UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark one)
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003.
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 0-26392
LEVEL 8 SYSTEMS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware 11-2920559 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation (I.R.S Employer Identification Number)
or organization)
214 Carnegie Center, Suite 303, Princeton, New Jersey 085401
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(609) 987-9001
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15d of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES X NO _
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES _ NO X
Indicate the number of shares outstanding in each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
25,256,790 shares of common stock, $.001 par value, were outstanding as of November 6, 2003.
|
Level 8 Systems, Inc.
Index
PART I. Financial Information |
Page Number |
|
|
Item 1. Financial Statements |
|
|
|
Consolidated balance sheets as of September 30, 2003 (unaudited) |
|
and December 31, 2002............................................................................................................... | |
|
|
Consolidated statements of operations for the three and nine months |
|
ended September 30, 2003 and 2002 (unaudited).................................................................. | |
|
|
Consolidated statements of cash flows for the nine months |
|
ended September 30, 2003 and 2002 (unaudited)................................................................... | |
|
|
Consolidated statements of comprehensive loss for the three and nine |
|
months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002 (unaudited)..................................................... | |
|
|
Notes to consolidated financial statements (unaudited)...................................................... | |
|
|
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and |
|
Results of Operations................................................................................................................. | |
|
|
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk ............................................ | |
|
|
Item 4. Controls and Procedures........................................................................................................... | |
|
|
PART II. Other Information............................................................................................................................... | |
|
|
|
|
SIGNATURES........................................................................................................................................................... | |
|
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
LEVEL 8 SYSTEMS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(unaudited)
|
September 30, 2003 |
|
December 31, 2002 |
ASSETS |
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ 70 |
|
$ 199 |
Cash held in escrow |
775 |
|
-- |
Assets of operations to be abandoned |
220 |
|
453 |
Trade accounts receivable, net |
3 |
|
1,291 |
Receivable from related party |
-- |
|
73 |
Notes receivable |
-- |
|
867 |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
369 |
|
731 |
Total current assets |
1,437 |
|
3,614 |
Property and equipment, net |
67 |
|
162 |
Software product technology, net |
4,958 |
|
7,996 |
Other assets |
47 |
|
80 |
Total assets |
$ 6,509 |
|
$ 11,852 |
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT) |
|
|
|
Short term debt. |
$ 2,570 |
|
$ 2,893 |
Accounts payable |
2,594 |
|
3,537 |
Accrued expenses: |
|
|
|
Salaries, wages, and related items. |
317 |
|
107 |
Restructuring. |
-- |
|
772 |
Other |
1,509 |
|
1,332 |
Liabilities of operations to be abandoned |
610 |
|
916 |
Deferred revenue |
104 |
|
311 |
Total current liabilities |
7,704 |
|
9,868 |
|
|
|
|
Long term liability |
131 |
|
-- |
Warrant liability. |
466 |
|
331 |
Senior convertible redeemable preferred stock |
3,530 |
|
-- |
|
|
|
|
Stockholders' equity (deficit): |
|
|
|
Preferred stock |
-- |
|
-- |
Common stock |
24 |
|
19 |
Additional paid-in-capital |
203,852 |
|
202,916 |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(3) |
|
(717) |
Accumulated deficit |
(209,195) |
|
(200,565) |
Total stockholders' equity (deficit) |
(5,322) |
|
1,653 |
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity |
$ 6,509 |
|
$ 11,852 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
3 |
LEVEL 8 SYSTEMS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
||||
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
||||
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software |
$ 9 |
|
$ 324 |
|
$ 88 |
|
$ 440 |
Maintenance |
80 |
|
28 |
|
247 |
|
511 |
Services |
24 |
|
471 |
|
98 |
|
949 |
Total operating revenue |
113 |
|
823 |
|
433 |
|
1,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software |
1,553 |
|
841 |
|
3,235 |
|
6,797 |
Maintenance |
99 |
|
11 |
|
294 |
|
149 |
Services |
195 |
|
393 |
|
643 |
|
672 |
Total cost of revenue |
1,847 |
|
1,245 |
|
4,172 |
|
7,618 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin. |
(1,734) |
|
(422) |
|
(3,739) |
|
(5,718) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing |
371 |
|
582 |
|
1,430 |
|
2,226 |
Research and product development |
265 |
|
310 |
|
773 |
|
1,557 |
General and administrative |
647 |
|
551 |
|
1,959 |
|
2,766 |
(Gain)/loss on disposal of assets |
(6) |
|
(21) |
|
(19) |
|
317 |
Restructuring, net |
(834) |
|
-- |
|
(834) |
|
1,300 |
Total operating expenses |
443 |
|
1,422 |
|
3,309 |
|
8,166 |
Loss from operations |
(2,177) |
|
(1,844) |
|
(7,048) |
|
(13,884) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
6 |
|
65 |
|
32 |
|
115 |
Interest expense |
(53) |
|
(129) |
|
(155) |
|
(431) |
Change in fair value of warrant liability |
(242) |
|
(32) |
|
(135) |
|
2,657 |
Gain/(loss) on closure of subsidiaries |
-- |
|
-- |
|
(499) |
|
-- |
Other expense |
(2) |
|
(8) |
|
(61) |
|
(182) |
Loss before provision for income taxes |
(2,468) |
|
(1,948) |
|
(7,866) |
|
(11,725) |
Income tax provision |
-- |
|
-- |
|
-- |
|
(123) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations |
(2,468) |
|
(1,948) |
|
(7,866) |
|
(11,602) |
Loss from discontinued operations |
(58) |
|
484 |
|
(124) |
|
(6,488) |
Net loss |
$ (2,526) |
|
$(1,464) |
|
$ (7,990) |
|
$ (18,090) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per share continuing operations-basic and diluted |
(0.12) |
|
(0.12) |
|
(0.42) |
|
(0.64) |
Loss per share discontinued operations-basic and diluted. |
(0.00) |
|
.03 |
|
(0.01) |
|
(0.34) |
Net loss per share applicable to common shareholders –basic and diluted |
$ (0.12) |
|
$ (0.09) |
|
$ (0.43) |
|
$ (0.98) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding – basic and diluted. |
21,371 |
|
19,022 |
|
20,104 |
|
18,819 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
4 |
LEVEL 8 SYSTEMS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands, except share data)
(unaudited)
|
Nine Months Ended |
||
|
September 30, |
||
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
Net loss |
$ (7,990) |
|
$ (18,090) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: |
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
2,388 |
|
7,372 |
Change in fair value of warrant liability |
135 |
|
(2,657) |
Stock compensation expense |
53 |
|
92 |
Impairment of software product technology |
745 |
|
-- |
Provision for doubtful accounts |
(43) |
|
(91) |
(Gain)/loss on disposal of assets |
(19) |
|
256 |
Other. |
-- |
|
138 |
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of assets acquired and liabilities assumed: |
|
|
|
Trade accounts receivable and related party receivables |
1,404 |
|
1,022 |
Assets & liabilities – discontinued operations |
189 |
|
8,160 |
Due from Liraz |
-- |
|
(56) |
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
270 |
|
224 |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
(598) |
|
(1,332) |
Deferred revenue |
(207) |
|
(1,820) |
Net cash used in operating activities |
(3,673) |
|
(6,782) |
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
Proceed from sale of assets |
-- |
|
521 |
Repayment of note receivable |
867 |
|
2,021 |
Investment held for resale |
-- |
|
145 |
Cash received from sale of line of business assets |
-- |
|
1,000 |
Net cash provided by investing activities |
867 |
|
3,687 |
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs |
5 |
|
1,973 |
Proceeds from issuance of convertible redeemable preferred stock, net of cash held in escrow of $775 |
2,755 |
|
-- |
Proceeds from issuance of preferred shares |
-- |
|
1,380 |
Proceeds from exercise of warrants |
243 |
|
-- |
Borrowings on line of credit. |
-- |
|
179 |
Repayments of term loans, credit facility and notes payable |
(323) |
|
(638) |
Net cash provided by financing activities |
2,680 |
|
2,894 |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
(3) |
|
(202) |
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
(129) |
|
(403) |
Cash and cash equivalents: |
|
|
|
Beginning of period |
199 |
|
698 |
End of period |
$ 70 |
|
$ 295 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
5 |
LEVEL 8 SYSTEMS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
||||
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
||||
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
Net loss |
$ (2,526) |
|
$ (1,464) |
|
$ (7,990) |
|
$ (18,090) |
Other comprehensive income, net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
(3) |
|
(10) |
|
(5) |
|
(202) |
Comprehensive loss |
$ (2,529) |
|
$ (1,474) |
|
$ (7,995) |
|
$ (18,292) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
6 |
LEVEL 8 SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)
NOTE 1. INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The accompanying consolidated financial statements are unaudited, and have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). Certain information and note disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles of the United States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to those rules and regulations. Accordingly, these interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto contained in the Level 8 Systems, Inc.'s (the "Company") Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002. The results of operations for the interim periods shown in this report are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for other interim periods or for the full fiscal year. In the opinion of management, the inform ation contained herein reflects all adjustments necessary for a fair statement of the interim results of operations. All such adjustments are of a normal, recurring nature. Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior year amounts to conform to the current year presentation.
The year-end condensed balance sheet data was derived from audited financial statements in accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC, but does not include all disclosures required for financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles of the United States of America.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries. All of the Company's subsidiaries are wholly owned for the periods presented.
Liquidity
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has incurred losses of $18 million and $105 million for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively and has experienced negative cash flows from operations for each of the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000. For the nine months ended September 30, 2003, the Company incurred a loss from operations of $8.0 million and had a working capital deficiency of approximately $6.3 million. The Company’s future revenues are entirely dependent on acceptance of a newly developed and marketed product, Cicero, which has limited success in commercial markets to date. Accordingly, there is substantial doubt that the Company can continue as a going concern. In order to address these issues and to obtain adequa te financing for the Company’s operations for the next twelve months, the Company is actively promoting and expanding its Cicero related product line and continues to negotiate with significant customers that have begun or finalized the “proof of concept” stage with the Cicero technology. The Company is experiencing difficulty increasing sales revenue largely because of the inimitable nature of the product as well as customer concerns about the financial viability of the Company. The Company is attempting to solve the former problem by improving the market’s knowledge and understanding of Cicero through increased marketing and leveraging its limited number of reference accounts. The Company is attempting to address the financial concerns of potential customers by pursuing strategic partnerships with companies that have significant financial resources although the Company has not experienced significant success to date with this approach. Additionally, the Company is s eeking additional equity capital or other strategic transactions in the near term to provide additional liquidity. There can be no assurance that management will be successful in executing these strategies as anticipated or in a timely manner or that increased revenues will reduce further operating losses. If the Company is unable to significantly increase cash flow or obtain additional financing, it will likely be unable to generate sufficient capital to fund operations for the next twelve months and may be required to pursue other means of financing that may not be on terms favorable to the Company or its stockholders. These factors among others may indicate that the Company will be unable to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of time.
The financial statements presented herein do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability of assets and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern. To address these issues, the Company is actively promoting and expanding its product line and is continuing preliminary sales negotiations with several significant potential customers. In March 2003, the Company successfully completed a private financing round wherein it raised approximately $3.5 million of new funds from several investors, of which approximately $1.5 million was immediately available to the Company. An additional $390 was released to the Company during the quarter ended June 30, 2003, with the remaining $610 released during the quarter ended September 30, 2003. Additionally in October 2003, the Company completed a private financing round wherein it raised approximately $853, of which, approximately $653 represented actual cash proceeds of new funds from several investors. Management expects that increased revenues will reduce its operating losses in future periods; however, there can be no assurance that the revenues will be forthcoming as anticipated.
7 |
Use of Accounting Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual amounts could differ from these estimates.
Discontinued Operations
During the third quarter of 2002, the Company made a decision to dispose of the Systems Integration segment and entered into negotiations with potential buyers. The Systems Integration segment qualified for treatment as a discontinued operation in accordance with the SFAS 144 “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” and the Company has reclassified the results of operations for Systems Integration segment in 2002 to loss on discontinued operations in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The sale of the Systems Integration segment was completed in December 2002. See Note 3.
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company has adopted the disclosure provisions of SFAS 123 and has applied Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 and related Interpretations in accounting for its stock-based compensation plans. Had compensation cost for the Company’s stock option plan been determined based on the fair value at the grant dates for awards under the plan consistent with the method required by SFAS No. 123, the Company’s net income and diluted net income per common share would have been the pro forma amounts indicated below.
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
||||
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
||||
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
Net loss applicable to common stockholders |
$ (2,526) |
|
$(1,464) |
|
$ (7,990) |
|
$(18,090) |
Less: Total stock-based employee compensation expense under fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects |
(90) |
|
(420) |
|
(328) |
|
(1,518) |
Pro forma loss applicable to common stockholders |
$ (2,616) |
|
$(1,884) |
|
$ (8,318) |
|
$ (19,608) |
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted as reported |
$ (0.12) |
|
$ (0.12) |
|
$ (0.45) |
|
$ (1.06) |
NOTE 2. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In July 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities (“SFAS No. 146”.) This statement requires companies to recognize costs associated with exit or disposal activities when they are incurred rather than at the date of a commitment to an exit or disposal plan. SFAS No. 146 is to be applied prospectively to exit or disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002. The adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.
In November 2002, the Emerging Issues Task Force, or EITF, of the FASB finalized its tentative consensus on EITF Issue 00-21, “Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables”, which provides guidance on the timing and method of revenue recognition for sales arrangements that include the delivery of more than one product or service. EITF 00-21 is effective prospectively for arrangements entered into in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2003. The adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.
In November 2002, the FASB issued Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 45, or FIN 45, “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others, an interpretation of FASB Statement Nos. 5, 57, and 107 and Rescission of FASB Interpretation No. 34.” FIN 45 clarifies the requirements of FASB Statement No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies,” relating to the guarantor’s accounting for, and disclosure of, the issuance of certain types of guarantees. FIN 45 requires that upon issuance of a guarantee, the guarantor must recognize a liability for the fair value of the obligation it assumes under that guarantee. The disclosure provisions of FIN 45 are effective for financial statements of interim or annual periods that end after December 15, 2002. FIN 45’s provisions for initial recognition an d measurement should be applied on a prospective basis to guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002, irrespective of the guarantor’s fiscal year-end. The guarantor’s previous accounting for guarantees that were issued before the date of FIN 45’s initial application may not be revised or restated to reflect the effect of the recognition and measurement provisions of FIN 45. The adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.
In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure – an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 123.” This Statement amends SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”, to provide alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. In addition, this statement amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123 to require prominent disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements about the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method used on reported results. This statement requires that companies having a year-end after December 15, 2002 follow the prescribed format and provide the addi tional disclosures in their annual reports. The adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.
In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46 or FIN 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities”, an interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, “Consolidated Financial Statements”. In October 2003, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position FIN 46-6, “Effective Date of FASB Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities” deferring the effective date for applying the provisions of FIN 46 for public entities’ interests in variable interest entities or potential variable interest entities created before February 1, 2003 until financial statements of interim or annual periods that end after December 15, 2003. FIN 46 establishes accounting guidance for consolidation of variable interest entities that function to support the activities of the primary beneficiary. The Company has no investment in or contractual relationship or other business relationship with a variable interest entity and therefore the adoption of this interpretation did not have any impact on its consolidated financial position or results of operations. However, if the Company enters into any such arrangement with a variable interest entity in the future or an entity with which we ha ve a relationship is reconsidered based on guidance in FIN 46 to be a variable interest entity, the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations might be materially impacted.
In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity”. SFAS No. 150 establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. It requires that an issuer classify a financial instrument that is within its scope as a liability (or an asset in some circumstances). Many of those instruments were previously classified as equity. Some of the provisions of this Statement are consistent with the current definition of liabilities in FASB Concepts Statement No. 6, “Elements of Financial Statements”. The adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.
8 |
NOTE 3. DISPOSITIONS
Sale of Geneva
Effective October 1, 2002, the Company sold its Systems Integration software business to EM Software Solutions, Inc. Under the terms of the agreement, EM Software Solutions acquired all rights, title and interest to the Geneva Enterprise Integrator and Geneva Business Process Automator products along with certain receivables, deferred revenue, maintenance contracts, fixed assets and certain liabilities. The Company had identified these assets as being held for sale during the third quarter of 2002 and as such, reclassified the results of operations to “income/loss from discontinued operations”. The Company received total proceeds of $1,637, $276 in cash, a short-term note in the amount of $744 and a five-year note payable monthly in the amount of $617. The short-term note was repaid by February 13, 2003. The five-year note was recorded net of an allowance of $494 and was assigned in settlement of certain litigation in August 2003. The net book value of the software technology was $1,283, the carrying value of the assets sold was approximately $374, and other adjustments of $260 resulted in a loss on the disposal of discontinued operations of $769.
Sale of Star SQL and CTRC
In June 2002, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with StarQuest Ventures, Inc., a California corporation and an affiliate of Paul Rampel, who was at that time, a member of the Board of Directors of the Company and a former executive officer. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company sold its Star SQL and CTRC products and certain fixed assets to StarQuest Ventures for $365 and the assumption of certain maintenance liabilities. The Company received $300 in cash and a note receivable of $65 which was subsequently paid. The loss on sale of the assets was $74. The Company used $150 from the proceeds to repay borrowings from Mr. Rampel.
NOTE 4. SOFTWARE PRODUCT TECHNOLOGY
As of June 30, 2003, all of the Company’s software product technology relates to the Cicero technology. Effective July 2002, the Company determined that the estimated asset life of the Cicero technology has been extended as a result of the amended license agreement with Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (“Merrill Lynch”) wherein the exclusive right to modify, commercialize, and distribute the technology was extended in perpetuity. Accordingly, the Company reassessed the estimated life of the technology and extended it from three years to five years. The effect of the change in the estimated life resulted in a reduction of $1.2 million and $3.5 million of amortization expense for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2003, respectively. The impa ct on the net loss applicable to common stockholders – basic and diluted was $(0.05) per share for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 and $(0.17) per share for the nine months ended September 30, 2003.
In accordance with FASB 86, "Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software to Be Sold, Leased, or Otherwise Marketed", the Company completed an assessment of the recoverability of the Cicero product technology as of September 30, 2003. This assessment was completed due to the Company’s continued operating losses and the limited software revenue generated by the Cicero technology over the past twelve to eighteen months. Currently, the Company is in negotiations with numerous customers to purchase licenses, which would have a significant impact on the cash flows from the Cicero technology and the Company. Since the negotiations have been in process f or several months and expected completion of the transactions has been delayed, the Company has reduced its cash flow projections. Historical cash flows generated by the Cicero technology do not support the long-lived asset and accordingly the Company has impaired the unamortized book value of the technology in excess of the expected net realizable value as of September 30, 2003. This impairment charge, in the amount of $745, has been recorded in cost of software revenue.
NOTE 5. RESTRUCTURING CHARGES
As discussed in the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, the Company has completed restructurings in 2001 and 2002. As of December 31, 2002, the Company’s accrual for restructuring was $772, which was primarily comprised of excess facility costs. As more fully discussed in Note 11 Contingencies, subsequent to September 30, 2003, the Company settled litigation relating to these excess facilities. Accordingly, the Company has reversed the restructuring balance, as of September 30, 2003. Under the terms of the settlement agreement, the Company agreed to assign the Note receivable from the sale of Genava to EM Software Solutions, Inc., (see Note 3 Dispositions), with recourse equal to the unpaid portion of the Note receivable should the note obligor, EM Software Solutions, Inc., default on future payments. The current unpaid principal portion of the Note receivable assigned is approximately $55 5 and matures December 2007. The Company assessed the probability of liability under the recourse provisions using a probability weighted cash flow analysis and has recognized a long-term liability in the amount of $131.
NOTE 6. SENIOR CONVERTIBLE REDEEMABLE PREFERRED STOCK
On March 19, 2003, the Company completed a $3.5 million private placement of Series D Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock (“Series D Preferred Stock”), convertible at a conversion ratio of $0.32 per share of common stock into an aggregate of 11,031,250 shares of common stock. As part of the financing, the Company has also issued warrants to purchase an aggregate of 4,158,780 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.07 per share (“Series D-1 Warrants”). On October 10, 2003, the Company, consistent with its obligations, also issued warrants to purchase an aggregate of 1,665,720 shares of common stock at an exercise price the lesser of $0.20 per share or market price at the time of exercise (“Series D-2 Warrants”). The Series D-2 Warrants became exercisable on November 1, 2003, because the Company failed to report $6 million in gross revenues for the nine month period ended September 30, 2003. Both existing and new investors participated in the financing. The Company also agreed to register the common stock issuable upon conversion of the Series D Preferred Stock and exercise of the warrants for resale under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Under the terms of the financing agreement, a redemption event may occur if any one person, entity or group shall control more than 35% of the voting power of the Company’s capital stock. The Company allocated the proceeds received from the sale of the Series D Preferred Stock and warrants to the preferred stock and detachable warrants on a relative fair value basis, resulting in the allocation of $2,890 to the Series D Preferred Stock and $640 to the detachable warrants. Based upon the allocation of the proceeds, the Company determined that the effective conversion price of the Series D Preferred Stock was less than the fair value of the Company’s common stock on the date of issuance. The beneficial conversion feature was recorded as a discount on the value of the Series D Preferred Stock and an increase in additional paid-in capital. Because the Series D Preferred Stock was convertible immediately upon issuance, the Company fully amortized such beneficial conversion feature on the date of issuance.
As part of the financing, the Company and the lead investors have agreed to form a joint venture to exploit the Cicero technology in the Asian market. The terms of the agreement required that the Company deposit $1,000,000 of the gross proceeds from the financing into escrow to fund the joint venture. The escrow agreement allows for the immediate release of funds to cover organizational costs of the joint venture. During the quarter ended March 31, 2003, $225 of escrowed funds was released. If the joint venture is not formed and operational on or by July 17, 2003, the lead investors will have the right, but not the obligation, to require the Company to purchase $1,000,000 in liquidation value of the Series D Preferred Stock at a 5% per annum premium, less their pro-rata share of expenses. The Company and the lead investor have mutually agreed to extend the escrow release provisions until November 21, 2003.
Another condition of the financing required the Company to place an additional $1,000,000 of the gross proceeds into escrow, pending the execution of a definitive agreement with Merrill Lynch providing for the sale of all right, title and interest to the Cicero technology. Since a transaction with Merrill Lynch for the sale of Cicero was not consummated by May 18, 2003, the lead investors have the right, but not the obligation, to require the Company to purchase $1,000,000 in liquidation value of the Series D Preferred Stock at a 5% per annum premium. During the second quarter, $390 of escrowed funds was released. In addition, the Company and the lead investor agreed to extend the escrow release provisions until the end of July 2003 when all remaining escrow monies were released to the Company.
9 |
NOTE 7. STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
In connection with the sale of Series D Preferred Stock, the holders of the Company’s Series A3 Preferred Stock and Series B3 Preferred Stock (collectively, the “Existing Preferred Stockholders”), entered into an agreement whereby the Existing Preferred Stockholders have agreed to waive certain applicable price protection anti-dilution provisions. Under the terms of the waiver agreement, the Company is also permitted to issue equity securities representing aggregate proceeds of up to an additional $4.9 million following the sale of the Series D Preferred Stock. Additionally, the Existing Preferred Stockholders have also agreed to a limited lock-up period restricting their ability to sell common stock issuable upon convers ion of their preferred stock and warrants and to waive the accrual of any dividends that may otherwise be payable as a result of the Company’s delisting from Nasdaq. As consideration for the waiver agreement, the Company has agreed to issue on a pro rata basis warrants to purchase up to 1 million shares of the Company’s common stock to all the Existing Preferred Stockholders on a pro rata basis at such time and from time to time as the Company closes financing transactions that represent proceeds in excess of $2.9 million, excluding the proceeds from the Series D Preferred Stock transaction. Such warrants will have an exercise price that is the greater of $0.40 or the same exercise price as the exercise price of the warrant, or equity security, that the Company issues in connection with the Company’s financing or loan transaction that exceeds the $2.9 million threshold.
NOTE 8. INCOME TAXES
The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes." The Company's effective tax rate differs from the statutory rate primarily due to the fact that no income tax benefit was recorded for the net loss for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002. Because of the Company's recurring losses, the deferred tax assets have been fully offset by a valuation allowance.
NOTE 9. LOSS PER SHARE
Basic loss per share is computed based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted loss per share is computed based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and any potentially dilutive securities. Potentially dilutive securities outstanding during the periods presented include stock options, warrants and convertible preferred stock.
The following table sets forth the reconciliation of net loss to loss available to common stockholders:
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
||||
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
||||
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
Net loss, as reported. |
$ (2,526) |
|
$ (1,464) |
|
$ (7,990) |
|
$ (18,090) |
Accretion of preferred stock. |
-- |
|
(329) |
|
(640) |
|
(329) |
Loss applicable to common stockholders, as adjusted. |
$ (2,526) |
|
$ (1,793) |
|
$ (8,630) |
|
$ (18,419) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per share continuing operations. |
$ (0.12) |
|
$ (0.12) |
|
$ (0.42) |
|
$ (0.64) |
Profit/loss per share discontinued operations |
-- |
|
0.03 |
|
(0.01) |
|
(0.34) |
Net loss per share applicable to common shareholders |
$ (0.12) |
|
$ (0.09) |
|
$ (0.43) |
|
$ (0.98) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted common shares outstanding – basic and diluted |
21,371 |
|
19,022 |
|
20,104 |
|
18,819 |
Accretion of the preferred stock arises as a result of the beneficial conversion feature realized in the sale of preferred stock.
The following table sets forth the potential shares that are not included in the diluted net loss per share calculation because to do so would be anti-dilutive for the periods presented:
10 |
<TABLE><CAPTION><BTB>
|
|
September 30, |
||
|
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
Stock options, common share equivalent |
|
5,743 |
|
3,172 |
Warrants, common share equivalent |
|
6,880 |
|
4,091 |
Preferred stock, common share equivalent |
|
16,893 |
|
7,967 |
|
|
29,516 |
|
15,230 |
NOTE 10. SEGMENT INFORMATION AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
Management makes operating decisions and assesses performance of the Company’s operations based on the following reportable segments: Desktop Integration segment and Messaging and Application Engineering segment.
The principal product in the Desktop Integration segment is Cicero. Cicero is a business integration software product that maximizes end-user productivity, streamlines business operations and integrates disparate systems and applications.
The product that comprises the Messaging and Application Engineering segment is Geneva Integration Broker. During 2002, the Company sold its CTRC and Star/SQL products.
Segment data includes a charge allocating all corporate-headquarters costs to each of its operating segments based on each segment's proportionate share of expenses. During 2002, the Company reported the operations of its Systems Integration segment as discontinued operations and has reallocated the corporate overhead for the Systems Integration segment in 2002. The Company evaluates the performance of its segments and allocates resources to them based on earnings (loss) before interest and other income/(expense), taxes, in-process research and development, and restructuring.
While segment profitability should not be construed as a substitute for operating income or a better indicator of liquidity than cash flows from operating activities, which are determined in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, it is included herein to provide additional information with respect to our ability to meet our future debt service, capital expenditure and working capital requirements. Segment profitability is not necessarily a measure of our ability to fund our cash needs. The non-GAAP measures presented may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies
The table below presents information about reported segments for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002:
|
Desktop Integration |
|
Messaging and Application Engineering |
|
Total |
||||||
|
September 30, 2003 |
|
September 30, 2003 |
|
September 30, 2003 |
||||||
|
Three months ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
Three months ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
Three months ended |
|
Nine months ended |
Total revenue |
$ 100 |
|
$ 375 |
|
$ 13 |
|
$ 58 |
|
$ 113 |
|
$ 433 |
Total cost of revenue |
1,847 |
|
4,099 |
|
-- |
|
73 |
|
1,847 |
|
4,172 |
Gross profit/(loss) |
(1,747) |
|
(3,724) |
|
13 |
|
(15) |
|
(1,734) |
|
(3,739) |
Total operating expenses |
1,220 |
|
3,956 |
|
63 |
|
206 |
|
1,283 |
|
4,162 |
Segment profitability |
$ (2,967) |
|
$ (7,680) |
|
$ (50) |
|
$ (221) |
|
$ (3,017) |
|
$ (7,901) |
11 |
The table below presents information about reported segments for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002:
|
Desktop Integration |
|
Messaging and Application Engineering |
|
Total |
||||||
|
September 30, 2002 |
|
September 30, 2002 |
|
September 30, 2002 |
||||||
|
Three months ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
Three months ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
Three months ended |
|
Nine months ended |
Total revenue |
$ 690 |
|
$ 1,066 |
|
$ 133 |
|
$ 834 |
|
$ 823 |
|
$ 1,900 |
Total cost of revenue |
1,215 |
|
5,706 |
|
30 |
|
1,912 |
|
1,245 |
|
7,618 |
Gross profit/(loss) |
(525) |
|
(4,640) |
|
103 |
|
(1,078) |
|
(422) |
|
(5,718) |
Total operating expenses |
1,363 |
|
6,316 |
|
80 |
|
233 |
|
1,443 |
|
6,549 |
Segment profitability |
$ (1,888) |
|
$ (10,956) |
|
$ 23 |
|
$ (1,311) |
|
$ (1,865) |
|
$ (12,267) |
A reconciliation of total segment operating expenses to total operating expenses for the quarters ended September 30:
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
||||
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
||||
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
Total segment operating expenses |
$ 1,283 |
|
$ 1,443 |
|
$ 4,162 |
|
$ 6,549 |
(Gain)/loss on disposal of assets |
(6) |
|
(21) |
|
(19) |
|
317 |
Restructuring |
(834) |
|
-- |
|
(834) |
|
1,300 |
Total operating expenses. |
$ 443 |
|
$ 1,422 |
|
$ 3,309 |
|
$ 8,166 |
A reconciliation of total segment profitability to loss before provision for income taxes for the quarters ended September 30:
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
||||
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
||||
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
Total segment profitability |
$ (3,017) |
|
$ (1,865) |
|
$ (7,901) |
|
$(12,267) |
Change in fair value of derivative. |
(242) |
|
(32) |
|
(135) |
|
2,657 |
Gain/(loss) on disposal of assets. |
6 |
|
21 |
|
19 |
|
(317) |
Restructuring |
834 |
|
-- |
|
834 |
|
(1,300) |
Gain/(loss) on closure of subsidiaries. |
-- |
|
-- |
|
(499) |
|
-- |
Interest and other income/(expense), net. |
(49) |
|
(72) |
|
(184) |
|
(498) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loss before income taxes |
$ (2,468) |
|
$ (1,948) |
|
$ (7,866) |
|
$(11,725) |
The following table presents a summary of assets by segment:
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
||
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
Desktop Integration |
$ 5,025 |
|
$ 9,149 |
Messaging and Application Engineering |
-- |
|
80 |
Total assets |
$ 5,025 |
|
$ 9,229 |
12 |
NOTE 11. CONTINGENCIES
Litigation. In January 2003, an action was brought against the Company in the Circuit Court of Loudon County, Virginia for a breach of a real estate lease. The case was settled in August 2003. Under the terms of the settlement agreement, the Company agreed to assign a Note receivable with recourse equal to the unpaid portion of the Note should the note obligor default on future payments. The unpaid balance of the Note being transferred is $555 and matures in December 2007. The Company assessed the probability of liability under the recourse provisions using a weighted probability cash flow analysis and has recognized a long-term liability in the amount of $131.
NOTE 12. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Subsequent to September 30, 2003, the Company completed a common stock financing round wherein it raised $853 of capital. The offering closed on October 15, 2003. The Company sold 1,894,444 shares of common stock at a price of $0.45 per share for a total of $853 in proceeds and issued warrants to purchase 473,611 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.45. The warrants expire three years from the date of grant. As part of an agreement with Liraz Systems Ltd, the guarantor of the Company’s term loan, the Company used $200 of the proceeds to reduce the principal outstanding on the term loan to $1,971.
In addition, the Company has reached an agreement with Liraz Systems Ltd to extend its guaranty on the Company’s term loan and with Bank Hapoalim, the note holder, to extend the maturity date on the loan to November 15, 2004. Under the terms of the agreement with Liraz, the Company has agreed to issue 300,000 shares of its common stock. Of that amount, 150,000 shares would be issued immediately and the balance would be issued on a pro rata basis on March 31, 2004, June 30, 2004 and September 30, 2004, provided that the loan is still outstanding.
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
General Information
Level 8 Systems is a global provider of business integration software that enables organizations to integrate new and existing information and processes at the desktop with Cicero. Business integration software addresses the emerging need for a company's information systems to deliver enterprise-wide views of a company's business information processes.
In addition to software products, Level 8 also provides technical support, training and consulting services as part of its commitment to providing its customers industry-leading integration solutions. Level 8’s worldwide consulting team has in-depth experience in developing successful enterprise-class solutions as well as valuable insight into the business information needs of customers in the Global 5000. Level 8 offers services around its integration software products.
This discussion contains forward-looking statements relating to such matters as anticipated financial performance, business prospects, technological developments, new products, research and development activities, liquidity and capital resources and similar matters. The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a safe harbor for forward-looking statements. In order to comply with the terms of the safe harbor, the Company notes that a variety of factors, briefly described below under the subtitle “Forward-Looking and Cautionary Statements,” could cause its actual results to differ materially from the anticipated results or other expectations expressed in the Company's forward-looking statements.
The Company's results of operations include the operations of the Company and its subsidiaries. During 2002, the Company identified the assets of the Systems Integration segment as being held for sale and thus a discontinued operation. Accordingly, the assets and liabilities have been reclassified to assets held for sale and the results of operations of that segment are now reclassified as gain or loss from a discontinued business. Unless otherwise indicated, all information is presented in thousands (‘000s).
Due to the Company’s acquisition and divestiture activities, year-to-year comparisons of results of operations are not necessarily meaningful. Additionally, as a result of the Company’s pursuit of a growth strategy focusing on its software product sales and synergies gained as a result of eliminating duplicative functions, the results of operations are significantly different than the result of combining the previous operations of each acquired company into Level 8. Pro forma comparisons are therefore not necessarily meaningful. In 2001, the Company began to shift its primary focus from selling multiple Enterprise Application Integration (“EAI”) products to selling Cicero, a desktop integration package, to the financial services industry with a decreased focus on services. During the last two fiscal quarters of 2001, the Company sold most of the products that comprised its Messaging and Applica tion Engineering segment.
In 2002, the Company continued to reorganize and concentrate on the emerging desktop integration market and continued to dispose of non-strategic assets with the sale of the Star SQL and CTRC products from the Messaging and Application Engineering segment and the Geneva Enterprise Integrator and Business Process Automator from what was formerly the Systems Integration segment.
13 |
Results of Operations
The table below presents information about reported segments for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002:
|
Desktop Integration |
|
Messaging and Application Engineering |
|
Total |
||||||
|
September 30, 2003 |
|
September 30, 2003 |
|
September 30, 2003 |
||||||
|
Three months ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
Three months ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
Three months ended |
|
Nine months ended |
Total revenue |
$ 100 |
|
$ 375 |
|
$ 13 |
|
$ 58 |
|
$ 113 |
|
$ 433 |
Total cost of revenue |
1,847 |
|
4,099 |
|
-- |
|
73 |
|
1,847 |
|
4,172 |
Gross profit/(loss) |
(1,747) |
|
(3,724) |
|
13 |
|
(15) |
|
(1,734) |
|
(3,739) |
Total operating expenses |
1,220 |
|
3,956 |
|
63 |
|
206 |
|
1,283 |
|
4,162 |
Segment profitability |
$ (2,967) |
|
$ (7,680) |
|
$ (50) |
|
$ (221) |
|
$ (3,017) |
|
$ (7,901) |
The table below presents information about reported segments for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002:
|
Desktop Integration |
|
Messaging and Application Engineering |
|
Total |
||||||
|
September 30, 2002 |
|
September 30, 2002 |
|
September 30, 2002 |
||||||
|
Three months ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
Three months ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
Three months ended |
|
Nine months ended |
Total revenue |
$ 690 |
|
$ 1,066 |
|
$ 133 |
|
$ 834 |
|
$ 823 |
|
$ 1,900 |
Total cost of revenue |
1,215 |
|
5,706 |
|
30 |
|
1,912 |
|
1,245 |
|
7,618 |
Gross profit/(loss) |
(525) |
|
(4,640) |
|
103 |
|
(1,078) |
|
(422) |
|
(5,718) |
Total operating expenses |
1,363 |
|
6,316 |
|
80 |
|
233 |
|
1,443 |
|
6,549 |
Segment profitability |
$ (1,888) |
|
$ (10,956) |
|
$ 23 |
|
$ (1,311) |
|
$ (1,865) |
|
$ (12,267) |
14 |
Revenue and Gross Margin. The Company has three categories of revenue: software products, maintenance, and services. Software products revenue is comprised primarily of fees from licensing the Company's proprietary software products. Maintenance revenue is comprised of fees for maintaining, supporting, and providing periodic upgrades to the Company's software products. Services revenue is comprised of fees for consulting and training services related to the Company's software products.
The Company's revenues vary from quarter to quarter, due to market conditions, the budgeting and purchasing cycles of customers and the effectiveness of the Company’s sales force. Additionally, the Company has experienced a longer than expected sales cycle for Cicero, due in large part to the inimitable nature of the product as well as concerns of potential customers about the financial viability of the Company. The Company is attempting to solve the former problem by improving the market’s knowledge and understanding of Cicero through increased marketing and leveraging its limited number of reference accounts. The Company is attempting to address the financial concerns of potential customers by pursuing strategic partnerships with companies with significant financial resources although the Company has not experienced significant success to date with this approach. The Company typica lly does not have any material backlog of unfilled software orders and product revenue in any quarter is substantially dependent upon orders received in that quarter. Because the Company's operating expenses are based on anticipated revenue levels and are relatively fixed over the short term, variations in the timing of the recognition of revenue can cause significant variations in operating results from quarter to quarter. Fluctuations in operating results may result in volatility of the price of the Company's common stock.
Total revenues decreased 86% for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 from the same period in 2002. The decrease in revenues is primarily the result of two factors: a reduction in maintenance revenues resulting from the sale of the Star SQL and CTRC products in June 2002 and a reduction in billable service revenues in the current quarter. Service revenues for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 amounted to approximately $471, which was primarily the result of integration services for a Cicero installation. Gross profit margins were (1,534)% for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 and (51)% for the quarter ended September 30, 2002.
Software Products. Software product revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2003 decreased approximately 97% from those results achieved in the same period in 2002, however, the absolute dollar change was immaterial. For the nine months ended September 30, 2003, software revenues decreased 80% or approximately $352.
The gross margin on software products was (17,156)% for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 and reflects the amortization and impairment of acquired software not offset by revenues. Conversely, in the similar quarter in 2002, gross margin on software products was (160)%. Cost of software is composed primarily of amortization of software product technology, amortization of capitalized software costs for internally developed software and royalties to third parties, and to a lesser extent, production and distribution costs. For the quarter ended September 30, 2003 and in accordance with FASB 86, "Accounti ng for the Costs of Computer Software to Be Sold, Leased, or Otherwise Marketed", the Company completed an assessment of the recoverability of the Cicero product technology. This assessment was completed due to the Company’s continued operating losses and the limited software revenue generated by the Cicero technology over the past twelve to eighteen months. Currently, the Company is in negotiations with numerous customers to purchase licenses, which would have a significant impact on the cash flows from the Cicero technology and the Company. Since the negotiations have been in process for several months and expected completion of the transactions has been delayed, the Company has reduced its cash flow projections. Historical cash flows generated by the Cicero technology do not support the long-lived asset and accordingly the Company has impaired the unamortized book value of the technology in excess of the expected net realizable value as of September 30, 2003. This impairment charge, in the amount of $745, has been recorded in cost of software revenue
The Company expects to see significant increases in software sales related to the Desktop Integration segment coupled with improving margins on software products as Cicero gains acceptance in the marketplace, although such acceptance is taking longer than the Company originally anticipated, due in large part to the concerns of potential customers about the financial viability of the Company. The Company’s expectations are based on its review of the sales cycle that has developed around the Cicero product since being released by the Company, its review of the pipeline of prospective customers and their anticipated capital expenditure commitments and budgeting cycles, as well as the status of in-process proof of concepts or beta sites with select corporations. The Messaging and Application Engineering segment revenue is expected to decrease significantly along with related expenses as the majority of the products comprising this segment have been sold.
Maintenance. Maintenance revenue for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 increased by approximately 186% or $52 as compared to the similar quarter for 2002. The increase in maintenance is primarily due to amortization of deferred maintenance revenues that resulted from Q4 2002 license sales. For the nine months ended September 30, 2003, maintenance revenues decreased by approximately 52% or $264 as compared to the same period of the previous year. The decline in overall maintenance revenues is primarily due to the sale of the Star SQL and CTRC products in June 2002.
The Desktop Integration segment accounted for approximately 84% of total maintenance revenue for the quarter. The Messaging and Application Engineering segment accounted for approximately 16% of total maintenance revenues.
Cost of maintenance is comprised of personnel costs and related overhead and the cost of third-party contracts for the maintenance and support of the Company’s software products. Gross margins on maintenance products decreased significantly for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 to (23.8)%, down from 60.7% from one year ago.
The Desktop Integration segment had a negative gross margin of 47.8% for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 as future sales of the Cicero product are subject to favorable proofs-of–concepts at several large installations. The Messaging and Application Engineering segment incurred no cost of maintenance resulting in a gross margin of approximately 100% for the quarter.
Maintenance revenues are expected to increase, primarily in the Desktop Integration segment if license revenues in that segment increase. The majority of the products comprising the Messaging and Application Engineering segment have been sold and thus future revenues will be significantly lower. The cost of maintenance should remain constant for the Desktop Integration segment and the Messaging and Application Engineering segment.
15 |
Services. Services revenue for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, decreased by approximately 94.9% or $447. For the nine months ended September 30, 2003, service revenues amounted to $98, a decrease of 89.7% or $851 for the same period of the previous year. The overall decline in service revenues was the result of a significant integration project during the third quarter of 2002 and no substantial integration projects in the third quarter of 2003.
Cost of services primarily includes personnel and travel costs related to the delivery of services. Services gross margins were (712.5)%, for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, as compared to 16.6% for the same period in 2002.
The Desktop Integration segment accounted for approximately 100% of the total services revenue. The Messaging and Application Engineering segment consists primarily of maintenance revenue as the majority of the relevant products have been sold. Services revenues are expected to increase for the Desktop Integration segment as the Cicero product gains acceptance.
Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expenses primarily include personnel costs for salespeople, marketing personnel, travel and related overhead, as well as trade show participation and promotional expenses. For the quarter ended September 30, 2003, sales and marketing expenses decreased by 36.3%, or approximately $211 due to a reduction in the Company’s sales and marketing compensation plans as well as a reduction in workforce specifically related to the Star SQL and CTRC products that were sold in June 2002.
Sales and marketing expenses are expected to remain fairly constant now that the Company’s restructuring efforts are complete. The Company's emphasis for the sales and marketing groups will be the Desktop Integration segment. For the nine months ended September 30, 2003, sales and marketing expenses decreased by 35.8% or $796.
Research and Development. Research and development expenses primarily include personnel costs for product authors, product developers and product documentation and related overhead. Research and development expense decreased by 14.5% or approximately $45 in the period ending September 30, 2003, as compared to the same period in 2002. The decrease in costs in 2003 reflects the restructuring efforts associated with the closure of the Berkeley, California facility and the associated development staff. For the nine months ended September 30, 2003, research and development expenses decreased by 50.4% or $784 over the same period of the previous year and reflects the restructuring efforts initiated in 2002.
The Company intends to continue to make a significant investment in research and development on its Cicero product while enhancing efficiencies in this area.
General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses consist of personnel costs for the executive, legal, financial, human resources, IT and administrative staff, related overhead, and all non-allocable corporate costs of operating the Company. General and administrative expenses for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 increased by 17.4% or $96 over the same period in the prior year. The primary reason for the increase is primarily influenced by the recovery of approximately $200 of bad debts in the third quarter of 2002. For the nine months ended September 30, 2003, general and administrative expenses decreased by 29.2% or $807 over the same period of the previous year.
General and administrative expenses are expected to decrease slightly going forward as the Company continues to create certain efficiencies and consolidations.
Restructuring. As discussed in the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, the Company has completed restructurings in 2001 and 2002. In August 2003, the Company settled pending litigation for past due and future rents. Accordingly, the Company has reversed the remaining balance of the accrued restructuring charges.
16 |
Change in Fair Value of Warrant Liability. The Company has recorded a warrant liability for derivatives in accordance with EITF 00-19, “Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in a Company’s Own Stock”, for its common stock warrants with redemption features outside the control of the Company. The fair value of the warrants as of September 30, 2003, has been determined using valuation techniques consistent with the valuation performed as of December 31, 2002, and recorded as a warrant liability. As a result of the valuation, the Company has recorded a change in the fair value of the warrant liability of ($242).
Provision for Taxes. The Company’s effective income tax rate for continuing operations differs from the statutory rate primarily because an income tax benefit was not recorded for the net loss incurred in the second quarter of 2003 or 2002. Because of the Company’s recurring losses, the deferred tax assets have been fully offset by a valuation allowance.
Segment Profitability. Segment profitability represents loss before income taxes, interest and other income (expense), amortization of goodwill, restructuring charges, gain (loss) on sale of assets, and impairment charges. Segment profitability for the three months ended September 30, 2003 was ($3.0) million as compared to ($1.9) million for the same period of the previous year. The increase in the loss before income taxes, interest and other income and expense, amortization of goodwill, restructuring charges, gain or loss on sale of assets and impairment charges is primarily attributable to the sale of Star SQL and CTRC products that were sold in June 2002, as well as the impact of an impairment in the net realizable value of the Cicero technology in the amount of $745 which was recognized as of September 30, 2003.
Segment profitability is not a measure of performance under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America, and should not be considered as a substitute for net income, cash flows from operating activities and other income or cash flow statement data prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America, or as a measure of profitability or liquidity. We have included information concerning segment profitability as one measure of our cash flow and historical ability to service debt and because we believe investors find this information useful. Segment profitability as defined herein may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies.
Impact of Inflation. Inflation has not had a significant effect on the Company’s operating results during the periods presented.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Operating and Investing Activities
The Company utilized $129 of cash for the nine months ended September 30, 2003.
Operating activities utilized approximately $3.7 million of cash, which is primarily comprised of the loss from operations of $8.0 million, offset by non-cash charges for depreciation and amortization of approximately $2.4 million and approximately $.8 million for impairment of software product technology. In addition, the Company generated $1.4 million in cash through a reduction in accounts receivable and used approximately $.6 million in fulfillment of its obligations to its creditors through its accounts payable and other accrued liabilities. The significant reduction in accounts receivable is the result of the reduction in overall revenues in the Desktop Integration segment from the last quarter of 2002.
Financing activities generated approximately $867 of cash as a result of a payment of certain notes receivable.
The Company generated approximately $2.7 million in cash during the first nine months of 2003 from financing activities from the proceeds of the sale of Series D Preferred Stock of approximately $3.5 million offset by cash held in escrow of $775.
17 |
By comparison, in 2002, the Company utilized approximately $403 in cash during the first nine months.
Net cash used in operations during the first nine months of 2002 was approximately $6.8 million, which is primarily comprised of the net loss for the period of $18.1 million, offset by non-cash charges for depreciation and amortization of approximately $7.4 million and a non-cash adjustment to the fair value of the warrant liability of $2.7. In addition, the Company had a reduction in accounts receivable of $1.0 million due to the reduction in overall revenues resulting from the sale of substantially all of the Messaging and Application Engineering products as well as the impending sale of the Systems Integration segment, which occurred October 1, 2002. The Company used approximately $1.3 million for fulfillment of its obligations to creditors through its accounts payable and other accrued liabilities and a reduction in its deferred liabilities of $1.8 million. The Company also segregated certain assets and liabilities of the Systems Integration segm ent as being held for sale. Net assets being segregated amounted to approximately $8.2 million as of September 30, 2002.
Net cash generated from investing activities during 2002 was $3.7 million, which consisted of approximately $1.0 million in final proceeds from the sale of the Geneva AppBuilder assets, approximately $2.0 million from the collection of Notes Receivable, approximately $500 from proceeds of sale of assets, and approximately $145 from the sale of marketable securities.
The Company generated approximately $2.9 million of cash during the first nine months of 2002 for financing activities from the proceeds of two investment rounds. In January 2002, the Company closed on an additional round of investment from several new investors (approximately $3.5 million) offset by approximately $1.6 million that was received prior to the end of the year from the same investor group. In addition, in August 2002, the Company completed a Series C Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock offering wherein it raised an additional $1.4 million of cash. As part of its agreement with Liraz as the guarantor on the outstanding bank loan, the Company used approximately 10% of the proceeds ($638) from its financings and asset sales to pay down the principal on the loan.
Financing Activities
The Company funded its cash needs during the quarter ended September 30, 2003 with cash on hand from June 30, 2003, with cash from operations and with the cash realized from certain of the proceeds from the sale of the Series D Preferred Stock which was released from escrow as well as from the exercise of warrants.
The Company has a $2,171 term loan bearing interest at LIBOR plus 1% (approximately 2.34% at September 30, 2003), interest on which is payable semi-annually. There are no financial covenants and the term loan is guaranteed by Liraz, the Company’s former principal shareholder. As discussed in Note 12 above, the Company has reached an agreement with Liraz Systems Ltd as well as Bank Hapoalim to extend the Note and the guaranty until November 15, 2004. As compensation for the extension of the guaranty, the Company has agreed to issue 150,000 shares of its common stock to Liraz Systems Ltd as well as 50,000 shares to be granted on March 31, 2004, June 30, 2004 and September 30, 2004 if the loan balance continues to be outstanding.
In September 2003, the Company borrowed $40 under a secured note from Anthony Pizi, Chief Executive Officer of the Company at 1% per month. The note was repaid in full October 16, 2003.
Subsequent to September 30, 2003, the Company completed a common stock financing round wherein it raised $853 of capital. The offering closed on October 15, 2003. The Company sold 1,894,444 shares of common stock at a purchase price of $0.45 per share for a total of $853 in proceeds and issued warrants to purchase 473,611 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.45. The warrants expire three years from the date of grant. As part of an agreement with Liraz Systems Ltd, the guarantor of the Company’s term loan, the Company used $200 of the proceeds to reduce the principal outstanding on the term loan to $1,971.
18 |
On March 19, 2003, the Company completed a $3.5 million private placement of Series D Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock (“Series D Preferred Stock”), convertible at a conversion ratio of $0.32 per share of common stock into an aggregate of 11,031,250 shares of common stock. As part of the financing, the Company has also issued warrants to purchase an aggregate of 4,158,780 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.07 per share (“Series D-1 Warrants”). On October 10, 2003, the Company, consistent with its obligations, also issued warrants to purchase an aggregate of 1,665,720 shares of common stock at an exercise price the lesser of $0.20 per share or market price at the time of exercise (“Series D-2 Warrants”). The Series D-2 Warrants became exercisable on November 1, 2003, because the Company failed to report $6 million in gross revenues for the nine month period ended September 30, 2003. Both existing and new investors participated in the financing. The Company also agreed to register the common stock issuable upon conversion of the Series D Preferred Stock and exercise of the warrants for resale under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
As part of the financing, the Company and the lead investors agreed to form a joint venture to exploit the Cicero technology in the Asian market. The terms of the agreement required that the Company deposit $1,000,000 of the gross proceeds from the financing into escrow to fund the joint venture. The escrow agreement allows for the immediate release of funds to cover organizational costs of the joint venture. During the quarter ended March 31, 2003, $225 of escrowed funds was released. If the joint venture is not formed and operational on or by July 17, 2003, the lead investors will have the right, but not the obligation, to require the Company to purchase $1,000,000 in liquidation value of the Series D Preferred Stock at a 5% per annum premium, less their pro-rata share of expenses.
The Company and the lead investors agreed to extend the deadline for the formation of the joint venture and approval of the operating plan until November 21, 2003. As such, all funds (less the $225 released in the first quarter of 2003) remain in escrow pending finalization of the formation of the joint venture and approval of the operating plan.
Another condition of the financing required the Company to place an additional $1,000,000 of the gross proceeds into escrow, pending the execution of a definitive agreement with Merrill Lynch providing for the sale of all right, title and interest to the Cicero technology. Since a transaction with Merrill Lynch for the sale of Cicero was not consummated by May 18, 2003, the lead investors have the right, but not the obligation, to require the Company to purchase $1,000,000 in liquidation value of the Series D Preferred Stock at a 5% per annum premium.
The Company and the lead investor had agreed during the quarter ended June 30, 2003 to extend the escrow provisions while the Company negotiated certain amendments to the license agreement with Merrill Lynch. During the quarter ended June 30, 2003, approximately $390 of the escrowed funds was released to the Company. Subsequent to June 30, 2003, the Company amended its license agreement for the Cicero technology with Merrill Lynch. As a result of this amendment, the lead investors agreed to release to the Company the remaining portion of the $1,000 in escrowed funds ($610) associated with the Company’s obligation to acquire Cicero. The Company applied $100 of this amount to its outstanding term loan.
The Company has incurred losses of $18 million and $105 million in the past two years and has experienced negative cash flows from operations for each of the past three years. For the nine months ended September 30, 2003, the Company incurred a loss from operations of $8 million and had a working capital deficiency of approximately $6.3 million. The Company’s future revenues are entirely dependent on acceptance of a newly developed and marketed product, Cicero, which has limited success in commercial markets to date Accordingly, there is substantial doubt that the Company can continue as a going concern. In order to address these issues and to obtain adequate financing for the Company’s operations for the next twelve months, the Company is actively promoting and expanding its Cicero related product line and continues to negotiate with significant customers that have begun or finalized the “proof of concept” stage with the Cicero technology. The Company is experiencing difficulty increasing sales revenue largely because of the inimitable nature of the product as well as customer concerns about the financial viability of the Company. The Company is attempting to solve the former problem by improving the market’s knowledge and understanding of Cicero through increased marketing and leveraging its limited number of reference accounts. The Company is attempting to address the financial concerns of potential customers by pursuing strategic partnerships with companies that have significant financial resources although the Company has not experienced significant success to date with this approach. Additionally, the Company is seeking additional equity capital or other strategic transactions in the near term to provide additional liquidity. There can be no assurance that management will be successful in executing these strategies as anticipated or in a timely manner or that increased revenues will red uce further operating losses. If the Company is unable to significantly increase cash flow or obtain additional financing, it will likely be unable to generate sufficient capital to fund operations for the next twelve months and may be required to pursue other means of financing that may not be on terms favorable to the Company or its stockholders.
19 |
FORWARD-LOOKING AND CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS
Certain statements contained in this Quarterly Report may constitute "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 ("Reform Act"). We may also make forward-looking statements in other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, in materials delivered to shareholders, in press releases and in other public statements. Forward-looking statements provide current expectations of future events based on certain assumptions and include any statement that does not directly relate to any historical or current fact. Words such as "anticipates," "believes," "expects," "estimates," "intends," "plans," "projects," and similar expressions, may identify such forward looking statements. In accordance with the Reform Act, set forth below are cautionary statements that accompany those forward looking statements. Readers should carefully review these cautionary statements as they identif y certain important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements and from historical trends.
The following cautionary statements are not exclusive and are in addition to other factors discussed elsewhere in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission and in materials incorporated therein by reference: there may be a question as to our ability to operate as a going concern, our future success depends on the market acceptance of the Cicero product and successful execution of the new strategic direction; general economic or business conditions may be less favorable than expected, resulting in, among other things, lower than expected revenues; an unexpected revenue shortfall may adversely affect our business because our expenses are largely fixed; our quarterly operating results may vary significantly because we are not able to accurately predict the amount and timing of individual sales and this may adversely impact our stock price; trends in sales of our products and general economic conditions may affect investors' expectations re garding our financial performance and may adversely affect our stock price; our future results may depend upon the continued growth and business use of the Internet; we may lose market share and be required to reduce prices as a result of competition from its existing competitors, other vendors and information systems departments of customers; we may not have the ability to recruit, train and retain qualified personnel; rapid technological change could render the Company's products obsolete; loss of any one of our major customers could adversely affect our business; our products may contain undetected software errors, which could adversely affect our business; because our technology is complex, we may be exposed to liability claims; we may be unable to enforce or defend its ownership and use of proprietary technology; because we are a technology company, our common stock may be subject to erratic price fluctuations; and we may not have sufficient liquidity and capital resources to meet changing business cond itions.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
As the Company has sold most of its European based business and has closed several European sales offices, the majority of revenues are generated from US sources. The Company expects that trend to continue for the next year. As such, there is minimal foreign currency risk at present.
The Company believes that the effect, if any, of reasonably possible near-term changes in interest rates on the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows would not be material.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company's management, including the Company's President and Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial and Operating Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15. Based upon that evaluation, the Company's President and Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial and Operating Officer, have concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures are effective. There have been no significant changes in the Company's internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation. Management necessarily applied its judgment in assessing the costs and benefits of such controls and procedures, which, by their nature, can provide only rea sonable assurance regarding management’s control objectives.
20 |
Part II. Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Various lawsuits and claims have been brought against the Company in the normal course of business. In January 2003, an action was brought against the Company in the Circuit Court of Loudon County Virginia for a breach of a real estate lease. The case was settled in August 2003. Under the terms of the settlement agreement, the Company agreed to assign a Note receivable with recourse equal to the unpaid portion of the Note should the note obligor default on future payments. The unpaid balance of the Note being transferred is $555 and matures in December 2007. The Company assessed the probability of liability under the recourse provisions using a weighted probability cash flow analysis and has recognized a long-term liability in the amount of $131.
Item 2. Changes in Securities
None
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
The Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company was held on July 30,2003.
The following is a brief description of each matter voted upon at the meeting and the number of affirmative votes and the number of negative votes cast with respect to each matter.
a) The stockholders elected the following persons as directors of the Company: Anthony Pizi, Frank Artale, Nicholas Hatalski, Bruce Hasenyager, Ken Nielsen, and Jay Kingley. The votes for and against (withheld) for each nominee were as follows:
|
Votes For |
Votes Withheld |
Anthony Pizi |
27,796,501 |
86,433 |
Frank Artale |
27,797,140 |
85,794 |
Nicholas Hatalski |
27,796,540 |
86,394 |
Bruce Hasenyager |
27,797,055 |
85,879 |
Ken Nielsen |
27,796,440 |
86,494 |
Jay Kingley |
27,796,412 |
86,522 |
b) The stockholders were asked to approve the amendment to the Company’s certificate of incorporation to increase the number of shares of authorized shares of common stock from 60,000,000 to 85,000,000. The proposal was approved with 18,374,263 shares voting for, 334,355 shares voting against, and 6,614 shares abstained.
c) The stockholders were asked to approve the amendment increasing the total number of shares of common stock issuable pursuant to the Company’s 1997 Stock Option Plan from 6,500,000 to 10,000,000. The proposal was approved with 27,541,965 shares voting for, 385,660 shares voting against, and 8,879 shares abstained.
d) The stockholders ratified the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent accountants by a vote of 27,778,689 shares voting for, 74,974 shares voting against, and 29,271 shares abstained.
Item 5. Other Information
None
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) Exhibits
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
None
21 |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
Level 8 Systems, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Anthony Pizi |
Date: November 19, 2003 |
Anthony Pizi |
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ John Broderick |
Date: November 19, 2003 |
John Broderick |
|
Chief Financial Officer/Chief Operating Office |
22 |
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION
I, Anthony C. Pizi, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 of Level 8 Systems, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.
4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Date: November 19, 2003 |
|
|
|
|
By: /s/ Anthony C. Pizi |
|
Anthony C. Pizi |
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
(Principal Executive Officer) |
23 |
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION
I, John P. Broderick, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 of Level 8 Systems, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.
4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Date: November 19, 2003 |
|
|
|
|
By: /s/ John P. Broderick |
|
John P. Broderick |
|
Chief Financial and Operating Officer |
24 |
Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Level 8 Systems, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 (the "Report"), I, Anthony C. Pizi, Chief Executive Officer, and, I, John P. Broderick, Chief Financial and Operating Officer, each certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|
By: /s/ Anthony C. Pizi |
|
Anthony C. Pizi |
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
November 19, 2003 |
|
|
|
By: /s/ John P. Broderick |
|
John P. Broderick |
|
Chief Financial and Operating Officer |
|
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|
November 19, 2003 |
|
|
25 |