SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20459
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED September 30, 2003
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 0-20970
VISION-SCIENCES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware |
|
13-3430173 |
(State or other jurisdiction of |
|
(IRS Employer |
|
|
|
9 Strathmore Road, Natick, MA |
|
01760 |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
|
|
|
(508) 650-9971 |
||
(Registrants telephone number, including area code) |
||
|
|
|
None |
||
(Former name, former address, and |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirement for the past 90 days.
Yes ý |
|
No o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o |
|
No ý |
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of September 30, 2003.
|
Common Stock, par value of $.01 |
|
|
30,207,828 |
(Title of Class) |
|
(Number of Shares) |
VISION-SCIENCES, INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibits |
|
2
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1: FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
VISION-SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(Unaudited)
|
|
September 30, |
|
March 31, |
|
||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
375,663 |
|
$ |
2,744,143 |
|
Marketable securities |
|
2,139,355 |
|
125,072 |
|
||
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $73,425 and $77,185, respectively |
|
1,167,572 |
|
736,711 |
|
||
Inventories |
|
1,107,413 |
|
1,160,372 |
|
||
Prepaid expenses and deposits |
|
45,500 |
|
51,113 |
|
||
Total current assets |
|
4,835,503 |
|
4,817,411 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Property and Equipment, at cost: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Machinery and equipment |
|
3,436,398 |
|
3,393,099 |
|
||
Furniture and fixtures |
|
212,002 |
|
208,934 |
|
||
Leasehold improvements |
|
471,886 |
|
467,620 |
|
||
|
|
4,120,286 |
|
4,069,653 |
|
||
Less-Accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
3,634,633 |
|
3,529,977 |
|
||
|
|
485,653 |
|
539,676 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Advance to Three BY Ltd |
|
216,500 |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Other assets, net of accumulated amortization of $44,258 and $41,087, respectively |
|
86,588 |
|
89,759 |
|
||
Total assets |
|
$ |
5,624,244 |
|
$ |
5,446,846 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Acceptances payable to a bank |
|
$ |
28,902 |
|
$ |
10,621 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
472,712 |
|
294,312 |
|
||
Accrued expenses |
|
867,349 |
|
804,139 |
|
||
Total current liabilities |
|
1,368,963 |
|
1,109,072 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Potential obligations to non-qualified option holders |
|
829,100 |
|
201,648 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Stockholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Common stock, $.01 par value |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Authorized50,000,000 shares Issued and outstanding30,207,828 shares at September 30, 2003 and 29,588,280 shares at March 31, 2003 |
|
302,078 |
|
295,882 |
|
||
Additional paid-in capital |
|
60,523,343 |
|
60,082,930 |
|
||
Accumulated deficit |
|
(57,399,240 |
) |
(56,242,686 |
) |
||
Total stockholders equity |
|
3,426,181 |
|
4,136,126 |
|
||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
5,624,244 |
|
$ |
5,446,846 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
VISION-SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three
Months Ended |
|
Six Months
Ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
||||
Net sales |
|
$ |
2,106,754 |
|
$ |
1,512,124 |
|
$ |
4,067,237 |
|
$ |
3,246,583 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
1,304,769 |
|
1,091,678 |
|
2,507,666 |
|
2,364,164 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Gross profit |
|
801,985 |
|
420,446 |
|
1,559,571 |
|
882,419 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses (1) |
|
936,327 |
|
795,095 |
|
1,807,752 |
|
1,583,154 |
|
||||
Research and development expenses (1) |
|
135,695 |
|
95,922 |
|
295,334 |
|
190,462 |
|
||||
Stock-based compensation |
|
579,235 |
|
(91,576 |
) |
634,988 |
|
(186,083 |
) |
||||
Loss from operations |
|
(849,272 |
) |
(378,995 |
) |
(1,178,503 |
) |
(705,114 |
) |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Interest income |
|
6,541 |
|
12,087 |
|
14,713 |
|
24,234 |
|
||||
Interest expense |
|
|
|
(146 |
) |
|
|
(724 |
) |
||||
Other income, net |
|
3,625 |
|
3,133 |
|
7,236 |
|
10,555 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net loss |
|
$ |
(839,106 |
) |
$ |
(363,921 |
) |
$ |
(1,156,554 |
) |
$ |
(671,049 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Basic and diluted net loss per common share |
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Shares used in computing basic and diluted net loss per common share |
|
30,138,269 |
|
27,198,712 |
|
30,063,148 |
|
27,192,314 |
|
(1) Excludes non-cash stock-based compensation, as follows:
Research and development expenses |
|
$ |
482,170 |
|
$ |
(84,111 |
) |
$ |
519,563 |
|
$ |
(258,472 |
) |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
97,065 |
|
(7,465 |
) |
115,425 |
|
72,389 |
|
||||
Total |
|
$ |
579,235 |
|
$ |
(91,576 |
) |
$ |
634,988 |
|
$ |
(186,083 |
) |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
VISION-SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(Unaudited)
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Stockholders |
|
Total
Comprehensive |
|
|||||||
|
|
Number |
|
$ 01 |
|
Additional |
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Balance, March 31, 2003 |
|
29,588,280 |
|
$ |
295,882 |
|
$ |
60,082,930 |
|
$ |
(56,242,686 |
) |
$ |
4,136,126 |
|
|
|
|
Sale of common stock, net |
|
524,098 |
|
5,241 |
|
323,771 |
|
|
|
329,012 |
|
|
|
|||||
Compensation expense related to employee non-qualified stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
7,536 |
|
|
|
7,536 |
|
|
|
|||||
Exercise of incentive stock options |
|
95,450 |
|
955 |
|
109,106 |
|
|
|
110,061 |
|
|
|
|||||
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,156,554 |
) |
(1,156,554 |
) |
$ |
(1,156,554 |
) |
||||
Total comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(1,156,554 |
) |
||||
Balance September 30, 2003 |
|
30,207,828 |
|
$ |
302,078 |
|
$ |
60,523,343 |
|
$ |
(57,399,240 |
) |
$ |
3,426,181 |
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
VISION-SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
|
Six Months
Ended |
|
Six Months
Ended |
|
||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net loss |
|
$ |
(1,156,554 |
) |
$ |
(671,049 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used for operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
107,827 |
|
108,083 |
|
||
Stock compensation for non-qualified options |
|
634,988 |
|
(186,083 |
) |
||
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Accounts receivable |
|
(430,861 |
) |
214,577 |
|
||
Inventories |
|
52,959 |
|
(156,861 |
) |
||
Prepaid expenses and deposits |
|
5,613 |
|
(4,145 |
) |
||
Accounts payable |
|
178,400 |
|
139,715 |
|
||
Accrued expenses |
|
63,210 |
|
(159,937 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net cash used for operating activities |
|
(544,418 |
) |
(715,700 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash flows used for investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Increase in marketable securities |
|
(2,014,283 |
) |
(1,878,668 |
) |
||
Purchase of property and equipment, net |
|
(50,633 |
) |
(88,055 |
) |
||
Advances to Three BY Ltd |
|
(216,500 |
) |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net cash used for investing activities |
|
(2,281,416 |
) |
(1,966,723 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash flows provided by (used for) financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Payments on note payable for leasehold improvements |
|
|
|
(23,989 |
) |
||
Proceeds from acceptances payable to a bank |
|
18,281 |
|
20,195 |
|
||
Proceeds from the sale of common stock, net |
|
329,012 |
|
|
|
||
Exercise of stock options |
|
110,061 |
|
20,500 |
|
||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
457,354 |
|
16,706 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
(2,368,480 |
) |
(2,665,717 |
) |
||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
2,744,143 |
|
2,890,364 |
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
375,663 |
|
$ |
224,647 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash paid during the period for interest |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
724 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Supplemental Disclosure of Non-cash Items from Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Exercise of non-qualified options transferred to equity during the period |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
104,452 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Fair market value of non-qualified options granted in the period |
|
$ |
1,411,550 |
|
$ |
79,854 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Change in the fair market value of non-qualified options existing at the beginning of the period |
|
$ |
627,452 |
|
$ |
(265,937 |
) |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
6
VISION-SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
1. Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared by the Company in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and include, in the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting only of normal and recurring adjustments) that the Company considers necessary for a fair presentation of such information. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. The Company believes, however, that its disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Companys latest annual report to stockholders. The results for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the full fiscal year.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
The accompanying consolidated financial statements reflect the application of certain accounting policies described below:
a. Principles of Consolidation: The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All material intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
b. Cash Equivalents: Cash equivalents are carried at market value, which approximates amortized cost. Cash equivalents are short-term, highly liquid investments with original maturities of less than three months.
c. Marketable Securities: Marketable securities are carried at market value, which approximates amortized cost. The Company has classified its investments in marketable securities as available-for-sale securities. At September 30, 2003, the Companys marketable securities consisted of commercial paper and a certificate of deposit with a weighted average maturity of 96 days.
d. Inventories: Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method and consist of the following:
|
|
September 30, |
|
March 31, |
|
||
|
|
|
|
(audited) |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Raw materials |
|
$ |
555,477 |
|
$ |
567,008 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
155,472 |
|
155,723 |
|
||
Finished goods |
|
396,464 |
|
437,641 |
|
||
|
|
$ |
1,107,413 |
|
$ |
1,160,372 |
|
Work-in-process and finished goods inventories consist of material, labor, and manufacturing overhead.
7
e. Depreciation and Amortization: The Company provides for depreciation and amortization using the straight-line method in amounts that allocate the cost of the assets to operations over their estimated useful lives as follows:
Asset Classification |
|
Estimated |
|
Machinery and Equipment |
|
3-5 Years |
|
Furniture and Fixtures |
|
5 Years |
|
Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of their estimated useful lives or the lives of the leases.
f. Basic and Diluted Net Loss Per Common Share: Basic and diluted net loss per common share is based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Shares of common stock issuable pursuant to outstanding stock options have not been considered, as their effect would be antidilutive.
g. Revenue Recognition: The following must occur before the Company recognizes revenue: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (2) delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, (3) the price is fixed or determinable, (4) collectibility is reasonably assured and (5) the fair value of undelivered elements, if any, exists.
h. Foreign Currency Transactions: In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 52, Foreign Currency Translation, the Company charges foreign currency exchange gains or losses, in connection with its purchases of products from vendors in Japan, to operations, and charges foreign exchange translation gains and losses to retained earnings.
i. Income Taxes: The Company accounts for income taxes under the liability method in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. Under SFAS No. 109, deferred tax assets or liabilities are computed based upon the differences between the financial statement and income tax bases of assets and liabilities as measured by the enacted tax rates.
The Company has recorded a valuation allowance equal to its net deferred tax asset due to the uncertainty of realizing the benefit of this asset.
8
j. Accounting for Derivatives: In September 2000, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) issued EITF 00-19, Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in, a Companys Own Stock, which requires freestanding contracts that are settled in a companys own stock, including common stock options and warrants, to be designated as an equity instrument, an asset or a liability. Under the provisions of EITF 00-19, a contract designated as an asset or a liability must be carried at fair value, with any changes in fair value recorded in the results of operations. A contract designated as an equity instrument must be included within equity, and no fair value adjustments are required.
In accordance with EITF 00-19, the Company has determined that outstanding options to non-employees as of September 30, 2003 to purchase 1,463,032 shares of the Companys common stock should be designated as a liability.
The Company valued the non-qualified options outstanding to non-employees at September 30, 2003 and 2002 using the Black-Scholes method. The value of those options increased by $573,583 and decreased by $91,576 in the three months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The Company recorded the charge or credit to stock-based compensation in the accompanying statements of operations for these periods.
k. Employee Stock-based Compensation Arrangements: The Company accounts for its employee stock-based compensation arrangements using the intrinsic value method under the provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and Financial Interpretation No. (FIN) 44. The Company does not recognize stock-based employee compensation cost when the options granted have an exercise price equal to, or greater than, the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of the grant. The Company does recognize stock-based employee compensation cost when the options granted have an exercise price less than the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of the grant.
In June 2003, the Company granted options to purchase 1,295,000 shares of common stock to its employees at an exercise price of $1.04 per share. The fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant was $1.09 per share. As a result, the Company will recognize compensation expense for the difference between the fair market value and the option price over the life of the options. In the three and six months ended September 30, 2003, the Company recognized $5,652 and $7,536, respectively of expense as stock-based compensation in the consolidated statement of operations.
9
In accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure, beginning in the quarter ending March 31, 2003, the Company adopted the disclosure requirements of FASB No. 148. Had compensation expense for all stock option grants to employees been determined under the fair value method at the grant dates, consistent with the method prescribed by SFAS No. 123, the Companys net loss would have changed to the pro forma amounts indicated as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
||||
Net loss as reported |
|
$ |
(839,106 |
) |
$ |
(363,921 |
) |
$ |
(1,156,554 |
) |
$ |
(671,049 |
) |
Stock-based employee compensation as reported |
|
5,652 |
|
|
|
7,536 |
|
|
|
||||
Pro forma stock-based employee compensation |
|
(69,000 |
) |
(86,300 |
) |
(138,000 |
) |
(172,600 |
) |
||||
Net loss - pro forma |
|
$ |
(902,454 |
) |
$ |
(450,221 |
) |
$ |
(1,287,018 |
) |
$ |
(843,649 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net loss per share as reported |
|
$ |
(.03 |
) |
$ |
(.01 |
) |
$ |
(.04 |
) |
$ |
(.02 |
) |
Stock-based employee compensation as reported |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Pro forma stock-based employee compensation |
|
|
|
(.01 |
) |
|
|
(.01 |
) |
||||
Net loss per share - pro forma |
|
$ |
(.03 |
) |
$ |
(.02 |
) |
$ |
(.04 |
) |
$ |
(.03 |
) |
l. Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In May 2003, FASB issued SFAS No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity. SFAS No. 150 is the first phase of the FASBs project on liabilities and equity. SFAS No. 150 provides guidance on how an entity classifies and measures certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. Many of these instruments were previously classified as equity. For example, if an employers issuance of its shares to a key employee requires the employer to redeem the shares upon the employees death, then those shares must be classified as a liability, not as equity. For publicly-held companies, SFAS No. 150 is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003. SFAS No. 150 requires companies to record the cumulative effect of financial instruments existing at the adoption date. The Company does not believe the adoption of SFAS 150 will have a significant effect on the Companys operations, financial position or cash flows.
10
In November 2002, the EITF reached consensus on EITF No. 00-21, Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables. Revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables include arrangements that provide for the delivery or performance of multiple products, services and/or rights to use assets where performance may occur at different points in time or over different periods of time. The Company may enter into arrangements for multiple deliverables that occur at different points in time if it enters into a contract to sell endoscopes and EndoSheaths on a per-procedure basis. EITF No. 00-21 is effective for the Company beginning October 1, 2003. The Company has not completed the evaluation of the impact, if any, of this EITF on its operations.
3. 3DV Systems Ltd.
The Company accounts for its investment in 3DV Systems Ltd. (3DV) using the equity method of accounting. As of September 30, 2003, the Company owned approximately 21% of the outstanding shares of 3DV, and would hold approximately 17% of the shares of 3DV, if all employee options and Convertible Notes were converted to common shares. The Companys investment in 3DV totaled $0 at March 31, 2003, and accordingly, the Company did not recognize any portion of the losses of 3DV for the three or six months ended September 30, 2003.
4. Three BY Ltd.
In June 2003, the Company entered into a Contract Manufacturing Agreement, a Loan Agreement and a Pledge Agreement (collectively, the 3BY Agreements) with Three BY Ltd., an Israeli company (3BY). The 3BY Agreements provide for, among other things, the manufacture of certain of the Companys products by 3BY, and a loan of up to $267,500 by the Company to 3BY for the purchase and installation of certain manufacturing equipment by 3BY, at 3BYs facility, to be used to manufacture certain of the Companys products. As of September 30, 2003, the Company had advanced $216,500 to 3BY, and expects to advance the complete loan by October 31, 2003. After the manufacturing equipment is completed, and production has begun, the Company and 3BY plan to establish a repayment schedule, according to the 3BY Agreements.
11
5. Segment Information
The Company has three reportable segments medical, industrial and corporate. The medical segment designs, manufactures and sells EndoSheaths and sells endoscopes to users in the health care industry. The industrial segment designs, manufactures and sells borescopes to a variety of users, primarily in the aircraft engine manufacturing and aircraft engine maintenance industries. In addition, the industrial segment manufactures and repairs endoscopes for the medical segment. The corporate segment consists of certain administrative expenses applicable to the Company as a whole and the management oversight of the Companys investment in 3DV, Vision-Sciences Ltd. (the Companys Israeli subsidiary) and the Companys support of the University of Georgia Hepatitis Project, Proposal No. 022297-01 (the Egypt Project).
All segments follow the accounting policies described in the summary of significant accounting policies. The Company evaluates segment performance based upon operating income. Identifiable assets are those used directly in the operations of each segment. Corporate assets include cash, marketable securities, the assets of Vision-Sciences, Ltd. and the investment in 3DV. The carrying value of the investment in 3DV at September 30, 2003 was $0. Data regarding managements view of the Companys segments are provided in the following tables.
12
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Medical |
|
Industrial |
|
Corporate |
|
Adjustments |
|
Total |
|
|||||
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Sales to external customers |
|
$ |
1,399,598 |
|
$ |
707,156 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
2,106,754 |
|
Intersegment sales |
|
|
|
409,833 |
|
|
|
(409,833 |
) |
|
|
|||||
Operating income (loss) |
|
16,853 |
|
3,758 |
|
(869,883 |
) |
|
|
(849,272 |
) |
|||||
Interest income (expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
6,541 |
|
|
|
6,541 |
|
|||||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
42,277 |
|
10,062 |
|
|
|
|
|
52,339 |
|
|||||
Advance to 3BY Ltd. |
|
146,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146,522 |
|
|||||
Other significant non-cash items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Stock-based compensation |
|
321 |
|
107 |
|
578,807 |
|
|
|
579,235 |
|
|||||
Expenditures for fixed assets |
|
30,520 |
|
262 |
|
|
|
|
|
30,782 |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Sales to external customers |
|
$ |
848,025 |
|
$ |
664,099 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
1,512,124 |
|
Intersegment sales |
|
|
|
151,041 |
|
|
|
(151,041 |
) |
|
|
|||||
Operating income (loss) |
|
(268,372 |
) |
(14,863 |
) |
(95,760 |
) |
|
|
(378,995 |
) |
|||||
Interest income (expense) |
|
|
|
(146 |
) |
12,087 |
|
|
|
11,941 |
|
|||||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
45,804 |
|
9,870 |
|
|
|
|
|
55,674 |
|
|||||
Advance to 3BY Ltd. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Other significant non-cash items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
(91,576 |
) |
|
|
(91,576 |
) |
|||||
Expenditures for fixed assets |
|
42,999 |
|
19,302 |
|
|
|
|
|
62,301 |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Six months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Sales to external customers |
|
$ |
2,670,615 |
|
$ |
1,396,622 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
4,067,237 |
|
Intersegment sales |
|
|
|
556,217 |
|
|
|
(556,217 |
) |
|
|
|||||
Operating income (loss) |
|
40,675 |
|
(20,771 |
) |
(1,198,407 |
) |
|
|
(1,178,503 |
) |
|||||
Interest income (expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
14,713 |
|
|
|
14,713 |
|
|||||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
87,808 |
|
20,019 |
|
|
|
|
|
107,827 |
|
|||||
Advance to 3BY Ltd. |
|
216,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
216,500 |
|
|||||
Other significant non-cash items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Stock-based compensation |
|
429 |
|
143 |
|
634,416 |
|
|
|
634,988 |
|
|||||
Expenditures for fixed assets |
|
49,121 |
|
1,512 |
|
|
|
|
|
50,633 |
|
|||||
Total assets |
|
2,259,918 |
|
979,314 |
|
2,606,992 |
|
(221,980 |
) |
5,624,244 |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Sales to external customers |
|
$ |
1,856,031 |
|
$ |
1,390,552 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
3,246,583 |
|
Intersegment sales |
|
|
|
353,914 |
|
|
|
(353,914 |
) |
|
|
|||||
Operating income (loss) |
|
(511,362 |
) |
(10,029 |
) |
(183,723 |
) |
|
|
(705,114 |
) |
|||||
Interest income (expense) |
|
|
|
(724 |
) |
24,234 |
|
|
|
23,510 |
|
|||||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
90,021 |
|
18,062 |
|
|
|
|
|
108,083 |
|
|||||
Advance to 3BY Ltd. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Other significant non-cash items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
(186,083 |
) |
|
|
(186,083 |
) |
|||||
Expenditures for fixed assets |
|
57,860 |
|
30,195 |
|
|
|
|
|
88,055 |
|
|||||
Total assets |
|
1,807,078 |
|
1,142,370 |
|
2,446,734 |
|
(256,656 |
) |
5,139,526 |
|
13
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
This discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon our Consolidated Financial Statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. See the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere herein. Certain of our accounting policies require the application of judgment in selecting the appropriate assumptions for calculating financial estimates. By their nature these judgments are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. We periodically evaluate the judgments and estimates used for our critical accounting policies to ensure that such judgments and estimates are reasonable for our interim and year-end reporting requirements. These judgments and estimates are based upon our historical experience, current trends and information available from other sources, as appropriate. If different conditions result from those assumptions used in our judgment, the results could be materially different from our estimates. Our critical accounting policies include the following:
We recognize revenue in accordance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101, Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements (SAB 101), as amended by SAB 101A and 101B, and EITF 00-21. These pronouncements require that five basic criteria must be met before revenue can be recognized: (1) persuasive evidence that an arrangement exists; (2) delivery has occurred or services rendered; (3) the fee is fixed and determinable; (4) collectibility is reasonably assured and (5) the fair value of undelivered elements, if any, exists. Determination of criterion (4) is based on managements judgment regarding the collectibility of invoices for products and services delivered to customers. Determination of criterion (5) is based on managements judgment regarding the fair value of any undelivered elements of a contract. Should changes in conditions cause management to determine these criteria are not met for certain future transactions, revenue recognized for any reporting period could be adversely affected.
Financial instruments, including derivatives and non-qualified options to purchase our common stock, require disclosure of an estimate of their fair values. Fair values are based on listed market prices, where possible. We account for certain non-qualified options granted to non-employees to purchase our common stock in accordance the EITF 00-19, Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in, a Companys Own Stock, and carry these contracts at fair value, with any changes in fair value recorded in the results of operations. Fair values for certain non-qualified options are derived from pricing models that consider current market and contractual prices for the underlying financial instruments or commodities, as well as time value and yield curve or volatility factors underlying the positions. Pricing models and their underlying assumptions impact the amount and timing of unrealized gains and losses recognized, and the use of different pricing models or assumptions could produce different financial results. The Company uses the Black-Scholes method for determining the value of the potential obligation to non-qualified option holders.
14
We account for certain non-qualified options granted to employees to purchase our common stock in accordance with SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. If the fair market value of the underlying stock at the date of grant is greater than the option price, we recognize compensation expense for the difference between the market price and the option price over the life of the options.
Results of Operations
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Examples of forward-looking statements include statements about expectations about future financial results, future products and future sales of new and existing products, future expenditures, and capital resources to meet anticipated requirements. Without limiting the foregoing, the words believes, anticipates, plans, expects, and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, and our actual results may differ significantly from those discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such a difference include, but are not limited to, the availability of capital resources, the availability of third-party reimbursement, government regulation, the availability of supplies, competition, technological difficulties, general economic conditions and other risks detailed in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K and any subsequent periodic filings made with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We do not undertake an obligation to update our forward-looking statements to reflect future events or circumstances.
We develop, manufacture and sell flexible endoscope products for the medical device and industrial device markets. We operate in three reporting segments, medical, industrial and corporate.
The medical segment supplies endoscopes and disposable EndoSheath® Systems (EndoSheaths) to the Ear-Nose-Throat (ENT), gastrointestinal (GI) and pulmonary markets. Health-care providers use EndoSheaths to cover the insertion tube of flexible endoscopes, such as ENT endoscopes, sigmoidoscopes and bronchoscopes. The EndoSheaths allow the health-care providers to process patients economically by permitting the providers to avoid reprocessing the endoscopes after each use. In addition, the EndoSheaths are sterile, thus helping to ensure each patient a contaminant-free procedure.
The industrial segment designs, manufactures and sells flexible endoscopes, termed borescopes, for industrial users, and manufactures and repairs flexible endoscopes for the medical segment. The industrial segment users consist primarily of companies in the aircraft engine manufacturing and maintenance markets and the defense market.
The corporate segment consists of certain administrative and business development activities applicable to the company as a whole, and management oversight of our investments in 3DV, Vision Sciences, Ltd. and the Egypt Project.
15
Sales
Q2 04 Compared to Q2 03
Net sales for the three months ended September 30, 2003 (Q2 04) were $2,106,754, an increase of $594,630, or 39%, compared to the three-month period ended September 30, 2002 (Q2 03). During Q2 04, sales of the medical segment were $1,399,598, an increase of $551,573, or 65%, and sales of the industrial segment were $707,156, an increase of $43,057, or 6%, compared to Q2 03. Medical segment sales to the ENT market include sales of our own ENT endoscope, and ENT EndoSheaths for our ENT endoscope and for the ENT endoscopes of most other major manufacturers. Sales to the GI and pulmonary markets include sales of our proprietary endoscopes and EndoSheaths for use with those endoscopes. Sales termed Other include repairs of our endoscopes and accessories. In the medical segment, the sales and changes in sales by market were as follows ($000s):
Market |
|
Q2 04 |
|
Q2 03 |
|
Increase |
|
Percent |
|
|||
ENT |
|
$ |
1,174 |
|
$ |
709 |
|
$ |
465 |
|
66 |
% |
GI |
|
146 |
|
101 |
|
45 |
|
45 |
% |
|||
Pulmonary |
|
19 |
|
2 |
|
17 |
|
850 |
% |
|||
Other |
|
61 |
|
36 |
|
25 |
|
69 |
% |
|||
Total |
|
$ |
1,400 |
|
$ |
848 |
|
$ |
552 |
|
65 |
% |
Sales of EndoSheaths in Q2 04 were approximately $839,000, an increase of approximately $274,000, or 48%, compared to Q2 03. In addition, sales of ENT endoscopes were approximately $335,000, an increase of approximately $191,000, or 133%, compared to Q2 03. Included in the sales of ENT EndoSheaths in Q2 04 are sales of approximately $10,000 of our new ENT Channeled EndoSheath and ENT Sensory EndoSheath, compared to $0 in Q2 03. The ENT Channeled EndoSheath is designed to allow health-care providers to perform therapeutic procedures in their offices, using conventional diagnostic ENT endoscopes, that currently they can only perform using a therapeutic ENT endoscope that contains a channel, typically in a hospital setting. The channel contained in the ENT Channeled EndoSheath allows the health-care provider to pass tools, such as biopsy forceps or brushes, through it, or to irrigate the sinus cavity of a patient, a common procedure after sinus surgery. Therapeutic ENT endoscopes are typically only found in hospital settings as they represent a large investment.
The ENT Sensory EndoSheath, also designed to be used with conventional flexible ENT endoscopes, allows health-care providers to test for reflux and swallowing disorders in their offices. After sliding the ENT Sensory EndoSheath on to a conventional ENT endoscope, small puffs of air are passed through a channel in the EndoSheath allowing the health-care provider to assess sensation in the larynx by illiciting an airway protective reflex. We believe the ENT Sensory EndoSheath, used in conjunction with an air pulse sensory stimulator, allows health-care providers to expand the use of their conventional flexible ENT endoscopes by performing tests in their offices that currently they can perform only using more expensive therapeutic ENT endoscopes, typically found in hospital settings. We received clearance from the FDA in July 2003 to market the ENT Sensory EndoSheath.
16
The increase in sales of ENT EndoSheaths was due primarily to higher unit volume from the domestic and international markets. Sales to domestic customers were approximately $492,000, an increase of approximately $131,000, or 36%, compared to Q2 03, with unit sales increasing to approximately 53,100 from 33,800 in Q2 03. Sales to international distributors were approximately $347,000, an increase of approximately $143,000, or 70%, with unit sales increasing to approximately 58,600 from 34,900 in Q2 03. The increase in sales to domestic customers resulted primarily from the initial shipment of approximately 22,900 units to Medtronic Xomed, Inc. (Medtronic Xomed) under an exclusive marketing and distribution agreement (the Medtronic Agreement) signed with Medtronic Xomed on August 6, 2003, which became effective on September 19, 2003. The terms and expected effect of the Medtronic Agreement are discussed below.
The increase in sales of ENT endoscopes was due primarily to higher unit volume from the domestic and international markets. Sales to domestic customers were approximately $220,000, and increase of $110,000, or 100%, compared to Q2 03. Sales to international distributors were approximately $115,000, an increase of $81,000, or 245%, compared to Q2 03. In general, the sales cycle of endoscopes is longer and less predictable than the sales cycle of EndoSheaths. Sales of endoscopes to domestic customers included $24,300 to Medtronic Xomed.
The initial term of the Medtronic Agreement is three years. Thereafter, the Medtronic Agreement will be automatically renewed for successive one-year periods, unless terminated by either party upon advance written notice. Under the Medtronic Agreement, we have granted Medtronic Xomed exclusive distribution rights in the United States and Canada to market and sell our ENT EndoSheaths and ENT endoscopes to ENT practitioners. Medtronic Xomed has agreed to certain minimum purchase requirements for the initial twelve-month period of the term. We expect the Medtronic Agreement will result in an increase in sales of our ENT EndoSheaths and ENT endoscopes due to the significantly greater marketing and sales capabilities of Medtronic Xomed. In addition, the Medtronic Agreement is expected to facilitate the introduction of new ENT products by allowing quicker market acceptance of these products. As a result of the Medtronic Agreement, the success of our ENT product lines will be substantially dependent upon the success of the marketing and sales activities of Medtronic Xomed over which we have limited control.
The increase in sales to international distributors is primarily due to higher demand, especially from Europe and Australia. In addition to continuing to promote our existing products to the international market, we plan to introduce our new products to these distributors. Further, we continue to seek new distributors who have a strong ENT presence in countries where we have no representation. Our business is subject to the typical risks associated with operating in international markets, including longer sales cycles, exposure to adverse changes in currency exchange rates and compliance with local customs, rules and regulations. Despite the increase in sales to international distributors and our continuing marketing and sales efforts in international markets, there can be no assurance that our sales to international distributors will continue to increase at the same rate, or at all.
The increase in sales to the GI (Gastrointestinal) market in Q2 04 was due primarily to higher prices for GI EndoSheaths. Unit sales of GI EndoSheaths were flat compared to Q2 03. We expect demand for these EndoSheaths will remain flat, or decline, due to reimbursement rates to health-care providers being insufficient to support the use of our GI EndoSheaths for those gastrointestinal procedures.
17
The increase in sales to the pulmonary market was due primarily to higher demand for our bronchoscopes. In Q2 04 we sold two bronchoscopes, whereas we sold none in Q2 03. The sales cycle for all endoscopes can be lengthy, especially for our proprietary endoscopes, due primarily to the commitment that customers must make to use our proprietary EndoSheath. We expect sales to this market will improve, compared to the fiscal year ended March 31, 2003, but there is no assurance that such an improvement will occur.
Industrial Segment
The increase in sales of the industrial segment was due to higher demand for jet engine repair services, offset by lower demand for new equipment due to continued slowness in the market for new jet engines.
6 Months 04 Compared to 6 Months 03
Net sales for the six months ended September 30, 2003 (6M 04) were $4,067,237, an increase of $820,654, or 25%, compared to the six-month period ended September 30, 2002 (6M 03). During 6M 04, sales of the medical segment were $2,670,615, an increase of $814,584, or 44%, compared to 6M 03. Sales of the industrial segment were $1,396,622, an increase of $6,070, or 0%, compared to 6M 03. In the medical segment, the sales and changes in sales by market were as follows ($000s):
Market |
|
6M 04 |
|
6M 03 |
|
Increase |
|
Percent |
|
|||
ENT |
|
$ |
2,232 |
|
$ |
1,538 |
|
$ |
694 |
|
45 |
% |
GI |
|
297 |
|
220 |
|
77 |
|
35 |
% |
|||
Pulmonary |
|
32 |
|
29 |
|
3 |
|
59 |
% |
|||
Other |
|
109 |
|
69 |
|
40 |
|
36 |
% |
|||
Total |
|
$ |
2,670 |
|
$ |
1,856 |
|
$ |
814 |
|
44 |
% |
Medical Segment ENT Market
Sales of EndoSheaths in 6M 04 were approximately $1,724,000, an increase of $491,000, or 40%, compared to 6M 03. In addition, sales of ENT endoscopes were approximately $508,000, an increase of approximately $203,000, or 67%, compared to 6M 03. The sales of EndoSheaths include sales of approximately $14,000 of our new ENT Channeled EndoSheath and the ENT Sensory EndoSheath.
Sales of EndoSheaths in 6M 04 to domestic customers were approximately $893,000, an increase of $169,000, or 23%, while sales of EndoSheaths to international distributors were approximately $831,000, an increase of $322,000, or 63%, compared to 6M 03. The unit volume of ENT EndoSheaths increased by 50% to approximately 231,500 in 6M 04 from 154,800 in 6M 03. The unit volume to domestic customers increased by 34%, while it increased by 62% to international distributors. The lower percentage increase in domestic dollar sales of EndoSheaths compared to the increase in units is due primarily to the initial shipments of EndoSheaths to Medtronic Xomed. Although the average unit sales price of EndoSheaths sold under the Medtronic Agreement is lower than the average unit sales price of EndoSheaths sold directly to domestic customers, we expect that the increased unit sales will result in a total contribution margin comparable to the contribution margin in our FY 04 budget. The average sales price of EndoSheaths sold to international distributors remained approximately the same for 6M 04, compared to 6M 03.
18
Sales of endoscopes in 6M 04 to domestic customers, including Medtronic Xomed, were approximately $287,000, an increase of $50,000 due primarily to a higher volume of units at average selling prices that were lower by approximately 6%, compared to 6M 03. Sales of endoscopes to international distributors were approximately $221,000, an increase of $154,000 due primarily to higher unit volume, and higher average selling price increase of approximately 4%.
Medical Segment GI and Pulmonary Markets
Sales to the GI market increased due to higher unit prices, offset by lower unit volume of 8%, due again to the lack of reimbursement. Sales to the pulmonary market were marginally higher due to higher unit volume of EndoSheaths.
Industrial Market
Sales to the industrial market were marginally higher in 6M 04, compared to 6M 03. We expect sales to this market will remain approximately the same in FY 04 as in FY 03.
Gross Profit
Gross profit in Q2 04 increased to $801,985, or 38% of net sales, compared to $420,446, or 28% of net sales in Q2 03. Gross profit in the medical segment was approximately $611,000 an increase of $374,800, compared to Q2 03. Gross profit in the industrial segment was approximately $191,000, an increase of $6,800, compared to Q2 03. The increase in gross profit in the medical segment was due primarily to the higher volume of ENT EndoSheath and endoscope units sold to both the domestic and international markets, and to lower unit costs of the ENT EndoSheath, resulting from full implementation of our new manufacturing equipment in Natick MA. In addition, higher prices attained for GI EndoSheaths added to the increase in gross profit. In the industrial segment, the increase in gross profit was due primarily to a more favorable product mix and higher absorption of manufacturing overhead.
Gross profit in 6M 04 increased to $1,559,571, or 38% of sales, compared to $882,419, or 27% of sales in 6M 03. Gross profit in the medical segment was approximately $1,206,400, an increase of $723,300, compared to 6M 03. Gross profit in the industrial segment was approximately $353,100, a decrease of $46,200, compared to 6M 03. The primary causes of the change in gross profit for both segments in 6M 04, compared to 6M 03 were the same as for Q2 04, compared to Q2 03.
19
In order to further reduce our production costs, in June 2003 we entered into a contract manufacturing agreement with 3BY, providing for the transfer of the production of our GI and pulmonary EndoSheaths to 3BY. In addition, we have agreed to lend 3BY up to $267,500 to purchase and install a line of equipment that will allow 3BY to manufacture our ENT EndoSheaths. We will then have the ability to manufacture ENT EndoSheaths in both Natick, MA and Israel. The purpose of this transfer of manufacturing is to lower our production costs. As of September 30, 2003, we have advanced approximately $217,000 of the loan amount to 3BY. According to the 3BY Agreements, we will establish a repayment schedule once the production line is operational. Until that time, 3BY has provided us with a security interest in equipment of equal value. We expect shipments of GI and pulmonary EndoSheaths from 3BY will begin in January 2004. We expect shipments of ENT EndoSheaths from 3BY will begin in February 2004. As a result of the 3BY Agreements, we expect that the per unit production costs of our EndoSheaths will decrease by approximately 50%, thereby increasing our gross profit.
The Medtronic Agreement is expected to result in an increase in unit sales of our ENT EndoSheaths and ENT endoscopes, the gross profit benefits of which we expect will be offset by the lower unit sales prices to Medtronic Xomed, compared to our sales prices to domestic end users. Additional benefits of the Medtronic Agreement include the elimination of the commission expense we currently pay to our independent sales representatives for sales of ENT products, the potential reduction of other marketing and sales expenses and the ability to obtain more rapid market acceptance of our new products in the ENT market.
We expect to experience the full effects of the Medtronic Agreement and the 3BY Agreements on our sales and gross profits in our fiscal year beginning April 1, 2004.
Operating Expenses
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses in Q2 04 increased by $141,232, or 18%, compared to Q2 03. SG&A expenses amounted to 44% and 53% of net sales in Q2 04 and Q2 03, respectively. SG&A expenses increased in the medical segment by approximately $38,000, due primarily to higher costs for legal fees related to intellectual property. SG&A expenses declined in the industrial segment by approximately $12,000, due primarily to lower costs for personnel. SG&A expenses increased by approximately $115,000 in the corporate segment due primarily to higher costs for personnel and professional fees.
SG&A expenses increased by $224,598, or 14%, in 6M 04, compared to 6M 03. SG&A expenses increased in the medical segment by approximately $70,400, decreased by approximately $35,400 in the industrial segment and increased by approximately $190,000 due primarily to the same reasons as stated above.
20
Research and Development Expenses
R&D expenses were $135,695, an increase of $39,773 in Q2 04, compared to Q2 03, and were 6% of sales in Q2 04 and in Q2 03. The primary causes for this increase were higher costs for additional personnel hired to work on developing new products for the medical segment, offset by lower costs for outside services in the corporate segment related to CMOS patent applications. We expect costs for R&D will continue to be higher in FY 04, compared to FY 03, as we increase our efforts to develop new products utilizing the technology inherent in our EndoSheaths.
R&D expenses were $295,334 in 6M 04, an increase of $104,872, compared to 6M 03, and were 7% of sales in 6M 04, compared to 6% of sales in 6M 03. The primary causes for the increase were higher costs for additional personnel hired to work on developing new products for the medical segment. R&D costs in the corporate segment increased by approximately $4,000 in 6M 04, compared to 6M 03.
On May 29, 2003 we signed a Development, Supply and Distribution Agreement (DSDA) with Endoscopic Technologies, Inc. (ESTECH), a company with certain proprietary technologies relating to methods for minimally-invasive cardiovascular surgery. In the DSDA, we and ESTECH have agreed to use commercially reasonable and diligent efforts to complete the development of certain products being designed for minimally-invasive surgery, specifically for the treatment of coronary atrial fibrillation. The total value of the product development component of the DSDA is approximately $90,000. According to the terms of the DSDA, as of June 30, 2003, we had invoiced $45,000 to ESTECH, and recorded that total amount in a deferred revenue account within accrued liabilities on the accompanying consolidated financial statements. In the three months ended September 30, 2003, we did not invoice ESTECH, nor did we recognize any revenue from this contract. We plan to utilize percentage-completion accounting to recognize revenue from this contract. We expect to complete the product development stage of the DSDA in the fiscal quarter ending June 30, 2004.
Stock-based Compensation Expenses
Stock-based compensation costs increased by $670,811, due primarily to an increase in the fair value of non-qualified options. This non-cash cost is computed by determining the change in the fair value of stock options granted to non-employees of the Company. We use the Black-Scholes method to calculate the fair value. This method uses stock price volatility, the closing price of our common stock as traded on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market and other factors to determine the fair value of non-qualified options. The increase in the closing price of our common stock to $1.86 per share on the last trading day in the 52-week period measured in Q2 04, from $1.14 per share for the comparable period in Q1 04, was the largest component in the change for the three months ended September 30, 2003.
In addition, during the three months ended June 30, 2003, the compensation committee of our board of directors authorized the issuance of non-qualified options to purchase 1,295,000 shares of common stock to certain of our employees. These options were priced below the fair market price of our common stock on the date of grant. Accordingly, we will recognize compensation expense totaling approximately $65,000 from June 2003 through December 2007, the vesting period of these options.
Stock-based compensation costs increased by $821,071 in 6M 04, compared to 6M 03, due primarily to the increase in the closing price of our common stock, as discussed above.
21
The net loss per share for Q2 04 was $.03, compared to a net loss of $.01 per share for Q2 03. The net loss excluding the non-cash charge for stock-based compensation costs was $259,871, or $.01 per share in Q2 04, compared to $455,497, or $.02 per share in Q2 03.
The net loss per share for 6M 04 was $.04, compared to $.02 in 6M 03. The net loss excluding the non-cash charge for stock-based compensation costs was $521,566, or $.02 per share in 6M 04, compared to $857,132, or $.03 per share in 6M 03.
Operating Income (Loss)
Operating income (loss) by segment was as follows ($000s):
Segment |
|
Q2 04 |
|
Q2 03 |
|
Change |
|
6M 04 |
|
6M 03 |
|
Change |
|
||||||
Medical |
|
$ |
17 |
|
$ |
(268 |
) |
$ |
285 |
|
$ |
41 |
|
$ |
(511 |
) |
$ |
552 |
|
Industrial |
|
4 |
|
(15 |
) |
19 |
|
(21 |
) |
(10 |
) |
(11 |
) |
||||||
Corporate |
|
(870 |
) |
(96 |
) |
(774 |
) |
(1,198 |
) |
(184 |
) |
(1,014 |
) |
||||||
Total |
|
$ |
(849 |
) |
$ |
(379 |
) |
$ |
(470 |
) |
$ |
(1,178 |
) |
$ |
(705 |
) |
$ |
(473 |
) |
For both the quarterly and six-month periods above, in the medical segment, the improved gross profit was the primary driver for the improvement in operating income (loss). This improved gross profit was partially offset by higher costs for SG&A and R&D expenses. In the industrial segment, the higher gross profit and lower SG&A expenses were the primary drivers for the change. In the corporate segment, the higher costs for stock-based compensation for non-qualified options to non-employees was the primary driver for the higher loss. In addition, the corporate segment incurred higher expenses for personnel costs and professional fees.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At September 30, 2003, our principal source of liquidity was working capital of approximately $3.5 million, including $2.5 million in cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities. At September 30, 2003, we had acceptances payable to a bank totaling approximately $29,000. We have pledged $125,000 to secure the acceptances payable.
We also have an agreement with a bank, which includes a revolving line of credit under which we may borrow up to $1,000,000, net of up to $250,000 of any outstanding letters of credit and bankers acceptances. Borrowings under this loan arrangement must be fully cash collateralized. The agreement also stipulates that when we achieve positive cash flow, as defined in the agreement, we will be eligible to negotiate changes to this loan arrangement that may include changing the borrowing base for revolving loans, and the release of the pledged cash collateral.
22
Our cash and cash equivalents decreased by approximately $2,368,000 in the six months ended September 30, 2003, due primarily to cash used for operations of approximately $544,000 and cash used for investing activities of approximately $2,281,000. These uses were offset by selling new shares to non-affiliated investors for approximately $329,000, net, in a private placement in April 2003, cash generated by employee exercises of stock options of approximately $110,000 and an increase in acceptances payable to a bank of approximately $18,000. Our burn rate for cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities, excluding advances to 3BY, cash received from new equity and option exercises, was approximately $289,000 per quarter for 6M 04, reduced from approximately $404,000 per quarter for 6M 03. We expect our current balance of cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities is sufficient to fund our operations at least for the next twelve months.
In connection with the 3BY Agreements, we have agreed to lend 3BY up to $267,500 to purchase and install a line of equipment that will allow 3BY to manufacture our ENT EndoSheaths. As of September 30, 2003 we have advanced approximately $217,000 of the loan amount to 3BY. We expect to advance the remainder in October 2003. According to the 3BY Agreements, we will establish a repayment schedule once the production line is operational. Until that time, 3BY has provided us a security interest in equipment of equal value.
We expect total spending for property and equipment will not exceed $500,000 for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2004.
We conduct our operations in certain facilities leased from non-related parties. These leases expire on various dates through October 31, 2006. In addition, we have operating leases for certain office equipment leased from non-related parties. These leases expire on various dates through May 2006. Approximate future minimum lease commitments under these leases are as follows:
Year ending March 31, |
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
$ |
302,000 |
|
2005 |
|
309,000 |
|
|
2006 |
|
229,000 |
|
|
2007 |
|
95,000 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
935,000 |
|
We have incurred losses since our inception, and losses are expected to continue at least during the fiscal year ending March 31, 2004 (FY 04). We have funded the losses principally with the proceeds from public and private equity financings. Although we do not anticipate the need for additional financing in FY 04, management has decided that new financing may be desirable. However, there can be no assurance that additional funding will be available, or available on reasonable terms.
23
In the normal course of business, we are subject to the risks associated with fluctuations in interest rates and changes in foreign currency exchange rates.
We maintain a portfolio of marketable, primarily fixed income, available-for-sale securities of various issuers, types and maturities. We have not used derivative financial instruments in our investment portfolio. We attempt to limit our exposure to interest rate and credit risk by placing our investments with high-quality financial institutions and have established investment guidelines relative to diversification and maturities designed to maintain safety and liquidity.
Investments in both fixed-rate and floating-rate interest earning instruments carry a degree of interest rate risk. Fixed-rate securities may have their fair market value adversely impacted due to a rise in interest rates, while floating-rate securities may produce less income than expected if interest rates decline. Due in part to these factors, our future investment income may fall short of expectations due to changes in interest rates, or we may suffer losses in principal if forced to sell securities that have seen a decline in market value due to changes in interest rates.
We face exposure, due to purchases of raw materials from Japanese suppliers, to adverse movements in the value of the Japanese Yen. This exposure may change over time, and could have a materially adverse effect on our financial results. We may attempt to limit this exposure by purchasing forward contracts, as required. Most of our liabilities are settled within 90 days of receipt of materials. At September 30, 2003, our liabilities relating to Japanese Yen were approximately $73,000.
a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.
Based on an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-14(c) and 15d-14(c) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934), the chief executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the three months ended September 30, 2003, are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms and are operating in an effective manner.
b) Changes in Internal Controls.
There were no significant changes in our internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of their most recent evaluation.
24
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Stockholders
We held the 2003 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders (the Annual Meeting) on July 24, 2003. At the Annual Meeting, the following actions were taken:
1. The stockholders re-elected Kenneth W. Anstey and Dr. Gerald B. Lichtenberger as Class III directors to serve for a three-year term. Holders of 23,332,758 shares of Common Stock voted for and holders of 27,740 shares of Common Stock withheld voting for each of Mr. Anstey and Dr. Lichtenberger. In addition to Mr. Anstey and Dr. Lichtenberger, Mr. Katsumi Oneda, Mr. Lewis C. Pell, Mr. Ron Hadani, Mr. William F. Doyle and Mr. John J. Wallace continue to serve on the Board of Directors.
2. The stockholders approved our 2003 Director Stock Option Plan. Holders of 23,264,777 shares of Common Stock voted for, holders of 92,671 shares of Common Stock voted against and holders of 3,050 shares of Common Stock abstained from voting on the acceptance of the 2003 Director Stock Option Plan.
3. The stockholders ratified the selection of BDO Seidman LLP as our independent public accountants for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2004. Holders of 23,347,098 shares of Common Stock voted for, holders of 11,100 shares of Common Stock voted against and holders of 2,300 shares of Common Stock abstained from voting on the ratification of BDO Seidman LLP as our independent public accountants.
Item 5. Other Information
In June 2003, we entered into a Contract Manufacturing Agreement, a Loan Agreement and a Pledge Agreement with 3BY. The information included in Note 4 to the unaudited, consolidated financial statements furnished under Part I, Item 1 herein, and the information included in Part I, Item 2 under the caption Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations is hereby incorporated by reference.
On August 6, 2003, we entered into the Medtronic Agreement, which became effective on September 19, 2003. Under the Medtronic Agreement, we have granted Medtronic Xomed exclusive rights to distribute our ENT EndoSheaths and ENT endoscopes to ENT practitioners in the United States and Canada. The information included in Part I, Item 2 under the caption Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations is hereby incorporated by reference.
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) Exhibits
10.1 Exclusive Distribution Agreement, dated August 6, 2003, by and between the Registrant and Medtronic Xomed, Inc.
31 Rule 13a-14(c)/15d-14(c) Certifications
32 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
None.
25
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
VISION-SCIENCES, INC.
|
|
||
|
|
||
Date: November 14, 2003 |
/s/ Ron Hadani |
|
|
|
Ron Hadani |
||
|
President, CEO (Duly Authorized Officer) |
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
Date: November 14, 2003 |
/s/ James A. Tracy |
|
|
|
James A. Tracy |
||
|
Vice President Finance,
Chief Financial Officer and |
||
26