Back to GetFilings.com

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

[X]       QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarter ended June 30, 2003

OR

[   ]   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ____________ to ______________.

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 000-26489

ENCORE CAPITAL GROUP, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(877) 445 – 4581
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

(Not Applicable)
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year,
if changed since last report)

_________________

     There were 7,434,633 shares of common stock outstanding as of August 12, 2003.

ENCORE CAPITAL GROUP, INC.

INDEX TO FORM 10-Q

Index

1

Index

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements

ENCORE CAPITAL GROUP, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition
(In Thousands, Except Par Value Amounts)

(A)         Derived from the audited consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2002.
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

2

Index

ENCORE CAPITAL GROUP, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
(Unaudited)

        See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

3

Index

ENCORE CAPITAL GROUP, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited, In Thousands)

        See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

4

ENCORE CAPITAL GROUP, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (cont.)

Reconciliation of Net Income to Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
(Unaudited, In Thousands)

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

5

Index

ENCORE CAPITAL GROUP, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity
(Unaudited, In Thousands)

        See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

6

Index

ENCORE CAPITAL GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

Note 1: Business and Basis of Presentation

Business

Encore Capital Group, Inc. (“Encore”or the “Company”), previously known as MCM Capital Group, Inc., is a systems-driven purchaser and manager of charged-off consumer receivables portfolios. The Company acquires these portfolios at deep discounts from their face values using its proprietary valuation process which is based on the consumer attributes of the underlying accounts. Based upon the Company’s ongoing analysis of these accounts, it employs a dynamic mix of collection strategies to maximize its return on investment. The Company is a Delaware holding company whose principal assets are its investments in its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Midland Credit Management, Inc. (“Midland Credit”), Midland Funding 98-A Corporation (“98-A”), Midland Receivables 99-1 Corporation (“99-1”), Midland Acquisition Corporation, MRC Receivables Corporation (“MRC”), and Midland Funding NCC-1 Corporation (“NCC-1”) (collectively referred to herein as the “Company”). Encore also has a wholly-owned subsidiary, Midland Receivables 98-1 Corporation, which is not consolidated, but is recorded as an investment in retained interest on the accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated statement of financial condition. The receivable portfolios consist primarily of charged-off domestic consumer credit card receivables purchased from national financial institutions, major retail credit corporations, and resellers of such portfolios. Acquisitions of receivable portfolios are financed by operations and by borrowings from third parties (see Note 8).

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission and, therefore, do not include all information and footnotes necessary for a fair presentation of financial position, results of operations and cash flows in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In the opinion of the Company, however, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the Company’s consolidated financial position as of June 30, 2003, its consolidated results of operations for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, and its cash flows for the six- month periods ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The consolidated results of operations of the Company for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2003 may not be indicative of future results. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K as of and for the year ended December 31, 2002 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 28, 2003.

Certain amounts included in the accompanying prior periods’ consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.

7

Significant Accounting Policies

Please refer to the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K as of and for the year ended December 31, 2002 for a summary of the Company’s significant accounting policies.

Pro forma effect of stock based compensation

Pro forma information regarding net income and earnings per share is required by SFAS No. 123 and has been determined as if the Company had accounted for stock option grants under the fair-value method of SFAS No. 123. The fair value for options granted was estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2003 and 2002:

The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options, which have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions including the expected stock price volatility. Because the Company’s employee stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management’s opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of the Company’s stock options granted to its employees.

8

For purposes of pro forma disclosure, the estimated fair value of the options is amortized to expense over the options’ vesting period. The Company’s pro forma information for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 were as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):

Note 2: New Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure – an Amendment to SFAS No. 123.” SFAS No. 148 provides alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method on accounting for stock-based employee compensation. The Company has retained its accounting for stock based employee compensation under APB No. 25 and has only adopted the pro forma disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123. Accordingly, the implementation of SFAS No. 148 did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46 (“FIN 46”), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities.” The adoption of FIN 46 did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements of the Company.

In April 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 149, “Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” which amends and clarifies financial accounting and reporting for derivative instruments. The implementation of SFAS No. 149 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity,” which establishes standards for the classification and measurement of certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liability and equity. This statement is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise is effective for the Company on July 1, 2003. The Company does expect the adoption of SFAS No. 150 to have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.

9

Note 3: Litigation Settlement

On March 21, 2003, Midland Credit, 98-A and 99-1 entered into a settlement agreement with MBNA America Bank, N.A. (“MBNA”) in connection with the lawsuit filed against MBNA in February 2001. Pursuant to the terms of the settlement (the “Litigation Settlement”), MBNA paid Midland Credit $11.1 million on April 4, 2003 in full and complete satisfaction of the claims. The net proceeds of $7.9 million, which is net of litigation expenses and attorneys’ fees, were used to repay holders of the Warehouse Facility and Securitization 99-1 (see Notes 6 and 8).

During the first quarter of 2003, the Company recorded a net gain of $7.2 million, which was comprised of the net proceeds of $7.9 million, reduced by the remaining carrying value of the related receivable portfolios as of March 31, 2003, which was $0.7 million (see Note 5).

Note 4: Sale of Convertible Preferred Stock and Forgiveness of Debt

On February 22, 2002, certain existing stockholders and their affiliates (the “Purchasers”) made a $5.0 million investment in Encore Capital Group, Inc. Immediately prior to such investment, the Purchasers beneficially owned in excess of 50% of the Company’s common stock on a collective basis. In a related transaction, one of the Company’s principal lenders, ING Capital LLC (“ING”), forgave $5.3 million of outstanding debt and reduced its warrant position by 200,000 warrants. The debt forgiveness was recorded net of the debt discount related to the warrants cancelled and deferred loan costs totaling $0.6 million in the aggregate. The net $4.7 million effect of the debt forgiveness was recorded by the Company as a capital contribution since it was facilitated by various equity holders of the Company through their relationship with ING. This relationship resulted from prior investment banking and financial advisory services rendered to such equity holders by ING and its affiliates. These two transactions increased the Company’s net worth by $9.3 million in 2002.

The Purchasers received 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s Series A Senior Cumulative Participating Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series A Preferred Stock”) at a price of $5.00 per share for $5.0 million in cash. The Company received $5.0 million less $0.4 million of costs associated with the issuance. Each share of Series A Preferred Stock is convertible at the option of the holder, at any time, into 10 shares of common stock at a conversion price of $0.50 per share of common stock, subject to customary anti-dilution adjustments. The Series A Preferred Stock has a cumulative dividend, payable semi-annually. Until February 15, 2004, dividends are payable in cash and/or additional Series A Preferred Stock, at the Company’s option, at the rate of 10.0% per annum. Thereafter, dividends will be payable only in cash, at a rate of 10.0% per annum. The dividends payable on August 15, 2002 and February 15, 2003 were paid in cash. The dividend rate increases to 15.0% per annum in the event of a qualified public offering, a change of control (each as defined) or the sale of all, or substantially all, of the assets of the Company. In the event dividends are not declared or paid, the dividends will accumulate on a compounded basis. The Series A Preferred Stock has a liquidation preference equal to the sum of the stated value of the Series A Preferred Stock ($5.0 million in the aggregate) plus all accrued and unpaid dividends thereon plus a participation payment equal to the value of the shares of common stock at the conversion price and/or such other consideration that would be payable to holders of the Series A Preferred Stock if their shares had been converted into shares of the Company’s common stock immediately prior to the liquidation event ($88.0 million as of June 30, 2003). This liquidation payout provision applies both to true liquidations as well as sales of the Company, as defined.

10

Note 5: Investment in Receivable Portfolios, Net

The Company accounts for its investment in receivables portfolios on the“accrual basis” or “cost recovery method” of accounting in accordance with the provisions of the AICPA’s Practice Bulletin 6, “Amortization of Discounts on Certain Acquired Loans.” Static pools are established with accounts having similar attributes, based on the specific seller and timing of acquisition. Once a static pool is established, the receivables are permanently assigned to the pool. The discount (i.e., the difference between the cost of each static pool and the related aggregate contractual receivable balance) is not recorded because the Company expects to collect a relatively small percentage of each static pool’s contractual receivable balance. As a result, receivables portfolios are recorded at cost at the time of acquisition.

The Company accounts for each static pool as a unit for the economic life of the pool (similar to one loan) for recognition of revenue from receivables portfolios, for collections applied to principal of receivables portfolios and for provision for loss or impairment. Revenue from receivables portfolios is accrued based on the effective interest rate determined for each pool applied to each pool’s original cost basis, as increased for revenue earned and decreased for principal paydowns and impairments. The effective interest rate is the internal rate of return determined based on the timing and amounts of actual cash received and anticipated future cash flow projections for each pool.

The Company monitors and evaluates actual and projected cash flows for each receivable portfolio on a quarterly basis. Through June 30, 2003, the Company has not increased the forecasted cash flows for any receivable portfolio in which actual cumulative collections have exceeded forecast. The Company has, on the other hand, reduced the total forecasted cash flows on certain receivable portfolios where actual cumulative collections to date have not met the forecast. If the remaining forecasted cash flows are in excess of the remaining carrying value, the effective interest is reduced prospectively. If the remaining forecasted cash flows are less than the remaining carrying value, the receivable portfolio is impaired and all of the remaining collections are subsequently applied against book value. At June 30, 2003, five portfolios with a remaining carrying value of $1.1 million were accounted for using the cost recovery method by the Company, including two portfolios that were changed to the cost recovery method during the six-month period ended June 30, 2003. No provision for impairment losses was recorded during either of the six-month periods ended June 30, 2003 or 2002.

11

On purchases made since mid-2000, the Company's collections, in the aggregate, have exceeded its expectations. As a result, the Company is currently in the process of updating its model to estimate the impact of its new collection strategies on the forecasted remaining cash flows of its receivable portfolios. This model will consider all the known data about its accounts, including, among others, its collection experience, changes in external customer factors in addition to all data known when the Company acquired the accounts. It is the Company’s expectation that the results of this model will be implemented during the fourth quarter of 2003 or the first quarter of 2004; however, prior to implementation, substantial validation procedures will be required. Accordingly, the implementation of this model may take more time. The resulting increases or decreases of forecasted cash flows as a result of applying this model, if any, will have a corresponding increase or decrease to our effective interest rates.

Collections realized after the net book value of a portfolio has been fully recovered are recorded as revenue (“Zero Basis Income”). During the six-month periods ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, approximately $5.8 million and $2.3 million, respectively, was recognized as revenue pertaining to collections on portfolios for which the related net book value has been fully recovered.

The following tables summarize the changes in the balance of the investment in receivable portfolios during the following periods (in thousands):

12

The annualized weighted average effective interest rate for receivable portfolios on the accretion method was 155.2% for the six-month period ended June 30, 2003, compared to 142.3% for the six-month period ended June 30, 2002.

Beginning in 2001, the Company began purchasing charged-off unsecured consumer loans and auto loan deficiencies. The Company purchased $2.7 million and $1.5 million of these loans during the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Collections related to all portfolios of charged-off unsecured consumer loans and auto deficiencies amounted to $1.6 million and $1.2 million for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

The Company currently utilizes various business channels for the collection of charged-off credit cards and other receivables. The following table summarizes the collections by collection channel (in thousands):

Note 6: Securitization of Receivable Portfolios

1999 Warehouse and 1999 Securitization Financing

In March of 1999, and January of 2000, the Company entered into two securitized receivable acquisition facilities through two bankruptcy remote, special purpose subsidiaries, Midland Funding 98-A Corporation and Midland Receivables 99-1 Corporation, respectively. Midland Funding 98-A Corporation entered into a $35 million facility (the “Warehouse Facility”), structured as a term loan bearing interest at 1.17% plus the one-week London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”). Midland Receivables 99-1 Corporation, issued securitized non-recourse notes in the amount of $28.9 million (“Securitization 99-1”), bearing interest at 10% per annum. The Warehouse Facility and Securitization 99-1 were collateralized and cross-collateralized by certain charged-off receivables and were insured through a financial guaranty insurance policy.

13

On April 15, 2003, all obligations related to the Warehouse Facility and Securitization 99-1 were repaid in full. This included payment of the respective debt balances of $5.0 million and $4.6 million for the Warehouse Facility and Securitization 99-1, respectively, and the combined deferred insurance premiums of $1.9 million. The funds to repay these liabilities came from the Litigation Settlement (see Note 3), funds held in related reserve accounts and other internal cash sources. As a result of the payment in full of all obligations related to the Warehouse Facility and Securitization 99-1, the Company now receives 100% of future collections from the related portfolios.

1998 Securitization/Sale

On September 11, 2000, Midland Receivables 98-1 Corporation, a bankruptcy-remote, special-purpose subsidiary of Midland Credit, repaid non-recourse notes originally issued in the principal amount of $33.0 million in 1998. In connection with this securitization transaction, the Company recorded a retained interest in securitized receivables. The retained interest was originally recorded at fair value, with the difference between fair value and cost basis recorded as unrealized gain and included in accumulated other comprehensive income as a component of stockholders’ equity. In accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force Consensus No. 99-20, “Recognition of Interest Income and Impairment on Purchased and Retained Beneficial Interests in Securitized Financial Assets,” the retained interest is carried at cost; is increased by interest accretion based on estimated future cash receipts; is decreased by actual cash collections; and the unrealized gain is amortized using an effective interest method.

Once each quarter, the Company monitors the retained interest for impairment based on discounted anticipated future cash flows of the underlying receivables as compared to the current carrying value (original cost basis adjusted for interest earned and principal pay downs) of the retained interest. During the first quarter of 2003, the Company lowered its expected yield on the retained interest from an annual return of approximately 44.4% to 7.2% based on estimated net cash flows derived from both historical and projected collections. The income accrued on the retained interest was $0.2 million and $3.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

Provisions for losses are charged to earnings when it is determined that the retained interest’s carrying value is greater than the present value of expected future cash flows. No provision for loss has ever been recorded for the retained interest.

14

The following summarizes the changes in the balance of the investment in retained interest (in thousands):

Note 7: Property and Equipment

The following is a summary of the components of property and equipment (in thousands):

15

Note 8: Notes Payable and Other Borrowings

The Company is obligated under borrowings as follows (in thousands):

Revolving Line of Credit

The Company entered into the Seventh Amended and Restated Promissory Note effective April 10, 2003 to renew the Company’s revolving line of credit. The revolving line of credit has been reduced from $15.0 million to $5.0 million, carries interest at the Prime Rate, as defined, and matures on April 15, 2004. Certain stockholders of Encore, including Triarc Companies, Inc. (“Triarc”), have guaranteed this unsecured revolving line of credit. In connection with the guaranty, an aggregate fee of $75,000 per quarter will be paid to such guarantors. At June 30, 2003, the Company had $5.0 million available under this facility.

Senior Notes

In January 2000, the Company obtained financing through the issuance of $10.0 million principal amount senior notes to an institutional investor (“The Senior Notes”). The notes are unsecured obligations of the Company, but are guaranteed by Midland Credit and Triarc. In connection with the issuance of the notes, the Company issued warrants to the note holders and Triarc to acquire up to an aggregate of 528,571 shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $0.01 per share (see Note 12). The Senior Notes require semi-annual interest payments on January 15 and July 15.

On February 22, 2002, the institutional investor forgave $5.3 million of outstanding debt, consisting of a $2.8 million reduction in the original note balance, the forgiveness of $1.9 million in Payment-in-Kind Notes, and the forgiveness of $0.6 million in interest accrued through December 31, 2001, and reduced its warrant position by 200,000 warrants (see Note 4). In conjunction with the debt forgiveness, capitalized loan costs totaling $0.1 million and debt discount totaling $0.5 million were written-off. The net gain on debt forgiveness totaling $4.7 million was reflected as an adjustment to stockholders’ equity. Furthermore, the terms of the Senior Notes and Payment-in-Kind Notes were revised. The remaining $7.3 million in Senior Notes now bear interest at 6.0% per annum until July 15, 2003, and will bear interest at 8.0% per annum from July 16, 2003 to January 15, 2007, when the entire unpaid amount is due.

16

Secured Financing Facility

On December 20, 2000, MRC Receivables Corporation, a wholly-owned bankruptcy-remote, special-purpose entity, entered into a $75.0 million secured financing facility (the “Secured Financing Facility”), which expires on December 31, 2004. The Secured Financing Facility generally provides for a 90% advance rate with respect to each qualified receivable portfolio purchased. Interest accrues at the prime rate plus 3.0% per annum and is payable weekly. The interest rate reduces by 1.0% on outstanding amounts in excess of $25.0 million. Notes to be issued under the facility are collateralized by the charged-off credit card receivables that are purchased with the proceeds from this financing arrangement. Each note has a maturity date not to exceed 27 months after the borrowing date. Once the notes are repaid and the Company has been repaid its investment, the Company and the lender share the residual cash flows from the receivable portfolios, net of servicing fees. The sharing in residual cash flows continues for the entire economic life of the receivable portfolios financed using this facility, and will extend substantially beyond the expiration date of the Secured Financing Facility, which is December 31, 2004. The Company is required to give the lender the opportunity to fund all of its purchases of charged-off credit card receivables with advances on the Secured Financing Facility.

As of June 30, 2003, from the inception of the Secured Financing Facility, the Company had purchased charged-off receivable portfolios with a face value of $5.9 billion at a purchase price of approximately $143.3 million or an average cost of 2.44% of face value. During the six months ended June 30, 2003 and June 30, 2002, the Company recorded $7.0 million and $5.0 million, respectively, in contingent interest expense relating to the residual cash flow sharing agreement. Total cash payments made related to the contingent interest were $7.1 million during the six months ended June 30, 2003, and $0.5 million during the six months ended June 30, 2002. The Secured Financing Facility is collateralized by certain charged-off receivable portfolios with an aggregate carrying amount of $72.0 million at June 30, 2003. The assets pledged under this financing facility, together with their associated cash flows, would not be available to satisfy claims of general creditors of the Company.

In conjunction with the Secured Financing Facility, the Company issued warrants to purchase up to 621,576 shares of Encore’s common stock at $1.00 per share subject to customary anti-dilution adjustments. Of the warrants issued, 155,394 were exercisable immediately, and the remaining warrants became exercisable in three equal tranches triggered at the time the Company had drawn an aggregate of $22.5 million, $45.0 million and $67.5 million against the facility, respectively. The first tranche was triggered during 2001, the second tranche was triggered in the first quarter of 2002, and the final tranche was triggered in the third quarter of 2002. Accordingly, warrants representing 621,576 shares of the Company’s common stock were exercisable under this facility at December 31, 2002 and June 30, 2003.

17

Note 9: Income Taxes

The provision for income tax expense for the six-month period ended June 30, 2003, reflects tax expense at an effective rate of 40.1%. This consists primarily of a provision for Federal income taxes of 32.0% (which is net of a benefit for state income taxes of 2.0%), a provision for state income taxes of 8.0%, and the effect of permanent book versus tax differences. The provision for income tax expense for the six-month period ended June 30, 2002 reflects tax expense at an effective rate of 28.2%, which consisted of the deferred tax impact of the decrease in the unrealized gain and the effect of the change in the deferred tax asset valuation allowance which was in existence during such period.

The Company had Federal, Arizona state, and California state net operating loss carry-forwards of approximately $14.1 million, $4.9 million and $3.2 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2002. The Company anticipates utilizing all of its Federal and Arizona state net operating loss carry-forwards during 2003. The Company is a loss corporation as defined in Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code. Therefore, if certain changes in the Company’s ownership should occur, there could be a significant annual limitation on the amount of loss carry-forwards and future recognized losses that can be utilized and ultimately some amount of loss carry-forwards may not be available. The remaining net operating losses for Federal purposes generated in 2000 and 2001 of $4.8 million and $9.2 million, respectively, expire in 2020 and 2021, respectively. The remaining net operating losses for Arizona state income tax purposes generated in 2000 and 2001 of $0.2 million and $4.7 million, respectively, expire in 2010 and 2011, respectively. The remaining net operating losses for California state income tax purposes generated in 2000 and 2001 of $0.7 million and $2.5 million, respectively, expire in 2012 and 2013, respectively. Utilization of California net operating losses has been suspended by the State of California until 2004.

SFAS No. 109 requires a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets if, based on available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. As of June 30, 2002, the Company continued to believe that some uncertainty existed with respect to the future utilization of net operating losses and other deferred tax assets; therefore, the Company provided a full valuation allowance relating to such items arising in 2002. As of June 30, 2002, net deferred tax assets were zero after the application of the valuation allowance. During the fourth quarter of 2002, the Company determined that the utilization of net operating losses and other deferred tax assets were more likely than not, and therefore removed all but $0.2 million of the valuation allowance. The change in the valuation allowance resulted in the recognition of a current tax benefit in the amount of $6.2 million in the fourth quarter of 2002.

Note 10: Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share are computed by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the reporting period. Diluted earnings per share are computed similar to basic earnings per share while giving effect to all potential dilutive common stock equivalents that were outstanding during the period.

18

The following is a reconciliation from basic earnings per share to diluted earnings per share for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2003, and 2002, respectively (in thousands, except for earnings per share):

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, 1,035,000 stock options and 466,182 stock warrants were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because of their anti-dilutive effect. All potentially dilutive common stock equivalents were included in the computation of diluted earnings per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003.

   Note 11: Stock Based Compensation

The 1999 Equity Participation Plan (“1999 Plan”), as amended, permits the grant of stock or options to employees, directors and consultants. A total of 2,600,000 shares were approved by the stockholders for issuance under the 1999 Plan. Options may be granted at prices that exceed 85% of the fair market value on the date of the grant, and expire over a term not to exceed ten years. Options generally vest ratably over a three-year period, unless otherwise determined by the Board of Directors.

In May 2003, the Company’s board of directors approved the issuance of stock options to two key employees to purchase a total of 7,500 shares of the Company's common stock at an exercise price of $4.50. The options vest ratably over three years commencing May 2004.

In April 2003, the Company’s board of directors approved the issuance of stock options to an officer to purchase 50,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $2.95 per share. The options vest ratably over three years, commencing April 2004.

19

In January 2003, the Company’s board of directors approved issuance of stock options for key personnel to purchase a total of 278,500 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $1.30 per share. The options vest ratably over three years, commencing in January 2004.

In September 2002, the Company’s board of directors approved issuance of stock options for certain executive officers of the Company to purchase a total of 624,999 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.51 per share. The options vest upon the earlier of (i) an acquisition at a price in excess of $5.00 per share by any party of 60% or more of the Company’s common and preferred stock (on an as converted and fully diluted basis) other than by the Company’s current major institutional investors or any affiliate thereof, (ii) the completion of one or more secondary public offerings at a price in excess of $5.00 per share by all Encore shareholders owning more than 10% of the Company’s common and preferred stock (on an as converted basis and fully diluted basis) as of October 24, 2002, of more than one half of each of their then current equity ownership interest (on an as converted and fully diluted basis) as of the effective date of the registration statement, or (iii) five years from the date of grant.

In July 2002, the Company’s board of directors approved issuance of stock options to an officer to purchase 50,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.52 per share. The option vests over three years with the first vesting date in July of 2003. Also, during 2002, 50,000 stock options previously issued to an officer expired upon their separation from the Company.

In January 2002, the Company’s board of directors approved issuance of stock options for key personnel to purchase a total of 161,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.35 per share. The options vest ratably over three years, commencing in January 2003.

A summary of the Company’s stock option activity and related information is as follows:

20

The following table summarizes outstanding and exercisable options at June 30, 2003:

Note 12: Common Stock Warrants

In connection with the issuance of $10.0 million of 12.0% senior notes to an institutional lender in January 2000 (see Note 7), the Company issued warrants to the lender and to Triarc to acquire 428,571 and 100,000 shares, respectively, of common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $0.01 per share. The Company also paid a fee to Triarc in the amount of $0.2 million as consideration of Triarc’s guarantee of this indebtedness. The Company engaged an independent valuation firm to determine the value of the warrants for allocation to the $10.0 million principal amount. The warrants were valued at $3.05 per share and, thus, recorded as a component of stockholders’ equity (deficit) in the amount of $1.6 million with the same amount recorded as debt discount relating to the $10.0 million note payable. The $1.6 million debt discount is being amortized as interest expense over the five-year exercise period of the warrants, resulting in a remaining debt discount balance of $0.7 million at June 30, 2003. The agreements pursuant to which the warrants were issued contain anti-dilution provisions which, during the year ended December 31, 2001, resulted in the issuance to the lender and Triarc of additional warrants to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock totaling 5,241 and 1,275, respectively, at the $0.01 per share. The anti-dilution warrants were valued at $3,000 and recorded as a component of stockholders’ equity (deficit) and as debt discount relating to the $10.0 million note payable. During 2002, the institutional lender forgave warrants to purchase 200,000 shares of the Company’s common stock (see Notes 4 and 8).

In conjunction with the Secured Financing Facility, the Company issued warrants to purchase up to 621,576 shares of Encore’s common stock at $1.00 per share subject to customary anti-dilution adjustments. Of the warrants issued, 155,394 were exercisable immediately, and the remaining warrants became exercisable in three equal tranches triggered at the time the Company had drawn an aggregate of $22.5 million, $45.0 million and $67.5 million against the facility, respectively. The first tranche was triggered in the third quarter of 2001, the second tranche was triggered in the first quarter of 2002, and the final tranche was triggered in the third quarter of 2002. Thus warrants representing 310,788, and 621,576 shares of the Company’s common stock were exercisable under this facility at December 31, 2001 and December 31, 2002, respectively. The warrants that became exercisable during 2001 were valued at $0.1 million, as were the warrants issued during 2002, and were recorded as deferred loan costs in other assets, and as a component of stockholders’ equity (deficit).

21

Effective October 31, 2000, the Company executed an agreement with certain of its affiliates for a $2.0 million stand-by working capital line of credit secured by substantially all of the Company’s assets and those of its subsidiaries. In connection with this agreement, the lenders received 250,000 warrants to acquire the Company’s common stock at $0.01 per share. As of December 31, 2001, when the stand-by line expired, no indebtedness existed. The fair value of the warrants, $0.1 million, was accounted for by recording deferred loan costs with an offset to additional paid-in capital as a component of stockholders’ equity. All 250,000 warrants were exercised on April 16, 2002.

The following table summarizes outstanding and exercisable common stock warrants at June 30, 2003:

Note 13: Commitments and Contingencies

Litigation

The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”) and comparable state statutes may result in class action lawsuits, which can be material to the Company’s business due to the remedies available under these statutes, including punitive damages.

On May 28, 2002, a complaint was filed by plaintiff Lana Waldon in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas against our wholly-owned subsidiary Midland Credit Management, Inc. and two unaffiliated financial institutions. Plaintiff’s first amended complaint purports to assert claims for alleged violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, the Texas Debt Collection Act and the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act on behalf of a class of Texas residents allegedly similarly situated. Generally, the first amended complaint alleges that mailings related to a credit card balance transfer program are deceptive and misleading. The first amended complaint seeks actual, statutory and treble damages in an amount to be determined, together with pre-judgment and post-judgment interest, attorneys’ fees, and preliminary and permanent injunctions enjoining defendants from making offers or distributing materials substantially similar to the mailings that are the subject of the first amended complaint, plus certain other relief. The defendants filed motions to dismiss the first amended complaint, and those motions were denied by the Court on July 30, 2003. Plaintiff has not yet filed her motion for class certification. At present, plaintiff is seeking leave to file a second amended complaint to expand the putative class to a nationwide class with respect to the non-local claims asserted.

22

There are a number of additional lawsuits or claims pending or threatened against the Company. In general, these lawsuits or claims have arisen in the ordinary course of business and involve claims for actual damages arising from alleged misconduct of the Company’s employees or alleged improper reporting of credit information by the Company. Although litigation is inherently uncertain, based on past experience; the information currently available; and the possible availability of insurance and/or indemnification from originating institutions in some cases, management of the Company does not believe that the currently pending and threatened litigation or claims will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations. However, future events or circumstances, currently unknown to management, may determine whether the resolution of pending or threatened litigation or claims will ultimately have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations in any future reporting periods.

The Company does not believe that contingencies for ordinary routine claims, litigation and administrative proceedings and investigations incidental to its business will have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position or results of operations.

Leases

The Company entered into a capital lease in June of 2003 for the purchase of certain computer equipment in the amount of $0.5 million. This lease is non-cancelable and expires in June of 2006. The Company is also party to other various operating and capital leases with respect to its facilities and equipment. Please refer to the Company’s consolidated financial statements and notes thereto in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K as of and for the year ended December 31, 2002 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for discussion of these leases.

Put-backs of Sold Receivables

As an alternative to collection, the Company may elect to sell certain purchased receivables. The sale agreements generally provide the purchaser a right to put-back any purchased receivable that does not meet certain criteria, as defined. The Company has not provided a reserve for put-backs as of June 30, 2003 in its unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements as management believes, based on historical experience, that such an obligation is de minimis.

Third Party Service Agreement

The Company services a pool of charged-off consumer accounts on behalf of an unrelated third party. Servicing fees received under this arrangement were $1.0 million and $1.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. In February of 2003, the Company returned all exhausted receivables to the owner of the portfolios; however, it has retained the servicing rights for certain receivables in active work queues and those placed with its attorney network. As a result of this action, the Company anticipates a decline in service fee income related to these receivables.

23

Employment Agreements

In March 2002, the Company entered into employment agreements with two executive officers. Such agreements generally provided for one-year terms and base compensation aggregating $0.6 million per annum, plus incentive compensation, as defined. The agreements provide for severance payments over periods between one year and one and a half years upon termination without cause, as defined.

Deferred Compensation

Effective March 1, 2002, the Company adopted a non-qualified deferred compensation plan for its senior management. This plan permits deferral of a portion of compensation until a specified period of time. As of June 30, 2003, both the current vested liability and the plan assets approximated $1.2 million and are included in the Company’s consolidated statement of financial condition in accrued liabilities and other assets, respectively. The use of plan assets is legally restricted to distributions to participants or to creditors in the event of bankruptcy.

Self Insured Health Benefits Plan

Effective June 1, 2003, the Company established a self-insured health benefits plan for its employees. This plan is administered by a third party, and has stop loss provisions insuring losses beyond $40 thousand per employee per year, and $1.6 million per year in the aggregate, subject to adjustment as defined. As of June 30, 2003, the Company recorded a reserve for unpaid claims in the amount of $0.1 million in accrued liabilities in the Company’s consolidated statement of financial condition. This amount represents the Company’s estimate of incurred but not reported claims from the inception of the plan at June 1, 2003 to the end of the period, June 30, 2003.

Note 14: Subsequent Event

On July 25, 2003, NCC-1, a wholly-owned bankruptcy-remote, special-purpose entity, entered into a $1.8 million secured financing arrangement (“Secured Financing”). The Secured Financing provided for a 75% advance rate with respect to four purchased receivable portfolios of alternate paper types. Interest accrues at 15.0% and is payable weekly. This note has a maturity date not to exceed October 25, 2005. This Secured Financing is collateralized by charged-off receivables from three receivable portfolios, with an aggregate carrying value of $1.3 million as of June 30, 2003, plus an additional receivable portfolio with a net carrying value of $1.1 million that was purchased in July of 2003, for an aggregate carrying value of $2.4 million. This financing arrangement does not require the Company to share residual collections with the lender. The assets pledged under this financing, together with their associated cash flows, would not be available to satisfy claims of general creditors of the Company until the debt is paid.

24

Index

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Introduction

This “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Encore Capital Group, Inc. as of and for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. A general description of the Company’s industry and a discussion of recent trends affecting that industry are contained therein. Certain statements under this caption may constitute “forward-looking statements” under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the “Reform Act”). Such forward-looking statements involve risks, uncertainties and other factors, which may cause the actual results, performance, or achievements of the Company to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements express or implied by such forward-looking statements. For those statements the Company claims the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Reform Act. (See Part II — Other Information.)

Results of Operations

Six Months Ended June 30, 2003 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2002

The following table summarizes our collections, revenues, operating expenses, and income before taxes (in thousands):

  *  Does not include the net gain of $7.2 million associated with the Litigation Settlement for the six months ended June 30, 2003.

Collections

Gross collections for the six months ended June 30, 2003 were $93.7 million compared to gross collections of $69.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002, an increase of $24.1 million or 34.6%. The increased collections are primarily derived from new portfolios purchased since December of 2000 utilizing our Secured Financing Facility. Collections related to portfolios utilizing our Secured Financing Facility were $75.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003, compared to gross collections of $43.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002, an increase of $32.9 million or 76.5%.

25

Revenues

Total revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2003 were $56.5 million compared to total revenues of $38.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002, an increase of $18.2 million or 47.5%. The increase in total revenues is primarily the result of a $24.1 million or a 34.6% increase in gross collections from $69.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002 to $93.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003. The increase is primarily from revenue from receivable portfolios, which increased $22.0 million or 66.3%, to $55.2 million from $33.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Revenue from the retained interest in securitized receivables declined by $3.0 million, from $3.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002 to $0.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003. This reflects declines in cash collections in the underlying portfolios. As a result we lowered our expected yield on the retained interest from approximately 44.4% to 7.2% per annum. The increase was further offset by a decrease in servicing fees of $0.8 million, a 44.4% decrease, from $1.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002 to $1.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003.

The $22.0 million increase in revenue from receivable portfolios for the six months ended June 30, 2003 compared to the same period in the prior year is primarily attributable to new portfolios purchased during the third and fourth quarters of 2002, as well as the first quarter of 2003. During the six months ended December 31, 2002, we acquired new portfolios with a face value in excess of $1.6 billion at a cost of $38.9 million, which represented 2.47% of face value. During the three months ended March 31, 2003, we purchased additional portfolios with a face value of $0.6 billion at a cost of $18.8 million, or 3.19% of face value. These purchased portfolios provided $21.2 million of revenue during the six months ended June 30, 2003.

We service a pool of charged-off consumer accounts on behalf of an unrelated third party. Servicing fees received under this arrangement were $1.0 million and $1.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. In February of 2003, we returned all exhausted receivables to the owner. We have, however, retained the servicing rights for those certain receivables in active work queues and those placed with our attorney network. As a result of this action, we anticipate that the stream of service fee income related to these receivables will continue to decrease.

26

The following tables summarize the changes in the balance of the investment in receivable portfolios and the proportion of revenue recognized as a percentage of collections during the following periods (in thousands):