UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
(Mark One)
ý |
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
||
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002 |
||
|
||
OR |
||
|
||
o |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 0-18630
CATHAY BANCORP, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware |
|
95-4274680 |
(State of other
jurisdiction of incorporation |
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
|
|
|
777 North Broadway, Los Angeles, California |
|
90012 |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
|
|
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (213) 625-4700 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes ý No o
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Common stock, $.01 par value, 17,999,066 shares outstanding as of November 1, 2002
CATHAY BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
3RD QUARTER 2002 REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
(Unaudited)
3
CATHAY BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share data) |
|
September 30, 2002 |
|
December 31, 2001 |
|
% change |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
65,646 |
|
$ |
73,514 |
|
(11 |
) |
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell |
|
30,000 |
|
13,000 |
|
131 |
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
95,646 |
|
86,514 |
|
11 |
|
||
Securities available-for-sale (amortized cost of $253,918 in 2002 and $241,788 in 2001) |
|
264,038 |
|
248,958 |
|
6 |
|
||
Securities held-to-maturity (estimated fair value of $396,832 in 2002 and $382,814 in 2001) |
|
378,543 |
|
374,356 |
|
1 |
|
||
Loans |
|
1,852,497 |
|
1,667,905 |
|
11 |
|
||
Less: Allowance for loan losses |
|
(23,132 |
) |
(23,973 |
) |
(4 |
) |
||
Unamortized deferred loan fees |
|
(4,225 |
) |
(3,900 |
) |
8 |
|
||
Loans, net |
|
1,825,140 |
|
1,640,032 |
|
11 |
|
||
Other real estate owned, net |
|
653 |
|
1,555 |
|
(58 |
) |
||
Investments in real estate, net |
|
22,060 |
|
17,727 |
|
24 |
|
||
Premises and equipment, net |
|
29,996 |
|
29,403 |
|
2 |
|
||
Customers liability on acceptances |
|
10,050 |
|
12,729 |
|
(21 |
) |
||
Accrued interest receivable |
|
12,433 |
|
14,545 |
|
(15 |
) |
||
Goodwill |
|
6,552 |
|
6,552 |
|
|
|
||
Other assets |
|
19,973 |
|
20,743 |
|
(4 |
) |
||
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,665,084 |
|
$ |
2,453,114 |
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Non-interest-bearing demand deposits |
|
$ |
291,222 |
|
$ |
260,427 |
|
12 |
|
Interest-bearing deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
NOW deposits |
|
140,751 |
|
135,650 |
|
4 |
|
||
Money market deposits |
|
172,353 |
|
136,806 |
|
26 |
|
||
Savings deposits |
|
281,943 |
|
252,322 |
|
12 |
|
||
Time deposits under $100 |
|
425,278 |
|
414,490 |
|
3 |
|
||
Time deposits of $100 or more |
|
963,930 |
|
922,653 |
|
4 |
|
||
Total deposits |
|
2,275,477 |
|
2,122,348 |
|
7 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
28,500 |
|
22,114 |
|
29 |
|
||
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank |
|
50,000 |
|
30,000 |
|
67 |
|
||
Acceptances outstanding |
|
10,050 |
|
12,729 |
|
(21 |
) |
||
Other liabilities |
|
21,932 |
|
19,912 |
|
10 |
|
||
Total liabilities |
|
2,385,959 |
|
2,207,103 |
|
8 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized, none issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 25,000,000 shares authorized, 18,291,844 issued and 18,006,544 outstanding in 2002 and 18,235,538 issued and 17,957,738 outstanding in 2001 |
|
183 |
|
182 |
|
1 |
|
||
Treasury stock, at cost (285,300 shares in 2002 and 277,800 in 2001) |
|
(7,604 |
) |
(7,342 |
) |
4 |
|
||
Additional paid-in-capital |
|
70,382 |
|
68,518 |
|
3 |
|
||
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net |
|
7,225 |
|
5,063 |
|
43 |
|
||
Retained earnings |
|
208,939 |
|
179,590 |
|
16 |
|
||
Total stockholders equity |
|
279,125 |
|
246,011 |
|
13 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
2,665,084 |
|
$ |
2,453,114 |
|
9 |
|
See Accompanying Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
CATHAY BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
||||||||
(In thousands, except share and per share data) |
|
2002 |
|
2001 |
|
2002 |
|
2001 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
INTEREST INCOME |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Interest on loans |
|
$ |
27,384 |
|
$ |
30,045 |
|
$ |
79,980 |
|
$ |
93,156 |
|
Interest on securities available-for-sale |
|
3,499 |
|
3,597 |
|
11,553 |
|
10,345 |
|
||||
Interest on securities held-to-maturity |
|
5,149 |
|
5,974 |
|
15,621 |
|
18,019 |
|
||||
Interest on federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell |
|
265 |
|
344 |
|
657 |
|
1,180 |
|
||||
Interest on deposits with banks |
|
7 |
|
17 |
|
26 |
|
44 |
|
||||
Total interest income |
|
36,304 |
|
39,977 |
|
107,837 |
|
122,744 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
INTEREST EXPENSE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Time deposits of $100 or more |
|
5,817 |
|
9,513 |
|
17,847 |
|
31,847 |
|
||||
Other deposits |
|
3,432 |
|
5,826 |
|
10,366 |
|
19,438 |
|
||||
Other borrowed funds |
|
813 |
|
626 |
|
2,367 |
|
1,747 |
|
||||
Total interest expense |
|
10,062 |
|
15,965 |
|
30,580 |
|
53,032 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net interest income before provision for loan losses |
|
26,242 |
|
24,012 |
|
77,257 |
|
69,712 |
|
||||
Provision for loan losses |
|
1,500 |
|
1,200 |
|
4,500 |
|
3,600 |
|
||||
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
|
24,742 |
|
22,812 |
|
72,757 |
|
66,112 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
NON-INTEREST INCOME |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Securities gains |
|
1,421 |
|
1,063 |
|
1,881 |
|
1,889 |
|
||||
Letters of credit commissions |
|
533 |
|
530 |
|
1,471 |
|
1,645 |
|
||||
Depository service fees |
|
1,330 |
|
1,209 |
|
4,291 |
|
3,624 |
|
||||
Other operating income |
|
1,901 |
|
1,352 |
|
4,898 |
|
3,900 |
|
||||
Total non-interest income |
|
5,185 |
|
4,154 |
|
12,541 |
|
11,058 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
NON-INTEREST EXPENSE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Salaries and employee benefits |
|
6,374 |
|
5,808 |
|
18,787 |
|
17,315 |
|
||||
Occupancy expense |
|
1,009 |
|
844 |
|
2,757 |
|
2,548 |
|
||||
Computer and equipment expense |
|
808 |
|
698 |
|
2,392 |
|
2,068 |
|
||||
Professional services expense |
|
1,003 |
|
1,202 |
|
2,857 |
|
3,884 |
|
||||
FDIC and State assessments |
|
127 |
|
121 |
|
373 |
|
353 |
|
||||
Marketing expense |
|
357 |
|
667 |
|
1,128 |
|
1,250 |
|
||||
Other real estate owned (income) |
|
|
|
(284 |
) |
(385 |
) |
(467 |
) |
||||
Operations of investments in real estate |
|
415 |
|
327 |
|
1,533 |
|
1,568 |
|
||||
Other operating expense |
|
798 |
|
870 |
|
2,315 |
|
3,185 |
|
||||
Total non-interest expense |
|
10,891 |
|
10,253 |
|
31,757 |
|
31,704 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Income before income tax expense |
|
19,036 |
|
16,713 |
|
53,541 |
|
45,466 |
|
||||
Income tax expense |
|
6,031 |
|
5,208 |
|
16,910 |
|
14,383 |
|
||||
Net income |
|
13,005 |
|
11,505 |
|
36,631 |
|
31,083 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Other comprehensive income, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Unrealized holding gains arising during the period |
|
1,939 |
|
2,625 |
|
3,133 |
|
3,634 |
|
||||
Cumulative adjustment upon adoption of SFAS 133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
566 |
|
||||
Unrealized gains on cash flow hedge derivative |
|
417 |
|
511 |
|
491 |
|
619 |
|
||||
Less: reclassification adjustment included in net income |
|
550 |
|
711 |
|
1,462 |
|
805 |
|
||||
Total other comprehensive income, net of tax |
|
1,806 |
|
2,425 |
|
2,162 |
|
4,014 |
|
||||
Total comprehensive income |
|
$ |
14,811 |
|
$ |
13,930 |
|
$ |
38,793 |
|
$ |
35,097 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net income per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Basic |
|
$ |
0.72 |
|
$ |
0.63 |
|
$ |
2.04 |
|
$ |
1.71 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.72 |
|
$ |
0.63 |
|
$ |
2.02 |
|
$ |
1.71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Cash dividends paid per common share |
|
$ |
0.140 |
|
$ |
0 .125 |
|
$ |
0.405 |
|
$ |
0.375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Basic average common shares outstanding |
|
18,005,262 |
|
18,127,476 |
|
17,989,066 |
|
18,159,046 |
|
||||
Diluted average common shares outstanding |
|
18,133,446 |
|
18,180,220 |
|
18,113,054 |
|
18,215,266 |
|
See Accompanying Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
CATHAY BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
|
For the nine months ended September 30, |
|
||||
(In thousands) |
|
2002 |
|
2001 |
|
||
Cash Flows from Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net income |
|
$ |
36,631 |
|
$ |
31,083 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Provision for loan losses |
|
4,500 |
|
3,600 |
|
||
Depreciation |
|
1,185 |
|
1,094 |
|
||
Gain on sales of other real estate owned |
|
(395 |
) |
(153 |
) |
||
Gain on sale of loans |
|
(351 |
) |
|
|
||
Gain on sale and call of investment securities |
|
(1,881 |
) |
(1,889 |
) |
||
Amortization of investment security premium, net |
|
509 |
|
343 |
|
||
Amortization of goodwill |
|
|
|
648 |
|
||
Increase (decrease) in deferred loan fees, net |
|
325 |
|
(188 |
) |
||
Decrease in accrued interest receivable |
|
2,112 |
|
689 |
|
||
Decrease in other assets, net |
|
49 |
|
2,492 |
|
||
Increase in other liabilities |
|
2,020 |
|
5,406 |
|
||
Total adjustments |
|
8,073 |
|
12,042 |
|
||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
44,704 |
|
43,125 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash Flows from Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Purchase of investment securities available-for-sale |
|
(187,271 |
) |
(744,416 |
) |
||
Proceeds from maturity and call of investment securities available-for-sale |
|
164,066 |
|
667,283 |
|
||
Proceeds from sale of investment securities available-for-sale |
|
20,143 |
|
22,179 |
|
||
Proceeds from repayment of mortgage-backed securities available-for-sale |
|
3,636 |
|
7,218 |
|
||
Purchase of investment securities held-to-maturity |
|
(34,003 |
) |
(80,781 |
) |
||
Proceeds from maturity and call of investment securities held-to-maturity |
|
12,420 |
|
46,930 |
|
||
Purchase of mortgage-backed securities held-to-maturity |
|
(38,843 |
) |
(27,657 |
) |
||
Proceeds from repayment of mortgage-backed securities held-to-maturity |
|
44,840 |
|
43,466 |
|
||
Proceeds from sale of loans |
|
13,568 |
|
|
|
||
Net increase in loans |
|
(203,557 |
) |
(176,392 |
) |
||
Purchase of premises and equipment |
|
(1,778 |
) |
(772 |
) |
||
Proceeds from sale of other real estate owned |
|
1,704 |
|
1,372 |
|
||
Net increase in investments in real estate |
|
(4,333 |
) |
(1,068 |
) |
||
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
(209,408 |
) |
(242,638 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash Flows from Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net increase in demand deposits, NOW deposits, money market and savings deposits |
|
101,064 |
|
41,913 |
|
||
Net increase in time deposits |
|
52,065 |
|
158,180 |
|
||
Net increase (decrease) in federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
6,386 |
|
(44,465 |
) |
||
Increase in advances from Federal Home Loan Board |
|
20,000 |
|
20,000 |
|
||
Cash dividends |
|
(7,281 |
) |
(6,813 |
) |
||
Proceeds from shares issued to the Dividend Reinvestment Plan |
|
1,431 |
|
1,386 |
|
||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
433 |
|
396 |
|
||
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
(262 |
) |
(6,450 |
) |
||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
173,836 |
|
164,147 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
9,132 |
|
(35,366 |
) |
||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of the period |
|
86,514 |
|
84,687 |
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of the period |
|
$ |
95,646 |
|
$ |
49,321 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Supplemental disclosure of cash flows information |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash paid during the period: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Interest |
|
$ |
31,311 |
|
$ |
54,621 |
|
Income taxes |
|
$ |
16,889 |
|
$ |
4,729 |
|
Non-cash investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Transfers to investment securities available-for-sale within 90 days of maturity |
|
$ |
10,864 |
|
$ |
6,730 |
|
Net change in unrealized holding gains on securities available-for-sale, net of tax |
|
$ |
1,670 |
|
$ |
2,829 |
|
Cumulative adjustment upon adoption of SFAS No. 133, net of tax |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
566 |
|
Net change in unrealized gains on cash flow hedge derivatives, net of tax |
|
$ |
492 |
|
$ |
619 |
|
Transfers to other real estate owned |
|
$ |
407 |
|
$ |
660 |
|
See Accompanying Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
6
CATHAY BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(Unaudited)
Cathay Bancorp, Inc. (the Bancorp) is the one-bank holding company for Cathay Bank (the Bank and together the Company or we, us, or our). The Bank was founded in 1962 and offers a wide range of financial services. The Bank now operates twelve branches in Southern California, eight branches in Northern California, three branches in New York State, one branch in Houston, Texas, and a representative office in Hong Kong, and in Shanghai, China. In addition, the Banks subsidiary, Cathay Investment Company, maintains an office in Taiwan. The Bank is a commercial bank, servicing primarily individuals, professionals, and small to medium-sized businesses in the local markets in which its branches are located.
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2002. Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior years financial statements to conform to the September 30, 2002 presentation. For further information, refer to the audited consolidated financial statements and footnotes included in the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.
Effective January 1, 2002, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. SFAS No. 142 requires that goodwill no longer be amortized to earnings, but instead be reviewed for impairment. Upon adoption of SFAS No. 142, the Company was required to reassess the useful lives and residual values of all intangible assets acquired in purchase business combinations, and make any necessary amortization period adjustments by the end of the first interim period. In addition, to the extent an intangible asset is identified as having an indefinite useful life, the Company was required to test the intangible asset for impairment in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 142. Any impairment loss is measured as of the date of adoption and recognized as the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle in the first interim period. The Company adopted SFAS No. 142 effective January 1, 2002. Upon adoption, the Company discontinued the amortization of goodwill, and reclassified $2.33 million from goodwill to core deposit intangible, which is classified under other assets in the Statements of Financial Condition. The Company also reassessed the useful lives and residual value of all intangible assets acquired in purchase business combinations, and tested goodwill for impairment, and found no impairment.
7
In August 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. For long-lived assets to be held and used, SFAS No. 144 retains the requirements of SFAS No. 121 to (a) recognize an impairment loss only if the carrying amount of a long-lived asset is not recoverable from its undiscounted cash flows and (b) measure an impairment loss as the difference between the carrying amount and fair value. Further, SFAS No. 144 eliminates the requirement to allocate goodwill to long-lived assets to be tested for impairment, describes a probability-weighted cash flow estimation approach to deal with situations in which alternative courses of action to recover the carrying amount of a long-lived asset are under consideration or a range is estimated for the amount of possible future cash flows, and establishes a primary-asset approach to determine the cash flow estimation period. For long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale, SFAS No. 144 retains the requirements of SFAS No. 121 to measure a long-lived asset classified as held-for-sale at the lower of its carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell and to cease depreciation. Discontinued operations would no longer be measured on a net realizable value basis, and future operating losses would be no longer recognized before they occur. SFAS No. 144 broadens the presentation of discontinued operations to include a component of an entity, establishes criteria to determine when a long-lived asset is held-for-sale, prohibits retroactive reclassification of the asset as held-for-sale at the balance sheet date if the criteria are met after the balance sheet date but before issuance of the financial statements, and provides accounting guidance for the reclassification of an asset from held-for-sale to held-and-used. The provisions of SFAS No. 144 are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001. The Company adopted SFAS No. 144 effective January 1, 2002. Adoption of SFAS No. 144 did not have any impact on the results of operations or financial condition of the Company.
In April 2002, FASB issued SFAS No. 145, Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44 and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections. SFAS No. 145 rescinds SFAS No. 4 that required all gains and losses from extinguishment of debt to be aggregated and, if material, classified as an extraordinary item, net of related income tax effect. Henceforth, those gains and losses from extinguishment of debt are to be classified in accordance with the criteria in APB Opinion No. 30, Reporting the Results of Operations Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions. SFAS No. 64, which amended SFAS No. 4, is no longer necessary with the rescission of SFAS No. 4. SFAS No. 44 was issued to establish accounting requirements for the effects of transition to the provisions of the Motor Carrier Act of 1980. Since the transition has been completed, SFAS No. 44 is no longer necessary. SFAS No. 145 amends SFAS No. 13 to require that certain lease modifications that have economic effects similar to sale-leaseback transactions to be accounted for in the same manner as sale-leaseback transactions. SFAS No. 145 is effective for financial statements for periods beginning after May 15, 2002, and earlier adoption is recommended. Upon adoption, the Company is required to reclassify prior period items that do not meet the extraordinary classification criteria in APB 30. The Company adopted SFAS No. 145 effective May 15, 2002. Adoption of SFAS No. 145 did not have any impact on the results of operations or financial condition of the Company.
In July 2002, FASB issued SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities. SFAS No. 146 applies to costs associated with an exit activity (including restructuring) or with a disposal of long-lived assets. Those activities can include eliminating or reducing product lines, terminating employees and contracts, and relocating plant facilities or personnel. Under SFAS No. 146, a company will record a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity when that liability is incurred and can be measured at fair value. A liability is incurred when an event leaves the company little or no discretion to avoid transferring or using the assets in the future. Previous accounting guidance was provided by the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 94-3,
8
Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring). SFAS No. 146 is effective for exit or disposal activities that are initiated after December 31, 2002, with early application encouraged. The Company expects that adoption of SFAS No. 146 will not have a material impact on the Companys results of operations or financial condition.
In October 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 147, Acquisitions of Certain Financial Institutions. SFAS No. 147 is an amendment of FASB statements No. 72 and 144 and FASB Interpretation No. 9. The Statement addresses the financial accounting and reporting for the acquisition of all or part of a financial institution. It also provides guidance on the accounting for the impairment or disposal of acquired long-term customer relationship intangible assets. The provisions in paragraph 5 of this Statement shall be effective for acquisitions for which the date of acquisition is on or after October 1, 2002. Other provisions are effective October 1, 2002, some of which permit earlier application. The adoption of this statement has no impact on the Company.
The Company enters into financial derivatives in order to seek mitigation of exposure to interest rate risks related to its interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. For periods prior to January 1, 2001, for those qualifying financial derivatives that altered the interest rate characteristics of assets or liabilities, the net differential to be paid or received on the financial derivative was treated as an adjustment to the yield on the underlying assets or liabilities. Interest rate financial derivatives that did not qualify for the accrual method were recorded at fair value, with gains and losses recorded in earnings.
Effective January 1, 2001, the Company adopted SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended by SFAS No. 137 and No. 138. SFAS No. 133 establishes accounting and reporting standards for financial derivatives, including certain financial derivatives embedded in other contracts, and hedging activities. It requires the recognition of all financial derivatives as assets or liabilities in the Companys statement of financial condition and measurement of those financial derivatives at fair value. The accounting treatment of changes in fair value is dependent upon whether or not a financial derivative is designated as a hedge and if so, the type of hedge.
Upon adoption of SFAS No. 133, the Company recognizes all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. Fair value is based on dealer quotes, or quoted prices from instruments with similar characteristics. The Company uses financial derivatives designated for hedging activities as cash flow hedges. For derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, changes in fair value are recognized in other comprehensive income until the hedged item is recognized in earnings.
On March 21, 2000, the Company hedged a portion of its floating interest rate loans through an interest rate swap agreement with a $20.00 million notional amount. The purpose of the hedge is to provide a measure of stability in the future cash receipts from such loans over the term of the swap agreement, which at September 30, 2002 was less than two and one half years. Amounts to be paid or received on the interest rate swap will be reclassified into earnings upon the receipt of interest payments on the underlying hedged loans, including amounts totaling $790,000 that were reclassified into earnings during the nine months ended September 30, 2002. The estimated net amount of the existing gains within accumulated other comprehensive income that are expected to be reclassified into earnings within the next 12 months is approximately $1.07 million.
9
Basic earnings per share excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock and resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in earnings. All share and per share amounts included herein have been adjusted for the two-for-one stock split payable on May 9, 2002, to stockholders of record on April 19, 2002.
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002, all outstanding options had a dilutive effect and were included in the computation of diluted earnings per share. Options to purchase an additional 52,421 shares of common stock were outstanding for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2001, but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because their inclusion would have had an antidilutive effect.
The following table sets forth basic and diluted earnings per share calculations:
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
||||||||
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data) |
|
2002 |
|
2001 |
|
2002 |
|
2001 |
|
||||
Net income |
|
$ |
13,005 |
|
$ |
11,505 |
|
$ |
36,631 |
|
$ |
31,083 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Weighted-average shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Basic weighted-average number of common shares outstanding |
|
18,005,262 |
|
18,127,476 |
|
17,989,066 |
|
18,159,046 |
|
||||
Dilutive effect of weighted-average outstanding common shares equivalents |
|
128,184 |
|
52,744 |
|
123,988 |
|
56,220 |
|
||||
Diluted weighted-average number of common shares outstanding |
|
18,133,446 |
|
18,180,220 |
|
18,113,054 |
|
18,215,266 |
|
||||
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Basic |
|
$ |
0.72 |
|
$ |
0.63 |
|
$ |
2.04 |
|
$ |
1.71 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.72 |
|
$ |
0.63 |
|
$ |
2.02 |
|
$ |
1.71 |
|
10
The following discussion is given based on the assumption that the reader has access to and read the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001, of Cathay Bancorp, Inc. (Bancorp) and its wholly-owned subsidiary Cathay Bank (the Bank and together the Company or we, us, or our).
The following discussion and other sections of this report include forward-looking statements regarding managements beliefs, projections, and assumptions concerning future results and events. These forward-looking statements may, but do not necessarily, also include words such as may, will, should, could, expects, plans, intends, anticipates, believes, estimates, predicts, potential, or continue, or the negative of such terms and other comparable terminology or similar expressions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees. They involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance, or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance, or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, among other things, adverse developments, or conditions related to or arising from:
Our expansion into new market areas.
Fluctuations in interest rates.
Demographic changes.
Increases in competition.
Deterioration in asset or credit quality.
Changes in the availability of capital.
Adverse regulatory developments.
Changes in business strategy or development plans, including plans regarding the registered investment company.
General economic or business conditions in California and other regions where the Bank has operations such as the currently unknown impact of the recent West Coast port closures.
War and terrorism; and
Other factors discussed in the section entitled Factors that May Affect Future Results in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.
Actual results in any future period may also vary from the past results discussed in this report. Given these risks and uncertainties, we caution readers not to place undue reliance in any forward-looking statements, which speak as of the date of the report. We have no intention and undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement or to publicly announce the results of any revision of any forward-looking statement to reflect future developments or events.
Cathay Banks web page is found at http://www.cathaybank.com/
11
Return on average stockholders equity (ROE) was 18.94% and return on average assets (ROA) was 1.96% for the quarter ended September 30, 2002.
Loan production grew by 7.30% or $124.24 million in the 3rd quarter, while core deposits grew by 5.10% or $63.61 million, and total deposits grew by 3.12% or $68.83 million.
Diluted earnings per share increased 14.29% to $0.72 compared to earnings per share of $0.63 a year ago.
3rd quarter 2002 net income increased 13.04% to $13.01 million compared to $11.51 million during the same quarter a year ago.
The efficiency ratio improved to 34.65% from 36.40% a year ago.
An increase of 24.82% in non-interest income, which totaled $5.19 million compared to $4.15 million in the year ago quarter.
Non-performing assets (NPAs) dropped to $11.78 million from $19.50 million in the 3rd quarter 2001.
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 11.81%, total risk-based capital ratio of 12.86%, and Tier 1 leverage capital ratio of 10.01%.
Sacramento Branch opened for business on September 9, 2002.
September 27th marked the grand opening ceremony of the Brooklyn Branch, which opened for business on June 27, and which became our third branch in the New York area.
Net Income
Consolidated net income of $13.01 million for the third quarter of 2002, was up 13.04% from third quarter 2001 net income of $11.51 million. On an earnings-per-share basis, third quarter 2002 net income was $0.72 per diluted share, an increase of 14.29%, over the $0.63 per diluted share one year ago.
Pretax income
For the third quarter 2002 our pretax income increased by $2.32 million to $19.04 million, up 13.90%, from the corresponding quarter of last year. The increase to pretax income was the net result of the following changes in income and expenses:
An increase of $2.23 million in net interest income before provision for loan losses.
An increase in the provision for loan losses of $300,000.
An increase of $1.03 million or 24.82% in non-interest income.
An increase of $638,000 or 6.22% in non-interest expense.
Net Interest Income Before Provision for Loan Losses
During the third quarter 2002, our net interest income increased by $2.23 million over the comparable quarter of a year ago, reflecting a $35.74 million growth in the excess of average interest-earning assets over average deposits and other borrowings. Net interest income for the third quarter 2002 was $26.24 million compared to $24.01 million during the third quarter 2001.
The increase in average interest-earning assets from last years third quarter reflected the growth in average gross loans totaling $216.61 million. This increase was funded primarily by increases in
12
average deposits and other borrowings totaling $203.36 million. The overall change to interest income and interest expense related to volume resulted in $2.99 million of additional net interest income.
As a result of the ongoing slow economic recovery, interest rates have remained relatively flat during 2002, in contrast to the declining interest rate environment we experienced throughout 2001. A year ago, the Federal Open Market Committee target Fed funds rate was 3.00% compared to 1.75% for the first nine months of 2002. This lower interest rate environment generated lower interest income and interest expense from changes in interest rate. The overall change to interest income and interest expense related to changes in interest rates resulted in a decrease of $755,000 to net interest income from last years third quarter. Also see Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk on this 3rd Quarter 2002 report on Form 10-Q for a discussion of the impact to the net interest income of the Bank due to the November 7, 2002, decision by the Federal Open Market Committee to lower its federal funds interest rate by 50 basis points.
Our net interest margin for the third quarter equaled 4.24% compared to 4.30% a year ago, and 4.31% for the second quarter 2002. The interest rate earned on our interest-earning assets was 5.86% during the third quarter 2002 compared to 7.15% during the third quarter a year ago, and our average cost of funds on deposits and other borrowed funds equaled 1.72% for the third quarter 2002 compared to 2.99% during the third quarter 2001.
Net Interest Income Taxable-Equivalent Basis
The following table reflects changes, on a taxable-equivalent basis, on net interest income and margin resulting from the interaction between the volume and composition of earning assets, related yields, and associated funding costs. Portfolio size, composition, and yields earned and funding costs can have a significant impact on net interest income and margin. Average daily balances, together with the total dollar amounts, on a taxable-equivalent basis, of interest income, and interest expense and the weighted-average interest rate and net interest margin were as follows:
Three months ended September 30, |
|
2002 |
|
2001 |
|
||||||||||||
Taxable-equivalent basis |
|
Average |
|
Interest |
|
Average |
|
Average |
|
Interest |
|
Average |
|
||||
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Interest-earning assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell |
|
$ |
60,457 |
|
$ |
265 |
|
1.74 |
% |
$ |
37,647 |
|
$ |
344 |
|
3.63 |
% |
Securities available-for-sale |
|
263,623 |
|
3,585 |
|
5.40 |
|
228,811 |
|
3,719 |
|
6.45 |
|
||||
Securities held-to-maturity |
|
366,355 |
|
5,596 |
|
6.06 |
|
400,280 |
|
6,393 |
|
6.34 |
|
||||
Loans receivable, net |
|
1,764,910 |
|
27,384 |
|
6.16 |
|
1,546,776 |
|
30,045 |
|
7.71 |
|
||||
Deposits with banks |
|
840 |
|
7 |
|
3.31 |
|
3,571 |
|
17 |
|
1.89 |
|
||||
Total interest-earning assets |
|
$ |
2,456,185 |
|
$ |
36,837 |
|
5.95 |
% |
$ |
2,217,085 |
|
$ |
40,518 |
|
7.25 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Interest-bearing checking deposits |
|
$ |
305,603 |
|
$ |
557 |
|
0.72 |
% |
$ |
259,846 |
|
$ |
745 |
|
1.14 |
% |
Savings deposit |
|
274,913 |
|
379 |
|
0.55 |
|
244,653 |
|
563 |
|
0.91 |
|
||||
Time deposits |
|
1,382,875 |
|
8,313 |
|
2.38 |
|
1,315,816 |
|
14,031 |
|
4.23 |
|
||||
Total interest-bearing deposits |
|
1,963,391 |
|
9,249 |
|
1.87 |
|
1,820,315 |
|
15,339 |
|
3.34 |
|
||||
Other borrowed funds |
|
78,512 |
|
813 |
|
4.11 |
|
60,747 |
|
626 |
|
4.09 |
|
||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
2,041,903 |
|
10,062 |
|
1.96 |
|
1,881,062 |
|
15,965 |
|
3.37 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Non-interest-bearing demand deposits |
|
279,454 |
|
|
|
|
|
236,939 |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Total deposits and other borrowed funds |
|
$ |
2,321,357 |
|
$ |
10,062 |
|
1.72 |
% |
$ |
2,118,001 |
|
$ |
15,965 |
|
2.99 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Interest rate spread |
|
|
|
|
|
4.23 |
% |
|
|
|
|
4.26 |
% |
||||
Net interest income/margin |
|
|
|
$ |
26,775 |
|
4.32 |
% |
|
|
$ |
24,553 |
|
4.39 |
% |
13
Net interest income on a taxable-equivalent basis was $26.78 million in the third quarter of 2002 compared with $25.96 million in the second quarter of 2002 and $24.55 million in the third quarter of 2001. The increase of $2.22 million in the net taxable-equivalent interest income before provision for loan losses from last years third quarter was primarily the result of a net increase of $35.74 million in average interest-earning assets over average deposits and other borrowed funds.
Our taxable-equivalent net interest margin was 4.32% in the third quarter of 2002, compared with 4.40% in the second quarter of 2002 and 4.39% one year ago.
Provision for Loan Losses
The provision for loan losses represents the charge against current earnings that is determined by management, through a disciplined credit review process, as the amount needed to maintain an allowance that is sufficient to absorb loan losses inherent in the Companys loan portfolio. In view of the still uncertain economic picture, and the additional inherent risk resulting from the overall increase of our loan portfolio, we increased the provision for loan losses by $300,000 to $1.50 million in the third quarter of 2002 compared to $1.20 million for the third quarter of 2001. Also see Allowance for Loan Losses on this 3rd Quarter 2002 report on Form 10-Q.
Non-Interest Income
Non-interest income was $5.19 million for the third quarter of 2002, an increase of $1.03 million or 24.82%, when compared with $4.15 million during the same quarter a year ago.
During the third quarter 2002, we sold $15.00 million of securities available-for-sale, resulting in securities gains totaling $1.42 million. The comparable numbers for the year ago quarter were securities gains of $1.06 million and no write-downs during the quarter. The proceeds from sales were used to fund our increasing loan demand during the third quarter 2002, and to take advantage of the current interest rate environment.
Reflecting our higher customer volumes and an increase in the number of transaction accounts, our depository service fees for the third quarter 2002 increased 10.01% to $1.33 million, compared to $1.21 million during the like period a year ago. Letters of credit commissions were relatively flat at $533,000, most likely as a result of a continuing uncertainty over the outlook for the U.S. economy from the point of view of some of our importing customers.
Other operating income increased by $549,000, up 40.61%, to $1.90 million compared to $1.35 million in the year ago quarter. The increase in other operating income was primarily due to increases in wire transfer fees, loan related fees, gain on sale of SBA loans, foreign exchange fees, and an increase in safe deposit fees primarily related to our new branch in Brooklyn, New York.
Non-Interest Expense
Non-interest expense increased $638,000, or 6.22%, to $10.89 million in the third quarter of 2002, and our efficiency ratio improved to 34.65% compared to 36.40% in the year ago quarter.
Annual salary adjustments, additional employees and salary expense for our new branches in Union City California, which opened for business on October 5, 2001, Brooklyn - New York, Sacramento - California, and our new representative office in Shanghai - China drove the increase of $566,000 in salaries and employee benefits in the third quarter 2002. Also, as a result of these three new branches and the new representative office, our occupancy, and computer and equipment expense increased by
14
$275,000. Marketing expense, which includes charitable donations and contributions made by the Company, was down $310,000, primarily because the prior years third quarter included a $250,000 contribution towards relief efforts in response to the tragic events of September 11. In addition, the quarterly goodwill amortization of $165,000 was discontinued upon the adoption of SFAS No. 142 on January 1, 2002.
Income taxes
The provision for income taxes was $6.03 million or an effective income tax rate of 31.68% for the third quarter 2002 compared with $5.21 million or an effective income tax rate of 31.16% in the year ago quarter. The effective income tax rate during both quarters reflects the income tax benefits of a registered investment company subsidiary of the Bank, which provides flexibility to raise additional capital in a tax efficient manner, and tax credits earned from qualified low income housing investments. The long-term plan for the registered investment company continues to be under review and may result in a decision to deregister this subsidiary in the near future. Depending on the results of the review and other factors, the effective tax rate for 2002 may increase. There can be no assurance that the subsidiary will continue as a registered investment company, or that any tax benefits will continue, or as to our ability to raise capital through this subsidiary. A proposed change to California tax law introduced on February 21, 2002, related to registered investment companies that could have negatively impacted the Companys effective tax rate in future periods, was withdrawn on April 3, 2002. However, there can be no assurance that a similar bill will not be introduced at a future time, or that any tax benefits will continue.
YEAR-TO-DATE REVIEW CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENT
The first nine months of this year saw a 17.85% increase in our net income to $36.63 million compared to $31.08 million over the same period a year ago. Our earnings per diluted share for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, increased by 18.13% to $2.02 over the $1.71 per diluted share for the same period a year ago.
This earnings performance produced a return on average stockholders equity of 18.81% and a return on average assets of 1.91% for the nine months of 2002 compared to a return on average stockholders equity of 18.29% and a return on average assets of 1.81%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2001. The net interest margin for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, decreased 5 basis points to 4.33% compared to 4.38% during the like period a year ago. On a taxable-equivalent basis, the net interest margin equaled 4.46% compared to 4.47% a year ago.
Non-interest income was up 13.41% to $12.54 million for the first nine months of 2002, compared to $11.06 million in the like period a year ago. The increase in 2002 was primarily attributable to increases in depository services fees and other operating income.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2002, non-interest expense was relatively flat. Total non-interest expense during 2002 equaled $31.76 million compared to $31.70 million during the same period a year ago. The increase in non-interest income coupled with a relatively flat non-interest expense during 2002 drove the decrease in the efficiency ratio for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, to 35.36% compared to 39.25% during the same period a year ago.
15
Assets
Total assets were $2.67 billion at September 30, 2002, up 8.64% from year-end 2001 of $2.45 billion, primarily reflecting the growth in commercial mortgage loans and commercial loans. Our investment securities portfolio increased 3.09% to $642.58 million at September 30, 2002, up $19.27 million, from the $623.31 million at December 31, 2001. As a percentage of total assets, the investment securities portfolio decreased to 24.11% compared to 25.41% at year-end 2001. Cash and cash equivalents increased by $9.13 million from December 31, 2001.
Securities
Securities available-for-sale represented 11.76% of average interest-earning assets for the first nine months of 2002 compared with 9.93% for the first nine months of 2001. The fair value of securities available-for-sale (AFS) at September 30, 2002 was $264.04 million compared to $248.96 million at December 31, 2001. This increase of $15.08 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, represented primarily purchases of US Government agency securities. During the first nine months of 2002, the Bank sold AFS securities with a net book value of $20.14 million. This AFS securities sales resulted in gains of $1.89 million, exclusive of gains on calls of securities of $233,000 and $245,000 in write-downs on available-for-sale venture capital investments. The gain on sale from AFS securities was related to the sale of US Government agency notes and corporate bonds.
Market expectations of a decrease to a no change in the federal funds interest rate by the Federal Reserve, flattened the yield curve during the third quarter 2002 from the steeper levels during the first quarter 2002, and as a result the net unrealized gain on securities available-for-sale, which represented the difference between fair value and amortized cost, increased to $10.12 million compared to a net unrealized gain of $2.88 million at March 31, 2002, and $7.17 million at year-end 2001. Net unrealized gains and losses in the securities available-for-sale are included in accumulated other comprehensive income or loss, net of tax.
Securities held-to-maturity represented 15.34% of average interest-earning assets for the first nine months of 2002 compared with 18.69% for the first nine months of 2001. Securities held-to-maturity at September 30, 2002 increased $4.19 million to $378.54 million compared to $374.36 million at December 31, 2001. The increase in securities held-to-maturity during the first nine months of 2002 was primarily the result of purchases of collateralized mortgage obligations, partially offset by calls and maturities of securities held-to-maturity.
The average taxable-equivalent yield on investment securities decreased 60 basis points to 5.95% for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, compared with 6.55% for the same period in 2001. For the three months ended September 30, 2002, the average taxable-equivalent yield on investment securities decreased 60 basis points to 5.78% compared with 6.38% for the same period in 2001.
16
The following tables summarize the composition, amortized cost, gross unrealized gains, gross unrealized losses, and fair values of securities available-for-sale, as of September 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001:
|
|
September 30, 2002 |
|
||||||||||
(In thousands) |
|
Amortized Cost |
|
Gross Unrealized Gains |
|
Gross Unrealized Losses |
|
Fair Value |
|
||||
US government agencies |
|
$ |
176,435 |
|
$ |
7,912 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
184,347 |
|
State and municipal securities |
|
380 |
|
3 |
|
|
|
383 |
|
||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
6,430 |
|
366 |
|
|
|
6,796 |
|
||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
931 |
|
41 |
|
|
|
972 |
|
||||
Asset-backed securities |
|
9,996 |
|
566 |
|
|
|
10,562 |
|
||||
Corporate bonds |
|
30,771 |
|
2,451 |
|
|
|
33,222 |
|
||||
Equity securities |
|
28,975 |
|
|
|
1,219 |
|
27,756 |
|
||||
Total |
|
$ |
253,918 |
|
$ |
11,339 |
|
$ |
1,219 |
|
$ |
264,038 |
|
|
|
December 31, 2001 |
|
||||||||||
(In thousands) |
|
Amortized Cost |
|
Gross Unrealized Gains |
|
Gross Unrealized Losses |
|
Fair Value |
|
||||
US government agencies |
|
$ |
113,873 |
|
$ |
4,500 |
|
$ |
49 |
|
$ |
118,324 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
8,336 |
|
213 |
|
6 |
|
8,543 |
|
||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
2,658 |
|
47 |
|
|
|
2,705 |
|
||||
Asset-backed securities |
|
9,994 |
|
401 |
|
|
|
10,395 |
|
||||
Money market fund |
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
||||
Corporate bonds |
|
57,973 |
|
2,532 |
|
171 |
|
60,334 |
|
||||
Equity securities |
|
28,954 |
|
34 |
|
331 |
|
28,657 |
|
||||
Total |
|
$ |
241,788 |
|
$ |
7,727 |
|
$ |
557 |
|
$ |
248,958 |
|
The following tables summarize the composition, carrying value, gross unrealized gains, gross unrealized losses and estimated fair values of securities held-to-maturity, as of September 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001:
|
|
September 30, 2002 |
|
||||||||||
(In thousands) |
|
Carrying Value |
|
Gross Unrealized Gains |
|
Gross Unrealized Losses |
|
Estimated |
|
||||
US government agencies |
|
$ |
49,995 |
|
$ |
2,208 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
52,203 |
|
State and municipal securities |
|
71,565 |
|
5,918 |
|
3 |
|
77,480 |
|
||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
79,190 |
|
3,304 |
|
8 |
|
82,486 |
|
||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
75,190 |
|
1,194 |
|
13 |
|
76,371 |
|
||||
Asset-backed securities |
|
9,999 |
|
345 |
|
|
|
10,344 |
|
||||
Corporate bonds |
|
72,723 |
|
4,263 |
|
572 |
|
76,414 |
|
||||
Other securities |
|
19,881 |
|
1,653 |
|
|
|
21,534 |
|
||||
Total |
|
$ |
378,543 |
|
$ |
18,885 |
|
$ |
596 |
|
$ |
396,832 |
|
|
|
December 31, 2001 |
|
||||||||||
(In thousands) |
|
Carrying Value |
|
Gross Unrealized Gains |
|
Gross Unrealized Losses |
|
Estimated |
|
||||
US government agencies |
|
$ |
50,017 |
|
$ |
1,251 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
51,268 |
|
State and municipal securities |
|
69,906 |
|
2,049 |
|
380 |
|
71,575 |
|
||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
110,342 |
|
2,726 |
|
14 |
|
113,054 |
|
||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
50,282 |
|
657 |
|
57 |
|
50,882 |
|
||||
Asset-backed securities |
|
920 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
921 |
|
||||
Corporate bonds |
|
73,031 |
|
1,822 |
|
81 |
|
74,772 |
|
||||
Other securities |
|
19,858 |
|
484 |
|
|
|
20,342 |
|
||||
Total |
|
$ |
374,356 |
|
$ |
8,990 |
|
$ |
532 |
|
$ |
382,814 |
|
17
The following tables summarize the scheduled maturities by security type of securities available-for-sale, as of September 30, 2002.
|
|
As of September 30, 2002 |
|
|||||||||||||
(In thousands) |
|
One Year or Less |
|
After One Year to |
|
After Five Years |
|
Over Ten Years |
|
Total |
|
|||||
US government agencies |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
164,321 |
|
$ |
20,026 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
184,347 |
|
State and municipal securities |
|
383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
383 |
|
|||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
|
131 |
|
1,091 |
|
5,574 |
|
6,796 |
|
|||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
|
|
972 |
|
|
|
|
|
972 |
|
|||||
Asset-backed securities |
|
|
|
10,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
10,562 |
|
|||||
Corporate bonds |
|
10,340 |
|
16,940 |
|
5,942 |
|
|
|
33,222 |
|
|||||
Equity securities |
|
27,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,756 |
|
|||||
Total |
|
$ |
38,479 |
|
$ |
192,926 |
|
$ |
27,059 |
|
$ |
5,574 |
|
$ |
264,038 |
|
The following tables summarize the scheduled maturities by security type of securities held-to-maturity, as of September 30, 2002.
|
|
As of September 30, 2002 |
|
|||||||||||||
(In thousands) |
|
One Year or Less |
|
After One Year to |
|
After Five Years |
|
Over Ten Years |
|
Total |
|
|||||
US government agencies |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
49,995 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
49,995 |
|
State and municipal securities |
|
825 |
|
11,058 |
|
25,127 |
|
34,555 |
|
71,565 |
|
|||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
|
8,046 |
|
45,139 |
|
26,005 |
|
79,190 |
|
|||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
|
|
2,551 |
|
49,801 |
|
22,838 |
|
75,190 |
|
|||||
Asset-backed securities |
|
|
|
9,999 |
|
|
|
|
|
9,999 |
|
|||||
Corporate bonds |
|
|
|
51,710 |
|
21,013 |
|
|
|
72,723 |
|
|||||
Other securities |
|
|
|
9,984 |
|
9,897 |
|
|
|
19,881 |
|
|||||
Total |
|
$ |
825 |
|
$ |
143,343 |
|
$ |
150,977 |
|
$ |
83,398 |
|
$ |
378,543 |
|
Loans
Gross loans increased by 11.07% from year-end 2001, to $1.85 billion at September 30, 2002, compared to $1.67 billion at year-end 2001. The majority of the growth was in commercial mortgage loans, which grew by $165.96 million to $904.34 million at September 30, 2002, compared to $738.38 million at year-end 2001. Commercial loans increased by $46.16 million to $552.29 million at period-end compared to $506.13 million at year-end 2001. During the third quarter 2002, the Bank sold $2.89 million of SBA loans, resulting in a gain on sale of loans of $164,000. For the nine months ended September 30, 2002, the Bank sold $7.04 million of residential mortgage loans, resulting in a gain on sale of loans of $22,400, and sold $6.09 million of SBA loans, resulting in a gain on sale of loans of $329,000. Loans, net of deferred loan fees, represented 71.72% of average interest-earning assets for the first nine months of 2002 compared with 70.65% for the first nine months of 2001.
18
The following table sets forth the classification of loans by type, mix, and percentage change as of the dates indicated:
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
September 30, 2002 |
|
% of Total |
|
December 31, 2001 |
|
% of Total |
|
% Change |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Commercial loans |
|
$ |
552,286 |
|
30 |
% |
$ |
506,128 |
|
31 |
% |
9 |
|
Residential mortgage loans |
|
232,218 |
|
13 |
|
235,914 |
|
15 |
|
(2 |
) |
||
Commercial mortgage loans |
|
904,337 |
|
50 |
|
738,379 |
|
45 |
|
22 |
|
||
Real estate construction loans |
|
148,289 |
|
8 |
|
166,417 |
|
10 |
|
(11 |
) |
||
Installment loans |
|
14,617 |
|
1 |
|
20,322 |
|
1 |
|
(28 |
) |
||
Other loans |
|
750 |
|
|
|
745 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
||
Gross loans |
|
1,852,497 |
|
102 |
|
1,667,905 |
|
102 |
|
11 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Allowance for loan losses |
|
(23,132 |
) |
(2 |
) |
(23,973 |
) |
(2 |
) |
(4 |
) |
||
Unamortized deferred loan fees |
|
(4,225 |
) |
|
|
(3,900 |
) |
|
|
8 |
|
||
Net loans |
|
$ |
1,825,140 |
|
100 |
% |
$ |
1,640,032 |
|
100 |
% |
11 |
|
Other Real Estate Owned
Other Real Estate Owned (OREO) of $653,000, net of a valuation allowance of $131,000, decreased $902,000 at September 30, 2002, compared to $1.56 million at year-end 2001.
As of September 30, 2002, there were two outstanding OREO properties, which included one parcel of land and one commercial building. Both properties are located in Southern California. During the first nine months of 2002, we acquired two single-family-residential (SFR) properties and sold five SFR properties, two of which were properties acquired during the first half of 2002. The carrying value of the five SFR properties sold was approximately $1.31 million, and the sale resulted in gains of $395,000.
To reduce the carrying value of OREO to the estimated fair value of the properties, we maintain a valuation allowance for OREO properties. We perform periodic evaluations on each property and make corresponding adjustments to the valuation allowance, if necessary. Any decline in value is recognized by a corresponding increase to the valuation allowance in the current period. Management did not make any provision for OREO losses during the first nine months of 2002.
Investments in Real Estate
As of September 30, 2002, our investments were comprised of seven limited partnerships, three of which were acquired in 2002. We acquired an interest in the Lend Lease Institutional Tax Credits XXIII in March 2002 for $4.87 million, an interest in the WNC Institutional Tax Credit Fund X New York Series 3 in August 2002 for $577,000, and an interest in the WNC Institutional Tax Credit California Series 1 in September 2002 for $415,000. The limited partnerships are formed for the purpose of investing in low income housing projects, which qualify for federal and/or state low income housing tax credits.
As of September 30, 2002, investments in real estate increased $4.33 million to $22.06 million from $17.73 million at year-end 2001. During 2002, we recognized $1.53 million in net operating losses from six of the seven limited partnerships.
19
The following table summarizes the composition of our investments in real estate as of the dates indicated:
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Percentage
of |
|
Acquisition |
|
Carrying Amount |
|
||||
|
September 30, 2002 |
|
December 31, 2001 |
|
|||||||
Las Brisas |
|
49.5 |
% |
December 1993 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Los Robles |
|
99.0 |
% |
August 1995 |
|
351 |
|
386 |
|
||
California Corporate Tax Credit Fund III |
|
32.5 |
% |
March 1999 |
|
11,410 |
|
12,426 |
|
||
Wilshire Courtyard |
|
99.9 |
% |
May 1999 |
|
4,601 |
|
4,915 |
|
||
Lend Lease ITC XXIII |
|
4.5 |
% |
March 2002 |
|
4,712 |
|
|
|
||
WNC Institutional Tax Credit Fund New York Series 3 |
|
4.2 |
% |
August 2002 |
|
571 |
|
|
|
||
WNC Institutional Tax Credit Fund California Series 1 |
|
6.4 |
% |
September 2002 |
|
415 |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
22,060 |
|
$ |
17,727 |
|
Deposits
The increase in total assets from year-end 2001 was funded primarily by increases in deposits of $153.13 million, up 7%, to $2.28 billion at September 30, 2002. Non-interest bearing checking accounts, interest-bearing checking accounts and savings accounts comprised $101.06 million or 66% of the total growth in deposits. These deposits generally have the benefit of lower interest costs compared to time deposits. Time certificates of deposit of less than $100,000 comprised $10.79 million or 7% of the total growth in deposits, while the remaining growth of $41.28 million or 27% resulted from an increase in time certificates of deposit of $100,000 or more.
The following tables display the deposit mix as of the dates indicated:
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
September 30, 2002 |
|
% of Total |
|
December 31, 2001 |
|
% of Total |
|
% Change |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Non-interest-bearing demand deposits |
|
$ |
291,222 |
|
13 |
% |
$ |
260,427 |
|
12 |
% |
12 |
|
Interest-bearing checking deposits |
|
313,104 |
|
14 |
|
272,456 |
|
13 |
|
15 |
|
||
Savings deposit |
|
281,943 |
|
12 |
|
252,322 |
|
12 |
|
12 |
|
||
Time deposits |
|
1,389,208 |
|
61 |
|
1,337,143 |
|
63 |
|
4 |
|
||
Total deposits |
|
$ |
2,275,477 |
|
100 |
% |
$ |
2,122,348 |
|
100 |
% |
7 |
|
As interest rate spreads widened between Jumbo CDs and other types of interest-bearing deposits under the prevailing interest rate environment, our Jumbo CD portfolio continued to grow. Management believes our Jumbo CDs are generally less volatile primarily due to the following reasons:
approximately 66.72% of the Banks total Jumbo CDs have stayed with the Bank for more than two years;
the Jumbo CD portfolio continued to be diversified with 4,656 accounts averaging approximately $191,000 per account owned by 3,222 individual depositors as of July 8, 2002;
this phenomenon of having a relatively higher percentage of Jumbo CDs to total deposits exists in most of the Asian American banks in our California market due to the fact that the customers in this market tend to have a higher savings rate.
20
Management continues to monitor the Jumbo CD portfolio to identify any changes in the deposit behavior in the market and of the patrons the Bank is servicing. To discourage the concentration in Jumbo CDs, management has continued to make efforts in the following areas:
to offer only retail interest rates on Jumbo CDs;
to offer new transaction-based products, such as the tiered money market deposits;
to promote transaction-based products from time to time, such as demand deposits;
to seek to diversify the customer base by branch expansion and/or acquisition as opportunities arise.
Borrowings
Our borrowings take the form of advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco (FHLB), and repurchase agreements. During the first quarter 2002, we increased our FHLB borrowings by $20.00 million over the $30.00 million at December 31, 2001. FHLB borrowings at September 30, 2002 were $50.00 million. Securities sold under agreements to repurchase increased by $6.39 million to $28.50 million compared to $22.11 million at December 31, 2001.
Stockholders equity of $279.12 million at September 30, 2002 increased by $33.11 million, or 13.46%, compared to $246.01 million at December 31, 2001. Stockholders equity equaled 10.47% of total assets at September 30, 2002. The increase of $33.11 million in stockholders equity was due to the following:
an addition of $36.63 million from net income, less dividends paid on common stock of $7.28 million;
an increase of $1.86 million from issuance of additional common shares through the Dividend Reinvestment Plan and proceeds from exercise of stock options;
an increase of $2.16 million in accumulated other comprehensive income, including:
an increase of $3.13 million in the net unrealized holding gains on securities available-for-sale, net of tax;
an increase of $491,000 from unrealized gains on cash flow hedging derivatives, net of tax;
an increase of $1.46 million in reclassifications adjustments included in net income.
a decrease of $262,000 from stock repurchases. Pursuant to the Companys stock repurchase program, the Company repurchased a total of 7,500 shares of common stock during the third quarter 2002 at an average price of $34.89 per share.
On March 22, 2002, our Board of Directors approved and announced a two-for-one stock split of the Companys common stock, in the form of a 100% stock dividend, payable May 9, 2002, to stockholders of record on April 19, 2002. The Board of Directors also approved a 12% increase in the quarterly cash dividend from 25 cents per share to 28 cents per share on a pre-split basis, payable April 16, 2002, to stockholders of record on April 1, 2002.
We declared cash dividends of 25 cents per common share on a pre-stock split basis in January 2002 on 8,978,868 shares outstanding, cash dividends of 28 cents per common share on a pre-stock split basis in March 2002 on 8,986,860 shares outstanding, cash dividends of 14 cents per common share on
21
a post-stock split basis in July 2002 on 18,001,002 shares outstanding, and cash dividends of 14 cents per common share on a post-stock split basis in October 2002 on 18,006,544 shares outstanding. Total cash dividends paid in 2002, including the $2.52 million paid in October, amounted to $9.80 million.
Under the Equity Incentive Plan adopted by the Board of Directors in 1998, we granted options, on a pre-stock split basis, to purchase 56,720 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $65.10 per share to eligible officers and directors on February 21, 2002.
Return on average stockholders equity was 18.81% and return on average assets was 1.91% for the first nine months of 2002 compared with a return on stockholders equity of 18.29% and a return on average assets of 1.81%, during the same period a year ago.
Non-performing Assets
Total non-performing assets (NPAs) which include accruing loans past due 90 days or more, non-accrual loans, and other real estate owned (OREO) increased $2.29 million to $11.78 million from year-end 2001, and decreased $7.72 million from the Companys third quarter 2001 total of $19.50 million. As a percentage of gross loans plus OREO, non-performing assets were 0.64% at September 30, 2002 compared to 0.57% at year-end 2001 and 1.19% at September 30, 2001.
The increase in NPAs compared with year-end 2001, resulted from an increase of $5.55 million in accruing loans that were 90 days past due or more. It was primarily due to three borrowers with collaterized credits totaling $5.06 million, of which one credit totaling $959,000 was paid-off on October 4, 2002. The decrease in NPAs compared with September 30, 2001, resulted in large part from the disposition of non-accrual loans and the sale of one OREO commercial property in the fourth quarter 2001.
The following table sets forth the breakdown of non-performing assets by categories as of the dates indicated:
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
September 30, 2002 |
|
December 31, 2001 |
|
||
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more |
|
$ |
6,240 |
|
$ |
689 |
|
Non-accrual loans |
|
4,882 |
|
7,238 |
|
||
Total non-performing loans |
|
11,122 |
|
7,927 |
|
||
Real estate acquired in foreclosure |
|
653 |
|
1,555 |
|
||
Total non-performing assets |
|
$ |
11,775 |
|
$ |
9,482 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Troubled debt restructurings(1) |
|
$ |
4,223 |
|
$ |
4,474 |
|
Non-performing assets as a percentage of gross loans and OREO |
|
0.64 |
% |
0.57 |
% |
||
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of non-performing loans |
|
207.98 |
% |
302.42 |
% |
(1) Excludes $2.61 million of non-performing TDR loans, which is included with non-accrual loans, and $1.19 million of accruing TDR loans past due 90 days or more, which is included with accruing loans past due 90 days or more. Performing troubled debt restructuring loans are accruing interest at their restructured term.
22
Non-accrual Loans
Non-accrual loans of $4.88 million at September 30, 2002 consisted mainly of $2.10 million in commercial mortgage loans and $2.08 million in commercial loans. The following table presents non-accrual loans by type of collateral securing the loans, as of the dates indicated:
|
|
September 30, 2002 |
|
December 31, 2001 |
|
||||||||||||||
(In thousands) |
|
Commercial |
|
Commercial |
|
Other |
|
Commercial |
|
Commercial |
|
Other |
|
||||||
Type of Collateral |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Single/multi-family residence |
|
$ |
122 |
|
$ |
122 |
|
$ |
615 |
|
$ |
252 |
|
$ |
266 |
|
$ |
189 |
|
Commercial real estate |
|
153 |
|
109 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
839 |
|
|
|
||||||
Land |
|
1,821 |
|
447 |
|
|
|
1,821 |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
UCC |
|
|
|
1,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
3,647 |
|
|
|
||||||
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Unsecured |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
||||||
Total |
|
$ |
2,096 |
|
$ |
2,078 |
|
$ |
708 |
|
$ |
2,195 |
|
$ |
4,854 |
|
$ |
189 |
|
The following table presents non-accrual loans by type of businesses the borrowers are engaged in, as of the dates indicated:
|
|
September 30, 2002 |
|
December 31, 2001 |
|
||||||||||||||
(In thousands) |
|
Commercial |
|
Commercial |
|
Other |
|
Commercial |
|
Commercial |
|
Other |
|
||||||
Type of Business |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Real estate development |
|
$ |
1,821 |
|
$ |
109 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
1,821 |
|
$ |
27 |
|
$ |
|
|
Wholesale/Retail |
|
122 |
|
1,654 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
3,421 |
|
|
|
||||||
Food/Restaurant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
701 |
|
|
|
||||||
Import |
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
||||||
Other |
|
153 |
|
155 |
|
708 |
|
252 |
|
305 |
|
189 |
|
||||||
Total |
|
$ |
2,096 |
|
$ |
2,078 |
|
$ |
708 |
|
$ |
2,195 |
|
$ |
4,854 |
|
$ |
189 |
|
Troubled Debt Restructurings
A troubled debt restructuring (TDR) is a formal restructure of a loan when the lender, for economic or legal reasons related to the borrowers financial difficulties, grants a concession to the borrower. The concessions may be granted in various forms, including reduction in the stated interest rate, reduction in the loan balance or accrued interest, or extension of the maturity date.
Troubled debt restructurings performing under their revised terms were $4.22 million at September 30, 2002 compared to $4.47 million at December 31, 2001.
Impaired Loans
A loan is considered impaired when it is probable that a creditor will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement based on current circumstances and events.
We evaluate all classified and restructured loans for impairment. The classified loans are stratified by size, and loans less than our defined selection criteria are treated as a homogenous portfolio. If loans meeting the defined criteria are not collateral dependent, we measure the impairment based on the present value of the expected future cash flows discounted at the loans effective interest rate. If loans meeting the defined criteria are collateral dependent, we measure the impairment by using the loans observable market price or the fair value of the collateral. If the measurement of the impaired loan is
23
less than the recorded amount of the loan, we then recognize impairment by creating or adjusting an existing valuation allowance with a corresponding charge to the provision for loan losses.
Impaired loans had a recorded investment of $19.27 million and were flat at September 30, 2002 when compared to the $19.35 million at year-end 2001. Impaired commercial loans had a recorded investment of $4.94 million decreased by $1.98 million from year-end 2001, while impaired commercial mortgage loans had a recorded investment of $14.28 million increased by $1.86 million from year-end 2001. The increase in impaired commercial mortgage loans of $1.86 million was due to one current but slow-paying commercial mortgage credit, with a recorded investment of $2.23 million, which was classified as impaired during the first quarter of 2002.
The following tables present a breakdown of impaired loans and the related allowances as of the dates indicated:
|
|
At September 30, 2002 |
|
At December 31, 2001 |
|
||||||||||||||
(In thousands) |
|
Recorded |
|
Allowance |
|
Net |
|
Recorded |
|
Allowance |
|
Net |
|
||||||
Commercial |
|
$ |
4,942 |
|
$ |
741 |
|
$ |
4,201 |
|
$ |
6,924 |
|
$ |
2,143 |
|
$ |
4,781 |
|
Commercial mortgage |
|
14,284 |
|
2,043 |
|
12,241 |
|
12,426 |
|
1,764 |
|
10,662 |
|
||||||
Other |
|
40 |
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Total |
|
$ |
19,266 |
|
$ |
2,824 |
|
$ |
16,442 |
|
$ |
19,350 |
|
$ |
3,907 |
|
$ |
15,443 |
|
Loan Concentration
There were no loan concentrations to multiple borrowers in similar activities which exceeded 10% of total loans as of September 30, 2002.
Allowance for Loan Losses
The Banks management is committed to managing the risk in its loan portfolio by maintaining the allowance for loan losses at a level that is considered to be equal to the estimated and known risks in the loan portfolio. With a risk management objective, the Banks management has an established monitoring system that is designed to identify impaired and potential problem loans and permit periodic evaluation of impairment and the adequacy level of the allowance for loan losses in a timely manner. The nature of the process by which the Bank determines the appropriate allowance for loan losses requires the exercise of considerable judgment. Additions to the allowance for loan losses are increased by charges to the provision for loan losses. Identified credit exposures that are determined to be uncollectible are charged against the allowance for loan losses. Recoveries of previously charged off amounts, if any, are credited to the allowance for loan losses.
24
The following table sets forth information relating to the allowance for loan losses for the periods indicated:
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
For the
nine months ended |
|
For the
year ended |
|
||
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
23,973 |
|
$ |
21,967 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
4,500 |
|
6,373 |
|
||
Loans charged-off |
|
(5,633 |
) |
(4,663 |
) |
||
Recoveries of loans charged-off |
|
292 |
|
296 |
|
||
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
23,132 |
|
$ |
23,973 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Average net loans outstanding during the period |
|
$ |
1,687,841 |
|
$ |
1,519,548 |
|
Ratio of net charge-offs to average net loans outstanding during the period (annualized) |
|
0.42 |
% |
0.29 |
% |
||
Provision for loan losses to average net loans outstanding during the period (annualized) |
|
0.36 |
% |
0.42 |
% |
||
Allowance to non-performing loans, at period-end |
|
207.98 |
% |
302.42 |
% |
||
Allowance to gross loans, at period-end |
|
1.25 |
% |
1.44 |
% |
Commercial loans accounted for $5.56 million in charge-offs during the first nine months of 2002, primarily as a result of one credit totaling $3.62 million that was identified and reported as a non-accrual loan during the first quarter of 2002. The borrower on that credit filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy protection and the credit was charged-off.
The provision for loan losses of $1.50 million for the third quarter of 2002 was a 25.00% increase from the $1.20 million in loan loss provisions in the third quarter 2001. Net charge-offs in the amount of $402,000 during the third quarter 2002 was 0.09% of average net loans outstanding compared to net charge-offs of $768,000, or 0.20% of average net loans outstanding during the same period in 2001. Net charge-offs for the first nine months of 2002 amounted to $5.34 million or 0.42% of average net loans outstanding as of September 30, 2002. By comparison, net charge-offs for the first nine months of 2001 were $1.39 million, or 0.13% of average net loans outstanding. For the first nine months of 2002, total charge-offs totaled $5.63 million, an increase of $4.01 million or 247.07% over the same period in 2001.
Our allowance for loan losses consists of the following:
1. Specific allowance: For impaired loans, we provide specific allowances based on an evaluation of impairment, and for each criticized loan, we allocate a portion of the general allowance to each loan based on a loss percentage assigned. The percentage assigned depends on a number of factors including loan classification, the current financial condition of the borrowers and guarantors, the prevailing value of the underlying collateral, charge-off history, managements knowledge of the portfolio and general economic conditions.
2. General allowance: The unclassified portfolio is segmented on a group basis. Segmentation is determined by loan type and by identifying risk characteristics that are common to the groups of loans. The allowance is provided to each segmented group based on the groups historical loan loss experience, the trends in delinquency, and non-accrual, and other significant factors, such as national and local economy, trends and conditions, strength of management and loan staff, underwriting standards and the concentration of credit.
To determine the adequacy of the allowance in each of these two components, the Bank employs two primary methodologies, the classification process and the individual loan review analysis methodology. These methodologies support the basis for determining allocations between the various loan categories and the overall adequacy of the Banks allowance to provide for probable loss in the loan portfolio.
25
With these above methodologies, the specific allowance is for those loans internally classified and risk graded as Special Mention, Substandard, Doubtful, or Loss. Additionally, the Banks management allocates a specific allowance for Impaired Credits, in accordance with SFAS No. 114 Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan. The level of the general allowance is established to provide coverage for managements estimate of the credit risk in the loan portfolio by various loan segments not covered by the specific allowance.
On September 30, 2002, the allowance for loan losses amounted to $23.13 million, or 1.25% of total gross loans, compared with $23.97 million, or 1.44% of total gross loans, at December 31, 2001, and $24.18 million, or 1.48% of total gross loans, at September 30, 2001. The $841,000 decrease in the allowance for loan losses at September 30, 2002, from year-end 2001 was primarily the result of two commercial loans charged off during the period totaling $5.56 million.
Total commercial loans have grown from $506.13 million at December 31, 2001, to $552.29 million at September 30, 2002, with the large portion of this growth being in asset-based lending category, including the issuance of letters of credit through the Banks International Department. While this segment has been steadily growing (with the exception of the first quarter of 2002,) the growth rate was higher during the second quarter as evidenced by a $32.49 million increase at June 30, 2002, versus a $21.68 million growth rate during the three months ended September 30, 2002. Delinquencies over 29 days in this segment peaked on September 30, 2001, at $16.80 million, then trended downward to $12.58 million at September 30, 2002, as the growth rate subsided. Allowances also peaked during this same period at $10.19 million as of December 31, 2001, followed by a decline to $9.19 million after applying loan charge-offs of $5.56 million at September 30, 2002.
The allowance for residential mortgage loans was increased to $1.06 million on September 30, 2002, from the $1.05 million on June 30, 2002, in view of the 1% growth level in originations during the third quarter 2002. While delinquencies over 29 days have been trending downward and actual charge-offs have not occurred over the last year, management has determined that it is prudent to raise the level of the allowance in this loan category. This is in view of the current origination volume, and as the loss potential rises with increases in unemployment during a sluggish recovery in the economy and other adverse economic conditions.
Commercial mortgage loans grew 13.33% or $106.40 million during the third quarter 2002 over the June 30, 2002, level while the allowance allocation increased $524,000 to $6.71 million at September 30, 2002 from $6.19 million at June 30, 2002. Unusually low interest rates to rate sensitive borrowers during the third quarter have prompted a material rise in loan volume. Although the volume has increased, there has been no concentration of hotels or motels, but has consisted primarily of shopping centers, commercial office buildings, warehouses, apartment structures, and represents approximately 48.82% of the Banks gross loans at September 30, 2002. Delinquencies over 29 days in this loan segment have fluctuated from a high of $11.19 million in the first quarter of 2002 to a low of $3.33 million in the second quarter of 2002, with an average delinquent amount of $6.79 million. Loan losses have been nominal during the past nine quarters despite the variance in delinquencies. However, management has concluded that the borrowers debt service capability will depend to some degree on the direction of the economy, which, thus far, has been only a perceived gradual recovery from the recent recession.
Allowances for construction loans have remained approximately $2.22 million for the last two consecutive quarters, but down from the $3.03 million allowance that was provided by the Bank in the first quarter of 2002. The primary rationale by the Banks management for not increasing the allowance as of September 30, 2002, in this loan segment is based upon the longer term nature of
26
construction projects that are covered by interest reserves coupled with a continued decrease in loan volume and low historical loan losses, even though delinquencies over 29 days have moved upward in the current quarter from $2.1 million to $3.1 million. Thus far, management has not observed the borrowers encountering above normal difficulty in obtaining permanent takeout financing, the sizable concentration of commercial office building loans, or an increased number of request from borrowers for extensions of time to complete construction.
Allowances for installment and consumer loans have been gradually declining as the total loan volume in this segment has declined from $22.83 million at September 30, 2001, to $14.62 million as of September 30, 2002. The Bank has not actively competed for this type of loan, but has simply provided such loans, when necessary, on an accommodation basis to Bank customers. Delinquencies over 29 days have moved upward nominally from $61,000 to $122,000 before ending at $89,000 on September 30, 2002. Management has correspondingly continued to move the allowances downward from $270,000 at September 30, 2001, to the present level of $150,000 at September 30, 2002.
Allowance for other risks of probable loan losses amounted to $2.19 million as of September 30, 2002, compared to $2.17 million at June 30, 2002, and $1.34 million, at December 31, 2001. The components of the other risks that have a potential of affecting the Banks portfolio are comprised of two basic elements. First, the Bank has set aside funds to cover the risk factors of a recessionary state of a national economy and the uncertain economic forecast in the short-run. Thus far, government efforts to stimulate the economy through various fiscal and monetary policies such as tax cuts and interest rate cuts over the past one and one-half years have only resulted in the early stage of a sluggishly uncertain recovery as evidenced by eroding consumer confidence and lowered demand for non-durables, and by the lack of business investment. The events of September 11th, current corporate scandals, and potential of war against Iraq also added uncertainty. Without the business investment based upon consumer demand for non-durables, it is questionable whether the economy is capable of moving to the next stage of recovery. The economy could experience a second downturn and companies will not be able to avoid further substantial short falls in sales and earnings, business closures and downsizing, which will result in increased risk to the Banks portfolio. The second component of other portfolio risk is the potential errors in loan classification and review methodologies. Based on these components of other risks, management has increased the allocation of the allowance.
After the review of all relevant factors affecting collectibility of the various loan segments, management believes that the allowance for credit losses is appropriate given its analysis of the current quarter and the first nine months ended September 30, 2002.
27
Management seeks to maintain the Companys capital at a level sufficient to support future growth, protect depositors and stockholders, and comply with various regulatory requirements.
Both the Bancorps and the Banks regulatory capital continued to well exceed the regulatory minimum requirements as of June 30, 2002. In addition, the capital ratios of the Bank place it in the well capitalized category which is defined as institutions with total risk-based ratio equal to or greater than 10.0%, Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio equal to or greater than 6.0% and Tier 1 leverage capital ratio equal to or greater than 5.0%.
The following table presents the Bancorps capital and leverage ratios as of September 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001:
|
|
Cathay Bancorp, Inc. |
|
||||||||
|
|
September 30, 2002 |
|
December 31, 2001 |
|
||||||
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Balance |
|
% |
|
Balance |
|
% |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets) |
|
$ |
262,453 |
(4) |
11.81 |
% |
$ |
231,916 |
(5) |
11.15 |
% |
Tier 1 capital minimum requirement |
|
88,859 |
|
4.00 |
|
83,231 |
|
4.00 |
|
||
Excess |
|
$ |
173,594 |
|
7.81 |
% |
$ |
148,685 |
|
7.15 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets) |
|
$ |
285,585 |
(4) |
12.86 |
% |
$ |
255,904 |
(5) |
12.30 |
% |
Total capital minimum requirement |
|
177,717 |
|
8.00 |
|
166,462 |
|
8.00 |
|
||
Excess |
|
$ |
107,868 |
|
4.86 |
% |
$ |
89,442 |
|
4.30 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Tier 1 capital (to average assets) Leverage ratio |
|
$ |
262,453 |
(4) |
10.01 |
% |
$ |
231,916 |
(5) |
9.48 |
% |
Minimum leverage requirement |
|
104,858 |
|
4.00 |
|
97,843 |
|
4.00 |
|
||
Excess |
|
$ |
157,595 |
|
6.01 |
% |
$ |
134,073 |
|
5.48 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Risk-weighted assets |
|
$ |
2,221,463 |
(4) |
|
|
$ |
2,080,776 |
(5) |
|
|
Total average assets |
|
$ |
2,621,448 |
|
|
|
$ |
2,446,084 |
|
|
|
(4) Risk-weighted assets exclude the net valuation gains on securities available-for-sale of $11.34 million, except for $1.22 million of valuation losses on equity securities available-for-sale, which are included. Tier 1 Capital and Total Capital exclude goodwill and other intangible assets of $8.84 million, and accumulated other comprehensive income of $5.87 million.
(5) Risk-weighted assets exclude the net valuation gains on securities available-for-sale of $7.47 million, except for $298,000 of valuation losses on equity securities available-for-sale, which are included. Tier 1 Capital and Total Capital exclude goodwill of $8.88 million, and accumulated other comprehensive income of $5.06 million.
28
The following table presents the Banks capital and leverage ratios as of September 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001:
|
|
Cathay Bank |
|
||||||||
|
|
September 30, 2002 |
|
December 31, 2001 |
|
||||||
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Balance |
|
% |
|
Balance |
|
% |
|
||
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets) |
|
$ |
253,428 |
(4) |
11.43 |
% |
$ |
224,239 |
(5) |
10.80 |
% |
Tier 1 capital minimum requirement |
|
88,693 |
|
4.00 |
|
83,064 |
|
4.00 |
|
||
Excess |
|
$ |
164,735 |
|
7.43 |
% |
$ |
141,175 |
|
6.80 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets) |
|
$ |
276,560 |
(4) |
12.47 |
% |
$ |
248,227 |
(5) |
11.95 |
% |
Total capital minimum requirement |
|
177,386 |
|
8.00 |
|
166,129 |
|
8.00 |
|
||
Excess |
|
$ |
99,174 |
|
4.47 |
% |
$ |
82,098 |
|
3.95 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Tier 1 capital (to average assets) Leverage ratio |
|
$ |
253,428 |
(4) |
9.68 |
% |
$ |
224,239 |
(5) |
9.18 |
% |
Minimum leverage requirement |
|
104,676 |
|
4.00 |
|
97,665 |
|
4.00 |
|
||
Excess |
|
$ |
148,752 |
|
5.68 |
% |
$ |
126,574 |
|
5.18 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Risk-weighted assets |
|
$ |
2,217,328 |
(4) |
|
|
$ |
2,076,608 |
(5) |
|
|
Total average assets |
|
$ |
2,616,897 |
|
|
|
$ |
2,441,623 |
|
|
|
(4) Risk-weighted assets exclude the net valuation gains on securities available-for-sale of $11.34 million, and include $1.22 million of valuation losses on equity securities available-for-sale. Tier 1 Capital and Total Capital excludes goodwill and other intangible assets of $8.84 million, and accumulated other comprehensive income of $5.87 million.
(5) Risk-weighted assets exclude the net valuation gains on securities available-for-sale of $7.47 million, and include $229,000 of valuation losses on equity securities available-for-sale. Tier 1 Capital and Total Capital excludes goodwill of $8.88 million, and accumulated other comprehensive income of $5.06 million.
Liquidity is our ability to maintain sufficient cash flow to meet maturing financial obligations and customer credit needs, and to take advantage of investment opportunities as they are presented in the marketplace. Our principal sources of liquidity are growth in deposits, proceeds from the maturity or sale of securities and other financial instruments, repayments from securities and loans, Federal funds purchased, and securities sold under agreements to repurchase, and advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB). At September 30, 2002, our liquidity ratio (defined as net cash, short-term and marketable securities to net deposits and short-term liabilities) increased to 31.06% compared to 30.40% at year-end 2001.
To supplement its liquidity needs, the Bank maintains a total credit line of $52.50 million for federal funds with three correspondent banks, and master agreements with five brokerage firms whereby up to $230.00 million would be available through the sale of securities subject to repurchase. The Bank is also a shareholder of the FHLB, which enables the Bank to have access to lower cost FHLB financing when necessary. At September 30, 2002, the Bank had a total approved credit with the FHLB of San Francisco totaling $643.63 million, of which $483.73 million was approved credit for terms over five years. The total credit outstanding with the FHLB of San Francisco at September 30, 2002, was $50.00 million. These advances are non-callable and bear fixed interest rates, with $10.00 million maturing in 2003, $20.00 million maturing in 2004, and $20.00 million maturing in 2005. These borrowings are secured by residential mortgages.
Liquidity can also be provided through the sale of liquid assets, which consists of short-term investments and securities available-for-sale. At September 30, 2002, such assets at fair value totaled $243.08 million, with $85.33 million pledged as collateral for borrowings and other commitments.
29
We had a significant portion of our time deposits maturing within one year or less as of September 30, 2002. Management anticipates that there may be some outflow of these deposits upon maturity due to the keen competition in the Companys marketplace. However, based on our historical runoff experience, we expect the outflow will be minimal and can be replenished through our normal growth in deposits. Management believes all the above-mentioned sources will provide adequate liquidity to the Company to meet its daily operating needs.
The Bancorp obtains funding for its activities primarily through dividend income contributed by the Bank, proceeds from the Dividend Reinvestment Plan and the Equity Incentive Plan. Dividends paid to the Bancorp by the Bank are subject to regulatory limitations. The business activities of the Bancorp consist primarily of the operation of the Bank with limited activities in other investments. Management believes the Bancorps liquidity generated from its prevailing sources is sufficient to meet its operational needs.
The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of our financial statements. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Accounting for the allowance for loan losses involves significant judgments and assumptions by management, which has a material impact on the carrying value of net loans; management considers this accounting policy to be a critical accounting policy. The judgments and assumptions used by management are based on historical experience and other factors, which are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances as described under the heading Allowance for Loan Losses.
30
Market risk is the risk of loss from adverse changes in market prices and rates. The principal market risk to the Company is the interest rate risk inherent in our lending, investing, and deposit taking activities, due to the fact that interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities do not change at the same rate, to the same extent, or on the same basis.
We actively monitor and manage our interest rate risk through analyzing the repricing characteristics of our loans, securities, and deposits on an on-going basis. The primary objective is to minimize the adverse effects of changes in interest rates on our earnings, and ultimately the underlying market value of equity, while structuring our asset-liability composition to obtain the maximum spread. Management uses certain basic measurement tools in conjunction with established risk limits to regulate its interest rate exposure. Due to the limitation inherent in any individual risk management tool, we use both an interest rate sensitivity analysis and a simulation model to measure and quantify the impact to our profitability or the market value of our assets and liabilities.
The interest rate sensitivity analysis details the expected maturity and repricing opportunities mismatch or sensitivity gap between interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities over a specified timeframe. A positive gap exists when rate sensitive assets which reprice over a given time period exceed rate sensitive liabilities. During periods of increasing interest rates, net interest margin may be enhanced with a positive gap. A negative gap exists when rate sensitive liabilities which reprice over a given time period exceed rate sensitive assets. During periods of increasing interest rates, net interest margin may be impaired with a negative gap.
The following table indicates the maturity or repricing and rate sensitivity of our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities as of September 30, 2002. Our exposure, as reflected in the table, represents the estimated difference between the amount of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities repricing during future periods based on certain assumptions. The interest rate sensitivity of our assets and liabilities presented in the table may vary if different assumptions were used or if actual experience differs from the assumptions used. As reflected in the table below, we were asset sensitive with a gap ratio of a positive 27.82% within three months, and a positive cumulative gap ratio of 4.23% within one year at September 30, 2002, compared with a positive gap ratio of 18.67 % within three months, and a negative cumulative gap ratio of 5.18% within one year at year-end 2001.
31
|
|
September
30, 2002 |
|
||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Within |
|
Over 3
Months |
|
Over 1
Year |
|
Over |
|
Non-interest |
|
Total |
|
||||||
Interest-earning Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
724 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
64,922 |
|
$ |
65,646 |
|
Federal funds sold |
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
||||||
Securities available-for-sale(6) |
|
28,139 |
|
10,340 |
|
192,927 |
|
32,632 |
|
|
|
264,038 |
|
||||||
Securities held-to-maturity |
|
|
|
825 |
|
143,343 |
|
234,375 |
|
|
|
378,543 |
|
||||||
Loans receivable, gross(7) |
|
1,406,839 |
|
47,237 |
|
87,117 |
|
306,422 |
|
|
|
1,847,615 |
|
||||||
Non-interest-earning assets, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,242 |
|
79,242 |
|
||||||
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,465,702 |
|
$ |
58,402 |
|
$ |
423,387 |
|
$ |
573,429 |
|
$ |
144,164 |
|
$ |
2,665,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Interest-bearing Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Demand deposits |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
291,222 |
|
$ |
291,222 |
|
Money market and NOW deposits(8) |
|
13,811 |
|
48,471 |
|
126,258 |
|
124,564 |
|
|
|
313,104 |
|
||||||
Savings deposit(8) |
|
11,382 |
|
60,890 |
|
140,280 |
|
69,391 |
|
|
|
281,943 |
|
||||||
TCDs under $100 |
|
222,633 |
|
180,924 |
|
21,721 |
|
|
|
|
|
425,278 |
|
||||||
TCDs $100 and over |
|
447,845 |
|
396,858 |
|
119,227 |
|
|
|
|
|
963,930 |
|
||||||
Total deposits |
|
695,671 |
|
687,143 |
|
407,486 |
|
193,955 |
|
291,222 |
|
2,275,477 |
|
||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
28,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,500 |
|
||||||
Advances from FHLB |
|
|
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
||||||
Non-interest-bearing other liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,982 |
|
31,982 |
|
||||||
Stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
279,125 |
|
279,125 |
|
||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
724,171 |
|
$ |
687,143 |
|
$ |
457,486 |
|
$ |
193,955 |
|
$ |
602,329 |
|
$ |
2,665,084 |
|
Interest sensitivity gap |
|
$ |
741,531 |
|
$ |
(628,741 |
) |
$ |
(34,099 |
) |
$ |
379,474 |
|
$ |
(458,165 |
) |
|
|
|
Cumulative interest sensitivity gap |
|
$ |
741,531 |
|
$ |
112,790 |
|
$ |
78,691 |
|
$ |
458,165 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Gap ratio (% of total assets) |
|
27.82 |
% |
(23.59 |
)% |
(1.28 |
)% |
14.24 |
% |
(17.19 |
)% |
|
|
||||||
Cumulative gap ratio |
|
27.82 |
% |
4.23 |
% |
2.95 |
% |
17.19 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Since interest rate sensitivity analysis does not measure the timing differences in the repricing of assets and liabilities, we use a net interest income simulation model to measure the extent of the differences in the behavior of the lending and funding rates to changing interest rates, so as to project future earnings or market values under alternative interest rate scenarios. Interest rate risk arises primarily through the Companys traditional business activities of extending loans and accepting deposits. Many factors, including economic and financial conditions, movements in interest rates and consumer preferences affect the spread between interest earned on assets and interest paid on liabilities. The net interest income simulation model is designed to measure the volatility of net interest income and net portfolio value, defined as net present value of assets and liabilities, under immediate rising or falling interest rate scenarios in 100 basis points increments.
Although the modeling is very helpful in managing interest rate risk, it does require significant assumptions for the projection of loan prepayment rates on mortgage related assets, loan volumes and pricing, and deposit and borrowing volume and pricing, that might prove inaccurate. Because these assumptions are inherently uncertain, the model cannot precisely estimate net interest income, or precisely predict the effect of higher or lower interest rates on net interest income. Actual results will
(6) Includes $4.03 million of venture capital investments and $23.73 million of variable-rate agency preferred stock in the Within three months column. All other available-for-sale debt securities are fixed-rate and are allocated based on their contractual maturity date.
(7) Excludes allowance for loan losses of $23.13 million, unamortized deferred loan fees of $4.23 million and $4.88 million of non-accrual loans, which are included in non-interest-earning assets. Adjustable-rate loans are included in the within three months category, as they are subject to an interest adjustment depending upon the terms on the loan.
(8) The Companys own historical experience and decay factors are used to estimate the money market NOW, and savings deposit runoff.
32
differ from simulated results due to the timing, magnitude, and frequency of interest rates changes, the differences between actual experience and the assumed volume, changes in market conditions, and management strategies among other factors. The Company monitors its interest rate sensitivity and attempts to reduce the risk of a significant decrease in net interest income caused by a change in interest rates.
We establish a tolerance level in our policy to define and limit interest income volatility to a change of plus or minus 30% when the hypothetical rate change is plus or minus 200 basis points. When the net interest rate simulation projects that our tolerance level will be met or exceeded, we seek corrective action after considering, among other things, market conditions, customer reaction, and the estimated impact on profitability. The results after running our simulation indicated that if interest rates were to increase instantaneously or decrease instantaneously by 200 basis points, the change to our net interest income is within our tolerance level and comparable to our December 31, 2001, results. On November 7, 2002, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) lowered its target for the federal funds rate by 50 basis points. The Bank is asset sensitive, and in the absence of any additional interest rate movements by the FOMC, this rate decrease is expected to decrease net interest income by 4.61% in the next three months, by 4.03% within the next six months, and by 3.48% within the next twelve months.
The Companys net interest income simulation model also projects the net economic value of our portfolio of assets and liabilities. We have established a tolerance level to value the net economic value of our portfolio of assets and liabilities in our policy to a change of plus or minus 30% when the hypothetical rate change is plus or minus 200 basis points. The results after running our simulation indicated that if interest rates were to increase instantaneously or decrease instantaneously by 200 basis points, the economic value of our portfolio of assets and liabilities is within our tolerance level and comparable to our December 31, 2001 results.
It is the policy of the Bank not to speculate on the future direction of interest rates. However, the Company enters into financial derivatives in order to seek mitigation of exposure to interest rate risks related to our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. We believe that these transactions, when properly structured and managed, may provide a hedge against inherent interest rate risk in the assets or liabilities and against risk in specific transactions. In such instances, the Bank may protect its position through the purchase or sale of interest rate futures contracts for a specific cash or interest rate risk position. Other hedge transactions may be implemented using interest rate swaps, interest rate caps, floors, financial futures, forward rate agreements, and options on futures or bonds. Prior to considering any hedging activities, we seek to analyze the costs and benefits of the hedge in comparison to other viable alternative strategies. All hedges will require an assessment of basis risk and must be approved by the Banks Investment Committee. For periods prior to January 1, 2001, for those qualifying financial derivatives that altered the interest rate characteristics of assets or liabilities, the net differential to be paid or received on the financial derivative was treated as an adjustment to the yield on the underlying assets or liabilities. Interest rate financial derivatives that did not qualify for the accrual method were recorded at fair value, with gains and losses recorded in earnings.
Effective January 1, 2001, the Company adopted SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended by SFAS No. 137 and No. 138. SFAS No. 133 establishes accounting and reporting standards for financial derivatives, including certain financial derivatives embedded in other contracts, and hedging activities. It requires the recognition of all
33
financial derivatives as assets or liabilities in the Companys statement of financial condition and measurement of those financial derivatives at fair value. The accounting treatment of changes in fair value is dependent upon whether or not a financial derivative is designated as a hedge and if so, the type of hedge.
Upon adoption of SFAS No. 133, the Company recognized all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. Fair value is based on dealer quotes, or quoted prices from instruments with similar characteristics. The Company uses financial derivatives designated for hedging activities as cash flow hedges. For derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, changes in fair value are recognized in other comprehensive income until the hedged item is recognized in earnings.
On March 21, 2000, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement with a major financial institution in the notional amount of $20.00 million for a period of five years. The interest rate swap was for the purpose of hedging the cash flows from a portion of our floating rate loans against declining interest rates. The purpose of the hedge is to provide a measure of stability in the future cash receipts from such loans over the term of the swap agreement, which at September 30, 2002, was approximately two and a half years. At September 30, 2002, the fair value of the interest rate swap was $2.36 million, exclusive of accrued interest, or $1.37 million, net of tax compared to $1.67 million, exclusive of accrued interest, or $973,000, net of tax, at December 31, 2001. For the nine months ended September 30, 2002, net amounts totaling $790,000 were reclassified into earnings. The estimated net amount of the existing gains within accumulated other comprehensive income that are expected to reclassify into earnings within the next 12 months is approximately $1.07 million.
Based on their evaluation, as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the Company have concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in 17 CFR §§240.13a-14(c) and 240.15d-14(c)) are effective. There were no significant changes in the Companys internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to their date of evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
The Bancorps wholly-owned subsidiary, Cathay Bank, has been a party to ordinary routine litigation from time to time incidental to various aspects of its operations.
Management is not currently aware of any litigation that is expected to have material adverse impact on the Companys consolidated financial condition, or the results of operations.
34
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
None.
Not applicable.
Exhibits:
Exhibit 99.1 |
CEO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 |
|
|
Exhibit 99.2 |
CFO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 |
Reports on Form 8-K:
None
35
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
Cathay Bancorp, Inc. |
|
||
|
(Registrant) |
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
Date: November 14, 2002 |
By /s/ DUNSON K. CHENG |
|
||
|
Dunson K. Cheng |
|||
|
Chairman and President |
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
Date: November 14, 2002 |
By /s/ ANTHONY M. TANG |
|
||
|
Anthony M. Tang |
|||
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|||
36
I, Dunson K. Cheng, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cathay Bancorp, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and
c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and
6. The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Date: November 14, 2002 |
By /s/ DUNSON K. CHENG |
|
|
Dunson K. Cheng |
|
|
Chairman and President |
37
I, Anthony M. Tang, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cathay Bancorp, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and
c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and
6. The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Date: November 14, 2002 |
By /s/ ANTHONY M. TANG |
|
|
Anthony M. Tang |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
38