Washington, D.C. 20549
ý |
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Quarterly Period ended September 30, 2002
OR
o |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For transition period from _____________ to _____________
Commission File Number 0 -17609
|
WEST SUBURBAN BANCORP, INC. |
|
||||
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter) |
||||||
|
|
|
||||
Illinois |
|
36-3452469 |
||||
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
||||
|
|
|
||||
711 South Meyers Road, Lombard, Illinois |
|
60148 |
||||
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
||||
|
|
|
||||
Registrants telephone number including area code: |
(630) 629-4200 |
|
||||
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the Issuers class of common stock as of the latest practicable date.
15,000,000 shares of Common Stock, no par value, were authorized, and 432,495 shares of Common Stock were issued and outstanding, as of November 1, 2002.
WEST SUBURBAN BANCORP, INC.
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report
Table of Contents
|
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special Note Concerning Forward-Looking Statements
This document (including information incorporated by reference) contains, and future oral and written statements of the Company and its management may contain, forward-looking statements within the meaning of such term in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 with respect to the financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance and business of West Suburban Bancorp, Inc. (West Suburban) and West Suburban Bank (the Bank and collectively with West Suburban and its other subsidiaries, the Company). Forward-looking statements, which may be based upon beliefs, expectations and assumptions of the Companys management and on information currently available to management, are generally identifiable by the use of words such as believe, expect, anticipate, plan, intend, estimate, may, will, would, could, should or other similar expressions. Additionally, all statements in this document, including forward-looking statements, speak only as of the date they are made, and the Company undertakes no obligation to update any statement in light of new information or future events.
The Companys ability to predict results or the actual effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. Factors which could have a material adverse effect on the operations and future prospects of the Company and its subsidiaries include, but are not limited to, the following:
The strength of the United States economy in general and the strength of the local economies in which the Company conducts its operations which may be less favorable than expected and may result in, among other things, a deterioration in the credit quality and value of the Companys assets.
The economic impact of terrorist attacks and the response of the United States to any such threats and attacks.
The effects of, and changes in, federal, state and local laws, regulations and policies affecting banking, securities, insurance and monetary and financial matters.
The effects of changes in interest rates (including the effects of changes in the rate of prepayments of the Companys assets) and the policies of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
The ability of the Company to compete with other financial institutions as effectively as the Company currently intends due to increases in competitive pressures in the financial services sector.
The inability of the Company to obtain new customers and to retain existing customers.
The timely development and acceptance of products and services, including products and services offered through alternative delivery channels such as the Internet.
Technological changes implemented by the Company and by other parties, including third party vendors, which may be more difficult or more expensive than anticipated or which may have unforeseen consequences to the Company and its customers.
The ability of the Company to develop and maintain secure and reliable electronic systems.
The ability of the Company to retain key executives and employees and the difficulty that the Company may experience in replacing key executives and employees in an effective manner.
Consumer spending and saving habits which may change in a manner that affects the Companys business adversely.
Business combinations and the integration of acquired businesses which may be more difficult or expensive than expected.
The costs, effects and outcomes of existing or future litigation.
Changes in accounting policies and practices, as may be adopted by state and federal regulatory agencies and the Financial Accounting Standards Board.
The ability of the Company to manage the risks associated with the foregoing as well as anticipated.
These risks and uncertainties should be considered in evaluating forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. Additional information concerning the Company and its business, including other factors that could materially affect the Companys financial results, is included in the Companys other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
WEST SUBURBAN BANCORP, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in thousands)
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
September
30, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
30,876 |
|
$ |
32,870 |
|
Federal funds sold |
|
38,286 |
|
14,206 |
|
||
Total cash and cash equivalents |
|
69,162 |
|
47,076 |
|
||
Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Available for sale (amortized cost of $233,387 in 2002 and $147,181 in 2001) |
|
237,826 |
|
147,847 |
|
||
Held to maturity (fair value of $62,722 in 2002 and $121,364 in 2001) |
|
61,354 |
|
120,968 |
|
||
Total securities |
|
299,180 |
|
268,815 |
|
||
Loans, less allowance for loan losses of $13,117 in 2002 and $12,262 in 2001 |
|
1,128,268 |
|
1,093,376 |
|
||
Premises and equipment, net |
|
44,841 |
|
43,877 |
|
||
Other real estate |
|
1,386 |
|
1,410 |
|
||
Accrued interest and other assets |
|
17,178 |
|
19,005 |
|
||
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,560,015 |
|
$ |
1,473,559 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Noninterest-bearing demand |
|
$ |
144,999 |
|
$ |
148,044 |
|
Interest-bearing |
|
1,247,160 |
|
1,161,676 |
|
||
Total deposits |
|
1,392,159 |
|
1,309,720 |
|
||
Accrued interest and other liabilities |
|
15,980 |
|
18,824 |
|
||
Total liabilities |
|
1,408,139 |
|
1,328,544 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Common stock in ESOP subject to contingent repurchase obligation |
|
40,347 |
|
40,645 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Common stock, no par value; 15,000,000 shares authorized; 432,495 shares issued and outstanding |
|
3,457 |
|
3,457 |
|
||
Surplus |
|
38,066 |
|
38,066 |
|
||
Retained earnings |
|
107,675 |
|
103,091 |
|
||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
2,678 |
|
401 |
|
||
Amount reclassified on ESOP shares |
|
(40,347 |
) |
(40,645 |
) |
||
Total shareholders equity |
|
111,529 |
|
104,370 |
|
||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
1,560,015 |
|
$ |
1,473,559 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2002 AND 2001
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
2002 |
|
2001 |
|
||
Interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Loans, including fees |
|
$ |
53,265 |
|
$ |
64,304 |
|
Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Taxable |
|
10,178 |
|
10,617 |
|
||
Exempt from federal income tax |
|
933 |
|
1,013 |
|
||
Federal funds sold |
|
323 |
|
762 |
|
||
Total interest income |
|
64,699 |
|
76,696 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Deposits |
|
21,349 |
|
32,342 |
|
||
Other |
|
35 |
|
84 |
|
||
Total interest expense |
|
21,384 |
|
32,426 |
|
||
Net interest income |
|
43,315 |
|
44,270 |
|
||
Provision for loan losses |
|
2,925 |
|
1,175 |
|
||
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
|
40,390 |
|
43,095 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Noninterest income |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Service fees on deposit accounts |
|
3,535 |
|
2,782 |
|
||
Debit card fees |
|
1,127 |
|
947 |
|
||
Net realized gains on securities transactions |
|
721 |
|
1,875 |
|
||
Write-down of carrying value of securities available for sale |
|
|
|
(1,012 |
) |
||
Net gain on sales of loans held for sale |
|
459 |
|
250 |
|
||
Other |
|
3,305 |
|
3,649 |
|
||
Total noninterest income |
|
9,147 |
|
8,491 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Noninterest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Salaries and employee benefits |
|
14,936 |
|
14,277 |
|
||
Occupancy |
|
2,735 |
|
2,669 |
|
||
Furniture and equipment |
|
3,324 |
|
3,327 |
|
||
Advertising and promotion |
|
1,390 |
|
841 |
|
||
Professional fees |
|
608 |
|
652 |
|
||
Other |
|
4,624 |
|
4,156 |
|
||
Total noninterest expense |
|
27,617 |
|
25,922 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Income before income taxes |
|
21,920 |
|
25,664 |
|
||
Income tax expense |
|
7,172 |
|
8,281 |
|
||
Net income |
|
$ |
14,748 |
|
$ |
17,383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Earnings per share (432,495 shares outstanding) |
|
$ |
34.10 |
|
$ |
40.19 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
WEST SUBURBAN BANCORP, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2002 AND 2001
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(UNAUDITED)
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
WEST SUBURBAN BANCORP, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2002 AND 2001
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
Common |
|
Retained |
|
Accumulated |
|
Amount |
|
Total |
|
Common |
|
||||||
Balance, January 1, 2001 |
|
$ |
41,523 |
|
$ |
100,208 |
|
$ |
(1,963 |
) |
$ |
(37,644 |
) |
$ |
102,124 |
|
$ |
37,644 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Net income |
|
|
|
17,383 |
|
|
|
|
|
17,383 |
|
|
|
||||||
Unrealized gain on available for sale securities, net of reclassification and tax effects |
|
|
|
|
|
2,992 |
|
|
|
2,992 |
|
|
|
||||||
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,375 |
|
|
|
||||||
Cash dividends declared - $22.50 per share |
|
|
|
(9,732 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(9,732 |
) |
|
|
||||||
Reclassification due to change in fair value of stock subject to contingent repurchase obligation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,564 |
) |
(2,564 |
) |
2,564 |
|
||||||
Balance, September 30, 2001 |
|
$ |
41,523 |
|
$ |
107,859 |
|
$ |
1,029 |
|
$ |
(40,208 |
) |
$ |
110,203 |
|
$ |
40,208 |
|
|
|
Common |
|
Retained |
|
Accumulated |
|
Amount |
|
Total |
|
Common |
|
||||||
Balance, January 1, 2002 |
|
$ |
41,523 |
|
$ |
103,091 |
|
$ |
401 |
|
$ |
(40,645 |
) |
$ |
104,370 |
|
$ |
40,645 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Net income |
|
|
|
14,748 |
|
|
|
|
|
14,748 |
|
|
|
||||||
Unrealized gain on available for sale securities, net of reclassification and tax effects |
|
|
|
|
|
2,277 |
|
|
|
2,277 |
|
|
|
||||||
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,025 |
|
|
|
||||||
Cash dividends declared - $23.50 per share |
|
|
|
(10,164 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(10,164 |
) |
|
|
||||||
Reclassification due to change in fair value of stock subject to contingent repurchase obligation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
298 |
|
298 |
|
(298 |
) |
||||||
Balance, September 30, 2002 |
|
$ |
41,523 |
|
$ |
107,675 |
|
$ |
2,678 |
|
$ |
(40,347 |
) |
$ |
111,529 |
|
$ |
40,347 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2002 AND 2001
(Dollars in thousands)
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
2002 |
|
2001 |
|
||
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net income |
|
$ |
14,748 |
|
$ |
17,383 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Depreciation |
|
2,797 |
|
2,784 |
|
||
Provision for loan losses |
|
2,925 |
|
1,175 |
|
||
Deferred income tax expense (benefit) |
|
201 |
|
(386 |
) |
||
Net premium amortization of securities |
|
499 |
|
242 |
|
||
Net realized gains on securities transactions |
|
(721 |
) |
(1,875 |
) |
||
Write-down of carrying value of securities available for sale |
|
|
|
1,012 |
|
||
Federal Home Loan Bank stock dividends |
|
(176 |
) |
(226 |
) |
||
Net gain on sales of loans held for sale |
|
(459 |
) |
(250 |
) |
||
Sales of loans held for sale |
|
37,733 |
|
26,301 |
|
||
Origination of loans held for sale |
|
(36,730 |
) |
(27,016 |
) |
||
Net gain on sales of premises and equipment |
|
(8 |
) |
(7 |
) |
||
Net gain on sales of other real estate |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
||
Decrease (increase) in accrued interest and other assets |
|
129 |
|
(535 |
) |
||
Increase (decrease) in accrued interest and other liabilities |
|
1,265 |
|
(747 |
) |
||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
22,203 |
|
17,844 |
|
||
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Securities available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Sales |
|
115,436 |
|
8,656 |
|
||
Maturities and calls |
|
96,066 |
|
72,553 |
|
||
Purchases |
|
(297,259 |
) |
(107,705 |
) |
||
Securities held to maturity |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Maturities and calls |
|
69,038 |
|
172,738 |
|
||
Purchases |
|
(9,475 |
) |
(110,500 |
) |
||
Net increase in loans |
|
(39,463 |
) |
(43,326 |
) |
||
Purchases of premises and equipment |
|
(3,796 |
) |
(6,029 |
) |
||
Sales of premises and equipment |
|
43 |
|
7 |
|
||
Proceeds from sale of other real estate |
|
1,126 |
|
868 |
|
||
Investment in company-owned life insurance policies |
|
|
|
(845 |
) |
||
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
(68,284 |
) |
(13,583 |
) |
||
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net increase in deposits |
|
82,439 |
|
16,463 |
|
||
Dividends paid |
|
(14,272 |
) |
(14,056 |
) |
||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
68,167 |
|
2,407 |
|
||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
22,086 |
|
6,668 |
|
||
Beginning cash and cash equivalents |
|
47,076 |
|
61,267 |
|
||
Ending cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
69,162 |
|
$ |
67,935 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Supplemental disclosures |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash paid for |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Interest |
|
$ |
23,190 |
|
$ |
36,139 |
|
Income taxes |
|
5,126 |
|
8,212 |
|
||
Other real estate acquired through loan foreclosures |
|
1,102 |
|
327 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
WEST SUBURBAN BANCORP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
(Dollars in thousands except per share data)
The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of West Suburban Bancorp, Inc. (West Suburban) and West Suburban Bank (the Bank and collectively with West Suburban, the Company). Significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements are prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations for reporting on Form 10-Q. Accordingly, certain information and footnote disclosures normally accompanying the annual financial statements have been omitted. The interim financial statements and notes should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the latest Annual Report on Form 10-K filed by the Company. The condensed consolidated financial statements include all adjustments (none of which were other than normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods. The results for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire fiscal year. Certain amounts reported in prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the 2002 presentation.
NOTE 2 - FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS WITH OFF-BALANCE SHEET RISK
Unused lines of credit and other commitments to extend credit not reflected in the financial statements are as follows:
|
|
September 30, 2002 |
|
December 31, 2001 |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
Fixed |
|
Variable |
|
Total |
|
Fixed |
|
Variable |
|
Total |
|
||||||
Home equity lines |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
170,813 |
|
$ |
170,813 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
161,824 |
|
$ |
161,824 |
|
Commercial loans |
|
11,622 |
|
168,576 |
|
180,198 |
|
12,399 |
|
185,304 |
|
197,703 |
|
||||||
Mortgage loans |
|
14,102 |
|
2,419 |
|
16,521 |
|
12,806 |
|
4,470 |
|
17,276 |
|
||||||
Letters of credit |
|
|
|
32,328 |
|
32,328 |
|
|
|
20,736 |
|
20,736 |
|
||||||
Check credit loans |
|
107 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
116 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
||||||
Credit card lines |
|
|
|
99,089 |
|
99,089 |
|
|
|
58,974 |
|
58,974 |
|
||||||
Total |
|
$ |
25,831 |
|
$ |
473,225 |
|
$ |
499,056 |
|
$ |
25,321 |
|
$ |
431,308 |
|
$ |
456,629 |
|
Fixed rate commercial loan commitments at September 30, 2002 generally had interest rates ranging from 4.25% to 9.29% with terms ranging from 1 to 15 years. Fixed rate mortgage loan commitments at September 30, 2002 generally had interest rates ranging from 5.625% to 6.25% with terms ranging from 10 to 30 years. Fixed rate check credit loans had an interest rate of 18.00% as of September 30, 2002.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (Statement) 147, Acquisitions of Certain Financial Institutions in October 2002. Statement 147 supersedes the guidance followed by the Company in Statement 72, Accounting for Certain Acquisitions of Banking or Thrift Institutions. Based on the guidance in Statement 72, the Company continued to amortize goodwill periodically to earnings in 2002. The Companys goodwill arose from its acquisition of a financially troubled thrift institution many years ago. The guidance in Statement 147 indicates that the Companys acquisition of the troubled thrift institution is a business combination resulting in goodwill that should be accounted for under Statement 142.
In connection with the adoption of Statement 147 on July 1, 2002, the Company reversed $102 of goodwill that was amortized in the six months ended June 30, 2002 according to the guidance in Statement 72. Previously reported quarterly and year-to-date operating results for 2002 will be restated as follows upon the adoption of Statement 147.
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Six months ended |
|
|||||
|
|
June 30 |
|
March 31 |
|
June 30 |
|
|||
Net Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
As originally reported |
|
$ |
4,727 |
|
$ |
5,099 |
|
$ |
9,826 |
|
Effect of Statement 147 |
|
51 |
|
51 |
|
102 |
|
|||
As restated |
|
$ |
4,778 |
|
$ |
5,150 |
|
$ |
9,928 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
As originally reported |
|
$ |
10.93 |
|
$ |
11.79 |
|
$ |
22.72 |
|
Effect of Statement 147 |
|
0.12 |
|
0.12 |
|
0.24 |
|
|||
As restated |
|
$ |
11.05 |
|
$ |
11.91 |
|
$ |
22.96 |
|
Goodwill is carried on the Companys balance sheet at $712 as of both September 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001.
NOTE 4 - COMMON STOCK IN ESOP SUBJECT TO CONTINGENT REPURCHASE OBLIGATION
At September 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001, the ESOP held 73,491 and 75,972 shares of Company common stock, respectively, and substantially all shares held by the ESOP were allocated to the accounts maintained for participants. Participants who elect to receive their benefit payments in the form of Company common stock may require the Company to purchase the common stock distributed at fair value during two 60-day periods. The first purchase period begins on the distribution date and the second purchase period begins on the first anniversary of the distribution date. This contingent repurchase obligation is reflected in the Companys financial statements as Common stock in ESOP subject to contingent repurchase obligation and reduces shareholders equity by an amount that represents the independently appraised fair value of all the Company common stock held by the ESOP, without regard to whether it is likely that the shares would be distributed or that the recipients of the shares would be likely to exercise their right to require the Company to purchase the shares. At September 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001, this contingent repurchase obligation reduced shareholders equity by $40,347 and $40,645, respectively. The Company believes that the ESOP will continue to have a sufficient amount of cash to distribute benefit payments to former employees and that the exercise of the right of former employees to cause the Company to purchase Company common stock is unlikely.
Asset Distribution. Total consolidated assets and total year-to-date average assets at September 30, 2002 both increased 5.9% from December 31, 2001. An increase in securities available for sale was the largest component of the increase in total assets and was partially offset by a decrease in securities held to maturity. Asset growth was funded primarily by higher levels of deposits.
Cash and cash equivalents at September 30, 2002 increased 46.9% from December 31, 2001 due to increases in federal funds sold. These increases were primarily due to increases in deposits.
The Companys available for sale securities portfolio increased 60.9% during the first nine months of 2002. The Company made a significant investment in U.S. government agency securities, which was partially offset by sales of corporate securities. Holdings of corporate debt securities decreased $89.2 million during the first nine months of 2002 to reflect the Companys concerns regarding the risk-adjusted credit quality of this category of investments during the current economic downturn. The Company recorded $.7 million in net gains on securities transactions in
2002. These gains included $.6 million of recoveries on securities written off in 1998 and $.4 million on the sale of U.S. government agency securities. The Company incurred net losses on the sales of corporate securities of $.3 million.
The Companys held to maturity portfolio decreased 49.3% during the first nine months of 2002, primarily due to calls of U.S. government agency securities. During the same period, the Companys accumulated other comprehensive income increased $2.3 million due to appreciation in the value of securities available for sale, net of deferred tax.
The Companys objectives in managing the securities portfolio include maximizing yield over an entire interest rate cycle while providing liquidity. Aggregate holdings in securities at September 30, 2002 increased 11.3% from December 31, 2001, due to the significant increase in securities available for sale. Increased holdings in securities available for sale have allowed the Company to maintain an adequate level of liquidity while realizing higher yields compared to alternative investments.
The carrying value of the Companys major categories of securities are summarized in the following table (dollars in thousands):
|
|
September 30, |
|
December
31, |
|
Dollar |
|
Percent |
|
|||
Securities available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate |
|
$ |
36,531 |
|
$ |
125,728 |
|
$ |
(89,197 |
) |
(70.9 |
)% |
U.S. government agencies and corporations |
|
183,750 |
|
9,509 |
|
174,241 |
|
1,832.4 |
|
|||
States and political subdivisions |
|
2,896 |
|
411 |
|
2,485 |
|
604.6 |
|
|||
Total debt securities |
|
223,177 |
|
135,648 |
|
87,529 |
|
64.5 |
|
|||
Preferred stock and other equity securities |
|
14,649 |
|
12,199 |
|
2,450 |
|
20.1 |
|
|||
Total securities available for sale |
|
$ |
237,826 |
|
$ |
147,847 |
|
$ |
89,979 |
|
60.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Securities held to maturity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
U.S. government agencies and corporations |
|
$ |
36,199 |
|
$ |
93,524 |
|
$ |
(57,325 |
) |
(61.3 |
) |
States and political subdivisions |
|
25,155 |
|
27,444 |
|
(2,289 |
) |
(8.3 |
) |
|||
Total securities held to maturity |
|
$ |
61,354 |
|
$ |
120,968 |
|
$ |
(59,614 |
) |
(49.3 |
) |
Total loans outstanding at September 30, 2002 increased 3.2% from December 31, 2001 primarily due to increases in the home equity loan and commercial real estate loan portfolios of $22.0 million and $12.7 million, respectively, which were offset in part by a decrease of $15.2 million in the residential real estate loan portfolio. Management believes this was primarily due to the increased promotional efforts for the home equity loan product, which included very competitive rates. Total average loans outstanding increased 3.5% in the first nine months of 2002 compared to the first nine months of 2001 primarily due to a more favorable rate environment and continued economic and population growth in the Companys market area.
Balances in the Companys categories of loans are summarized in the following table (dollars in thousands):
|
|
September 30, |
|
December
31, |
|
Dollar |
|
Percent |
|
|||
Commercial |
|
$ |
333,452 |
|
$ |
323,036 |
|
$ |
10,416 |
|
3.2 |
% |
Consumer |
|
11,975 |
|
10,514 |
|
1,461 |
|
13.9 |
|
|||
Indirect automobile |
|
99,526 |
|
102,183 |
|
(2,657 |
) |
(2.6 |
) |
|||
Real estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Residential |
|
137,291 |
|
152,495 |
|
(15,204 |
) |
(10.0 |
) |
|||
Commercial |
|
208,542 |
|
195,800 |
|
12,742 |
|
6.5 |
|
|||
Home equity |
|
167,988 |
|
145,972 |
|
22,016 |
|
15.1 |
|
|||
Construction |
|
163,851 |
|
157,328 |
|
6,523 |
|
4.1 |
|
|||
Held for sale |
|
5,296 |
|
5,840 |
|
(544 |
) |
(9.3 |
) |
|||
Credit card |
|
11,801 |
|
10,437 |
|
1,364 |
|
13.1 |
|
|||
Other |
|
1,663 |
|
2,033 |
|
(370 |
) |
(18.2 |
) |
|||
Total |
|
1,141,385 |
|
1,105,638 |
|
35,747 |
|
3.2 |
|
|||
Allowance for loan losses |
|
(13,117 |
) |
(12,262 |
) |
(855 |
) |
7.0 |
|
|||
Loans, net |
|
$ |
1,128,268 |
|
$ |
1,093,376 |
|
$ |
34,892 |
|
3.2 |
|
Allowance for Loan Losses and Asset Quality. The Companys provision for loan losses is based on managements quarterly evaluations of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. In these evaluations, management considers numerous factors including, but not limited to, historical loan loss experience, the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, information about specific borrower situations and estimated collateral values and prevailing economic conditions. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available or as future events occur.
The provision for loan losses increased 148.9% for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 compared to September 30, 2001. The Companys provision for loan losses reflected managements evaluation of the loan portfolio within the context of the factors previously discussed. The increase was primarily the result of the increased levels of nonperforming loans and net loan charge-offs. Net loan charge-offs were $2.1 million and $.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The increase in net loan charge-offs was primarily due to charge-offs relating to two commercial loan relationships during the first nine months of 2002 totaling $1.6 million.
The ratio of the allowance for loan losses to total loans outstanding was 1.15% at September 30, 2002 and 1.11% at December 31, 2001. Nonperforming loans at September 30, 2002 increased 11.6% from December 31, 2001. Most of the nonperforming loan amounts relate to three commercial loan relationships at September 30, 2002 and two commercial loan relationships at December 31, 2001. The accrual status of loans past due over 90 days still on accrual is based on managements evaluation of the respective collateral values and collection efforts. Most of the nonperforming loans still on accrual are secured by real estate.
The following table presents an analysis of the Companys nonperforming loans and other real estate as of the dates indicated (dollars in thousands):
|
|
September 30, |
|
December
31, |
|
||
Loans past due over 90 days still on accrual |
|
$ |
3,505 |
|
$ |
11,338 |
|
Nonaccrual loans |
|
13,549 |
|
3,945 |
|
||
Total nonperforming loans |
|
$ |
17,054 |
|
$ |
15,283 |
|
Nonperforming loans as a percent of total loans |
|
1.5 |
% |
1.4 |
% |
||
Allowance for loan losses as a percent of nonperforming loans |
|
76.9 |
% |
80.2 |
% |
||
Other real estate |
|
$ |
1,386 |
|
$ |
1,410 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents an analysis of the Companys provision for loan losses for the periods stated (dollars in thousands):
|
|
2002 |
|
2001 |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
3rd Qtr |
|
2nd Qtr |
|
1st Qtr |
|
4th Qtr |
|
3rd Qtr |
|
|||||
Provision-quarter |
|
$ |
775 |
|
$ |
1,025 |
|
$ |
1,125 |
|
$ |
1,775 |
|
$ |
425 |
|
Provision-year to date |
|
2,925 |
|
2,150 |
|
1,125 |
|
2,950 |
|
1,175 |
|
|||||
Net chargeoffs-quarter |
|
66 |
|
1,130 |
|
874 |
|
1,797 |
|
158 |
|
|||||
Net chargeoffs-year to date |
|
2,070 |
|
2,004 |
|
874 |
|
2,087 |
|
290 |
|
|||||
Allowance at period end |
|
13,117 |
|
12,408 |
|
12,514 |
|
12,262 |
|
12,284 |
|
|||||
Allowance to period end total loans |
|
1.1 |
% |
1.1 |
% |
1.2 |
% |
1.1 |
% |
1.2 |
% |
|||||
Liability Distribution. Total liabilities at September 30, 2002 increased 6.0% from December 31, 2001. The increase in total liabilities was the result of an increase in interest-bearing deposits. Management believes the growth of NOW and savings deposits reflects the tendency of its customers to maintain a higher level of short-term liquid investments during periods of low interest rates. Management believes the growth in time deposits is directly correlated to promotional efforts and the uncertainty of financial markets.
Balances in the Companys major categories of deposits are summarized in the following table (dollars in thousands):
|
|
September 30, |
|
December
31, |
|
Dollar |
|
Percent |
|
|||
Noninterest-bearing demand |
|
$ |
144,999 |
|
$ |
148,044 |
|
$ |
(3,045 |
) |
(2.1 |
)% |
NOW |
|
255,902 |
|
251,580 |
|
4,322 |
|
1.7 |
|
|||
Money market checking |
|
227,597 |
|
228,131 |
|
(534 |
) |
(0.2 |
) |
|||
Savings |
|
346,232 |
|
309,744 |
|
36,488 |
|
11.8 |
|
|||
Time deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Less than $100,000 |
|
318,341 |
|
288,083 |
|
30,258 |
|
10.5 |
|
|||
$ 100,000 and greater |
|
99,088 |
|
84,138 |
|
14,950 |
|
17.8 |
|
|||
Total |
|
$ |
1,392,159 |
|
$ |
1,309,720 |
|
$ |
82,439 |
|
6.3 |
|
During 2002, average balances in interest-bearing deposits and noninterest-bearing demand deposits increased $73.8 million and $11.1 million, respectively, compared to the first nine months of 2001.
Shareholders equity at September 30, 2002 increased 6.9% from December 31, 2001 as a result of $14.7 million of net income for the nine-month period, reduced by dividends declared of $10.2 million and an increase in the fair value of securities available for sale of $2.3 million, net of deferred taxes. Additionally, shareholders equity was increased by a $.3 million decrease in common stock in ESOP subject to contingent repurchase obligation.
The Companys capital ratios as well as those of the Bank as of September 30, 2002 are presented below. All capital ratios are in excess of the regulatory capital requirements which call for a minimum total risk-based capital ratio of 8% for the Company and the Bank, a minimum Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 4% for the Company and the Bank and a minimum leverage ratio (3% for the most highly rated banks and bank holding companies that do not expect significant growth; all other institutions are required to maintain a minimum leverage capital ratio of 4% to 5% depending on their particular circumstances and risk and growth profiles) for the Company and the Bank. Bank holding companies and their subsidiaries are generally expected to operate at or above the minimum capital requirements. The ratios shown below are in excess of regulatory minimums and should allow the Company and the Bank to operate without significant capital adequacy concerns.
The following table sets forth the regulatory capital ratios of the Company and the Bank at September 30, 2002:
|
|
Total |
|
Tier 1 |
|
Leverage |
|
West Suburban Bancorp, Inc. |
|
12.0 |
% |
11.0 |
% |
9.6 |
% |
West Suburban Bank |
|
10.9 |
% |
10.0 |
% |
8.6 |
% |
Management has been advised that as of September 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001, the Bank was categorized as a well-capitalized institution. The Companys capital ratios were also well in excess of the required levels as of September 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001. In accordance with applicable federal regulations, the appraised fair value of the Companys common stock owned by the ESOP is included in Tier 1 capital.
Effective liquidity management ensures there is sufficient cash flow to satisfy demand for credit, deposit withdrawals and to take advantage of earnings enhancement opportunities. A large, stable core deposit base and a strong capital position are the solid foundation for the Companys liquidity position. Liquidity is enhanced by a securities portfolio structured to provide liquidity as needed. The Company also maintains lines of credit to purchase federal funds in the amount of $85 million from other financial institutions. Additionally, subject to credit underwriting, collateral, capital stock, and other requirements of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago (FHLB), the Company is able to borrow from the FHLB on a same day basis. Management estimates that as of September 30, 2002, the Company would be able to borrow approximately $92 million from the FHLB secured by real estate loans and securities. The Company manages its liquidity position through continuous monitoring of profitability trends, asset quality, interest rate sensitivity and maturity schedules of earning assets and liabilities.
Generally, the Company uses cash and cash equivalents and securities available for sale to meet its liquidity needs. As of September 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001, these liquid assets represented 19.7% and 13.2% of total assets, respectively. During 2002, the Companys cash and cash equivalents increased $22.1 million. In 2002, net cash provided by operating activities was $22.2 million, while net cash used in investing activities was $68.3 million. The net cash used in investing activities was primarily used to purchase securities available for sale and fund loan growth. Net cash flows provided by financing activities were $68.2 million, in 2002, resulting from deposit growth. Management expects operations to be a continuing source of cash flows in the future.
Net Income. The Companys net income for the first nine months of 2002 decreased 15.2% compared to the first nine months of 2001 due primarily to an increase in the provision for loan losses of $1.8 million. Net income was also affected negatively by a decrease in net interest income of $1.0 million and an increase in total noninterest expense of $1.7 million. These decreases to income and increases to expense were partially offset by an increase to total noninterest income of $.7 million and a decrease to income tax expense of $1.1 million.
Net interest income is the primary source of income for the Company. Net interest income is the difference between interest income earned on interest-earning assets and interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest income is affected by changes in the volume and yield on interest-earning assets and the volume and rates on interest-bearing liabilities. Interest-earning assets consist of federal funds sold, securities and loans. Interest-bearing liabilities primarily consist of deposits. The net interest margin is the percentage of tax equivalent net interest income to average earning assets. The Companys net interest margin for the first nine months of 2002 decreased to 4.13% compared to 4.46% for the first nine months of 2001.
Interest Income. Total interest income, on a tax equivalent basis, for the first nine months of 2002 decreased 15.6% compared to the first nine months of 2001 primarily due to declining yields from assets in the Companys loan portfolio. Average loans in 2002 increased 3.5% while the yield on the portfolio decreased 162 basis points. This was primarily due to the declining yields from assets in the Companys commercial loan portfolio, which declined
249 basis points during this period. The majority of commercial loans have adjustable rates that are tied to one of a number of rate indices. Generally, these interest rate indices have declined due to the significant reduction in interest rates during 2001. Yields on home equity lines of credit, which vary with the prime rate, decreased 255 basis points in the nine months ended September 30, 2002 compared to September 30, 2001. The average prime rate during the first nine months of 2002 was 4.75% compared to 7.50% during the first nine months of 2001.
Interest Expense. Total interest expense for the first nine months of 2002 decreased 34.1% compared to the first nine months of 2001. Interest on deposits, which accounted for substantially all of this decrease, decreased primarily due to lower market interest rates. The Company lowered interest rates on all categories of deposits in response to the significant decline in market rates. The yield on average interest-bearing deposits for the first nine months of 2002 decreased 144 basis points to 2.35% compared to 3.79% for the first nine months of 2001.
The following table reflects the impact of changes in volume and interest rates on interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities on a tax equivalent basis for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2002, as compared to the same period in 2001 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
Change due to |
|
Total |
|
|||||
|
|
Volume |
|
Rate |
|
|
||||
Interest Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Federal funds sold |
|
$ |
71 |
|
$ |
(510 |
) |
$ |
(439 |
) |
Securities |
|
1,343 |
|
(1,905 |
) |
(562 |
) |
|||
Loans |
|
1,798 |
|
(12,849 |
) |
(11,051 |
) |
|||
Total interest income |
|
3,212 |
|
(15,264 |
) |
(12,052 |
) |
|||
Interest Expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Interest-bearing deposits |
|
1,296 |
|
(12,289 |
) |
(10,993 |
) |
|||
Other interest-bearing liabilities |
|
5 |
|
(54 |
) |
(49 |
) |
|||
Total interest expense |
|
1,301 |
|
(12,343 |
) |
(11,042 |
) |
|||
Net interest income |
|
$ |
1,911 |
|
$ |
(2,921 |
) |
$ |
(1,010 |
) |
The following table presents an analysis of the Companys year-to-date average interest-earning assets, interest-bearing liabilities and noninterest-bearing demand deposits, for the quarters ended as of the dates indicated (dollars in thousands):
|
|
2002 |
|
2001 |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
September 30 |
|
June 30 |
|
March 31 |
|
December 31 |
|
September 30 |
|
|||||
Federal funds sold |
|
$ |
25,644 |
|
$ |
22,594 |
|
$ |
37,938 |
|
$ |
22,091 |
|
$ |
22,001 |
|
Securities |
|
298,696 |
|
291,227 |
|
260,335 |
|
261,330 |
|
264,150 |
|
|||||
Loans |
|
1,096,108 |
|
1,089,711 |
|
1,087,625 |
|
1,065,944 |
|
1,059,130 |
|
|||||
Total interest-earning assets |
|
$ |
1,420,448 |
|
$ |
1,403,532 |
|
$ |
1,385,898 |
|
$ |
1,349,365 |
|
$ |
1,345,281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Noninterest-bearing demand |
|
$ |
142,595 |
|
$ |
141,956 |
|
$ |
139,807 |
|
$ |
134,219 |
|
$ |
131,540 |
|
Interest-bearing |
|
1,214,708 |
|
1,196,462 |
|
1,176,777 |
|
1,141,645 |
|
1,140,950 |
|
|||||
Total deposits |
|
$ |
1,357,303 |
|
$ |
1,338,418 |
|
$ |
1,316,584 |
|
$ |
1,275,864 |
|
$ |
1,272,490 |
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
$ |
1,219,096 |
|
$ |
1,201,579 |
|
$ |
1,181,275 |
|
$ |
1,145,202 |
|
$ |
1,144,675 |
|
Provision for Loan Losses. The Companys provision for loan losses increased 148.9% in the first nine months of 2002 compared to the first nine months of 2001. A more detailed discussion concerning the allowance for loan losses is presented in the Allowance for Loan Losses and Asset Quality section of this report.
Noninterest Income. Total noninterest income increased 7.7% in the first nine months of 2002 compared to the first nine months of 2001. The improvement in total noninterest income resulted from an increase in service fees on deposit accounts of $.8 million due to customers earning lower credits on their balances as a result of the lower interest rate environment in 2002. In addition, average noninterest-bearing demand and NOW accounts, which generate most of the service charges, increased 8.4% and 11.8%, respectively, in 2002. Debit card fees increased $.2 million as a result of increased usage and the Company also experienced an increase in net gain on sale of loans held for sale of $.2 million due to higher activity resulting from a strong mortgage refinance market. Other noninterest income decreased $.3 million primarily due to reduced recoveries of prior years expenses incurred in connection with a problem loan. Improvements in noninterest income were offset by a decrease of $1.2 million in net realized gains on securities transactions due to the absence of a non-recurring gain that was realized during the 2001 period.
Noninterest Expense. Total noninterest expense increased 6.5% in the first nine months of 2002 compared to the first nine months of 2001. Advertising and promotion increased $.5 million during this period primarily due to advertisements promoting the Companys brand and image. Salaries and employee benefits increased $.7 million during this period primarily due to normal salary increases and increased staffing due to the opening of the South Elgin, Chicago Avenue (Naperville) and Oswego facilities. The South Elgin facility opened December 2001. The Chicago Avenue and Oswego facilities opened in March and June of 2002, respectively. Other noninterest expense increased $.5 million primarily due to startup expenses incurred in connection with the development and introduction of new products and services offered by the Company. Additionally, other loss expense increased primarily due to losses relating to the collection of checks presented by customers.
Income Taxes. Income tax expense decreased 13.4% in the first nine months of 2002 compared to the first nine months of 2001 primarily due to lower pre-tax income. The effective tax rates for these periods were 32.7% and 32.3%, respectively.
Net Income. The Companys net income for the third quarter of 2002 decreased 24.7% compared to the third quarter of 2001 primarily due to a $.9 million decrease in total noninterest income. Net income was affected negatively by a decrease in net interest income of $.5 million and increases in the provision for loan losses and total noninterest expense of $.4 million and $.7 million, respectively. These decreases to income and increases to expense were partially offset by a decrease to income tax expense of $.8 million.
The Companys net interest margin on a full tax-equivalent basis for the third quarter of 2002 decreased to 3.87% compared to 4.37% for the third quarter of 2001.
Interest Income. Total interest income, on a tax equivalent basis, for the third quarter of 2002 decreased 11.7% compared to the third quarter of 2001 primarily due to declining yields on the loan portfolio. Average loans for the third quarter of 2002 increased 5.9% and the average yields on the loan portfolio decreased 135 basis points compared to the third quarter of 2001. This was primarily due to the decline in yields on the commercial and home equity loan portfolios of 189 and 241 basis points, respectively. Average balances in securities for the third quarter of 2002 increased 17.9% compared to the third quarter of 2001 primarily due to increased investments the Company made in U.S. government agency securities. The yield on average interest-earning assets in the third quarter of 2002 decreased 138 basis points to 5.85% compared to 7.23% in the third quarter of 2001.
Interest Expense. Total interest expense for the third quarter of 2002 decreased 24.3% compared to the third quarter of 2001. Interest on deposits, which accounted for substantially all of this decrease, decreased primarily due to lower interest rates. The yield on interest-bearing deposits for the third quarter of 2002 decreased 103 basis points to 2.34% compared to 3.37% for the third quarter of 2001.
The following table reflects the impact of changes in volume and interest rates on interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities on a tax equivalent basis for the three-month period ended September 30, 2002, as compared to the same period in 2001 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
Change due to |
|
Total |
|
|||||
|
|
Volume |
|
Rate |
|
|
||||
Interest Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Federal funds sold |
|
$ |
55 |
|
$ |
(72 |
) |
$ |
(17 |
) |
Securities |
|
570 |
|
(791 |
) |
(221 |
) |
|||
Loans |
|
1,006 |
|
(3,649 |
) |
(2,643 |
) |
|||
Total interest income |
|
1,631 |
|
(4,512 |
) |
(2,881 |
) |
|||
Interest Expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Interest-bearing deposits |
|
619 |
|
(2,939 |
) |
(2,320 |
) |
|||
Other interest-bearing liabilities |
|
1 |
|
(58 |
) |
(57 |
) |
|||
Total interest expense |
|
620 |
|
(2,997 |
) |
(2,377 |
) |
|||
Net interest income |
|
$ |
1,011 |
|
$ |
(1,515 |
) |
$ |
(504 |
) |
The following table presents an analysis of the Companys quarterly average interest-earning assets, interest-bearing liabilities and noninterest-bearing demand deposits, for the dates indicated (dollars in thousands):
|
|
September 30, 2002 |
|
September 30, 2001 |
|
||
Federal funds sold |
|
$ |
31,645 |
|
$ |
18,563 |
|
Securities |
|
313,363 |
|
265,682 |
|
||
Loans |
|
1,136,517 |
|
1,072,915 |
|
||
Total interest-earning assets |
|
$ |
1,481,525 |
|
$ |
1,357,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits |
|
$ |
143,851 |
|
$ |
136,787 |
|
Interest-bearing deposits |
|
1,250,608 |
|
1,145,808 |
|
||
Total deposits |
|
$ |
1,394,459 |
|
$ |
1,282,595 |
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
$ |
1,253,559 |
|
$ |
1,149,706 |
|
Provision for Loan Losses. The Companys provision for loan losses increased 82.4% in the third quarter of 2002 compared to the third quarter of 2001. A more detailed discussion concerning the allowance for loan losses is presented in the Allowance for Loan Losses and Asset Quality section of this report. The provision for loan losses in the third quarter of 2002 was influenced by continued loan growth and a higher level of nonperforming loans at September 30, 2002 ($17.1 million) compared to September 30, 2001 ($3.6 million).
Noninterest Income. Total noninterest income decreased 21.5% in the third quarter of 2002 compared to the third quarter of 2001. During the third quarter of 2002 the Company experienced increases in the service fees on deposit accounts of $.4 million and debit card fees of $.1 million due to increased usage. The Company also experienced an increase in net gains on sale of loans held for sale of $.1 million due to higher activity resulting from a strong refinance market. Other noninterest income increased $.1 million primarily from income generated from new products and services offered by the Company. Improvements in noninterest income were offset by a decrease of $1.5 million in net realized gains on securities transactions due to the absence of a non-recurring gain that was realized during the 2001 period.
Noninterest Expense. Total noninterest expense increased 7.9% in the third quarter of 2002 compared to the third quarter of 2001. Salaries and employee benefits increased $.3 million primarily as a result of normal salary increases and the Chicago Avenue, South Elgin and Oswego facilities being fully operational in the 2002 period. Advertising and promotion increased $.1 million during this period primarily due to more aggressive advertising efforts. Other noninterest expense increased $.2 million primarily due to costs associated with the development of new products and services offered by the Company.
Income Taxes. Income tax expense decreased 24.7% for the third quarter of 2002 compared to the third quarter of 2001 primarily due to lower taxable income. The effective tax rate for the third quarter of both 2002 and 2001 was 34.1%.
The Company attempts to maintain a conservative posture with regard to interest rate risk by actively managing its asset/liability GAP position and monitoring the direction and magnitude of gaps and risk. The Company attempts to moderate the effects of changes in interest rates by adjusting its asset and liability mix to achieve desired relationships between rate sensitive assets and rate sensitive liabilities. Rate sensitive assets and liabilities are those instruments that reprice within a given time period. An asset or liability reprices when its interest rate is subject to change or upon maturity.
Movements in general market interest rates are a key element in changes in the net interest margin. The Companys policy is to manage its balance sheet so that fluctuations in the net interest margin are minimized regardless of the level of interest rates, although the net interest margin does vary somewhat due to managements response to increasing competition from other financial institutions.
The Company measures rate sensitivity through a net interest income analysis. The net interest income analysis measures the change in net interest income in the event of hypothetical changes in interest rates. This analysis assesses the risk of changes in net interest income in the event of a sudden and sustained 100 to 200 basis point increase or decrease in market interest rates. This analysis is subject to certain assumptions made by the Company including the following:
Balance sheet volume reflects the current balances and does not project future growth or changes. This establishes the base case from which all percentage changes are calculated.
The replacement rate for loan and deposit items that mature is the current rate offered by the Company as adjusted for the assumed rate increase or decrease. The replacement rate for securities is the current market rate as adjusted for the assumed rate increase or decrease.
The repricing rate for balance sheet data is determined by utilizing individual account statistics provided by the Companys data processing systems.
The maturity and repricing dates for balance sheet data are determined by utilizing individual account statistics provided by the Companys data processing systems.
Listed below are the Companys projected changes in net interest income over a twelve-month horizon for the various rate shock levels as of the periods indicated (dollars in thousands):
September 30, 2002 |
|
Amount |
|
Dollar |
|
Percent |
|
||
+200 basis points |
|
$ |
44,432 |
|
$ |
(10,101 |
) |
(18.5 |
)% |
+100 basis points |
|
49,578 |
|
(4,955 |
) |
(9.1 |
) |
||
Base |
|
54,533 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
-100 basis points |
|
50,537 |
|
(3,996 |
) |
(7.3 |
) |
||
-200 basis points |
|
44,815 |
|
(9,718 |
) |
(17.8 |
) |
||
December 31, 2001 |
|
Amount |
|
Dollar |
|
Percent |
|
||
+200 basis points |
|
$ |
46,016 |
|
$ |
(9,589 |
) |
(17.2 |
)% |
+100 basis points |
|
50,894 |
|
(4,711 |
) |
(8.5 |
) |
||
Base |
|
55,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
-100 basis points |
|
52,210 |
|
(3,395 |
) |
(6.1 |
) |
||
-200 basis points |
|
46,711 |
|
(8,894 |
) |
(16.0 |
) |
||
Based upon an evaluation within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report, the Companys Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer and President and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures are effective. There have been no significant changes in the Companys internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect the Companys internal controls subsequent to the date of the evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weakness.
There are no material pending legal proceedings to which the Company or the Bank are a party other than ordinary course, routine litigation incidental to their respective businesses.
None
None
None
None
a. The exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K are included with this Form 10-Q and are listed on the Index to Exhibits immediately following the Signatures and Certifications.
b. No reports on Form 8-K were filed by the Company during the three month period ended September 30, 2002.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
WEST SUBURBAN BANCORP, INC. |
|
|
(Registrant) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: November 13, 2002 |
|
|
|
/s/ Kevin J. Acker |
|
|
KEVIN J. ACKER |
|
|
CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Duane G. Debs |
|
|
DUANE G. DEBS |
|
|
PRESIDENT AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER |
I, Kevin J. Acker, certify that:
1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of West Suburban Bancorp, Inc.;
2) Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4) The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made of known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and
c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
5) The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weakness in internal controls; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and
6) The registrants other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Date: November 13, 2002 |
|
|
|
/s/ Kevin J. Acker |
|
Kevin J. Acker |
|
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |
I, Duane G. Debs, certify that:
1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of West Suburban Bancorp, Inc.;
2) Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4) The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made of known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and
c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
5) The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weakness in internal controls; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and
6) The registrants other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Date: November 13, 2002 |
|
|
|
/s/ Duane G. Debs |
|
Duane G. Debs |
|
President and Chief Financial Officer |
Exhibit |
|
Description |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
Articles of Incorporation Incorporated by reference from Exhibits 3.1 of Form S-1 of West Suburban dated November 10, 1988, under Registration No. 33-25225. |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
Form of Certificate of Amendment to Article of Incorporation Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.2 of Form S-1 of West Suburban dated November 10, 1988, under Registration No. 33-25525. |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation dated May 10, 1990 Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.3 of the Form 10-K of West Suburban dated March 28, 1991, Commission File No. 0-17609. |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation dated June 8, 1998 Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.4 of the Form 10-K of West Suburban dated March 29, 1999, Commission File No. 0-17609. |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
By-laws Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.3 of Form S-1 of West Suburban dated November 10, 1988, Registration No. 33-25225. |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
Specimen of Common Stock certificate Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.1 of the Form 10-K of West Suburban dated March 29, 1999, Commission File No. 0-17609. |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
Articles of Incorporation of West Suburban (see Exhibits 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4 and 3.5 above). |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
By-laws of West Suburban (see Exhibit 3.5 above). |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
Employment Agreement dated May 1, 1997 between West Suburban and Mr. Kevin J. Acker Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 of Form 10-Q of West Suburban dated August 14, 1997, Commission File No. 0-17609. |
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
Employment Agreement dated May 1, 1997 between West Suburban and Mr. Keith W. Acker Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 of Form 10-Q of West Suburban dated August 14, 1997, Commission File No. 0-17609. |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
Employment Agreement dated May 1, 1997 between West Suburban and Mr. Duane G. Debs Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 of Form 10-Q of West Suburban dated August 14, 1997, Commission File No. 0-17609. |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
Employment Agreement dated May 1, 1997 between West Suburban and Mr. Michael P. Brosnahan Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 of Form 10Q of West Suburban dated August 14, 1997, Commission File No. 0-17609. |
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
Form of Amended Deferred Compensation Agreement between West Suburban and Messrs. Kevin J. Acker, Keith W. Acker, Duane G. Debs and Michael P. Brosnahan Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.5 of Form 10-Q of West Suburban dated August 14, 1997, Commission File No. 0-17609. |
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
Employment Agreement dated December 24, 1998 between West Suburban and Mr. James Chippas Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.6 of Form 10-K of West Suburban dated March 29, 1999, Commission File No. 0-17609. |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
Form of Amendment to Employment Agreement dated January 21, 1999 between West Suburban and Messrs. Kevin J. Acker, Keith W. Acker, Duane G. Debs and Michael P. Brosnahan Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.7 of Form 10K of West Suburban dated March 29, 1999, Commission File No. 0-17609. |
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
Employment Agreement dated January 1, 2001 between West Suburban and Mr. Daniel P. Grotto Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.8 of Form 10-K of West Suburban dated March 27, 2002, Commission File No. 0-17609. |
|
|
|
99.1 |
|
Certification of Kevin J. Acker, Chief Executive Officer. |
|
|
|
99.2 |
|
Certification of Duane G. Debs, Chief Financial Officer |