UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
xQUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For
the quarterly period ended
MARCH
31, 2005
or
oTRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For
the transition period from ________ to ________
Commission
File Number 000-30205
CABOT
MICROELECTRONICS CORPORATION
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE |
36-4324765 |
(State
of Incorporation) |
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.) |
870
NORTH COMMONS DRIVE |
60504 |
AURORA,
ILLINOIS |
(Zip
Code) |
(Address
of principal executive offices) |
|
Registrant's
telephone number, including area code:(630)
375-6631
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days.
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in
Exchange Act Rule 12b-2 ).
As of
April 29, 2005 the Company had
24,695,264 shares of
Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share, outstanding.
CABOT
MICROELECTRONICS CORPORATION
Part
I. Financial Information |
Page |
|
|
|
Item
1. |
Financial
Statements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
and Six Months Ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March
31, 2005 and September 30, 2004 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six
Months Ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
Item
2. |
|
|
|
Condition
and Results of Operations |
14 |
|
|
|
Item
3. |
|
27 |
|
|
|
Item
4. |
|
28 |
|
|
|
Part
II. Other Information |
|
|
|
|
Item
1. |
|
28 |
|
|
|
Item
2. |
|
29 |
|
|
|
Item
4. |
|
29 |
|
|
|
Item
6. |
|
30 |
|
|
31 |
PART
I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM
1.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited
and amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
Three
Months |
|
Six
Months |
|
|
|
Ended
March 31, |
|
Ended
March 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
64,502 |
|
$ |
73,515 |
|
$ |
131,586 |
|
$ |
149,794 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
of goods sold |
|
|
34,733 |
|
|
37,366 |
|
|
68,205 |
|
|
76,392 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
profit |
|
|
29,769 |
|
|
36,149 |
|
|
63,381 |
|
|
73,402 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research
and development |
|
|
10,857 |
|
|
11,143 |
|
|
20,401 |
|
|
21,866 |
|
Selling
and marketing |
|
|
4,012 |
|
|
4,363 |
|
|
8,188 |
|
|
8,146 |
|
General
and administrative |
|
|
6,457 |
|
|
5,749 |
|
|
12,037 |
|
|
10,873 |
|
Amortization
of intangibles |
|
|
85 |
|
|
85 |
|
|
170 |
|
|
170 |
|
Total
operating expenses |
|
|
21,411 |
|
|
21,340 |
|
|
40,796 |
|
|
41,055 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
income |
|
|
8,358 |
|
|
14,809 |
|
|
22,585 |
|
|
32,347 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
income (expense), net |
|
|
458 |
|
|
(86 |
) |
|
945 |
|
|
(50 |
) |
Income
before income taxes |
|
|
8,816 |
|
|
14,723 |
|
|
23,530 |
|
|
32,297 |
|
Provision
for income taxes |
|
|
2,762 |
|
|
5,006 |
|
|
7,647 |
|
|
10,982 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income |
|
$ |
6,054 |
|
$ |
9,717 |
|
$ |
15,883 |
|
$ |
21,315 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
$ |
0.64 |
|
$ |
0.86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average basic shares outstanding |
|
|
24,642 |
|
|
24,785 |
|
|
24,634 |
|
|
24,761 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
$ |
0.64 |
|
$ |
0.85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average diluted shares outstanding |
|
|
24,685 |
|
|
24,926 |
|
|
24,698 |
|
|
24,935 |
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited
and amounts in thousands, except share amounts)
|
|
March
31, |
|
September
30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
44,077 |
|
$ |
43,308 |
|
Short-term
investments |
|
|
119,605 |
|
|
114,010 |
|
Accounts
receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts
of $433 at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March
31, 2005 and $598 at September 30, 2004 |
|
|
31,828 |
|
|
41,347 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
31,512 |
|
|
24,474 |
|
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets |
|
|
8,021 |
|
|
3,264 |
|
Deferred
income taxes |
|
|
2,665 |
|
|
3,278 |
|
Total
current assets |
|
|
237,708 |
|
|
229,681 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property,
plant and equipment, net |
|
|
128,550 |
|
|
127,794 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
1,373 |
|
|
1,373 |
|
Other
intangible assets, net |
|
|
186 |
|
|
350 |
|
Other
long-term assets |
|
|
3,797 |
|
|
4,093 |
|
Total
assets |
|
$ |
371,614 |
|
$ |
363,291 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
payable |
|
$ |
9,860 |
|
$ |
13,080 |
|
Capital
lease obligations |
|
|
1,131 |
|
|
1,272 |
|
Accrued
expenses, income taxes payable and other current
liabilities |
|
|
12,859 |
|
|
18,023 |
|
Total
current liabilities |
|
|
23,850 |
|
|
32,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
lease obligations |
|
|
5,918 |
|
|
6,385 |
|
Deferred
income taxes |
|
|
7,634 |
|
|
7,374 |
|
Deferred
compensation and other long-term liabilities |
|
|
1,524 |
|
|
1,535 |
|
Total
liabilities |
|
|
38,926 |
|
|
47,669 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments
and contingencies (Note 10) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders'
equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized:
200,000,000 shares, $0.001 par value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued: 25,175,062 shares at March 31, 2005 and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,855,495
shares at September 30, 2004 |
|
|
25
|
|
|
25
|
|
Capital
in excess of par value of common stock |
|
|
144,437 |
|
|
136,259 |
|
Retained
earnings |
|
|
201,469 |
|
|
185,586 |
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive income |
|
|
3,518 |
|
|
1,905 |
|
Unearned
compensation |
|
|
(229 |
) |
|
(153 |
) |
Treasury stock
at cost, 484,728 shares at March 31, 2005 and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
241,865
shares at September 30, 2004 |
|
|
(16,532
|
) |
|
(8,000
|
) |
Total
stockholders' equity |
|
|
332,688 |
|
|
315,622 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
liabilities and stockholders' equity |
|
$ |
371,614 |
|
$ |
363,291 |
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited
and amounts in thousands)
|
|
Six
Months Ended |
|
|
|
March
31, |
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Cash
flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income |
|
$ |
15,883 |
|
$ |
21,315 |
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
provided
by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization |
|
|
9,283 |
|
|
8,554 |
|
Loss
on equity investment |
|
|
175 |
|
|
- |
|
Noncash
compensation expense and non-employee stock options |
|
|
119 |
|
|
29 |
|
Provision
for inventory writedown |
|
|
(634 |
) |
|
(348 |
) |
Provision
for doubtful accounts |
|
|
(111 |
) |
|
7 |
|
Stock
option income tax benefits |
|
|
1,280 |
|
|
834 |
|
Deferred
income taxes |
|
|
895 |
|
|
646 |
|
Unrealized
foreign exchange (gain) |
|
|
(531 |
) |
|
(1,148 |
) |
Loss
(gain) on disposal of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
83 |
|
|
(5 |
) |
Other
non-cash expenses, net |
|
|
437 |
|
|
(18 |
) |
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
receivable |
|
|
10,450 |
|
|
827 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
(6,084 |
) |
|
1,186 |
|
Prepaid
expenses and other assets |
|
|
(673 |
) |
|
(339 |
) |
Accounts
payable, accrued liabilities and other current liabilities |
|
|
(6,018 |
) |
|
(1,481 |
) |
Income
taxes payable, deferred compensation and other noncurrent
liabilities |
|
|
(4,221 |
) |
|
(871 |
) |
Net
cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
20,333 |
|
|
29,188 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions
to property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(9,282 |
) |
|
(2,408 |
) |
Proceeds
from the sale of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
- |
|
|
13 |
|
Purchases
of equity investments |
|
|
(1,930 |
) |
|
- |
|
Purchases
of short-term investments |
|
|
(38,450 |
) |
|
(98,025 |
) |
Proceeds
from the sale of short-term investments |
|
|
32,855 |
|
|
5,000 |
|
Net
cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(16,807 |
) |
|
(95,420 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase
of common stock |
|
|
(8,532 |
) |
|
- |
|
Net
proceeds from issuance of stock |
|
|
6,008 |
|
|
2,440 |
|
Principal
payments under capital lease obligations |
|
|
(426 |
) |
|
(400 |
) |
Net
cash provided (used) by financing activities |
|
|
(2,950 |
) |
|
2,040 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect
of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
193 |
|
|
113 |
|
Increase
(decrease) in cash |
|
|
769 |
|
|
(64,079 |
) |
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
43,308 |
|
|
111,318 |
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
44,077 |
|
$ |
47,239 |
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited
and amounts in thousands, except share and per share
amounts)
1. BACKGROUND
AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
We
believe we are the leading supplier of high-performance polishing slurries used
in the manufacture of the most advanced integrated circuit ("IC'') devices
within the semiconductor industry, in a process called chemical mechanical
planarization ("CMP''). CMP is a polishing process used by IC device
manufacturers to planarize or flatten many of the multiple layers of material
that are built upon silicon wafers in the production of advanced ICs.
Planarization is a polishing process that uses CMP slurries and pads to level,
smooth and remove excess material from the surfaces of these layers, while
leaving minimal residue or defects on the surface. CMP slurries are liquid
solutions generally composed of high-purity deionized water, proprietary
chemical additives and engineered abrasives that chemically and mechanically
interact with the surface material of the IC device at an atomic level. CMP pads
are typically flat engineered “disks” that help distribute and transport the
slurry to the surface of the wafer and across the wafer.
Prior to
our initial public offering in April 2000, we operated as a division of Cabot
Corporation ("Cabot Corporation''). In September 2000 we became a wholly
independent entity upon Cabot Corporation’s spin-off of its ownership in us that
remained after the initial public offering through a dividend to its common
shareholders.
The
unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared by Cabot
Microelectronics Corporation ("Cabot Microelectronics", "the Company", "us",
"we", or "our"), pursuant to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission
("SEC”) and accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America. In the opinion of management, these unaudited consolidated financial
statements include all normal recurring adjustments necessary for the fair
presentation of Cabot Microelectronics’ financial position as of March 31, 2005,
cash flows for the six months ended March 31, 2005 and March 31, 2004 and
results of operations for the three and six months ended March 31, 2005 and
March 31, 2004. The results of operations for the three and six months ended
March 31, 2005 may not be indicative of the results to be expected for future
periods, including the fiscal year ending September 30, 2005. These unaudited
consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the
consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included in Cabot
Microelectronics’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September
30, 2004. We operate predominantly in one industry segment - the development,
manufacture, and sale of CMP slurries.
The
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Cabot Microelectronics
and its subsidiaries. All intercompany transactions and balances between the
companies have been eliminated.
2. REVISED
PRESENTATION OF AUCTION RATE SECURITIES
During
our second quarter of fiscal 2005, we concluded that our investments in auction
rate securities should be presented on our Consolidated Balance Sheet as
short-term investments. Previously, such investments had been presented as cash
and cash equivalents. Accordingly, we have revised the presentation to report
these securities as short-term investments as of March 31, 2005 and September
30, 2004 and made corresponding adjustments to the Consolidated Statements of
Cash Flows for the six months ended March 31, 2004 to reflect the gross
purchases and sales of these securities as investing activities rather than as a
component of cash and cash equivalents. The changes in presentation do not
affect our previously reported Consolidated Statements of Income or our total
current assets, total assets or cash flows from operations.
CABOT
MICROELECTRONICS CORPORATION
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Unaudited
and amounts in thousands, except share and per share
amounts)
3.
CHANGE
IN ESTIMATE
During
the second quarter of fiscal 2005 we decreased the expected useful life of
certain long-lived assets that we expect to no longer use after September 2005.
The decrease in expected useful life was a result of management’s approval of a
plan to consolidate slurry manufacturing from a smaller, legacy plant in Aurora,
Illinois to our newer, more efficient production facilities. We plan to redeploy
this legacy plant for other uses. The change in estimate was recorded
prospectively and resulted in a charge to net income of $136 (net of tax), or
$0.01 per share, for the three months ended March 31, 2005.
4. STOCK-BASED
COMPENSATION
As
currently permitted by FASB Statement No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation - Transition and Disclosure” (“SFAS 148”) and FASB Statement No.
123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (“SFAS 123”), we continue to
apply the accounting provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion Number
25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” (“APB 25”), and related
interpretations, with regard to the measurement of compensation cost for options
granted under our Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) and shares issued under our
Employee Stock Purchase Plan. No employee compensation expense has been recorded
as all options granted had an exercise price equal to the market value of the
underlying common stock on the date of grant. In addition, no compensation
expense has been recorded for purchases under our Employee Stock Purchase Plan
in accordance with APB 25. Had expense been recognized using the fair value
method described in SFAS 123, using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, we
would have reported the following results of operations:
|
|
Three
Months |
|
Six
Months |
|
|
|
Ended
March 31, |
|
Ended
March 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income, as reported |
|
$ |
6,054 |
|
$ |
9,717 |
|
$ |
15,883 |
|
$ |
21,315 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deduct:
total stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
determined
under the fair value method, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
net
of tax |
|
|
(12,474 |
) |
|
(5,621 |
) |
|
(
23,920 |
) |
|
(
10,451 |
) |
Pro
forma net income |
|
$ |
(6,420 |
) |
$ |
4,096 |
|
$ |
(8,037 |
) |
$ |
10,864 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings
per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
- as reported |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
$ |
0.64 |
|
$ |
0.86 |
|
Basic
- pro forma |
|
$ |
(0.26 |
) |
$ |
0.17 |
|
$ |
(0.33 |
) |
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
- as reported |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
$ |
0.64 |
|
$ |
0.85 |
|
Diluted
- pro forma |
|
$ |
(0.26 |
) |
$ |
0.16 |
|
$ |
(0.33 |
) |
$ |
0.44 |
|
CABOT
MICROELECTRONICS CORPORATION
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Unaudited
and amounts in thousands, except share and per share
amounts)
In the
fourth fiscal quarter of 2004 we revised certain assumptions used in the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model and have adjusted the previously reported
data for the three and six months ended March 31, 2004 to conform to the current
period presentation. The data previously reported for these periods were as
follows: total stock-based compensation expense determined under the fair value
method, net of tax were $5,096 and $9,625, pro forma net income were $4,621 and
$11,690, pro forma basic earnings per share were $0.19 and $0.47, and pro forma
diluted earnings per share were $0.19 and $0.47 for the three and six months
ended March 31, 2004, respectively.
On
September 27, 2004, to address certain issues arising pursuant to the revision
of SFAS 123 (at the time proposed) and as permitted by the Plan, the
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors accelerated to September 1,
2005, the vesting of those stock options granted to employees, officers and
directors under the Plan, prior to September 27, 2004 that had an option price
equal to or greater than the fair market value of the shares of the Company on
September 27, 2004 ($34.65), through amendment made and effective as of
September 27, 2004 to the grant agreements for such stock options. Approximately
1.3 million options had option prices of greater than $34.65 (“out-of-the-money
options”), and therefore are subject to the acceleration provision, and as a
result will become exercisable as of September 1, 2005. Since the revision to
SFAS 123 will require us to recognize share-based compensation expense in our
income statement for all unvested options as of October 1, 2005, including those
options that are out-of-the-money, the Compensation Committee decided to
accelerate the vesting of these approximately 1.3 million options in order to
mitigate the associated future share-based compensation expense. The
Compensation Committee chose to delay the accelerated vesting of these options
to September 1, 2005 to preserve, until such time, the employee retention
benefit of these stock options.
The
increase in pro forma stock-based compensation expense for the three and six
months ended March 31, 2005 compared to the three and six months ended March 31,
2004 is primarily attributable to accelerated vesting of the 1.3 million
options. The costs presented in the preceding table may not be representative of
the total effects on reported income for future years. Factors that may also
impact future years include any changes to our historical approaches to
long-term incentives and determining fair value, as well as, the attribution of
the awards to the service period, the vesting period of stock options, timing of
additional grants of stock option awards and number of shares granted for future
awards. For additional information regarding share-based compensation, see Note
11 to the consolidated financial statements.
CABOT
MICROELECTRONICS CORPORATION
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Unaudited
and amounts in thousands, except share and per share
amounts)
5. EARNINGS
PER SHARE
FASB
Statement No. 128 "Earnings per Share" requires companies to provide a
reconciliation of the numerator and denominator of the basic and diluted
earnings per share computations. Basic and diluted earnings per share were
calculated as follows:
|
|
Three
Months |
|
Six
Months |
|
|
|
Ended
March 31, |
|
Ended
March 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings
available to common shares |
|
$ |
6,054 |
|
$ |
9,717 |
|
$ |
15,883 |
|
$ |
21,315 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average common shares |
|
|
24,641,579 |
|
|
24,785,052 |
|
|
24,633,530 |
|
|
24,761,317 |
|
(Denominator
for basic calculation) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based
compensation |
|
|
43,421 |
|
|
140,707 |
|
|
64,677 |
|
|
173,446 |
|
Diluted
weighted average common shares |
|
|
24,685,000 |
|
|
24,925,759 |
|
|
24,698,207 |
|
|
24,934,763 |
|
(Denominator
for diluted calculation) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings
per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
$ |
0.64 |
|
$ |
0.86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
$ |
0.64 |
|
$ |
0.85 |
|
For the three
months ended March 31, 2004 and 2005, 3.4 million and 4.1 million shares
attributable to outstanding stock options were excluded from the calculation of
diluted earnings per share because their inclusion would have been
anti-dilutive. For the six months ended March 31, 2004 and 2005, 1.9 million and
4.1 million shares attributable to outstanding stock options were excluded from
the calculation of diluted earnings per share for the same reason.
CABOT
MICROELECTRONICS CORPORATION
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Unaudited
and amounts in thousands, except share and per share
amounts)
6. COMPREHENSIVE
INCOME
The
components of comprehensive income are as follows:
|
|
Three
Months |
|
Six
Months |
|
|
|
Ended
March 31, |
|
Ended
March 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Income |
|
$ |
6,054 |
|
$ |
9,717 |
|
$ |
15,883 |
|
$ |
21,315 |
|
Other
comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
unrealized gain on derivative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
instruments |
|
|
8 |
|
|
9 |
|
|
17 |
|
|
18 |
|
Foreign
currency translation adjustment |
|
|
(2,046 |
) |
|
1,225 |
|
|
1,596 |
|
|
3,446 |
|
Total
comprehensive income |
|
$ |
4,016 |
|
$ |
10,951 |
|
$ |
17,496 |
|
$ |
24,779 |
|
7. INVENTORIES
Inventories
consisted of the following:
|
|
March
31, |
|
September
30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raw
materials |
|
$ |
20,619 |
|
$ |
14,639 |
|
Work
in process |
|
|
1,027 |
|
|
1,048 |
|
Finished
goods |
|
|
9,866 |
|
|
8,787 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
31,512 |
|
$ |
24,474 |
|
CABOT
MICROELECTRONICS CORPORATION
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Unaudited
and amounts in thousands, except share and per share
amounts)
8.
GOODWILL
AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Goodwill
of $1,373, as of March 31, 2005, was unchanged from our fiscal year ended
September 30, 2004.
The
components of intangible assets are as follows:
|
|
March
31, 2005 |
|
September
30, 2004 |
|
|
|
Gross
Carrying |
|
Accumulated |
|
Gross
Carrying |
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
Amortization |
|
Amount |
|
Amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade
secrets and know-how |
|
$ |
2,550 |
|
$ |
2,486 |
|
$ |
2,550 |
|
$ |
2,360 |
|
Distribution
rights, customer lists and other |
|
|
1,101 |
|
|
979 |
|
|
1,095 |
|
|
935 |
|
Total
intangible assets |
|
$ |
3,651 |
|
$ |
3,465 |
|
$ |
3,645 |
|
$ |
3,295 |
|
Amortization
expense of intangible assets was $85 and $170 for the three and six months ended
March 31, 2005, respectively. Estimated future amortization expense for the
remaining six months of fiscal year 2005 is $85 and zero
thereafter.
9. ACCRUED
EXPENSES, INCOME TAXES PAYABLE AND OTHER CURRENT
LIABILITIES
Accrued
expenses, income taxes payable and other current liabilities consisted of the
following:
|
|
March
31, |
|
September
30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued
compensation |
|
$ |
7,690 |
|
$ |
10,254 |
|
Raw
materials accruals |
|
|
1,199 |
|
|
1,726 |
|
Warranty
accrual |
|
|
739 |
|
|
952 |
|
Due
to equity method investee |
|
|
- |
|
|
1,930 |
|
Income
taxes payable |
|
|
- |
|
|
522 |
|
Other |
|
|
3,231 |
|
|
2,639 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
12,859 |
|
$ |
18,023 |
|
CABOT
MICROELECTRONICS CORPORATION
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Unaudited
and amounts in thousands, except share and per share
amounts)
10. CONTINGENCIES
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
We
periodically become subject to legal proceedings in the ordinary course of
business. We are not currently involved in any legal proceedings that we believe
will have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of
operations, or cash flows.
PRODUCT
WARRANTIES
We
maintain a warranty reserve that reflects management's best estimate of the cost
to replace product that does not meet customers’ specifications and performance
requirements, and related costs. The warranty reserve is based upon a historical
product return rate applied against sales made in the current quarterly period,
plus an additional amount related to any specific known conditions or
circumstances. Adjustments to the warranty reserve are recorded in cost of goods
sold. Our warranty reserve requirements decreased during the first six months of
fiscal 2005 as follows:
Balance
as of September 30, 2004 |
|
$ |
952 |
|
Additions
charged to expense |
|
|
- |
|
Deductions |
|
|
(213 |
) |
Balance
as of March 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
739 |
|
INDEMNIFICATION
DISCLOSURE
In the
normal course of business, we are a party to a variety of agreements pursuant to
which we may be obligated to indemnify the other party with respect to certain
matters. Generally, these obligations arise in the context of agreements entered
into by us, under which we customarily agree to hold the other party harmless
against losses arising from items such as a breach of certain representations
and covenants including title to assets sold, certain intellectual property
rights and certain environmental matters. These terms are common in the industry
in which we conduct business. In each of these circumstances, payment by us is
subject to certain monetary and other limitations and is conditioned on the
other party making an adverse claim pursuant to the procedures specified in the
particular agreement, which typically allow us to challenge the other party's
claims.
We
evaluate estimated losses for such indemnifications under SFAS No. 5,
"Accounting for Contingencies" as interpreted by FASB Interpretation No. 45,
"Guarantor's Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including
Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others" ("FIN 45"). We consider such
factors as the probability of an unfavorable outcome and the ability to make a
reasonable estimate of the amount of loss. To date, we have not encountered
material costs as a result of such obligations and as of March 31, 2005, have
not recorded any liabilities related to such indemnifications in our financial
statements as we do not believe the likelihood of a material obligation is
probable.
CABOT
MICROELECTRONICS CORPORATION
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Unaudited
and in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
11. EFFECTS
OF RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In
December 2004 the FASB issued Statement No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based
Payment” (“SFAS 123R”), which replaces FASB Statement No. 123, “Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation,” (“SFAS 123”) and supersedes Accounting Principles
Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.” SFAS 123R
requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee
stock options, to be recognized in the income statement based on their fair
values, and the pro forma disclosure alternative is no longer allowable under
SFAS 123R. In March 2005 the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) issued
Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 which provided further clarification on the
implementation of SFAS 123R which was originally scheduled to be effective as of
the beginning of the first interim or annual reporting period beginning after
June 15, 2005. In April 2005 the SEC delayed the effective date for SFAS 123R
until annual periods beginning on or after June 15, 2005 and, therefore, SFAS
123R will now be effective for us beginning with the first quarter of fiscal
2006. Prior to this, we anticipated recognizing approximately $11,000 of pre-tax
share based compensation expense in our fourth quarter of fiscal 2005, primarily
related to the approximately 1.3 million options, the vesting of which we
accelerated to September 1, 2005, plus a prorated portion of annual expense
related to stock option grants made in fiscal 2005, including our normal annual
employee stock option grant made in December 2004. However, due to the delay in
effective date for SFAS 123R, we no longer expect to recognize this expense in
the income statement for fiscal 2005. We are currently evaluating the impact and
implementation of SFAS 123R, which we believe will have a material impact on our
consolidated results of operations and earnings per share. Using our current
fair value methodology, the Black-Scholes model, we expect to recognize
approximately $11,000 of pre-tax share-based compensation for full fiscal year
2006, assuming we apply our historical approaches to long-term incentives and
determining fair value. Other factors may also impact future share-based
compensation expense including the attribution of the awards to the service
period, the vesting period of stock options, the timing and number of additional
grants of stock option awards, fluctuations in and volatility of our stock
price, expected term of the grants and the risk-free rate of
interest.
In March
2005 the FASB issued Interpretation No. 47, “Accounting for Conditional Asset
Retirement Obligations” (“FIN 47”) which is effective for fiscal years ending
after December 15, 2005 and is an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 143,
“Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations”. FIN 47 requires recognition of a
liability for the fair value of a conditional asset retirement obligation when
incurred if the liability’s fair value can be reasonably estimated. We do not
expect the adoption of FIN 47 to have a material impact on our consolidated
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In
November 2004, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 151, “Inventory Costs, an
amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4” (“SFAS 151”), which adopts wording from the
International Accounting Standards Board’s (“IASB”) IAS 2, “Inventories”, in an
effort to improve the comparability of cross-border financial reporting. The new
standard indicates that abnormal freight, handling costs and wasted materials
are required to be treated as current period charges rather than as a portion of
inventory costs. Additionally, the standard clarifies that fixed production
overhead should be allocated based on the normal capacity of a production
facility. SFAS 151 is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005.
We do not expect the adoption of SFAS 151 to have a material impact on our
consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash
flows.
In
December 2004, the FASB issued FASB Statement No 153, “Exchanges on Nonmonetary
Assets, an amendment of APB Opinion No. 29, Accounting for Nonmonetary
Transactions” (”SFAS 153”), as part of its short-term international convergence
project with the IASB. Under SFAS 153, nonmonetary exchanges are required to be
accounted for at fair value, recognizing any gains or losses, if their fair
value is determinable within reasonable limits and the transaction has
commercial substance. SFAS 153 is effective for fiscal years beginning after
June 15, 2005. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS 153 will have a material
impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash
flows.
ITEM
2. MANAGEMENT'S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
The
following "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations", as well as disclosures included elsewhere in this Form
10-Q, include "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. This Act provides a "safe harbor" for
forward-looking statements to encourage companies to provide prospective
information about themselves so long as they identify these statements as
forward-looking and provide meaningful cautionary statements identifying
important factors that could cause actual results to differ from the projected
results. All statements other than statements of historical fact we make in this
Form 10-Q are forward-looking. In particular, the statements herein regarding
future sales and operating results, company and industry growth and trends,
growth of the markets in which the company participates, or plans to
participate, international events, product performance, new product
introductions, development of new products and technologies, the construction of
new facilities by the company and statements preceded by, followed by or that
include the words "intends," "estimates," "plans," "believes," "expects,"
"anticipates," "should," "could," or similar expressions, are forward-looking
statements. Forward-looking statements reflect our current expectations and are
inherently uncertain. Our actual results may differ significantly from our
expectations. We assume no obligation to update this forward-looking
information. The section entitled "Factors Affecting Future Operating Results"
describes some, but not all, of the factors that could cause these differences.
This section, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations”, should be read in conjunction with Cabot
Microelectronics’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September
30, 2004 including the consolidated financial statements and related notes
thereto.
SECOND
FISCAL QUARTER OVERVIEW
We
believe we are the leading supplier of high-performance polishing slurries used
in the manufacture of the most advanced integrated circuit ("IC'') devices
within the semiconductor industry, in a process called chemical mechanical
planarization ("CMP''). CMP is a polishing process used by IC device
manufacturers to planarize or flatten many of the multiple layers of material
that are built upon silicon wafers in the production of advanced ICs. We
develop, produce and sell CMP slurries for polishing copper, tungsten and oxide
in IC devices, and also for polishing magnetic heads and the coatings on disks
in hard disk drives. In addition, we are developing CMP polishing pads, which
are used in conjunction with slurries in the CMP process. Demand for our
products is primarily based on the number of wafers, or “wafer starts”, of these
advanced devices produced by semiconductor manufacturers.
Revenue
for our second fiscal quarter was $64.5 million, which represents a 3.8%
decrease from the previous fiscal quarter, and a 12.3% decrease compared to the
same quarter in our last fiscal year. We believe the revenue decline primarily
reflects continued weakness in portions of the semiconductor industry that also
adversely impacted our revenue in our first quarter of fiscal 2005, as a number
of our customers appeared to reduce wafer starts in an effort to reduce excess
finished goods inventories of certain IC devices. Although some semiconductor
industry experts have commented that they expect some recovery in the
semiconductor industry later in calendar year 2005, there are several factors
that make it difficult for us to predict future revenue trends for our business,
including: the cyclical nature of, and continued uncertainty in, the
semiconductor industry; short order to delivery time and the
associated lack of visibility to future customer orders; and the
effect of competition on pricing.
Gross
profit expressed as a percentage of revenue was 46.2%, which represents a
decrease from the 50.1% reported for the previous fiscal quarter, and a decrease
from 49.2% for the same quarter in the last fiscal year. Compared to the
previous quarter, the decrease in gross margin as a percentage of revenue was
primarily driven by a lower valued product mix, and to a lesser extent, lower
utilization of our manufacturing capacity and selected price reductions. These
adverse effects were partially offset by higher manufacturing yields. We
continue to expect our gross margin as a percentage of revenue to be 48%, plus
or minus 2%. Diluted earnings per share was $0.25, which represents a decrease
from both the $0.40 reported in the previous quarter and $0.39 reported in the
second quarter of fiscal 2004, primarily as a result of the lower level of
revenue described above.
In
December 2004 the FASB issued Statement No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based
Payment” (“SFAS 123R”), which requires all share-based payments to employees,
including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the income
statement based on their fair values, and the pro forma disclosure alternative
is no longer allowable under SFAS 123R. In April 2005 the SEC delayed the
effective date for SFAS 123R and, therefore, SFAS 123R will now be effective for
us beginning with the first quarter of fiscal 2006. Prior to this, we
anticipated recognizing approximately $11.0 million of pre-tax share based
compensation expense in our fourth quarter of fiscal 2005, primarily related to
the approximately 1.3 million options, the vesting of which we accelerated to
September 1, 2005, which we no longer expect to recognize in the income
statement for fiscal 2005. However, we continue to anticipate recognizing
approximately $11.0 million of pre-tax share-based compensation for full fiscal
year 2006, assuming we apply our historical approaches to long-term incentives
and determining fair value utilizing the Black-Scholes option pricing
model.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
THREE
MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2005 VERSUS THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
2004
REVENUE
Revenue
was $64.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005, which represented a
12.3%, or $9.0 million, decrease from the three months ended March 31, 2004. Of
this decrease, $7.6 million was due to a decrease in sales volume and $1.4
million was due to a decrease in weighted average selling price, primarily
resulting from selected price reductions. We expect pricing pressure to continue
due to customer desires to gain purchasing leverage and lower their cost of
ownership. Revenue would have been $0.4 million lower had the average exchange
rates for the Japanese Yen and Euro during the period held constant with the
prior year’s second fiscal quarter average rates.
COST
OF GOODS SOLD
Total
cost of goods sold was $34.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005,
which represented a decrease of 7.0% or $2.6 million from the three months ended
March 31, 2004. Cost of goods sold decreased by approximately $3.8 million due
to lower sales volume, which was partially offset by a $1.2 million increase in
average costs. The increase in average costs was primarily related to lower
utilization of our manufacturing capacity due to the lower level of sales and
higher fixed costs, which were partially offset by higher manufacturing
yields.
Fumed
metal oxides, such as fumed silica and fumed alumina, are significant raw
materials we use in many of our CMP slurries. In an effort to mitigate our risk
to rising raw material costs and to increase supply assurance and quality
performance measures, we have entered into multi-year supply agreements with
Cabot Corporation, who supplies us with fumed silica and fumed alumina, and
other suppliers. We purchase fumed alumina under a fumed metal oxide agreement
with Cabot Corporation that is due to expire in June 2005, and a fumed alumina
supply agreement that is due to expire in December 2006 and may be renewed for
another five-year term. The fumed alumina supply agreement provides that the
price Cabot Corporation charges us for fumed alumina is based on all of its
fixed and variable costs for producing the fumed alumina, its capital costs for
an agreed upon capacity expansion, an agreed upon rate of return on investment
and incentive payments if they produce above a threshold level of fumed alumina
per year that meets our specifications. We purchase fumed silica under a fumed
silica supply agreement with Cabot Corporation, which provides for the cost of
fumed silica to increase approximately 4% over the initial six-year term of the
agreement, and in some circumstances is subject to certain inflation adjustments
and certain shared cost savings adjustments resulting from our joint efforts.
This agreement runs through December 2009, and will automatically renew unless
either party gives certain notice of non-renewal.
Our need
for additional quantities or different kinds of key raw materials in the future
has required, and will continue to require, that we enter into new supply
arrangements with third parties. Future arrangements may result in costs which
are different from those in the existing agreements. We also expect to continue
to invest in our operations excellence initiative to improve product quality,
reduce variability and improve product yields in our manufacturing
process.
GROSS
PROFIT
Our gross
profit as a percentage of revenue was 46.2%, for the three months ended March
31, 2005 as compared to 49.2% for the three months ended March 31, 2004. The 3.0
percentage point decrease in gross profit expressed as a percentage of revenue
resulted primarily from a lower valued product mix, lower capacity utilization
and selected price reductions which were partially offset by improved
manufacturing yields. We continue to expect that our gross profit as a
percentage of revenue will be in the range of 48%, plus or minus
2%.
RESEARCH
AND DEVELOPMENT
Research
and development expenses were $10.9 million in the three months ended March 31,
2005, which represented a decrease of 2.6%, or $0.3 million, from the three
months ended March 31, 2004. Research and development expense decreased
primarily due to a reduction of $0.6 million in clean room materials and
laboratory supplies and a reduction of $0.4 million in technical service and
analysis fees. These decreases were partially offset by an increase in staffing
related expenses of $0.7 million. Research and development efforts were mainly
related to formulation and evaluation of new and enhanced CMP slurry products,
research related to fundamental technology such as advanced chemistry and
particle technology, new and enhanced CMP polishing pad technology and
evaluation of new polishing applications outside of IC devices.
During
the second fiscal quarter of 2005 we made progress on the construction of our
new Asia Pacific technology center located adjacent to our existing
manufacturing facility in Geino, Japan. The new 18,000 square foot facility will
provide polishing, metrology and product development capabilities and is
expected to become operational in October 2005.
SELLING
AND MARKETING
Selling
and marketing expenses were $4.0 million in the three months ended March 31,
2005, which represented a decrease of 8.0%, or $0.4 million, from the three
months ended March 31, 2004. Selling and marketing expense decreased primarily
due to lower consulting fees of $0.2 million and lower product sample costs of
$0.2 million.
GENERAL
AND ADMINISTRATIVE
General
and administrative expenses were $6.5 million in the three months ended March
31, 2005, which represented an increase of 12.3%, or $0.7 million, from the
three months ended March 31, 2004. The increase in general and administrative
expense resulted from an increase of $0.4 million in professional fees primarily
related to the implementation of Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404 and an increase of
$0.4 million in staffing related costs.
AMORTIZATION
OF INTANGIBLES
Amortization
of intangibles was $0.1 million for both the three months ended March 31, 2005
and 2004.
OTHER
INCOME AND EXPENSE, NET
Other
income was $0.5 million in the three months ended March 31, 2005, compared to
other expense of $0.1 for the three months ended March 31, 2004. The increase in
other income is mainly due to higher interest income, which is attributable to
higher interest rates and an increased balance of cash and short-term
investments.
PROVISION
FOR INCOME TAXES
Our
effective income tax rate was 31.3% for three months ended March 31, 2005 and
34.0% for three months ended March 31, 2004. The decrease in the effective tax
rate was primarily attributable to increased tax exempt interest income.
We expect our income tax rate for full fiscal year 2005 to be
32.5%.
NET
INCOME
Net
income was $6.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005, which
represented a decrease of 37.7%, or $3.7 million, from the three months ended
March 31, 2004 as a result of the factors discussed above.
SIX
MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2005 VERSUS SIX MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
2004
REVENUE
Revenue
was $131.6 million for the six months ended March 31, 2005, which represented a
12.2%, or $18.2 million, decrease from the six months ended March 31, 2004. Of
this decrease, $12.7 million was due to a decrease in sales volume and $5.5
million was due to a decrease in weighted average selling price resulting from
selected price reductions. We expect
pricing pressure to continue due to customer desires to gain purchasing leverage
and lower their cost of ownership. Revenue would have been $0.7 million
lower had the average exchange rates for the Japanese Yen and Euro during the
six-month period held constant with the prior year’s six-month average
rates.
COST
OF GOODS SOLD
Total
cost of goods sold was $68.2 million for the six months ended March 31, 2005,
which represented a decrease of 10.7% or $8.2 million from the six months ended
March 31, 2004. Of this decrease, $6.5 million was due to a decrease in volume
and $1.7 million was due to lower average costs per gallon resulting from
improved manufacturing yields partially offset by higher fixed
costs.
GROSS
PROFIT
Our gross
profit as a percentage of revenue was 48.2% for the six months ended March 31,
2005, as compared to 49.0% for the six months ended March 31, 2004. The 0.8
percentage point decrease in gross profit expressed as a percentage of revenue
resulted primarily from a lower valued product mix, lower capacity utilization
and selected price reductions which were partially offset by improved
manufacturing yields.
RESEARCH
AND DEVELOPMENT
Research
and development expenses were $20.4 million in the six months ended March 31,
2005, which represented a decrease of 6.7%, or $1.5 million, from the six months
ended March 31, 2004. Research and development expense decreased primarily due
to a reduction of $1.8 million in clean room materials and laboratory supplies
and a reduction of $0.8 million in technical service and analysis fees. These
decreases were partially offset by an increase in staffing related expenses of
$0.7 million and an increase in depreciation expense of $0.5 million. Research
and development efforts were mainly related to formulation and evaluation of new
and enhanced CMP slurry products, research related to fundamental technology
such as advanced chemistry and particle technology, new and enhanced CMP
polishing pad technology and evaluation of new polishing applications outside of
IC devices.
SELLING
AND MARKETING
Selling
and marketing expenses of $8.2 million in the six months ended March 31, 2005
were essentially unchanged from the six months ended March 31, 2004. Increased
staffing costs of $0.8 million were offset by lower consulting fees of $0.4
million and lower product sample costs of $0.4 million.
GENERAL
AND ADMINISTRATIVE
General
and administrative expenses were $12.0 million in the six months ended March 31,
2005, which represented an increase of 10.7 %, or $1.2 million, from the six
months ended March 31, 2004. The increase resulted primarily from an increase in
staffing related costs of $1.0 million and higher professional fees of $0.2
million.
AMORTIZATION
OF INTANGIBLES
Amortization
of intangibles was $0.2 million for both the six months ended March 31, 2005 and
2004.
OTHER
INCOME AND EXPENSE, NET
Other
income was $0.9 million in the six months ended March 31, 2005, compared to
other expense of $0.1 for the six months ended March 31, 2004. The increase in
other income is primarily due to higher interest income which is attributable to
higher interest rates and an increased balance of cash and short-term
investments.
PROVISION
FOR INCOME TAXES
Our
effective income tax rate was 32.5% for six months ended March 31, 2005 and
34.0% for six months ended March 31, 2004. The decrease in the effective tax
rate was primarily attributable to increased tax exempt interest
income.
NET
INCOME
Net
income was $15.9 million for the six months ended March 31, 2005, which
represented a decrease of 25.5%, or $5.4 million, from the six months ended
March 31, 2004 as a result of the factors discussed above.
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
We had
cash flows from operating activities of $20.3 million in the six months ended
March 31, 2005 and $29.2 million in the six months ended March 31, 2004. Our
cash provided by operating activities for the six months ended March 31, 2005
originated from net income from operations of $15.9 million and non-cash items
of $11.0 million, which were partially offset by a net increase in working
capital of $6.6 million. The net increase in working capital primarily reflects
an increase in raw material inventories to mitigate supply risk, a decrease in
income taxes payable due to the timing, as well as the statutory calculation
method required for the payment of, estimated federal income taxes and a
decrease in accrued compensation mostly related to the payout of annual bonuses
in December 2005. These increases in working capital were partially offset by a
decrease in accounts receivable due to the lower level of sales.
In the
six months ended March 31, 2005, cash flows used in investing activities were
$16.8 million, of which $9.3 million was used mainly for purchases of equipment
for our polishing clean room and metrology facility and for construction of our
new Asia Pacific Technology Center, and $5.6 million was used for net purchases
of short-term auction rate securities investments. In addition, in the fourth
quarter of fiscal 2004 we acquired a minority equity ownership interest in
NanoProducts Corporation in exchange for $3.8 million, of which we made an
initial payment of $1.8 million in July 2004 and the final payment of $1.9
million in December 2004. Capital spending for full fiscal year 2005 is
anticipated to be approximately $33.0 million, which includes the construction
of our Asia Pacific technology center in Geino, Japan. In the six months ended
March 31, 2004, cash flows used in investing activities were $95.4 million, of
which $93.0 million was used for net purchases of short-term auction rate
securities investments, which were previously presented as cash and cash
equivalents (see Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements). In addition,
capital spending was $2.4 million, primarily for the purchase of
production-related equipment for our Aurora, Illinois facilities and equipment
for our polishing clean room and metrology facility.
In the
six months ended March 31, 2005, cash flows used in financing activities of $3.0
million resulted from the repurchase of $8.5 million of common stock and
principal payments of $0.4 million made under capital lease obligations. These
outflows were partially offset by the issuance of common stock of $6.0 million
primarily related to the exercise of stock options under our equity incentive
plan and purchases under our employee stock purchase plan. In the six months
ended March 31, 2004, cash flows from financing activities were $2.0 million,
primarily resulting from the exercise of stock options under our equity
incentive plan and purchases under our employee stock purchase plan, partially
offset by principal payments made under capital lease obligations.
In July
2004 our Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program for up to
$25.0 million of our outstanding common stock under which shares are repurchased
from time to time, depending on market conditions, in open market transactions,
at management’s discretion. The plan is primarily intended to diminish earnings
dilution from the issuance of stock from the exercise of stock options under our
equity incentive plan and purchases under our employee stock purchase plan. We
fund share repurchases from our existing cash and short-term investments balance
and the program may be suspended or terminated at any time, at the Company’s
discretion.
In July
2001 we entered into a $75.0 million unsecured revolving credit and term loan
facility with a group of commercial banks, and in February 2002 and August 2003,
this agreement was amended with no material changes in terms. In November 2003,
the then existing agreement was terminated and replaced with an amended and
restated unsecured revolving credit facility of $50.0 million with an option to
increase the facility by up to $30.0 million. Under this agreement, which
terminates in November 2006, but can be renewed for two one-year terms, interest
accrues on any outstanding balance at either the institution’s base rate or the
eurodollar rate plus an applicable margin. A non-use fee also accrues. Loans
under this facility are anticipated to be used primarily for general corporate
purposes, including working capital and capital expenditures. The credit
agreement also contains various covenants. No amounts are currently outstanding
under this credit facility and we believe we are currently in compliance with
the covenants.
We
believe that cash generated by our operations and available borrowings under our
revolving credit facility will be sufficient to fund our operations, expected
capital expenditures and share repurchases for the foreseeable future. However,
we plan to expand our business and continue to improve our technology, and to do
so, we may be required to raise additional funds in the future through public or
private equity or debt financing, strategic relationships or other
arrangements.
OFF-BALANCE
SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
At March
31, 2005 and September 30, 2004, we did not have any unconsolidated entities or
financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance
or special purpose entities, which might have been established for the purpose
of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements.
TABULAR
DISCLOSURE OF CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
The
following summarizes our contractual obligations at March 31, 2005 and the
effect such obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flow in
future periods.
CONTRACTUAL
OBLIGATIONS |
|
|
|
Less
Than |
|
1-3 |
|
4-5 |
|
After
5 |
|
(In
millions) |
|
Total |
|
1
Year |
|
Years |
|
Years |
|
Years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
lease obligations |
|
$ |
7.0 |
|
$ |
1.1 |
|
$ |
3.1 |
|
$ |
2.5 |
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
Operating
leases |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
0.0 |
|
Purchase
obligations |
|
|
52.2 |
|
|
37.3 |
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
1.2 |
|
Other
long-term liabilities |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
1.5 |
|
Total
contractual obligations |
|
$ |
61.6 |
|
$ |
38.9 |
|
$ |
13.9 |
|
$ |
5.8 |
|
$ |
3.0 |
|
CAPITAL
LEASE OBLIGATIONS
Since
December 2001 we have operated under a fumed alumina supply agreement with Cabot
Corporation, under which Cabot Corporation expanded its capacity in Tuscola,
Illinois for the manufacture of fumed alumina. Payments made by us with respect
to capital costs for the facility have been treated as a capital lease for
accounting purposes and the present value of the minimum quarterly payments of
approximately $0.3 million resulted in a $9.8 million lease obligation and $9.8
million related leased asset. The agreement has an initial five-year term, which
expires in 2006, but we can choose to renew the agreement for another five-year
term. We also can choose to not renew the agreement subject to certain terms and
conditions and the payment of certain costs, after the initial five-year
term.
OPERATING
LEASES
We lease
certain vehicles, warehouse facilities, office space, machinery and equipment
under cancelable and noncancelable operating leases, most of which expire within
ten years and may be renewed by us.
PURCHASE
OBLIGATIONS
Purchase
obligations include our take-or-pay arrangements with suppliers, and purchase
orders and other obligations entered into in the normal course of business
regarding the purchase of goods and services. In the fourth quarter of fiscal
2003, we recorded a $2.0 million liability for a raw material supply agreement
for a polishing pad technology that was previously under development, but is no
longer being pursued. Our remaining obligation with respect to this agreement is
$1.2 million which is recorded in current liabilities and shown in the preceding
table under purchase obligations.
We
operate under a fumed silica supply agreement with Cabot Corporation under which
we are obligated to purchase at least 90% of our six-month volume forecast and
to pay for the shortfall if we purchase less than that amount. This agreement
has an initial six-year term, which expires in December 2009 and will
automatically renew unless either party gives certain notice of non-renewal. We
currently anticipate meeting minimum forecasted purchase volume requirements. We
also operate under the fumed alumina supply agreement with Cabot Corporation,
described above in Capital Lease Obligations, under which we are obligated to
pay certain fixed, capital and variable costs through December 2006. This
agreement has an initial five-year term, but we can choose to renew the
agreement for another five-year term. If we do not renew the agreement, we will
become subject to certain terms and conditions and the payment of certain costs.
Purchase obligations include $23.7 million of contractual commitments for fumed
silica and fumed alumina under these contracts based upon our anticipated
renewal of the fumed alumina agreement through December 2011.
We have
an agreement with a toll manufacturer pursuant to which the manufacturer
performs certain agreed-upon dispersion services. We have agreed to purchase
minimum amounts of services per year and to invest approximately $0.2 million
per year in capital improvements or other expenditures to maintain capacity at
the manufacturer’s dispersion facility. The initial term of the agreement
expired in October 2004. In November 2004 the agreement was renewed for another
year under similar terms and conditions. The contract continues to have
automatic one-year renewals and contains a 90-day cancellation clause executable
by either party. Purchase obligations related to this agreement are $6.5
million, which include a termination payment if the agreement is not
renewed.
In June
2003 we entered into a technology licensing and co-marketing agreement with a
semiconductor equipment manufacturer under which we may develop, manufacture and
sell polishing pads utilizing endpoint detection window technology licensed from
the manufacturer for use on the manufacturer’s equipment. Under this agreement,
we are obligated to supply this manufacturer with certain free commercially
available polishing pads, up to an agreed upon dollar amount, for particular
uses over a seven-year period. The previous table includes estimated total costs
associated with these products of $1.2 million over the remaining period. We are
also obligated to supply the equipment manufacturer with certain commercially
available polishing pads, up to an agreed upon dollar amount over the seven-year
period, which the manufacturer will purchase from us at our cost. We will also
pay a royalty to the equipment manufacturer and, in certain circumstances, to
another party to whom we are a sub-licensee under our agreement, based upon net
revenue earned with respect to commercial sales of polishing pads covered under
the agreement. The term of the agreement lasts as long as the patents on the
technology subject to the license agreement remain valid and
enforceable.
During
the second fiscal quarter of 2005 we made progress on the construction of our
new Asia Pacific technology center located adjacent to our existing
manufacturing facility in Geino, Japan. The new 18,000 square foot facility will
provide polishing, metrology and product development capabilities and is
expected to become operational in October 2005. The table above includes $11.4
million in purchase obligations related to this new facility.
OTHER
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
Other
long-term liabilities include $0.9 million for pension liabilities and $0.6 for
deferred compensation obligations.
EFFECTS
OF RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In
December 2004 the FASB issued Statement No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based
Payment” (“SFAS 123R”), which replaces FASB Statement No. 123, “Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation,” (“SFAS 123”) and supersedes Accounting Principles
Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.” SFAS 123R
requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee
stock options, to be recognized in the income statement based on their fair
values, and the pro forma disclosure alternative is no longer allowable under
SFAS 123R. In March 2005 the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) issued
Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 which provided further clarification on the
implementation of SFAS 123R which was originally scheduled to be effective as of
the beginning of the first interim or annual reporting period beginning after
June 15, 2005. In April 2005 the SEC delayed the effective date for SFAS 123R
until annual periods beginning on or after June 15, 2005 and, therefore, SFAS
123R will now be effective for us beginning with the first quarter of fiscal
2006. Prior to this, we anticipated recognizing approximately $11.0 million of
pre-tax share based compensation expense in our fourth quarter of fiscal 2005,
primarily related to the approximately 1.3 million options, the vesting of which
we accelerated to September 1, 2005, plus a prorated portion of annual expense
related to stock option grants made in fiscal 2005, including our normal annual
employee stock option grant made in December 2004. However, due to the delay in
effective date for SFAS 123R we no longer expect to recognize this expense in
the income statement for fiscal 2005. We are currently evaluating the impact and
implementation of SFAS 123R, which we believe will have a material impact on our
consolidated results of operations and earnings per share. Using our current
fair value methodology, the Black-Scholes model, we expect to recognize
approximately $11.0 million of pre-tax share-based compensation for full fiscal
year 2006, assuming we apply our historical approach to long-term incentives and
our approach in determining fair value. Other factors may also impact future
share-based compensation expense including the attribution of the awards to the
service period, the vesting period of stock options, the timing and number of
additional grants of stock option awards, fluctuations in and volatility of our
stock price, expected term of the grants and risk-free rate of
interest.
In March
2005 the FASB issued Interpretation No. 47, “Accounting for Conditional Asset
Retirement Obligations” (“FIN 47”) which is effective for fiscal years ending
after December 15, 2005 and is an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 143,
“Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations”. FIN 47 requires recognition of a
liability for the fair value of a conditional asset retirement obligation when
incurred if the liability’s fair value can be reasonably estimated. We do not
expect the adoption of FIN 47 to have a material impact on our consolidated
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In
November 2004, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 151, “Inventory Costs, an
amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4” (“SFAS 151”), which adopts wording from the
International Accounting Standards Board’s (“IASB”) IAS 2, “Inventories”, in an
effort to improve the comparability of cross-border financial reporting. The new
standard indicates that abnormal freight, handling costs and wasted materials
are required to be treated as current period charges rather than as a portion of
inventory costs. Additionally, the standard clarifies that fixed production
overhead should be allocated based on the normal capacity of a production
facility. SFAS 151 is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005.
We do not expect the adoption of SFAS 151 to have a material impact on our
consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash
flows.
In
December 2004, the FASB issued FASB Statement No 153, “Exchanges on Nonmonetary
Assets, an amendment of APB Opinion No. 29, Accounting for Nonmonetary
Transactions” (”SFAS 153”), as part of its short-term international convergence
project with the IASB. Under SFAS 153, nonmonetary exchanges are required to be
accounted for at fair value, recognizing any gains or losses, if their fair
value is determinable within reasonable limits and the transaction has
commercial substance. SFAS 153 is effective for fiscal years beginning after
June 15, 2005. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS 153 will have a material
impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash
flows.
FACTORS
AFFECTING FUTURE OPERATING RESULTS
RISKS
RELATING TO OUR BUSINESS
WE
HAVE A NARROW PRODUCT RANGE AND OUR PRODUCTS MAY BECOME OBSOLETE, OR
TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGES MAY REDUCE OR LIMIT INCREASES IN CMP
CONSUMPTION
Our
business is substantially dependent on a single class of products, CMP slurries,
which historically has accounted for almost all of our revenue. Our business
would suffer if these products became obsolete or if consumption of these
products decreased. Our success depends on our ability to keep pace with
technological changes and advances in the semiconductor industry and to adapt,
improve and customize our products for the most advanced IC applications in
response to evolving customer needs and industry trends. Since its inception,
the semiconductor industry has experienced rapid technological changes and
advances in the design, manufacture, performance and application of IC devices,
and our customers continually pursue lower cost of ownership of materials
consumed in their manufacturing processes, including CMP slurries. We expect
these technological changes and advances, and this drive toward lower costs, to
continue in the future. Emerging technologies in the semiconductor industry,
such as polishing pads containing abrasives and electrochemical mechanical
planarization (“eCMP”), as well as our customers’ efforts to reduce consumption
of CMP slurries, could render our products less important to the IC device
manufacturing process.
A
SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF OUR BUSINESS COMES FROM A LIMITED NUMBER OF LARGE
CUSTOMERS AND OUR REVENUE AND PROFITS COULD DECREASE SIGNIFICANTLY IF WE LOST
ONE OR MORE OF THEM AS CUSTOMERS
Our
customer base is concentrated among a limited number of large customers. One or
more of these principal customers may stop buying CMP slurries from us or may
substantially reduce the quantity of CMP slurries they purchase from us. Our
principal customers also hold considerable purchasing power, which can impact
the pricing, and terms of sale of our products. Any cancellation, deferral or
significant reduction in CMP slurries sold to these principal customers, or a
significant number of smaller customers, could seriously harm our business,
financial condition and results of operations. Our five largest customers, of
which one is a distributor, accounted for approximately 54% of our revenue for
both the six months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004.
OUR
BUSINESS COULD BE SERIOUSLY HARMED IF OUR EXISTING OR FUTURE COMPETITORS DEVELOP
SUPERIOR SLURRY PRODUCTS, OFFER BETTER PRICING TERMS OR SERVICE, OBTAIN CERTAIN
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS OR IF ANY OF OUR MAJOR CUSTOMERS DEVELOP OR
INCREASE IN-HOUSE SLURRY MANUFACTURING CAPABILITY
Competition
from current CMP slurry manufacturers, new entrants to the CMP slurry market or
a decision by any of our major customers to produce, or increase the production
of slurry products in-house, could seriously harm our business and results of
operations. Competition has increased from other existing providers of CMP
slurries and opportunities exist for other companies with sufficient financial
or technological resources to emerge as potential competitors by developing
their own CMP slurry products. Increased competition and additional in-house
production has and may continue to impact the prices we are able to charge for
our slurry products as well as our overall business. In addition, our
competitors could have or obtain intellectual property rights which could
restrict our ability to market our existing products and/or to innovate and
develop new products.
ANY
PROBLEM OR INTERRUPTION IN SUPPLY OF OUR MOST IMPORTANT RAW MATERIALS, INCLUDING
FUMED METAL OXIDES, COULD DELAY OUR SLURRY PRODUCTION AND ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR
SALES
Our
business would suffer from any problem or interruption in our supply of the key
raw materials we use in our CMP slurries, including fumed alumina and fumed
silica. For example, we operate under three raw material supply agreements with
Cabot Corporation, one of which is for the supply of fumed silica and two of
which are for the supply of fumed alumina. Under these agreements, Cabot
Corporation continues to be our primary supplier of particular amounts and types
of fumed alumina and fumed silica. We believe it would be difficult to promptly
secure alternative sources of key raw materials, including fumed metal oxides,
in the event one of our suppliers becomes unable to supply us with sufficient
quantities of raw materials that meet the quality and technical specifications
required by our customers. In addition, contractual amendments to the existing
agreements with, or non-performance by our suppliers could adversely affect us
as well.
Also, if
we change the supplier or type of key raw materials, such as fumed metal oxides
we use to make our existing CMP slurries or are required to purchase them from a
different manufacturer or manufacturing facility or otherwise modify our
products, in certain circumstances our customers might have to requalify our CMP
slurries for their manufacturing processes and products. The requalification
process could take a significant amount of time to complete, possibly
interrupting or reducing our sales of CMP slurries to these
customers.
BECAUSE
WE HAVE LIMITED EXPERIENCE IN BUSINESS AREAS OUTSIDE OF CMP SLURRIES, EXPANSION
OF OUR BUSINESS INTO NEW PRODUCTS AND APPLICATIONS MAY NOT BE
SUCCESSFUL
An
element of our strategy has been to leverage our current customer relationships
and technological expertise to expand our business into new product areas and
applications, including CMP polishing pads. Expanding our business into new
product areas involve technologies and production processes in which we have
limited experience, and we may not be able to develop and produce products that
satisfy our customers’ needs or we may be unable to keep pace with technological
or other developments. Also, our competitors may have or obtain intellectual
property rights which could restrict our ability to market our existing products
and/or to innovate and develop new products.
WE
ARE SUBJECT TO SOME RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH OUR FOREIGN
OPERATIONS
We
currently have operations and a large customer base outside of the United
States. For fiscal 2004, approximately 75% of our revenue was generated by sales
to customers outside of the United States. For the six months ended March 31,
2005, approximately 77% of our revenue was generated by sales to customers
outside the United States. We encounter risks in doing business in certain
foreign countries, including but not limited to, adverse changes in economic and
political conditions, as well as difficulty in enforcing business and customer
contracts and agreements, including protection of intellectual property
rights.
BECAUSE
WE RELY HEAVILY ON OUR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, OUR FAILURE TO ADEQUATELY OBTAIN
OR PROTECT IT COULD SERIOUSLY HARM OUR BUSINESS
Protection
of intellectual property is particularly important in our industry because CMP
slurry and pad manufacturers develop complex technical formulas for CMP products
which are proprietary in nature and differentiate their products from those of
competitors. Our intellectual property is important to our success and ability
to compete. We attempt to protect our intellectual property rights through a
combination of patent, trademark, copyright and trade secret laws, as well as
employee and third-party nondisclosure and assignment agreements. Our failure to
obtain or maintain adequate protection of our intellectual property rights for
any reason could seriously harm our business.
DEMAND
FOR OUR PRODUCTS AND OUR BUSINESS MAY BE ADVERSELY AFFECTED BY WORLDWIDE
ECONOMIC AND INDUSTRY CONDITIONS
Our
business is affected by current economic and industry conditions and it is
extremely difficult to predict sales of our products given uncertainties in
these factors. For example, our quarterly revenue in fiscal years 2001 through
2003 was affected by the global economic slowdown and weakening in demand for
electronic systems, coupled with higher than normal chip inventories. While the
semiconductor industry recovered from this prolonged downturn in fiscal 2004,
the first two quarters of fiscal 2005 were again adversely affected by reduced
wafer starts, which we believe was driven by certain finished goods inventory
corrections in the semiconductor industry. Although some semiconductor industry
experts have commented that they expect some recovery in the semiconductor
industry later in calendar year 2005, there are several factors that make it
difficult for us to predict future revenue trends for our business, including:
the cyclical nature of, and the continued uncertainty in, the semiconductor
industry; short order to delivery time and the associated lack of visibility to
future customer orders; and the effect of competition on pricing.
OUR
INABILITY TO ATTRACT AND RETAIN KEY PERSONNEL COULD CAUSE OUR BUSINESS TO
SUFFER
If we
fail to attract and retain the necessary managerial, technical and customer
support personnel, our business and our ability to maintain existing and obtain
new customers, develop new products and provide acceptable levels of customer
service could suffer. Competition for qualified personnel, particularly those
with significant experience in the CMP and IC device industries, is intense. The
loss of services of key employees could harm our business and results of
operations.
RISKS
RELATING TO THE MARKET FOR OUR COMMON STOCK
THE
MARKET PRICE MAY FLUCTUATE SIGNIFICANTLY AND RAPIDLY
The
market price of our common stock has and could continue to fluctuate
significantly as a result of factors such as: economic and stock market
conditions generally and specifically as they may impact participants in the
semiconductor industries; changes in financial estimates and recommendations by
securities analysts who follow our stock; earnings and other announcements by,
and changes in market evaluations of, us or participants in the semiconductor
and related industries; changes in business or regulatory conditions affecting
us or participants in the semiconductor and related industries; announcements or
implementation by us, our competitors, or our customers of technological
innovations, new products or different business strategies; and trading volume
of our common stock.
ANTI-TAKEOVER
PROVISIONS UNDER OUR CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION AND BYLAWS AND OUR RIGHTS PLAN
MAY DISCOURAGE THIRD PARTIES FROM MAKING AN UNSOLICITED BID FOR OUR
COMPANY
Our
certificate of incorporation, our bylaws, our rights plan and various provisions
of the Delaware General Corporation Law may make it more difficult to effect a
change in control of our company. For example, our amended certificate of
incorporation authorizes our board of directors to issue up to 20 million shares
of blank check preferred stock and to attach special rights and preferences to
this preferred stock. Also our amended certificate of incorporation provides for
the division of our board of directors into three classes as nearly equal in
size as possible with staggered three-year terms. In addition, the rights issued
to our stockholders under our rights plan may make it more difficult or
expensive for another person or entity to acquire control of us without the
consent of our board of directors.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
EFFECT
OF CURRENCY EXCHANGE RATES AND EXCHANGE RATE RISK
MANAGEMENT
We
conduct business operations outside of the United States through our foreign
operations. Our foreign operations maintain their accounting records in their
local currencies. Consequently, period to period comparability of results of
operations is affected by fluctuations in exchange rates. The primary currencies
to which we have exposure are the Japanese Yen and, to a lesser extent, the
British Pound and the Euro. From time to time we enter into forward contracts in
an effort to manage foreign currency exchange exposure. However, we may be
unable to hedge these exposures completely. Approximately 15% of our revenue is
transacted in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. We do not currently enter
into forward exchange contracts or other derivative instruments for speculative
or trading purposes.
MARKET
RISK AND SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF FOREIGN EXCHANGE RATE
RISK
We have
performed a sensitivity analysis assuming a hypothetical 10% adverse movement in
foreign exchange rates. As of March 31, 2005, the analysis demonstrated that
such market movements would not have a material adverse effect on our
consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows over a
one-year period. Actual gains and losses in the future may differ materially
from this analysis based on changes in the timing and amount of foreign currency
rate movements and our actual exposures.
Our
management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, has conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the
design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of the
end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure
controls and procedures were effective as of March 31, 2005.
While we
believe the present design of our disclosure controls and procedures is
effective to make known to our senior management in a timely fashion all
material information concerning our business, we intend to continue to improve
the design and effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures to the
extent necessary in the future to provide our senior management with timely
access to such material information, and to correct any deficiencies that we may
discover in the future.
There
were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred
during our most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial
reporting.
PART
II. OTHER
INFORMATION
We are
not currently involved in any material legal proceedings.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED
SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
ISSUER
PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Period |
Total
Number of Shares Purchased |
|
Average
Price Paid Per Share |
|
Total
Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or
Programs |
|
Approximate
Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or
Programs (in thousands) |
Jan
1, 2005 through Jan 31, 2005 |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
$ |
13,268 |
Feb
1, 2005 through Feb 28, 2005 |
|
147,764 |
|
$ |
32.48 |
|
|
147,764 |
|
$ |
8,468 |
March
1, 2005 through March 31, 2005 |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
$ |
8,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
147,764 |
|
$ |
32.48 |
|
|
147,764 |
|
$ |
8,468 |
In July
2004 our Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program for up to
$25.0 million of our outstanding common stock, under which shares are
repurchased from time to time, depending on market conditions, in open market
transactions, at management’s discretion. The program is primarily intended to
diminish earnings dilution from the issuance of stock from the exercise of stock
options under our equity incentive plan and purchases under our employee stock
purchase plan. We fund share repurchases from our existing cash and short-term
investments balance and the program may be suspended or terminated at any time,
at the Company’s discretion.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION
OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
At the
annual meeting of stockholders of Cabot Microelectronics held on March 8, 2005,
the following proposals were approved:
Proposal
I - Election of two directors, each for a term of three years
|
Number
of Votes For Election |
Number
of Votes Withheld |
Steven
V. Wilkinson |
20,820,052 |
1,252,703 |
Robert
J. Birgeneau |
21,801,058 |
271,697 |
Proposal
II - Ratification of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the
company’s independent auditors for fiscal 2005
A
proposal to ratify the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the company’s
independent auditors for fiscal 2005 was approved with 21,728,797 shares
cast for, 334,532 shares cast against, and 9,426 shares abstaining.
The
exhibit numbers in the following list correspond to the number assigned to such
exhibits in the Exhibit Table of Item 601 of Regulation S-K:
Exhibit
Number |
Description |
|
|
10.44 |
Amendment
as of January 17, 2005 to Four Grant Agreements for Non-Qualified Stock
Option Awards with Grant Dates of March 13, 2001, March 12, 2002, March
11, 2003 and March 9, 2004, respectively.* |
|
|
10.45 |
Amendment
as of January 29, 2005 to Three Grant Agreements for Non-Qualified Stock
Option Awards with Grant Dates of March 13, 2001, March 12, 2002 and March
11, 2003, respectively.* |
|
|
10.46 |
Non-Employee
Directors’ Compensation Summary as of March, 2005.* |
|
|
31.1 |
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
31.2 |
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
32.1 |
Certification
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
* Management
contract, or compensatory plan or arrangement.
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
|
CABOT
MICROELECTRONICS CORPORATION |
|
|
|
|
Date:
May 9, 2005 |
/s/
WILLIAM S. JOHNSON |
|
William
S. Johnson |
|
Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
[Principal
Financial Officer] |
|
|
|
|
Date:
May 9, 2005 |
/s/
THOMAS S. ROMAN |
|
Thomas
S. Roman |
|
Corporate
Controller |
|
[Principal
Accounting Officer] |