Back to GetFilings.com

UNITED STATES

FORM 10-K

[X]	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE

For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2000

or

[   ]	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE

For the transition period from             to             .

Commission File Number 1-8703

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:  None

      Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes  [X]  No  [   ]

      Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.    [   ]

      As of August 31, 2000, the aggregate market value of the voting stock of the Registrant held by non-affiliates of the Registrant was $863.4 million.

      As of August 31, 2000, the number of outstanding shares of Common Stock, par value $.01 per share, of the Registrant was 147,551,931.

      Information required by Part III is incorporated by reference to portions of the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for the 2000 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the close of the 2000 fiscal year.

WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION

INDEX TO ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

      The Company has a 52 or 53-week fiscal year. In order to align its manufacturing and financial calendars, effective during the three months ended December 31, 1999, the Company changed its fiscal calendar so that each fiscal month ends on the Friday nearest to the last day of the calendar month. Prior to this change, the Company’s fiscal month ended on the Saturday nearest to the last day of the calendar month. The change did not have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations or financial position. The 1998, 1999 and 2000 fiscal years ended on June 27, July 3, and June 30, respectively, and consisted of 52 weeks for the fiscal years 1998 and 2000, and 53 weeks for the fiscal year 1999.

      Unless otherwise indicated, references herein to specific years and quarters are to the Company’s fiscal years and fiscal quarters.

      The Company’s principal executive offices are located at 8105 Irvine Center Drive, Irvine, California 92618. The Company’s telephone number is (949) 932-5000 and its web site is http://www.westerndigital.com. The information on the web site is not incorporated in this report.

2

PART I

Item 1.  Business

General

      Western Digital Corporation (the “Company” or “Western Digital”) designs, develops, manufactures and markets hard drives featuring leading-edge technology. A hard drive is a storage device found in most computers that stores data on one or more rotating magnetic disks that provide fast access to data that must be readily available to users of computers or other devices. The Company’s hard drives are designed for the desktop PC market and for the emerging market for hard drives specially designed for digital audio-visual applications, such as new digital video recording devices, digital cable set-top boxes, satellite television boxes, audio/ visual juke boxes and video game devices. The Company’s hard drive products currently include 3.5-inch form factor hard drives ranging in storage capacity from 7.5 gigabytes (“GB”) to 45.0 GB. The Company sells its products worldwide to computer manufacturers for inclusion in their computer systems or subsystems and to distributors, resellers and retailers. The Company’s products are currently manufactured in Malaysia. In January 2000, the Company announced its decision to exit the market for hard drives manufactured for enterprise computer systems and closed its Rochester, Minnesota enterprise hard drive design center.

      The Company continuously evaluates opportunities to extend its data storage product offerings and to expand beyond the traditional market for hard drives into new markets which meet certain predefined criteria. The Company considers new or high growth markets for data or content storage, management, and communication which have few entrenched competitors and offer the prospect of a sustained competitive advantage through unique or proprietary technology. In February 1999, the Company acquired Connex, Inc. (“Connex”), a San Jose-based startup company formed to develop storage solutions for the Windows NT and UNIX server environments for the rapidly changing storage market. Connex’s first product, the “N3000™” is a network attached storage (“NAS”) appliance targeted at workgroups and small departments where multiple users access shared data files over a local area network. Connex has also developed a suite of software products for the management of a storage area network (“SAN”). For further discussion of Connex, see under the heading “Products — Products Developed by Connex”, and see Part II, Item 7, under the heading “Risk factors relating to Western Digital particularly.”

      In February 2000, the Company contributed the assets comprising its emerging business in analytical software for data warehouses to a newly formed subsidiary, SageTree, Inc. (“SageTree”). The Company formed this subsidiary in anticipation of the possibility of obtaining financing from outside the Company for the operation and development of this emerging business. In June 2000, SageTree received a direct investment from NCR Corporation in exchange for a minority interest in SageTree. SageTree has expanded the functionality of its software and now offers SageQuest™, a software package for enterprise-wide supply chain management, product lifecycle management and decision support in the manufacturing industry. For further discussion of SageTree, see Part II, Item 7, under the heading “Risk factors relating to Western Digital particularly.”

      The Company will monitor the development of new markets related to data or content storage and storage management, and communication of digital content and network intelligence, and may from time to time offer new products or services to address appropriate new markets.

Industry

      Desktop PC Market. According to International Data Corporation, the desktop computer segment is the largest segment of the worldwide personal computer market, accounting for approximately 78% of global personal computer shipments in calendar 1999. As a result, desktop computers were the leading source of demand for hard drives, accounting for more than 70% of all hard drive units shipped worldwide in calendar 1999, according to International Data Corporation. Over 90% of Western Digital’s hard drive unit shipments in 2000 were sold to this market. Desktop personal computers for entry level to experienced users are used in

3

	•	continued improvements in desktop computing price to performance ratios;
	•	continued growth of the sub-$1,000 PC market;
	•	the rapid accumulation of data resulting from the digitization of information previously stored in paper form;
	•	larger file sizes created by multimedia-intensive applications such as high-fidelity audio and video; and
	•	the exchange of increasing volumes of digital content among users across the Internet and intranets with the proliferation of collaborative computing and sharing of audio and video content.

      Future demand growth for desktop computer hard drives also may be driven by new and emerging hard drive markets. In August 2000, International Data Corporation forecasted that the worldwide desktop computer hard drive market would grow from approximately 133 million units in calendar 1999 to 247 million units in calendar 2004, reflecting a compound annual growth rate of approximately 13.2%. However, it forecasts that revenue growth will only be approximately 3.6% through calendar 2004, reflecting the impact of severe price competition. See Part II, Item 7, under the heading “Risk factors related to the hard drive industry in which we operate.”

      Desktop PCs are used in a number of environments, ranging from homes to businesses and multi-user networks. Software applications are used on desktop PCs primarily word processing, spreadsheet, desktop publishing, database management, multimedia, entertainment and other related applications. Desktop PCs typically utilize the Enhanced Integrated Drive Electronics (“EIDE”) interface for their hard drives. The Company believes the minimum storage requirements in the past year for entry-level PCs were generally 6.8 GB to 10.2 GB of formatted capacity.

      The industry continues to supply increased capacity per unit as users’ system needs increase and technological and manufacturing advances continue to make higher capacity drives more affordable. In the mainstream desktop PC market, the Company believes that the rate of increase in storage capacity per unit has recently outpaced the rate of increase in demand for such capacity. This will result in the Company changing its product mix, with an increasing percentage of lower capacity hard drives manufactured with fewer heads and disks per unit. The Company believes that even though units demanded will increase, this changing product mix will reduce the average selling price per hard drive unit in the desktop PC market. In contrast, the emerging use of hard drives to record and play back audio and video content in the audio-visual market is expected to create demand for storage capacity that will exceed the growth in demand for increased capacity in the desktop PC market. Overall, industry sources believe that the current rate of increase in storage capacity per unit shipped will continue for the foreseeable future. Accordingly, the Company believes that time-to-market, time-to-volume and time-to-quality leadership with higher capacity drives at attractive price levels will continue to be critical to its future success in serving this market.

      Users of desktop PCs, especially entry-level desktop PCs, have become increasingly price sensitive. In 1999 the market for desktop PC’s priced below $1,000 grew significantly, and in 2000 the market for desktop PC’s priced below $800 was the fastest growing segment of the market. These systems typically do not contain high performance hard drives, but the growth of these segments has placed downward price pressure on higher cost systems as well, thereby contributing to the increasing price pressures on desktop hard drives. The Company has development efforts underway to specifically address the entry-level consumer PC market. See Part II, Item 7, under the heading “Risk factors related to the hard drive industry in which we operate.”

Products

      The Company’s WD Caviar® and WD Protege™ brand products are designed to serve the advanced and value portions, respectively, of the desktop PC hard drive market, and its WD Performer™ brand products are designed to serve the emerging audio-visual portion of the hard drive market.

      Desktop PC Products. The WD Caviar family currently consists of 1.0” high, 3.5-inch form factor products with capacities ranging from 7.5 GB to 45.0 GB and rotation speeds of 5400 and 7200 revolutions per minutes (“rpm”). In 1998 the Company introduced the Data Lifeguard™ feature, an exclusive data reliability

4

      The WD Caviar product line generally leverages a common architecture or “platform” for various products with different capacities to serve the differing needs of the desktop PC market. This platform strategy results in commonality of components across different products, which reduces exposure to changes in demand, facilitates inventory management and allows the Company to achieve lower costs through economies of scale purchasing. This platform strategy also enables computer manufacturer customers to leverage their qualification efforts onto successive product models. The Company expects to utilize the WD Caviar platform strategy as it develops products for the emerging market for hard drives specifically designed for audio-visual applications, such as new digital video recording devices.

      Products for Emerging Audio-visual Markets. Audio-visual content stored for entertainment has historically been stored on removable media, such as compact disks (“CDs”), digital video disks (“DVDs”), and videotape. These media have also been used to transport and deliver the content. The emergence of broadband communications as a means of delivery of digital content makes it unnecessary to use the removable media itself for delivery. This allows hard drives to become the storage media for this digital, audio-visual content as it is delivered through broadband communications. This has led to the use of hard drives in products for consumer broadband communications networks, such as cable and satellite networks. Audio-visual applications such as digital video recording devices represent a developing market opportunity for the Company’s hard drive technologies. Hard drive technology makes it possible to simultaneously record and play back content; to pause and skip forward and backward during live broadcasts; and to rapidly access large amounts of audio-visual content.

      The Company offers customized design capabilities and unique hard drive technologies for consumer applications; however, where practical, the Company intends to leverage its existing product line architectures for the various products for the audio-visual market. The Company is currently offering the WD Performer™ hard drive line, designed for use in consumer audio-video applications. It is also developing hard drives and products incorporating hard drive technology for consumer electronics products including digital cable set-top boxes, satellite television boxes, audio-visual juke boxes and video game devices. Because the market for these products has not yet developed, it is too early to project the likely size and growth of such market. For further discussion of this product development effort, see Part II, Item 7, under the heading “Risk factors relating to Western Digital particularly.”

      Products Developed by Connex. Connex offers a network attached storage appliance, the N3000™, featuring a fully integrated controller, up to six hard drives, an integrated tape for backup, automatic connectivity for remote management, and plug-and-play installation capability. The system includes Connex’s storage management software. Connex is offering an expanded version of this product, the N3100™, which features up to eight hard drives. The systems are marketed to workgroups and small departments where multiple users access shared data files over a local area network. Connex has also developed a suite of software products for the management of a storage area network. A storage area network is a network of storage devices connected by Fibre Channel or other high-speed network, which allows an enterprise to store and manage large amounts of data in a centralized method off of an enterprise’s local area network. Connex’s SANavigator™ product, manages the overall SAN, discovers SAN devices, physically and logically maps devices, manages data paths, launches other applications, monitors the health of the SAN and remedies problems through an intuitive, easy-to-use graphical user interface. Connex sells its products through distributors and value-added resellers and is targeting select original equipment manufacturers. Its hardware products are manufactured by third parties under contract manufacturing arrangements, in accordance with

5

      Products Developed by SageTree. SageTree offers analytical software, branded SageQuest™, and services for enterprise-wide supply chain intelligence, product lifecycle intelligence and decision support in the manufacturing industry. The SageQuest™ software is a Web-based suite of packaged analytic applications designed for the manufacturing industry. The applications collect and synthesize dissimilar data across an enterprise and transform the data into customized, accurate reports that assist management in solving business and operational issues. This allows rapid analysis and management of a manufacturer’s products and components at all stages of the product lifecycle, including products in manufacturing and in the field. The applications use advanced analytics and data warehousing technology to create “supply chain intelligence”. The objectives of supply chain intelligence include improved manufacturing yield, product quality and reliability, and customer satisfaction. The Company expects to begin selling SageQuest software in 2001.

      SageTree also offers professional services for data warehousing and analytic applications, including manufacturing and supply chain consulting, implementation services, advanced analytics, training and post-implementation support.

Technology and Product Development

      Hard drives are used to record, store and retrieve digital data. Their performance attributes are currently better than removable or floppy disks, optical disk drives and tape, and they are more cost effective than semiconductor technology. The primary measures of hard drive performance include:

	“Storage capacity” — the amount of data that can be stored on the hard drive — commonly expressed in gigabytes.
	“Average seek time” — the time needed to position the heads over a selected track on the disk surface — commonly expressed in milliseconds.
	“Internal data transfer rate” — the rate at which data is transferred to and from the disk — commonly expressed in megabits per second.
	“Spindle rotational speed” — the rotational speed of the disks inside the hard drive — commonly expressed in rpms or revolutions per minute.

      All of the Company’s hard drive products employ similar technology. The main components of the hard drive are the head disk assembly and the printed circuit board. The head disk assembly includes the head, media (disks), head positioning mechanism (actuator) and spin motor. These components are contained in a hard base plate protective package in a contamination-free environment. The printed circuit board includes custom integrated circuits, an interface connector to the host computer and a power connector.

      The head disk assembly is comprised of one or more disks positioned around a spindle hub that rotates the disks by a spin motor. Disks are made of a smooth substrate to which a thin coating of magnetic materials is applied. Each disk has a head suspended directly above it, which can read data from or write data to the spinning disk. The sensor element of the head, also known as the slider, is getting progressively smaller, resulting in reduced material costs.

      The integrated circuits on the printed circuit board typically include a drive interface and a controller. The drive interface receives instructions from the computer, while the controller directs the flow of data to or from the disks and controls the heads. The location of data on each disk is logically maintained in concentric tracks which are divided into sectors. The computer sends instructions to the controller to read data from or write data to the disks based on track and sector locations. Guided by instructions from the controller, the head stack assembly is pivoted and swung across the disk by a head actuator or motor until it reaches the selected track of a disk, where the data is recorded or retrieved.

      Industry standard interfaces are utilized to allow the disk drive to communicate with the computer. Currently, the primary interface for desktop PCs is EIDE. Increasingly, work station computers are using the EIDE interface as well. As computer performance continues to improve, the hard drive will need to deliver information faster than this interface can handle. Accordingly the desktop PC industry plans to transition to

6

      Storage capacity of the hard drive is determined by the number of disks and each disk’s areal density, which is a measure of the amount of data that can be stored on the recording surface of the disk. Areal density is generally measured in megabits per square inch of disk surface. The higher the areal density, the more information can be stored on a single platter. As the areal density increases, fewer disks and/or heads are required to achieve a given drive capacity, thus reducing product costs through reduced component requirements.

      Head technology is one of the variables affecting areal density. The desktop hard drive industry has completed a transition to magnetoresistive head technology, which allows significantly higher storage capacities than the previously utilized thin-film head technology. Magnetoresistive heads have discrete read and write structures which provide more signal than the older thin-film inductive heads. This allows significantly higher areal densities, which increases storage capacity per disk and improves manufacturing margin and product reliability. The Company completed the transition to magnetoresistive head technology in 1999 and in 2000 completed the transition to the next generation of head technology, known as giant magnetoresistive. Certain of the Company’s competitors in the desktop PC hard drive market moved more quickly than the Company into magnetoresistive head technology, achieving time-to-market leadership at higher capacity points; however, the Company was a leader in the transition to giant magnetoresistive head technology. The Company began volume shipments of its first giant magnetoresistive-based hard drive products for the desktop PC market in the third quarter of 1999, and currently all of the Company’s desktop product offerings employ giant magnetoresistive head technology.

      Constant innovations in research and development are essential to the Company’s ability to compete. Hard drive providers are evaluating or implementing a number of technological innovations designed to further increase hard drive performance and reduce product costs, including simplifying the electronic architecture by combining the traditional controller, channel, microprocessor and servo-interface management functions of traditional hard drive microprocessors on a single integrated circuit. Moreover, to consistently achieve timely introduction and rapid volume production of new products, some hard drive providers are striving to simplify their product design processes by focusing on creating extendible core technology platforms which utilize common firmware and mechanical designs and re-use of manufacturing tooling and application specific integrated circuits across various product generations and product lines.

Sales and Distribution

      The Company sells its products globally to computer manufacturers, distributors, value-added resellers, dealers, system integrators, retailers and internet-based retailers. Manufacturers typically purchase components such as hard drives and assemble them into the computer systems they build. Distributors typically sell the Company’s drives to small manufacturers, dealers, system integrators and other resellers.

      Manufacturers. Sales to manufacturers accounted for 69%, 70% and 65% of consolidated revenues in 1998, 1999 and 2000, respectively. The Company’s major computer manufacturer customers include Apple Computer, Compaq Computer, Dell Computer, Fujitsu, Gateway, Hewlett-Packard, IBM, Intel, Micron Electronics and NEC. During 1998, 1999 and 2000, sales to Compaq accounted for 14%, 21%, and 21% of revenues, respectively. The Company believes that its success depends on its ability to maintain and improve its strong relationships with the leading computer manufacturers. Western Digital, Quantum, Maxtor and Seagate have historically had the highest market share with these manufacturers. The increase in the number of qualified suppliers to the leading manufacturers, combined with the continued growth of the sub-$1,000 PC market, has placed continuous downward pressure on hard drive prices. This pressure, in turn, has reduced average gross margins for hard drive suppliers.

      The leading PC computer manufacturers have been gaining market share, which has increased their purchasing leverage over component suppliers. In calendar year 1999, the top ten desktop personal computer manufacturers accounted for more than 40% of all shipments and a significant amount of the growth in the

7

      Computer manufacturers typically seek to qualify up to three or four providers for each generation of hard drives. Once a computer manufacturer has chosen its qualified hard drive vendors for a given product, it generally will purchase hard drives from those vendors for the life of that product. To achieve consistent success with computer manufacturers’ qualifications, a hard drive supplier must be an early provider of next generation hard drives featuring leading technology and high capacity per disk. Suppliers must quickly achieve volume production of high quality and reliable hard drives. To quickly achieve high volume production, a hard drive supplier must have access to flexible, high-capacity, high-quality manufacturing capabilities. Factors on which computer manufacturers evaluate their hard drive suppliers include overall quality, storage capacities, performance characteristics, price, ease of doing business, and the supplier’s long-term financial stability.

      The business models of computer manufacturers are in the process of changing, and these changes have impacted and will continue to impact Western Digital’s sales, inventory and distribution patterns. The forecast-driven, long-production-run logistics model, which most of the computer industry has used, exposes manufacturers and others in the distribution chain to the risk of carrying excess or obsolete inventories. The historical model limits the computer manufacturers’ flexibility to react to rapid technology changes and component pricing fluctuations. In response, the leading manufacturers require their hard drive suppliers to maintain a small base stock of finished product in locations adjacent to the customers’ manufacturing facilities. In addition, some of the Company’s customers have implemented a supply chain logistics model that combines “build-to-order” (computer manufacturer does not build until there is an order backlog) and “contract manufacturing” (computer manufacturer contracts assembly work to a contract manufacturer who purchases components and assembles the computer based on the computer manufacturer’s instructions.) The Company then ships hard drives directly to the assembler for installation at its location. The Company has adapted its logistics model to effectively align with these industry shifts. These changes require greater skill in managing finished goods inventory and more flexibility in manufacturing, both of which in turn require even closer relationships between the Company and its computer manufacturer and contract manufacturer customers. To meet these challenges the Company is expanding its use of Internet technology and web-based supply chain planning tools. In June 2000, the Company invested as a founder in a start-up company, eHitex, Inc., formed by major suppliers and purchasers of components for personal computer manufacturing to operate an Internet marketplace for such components. For an additional discussion of the changes in customer models, refer to Part II, Item 7, under the headings “Risk factors related to Western Digital particularly,” and “Risk factors related to the hard drive industry in which we operate.”

      The Company maintains a base stock of two to three weeks of current, finished goods inventory for certain key computer manufacturer customers in facilities located adjacent to their operations. Inventory at these locations usually includes minor product customizations (such as labeling) for the related computer manufacturer. If subsequent to its initial order the computer manufacturer changes its requirements, inventory held at these facilities can be sold to other computer manufacturers or distributors as is or with minor modifications (such as a change in labeling) at little or no additional cost. Therefore, these arrangements, even if not fulfilled, have minimal impact on inventory valuation.

      Distributors. The Company uses a select group of distributors to sell its products to small computer manufacturers, value-added resellers, resellers and systems integrators. The Company’s major distributor customers include ASI, CHS, Decision Support Systems, ELD, Ingram Micro, Merisel, Servex, Synnex and Tech Data. Distributors and retailers combined accounted for approximately 31%, 30%, and 35% of disk drive revenue for 1998, 1999, and 2000, respectively. Distributors generally enter into non-exclusive agreements with the Company for purchase and redistribution of product on a quick turnover basis. Purchase orders are placed and revised on a weekly basis.

      Retailers. The Company sells its retail-packaged products directly to a select group of major retailers such as computer superstores, warehouse clubs and computer electronics stores and authorizes sales through distributors to smaller retailers. Major retailers to whom the Company sells directly include Best Buy, Carrefour, Circuit City, CompUSA, Dixons, Office Depot and Vobis. Retailers accounted for approximately

8

      The Company maintains sales offices throughout North America, Eastern and Western Europe, the Middle East, Japan and Southeast Asia. Field application engineering is provided to strategic computer manufacturer accounts, and end-user technical support services are provided within the United States and Europe. The Company’s end-user technical support is supplied by both employees and qualified third-party support organizations through telephone support during business hours and via the Company’s web site.

      The Company’s international sales, which include sales to foreign subsidiaries of U.S. companies, represented 43%, 45%, and 53% of revenues for fiscal years 1998, 1999 and 2000, respectively. Sales to international customers may be subject to certain risks not normally encountered in domestic operations, including exposure to tariffs, various trade regulations and fluctuations in currency exchange rates. See Part II, Item 7, under the heading “Risk factors relating to Western Digital particularly.”

      For information concerning revenue recognition, sales by geographic region and significant customer information, see Notes 1 and 7, respectively, of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

      The Company’s marketing and advertising functions are performed both internally and through outside firms. Advertising, direct marketing, worldwide packaging and marketing materials are targeted to various end-user segments. Western Digital utilizes both consumer media and trade publications. The Company has programs under which qualifying manufacturers and resellers are reimbursed for certain advertising expenditures. Western Digital also invests in direct marketing and customer satisfaction programs. The Company maintains ongoing contact with end users through primary and secondary market research, focus groups, product registrations and technical support databases.

Competition

      In the desktop product market, the Company competes primarily with Fujitsu, IBM, Maxtor, Quantum, Samsung and Seagate.

      The hard drive industry is intensely competitive, with hard drive suppliers competing for a limited number of major customers. Hard drives manufactured by different competitors are highly substitutable due to the industry mandate of technical form, fit and function standards. Hard drive manufacturers compete on the basis of product quality and reliability, storage capacity, unit price, product performance, production volume capabilities, delivery capability, leadership in time-to-market, time-to-volume and time-to-quality and ease of doing business. The relative importance of these factors varies among different customer and market segments. The Company believes that it is generally competitive in all of these factors.

      The Company believes that it cannot differentiate its hard drive products solely on attributes such as storage capacity; therefore, the Company also differentiates itself by designing and incorporating into its hard drives desirable product performance attributes and by emphasizing rapid response with its computer manufacturer and distribution customers and brand equity with its end users. These product performance attributes include seek time, data transfer rates, intelligent caching, failure prediction, remote diagnostics, acoustics and data recovery. Rapid response requires accelerated design cycles, customer delivery and production flexibility, which contribute to customer satisfaction. Data storage has become strategically critical for computer end users. Consequently, the Company believes that trust in a manufacturer’s reputation has become an important factor in the selection of a hard drive, particularly within such a rapidly changing technology environment. The Company believes it has strong brand equity with its end users.

      The Company’s market share eroded in 1998, primarily due to competitive conditions in the hard drive industry (with resulting cutbacks in production), the timing of the Company’s transition from thin film to

9

      The desktop hard drive market is characterized by more competitors and shorter product life cycles than the enterprise hard drive market; therefore, it has traditionally been subject to periods of sustained and severe price competition, and factors such as time-to-market can have a more pronounced effect on the success of any particular product.

      In the network attached storage market, Connex competes primarily with established server companies like Compaq and Dell and with network attached storage makers Hewlett Packard and ProComm. The Company expects that the products under development by Connex will face significant competition from established manufacturers of servers and of network attached storage devices. For an additional discussion of the challenges facing Connex, see Part II, Item 7, under the heading “Risk factors related to Western Digital particularly.”

      Advances in magnetic, optical or other data storage technologies could result in competitive products that have better performance or lower cost per unit of capacity than the Company’s hard drive products. High-speed semiconductor memory could compete with the Company’s hard drive products in the future. Semiconductor memory is much faster than magnetic disk drives, but currently is volatile (i.e., subject to loss of data in the event of power failure) and much more costly. Flash memory, a nonvolatile semiconductor memory, is currently much more costly and, while it has higher “read” performance than hard drives, it has lower “write” performance. Flash memory could become competitive in the near future for applications requiring less storage capacity than hard drives can provide.

      For an additional discussion of competition, see Part II, Item 7, under the heading “Risk factors related to the hard drive industry in which we operate.”

Service and Warranty

      Western Digital generally warrants its newly manufactured hard drives against defects in materials and workmanship for a period of one to three years from the date of sale. The Company’s warranty obligation is generally limited to repair or replacement of the hard drive. The Company has contracted with a third party in the United States to process and test returned hard drives for the Company’s end users. The Company refurbishes or repairs its products at a third-party service facility located in Singapore and at a third-party service facility located in Germany.

Manufacturing

      To be competitive, Western Digital must manufacture high quality hard drives with industry leading time-to-volume production at competitive unit cost. The Company strives to maintain manufacturing flexibility, rapidly achieve high manufacturing yields and acquire high-quality components in required volumes at competitive prices. The critical elements of Western Digital’s hard drive production are high volume, low cost assembly and testing, and establishment and maintenance of key vendor relationships in order to create “virtual vertical integration.” By establishing partner relationships with its strategic component suppliers, the Company believes it is able to access “best-of-class” manufacturing quality without the substantial capital investment associated with actual vertical integration. In addition, the Company believes that its virtual vertical integration model enables it to have the business flexibility needed to select the highest quality low cost suppliers as product designs and technologies evolve.

      Hard drive manufacturing is a complex process involving the assembly of precision components with narrow tolerances and extensive testing to ensure reliability. The assembly process occurs in a “clean room” environment which demands skill in process engineering and efficient utilization of the “clean room” layout in

10

      The Company produces hard drives in one plant in Malaysia. As a continuation of its virtual vertical integration model, the Company sold its media manufacturing division in 1999 to Komag, Inc. (“Komag”). With the sale of this division, the Company now purchases all of the standard mechanical components and micro controllers for its hard drives from external suppliers.

      The Company continually evaluates its manufacturing processes in an effort to increase productivity and decrease manufacturing costs. In order to address inventory oversupply, the Company has reduced excess manufacturing capacity by closing two manufacturing facilities in Singapore and relocating desktop hard drive production to Malaysia. The Company continually evaluates which steps in the manufacturing process would benefit from automation and how automated manufacturing processes support the Company’s business plans.

      For an additional discussion of manufacturing, see Part II, Item 7, under the heading “Risk factors relating to Western Digital particularly.”

Research and Development

      The Company devotes substantial resources to development of new products and improvement of existing products. The Company focuses its engineering efforts on coordinating its product design and manufacturing processes in order to bring its products to market in a cost-effective and timely manner. Research and development expenses totaled $203.7, $217.0, and $163.2 million in 1998, 1999 and 2000, respectively. Research and development expenditures included approximately $22.0 million, primarily related to the initiation of the IBM relationship in 1998, and approximately $12.0 million related to the acquisition of Connex in 1999.

      For a discussion of product development, see Part II, Item 7, under the heading “Risk factors related to the hard drive industry in which we operate.”

Materials and Supplies

      The principal components currently used in the manufacture of the Company’s hard drives are magnetic heads and related head stack assemblies, media, controllers, spindle motors and mechanical parts used in the head-disk assembly. In addition to its own proprietary semiconductor devices, the Company also uses standard semiconductor components such as logic, memory and microprocessor devices obtained from other manufacturers and a wide variety of other parts, including connectors, cables, and other interconnect technology.

      Unlike some of its competitors, the Company acquires all of the components for its products from third-party suppliers. In general, the Company tries to have at least two or three suppliers for each of its component requirements. For example, the Company currently buys giant magnetoresistive heads from IBM, Read-Rite and SAE. Media requirements are purchased from several outside vendors including Komag, IBM and HMT Technology. Komag and HMT Technology have publicly announced a plan to merge. In connection with the sale of its media manufacturing division to Komag in April 1999, the Company entered into a three-year volume purchase agreement with Komag. Under this Agreement, the Company is obligated to purchase a substantial portion of its requirements for hard disk media from Komag. The Agreement does not require the Company to purchase a fixed minimum amount of media from Komag.

      Some custom integrated circuits are currently sole-sourced from Cirrus Logic and STMicroelectronics. Because of their custom nature, these products require significant design-in periods and long lead times. There has been a trend in integrated circuit design toward increased integration of various separate circuits. The Company expects this trend to continue in the area of custom integrated circuits for hard drives.

      For an additional discussion of component supplies, see Part II, Item 7, under the heading “Risk factors relating to Western Digital particularly.”

11

Backlog

      At September 18, 2000, the Company’s backlog, consisting of orders scheduled for delivery within the next twelve months, was approximately $294 million, compared with a backlog at August 21, 1999 of approximately $388 million. The Company expects all this backlog to be delivered within the current fiscal year. Historically, a substantial portion of the Company’s orders has been for shipments within 30 to 60 days of the placement of the order. The Company generally negotiates pricing, order lead times, product support requirements and other terms and conditions prior to receiving a computer manufacturer’s first purchase order for a product. Manufacturers’ purchase orders typically may be canceled with relatively short notice to the Company, with little or no cost to the customer, or modified by customers to provide for delivery at a later date. Also, certain of the Company’s sales to computer manufacturers are made under “just-in-time” delivery contracts that do not generally require firm order commitments by the customer until the time of sale. Therefore, backlog information as of the end of a particular period is not necessarily indicative of future levels of the Company’s revenue and profit and may not be comparable to earlier periods.

Patents, Licenses and Proprietary Information

      The Company owns numerous patents and has many patent applications in process. The Company believes that, although its patents and patent applications have significant value, the successful manufacturing and marketing of its products depends primarily upon the technical competence and creative ability of its personnel. Accordingly, the patents held and applied for do not assure the Company’s future success.

      In addition to patent protection of certain intellectual property rights, the Company considers elements of its product designs and processes to be proprietary and confidential. The Company believes that its nonpatented intellectual property, particularly some of its process technology, is an important factor in its success. Western Digital relies upon employee, consultant, and vendor non-disclosure agreements and a system of internal safeguards to protect its proprietary information. Despite these safeguards, there is a risk that competitors may obtain and use such information. The laws of foreign jurisdictions in which the Company does business also may provide less protection for confidential information than the United States.

      The Company relies on certain technology that is licensed from other parties in order to manufacture and sell its products. The Company has cross-licensing agreements with several competitors, customers and suppliers, and the Company believes that it has adequate licenses and other agreements in place in addition to its own intellectual property portfolio to compete successfully in the hard drive industry.

      For additional discussion of intellectual property, see Part II, Item 7, under the heading “Risk factors relating to Western Digital particularly.”

Environmental Regulation

      The Company is subject to a variety of regulations in connection with its operations. It believes that it has obtained or is in the process of obtaining all necessary permits for its domestic operations.

Employees

      As of June 30, 2000, the Company employed a total of 7,321 full-time employees worldwide. This represents a reduction in headcount of approximately 30% since July 3, 1999, as the Company responded to the industry downturn and its decrease in sales by restructuring and exiting the enterprise hard drive market. The Company employed 1,090 employees in the United States, 6,040 employees in Malaysia, 85 in Singapore, and 106 at its international sales offices as of such date.

      Many of the Company’s employees are highly skilled, and the Company’s continued success depends in part upon its ability to attract and retain such employees. Accordingly, the Company offers employee benefit programs which it believes are at least equivalent to those offered by its competitors. Despite these programs, the Company has, along with most of its competitors, experienced difficulty at times in hiring and retaining certain skilled personnel. In critical areas, the Company has utilized consultants and contract personnel to fill these needs until full-time employees could be recruited. The Company has never experienced a work

12

Item 2.  Properties

      The Company’s worldwide headquarters, located on leased property in Irvine, California, house management, research and development, administrative and sales personnel. The Company has extended the current lease of this facility through January 2001. During the fourth quarter of 2000, the Company signed a new 10-year lease agreement and plans to relocate its worldwide headquarters to a facility in Lake Forest, California, commencing in November 2000. The Company leases facilities in San Jose, California and Irvine, California, for research and development activities. The San Jose leases expire at various times beginning in December 2002 through July 2006. The Irvine research and development facility lease expires in September 2010. Western Digital owns a manufacturing facility in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. During 2000 the Company sold approximately 34 acres of land in Irvine, California, upon which it had previously planned to build a new corporate headquarters, for $26 million (the approximate cost of the land). The Company also sold its enterprise drive manufacturing facility in Tuas, Singapore for $11.0 million (for a gain of $3.1 million) and its Rochester, Minnesota enterprise research and development facility for $29.7 million (for a loss of $1.9 million).

      The Company also leases office space in various other locations throughout the world primarily for sales and technical support. The Company’s present facilities are adequate for its current needs, although the process of upgrading its facilities to meet technological and market requirements is expected to continue. The hard drive industry does not generally require long lead time to develop and begin operations in new manufacturing facilities.

Item 3.  Legal Proceedings

      The following discussion contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. These statements relate to the Company’s legal proceedings described below. Litigation is inherently uncertain and may result in adverse rulings or decisions. Additionally, the Company may enter into settlements or be subject to judgments that may, individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity. In addition, the costs of defending such litigation, individually or in the aggregate, may be material, regardless of the outcome. Accordingly, actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements.

      In 1992 Amstrad plc (“Amstrad”) brought suit against the Company in California State Superior Court, County of Orange, alleging that disk drives supplied to Amstrad by the Company in 1988 and 1989 were defective and caused damages to Amstrad of not less than $186 million. The suit also sought punitive damages. The Company denied the material allegations of the complaint and filed cross-claims against Amstrad. The case was tried, and in June 1999 the jury returned a verdict in favor of Western Digital. Amstrad has appealed the judgment and the Company has filed motions to recover a portion of its legal and other costs of defense. The Company does not believe that the outcome of this matter will have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position, results of operation or liquidity.

      In 1994 Papst Licensing (“Papst”) brought suit against the Company in federal court in California alleging infringement by the Company of five of its patents relating to disk drive motors that the Company purchased from motor vendors. Later that year Papst dismissed its case without prejudice, but it has notified the Company that it intends to reinstate the suit if the Company does not enter into a license agreement with Papst. Papst has also put the Company on notice with respect to several additional patents. The Company does not believe that the outcome of this matter will have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position, results of operation or liquidity.

      On October 23, 1998, Censtor Corporation (“Censtor”) initiated an arbitration proceeding against the Company in California, alleging that it is owed royalties under a license agreement between Censtor and the Company. In response, the Company filed a complaint in federal court in California seeking a determination that the patents at issue are invalid. The federal court action has been stayed pending completion of the

13

      On June 9, 2000 a suit was brought against the Company in California State Superior Court on behalf of a class of former employees of the Company who were terminated as a result of a reduction in force in December 1999. The complaint asserts claims for unpaid wages, fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of contract, and unfair business practices. The Company has removed the suit to federal court in California on the ground that all of the claims are preempted by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. The Company denies the material allegations of the complaint and intends to vigorously defend this action. The Company does not believe that the outcome of this matter will have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position, results of operation or liquidity.

      In the normal course of business, the Company receives and makes inquiries regarding possible intellectual property matters, including alleged patent infringement. Where deemed advisable, the Company may seek or extend licenses or negotiate settlements. Although patent holders often offer such licenses, no assurance can be given that in a particular case a license will be offered or that the offered terms will be acceptable to the Company. One such matter currently pending involves Discovision Associates, which has recently brought patents it holds to the Company’s attention. The Company does not believe that the ultimate resolution of these matters will have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

      From time to time the Company receives claims and is a party to suits and other judicial and administrative proceedings incidental to its business. Although occasional adverse decisions (or settlements) may occur, the Company does not believe that the ultimate resolution of these matters will have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

Item 4.  Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

      No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of 2000.

Executive Officers of the Registrant

      The names, ages and positions of all the executive officers of the Company as of September 15, 2000 are listed below, followed by a brief account of their business experience during the past five years. Executive officers are normally appointed annually by the Board of Directors at a meeting of the directors immediately following the Annual Meeting of Shareholders. There are no family relationships among these officers nor any arrangements or understandings between any officer and any other person pursuant to which an officer was selected.

14

      Messrs. Massengill, Frank, Campbell, Cornelius and Slavin have been employed by the Company for more than five years and have served in various executive capacities with the Company before being appointed to their present positions.

      Mr. Shakeel joined the Company in 1985 as Product Manager, Integrated Drive Electronics. Mr. Shakeel served in various executive capacities, including Vice President, Materials — Asia, until October 1997, when he left the Company to become Managing Director of Mahlin Associates, a supplier of electromechanical components in Singapore. Mr. Shakeel rejoined the Company in April 1999 as Senior Vice President of Operations, Drive Products Division. He became Senior Vice President of Worldwide Operations in July 1999. He was promoted to his current position in February 2000.

      Ms. Hopp joined the Company in 1998 as Vice President, Finance. Prior to joining the Company, she was an audit partner at Ernst & Young, her employer for 17 years. She was promoted to her current position in December 1999.

      Mr. Michael Williams joined the Company in September 1998 as General Manager, Enterprise Storage Group. He assumed his current position in February 1999. Prior to joining the Company, he was a founder and served as Vice President, Engineering, of Ridge Technologies, a manufacturer of enterprise-class storage systems and subsidiary of Adaptec, from July 1997. Ridge Technologies was the predecessor to Connex, Inc. Prior to this, Mr. Williams served in various engineering and management positions at Apple Computer for 10 years.

      Mr. Fetah joined the Company in March 2000 as Vice President of Human Resources. Prior to joining the Company, he served as Executive Director, Human Resources, for PeopleSoft, Inc. Prior to joining PeopleSoft in 1996, he was Manager, Human Resources, for Fluor Corporation where he served for 5 years.

PART II

Item 5.  Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters

      Western Digital’s common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the symbol “WDC.” The approximate number of holders of record of common stock of the Company as of September 25, 2000 was 3,902.

      The Company has not paid any cash dividends on its common stock and does not intend to pay any cash dividends on common stock in the foreseeable future.

      The high and low sales prices of the Company’s common stock, as reported by the NYSE, for each quarter of 1999 and 2000 are as follows:

15

Item 6.  Selected Financial Data

Financial Highlights

      No cash dividends were paid for the years presented.

Item 7.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward-Looking Statements

      This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws. The statements that are not purely historical should be considered forward-looking statements. Often they can be identified by the use of forward-looking words, such as “may,” “will,” “could,” “project,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “estimate,” “continue,” “potential,” “plan,” “forecasts,” and the like. Statements concerning current conditions may also be forward-looking if they imply a continuation of current conditions. These statements appear in a number of places in this report and include statements regarding the intentions, plans, strategies, beliefs or current expectations of the Company with respect to, among other things:

	•	the financial prospects of the Company;
	•	the Company’s financing plans;
	•	litigation and other contingencies potentially affecting the Company’s financial position, operating results or liquidity;
	•	trends affecting the Company’s financial condition or operating results;
	•	the Company’s strategies for growth, operations, product development and commercialization; and
	•	conditions or trends in or factors affecting the computer, data storage, home entertainment or hard drive industry.

      Forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements. Readers are urged to carefully review the disclosures made by the Company concerning risks and other factors that may affect the Company’s business and operating results, including those made under the captions “Risk factors related to the hard drive industry in which we operate” and “Risk factors relating to Western Digital particularly”, in this report, as well as the Company’s other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. The Company undertakes no obligation to publish revised forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

16

Overview

      Western Digital is a longtime leader in the data storage industry and is leveraging its core strengths to extend its data storage product offerings and expand beyond the traditional market for hard drives into new markets which meet certain predefined criteria. The Company considers new or high growth markets for data or content storage, management, and communication which have few entrenched competitors and offer the prospect of a sustained competitive advantage through unique or proprietary technology.

      The hard drive industry, the Company’s primary business, is intensely competitive and has experienced a great deal of growth, entry and exit of firms, and technological change over the past several years. This industry is characterized by short product life cycles, dependence upon highly skilled engineering and other personnel, significant expenditures for product development and recurring periods of oversupply. As a result of operating losses incurred in 1998, the Company initiated restructuring programs for its hard drive operations in 1999 and 2000 to reduce costs and improve operating efficiency. During 1999, the Company combined its Personal Storage Division and Enterprise Storage Group into a single hard drive operating unit, closed its Tuas, Singapore facility and moved production of its enterprise drives to the Company’s nearby manufacturing facility in Chai-Chee, Singapore. The combination resulted in a $41.0 million charge to operations in the third quarter of 1999. Also during 1999, the Company sold its Santa Clara disk media operations to Komag, recording a charge to operations of $20.0 million, in the fourth quarter of 1999.

      During 2000, the Company reorganized its operational and management responsibilities, transferred its hard drive production from Singapore to Malaysia and closed its Singapore operations. These actions resulted in a net reduction of worldwide headcount of approximately 1,600 and net charges to operations of $52.6 million. Also in 2000, the Company exited the enterprise hard drive market, shifting its strategic focus and resources in the enterprise storage market to data content management systems and management software for storage systems. In connection with this decision, the Company closed its Rochester, Minnesota enterprise hard drive design center. Approximately 402 employees were terminated and restructuring and other charges totaling $72.9 million were recorded.

      During the first quarter of 2000, the Company announced a recall of its 6.8GB per platter series of WD Caviar® desktop hard drives because of a reliability problem resulting from a faulty power driver chip manufactured by a third-party supplier. As a result, revenues of approximately $100 million were reversed and the Caviar product line was shut down for approximately two weeks, eliminating approximately $70 million of forecasted revenue. In addition, charges totaling $37.7 million for estimated costs to recall and repair the affected drives were recorded to cost of revenues in 2000.

      In February 1999, the Company acquired its Connex subsidiary for approximately $12.0 million. Connex delivers enterprise-class storage functionality for the department and mid-sized business markets, including storage management software, network attached storage and storage area networks. In 2000, the Company formed Sagetree, Inc. (“Sagetree”), to design and market packaged analytical applications and related services for supply chain and product lifecycle intelligence. In addition, the Company is developing products for consumer audio and video applications. Total operating losses for Connex, Sagetree and other developing new ventures amounted to $38.9 million in 2000.

17

Results of Operations

  Summary of 1998, 1999 and 2000 Comparison

      The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, items in the Company’s statements of operations expressed as a percentage of total revenue.

      The Company reported losses before taxes and extraordinary gains of $292.0, $492.7 and $374.4 million in 1998, 1999 and 2000, respectively. The 1998 loss included charges of $140.0 million in cost of revenues for the Company’s transition to magnetoresistive head technology, and $30.0 million in research and development expenses for start up of a technology agreement and terminated engineering programs. The 1999 loss included charges of approximately $77.0 million for incremental thin-film warranty provisions, approximately $7.5 million in Malaysian currency losses, $12.0 million of in-process research and development write-offs associated with the acquisition of Connex and restructuring charges of $61.0 million for the consolidation of the Company’s personal storage and enterprise storage divisions and the sale of its media operation. The 2000 loss included net restructuring charges totaling $85.8 million for the closure of the Company’s Singapore operations and exit from the enterprise hard drive market. The 2000 loss also included charges to cost of revenues of $34.8 million for vendor settlements, incremental warranty, and inventory write-downs associated with the exit from the enterprise market and $37.7 million for costs to repair recalled drives. Excluding the aforementioned restructuring and other charges, losses before taxes and extraordinary gains were $122.0, $335.2 and $216.1 million in 1998, 1999 and 2000, respectively. The increase in losses from 1998 to 1999 resulted from a $774.3 million, or 21.9%, decrease in revenues, a 4.1% decrease in gross margin percentage and a $27.6 million, or 7.5% increase in operating expenses. The decrease in losses from 1999 to 2000 resulted from a 1.4% increase in gross margin percentage on lower revenues ($809.6 million, or a 29.3% decrease over 1999) and a $91.9 million, or 23.4%, decrease in operating expenses. In addition, the 2000 loss included $38.9 million in operating losses for Connex, Sagetree and other early stage ventures compared with $8.2 million in 1999 and $0 in 1998.

  Net Revenue

      Consolidated net revenues in 1999 of $2.8 billion decreased 21.9%, or $0.8 billion, from 1998 as a result of a 5% decrease in unit shipments stemming from the Company’s transition to magnetoresistive head technology, combined with lower average selling prices (ASP’s). Consolidated net revenues of $2.0 billion in 2000, decreased $0.8 billion or 29.3% from 1999, due to the Company’s decision in the third quarter of 2000 to exit the enterprise hard drive market, a decline in the ASP’s of desktop hard drive products due to an intensely

18

  Gross Profit

      Gross profit totaled $100.0 million, or 2.8% of revenue in 1998, negative $2.8 million, or (0.1)% of revenue in 1999 and $8.1 million, or 0.4% of revenue in 2000. Gross profit for 1998 included $140.0 million of special charges to cost of revenues to accelerate the Company’s transition to magnetoresistive head technology. Gross profit for 1999 included $77.0 million of special charges to cost of revenues for incremental thin-film warranty provision related to a higher lifetime return rate being applied to a larger base of products as a result of the transition in desktop product line technology. Gross profit for 2000 includes $72.5 million of special charges to costs of revenues, related directly to the exit from the enterprise hard drive market and the product recall. Excluding special charges, gross profit was $240.0 million, or 6.8% of revenue, $74.2 million, or 2.7% of revenue and $80.6 million, or 4.1% of revenue, for 1998, 1999 and 2000, respectively. The reduction of gross profit margin from 1998 to 1999 (excluding special charges) was primarily due to continued competitive pricing pressure in the desktop hard drive market and lower sales of higher margin enterprise hard drive products. The increase in the gross profit margin from 1999 to 2000 (excluding special charges) was primarily the result of lower manufacturing costs due to the consolidation of desktop hard drive production to a single, highly utilized facility in Malaysia, offset by lower volumes and lower ASPs.

  Operating Expenses

      Research and development expense was $217.0 million in 1999, an increase of $13.3 million from 1998. The increase was primarily due to the third quarter $12.0 million charge for in-process research and development related to the acquisition of Connex. Research and development expense for 2000 was $163.2 million, a decrease of $53.8 million from 1999. The decrease was primarily due to the Company’s exit from the enterprise hard drive market and expense reduction efforts, partially offset by increased spending at Connex, Sagetree, and other new ventures.

      Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expense was $196.0 million in 1999, an increase of $3.8 million from 1998. The increase was primarily the result of a $7.5 million charge on terminated Malaysian Ringgit hedging contracts recorded in 1999, partially offset by decreased marketing expenditures. SG&A expense in 2000 was $138.3 million, a decrease of $57.6 million from 1999. The decrease in SG&A expense was primarily due to the Company’s exit from the enterprise hard drive market, expense reductions in its desktop hard drive business, a $11.0 million accrual reduction in the fourth quarter of 2000 and the nonrecurrence of a $7.5 million charge on the terminated hedging contracts recorded in 1999. The decrease was partially offset by increased spending at Connex, Sagetree and other of the Company’s developing ventures in 2000.

  Interest and Other Income/ Expense, Extraordinary Item and Tax Benefit

      Net interest and other income (expense) was $3.8 million, ($15.9) million and $4.9 million in 1998, 1999 and 2000, respectively. The change from 1998 to 1999 was primarily due to a full year’s accrual of original issue discount on the Company’s convertible debentures and a full year of interest expense incurred on a $50.0 million term loan. The increase in net interest and other income in 2000 was due to a $14.8 million gain on disposition of certain investment securities and lower interest expense due to lower average debt balances resulting from the payment in 2000 of an outstanding term loan of $50.0 million and redemption of convertible bonds, offset by a reduced amount of interest income due to lower cash and cash equivalent balances.

      During 2000, the Company recognized extraordinary gains of $166.9 million upon retirement of convertible debentures. The Company issued 26.7 million shares of common stock in exchange for $735.6 million in face value of its convertible debentures (with a book value of $284.1 million) which were retired in non-cash transactions. These redemptions were private, individually negotiated transactions with certain institutional investors.

19

      The Company recorded an income tax benefit of $1.8 million in 1998 for the expected benefit of loss carrybacks, partially offset by provisions for income taxes recorded in certain jurisdictions where the Company had positive earnings, and an income tax benefit of $19.5 million in 2000 for adjustment of its current tax accruals and certain deferred tax amounts. These accruals were previously established over time and primarily relate to unremitted income of foreign subsidiaries. However, due to the significant increase of net operating loss carryforwards in recent years and reevaluation of the accruals after the substantial international restructurings in 2000, the Company believes these accruals are no longer necessary. In 1999, no tax benefit was recorded because additional loss carrybacks were not available and management believed it was “more likely than not” that the deferred tax benefits generated would not be realized (see Note 5 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements).

Liquidity and Capital Resources

      The Company had cash and cash equivalents of $226.1 million at July 3, 1999 and $184.0 million at June 30, 2000. Net cash used in operations was $139.5 million during 1999 as compared to $152.0 million during 2000. Excluding cash used for restructuring and product recall activities, cash used for operations was $122.8 million during 1999 as compared to $104.5 million during 2000. Cash used for restructuring activities during 1999 was $16.7 million and consisted of expenditures for severance and outplacement and facility renovation costs. Cash used for restructuring and other nonrecurring activities was $47.5 million during 2000 and consisted of expenditures for severance and outplacement, lease cancellations and product recall costs.

      The Company’s cash conversion cycle decreased 12 days in 1999 and another 17 days in 2000. The conversion cycles consist of the following: days of sales outstanding (“DSO”) of 44 in 1999 and 28 in 2000; days of payables outstanding (“DPO”) of 50 in 1999 and 52 in 2000; and days of inventory on hand of 22 in 1999 and 23 in 2000. Despite this improvement, the cash flows provided by changes in working capital accounts decreased from $147.3 million in 1999 to $67.5 million in 2000 due to an approximate 30% decrease in 2000 revenues and corresponding cost of revenues as compared to 1999, and the utilization in 2000 of significant accruals recorded in 1999 and 2000 for thin-film warranty, restructuring and other charges.

      Other uses of cash during 2000 included the repayment of bank debt of $50.0 million, strategic cost-method investments of $12.9 million and net capital expenditures of $22.0 million. Other sources of cash during 2000 included proceeds of $111.8 million received upon issuance of 24.6 million shares of the Company’s stock under the Company’s equity facility, $10.0 million received by Sagetree upon issuance of preferred stock, $6.2 million received in connection with stock option exercises and Employee Stock Purchase Plan purchases, and $66.8 million received from sales of real property.

      Capital expenditures in 1999 amounted to $106.6 million to upgrade and expand the Company’s production capability, replace existing assets, and further develop the Company’s information systems. The Company received $15.3 million in connection with stock option exercises and Employee Stock Purchase Plan purchases in 1999.

      The Company anticipates that capital expenditures in 2001 will not be more than $50.0 million and will relate to accommodating new product lines, normal replacement of existing assets and expansion of production capabilities in Malaysia. The Company also anticipates cash expenditures of not more than $20.0 million to be paid in the first half of 2001 related to restructuring and special charges accrued during 2000, primarily for settlements with vendors on existing purchase orders related to the Company’s exit from the enterprise hard drive market.

      In February 1998, the Company received gross proceeds of $460.1 million (before the Initial Purchasers’ discount) from an offering of zero coupon convertible subordinated debentures due February 18, 2018 (the “Debentures”). The Debentures are subordinated to all senior debt; are redeemable at the option of the Company any time after February 18, 2003 at the issue price plus accrued original issue discount to the date of redemption; and at the holder’s option, will be repurchased by the Company, as of February 18, 2003, February 18, 2008 or February 18, 2013, or if there is a Fundamental Change (as defined in the Debenture documents), at the issue price plus accrued original issue discount to the date of repurchase. (The repurchase

20

      Subsequent to June 30, 2000, the Company entered into a new three-year Senior Credit Facility for its hard drive solutions division (“HDS”), replacing a previous facility that had matured on March 31, 2000. The new Senior Credit Facility provides up to $125 million in revolving credit (subject to a borrowing base calculation), is secured by HDS’s accounts receivable, inventory, 65% of the stock in its foreign subsidiaries and other assets. At the option of HDS, borrowings bear interest at either LIBOR (with option periods of one to three months) or a base rate, plus a margin determined by the borrowing base. The Senior Credit Facility requires HDS to maintain certain amounts of tangible net worth, prohibits the payment of cash dividends on common stock and contains a number of other covenants. As of the date hereof, the Company was in compliance with these covenants and there were no borrowings under the Facility.

      Under an existing shelf registration statement (the “equity facility”), the Company may issue shares of common stock to institutional investors for cash. The equity facility provides for up to $190.0 million in cash proceeds of which $111.8 million had been utilized as of June 30, 2000. Shares sold under the facility are at the market price of the Company’s common stock less a discount ranging from 2.75% to 4.25%. Between July 1, 2000 and September 5, 2000, the Company issued 6.1 million shares for cash proceeds of $27.6 million. As of September 21, 2000, $139.4 million of the equity facility had been utilized.

      The Company had a shareholders’ deficiency of $109.8 million as of June 30, 2000 and expects to continue to incur operating losses in 2001. However, at June 30, 2000, the Company had cash and cash equivalent balances of $184.0 million and working capital of $6.3 million. The Company has achieved significant reductions in manufacturing labor and overhead, capital expenditures and operating expenses resulting from the sale in late 1999 of the Company’s media operations, the closure in 2000 of the Company’s two Singapore based manufacturing facilities and its enterprise design center and the reduction in worldwide headcount from 10,503 at July 3, 1999 to 7,321 at June 30, 2000. In addition, the Company had the following additional sources of liquidity available:

	•	As of September 21, 2000, $50.6 million remaining available under the equity facility;
	•	As of September 21, 2000, a Senior Credit Facility providing up to $125 million in revolving credit (subject to a borrowing base calculation); and
	•	Other equity investments that may be disposed of during the next twelve months, including 6.5 million shares of Komag common stock (of which 4.9  million shares were sold during September 2000 for net proceeds of $15.0 million) and 1.3 million shares of Vixel common stock. The combined market value of the remaining 1.6 million Komag shares which can be sold in the next twelve months and the 1.3 million shares of Vixel common stock is approximately $15.4 million as of September 21, 2000 (an additional 3.2 million shares of Komag common stock will become available for disposition in October 2001).

      Based on the above factors, the Company believes its current cash and cash equivalent balances, its existing equity and credit facilities, and other liquidity sources currently available to it, will be sufficient to meet its working capital needs through 2001. There can be no assurance that the Senior Credit Facility or the equity facility will continue to be available to the Company. Also, the Company’s ability to sustain its working

21

New Accounting Pronouncements

      In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“SFAS 133”). SFAS 133 was effective for all fiscal quarters for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 1999. In August 1999, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 137, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities — Deferral of the Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 133, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133” (“SFAS 137”), which defers the effective date of SFAS 133 to all fiscal quarters for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2000. In June 2000, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 138, “Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities, an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133”. SFAS 133, as amended, establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments embedded in other contracts and for hedging activities. The application of these statements is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity, and the Company does not anticipate recording a significant adjustment as a result of the transition to these statements.

      In December 1999, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) issued Staff Accounting Bulletin 101 (“SAB101”) “Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements”. This Staff Accounting Bulletin summarizes certain of the staff’s views in applying generally accepted accounting principles to revenue recognition in financial statements. The Company will be required to follow the guidance in SAB101 no later than its fourth quarter of 2001, with restatement of earlier quarters in 2001 required, if necessary. The SEC has recently indicated it intends to issue further guidance with respect to adoption of specific issues addressed by SAB101. Until such time as this additional guidance is issued, the Company is unable to assess the impact, if any, SAB101 may have on its consolidated financial position or results of operations.

      In March 2000, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 44 “Accounting for Certain Transactions Involving Stock Compensation — an interpretation of APB Opinion No. 25” (“FIN 44”). This Interpretation clarifies the definition of an employee for purposes of applying Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” (“APB 25”), the criteria for determining whether a plan qualifies as a noncompensatory plan, the accounting consequence of various modifications to the terms of a previously fixed stock option or award, and the accounting for an exchange of stock compensation awards in a business combination. This Interpretation is effective July 1, 2000, but certain conclusions in this Interpretation cover specific events that occur after either December 15, 1998 or January 12, 2000. The adoption of FIN 44 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

Year 2000

      On January 1, 2000, the Company incurred nominal impact on its products, equipment, computer systems and applications as a result of the Year 2000 issue. The Company attributes this to its Year 2000 readiness efforts. As of December 31, 1999, systems remediation and integration testing and development of the Company’s contingency plans had been completed. Supplier management is an ongoing process, and no material impact was felt from lack of supplier readiness at January 1, 2000. Although the Company did not experience any material problems related to the Year 2000 issue, there can be no assurances that problems relating to the Year 2000 issue will not manifest themselves in the future. Expenditures related to the Year 2000 project, excluding normal replacement of existing capital assets, totaled approximately $12.2 million.

22

Risk factors related to the hard drive industry in which we operate

      To achieve consistent success with computer manufacturer customers we must be an early provider of next generation hard drives featuring leading technology and high quality. If we fail to:

	•	consistently maintain or improve our time-to-market performance with our new products
	•	produce these products in sufficient volume within our rapid product cycle
	•	qualify these products with key customers on a timely basis by meeting our customers’ performance and quality specifications, or
	•	achieve acceptable manufacturing yields and costs with these products

then our market share would be adversely affected, which would harm our operating results.

      Over the past few years hard drive areal density (the gigabytes of storage per disk) has increased at a much more rapid pace than previously, and we expect this trend to continue. Higher areal densities mean that fewer heads and disks are required to achieve a given drive capacity. This has significantly shortened product life cycles, since each generation of drives is more cost effective than the previous one. Shorter product cycles make it more difficult to recover the cost of product development.

      Due to short product life cycles, we must regularly engage in new product qualification with our customers. To be considered for qualification we must be among the leaders in time-to-market with our new products. Once a product is accepted for qualification testing, any failure or delay in the qualification process can result in our losing sales to that customer until the next generation of products is introduced. The effect of missing a product qualification opportunity is magnified by the limited number of high volume computer manufacturers, most of which continue to consolidate their share of the PC market. These risks are magnified because we expect cost improvements and competitive pressures to result in declining sales and gross margins on our current generation products.

  Our average selling prices are declining.

      We expect that our average selling prices for hard disk drives will continue to decline. Rapid increases in areal density mean that the average drive we sell has fewer heads and disks, and is therefore lower cost. Because of the competitiveness of the hard drive industry, lower costs generally mean lower prices. This is true even for those products that are competitive and introduced into the market in a timely manner. Our average selling prices decline even further when competitors lower prices to absorb excess capacity, liquidate excess inventories, restructure or attempt to gain market share.

      If one of our competitors were able to implement a significant advance in head or disk drive technology that enables a step-change increase in areal density allowing greater storage of data on a disk, it would harm our operating results.

      Advances in magnetic, optical, semiconductor or other data storage technologies could result in competitive products that have better performance or lower cost per unit of capacity than our products. If these products prove to be superior in performance or cost per unit of capacity, we could be at a competitive disadvantage to the companies offering those products.

23

      The price of hard drives has fallen over time due to increases in supply, cost reductions, technological advances and price reductions by competitors seeking to liquidate excess inventories or gain market share. In addition, rapid technological changes often reduce the volume and profitability of sales of existing products and increase the risk of inventory obsolescence. These factors, taken together, result in significant and rapid shifts in market share among the industry’s major participants. For example, during 1998 and 1999, we lost significant share of the desktop market. During the first quarter of 2000, the Company lost market share as a result of a previously announced product recall; however, we recovered some market share during the remainder of 2000, but our share is still significantly below its 1997 level.

      Demand for our hard drives depends on the demand for computer systems manufactured by our customers and on storage upgrades to existing systems. The demand for computer systems has been volatile in the past and often has had an exaggerated effect on the demand for hard drives in any given period. As a result, the hard drive market tends to experience periods of excess capacity which typically lead to intense price competition. If intense price competition occurs, we may be forced to lower prices sooner and more than expected and transition to new products sooner than expected.

      Over the past few years the consumer market for desktop computers has shifted significantly towards lower priced systems, especially those systems priced below $1,000. We were late to market with a value line hard drive to serve that market, and we lost market share. If we are not able to offer a competitively priced value line hard drive for the low-cost PC market our market share will likely fall, which could harm our operating results.

      The PC market is fragmenting into a variety of computing devices and products. Some of these products, such as Internet appliances, may not contain a hard drive. On the other hand, many industry analysts expect, as do we, that as broadcasting and communications are increasingly converted to digital technology from the older, analog technology, the technology of computers and consumer electronics and communication devices will converge, and hard drives will be found in many consumer products other than computers. If we are not successful in using our hard drive technology and expertise to develop new products for these emerging markets, it will likely harm our operating results.

  We depend on our key personnel.

      Our success depends upon the continued contributions of our key employees, many of whom would be extremely difficult to replace. Worldwide competition for skilled employees in the hard drive industry is intense. We have lost a number of experienced hard drive engineers over the past two years as a result of the loss of retention value of their employee stock options (because of the decrease in price of our common stock) and aggressive recruiting of our employees. If we are unable to retain our existing employees or hire and integrate new employees, our operating results would likely be harmed.

Risk factors relating to Western Digital particularly

      A majority of our revenue comes from a few customers. For example, during 2000, sales to our top 10 customers accounted for approximately 57% of revenues. These customers have a wide variety of suppliers to choose from and therefore can make substantial demands on us. Even if we successfully qualify a product with a customer, the customer generally is not obligated to purchase any minimum volume of products from us and is able to terminate its relationship with us at any time. Our ability to maintain strong relationships with our

24

      Because we do not manufacture any of the components in our hard drives, an extended shortage of required components or the failure of key suppliers to remain in business, adjust to market conditions, or to meet our quality, yield or production requirements could harm us more severely than our competitors, some of whom manufacture certain of the components for their hard drives. A number of the components used by us are available from only a single or limited number of qualified outside suppliers. If a component is in short supply, or a supplier fails to qualify or has a quality issue with a component, we may experience delays or increased costs in obtaining that component. This occurred in September 1999 when we had to shut down our Caviar product line production for approximately two weeks as a result of a faulty power driver chip which was sole-sourced from a third-party supplier.

      To reduce the risk of component shortages, we attempt to provide significant lead times when buying these components. As a result, we may have to pay significant cancellation charges to suppliers if we cancel orders, as we did in 1998 when we accelerated our transition to magnetoresistive recording head technology, and as we did in 2000 as a result of our decision to exit the enterprise hard drive market.

      In April 1999, we entered into a three year volume purchase agreement with Komag under which we buy a substantial portion of our media components from Komag. This strategic relationship has reduced our media component costs; however, it has increased our dependence on Komag as a supplier. Our future operating results will depend substantially on Komag’s ability to timely qualify its media components in our new development programs and to supply us with these components in sufficient volume to meet our production requirements. Any disruption in Komag’s ability to manufacture and supply us with media would likely harm our operating results.

      Under our “virtual vertical integration” business model, we do not manufacture any of the parts used in our hard drives. As a result, the success of our products depends on our ability to gain access to and integrate parts that are “best in class” from reliable component suppliers. To do so we must effectively manage our relationships with our strategic component suppliers. We must also effectively integrate different products from a variety of suppliers and manage difficult scheduling and delivery problems.

      Our volume manufacturing operations currently are based in one facility in Malaysia. A fire, flood, earthquake or other disaster or condition affecting our facility would almost certainly result in a loss of substantial sales and revenue and harm our operating results.

      We are subject to risks associated with our foreign manufacturing operations, including:

	•	obtaining requisite United States and foreign governmental permits and approvals
	•	currency exchange rate fluctuations or restrictions
	•	political instability and civil unrest
	•	transportation delays or higher freight rates

25

	•	labor problems
	•	trade restrictions or higher tariffs
	•	exchange, currency and tax controls and reallocations
	•	loss or non-renewal of favorable tax treatment under agreements or treaties with foreign tax authorities.

      We have attempted to manage the impact of foreign currency exchange rate changes by, among other things, entering into short-term, forward exchange contracts. However, those contracts do not cover our full exposure and can be canceled by the issuer if currency controls are put in place, as occurred in Malaysia during the first quarter of 1999. As a result of the Malaysian currency controls, we are no longer hedging the Malaysian currency risk.

      We have recently entered the storage subsystem market through our Connex subsidiary. In this market we are facing the challenges of building volume and market share in a market which is new to us but which has several established and well-funded competitors. There is already significant competition for skilled engineers, both in the hardware and software areas, in this market. Our success will depend on Connex’s ability to develop, introduce and achieve market acceptance of new products, applications and product enhancements, and to attract and retain skilled engineers. Additionally, our competitors in this market have established intellectual property portfolios. Our success will also depend on our ability to license existing intellectual property or create new innovations. Moreover, our competitors’ established intellectual property portfolios increase our risk of intellectual property litigation.

      We are also developing storage devices for the emerging audio-visual market. We will be facing the challenge of developing products for a market that is still evolving and subject to rapid changes and shifting consumer preferences. There are several competitors which have also entered this emerging market, and there is no assurance that the market for digital storage devices for audio-visual content will materialize or support all of these competitors.

      We have recently entered the data warehouse software and services market through our SageTree subsidiary and are considering other initiatives related to data and content management, storage and communication. In any of these initiatives we will be facing the challenge of developing products and services for markets that are still evolving and which have many current and potential competitors. If we are not successful in these new initiatives it will likely harm our operating results.

      The hard drive industry has been characterized by significant litigation. This includes litigation relating to patent and other intellectual property rights, product liability claims and other types of litigation. We are currently evaluating notices of alleged patent infringement or notices of patents from patent holders. We also are a party to several judicial and other proceedings relating to patent and other intellectual property rights. If we conclude that a claim of infringement is valid, we may be required to obtain a license or cross-license or modify our existing technology or design a new non-infringing technology. Such licenses or design modifications can be extremely costly. We may also be liable for any past infringement. If there is an adverse ruling against us in an infringement lawsuit, an injunction could be issued barring production or sale of any infringing product. It could also result in a damage award equal to a reasonable royalty or lost profits or, if there is a finding of willful infringement, treble damages. Any of these results would likely increase our costs and harm our operating results.

26

      Our success depends, in significant part, on the proprietary nature of our technology, including non-patentable intellectual property such as our process technology. Despite safeguards, to the extent that a competitor is able to reproduce or otherwise capitalize on our technology, it may be difficult, expensive or impossible for us to obtain necessary legal protection. Also, the laws of some foreign countries may not protect our intellectual property to the same extent as do the laws of the United States. In addition to patent protection of intellectual property rights, we consider elements of our product designs and processes to be proprietary and confidential. We rely upon employee, consultant and vendor non-disclosure agreements and a system of internal safeguards to protect our proprietary information. However, any of our registered or unregistered intellectual property rights may be challenged or exploited by others in the industry, which might harm our operating results.

      If we do not forecast total quarterly demand accurately, it can have a material adverse effect on our quarterly results. We typically book and ship a high percentage of our total quarterly sales in the third month of the quarter, which makes it is difficult for us to match our production plans to customer demands. In addition, our quarterly projections and results may be subject to significant fluctuations as a result of a number of other factors including:

	•	the timing of orders from and shipment of products to major customers
	•	our product mix
	•	changes in the prices of our products
	•	manufacturing delays or interruptions
	•	acceptance by customers of competing products in lieu of our products
	•	variations in the cost of components for our products
	•	limited access to components that we obtain from a single or a limited number of suppliers, such as Komag
	•	competition and consolidation in the data storage industry
	•	seasonal and other fluctuations in demand for computers often due to technological advances.

  Rapidly changing market conditions in the hard drive industry make it difficult to estimate actual results.

      We have made and continue to make a number of estimates and assumptions relating to our consolidated financial reporting. The rapidly changing market conditions with which we deal means that actual results may differ significantly from our estimates and assumptions. Key estimates and assumptions for us include:

	•	accruals for warranty against product defects
	•	price protection adjustments on products sold to resellers and distributors
	•	inventory adjustments for write-down of inventories to fair value
	•	reserves for doubtful accounts
	•	accruals for product returns.

27

  The market price of our common stock is volatile.

      The market price of our common stock has been, and may continue to be, extremely volatile. Factors such as the following may significantly affect the market price of our common stock:

	•	actual or anticipated fluctuations in our operating results
	•	announcements of technological innovations by us or our competitors which may decrease the volume and profitability of sales of our existing products and increase the risk of inventory obsolescence
	•	new products introduced by us or our competitors
	•	periods of severe pricing pressures due to oversupply or price erosion resulting from competitive pressures
	•	developments with respect to patents or proprietary rights
	•	conditions and trends in the hard drive, data and content management, storage and communication industries
	•	changes in financial estimates by securities analysts relating specifically to us or the hard drive industry in general.

      In addition, the stock market in recent months has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have particularly affected the stock price of many high technology companies. These fluctuations are often unrelated to the operating performance of the companies.

      Securities class action lawsuits are often brought against companies after periods of volatility in the market price of their securities. A number of such suits have been filed against us in the past, and any of these litigation matters could result in substantial costs and a diversion of resources and management’s attention.

  We may be unable to raise future capital through debt or equity financing.

      Due to our recent financial performance and the risks described in this Report, in the future we may be unable to maintain adequate financial resources for capital expenditures, working capital and research and development. Our prior borrowing agreement with our banks matured on March 31, 2000, and we have signed an agreement for a new credit facility for our HDS division. If we decide to increase or accelerate our capital expenditures or research and development efforts, or if results of operations do not meet our expectations, we could require additional debt or equity financing. However, we cannot insure that additional financing will be available to us or available on favorable terms. An equity financing could also be dilutive to our existing stockholders.

Item 7A.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Disclosure About Foreign Currency Risk

      Although the majority of the Company’s transactions are in U.S. Dollars, some transactions are based in various foreign currencies. From time to time, the Company purchases short-term, forward exchange contracts to hedge the impact of foreign currency fluctuations on certain underlying assets, liabilities and commitments for operating expenses denominated in foreign currencies. The purpose of entering into these hedge transactions is to minimize the impact of foreign currency fluctuations on the results of operations. A majority of the increases or decreases in the Company’s local currency operating expenses are offset by gains and losses on the hedges. The contracts have maturity dates that do not exceed twelve months. The unrealized gains and losses on these contracts are deferred and recognized in the results of operations in the period in which the hedged transaction is consummated. The Company does not purchase short-term forward exchange contracts for trading purposes.

      Historically, the Company has focused on hedging its foreign currency risk related to the Singapore Dollar, the British Pound and the Malaysian Ringgit. With the establishment of currency controls and the prohibition of purchases or sales of the Malaysian Ringgit by offshore companies, the Company discontinued

28

      As of June 30, 2000, the Company had outstanding the following purchased foreign currency forward exchange contracts (in millions, except average contract rate):

      In 1998, 1999, and 2000 total realized transaction and forward exchange contract currency gains and losses (excluding the $7.5 million realized loss on the Malaysian Ringgits realized in 1999), were immaterial to the consolidated financial statements. Based on historical experience, the Company does not expect that a significant change in foreign exchange rates (up to approximately 25%) would materially affect the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Disclosure About Other Market Risks

  Fixed Interest Rate Risk

      At June 30, 2000, the market value of the Company’s 5.25% zero coupon convertible subordinated debentures due in 2018 was approximately $111.6 million, compared to the related book value of $225.5 million. The convertible debentures will be repurchased by the Company, at the option of the holder, as of February 18, 2003, February 18, 2008, or February 18, 2013, or if there is a Fundamental Change (as defined in the Debenture documents), at the issue price plus accrued original issue discount to the date of redemption. The payment on those dates, with the exception of a Fundamental Change, can be in cash, stock or any combination, at the Company’s option.

      Between July 1, 2000 and September 26, 2000, the Company issued 6.3 million shares of common stock in exchange for Debentures with a book value of $49.8 million and an aggregate principal amount at maturity of $122.7 million. As of September 26, 2000, the market value of the convertible subordinated debentures was approximately $116.9 million, compared to the related book value of $178.7 million.

      The Company has various notes receivable from other companies. All of the notes carry a fixed rate of interest. Therefore a significant change in interest rates would not cause these notes to impact the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

  Variable Interest Rate Risk

      At the option of HDS, borrowings under the new Senior Credit Facility would bear interest at either LIBOR (with option periods of one to three months) or a base rate, plus a margin determined by the borrowing base. This is the only debt which does not have a fixed-rate of interest. A change in interest rates resulting in rates as high as 12% would not materially impact the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

      The new Senior Credit Facility requires HDS to maintain certain amounts of tangible net worth, prohibits the payment of cash dividends on common stock and contains a number of other covenants. As of the date hereof, there were no borrowings under the new Senior Credit Facility.

29

  Fair Value Risk

      The Company owned approximately 10.8 million shares of Komag, Inc. common stock at June 30, 2000 (See Notes 1 and 8 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements). The stock is restricted as to the percentage of total shares which can be sold in a given time period. The unrestricted portion of the total Komag shares acquired represents the shares which can be sold within one year. The Company determines, on a quarterly basis, the fair market value of the unrestricted Komag shares and records an unrealized gain or loss resulting from the difference in the fair market value of the unrestricted shares as of the previous quarter end and the fair market value of the unrestricted shares on the measurement date. As of June 30, 2000, a $9.6 million total accumulated unrealized loss had been recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). If the Company sells all or a portion of this stock, any unrealized gain or loss on the date of sale will be recorded as a realized gain or loss in the Company’s results of operations. As of June 30, 2000, the quoted market value of the Company’s Komag common stock holdings, without regard to discounts due to sales restrictions, was $18.9 million and the aggregate book value was $25.3 million.

      Between July 1, 2000, and September 15, 2000, the Company sold 4.9 million shares of the Komag common stock for $15.0 million in cash. As of September 21, 2000, the quoted market value of the Company’s remaining Komag common stock holdings, without regard to discounts due to sales restrictions, was $20.0 million. Due to market fluctuations, a decline in the stock’s fair market value could occur.

      The Company owns approximately 1.3 million shares of Vixel common stock. The Company determines, on a quarterly basis, the fair market value of the Vixel shares and records an unrealized gain or loss resulting from the difference in the fair market value of the shares as of the previous quarter end and the fair market value of the shares on the measurement date. As of June 30, 2000, a $11.0 million total accumulated unrealized gain has been recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). If the Company sells all or a portion of this common stock, any unrealized gain or loss on the date of sale will be recorded as a realized gain or loss in the Company’s results of operations. As a result of market conditions, the market value of the shares had declined from $11.0 million as of June 30, 2000 to $9.9 million as of September 21, 2000. Due to market fluctuations, an additional decline in the stock’s fair market value could occur.

30

Item 8.  Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Index to Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedule

31

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT

The Board of Directors

      We have audited the consolidated financial statements of Western Digital Corporation and subsidiaries as listed in the accompanying index. In connection with our audits of the consolidated financial statements, we also have audited the financial statement schedule as listed in the accompanying index. These consolidated financial statements and the financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and the financial statement schedule based on our audits.

      We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

      In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Western Digital Corporation and subsidiaries as of July 3, 1999 and June 30, 2000, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended June 30, 2000, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

	KPMG LLP

Orange County, California

	July 27, 2000, except as to Note 11,

which is as of September 26, 2000.

32

WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

33

WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

34

WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIENCY)

[Additional columns below]

[Continued from above table, first column(s) repeated]

		Total
		Comprehensive
		Income (Loss)
Balance at June 28, 1997
Common stock repurchase program
Exercise of stock options
ESPP shares issued
Income tax benefit from stock options exercised
Net loss			(290,217	)
Balance at June  27, 1998		$	(290,217	)
ESPP shares issued
Exercise of stock options
Shares issued in connection with Connex acquisition
Net loss			(492,690	)
Unrealized loss on investment securities			(2,123	)
Balance at July 3, 1999		$	(494,813	)
ESPP shares issued
Exercise of stock options
Shares issued in debenture redemption and equity facility sales
Other shares issued
Net loss			(188,016	)
Unrealized gain on investment securities			3,490
Balance at June  30, 2000		$	(184,526	)

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

35

WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

36

WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1.  Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

      Western Digital Corporation (“Western Digital” or the “Company”) has prepared its consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and has adopted accounting policies and practices which are generally accepted in the industry in which it operates. Following are the Company’s significant accounting policies:

  Fiscal Year

      The Company has a 52 or 53-week fiscal year. In order to align its manufacturing and financial calendars, effective during the three months ended December 31, 1999, the Company changed its fiscal calendar so that each fiscal month ends on the Friday nearest to the last day of the calendar month. Prior to this change, the Company’s fiscal month ended on the Saturday nearest to the last day of the calendar month. The change did not have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations or financial position. The 1998, 1999 and 2000 fiscal years ended on June 27, July 3, and June 30, respectively, and consisted of 52 weeks for the fiscal years 1998 and 2000, and 53 weeks for the fiscal year 1999. All general references to years relate to fiscal years unless otherwise noted.

  Basis of Presentation

      The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its majority owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The accounts of foreign subsidiaries have been remeasured using the U.S. dollar as the functional currency. As such, foreign exchange gains or losses resulting from remeasurement of these accounts are reflected in the results of operations. These foreign exchange gains and losses were immaterial to the consolidated financial statements. Monetary and nonmonetary asset and liability accounts have been remeasured using the exchange rate in effect at each year end and using historical rates, respectively. Income statement accounts have been remeasured using average monthly exchange rates.

  Cash Equivalents

      The Company’s cash equivalents represent highly liquid investments, primarily money market funds and commercial paper, with original maturities of three months or less.

  Concentration of Credit Risk

      The Company designs, develops, manufactures and markets hard drives to personal computer manufacturers, resellers and retailers throughout the world. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers’ financial condition and generally requires no collateral. The Company maintains reserves for potential credit losses, and such losses have historically been within management’s expectations. The Company also has cash equivalent policies that limit the amount of credit exposure to any one financial institution or investment instrument, and require that investments be made only with financial institutions or in investment instruments evaluated as highly credit-worthy.

  Inventory Valuation

      Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Cost is on a first-in, first-out basis for raw materials and is computed on a currently adjusted standard basis (which approximates first-in, first-out) for work in process and finished goods.

      The Company maintains a base stock of two to three weeks of current finished goods inventory for certain key original equipment manufacturer (“OEM”) customers in facilities located adjacent to their operations. Inventory at these locations usually includes minor product customizations (such as labeling) for the related

37

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

OEM. If subsequent to its initial order the OEM changes its requirements, inventory held at these facilities can be sold to other OEM’s or distributors as is or with minor modifications (such as a change in labeling) at little or no additional cost.

  Depreciation and Amortization

      The cost of property and equipment is depreciated over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets. Depreciation is computed on a straight-line basis for financial reporting purposes and on an accelerated basis for income tax purposes. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the lesser of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the related lease terms. Goodwill and purchased technology, which are included in other assets, are capitalized at cost and amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated lives of five to fifteen years. Other intangible assets, including intangibles acquired from IBM pursuant to a joint technology development agreement (See Note 4), are amortized over their expected useful lives or the lives of the related products.

      The Company reviews identifiable intangibles, goodwill and other long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate the carrying amounts may not be recoverable. If the sum of the expected future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) is less than the carrying amount of an asset, an impairment loss is recognized.

  Revenue Recognition

      The Company recognizes revenue at time of shipment, net of pricing adjustments and estimated sales returns. In accordance with standard industry practice, the Company’s agreements with certain resellers provide price protection for inventories held by the resellers at the time of published list price reductions and, under certain circumstances, stock rotation for slow-moving items. These agreements may be terminated upon written notice by either party. In the event of termination, the Company may be obligated to repurchase a certain portion of the resellers’ inventory. The Company recognizes revenue at the time of shipment on sales to resellers who have inventory repurchase agreements due to the Company’s ability to reasonably estimate future returns as well as the historically low levels of actual repurchases. Revenue recognized on sales to resellers with inventory repurchase agreements was $1,083, $841, and $683 million for fiscal years 1998, 1999 and 2000, respectively. Repurchases of inventory under such agreements were not material in 1998, 1999 and 2000.

  Warranty

      The Company records an accrual for estimated warranty costs when revenue is recognized. Warranty covers cost of repair or replacement of the hard drive and the warranty periods range from 1 to 3 years for all hard drives, except enterprise drives, which had a warranty period of 5 years. The Company has comprehensive processes with which to estimate accruals for warranty, which include specific detail on hard drives in the field by product type, historical field return rates and costs to repair. Although the Company believes that it has the continued ability to reasonably estimate warranty reserves, unforeseeable changes in factors used to estimate the accrual for warranty could occur. These unforeseeable changes could cause a material change in the Company’s warranty accrual estimate. Such a change would be recorded in the period in which the change was identified.

      The Company increased warranty accruals from 1998 to 1999 primarily due to a normal increase in units under warranty and the completion of the Company’s transition in its desktop product line from thin-film to the newer magnetoresistive head technology in the June 1998 quarter. This transition and experience with thin film returns, which indicated a higher return rate, higher cost of repair and longer duration of returns within the warranty period, resulted in an increase in warranty accruals. Prior to 1999, the Company’s experience with returns of older generation thin-film products was that a large percentage of the products which were going to fail, failed in the first six months after sale. However, with the advancements in thin-film recording

38

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

technology, the gaps between critical components (principally the recording heads and disks) within the drive became much smaller until they were almost in contact with one another. This made the thin-film drives much more susceptible to environmental factors which typically manifest themselves over longer periods of time, such as gases released from the surrounding environment that may permeate through or from other components in the drive. In early 1999, the Company began to see consistent data indicating a higher percentage of advanced thin-film drives coming back after the first six months. That, combined with the significant amount of these drives that were in the field, led to a higher lifetime return rate being applied to a larger base of products in the field and an incremental warranty provision was recorded.

  Advertising Expense

      Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. Selling, general and administrative expenses of the Company include advertising costs of $17.4, $14.3, and $9.0 million in 1998, 1999 and 2000, respectively.

  Income Taxes

      The Company accounts for income taxes using the liability method under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” (“SFAS 109”). This method generally provides that deferred tax assets and liabilities be recognized for temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of the Company’s assets and liabilities and expected benefits of utilizing net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards. The Company records a valuation allowance for certain temporary differences for which it is more likely than not that it will not receive future tax benefits. The impact on deferred taxes of changes in tax rates and laws, if any, are applied to the years during which temporary differences are expected to be settled and reflected in the consolidated financial statements in the period of enactment.

  Per Share Information

      The Company computes basic loss per share using the net loss and the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Dilutive loss per share is computed using the net loss and the weighted average number of common shares and dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period. Dilutive common shares include outstanding employee stock options, employee stock purchase plan shares and common shares issuable upon conversion of the convertible debentures. The effects of these items were not included in the computation of diluted loss per share for each period presented as their effect would have been anti-dilutive (See Note 9).

  Stock-Based Compensation

      The Company has adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (“SFAS 123”). SFAS 123 establishes the financial accounting and reporting standards for stock-based compensation plans. The Company elected to continue accounting for stock-based employee compensation plans in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” and related interpretations (“APB Opinion No. 25”), as SFAS 123 permits, and to follow the pro forma net income (loss), pro forma earnings (loss) per share, and stock-based compensation plan disclosure requirements set forth in SFAS 123. (See Note 6).

  Fair Value of Financial Instruments

      The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents approximates fair value for all periods presented because of the short-term maturity of these financial instruments. The fair value of the Company’s convertible debentures is estimated by reference to quoted information from market sources. At June 30, 2000, the market value of the Company’s convertible debentures was approximately $111.6 million, compared to the related

39

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

carrying value of $225.5 million. The carrying amounts of all other financial instruments in the consolidated balance sheets, with the exception of the Komag common stock classified as long-term (discussed below), approximate fair values.

  Investments

      The Company’s investments in unrestricted, marketable equity securities have been classified as “available for sale”, are included in other current assets, and are carried at fair value. The classification of a security is determined at the acquisition date and reviewed periodically. The Company reviews, on a quarterly basis, the fair market value of the available for sale securities and records an unrealized gain or loss resulting from the difference between the fair market value at the time of the acquisition and the fair market value on the measurement date. The unrealized gains or losses are shown as a component of shareholders’ deficiency. Securities that are not classified as “available for sale” are carried at cost. The Company periodically reviews its cost-basis investments for instances where fair value is less than cost to determine if the decline in value is other than temporary. If the decline in value is judged to be other than temporary, the cost basis of the security is written down to fair value. The amount of any write-down would be included in the results of operations as a realized loss. Realized gains and losses resulting from the sale of securities are determined using the specific identification method.

      The Company owned approximately 10.8 million shares of Komag common stock at June 30, 2000, which when acquired on April 8, 1999, had a fair market value of $34.9 million. The stock is restricted as to the number of shares which can be sold in a given time period. The restrictions lapse over a three and one-half year period. As of June 30, 2000, approximately 60% of these shares could be sold within twelve months. Because the Company has identified these shares as “available for sale” under the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 115, “Investments in Certain Debt and Equity Securities” (“SFAS 115”), the amount sellable within twelve months was marked to market value using published closing prices of Komag stock as of June 30, 2000. Accordingly, a total accumulated unrealized loss of $9.6 million was included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). The aggregate book value of the total Komag shares was $25.3 million (market value of approximately $18.9 million) as of June 30, 2000, of which $11.3 million related to shares sellable within twelve months and was classified as current. Subsequent to June 30, 2000, the Company sold some of its Komaq common stock holdings (see Note 11).

      The Company owns approximately 1.3 million shares of Vixel Corporation (“Vixel”) common stock. The Company has identified these shares as “available for sale” under the provisions of SFAS 115. During the three months ended October 2, 1999, Vixel completed an initial public offering and the shares were marked to market value. At June 30, 2000 a total accumulated unrealized gain of $11.0 million is included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). The investment in Vixel common stock is classified as current. The aggregate carrying value of the shares, which approximates market value, is $11.0 million as of June 30, 2000.

  Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

      The Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 130, “Reporting Comprehensive Income” (“SFAS 130”), beginning with the Company’s fourth quarter of 1999. Prior to the fourth quarter of 1999, the Company did not possess any components of other comprehensive income as defined by SFAS 130. SFAS 130 separates comprehensive income into two components: net income (loss) and other comprehensive income (loss). Other comprehensive income (loss) refers to revenue, expenses, gains and losses that are recorded as an element of shareholders’ equity (deficiency) but are excluded from net income (loss). While SFAS 130 establishes new rules for the reporting and display of comprehensive income (loss), SFAS 130 has no impact on the Company’s net loss or total shareholders’ deficiency. The Company’s other

40

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

comprehensive income (loss) is comprised of unrealized gains and losses on marketable securities categorized as “available for sale” under SFAS 115.

  Minority Interest in Subsidiary

      In June 2000, the Company’s subsidiary, Sagetree, Inc. (“Sagetree”), received cash proceeds of $10.0 million from NCR Corporation in exchange for a minority voting interest in Sagetree at June 30, 2000. The Company reflects the portion of the earnings or losses of Sagetree which are applicable to the minority interest as an adjustment to minority interest on the consolidated balance sheets, and as a component of other income (expense) on the consolidated statements of operations. For the year ended June 30, 2000, the amount of minority interest in Sagetree’s losses was not material to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

  Foreign Exchange Contracts

      Although the majority of the Company’s transactions are in U.S. Dollars, some transactions are based in various foreign currencies. From time to time, the Company purchases short-term, forward exchange contracts to hedge the impact of foreign currency fluctuations on certain underlying assets, liabilities and commitments for operating expenses denominated in foreign currencies. The purpose of entering into these hedge transactions is to minimize the impact of foreign currency fluctuations on the results of operations. The contracts have maturity dates that do not exceed twelve months. The unrealized gains and losses on these contracts are deferred and recognized in the results of operations in the period in which the hedged transaction effects the results of operations. Costs associated with entering into such contracts are typically amortized over the life of the instrument. The Company does not purchase short-term forward exchange contracts for trading purposes.

      In response to the Company’s underlying foreign currency exposures, the Company may, from time to time, adjust its foreign currency hedging position by taking out additional contracts or by terminating or offsetting existing foreign currency forward exchange contracts. Gains or losses on terminated contracts and offsetting contracts are recognized in the results of operations in the periods in which the hedged transactions effect the results of operations.

      The Company had outstanding forward exchange contracts with commercial banks with nominal values of $241.9, $66.4 and $13.5 million, at June 27, 1998, July 3, 1999 and June 30, 2000, respectively. The total unrealized gains and losses on outstanding forward exchange contracts and foreign currency transactions were not material to the consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended June 27, 1998 and June 30, 2000. For the year ended July 3, 1999, the total net loss on foreign currency transactions and forward exchange contracts was $10.3 million. Of this amount, a realized loss of $7.5 million on terminated hedging contracts was recorded due to the imposition of exchange controls by the Malaysian government. Historically, the Company has focused on hedging its foreign currency risk related to the Singapore Dollar, the British Pound and the Malaysian Ringgit. With the establishment of currency controls and the prohibition of purchases or sales of the Malaysian Ringgit by offshore companies, the Company has discontinued hedging its Malaysian Ringgit currency risk. Future hedging of this currency will depend on currency conditions in Malaysia. As a result of the closure of the Company’s Singapore operations in 2000, the Company has also discontinued its hedging program related to the Singapore Dollar.

  Use of Estimates

      Company management has made estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of certain assets and liabilities in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

41

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

  Reclassifications

      Certain prior years’ amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

  New Accounting Pronouncements

      In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“SFAS 133”). SFAS 133 was effective for all fiscal quarters for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 1999. In August 1999, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 137, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities — Deferral of the Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 133, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133” (“SFAS 137”), which defers the effective date of SFAS 133 to all fiscal quarters for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2000. In June 2000, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 138, “Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities, an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133”. SFAS 133, as amended, establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments embedded in other contracts and for hedging activities. The application of these statements is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity, and the Company does not anticipate recording a significant adjustment as a result of the transition to these statements.

      In December 1999, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) issued Staff Accounting Bulletin 101 (“SAB101”) “Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements”. This Staff Accounting Bulletin summarizes certain of the staff’s views in applying generally accepted accounting principles to revenue recognition in financial statements. The Company will be required to follow the guidance in SAB101 no later than its fourth quarter of 2001, with restatement of earlier quarters in 2001 required, if necessary. The SEC has recently indicated it intends to issue further guidance with respect to adoption of specific issues addressed by SAB101. Until such time as this additional guidance is issued, the Company is unable to assess the impact, if any, SAB101 may have on its consolidated financial position or results of operations.

      In March 2000, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 44 “Accounting for Certain Transactions Involving Stock Compensation — an interpretation of APB Opinion No. 25” (“FIN 44”). This Interpretation clarifies the definition of an employee for purposes of applying Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” (“APB 25”), the criteria for determining whether a plan qualifies as a noncompensatory plan, the accounting consequence of various modifications to the terms of a previously fixed stock option or award, and the accounting for an exchange of stock compensation awards in a business combination. This Interpretation is effective July 1, 2000, but certain conclusions in this Interpretation cover specific events that occur after either December 15, 1998 or January 12, 2000. The adoption of FIN 44 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

42

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Note 2.  Supplemental Financial Statement Data (in thousands)