Back to GetFilings.com



 

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

FORM 10-Q

 

 

(Mark One)

 

 

ý

 

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

 

 

For the quarterly period ended January 31, 2004

 

 

 

OR

 

 

 

o

 

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

 

 

For the transition period from                 to                

 

 

 

Commission file number 000-26209

 

 

Ditech Communications Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware

 

94-2935531

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

 

 

 

825 East Middlefield Road Mountain View, California 94043

(Address, including zip code of registrant’s principal executive offices)

 

(650)623-1300

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to the filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES ý    NO o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2of the Exchange Act). YES o    NO ý

 

As of February 29, 2004, 32,657,644 shares of the Registrant’s common stock were outstanding.

 

 



 

DITECH COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

ITEM 1.

 

Financial Statements (unaudited)

 

 

 

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED JANUARY 31, 2004 AND 2003

 

 

 

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
AS OF JANUARY 31, 2004 AND APRIL 30, 2003

 

 

 

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
NINE MONTHS ENDED JANUARY 31, 2004 AND 2003

 

 

 

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

 

ITEM 2.

 

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

ITEM 3

 

Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosures About Market Risk

 

ITEM 4

 

Controls and Procedures

 

 

 

 

 

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

 

ITEM 1.

 

Legal Proceedings

 

ITEM 2.

 

Changes in Securities, Use of Proceeds and Issuer Repurchases of Equity Securities

 

ITEM 3.

 

Defaults Upon Senior Securities

 

ITEM 4.

 

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

 

ITEM 5.

 

Other Information

 

ITEM 6.

 

Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

 

Signatures

 

 

 

 

2



 

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

ITEM I.    Financial Statements (unaudited)

 

Ditech Communications Corporation
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)

 

 

Three months ended
January 31,

 

Nine months ended
January 31,

 

 

 

2004

 

2003

 

2004

 

2003

 

Revenue

 

$

21,303

 

$

9,147

 

$

46,507

 

$

25,042

 

Cost of goods sold

 

7,261

 

3,187

 

15,952

 

9,902

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross profit

 

14,042

 

5,960

 

30,555

 

15,140

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sales and marketing

 

3,305

 

3,245

 

9,313

 

9,622

 

Research and development

 

2,674

 

2,201

 

7,842

 

7,255

 

General and administrative

 

1,411

 

1,308

 

3,987

 

4,065

 

Restructuring charge

 

 

 

1,016

 

 

Total operating expenses

 

7,390

 

6,754

 

22,158

 

20,942

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 

6,652

 

(794

)

8,397

 

(5,802

)

Other income, net

 

311

 

437

 

970

 

1,408

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations before provision for income taxes and cumulative effect of accounting change

 

6,963

 

(357

)

9,367

 

(4,394

)

Provision for income taxes

 

133

 

 

127

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations before cumulative effect of accounting change

 

6,830

 

(357

)

9,240

 

(4,394

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Discontinued operations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loss from discontinued operations

 

 

(3,251

)

(2,550

)

(30,042

)

Gain (loss) on disposition, net of $133 tax benefit for the three and nine-month periods ended January 31, 2004

 

95

 

 

(6,797

)

 

Gain (loss) from discontinued operations

 

95

 

(3,251

)

(9,347

)

(30,042

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income (loss) before cumulative effect of accounting change

 

6,925

 

(3,608

)

(107

)

(34,436

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cumulative effect of accounting change

 

 

 

 

(36,837

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

6,925

 

$

(3,608

)

$

(107

)

$

(71,273

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic income (loss) per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

From continuing operations before cumulative effect of accounting change

 

$

0.21

 

$

(0.01

)

$

0.29

 

$

(0.15

)

From discontinued operations

 

 

(0.11

)

(0.29

)

(0.99

)

From cumulative effect of accounting change

 

 

 

 

(1.21

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic net income (loss) per share

 

$

0.21

 

$

(0.12

)

$

(0.00

)

$

(2.35

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted income (loss) per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

From continuing operations before cumulative effect of accounting change

 

$

0.20

 

$

(0.01

)

$

0.28

 

$

(0.15

)

From discontinued operations

 

 

(0.11

)

(0.28

)

(0.99

)

From cumulative effect of accounting change

 

 

 

 

(1.21

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted net income (loss) per share

 

$

0.20

 

$

(0.12

)

$

(0.00

)

$

(2.35

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted shares used in per share calculation:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

32,291

 

30,447

 

31,400

 

30,343

 

Diluted

 

34,852

 

30,447

 

32,964

 

30,343

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

3



 

Ditech Communications Corporation
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands)
(unaudited)

 

 

 

January 31,
2004

 

April 30,
2003

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

92,996

 

$

94,495

 

Short-term investments

 

22,076

 

 

Accounts receivable, net

 

2,254

 

6,249

 

Inventories

 

7,147

 

8,467

 

Other current assets

 

6,206

 

4,510

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total current assets

 

130,679

 

113,721

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long-term investments

 

5,533

 

 

Property and equipment, net

 

3,190

 

8,893

 

Other assets

 

2,052

 

3,827

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Assets

 

$

141,454

 

$

126,441

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable

 

$

1,210

 

$

2,323

 

Accrued expenses

 

9,450

 

6,026

 

Deferred revenue

 

3,207

 

121

 

Income taxes payable

 

1,800

 

1,833

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

 

15,667

 

10,303

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock

 

33

 

30

 

Additional paid-in capital

 

279,835

 

270,008

 

Accumulated deficit

 

(154,087

)

(153,980

)

Other comprehensive income

 

6

 

80

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total stockholders’ equity

 

125,787

 

116,138

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

 

$

141,454

 

$

126,441

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

4



 

Ditech Communications Corporation
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)
(unaudited)

 

 

 

Nine months ended January 31,

 

 

 

2004

 

2003

 

Cash flows from operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss

 

$

(107

)

$

(71,273

)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Loss from discontinued operations

 

6,021

 

8,975

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

2,316

 

4,148

 

Cumulative effect of accounting change

 

 

36,837

 

Amortization of deferred stock compensation

 

 

1,957

 

Restructuring costs and other special charges

 

795

 

 

Allowance for doubtful accounts

 

(300

)

100

 

Deferred income tax

 

 

57

 

Other

 

(5

)

75

 

Changes in assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable

 

4,295

 

(2,303

)

Inventories

 

(627

)

1,132

 

Other current assets

 

(345

)

(615

)

Income taxes

 

(33

)

16,181

 

Accounts payable

 

(1,113

)

(605

)

Accrued expenses

 

1,345

 

(2,011

)

Deferred revenue

 

3,086

 

(2,765

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

 

15,328

 

(10,110

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from investing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Purchases of property and equipment

 

(1,246

)

(4,197

)

Investment in other assets

 

(318

)

(22

)

Collection of note receivable and related interest

 

834

 

 

Purchases of available for sale investments

 

(28,734

)

 

Sales and maturities of available for sale investments

 

1,149

 

 

Disposal of discontinued optical business

 

1,794

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net cash used in investing activities

 

(26,521

)

(4,219

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from employee stock plan issuances

 

9,694

 

733

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net cash provided by financing activities

 

9,694

 

733

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents

 

(1,499

)

(13,596

)

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period

 

94,495

 

105,909

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period

 

$

92,996

 

$

92,313

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

5



 

DITECH COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)

 

1.             DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

 

Ditech Communications Corporation (the “Company”) designs, develops and markets telecommunications equipment designed to enhance voice quality over wire-line and wireless telecommunications networks.  These products include the Company’s long-standing echo cancellation functionality, as well as its new voice quality features, including noise reduction, voice level control and enhanced voice intelligibility. The Company has established a direct sales force that sells its products in the U.S. and internationally.  In addition, the Company is expanding its utilization of value added resellers, distributors and original equipment manufacturers, primarily internationally but also domestically.

 

2.             SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

Basis of Presentation

 

The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements as of January 31, 2004, and for the three and nine-month periods ended January 31, 2004 and 2003, together with the related notes, are unaudited but include all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for the fair presentation, in all material respects, of the financial position and the operating results and cash flows for the interim date and periods presented. Results for the interim periods ended January 31, 2004 are not necessarily indicative of results for the entire fiscal year or future periods. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes thereto for the year ended April 30, 2003, included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 15, 2003, file number 000-26209.

 

In May 2003, the Company announced its intention to exit the optical communications portion of its business. In July 2003, the Company executed a sale of a substantial portion of the assets used in the optical business.  As a result, the optical business has been presented as a discontinued operation in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for all periods presented.  See Note 4 for a further discussion of the discontinued operations.

 

Computation of Income (Loss) per Share

 

Basic income (loss) per share is calculated based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period less shares subject to repurchase, which are considered contingently issuable shares. Diluted income per share is calculated based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock and common stock equivalents outstanding, including the dilutive effect of stock options, using the treasury stock method, and common stock subject to repurchase. Diluted loss per share is calculated excluding the effects of all common stock equivalents, as their effect would be anti-dilutive.

 

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

 

The total comprehensive income (loss) for the three and nine-month periods ended January 31, 2004 was $6.9 million and $(101,000), respectively, which reflects the impact of recognizing the foreign currency translation adjustment in the first quarter of fiscal 2004 due to the substantial liquidation of the Company’s international operations and unrealized gains on short-term and long-term investments beginning in the third quarter of fiscal 2004. For the three and nine-month periods ended January 31, 2003, comprehensive loss was $3.6 million and $71.2 million, respectively, and included the impact of foreign currency translation adjustments related to the Company’s international operations, net of tax.

 

Investments

 

In an effort to improve the return on invested funds, the Company has recently begun to invest in securities with maturities of greater than three months but less than two years.  Investment securities that have maturities of more than three months at the date of purchase but current maturities of less than one year are considered short-term investments.  Investment securities with remaining maturities of one year or more are considered long-term investments. Short-term and long-term investments consist primarily of U.S. Government securities and corporate bonds, as well as, commercial paper, asset backed securities and certificates of deposit. Short-term and long-term investments are currently maintained at one major financial institution, are classified as available-for-sale, and are recorded on the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value. Unrealized holding gains and losses are included as a separate component of other comprehensive income on the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, net of any related tax effect. Realized gains and losses are calculated based on the specific identification method and are included in other

 

6



 

income, net on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.

 

Reclassifications

 

Certain items in the condensed consolidated financial statements for the three and nine-month periods ended January 31, 2003 have been reclassified to conform to classifications used in the current fiscal year.

 

Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation
 

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-based Compensation,” (“SFAS 123”), encourages, but does not require, companies to record compensation cost for stock-based compensation plans at fair value. The Company accounts for grants of equity instruments to employees using the intrinsic value method described in Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” and complies with the disclosure provisions of SFAS 123. Accordingly, compensation cost for stock options is measured as the excess, if any, of the quoted market price of the Company’s stock at the date of the grant over the amount an employee must pay to acquire the stock and is recognized over the vesting period of the related shares.

 

If compensation cost for the Company’s stock plans had been determined based on the fair value at the grant dates for awards under those plans consistent with the provisions of SFAS 123, the Company’s net income (loss) for the three and nine month periods ended January 31, 2004 and 2003 would have been adjusted to the pro forma amounts indicated in the following table (in thousands, except per share amounts):

 

 

Three months ended
January 31,

 

Nine months ended
January 31,

 

 

 

2004

 

2003

 

2004

 

2003

 

Net income (loss) as reported

 

$

6,925

 

$

(3,608

)

$

(107

)

$

(71,273

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Add: Stock-based compensation expense included in reported net loss, net of applicable tax effects

 

 

452

 

 

1,916

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deduct: Stock-based compensation determined under the fair value method for all stock awards, net of applicable taxes

 

(5,145

)

(1,476

)

(5,300

)

(11,671

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pro forma net income (loss)

 

$

1,780

 

$

(4,632

)

$

(5,407

)

$

(81,028

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted net income (loss) per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As reported

 

$

0.20

 

$

(0.12

)

$

(0.00

)

$

(2.35

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pro forma

 

$

0.05

 

$

(0.15

)

$

(0.16

)

$

(2.67

)

 

3.             BALANCE SHEET ACCOUNTS

 

Inventories comprised (in thousands):

 

 

January 31,
2004

 

April 30,
2003

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Raw materials

 

$

1,502

 

$

4,316

 

Work in progress

 

110

 

185

 

Finished goods

 

5,535

 

3,966

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

7,147

 

$

8,467

 

 

Finished goods inventory at January 31, 2004 included approximately $2.9 million of inventory associated with deferred revenue transactions.

 

7



 

The following tables summarize the Company’s investments as of Janaury 31, 2004 (in thousands):

 

 

 

Cost

 

Gross
Unrealized
Gains

 

Gross
Unrealized
Losses

 

Fair
Value

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. government obligations

 

$

9,339

 

$

8

 

$

(1

)

$

9,346

 

Corporate notes

 

9,699

 

2

 

(5

)

9,696

 

Asset backed securities

 

3,512

 

2

 

 

3,514

 

Commerical paper

 

2,995

 

 

 

2,995

 

Certificates of deposit

 

2,058

 

 

 

2,058

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

27,603

 

$

12

 

$

(6

)

$

27,609

 

 

These investments were reported as:

 

Short-term investments

 

$

22,076

 

Long-term investments

 

5,533

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

27,609

 

 

For the three and nine months ended January 31, 2004, no gains or loss had been realized on the sale of short-term and long-term investments. As of January 31, 2004, net unrealized holding gains of $6,000 were included in other comprehensive income in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, net of any related tax effect.

 

The following table summarizes the maturities of the Company’s investments as of January 31, 2004 (in thousands):

 

 

 

Cost

 

Fair Value

 

Less than one year

 

$

22,075

 

$

22,076

 

Due in 1 – 2 years

 

5,528

 

5,533

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

27,603

 

$

27,609

 

 

Accrued expenses comprised (in thousands):

 

 

January 31,
2004

 

April 30,
2003

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accrued employee related

 

$

2,934

 

$

2,878

 

Accrued warranty

 

1,959

 

1,588

 

Accrued restructuring and discontinued operations costs

 

2,094

 

 

Other accrued expenses

 

2,463

 

1,560

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

9,450

 

$

6,026

 

 

Warranties. The Company provides for future warranty costs upon shipment of its products. The specific terms and conditions of those warranties may vary depending upon the product sold, the customer and the country in which it does business. However, the Company’s warranties generally start from the shipment date and continue for a period of two to five years. As part of the sale of the Company’s optical business to JDS Uniphase (“JDSU”), see Note 4, the Company has retained its warranty obligations for optical products sold prior to July 16, 2003.  Pursuant to the terms of the agreement with JDSU, JDSU will perform warranty repairs on the Company’s behalf and then bill the Company for the cost of those services at rates stipulated in the agreement.

 

Because the Company’s products are manufactured to a standardized specification and products are internally tested to these specifications prior to shipment, the Company historically has experienced minimal warranty costs. Factors that affect the Company’s

 

8



 

warranty liability include the number of installed units, historical experience and management’s judgment regarding anticipated rates of warranty claims and cost per claim. The Company assesses the adequacy of its recorded warranty liabilities every quarter and makes adjustments to the liability, if necessary.

 

Changes in the warranty liability, which is included as a component of “Accrued expenses” on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet, during the three and nine-month periods ended January 31, 2004 and 2003 are as follows (in thousands):

 

 

Three months ended
January 31,

 

Nine months ended
January 31,

 

 

 

2004

 

2003

 

2004

 

2003

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance as of the beginning of the fiscal period

 

$

1,685

 

$

1,467

 

$

1,588

 

$

1,178

 

Provision for warranties issued during fiscal period

 

372

 

196

 

728

 

697

 

Warranty costs incurred during fiscal period

 

(98

)

(135

)

(377

)

(465

)

Other adjustments to the liability (including changes in estimates for pre-existing warranties) during fiscal period

 

 

 

20

 

118

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance as of January 31

 

$

1,959

 

$

1,528

 

$

1,959

 

$

1,528

 

 

Guarantees and Indemnifications. As is customary in the Company’s industry, and as required by law in the U.S. and certain other jurisdictions, certain of the Company’s contracts provide remedies to its customers, such as defense, settlement, or payment of judgment for intellectual property claims related to the use of the Company’s products. From time to time, the Company indemnifies customers against combinations of losses, expenses, or liabilities arising from various trigger events related to the sale and the use of the Company’s products and services. In addition, from time to time the Company also provides protection to customers against claims related to undiscovered liabilities, additional product liability or environmental obligations. In the Company’s experience, claims made under such indemnifications are rare. In connection with the sale of the Company’s echo cancellation software technology to Texas Instruments (TI) in April 2002 and the sale of the Company’s optical business to JDSU in July 2003, the Company indemnified TI and JDSU for various matters. The Company believes the estimated fair value of these indemnifications is not material.

 

As permitted or required under Delaware law and to the maximum extent allowable under that law, the Company has certain obligations to indemnify its current and former officers and directors for certain events or occurrences while the officer or director is, or was serving at the Company’s request in such capacity. These indemnification obligations are valid as long as the director or officer acted in good faith and in a manner that a person reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the Company, and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe his or her conduct was unlawful. The maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make under these indemnification obligations is unlimited; however, the Company has a director and officer insurance policy that limits the Company’s exposure and enables the Company to recover a portion of any future amounts paid. As a result of the Company’s insurance policy coverage, the Company believes the estimated fair value of these indemnification obligations is minimal.

 

4.             DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

 

On July 16, 2003, the Company completed the primary step in the planned exit of its optical communications business through the sale of a large portion of the assets of its optical communications business to JDSU, pursuant to an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”).  The assets sold consisted primarily of inventory, certain specified optical-related equipment and intellectual property rights, which were sold for an aggregate purchase price of up to approximately $6.5 million in cash, of which (i) approximately $1.4 million was paid to the Company at closing, (ii) $225,000 will be paid to the Company one year from the closing (subject to reduction in the event any successful indemnification claims are made against the Company), and (iii) up to an additional $4.9 million to be paid to the Company, which is comprised of up to $900,000 based on the level of inventory consumed by JDSU, and up to $4.0 million based on revenues generated by the optical business acquired by JDSU through June 30, 2005, if any.  Additionally, JDSU has the right to require the Company to repurchase or reimburse JDSU for any purchased but unused inventory at June 30, 2004, up to $2.0 million, and certain costs incurred by JDSU in connection with the performance of certain warranty obligations relating to optical products that were sold by the Company prior to July 16, 2003. During the three months ended January 31, 2004, the Company recognized $563,000 associated with the level of revenue generated by JDSU since the close of the sale and a $133,000 tax benefit associated with the year-to-date loss from disposal, which benefit offset the domestic tax provision recognized from continuing operations.  The incremental sales proceeds and the tax benefit were substantially offset by incremental loss accruals associated with closure of the Company’s international optical operations.  The net effect of these items was reported as a net gain on disposal of discontinued operations in the condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations for the three-month period ended January 31, 2004.

 

9



 

The Company has been aggressively pursuing the disposition, through sale, sublease or abandonment, of assets not included in the Purchase Agreement and the facility leases for the Company’s Australian and United Kingdom optical research facilities. As of January 31, 2004, the Company had exited its United Kingdom facility lease and had sold substantially all of the assets at these two international research operations.  In February 2004, the Company exited its Australian facility lease.  The Company is still in the process of disposing of the remaining optical assets located in the United States.  As a result of exiting the optical business, the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations reflect the optical business as a discontinued operation for all periods presented.

 

Certain information with respect to the discontinued optical communications business’ operations is summarized below (in thousands):

 

 

Three months ended
January 31,

 

Nine months ended
January 31,

 

 

 

2004

 

2003

 

2004

 

2003

 

Revenue

 

$

 

$

3,165

 

$

1,656

 

$

10,293

 

Gross profit (loss)

 

 

556

 

269

 

(485

)

Operating expenses

 

 

3,795

 

2,807

 

29,437

 

Operating loss

 

 

(3,239

)

(2,538

)

(29,922

)

Income tax provision

 

 

12

 

12

 

120

 

Net loss from discontinued operations

 

 

(3,251

)

(2,550

)

(30,042

)

 

The results for the nine months ended January 31, 2003 include a restructuring charge and loss associated with impaired assets of $6.8 million related to the discontinuation of the Company’s Titanium optical system level product.  This charge was included in operating expenses.  In addition, the Company recognized an inventory write-down of $4.2 million related to the Titanium product, which write-down was included in cost of goods sold and resulted in a negative gross margin for the year-to-date period in fiscal 2003.

 

The following table shows the components of the gain (loss) from the disposal of the Company’s discontinued operations for the three and nine-month periods ended January 31, 2004 (in thousands):

 

 

Three months ended
January 31, 2004

 

Nine months ended
January 31, 2004

 

Proceeds from sale

 

$

563

 

$

3,134

 

Less:  Net book value of assets sold

 

 

4,671

 

Transaction costs

 

 

221

 

Gain (loss) on sale

 

563

 

(1,758

)

Less:  Costs to exit remainder of optical business

 

601

 

5,172

 

Plus:  Benefit for income taxes

 

133

 

133

 

Net gain (loss) on disposition

 

$

95

 

$

(6,797

)

 

Due to the Company’s net operating loss carry forward position and related full valuation allowance, no federal or state tax benefit was recorded associated with the loss on the disposal of the optical business prior to third quarter of fiscal 2004.  In the third quarter of fiscal 2004, a tax benefit from the disposition of $133,000 was recognized, which offset the tax provision from continuing operations.  The costs of exiting the optical business included severance and related costs for optical employees not hired by JDSU of $1.6 million, of which $1.4 million had been paid as of January 31, 2004, impairment of optical assets not acquired by JDSU of $2.7 million and losses associated with abandonment of facility leases related to the Company’s UK and Australian optical development operations of $275,000.

 

5.             RESTRUCTURING CHARGES

 

As a result of the Company’s decision to exit the optical communications business in the first quarter of fiscal 2004, the Company incurred certain restructuring charges associated with general costs that did not qualify for discontinued operations treatment.  The restructuring was designed to reduce the level of certain general costs that were deemed excess as a result of the Company’s decision to exit its optical business and included a loss reserve for excess leased space in the Company’s Mountain View, California headquarters and severance of certain corporate level employees.

 

As a result of this restructuring, the Company recorded restructuring charges of $1.0 million, which have been classified as operating expenses. The following paragraphs provide detailed information on each of the components of the restructuring charges, which were recorded in the first quarter of fiscal 2004.

 

10



 

Workforce Reduction. The restructuring resulted in the termination of two employees whose focus was primarily corporate in nature. The workforce reductions were substantially completed in the first quarter of fiscal 2004. The Company recorded a workforce reduction charge of approximately $21,000 relating to severance pay and continuation of certain fringe benefits for the impacted employees.

 

Lease Loss Provision. The Company recorded a $995,000 restructuring charge associated with the abandonment of excess leased space in its Mountain View headquarters.  The charge was based on the monthly rental and related costs on the abandoned space of approximately 11,000 square feet less the anticipated sublease income that the Company hopes to derive from the space based on current market conditions in the Mountain View area and impairment of leasehold improvements associated with the abandoned space.

 

As of the end of January 2004, virtually all of the costs associated with the severances and related benefits had been paid. The lease loss provision will be utilized over the remaining term of the lease, which expires in June 2006.  As the restructuring of these corporate level costs did not occur until the end of July 2003, the Company did not realize any significant savings in the first quarter of fiscal 2004 but realized savings of approximately $100,000 during the third quarter of fiscal 2004 ended January 31, 2004 and approximately $200,000 during the nine months ended January 31, 2004, which was consistent with the Company’s expectations.

 

6.             BORROWING AGREEMENT

 

Effective August 28, 2003, the Company renewed its $2.0 million operating line of credit agreement with its bank.  The renewed line of credit, which expires on July 31, 2004, carries the same basic terms as the original line of credit with some reduction and/or elimination of certain of the financial covenants. As of January 31, 2004, the Company had no borrowings outstanding under the line of credit.

 

7.             ACCOUNTING FOR GOODWILL

 

The Company performed a transitional impairment test of its goodwill and intangible assets as of May 1, 2002. Due to the continuing soft telecommunications market and the depressed values of telecommunications equipment provider stocks, the Company recorded a transitional goodwill impairment loss of $36.8 million which was recorded as a cumulative effect of an accounting change in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for fiscal 2003. The fair value of the optical reporting unit giving rise to the transitional impairment loss was estimated using a combination of the expected present value of future cash flows and a market value approach.

 

8.             REPORTABLE SEGMENTS AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION

 

As a result of the Company exiting the optical communications business in the first quarter of fiscal 2004, that segment is now being reported as a discontinued operation in the condensed consolidated statements of operations for all periods presented.  As

such, the Company currently operates in a single segment, voice quality products, and segment data will no longer be reported.

 

Geographic revenue information comprised (in thousands):

 

 

Three months ended
January 31,

 

Nine months ended
January 31,

 

 

 

2004

 

2003

 

2004

 

2003

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

USA

 

$

19,729

 

$

7,710

 

$

42,806

 

$

21,680

 

Canada

 

163

 

103

 

666

 

662

 

Europe

 

733

 

480

 

1,613

 

1,083

 

Far East

 

163

 

845

 

879

 

1,212

 

Rest of World

 

515

 

9

 

543

 

405

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

21,303

 

$

9,147

 

$

46,507

 

$

25,042

 

 

Sales for the three- and nine-month periods ended January 31, 2004 included two customers (41.5% and 37.7%) and three customers (41.2%, 27.5% and 14.6%), respectively that represented greater than 10% of total revenue. Sales for the three- and nine-month periods ended January 31, 2003 each included two customers (56.5% and 16.3%) and (54.6% and 16.1%), respectively that represented greater than 10% of total revenue.  The Company’s gross accounts receivable were concentrated with three customers at January 31, 2004 (representing 22%, 15% and 10% of receivables) and three customers at April 30, 2003 (representing 34%, 18% and 15% of receivables).

 

11



 

As of January 31, 2004 and April 30, 2003, the Company maintained its long-lived assets in the following countries (in thousands):

 

 

 

July 31, 2003

 

April 30, 2003

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

USA

 

$

3,190

 

$

7,358

 

United Kingdom

 

 

803

 

Australia

 

 

732

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

3,190

 

$

8,893

 

 

The decline in long-lived assets during the first nine months of fiscal 2004 is due to the sale and/or impairment of optical long-lived assets due to exiting the optical business.  As the Company’s international operations in the United Kingdom and Australia were dedicated to optical research, all of their assets have been sold or impaired.

 

12



 

Item 2—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto for the year ended April 30, 2003, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 15, 2003. The discussion in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, such as statements of our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed here. See “Future Growth and Operating Results Subject to Risk” at the end of this Item 2 for factors that could cause future results to differ materially.

 

Overview

 

We design, develop and market equipment used in building, expanding and modernizing telecommunications networks. As a result of announcing our intention to exit our optical communications business and completion of the sale of a substantial portion of assets used in our optical business in the first quarter of fiscal 2004, our continuing operations are currently focused solely on our voice quality products, including our long-standing echo cancellation products.  Our initial entrance into the voice quality market was focused on echo cancellation.  Since entering the voice quality market, we have continued to refine our echo cancellation products to meet the needs of the ever-changing telecommunications marketplace. Our more recent product introductions have leveraged off the processing capacity of our newer hardware platforms to offer not only echo cancellation but also new voice quality enhancement features including noise reduction, acoustic echo cancellation, voice level control and enhanced voice intelligibility. We are currently selling our seventh generation echo cancellation product, which began production shipments in the third quarter of fiscal 2004.

 

Exit of Optical Business.  In May 2003, we announced a change to our strategic direction.  We decided to focus all of our assets in continuing to grow our voice quality business, including our echo cancellation and new voice quality features, and as a result we decided to sell our optical communications business.  In July 2003, we completed the primary step in our planned exit of our optical communications business through the sale of a large portion of the assets of the optical communications business to JDS Uniphase Corporation (“JDSU”).  The assets sold consisted primarily of inventory, certain specified optical-related equipment and intellectual property rights, which were sold for an aggregate purchase price of up to approximately $6.5 million in cash, of which (a) approximately $1.4 million was paid to us at closing, (b) $225,000 will be paid to us one year from the closing (subject to reduction in the event any successful indemnification claims are made against us), and (c) up to an additional $4.9 million to be paid to us, which is comprised of up to $900,000 based on the level of inventory consumed by JDSU, and up to $4.0 million based on revenues generated by the optical business acquired by JDSU through June 30, 2005, if any.  Additionally, JDSU has the right to require us to repurchase or reimburse JDSU for any purchased but unused inventory at June 30, 2004, up to $2.0 million, and certain costs incurred by JDSU in connection with the performance of certain warranty obligations relating to optical products that were sold by us prior to the transaction. During the three months ended January 31, 2004, we recognized $563,000 associated with the level of revenue generated by JDSU since the close of the sale.  However, these incremental proceeds were substantially offset by increased loss accruals associated with exiting our international optical operations.  The net effect of these items was reported as a net gain on disposition of discontinued operations in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations.  See Note 4 of Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

We have been aggressively pursuing the disposition, through sale, sublease or abandonment, of the optical assets not sold to JDSU and the facility leases for our Australian and United Kingdom optical research facilities. As of January 31, 2004, we had exited the United Kingdom facility lease.  In February 2004, we exited our Australian facility lease.  Additionally, we had sold substantially all of the optical assets at our two international research operations.  We are still in the process of disposing of the remaining optical assets located in the United States.  As a result of exiting the optical business, our condensed consolidated statements of operations reflect the optical business as a discontinued operation for all periods presented.  See Note 4 of Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

Acquisition History.  Since completing our initial public offering in June 1999, we have completed three acquisitions. At the time we made each of these acquisitions, they were made to bring needed technical skills into our research and development groups to aid in new product introductions.  The most recent, significant acquisition was in July 2000, when we acquired Atmosphere Networks, Inc. The total value of the acquisition was approximately $82 million, which was accounted for using purchase accounting.  In May 2002, we recorded a transitional impairment of the unamortized goodwill balance associated with this acquisition of $36.8 million, which has been reported as a cumulative effect of accounting change.

 

Critical Accounting Policies.  In applying our revenue recognition and allowance for doubtful accounts policies that are outlined in our Form 10-K filed on July 15, 2003, the level of judgment is generally relatively limited, as the vast majority of our revenue has been generated by a handful of relatively long-standing customer relationships.  These customers are some of the largest wire-line and wireless carriers in the United States and our relationships with them are documented in contracts, which clearly highlight potential revenue recognition issues, such as passage of title and risk of loss.  Of the deferred revenue recorded as of January 31, 2004, approximately 70% was associated with deferrals from our largest customers due to contractual terms.  In dealing with the

 

13



 

remaining smaller customers, we closely evaluate the credit risk of these customers.  In those cases where credit risk is deemed to be high, we either mitigate the risk by having the customer post a letter of credit, which we can draw against on a specified date to effectively provide reasonable assurance of collection, or we defer the revenue until customer payment is received.  At January 31, 2004, the total amount of revenue deferred due to our assessment that collection was not reasonably assured as of shipment was approximately $2.1 million.

 

In conjunction with our ongoing analysis of inventory valuation allowances, we are constantly monitoring customer-projected demand on a product by product basis.  Based on these projections we evaluate the levels of allowances required both for inventory on hand, as well as inventory on order from our contract manufacturers.  Although we believe we have been reasonably successful in identifying allowance requirements in a timely manner, sudden changes in buying patterns from that projected by our customers, either due to a shift in product interest and/or a complete pull back from their expected order levels has resulted in some larger than anticipate write-downs being recognized, such as the OC-3 write-down taken in fiscal 2002.  In the case of the OC-3 write-down, the complete pull back from the forecasted demand by the primary customer for this product resulted in a $3.5 million write-down of the OC-3 inventory.  However, in 2003 the addition of a few new customers helped to utilize a large portion of the inventory which had been written down resulting in approximately $2.2 million of previously written down inventory being sold in fiscal 2003 and 2004.

 

Our Customer Base.  Historically the majority of our sales have been to customers in the United States. These customers accounted for approximately 92% of our revenue in the first nine months of fiscal 2004 and 84% and 87% of our revenue in fiscal years 2003 and 2002, respectively. However, sales to some of our customers in the U.S. may result in our products purchased by these customers eventually being deployed internationally, especially in the case of any original equipment manufacturer that distributes overseas. To date, the vast majority of our international sales have been export sales and denominated in U.S. dollars.  We expect that as we begin to ship our newer voice quality products in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004, which are targeted at GSM Networks, international revenue will begin to become a larger percentage of our overall revenue, as these newer products have broader uses internationally than domestically.

 

Our revenue historically has come from a small number of customers. Our five largest customers accounted for approximately 88% of our revenue in the first nine months of fiscal 2004 and 81% and 74% of our revenue in fiscal years 2003 and 2002, respectively. Consequently, the loss of any one of these customers, without an offsetting increase in revenue from existing or new customers, would have a negative and substantial effect in our business.

 

14



 

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the components of the results of operations, as reflected in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, as a percentage of sales.

 

 

 

Three months ended
January 31,

 

Nine months ended
January 31,

 

 

 

2004

 

2003

 

2004

 

2003

 

Revenue

 

100.0

%

100.0

%

100.0

%

100.0

%

Cost of goods sold

 

34.1

 

34.8

 

34.3

 

39.5

 

Gross profit

 

65.9

 

65.2

 

65.7

 

60.5

 

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sales and marketing

 

15.5

 

35.5

 

20.0

 

38.5

 

Research and development

 

12.6

 

24.1

 

16.9

 

29.0

 

General and administrative

 

6.6

 

14.3

 

8.6

 

16.2

 

Restructuring charge

 

 

 

2.2

 

 

Total operating expenses

 

34.7

 

73.9

 

47.7

 

83.7

 

Income (loss) from operations

 

31.2

 

(8.7

)

18.0

 

(23.2

)

Other income, net

 

1.5

 

4.8

 

2.1

 

5.7

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations before benefit from income taxes and cumulative effect of accounting change

 

32.7

 

(3.9

)

20.1

 

(17.5

)

Benefit from income taxes

 

0.6

 

 

0.3

 

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations before cumulative effect of accounting change

 

32.1

 

(3.9

)

19.9

 

(17.5

)

Loss from discontinued operations

 

 

(35.5

)

(20.3

)

(120.0

)

Cumulative effect of accounting change

 

 

 

 

(147.1

)

Net income (loss)

 

32.1

%

(39.4

)%

(0.4

)%

(284.6

)%

 

THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED JANUARY 31, 2004 AND 2003

 

Revenue. 

 

 

 

Three months ended
January 31,

 

Nine months ended
January 31,

 

 

 

2004

 

2003

 

2004

 

2003

 

Revenue

 

$

21,303

 

$

9,147

 

$

46,507

 

$

25,042

 

 

The increase in revenue both in the three and nine months ended January 31, 2004 was primarily due to key deployments at a couple of our newer customers and in part to end of calendar year spending by domestic carriers.  Specifically we have experienced the addition of a few new major domestic carriers to our customer base over the last 18 months, which has led to the growth despite the continuing relatively soft market for telecommunications equipment.  Approximately 80% of revenue for the three- and nine-month periods ended January 31, 2004 has been generated by our Broadband Voice Processor (“BVP”) system, which is the primary system being purchased by our three largest domestic customers in fiscal 2004. This compares with BVP representing less than 40% of our revenues in the corresponding periods in fiscal 2003, as production shipments of BVP did not begin until the second quarter of fiscal 2003.  The major sources of revenue for fiscal 2003 were our older fourth and fifth generation echo canceller systems. In the three months ended January 31, 2004, we also experienced the first limited sales of our BVP Flex, which platform can support our new voice quality features. Virtually all of our revenue for the three- and nine-month periods ended January 31, 2004 has been generated by sales of our echo cancellation products. We expect that in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004 BVP Flex will make up the majority of our product revenue, although BVP will remain a large source of revenue.  In addition, in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004 we expect to recognize revenue from the first shipments of our new international-focused QVP voice quality platform running some of our new voice quality enhancement features.

 

Geographically, revenue in the first nine months of fiscal 2004 remained primarily domestic at 92% of total worldwide revenue compared to 87% for the corresponding period last fiscal year. The relatively small percentage of international sales is largely being driven by the addition of a few major domestic customers, both in the wire-line and wireless markets over the past 18 months.  Although we have also experienced an increase in our international customer base, their order levels have been much lower than that of their new domestic counterparts.  Although we have experienced several consecutive quarters of revenue growth, we believe that carrier spending levels have not fully recovered from the decline in spending first experienced in the latter half of fiscal 2001.  We believe that future near term revenue growth will continue to be driven by a combination of the addition of new domestic and international customers, the gradual recovery of the telecommunications market as a whole and the successful introduction of new

 

15



 

voice quality features to our product offerings.

 

As of January 31, 2004, we had deferred approximately $8.5 million of revenue, largely due to contractual terms primarily with certain domestic customers, which reflects a $7.4 million decline in deferred revenue from that reported at October 31, 2003.  To the extent that we have collected cash associated with deferred revenue transactions, we have reported such amounts as a liability on the face of the balance sheet.  The balance of deferred revenue, for which no cash has been received, is reflected on the balance sheet as a reduction in the corresponding accounts receivable. We expect that substantially all of the deferred revenue as of January 31, 2004 will be recognized in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004. We believe the factors that led to the increase in revenue in the second and third quarters will continue in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004 and will result in revenues exceeding $22 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004.  This is a forward looking statement subject to the risks and uncertainties set forth in “Future Growth and Operating Results Subject to Risk,” especially in “We depend on a limited number of customers for our products, the loss of any one of which could cause our revenue to decrease” and “Our operating results have fluctuated significantly in the past, and we anticipate that they may continue to do so in the future, which could adversely affect our stock price.”

 

Cost of Goods Sold.    

 

 

 

Three months ended
January 31,

 

Nine months ended
January 31,

 

 

 

2004

 

2003

 

2004

 

2003

 

Cost of goods sold

 

$

7,261

 

$

3,187

 

$

15,952

 

$

9,902

 

 

Cost of goods sold consists of direct material costs, personnel costs for test and quality assurance, costs of licensed technology incorporated into our products, provisions for inventory, warranty expenses, installation and other indirect costs.  The increase in cost of goods sold for the three- and nine-month periods ended January 31, 2004 are primarily due to the increase in unit sales of our echo cancellation products.  Also impacting cost of goods sold was increased inventory write-off activity of approximately $200,000 quarter over quarter and $670,000 on a year-to-date basis.  These write-offs were in large part associated with products that were deemed less expensive to write-off than to rework into usable inventory, as well as physical inventory adjustments.  We do not expect write-offs of this magnitude to continue into the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004.  Installation and customer support costs also increased during both the three- and nine-month periods ended January 31, 2004, contributing to an increase in cost of goods sold of approximately $350,000 and $870,000, respectively, due in large part to increased customer requests for post sale support and/or installation. We expect that service costs will continue to be incurred at similar levels for the foreseeable future, especially as we increase our international revenue base. Cost of goods sold did not increase in direct proportion to the increase in revenues in large part due to the sale of previously written-off inventory, which had an original cost of approximately $300,000 and $1.9 million for the three- and nine-month periods ended January 31, 2004, respectively.

 

Gross Profit.    

 

 

 

Three months ended
January 31,

 

Nine months ended
January 31,

 

 

 

2004

 

2003

 

2004

 

2003

 

Gross profit

 

$

14,042

 

$

5,960

 

$

30,555

 

$

15,140

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross margin%

 

65.9

%

65.2

%

65.7

%

60.5

%

 

The increase in gross profit for the three- and nine-month periods ended January 31, 2004 was primarily due to the increased unit shipments of our voice quality products. The primary factor contributing to the increase in gross margin was that our fixed manufacturing costs remained relatively stable despite the increase in revenues, causing fixed manufacturing costs to represent a lower percentage of revenues.  The mix of customers and our product mix towards our newer, higher margin BVP products also favorably impacted our margins in fiscal 2004.  Our margins were also favorably impacted by the sale of previously written-off inventory, which were sold during the periods. These favorable impacts were partially offset by the inventory write-offs and increased installation costs discussed above.

 

Sales and Marketing.    

 

 

 

Three months ended
January 31,

 

Nine months ended
January 31,

 

 

 

2004

 

2003

 

2004

 

2003

 

Sales and marketing

 

$

3,305

 

$

3,245

 

$

9,313

 

$

9,622

 

 

Sales and marketing expenses primarily consist of personnel costs, including commissions and costs associated with customer service, travel, trade shows and outside consulting services.  The minimal increase in sales and marketing expenses for the

 

16



 

three months ended January 31, 2004 was primarily due to increased salaries and related expenses, including commissions, and travel associated with increased sales activity, which resulted in an aggregate increase of approximately $185,000.  We expect travel expense to continue to increase as we focus on international expansion of our business.  The quarterly increase was substantially offset by a shift in customer service department efforts from pre-sales support to installation support, which has resulted in a shifting of costs in fiscal 2004 from sales and marketing to cost of goods sold, which trend we expect to continue for the foreseeable future.  The decline in the nine-month period ended January 31, 2004, reflected vacancies in a couple of key sales and marketing positions for most of the first half of the fiscal 2004, as well as the shifting of customer service focus from pre-sales support to installation, which has resulted in a greater percentage of these costs being assigned to cost of goods sold instead of sales and marketing.  We expect that sales and marketing spending will increase in the coming quarter, as we complete hiring for the remaining key sales and marketing positions, primarily international, to support our new voice quality product offerings.

 

Research and Development.    

 

 

 

Three months ended
January 31,

 

Nine months ended
January 31,

 

 

 

2004

 

2003

 

2004

 

2003

 

Research and development

 

$

2,674

 

$

2,201

 

$

7,842

 

$

7,255

 

 

Research and development expenses primarily consist of personnel costs, and costs associated with contract consultants, equipment and supplies used in the development of our voice quality products.  The increase in research and development spending for both the three- and nine-month periods ended January 31, 2004 is largely due to our recent efforts to bring our new voice quality platforms, the QVP and BVP Flex, to market, as well as the initial work on our next generation of products. This focus resulted in increased spending on payroll and related costs of approximately $255,000 and $1.5 million for the three- and nine-month periods, respectively.  Increased materials and consulting spending also contributed to approximately $435,000 of the three-month period increase. These increases were partially offset by reductions of approximately $305,000 and $810,000 for the three- and nine-month periods, respectively, related to reduced allocations of corporate costs since exiting the optical business.  The increase for the nine-month period was also partially offset by a reduction in software license costs of approximately $250,000 due to an impairment loss realized in fiscal 2003 for a prepaid license that was deemed no longer useful to our product offerings.  We expect research and development expenses to increase in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004 from the third quarter of fiscal 2004 as we continue to focus on new voice quality product introductions, as well as other new product introductions that leverage off our current technical expertise.

 

General and Administrative.    

 

 

 

Three months ended
January 31,

 

Nine months ended
January 31,

 

 

 

2004

 

2003

 

2004

 

2003

 

General and administrative

 

$

1,411

 

$

1,308

 

$

3,987

 

$

4,065

 

 

General and administrative expenses primarily consist of personnel costs for corporate officers, finance and human resources personnel, as well as insurance, legal, accounting and consulting costs. The marginal increase in general and administrative expenses for the three months ended January 31, 2004 was due to increased payroll and related costs of approximately $155,000, which was partially offset by a $47,000 reduction in cheap stock amortization. The decline for the nine months ended January 31, 2004 was primarily due to reductions in recruiting expenses, annual report printing costs and amortization of cheap stock, which accounted for an aggregate reduction of approximately $505,000. These reductions were partially offset by an increase in salaries and related spending, which accounted for an aggregate increase of approximately $455,000 for the nine months ended January 31, 2004.  The increases in salaries and related expenses are due to incremental staffing to deal with increasing Sarbanes-Oxley requirements, as well as increased bonus accruals due to improved operating performance in fiscal 2004.  We expect general and administrative expenses to continue to increase through the fourth quarter.

 

Restructuring Charge    The restructuring charge of $1.0 million, which was recorded in the first quarter of fiscal 2004, reflects the recognition of costs associated with elimination of certain redundant personnel and facilities as a result of exiting our optical business, which costs did not qualify for discontinued operations treatment. These costs included $21,000 of severance and related benefits for the impacted employees, and a loss of $995,000 associated with the abandonment of approximately 11,000 square feet in our Mountain View headquarters.  As of the end of January 2004, all of the severance and related costs had been paid.  The lease loss accrual will be utilized over the remaining term of the lease, which expires in June 2006.  The amount of lease loss utilized in the three- and nine-month periods ended January 31, 2004 totaled approximately $100,000 and $200,000, respectively.  See Note 5 of Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

17



 

Other Income, Net.    

 

 

 

Three months ended
January 31,

 

Nine months ended
January 31,

 

 

 

2004

 

2003

 

2004

 

2003

 

Other income, net

 

$

311

 

$

437

 

$

970

 

$

1,408

 

 

Other income, net consists of interest income on our invested cash and cash equivalent balances, foreign currency activity and a nominal amount of interest expense. The decreases were primarily attributable to lower interest rates reducing earnings on our invested balances.

 

Income Taxes.    Income taxes consist of federal, state and foreign income taxes. The effective tax rate for the three- and nine-month periods ended January 31, 2004 was a provision of 0.6% and 0.3% respectively, as compared to a zero tax rate in the corresponding periods of fiscal 2003. The low provision rate incurred in fiscal 2004 is due to providing alternative minimum taxes on our pretax domestic operating profits. As we had previously recorded a full valuation allowance for all deferred tax assets associated with temporary differences and the tax benefit of net operating loss and tax credit carry forwards, we expect to continue to report minimal income taxes for the foreseeable future related to our international operations and domestic alternative minimum taxes until such time as the valuation allowance against our deferred tax asset is partially or completed released.

 

Gain (Loss) from Discontinued Operations. 

 

 

 

Three months ended
January 31,

 

Nine months ended
January 31,

 

 

 

2004

 

2003

 

2004

 

2003

 

Loss from discontinued operations

 

$

 

$

(3,251

)

$

(2,550

)

$

(30,042

)

Gain (loss) on disposition

 

95

 

 

(6,797

)

 

 

The decrease in the loss from operations of our discontinued optical business was due in large part to reductions in spending realized subsequent to September 2002, when we discontinued our Titanium optical system product development.  As a result, there was a significant decline in spending on salaries and materials.  In addition, fiscal 2004 also benefited from reduced spending on optical subsystems marketing and development after our announcement to exit the optical business in May 2003 and the elimination of substantially all optical costs effective the end of July 2003.

 

The loss on disposition for the nine months ended January 31, 2004 reflects the aggregate loss of $6.9 million realized in the first quarter of fiscal 2004 upon the sale of the optical technology, inventory and certain fixed assets to JDSU, along with other exit costs associated with abandoning that portion of the optical business not acquired by JDSU. This loss was partially offset, in part, by a net gain of $95,000 recognized during the three months ended January 31, 2004.  The net gain recognized in the third quarter was attributable to  $563,000 of incremental sales proceeds associated with the level of revenue generated by JDSU since the close of the sale and a $133,000 tax benefit associated with the year-to-date loss from disposal, which benefit offset the domestic tax provision recognized from continuing operations.  These incremental sales proceeds and the tax benefit were substantially offset by incremental loss accruals associated with closure of our international optical operations.  The net effect of these items was reported as a net gain on disposal of discontinued operations in the condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations.

 

Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change.    The $36.8 million reported in the first nine months of fiscal 2003 represents the transitional impairment loss for previously recorded goodwill, which we recorded in connection with our adoption of SFAS 142 effective May 1, 2002. There was no accounting change in the same period this fiscal year.

 

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

 

We recorded deferred compensation of $1.3 million as of April 30, 1999, as a result of stock options granted in fiscal 1999. We were amortizing the deferred compensation to general and administrative expense over the corresponding vesting period of the stock options. We amortized approximately $47,000 of this deferred compensation to general and administrative expense in each of the first three quarters of fiscal 2003.  This deferred compensation was fully amortized in fiscal 2003.

 

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

 

Since March 1997, we have satisfied the majority of our liquidity requirements through cash flow generated from operations, funds received upon exercise of stock options and the proceeds from our initial and follow-on public offerings in fiscal 2000, when we raised a total of $83.3 million from those public offerings, $27.0 million of which was used to retire mandatorily redeemable preferred

 

18



 

stock and long-term debt.  As of January 31, 2004, we had cash equivalents of $93.0 million and short-term and long-term investments of $27.6 million, as compared to $94.5 million of cash equivalents at April 30, 2003.  In August 2003, we renewed our line of credit to borrow up to $2.0 million for operating purposes, of which no borrowings were outstanding as of January 31, 2004.  This line of credit expires on July 31, 2004.

 

Operating activities provided $15.3 million in cash in the first nine months of fiscal 2004.  The improvement in our cash flow from operations reflects the overall improvement in our operating results due in part to increased product shipments. In addition, our exiting the optical communications business in the first quarter of fiscal 2004 also favorably impacted our operating results in fiscal 2004.  The combination of these two factors, while managing growth in our voice quality related operating expenses, has contributed to our return to quarterly profitability in each of the last two fiscal quarters.  During this same period of time, we have also experienced positive cash flow benefits from the changes in mix of our current assets and liabilities in large part due to favorable revenue linearity and spending control.  Although we would expect to continue to see improvement in cash flow from operations as we expect to be profitable again in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004, we could see some change in the mix of the current assets and liabilities contributing to the positive cash flow.

 

Investing activities used $26.5 million of cash in the first nine months of fiscal 2004, primarily due to modifying our investment startegy to include short-term and long-term investments designed to improve the our overall return on invested funds. Also impacting cash used in investing activities were purchases of equipment and leasehold improvements in our Mountain View offices and additions to other assets, which aggregated $1.6 million.  These out flows of cash were partially offset by collection of a note receivable and related interest totaling $834,000 and net proceeds from exiting the optical business of $1.8 million.  During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004, we expect to collect the final $3.5 million of proceeds from the sale of our echo cancellation software business to TI, as well as a modest level of additional proceeds from the sale of our optical business to JDSU.  These incremental sales proceeds should be more than offset by increased net investment activity in both short-term and long-term investments, as well as purchases of capital equipment, primarily for research and development and customer service purposes.

 

Financing activities generated $9.7 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2004, primarily due to funds received upon stock option exercises and to a lesser extent funding related to semiannual employee stock purchase plan purchases.  The stock option activity in fiscal 2004 was largely due to option exercises by employees impacted by the restructuring of our optical business prior to the cancellation of those options, as well as options exercised by existing employees.  Although we expect to continue to have positive cash flows from financing activities due to employee stock plan activity, the level of cash flow will vary depending on market conditions.

 

We have no material commitments other than obligations under operating leases, particularly our facility leases and normal purchases of inventory, capital equipment and operating expenses, such as materials for research and development and consulting. We currently occupy approximately 50,000 square feet out of approximately 61,000 total square feet of space in the two buildings that form our Mountain View, California headquarters. This facility lease expires in June 2006. In July 2003, we abandoned approximately 11,000 square feet of discrete space in one of the buildings that make up our Mountain View headquarters, which we hope to be able to sublease for the remainder of the lease term. However, given the significant increase in business in the last two quarters, we are currently evaluating the amount of space needs we may have in the future.  Although we believe that the 50,000 square feet of space in Mountain View could satisfy our needs for the next 12 months given current operating levels, continued increases in headcount to support increases in business volume and potential expansion into new product opportunites could create the need for additional space.

 

We also lease a research and development facility in Australia, which contains approximately 6,000 square feet with a lease term that expires in April 2005. As a result of exiting the optical business, we have abandoned this international location and in February exited the lease.  We have found a lessee who has assumed all remaining obligations under the lease for our United Kingdom optical research facility.

 

Our contractual commitments, by year in which they become due, are as follows:

 

 

 

Payments due by period

 

Contractual Obligations (in thousands)

 

Total

 

Less than
1 year

 

1 to 3
years

 

3 to 5
years

 

Over 5
years

 

Operating leases

 

$

4,976

 

$

2,040

 

$

2,890

 

$

45

 

$

 

Purchase commitments

 

8,920

 

8,920

 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

13,896

 

$

10,960

 

$

2,890

 

$

45

 

$

 

 

In addition, as part of the optical sale agreement with JDSU, JDSU has the right to require us to repurchase or reimburse JDSU for any purchased but unused inventory at June 30, 2004, up to $2.0 million, and certain costs incurred by JDSU in connection with the performance of certain warranty obligations relating to optical products that we sold prior to July 16, 2003.

 

19



 

We believe that we will be able to satisfy our cash requirements for at least the next twelve months from our existing cash and short-term investments, and receipt of the balance of the sale proceeds from the sale of our optical business, as described above, and the $3.5 million balance due to us from the sale of our echo software business, as well as funds available under the line of credit that was renewed in August 2003. The ability to fund our operations beyond the next twelve months will be dependent on the overall demand of telecommunications providers for new capital equipment. Should our customers’ capital spending patterns deteriorate from their current levels, we could need to find additional sources of cash during fiscal 2006 or reduce our spending to protect our cash reserves.

 

Future Growth and Operating Results Subject to Risk

 

Our business and the value of our stock are subject to a number of risks, which are set out below. If any of these risks actually occur, our business, financial condition or operating results could be materially adversely affected, which would likely have a corresponding impact on the value of our common stock. These risk factors should be carefully reviewed.

 

WE DEPEND ON A LIMITED NUMBER OF CUSTOMERS FOR OUR PRODUCTS, THE LOSS OF ANY ONE OF WHICH COULD CAUSE OUR REVENUE TO DECREASE.

 

Our revenue historically has come from a small number of customers. Our five largest customers accounted for approximately 88% of our revenue in the first nine months of fiscal 2004 and 81% and 74% of our revenue in fiscal 2003 and 2002, respectively.  A customer may stop buying our products or significantly reduce its orders for our products for a number of reasons, including the acquisition of a customer by another company or a delay in a scheduled product introduction. If this happens, our revenue could be greatly reduced, which would materially and adversely affect our business.

 

Due to continuing difficult economic conditions, many operators in the telecommunications industry have experienced financial difficulties, which have dramatically reduced their capital expenditures and, in some cases, resulted in their filing for bankruptcy or being acquired by other operators. We expect this trend to continue, which may result in our dependence on an even smaller customer base.

 

WE ARE RELIANT SOLELY ON OUR VOICE QUALITY BUSINESS TO GENERATE REVENUE GROWTH AND PROFITABILITY, WHICH COULD LIMIT OUR RATE OF FUTURE REVENUE GROWTH.

 

We expect that, at least for the near-term, our sole business will be the design, development and marketing of voice quality products.  However, the relatively small size of the overall echo cancellation portion of the voice market, which is where we have derived the majority of our revenues to date, could limit the rate of growth of our business.

 

OUR OPERATING RESULTS HAVE FLUCTUATED SIGNIFICANTLY IN THE PAST, AND WE ANTICIPATE THAT THEY MAY CONTINUE TO DO SO IN THE FUTURE, WHICH COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR STOCK PRICE.

 

Our quarterly operating results have fluctuated significantly in the past and may fluctuate in the future as a result of several factors, some of which are outside of our control. If revenue declines in a quarter, as we experienced in the second half of fiscal 2001 and again in the second quarter of fiscal 2002, our operating results will be adversely affected because many of our expenses are relatively fixed. In particular, sales and marketing, research and development and general and administrative expenses do not change significantly with variations in revenue in a quarter. Adverse changes in our operating results could adversely affect our stock price.

 

OUR REVENUE MAY VARY FROM PERIOD TO PERIOD. Factors that could cause our revenue to fluctuate from period to period include, but are not limited to:

 

                  changes in capital spending in the telecommunications industry and larger macroeconomic trends;

 

                  the timing or cancellation of orders from, or shipments to, existing and new customers;

 

                  delays outside of our control in obtaining necessary components from our suppliers;

 

                  delays outside of our control in the installation of products for our customers;

 

                  the timing of new product and service introductions by us, our customers, our partners or our competitors;

 

                  delays in timing of revenue recognition, due to new contractual terms with customers;

 

                  competitive pricing pressures;

 

20



 

                  variations in the mix of products offered by us; and

 

                  variations in our sales or distribution channels.

 

In particular, sales of our echo cancellation products typically come from our major customers ordering large quantities when they deploy a switching center. Consequently, we may get one or more large orders in one quarter from a customer and then no orders in the next quarter. As a result, our revenue may vary significantly from quarter to quarter.

 

Our customers may delay or rescind orders for our existing products in anticipation of the release of our or our competitors’ new products. Further, if our or our competitors’ new products substantially replace the functionality of our existing products, our existing products may become obsolete, which could result in inventory write-downs, and/or we could be forced to sell them at reduced prices or even at a loss.

 

Revenue can vary period to period if planned dates of new product introductions are missed and the product release occurs in a later quarter. As an example of this risk, we had initially planned to begin production shipment of the international version of our OC-3 echo canceller, the STM-1, in the second quarter of calendar 2001. However due to product reprioritization, schedule delays and prolonged customer testing of this new product, we did not ship any units for revenue until fiscal 2003.

 

In addition, the sales cycle for our products is typically lengthy. Before ordering our products, our customers perform significant technical evaluations, which typically last up to 90 days. Once an order is placed, delivery times can vary depending on the product ordered. As a result, revenue forecasted for a specific customer for a particular quarter may not occur in that quarter. Because of the potential large size of our customers’ orders, this would adversely affect our revenue for the quarter.

 

OUR EXPENSES MAY VARY FROM PERIOD TO PERIOD. Many of our expenses do not vary with our revenue. Factors that could cause our expenses to fluctuate from period to period include, but are not limited to:

 

                  the extent of marketing and sales efforts necessary to promote and sell our products;

 

                  the timing and extent of our research and development efforts;

 

                  the availability and cost of key components for our products; and

 

                  the timing of personnel hiring.

 

If we incur such additional expenses in a quarter in which we do not experience increased revenue, our operating results would be adversely affected.

 

IF WE DO NOT SUCCESSFULLY DEVELOP AND INTRODUCE NEW PRODUCTS, OUR PRODUCTS MAY BECOME OBSOLETE.

 

We operate in an industry that experiences rapid technological change, and if we do not successfully develop and introduce new products and our existing products become obsolete due to product introductions by competitors, our revenues will decline. Even if we are successful in developing new products, we may not be able to successfully produce or market our new products in commercial quantities, or increase our overall sales levels. These risks are of particular concern when a new generation product is introduced. Although we believe we will achieve our product introduction dates, there is no guarantee that they will not be delayed.  The current product introductions, which are of greatest significance, are our new voice quality features, which are being offered on our new BVP-Flex and QVP voice quality hardware platforms.  We are currently experiencing numerous customer evaluations of these features around the world and expect that we will begin to see modest revenue levels from these new features beginning in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004.  However, should the customer evaluation process become protracted or the product not meet the customers’ expectations, our realization of any revenues from these new products could be delayed into fiscal 2005 or not materialize at all.

 

We have in the past experienced, and in the future may experience, unforeseen delays in the development of our new products. For example, we originally expected our international version of our fifth generation echo cancellation system, the STM-1, to be available in the second quarter of calendar 2001. However, we did not realize our first revenue shipment of this product until fiscal 2003. Additionally, in fiscal 2002, sales of our fourth generation echo cancellers and our broadband system generated the majority of our echo revenue while sales of our fifth generation, OC-3 echo cancellation system fell short of our expectations due to a sudden decline in projected demand in the third quarter of fiscal 2002 from our primary targeted customer for this product, Qwest.  This unexpected drop in demand for the OC-3 product led to the write down of $3.5 million of excess inventory in the third quarter of fiscal 2002. During fiscal 2003, we began to see acceptance of the OC-3 system by some of our newer customers.  The increased sales

 

21



 

of this product have allowed us to draw down the entire unreserved OC-3 inventory and we have begun selling previously written-down units of this product. However, there can be no assurances that we will be able to sell additional written-down units in the future.

 

We must devote a substantial amount of resources in order to develop and achieve commercial acceptance of our new products; most recently our BVP Flex and QVP hardware platforms and our voice quality features. Our new and/or existing products may not be able to address evolving demands in the telecommunications market in a timely or effective way. Even if they do, customers in these markets may purchase or otherwise implement competing products.

 

WE ANTICIPATE THAT AVERAGE SELLING PRICES FOR OUR PRODUCTS WILL DECLINE IN THE FUTURE, WHICH COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR ABILITY TO BE PROFITABLE.

 

We expect that the price we can charge our customers for our products will decline as new technologies become available, as we expand the distribution of products through OEMs, value-added resellers and distributors internationally and as competitors lower prices either as a result of reduced manufacturing costs or a strategy of cutting margins to achieve or maintain market share. If this occurs, our operating results will be adversely affected. We expect price reductions to be more pronounced, at least in the near term, due to our planned expansion internationally, including the addition of new international distributor relationships. While we intend to reduce our manufacturing costs in an attempt to maintain our margins and to introduce enhanced products with higher selling prices, we may not execute these programs on schedule. In addition, our competitors may drive down prices faster or lower than our planned cost reduction programs. Even if we can reduce our manufacturing costs, many of our operating costs will not decline immediately if revenue decreases due to price competition.

 

In order to respond to increasing competition and our anticipation that average-selling prices will decrease, we are attempting to reduce manufacturing costs of our new and existing products. If we do not reduce manufacturing costs and average selling prices decrease, our operating results will be adversely affected. Manufacturing is currently outsourced to a small number of contract manufacturers. We believe that our current contract manufacturing relationships provide us with competitive manufacturing costs for our products. However, if we or these contract manufacturers terminate any of these relationships, or if we otherwise establish new relationships, we may encounter problems in the transition of manufacturing to another contract manufacturer, which could temporarily increase our manufacturing costs and cause production delays.

 

WE FACE INTENSE COMPETITION, WHICH COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR ABILITY TO MAINTAIN OR INCREASE SALES OF OUR PRODUCTS.

 

The markets for our products are intensely competitive, continually evolving and subject to rapid technological change. We may not be able to compete successfully against current or future competitors, including our customers. Certain of our customers also have the ability to internally produce the equipment that they currently purchase from us. In such cases, we also compete with their internal product development capabilities. We expect that competition will increase in the future. We may not have the financial resources, technical expertise or marketing, manufacturing, distribution and support capabilities to compete successfully.

 

We face competition from two major direct manufacturers of stand-alone echo cancellers, Tellabs and Natural Microsystems (NMS). The other competition in the echo cancellation market comes from voice switch manufacturers. These manufacturers don’t sell echo cancellation products or compete in the stand-alone echo cancellation market, but they integrate echo cancellation functionality within their switches, either as hardware modules or as software running on chips. A more widespread adoption of internal echo cancellation solutions would present an increased competitive threat to us, if the net result was the elimination of demand for our echo cancellation system products. With the downturn in spending in the telecommunications industry, service providers appear to be exploring these alternative sources of echo cancellation more thoroughly, while they wait for more robust capital spending budgets to return. If our customers decide to design these alternative sources of echo cancellation into their future network expansion, it could adversely impact the speed and duration of our echo sales recovery.

 

Most of our competitors and potential competitors have substantially greater name recognition and technical, financial and marketing resources than we do. Such competitors may undertake more extensive marketing campaigns, adopt more aggressive pricing policies and devote substantially more resources to developing new products than we will.

 

WE NOW LICENSE OUR ECHO CANCELLATION SOFTWARE FROM TI, AND IF WE DO NOT RECEIVE THE LEVEL OF SUPPORT WE EXPECT FROM TI, IT COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR ECHO CANCELLATION SYSTEMS BUSINESS.

 

In April 2002, we sold our echo cancellation software technology and future revenue streams from our licenses of technology acquired from Telinnovation to TI, in return for cash and a long-term license of the echo cancellation software. Although the licensing agreement has strong guarantees of support for the software used in our products, if TI were to breach that agreement in some fashion, and not deliver complete and timely support to us, our success in the echo cancellation systems business could be adversely affected.

 

22



 

IF TI LICENSES ITS ECHO CANCELLATION SOFTWARE TO OTHER ECHO CANCELLATION SYSTEMS COMPANIES, THIS COULD INCREASE THE COMPETITIVE PRESSURES ON OUR ECHO CANCELLATION SYSTEMS BUSINESS.

 

Under the terms of the sale agreement of our echo cancellation software to TI, TI is precluded from licensing the software to other echo cancellation systems companies for a period of two years from the date of the sale and to two specified competitors for a period of four years from the date of sale.  If TI were to license its echo cancellation software to other echo cancellation systems companies after two years, this could increase the level of competition and adversely affect our success in our echo cancellation systems business.

 

WE OPERATE IN AN INDUSTRY EXPERIENCING RAPID TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE, WHICH MAY MAKE OUR PRODUCTS OBSOLETE.

 

Our future success will depend on our ability to develop, introduce and market enhancements to our existing products and to introduce new products in a timely manner to meet our customers’ requirements. The markets we target are characterized by:

 

                  rapid technological developments;

 

                  frequent enhancements to existing products and new product introductions;

 

                  changes in end user requirements; and

 

                  evolving industry standards.

 

WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO RESPOND QUICKLY AND EFFECTIVELY TO THESE RAPID CHANGES. The emerging nature of these products and their rapid evolution will require us to continually improve the performance, features and reliability of our products, particularly in response to competitive product offerings. We may not be able to respond quickly and effectively to these developments. The introduction or market acceptance of products incorporating superior technologies or the emergence of alternative technologies and new industry standards could render our existing products, as well as our products currently under development, obsolete and unmarketable. In addition, we may have only a limited amount of time to penetrate certain markets, and we may not be successful in achieving widespread acceptance of our products before competitors offer products and services similar or superior to our products. We may fail to anticipate or respond on a cost-effective and timely basis to technological developments, changes in industry standards or end user requirements. We may also experience significant delays in product development or introduction. In addition, we may fail to release new products or to upgrade or enhance existing products on a timely basis.

 

WE MAY NEED TO MODIFY OUR PRODUCTS AS A RESULT OF CHANGES IN INDUSTRY STANDARDS. The emergence of new industry standards, whether through adoption by official standards committees or widespread use by service providers, could require us to redesign our products. If such standards become widespread, and our products are not in compliance, our current and potential customers may not purchase our products. The rapid development of new standards increases the risk that our competitors could develop and introduce new products or enhancements directed at new industry standards before us.

 

IF INCUMBENT AND EMERGING COMPETITIVE SERVICE PROVIDERS AND THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY AS A WHOLE EXPERIENCE A FURTHER DOWNTURN OR REDUCTION IN GROWTH RATE, THE DEMAND FOR OUR PRODUCTS WILL DECREASE, WHICH WILL ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR BUSINESS.

 

We have experienced, and continue to experience, as have other companies in our sector, a slowdown in infrastructure spending by our customers. This trend of lower capital spending in the telecommunications industry contributed to the decline in our revenues, beginning in the second half of fiscal 2001, and although we have experienced some level of recovery in sales to these customers, sales have not fully recovered to the levels we saw prior to the decline in fiscal 2001.  Our success will depend in large part on development, expansion and/or upgrade of voice and communications networks. We are subject to risks of growth constraints due to our current and planned dependence on domestic and international telecommunications service providers. These potential customers may be constrained for a number of reasons, including their limited capital resources, economic conditions, changes in regulation and consolidation.

 

23



 

SOME OF THE KEY COMPONENTS USED IN OUR PRODUCTS ARE CURRENTLY AVAILABLE ONLY FROM SOLE SOURCES, THE LOSS OF WHICH COULD DELAY PRODUCT SHIPMENTS.

 

We rely on certain vendors as the sole source of certain key components that we use in our products. For example, we rely on TI as the sole source vendor for the digital signal processors used in our echo cancellation and voice enhancement products. We have no guaranteed supply arrangements with our vendors. Any extended interruption in the supply of these components would affect our ability to meet scheduled deliveries of our products to customers. If we are unable to obtain a sufficient supply of these components, we could experience difficulties in obtaining alternative sources or in altering product designs to use alternative components. Resulting delays or reductions in product shipments could damage customer relationships, and we could lose customers and orders. Additionally, because these vendors are the sole source of these components, we are at risk that adverse changes in prices of these components could have negative impacts on the cost of our products or require us to alter product designs to use alternative, less expensive components.

 

SOME SUPPLIERS OF KEY COMPONENTS MAY REDUCE THEIR INVENTORY LEVELS WHICH COULD RESULT IN LONGER LEAD TIMES FOR FUTURE COMPONENT PURCHASES AND ANY DELAYS IN FILLING OUR DEMAND MAY REDUCE OR DELAY OUR EXPECTED PRODUCT SHIPMENTS AND REVENUES.

 

Although we believe there are currently ample supplies of components for our products, it is possible that in the near-term component manufacturers may reduce their inventory levels and require firm orders before they manufacture components. This reduction in stocking levels could lead to extended lead times in the future. If we are unable to procure our planned quantities of materials from all prospective suppliers, and if we cannot use alternative components, we could experience revenue delays or reductions and potential harm to customer relationships. An example of this risk occurred in the third quarter of fiscal 2001 as two vendors supplying us with components used in our OC-3 product did not meet our total demand. As a result, the schedule shipment of our OC-3 product was delayed, which contributed to our revenue shortfall in that quarter.

 

WE MAY EXPERIENCE UNFORESEEN PROBLEMS AS WE DIVERSIFY OUR INTERNATIONAL CUSTOMER BASE, WHICH WOULD IMPAIR OUR ABILITY TO GROW OUR BUSINESS.

 

Historically, we have sold mostly to customers in North America. We are continuing to execute on our plans to expand our international presence through the establishment of new relationships with established international OEMs, value-added resellers and distributors. However, we may still be required to hire additional personnel for the overseas market and incur other unforeseen expenditures. Our planned expansion overseas may not be successful. As we expand our sales focus further into international markets, we will face new and complex issues that we may not have faced before, such as expanded risk to currency fluctuations, longer payment cycles, manufacturing overseas, political or economic instability, potential adverse tax consequences and broadened import/export controls, which will put additional strain on our management personnel. In the past,  the vast majority of our international sales have been denominated in U.S. dollars; however, in the future, we may be forced to denominate a greater amount of international sales in foreign currencies. Additionally, the number of installations we will be responsible for is likely to increase as a result of our continued international expansion. In the past, we have experienced difficulties installing one of our echo cancellation products overseas. In addition, we may not be able to establish more relationships with international OEMs, value-added resellers and distributors. If we do not, our ability to increase sales could be materially impaired.

 

IF WE LOSE THE SERVICES OF ANY OF OUR KEY MANAGEMENT OR KEY TECHNICAL PERSONNEL, OR ARE UNABLE TO RETAIN OR ATTRACT ADDITIONAL TECHNICAL PERSONNEL, OUR ABILITY TO CONDUCT AND EXPAND OUR BUSINESS COULD BE IMPAIRED.

 

We depend heavily on Timothy K. Montgomery, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, and on other key management and technical personnel, for the conduct and development of our business and the development of our products. We have attempted to mitigate some of this risk through some key hires over the past couple of years. However, there is no guarantee that if we lost the services of one or more of these people for any reason, that it would not adversely affect our ability to conduct and expand our business and to develop new products. We believe that our future success will depend in large part upon our continued ability to attract, retain and motivate highly skilled employees. However, we may not be able to do so.

 

OUR ABILITY TO COMPETE SUCCESSFULLY WILL DEPEND, IN PART, ON OUR ABILITY TO PROTECT OUR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS, WHICH WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO PROTECT.

 

We may rely on a combination of patents, trade secrets, copyright and trademark laws, nondisclosure agreements and other contractual provisions and technical measures to protect our intellectual property rights. Nevertheless, such measures may not be adequate to safeguard the technology underlying our products. In addition, employees, consultants and others who participate in the development of our products may breach their agreements with us regarding our intellectual property, and we may not have adequate remedies for any such breach. In addition, we may not be able to effectively protect our intellectual property rights in certain

 

24



 

countries. We may, for a variety of reasons, decide not to file for patent, copyright or trademark protection outside of the United States. We also realize that our trade secrets may become known through other means not currently foreseen by us. Notwithstanding our efforts to protect our intellectual property, our competitors may be able to develop products that are equal or superior to our products without infringing on any of our intellectual property rights.

 

OUR PRODUCTS EMPLOY TECHNOLOGY THAT MAY INFRINGE ON THE PROPRIETARY RIGHTS OF THIRD PARTIES, WHICH MAY EXPOSE US TO LITIGATION.

 

Although we do not believe that our products infringe the proprietary rights of any third parties, third parties may still assert infringement or invalidity claims (or claims for indemnification resulting from infringement claims) against us. Such assertions could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, irrespective of the validity or the successful assertion of such claims, we could incur significant costs in defending against such claims.

 

ACQUISITIONS AND INVESTMENTS MAY ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR BUSINESS.

 

From time to time, we review acquisition and investment prospects that would complement our existing product offerings, augment our market coverage, secure supplies of critical materials or enhance our technological capabilities. Acquisitions or investments could result in a number of financial consequences, including, but not limited to:

 

                  potentially dilutive issuances of equity securities;

 

                  large one-time write-offs;

 

                  reduced cash balances and related interest income;

 

                  higher fixed expenses which require a higher level of revenues to maintain gross margins;

 

                  the incurrence of debt and contingent liabilities; and

 

                  amortization expenses related to other acquisition related intangible assets and impairment of goodwill.

 

Furthermore, acquisitions involve numerous operational risks, including, but not limited to:

 

                  difficulties in the integration of operations, personnel, technologies, products and the information systems of the acquired companies;

 

                  diversion of management’s attention from other business concerns;

 

                  diversion of resources from our existing businesses, products or technologies;

 

                  risks of entering geographic and business markets in which we have no or limited prior experience; and

 

                  potential loss of key employees of acquired organizations.

 

WE MAY NOT REALIZE EXPECTED BENEFITS FROM OUR RESTRUCTURING EFFORTS.

 

Due to our recent decision to exit our optical business we underwent a restructuring of our corporate costs in the first quarter of fiscal 2004. As this restructuring occurred at the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2004, we did not realize any savings of significance in the first quarter of fiscal 2004. Although, we did realize the expected savings of approximately $100,000 in each of the second and third quarters of fiscal 2004, there is no guarantee that we will continue to realize these benefits prospectively or that further restructurings will not be required.

 

Item 3—Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

 

Our exposure to market risk due to changes in the general level of United States interest rates relates primarily to our cash equivalents and short-term and long-term investment portfolios. Our cash, cash equivalents, and short-term and long-term investments are primarily maintained at three major financial institutions in the United States. As of January 31, 2004, we did not hold any derivative instruments. The primary objective of our investment activities is the preservation of principal while maximizing investment income and minimizing risk, and we attempt to achieve this by diversifying our portfolio in a variety of highly rated investment securities that have limited terms to maturity.  We do not hold any instuments for trading purposes.

 

25



 

Investment securities that have maturities of more than three months at the date of purchase but current maturities of less than one year are considered short-term investments.  Investment securities with remaining maturities of one year or more are considered long-term investments. Our short-term and long-term investments consist primarily of U.S. Government securities and corporate bonds, as well as, commercial paper, asset backed securities and certificates of deposit. Short-term and long-term investments are maintained at one major financial institution, are classified as available-for-sale, and are recorded on the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value.

 

The following table presents the hypothetical changes in fair values of our investments as of January 31, 2004 that are sensitive to changes in interest rates (dollars in thousands):

 

 

 

Valuation of Securities Given
an Interest Rate Decrease of
X Basis Points

 

Fair Value as
of January
31,

 

Valuation of Securities Given
an Interest Rate Increase of
X Basis Points

 

 

 

(150 BPS)

 

(100 BPS)

 

(50 BPS)

 

2004

 

50 BPS

 

100 BPS

 

150 BPS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total investments

 

$

27,840

 

$

27,793

 

$

27,702

 

$

27,609

 

$

27,514

 

$

27,418

 

$

27,321

 

 

These instruments are not leveraged. The modeling technique used measures the change in fair values arising from selected potential changes in interest rates. Market changes reflect immediate hypothetical parallel shifts in the yield curve of plus or minus 50 basis points (BPS), 100 BPS, and 150 BPS over the remaining life of the investments, which shifts are representative of the historical movements in the Federal Funds Rate.

 

The following table presents our cash equivalents and short-term and long-term investments subject to interest rate risk and their related weighted average interest rates as of January 31, 2004 (in thousands). Carrying value approximates fair value.

 

 

 

Carrying
Value

 

Average
Interest Rate

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

92,996

 

1.06

%

Short-term investments

 

22,076

 

1.31

 

Long-term investments

 

5,533

 

1.61

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

120,605

 

1.13

%

 

As of April 30, 2003, we did not hold any short-term or long-term investments, and our cash and cash equivalents as of April 30, 2003 were $94.5 million, all of which had maturities of 30 days or less and bore an average interest rate of 1.30%.  Due to the short-term nature of these securities, we do not believe that they presented a material risk to shifts in interest rates.

 

To date, the vast majority of our sales have been denominated in U.S. dollars. As only a small amount of foreign bills are paid in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, our foreign exchange risk is considered immaterial to our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

 

Item 4—Controls and Procedures

 

We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of Timothy Montgomery, our principal executive officer, and William Tamblyn, our principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of January 31, 2004. Based on this evaluation, Messrs. Montgomery and Tamblyn concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide a reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by us in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q was recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and Form 10-Q. It should be noted that a control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by a person’s individual acts, by collusion of two or more people or by management override of the control. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and we cannot assure investors that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

 

In addition, we reviewed our internal controls over financial reporting, and there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended January 31, 2004, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

26



 

Part II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.    LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

 

We are subject to legal claims and proceedings that arise in the normal course of our business. While the outcome of these matters is currently not determinable,  we do not expect that the ultimate costs to resolve these matters will have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

 

ITEM 2.    CHANGES IN SECURITIES, USE OF PROCEEDS AND ISSUER REPURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

 

None.

 

ITEM 3.    DEFAULTS ON SENIOR SECURITIES

 

None.

 

ITEM 4.    SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

 

None

None

 

ITEM 5.    OTHER INFORMATION

 

Consistent with Section 10A(i)(2) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as added by Section 202 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we are responsible for listing the non-audit services approved by our Audit Committee to be performed by PricewaterhouseCoopers, our external auditor. Non-audit services are defined as services other than those provided in connection with an audit or a review of the financial statements of Ditech. The Audit Committee did not approve any new or recurring engagements with PricewaterhouseCoopers for non-audit services during the three months ended January 31, 2004.

 

27



 

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

 

(a)          Exhibits

 

Exhibit

 

Description of document

2.1(1)

 

Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization, dated June 21, 2000, among Ditech Communications Corporation, a Delaware corporation, Oxygen Acquisition Corporation, a Delaware corporation, and Atmosphere Networks, Inc., a Delaware corporation

2.2(2)

 

Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization, dated as of July 25, 2000, by and among Ditech Communications Corporation, a Delaware corporation, Oxygen Acquisition Corporation, a Delaware corporation, and Atmosphere Networks, Inc., a Delaware corporation

2.3(3)

 

Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 16, 2002, by and between Ditech Communications Corporation and Texas Instruments

2.3(4)

 

Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of July 16, 2003, by and between Ditech Communications Corporation and JDS Uniphase Corporation

3.1(5)

 

Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Ditech Communications Corporation

3.2(6)

 

Bylaws of Ditech Communications Corporation, as amended and restated on March 28, 2002

3.3(7)

 

Certificate of Designation of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock

4.1

 

Reference is made to Exhibits 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3

4.2(8)

 

Specimen Stock Certificate

4.3(7)

 

Rights Agreement, dated as of March 26, 2001 among Ditech Communications Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, N.A.

4.4(7)

 

Form of Rights Certificate

31.1

 

Certification by Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2

 

Certification by Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32

 

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 


(1) Incorporated by reference from the exhibit with corresponding number from Ditech’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2000, filed July 31, 2000.

 

(2) Incorporated by reference from the exhibit with corresponding number from Ditech’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed August 8, 2000.

 

(3) Incorporated by reference from the exhibit with corresponding number from Ditech’s Report on Form 8-K, filed April 30, 2002.

 

(4) Incorporated by reference from the exhibit with corresponding number from Ditech’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 30, 2003.

 

(5) Incorporated by reference from the exhibit with corresponding number from Ditech’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2000, filed December 13, 2000.

 

(6) Incorporated by reference from the exhibit with corresponding number from Ditech’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2002, filed July 29, 2002.

 

(7) Incorporated by reference from the exhibit with corresponding title from Ditech’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed March 30, 2001.

 

(8) Incorporated by reference from the exhibit with corresponding description from Ditech’s Registration Statement (No. 333-75063), declared effective on June 9, 1999.

 

(b)  Reports on Form 8-K

 

Ditech filed one report on Form 8-K during the quarter ended January 31, 2004. The report was filed on November 20, 2003 and furnished under Item 12 the financial results for the second quarter of fiscal 2004.

 

28



 

SIGNATURE

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

Ditech Communications Corporation

Date: March 8, 2003

By:

/s/ William J. Tamblyn

 

 

William J. Tamblyn

 

 

Vice President Finance and Chief Financial
Officer (Principal Financial and Chief
Accounting Officer)

 

29



 

EXHIBIT LIST

 

Exhibit

 

Description of document

2.1(1)

 

Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization, dated June 21, 2000, among Ditech Communications Corporation, a Delaware corporation, Oxygen Acquisition Corporation, a Delaware corporation, and Atmosphere Networks, Inc., a Delaware corporation

2.2(2)

 

Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization, dated as of July 25, 2000, by and among Ditech Communications Corporation, a Delaware corporation, Oxygen Acquisition Corporation, a Delaware corporation, and Atmosphere Networks, Inc., a Delaware corporation

2.3(3)

 

Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 16, 2002, by and between Ditech Communications Corporation and Texas Instruments

2.3(4)

 

Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of July 16, 2003, by and between Ditech Communications Corporation and JDS Uniphase Corporation

3.1(5)

 

Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Ditech Communications Corporation

3.2(6)

 

Bylaws of Ditech Communications Corporation, as amended and restated on March 28, 2002

3.3(7)

 

Certificate of Designation of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock

4.1

 

Reference is made to Exhibits 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3

4.2(8)

 

Specimen Stock Certificate

4.3(7)

 

Rights Agreement, dated as of March 26, 2001 among Ditech Communications Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, N.A.

4.4(7)

 

Form of Rights Certificate

31.1

 

Certification by Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2

 

Certification by Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32

 

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 


(1) Incorporated by reference from the exhibit with corresponding number from Ditech’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2000, filed July 31, 2000.

 

(2) Incorporated by reference from the exhibit with corresponding number from Ditech’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed August 8, 2000.

 

(3) Incorporated by reference from the exhibit with corresponding number from Ditech’s Report on Form 8-K, filed April 30, 2002.

 

(4) Incorporated by reference from the exhibit with corresponding number from Ditech’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 30, 2003.

 

(5) Incorporated by reference from the exhibit with corresponding number from Ditech’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2000, filed December 13, 2000.

 

(6) Incorporated by reference from the exhibit with corresponding number from Ditech’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2002, filed July 29, 2002.

 

(7) Incorporated by reference from the exhibit with corresponding title from Ditech’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed March 30, 2001.

 

(8) Incorporated by reference from the exhibit with corresponding description from Ditech’s Registration Statement (No. 333-75063), declared effective on June 9, 1999.

 

30