
|
|
13,682 |
|
||
Purchases of short-term investments |
|
(509 |
) |
(5,470 |
) |
||
Purchases of equipment |
|
(67 |
) |
(20 |
) |
||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
(576 |
) |
8,192 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Proceeds from exercise of options |
|
604 |
|
25 |
|
||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
604 |
|
25 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
533 |
|
6,626 |
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
38,265 |
|
19,333 |
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
38,798 |
|
$ |
25,959 |
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
1. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions for Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States have been condensed, or omitted, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). In managements opinion, the statements include all adjustments necessary (which are of a normal and recurring nature) for the fair presentation of the results of the interim periods presented.
The balance sheet at December 31, 2003, has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements.
These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Companys audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2003, included with its Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 30, 2004. The results of operations for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations to be expected for any other interim period or for the full fiscal year.
2. Income or Loss Per Share
Basic net income or loss per share is based upon the net income or loss and upon the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per common share adjusts for the effect of common share equivalents, such as stock options and stock warrants, net of assumed repurchases, only in the periods presented in which such effect would have been dilutive. Diluted net loss per share is not presented separately, as the effect of the common share equivalents is anti-dilutive for the respective period presented. Accordingly, diluted net loss per share is the same as basic net loss per share.
|
|
Three
months |
|
||||
in thousands, except per share amounts |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||
Basic Income (loss) per share |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
15 |
|
$ |
(1,971 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Weighted average shares outstanding |
|
17,104 |
|
16,675 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Income (loss) per share |
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
$ |
(0.12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Diluted Income per share |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net income |
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Weighted average shares outstanding |
|
17,104 |
|
|
|
||
Assumed option exercises |
|
1,419 |
|
|
|
||
Assumed warrant exercises |
|
14 |
|
|
|
||
Weighted average shares outstanding, as adjusted |
|
18,537 |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Diluted income per share |
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
|
6
3. Stock based compensation
The Company has elected to determine the value of stock-based compensation arrangements under the provisions of Accounting Principles Board, or APB, Opinion No. 25 Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. The pro forma disclosures required under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards, or SFAS, No. 148, Accounting for Stock Based Compensation Transition and Disclosurean Amendment of SFAS, No. 123 are included below. SFAS, No. 123, Accounting for Stock Based Compensation permits the use of either a fair value based method or the intrinsic value method to measure the expense associated with stock-based compensation arrangements.
In accordance with the interim disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 148, the pro forma effect on the Companys net income (loss) had compensation expense been recorded for the first quarter of 2004 and 2003, respectively, as determined under the fair value method, is shown below.
|
|
Three
months |
|
||||
in thousands, except per share amounts |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net income (loss), as reported |
|
$ |
15 |
|
$ |
(1,971 |
) |
Add: Stock-based employee compensation expense included in reported net income (loss) |
|
|
|
75 |
|
||
Less: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under the fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects |
|
(204 |
) |
(373 |
) |
||
Net loss, pro forma |
|
$ |
(189 |
) |
$ |
(2,269 |
) |
Basic net income (loss) per share, as reported |
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
$ |
(0.12 |
) |
Basic net loss per share, pro forma |
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
Diluted net income per share, as reported |
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
|
Options to purchase 2,417,379 Common Shares with exercise prices of $0.10 to $22.00 per share were outstanding as of March 31, 2004, and options to purchase 2,742,002 Common Shares with exercise prices of $0.10 to $22.00 per share were outstanding as of March 31, 2003.
4. Geographic Information
Revenues derived from customers outside of North America accounted for 19.1% and 27.1% of the Companys total revenues in the quarters ended March 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
The Company attributes its revenues to countries based on the country in which the client is located. The Companys long-lived assets located outside the United States are not considered material.
5. Litigation and contingencies
In November 2001, the Company was named as a defendant in several shareholder class action litigations that have been filed in federal court in Chicago against the Company, certain of its current and former directors and officers, and the underwriters of the Companys initial public offering. These litigations are allegedly brought on behalf of purchasers of the Companys stock, and assert that the Company violated the federal securities laws by making misstatements and omissions in its Registration Statement and Prospectus in connection with the Companys initial public offering in February 2000. The plaintiffs seek unspecified damages. In April 2002 an amended consolidated complaint was filed which supersedes the original, separate complaints. On February 25, 2004, the Company along with all other defendants, signed an agreement in principle to settle this litigation in consideration of a payment of $4.5 million, to be paid by the Companys insurer. No settlement monies will be due from the Company itself. The settlement documents have been filed with the Court, and on May 6, 2004, the Court preliminarily approved their form. Consummation of the proposed settlement is conditioned upon, among other things, negotiating, executing, and filing with the Court final settlement documents, and final approval by the Court. If the proposed settlement described above is not consummated, the Company intends to defend the litigation vigorously.
7
The Company has been named as a nominal defendant in a shareholder derivative action filed in February 2002 against certain of its present and former directors and officers. The complaint alleges, among other things, that the alleged conduct challenged in the securities cases pending against the Company in Chicago (described above) constitutes a breach of the defendants fiduciary duties to the Company. The complaint seeks unspecified money damages and other relief ostensibly on behalf of the Company. In August 2002, the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint. The court has entered an order staying the action in its entirety pending the outcome of the above-described securities cases in Chicago. Although legal proceedings are inherently uncertain and their ultimate outcome cannot be predicted with certainty, the Company believes the allegations are without merit and intends to defend the litigation vigorously.
In November 2001, the Company was named as a defendant in shareholder class action litigation that has been filed in federal court in New York City against the Company and certain of its current and former officers and the underwriters of the Companys initial public offering (IPO). This lawsuit alleges, among other things, that the underwriters of the Companys IPO improperly required their customers to pay the underwriters excessive commissions and to agree to buy additional shares of the Companys stock in the aftermarket as conditions of receiving shares in the Companys IPO. The lawsuit further claims that these supposed practices of the underwriters should have been disclosed in the Companys IPO prospectus and registration statement. In April 2002, an amended complaint was filed which, like the original complaint, alleges violations of the registration and antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws and seeks unspecified damages. The Company understands that various other plaintiffs have filed substantially similar class action cases against approximately 300 other publicly traded companies and their public offering underwriters in New York City, which along with the case against the Company have all been transferred to a single federal district judge for purposes of coordinated case management. In July 2002, the Company, together with the other issuers named as defendants in these coordinated proceedings, filed a collective motion to dismiss the consolidated amended complaints against them on various legal grounds common to all or most of the issuer defendants. In October 2002, the Court approved a stipulation providing for the dismissal of the individual defendants without prejudice. In February 2003, the Court issued a decision granting in part and denying in part the motion to dismiss the litigation filed by the Company and the other issuer defendants. The claims against the Company under the antifraud provisions of the securities laws were dismissed with prejudice; the claims under the registration provisions of the securities laws were not dismissed as to the Company or virtually any other issuer defendant.
In June 2003, the Company elected to participate in a proposed settlement agreement with the plaintiffs in this litigation. If ultimately approved by the Court, this proposed settlement would result in a dismissal, with prejudice, of all claims in the litigation against the Company and against any of the other issuer defendants who elect to participate in the proposed settlement, together with the current or former officers and directors of participating issuers who were named as individual defendants. The proposed settlement does not provide for the resolution of any claims against the underwriter defendants, and the litigation as against those defendants is continuing. The proposed settlement provides that the class members in the class action cases brought against the participating issuer defendants will be guaranteed a recovery of $1 billion by insurers of the participating issuer defendants. If recoveries totaling $1 billion or more are obtained by the class members from the underwriter defendants, however, the monetary obligations to the class members under the proposed settlement will be satisfied. In addition, the Company and any other participating issuer defendants will be required to assign to the class members certain claims that they may have against the underwriters of their IPOs.
The proposed settlement contemplates that any amounts necessary to fund the settlement or settlement-related expenses would come from participating issuers directors and officers liability insurance policy proceeds as opposed to funds of the participating issuer defendants themselves. A participating issuer defendant could be required to contribute to the costs of the settlement if that issuers insurance coverage were insufficient to pay that issuers allocable share of the settlement costs. The Company expects that its insurance proceeds will be sufficient for these purposes and that it will not otherwise be required to contribute to the proposed settlement. Consummation of the proposed settlement is conditioned upon, among other things, negotiating, executing, and filing with the Court final settlement documents, and final approval by the Court. If the proposed settlement described above is not consummated, the Company intends to continue to defend the litigation vigorously. Moreover, if the proposed settlement is not consummated, the Company believes that the underwriters may have an obligation to indemnify it for the legal fees and other costs of defending this suit.
While the Company cannot guarantee the outcome of the above proceedings, the Company believes that the final result of these actions will have no material effect on its consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
8
The Company is a party in various other disputes and litigation that have arisen in the course of the Companys business. In the opinion of management, although legal proceedings can not be predicted with certainty, the ultimate outcome of these disputes and lawsuits are not expected to have a material impact on the Companys financial condition or results of operations, or cash flows.
6. Restructuring and other charges
In the first quarter of 2004, the Company recorded a charge of $368,000. In late January 2004, the U.K. operations moved into new premises that are more suitable for their current staffing levels. The old facility, which had a lease through March 2005, was in use until the move. The U.K. lease termination charge of approximately $309,000, consisted of forfeiture of the rent deposit, abandonment of assets, and other direct disposal costs. Additionally, the Company recorded an adjustment of $59,000 for the reserve related to the consolidation of the corporate headquarters. This adjustment is due to the fact the Company has been unable to find a tenant to sublet the excess facility space and thereby delayed the start of anticipated sublet income by three months.
In the first quarter of 2003, the Company recorded a charge of $448,000. This charge related to staff reductions of 30 persons.
A summary of the restructuring and other charge, is as follows:
In thousands |
|
Employee |
|
Facility |
|
Asset |
|
Other |
|
Total |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Balance as of December 31, 2002 |
|
396 |
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
420 |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
2003 Provision |
|
448 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
448 |
|
|||||
2003 Adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
2003 Cash Payments |
|
(613 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
(622 |
) |
|||||
2003 Non-cash charge offs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Balance as of March 31, 2003 |
|
$ |
229 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
15 |
|
$ |
246 |
|
In thousands |
|
Employee |
|
Facility |
|
Asset |
|
Other |
|
Total |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Balance as of December 31, 2003 |
|
$ |
6 |
|
$ |
981 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
11 |
|
$ |
998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
2004 Provision |
|
|
|
205 |
|
104 |
|
|
|
309 |
|
|||||
2004 Adjustments |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
|
|
59 |
|
|||||
2004 Cash Payments |
|
|
|
(197 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(197 |
) |
|||||
2004 Non-cash charge offs |
|
|
|
(169 |
) |
(104 |
) |
|
|
(273 |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Balance as of March 31, 2004 |
|
$ |
6 |
|
$ |
879 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
11 |
|
$ |
896 |
|
Included in Accrued restructuring at March 31, 2004 is approximately $17,000 related to the staff reductions in the third quarter of 2002, which the Company estimates will be disbursed over the next quarter. The remaining $879,000, of which $459,000 is classified as non-current, related to the facility termination costs, which the Company estimates will be disbursed over remaining life of the lease through the second quarter of 2006.
9
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Except for historical information, the matters discussed in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are forward-looking statements made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements described in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements are based on the Companys current expectations and are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties, and assumptions relating to the Companys operations, financial condition, and results of operations. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should the underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may differ significantly from results expressed or implied in any forward-looking statement made by the Company in this Quarterly Report. These and other risks are detailed under the caption Risk Factors Associated with Apropos Business and Future Operating Results in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company does not undertake any obligation to revise these forward-looking statements to reflect future events or circumstances.
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Companys condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report.
Overview
The Company develops, markets, and supports a leading real-time, multi-channel interaction management application for managing customer interactions across a variety of communications media, including E-mail, Fax, Web, and Voice. The Companys solution enhances customer relationship management applications, such as sales, marketing, and service, through intelligent, value-based management of all interactions.
The Companys operations commenced in January 1989, and, from inception to early 1995, operating activities consisted primarily of research and development and consulting. As an integral part of the Companys growth strategy, during February 2000, the Company completed an initial public offering of 3,977,500 Common Shares (the IPO) resulting in net proceeds to the Company of approximately $79.3 million.
Revenue. The Company recognizes revenue from the sale of software upon delivery. The Company recognizes revenue from fees for professional services when they are completed. The Company recognizes support and maintenance services ratably over the term of its maintenance contracts, which are typically annual contracts. Training services are recognized as such services are completed.
The Company derives revenue principally from the sale of software licenses and from fees for implementation, technical support, and training services.
The Company markets its solution to its customers primarily through its direct sales force, value-added resellers, and original equipment manufacturers, or OEMs, in North America, Europe, South America, Asia, Africa, and Australia. Revenue generated via resellers and OEMs accounted for 36.8%, and 27.4% of the Companys total revenue for the first quarter of 2004 and 2003, respectively. Management expects that revenue derived from sales to resellers and OEMs may increase as a percentage of total revenue as the Company expands its product capabilities and focuses its sales efforts on its distribution channels.
The Company relies on its customers and resellers to submit purchase orders for its product and services. In addition, the Company enters into general sales contracts with its customers and resellers; however, none of its customers or resellers is obligated to purchase its product or its services pursuant to these contracts. All of the Companys sales contracts contain provisions regarding the following:
product features and pricing;
order dates, rescheduling, and cancellations;
warranties and repair procedures; and
support and training obligations.
10
Typically, these contracts provide that the exclusive remedy for breach of the Companys specified warranty is either a refund of the price paid or modification of the product to satisfy the warranty.
The Company has generally experienced a product sales cycle of six to nine months. The Company considers the life of the sales cycle to begin on the first face-to-face meeting with the prospective customer and end when product is shipped. The length of the sales cycle for customer orders depends on a number of factors including:
a customers awareness of the capabilities of the type of solutions Apropos sells and the amount of customer education required;
concerns that the Companys customer may have about its limited operating history and track record and the Companys size compared to many of its larger competitors;
a customers budgetary constraints;
the timing of a customers budget cycles;
concerns of the Companys customer about the introduction of new products by the Company or its competitors that would render its current product noncompetitive or obsolete; and
downturns in general economic conditions, including reductions in demand for contact center services.
The Companys OEM contracts contain additional provisions regarding product technical specifications, labeling instructions, and other instructions regarding customization and rebranding. The Companys OEM contracts contain volume discounts.
Sales to customers outside the United States accounted for 19.1% and 27.1% of the Companys total revenue during the first quarter of 2004 and 2003, respectively. Management expects the portion of the Companys total revenue derived from sales to customers outside the United States to be comparable in the foreseeable future.
Cost of goods and services. Cost of goods and services consists primarily of:
payments for third party software used with the Companys product;
the cost of compensation for technical support, education, and professional services personnel;
other costs related to facilities and office equipment for technical support, education, and professional services personnel; and
the cost of reimbursable travel included in revenue.
The Company recognizes costs of software, implementation services, support and training services as they are incurred.
Operating expenses. The Company generally recognizes its operating expenses as they are incurred. Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of compensation, commission, and travel expenses along with other marketing expenses, including trade shows, public relations, telemarketing campaigns, and other promotional expenses. Research and development expenses consist primarily of compensation expenses for personnel and, to a lesser extent, independent contractors. General and administrative expenses consist primarily of compensation for administrative, financial, and information technology personnel and a number of non-allocable costs, including professional fees, legal fees, accounting fees, and bad debts.
The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts to reflect the expected uncollectability of accounts receivable based on past collection history and specific risks identified among uncollected accounts. Accounts receivable are charged to the allowance for doubtful accounts when the Company has determined that the receivable will not be collected. Accounts receivable balances are determined to be delinquent when the amount is past due based on the contractual terms with the customer.
Other income and expenses. Other income and expense relates primarily to interest earned and/or owed. Interest income is generated by the investment of cash raised in rounds of equity financing, most notably the IPO in February 2000. Interest expense is generated primarily from outstanding debt and certain capitalized obligations, including any capital leases.
11
Income taxes. The Company provides for income taxes under the liability method, which requires recognition of deferred tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, a valuation allowance is required against net deferred tax assets if, based upon the available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Management evaluates the recoverability of the deferred tax assets and the level of the valuation allowance. At such time as it is determined that it is more likely than not that deferred tax assets are realizable, the valuation allowance will be appropriately reduced.
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the percentage of total revenue represented by certain items included in the Companys Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations in the condensed consolidated financial statements. Percentages are calculated from operating results rounded to the nearest thousand and may not equal calculations from the numbers referenced below in this section which may be rounded to the nearest hundred thousand. Operating performance for any period is not necessarily indicative of performance for any future periods.
|
|
Quarter ended March 31 |
|
||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
Software licenses |
|
38.5 |
% |
40.0 |
% |
Services and other |
|
61.5 |
|
60.0 |
|
Total revenue |
|
100.0 |
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs of goods and services |
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of software |
|
3.3 |
|
1.4 |
|
Cost of services and other |
|
16.5 |
|
22.4 |
|
Total costs of goods and services |
|
19.8 |
|
23.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
80.2 |
|
76.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing |
|
32.4 |
|
44.3 |
|
Research and development |
|
20.4 |
|
32.9 |
|
General and administrative |
|
21.2 |
|
30.3 |
|
Stock compensation charge |
|
0.0 |
|
1.5 |
|
Restructuring and other charges |
|
7.2 |
|
8.7 |
|
Total operating expenses |
|
81.2 |
|
117.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss |
|
(1.0 |
) |
(41.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense) |
|
1.3 |
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (loss) |
|
0.3 |
% |
(38.2 |
)% |
Quarter Ended March 31, 2004, Compared to Quarter Ended March 31, 2003
Revenue. Revenue remained relatively unchanged at $5.2 million in the quarter ended March 31, 2004, from $5.2 million in the quarter ended March 31, 2003.
Revenue from software licenses decreased 3.6% to $2.0 million in the quarter ended March 31, 2004, from $2.1 million in the quarter ended March 31, 2003. The Company primarily attributes this decrease in software revenue to fewer new customers added in the first quarter of 2004 compared to the first quarter of 2003.
Revenue from services and other, consisting of professional services, customer support and rebillable costs, increased 2.5% to $3.2 million in the quarter ended March 31, 2004, from $3.1 million in the quarter ended March 31, 2003. An increase in customer support revenue to $2.4 in the first quarter of 2004 from $2.2 million in the first quarter of 2003 as a result of the Companys expanding customer base was partially offset by lower professional services revenue due to fewer customers purchasing new systems.
12
Gross margin. Gross margins improved to 80.2% of total revenue in the quarter ended March 31, 2004, from 76.2% of total revenue in the quarter ended March 31, 2003. This improvement is due primarily to improved implementation and customer staff support utilization, and was partially offset by higher costs of third party software used in conjunction with the Companys software.
Gross margins from software licenses decreased to 91.4% of software revenue in the quarter ended March 31, 2004 from 96.6% of software revenue in the quarter ended March 31, 2003. Product costs consist primarily of third party software used in conjunction with the Companys software.
Gross margin from services and other represented 73.1% of services and other revenue in the quarter ended March 31, 2004, and 62.6% of services and other revenue in the quarter ended March 31, 2003. This improvement is due to improved implementation and customer staff support utilization.
Operating expenses. Operating expenses decreased 31.0% to $4.2 million in the quarter ended March 31, 2004, from $6.1 million in the quarter ended March 31, 2003. This decrease primarily reflects lower staffing levels in the first quarter 2004 compared to the first quarter 2003. Total operating headcount decreased by 26.5% to 72 employees at March 31, 2004, from 98 employees at March 31, 2003. As a percentage of total revenue, operating expenses were 81.2% in the first quarter ended March 31, 2004, and 117.7% in the first quarter ended March 31, 2003.
Sales and marketing expenses decreased 26.7% to $1.7 million in the first quarter ended March 31, 2004, from $2.3 million in the first quarter ended March 31, 2003. The decrease in sales and marketing expenses resulted primarily from lower personnel costs, as a result of fewer personnel, and streamlined marketing programs.
Research and development expenses decreased 37.9% to $1.1 million in the first quarter ended March 31, 2004, from $1.7 million in the first quarter ended March 31, 2003. The decrease in research and development expenses related primarily from reductions in personnel.
General and administrative expenses decreased 30.1% to $1.1 million in the first quarter ended March 31, 2004, from $1.6 million in the first quarter ended March 31, 2003. The decreases in general and administrative expenses were primarily due to lower facility costs related to the consolidation of the corporate facility, lower legal fees, lower insurance costs and lower personnel costs, as a result of fewer personnel.
Stock compensation charge decreased 100% to $0 in the first quarter ended March 31, 2004, from $75,000 in the first quarter ended March 31, 2003. The decrease was due to all options issued prior to the IPO have become fully vested. Stock compensation charge represents the difference at the grant date between the exercise price and the pre-IPO deemed fair value of the Common Shares underlying the options. This amount is being amortized over the vesting period of the individual options, which is typically four years.
Restructuring and other charges. In the first quarter of 2004, the Company recorded a charge of $368,000. In late January 2004, the U.K. operations moved into new premises that are more suitable for their current staffing levels. The old facility, which had a lease through March 2005, was in use until the move. The U.K. lease termination charge of approximately $309,000, consisted of forfeiture of the rent deposit, abandonment of assets, and other direct disposal costs. Additionally, the Company recorded an adjustment of $59,000 for the reserve related to the consolidation of the corporate headquarters. This adjustment is due to the fact the Company has been unable to find a tenant to sublet the excess facility space and thereby delayed the start of anticipated sublet income by three months. In the first quarter of 2003, the Company recorded a charge of $448,000. This charge related to staff reductions of 30 persons.
Other income and expense. Interest income was $95,000 in the first quarter ended March 31, 2004, and $160,000 in the first quarter ended March 31, 2003. The decrease in interest income is a result of lower cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investment balances and a decline in investment yields.
Income taxes. There has been no provision or benefit for income taxes for any period since 1995 due to the Companys operating losses. At March 31, 2004, the Company had approximately $52.3 million of domestic operating loss carryforwards for federal income tax purposes, which expire beginning in 2011through 2023. Based on Internal Revenue Code regulations relating to changes in ownership in the Company, utilization of a portion of the net
13
operating loss carryforwards is subject to annual limitations. At March 31, 2004, the Company had foreign operating losses of approximately $8.8 million, which may be limited. The Companys use of these net operating losses may be limited in future periods.
Net income(loss). The Company recorded its second consecutive quarterly profit in the three months ended March 31, 2004. The net income for the three months ended March 31, 2004 was $15,000, which included a restructuring charge of $368,000. The Company recorded a net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2003 of $2.0 million, which included a restructuring charge of $448,000. The change is due to an increase in gross margin and lower operating expenses.
The Companys operating activities resulted in net cash inflows of $0.5 million in the first quarter of 2004 compared to net cash outflows of $1.6 million in the first quarter of 2003. The operating cash inflows for the first quarter of 2004 resulted primarily from the seasonal increase in deferred revenue billings, offset to a lesser extent by increases in prepaid expenses and accounts receivable. The operating cash outflows for the first quarter of 2003 resulted from net losses experienced along with increases in prepaid expenses and accounts receivable, offset by an increase in deferred revenue billings.
The Companys investing activities resulted in net cash outflows of $0.6 million in the first quarter of 2004 and net cash inflows of $8.2 million in the first quarter of 2003. The net outflows in the first quarter of 2004 were the result of the purchase of short-term investments and capital expenditures. The net cash inflow in the first quarter of 2003 was primarily the decision by management to reduce the length of maturity on the Companys investments. The decision caused many investments to be classified as cash and cash equivalents instead of short-term investments. This inflow was offset by capital expenditures in the first quarter of 2003.
Financing activities generated $604,000 and $25,000 in cash in the first quarter of March 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. These funds were generated from proceeds received from stock option exercises.
As of March 31, 2004, the Company had no long-term obligations other than operating leases related to facilities utilized by the Company. The following table summarizes the minimum lease payments for these operating leases as of March 31, 2004:
in thousands |
|
Operating leases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Through March 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
1,403 |
|
Through March 31, 2006 |
|
1,384 |
|
|
Through March 31, 2007 |
|
215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,002 |
|
The Company believes that its capital requirements, in large part, depend on future results of operations and, ultimately, achievement of profitability. The Company expects to devote resources to research and development efforts, to expand sales channels and marketing lead generation programs, to fund capital expenditures, and to provide for working capital and other general corporate purposes. Management believes that the existing cash and short-term investment balances will be sufficient to meet the working capital and capital expenditure requirements for at least the next twelve months.
14
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
Interest Rate Risk
The Companys exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relate primarily to the change in the amount of interest income the Company can earn on its investments. The Company does not use derivative financial instruments in its investment portfolio. The Company had short-term investments of $1.5 million at March 31, 2004. The Companys short-term investments consist primarily of government agency bonds. The Company considers all investments with original maturities of less than one year, but greater than 90 days from the respective balance sheet date to be short-term investments. These investments are subject to interest rate risk and will fall in value if market interest rates increase. The Company believes a hypothetical increase in market interest rates by 10.0% from levels at December 31, 2003, would cause the fair value of these short-term investments to fall by an immaterial amount. Since the Company is not required to sell these investments before maturity, the Company has the ability to avoid realizing losses on these investments due to a sudden change in market interest rates. On the other hand, declines in the interest rates over time will reduce interest income.
Foreign Currency Risk
The Company develops products in the United States and sells these products in North America, Europe, South America, Asia, Africa, and Australia. As a result, its financial results could be affected by various factors, including changes in foreign currency exchange rates or weak economic conditions in foreign markets. As sales are generally made in U.S. dollars or British pound sterling, a strengthening of the dollar or pound could make the Companys products less competitive in foreign markets. Given the level of income the Company currently derives from its foreign operations, the Company considers this exposure to be minimal. The Company believes a 10.0% change in exchange rates would not have a significant impact on its future earnings.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
The Companys management, with the participation of the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act) as of March 31, 2004. Based on this evaluation, the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of March 31, 2004, the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were (1) designed to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report was being prepared and (2) effective, in that they provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms.
No change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) occurred during the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2004 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
15
See Note 4 to the Companys unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in Item 1 Part I of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, which is hereby incorporated by reference.
Item 2. Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds.
Not applicable.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
Not applicable.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
Not applicable.
Item 5. Other Information.
Not applicable.
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K.
(a) The following exhibits are included herein:
31.1 Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2 Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1 Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
(b) The Company did not file any reports on Form 8-K during the quarter ended March 31, 2004.
A Form 8-K, dated February 9, 2004 was furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission, but not filed therewith, on February 3, 2004 in response to Items 7, 9 and 12 to furnish a press release announcing the Companys financial results for the quarter ended December 31, 2003 and to furnish supplemental information related thereto.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on May 14, 2004.
|
Apropos Technology, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/FRANCIS J. LEONARD |
|
|
Francis J. Leonard |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer and Vice President |
|
|
(Principal Financial Officer and Authorized Officer) |
16