UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
ý Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003, or
o Transition report pursuant to section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 1-13374
REALTY INCOME CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Maryland |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
|
33-0580106 |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
220 West Crest Street, Escondido, California 92025 |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
(760) 741-2111 |
(Registrants telephone number) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES ý NO o
There were 35,023,437 shares of common stock outstanding as of August 6, 2003.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). Yes ý No o
REALTY INCOME CORPORATION
Form 10-Q
June 30, 2003
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
|||||
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||||
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|||||||
2
Item 1. Financial Statements
REALTY INCOME CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
||
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Real estate, at cost: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Land |
|
$ |
488,912 |
|
$ |
467,488 |
|
Buildings and improvements |
|
842,568 |
|
818,412 |
|
||
|
|
1,331,480 |
|
1,285,900 |
|
||
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
(260,988 |
) |
(254,250 |
) |
||
Net real estate held for investment |
|
1,070,492 |
|
1,031,650 |
|
||
Real estate held for sale, net |
|
11,845 |
|
6,528 |
|
||
Net real estate |
|
1,082,337 |
|
1,038,178 |
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
4,719 |
|
8,921 |
|
||
Accounts receivable |
|
3,279 |
|
4,408 |
|
||
Goodwill, net |
|
17,206 |
|
17,206 |
|
||
Other assets |
|
11,573 |
|
11,517 |
|
||
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,119,114 |
|
$ |
1,080,230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Distributions payable |
|
$ |
6,916 |
|
$ |
6,801 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
7,393 |
|
5,047 |
|
||
Other liabilities |
|
6,085 |
|
6,227 |
|
||
Line of credit payable |
|
52,100 |
|
109,700 |
|
||
Notes payable |
|
330,000 |
|
230,000 |
|
||
Total liabilities |
|
402,494 |
|
357,775 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Preferred stock and paid in capital, par value $1.00 per share, 20,000,000 shares authorized, 4,125,700 shares issued and outstanding |
|
99,368 |
|
99,368 |
|
||
Common stock and paid in capital, par value $1.00 per share, 100,000,000 shares authorized, 35,018,368 and 34,874,827 shares issued and outstanding in 2003 and 2002, respectively |
|
857,393 |
|
855,818 |
|
||
Distributions in excess of net income |
|
(240,141 |
) |
(232,731 |
) |
||
Total stockholders equity |
|
716,620 |
|
722,455 |
|
||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,119,114 |
|
$ |
1,080,230 |
|
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.
3
REALTY INCOME CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
Three |
|
Three |
|
Six |
|
Six |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
REVENUE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Rental |
|
$ |
36,179 |
|
$ |
32,604 |
|
$ |
71,311 |
|
$ |
64,930 |
|
Gain on sales of real estate acquired for resale |
|
296 |
|
1,126 |
|
572 |
|
1,491 |
|
||||
Interest and other |
|
30 |
|
52 |
|
141 |
|
82 |
|
||||
|
|
36,505 |
|
33,782 |
|
72,024 |
|
66,503 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
EXPENSES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Interest |
|
6,618 |
|
5,803 |
|
12,582 |
|
11,408 |
|
||||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
8,265 |
|
7,416 |
|
16,271 |
|
14,673 |
|
||||
General and administrative |
|
2,707 |
|
2,348 |
|
5,454 |
|
4,737 |
|
||||
Property |
|
604 |
|
525 |
|
1,257 |
|
1,134 |
|
||||
Income taxes |
|
256 |
|
598 |
|
422 |
|
886 |
|
||||
|
|
18,450 |
|
16,690 |
|
35,986 |
|
32,838 |
|
||||
Income from operations |
|
18,055 |
|
17,092 |
|
36,038 |
|
33,665 |
|
||||
Gain on sales of investment properties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
340 |
|
||||
Income from continuing operations |
|
18,055 |
|
17,092 |
|
36,038 |
|
34,005 |
|
||||
Income from discontinued operations |
|
2,535 |
|
1,353 |
|
2,585 |
|
2,734 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net income |
|
20,590 |
|
18,445 |
|
38,623 |
|
36,739 |
|
||||
Preferred stock dividends |
|
(2,428 |
) |
(2,428 |
) |
(4,856 |
) |
(4,856 |
) |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net income available to common stockholders |
|
$ |
18,162 |
|
$ |
16,017 |
|
$ |
33,767 |
|
$ |
31,883 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted income from continuing operations per common share |
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
$ |
0.89 |
|
$ |
0.88 |
|
Basic net income per common share |
|
$ |
0.52 |
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
$ |
0.97 |
|
$ |
0.96 |
|
Diluted net income per common share |
|
$ |
0.52 |
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
$ |
0.96 |
|
$ |
0.96 |
|
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.
4
REALTY INCOME CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002
(dollars in thousands)
(unaudited)
|
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net income |
|
$ |
38,623 |
|
$ |
36,739 |
|
Adjustments to net income: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
16,271 |
|
14,673 |
|
||
Income from discontinued operations |
|
(2,585 |
) |
(2,734 |
) |
||
Cash from discontinued operations |
|
510 |
|
1,955 |
|
||
Investment in real estate acquired for resale |
|
(3,776 |
) |
(4,462 |
) |
||
Proceeds from sales of real estate acquired for resale |
|
4,250 |
|
11,729 |
|
||
Gain on sales of real estate acquired for resale |
|
(572 |
) |
(1,491 |
) |
||
Gain on sales of investment properties |
|
|
|
(340 |
) |
||
Amortization of deferred stock compensation |
|
461 |
|
284 |
|
||
Change in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Accounts receivable and other assets |
|
2,447 |
|
2,496 |
|
||
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
1,189 |
|
13 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
56,818 |
|
58,862 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Proceeds from sales of investment properties: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
From continuing operations |
|
|
|
1,198 |
|
||
From discontinued operations |
|
7,980 |
|
6,017 |
|
||
Acquisition of and additions to investment properties |
|
(65,104 |
) |
(87,567 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
(57,124 |
) |
(80,352 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Borrowings from lines of credit |
|
107,700 |
|
165,900 |
|
||
Payments under lines of credit |
|
(165,300 |
) |
(95,400 |
) |
||
Proceeds from notes issued, net of costs of $1,492 |
|
98,508 |
|
|
|
||
Distributions to common stockholders |
|
(41,062 |
) |
(37,934 |
) |
||
Distributions to preferred stockholders |
|
(4,856 |
) |
(2,974 |
) |
||
Proceeds from stock offerings, net of offering costs of $92 |
|
|
|
8,158 |
|
||
Proceeds from other common stock issuances |
|
1,114 |
|
2,515 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
(3,896 |
) |
40,265 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
(4,202 |
) |
18,775 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
8,921 |
|
2,467 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
4,719 |
|
$ |
21,242 |
|
For supplemental disclosures, see note 10.
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.
5
REALTY INCOME CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2003
(Unaudited)
1. Management Statement
The consolidated financial statements of Realty Income Corporation (Realty Income, the Company, we or our) were prepared from our books and records without audit and include all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring accruals) necessary to present a fair statement of results for the interim periods presented. Certain of the 2002 balances have been reclassified to conform to the 2003 presentation. Readers of this quarterly report should refer to our audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2002, which are included in our 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K, as certain disclosures which would substantially duplicate those contained in such audited financial statements have been omitted from this report.
2. Note Offering
In March 2003, we issued $100 million of 5-3/8% senior unsecured notes due 2013 (the 2013 Notes). The notes were sold at 99.509% of par. The proceeds from this offering were used to repay borrowings under our unsecured acquisition credit facility. Interest on the 2013 Notes is paid semiannually.
3. Retail Properties Acquired by Realty Income
During the first six months of 2003, we invested $67.5 million in 67 new retail properties and properties under development with an initial weighted average contractual lease rate of 11.0%. These 67 properties are located in ten states, will contain approximately 231,600 leasable square feet and are 100% leased, with an average initial lease term of 20.2 years.
During the first six months of 2002, we invested $86.8 million in 91 new retail properties and properties under development with an initial weighted average contractual lease rate of 10.4%. These 91 properties are located in 24 states, contain approximately 430,700 leasable square feet and are 100% leased, with an average initial lease term of 19.9 years.
4. Gain on Sales of Investment Properties
During the second quarter of 2003, we sold ten investment properties for $5.5 million, which resulted in a gain of $2.6 million. During the second quarter of 2002, we sold ten investment properties for $3.8 million, which resulted in a gain of $1.3 million. Each of these gains on sales of investment properties is included in discontinued operations.
During the first six months of 2003, we sold 14 investment properties and exchanged three excess land parcels (from three properties) for $9.7 million, which resulted in a gain of $2.7 million. This gain is included in discontinued operations. During the first six months of 2002, we sold 16 investment properties for $7.2 million, which resulted in a gain of $2.4 million. Of this gain, $2.1 million is included in discontinued operations.
6
5. Retail Properties Acquired by Crest Net Lease, Inc.
A. During the first six months of 2003, Crest Net Lease, Inc. (Crest Net) invested $3.8 million in two new retail properties and properties under development. The new retail properties contain approximately 9,600 leasable square feet and are leased with an initial lease term of 20.1 years.
During the first six months of 2002, Crest Net invested $3.8 million in two new retail properties and properties under development.
B. At June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, investments in properties owned by Crest Net totaled $4.7 million and $4.6 million, respectively, and are included in real estate held for sale, net, on our consolidated balance sheets.
6. Gain on Sales of Real Estate Acquired for Resale
During the second quarter of 2003, Crest Net sold one property for $1.5 million, which resulted in a gain of $296,000. During the second quarter of 2002, Crest Net sold eight properties for $9.0 million, which resulted in a gain of $1.1 million.
During the first six months of 2003, Crest Net sold three properties for $4.2 million, which resulted in a gain of $572,000. During the first six months of 2002, Crest Net sold 11 properties for $11.7 million, which resulted in a gain of $1.5 million.
7. Discontinued Operations
The operations of 11 properties listed as held for sale at June 30, 2003, plus properties sold in 2002 and 2003, were reported as discontinued operations. The following is a summary of our discontinued operations (dollars in thousands):
|
|
Three |
|
Three |
|
Six |
|
Six |
|
||||
Rental revenue |
|
$ |
173 |
|
$ |
1,082 |
|
$ |
683 |
|
$ |
2,153 |
|
Interest and other revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
1 |
|
||||
Gain on sales of investment properties |
|
2,550 |
|
1,305 |
|
2,716 |
|
2,079 |
|
||||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
(54 |
) |
(223 |
) |
(141 |
) |
(470 |
) |
||||
Property expenses |
|
(134 |
) |
(141 |
) |
(178 |
) |
(199 |
) |
||||
Provisions for impairment loss |
|
|
|
(670 |
) |
(500 |
) |
(830 |
) |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Income from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
2,535 |
|
$ |
1,353 |
|
$ |
2,585 |
|
$ |
2,734 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted income from discontinued operations per common share |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
7
8. Distributions Paid and Payable
A. We pay monthly distributions to our common stockholders. The following is a summary of the monthly cash distributions per common share during the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002. At June 30, 2003, a distribution of $0.1975 per common share was declared (and was paid on July 15, 2003).
Month |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
||
January |
|
$ |
0.19500 |
|
$ |
0.19000 |
|
February |
|
0.19500 |
|
0.19000 |
|
||
March |
|
0.19500 |
|
0.19000 |
|
||
April |
|
0.19625 |
|
0.19125 |
|
||
May |
|
0.19625 |
|
0.19125 |
|
||
June |
|
0.19625 |
|
0.19125 |
|
||
Total |
|
$ |
1.17375 |
|
$ |
1.14375 |
|
B. In May 1999, we issued 2,760,000 shares of 9-3/8% Class B cumulative redeemable preferred stock (the Class B Preferred), of which 2,745,700 shares were outstanding during the first six months of 2003 and 2002. Beginning May 25, 2004, the Class B Preferred shares are redeemable at our option for $25.00 per share. Dividends on the Class B Preferred are paid quarterly in arrears. During each of the first two quarters of 2003 and 2002, we paid a quarterly dividend to holders of our Class B Preferred of $0.5859 per share, totaling $3.2 million for the first six months of 2003 and 2002. The 2002 second quarter dividend was paid on July 1, 2002.
C. In July 1999, we issued 1,380,000 shares of 9-1/2% Class C cumulative redeemable preferred stock (the Class C Preferred), all of which were outstanding during the first six months of 2003 and 2002. Beginning July 30, 2004, the Class C Preferred shares are redeemable at our option for $25.00 per share. Dividends on the Class C Preferred are paid monthly in arrears. During each of the first six months of 2003 and 2002, we paid six monthly dividends to holders of our Class C Preferred of $0.1979 per share totaling $1.6 million. The June 2002 dividend was paid on July 1, 2002.
9. Net Income per Common Share
Basic net income per common share is computed by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each period. Diluted net income per common share is computed by dividing net income available to common stockholders for the period by the number of common shares that would have been outstanding assuming the issuance of common shares for all potentially dilutive common shares outstanding during the reporting period.
The following is a reconciliation of the denominator of the basic net income per common share computation to the denominator of the diluted net income per common share computation:
|
|
Three |
|
Three |
|
Six |
|
Six |
|
Weighted average shares used for the basic net income per share computation |
|
35,009,554 |
|
33,310,413 |
|
34,987,332 |
|
33,178,176 |
|
Incremental shares from the assumed exercise of stock options |
|
50,054 |
|
57,946 |
|
45,612 |
|
52,641 |
|
Adjusted weighted average shares used for diluted net income per share computation |
|
35,059,608 |
|
33,368,359 |
|
35,032,944 |
|
33,230,817 |
|
8
No stock options were anti-dilutive for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002.
10. Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information
Interest paid during the first six months of 2003 and 2002 was $10.1 million and $10.5 million, respectively. Interest capitalized to properties under development was $319,000 in the first six months of 2003 and $256,000 in the first six months of 2002.
Income taxes paid by Realty Income and Crest Net in the first six months of 2003 and 2002 totaled $365,000 and $960,000, respectively.
The following non-cash investing and financing activities are included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements (dollars in thousands):
A. Restricted stock grants resulted in the following:
|
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
||
Common stock and paid in capital |
|
$ |
3,319 |
|
$ |
3,282 |
|
Common stock and paid in capital, deferred stock compensation |
|
$ |
(3,319 |
) |
$ |
(3,282 |
) |
B. In 2003, we exchanged excess land parcels from three different properties leased by one of our tenants for land (with improvements) owned by that same tenant. The land exchanged and received was valued at $1.7 million and no gain or loss was recognized.
C. In 2003, accrued costs on properties under development resulted in the following:
Buildings |
|
$ |
1,015 |
Other liabilities |
|
$ |
1,015 |
11. Segment Information
We evaluate performance and make resource allocation decisions on an industry by industry basis. For financial reporting purposes, we have grouped our tenants into 11 reportable industry segments, except for properties owned by Crest Net that are grouped together and included in other non-reportable segments. All of the properties are incorporated into one of the applicable segments. Because almost all of our leases require the tenant to pay operating expenses, revenue is the only component of segment profit and loss we measure.
9
The following tables set forth certain information regarding the properties owned by us, classified according to the business of the respective tenants as of June 30, 2003 (dollars in thousands):
Revenue for the: |
|
Three |
|
Three |
|
Six |
|
Six |
|
||||
Segment rental revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Automotive parts |
|
$ |
2,524 |
|
$ |
2,433 |
|
$ |
5,105 |
|
$ |
5,213 |
|
Automotive service |
|
3,000 |
|
2,219 |
|
5,880 |
|
3,955 |
|
||||
Child care |
|
6,719 |
|
6,645 |
|
13,300 |
|
13,308 |
|
||||
Consumer electronics |
|
1,146 |
|
1,140 |
|
2,316 |
|
2,281 |
|
||||
Convenience stores |
|
4,579 |
|
2,613 |
|
8,382 |
|
5,171 |
|
||||
Entertainment |
|
965 |
|
618 |
|
1,930 |
|
1,259 |
|
||||
Health and fitness |
|
1,356 |
|
1,347 |
|
2,757 |
|
2,595 |
|
||||
Home furnishings |
|
1,762 |
|
1,731 |
|
3,608 |
|
3,454 |
|
||||
Restaurants |
|
4,387 |
|
4,223 |
|
8,731 |
|
8,537 |
|
||||
Sporting goods |
|
1,403 |
|
1,396 |
|
2,805 |
|
2,792 |
|
||||
Theaters |
|
1,502 |
|
1,302 |
|
3,001 |
|
2,604 |
|
||||
Other non-reportable segments(1) |
|
6,836 |
|
6,937 |
|
13,496 |
|
13,761 |
|
||||
Reconciling items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Gain on sales of real estate acquired for resale |
|
296 |
|
1,126 |
|
572 |
|
1,491 |
|
||||
Interest and other |
|
30 |
|
52 |
|
141 |
|
82 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Total revenue |
|
$ |
36,505 |
|
$ |
33,782 |
|
$ |
72,024 |
|
$ |
66,503 |
|
(1) Consolidates 15 retail industry segments and properties owned by Crest Net.
|
|
Assets |
|
||||
As of: |
|
June 30, 2003 |
|
December 31, 2002 |
|
||
Segment real estate, net of depreciation and amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Automotive parts |
|
$ |
71,681 |
|
$ |
72,831 |
|
Automotive service |
|
96,169 |
|
87,436 |
|
||
Child care |
|
129,279 |
|
133,612 |
|
||
Consumer electronics |
|
34,450 |
|
34,950 |
|
||
Convenience stores |
|
164,457 |
|
124,394 |
|
||
Entertainment |
|
38,861 |
|
38,850 |
|
||
Health and fitness |
|
52,571 |
|
51,202 |
|
||
Home furnishings |
|
60,281 |
|
61,201 |
|
||
Restaurants |
|
120,653 |
|
123,233 |
|
||
Sporting goods |
|
49,762 |
|
49,165 |
|
||
Theaters |
|
53,276 |
|
53,755 |
|
||
Other non-reportable segments(1) |
|
210,897 |
|
207,549 |
|
||
Total net real estate |
|
1,082,337 |
|
1,038,178 |
|
||
Non-real estate assets |
|
36,777 |
|
42,052 |
|
||
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,119,114 |
|
$ |
1,080,230 |
|
(1) Consolidates 15 retail industry segments and properties owned by Crest Net.
10
12. Stock Option Plan
Effective January 1, 2002, we adopted the fair value recognition provisions of FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and beginning in 2002 started expensing the costs for all stock option awards granted, modified, or settled after January 1, 2002. Therefore, the cost related to stock option-based compensation included in the determination of net income available to common stockholders is less than that which would have been recognized if the fair value method had been applied to all stock option awards since the original effective date of Statement No. 123.
The following table illustrates the effect on net income available to common stockholders and earnings per share if the fair value method had been applied to all outstanding and unvested awards (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
Three |
|
Three |
|
Six |
|
Six |
|
||||
Net income available to common stockholders, as reported |
|
$ |
18,162 |
|
$ |
16,017 |
|
$ |
33,767 |
|
$ |
31,883 |
|
Add: Stock option-based compensation expense included in reported net income |
|
3 |
|
6 |
|
6 |
|
6 |
|
||||
Deduct: Total stock option-based compensation expense determined under fair value method for all awards, net of related tax effects |
|
(7 |
) |
(26 |
) |
(14 |
) |
(53 |
) |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Pro forma net income available to common stockholders |
|
$ |
18,158 |
|
$ |
15,997 |
|
$ |
33,759 |
|
$ |
31,836 |
|
Earnings per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
As reported basic |
|
$ |
0.52 |
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
$ |
0.97 |
|
$ |
0.96 |
|
As reported diluted |
|
$ |
0.52 |
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
$ |
0.96 |
|
$ |
0.96 |
|
Pro forma basic and diluted |
|
$ |
0.52 |
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
$ |
0.96 |
|
$ |
0.96 |
|
13. Commitments and Contingencies
In the ordinary course of our business, we are party to various legal actions which we believe are routine in nature and incidental to the operation of our business. We believe that the outcome of the proceedings will not have a material adverse effect upon our consolidated statements taken as a whole.
We have committed to pay estimated unfunded development costs of $5.8 million on properties under development at June 30, 2003.
11
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This quarterly report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. When used in this quarterly report, the words estimated, anticipated and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties, and assumptions about Realty Income Corporation, including, among other things:
Our anticipated growth strategies;
Our intention to acquire additional properties and the timing of these acquisitions;
Our intention to sell properties and the timing of these property sales;
Our intention to re-lease vacant properties;
Anticipated trends in our business, including trends in the market for long-term net leases of freestanding, single-tenant retail properties;
Future expenditures for development projects; and
Profitability of our subsidiary, Crest Net Lease, Inc.
Future events and actual results, financial and otherwise, may differ materially from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements. In particular, some of the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially are:
Our continued qualification as a real estate investment trust;
General business and economic conditions;
Competition;
Fluctuating interest rates;
Access to debt and equity capital markets;
Other risks inherent in the real estate business including tenant defaults, potential liability relating to environmental matters and illiquidity of real estate investments;
Changes in the tax laws of the United States of America: and
Acts of terrorism and war.
Additional factors that may cause risks and uncertainties include those discussed in the sections entitled Business and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002.
Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date that this quarterly report was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We undertake no obligation to publicly release the results of any revisions to these forward-looking statements that may be made to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this quarterly report or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. In light of these risks and uncertainties, the forward-looking events discussed in this quarterly report might not occur.
12
Realty Income Corporation, The Monthly Dividend Company ®, a Maryland corporation was organized to operate as an equity real estate investment trust, commonly referred to as a REIT. Our primary business objective is to generate dependable monthly cash distributions from a consistent and predictable level of funds from operations, or FFO, per share. Over the past 34 years, Realty Income and its predecessors have been acquiring and owning freestanding retail properties that generate rental revenue under long-term (primarily 15- to 20-year) lease agreements. The monthly distributions are supported by the cash flow from our portfolio of retail properties leased to regional and national retail chains.
We are a fully integrated, self-administered real estate company with in-house acquisition, leasing, legal, retail and real estate research, portfolio management and capital markets expertise. We seek to increase distributions to stockholders and FFO per share through both active portfolio management and the acquisition of additional properties. Our portfolio management focus includes:
Contractual rent increases on existing leases;
Rent increases at the termination of existing leases when market conditions permit; and
The active management of our property portfolio, including re-leasing of vacant properties and selective sales of properties.
Our acquisition of additional properties adheres to a focused strategy of primarily acquiring properties that are:
Freestanding, single-tenant, retail locations;
Leased to regional and national retail chains; and
Under long-term, net-lease agreements.
As of June 30, 2003, we owned a diversified portfolio:
Of 1,250 retail properties;
With an occupancy rate of 98.7%, or 1,234 properties occupied of the 1,250 properties in the portfolio;
Leased to 81 different retail chains;
Doing business in 26 separate retail industries;
Located in 48 states;
With approximately 10.2 million square feet of leasable space; and
With an average leasable retail space of 8,100 square feet.
Of the 1,250 properties in the portfolio, 1,245, or 99.6%, are single-tenant retail properties with the remaining five being multi-tenant properties. As of June 30, 2003, 1,230, or 98.8%, of the 1,245 single-tenant properties were leased with a weighted average remaining lease term (excluding extension options) of approximately 11.0 years.
In addition to our real estate portfolio, at June 30, 2003, Crest Net Lease owned three properties totaling $4.7 million. These properties are held for sale.
We typically acquire retail store properties leased under long-term leases with retail chain store operators. These transactions provide capital to the operators for continued expansion and other corporate purposes. Our acquisition and investment activities are concentrated in well-defined target markets and generally focus on middle-market retailers providing goods and services that satisfy basic consumer needs.
Our net-lease agreements generally:
Are for initial terms of 15 to 20 years;
Require the tenant to pay minimum monthly rents and property operating expenses (taxes, insurance and maintenance); and
13
Provide for future rent increases (typically subject to ceilings) based on increases in the consumer price index, fixed increases, or additional rent calculated as a percentage of the tenants gross sales above a specified level.
We believe that the long-term ownership of an actively managed, diversified portfolio of retail properties, under long-term, net-lease agreements, produces consistent, predictable income. Under a net-lease agreement, the tenant agrees to pay monthly rent and property operating expenses (taxes, maintenance and insurance) plus, typically, future rent increases (generally subject to ceilings) based on increases in the consumer price index, fixed increases or additional rent calculated as a percentage of the tenants gross sales above a specified level. We believe that long-term leases, coupled with the tenants responsibility for property expenses, generally produce a more predictable income stream than many other types of real estate portfolios, while continuing to offer the potential for growth in rental income.
We generally provide sale-leaseback financing primarily to less than investment grade retail chains. From 1970 through December 31, 2002, we acquired and leased back to regional and national retail chains 1,266 properties (including 116 properties that have been sold) and collected approximately 98% of the original contractual rent obligations on those properties (this information is updated annually at the end of each year.) We believe that within this market we can achieve an attractive risk-adjusted return on the financing we provide to retailers.
Issuance of 10-Year 5-3/8% Senior Unsecured Notes. In March 2003, we issued $100 million of 5-3/8% senior unsecured notes due 2013. The price to the investor for the notes was 99.509% of par. These securities have been rated BBB by Fitch Ratings, Baa2 by Moodys Investors Service and BBB- by Standard & Poors Ratings Group. The net proceeds from the offering were used to repay borrowings under our $250 million unsecured acquisition credit facility. After the application of the note offering proceeds in March, our credit facility was paid down to a zero balance.
Credit Ratings Upgrade. In February 2003, our credit ratings were upgraded by Moodys Investors Service. Our senior unsecured debt rating was raised to Baa2 from Baa3 and our preferred stock rating was raised to Baa3 from Ba1, with a stable outlook.
Net Income Available to Common Stockholders was $18.2 million in the second quarter of 2003 versus $16.0 million in the second quarter of 2002, an increase of $2.2 million. On a diluted per common share basis, net income was $0.52 per share for the second quarter of 2003 as compared to $0.48 per share for the second quarter of 2002. Net income available to common stockholders was $33.8 million in the first six months of 2003 and $31.9 million in the first six months of 2002. On a diluted per common share basis, net income was $0.96 per share for both the first six months of 2003 and 2002.
Funds from Operations. For the second quarter of 2003, FFO increased 3.9% to $23.9 million compared to $23.0 million for the same quarter in 2002. On a diluted per common share basis, FFO was $0.68 per share in the second quarter of 2003 compared to $0.69 per share for the second quarter in 2002, a slight decrease of 1.4%. In the first six months of 2003, our FFO increased 5.5% to $47.9 million as compared to $45.4 million for the first six months of 2002. FFO was $1.37 per share for both the first six months of 2003 and 2002. See our discussion of FFO, including a reconciliation of FFO to net income, in this Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
In the second quarter of 2003, Crest Net generated $157,000 in FFO for Realty Income compared to $901,000 in the same quarter of 2002, a decrease of $744,000. On a diluted per common share basis, in the second quarter of 2003 Crest Net contributed FFO of $0.004 compared to $0.03 in the same period of 2002. In the first six months of 2003, Crest Net generated $242,000 in FFO for Realty Income compared to $1.26 million in the same period of 2002, a decrease of $1.0 million. On a diluted per common share basis, in the first six months of 2003, Crest
14
Net contributed FFO of $0.01 compared to $0.04 in the same period of 2002. The future contribution, if any, to our FFO by Crest Net will depend on the timing and the number of property acquisitions and sales it achieves, if any, in a given period.
Acquisition of Properties during 2003. In the second quarter of 2003, we acquired 25 properties and invested $34.5 million in new properties and properties under development with an initial weighted average contractual lease rate of 11.1%. These 25 properties are located in five states and are 100% leased with an initial average lease length of 20.0 years.
In the first six months of 2003, we acquired 67 properties (the New Properties) located in ten states and invested $67.5 million in the New Properties and properties under development, which includes investments of $4.0 million for properties acquired before 2003 that were under development. Estimated unfunded development costs on properties under development at June 30, 2003 totaled $5.8 million. At June 30, 2003, three of the New Properties were leased and under development, pursuant to contracts under which the tenants agreed to develop the properties (with development costs funded by Realty Income) with rent scheduled to begin in the second half of 2003.
The initial weighted average annual unleveraged return on the $67.5 million invested in 2003 is estimated to be 11.0%, computed as estimated contractual net operating income (which in the case of a net-leased property is equal to the base rent or, in the case of properties under development, the estimated base rent under the lease) for the first year of each lease, divided by the estimated total costs. Since it is possible that a tenant could default on the payment of contractual rent, we cannot assure you that the actual return on the funds invested will remain at the percentages listed above.
The New Properties are leased under net-lease agreements to eight different retail chains in five industries: automotive service, convenience stores, restaurants, sporting goods and travel plazas. During the first six months of 2003, we added one new industry (travel plazas) to our portfolio. The New Properties will contain approximately 231,600 leasable square feet and are 100% leased under net leases with an average initial lease term of 20.2 years.
In the second quarter of 2003, we capitalized costs of $231,000 on existing properties in our portfolio, $119,000 for re-leasing costs and $112,000 for building improvements. In the first six months of 2003, we capitalized costs of $313,000 on existing properties in our portfolio, $181,000 for re-leasing costs and $132,000 for building improvements.
In addition, Crest Net invested $2.5 million during the second quarter of 2003 in one new retail property and $3.8 million during the first six months of 2003 in two new retail properties and properties under development.
Sales of Investment Properties. During the second quarter of 2003, we sold ten properties for $5.5 million, which resulted in a gain of $2.6 million. For the first six months of 2003, we sold 14 properties and exchanged excess land parcels from three properties for $9.7 million, which resulted in a gain of $2.7 million. The 14 properties sold consisted of six child care facilities, five restaurants, two home improvement centers, and one other property. The land sales were on three convenience store locations. These gains are included in discontinued operations. The net proceeds from the sale of these properties were used to repay outstanding indebtedness on our credit facility and to invest in new properties. At June 30, 2003, $1.0 million of sale proceeds were held in like-kind exchange escrow. These funds were invested in a new retail property in July 2003.
Crest Net. During the second quarter of 2003, our wholly-owned subsidiary, Crest Net sold one property from its inventory for $1.5 million, which resulted in a gain of $296,000. In the first six months of 2003, Crest has sold three properties for $4.2 million, which resulted in a gain of $572,000. At June 30, 2003, investments in three properties owned by Crest Net totaled $4.7 million, which is included on our consolidated balance sheet in real estate held for sale, net. The financial statements of Crest Net are consolidated into Realty Incomes financial statements. All material intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
15
Increase in Monthly Distributions to Common Stockholders. We continue our 33-year policy of paying distributions monthly. Monthly distributions per share were increased $0.00125 in January 2003 to $0.195, in April 2003 to $0.19625 and in July 2003 to $0.1975 per share. The increase in July was our 23rd consecutive quarterly increase and 25th increase since our listing in 1994 on the New York Stock Exchange, or NYSE. In June and July 2003, we declared distributions of $0.1975 per share, which were paid on July 15, 2003 and payable on August 15, 2003, respectively.
The monthly distribution of $0.1975 per share represents a current annualized distribution of $2.37 per share, and an annualized distribution yield of approximately 6.1% based on a closing price on August 5, 2003 of $38.75 for our common stock, traded on the NYSE. Although we expect to continue our policy of paying monthly distributions, we cannot guarantee that we will maintain the current level of distributions, that we will continue our pattern of increasing distributions per share, or what the actual distribution yield will be for any future period.
Other Information
Realty Income and Crest Net together had 56 employees as of August 6, 2003.
Realty Incomes common stock is listed on the NYSE under the ticker symbol O, our central index key, or CIK, number is 726728 and cusip number is 756109-104.
Realty Incomes 9 3/8% Class B cumulative redeemable preferred stock is listed on the NYSE under the ticker symbol OprB and its cusip number is 756109-302.
Realty Incomes 9 1/2% Class C cumulative redeemable preferred stock is listed on the NYSE under the ticker symbol OprC and its cusip number is 756109-500.
Realty Incomes 8.25% Monthly Income Senior Notes, due 2008, are listed on the NYSE under the ticker symbol OUI. The cusip number of these notes is 756109-203.
We maintain an Internet website at www.realtyincome.com. On our website we make available, free of charge, copies of our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file these reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash Reserves. Realty Income is organized to operate as an equity REIT that acquires and leases properties and distributes to stockholders, in the form of monthly cash distributions, a substantial portion of its net cash flow generated from leases on its retail properties. We intend to retain an appropriate amount of cash as working capital. At June 30, 2003, we had cash and cash equivalents totaling $4.7 million.
We believe that our cash and cash equivalents on hand, cash provided from operating activities and borrowing capacity is sufficient to meet our liquidity needs for the foreseeable future. We intend, however, to use additional sources of capital to fund property acquisitions and to repay our credit facility.
$250 Million Bank Credit Facility. We have a $250 million revolving, unsecured credit facility that expires in October 2005. Realty Incomes current investment grade credit ratings provide for financing under the $250 million credit facility at the London Interbank Offered Rate, commonly referred to as LIBOR, plus 90 basis points with a facility fee of 20 basis points, for all-in drawn pricing of 110 basis points over LIBOR. At
16
August 5, 2003, we had borrowing capacity of $201.3 million available on our credit facility and an outstanding balance of $48.7 million with an effective interest rate of 2.0%.
The credit facility is expected to be used to acquire additional retail properties and for other corporate purposes. Any additional borrowings will increase our exposure to interest rate risk. We have no mortgage debt on any of our properties.
Notes Outstanding. In March 2003, we issued $100 million of 5-3/8% senior unsecured notes due 2013 (the 2013 Notes). The 2013 Notes were sold at 99.509% of par. The proceeds from this offering were used to repay borrowings under our unsecured acquisition credit facility. Interest on the 2013 Notes is paid semiannually.
In January 1999, we issued $20 million of 8% senior notes due 2009 (the 2009 Notes). Interest on the 2009 Notes is payable semiannually.
In October 1998, we issued $100 million of 8-1/4% Monthly Income Senior Notes due 2008 (the 2008 Notes). Interest on the 2008 Notes is payable monthly.
In May 1997, we issued $110 million of 7-3/4% senior notes due 2007 (the 2007 Notes). Interest on the 2007 Notes is payable semiannually.
All of these notes contain various covenants, including: (i) a limitation on incurrence of any debt which would cause our debt to total assets ratio to exceed 60%; (ii) a limitation on incurrence of any secured debt which would cause our secured debt to total assets ratio to exceed 40%; (iii) a limitation on incurrence of any debt which would cause our debt service coverage ratio to be less than 1.5 times; and (iv) the maintenance at all times of total unencumbered assets not less than 150% of our outstanding unsecured debt. We have been in compliance with these covenants since each of the notes were issued.
Table of Debt Obligations
(as of June 30, 2003, in millions)
Year of Maturity |
|
Credit Facility |
|
Notes |
|
Totals |
|
|||
2005 |
|
$ |
52.1 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
52.1 |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
110.0 |
|
110.0 |
|
|||
2008 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
100.0 |
|
|||
2009 |
|
|
|
20.0 |
|
20.0 |
|
|||
2013 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
100.0 |
|
|||
Totals |
|
$ |
52.1 |
|
$ |
330.0 |
|
$ |
382.1 |
|
Universal Shelf Registration. In December 2002, we filed a universal shelf registration statement with the SEC registering the issuance of up to $500 million in aggregate value of common stock, preferred stock and debt securities. This registration statement was declared effective by the SEC in January 2003. At August 6, 2003, $400 million remained available for issuance under our universal shelf registration statement.
Conservative Capital Structure. We believe that our stockholders are best served by a conservative capital structure. Therefore, we seek to maintain a conservative debt level on our balance sheet and solid interest and fixed charge coverage ratios. At August 5, 2003, our total outstanding credit facility borrowings and outstanding notes were $378.7 million or approximately 20.6% of our total market capitalization of $1.84 billion. We define our total market capitalization as the sum of the:
Shares of our common stock outstanding of 35,023,437 multiplied by the last reported sales price of our common stock on the NYSE on August 5, 2003 of $38.75 per share;
Liquidation value of the Class B Preferred Stock of $68.6 million;
Liquidation value of the Class C Preferred Stock of $34.5 million; and
Outstanding borrowings on the credit facility and outstanding notes at August 5, 2003.
17
Historically, we have met our long-term capital needs through the issuance of common stock, preferred stock and long-term unsecured notes. Over the long term, we believe that the majority of our future securities issuances should be in the form of common stock, however, we may issue additional preferred stock or debt securities from time to time. We may issue common stock when we believe that our share price is at a level that allows for the proceeds of any offering to be accretively invested into additional properties. In addition, we may issue common stock to permanently finance properties that were financed by our credit facility or debt securities. However, we cannot assure you that we will have access to the capital markets at terms that are acceptable to us.
Credit Agency Ratings. We are currently assigned investment grade corporate credit ratings, on our senior unsecured notes, from Fitch Ratings, Moodys Investors Service, Inc. and Standard & Poors Ratings Group. Currently, Fitch Ratings has assigned a rating of BBB, Moodys has assigned a rating of Baa2 and Standard & Poors has assigned a rating of BBB- to our senior notes. These ratings could change based upon, among other things, our results of operations and financial condition.
We also have received credit ratings from the same rating agencies on our preferred stock. Fitch Ratings has assigned a rating of BBB-, Moodys has assigned a rating of Baa3 and Standard & Poors has assigned a rating of BB+. These ratings could change based upon, among other things, our results of operations and financial condition.
No Off Balance Sheet Arrangements or Unconsolidated Investments. Realty Income and its subsidiaries have no unconsolidated or off-balance sheet investments in variable interest entities or off-balance sheet financing, nor do we engage in trading activities involving energy or commodity contracts or other derivative instruments.
Distributions. We pay monthly cash distributions to our common stockholders. During the first six months of 2003 we paid aggregate distributions to our common stockholders of $41.1 million.
We pay quarterly cash distributions to our Class B preferred stockholders. During the first six months of 2003 we paid aggregate distributions to our Class B preferred stockholders of $3.2 million.
We pay monthly cash distributions to our Class C preferred stockholders. During the first six months of 2003 we paid aggregate distributions to our Class C preferred stockholders of $1.6 million.
In order to maintain our tax status as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, we generally are required to distribute dividends to our stockholders aggregating annually at least 90% of our REIT taxable income (determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and by excluding net capital gains) and we are subject to income tax to the extent we distribute less than 100% of our REIT taxable income (including net capital gains). In 2002, our distributions totaled approximately 107.1% of our REIT taxable income. Our estimated REIT taxable income reflects non-cash deductions for depreciation and amortization. We intend to continue to make distributions to our stockholders that are sufficient to meet this distribution requirement and that will reduce our exposure to income taxes. Our distributions to common stockholders were 85.7% of our funds from operations for the first six months of 2003.
Our future distributions will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend upon, among other things, our results of operations, our funds from operations, cash flow from operations, financial condition and capital requirements, the annual distribution requirements under the REIT provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, our debt service requirements and any other factors the Board of Directors may deem relevant. In addition, our credit facility contains financial covenants which could limit the amount of distributions payable by us in the event of a deterioration in our results of operations or financial condition, and which prohibits the payment of distributions on the common or preferred stock in the event that we fail to pay when due (subject to any applicable grace period) any principal or interest on borrowings under our credit facility.
18
Critical Accounting Polices. Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America. Our consolidated financial statements are the basis for our discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations. Completing our consolidated financial statements requires us to make a number of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported values and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. We believe that we have made these estimates and assumptions in an appropriate manner in a way that accurately reflects our financial condition. We continually test and evaluate these estimates and assumptions using our historical knowledge of the business, as well as other factors to ensure that they are reasonable for reporting purposes. However actual results may differ from these estimates and assumptions.
In order to prepare our consolidated financial statements according to the rules and guidelines set forth by generally accepted accounting principles, many subjective judgments must be made with regard to critical accounting polices. One of these judgments includes our estimates for useful lives in determining our depreciation expense for our properties. Depreciation of buildings and improvements is computed using the straight-line method over an estimated useful life of 25 years. If we use a shorter or longer estimated useful life it could have a material impact on our results of operations. We believe that 25 years is an appropriate estimate of useful life. No depreciation has been recorded on Crest Nets properties because they are held for sale.
Another significant judgment that must be made is the possible impairment losses taken on our properties when events or change in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. Generally, a provision is made for impairment loss if estimated future operating cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) plus estimated disposition proceeds (undiscounted) are less than the current book value. Impairment losses are measured as the amount by which the current book value of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. If a property is held for sale, it is carried at the lower of cost or estimated fair value, less costs to sell. The carrying value of our real estate is the largest component of our consolidated balance sheet. If events should occur that required us to reduce the carrying value of our real estate by recording provisions for impairment losses, it could have a material impact on our results of operations.
The following is a comparison of our results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003 to the three and six months ended June 30, 2002.
Rental revenue was $36.2 million for the second quarter of 2003 versus $32.6 million for the second quarter of 2002, an increase of $3.6 million, or 11.0%. The $3.6 million increase in rental revenue is attributable to:
The 67 retail properties acquired in the first six months of 2003, which generated revenue of $1.2 million;
The 108 retail properties acquired in 2002, which generated revenue of $3.3 million in the second quarter of 2003 compared to $707,000 in the second quarter of 2002, an increase of $2.6 million;
Same store rents generated on 1,032 leased properties owned in all of both the second quarters of 2003 and 2002 increased by $429,000, or 1.4%, to $30.90 million from $30.47 million;
Properties owned by Crest Net, which generated revenue of $134,000 in the second quarter of 2003 compared to $480,000 in the second quarter of 2002, a decrease of $346,000;
Development properties acquired before 2002 that started paying rent in 2002, properties that were vacant during part of 2002 or 2003 and lease termination settlements generated revenue of $722,000 in the second quarter of 2003 compared to $929,000 in the same quarter of 2002, a decrease of $207,000; and
A decrease in straight-line rent of $32,000 in the second quarter of 2003 as compared to the second quarter of 2002.
19
Rental revenue was $71.3 million for the first six months of 2003 versus $64.9 million for the first six months of 2002, an increase of $6.4 million, or 9.9%. The $6.4 million increase in rental revenue is attributable to:
The 67 retail properties acquired in the first six months of 2003, which generated revenue of $1.3 million;
The 108 retail properties acquired in 2002, which generated revenue of $6.53 million in the first six months of 2003 compared to $765,000 in the first six months of 2002, an increase of $5.8 million;
Same store rents generated on 1,032 leased properties owned in all of both the first six months of 2003 and 2002 increased by $619,000, or 1.0%, to $61.64 million from $61.02 million;
Properties owned by Crest Net, which generated revenue of $221,000 in the first six months of 2003 compared to $954,000 in the first six months of 2002, a decrease of $733,000;
Development properties acquired before 2002 that started paying rent in 2002, properties that were vacant during part of 2002 or 2003 and lease termination settlements generated revenue of $1.76 million in the first six months of 2003 compared to $1.72 million in the same period of 2002, an increase of $40,000; and
A decrease in straight-line rent of $579,000 in the first six months of 2003 as compared to the first six months of 2002.
Of the 1,250 properties in the portfolio as of June 30, 2003, 1,245 are single-tenant properties with the remaining five properties being multi-tenant properties. Of the 1,245 single-tenant properties, 1,230, or 98.8%, were net leased with a weighted average remaining lease term (excluding extension options) of approximately 11.0 years at June 30, 2003. Of our 1,230 leased single-tenant properties, 1,163 or 94.6% were under leases that provide for increases in rents through:
Base rent increases tied to a consumer price index with adjustment ceilings;
Overage rent based on a percentage of the tenants gross sales;
Fixed increases; or
A combination of two or more of the above rent provisions.
Percentage rent, which is included in rental revenue during the second quarter of 2003 and 2002, was $87,000 and $70,000, respectively. Percentage rent, which is included in rental revenue during the first six months of 2003 and 2002, was $134,000 and $215,000, respectively.
Our portfolio of retail real estate leased primarily under net leases to regional and national retail chains continues to perform well and provides dependable lease revenue supporting the payment of monthly dividends to our stockholders. As of June 30, 2003, our portfolio of 1,250 retail properties was 98.7% leased with 16 properties available for lease. Transactions to lease or sell ten of the 16 properties at June 30, 2003 were underway or completed as of August 1, 2003. We anticipate these transactions to be completed during the next six months; although we cannot guarantee that all of these properties can be sold or leased within this period. It has been our experience that approximately 1% to 3% of our property portfolio will be unleased at any given time; however, we cannot assure you that the number of unleased properties will not exceed these levels.
Gain on sales of real estate acquired for resale. During the second quarter of 2003, Crest Net sold one property for $1.5 million, which resulted in a gain of $296,000. During the second quarter of 2002, Crest Net sold eight properties for $9.0 million, which resulted in a gain of $1.1 million.
For the first six months of 2003, Crest Net sold three properties for $4.2 million, which resulted in a gain of $572,000. During the first six months of 2002, Crest Net sold 11 properties for $11.7 million, which resulted in a gain of $1.5 million. All gains on sales of real estate acquired for resale are reported before income taxes.
At June 30, 2003, Crest Net had $4.7 million invested in three properties, which are held for sale. Our goal is for Crest Net to carry an average inventory of $20 to $25 million in real estate. We anticipate Crest Nets inventory level will increase during 2003. Crest Net generates an earnings spread on the difference between the lease payments it receives on the properties held in inventory and the cost of capital used to acquire properties. It is our belief that at this level of inventory, earnings will more than cover the ongoing expenses of Crest Net.
20
Interest Expense. The following is a summary of the five components of interest expense (dollars in thousands):
For the three months ended June 30, |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
Net Change |
|
|||
Interest on outstanding credit facilities and notes |
|
$ |
6,131 |
|
$ |
5,286 |
|
$ |
845 |
|
Amortization of settlements on treasury lock agreements |
|
189 |
|
189 |
|
|
|
|||
Credit facility commitment fees |
|
127 |
|
128 |
|
(1 |
) |
|||
Amortization of credit facility origination costs and deferred bond financing costs |
|
365 |
|
280 |
|
85 |
|
|||
Interest capitalized |
|
(194 |
) |
(80 |
) |
(114 |
) |
|||
Interest expense |
|
$ |
6,618 |
|
$ |
5,803 |
|
$ |
815 |
|
Credit facilities and notes outstanding |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
Net Change |
|
|||
Average outstanding balances (in thousands) |
|
$ |
365,350 |
|
$ |
320,474 |
|
$ |
44,876 |
|
Average interest rates |
|
6.73 |
% |
6.62 |
% |
0.11 |
% |
|||
Interest on outstanding credit facilities and notes increased by $845,000 in the second quarter of 2003 as compared to the second quarter of 2002 due to higher average outstanding balances.
For the six months ended June 30, |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
Net Change |
|
|||
Interest on outstanding credit facilities and notes |
|
$ |
11,566 |
|
$ |
10,474 |
|
$ |
1,092 |
|
Amortization of settlements on treasury lock agreements |
|
378 |
|
378 |
|
|
|
|||
Credit facility commitment fees |
|
254 |
|
256 |
|
(2 |
) |
|||
Amortization of credit facility origination costs and deferred bond financing costs |
|
703 |
|
556 |
|
147 |
|
|||
Interest capitalized |
|
(319 |
) |
(256 |
) |
(63 |
) |
|||
Interest expense |
|
$ |
12,582 |
|
$ |
11,408 |
|
$ |
1,174 |
|
Credit facilities and notes outstanding For the six months ended June 30, |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
Net Change |
|
|||
Average outstanding balances (in thousands) |
|
$ |
351,653 |
|
$ |
314,816 |
|
$ |
36,837 |
|
Average interest rates |
|
6.63 |
% |
6.71 |
% |
(0.08% |
) |
|||
Interest on outstanding credit facilities and notes increased by $1.1 million in the first six months of 2003 as compared to the first six months of 2002 due to higher average outstanding balances.
At August 5, 2003, the weighted average interest rate on our:
Credit facility borrowings of $48.7 million was 2.00%;
Notes payable of $330 million was 7.20%; and
Combined outstanding notes and credit facility borrowings totaling $378.7 million was 6.53%.
Interest Coverage Ratio. Our interest coverage ratio for the three months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 was 5.0 times and 5.5 times, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, our interest coverage ratio was 5.2 times and 5.5 times, respectively. Interest coverage ratio is calculated as: the interest coverage amount (as calculated below) divided by interest expense. We consider interest coverage ratio to be an appropriate supplemental measure of a companys ability to meet its interest requirements. Our calculation of interest coverage ratio may be different from the calculation used by other companies and, therefore, comparability may be limited. This information should not be considered as an alternative to any GAAP liquidity measures.
21
The following is a reconciliation of net cash provided by operating activities to our interest coverage amount (dollars in thousands):
|
|
Three |
|
Three |
|
Six |
|
Six |
|
||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
25,827 |
|
$ |
31,793 |
|
$ |
56,818 |
|
$ |
58,862 |
|
Interest expense |
|
6,618 |
|
5,803 |
|
12,582 |
|
11,408 |
|
||||
Income taxes |
|
256 |
|
598 |
|
422 |
|
886 |
|
||||
Investment in real estate acquired for resale |
|
2,550 |
|
1,082 |
|
3,776 |
|
4,462 |
|
||||
Proceeds from sales of real estate acquired for resale |
|
(1,503 |
) |
(8,985 |
) |
(4,250 |
) |
(11,729 |
) |
||||
Gain on sales of real estate acquired for resale |
|
296 |
|
1,126 |
|
572 |
|
1,491 |
|
||||
Amortization of deferred stock compensation |
|
(240 |
) |
(153 |
) |
(461 |
) |
(284 |
) |
||||
Changes in assets and liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Accounts receivable and other assets |
|
(761 |
) |
(549 |
) |
(2,447 |
) |
(2,496 |
) |
||||
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
190 |
|
1,135 |
|
(1,189 |
) |
(13 |
) |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Interest coverage amount |
|
$ |
33,233 |
|
$ |
31,850 |
|
$ |
65,823 |
|
$ |
62,587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Divided by interest expense |
|
$ |
6,618 |
|
$ |
5,803 |
|
$ |
12,582 |
|
$ |
11,408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest coverage ratio |
|
5.0 |
|
5.5 |
|
5.2 |
|
5.5 |
|
Fixed Coverage Ratio. Our fixed coverage ratio for the three months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 was 3.7 times and 3.9 times, respectively. Our fixed coverage ratio for both the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 was 3.8 times. Fixed coverage ratio is calculated in exactly the same manner as interest coverage ratio, except that preferred stock dividends are also added to the denominator. We consider a fixed coverage ratio to be an appropriate supplemental measure of a companys ability to make its interest and preferred stock dividend payments. Our calculation of the fixed coverage ratio may be different from the calculation used by other companies and, therefore, comparability may be limited. This information should not be considered as an alternative to any GAAP liquidity measures.
Depreciation and amortization was $8.3 million in the second quarter of 2003 versus $7.4 million in the second quarter of 2002. Depreciation and amortization was $16.3 million for the first six months in 2003 versus $14.7 million in the first six months of 2002. The increase in 2003 was primarily due to the acquisition of properties during 2002 and 2003 which was offset by property sales during the same period.
General and administrative expenses increased to $2.7 million in the second quarter of 2003 versus $2.3 million in the same quarter of 2002. General and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenue increased to 7.4% in the second quarter of 2003 as compared to 7.0% in the same quarter of 2002. General and administrative expenses increased during the second quarter and first six months of 2003 primarily due to increases in corporate insurance, payroll and staffing costs Included in general and administrative expenses are $71,000 and $88,000 of expenses attributable to Crest Net in the second quarter of 2003 and 2002, respectively.
General and administrative expenses increased to $5.5 million in the first six months of 2003 as compared to $4.7 million in the first six months of 2002. General and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenue increased to 7.6% in the first six months of 2003 as compared to 7.1% in the same period of 2002. Included in general and administrative expenses are $243,000 and $284,000 of expenses attributable to Crest Net in the first six months of 2003 and 2002, respectively.
We had 56 employees at August 1, 2003 compared to 53 employees at March 1, 2002.
22
Property expenses are broken down into costs associated with non-net leased multi-tenant properties, unleased single-tenant properties and general portfolio expenses. Expenses related to the multi-tenant and unleased single-tenant properties include, but are not limited to, property taxes, maintenance, insurance, utilities, property inspections, bad debt expense and legal fees. General portfolio costs include, but are not limited to, insurance, legal, property inspections and title search fees. At June 30, 2003, 16 unleased properties were available for sale or lease, as compared to 27 at December 31, 2002 and 19 at June 30, 2002.
Property expenses were $604,000 in the second quarter of 2003 and $525,000 in the second quarter of 2002. The $79,000 increase in property expenses is primarily attributable to an increase in property taxes associated with properties available for lease. Additional property expenses of $134,000 are included in discontinued operations for the second quarter of 2003 and $141,000 in the second quarter of 2002.
Property expenses were $1.26 million in the first six months of 2003 and $1.13 million in the first six months of 2002. The $123,000 increase in property expenses is primarily attributable to an increase in property taxes associated with properties available for lease. Additional property expenses of $178,000 are included in discontinued operations for the first six months of 2003 and $199,000 in the comparable period of 2002.
Income taxes decreased $342,000 to $256,000 in the second quarter of 2003 versus $598,000 in the second quarter of 2002. The decrease in 2003 is due to a decrease in Crest Net income taxes. Crest Net taxes were lower in the second quarter and first six months of 2003 as compared to the comparable periods in 2002 because Crest Nets net income was lower in the second quarter and first six months of 2003 as compared to the comparable periods in 2002. The following is a summary of our income taxes (dollars in thousands):
For the three months ended June 30, |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
Net Change |
|
|||
Realty Incomes state and local income taxes |
|
$ |
136 |
|
$ |
124 |
|
$ |
12 |
|
Crest Nets income taxes |
|
120 |
|
474 |
|
(354 |
) |
|||
Income taxes |
|
$ |
256 |
|
$ |
598 |
|
$ |
(342 |
) |
For the first six months of 2003, income taxes decreased by $464,000 to $422,000 from $886,000 in the first six months of 2002. The following is a summary of our income taxes (dollars in thousands):
For the six months ended June 30, |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
Net Change |
|
|||
Realty Incomes state and local income taxes |
|
$ |
271 |
|
$ |
248 |
|
$ |
23 |
|
Crest Nets income taxes |
|
151 |
|
638 |
|
(487 |
) |
|||
Income taxes |
|
$ |
422 |
|
$ |
886 |
|
$ |
(464 |
) |
Gain on sales of investment properties. During the second quarter of 2003, we sold ten investment properties for $5.5 million, which resulted in a gain of $2.6 million. During the second quarter of 2002, we sold ten investment properties for $3.8 million, which resulted in a gain of $1.3 million. These gains are included in discontinued operations.
During the first six months of 2003, we sold 14 properties and three excess land parcels from three existing properties for $9.7 million, which resulted in a gain of $2.7 million. This gain is included in discontinued operations. During the first six months of 2002, we sold 16 investment properties for $7.2 million, which resulted in a gain of $2.4 million. Of this gain, $2.1 million is included in discontinued operations.
We have an active portfolio management program that incorporates the sale of assets when we believe the reinvestment of the sale proceeds will generate higher returns, enhance the credit quality of our real estate portfolio or extend our average remaining lease term. At June 30, 2003, we classified real estate with a carrying amount of $11.8 million as held for sale, which includes $4.7 million in properties owned by Crest Net. Additionally, we anticipate selling properties from our portfolio that have not yet been specifically identified. We anticipate we will receive between $15 million and $30 million in proceeds from the sale of
23
investment properties during the next 12 months and we intend to invest these proceeds into new property acquisitions. However, we cannot guarantee that we will sell properties during the next 12 months.
Discontinued operations. The operations of 11 properties listed as held for sale at June 30, 2003, plus properties sold in 2002 and 2003 have been classified as discontinued operations.
The following is a summary of our discontinued operations (dollars in thousands):
|
|
Three |
|
Three |
|
Six |
|
Six |
|
||||
Rental revenue |
|
$ |
173 |
|
$ |
1,082 |
|
$ |
683 |
|
$ |
2,153 |
|
Interest and other revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
1 |
|
||||
Gain on sales of investment properties |
|
2,550 |
|
1,305 |
|
2,716 |
|
2,079 |
|
||||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
(54 |
) |
(223 |
) |
(141 |
) |
(470 |
) |
||||
Property expenses |
|
(134 |
) |
(141 |
) |
(178 |
) |
(199 |
) |
||||
Provisions for impairment loss |
|
|
|
(670 |
) |
(500 |
) |
(830 |
) |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Income from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
2,535 |
|
$ |
1,353 |
|
$ |
2,585 |
|
$ |
2,734 |
|
Provisions for impairment loss. No impairment losses were taken in the second quarter of 2003 as compared to impairment losses of $670,000 that were recorded in the second quarter of 2002. For the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, impairment losses of $500,000 and $830,000 were recorded, respectively. These impairment losses are included in discontinued operations.
Preferred stock dividends. We declared preferred stock dividends of $2.4 million in the second quarters of both 2003 and 2002 and $4.9 million for the both the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002.
Net income available to common stockholders was $18.2 million in the second quarter of 2003 and $16.0 million in the second quarter of 2002, an increase of $2.2 million. Net income available to common stockholders increased to $33.8 million for the first six months of 2003 as compared to $31.9 million for the first six months of 2002.
The calculation to determine net income available to common stockholders includes gains and losses from the sale of investment properties. The amount of gains and losses varies from period to period based on the timing of property sales and can significantly impact net income available to common stockholders.
The gain recognized from the sales of investment properties during the second quarter of 2003 was $2.55 million as compared to $1.31 million during the second quarter of 2002, an increase of $1.24 million. The gain recognized from the sales of investment properties during the first six months of 2003 was $2.7 million as compared to $2.4 million during the first six months 2002, an increase of $297,000.
24
FFO for the second quarter of 2003 increased by $0.9 million, or 3.9%, to $23.9 million versus $23.0 million in the second quarter of 2002. FFO for the first six months of 2003 increased by $2.5 million, or 5.5%, to $47.9 million as compared to $45.4 million for the first six months of 2002. The following is a reconciliation of net income available to common stockholders to FFO, and information regarding distributions paid and diluted weighted average number of common shares outstanding (dollars in thousands):
|
|
Three |
|
Three |
|
Six |
|
Six |
|
||||
Net income available to common stockholders |
|
$ |
18,162 |
|
$ |
16,017 |
|
$ |
33,767 |
|
$ |
31,883 |
|
Depreciation and amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Continuing operations |
|
8,265 |
|
7,416 |
|
16,271 |
|
14,673 |
|
||||
Discontinued operations |
|
54 |
|
223 |
|
141 |
|
470 |
|
||||
Depreciation of furniture, fixtures and equipment |
|
(28 |
) |
(34 |
) |
(57 |
) |
(67 |
) |
||||
Provisions for impairment loss - discontinued operations |
|
|
|
670 |
|
500 |
|
830 |
|
||||
Gain on sales of investment properties: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(340 |
) |
||||
Discontinued operations |
|
(2,550 |
) |
(1,305 |
) |
(2,716 |
) |
(2,079 |
) |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Total funds from operations |
|
$ |
23,903 |
|
$ |
22,987 |
|
$ |
47,906 |
|
$ |
45,370 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions paid to common stockholders |
|
$ |
20,612 |
|
$ |
19,114 |
|
$ |
41,062 |
|
$ |
37,934 |
|
FFO in excess of distributions to common stockholders |
|
$ |
3,291 |
|
$ |
3,873 |
|
$ |
6,844 |
|
$ |
7,436 |
|
FFO per common share, basic and diluted |
|
$ |
0.68 |
|
$ |
0.69 |
|
$ |
1.37 |
|
$ |
1.37 |
|
Weighted average number of common shares used for computation per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Basic |
|
35,009,554 |
|
33,310,413 |
|
34,987,332 |
|
33,178,176 |
|
||||
Diluted |
|
35,059,608 |
|
33,368,359 |
|
35,032,944 |
|
33,230,817 |
|
We define FFO, a non-GAAP measure, consistent with the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts definition, as net income available to common stockholders, plus depreciation and amortization of assets uniquely significant to the real estate industry, reduced by gains and increased by losses on (i) sales of investment property and provisions for impairment and (ii) extraordinary items.
We consider FFO to be an appropriate supplemental measure of a REITs operating performance as it is based on a net income analysis of property portfolio performance that excludes non-cash items such as depreciation. The historical accounting convention used for real estate assets requires straight-line depreciation of buildings and improvements, which implies that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. Since real estate values historically rise and fall with market conditions, presentations of operating results for a REIT, using historical accounting for depreciation, could be less informative. The use of FFO is recommended by the REIT industry as a supplemental performance measure. In addition, FFO is used as a measure of our compliance with the financial covenants of our credit facility.
We also evaluate adjusted FFO, or AFFO, which further adjusts by adding back other non-cash charges that reduce net income in accordance with GAAP and deducts such costs as leasing commissions as well as reversing the effect of straight-line rent. We consider AFFO to be an appropriate supplemental measure of our performance because it provides analysts and investors with an indicator of our ability to incur and service debt and to pay dividends.
25
Presentation of this information is intended to assist the reader in comparing the operating performance of different REITs, although it should be noted that not all REITs calculate FFO and AFFO the same way; therefore, comparisons with other REITs may not be meaningful. Furthermore, FFO and AFFO are not necessarily indicative of cash flow available to fund cash needs and should not be considered as an alternative to net income as an indication of Realty Incomes performance. In addition, FFO and AFFO should not be considered as an alternative to reviewing our cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities as a measure of liquidity, of our ability to make cash distributions or of our ability to pay interest payments.
AFFO for the second quarter of 2003 increased by $1.3 million, or 5.7%, to $24.3 million versus $23.0 million in the second quarter of 2002. For the six months ended June 30, 2003 AFFO increased by $3.7 million, or 8.2%, to $48.9 million as compared to $45.2 million for the same period in 2002. The following is a reconciliation of FFO to AFFO. The adjustments are for non-cash items and capitalized expenditures on existing properties in our portfolio (dollars in thousands):
|
|
Three |
|
Three |
|
Six 6/30/03 |
|
Six |
|
||||
Funds from operations (1) |
|
$ |
23,903 |
|
$ |
22,987 |
|
$ |
47,906 |
|
$ |
45,370 |
|
Amortization of settlements on treasury lock agreements |
|
189 |
|
189 |
|
378 |
|
378 |
|
||||
Amortization of deferred financing costs (2) |
|
183 |
|
145 |
|
337 |
|
289 |
|
||||
Amortization of stock compensation |
|
238 |
|
152 |
|
462 |
|
284 |
|
||||
Capitalized leasing costs and commissions |
|
(119 |
) |
(76 |
) |
(181 |
) |
(230 |
) |
||||
Capitalized building improvements |
|
(112 |
) |
(405 |
) |
(132 |
) |
(427 |
) |
||||
Straight line rent (3) |
|
11 |
|
(21 |
) |
161 |
|
(418 |
) |
||||
Total adjusted funds from operations |
|
$ |
24,293 |
|
$ |
22,971 |
|
$ |
48,931 |
|
$ |
45,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions paid to common stockholders |
|
$ |
20,612 |
|
$ |
19,114 |
|
$ |
41,062 |
|
$ |
37,934 |
|
AFFO in excess of distributions to common stockholders |
|
$ |
3,681 |
|
$ |
3,857 |
|
$ |
7,869 |
|
$ |
7,312 |
|
Weighted average number of common shares used for computation per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Basic |
|
35,009,554 |
|
33,310,413 |
|
34,987,332 |
|
33,178,176 |
|
||||
Diluted |
|
35,059,608 |
|
33,368,359 |
|
35,032,944 |
|
33,230,817 |
|
(1) See Funds from Operations above for a reconciliation of net income to FFO.
(2) Amortization of deferred note financing costs includes the amortization of costs incurred and capitalized when our notes were issued in May 1997, October 1998, January 1999 and March 2003. These costs are being amortized over the lives of these notes. No costs associated with our credit facility agreements or annual fees paid to credit rating agencies have been included.
(3) In 2003 our straight-line rent was less than our actual cash rent collected by the amounts indicated. In 2002 our straight-line rent exceeded our actual cash rent collected by the amounts indicated.
26
FFO GENERATED BY CREST NET LEASE
Crest Net generated $157,000 in FFO for Realty Income during the second quarter of 2003 compared to $901,000 during the second quarter of 2002. For six months ended June 30, 2003, Crest Net contributed $242,000 of FFO to Realty Income compared to $1.3 million for same period in 2002. The following is a calculation of the FFO generated by Crest Net (dollars in thousands):
|
|
Three |
|
Three |
|
Six |
|
Six |
|
||||
Gains from the sales of real estate acquired for resale |
|
$ |
296 |
|
$ |
1,126 |
|
$ |
572 |
|
$ |
1,491 |
|
Rent and other revenue |
|
134 |
|
481 |
|
229 |
|
956 |
|
||||
Interest expense |
|
(72 |
) |
(144 |
) |
(149 |
) |
(219 |
) |
||||
General and administrative expenses |
|
(71 |
) |
(88 |
) |
(243 |
) |
(284 |
) |
||||
Property expenses |
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
(42 |
) |
||||
Income taxes |
|
(120 |
) |
(474 |
) |
(151 |
) |
(638 |
) |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Total FFO generated by Crest Net |
|
$ |
157 |
|
$ |
901 |
|
$ |
242 |
|
$ |
1,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FFO per common share, basic and diluted |
|
$ |
0.004 |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
PROPERTY PORTFOLIO INFORMATION
As of June 30, 2003, we owned a diversified portfolio:
Of 1,250 properties;
With an occupancy rate of 98.7%, or 1,234 properties occupied of the 1,250 properties in the portfolio;
Leased to 81 different retail chains;
Doing business in 26 separate retail industries;
Located in 48 states;
With approximately 10.2 million square feet of leasable space; and
With an average leasable retail space of 8,100 square feet.
In addition to our real estate portfolio, at June 30, 2003, Crest Net had invested $4.7 million in three retail properties. These properties are held for sale.
At June 30, 2003, 1,230, or 98.4%, of our 1,250 retail properties were owned under net-lease agreements. Net leases typically require the tenant to be responsible for minimum monthly rent and property operating expenses including property taxes, insurance and maintenance. In addition, tenants are typically responsible for future rent increases (generally subject to ceilings) based on increases in the consumer price index, fixed increases or additional rent calculated as a percentage of the tenants gross sales above a specified level.
Our net-leased retail properties primarily are leased to regional and national retail chain store operators. Most buildings are single-story structures with adequate parking on site to accommodate peak retail traffic periods. The properties tend to be on major thoroughfares with relatively high traffic counts and adequate access, egress and proximity to a sufficient population base to constitute a suitable market or trade area for the retailers business.
27
The following table sets forth certain information regarding our properties classified according to the business of the respective tenants, expressed as a percentage of our total rental revenue:
|
|
Percentage of Rental Revenue (1) |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2003 |
|
|
|
||||||||||
26 Industries |
|
|
2002 |
|
2001 |
|
2000 |
|
1999 |
|
1998 |
|
1997 |
|
|
Apparel stores |
|
2.1% |
|
2.3% |
|
2.4% |
|
2.4% |
|
3.8% |
|
4.1% |
|
0.7% |
|
Automotive collision services |
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automotive parts |
|
7.0 |
|
7.6 |
|
8.3 |
|
8.3 |
|
8.6 |
|
7.8 |
|
9.1 |
|
Automotive service |
|
8.3 |
|
7.0 |
|
5.7 |
|
5.8 |
|
6.6 |
|
7.5 |
|
6.4 |
|
Book stores |
|
0.4 |
|
0.4 |
|
0.4 |
|
0.5 |
|
0.5 |
|
0.6 |
|
0.5 |
|
Business services |
|
0.1 |
|
0.1 |
|
0.1 |
|
0.1 |
|
0.1 |
|
* |
|
|
|
Child care |
|
18.8 |
|
20.8 |
|
23.9 |
|
24.7 |
|
25.3 |
|
29.2 |
|
35.9 |
|
Consumer electronics |
|
3.2 |
|
3.3 |
|
4.0 |
|
4.9 |
|
4.4 |
|
5.4 |
|
6.5 |
|
Convenience stores |
|
12.6 |
|
9.1 |
|
8.4 |
|
8.4 |
|
7.2 |
|
6.1 |
|
5.5 |
|
Crafts and novelties |
|
0.5 |
|
0.4 |
|
0.4 |
|
0.4 |
|
0.4 |
|
* |
|
|
|
Drug stores |
|
0.2 |
|
0.2 |
|
0.2 |
|
0.2 |
|
0.2 |
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
Entertainment |
|
2.7 |
|
2.3 |
|
1.8 |
|
2.0 |
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
General merchandise |
|
0.5 |
|
0.5 |
|
0.6 |
|
0.6 |
|
0.6 |
|
* |
|
|
|
Grocery stores |
|
0.3 |
|
0.5 |
|
0.6 |
|
0.6 |
|
0.5 |
|
* |
|
|
|
Health and fitness |
|
3.7 |
|
3.8 |
|
3.6 |
|
2.4 |
|
0.6 |
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
Home furnishings |
|
4.9 |
|
5.4 |
|
6.0 |
|
5.8 |
|
6.5 |
|
7.8 |
|
5.6 |
|
Home improvement |
|
1.1 |
|
1.2 |
|
1.3 |
|
2.0 |
|
3.6 |
|
* |
|
|
|
Office supplies |
|
2.0 |
|
2.1 |
|
2.2 |
|
2.3 |
|
2.6 |
|
3.0 |
|
1.7 |
|
Pet supplies and services |
|
1.6 |
|
1.7 |
|
1.6 |
|
1.5 |
|
1.1 |
|
0.6 |
|
0.2 |
|
Private education |
|
1.3 |
|
1.3 |
|
1.5 |
|
1.4 |
|
1.2 |
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
Restaurants |
|
12.2 |
|
13.5 |
|
12.2 |
|
12.3 |
|
13.3 |
|
16.2 |
|
19.8 |
|
Shoe stores |
|
1.0 |
|
0.8 |
|
0.7 |
|
0.8 |
|
1.1 |
|
0.8 |
|
0.2 |
|
Sporting goods |
|
3.9 |
|
4.1 |
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Theaters |
|
4.1 |
|
3.9 |
|
4.3 |
|
2.7 |
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Travel plazas |
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Video rental |
|
3.3 |
|
3.3 |
|
3.7 |
|
3.9 |
|
4.3 |
|
3.8 |
|
0.6 |
|
Other |
|
3.7 |
|
4.4 |
|
5.2 |
|
6.0 |
|
5.7 |
|
6.0 |
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
100.0% |
|
100.0% |
|
100.0% |
|
100.0% |
|
100.0% |
|
100.0% |
|
100.0% |
|
* Less than 0.1%
(1) Includes rental revenue for all properties owned by Realty Income at the end of each period presented (including revenue from properties reclassified to discontinued operations) and excludes properties owned by our subsidiary, Crest Net.
28
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the properties owned by Realty Income at June 30, 2003, classified according to the retail business types and the level of services they provide (dollars in thousands):
Industry |
|
Number of |
|
Rental
Revenue |
|
Percentage
of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tenants Providing Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automotive collision services |
|
4 |
|
$ |
52 |
|
0.1 |
% |
Automotive service |
|
189 |
|
3,000 |
|
8.3 |
|
|
Child care |
|
308 |
|
6,814 |
|
18.8 |
|
|
Entertainment |
|
10 |
|
965 |
|
2.7 |
|
|
Health and fitness |
|
10 |
|
1,356 |
|
3.7 |
|
|
Private education |
|
5 |
|
462 |
|
1.3 |
|
|
Theaters |
|
11 |
|
1,502 |
|
4.1 |
|
|
Other |
|
8 |
|
1,351 |
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
|
545 |
|
15,502 |
|
42.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tenants Selling Goods and Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automotive parts (with installation) |
|
35 |
|
933 |
|
2.6 |
|
|
Business services |
|
1 |
|
32 |
|
0.1 |
|
|
Convenience stores |
|
170 |
|
4,579 |
|
12.6 |
|
|
Home improvement |
|
2 |
|
47 |
|
0.1 |
|
|
Pet supplies and services |
|
6 |
|
397 |
|
1.1 |
|
|
Restaurants |
|
212 |
|
4,408 |
|
12.2 |
|
|
Travel plazas |
|
1 |
|
134 |
|
0.4 |
|
|
Video rental |
|
34 |
|
1,195 |
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
|
461 |
|
11,725 |
|
32.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tenants Selling Goods |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apparel stores |
|
5 |
|
775 |
|
2.1 |
|
|
Automotive parts |
|
103 |
|
1,591 |
|
4.4 |
|
|
Book stores |
|
2 |
|
152 |
|
0.4 |
|
|
Consumer electronics |
|
36 |
|
1,146 |
|
3.2 |
|
|
Crafts and novelties |
|
3 |
|
188 |
|
0.5 |
|
|
Drug stores |
|
1 |
|
61 |
|
0.2 |
|
|
General merchandise |
|
11 |
|
172 |
|
0.5 |
|
|
Grocery stores |
|
2 |
|
100 |
|
0.3 |
|
|
Home furnishings |
|
38 |
|
1,762 |
|
4.9 |
|
|
Home improvement |
|
13 |
|
346 |
|
1.0 |
|
|
Office supplies |
|
9 |
|
716 |
|
2.0 |
|
|
Pet supplies |
|
4 |
|
188 |
|
0.5 |
|
|
Shoe stores |
|
5 |
|
349 |
|
1.0 |
|
|
Sporting goods |
|
12 |
|
1,403 |
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
|
244 |
|
8,949 |
|
24.9 |
|
|
TOTALS |
|
1,250 |
|
$ |
36,176 |
|
100.0 |
% |
(1) Excludes properties owned by our subsidiary, Crest Net.
(2) Includes rental revenue for all properties owned by Realty Income at June 30, 2003 (including revenue from properties reclassified to discontinued operations of $131) and excludes revenue of $134 from properties owned by Crest Net.
29
Of the 1,250 properties in the portfolio at June 30, 2003, 1,245 were single-tenant properties with the remaining properties being multi-tenant properties. At June 30, 2003, 1,230 of the 1,245 single-tenant properties, or 98.8%, were net leased with a weighted average remaining lease term (excluding extension options) of approximately 11.0 years.
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the timing of the initial lease term expirations (excluding extension options) on our 1,230 net-leased, single-tenant retail properties at June 30, 2003 (dollars in thousands):
Years |
|
Number of |
|
Rental
Revenue |
|
Percentage
of |
|
|
2003 |
|
71 |
|
$ |
1,404 |
|
4.0% |
|
2004 |
|
123 |
|
|
2,538 |
|
7.3 |
|
2005 |
|
75 |
|
|
1,378 |
|
4.0 |
|
2006 |
|
88 |
|
|
1,956 |
|
5.6 |
|
2007 |
|
120 |
|
|
2,122 |
|
6.1 |
|
2008 |
|
75 |
|
|
1,609 |
|
4.6 |
|
2009 |
|
30 |
|
|
709 |
|
2.0 |
|
2010 |
|
42 |
|
|
921 |
|
2.7 |
|
2011 |
|
35 |
|
|
1,303 |
|
3.7 |
|
2012 |
|
49 |
|
|
1,521 |
|
4.4 |
|
2013 |
|
72 |
|
|
3,201 |
|
9.2 |
|
2014 |
|
36 |
|
|
1,638 |
|
4.7 |
|
2015 |
|
32 |
|
|
836 |
|
2.4 |
|
2016 |
|
14 |
|
|
378 |
|
1.1 |
|
2017 |
|
21 |
|
|
1,297 |
|
3.7 |
|
2018 |
|
17 |
|
|
517 |
|
1.5 |
|
2019 |
|
50 |
|
|
2,271 |
|
6.5 |
|
2020 |
|
10 |
|
|
916 |
|
2.6 |
|
2021 |
|
95 |
|
|
3,617 |
|
10.4 |
|
2022 |
|
96 |
|
|
2,427 |
|
7.0 |
|
2023 |
|
67 |
|
|
1,170 |
|
3.4 |
|
2024 |
|
2 |
|
|
97 |
|
0.3 |
|
2026 |
|
2 |
|
|
93 |
|
0.3 |
|
2033 |
|
3 |
|
|
324 |
|
0.9 |
|
2034 |
|
2 |
|
|
208 |
|
0.6 |
|
2037 |
|
3 |
|
|
338 |
|
1.0 |
|
Totals |
|
1,230 |
|
$ |
34,789 |
|
100.0% |
|
(1) Excludes properties owned by our subsidiary, Crest Net. The lease expirations for properties under construction are based on the estimated date of completion of those properties.
(2) Includes rental revenue of $131 from properties reclassified to discontinued operations and excludes revenue of $1,323 from four multi-tenant properties, revenue of $64 from 16 single-tenant properties vacant and unleased at June 30, 2003 and revenue of $134 from properties owned by our subsidiary, Crest Net.
30
The following table sets forth certain state-by-state information regarding Realty Incomes property portfolio as of June 30, 2003 (dollars in thousands):
State |
|
Number of |
|
Percent |
|
Approximate |
|
Rental
Revenue |
|
Percentage
of |
|
||
Alabama |
|
14 |
|
100% |
|
137,600 |
|
$ |
346 |
|
1.0% |
|
|
Alaska |
|
2 |
|
100 |
|
128,500 |
|
|
251 |
|
0.7 |
|
|
Arizona |
|
35 |
|
94 |
|
240,700 |
|
|
961 |
|
2.7 |
|
|
Arkansas |
|
8 |
|
100 |
|
48,800 |
|
|
241 |
|
0.7 |
|
|
California |
|
60 |
|
100 |
|
989,900 |
|
|
3,537 |
|
9.8 |
|
|
Colorado |
|
44 |
|
98 |
|
275,100 |
|
|
1,043 |
|
2.9 |
|
|
Connecticut |
|
16 |
|
100 |
|
245,600 |
|
|
924 |
|
2.5 |
|
|
Delaware |
|
16 |
|
100 |
|
29,100 |
|
|
339 |
|
0.9 |
|
|
Florida |
|
89 |
|
100 |
|
1,247,700 |
|
|
3,695 |
|
10.2 |
|
|
Georgia |
|
70 |
|
100 |
|
539,900 |
|
|
1,696 |
|
4.7 |
|
|
Idaho |
|
11 |
|
100 |
|
52,000 |
|
|
187 |
|
0.5 |
|
|
Illinois |
|
38 |
|
100 |
|
301,200 |
|
|
1,071 |
|
3.0 |
|
|
Indiana |
|
27 |
|
100 |
|
150,100 |
|
|
526 |
|
1.4 |
|
|
Iowa |
|
10 |
|
100 |
|
67,600 |
|
|
174 |
|
0.5 |
|
|
Kansas |
|
21 |
|
100 |
|
190,000 |
|
|
556 |
|
1.5 |
|
|
Kentucky |
|
13 |
|
100 |
|
43,600 |
|
|
276 |
|
0.8 |
|
|
Louisiana |
|
7 |
|
100 |
|
47,100 |
|
|
181 |
|
0.5 |
|
|
Maryland |
|
19 |
|
100 |
|
156,600 |
|
|
865 |
|
2.4 |
|
|
Massachusetts |
|
30 |
|
100 |
|
138,300 |
|
|
727 |
|
2.0 |
|
|
Michigan |
|
13 |
|
100 |
|
81,600 |
|
|
291 |
|
0.8 |
|
|
Minnesota |
|
20 |
|
90 |
|
224,700 |
|
|
511 |
|
1.4 |
|
|
Mississippi |
|
21 |
|
100 |
|
174,000 |
|
|
426 |
|
1.2 |
|
|
Missouri |
|
34 |
|
100 |
|
225,200 |
|
|
744 |
|
2.1 |
|
|
Montana |
|
2 |
|
100 |
|
30,000 |
|
|
74 |
|
0.2 |
|
|
Nebraska |
|
10 |
|
100 |
|
91,200 |
|
|
295 |
|
0.8 |
|
|
Nevada |
|
10 |
|
100 |
|
100,700 |
|
|
406 |
|
1.1 |
|
|
New Hampshire |
|
6 |
|
100 |
|
23,900 |
|
|
149 |
|
0.4 |
|
|
New Jersey |
|
23 |
|
100 |
|
110,800 |
|
|
978 |
|
2.7 |
|
|
New Mexico |
|
5 |
|
100 |
|
46,000 |
|
|
87 |
|
0.2 |
|
|
New York |
|
24 |
|
100 |
|
265,600 |
|
|
1,395 |
|
3.8 |
|
|
North Carolina |
|
39 |
|
97 |
|
207,200 |
|
|
1,005 |
|
2.8 |
|
|
North Dakota |
|
1 |
|
100 |
|
22,000 |
|
|
16 |
|
* |
|
|
Ohio |
|
73 |
|
99 |
|
467,900 |
|
|
1,604 |
|
4.4 |
|
|
Oklahoma |
|
17 |
|
100 |
|
94,300 |
|
|
347 |
|
1.0 |
|
|
Oregon |
|
18 |
|
100 |
|
206,000 |
|
|
488 |
|
1.3 |
|
|
Pennsylvania |
|
50 |
|
100 |
|
291,000 |
|
|
1,177 |
|
3.2 |
|
|
Rhode Island |
|
1 |
|
100 |
|
3,500 |
|
|
29 |
|
0.1 |
|
|
South Carolina |
|
46 |
|
96 |
|
136,900 |
|
|
932 |
|
2.6 |
|
|
South Dakota |
|
1 |
|
100 |
|
6,500 |
|
|
25 |
|
0.1 |
|
|
Tennessee |
|
35 |
|
100 |
|
253,100 |
|
|
892 |
|
2.5 |
|
|
Texas |
|
151 |
|
98 |
|
1,195,900 |
|
|
3,476 |
|
9.6 |
|
|
Utah |
|
7 |
|
86 |
|
43,300 |
|
|
104 |
|
0.3 |
|
|
Vermont |
|
1 |
|
100 |
|
2,500 |
|
|
22 |
|
0.1 |
|
|
Virginia |
|
51 |
|
100 |
|
369,600 |
|
|
1,869 |
|
5.2 |
|
|
Washington |
|
39 |
|
97 |
|
256,900 |
|
|
740 |
|
2.0 |
|
|
West Virginia |
|
2 |
|
100 |
|
16,800 |
|
|
40 |
|
0.1 |
|
|
Wisconsin |
|
16 |
|
88 |
|
162,300 |
|
|
384 |
|
1.1 |
|
|
Wyoming |
|
4 |
|
100 |
|
20,100 |
|
|
74 |
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Totals/Average |
|
1,250 |
|
99% |
|
10,158,900 |
|
$ |
36,176 |
|
100.0% |
|
|
* Less than 0.1%
(1) Excludes properties owned by our subsidiary, Crest Net.
(2) Includes rental revenue for all properties owned by Realty Income at June 30, 2003 (including revenue from properties reclassified to discontinued operations of $131) and excludes revenue of $134 from properties owned by Crest Net.
31
IMPACT OF INFLATION
Tenant leases generally provide for limited increases in rent as a result of increases in the tenants sales volumes, increases in the consumer price index, and/or fixed increases. We expect that inflation will cause these lease provisions to result in increases in rent over time. During times when inflation is greater than increases in rent as provided for in the leases, rent increases may not keep up with the rate of inflation.
Approximately 98.4%, or 1,230, of the 1,250 properties in the portfolio are leased to tenants under net leases where the tenant is responsible for property costs and expenses. Net leases tend to reduce our exposure to rising property expenses due to inflation. Inflation and increased costs may have an adverse impact on our tenants if increases in their operating expenses exceed increases in revenue.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
We are exposed to interest rate changes primarily as a result of our credit facility and long-term notes used to maintain liquidity and expand our real estate investment portfolio and operations. Our interest rate risk management objective is to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flow and to lower our overall borrowing costs. To achieve these objectives we issue long-term notes, primarily at fixed rates and may selectively enter into derivative financial instruments such as interest rate lock agreements, interest rate swaps and caps in order to mitigate our interest rate risk on a related financial instrument. We are not a party to any derivative financial instruments as of June 30, 2003. We do not enter into any transactions for speculative or trading purposes.
Our interest rate risk is monitored using a variety of techniques. The table below presents the principal amounts, weighted average interest rates, fair values and other terms required by year of expected maturity to evaluate the expected cash flows and sensitivity to interest rate changes (dollars in table in millions):
|
|
Expected Maturity Data |
|
Total |
|
Fair Value(5) |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
$ |
110.0 |
(2) |
$ |
100.0 |
(3) |
$ |
120.0 |
(4) |
$ |
330.0 |
|
$ |
350.9 |
|
||
Average interest rate |
|
|
|
7.75 |
% |
8.25 |
% |
5.81 |
% |
7.20 |
% |
|
|
||||||
Variable rate debt |
|
$ |
52.1 |
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
52.1 |
|
$ |
52.1 |
|
|||
Average interest rate |
|
1.97 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.97 |
% |
|
|
||||||
(1) The credit facility expires in October 2005.
(2) $110 million matures in May 2007.
(3) $100 million matures in October 2008.
(4) $20 million matures in January 2009 and $100 million matures in March 2013.
(5) We base the fair value of the fixed rate debt at June 30, 2003 on the closing market price or indicative price per each note. The fair value of the variable rate debt approximates its carrying value because its terms are similar to those available in the market place at June 30, 2003.
The table incorporates only those exposures that exist as of June 30, 2003. It does not consider those exposures or positions that could arise after that date. As a result, our ultimate realized gain or loss, with respect to interest rate fluctuations, would depend on the exposures that arise during the period, our hedging strategies at the time, and interest rates.
32
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedure. We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Securities Exchange Act 1934 Rules 13a-14(c) and 15d-14(c)) that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.
Within 90 days prior to the date of this quarterly report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on the foregoing, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
Changes in Internal Controls. There have not been any significant changes in our internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation. There were no significant deficiencies or material weaknesses, and therefore no corrective actions were taken.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
Our annual meeting of stockholders was held on May 6, 2003. Two proposals were considered. The first was to elect three directors to hold office for three years or until their successors are elected and qualified. Proxies for the meeting were solicited pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
All of managements nominees for directors as listed in the proxy statement were elected with the following vote:
|
|
Year Term Expires |
|
Shares |
|
Authority to Vote Withheld |
|
William E. Clark, Jr. |
|
2006 |
|
28,088,036 |
|
2,033,231 |
|
Thomas A. Lewis |
|
2006 |
|
29,527,804 |
|
593,463 |
|
Kathleen R. Allen |
|
2006 |
|
29,420,211 |
|
701,056 |
|
The following directors were not elected at the meeting but have terms continuing after the meeting, as set forth below:
|
|
Year Term Expires |
|
Roger P. Kuppinger |
|
2004 |
|
Michael D. McKee |
|
2004 |
|
Donald R. Cameron |
|
2005 |
|
Willard H. Smith, Jr. |
|
2005 |
|
33
The second proposal was to approve the 2003 Incentive Award Plan of Realty Income Corporation. The 2003 Incentive Award Plan of Realty Income Corporation was approved pursuant to the following vote:
Shares Voted For: |
|
27,046,504 |
Shares Voted Against: |
|
2,127,579 |
Shares Abstained: |
|
947,697 |
Item 6. Exhibits And Reports On Form 8-K
A. Exhibits:
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
3.1 |
|
Articles of Incorporation of the Company (filed as Appendix B to the Companys Proxy Statement dated March 28, 1997 (1997 Proxy Statement) and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
Bylaws of the Company (filed as Appendix C to the Companys 1997 Proxy Statement and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
Articles Supplementary of the Class A Junior Participating Preferred Stock of Realty Income Corporation (filed as exhibit A of exhibit 1 to Realty Incomes registration statement on Form 8-A, dated June 26, 1998, and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
Articles Supplementary to the Articles of Incorporation of Realty Income Corporation classifying and designating the Class B Preferred Stock (filed as exhibit 4.1 to the Companys Form 8-K dated May 24, 1999 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
Articles Supplementary to the Articles of Incorporation of Realty Income Corporation classifying and designating the Class C Preferred Stock (filed as exhibit 4.1 to the Companys Form 8-K dated July 29, 1999 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
Amendment to the Bylaws of the Company (filed herein). |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
Pricing Committee Resolutions and Form of 7.75% Notes due 2007 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Companys Form 8-K dated May 5, 1997 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
Indenture dated as of May 6, 1997 between the Company and The Bank of New York (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Companys Form 8-K dated May 5, 1997 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
First Supplemental Indenture dated as of May 28, 1997, between the Company and The Bank of New York (filed as Exhibit 4.3 to the Companys Form 8-B and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
Rights Agreement, dated as of June 25, 1998, between Realty Income Corporation and The Bank of New York (filed as an exhibit 1 to the Companys registration statement on Form 8-A, dated June 26, 1998, and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
Pricing Committee Resolutions (filed as an exhibit 4.2 to the Companys Form 8-K, dated October 27, 1998 and incorporated herein by reference). |
34
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
.6 |
|
Form of 8.25% Notes due 2008 (filed as exhibit 4.3 to the Companys Form 8-K, dated October 27, 1998 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
4 |
.7 |
|
Indenture dated as of October 28, 1998 between Realty Income and The Bank of New York (filed as exhibit 4.1 to Realty Incomes Form 8-K, dated October 27, 1998 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
4 |
.8 |
|
Pricing Committee Resolutions and Form of 8% Notes due 2009 (filed as exhibit 4.2 to Realty Incomes Form 8-K, dated January 21, 1999 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
4 |
.9 |
|
Form of 5-3/8% Senior Notes due 2013 (filed as exhibit 4.2 to Realty Incomes Form 8-K, dated March 5, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
4 |
.10 |
|
Officers Certificate pursuant to sections 201, 301 and 303 of the Indenture dated October 28, 1998 between the Company and The Bank of New York, as Trustee, establishing a series of securities entitled 5-3/8% Senior Notes due 2013 (filed as exhibit 4.3 to Realty Incomes Form 8-K, dated March 5, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
10 |
.1 |
|
First amendment dated July 16, 2003 to the $250 million Credit Agreement dated October 28, 2002 (filed herein). |
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
Section 302 Certifications as filed by the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to SEC release No. 33-8212 and 34-47551. |
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
Section 906 Certifications as furnished by the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to SEC release No. 33-8212 and 34-47551. |
B. One report on Form 8-K was filed by the registrant during the quarter for which this report is filed.
We filed a Form 8-K dated May 1, 2003 announcing that we issued a press release, which sets forth our results of operations for the quarter ended March 31, 2003.
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
REALTY INCOME CORPORATION |
|
|
|
/s/ GREGORY J. FAHEY |
Date: August 6, 2003 |
Gregory J. Fahey |
|
Vice President, Controller |
|
(Principal Accounting Officer) |
35