UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
ý QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended January 24, 2003
OR
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 0-14429
Isco, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Nebraska |
|
47-0461807 |
(State of Incorporation) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4700 Superior Street, Lincoln, Nebraska |
|
68504-1398 |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
(402) 464-0231
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes ý No o
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock as of
February 28, 2003.
Common Stock, $0.10 par value |
|
5,683,698 |
Class |
|
Number of Shares |
ISCO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Item 1. |
Financial Statements |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
SIGNATURES |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
CERTIFICATIONS |
|
|
||||||
2
ISCO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Six months ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
Jan 24 |
|
Jan 25 |
|
Jan 24 |
|
Jan 25 |
|
||||
|
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net sales |
|
$ |
14,262 |
|
$ |
14,540 |
|
$ |
29,756 |
|
$ |
29,966 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
6,745 |
|
7,220 |
|
13,690 |
|
14,407 |
|
||||
|
|
7,517 |
|
7,320 |
|
16,066 |
|
15,559 |
|
||||
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Selling, general and administrative |
|
6,134 |
|
5,523 |
|
12,537 |
|
10,904 |
|
||||
Research and engineering |
|
1,570 |
|
1,237 |
|
3,235 |
|
2,613 |
|
||||
|
|
7,704 |
|
6,760 |
|
15,772 |
|
13,517 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Income (loss) from operations |
|
(187 |
) |
560 |
|
294 |
|
2,042 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Investment income |
|
163 |
|
174 |
|
332 |
|
353 |
|
||||
Interest expense |
|
(68 |
) |
(72 |
) |
(127 |
) |
(150 |
) |
||||
Other, net |
|
33 |
|
(16 |
) |
86 |
|
(79 |
) |
||||
|
|
128 |
|
86 |
|
291 |
|
124 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
(59 |
) |
646 |
|
585 |
|
2,166 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes |
|
(49 |
) |
285 |
|
164 |
|
775 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(10 |
) |
$ |
361 |
|
$ |
421 |
|
$ |
1,391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Basic earnings (loss) per share |
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Diluted earnings (loss) per share |
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Cash dividends per share |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Weighted average number of shares outstanding-basic |
|
5,673 |
|
5,664 |
|
5,673 |
|
5,660 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Additional shares assuming exercise of common stock equivalents and dilutive stock options |
|
|
|
240 |
|
218 |
|
219 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Weighted average number of shares outstanding-diluted |
|
5,673 |
|
5,904 |
|
5,891 |
|
5,879 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
ISCO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
(Columnar amounts in thousands)
|
|
Jan 24 |
|
Jul 26 |
|
||
|
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
1,782 |
|
$ |
633 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
5,259 |
|
5,646 |
|
||
Accounts receivable trade, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $147,000 and $144,000 |
|
8,884 |
|
9,901 |
|
||
Inventories (Note 3) |
|
9,653 |
|
9,046 |
|
||
Refundable income taxes |
|
545 |
|
|
|
||
Deferred income taxes |
|
1,095 |
|
1,345 |
|
||
Other current assets |
|
1,322 |
|
1,136 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total current assets |
|
28,540 |
|
27,707 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $17,136,000 and $16,091,000 |
|
14,405 |
|
14,535 |
|
||
Long-term investments |
|
7,319 |
|
9,334 |
|
||
Other assets (Note 4) |
|
4,402 |
|
4,302 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total assets |
|
$ |
54,666 |
|
$ |
55,878 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
976 |
|
$ |
1,303 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
4,238 |
|
4,057 |
|
||
Income taxes payable |
|
|
|
176 |
|
||
Short-term borrowing |
|
1,890 |
|
1,909 |
|
||
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
1,064 |
|
1,131 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total current liabilities |
|
8,168 |
|
8,576 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Deferred income taxes |
|
555 |
|
720 |
|
||
Long-term debt, less current portion |
|
557 |
|
1,006 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Preferred stock, $.10 par value, authorized 5,000,000 shares; issued none |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Common stock, $.10 par value, authorized 15,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 5,683,698 and 5,672,346 |
|
568 |
|
567 |
|
||
Additional paid-in capital |
|
38,485 |
|
38,371 |
|
||
Retained earnings |
|
6,341 |
|
6,602 |
|
||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (Note 5) |
|
(8 |
) |
36 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total shareholders equity |
|
45,386 |
|
45,576 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
54,666 |
|
$ |
55,878 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
ISCO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(Columnar amounts in thousands)
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
Jan 24 |
|
Jan 25 |
|
||
|
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net income |
|
$ |
421 |
|
$ |
1,391 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
1,246 |
|
1,183 |
|
||
Stock-based compensation |
|
95 |
|
228 |
|
||
Deferred income taxes |
|
70 |
|
290 |
|
||
Gain on sale of property and equipment |
|
(247 |
) |
(23 |
) |
||
Provision for doubtful accounts |
|
1 |
|
13 |
|
||
Undistributed (income) losses of AFTCO |
|
(4 |
) |
86 |
|
||
Change in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Accounts receivable-trade |
|
1,051 |
|
502 |
|
||
Inventories |
|
(540 |
) |
72 |
|
||
Refundable income taxes |
|
(545 |
) |
451 |
|
||
Other current assets |
|
(170 |
) |
(104 |
) |
||
Accounts payable |
|
(341 |
) |
289 |
|
||
Accrued expenses |
|
160 |
|
12 |
|
||
Income taxes payable |
|
(176 |
) |
|
|
||
Other |
|
(116 |
) |
(93 |
) |
||
Total adjustments |
|
484 |
|
2,906 |
|
||
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
905 |
|
4,297 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Proceeds from maturities of available-for-sale securities |
|
4,550 |
|
|
|
||
Proceeds from maturity of held-to-maturity securities |
|
2,630 |
|
6,500 |
|
||
Purchase of held-to-maturity securities |
|
(497 |
) |
(2,411 |
) |
||
Purchase of available-for-sale securities |
|
(4,326 |
) |
(7,749 |
) |
||
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment |
|
331 |
|
143 |
|
||
Purchase of property and equipment |
|
(1,107 |
) |
(1,070 |
) |
||
Other |
|
(24 |
) |
188 |
|
||
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
1,557 |
|
(4,399 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash dividends paid |
|
(682 |
) |
(283 |
) |
||
Net change in short-term borrowings |
|
(108 |
) |
26 |
|
||
Repayment of long-term debt |
|
(543 |
) |
(508 |
) |
||
Issuance of common stock and exercise of stock options |
|
20 |
|
59 |
|
||
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
(1,313 |
) |
(706 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net increase (decrease) |
|
1,149 |
|
(808 |
) |
||
Balance at beginning of year |
|
633 |
|
2,675 |
|
||
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
1,782 |
|
$ |
1,867 |
|
See Note 6 for supplemental cash flow information.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
ISCO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
January 24, 2003
(Unaudited)
(Columnar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
Note 1: In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contain all of the adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position of the Company and the results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented herein. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. Results of operations and cash flows for the current unaudited interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire fiscal year. Intercompany transactions and accounts have been eliminated.
While the Company believes that the disclosures presented are adequate to make the information not misleading, it is suggested that these condensed consolidated financial statements be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes to the consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended July 26, 2002.
Note 2: The Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, on July 27, 2002. SFAS No. 142 provides that goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives shall not be amortized and shall be tested for impairment on an annual basis. There was no impairment that resulted from adoption of this standard. The Company discontinued the amortization of equity method goodwill relating to the AFTCO joint venture upon adoption of this standard. Goodwill and other identifiable intangible assets with indefinite lives are not amortized and are tested annually for impairment. Impairment occurs when the fair value of the asset is less than its carrying amount. Identifiable intangible assets with definite lives are amortized over their estimated useful lives and tested for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of the asset may be impaired. Impairment occurs when the fair value of the asset is less than its carrying amount. If impaired, the intangible asset is written down to its fair value. The after tax impact of adopting this standard in fiscal 2002 would have been to increase fiscal 2002 earnings for the three and six months ended January 25, 2002 by approximately $19,000 and $38,000, respectively. Basic and diluted earnings per share amounts would not have changed on a pro forma basis.
Note 3: Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market, principally on the lastin, firstout (LIFO) basis. The composition of inventories was as follows:
|
|
Jan 24, 2003 |
|
July 26, 2002 |
|
||
Raw Materials |
|
$ |
3,319 |
|
$ |
3,076 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
3,124 |
|
3,173 |
|
||
Finished goods |
|
3,210 |
|
2,797 |
|
||
|
|
$ |
9,653 |
|
$ |
9,046 |
|
Had inventories been valued on the firstin, firstout (FIFO) basis, they would have been approximately $2,219,000 and $2,307,000 higher than reported on the LIFO basis at January 24, 2003 and July 26, 2002, respectively.
6
Note 4: Other assets were comprised of the following as of January 24, 2003 and July 26, 2002:
|
|
Jan 24, 2003 |
|
Jul 26, 2002 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Intangibles, net of accumulated amortization of $737,000 and $672,000 |
|
$ |
949 |
|
$ |
1,014 |
|
Investment in AFTCO |
|
566 |
|
563 |
|
||
Cash value of life insurance |
|
1,368 |
|
1,335 |
|
||
Notes receivable related party |
|
1,050 |
|
1,000 |
|
||
Other |
|
469 |
|
390 |
|
||
|
|
$ |
4,402 |
|
$ |
4,302 |
|
Note 5: Comprehensive income (loss), for the three month and six month periods ended January 24, 2003 and January 25, 2002, was as follows:
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Six months ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
Jan 24 |
|
Jan 25 |
|
Jan 24 |
|
Jan 25 |
|
||||
|
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(10 |
) |
$ |
361 |
|
$ |
421 |
|
$ |
1,391 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
net of income tax (tax benefit): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
(39 |
) |
14 |
|
(34 |
) |
(16 |
) |
||||
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities |
|
(9 |
) |
(1 |
) |
(10 |
) |
(10 |
) |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
(58 |
) |
$ |
374 |
|
$ |
377 |
|
$ |
1,365 |
|
Note 6: Supplemental Cash Flow Information
The Company made income tax payments of $789,000 and $11,000 during the six-month periods ended January 24, 2003 and January 25, 2002, respectively.
The Company made interest payments of $127,000 and $150,000 during the six-month periods ended January 24, 2003 and January 25, 2002, respectively.
Note 7: Involuntary Terminations
In January 2003, the Companys Board of Directors eliminated two corporate officer positions: Vice President of Sales and Marketing and Vice President of Corporate Development. In connection with the involuntary terminations, severance and related costs of approximately $0.2 million were recorded during the quarter ended January 24, 2003. These costs, which are included in selling, general and administrative expenses and accrued expenses in the condensed consolidated financial statements, will be paid within a year from the termination date, with the majority being paid by the end of fiscal year 2003.
7
Note 8: Legal Proceedings
The Company continues its activities related to its SWIFT column products and to the filed lawsuits by and against Cornell Research Foundation, Inc. (Cornell). A final arbitration hearing related to the scope of the Companys license is scheduled for early April. All other legal actions remain in their preliminary stages. The Company intends to pursue these matters vigorously and believes that it will prevail whether through court action or through any court-ordered or party-agreed-to arbitration. Details on these lawsuits can be found in Iscos annual report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2002 under Part I, Item 3, Legal Proceedings.
The Company began selling the new SWIFT columns late in the in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002. At this time, the revenues from SWIFT columns are not material to the overall revenues of the Company. The Company continues to invest in infrastructure to build and expand this column business. Details on the Companys investments in this area can be found in Iscos annual report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2002 under the section entitled Factors Affecting Future Results in Part I, Item 2, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition.
Note 9: New Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 148 (SFAS No. 148), Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation-Transition and Disclosure. SFAS No. 148 provides alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. In addition, SFAS No. 148 requires additional disclosure in the financial statements about the Companys method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method on reported results. The disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 148 are effective for annual financial statements for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2002 and for interim statements for periods beginning after December 15, 2002. The Company is evaluating whether to adopt the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based compensation and the alternative methods of transition for such a change.
In November 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 45, Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others (FIN 45). The initial recognition and measurement provisions of FIN 45 are effective for guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002. The disclosure requirements of FIN 45 are effective for interim and annual periods ending after December 15, 2002. There was no significant impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements as a result of adopting FIN 45.
8
Item 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contain trend analysis and other forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements within this document.
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth, for the three-month and six-month periods indicated, the percentages which certain components of the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations bear to net sales and the percentage of change of such components (based on actual dollars) compared with the same periods of the prior year.
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Six months ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
Jan 24 |
|
Jan 25 |
|
Change |
|
Jan 24 |
|
Jan 25 |
|
Change |
|
Net sales |
|
100.0 |
|
100.0 |
|
(1.9 |
) |
100.0 |
|
100.0 |
|
(0.7 |
) |
Cost of sales |
|
47.3 |
|
49.7 |
|
(6.6 |
) |
46.0 |
|
48.1 |
|
(5.0 |
) |
|
|
52.7 |
|
50.3 |
|
2.7 |
|
54.0 |
|
51.9 |
|
3.3 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general, & administrative |
|
43.0 |
|
38.0 |
|
11.1 |
|
42.1 |
|
36.4 |
|
15.0 |
|
Research & engineering |
|
11.0 |
|
8.5 |
|
26.9 |
|
10.9 |
|
8.7 |
|
23.8 |
|
|
|
54.0 |
|
46.5 |
|
14.0 |
|
53.0 |
|
45.1 |
|
16.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
(1.3 |
) |
3.8 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
6.8 |
|
(85.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment income |
|
1.1 |
|
1.2 |
|
(6.3 |
) |
1.1 |
|
1.2 |
|
(6.0 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
(0.5 |
) |
(0.5 |
) |
(5.6 |
) |
(0.4 |
) |
(0.5 |
) |
(15.3 |
) |
Other, net |
|
0.3 |
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
0.3 |
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
0.6 |
|
48.8 |
|
1.0 |
|
0.5 |
|
135.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
(0.4 |
) |
4.4 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
7.3 |
|
(73.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes |
|
(0.3 |
) |
2.0 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
2.6 |
|
(78.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
(0.1 |
) |
2.4 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
4.7 |
|
(69.8 |
) |
Our sales for the three-month and six-month periods ended January 24, 2003 were $14.3 million and $29.8 million, respectively. For the periods under review, our sales were 2 percent and 1 percent lower than for the respective periods of last year. Core products sales (wastewater samplers, flow meters, and liquid chromatography products) of $11.0 million for the quarter and $22.9 million for the six-month period, were up 3 percent as compared to the same periods of last year. In each of the periods, liquid chromatography and sampler products provided increased sales over the prior year, offset by a reduction in sales of flow meters. Sales of our non-core products (process monitoring, supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) and syringe pumps products) of $2.5 million for the quarter and $5.1 million for the six-month period were down 17 percent and 14 percent compared to the same periods of last year. For the current quarter, these results were driven by flat or decreased sales of all non-core products.
9
For the six-month period, SFE and process monitoring products reported sales declines, while syringe pumps posted sales increases over the prior year.
U.S. sales for the three months and six months were up 1 percent and up 2 percent, respectively. U.S. sales of our core products for the same periods increased 2 percent over the comparable periods of fiscal 2002. Samplers posted an increase for the three month period offset by decreases in flow meters and liquid chromatography products. Liquid chromatography products had increased sales for the six month period, offset by declines in samplers and flow meters. U.S. sales of our non-core products for the three-month period decreased by 9 percent and increased by 1 percent for the six-month comparisons. Declines in process monitoring and SFE product sales accounted for the decrease in the three and six-month periods, while syringe pumps posted sales increases in both periods.
International sales for the three months and six months were down 8 percent and 7 percent, respectively. Sales of our core products for the same periods were up 3 percent and 5 percent, respectively, over last year. Liquid chromatography products contributed to sales increases in the three month period, offset by declines in samplers and flow meters. For the six month period, sampler sales increased, offset by decreases in liquid chromatography products and flow meters. International sales of our non-core products for the three months and six months decreased by 21 percent in each period. Process monitoring products recorded increased sales for the three month period, while SFE products and syringe pump sales declined in the quarter. For the six month period, sales for all non-core products declined.
During the three months and six months, we received net orders of $14.0 million and $29.1 million, respectively. Net orders received were up 3 percent and up 1 percent compared to the same periods last year. The order backlog at January 24, 2003 was $4.6 million, down approximately 12 percent from the beginning of the fiscal year.
We incurred a net loss of $10,000 and generated operating income of $421,000, respectively, for the three months and six months ended January 24, 2003. For the same periods last year, net income was $361,000 and $1,391,000, respectively.
Our net income for the second quarter and six months of fiscal 2003 was down approximately $0.4 million and $1.0, respectively from the prior year. The primary factor in the decline was lower income from operations. The income from operations for the second quarter and six months of fiscal 2003 was down approximately $0.7 and $1.7 million, respectively, compared with the same periods of fiscal 2002. Positive shifts in the mix of our product lines resulted in gross margins, as a percentage of sales, of 52.7 and 54.0 percent for the three and six month periods, respectively, compared with 50.3 and 51.9 percent for the same periods last year, and provided additional gross margin dollars of $0.3 million and $0.6, respectively. This benefit was offset by operating expenses which increased by approximately $0.9 million for the quarter and $2.3 for the six month period.
The increase in operating expenses was driven by increases in both sales, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses and engineering expenses. The majority of the increase was in SG&A, which increased by approximately $0.6 million and $1.6 million for the quarter and six month periods, respectively, over the prior year. Increased staffing for the chromatography line, general wage increases, increased travel and exhibition expenses, and the replacement of an international dealer were primary drivers in the year-over-year SG&A increase. During the second quarter, we incurred additional SG&A costs of $0.2 million associated with severance packages related to a top-level reorganization, in which the Board of Directors has eliminated two corporate officer positions: Vice President of Sales and Marketing and Vice President of Corporate Development. Approximately $0.3 million and $0.6 million of the three month and six month increase, respectively, is attributed to marketing, sales, and legal expenditures for the new SWIFT chromatography media. Beginning in the second quarter of the prior fiscal year, and continuing through the second quarter of fiscal 2003, we increased the expenditure level for SG&A. This was due to our commitment to build the marketing and sales infrastructure to capitalize on market and technology opportunities in process monitoring, SWIFT columns and drug discovery applications of liquid chromatography.
10
These commitments are discussed in detail in our annual report on Form 10-K under the section titled Factors Affecting Future Results. Engineering expenses increased for the quarter and six months by $0.3 and $0.6 million, respectively, primarily from higher levels of outsourced product development activities.
Other income increased by $42,000 and $167,000, for the three-month and six-month periods ended January 24, 2003, respectively, as compared to the same periods of the previous year. This improvement was driven by improved earnings from AFTCO, Iscos joint venture. While our average investment balances were higher in the current year, lower yield rates resulted in a slight decrease in investment income for the three-month and six-month periods as compared with last year. Interest expense also decreased slightly for the three-month and six-month comparison due to our continued ability to reduce our outstanding fixed debt.
Our effective income tax rate for the three months and six months ended January 24, 2003 was 83.1 percent and 28.0 percent, respectively. For the same periods last year our effective income tax rates were 44.1 percent and 35.8 percent, respectively. The largest impact on the effective tax rate changes from the prior comparative periods was a result of the impact of exchange rate changes on foreign net operating loss carryforwards and the minimal absolute dollar amount of the loss during the quarter ended January 24, 2003.
Financial Condition and Liquidity
Our overall cash and investments decreased to $14.4 million at January 24, 2003 from $15.6 million at the end of fiscal year 2002, a decrease of $1.2 million. Operating activities generated $0.9 million of cash during the first half of fiscal 2003 compared with generating $4.3 million during the same period last year. The major factor in the decline was a change in operating assets and liabilities that resulted in a net reduction of approximately $1.8 million in operating cash flow, primarily driven by increases in income tax payments. During fiscal 2002, we received the benefits of U.S. net operating loss carry forwards to offset that years income tax liabilities. These benefits were fully utilized in fiscal 2002. The decline in net income accounted for approximately $1.0 million of the $3.4 million decline, with the adjustments for depreciation and amortization and other non operating assets and liabilities being at approximately the same level.
We invested the cash generated from maturities of investments of $7.2 million into long-term and short-term investments of $4.8 million. We utilized the remaining cash available from investment maturities to purchase a net of $0.8 million in equipment, used cash of $0.7 million for the repayment of long and short term bank obligations and used $0.7 million for dividends. Our net cash and cash equivalents position increased by $1.1 million for the first half of fiscal 2003 compared to a net decrease of $0.8 million in the first half of fiscal 2002.
At January 24, 2003, we had working capital of $20.4 million and a current ratio of 3.5:1. At period-end, our total long-term debt was $1.6 million with $1.1 million payable within the next year. In addition, we had lines of credit with various banks totaling $7.0 million of which approximately $4.9 million was available for future business needs.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 148 (SFAS No. 148), Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation-Transition and Disclosure. SFAS No. 148 provides alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. In addition, SFAS No. 148 requires additional disclosure in the financial statements about the Companys method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method on reported results. The disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 148 are effective for annual financial statements for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2002 and for interim statements for periods beginning after December 15, 2002. The Company is evaluating whether to adopt the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based compensation and the alternative methods of transition for such a change.
11
In November 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 45, Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others (FIN 45). The initial recognition and measurement provisions of FIN 45 are effective for guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002. The disclosure requirements of FIN 45 are effective for interim and annual periods ending after December 15, 2002. There was no significant impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements as a result of adopting FIN 45.
Critical Accounting Policies
Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable consist primarily of amounts due to us from normal business activities. We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts to reflect the expected uncollectibility of accounts receivable based on a combination of past collection history, aging of outstanding accounts receivables, and specific risks identified in the portfolio.
Inventories
Inventories consist of purchased materials, raw materials, in-process subassemblies, and finished goods. Inventory obsolescence cost has not historically been material and as a result we do not carry a reserve for obsolescence for the majority of our inventory. We review our inventory balances to determine if inventories can be sold at amounts equal to or greater than their carrying amounts. The review includes identification of slow-moving inventories, obsolete inventories, and discontinued products or lines of products. The identification process includes a review of historical performance of the inventory and current operational plans for the inventory. If our actual results differ from our expectations with respect to the inventory sales at amounts equal to or greater than their carrying amounts, we would be required to adjust our inventory balances accordingly. We use the link-chain method for valuing the majority of our inventory on a LIFO basis. Our pre-tax earnings were $88,000 higher for the six months ended January 24, 2003 than if the inventories were carried on a FIFO basis.
Revenue Recognition
Revenues are recorded when products are shipped to customers or, in instances where service is performed to customer requirements, upon the successful completion of such service. We are generally not contractually obligated to accept returns, except for defective products. Sales are shown net of returns and discounts.
Stock-Based Compensation
We have elected to account for fixed award stock options and nonemployee directors options under the provisions of APB No. 25 Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. As such, no compensation cost has been recorded in the financial statements relative to these options. We utilize the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the fair value of these options for disclosure purposes.
We account for performance based awards granted under our employee stock option plans in accordance with the provisions of APB 25. Options granted under the performance based awards are subject to variable accounting treatment until the number of options that will vest is known. Options not vested at the end of each performance year are cancelled. Compensation expense is recorded based on the difference between the closing market price at the date the shares vest and the exercise price as determined at the date the shares were granted.
Deferred stock units granted to nonemployee directors are accounted for in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. Accordingly, directors deferred stock units are recorded as compensation expense at estimated fair value on the date the units are earned by the director.
Joint Venture
We account for our investment in the AFTCO joint venture using the equity method of accounting.
12
Factors Affecting Future Results
As stated in our annual report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2002, we expected fiscal year 2003 to be a challenging year related to growth in the areas of net sales, net income, and cash flow. During the first half of fiscal 2003 our sales in the area of water quality have been adversely affected by the economic and political conditions we mentioned in our Form 10-K for fiscal 2002. In addition, we have been impacted by a slow down in the growth rate of liquid chromatography products focused on drug discovery applications due to pressure upon pharmaceutical firms to reduce spending and increase profits. We anticipate that these negative conditions will continue into the latter half of the fiscal year.
Our net income will also be affected as we maintain the marketing and sales infrastructure to capitalize on market and technology opportunities in process monitoring, SWIFT columns, and drug discovery applications of liquid chromatography. We believe we can deliver greater long-term value for our shareholders by maintaining these investments rather than reducing our commitment to strive for a year-over-year increase in net income.
In addition to the downward pressure from potentially lower net sales and operating income, our cash flows from operations for the year will be negatively impacted by our return to remitting income taxes. Cash flows in the prior two fiscal years benefited from the utilization of net operating losses carry forwards. While we are committed to improving our working capital management, we do not believe these improvements will offset the effect of the above items. In the aggregate, we anticipate that our overall cash and investments will remain flat, or decline slightly from the current level, over the remainder of the fiscal year.
Interest rate risk and currency exchange risks are the primary market risks to which we are exposed. We do not use derivative financial or commodity instruments. Our other financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, accounts and notes receivable, accounts and notes payable and long-term debt. Our cash and cash equivalents, accounts and notes receivable, and accounts and notes payable balances are generally short-term in nature and do not expose our company to material market risk. At January 24, 2003, we had approximately $1.6 million of fixed rate debt. In addition, we had $7.0 million of variable rate credit facilities, of which approximately $1.9 million was outstanding under these credit facilities. We do not believe that changes in interest rates on the debt and credit facilities would have a material effect on our results of operations, given our current obligations under these debt and credit facilities.
Related to currency exchange, international sales of our United States based operations are denominated in U.S. dollars and international sales of our German subsidiary are denominated in Euros. The currency exchange risk at the current level of activity is not material to our operating results or financial position. Our market risk resulting from the translation of the profit and loss of STIP and from our permanent investment in our foreign subsidiaries is not material.
There have been no material changes during the first six months of fiscal 2003 with respect to the Companys contractual obligations. Details of the Companys contractual obligations can be found in the Managements Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition section of the Companys fiscal 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Inflation
Inflation has not had, and is not expected to have, a material impact upon the Companys operations. The effect of inflation on our costs and our ability to pass on cost increases in the form of increased prices is dependent upon market conditions and the competitive environment.
13
Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The information required by this item is included in the section entitled Market Risk in Part I, Item 2, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition.
Item 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.
As required by Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), within the 90 days prior to the filing date of this report, the Company carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures. This evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of the Companys management, including the Companys Chief Executive Officer along with the Companys Chief Financial Officer. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer along with the Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported with the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms.
(b) Changes in Internal Control.
There are no significant changes in the Companys internal controls or, to the Companys knowledge, in other factors that could significantly affect such internal controls subsequent to the date of the Companys evaluation of its internal controls.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
The Company continues its activities related to its SWIFT column products and to the filed lawsuits by and against Cornell Research Foundation, Inc. (Cornell). A final arbitration hearing related to the scope of the Companys license is scheduled for early April. All other legal actions remain in their preliminary stages. The Company intends to pursue these matters vigorously and believes that it will prevail whether through court action or through any court-ordered or party-agreed-to arbitration. Details on these lawsuits can be found in Iscos annual report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2002 under Part I, Item 3, Legal Proceedings.
The Company began selling the new SWIFT columns late in the in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002. At this time, the revenues from SWIFT columns are not material to the overall revenues of the Company. The Company continues to invest in infrastructure to build and expand this column business. Details on the Companys investments in this area can be found in Iscos annual report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2002 under the section entitled Factors Affecting Future Results in Part I, Item 2, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition.
14
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
Our companys annual meeting of shareholders was held on December 12, 2002.
A. The following persons were elected to serve a two-year term on Isco, Inc.s Board of Directors
Nominee |
|
Votes |
||
|
|
In Favor |
|
Withheld |
James L. Carrier |
|
5,395,880 |
|
7,450 |
Douglas M. Grant |
|
5,379,997 |
|
23,333 |
Ronald K. Jester |
|
5,396,461 |
|
6,869 |
Harvey S. Perlman |
|
5,364,165 |
|
39,165 |
Item 6. |
|
|||
|
|
|
||
|
(a) |
Exhibits: |
||
|
Exhibit 99.1 |
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
(b) |
Reports on Form 8-K: No reports on Form 8-K have been filed during the quarter endedJanuary 24, 2003, or during the period from January 25, 2003 to the date of this quarterlyreport on Form 10-Q. |
||
|
|
|
||
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
ISCO, INC. |
||
|
|
|
|
Date: March 7, 2003 |
BY |
/s/ |
Robert W. Allington |
|
|
|
Robert W. Allington |
|
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
Date: March 7, 2003 |
BY |
/s/ |
Vicki L. Benne |
|
|
|
Vicki L. Benne |
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
15
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Public Law Number107-204), the Chief Executive Officer of the Company certifies that:
1) I have reviewed the report;
2) Based upon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact, or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3) Based upon my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this report fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the period presented in this report;
4) The Companys other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Company and have:
a) |
|
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
|
|
|
b) |
|
evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report (the Evaluation Date); |
|
|
|
c) |
|
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; |
5) The Companys other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Company board of directors (or persons performing equivalent functions):
a) |
|
all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial data and have identified for the Companys auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and |
|
|
|
b) |
|
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal controls; and |
6) The Companys other certifying officers have indicated in this report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
By: /s/Robert W. Allington |
Robert W. Allington |
Chief Executive Officer |
16
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Public Law Number107-204), the Chief Financial Officer of the Company certifies that:
1) I have reviewed the report;
2) Based upon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact, or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3) Based upon my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this report fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the period presented in this report;
4) The Companys other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Company and have:
a) |
|
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
|
|
|
b) |
|
evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report (the Evaluation Date); |
|
|
|
c) |
|
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; |
5) The Companys other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Company board of directors (or persons performing equivalent functions):
a) |
|
all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial data and have identified for the Companys auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and |
|
|
|
b) |
|
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal controls; and |
6) The Companys other certifying officers have indicated in this report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
By: /s/Vicki L. Benne |
Vicki L. Benne |
Chief Financial Officer & Treasurer |
17