UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-Q

 

 

Commission file number 001-16047

 

Advanced Power Technology, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

405 SW Columbia Street, Bend, Oregon  97702

(Address of principal executive offices and Zip Code)

 

(541) 382-8028

(Registrant’s telephone number)

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to the filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes ý    No o

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o  No ý

 

 

The number of shares of the Registrant’s Common Stock outstanding as of July 31, 2003 was 10,412,007 shares.

 

 

ADVANCED POWER TECHNOLOGY, INC.

FORM 10-Q

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

Part I		Financial Information
	Item 1.	Financial Statements:
		Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002
		Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002
		Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002
		Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
	Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
	Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk
	Item 4.	Controls and Procedures
Part II		Other Information
	Item 1.	Legal Proceedings
	Item 6.	Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
		Signature
		Certifications
		Exhibits

 

2

 

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

ADVANCED POWER TECHNOLOGY, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

 (In thousands, except share amounts)

 

		June 30, 2003			December 31, 2002
		(unaudited)
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents		$	10,884		$	6,708
Short-term investments in available-for-sale securities		6,751			10,452
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $222 (2003) and $70 (2002)		7,375			6,899
Inventories, net		12,699			11,949
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		2,359			2,521
Total current assets		40,068			38,529
Property and equipment, net of accumulated amortization and depreciation of $12,961 (2003) and $11,410 (2002)		10,084			10,617
Long-term investments in available-for-sale securities		1,000			2,000
Other assets		111			109
Technology rights, net of accumulated amortization of $1,415 (2003) and $876 (2002)		9,349			9,887
Goodwill		15,570			15,806
Total assets		$	76,182		$	76,948
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable		$	3,416		$	2,873
Accrued expenses		2,128			2,475
Total current liabilities		5,544			5,348
Other long term liabilities		418			428
Total liabilities		5,962			5,776
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, par value $.001, 1,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding		—			—
Common stock, par value $.01, 19,000,000 shares authorized; 10,515,207 issued and 10,406,350 shares outstanding in 2003; 10,503,219 shares issued and 10,394,362 shares outstanding in 2002		105			105
Additional paid-in capital		88,507			88,490
Treasury stock, at cost, 108,857 shares		(1,700		)	(1,700		)
Deferred stock compensation		(84		)	(171		)
Accumulated other comprehensive income		238			166
Accumulated deficit		(16,846		)	(15,718		)
Total stockholders’ equity		70,220			71,172
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity		$	76,182		$	76,948

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

3

 

ADVANCED POWER TECHNOLOGY, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

 (In thousands, except per share amounts)

(Unaudited)

 

		Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
		2003			2002			2003			2002
Revenues, net		$	12,487		$	10,694		$	23,646		$	18,933
Cost of goods sold		7,777			7,074			15,529			12,686
Amortization of technology rights and other charges		280			565			564			957
Total cost of goods sold		8,057			7,639			16,093			13,643
Gross profit		4,430			3,055			7,553			5,290
Operating expenses:
Research and development		668			960			1,501			1,981
Selling, general and administrative		3,703			3,023			7,634			5,533
In-process research and development		—			211			—			2,108
Total operating expenses		4,371			4,194			9,135			9,622
Income (loss) from operations		59			(1,139		)	(1,582		)	(4,332		)
Interest income, net		52			162			108			381
Other expense, net		(145		)	(48		)	(134		)	(9		)
Loss before income tax expense (benefit)		(34		)	(1,025		)	(1,608		)	(3,960		)
Income tax expense (benefit)		85			(480		)	(480		)	(850		)
Net loss		$	(119	)	$	(545	)	$	(1,128	)	$	(3,110	)
Net loss per share:
Basic and diluted		$	(0.01	)	$	(0.05	)	$	(0.11	)	$	(0.31	)
Weighted average number of shares used in the computation of net loss per share:
Basic and diluted		10,404			10,356			10,402			10,105

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

4

 

ADVANCED POWER TECHNOLOGY, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

 

			Six Months Ended June 30,
			2003			2002
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss			$	(1,128	)	$	(3,110	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization			2,094			1,477
Inventory provisions			(35		)	170
Amortization of deferred stock compensation			87			276
Amortization of investment premium			14			77
Deferred gain on sale-leaseback			(8		)	(9		)
Non-cash charge for in-process research & development			—			2,108
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions:
Accounts receivable			(414		)	(1,267		)
Inventories			(632		)	1,523
Prepaid expenses and other assets			(86		)	1,570
Accounts payable and accrued expenses			645			155
Net cash provided by operating activities			537			2,970
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of available-for-sale securities			(1,000		)	(4,480		)
Proceeds from sale of available-for-sale securities			5,683			15,066
Payment for acquisitions, net of cash acquired			—			(26,569		)
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment			97			72
Purchase of property and equipment			(1,121		)	(1,013		)
Net cash (used) provided by investing activities			3,659			(16,924		)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Payments on capital lease obligations			(41		)	(36		)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options			17			342
Net cash (used) provided by financing activities			(24		)	306
Effects of exchange rate changes on cash			4			4
Net change in cash and cash equivalents			4,176			(13,644		)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period			6,708			16,102
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period			$	10,884		$	2,458
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash received (paid) during the period for:	Interest		$	(25	)	$	(38	)
	Income taxes		218			1,395
Supplemental disclosure of noncash activities:
Unrealized gain (loss) on short-term and long-term investments			$	(2	)	$	(42	)
Issuance of stock and options for acquisition of business			—			20,313

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

5

 

ADVANCED POWER TECHNOLOGY, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands, except share amounts)

(unaudited)

 

Note 1. Basis of Presentation

 

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements include normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of Advanced Power Technology, Inc.’s (APT) interim results.  The consolidated financial statements and notes in this Form 10-Q are presented as permitted by Regulation S-X, and as such, they do not contain certain information included in APT’s 2002 annual consolidated financial statements and notes.  This Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with APT’s consolidated financial statements and notes included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.  The financial information as of December 31, 2002 is derived from the audited consolidated financial statements as filed with APT’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.  The results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003 are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the entire fiscal year ending December 31, 2003.

 

APT’s financial quarters are 13 week periods. The second quarter of 2003 ended on June 29 and the second quarter of 2002 ended on June 30.  For convenience, the second quarters of 2003 and 2002 are both shown as ended on June 30.

 

Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

 

(a) Revenue Recognition, Sales Returns and Allowances

 

The balances and changes in reserve for warranties and sales returns for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 are as follows:

 

		Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
		2003			2002			2003			2002
Balance – beginning of period		$	289		$	519		$	351		$	365
Fair value of acquisition related balance		—			75			—			133
Provisions		337			304			581			591
Charge offs		(251		)	(378		)	(557		)	(569		)
Balance – end of period		$	375		$	520		$	375		$	520

 

(b) Stock-Based Compensation

 

APT has elected to continue to apply the prescribed accounting in Opinion 25 and provide the required disclosures per SFAS 123 and SFAS 148. APT accounts for equity instruments issued to non-employees in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123 and Emerging Issues Task Force consensus on Issue No. 96-18, “Accounting for Equity Instruments that are Issued to Other than Employees, for Acquiring or in Conjunction with Selling Goods or Services.”

 

6

 

Had APT determined compensation cost based on the fair value at the grant date for its stock options under SFAS 123, APT’s net loss would have been the pro forma amounts indicated in the table below.

 

		Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
		2003			2002			2003			2002
Net loss:
As reported		$	(119	)	$	(545	)	$	(1,128	)	$	(3,110	)
Add: Stock based compensation included in reported net loss, net of related tax effects		40			130			88			276
Deduct: Stock based compensation determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects		(440		)	(568		)	(879		)	(1,122		)
Pro forma net loss		$	(519	)	$	(983	)	$	(1,919	)	$	(3,956	)
Loss per share:
Basic and diluted – as reported		$	(0.01	)	$	(0.05	)	$	(0.11	)	$	(0.31	)
Basic and diluted – pro forma		$	(0.05	)	$	(0.10	)	$	(0.18	)	$	(0.39	)

 

The effects of applying SFAS 123 in this pro forma disclosure are not indicative of future amounts and additional awards are anticipated in future years.

 

The fair value of the compensation costs reflected in the above pro forma amounts was determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and the weighted average assumptions as follows:

 

		2003		2002
Risk-free interest rate		2.6-2.9	%	3.8	%
Expected dividend yield		0	%	0	%
Expected life		5 years		5 years
Volatility		100	%	100	%

 

(c) Net Income (Loss) Per Share

 

Basic net income (loss) per share is computed using the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period. Diluted net income per share is computed using the weighted average number of shares of common stock and dilutive potential common shares related to stock options and warrants outstanding during the period.  Anti-dilutive potential common shares are excluded from the diluted net income share calculation.  Dilutive net loss per share excludes all potential common shares from the calculation as the impact would be anti-dilutive.

 

7

 

There were no incremental dilutive shares included in the calculation of diluted net loss per share because the impact would be anti-dilutive. Incremental anti-dilutive shares that were excluded from the calculation of diluted net loss per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 are summarized in the following table.

 

		Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
		2003		2002		2003		2002
Anti-dilutive shares excluded from diluted net loss per share calculation		1,233,000		852,000		1,205,000		906,000

 

Note 3. Comprehensive Income (loss)

 

Comprehensive income (loss) is the total of net income (loss) and all other non-owner changes in equity. Comprehensive income (loss)  includes foreign currency translations and unrealized gains and losses from investments, as presented in the following table.

 

		Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
		2003			2002			2003			2002
Net loss		$	(119	)	$	(545	)	$	(1,128	)	$	(3,110	)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Unrealized loss on available for sale securities		—			(7		)	(2		)	(42		)
Foreign currency translation adjustment		49			111			74			102
Comprehensive loss		$	(70	)	$	(441	)	$	(1,056	)	$	(3,050	)

 

Note 4. Inventories, net

 

 

Note 5. Acquisitions

 

(a) GHz Technology, Inc.

 

On January 25, 2002, APT acquired all of the outstanding shares and stock options of GHz Technology, Inc. (GHz), in exchange for cash, APT common stock, and APT stock options.  The company was renamed Advanced Power Technology RF, Inc. (APTRF).  The GHz assets acquired included approximately $205 in cash and $7,656 in marketable securities.  The transaction was accounted for by the purchase method of accounting, in accordance with SFAS 141, “Business Combinations” and SFAS 142.  APT obtained a third party valuation study to estimate the fair

 

8

 

value of the acquired intangible assets.  APT began to consolidate the financial results of GHz on January 25, 2002 and forward.

 

(b)                               Microsemi RF Products, Inc.

 

On May 24, 2002, APT acquired the product lines and certain assets of Microsemi RF Products, Inc. (MSC RF), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Microsemi Corporation, for $12,200 in cash.  The company was renamed Advanced Power Technology RF Pennsylvania, Inc. (APTRF-PA).  The transaction was accounted for by the purchase method of accounting, in accordance with SFAS 141 and SFAS 142. APT obtained a third party valuation study to estimate the fair value of the acquired intangible assets.  APT began to consolidate the financial results of the acquired business on May 24, 2002 and forward

 

(c)                                Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Results

 

The following table reflects the unaudited combined results of APT, GHz, and MSC RF as if the acquisitions had taken place as of January 1, 2002.  The pro forma information includes non-cash charges for amortization of technology rights, inventory fair value adjustments, depreciation and deferred compensation related to the acquisitions, consistent with generally accepted accounting principles.  The period excludes a charge of $1,897 for in-process research and development expense.  The pro forma information does not necessarily reflect the actual results that would have occurred if the companies had been combined during the period nor is it necessarily indicative of future results of operations for the combined companies.

 

 

Note 8. SEGMENT INFORMATION

 

APT operates in one segment and is engaged in the manufacture and marketing of high-performance power semiconductors and modules for switching and RF applications.

 

Note 9. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

 

From time to time the Company is involved in various legal matters that arise out of the ordinary conduct of its business, including those related to litigation over intellectual property rights, commercial transactions, contracts and environmental matters.  The Company is currently involved in various legal proceedings.  The Company does not believe that the ultimate resolution of such litigation will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.  However, the length of time and legal fees associated with the patent litigation with IXYS may be significant. The Company accrues loss contingencies in connection with its litigation when it is probable that a loss has occurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated.

 

9

 

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

This discussion and analysis is intended to be read in conjunction with Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.

 

Forward-looking Statements and Risk Factors Affecting Business and Results of Operations

 

All statements and trend analyses contained in this item and elsewhere in this report on Form 10-Q relative to the future constitute “forward-looking” statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-statements are subject to the business and economic risks faced by us and our actual results of operations may differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements. In addition, results of operations for the periods discussed below should not be considered indicative of the results to be expected in any future period and fluctuations in operating results might result in fluctuations in the market price of our common stock. Our quarterly and annual operating results may vary significantly depending on many factors, including but not limited to the ability of subcontractors to meet their delivery commitments; unfavorable changes in industry and competitive conditions; our mix of product shipments; the accuracy of our customer’s forecasts; the effectiveness of our efforts to control and reduce costs; the cost and liability associated with patent infringement litigation; and other risks detailed in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Risk Factors Affecting Business and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

Overview

 

We are a leading designer, manufacturer and marketer of high-performance power semiconductors and modules for both switching and RF applications. Power semiconductors manage and regulate electrical power by converting electricity into a form required by electrical and electronic products. Our power semiconductors increase system efficiency, permit the design of more compact end products and improve features and functionality. We are primarily focused on the high power, high frequency segment of the power semiconductor market. High power refers to the ability to dissipate above one kilowatt, and high frequency refers to the ability to switch on and off at rates above 100 kilohertz. In addition we have strengthened our portfolio of RF products that operate at frequencies ranging from 1 megahertz to 100 megahertz. RF generally refers to the ability to operate at frequencies above 1 megahertz. We sell our products primarily in North America, Europe, and Asia, through a network of independent sales representatives and distributors. Our common stock is listed on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol APTI.

 

To further our penetration in RF markets, we completed the acquisition of GHz Technology, Inc. and the business of Microsemi RF Products, Inc. in January 2002 and May 2002, respectively.  These acquisitions are part of the Company’s ongoing strategy to expand its product and technology portfolio in the RF power arena through both internal development and acquisitions.  We believe that these acquisitions serve to position APT as an emerging, dominant supplier in bipolar RF power transistors for avionics, radar and non-cellular communications applications.  These acquisitions have added valuable RF technology and substantial RF engineering, manufacturing and marketing capability to the Company.

 

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements provided under Part II, Item 8 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K. Certain statements contained herein may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements involve a number of risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially, as discussed more fully herein.

 

10

 

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

 

Advanced Power Technology’s discussion and analysis of its financial condition and results of operations are based upon consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires APT to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, APT evaluates its estimates, including those related to product returns and warranty obligations, allowance for doubtful accounts, excess and obsolete inventories, income taxes, valuation of intangible assets including goodwill, valuation of long-lived assets, contingencies and litigation, and excess component order cancellation costs. APT bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

 

APT believes the following critical accounting policies affect its more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements.

 

Product Returns and Warranty Obligations

 

Product revenue is recognized upon shipment of product. In general, APT provides for a one-year repair or replacement warranty on its products. Upon shipment, APT provides for the estimated cost that may be incurred for product warranty and sales returns based on historical experience. APT uses independent distributors to sell some of its products. Distributors can return up to 5% of the dollar value of products purchased during the prior six months and receive certain price protections on purchased products. Sales to distributors are recognized upon shipment, less an allowance for estimated returns based on historical experience.

 

While the Company engages in extensive product quality programs and processes, including actively monitoring and evaluating the quality of its component suppliers, APT’s warranty obligation is affected by product non-conformance rates, material usage and service delivery costs incurred in correcting a product non-conformance. Should actual product non-conformance rates, material usage, service delivery costs, or distributor returns differ from APT’s estimates, revisions to the estimated warranty liability would be required.

 

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

 

APT maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of its customers to make required payments. Management regularly reviews the adequacy of the allowance after considering the size of the accounts receivable balance, historical bad debts, the customer’s expected ability to pay and our collection history with each customer. Management reviews significant individual accounts that are past due to determine whether an allowance should be made based on these factors.  If the financial condition of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required.

 

Excess and Obsolete Inventories

 

 Inventories are stated at the lower of standard cost (approximates actual cost on a first-in, first-out basis) or market (net realizable value).  APT establishes reserves for estimated unmarketable (excess) or obsolete inventory equal to the difference between the cost of inventory and the estimated net realizable value based upon assumptions about future demand and market conditions. APT evaluates historical usage of the product, current customer demand, and forecasted usage of the product.  If actual market conditions are less favorable than those projected by management, additional inventory reserves may be required.

 

11

 

Income Taxes

 

APT records a valuation allowance to reduce its deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. While APT considers future taxable income and ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in assessing the need for the valuation allowance, in the event APT were to determine that it would be able to realize its deferred tax assets in the future in excess of its net recorded amount, an adjustment to the deferred tax asset would increase income in the period such determination was made. Likewise, should APT determine that it would not be able to realize all or part of its net deferred tax asset in the future, an adjustment to the deferred tax asset would be charged to income in the period such determination was made.

 

Valuation of Goodwill and Intangible Assets with Indefinite Lives

 

APT values goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. (SFAS) 142 “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.”  Currently APT carries a goodwill balance in connection with acquisitions made in 2002, but has no other intangible assets with indefinite lives.  We annually review goodwill and other intangible assets that have indefinite lives for impairment and when events or circumstances indicate the carrying value of these assets might exceed their current fair values. We determine fair value using discounted cash flow analysis and other acceptable valuation methodologies, which requires us to make certain assumptions and estimates regarding industry economic factors and future profitability.  It is our policy to conduct impairment testing based on our most current business plans, which reflect changes we anticipate in the economy and industry.  If actual results are not consistent with our assumptions and judgments, we could be exposed to a material impairment charge as a result of writing down the carrying value of goodwill or intangible assets with indefinite lives.

 

Valuation of Long-Lived Assets

 

APT values goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives in accordance with SFAS 144 “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.” We evaluate our long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable.  We determine the potential impairment using undiscounted cash flow analysis, which requires us to make certain assumptions and estimates regarding industry economic factors and future profitability.  It is our policy to conduct impairment testing based on our most current business plans, which reflect changes we anticipate in the economy and industry.  If actual results are not consistent with our assumptions and judgments, we could be exposed to a material impairment charge, as a result of writing down the carrying value of intangible assets.

 

Contingencies and Litigation

 

APT is subject to the possibility of various loss contingencies arising in the ordinary course of business.  We consider the likelihood of loss or impairment of an asset or the incurrence of a liability, as well as our ability to reasonably estimate the amount of loss in determining loss contingencies.  An estimated loss contingency is accrued when it is probable that an asset has been impaired or a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated.  We regularly evaluate current information available to us to determine whether such accruals should be adjusted.

 

12

 

Results of Operations

 

The following table presents our consolidated statement of operations data for the periods indicated as a percentage of net revenue:

 

		Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
		2003		2002		2003		2002
Revenues, net		100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%
Cost of goods sold		62.3		66.1		65.7		67.0
Amortization of technology rights and other charges		2.2		5.3		2.4		5.1
Total cost of goods sold		64.5		71.4		68.1		72.1
Gross profit		35.5		28.6		31.9		27.9
Operating expenses:
Research and development		5.3		9.0		6.3		10.5
Selling, general and administrative		29.7		28.3		32.3		29.2
In-process research and development		—		2.0		—		11.1
Total operating expenses		35.0		39.3		38.6		50.8
Income (loss) from operations		0.5		(10.7	)	(6.7	)	(22.9	)
Interest income and other expense, net		(0.8	)	1.1		(0.1	)	2.0
Loss before income tax expense (benefit)		(0.3	)	(9.6	)	(6.8	)	(20.9	)
Income tax expense (benefit)		0.7		(4.5	)	(2.0	)	(4.5	)
Net loss		(1.0	)%	(5.1	)%	(4.8	)%	(16.4	)%

 

Revenues.  Revenues for the second quarter of 2003 were $12.5 million, up 16.8% from $10.7 million in the second quarter of 2002. Excluding the acquisition of the business of Microsemi RF Products Inc., which was completed on May 24, 2002, second quarter 2003 revenues were up 7.3% over the year ago quarter.  On a before acquisition basis, the increase in revenues over the prior year quarter is primarily attributable to higher sales to the industrial/medical due to our MRI and implantable business and military/aerospace markets due to our products for commercial aviations systems in Europe and the U.S.

 

Revenues for the first six months of 2003 were $23.6 million, up 24.9% from $18.9 million in the first six months of 2002.  Excluding the acquisition of the business of Microsemi RF Products Inc., which was completed on May 24, 2002, revenues increased by 10.7%.  The increase over the prior year six months is attributable to stronger sales across each of the markets that we serve.

 

Sales to distributors were approximately 25% of revenues in the second quarter of 2003, compared to 21% for the total year 2002.  We monitor inventory levels at our distributors on a monthly basis.  Sales of our higher margin RF products represented approximately 52% in the second quarter of 2003 compared to 45% in the second quarter of 2002.

 

Gross Profit.  Gross profit for the second quarter of 2003 was 35.5% compared to 28.6% in the second quarter of 2002. Excluding acquisition related non-cash purchase accounting adjustments for the fair value of inventory acquired and the amortization of the technology rights asset, gross profit was 37.7% for the second quarter of 2003 compared to 33.9% in the second quarter of 2002 and 30.5% in the first quarter of 2003.  The improvement in our gross profit margin over the year ago quarter and the prior quarter is due to: higher fixed cost absorption at both our Bend, Oregon and Santa Clara, California facilities; a greater percentage of higher margin RF products in our second quarter 2003 revenues; and the benefit of cost reduction initiatives we have undertaken including the reduction of personnel costs, controlled discretionary spending, and reduction of facilities related charges.

 

Gross profit margin for the six months of 2003 was 31.9% compared to 27.9% in the first six months of 2002. Excluding the acquisition related purchase accounting adjustments for the fair value of inventory acquired and the amortization of the technology rights asset, gross profit was 34.3% for the first six months of 2003 compared to

 

13

 

33.0% for the first six months of 2002. The increase in gross profit margin is primarily due to the higher RF product content of our sales mix in 2003 versus 2002.  Overall factory utilization was improved at our Bend, Oregon and Santa Clara, California facilities in the period, but was partially offset by the low fixed cost absorption at our Montgomeryville, Pennsylvania operation which we acquired May 24, 2002.  In order to reduce our production costs, the company is implementing a consolidation of the Pennsylvania wafer fab operations to our Bend, Oregon facility as well as programs to greater utilize lower cost offshore assembly subcontractors with corresponding downsizing of internal assembly operations.

 

Research and Development Expense.  Second quarter of 2003 research and development expenses were $668,000 or 5.3% of revenues, compared to $960,000 in the second quarter of 2002, or 9.0% of revenues.  Research and development expenses in the first six months of 2003 and 2002 were $1.5 million and $2.0 million or 6.3% and 10.5% of revenues, respectively.  The decrease in second quarter spending over the prior year quarter is primarily due to lower expenditures for supplies and materials. Spending in the first quarter of 2003 was higher due to supporting the introduction of a number of new products, especially for our Power MOS7® technology. The Company plans to continue its research and development programs leading to the introduction of new products for use in both switching and RF applications. The decrease in the percentage of revenue is also due to our higher revenue levels in 2003.

 

Selling, General and Administrative Expense.  Second quarter of 2003 selling, general, and administrative expenses were $3.7 million or 29.7% of revenues, compared to $3.0 million in the second quarter of 2002, or 28.3% of revenues.  Selling, general, and administrative expenses in the first six months of 2003 and 2002 was $7.6 million and $5.5 million or 32.3% and 29.2% of revenues, respectively.  The increase in expenses over the prior year quarter is attributable to higher payroll costs as a result of the discontinuance of the graduated pay reductions we implemented in 2001 and the first half of 2002, as well as additional personnel in selling, general and administrative functions due to new hires and to transferring of job functions from other functional areas of the Company.  In addition we had increased legal expenses in connection with the ongoing patent litigation, as more fully explained in Part II, Item 1 to this filing. We have denied infringement of the IXYS patents and have asserted affirmative defenses to our claims.  However, the length of time and legal fees associated with the patent litigation with IXYS may be significant. The increase in expenses for the first six months of 2003 over the first six months of 2002 is attributable to the same reasons as above and to the incremental spending at the subsidiaries we acquired at the end of January and May of 2002, including a $240,000 severance charge in the first quarter of 2003 due to an organizational restructuring.

 

Interest income and other expense, net.  Interest income and other expense, net, which includes interest income, interest expense and other expense, was a net expense of $93,000 in the second quarter of 2003 compared to a net income of $114,000 in the second quarter of 2002.  The primary component is interest income earned on our cash and marketable securities.  Net interest income was $52,000 in the second quarter of 2003 compared to $162,000 in the second quarter of 2002.  The decline in interest income is primarily due to lower interest rates available in the current investment market and a lower investment balance due to cash used for the acquisitions we made in 2002.  The net expense of $145,000 incurred in the second quarter of 2003 includes $102,000 of estimated accrued cost related to a small fire at our Montgomeryville, Pennsylvania facility.  We have insurance which covers this type of damage and expect to recover most of the accrued loss through our insurance claims proceeds. This will be recorded as a gain at the time of the receipt of any insurance proceeds.

 

Income Tax Expense (Benefit).  We recorded a tax expense in the second quarter of 2003 of $85,000 on a loss before tax of $34,000 for a negative 250% effective tax rate.  The reason for the recording of a tax expense on a net loss is due to the mix of our profit (loss) before tax between United States (U.S.) and foreign tax jurisdictions.  We recorded a profit before tax within the U.S. and a loss outside of the U.S.  In addition, due to loss carry forward positions outside of the U.S., we have not recorded any additional tax benefit for the foreign loss incurred, as we recorded an increase in our valuation allowance for the tax effect of the foreign loss.  Our effective tax rate for the first six months of 2003 is 29.9%, which is lower than the statutory rate also due to the mix of our profit (loss) before tax between the U.S. and foreign jurisdictions.  We recorded a tax benefit of $480,000 in the second quarter of 2002, at an effective tax rate of 46.8%.  The effective tax rate in the first six months of 2002 was approximately 21.5%. The second quarter and year to date tax rate benefit in 2002 is greater than the expected tax rate benefit primarily due

 

14

 

to the benefit of a reduction in the valuation allowance due to the realization of foreign net operating loss carry forwards.

 

Valuation of Goodwill and Intangible Assets with Finite Lives. Consistent with GAAP, goodwill and intangible assets are carried on the Company’s balance sheet at fair value at acquisition and reviewed at least annually for impairment or when other indications of potential impairment are present.  Due to recent stock market and economic conditions, the Company performed an interim impairment analysis in the second quarter of 2003. The results of this analysis indicated that as of June 30, 2003 there was no impairment to the Company’s goodwill or intangible assets. The Company will continue to monitor the balance of our goodwill and intangible assets and assess the amounts for impairment at least on an annual basis.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

In the first six months of 2003, we generated approximately $537,000 from operating activities.  This primarily resulted from our net loss of $1.1 million and a negative cash flow from operating assets and liabilities of $488,000, offset by non-cash charges for depreciation and amortization of $2.2 million.

 

In the first six months of 2003, we generated $3.7 million from investing activities, which consisted mainly of net proceeds from the sale of available-for-sale securities of $4.7 million, offset by purchases of $1.1 million of fixed assets.  Our purchases of fixed assets were for technology infrastructure and facility and equipment expenditures at our Bend facility in support of the consolidation of wafer fab operations from our Pennsylvania facility to Bend.

 

In the first six months of 2003, we used approximately $24,000 in financing activities, which primarily consisted of the payment of capital lease obligations of $41,000 offset by the net proceeds of $17,000 from the exercise of stock options.

 

As of June 30, 2003 APT had $34.5 million in working capital.  Our trade accounts receivable balance was $7.4 million reflecting a days sales outstanding ratio of 53 days, compared to trade accounts receivable of $6.9 million at December 31, 2002, reflecting a days sales outstanding ratio of 63 days.  Our inventory balance was $12.7 million reflecting inventory turns of 2.6 times per year, compared to an inventory balance of $11.9 million at December 31, 2002, reflecting inventory turns of 2.8 times per year. The calculations above are based on quarterly average balances of trade accounts receivable and inventory and annualized quarterly sales and cost of goods sold.

 

APT currently expects to fund expenditures for capital requirements as well as liquidity needs from a combination of available cash balances, internally generated funds and financing arrangements if needed. As of June 30, 2003, APT had $18.6 million in cash and cash equivalents and available-for-sale securities. APT’s investment policy is to invest in short term, high-grade liquid investments with the goal of capital preservation. APT’s ability to generate positive cash flow from operations may be affected by market conditions as well as other risk factors as described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002. We expect from time to time to evaluate potential acquisitions and equity investments complementary to our market strategy. To the extent we pursue such transactions, we could require additional equity or debt financing to fund such activities or to fund our working capital requirements in the event of an industry downturn or an unexpected adverse change in our business operations. To the extent we require additional capital, we cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain such financing on terms favorable to us, or at all.

 

15

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

In June 2002, the FASB issued SFAS 146 - “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities.” SFAS 146 addresses accounting and reporting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities and nullifies Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 94-3, “Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (Including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring).” SFAS 146 requires that a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized and measured initially at fair value when the liability is incurred. SFAS 146 is effective for exit or disposal activities that are initiated after December 31, 2002, with early application encouraged.  The adoption of the new rule is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s statements of position, operations or cash flows.

 

In November, 2002, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 45 - “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others” (“FIN 45”). This interpretation elaborates on the disclosures to be made by a guarantor in its interim and annual financial statements about its obligations under certain guarantees that it has issued and requires that they be recorded at fair value. The initial recognition and measurement provisions of this interpretation are to be applied only on a prospective basis to guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002. The disclosure requirements of this interpretation are effective for financial statements of interim or annual periods ending after December 15, 2002. The adoption of the new rule is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s statements of position, operations or cash flows.

 

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK

 

We do not use derivative financial instruments in our investment portfolio. Due to the short duration and conservative nature of our cash equivalents, and the high quality and conservative nature of our long-term investments, we do not expect any material loss with respect to our investment portfolio.

 

Currently less than 2% of our sales are transacted in local currencies, primarily Euros. As a result, our international results of operations have limited exposure to foreign exchange rate fluctuations. We do not currently hedge against foreign currency rate fluctuations. Most of our export sales and sales by APT Europe are in U.S. dollars, and most of our foreign currency sales are from operations with significant expenses in the same currency. As a result, gains and losses from such fluctuations have not been material to our consolidated results of operations.

 

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

 

(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.

 

As required by new Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. In connection with the new rules, we currently are in the process of further reviewing and documenting our disclosure controls and procedures, including our internal controls over financial reporting, and may from time to time make changes aimed at enhancing their effectiveness and to ensure that our systems evolve with our business.

 

Based on our most recent evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, the Company did not discover:

 

(a) Any significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;

 

16

 

(b) Any instances of fraud, whether or not material, that involved management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

(b) Changes in internal controls

 

None.

 

PART II.  OTHER INFORMATION

 

ITEM 1.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

 

On August 15, 2002, IXYS Corporation filed a patent infringement lawsuit against APT in the United States District Court, Northern District of California.  The claim filed by IXYS alleges that APT infringes their United States Patent No. 5,486,715 and 5,801,419.  The IXYS claim also requested that damages be determined at trial and that such damages be trebled. On October 1, 2002, APT filed its Answer to the IXYS allegations of patent infringement setting forth several affirmative defenses related to the validity of the IXYS patents.  In addition, APT filed a patent infringement counterclaim against IXYS, alleging that IXYS infringes APT United States Patent No. 5,283,202, entitled “IGBT Device With Platinum Lifetime Control Having Gradient Or Profile Tailored Platinum Diffusion Regions.”  In addition, APT does not believe that it infringes the IXYS patents cited in the claim.  APT plans to vigorously defend itself in this lawsuit.

 

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

 

(a) The exhibits filed as part of this report are listed below:

 

 

(b) Reports on Form 8-K

 

Date of Report		Date Filed		Description
April 23, 2003		April 28, 2003		Earnings release for first quarter 2003 financial results.

 

17

 

SIGNATURE

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized this 11^th day of August, 2003

 

 

		ADVANCED POWER TECHNOLOGY, INC.
		By:	/s/ GREG M. HAUGEN
		Greg M. Haugen
		Vice President, Finance and Administration,
		Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
		(Principal Financial Officer)

 

18