UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002
Commission File No. 333-89521
CE GENERATION, LLC
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware 47-0818523
-------- -------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
Incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
302 South 36th Street, Suite 400 Omaha, 68131
---------------------------------------- -----
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (402) 341-4500
--------------
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: N/A
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: N/A
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to
such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item
405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein and will not be contained, to
the best of each of the registrants' knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form
10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as
defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes [ ] No [X]
The members' equity accounts are held 50% by MidAmerican Energy Holdings
Company and 50% by TransAlta USA Inc. as of March 28, 2003.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I
Item 1. Business .................................................. 3
Item 2. Properties ................................................ 12
Item 3. Legal Proceedings.......................................... 13
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders........ 14
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related
Stockholder's Matters ................................... 15
Item 6. Selected Financial Data ................................... 16
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations ..................... 17
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk. 25
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data ............... 26
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting
and Financial Disclosure Data............................ 51
PART III
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant......... 52
Item 11. Executive Compensation .................................... 53
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
Management and Related Stockholder Matters............... 53
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions ............ 53
Item 14. Controls and Procedures.................................... 54
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on
Form 8-K ................................................ 55
SIGNATURES............................................................... 57
CERTIFICATIONS........................................................... 58
Exhibit Index ........................................................... 60
-2-
PART I
DISCLOSURE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This report contains statements that do not directly or exclusively relate to
historical facts. These statements are "forward-looking statements" within the
meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. You can
typically identify forward-looking statements by the use of forward-looking
words, such as "may", "will", "could", "project", "believe", "anticipate",
"expect", "estimate", "continue", "potential", "plan", "forecast" and similar
terms. These statements represent CE Generation, LLC's intentions, plans,
expectations and beliefs and are subject to risks, uncertainties and other
factors. Many of these factors are outside CE Generation, LLC's control and
could cause actual results to differ materially from such forward-looking
statements. These factors include, among others:
o general economic and business conditions in the jurisdictions in which
CE Generation, LLC's facilities are located;
o governmental, statutory, regulatory or administrative initiatives
affecting CE Generation, LLC or the power generation industries;
o weather effects on sales and revenues;
o general industry trends;
o increased competition in the power generation industry;
o availability of qualified personnel;
o financial or regulatory accounting principles or policies imposed by
the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the Financial
Accounting Standards Board ("FASB"), the Securities and Exchange
Commission ("SEC") and similar entities with regulatory oversight; and
o other business considerations that may be disclosed from time to time
in CE Generation, LLC's SEC filings or in other publicly disseminated
written documents.
CE Generation, LLC undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any
forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future
events or otherwise. The foregoing review of factors should not be construed as
exclusive.
ITEM 1. BUSINESS.
GENERAL
CE Generation, LLC ("CE Generation" or the "Company"), is a Delaware limited
liability company created by MidAmerican Energy Holdings Company ("MEHC" or
"MidAmerican") on February 8, 1999, for the sole purpose of issuing securities
and holding the equity investments in certain subsidiaries. On March 3, 1999,
MEHC sold 50% of its ownership interest in CE Generation to El Paso CE
Generation Holding Company, which was subsequently merged into El Paso Merchant
Energy North America Company ("EPME") on December 31, 2000, an indirect
subsidiary of El Paso Corporation ("El Paso"). On January 29, 2003, EPME sold
all its interest in CE Generation to TransAlta USA Inc. ("TransAlta"), an
affiliate of TransAlta Corporation (TransAlta and EPME are sometimes referred to
individually as the "Class A Holder").
Due to the then pending merger of MEHC with an electric utility, MEHC was
required to divest a portion of its ownership interests in the Company's power
projects in order to permit those projects to maintain their status as
qualifying facilities ("QFs") under the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act
of 1978 ("PURPA"). This law requires that a non-electric utility own at least
50% of a QF. The sale to EPME, which did not own an electric utility, was
intended to permit the Company's power projects to satisfy this ownership
requirement. By maintaining QF status, the Company's power projects are entitled
to an exemption from federal and state utility regulation under PURPA and are
able to maintain compliance with the provisions of their current power purchase
agreements which require that they be QFs during the term of those agreements.
-3-
The Company's limited liability company operating agreement provides that
MidAmerican and the Class A Holder, currently TransAlta, each are entitled to
appoint 50% of the directors and are entitled to 50% of the distributions made
by the Company.
CE Generation owns all of the common stock interests in Magma Power Company
("Magma"), FSRI Holdings, Inc. ("FSRI") and California Energy Development
Corporation ("CEDC") and their subsidiaries. Through its subsidiaries, CE
Generation is primarily engaged in the development, ownership and operation of
environmentally responsible independent power production facilities in the
United States utilizing geothermal and natural gas resources.
The principal executive office of CE Generation is located at 302 South 36th
Street, Omaha, Nebraska 68131 and its telephone number is (402) 341-4500.
In this Annual Report references to MW means megawatts, MWh means megawatt
hours, kW means kilowatts, kWh means kilowatt hours and MMBtus means million
British thermal units.
-4-
THE PROJECTS
CE Generation has an aggregate net ownership interest of 757 MW of electrical
generating capacity in power plants in operation in the United States, which
have an aggregate net capacity of 817 MW. Set forth below is a table describing
certain characteristics of CE Generation's projects as of December 31, 2002:
POWER
FACILITY NET PURCHASE
CAPACITY NET MW AGREEMENT
OPERATING PROJECT (MW)(1) OWNED(1) LOCATION EXPIRATION POWER PURCHASER(2)
- ------------------------------- ------------ -------- -------- ---------- ------------------
GEOTHERMAL FACILITIES:
Salton Sea Projects
Salton Sea I................. 10 10 California 2017 Edison
Salton Sea II................ 20 20 California 2020 Edison
Salton Sea III............... 50 50 California 2019 Edison
Salton Sea IV................ 40 40 California 2026 Edison
Salton Sea V................. 49 49 California Year-to-year El Paso/Minerals(3)
--- ---
Total Salton Sea Projects... 169 169
--- ---
Partnership Projects
Vulcan........................ 34 34 California 2016 Edison
Elmore........................ 38 38 California 2018 Edison
Leathers...................... 38 38 California 2019 Edison
Del Ranch..................... 38 38 California 2019 Edison
CE Turbo...................... 10 10 California Year-to-year El Paso/Minerals(3)
--- ---
Total Partnership Projects... 158 158
--- ---
Total geothermal facilities... 327 327
--- ---
GAS FACILITIES:
Saranac....................... 240 180 New York 2009 NYSEG
Power Resources............... 200 200 Texas 2003 TXU
Yuma.......................... 50 50 Arizona 2024 SDG&E
--- ---
Total gas facilities........... 490 430
--- ---
TOTAL OPERATING PROJECTS....... 817 757
=== ===
(1) Actual MW may vary depending on operating and reservoir conditions and
plant design. Facility Net Capacity (in MW) represents facility gross
capacity (in MW) less parasitic load. Parasitic load is electrical output
used by the facility and not made available for sale to utilities or other
outside purchasers. Net MW owned indicates current legal ownership, but, in
some cases, does not reflect the current allocation of partnership
distributions.
(2) Southern California Edison Company ("Edison"); El Paso Corporation ("El
Paso"); CalEnergy Minerals LLC ("Minerals"), a Zinc Facility owned by a
subsidiary of MidAmerican; New York State Electric & Gas Corporation
("NYSEG"); TXU Generation Company LP ("TXU"); and San Diego Gas & Electric
Company ("SDG&E").
(3) Each contract governing power purchases by Minerals will expire 33 years
from the date of the initial power delivery under such contract. Pursuant
to a Transaction Agreement dated January 29, 2003, Salton Sea Power LLC
("Salton Sea Power") and CE Turbo LLC ("CE Turbo") began selling available
power to TransAlta on February 12, 2003 based on percentages of the Dow
Jones SP-15 Index. Such agreement will expire on October 31, 2003.
-5-
GEOTHERMAL FACILITIES
CE Generation affiliates currently operate ten geothermal plants (the "Imperial
Valley Projects") in the Imperial Valley in California. The "Salton Sea
Projects" consist of the Salton Sea I, Salton Sea II, Salton Sea III, Salton Sea
IV and Salton Sea V Projects (the "Salton Sea I Project", the "Salton Sea II
Project", the "Salton Sea III Project," the "Salton Sea IV Project," and the
"Salton Sea V Project" respectively). The "Partnership Projects" consist of the
Vulcan, Elmore, Leathers, Del Ranch and CE Turbo projects (the "Vulcan Project,"
the "Elmore Project", the "Leathers Project", the "Del Ranch Project," and the
"CE Turbo Project" respectively). The CE Turbo Project and the Salton Sea V
Project commenced commercial operations in 2000.
Each of the Imperial Valley Projects, excluding the Salton Sea V and CE Turbo
Projects, sells electricity to Edison pursuant to a separate Standard Offer No.
4 Agreement ("SO4 Agreement") or a negotiated power purchase agreement. Each
power purchase agreement is independent of the others, and the performance
requirements specified within one such agreement apply only to the project,
which is subject to the agreement. The power purchase agreements provide for
energy payments, capacity payments and capacity bonus payments. Edison makes
fixed annual capacity payments and capacity bonus payments to the applicable
projects to the extent that capacity factors exceed certain benchmarks. The
price for capacity was fixed for the life of the SO4 Agreements and is
significantly higher in the months of June through September.
Energy payments for the SO4 Agreements were at increasing fixed rates for the
first ten years after firm operation and thereafter at a rate based on the cost
that Edison avoids by purchasing energy from the project instead of obtaining
the energy from other sources ("Avoided Cost of Energy"). In June and November
2001, the Imperial Valley Projects, which receive Edison's Avoided Cost of
Energy, entered into agreements that provide for amended energy payments under
the SO4 Agreements. The amendments provide for fixed energy payments per kWh in
lieu of Edison's Avoided Cost of Energy. The fixed energy payment was 3.25 cents
per kWh from December 1, 2001 through April 30, 2002 and is 5.37 cents per kWh
commencing May 1, 2002 for a five-year period. Following the five-year period,
the energy payments revert back to Edison's Avoided Cost of Energy.
For the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively, Edison's
Average Avoided Cost of Energy was 3.5 cents per kWh, 7.4 cents per kWh and 5.8
cents per kWh, respectively. Estimates of Edison's future Avoided Cost of Energy
vary substantially from year to year.
The Salton Sea I Project contracts to sell electricity to Edison pursuant to a
30-year negotiated power purchase agreement, which commenced on July 1, 1987
(the "Salton Sea I PPA"). The contract capacity and contract nameplate are each
10 MW. The capacity payment is based on the firm capacity price, which adjusts
quarterly based on a basket of energy indices for the term of the Salton Sea I
PPA and is currently $154.45 per kW-year. The capacity payment is approximately
$1.1 million per annum. The energy payment is calculated using a Base Price
(defined as the initial value of the energy payment (4.7 cents per kWh for the
second quarter of 1992)), which is subject to quarterly adjustments based on a
basket of indices. The time period weighted average energy payment for Salton
Sea I was 5.8 cents per kWh during 2002. As the Salton Sea I PPA is not an SO4
Agreement, the energy payments do not revert to Edison's Avoided Cost of Energy.
The Salton Sea II Project contracts to sell electricity to Edison pursuant to a
30-year modified SO4 Agreement that commenced on April 5, 1990. The contract
capacity and contract nameplate are 15 MW (16.5 MW during on-peak periods) and
20 MW, respectively. The price for contract capacity and contract capacity bonus
payments is fixed for the life of the modified SO4 Agreement. The annual
capacity and bonus payments are approximately $3.3 million. The energy payments
for the first ten-year period, which period expired on April 4, 2000, were
levelized at a time period weighted average of 10.6 cents per kWh. Thereafter,
the monthly energy payment was based on Edison's Avoided Cost of Energy. Edison
is entitled to receive, at no cost, 5% of all energy delivered in excess of 80%
of contract capacity through September 30, 2004.
The Salton Sea III Project contracts to sell electricity to Edison pursuant to a
30-year modified SO4 Agreement that commenced on February 13, 1989. The contract
capacity and contract nameplate are 47.5 MW and 49.8 MW, respectively. The price
for contract capacity payments and capacity bonus payments is fixed at $175 per
kW per year. The annual capacity and bonus payments are approximately $9.7
million. The energy payments for the first ten-year period, which period expired
on February 12, 1999, were levelized at a time period weighted average of 9.8
cents per kWh. Thereafter, the energy payment has been based on Edison's Avoided
Cost of Energy.
-6-
The Salton Sea IV Project contracts to sell electricity to Edison pursuant to a
modified SO4 Agreement which provides for contract capacity payments on 34 MW of
capacity at two different rates based on the respective contract capacities
deemed attributable to the original Salton Sea I PPA option (20 MW) and to the
original Salton Sea IV SO4 Agreement ("Fish Lake PPA") (14 MW). The capacity
payment price for the 20 MW portion adjusts quarterly based upon specified
indices and the capacity payment price for the 14 MW portion is a fixed
levelized rate. The capacity and bonus payments in 2002, 2001 and 2000 were
approximately $5.5 million, $5.7 million and $5.4 million, respectively. The
energy payment (for deliveries up to a rate of 39.6 MW) is at a base price,
adjusted quarterly based on specified indices, for 55.6% of the total energy
delivered by Salton Sea IV and is based on an energy payment schedule for 44.4%
of the total energy delivered by Salton Sea IV. The contract has a 30-year term
but Edison is not required to purchase the 20 MW of capacity and energy
originally attributable to the Salton Sea I PPA option after September 30, 2017,
the original termination date of the Salton Sea I PPA.
The Salton Sea V Project, which commenced operations in the third quarter of
2000, expects to sell up to 22 MW of its net output to Minerals, pursuant to a
33 year power sales agreement. The agreement provides for energy payments based
on the market rates available to the Salton Sea V Project, adjusted for wheeling
costs. The Salton Sea V Project sells its remaining output through other market
transactions.
The Vulcan Project contracts to sell electricity to Edison under a 30-year SO4
Agreement that commenced on February 10, 1986. The Vulcan Project has a contract
capacity and contract nameplate of 29.5 MW and 34 MW, respectively. The annual
capacity and bonus payments are approximately $5.5 million.
The Elmore Project contracts to sell electricity to Edison under a 30-year SO4
Agreement that commenced on January 1, 1989. The contract capacity and contract
nameplate are 34 MW and 38 MW, respectively. The annual capacity and bonus
payments are approximately $7.9 million.
The Leathers Project contracts to sell electricity to Edison pursuant to a
30-year SO4 Agreement that commenced on January 1, 1990. The contract capacity
and contract nameplate are 34 MW and 38 MW, respectively. The annual capacity
and bonus payments are approximately $7.5 million. The energy payment is based
on Edison's Avoided Cost of Energy.
The Del Ranch Project contracts to sell electricity to Edison under a 30-year
SO4 Agreement that commenced on January 2, 1989. The contract capacity and
contract nameplate are 34 MW and 38 MW, respectively. The annual capacity and
bonus payments are approximately $7.9 million.
The CE Turbo Project, which commenced commercial operation in the third quarter
of 2000, sells its output through market transactions. The CE Turbo Project may
sell its output to Minerals, pursuant to a 33 year power purchase agreement. The
agreement provides for energy payments based on the market rates available to
the CE Turbo Project, adjusted for wheeling costs.
Commencing January 17, 2001, Salton Sea Power and CE Turbo entered into a series
of transaction agreements to sell available power from the Salton Sea V and CE
Turbo Projects to EPME based on day ahead price quotes received from EPME under
the original agreement and based on percentages of the Dow Jones SP-15 Index
thereafter. Pursuant to a Transaction Agreement dated January 29, 2003, Salton
Sea Power and CE Turbo began selling available power to TransAlta on February
12, 2003 based on percentages of the Dow Jones SP-15 Index. Such agreement will
expire on October 31, 2003.
The Imperial Valley Projects, other than the Salton Sea I Project, receive
transmission service from the Imperial Irrigation District to deliver
electricity to Edison near Mirage, California. These projects pay a rate based
on the Imperial Irrigation District's cost of service, which was $1.70 per month
per kilowatt of service provided for 2002 and recalculated annually. The
transmission service and interconnection agreements expire in 2015 for the
Partnership Projects, 2019 for the Salton Sea III Project, 2020 for the Salton
Sea II Project and 2026 for the Salton Sea IV Project. The Salton Sea V and CE
Turbo Projects have entered into 30-year agreements with similar terms with the
Imperial Irrigation District. The Salton Sea I Project delivers energy to Edison
at the project site and has no transmission service agreement with the Imperial
Irrigation District.
-7-
GAS FACILITIES
The Saranac Project is a 240 net MW natural gas-fired cogeneration facility
located in Plattsburgh, New York, which began commercial operation in June 1994.
The Saranac Project has entered into a 15-year power purchase agreement (the
"Saranac PPA") with New York State Electric & Gas ("NYSEG"). The Saranac Project
has entered into 15-year steam purchase agreements (the "Saranac Steam Purchase
Agreements") with Georgia-Pacific Corporation and Tenneco Packaging, Inc. The
Saranac Project has a 15-year natural gas supply contract (the "Saranac Gas
Supply Agreement") with Shell Canada Limited ("Shell Canada") to supply 100% of
the Saranac Project's fuel requirements. Shell Canada is responsible for
production and delivery of natural gas to the U.S.-Canadian border; the gas is
then transported by the North Country Gas Pipeline Corporation ("NCGP") the
remaining 22 miles to the plant. NCGP is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Saranac
Power Partners, L.P. (the "Saranac Partnership") and the Saranac Partnership
also owns the Saranac Project. NCGP also transports gas for NYSEG and
Georgia-Pacific Corporation. Each of the Saranac PPA, the Saranac Steam Purchase
Agreements and the Saranac Gas Supply Agreement contains rates that are fixed
for the respective contract terms. The 2002 Saranac PPA rates escalate at a
higher percentage than the Saranac Gas Supply Agreement rates. The Saranac
Partnership is indirectly owned by subsidiaries of CE Generation, ArcLight
Capital Holdings ("ArcLight") and General Electric Capital Corporation.
The Yuma Project is a 50 net MW natural gas-fired cogeneration project in Yuma,
Arizona providing 50 MW of electricity to San Diego Gas & Electric Company
("SDG&E") under an existing 30-year power purchase contract ("Yuma PPA")
commencing in May 1994. The energy is sold at SDG&E's Avoided Cost of Energy and
the capacity is sold to SDG&E at a fixed price for the life of the Yuma PPA. The
annual capacity payments are approximately $8.4 million. The power is wheeled to
SDG&E over transmission lines constructed and owned by Arizona Public Service
Company ("APS"). The project entity, Yuma Cogeneration Associates ("YCA"), has
executed steam sales contracts with Queen Carpet, Inc. to act as its thermal
host. Since the industrial entity has the right under its agreement to terminate
the agreement upon one year's notice if a change in its technology eliminates
its need for steam, and in any case to terminate the agreement at any time upon
three years notice, there can be no assurance that the Yuma Project will
maintain its status as a Qualified Facility, ("QF"). However, if the industrial
entity terminates the agreement, YCA anticipates that it will be able to locate
an alternative thermal host in order to maintain its status as a QF. A natural
gas supply and transportation agreement has been executed with Southwest Gas
Corporation, terminable under certain circumstances by YCA and Southwest Gas
Corporation.
The Power Resources Project is a 200 net MW natural gas-fired cogeneration
project located near Big Spring, Texas, which has a 15-year power purchase
agreement (the "Power Resources PPA") with Texas Utilities Electric Company
which expires in September 2003. The Power Resources Project began commercial
operation in June 1988. The Power Resources Project is a QF and the project
entity, Power Resources Ltd. ("Power Resources"), entered into a 15-year steam
purchase agreement (the "Power Resources Steam Purchase Agreement") with Fina
Oil and Chemical Company ("Fina"), a subsidiary of Petrofina S.A. of Belgium.
Power Resources entered into an agreement (the "CE Texas Gas Supply Agreement")
with CE Texas Gas L.P. ("CE Texas Gas") an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of
CE Generation, for Power Resources' fuel requirements through December 2003. In
June 1995, CE Texas Gas and Louis Dreyfus Natural Gas Corporation ("Dreyfus")
executed an eight-year natural gas supply agreement (the "CE Texas Gas-Dreyfus
Gas Supply Agreement"), with which CE Texas Gas will fulfill its supply
commitment to the Power Resources Project from October 1995 to the end of the
term of the Power Resources PPA. Each of the Power Resources PPA, the Power
Resources Steam Purchase Agreement and the CE Texas Gas Supply Agreement
contains rates that are fixed for the respective contract terms. The Power
Resources PPA rates escalate at a higher rate than the CE Texas Gas Supply
Agreement rates. Depending upon several market variables, the Power Resources
Project could continue operation after the expiration of the Power Resources
PPA. On December 30, 2002, Power Resources obtained an exempt wholesale
generator order from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. The status as an
exempt wholesale generator would facilitate the Power Resources Project energy
sales in market transactions.
-8-
DESCRIPTION OF THE SECURITIES
The following is a description of important provisions of the Securities. The
following information does not purport to be a complete description of the
Securities and is subject to, and qualified in its entirety by, reference to the
Securities and the indenture. Unless otherwise specified, the following
description applies to all of the Securities.
GENERAL
On March 2, 1999, CE Generation issued securities in the aggregate principal
amount of $400 million, bearing interest from their date of issuance at 7.416%
per annum and finally maturing on December 15, 2018 (the "Securities"). The
Securities are direct senior obligations of CE Generation, issued under the
indenture for the Securities and secured by the collateral.
The indenture provides for the issuance of the Securities and other series of
senior notes or securities as from time to time may be authorized by the
Company, subject to the limitations set forth in the indenture.
COLLATERAL FOR THE SECURITIES
The Securities are secured by the following collateral: (a) all available cash
flow of the assigning subsidiaries deposited with the depository bank; (b) a
pledge of 99% of the equity interests in Salton Sea Power Company and all of the
equity interests in CE Texas Gas LLC, the assigning subsidiaries, and California
Energy Yuma Corporation; (c) a pledge of all of the capital stock of SECI
Holdings Inc.; (d) a grant of a lien on and security interest in the depository
accounts; and (e) a grant of a lien on and security interest in all of CE
Generation's other tangible and intangible property, to the extent it is
possible to grant a lien on the property.
PAYMENT OF INTEREST AND PRINCIPAL
INTEREST
Interest on the Securities is payable semiannually in arrears on each June 15
and December 15 to the registered holders at the close of business on the
preceding June 1 or December 1. Interest is calculated on the basis of a 360-day
year, consisting of twelve 30-day months.
-9-
PRINCIPAL
The remaining balance of the $400 million initial principal amount of the
Securities due December 15, 2018 is payable in semiannual installments, as
follows:
PERCENTAGE OF
INITIAL PRINCIPAL
PAYMENT DATE AMOUNT PAYABLE
------------------------- -----------------
June 15, 2003 ........... 2.25%
December 15, 2003 ....... 2.25%
June 15, 2004 ........... 1.83%
December 15, 2004 ....... 1.83%
June 15, 2005 ........... 1.85%
December 15, 2005 ....... 1.85%
June 15, 2006 ........... 2.40%
December 15, 2006 ....... 2.40%
June 15, 2007 ........... 2.25%
December 15, 2007 ....... 2.25%
June 15, 2008 ........... 3.53%
December 15, 2008 ....... 3.53%
June 15, 2009 ........... 3.08%
December 15, 2009 ....... 3.08%
June 15, 2010 ........... 1.78%
December 15, 2010 ....... 1.78%
June 15, 2011 ........... 1.90%
December 15, 2011 ....... 1.90%
June 15, 2012 ........... 2.56%
December 15, 2012 ....... 2.56%
June 15, 2013 ........... 2.55%
December 15, 2013 ....... 2.55%
June 15, 2014 ........... 3.23%
December 15, 2014 ....... 3.23%
June 15, 2015 ........... 3.38%
December 15, 2015 ....... 3.38%
June 15, 2016 ........... 3.66%
December 15, 2016 ....... 3.66%
June 15, 2017 ........... 3.78%
December 15, 2017 ....... 3.78%
June 15, 2018 ........... 4.55%
December 15, 2018 ....... 4.55%
PRIORITY OF PAYMENTS
All available cash flows received by CE Generation shall be paid into the
Revenue Account maintained by a Depository. Amounts paid into the Revenue
Account shall be distributed in the following order: (a) to pay operating and
administrative costs of CE Generation and it's subsidiaries, excluding those
costs payable to affiliated parties unless such costs are incurred on behalf of
the Company; (b) to pay certain administrative costs of the agents for the
secured parties under the Financing Documents; (c) to pay principal of, premium
(if any) and interest on the Securities and the Debt Service Reserve Bonds, if
any, and interest and certain fees payable to the Debt Service Reserve LOC
provider; (d) to pay principal of Debt Service Reserve LOC Loans and certain
related fees and charges; (e) to replenish any shortfall in the Debt Payment
Account; (f) to replenish any shortfall in the Debt Service Reserve Account; (g)
to pay any remaining amounts to the Distribution Suspense Account.
-10-
DEBT SERVICE RESERVE ACCOUNT
A Debt Service Reserve Fund for the benefit of the Security Holders issued by
Credit Suisse First Boston and Lehman Commercial Paper Inc., which has been
funded by a Debt Service Reserve Letter of Credit Provider has been established
under the Depository Agreement. If the amounts available to be drawn under the
Debt Service Reserve Letter of Credit and all other amounts held in the Debt
Service Reserve Account from time to time do not equal the then current debt
service reserve required balance, the Debt Service Reserve Fund shall be funded
from the Revenue Account subject to the funding of requests described above. The
debt service reserve required balance on any date equals the maximum semiannual
principal and interest payment due on the Securities for the remaining term. Any
Debt Service Reserve Letter of Credit must be issued by a financial institution
rated at least "A" by S&P and "A2" by Moody's.
OPTIONAL REDEMPTION
The Securities are subject to optional redemption, in whole or in part, at any
time on any business day, at a price equal to the redemption price plus a
premium calculated to "make whole" to comparable U.S. Treasury Securities plus
50 basis points.
MANDATORY REDEMPTION--AT PAR
The Securities are subject to mandatory redemption, at par plus accrued interest
to the Redemption Date, (a) upon the occurrence of certain events of loss,
expropriation or title defects related to CE Generation or its subsidiaries; or
(b) if a permitted power contract buy-out occurs, unless the Rating Agencies
confirm the then current rating of the Securities.
MANDATORY REDEMPTION--WITH YIELD MAINTENANCE PREMIUM
The Securities are subject to mandatory redemption, at par plus accrued interest
and a yield maintenance premium to the Redemption Date upon certain project
refinancing or project debt refinancing or upon certain asset or equity
interests sales.
DISTRIBUTIONS
Distributions may be made only from and to the extent of monies on deposit in
the Distribution Suspense Account, on any funding date on which the following
conditions are satisfied:
(a) the debt payment account and the debt service reserve account are funded to
the then current required levels and the payments described in the first,
second, sixth and seventh priorities of payments described above are
satisfied in full;
(b) no default or event of default under the indenture shall have occurred and
be continuing;
(c) the debt service coverage ratio for the preceding four fiscal quarters
ending on or prior to the funding date, measured as one period, is greater
or equal to 1.5 to 1.0;
(d) the projected debt service coverage ratio for the succeeding four fiscal
quarters, including the quarter in which the distribution is to be made,
measured as one period, is greater than or equal to 1.5 to 1.0; and
(e) no material default or event of default has occurred and is continuing
under any project financing document for the Saranac Project, the Power
Resources Project, the Yuma Project or the Imperial Valley Projects.
NATURE OF RECOURSE ON THE SECURITIES
The obligation to pay principal of, premium (if any) and interest on the
Securities are obligations solely of CE Generation, secured by the collateral.
Neither MidAmerican nor the Class A Holder, nor any affiliate, shareholder,
member, officer, director or employee of CE Generation, MidAmerican or the Class
A Holder will guarantee the payment of the Securities or has any obligation with
respect to the Securities (other than the assignment by the assigning
subsidiaries of their available cash flows to secure the obligation to make
payments on the Securities).
-11-
COVENANTS
Principal covenants under the indenture require CE Generation, among other
things, (a) to maintain its existence, (b) comply with applicable laws and
governmental approach, (c) perform required obligations under the financing
documents, (d) maintain the liens on the collateral in favor of the collateral
agent, (e) not to incur any debt except permitted debt and lien upon any of its
properties except permitted liens, and (f) not form any subsidiaries, make
investments, loans or advances or acquisitions, in each case other than as
permitted under the indenture.
EMPLOYEES
Employees necessary for the operation of the CE Generation projects are provided
by CalEnergy Operating Corporation ("CEOC") and Falcon Power Operating Company
("FPOC"), indirect subsidiaries of CE Generation, under operation and
maintenance agreements. As of December 31, 2002, CEOC and FPOC employed 230 and
63 people full-time, respectively.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES.
The Company's most significant physical properties are its current interest in
operating power facilities and its related real property interests. The gas
fired generating facilities are located on land leased or owned by the
respective project companies. The Company maintains an inventory of
approximately 26,000 acres of geothermal property leases in the Salton Sea area
to support the Imperial Valley Projects. The Company, as lessee, pays certain
royalties and other fees to the property owners and other royalty interest
holders from the revenue generated by the Imperial Valley Projects. The Company
also has interests in other geothermal property leases which are unrelated to
its current operating power facilities. Certain of the producing acreage owned
by Magma is leased to Mammoth-Pacific as owner and operator of the Mammoth
Plants, and Magma, as lessor, receives royalties from the revenues earned by
such power plants.
Lessors and royalty holders are generally paid a monthly or annual rental
payment during the term of the lease or mineral interest unless and until the
acreage goes into production, in which case the rental typically stops and the
(generally higher) royalty payments begin. Leases of federal property are
transacted with the Department of Interior, Bureau of Land Management, pursuant
to standard geothermal leases under the Geothermal Steam Act and the regulations
promulgated thereunder (the "Regulations"), and are for a primary term of 10
years, extendible for an additional five years if drilling is commenced within
the primary term and is diligently pursued for two successive five-year periods
upon certain conditions set forth in the Regulations. A secondary term of up to
40 years is available so long as geothermal resources from the property are
being produced or used in commercial quantities. Leases of state lands may vary
in form. Leases of private lands vary considerably, since their terms and
provisions are the product of negotiations with the landowners.
-12-
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
In addition to the proceedings described below, some of the projects are
currently parties to various minor items of litigation in the normal course of
business, none of which, if determined adversely, would have a material adverse
effect on those projects financial position, results of operations or cash
flows.
Edison/California Power Exchange - Past Due Amounts
- ---------------------------------------------------
Due to reduced liquidity, Edison had failed to pay approximately $119 million
owed under the power purchase agreements with the Imperial Valley Projects
(excluding the Salton Sea V and CE Turbo Projects) for power delivered in the
fourth quarter 2000 and the first quarter 2001. Due to Edison's failure to pay
contractual obligations, the Imperial Valley Projects (excluding the Salton Sea
V and CE Turbo Projects) had established an allowance for doubtful accounts of
approximately $21 million as of December 31, 2001.
As a result of uncertainties related to Edison, the letter of credit that
supports the debt service reserve fund at Salton Sea Funding Corporation has not
been extended beyond its current July 2004 expiration date, and as such, cash
distributions are not available to CE Generation until the Salton Sea Funding
Corporation debt service reserve fund of approximately $67.6 million has been
funded or the letter of credit has been extended beyond its July 2004 expiration
date or replaced. The fund has a cash balance of $46.3 million as of December
31, 2002
Pursuant to a settlement agreement the final payment by Edison for past due
balances was received March 1, 2002. Following the receipt of Edison's payment
of past due balances, the Imperial Valley Projects released the remaining
allowance for doubtful accounts.
Edison has disputed a portion of the settlement agreement and has failed to pay
approximately $3.9 million of capacity bonus payments for the months from
October 2001 through May 2002. On December 10, 2001 the Imperial Valley Projects
(excluding the Salton Sea I, Salton Sea V and CE Turbo Projects) filed a lawsuit
against Edison in California's Imperial County Superior Court seeking a court
order requiring Edison to make the required capacity bonus payments under the
Power Purchase Agreements. Due to Edison's failure to pay these contractual
obligations, the Imperial Valley Projects have established an allowance for
doubtful accounts of approximately $2.7 million. The Project entities are
vigorously pursuing collection of the capacity bonus payments.
On March 25, 2002, Salton Sea II's 10 MW turbine went out of service due to an
uncontrollable force event. Such uncontrollable force event ended, and Salton
Sea II returned to service, on December 17, 2002. Edison has failed to recognize
the uncontrollable force event and as such has not paid amounts otherwise due
and owing and has improperly derated Salton Sea II from 15 MW to 12.5 MW, under
the Salton Sea II Power Purchase Agreement. On January 29, 2003, Salton Sea
Power Generation, L.P. served a complaint on Edison for such unpaid amounts and
to rescind such deration.
In January 2001, the California Power Exchange ("PX") declared bankruptcy. As a
result, the Salton Sea V and CE Turbo Projects have not received payment for
power sold under the Transaction Agreements during December 2000 and January
2001 of approximately $3.8 million. The Imperial Valley Projects have
established an allowance for doubtful accounts for the full amount of this
receivable. The Project entities are vigorously pursuing collection.
Stone & Webster
- ---------------
The Salton Sea V and CE Turbo Projects were constructed by Stone & Webster, Inc.
(formerly Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation), a wholly-owned subsidiary of
the Shaw Group ("Stone & Webster"), pursuant to date certain, fixed-price,
turnkey engineering, procure, construct and manage contracts (collectively, the
"Salton Sea V and CE Turbo Projects EPC Contracts"). On March 7, 2002, Salton
Sea Power, Vulcan/BN Geothermal Power Company, Del Ranch, L.P., and CE Turbo,
the owners of the Salton Sea V and CE Turbo Projects, filed a Demand for
Arbitration against Stone & Webster for breach of contract and breach of
warranty arising from deficiencies in Stone & Webster's design, engineering,
construction and procurement of equipment for the Salton Sea V and CE Turbo
Projects pursuant to the Salton Sea V and CE Turbo Projects EPC Contracts. On
November 25, 2002 Vulcan/BN Geothermal Power Company, Del Ranch, L.P., and CE
Turbo, LLC entered into a Settlement Agreement with Stone & Webster. The
Settlement Agreement resulted in a $3.5 million payment from Stone & Webster.
The breach of contract and breach of warranty claims made by the owners of the
Salton Sea V Project are still pending and the hearing is scheduled to commence
in April 2003.
-13-
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.
Not Applicable.
-14-
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER'S MATTERS.
Not applicable.
-15-
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
(Amounts in thousands)
The selected data presented below are derived from CE Generation's audited
consolidated financial statements. The consolidated financial statements reflect
the consolidated financial statements of Magma and subsidiaries (excluding
wholly-owned subsidiaries retained by MidAmerican), FSRI Holdings, Inc. and
subsidiaries and Yuma Cogeneration Associates, each a wholly-owned subsidiary of
CE Generation. The consolidated financial statements present CE Generation's
financial position, results of operations and cash flows as if CE Generation
were a separate legal entity for all periods presented.
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
2002 2001 2000 (1) 1999 (2) 1998
----------- ----------- ----------- ------------ -----------
Statement of Operations Data:
Operating revenue ........................ $ 500,729 $ 552,335 $ 499,926 $ 295,787 $ 395,560
Total revenue ............................ 510,082 565,838 510,796 340,683 436,175
Income before minority interest,
extraordinary item and cumulative
effect of change in accounting principle 79,071 89,812 89,148 61,970 93,778
Minority interest ........................ (20,757) (15,618) (15,613) -- --
Extraordinary item, net of tax (3) ....... -- -- -- (17,478) --
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle, net of tax (4) ... -- (15,386) -- -- --
Net income ............................... 58,314 58,808 73,535 44,492 93,778
BALANCE SHEET DATA:
Total assets ............................. $ 1,865,036 $ 1,932,119 $ 1,984,445 $ 1,725,411 $ 1,782,385
Project loans, including current portion . 163,142 199,006 230,221 76,261 90,529
Salton Sea notes and bonds, including
current portion ........................ 491,678 520,250 543,908 568,980 626,816
Senior Secured Bonds, including current
portion ................................ 356,400 377,000 389,600 400,000 --
Total liabilities ........................ 1,322,762 1,404,910 1,477,066 1,333,131 1,245,438
Members' equity .......................... 489,895 467,377 438,915 392,280 536,947
(1) Reflects full consolidation of the Saranac Project, which was
previously accounted for as an equity investment. The 2000 results
also reflect the addition of the Salton Sea Unit V and CE Turbo
Projects, which commenced operations in 2000.
(2) The decrease in revenue and net income in 1999 was primarily due to
the expiration of the fixed price periods for the Elmore, Del Ranch
and Salton Sea III Projects.
(3) The extraordinary item recognized in the year ended December 31, 1999
reflects the early redemption of substantially all of the outstanding
9 7/8% Limited Recourse Senior Secured Notes Due 2003.
(4) The cumulative effect of change in accounting principle reflects a
January 1, 2001 write off of prepaid and accrued balances associated
with the change in policy for accounting for major maintenance,
overhauls and well workovers.
-16-
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS.
The following is management's discussion and analysis of significant factors,
which have affected CE Generation's financial condition and results of
operations during the periods included in the accompanying statements of
operations. The Company's actual results in the future could differ
significantly from the historical results.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires
management to make judgments, assumptions and estimates that affect the amounts
reported in the Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying notes. Note 2
to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
describes the significant accounting policies and methods used in the
preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements. Estimates are used for,
but not limited to, the accounting for the allowance for doubtful accounts,
impairment of long-lived assets and contingent liabilities. Actual results could
differ from these estimates. The following critical accounting policies are
impacted significantly by judgments, assumptions and estimates used by
management in the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
- -------------------------------
The allowance for doubtful accounts is based on the Company's assessment of the
collectibility of specific customer accounts and the aging of the accounts
receivable. If there is a deterioration of a major customer's credit worthiness
or actual defaults are higher than the Company's historical experience,
estimates of the recoverability of amounts due could be adversely affected.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
- -------------------------------
The Company's long-lived assets consist primarily of property, plant and
equipment and intangible assets with useful lives that range from 3 to 40 years,
and acquired goodwill. The Company believes the useful lives of its long-lived
assets are reasonable. The Company also evaluates long-lived assets for
impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying
amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Triggering events include a
significant change in the extent or manner in which long-lived assets are being
used or in its physical condition, in legal factors, or in the business climate
that could affect the value of the long-lived assets, including changes in
regulation. The interpretation of such events requires judgment from management
as to whether such an event has occurred and is required. If an event occurs
that could effect the carrying value of the asset and management does not
identify it as a triggering event, future results of operations could be
significantly affected.
Upon the occurrence of a triggering event, the carrying amount of a long-lived
asset is reviewed to assess whether the recoverable amount has declined below
its carrying amount. The recoverable amount is the estimated net future cash
flows that the Company expects to recover from the future use of the asset,
undiscounted and without interest, plus the asset's residual value on disposal.
Where the recoverable amount of the long-lived asset is less than the carrying
value, an impairment loss would be recognized to write down the asset to its
fair value, which is based on discounted estimated cash flows from the future
use of the asset.
The estimated cash flows arising from future use of the asset that are used in
the impairment analysis requires judgment regarding what the Company would
expect to recover from future use of the asset. Any changes in the estimates of
cash flows arising from future use of the asset or the residual value of the
asset on disposal based on changes in the market conditions, changes in the use
of the assets, management's plans, the determination of the useful life of the
assets and technology change in the industry could significantly change the
calculation of the fair value or recoverable amount of the asset and the
resulting impairment loss, which could significantly affect the results of
operations.
On January 1, 2002, CE Generation adopted Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards ("SFAS") No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" ("SFAS 142"),
which establishes the accounting for acquired goodwill and other intangible
assets, and provides that goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets will
not be amortized, but will be tested for impairment on an annual basis. CE
Generation's related amortization consists solely of goodwill amortization,
which has no income tax effect. In accordance with SFAS 142, CE Generation
completed its initial goodwill impairment test, as of January 1, 2002, and its
annual goodwill impairment test, as of October 31, 2002, during the fourth
quarter of 2002, primarily using a discounted cash flow methodology. No
impairment was indicated as a result of the impairment tests.
-17-
Contingent Liabilities
- ----------------------
The Company is subject to the possibility of various loss contingencies,
including tax, legal and environmental, arising in the ordinary course of
business. The Company considers the likelihood of the loss or the incurrence of
a liability as well as its ability to reasonably estimate the amount of loss in
determining loss contingencies. An estimated loss contingency is accrued when it
is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be
reasonably estimated. The Company regularly evaluates current information
available to it to determine whether such accruals should be adjusted.
Income Taxes
- ------------
CE Generation and its subsidiaries file a consolidated federal tax return.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized based on the difference
between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using
estimated tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected
to reverse.
FACTORS AFFECTING RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The capacity factor for a particular project is determined by dividing total
quantity of electricity sold by the product of the project's capacity and the
total hours in the year. The capacity factors for Salton Sea I Project, Salton
Sea II Project, Salton Sea III Project, Salton Sea IV Project, and Salton Sea V
Project plants are based on capacity amounts of 10, 20, 50, 40, and 49 net
megawatts, respectively. The capacity factors for Vulcan Project, Del Ranch
Project, Elmore Project, Leathers Project, and CE Turbo Project plants are based
on capacity amounts of 34, 38, 38, 38 and 10 net megawatts, respectively. The
capacity factors for the Saranac Project, Power Resources Project and Yuma
Project plants are based on capacity amounts of 240, 200 and 50 net megawatts,
respectively. Each plant possesses an operating margin, which allows for
production in excess of the amount listed above. Utilization of this operating
margin is based upon a variety of factors and can be expected to vary throughout
the year under normal operating conditions. The amount of revenues received by
these projects is affected by the extent to which they are able to operate and
generate electricity. Accordingly, the capacity and capacity factor figures
provide information on operating performance that has affected the revenues
received by these projects.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 2002 AND 2001
Operating revenue decreased $51.6 million or 9.3% to $500.7 million for the year
ended December 31, 2002 from $552.3 million for the same period in 2001. The
decrease reflects high SRAC prices at the Imperial Valley and Yuma Projects in
the first quarter of 2001.
The following operating data represents the aggregate capacity and electricity
production of the Imperial Valley Projects:
2002 2001
--------- ----------
Overall capacity factor ............ 89.60% 89.70%
MWh produced ....................... 2,561,800 2,565,600
Capacity (net MW)(weighted average). 326.4 326.4
The following operating data represents the aggregate capacity and electricity
production of the Gas Projects:
2002 2001
--------- ----------
Overall capacity factor ............ 92.35% 88.60%
MWh produced ....................... 3,963,818 3,804,800
Capacity (net MW)(weighted average). 490 490
The overall capacity factor of the Gas Projects reflects the effect of
contractual curtailments. The capacity factors adjusted for these contractual
curtailments are 99.4% and 98.0% for 2002 and 2001, respectively. The changes in
the overall capacity factor in 2002 and 2001 were due primarily to major
maintenance scheduling.
-18-
Interest and other income decreased $4.2 million or 30.7% to $9.4 million for
the year ended December 31, 2002 from $13.5 million for the same period in 2001
due to the interest earned in 2001 on past due Edison amounts.
Fuel expenses increased $0.7 million or 0.6% to $121.7 million for the year
ended December 31, 2002 from $121.0 million for the same period in 2001. The
increase was primarily due to increased production.
Plant operating expenses, which include operating, maintenance, resource and
other plant operating expenses, decreased $0.3 million or 0.2% to $134.1 million
for the year ended December 31, 2002 from $134.4 million for the same period in
2001. The decrease was primarily due to timing of major maintenance activities.
General and administrative expenses decreased $3.3 million or 32.4% to $6.9
million for the year ended December 31, 2002 from $10.2 million for the same
period in 2001. These costs include administrative services provided to CE
Generation, including executive, financial, legal, tax and other corporate
functions. The decrease in 2002 was primarily due to high legal costs in 2001
related to the California energy crisis.
Depreciation and amortization decreased $3.0 million or 3.5% to $82.1 million
for the year ended December 31, 2002 from $85.0 million for the same period in
2001. This decrease was due to the discontinuation of goodwill amortization,
resulting from the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
("SFAS") No. 142, "Goodwill and Intangible Assets," which totaled $9.6 million
in 2001. This decrease was partially offset by increased depreciation from
capital additions.
Interest expense, decreased $5.2 million or 6.3% to $76.7 million for the year
ended December 31, 2002 from $81.9 million for the same period in 2001. The
decrease reflects lower debt balances.
The asset impairment in 2001 reflects the write off of the book value of a steam
turbine. In 2001, the Company made the decision to dispose of the turbine. The
Company determined that the turbine, which had been held in storage for possible
use in new development projects, no longer had any significant value.
The provision for income taxes decreased $19.0 million or 66.5% to $9.6 million
for the year ended December 31, 2002 from $28.5 million for the same period in
2001. The effective tax rate was 10.8% and 24.1% in 2002 and 2001, respectively.
During 2002, the Company made considerable progress on several significant
income tax examination matters for prior tax years, including percentage of
depletion, which resulted in a decrease in income tax expense of $15.1 million
in 2002.
The cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle in 2001 reflects the
Company's change in its accounting policy for major maintenance, overhaul and
well workover costs. These costs, which had historically been accounted for
using the deferral and accrual methods, are now expensed as incurred. The
cumulative effect of the change in accounting policy represents a January 1,
2001 write off of prepaid and accrued major maintenance and well workover
balances of approximately $15.4 million, net of tax of $9.9 million. If CE
Generation had adopted the policy as of January 1, 2000, income before
cumulative effect of change in accounting principle would have been $10.9
million lower in 2000 on a proforma basis.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 2001 AND 2000
Sales of electricity and steam increased to $552.3 million in the year ended
December 31, 2001 from $499.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2000, a 10%
increase. The increase reflects a full year of production from the Salton Sea V
and CE Turbo Projects and increased energy rates at the other Imperial Valley
Projects and the Yuma Project
The following operating data represents the aggregate capacity and electricity
production of the Imperial Valley Projects:
2001 2000
--------- ---------
Overall capacity factor ............ 89.70% 87.70%
MWh produced ....................... 2,565,600 2,296,800
Capacity (net MW)(weighted average). 326.4 298.3
The increase in capacity in 2001 relates to the addition of the Salton Sea V and
CE Turbo Projects in the third quarter of 2000. The changes in overall capacity
factor in 2001 and 2000 were primarily due to overhaul and outage scheduling and
-19-
the construction and tie in of the upgraded brine facilities and the start-up of
the Salton Sea V and CE Turbo Projects in 2000.
The following operating data represents the aggregate capacity and electricity
production of the Gas Projects:
2001 2000
--------- ---------
Overall capacity factor ............ 88.60% 86.50%
MWh produced ....................... 3,804,800 3,722,401
Capacity (net MW)(weighted average). 490 490
The overall capacity factor of the Gas Projects reflects the effect of
contractual curtailments. The capacity factors adjusted for these contractual
curtailments are 98.0% and 92.9% for 2001 and 2000, respectively. The changes in
the overall capacity factor in 2001 and 2000 were due primarily to major
maintenance scheduling.
Interest and other income increased to $13.5 million in 2001 from $10.9 million
in 2000 due to interest income earned on past due balances from Edison.
Fuel expenses increased to $121.0 million in 2001 from $115.0 million in 2000.
The increase represents the annual rate increases in the long-term gas
contracts, increased gas prices at the Yuma Project and overall increased
production at the Gas Projects
Plant operating expenses, which include operating, maintenance, resource and
other plant operating expenses, increased to $134.4 million in the year ended
December 31, 2001 from $114.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2000. The
increase was primarily due to the full year of operations of the Salton Sea V
and CE Turbo Projects resulting in increased waste removal, chemical costs and
repair costs at the Imperial Valley Projects.
General and administrative expenses increased to $10.2 million in the year ended
December 31, 2001 from $5.5 million in the year ended December 31, 2000. These
costs include administrative services provided to CE Generation, including
executive, financial, legal, tax and other corporate functions. The increase in
2001 is primarily due to increased legal expenses associated with the Edison
litigation.
Depreciation and amortization increased to $85.0 million in 2001 from $80.7
million in 2000. This increase reflects a full year of depreciation associated
with the Salton Sea V and CE Turbo Projects and upgrades to steam gathering
systems, which were operational in the third quarter of 2000.
Interest expense, less amounts capitalized, decreased to $81.9 million in 2001
from $84.2 million in 2000. The decrease reflects lower debt balances.
The asset impairment in 2001 reflects the write off of the book value of a steam
turbine. In 2001, the Company made the decision to dispose of the turbine. The
Company determined that the turbine, which had been held in storage for possible
use in new development projects, no longer had any significant value.
The provision for income taxes increased to $28.5 million in 2001 from $21.4
million in 2000. The effective tax rate was 24.1% and 19.4% in 2001 and 2000,
respectively. The changes from year to year in the effective rate are due
primarily to the generation and utilization of energy tax credits and depletion
deductions.
The cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle in 2001 reflects the
Company's change in its accounting policy for major maintenance, overhaul and
well workover costs. These costs, which have historically been accounted for
using the deferral and accrual methods, are now expensed as incurred. The
cumulative effect of the change in accounting policy represents a January 1,
2001 write off of prepaid and accrued major maintenance and well workover
balances of approximately $15.4 million, net of tax of $9.9 million. If CE
Generation had adopted the policy as of January 1, 2000, income before
cumulative effect of change in accounting principle would have been $10.9
million lower in 2000 on a proforma basis.
-20-
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Pursuant to the Administrative Services Agreement, MEHC provides certain
administrative and management services to CE Generation, and MEHC's executive,
financial, legal, tax and other corporate staff departments perform certain
services for CE Generation. Expenses incurred by MEHC and allocated to CE
Generation were estimated based on the individual services and expense items
provided. There were no allocated expenses in 2002 however allocated expenses
totaled $3.4 million in 2001 and $2.5 million in 2000, and are included in
general and administrative expense. On August 1, 2002, the Administrative
Services Agreement between MEHC and CE Generation was amended to provide for a
fixed monthly fee in lieu of certain expenses, which were being allocated. The
fixed fee, which was retroactive to January 1, 2002 and ends December 2004, is
$258,333 per month and is included in general and administrative expense.
The Company participates in multi-employer pension plans sponsored by MEHC. The
Company's contributions to the various plans was approximately $1.8 million,
$1.6 million and $1.2 million in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
On May 26, 2000, CE Generation issued a $6.5 million 10% note due June 15, 2005,
in favor of MidAmerican and a $6.5 million 10% note due June 15, 2005 in favor
of EPME Company. The notes were repaid on October 16, 2000.
On September 29, 2000, Salton Sea Power and CE Turbo entered into an agreement
to sell all available power from the Salton Sea V Project and CE Turbo Project
to EPME. Under the terms of the agreement, EPME purchased and sold available
power on behalf of Salton Sea Power and CE Turbo, into the California ISO
markets. The purchase price for the available power was equivalent to the value
actually received by EPME for the sale of such power, including renewable
premiums.
On January 17, 2001, Salton Sea Power and CE Turbo entered into a Transaction
Agreement to sell available power from the Salton Sea V Project and CE Turbo
Project to EPME. Under the terms of the agreement, at the option of Salton Sea
Power and CE Turbo, EPME purchased all available power from the Salton Sea V
Project and CE Turbo Project based on day ahead price quotes received from EPME.
On March 27, 2001 and May 1, 2001, the Imperial Valley Projects entered into
Transaction Agreements to sell available power to EPME based on percentages of
the Dow Jones SP-15 Index. On June 22, 2001, the Imperial Valley Projects
(excluding the Salton Sea V Project and CE Turbo Project) ceased selling
available power to EPME and resumed power sales to Edison under the Power
Purchase Agreements ("PPAs"). Effective September 16, 2002 Salton Sea Power and
CE Turbo entered into Transaction Agreements to sell available power to EPME at
increased percentages of the Dow Jones SP-15 Index.
Pursuant to these agreements, sales to EPME from the Company totaled $8.9
million, $102.8 million and $19.5 million in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
As of December 31, 2002 and 2001, accounts receivable from EPME were $1.4
million and $11.8 million, respectively.
Pursuant to a Transaction Agreement dated January 29, 2003, Salton Sea Power and
CE Turbo and began selling available power to TransAlta on February 12, 2003
based on percentages of the Dow Jones SP-15 Index. Such agreement will expire on
October 15, 2003.
Pursuant to the November 1, 1998 Amended and Restated Power Sales Agreements,
Salton Sea Power and CE Turbo are to provide Minerals with its full electrical
energy requirements at the market rates available to them, less wheeling costs.
Effective August 1, 2002, Salton Sea Power and CE Turbo amended their respective
power sale agreements with Minerals to provide for a fixed price of $31.00 per
megawatt hour for all hours of August 1, 2002 through December 31, 2002.
Pursuant to these agreements, sales to Minerals from Salton Sea Power totaled
$0.4 million and $0.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001,
respectively, and there were no sales to Minerals from CE Turbo for the years
ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. There were no material accounts
receivable balances at December 31, 2002 and 2001.
-21-
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Each of CE Generation's direct or indirect subsidiaries is organized as a legal
entity separate and apart from CE Generation and its other subsidiaries and
MEHC. Pursuant to separate project financing agreements, the assets of each
subsidiary (excluding Yuma) are pledged or encumbered to support or otherwise
provide the security for their own project or subsidiary debt. It should not be
assumed that any asset of any subsidiary of CE Generation, will be available to
satisfy the obligations of CE Generation or any of its other subsidiaries;
provided, however, that unrestricted cash or other assets which are available
for distribution may, subject to applicable law and the terms of financing
arrangements for such parties, be advanced, loaned, paid as dividends or
otherwise distributed or contributed to CE Generation or affiliates thereof.
"Subsidiary" means all of CE Generation's direct or indirect subsidiaries (1)
owning direct or indirect interests in the Imperial Valley Projects (including
the Salton Sea Projects and the Partnership Projects other than Magma Power
Company and Salton Sea Power Company), or (2) owning direct interests in the
subsidiaries that own interests in the foregoing projects, the Saranac Project
and the Power Resources Project.
CE Generation generated cash flows from operations of $197.5 million for the
year ended December 31, 2002 compared with $127.5 million for the same period in
2001. The increase was primarily due to the receipt of past due balances from
Edison partially offset by changes in working capital.
Cash flow used in investing activities was $28.9 million for the year ended
December 31, 2002 compared with cash used of $37.6 million for the same period
in 2001. Capital expenditures are the primary components of investing
activities.
Cash flow used in financing activities was $159.8 million for the year ended
December 31, 2002 compared with $91.2 million for the same period in 2001. The
changes in cash flows from financing activities reflect the scheduled debt
repayments, a $33.6 million distribution in 2002 and a $43.2 million deposit
into the debt service reserve account in 2002.
Edison, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Edison International, is a public utility
primarily engaged in the business of supplying electric energy to retail
customers in Central and Southern California, excluding Los Angeles. Due to
reduced liquidity, Edison failed to pay approximately $119 million owed under
the power purchase agreements with the Imperial Valley Projects, (excluding the
Salton Sea V and CE Turbo Projects) for power delivered in the fourth quarter
2000 and the first quarter 2001. Due to Edison's failure to pay contractual
obligations, the Imperial Valley Projects (excluding the Salton Sea V and CE
Turbo Projects) had established an allowance for doubtful accounts of
approximately $21 million as of December 31, 2001.
The final payment of the past due amounts by Edison was received March 1, 2002.
Following the receipt of Edison's final payment of past due balances, the
Imperial Valley Projects released the remaining allowance for doubtful accounts.
As a result of uncertainties related to Edison, the letter of credit that
supports the debt service reserve fund at Salton Sea Funding Corporation has not
been extended beyond its current July 2004 expiration date, and as such, cash
distributions are not available to CE Generation until the Salton Sea Funding
Corporation debt service reserve fund of approximately $67.6 million has been
funded or the letter of credit has been extended beyond its July 2004 expiration
date or replaced. The fund has a cash balance of $46.3 million as of December
31, 2002
In January 2001, the PX declared bankruptcy. As a result, the Salton Sea V and
CE Turbo Projects have not received payment for power sold under the Transaction
Agreements during December 2000 and January 2001 of approximately $3.8 million.
The Imperial Valley Projects have established an allowance for doubtful accounts
for the full amount of this receivable.
Edison has failed to pay approximately $3.9 million of capacity bonus payments
for the months from October 2001 through May 2002. On December 10, 2001 the
Imperial Valley Projects (excluding the Salton Sea I, Salton Sea V, and CE Turbo
Projects) filed a lawsuit against Edison in California's Imperial County
Superior Court seeking a court order requiring Edison to make the required
capacity bonus payments under the Power Purchase Agreements. Due to Edison's
failure to pay these contractual obligations, the Imperial Valley Projects have
established an allowance for doubtful accounts of approximately $2.7 million.
The Project entities are vigorously pursuing collection of the capacity bonus
payments.
On March 25, 2002, Salton Sea II's 10 MW turbine went out of service due to an
uncontrollable force event. Such uncontrollable force event ended, and Salton
Sea II returned to service, on December 17, 2002. Edison has failed to recognize
the uncontrollable force event and as such has not paid amounts otherwise due
and owing and has
-22-
improperly derated Salton Sea II from 15 MW to 12.5 MW, under the Salton Sea II
Power Purchase Agreement. On January 29, 2003, Salton Sea Power Generation, L.P.
served a complaint on Edison for such unpaid amounts and to rescind such
deration.
ENVIRONMENTAL LIABILITIES
The Company is subject to numerous legislative and regulatory environmental
protection requirements involving air and water pollution, waste management,
hazardous chemical use, noise abatement, and land use aesthetics.
State and federal environmental laws and regulations currently have, and future
modifications may have, the effect of (i) increasing the lead time for the
construction of new facilities, (ii) significantly increasing the total cost of
new facilities, (iii) requiring modification of the Company's existing
facilities, (iv) increasing the risk of delay on construction projects, (v)
increasing the Company's cost of waste disposal and (vi) reducing the
reliability of service provided by the Company and the amount of energy
available from the Company's facilities. Any of such items could have a
substantial impact on amounts required to be expended by the Company in the
future. Expenditures for ongoing compliance with environmental regulations that
relate to current operations are expensed or capitalized as appropriate.
Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by past operations, and
which do not contribute to current or future revenue generation, are expensed.
Liabilities are recorded when environmental assessments indicate that
remediation efforts are probable and the costs can be reasonably estimated.
Estimates of the liability are based upon currently available facts, existing
technology and presently enacted laws and regulations taking into consideration
the likely effects of inflation and other social and economic factors, and
include estimates of associated legal costs. These amounts also consider prior
experience in remediating sites, other companies' clean-up experience and data
released by the Environmental Protection Agency or other organizations. These
estimated liabilities are subject to revision in future periods based on actual
costs or new circumstances, and are included in the accompanying balance sheets
at their undiscounted amounts. As of December 31, 2002 and 2001, the
environmental liabilities recorded on the balance sheet were $5.3 million and
$4.2 million, respectively.
INFLATION
Inflation has not had a significant impact on CE Generation's cost structure.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND COMMERCIAL COMMITMENTS
The Company has contractual obligations and commercial commitments that may
affect its financial condition. Contractual obligations to make future payments
primarily arise from long-term debt and fuel purchase agreements. In addition,
possible future payments arise from lines of credit and standby letters of
credit.
-23-
The following tables identify material obligations and commitments as of
December 31, 2002 (in thousands):
PAYMENTS DUE BY PERIOD
--------------------------------------------------------------
Less Than 2-3 4-5 After 5
Total 1 Year Years Years Years
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Contractual cash obligations:
Long-term debt ..................... $1,011,220 $ 86,656 $ 138,656 $ 156,572 $ 629,336
Other long-term obligations (1) .... 498,402 88,227 134,632 145,420 130,123
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Total contractual cash obligations $1,509,622 $ 174,883 $ 273,288 $ 301,992 $ 759,459
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
COMMITMENT EXPIRATION PER PERIOD
--------------------------------------------------------------
Less Than 2-3 4-5 After 5
Total 1 Year Years Years Years
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Other Commercial Commitments:
Lines of credit (2) ........... $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ -- $ -- $ --
Standby letters of credit (3) . 105,800 38,200 67,600 -- --
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Total commercial commitments $ 120,800 $ 53,200 $ 67,600 $ -- $ --
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
(1) Other long-term obligation primarily represent natural gas purchase
agreements for the Gas Facilities as of December 31, 2002.
(2) The lines of credit represent the unused borrowing capacity available
to the Company, as of December 31, 2002.
(3) The standby letters of credit represent the letters of credit expiring
in February 2004 for CE Generation, the letters of credit expiring in
July 2004 for Salton Sea Funding Corporation and the letters of credit
expiring in December 2003 for the Saranac Partnership.
NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In August 2001, the FASB, issued SFAS No. 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement
Obligations" ("SFAS 143"). This statement provides accounting and disclosure
requirements for retirement obligations associated with long-lived assets and is
effective January 1, 2003. This statement requires that the present value of
retirement costs for which the Company has a legal obligation be recorded as
liabilities with an equivalent amount added to the asset cost and depreciated
over an appropriate period. The liability is then accreted over time by applying
an interest method of allocation to the liability. Cumulative accretion and
accumulated depreciation will be recognized for the time period from the date
the liability would have been recognized had the provisions of this statement
been in effect, to the date of adoption of this statement. The cumulative effect
of initially applying this statement will be recognized as a cumulative effect
of a change in accounting principle that is expected to be $2.5 million, net of
tax of $1.6 million, in January 2003.
The Company's review identified legal retirement obligations for landfill and
plant abandonment costs. The Company will record liabilities pursuant to SFAS
143 in January 2003. The Company used an expected cash flow approach to measure
the obligations. The following proforma liabilities reflect amounts as if this
statement had been applied during all periods (in thousands):
2002 2001
------ ------
Plant abandonment .... $3,798 $3,673
Landfill abandonment . 3,663 3,542
The plant abandonment had no previously recorded liability. The landfill
abandonment had a previously recorded liability of $1.5 million.
In November 2002, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 45, "Guarantor's
Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect
Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others" ("FIN 45"). FIN 45 requires that upon
issuance of a guarantee, a guarantor must recognize a liability for the fair
value of an obligation assumed under a guarantee. FIN 45 also requires
additional disclosures by a guarantor in its interim and annual financial
statements about the obligations associated with guarantees issued. The
recognition provisions of FIN 45 are effective for any guarantees issued or
modified after December 31, 2002. The disclosure requirements are effective for
financial
-24-
statements of interim or annual periods ending after December 15, 2002. The
Company does not expect the adoption of FIN 45 to have a material effect on its
financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
The following discussion of the Company's exposure to various market risks
contains "forward-looking statements" that involve risks and uncertainties.
These projected results have been prepared utilizing certain assumptions
considered reasonable in the circumstances and in light of information currently
available to the Company. Actual results could differ materially from those
projected in the forward-looking information.
INTEREST RATE RISK
At December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively, the Company had fixed-rate
long-term debt of $848.1 million and $897.3 million with a fair value of $778.2
million and $800.1 million. These instruments are fixed-rate and therefore do
not expose the Company to the risk of earnings loss due to changes in market
interest rates. However, the fair value of these instruments would decrease by
approximately $49.2 million and $52.7 million if interest rates were to increase
by 10% from their levels at December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. In
general, a decrease in fair value would impact earnings and cash flows only if
the Company were to reacquire all or a portion of these instruments prior to
their maturity.
At December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively, the Company had floating-rate
obligations of $163.1 million and $199.0 million, which exposes the Company to
the risk of increased interest expense in the event of increases in short-term
interest rates. The Company has entered into interest rate swap agreements for
the purpose of completely offsetting these interest rate fluctuations. The
interest rate differential is reflected as an adjustment to interest expense
over the life of the instruments. At December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively,
these interest rate swaps had an aggregate notional amount of $163.1 million and
$199.0 million, which the Company could terminate at a cost of approximately
$21.0 million and $16.3 million. A decrease of 10% in the December 31, 2002 and
2001 level of interest rates would increase the cost of terminating the swaps by
approximately $4.3 million and $4.6 million, respectively. These termination
costs would impact the Company's earnings and cash flows only if all or a
portion of the swap instruments were terminated prior to their expiration.
-25-
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.
Independent Auditors' Report......................................... 27
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2002 and 2001......... 28
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Other Comprehensive Income
for the Three Years Ended December 31, 2002..................... 29
Consolidated Statements of Members' Equity for the Three Years Ended
December 31, 2002............................................... 30
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Years Ended
December 31, 2002............................................... 31
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements........................... 32
-26-
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
Board of Directors and Members'
CE Generation, LLC
Omaha, Nebraska
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of CE Generation,
LLC and subsidiaries (collectively, the "Company") as of December 31, 2002 and
2001, and the related consolidated statements of operations and other
comprehensive income, members' equity, and cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 2002. Our audits also included the
consolidated financial statement schedule listed in Item 15. These financial
statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of CE Generation, LLC and subsidiaries
as of December 31, 2002 and 2001 and the results of their operations and their
cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2002 in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America. Also in our opinion, such consolidated financial statement schedule,
when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken
as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth
therein.
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, in 2002 the
Company changed its accounting policy for goodwill and other intangible assets
and in 2001 the Company changed its accounting policy for major maintenance,
overhaul and well workover costs.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Omaha, Nebraska
January 24, 2003 (January 29, 2003 as to Note 12)
-27-
CE GENERATION, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2002 AND 2001
(Amounts in thousands)
2002 2001
----------- -----------
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents ............................ $ 43,706 $ 34,870
Restricted cash ...................................... 60,238 17,025
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for
doubtful accounts of $6,496 and $24,754 ............ 63,554 128,725
Prepaid expenses and other assets .................... 9,943 7,178
Inventories .......................................... 25,049 23,705
Due from affiliates ................................ -- 132
----------- -----------
Total current assets ............................... 202,490 211,635
----------- -----------
Restricted cash ........................................ 14,299 14,009
Properties, plants, contracts and equipment, net ....... 1,234,408 1,287,668
Excess of cost over fair value of net assets acquired .. 265,897 265,897
Note receivable from related party ..................... 137,789 139,896
Deferred financing charges and other assets ............ 10,153 13,014
----------- -----------
TOTAL ASSETS ........................................... $ 1,865,036 $ 1,932,119
=========== ===========
LIABILITIES AND MEMBERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities ....... $ 63,103 $ 70,772
Due to affiliates .................................... 406 --
Current portion of long-term debt .................... 86,656 85,036
----------- -----------
Total current liabilities .......................... 150,165 155,808
----------- -----------
Project loans .......................................... 122,573 163,142
Salton Sea notes and bonds ............................. 463,591 491,678
Senior secured bonds ................................... 338,400 356,400
Deferred income taxes .................................. 248,033 237,882
----------- -----------
Total liabilities .................................... 1,322,762 1,404,910
----------- -----------
Minority interest ...................................... 52,379 59,832
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 4 and 10)
Members' equity ........................................ 499,748 475,073
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net .............. (9,853) (7,696)
----------- -----------
Total members' equity ................................ 489,895 467,377
----------- -----------
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND MEMBERS' EQUITY .................. $ 1,865,036 $ 1,932,119
=========== ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
-28-
CE GENERATION, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
FOR THE THREE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002
(Amounts in thousands)
2002 2001 2000
--------- --------- ---------
Revenue:
Operating revenue ............................. $ 500,729 $ 552,335 $ 499,926
Interest and other income ..................... 9,353 13,503 10,870
--------- --------- ---------
Total revenue ............................... 510,082 565,838 510,796
--------- --------- ---------
COSTS AND EXPENSES:
Fuel .......................................... 121,736 121,022 115,008
Plant operations .............................. 134,065 134,357 114,867
General and administrative .................... 6,899 10,205 5,461
Depreciation and amortization ................. 82,055 85,035 80,710
Interest expense .............................. 76,697 81,869 88,491
Less interest capitalized ..................... -- -- (4,291)
Asset impairment (Note 4) ..................... -- 15,000 --
--------- --------- ---------
Total costs and expenses .................... 421,452 447,488 400,246
--------- --------- ---------
INCOME BEFORE PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES ........ 88,630 118,350 110,550
Provision for income taxes .................... 9,559 28,538 21,402
--------- --------- ---------
INCOME BEFORE MINORITY INTEREST ................. 79,071 89,812 89,148
Minority interest ............................. 20,757 15,618 15,613
--------- --------- ---------
INCOME BEFORE CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF CHANGE
IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLE ....................... 58,314 74,194 73,535
Cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle, net of tax (Note 2) .............. -- (15,386) --
--------- --------- ---------
NET INCOME ...................................... $ 58,314 $ 58,808 $ 73,535
========= ========= =========
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME:
Cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle, net of tax (Note 2) .............. -- (5,954) --
Unrealized loss on cash flow hedges, net of tax
of $1,438 and $1,161 ........................ (2,157) (1,742) --
--------- --------- ---------
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME ............................ $ 56,157 $ 51,112 $ 73,535
========= ========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
-29-
CE GENERATION, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF MEMBERS' EQUITY
FOR THE THREE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002
(Amounts in thousands)
ACCUMULATED
OTHER
MEMBERS' COMPREHENSIVE
EQUITY INCOME TOTAL
--------- ------------- ---------
BALANCE, JANUARY 1, 2000 ........................ $ 392,280 $ -- $ 392,280
Distributions ................................. (26,900) -- (26,900)
Net income .................................... 73,535 -- 73,535
--------- --------- ---------
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2000 ...................... 438,915 -- 438,915
Distributions ................................. (22,650) -- (22,650)
Net income .................................... 58,808 -- 58,808
Other comprehensive income:
Initial implementation of SFAS 133 designated
cash flow hedges .......................... -- (5,954) (5,954)
Change in fair value of cash flow hedges .... -- (1,742) (1,742)
--------- --------- ---------
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2001 ...................... 475,073 (7,696) 467,377
Distributions ................................. (33,639) -- (33,639)
Net income .................................... 58,314 -- 58,314
Other comprehensive income:
Change in fair value of cash flow hedges ...... -- (2,157) (2,157)
--------- --------- ---------
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2002 ...................... $ 499,748 $ (9,853) $ 489,895
========= ========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
-30-
CE GENERATION, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE THREE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002
(Amounts in thousands)
2002 2001 2000
--------- --------- ---------
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income ....................................... $ 58,314 $ 58,808 $ 73,535
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash flows
from operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization .................. 82,055 85,035 80,710
Asset impairment ............................... -- 15,000 --
Provision for deferred income taxes ............ 10,490 3,377 3,348
Distributions to minority interest in excess of
related income ............................... (5,222) (5,163) (8,043)
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle, net of tax ............. -- 15,386 --
Changes in other items:
Accounts receivable, net ....................... 65,171 (39,149) (34,096)
Inventories .................................... (1,344) 3,719 (2,371)
Due from affiliates ............................ 538 (2,260) 4,138
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities . (12,397) (4,722) 19,568
Other assets ................................... (58) (2,545) (6,174)
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash flows from operating activities ..... 197,547 127,486 130,615
--------- --------- ---------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Capital expenditures ............................. (28,640) (33,219) (59,280)
Consolidation of former equity investment's cash . -- -- 2,559
Decrease (increase) in restricted cash ........... (290) (4,391) 23,696
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash flows from investing activities ....... (28,930) (37,610) (33,025)
--------- --------- ---------
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Repayment of Salton Sea notes and bonds .......... (28,572) (23,658) (25,072)
Repayment of Senior Secured bonds ................ (20,600) (12,600) (10,400)
Repayment of note payable to related party ....... -- -- (13,000)
Proceeds from related party note ................. 2,107 632 13,000
Repayment of project loans ....................... (35,864) (31,201) (27,137)
Distributions .................................... (33,639) (22,100) (26,900)
Increase in restricted cash ...................... (43,213) (2,231) (1,049)
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash flows from financing activities ....... (159,781) (91,158) (90,558)
--------- --------- ---------
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS 8,836 (1,282) 7,032
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year ..... 34,870 36,152 29,120
--------- --------- ---------
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF YEAR ........... $ 43,706 $ 34,870 $ 36,152
========= ========= =========
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE:
Interest paid, net of interest capitalized ....... $ 74,067 $ 79,211 $ 83,106
========= ========= =========
Income taxes paid ................................ $ 1,199 $ 21,928 $ 16,411
========= ========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
-31-
CE GENERATION, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. ORGANIZATION AND OPERATIONS
MidAmerican Energy Holdings Company ("MidAmerican" or "MEHC") completed a
strategic restructuring in conjunction with its acquisition of MHC Inc.
(formerly MidAmerican Energy Holdings Company) in which MEHC's common stock
interests in Magma Power Company, FSRI Holdings, Inc. ("FSRI") and California
Energy Development Corporation, and their subsidiaries (which own the geothermal
and natural gas-fired combined cycle cogeneration facilities described below),
were contributed by MEHC to the newly created CE Generation, LLC ("CE
Generation" or the "Company"). This restructuring was completed in February
1999.
On March 3, 1999, MEHC closed the sale of 50% of its ownership interests in CE
Generation to El Paso CE Generation Holding Company, which was merged into El
Paso Merchant Energy North America Company on December 31, 2000 ("EPME"). EPME
is an indirect subsidiary of El Paso Corporation.
BASIS OF PRESENTATION
- ---------------------
These consolidated financial statements of CE Generation reflect the
consolidated financial statements of Magma Power Company and subsidiaries and
FSRI and subsidiaries and Yuma Cogeneration Associates, each a wholly-owned
subsidiary. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in
consolidation.
Based on the nature of the Company's products, the production process, types of
customers and the method used to distribute products; the regulatory environment
and the economic characteristics of its operations, the Company has determined
that it operates in one reportable segment.
-32-
GENERAL
- -------
CE Generation is engaged in the independent power business. The following table
sets out information concerning CE Generation's projects:
POWER
FACILITY NET PURCHASE
CAPACITY NET MW AGREEMENT
OPERATING PROJECT (MW) OWNED LOCATION EXPIRATION
- ------------------------------ ------------ -------- -------- ----------
GEOTHERMAL FACILITIES:
Salton Sea Projects
Salton Sea I................ 10 10 California 2017
Salton Sea II............... 20 20 California 2020
Salton Sea III.............. 50 50 California 2019
Salton Sea IV............... 40 40 California 2026
Salton Sea V................ 49 49 California Year-to-year
--- ---
Total Salton Sea Projects.. 169 169
--- ---
Partnership Projects
Vulcan....................... 34 34 California 2016
Elmore....................... 38 38 California 2018
Leathers..................... 38 38 California 2019
Del Ranch.................... 38 38 California 2019
CE Turbo..................... 10 10 California Year-to-year
--- ---
Total Partnership Projects.. 158 158
--- ---
Total geothermal facilities.. 327 327
--- ---
GAS FACILITIES:
Saranac...................... 240 180 New York 2009
Power Resources.............. 200 200 Texas 2003
Yuma......................... 50 50 Arizona 2024
--- ---
Total gas facilities.......... 490 430
--- ---
TOTAL OPERATING PROJECTS...... 817 757
=== ===
Salton Sea I, II, III, IV and V are referred as the Salton Sea Projects. Vulcan,
Del Ranch, Elmore, Leathers and CE Turbo are referred to as the Partnership
Projects. The Salton Sea Projects and the Partnership Projects are collectively
referred to as the Imperial Valley Projects. Saranac, Power Resources and Yuma
are referred to as the Gas Projects.
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Cash Equivalents
- ----------------
CE Generation considers all investment instruments purchased with an original
maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Restricted cash is not
considered a cash equivalent.
Restricted Cash
- ---------------
The current restricted cash balance is composed of debt service funds that are
legally restricted as to their use and require the maintenance of specific
minimum balances equal to the next debt service payment. The non-current
restricted cash balance is composed of restricted accounts for capital
expenditures and major maintenance expenditures.
-33-
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
- -------------------------------
The allowance for doubtful accounts is based on the Company's assessment of the
collectibility of specific customer accounts and the aging of the accounts
receivable. If there is deterioration of a major customer's credit worthiness or
actual defaults are higher than the Company's historical experience, estimates
of the recoverability of amounts due it could be adversely affected.
Inventories
- -----------
Inventories consist of spare parts and supplies and are valued at the lower of
cost or market. Cost for large replacement parts is determined using the
specific identification method. For the remaining supplies, cost is determined
using the weighted average cost method.
Well Costs
- ----------
The cost of drilling and equipping production wells and other direct costs, are
capitalized and amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful
lives when production commences. The estimated useful lives of production wells
are twenty years.
Major Maintenance, Overhaul and Well Rework Costs
- -------------------------------------------------
CE Generation has changed its accounting policy for major maintenance, overhaul
and well rework costs. These costs, which had historically been accounted for
using deferral and accrual methods, are now expensed as incurred. The new policy
went into effect January 1, 2001 and the Company recorded a cumulative effect of
this change of approximately $15.4 million, net of tax of approximately $9.9
million. If CE Generation had adopted the policy as of January 1, 2000, income
before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle would have been $10.9
million lower in 2000 on a proforma basis.
Properties, Plants, Contracts, Equipment and Depreciation
- ---------------------------------------------------------
The cost of major additions and betterments are capitalized, while replacements,
maintenance, and repairs that do not improve or extend the lives of the
respective assets are expensed.
Depreciation of the operating power plant costs, net of salvage value if
applicable, is computed on the straight-line method over the estimated useful
life of 30 years. Depreciation of furniture, fixtures and equipment is computed
on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related
assets, which range from 3 to 30 years.
Acquired power sales agreements are amortized separately on a straight-line
basis over the remaining contract periods which have ranged from 7 to 30 years
at the date of acquisition.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
- -------------------------------
The Company's long-lived assets consist primarily of property, plant and
equipment and intangible assets with useful lives that range from 3 to 40 years.
The Company believes the useful lives of its long-lived assets are reasonable.
The Company also evaluates long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be
recoverable. Triggering events include a significant change in the extent or
manner in which long-lived assets are being used or in its physical condition,
in legal factors, or in the business climate that could affect the value of the
long-lived assets, including changes in regulation. The interpretation of such
events requires judgment from management as to whether such an event has
occurred and is required. If an event occurs that could effect the carrying
value of the asset and management does not identify it as a triggering event,
future results of operations could be significantly affected.
Upon the occurrence of a triggering event, the carrying amount of a long-lived
asset is reviewed to assess whether the recoverable amount has declined below
its carrying amount. The recoverable amount is the estimated net future cash
flows that the Company expects to recover from the future use of the asset,
undiscounted and without interest, plus the asset's residual value on disposal.
Where the recoverable amount of the long-lived asset is less than the carrying
value, an impairment loss would be recognized to write down the asset to its
fair value, which is based on discounted estimated cash flows from the future
use of the asset.
-34-
The estimated cash flows arising from future use of the asset that are used in
the impairment analysis requires judgment regarding what the Company would
expect to recover from future use of the asset. Any changes in the estimates of
cash flows arising from future use of the asset or the residual value of the
asset on disposal based on changes in the market conditions, changes in the use
of the assets, management's plans, the determination of the useful life of the
assets and technology change in the industry could significantly change the
calculation of the fair value or recoverable amount of the asset and the
resulting impairment loss, which could significantly affect the results of
operations.
Excess of Cost over Fair Value of Net Assets Acquired
- -----------------------------------------------------
On January 1, 2002, CE Generation adopted Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards ("SFAS") No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" ("SFAS 142"),
which establishes the accounting for acquired goodwill and other intangible
assets, and provides that goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets will
not be amortized, but will be tested for impairment on an annual basis. CE
Generation's related amortization consists solely of goodwill amortization,
which has no income tax effect. In accordance with SFAS 142, CE Generation
completed its initial goodwill impairment test, as of January 1, 2002, and its
annual goodwill impairment test, as of October 31, 2002, during the fourth
quarter of 2002, primarily using a discounted cash flow methodology. No
impairment was indicated as a result of the impairment tests.
Following is a reconciliation of net income as originally reported for the years
ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, to adjusted net income (in thousands):
2002 2001 2000
------- ------- -------
Reported net income .......... $58,314 $58,808 $73,535
Goodwill amortization ...... -- 9,589 9,593
------- ------- -------
Adjusted net income .......... $58,314 $68,397 $83,128
======= ======= =======
-35-
Intangible Assets
- -----------------
The following table summarizes the acquired intangible assets as of December 31
(in thousands):
2002
-------------------------------
Gross Carrying Accumulated
Amount Amortization
-------------- --------------
Amortized Intangible Assets:
Power Purchase Contracts ..... $ 338,716 $ 203,685
Patented Technology .......... 46,290 15,385
-------------- --------------
Total ................... $ 385,006 $ 219,070
============== ==============
2001
-------------------------------
Gross Carrying Accumulated
Amount Amortization
-------------- --------------
Amortized Intangible Assets:
Power Purchase Contracts ..... $ 338,716 $ 185,466
Patented Technology .......... 46,290 13,456
-------------- --------------
Total ................... $ 385,006 $ 198,922
============== ==============
Amortization expense on acquired intangible assets was $18.3 million for the
year ended December 31, 2002. CE Generation expects amortization expense on
acquired intangible assets to be $18.1 million for 2003 and $14.9 million for
each of the four succeeding fiscal years.
Capitalization of Interest and Deferred Financing Costs
- -------------------------------------------------------
Prior to the commencement of operations, interest is capitalized on the costs of
the plants and geothermal resource development to the extent incurred.
Capitalized interest and other deferred charges are amortized on a straight-line
basis over the lives of the related assets.
Deferred financing costs are amortized over the term of the related financing
using the effective interest method.
Revenue Recognition
- -------------------
Revenues are recorded based upon electricity and steam delivered to the end of
the month. See Note 4 for contractual terms of power sales agreements. Royalties
earned from providing geothermal resources to power plants operated by other
geothermal power producers are recorded when delivered.
Income Taxes
- ------------
CE Generation and its subsidiaries file a consolidated federal tax return.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized based on the difference
between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using
estimated tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected
to reverse.
-36-
Financial Instruments
- ---------------------
In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards 133/138, "Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities", which was delayed by SFAS 137 and amended
by SFAS 138. SFAS 133/138 requires an entity to recognize all of its derivatives
as either assets or liabilities in its statement of financial position and
measure those instruments at fair value. CE Generation adopted SFAS 133/138
effective January 1, 2001. As a result of the adoption of SFAS 133/138, CE
Generation recorded the fair value of the interest rate swap agreements at
January 1, 2001, which was approximately $6.0 million, net of tax of
approximately $4.0 million. These interest rate swap agreements are considered
cash flow hedges and therefore the offset is recorded in accumulated other
comprehensive income. The adoption did not have an impact on results or
operations or cash flows.
CE Generation utilizes swap agreements to manage market risks and reduce its
exposure resulting from fluctuation in interest rates. For interest rate swap
agreements, the net cash amounts paid or received on the agreements are accrued
and recognized as an adjustment to interest expense. CE Generation's practice is
not to hold or issue financial instruments for trading purposes. These
instruments are either exchange traded or with counterparties of high credit
quality; therefore, the risk of nonperformance by the counterparties is
considered to be negligible.
Fair values of financial instruments are estimated based on quoted market prices
for debt issues actively traded or on market prices of similar instruments
and/or valuation techniques using market assumptions.
Reclassifications
- -----------------
Certain reclassifications were made to the 2001 and 2000 financial statements to
conform to the 2002 presentation.
Use of Estimates
- ----------------
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In August 2001, the FASB, issued SFAS No. 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement
Obligations" ("SFAS 143"). This statement provides accounting and disclosure
requirements for retirement obligations associated with long-lived assets and is
effective January 1, 2003. This statement requires that the present value of
retirement costs for which the Company has a legal obligation be recorded as
liabilities with an equivalent amount added to the asset cost and depreciated
over an appropriate period. The liability is then accreted over time by applying
an interest method of allocation to the liability. Cumulative accretion and
accumulated depreciation will be recognized for the time period from the date
the liability would have been recognized had the provisions of this statement
been in effect, to the date of adoption of this statement. The cumulative effect
of initially applying this statement will be recognized as a cumulative effect
of a change in accounting principle that is expected to be $2.5 million, net of
tax of $1.6 million, in January 2003.
The Company's review identified legal retirement obligations for landfill and
plant abandonment costs. The Company will record liabilities pursuant to SFAS
No. 143 in January 2003. The Company used an expected cash flow approach to
measure the obligations. The following proforma liabilities reflect amounts as
if this statement had been applied during all periods (in thousands):
2002 2001
------ ------
Plant abandonment .... $3,798 $3,673
Landfill abandonment . 3,663 3,542
The plant abandonment had no previously recorded liability. The landfill
abandonment had a previously recorded liability of $1.5 million.
In November 2002, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 45, "Guarantor's
Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect
Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others" ("FIN 45"). FIN 45 requires that upon
issuance of a guarantee, a guarantor must recognize a liability for the fair
value of an obligation assumed
-37-
under a guarantee. FIN 45 also requires additional disclosures by a guarantor in
its interim and annual financial statements about the obligations associated
with guarantees issued. The recognition provisions of FIN 45 are effective for
any guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002. The disclosure
requirements are effective for financial statements of interim or annual periods
ending after December 15, 2002. The Company does not expect the adoption of FIN
45 to have a material effect on its financial position, results of operations,
or cash flows.
3. EQUITY INVESTMENTS
CE Generation indirectly held noncontrolling general and limited partnership
interests in Saranac Power Partners, L.P. (the "Saranac Partnership") which was
formed to build, own and operate natural gas fired combined cycle cogeneration
facilities. Under the Saranac Partnership agreement, the economic interests of
the partners flip after certain limited partners achieve fixed rates of return.
In January 2000, TPC Saranac Partner One Inc. and TPC Saranac Partner Two Inc.
("Tomen"), limited partners, achieved an after tax return of 8.35%. This
achievement resulted in lower cash flows to Tomen and higher cash flows to CE
Generation. Following this achievement, CE Generation's economic interest in the
partnership increased to approximately 64%. Effective January 2000, the
investment in the Saranac Partnership is no longer reported as an equity
investment but is fully consolidated into CE Generation's financial results.
4. PROPERTIES, PLANTS, CONTRACTS AND EQUIPMENT, NET
Properties, plants, contracts and equipment comprise the following at December
31 (in thousands):
2002 2001
----------- -----------
Cost:
Power plants .............................. $ 1,288,281 $ 1,269,211
Wells and resource development ............ 180,151 173,363
Power sales agreements .................... 338,716 338,716
Licenses and equipment .................... 50,501 49,374
----------- -----------
1,857,649 1,830,664
Accumulated depreciation and amortization ... (623,241) (542,996)
----------- -----------
$ 1,234,408 $ 1,287,668
=========== ===========
The asset impairment in 2001 reflects the write off of the book value of a steam
turbine which had been held in storage for use in new development projects and
no longer had any significant value.
Significant Customers and Contracts
- -----------------------------------
CE Generation's sales of electricity from the Imperial Valley Projects,
comprised approximately 37%, 43%, and 41%, respectively, of 2002, 2001, and 2000
electricity and steam revenues. Of these sales, approximately 95%, 59% and 86%
were to Southern California Edison ("Edison") in 2002, 2001 and 2000,
respectively. Sales of electricity from the Saranac Project comprised
approximately 37%, 31% and 33%, respectively, of the 2002 2001 and 2000
electricity and steam revenues. Of these sales approximately 98% were to New
York State Electric and Gas ("NYSEG"). Sales of electricity from the Power
Resources Project comprised approximately 19%, 16% and 17%, respectively, of the
2002, 2001 and 2000 electricity and steam revenues. Of these sales approximately
97% were to TXU Generation Company LP ("TXU"). Accounts receivable,
approximately $25.1 million of which are from Edison, approximately $16 million
from NYSEG and approximately $8 million from TXU are primarily uncollateralized
receivables from long-term power purchase contracts described below. If the
customers were unable to perform, CE Generation could incur an accounting loss
equal to $63.6 million and $128.7 million at December 31, 2002, and 2001,
respectively.
Imperial Valley Projects
- ------------------------
Each of the Imperial Valley Projects, excluding the CE Turbo and Salton Sea V
Projects, sells electricity to Edison pursuant to a separate Standard Offer No.
4 Agreement ("SO4 Agreement") or a negotiated power purchase agreement. Each
power purchase agreement is independent of the others, and the performance
requirements specified within one such agreement apply only to the Project,
which is subject to the agreement. The power purchase agreements provide for
energy payments, capacity payments and capacity bonus payments. Edison makes
fixed annual capacity payments and capacity bonus payments to the projects to
the extent that capacity factors exceed
-38-
certain benchmarks. The price for capacity is fixed for the life of the SO4
Agreements and are significantly higher in the months of June through September.
Energy payments for the SO4 Agreement were at increasing fixed rates for the
first ten years after firm operation and thereafter at a rate based on the cost
that Edison avoids by purchasing energy from the project instead of obtaining
the energy from other sources ("Avoided Cost of Energy"). In June and November
2001, the Imperial Valley Projects, excluding the CE Turbo and Salton Sea V
Projects, entered into Agreements Addressing Renewable Energy Pricing and
Payment Issues with Edison ("Settlement Agreements"). The Settlement Agreements
provide for amended energy payments under the SO4 Agreements. The amendments
provide for fixed energy payments per kWh in lieu of Edison's Avoided Cost of
Energy. The fixed energy payment was 3.25 cents per kWh from December 1, 2001
through April 30, 2002 and 5.37 cents per kWh commencing May 1, 2002 for a
five-year period. Following the five-year period, the energy payments revert
back to Edison's Avoided Cost of Energy.
For the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, Edison's average Avoided
Cost of Energy was 3.5 cents, 7.4 cents and 5.8 cents per kWh, respectively.
Estimates of Edison's future Avoided Cost of Energy vary substantially from year
to year.
The Salton Sea I Project contracts to sell electricity to Edison pursuant to a
30-year negotiated power purchase agreement that commenced on July 1, 1987, as
amended (the "Salton Sea I PPA"). The contract capacity and contract nameplate
are each 10 MW. The capacity payment is based on the firm capacity price, which
adjusts quarterly based on a basket of energy indices for the term of the Salton
Sea I PPA is currently $154.45 per kW-year. The capacity payment is
approximately $1.1 million per annum. The energy payment is calculated using a
Base Price (defined as the initial value of the energy payment (4.7 cents per
kWh for the second quarter of 1992)), which is subject to quarterly adjustments
based on a basket of indices. The time period weighted average energy payment
for Salton Sea I was 5.8, 5.9 and 5.7 cents per kWh during 2002, 2001 and 2000,
respectively. As the Salton Sea I PPA is not an SO4 Agreement, the energy
payments do not revert to Edison's Avoided Cost of Energy.
The Salton Sea II Project contracts to sell electricity to Edison pursuant to a
30-year modified SO4 Agreement that commenced on April 5, 1990. The contract
capacity and contract nameplate are 15 MW (16.5 MW during on-peak periods) and
20 MW, respectively. The price for contract capacity and contract capacity bonus
payments are fixed for the life of the modified SO4 Agreement. The annual
capacity and bonus payments are approximately $3.3 million. The energy payments
for the first ten-year period, which period expired on April 4, 2000, were
levelized at a time period weighted average of 10.6 cents per kWh. Thereafter,
the monthly energy payment was based on Edison's Avoided Cost of Energy. Edison
is entitled to receive, at no cost, 5% of all energy delivered in excess of 80%
of contract capacity through September 30, 2004.
The Salton Sea III Project contracts to sell electricity to Edison pursuant to a
30-year modified SO4 Agreement that commenced on February 13, 1989. The contract
capacity and the contract nameplate are 47.5 MW and 49.8 MW, respectively. The
price for contract capacity payments and capacity bonus payments is fixed at
$175 per kW-year. The annual capacity and bonus payments are approximately $9.7
million. The energy payments for the first ten-year period, which period expired
on February 12, 1999, were levelized at a time period weighted average of 9.8
cents per kWh. Thereafter, the energy payment was based on Edison's Avoided Cost
of Energy.
The Salton Sea IV Project contracts to sell electricity to Edison pursuant to a
modified SO4 Agreement which provides for contract capacity payments on 34 MW of
capacity at two different rates based on the respective contract capacities
deemed attributable to the original Salton Sea I PPA option (20 MW) and to the
original Salton Sea IV SO4 Agreement ("Fish Lake PPA") (14 MW). The capacity
payment price for the 20 MW portion adjusts quarterly based upon specified
indices and the capacity payment price for the 14 MW portion is a fixed
levelized rate. The capacity and bonus payments in 2002, 2001 and 2000 were
approximately $5.5 million, $5.7 million and $5.4 million, respectively. The
energy payment (for deliveries up to a rate of 39.6 MW) is at a base price,
adjusted quarterly based on specified indices, for 55.6% of the total energy
delivered by Salton Sea IV and is based on an energy payment schedule for 44.4%
of the total energy delivered by Salton Sea IV. The contract has a 30-year term
but Edison is not required to purchase the 20 MW of capacity and energy
originally attributable to the Salton Sea I PPA option after September 30, 2017,
the original termination date of the Salton Sea I PPA.
The Salton Sea V Project, which commenced operations in the third quarter of
2000, will sell approximately 22 MW of its output to Minerals pursuant to a 33
year power sales agreement. The agreement provides for energy payments based on
the market rates available to the Salton Sea V Project, adjusted for wheeling
costs. The Salton Sea V Project sells its remaining output through other market
transactions.
-39-
The Vulcan Project contracts to sell electricity to Edison under a 30-year SO4
Agreement that commenced on February 10, 1986. The Vulcan Project has a contract
capacity and contract nameplate of 29.5 MW and 34 MW, respectively. The annual
capacity and bonus payments are approximately $5.5 million.
The Elmore Project contracts to sell electricity to Edison under a 30-year SO4
Agreement that commenced on January 1, 1989. The contract capacity and contract
nameplate are 34 MW and 38 MW, respectively. The annual capacity and bonus
payments are approximately $7.9 million.
The Leathers Project contracts to sell electricity to Edison pursuant to a
30-year SO4 Agreement that commenced on January 1, 1990. The contract capacity
and contract nameplate are 34 MW and 38 MW, respectively. The annual capacity
and bonus payments are approximately $7.5 million. The energy payment is based
on Edison's Avoided Cost of Energy.
The Del Ranch Project contracts to sell electricity to Edison under a 30-year
SO4 Agreement that commenced on January 2, 1989. The contract capacity and
contract nameplate are 34 MW and 38 MW, respectively. The annual capacity and
bonus payments are approximately $7.9 million.
The CE Turbo Project, which commenced commercial operation in the third quarter
of 2000, sells its output through market transactions. The CE Turbo Project may
sell its output to CalEnergy Minerals LLC ("Minerals"), a zinc facility owned by
a subsidiary of MidAmerican, pursuant to a 33 year power purchase agreement. The
agreement provides for energy payments based on the market rates available to
the CE Turbo Project, adjusted for wheeling costs.
The Imperial Valley Projects other than the Salton Sea I Project receive
transmission service from the Imperial Irrigation District to deliver
electricity to Edison near Mirage, California. These projects pay a rate based
on the Imperial Irrigation District's cost of service, which was $1.70 per month
per kilowatt of service provided for 2002 and recalculated annually. The
transmission service and interconnection agreements expire in 2015 for the
Partnership Projects, 2019 for the Salton Sea III Project, 2020 for the Salton
Sea II Project and 2026 for the Salton Sea IV Project. The Salton Sea V and the
CE Turbo Projects have entered into 30-year agreements with similar terms with
the Imperial Irrigation District. The Salton Sea I Project delivers energy to
Edison at the project site and has no transmission service agreement with the
Imperial Irrigation District.
Royalties
- ---------
Royalty expense for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, which is
included in plant operations in the consolidated statements of operations,
comprise the following (in thousands):
2002 2001 2000
------- ------- -------
Salton Sea I & II .... $ 772 $ 668 $ 836
Salton Sea III ....... 1,891 1,391 1,523
Salton Sea IV ........ 3,965 2,309 2,618
Salton Sea V ......... 212 796 1,014
Vulcan ............... 689 918 709
Elmore ............... 906 1,277 1,026
Leathers ............. 1,178 1,645 1,367
Del Ranch ............ 1,169 1,445 1,323
CE Turbo ............. 41 123 187
------- ------- -------
Total ................ $10,823 $10,572 $10,603
======= ======= =======
The Imperial Valley Projects obtain their geothermal resource rights from Magma
Power Company and Magma Land Company I, wholly-owned subsidiaries of the
Company.
The Partnership Projects pay royalties based on both energy revenues and total
electricity revenues. Del Ranch and Leathers pay royalties of approximately 5%
of energy revenues and 1% of total electricity revenue. Elmore pays royalties of
approximately 5% of energy revenues. Vulcan pays royalties of approximately
4.167% of energy revenues.
-40-
The Salton Sea Project's weighted average royalty expense in 2002, 2001 and 2000
was approximately 9.8%, 6.0%, and 6.1%, respectively. The royalties are paid to
numerous recipients based on varying percentages of electrical or steam
production multiplied by published indices.
Gas Projects
- ------------
The Saranac Project sells electricity to NYSEG pursuant to a 15 year negotiated
power purchase agreement (the "Saranac PPA"), which provides for capacity and
energy payments. Capacity payments, which in 2002 total 2.68 cents per kWh are
received for electricity produced during "peak hours" as defined in the Saranac
PPA and escalate at approximately 4.1% annually for the remaining term of the
contract. Energy payments, which averaged 7.86 cents per kWh in 2002, escalate
at approximately 4.4% annually for the remaining term of the Saranac PPA. The
Saranac PPA expires in June of 2009. The Saranac Project sells steam to
Georgia-Pacific and Tenneco Packaging under long-term steam sales agreements. CE
Generation believes that these agreements will enable the Saranac Project to
sell the minimum annual quantity of steam necessary for the Saranac Project to
maintain its qualifying facility status under the Public Utility Regulatory
Policies Act of 1978, ("PURPA") for the term of the Saranac PPA.
The Saranac Project purchases natural gas from Coral Energy under a 15-year gas
supply agreement that expires in 2009. The price was $3.24 per million MMBtu, at
December 2002 and escalates at the rate of 4% per year. Coral Energy delivers
the gas to the pipeline owned by the Saranac Project's subsidiary, North Country
Gas Pipeline, which transports the gas to the Saranac Project.
The Power Resources Project sells electricity to TXU pursuant to a 15 year
negotiated power purchase agreement ("the Power Resources PPA"), which provides
for capacity and energy payments. Capacity payments and energy payments, which
in 2002 are $3.6 million per month and 3.5 cents per kWh, respectively, escalate
at 3.5% annually for the remaining term of the Power Resources PPA. The Power
Resources PPA expires in September 2003. The Power Resources Project sells steam
to Fina Oil and Chemical under a 15-year agreement. Power Resources has agreed
to supply Fina with up to 150,000 pounds per hour of steam. As long as the Power
Resources Project meets its supply obligations, Fina is required to purchase at
least the minimum amount of steam per year required to allow the Power Resources
Project to maintain its qualifying facility status under PURPA.
Fina Oil and Chemical supplies 3,600 MMBtu of refinery fuel gas to the Power
Resources project under an agreement that expires in 2003. The delivery point is
at the Power Resources Project. The price was $3.02 per MMBtu in 2002 and
escalates at 2% per year. Dominion Oklahoma Texas Exploration and Production,
Inc., ("Dominion"), formerly Louis Dreyfus Natural Gas Corporation, also
supplies natural gas for the Power Resources Project under a gas supply
agreement that expires in 2003. The price for the first 31,200 MMBtu per day
under the agreement was $2.48 per MMBtu in 2002 and escalates incrementally to
$2.57 per MMBtu in 2003. The price for the second 3,000 MMBtu per day under the
agreement is set at the West Texas spot price plus $.05 per MMBtu. Additional
gas may be purchased under the agreement at prices that are negotiated with
Dominion. Dominion delivers the gas to Westar Transmission System, which
transports the gas for Power Resources to the project at a rate of $.06 to $.12
per MMBtu depending upon the point of entry into the Westar Transmission system.
Depending upon several market variables, the Power Resources Project could
continue operation after the expiration of the Power Resources PPA. On December
30, 2002, Power Resources obtained an exempt wholesale generator order from the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
The Saranac and Power Resources Projects each delivers energy to its respective
power purchaser at or near the site of its project and does not utilize
transmission service provided by any other party. The facilities to interconnect
each of these projects to the system of the power purchaser were constructed
under the terms of its power purchase agreement.
The Yuma Project sells electricity to San Diego Gas & Electric Company ("SDG&E")
under an existing 30-year power purchase contract commencing in May 1994. The
energy is sold at SDG&E's Avoided Cost of Energy and the capacity is sold to
SDG&E at a fixed price for the life of the power purchase contract. The annual
capacity payments are approximately $8.4 million. The power is wheeled to SDG&E
over transmission lines constructed and owned by Arizona Public Service Company
("APS"). The Yuma Project sells steam to Queen Carpet, Inc. pursuant to an
agreement that expires on May 1, 2024. Queen Carpet is required to take a
minimum of 126,900 MMBtus of steam per year, which the Yuma Project needs to
maintain its qualifying facility status under PURPA.
The Yuma Project purchases natural gas from Southwest Gas Corporation
("Southwest Gas"). The Yuma Project is entitled to direct Southwest Gas to
purchase gas from any of several gas supply basins and transport it to the
project. The
-41-
Yuma Project pays a price based on the applicable index for the relevant basin.
The agreement may be terminated by either party, in which case Southwest Gas
would be required to provide gas transportation service under its transportation
tariff to the Yuma Project.
5. PROJECT LOANS
Each of CE Generation's direct or indirect subsidiaries is organized as a legal
entity separate and apart from CE Generation and its other subsidiaries and
MEHC. Pursuant to separate project financing agreements, the assets of each
subsidiary (excluding Yuma) are pledged or encumbered to support or otherwise
provide the security for their own project or subsidiary debt. It should not be
assumed that any asset of any subsidiary of CE Generation, will be available to
satisfy the obligations of CE Generation or any of its other subsidiaries;
provided, however, that unrestricted cash or other assets which are available
for distribution may, subject to applicable law and the terms of financing
arrangements for such parties, be advanced, loaned, paid as dividends or
otherwise distributed or contributed to CE Generation or affiliates thereof.
"Subsidiary" means all of CE Generation's direct or indirect subsidiaries (1)
owning direct or indirect interests in the Imperial Valley Projects (including
the Salton Sea Projects and the Partnership Projects other than Magma Power
Company and Salton Sea Power Company), or (2) owning direct interests in the
subsidiaries that own interests in the foregoing projects, the Saranac Project
and the Power Resources Project.
The Power Resources Project has project financing debt with a consortium of
banks with interest and principal due quarterly over a 15-year period, beginning
March 31, 1989. The original principal carried a variable interest rate based on
the London Interbank Offer Rate ("LIBOR") with a .85% interest margin through
the 5th anniversary of the loan, a 1.00% interest margin from the 5th
anniversary through the 12th anniversary of the loan and a 1.25% interest margin
from the 12th anniversary through the end of the loan. The loan is
collateralized by an assignment of all revenues received by the Power Resources
Project, a lien on substantially all of its real and personal property and a
pledge of its capital stock.
The outstanding $21.7 million of project financing debt, as of December 31,
2002, is scheduled to be repaid during 2003.
Under the Power Resources Project's term loan agreement, certain covenants and
conditions must be met before cash distributions can be made, the most
significant of which is the maintenance of a historical quarterly debt service
coverage ratio of at least 1.20:1.00 in order to permit all available cash to be
distributed. The Power Resource Project was in compliance with these
requirements at December 31, 2002.
Effective June 5, 1989, the Power Resource Project entered into an interest rate
swap agreement with the lender as a means of hedging floating interest rate
exposure related to its 15-year term loan. The swap agreement was for initial
notional amounts of $55.0 million and $110.0 million, declining in
correspondence with the principal balances, and effectively fixed the interest
rates at 9.385% and 9.625%, respectively, excluding the interest margin. The
swap agreements are settled in cash based on the difference between a fixed and
floating (index based) price for the underlying debt. The notional values of
these financial instruments were $21.7 million and $42.1 million at December 31,
2002 and 2001, respectively. The Power Resource Project would be exposed to
credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the lender under the interest rate
swap agreement. However, the Power Resource Project does not anticipate
nonperformance by the lender. The fair value of the swap as of December 31, 2002
and 2001 is $1.1 million and $3.1 million, respectively, and is included in
accrued liabilities in the balance sheet.
The interest rate can be increased by payments under a Compensation Agreement
included in the Power Resources' Project term loan. The Compensation Agreement,
which entitles two of the term lenders to receive quarterly payments equivalent
to a percentage of the Power Resources Project's discretionary cash flow ("DCF")
as separately defined in the agreement, became effective for a 13-year period
ending December 31, 2003. Under certain conditions relating to the amount of the
Power Resources Project cash flow and the restrictions on cash distributions,
the Power Resource Project has the option to replace the payment obligation in a
quarter with a payment to be calculated in a future quarter and added to the end
of the initial term of the agreement. The Compensation Agreement entitles the
lenders to payments totaling 10% of DCF for the first ten years, 7.5% of DCF for
the next three years and 10% of DCF for each quarter added to the initial term
of the agreement. The Power Resource Project recorded additional interest
expense of $1.3 million, $1.1 million and $1.2 million for the years ended
December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively, related to amounts owed under
the Compensation Agreement.
In October 1994, the Saranac Partnership signed a 14-year note payable agreement
with a lender for an initial principal amount of $204.6 million. Under the terms
of the note payable agreement, interest rate alternatives include an option to
use a Eurodollar rate or the lender's base rate. Each option includes an
interest margin in addition to the applicable rate
-42-
selected. The selected interest rate plus interest margin at December 31, 2002,
2001, and 2000 was 2.92313%, 3.71625% and 7.5238%, respectively.
Maturities of the note payable at December 31, 2002 are as follows (in
thousands):
AMOUNT
--------
2003 .......... $ 18,827
2004 .......... 22,100
2005 .......... 26,193
2006 .......... 31,104
2007 .......... 34,378
Thereafter .... 8,798
--------
Total ......... $141,400
========
The note agreements are collateralized by all of the Saranac Partnership's
assets. The Saranac Partnership is restricted by the terms of the note payable
agreement from making distributions or withdrawing any capital accounts without
the consent of the lender. Under the terms of the note payable agreement,
distributions may be made to the partners in accordance with the terms of the
Saranac Partnership Agreement. The note payable agreement also requires the
Saranac Partnership to maintain certain covenants. The Saranac Partnership was
in compliance with these requirements at December 31, 2002.
Effective October 7, 1994, the Saranac Partnership entered into an interest rate
swap agreement with the lender as a means of hedging floating interest rate
exposure related to its 14-year note payable. The swap agreement was an initial
notional amount of $204.6 million and effectively fixes the interest rate at
8.185%, which increased to 8.31% in October 2001 and will increase to 8.56% in
October 2005. The Saranac Partnership is exposed to credit loss in the event of
nonperformance by the lender under the interest rate swap agreement. However,
the Saranac Partnership does not anticipate nonperformance by the lender. The
fair value of the swap as of December 31, 2002 and 2001 was $19.9 million and
$13.2 million, respectively, and is included in accrued liabilities in the
balance sheet.
The Saranac Partnership has issued an irrevocable letter of credit to its gas
supplier in the amount of $14.8 million. The Saranac Partnership has
approximately $5.7 million available in additional unissued letters of credit.
Annual fees related to these letters of credit are calculated as 1.75% of the
issued balance and 0.5% of the unissued balance.
6. SALTON SEA NOTES AND BONDS
The Salton Sea Funding Corporation (the "Funding Corporation"), a wholly-owned
indirect subsidiary of CE Generation, has issued debt securities as follows (in
thousands):
SENIOR DECEMBER 31,
SECURED -------------------
ISSUED DATE SERIES FINAL MATURITY DATE RATE 2002 2001
- ---------------- ------- ------------------- ----- -------- ---------
July 21, 1995 B Bonds May 30, 2005 7.37% $ 56,661 $ 79,360
July 21, 1995 C Bonds May 30, 2010 7.84% 109,250 109,250
June 20, 1996 E Bonds May 30, 2011 8.30% 46,322 47,922
October 13, 1998 F Bonds November 30, 2018 7.48% 279,445 283,718
----- -------- --------
$491,678 $520,250
======== ========
Principal and interest payments are made in semi-annual installments. The Salton
Sea Notes and Bonds are non-recourse to CE Generation.
The net revenues, equity distributions and royalties from the Partnership
Projects are used to pay principal and interest payments on outstanding senior
secured bonds issued by Funding Corporation, the final series of which is
scheduled to mature in November 2018. Funding Corporation debt is guaranteed by
certain subsidiaries of Magma and secured by the
-43-
capital stock of CE Generation. The proceeds of Funding Corporation debt were
loaned by Funding Corporation pursuant to loan agreements and notes (the
"Imperial Valley Project Loans") to certain subsidiaries of Magma and used for
construction of certain Imperial Valley Projects, refinancing of certain
indebtedness and other purposes. Debt service on the Imperial Valley Project
Loans is used to repay debt service on Funding Corporation debt. The Imperial
Valley Project Loans and the guarantees of Funding Corporation debt are secured
by substantially all of the assets of the guarantors, including the Imperial
Valley Projects, and by the equity interests in the guarantors.
On October 13, 1998, Funding Corporation completed a sale to institutional
investors of $285 million aggregate amount of 7.475% Senior Secured Series F
Bonds due November 30, 2018. A portion of the proceeds was used to fund the cost
of construction of, and was advanced to, the Zinc Recovery Project, which is
indirectly 100% owned by Salton Sea Minerals Corp., a MEHC affiliate not owned
by CE Generation. The direct and indirect owners of the Zinc Facility (the "Zinc
Guarantors", which include Salton Sea Minerals Corp. and Minerals) are among the
guarantors of the Funding Corporation debt. In connection with the divestiture,
MEHC guaranteed the payment by the Zinc Guarantors of a specified portion of the
scheduled debt service on the Imperial Valley Project Loans, including the
current principal amount of approximately $137.8 million, which is included in
note receivable to related party in the accompanied consolidated balance sheet
and associated interest.
Pursuant to a depository agreement, Funding Corporation established a debt
service reserve fund in the form of a letter of credit in the amount of $67.6
million from which scheduled interest and principal payments could have been
made. As a result of the uncertainties related to Edison, the letter of credit
that supports the debt service reserve fund at Salton Sea Funding Corporation
has not been not renewed, and as such cash distributions are not available to CE
Generation until the Salton Sea Funding Corporation debt service reserve fund of
approximately $67.6 million, has been funded or the letter of credit has been
renewed or replaced.
-44-
Annual repayments of the Salton Sea Notes and Bonds for the years ending
December 31 are as follows (in thousands):
AMOUNT
--------
2003........... $ 28,087
2004........... 30,588
2005........... 30,375
2006........... 27,744
2007........... 26,146
Thereafter .... 348,738
--------
Total ......... $491,678
========
CE Generation's ability to obtain distributions from its investment in the
Salton Sea Projects and Partnership Projects is subject to the following
conditions:
o the depositary accounts for the Salton Sea Notes and Bonds must be
fully funded;
o there cannot have occurred and be continuing any default or event of
default under the Salton Sea Notes and Bonds;
o the historical debt service coverage ratio of Funding Corporation for
the prior four fiscal quarters must be at least 1.4 to 1.0, if the
distribution occurs prior to 2000, or 1.5 to 1.0, if the distribution
occurs during or after 2000; and
o there must be sufficient geothermal resources to operate the Salton
Sea Projects at their required levels.
On July 21, 1995, Funding Corporation obtained a $15 million seven-year
revolving credit agreement between Credit Suisse as bank and agent and other
lenders. Interest rate is at the Adjusted Base Rate plus .375% or at the LIBOR
rate plus 100 basis points. On May 26, 2000 the Funding Corporation borrowed $15
million under its revolving credit agreement. The loan was repaid in two
installments, $5 million on July 26, 2000 and $10 million on August 28, 2000.
There were no borrowings during the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001.
7. SENIOR SECURED BONDS
On March 2, 1999, CE Generation issued $400 million of 7.416% Senior Secured
Bonds due 2018. These securities are senior secured debt which rank equally in
right of payment with CE Generation's other senior secured debt permitted under
the indenture for the Securities, share equally in the collateral with CE
Generation's other senior secured debt permitted under the indenture for the
Securities, and rank senior to any of CE Generation's subordinated debt
permitted under the indenture for the Securities. These securities are
effectively subordinated to the existing project financing debt and all other
debt of CE Generation's consolidated subsidiaries.
The Senior Secured Bonds are primarily secured by the following collateral:
o all available cash flow (as defined);
o a pledge of 99% of the equity interests in Salton Sea Power and all of
CE Generation's equity interests in its other consolidated
subsidiaries;
o a pledge of all of the capital stock of SECI Holding Inc.;
o a grant of a lien on and security interest in the depository accounts;
and
o to the extent possible, a grant of a lien on and security interest in
all of CE Generation's other tangible and intangible property, to the
extent assignable.
CE Generation has issued a debt service reserve letter of credit in the amount
of $24.3 million.
Annual repayments of the Senior Secured Bonds for the years ending December 31
are as follows (in thousands):
-45-
AMOUNT
--------
2003........... $ 18,000
2004........... 14,600
2005........... 14,800
2006........... 19,200
2007........... 18,000
Thereafter .... 271,800
--------
Total ......... $356,400
========
8. INCOME TAXES
Provision for income tax is comprised of the following at December 31 (in
thousands):
2002 2001 2000
-------- -------- --------
Current:
Federal ......... $ (873) $ 20,412 $ 15,296
State ........... (58) 4,749 2,758
-------- -------- --------
(931) 25,161 18,054
-------- -------- --------
Deferred:
Federal ......... 8,991 3,762 64
State ........... 1,499 (385) 3,284
-------- -------- --------
10,490 3,377 3,348
-------- -------- --------
Total provision ... $ 9,559 $ 28,538 $ 21,402
======== ======== ========
A reconciliation of the federal statutory tax rate to the effective tax rate
applicable to income before provision for income taxes follows:
2002 2001 2000
----- ----- -----
Federal statutory rate ........................ 35.0% 35.0% 35.0%
Increases (reductions) in taxes resulting from:
Percentage depletion ........................ (18.1) (5.9) (4.8)
Investment and energy tax credits ........... (2.3) (1.7) (13.0)
Goodwill amortization ....................... -- 2.8 3.0
State taxes, net of federal benefit ......... 3.3 2.4 3.6
Minority interest ........................... (8.2) (4.6) (4.9)
Other items, net ............................ 1.1 (3.9) 0.5
---- ---- ----
Effective tax rate ............................ 10.8% 24.1% 19.4%
==== ==== ====
During 2002, the Company made considerable progress on several significant
income tax examination matters for prior tax years, including percentage of
depletion, which resulted in a decrease in income tax expense of $15.1 million
in 2002.
Income tax expense is only provided for the taxable earnings of the Company,
including its partnership interests. No provision for income taxes is provided
in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for the minority interests
share of the partnership earnings.
-46-
Deferred tax liabilities (assets) comprise the following at December 31 (in
thousands):
2002 2001
--------- ---------
Deferred tax liabilities:
Properties, plant, contracts and equipment ......... $ 262,921 $ 260,444
Other .............................................. 1,498 3,048
--------- ---------
Total deferred tax liabilities ................... 264,419 263,492
--------- ---------
Deferred tax assets:
Accruals not currently deductible for tax purposes . (4,919) (16,931)
General business tax credits ....................... (11,467) (8,679)
--------- ---------
Total deferred tax assets ........................ (16,386) (25,610)
--------- ---------
Net deferred tax liabilities ......................... $ 248,033 $ 237,882
========= =========
9. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount at which the instrument
could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than
in a forced sale or liquidation. Although management uses its best judgment in
estimating the fair value of these financial instruments, there are inherent
limitations in any estimation technique. Therefore, the fair value estimates
presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts, which CE
Generation could realize in a current transaction.
The fair value of the note receivable from related party is estimated based on
the quoted market price of the corresponding debt issue.
The fair value of all debt issues listed on exchanges, including the note
receivable from related party which is based on a debt issue listed on an
exchange, has been estimated based on the quoted market prices. The project
loans are estimated to have a fair value equal to the carrying values.
The carrying amounts in the table below are included in the consolidated balance
sheets under the indicated captions (in thousands):
2002 2001
--------------------- ---------------------
Carrying Estimated Carrying Estimated
Value Fair Value Value Fair Value
-------- ---------- -------- ----------
Financial Assets:
Note receivable from related parties . $137,789 $126,765 $139,896 $121,294
Financial Liabilities:
Project loans ........................ 163,142 163,142 199,020 199,020
Salton Sea notes and bonds ........... 491,678 464,552 520,250 478,809
Interest rate swaps .................. 21,023 21,023 16,300 16,300
Senior secured bonds ................. 356,400 313,632 377,000 321,325
-47-
10. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Edison and the California Power Exchange
- ----------------------------------------
Due to reduced liquidity, Edison had failed to pay approximately $119 million
owed under the power purchase agreements with the Imperial Valley Projects
(excluding the Salton Sea V and CE Turbo Projects) for power delivered in the
fourth quarter 2000 and the first quarter 2001. Due to Edison's failure to pay
contractual obligations, the Imperial Valley Projects (excluding the Salton Sea
V and CE Turbo Projects) had established an allowance for doubtful accounts of
approximately $21 million as of December 31, 2001.
As a result of uncertainties related to Edison, the letter of credit that
supports the debt service reserve fund at Salton Sea Funding Corporation has not
been extended beyond its current July 2004 expiration date, and as such, cash
distributions are not available to CE Generation until the Salton Sea Funding
Corporation debt service reserve fund of approximately $67.6 million has been
funded or the letter of credit has been extended beyond its July 2004 expiration
date or replaced. The fund has a cash balance of $46.3 million as of December
31, 2002
Pursuant to a settlement agreement the final payment by Edison for past due
balances was received March 1, 2002. Following the receipt of Edison's payment
of past due balances, the Imperial Valley Projects released the remaining
allowance for doubtful accounts.
Edison has disputed a portion of the settlement agreement and has failed to pay
approximately $3.9 million of capacity bonus payments for the months from
October 2001 through May 2002. On December 10, 2001 the Imperial Valley Projects
(excluding the Salton Sea I, Salton Sea V and CE Turbo Projects) filed a lawsuit
against Edison in California's Imperial County Superior Court seeking a court
order requiring Edison to make the required capacity bonus payments under the
Power Purchase Agreements. Due to Edison's failure to pay these contractual
obligations, the Imperial Valley Projects have established an allowance for
doubtful accounts of approximately $2.7 million. The Project entities are
vigorously pursuing collection of the capacity bonus payments.
On March 25, 2002, Salton Sea II's 10 MW turbine went out of service due to an
uncontrollable force event. Such uncontrollable force event ended, and Salton
Sea II returned to service, on December 17, 2002. Edison has failed to recognize
the uncontrollable force event and as such has not paid amounts otherwise due
and owing and has improperly derated Salton Sea II from 15 MW to 12.5 MW, under
the Salton Sea II Power Purchase Agreement.
In January 2001, the California Power Exchange ("PX") declared bankruptcy. As a
result, the Salton Sea V and CE Turbo Projects have not received payment for
power sold under the Transaction Agreements during December 2000 and January
2001 of approximately $3.8 million. The Imperial Valley Projects have
established an allowance for doubtful accounts for the full amount of this
receivable. The Project entities are vigorously pursuing collection.
Other Commitments
- -----------------
Power Resources has contracted to purchase natural gas for its cogeneration
facility under two separate agreements, an 8-year agreement for up to 40,000
MMBTU per day, which expires in December 2003 and a 15-year agreement for 3,600
MMBTU per day which expires in June 2003. These agreements include annual price
adjustments, and the 15-year agreement includes a provision, which allows the
seller to terminate the agreement with a two-year written notice. As of December
31, 2002, the seller had not elected to terminate this agreement; therefore, the
minimum volumes under the 15-year and 8-year agreements for the year ending
December 31, 2003 are included in the future minimum payments under these
contracts of approximately $24.9 million.
CE Generation's geothermal and cogeneration facilities are qualifying facilities
under and their contracts for the sale of electricity are subject to regulations
under PURPA. In order to promote open competition in the industry, legislation
has been proposed in the U.S. Congress that calls for either a repeal of PURPA
on a prospective basis or the significant restructuring of the regulations
governing the electric industry, including sections of PURPA. Current federal
legislative proposals would not abrogate, amend, or modify existing contracts
with electric utilities. The ultimate outcome of any proposed legislation is
unknown at this time.
The Saranac Partnership has a contract to purchase natural gas from a third
party, for its cogeneration facility for a period of 15 years for an amount up
to 51,000 MMBtus per day which expires in 2009. The price for such deliveries is
a stated rate, escalated annually at a rate of 4%. The minimum volumes under the
agreement for the years ending December 31 are included in the future minimum
payments under the contract as follows (in thousands):
-48-
AMOUNT
--------
2003........... $ 63,373
2004........... 66,088
2005........... 68,544
2006........... 71,286
2007........... 74,134
Thereafter .... 130,123
--------
Total ......... $473,548
========
The Salton Sea V Project is obligated to supply the electricity demands of the
Zinc Recovery Project, which commenced operations in December 2002, at the
market rates available to the Salton Sea V Project, less the wheeling costs.
Salton Sea V Project, which commenced operations in the third quarter of 2000,
expects to sell up to 22 MW of its output to Minerals. The remainder of the
Salton Sea V Project output is sold through other market transactions.
Environmental
- -------------
The Company is subject to numerous legislative and regulatory environmental
protection requirements involving air and water pollution, waste management,
hazardous chemical use, noise abatement, and land use aesthetics.
State and federal environmental laws and regulations currently have, and future
modifications may have, the effect of (i) increasing the lead time for the
construction of new facilities, (ii) significantly increasing the total cost of
new facilities, (iii) requiring modification of the Company's existing
facilities, (iv) increasing the risk of delay on construction projects, (v)
increasing the Company's cost of waste disposal and (vi) reducing the
reliability of service provided by the Company and the amount of energy
available from the Company's facilities. Any of such items could have a
substantial impact on amounts required to be expended by the Company in the
future. Expenditures for ongoing compliance with environmental regulations that
relate to current operations are expensed or capitalized as appropriate.
Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by past operations, and
which do not contribute to current or future revenue generation, are expensed.
Liabilities are recorded when environmental assessments indicate that
remediation efforts are probable and the costs can be reasonably estimated.
Estimates of the liability are based upon currently available facts, existing
technology and presently enacted laws and regulations taking into consideration
the likely effects of inflation and other social and economic factors, and
include estimates of associated legal costs. These amounts also consider prior
experience in remediating sites, other companies' clean-up experience and data
released by the Environmental Protection Agency or other organizations. These
estimated liabilities are subject to revision in future periods based on actual
costs or new circumstances, and are included in the accompanying balance sheets
at their undiscounted amounts. As of December 31, 2002 and 2001, the
environmental liabilities recorded on the balance sheet were $5.3 million and
$4.2 million, respectively.
11. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Pursuant to the Administrative Services Agreement, MEHC provides certain
administrative and management services to CE Generation, and MEHC's executive,
financial, legal, tax and other corporate staff departments perform certain
services for CE Generation. Expenses incurred by MEHC and allocated to CE
Generation were estimated based on the individual services and expense items
provided. There were no allocated expenses in 2002 however allocated expenses
totaled $3.4 million in 2001 and $2.5 million in 2000, and are included in
general and administrative expense. On August 1, 2002, the Administrative
Services Agreement between MEHC and CE Generation was amended to provide for a
fixed monthly fee in lieu of certain expenses, which were being allocated. The
fixed fee, which was retroactive to January 1, 2002 and ends December 2004, is
$258,333 per month and is included in general and administrative expense.
The Company participates in multi-employer pension plans sponsored by MEHC. The
Company's contributions to the various plans was approximately $1.8 million,
$1.6 million and $1.2 million in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
On May 26, 2000, CE Generation issued a $6.5 million 10% note due June 15, 2005,
in favor of MidAmerican and a $6.5 million 10% note due June 15, 2005 in favor
of EPME Company. The notes were repaid on October 16, 2000.
-49-
On September 29, 2000, Salton Sea Power and CE Turbo entered into an agreement
to sell all available power from the Salton Sea V Project and CE Turbo Project
to EPME. Under the terms of the agreement, EPME purchased and sold available
power on behalf of Salton Sea Power and CE Turbo, into the California ISO
markets. The purchase price for the available power was equivalent to the value
actually received by EPME for the sale of such power, including renewable
premiums.
On January 17, 2001, Salton Sea Power and CE Turbo entered into a Transaction
Agreement to sell available power from the Salton Sea V Project and CE Turbo
Project to EPME. Under the terms of the agreement, at the option of Salton Sea
Power and CE Turbo, EPME purchased all available power from the Salton Sea V
Project and CE Turbo Project based on day ahead price quotes received from EPME.
On March 27, 2001 and May 1, 2001, the Imperial Valley Projects entered into
Transaction Agreements to sell available power to EPME based on percentages of
the Dow Jones SP-15 Index. On June 22, 2001, the Imperial Valley Projects
(excluding the Salton Sea V Project and CE Turbo Project) ceased selling
available power to EPME and resumed power sales to Edison under the Power
Purchase Agreements ("PPAs"). Effective September 16, 2002 Salton Sea Power and
CE Turbo entered into Transaction Agreements to sell available power to EPME at
increased percentages of the Dow Jones SP-15 Index.
Pursuant to these agreements, sales to EPME from the Company totaled $8.9
million, $102.8 million and $19.5 million in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
As of December 31, 2002 and 2001, accounts receivable from EPME were $1.4
million and $11.8 million, respectively.
Pursuant to the November 1, 1998 Amended and Restated Power Sales Agreements,
Salton Sea Power and CE Turbo are to provide Minerals with its full electrical
energy requirements at the market rates available to them, less wheeling costs.
Effective August 1, 2002, Salton Sea Power and CE Turbo amended their respective
power sale agreements with Minerals to provide for a fixed price of $31.00 per
megawatt hour for all hours of August 1, 2002 through December 31, 2002.
Pursuant to these agreements, sales to Minerals from Salton Sea Power totaled
$0.4 million and $0.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001,
respectively, and there were no sales to Minerals from CE Turbo for the years
ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. There were no material accounts
receivable balances at December 31, 2002 and 2001.
12. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On January 29, 2003, TransAlta USA Inc. ("TransAlta"), a wholly owned subsidiary
of TransAlta Corporation, purchased EPME's 50% interest in CE Generation.
Pursuant to a Transaction Agreement dated January 29, 2003, Salton Sea Power and
CE Turbo and began selling available power to TransAlta on February 12, 2003
based on percentages of the Dow Jones SP-15 Index. Such agreement will expire on
October 15, 2003.
-50-
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.
Not applicable
-51-
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT.
EXECUTIVE OFFICER POSITION
Edward J. Heinrich President
Douglas L. Anderson Senior Vice President
Wayne F. Irmiter Vice President and Controller
Stefan A. Bird Director
Ian A. Bourne Director
J. Thomas Coyle Director
Patrick J. Goodman Director
EDWARD J. HEINRICH, 49, President of CE Generation, LLC, is responsible for
independent power plant operations and construction in the United States.
Heinrich joined the company in November 1993. From December 1987 to October
1993, he was site manager for Sithe Energies U.S.A., Inc., a non-utility
developer of power facilities. Prior to that, Heinrich worked in engineering for
the U.S. Navy, with a focus on turbine-powered ships. Heinrich has also served
as a project manager for Sundt Corporation, a construction and construction
management company.
DOUGLAS L. ANDERSON, 45, Senior Vice President and General Counsel of
MidAmerican and a Senior Vice President of CE Generation. Mr. Anderson joined
MidAmerican in February 1993. From 1990 to 1993, Mr. Anderson was a business
attorney with Fraser, Stryker, in Omaha. From 1987 through 1989, Mr. Anderson
was a principal in the firm Anderson & Anderson. Prior to that, he was an
attorney with Foster, Swift, Collins & Smith, P.C. in Lansing, Michigan.
WAYNE F. IRMITER, 37, Vice President and Controller of CE Generation. Mr.
Irmiter joined MidAmerican as Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer in
November 2002. Mr. Irmiter is a Certified Public Accountant and from 1988 to
1993 he worked in public accounting. Most recently, Mr. Irmiter was with
Gateway, Inc. in various management positions including Director-Strategic
Initiatives and Director-Finance.
STEFAN A. BIRD, 36, Vice President, Project Development of MidAmerican and a
director of CE Generation. Mr. Bird joined MidAmerican in January of 1998 as
Project Development Manager and was promoted to Vice President, Project
Development in August 1999. Prior to joining MidAmerican, Mr. Bird held various
positions at Koch Industries from 1989 to 1997 including Director of Finance,
Latin America for Koch Industries International in Mexico City; Director of
Marketing and Risk Manager for Koch Power Services in Houston, Texas; Senior
Financial Analyst for Koch International Financial Services in Fribourg,
Switzerland; Project Manager, Corporate Development for Koch Industries in
Wichita, Kansas; and Project Engineer and Maintenance Planner for Koch Refining
Company in St. Paul, Minnesota.
-52-
IAN A. BOURNE, 55, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
TransAlta and a director of CE Generation. Mr. Bourne joined TransAlta in
January 1998 as senior vice president and chief financial officer and was
appointed to his current position June 1, 1998. Immediately prior to joining
TransAlta, Mr. Bourne had been senior vice-president and chief financial
officer of Canada Post Corporation from 1992. Prior to 1992 Mr. Bourne gained
extensive financial experience with General Electric, including positions as
European treasurer, based in London; chief financial officer for GE Canada, and
chief financial officer for GE Medical Systems Europe, based in Paris.
J. THOMAS COYLE, 55, President of TransAlta Energy Marketing U.S. Inc. and a
director of CE Generation. Mr. Coyle joined TransAlta in 1998 as Director, Risk
Portfolio Management, Energy Marketing. Prior to joining TransAlta, Mr. Coyle
held various positions at Petro-Canada from 1986 to 1997 including Portfolio
Manager - Natural Gas Marketing, Manager Market Development - Natural Gas
Marketing and Risk Manager.
PATRICK J. GOODMAN, 36, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
MidAmerican and a director of CE Generation. Mr. Goodman joined MidAmerican in
June 1995 and served as Manager of Consolidation Accounting until September 1996
when he was promoted to Controller. Mr. Goodman was promoted to Chief Financial
Officer in April 1999. Prior to joining MidAmerican, Mr. Goodman was a financial
manager for National Indemnity Co. from 1993 to 1995 and a certified public
accountant at Coopers & Lybrand from 1989 to 1993.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.
CE Generation's directors and executive officers receive no remuneration for
serving in such capacities.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Fifty percent of CE Generation's interests are owned by MidAmerican and the
other 50% are owned by the Class A Holder. There is no public trading market for
CE Generation's membership interests. None of the directors or executive
officers beneficially own any of the equity interests. MidAmerican's common
stock is not publicly traded. TransAlta is owned by TransAlta Corporation. Both
El Paso Corporation's and TransAlta Corporation's common stock is publicly
traded on the New York Stock Exchange.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS.
CE Generation is 50% owned by MidAmerican and 50% owned by the Class A Holder.
CE Generation's activities are restricted by the terms of the indenture for the
Securities to (1) ownership of the Company's subsidiaries and related
activities, (2) acting as issuer of securities and other indebtedness as
permitted under the indenture and related activities and (3) other activities
which could not reasonably be expected to result in a material adverse effect so
long as the rating agencies confirm that these activities will not result in a
downgrade of their ratings of the Securities. CE Generation and each of the
assigning subsidiaries have been organized and are operated as legal entities
separate and apart from MidAmerican, TransAlta and their other affiliates, and,
accordingly, the Company's assets and the assets of the assigning subsidiaries
will not be generally available to satisfy the obligations of MidAmerican,
TransAlta or any of their other affiliates. However, the Company's and the
assigning subsidiaries' unrestricted cash and other assets which are available
for distribution may, subject to applicable law and the terms of CE Generation's
and the assigning subsidiaries' financing arrangements, be advanced, loaned,
paid as dividends or otherwise distributed or contributed to MidAmerican,
TransAlta or their affiliates. The securities are non-recourse to MidAmerican
and TransAlta.
MidAmerican entered into an administrative services agreement with CE Generation
and TransAlta entered into a power marketing services agreement and a fuel
management services agreement with CE Generation. MidAmerican and TransAlta are
reimbursed for the actual costs and expenses of performing their obligations
under these agreements. These agreements each have an initial term of one year
and then continue from year to year until terminated by either party.
CE Generation also entered into an agreement with MidAmerican and EPME to
provide EPME with a right of first refusal for the Company to participate in the
development of any future geothermal power projects or combined
-53-
geothermal power and mineral recovery projects proposed by MidAmerican in the
area of the geothermal reservoir that currently supplies geothermal resources to
the Imperial Valley projects in return for the payment of a royalty to
MidAmerican. If EPME elects not to participate, the agreement gives MidAmerican
the right to develop the new project upon a showing that there are sufficient
geothermal resources for both the new project and the Company's existing
projects. EPME assigned all its interests in the agreement to TransAlta.
ITEM 14. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures: Based on the
Company's evaluation as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of
this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the principal executive officer and
principal financial officer have concluded that the disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-14(c) and 15d-14(c)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act)) are
effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the
Company in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act are
recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms. It
should be noted that the design of any system of controls is based in
part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events,
and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in
achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions,
regardless of how remote.
b) Changes in internal controls. There were no significant changes in the
Company's internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of their
evaluation. There were no significant deficiencies or material
weaknesses, and therefore there were no corrective actions taken.
-54-
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K.
(a) Financial Statements and Schedules
(i) Financial Statements
Financial Statements are included in Part II of this Form 10-K
(ii) Financial Statement Schedules
See Schedule II on page 56 .
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
The Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K on November 14, 2002.
(c) Exhibits
The exhibits listed on the accompanying Exhibit Index are filed as
part of this Annual Report.
(d) Financial statements required by Regulations S-X, which are excluded
from the Annual Report by Rule 14a-3(b).
Not Applicable
-55-
SCHEDULE II
CE GENERATION, LLC
CONSOLIDATED VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
FOR THE THREE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002
(Amounts in thousands)
COLUMN A COLUMN B COLUMN C COLUMN D COLUMN E
- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Balance at Additions Balance
Beginning Charged at End
Description of Year to Income Deductions of Year
- ----------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Allowance for doubtful accounts
Year ended 2002 ...................... $ 24,754 $ -- $ (18,258) $ 6,496
========== ========== ========= ==========
Year ended 2001 ...................... $ -- $ 24,754 $ -- $ 24,754
========== ========== ========= ==========
Year ended 2000 ...................... $ -- $ -- $ -- $ --
========== ========== ========= ==========
Reserves Not Deducted from Assets (1):
Year ended 2002 ...................... $ 6,132 $ 3,509 $ (3,341) $ 6,300
========== ========== ========= ==========
Year ended 2001 ...................... $ 9,102 $ 2,000 $ (4,970) $ 6,132
========== ========== ========= ==========
Year ended 2000 ...................... $ 3,540 $ 8,150 $ (2,588) $ 9,102
========== ========== ========= ==========
(1) Reserves not deducted from assets include estimated liabilities for
litigation and environmental compliance at the Imperial Valley Projects.
-56-
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Omaha, State
of Nebraska, on this 28th day of March, 2003.
CE Generation LLC
/s/ Edward J. Heinrich
-----------------------
By: Edward J. Heinrich
President
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report
has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and
in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature Date
- ---------------------------- --------------
/s/ Edward J. Heinrich March 28, 2003
- -----------------------
Edward J. Heinrich
President
(Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ Wayne F. Irmiter March 28, 2003
- --------------------
Wayne F. Irmiter
Vice President and Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)
/s/ Stefan A. Bird March 28, 2003
- -------------------
Stefan A. Bird
Director
/s/ Ian A Bourne* March 28, 2003
- -----------------
Ian A. Bourne
Director
/s/ J. Thomas Coyle* March 28, 2003
- ---------------------------
J. Thomas Coyle
Director
/s/ Patrick J. Goodman* March 28, 2003
- ----------------------
Patrick J. Goodman
Director
* By: /s/ Douglas L. Anderson
- ------------------------------
Douglas L. Anderson
Attorney-in-Fact
-57-
SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION FOR FORM 10-K
CERTIFICATIONS
- --------------
I, Edward J. Heinrich, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of CE Generation, LLC;
2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;
5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and
6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Date: March 28, 2003
/s/ Edward J. Heinrich
----------------------
Edward J. Heinrich
President
(principal executive officer)
-58-
SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION FOR FORM 10-K
CERTIFICATIONS
- --------------
I, Wayne F. Irmiter, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of CE Generation, LLC;
2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;
5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and
6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Date: March 28, 2003
/s/ Wayne F. Irmiter
--------------------
Wayne F. Irmiter
Vice President and Controller
(principal financial officer)
-59-
EXHIBIT INDEX
3.1 Certificate of Formation of CE Generation, LLC (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-4).
3.2 Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Operating Agreement of CE
Generation, LLC.
3.3 First Amendment to Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Operating
Agreement of CE Generation, LLC, dated as of October 28, 2002.
4.1 Indenture, dated as of March 2, 1999, by and between CE Generation, LLC and
Chase Manhattan Bank and Trust Company, National Association (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form
S-4).
4.2 Form of First Supplemental Indenture to be entered into by and between CE
Generation, LLC and Chase Manhattan Bank and Trust Company, National
Association, Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the
Company's Registration Statement on Form S-4).
4.3 Purchase Agreement, dated February 24, 1999, by and among CE Generation,
LLC, Credit Suisse First Boston Corporation and Lehman Brothers, Inc.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Company's Registration
Statement on Form S-4).
4.4 Exchange and Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of March 2, 1999, by
and among CE Generation, LLC, Credit Suisse First Boston Corporation and
Lehman Brothers, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the
Company's Registration Statement on Form S-4).
4.5 Debt Service Reserve Letter of Credit and Reimbursement Agreement, dated as
of March 2, 1999, by and among CE Generation, LLC, the banks named therein
and Credit Suisse First Boston, as Agent (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.5 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-4).
4.6 Deposit and Disbursement Agreement, dated as of March 2, 1999, by and among
CE Generation, LLC, Magma Power Company, Salton Sea Power Company, Falcon
Seaboard Resources, Inc., Falcon Seaboard Power Corporation, Falcon
Seaboard Oil Company, California Energy Development Corporation, CE Texas
Energy LLC and Chase Manhattan Bank and Trust Company, National
Association, as Collateral Agent and Depositary Bank (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.6 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form
S-4).
4.7 Intercreditor Agreement, dated as of March 2, 1999, by and among CE
Generation, LLC, Magma Power Company, Salton Sea Power Company, Falcon
Seaboard Resources, Inc., Falcon Seaboard Power Corporation, Falcon
Seaboard Oil Company, California Energy Development Corporation, CE Texas
Energy LLC, Credit Suisse First Boston and Chase Manhattan Bank and Trust
Company, National Association, as Trustee, Collateral Agent and Depositary
Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 to the Company's
Registration Statement on Form S-4).
4.8 Assignment and Security Agreement, dated as of March 2, 1999, by and among
Magma Power Company, Salton Sea Power Company, Falcon Seaboard Resources,
Inc., Falcon Seaboard Power Corporation, Falcon Seaboard Oil Company,
California Energy Development Corporation, CE Texas Energy LLC, Credit
Suisse First Boston and Chase Manhattan Bank and Trust Company, National
Association, as Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8
to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-4).
4.9 Assignment and Security Agreement, dated as of March 2, 1999, by and
between CE Generation, LLC and Chase Manhattan Bank and Trust Company,
National Association, as Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.9 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-4).
4.10 Pledge Agreement (SSPC Stock), dated as of March 2, 1999, by Magma Power
Company in favor of Chase Manhattan Bank and Trust Company, National
Association, as Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.10
to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-4).
-60-
4.11 Pledge Agreement (FSRI Stock and CEDC Stock), dated as of March 2, 1999 by
CE Generation, LLC in favor of Chase Manhattan Bank and Trust Company,
National Association, as Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.11 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-4).
4.12 Securities Account Control Agreement, dated as of March 2, 1999, by and
among CE Generation, LLC, Magma Power Company, Salton Sea Power Company,
Falcon Seaboard Resources, Inc., Falcon Seaboard Power Corporation, Falcon
Seaboard Oil Company, California Energy Development Corporation, CE Texas
Energy LLC, Credit Suisse First Boston and Chase Manhattan Bank and Trust
Company, National Association, as Collateral Agent and Depositary Bank
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.12 to the Company's Registration
Statement on Form S-4).
24.0 Power of Attorney
99.1 Chief Executive Officer's Certificate Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
99.2 Chief Financial Officer's Certificate Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
-61-