Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One) |
|
|
|
ý |
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15d OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003 |
|
|
|
o |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 0-21705
SANCHEZ
COMPUTER ASSOCIATES, INC.
(Exact Name of
Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Pennsylvania |
|
23-2161560 |
|
|
|
40
Valley Stream Parkway, Malvern PA |
|
19355 |
|
|
|
www.sanchez.com |
|
|
Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code: (610) 296-8877
N/A
Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o No ý
As of October 31, 2003, there were 26,921,551 outstanding shares of the issuers Common Stock, no par value.
SANCHEZ
COMPUTER ASSOCIATES, INC.
INDEX TO FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2003
2
Sanchez Computer Associates, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
|
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
||
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
27,994 |
|
$ |
32,717 |
|
Accounts receivables, less allowances ($325 and $979) |
|
14,233 |
|
12,993 |
|
||
Contracts in process |
|
3,742 |
|
4,851 |
|
||
Income tax refund receivable |
|
2,380 |
|
1,619 |
|
||
Deferred income taxes |
|
2,661 |
|
2,661 |
|
||
Prepaid and other current assets |
|
2,617 |
|
2,812 |
|
||
Deferred expenses |
|
10,723 |
|
8,343 |
|
||
Total current assets |
|
64,350 |
|
65,996 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Property and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Equipment |
|
18,544 |
|
16,532 |
|
||
Furniture and fixtures |
|
2,663 |
|
2,674 |
|
||
Leasehold improvements |
|
3,169 |
|
3,148 |
|
||
|
|
24,376 |
|
22,354 |
|
||
Accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
(19,514 |
) |
(16,826 |
) |
||
Net property and equipment |
|
4,862 |
|
5,528 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Goodwill |
|
22,142 |
|
23,896 |
|
||
Deferred expenses |
|
5,183 |
|
11,496 |
|
||
Amortizable intangible assets, net |
|
3,494 |
|
8,454 |
|
||
Deferred income taxes |
|
2,895 |
|
2,895 |
|
||
Other non-current assets |
|
2,536 |
|
2,832 |
|
||
Total assets |
|
$ |
105,462 |
|
$ |
121,097 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
4,726 |
|
$ |
3,771 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
7,007 |
|
9,617 |
|
||
Deferred revenue |
|
24,867 |
|
22,804 |
|
||
Total current liabilities |
|
36,600 |
|
36,192 |
|
||
Deferred revenue |
|
6,990 |
|
18,150 |
|
||
Minority interest |
|
190 |
|
209 |
|
||
Total liabilities |
|
43,780 |
|
54,551 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Common stock stated value of $.01 per share, 75,000 shares authorized, 26,918 and 26,689 shares issued and outstanding |
|
269 |
|
267 |
|
||
Additional paid-in capital |
|
49,371 |
|
48,794 |
|
||
Retained earnings |
|
9,094 |
|
18,575 |
|
||
Accumulated comprehensive income (loss) |
|
2,948 |
|
(1,090 |
) |
||
Total shareholders equity |
|
61,682 |
|
66,546 |
|
||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
105,462 |
|
$ |
121,097 |
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements
3
Sanchez Computer Associates, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of
Operations
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)
|
|
Three
Months Ended |
|
Nine
Months Ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
||||
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Products |
|
$ |
7,112 |
|
$ |
4,132 |
|
$ |
19,073 |
|
$ |
10,813 |
|
Services |
|
7,264 |
|
10,232 |
|
20,560 |
|
25,102 |
|
||||
Processing |
|
4,557 |
|
4,743 |
|
13,837 |
|
13,835 |
|
||||
Software maintenance and other |
|
5,015 |
|
4,546 |
|
15,295 |
|
12,689 |
|
||||
Customer reimbursements |
|
1,211 |
|
1,562 |
|
3,439 |
|
4,434 |
|
||||
Total revenues |
|
25,159 |
|
25,215 |
|
72,204 |
|
66,873 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Product development |
|
5,666 |
|
4,483 |
|
16,120 |
|
11,377 |
|
||||
Product support |
|
1,629 |
|
1,652 |
|
4,903 |
|
4,417 |
|
||||
Services |
|
5,955 |
|
5,541 |
|
16,678 |
|
14,695 |
|
||||
Processing |
|
4,358 |
|
4,154 |
|
12,099 |
|
12,302 |
|
||||
Sales and marketing |
|
3,123 |
|
2,933 |
|
9,948 |
|
9,295 |
|
||||
General, administrative and other |
|
3,155 |
|
2,696 |
|
8,840 |
|
8,234 |
|
||||
Customer reimbursement expense |
|
1,211 |
|
1,562 |
|
3,439 |
|
4,434 |
|
||||
Impairment charge |
|
9,500 |
|
|
|
9,500 |
|
|
|
||||
Restructuring charge |
|
|
|
752 |
|
316 |
|
752 |
|
||||
Total operating expenses |
|
34,597 |
|
23,773 |
|
81,843 |
|
65,506 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Earnings (loss) from operations |
|
(9,438 |
) |
1,442 |
|
(9,639 |
) |
1,367 |
|
||||
Interest income, net |
|
67 |
|
147 |
|
219 |
|
889 |
|
||||
Gain on investment |
|
|
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
||||
Foreign exchange income (loss) |
|
12 |
|
134 |
|
(194 |
) |
134 |
|
||||
Earnings (loss) before income taxes |
|
(9,359 |
) |
1,723 |
|
(9,458 |
) |
2,390 |
|
||||
Income tax provision |
|
74 |
|
409 |
|
23 |
|
629 |
|
||||
Net earnings (loss) |
|
$ |
(9,433 |
) |
$ |
1,314 |
|
$ |
(9,481 |
) |
$ |
1,761 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share |
|
$ |
(0.35 |
) |
$ |
0.05 |
|
$ |
(0.35 |
) |
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Weighted-average common shares outstanding |
|
26,893 |
|
26,503 |
|
26,816 |
|
26,202 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Weighted-average common and dilutive shares outstanding |
|
26,893 |
|
26,817 |
|
26,816 |
|
26,482 |
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements
4
Sanchez Computer Associates, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
|
|
Nine
Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
||
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net earnings (loss) |
|
$ |
(9,481 |
) |
$ |
1,761 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings (loss) to cash provided (used) by operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
3,633 |
|
3,709 |
|
||
Impairment charge |
|
9,500 |
|
|
|
||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Accounts receivable |
|
(1,059 |
) |
3,123 |
|
||
Contracts in process |
|
1,112 |
|
(3,130 |
) |
||
Income tax refund receivable/payable |
|
(1,003 |
) |
131 |
|
||
Prepaid and other current assets |
|
822 |
|
(1,824 |
) |
||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
(1,775 |
) |
(3,653 |
) |
||
Provision for doubtful accounts receivable |
|
|
|
1,100 |
|
||
Deferred revenue |
|
(8,970 |
) |
10,799 |
|
||
Deferred expenses |
|
3,910 |
|
(2,600 |
) |
||
Other |
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
||
Net cash provided (used) by operating activities |
|
(3,361 |
) |
9,416 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Investments |
|
(75 |
) |
(500 |
) |
||
Capital expenditures |
|
(2,022 |
) |
(1,334 |
) |
||
Acquisition of Spectra, net of cash acquired of $1,849 and including transaction costs of $514 |
|
|
|
(25,671 |
) |
||
Net cash used by investing activities |
|
(2,097 |
) |
(27,505 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Exercise of stock options |
|
180 |
|
37 |
|
||
Proceeds from the issuance of shares under the employee stock purchase plan |
|
345 |
|
577 |
|
||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
525 |
|
614 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
(4,933 |
) |
(17,475 |
) |
||
Effect of foreign exchange on cash |
|
210 |
|
(77 |
) |
||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
32,717 |
|
40,955 |
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
27,994 |
|
$ |
23,403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Supplemental cash flow information |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Interest paid |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Income taxes paid |
|
$ |
810 |
|
$ |
716 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements
5
Sanchez Computer Associates, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
(A.) Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements of Sanchez Computer Associates, Inc. (Sanchez or the Company) include the accounts of all of the Companys majority owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform with the current period presentation. In the opinion of management, the consolidated financial statements reflect all normal and recurring adjustments which are necessary for a fair presentation of the Companys financial position, results of operations, and cash flows as of the dates and for the periods presented. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information. Consequently, these statements do not include all of the disclosures normally required by generally accepted accounting principles for annual financial statements nor those normally made in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K. Accordingly, reference should be made to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional disclosures, including a summary of the Companys critical accounting policies, which have not changed since our latest Annual Report on Form 10-K as of December 31, 2002. The consolidated results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003 are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year.
(B.) Geographic Segments
Revenue derived from customers in various geographic regions is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Nine months ended |
||||||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
||||||||
|
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
||||
U.S. and Caribbean |
|
$ |
12,930 |
|
$ |
14,975 |
|
$ |
36,451 |
|
$ |
42,686 |
Canada |
|
3,913 |
|
4,398 |
|
12,179 |
|
6,154 |
||||
Europe |
|
4,546 |
|
4,673 |
|
14,127 |
|
16,457 |
||||
Other |
|
3,770 |
|
1,169 |
|
9,447 |
|
1,576 |
||||
Total |
|
$ |
25,159 |
|
$ |
25,215 |
|
$ |
72,204 |
|
$ |
66,873 |
(C.) Business Segments
Previously, our segments included Sanchezs software licensing business, the Sanchez Data Systems, Inc. (SDSI) outsourcing business and the Wealth Management Division, which was created following the Companys acquisition of Spectra Securities Software, Inc. (Spectra) in July 2002. Beginning with the first quarter of 2003, the Company organized into divisions and initiated segment reporting based on those divisions. Sanchezs new divisional segments are Banking Solutions, Wealth Management, Outsourcing, and Global Services. In addition, a Corporate Support group was created to support these operating divisions. The Company evaluates the performance of its segments and allocates resources to them accordingly. Customer reimbursement revenue and expenses are the same amount and, therefore, have no net effect on operating earnings. Customer reimbursement revenues and expenses are not allocated to the individual operating divisions. The Company combines assets, liabilities and shareholders equity into one consolidated balance sheet and does not measure the performance of its divisions based upon balance sheet accounts. It is not practical at this time to restate segment data for prior periods to conform to the Companys new segment reporting. We will continue to also present segment information under the previous format until comparative information about segments under the new format is available. The tables below summarize the Companys segments as they are currently measured as well as how they were previously reported in 2002.
6
The table below summarizes information about the new business segments (in thousands):
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
||
|
|
September 30, 2003 |
|
September 30, 2003 |
|
||
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Banking Solutions |
|
$ |
10,312 |
|
$ |
27,895 |
|
Wealth Management |
|
2,367 |
|
8,026 |
|
||
Outsourcing |
|
5,652 |
|
17,457 |
|
||
Global Services |
|
5,617 |
|
15,387 |
|
||
Total segment revenue |
|
23,948 |
|
68,765 |
|
||
Customer reimbursements |
|
1,211 |
|
3,439 |
|
||
Total revenues |
|
$ |
25,159 |
|
$ |
72,204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Earnings (loss) from operations |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Banking Solutions |
|
$ |
2,671 |
|
$ |
5,801 |
|
Wealth Management |
|
(10,831 |
) |
(12,083 |
) |
||
Outsourcing |
|
(944 |
) |
(1,564 |
) |
||
Global Services |
|
(334 |
) |
(1,793 |
) |
||
Total loss from operations |
|
$ |
(9,438 |
) |
$ |
(9,639 |
) |
The table below summarizes information about the business segments in the previous format (in thousands):
|
|
Three
months ended |
|
Nine
months ended |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|||||||
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Sanchez |
|
$ |
13,499 |
|
$ |
8,606 |
|
$ |
36,815 |
|
$ |
26,934 |
|
|||
SDSI |
|
9,289 |
|
12,690 |
|
27,354 |
|
36,020 |
|
|||||||
Wealth Management |
|
2,371 |
|
3,919 |
|
8,035 |
|
3,919 |
|
|||||||
Total Revenues |
|
$ |
25,159 |
|
$ |
25,215 |
|
$ |
72,204 |
|
$ |
66,873 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Earnings (loss) from operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Sanchez |
|
$ |
473 |
|
$ |
(833 |
) |
$ |
94 |
|
$ |
(1,553 |
) |
|||
SDSI |
|
(83 |
) |
2,097 |
|
875 |
|
2,742 |
|
|||||||
Wealth Management |
|
(9,828 |
) |
178 |
|
(10,608 |
) |
178 |
|
|||||||
Total earnings (loss) from operations |
|
$ |
(9,438 |
) |
$ |
1,442 |
|
$ |
(9,639 |
) |
$ |
1,367 |
|
|||
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
|
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Sanchez |
|
$ |
91,128 |
|
$ |
97,438 |
|
SDSI |
|
26,116 |
|
41,000 |
|
||
Wealth Management |
|
26,994 |
|
38,655 |
|
||
Eliminations |
|
(38,776 |
) |
(55,996 |
) |
||
Total assets |
|
$ |
105,462 |
|
$ |
121,097 |
|
7
(D.) Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings (loss) per share has been calculated as net earnings (loss) divided by weighted-average common shares outstanding, while diluted earnings (loss) per share has been computed as net earnings (loss) divided by weighted-average common and diluted shares outstanding, which includes the dilutive effect of stock options. The following table provides a reconciliation of weighted-average common shares outstanding to weighted-average common and diluted shares outstanding (in thousands):
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
||||
|
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
Weighted-average shares outstanding |
|
26,893 |
|
26,503 |
|
26,816 |
|
26,202 |
|
Dilutive effect of options |
|
|
|
314 |
|
|
|
280 |
|
Total weighted average common and diluted shares outstanding |
|
26,893 |
|
26,817 |
|
26,816 |
|
26,482 |
|
At September 30, 2003, total potentially dilutive common stock equivalents include options to purchase 6,664,668 shares of common stock. As of September 30, 2002, total potentially dilutive common stock equivalents included options to purchase 6,130,824 shares of common stock. All potentially dilutive common stock equivalents were excluded from the calculations of net loss per share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003, as their effect is anti-dilutive as a result of the net loss incurred for the periods.
(E.) Stock-Based Compensation
In December 2002, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based CompensationTransition and Disclosure, was issued. SFAS No. 148 amended SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, to provide alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair-value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. In addition, SFAS No. 148 amended the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123 related to the disclosure about the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method used on reported results. The disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 148 are applicable to interim or annual periods that end after December 15, 2002, and, as such, have been incorporated below. SFAS No. 123, as amended by SFAS No. 148, permits companies to (i) recognize as expense the fair value of stock-based awards, or (ii) continue to apply the provisions of Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting For Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations, and provide pro forma net earnings (loss) and earnings (loss) per share disclosures for employee stock option grants as if the fair-value based method defined in SFAS No. 123 had been applied. The Company continues to apply the provisions of APB Opinion No. 25 and provide the pro forma disclosures in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123 and SFAS No. 148 to its stock option plans. Had compensation cost for the Companys stock option plans been determined based upon the fair value of the options at the date of grant, as prescribed under SFAS No. 123, the Companys net earnings (loss) and basic and diluted net earnings (loss) per share would have been adjusted to the following pro forma amounts (in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|||||||
Net earnings (loss) |
|
As reported |
|
$ |
(9,433 |
) |
$ |
1,314 |
|
$ |
(9,481 |
) |
$ |
1,761 |
|
|||
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under the fair-value based methods for all awards, net of tax |
|
|
|
(682 |
) |
(1,145 |
) |
(2,249 |
) |
(3,342 |
) |
|||||||
|
|
Pro forma |
|
$ |
(10,115 |
) |
$ |
169 |
|
$ |
(11,730 |
) |
$ |
(1,581 |
) |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share |
|
As reported |
|
$ |
(0.35 |
) |
$ |
0.05 |
|
$ |
(0.35 |
) |
$ |
0.07 |
|
|||
|
|
Pro forma |
|
$ |
(0.38 |
) |
$ |
0.01 |
|
$ |
(0.44 |
) |
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|||
8
(F.) Goodwill and Intangible Assets
In accordance with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangibles, the Company no longer amortizes goodwill but instead performs an annual test to determine if the Companys goodwill is impaired. During the third fiscal quarter of 2003, the Company performed its annual assessment of goodwill associated with its Wealth Management Reporting Unit (Reporting Unit). The Company engaged an external valuation specialist to assist in this assessment. The market approach was used to measure the fair value of the Reporting Unit. This approach derives market multiples from recent transactions or offerings of companies with similar operations as the Reporting Unit. Market multiples of publicly traded companies that were deemed comparable to the Company were also used in the analysis. Based upon this analysis, the Company determined that the carrying value of the Reporting Unit exceeded its fair value. The identification of an impairment necessitated the preparation of a SFAS No. 142, Level 2 analysis to quantify the amount of the goodwill impairment. During this analysis, the Company determined that there also could be an impairment to certain amortizable intangible assets associated with the Reporting Unit, primarily the customer relationships and acquired technology. As a result, the Company performed an impairment analysis of the long-lived assets in accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. As a result of this analysis, the Company determined that the carrying value of the Reporting Units long-lived assets exceeded the undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by such assets over their remaining useful life. Accordingly, the Company recorded an impairment charge of approximately $5.5 million to write down the long-lived assets to their fair value. The fair value of the long-lived assets was primarily determined using the income approach. The income approach measures the value of an asset by calculating the present value of its future economic benefits. These benefits can include revenues, cost savings, tax deductions, and proceeds from its disposition. Value indications are developed by discounting expected cash flows to their present value at a rate of return that incorporates the risk-free rate for the use of funds, trends within the industry, and risks associated with particular investments of similar type and quality as of the valuation date. The Company then determined the fair value of the goodwill associated with the Reporting Unit in accordance with SFAS No. 142, resulting in an impairment charge related to goodwill of approximately $4.0 million. The total impairment to goodwill and certain amortizable intangible assets of the Reporting Unit for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 was $9.5 million and appears on the Consolidated Statements of Operations as Impairment charge.
Based on the carrying value of amortizable intangible assets as of September 30, 2003, remaining amortization is expected to be approximately $166,000 for the remainder of fiscal 2003, $589,000 in fiscal 2004, $515,000 in fiscal 2005 and $515,000 in fiscal 2006 and $1.7 million in years 2007 through 2012.
(G.) Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, which addresses the consolidation by business enterprises of variable interest entities as defined in the Interpretation. Interpretation No. 46 requires that its provisions are effective immediately for all arrangements entered into after January 31, 2003. For those arrangements entered into prior to January 31, 2003, the Interpretation 46 provisions are required to be adopted at the beginning of the first interim or annual period beginning after December 15, 2003. The Company does not expect that the provisions of Interpretation No. 46 will have a material impact on the Companys results of operations or financial position.
(H.) Related Party Transactions
On July 3, 2002, in connection with the acquisition of Spectra, the Company loaned Mr. John McLeod, President of the Companys Wealth Management Division, approximately $314,000. This loan is secured by a pledge of 100,000 shares of Sanchez common stock. The loan contains an interest rate as prescribed by the Canadian Customs and Revenue Agency (Base Rate). This rate is adjusted quarterly to the extent such Base Rate changes. At September 30, 2003 the Base Rate was 4%. The loan has a term of three years commencing July 3, 2002 with six semi-annual payments, the first of which was due on January 3, 2003. In July 2003, Mr. McLeod made the second of his six semi-annual payments.
During 2001, the Company loaned $130,000 to Mr. Todd Pittman, the Companys Chief Financial Officer, for the purchase of Company stock. The three-year loan, for which Mr. Pittman is personally liable, is secured by the Company stock purchased by Mr. Pittman, and bears interest at a rate of 4.63% per annum. Mr. Pittman had a balance, including interest, of approximately $118,000 as of September 30, 2003.
9
In accordance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the Company has adopted a policy not to grant any new loans or materially modify or extend any existing loans to officers or directors of the Company and the audit committee must review and approve any related party transactions involving officers or directors.
(I.) Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income (loss) consists of net earnings (loss), adjusted for other increases and decreases affecting shareholders equity that are excluded from the determination of net earnings (loss). The calculation of comprehensive income (loss) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Three
months ended |
|
Nine
months ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
||||
Net earnings (loss) |
|
$ |
(9,433 |
) |
$ |
1,314 |
|
$ |
(9,481 |
) |
$ |
1,761 |
|
Cumulative translation adjustments |
|
(197 |
) |
(1,095 |
) |
4,089 |
|
(1,095 |
) |
||||
Unrealized loss on marketable securities |
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
||||
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
(9,653 |
) |
$ |
219 |
|
$ |
(5,415 |
) |
$ |
666 |
|
(J.) Subsequent Events
On October 17, 2003, the Company announced that it has begun implementing plans to reduce the Companys cost base by approximately $8.0 million. The cost reductions are targeted for completion by the end of the year. The Company expects to achieve these cost savings primarily through a reduction in its workforce and broad-based salary reductions. The Company expects to take a restructuring charge of approximately $1.3 million in the fourth quarter of 2003 related to such actions.
10
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Overview
Sanchez Computer Associates, Inc. (Sanchez or the Company) is publicly traded on the Nasdaq Stock Exchange under the symbol SCAI. The Company is an international provider in developing and marketing scalable and integrated software and services that provide banking, customer integration, brokerage, wealth management and outsourcing solutions used by approximately 400 financial institutions in 22 countries. Sanchezs corporate headquarters is located in Malvern, Pennsylvania. The Companys outsourcing data and operations service center is located in Seven Fields, Pennsylvania. Sanchez also maintains offices in Toronto, Canada; San Ramon, California; Sydney, Australia; New York, New York; Amsterdam, the Netherlands; and Warsaw, Poland.
Divisional Organization
Beginning with the first quarter of 2003, Sanchez organized into divisions and initiated new segment reporting based on those divisions. Sanchezs divisional segments are Banking Solutions, Wealth Management, Outsourcing and Global Services. In addition, a Corporate Support group was created to support these operating divisions. Each division has individual profit and loss responsibilities and is responsible for advancing the Companys objective to be the industrys leading value innovator. Whether through software products, methodologies, services, custom software enhancements or solutions consulting engagements, each division is tasked to significantly lower clients ongoing operations and technology costs, reduce their technology risk, and improve their enterprise customer management. The divisions were created to provide the innovation and focus necessary to assist clients in achieving their business plans. The Company believes this additional focus for all of its products and services will help the Company pursue new and previously under-served revenue opportunities. In addition, it is believed the divisions will allow the Company to respond more quickly and with greater flexibility to a wider variety of client requirements and needs. The Company markets internationally and prospects for sales opportunities with institutions in need of one or more of the following solutions: a bank line of business migration; a retail banking legacy system replacement; customer enterprise integration; bank outsourcing; or a wealth management solution.
Sanchez Banking Solutions Division
The Banking Solutions Division develops and supports the Sanchez suite of integrated banking software products. The division licenses these banking products to financial institutions to run in-house or alternatively, on an outsourced basis. The Banking Solutions Division derives its revenues from licenses of software products, product enhancements and software maintenance fees, as well as from other miscellaneous fees.
Sanchez Wealth Management Division
The Wealth Management Division is responsible for the development, maintenance and services associated with Sanchez WealthwareTM. Wealthware is an integrated wealth management software solution that helps financial institutions manage investor assets online. Wealthware aggregates customer data to provide a single, customer-centric perspective and provides the desktop tools to analyze portfolios, make informed investment decisions and execute transactions. The Wealth Management Division derives its revenues primarily from license, service and maintenance fees on its Wealth Management product.
Sanchez Outsourcing Division
Sanchez also uses its integrated banking platform as the basis for offering a complete outsourced direct banking solution called Sanchez e-PROFILE®. The Sanchez Outsourcing Division administers the Sanchez e-PROFILE solution by offering an integrated end-to-end operations and technology platform. This outsourced platform enables institutions to offer comprehensive on-line financial services to their customers. This solution integrates products and services from what the Company believes are the industrys best-in-class vendors, including Sanchez products, and manages them under a single, outsourced operating umbrella. The solution also provides the Company with a distribution channel for the suite of Sanchez products, related technologies and services. At September 30, 2003, there were nine clients processing accounts at the Companys data and operations service center. The Outsourcing Divisions revenues are primarily generated from processing and services fees.
11
Sanchez Global Services Division
The Global Services Division provides project management, training, system implementation, solution integration, custom interfaces to third-party or in-house legacy applications, data conversion, integrated testing, custom software, custom output (reports, statements, notices), custom component application, localization, and version upgrade services to our banking customers. While supporting the other operating units, the Global Services Division also markets its services directly to existing and prospective clients.
Revenue Generation
The Companys divisions generate revenue by assessing fees on software products, services, processing and maintenance. Fees assessed on software products include software license and product enhancement fees. Typically, fees for software license contracts are paid in stages upon the completion of defined deliverables or certain dates. For licenses sold for in-house solutions, i.e., operated by the institutions, the Company recognizes revenue from fees under either the percentage-of-completion contract accounting method, or where applicable, when the requirements of AICPA Statement of Position 97-2 Software Revenue Recognition are met. Financial institutions selecting an outsourced banking solution can purchase product licenses upfront, or in lieu of upfront license fees, institutions can opt to spread the license and accompanying maintenance fees on a per account/per month basis over the life of the processing contract. Assessment of per account/per month fees begins after the client goes live, i.e., client begins processing its customers accounts on the outsourced platform with the solution. Software product fees and implementation fees generated from outsourced solutions, along with their associated costs, are largely deferred during the implementation phase of an outsourced project in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101, Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements (SAB 101). Once an outsourced solution goes live, the deferred product and services revenue and costs are recognized over the expected life of the processing arrangement. Other service revenue is generally recognized when the services are performed or on the percentage-of-completion method, depending on the contract terms and accounting for the other elements of the arrangement. Processing fees consist primarily of monthly and account-based fees for servicing, as well as transaction fees associated with transaction volumes for a specified period. Under the outsourcing model, when a client institutions customer account base grows, and the institution exceeds the minimum account processing levels, outsourcing revenue can increase. For both in-house and outsourced license contracts, maintenance fees are normally billed annually in advance and recognized as revenue ratably during the specified maintenance period. The Company also recognizes reimbursable client expenses as revenue in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 01-14, Income Statement Characterization of Reimbursement Received for Out-of-Pocket Expenses Incurred (EITF 01-14), which requires that the reimbursement received for out-of-pocket expenses be classified as revenues and not as cost reductions.
12
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, selected statement of operations data:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
||||||||
Dollars in thousands |
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
||||||||
|
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
||||
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Products |
|
$ |
7,112 |
|
$ |
4,132 |
|
$ |
19,073 |
|
$ |
10,813 |
|
Services |
|
7,264 |
|
10,232 |
|
20,560 |
|
25,102 |
|
||||
Processing |
|
4,557 |
|
4,743 |
|
13,837 |
|
13,835 |
|
||||
Software maintenance and other |
|
5,015 |
|
4,546 |
|
15,295 |
|
12,689 |
|
||||
Customer reimbursements |
|
1,211 |
|
1,562 |
|
3,439 |
|
4,434 |
|
||||
Total revenues |
|
$ |
25,159 |
|
$ |
25,215 |
|
$ |
72,204 |
|
$ |
66,873 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Percentage Relationship to Total Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Products |
|
28.3 |
% |
16.4 |
% |
26.4 |
% |
16.2 |
% |
||||
Services |
|
28.9 |
|
40.6 |
|
28.5 |
|
37.5 |
|
||||
Processing |
|
18.1 |
|
18.8 |
|
19.2 |
|
20.7 |
|
||||
Software maintenance and other |
|
19.9 |
|
18.0 |
|
21.2 |
|
19.0 |
|
||||
Customer reimbursements |
|
4.8 |
|
6.2 |
|
4.7 |
|
6.6 |
|
||||
Total revenues |
|
100.0 |
|
100.0 |
|
100.0 |
|
100.0 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Product development |
|
22.5 |
|
17.8 |
|
22.3 |
|
17.0 |
|
||||
Product support |
|
6.5 |
|
6.6 |
|
6.8 |
|
6.6 |
|
||||
Services |
|
23.7 |
|
22.0 |
|
23.1 |
|
22.0 |
|
||||
Processing |
|
17.3 |
|
16.4 |
|
16.7 |
|
18.4 |
|
||||
Sales and marketing |
|
12.4 |
|
11.6 |
|
13.8 |
|
13.9 |
|
||||
General, administrative and other |
|
12.5 |
|
10.7 |
|
12.2 |
|
12.3 |
|
||||
Customer reimbursement expense |
|
4.8 |
|
6.2 |
|
4.8 |
|
6.7 |
|
||||
Impairment charge |
|
37.8 |
|
|
|
13.2 |
|
|
|
||||
Restructuring charge |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
0.4 |
|
1.1 |
|
||||
Total operating expenses |
|
137.5 |
|
94.3 |
|
113.3 |
|
98.0 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Earnings (loss) from operations |
|
(37.5 |
) |
5.7 |
|
(13.3 |
) |
2.0 |
|
||||
Interest income, net |
|
0.3 |
|
0.6 |
|
0.3 |
|
1.4 |
|
||||
Gain on investment |
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
||||
Foreign exchange income (loss) |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
(0.3 |
) |
0.2 |
|
||||
Earnings (loss) before income taxes |
|
(37.2 |
) |
6.8 |
|
(13.1 |
) |
3.6 |
|
||||
Income tax provision |
|
0.3 |
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
||||
Net earnings (loss) |
|
(37.5 |
)% |
5.2 |
% |
(13.1 |
)% |
2.6 |
% |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
Three Months Ended September 30, 2003 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2002
REVENUES
Total revenues decreased by $56,000 in the third quarter of 2003 as compared to the third quarter of 2002.
Product revenue increased by $3.0 million, or 72%, from the third quarter of 2002 to the third quarter of 2003. Product revenues increased primarily as a result of license revenue that was recognized for projects currently being implemented with customers in Canada and Thailand. In addition, the recognition of revenue from several license expansions from clients who are expanding their use of the Companys software and the accretion of previously deferred product revenues from a significant U.S. outsourcing customer also contributed to the increase in product revenues.
Service revenues decreased by $3.0 million, or 29%, in the quarter ended September 30, 2003, as compared to the quarter ended September 30, 2002. Included in service revenues a year ago was the one-time settlement of $2.9 million from a receivable with a former client. Other service revenues reported for the quarter were driven by two on-going implementation projects, as well as on-going projects within the Companys installed banking and brokerage customer base and the accretion of previously deferred service revenues.
Processing revenues decreased by $186,000, or 4%, in the third quarter of 2003 as compared to the third quarter of 2002. The decrease in processing revenues is primarily reflective of the discontinuance of processing services from a client in the second quarter of 2003 and a reduction in services provided to another client during the past year. These decreases were partially offset by the additional processing revenue generated as a result of a significant U.S. customer launching its offering earlier in the year.
Software maintenance and other revenues increased by $469,000, or 10%, from the third quarter of 2002 to the third quarter of 2003. The increase is attributable to maintenance fees from new clients and the maintenance fees associated with license expansions from existing clients.
Customer reimbursement revenues decreased by $351,000, or 23%, in the quarter ended September 30, 2003, as compared to the quarter ended September 30, 2002. The primary reason for the decrease can be attributed to less reimbursable expenses incurred as a result of fewer implementation projects in the third quarter of 2003 as compared to the third quarter of 2002.
OPERATING EXPENSES
Product development expenses increased $1.2 million, or 26%, in the third quarter of 2003 compared to the same period in 2002, primarily due to the increased usage of external consulting resources. Also contributing to the increase were higher compensation, benefit, occupancy and various allocated overhead costs.
Product support expenses decreased $23,000, or 1%, in the third quarter of 2003 compared to the third quarter of 2002. This decrease is primarily due to lower third-party maintenance costs as a result of the Companys efforts to transfer certain maintenance work from third party resources to in-house resources.
Service expenses increased by $414,000, or 8%, during the quarter ended September 30, 2003, as compared to the quarter ended September 30, 2002. The primary reason for the increase in service expenses is due to less deferral of expenses related to the implementation of the outsourcing solution. Service margins in the third quarter of 2003 were 18%, compared to 46% in the third quarter of 2002. The primary reasons for the drop in service margins were lower utilization rates of internal resources and lower margins related to revenues from certain outsourcing clients that are being recognized over the estimated customer life when compared to the quarter ended September 30, 2002.
Processing expenses increased $204,000, or 5%, in the third quarter of 2003 as compared to 2002. This increase is partially attributable to an increase in internal resources working on our processing clients as well as the incremental costs associated with an additional client on the processing platform. These increases were partially offset by lower third party processing fees as some clients reduced their services.
Sales and marketing expenses increased by $190,000, or 6%, in the second quarter of 2003 compared to the same quarter in 2002. Expenses were up primarily due to an increase in external marketing spending.
14
General, administrative and other expenses increased by $459,000, or 17%, in the quarter ended September 30, 2003, compared to the quarter ended September 30, 2002. The increase includes higher compensation and benefits as well as higher insurance, recruitment, external legal and other professional fees.
Customer reimbursement expenses decreased by $351,000, or 23%, in the quarter ended September 30, 2003, as compared to the quarter ended September 30, 2002. The primary reason for the decrease can be attributed to less reimbursable expenses incurred as a result of fewer implementation projects in the third quarter of 2003 as compared to the third quarter of 2002.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2003, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $9.5 million. During the third quarter the Company performed an assessment of the goodwill associated with the Companys Wealth Management Division. The Company engaged an external valuation specialist to assist in this assessment. Based upon this assessment, the Company determined that the carrying value of the Reporting Unit exceeded its fair value. While performing the goodwill realizability analysis, the Company determined that there also was an impairment to certain amortizable intangible assets associated with the Reporting Unit, primarily the customer relationships and acquired technology, resulting in an impairment charge of approximately $5.5 million to write down the asset group to its fair value. The Company then determined the fair value of the goodwill associated with the Reporting Unit in accordance with SFAS No. 142, resulting in an impairment charge related to goodwill of approximately $4.0 million.
OTHER INCOME, EXPENSE AND TAXES
Interest income for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 decreased $80,000, or 54%, compared to the quarter ended September 30, 2002, primarily due to lower interest rates in 2003.
The Companys effective tax rate in the third quarter of 2003 was 1% of earnings compared to 24% in the third quarter of 2002. The reason for the change is primarily due to the impairment charge related to the Wealth Management Reporting Unit, which is not deductible for income tax purposes and the recording of a valuation allowance against deferred taxes in Canada.
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003, Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2002
REVENUES
Total revenues increased by $5.3 million, or 8%, in the nine months ended September 30, 2003, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2002.
Product revenues increased by $8.3 million, or 76%, from the nine months ended September 30, 2002 to the nine months ended September 30, 2003. The increase in product revenue is primarily attributable to the license revenue realized from two of the Companys major implementation projects in Canada and Thailand. In addition, the recognition of several license expansions from clients who are expanding their use of the Companys software and the accretion of previously deferred product revenues from a significant U.S. customer also contributed to the increase in product revenues. Also contributing to the increase in product revenues was the revenue associated with the acquisition of our Wealth Management Division in July 2002.
Service revenues decreased by $4.5 million, or 18%, in the nine months ended September 30, 2003, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2002. Included in service revenues during the nine months ended September 30, 2002 was $3.2 million in revenue related to a favorable arbitration ruling in respect to a dispute with 1stWebbankdirect. Also during the first nine months of 2002, the Company settled an outstanding receivable with a former client and as a result recognized $2.9 million in related services revenues. Partially offsetting the decrease in service revenues was the revenue associated with the acquisition of our Wealth Management Division in July 2002. Service revenues reported for the current year were driven by two on-going implementation projects, as well as on-going projects within the Companys installed banking and brokerage customer base and the accretion of previously deferred service revenues.
Processing revenues increased by $2,000 in the nine months ended September 30, 2003, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2002. Processing revenues increased only slightly as a result of a majority of clients remaining within their monthly minimum processing volumes. During the nine months ended September 30, 2003, Juniper Bank discontinued processing on the outsourcing platform. The revenue generated from this client was immaterial for the nine months ended September 30, 2003.
15
Software maintenance and other revenues increased $2.6 million, or 21%, from the nine months ended September 30, 2002 to the nine months ended September 30, 2003. The increase can be primarily attributed to the commencement of maintenance for a significant U.S. customer in mid-2002, the start of maintenance at a client in Thailand as well as the one-time termination fee from a U.S. customer recognized in the nine months ended September 30, 2003. Also contributing to the increase in maintenance and other revenues was the revenue associated with the acquisition of our Wealth Management Division in July 2002.
Customer reimbursement revenues decreased $995,000, or 22%, in the nine months ended September 30, 2003, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2002. The primary reason for the decrease can be attributed to less travel required for implementation projects in the nine months ended September 30, 2003 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2002.
OPERATING EXPENSES
Product development expenses increased $4.7 million, or 42%, in the first nine months of 2003 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2002, primarily due to the costs associated with our Wealth Management Division, which was acquired in July 2002. Contributing to the net increase was an increase in the net amortization of previously deferred license costs for clients using the outsourced solution in 2003 compared to 2002 as well as higher outside consulting expenses resulting from an increase in external resources.
Product support expenses increased by $486,000, or 11%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2003, primarily due to the costs associated with our Wealth Management Division, which was acquired in July 2002. Partially offsetting this increase was lower third party support fees as the Company has begun to handle more support matters with its own resources.
Service expenses increased by $2.0 million, or 14%, during the nine months ended September 30, 2003, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2002. The primary reason for the increase in service expenses is due to less deferral of expenses related to the implementation of the outsourcing solution as well as the costs associated with the Wealth Management Division. Service margins for the nine months ended September 30, 2003, were 19%, compared to 42% in the nine months ended September 30, 2002. The primary causes for the drop in the service margin were lower utilization rates of internal resources and lower margins related to certain outsourcing projects that are being recognized over the estimated customer life when compared to the same period ended September 30, 2002.
Processing expenses decreased $203,000, or 2%, in the first nine months of 2003, as compared to the same period in 2002. This decrease is attributable to lower third party processing fees and maintenance costs related to outside vendors. The addition of the Wealth Management Division partially offset these reductions. The gross margin relative to processing was 13% during the nine months ended September 30, 2003, as compared to 11% during the same period in 2002.
Sales and marketing expenses increased by $653,000, or 7%, in the nine months ended September 30, 2003, compared to 2002. This increase is primarily due to the addition of the Wealth Management Division expenses. This was partially offset by lower commissions paid to third party partners as well as lower travel expenses.
General, administrative and other expenses increased by $606,000, or 7%, in 2003 primarily due to the Wealth Management Division expenses. These were partially offset by a decrease in bad debt and legal expense in the first nine months of 2003 compared to the same period in 2002.
Customer reimbursement expense decreased $995,000, or 22%, in the nine months ended September 30, 2003, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2002. The primary reason for the decrease can be attributed to less travel required for implementation projects in the nine months ended September 30, 2003, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2002.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2003, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $9.5 million. During the third quarter the Company performed an assessment of the goodwill associated with the Companys Wealth Management Division. The Company engaged an external valuation specialist to assist in this assessment. Based upon this assessment, the Company determined that the carrying value of the Reporting Unit exceeded its fair value. While performing the goodwill realizability analysis, the Company determined that there also was an impairment to certain amortizable intangible assets associated with the Reporting Unit, primarily the customer relationships and acquired technology, resulting in an impairment charge of approximately $5.5 million to write down the asset group to its fair value. The Company then determined the fair value of the goodwill associated with the Reporting Unit in accordance with SFAS No. 142, resulting in an impairment charge related to goodwill
16
of approximately $4.0 million.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2003, the Company incurred restructuring costs primarily related to its relocation of its European headquarters from Chester, U.K. to Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Restructuring charges recorded in connection with these actions totaled approximately $316,000, which consisted primarily of severance related payments.
OTHER INCOME, EXPENSE AND TAXES
Interest income for the nine months ended September 30, 2003, decreased $670,000 or 75% compared to the same period in 2002. Interest income in 2002 included interest received related to the settlement of an outstanding receivable with a former client. Also contributing to the decrease are lower interest rates in 2003 and lower cash reserves following the acquisition of Spectra Software in July 2002.
During 2003s first nine months, the Company recognized a net gain of $156,000 on the settlement of an investment in a partner company in Poland.
The Company incurred a foreign exchange loss of $194,000 during the first nine months of 2003, primarily as a result of a weakening U.S. dollar against the Canadian dollar. The Companys foreign exchange exposure is primarily related to intercompany activity that was not designated as permanent in the first quarter of 2003.
The Companys effective tax rate in the first nine months of 2003 was 0% of earnings compared to 33% in the same period of 2002. The reason for this decrease is primarily due to the impairment charge related to the Wealth Management Reporting Unit, which is not deductible for income tax purposes.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash and cash equivalents were $28.0 million at September 30, 2003, a decrease of $4.7 million from December 31, 2002. Cash used by operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2003, was $3.4 million compared to cash provided by operating activities of $9.4 million for the comparable 2002 period. Contributing to the use of cash by operating activities was an increase in the net amortization of deferred revenues and expenses during the nine months ended September 30, 2003 compared to the same period in 2002. This increase in net amortization is primarily attributable to fewer implementation projects related to outsourcing clients where associated revenues and direct costs were deferred. During the first nine months of 2003, the Company used $2.0 million for the purchase of property and equipment, while financing activities contributed $525,000 of cash during the nine months ended September 30, 2003, principally from the proceeds from the employee stock purchase plan.
The Company currently anticipates that cash generated from operations and existing cash balances will be sufficient to satisfy its operating and capital cash needs for the foreseeable future and, at a minimum, through the next year. Should the Companys business expand more rapidly than expected, the Company has a line of credit of $20 million available for its use. The Companys line of credit is secured with the Companys primary banker and has a term of three years which expires on July 2, 2006. Outstanding amounts shall bear an interest rate per annum from one of the following two options; (1) a Base Rate option that is equal to the Banks prime rate or one quarter of one (.25) percentage point above the Federal Funds Rate, (2) a LIBOR Rate Option equal to the sum of (i) LIBOR plus (ii) 150 basis points (the LIBOR-Based Rate). At the current time the Company has not drawn on this line of credit and has no debt outstanding.
The Company believes that its business is generally not seasonal; however, the Company has historically experienced, and can be expected to continue to experience, a certain degree of variability in its quarterly revenue, earnings and cash flow patterns. This variability is typically driven by significant events, which directly impact the recognition and billing of project-related revenues. Examples of such events include the timing of new business contract closings and the initiation of product and service fee revenue recognition, one-time payments from existing clients relative to license expansion rights (required to process a greater number of customer accounts or expand the number of permitted users) and completion of implementation project rollouts and the related revenue recognition. Because a high percentage of the Companys expenses are relatively fixed, a variation in the timing of the initiation or the completion of client projects, particularly at or near the end of any quarter, can cause significant variations in operating results from quarter to quarter. The Company believes that over the course of time the ongoing monthly revenue stream associated with the outsourcing operations will contribute toward more predictable quarter-to-quarter revenues.
17
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, which addresses the consolidation by business enterprises of variable interest entities as defined in the Interpretation. Interpretation No. 46 requires that its provisions are effective immediately for all arrangements entered into after January 31, 2003. For those arrangements entered into prior to January 31, 2003, Interpretation No. 46 provisions are required to be adopted at the beginning of the first interim or annual period beginning after December 15, 2003. The Company does not expect that the provisions of Interpretation No. 46 will have a material impact on the Companys results of operations or financial position.
Forward-looking Statements
Certain matters discussed in this Form 10-Q contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including, but not limited to, statements concerning the Companys revenues, expenses and earnings, future operating and financial performance, growth rates, acquisition opportunities, and other similar forecasts and expectations. The words anticipate, estimate, believe, expect, intend, plan, project and variations of these words and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are based on operating budgets, forecasts, beliefs and assumptions of management and, as such, are subject to risks and uncertainties and are not guarantees of future performance. Actual outcomes could differ materially from those expressed in any such forward-looking statement due to a variety of factors in addition to those specifically identified herein. These factors include, without limitation, the timely and successful integration of new businesses and products of recently acquired companies and the risks associated with acquisitions, changes in or interpretations of tax laws, treaties, or regulations, governmental and public policy changes, business and economic conditions, currency fluctuations, challenges the Company may face as it expands its international operations, the development of the markets or new business areas that the Company is targeting, demand for products and services in the financial services industry, the extent to which the Internet will be used for financial services and products, the potentially adverse impact of consolidation in the financial services industry, timing of contracts and long sales cycles, competition among technology companies serving our industry, renewal of material contracts with clients, potential delays in, or cancellation of, the implementation of products and services, undetected software errors or failures found in new products, the potentially adverse effect of business interruptions beyond the Companys control, such as security breaches and future acts of terrorism, maintaining good relationships with key strategic partners, the Companys ability to attract, hire, and retain skilled and knowledgeable employees, success of the Companys business model, changes in and availability of capital requirements, the Companys ability to protect its intellectual property rights, and outcomes of pending and future litigation. In addition, the Companys operating results may fluctuate significantly and the Company may not be able to maintain historical growth rates or meet anticipated growth levels. The Companys stock price fluctuates and may continue to be volatile. The Company has investments in other companies, which are inherently risky. These risks, as well as risks identified in the Companys other SEC filings and public announcements, may impact future results. The Company undertakes no duty to publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
18
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Interest Rate Risk
The Companys exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to the Companys cash equivalents. The Company does not have any derivative financial instruments in its portfolio. The Company is averse to principal loss and ensures the safety and preservation of its invested funds by limiting default risk, market risk and reinvestment risk. The Company does not expect any material loss with respect to its cash equivalents.
Foreign Currency Risk
The Company does not use foreign exchange forward contracts. Substantially all of the Companys U.S. based operations contract in U.S. dollars. For the Companys foreign subsidiaries, the Company generally matches local currency revenues with local currency costs. The Company does have certain inter-company relationships that may create foreign exchange gains or losses.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, 2003, and based on their evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
The evaluation referred to above did not identify any changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2003 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Audit Process and Auditors
Under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, auditors are prohibited from providing non-audit services to audit clients without the advance approval of the audit committee. The Audit Committee has also put in place a procedure for approval of the permitted non-audit services by one of three Audit Committee members in between meetings, subject to subsequent ratification by the full Audit Committee.
19
ITEM 6: EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM8-K
a) Exhibit 31.1. Section 302 CEO Certification.
b) Exhibit 31.2. Section 302 CFO Certification.
c) Exhibit 32.1. CEO-CFO Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
No other applicable items.
20
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
SANCHEZ COMPUTER ASSOCIATES, INC. |
|
/s/ TODD A. PITTMAN |
Todd A. Pittman |
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
Dated: November 14, 2003
21