UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
ý |
|
Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, |
For the quarterly period ended June 27, 2003
or
o |
|
Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, |
For the transition period from _____ to _____
Commission file number 0-8771
EVANS & SUTHERLAND COMPUTER CORPORATION
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Utah |
|
87-0278175 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of |
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
|
|
|
600 Komas Drive, Salt Lake City, Utah |
|
84108 |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
|
|
|
Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code: (801) 588-1000 |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No ý
The number of shares of the registrants Common Stock (par value $0.20 per share) outstanding at August 1, 2003, was 10,474,955.
FORM 10-Q
Evans & Sutherland Computer Corporation
Quarter Ended June 27, 2003
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 27, 2003, and December 31, 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EVANS & SUTHERLAND COMPUTER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share amounts)
|
|
June 27, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
|
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash |
|
$ |
9,709 |
|
$ |
7,375 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
770 |
|
2,960 |
|
||
Accounts receivable, less allowances for doubtful receivables of $644 at June 27, 2003, and $856 at December 31, 2002 |
|
20,604 |
|
22,481 |
|
||
Inventories |
|
18,657 |
|
31,373 |
|
||
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts |
|
13,077 |
|
22,083 |
|
||
Prepaid expenses and deposits |
|
4,212 |
|
4,487 |
|
||
Assets held for sale |
|
2,463 |
|
5,793 |
|
||
Total current assets |
|
69,492 |
|
96,552 |
|
||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
25,199 |
|
28,288 |
|
||
Investments |
|
1,625 |
|
2,002 |
|
||
Other assets |
|
438 |
|
734 |
|
||
Total assets |
|
$ |
96,754 |
|
$ |
127,576 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Liabilities and stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
$ |
4 |
|
$ |
53 |
|
Line of credit agreements |
|
2,929 |
|
5,213 |
|
||
Accounts payable |
|
7,930 |
|
9,671 |
|
||
Accrued expenses |
|
13,609 |
|
13,093 |
|
||
Customer deposits |
|
3,768 |
|
1,507 |
|
||
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts |
|
6,494 |
|
11,022 |
|
||
Total current liabilities |
|
34,734 |
|
40,559 |
|
||
Long-term debt |
|
20,815 |
|
20,685 |
|
||
Pension and retirement obligations |
|
13,255 |
|
12,969 |
|
||
Total liabilities |
|
68,804 |
|
74,213 |
|
||
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Redeemable preferred stock, class B-1, no par value; authorized 1,500,000 shares; no issued and outstanding shares |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Common stock, $0.20 par value; authorized 30,000,000 shares; issued 10,824,941 shares at June 27, 2003, and 10,806,040 shares at December 31, 2002 |
|
2,165 |
|
2,161 |
|
||
Additional paid-in-capital |
|
49,508 |
|
49,413 |
|
||
Common stock in treasury, at cost; 352,500 shares |
|
(4,709 |
) |
(4,709 |
) |
||
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit) |
|
(18,763 |
) |
6,840 |
|
||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
(251 |
) |
(342 |
) |
||
Total stockholders equity |
|
27,950 |
|
53,363 |
|
||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
96,754 |
|
$ |
127,576 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
EVANS & SUTHERLAND COMPUTER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
June 27, |
|
June 28, |
|
||
|
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
||
Sales |
|
$ |
22,196 |
|
$ |
34,221 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
13,558 |
|
22,038 |
|
||
Gross profit |
|
8,638 |
|
12,183 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Selling, general and administrative |
|
6,906 |
|
7,478 |
|
||
Research and development |
|
5,093 |
|
6,646 |
|
||
Restructuring charges |
|
|
|
1,921 |
|
||
Operating expenses |
|
11,999 |
|
16,045 |
|
||
|
|
(3,361 |
) |
(3,862 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Gain on assets held for sale |
|
1,406 |
|
|
|
||
Gain on curtailment of pension plan |
|
|
|
3,575 |
|
||
Operating loss |
|
(1,955 |
) |
(287 |
) |
||
Other expense, net |
|
(498 |
) |
(362 |
) |
||
Loss before income taxes |
|
(2,453 |
) |
(649 |
) |
||
Income tax expense |
|
119 |
|
75 |
|
||
Net loss |
|
$ |
(2,572 |
) |
$ |
(724 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net loss per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Basic and diluted |
|
$ |
(0.25 |
) |
$ |
(0.07 |
) |
Weighted average common and common equivalent shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Basic and diluted |
|
10,469 |
|
10,424 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
EVANS & SUTHERLAND COMPUTER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
June 27, |
|
June 28, |
|
||
|
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
||
Sales |
|
$ |
44,889 |
|
$ |
66,784 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
27,428 |
|
45,007 |
|
||
Inventory impairment |
|
14,566 |
|
|
|
||
Gross profit |
|
2,895 |
|
21,777 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Selling, general and administrative |
|
14,163 |
|
14,051 |
|
||
Research and development |
|
12,123 |
|
13,027 |
|
||
Restructuring charges |
|
1,279 |
|
1,921 |
|
||
Impairment loss |
|
1,151 |
|
|
|
||
Operating expenses |
|
28,716 |
|
28,999 |
|
||
|
|
(25,821 |
) |
(7,222 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Gain on assets held for sale |
|
1,406 |
|
|
|
||
Gain on curtailment of pension plan |
|
|
|
3,575 |
|
||
Gain on sale of business unit |
|
|
|
96 |
|
||
Operating loss |
|
(24,415 |
) |
(3,551 |
) |
||
Other expense, net |
|
(1,338 |
) |
(970 |
) |
||
Loss before income taxes |
|
(25,753 |
) |
(4,521 |
) |
||
Income tax benefit |
|
(149 |
) |
(608 |
) |
||
Net loss |
|
$ |
(25,604 |
) |
$ |
(3,913 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net loss per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Basic and diluted |
|
$ |
(2.45 |
) |
$ |
(0.38 |
) |
Weighted average common and common equivalent shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Basic and diluted |
|
10,464 |
|
10,410 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
EVANS & SUTHERLAND COMPUTER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
June 27, |
|
June 28, |
|
||
|
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
||
Net loss |
|
$ |
(2,572 |
) |
$ |
(724 |
) |
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Unrealized gain (loss) on securities |
|
65 |
|
(39 |
) |
||
Other comprehensive income (loss) before income taxes |
|
65 |
|
(39 |
) |
||
Income tax expense related to items of other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of income taxes |
|
65 |
|
(39 |
) |
||
Comprehensive loss |
|
$ |
(2,507 |
) |
$ |
(763 |
) |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
June 27, |
|
June 28, |
|
||
|
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
||
Net loss |
|
$ |
(25,604 |
) |
$ |
(3,913 |
) |
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Unrealized gain (loss) on securities |
|
92 |
|
(10 |
) |
||
Other comprehensive income (loss) before income taxes |
|
92 |
|
(10 |
) |
||
Income tax expense related to items of other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of income taxes |
|
92 |
|
(10 |
) |
||
Comprehensive loss |
|
$ |
(25,512 |
) |
$ |
(3,923 |
) |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
EVANS & SUTHERLAND COMPUTER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
June 27, |
|
June 28, |
|
||
|
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net loss |
|
$ |
(25,604 |
) |
$ |
(3,913 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Depreciation & amortization |
|
3,689 |
|
4,999 |
|
||
Gain on sale of assets held for sale |
|
(1,406 |
) |
|
|
||
Gain on curtailment of pension plan |
|
|
|
(3,575 |
) |
||
Gain on sale of business unit |
|
|
|
(96 |
) |
||
Inventory impairment |
|
14,566 |
|
|
|
||
Impairment loss |
|
1,151 |
|
|
|
||
Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment |
|
16 |
|
76 |
|
||
Loss on write-down of investment |
|
500 |
|
|
|
||
Provisions for losses on accounts receivable |
|
16 |
|
679 |
|
||
Provision for write-down of inventories |
|
623 |
|
887 |
|
||
Provision for warranty expense |
|
1,488 |
|
341 |
|
||
Other |
|
53 |
|
110 |
|
||
Change in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Accounts receivable |
|
2,079 |
|
6,403 |
|
||
Inventories |
|
(1,186 |
) |
3,345 |
|
||
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts, net |
|
4,477 |
|
(1,730 |
) |
||
Prepaid expenses and deposits |
|
252 |
|
182 |
|
||
Accounts payable |
|
(1,741 |
) |
(446 |
) |
||
Accrued expenses |
|
(1,973 |
) |
(3,033 |
) |
||
Customer deposits |
|
2,261 |
|
(2,515 |
) |
||
Net cash provided by (used in) operations |
|
(739 |
) |
1,714 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Proceeds from sale of investment securities |
|
|
|
38 |
|
||
Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
|
(1,760 |
) |
(1,633 |
) |
||
Proceeds from sale of assets held for sale |
|
4,760 |
|
|
|
||
Increase in other assets |
|
|
|
(395 |
) |
||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
3,000 |
|
(1,990 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Borrowings from debt and line of credit agreements |
|
62,062 |
|
104,543 |
|
||
Payments of debt and line of credit agreements |
|
(64,265 |
) |
(106,333 |
) |
||
Decrease (increase) in restricted cash |
|
2,191 |
|
866 |
|
||
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
85 |
|
224 |
|
||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
73 |
|
(700 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net change in cash |
|
2,334 |
|
(976 |
) |
||
Cash at beginning of year |
|
7,375 |
|
8,717 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash at end of period |
|
$ |
9,709 |
|
$ |
7,741 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash paid during the year for: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Interest |
|
$ |
427 |
|
$ |
1,050 |
|
Income taxes |
|
180 |
|
77 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
7
EVANS & SUTHERLAND COMPUTER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
1. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Evans & Sutherland Computer Corporation have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and, therefore, do not include all information and footnotes necessary for a complete presentation of the results of operations, the financial position, and cash flows, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. This report on Form 10-Q for the three and six months ended June 27, 2003, should be read in conjunction with our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets, statements of operations, comprehensive loss, and cash flows reflect all normal recurring adjustments that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of our financial position, results of operations and cash flows. The results of operations for the interim three and six month periods ended June 27, 2003, are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.
Certain amounts in the 2002 condensed consolidated financial statements and notes have been reclassified to conform to the 2003 presentation.
2. INVENTORIES
Inventories consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
June 27, |
|
December
31, |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Raw materials |
|
$ |
1,265 |
|
$ |
14,250 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
10,922 |
|
10,467 |
|
||
Finished goods |
|
6,470 |
|
6,656 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
$ |
18,657 |
|
$ |
31,373 |
|
Inventory Impairment
During the first quarter of 2003 certain significant orders that we had expected to receive as of December 31, 2002, and into early 2003 were canceled by customers. We believe these cancellations were primarily the result of a re-alignment of military spending priorities during the first quarter of 2003. The future demand for our HarmonyÒ 1, ESIGÒ, and TargetViewÒ products significantly decreased compared to our prior projections because of these cancellations. As a result, during the quarter ended March 28, 2003, we recorded a $14.6 million impairment to specific inventory and a $1.2 million impairment to certain fixed assets related to the manufacture of these products.
We recorded approximately $10.0 million of impairment related to our Harmony 1 inventory. Through the end of 2002 and into early 2003, we expected to finalize a sale of two Harmony 1 systems, one as an option to a current U.S. government contract and another to a European prime contractor. During March 2003, we received notification from the U.S. customer that they would not purchase the Harmony 1 system, as had been forecasted, due to a decision to migrate to a more current technology, specifically commercial off-the-shelf PCs or our next-generation Harmony 2 product. Feedback from the European prime contractor was quite similar. Thus, the loss of these orders coupled with the overall shift in market demand resulted in our determination that we had excess Harmony 1 inventory on hand. We currently do not have other prospects to sell this excess Harmony 1 inventory, and these components cannot be used in the manufacture of other products. Accordingly, we determined that $10.0 million of inventory related to these systems was impaired. In addition, because we do not expect to sell any additional Harmony 1 systems, we determined we had no further need for certain fixed assets specifically used to
8
build, test, and demonstrate our Harmony 1 product. We recorded an additional impairment related to these fixed assets, as we believe this equipment has no alternative use.
We recorded approximately $3.3 million of impairment related to our ESIG inventory. Through the end of 2002 and into early 2003, we expected to finalize the sale of as many as nine ESIG systems to a particular commercial customer. During March of 2003, we received notification from this customer that they would not purchase the ESIG systems as had been forecasted due to their interest in our next-generation EPÔ-1000CT technology, which provides enhanced functionality at a comparable price. While we continue to manufacture certain ESIG systems for other customers under pre-existing purchase orders, the loss of this order, coupled with the increased demand for our next-generation EP-1000CT product, caused us to determine that we had inventory in excess of our current purchase orders and forecasted demand.
We recorded approximately $1.3 million of impairment related to our TargetView 100 inventory. In the first quarter of 2003, we had opportunities to propose TargetView 100 technology for a significant number of systems. During this timeframe, we discussed many potential solutions to the customers requirements and became convinced that the TargetView 100 technology had been superseded by newer technology. In light of this, our business opportunities for TargetView 100 systems have all but been eliminated and has resulted in our determination that we had excess inventory on hand. Accordingly, we determined that $1.3 million of inventory related to these systems was impaired.
3. DEBT
Included in long-term debt is approximately $18.0 million of 6% Convertible Subordinated Debentures due in 2012 (the 6% Debentures). The 6% Debentures are unsecured and are convertible at each bondholders option into shares of our common stock at a conversion price of $42.10 or 428,000 shares of our common stock subject to adjustment. The 6% Debentures are redeemable at our option, in whole or in part, at par.
In December 2002, we entered into a secured credit facility (the Foothill Facility) with Foothill Capital Corporation (Foothill) that provides for borrowings and the issuance of letters of credit up to $25.0 million. The Foothill Facility, among other things, (i) requires us to maintain certain financial ratios and covenants, including a minimum tangible net worth that adjusts each quarter, a minimum unbilled receivables to billed receivables ratio, and a limitation of $12.0 million of aggregate capital expenditures in any fiscal year; (ii) restricts our ability to incur debt or liens; sell, assign, pledge, or lease assets; or merge with another company; and (iii) restricts the payment of dividends and repurchase of any of our outstanding shares without the prior consent of Foothill. The Foothill Facility expires in December 2004.
Borrowings under the Foothill Facility bear interest at the Wells Fargo Bank National Association prevailing prime rate plus 1.5% to 3.0%, depending on the amount outstanding. In addition, the Foothill Facility has an unused line fee equal to 0.375% per annum times the difference between $25.0 million and the sum of the average undrawn portion of the borrowings, payable each quarter. The Foothill Facility provides Foothill with a first priority perfected security interest in substantially all of our assets, including, but not limited to, all of our intellectual property. Pursuant to the terms of the Foothill Facility, all cash receipts of E&S must be deposited into a Foothill controlled account.
As of the second quarter ended June 27, 2003, we were not in compliance with the tangible net worth financial covenant of our Foothill Facility. However, as described below, the Foothill Facility was amended on July 16, 2003, and July 25, 2003, and we then were in compliance with all covenants as of June 27, 2003. The outstanding balance owed to Foothill pursuant to the Foothill Facility as of June 27, 2003, was $2.8 million.
On July 16, 2003, and July 25, 2003, we amended the Foothill Facility. These amendments make the following changes to the Foothill Facility. Borrowings under the Foothill Facility bear interest at the Wells Fargo Bank National Association prevailing prime rate plus 3.0% to 4.25%, depending on the amount outstanding, and at no time will the Foothill Facility bear interest at a rate less than 10.25%. The tangible net worth financial covenant is deleted from the Foothill Facility and is replaced with a combined cash and borrowing availability financial covenant that is effective from June 27, 2003, until the Foothill Facility expiration in December 2004. This new financial covenant is adjusted and measured on a quarterly basis. As of June 27, 2003, we were in compliance with
9
this new combined cash and borrowing availability financial covenant and as a result, we have classified our senior secured debt under the Foothill Facility, which matures in December 2004, as long-term liabilities in our consolidated condensed balance sheet as of June 27, 2003.
As of June 27, 2003, we had outstanding financial letters of credit under the Foothill Facility totaling $4.1 million related to our performance on certain customer contracts. Our customers can draw against these letters of credit if we fail to meet the performance requirements included in the terms of each letter of credit. As of June 27, 2003, no amounts had been accrued for any estimated losses under the obligations, as we believe we will perform as required under our contracts.
In January 2003, Evans & Sutherland Computer Limited (ESCL), our wholly-owned subsidiary, renewed a $3.0 million overdraft facility (the Overdraft Facility) with Lloyds TSB Bank plc (Lloyds). The Overdraft Facility expires December 31, 2003. Borrowings under the Overdraft Facility bear interest at Lloyds short-term offered rate plus 1.25% per annum. As of June 27, 2003, there were $2.9 million in outstanding borrowings. Lloyds allows ESCL to borrow over $3.0 million on the Overdraft Facility on condition that any borrowings over $3.0 million are deposited with Lloyds. The Overdraft Facility is subject to reduction or demand repayment for any reason at any time at Lloyds discretion. ESCL executed a letter of negative pledge in favor of Lloyds whereby it agreed not to sell or encumber its assets, except in the ordinary course of business. Covenants contained in the Overdraft Facility restrict dividend payments from ESCL and require maintenance of certain financial covenants. In addition, at June 27, 2003, ESCL had $0.8 million deposited in a restricted cash collateral account at Lloyds related to the Overdraft Facility to support certain obligations that the bank guarantees.
4. NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE
Net income (loss) per common share is computed based on the weighted-average number of common shares and, as appropriate, dilutive common stock equivalents outstanding during the period. Stock options and the 6% Convertible Subordinated Debentures are considered to be common stock equivalents.
Basic net income (loss) per common share is the amount of net income (loss) for the period attributable to each share of common stock outstanding during the reporting period. Diluted net income (loss) per share is the amount of net income (loss) for the period attributable to each share of common stock outstanding during the reporting period and to each share that would have been outstanding assuming the issuance of common shares for all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period.
In calculating net loss per common share, net loss was the same for both the basic and diluted calculations for all periods presented because to include common stock equivalents would have been anti-dilutive.
For the three and six months ended June 27, 2003, outstanding options to purchase 2,541,972 shares of common stock and 428,000 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the 6% Convertible Subordinated Debentures were excluded from the computation of the diluted net loss per common share because to include them would have been anti-dilutive.
For the three and six months ended June 28, 2002, outstanding options to purchase 2,419,000 shares of common stock and 428,000 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the 6% Convertible Subordinated Debentures were excluded from the computation of the diluted net loss per common share because to include them would have been anti-dilutive.
10
5. GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
The following table presents sales by geographic location based on the location of the use of the product or services. Sales to individual countries greater than 10% of consolidated sales are shown separately (in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
June 27, |
|
June 28, |
|
June 27, |
|
June 28, |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
United States |
|
$ |
10,883 |
|
$ |
18,685 |
|
$ |
23,302 |
|
$ |
38,445 |
|
Europe (excluding United Kingdom) |
|
5,327 |
|
8,931 |
|
8,659 |
|
14,918 |
|
||||
United Kingdom |
|
2,994 |
|
2,599 |
|
7,823 |
|
5,995 |
|
||||
Pacific Rim |
|
2,320 |
|
3,707 |
|
2,320 |
|
6,426 |
|
||||
Other |
|
672 |
|
299 |
|
2,785 |
|
1,000 |
|
||||
|
|
$ |
22,196 |
|
$ |
34,221 |
|
$ |
44,889 |
|
$ |
66,784 |
|
The following table presents property, plant and equipment by geographic location based on the location of the assets (in thousands):
|
|
June 27, |
|
December
31, |
|
||
United States |
|
$ |
24,019 |
|
$ |
26,687 |
|
Europe |
|
$ |
1,180 |
|
1,601 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
25,199 |
|
$ |
28,288 |
|
There have been no material changes to legal proceedings from the information previously reported in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.
In the normal course of business, we have various legal claims and contingent matters, including items raised by government contracting officers and auditors. Although the final outcome of such matters cannot be predicted, we believe the ultimate disposition of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition, liquidity or results of operations.
7. RESTRUCTURING CHARGES
In the first quarter of 2003, we restructured to reduce our operating costs in line with anticipated revenues. As part of this restructuring, we recorded a charge of $1.3 million related to a reduction in force of approximately fifty full-time equivalent employees. As of June 27, 2003, we had paid $2.3 million in severance benefits related to all previous restructurings occurring over fiscal years 2003, 2002, and 2001. The majority of the remaining severance benefits are expected to be paid this fiscal year.
11
The following table represents restructure provision activity in the first six months of 2003 (in thousands):
|
|
Balance at |
|
Restructure |
|
Severance |
|
Balance at |
|
||||
|
|
12/31/02 |
|
charges |
|
benefits paid |
|
6/27/03 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
2001 Restructuring provision |
|
$ |
89 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
27 |
|
$ |
62 |
|
2002 Q2 Restructuring provision |
|
426 |
|
|
|
202 |
|
224 |
|
||||
2002 Q4 Restructuring provision |
|
1,517 |
|
|
|
1,274 |
|
243 |
|
||||
2003 Q1 Restructuring provision |
|
|
|
1,279 |
|
813 |
|
466 |
|
||||
|
|
$ |
2,032 |
|
$ |
1,279 |
|
$ |
2,316 |
|
$ |
995 |
|
8. ASSETS HELD FOR SALE
In the second quarter of 2003, we sold one of the two buildings classified as assets held for sale for a gain of $1.4 million. We currently own one office building with a book value of $2.5 million that is not considered a strategic asset and is being held for sale. This building is no longer being depreciated and is considered a current asset. We continue to market this property to prospective buyers.
9. GUARANTEES
Warranty Reserve
We provide a warranty reserve for estimated future costs of servicing products under warranty agreements extending for periods from 90 days to one year. Anticipated costs for product warranties are based upon estimates derived from experience factors and are recorded at the time of sale or over the contract period for long-term contracts. As of June 27, 2003, and December 31, 2002, we had reserved $1.1 million and $1.0 million, respectively, for estimated warranty claims. Warranty expenses for the three and six months ended June 27, 2003, were $0.8 million and $1.5 million, respectively, and the three and six months ended June 28, 2002, were $0.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively.
The following table provides the changes in our warranty reserves for the first six months of 2003 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
Provision for |
|
Warranty |
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Balance at |
|
warranty |
|
charges against |
|
Balance at |
|
||||
|
|
12/31/02 |
|
expense |
|
the reserve |
|
6/27/03 |
|
||||
Warranty reserves |
|
$ |
968 |
|
$ |
1,488 |
|
$ |
1,351 |
|
$ |
1,105 |
|
Quest Flight Training
We have a 50% interest in Quest Flight Training, Ltd. (Quest), a joint venture with Quadrant Group Ltd. (Quadrant), providing aircrew training services for the United Kingdom Ministry of Defence (U.K. MoD) under a 30-year contract. In connection with the services of Quest to the U.K. MoD, we guarantee various obligations of Quest. As of June 27, 2003, we had four guaranties outstanding related to Quest. Pursuant to the first guaranty, we have guarantied, jointly and severally with Quadrant, the performance of Quest in relation to its contract with the U.K. MoD. If Quest fails to meet its obligations under the contract then we (and Quadrant) are required to perform under the terms of the contract. Due to the length of the contract and the uncertainty of performance for which we would be liable if Quest fails to perform, we cannot estimate the maximum amount of possible future payments. This guaranty is in place until 2030. Pursuant to the second guaranty, we have guarantied, jointly and severally with Quadrant, up to a maximum amount of £1.0 million ($1.6 million as of June 27, 2003), the performance of Quest, where not subcontracted, and the performance of Quest where subcontracted, and the subcontractor is not liable to meet its obligation due to any limitation of liability in the sub-contract agreement, thus preventing Quest from meeting its obligation under its contract with the U.K. MoD. This guaranty is in place until 2020. Pursuant to the third guaranty, severally with Quadrant, we have
12
guarantied payment and discharge of a certain loan agreement that Quest has entered into. As of June 27, 2003, the outstanding loan balance was £5.1 million ($8.5 million as of June 27, 2003). This guaranty is in place until 2020. Pursuant to the fourth guaranty, we have guarantied payment, up to a maximum of £0.13 million ($0.2 million as of June 27, 2003), in the event that Quest has a default event, as defined by its loan agreement. This guaranty is in place until 2020. As of June 27, 2003, no amounts have been accrued for any estimated losses under these guaranties because we believe that Quest will meet all of its performance and financial obligations in relation to its contract with the U.K. MoD. However, if we are required to perform under any or all of the four guaranties, it could have a material adverse impact on our operating results and liquidity.
13
Item 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial statements and notes included in Item 1 of Part I of this Form 10-Q. Except for the historical information contained herein, this quarterly report on Form 10-Q includes certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of that term in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Exchange Act of 1934, including, among others, those statements preceded by, followed by, or including the words estimates, believes, expects, anticipates, plans, projects or similar expressions.
These forward-looking statements are based largely on our current expectations and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to:
|
|
Our belief that the guaranties we issued in connection with the Quest Flight Training Ltd. project will not be called upon for payment or performance and that Quest Flight Training Ltd. will meet all of its performance and financial obligations in relation to its contract with the U.K. Ministry of Defence. |
|
|
Our belief that the March 28, 2003, workforce reduction will not have a material adverse effect on our liquidity or capital resources. |
|
|
Our belief that we will perform as required under our contracts, thereby preventing our customers from drawing against our letters of credit outstanding under the Foothill Facility. |
|
|
Our belief that the restructuring that occurred during the quarter ended March 28, 2003, will reduce our expenses by approximately $4.0 million each year in the future. |
|
|
Our belief that a majority, if not all, of remaining severance benefits resulting from restructurings during 2001, 2002 and 2003 will be paid during 2003. |
|
|
Our belief that our orders backlog will increase slightly by year-end. |
|
|
Our belief that our margins on our new products and revenue from our product line mix will result in small, incremental improvements to our gross margins. |
|
|
Our belief that our service and support sales will continue to decrease for several quarters as this business starts to experience a delayed effect of the depression in the military markets. |
|
|
Our belief that our planetarium sales will continue to increase as we expect to continue to experience strong demand for these products. |
|
|
Our belief that we will continue cost reduction actions in order to further reduce operating expenses in an effort to return to operating profit performance. |
|
|
Our belief that six large Harmony 1 programs that have had a negative effect on our financial condition in years past, will not materially affect our financial condition negatively in the future. |
|
|
Our belief that existing cash, restricted cash, borrowings available under our various borrowings facilities, the sale of a certain building held for sale, and expected cash from future operations will be sufficient to meet our anticipated working capital needs, routine capital expenditures, and current debt service obligations for the next twelve months. |
|
|
Our belief that the ultimate disposition of normal, course of business legal claims and other contingent matters will not have a material adverse effect on our financial conditions, liquidity, or result of operations. |
These forward-looking statements are based largely on our current expectations and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from these forward-looking statements. Important factors to consider in evaluating such forward-looking statements include plans for future operations; financing needs or plans; plans relating to our products and services; risk of product demand; market acceptance; economic conditions; competitive products and pricing; cancellation of contracts or significant penalties due to delays in the timely delivery of our products; difficulties in product development, commercialization and technology; those guaranties we issued in connection with the services of our joint venture entity, Quest Flight Training Ltd., to the UK Ministry of Defence or other parties will not be called upon for payment or performance; assumptions relating to the foregoing; and other risks detailed in this filing and in our most recent Form 10-K. Although we believe we have the product offerings and resources for continuing success, future revenue and margin trends cannot be reliably predicted. Factors external to us can result in volatility of our common stock price. Because of the foregoing factors, recent trends are not necessarily reliable indicators of future stock prices or financial performance and there
14
can be no assurance that the events contemplated by the forward-looking statements contained in this quarterly report will, in fact, occur. For further information, refer to the business description and additional risk factors sections included in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
On July 16, 2003, and July 25, 2003, we amended our secured credit facility with Foothill Capital Corporation (the Foothill Facility). This amendment makes the following changes to the Foothill Facility. Borrowings under the Foothill Facility bear interest at the Wells Fargo Bank National Association prevailing prime rate plus 3.0% to 4.25%, depending on the amount outstanding, and at no time will the Foothill Facility bear interest at a rate less than 10.25%. The tangible net worth financial covenant is deleted from the Foothill Facility and is replaced with a combined cash and borrowing availability financial covenant that is effective from June 27, 2003, until the Foothill Facility expiration in December 2004. This new financial covenant is adjusted and measured on a quarterly basis. As of June 27, 2003, we were in compliance with this new combined cash and borrowing availability based financial covenant.
We offer a complete range of visual simulation solutions for all types of military vehicle training. We provide high-performance image generators (IGs), display systems, and visual databases for ground-based warfare, helicopter, fixed-wing aircraft, and ship bridge simulators. In addition, we are developing complete training systems for military tactics and command training.
In civil aviation, we provide visual systems to almost every major airline and aircraft manufacturer in the world. We offer a full range of FAA approved solutions for Level D, Level C, Level A/B, and desktop training, as well as upgrades for existing systems.
Strategic Visualization
We apply breakthrough technologies and capabilities originally developed for training simulation to provide rapidly generated visualization databases and services to the worlds military operations, intelligence, and training communities for mission planning, preview, rehearsal, damage assessment, or other highly time-sensitive purposes.
Digital Theater
We develop systems that transform our simulation technology into 360-degree domed and large format theater experiences. This technology allows audiences to enter full-color, computer-generated worlds and interact with them. In addition to providing theater systems for planetariums, science centers, themed attraction venues, and premium large-format theaters, we develop, market, and license a variety of show content.
15
Service & Support
We provide a full range of pre- and post-sales support for E&S products, including customized long-term support programs; on-site installation, maintenance, and repair; and maintenance training for customers. Distribution centers and support staff are strategically located in the US and UK to ensure timely, responsive service.
The policies discussed below are considered by management to be critical to an understanding of E&Ss financial statements. Their application places significant demands on managements judgment, with financial reporting results relying on estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. Specific risks for these critical accounting policies are described in the following paragraphs. A summary of significant accounting policies can be found in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements on our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002. For all of these policies, management cautions that future results rarely develop exactly as forecast, and the best estimates routinely require adjustment.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue from long-term contracts requiring significant production, modification or customization is recorded using the percentage-of-completion method. This method uses the ratio of costs incurred to managements estimate of total anticipated costs. Our estimates of total costs include assumptions, such as man-hours to complete, estimated materials cost, and estimates of other direct and indirect costs. Actual results may vary significantly from our estimates. If the actual costs are higher than managements anticipated total costs, then an adjustment is required to reduce the previously recognized revenue as the ratio of costs incurred to managements estimate was overstated. If actual costs are lower than managements anticipated total costs, then an adjustment is required to increase the previously recognized revenue as the ratio of costs incurred to managements estimate is understated.
Costs and Estimated Earnings in Excess of Billings on Uncompleted Contracts and Billings in Excess of Costs and Estimated Earnings on Uncompleted Contracts
Billings on uncompleted long-term contracts may be greater than or less than incurred costs and estimated earnings. As a result, these differences are recorded as an asset or liability on the balance sheet. Since revenue recognized on these long-term contracts includes estimates of managements anticipated total costs, the amounts in costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts and billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts also include these estimates.
Inventories
Inventory includes materials at standard costs, which approximate average costs, as well as inventoried costs on programs (including material, labor, subcontracting costs, and allocation of indirect costs). We periodically review inventories for excess supply, obsolescence, and valuations above estimated realizable amounts, and then provide a reserve we consider sufficient to cover these items. Reserve adequacy is based on estimates of future sales, product pricing, and requirements to complete projects. Revisions of these estimates would result in adjustments to our operating results.
Accrued Expenses
Accrued expenses include amounts for liquidated damages and late delivery penalties. While current contracts could include additional liquidated damages and late delivery penalties, we have included all amounts management believes E&S is liable for as of June 27, 2003. These liquidated damages are based primarily on estimates of project completion dates. To the extent completion dates are not consistent with our estimates, these damage and penalty accruals may require additional adjustments.
16
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
The preparation of our financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. We specifically analyze accounts receivables and consider historic experience, customer creditworthiness, facts, and circumstances specific to outstanding balances, current economic trends, and payment term changes when evaluating adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts. Changes in these factors could result in material adjustments to the expense recognized for bad debts.
Income Taxes
As part of the process of preparing our consolidated financial statements, we are required to estimate our actual income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate. This involves estimating our actual current tax exposure together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatments of items, such as accrued liabilities, for tax and accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included in our consolidated balance sheets. We must then assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income and, to the extent we believe that recovery is not likely, we must establish a valuation allowance. To the extent we establish a valuation allowance or increase or decrease this allowance in a period, we must include a corresponding adjustment within the tax provision in the statement of operations. Significant management judgment is required to determine our provision for income taxes, our deferred tax assets and liabilities, and any valuation allowance recorded against our net deferred tax assets.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In April 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 149 (SFAS 149), Amendment to Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. SFAS 149 amends and clarifies financial accounting and reporting for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts (collectively referred to as derivatives) and for hedging activities under SFAS 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. SFAS 149 is generally effective for contracts entered into or modified after June 30, 2003. We do not expect the adoption of this statement to have a material impact on our financial statements.
In May 2003, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 150 (SFAS 150), Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity. SFAS 150 establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. SFAS 150 is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise is effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. We do not expect the adoption of this statement to have a material impact on our financial statements.
17
Results of Operations
The following table presents the percentage of total sales represented by certain items for the periods presented:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
June 27, 2003 |
|
June 28, 2002 |
|
June 27, 2003 |
|
June 28, 2002 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
(Unaudited) |
|
||||
Sales |
|
100.0 |
% |
100.0 |
% |
100.0 |
% |
100.0 |
% |
Cost of sales |
|
61.1 |
|
64.4 |
|
61.2 |
|
67.4 |
|
Inventory impairment |
|
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
|
32.4 |
|
0.0 |
|
Gross profit |
|
38.9 |
|
35.6 |
|
6.4 |
|
32.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
31.1 |
|
21.9 |
|
31.5 |
|
21.0 |
|
Research and development |
|
23.0 |
|
19.4 |
|
27.0 |
|
19.5 |
|
Restructuring charges |
|
0.0 |
|
5.6 |
|
2.8 |
|
2.9 |
|
Impairment loss |
|
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
|
2.6 |
|
0.0 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
54.1 |
|
46.9 |
|
63.9 |
|
43.4 |
|
|
|
(15.2 |
) |
(11.3 |
) |
(57.5 |
) |
(10.8 |
) |
Gain on assets held for sale |
|
6.3 |
|
0.0 |
|
3.1 |
|
0.0 |
|
Gain on curtailment of pension plan |
|
0.0 |
|
10.5 |
|
0.0 |
|
5.4 |
|
Gain on sale of business unit |
|
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss |
|
(8.9 |
) |
(0.8 |
) |
(54.4 |
) |
(5.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expense, net |
|
(2.2 |
) |
(1.1 |
) |
(3.0 |
) |
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes |
|
(11.1 |
) |
(1.9 |
) |
(57.4 |
) |
(6.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
0.5 |
|
0.2 |
|
(0.4 |
) |
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
(11.6% |
) |
(2.1% |
) |
(57.0% |
) |
(5.9% |
) |
Second Quarter 2003 compared to Second Quarter 2002
Consolidated Sales and Gross Profit
Our total sales were $22.2 million in the second quarter of 2003, compared with $34.2 million in the second quarter of 2002. This decrease was primarily the result of a continued depression in the military markets. Our commercial market sales remained strong but declined slightly in the second quarter of 2003 due primarily to large deliveries made during the second quarter of 2002. Sales of our planetarium systems increased during the second quarter of 2003 as a result of strong demand for our new products and we expect this trend to continue. Our service and support sales decreased slightly in the second quarter of 2003. We expect sales from service and support to continue to be lower than last year as this business starts to experience a delayed effect of the depression in the military markets. Additionally, we saw growth in our new Strategic Visualization business. In the second quarter of 2003, overall backlog increased by approximately $5.8 million on strong orders performance compared to a $23.6 million decrease in the second quarter of 2002, and our book-to-bill ratio was 1.25:1.0 compared to 0.31:1.0 in the second quarter of 2002.
Our gross profit percentages improved to 38.9% in the second quarter of 2003, compared with 35.6% in the second quarter of 2002. This improvement to our gross profit percentage was the result of both improved cost performance
18
in our service and support markets and an overall revenue shift to a higher margin product mix. Offsetting some of the improvements in the second quarter of 2003 was higher warranty and support expenses. In 2003, we expect warranty and support expenses to be higher than in 2002. Additionally, margins on new products and our product line revenue mix over the remainder of fiscal year 2003 are projected to make small, incremental improvement to our overall gross profit percentages.
Operating Expenses, Other and Taxes
Our operating expenses were $12.0 million in the second quarter of 2003, compared with $16.0 million during the second quarter of 2002. Selling, general, and administrative (SG&A) expenses decreased by $0.6 million primarily as a result of lower labor costs. This savings was partially offset by increased commissions on strong orders performance and a reduction in rental income from properties sold. Research and development expenses decreased $1.6 million as a result of lower labor costs and targeted reductions in product development costs. We are continuing cost reduction actions in order to further reduce operating expenses in an effort to return to operating profit performance.
During the second quarter of 2003, E&S recognized a gain on assets held for sale of $1.4 million on the sale of a building. There were no such gains on asset sales during the second quarter of 2002.
In the second quarter of 2002, we recorded a restructuring charge of $1.9 million related to a reduction in force of approximately 90 employees in an effort to reduce the operating cost structure of the company. There were no restructuring charges during the second quarter of 2003.
During the second quarter of 2002, we recognized a gain on the curtailment of our pension plan of $3.6 million. There was no such gain during the second quarter of 2003.
Our other income (expense) was $0.5 million of net expense in the second quarter of 2003, compared to $0.4 million of net expense in the second quarter of 2002. This increase in net expense was primarily the result of miscellaneous one-time income we received during the second quarter of 2002. This increase in net expense was partially offset by a reduction in interest expense as a result of lower debt levels.
Our income tax expense was $0.1 million during the second quarter of 2003, consistent with $0.1 million of income tax expense during the second quarter of 2002. We have been and continue to reserve for all net operating loss tax assets until such time that it is more likely than not that these assets will be utilized.
First Six Months of 2003 Compared to First Six months of 2002
Consolidated Sales and Gross Profit
Our total sales were $44.9 million in the first six months of 2003, compared with $66.8 million in the first six months of 2002. This decrease was primarily the result of a continued depression in the military markets. The reduction in military spending resulted in an overall decline in military revenue and a significant shortfall of sales of our Harmony 1 product. Our commercial market sales remained strong but declined slightly in the first six months of 2003 due primarily to several large deliveries made during the first six months of 2002. Sales of our planetarium systems increased during the first six months of 2003 as a result of strong demand for our new products and we expect this trend to continue. While our service and support sales increased slightly in the first six months of 2003, we expect sales from service and support to be lower than last year as this business starts to experience a delayed effect of the depression in the military markets. Additionally, during the first six months of 2003, we saw growth in our new Strategic Visualization business. In the first six months of 2003, overall backlog increased by approximately $15.3 million on strong orders performance and our book-to-bill ratio improved to 1.34:1.0 compared to 0.58:1.0 in the first six months of 2002.
Our gross profit percentages were 6.4% in the first six months of 2003, compared with 32.6% in the first six months of 2002. This gross profit decrease was primarily due to a $14.6 million inventory impairment loss. During the first quarter 2003, certain significant orders that we had expected to receive as of December 31, 2002, and into early 2003, were canceled by customers. These cancellations were primarily the result of a re-alignment of military
19
spending priorities during the first six months of 2003. Accordingly, the future demand for our Harmony 1, ESIG, and TargetView products significantly decreased compared to our prior projections because of these cancellations. As a result, we recorded a $14.6 million impairment to specific inventory during the first quarter of 2003. Had we not incurred an inventory impairment loss in the amount of $14.6 million, our overall gross margins would have improved from 32.6% in the first six months of 2002 to 38.8% in the first six months of 2003 as a result of improved cost performance in our military, commercial, and service and support markets as well as an overall revenue shift to a higher margin product mix. Additionally, margins on new products and our product line revenue mix over the remainder of fiscal year 2003 are projected to continue to make small, incremental improvement to our gross margin percentages.
Operating Expenses, Other and Taxes
Our operating expenses were $28.7 million in the first six months of 2003, compared with $29.0 million during the first six months of 2002. Selling, general, and administrative (SG&A) expenses increased by $0.1 million primarily as a result of savings achieved during the first six months of 2002 from a shutdown for the Olympic Games held in Salt Lake City. SG&A expenses also increased during the first six months of 2003 as a result of increased commissions on orders and a reduction in rental income from properties sold. These increases in SG&A expenses offset significant labor cost reductions. Research and development expenses decreased $0.9 million during the first six months of 2003 primarily as a result of lower labor costs. These reductions were also partially offset by savings from the Olympic shutdown during the first six months of 2002.
During the first six months of 2003, we recorded a restructuring charge of $1.3 million related to a reduction in force of approximately fifty full-time equivalent employees in an attempt to reduce operating costs as well as to create a cost structure in line with anticipated revenues. We estimate that this restructuring will reduce expenses by approximately $4.0 million per year going forward. We are continuing cost reduction actions in order to further reduce operating expenses in an effort to return to operating profit performance.
During the first six months of 2002, we recorded a restructuring charge of $1.9 million related to a reduction in force of approximately 90 employees in an effort to reduce the operating cost structure of the company.
During the first quarter of 2003, we recognized an impairment loss of $1.2 million on development and demonstration assets related to the impaired Harmony 1, ESIG, and TargetView product line inventory.
During the first six months of 2003, E&S recognized a gain on assets held for sale of $1.4 million on the sale of a building. There were no gains on asset sales during the first six months of 2002.
During the first six months of 2002, we recognized a gain on the curtailment of the pension plan of $3.6 million. There was no such gain during the first six months of 2003.
In the first six months of 2002 we recognized a gain on the sale of the REALimageÒ Solutions Group of $0.1 million. There was no such gain in the first six months of 2003.
Our other expense was $1.3 million of net expense in the first six months of 2003, compared to $1.0 million of net expense in the first six months of 2002. This $0.3 million increase was the result of a $0.5 million write-down of a nonmarketable investment in Quantum Vision, Inc. based on our analysis and meeting with Quantum Vision, Inc. in the first six months of 2003. We determined this technology would not enhance our own technology or strategic direction. This first six months variance was partially offset by a reduction of interest expense as a result of significantly reduced debt levels.
Our income tax benefit was $0.1 million during the first six months of 2003, compared to $0.6 million during the first six months of 2002. The income tax benefit in the first six months of 2002 was the result of a change in the tax law which allowed us to use additional net operating losses to offset taxable income. The income tax benefit in the first six months of 2003 was due to the favorable resolution of potential foreign tax liabilities. We have been and continue to reserve for all net operating loss tax assets until such time that it is more likely than not that these assets will be utilized.
20
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
General Overview
On June 27, 2003, we had working capital of $34.8 million, including cash and restricted cash of $10.5 million, compared to working capital of $56.0 million at December 31, 2002, including cash and restricted cash of $10.3 million. During the first six months of 2003, we used $0.7 million of cash in our operating activities, generated $3.0 million in cash in our investing activities, and generated $0.1 million of cash in our financing activities. In the second quarter of 2003, we sold one of our buildings that was designated as an asset held for sale and received net cash of $4.8 million. In the first quarter of 2003, we recognized impairments to inventory and fixed assets of $15.7 million in relation to a significant decrease in demand for some of our older product lines. We also reduced our work force by fifty full-time equivalent employees that resulted in an additional severance benefit liability and is expected to save $4.0 million per year going forward. Finally, through the end of 2002, a significant factor in our financial condition was six large, fixed-price defense contracts that used our Harmony 1 image generator. As of the end of 2002, we had a ninety-nine percent completion rate, on average, of these six large programs. As a result, these six programs had no material negative effect on our financial condition in the first six months of 2003, nor do we expect them to materially affect our financial condition negatively in the future.
Impairments
During the first quarter of 2003, certain significant orders that we had expected to receive as of December 31, 2002, and into early 2003, were cancelled by customers. These cancellations were primarily the result of a re-alignment of military spending priorities during the first quarter of 2003. Accordingly, the future demand for our Harmony 1, ESIG, and TargetView products significantly decreased compared to our prior projections because of these cancellations. As a result, we recorded a $14.6 million impairment to specific inventory and a $1.2 million impairment to certain fixed assets related to the manufacture of these products.
Restructure Provisions
At the end of the first quarter of 2003, we restructured the company, resulting in a reduction in force of approximately fifty full-time equivalent employees. As a result, we accrued $1.3 million for estimated severance benefits that we expect to pay. In addition, in the first six months of 2003, we paid $2.3 million in severance benefits related to restructure provisions from fiscal years 2003, 2002 and 2001. As of the June 27, 2003, we had an accrued balance of $1.0 million for all restructure provisions remaining. We expect a majority, if not all, remaining severance benefits to be paid during 2003.
Cash Flow
During the first six months of 2003, we used $0.7 million of cash in our operating activities, generated $3.0 million in cash in our investing activities, and generated $0.1 million of cash in our financing activities.
Cash from our operating activities in the first six months of 2003 was negatively impacted by a net loss of $25.6 million and a gain on sale of assets held for sale of $1.4 million. This use of cash was offset by $14.6 million in inventory impairment, $3.7 million in depreciation and amortization, $4.2 million change in working capital, $2.1 million in provisions, and $1.2 million in impairment loss. Changes in working capital in the first six months of 2003 were due to a decrease in net costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on completed projects of $4.5 million, an increase in customer deposits of $2.3 million, a decrease in accounts receivable of $2.1 million, a decrease in accrued expenses of $2.0 million, a decrease in accounts payable of $1.7 million, and an increase in inventory of $1.2 million, after adjusting for impairments. Net costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on completed projects decreased, in part, due to converting a material amount of unbilled receivables at the beginning of the year to billed receivables related to our Simulation Systems business while over the same period billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings were significantly reduced in our Commercial Simulation business. Customer deposits increased in the first six months of 2003 due to new orders in our Simulation Systems and Commercial Systems businesses units. Accounts receivable decreased as a result of additional collections on two of the six large, fixed-price defense contracts that used our Harmony 1 image generator that have in previous years had longer than average agings. Accrued expenses decreased due to restructuring payments and warranty claims. Our
21
investing activities in the first six months generated cash of $3.0 million due to the sale of one our buildings classified as an asset held for sale and was offset by the purchase of property, plant and equipment. Our financing activities generated cash in the first six months of 2003 of $0.1 million with a reduction in our restricted cash of $2.2 million that was offset by a net decrease in borrowings of $2.2 million.
Credit Facilities
In December 2002, we renewed the secured credit facility (the Foothill Facility) with Foothill Capital Corporation (Foothill). The Foothill Facility provides for borrowings and the issuance of letters of credit up to $25.0 million and expires in December 2004. Note 3 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q contains a detailed description of the Foothill Facility. As of the quarters ended March 28, 2003, and June 27, 2003, we were not in compliance with the tangible net worth financial covenants of our Foothill Facility. However, as described below, the Foothill Facility was amended on July 16, 2003, and July 25, 2003, and we then were in compliance with all covenants as of June 27, 2003. As a result, we have classified our senior secured debt under the Foothill Facility, which matures in December 2004, as long-term liabilities in our consolidated condensed balance sheet as of June 27, 2003. As of June 27, 2003, we had $2.8 million in outstanding borrowings. As of August 1, 2003, we had no outstanding borrowings against the Foothill Facility.
As of June 27, 2003, we had outstanding financial standby letters of credit totaling $4.1 million related to our performance on certain customer contracts. Our customers can draw against these letters of credit if we fail to meet the performance requirements contained within the terms of each letter of credit. As of June 27, 2003, no amounts have been accrued for any estimated losses under these obligations, as we believe it is probable that we will perform as required under our contracts. As of August 1, 2003, we had outstanding financial standby letters of credit of $4.9 million.
On July 16, 2003, and July 25, 2003, we amended the Foothill Facility. These amendments make the following changes to the Foothill Facility. Borrowings under the Foothill Facility bear interest at the Wells Fargo Bank National Association prevailing prime rate plus 3.0% to 4.25%, depending on the amount outstanding, and at no time will the Foothill Facility bear interest at a rate less than 10.25%. The tangible net worth financial covenant is deleted from the Foothill Facility and is replaced with a combined cash and borrowing availability financial covenant that is effective from June 27, 2003, until the Foothill Facility expiration in December 2004. This new financial covenant is adjusted and measured on a quarterly basis. As of June 27, 2003, we were in compliance with this new combined cash and borrowing availability financial covenant.
In January 2003, Evans & Sutherland Computer Limited (ESCL), our wholly-owned subsidiary, renewed a $3.0 million overdraft facility (the Overdraft Facility) with Lloyds TSB Bank plc (Lloyds). The Overdraft Facility expires on December 31, 2003. Borrowings under the Overdraft Facility bear interest at Lloyds short-term offered rate plus 1.25% per annum. As of June 27, 2003, there were $2.9 million in outstanding borrowings. Note 3 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q contains a detailed description of the Overdraft Facility. In addition, at June 27, 2003, ESCL had $0.8 million deposited in a restricted cash collateral account at Lloyds related to the Overdraft Facility to support certain obligations that the bank guarantees. As of August 1, 2003, ESCL had no outstanding borrowings against the Overdraft Facility.
Other Information
We have a 50% interest in Quest Flight Training, Ltd. (Quest), a joint venture with Quadrant Group Ltd. (Quadrant) providing aircrew training services for the United Kingdom Ministry of Defence (U.K. MoD) under a 30-year contract. In connection with the services of Quest to the U.K. MoD, we guarantee various obligations of Quest. As of June 27, 2003, we had four guaranties outstanding related to Quest. Pursuant to the first guaranty, we have guarantied, jointly and severally with Quadrant, the performance of Quest in relation to its contract with the U.K. MoD. If Quest fails to meet its obligations under the contract then we (and Quadrant) are required to perform under the terms of the contract. Due to the length of the contract and the uncertainty of performance for which we would be liable if Quest fails to perform, we cannot estimate the maximum amount of possible future payments. This guaranty is in place until 2030. Pursuant to the second guaranty, we have guarantied, jointly and severally with Quadrant, up to a maximum amount of £1.0 million ($1.6 million as of June 27, 2003), the performance of Quest, where not subcontracted, and the performance of Quest where subcontracted, and the subcontractor is not liable to
22
meet its obligation due to any limitation of liability in the sub-contract agreement, thus preventing Quest from meeting its obligation under its contract with the U.K. MoD. This guaranty is in place until 2020. Pursuant to the third guaranty, severally with Quadrant, we have guarantied payment and discharge of a certain loan agreement that Quest has entered into. As of June 27, 2003, the outstanding loan balance was £5.1million ($8.5 million as of June 27, 2003). This guaranty is in place until 2020. Pursuant to the fourth guaranty, we have guarantied payment, up to a maximum of £0.13 million ($0.2 million as of June 27, 2003), in the event that Quest has a default event, as defined by its loan agreement. This guaranty is in place until 2020. As of June 27, 2003, no amounts have been accrued for any estimated losses under these guaranties because we believe that Quest will meet all of its performance and financial obligations in relation to its contract with the U.K. MoD. However, if we are required to perform under any or all of the four guaranties, it could have a material adverse impact on our operating results and liquidity.
As of June 27, 2003, we had approximately $18.0 million of 6% Convertible Subordinated Debentures due in 2012 (the 6% Debentures). The 6% Debentures are unsecured and are convertible at each bondholders option into shares of our common stock at a conversion price of $42.10 or 428,000 shares of our common stock, subject to adjustment. The 6% Debentures are redeemable at our option, in whole or in part, at par.
On February 18, 1998, E&Ss Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 600,000 shares of our common stock, including the 327,000 shares still available from the repurchase authorization approved by the Board of Directors on November 11, 1996. On September 8, 1998, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of an additional 1,000,000 shares of our common stock. On August 1, 2003, 463,500 shares remained available for repurchase. No shares were repurchased during 2002 or in the first six months of 2003. Stock may be acquired on the open market or through negotiated transactions. Under the program, repurchases may be made from time to time, depending on market conditions, share price and other factors. The Foothill Facility requires that we obtain prior consent from Foothill before we repurchase any shares.
We also maintain trade credit arrangements with certain of our suppliers. The unavailability of a significant portion of, or the loss of, the various borrowing facilities of E&S or trade credit from suppliers would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and operations.
In the event our various borrowing facilities were to become unavailable, we were unable to make timely deliveries of products pursuant to the terms of various agreements with third parties, or certain of our contracts were adversely impacted for failure to meet delivery requirements, we may be unable to meet our anticipated working capital needs, routine capital expenditures, and current debt service obligations on a short-term and long-term basis.
We believe that the principal sources of liquidity for 2003 will be a result of positive cash flows from the restructuring that has taken place, other cost-cutting measures (which will be implemented during 2003), the sale of a building in the second quarter of 2003, and the anticipated sale of one remaining building designated as assets held for sale. Circumstances that could materially affect liquidity in 2003 include, but are not limited to, the following: (i) our ability to meet contractual milestones related to the delivery and integration of our Harmony image generators, (ii) our ability to successfully develop and produce new technologies and products, (iii) our ability to meet our forecasted sales levels during 2003, (iv) our ability to reduce costs and expenses, (v) our ability to maintain our commercial simulation business in light of current economic conditions, and (vi) our ability to favorably negotiate a sale agreement related to the remaining building we have for sale.
We believe that existing cash, restricted cash, borrowings available under our various borrowing facilities, the sale of a certain building currently held for sale, and expected cash from future operations will be sufficient to meet our anticipated working capital needs, routine capital expenditures and current debt service obligations for the next twelve months. At June 27, 2003, our total indebtedness was $23.7 million. The Foothill Facility expires in December 2004 and the Overdraft Facility expires on December 31, 2003. If these credit facilities continue to be needed beyond their respective expiration dates, we will attempt to replace them; however, there can be no assurances that we will be successful in renegotiating our existing borrowing facilities or obtaining additional debt or equity financing. Our cash and restricted cash, subject to various restrictions previously set forth, are available for working capital needs, capital expenditures, strategic investments, mergers and acquisitions, stock repurchases, and other potential cash needs as they may arise.
23
TRADEMARKS USED IN THIS FORM 10-Q
E&S, Harmony, REALimage, EP, and TargetView, are trademarks or registered trademarks of Evans & Sutherland Computer Corporation. All other products, services, or trade names or marks are the properties of their respective owners.
24
Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The principal market risks to which we are exposed are changes in foreign currency exchange rates and changes in interest rates. Our international sales, which accounted for 51% of our total sales in the six months ended June 27, 2003, are concentrated in the United Kingdom, continental Europe, and Asia. Foreign currency purchase and sale contracts are entered into for periods consistent with related underlying exposures and do not constitute positions independent of those exposures. We do not enter into contracts for trading purposes and do not use leveraged contracts. As of June 27, 2003, we had seven material sales or purchase contracts in a currency other than U.S. dollars and no foreign currency derivative contracts.
We reduce our exposure to changes in interest rates by maintaining a high proportion of our debt in fixed-rate instruments. As of June 27, 2003, 76% of our total debt was in fixed-rate instruments. Had we fully drawn on our $25 million revolving line of credit with Foothill Capital Corporation and our foreign line of credit, 39% of our total debt would be in fixed-rate instruments.
The information below summarizes our market risks associated with debt obligations as of June 27, 2003. Fair values have been determined by quoted market prices. For debt obligations, the table below presents the principal cash flows and related interest rates by fiscal year of maturity. Bank borrowings bear variable rates of interest and the 6% Debentures bear a fixed rate of interest. The information below should be read in conjunction with Note 3 of Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I of this quarterly report.
|
|
Rate |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
Thereafter |
|
Total |
|
Fair Value |
|
||||||||
Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Bank Borrowings |
|
5.8 |
% |
$ |
2,929 |
|
$ |
2,800 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
5,729 |
|
$ |
5,729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
6% Debentures |
|
6.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
18,015 |
|
$ |
18,015 |
|
$ |
5,134 |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Total debt |
|
|
|
$ |
2,929 |
|
$ |
2,800 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
18,015 |
|
$ |
23,744 |
|
$ |
10,863 |
|
Item 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
As of the end of the quarter ended June 27, 2003, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information required to be included in our periodic SEC reports. It should be noted that the design of any system of controls is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions, regardless of how remote.
25
There has been no material developments in the legal proceeding disclosed in E&Ss Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 28, 2003.
In the normal course of business, we have various other legal claims and other contingent matters, including items raised by government contracting officers and auditors. Although the final outcome of such matters cannot be predicted, we believe the ultimate disposition of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition, liquidity, or results of operations.
Pursuant to our secured revolving credit facility (the Foothill Facility) with Foothill Capital Corporation (Foothill), which expires in December 2004 and provides for borrowings and the issuance of letters of credit up to $25.0 million, we were required to maintain a minimum tangible net worth each quarter, as outlined in the Foothill Facility agreement (the Net Worth Covenant). In our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 28, 2003, we reported that as of that date, we were not in compliance with the Net Worth Covenant, but that we were negotiating with Foothill to obtain a waiver of the Net Worth Covenant or to change the covenant for the remainder of the Foothill Facility, which expires in December 2004. In the event of a covenant violation, Foothill has the ability, at any time, to accelerate all of our indebtedness under the Foothill Facility. Accordingly, for the quarter ending March 28, 2003, we classified our senior secured debt under the Foothill Facility, which matures in December 2004, as a current liability in the Companys consolidated condensed balance sheet as of March 28, 2003.
On July 16, 2003, and July 25, 2003, E&S and Foothill amended the Foothill Facility. This amendment makes the following changes to the Foothill Facility. The Net Worth Covenant is deleted from the Foothill Facility and is replaced with a combined cash and borrowing availability financial covenant that is effective from June 27, 2003, until the Foothill Facility expiration in December 2004. This new financial covenant is adjusted and measured on a quarterly basis. As of June 27, 2003, we were in compliance with this new combined cash and borrowing availability financial covenant. Also, borrowings under the Foothill Facility bear interest at the Wells Fargo Bank National Association prevailing prime rate plus 3.0% to 4.25%, depending on the amount outstanding, and at no time will the Foothill Facility bear interest at a rate less than 10.25%. As a result of this amendment, for the quarter ended June 27, 2003, we have classified our senior secured debt under the Foothill Facility, which matures in December 2004, as long term liabilities in the Companys consolidated condensed balance sheet as June 27, 2003. The outstanding balance owed to Foothill pursuant to the Foothill Facility as of June 27, 2003 was $2.8 million.
Item 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
We held our Annual Meeting of Shareholders on May 8, 2003. We solicited proxies for the meeting pursuant to Regulation 14A. At the meeting, our shareholders voted on the ratification of KPMG LLP as independent auditors of the Company for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2003. The results were as follows:
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstentions |
|
Broker Non-vote |
10,136,635 |
|
37,532 |
|
3,199 |
|
|
On April 14, 2003, we inadvertently filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) a Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A (the Proxy Statement) that contained language from a draft and did not contain the correct language from the final version of the Proxy Statement that had been approved and adopted by the
26
Companys Board of Directors. Within the Proxy Statement under the heading Compensation and Stock Options Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation there was a mischaracterization of the relationship between one of the Companys directors, David J. Coghlan, and Quest Flight Training Ltd. and Quadrant Group Ltd., a principal owner of Quest Flight Training Ltd. Quest Flight Training Ltd. is a joint venture owned by the Company and Quadrant Group Ltd. The language used should have read Mr. Coghlan is a director of both Quest Flight Training Ltd. and of Quadrant Group Ltd. Members of Mr. Coghlans family own an indirect beneficial ownership interest in a majority of the outstanding shares of Quadrant Group Ltd. Mr. Coghlan has disclaimed any beneficial ownership in said interest in Quadrant Group Ltd.
Within the Proxy Statement under the heading Report of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, language concerning the independence of all Directors was incorrect. The language should have read The Board of Directors has reviewed the SECs definitions that would classify a Board Member or Audit Committee Member as an outside and independent Member, and has determined that all members of the Audit Committee are independent directors as defined by the listing standards of the Nasdaq National Market System.
Disclosure of information pursuant to this Item 5 shall not be deemed an admission that the original Proxy Statement, when filed, included any untrue statement of a material fact or omitted to state a material fact necessary to make a statement therein not misleading.
Item 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) Exhibits
31.1 |
|
Certification under Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 of James R. Oyler. |
31.2 |
|
Certification under Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 of E. Thomas Atchison. |
32.1 |
|
Certification under Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 of James R. Oyler and E. Thomas Atchison. |
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
|
|
On April 17, 2003, the Company furnished to the SEC a Current Report pursuant to Item 9 of Form 8-K, Regulation FD Disclosure. In the Report, the Company disclosed its announcement by press release on the same date of the Companys earnings for the three months ended March 28, 2003. The Company included in the Report unaudited Summary Statements of Consolidated Operations for the three months ended March 28, 2003, Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets dated March 28, 2003, and December 31, 2002, and the Companys backlog as of March 28, 2003, and December 31, 2002. |
27
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
EVANS & SUTHERLAND COMPUTER CORPORATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date |
August 8, 2003 |
By: |
/S/ E. Thomas Atchison |
|
|
|
E. Thomas Atchison, Vice President, |
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer, and Corporate Secretary |
|
|
|
(Authorized Officer) |
|
|
|
(Principal Financial Officer) |
28