U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
ý Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004.
o Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
CoBiz Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
COLORADO |
|
84-0826324 |
(State or other jurisdiction of |
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization) |
|
Identification No.) |
|
821 l7th Street |
|
|
|
Denver, CO |
|
80202 |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
|
(303) 293-2265
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
Yes ý No o
There were 21,724,433 shares of the registrants Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share, outstanding as of April 28, 2004.
CoBiz Inc.
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Legal Proceedings |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
|
|
|
Item 4. |
|
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
|
|
|
Item 5. |
|
Other Information |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
CoBiz Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Condition
March 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
(Audited) |
|
||
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
||||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
34,406 |
|
$ |
34,659 |
|
Investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Investment securities available for sale (cost of $389,208 and $358,315, respectively) |
|
389,355 |
|
357,253 |
|
||
Investment securities held to maturity (fair value of $1,532 and $1,614, respectively) |
|
1,502 |
|
1,584 |
|
||
Other investments |
|
10,881 |
|
10,812 |
|
||
Total investments |
|
401,738 |
|
369,649 |
|
||
Loans and leases, net |
|
957,116 |
|
931,212 |
|
||
Goodwill |
|
35,068 |
|
34,095 |
|
||
Intangible assets |
|
3,463 |
|
3,601 |
|
||
Premises and equipment, net |
|
7,219 |
|
6,973 |
|
||
Accrued interest receivable |
|
4,161 |
|
4,120 |
|
||
Deferred income taxes |
|
3,436 |
|
3,738 |
|
||
Other |
|
16,775 |
|
15,830 |
|
||
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
$ |
1,463,382 |
|
$ |
1,403,877 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Demand |
|
$ |
312,949 |
|
$ |
304,324 |
|
NOW and money market |
|
349,781 |
|
348,518 |
|
||
Savings |
|
9,299 |
|
8,804 |
|
||
Certificates of deposit |
|
295,739 |
|
297,532 |
|
||
Total deposits |
|
967,768 |
|
959,178 |
|
||
Federal funds purchased |
|
31,000 |
|
2,300 |
|
||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
193,390 |
|
186,410 |
|
||
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank |
|
85,420 |
|
94,548 |
|
||
Accrued interest and other liabilities |
|
35,496 |
|
25,207 |
|
||
Junior subordinated debentures |
|
40,963 |
|
40,570 |
|
||
Total liabilities |
|
1,354,037 |
|
1,308,213 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Shareholders' equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cumulative preferred, $.01 par value; 2,000,000 shares authorized; None outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Common, $.01 par value; 25,000,000 shares authorized; 14,452,372 and 13,828,216 issued and outstanding, respectively |
|
145 |
|
138 |
|
||
Additional paid-in capital |
|
63,501 |
|
53,264 |
|
||
Retained earnings |
|
45,608 |
|
42,919 |
|
||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) net of income tax of $56 and $(405), respectively |
|
91 |
|
(657 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total shareholders' equity |
|
109,345 |
|
95,664 |
|
||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY |
|
$ |
1,463,382 |
|
$ |
1,403,877 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
2
CoBiz Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income
(unaudited)
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
||||
INTEREST INCOME: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Interest and fees on loans and leases |
|
$ |
14,038 |
|
$ |
12,742 |
|
Interest and dividends on investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Taxable securities |
|
2,836 |
|
2,824 |
|
||
Nontaxable securities |
|
44 |
|
71 |
|
||
Dividends on securities |
|
80 |
|
67 |
|
||
Federal funds sold and other |
|
23 |
|
4 |
|
||
Total interest income |
|
17,021 |
|
15,708 |
|
||
INTEREST EXPENSE: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Interest on deposits |
|
2,111 |
|
2,922 |
|
||
Interest on short-term borrowings and FHLB advances |
|
970 |
|
553 |
|
||
Interest on junior subordinated debentures |
|
502 |
|
309 |
|
||
Total interest expense |
|
3,583 |
|
3,784 |
|
||
NET INTEREST INCOME BEFORE PROVISION FOR LOAN AND LEASE LOSSES |
|
13,438 |
|
11,924 |
|
||
Provision for loan and lease losses |
|
405 |
|
418 |
|
||
NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION FOR LOAN AND LEASE LOSSES |
|
13,033 |
|
11,506 |
|
||
NONINTEREST INCOME: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Service charges |
|
716 |
|
611 |
|
||
Trust and advisory fees |
|
879 |
|
198 |
|
||
Insurance revenue |
|
1,929 |
|
516 |
|
||
Investment banking revenues |
|
533 |
|
182 |
|
||
Other income |
|
685 |
|
398 |
|
||
Total noninterest income |
|
4,742 |
|
1,905 |
|
||
NONINTEREST EXPENSE: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Salaries and employee benefits |
|
7,570 |
|
5,743 |
|
||
Occupancy expenses, premises and equipment |
|
2,259 |
|
1,739 |
|
||
Depreciation on leases |
|
1 |
|
43 |
|
||
Amortization of intangibles |
|
138 |
|
46 |
|
||
Other |
|
2,058 |
|
1,687 |
|
||
Total noninterest expense |
|
12,026 |
|
9,258 |
|
||
MINORITY INTERESTS |
|
- |
|
(3 |
) |
||
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES |
|
5,749 |
|
4,156 |
|
||
Provision for income taxes |
|
2,194 |
|
1,501 |
|
||
NET INCOME |
|
$ |
3,555 |
|
$ |
2,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
UNREALIZED APPRECIATION (DEPRECIATION) ON INVESTMENT SECURITIES AVAILABLE FOR SALE, net of tax |
|
748 |
|
(374 |
) |
||
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME |
|
$ |
4,303 |
|
$ |
2,281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
EARNINGS PER SHARE: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Basic |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
CoBiz Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2004 and 2003
(unaudited)
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net income |
|
$ |
3,555 |
|
$ |
2,655 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net amortization of securities |
|
501 |
|
136 |
|
||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
869 |
|
732 |
|
||
Provision for loan and lease losses |
|
405 |
|
418 |
|
||
Deferred income taxes |
|
(159 |
) |
232 |
|
||
Minority interests |
|
- |
|
(3 |
) |
||
Gain on sale of premises/equipment and securities |
|
(268 |
) |
(65 |
) |
||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Accrued interest receivable |
|
(41 |
) |
(139 |
) |
||
Other assets |
|
(1,011 |
) |
(402 |
) |
||
Accrued interest and other liabilities |
|
(103 |
) |
(378 |
) |
||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
3,748 |
|
3,186 |
|
||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Purchase of other investments |
|
(69 |
) |
(20 |
) |
||
Purchase of investment securities available for sale |
|
(60,453 |
) |
(39,143 |
) |
||
Maturities of investment securities held to maturity |
|
81 |
|
174 |
|
||
Maturities of investment securities available for sale |
|
58,030 |
|
22,229 |
|
||
Net cash paid in FDL earn-out |
|
(9,449 |
) |
- |
|
||
Loan and lease originations and repayments, net |
|
(26,309 |
) |
(18,815 |
) |
||
Purchase of premises and equipment |
|
(937 |
) |
(925 |
) |
||
Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment |
|
34 |
|
529 |
|
||
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
(39,072 |
) |
(35,971 |
) |
||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net increase in demand, NOW, money market, and savings accounts |
|
10,383 |
|
35,467 |
|
||
Net (decrease) in certificates of deposit |
|
(1,793 |
) |
(3,714 |
) |
||
Net increase (decrease) in federal funds purchased |
|
28,700 |
|
(900 |
) |
||
Net increase in securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
6,980 |
|
13,322 |
|
||
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank |
|
114,000 |
|
190,000 |
|
||
Repayments of advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank |
|
(123,128 |
) |
(195,000 |
) |
||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
795 |
|
195 |
|
||
Dividends paid on common stock |
|
(866 |
) |
(668 |
) |
||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
35,071 |
|
38,702 |
|
||
NET (DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
(253 |
) |
5,917 |
|
||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD |
|
34,659 |
|
33,252 |
|
||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD |
|
$ |
34,406 |
|
$ |
39,169 |
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
CoBiz Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements
(unaudited)
1. Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements
The accompanying consolidated condensed financial statements are unaudited and include the accounts of CoBiz Inc. (Parent), and its wholly owned subsidiaries: CoBiz ACMG, Inc.; CoBiz Bank, N.A. (the Bank, previously named American Business Bank, N.A.); CoBiz Insurance, Inc.; the Banks equipment leasing subsidiary, Colorado Business Leasing, Inc. (Leasing); CoBiz GMB, Inc.; and Financial Designs Ltd. (FDL, previously named CoBiz Connect, Inc.), all collectively referred to as the Company or CoBiz, conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and prevailing practices within the banking industry. The Bank operates in its Colorado market areas under the name Colorado Business Bank (CBB) and in its Arizona market areas under the name Arizona Business Bank (ABB).
The Bank is a commercial banking institution with seven locations in the Denver metropolitan area, two locations in Boulder and one in Edwards, Colorado, and four in the Phoenix metropolitan area. CoBiz ACMG, Inc. provides investment management services to institutions and individuals through its wholly owned subsidiary Alexander Capital Management Group, LLC (ACMG). FDL provides wealth transfer, employee benefits consulting, insurance brokerage and related administrative support to employers. CoBiz Insurance, Inc. provides commercial and personal property and casualty insurance brokerage, as well as risk management consulting services to small and medium-sized businesses and individuals. CoBiz GMB, Inc., provides investment banking services to middle-market companies through its wholly owned subsidiary, Green Manning & Bunch, Ltd. (GMB).
All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. These financial statements and notes thereto should be read in conjunction with, and are qualified in their entirety by, our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The consolidated condensed financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and the instructions to Form 10-Q. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting only of normally recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2004, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year ending December 31, 2004. Certain reclassifications have been made to prior balances to conform to the current year presentation.
2. Acquisitions
On April 1, 2003, the Company acquired ACMG, an SEC-registered investment advisory firm based in Denver, Colorado. The acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting, and, accordingly, the results of ACMGs operations have been included in the consolidated financial statements since the date of purchase. The acquisition of ACMG was completed through a merger of ACMG into a wholly owned subsidiary that was formed in order to consummate the transaction and then a subsequent contribution of the assets and liabilities of the merged entity into a newly formed limited liability company called Alexander Capital Management Group, LLC.
5
The terms of the merger agreement provide for additional earn-out payments to the former shareholders of ACMG for each of the twelve months ending on March 31, 2004, 2005, and 2006. The earn-out payments are based on a multiple of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization, as defined in the merger agreement, and are payable 40% in cash and 60% in CoBiz common stock. For the twelve months ending March 31, 2004, the Company has accrued $815,000 for the earn-out payment owed to the former partners of ACMG, which was paid in the second quarter of 2004. The accrued earn-out payment increased both Goodwill and Accrued interest and other liabilities in the accompanying financial statements.
On April 14, 2003, the Company acquired FDL, a provider of wealth transfer and employee benefit services based in Denver, Colorado. The acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting, and accordingly, the results of FDLs operations have been included in the consolidated financial statements since the date of purchase. The acquisition of FDL was completed through a merger of FDL into CoBiz Connect, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of CoBiz that has provided employee benefits consulting services since 2000. The surviving corporation continues to use the FDL name.
The terms of the merger agreement provide for additional earn-out payments to the former shareholders of FDL for each of the calendar years 2003 through 2006. The earn-out payments are based on a multiple of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization, as defined in the merger agreement, and are payable 50% in cash and 50% in CoBiz common stock. During the first quarter of 2004, the Company paid $9.5 million in cash and issued 542,632 shares valued at $9.5 million of CoBiz common stock to the former shareholders of FDL for the 2003 earn-out payment that was previously recorded during the fourth quarter of 2003.
Future earn-out payments for both the ACMG and FDL transactions, if made, will also be treated as additional costs of the acquisitions and recorded as goodwill in accordance with EITF 95-8 Accounting for Contingent Consideration Paid to the Shareholders of an Acquired Enterprise in a Purchase Business Combination.
3. Earnings per Common Share
Income available to common shareholders and the weighted average shares outstanding used in the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share are as follows:
|
|
Three months ended |
|
||||
|
|
March 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
||||
Income available to common shareholders |
|
$ |
3,555 |
|
$ |
2,655 |
|
Income impact of assumed conversions: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Convertible CoBiz GMB, Inc. Class B shares |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
||
Income available to common shareholders plus assumed conversions |
|
$ |
3,555 |
|
$ |
2,652 |
|
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic earnings per share |
|
14,259,876 |
|
13,282,225 |
|
||
Effect of dilutive securities |
|
721,324 |
|
479,661 |
|
||
Weighted average shares outstanding - diluted earnings per share |
|
14,981,200 |
|
13,761,886 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
As of March 31, 2004 and 2003, 56,813 and 455,665 options, respectively, were excluded from the earnings per share computation solely because their effect was anti-dilutive.
Effective December 15, 2002, the Company adopted SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation-Transition and Disclosure, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 123. SFAS No. 148 amends SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, to provide alternative methods of transition for an entity that voluntarily changes to the fair-value-based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. It also amends the disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 123 to require prominent disclosure about the effects on reported net income of an entitys accounting policy decisions with respect to stock-based employee compensation. Finally, it amends APB Opinion No. 28, Interim Financial Reporting, to require disclosure about those effects in interim financial information.
If the fair value based method of accounting under SFAS No. 123 had been applied, the Companys net income available for common shareholders and earnings per common share would have been reduced to the pro forma amounts indicated below (assuming that the fair value of options granted during the year is amortized over the vesting period):
|
|
Three months ended |
|
||||
|
|
March 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
||||
Net income, as reported |
|
$ |
3,555 |
|
$ |
2,655 |
|
Less: stock-based compensation determined under the fair value method |
|
(138 |
) |
(208 |
) |
||
Pro forma net income |
|
$ |
3,417 |
|
$ |
2,447 |
|
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
As reported - basic |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
As reported - diluted |
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
Pro forma - basic |
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
Pro forma - diluted |
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
7
4. Stock Dividend
On April 13, 2004, the Board of Directors approved a three-for-two stock split that was effected through a stock dividend for shareholders of record as of April 26, 2004, payable May 3, 2004. As a result of the dividend, 7,233,168 additional shares of CoBiz common stock were issued, with fractional shares paid in cash. Shares of CoBiz common stock began trading on a post-dividend basis on May 4, 2004. The proforma effects of the stock dividend on earnings per share and weighted-average shares used in the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share are as follows:
|
|
Three months ended |
|
||||
|
|
March 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
||||
Income available to common shareholders |
|
$ |
3,555 |
|
$ |
2,655 |
|
Income impact of assumed conversions: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Convertible CoBiz GMB, Inc. Class B shares |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
||
Income available to common shareholders plus assumed conversions |
|
$ |
3,555 |
|
$ |
2,652 |
|
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic earnings per share |
|
21,389,814 |
|
19,923,337 |
|
||
Effect of dilutive securities - stock options |
|
1,081,986 |
|
719,492 |
|
||
Weighted average shares outstanding - diluted earnings per share |
|
22,471,800 |
|
20,642,829 |
|
||
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
As reported - basic |
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
As reported - diluted |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
5. Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income is the total of (1) net income plus (2) all other changes in net assets arising from non-owner sources, which are referred to as other comprehensive income. Presented below are the changes in other comprehensive income for the periods indicated.
|
|
Three months ended |
|
||||
|
|
March 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
||||
Other comprehensive (loss) income, before tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Unrealized gain (loss) on available for sale securities arising during the period |
|
$ |
1,469 |
|
$ |
(604 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Reclassification adjustment for gains arising during the period |
|
(260 |
) |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Tax benefit (expense) related to items of other comprehensive income |
|
(461 |
) |
230 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax |
|
$ |
748 |
|
$ |
(374 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. Goodwill and Intangible Assets
The Company adopted SFAS No. 142 in January 2002, which requires companies to stop amortizing goodwill and certain intangible assets. Instead, SFAS No. 142 requires that goodwill and intangible assets with an indefinite life be reviewed for impairment upon adoption (January 1, 2002) and annually thereafter.
Under SFAS No. 142, goodwill impairment is deemed to exist when the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value. The Companys reporting units are generally consistent with the operating segments identified in Note 8. The Company estimates the fair value of the reporting units using multiples of comparable entities, including recent transactions, or a combination of multiples and a discounted cash flow analysis. As of the most recent annual evaluation, the estimated fair value of all reporting units exceeded their carrying values and goodwill impairment was not deemed to exist.
A summary of goodwill, adjustments to goodwill and total assets by operating segment as of March 31, 2004, is noted below. Refer to Note 2 for a discussion of adjustments to goodwill for the quarter ending March 31, 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
||||
|
|
Goodwill |
|
Assets |
|
||||||||
|
|
December 31, |
|
Acquisitions and |
|
March 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2003 |
|
Adjustments |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||||
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Colorado Business Bank |
|
$ |
11,786 |
|
$ |
291 |
|
$ |
12,077 |
|
$ |
1,137,454 |
|
Arizona Business Bank |
|
1,486 |
|
49 |
|
1,535 |
|
295,436 |
|
||||
Investment banking services |
|
4,486 |
|
|
|
4,486 |
|
5,663 |
|
||||
Trust and advisory services |
|
1,895 |
|
530 |
|
2,425 |
|
4,789 |
|
||||
Insurance |
|
14,442 |
|
103 |
|
14,545 |
|
19,811 |
|
||||
Corporate support and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
229 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Total |
|
$ |
34,095 |
|
$ |
973 |
|
$ |
35,068 |
|
$ |
1,463,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2004 |
|
December 31, 2003 |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
Gross |
|
Amortization |
|
Net |
|
Gross |
|
Amortization |
|
Net |
|
||||||
Intangible assets subject to amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Customer list |
|
$ |
293 |
|
$ |
(177 |
) |
$ |
116 |
|
$ |
293 |
|
$ |
(158 |
) |
$ |
135 |
|
Lease premium |
|
216 |
|
(216 |
) |
|
|
216 |
|
(200 |
) |
16 |
|
||||||
Customer contracts and relationships |
|
3,709 |
|
(427 |
) |
3,282 |
|
3,709 |
|
(328 |
) |
3,381 |
|
||||||
Employment and non-solicitation agreements |
|
80 |
|
(15 |
) |
65 |
|
80 |
|
(11 |
) |
69 |
|
||||||
Total |
|
$ |
4,298 |
|
$ |
(835 |
) |
$ |
3,463 |
|
$ |
4,298 |
|
$ |
(697 |
) |
$ |
3,601 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company recorded amortization expense of $138,000 related to intangible assets during the three months ended March 31, 2004, compared to $46,000 in the same period of 2003. Amortization expense on intangible assets for each of the five succeeding years is estimated as follows (in thousands):
2005 |
|
$ |
458 |
|
2006 |
|
397 |
|
|
2007 |
|
396 |
|
|
2008 |
|
355 |
|
|
2009 |
|
321 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,927 |
|
|
|
|
|
9
7. Derivatives
In January 2003, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement with a notional amount of $20,000,000. The swap effectively converted the Companys fixed interest rate obligation under the 10% junior subordinated debentures to a variable interest rate obligation, decreasing the asset sensitivity of the Companys statement of condition by more closely matching our variable rate assets with variable rate liabilities. The swap has a notional amount equal to the outstanding principal amount of the related 10% junior subordinated debentures, together with the same payment dates, maturity date and call provisions as the related 10% junior subordinated debentures. Under the swap, the Company pays interest at a variable rate equal to a spread over 90-day LIBOR, adjusted quarterly, and the Company receives a fixed rate equal to the interest that the Company is obligated to pay on the related trust preferred securities. The interest rate swap is a derivative financial instrument and has been designated as a fair value hedge of the 10% junior subordinated debentures. Because the critical terms of the interest rate swap match the terms of the 10% junior subordinated debentures, the swap qualifies for short-cut method accounting treatment under SFAS No. 133. The fair market value of the swap totaling $276,000 at March 31, 2004, is included in Accrued Interest and Other Liabilities in the Consolidated Statement of Condition. The 10% junior subordinated debentures have been adjusted by a similar amount.
The Company offers an interest rate hedge program to our customers that includes derivative products such as swaps, caps, floors, and collars to assist our customers in managing their interest-rate risk profile. In order to eliminate the interest rate risk associated with offering these products, the Company enters into derivative contracts with third parties that are a perfect offset to the customer contracts. At March 31, 2004, the Company had a prime-based swap with a notional value of $1,138,000 outstanding under the hedge program that was fully offset by a contract with a third party.
8. Segments
Our principal areas of activity consist of commercial banking, investment banking, trust and advisory services, insurance, and corporate support and other. The Company distinguishes its commercial banking segments based on geographic markets served. Currently, our reportable commercial banking segments are CBB and ABB. CBB is a full-service business bank with ten Colorado locations, including seven in the Denver metropolitan area, two locations in Boulder and one in Edwards, just west of Vail. ABB is based in Phoenix, Arizona and has branch offices in Surprise, Tempe and Scottsdale, Arizona. The Company has also announced the hiring of three additional bank presidents who will be opening two additional bank branches in Arizona and one in Colorado during the latter part of 2004.
The investment banking segment consists of the operations of GMB, which provides middle-market companies with merger and acquisition advisory services, institutional private placements of debt and equity and other strategic financial advisory services.
The trust and advisory services segment consists of the operations of ACMG and CoBiz Private Asset Management (PAM). ACMG is an SEC-registered investment management firm that manages stock and bond portfolios for individuals and institutions. CoBiz Private Asset Management is a separate business division within the Bank that offers wealth management and investment advisory services, fiduciary (trust) services, and estate administration services.
The insurance segment includes the activities of FDL and CoBiz Insurance, Inc. FDL provides employee benefits consulting, wealth transfer planning and preservation for high-net-worth individuals and executive benefits and compensation planning. CoBiz Insurance, Inc. provides commercial and
10
personal property and casualty insurance brokerage, as well as risk management consulting services to small and medium-sized businesses and individuals.
Corporate support and other consists of activities that are not directly attributable to the other reportable segments. Included in this category are the activities of Leasing, centralized bank operations, the Companys treasury function (i.e., investment management and wholesale funding), and activities of Parent.
The financial information for each business segment reflects that information which is specifically identifiable or which is allocated based on an internal allocation method. The results of operations and selected financial information by operating segment are as follows:
|
|
Colorado Business Bank |
|
Arizona Business Bank |
|
Investment Banking Services |
|
Trust and Advisory Services |
|
Insurance |
|
Corporate Support and Other |
|
Consolidated |
|
||||||||
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2004 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Income statement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Total interest income |
|
$ |
13,475 |
|
$ |
3,514 |
|
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
7 |
|
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
23 |
|
$ |
17,021 |
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
2,387 |
|
700 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
493 |
|
3,583 |
|
||||||||
Net interest income |
|
11,088 |
|
2,814 |
|
1 |
|
4 |
|
1 |
|
(470 |
) |
13,438 |
|
||||||||
Provision for loan and lease losses |
|
271 |
|
134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
405 |
|
||||||||
Net interest income after provision for loan and lease losses |
|
10,817 |
|
2,680 |
|
1 |
|
4 |
|
1 |
|
(470 |
) |
13,033 |
|
||||||||
Noninterest income |
|
1,061 |
|
327 |
|
534 |
|
880 |
|
1,932 |
|
8 |
|
4,742 |
|
||||||||
Noninterest expense and minority interest |
|
3,559 |
|
1,632 |
|
683 |
|
753 |
|
1,670 |
|
3,729 |
|
12,026 |
|
||||||||
Income before income taxes |
|
8,319 |
|
1,375 |
|
(148 |
) |
131 |
|
263 |
|
(4,191 |
) |
5,749 |
|
||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
|
3,110 |
|
526 |
|
(56 |
) |
53 |
|
133 |
|
(1,572 |
) |
2,194 |
|
||||||||
Net income before management fees and overhead allocations |
|
$ |
5,209 |
|
$ |
849 |
|
$ |
(92 |
) |
$ |
78 |
|
$ |
130 |
|
$ |
(2,619 |
) |
$ |
3,555 |
|
|
Management fees and overhead allocations, net of tax |
|
1,547 |
|
389 |
|
27 |
|
21 |
|
47 |
|
(2,031 |
) |
|
|
||||||||
Net income |
|
$ |
3,662 |
|
$ |
460 |
|
$ |
(119 |
) |
$ |
57 |
|
$ |
83 |
|
$ |
(588 |
) |
$ |
3,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Balance sheet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,137,454 |
|
$ |
295,436 |
|
$ |
5,663 |
|
$ |
4,789 |
|
$ |
19,811 |
|
$ |
229 |
|
$ |
1,463,382 |
|
|
Total gross loans and leases |
|
755,242 |
|
213,525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,009 |
|
969,776 |
|
||||||||
Total deposits and customer repurchase agreements |
|
885,105 |
|
200,735 |
|
|
|
1,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,087,122 |
|
||||||||
|
|
Colorado Business Bank |
|
Arizona Business Bank |
|
Investment Banking Services |
|
Trust and Advisory Services |
|
Insurance |
|
Corporate Support and Other |
|
Consolidated |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2003 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Income statement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total interest income |
|
$ |
12,111 |
|
$ |
3,016 |
|
$ |
2 |
|
$ |
4 |
|
$ |
2 |
|
$ |
573 |
|
$ |
15,708 |
|
Total interest expense |
|
2,163 |
|
687 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
934 |
|
3,784 |
|
|||||||
Net interest income |
|
9,948 |
|
2,329 |
|
2 |
|
4 |
|
2 |
|
(361 |
) |
11,924 |
|
|||||||
Provision for loan and lease losses |
|
243 |
|
175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
418 |
|
|||||||
Net interest income after provision for loan and lease losses |
|
9,705 |
|
2,154 |
|
2 |
|
4 |
|
2 |
|
(361 |
) |
11,506 |
|
|||||||
Noninterest income |
|
717 |
|
138 |
|
186 |
|
198 |
|
522 |
|
144 |
|
1,905 |
|
|||||||
Noninterest expense |
|
2,650 |
|
1,204 |
|
830 |
|
210 |
|
401 |
|
3,960 |
|
9,255 |
|
|||||||
Income before income taxes |
|
7,772 |
|
1,088 |
|
(642 |
) |
(8 |
) |
123 |
|
(4,177 |
) |
4,156 |
|
|||||||
Provision for income taxes |
|
2,900 |
|
413 |
|
(243 |
) |
(3 |
) |
47 |
|
(1,613 |
) |
1,501 |
|
|||||||
Net income before management fees and overhead allocations |
|
$ |
4,872 |
|
$ |
675 |
|
$ |
(399 |
) |
$ |
(5 |
) |
$ |
76 |
|
$ |
(2,564 |
) |
$ |
2,655 |
|
Management fees and overhead allocations, net of tax |
|
1,806 |
|
360 |
|
16 |
|
26 |
|
33 |
|
(2,241 |
) |
|
|
|||||||
Net income |
|
$ |
3,066 |
|
$ |
315 |
|
$ |
(415 |
) |
$ |
(31 |
) |
$ |
43 |
|
$ |
(323 |
) |
$ |
2,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Balance sheet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total assets |
|
$ |
934,956 |
|
$ |
213,367 |
|
$ |
4,497 |
|
$ |
482 |
|
$ |
1,752 |
|
$ |
4,196 |
|
1,159,250 |
|
|
Total gross loans and leases |
|
657,422 |
|
155,892 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,355 |
|
817,669 |
|
|||||||
Total deposits and customer repurchase agreements |
|
838,098 |
|
178,989 |
|
|
|
470 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,017,557 |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
This discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in this Form 10-Q. For a description of our accounting policies, see Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003. For a discussion of the segments included in our principal activities, see Note 17 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.
Executive Summary
The Company is a financial holding company that offers a broad array of financial service products to its target market of small and medium-sized businesses and high-net-worth individuals. Our operating segments include our commercial banking franchise, Colorado Business Bank and Arizona Business Bank, Investment Banking Services, Trust and Advisory Services, and Insurance.
Earnings are derived primarily from our net interest income, which is interest income less interest expense, and our noninterest income earned from our fee-based business lines and banking service fees, offset by noninterest expense. We have focused on reducing our dependency on our net interest margin by increasing our noninterest income. Our fee-based business lines have continued to grow, with the additions of ACMG and FDL during 2003, which added investment management, high-end life insurance products, and wealth transfer planning to the array of financial services offered to our targeted customer base.
We believe that through the combination of our commercial banking franchise and our fee-based businesses, we are uniquely situated to service our commercial clients throughout their business lifecycle. We are able to help our customers grow by providing banking services from our bank franchise, capital planning from GMB, and employee and executive benefits packages from FDL. We can assist in planning for the future with estate planning and business succession from FDL and financial planning from PAM. We are able to protect assets with property and casualty insurance from CoBiz Insurance. We can facilitate exit and retirement strategies with M&A services from GMB and investment management services with ACMG. We are also able to preserve our customers wealth with trust and fiduciary services from PAM, investment management services from ACMG and wealth transfer services from FDL.
Our primary strategy is to differentiate ourselves from our competitors by providing our local presidents with substantial decision-making authority and expanding our products to meet the needs of small to medium-sized businesses and high-net-worth individuals. In all areas of our operations, we focus on attracting and retaining the highest quality personnel by maintaining an entrepreneurial culture and decentralized business approach. We believe that recent consolidations of several large institutions within the banking industry provides us with the opportunity to gain market share, as customers look for services from institutions based within their community that provide a broad base of services. In addition, in the two main geographic regions in which we operate, Colorado and Arizona, the markets are dominated by out-of-state banks. We believe this provides us with tremendous opportunity to grow organicly. During 2004, we also intend to grow through the addition of new de novo branches. We have hired three new bank presidents who will be opening two bank branches in Arizona and one in Colorado during the second half of 2004.
During the past few years, the trend of decreasing interest rates has negatively impacted most financial institutions, including the Company. However, with the expanding economy and risk of inflation during 2004, most bank economists believe that the Federal Reserve will increase interest rates during December of this year, with the earliest projection being June of this year and the latest
12
projection being June of 2005. If the Federal Reserve were to increase interest rates, this would be the first increase since May of 2000. An increase in interest rates would provide additional earnings to the Company, as 93% of our assets are interest-earning while only 69% of our liabilities are interest-bearing.
Critical Accounting Policies
The Companys discussion and analysis of its financial condition and results of operations are based upon the Companys consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses. In making those critical accounting estimates, we are required to make assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time of the estimate. Different estimates we could reasonably have used, or changes in the assumptions that are reasonably likely to occur, would have a material effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses
The allowance for loan and lease losses represents managements recognition of the risks of extending credit and its evaluation of the quality of the loan and lease portfolio. The allowance for loan and lease losses is a critical accounting policy that requires subjective estimates in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements. The allowance for loan and lease losses is evaluated on a regular basis by management and is based upon managements periodic review of the collectibilty of loans and leases in light of historical experience, the nature and volume of the loan and lease portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrowers ability to repay, estimated value of any underlying collateral, and prevailing economic conditions. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available.
We maintain a loan review program independent of the lending function that is designed to reduce and control risk in the lending function. It includes the monitoring of lending activities with respect to underwriting and processing new loans, preventing insider abuse, and timely follow-up and corrective action for loans showing signs of deterioration in quality. We also have a systematic process to evaluate individual loans and pools of loans within our loan and lease portfolio. We maintain a loan grading system whereby each loan is assigned a grade between 1 and 8, with 1 representing the highest quality credit, 7 representing a non-accrual loan, and 8 representing a loss that will be charged-off. Grades are assigned based upon the degree of risk associated with repayment of a loan in the normal course of business pursuant to the original terms. Loans above a certain dollar amount that are adversely graded are reported to the Loan Committee and the Chief Credit Officer along with current financial information, a collateral analysis and an action plan. Individual loans that are deemed to be impaired are evaluated in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 114 Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan.
In determining the appropriate level of the allowance for loan and lease losses, we model an analysis of the various components of the loan and lease portfolio, including all significant credits on an individual basis. When analyzing the adequacy, we segment the loan and lease portfolio into components with similar characteristics, such as risk classification, past due status, type of loan, industry, or collateral. Possible factors that may impact the allowance for loan and lease losses include, but are not limited to:
Changes in lending policies and procedures, including underwriting standards and collection, charge-off, and recovery practices.
13
Changes in national and local economic and business conditions, including the condition of various market segments.
Changes in the nature and volume of the portfolio.
Changes in the experience, ability, and depth of lending management and staff.
Changes in the trend of the volume and severity of past-due and classified loans, and trends in the volume of non-accrual loans, troubled debt restructurings, and other loan modifications.
Changes in the quality of the loan review system and the degree of oversight by the board of directors.
The existence and effect of any concentrations of credit, and changes in the level of such concentrations.
The effect of external factors such as competition and legal and regulatory requirements on the level of estimated credit losses in the current portfolio.
Refer to the Provision and Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses section under Results of Operations below for further discussion on managements methodology.
Recoverability of Goodwill
SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, requires that we evaluate on an annual basis (or whenever events occur which may indicate possible impairment) whether any portion of our recorded goodwill is impaired. The recoverability of goodwill is a critical accounting policy that requires subjective estimates in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements. Goodwill impairment is determined by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit to its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is not considered impaired. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than the carrying amount, goodwill is considered impaired. We estimate the fair value of our reporting units using market multiples of comparable entities, including recent transactions, or a combination of market multiples and a discounted cash flow methodology.
We conducted our annual evaluation of our reporting units, including our investment banking subsidiary, GMB, as of December 31, 2003. As discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003, the estimated fair value of all reporting units exceeded their carrying values, and goodwill impairment was not deemed to exist. Since the acquisition of GMB, merger and acquisition activity has decreased as a result of poor economic conditions. As such, the revenues of GMB have been less than their projected targets. Although we fully expect merger and acquisition activity to increase as the economy improves, if GMB continues to recognize operational losses our evaluation of the fair value of GMB could result in the determination that the carrying value of the business exceeds its fair value and that goodwill relating to GMB has been impaired. If we were to conclude that goodwill has been impaired, that conclusion could result in a non-cash goodwill impairment charge, which would adversely affect our results of operations.
We also have other policies that we consider to be key accounting policies; however, these policies, which are disclosed in Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, do not meet the definition of critical accounting policies because they do not generally require us to make estimates or judgments that are difficult or subjective.
14
Total assets increased by $59.5 million to $1.46 billion as of March 31, 2004, from $1.40 billion as of December 31, 2003. The increase in total assets is primarily due to growth in investments and net loans. Investments represent 27% of total assets at March 31, 2004 compared to 26% at December 31, 2003. The increase in total assets was largely funded by deposits, security repurchase agreements and federal funds purchased.
The following table sets forth the balance of loans and leases and deposits as of March 31, 2004, December 31, 2003, and March 31, 2003 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
March 31, 2004 |
|
December 31, 2003 |
|
March 31, 2003 |
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
% of |
|
|||
|
|
Amount |
|
Portfolio |
|
Amount |
|
Portfolio |
|
Amount |
|
Portfolio |
|
|||
Loans and Leases: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Commercial |
|
$ |
332,884 |
|
34.8 |
% |
$ |
308,174 |
|
33.1 |
% |
$ |
255,168 |
|
31.6 |
% |
Real estate mortgage |
|
457,415 |
|
47.8 |
% |
454,865 |
|
48.8 |
% |
371,781 |
|
46.1 |
% |
|||
Real estate construction |
|
110,386 |
|
11.5 |
% |
109,326 |
|
11.7 |
% |
126,486 |
|
15.7 |
% |
|||
Consumer |
|
58,386 |
|
6.1 |
% |
61,049 |
|
6.6 |
% |
52,019 |
|
6.4 |
% |
|||
Municipal leases |
|
9,696 |
|
1.0 |
% |
8,803 |
|
0.9 |
% |
7,860 |
|
1.0 |
% |
|||
Small business leases |
|
1,009 |
|
0.1 |
% |
1,398 |
|
0.2 |
% |
4,355 |
|
0.5 |
% |
|||
Loans and leases |
|
$ |
969,776 |
|
101.3 |
% |
$ |
943,615 |
|
101.3 |
% |
$ |
817,669 |
|
101.3 |
% |
Less allowance for loan and lease losses |
|
(12,660 |
) |
(1.3% |
) |
(12,403 |
) |
(1.3% |
) |
(10,786 |
) |
(1.3% |
) |
|||
Net loans and leases |
|
$ |
957,116 |
|
100.0 |
% |
$ |
931,212 |
|
100.0 |
% |
$ |
806,883 |
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Deposits and Customer Repurchase Agreements: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
NOW and money market accounts |
|
$ |
349,781 |
|
32.1 |
% |
$ |
348,518 |
|
31.5 |
% |
$ |
292,739 |
|
28.8 |
% |
Savings |
|
9,299 |
|
0.9 |
% |
8,804 |
|
0.8 |
% |
8,291 |
|
0.8 |
% |
|||
Certificates of deposit under $100,000 |
|
80,231 |
|
7.4 |
% |
89,367 |
|
8.1 |
% |
136,260 |
|
13.4 |
% |
|||
Certificates of deposit $100,000 and over |
|
215,507 |
|
19.8 |
% |
208,165 |
|
18.9 |
% |
191,099 |
|
18.8 |
% |
|||
Total interest-bearing deposits |
|
$ |
654,818 |
|
60.3 |
% |
$ |
654,854 |
|
59.4 |
% |
$ |
628,389 |
|
61.8 |
% |
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits |
|
312,949 |
|
28.8 |
% |
304,324 |
|
27.6 |
% |
260,329 |
|
25.6 |
% |
|||
Customer repurchase agreements |
|
119,355 |
|
11.0 |
% |
144,653 |
|
13.1 |
% |
128,839 |
|
12.6 |
% |
|||
Total deposits and customer repurchase agreements |
|
$ |
1,087,122 |
|
100.0 |
% |
$ |
1,103,831 |
|
100.0 |
% |
$ |
1,017,557 |
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross loans and leases increased by $26.2 million as of March 31, 2004, from $943.6 million as of December 31, 2003. The increase in loans and leases is primarily due to growth in our commercial and real estate portfolios. For the quarter ending March 31, 2004, loans and leases have grown at an annualized rate of 11%. All of the growth during this quarter came for the Colorado market, as the Arizona market realized a slight decrease in its loan and lease portfolio due to the payoff of several large transactional-based real estate credits booked prior to the acquisition of First Capital Bank of Arizona.
Deposits increased by $8.6 million to $967.8 million as of March 31, 2004, from $959.2 million as of December 31, 2003. The increase in deposits was primarily from growth in non-interest bearing deposits, which represented 32% of total deposits at both March 31, 2004, and December 31, 2003. Securities sold under agreements to repurchase were $193.4 million at March 31, 2004, and $186.4 million at December 31, 2003. Securities sold under agreement to repurchase are represented by two types, customer repurchase agreements and street repurchase agreements. Management does not consider customer repurchase agreements to be a wholesale funding source, but rather an additional treasury management service provided to our customer base. Of the total repurchase agreements outstanding at March 31, 2004, and December 31, 2003, 62% and 78%, respectively, represent repurchase agreements transacted on behalf of our customers. Our customer repurchase agreements are based on an overnight investment sweep that can fluctuate based on our customers operating account balances.
15
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Topeka (FHLB) were $85.4 million at March 31, 2004, compared to $94.5 million at December 31, 2003. Advances from the FHLB are used as part of our liquidity management strategy and can fluctuate based on the Companys cash position.
Results of Operations
The following table presents the condensed statements of income for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003.
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|||||||||
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) |
|
|||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
Amount |
|
% |
|
|||
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|||||||||
Interest income |
|
$ |
17,021 |
|
$ |
15,708 |
|
$ |
1,313 |
|
8 |
% |
Interest expense |
|
3,583 |
|
3,784 |
|
(201 |
) |
(5% |
) |
|||
Net interest income before provision for loan and lease losses |
|
13,438 |
|
11,924 |
|
1,514 |
|
13 |
% |
|||
Provision for loan and lease losses |
|
405 |
|
418 |
|
(13 |
) |
(3% |
) |
|||
Net interest income after provision for loan and lease losses |
|
13,033 |
|
11,506 |
|
1,527 |
|
13 |
% |
|||
Noninterest income |
|
4,742 |
|
1,905 |
|
2,837 |
|
149 |
% |
|||
Noninterest expense and minority interests |
|
12,026 |
|
9,255 |
|
2,771 |
|
30 |
% |
|||
Income before income taxes |
|
5,749 |
|
4,156 |
|
1,593 |
|
38 |
% |
|||
Provision for income taxes |
|
2,194 |
|
1,501 |
|
693 |
|
46 |
% |
|||
Net income |
|
$ |
3,555 |
|
$ |
2,655 |
|
$ |
900 |
|
34 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income was $3.6 million for the three months ending March 31, 2004, and $2.7 million for the three months ending March 31, 2003. Earnings per share on a fully diluted basis for the first quarter were $0.24 for 2004 and $0.19 for 2003. Annualized return on average assets for the three months ended March 31, 2004, was 1.02%, versus 0.95% for the three months ended March 31, 2003. Annualized return on average common shareholders equity for the three months ended March 31, 2004, was 14.17% versus 12.99% for the three months ended March 31, 2003.
Net Interest Income
The largest component of our net income is our net interest income. Net interest income is the difference between interest income, principally from loans, leases and investment securities, and interest expense, principally on customer deposits and borrowings. Changes in net interest income result from changes in volume, net interest spread and net interest margin. Volume refers to the average dollar levels of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest spread refers to the difference between the average yield on interest-earning assets and the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest margin refers to net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets and is influenced by the level and relative mix of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities.
As the majority of our assets are interest-earning and our liabilities are interest-bearing, changes in interest rates impact our net interest margin. We currently maintain an asset-sensitive balance sheet and our net interest margin will be positively impacted if interest rates increase. Conversely, a decrease in interest rates would negatively impact our net interest margin. We manage our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities to reduce the impact of interest rate changes on our operating results.
16
Total interest income on a tax equivalent basis increased 8% to $17.1 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as compared to March 31, 2003. This increase was driven by $144.4 million in growth of our average loan portfolio, offset by a 47-basis-point decrease in our loan yields in the first quarter of 2004 as compared to the same period in 2003. The increase in investment income from the growth in our investment portfolio was mostly offset by lower yields in the first quarter of 2004 compared to the same period in 2003.
Total interest expense during the first quarter of 2004 decreased $201,000 to $3.6 million compared to $3.8 million for the same period a year ago. The cost of funds on the $183.8 million increase in our average interest-earning liabilities was fully offset by a 44-basis-point decrease in yields on those liabilities.
Net interest income before provision for loan and lease losses, on a tax equivalent basis, was $13.5 million, a $1.5 million, or a 13% increase from the same period a year ago. Yields earned on our interest-earning assets decreased by 67 basis points to 5.17% for the three months ended March 31, 2004, as compared to the same period a year ago. Interest paid on interest-bearing liabilities decreased by 44 basis points for the three months ended March 31, 2004, as compared to the same period a year ago. The net interest margin was 4.15% for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, down from 4.50% for the quarter ended March 31, 2003. The Bank maintains an asset-sensitive interest rate profile, and was negatively impacted by the 25-basis-point decrease in the prime rate that occurred at the end of the second quarter of 2003. The 25-basis-point decrease in the prime rate did not impact the first quarter of 2003, but has fully impacted subsequent quarters, including the first quarter of 2004.
The following tables set forth the average amounts outstanding for each category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, the interest earned or paid on such amounts, and the average rate earned or paid for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003.
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
For the three months ended March 31, |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
Average balance |
|
Interest earned or paid |
|
Average yield or cost (1) |
|
Average balance |
|
Interest earned or paid |
|
Average yield or cost (1) |
|
|
|||||
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
||||||||||||||||
ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Federal funds sold and other |
|
$ |
1,529 |
|
$ |
23 |
|
5.95 |
% |
$ |
824 |
|
$ |
4 |
|
1.94 |
% |
|
|
Investment securities (2) |
|
365,159 |
|
2,984 |
|
3.23 |
% |
281,762 |
|
3,000 |
|
4.26 |
% |
|
|||||
Loans and leases (3) |
|
953,587 |
|
14,070 |
|
5.84 |
% |
809,182 |
|
12,773 |
|
6.31 |
% |
|
|||||
Allowance for loan and lease losses |
|
(12,516 |
) |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
(10,547 |
) |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|||||
Total interest-earning assets |
|
1,307,759 |
|
17,076 |
|
5.17 |
% |
1,081,221 |
|
15,776 |
|
5.84 |
% |
|
|||||
Noninterest-earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash and due from banks |
|
32,923 |
|
|
|
|
|
31,599 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Other |
|
66,908 |
|
|
|
|
|
23,666 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,407,590 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,136,486 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
NOW and money market accounts |
|
$ |
350,553 |
|
$ |
598 |
|
0.69 |
% |
$ |
294,835 |
|
$ |
652 |
|
0.90 |
% |
|
|
Savings |
|
8,940 |
|
7 |
|
0.31 |
% |
7,534 |
|
11 |
|
0.59 |
% |
|
|||||
Certificates of deposit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Under $100,000 |
|
87,155 |
|
499 |
|
2.30 |
% |
137,857 |
|
1,023 |
|
3.01 |
% |
|
|||||
$100,000 and over |
|
210,606 |
|
1,007 |
|
1.92 |
% |
190,330 |
|
1,236 |
|
2.63 |
% |
|
|||||
Total interest-bearing deposits |
|
657,254 |
|
2,111 |
|
1.29 |
% |
630,556 |
|
2,922 |
|
1.88 |
% |
|
|||||
Other borrowings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Securities and loans sold under agreements to repurchase and federal funds purchased |
|
227,360 |
|
694 |
|
1.21 |
% |
132,217 |
|
345 |
|
1.04 |
% |
|
|||||
FHLB advances |
|
81,283 |
|
276 |
|
1.34 |
% |
39,893 |
|
208 |
|
2.09 |
% |
|
|||||
Junior subordinated debentures |
|
40,575 |
|
502 |
|
4.89 |
% |
19,999 |
|
309 |
|
6.11 |
% |
|
|||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
1,006,472 |
|
3,583 |
|
1.42 |
% |
822,665 |
|
3,784 |
|
1.86 |
% |
|
|||||
Noninterest-bearing demand accounts |
|
283,582 |
|
|
|
|
|
227,207 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total deposits and interest-bearing liabilities |
|
1,290,054 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,049,872 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Other noninterest-bearing liabilities |
|
16,666 |
|
|
|
|
|
3,742 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total liabilities and preferred securities |
|
1,306,720 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,053,614 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Shareholders equity |
|
100,870 |
|
|
|
|
|
82,872 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
1,407,590 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,136,486 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Net interest income |
|
|
|
$ |
13,493 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
11,992 |
|
|
|
|
|||
Net interest spread |
|
|
|
|
|
3.74 |
% |
|
|
|
|
3.98 |
% |
|
|||||
Net interest margin |
|
|
|
|
|
4.15 |
% |
|
|
|
|
4.50 |
% |
|
|||||
Ratio of average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities |
|
129.93 |
% |
|
|
|
|
131.43 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
(1) Average yield or cost for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003 has been annualized and is not necessarily indicative of results for the entire year.
(2) Yields include adjustments for tax-exempt interest income.
(3) Loan fees included in interest income are not material. Nonaccrual loans and leases are included in average loans and leases outstanding.
18
Noninterest Income
The following table presents noninterest income for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003 (in thousands).
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) |
|
|||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
Amount |
|
% |
|
|||
Noninterest income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Deposit service charges |
|
$ |
716 |
|
$ |
611 |
|
$ |
105 |
|
17 |
% |
Other loan fees |
|
153 |
|
159 |
|
(6 |
) |
(4% |
) |
|||
Trust and advisory income |
|
879 |
|
198 |
|
681 |
|
344 |
% |
|||
Insurance revenue |
|
1,929 |
|
516 |
|
1,413 |
|
274 |
% |
|||
Investment banking revenue |
|
533 |
|
182 |
|
351 |
|
193 |
% |
|||
Other income |
|
264 |
|
174 |
|
90 |
|
51 |
% |
|||
Gain on sale of other assets and securities |
|
268 |
|
65 |
|
203 |
|
311 |
% |
|||
Total noninterest income |
|
$ |
4,742 |
|
$ |
1,905 |
|
$ |
2,837 |
|
149 |
% |
Noninterest income includes revenues earned from sources other than interest income. These sources include: service charges and fees on deposit accounts, letter of credit and ancillary loan fees, income from trust and investment advisory services, income from life insurance and wealth transfer products, benefits brokerage, property and casualty insurance, retainer and success fees from investment banking engagements, increases in the cash surrender value of bank-owned life insurance policies, and net gains on sales of investment securities and other assets. Noninterest income for the first quarter of 2004 was $4.7 million, compared to noninterest income of $1.9 million for the first quarter of 2003, a 149% increase.
The increase in deposit service charges is primarily due to an increase in the number of treasury management customers. We have continued to focus on introducing new customers to our treasury management products as well as adding additional treasury management products to customers currently using our services, which has added to our deposit service charge income.
The increase in trust and advisory income was primarily attributable to the acquisition of ACMG, which generated $628,000 in investment advisory fees for the first quarter of 2004. ACMGs revenues are dependent upon the market value of their assets under management. As of March 31, 2004, ACMG and PAM had a combined $459.4 million in discretionary assets under management and $73.8 million in non-discretionary assets under management.
The increase in insurance revenue was driven by the acquisition of FDL, which generated $1.3 million in revenue during the first quarter of 2004. The addition of FDL significantly expanded our benefits brokerage services, while adding life insurance and wealth transfer planning to our insurance products. During the first quarter of 2004, revenue earned from the insurance segment is comprised 40% of wealth transfer, 29% benefits brokerage, 28% property and casualty, and 3% of miscellaneous fees. During the same period in 2003, insurance revenue was comprised of 74% property and casualty, 25% benefits brokerage, and 1% of miscellaneous fees.
Investment banking income includes non-refundable retainer fees which are recognized over the expected term of the engagement and success fees which are recognized when the transaction is completed and collectibility of fees is reasonably assured. Investment banking revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2004, included a success fee from one engagement that represents 69% of the total revenue earned for the first quarter. No success fees were earned in the same period of 2003.
19
Other income is comprised of increases in the cash surrender value of life insurance, merchant charges, bankcard fees, wire transfer fees, foreign exchange fees, and safe deposit income. The increase in other income is primarily due to the purchase of bank-owned life insurance in the latter part of 2003, which added $111,000 in the first quarter of 2004 compared to the same period in 2003. As of March 31, 2004, the cash surrender value of the Companys bank-owned life insurance was $11.0 million.
During the first quarter of 2004, we rebalanced our investment portfolio by selling certain securities and purchasing other securities. The increase in gains on sales of other assets and securities is primarily due to the $35.4 million sale of available-for-sale mortgage-backed securities for a gain of $260,000.
We believe offering such complementary products as discussed above allows us to both broaden our relationships with existing customers and attract new customers to our core business. We believe the fees generated by these services will increase our noninterest income and eventually reduce our dependency on net interest income. Noninterest income as a percentage of operating revenues was 26% for the three months ended March 31, 2004, compared to 14% for the same period in 2003.
Noninterest Expense
The following table presents noninterest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003 (in thousands).
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) |
|
|||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
Amount |
|
% |
|
|||
Noninterest expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Salaries and employee benefits |
|
$ |
7,570 |
|
$ |
5,743 |
|
$ |
1,827 |
|
32 |
% |
Occupancy expenses, premises and equipment |
|
2,259 |
|
1,739 |
|
520 |
|
30 |
% |
|||
Depreciation on leases |
|
1 |
|
43 |
|
(42 |
) |
(98% |
) |
|||
Amortization of intangibles |
|
138 |
|
46 |
|
92 |
|
200 |
% |
|||
Other operating expenses |
|
2,058 |
|
1,687 |
|
371 |
|
22 |
% |
|||
Total other expense |
|
$ |
12,026 |
|
$ |
9,258 |
|
$ |
2,768 |
|
30 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in salaries and employee benefits in 2004 from 2003 was due primarily to the additional staff from the acquisitions of FDL and ACMG. The hiring of additional personnel required to accommodate the Companys growth, as well as cost of living and performance raises awarded to employees effective January 1, 2004, has also contributed to the increase. The Companys full time equivalent employees were 399 and 289 at March 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
Occupancy costs have increased due to the aforementioned acquisitions and the additions of the Scottsdale branch in March of 2003 and the Northeast branch in November of 2003. An ongoing commitment to providing the highest level of technological service to our customers has also increased our depreciation and maintenance expense.
The decrease in depreciation on operating leases was a result of dedicating fewer resources to originating leases and it is expected that depreciation will continue to decrease.
The increase in amortization of intangibles is primarily a result of the acquisitions of FDL and ACMG. As part of these acquisitions, intangible assets subject to amortization for customer contracts and relationships, and employment and non-solicitation agreements were recognized.
20
Other operating expenses have increased primarily in the areas of marketing and operational losses. The increase in marketing is a direct result of our growth initiatives as we attempt to increase our loan and deposit bases and generate additional noninterest income from our fee-based businesses. The increase in operational losses is related to a branch bank robbery from which we took a loss equal to our insurance deductible.
Overall, the increases in noninterest expenses reflect our ongoing investment in personnel, technology and office space needed to accommodate internal growth and the expansion of our business through acquisitions and the opening of new branches.
Provision and Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses
The provision for loan and lease losses was $0.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003. Key indicators of asset quality have remained favorable, while average outstanding loan amounts have increased to $953.6 million for the first three months of 2004, up from $809.2 million for the same period in 2003. As of March 31, 2004, the allowance for loan and lease losses amounted to $12.7 million, or 1.31% of total loans and leases, compared to 1.32% at March 31, 2003.
The following table presents, for the periods indicated, an analysis of the allowance for loan and lease losses and other related data.
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Year ended |
|
Three months ended |
|
|||
|
|
March 31, 2004 |
|
December 31, 2003 |
|
March 31, 2003 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|||
Balance of allowance for loan and lease losses at beginning of period |
|
$ |
12,403 |
|
$ |
10,388 |
|
$ |
10,388 |
|
Charge-offs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Commercial |
|
(117 |
) |
(323 |
) |
(39 |
) |
|||
Real estate mortgage |
|
(14 |
) |
(204 |
) |
(2 |
) |
|||
Consumer |
|
(37 |
) |
(60 |
) |
(2 |
) |
|||
Direct financing leases |
|
(15 |
) |
(339 |
) |
(19 |
) |
|||
Total charge-offs |
|
(183 |
) |
(926 |
) |
(62 |
) |
|||
Recoveries: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Commercial |
|
16 |
|
37 |
|
4 |
|
|||
Consumer |
|
12 |
|
41 |
|
21 |
|
|||
Direct financing leases |
|
7 |
|
103 |
|
17 |
|
|||
Total recoveries |
|
35 |
|
181 |
|
42 |
|
|||
Net charge-offs |
|
(148 |
) |
(745 |
) |
(20 |
) |
|||
Provisions for loan and lease losses charged to operations |
|
405 |
|
2,760 |
|
418 |
|
|||
Balance of allowance for loan and lease losses at end of period |
|
$ |
12,660 |
|
$ |
12,403 |
|
$ |
10,786 |
|
Ratio of net charge-offs to average loans and leases (1) |
|
(0.06 |
)% |
(0.09 |
)% |
(0.01 |
)% |
|||
Average loans and leases outstanding during the period |
|
$ |
953,587 |
|
$ |
855,085 |
|
$ |
809,182 |
|
(1) The ratios for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003 have been annualized. The March 31, 2004, ratio is not necessarily indicative of the results for the entire year.
Nonperforming Assets
Nonperforming assets consist of nonaccrual loans and leases, restructured loans and leases, past due loans and leases, repossessed assets, and other real estate owned. Nonperforming assets were $2.0
21
million as of March 31, 2004, compared with $1.6 million as of December 31, 2003 and $3.1 million as of March 31, 2003. The following table presents information regarding nonperforming assets as of the dates indicated:
|
|
At March 31, |
|
At December 31, |
|
At March 31, |
|
|||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2003 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|||
Nonperforming loans and leases: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Loans and leases 90 days or more delinquent and still accruing interest |
|
$ |
386 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
227 |
|
Nonaccrual loans and leases |
|
1,364 |
|
1,519 |
|
2,824 |
|
|||
Total nonperforming loans and leases |
|
1,750 |
|
1,519 |
|
3,051 |
|
|||
Repossessed assets |
|
233 |
|
60 |
|
|
|
|||
Real estate acquired by foreclosure |
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Total nonperforming assets |
|
$ |
2,043 |
|
$ |
1,579 |
|
$ |
3,051 |
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses |
|
$ |
12,660 |
|
$ |
12,403 |
|
$ |
10,786 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Ratio of nonperforming assets to total assets |
|
0.14 |
% |
0.11 |
% |
0.26 |
% |
|||
Ratio of nonperforming loans and leases to total loans and leases |
|
0.18 |
% |
0.16 |
% |
0.37 |
% |
|||
Ratio of allowance for loan and lease losses to total loans and leases |
|
1.31 |
% |
1.32 |
% |
1.32 |
% |
|||
Ratio of allowance for loan and lease losses to to nonperforming loans and leases |
|
723.43 |
% |
816.52 |
% |
353.52 |
% |
Capital Resources
Our primary source of stockholders equity is the retention of our net after tax earnings and proceeds from the issuance of common stock. At March 31, 2004, stockholders equity totaled $109.3 million, a 14% increase from December 31, 2003. The increase in stockholders equity is primarily due to: (1) the issuance of 542,632 shares of CoBiz common stock valued at $9.4 million to the former shareholders of FDL pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement, (2) net income of $3.6 million from the first quarter of 2004, (3) $0.8 million from the issuance of common stock from option exercises, and (4) $0.7 million from unrealized appreciation on available-for-sale securities. These transactions were offset by $0.9 million in dividends paid on our common stock.
We are subject to minimum risk-based capital limitations as set forth by federal banking regulations at both the consolidated Company level and the Bank level. Under the risk-based capital guidelines, different categories of assets, including certain off-balance sheet items, such as loan commitments in excess of one year and letters of credit, are assigned different risk weights, based generally on the perceived credit risk of the asset. These risk weights are multiplied by corresponding asset balances to determine a risk-weighted asset base. For purposes of the risk-based capital guidelines, total capital is defined as the sum of Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital elements, with Tier 2 capital being limited to 100% of Tier 1 capital. Tier 1 capital includes, with certain restrictions, common shareholders 6; equity, perpetual preferred stock, and minority interests in consolidated subsidiaries. Tier 2 capital includes, with certain limitations, perpetual preferred stock not included in Tier 1 capital, certain maturing capital instruments, and the allowance for loan and lease losses. As of March 31, 2004, the Company and the Bank are considered Well Capitalized under the regulatory risk based capital guidelines.
22
Liquidity
Our liquidity management objective is to ensure our ability to satisfy the cash flow requirements of depositors and borrowers, and to allow us to sustain our operations. Historically, our primary source of funds has been customer deposits. Scheduled loan and lease repayments are a relatively stable source of funds, while deposit inflows and unscheduled loan and lease prepayments - which are influenced by fluctuations in the general level of interest rates, returns available on other investments, competition, economic conditions, and other factors - are relatively unstable. In addition, the Company has commitments to extend credit under lines of credit and stand-by letters of credit. The Company has also committed to investing in certain partnerships. 160; Borrowings may be used on a short-term basis to compensate for reductions in other sources of funds (such as deposit inflows at less than projected levels). Borrowings may also be used on a longer-term basis to support expanded lending activities and to match the maturity or repricing intervals of assets. The Company is required under federal banking regulations to maintain sufficient reserves to fund deposit withdrawals, loan commitments, and expenses. We monitor our cash position on a daily basis in order to meet these requirements.
We use various forms of short-term borrowings for cash management and liquidity purposes on a limited basis. These forms of borrowings include federal funds purchased, securities sold under agreements to re purchase, the State of Colorado Treasurys Time Deposit program, and borrowings from the FHLB. The Bank has approved federal funds purchase lines with seven other banks with an aggregate credit line of $156.8 million as well as credit lines of $105.0 million with three firms to transact repurchase agreements. In addition, the Bank may apply for up to $66.4 million of State of Colorado time deposits. The Bank also has a line of credit from the FHLB that is limited by the amount of eligible collateral available to secure it. Borrowings under the FHLB line are required to be secured by unpledged securities and qualifying loans. At March 31, 2004, we had $181.9 million in unpledged securities available to collateralize FHLB borrowings and securities sold under agreements to repurchase.
At the holding company level, our primary source of funds are dividends paid from the Bank, management fees assessed to the Bank and the fee-based business lines, proceeds from the issuance of common stock, and other capital markets activity. The main use of this liquidity is the quarterly payment of dividends on our common stock, quarterly interest payments on the junior subordinated debentures, payments for mergers and acquisitions activity (including potential earn-out payments), and payments for the salaries and benefits for the employees of the holding company. The approval of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency is required prior to the declaration of any dividend by the Bank if the total of all dividends declared by the Bank in any calendar year exceeds the total of its net profits for that year combined with the retained net profits for the preceding two years. In addition, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 provide s that the Bank cannot pay a dividend if it will cause the Bank to be undercapitalized. The Companys ability to pay dividends on its common stock depends upon the availability of dividends from the Bank and earnings from its fee-based businesses, and upon the Companys compliance with the capital adequacy guidelines of the FRB.
Net cash provided by operating activities totaled $3.8 million and $3.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The principal component of net cash provided by operating activities is net income adjusted by depreciation and amortization, provision for loan losses and changes in other assets and liabilities. The increase in the net cash provided by operating activ ities is primarily due to the higher net income earned in 2004 as compared to the same period in 2003.
Net cash used in investing activities totaled $39.1 million and $36.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The increase in cash used in investing activities is primarily related to a $7.5 million increase in loan originations, a $9.4 million cash payment to the
23
former shareholders of FDL pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement, offset by a $14.4 million reduction in net cash outflows related to the purchase of investment securities due to the sale of $35.4 million in mortgage-backed securities during the first quarter of 2004.
Net cash provided by financing activities totaled $35.1 million and $38.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The decrease in net cash provided by financing activities is primarily attributed to a $23.2 million decrease in deposit inflows, a $6.3 million decrease in securities sold under agreement to repurchase, and a $4.1 million decrease in net advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank. These decreases were offset by a $29.6 million increase in cash inflows from fed funds purchased.
Effects of Inflation and Changing Prices
The primary impact of inflation on our operations is increased operating costs. Unlike most retail or manufacturing companies, virtually all of the assets and liabilities of a financial institution such as the Bank are monetary in nature. As a result, the impact of interest rates on a financial institutions performance is generally greater than the impact of inflation. Although interest rates do not necessarily move in the same direction, or to the same extent, as the prices of goods and services, increases in inflation generally have resulted in increased interest rates. Over short periods of time, interest rates may not move in the same direction, or at the same magnitude, as inflation.
Forward Looking Statements
The discussion in this report contains forward-looking statements, which are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. The forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that affect our operations, financial performance, and other factors as discussed in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These risks include the impact of economic conditions and interest rates, loan and lease losses, risks related to the execution of our growth strategy, the possible loss of key personnel, factors that could affect our ability to compete in our trade areas, changes in regulations and government policies, and other factors discussed in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
As of March 31, 2004, there have been no material changes in the quantitative and qualitative information about market risk provided pursuant to Item 305 of Regulation S-K as presented in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. The Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Companys management, including the Companys Chief Executive Officer and the Companys Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e) as of March 31, 2004. Based upon that evaluation, the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information relating to the Company (including its consolidated subsidiaries) required to be included in the Companys periodic Securities and Exchange Commission filings.
24
Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control. There was no change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended March 31, 2004, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Item 2. Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds
On January 29, 2004, CoBiz issued 542,632 shares of its Common Stock to the former shareholders of FDL pursuant to earn-out provisions of the merger agreement pursuant to which FDL was acquired in 2003. See Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements for additional discussion of the earn-out payment. The shares were issued without registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, in reliance on the exemption afforded by Section 4(2) of the Act and Regulation D promulgated thereunder.
On April 13, 2004, the Company declared a three-for-two stock split that was effected through a stock dividend for shareholders of record on April 26, 2004, and payable on May 3, 2004. See Note 4 of Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements for additional discussion of the stock dividend.
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K.
(a) Financial Statements.
See Index to Consolidated Financial Statements.
(b) Exhibits and Index of Exhibits.
(1) |
2 |
Amended and Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger dated November 28, |
|
|
2000. |
|
|
|
(2)(3) |
3.1 |
Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant. |
|
|
|
(2) |
3.2 |
Amendment to Articles of Incorporation. |
|
|
|
(10) |
3.3 |
Amendment to Articles of Incorporation. |
|
|
|
(2) |
3.4 |
Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant. |
|
|
|
(9) |
3.5 |
Amendment to Bylaws. |
|
|
|
(4) |
4.1 |
Form of Indenture. |
25
|
|
|
(4) |
4.2 |
Form of Subordinated Debenture (included as an exhibit to Exhibit 4.1). |
|
|
|
(4) |
4.3 |
Certificate of Trust. |
|
|
|
(4) |
4.4 |
Form of Trust Agreement. |
|
|
|
(4) |
4.5 |
Form of Amended and Restated Trust Agreement. |
|
|
|
(4) |
4.6 |
Form of Capital Securities Certificate (included as an exhibit to Exhibit 4.5). |
|
|
|
(4) |
4.7 |
Form of Capital Securities Guarantee Agreement. |
|
|
|
(4) |
4.8 |
Form of Agreement of Expenses and Liabilities (included as an exhibit to |
|
|
Exhibit 4.5). |
|
|
|
(2) |
10.1 |
CoBiz Inc. 1998 Stock Incentive Plan. |
|
|
|
(2) |
10.2 |
Amended and Restated CoBiz Inc. 1997 Incentive Stock Option Plan. |
|
|
|
(2) |
10.3 |
Amended and Restated CoBiz Inc. 1995 Incentive Stock Option Plan. |
|
|
|
+(2) |
10.4 |
License Agreement, dated at November 19, 1997, by and between Jack Henry |
|
|
& Associates, Inc. and Colorado Business Bank, N.A. |
|
|
|
+(2) |
10.5 |
Contract Modification, dated at November 19, 1997, by and between Jack |
|
|
Henry & Associates, Inc. and Colorado Business Bank, N.A. |
|
|
|
+(2) |
10.6 |
Computer Software Maintenance Agreement, dated at November 19, 1997, by |
|
|
and between Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. and Colorado Business Bank, N.A. |
|
|
|
(2) |
10.7 |
Employment Agreement, dated at March 1, 1995, by and between Equitable |
|
|
Bankshares of Colorado, Inc. and Jonathan C. Lorenz. |
|
|
|
(2) |
10.8 |
Employment Agreement, dated at May 8, 1995, by and between Equitable |
|
|
Bankshares of Colorado, Inc. and Virginia K. Berkeley. |
|
|
|
(2) |
10.9 |
Employment Agreement, dated at January 3, 1998, by and between CoBiz Inc. |
|
|
and Richard J. Dalton. |
|
|
|
(5) |
10.10 |
Lease Agreement between Kesef, LLC and CoBiz Inc. |
|
|
|
(7) |
10.11 |
First Amendment to Lease Agreement between Kesef, LLC and Colorado |
|
|
Business Bankshares, Inc. dated May 1, 1998. |
|
|
|
(8) |
10.12 |
2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. |
|
|
|
(9) |
10.13 |
2002 Equity Incentive Plan. |
|
|
|
(11) |
10.14 |
Employment Agreement, dated August 12, 2003, by and between CoBiz |
|
|
Inc. and Lyne B. Andrich. |
26
|
|
|
(11) |
10.15 |
Employment Agreement, dated August 12, 2003, by and between CoBiz Inc. |
|
|
and Kevin W. Ahern. |
|
|
|
(12) |
10.16 |
Lease Agreement between Zahav and First Capital Bank of Arizona dated June 15, 2001. |
|
|
|
(12) |
10.17 |
Lease Agreement between Dorit, LLC and Colorado Business Bank, N.A. dated |
|
|
March 31, 2003. |
|
|
|
(12) |
10.18 |
Employment Agreement, dated March 8, 2001, by and between First Capital |
|
|
Bank of Arizona and Harold F. Mosanko. |
|
|
|
(12) |
14 |
Code of Conduct and Ethics. |
|
|
|
(12) |
21 |
List of subsidiaries. |
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of the Chief Executive Officer. |
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of the Chief Financial Officer. |
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
Section 1350 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer. |
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
Section 1350 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer. |
(1) Incorporated herein by reference from the Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-51866).
(2) Incorporated herein by reference from the Registrants Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (File No. 333-50037).
(3) Incorporated herein by reference from the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, as filed on March 23, 2001.
(4) Incorporated herein by reference from the Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-37674).
(5) Incorporated herein by reference from the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 1998, as filed on November 13, 1998.
(6) Incorporated herein by reference from the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2000, as filed on May 12, 2000.
(7) Incorporated herein by reference from the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2000, as filed on November 14, 2000.
(8) Incorporated herein by reference from the Registrants Proxy Statement filed in connection with its 2000 annual meeting of shareholders, as filed on April 19, 2000.
(9) Incorporated herein by reference from the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002, as filed on August 14, 2002.
27
(10) Incorporated herein by reference from the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003, as filed on May 14, 2003.
(11) Incorporated herein by reference from the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, as filed on November 13, 2003.
(12) Incorporated herein by reference from the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed on March 12, 2004.
+ Confidential treatment has been granted by the Securities and Exchange Commission as to certain portions of exhibit. Such portions have been redacted.
(c) Reports on Form 8-K
On February 17, 2004 we filed a current report on Form 8-K under Item 7. Financial Statements and Exhibits and Item 12. Results of Operations and Financial Condition, reporting that we issued a press release on January 22, 2004 with the financial results for the quarter ended December 31, 2003. The information in this report on Form 8-K shall not deemed to be filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and shall not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other document filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.
28
In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
COBIZ INC.
Date: |
|
May 10, 2004 |
|
By |
|
/s/ Steven Bangert |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven Bangert, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: |
|
May 10, 2004 |
|
By |
|
/s/ Lyne B. Andrich |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lyne B. Andrich, Executive Vice President and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
29