Back to GetFilings.com
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT
TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2005
OR
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT
TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission
File Number: 001-32264
DSL.net,
Inc.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware |
06-1510312 |
(State
or other jurisdiction of |
(I.R.S.
Employer |
incorporation
or organization) |
Identification
No.) |
545
Long Wharf Drive |
|
New
Haven, Connecticut |
06511 |
(Address
of principal executive offices) |
(Zip
Code) |
(203)
772-1000
(Registrant's
telephone number, including area code)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days.
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
As of May
7, 2005, the registrant had 233,620,817 shares of common stock
outstanding.
DSL.net,
Inc.
INDEX
|
|
|
Page |
|
|
|
Number |
|
Part
I - Financial Information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item
1. |
Consolidated
Financial Statements |
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheets (unaudited) at March 31, 2005 and |
|
|
|
December
31, 2004 |
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Operations (unaudited) for the three months |
|
|
|
ended
March 31, 2005 and 2004 |
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) for the three months |
|
|
|
ended
March 31, 2005 and 2004 |
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements |
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
Item
2. |
Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and |
|
|
|
Results
of Operations |
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
Item
3. |
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk |
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
Item
4. |
Controls
and Procedures |
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
Part
II - Other Information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item
6. |
Exhibits
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
Signature |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
Index |
|
35 |
DSL.net,
Inc.
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
(dollars
in thousands, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March
31, |
|
December
31, |
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Current
assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,995 |
|
$ |
7,079 |
|
Accounts
receivable (net of allowances of $753 and $874 at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March
31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively) |
|
|
|
|
|
5,798
|
|
|
6,344
|
|
Inventory |
|
|
|
|
|
394
|
|
|
438
|
|
Deferred
costs |
|
|
|
|
|
292
|
|
|
424
|
|
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
1,547
|
|
|
3,914
|
|
Total
current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
16,026
|
|
|
18,199
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed
assets, net |
|
|
|
|
|
10,808
|
|
|
12,719
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
8,482
|
|
|
8,482
|
|
Other
intangible assets, net |
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
47
|
|
Other
assets |
|
|
|
|
|
1,180
|
|
|
1,415
|
|
Total
assets |
|
|
|
|
$ |
36,514 |
|
$ |
40,862 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
payable |
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,986 |
|
$ |
5,887 |
|
Accrued
salaries |
|
|
|
|
|
869
|
|
|
730
|
|
Accrued
liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
1,853
|
|
|
2,459
|
|
Deferred
revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
4,411
|
|
|
4,800
|
|
Current
portion of capital leases payable |
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
50
|
|
Total
current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
11,144
|
|
|
13,926
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes
payable, net of discount |
|
|
|
|
|
16,618
|
|
|
14,544
|
|
Financial
instrument derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
286
|
|
Total
liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
27,910
|
|
|
28,756
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments
and contingencies (Note 7) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders'
equity : |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock: 20,000,000 preferred shares authorized: 14,000 shares
designated as Series Z, $.001 par value; 14,000 shares issued and
outstanding as of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004; liquidation
preference: $15,680 as of March 31, 2005 and December 31,
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,630 |
|
|
2,630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.0005 par value; 800,000,000 shares authorized, 233,620,817
and 233,619,817 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2005 and
December 31, 2004, respectively |
|
|
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
117 |
|
Additional
paid-in capital |
|
|
|
|
|
352,076
|
|
|
352,076
|
|
Accumulated
deficit |
|
|
|
|
|
(346,219 |
) |
|
(342,717 |
) |
Total
stockholders' equity |
|
|
|
|
|
8,604
|
|
|
12,106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
liabilities and stockholders' equity |
|
|
|
|
$ |
36,514 |
|
$ |
40,862 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(dollars
in thousands, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
Three
Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
$ |
15,440 |
|
$ |
17,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Network
(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
10,069
|
|
|
12,199
|
|
Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,765
|
|
|
3,189
|
|
General
and administrative (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
2,707
|
|
|
2,927
|
|
Sales
and marketing |
|
|
|
|
|
430
|
|
|
2,343
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
3,318
|
|
Total
operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
16,971
|
|
|
23,976
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
loss |
|
|
|
|
|
(1,531 |
) |
|
(6,156 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
(expense) income, net |
|
|
|
|
|
(2,109 |
) |
|
(981 |
) |
Other
income (expense), net |
|
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss |
|
|
|
|
$ |
(3,502 |
) |
$ |
(7,063 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss applicable to common stockholders: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss |
|
|
|
|
$ |
(3,502 |
) |
$ |
(7,063 |
) |
Dividends
on preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
(490 |
) |
Accretion
of preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(3,452 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss applicable to common stockholders |
|
|
|
|
$ |
(3,502 |
) |
$ |
(11,005 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss per share, basic and diluted |
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
$ |
(0.08 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
used in computing net loss per share, basic and diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
233,620,150
|
|
|
136,459,553
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
Depreciation and amortization were excluded from the following operating
expense line items and presented as a separate operating expense
line item: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Network |
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,824 |
|
$ |
2,766 |
|
General
and administrative |
|
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
552
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,000 |
|
$ |
3,318 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements. |
DSL.net,
Inc.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(dollars
in thousands)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
Three
Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Cash
flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss |
|
|
|
|
$ |
(3,502 |
) |
$ |
(7,063 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation
of net loss to net cash (used) in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
operating
activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
3,318
|
|
Bad
debt expense |
|
|
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
292
|
|
Sales
credits and allowances |
|
|
|
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
123
|
|
Amortization
of deferred debt issuance costs and debt discount |
|
|
|
|
|
1,980
|
|
|
917
|
|
Non-cash
mark to market adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
(138 |
) |
|
—
|
|
Loss
on sale/write-off of fixed assets |
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
20
|
|
Net
changes in assets and liabilities, net of acquired assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease
in accounts receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
412
|
|
|
264
|
|
Decrease
/ (increase) in prepaid and other current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
(707 |
) |
Decrease
in other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
118
|
|
(Decrease)
/ increase in accounts payable |
|
|
|
|
|
(1,901 |
) |
|
1,969
|
|
Increase
in accrued salaries |
|
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
210
|
|
(Decrease)
in accrued expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
(512 |
) |
|
(2,684 |
) |
(Decrease)
in deferred revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
(389 |
) |
|
(55 |
) |
Net
cash used in operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
(1,429 |
) |
|
(3,278 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases
of property and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
(207 |
) |
Decrease
/ (increase) in restricted cash |
|
|
|
|
|
2,430
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Net
cash provided by (used) in investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
2,370
|
|
|
(208 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds
from common stock issuance |
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
12
|
|
Principal
payments under capital lease obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
(35 |
) |
Net
cash used by financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
increase / (decrease) increase in cash and cash
equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
916
|
|
|
(3,509 |
) |
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of the period |
|
|
|
|
|
7,079
|
|
|
13,779
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of the period |
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,995 |
|
$ |
10,270 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
disclosure: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
paid: interest |
|
|
|
|
$ |
76 |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed
asset purchases included in accounts payable |
|
|
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
$ |
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
disclosure of non-cash financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During
the first quarter of 2004, a total of 6,000 shares of Series X Preferred
Stock were converted |
into
33,333,333 shares of common stock and $1,560 of accrued dividends
pertaining thereto were |
paid
by issuing 2,316,832 shares of common stock (Note 8). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Also
during the first quarter 2004, 1,000 shares of Series Y Preferred Stock
were converted |
into
2,260,910 shares of common stock and $221 of accrued dividends pertaining
thereto were |
paid
by issuing 309,864 shares of common stock. (Note 8). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Also
during the first quarter of 2004, the Company issued 413,160 shares of its
common stock |
upon
the exercise of 1,358,025 stock warrants granted in connection with
certain loan guarantees |
in
a cashless exchange (Note 8). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DSL.net,
Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(Dollars
in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
1. Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
A. Basis of
Presentation
The
consolidated financial statements (“financial statements”) of DSL.net, Inc.
(“DSL.net” or the “Company”) at March 31, 2005 and for the three months ended
March 31, 2005 and 2004 are unaudited, but, in the opinion of management,
include all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) that
DSL.net considers necessary for a fair presentation of its financial position
and operating results. Operating results for the three months ended March 31,
2005 are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for any
future periods.
These
financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to
Form 10-Q and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission (“SEC”). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally
included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such
instructions, rules and regulations. While management believes the disclosures
presented are adequate to make these financial statements not misleading, these
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company's audited
financial statements and related notes included in the Company's Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, which has been filed with the
SEC.
The
preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, including the
recoverability of tangible and intangible assets, disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements, and the
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported period. The
markets for the Company’s services are characterized by intense competition,
rapid technological development, regulatory and legislative changes, and
frequent new product introductions, all of which could impact the reported
amounts and future value of the Company’s assets and liabilities. Actual results
may differ from those estimates.
The
Company evaluates its estimates on an on-going basis. The most significant
estimates relate to revenue recognition, goodwill, intangible assets and other
long-lived assets, the allowance for doubtful accounts, the fair
value of financial instruments and derivatives, and contingencies
and litigation. Such estimates are based on historical experience and on various
other assumptions that the Company believes to be reasonable under the
circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about
the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from
other sources. Actual results may differ materially from those
estimates.
The
Company has one reportable business operating segment under the requirements of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 131.
The
Company believes the following critical accounting policies affect the Company’s
more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of its
consolidated financial statements:
DSL.net,
Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
(Unaudited)
(Dollars
in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
Revenue
Recognition
The
Company recognizes revenue in accordance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin
(“SAB”) No. 104, “Revenue
Recognition,” which
outlines the four basic criteria that must be met before revenue can be
recognized: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (2) delivery has
occurred or services have been rendered; (3) the fee is fixed or determinable;
and (4) collectibility is reasonably assured. Determination of criteria (3) and
(4) are based on management’s judgments regarding the fixed nature of the fee
charged for services rendered and products delivered and the collectibility of
those fees.
Revenue
is recognized pursuant to the terms of each contract on a monthly service fee
basis, which varies based on the speed of the customer’s broadband connection
and the services ordered by the customer. The monthly fee includes phone line
charges, Internet access charges, the cost of any leased equipment installed at
the customer's site and fees for the other services provided by the Company, as
applicable. Revenue that is billed in advance of the services provided is
deferred until the services are provided by the Company. Revenue related to
installation charges is also deferred and amortized to revenue over 18 months,
which is the average customer life of the existing customer base. Installation
direct costs incurred (up to the amount of deferred revenue) are also deferred
and amortized to expense over 18 months. Any excess of direct costs over
installation charges are charged to expense as incurred. In certain instances,
the Company negotiates credits and allowances for service related matters. The
Company establishes a reserve against revenue for such credits based on
historical experience. From time to time the Company offers sales incentives to
its customers in the form of rebates toward select installation services and
customer premise equipment. The Company records a liability based on historical
experience for such estimated rebate costs, with a corresponding reduction to
revenue.
The
Company seeks to price its services competitively. The market for high-speed
data communications services and Internet access is rapidly evolving and
intensely competitive. While many competitors and potential competitors may
enjoy competitive advantages over the Company, the Company is pursuing a
significant market that, management believes, is currently under-served. During
the past several years, market prices for many telecommunications services and
equipment have been declining, which is a trend that might continue. Although
pricing is an important part of the Company’s strategy, management believes that
its direct relationships with its customers and consistent, high quality service
and customer support are key to generating and maintaining customer loyalty.
Goodwill,
Intangible Assets and Other Long-Lived Assets
Goodwill
represents the excess purchase price over the fair value of identifiable net
assets of businesses acquired and is not amortized. Other intangible assets are
amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated future periods to be
benefited, ranging from two to five years.
The
Company reviews the recoverability of goodwill annually, or when events and
circumstances change, by comparing the estimated fair values, based on a
discounted forecast of future cash flows, of reporting units with their
respective net book values. If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its
carrying amount, the goodwill of the reporting unit is not considered impaired.
If the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the
goodwill impairment loss is measured as the excess of the carrying value of
goodwill over its implied fair value. There was no impairment of goodwill at
March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004.
DSL.net,
Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(continued)
(Unaudited)
(Dollars
in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
The
Company accounts for its long-lived assets in accordance with SFAS No. 144,
“Accounting
for the Impairment of Long-lived Assets and for Long-lived Assets to be Disposed
of,” which
requires that long-lived assets and certain intangible assets be reviewed for
impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount may not be recoverable. If undiscounted expected future cash
flows are less than the carrying value of the assets, an impairment loss is to
be recognized based on the fair value of the assets. There was
no impairment of long-lived assets at March 31,
2005 and December
31, 2004.
If market
conditions become less favorable, future cash flows (the key variable in
assessing the impairment of these assets) may decrease and as a result the
Company may be required to recognize impairment charges.
Allowance
for Doubtful Accounts
The
Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses
resulting from the inability of its customers to make required payments. Such
allowance requires management’s estimates and judgments and is computed based on
historical experience using varying percentages of aged receivables. The Company
principally sells its services directly to end users mainly consisting of small
to medium sized businesses, but the Company also sells its services to certain
resellers, such as Internet service providers (“ISPs”). The Company believes
that it does not have significant exposure or concentrations of credit risk with
respect to any given customer. However, if the country or any region the Company
services experiences an economic downturn, the financial condition of the
Company’s customers could be adversely affected, which could result in their
inability to make payments to the Company. This could require additional
provisions for doubtful accounts and an increase in the allowance. In addition,
a negative impact on revenue and cash flows related to those customers may
occur. No individual customer accounted for more than 5% of revenue for the
three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments and Derivatives
The
Company accounts for derivative instruments in accordance with SFAS No. 133,
“Accounting
for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” which
establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments and
hedging activities, including certain derivative instruments imbedded in other
financial instruments or contracts and requires recognition of all derivatives
on the balance sheet at fair value, regardless of the hedging relationship
designation. Accounting for the changes in the fair value of the derivative
instruments depends on whether the derivatives qualify as hedge relationships
and the types of the relationships designated are based on the exposures hedged.
Changes in the fair value of derivatives designated as fair value hedges are
recognized in earnings along with fair value changes of the hedged item. Changes
in the fair value of derivatives designated as cash flow hedges are recorded in
other comprehensive income (loss) and are recognized in earnings when the hedged
item affects earnings. Changes in the fair value of derivative instruments which
are not designated as hedges are recognized in earnings as other income (loss).
At March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, the Company did not have any derivative
instruments that were designated as hedges.
The
Company has issued various financial debt and/or equity instruments, some of
which have required a determination of their fair value and/or the fair value of
certain related derivatives, where quoted market prices were not published or
readily available. The Company bases its fair value determinations on valuation
techniques that require judgments and estimates including discount rates used in
applying present value analyses, the length of historical look-backs used in
determining the volatility of its stock, expected future interest rate
assumptions and probability assessments.
DSL.net,
Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(continued)
(Unaudited)
(Dollars
in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
From time
to time, the Company may hire independent valuation specialists to perform and
or assist in the fair value determination of such instruments.
Contingencies
and Litigation
From time
to time, the Company may be involved in litigation concerning claims arising in
the ordinary course of its business, including claims brought by former
employees and claims related to acquisitions. The Company records liabilities
when a loss is probable and can be reasonably estimated. These estimates are
based on analyses made by internal and external legal counsel who consider
information known at the time. The Company believes it has made reasonable
estimates in the past; however, court decisions and other factors could cause
liabilities to be incurred in excess of estimates.
Inventory
Inventories
consist of modems and routers (customer premise equipment or “CPE”) which the
Company sells or leases to customers and are required to establish a high speed
DSL or T-1 digital connection. Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or
market. Cost of inventory is determined on the “first-in, first-out” (“FIFO”) or
average cost methods. The Company establishes inventory reserves for excess,
obsolete or slow-moving inventory based on changes in customer demand and
technology.
Income
Taxes
The
Company uses the liability method of accounting for income taxes, as set forth
in SFAS No. 109, “Accounting
for Income Taxes.” Under
this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected
future tax consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amounts
and the tax basis of assets and liabilities and net operating loss
carryforwards, all calculated using presently enacted tax rates.
The
Company has not generated any taxable income to date and, therefore, has not
paid any federal income taxes or state taxes based on income since inception.
The Company’s state net operating loss carryforwards began to expire in 2004 and
its federal net operating loss carryforwards begin to expire in 2019. Use of the
Company’s net operating loss carryforwards may be subject to significant annual
limitations resulting from a change in control due to securities issuances
including the Company’s sales of its mandatorily redeemable convertible Series X
preferred stock (the “Series X Preferred Stock”) and its mandatorily redeemable
convertible Series Y preferred stock (the “Series Y Preferred Stock”) in 2001
and 2002 and from the sale of $30,000 in notes and warrants in 2003. The Company
is currently assessing the potential impact resulting from these transactions.
The Company has provided a valuation allowance for the full amount of the net
deferred tax asset since it has not determined that it is more likely than not
that these future benefits will be realized.
B. Earnings
(Loss) Per Share
The
Company computes earnings (loss) per share pursuant to SFAS No. 128,
“Earnings
Per Share.” Basic
earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing income or loss applicable to
common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of the Company's
common stock outstanding during the period, excluding shares subject to
repurchase.
DSL.net,
Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(continued)
(Unaudited)
(Dollars
in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
Diluted
earnings per share is determined in the same manner as basic earnings per share
except that the number of shares is increased assuming exercise of dilutive
stock options and warrants using the treasury stock method and dilutive
conversion of the Company’s outstanding preferred stock. The diluted earnings
per share amount is presented herein as the same as the basic earnings per share
amount because the Company had a net loss during each period presented, and the
impact of the assumed exercise of stock options and warrants and the assumed
conversion of preferred stock would have been anti-dilutive.
The
following options and warrants and convertible preferred stock were excluded
from the calculation of earnings per share since their inclusion would be
anti-dilutive for all periods presented:
|
|
Shares
of Common Stock |
|
|
|
March
31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Options
to purchase common stock |
|
38,562,713 |
|
|
32,359,777 |
|
Warrants
to purchase common stock |
|
192,212,192 |
|
|
171,747,621 |
|
Preferred
Series X stock convertible to common stock |
|
— |
|
|
77,777,778 |
|
Total |
|
230,774,905 |
|
|
281,885,176 |
|
As of
March 31, 2005, the Company had 233,620,817 shares of common stock issued and
outstanding. As of December 31, 2004, the Company had 233,619,817 shares of
common stock issued and outstanding. The increase during the first quarter of
2005 resulted from 1,000 shares of common stock issued to employees
participating in the Company’s 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. The weighted
average number of shares of common stock outstanding used in computing earnings
per share for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 was 233,620,150 and
136,459,553, respectively.
C. Incentive
Stock Award Plans
As of
March 31, 2005, the Company had five stock-based employee compensation plans,
which are described more fully in the Company's audited financial statements and
related notes included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2004. The Company accounts for stock-based compensation under
the intrinsic value method in accordance with Accounting Principles Board
Opinion No. 25, “Accounting
for Stock Issued to Employees” (“APB
25”). Accordingly, compensation expense is not recognized for the fair market
value of options on the date of grant.
The
following table presents the effect on the Company's net loss and net loss per
share as if the Company had applied the fair value method of accounting for
stock-based compensation in accordance with SFAS No. 123, “Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation” (“SFAS
123”):
DSL.net,
Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(continued)
(Unaudited)
(Dollars
in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
|
|
Three
Months Ended
March
31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss, as reported |
|
$ |
(3,502 |
) |
$ |
(7,063 |
) |
Deduct:
total stock-based employee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
compensation
expense determined under |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fair
value based method for all awards, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
net
of related tax effects |
|
|
(951 |
) |
|
(703 |
) |
Pro
forma under SFAS 123 |
|
$ |
(4,453 |
) |
$ |
(7,766 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss applicable to common stockholders: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As
reported |
|
$ |
(3,502 |
) |
$ |
(11,005 |
) |
Pro
forma under SFAS 123 |
|
$ |
(4,453 |
) |
$ |
(11,708 |
) |
Basic
and diluted net loss per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As
reported |
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
$ |
(0.08 |
) |
Pro
forma under SFAS 123 |
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
The
estimated fair value at date of grant for options granted during the three
months ended March 31, 2005 ranged from $0.10 to $0.20 per share, and for the
three months ended March 31, 2004 ranged from $0.56 to $0.71 per share. The
minimum value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average
assumptions:
|
|
Three
Months Ended
March
31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk
free interest rate |
|
|
3.38-4.15% |
|
|
1.96-2.95% |
|
Expected
dividend yield |
|
|
None |
|
|
None |
|
Expected
life of option |
|
|
3-4
Years |
|
|
3-4
Years |
|
Expected
volatility |
|
|
96%-102% |
|
|
145% |
|
As
additional options are expected to be granted in future periods, and the options
vest over several years, the above pro forma results are not necessarily
indicative of future pro forma results.
DSL.net,
Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(continued)
(Unaudited)
(Dollars
in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
D. Recently
Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In
September 2004, the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) issued EITF No. 04-10
“Applying
Paragraph 19 of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Statement No.
131,
‘Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information,’
in
Determining Whether to Aggregate Operating Segments that do not Meet the
Quantitative Thresholds.” EITF No.
04-10 presents guidelines for two alternative approaches in determining whether
to aggregate operating segments and is effective for fiscal years ending after
October 13, 2004. The Company has determined that EITF No. 04-10 did not have an
impact on its operating segment disclosures.
On
December 16, 2004, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 123 (revised 2004),
“Share-Based
Payment” (“SFAS
123R”), which is a revision of Statement No. 123, “Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation” (“SFAS
123”), and supersedes APB 25, “Accounting
for Stock Issued to Employees,” and
amends FASB Statement No. 95, “Statement
of Cash Flows.”
Generally, the approach in SFAS 123R is similar to the approach described in
SFAS 123. However, SFAS 123R requires all share-based payments to employees,
including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the income
statement based on their fair values. Pro forma disclosure is no longer an
alternative.
Under
SFAS 123R, the Company must determine the appropriate fair value model to be
used for valuing share-based payments, the amortization method for compensation
cost and the transition method to be used at the date of adoption. The
transition alternatives include retrospective and prospective adoption methods.
Under the retrospective method, prior periods may be restated based on the
amounts previously recognized under SFAS 123 for purposes of pro forma
disclosures either for all periods presented or as of the beginning of the year
of adoption.
The
prospective method requires that compensation expense be recognized beginning
with the effective date, based on the requirements of SFAS 123R, for all
share-based payments granted after the effective date, and based on the
requirements of SFAS 123, for all awards granted to employees prior to the
effective date of SFAS 123R that remain unvested on the effective date.
The
provisions of this statement are effective as of the beginning of the first
annual reporting period that begins after June 15, 2005. The Company expects to
adopt the standard on January 1, 2006. The Company is evaluating the
requirements of SFAS 123R and has not determined its method of adoption or its
impact on its financial condition or results of operations.
In
December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS 153, “Exchange
of Non-monetary Assets, an Amendment of APB Opinion No 29” (“SFAS
153”). SFAS 153 eliminates the exception for non-monetary exchanges of similar
productive assets, which were previously required to be recorded on a carryover
basis rather than a fair value basis. Instead, this statement provides that
exchanges of non-monetary assets that do not have commercial substance be
reported at carryover basis rather than a fair value basis. A non-monetary
exchange is considered to have commercial substance if the future cash flows of
the entity are expected to change significantly as a result of the exchange. The
provisions of this statement are effective for non-monetary asset exchanges
occurring in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company expects
to adopt the standard on July 1, 2005. The Company is evaluating the
requirements of SFAS 153 and has not determined the impact on its financial
condition or results of operations.
DSL.net,
Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(continued)
(Unaudited)
(Dollars
in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
2. Liquidity
As
reflected in the Company's audited financial statements and related notes
included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2004, the Company incurred operating losses of approximately $18,001
and negative operating cash flows of approximately $7,541. During
the three months ended March 31, 2005, the Company incurred operating losses of
approximately $1,531 and negative operating cash flows of approximately $1,429.
These operating losses and negative operating cash flows have been financed
primarily by proceeds from debt and equity issuances. The Company had
accumulated deficits of approximately $346,219 at March 31, 2005 and $342,717 at
December 31, 2004. The Company expects its operating losses, net operating cash
outflows and capital expenditures to continue through 2005.
The
Company successfully completed equity financing transactions of approximately
$10,000 in March 2002 and $8,500 in May 2002 (which, after cancellation of
certain bridge loans, yielded net proceeds of approximately $5,000). On July 18,
2003, the Company successfully raised approximately $30,000 in debt and equity
financing. In addition, on October 7, 2004, the Company raised $4,250 in a
secured convertible note and warrant financing (Note 6). The Company’s
independent registered public accounting firm has noted in their report on the
Company’s audited financial statements and related notes included in the
Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 that
the Company’s sustained operating losses raise substantial doubt about its
ability to continue as a going concern. Based on its current business plans and
projections, the Company believes that its existing cash resources and cash
expected to be generated from operations will be sufficient to fund its
operating losses, capital expenditures, lease payments and working capital
requirements at least into the fourth quarter of 2005. As a result, the Company
will need to raise additional financing in 2005, through some combination of
borrowings or the sale of equity or debt securities, in order to finance its
ongoing operating requirements and to enable it to repay all of its existing
long-term debt. The Company is pursuing financing alternatives to fund its
anticipated cash deficiency and to refinance its existing long-term debt. The
Company may not be able to raise sufficient additional debt, equity or other
capital on acceptable terms, if at all. Failure to generate sufficient revenues,
contain certain discretionary spending, achieve certain other business plan
objectives, refinance the Company’s long-term debt or raise additional funds
could have a material adverse affect on the Company’s results of operations,
cash flows and financial position, including its ability to continue as a going
concern, and may require it to significantly reduce, reorganize, discontinue or
shut down its operations.
The
Company’s cash requirements and financial performance, including its ability to
achieve and sustain profitability or become and remain cash flow positive, may
vary based upon a number of factors, including:
· |
the
Company's ability to raise sufficient additional
capital; |
· |
the
Company's business plans or projections change or prove to be inaccurate;
|
· |
the
Company's determination to curtail and/or reorganize its
operations; |
· |
the
development of the high-speed data and integrated voice and data
communications industries and the Company’s ability to compete effectively
in such industries; |
· |
the
amount, timing and pricing of customer revenue;
|
DSL.net,
Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(continued)
(Unaudited)
(Dollars
in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
· |
the
Company’s ability to retain existing
customers and associated revenue; |
· |
the
availability, timing and pricing of acquisition opportunities, and the
Company’s ability to capitalize on such
opportunities; |
· |
the
Company's identification of and generation of synergies with potential
business combination candidates, and the Company’s ability to close any
transactions with such parties on favorable terms, if at all;
|
· |
commercial
acceptance of the Company’s services and the Company’s ability to attain
expected penetration within its target markets;
|
· |
the
Company’s ability to recruit and retain qualified
personnel; |
· |
up
front sales and marketing expenses; |
· |
cost
and utilization of the Company’s network components that it leases from
other telecommunications providers and that hinge, in substantial part, on
government regulation that has been subject to considerable flux in recent
years; |
· |
the
Company’s ability to establish and maintain relationships with marketing
partners; |
· |
the
successful implementation and management of financial, information
management and operations support systems to efficiently and
cost-effectively manage the Company’s operations and growth;
and |
· |
favorable
outcomes of numerous federal and state regulatory proceedings and related
judicial proceedings, including proceedings relating to the 1996
Telecommunications Act. |
There can
be no assurance that the Company will be able to achieve its business plan
objectives or that it will achieve cash flow positive operating results. If the
Company is unable to generate adequate funds from its operations or raise
additional funds, it may not be able to repay its existing debt, continue to
operate its network, respond to competitive pressures or fund its operations. As
a result, the Company may be required to significantly reduce, reorganize,
discontinue or shut down its operations. The Company’s financial statements do
not include any adjustments that might result from these
uncertainties.
3. Stockholders'
Equity
During
the three months ended March 31, 2005, the Company issued 1,000 shares of its
common stock to employees participating in its 1999 Employee Stock Purchase
Plan. During the three months ended March 31, 2004, the Company issued
33,333,333 and 2,316,832 shares of its common stock, respectively, upon the
conversion of 6,000 shares of Series X Preferred Stock and as payment for
approximately $1,560 of accrued dividends on such converted shares of Series X
Preferred Stock (Note 8). Also during the first quarter of 2004, the Company
issued 2,260,910 and 309,864 shares of its common stock, respectively, upon the
conversion of 1,000 shares of Series Y Preferred Stock and as payment for
approximately $221 of accrued dividends on such converted shares of Series Y
Preferred Stock (Note 8). In addition, during the first quarter of 2004, the
Company issued 413,160 shares of its common stock, upon the exercise of
1,358,025 stock warrants granted in connection with certain loan guarantees and
it issued 30,467 and 6,336 shares of its common stock, respectively, upon
exercises of employee stock options and to employees participating in the
Company’s 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
DSL.net,
Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(continued)
(Unaudited)
(Dollars
in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
4. Restructuring
The
Company had no restructuring charges during the first quarter of 2005 and has no
restructuring reserve balance at March 31, 2005.
In March,
2004, the Company reduced its workforce by 62 employees at its locations in New
Haven, Connecticut; Herndon, Virginia; Minneapolis, Minnesota and Wilmington,
North Carolina. As a result, the Company incurred approximately $160 in
restructuring charges pertaining to severance and benefits
payments.
During
the first quarter of 2004, the Company charged approximately $156 against its
restructuring reserves which related to facilities expense associated with the
Company’s vacated office space in Santa Cruz, California. The Company’s
restructuring reserve balance as of March 31, 2004, of approximately $384,
represented estimated costs associated with such vacated facility and was
included in the Company’s accrued liabilities.
5. Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets
The
following table shows the gross and unamortized balances of other intangible
assets which are comprised solely of customer lists:
March
31, 2005 |
|
December
31, 2004 |
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
Gross |
Amortization |
Net |
|
Gross |
Amortization |
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
15,483 |
$
15,465 |
$
18 |
|
$
15,483 |
$
15,436 |
$
47 |
Amortization
expense of other intangible assets for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and
2004 was $29 and $267, respectively. The unamortized balance of customer lists
as of March 31, 2005, of $18 will be fully amortized during 2005.
In
accordance with the provisions SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets” (“SFAS
142”), which became effective on January 1, 2002, the Company ceased to amortize
$8,482 of goodwill in accordance with of SFAS 142.
In lieu
of amortization, the Company made an initial impairment review of its goodwill
in January of 2002 which did not result in any impairment adjustments.
Impairment reviews have also been performed annually thereafter. The Company did
not record any goodwill impairment adjustments resulting from its impairment
reviews. The Company did not acquire nor dispose of any goodwill during the
first quarter of 2005 or the calendar year 2004, therefore, the carrying value
of the goodwill at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 was $8,482. The Company
will continue to perform annual impairment reviews, unless a change in
circumstances requires a review in the interim.
DSL.net,
Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(continued)
(Unaudited)
(Dollars
in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
6. Debt
On
October 7, 2004, the Company closed a financing transaction with Laurus Master
Fund, Ltd. (“Laurus”), pursuant to which the Company sold to Laurus convertible
notes and a warrant to purchase common stock of the Company. The securities
issued to Laurus were a $4,250 Secured Convertible Minimum Borrowing Note (the
“MB Note”), a $750 Secured Revolving Note (the “Revolving Note” and, together
with the MB Note, the “Laurus Notes”), and a Common Stock Purchase Warrant to
purchase 1,143,000 shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Laurus Warrant”).
As part of the financing transaction with Laurus, the Company paid Laurus a
closing fee of $163. The Laurus Notes are collateralized by a security interest
and first priority lien on certain trade accounts receivable.
The
Company and Laurus had placed the transactions and funds into escrow on August
31, 2004, pending the Company's procurement of a waiver of certain rights of
Deutsche Bank AG London, acting through DB Advisors LLC as Investment Agent
(“Deutsche Bank”), and VantagePoint Venture Partners III (Q), L.P., VantagePoint
Venture Partners III, L.P., VantagePoint Communications Partners, L.P. and
VantagePoint Venture Partners 1996, L.P. (collectively, “VantagePoint,” and,
together with Deutsche Bank, the “Investors”), represented by Deutsche Bank
Trust Company Americas, the administrative agent to the Investors (“DBTCA”), and
agreement from such Investors to subordinate their lien on trade accounts
receivable of the Company to the lien granted to Laurus. On October 7, 2004, the
Company reached agreement with Laurus and the Investors on subordination terms
and the initial financing proceeds of $4,250 were released from escrow, of which
$4,024 were deposited into a Company account with DBTCA. Upon closing the
transaction, the Company's withdrawal and use of such financing proceeds was
subject to the prior approval of Deutsche Bank and DBTCA. During the period
following the closing of this transaction through March 31, 2005, the Company
sought and received all requisite approvals of the Deutsche Bank entities
necessary to withdraw and use all of the proceeds from the Laurus financing.
The
Laurus Notes mature on August 1, 2006. Annual interest on the Laurus Notes is
equal to the prime rate published in The Wall Street Journal from time to time,
plus two percent rate (7% as of March 31, 2005), provided, that such annual rate
of interest on the Laurus Notes may not be less than six percent or more than
seven percent. Notwithstanding the six percent interest rate floor, the interest
rate on the Laurus Notes will be decreased two percent per annum for each 25%
increase in the price of the Company’s common stock above $0.28 per share, if,
at that time, the Company has on file with the SEC an effective registration
statement for the resale of shares of common stock issued or issuable upon
conversion of the MB Note and upon exercise of the Laurus Warrant and, if not,
the interest rate will be decreased one percent per annum for each 25% increase
in the price of the Company’s common stock above $0.28 per share. As of February
4, 2005, the Company has on file with the SEC an effective registration
statement for the resale of shares of common stock underlying the MB Note and
Laurus Warrant. Any change in the interest rate on the Laurus Notes will be
determined on a monthly basis. In no event will the interest rate on the Laurus
Notes be less than 0.00%. Interest
on the Laurus Notes is payable monthly in arrears on the first day of each month
during the term of the Laurus Notes.
The
initial fixed conversion price under the Laurus Notes is $0.28 per share. The
initial conversion price and the number of shares of the Company’s common stock
issuable upon conversion of the each of the Laurus Notes are subject to
adjustment in the event that the Company reclassifies, subdivides or combines
its outstanding shares of common stock or issues additional shares of its common
stock as a dividend on its outstanding shares of common stock. The fixed
conversion price is subject to anti-dilution protection adjustments, on a
weighted average basis,
DSL.net,
Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(continued)
(Unaudited)
(Dollars
in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
upon the
Company's issuance of additional shares of common stock at a price that is less
than the then current fixed conversion price. Subject to certain limitations,
Laurus may, at any time, convert the outstanding indebtedness of each of the
Laurus Notes into shares of the Company’s common stock at the then applicable
conversion price. Subject to certain trading volume and other limitations, the
MB Note will automatically convert at the then applicable conversion price into
shares of the Company’s common stock if, at any time while an effective
registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
“Securities Act”), for the resale of the Company’s common stock underlying the
MB Note and Laurus Warrant is outstanding, the average closing price of the
Company’s common stock for ten consecutive trading days is at least $0.31,
subject to certain adjustments. The Revolving Note is potentially convertible
into more than $750 worth of the Company’s common stock, depending upon the
amount of aggregate borrowings by the Company under the Revolving Note and the
amount of conversions by Laurus.
The
Laurus Warrant grants Laurus the right to purchase up to 1,143,000 shares of the
Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.35 per share. On October 7,
2004, the Company also issued a warrant to purchase 178,571 shares of the
Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.35, and made a cash payment of
approximately $38, to TN Capital Equities, Ltd. (“TN”), as compensation for TN
having served as the placement agent in the financing transaction with Laurus.
The Laurus Warrant and the warrant issued to TN each expire on August 31, 2009.
Under the terms of the Minimum Borrowing Note Registration Rights Agreement,
Laurus has been afforded certain registration rights with respect to the shares
of the Company’s common stock underlying the MB Note and the Laurus Warrant. TN
was also afforded piggyback registration rights for the shares of the Company’s
common stock underlying the warrant it received. On November 5, 2004, the
Company filed with the SEC a preliminary registration statement on Form S-3
covering the potential resale of the shares of common stock underlying the MB
Note, the Laurus Warrant and the warrant issued to TN. The registration
statement was declared effective and the Company filed with the SEC its Rule
424(b) final prospectus on February 4, 2005.
In
exchange for agreement by the Investors to subordinate to Laurus their prior
lien on certain of the Company’s accounts receivable, the Company issued
warrants to the Investors (the “2004 Warrants”), allocated ratably in accordance
with the Investors’ interests in the Company's July 2003 note and warrant
financing, to purchase up to an aggregate of 19,143,000 shares of common stock.
The 2004 Warrants were approved by the Company’s stockholders on February 9,
2005; expire on July 18, 2006; and are exercisable solely in the event of a
change of control of the Company where the price paid per share of common stock
or the value per share of common stock retained by the Company's common
stockholders in any such change of control (the “Change of Control Price”) is
less than the then current per share exercise price of the warrants issued as
part of the Company’s July 2003 financing led by Deutsche Bank. The exercise
price of the 2004 Warrants will be calculated at the time of a qualifying change
of control of the Company, if any, and will be equal to the Change of Control
Price. The Investors have been afforded certain registration rights with regard
to the 2004 Warrants. As a condition to the Company's issuance of the 2004
Warrants, the Investors waived any anti-dilution rights to which they might
otherwise be entitled under all warrants previously issued to the Investors
resulting from the issuance or exercise of the 2004 Warrants. The Company
determined that the fair value of the 2004 Warrants is not material and
accordingly no modifications to the July 18, 2003 note and warrant transaction
was required.
The
Company determined, in accordance with the guidance of SFAS 133, “Accounting
for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” that the
following derivatives resulted from the Laurus financing transaction described
above: (i) the conversion option of the MB Note and (ii) the 1,321,571 warrants
issued to Laurus and TN. Accordingly, the Company recorded the fair value of
these derivatives approximating $231 as a debt discount and a non-current
liability on its
DSL.net,
Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(continued)
(Unaudited)
(Dollars
in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
consolidated
balance sheet. The note discount is being amortized to interest expense using
the “Effective Interest Method” of amortization over the 22 month term of the
Laurus Notes. For the three months ended March 31, 2005, approximately $30 of
this note discount was amortized to interest expense. At March 31, 2005, the
value of the derivatives was decreased by approximately $138 to the then current
fair value of approximately $148 with a corresponding increase to other income.
At December 31, 2004, the value of the derivatives was increased by
approximately $55 to the then current fair value of approximately $286 with a
corresponding charge to other expense. The Company will continue to mark these
derivatives to market on a quarterly basis.
7. Commitments
and Contingencies
Commitments
Under the
Company’s facility operating leases, minimum operating lease payments are
approximately $1,293 in 2005, $594 in 2006, $169 in 2007, $169 in 2007 and $14
in 2008.
The
Company has varying purchase commitments with certain service providers that
range from one to five years all of which may be cancelled with prior written
notice of which some are subject to early termination fees.
Contingencies
The
Company has entered into interconnection agreements with traditional local
telephone companies. The agreements generally have terms of one to two years and
are subject to certain renewal and termination provisions by either party,
generally upon 30 days’ notification. The Company has renewed such agreements
beyond their initial terms in the past and anticipates that it will do so in the
future. Future interconnection agreements may contain terms and conditions less
favorable to the Company than those in its current agreements and could increase
the Company’s costs of operations, particularly when there are changes to the
federal or state legal requirements applicable to such agreements.
In
February 2005, the Federal Communications Commission (the “FCC”) issued its
Triennial Review Remand Order (the “TRRO”) and adopted new rules, effective
March 11, 2005, governing the obligations of incumbent local exchange carriers
(“ILECs”) to afford access to certain of their network elements, if at all, and
the cost of such facilities. Among other things, the TRRO reduces the ILECs’
obligations to provide high-capacity DS1 loops and DS1 and DS3 dedicated
transport facilities between certain ILEC wire centers that are deemed to be
sufficiently competitive, based upon the number of fiber collocators or the
number of business access lines within such wire centers. The TRRO eliminates,
over time, the ILECs’ obligations to provide these high-capacity circuits to
competitive local exchange carriers (“CLEC”) like the Company at the discounted
rates CLECs have historically received under the 1996 Telecommunications Act.
Beginning in March 2005, the costs for those of the Company’s existing
high-capacity circuits impacted by the FCC’s new rules increased by 15%. By
March 10, 2006, the Company will be required to transition those existing
facilities to alternative arrangements, such as other competitive facilities or
the higher-priced “special access services” offered by the ILECs. Additionally,
subject to any contractual protections the Company may have under its existing
interconnection agreements with ILECs, beginning March 11, 2005, the Company is
subject to the ILECs’ higher “special access” pricing for any new installations
of DS1 loops and/or DS1 and DS3 transport facilities in the impacted ILEC wire
centers.
Although the
Company is currently assessing the potential impact of these price increases on
its network operating expense, as well as evaluating network configuration
alternatives that may help minimize the impact of these increases, the Company
currently estimates that its
DSL.net,
Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(continued)
(Unaudited)
(Dollars
in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
network
operating expense will increase by approximately $20 per month as a result of
the March 2005 pricing changes.
In
certain markets where the Company has not deployed its own equipment, the
Company utilizes local facilities from wholesale providers, including Covad
Communications (“Covad”), in order to provide service to its end-user customers.
These wholesale providers may terminate their service with little or no notice.
The failure of Covad or any of the Company’s other wholesale providers to
provide acceptable service could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s
operations. There can be no assurance that Covad or other wholesale providers
will be successful in managing their operations and business plans.
The
Company transmits data across its network via transmission facilities that are
leased from certain carriers, including Level 3 Communications, Inc. and MCI.
The failure of any of the Company’s data transport carriers to provide
acceptable service on acceptable terms could have a material adverse effect on
the Company’s operations.
8. Mandatorily
Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock
As more
fully described in the Company's audited financial statements and related notes
included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2004, the Company entered into a Series X Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement
with VantagePoint on November 14, 2001 (the “Series X Purchase Agreement”),
relating to the sale and purchase of up to an aggregate of 20,000 shares of
Series X Preferred Stock at a purchase price of $1,000 per share. On December
24, 2001, the Company entered into a Series Y Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement
(the “Series Y Purchase Agreement”) with Columbia Capital Equity Partners III,
L.P., Columbia Capital Equity Partners II, L.P., The Lafayette Investment Fund,
L.P., Charles River Partnership X, a Limited Partnership, and N.I.G. Broadslate
(collectively with their assigns, the “Series Y Investors”), relating to the
sale and purchase of up to an aggregate of 15,000 shares of Series Y Preferred
Stock at a purchase price of $1,000 per share.
Pursuant
to the Series X Purchase Agreement, in 2001 and 2002, the Company sold an
aggregate of 20,000 shares of Series X Preferred Stock to VantagePoint for total
proceeds of $20,000, before direct issuance costs of approximately $189.
Pursuant to the Series Y Purchase Agreement, in 2001 and 2002, the Company sold
an aggregate of 15,000 shares of Series Y Preferred Stock to the Series Y
Investors for an aggregate purchase price of $15,000, before direct issuance
costs of approximately $300.
During
the third and fourth quarters of 2003, the Series Y Investors converted 14,000
shares of Series Y Preferred Stock into 35,140,012 shares of the Company’s
common stock (including shares issued as dividends).
In
January 2004, 6,000 shares of Series X Preferred Stock were converted into
33,333,333 shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion price of $0.18
per share and, in accordance with the terms of the Series X Preferred Stock, the
Company elected to pay accrued dividends approximating $1,560 by issuing
2,316,832 shares of its common stock, based on the average fair market value for
the ten days preceding the conversion of $0.67 per share.
In
February 2004, the remaining 1,000 shares of Series Y Preferred Stock were
converted into 2,260,910 shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion
price of $0.4423 per share and, in accordance with the terms of the Series Y
Preferred Stock, the Company elected to pay accrued
DSL.net,
Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(continued)
(Unaudited)
(Dollars
in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
dividends
approximating $221 by issuing 309,864 shares of its common stock, based on the
average fair market value for the ten days preceding the conversion of $0.71 per
share.
As a
result of the above described conversions of 6,000 shares of Series X Preferred
Stock and 1,000 shares of Series Y Preferred stock during the first quarter of
2004, the Company was required to accelerate the unaccreted beneficial
conversion feature (“BCF”) related to such shares, which amounted to an
additional $2,850 of preferred stock accretion charged in the first quarter of
2004.
The
Series X Preferred Stock and Series Y Preferred Stock activity during the three
months ended March 31, 2004 is summarized as follows:
|
|
Mandatorily |
|
|
|
Redeemable
Convertible Preferred Stock |
|
|
|
Series
X |
|
Series
Y |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
Amount |
|
Shares |
|
Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
December 31, 2003 |
|
|
20,000
|
|
$ |
16,231 |
|
|
1,000 |
|
$ |
788 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion
of Series Y Preferred Stock to common stock |
|
|
(6,000 |
) |
|
(6,000 |
) |
|
(1,000 |
) |
|
(1,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment
of dividends on converted Series Y Preferred Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
(1,560 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(221 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued
dividends on Series X and Y Preferred Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
480 |
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion
of beneficial conversion feature of Series X
and
Y Preferred Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
3,029 |
|
|
|
|
|
423 |
|
Balance
March 31, 2004 |
|
|
14,000 |
|
$ |
12,180 |
|
|
— |
|
$ |
— |
|
As more
fully described in the Company’s audited
financial statements and related notes included in its
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, the remaining
14,000 shares of Series X Preferred Stock were converted into 89,487,917 shares
of the Company’s common stock (including shares issued as payment for accrued
dividends) during the third quarter of 2004. As a result, there were no
outstanding shares of Series X or Series Y Preferred Stock at March 31, 2005 or
December 31, 2004.
9. Related
Party Transactions
The
Company had no related party transactions during the first quarter of 2005. For
further information regarding related party transactions as of December 31,
2004, refer to the Company’s consolidated financial statements and footnotes
thereto included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2004.
(Dollars
in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
Item
2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
The
following discussion of the financial condition and results of operations of
DSL.net, Inc. should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and
the related notes thereto included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q and the audited financial statements and notes thereto and Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004,
which has been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
“SEC”).
Overview
Our
Business.
We
provide high-speed data communications, Internet access, and related services to
small and medium sized businesses and branch offices of larger businesses and
their remote office users, throughout the United States, primarily utilizing
digital subscriber line (“DSL”) and T-1 technology. In September 2003, we
expanded our service offerings to business customers in the Washington, D.C.
metropolitan region to include integrated voice and data services using voice
over Internet protocol technology (“VoIP”). In February 2004, we introduced our
VoIP and data bundles in the New York City metropolitan area. Our networks
enable data transport over existing copper telephone lines at speeds of up to
1.5 megabits per second. Our product offerings also include Web hosting, domain
name system management, enhanced e-mail, on-line data backup and recovery
services, firewalls, nationwide dial-up services, private frame relay services
and virtual private networks.
We sell
directly to businesses through our own sales force utilizing a variety of sales
channels, including referral channels such as local information technology
professionals, application service providers and marketing partners. We also
sell directly to third party resellers whose end-users are typically
business-class customers. We deploy our own local communications equipment
primarily in select first and second tier cities. In certain markets where we
have not deployed our own equipment, we
utilize the local facilities of other carriers to provide our
service.
Our
Challenges and Opportunities.
Our
business is in transition from an earlier strategy focused primarily on growth
to a strategy focused primarily on financial performance. In 2003, in an effort
to expand our network footprint, customer base and product offerings, we
completed the acquisitions of substantially all of the assets and operations of
Network Access Solutions Corporation (“NAS”), and TalkingNets, Inc. and its
affiliate (collectively, “TalkingNets”). The NAS acquisition significantly
increased our facilities-based network in central offices from Virginia to
Massachusetts. The TalkingNets acquisition provided us the ability to offer, in
the business-intensive, Mid-Atlantic and Northeast regions, carrier-class
integrated voice and data services utilizing VoIP technology. We completed the
integration of both of these acquisitions into our operations during 2004.
During
2004 we focused on reducing operating losses and increasing gross margins. On
March 25 and September 21, 2004, we implemented reductions-in-force of 62 and 32
employees, respectively, as part of our cost reduction measures. In connection
with this latter reduction-in-force, during the third quarter of 2004, we began
implementing a new sales and marketing strategy by reorganizing our inside sales
force, reducing funding for certain sales and marketing activities, and
re-directing our focus to sales of multi-line accounts and sales of higher
margin services, including our integrated voice and data services and T-1 data
services. As a result of these and
(Dollars
in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
other
cost-savings measures, we achieved positive operating cash flow results in the
fourth quarter of 2004 for the first time in our history. However, our cost
reduction measures, and particularly, our sales force reductions, have placed,
and continue to place, downward pressure on our ability to sustain or grow our
revenue base. Additionally, like many of our competitors, we
experience a degree of customer disconnects or “churn” due to competitive
pricing pressures and other factors, which churn is in excess of the rate that
we are currently acquiring new customers. In response to this, we have
implemented a program pursuant to which our customer retention representatives
proactively endeavor to renew existing customers to service agreements prior to
or at the time of initial term expiration. While we are taking measures to
control customer churn, our
ability to generate and sustain positive operating cash flow will be dependent,
in large part, on our ability to obtain additional funding to support our
working capital needs and increase our sales and customer acquisition
activities, while continuing to further control our operating costs. There can
be no assurance that we will be able to obtain additional funding, increase our
sales or further control our operating costs in future periods, or, if we do
raise additional funds, that we will generate incremental revenue in excess
of revenue lost through customer churn (see “Liquidity and Capital
Resources,” discussed below).
While the
foregoing operational and market factors pose significant challenges for our
business, we believe our current operating results, facilities-based voice and
data network and established customer base favorably position us to leverage
opportunities in our industry, provided we obtain the additional financing
required to support our operations and growth strategy.
Operating
Cash Flow. Our
operating cash flow for the first quarter of 2005 was negative $1,429, a 56%
improvement over operating cash flow of negative $3,278 for the first quarter of
2004. Our operating cash flow for the year ended December 31, 2004 was negative
$7,541, a 45% improvement over operating cash flow of negative $13,715 for the
year ended December 31, 2003.
Greater
Utilization of our Network to Drive Higher Margins. We have
an extensive facilities-based network with the major portion of our footprint in
the densest business communications corridor in the country. We continue to
prioritize the sale and renewal of services provisioned directly over our
network and the sale and renewal of T-1 and integrated voice and data services,
all of which yield higher margins.
New
Market Opportunities. We
believe that there continues to be significant revenue growth opportunities for
our data/Internet access services and our VoIP suite of integrated voice and
data services. However, we will need additional funding to grow our sales
channels, further expand our voice network and fund customer acquisitions in
order to permit us to capitalize on these growth opportunities.
In
addition to pursuing additional financing to support our operations and fund
cost-effective growth for our business, we continue to explore various strategic
opportunities that would accelerate our growth and/or improve our operating
performance (including potential customer acquisitions), and merger and
acquisition opportunities. In many cases, we engage in discussions and
negotiations regarding such potential transactions. Our discussions and
negotiations may not result in a transaction. Further, if we effect any such
transaction, it may not result in a positive impact upon our operating results
or financial performance.
Critical
Accounting Policies, Estimates and Risks
Management’s
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations are
based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The preparation of
financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities, including the recoverability of tangible and
intangible assets, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the
date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting periods. The
(Dollars
in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
markets
for our services are characterized by intense competition, rapid technological
development, regulatory and legislative changes, and frequent new product
introductions, all of which could impact the reported amounts and future value
of our assets and liabilities.
We
evaluate our estimates on an on-going basis. The most significant estimates
relate to revenue recognition, goodwill, intangible assets and other long-lived
assets, the allowance for doubtful accounts, the fair value of financial
instruments and derivatives, and contingencies and litigation. We base our
estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we
believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the
basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities
that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ
materially from those estimates.
The
following is a brief discussion of the critical accounting policies and methods
and the judgments and estimates used by us in their application:
Revenue
Recognition.
We
recognize revenue in accordance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No.
104, “Revenue
Recognition,” which
outlines the four basic criteria that must be met before revenue can be
recognized: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (2) delivery has
occurred or services have been rendered; (3) the fee is fixed or determinable;
and (4) collectibility is reasonably assured. Determination of criteria (3) and
(4) are based on management’s judgments regarding the fixed nature of the fee
charged for services rendered and products delivered and the collectibility of
those fees. Subjectivity and uncertainties are inherent in making such judgments
that could result in an overstatement or understatement of
revenues.
Revenue
is recognized pursuant to the terms of each contract on a monthly service fee
basis, which varies based on the speed of the customer’s Internet connection and
the services ordered by the customer. The monthly fee includes phone line
charges, Internet access charges, the cost of any leased equipment installed at
the customer's site and fees for the other services we provide, as applicable.
Revenue that is billed in advance of the services provided is deferred until the
services are rendered. Revenue related to installation charges is also deferred
and amortized to revenue over 18 months which is the expected customer
relationship period. Installation direct costs incurred (up to the amount of
deferred revenue) are also deferred and amortized to expense over 18 months. Any
excess of direct costs over installation charges are charged to expense as
incurred. In certain instances, we negotiate credits and allowances for service
related matters. We establish a reserve against revenue for credits of this
nature based on historical experience. Also, from time to time we offer sales
incentives to our customers in the form of rebates toward select installation
services and customer premise equipment. We establish a reserve based on
historical experience for such estimated rebate costs, with a corresponding
reduction to revenue and deferred revenue, as applicable. Establishing such
reserves requires subjective judgments and estimates primarily pertaining to the
number and amounts of such credits, allowances and rebates. Actual results may
differ from our estimates that could result in an overstatement or
understatement of revenues.
We seek
to price our services competitively. The market for high-speed data
communications services and Internet access is rapidly evolving and intensely
competitive. While many of our competitors and potential competitors enjoy
competitive advantages over us, we are pursuing a significant market that, we
believe, is currently under-served. During the past several years, market prices
for many telecommunications services and equipment have been declining, a trend
that might continue. Although pricing is an important part of our strategy, we
believe that our direct relationships with our customers and consistent, high
quality service and customer support are key to generating and maintaining
customer loyalty.
(Dollars
in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
Goodwill,
Intangible Assets and Other Long-Lived Assets.
Other
long-lived assets, such as identifiable intangible assets, are amortized over
their estimated useful lives. We account for these long-lived assets (excluding
goodwill) in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(“SFAS”) No. 144, “Accounting
for the Impairment of Long-lived Assets and for Long-lived Assets to be Disposed
of,” which
requires that long-lived assets and certain intangible assets be reviewed for
impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount may not be recoverable such as technological changes or
significant increased competition. If undiscounted expected future cash flows
are less than the carrying value of the assets, an impairment loss is to be
recognized based on the fair value of the assets, calculated using a discounted
cash flow model. The resulting impairment charge reflects the excess of the
asset’s carrying cost over its fair value. We have not taken any impairment
charges against our long lived assets since adoption of SFAS 144 in 2002. There
is inherent subjectivity and judgments involved in cash flow analyses such as
estimating revenue and cost growth rates, residual or terminal values and
discount rates, which can have a significant impact on the amount of any
impairment. Also, if market conditions become less favorable, future cash flows
(the key variable in assessing the impairment of these assets) may decrease and
as a result we may be required to recognize impairment charges in the
future.
Effective
January 1, 2002, we adopted SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets.” This
statement requires that the amortization of goodwill be discontinued and instead
an impairment approach be applied. If impairment exists, under SFAS No. 142, the
resulting charge is determined by the recalculation of goodwill through a
hypothetical purchase price allocation of the fair value and reducing the
current carrying value to the extent it exceeds the recalculated goodwill. The
impairment tests were performed initially upon adopting SFAS 142 and annually
thereafter and were based upon the fair value of reporting units rather than an
evaluation of the undiscounted cash flows. We estimated the fair value of the
goodwill based on discounted forecasts of future cash flows. There is inherent
subjectivity and judgments involved in cash flow analyses such as estimating
revenue and cost growth rates, residual or terminal values and discount rates,
which can have a significant impact on the amount of any impairment. We did not
record any goodwill impairment adjustments resulting from our impairment reviews
since adoption of SFAS 142 in 2002.
Allowance
for Doubtful Accounts.
We
maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from
the inability of our customers to make required payments. Such allowance
requires management’s estimates and judgments and is computed based on
historical experience using varying percentages of aged receivables. Actual
experience may differ from our estimates and require larger or smaller charges
to income. We primarily sell our services directly to end users mainly
consisting of small to medium sized businesses, but we also sell our services to
certain resellers, such as to Internet service providers (“ISPs”). We believe
that we do not have significant exposure or concentrations of credit risk with
respect to any given customer. However, if the country or any region we service
experiences an economic downturn, the financial condition of our customers could
be adversely affected, which could result in their inability to make payments to
us. This could require additional provisions for doubtful accounts and an
increase in the allowance. In addition, a negative impact on revenue related to
those customers may occur.
With the
acquisition of the NAS assets on January 10, 2003, we acquired a number of end
users, some of whom we service indirectly through various ISPs. We sell our
services to such ISPs who then resell such services to the end users. We have
some increased exposure and concentration of credit risk pertaining to such
ISPs. However, no individual customer accounted for more than 5% of
(Dollars
in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
revenue
for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, or more than
10% of accounts receivable at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004.
Inventory.
Inventories
consist of modems and routers (generally referred to as customer premise
equipment), which are required to establish a high-speed DSL or T-1 digital
connection. We either sell or lease such equipment to our customers. Inventories
are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost of inventory is determined on
the “first-in, first-out” or average cost methods. We establish inventory
reserves for excess, obsolete or slow-moving inventory based on changes in
customer demand, technology developments and other factors. Such reserves
require management’s estimates and judgments primarily relating to forecasts of
future usage which could vary from actual results and require adjustments to our
estimated reserves.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments and Derivatives.
We have
issued various debt and equity instruments, some of which have required a
determination of their fair value, where quoted market prices were not published
or readily available. We base our determinations on valuation techniques that
require judgments and estimates, including discount rates used in applying
present value analyses, the length of historical look-backs used in determining
the volatility of our stock, expected future interest rate assumptions and
probability assessments. From time to time, we may hire independent valuation
specialists to perform and or assist in the fair value determination of such
instruments. Actual results may differ from our estimates and assumptions which
may require adjustments to the fair value carrying amounts and result in a
charge or credit to our statement of operations.
Recently
Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In
September 2004, the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) issued EITF Issue No.
04-10, “Applying Paragraph 19 of FASB Statement No. 131,
‘Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information,’
in
Determining whether to Aggregate Operating Segments that do not Meet the
Quantitative Thresholds.” EITF No. 04-10 presents guidelines for two alternative
approaches in determining whether to aggregate operating segments and is
effective for fiscal years ending after October 13, 2004. EITF No. 04-10 did not
have an impact on our operating segment disclosures.
On
December 16, 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB
Statement No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based
Payment” (“SFAS
123R”), which is a revision of Statement No. 123, “Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation” (“SFAS
123”), supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting
for Stock Issued to Employees,” and
amends FASB Statement No. 95, “Statement
of Cash Flows.”
Generally, the approach in SFAS 123R is similar to the approach described in
SFAS 123. However, SFAS 123R requires all share-based payments to employees,
including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the income
statement based on their fair values. Pro forma disclosure is no longer an
alternative.
Under
SFAS 123R, we must determine the appropriate fair value model to be used for
valuing share-based payments, the amortization method for compensation cost and
the transition method to be used at the date of adoption. The transition
alternatives include retrospective and prospective adoption methods. Under the
retrospective method, prior periods may be restated based on the amounts
previously recognized under SFAS 123 for purposes of pro forma disclosures
either for all periods presented or as of the beginning of the year of adoption.
The
prospective method requires that compensation expense be recognized beginning
with the effective date, based on the requirements of SFAS 123R, for all
share-based payments granted after
(Dollars
in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
the
effective date, and based on the requirements of SFAS 123, for all awards
granted to employees prior to the effective date of SFAS 123R that remain
unvested on the effective date.
The
provisions of this statement are effective as of the beginning of the first
annual reporting period that begins after June 15, 2005. We expect to adopt the
standard on January 1, 2006. We are evaluating the requirements of SFAS 123R and
have not determined its method of adoption or its impact on our financial
condition or results of operations.
In
December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS 153, “Exchange
of Non-monetary Assets, an amendment of APB Opinion No 29” (“SFAS
153”). SFAS 153 eliminates the exception for non-monetary exchanges of similar
productive assets, which were previously required to be recorded on a carryover
basis rather than a fair value basis. Instead, this statement provides that
exchanges of non-monetary assets that do not have commercial substance be
reported at carryover basis rather than a fair value basis. A non-monetary
exchange is considered to have commercial substance if the future cash flows of
the entity are expected to change significantly as a result of the exchange. The
provisions of this statement are effective for non-monetary asset exchanges
occurring in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. We expect to adopt
the standard on July 1, 2005. We are evaluating the requirements of SFAS 153 and
have not determined its impact on our financial condition or results of
operations.
Results
of Operations
Revenue. Revenue
for the three months ended March 31, 2005 decreased by 13% to approximately
$15,440 from approximately $17,820 for the three months ended March 31, 2004.
The
decrease in revenue resulted mainly from a decrease in the number of customers
subscribing to our services, primarily attributable to the combined effect of
customer churn and the reduction in our sales force implemented in
2004.
Network
Expenses. Our
network expenses include costs related to network engineering and network field
operations personnel, costs for telecommunications lines between customers,
central offices, network service providers and our network, costs for rent and
power at our central offices, costs to connect to the Internet, costs of
customer line installations and the costs of customer premise equipment when
sold to our customers. We lease high-speed lines and other network capacity to
connect our central office equipment and our network. Costs incurred to connect
to the Internet are expected to vary as the volume of data communications
traffic generated by our customers varies.
Network
expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2005 decreased by approximately
$2,130 (17%) to approximately $10,069 from approximately $12,199 for the three
months ended March 31, 2004. This decrease was primarily attributable to
decreases in telecommunication expenses of approximately $1,540, decreases in
network personnel expenses of approximately $338, and decreases in subcontract
labor expenses of approximately $309, partially offset by net increases in
miscellaneous other expenses of approximately $57.
We have
entered into interconnection agreements with traditional local telephone
companies. The agreements generally have terms of one to two years and are
subject to certain renewal and termination provisions by either party, generally
upon 30 days’ notification. We have renewed such agreements beyond their initial
terms in the past and anticipate that we will do so in the future. Future
interconnection agreements may contain terms and conditions less favorable to us
than those in our current agreements and could increase our costs of operations,
particularly when there are changes to the federal or state legal requirements
applicable to such agreements.
In
February 2005, the Federal Communications Commission (the “FCC”) issued its
Triennial Review Remand Order (the “TRRO”) and adopted new rules, effective
March 11, 2005, governing
(Dollars
in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
the
obligations of incumbent local exchange carriers (“ILECs”) to afford access to
certain of their network elements, if at all, and the cost of such facilities.
Among other things, the TRRO reduces the ILECs’ obligations to provide
high-capacity DS1 loops and DS1 and DS3 dedicated transport facilities between
certain ILEC wire centers that are deemed to be sufficiently competitive, based
upon the number of fiber collocators or the number of business access lines
within such wire centers. The TRRO eliminates, over time, the ILECs’ obligations
to provide these high-capacity circuits to competitive local exchange carriers
(“CLEC”) like us at the discounted rates CLECs have historically received under
the 1996 Telecommunications Act. Beginning in March 2005, the costs for those of
our existing high-capacity circuits impacted by the FCC’s new rules increased by
15%. By March 10, 2006, we will be required to transition those existing
facilities to alternative arrangements, such as other competitive facilities or
the higher-priced “special access services” offered by the ILECs. Additionally,
subject to any contractual protections we may have under our existing
interconnection agreements with ILECs, beginning March 11, 2005, we will incur
the ILECs’ higher “special access” pricing for any new installations of DS1
loops and/or DS1 and DS3 transport facilities in the impacted ILEC wire centers.
Although we are currently assessing the potential impact of these price
increases on our network operating expenses, as well as evaluating network
configuration alternatives that may help minimize the impact of these increases,
we currently estimate that our network operating expense will increase by
approximately $20 per month as a result of the March 2005 pricing
changes.
Operations
Expenses. Our
operations expenses include costs related to customer care, customer
provisioning, customer billing, customer technical assistance, purchasing,
headquarters facilities operations, operating systems maintenance and support
and other related overhead expenses.
Operations
expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2005 decreased to approximately
$1,765, from approximately $3,189 for the three months ended March 31, 2003.
This decrease of approximately $1,424 (45%) was primarily attributable to
decreases in operations personnel expenses of approximately $784, decreases in
temporary and outsourced services of approximately $339, decreases in equipment
maintenance and support costs of approximately $109, decreases in licenses and
fees of approximately $83, decreases in office expenses of approximately $40,
decreases in travel expenses of approximately $29 and net decreases in
miscellaneous other operations expenses of approximately $40.
General
and Administrative. Our
general and administrative expenses consist primarily of costs relating to human
resources, finance, executive, administrative services, recruiting, insurance,
public reporting, legal and auditing services, leased office facilities rent and
bad debt expenses.
General
and administrative expenses were approximately $2,707 for the three months ended
March 31, 2005, compared to general and administrative expenses for the three
months ended March 31, 2004 of approximately $2,927. This decrease of
approximately $220 (7%) was primarily due to decreases in salaries and benefits
of approximately $138, professional services and fees of approximately $116, and
bad debt expense of approximately $74, partially offset by net increases in
licenses and fees of approximately $73 and net increases in miscellaneous other
expenses of approximately $35.
Sales
and Marketing. Our sales
and marketing expenses consist primarily of expenses for personnel, the
development of our brand name, promotional materials, direct mail advertising
and sales commissions and incentives.
Sales and
marketing expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2005 decreased by
approximately $1,913 (82%) to approximately $430, from sales and marketing
expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2004 of approximately $2,343. This
decrease was primarily attributable to decreased salaries, benefits and
commissions of approximately $1,397, decreased
(Dollars
in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
referral
fees of approximately $224, decreased advertising and direct mail of
approximately $223, and decreased miscellaneous expenses of approximately $68.
Stock
Compensation. We had
no stock compensation expense for the three months ended March 31, 2005 or the
three months ended March 31, 2004. However, beginning January 1, 2006, we will
be required to record stock compensation expense in accordance with SFAS 123R
which requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of
employee stock options, to be recognized in the statement of operations based on
their fair values. Pro forma disclosure is no longer an alternative (see “Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements,” discussed above).
As of
March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, options to purchase 38,562,713 and
40,651,934 shares of common stock, respectively, were outstanding, which were
exercisable at weighted average exercise prices of $0.67 per share and $0.82 per
share, respectively.
Depreciation
and Amortization. Depreciation
and amortization is primarily attributable to the following: (i) depreciation of
network and operations equipment and Company-owned modems and routers installed
at customer sites, (ii) depreciation of information systems and computer
hardware and software, (iii) amortization and depreciation of the costs of
obtaining, designing and building our collocation space and corporate facilities
and (iv) amortization of intangible capitalized costs pertaining to acquired
businesses and customer line acquisitions.
Depreciation
and amortization expenses were approximately $2,000 for the three months ended
March 31, 2005, compared to depreciation and amortization expenses of
approximately $3,318 for the three months ended March 31, 2004. The 40% decrease
in depreciation and amortization expenses of approximately $1,318 was primarily
attributable to certain intangible and fixed assets having become fully
depreciated and amortized during the last twelve months.
Depreciation
expense pertaining to assets for our network and operations was approximately
$1,824 and $2,766 for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004,
respectively. Depreciation and amortization expenses pertaining to assets
related to general and administrative expenses were approximately $176 and $552
for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Our
identified intangible assets consist of customer lists, which are amortized over
two years. Amortization expense of intangible assets (included in depreciation
and amortization expenses discussed above) for the three months ended March 31,
2005 and 2004, was approximately $29 and $267, respectively. Accumulated
amortization of customer lists as of March 31, 2005 and 2004 was approximately
$15,465 and $14,763, respectively. The
unamortized balance of customer lists as of March 31, 2005, of approximately $18
will be fully amortized during 2005.
Interest
Expense, Net. Net
interest expense of approximately $2,109 for the three months ended March 31,
2005 included approximately $2,150 of interest expense, which was partially
offset by approximately $41 in interest income. Net interest expense of
approximately $981 for the three months ended March 31, 2004 included
approximately $1,014 of interest expense, which was partially offset by
approximately $33 of interest income. The increase in net interest expense of
approximately $1,136 was primarily attributable to (i) increased amortization of
deferred non-cash financing costs of approximately $1,000 which related to the
warrants issued as part of our July 2003 note and warrant financing, (ii)
increased interest expense of approximately $75 pertaining to the minimum
borrowing note we issued to Laurus Master Fund, Ltd. in connection with our
October 2004 note and warrant financing, and (iii) amortization of the non-cash
financing costs related to the October 2004 note and warrant financing of
approximately $63, partially offset by lower interest expense of approximately
$2 pertaining to capital leases.
Other
Income (Expense), Net. For the
three months ended March 31, 2005, net other income of approximately $138
represented non-cash mark to market adjustments on financial
instrument
(Dollars
in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
derivatives.
For the three months ended March 31, 2004, net other income of approximately $74
represented miscellaneous income.
Restructuring.
We had no
restructuring charges during the first quarter of 2005 and had no restructuring
reserve balance at March 31, 2005 or at December 31, 2004. In March
2004, we reduced our workforce by 62 employees at our locations in New Haven,
Connecticut; Herndon, Virginia; Minneapolis, Minnesota and Wilmington, North
Carolina. As a result, we incurred approximately $160 in restructuring charges
pertaining to severance and benefits payments. Also, during the first quarter of
2004, we charged approximately $156 against our restructuring reserves which
related to facilities expense associated with our vacated office space in Santa
Cruz, California.
Net
Loss. Net loss
was approximately $3,502 and $7,063 for the three months ended March 31, 2005
and 2004, respectively.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
We have
financed our capital expenditures, acquisitions and operations primarily with
the proceeds from the sale of stock and from borrowings, including equipment
lease financings. As of March 31, 2005, we had cash and cash equivalents of
approximately $7,995 and working capital of approximately $4,882.
Cash
Used In Operating Activities. Net cash
used in operating activities of $1,429 in the first quarter of 2005 improved by
$1,849 or 56% from $3,278 used in the first quarter of 2004. The improvement in
net cash used for operating activities was primarily due to lower net loss of
approximately $3,561 primarily due to reduced operating expenses resulting from
our cost containment efforts, partially offset by lower non-cash items
including: depreciation and amortization, provisions for bad debt expense, sales
credits and allowances, amortization of debt discount and mark to market
adjustments of approximately $694. Also contributing to the improved operating
cash flow was a larger reduction in accounts receivable of approximately $148
primarily resulting from lower revenues combined with improved collections and
reductions in prepaid and other assets of approximately $937. These improvements
were partially offset by (i) lower net accrued expenses and accounts payable of
approximately $1,769, principally due to payment, subsequent to March 31, 2004,
of previously accrued network costs related to operation of the purchased NAS
assets, and (ii) a net decrease in deferred revenue of approximately $334, due
to deferred amortization of installation revenue exceeding deferred new
installations.
Cash
Provided by (Used) in Investing Activities. Net cash
provided by investing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2005, was
approximately $2,370 resulting from a decrease in restricted cash of
approximately $2,430 partially offset by purchases of equipment of approximately
$60. Net cash used by investing activities of approximately $208 for the three
months ended March 31, 2004, was principally used for purchases of
equipment.
The
development and expansion of our business has required significant capital
expenditures. Capital expenditures primarily for maintenance and/or replacement
equipment, were approximately $60 and $207 for the three months ended March 31,
2005 and 2004, respectively.
The
actual amounts and timing of our future capital expenditures will vary depending
on the speed at which we expand and implement our network and implement service
for our customers. We currently anticipate spending less than $1,000 for capital
expenditures, during the year ending December 31, 2005, primarily for the
maintenance of our network and for minimal replacement equipment. The actual
amounts and timing of our capital expenditures could differ materially both in
amount and timing from our current plans.
(Dollars
in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
Cash
Used by Financing Activities. Net cash
used by financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004
was approximately $25 and $23, respectively, and related to principal payments
under capital lease obligations of approximately $25 and approximately $35
(partially offset by proceeds from the sale of our common stock of $12) for the
respective periods. From time to time we have entered into equipment lease
financing arrangements with vendors. In the aggregate, there was approximately
$25 and $50 outstanding under capital leases at March 31, 2005 and December 31,
2004, respectively.
Cash
Resources and Liquidity Constraints. We intend
to use our cash resources to finance our operating losses, capital expenditures,
lease payments, and working capital requirements, and for other general
corporate purposes. The amounts actually expended for these purposes will vary
significantly depending on a number of factors, including our ability to raise
sufficient additional debt, equity or other capital, market acceptance of our
services, revenue growth, planned capital expenditures, cash generated from
operations, improvements in operating productivity, the extent and timing of
entry into new markets, the introduction of new products or services, the
modification or elimination of certain products or services, and, to the extent
that we seek additional acquisitions of complementary businesses, subscriber
lines and other assets to accelerate our growth, the availability of and prices
paid for acquisitions.
We
experience end-user disconnections, or “churn,” that significantly impact our
ability to sustain or grow our revenue base. End-user churn is the result of
several factors, including (i) recent
consolidation in our industry and higher competition leading to reduced pricing
for the services we offer; (ii) end-users’
closing facilities, moving to new locations or ceasing operations; and (iii)
end-users’ determinations that less robust but lower-priced service offerings
from competitors are sufficient for their needs. While
we are working to reduce our end-user churn, many of the causes of such churn
are beyond our control. In addition, in the absence of our raising additional
funding to finance increased sales and marketing activities and new customer
acquisitions, our end-user churn will continue to exceed the rate at which we
can replace such disconnecting customers. As a result, we anticipate that our
end-user churn in the near term will continue to result in declining revenue and
will adversely affect our cash generated from operations. In the event
that we raise additional funds, there can be no assurance that we will generate
incremental revenue in excess of revenue lost through customer
churn.
Our
actions during 2004 to reduce operating losses included a decision to eliminate
certain sales channels, reorganize our sales force and suspend certain marketing
initiatives. While such actions positively impacted our overall financial
performance during 2004 and the first quarter of 2005, these actions have
placed, and continue to place, downward pressure on our ability to sustain or
grow our revenue base. Additionally, if our end-user churn increases or we are
not able to offset such churn by increases in new sales, we will experience
increasing operating losses and decreasing cash generated from operations in
future periods.
Our
independent registered public accounting firm has noted in their report on our
audited financial statements and related notes included in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 that our sustained operating
losses raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.
Based on our current business plans and projections, we believe that our
existing cash resources and cash expected to be generated from operations will
be sufficient to fund our operating losses, capital expenditures, lease
payments, and working capital requirements at least into the fourth quarter of
2005. As a result, we will need to raise additional financing in 2005, through
some combination of borrowings or the sale of equity or debt securities, in
order to finance our ongoing operating requirements and to enable us to repay
all of our existing long-term debt. We are pursuing financing alternatives to
fund our anticipated cash deficiency and to refinance our existing long-term
debt. We may not be able to raise sufficient additional debt, equity or other
capital on acceptable terms, if at all. Failure to generate sufficient revenues,
contain certain discretionary spending, achieve certain other business plan
objectives, refinance our long-term debt or raise additional funds could have a
material adverse affect on our results of operations,
(Dollars
in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
cash flows and financial position, including our ability to
continue as a going concern, and may require us to significantly reduce,
reorganize, discontinue or shut down our operations.
Our cash
requirements and financial performance, including our ability to achieve and
sustain profitability or become and remain cash flow positive, may vary based
upon a number of factors, including:
· |
our
ability to raise sufficient additional
capital; |
· |
our
business plans or projections change or prove to be inaccurate;
|
· |
our
determination to curtail and/or reorganize our
operations; |
· |
the
development of the high-speed data and integrated voice and data
communications industries and our ability to compete effectively in such
industries; |
· |
the
amount, timing and pricing of customer revenue;
|
· |
our
ability to retain existing customers and associated revenue;
|
· |
the
availability, timing and pricing of acquisition opportunities, and our
ability to capitalize on such
opportunities; |
· |
our
identification of and generation of synergies with potential business
combination candidates, and our ability to close any transactions with
such parties on favorable terms, if at all;
|
· |
commercial
acceptance of our services and our ability to attain expected penetration
within our target markets; |
· |
our
ability to recruit and retain qualified
personnel; |
· |
up
front sales and marketing expenses; |
· |
cost
and utilization of our network components that we lease from other
telecommunications providers and that hinge, in substantial part, on
government regulation that has been subject to considerable flux in recent
years; |
· |
our
ability to establish and maintain relationships with marketing partners;
|
· |
the
successful implementation and management of financial, information
management and operations support systems to efficiently and
cost-effectively manage our operations and growth;
and |
· |
favorable
outcomes of numerous federal and state regulatory proceedings and related
judicial proceedings, including proceedings relating to the 1996
Telecommunications Act. |
There can
be no assurance that we will be able to achieve our business plan objectives or
that we will achieve or maintain cash flow positive operating results. If we are
unable to generate adequate funds from our operations or raise additional funds,
we may not be able to repay our existing debt, continue to operate our network,
respond to competitive pressures or fund our operations. As a result, we may be
required to significantly reduce, reorganize, discontinue or shut down our
operations. Our financial statements do not include any adjustments that might
result from any of the above uncertainties.
(Dollars
in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
Contractual
Obligations. Since
December 31, 2004, there have been no material changes outside of the ordinary
course of our business to the contractual obligations presented in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 pursuant to Item 303 of
Regulation S-K promulgated by the SEC.
Off-balance
Sheet Arrangements
We do not
have any off-balance sheet arrangements.
Forward
Looking Statements
This
report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). The
statements contained in this report which are not historical facts may be deemed
to contain forward-looking statements. These statements relate to future events
or our future financial or business performance, and are identified by
terminology such as “may,” “might,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “scheduled,”
“plan,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “potential,” or
“continue” or the negative of such terms or other comparable terminology. These
statements are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties, many of which
are beyond our control, which could cause actual results to differ materially
from those contemplated in these forward-looking statements. In particular, the
risks and uncertainties include, among other things, those described elsewhere
in this report and under “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2004, which has been filed with the SEC. Existing
and prospective investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these
forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. We undertake
no obligation, and disclaim any obligation, to update or revise the information
contained in this report, whether as a result of new information, future events
or circumstances or otherwise.
Item
3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market
Risk
We have
no derivative financial instruments in our cash and cash equivalents. We invest
our cash and cash equivalents in investment-grade, highly liquid investments,
consisting of commercial paper, bank money markets and certificates of deposit.
We have
financial instrument derivatives recorded at fair value on our financial
statements which we mark to market on a quarterly basis. The fair value
determination includes a factor resulting from the trading price of our common
stock. Accordingly, quarterly fluctuations in the trading price of our common
stock may affect the fair value of these financial instrument derivatives and
require a non-cash adjustment to our statement of financial position and
statement of operations.
Item
4. Controls and Procedures
a)
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.
Under the
supervision and with the participation of our management, including our
principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we have evaluated
the disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Exchange Act, Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly
report on Form 10-Q. Based on this evaluation, the principal executive officer
and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and
procedures were, as of the end of the period covered by this report, effective
to provide reasonable assurances that material information related to the
Company required to be disclosed in our filings and submissions under the
Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.
b)
Changes
in Internal Controls.
There
were no significant changes in our internal controls over financial reporting
that occurred during the last fiscal quarter that materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial
reporting.
Part
II - Other Information
Item
6. Exhibits
Exhibits.
Exhibit
No. |
Exhibit |
10.1*† |
Form
of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement for Directors. |
10.2*† |
Form
of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement for Officers. |
10.3* |
Amendment
No. 8 to Lease, dated as of March 21, 2005, by and between DSL.net, Inc.
and Long Wharf Drive, LLC. |
11.1* |
Statements
of Computation of Basic and Diluted Net Loss Per Share.
|
31.1* |
Certification
Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
31.2* |
Certification
Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
32.1* |
Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
32.2* |
Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
* Filed
herewith.
†
Indicates a management contract or any compensatory plan, contract or
arrangement.
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
DSL.NET,
INC. |
|
|
|
Date: May 12, 2005 |
By: |
/s/ Robert J.
DeSantis |
|
Robert J. DeSantis |
|
Chief
Financial Officer
(Duly
authorized officer and principal financial
officer) |
Exhibit
Index
Exhibit
No. |
Exhibit |
10.1*† |
Form
of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement for Directors. |
10.2*† |
Form
of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement for Officers. |
10.3* |
Amendment
No. 8 to Lease, dated as of March 21, 2005, by and between DSL.net, Inc.
and Long Wharf Drive, LLC. |
11.1* |
Statements
of Computation of Basic and Diluted Net Loss Per Share.
|
31.1* |
Certification
Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
31.2* |
Certification
Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
32.1* |
Certification
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
32.2* |
Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
* Filed
herewith.
†
Indicates a management contract or any compensatory plan, contract or
arrangement.