UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended December 31, 2003
Commission file number 0-20839
DUPONT PHOTOMASKS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in our charter)
Delaware |
|
74-2238819 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
131 Old Settlers Boulevard
Round Rock, Texas 78664
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (512) 310-6500
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o
Indicate by
check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes ý No o
As of February 9, 2004, 18,195,708 shares of common stock, $.01 par value, were outstanding.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2003 (unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
2
DUPONT PHOTOMASKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(Dollars in thousands, except share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
2002 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2003 |
|
||||
Revenue, net |
|
$ |
80,969 |
|
$ |
85,964 |
|
$ |
165,209 |
|
$ |
168,341 |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
71,000 |
|
77,153 |
|
141,734 |
|
152,802 |
|
||||
Selling, general and administrative expense |
|
10,415 |
|
13,375 |
|
20,335 |
|
25,699 |
|
||||
Research and development expense |
|
7,592 |
|
7,566 |
|
15,166 |
|
14,617 |
|
||||
Special charges, net |
|
12,507 |
|
361 |
|
12,507 |
|
1,591 |
|
||||
Operating loss |
|
(20,545 |
) |
(12,491 |
) |
(24,533 |
) |
(26,368 |
) |
||||
Other income (expense), net |
|
236 |
|
(457 |
) |
110 |
|
(1,120 |
) |
||||
Loss before income taxes and minority interest |
|
(20,309 |
) |
(12,948 |
) |
(24,423 |
) |
(27,488 |
) |
||||
Provision for income taxes |
|
1,769 |
|
800 |
|
1,358 |
|
1,450 |
|
||||
Loss before minority interest |
|
(22,078 |
) |
(13,748 |
) |
(25,781 |
) |
(28,938 |
) |
||||
Minority interest in (income) loss of joint ventures |
|
(939 |
) |
521 |
|
(2,731 |
) |
607 |
|
||||
Net loss |
|
$ |
(23,017 |
) |
$ |
(13,227 |
) |
$ |
(28,512 |
) |
$ |
(28,331 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Basic loss per share |
|
$ |
(1.28 |
) |
$ |
(0.73 |
) |
$ |
(1.59 |
) |
$ |
(1.56 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Weighted average shares outstanding |
|
17,993,994 |
|
18,130,468 |
|
17,982,365 |
|
18,119,473 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Diluted loss per share |
|
$ |
(1.28 |
) |
$ |
(0.73 |
) |
$ |
(1.59 |
) |
$ |
(1.56 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Weighted average shares outstanding |
|
17,993,994 |
|
18,130,468 |
|
17,982,365 |
|
18,119,473 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements.
3
DUPONT PHOTOMASKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(Dollars in thousands, except share data)
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
250,355 |
|
$ |
226,783 |
|
|
Accounts receivable, trade, net |
|
54,312 |
|
60,728 |
|
|||
Accounts receivable, related parties |
|
996 |
|
1,704 |
|
|||
Inventories, net |
|
13,434 |
|
11,767 |
|
|||
Deferred income taxes |
|
4,454 |
|
290 |
|
|||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
12,705 |
|
13,788 |
|
|||
Total current assets |
|
336,256 |
|
315,060 |
|
|||
Assets held for sale |
|
5,087 |
|
9,033 |
|
|||
Property and equipment, net |
|
379,582 |
|
361,875 |
|
|||
Accounts receivable, related parties |
|
1,048 |
|
941 |
|
|||
Deferred income taxes |
|
1,603 |
|
1,405 |
|
|||
Other assets, net |
|
46,006 |
|
37,648 |
|
|||
Total assets |
|
|
$ |
769,582 |
|
$ |
725,962 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Accounts payable, trade |
|
$ |
45,935 |
|
$ |
37,279 |
|
|
Accounts payable, related parties |
|
4,553 |
|
5,524 |
|
|||
Income taxes payable |
|
884 |
|
2,224 |
|
|||
Other accrued liabilities |
|
59,559 |
|
59,713 |
|
|||
Short-term borrowings |
|
11,903 |
|
7,630 |
|
|||
Convertible notes |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|||
Total current liabilities |
|
122,834 |
|
212,370 |
|
|||
Long-term borrowings |
|
1,973 |
|
44 |
|
|||
Long-term convertible notes |
|
225,000 |
|
125,000 |
|
|||
Deferred income taxes |
|
4,872 |
|
712 |
|
|||
Other liabilities |
|
10,522 |
|
8,727 |
|
|||
Minority interest in net assets of joint ventures |
|
45,436 |
|
44,829 |
|
|||
Total liabilities |
|
|
410,637 |
|
391,682 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Common stock, $.01 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized; 18,064,964 and 18,130,619 issued and outstanding, respectively |
|
181 |
|
181 |
|
|||
Additional paid-in capital |
|
317,220 |
|
318,378 |
|
|||
Retained earnings |
|
41,544 |
|
13,213 |
|
|||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
2,508 |
|
|||
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
358,945 |
|
334,280 |
|
||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
|
$ |
769,582 |
|
$ |
725,962 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements.
4
DUPONT PHOTOMASKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(Dollars in thousands)
(unaudited)
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
2002 |
|
2003 |
|
||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net loss |
|
$ |
(28,512 |
) |
$ |
(28,331 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
49,443 |
|
46,600 |
|
||
Minority interest in income (loss) of joint ventures |
|
2,731 |
|
(607 |
) |
||
Deferred income taxes |
|
2,048 |
|
202 |
|
||
Special charges, net |
|
12,507 |
|
1,591 |
|
||
Other |
|
(308 |
) |
355 |
|
||
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Accounts receivable, trade, net |
|
2,217 |
|
(10,905 |
) |
||
Accounts receivable, related parties |
|
1,978 |
|
(570 |
) |
||
Inventories, net |
|
(1,143 |
) |
1,544 |
|
||
Other assets, net |
|
24,090 |
|
4,413 |
|
||
Accounts payable, trade |
|
(3,958 |
) |
(4,255 |
) |
||
Accounts payable, related parties |
|
862 |
|
972 |
|
||
Other liabilities |
|
(8,228 |
) |
(9,081 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
53,727 |
|
1,928 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
(30,107 |
) |
(24,680 |
) |
||
Proceeds from sale of warrants and investments |
|
105 |
|
|
|
||
Purchases of investments |
|
(1,983 |
) |
|
|
||
Proceeds from sale of assets |
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
(31,985 |
) |
(22,680 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Proceeds from borrowings |
|
2,006 |
|
401 |
|
||
Payments on borrowings |
|
(2,779 |
) |
(4,918 |
) |
||
Proceeds from issuance of common stock under employee plans |
|
1,499 |
|
1,158 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
726 |
|
(3,359 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
587 |
|
539 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
23,055 |
|
(23,572 |
) |
||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
138,918 |
|
250,355 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
161,973 |
|
$ |
226,783 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash paid (received) for: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Interest |
|
$ |
279 |
|
$ |
1,147 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Taxes, net |
|
$ |
(20,849 |
) |
$ |
404 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements.
5
DUPONT PHOTOMASKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
Retained |
|
Accumulated Other |
|
Total |
|
|||||||
Shares |
|
Amount |
||||||||||||||||
Balance as of June 30, 2002 |
|
17,927,294 |
|
$ |
179 |
|
$ |
314,430 |
|
$ |
155,054 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
469,663 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Issuance of common stock under employee plans |
|
137,670 |
|
2 |
|
2,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,792 |
|
|||||
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(113,510 |
) |
|
|
(113,510 |
) |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Balance as of June 30, 2003 |
|
18,064,964 |
|
181 |
|
317,220 |
|
41,544 |
|
|
|
358,945 |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Issuance of common stock under employee plans |
|
65,655 |
|
|
|
1,158 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,158 |
|
|||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,508 |
|
2,508 |
|
|||||
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,331 |
) |
|
|
(28,331 |
) |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Balance as of December 31, 2003 (unaudited) |
|
18,130,619 |
|
$ |
181 |
|
$ |
318,378 |
|
$ |
13,213 |
|
$ |
2,508 |
|
$ |
334,280 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements.
6
DUPONT PHOTOMASKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(Dollars in thousands, except share data)
(unaudited)
1. Basis of Presentation
The interim consolidated financial statements presented in this report include the accounts of DuPont Photomasks, Inc. and our controlled and wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant inter-company transactions and accounts have been eliminated in consolidation. These interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared by us, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC. All adjustments have been made to the accompanying interim consolidated financial statements which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of our operating results and include all adjustments of a normal recurring nature. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC. It is recommended that these interim consolidated financial statements be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2003. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires the use of estimates and assumptions by management in determining the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosures of contingent liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The results of operations for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations for the entire fiscal year. Certain reclassifications have been made in the prior period consolidated financial statements to conform with the current period presentation.
2. Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost. Property and equipment under capital leases are stated at the present value of future minimum lease payments. Property and equipment are depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets ranging from three to seven years for equipment and 10 to 20 years for buildings. Property and equipment held under capital leases and leasehold improvements are amortized using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the estimated remaining terms of the leases. Accumulated depreciation and amortization was $443,410 as of June 30, 2003 and $465,976 as of December 31, 2003. Assets held for sale relate to the Gresham, Danbury, and Rousset facilities and certain other equipment. We are actively marketing these assets and will sell the assets after appropriate evaluation of all proposals.
3. New Accounting Pronouncements
In January 2003, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 46, or FIN No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (VIE). FIN No. 46 requires that if an entity is the primary beneficiary of a VIE, the assets, liabilities, and results of operations of the VIE should be consolidated on the entitys financial statements. In December 2003, the FASB revised FIN No. 46 which, among other revisions, resulted in the deferral of the effective date of applying the provisions of FIN No. 46 to the first interim or annual period ending after March 15, 2004 for qualifying VIEs. We are currently assessing the impact that FIN No. 46, as revised, may have on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
In January 2003, the SEC issued a final rule requiring enhanced disclosure of material off-balance sheet transactions, arrangements, and other relationships with unconsolidated entities. The rule also requires a tabular disclosure of future payments due under contractual commitments. The disclosure requirements will become effective for our fiscal 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K. We do not expect this pronouncement to have a material impact on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
7
4. Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
Forward foreign exchange contracts are utilized to mitigate the risks associated with currency fluctuations on certain foreign currency balance sheet exposures, and are, therefore, held primarily for purposes other than trading. These foreign exchange contracts do not qualify for hedge accounting under SFAS No. 133 Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended. Unrealized gains and losses resulting from the impact of currency exchange rate movements on forward foreign exchange contracts designated to offset certain non-U.S. dollar denominated assets and liabilities are recognized as other income or expense on the accompanying consolidated income statements in the period in which the exchange rates change. These gains and losses offset the foreign currency exchange gains and losses on the underlying exposures being hedged. An unrealized loss of $28 for the three and six months ended December 31, 2003 is recorded in other expense, net on the accompanying consolidated income statement in relation to our forward exchange contracts outstanding as of December 31, 2003. These instruments may involve elements of credit and market risk in excess of the amounts recognized on the consolidated financial statements. We monitor our positions and the credit quality of counterparties, consisting primarily of major financial institutions, and do not anticipate nonperformance by any counterparty, although nonperformance could occur.
5. Earnings (Loss) Per Share
Basic earnings (loss) per share, or basic EPS, is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted number of common shares outstanding during each period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share, or diluted EPS, is computed by dividing net income (loss) after adjustments for the dilutive effect of our convertible notes (if dilutive), by the weighted average number of common shares and common share equivalents outstanding (if dilutive) during each period. Common share equivalents include stock options and assumed conversion of the convertible notes. The number of common share equivalents outstanding relating to stock options is computed using the treasury stock method and the number of common share equivalents outstanding relating to the convertible notes is computed using the if-converted method.
The reconciliation of the amounts used to calculate the basic EPS and diluted EPS is as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
2002 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2003 |
|
||||
Net loss for the periodbasic |
|
$ |
(23,017 |
) |
$ |
(13,227 |
) |
$ |
(28,512 |
) |
$ |
(28,331 |
) |
Dilutive effect of convertible notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net loss for the perioddiluted |
|
$ |
(23,017 |
) |
$ |
(13,227 |
) |
$ |
(28,512 |
) |
$ |
(28,331 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Weighted average shares outstandingbasic |
|
17,993,994 |
|
18,130,468 |
|
17,982,365 |
|
18,119,473 |
|
||||
Plus: Common share equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Weighted average shares outstandingdilutive |
|
17,993,994 |
|
18,130,468 |
|
17,982,365 |
|
18,119,473 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Basic loss per share |
|
$ |
(1.28 |
) |
$ |
(0.73 |
) |
$ |
(1.59 |
) |
$ |
(1.56 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Diluted loss per share |
|
$ |
(1.28 |
) |
$ |
(0.73 |
) |
$ |
(1.59 |
) |
$ |
(1.56 |
) |
Stock options to acquire 4,392,116 and 4,860,628 shares for the three and six months ended December 31, 2002 and 2003, respectively, were not included in common share equivalents because the effect of including these stock options would have been anti-dilutive. For the three and six months ended December 31, 2002, 941,088 shares were not included in the computations of diluted EPS because the effect of including the shares to be issued upon the conversion of convertible notes would have been anti-dilutive. For the three and six months ended December 31, 2003, 5,824,850 shares were not included in the computations of diluted EPS because the effect of including the shares to be issued upon the conversion of convertible notes would have been anti-dilutive. These options and the convertible notes may become dilutive in the future.
6. Comprehensive Income
We had no items of comprehensive income other than net loss for the three and six months ended December 31, 2002. Our comprehensive income for the three and six months ended December 31, 2003 is comprised of net loss and foreign currency translation adjustments.
8
7. Employee Plans
We apply the intrinsic-value-based method of accounting prescribed by Accounting Principles Board, or APB, Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations including FASB Interpretation No. 44, Accounting for Certain Transactions involving Stock Compensation, an interpretation of APB Opinion No. 25, to account for our stock performance plans. Under this method, compensation expense is recorded on the date of grant only if the current market price of the underlying stock exceeded the exercise price. We also have an Employee Stock Purchase Plan. SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock Based Compensation, established accounting and disclosure requirement alternatives which involve using a different accounting method for expensing the calculated value of option awards. As allowed by SFAS No. 123, we have elected to continue to apply the intrinsic-value-based method of accounting described above, and have adopted only the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123. We use the Black-Scholes model to calculate pro forma expense for disclosure purposes. The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. Option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions including the expected stock price volatility. We use projected volatility rates which are based upon historical volatility rates. Because our employee stock options and Employee Stock Purchase Plan shares have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in managements opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of our employee stock options and Employee Stock Purchase Plan shares.
SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based CompensationTransition and Disclosure, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 123, amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123. The following table illustrates the effect on net loss if the fair-value-based method had been applied to our stock-based employee compensation plans in each period.
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
2002 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2003 |
|
||||
Net loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
As reported |
|
$ |
(23,017 |
) |
$ |
(13,227 |
) |
$ |
(28,512 |
) |
$ |
(28,331 |
) |
Deduct total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under the Black-Scholes valuation method for all awards, net of tax |
|
(4,043 |
) |
(3,507 |
) |
(8,086 |
) |
(7,087 |
) |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Pro forma net loss |
|
$ |
(27,060 |
) |
$ |
(16,734 |
) |
$ |
(36,598 |
) |
$ |
(35,418 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Basic loss per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
As reported |
|
$ |
(1.28 |
) |
$ |
(0.73 |
) |
$ |
(1.59 |
) |
$ |
(1.56 |
) |
Pro forma |
|
$ |
(1.50 |
) |
$ |
(0.92 |
) |
$ |
(2.04 |
) |
$ |
(1.95 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Diluted loss per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
As reported |
|
$ |
(1.28 |
) |
$ |
(0.73 |
) |
$ |
(1.59 |
) |
$ |
(1.56 |
) |
Pro forma |
|
$ |
(1.50 |
) |
$ |
(0.92 |
) |
$ |
(2.04 |
) |
$ |
(1.95 |
) |
9
8. Segment Information
The Company conducts operations worldwide and is managed on a geographic basis, with those geographic segments being North America, Europe and Asia. The North America segment consists only of the U.S., the Europe segment includes France and Germany and the Asia segment includes China, Japan, Korea, Taiwan and Singapore.
|
|
North |
|
Europe |
|
Asia |
|
Eliminations |
|
Total |
|
|||||
Three Months Ended December 31, 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Revenue, net |
|
$ |
38,609 |
|
$ |
15,877 |
|
$ |
26,483 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
80,969 |
|
Transfers between geographic segments |
|
1,690 |
|
227 |
|
5,479 |
|
(7,396 |
) |
|
|
|||||
|
|
$ |
40,299 |
|
$ |
16,104 |
|
$ |
31,962 |
|
$ |
(7,396 |
) |
$ |
80,969 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(16,493 |
) |
$ |
(12,286 |
) |
$ |
5,762 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
(23,017 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Six Months Ended December 31, 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Revenue, net |
|
$ |
77,948 |
|
$ |
29,873 |
|
$ |
57,388 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
165,209 |
|
Transfers between geographic segments |
|
3,331 |
|
270 |
|
10,302 |
|
(13,903 |
) |
|
|
|||||
|
|
$ |
81,279 |
|
$ |
30,143 |
|
$ |
67,690 |
|
$ |
(13,903 |
) |
$ |
165,209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(28,441 |
) |
$ |
(15,044 |
) |
$ |
14,973 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
(28,512 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
June 30, 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Identifiable assets |
|
$ |
308,821 |
|
$ |
113,787 |
|
$ |
346,974 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
769,582 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Three Months Ended December 31, 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Revenue, net |
|
$ |
37,428 |
|
$ |
22,244 |
|
$ |
26,292 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
85,964 |
|
Transfers between geographic segments |
|
6,597 |
|
|
|
6,758 |
|
(13,355 |
) |
|
|
|||||
|
|
$ |
44,025 |
|
$ |
22,244 |
|
$ |
33,050 |
|
$ |
(13,355 |
) |
$ |
85,964 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
1,952 |
|
$ |
(18,705 |
) |
$ |
3,526 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
(13,227 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Six Months Ended December 31, 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Revenue, net |
|
$ |
71,510 |
|
$ |
41,936 |
|
$ |
54,895 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
168,341 |
|
Transfers between geographic segments |
|
12,702 |
|
53 |
|
12,202 |
|
(24,957 |
) |
|
|
|||||
|
|
$ |
84,212 |
|
$ |
41,989 |
|
$ |
67,097 |
|
$ |
(24,957 |
) |
$ |
168,341 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(10,729 |
) |
$ |
(26,529 |
) |
$ |
8,927 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
(28,331 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
December 31, 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Identifiable assets |
|
$ |
240,248 |
|
$ |
130,798 |
|
$ |
354,916 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
725,962 |
|
Products are transferred between geographic areas on a basis intended to approximate the market value of such products.
9. Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes differs from amounts computed by applying the federal statutory rate of 35% to loss before income taxes and minority interest because of: our inability to record deferred tax benefits for net operating losses generated in certain tax jurisdictions; our reduced tax rates in certain Asian jurisdictions; and for other adjustments described below.
During the three months ended December 31, 2002, we recorded a valuation allowance of $1,812 against our net deferred tax asset in Europe (primarily related to net operating loss carryforwards) for the restructuring in Germany. During the three months ended December 31, 2003, our net tax provision included a $950 benefit from the positive resolution of tax audits in multiple jurisdictions and a provision of $1,250 for withholding taxes related to a planned dividend distribution from within our group of foreign subsidiaries. When consummated, this dividend distribution will utilize the majority of our U.S. net operating loss carryforward.
10
10. Special Charges, net
During fiscal 2003, we implemented programs to reduce costs associated with our North America, Europe and Asia segments. The integration and consolidation initiatives in North America and Asia were completed as of March 31, 2003, and the related liabilities were settled as of September 30, 2003. We plan to complete the consolidation initiatives in Europe and settle the related liabilities during fiscal 2004. During the three months ended September 30, 2003, we reduced accrued liabilities for lease termination and asset disposal related costs by $367 as a result of our renegotiation of our lease termination agreement for our Hamburg facility. During the three months ended December 31, 2003, we recorded special charges of $757 which were not previously estimable and related to employee severance for our former employees at our Rousset facility. In addition, we recorded a $553 benefit as a result of terminating a capital lease liability on December 31, 2003 for our Hamburg facility. The charges, benefit and adjustments to the liability have been recorded as Special Charges, net on the accompanying consolidated income statements.
During the three months ended September 30, 2003, we closed our pellicle production facility in Danbury as part of our efforts to reduce costs. In relation to this decision, we recorded special charges of $2,722 for employee severance and asset disposal costs and received proceeds of $1,200 from the sale of certain pellicle technology during the three months ended September 30, 2003. We recorded additional special charges of $234 for employee severance and reduced the employee severance liability by $77 during the three months ended December 31, 2003. The charges and adjustments to the liability, net of sale proceeds, have been recorded as Special Charges, net on the accompanying consolidated income statements. We expect to complete the closure initiatives in Danbury and extinguish the related liabilities during the three months ending March 31, 2004.
A summary of the related accrued liabilities is shown below:
|
|
Employee |
|
Asset |
|
Lease |
|
Total |
|
||||
Remaining liability as of June 30, 2003 |
|
$ |
11,404 |
|
$ |
1,307 |
|
$ |
1,949 |
|
$ |
14,660 |
|
Charges during the three months ended September 30, 2003 |
|
2,057 |
|
740 |
|
|
|
2,797 |
|
||||
Adjustments to the liability during the three months ended September 30, 2003 |
|
|
|
(129 |
) |
(238 |
) |
(367 |
) |
||||
Utilized during the three months ended September 30, 2003 |
|
(4,526 |
) |
(715 |
) |
|
|
(5,241 |
) |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Remaining liability as of September 30, 2003 |
|
8,935 |
|
1,203 |
|
1,711 |
|
11,849 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Charges during the three months ended December 31, 2003 |
|
991 |
|
|
|
|
|
991 |
|
||||
Adjustments to the liability during the three months ended December 31, 2003 |
|
(77 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(77 |
) |
||||
Utilized during the three months ended December 31, 2003 |
|
(3,531 |
) |
(93 |
) |
|
|
(3,624 |
) |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Remaining liability as of December 31, 2003 |
|
$ |
6,318 |
|
$ |
1,110 |
|
$ |
1,711 |
|
$ |
9,139 |
|
11. Commitments and Contingencies
We guarantee a portion of certain equipment leases of the DPI Reticle Technology Center, LLC, or RTC. Our portion of this guarantee was $2,955 as of December 31, 2003.
We, along with Infineon and AMD, have established joint ventures in Dresden, Germany to conduct leading edge photomask research and pilot manufacturing. The ventures consist of the Advanced Mask Technology Center GmbH & Co. KG, or AMTC, and the Maskhouse Building Administration GmbH & Co., or BAC. The AMTC conducts photomask research and pilot manufacturing. The BAC is the owner of a state-of-the-art photomask research and manufacturing facility.
11
We lease approximately 50% of the facility from the BAC for advanced photomask manufacturing and the remainder is leased by the AMTC. Both operating leases are for 10-year terms and commenced July 2003. The BAC executed a term loan agreement for its research and manufacturing facility in December 2002. The term loan had 63,143 Euro ($78,820 as of December 31, 2003) outstanding as of December 31, 2003. Prior to the initial occupancy of the building and initiation of the lease rental payments, we had guaranteed one-third of the BACs indebtedness. Effective July 2003, we were released from the guarantee except if the lenders become liable to return monies received in payment of the indebtedness as a result of any bankruptcy, composition or similar proceedings affecting the BAC.
We are committed to funding a portion of the operating cash requirements of the AMTC under research and development reimbursement and capacity utilization obligations through June 30, 2007. We expect our portion of these operating cash requirements to vary between approximately 22% to 26% through June 30, 2007. Included in these amounts is our guarantee of a portion of the operating lease obligations of the AMTC to the BAC. The estimated guarantee related to the 10-year term of the AMTC lease agreement aggregated $18,800 as of December 31, 2003.
The AMTC has executed a 120,000 Euro revolving credit facility to be used for equipment purchases. The revolving credit facility had 59,000 Euro ($73,649 as of December 31, 2003) outstanding as of December 31, 2003. Each of the partners of the joint venture executed one-third guarantees for up to 32,000 Euro and certain additional costs as defined in the revolving credit facility agreement for as long as any obligation remains outstanding under the revolving credit facility. We will be required to honor our guarantee if the AMTC fails to make timely payments under the revolving credit facility; breaches certain financial covenants; becomes insolvent; or in any other way defaults under the revolving credit facility. We will also be required to honor our guarantee if any of the owners of the AMTC breach certain terms of the joint venture agreement, become insolvent or cease doing business, experience a material adverse change affecting their obligations under the guarantee, fail to pay their respective indebtedness in excess of 50,000 Euro or otherwise experience an event constituting a default under the revolving credit facility.
In May 2002, we entered into an agreement to acquire photomask production equipment from Infineons internal photomask manufacturing operations in Munich, Germany and become Infineons strategic photomask supplier. In consideration for the acquisition of certain photomask production assets and the agreement to supply Infineon with photomasks over a 10 year term, we agreed to pay Infineon $53,500 over a seven-year period ending in March 2009. We also agreed to purchase from Infineon, additional photomask production equipment for approximately $28,100 payable over a five-year period ending in December 2006. We have made purchases of approximately $20,900 in association with this agreement as of December 31, 2003; $6,728 of which is reflected as a liability on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2003. We may elect to satisfy a portion of future amounts payable by issuing shares of our common stock. The amount of which we may satisfy with our common stock approximated $24,500 as of December 31, 2003.
We have established a profit sharing plan with the BindKey employees. Through March 2006, BindKey employees may earn amounts annually based on the annual after-tax earnings of BindKey. Upon the termination of the final year subject to the profit sharing plan, the employees may earn an additional lump-sum amount based on the after-tax earnings of BindKey in the final year. Any amounts earned in relation to the profit sharing plan will be expensed in the period earned.
In March 2002, we sold all of our photoblank manufacturing assets to Schott Lithotec AG, or Schott. We also entered into a supply agreement with Schott for a significant portion of our future purchases of photoblanks.
In July 2003, we signed a multi-year pellicle supply agreement with MLI for a significant portion of our future purchases of pellicles.
As of December 31, 2003, minimum lease payments for noncancelable operating lease obligations are estimated to be $13,300, $11,500, $10,900, $10,800 and $10,500 for annual periods ending December 31, 2004 through 2008, respectively, and $43,200 in the aggregate thereafter.
12
We have various purchase commitments incidental to the normal course of business, including non-refundable deposits to purchase equipment. In the aggregate, such commitments are not at prices in excess of current market.
We are subject to litigation in the normal course of business. We believe the effect, if any, of an unfavorable settlement of such litigation would not have a material adverse impact on our financial position, results of operations, cash flows or liquidity.
Our operations and our ownership of real property are subject to various environmental laws and regulations that govern, among other things, the discharge of pollutants into the air and water and the handling, use, storage, disposal and clean-up of solid and hazardous wastes. Compliance with such laws and regulations requires that we incur capital expenditures and operating costs in connection with our ongoing operations. In addition, such laws and regulations may impose liabilities on owners and operators of businesses and real property without regard to fault and such liabilities may be joint and several with other parties. More stringent environmental laws and regulations may be enacted in the future, which may require us to expend additional amounts on environmental compliance or may require modifications to our operations. Although we are unable to predict the extent of our future liability with respect to any environmental matters, we believe, based upon current information, that environmental liabilities will not be material to our financial position or results of operations. E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, has agreed to indemnify us for any environmental contamination present on our manufacturing sites at June 13, 1996, the date of our initial public offering, or present at any such site due to the generation, use, treatment, storage, release, emission, discharge or disposal of hazardous waste or hazardous materials before such date. The Environmental Protection Agency is reviewing a groundwater contamination issue at our Danbury site under voluntary corrective action. Any such contamination is believed to be offsite or historical, and, if that is the case, any environmental liabilities would be covered by the indemnification agreement with E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company.
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this document. All references to years are to our fiscal years, which end on June 30, unless otherwise noted. Results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year. Statements in this report that relate to future results and events are based on our current expectations. Actual results in future periods may differ materially from those currently expected or desired because of a number of risks and uncertainties. For a discussion of factors affecting our business, see Item 1-Business in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003.
We are a leading global provider of microimaging solutions. We develop and produce photomasks, a key enabling technology used in the manufacture of semiconductor and other microelectronic devices. We also develop and market electronic design automation, or EDA, software. Our current EDA software product enables chip designers to ensure manufacturability earlier in the design cycle and is targeted at the market segment referred to in the industry as Design for Manufacturing, or DFM.
Virtually all of our revenue is derived from the semiconductor industry. Our customers include integrated device manufacturers (companies that design, build and market semiconductor chips), or IDMs, semiconductor foundries (companies that provide sub-contract manufacturing of semiconductor chips) and fabless semiconductor companies (companies that design and market semiconductor chips and sub-contract manufacturing to foundries or IDMs).
The semiconductor industry is cyclical in nature. Based on data published by industry analysts, annual worldwide semiconductor revenue increased by 33% in calendar 2000, decreased by 31% in calendar 2001, and increased by 2% in calendar 2002. Preliminary estimates suggest that revenue increased by 12% in calendar 2003. Most recently, based on reports from industry analysts, and our own discussions with customers, we believe the prospects of revenue growth in calendar 2004 for the semiconductor industry have improved. Most industry observers predict semiconductor revenue in calendar 2004 will increase at least 20%.
Although photomask revenue is not directly linked to semiconductor revenue, we believe that once we get beyond the historically slow calendar first quarter, the improving semiconductor market should translate into an increase of new semiconductor design releases and the continued increase of more leading edge and complex designs, which should increase our revenue.
13
Over the longer term, we expect the photomask industrys revenue growth will be driven by leading edge products supporting design rules of 130-nanometers and below. In order to improve our competitive position in those products, we have co-invested in the AMTC, a joint venture research and development initiative with AMD and Infineon. The AMTC operates in a new, state-of-the-art facility in Dresden, Germany and is focused on developing next generation photomask products and processes supporting 90-nanometer and below design rules. The AMTC operates in the same cleanroom alongside our new advanced manufacturing operations. The co-location of a research and development center and commercial operations is designed to streamline the transfer of new photomask technologies into production volumes. We believe that our investments in the AMTC and our operations in Dresden will accelerate development and commercialization of leading edge photomask technologies and thereby provide us with future opportunities to gain market share.
We have developed and will continue to execute on plans that include various revenue growth initiatives and plans that take actions necessary to more closely match our capacity with our revenue projections. Our plans are designed to increase revenue and reduce our break-even level, thereby returning us to profitability. Since December 2002, we have ceased manufacturing operations in three manufacturing facilities and reduced headcount by over 200 employees, while at the same time staffing our new manufacturing facility in Dresden. We also expect that in the future our investments in Dresden will increase our share of leading edge masks and that our investments in DFM and microimaging capabilities will expand our target markets.
Our primary photomask competitors include Compugraphics, Dai Nippon Printing, Photronics and Toppan Printing. In addition, several IDMs, including IBM, Intel, Micron and Samsung, and some semiconductor foundries such as SMIC and TSMC, maintain their own captive photomask manufacturing operations. The capacity and technical capabilities of these captives, relative to their owners demand for photomasks, affect the size of the photomask market in which we compete.
14
Results of Operations
|
|
Financial Summary |
|
||||||||||
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
2002 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2003 |
|
||||
Revenue, net |
|
$ |
81.0 |
|
$ |
86.0 |
|
$ |
165.2 |
|
$ |
168.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Cost of Goods Sold |
|
71.0 |
|
77.2 |
|
141.7 |
|
152.8 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Gross Profit |
|
$ |
10.0 |
|
$ |
8.8 |
|
$ |
23.5 |
|
$ |
15.5 |
|
Gross Margin |
|
12.3 |
% |
10.3 |
% |
14.2 |
% |
9.2 |
% |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Selling, General and Administrative Expense |
|
$ |
10.4 |
|
$ |
13.4 |
|
$ |
20.3 |
|
$ |
25.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Research and Development Expense |
|
7.6 |
|
7.6 |
|
15.2 |
|
14.6 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Special Charges, net |
|
12.5 |
|
0.4 |
|
12.5 |
|
1.6 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Operating Loss |
|
$ |
(20.5 |
) |
$ |
(12.5 |
) |
$ |
(24.5 |
) |
$ |
(26.4 |
) |
Operating Margin |
|
(25.4 |
)% |
(14.5 |
)% |
(14.8 |
)% |
(15.7 |
)% |
Revenue, net. Revenue, net is comprised primarily of photomask sales to semiconductor manufacturers. Revenue, net increased 6.2% from $81.0 million during the three months ended December 31, 2002 to $86.0 million during the three months ended December 31, 2003. The increase was primarily attributable to an improvement in mix driven by leading edge revenue, defined as 130nm and below design rules.
Leading edge revenue increased approximately 90% over the same three month period last year and represented 25% of our total revenue. Currently, we are qualified at more than a dozen customers at the 130nm node globally. During the quarter we also saw increased qualification activity at leading edge design rules, including the 90nm node. While we do not expect to see a significant increase in demand at the 90nm node during 2004, early qualification is essential to garnering market share in the ramp-up phase at the 90nm node. We continue to actively pursue qualifications at 130nm and 90nm customers around the world and look for new opportunities to grow market share through our capability, quality and service.
During the three months ended December 31, 2003, we set a company record for revenue from phase shift masks, the most complex and difficult mask technology required in the industry. During the three months ended December 31, 2003, revenue from phase shift mask layers alone represented more than 10% of our total revenue. In working with our strategic customers, we believe that multiple lithography strategies will emerge at 65nm design rules and require different phase shift masks. Through our work performed to date, which we believe will be accelerated by the ramp-up of the AMTC, we expect our position to support these advanced mask types will be strong.
Revenue, net increased 1.9% from $165.2 million during the six months ended December 31, 2002 to $168.3 million during the six months ended December 31, 2003. The overall increase was primarily attributable to an improvement in mix driven by revenue from leading edge technology. Revenue from 130nm and below design rules represented 22% of revenue for the six months ended December 31, 2003 as compared with 12% of revenue for the same time period during the prior year.
15
Cost of Goods Sold. Cost of goods sold consists of materials, labor, depreciation, and overhead. Cost of goods sold increased 8.7% from $71.0 million to $77.2 million for the three months ended December 31, 2002 and 2003, respectively. Gross margin decreased from 12.3% for the three months ended December 31, 2002 to 10.3% for the three months ended December 31, 2003. Cost of goods sold increased over the same period last year due to the ramp-up of our advanced production facility in Dresden, costs that had been previously included in our RTC joint venture prior to the modification of the agreement with the RTC partners and expenses related to the consolidation of trailing edge production in Europe. These increases in cost of goods sold were partially offset by benefits from decreased depreciation expense resulting from the impairment of certain long-lived assets during 2003 as well as cost savings from the closure of our pellicle production facility in Danbury in September 2003.
Cost of goods sold increased 7.8% from $141.7 million during the six months ended December 31, 2002 to $152.8 million during the six months ended December 31, 2003. The increase was primarily attributable to the ramp-up of our advanced production facility in Dresden, cost previously included in our RTC joint venture and expenses related to the consolidation of trailing edge production in Europe. These increases in cost of goods sold were partially offset by benefits from decreased depreciation expense resulting from the impairment of certain long-lived assets during 2003.
During the short term, we expect to continue to incur costs associated with the ramp-up of our Dresden facility, partially offset by cost savings from the European consolidation and other employee related costs. During the three months ending March 31, 2004, we expect gross margin to be between 3% and 11%.
Selling, General and Administrative Expense. Selling, general and administrative expense includes salaries of sales and administrative personnel, marketing expense, general and administrative expense and product distribution expense. Selling, general and administrative expense increased 28.4% from $10.4 million for the three months ended December 31, 2002 to $13.4 million for the three months ended December 31, 2003. Selling, general and administrative expense as a percentage of revenue increased from 12.9% for the three months ended December 31, 2002 to 15.6% for the three months ended December 31, 2003. Selling, general and administrative expense increased 26.4% from $20.3 million to $25.7 million for the six months ended December 31, 2002 and 2003, respectively. The increases during the three and six month periods were primarily attributable to personnel related expenses, BindKey software development costs and the ramp-up of our Dresden facility. During the three months ending March 31, 2004, we expect selling, general and administrative expense as a percentage of revenue to be between 14% and 15%.
Research and Development Expense. Research and development expense consists primarily of employee costs, cost of consumed materials, depreciation, engineering related costs and our share of costs of the RTC and AMTC joint ventures. Research and development expense remained flat at $7.6 million comparing the three months ended December 31, 2002 with the three months ended December 31, 2003. As a percentage of revenue it decreased from 9.4% for the three months ended December 31, 2002 to 8.8% for the three months ended December 31, 2003. Research and development cost remained flat as increases in the ramp-up expense of the AMTC, material cost and BindKey software development expense were equally offset by decreases resulting from reduced cost of the RTC due to a modification of the agreement with the RTC partners during December 2002 as well as transitioning labor cost from development to process integration as AMTC becomes the focus of our research and development activity. Our ability to successfully develop and commercialize our technical and manufacturing capabilities will be a key factor in realizing significant revenue and market share at the 90nm and smaller nodes.
Research and development expense decreased 3.6% from $15.2 million to $14.6 million for the six months ended December 31, 2002 and 2003, respectively. The decrease in research and development expense resulted primarily from a $0.7 million subsidy received in Europe during September 2003.
We believe the costs of the AMTC will continue to increase with its ramp-up. During the three months ending March 31, 2004, we expect research and development expense as a percentage of revenue to be between 10% and 11%.
Special Charges, net. During 2003, we implemented programs to reduce costs associated with our Europe operations which resulted in special charges related to employee severance, asset disposal, lease termination and related costs. During the three months ended September 30, 2003, we reduced accrued liabilities for lease termination and asset disposal related costs by $0.4 million as a result of our renegotiation of our lease termination agreement for our Hamburg facility. During the three months ended December 31, 2003, we recorded special charges of $0.8 million which were not previously estimable and related to employee severance for our former employees at our Rousset facility. We also recorded a $0.6 million benefit as a result of terminating a capital lease liability on December 31, 2003 for our Hamburg facility. We plan to complete the consolidation initiatives in Europe and settle the related liabilities during 2004.
16
We closed our pellicle production facility in Danbury during the three months ended September 30, 2003. As a result, we recorded special charges of $2.7 million for employee severance and asset disposal costs and received proceeds of $1.2 million from the sale of certain pellicle technology during the three months ended September 30, 2003. We recorded additional special charges of $0.2 million for employee severance and reduced the employee severance liability by $0.1 million during the three months ended December 31, 2003. We expect to complete the closure initiatives in Danbury and extinguish the related liabilities during the three months ending March 31, 2004.
Other Income (Expense), net. Other income (expense), net includes interest income, interest expense, and foreign currency exchange gains and losses. Other income (expense), net was income of $0.2 million for the three months ended December 31, 2002 and expense of $0.5 million for the three months ended December 31, 2003. The change was due to interest expense on our $125.0 million convertible subordinated notes issued and sold in May 2003 and a net foreign currency exchange loss in the current three month period as compared to a net foreign currency exchange gain during the same three month period during the prior year.
Other income (expense), net for the six months ended December 31, 2002 was income of $0.1 million and expense of $1.1 million for the six months ended December 31, 2003. The change was primarily attributable to interest expense on our $125.0 million convertible subordinated notes issued and sold during May 2003 and, to a lesser extent, a higher net foreign currency exchange loss.
Provision For Income Taxes. Our income taxes are based on the statutory rates in effect in the countries in which we operate. Certain of our operations in Asia are subject to various tax holidays. We recorded a provision for income taxes of $1.8 million and $0.8 million during the three months ended December 31, 2002 and 2003, respectively. The provision for and benefit from income taxes differs from the amounts computed by applying the federal statutory rate of 35% to loss before income taxes and minority interest because of: our inability to record deferred tax benefits for net operating losses generated in certain jurisdictions; reduced tax rates in certain Asian jurisdictions; and for other adjustments described below.
During the three months ended December 31, 2002, we recorded a valuation allowance of $1.8 million against our net deferred tax asset in Europe (primarily related to net operating loss carryforwards) for the restructuring in Germany. During the three months ended December 31, 2003, our net tax provision included a $1.0 million benefit from the positive resolution of tax audits in multiple jurisdictions and a provision of $1.3 million for withholding taxes related to a planned dividend distribution from within our group of foreign subsidiaries. When consummated, this dividend distribution will utilize the majority of our U.S. net operating loss carryforward.
Minority Interest in (Income) Loss of Joint Ventures. Minority interest reflects our partners share of the earnings or losses of our consolidated joint venture operations, which currently include our Shanghai, China and Hsinchu, Taiwan operations. The minority interest impact of our joint ventures was an increase of $0.9 million to our net loss for the three months ended December 31, 2002 and a decrease of $0.5 million to our net loss for the three months ended December 31, 2003. The change during the same three month period was a result of lower revenue and higher production cost driven largely by depreciation expense from added equipment in our Taiwan facility.
For the six months ended December 31, 2002, the minority interest impact of our joint ventures was an increase of $2.7 million to our net loss and a decrease of $0.6 million to our net loss for the six months ended December 31, 2003. Similarly, the change resulted from lower revenue and higher production cost.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our working capital was $213.4 million as of June 30, 2003 and $102.7 million as of December 31, 2003. The decrease in working capital was primarily due to the reclassification of our $100.0 million of convertible subordinated notes from a non-current liability to a current liability combined with cash used for capital expenditures. The $100.0 million notes mature in July 2004.
Cash used in investing activities was $32.0 million and $22.7 million for the six months ended December 31, 2002 and 2003, respectively. Cash used for capital expenditures was $30.1 million and $24.7 million for the six months ended December 31, 2002 and 2003, respectively. We expect capital expenditures for 2004 to be approximately $60.0 million to $65.0 million. Capital expenditures have been and will be used primarily to advance our technical capability. Additionally, in the future we may pursue acquisitions of businesses, products and technologies, or enter into joint venture arrangements, that could complement or expand our business. Any material acquisition or joint venture could result in a decrease to our working capital depending on the amount, timing and nature of the consideration to be paid.
Cash provided by financing activities was $0.7 million for the six months ended December 31, 2002 and cash used in financing activities was $3.4 million for the six months ended December 31, 2003. The cash used in financing activities during the six months ended
17
December 31, 2003 was primarily the result of payments on borrowings in China.
Our ongoing cash requirements will be for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, research and development and the repayment of convertible notes and other indebtedness. We expect to repay our $100.0 million convertible notes due in July 2004 from our existing cash balances. Management believes that cash on hand and any cash provided by operations will be sufficient to meet our cash requirements for at least the next 12 months. However, based on our current operating plans, we may seek external financing from time to time to fund our capital expenditures, working capital requirements and other growth initiatives. Sources of external financing could include issuances of equity, convertible debt and short-term or long-term borrowings. There can be no assurance that external sources of financing will be available if our capital requirements exceed cash flows from operations or that we will be able to obtain any additional financing required to fund our capital needs on reasonable terms, or at all.
Our consolidated cash and cash equivalents balances as of December 31, 2003, was $226.8 million, of which $11.5 million was attributable to minority shareholders in our consolidated joint ventures. As of March 31, 2004, we expect our consolidated cash and cash equivalents balances will be approximately $200.0 million.
The following summarizes our contractual cash obligations as of December 31, 2003 (in millions):
|
|
Payments Due for the Periods ending Dectember 31, |
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
Total |
|
Year |
|
Two Years |
|
Two Years |
|
Beyond |
|
|||||
Short-term and long-term borrowings |
|
$ |
7.2 |
|
$ |
7.2 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Convertible notes |
|
225.0 |
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
125.0 |
|
|
|
|||||
Capital lease obligations |
|
0.4 |
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Operating leases (BAC amounts estimated) |
|
100.1 |
|
13.3 |
|
22.3 |
|
21.3 |
|
43.2 |
|
|||||
Other long-term obligations (AMTC amounts estimated) |
|
57.9 |
|
13.7 |
|
32.5 |
|
8.6 |
|
3.1 |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total contractual cash obligations |
|
$ |
390.6 |
|
$ |
134.6 |
|
$ |
54.8 |
|
$ |
154.9 |
|
$ |
46.3 |
|
We lease approximately 50% of the Dresden facility from the BAC for advanced photomask manufacturing. This operating lease is for a 10-year term and commenced July 2003. In addition, we are committed to funding a portion of the operating cash requirements of the AMTC under research and development reimbursement and capacity utilization obligations through June 30, 2007. We expect our portion of these operating cash requirements to vary between approximately 22% to 26% through June 30, 2007.
The following summarizes our commercial commitments as of December 31, 2003 (in millions):
|
|
Amounts of Commitment Expiration by Periods Ending December 31, |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
Total |
|
Year |
|
Two Years |
|
Two Years |
|
Beyond |
|
||||||
Guarantees (AMTC amounts estimated) |
|
$ |
39.4 |
|
$ |
27.5 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
3.0 |
|
$ |
8.9 |
|
|
Other commercial commitments |
|
60.7 |
|
21.1 |
|
26.1 |
|
10.0 |
|
3.5 |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Total commercial commitments |
|
$ |
100.1 |
|
$ |
48.6 |
|
$ |
26.1 |
|
$ |
13.0 |
|
$ |
12.4 |
|
|
Guarantees include our proportionate share of the AMTC lease payments to the BAC in excess of our commitment to fund the operating cash requirements of the AMTC through June 30, 2007. We estimate this guarantee to be $10.7 million as of December 31, 2003. We have also executed a one-third guarantee for up to 32.0 million Euro of the AMTCs 120.0 million Euro revolving credit facility. The revolving credit facility had 59.0 million Euro ($73.6 million as of December 31, 2003) outstanding as of December 31, 2003. Guarantees also include our portion of certain equipment leases of the RTC. Our portion of this guarantee was approximately $3.0 million as of December 31, 2003.
18
In May 2002, we entered into an agreement to acquire photomask production equipment from Infineons internal photomask manufacturing operations in Munich, Germany and become Infineons strategic photomask supplier. In consideration for the acquisition of certain photomask production assets and the agreement to supply Infineon with photomasks over a 10-year term, we agreed to pay Infineon $53.5 million over a seven-year period ending in March 2009. We also agreed to purchase from Infineon additional photomask production equipment for approximately $28.1 million payable over a five-year period ending in December 2006. We have made purchases of approximately $20.9 million in association with this agreement as of December 31, 2003; $6.7 million of which is reflected as a liability on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2003. We may elect to satisfy a portion of future amounts payable by issuing shares of our common stock. The amount of which we may satisfy with our common stock approximated $24.5 million as of December 31, 2003.
In addition to the commitments in the tables above, the following commitments and contingencies exist:
We have established a profit sharing plan with the BindKey employees. Through March 2006, BindKey employees may earn amounts annually based on the annual after-tax earnings of BindKey. Upon the termination of the final year subject to the profit sharing plan, the employees may earn an additional lump-sum amount based on the after-tax earnings of BindKey in the final year. Any amounts earned in relation to the profit sharing plan will be expensed in the period earned.
In March 2002, we sold all of our photoblank manufacturing assets to Schott. We also entered into a supply agreement with Schott for a significant portion of our future purchases of photoblanks.
In July 2003, we signed a multi-year pellicle supply agreement with MLI for a significant portion of our future purchases of pellicles.
We also have various purchase commitments incidental to the normal course of business, including non-refundable deposits to purchase equipment. In the aggregate, such commitments are not at prices in excess of current market.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our critical accounting policies are as follows:
Revenue recognition
Product revenue is recognized when both title and risk of loss transfers to the customer, provided that no significant obligations remain. Discounts and rebates are recorded as a reduction of revenue during the period they are earned by the customer. Provision is made for an estimate of product returns based on historical experience and is recorded as a reduction in revenue. Customarily, our shipping terms are FOB or FCA shipping point; however, our final terms depend upon the negotiations with our customers.
Estimates, specifically sales return allowances, the allowance for doubtful accounts receivable, allowance for excess and obsolete inventory and depreciation expense
The preparation of consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reported period.
We must make estimates of potential future product returns related to current period product revenue. We analyze historical returns, current economic trends, and changes in customer demand and acceptance of our products when evaluating the adequacy of the sales returns and other allowances. Significant management judgments and estimates must be made and used in connection with establishing the sales returns and other allowances in any accounting period. Material differences may result in the amount and timing of our revenue for any period if management made different judgments or utilized different estimates.
Similarly, we must make estimates of the collectability of our accounts receivable. We consider trends of historical bad debts, customer concentrations, customer credit-worthiness, current economic trends and changes in our customer payment terms when evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts. If circumstances change or if our original estimates are otherwise incorrect, we may have to reduce our estimates of the recoverability of amounts due us by a material amount.
19
We maintain inventory reserves for estimated obsolescence or unmarketable inventory equal to the difference between the cost of inventory and estimated market value based on assumptions of future demands and market conditions. If actual market conditions are materially less favorable than those projected by management, or if our estimates of market value are later determined to have been materially incorrect, additional inventory writedowns may be required.
Property and equipment are depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets ranging from three to seven years for equipment and 10 to 20 years for buildings. Property and equipment held under capital leases and leasehold improvements are amortized using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the estimated remaining terms of the leases.
Valuation of identifiable intangibles and other long-lived assets
We assess the impairment of identifiable intangibles subject to amortization and other long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors considered important which could trigger an impairment review include the following:
Significant underperformance relative to expected historical or projected future operating results;
Significant changes in the manner of our use of the acquired assets or the strategy for our overall business;
Significant negative industry or economic trends; and
Our market capitalization relative to net book value.
When it is determined that the carrying value of intangibles subject to amortization and other long-lived assets may not be recoverable based upon the existence of one or more of the above indicators of impairment, the measurement of any impairment is determined and the carrying value is reduced as appropriate.
Accounting for income taxes
We are required to consider our income taxes in each of the tax jurisdictions in which we operate in computing our effective income tax rate. This process involves estimating our current tax exposure together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items for tax and financial reporting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included on our consolidated balance sheets. Further, the actual annual amount of taxable income in each tax jurisdiction may differ from the estimates we use to compute the effective tax rate during our first, second and third quarters. Additionally, we evaluate the recoverability of the deferred tax assets from future taxable income and establish valuation allowances if recovery is not more likely than not. Our income tax provision on the consolidated income statements are impacted by changes in the valuation allowance. This process is complex and involves significant management judgment in determining our provision for income taxes, deferred tax assets and liabilities and any valuation allowance recorded against our net deferred tax assets.
Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements presented herein include the accounts of DuPont Photomasks, Inc. and our controlled and wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant inter-company transactions and accounts are eliminated in consolidation. Entities that are not controlled but on which we can exercise significant influence are recorded under the equity method of accounting.
Other Matters
In January 2003, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 46, or FIN No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (VIE). FIN No. 46 requires that if an entity is the primary beneficiary of a VIE, the assets, liabilities, and results of operations of the VIE should be consolidated on the entitys financial statements. In December 2003, the FASB revised FIN No. 46 which, among other revisions, resulted in the deferral of the effective date of applying the provisions of FIN No. 46 to the first interim or annual period ending after March 15, 2004 for qualifying VIEs. We are currently assessing the impact that FIN No. 46, as revised, may have on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
20
In January 2003, the SEC issued a final rule requiring enhanced disclosure of material off-balance sheet transactions, arrangements, and other relationships with unconsolidated entities. The rule also requires a tabular disclosure of future payments due under contractual commitments. The disclosure requirements will become effective for our fiscal 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K. We do not expect this pronouncement to have a material impact on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
Forward Looking Statements
This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Such forward-looking statements are generally accompanied by words such as intend, may, plan, expect, believe, should, would, could, anticipate or other words that convey uncertainty of future events or outcomes. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, such forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by the forward looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties include, without limitation, the following:
A renewed downturn in the semiconductor industry could lead to a decrease in the demand for our photomask products;
The semiconductor industry is highly cyclical and has been subject to significant economic downturns at various times;
Our financial results may vary significantly from quarter to quarter or we may fail to meet investors expectations, which could negatively impact the price of our stock;
Lack of visibility and short turn around time of orders may impact our ability to respond to a changing business environment;
We may not obtain sufficient capital to fund our needs;
Our operating results could be adversely affected by under-utilized production capacity;
A significant portion of our revenue is derived from Asia and Europe, and therefore, our business, financial condition and results of operations are to a significant degree subject to economic, political and social events in these regions;
Macroeconomic conditions may have effects on the semiconductor industry;
We may be unable to enhance our existing products and develop and manufacture new products and upgrades with improved capabilities to satisfy anticipated demand for more technologically advanced photomasks;
Rapid technological change could render our products obsolete or our manufacturing processes ineffective;
We may not remain competitive and increased competition could seriously harm our business;
We may be unable to successfully develop or market our EDA software;
E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company has influence on all stockholder votes;
Our success depends, in part, upon key managerial, engineering and technical personnel as well as our ability to continue to attract and retain additional personnel and integrate new personnel into key positions; and
Other risks indicated in our other filings with the SEC, including but not limited to those factors which are fully discussed under the caption Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on September 10, 2003.
These risks and uncertainties are beyond our control and, in many cases, we cannot predict the risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those indicated by the forward-looking statements.
The forward-looking statements are made as of the release date hereof, and we disclaim any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements or to update the reasons why the actual results could differ materially from those projected in the
21
forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
22
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Market Risk
Market risks relating to our operations result primarily from changes in interest rates and changes in foreign currency exchange rates. As of December 31, 2003, we had outstanding $100.0 million in non-interest bearing convertible subordinated notes due in July 2004, $125.0 million in 1.25% convertible subordinated notes due in May 2008 and approximately $7.5 million in interest bearing borrowings. As a result, changes in the interest rate market would change the estimated fair value of our convertible notes and other interest bearing borrowings. We believe that a 10% change in interest rates would not have a material effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Foreign currency exposures are primarily due to non-North America operations which are subject to certain risks inherent in conducting business abroad, including price and currency exchange controls, fluctuation in the relative value of currencies and restrictive governmental actions. Changes in the relative value of currencies occur from time to time and may, in certain instances, have a material effect on our consolidated financial condition and results of operations. Any exchange rate fluctuations can affect our margins since we may have imbalances between some foreign currency denominated revenue and expenses. Our consolidated financial statements reflect remeasurement and translation of items denominated in non-U.S. currencies to U.S. dollars, our reporting currency. Exchange gains or losses are included in comprehensive income in the period in which they occur. We monitor our exchange rate exposure and attempt to reduce such exposure by hedging. We have entered into forward contracts in currencies of the countries in which we conduct business in order to reduce such exposure. The net unrealized loss related to our forward exchange contracts outstanding as of December 31, 2003 was not significant. An unrealized gain of $2.5 million as of December 31, 2003, is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income on the accompanying interim unaudited consolidated balance sheet and statement of stockholders equity in relation to foreign currency translation adjustments. These instruments may involve elements of credit and market risk in excess of the amounts recognized on the interim unaudited consolidated financial statements. We believe that a 10% change in exchange rates would not have a material effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. We monitor our positions and the credit quality of counterparties, consisting primarily of major financial institutions, and do not anticipate nonperformance by any counterparty, although nonperformance could occur. There can be no assurance that such forward contracts or any other hedging activity will be available or adequate to eliminate, or even mitigate, the impact of our exchange rate exposure. There can be no assurance that such risks will not have a material adverse impact on our liquidity, financial condition and results of operations in the future.
Financial Risk Management
Our international revenue is subject to inherent risks, including fluctuations in local economies; difficulties in staffing and managing foreign operations; greater difficulty in accounts receivable collection; costs and risks of localizing products for foreign countries; unexpected changes in regulatory requirements, tariffs and other trade barriers; difficulties in the repatriation of earnings; and burdens of complying with a wide variety of foreign laws. Some of our sales outside of North America are denominated in local currencies, and accordingly, we are subject to the risks associated with fluctuations in currency rates. In general, increases in the value of the dollar against foreign currencies decrease the U.S. dollar value of foreign sales requiring us either to increase our price in the local currency, which could render our product prices noncompetitive, or to suffer reduced revenue and gross margins as measured in U.S. dollars. Our foreign currency hedging program is not designed to hedge the margin risks associated with foreign exchange rate changes. Our hedging is comprised of foreign currency forward exchange contracts utilized to mitigate the risks associated with foreign currency fluctuations on certain balance sheet exposures. However, the hedging program will not eliminate all of our foreign exchange risks.
The marketplace for our products dictates that we maintain inventories of raw materials. Therefore, inventory obsolescence is a risk for us due to frequent engineering changes, shifting customer demand, the emergence of new industry standards and rapid technological advances including the introduction by our competitors or us of products embodying new technology. While we maintain valuation allowances for excess and obsolete inventory and we continue to monitor the adequacy of such valuation allowances, there can be no assurance that such valuation allowances will be sufficient.
As of December 31, 2003, we had outstanding foreign currency denominated short-term borrowings totaling approximately $7.2 million. As of December 31, 2003, we did not have any relationships with any unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities, which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. Accordingly, we are not exposed to any financing, liquidity, market or credit risk that could arise if we were engaged in such relationships.
23
As of December 31, 2003 we had $100.0 million of convertible subordinated notes outstanding due in July 2004. The notes have no stated interest, are convertible at any time into shares of our common stock at a conversion price of $106.26 per share, are unconditionally guaranteed by E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company and are not callable by us. In the event of a fundamental change in our company, each holder of notes will have the right to require us to redeem, in cash, any or all of such holders notes at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount to be redeemed. If a fundamental change were to occur, we cannot assure you that we will have sufficient funds to pay the redemption price for all the notes tendered by the holders, although E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company would be required to pay the redemption price under its guarantee. In that case, our failure to redeem tendered notes would constitute an event of default under the indenture for the notes, and may constitute a default under the terms of other indebtedness that we may enter into from time to time.
In addition, we had $125.0 million of convertible subordinated notes outstanding as of December 31, 2003 that are due in May 2008. The notes accrue interest at an annual rate of 1.25% and are convertible at any time into shares of our common stock at a conversion price of $25.595 per share. Interest on the notes is payable semi-annually on May 15 and November 15 of each year beginning November 15, 2003. If a change of control occurs, each holder of notes will have the right to require us to redeem, in cash, any or all of such holders notes at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount to be redeemed. If a change of control were to occur, we cannot assure you that we will have sufficient funds to pay the redemption price for all the notes tendered by the holders. In that case, our failure to redeem tendered notes would constitute an event of default under the indenture for the notes, and may constitute a default under the terms of other indebtedness that we may enter into from time to time. In connection with the issuance of the notes, we entered into a Registration Rights Agreement and filed a shelf registration statement covering resales of the notes and the common stock issuable upon conversion of the notes. If we fail to comply with certain of our obligations under the Registration Rights Agreement, additional interest will accrue on the affected notes at an annual rate of 0.5%.
Our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer, based on their evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d -15(e) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934) as of the end of the period covered by this report on Form 10-Q of DuPont Photomasks, Inc., have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective. There were no changes in internal control over financial reporting or in other factors during our most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
We are not currently involved in any material legal proceedings.
The Companys Annual Meeting of Stockholders was held November 4, 2003 (the Annual Meeting). At the Annual Meeting, (i) the Company elected Class I directors to the Board of Directors to serve until our 2006 annual meeting or until their successors are elected and qualified, subject to their death, resignation or removal, and (ii) the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Companys independent public accountants for the year ending June 30, 2004 was ratified. Votes cast at the Annual Meeting are as follows:
(i) Election of Class I Directors
|
|
FOR |
|
WITHHELD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. James Prendergast |
|
14,178,938 |
|
2,396,220 |
|
William T. Siegle |
|
14,676,150 |
|
1,899,008 |
|
(ii) Ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
FOR |
|
AGAINST |
|
ABSTAIN |
|
NON-VOTE |
|
14,631,107 |
|
1,858,271 |
|
85,780 |
|
0 |
|
24
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(A) |
|
Exhibits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1.1 |
Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, as amended and restated on April 3, 1996. (A) |
|
|
3.1.2 |
Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of the Company. (B) |
|
|
3.2 |
Bylaws, as amended on October 26, 1999. (B) |
|
|
3.2.1 |
Amendments to the Bylaws Of DuPont Photomasks, Inc. as approved by the Board Of Directors on June 23, 2003. (E) |
|
|
4.1 |
Specimen Certificate for Common Stock. (A) |
|
|
4.2 |
Form of Indenture, between DuPont Photomasks, Inc. and Chase Bank of Texas, N.A., as trustee, including the form of Convertible Subordinated Notes due July 24, 2004 attached as Exhibit A thereto. (F) |
|
|
4.3 |
Indenture, between DuPont Photomasks, Inc. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, as trustee, including Form of 1.25% Convertible Subordinated Notes due 2008 (144A Global Note and Reg S. Global Note). (C) |
|
|
4.4 |
Rights Agreement, dated as of January 30, 2001, between DuPont Photomasks, Inc. and EquiServe Trust Company, N.A., as Rights Agent, together with the following exhibits thereto: Exhibit A-Form of Certificate of Designation of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock of DuPont Photomasks, Inc.; Exhibit B-Form of Right Certificate; Exhibit C-Summary of Rights to Purchase Shares of Preferred Stock of DuPont Photomasks, Inc. (D) |
|
|
4.5 |
Amendment No. 1 to Rights Agreement, between DuPont Photomasks, Inc. and EquiServe Trust Company, N.A., as Rights Agent, dated as of April 29, 2003. (C) |
|
|
4.6 |
Registration Rights Agreement among DuPont Photomasks, Inc., Credit Suisse First Boston LLC and Lehman Brothers Inc. dated as of May 5, 2003. (C) |
|
|
31.1 |
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
31.2 |
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
32 |
Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
Letter |
|
Definition |
(A) |
|
Registration Statement on Form S-1, Registration No. 333-33869. |
(B) |
|
Form 8-A12 G/A on June 23, 2000. |
(C) |
|
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003. |
(D) |
|
Form 8-A12B on January 30, 2001. |
(E) |
|
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003. |
(F) |
|
Amendment No. 2 to Form S-3 filed on July 19, 2000. |
(B) |
|
Reports on Form 8-K |
Our report on Form 8-K, dated October 22, 2003, reporting our announcement on October 22, 2003 of our financial results for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2003.
Our report on Form 8-K/A, dated October 22, 2003, reporting our corrected announcement on October 22, 2003 of our financial results for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2003.
25
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
Dupont Photomasks, Inc. |
||
|
|
||
|
By: |
/s/ SATISH RISHI |
|
|
|
Satish Rishi |
|
Date: February 12, 2004 |
|
Executive Vice PresidentFinance and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
26