FORM 10-Q

 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

ý  Quarterly Report Under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2003

or

o  Transition Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the Transition Period from                                to

Commission File Number: 0-27384

 

 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:    (209) 725-2200

 

Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report:  Not applicable

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes   ý  No   o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes   o  No   ý

 

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock, no par value, as of March 31, 2003 was 5,329,038.  No shares of preferred stock, no par value, were outstanding at March 31, 2003.

 

 

Capital Corp of the West

Table of Contents

 

PART I. — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.  Financial Statements
	Consolidated Balance Sheets (unaudited)
	Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income (unaudited)
	Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders Equity (unaudited)
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited)
	Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
Item 2.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Item 3.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Item 4.  Controls and Procedures
PART II. — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.  Legal Proceedings
Item 2.  Changes in Securities
Item 3.  Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Item 4.  Submission of matters to a vote of Security Holders
Item 5.  Other Information
Item 6.  Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
SIGNATURES
Certifications under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Exhibit Index

 

2

 

Capital Corp of the West

Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Unaudited)

 

		March 31, 2003			December 31, 2002
		(Dollars in thousands)
Assets
Cash and noninterest-bearing deposits in other banks		$	33,197		$	46,628
Federal funds sold		—			26,555
Time deposits at other financial institutions		600			500
Investment securities available for sale, at fair value		255,858			231,392
Investment securities held to maturity at cost, fair value of $61,641 and $57,905 at March 31, 2003 and December 31, 2002		59,775			55,628
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses of $12,690 and $12,134 at March 31, 2003 and December 31, 2002		642,638			621,639
Interest receivable		5,517			5,532
Premises and equipment, net		15,278			13,942
Intangible assets		3,155			3,325
Other assets		33,660			29,069
Total assets		$	1,049,678		$	1,034,210
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
Deposits
Noninterest-bearing demand		$	151,409		$	164,852
Negotiable orders of withdrawal		117,574			120,449
Savings		226,049			223,404
Time, under $100,000		158,923			164,959
Time, $100,000 and over		152,816			160,715
Total deposits		806,771			834,379
Borrowed funds		151,009			110,204
Accrued interest, taxes and other liabilities		5,986			6,427
Total liabilities		963,766			951,010
Capital Securities and minority interests		6,031			6,031
Preferred Stock, no par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; None outstanding		—			—
Common stock, no par value; 20,000,000 shares authorized; 5,329,038 and 5,325,082 issued & outstanding at March 31, 2003 and December 31, 2002		46,476			46,436
Retained earnings		30,851			27,824
Accumulated other comprehensive income		2,554			2,909
Total shareholders’ equity		79,881			77,169
Total liabilities, Capital Securities and minority interests and shareholders’ equity		$	1,049,678		$	1,034,210

 

See accompanying notes

 

3

 

Capital Corp of the West
Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income
(Unaudited)

 

		For the three months ended March 31,
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)		2003			2002
Interest income:
Interest and fees on loans		$	11,333		$	10,137
Interest on deposits with other financial institutions		2			2
Interest on investments held to maturity:
Taxable		766			927
Non-taxable		55			55
Interest on investments available for sale:
Taxable		2,176			2,472
Non-taxable		272			272
Interest on federal funds sold		39			12
Total interest income		14,643			13,877
Interest expense:
Interest on negotiable orders of withdrawal		14			54
Interest on savings deposits		580			831
Interest on time deposits, under $100		1,120			1,539
Interest on time deposits, $100 and over		989			1,179
Interest on other borrowings		1,151			948
Total interest expense		3,854			4,551
Net interest income		10,789			9,326
Provision for loan losses		671			780
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		10,118			8,546
Noninterest income:
Service charges on deposit accounts		1,277			1,127
Other		1,049			652
Total noninterest income		2,326			1,779
Noninterest expenses:
Salaries and related benefits		4,503			3,944
Premises and occupancy		670			569
Equipment		759			716
Professional fees		274			253
Marketing		260			188
Intangible asset amortization		170			170
Supplies		235			186
Dividend Expense on Capital Securities		153			154
Other		1,489			1,245
Total noninterest expenses		8,513			7,425
Income before income taxes		3,931			2,900
Provision for income taxes		904			676
Net income		$	3,027		$	2,224
Comprehensive Income:
Unrealized loss on securities arising during the period		(355		)	(1,386		)
Comprehensive Income		$	2,672		$	838
Basic earnings per share		$	0.54		$	0.41
Diluted earnings per share		$	0.52		$	0.40

 

See accompanying notes

 

4

 

Capital Corp of the West

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity

(Unaudited)

 

 

(Amounts in thousands)							Retained earnings			Accumulated other comprehensive income			Total
		Common Stock
		Number of shares		Amounts
Balance, December 31, 2002		5,325		$	46,436		$	27,824		$	2,909		$	77,169
Exercise of stock options		4		40			—			—			40
Net Change in fair market value of investment securities and swaps, net of tax benefit of $232		—		—			—			(355		)	(355		)
Net income		—		—			3,027			—			3,027
Balance, March 31, 2003		5,329		$	46,476		$	30,851		$	2,554		$	79,881

 

See accompanying notes

 

5

 

Capital Corp of the West
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)

 

(Dollars in thousands)		3 months ended March 31, 2003			3 months ended March 31, 2002
Operating activities:
Net income		$	3,027		$	2,224
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in)
Operating activities:
Provision for loan losses		671			780
Depreciation, amortization and accretion, net		1,276			846
Net increase in interest receivable & other assets		(4,187		)	(1,527		)
Net increase (decrease) in deferred loan fees		129			114
Net decrease in accrued interest payable & other liabilities		(441		)	(5,343		)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		475			(2,906		)
Investing activities:
Investment securities purchases		(51,616		)	(45,653		)
Proceeds from maturities of investment securities		21,916			16,499
Net increase in time deposits in other financial institutions		(100		)	—
Proceeds from sales of loans		1,991			1,200
Net increase in loans		(24,150		)	(16,936		)
Purchases of premises and equipment		(1,739		)	(282		)
Net cash used in investing activities		(53,698		)	(45,172		)
Financing activities:
Net (decrease) increase in demand, NOW and savings deposits		(13,673		)	6,377
Net decrease in certificates of deposit		(13,935		)	(7,475		)
Net proceeds from other borrowings		40,805			35,951
Issuance of Capital Securities and increase in minority interests		—			31
Issuance of shares pursuant to 401K and ESOP plans		—			313
Exercise of stock options		40			139
Net cash provided by financing activities		13,237			35,336
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(39,986		)	(12,742		)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		73,183			49,288
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period		$	33,197		$	36,546
Cash paid during the quarter:
Interest paid		$	3,488		$	4,623
Supplemental disclosure of noncash investing and financing activities:
Investment securities unrealized losses and swaps, net of tax		(355		)	(1,386		)

 

See accompanying notes

 

6

 

Capital Corp of the West
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2003 and December 31, 2002
(Unaudited)

GENERAL - COMPANY

 

Capital Corp of the West (the “Company” or “Capital Corp”) is a bank holding company incorporated under the laws of the State of California on April 26, 1995.  On November 1, 1995, the Company became registered as a bank holding company, and is a holder of all of the capital stock of County Bank (the “Bank”).  During 1998, the Company formed Capital West Group, a subsidiary that engages in the financial institution advisory business but is currently inactive.  The Company’s primary asset is the Bank and the Bank is the Company’s primary source of income.  The Company’s securities consist of 20,000,000 shares of Common Stock, no par value, 10,000,000 shares of Authorized Preferred Stock, and 6,000,000 of Trust Preferred 10.20% Capital Securities which have a liquidation amount of $1,000 per capital security.  As of March 31, 2003 there were 5,329,038 common shares outstanding, held of record by approximately 1,700 shareholders.  There were no preferred shares outstanding at March 31, 2003.  The Bank has three wholly owned subsidiaries, Merced Area Investment & Development, Inc. (“MAID”), County Asset Advisors (“CAA”), and County Investment Trust (“REIT”).  CAA is currently inactive.  On April 26, 2002, the Company entered into an agreement to purchase Regency Investment Advisors, Inc (“RIA”).  The purchase of RIA was completed during the second quarter, 2002.  The Company has two other wholly owned subsidiaries, County Statutory Trust (“Trust”), and Capital West Group, Inc.  The Trust is used in connection with the Capital Securities that have been issued by the Company.  Capital West Group, Inc. is currently inactive.  All references herein to the “Company” include the Company, the Company’s subsidiaries, the Bank and the Bank’s subsidiaries, unless the context otherwise requires.

 

GENERAL - BANK

 

The Bank was organized on August 1, 1977, as County Bank of Merced, a California state banking corporation.  The Bank commenced operations on December 22, 1977.  In November 1992, the Bank changed its legal name to County Bank.  The Bank’s securities consist of one class of Common Stock, no par value and is wholly owned by the Company.  The Bank’s deposits are insured under the Federal Deposit Insurance Act by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) up to applicable limits stated therein.  Like most state-chartered banks of its size in California, it is not a member of the Federal Reserve System.

 

INDUSTRY AND MARKET AREA

 

The Bank engages in general commercial banking business primarily in Fresno, Madera, Mariposa, Merced, San Francisco, San Joaquin, Stanislaus and Tuolomne counties.  The Bank has eighteen full service branch offices; two of which are located in Merced with the branch located in downtown Merced currently serving as both a branch and as administrative headquarters. There are offices in Atwater, Dos Palos, Hilmar, Livingston, Los Banos, Madera, Mariposa, San Francisco, Sonora, Stockton, two offices in Modesto, two in Fresno and two offices in Turlock.  The Bank’s administrative headquarters also provides accommodations for the activities of Merced Area Investment & Development (“MAID”), the Bank’s wholly owned real estate subsidiary.

 

7

 

OTHER FINANCIAL NOTES

 

All adjustments which in the opinion of Management are necessary for a fair presentation of the Company’s financial position at March 31, 2003 and December 2002 and the results of operations for the three month periods ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, and the statements of cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2003 and 2002 have been included.  Earnings per share have been adjusted to reflect the affect of the 5% stock dividend that was paid April 25, 2003 to shareholders of record on April 1, 2003.  The interim results for the three months ended March 31, 2003 and 2002 are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year.  These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes included in the Company’s Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2002.

 

The accompanying unaudited financial statements have been prepared on a basis consistent with generally accepted accounting principles and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X.

 

Basic earnings per share (EPS) is computed by dividing net income available to shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period.  Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period plus potential common shares outstanding.  Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in the earnings of the Company.

 

The following table provides a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator of the basic and diluted earnings per share computation of the three month periods ended March 31, 2003 and 2002:

 

		For The Three Months Ended March 31,
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)		2003			2002
Basic EPS computation:
Net income		$	3,027		$	2,224
Average common shares outstanding		5,326			5,195
5% Stock Dividend in April, 2003		266			247
Average common shares outstanding		5,592			5,455
Basic EPS		$	0.54		$	0.41
Diluted EPS Computations:
Net income		$	3,027		$	2,224
Average common shares outstanding		5,326			5,195
5% Stock Dividend in April, 2002		266			247
Effect of stock options		184			160
		5,776			5,602
Diluted EPS		$	0.52		$	0.40

 

The Company has intangible assets consisting of core deposit premiums and goodwill.  Core deposit premiums are amortized using an accelerated method over a period of ten years.  Intangible assets related to goodwill will no longer be amortized after December 31, 2001 but will be reviewed for potential

 

8

 

impairment.  Management has determined there was no impairment of goodwill as of March 31, 2003.  As of March 31, 2003 and December 31, 2002, the Company had unamortized core deposit premiums of $1,223,000 and $1,390,000, respectively.  Amortization of core deposit premiums and other intangibles was $170,000 during the first quarter of 2003 and 2002.  Core deposit premiums and other intangibles are scheduled to amortize at a rate of approximately $170,000 per quarter through the quarter ended September 30, 2004 and at a rate of $47,000 during the fourth quarter of 2004.  Core deposit premiums of $460,000 and $4,340,000 were initially recorded as a result of purchasing deposits from Town and Country Finance and Thrift in July, 1996 and from the purchase of three branches from Bank of America in December, 1997, respectively.

 

The Company provides stock-based compensation to certain officers and directors.  The Company uses the intrinsic value method to account for its stock option plans (in accordance with the provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25).  Under this method, compensation expense is recognized for awards of options to purchase shares of common stock to employees under compensatory plans only if the fair market value of the stock at the option grant date (or other measurement date, if later) is greater than the amount the employee must pay to acquire the stock.  Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (SFAS 123) permits companies to continue using the intrinsic value method or to adopt a fair value based model to account for stock option plans.  The fair value based method results in recognizing as expense over the vesting period the fair value of all stock-based awards on the date of grant.  The Company has elected to continue to use the intrinsic value method.

 

Had compensation cost for the Company’s option plans been determined in accordance with SFAS 123, the Company’s net income and earnings per share would have been reduced to the pro forma amounts indicated as follows:

 

		Three months ended March 31,
(dollars in thousands except per share amounts)		2003			2002
Net income:		$	3,027		$	2,224
As reported
Pro forma		$	2,851		$	2,105
Basic earnings per share:
As reported		$	0.54		$	0.41
Pro forma		$	0.51		$	0.39
Diluted earnings per share:
As reported		$	0.52		$	0.40
Pro forma		$	0.49		$	0.37
Stock-based employee compensation cost, net of related tax effects, included in net income:
As reported		$	—		$	—
Pro forma		$	176		$	119

 

9

 

Item 2.    Management’s Discussion And Analysis Of Financial Condition And Results Of Operations

 

The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contains forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties and include information about possible or assumed future results of operations.  Many possible events or factors could affect the future financial results and performance of the company.  This could cause results or performance to differ materially from those expressed in our forward-looking statements.  Words such as “experts”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “estimates”, variations of such words and other similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements.  These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions which are difficult to predict.  Therefore, actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed or forecasted in, or implied by, such forward-looking statements.

 

Readers of the Company’s Form 10-Q should not rely solely on forward looking statements and should consider all uncertainties and risks discussed throughout this report, as well as those discussed in the Company’s 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed March 27, 2003.  These statements are representative only on the date hereof, and the Company undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements made.  Some possible events or factors that could occur that may cause differences from expected results include the following: the Company’s loan growth is dependent on economic conditions, as well as various discretionary factors, such as decisions to sell, or purchase certain loans or loan portfolios; participations of loans and the management of borrower, industry, product and geographic concentrations and the mix of the loan portfolio.  The rate of charge-offs and provision expense can be affected by local, regional and international economic and market conditions, concentrations of borrowers, industries, products and geographical conditions, the mix of the loan portfolio and management’s judgements regarding the collectibility of loans.  Liquidity requirements may change as a result of fluctuations in assets and liabilities and off-balance sheet exposures, which will impact the capital and debt financing needs of the Company and the mix of funding sources.  Decisions to purchase, hold, or sell securities are also dependent on liquidity requirements and market volatility, as well as on and off-balance sheet positions.  Factors that may impact interest rate risk include local, regional and international economic conditions, levels, mix, maturities, yields or rates of assets and liabilities and the wholesale and retail funding sources of the Company.

 

The Company is also exposed to the potential of losses arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices which can adversely impact the value of financial products, including securities, loans, and deposits.  In addition, the banking industry in general is subject to various monetary and fiscal policies and regulations, which include those determined by the Federal Reserve Board, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and state regulators, whose policies and regulations could affect the Company’s results.

 

Other factors that may cause actual results to differ from the forward-looking statements include the following: competition with other local and regional banks, savings and loan associations, credit unions and other nonbank financial institutions, such as investment banking firms, investment advisory firms, brokerage firms, mutual funds and insurance companies, as well as other entities which offer financial services; interest rate, market and monetary fluctuations; inflation; market volatility; general economic conditions; introduction and acceptance of new banking-related products, services and enhancements; fee pricing strategies, mergers and acquisitions and their integration into the Company, civil disturbances or terrorist threats or acts, or apprehension about the possible future occurrences or acts of this type, outbreak or escalation of hostilities in which the United States is involved, any declaration of war by the

 

10

 

U.S. Congress or any other national or international calamity, crisis or emergency, and management’s ability to manage these and other risks.

 

Critical accounting policies and estimates

 

The company’s discussion and analysis of its financial condition and results of operations are based upon the Company’s consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.  The preparation of these financial statements requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities.  On an on-going basis, the Company evaluates its estimates, including those related to the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, intangible assets, and contingencies.  The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.  Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. (See caption “Allowance for Loan Losses” for a more detailed discussion).

 

11

 

 

The following discussion and analysis is designed to provide a better understanding of the significant changes and trends related to the Company and its subsidiaries’ financial condition, operating results, asset and liability management, liquidity and capital resources and should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company and the Notes thereto.

 

Results Of Operations

 

Three Months Ended March 31, 2003 Compared With Three Months Ended March 31, 2002

 

Overview.  For the three months ended March 31, 2003 the Company reported record net income of $3,027,000.  This compares to $2,224,000 for the same period in 2002 and represents an increase of $803,000 or 36%.  Basic and fully diluted earnings per share were $.54 and $.52 for the three months ended March 31, 2003. This compares to basic and fully diluted earnings per share of $.41 and $.40 for the three months ended March 31, 2002 and represents an increase of $0.13 and $0.12 per share for both basic and fully diluted earnings per share. The basic and fully diluted earnings per share are reflective of the 5% stock dividend paid in April, 2003.  The annualized return on average assets was 1.20% and 1.01% for the first three months of 2003 and 2002.  The Company’s annualized return on average equity was 15.37% and 13.64% for the three months ended March 31, 2003 and 2002.

 

Net Interest Income.  The Company’s primary source of income is net interest income and is determined by the difference between interest income and fees derived from earning assets and interest paid on interest bearing liabilities.  Net interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2003 totaled $10,789,000 and represented an increase of $1,463,000 or 16% when compared to the $9,326,000 achieved during the three months ended March 31, 2002.

 

Total interest and fees on earning assets were $14,643,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2003, an increase of $766,000 or 6% from the $13,877,000 for the same period in 2002.  The level of interest income is affected by changes in volume of and rates earned on interest-earning assets.  Interest-earning assets consist primarily of loans, investment securities and federal funds sold.  The increase in total interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2003 was primarily the result of an increase in volume of interest earning assets.  Average interest-earning assets for the three months ended March 31, 2003 were $934,810,000 compared with $811,208,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2002, an increase of $123,602,000 or 15%.

 

Interest expense is a function of the volume of and the rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities.  Interest-bearing liabilities consist primarily of certain deposits and borrowed funds.  Total interest expense was $3,854,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2003, compared with $4,551,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2002, a decrease of $697,000 or 15%. This decrease was primarily the result of a decrease in the interest rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities. Average interest-bearing liabilities were $769,322,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2003 compared with $687,335,000 for the same three months in 2002, an increase of $81,987,000 or 12%.  Average interest rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities were 2.03% for the three months ending March 31, 2003 compared with 2.69% for the same three months of 2002, a decrease in interest rates paid of 66 basis points or 25%.

 

The increase in interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities is primarily the result of increased market penetration within our target markets which has been accomplished by increasing the utilization of existing facilities and the addition of branches in San Francisco and Stockton, California.

 

12

 

The Company’s taxable equivalent net interest margin, the ratio of net interest income to average interest-earning assets, was 4.74% for the three months ended March 31, 2003 compared with 4.73% for the same period in 2002.  Net interest margin provides a measurement of the Company’s ability to employ funds profitably during the period being measured.  The Company’s slight increase in net interest margin was primarily attributable to the Company’s ability to increase the loan percentage within interest-earning assets.  Loans as a percentage of average interest-earning assets increased to 68% for the three months ended March 31, 2003 compared with 65% for the three months ended March 31, 2002.

 

Average Balances And Rates Earned And Paid.  The following table presents condensed average balance sheet information for the Company, together with interest rates earned and paid on the various sources and uses of its funds for each of the periods indicated.  Nonaccruing loans are included in the calculation of the average balances of loans, but the nonaccrued interest on such loans is excluded.

 

AVERAGE BALANCE SHEET & ANALYSIS OF NET INTEREST EARNINGS

 

		Three months ended March 31, 2003								Three months ended March 31, 2002
		Average Balance			Taxable Equivalent Interest			Taxable Equivalent Yield/rate		Average Balance			Taxable Equivalent Interest			Taxable Equivalent Yield/rate
		(Dollars in thousands)
Assets
Federal funds sold		$	13,349		$	39		1.18	%	$	2,837		$	12		1.72	%
Time deposits at other financial institutions		559			2			1.45		500			2			1.62
Taxable investment securities (1)		256,905			2,977			4.70		248,697			3,443			5.61
Nontaxable investment securities (1)		28,908			434			6.09		28,958			428			5.99
Loans, gross: (2)		635,089			11,333			7.24		530,216			10,137			7.75
Total interest-earning assets:		934,810			14,785			6.41		811,208			14,022			7.01
Allowance for loan losses		(12,390		)						(10,044		)
Cash and due from banks		32,575								28,090
Premises and equipment, net		14,343								13,128
Interest receivable and other assets		38,876								38,672
Total assets		$	1,008,214							$	881,054
Liabilities And Shareholders’ Equity
Negotiable order of withdrawal		$	117,514		$	14		0.05		$	97,617		$	54		0.22
Savings deposits		224,096			580			1.05		210,435			831			1.60
Time deposits		315,352			2,109			2.71		284,395			2,718			3.88
Other borrowings		112,360			1,151			4.15		94,888			948			4.05
Total interest-bearing liabilities		769,322			3,854			2.03		687,335			4,551			2.69
Noninterest-bearing deposits		148,426								116,556
Accrued interest, taxes and other liabilities		5,635								5,929
Total liabilities		923,383								809,820
Capital Securities and other minority interests		6,031								6,000
Total shareholders’ equity		78,800								65,234
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity		$	1,008,214							$	881,054
Net interest income and margin (3)					$	10,931		4.74	%				$	9,471		4.73	%

 

(1)                                  Tax-equivalent adjustments included in the nontaxable investment securities portfolio are $107,000 and $101,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively.  Tax equivalent adjustments included in the taxable investment securities created by a dividends received deduction were $35,000 and $45,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2003 and 2002.

(2)                                  Amounts of interest earned includes loan fees of $361,000 and $197,000 for March 31, 2003 and 2002 respectively.

(3)                                  Net interest margin is computed by dividing net interest income by total average interest-earning assets.

 

13

 

Net Interest Income Changes Due To Volume And Rate.  The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, a summary of the changes in average asset and liability balances and interest earned and interest paid resulting from changes in average asset and liability balances (volume) and changes in average interest rates and the total net change in interest income and expenses.  The changes in interest due to both rate and volume have been allocated to volume and rate changes in proportion to the relationship of the absolute dollar amount of the change in each.

 

Net Interest Income Variance Analysis:

 

 

Provision For Loan Losses.  The provision for loan losses for the three months ended March 31, 2003 was $671,000 compared with $780,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2002, a decrease of $109,000 or 14%. See “Allowance for Loan Losses” contained herein.  As of March 31, 2003 the allowance for loan losses was $12,690,000 or 1.94% of total loans which compares to the allowance for loan losses of $12,134,000 or 1.91% of total loans as of December 31, 2002.  At March 31, 2003, nonperforming assets totaled $2,248,000 or 0.21% of total assets, nonperforming loans totaled $2,188,000 or 0.33% of total loans and the allowance for loan losses totaled 580% of nonperforming loans.  At December 31, 2002, nonperforming assets totaled $2,443,000 or 0.24% of total assets, nonperforming loans totaled $2,383,000 or 0.38% of total loans and the allowance for loan losses totaled 509% of nonperforming loans.  No assurance can be given that nonperforming loans will not increase or that the allowance for loan losses will be adequate to cover losses inherent in the loan portfolio.

 

Noninterest Income.  Noninterest income increased by $547,000 or 31% to $2,326,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2003 compared with $1,779,000 in the same period during 2002.  Service charges on deposit accounts increased by $150,000 or 13% to $1,277,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2003 compared with $1,127,000 for the same period in 2002.  The increase in fees is the result of increased customer use of fee based products.  Other income increased by $397,000 or 61% for the three month period ended March 31, 2003 when compared to the same period in 2002.  The primary source of this increased other income is the sale of the consumer credit card portfolio in March, 2003 for a gain of $82,000, the gain on sale of foreclosure property with a book basis of $0 for an $81,000 gain,

 

14

 

and the $127,000 in first quarter, 2003 asset management fees generated by Regency Investment Advisors, Incorporated.  Regency Investment Advisors, Incorporated was acquired in June, 2002.

 

Noninterest Expense.  Noninterest expenses increased by $1,088,000 or 15% to $8,513,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2003 compared with $7,425,000 for the same period in 2002.  The primary components of noninterest expenses were salaries and employee benefits, premises expenses, occupancy expenses, equipment expenses, professional fees, marketing expenses, and other operating expenses.

 

For the three months ended March 31, 2003, salaries and related benefits increased by $559,000 or 14% to $4,503,000 from the $3,944,000 recorded for the same period in 2002. The salary expense increase was primarily the result of normal salary progression.  Premises and occupancy expenses increased by $101,000 or 18% to $670,000 for the three months ending March 31, 2003 from $569,000 during the same period in 2002.  The primary reason for the increase in occupancy costs in 2003 is related to retrofit charges for branch facilities in Atwater, Fresno, and Merced.  Equipment expenses increased by $43,000 or 6% to $759,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2003 from the $716,000 experienced during the same period in 2002.  When comparing the results of the three months ending March 31, 2003 to three months ending March 31, 2002, professional fees increased by $21,000 or 8%, marketing expenses increased by $72,000 or 38%, goodwill and intangible amortization expense were constant at $170,000, supplies expense increased by $49,000 or 26%, dividend expense on Capital Securities decreased by $1,000 or less than 1% and other expenses increased $244,000 or 20% from 2002 levels. Increased professional fees in 2003 were the result of an increased use of consultants used to identify new business profitability strategies.  The increased other expenses were the result of increased operating losses and supplies usage.

 

Provision For Income Taxes.  The Company recorded an increase of $228,000 or 34% in the income tax provision to $904,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2003 compared to the $676,000 recorded for the same period in 2002.  During the first quarter of 2003 and 2002, the Company achieved an effective tax rate of 23%.  The effective tax rate was constant, with the increase in provision for income taxes caused primarily by a volume increase in pretax income.  Effective tax rates below statutory tax rate levels have been achieved primarily through the continued utilization of a real estate investment trust established during the fourth quarter of 2001 that provides the Company with a means to potentially generate future additional capital for the Bank as well as to currently reduce state income tax expense.

 

Financial Condition

 

Total assets at March 31, 2003 were $1,049,678,000, an increase of $15,468,000 or 1% compared with total assets of $1,034,210,000 at December 31, 2002.  Net loans were $642,638,000 at March 31, 2003, an increase of $20,999,000 or 3% compared with net loans of $621,639,000 at December 31, 2002.  Deposits were $806,771,000 at March 31, 2003, a decrease of $27,608,000 or 3% compared with deposits of $834,379,000 at December 31, 2002.  The increase in total assets of the Company between December 31, 2002 and March 31, 2003 was primarily the result of an increase in borrowings that were obtained to fund additional purchases of investment securities.

 

Total shareholders’ equity was $79,881,000 at March 31, 2003, an increase of $2,712,000 or 4% from the $77,169,000 at December 31, 2002. The growth in shareholders’ equity between December 31, 2002 and March 31, 2003 was achieved through the retention of accumulated earnings which was partially offset by a decline in other comprehensive income.  Other comprehensive income consists of

 

15

 

changes in the fair market value compared to book value of available for sale investment securities and valuation changes in the Bank’s interest rate swap, net of estimated federal and state income taxes.

 

Off-Balance Sheet Commitments.  The following table shows the distribution of the Company’s undisbursed loan commitments at the dates indicated.

 

 

Other Interest-Earning Assets.  The following table relates to other interest-earning assets not disclosed previously for the dates indicated.  This item consists of a salary continuation plan for the Company’s executive management and deferred retirement benefits for participating board members.  The plan is informally linked with universal life insurance policies for the salary continuation plan.  Income from these policies is reflected in noninterest income.

 

(Dollars in thousands)		At March 31, 2003			At December 31, 2002
Cash surrender value of life insurance		$	20,462		$	17,240

 

Nonperforming Assets.  Nonperforming assets include nonaccrual loans, loans 90 days or more past due, restructured loans and other real estate owned.

 

Nonperforming loans are those which the borrower fails to perform in accordance with the original terms of the obligation and include loans on nonaccrual status, loans past due 90 days or more and restructured loans.  The Company generally places loans on nonaccrual status and accrued but unpaid interest is reversed against the current year’s income when interest or principal payments become 90 days or more past due unless the outstanding principal and interest is adequately secured and, in the opinion of management, is deemed in the process of collection.  Interest income on nonaccrual loans is recorded on a cash basis.  Payments may be treated as interest income or return of principal depending upon management’s opinion of the ultimate risk of loss on the individual loan.  Cash payments are treated as interest income where management believes the remaining principal balance is fully collectible.  Additional loans not 90 days past due may also be placed on nonaccrual status if management reasonably believes the borrower will not be able to comply with the contractual loan repayment terms and collection of principal or interest is in question.

 

A “restructured loan” is a loan on which interest accrues at a below market rate or upon which certain principal has been forgiven so as to aid the borrower in the final repayment of the loan, with any interest previously accrued, but not yet collected, being reversed against current income.  Interest is reported on a cash basis until the borrower’s ability to service the restructured loan in accordance with its terms is established.  The Company had no restructured loans as of the dates indicated in the table below.

 

16

 

The following table summarizes nonperforming assets of the Company at March 31, 2003 and December 31, 2002:

 

 

Contractual accrued interest income on loans on nonaccrual status as of March 31, 2003 and 2002, that would have been recognized if the loans had been current in accordance with their original terms was approximately $41,000 and $267,000, respectively.

 

At March 31, 2003, nonperforming assets represented ..21% of total assets, a decrease of 3 basis point when compared to the .24% at December 31, 2002.  Nonperforming loans represented .33% of total loans at March 31, 2003, a decrease of 5 basis points compared to the .38% at December 31, 2002.  Nonperforming loans that were secured by first deeds of trust on real property were $0 at March 31, 2003 and December 31, 2002.   Other forms of collateral such as inventory and equipment secured the nonperforming loans as of each date.  No assurance can be given that the collateral securing nonperforming loans will be sufficient to prevent losses on such loans.

 

The decrease in nonperforming loans and nonperforming assets as of March 31, 2003 compared with their levels as of December 31, 2002, was due to a slight decrease in the nonperforming agricultural segment of the loan portfolio.

 

At March 31, 2003 and December 31, 2002, the Company had $60,000 invested in one property, respectively, that had been acquired through foreclosure.  The property was carried at the lower of its estimated market value, as evidenced by an independent appraisal, or the recorded investment in the related loan, less estimated selling expenses.  At foreclosure, if the fair value of the real estate is less than the Company’s recorded investment in the related loan, a charge is made to the allowance for loan losses.  The Company expects to sell most of these properties within a twelve month period.  During the first quarter of 2003, one foreclosure property was acquired and sold for $81,000 that had no assigned book value for a gain on sale of $81,000.  No assurance can be given that the Company will sell the remaining property during 2003 or at any time or the amount for which the property might be sold.

 

Management defines impaired loans, regardless of past due status on loans, as those on which principal and interest are not expected to be collected under the original contractual loan repayment terms.  An impaired loan is charged off at the time management believes the collection process has been exhausted.  At March 31, 2003 and December 31, 2002, impaired loans were measured based on the present value of future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective rate, the loan’s observable market price or the fair value of collateral if the loan is collateral-dependent.  Impaired loans at March 31, 2003

 

17

 

were $2,188,000 for which the Company made provisions to the allowance for loan losses of approximately $363,000.

 

Except for loans that are disclosed above, there were no assets as of March 31, 2003, where known information about possible credit problems of borrower causes management to have serious doubts as to the ability of the borrower to comply with the present loan repayment terms and which may become nonperforming assets.  Given the magnitude of the Company’s loan portfolio, however, it is always possible that current credit problems may exist that may not have been discovered by management.

 

Allowance for Loan Losses

 

The following table summarizes the loan loss experience of the Company for the three months ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, and for the year ended December 31, 2002.

 

		March 31						December 31 2002
		2003			2002
		(Dollars in thousands)
Allowance for Loan Losses:
Balance at beginning of period		$	12,134		$	9,743		$	9,743
Provision for loan losses		671			780			4,151
Charge-offs:
Commercial and agricultural		6			218			1,504
Consumer		306			262			1,085
Total charge-offs		312			480			2,589
Recoveries
Commercial and agricultural		69			19			233
Consumer		128			167			596
Total recoveries		197			186			829
Net charge-offs		115			294			1,760
Balance at end of period		$	12,690		$	10,229		$	12,134
Loans outstanding at period-end		$	655,328		$	547,751		$	633,733
Average loans outstanding		$	635,089		$	530,216		$	576,156
Annualized net charge-offs to average loans		0.07		%	0.22		%	0.31		%
Allowance for loan losses
To total loans		1.94		%	1.87		%	1.91		%
To nonperforming assets		564.50		%	182.47		%	496.56		%

 

The Company maintains an allowance for loan losses at a level considered by management to be adequate to cover the inherent risks of loss associated with its loan portfolio under prevailing and anticipated economic conditions.  In determining the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, management takes into consideration growth trends in the portfolio, examination of financial institution supervisory authorities, prior loan loss experience for the Company, concentrations of credit risk, delinquency trends, general economic conditions, the interest rate environment and internal and external credit reviews.  In addition, the risks management considers vary depending on the nature of the loan.  The normal risks considered by management with respect to agricultural loans include the fluctuating value of the collateral, changes in weather conditions and the availability of adequate water resources in the Company’s local market area.  The normal risks considered by management with respect to real estate construction loans include fluctuation in real estate values, the demand for improved commercial and

 

18

 

industrial properties and housing, the availability of permanent financing in the Company’s market area and borrowers’ ability to obtain permanent financing.  The normal risks considered by management with respect to real estate mortgage loans include fluctuations in the value of real estate.  Additionally, the Company relies on data obtained through independent appraisals for significant properties to determine loss exposure on nonperforming loans.

 

The balance in the allowance is affected by the amounts provided from operations, amounts charged off and recoveries of loans previously charged off.  The Company recorded provisions for loan losses in the first three months of 2003 of $671,000 compared with $780,000 in the same period of 2002. The decrease in loan loss provisions in 2003 was recorded to coincide with the lower level of charge-offs experienced in the first quarter of 2003 in comparison to the same quarter in 2002.  The Company’s charge-offs, net of recoveries, were $115,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2003 compared with $294,000 for the same three months in 2002.  The decrease in net charge-offs for the first quarter of 2003 was primarily due to decreased charge-offs that occurred within the commercial and agricultural segment of the loan portfolio.  The decreased charge-offs in this segment of the portfolio are primarily attributable to a tightening of the credit standards in this segment of the loan portfolio that has occurred.

As of March 31, 2003, the allowance for loan losses was $12,690,000 or 1.94% of total loans outstanding, compared with $12,134,000 or 1.91% of total loans outstanding as of December 31, 2002 and $10,229,000 or 2.87% of total loans outstanding as of March 31, 2002.

 

The Company uses a method developed by management for determining the appropriate level of its allowance for loan losses.  This method applies relevant risk factors to the entire loan portfolio, including nonperforming loans.  The methodology is based, in part, on the Company’s loan grading and classification system.  The Company grades its loans through internal reviews and periodically subjects loans to external reviews which then are assessed by the Company’s audit committee and management.  Credit reviews are performed on a monthly basis and the quality grading process occurs on a quarterly basis. Risk factors applied to the performing loan portfolio are based on the Company’s past loss history considering the current portfolio’s characteristics, current economic conditions and other relevant factors.  General reserves are applied to various categories of loans at percentages ranging up to 1.8% based on the Company’s assessment of credit risks for each category.  Risk factors are applied to the carrying value of each classified loan: (i) loans internally graded “Watch” or “Special Mention” carry a risk factor from 1.0% to 2.0%; (ii) ”Substandard” loans carry a risk factor from 15% to 40% depending on collateral securing the loan, if any; (iii) “Doubtful” loans carry a 50% risk factor; and (iv) “Loss” loans are charged off 100%.  In addition, a portion of the allowance is specially allocated to identified problem credits.  The analysis also includes reference to factors such as the delinquency status of the loan portfolio, inherent risk by type of loans, industry statistical data, recommendations made by the Company’s regulatory authorities and outside loan reviewers, and current economic environment.  Important components of the overall credit rating process are the asset quality rating process and the internal loan review process.

 

The allowance is based on estimates and ultimate future losses may vary from current estimates.  It is always possible that future economic or other factors may adversely affect the Company’s borrowers, and thereby cause loan losses to exceed the current allowance.  In addition, there can be no assurance that future economic or other factors will not adversely affect the Company’s borrowers, or that the Company’s asset quality may not deteriorate through rapid growth, failure to enforce underwriting standards, failure to maintain appropriate underwriting standards, failure to maintain an adequate number of qualified loan personnel, failure to identify and monitor potential problem loans or for other reasons, and thereby cause loan losses to exceed the current allowance.

 

19

 

The allocation of the allowance to loan categories is an estimate by management of the relative risk characteristics of loans in those categories.  No assurance can be given that losses in one or more loan categories will not exceed the portion of the allowance allocated to that category or even exceed the entire allowance.

 

External Factors Affecting Asset Quality.  As a result of the Company’s loan portfolio mix, the future quality of its assets could be affected by adverse economic trends in its region or in the agricultural community.  These trends are beyond the control of the Company.

 

California is an earthquake-prone region.  Accordingly, a major earthquake could result in material loss to the Company.  At times the Company’s service area has experienced other natural disasters such as floods and droughts.  The Company’s properties and substantially all of the real and personal property securing loans in the Company’s portfolio are located in California.  The Company faces the risk that many of its borrowers face uninsured property damage, interruption of their businesses or loss of their jobs from earthquakes, floods or droughts.  As a result these borrowers may be unable to repay their loans in accordance with their terms and the collateral for such loans may decline significantly in value.  The Company’s service area is a largely agricultural region and therefore is highly dependent on a reliable supply of water for irrigation purposes.  The area obtains nearly all of its water from the run-off of melting snow in the mountains of the Sierra Nevada to the east.  Although such sources have usually been available in the past, water supply can be adversely affected by light snowfall over one or more winters or by any diversion of water from its present natural courses.  Any such natural disaster could impair the ability of many of the Company’s borrowers to meet their obligations to the Company.

 

Parts of California have experienced significant floods in the late 1990s. No assurance can be given that future flooding will not have an adverse impact on the Company and its borrowers and depositors.

 

Liquidity. In order to maintain adequate liquidity, the Company must have sufficient resources available at all times to meet its cash flow requirements.  The need for liquidity in a banking institution arises principally to provide for deposit withdrawals, the credit needs of its customers and to take advantage of investment opportunities as they arise.  The Company may achieve desired liquidity from both assets and liabilities.  The Company considers cash and deposits held in other banks, federal funds sold, other short term investments, maturing loans and investments, payments of principal and interest on loans and investments and potential loan sales as sources of asset liquidity.  Deposit growth and access to credit lines established with correspondent banks and market sources of funds are considered by the Company as sources of liability liquidity.  The holding company’s primary source of liquidity is from dividends received from the Bank.  Dividends from the Bank are subject to certain regulatory restrictions.

 

The Company reviews its liquidity position on a regular basis based upon its current position and expected trends of loans and deposits. These assets include cash and deposits in other banks, available-for-sale securities and federal funds sold.  The Company’s liquid assets totaled $289,655,000 and $305,075,000 on March 31, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively, and constituted 28% and 29% of total assets on those dates.  Liquidity is also affected by the collateral requirements of its public deposits and certain borrowings.  Total pledged securities were $262,568,000 at March 31, 2003 compared with $193,962,000 at December 31, 2002.

 

Although the Company’s primary sources of liquidity include liquid assets and a stable deposit base, the Company maintains lines of credit with the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco, Pacific Coast Bankers’ Bank, Union Bank of California, Wells Fargo

 

20

 

Bank and First Tennessee Bank aggregating $219,112,000 of which $146,904,000 was outstanding as of March 31, 2003 and $100,841,000 was outstanding as of December 31, 2002. The increase in borrowings outstanding during the first quarter of 2003 produced an inflow of funds that were used to purchase additional investment securities.  Management believes that the Company maintains adequate amounts of liquid assets to meet its liquidity needs.  The Company’s liquidity might be insufficient if deposit withdrawals were to exceed anticipated levels.  Deposit withdrawals can increase if a company experiences financial difficulties or receives adverse publicity for other reasons, or if its pricing, products or services are not competitive with those offered by other institutions.

 

Capital Resources.  Capital serves as a source of funds and helps protect depositors against potential losses.  The primary source of capital for the Company has been internally generated capital through retained earnings.  The Company’s shareholders’ equity increased by $2,712,000 or 3.5% from December 31, 2002 to March 31, 2003.

 

The Company is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies.  Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by the regulators that, if undertaken, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial statements.  Management believes, as of March 31, 2003, that the Company and the Bank met all applicable capital requirements.  The Company’s leverage capital ratio at March 31, 2003 was 8.12% as compared with 7.68% as of December 31, 2002.  The Company’s total risk based capital ratio at March 31, 2003 was 11.14% as compared to 10.74% as of December 31, 2002.

 

The Company’s and Bank’s actual capital amounts and ratios met all regulatory requirements as of March 31, 2003 and were summarized as follows:

 

Dollars in thousands		Actual					For Capital Adequacy Purposes					To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions:
		Amount			Ratio		Amount			Ratio		Amount			Ratio
Consolidated
As of March 31, 2003
Total capital (to risk weighted assets)		$	91,920		11.14	%	$	65,999		8.0	%	$	82,498		10.0	%
Tier 1 capital (to risk weighted assets)		81,578			9.89		32,999			4.0		49,499			6.0
Leverage ratio*		81,578			8.12		40,202			4.0		50,253			5.0
The Bank:
As of March 31, 2003
Total capital (to risk weighted assets)		$	88,089		10.70	%	$	65,838		8.0	%	$	82,298		10.0	%
Tier 1 capital (to risk weighted assets)		77,772			9.45		32,919			4.0		49,379			6.0
Leverage ratio*		77,772			7.75		40,134			4.0		50,168			5.0

 

* The leverage ratio consists of Tier 1 capital divided by adjusted quarterly average assets.  The minimum leverage ratio is 3 percent for banking organizations that do not anticipate significant growth and that have well-diversified risk, excellent asset quality and in general, are considered top-rated banks.

 

The Company has no formal dividend policy, and dividends are issued solely at the discretion of the Company’s Board of Directors, subject to compliance with regulatory requirements.  In order to pay any cash dividends, the Company must receive payments of dividends or management fees from the Bank.  There are certain regulatory limitations on the payment of cash dividends by banks.

 

Deposits.  Deposits are the Company’s primary source of funds.  At March 31, 2003, the Company had a deposit mix of 28% in savings deposits, 39% in time deposits, 14% in interest-bearing

 

21

 

checking accounts and 19% in noninterest-bearing demand accounts.  Noninterest-bearing demand deposits enhance the Company’s net interest income by lowering its costs of funds.

 

The Company obtains deposits primarily from the communities it serves.  No material portion of its deposits has been obtained from or is dependent on any one person or industry.  The Company’s business is not seasonal in nature.  The Company accepts deposits in excess of $100,000 from customers.  These deposits are priced to remain competitive.  At March 31, 2003, the Company had brokered deposits of $18,461,000.

 

Maturities of time certificates of deposits of $100,000 or more outstanding at March 31, 2003 and December 31, 2002 are summarized as follows:

 

		March 31, 2003			December 31, 2002
		(Dollars in thousands)
Three months or less		$	21,626		$	69,661
Over three to six months		48,979			38,863
Over six to twelve months		40,210			23,319
Over twelve months		42,001			28,872
Total		$	152,816		$	160,715

 

Borrowed Funds

 

The increase in other borrowings during the first quarter of 2003 was primarily due to the use of a leveraged investment strategy that uses additional FHLB borrowings to fund purchases of investment securities within the Bank’s investment portfolio.

 

Return on Equity and Assets

 

		Three months ended March 31 2003		Three months ended March 31 2002		Year ended December 31 2002
Annualized return on average assets		1.20	%	1.01	%	1.09	%
Annualized return on average equity		15.37	%	13.64	%	14.94	%
Average equity to average assets		7.82	%	7.40	%	7.29	%

 

Impact of Inflation

 

The primary impact of inflation on the Company is its effect on interest rates.  The Company’s primary source of income is net interest income which is affected by changes in interest rates.  The Company attempts to limit inflation’s impact on its net interest margin through management of rate sensitive assets and liabilities and the analysis of interest rate sensitivity.  The effect of inflation on premises and equipment, as well as on interest expenses, has not been significant for the periods covered in this report.

 

22

 

Item 3.                    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

 

In the normal course of business, the Company is exposed to market risk which includes both price and liquidity risk.  Price risk is created from fluctuations in interest rates and the mismatch in repricing characteristics of assets, liabilities, and off balance sheet instruments at a specified point in time.  Mismatches in interest rate repricing among assets and liabilities arise primarily through the interaction of the various types of loans versus the types of deposits that are maintained as well as from management’s discretionary investment and funds gathering activities.  Liquidity risk arises from the possibility that the Company may not be able to satisfy current and future financial commitments or that the Company may not be able to liquidate financial instruments at market prices.  Risk management policies and procedures have been established and are utilized to manage the Company’s exposure to market risk.  Quarterly testing of the Company’s assets and liabilities under both increasing and decreasing interest rate environments are performed to insure the Company does not assume a magnitude of risk that is outside approved policy limits.

 

The Company’s success is largely dependent upon its ability to manage interest rate risk.  Interest rate risk can be defined as the exposure of the Company’s net interest income to adverse movements in interest rates.  Although the Company manages other risks, such as credit and liquidity risk in the normal course of its business, management considers interest rate risk to be its most significant market risk and could potentially have the largest material effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.  Correspondingly, the overall strategy of the Company is to manage interest rate risk, through balance sheet structure, to be interest rate neutral.

 

The Company’s interest rate risk management is the responsibility of the Asset/Liability Management Committee (ALCO), which reports to the Board of Directors.  ALCO establishes policies that monitors and coordinates the Company’s sources, uses and pricing of funds.  ALCO is also involved in formulating the economic projections for the Company’s budget and strategic plan.  ALCO sets specific rate sensitivity limits for the Company.  ALCO monitors and adjusts the Company’s exposure to changes in interest rates to achieve predetermined risk targets that it believes are consistent with current and expected market conditions.  Balance sheet management personnel monitor the asset and liability changes on an ongoing basis and provide report information and recommendations to the ALCO committee in regards to those changes.

 

It is the opinion of management there has been no material change in the Company’s market risk during the first quarter of 2003 when compared to the level of market risk at December 31, 2002.  If interest rates were to suddenly and materially fall from levels experienced during the first quarter of 2003, the Company could become susceptible to an increased level of market risk.

 

23

 

Item 4.                    Controls and Procedures

 

Evaluation Of Disclosure Controls And Procedures

 

Under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including its chief executive office and chief financial officer, the Company conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures as defined by Rules 13a - 14(c) and 15d - 14(c)) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

 

The evaluation was completed within 90 days of the filing of this report (“Evaluation Date”). Based on the evaluation, the chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that as of the Evaluation Date the disclosure controls and procedures were adequate and effective, and that the material information required to be included in this report, including information from the Company’s consolidated subsidiaries, was properly recorded, processed, summarized and reported, and was made known to the chief executive officer and chief financial officer by others within the Company in a timely manner, particularly during the period when this annual report on Form 10-Q was being prepared.

 

Changes In Internal Controls

 

There were no significant changes in our internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect our disclosure controls subsequent to the Evaluation Date through the date of this filing of Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003, nor were there any significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in our internal controls that would require corrective action, so therefore there were no corrective actions taken.

 

24

 

PART II - Other Information

 

Item 1.                    Legal Proceedings

 

The Company is a party to routine litigation in the ordinary course of its business.  In the opinion of management, pending and threatened litigation is not likely to have a material adverse effect on the financial condition or results of operations of the Company.

 

Item 2.                    Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds.

 

None.

 

Item 3.                    Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

 

None.

 

Item 4.                    Submission of Matters to a Vote of Securities Holders.

 

None.

 

Item 5.                    Other Information.

 

In the opinion of management, there is no additional information relating to these periods being reported which warrants inclusion in the report.

 

25

 

Item 6.  Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K.

 

(a)                                  Exhibits.

 

Exhibit Number		Exhibit
3.1		Articles of Incorporation (filed as Exhibit 3.1 of the Company’s September 30, 1996 Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on or about November 14, 1996).
3.2		Bylaws (filed as Exhibit 3.2 of the Company’s September 30, 1996 Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on or about November 14, 1996)
3.3		Rights Agreement between Capital Corp of the West and Harris Trust Company of California dated as of September 26, 1997, including Form of Right Certificate attached thereto as Exhibit B (filed as Exhibit 4 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed with the SEC on October 1, 1997.
10		Employment Agreement between Thomas T. Hawker and Capital Corp. of the West (Filed as Exhibit 10 of the Company’s 1996 form 10K filed with the SEC on or about June 30, 1997)	*
10.1		Administration Construction Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.4 of the Company’s 1995 Form 10-K filed with the SEC on or about March 31, 1996).
10.2		Stock Option Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.6 of the Company’s 1995 Form 10-K filed with the SEC on or about March 31, 1996).
10.3		401(k) Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.7 of the Company’s 1995 Form 10-K filed with the SEC on or about March 31, 1996).
10.4		Employee Stock Ownership Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.8 of the Company’s 1995 Form 10-K filed with the SEC on or about March 31, 1996).
10.5		Purchase Agreement for three branches from Bank of America is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 2.1 Registration Statement on Form S-2 filed July 14, 1997, File No. 333-31193.
10.6		Change-in-Control Agreement between R. Dale McKinney and Capital Corp of the West (filed as Exhibit 10.6 of the Company’s 1999 Form 10-K with the SEC on or about March 17, 2000).	*
10.7		Deferred Compensation Agreement between members of the board of directors and Capital Corp of the West (filed as exhibit 10.7 of the Company’s 1999 Form 10-K with the SEC on or about March 17, 2000).	*
10.8		Executive Salary Continuation Agreement between certain members of executive management and Capital Corp of the West (filed as Exhibit 10.8 of the Company’s 1999 Form 10-K with the SEC in or about March 17, 2000).	*

 

26

 

10.9		Executive Salary Continuation Agreement between senior executive management and Capital Corp of the West (filed as Exhibit 10.9 of the Company’s 2001 Form 10-K with the SEC on or about March 29, 2002).	*
11		Statement Regarding the Computation of Earnings Per Share is incorporated herein by reference from Note 1 of the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.
13		Annual Report to Security Holders.
99.1		Certification of CEO pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
99.2		Certification of CFO pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
*		Denotes management contract or compensatory plan arrangement.

 

Reports on Form 8-K

 

None

 

27

 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

	CAPITAL CORP OF THE WEST
	(Registrant)
Date:  May 9, 2003	By	/s/	Thomas T. Hawker
			Thomas T. Hawker
			President and Chief Executive Officer
Date: May 9, 2003	By	/s/	R. Dale McKinney
			R. Dale McKinney
			Chief Financial Officer

 

28

 

CERTIFICATIONS UNDER

SECTION 302 OF

THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002*

I, Thomas T. Hawker, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Capital Corp of the West;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and

 

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

 

29

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

 

6. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

 

Date: May 9, 2003
	/s/ Thomas T. Hawker
Thomas T. Hawker
Chief Executive Officer

 

30

 

CERTIFICATIONS UNDER

SECTION 302 OF

THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002*

I, R. Dale McKinney, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Capital Corp of the West;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and

 

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

 

31

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

 

6. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

 

 

Date: May 9, 2003
	/s/ R. Dale McKinney
R. Dale McKinney
Chief Financial Officer

 

32

 

Exhibit Index

 

 

Exhibit		Description
99.1		Certification of Registrant’s Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
99.2		Certification of Registrant’s Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

 

33