Goodwill Impairment. SFAS 142 requires goodwill to be tested for impairment under certain circumstances, written down when impaired, and requires purchased intangible assets other than goodwill to be amortized over their useful lives unless these lives are determined to be indefinite. We have adopted these new rules as of January 1, 2002. Under the transition provisions of SFAS No. 142, there was no goodwill impairment at January 1, 2002 based upon our analysis at that time. However, during the quarter ended June 30, 2002, circumstances developed that indicated the goodwill was likely impaired and we performed an impairment analysis as of June 30, 2002. This analysis resulted in a $55.0 million impairment expense to reduce goodwill. The circumstances that led to the impairment included the revision of estimates of our revenues and net loss for the second quarter of 2002 and subsequent quarters, based upon preliminary revenue results late in the second quarter of 2002 and the reduction of estimated future revenues and cash flows. As a result, we announced preliminary second quarter 2002 results on July 2, 2002. Following this announcement, the decline in the trading price of our common stock reduced KANA's market capitalization below the net carrying value of goodwill prior to the impairment charge on June 30, 2002. We determined fair value using relevant market data, including KANA's market capitalization during the period following the revision of estimates, to calculate an estimated fair value and any resulting goodwill impairment. The estimated fair value was compared to the corresponding carrying value of goodwill at June 30, 2002, which resulted in a revaluation of goodwill as of June 30, 2002. The remaining amount of goodwill as of June 30, 2002 is $7.4 million.

In 2001, we performed an impairment assessment of the identifiable intangibles and goodwill recorded in connection with the acquisition of Silknet, under the provisions of SFAS No. 121, Accounting for the Impairment of Long- Lived Assets and for Lon-Lived Assets to Be Disposed of. The assessment was performed primarily due to the significant sustained decline in our stock price since the valuation date of the shares issued in the Silknet acquisition resulting in our net book value of our assets prior to the impairment charge significantly exceeding our market capitalization, the overall decline in the industry growth rates, and our lower than projected operating results. As a result, we recorded an impairment charge of approximately $603.4 million to reduce goodwill in the first quarter of 2001. The charge was based upon the estimated discounted cash flows over the remaining useful life of the goodwill using a discount rate of 20%. The assumptions supporting the cash flows, including the discount rate, were determined using our best estimates.

Other income consists primarily of interest income earned on cash and investments, offset by interest expense relating to operating and capital leases. We expect other income to fluctuate in accordance with our cash balances as well as the prime interest rate.

We have incurred operating losses for all periods from inception through June 30, 2002, and therefore have not recorded a provision for income taxes. We have recorded a valuation allowance for the full amount of our gross deferred tax assets, as the future realization of the tax benefit is not currently likely.

During the quarter ended June 30, 2001, we adopted a plan to discontinue the KANA Online business. We will no longer seek new business but will continue to service all ongoing contractual obligations we have to our existing customers. Accordingly, KANA Online is reported as a discontinued operation. The net liability of the discontinued operation at June 30, 2002, consisted of a liability for leased equipment. The estimated loss on the disposal of KANA Online recorded during the second quarter of 2001 was $3.7 million, consisting of an estimated loss on disposal of the business of $2.6 million and a provision of $1.1 million for the anticipated operating losses during the phase-out period. This estimate was revised in the second quarter of 2002, resulting in a gain of $0.4 million.

There was no revenue from our discontinued operation for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002. Revenues from our discontinued operation were $1.3 million for the three months and $3.0 million for six months ended June 30, 2001.

As of June 30, 2002, we had $47.0 million in cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments, compared to $40.1 million at December 31, 2001. As of June 30, 2002, we had a negative working capital of $4.6 million. In addition, as of June 30, 2002, we had $8.9 million in restricted cash. This comprises amounts related to a letter of credit totaling $5.8 million of cash escrowed in order to fulfill certain contractual obligations. This letter of credit is expected to be canceled in August of 2002 and a total of $6.9 million transferred as partial satisfaction of an obligation - see "-Critical Accounting Policies- Reserve for Loss Contract". In addition, restricted cash included $3.1 million pledged as collateral on our leased facilities and other long-term deposits.

Our operating activities used $21.8 million of cash for the six months ended June 30, 2002, which comprises $89.4 million lossoff set by $71.1 million in net non-cash charges, and includes $15.3 million in payments relating to merger and restructuring liabilities, offset by a $2.3 million increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities and an $8.7 million increase in deferred revenue. Other working capital changes totaled a net $0.7 million. Our operating activities used $69.5 million of cash for the six months ended June 30, 2001, comprised of an $822.7 million net loss experienced during the period offset by $740.4 million in non-cash charges and $12.8 million, net, in other working capital decreases.

Our investing activities used $17.0 million of cash for the six months ended June 30, 2002, resulting from $7.7 million of property and equipment purchases and $11.5 million of short-term investment purchases, offset by a $2.2 million increase in cash due to redemptions of restricted cash. Our investing activities provided $31.9 million of cash for the six months ended June 30, 2001 from $49.2 million of net acquired cash from the acquisition of Broadbase offset by Silknet acquisition-related costs of $13.1 million and $4.2 million of purchases of property and equipment purchases.

Our financing activities provided $33.9 million in cash for the six months ended June 30, 2002, primarily due to net proceeds from the private placement of 2,910,000 shares of our common stock, which raised net proceeds of approximately $31.4 million. Our financing activities provided $2.4 million in cash for the six months ended June 30, 2001, primarily due to payments on stockholders' notes receivable.

We have a line of credit totaling $4.0 million, which is collateralized by all of our assets, bears interest at the bank's prime rate plus 0.25% (5.0% as of June 30, 2002), and expires in March 2003 at which time the entire balance under the line of credit will be due. Total borrowings as of June 30, 2002 were approximately $1.2 million under this line of credit. The line of credit requires that we maintain at least a $6.0 million dollar balance in any account at the bank or that we provide cash collateral with funds equivalent to 115% of the outstanding debt obligation. The line of credit also requires that we maintain at all times a minimum of $20.0 million as short-term unrestricted cash and cash equivalents. If we default under this line of credit, including through a violation of any of these covenants, the entire balance under the line of credit will become immediately due and payable. As of June 30, 2002, we were in compliance with all covenants of the line of credit agreement.

Throughout 2001, to reduce our expenditures, we restructured in several areas, including reduced staffing, expense management and capital spending. This restructuring included net workforce reductions of approximately 772 employees, which were implemented in order to streamline operations, eliminate redundant positions after the merger with Broadbase, and reduce costs and bring our staffing and structure in line with industry standards and current economic conditions. These reductions have been significant, particularly in light of the increase of approximately 896 employees upon our merger with Broadbase in June of 2001. Our most recent company-wide reduction in force, which reduced staff by approximately 365 positions across all departments, was announced on September 28, 2001. We have also reduced headcount in the third quarter of 2002, by a net 24 positions as of August 9, 2002, primarily in sales positions in relation to our shift in strategy to work more closely with third-party integrators. We expect our cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments on hand will be sufficient to meet our working capital and capital expenditure needs for the next 12 months. Significant expected cash outflows through the remainder of 2002 include $6.9 million to be transferred into an escrow account (which includes $5.8 million recorded as restricted cash as of June 30, 2002) pursuant to an amendment of a contract with a customer (see "-Critical Accounting Policies-Reserve for Loss Contract"), approximately $3.0 million in payments relating to accrued merger and restructuring costs, as well as approximately $7.0 million of expenditures on certain corporate infrastructure including internal-use software. If we experience a decrease in demand for our products from the level experienced in the second quarter of 2002, then we would need to reduce expenditures to a greater degree than anticipated, or raise additional funds, if possible.

Our expectations as to the amount and timing of our future cash transactions are subject to a number of assumptions, including assumptions regarding anticipated increases in our revenue, changes in general economic conditions and customer purchasing and payment patterns, many of which are beyond our control.

RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH KANA'S BUSINESS AND FUTURE OPERATING RESULTS

We are still in the early stages of our development, and our limited operating history makes it difficult to evaluate our business and prospects. Any evaluation of our business and prospects must be made in light of the risks and uncertainties often encountered by early-stage companies in Internet-related markets. We were incorporated in July 1996 and first recorded revenue in February 1998. Thus, we have a limited operating history upon which you can evaluate our business and prospects. Due to our limited operating history, it is difficult or impossible to predict future results of operations. For example, we cannot forecast operating expenses based on our historical results because they are limited, and we are required to forecast expenses in part on future revenue projections. Moreover, due to our limited operating history and evolving product offerings, our insights into trends that may emerge and affect our business are limited. In addition, in June 2001, we completed our merger with Broadbase. Because we have limited experience operating as a combined company, our business is even more difficult to evaluate. In addition, our business is subject to a number of risks, any of which could unexpectedly harm our results of operations. Many of these risks are discussed in the subheadings below, and include our ability to:

• attract more customers;
• implement our sales, marketing and after-sales service initiatives, both domestically and internationally;
• execute our product development activities;
• anticipate and adapt to the changing Internet market;
• attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel;
• respond to actions taken by our competitors;
• continue to build an infrastructure to effectively manage growth and handle any future increased usage; and
• integrate acquired businesses, technologies, products and services.

Our quarterly revenues and operating results are difficult to predict and may fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter particularly because our products and services are relatively new and our prospects are uncertain. We believe that period-to-period comparisons of our operating results may not be meaningful and you should not rely on these comparisons as an indication of our future performance. If quarterly revenues or operating results fall below the expectations of investors or public market analysts, the price of our common stock could decline substantially. Factors that might cause quarterly fluctuations in our operating results include the factors described under the subheadings of this "Risks Associated with KANA's Business and Future Operating Results" section as well as:

• the evolving and varying demand for our customer communication software products and services for e-businesses;
• budget and spending decisions by information technology departments of our customers;
• our ability to manage our expenses;
• the timing of new releases of our products;
• changes in our pricing policies or those of our competitors;
• the timing of execution of large contracts that materially affect our operating results;
• uncertainty regarding the timing of the implementation cycle for our products;
• changes in the level of sales of professional services as compared to product licenses;
• the mix of sales channels through which our products and services are sold;
• the mix of our domestic and international sales;
• costs related to the customization of our products;
• our ability to expand our operations, and the amount and timing of expenditures related to this expansion;
• decisions by customers and potential customers to delay purchasing our products;
• a trend of continuing consolidation in our industry; and
• global economic and political conditions, as well as those specific to our customers or our industry.

We also often offer volume-based pricing, which may affect operating margins.

In addition, we experience seasonality in our revenues, with the fourth quarter of the year typically having the highest revenue for the year. We believe that this seasonality primarily results from customer budgeting cycles. We expect that this seasonality will continue, and could increase. Customers' decisions to purchase our products and services are discretionary and subject to their internal budgets and purchasing processes. Due to the continuing slowdown in the general economy, we believe that many existing and potential customers are reassessing or reducing their planned technology and Internet-related investments and deferring purchasing decisions. Further delays or reductions in business spending for information technology could have a material adverse effect on our revenues and operating results. As a result, there is increased uncertainty with respect to our expected revenues.

Our quarterly revenues are especially subject to fluctuation because they depend on the completion of relatively large orders for our products and related services. The average size of our license transactions has increased in recent periods as we have focused on larger enterprise customers and on licensing our more comprehensive integrated products. We expect the percentage of larger orders as related to total orders to increase. This dependence on large orders makes our net revenue and operating results more likely to vary from quarter to quarter because the loss of any particular large order is significant. As a result, our operating results could suffer if any large orders are delayed or cancelled in any future period.

Most of our expenses, such as employee compensation and rent, are relatively fixed in the short term. Moreover, our budget is based, in part, on our expectations regarding future revenue levels. As a result, if total revenues for a particular quarter are below expectations, we could not proportionately reduce operating expenses for that quarter. Accordingly, such a revenue shortfall would have a disproportionate effect on our expected operating results for that quarter.

Our sales cycle is subject to a number of significant risks, including customers' budgetary constraints and internal acceptance reviews, over which we have little or no control. Consequently, if sales expected from a specific customer in a particular quarter are not realized in that quarter, we are unlikely to be able to generate revenue from alternate sources in time to compensate for the shortfall. As a result, and due to the relatively large size of a typical order, a lost or delayed sale could result in revenues that are lower than expected. Moreover, to the extent that significant sales occur earlier than anticipated, revenues for subsequent quarters may be lower than expected. Consequently, we face difficulty predicting the quarter in which sales to expected customers will occur, which contributes to the uncertainty of our future operating results.

The long sales cycle for our products may cause license revenue and operating results to vary significantly from period to period. To date, the sales cycle for our products has taken anywhere from 3 to 12 months in the United States and longer in foreign countries. Consequently, we face difficulty predicting the quarter in which expected sales will actually occur. This contributes to fluctuations in our future operating results. Our sales cycle has required pre-purchase evaluation by a significant number of individuals in our customers' organizations. Along with third parties that often jointly market our software with us, we invest significant amounts of time and resources educating and providing information to prospective customers regarding the use and benefits of our products. Many of our customers evaluate our software slowly and deliberately, depending on the specific technical capabilities of the customer, the size of the deployment, the complexity of the customer's network environment, and the quantity of hardware and the degree of hardware configuration necessary to deploy our products. In the event that the current economic downturn were to continue, the sales cycle for our products may become longer and we may require more resources to complete sales.

Since we began operations in 1997, our revenues have not been sufficient to support our operations, and we have incurred substantial operating losses in every quarter. As of June 30, 2002, our accumulated deficit was approximately $4.2 billion. Our history of losses has previously caused some of our potential customers to question our viability, which has in turn hampered our ability to sell some of our products. Although this concern has been mitigated by our recently completed financing in February 2002, we may continue to encounter such customer concerns in the future. Additionally, our revenue has been affected by the increasingly uncertain economic conditions both generally and in our market. As a result of these conditions, we have experienced and expect to continue to experience difficulties in collecting outstanding receivables from our customers and attracting new customers, which means that we may continue to experience losses, even if sales of our products and services grow. Although our revenues grew significantly in 2000, we experienced a significant decline in sales for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001, and a decline in the second quarter of 2002 compared to the previous two quarters. Although we have restructured our operations to reduce operating expenses, we will need to increase our revenue to achieve profitability and positive cash flows, and our revenue may decline, or fail to grow, in future periods. Our expectations as to when we can achieve positive cash flows, and as to our future cash balances, are subject to a number of assumptions, including assumptions regarding improvements in general economic conditions and customer purchasing and payment patterns, many of which are beyond our control.

We reduced the size of our professional services team in 2001 and have begun to rely more on independent third-party providers for customer services such as product installations and support. However, if third parties do not provide the support our customers need, we may be required to hire subcontractors to provide these professional services. Increased use of subcontractors would harm our revenues and margins because it costs us more to hire subcontractors to perform these services than to provide the services ourselves.

If we fail to expand our direct and indirect sales channels, we will not be able to increase revenues.

In order to grow our business, we need to increase market awareness and sales of our products and services. To achieve this goal, we need to increase the size, and enhance the productivity, of our direct sales force and indirect sales channels. If we fail to do so, this failure could harm our ability to increase revenues. The expansion of our sales and marketing department will require the hiring and retention of personnel for whom there is a high demand. We plan to hire additional sales personnel, but competition for qualified sales people is intense, and we might not be able to hire a sufficient number of qualified sales people. See "-We may face difficulties in hiring and retaining qualified sales personnel to sell our products and services, which could impair our revenue growth." Furthermore, while historically we have received substantially all of our revenues from direct sales, we intend to increase sales through indirect sales channels by selling our software through systems integrators, or SIs. These SIs offer our software products to their customers together with consulting and implementation services or integrate our software solutions with other software. We expect to increase our reliance on SIs and other indirect sales channels in licensing our products. If this strategy is successful, our dependence on the efforts of third parties will increase. Our reliance upon third parties for these functions will reduce our control over such activities and could make us dependent upon them. SIs are not bound to sell our products exclusively, and may act as indirect sales channels for our competitors. In addition, SIs are not required to sell any fixed quantities of our products. If for some reason our SI partners do not adequately promote our products, we will lack a sufficient internal sales infrastructure to do so ourselves, and our product visibility, sales and revenues would decline.

We generally recognize revenue from a customer sale when persuasive evidence of an agreement exists, the product has been delivered, the arrangement does not involve significant customization of the software, the license fee is fixed or determinable and collection of the fee is probable. If an arrangement requires significant customization or implementation services from KANA, recognition of the associated license and service revenue could be delayed. The timing of the commencement and completion of the these services is subject to factors that may be beyond our control, as this process requires access to the customer's facilities and coordination with the customer's personnel after delivery of the software. In addition, customers could delay product implementations. Implementation typically involves working with sophisticated software, computing and communications systems. If we experience difficulties with implementation or do not meet project milestones in a timely manner, we could be obligated to devote more customer support, engineering and other resources to a particular project. Some customers may also require us to develop customized features or capabilities. If new or existing customers have difficulty deploying our products or require significant amounts of our professional services support or customized features, our revenue recognition could be further delayed and our costs could increase, causing increased variability in our operating results.

In connection with outstanding stock options and warrants to purchase shares of our common stock, as well as other equity rights we may issue, we are incurring and may incur substantial charges for stock-based compensation. Accordingly, significant increases in our stock price could result in substantial non-cash charges and variations in our results of operations. For example, in the first quarter of 2002, we incurred a stock-based compensation charge of approximately $4.7 million associated with warrants issued pursuant to an equity financing agreement that was terminated. Furthermore, we will continue to incur charges to reflect amortization and any impairment of identified intangible assets acquired in connection with our acquisition of Silknet, and we may make other acquisitions or issue additional stock or other securities in the future that could result in further accounting charges. In addition, a new standard for accounting for goodwill acquired in a business combination has recently been adopted. This new standard requires recognition of goodwill as an asset but does not permit amortization of goodwill. Instead goodwill must be separately tested for impairment. As a result, our goodwill amortization charges ceased in 2002. However, in the future, we may incur additional impairment charges related to the goodwill already recorded, as well as goodwill arising out of any future acquisitions. For example, we performed a transition impairment analysis as of June 30, 2002, which resulted in a $55.0 million impairment expense to reduce goodwill. Current and future accounting charges like these could result in significant losses and delay our achievement of net income.

In connection with our effort to streamline operations, reduce costs and bring our staffing and structure in line with industry standards, we restructured our organization in 2001, an effort that included substantial reductions in our workforce. There have been and may continue to be substantial costs associated with the workforce reductions, including severance and other employee-related costs, and our restructuring plan may yield unanticipated consequences, such as attrition beyond our planned reduction in workforce. As a result of these reductions, our ability to respond to unexpected challenges may be impaired and we may be unable to take advantage of new opportunities. We also reduced our employees' salaries in the fourth quarter of 2001, and to a lesser extent, in the third quarter of 2002, in order to bring employee compensation in-line with current market conditions. If market conditions change, we may find it necessary to raise salaries in the future beyond the anticipated levels, or issue additional stock-based compensation, which would be dilutive to shareholders.

In addition, many of the employees who were terminated possessed specific knowledge or expertise that may prove to have been important to our operations. In that case, their absence may create significant difficulties. This personnel reduction may also subject us to the risk of litigation, which may adversely impact our ability to conduct our operations and may cause us to incur significant expense.

Our recent reductions in force and salary levels may reduce employee morale and may create concern among existing employees about job security, which could lead to increased turnover and reduce our ability to meet the needs of our current and future customers. As a result of the reductions in force, we may also need to increase our staff to support new customers and the expanding needs of our existing customers. Although a number of technology companies have recently implemented lay-offs, substantial competition for experienced personnel remains, particularly in the San Francisco Bay Area, where we are headquartered, due to the limited number of people available with the necessary technical skills. Because our stock price has recently suffered a significant decline, stock-based compensation, including options to purchase our common stock, may have diminished effectiveness as employee hiring and retention devices. If we are unable to retain qualified personnel, we could face disruptions to operations, loss of key information, expertise or know-how and unanticipated additional recruitment and training costs. If employee turnover increases, our ability to provide client service and execute our strategy would be negatively affected.

Our ability to increase revenues in the future depends considerably upon our success in recruiting, training and retaining additional direct sales personnel and the success of our direct sales force. We might not be successful in these efforts. Our products and services require sophisticated sales efforts. There is a shortage of sales personnel with the requisite qualifications, and competition for such qualified personnel is intense in our industry. Also, it may take a new salesperson a number of months to become a productive member of our sales force. Our business will be harmed if we fail to hire or retain qualified sales personnel, or if newly hired salespeople fail to develop the necessary sales skills or develop these skills more slowly than anticipated. In addition, we announced the departure of our Chief Financial Officer in May of 2002. Turnover in management can cause disruptions to ongoing operations, and transitioning to the new Chief Financial Officer, or any other executive officer, could create negative perceptions of us among our customers and investors.

If our relationships with systems integrators are unsuccessful, our ability to market and sell our product will be limited.

We expect a significant percentage of our revenues to be derived from our relationships with domestic and international systems integrators, or SIs, that market and sell our products. If these SIs do not successfully market our products, our operating results will be materially harmed. In addition, many of our direct sales are to customers that will be relying on SIs to implement our products, and if SIs are not familiar with our technology or able to successfully implement our products, our operating results will be materially harmed. Because our relationships with SIs are relatively new, we cannot predict the degree to which the SIs will succeed in marketing and selling our solution. In addition, because the SI model for selling software is relatively new and unproven in the eCRM industry, we cannot predict the degree to which our potential customers will accept this delivery model. If the SIs fail to deliver and support our solution, end-users could decide not to subscribe, or cease subscribing, for our solution. The SIs typically offer our solution in combination with other products and services, some of which may compete with our solution.

We rely on marketing and technology relationships with a variety of companies that, in part, generate leads for the sale of our products. These marketing and technology relationships include relationships with:

• system integrators and consulting firms;
• vendors of e-commerce and Internet software;
• vendors of software designed for customer relationship management or for management of organizations' operational information;
• vendors of key technology and platforms; and
• demographic data providers.

If we cannot maintain successful marketing and technology relationships or if we fail to enter into additional marketing and technology relationships, we could have difficulty expanding the sales of our products and our growth might be limited. While some of these companies do not resell or distribute our products, we believe that many of our direct sales are the result of leads generated by vendors of e-business and enterprise software and we expect to continue relying heavily on sales from these relationships in future periods. Our marketing and technology relationships are generally not documented in writing, or are governed by agreements that can be terminated by either party with little or no prior notice. In addition, companies with which we have marketing, technology or distribution relationships may promote products of several different companies including those of our competitors. If these companies choose not to promote our products or if they develop, market or recommend software applications that compete with our products, our business will be harmed.

In addition, we rely on distributors, value-added resellers, systems integrators, consultants and other third-party resellers to recommend our products and to install and support these products. Our reduction in the size of our professional services team in 2001 increased our reliance on third parties for product installations and support. If the companies providing these services fail to implement our products successfully for our customers, we might be unable to complete implementation on the schedule required by the customers and we may have increased customer dissatisfaction or difficulty making future sales as a result. We might not be able to maintain these relationships and enter into additional relationships that will provide timely and cost-effective customer support and service. If we cannot maintain successful relationships with our indirect sales channel partners around the world, we might have difficulty expanding the sales of our products and our international growth could be limited.

The market for our products and services is intensely competitive, evolving and subject to rapid technological change. In recent periods, some of our competitors reduced the prices of their products and services (substantially in certain cases) in order to obtain new customers. Competitive pressures could make it difficult for us to acquire and retain customers and could require us to reduce the price of our products. Our customers' requirements and the technology available to satisfy those requirements are continually changing. Therefore, we must be able to respond to these changes in order to remain competitive. Changes in our products may also make it more difficult for our sales force to sell effectively. In addition, changes in customers' demand for the specific products, product features and services of other companies' may result in our products becoming uncompetitive. We expect the intensity of competition to increase in the future. Increased competition may result in price reductions, reduced gross margins and loss of market share. We may not be able to compete successfully against current and future competitors, and competitive pressures may seriously harm our business.

Our competitors vary in size and in the scope and breadth of products and services offered. We currently face competition for our products from systems designed by in-house and third-party development efforts. We expect that these systems will continue to be a major source of competition for the foreseeable future. Our competitors include a number of companies offering one or more products for the e-business communications and relationship management market, some of which compete directly with our products. For example, our competitors include companies providing stand-alone point solutions, including Accrue Software, Inc., Annuncio,Inc., AskJeeves, Inc., Avaya, Inc., Brightware, Inc.(which was acquired by Firepond, Inc.), Digital Impact, Inc., eGain Communications Corp., E.piphany, Inc., Inference Corp., Live Person, Inc., Marketfirst Software, Inc., and Responsys, Inc. In addition, we compete with larger, more established companies providing customer management and communications solutions, such as Clarify Inc. (which was acquired by Amdocs Limited), Alcatel, Oracle Corporation, Siebel Systems, Inc. and PeopleSoft, Inc. (which acquired Vantive Corporation). The level of competition we encounter has increased as a result of our acquisition of Broadbase. As we have combined and enhanced the KANA and Broadbase product lines to offer a more comprehensive e- business software solution, we are increasingly competing with large, established providers of customer management and communication solutions such as Siebel Systems, Inc. as well as other competitors. Our combined product line may not be sufficient to successfully compete with the product offerings available from these companies, which could slow our growth and harm our business.

Many of our competitors have longer operating histories, significantly greater financial, technical, marketing and other resources, significantly greater name recognition and a larger installed base of customers than we have. In addition, many of our competitors have well-established relationships with our current and potential customers and have extensive knowledge of our industry. We may lose potential customers to competitors for various reasons, including the ability or willingness of competitors to offer lower prices and other incentives that we cannot match. Accordingly, it is possible that new competitors or alliances among competitors may emerge and rapidly acquire significant market share. We also expect that competition will increase as a result of recent industry consolidations, as well as future consolidations.

The trading price of our common stock has fluctuated widely in the past and is expected to continue to do so in the future, as a result of a number of factors, many of which are outside our control, such as:

• variations in our actual and anticipated operating results;
• changes in our earnings estimates by analysts;
• the volatility inherent in stocks within the emerging sector within which we conduct business;
• and the volume of trading in our common stock, including sales of substantial amounts of common stock issued upon the exercise of outstanding options and warrants.

In addition, the stock market, particularly the Nasdaq National Market, has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have affected the market prices of many technology and computer software companies, particularly Internet-related companies. Such fluctuations have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of these companies. These broad market fluctuations could adversely affect the market price of our common stock. In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a particular company's securities, securities class action litigation has often been brought against that company. Securities class action litigation could result in substantial costs and a diversion of our management's attention and resources. Since our common stock began trading publicly in September 1999, our common stock reached a closing high equivalent to $1,698.10 per share and low equivalent to $1.41 per share through August 13, 2002. The last reported sales price of our shares on August 13, 2002 was $1.58 per share.

Our ability to achieve increased revenue depends on overall demand for e- business software and related services, and in particular for customer- relationship applications. We expect that our future growth will depend significantly on revenue from licenses of our e-business applications and related services. Market acceptance of these products will depend on the growth of the market for e-business solutions. This growth might not occur. Moreover, our target customers might not widely adopt and deploy our products and services. Our future financial performance will depend on the successful development, introduction and customer acceptance of new and enhanced versions of our products and services. In the future, we may not be successful in marketing our products and services, including any new or enhanced products.

The effectiveness of our products depends in part on the widespread adoption and use of these products by customer support personnel. Some of our customers who have made initial purchases of this software have deferred or suspended implementation of these products due to slower than expected rates of internal adoption by customer support personnel. If more customers decide to defer or suspend implementation of these products in the future, our ability to increase our revenue from these customers through additional licenses or maintenance agreements will also be impaired, and our financial position could be seriously harmed.

Our business model generally depends on the sale of our products to new customers as well as on expanded use of our products within our customers' organizations. If we fail to grow our customer base or generate repeat and expanded business from our current and future customers, our business and operating results will be seriously harmed. In some cases, our customers initially make a limited purchase of our products and services for pilot programs. These customers may not purchase additional licenses to expand their use of our products. If these customers do not successfully develop and deploy initial applications based on our products, they may choose not to purchase deployment licenses or additional development licenses.

In addition, as we introduce new versions of our products or new product lines, our current customers might not require the functionality of our new products and might not ultimately license these products. Because the total amount of maintenance and support fees we receive in any period depends in large part on the size and number of licenses that we have previously sold, any downturn in our software license revenue would negatively affect our future services revenue. In addition, if customers elect not to renew their maintenance agreements, our services revenue could decline significantly. Further, some of our customers are Internet-based companies, which have been forced to significantly reduce their operations in light of limited access to sources of financing and the current economic slowdown. If customers were unable to pay for their current products or are unwilling to purchase additional products, our revenues would decline.

If we do not continue to improve our products and develop new products that keep pace with competitive product introductions and technological developments, satisfy diverse and rapidly evolving customer requirements and achieve market acceptance, we might be unable to attract new customers. The development of proprietary technology and necessary service enhancements entails significant technical and business risks and requires substantial expenditures and lead-time. We might not be successful in marketing and supporting recently released versions of our products, or developing and marketing other product enhancements and new products that respond to technological advances and market changes, on a timely or cost-effective basis. In addition, even if these products are developed and released, they might not achieve market acceptance. We have experienced delays in releasing new products and product enhancements in the past and could experience similar delays in the future. These delays or problems in the installation or implementation of our new releases could cause us to lose customers.

Rapidly changing technology and operating systems, changes in customer requirements, and evolving industry standards might impede market acceptance of our products. Our products are designed based upon currently prevailing technology to work on a variety of hardware and software platforms used by our customers. However, our software may not operate correctly on evolving versions of hardware and software platforms, programming languages, database environments and other systems that our customers use. If new technologies emerge that are incompatible with our products, or if competing products emerge that are based on new technologies or new industry standards and that perform better or cost less than our products, our key products could become obsolete and our existing and potential customers could seek alternatives to our products. We must constantly modify and improve our products to keep pace with changes made to these platforms and to database systems and other back-office applications and Internet-related applications. For example, our analytics products were designed to work with databases such as Oracle and Microsoft SQL Server. Any changes to those databases, or increasing popularity of other databases, could require us to modify our analytics products, and could cause us to delay releasing future products and enhancements. Furthermore, software adapters are necessary to integrate our analytics products with other systems and data sources used by our customers. We must develop and update these adapters to reflect changes to these systems and data sources in order to maintain the functionality provided by our products. As a result, uncertainties related to the timing and nature of new product announcements, introductions or modifications by vendors of operating systems, databases, customer relationship management software, web servers and other enterprise and Internet-based applications could delay our product development, increase our product development expense or cause customers to delay evaluation, purchase and deployment of our analytics products. If we fail to modify or improve our products in response to evolving industry standards, our products could rapidly become obsolete.

We license third party software that we incorporate into our products. These licenses may not continue to be available on commercially reasonable terms or at all. Some of this technology would be difficult to replace. The loss of any such license could result in delays or reductions of our applications until we identify, license and integrate or develop equivalent software. If we are required to enter into license agreements with third parties for replacement technology, we could face higher royalty payments and our products may lose certain attributes or features. In the future, we might need to license other software to enhance our products and meet evolving customer needs. If we are unable to do this, we could experience reduced demand for our products.

To be competitive, we must develop and introduce on a timely basis new products and product enhancements for companies with significant e-business customer interactions needs. Our ability to deliver competitive products may be negatively affected by the diversion of resources to development of our suite of products, and responding to changes in competitive products and in the demands of our customers. If we experience product delays in the future, we may face:

• customer dissatisfaction;
• cancellation of orders and license agreements;
• negative publicity;
• loss of revenues;
• slower market acceptance; and
• legal action by customers.

Furthermore, delays in bringing to market new products or their enhancements, or the existence of defects in new products or their enhancements, could be exploited by our competitors. The development of new products in response to these risks would require us to commit a substantial investment of resources, and we might not be able to develop or introduce new products on a timely or cost-effective basis, or at all, which could lead potential customers to choose alternative products.

Our success and ability to compete depend to a significant degree upon the protection of our software and other proprietary technology rights. We regard the protection of patentable inventions as important to our future opportunities. We currently have one issued U.S. patent and multiple U.S. patent applications pending relating to our software. Although we have filed international patent applications corresponding to some of our U.S. patent applications, none of our technology is patented outside of the United States. It is possible that:

• our pending patent applications may not result in the issuance of patents;
• any issued patents may not be broad enough to protect our proprietary rights;
• any issued patents could be successfully challenged by one or more third parties, which could result in our loss of the right to prevent others from exploiting the inventions claimed in those patents;
• current and future competitors may independently develop similar technology, duplicate our products or design around any of our patents; and
• effective patent protection may not be available in every country in which we do business.

We also rely on a combination of laws, such as copyright, trademark and trade secret laws, and contractual restrictions, such as confidentiality agreements and licenses, to establish and protect our proprietary rights. However, despite the precautions that we have taken:

• laws and contractual restrictions may not be sufficient to prevent misappropriation of our technology or deter others from developing similar technologies;
• current federal laws that prohibit software copying provide only limited protection from software "pirates," and effective trademark, copyright and trade secret protection may be unavailable or limited in foreign countries;
• other companies may claim common law trademark rights based upon state or foreign laws that precede the federal registration of our marks; and
• policing unauthorized use of our products and trademarks is difficult, expensive and time-consuming, and we may be unable to determine the extent of this unauthorized use.

Also, the laws of other countries in which we market our products may offer little or no effective protection of our proprietary technology. Reverse engineering, unauthorized copying or other misappropriation of our proprietary technology could enable third parties to benefit from our technology without paying us for it, which would significantly harm our business.

Substantial litigation regarding intellectual property rights exists in our industry. We expect that software in our industry may be increasingly subject to third-party infringement claims as the number of competitors grows and the functionality of products in different industry segments overlaps. Third parties may currently have, or may eventually be issued, patents upon which our current or future products or technology infringe. Any of these third parties might make a claim of infringement against us. For example, we have been contacted by a company that has asked us to evaluate the need for a license of certain patents that this company holds, relating to certain call-center applications. Although the patent holder has not filed any claims against us, we cannot assure you that it will not do so in the future. The patent holder may also have applications on file in the United States covering related subject matter, which are confidential until the patent or patents, if any, are issued. Many of our software license agreements require us to indemnify our customers from any claim or finding of intellectual property infringement. Any litigation, brought by others, or us could result in the expenditure of significant financial resources and the diversion of management's time and efforts. In addition, litigation in which we are accused of infringement might cause product shipment delays, require us to develop non-infringing technology or require us to enter into royalty or license agreements, which might not be available on acceptable terms, or at all. If a successful claim of infringement were made against us and we could not develop non-infringing technology or license the infringed or similar technology on a timely and cost-effective basis, our business could be significantly harmed.

We face the possibility of higher costs as a result of the complexity of our products and the potential for undetected errors. Due to the mission- critical nature of many of our products and services, errors are of particular concern. In the past, we have discovered software errors in some of our products after their introduction. We have only a few "beta" customers that test new features and functionality of our software before we make these features and functionalities generally available to our customers. If we are not able to detect and correct errors in our products or releases before commencing commercial shipments, we could face:

• loss of or delay in revenues expected from the new product and an immediate and significant loss of market share;
• loss of existing customers that upgrade to the new product and of new customers;
• failure to achieve market acceptance;
• diversion of development resources;
• injury to our reputation;
• increased service and warranty costs;
• legal actions by customers; and
• increased insurance costs.

Our licenses with customers generally contain provisions designed to limit our exposure to potential product liability claims, such as disclaimers of warranties and limitations on liability for special, consequential and incidental damages. In addition, our license agreements generally cap the amounts recoverable for damages to the amounts paid by the licensee to us for the product or service giving rise to the damages. However, all domestic and international jurisdictions may not enforce these contractual limitations on liability. We may be subject to claims based on errors in our software or mistakes in performing our services including claims relating to damages to our customers' internal systems. A product liability claim could divert the attention of management and key personnel, could be expensive to defend and could result in adverse settlements and judgments.

In April 2001, Office Depot, Inc. filed a complaint against KANA claiming that KANA has breached its license agreement with Office Depot. Office Depot is seeking relief in the form of a refund of license fees and maintenance fees paid to KANA, attorneys' fees and costs. The litigation is currently in its early stages. We intend to defend this claim vigorously and do not expect it to have a material impact on our results of operations and cash flow. However, the ultimate outcome of any litigation is uncertain, and either unfavorable or favorable outcomes could have a material negative impact on the results from operations, consolidated balance sheet and cash flows, due to defense costs, diversion of management resources and other factors.

Sales outside North America represented 17% of our total revenues in 2000, 16% of our total revenues in the 2001, and 33% of our revenues in the first half of 2002. We have established offices in the United Kingdom, Germany, Japan, Holland, France, Austria, Belgium, Australia, Hong Kong and South Korea. Sales outside North America could increase as a percentage of total revenues as we attempt to expand our international operations. Any expansion of our existing international operations and entry into additional international markets will require significant management attention and financial resources, as well as additional support personnel. For any such expansion, we will also need to, among other things expand our international sales channel management and support organizations and develop relationships with international service providers and additional distributors and system integrators. In addition, as international operations become a larger part of our business, we could encounter, on average, greater difficulty with collecting accounts receivable, longer sales cycles and collection periods, greater seasonal reductions in business activity and increases in our tax rates. Furthermore, products must be localized, or customized to meet the needs of local users, before they can be sold in particular foreign countries. Developing localized versions of our products for foreign markets is difficult and can take longer than we anticipate. We have only licensed our products internationally since January 1999 and have limited experience in developing localized versions of our software and marketing and distributing them internationally. Our investments in establishing facilities in other countries may not produce desired levels of revenues. Even if we are able to expand our international operations successfully, we may not be able to maintain or increase international market demand for our products.

Our international operations increase our exposure to international laws and regulations. If we cannot comply with foreign laws and regulations, which are often complex and subject to variation and unexpected changes, we could incur unexpected costs and potential litigation. For example, the governments of foreign countries might attempt to regulate our products and services or levy sales or other taxes relating to our activities. In addition, foreign countries may impose tariffs, duties, price controls or other restrictions on foreign currencies or trade barriers, any of which could make it more difficult for us to conduct our business. The European Union has enacted its own privacy regulations that may result in limits on the collection and use of certain user information, which, if applied to the sale of our products and services, could negatively impact our results of operations.

Our international revenues and expenses are denominated in local currency. Therefore, a weakening of other currencies compared to the U.S. dollar could make our products less competitive in foreign markets and could negatively affect our operating results and cash flows. We do not currently engage in currency hedging activities. We have not yet experienced, but may in the future experience, significant foreign currency transaction losses, especially because we do not engage in currency hedging.

In the future, we may be required to seek additional financing to fund our operations or growth. Factors such as the commercial success of our existing products and services, the timing and success of any new products and services, the progress of our research and development efforts, our results of operations, the status of competitive products and services, and the timing and success of potential strategic alliances or potential opportunities to acquire or sell technologies or assets may require us to seek additional funding sooner than we expect. In the event that we require additional cash, we may not be able to secure additional financing on terms that are acceptable to us, especially in the uncertain market climate, and we may not be successful in implementing or negotiating such other arrangements to improve our cash position. If we raise additional funds through the issuance of equity or convertible debt securities, the percentage ownership of our stockholders would be reduced and the securities we issue might have rights, preferences and privileges senior to those of our current stockholders. If adequate funds were not available on acceptable terms, our ability to achieve or sustain positive cash flows, maintain current operations, fund any potential expansion, take advantage of unanticipated opportunities, develop or enhance products or services, or otherwise respond to competitive pressures would be significantly limited.

If we are presented with appropriate opportunities, we may make other investments in complementary companies, products or technologies. We may not realize the anticipated benefits of any other acquisition or investment. If we acquire another company, we will likely face risks, uncertainties and disruptions associated with the integration process, including, among other things, difficulties in the integration of the operations, technologies and services of the acquired company, the diversion of our management's attention from other business concerns and the potential loss of key employees of the acquired businesses. If we fail to successfully integrate other companies that we may acquire, our business could be harmed. Furthermore, we may have to incur debt or issue equity securities to pay for any additional future acquisitions or investments, the issuance of which could be dilutive to our existing stockholders or us. In addition, our operating results may suffer because of acquisition-related costs or amortization expenses or charges relating to acquired goodwill and other intangible assets.

In the past, acquisitions have been an important part of the growth strategy for us. To gain access to key technologies, new products and broader customer bases, we have acquired companies in exchange for shares of our common stock. Because the recent trading prices of our common stock have been significantly lower than in the past, the role of acquisitions in our growth may be substantially limited. If we are unable to acquire companies in exchange for our common stock, we may not have access to new customers, needed technological advances or new products and enhancements to existing products. This would substantially impair our ability to respond to market opportunities.

Our board of directors has the authority to issue up to 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock. Without any further vote or action on the part of the stockholders, the board of directors has the authority to determine the price, rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions of the preferred stock. This preferred stock, if issued, might have preference over and harm the rights of the holders of common stock. Although the issuance of this preferred stock will provide us with flexibility in connection with possible acquisitions and other corporate purposes, this issuance may make it more difficult for a third party to acquire a majority of our outstanding voting stock. We currently have no plans to issue preferred stock.

Our certificate of incorporation, bylaws and equity compensation plans include provisions that may deter an unsolicited offer to purchase us. These provisions, coupled with the provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law, may delay or impede a merger, tender offer or proxy contest involving us. Furthermore, our board of directors is divided into three classes, only one of which is elected each year. Directors are removable by the affirmative vote of at least 66 2/3% of all classes of voting stock. These factors may further delay or prevent a change of control of us.

We sell our products and services primarily to organizations that receive large volumes of e-mail and Web-based communications. Consequently, our future revenues and profits, if any, substantially depend upon the continued acceptance and use of the Internet and e-mail, which are evolving as media of communication. Rapid growth in the use of the Internet and e-mail is a recent phenomenon and may not continue. As a result, a broad base of enterprises that use e-mail as a primary means of communication may not develop or be maintained. In addition, the market may not accept recently introduced products and services that process e-mail, including our products and services. Moreover, companies that have already invested significant resources in other methods of communications with customers, such as call centers, may be reluctant to adopt a new strategy that may limit or compete with their existing investments.

Consumers and businesses might reject the Internet as a viable commercial medium, or be slow to adopt it, for a number of reasons, including potentially inadequate network infrastructure, slow development of enabling technologies, concerns about the security of transactions and confidential information and insufficient commercial support. The Internet infrastructure may not be able to support the demands placed on it by increased Internet usage and bandwidth requirements. In addition, delays in the development or adoption of new standards and protocols required to handle increased levels of Internet activity, or increased governmental regulation, could cause the Internet to lose its viability as a commercial medium. If these or any other factors cause use of the Internet for business to decline or develop more slowly than expected, demand for our products and services will be reduced. Even if the required infrastructure, standards, protocols or complementary products, services or facilities are developed, we might incur substantial expenses adapting our products to changing or emerging technologies.

State, federal and foreign regulators could adopt laws and regulations that impose additional burdens on companies that conduct business online. These laws and regulations could discourage communication by e-mail or other web-based communications, particularly targeted e-mail of the type facilitated by our products, which could reduce demand for our products and services.

The growth and development of the market for online services may prompt calls for more stringent consumer protection laws or laws that may inhibit the use of Internet-based communications or the information contained in these communications. The adoption of any additional laws or regulations may decrease the expansion of the Internet. A decline in the growth of the Internet, particularly as it relates to online communication, could decrease demand for our products and services and increase our costs of doing business, or otherwise harm our business. Any new legislation or regulations, application of laws and regulations from jurisdictions whose laws do not currently apply to our business, or application of existing laws and regulations to the Internet and other online services could increase our costs and harm our growth.

The imposition of sales and other taxes on products sold by our customers over the Internet could have a negative effect on online commerce and the demand for our products and services.

The imposition of new sales or other taxes could limit the growth of Internet commerce generally and, as a result, the demand for our products and services. Recent federal legislation limits the imposition of state and local taxes on Internet-related sales until November 1, 2003. Congress may choose not to renew this legislation, in which case state and local governments would be free to impose taxes on electronically purchased goods. We believe that most companies that sell products over the Internet do not currently collect sales or other taxes on shipments of their products into states or foreign countries where they are not physically present. However, one or more states or foreign countries may seek to impose sales or other tax collection obligations on out-of-jurisdiction companies that engage in e-commerce within their jurisdiction. A successful assertion by one or more states or foreign countries that companies that engage in e-commerce within their jurisdiction should collect sales or other taxes on the sale of their products over the Internet, even though not physically in the state or country, could indirectly reduce demand for our products.

Businesses using our products capture information regarding their customers when those customers contact them on-line with customer service inquiries. Privacy concerns could cause visitors to resist providing the personal data necessary to allow our customers to use our software products most effectively. More importantly, even the perception of privacy concerns, whether or not valid, may indirectly inhibit market acceptance of our products. In addition, legislative or regulatory requirements may heighten these concerns if businesses must notify Web site users that the data captured after visiting certain Web sites may be used by marketing entities to unilaterally direct product promotion and advertising to that user. If consumer privacy concerns are not adequately resolved, our business could be harmed. Government regulation that limits our customers' use of this information could reduce the demand for our products. A number of jurisdictions have adopted, or are considering adopting, laws that restrict the use of customer information from Internet applications. The European Union has required that its member states adopt legislation that imposes restrictions on the collection and use of personal data, and that limits the transfer of personally-identifiable data to countries that do not impose equivalent restrictions. In the United States, the Childrens' Online Privacy Protection Act was enacted in October 1998. This legislation directs the Federal Trade Commission to regulate the collection of data from children on commercial websites. In addition, the Federal Trade Commission has begun investigations into the privacy practices of businesses that collect information on the Internet. These and other privacy-related initiatives could reduce demand for some of the Internet applications with which our products operate, and could restrict the use of these products in some e-commerce applications. This could, in turn, reduce demand for these products.

We must protect our computer systems and network from physical break-ins, security breaches and other disruptive problems caused by the Internet or other users. Computer break-ins could jeopardize the security of information stored in and transmitted through our computer systems and network, which could adversely affect our ability to retain or attract customers, damage our reputation and subject us to litigation. We have been in the past, and could be in the future, subject to denial of service, vandalism and other attacks on our systems by Internet hackers. Although we intend to continue to implement security technology and establish operational procedures to prevent break-ins, damage and failures, these security measures may fail. Our insurance coverage in certain circumstances may be insufficient to cover losses that may result from such events.

Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to our investment portfolio. The primary objective of our investment activities is to preserve principal while at the same time maximizing yields without significantly increasing risk. At June 30, 2002, our portfolio included money market funds, commercial paper, municipal bonds, government agency bonds, and corporate bonds. The diversity of the portfolio helps us to achieve our investment objective. At June 30, 2002, the weighted average maturity of our portfolio was 122 days.

We are exposed to market risk from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. We manage exposure to variability in foreign currency exchange rates primarily through the use of natural hedges, as both liabilities and assets are denominated in the local currency. However, different durations in our funding obligations and assets may expose us to the risk of foreign exchange rate fluctuations. We have not entered into any derivative instrument transactions to manage this risk. Based on our overall foreign currency rate exposure at June 30, 2002, we do not believe that a hypothetical 10% change in foreign currency rates would materially adversely affect our financial position.

We develop products in the United States and sell these products in North America, Europe, Asia, Australia and Latin America. Generally, our sales and expenses are incurred in local currency. At June 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001, our primary net foreign currency market exposures were in Japanese Yen, Euros and British Pounds. As a result, our financial results could be affected by factors such as changes in foreign currency exchange rates or weak economic conditions in foreign markets.

Foreign currency rate fluctuations can impact the U.S. Dollar translation of our foreign operations in our consolidated financial statements. To date, these fluctuations have not been material to our operating results.

In April 2001, Office Depot, Inc. filed a complaint against KANA claiming that KANA has breached its license agreement with Office Depot. Office Depot is seeking relief in the form of a refund of license fees and maintenance fees paid to KANA, attorneys' fees and costs. We intend to defend this claim vigorously and do not expect it to have a material impact on our results of operations or cash flow.

The underwriters for our initial public offering, Goldman Sachs & Co., Lehman Bros, Hambrecht & Quist LLC, Wit Capital Corp as well as the Company and certain current and former officers of the Company have been named as defendants in federal securities class action lawsuits filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The cases allege violations of Section 11, 12(a)(2) and Section 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 and violations of Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, on behalf of a class of plaintiffs who purchased the Company's stock between September 21, 1999 and December 6, 2000 in connection with the Company's initial public offering. Specifically, the complaints alleged that the underwriter defendants engaged in a scheme concerning sales of the Company 's securities in the initial public offering and in the aftermarket. The Company believes it has good defenses to these claims and intends to defend the action vigorously.

On April 16, 2002, Davox Corporation filed an action against KANA in the Superior Court, Middlesex, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, in relation to an OEM Agreement between Davox and KANA under which Davox has paid a total of approximately $1.6 million in fees, asserting breach of contract, breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, unjust enrichment, misrepresentation, and unfair trade practices. Davox seeks actual and punitive damages in an amount to be determined at trial, and award of attorneys' fees. This action is in the early stages. KANA intends to defend the matter vigorously.

The ultimate outcome of any litigation is uncertain, and either unfavorable or favorable outcomes could have a material negative impact on our results of operations, consolidated balance sheet and cash flows, due to defense costs, diversion of management resources and other factors.

Item 2. Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds.

Not applicable.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

Not applicable.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

An Annual Meeting of Stockholders was held on June 18, 2001 to act on the following matters: P>An Annual Meeting of Stockholders was held on June 18, 2001 to act on the following matters:

1. The election of two Class III directors of KANA, to serve until our 2005 annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors have been elected and qualified or until their earlier resignation, death or removal. The votes cast for and withheld from Chuck Bay were 15,480,818 and 1,023,191, respectively. The votes cast for and withheld from James C. Wood were 16,292,181 and 211,828, respectively.

2. A proposal to ratify the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent auditors for 2002. The votes cast for and against this action were 16,390,768 and 102,876, respectively, with 10,365 votes abstaining.

Based on the voting results, each of these actions was approved and the nominated directors were elected to the board.

Item 5. Other Information.

Not applicable.