Back to GetFilings.com
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
- ------------------
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
[ X ] | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
| For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001.
OR
|
[ ] | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period from ________________ to ________________
Commission file number: 000-27387
VOICE MOBILITY INTERNATIONAL, INC.
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Exact name of the Registrant as specified in its charter)
NEVADA | 33-0777819 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization). | (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
13777 Commerce Parkway, Richmond, B.C. Canada V6V 2X3
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
(604) 482-0000
(Issuer's Telephone Number)
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, $.001 Par Value
Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act: None
Check whether the registrant: (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the EXCHANGE ACT during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days:
Yes | X | No | |
| -------------- | | -------------- |
Check if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained in this form, and no disclosure will be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
State issuer's revenues for its most recent fiscal year. $358,191.
State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of a specified date within the past 60 days. (See definition of affiliate in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.)
As of March 26, 2002 the aggregate market value of our voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates was $5,195,265 based on the average bid and ask for such common equity. The calculation does not account for unexercised warrants and unexercised stock options held by non affiliates and affiliates.
ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS
DURING THE PAST FIVE YEARS
Check whether the issuer has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act after the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.
Yes | | No | X |
| -------------- | | -------------- |
APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE REGISTRANTS
At March 26, 2002 we had outstanding 34,248,782 common share equivalents, consisting of 28,148,782 shares of Common Stock, 6,100,000 shares of Common Stock issuable on conversion of all outstanding Exchangeable Shares, represented by one Series A Preferred Stock.
Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (check one):
Yes | | No | X |
| -------------- | | -------------- |
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the following documents are incorporated by reference into this Form 10-K:
Registrant's Report on Form 8-K as filed on March 16, 2000 and all amendments thereto is incorporated into Part II of this Form 10-K.
Information contained in websites referenced in this report are not to be deemed part of this report.
GENERAL INFORMATION
ENFORCEMENT OF LEGAL REMEDIES
Certain officers and directors of Voice Mobility International, Inc. ("Voice Mobility" or the "Company") and other persons involved with our company as professional advisors are resident in Canada. As a result, it may be difficult to effect service within the United States upon such persons or to realize on any judgment by any court of the United States which is predicated on civil liabilities under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "1933 Act"), or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "1934 Act"). There is doubt as to the enforceability in Canada, either in original actions or through enforcement of United States judgments, of liabilities predicated solely upon violations of the 1933 Act or the 1934 Act, or the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Annual Report contains forward-looking statements based on our current expectations about our company and our industry. These forward-looking statements can be identified with text containing words such as "expects", "anticipates", "estimates" and other similar expressions. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of risk factors discussed in this Annual Report. We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements for any reason, even if new information becomes available or other events occur in the future.
Unless otherwise indicated, all references to "$", "US$" or "dollars" in this Annual Report refer to United States dollars and all references to "Cdn$" refer to Canadian dollars. For your convenience, the following table sets forth certain exchange rates based on the noon buying rate in New York City for cable transfers in Canadian dollars as certified for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Such rates are set forth as US dollars per Cdn$1.00.
Period | | | | Rate at |
From | To | Average | High | Low | End of Period |
|
01/01/96 | 12/31/96 | US$0.7332 | US$0.7521 | US$0.7227 | US$0.7296 |
01/01/97 | 12/31/97 | US$0.7220 | US$0.7492 | US$0.6898 | US$0.6991 |
01/01/98 | 12/31/98 | US$0.6740 | US$0.7050 | US$0.6309 | US$0.6522 |
01/01/99 | 12/31/99 | US$0.6730 | US$0.6930 | US$0.6464 | US$0.6929 |
01/01/00 | 12/31/00 | US$0.6731 | US$0.6984 | US$0.6399 | US$0.6669 |
01/01/01 | 12/31/01 | US$0.6357 | US$0.6235 | US$0.6711 | US$0.6289 |
|
Solely for your convenience, we provide some financial information relating to our business in U.S. dollars based on exchange rates indicated. We caution you that the amounts and rates used may not always be consistent with those used in preparation of our Consolidated Financial Statements. Our functional currency is the Canadian dollar. Accordingly, all assets and liabilities, which are denominated in foreign currencies, are translated at the year end exchange rate and revenues and expenses are translated using a weighted average exchange rate for the applicable period. Any exchange gains and losses resulting are presented as cumulative foreign currency translation gains (losses) within other accumulated comprehensive income.
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS.
We are a Nevada corporation, incorporated on October 2, 1997, as Equity Capital Group, Inc., and we are the successor to the voice service and related messaging business founded by Voice Mobility Inc. (commonly known as VMI) in 1993. On June 24, 1999, we changed our name to Voice Mobility International, Inc. (commonly known as VMII). Unless otherwise indicated, all references to Voice Mobility means VMII and its predecessor company, VMI. See Background and Recapitalization.
Our head office is located at 180-13777 Commerce Parkway, Richmond, British Columbia, V6V 2X3. Sales and marketing operations are primarily based out of our Richmond office. Research, development and technical support are based out of our Victoria, British Columbia office. We also have sales staff residing in New York, London, and Halifax. Voice Mobility currently has 38 employees.
Brief History
VMI was incorporated in 1994 as WGT Teleserve Inc., and was originally focused on providing enhanced telecommunications services such as voice mail, fax handling and Internet access to specific vertical markets. In the spring of 1997, we decided to shift focus and began developing a comprehensive enhanced messaging product. Early versions of its messaging products were subsequently released in 1998, 1999 and 2000.
In June 1999, VMI completed a reverse acquisition whereby VMI became a wholly owned subsidiary of Nevada-based VMII. At that point we effectively commenced operations as a US company and began trading on the OTCBB under the symbol VMII. Between the period of June 1999 and April 2001 we raised approximately US$12 million, mostly from private investors, to fund our development initiatives and operations.
In April 2001, we completed a Cdn$13 million equity financing and subsequently began trading on the Toronto Stock Exchange in July under the symbol VMY.
Business Overview
We are engaged in the messaging area of the telecommunications market. Our Enhanced Messaging software suite allows for legacy voice-mail replacement and incremental offerings such as real time call connect, voice-mail to e-mail, and fax to e-mail services. These unified communication services are facilitated by the creation of a single personal digital mailbox that can receive any type of communication regardless of its incoming format or medium. Currently, with the proliferation of personal communication devices, such as cell phones, PDA's and laptops, the considerable challenge of managing the information retrieval process from these devices has arisen. Users of these multiple communication methods are increasingly demanding a means of managing them. Our offering addresses these demands through providing users access to their messages anytime, anywhere via any device.
The mobile workforce is growing rapidly, and we expect that as it continues to grow, workers will increasingly demand instant access to voice-mails, faxes and e-mails regardless of which device they have available or their physical location. Subscribers to our service can call a single telephone number that is associated with all other personal contact numbers. The system will cycle through personal numbers until it finds the subscriber. The call is then connected in real time to the subscriber. All messages are gathered in a single box to be reviewed, stored, forwarded, or acted upon from any access device. Fax messages can also be directed to a secondary fax machine or a temporary fax machine such as one in a client's office or in a hotel.
Our Enhanced Messaging software suite is designed to function on industry standard hardware such as Intel processor-based servers. It also uses peripheral hardware, such as communication boards, based upon open system architectures, which support basic standards. This ensures compatibility with legacy equipment, which allows new customers to use the system without being required to decommission their existing older equipment.
Core Product Offerings
Our Enhanced Messaging software suite of services include five core service packages: Legacy Voice-mail Replacement, Real Time Call Connect, Voice-mail to E-mail, Fax to E-mail, and a Single Unified Mailbox. The enhanced messaging platform is a combination of our Enhanced Messaging software suite installed on recommended hardware in a specified configuration. We can provide a complete solution including hardware, system configuration, migration, operating support system integration and billing support system integration or simply supply the software with hardware and configuration recommendations.
Legacy Voice-mail Replacement is the ability to replace existing voice-mail systems currently operating in production environments. This replacement can be achieved by a full-scale service cut-over or an incremental service cut-over. We have the ability to interface with existing "legacy" voice-mail systems, allowing for the transfer of messages between systems.
Real Time Call Connect is the ability for subscribers to merge all their wired and wireless communications, cellular telephone, pager, fax, home and office numbers, into a single unified phone number.
Voice-mail to E-mail is the ability to route voice-mail messages to a single e-mail mailbox or multiple e-mail mailboxes. This service gives the subscriber the ability to choose the method of retrieving voice-mail messages, through e-mail, traditional retrieval methods, or e-mail enabled wireless devices.
Fax to E-mail is the ability to receive faxes through the subscriber's one number and have them delivered to one or more e-mail mailboxes. The subscriber then has the power to determine if and where the fax is printed. Our Fax-to-E-mail service converts faxes to e-mail attachments, and allows subscribers to view them on-screen, print, save, or forward them. This functionality essentially eliminates the need for fax machines and dedicated lines, and it also minimizes the privacy concerns with respect to communal fax machines. Our suite is also capable of providing fax notification via pagers.
Single Unified Mailbox gives subscribers options on managing and retrieving their messages. The Voice Mobility service is e-mail neutral, so any e-mail application on the market today can be configured as the subscribers unified mailbox. In addition, subscribers are not forced to change their e-mail addresses.
Customers may license one or more of these services or chose to purchase the entire Enhanced Messaging software suite.
Approach to Market
We focus on three distinct customer groups: service providers, wholesalers and resellers. We are focused on establishing channel, system integrator and OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer) distribution relationships with industry-leading partners, in addition to its direct sales campaign, to target each customer group. We feel that a mixture of direct and indirect sales is the most cost-effective and efficient way to quickly build market share. To date we have secured Aliant Inc. as a channel in Eastern Canada.
Of the three customer segments, we believe service providers represent the largest opportunity for us. Tier 1 service providers in particular tend to have large existing installed bases of voice-mail users. Their legacy voice-mail services are still growing between 10% and 20% per year; the bulk of this growth coming from wireless growth and consumer adoption. The Tier I market currently is looking for methods to limit spending in legacy voice-mail technology that is between 10 and 15 years old and methods to implement enhanced messaging technology.
Our implementation plan has two macro stages. First, we believe that Tier I providers, no longer willing to invest in legacy systems, will be required to replace legacy systems while at the same time the market will be requiring that they offer and implement enhanced messaging technology solutions. Thus, at the first stage, the provider would install our enhanced messaging platform and migrate their current voice-mail customers over to the new platform without interruption in service. Second, the provider would begin to incrementally market the value-added service available as part of enhanced messaging, such as our Real Time Call Connect, Voice Mail to Email and Fax to Email offerings. To support our customers, we have developed significant research that identifies end users' perceptions of enhanced messaging features, pricing tolerance and willingness to buy. This information will assist service providers in effectively marketing enhanced messaging services to their customer
base.
We currently believe that there may be further opportunities for the deployment of our applications through the consolidation presently occurring amongst telecommunications service providers. As such organizations and networks consolidate, we believe that there likely will be incentives and opportunities to optimize architecture and service delivery platforms. Our messaging products not only facilitate the convergence of, and migration from, legacy systems, they also facilitate the provision of a single mailbox to users with wireline and wireless service.
Pricing Model
To generate revenues, we utilize a selection of pricing models. Customers can purchase the software outright for a one-time license fee in the $2.50-$6.00 per subscriber range based on volumes and services provided, plus a 7.5%-18% annual support and maintenance fee.
Customers would also purchase the hardware required for a one time fee of $1.00 - $3.50 per subscriber based on configuration, architecture, and mix of services offered. Professional services fees for system installation, system integration with OAM&P (Operation, Administration, Maintenance and Provisioning) systems, and migration of existing voicemail subscribers would range between 15% and 25% of the software licensing fees based on the complexity of the installation.
Customers can purchase voice mail licenses to provide services for their growth in end-users, purchase licenses for migration of voicemail customers, and purchase licenses for enhanced messaging services. Our prime target is a Tier 1 carrier that provides messaging services to 100,000 - 10,000,000 end users.
We can provide a fee based solution including system configuration, migration, operating support system integration, and billing support system integration with the assistance of a system integration partner. We can also help to improve growth of the end-user base by providing marketing services for enhanced messaging.
Market Growth Forecasts
The Radicati Group published a report entitled "Unified Messaging Market Trends 2000 - 2004" which calls for substantial growth in the unified messaging market over the next several years. The report forecasts that revenues from the sale of unified messaging products will increase, worldwide, from $264 million in 2000 to $3.76 billion by the end of 2004. The most dramatic network growth will come from the Asia-Pacific region, where market share will grow from 8% to 19% by the end of 2004. The unified messaging installed product base is expected to grow, worldwide, from 3.5 million seats in 2000 to approximately 120 million seats by year-end 2004.
The Radicati report forecasts that in addition to the product sales growth highlighted above, substantial growth will come in the form of services revenue. Radicati forecasts that revenue from unified messaging services will equate to $9.8 billion worldwide by 2004. Europe is expected to display the fastest adoption rate of unified messaging services.
Within the report, Radicati also predicts that the messaging industry will shift from the e-mail, fax and voice-mail integration of unified messaging towards the enhanced functionality capabilities of unified communications offerings (such as our offering). We consider ourselves to be well positioned to capitalize on this forecasted market growth, with its current technology.
Marketing and Distribution.
We sell our products through a combination of a technically proficient direct sales force and independent sales representatives. We also utilize a network of independent sales representatives selected for their familiarity with our potential customers and their knowledge of the telecommunications equipment markets. Both the direct sales personnel and independent sales representatives generate product sales, provide product and customer service, and provide customer feedback for product development. In addition, the sales personnel and independent sales representatives receive support from our marketing, product support and customer service departments. Our marketing efforts are focused on establishing and developing long-term relationships with potential customers. Our customers typically conduct significant technical evaluations of our products before making purchase commitments.
Competition
Well-established suppliers such as Lucent, Comverse, Erickson and Glenayre currently dominate Tier 1 messaging. These competitors have provided voice mail services to both wire line and wireless carriers since the early 1980's. In evaluating the competitive landscape, we believe our closest competitors are companies offering voice-mail and enhanced messaging platforms built to meet the high capacity and high resiliency needs of the telecommunications carrier environment. In this segment, we have identified three core competitors: Comverse, Commworks, and Glenayre. Lucent is also developing a replacement product.
Our products compete on the basis of the following key characteristics: performance, functionality, reliability, pricing, scalability, time-to-market delivery capabilities and compliance with industry standards. While we believe we compete favorably with respect to the foregoing characteristics, there can be no assurance that we will be able to continue to do so.
Some competitors have significantly greater financial, technical, manufacturing, sales, marketing and other resources than us and have achieved greater name recognition for their existing products and technologies than we have. We cannot guarantee that we will be able to successfully increase our market penetration or our overall share of the Enhanced Messaging marketplace. Our results of operations could be adversely impacted if we are unable to effectively increase our share of the Enhanced Messaging marketplace.
Our success depends in large part upon the rate at which Tier 1 carriers incorporate our products into their systems. If we were not successful in increasing the use of our products by the leading Tier 1 carriers, there would be a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
No assurance can be given that our competitors will not develop new technologies or enhancements to existing products or introduce new products that will offer superior price or performance features. We expect our competitors to offer new and existing products at prices necessary to gain or retain market share. Certain of our competitors have substantial financial resources, which may enable them to withstand sustained price competition or a market downturn better than us. There can be no assurance that we will be able to compete successfully in the pricing of our products, or otherwise, in the future.
Industry Description
Difference between Enhanced Messaging, Unified Communications and Unified Messaging.
Enhanced Messaging is designed to replace legacy voice-mail systems. It encompasses enhanced voice-mail and Unified Communications. Compared to legacy voice-mail systems, Enhanced Messaging is built on the latest technology, can handle significantly more users, has a distributed design, and therefore is more scalable and fully interacts with the Internet.
Unified Communications is a messaging feature of Enhanced Messaging. However, the term "Unified Communications" is often used interchangeably with "Unified Messaging". There are many significant differences between the two services. Unified Communications tends to be far more comprehensive and technically challenging than Unified Messaging. It combines non-real-time communications, such as message exchange, with real-time communications, such as call delivery, connectivity, line call management and notification options. The "real-time" aspects are critical components to Unified Communications.
All of the features discussed below should exist in a system in order for it to be considered a true Unified Communications offering:
- One Number/Universal Number: When a caller dials your number a virtual attendant attempts to locate the subscriber.
- Unified Messaging Capabilities: System allows users to access e-mail, voice-mail, and fax messages through a single in-box via telephone or web interface.
- Find Me/Follow Me: Users can specify phone numbers of other locations at which the service will ring.
- Call Screening: Allows users to hear who is calling before answering incoming calls that are forwarded to them.
- Real-time call connection and routing: Upon caller identification, users have the option to accept incoming calls or forward them to voice-mail in real-time.
- Message Notification: Users can be notified of incoming calls and new or urgent messages by voice-mail, e-mail, pager or any wireless device.
Our product currently offers all of the Enhanced Messaging features. We are not aware of any competitor that has developed a messaging solution that incorporates the ability to emulate existing voice mail technology while also providing advanced Unified Communications features and capabilities. Unified Communications vendors have only been deployed as a new service on the periphery of the carriers network.
Significant Customers
In June 2001, we signed a three year contract with Haddad Advanced Technology (www.hatc.com) to market unified communications in Malaysia. During the first year, HATC has committed to a minimum of 6,000 mailboxes per month.
In October 2001, NBTel, a wholly owned subsidiary of Aliant Inc. (www.aliant.ca) which is one of Canada's leading high-tech companies providing integrated communications and IT solutions, installed our UCN 100 v 2.1 and launched its Fax-to-E-mail solution.
Key Strategic Partners
Aliant Inc.: The close working relationship that we have with Aliant serves as a strong endorsement of our company and our technology, and it also represents a significant revenue generating opportunity for us. In September 1999 Innovatia Inc, a wholly owned subsidiary of Aliant Inc., took an equity position in Voice Mobility, and currently holds approximately 2.0 million shares. Aliant and Voice Mobility have worked on joint development initiatives for two years, and in February 2001 they formalized their relationship by announcing their intentions to jointly develop the specifications for a "Next Generation" messaging platform targeted for Tier 1 carriers. This technology will be owned by Voice Mobility. The development initiative will take place within Aliant's state-of-the-art R&D facility known as the LivingLab innovations environment. Aliant's LivingLab provides development support through conducting rigorous testing and customer trials of new technologies, and as
sists in reducing the time-to-market for new technologies.
We expect that the close relationship with Aliant will translate into revenues for us as soon as Q1 of 2002. The intent of the development agreement is that the resulting product will become Aliant's primary hosted solution for business and residential customers. Aliant is Canada's third largest telecommunications company with approximately 800,000 voice-mail customers.
Other important strategic partners include:
Microsoft: We are a member of the Microsoft Certified Service Provider program. This provides us with early access to Microsoft's software.
Dell Computers: Dell is our platform manufacturer, software installer and system tester. Dell's custom factory integration services assist us with installation, efficient delivery and quality assurance.
Telcordia: Telcordia is working with us in collaboration with Aliant and their LivingLAB.
NMS Communications: NMS provides access to a broad range of development resources, sales and marketing.
TARA: We are an associate member of TARA (Telecommunications Applications Research Alliance.) This membership enables us to develop new service applications and products related to communications networks.
International Markets
We believe international markets should offer us strong opportunities in the long-term. Mature markets are seeking replacement technologies to enhance and replace legacy messaging architecture that is reaching the end of its useful life. Emerging markets are being fueled by the very basic need for high performance, low cost telecommunications infrastructure.
We perceive a specific opportunity with telecommunications carriers that are either introducing messaging services to their markets for the first time, or are seeking to supplant incumbent, aging, or manufacturer discontinued platforms with next generation technology that creates new revenue opportunities through the delivery of enhanced features and functionality. We believe the latter market opportunity is supported by our ability to migrate users from an existing messaging platform to our application, in a manner that protects one of the carrier's core revenue streams.
Voice Mobility is currently marketing in Asia, Europe and Latin America, working with and targeting both incumbent and emerging telecommunications service providers. We are engaged with OEM and Systems Integration partners in these international markets as a means to further expand and facilitate market penetration and the acquisition of market share. Key attributes of our applications that facilitate this expansion are the user-friendly ergonomics of the various user interfaces and the ability of our applications to support multi-languages on a single platform.
In the early part of 2002, we have experienced interest and activity from all of the international markets in which we have a presence. As we continue to offer value propositions for incumbent carriers seeking to replace legacy messaging systems, and provide them the opportunity to enhance and expand existing revenue streams with the deployment of enhanced feature sets, and by delivering an enhanced messaging system to carriers initiating their first deployment of messaging services, we believe our presence in, and revenues from, non-North American markets will continue to expand.
Revenues from international operations were $56,200 in fiscal 2001 and $196,573 in fiscal 2000. See note 5 to our consolidated financial statements for financial information by geographic area.
Suppliers
Dell is our platform manufacturer. We currently procure, and expect to continue to procure, certain components from Dell due to unique component designs, quality and performance requirements and volume pricing discounts. If we were to replace Dell as our platform manufacturer we may have to make adjustments to both product designs and production schedules which could result in delays in production and delivery of products. Such delays could have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition.
Research and Development
Our research and development team is primarily located in Victoria, British Columbia. The research and development team also has a research analyst located in an office at the Telecom Applications Research Alliance facility in Halifax. The research and development team designs, develops, tests, documents, and localizes as directed by our product management in our marketing group. The research and development team's business direction on each major feature for each release is detailed in written business requirements created by the business requirements team. A change control board also directs the lower level problems and enhancements for all other development work. Releases are coordinated with both marketing and sales to ensure timely delivery of the grouped features for both the clients and the target market. Appropriate technology is chosen for all work after performing a technical analysis of each requested feature and also ensuring a match for that release's system requ
irements. All development work is carried out with reviews and decision gates as part of an overall product development process. The research and development team follows industry best practices for software engineering and encourages continuous process improvement. Research and development expenses for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999 are $4,618,284, $2,709,048 and $2,250,153 respectfully.
Intellectual Property
We rely on trade secrets to protect our intellectual property. We execute confidentiality and non-disclosure agreements with our employees and limit access to and distribution of our proprietary information. We do not have and do not intend to apply for patents on our products. Management believes that the patent application process in many countries in which we intend to sell products would be time-consuming and expensive and any patent protection may be out of date by the time the patent is granted.
The departure of any of our management or significant technical personnel, the breach of their confidentiality and non-disclosure obligations, or the failure to achieve our intellectual property objectives may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We believe our success depends upon the knowledge and experience of our management and technical personnel and our ability to market our existing products and to develop new products. We do not have non-compete agreements with our employees who are employed on an "at-will" basis. Therefore, employees may and have left us to go to work for a competitor. While we believe that we have adequately protected our proprietary technology, and we will take all appropriate and reasonable legal measures to protect it, the use of our processes by a competitor could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
EMPLOYEES
As of March 26, 2002, we employed 38 people, 11 of who are engaged in marketing and sales, 20 in research, development and support, and 7 in management and administration. We are not subject to any collective bargaining agreements and we consider relations with our employees to be excellent.
RISK FACTORS
OUR BUSINESS FACES SIGNIFICANT RISKS. THE RISKS DESCRIBED BELOW MAY NOT BE THE ONLY RISKS WE FACE. ADDITIONAL RISKS THAT WE DO NOT YET KNOW OF OR THAT WE CURRENTLY THINK ARE IMMATERIAL MAY ALSO IMPAIR OUR BUSINESS OPERATIONS.
The following risks and uncertainties could affect our operating results and financial condition and could cause our actual results to differ materially from our historical results.
Our Business Model is in Its Early Stages and May Not Be as Successful as We Anticipate.
In early 1998, the focus of our predecessor's business by necessity shifted to research and development efforts needed to develop a Windows 2000 platform-based product line. Given this shift in our business focus, even though our predecessor and we have had limited revenues from operations since 1993, we are at an early stage of entering the commercial marketplace. Our future operating results are subject to a number of risks, including our ability to implement our strategic plan, to attract qualified personnel and to raise sufficient financing as required. Our management's inability to guide growth effectively, including implementing appropriate systems, procedures and controls, could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and operating results.
We Are Located in Canada but Do Business Primarily in the U.S., Which Subjects Us to Risks in Exchange Rate Fluctuations.
We face foreign currency exchange risk because a majority of our revenue is denominated in U.S. dollars and a majority of our operating costs are incurred in Canadian dollars. We have derived substantially all of our revenues to external customers from sales by our Canadian operations and substantially all of our assets are located in Canada. Significant fluctuations in the foreign exchange rate between U.S. and Canadian currency will result in fluctuations in our annual and quarterly results. If the Canadian dollar were to strengthen in relation to the U.S. dollar, our effective costs would rise in relation to our revenues, adversely affecting our profitability and competitive position. For information on our revenues by geographic areas, see Note 5 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
We Hold No Patents on Our Technology.
We do not have and do not intend to apply for patents on our products. We rely on trade secrets to protect our intellectual property. Management believes that the patent application process in many countries in which we intend to sell products would be time-consuming and expensive and any patent protection may be out of date by the time the patent is granted.
The departure of any of our management or significant technical personnel, the breach of their confidentiality and non-disclosure obligations, or the failure to achieve our intellectual property objectives may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We believe our success depends upon the knowledge and experience of our management and technical personnel and our ability to market our existing products and to develop new products. Employees may and have left us to go to work for a competitor. While we believe that we have adequately protected our proprietary technology, and we will take all appropriate and reasonable legal measures to protect it, the use of our processes by a competitor could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Our ability to compete successfully and achieve future revenue growth will depend, in part, on our ability to protect our proprietary technology
and operate without infringing upon the rights of others. We may not be able to successfully protect our proprietary technology, and our proprietary technology may otherwise become known or be independently developed by competitors. Competitors' products may add features, increase performance or sell at lower prices. We cannot predict whether our products will continue to compete successfully with such existing rival architectures or whether new architectures will establish or gain market acceptance or provide increased competition with our products.
We May Not Be Able to Obtain Adequate Financing to Implement Our Growth Strategy
Successful implementation of our growth strategy may require continued access to capital. If we do not generate sufficient cash from operations, our growth could be limited unless we are able to obtain capital through additional debt or equity financings. We cannot assure you that debt or equity financings will be available as required. We have incurred significant operating losses that raises substantial doubt about our ability to raise additional financing and to continue as a going concern. Even if financing is available, it may not be on terms that are favorable to us or sufficient for our needs. If we are unable to obtain sufficient financing, we may be unable to fully implement our growth strategy.
We Are Currently Dependent on a Limited Number of Customers
Sales to one customer, Aliant, Inc., comprised 56% of our revenues in fiscal 2001. Sales to three customers comprised 93% of revenues in 2000. Sales to three customers comprised 100% of revenues in 1999. If our business strategy is successful, we expect that we will become less dependent on such significant customers in the future as sales increase. However, if we are unable to successfully diversify our customer base, our business, financial condition and results of operations would be materially and adversely affected.
Our Business Is Subject to Risks Related to Rapid Technological Change, Which Could Increase Cost and Uncertainty.
The telecommunications industry is characterized by rapidly changing technology and evolving industry standards. Our success will depend heavily on our continuing ability to develop and introduce enhancements to our existing systems and new products that meet changing markets. We can make no assurance that our technology or systems will not become obsolete due to the introduction of alternative technologies. If we are unable to continue to innovate successfully, our business and operating results could be adversely affected.
We Operate in a Highly Competitive Industry.
The market for unified messaging software is highly competitive and subject to frequent product introductions with improved price and/or performance characteristics. Even if we are able to introduce products which meet evolving customer requirements in a timely manner, there can be no assurance that our new products will gain market acceptance. Many companies, including CommWorks, Comverse, Glenayre, and Sema Oryx and others, may have greater financial, technical, sales and marketing resources, better name recognition and a larger customer base than ours. In addition, many of our large competitors may offer customers a broader product line which may provide a more comprehensive solution than ours. Increased competition in the unified messaging industry could result in significant price competition, reduced profit margins or loss of market share, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business and profitability.
We Are Exposed To General Economic Conditions.
As a result of recent unfavorable economic conditions, revenues and spending within the North American telecommunications industry may have been adversely affected. If the economic conditions in North America continue or worsen or if a wider or global economic slowdown occurs, we may experience a material adverse impact on our business, operating results, and financial condition.
Economic Conditions in the United States, Canada, and Globally, Affecting the Telecommunications Industry, as well other Trends and Factors Affecting the Telecommunications Industry, Are Beyond our Control and May Result in Reduced Demand and Pricing Pressure on our Products.
There are trends and factors affecting the telecommunications industry, which are beyond our control and may affect our operations. Such trends and factors include:
- adverse changes in the public and private equity and debt markets and our ability, as well as the ability of our customers and suppliers, to obtain financing or to fund working capital and capital expenditures;
- adverse changes in the credit ratings of our customers, potential customers and suppliers;
- adverse changes in the market conditions in our industry and the specific markets for our products;
- visibility to, and the actual size and timing of, capital expenditures by our customers and potential customers;
- inventory practices, including the timing of product and service deployment, of our customers and potential customers;
- policies of our customers and potential customers regarding utilization of single or multiple vendors for the products they purchase;
- the overall trend toward industry consolidation and rationalization among our customers, potential customers, competitors, and suppliers;
- conditions in the broader market for communications products, including data networking products and computerized information access equipment and services;
- the effects of war and acts of terrorism.
Economic conditions affecting the telecommunications industry, which affect market conditions in the telecommunications and networking industry, in the United States, Canada and globally, affect our business. Reduced capital spending and/or negative economic conditions in the United States, Canada, Europe, Asia, Latin America and/or other areas of the world could result in reduced demand for or pricing pressure on our products.
We May be Materially and Adversely Affected by Continued Reductions in Spending on Telecommunications Infrastructure by Our Customers.
A continued slowdown in capital spending by service providers may affect our revenues more than we currently expect. Moreover, the significant slowdown in capital spending by service providers has created uncertainty as to market demand. As a result, revenues and operating results for a particular period can be difficult to predict. In addition, there can be no certainty as to the severity or duration of the current industry adjustment. As a result of the recent changes in industry and market conditions, many of our customers have reduced their capital spending on telecommunications infrastructure. Our revenues and operating results are expected to continue to be affected by the continued reductions in capital spending on telecommunications infrastructure by our customers.
BACKGROUND AND RECAPITALIZATION
Our predecessor company, VMI, was incorporated in 1993, as a British Columbia corporation. In December 1997, the shareholders of VMI entered into a transaction with Acrex Ventures Ltd. ("Acrex"), an inactive company listed on the Vancouver Stock Exchange with no business operations, through which the Voice Mobility business plan would be financed. Prior to entering into the agreement with VMI, Acrex had approximately 150 shareholders, excluding participants in the Acrex private placements.
The proposed transaction with VMI was intended to be a "reverse takeover" by VMI (the "RTO Concept"), and characterized as a recapitalization of VMI for accounting purposes.
Between December 1997 through March 1999, Acrex consummated a series of four private placements undertaken in Canada, and raising an aggregate of Cdn$2,022,500 (approximately $1.4 million). In each private placement, investors were offered units ("Acrex Units") consisting of Acrex common shares and warrants to acquire Acrex common shares. Pending regulatory approval and finalization of the transaction between Acrex and VMI, the net proceeds of such private placements of approximately $1.26 million were loaned to VMI to fund research and development activities, operations, and working capital.
On August 30, 1998, Acrex applied to the Vancouver Stock Exchange to approve its acquisition of VMI as the basis for its first business operations. However, by March 31, 1999, the application had not been approved by the Vancouver Stock Exchange, being still in process, and the share acquisition agreement between Acrex and the VMI shareholders expired. Because of these continuing delays, management of Acrex and VMI decided to pursue other sources of financing to expedite the strategy.
Thus, in March 1999, as an alternative to financing Voice Mobility's business plan through Acrex, the directors and certain principals and shareholders of VMI and Acrex initiated discussions with Equity Capital Group, Inc. ("Equity Capital"), an unrelated Nevada corporation with shares listed on the OTC Bulletin Board. The discussions were focused on structuring a transaction in which the combined shareholders of VMI and Acrex and the investors in the Acrex private placements would acquire control of Equity Capital. Because the Acrex private placements contemplated the combination of VMI and the financing of Voice Mobility's business plan, the principals of VMI and Acrex effectively worked in concert as the effective shareholder or "stakeholder" group implementing the Voice Mobility business plan and the RTO Concept. Further, the three directors controlling VMI, were also Directors of Acrex and effectively controlled the board of directors of Acrex.
Equity Capital's acquisition of VMI was intended to mirror Acrex's application to the Vancouver Stock Exchange in August 1998 to provide the investors in the Acrex private placements with essentially the same economic position in Equity Capital as they would have expected in the acquisition of Voice Mobility by Acrex. This would be accomplished by mirroring the capital structure of Equity Capital to the proposed capital structure of Acrex as proposed to the Vancouver Stock Exchange. Thus, the number of common shares and warrants of Equity Capital which each investor in the Acrex private placements would receive was intended to mirror the number of shares and warrants to have been received in the form of Acrex Units.
On April 1, 1999, certain principals of Voice Mobility Inc. took the first steps to implement the Voice Mobility business plan through Equity Capital by entering into a stock
purchase agreement with Equity Capital and its majority shareholder to acquire an aggregate of 8,418,000 common shares of Equity Capital, representing over 90% of the outstanding common stock of Equity Capital for a cash purchase price of $200,000. Of such 8,418,000 shares, 8,293,000 shares were newly issued shares and 125,000 shares were acquired from Equity Capital's majority shareholder. The $200,000 purchase price was placed in trust with Equity Capital's attorney subject to the closing of Equity Capital's acquisition of Voice Mobility (which was consummated on June 24, 1999 as described below) and other conditions. Among others, the April 1, 1999 agreement also contemplated that Equity Capital would be a "shell" corporation, with no assets or liabilities. From April 1999 to June 24, 1999, Equity Capital completed the assignment of its remaining assets and liabilities to Pioneer Growth Corporation, an unrelated third party. The 8,418,000 shares of Equity Capital were held in trust by attorneys-in-fact fo
r the purchasers subject to the closing of the acquisition of Voice Mobility.
Following April 1, 1999, the original shareholders of Voice Mobility Inc. were advised that they could face significant Canadian income tax liability as a result of a cross-border transaction with the U.S. entity Equity Capital. The shareholders of Voice Mobility Inc. immediately thereafter began to seek legal counsel and tax advisors with sufficient professional experience in such dealings. It took some time to find and retain qualified securities counsel and tax accountants with experience in such transactions. Once the tax accountants and securities lawyers were consulted it was determined that the most effective means of minimizing personal Canadian taxes for the Voice Mobility Inc. shareholders and to comply with Canadian tax legislation, required the formation of a new corporation, Voice Mobility Canada Limited ("VM Canada"), as a wholly owned subsidiary of Equity Capital. The formation of VM Canada took time to complete because certain special share rights had to be properly
structured and drafted, various name searches needed to be conducted, and the company needed to be incorporated and capitalized.
Thus, on June 24, 1999, Equity Capital, through its newly created wholly owned subsidiary, VM Canada, acquired 100% of the outstanding common shares of VMI. In such acquisition, the shareholders of VMI exchanged their shares of VMI for 6,600,000 Exchangeable Shares of VM Canada. Each VM Canada Exchangeable Share is exchangeable for one VMII common share at any time at the option of the shareholder, and will be exchanged no later than July 1, 2009, and is entitled to the same voting, dividend and other rights as one VMII common share. In addition, a share of preferred voting stock was issued to the transfer agent in trust for the holders of the VM Canada Exchangeable Shares, to provide a mechanism for holders of the VM Canada Exchangeable Shares to exercise their voting rights. We consider each Exchangeable Share as equivalent to a share of its common stock. Concurrent with this transaction, Equity Capital changed its name to our current name, Voice Mobility International, Inc.
Following the completion of the acquisition of VMI, on July 1, 1999, the $200,000 purchase price for the 8,418,000 common shares of Equity Capital was released by Equity Capital's attorney.
Following completion of the acquisition of VMI, VMII (formerly Equity Capital) took the next steps in fulfilling Acrex's obligations to its investors under the Acrex private placements. The 8,418,000 shares of Equity Capital held by the attorneys-in-fact were issued as follows: 5,010,907 shares were issued to the Acrex private placement investors, with each of the Acrex private placement investors allowed to participate in such offering substantially pro rata in relation to their participation in Acrex; 2,256,093 shares were issued to certain original shareholders of Acrex; 101,000 shares were issued to an original shareholder of Voice Mobility Inc.; and 1,050,000 shares were issued to certain finders and outside professional advisors who assisted in the consummation of the combined April 1 and June 24 transaction.
On June 30, 1999, VMII completed its undertaking to fulfill Acrex's obligations to its investors under the Acrex private placements by issuing warrants to acquire an aggregate of 4,793,000 shares of Common Stock of VMII to the investors in the Acrex private placements. Such warrants were issued to the investors substantially pro rata to the number of warrants the investors were to have received in each of the Acrex private placements, at the same exercise prices, as adjusted for the currency translation from Canadian dollars to U.S. dollars. Thus, upon completion of transactions, the original investors in the Acrex private placements received, in the aggregate through the April 1999 offering of Common Stock and the June 1999 offering of warrants, substantially the equivalent economic terms in the form of VMII Common Stock and warrants, which they would have received in the Acrex Units. As a result, Acrex discharged its obligations under the private placements.
Upon completion of such transactions at June 24, 1999, the stakeholders in Voice Mobility and Acrex (consisting of the original shareholders of VMI (43%), certain shareholders of Acrex (15%), and the investors in the Acrex private placement (32%)) held approximately 90% of the capital stock of VMII (formerly Equity Capital), thereby constituting a recapitalization of VMI through the acquisition of Equity Capital.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES.
Our United States office is located in shared office premises at Suite 200, 5031 South Ulster Parkway, Denver, Colorado, 80237 under a month-to-month arrangement with the lessor of the premises who is not affiliated with us. We pay no rent under an oral understanding.
We lease the offices of our operating subsidiary, VMI, consisting of approximately 4,900 square feet at 13777 Commerce Parkway, Richmond, BC V6V 2X3 at a basic rate of Cdn$75,950 per year plus expenses. The lease expires on December 31, 2002.
We also lease an engineering facility at 20 - 3318 Oak Street, Victoria, BC, V8X 1R1, of 8,784 square feet, under a lease with an unaffiliated party that expires on May 31, 2004, at Cdn$9,131 per month plus expenses.
We believe that existing facilities are adequate for our needs through at least the end of 2002. Should we require additional space at that time, or prior thereto, we believe that such space can be secured on commercially reasonable terms.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
On April 23, 2001, Breakthrough Financial Marketing Inc., a former consultant to Voice Mobility, issued to us a Notice of Intention to Arbitrate under the Arbitration Act (Alberta), claiming breach of contract by Voice Mobility Inc. and/or Voice Mobility International, Inc. relating to consulting services and registration of stock options. The relief sought by Breakthrough are damages under several causes of action for an aggregate of approximately $900,000 and an order that the consulting contract be renewed, as well as alternative relief in the form of fair value compensation, interest and costs. On September 25, 2001 a settlement was agreed to by both parties with a payment of $109,975 (Cdn. $170,000) to Breakthrough Financial Marketing Inc.
On August 8, 2001, Sharon Ho commenced an action in the Superior Court of California against Voice Mobility International, Inc. and the predecessor corporation, Equity Capital Group, to recover damages as a result of an alleged breach of contract. On October 10, 2001, we entered into an indemnification agreement with the former majority shareholder of Equity Capital Group to indemnify us against any claims or liabilities that existed prior to the April 1, 1999 and June 1, 1999 share purchase agreements. Also on October 10, 2001, we entered into a settlement agreement with the former majority shareholder of Equity Capital Group. Under the agreement, the former shareholder is to pay us $290,000 to cover the costs of the Sharon Ho settlement and additional related legal expenses. The settlement amount is to be paid in set installments from October 10, 2001 to October 25, 2002. In addition to the indemnification and settlement agreements, Voice Mobility International, Inc. has also o
btained a security agreement, a guaranty agreement and a stock pledge agreement to further protect and collateralize its position. On October 15, 2001, a settlement agreement and mutual release was signed between the Voice Mobility International, Inc. and Ms. Ho. The settlement agreement sets forth payments owing to Ms. Ho by Voice Mobility in the sum of $252,500 to be paid in set installments from October 10, 2001 to October 1, 2002. On March 8, 2002, a shareholder and Director of the Company indemnified the Company against any losses that may be incurred on the collectibility of the settlement amount related to Voice Mobility and the former majority shareholder of Equity Capital Group.
On August 24, 2001, Manschot Opportunity Fund, LP and Galladio Capital Management, BV filed suit in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Orange (Case No. 01CC10988) against Voice Mobility International, Inc., Funkart Holdings, Inc., Pioneer Growth Corporation, Robert L. Cashman and Greg Harrington. The suit relates to an alleged December 1998 agreement between Motorsports Promotions, Inc. and Funkart Holdings, Inc., during the time period prior to Voice Mobility Inc.'s April 1999 reverse acquisition of Equity Capital Group, Inc., the predecessor company to Voice Mobility International. Plaintiffs allege to be creditors of Motorsports Promotions, acquiring Motorsports' rights under the alleged agreement at a UCC public sale. Defendant Funkart Holdings is alleged to have been a subsidiary of Equity Capital Group during the period in question, but which was assigned to Pioneer Growth Corporation, a company unaffiliated with Voice Mobility International, pursuant
to the reverse acquisition. The suit alleges that during the period in question, Voice Mobility International also was the alter-ego of defendant Cashman. The suit alleges breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duty and seeks compensatory damages in excess of $1,325,000, prejudgment interest and punitive damages. Voice Mobility has tendered the defense and indemnity of such claims to Mr. Cashman. We believe that there is no substantive merit to the claims against Voice Mobility International and we intend to defend the lawsuit vigorously if Mr. Cashman fails to perform the defense and indemnification obligations he has accepted.
On December 31, 2001, Budd Stewart, a former employee of Voice Mobility, filed a Writ of Summons and Statement of Claim with the Supreme Court of British Columbia, claiming breach of an implied employment contract and stock option agreement by Voice Mobility Inc. The relief sought by Mr. Stewart is damages under several causes of action for an aggregate of approximately $1,825,892. We believe that there is no substantive merit to the claims and we intend to vigorously defend the action.
We anticipate that, from time to time, we periodically may become subject to other legal proceedings in the ordinary course of our business. We are not a party to any other litigation required to be disclosed under Item 103 of Regulation S-K as at the date of this filing. We are unable to ascertain the ultimate aggregate amount of monetary liability or financial impact of the above matters which seek damages of material or indeterminate amounts, and therefore cannot determine whether these actions, suits, claims or proceedings will, individually or collectively, have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition. We intend to vigorously defend these actions, suits, claims and proceedings.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.
There were no matters submitted to a vote of our security holders either through solicitation of proxies or otherwise in the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.
Our common stock was listed and commenced trading on the OTC Bulletin Board on June 30, 1999 under the symbol "VMII", on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange on April 12, 2000 under the symbol "VMY"and on the Toronto Stock Exchange on July 16, 2001 under the symbol "VMY". Since June 30, 1999, trading in our common stock has been limited and sporadic. The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low sales prices for our common stock as reported on the OTC Bulletin Board:
PERIOD | HIGH (U.S.$) | LOW (U.S.$) | VOLUME |
|
2000 |
First Quarter.............................. | $11.00 | $2.00 | 2,339,600 |
Second Quarter.......................... | $9.13 | $4.69 | 1,762,500 |
Third Quarter......................... | $7.25 | $5.00 | 1,827,500 |
Fourth Quarter........................... | $5.25 | $1.94 | 1,974,900 |
2001 |
First Quarter.............................. | $3.00 | $1.91 | 914,700 |
Second Quarter.......................... | $2.00 | $1.29 | 771,600 |
Third Quarter......................... | $1.52 | $0.32 | 1,075,400 |
Fourth Quarter........................... | $0.53 | $0.20 | 984,100 |
2002 |
January 1 - March 26 | $0.35 | $0.13 | 1,185,300 |
These quotations were taken from the OTC Bulletin Board Historical Research Service. Such over-the-counter market quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark down or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low sales prices for our common stock as reported on the Toronto Stock Exchange:
PERIOD | HIGH (Cdn.$) | LOW (Cdn.$) | VOLUME |
|
2001 |
First Quarter.............................. | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Second Quarter.......................... | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Third Quarter......................... | $2.50 | $0.60 | 168,438 |
Fourth Quarter........................... | $0.75 | $0.35 | 723,940 |
|
2002 |
January 1 - March 26 | $0.50 | $0.25 | 2,649,634 |
The number of shareholders of record as at March 26, 2002 was 154. At March 26, 2002 we had outstanding 34,248,782 common share equivalents, consisting of 28,148,782 shares of Common Stock and 6,100,000 shares of Common Stock issuable on conversion of all outstanding Exchangeable Shares, represented by one Series A Preferred Stock. The closing sale price for our common stock on March 26, 2002, as reported on the OTC Bulletin Board, was $0.23.
We have not paid any cash dividends on our Common Stock and have no present intention of paying any dividends. Our current policy is to retain earnings, if any, for use in operations and in the development of its business. Our future dividend policy will be determined from time to time by the Board of Directors.
RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES
The following sets forth certain information concerning our currently outstanding securities which were sold or issued by us during the last fiscal year without the registration of the securities under the Securities Act of 1933 in reliance on exemptions from such registration requirements.
On April 3, 2001, in a private placement transaction, we issued special warrants to acquire, for no additional consideration, an aggregate of 6,500,000 units, each unit consisting of one share of our common stock and a one-half of a share warrant to acquire a share of common stock at a price of Cdn$ 2.00 per share. In this transaction, an aggregate of 6,500,000 special warrants were issued at a price of Cdn$ 2.00 per special warrant. To the extent that U.S. securities laws were applicable to the issuance, the issuance was made in reliance on Section 4(2) of the Securities Act and Regulation S thereunder. To the extent that U.S. securities laws were applicable to the issuance of the common stock and share warrants upon exercise of the special warrants, the issuance was made in reliance on Section 4(2) of the Securities Act and Regulation S thereunder.
On April 3, 2001, in a private placement transaction, we issued special compensation options exercisable for no additional consideration into compensation options. The compensation options will entitle the agents in the special warrant private placement transaction to purchase 650,000 units at the price of Cdn$2.00 per unit. Each unit consists of one common share and one-half of one share warrant. Each whole share warrant will entitle the holder to purchase one additional common share at the price of Cdn$2.25 per share. The compensation options are non-transferable and expire on April 3, 2003. The agents may exercise the agents' compensation options by way of a "cashless" exercise (they may elect, when exercising, to satisfy their obligation to pay the cash exercise price to the company by accepting a lesser number of common shares). To the extent that U.S. securities laws were applicable to the issuance, the issuance was made in reliance on Section 4(2) of the Securities Act and R
egulation S thereunder.
On April 25, 2001, in connection with the issuance of a promissory note in the principal amount of Cdn$300,000, we issued to one purchaser 100,000 Class K warrants, each entitling the holder to one share of common stock per warrant, exercisable at $1.50 per share at any time up to April 25, 2004. To the extent that U.S. securities laws were applicable to the issuance, the issuance was made in reliance on Section 4(2) of the Securities Act and Regulation S thereunder.
On May 11, 2001, in connection with the issuance of two promissory notes in the aggregate principal amount of Cdn$500,000, we issued to two purchasers an aggregate of 166,667 Class L warrants, each entitling the holder to one share of common stock per warrant, exercisable at $1.50 per share at any time up to May 11, 2004. To the extent that U.S. securities laws were applicable to the issuance, the issuance was made in reliance on Section 4(2) of the Securities Act and Regulation S thereunder.
On June 14, 2001, in connection with the issuance of two promissory notes in the aggregate principal amount of Cdn$600,000, we issued to two purchasers an aggregate of 200,000 Class M warrants, each entitling the holder to one share of common stock per warrant, exercisable at $1.50 per share at any time up to June 14, 2004. On December 28, 2001, the Class M warrant holders terminated all Class M warrants. To the extent that U.S. securities laws were applicable to the issuance, the issuance was made in reliance on Section 4(2) of the Securities Act and Regulation S thereunder.
On June 25, 2001, in connection with the issuance of two promissory notes in the aggregate principal amount of Cdn$500,000, we issued to two purchasers an aggregate of 166,667 Class N warrants, each entitling the holder to one share of common stock per warrant, exercisable at $1.50 per share at any time up to June 25, 2004. On December 28, 2001, the Class N warrant holders terminated all Class N warrants. To the extent that U.S. securities laws were applicable to the issuance, the issuance was made in reliance on Section 4(2) of the Securities Act and Regulation S thereunder.
On March 30, 2001, we retracted 80,969 shares of our Series B Preferred at $3.00 per share for aggregate cash of $242,907. The retraction reduced the number of Series B Preferred shares outstanding from 666,667 to 585,698.
On December 28, 2001, the Class L, M and N warrants, exercisable into an aggregate of 533,334 shares of common stock were cancelled by the holders.
ITEM 6: SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
(in thousands, except per share data)
The following table presents selected financial data for us as at December 31, 2001 and for the five fiscal years ended December 31, 2001. We derived the selected financial data set forth below with respect to our statements of operations for the three fiscal years ended December 31, 2001 and our balance sheets as at December 31, 2001 and 2000, from our consolidated financial statements that are included elsewhere in this Form 10-K. The selected financial data set forth below with respect to our statements of operations for each of the two fiscal years ending December 31, 1998 and the balance sheet data as at December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997, was derived from our consolidated financial statements which are not included in this Form 10-K. The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-K. T
he statement of operations data and the balance sheet data are derived from our consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
| Year Ended December 31, 2001 | Year Ended December 31, 2000 | Year Ended December 31, 1999 | Year Ended December 31, 1998 | Year Ended December 31, 1997 |
| | | | | |
Statement of Operations Data: |
Sales | $358 | $275 | $56 | $119 | $520 |
Expenses: | | | | | |
Cost of sales | 50 | 86 | 52 | 75 | 260 |
Sales and marketing | 2,238 | 3,589 | 1,191 | 190 | 60 |
Research and development | 4,618 | 2,709 | 2,250 | 284 | 66 |
General and administrative and other | 3,745 | 3,542 | 3,412 | 501 | 303 |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Total expenses | 10,651 | 9,926 | 6,905 | 1,050 | 689 |
| | | | | |
Net loss | (10,293) | (9,651) | (6,849) | (931) | (169) |
Deemed dividend on Series B Preferred Stock | -- | (1,451) | -- | -- | -- |
Dividends paid on preferred stock | 57 | | | | |
Reduction of beneficial conversion feature on retraction of 80,969 Series B preferred stock | (110) | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders | $(10,240) | $(11,102) | $(6,849) | $(931) | $(169) |
| | | | | |
Basic and diluted net loss per common share | $(0.34) | $(0.46) | $(0.41) | $(0.14) | $ (0.03) |
| | | | | |
Weighted average number of common stock and common stock equivalents outstanding used in basic and diluted per share calculation | 30,068 | 24,031 | 16,904 | 6,600 | 6,600 |
| December 31, 2001 | December 31, 2000 | December 31, 1999 | December 31, 1998 | December 31, 1997 |
| | | | | |
Balance Sheet Data: | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | $1,732 | $603 | $121 | $37 | $1 |
Working capital | 1,506 | 1,634 | (1,126) | (1,432) | (483) |
Total assets | 4,336 | 4,665 | 852 | 279 | 82 |
Current Liabilities | 1,049 | 1,103 | 1,453 | 1,577 | 274 |
Long term Liabilities | 1,576 | -- | -- | -- | 233 |
Total Liabilities | 2,625 | 1,103 | 1,453 | 1,577 | 507 |
Total stockholders' equity (deficiency) | 1,711 | 3,562 | (602) | (1,298) | (425) |
The foregoing table assumes no exercise of any
stock options or warrants outstanding as of December 31, 2001. As
of December 31, 2001, there were options and warrants outstanding
to purchase a total of 12,019,936 shares of common stock with a
weighted average exercise price of $1.89 per share.
The following selected financial data are derived from the
continuing financial statements of Voice Mobility Inc., a company
incorporated under the laws of the Canada Business Corporation Act
in 1993. Through a series of transactions in June 1999, Voice
Mobility Inc. was recapitalized and acquired the net assets of
Voice Mobility International, Inc. (formerly Equity Capital Group,
Inc.), an inactive United States company registered on the OTC
Bulletin Board. The Consolidated Financial Statements are a
continuation of the financial statements of the accounting
acquirer, Voice Mobility Inc.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
OVERVIEW
You should read the following discussion of
our financial condition and results of operations together with the
financial statements and the notes to financial statements included
elsewhere in this filing prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States. This discussion
contains forward-looking statements that reflect our plans,
estimates and beliefs. Our actual results could differ materially
from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements.
Voice Mobility International, Inc. is a Nevada corporation engaged
in the development and sales and marketing of unified voice
messaging software through its wholly owned operating subsidiaries,
Voice Mobility Inc. and Voice Mobility (US) Inc. Our Enhanced
Messaging software suite allows for legacy voice-mail replacement
and incremental offerings such as real time call connect,
voice-mail to e-mail, and fax to e-mail services. These unified
communication services are facilitated by the creation of a single
personal digital mailbox that can receive any type of communication
regardless of its incoming format or medium. The principal
geographic markets include North America, Latin America, Europe and
Asia.
Results of Operations for the fiscal years ended December 31,
2001 compared to December 31, 2000
Sales Sales for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2001 were $358,191 compared to $275,190 for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2000 representing an increase of 30%. Sales for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2001 were for software license
sales, mailbox subscriptions, computer hardware and support
services of which $189,801 represented sales to NBTel. The increase
to sales is attributed to the increase in the volume of goods sold
compared to the same period last year. Sales for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2000 were for recognition of deferred revenue
from 1999, sale of third party computer hardware and software,
server installation and setup charges, and software license
revenue.
In the third quarter of 2001, we recognized revenue from software
license sales of $350,000 to Digital China. We have been unable to
collect funds from this sale to Digital China and have therefore
reversed the revenue recognized of $350,000. As a result, sales for
the three-month period ended September 30, 2001, previously
reported as $388,621 on our Form 10-Q filed on November 13, 2001,
have now been retroactively adjusted to $38,621 as a result of this
adjustment.
In April 2000 we entered into a three year license agreement with
Ikano Communications, Inc. and received $250,000 for the
installation and set up of our unified communication software. The
$250,000 was deferred and is being recognized ratably over the term
of the agreement. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001, we
have recognized $83,333 of the deferred amount.
Cost of sales Cost of sales were $49,999 and $86,498
for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000 respectively,
representing a 42% decrease. Cost of sales for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2001 is comprised of commissions on software
license sales, telephony hardware, amortization of the telephony
hardware and third party software, installation costs of our
unified communications product at existing customer sites. Cost of
sales for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000 is comprised of
third party software licenses, telephony hardware, data and voice
transmission costs, and installation costs.
In the third quarter of 2001, we recorded costs related to revenue
from software license sales to Digital China. We have been unable
to collect funds from this sale and have therefore reversed the
revenue recognized and related costs of sales of $82,250. As a
result, cost of sales for the three-month period ended September
30, 2001, previously reported as $99,558 on our Form 10-Q filed on
November 13, 2001, have now been retroactively adjusted to $17,308
as a result of this adjustment.
Operating Expenses
Sales & Marketing - Our sales and marketing costs
consist primarily of personnel, advertising, promotions, public
relations, trade shows and business development. Total costs were
$2,237,563 and $3,588,642 for the fiscal years ended December 31,
2001 and 2000 respectively representing a decrease of 38%. These
costs reflect employee stock option compensation cost of $nil and
$1,178,996 for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000
respectively.
The decrease of $172,083 (net of stock based compensation) in sales
and marketing expense between the fiscal years ended December 31,
2001 and 2000, is primarily a result of a decrease in the number of
sales and marketing personnel, consulting fees, and corresponding
decrease in advertising and promotions, general sales and marketing
expenses.
Research and Development - Our research and development
costs consist primarily of personnel, data and voice transmission,
and related facility costs. Research and development costs were
$4,618,284 and $2,709,048 for the fiscal years ended December 31,
2001 and 2000 respectively, representing an increase of 70%. These
costs reflect employee stock option compensation cost of $257,934
and $964,673 for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000
respectively.
The incremental increase of $2,615,975 (net of stock based
compensation) in research and development expense between the
fiscal years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, is a primarily a
result of expenses incurred to develop a carrier-classified unified
communications product and acceleration in the development process
for two new versions of our unified communications product.
Of the $2,615,975, $1,707,989 was incurred under an agreement with
Innovatia Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Aliant Inc., to
develop a carrier-classified unified communications product. The
intent of the development agreement is that the resulting product
will become Aliant’s primary hosted messaging solution for
business and residential customers.
The primary reason for the remaining increase in costs of $907,986
is a result of acceleration in the development process resulting in
two new versions of our unified communications product.
General and Administrative - Our general and administrative
costs consist primarily of personnel costs, professional and legal
costs, consulting fees, travel, and the lease of office space.
Total general and administrative costs were $3,623,980 and
$3,639,028 for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000
respectively, representing a decrease of 0.004%. These costs
reflect employee stock option compensation cost of $45,633 and
$162,089 for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000
respectively. A further $125,250 and $880,500 of stock option
compensation costs were recorded for the fiscal years ended
December 31, 2001 and 2000 respectively for stock option grants
awarded to non-employees in exchange for consulting services.
The incremental increase of $856,658 (net of stock based
compensation) in general and administrative costs between the
fiscal years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, is a primarily a
result of an increase in legal fees accounting for $409,208 of the
increase of $856,658. Legal fees during the period incurred related
to regulatory and registration filings. Consulting fees during the
period increased $194,323. The primary reason for the remaining
increase in costs of $253,127 is a result of depreciation and
amortization, insurance, office and telecommunication that is due
to the increase in headcount in 2001 compared to the same period
last year. We anticipate that general and administrative costs will
continue to grow in the foreseeable future as we implement our
market growth strategies.
Interest Expense Our interest expense was $281,017
and $16,411 for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000
respectively. The increase in interest expense resulted from the
increase in financing activities in 2001.
Interest Income Interest income was $160,095 and
$113,490 for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000
respectively. In 2001, we earned interest income on cash though
term deposits.
Income Taxes At December 31, 2001 we have $3,683,000
US tax net operating losses that expire in the years 2019 through
to 2021. As at December 31, 2001 we have Canadian tax net operating
losses of approximately $13,629,000 that will expire in the years
2002 through to 2008. Non-capital losses of our Canadian operating
subsidiary, Voice Mobility Inc., are restricted by Canadian Income
Tax Law and may not be available entirely for use in future years
pursuant to Section 111(4) of the Canadian Income Tax Act.
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary
differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities
for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income
tax purposes. For fiscal years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000
respectively, we recognized a valuation allowance equal to deferred
tax assets for which realization is uncertain.
Results of Operations for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2000
compared to December 31, 1999
Sales Sales for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2000 were $275,190 compared to $55,997 for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 1999 representing an increase of 391%. Sales for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2000 represent the recognition of
$93,016 in deferred revenue from 1999, $98,162 for the sale of
third party computer hardware and software, $21,512 for server
installation and setup charges, and $62,500 of software license
revenue based on our software license agreement with Ikano
Communications Inc. Sales for the fiscal year ended December 31,
1999 were from the sale of a software license and third party
hardware and software.
We entered into a three year license agreement with Ikano
Communications, Inc. and received $250,000 for the installation,
set up and maintenance of our Unified Communication software.
Revenue from this arrangement is recognized ratably over the term
of the agreement. $62,500 of the payment was recognized in the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2000
Cost of sales - Cost of sales is comprised of third party
software licenses, telephony hardware, data and voice transmission
costs, and installation costs. Cost of sales were $86,498 and
$51,843 for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999
respectively representing a 67% increase.
Operating Expenses
Sales & Marketing - Our sales and marketing costs
consist primarily of personnel, advertising, promotions, public
relations, trade shows and business development. Total costs were
$3,588,642 and $1,190,754 for the fiscal years ended December 31,
2000 and 1999 respectively representing an increase of 201%. These
costs reflect employee stock option compensation cost of $1,178,996
and $597,891 for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999
respectively.
The incremental increase of $1,816,783 (net of stock based
compensation) in sales and marketing expense between the fiscal
years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999, is a result of an increase
in sales and marketing personnel, advertising and promotions,
travel and participation in industry trade shows, consulting fees,
and general sales and marketing expenses. These costs have been
primarily incurred as result of market development efforts.
Research and Development - Our research and development
costs consist primarily of personnel, data and voice transmission,
and related facility costs. Research and development costs were
$2,709,048 and $2,250,153 for the fiscal years ended December 31,
2000 and 1999 respectively representing an increase of 20%. These
costs reflect employee stock option compensation cost of $964,673
and $1,023,429 for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2000 and
1999 respectively.
The incremental increase of $517,651 (net of stock based
compensation) in research and development expense between the
fiscal years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999, is a result of an
increase in research and development personnel costs, leased office
space and utility costs, data and voice transmission costs, and
general research and development costs.
General and Administrative - Our general and administrative
costs consist primarily of personnel costs, professional and legal
costs, consulting fees, travel, and the lease of office space.
Total general and administrative costs were $3,639,028 and
$2,351,643 for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999
respectively, representing an increase of 55%. These costs reflect
employee stock option compensation cost of $162,089 and $1,289,260
for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999 respectively.
A further $880,500 of stock option compensation cost was recorded
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000 for stock option grants
awarded to non-employees in exchange for consulting services.
The incremental increase of $1,534,056 (net of stock based
compensation) in general and administrative costs between the
fiscal years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999, is a result of an
increase in personnel costs, professional and legal costs,
consulting fees, depreciation and amortization, lease of office
space, and other general administrative costs. We anticipate that
general and administrative costs will continue to grow in the
foreseeable future as we implement our market growth
strategies.
Interest Expense Our interest expense was $16,411 and
$70,209 for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999
respectively. The decrease in interest expense resulted from the
decrease in notes payable in 2000.
Interest Income Interest income was $113,490 and nil
for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999 respectively.
In 2000, we earned interest income on cash though term
deposits.
Income Taxes At December 31, 2000 we have $136,000 US
tax net operating losses that expire in 2020. As at December 31,
2000 we have Canadian tax net operating losses of approximately
$9,328,000 that will expire in the years 2001 through to 2007.
Non-capital losses of our Canadian operating subsidiary, Voice
Mobility Inc., are restricted by Canadian Income Tax Law and may
not be available entirely for use in future years pursuant to
Section 111(4) of the Canadian Income Tax Act.
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary
differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities
for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income
tax purposes. For fiscal years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999
respectively, we recognized a valuation allowance equal to deferred
tax assets for which realization is uncertain.
Results of Operations for the fiscal years ended December 31,
1999 compared to December 31, 1998
Sales - Sales for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 1999 were $55,997 compared to $119,248 for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 1998 representing an decrease of 53%. Sales
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999 were from the sales of
a software license and third party hardware and software. Sales for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998 were from the sale of third
party hardware and software, server installation and setup charges.
All sales over both periods were sales of equipment and software
that was in the beta stage of development.
Cost of Sales - Cost of sales is
comprised of third party software licenses, telephony hardware,
data and voice transmission costs, and installation costs. Cost of
sales were $51,843 and $75,439 for the fiscal years ended December
31, 1999 and December 31, 1998, respectively, representing a 31%
decrease.
Operating Expenses
Sales and Marketing - Our sales and
marketing costs consist primarily of personnel costs, stock
compensation, advertising, promotions, public relations, trade
shows and business development. Total costs were $1,190,754 and
$189,691 for the fiscal years ended December 31, 1999 and December
31, 1998, respectively, representing an increase of 528%. The
increase of $1,001,063 reflects employee stock option compensation
cost of $597,891.
The incremental increase of $403,172 in sales
and marketing expense between the two years is a result of an
increase of $167,325 in sales and marketing personnel costs,
$64,366 in promotions, $117,514 for travel and participation in
industry trade shows, and $53,967 in general sales and marketing
costs. These sales and marketing expenditures have been incurred as
result of market development efforts.
Research and Development - Our research
and development costs consist primarily of personnel costs, stock
compensation, data and voice transmission, and related facility
costs. Research and development costs were $2,250,153 and $283,918,
for the fiscal years ended December 31, 1999 and December 31, 1998,
respectively, representing an increase of 693%. The increase of
$1,966,235 in research and development costs from 1998 to 1999
primarily reflects an employee stock option compensation cost of
$1,023,429.
The incremental increase of $942,806 in
research and development costs between the two years is the result
of an increase of $344,928 in personnel costs, $34,988 in leased
office space and utility costs, $29,512 in data and voice
transmission costs and $33,378 in general research and development
costs. $500,000 in research and development costs was recognized in
accordance with an arrangement with Aliant Inc. dated March 26,
1999. As a result of the acquisition of VMI, we were obligated to
issue 1,428,571 shares of our common stock valued at $500,000.
General and Administrative - Our
general and administrative costs consist primarily of personnel
costs, stock compensation, professional and legal costs, consulting
fees, travel, and the lease of office space. General and
administrative costs were $2,351,643 and $460,911 for the fiscal
years ended December 31, 1999 and December 31, 1998, respectively,
representing an increase of 410%. The increase of $1,890,732
primarily reflects an employee stock option compensation cost of
$1,289,260.
The incremental increase of $601,472 in
general and administrative costs between the two years is the
result of an increase of $110,560 in personnel costs, $247,873 in
professional and legal costs, $52,208 in consulting fees, $11,167
in lease of office space, $60,000 in accruals for interest, and
$119,664 in general administrative costs.
Acquisition fee for recapitalization
The acquisition fee of $200,000 was for payments related to
legal fees in the reverse acquisition of VMII. These fees have been
expensed as a fee for the recapitalization in the year ended
December 31, 1999.
Interest Expense - Our interest expense
is primarily related to short-term debt. Interest expense was
$70,209 and $39,887 for the fiscal years ended December 31, 1999
and December 31, 1998, respectively. The increase of $30,322
between the two years resulted from an increase in notes payable
and shareholder advances.
Income Taxes - Deferred income taxes
reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the
carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting
purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. For fiscal
years ended December 31, 1999 and 1998 respectively, the Company
has recognized a valuation allowance equal to deferred tax assets
for which realization is uncertain.
Extraordinary Loss - In March 1999 VMI
and Acrex agreed to a loan settlement transaction with Ibex
Investments Ltd. ("Ibex"). Pursuant to these understandings VMII
issued warrants to purchase 500,000 shares of Common Stock to Ibex
in settlement of a loan made by Ibex to VMI in the principal amount
of $167,000. The original loan agreement did not provide for the
settlement of debt with equity instruments. Consequently an
extraordinary loss of $790,000 has been recorded based on the
difference between the fair value of the equity instruments issued
and the carrying value of the retired debt. The fair value of the
warrants was estimated using the Black Scholes option pricing
model.
Fluctuations in Annual and Quarterly Results
Our annual and quarterly operating results may
fluctuate significantly in the future as a result of numerous
factors, including:
- The amount and timing of expenditures
required developing strategic relationships to enhance sales and
marketing.
- Changes in the growth rate of Internet usage
and acceptance by consumers of unified messaging systems.
- Emergence of new services and technologies
in the market in which we compete; and fluctuations of foreign
currency exchange rates.
- Unanticipated delays in product development
that could adversely affect our revenues or results of
operations.
- The failure or unavailability of third-party
technologies and services could limit our ability to generate
revenue.
In addition, a portion of our revenue relies on the number
of mailboxes our customers sell and therefore our revenue may
fluctuate depending on the marketing and sales campaigns of our
customers.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of December 31, 2001, we had $1,732,200 in cash and cash
equivalents and a working capital balance of $1,505,963.
During the first quarter of 2001, we received $1.8 million in
proceeds from the release of preferred stock from escrow and during
the year we received $0.4 million from the sale of our common stock
to employees through our employee stock option plan.
In April 2001, we sold 6.5 million Special
Warrants in a public offering, generating $8.4 million in cash,
before offering expenses. Prior to our public offering, we funded
our operations primarily through equity private placements and debt
financing.
Our operating activities resulted in net cash outflows of $7.6
million in 2001, $5.5 million in 2000, and $2.1 million in 1999.
The operating cash outflows for these periods resulted from
significant investments in research and development, sales,
marketing and services, which led to operating losses in all
periods.
Investing activities resulted in net cash outflows of $0.9 million
in 2001, $1.9 million in 2000, and $0.5 million in 1999. The
investing activities consisted primarily of purchases of property
and equipment as a result of growth of our company and our
development activities. These capital expenditures consisted of
hardware, software, equipment, and furniture for our growing
employee headcount, and our research and development needs
including test equipment. At December 31, 2001, we did not have any
material commitments for future capital expenditures.
In February 2001, we entered into a three year development
agreement with Innovatia Inc., a shareholder and a wholly owned
subsidiary of Aliant Inc. The agreement is to develop a
carrier-classified unified communications product that will become
Aliant’s primary hosted messaging solution for business and
residential customers. In consideration of the services provided,
we had originally agreed to pay quarterly fees based directly on
the value of the work performed beginning February 2001. We had the
option to elect to pay for some or all of the services in cash or
common shares. On December 28, 2001, we agreed to settle the value
of the services provided to date by Innovatia of $1.7 million in
the form of a promissory note bearing interest at prime plus 1%.
The promissory note is repayable in quarterly payments over the
term commencing July 2002 and for the ten consecutive quarters
thereafter. We have the option to elect to settle some or all of
the amounts owing in cash or common shares. On December 28, 2001,
we also issued 500,000 common shares to Innovatia at a market price
of $0.26 per share as partial payment of the promissory note.
On December 28, 2001, the Class F, G, I, L, M
and N warrants, exercisable into an aggregate of 3,533,334 shares
of common stock were cancelled by the holders.
On March 4, 2002, we renegotiated the remaining term of the
February 2001 agreement. The term of the revised agreement is for
the period January 1, 2002 to December 31, 2003. Innovatia will
continue to provide the originally agreed services, however, in
consideration of the services provided, we have agreed to pay
Innovatia a cash royalty within 30 days after the end of each
calendar quarter equal to 10% on the gross revenue received for the
sale of our products globally within the quarter.
On March 6, 2002, in connection with the exercise of 500,000 VM
Canada Exchangeable Shares, we issued 500,000 common shares. There
was no cash or other consideration involved in this transaction as
it was an exchange only.
We currently anticipate that revenues will
increase in the long-term as we increase our sales and marketing
activities and introduce new versions of our software that are
technologically feasible and of carrier class quality. We have
implemented significant cost reductions and expect to keep our
operating costs to a minimum until cash is available through
financing or operating activities. However, based on current
projections, if we are unable to increase revenues over historical
levels, we will have negative cash flows in excess of $3 million
for the balance of fiscal 2002 and we will need to raise additional
funds through equity or debt financing to meet our current and
future financial commitments. To date, we have incurred significant
operating losses that raises substantial doubt about our ability to
raise funds and to continue as a going concern. Based on current
projections, we anticipate significant revenues from Tier I
telecommunications providers in 2002 from revenues generated
through the replacement of legacy voice mail systems. Such revenues
will afford us the ability to fund a portion of our daily
operations and service our debt obligations, however, it is
reasonably likely that we will need to raise additional funds
through equity or debt financing to meet our current and future
financial commitments. We believe we have the ability to raise such
additional funds. However, there are no assurances that we will be
successful in achieving these objectives. In addition, as a result
of the current slowdown in capital spending by telecommunications
service providers, revenues from service providers may be adversely
affected more than we currently project. See "Risk Factors".
Inflation has not had a significant effect to date on our results
of operations.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE
DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
We are exposed to market risk from changes in
foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates which could
impact our results of operations and financial condition. We manage
our exposure to these market risks through our regular operating
and financing activities.
We face foreign currency exchange risk because the majority of our
revenues are denominated in U.S. dollars and a majority of our
operating costs are incurred in Canadian dollars. The fluctuations
in the foreign exchange rate between the U.S. and Canadian currency
will result in fluctuations in our annual and quarterly results.
Management has not employed the use of foreign currency derivative
financial instruments that would allow the reduction in our
exposure to exchange rate movements. Management does not expect any
significant change in the strategies it employs to manage exposure
in the near future.
We maintain a short-term investment portfolio consisting of term
deposits with an average maturity of less than 90 days. These
short-term investments are subject to interest rate risk and we
manage this risk by maintaining sufficient cash balance such that
we are typically able to hold our investments to maturity.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY
DATA.
The Financial Statements and related
information required to be filed hereunder beginning on page 47 of
this Form 10-K.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING
AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.
Information related to our changes in
accountants is incorporated by reference from our filing made on
Form 8-K as filed with the Commission on March 16, 2000.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT.
The following table sets forth the names,
positions and ages of our executive officers and directors. All our
directors serve until the next annual meeting of shareholders or
until their successors are elected and qualify. The board of
directors elects officers and their terms of office are, except to
the extent governed by employment contract, at the discretion of
the board of directors.
Name | Age | Position |
|
Randy G. Buchamer | 45 | Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer |
|
James J. Hutton | 36 | President and a Director |
|
James Hewett | 49 | Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary |
|
David Grinstead | 44 | Exec. Vice President, Business Development |
|
William Gardiner | 46 | Vice President, Business Development |
|
William E. Krebs | 55 | Director |
|
David Scott | 67 | Director |
|
Morgan Sturdy | 49 | Director |
|
Robert E. Neal | 47 | Director |
|
Donald A. Calder | 57 | Director |
Randy G. Buchamer was appointed Chief
Executive Officer in August 2001, was appointed Chairman of the
Board of Directors in September 2000 and has served as a Director
since August 1999. . From February 1998 to March 1999, Mr. Buchamer
served as the Managing Director of Operations for the Jim Pattison
Group and was responsible for supporting the $4.4 billion
operations of 55 companies owned by the Jim Pattison Group. From
1996 to 1998, he served as Vice President and Chief Operating
Officer of Mohawk Oil Retail SBU and from 1989 to 1996 as Vice
President Corporate Services and Chief Information Officer for
Mohawk Oil Company. From 1987 to 1988, he was Retail Market
Specialist for Digital Equipment of Canada Limited. Mr. Buchamer
founded and served, from 1981 to 1988, as President of Vartech
Systems Corporation and RB Computer Products, an IBM value added
reseller and North American software publisher and distributor of
retail, distribution and manufacturing software solutions. From
1979 to 1981, he was Sales Manager and, from 1978 to 1979, a Sales
Representative for Micom Canada Ltd. He received his Executive MBA
from Simon Fraser University's Executive Management Development
Program in 1994 and attended the Business Administration program at
the University of Illlinois. He also has completed courses at the
IBM Canada Business Management School. He is a member of the
Vancouver Board of Trade and the Sales and Marketing Executives
Association of Vancouver.
James J. Hutton was appointed President in August 2001. Prior to
this appointment, he served as our Chief Executive Officer from
April 1998 to August 2001. Mr. Hutton was appointed to the Board of
Directors in June of 1999 and has served as a Director of our
subsidiary, VMI since 1998. From January 1998 to the present, Mr.
Hutton has also served as a director of Acrex Ventures Ltd. From
1990 to the present, he has also served as Director and President
of South Sycamore Group Holdings, a family company involved in
diversified investments. Mr. Hutton served as Canadian Regional
Manager for Ascend Communications (1995-1998). He served in various
capacities for Gandalf Systems, Inc., from 1989 to 1995, starting
as a sales executive and becoming Western Regional Manager. From
1987 to 1989, Mr. Hutton was a Sales Trainee in the Automotive
Electronics Group of Amp of Canada. Mr. Hutton attended the
University of British Columbia.
James Hewett was appointed Chief Financial
Officer in May 2000. From 1999 to 2000, Mr. Hewett was Vice
President, Finance and Administration for Steels Industrial
Products Ltd. From 1997 to 1999, he served as Chief Financial
Officer with Nice Systems Canada Ltd., a computer telephony
interface provider of call logging and quality performance products
for call centers. In 1997, Nice Systems acquired Dees
Communications Ltd., a developer of telephony hardware products and
software products used for quality improvements in call centers.
From 1993 to 1997, Mr. Hewett served as Chief Financial Officer
with Dees Communications Ltd. Mr. Hewett received his Bachelor of
Science from the University of British Columbia and is a member of
the British Columbia Institute of Chartered Accountants.
David Grinstead was appointed Executive Vice
President, Business Development in March 2000. Mr. Grinstead was a
director from May 1999 to March 2000. Before joining Voice
Mobility, Mr. Grinstead was the Director, New Business
Opportunities-Telecommunications at Aliant Inc., a
telecommunications and data services organization based in Eastern
Canada, with assets of $3 billion and annual revenues of $1.7
billion and the parent company of Maritime Tel & Tel. He is
responsible for the development of new business opportunities,
services, and products with a particular focus on the creation of
exportable business, intellectual property and e-commerce
opportunities as well as the development and implementation of new
business development and e-commerce strategies. From 1997 through
January 1999, Mr. Grinstead was Vice-President, Market &
Technology Development with The Bermuda Telephone Company Limited,
Hamilton, Bermuda. In this capacity, Mr. Grinstead was responsible
for all revenue generation, business development, strategic
planning and corporate communications activities. Mr. Grinstead
also held full operating responsibility for BTC Mobility, the
cellular subsidiary, and was Chairman of the Board of Logic
Communications Inc., Bermuda's largest Internet service provider
and systems integrator. Immediately, prior to joining The Bermuda
Telephone Company, Mr. Grinstead was Vice-President, Customer
Solutions and Service of Northwestel Inc., a subsidiary of Bell
Canada Enterprises and President of Northwestel Cable TV Inc, and
Executive Vice-President of Ardicom Digital Communications Inc. He
previously was Chief Operating Officer of MultiServices Canada Inc,
and held senior management roles with Picker International and DHL
Worldwide Express.
William Gardiner has been Vice President Business
Development since May 1998. William Gardiner served as President
from November 1997 to April 1998, and served as a consultant from
1995 to 1997. At Voice Mobility, he engineered the basic concept of
the "follow me" number which is an integral feature of our Unified
Communication software suite and was responsible for introducing
the first e-mail to voice service in Canada, as well as call
connect, same line fax, fax to voice, and e-mail to voice. Mr.
Gardiner earned a Diploma in Computer Technology from Computer Data
Institute in 1989.
William E. Krebs was appointed to the Board in June of 1999 and has
served as the Chairman of the board from 1995 to September 2000.
From 1995 to September 2000, Mr. Krebs was our Treasurer and
Secretary. From January 1995 to the present, Mr. Krebs has also
served as a director of Acrex Ventures Ltd. He also has served as
President and a director of Pacific Western Mortgage Corp. since
1987 and served as President and a Director of Pacific Western
Capital Corp. from 1994 to 1995. From 1997 to 1999, he was a
director of WaveRider Communications, Inc. (NASDAQ: WAVC) and was
its Secretary from 1997 through May 1999. Mr. Krebs served as
Director and President of TelcoPlus Enterprises Ltd. and its wholly
owned subsidiary, Intertec Telecommunications Inc., from 1990 to
1995. Mr. Krebs is a Chartered Accountant and practiced as such
from 1970 to 1980. He served as a Director and President of
CT&T Telecommunications Inc. from 1990 to 1995. Mr. Krebs has
been a member of the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants
since 1973.
David Scott was appointed to the Board in
April 2000. He is a veteran investment executive with more than 30
years experience in the venture capital and mutual fund industries.
Prior to starting his own advisory business, Mr. Scott was
President from 1994 to 1999 of MDS Venture Pacific Inc., a
Vancouver-based venture capital manager. From 1988 to 1994 he was
President, Discovery Enterprises Inc., a venture capital manager
with $30 million in assets under management. He held various
investment industry positions, including President, Toronto Shared
Ventures Inc., a partnership between North American Life and the
Molson Company, President of money manager, Elliott & Page
Ltd., President, ScotiaFund Financial Services Inc., an RSP company
he founded and subsequently sold to a major bank, and various other
mutual fund and senior investment community positions. Mr. Scott
currently devotes substantially all of his time to directorships
and advisory roles with public, private and not for profit
companies.
Morgan Sturdy was appointed to the Board April
2000. Most recently, he was Executive Vice-President and Chief
Operating Officer of NICE Systems North America, which is a leading
global provider of integrated digital recording and quality
management solutions, a publicly traded on the NASDAQ. For twelve
years prior, he served as President of Dees Communications
Engineering Ltd., an innovator in computer telephony solutions,
which was then sold to NICE Systems. From 1997 to 1999, he was
Chairman of the Board of Directors of Hothaus Technologies, a
leader in DSP solutions for Voice over IP, which was subsequently
acquired by Broadcom for Cdn$414 million in 1999. He is a current
director of several publicly traded companies, including Q/Media
Services Corporation, Intrinsyc Software, Infowave Software, Inc.,
TIR Systems, and is a nominee to be a director of Digital Dispatch
Systems. Additionally, he sits on the board of privately held
WaveMakers Research Inc. Mr. Sturdy is a past director of National
Wireless Canadian Research Foundation, past director of the
Technology Industry Association of British Columbia, Chairman of
Acetech, and the current Chairman of Softworld 2001.
Robert E. Neal was appointed to the Board in
September 2000. He is President of Innovatia, a company within
Aliant Inc.’s emerging business division that focuses on the
developing and selling of Internet-based technology. He has been
President of Innovatia since 1997. Mr. Neal is a member of the
Board as the nominee of Aliant, pursuant to an understanding with
Aliant. Aliant is one of VMII’s early investors and currently
its largest customer in Canada. A native of Saint John, New
Brunswick, Mr. Neal began his career in the communications industry
in 1979 at NBTel. In 1992 he became General Manager of NBTel
Mobility and helped bring about a six-fold increase in the customer
base. He was made president of Datacor (Atlantic) Inc. in 1996 and
became president of NBTel interActive and General Manager of Export
at NBTel in the next year. In 1998, he was appointed Vice President
of New Business Development. He currently also serves as a Director
of iMagicTV and Chairman of Prexar, Aliant’s US Internet
company, headquartered in the state of Maine.
Donald A. Calder was appointed to the Board in
February 2002. Mr. Calder is the Vice Chair of the Board and
Executive Committee of the Vancouver 2010 Bid Corporation, which
has the objective to win the right to host the Olympic Winter Games
and Paralympic Games in 2010. Mr. Calder was CEO of BC Telecom from
1997 to 1999 and was previously the Executive Vice President of
Network and Operations at BC Telecom and Group Vice President of
Marketing and Development with Stentor Resource Centre Inc. While
at BC Telecom, Mr. Calder was responsible for negotiating and
structuring the merger between BC Telecom and TELUS, which spawned
the TELUS that exists today. Among his other community commitments,
he is chair of the Vancouver General Hospital and University of
British Columbia Hospital Foundation. Mr. Calder sits on the board
of directors of the United Way of the Lower Mainland and was
Chairman of the 1999 annual fundraising campaign prior to becoming
CEO of the Bid Committee.
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 requires our officers and directors, and persons who own
more than ten percent of a registered class of our equity
securities, to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership
with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Officers, directors
and greater than ten-percent shareholders are required by SEC
regulation to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms
they file.
Based solely on our review of the copies of such forms received by
our company, or written representations from certain reporting
persons that no Form 5 were required for those persons, we believe
that, during the year of 2001 all filing requirements applicable to
its officers, directors, and greater than ten-percent beneficial
owners were complied with.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.
The following table shows, for the three-year
period ended December 31, 2001, the cash and other compensation we
paid to our Chief Executive Officer and to each of our executive
officers who had annual compensation in excess of $100,000.
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
Annual Compensation (1) |
Awards |
Payouts |
Name and Principal Position |
Year |
Salary ($) |
Bonus ($) |
Other |
Restricted Stock Awards ($) |
Securities
Under Options/
SARs
Granted (#) |
LTIP
Payouts ($) |
Randy Buchamer
CEO (from Aug. 2001) |
2001
2000
1999 |
49,872
N/A
N/A |
N/A
N/A
N/A |
N/A
N/A
N/A |
N/A
N/A
N/A |
400,000
N/A
50,000 |
N/A
N/A
N/A |
James J. Hutton
President (former CEO from May 1998 Aug. 2001) |
2001
2000
1999 |
105,555
98,528
72,600 |
51,648
N/A
N/A |
N/A
N/A
N/A |
N/A
N/A
N/A |
0
0
250,000 |
N/A
N/A
N/A |
Thomas G. O’Flaherty
(former President from Jan. 2000 to June 2001) |
2001
2000
1999 |
105,797
104,238
N/A |
32,280
30,000
N/A |
N/A
N/A
N/A |
N/A
N/A
N/A |
125,000
625,000
N/A |
N/A
N/A
N/A |
William Gardiner
Vice President (CEO from Nov. 1997 to Apr. 1998) |
2001
2000
1999 |
57,401
61,709
36,720 |
N/A
N/A
N/A |
N/A
N/A
N/A |
N/A
N/A
N/A |
0
0
200,000 |
N/A
N/A
N/A |
David Grinstead
EVP Business Development
|
2001
2000
1999 |
92,585
92,320
61,256 |
27,438
0
0 |
N/A
N/A
N/A |
N/A
N/A
N/A |
26,600
500,000
50,000 |
N/A
N/A
N/A |
(1) Compensation was paid to Mr. Buchamer, Mr. Hutton, Mr.
O’Flaherty, Mr. Gardiner and Mr. Grinstead by VMI, our
operating subsidiary.
OPTION GRANTS IN THE LAST FISCAL YEAR
 The following table presented in accordance
with the Exchange Act and the Regulations thereunder sets forth
individual grants of stock options under the Voice Mobility
International, Inc. Second Amended and Restated 1999 Stock Option
Plan during the most recently completed financial year to each of
the Named Executive Officers:
Options/SAR Grants in Last Fiscal Year
(Individual Grants) |
Name |
Securities under Options/SAR Granted
(1)(2) |
% of Total Options/SARs Granted to
Employees in Fiscal Year |
Exercise or Base Price
($/Sh) (2) |
Expiration Date |
Potential Realizable Value at Assumed
Annual Rates of Stock Price Appreciation for Option Term (3)
5% 10%
|
Randy Buchamer |
350,000
50,000 |
15.9
2.3 |
Cdn.$1.37
Cdn.$2.06 |
Aug. 14, 2006
June 13, 2006 |
Cdn.$301,555
Cdn.$ 64,776 |
Cdn.$764,200
Cdn.$164,155 |
James J. Hutton |
0 |
0 |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Thomas G. O’Flaherty |
125,000 |
5.6 |
$2.50 |
Dec. 31, 2005 *cancelled on June 29,
2001. |
N/A |
N/A |
William Gardiner |
0 |
0 |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
David Grinstead |
26,600 |
1.2 |
Cdn.$2.63 |
April 22, 2006 |
Cdn.$43,996 |
Cdn.$111,495 |
(1) All of the above options are subject to the
terms of our Second Amended and Restated 1999 Stock Option Plan and
are exercisable only as they vest. The options have a term of 5
years from the date of grant.
(2) All options were granted at an exercise price
equal to the fair market value of our common stock on the date of
grant.
(3) Potential realizable values are net of exercise price, but before
deduction of taxes associated with exercise. These amounts
represent certain assumed rates of appreciation only, based on the
Securities and Exchange Commission rules, and do not represent our
estimate of future stock prices. No gain to an optionee is possible
without an increase in stock price, which will benefit all
stockholders commensurately. A zero percent gain in stock price
will result in zero dollars for the optionee. Actual realizable
values, if any, on stock option exercises are dependent on the
future performance of our common stock, overall market conditions
and the option holders’ continued employment through the
vesting period.
|
AGGREGATED OPTION/EXERCISES IN LAST FISCAL YEAR AND 2001 FISCAL
YEAR END OPTION/VALUES
The following table sets forth information
with respect to the exercise of options to purchase shares of our
common stock during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001 to each
person named in the Summary Compensation Table and the unexercised
options held as of the end of 2001 fiscal year.
Aggregated Options/SAR Exercises in Last Fiscal Year and FY-End Option/SAR Values |
| | | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options/SARs | Value of Unexercised in-the-money Options/SARs at FY-end ($) |
Name | Securities Acquired on Exercise | Aggregate Value Realized | Exercisable/Unexercisable | Exercisable/Unexercisable |
Randy Buchamer | 0 | $0 | 75,000/375,000 | $0 |
James J. Hutton | 0 | $0 | 250,000/0 | $0 |
Thomas G. O'Flaherty | 0 | $0 | 458,333/166,667 | $0 |
William Gardiner | 0 | $0 | 160,000/0 | $0 |
David Grinstead | 0 | $0 | 355,555/221,045 | $0 |
COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS
We currently compensate our directors with a
cash compensation of Cdn$1,000 for participation in each formal
meeting held by the Board of Directors. Our non-employee directors
are also granted 50,000 incentive stock options annually. Employee
Directors are granted incentive stock options based on their
individual employment agreements. All stock option grants are made
pursuant to our Second Amended and Restated 1999 Stock Option
Plan.
EMPLOYMENT CONTRACTS, TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT AND
CHANGE-IN-CONTROL ARRANGEMENTS
In August 2001, Voice Mobility entered into an
employment agreement with Randy Buchamer, who serves as Chief
Executive Officer of VMI. The agreement provides for an annual
salary of Cdn$200,000. Mr. Buchamer’s agreement provides for
the grant of options under our Second Amended and Restated 1999
Stock Option Plan of 350,000 shares of VMII common stock for
Cdn.$1.37 per share, which options vest in equal thirds over the
next three years.
In February 2000, Voice Mobility entered into
an employment agreement with David Grinstead, who serves as
Executive Vice President of Business Development of VMI. The
agreement provides for an annual salary of Cdn$130,000 and
incentive compensation payments based on performance. Mr.
Grinstead’s agreement provided for the grant of options under
our 1999 Stock Option Plan of 500,000 shares of VMII common stock
for $2.125 per share, which options vest in equal thirds over three
years.
In April 2000, Voice Mobility entered into an employment agreement
with James Hutton, who serves as President of VMI. The agreement
provides for an annual salary of Cdn$150,000.
On June 29, 2001, Tom O’Flaherty resigned his position as
President and Director of VMI. As part of his final settlement, Mr.
O’Flaherty will remain in salary continuance up to December
31, 2002. In the case of re-employment with another company, we are
required to pay the difference, if any, between his new monthly
base salary and the monthly base salary which he was earning at
VMI. Under the settlement, Mr. O’Flaherty agreed to forego
any rights he may have under his employment agreement to any
additional monetary bonuses and associated options for 2001 and
2002. As at December 31, 2001, we accrued $103,591 in salary
payable to Mr. O'Flaherty through December 31, 2002.
REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE OF THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The Compensation
Committee (the Committee) of the Board of Directors
determines compensation for the chief executive officer, reviews
and makes recommendations regarding compensation of executive
officers, and supervises the administration of the Company’s
equity plans for executives and all employees. The Committee is
composed of three outside directors, Messrs. Neal, Scott and
Sturdy. No member is an employee or former employee of the
Company.
Executive Compensation Objectives
On behalf of the Board of Directors, the Committee reviews and
makes recommendations concerning:
- The compensation policy
with respect to employees of the Corporation or any of its
subsidiaries insuring that the Corporation is in compliance with
all legal compensation reporting requirements;
- The compensation of the President and the Chief Executive Officer and other officers of the
Corporation;
- Management compensation programs including, stock option plans, incentive
plans, and perquisites;
- The annual, or more often if appropriate review of:
a. Management succession plans and process;
b. Performance appraisal and management and employee development programs;
c. Contingency plans in the event of the unexpected disability of key management;
d. Proposed personnel changes involving officers reporting to the Chief Executive
Officer;
Components of Compensation
Executive compensation at Voice Mobility consists
primarily of base salary and stock options.
Base Salary . Voice Mobility
targets executives’ base salaries according to the
Watson/Wyatt 2000/2001 Salary Survey. In determining each executive
officer’s base salary, the Committee takes into account
competitive market data for similar positions at high-technology
companies, individual responsibilities and performance, and
internal equity within Voice Mobility.
Stock Options . The Company’s equity incentives have
been in the form of stock options. Stock options are issued at an
exercise price of fair market value on the date of grant. Options
granted in fiscal 2001 vest ratably over three years.
Fair-market-value stock options become valuable and exercisable
only if the executive officer continues to work at Voice Mobility
and the stock price subsequently increases.
CEO Compensation
The Chief
Executive Officer’s salary and stock option grants follow the
policies set forth above. Randy Buchamer succeeded James Hutton as
Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Voice Mobility on August 15, 2001.
In deciding on Mr. Buchamer’s compensation package, the
Committee considered compensation practices at companies similar in
size and complexity to Voice Mobility; Mr. Buchamer’s base
salary is set at Cdn$200,000 per year. Upon becoming CEO, Mr.
Buchamer received a stock option stock grant of 350,000 shares, to
recognize his new responsibilities and deliver a significant
portion of his compensation in a manner that is aligned with
shareholder interests.
THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Robert Neal
David Scott
Morgan Sturdy
STOCK PRICE PERFORMANCE GRAPH
The graph below shows the two and a
half-year cumulative total stockholder return assuming the
investment of $100 (and the reinvestment of any dividends
thereafter) on June1999, the first trading day of Voice Mobility
International, Inc.’s common stock, in each of Voice Mobility
International, Inc’s common stock, the NASDAQ Telecomm Index,
and a peer group.(1) Voice Mobility’s stock price performance
shown in the following graph is not indicative of future stock
price performance.
Comparison of 2.5 Years (6/30/99 to 12/31/01)
Cumulative Total Return
Among Voice Mobility, The NASDAQ Telecomm Index, and The Peer Group
Composite |
|
(1) |
The peer group
is composed of companies that are members of the NASDAQ Telecomm
Index and are companies developing unified communications software
which is in a sector related to Voice Mobility’s business.
The following companies were selected by Voice Mobility and
maintained by NASDAQ:
|
Comverse
Technology Inc.
3Com Corp
Glenayre Technologies Inc.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF
CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
We have set
forth in the following table certain information regarding our
common stock beneficially owned on December 31, 2001 for (i) each
shareholder we know to be the beneficial owner of 5% or more of our
outstanding common stock, (ii) each of our executive officers and
directors, and (iii) all executive officers and directors as a
group. In general, a person is deemed to be a "beneficial owner" of
a security if that person has or shares the power to vote or direct
the voting of such security, or the power to dispose or to direct
the disposition of such security. A person is also deemed to be a
beneficial owner of any securities of which the person has the
right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days. As of
December 31, 2001, we had outstanding approximately 34,248,782
common share equivalents, consisting of 27,648,782 shares of Common
Stock, 6,600,000 shares of Common Stock issuable on conversion of
all outstanding Exchangeable Shares, represented by one Series A
Preferred Stock.
NAME OF BENEFICIAL OWNER(1) |
AMOUNT AND NATURE OF BENEFICIAL
OWNERSHIP |
PERCENT OF CLASS |
Edith M. Both 843 Ida Lane Kamloops, B.C. V2B 6V2 | 2,650,000i | 7.7%
|
William E. Krebs | 2,543,897ii | 7.4%
|
James J. Hutton | 2,146,778iii | 6.3%
|
Innovatia Inc. 4th Floor, Collins Bank Building 1869 Upper Water Street Halifax, Nova Scotia Canada B3J 1S9
| 1,986,071iv | 5.8%
|
Randy Buchamer | 83,333v | *
|
William Gardiner | 180,000vi | *
|
David H. Grinstead | 383,333vii | 1.1
|
James C. Hewett | 61,250viii |
*
|
Morgan Sturdy | 83,333ix | *
|
David D. Scott | 83,333x | *
|
Robert E. Neal
| 83,333xi
| *
|
Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (9 persons) | 5,648,590 | 16.5%
|
* | Less than 1% |
(1) | The address for each person named above is #180 - 13777 Commerce Parkway, Richmond, British Columbia, Canada V6V 2X3 unless otherwise indicated. |
|
i. | Stock owned by E.W.G. Investments Ltd. of which Ms. Both is a controlling shareholder. |
ii. | Includes 1,762,500 shares owned by Pacific Western Mortgage Corporation of which Mr. Krebs is the sole shareholder; of these, 512,500 are held in escrow. Includes 581,397 shares owned by Margit Kristiansen, Mr. Krebs' wife; of these, 257,923 are held in escrow. Mr. Krebs disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares owned by his wife. Includes 200,000 escrow shares held in a self-directed registered retirement savings plan. |
iii. | Includes 1,312,500 share held in escrow. Includes 36,778 shares which are owned by Janis Gurney, Mr. Hutton's wife, over which Mr. Hutton disclaims beneficial ownership; of these, 27,584 are held in escrow. Includes 250,000 Plan Options exerciseable in the next 60 days. Includes 110,000 shares held in a self-directed registered retirement savings plan; of these, 82,500 are held in escrow. |
iv. | Includes 37,500 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of underlying share warrants. |
v. | Includes 83,333 Plan Options exercisable within the next 60 days. |
vi. | Includes 160,000 Plan Options exercisable within the next 60 days. Includes 20,000 common shares; of these, 15,000 are held in escrow. |
vii. | Includes 383,333 Plan Options exercisable within the next 60 days. |
viii. | Includes 61,250 Plan Options exercisable within the next 60 days. |
ix. | Includes 83,333 Plan Options exercisable within the next 60 days. |
x. | Includes 83,333 Plan Options exercisable within the next 60 days. |
xi. | Includes 83,333 Plan Options exercisable within the next 60 days. |
ITEM 13. CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS.
During the year
ended December 31, 2001, Pacific Western Mortgage Corporation, a
corporation controlled by William Krebs, one of our directors, was
paid $11,867 [2000 - $85,000; 1999 - $40,392] for consulting
services.
During the year ended December 31, 2001, Karina Ventures, Inc. a
company controlled by John Curry, a director from August 2001 to
March 2002 and our former Chief Financial Officer, was paid $24,508
[2000 - $40,000; 1999 - $13,464] for consulting services.
During the year
ended December 31, 2001, we sold to Innovatia Inc., one of our
shareholders and a wholly owned subsidiary of Aliant Inc., and to
NB Tel, also a wholly owned subsidiary of Aliant Inc., products and
services totaling $202,011 [2000 - $68,649; 1999 - $42,072] .
Innovatia Inc. is a holder of more than 5% of our outstanding
stock.
On February 27, 2001, we entered into a three year development
agreement with Innovatia Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Aliant
Inc. Robert E. Neal, a member of our Board of Directors, is the
President of Innovatia, and serves as Aliant's nominee to our Board
pursuant to an understanding with Aliant. Our three year
development agreement with Innovatia is to develop a
carrier-classified unified communications product that will become
Aliant’s primary hosted messaging solution for business and
residential customers. Under the agreement, Innovatia will license
to us certain intellectual property on a non-exclusive
non-transferable basis for use in the development and verification
of current products and will provide specific professional, project
management, administrative and support services. In consideration
of the services provided, we originally agreed to pay quarterly
fees based directly on the value of the work performed beginning
February 1, 2001. We originally had the option to elect to pay for
some or all of the services in cash or common shares.
On December 28,
2001, Innovatia agreed to settle the value of the services provided
to date by Innovatia of $1,707,989 (Cdn$2,720,142) in the form of a
promissory note bearing interest at prime plus 1% (the prime rate
at December 31, 2001 was 4%). The promissory note is repayable in
quarterly payments over the term commencing July 1, 2002 and for
the ten consecutive quarters thereafter. Each quarterly payment is
due on or before the first business day following the quarter ended
and is calculated as the lesser of $142,314 (Cdn$226,678) or 40% of
the net aggregate amount of invoices issued by us to Aliant in the
preceding quarter. In the event that the net amount of invoices for
a quarter exceed $142,314 (Cdn$226,678), we will carry forward the
difference between net amount of invoices and $142,314
(Cdn$226,678) and include that amount in the calculation for the
following quarter. Payment for the period January 1, 2002 to June
30, 2002 will be calculated in the same manner and will be payable
on October 1, 2002 in addition to the payment for the third quarter
beginning July 1, 2002. We have the option to elect to settle some
or all of the amounts owing in cash, common shares or a combination
thereof and have the right at any time to prepay the whole or any
portion of the balance owing without penalty. Any part of the
principal amount or accrued interest not paid after the last
scheduled quarterly payment will be payable in common shares in
successive quarters thereafter. The equity value of such an
issuance is calculated based upon the weighted average trading
price of our common shares on the Toronto Stock Exchange over the
10 trading days immediately prior to the date on which such shares
are to be issued. The number of common shares issuable is
determined by dividing the amount due calculated in the same manner
above by Cdn$1.56.
On December 28,
2001, in connection with the issuance of the promissory note to
Innovatia, we issued 500,000 common shares to Innovatia at a market
price of $0.26 (Cdn$0.42) per share. The $132,059 (Cdn$210,000)
fair value of the common shares issued was deducted from the
original principal amount owing under the promissory note resulting
in a balance owing of $1,575,930 (Cdn$2,510,142) at December 31,
2001. In accordance with the requirements of the Toronto Stock
Exchange, the issuance of these shares was subject to our reducing
the balance of shares reserved for issuance under our current stock
option plan by 500,000 common shares until we receive shareholder
approval.
On March 4,
2002, we renegotiated the remaining term of the original
development agreement with Innovatia signed on February 27, 2001.
The term of the revised agreement is for the period January 1, 2002
to December 31, 2003. Innovatia will continue to provide the same
services as per the original agreement, however, in consideration
of the services provided, we agreed to pay Innovatia a cash royalty
within 30 days after the end of each calendar quarter equal to 10%
on the gross revenue received for the sale of our products globally
within the quarter. If the contract is terminated the royalty
payments will continue for six months after the termination
date.
On June 29,
2001, Tom O’Flaherty resigned his position as President and
Director of VMI. As part of his final settlement, Mr.
O’Flaherty will remain in salary continuance up to December
31, 2002. In the case of re-employment with another company, we are
required to pay the difference, if any, between his new monthly
base salary and the monthly base salary which he was earning at
VMI. Under the settlement, Mr. O’Flaherty agreed to forego
any rights he may have under his employment agreement to any
additional monetary bonuses and associated options for 2001 and
2002. As at December 31, 2001, we accrued $103,591 in salary
payable to Mr. O'Flaherty through December 31, 2002.
In August 2001,
Voice Mobility entered into an employment agreement with Randy
Buchamer, who serves as Chief Executive Officer of VMI. The
agreement provides for an annual salary of Cdn$200,000. Mr.
Buchamer’s agreement provides for the grant of options under
our Second Amended and Restated 1999 Stock Option Plan of 350,000
shares of VMII common stock for Cdn.$1.37 per share, which options
vest in equal thirds over the next three years.
In February
2000, Voice Mobility entered into an employment agreement with
David Grinstead, who serves as Executive Vice President of Business
Development of VMI. The agreement provides for an annual salary of
Cdn$130,000 and incentive compensation payments based on
performance. Mr. Grinstead’s agreement provided for the grant
of options under our 1999 Stock Option Plan of 500,000 shares of
VMII common stock for $2.125 per share, which options vest in equal
thirds over three years.
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, LIST AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
| (a) Exhibits |
| |
Exhibit No. | Description of Document |
| |
3.1 | Articles of Incorporation (1) |
3.2 | Articles of Amendment of Articles of Incorporation (1) |
3.6 | Amended and Restated Bylaws (4) |
4.1 | Common Stock Certificate (1) |
4.2 | Form of Warrant (1) |
4.3 | Certificate of Designation of Series A Preferred Stock (1) |
4.4 | Certificate of Designation of Series B Preferred Stock (5) |
4.5 | Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Designation of Series B Preferred Stock * |
5.1 | Opinion of Jones Vargas (6) |
10.1 | Amended and Restated 1999 Stock Option Plan (4) |
10.2 | Employment Agreement of James Jay Hutton (1) |
10.3 | Employment Agreement of William Gardiner (1) |
10.4 | Employment Agreement of Jason Corless (1) |
10.5 | Employment Agreement of Budd Stewart (1) |
10.6 | Employment Agreement of Geoff Heston (1) |
10.7 | Acquisition Agreement of Voice Mobility Inc. (1) |
10.8 | Agreement and Plan of Distribution of Equity Capital Group, Inc. (1) |
10.9 | List of Subsidiaries of Registrant (5) |
10.10 | Debt Settlement Agreement with Maritime Tel & Tel (1) |
10.11 | Voting, Support and Exchange Trust Agreement (1) |
10.12 | Debt Settlement Agreement with Pacific Western Mortgage Corporation (1) |
10.13 | Debt Settlement Agreement with Ernest Weir Gardiner (1) |
10.14 | Stock Purchase Agreement (1) |
10.15 | Form of Subscription Agreement (1) |
10.16 | Exchange Agreement (1) |
10.17 | Employment Agreement of Thomas G. O'Flaherty (5) |
10.18 | Employment Agreement of David Grinstead (5) |
10.19 | Form of Series B Preferred Stock Subscription Agreement (5) |
10.20 | Form of Class I Stock Purchase Warrant (5) |
10.21 | Escrow Agreement, as amended (6) |
10.22 | Agency Agreement (6) |
10.23 | Special Warrant Indenture (6) |
10.24 | Share Warrant Indenture (6) |
10.25 | Form of Subscription Agreements for Special Warrants (6) |
10.26 | LivingLAB Agreement Between Voice Mobility Inc. and Innovatia (6) |
10.27 | Non-Negotiable Promissory Note in favor of Ibex Investments Ltd., as amended (8) |
10.28 | Class K Stock Purchase Warrant (6) |
10.29 | Non-Negotiable Promissory Note in favor of Alliance Equities Ltd. (7) |
10.30 | Non-Negotiable Promissory Note in favor or Interior Holdings Ltd. (7) |
10.31 | Form of Class L Stock Purchase Warrant (7) |
10.32 | Non-Negotiable Promissory Note in favor of Alliance Equities Ltd.(8) |
10.33 | Non-Negotiable Promissory Note in favor of Interior Holdings Ltd.(8) |
10.34 | Form of Class M Stock Purchase Warrant (8) |
10.35 | Non-Negotiable Promissory Note in favor of Alliance Equities Ltd. (8) |
10.36 | Non-Negotiable Promissory Note in favor of Interior Holdings Ltd. (8) |
10.37 | Form of Class N Stock Purchase Warrant (8) |
10.38 | Escrow Agreement among the Company, Computershare Trust Company of Canada and certain shareholders of the Company dated July 3, 2001 (8) |
10.39 | Settlement Agreement between Thomas O'Flaherty and the Company dated June 29, 2001 (8) |
10.40 | Employment Agreement of Randy Buchamer* |
10.41 | Amended LivingLAB Agreement Between Voice Mobility Inc. and Innovatia Inc.* |
10.42 | Addendum to LivingLAB Agreement * |
10.43 | Employment Agreement of James Hutton * |
16.1 | Letter of Bedford Curry & Co., Chartered Accountants, regarding change in certifying accountants. (2) |
16.2 | Letter of Ernst & Young LLP, Chartered Accountants, regarding change in certifying accountants. (2) |
23.1 | Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Chartered Accountants * |
23.2 | Consent of Bedford Curry & Co., Chartered Accountants (8) |
23.3 | Consent of Jones Vargas (included in Exhibit 5.1) (6) |
24.1 | Power of Attorney (6) |
* Filed herewith.
(1) Previously submitted with our Registration Statement on Form
10-SB, as originally filed on September 17, 1999, and all
amendments thereto.
(2) Previously submitted with our Form 8-K, as filed on March 16,
2000.
(3) Previously submitted with our Form 10-KSB, as filed on March
30, 2000.
(4) Previously submitted with our Definitive Schedule 14A as filed
on May 19, 2000.
(5) Previously submitted with our Form 10-KSB, as filed on April
11, 2001.
(6) Previously submitted with our Registration Statement on Form
S-1, as originally filed on May 10, 2001
(7) Previously submitted with our Pre-effective Amendment No.#1 to
the Registration Statement on Form S-1, as filed on June 8,
2001.
(8) submitted with our Post-effective Amendment No.#1 to the
Registration Statement on Form S-1, as filed on July 16, 2001.
(b) Reports of
Form 8-K
We made no
filings on Form 8-K during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2001.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT
AUDITORS
To the Board of Directors and
Shareholders of
Voice Mobility International, Inc.
We have audited
the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Voice Mobility
International, Inc. as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and the
related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’
equity (deficiency) and cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 2001. These financial statements are
the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards
generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require
that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance
about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as
well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial
position of Voice Mobility International, Inc. at December 31, 2001
and 2000, and the consolidated results of its operations and its
cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December
31, 2001, in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States.
The accompanying
financial statements have been prepared assuming that Voice
Mobility International, Inc. will continue as a going concern. As
discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, the
Company’s recurring operating losses raise substantial doubt
about its ability to continue as a going concern.
Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also
described in Note 1. The financial statements do not include any
adjustments that might result from the outcome of this
uncertainty.
Vancouver, Canada, | | /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP |
January 28, 2002 (except for Note 13 |
which is as of March 8, 2002) | | Chartered Accountants
|
Voice Mobility International, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE
SHEETS
[See Note 1 - Nature of
Business and Basis of Presentation]
As at December 31 | (expressed in U.S. dollars) |
|
2001 |
2000 |
|
$ |
$ |
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
Current |
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
1,732,200 |
602,527 |
Restricted cash [note 8[c] ] |
|
2,000,000 |
Accounts receivable [net of allowance for doubtful debts: |
|
|
2001 - $26,014; 2000 - $4,222] [note 4] |
222,268 |
18,634 |
Other receivables |
266,881 |
50,886 |
Note receivable [notes 3 and 4] |
232,500 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
100,850 |
65,133 |
|
Total current assets |
2,554,699 |
2,737,180 |
Property and equipment, net [note 6] |
1,780,935 |
1,927,731 |
|
|
4,335,634 |
4,664,911 |
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY |
|
|
Current |
|
|
Accounts payable |
445,936 |
413,662 |
Accrued liabilities |
57,062 |
316,464 |
Employee related payables |
182,154 |
160,560 |
Note payable [note 3] |
205,000 |
|
Deferred revenue |
158,584 |
212,500 |
|
Total current liabilities |
1,048,736 |
1,103,186 |
|
|
|
Promissory note payable [note 7] |
1,575,930 |
|
|
Total liabilities |
2,624,666 |
1,103,186 |
|
Commitments and contingencies [note 11] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders’ equity [note 8] |
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value, authorized 100,000,000, |
|
|
27,648,782 outstanding [2000 - 20,201,282] |
27,649 |
20,202 |
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, authorized 1,000,000 |
|
|
Series A Preferred stock issued and outstanding, 1 |
1 |
1 |
Series B Preferred stock issued and outstanding, 585,698 [2000
- - 666,667] |
586 |
667 |
Additional paid-in capital |
31,323,354 |
22,871,377 |
Accumulated deficit |
(29,563,804) |
(19,323,693) |
Other accumulated comprehensive income |
(76,818) |
(6,829) |
|
Total stockholders’ equity |
1,710,968 |
3,561,725 |
|
|
4,335,634 |
4,664,911 |
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes |
|
|
Voice Mobility International, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
[See Note 1 - Nature of Business and Basis of Presentation]
As at December 31 | (expressed in U.S. dollars) |
|
2001 |
2000 |
1999 |
|
$ |
$ |
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
Sales [note 5] |
358,191 |
275,190 |
55,997 |
Cost of sales |
49,999 |
86,498 |
51,843 |
|
Gross profit |
308,192 |
188,692 |
4,154 |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
Sales and marketing [note 8[d] ] |
2,237,563 |
3,588,642 |
1,190,754 |
Research and development [note 8[d] ] |
4,618,284 |
2,709,048 |
2,250,153 |
General and administrative [note 8[d] ] |
3,623,980 |
3,639,028 |
2,351,643 |
Acquisition fee for recapitalization |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
10,479,827 |
9,936,718 |
5,992,550 |
|
Loss from operations |
10,171,635 |
9,748,026 |
5,988,396 |
Interest income |
(160,095) |
(113,490) |
|
Interest expense |
281,017 |
16,411 |
70,209 |
|
Loss before extraordinary items |
10,292,557 |
9,650,947 |
6,058,605 |
Extraordinary loss on settlement of debt [note
8[b] ] |
|
|
790,000 |
|
Net loss |
10,292,557 |
9,650,947 |
6,848,605 |
Foreign currency translation losses |
69,989 |
42,331 |
39,737 |
|
Comprehensive loss |
10,362,546 |
9,693,278 |
6,888,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share [note 8[f] ] |
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per share |
|
|
|
before extraordinary items |
(0.34) |
(0.46) |
(0.36) |
Basic and diluted loss per share |
(0.34) |
(0.46) |
(0.41) |
|
See accompanying notes
Voice Mobility International, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIENCY)
[See Note 1 - Nature of
Business and Basis of Presentation]
As at December 31 | (expressed in U.S. dollars) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
Common Stock |
Stock to be Issued |
Series A Preferred Stock |
Series B Preferred Stock |
Additional |
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Number |
|
Number |
|
Number |
|
Number |
|
Paid-in |
Accumulated |
Comprehensive |
|
|
of Shares |
Amount |
of Shares |
Amount |
of Shares |
Amount |
of Shares |
Amount |
Capital |
Deficit |
Income |
Total |
|
# |
$ |
# |
$ |
# |
$ |
# |
$ |
$ |
$ |
$ |
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 1998 |
8,400,000 |
59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,373,141) |
75,239 |
(1,297,843) |
Exchange of Voice Mobility Inc. common stock |
(8,400,000) |
(59) |
|
|
1 |
1 |
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
Acquisition of Equity Capital Group, Inc. |
453,756 |
454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(454) |
|
|
|
Stock to be issued pursuant to Acrex Ventures Ltd. stock
subscriptions |
8,327,099
|
8,327
|
90,901
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
1,255,582
|
|
|
1,264,000
|
Stock subscription receivable from Acrex Ventures Ltd. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(43,333)
|
|
|
(43,333) |
Acquisition fee for recapitalization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
200,000 |
Stock issued on settlement of Pacific Western Mortgage
Corporation note payable |
750,000
|
750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
249,250
|
|
|
250,000
|
Warrants issued on settlement of Ernest Gardiner note
payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,000
|
|
|
33,000
|
Warrants issued on settlement of Ibex Investment Ltd. note
payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
957,000
|
|
|
957,000
|
Stock issued on settlement of amounts due to Aliant Inc. |
1,428,571 |
1,429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
498,571
|
|
|
500,000
|
Common stock issued pursuant to exercise of common stock
warrants |
|
|
3,160,000
|
3,160
|
|
|
|
|
1,510,173
|
|
|
1,513,333
|
Stock based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,910,580 |
|
|
2,910,580 |
Foreign currency translation loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39,737) |
(39,737) |
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,848,605) |
|
(6,848,605) |
|
Balance December 31, 1999 |
10,959,426 |
10,960 |
3,250,901 |
3,251 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
7,570,427 |
(8,221,746) |
35,502 |
(601,605) |
|
Stock subscriptions received pursuant to stock subscriptions
from Acrex Ventures Ltd. |
90,901
|
91 |
(90,901)
|
(91)
|
|
|
|
|
43,333
|
|
|
43,333
|
Common stock issued pursuant to private placements, net of
share issue costs of $75,000 |
3,050,000
|
3,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,238,950
|
|
|
7,242,000
|
Common stock issued pursuant to exercise of common stock
warrants |
5,594,000 |
5,594 |
(3,160,000)
|
(3,160)
|
|
|
|
|
951,084
|
|
|
953,518
|
Common stock issued pursuant to exercise of stock options |
506,955
|
507 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
430,992
|
|
|
431,499
|
Preferred stock and detachable warrants issued pursuant to
private placement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
666,667
|
667
|
1,999,333
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
Beneficial conversion feature and deemed dividend on preferred
stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,451,000 |
(1,451,000) |
|
|
Stock based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,186,258 |
|
|
3,186,258 |
Foreign currency translation loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(42,331) |
(42,331) |
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,650,947) |
|
(9,650,947) |
|
Balance, December 31, 2000 |
20,201,282 |
20,202 |
|
|
1 |
1 |
666,667 |
667 |
22,871,377 |
(19,323,693) |
(6,829) |
3,561,725 |
|
Common stock issued pursuant to special warrants |
6,500,000 |
6,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,643,334 |
|
|
7,649,834 |
Common stock issued on settlement of amounts due to Innovatia
Inc. |
500,000
|
500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
131,559
|
|
|
132,059
|
Common stock issued pursuant to exercise of stock options |
447,500
|
447 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
405,178
|
|
|
405,625
|
Warrants issued pursuant to promissory notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
226,967 |
|
|
226,967 |
Series B preferred stock retraction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(80,969) |
(81) |
(352,378) |
109,552 |
|
(242,907) |
Dividends paid on preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(57,106) |
|
(57,106) |
Repurchase of vested stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31,500) |
|
|
(31,500) |
Stock based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
428,817 |
|
|
428,817 |
Foreign currency translation loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(69,989) |
(69,989) |
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,292,557) |
|
(10,292,557) |
|
Balance, December 31, 2001 |
27,648,782 |
27,649 |
|
|
1 |
1 |
585,698 |
586 |
31,323,354 |
(29,563,804) |
(76,818) |
1,710,968 |
|
See accompanying notes
Voice Mobility International, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
[See
Note 1 - Nature of Business and Basis of Presentation]
As at December 31 | (expressed in U.S. dollars) |
|
2001 |
2000 |
1999 |
|
$ |
$ |
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
Net loss |
(10,292,557) |
(9,650,947) |
(6,848,605) |
Non-cash items included in net loss |
|
|
|
Amortization |
909,746 |
545,988 |
148,150 |
Stock issued on settlement of amounts |
|
|
|
due to Innovatia, Inc. |
132,059 |
|
|
Promissory note payable issued for services |
1,575,930 |
|
|
Stock issued on settlement of amounts |
|
|
|
due to Aliant Inc. |
|
|
500,000 |
Extraordinary loss on settlement of note payable |
|
|
790,000 |
Stock based compensation |
428,817 |
3,186,258 |
2,910,580 |
Bad debt expense |
59,856 |
(17,331) |
204 |
Interest on promissory notes payable |
226,967 |
|
|
Loss on disposal of property and equipment |
5,391 |
|
|
|
|
(6,953,791) |
(5,936,032) |
(2,499,671) |
Net change in operating assets and liabilities [note
12] |
(655,274) |
456,469 |
406,026 |
|
Cash used in operating activities |
(7,609,065) |
(5,479,563) |
(2,093,645) |
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
Purchase of property and equipment |
(955,808) |
(1,857,636) |
(519,548) |
Proceeds on sale of property and equipment |
7,998 |
|
|
|
Cash used in investing activities |
(947,810) |
(1,857,636) |
(519,548) |
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of special warrants, |
|
|
|
net of financing costs |
7,649,834 |
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
7,102,033 |
|
Proceeds from release of preferred stock from escrow |
1,757,093 |
|
|
Proceeds on exercise of stock options |
405,625 |
431,499 |
|
Proceeds on exercise of warrants |
|
953,518 |
1,513,333 |
Proceeds on promissory notes payable and warrants |
1,404,214 |
|
|
Repayment of promissory notes payable |
(1,397,305) |
(624,360) |
|
Change in amounts due to Acrex Ventures Ltd. |
|
|
997,994 |
Cash proceeds from advances |
|
|
183,300 |
Repurchase of vested stock options |
(31,500) |
|
|
Dividends paid on preferred stock |
(57,106) |
|
|
|
Cash provided by financing activities |
9,730,855 |
7,862,690 |
2,694,627 |
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of foreign currency on cash |
(44,307) |
(43,676) |
2,165 |
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in cash and cash equivalents |
1,129,673 |
481,815 |
83,599 |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year |
602,527 |
120,712 |
37,113 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year |
1,732,200 |
602,527 |
120,712 |
|
See accompanying notes
1. NATURE OF BUSINESS AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Nature of business
Voice Mobility International, Inc., (the ‘Company’) is
a Nevada corporation engaged in the development and sales and
marketing of unified voice messaging software through its wholly
owned operating subsidiaries, Voice Mobility Inc. and Voice
Mobility (US) Inc. The Company’s Enhanced Messaging software
suite will allow for legacy voice-mail replacement and incremental
offerings such as real time call connect, voice-mail to e-mail, and
fax to e-mail services. These unified communication services are
facilitated by the creation of a single personal digital mailbox
that can receive any type of communication regardless of its
incoming format or medium. The Company’s principal geographic
markets include North America, Europe and Asia.
Basis of
presentation
The financial statements have been prepared by management in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States on a going concern basis, which contemplates the
realization of assets and the discharge of liabilities in the
normal course of business for the foreseeable future.
The Company incurred an operating loss of $10,171,635 for the year
ended December 31, 2001 [2000 - $9,748,026; 1999 - $5,988,396] that
raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going
concern. Management has been able, thus far, to finance the
operations, as well as the growth of the business, through a series
of equity and debt financing. Management plans to continue to seek
other sources of financing on favorable terms, however, there are
no firm commitments for any additional financing, and there can be
no assurance that any such commitment can be obtained on favorable
terms, if at all. Management believes it has implemented
significant cost reductions and expects to keep its operating costs
to a minimum until cash is available through financing or operating
activities. Management expects revenues to increase from in 2002
from the deployment of the unified communications software product
which will afford the Company the ability to fund its daily
operations and service its debt obligations. There are no
assurances that the Company will be successful in achieving these
goals.
In view of these conditions, the ability of the Company to continue
as a going concern is uncertain and dependent upon achieving a
profitable level of operations and, if necessary, on the ability of
the Company to obtain necessary financing to fund ongoing
operations. Management believes that its current and future plans
enable it to continue as a going concern. These financial
statements do not give effect to any adjustments which would be
necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going
concern and therefore be required to realize its assets and
discharge its liabilities in other than the normal course of
business and at amounts different from those reflected in the
accompanying financial statements.
1. NATURE OF BUSINESS
AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION (cont’d.)
For the years ending December 31, 1999 and prior, the Company was a
development stage company.
1999 Recapitalization
of the Company
These consolidated financial statements are the continuing
financial statements of Voice Mobility Inc. (VMI) a company
incorporated under the laws of the Canada Business Corporations Act
in 1993. Through a series of transactions in June 1999, VMI was
recapitalized and acquired the net assets of Voice Mobility
International, Inc. (VMII)(formerly Equity Capital Group,
Inc.) an inactive United States company registered on the NASD
Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board.
Prior to the reverse acquisition of VMII, the shareholders of VMI
had been negotiating to acquire Acrex Ventures Ltd. (Acrex)an
inactive public company trading on the Vancouver Stock Exchange
(VSE) with no assets or liabilities. Pending approval of this
transaction by the VSE, Acrex and VMI entered into four private
placements for proceeds totaling $1,400,000 (Cdn$2,022,500). The
net proceeds of $1,264,000 were advanced to VMI to fund operations.
Under these arrangements stock subscriptions in the private
placements entitled investors to one common stock of Acrex and one
warrant entitling the holder to acquire one common stock of Acrex.
At the time of this arrangement the fair value of the warrants was
determined to be nominal since the exercise price of these warrants
exceeded the fair value of the VMI common stock. This arrangement
between Acrex and VMI expired on March 31, 1999. In connection with
the acquisition of VMII, the Acrex investors agreed to assign all
proceeds from the four private placements to VMII and contribute an
additional $.02 per share for an aggregate $200,000, in exchange
for common stock and common stock warrants with terms and
conditions substantially identical to the warrants that would have
been issued by Acrex to the subscribers of its four private
placements. Accordingly, the issuance of common stock and warrants
of VMII to Acrex investors has been reflected as a recapitalization
of VMI in the amount of $1,264,000 in the year ended December 31,
1999. As at December 31, 1999, $43,333 was receivable from Acrex
investors and was presented as a reduction of additional paid in
capital. The $43,333 was collected in fiscal 2000.
1. NATURE OF BUSINESS
AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION (cont’d.)
VMI received advances in the form of notes payable from Pacific
Western Mortgage Corporation (PWMC)a shareholder of VMI and
Ernest Gardiner, an Acrex investor. In March 1999, these parties
agreed to settle amounts owing to them by VMI. PWMC agreed to the
issuance of 750,000 common shares of Acrex, at their fair value, in
settlement of $250,000 (Cdn$375,000) of amounts owing by VMI. The
fair value of the shares issued was determined by management to be
$0.35 (Cdn$0.50) per share. Ernest Gardiner agreed to the issuance
of warrants to acquire 101,000 common shares of Acrex at $0.35
(Cdn$0.50) per share, in settlement of $33,000 (Cdn$50,500) of
amounts owing by VMI. The fair value of the warrants was determined
to be equivalent to the debt settled.
Pursuant to share purchase agreements dated April 1, 1999
and June 24, 1999, the stakeholders of VMI, sold their interest,
and had transferred to them 125,000 shares of common stock of
Equity Capital Group, Inc. by the majority shareholder of Equity
Capital Group, Inc., and VMII issued 8,293,000 shares of VMII
common stock and the right to acquire an additional 6,600,000
shares of VMII common stock in exchange for $200,000 and all the
capital stock of VMI. As a result of this transaction, the
stakeholders in Voice Mobility and Acrex (consisting of the
original shareholders of VMI, certain shareholders of Acrex, and
the investors in the Acrex private placement) effectively acquired
15,018,000 common stock equivalents of VMII which represented a
controlling interest of approximately 90%. This transaction is
considered an acquisition of VMII (the accounting subsidiary/legal
parent) by VMI (the accounting parent/legal subsidiary) and has
been accounted for as a purchase of the net assets of VMII by VMI.
Accordingly, this transaction represents a recapitalization of VMI,
the legal subsidiary effective June 24, 1999.
VMI’s assets and liabilities are included in the consolidated
financial statements at their historical carrying amounts.
Operating results to June 24, 1999, are those of VMI. At June 24,
1999, VMII had no assets and no liabilities. For purposes of this
acquisition the fair value of the net assets of VMII of $nil was
ascribed to the 453,756 previously outstanding common stock of VMII
deemed to be issued in the acquisition. The additional $200,000
paid for this transaction was expensed as a fee for the
recapitalization in the year ended December 31, 1999.
2. SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies used
in the preparation of these consolidated financial statements:
Principles of
consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Voice
Mobility Inc., Voice Mobility (US), Inc., Voice Mobility Canada
Limited, an inactive company and VM Sub Limited, also an inactive
company. All intercompany balances and transactions have been
eliminated on consolidation.
Use of estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the period. Actual
results could differ from those estimates.
Revenue
recognition
The Company recognizes license revenue upon shipment of a product
to the client if a signed contract exists, the fee is fixed and
determinable, collection of resulting receivables is probable, and
any uncertainties with regard to customer acceptance are
insignificant. For contracts with multiple elements (e.g.
deliverable and undeliverable products, maintenance and other
services), the Company allocates revenue to each element of the
contract based on objective evidence of its fair value when it is
determinable. The Company recognizes revenue allocated to
undelivered products when the criteria for product revenue set
forth above are met.
To the extent that objective evidence of fair value is not
determinable, the Company defers revenue until the earlier of the
point at which (1) sufficient evidence exists or (2) all elements
of the arrangement have been delivered. If the only undelivered
element relates to post contract support, the Company defers
revenue and recognizes it ratably over the term of the
agreement.
2. SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES (cont’d.)
Foreign currency
These consolidated financial statements have been presented in
United States dollars. The functional currency of the Company is
the Canadian dollar. Accordingly, all assets and liabilities of the
Company, which are denominated in foreign currencies, are
translated at the year end exchange rate and revenues and expenses
are translated using a weighted average exchange rate for the
applicable period. Any exchange gains and losses resulting are
presented as cumulative foreign currency translation gains (losses)
within other accumulated comprehensive income.
Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign
currencies are translated at the exchange rate in effect at the
balance sheet date. Other balance sheet items and revenues and
expenses are translated at the exchange rates prevailing on the
respective transaction dates. Gains and losses on foreign currency
transactions are reflected in the consolidated statements of
operations.
Financial
instruments
The Company’s financial instruments consists of cash and cash
equivalents, accounts receivable, other receivables, note
receivable, accounts payable, note payable and promissory note
payable. Unless otherwise stated the fair value of the financial
instruments approximates their carrying value. The Company has not
entered into foreign exchange derivative contracts.
Cash and cash
equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash and short term deposits
with original maturities of ninety days or less and are recorded at
amortized cost.
Property and
equipment
Property and equipment are carried at cost. Amortization is
provided using the straight line method over the assets estimated
useful lives as follows:
Computer equipment | 3 years |
Computer software | 2 years |
Computer equipment for customer use | Term of contract |
Office equipment and furniture | 5 years |
Leasehold improvements | Term of the lease |
|
2. SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES (cont’d.)
The Company begins to amortize computer equipment for customer use
when the equipment is installed at the customer site. Amortization
on computer equipment for customer use is recorded as cost of sales
on the income statement.
In 2000, the Company changed its amortization policy from the
declining balance method to the straight line method. The
cumulative effect of this change in accounting policy was not
significant to the 2000 financial statements.
Software development
costs
Costs incurred internally to develop computer software products and
the costs to acquire externally developed software products (which
have no alternative future use) to be sold, leased or otherwise
marketed are charged to expense until the technological feasibility
of the product has been established. After technological
feasibility is established and until the product is available for
general release, software development, product enhancements and
acquisition costs will be capitalized and amortized on a product by
product basis.
Advertising
Advertising costs are expensed in the period incurred. Advertising
expense for the year ended December 31, 2001 was $162,000 [2000 -
$355,000; 1999 - $66,000] .
Stock based
compensation
The Company accounts for stock-based employee compensation
arrangements using the intrinsic value method in accordance with
the provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25,
for Stock Issued to Employees(25)and
complies with the disclosure provisions of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 123, for Stock-Based
Compensation(123)Under APB 25, compensation
expense for employees is based on the difference between the fair
value of the Company’s stock and the exercise price if any,
on the date of the grant. The Company accounts for stock issued to
non-employees at fair value in accordance with SFAS 123. The
Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine
the fair value of stock options granted to non-employees.
2. SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES (cont’d.)
Income taxes
The Company follows the liability method of accounting for income
taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are
determined based on the difference between the financial reporting
and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates
that will be in effect for the year in which the differences are
expected to reverse.
Earnings per share
Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing income
(loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted average
number of common stock and exchangeable shares outstanding for the
period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share reflects the dilutive
potential of outstanding securities using the treasury stock
method.
Comprehensive
income
Comprehensive income includes all changes in equity except those
resulting from investments by owners and distributions to owners.
Other accumulated comprehensive income consists only of accumulated
foreign currency adjustments for all years presented.
Recent
pronouncements
In August 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144
(144)for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
Assetswhich addresses financial accounting and reporting for
the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets and supersedes SFAS
121, for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for
Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Ofand the accounting and
reporting provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 30,
the Results of Operationsfor a disposal of a segment of
a business. SFAS 144 is effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2001. The Company does not expect that the adoption of
the Statement will have a significant impact on its financial
position and results of operations.
3. NOTES RECEIVABLE
AND PAYABLE
On August 8, 2001, a plaintiff commenced an action in the Superior
Court of California against the Company and the predecessor
corporation, Equity Capital Group, Inc. (ECG)to recover
damages as a result of an alleged breach of contract.
On October 10, 2001, the Company signed an indemnification
agreement with the former majority shareholder of ECG to indemnify
the Company against any claims or liabilities that existed prior to
the April 1, 1999 and June 1, 1999 share purchase agreements
described in Note 1 - 1999 Recapitalization of the Company.
Also on October 10, 2001, the Company and the former majority
shareholder of ECG signed a settlement agreement, a security
agreement for specified manufacturing assets of an existing
business and a stock pledge agreement for 10,000 common shares of
Coast Envelope, a California company, held by the former majority
shareholder of ECG. In accordance with the settlement agreement,
the former shareholder is to pay the Company $290,000 to cover the
costs of the plaintiff settlement and additional related legal
expenses. The settlement amount is to be paid in set installments
from October 10, 2001 to October 25, 2002. The security and stock
pledge agreements are in place to further collateralize the
Company’s position in addition to the indemnification
agreement. As at December 31, 2001, the outstanding balance on the
note receivable is $232,500.
On October 15, 2001, a settlement agreement and mutual release was
signed between the Company and the above noted plaintiff. The
settlement agreement sets forth payments owing to the plaintiff by
the Company in the sum of $252,500 to be paid in set installments
from October 10, 2001 to October 1, 2002. As at December 31, 2001,
the outstanding balance on the note payable is $205,000.
4. CONCENTRATION OF
CREDIT RISK
Financial instruments, which potentially subject the Company to
concentrations of credit risk, consist principally of cash and cash
equivalents, accounts receivables and the note receivable. The
Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and
maintains allowances for potential credit losses which, when
realized, have been within the range of management’s
expectations.
Amounts owing from one customer comprised 92% of the accounts
receivable balance at December 31, 2001. Amounts owing from three
customers comprised 86% of the accounts receivable balance at
December 31, 2000.
5. SEGMENTED
INFORMATION
The Company operates in one major line of business, the
development, manufacture and marketing of unified voice messaging
systems. The Company derived substantially all of its revenues to
external customers from sales by its Canadian operations and has
substantially all its assets in Canada. Sales to one customer
comprised 56% of revenues in 2001. Sales to three customers
comprised 93% of revenues in 2000. Sales to three customers
comprised 100% of revenues in 1999.
Revenue from external customers, by location of customer, is as
follows:
|
Canada
|
US |
Barbados |
Other |
Consolidated
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2001 |
301,991 |
41,200 |
|
15,000 |
358,191 |
2000 |
78,611 |
106,126 |
90,453 |
|
275,190 |
1999 |
55,997 |
|
|
|
55,997 |
|
6. PROPERTY AND
EQUIPMENT
|
Accumulated Cost |
Amortization |
Net Book Value |
|
$ |
$ |
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
2001 |
|
|
|
Computer equipment |
2,256,869 |
1,059,176 |
1,197,693 |
Computer software |
556,056 |
352,959 |
203,097 |
Computer equipment for customer use |
227,966 |
17,712 |
210,254 |
Office equipment and furniture |
183,465 |
61,967 |
121,498 |
Leasehold improvements |
108,663 |
60,270 |
48,393 |
|
|
3,333,019 |
1,552,084 |
1,780,935 |
|
|
|
|
|
2000 |
|
|
|
Computer equipment |
1,975,443 |
476,277 |
1,499,166 |
Computer software |
401,356 |
185,986 |
215,370 |
Office equipment and furniture |
177,826 |
38,456 |
139,370 |
Leasehold improvements |
107,236 |
33,411 |
73,825 |
|
|
2,661,861 |
734,130 |
1,927,731 |
|
7. PROMISSORY NOTE
PAYABLE
On February 27, 2001, the Company entered into a three-year
development agreement with Innovatia Inc. (Innovatia) an existing
shareholder of the Company and a wholly owned subsidiary of Aliant
Inc. (Aliant) The purpose of the agreement is to develop
a carrier-classified unified communications product to which the
Company will have exclusive title. Under the agreement, Innovatia
will license certain intellectual property to the Company on a
non-exclusive non-transferable basis for use in the development and
verification of current products and will provide specific
professional, project management, administrative and support
services. In consideration of the services provided, the Company
agreed to pay $5.7 million over three years in quarterly
installments of $475,000 commencing the quarter ended April 30,
2001. The Company had the option to pay for some or all of the
services in cash or common shares. It is the Company’s
intention to negotiate a non-exclusive licensing agreement with
Aliant for use of the product.
On
December 28, 2001, the Company and Innovatia agreed to terminate
the three-year development agreement. In settlement of the services
provided under this agreement, the Company issued to Innovatia a
Canadian dollar denominated promissory note in the amount of
$1,707,989 (Cdn $2,720,142). Immediately thereafter, the Company
repaid $132,059 (Cdn $210,000) of the promissory note by issuing
500,000 common shares at a market price of $0.26 (Cdn $0.42) per
share. In accordance with the requirements of the Toronto Stock
Exchange, the issuance of these common shares resulted in an
equivalent reduction in the number of common shares reserved for
issuance under the Company’s current stock option plan.
The promissory note bears interest at prime plus 1% (prime rate at
December 31, 2001 was 4%) and is repayable in quarterly
installments until repaid in full. The amount payable each quarter
(Amount Payable) is the lesser of $142,314 (Cdn $226,678)
and 40% of the net aggregate amount of invoices
(Amount) issued by the Company to Aliant in the quarter.
The Maximum Amount Payable, if any, for the first two quarters
ended June 30, 2002 will be due on October 1, 2002. All subsequent
amounts payable, if any, will be due on or before the first
business day following the quarter end date. In the event the
Invoiced Amount for a particular quarter exceeds $142,314
(Cdn$226,678), the Company will carry forward the difference
between the Invoiced Amount and $142,314 (Cdn$226,678) and include
the difference in the calculation of Maximum Amount Payable for
subsequent quarters. The Company has the option, until December 31,
2004, to settle some or all of the promissory note, principal and
interest, in cash, common shares or a combination thereof. If paid
by common shares, the number of common shares issuable is
determined by the weighted average trading price of the
Company’s common share on the Toronto Stock Exchange over the
ten trading days immediately prior to the date on which the common
shares are to be issued.
7. PROMISSORY NOTE
PAYABLE (cont’d.)
After December 31, 2004, any amount of the promissory note which
remains unpaid will continue to be settled as the lesser of
$142,314 (Cdn$226,678) and 40% of the net aggregate amount of
invoices issued by the Company to Aliant in the quarter, however
the Company is required to settle only with common shares and the
number of common shares payable each quarter, if any, is determined
by dividing the Maximum Amount Payable by Cdn$1.56. The Company is
required to obtain shareholders and regulatory approval to issue
common shares to settle the promissory note, other than for the
500,000 common shares issued on December 28, 2001. If such approval
is not obtained, the Company can only repay the promissory note in
cash.
8. SHARE CAPITAL
[a] Authorized
On June 9, 2000, the Board of Directors approved a resolution to
increase the authorized shares of common stock from 50,000,000 to
100,000,000, par value $.001 per share. The Company is also
authorized to issue up to 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par
value $.001 per share.
In connection with the 1999 recapitalization of VMI described in
note 1, Voice Mobility Canada Limited (VM Canada) issued 6,600,000
VM Canada Exchangeable Shares. VM Canada is a wholly owned
subsidiary of VMII. Each VM Canada Exchangeable Share is
exchangeable for one VMII common share at any time at the option of
the shareholder, and will be exchanged no later than July 1, 2009,
and has essentially the same voting, dividend and other rights as
one VMII common share. A share of Series A preferred voting stock,
which was issued to a trustee in trust for the holders of the VM
Canada Exchangeable Shares, provides the mechanism for holders of
the VM Canada Exchangeable Shares to have voting rights in VMII.
The Company considers each Exchangeable Share as equivalent to a
share of its common stock and therefore the Exchangeable Shares are
included in the computation of basic earnings per share.
8. SHARE CAPITAL
(cont’d.)
As at December 31, 2001 the holders of the Exchangeable Shares are
entitled to 6,600,000 individual votes in all matters of Voice
Mobility International, Inc. As the Exchangeable Shares are
converted into common stock of the Company, the voting rights
attached to the share of Series A preferred voting stock are
proportionately reduced.
[b] Common stock
2001
Public Offering
On April 3, 2001, the Company completed an offering of 6,500,000
Special Warrants at a price of Cdn$2.00 per Special Warrant for
aggregate gross proceeds of $8,429,440 (Cdn$13,000,000). Each
Special Warrant was exercisable, without payment of additional
consideration, into one Unit of the Company (a Unit)Each
Unit consisted of one common share and one half of one
non-transferable share purchase warrant of the Company. Each whole
warrant entitles the holder to acquire one common share at a price
of Cdn$2.25, or on a cashless basis, at any time on or before April
3, 2003. The cashless exercise provision allows the holder to
utilize the net appreciation in the market value of the underlying
common stock to pay the exercise price.
The
Special Warrants were exercised by the holders on July 20, 2001,
being the fifth business day following the Datewhich
was the latest of: (i) June 8, 2001, the date a registration
statement for the underlying securities was declared effective by
the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, and (ii) July
10, 2001, the date the last receipt was issued for a final
prospectus qualifying the issuance of the underlying securities by
the British Columbia, Alberta, Ontario, Quebec and New Brunswick
securities regulatory commissions and (iii) July 15, 2001, the day
preceding the date the listing of the Company’s common shares
on The Toronto Stock Exchange became effective.
The agents were paid a commission of $590,084 (Cdn$910,000),
representing 7% of the gross proceeds, and were reimbursed $64,844
(Cdn$100,000) in legal costs. The company also incurred $124,678
(Cdn$192,271) in legal and professional fees. The aggregate
financing costs of $779,606 (Cdn$1,202,271) were recorded as a
reduction to the gross proceeds within stockholders’
equity.
In addition, the agents received a special compensation option
that entitles them to purchase 650,000 Units at Cdn$2.00 per Unit
at any time on or before April 3, 2003. Each Unit consists of one
common share (the option)and one-half of one common
share purchase warrant (the warrant)each whole
compensation warrant being exercisable to purchase one additional
common share at a price of Cdn$2.25 per share at anytime on or
before April 3, 2003.
8. SHARE CAPITAL
(cont’d.)
In addition to the direct financing costs, the Company incurred
costs of $94,068 in respect of the Canadian prospectus and $137,483
in respect of the U.S. registration statement which were expensed
in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.
Promissory Notes and Warrants
Between the months of April to July 2001, the Company issued a
series of promissory notes to shareholders in the aggregate
principal amount of $1,404,214 (Cdn$2,150,000), which were
repayable on the earlier of July 18, 2001 or the next equity
financing. No interest accrued on the notes. Fees of $48,580
(Cdn$74,750) were due on maturity. In connection with the issuance
of the notes, the Company issued a series of 633,334 warrants
(100,000 Class K warrants, 166,667 Class L warrants, 200,000 Class
M warrants, and 166,667 Class N warrants), each entitling the
holder to one share of common stock per warrant, exercisable at
$1.50 per share with expiry dates ranging from April 25, 2004 to
June 25, 2004. The notes including the fees were repaid in full for
$1,445,885 (Cdn$2,224,750) on July 17, 2001.
The gross proceeds have been allocated to the promissory notes and
the Class K, L, M and N warrants based on the relative fair value
of each security at the time of issuance. Accordingly, $1,177,247
was allocated to the promissory notes and $226,967 was allocated to
the Class K, L, M and N warrants in aggregate. The fair value of
the warrants was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing
model. The discount on the notes as a result of the warrants was
subject to accretion over the term to maturity of the promissory
notes. As at December 31, 2001, the $226,967 discount and the
$48,580 fees have been recorded as interest expense.
On December 28, 2001, the Class L, M and N warrants were cancelled
[Note 8[e] ] .
8. SHARE CAPITAL
(cont’d.)
2000
Private Placements
On February 15, 2000 the Company issued 2,250,000 units, at $2 per
unit for gross cash proceeds of $4,500,000. Each unit comprises one
share of common stock and one Class F warrant, entitling the holder
to one common share, exercisable at $5.50 at any time up to
February 15, 2005. The Company also issued 100,000 common shares
and $75,000 cash to third parties as a finders fee. Cash proceeds
of $4,241,700 were received in fiscal 2000 from the issuance of the
units, net of the $75,000 finders fee and the $183,300 in unsecured
advances received in December 1999. On December 2, 2000, the Board
of Directors amended the exercise price of the Class F warrants to
$2.25 and amended the expiry date to November 3, 2003. On December
28, 2001, 1,000,000 Class F warrants were cancelled [Note
8[e] ] .
On July 1, 2000 the Company issued 500,000 units, at $5.50 per unit
for net cash proceeds of $2,750,000. Each unit comprises one share
of common stock and three Class G warrants, entitling the holder to
one share of common stock per warrant, exercisable at $5.50 at any
time up to July 1, 2003. On December 2, 2000, the Board of
Directors amended the exercise price of the Class G warrants to
$2.25 and amended the expiry date to November 30, 2003. On December
28, 2001, the 1,500,000 Class G warrants were cancelled [Note
8[e] ] .
On September 29, 2000, the Company issued 200,000 units, at $0.335
per unit for net cash proceeds of $67,000. Each unit comprises one
share of common stock and one Class H warrant, entitling the holder
to one share of common stock per warrant, exercisable at $0.50 at
any time up to December 29, 2000. On December 20, 2000, 200,000
Class H warrants were exercised for net cash proceeds of
Cdn$100,000.
1999
Common Stock and Warrants Issued on Settlement of Debt
By an agreement dated March 26, 1999 Aliant Inc.
(Aliant)Acrex, and VMI agreed to recognize past contributions
of Aliant on a joint development project to a maximum amount of
$335,200 (Cdn$500,000). It was agreed that VMI would not be
required to reimburse Aliant the $335,200, unless VMI became a
public company or was owned by a public company. On March 26, 1999
it was determined this amount would be settled by the issuance of
1,428,571 shares of the public entity. The identical terms of the
debt settlement agreement involving Acrex were assumed by VMII. The
development project expense including a beneficial conversion
feature of $164,800, calculated at its intrinsic value at the
commitment date, was recorded as research and development
expense.
8. SHARE CAPITAL
(cont’d.)
On June 29, 1999, the Company issued 500,000 warrants with an
exercise price of $0.35 per common stock in settlement of a
$167,000 loan and a revision to the repayment terms of a $628,770
(Cdn$907,500) note payable to Ibex Investment Ltd. (Ibex)The
Company has recorded an extraordinary loss of $790,000 based on the
difference between the fair value of the equity instruments issued
and the carrying value of the debt settled. The fair value of the
warrants granted to Ibex was estimated on the date of the grant
using the Black Scholes option pricing model with the following
assumptions: no dividend yield; risk free interest rate of 5.5%;
expected volatility of 89%; and an expected life of one year.
[c] Preferred stock
On December 29, 2000 the Company issued 666,667 units at $3.00 per
unit for cash proceeds of $2,000,000. Each unit comprised one share
of Series B non-voting convertible preferred stock and three
quarter of a Class I warrant, entitling the holder to one share of
common stock per warrant, exercisable at $1.75 at any time up to
November 29, 2003. Each share of Series B preferred stock is
convertible, at the option of the holder, into two shares of common
stock and will automatically be converted into common stock as of
December 31, 2002. Holders of the Series B preferred stock are
entitled to a $0.195 per annum dividend. The dividends are not
cumulative. The funds and the preferred stock certificates were
placed in escrow pursuant to an escrow agreement. The funds could
be withdrawn by the Company in increments of up to $500,000 on
January 15, 2001, January 31, 2001, February 15, 2001 and February
28, 2001 on a cumulative basis and the preferred stock certificates
would be released to the investors concurrent with the cash
disbursements. At December 31, 2000, the proceeds were presented as
restricted cash.
Based on the relative fair values of the preferred stock and
detachable warrants on the date of issuance, the Company allocated
$1,451,000 of the proceeds to preferred stock and $549,000 of the
gross proceeds to the warrants. The agreement contains a beneficial
conversion feature that allows the investors to convert the
preferred stock to common stock at an effective conversion rate
which is less than the closing price of the Company’s common
stock on December 29, 2000. The amount of the beneficial conversion
feature is limited to the proceeds allocated to the preferred stock
of $1,451,000 and is presented as a preferred stock dividend.
The agreement provides that under certain conditions, the Company
can retract, at its option, the Series B preferred stock, at $3.00
per share together with all accrued and unpaid dividends. On March
30, 2001, the Company retracted 80,969 Series B Preferred shares at
$3.00 per share for aggregate cash of $242,907. The retraction
reduced the number of Series B Preferred shares outstanding from
666,667 to 585,698. Upon retraction, a portion of the retraction
price was allocated to the beneficial conversion feature and
decreased net loss attributable to common stockholders by
$109,552.
8. SHARE CAPITAL
(cont’d.)
On August 14, 2001, the Company paid cash dividends of $57,106 to
holders of Series B preferred stock.
On December 28, 2001, the Class I warrants were cancelled [Note
8[e] ] .
[d] Stock options
Second Amended and Restated 1999 Stock Option Plan
On June 14, 2001, an amendment to the Amended and Restated 1999
Stock Option Plan was approved to meet the requirements for listing
of the Company’s securities on The Toronto Stock
Exchange.
The
Second Amended and Restated 1999 Stock Option Plan
(Plan)authorizes an aggregate amount of 10,000,000 common
shares to be issued pursuant to the exercise of stock options.
The Plan provides for the granting of options which either qualify
for treatment as incentive stock options or non-statutory stock
options and entitles directors, employees and consultants to
purchase common shares of the Company. Options granted are subject
to approval of the Board of Directors or the Stock Option
Committee.
The options generally vest over a period of two to three years from
the date of grant and immediately become exercisable once vested.
Any options that do not vest as the result of a grantee leaving the
Company are forfeited and the common shares underlying them are
returned to the reserve. The options generally have a term of five
years.
8. SHARE CAPITAL
(cont’d.)
Activity under the Plan is as follows:
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
Shares Available for Grant |
Number of Shares |
Price per Share |
Weighted Average Exercise Price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 1998 |
|
|
|
|
Shares authorized |
5,000,000 |
|
|
|
Options granted |
(3,252,750) |
3,252,750 |
0.75 - 2.38 |
$0.94 |
Options forfeited |
265,834 |
(265,834) |
0.75 |
$0.89 |
|
Balance, December 31, 1999 |
2,013,084 |
2,986,916 |
0.75 - 2.38 |
$0.94 |
Additional shares authorized |
5,000,000 |
|
|
|
Options granted |
(4,577,795) |
4,577,795 |
0.75 - 9.50 |
$4.13 |
Options forfeited |
74,180 |
(74,180) |
0.75 - 2.00 |
$1.19 |
Options exercised |
|
(506,955) |
0.75 -3.05 |
$0.87 |
|
Balance, December 31, 2000 |
2,509,469 |
6,983,576 |
0.75 - 9.50 |
$3.03 |
Options granted |
(2,207,732) |
2,207,732 |
0.35 - 2.75 |
$2.04 |
Options forfeited |
2,298,872 |
(2,298,872) |
0.75 - 9.50 |
$4.48 |
Options exercised |
|
(447,500) |
0.75 - 1.00 |
$0.89 |
Common shares issued to |
|
|
|
|
Innovatia, Inc. [note 7] |
(500,000) |
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2001 |
2,100,609 |
6,444,936 |
0.35 - 7.25 |
$2.16 |
|
The weighted average remaining contractual life and weighted
average exercise price of options outstanding and of options
exercisable as at December 31, 2001 are as follows:
|
Options Outstanding |
Options Exercisable |
|
|
|
Range of
Exercise
Prices |
Number
Outstanding at
December 31,
2001 |
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price |
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life (years) |
Number
Exercisable at
December 31,
2001 |
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price |
|
$0.35 - 1.00 |
2,650,917 |
$0.84 |
4.80 |
1,876,139 |
$0.86 |
$1.01 - 3.00 |
2,662,632 |
$2.02 |
4.15 |
1,393,289 |
$2.08 |
$3.01 - 5.00 |
36,000 |
$3.05 |
3.10 |
21,556 |
$3.05 |
$5.01 - 7.00 |
970,387 |
$5.49 |
3.80 |
598,304 |
$5.48 |
$7.01 - 7.25 |
125,000 |
$7.25 |
4.30 |
125,000 |
$7.25 |
|
|
6,444,936 |
$2.16 |
4.30 |
4,014,288 |
$2.18 |
|
As at December 31, 2001, 1,496,006 [2000 nil] options
outstanding have an exercise price denominated in Canadian dollars
with a weighted average exercise price of Cdn$1.82.
8. SHARE CAPITAL (cont’d.)
The Company incurred non-cash stock based compensation expense
reported in the statement of operations as follows:
|
2001 |
2000 |
1999 |
|
$ |
$ |
$ |
|
Sales and marketing |
- |
1,178,996 |
597,891 |
Research and development |
257,934 |
964,673 |
1,023,429 |
General and administrative |
170,883 |
1,042,589 |
1,289,260 |
|
|
428,817 |
3,186,258 |
2,910,580 |
|
Of the $428,817 total stock based compensation expense in 2001,
$125,250 relates to options granted to consultants at fair value
[2000 - $880,500; 1999 - $nil] . The remaining $303,567 [2000 -
$965,820; 1999 - $2,910,580] is a result of options granted to
employees in 2000 and 1999 with an exercise price less than the
market price of the common stock on the date of grant.
As at December 31, 2001, the Company has $21,765 [2000 - $325,332;
1999 - $1,106,656] in deferred compensation to be expensed in
future periods based on the vesting terms of the underlying fixed
plan options.
Pro forma disclosure of stock based compensation
Pro forma information regarding results of operations and earnings
(loss) per share is required by SFAS 123 for stock-based awards to
employees as if the Company had accounted for such awards using a
valuation method permitted under SFAS 123.
8. SHARE CAPITAL (cont’d.)
The fair value of the Company’s stock-based awards granted to
employees in 2001, 2000 and 1999 was estimated using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model. The option pricing assumptions
include a dividend yield of 0%, a weighted average expected life of
2.5 years [2000 - 2.5 years; 1999 - 2.0 years] , a risk free
interest rate of 3.20% [2000 - 5.87%; 1999 - 5.50%] and an expected
volatility of 114% [2000 - 118%; 1999 - 89%] . The weighted average
fair value of options granted during 2001 was $0.78 [2000 - $3.15;
1999 - $1.60] . For pro forma purposes, the estimated value of the
Company’s stock-based awards to employees is amortized over
the vesting period of the underlying options. The effect on the
Company’s net loss and loss per share of applying SFAS 123 to
the Company’s stock-based awards to employees would
approximate the following:
|
2001 |
2000 |
1999 |
|
$ |
$ |
$ |
|
Net loss attributable to common
shareholders |
(10,240,111) |
(11,101,947) |
(6,848,605) |
Compensation expense |
(2,284,347) |
(4,112,466) |
(439,786) |
|
Pro forma net loss |
(12,524,458) |
(15,214,413) |
(7,288,391) |
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per share |
|
|
|
As reported |
(0.34) |
(0.46) |
(0.41) |
Pro forma |
(0.42) |
(0.63) |
(0.43) |
|
8. SHARE CAPITAL (cont’d.)
[e] Warrants
The Company has the following common stock warrants
outstanding:
|
Warrants
Outstanding at
January 1
# |
Warrants
Issued
# |
Warrants
Exercised
# |
Warrants
Cancelled
# |
Warrants
Outstanding at
December 31
# |
Exercise
Price
$US |
Expiry
Date |
Proceeds
on Exercise
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1999 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A warrants |
|
1,600,000 |
(400,000) |
|
1,200,000 |
0.35 |
Dec. 29/00 |
133,333 |
Class B, C and D warrants |
|
3,193,000 |
(2,760,000) |
|
433,000 |
0.50 |
Dec. 29/00 |
1,380,000 |
Class E warrants |
|
601,000 |
|
|
601,000 |
0.35 |
Dec. 29/00 |
|
|
|
|
5,394,000 |
(3,160,000) |
|
2,234,000 |
|
|
1,513,333 |
|
2000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A warrants |
1,200,000 |
|
(1,200,000) |
|
|
0.35 |
Dec. 29/00 |
426,668 |
Class B, C and D warrants |
433,000 |
|
(433,000) |
|
|
0.50 |
Dec. 29/00 |
216,500 |
Class E warrants |
601,000 |
|
(601,000) |
|
|
0.35 |
Dec. 29/00 |
210,350 |
Class F and G warrants |
|
3,750,000 |
|
|
3,750,000 |
2.25 |
Nov. 30/03 |
|
Class H warrants |
|
200,000 |
(200,000) |
|
|
0.50 |
Dec. 29/00 |
100,000 |
Class I warrants |
|
500,000 |
|
|
500,000 |
1.75 |
Nov. 29/03 |
|
|
|
2,234,000 |
4,450,000 |
(2,434,000) |
|
4,250,000 |
|
|
953,518 |
|
2001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class F and G warrants |
3,750,000 |
|
|
2,500,000 |
1,250,000 |
2.25 |
Nov. 30/03 |
|
Class I warrants |
500,000 |
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
Cancelled |
|
Class K warrants |
|
100,000 |
|
|
100,000 |
1.50 |
Apr. 25/04 |
|
Class L warrants |
|
166,667 |
|
166,667 |
|
|
Cancelled |
|
Class M warrants |
|
200,000 |
|
200,000 |
|
|
Cancelled |
|
Class N warrants |
|
166,667 |
|
166,667 |
|
|
Cancelled |
|
Special warrants |
|
3,250,000 |
|
|
3,250,000 |
Cdn.2.25 |
Apr. 3/03 |
|
Compensation options |
|
650,000 |
|
|
650,000 |
Cdn.2.00 |
Apr. 3/03 |
|
Compensation warrants |
|
325,000 |
|
|
325,000 |
Cdn.2.25 |
Apr. 3/03 |
|
|
|
4,250,000 |
4,858,334 |
|
(3,533,334) |
5,575,000 |
|
|
|
|
As at December 31, 1999, the $1,513,333 cash proceeds on exercise
of 3,160,000 warrants was collected but the share certificates were
not issued until 2000. As a result, the 3,160,000 common shares
issuable at December 31, 1999 were reported as common stock to be
issued in the statement of stockholders’ equity.
On December 28, 2001, 3,533,334 warrants were cancelled by the
warrant holders for no additional consideration.
8. SHARE CAPITAL (cont’d.)
[f] Earnings (loss) per share
The following table sets forth the computation of earnings (loss)
per share:
|
2001 |
2000 |
1999 |
|
$ |
$ |
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before extraordinary items |
(10,292,557) |
(9,650,947) |
(6,058,605) |
Reduction of beneficial conversion feature on
retraction of 80,969 Series B preferred stock |
109,552 |
|
|
Dividends paid on preferred stock |
(57,106) |
|
|
Deemed dividend on beneficial conversion feature |
|
(1,451,000) |
|
|
Loss before extraordinary items attributable to
common stockholders |
(10,240,111) |
(11,101,947) |
(6,058,605) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
(10,292,557) |
(9,650,947) |
(6,848,605) |
Reduction of beneficial conversion feature on
retraction of 80,969 Series B preferred stock |
109,552 |
|
|
Dividends paid on preferred stock |
(57,106) |
|
|
Deemed dividend on beneficial conversion feature |
|
(1,451,000) |
|
|
Net loss attributable to common stockholders |
(10,240,111) |
(11,101,947) |
(6,848,605) |
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common stock
outstanding |
23,468,254 |
17,430,772 |
10,304,415 |
Weighted average number of common stock
issuable on exercise of exchangeable shares |
6,600,000 |
6,600,000 |
6,600,000 |
|
Weighted average number of common stock
equivalents outstanding |
30,068,254 |
24,030,772 |
16,904,415 |
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per share before
extraordinary items |
(0.34) |
(0.46) |
(0.36) |
Basic and diluted loss per share |
(0.34) |
(0.46) |
(0.41) |
|
8. SHARE CAPITAL (cont’d.)
For the years ending December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999, the
Company’s common shares issuable upon the exercise of stock
options, warrants and other convertible securities were excluded
from the determination of diluted loss per share as their effect
would be antidilutive.
9. INCOME TAXES
The Company is subject to United States federal and state income
taxes at an approximate rate of 35%. The reconciliation of the
provision (recovery) for income taxes at the United States federal
statutory rate compared to the Company’s income tax expense
is as follows:
|
2001 |
2000 |
1999 |
|
$ |
$ |
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
Tax expense (recovery) at U.S. statutory rates |
(3,602,000) |
(3,860,000) |
(2,739,000) |
Lower (higher) effective income taxes of |
|
|
|
Canadian subsidiary |
|
(354,000) |
(383,000) |
Change in valuation allowance |
2,108,000 |
2,859,000 |
1,221,000 |
Change in opening valuation allowance for the |
|
|
|
reduction in future enacted tax rates |
931,000 |
|
|
Non-deductible expenses |
563,000 |
1,355,000 |
1,901,000 |
|
Income tax expense (recovery) |
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax
effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of
assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the
amounts used for income tax purposes. The Company has recognized a
valuation allowance for those deferred tax assets for which it is
more likely than not that realization will not occur.
Significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets
as of December 31 are as follows:
|
2001 |
2000 |
|
$ |
$ |
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss carryforwards |
6,195,000 |
4,308,000 |
Property and equipment |
567,000 |
346,000 |
|
Total deferred tax assets |
6,762,000 |
4,654,000 |
Valuation allowance |
(6,762,000) |
(4,654,000) |
|
Net deferred tax assets |
|
|
|
9. INCOME TAXES (cont’d.)
The net operating loss carryforwards expire as follows:
|
$ |
|
|
|
Canada |
|
2002 |
43,000 |
2003 |
163,000 |
2004 |
78,000 |
2005 |
845,000 |
2006 |
2,098,000 |
2007 |
2,698,000 |
2008 |
7,704,000 |
|
|
13,629,000 |
U.S. |
|
2019 |
269,000 |
2020 |
2,701,000 |
2021 |
713,000 |
|
|
3,683,000 |
|
|
17,312,000 |
|
10. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
In addition to the transactions described in notes 3, 7 and 8, the
Company had the following related party transactions in the normal
course of operations which were recorded at amounts established and
agreed between the related parties:
[a] During the year ended
December 31, 2001, Pacific Western Mortgage Corporation, a company
controlled by a shareholder and a Director of the Company, was paid
$11,867 [2000 - $85,000; 1999 - $40,392] for consulting
services.
[b] During the year ended
December 31, 2001, Karina Ventures Inc., a company controlled by a
shareholder and a Director of the Company, was paid $24,508 [2000 -
$40,000; 1999 - $13,464] for consulting services.
[c] During the year ended
December 31, 2001, the Company sold to Innovatia, Inc., a
shareholder of the Company and a wholly owned subsidiary of Aliant,
Inc., and to NB Tel, also a wholly owned subsidiary of Aliant,
Inc., products and services totaling $202,011 [2000 - $68,649; 1999
- - $42,072] . At December 31, 2001, $219,489 [2000 - $484; 1999 -
$18,015] is included in accounts receivable.
10. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
(cont’d.)
[d] During the year ended December 31, 2001, the Company purchased
from Innovatia, Inc., a shareholder of the Company and a wholly
owned subsidiary of Aliant, Inc., services totaling $1,707,989
[note 7] [2000 - $nil; 1999 - $nil] .
11. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
[a] The Company leases its
premises under operating leases. The minimum lease payments are as
follows:
|
$ |
|
|
|
2002 |
116,477 |
2003 |
68,801 |
2004 |
28,667 |
2005 |
-- |
2006 |
-- |
|
|
213,945 |
|
The rental expense charged to the consolidated statements of
operations in 2001 amounted to $247,000 [2000 - $189,000; 1999 -
$109,000] .
[b] On August 24, 2001, Manschot Opportunity Fund, LP and Galladio
Capital Management, BV filed suit in the Superior Court of the
State of California, County of Orange (Case No. 01CC10988) against
Voice Mobility International, Inc., Funkart Holdings, Inc., Pioneer
Growth Corporation, Robert L. Cashman and Greg Harrington. The suit
relates to an alleged December 1998 agreement between Motorsports
Promotions, Inc. and Funkart Holdings, Inc., during the time period
prior to Voice Mobility Inc.‘s April 1999 reverse acquisition
of Equity Capital Group, Inc., the predecessor company to Voice
Mobility International, Inc. Plaintiffs allege to be creditors of
Motorsports Promotions, acquiring Motorsports rights under the
alleged agreement at a UCC public sale. Defendant Funkart Holdings
is alleged to have been a subsidiary of Equity Capital Group during
the period in question, but which was assigned to Pioneer Growth
Corporation, a company unaffiliated with Voice Mobility
International, Inc. pursuant to the reverse acquisition. The suit
alleges that during the period in question, Voice Mobility
International, Inc. also was the alter-ego of defendant Cashman.
The suit alleges breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duty
and seeks compensatory damages in excess of $1,325,000, prejudgment
interest and punitive damages. The Company has tendered the defense
and indemnity of such claims to Mr. Cashman. Management believes
that there is no substantive merit to the claims and they intend to
defend the lawsuit vigorously if Mr. Cashman fails to perform the
defense and indemnification obligations he has accepted. The
Company has made no provision in the financial statements on the
belief that the probability of a loss is remote.
11. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
(cont’d.)
[c] On December 31, 2001, a former contract employee filed a Writ of
Summons and Statement of Claim with the Supreme Court of British
Columbia claiming breach of an implied employment contract and
Stock Option Agreement by the Company. The relief sought is damages
under several causes of action for an aggregate of approximately
$1,825,892. The Company believes that there is no substantive merit
to the claim and management intends to vigorously defend the
action. The Company has made no provision in the financial
statements on the belief that the probability of a loss is
remote.
[d] On June 29, 2001, Mr. O’Flaherty resigned his position as
President and Director of the Company. As part of his final
settlement, Mr. O’Flaherty will remain in salary continuance
up to December 31, 2002. In the case of re-employment with another
company, the Company will continue to pay the difference, if any,
between his new monthly base salary and the monthly base salary
which he was earning at the Company. Mr. O’Flaherty will also
forego any rights he may have under his employment agreement to any
additional monetary bonuses and associated options for 2001 and
2002. As at December 31, 2001, the Company has accrued $103,591 for
this matter.
12. SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Net changes in operating assets and liabilities are as follows:
|
2001 |
2000 |
1999 |
|
$ |
$ |
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
Change in accounts receivable |
(229,442) |
24,358 |
53,591 |
Change in other receivables |
(220,644) |
|
|
Change in note receivable |
(270,000) |
|
|
Change in prepaid expenses |
(39,791) |
(32,319) |
(15,302) |
Change in inventory |
|
89,575 |
(75,093) |
Change in accounts payable |
155,006 |
(3,957) |
225,214 |
Change in accrued liabilities |
(242,016) |
167,484 |
83,641 |
Change in employee payables |
30,115 |
88,316 |
43,598 |
Change in note payable |
205,000 |
|
|
Change in deferred revenue |
(43,502) |
123,012 |
90,377 |
|
|
(655,274) |
456,469 |
406,026 |
|
12. SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION
(cont’d.)
Non-cash investing and financing activities are as follows:
|
2001 |
2000 |
1999 |
|
$ |
$ |
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
Stock issued on settlement of amount due to Innovatia,
Inc. |
132,059 |
|
|
Restricted cash proceeds from issuance of preferred
stock and detachable warrants |
|
2,000,000 |
|
Stock and warrants issued to Acrex Ventures Ltd.
investors |
|
|
1,220,667 |
Stock issued on settlement of amount due to Aliant Inc. |
|
|
500,000 |
Stock issued on settlement of shareholder debt |
|
|
250,000 |
Warrants issued on settlement of Ibex Investment
Ltd. notes payable |
|
|
167,000 |
Warrants issued on settlement of Ernest Gardiner
notes payable |
|
|
33,000 |
|
Cash amounts paid for interest and income taxes are as
follows:
|
2001 |
2000 |
1999 |
|
$ |
$ |
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest |
54,000 |
16,000 |
70,000 |
Cash paid for income taxes |
1,500 |
|
|
|
13. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
[a] On March 4, 2002, the
Company and Innovatia signed a new development agreement. The
agreement to develop a carrier-classified unified communications
product is for the period January 1, 2002 to December 31, 2003.
Innovatia will continue to provide the same services as under the
previous development agreement described in Note 7. In
consideration for these services, the Company agreed to pay
Innovatia a cash royalty within 30 days after the end of each
calendar quarter equal to 10% on the gross quarterly revenue
received for the sale of the Company’s products. If the
development agreement is terminated the royalty payments will
continue for six months after the termination date.
13. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS (cont’d.)
[b] On March 6, 2002, an
exchangeable shareholder exchanged 500,000 Exchangeable Shares into
500,000 common shares of the Company for no additional
consideration.
[c] On March 8, 2002, a shareholder and Director of the Company
indemnified the Company against any losses that may be incurred on
the collectibility of the note receivable described in Note 3.
Quarterly Results of Operations
(Unaudited)
|
Fiscal 2001 Quarters Ended |
Fiscal 2000 Quarters Ended |
|
December 31, 2001 |
September 30, 2001(1) |
June 30, 2001 |
March 31, 2001 |
December 31, 2000 |
September 30, 2000(2) |
June 30, 2000(2) |
March 31, 2000(2) |
Sales |
241 |
39 |
34 |
44 |
42 |
106 |
34 |
93 |
Gross Profit |
218 |
21 |
29 |
40 |
38 |
68 |
22 |
61 |
Net Loss |
(1,345) |
(2,781) |
(3,197) |
(2,970) |
(1,883) |
(3,635) |
(2,188) |
(1,945) |
Basic and diluted loss per share |
$(0.04) |
$(0.10) |
$(0.12) |
$(0.11) |
$(0.08) |
$(0.15) |
$(0.09) |
$(0.08) |
(1) Sales for the
three-month period ended September 30, 2001, previously reported as
$388,621 on our Form 10Q filed on November 13, 2001, have now been
retroactively adjusted to $38,621 as a result of annual audit
adjustments.
(2) Cost of sales for the three-month period ended September 30,
2001, previously reported as $99,558 on our Form 10-Q filed on
November 13, 2001, have now been retroactively adjusted to $17,308
as a result of annual audit adjustment.
(3) As a result of year-end adjustments, certain amounts for prior
periods have been reclassified to conform to the current
presentations.
SIGNATURE
In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.
|
VOICE MOBILITY INTERNATIONAL, INC.
By: /s/ Randy G. Buchamer
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
By: /s/ James Hewett
James Hewett
Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
Date: March 28, 2002
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the
following persons of the registrant in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
Signature | Title | Date |
|
/s/ Randy G. Buchamer | Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer | March 28, 2002 |
Randy G. Buchamer | |
| |
/s/ James J. Hutton | President, Director | March 28, 2002 |
James J. Hutton | |
| |
/s/ William E. Krebs | Director | March 28, 2002 |
William E. Krebs | |
| |
/s/ Donald A. Calder | Director | March 28, 2002 |
Donald Calder | |
| |
/s/ Robert E. Neal | Director | March 28, 2002 |
Robert Neal | |
| |
/s/ Morgan P. Sturdy | Director | March 28, 2002 |
Morgan P. Sturdy | |
| |
/s/ F. David D. Scott | Director | March 28, 2002 |
F. David D. Scott | |
EXHIBIT 23.1
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
AUDITORS
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-45744 and Form S-8 No. 333-34564)
pertaining to the Amended and Restated 1999 Stock Option Plan of
Voice Mobility International, Inc. and in Post-Effective Amendment
No. 1 to the Registration Statement (Form S-1 No. 333-60678) and
related Prospectus and Prospectus Supplement No. 1 of our report
dated January 28, 2002 (except for Note 13 which is as of March 8,
2002), with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
Voice Mobility International, Inc. in the Annual Report (Form 10-K)
for the year ended December 31, 2001.
| /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP |
Vancouver, Canada, | |
March 28, 2002 | Chartered Accountants |
EXHIBIT 4.5
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
TO
CERTIFICATE OF THE DESIGNATIONS,
VOTING POWERS, PREFERENCES AND RELATIVE,
PARTICIPATING, OPTIONAL AND OTHER SPECIAL RIGHTS
AND QUALIFICATIONS, LIMITATIONS OR RESTRICTIONS OF THE
SERIES B NON-VOTING CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK OF
VOICE MOBILITY
INTERNATIONAL, INC.
The undersigned, the duly
elected and acting President and Assistant Secretary of Voice
Mobility International, Inc., a Nevada corporation, pursuant to NRS
78.1955 does hereby certify as follows:
WHEREAS, pursuant to
authority conferred upon the Board of Directors by ARTICLE IV of
the Articles of Incorporation of the Company (as amended to date,
the Articles the Board of Directors of the Company by unanimous
written consent dated December 27, 2000 adopted a resolution
creating a series of Preferred Stock designated as Series B
Non-Voting Convertible Preferred Stock of Voice Mobility
International, Inc.
WHEREAS, a certificate of
designation creating a series of Preferred Stock of the Company
designated as Series B Non-Voting Convertible Preferred Stock, was
filed with the Nevada Secretary of State on December 29, 2000 (the
Designation
WHEREAS, a certificate of
correction correcting a typographical error in the Original
Designation was filed with the Nevada Secretary of State on January
9, 2001 (the Original Designation as so corrected being herein
called the Designation
WHEREAS, pursuant to the
authority conferred upon the Board of Directors of the Company by
ARTICLE IV of the Articles and NRS 78.1955, the Board of Directors
of the Company at a meeting held June 29, 2001, adopted a
resolution adopting an amendment to the New Designation.
WHEREAS, a majority of
the holders of the outstanding shares of the Company’s Series
B Non-Voting Convertible Preferred Stock have granted their consent
to an amendment to the New Designation, and there is no class of
stock of the Company senior to such Series B Non-Voting Convertible
Preferred Stock as to the payment of distributions upon dissolution
of the Company.
WHEREAS, the foregoing
approval constitutes the approval required by NRS 78.1955(3) and
therefore the approval of the stockholders required by NRS
78.1955(3) has been obtained.
RESOLVED, that pursuant
to the authority granted by NRS 78.1955 to the Board of Directors
and the holders of the Company’s Series B Non-Voting
Convertible Preferred Stock, the New Designation is hereby amended
as follows:
Section 4(b) (Automatic
Conversion) is hereby amended in its entirety to provide as
follows:
"(b)Automatic Conversion. Each share of Series B Preferred
shall automatically be converted into shares of Common Stock at the
then effective Series B Conversion Rate upon the earlier of either
(i) December 31, 2002, or (ii) the written consent of the holders
of a majority of the then outstanding shares of Series B Preferred,
voting together as a single class."
Except as provided herein, the New Designation remains unaffected
hereby.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
Company has caused this Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of
Designations to be duly executed in its corporate name on this 19th
day of December, 2001.
|
VOICE MOBILITY INTERNATIONAL, INC.
By: /S/ James
Hutton
Name: James Hutton
Its: President
By: /s/ James
Hewett
Name: James Hewett
Its: Assistant Secretary
|
EXHIBIT 10.40
Private &
Confidential
August 16th, 2001
Randy Buchamer
2988 Brookridge Drive
North Vancouver, BC
V7R 3A8
Dear Randy:
This letter will confirm the offer by Voice Mobility Inc. (the
"Company") of employment to you in the position of CEO with your
start date to be August 16th, 2001. This offer will remain valid
until August 16th, 2001. The terms are as follows:
Office: You will be employed in the position noted above, located
in Vancouver, British Columbia, reporting to the ____Board of
Directors__________. You shall devote the whole of your working
time, attention and ability to the business of the Company. You
shall not, without written consent of the Company, accept other
employment, including part time employment. It is acknowledged that
the Company may be asked to approve your working on other projects,
outside of working hours, which are not in competition with, or
related to, any of your work at the Company. The Company will make
reasonable allowances for such work to be done by you outside of
working hours. It is agreed, however, that the Company may restrict
such work in their sole discretion (not to be unreasonably
withheld). Your employment as noted above, subject to the
Probationary Clause and the Termination Clause listed below, will
continue at the discretion of the Company.
Responsibilities: Your prime responsibilities will include:
Directs the overall business activities and organizational
policies. Develops, recommends and implements through subordinates,
approved annual and long-term organization policies and goals.
Major duties include directing company financial organization and
operations planning activities; approving budgetary and operations
objectives, monitoring performance relative to established
objectives; promoting positive relations with all external groups,
including customers, the financial community, government and the
general public.
Salary: You will be paid a gross annual salary of $CDN
200,000 plus a $500 per month auto allowance. Salary and
auto allowance will be paid on a semi-monthly basis. A review of
the salary will be done annually at the sole discretion of the
Company.
Hours of Work: We generally recognize "normal" business hours of 40
hours per week, a minimum of 8 hours per day, Monday to Friday
inclusive. You can expect, however, that while we have designated
"normal" office hours, this position will entail the need to work
additional hours from time to time to meet the objectives of the
position and overtime will not be paid.
Option Plan: You will be provided with _350,000__ options
with a strike price of $.90 US, on a three-year vesting basis. The
full details are provided by Mobility International, Inc.
Amended and Restated 1999 Stock Option Planand by
MOBILITY INTERNATIONAL, INC. EMPLOYEE NON-QUALIFIED STOCK
OPTION AGREEMENT PURSUANT TO THE 1999 STOCK OPTION PLAN
Benefits: Participation in the company Benefits plan begins
September 1st, 2001. VMI pays 50% of the monthly premiums. For full
details of the benefits plan, please see the Benefits By Design
Benefits Booklet dated November 1,2000.
Vacation: You will be entitled to three weeks of paid vacation per
year earned on the basis of 1.25 days per month, to be taken at a
time or times acceptable to the Company, acting reasonably, having
regard for its operational requirements.
Termination: If your employment is terminated for reasons other
than cause, you will receive notice or pay in lieu of notice for
the "Notice Period" as defined by the Employment Standards Act.
Proprietary Rights: As a condition of your employment you agree to
be bound by and execute the form of Proprietary Rights/ Non
Solicitation Agreement set out as
Schedule A.
Governing law and jurisdiction: This agreement shall be governed by
and construed in accordance with the law of The Province of British
Columbia and the laws of Canada therein.
If you are in agreement with the terms of this offer, please sign
and date one copy and return it to me.
Yours very truly
Voice Mobility Inc.
/s/ James Hutton
Jay Hutton
President
I accept employment on the terms and conditions outlined in this
letter.
December 5, 2001.
/s/ Randy Buchamer
_____________________________
Employee signature
PROPRIETARY RIGHTS /
NON-SOLICITATION AGREEMENT I, ___Randy Buchamer____,
recognize that Voice Mobility Inc. (the "Company") is engaged in a
continuous program of software research and development and the
marketing of software products and computer training programs, and
that the Company also provides technical support, consultation and
training services. I also recognize the importance of protecting
the Company's trade secrets, confidential information, partner and
customer relationships and other proprietary information and
related rights acquired through the Company's expenditure of time,
effort and money.
Therefore, because I wish
to be employed by the Company in a capacity in which I will receive
and/or contribute to the Company's Confidential Information, and in
consideration of the salary or wages I will receive from the
Company and for my employment by the Company, I agree to be bound
by the following terms and conditions:
1. Non-Disclosure of Confidential Information
At all times during and subsequent to the termination of my
employment with the Company, I shall keep in strictest confidence
and trust all confidential information. I shall take all necessary
precautions against unauthorized disclosure of the confidential
information, and I shall not directly or indirectly disclose, allow
access to, transmit or transfer the confidential information to a
third party, nor shall I copy or reproduce the Confidential
Information except as may be reasonably required for me to perform
my duties for the Company.
2. At all times during and subsequent to the termination of my
employment with the Company, I shall not use the confidential
information in any manner except as reasonably required for me to
perform my duties for the Company.
3. Upon the request of the Company, and in any event upon the
termination of my employment with the Company, I shall immediately
return to the Company all materials, including all copies in
whatever form, containing confidential information which are in my
possession or under my control.
5. I acknowledge and agree that I shall not acquire any right,
title or interest in or to the confidential information.
6. I hereby assign and transfer to the Company, and agree that the
Company shall be the exclusive owner of, all of my right, title and
interest to each development throughout the world, including all
trade secrets, patent rights, copyrights and all other intellectual
property rights therein. I further agree to cooperate fully at all
times during and subsequent to my employment with respect to
signing further documents and doing such acts and other things
reasonably requested by the Company to confirm such transfer of
ownership of rights, including intellectual property rights,
effective at or after the time the development is created and to
obtain patents or copyrights or the like covering the developments.
I agree that the obligations in this clause (b) shall continue
beyond the termination of my employment with the Company with
respect to Developments created during my employment with the
Company.
7. I agree to take all necessary precautions to protect the computer
systems and software of the Company and of the suppliers and
clients of the Company.
8. I agree that while I am employed by the Company, and for 12
months immediately following the termination of my employment with
the Company, I shall not, directly or indirectly, contact or
solicit any clients of the Company for the purpose of selling or
supplying to these clients or the Company any products or services
which are competitive with the products or services sold or
supplied by the Company at the time of my termination. The term
"Client of the Company" in the preceding sentence means any
business or organization that:
(a) was a client of the Company at the time of the termination of
my employment with the Company; or
(b) became a client of the Company within six months after the
termination of my employment with the Company if I was involved
with the marketing effort in respect of such client prior to the
termination of my employment with the Company.
9. I agree that while I am employed by the Company, and for 12
months after the termination of my employment with the Company, I
shall not directly or indirectly hire any employees of or
consultants or contractors to the Company nor shall I solicit or
induce or attempt to induce any persons who were employees of or
consultants to the Company at the time of such termination or
during the 90 days immediately preceding such termination, to
terminate their employment or consulting agreement with the
Company, without the prior consent of the Company.
10. I acknowledge and agree that damages may not be an adequate
remedy to compensate the Company for any breach of my obligations
contained in this Agreement, and accordingly I agree that in
addition to any and all other remedies available, the Company shall
be entitled to obtain relief by way of a temporary or permanent
injunction to enforce the obligations contained in this
Agreement.
I HAVE READ THIS AGREEMENT. I UNDERSTAND IT, HAVE HAD THE
OPPORTUNITY TO OBTAIN INDEPENDENT LEGAL ADVISE IN RESPECT OF IT,
AND I AGREE TO ITS TERMS. I acknowledge having received a fully
executed copy of this Agreement.
Signed, sealed and
delivered
in the presence of:
/s/ James Hutton
___________________________________
Witness
/s/ Randy Buchamer
___________________________________
Employee Signature
James Hutton
___________________________________
(Name of Witness - printed)
Randy Buchamer
__________________________________
(Name of Employee (printed)
December 5, 2001
___________________________________
Date
On Behalf Of:
VOICE MOBILITY INC.
/s/ James Hutton
James Hutton, President
___________________________________
Name (Title)
December 4, 2001
___________________________________
Date
EXHIBIT 10.41
LivingLAB Agreement
Between
VMI and Innovatia
Introduction and Scope
of the Agreement
The purpose of this
document (Agreement) is to present the opportunity for VMI
(Mobility Incorporated) to participate in a
LivingLAB relationship with Innovatia Inc. (Innovatia)
While the Agreement is with Innovatia, a wholly owned subsidiary of
Aliant Inc., the LivingLAB represents the assets of Aliant
Telecom Inc. ("Aliant"). Where reference is made to Aliant
resources, and engagement thereof, it is deemed to be under the
auspices of this agreement and the direction and management of
Innovatia. The intent of this Agreement between VMI and Innovatia
with respect to the LivingLAB is to work together to jointly
innovate and accelerate the launch of new VMI products as well as
the sale of existing products in the global market.
Specifically, this
Agreement is targeted at VMI development of Unified Communications
product and services. VMI has adopted a strategic position as a
legacy replacement company that positions Telco's for Unified
Communications by replacing legacy product and showing positive ROI
in the process. The projects outlined will test this VMI strategy
and transition Aliant customers from our Legacy platforms to the
VMI platform. The project descriptions are contained in Appendix
A.
This project is a joint
development project and shall include the following activities:
i. Sign off and mutual
agreement of deliverables and time schedules by both parties;
ii. Provision of project
managers by both parties whose responsibility it will be to create
the project plan; and
iii. Provision of senior
managers from both parties whose responsibility it will be to plan
and manage the relationship.
The LivingLAB is defined as a package of 5 assets comprising
an innovation environment. Combined these assets represent the
services outlined in this Agreement.
A.OBLIGATIONS OF INNOVATIA
ALL OBLIGATIONS OF INNOVATIA INCLUDED IN THE AGREEMENT SHALL BE
SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ALIANT INC.,
OR SUCH COMMITTEE IT GRANTS THE AUTHORITY TOO. IF SAID APPROVAL IS
NOT GRANTED, THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE DEEMED NULL AND VOID.
1. License of
Aliant Intellectual Property
(a) Aliant is a convergent
carrier, with an integrated network and system perspective and owns
or has licensed certain intellectual property (including software
in source or executable form, confidential information, trade
secrets, business methods or processes or patentable matter, for
example) used in the LivingLAB environment ("Aliant
Intellectual Property"). To the extent there is any such Aliant
Intellectual Property used by VMI, Aliant licenses, on a
non-exclusive, fully-paid, non-transferable basis, such Aliant
Intellectual Property to VMI for use by VMI during the
LivingLAB test to last for the duration of the test, to aid
in the development and verification of current VMI Products.
Without limiting the
foregoing, unless Aliant or Innovatia agree in writing, VMI will
not:
- disassemble, reverse
engineer or decompile the Intellectual Property;
- derivative works from the Intellectual Property;
- the Intellectual Property;
- sublicense or transfer the Intellectual Property;
- or merge any part of the Intellectual Property with any other
Intellectual Property;
- the Intellectual Property to any third party;
- any Intellectual Property to upgrade any product not involved
in the VMI LivingLAB test;
- to discover any trade secrets related to the Intellectual
Property; or
- obscure or alter any notice of copyright, trademark or other
proprietary right marking affixed or included in the Intellectual
Property.
(b) All Aliant
Intellectual Property and any support services are provided
is Neither Aliant nor Innovatia make other warranties
of any kind, whether express, implied, statutory or otherwise.
Notwithstanding, Aliant and Innovatia do warrant that the Aliant
Intellectual Property provided to VMI hereunder does not, or will
not, infringe the intellectual property rights or other rights of
any third party, including without limitation copyright, trademark,
trade secret and patent or other rights. Aliant and Innovatia
expressly exclude any warranties of merchantability or fitness for
a particular purpose. Aliant and Innovatia expressly exclude any
warranties or representations with respect to the adequacy,
accuracy or utility of any information obtained by VMI under this
Agreement.
2. Professional
Services and Project Management
(a) Innovatia will provide technical resources to VMI. The technical
resources at Aliant are experienced in testing, implementing and
integrating new product offerings. These resources will be assigned
to VMI LivingLAB projects to aid in the development and
verification cycles. The LivingLAB will bring together a
multi functional team representing a cross section of divisions of
the company to bring the expertise and knowledge developed in the
areas that VMI is developing products. They will give insight into
the ever-changing requirements of a service provider.
(b) Innovatia will also
provide project management resources to support the technical
resources in the following manner:
- Innovatia will make
available sufficient Aliant resources to carry out VMI
LivingLAB activities as outlined above;
- Innovatia will make
available an Account Manager to ensure the relationship between VMI
and the LivingLAB is strong and mutually beneficial. The
Account Manager is responsible for ensuring a strong commitment to
deliver the services outlined above. The Account Manager will
ensure that VMI gets the highest level of customer service.
- Innovatia will make
available a Project Manager to manage all VMI LivingLAB
projects. The Project Manager will ensure that projects are carried
out in a timely manner. They will ensure that the mandate given to
them for the project by VMI is carried out and the outcomes are
relevant. They will act as VMI single point of contact for
projects.
(d) The Innovatia
provided Account Manager and the Project Manager will together
provide:
- at a minimum, bi-monthly
updates on all VMI LivingLAB projects, these updates will
provide sufficient detail to allow VMI to steer the course of the
project.
- a full report at the end
of all projects. This report typically is made available both as a
bound copy and in an electronic format like a CD Rom. The report is
considered the Intellectual Property of VMI and will not be
disclosed to any third parties by Aliant or Innovatia. The report
may be used internally by Aliant, Innovatia or other wholly owned
subsidiaries of Aliant Inc. except in cases where the subject
matter is deemed by VMI too sensitive to be distributed beyond the
immediate project team and provided that Innovatia has received VMI
prior written consent to the disclosure of the report beyond the
immediate project team.
- a quarterly summary on
all activities (projects, visits, and other pertinent information)
undertaken by the LivingLAB on behalf of VMI.
(e) Product Management at Innovatia will share their service
provider’s business vision. For example, business case
analysis, pricing strategies, functional evolution of the product,
advertising models, deployment strategies, competitive strategies,
regulatory strategies, operational considerations and market
learnings. The experience gained at Innovatia in delivering the
individual solutions will be used to build the business case for
VMI integrated solution.
3. Sales and Marketing
(a) Innovatia has a trusted
and privileged relationship with their customers. The
LivingLAB research group will facilitate innovation by
leveraging this customer relationship. Subject to privacy and other
legal and regulatory requirements, VMI will have access to all
consumer research undertaken by Aliant. The research group will
undertake additional VMI directed consumer research. If the use of
an outside research company is necessary VMI will pre-approve and
pay for the project. Innovatia will obtain VMI prior written
approval of the use of the outside research company who will sign a
Non-disclosure Agreement acceptable to VMI. Should the research be
of mutual interest, Innovatia and VMI will negotiate a cost-sharing
model assessed on a project-by-project basis.
(b) Innovatia will use the
LivingLAB innovations environment to assist in the marketing
and sales of VMI Products.
(c) Subject to s. 5 (e)
(i), Innovatia will arrange and supervise customer and prospective
customer visits, within reason and availability, to the
LivingLAB where such parties can see first-hand
Aliant’s implementation of VMI products
(d) Subject to s. 5 (e) (i), Innovatia will detail the testing and
development work done by VMI in the LivingLAB to potential
customers. Innovatia will provide sufficient detail about the
products to validate the solutions developed by VMI.
(e) Subject to s. 5 (e)
(i), Innovatia agrees to give VMI customers and prospects access
during these visits to key Innovatia resources that can detail the
application of VMI products. The resources will also share elements
of Aliant’s Intellectual Property in the form of the
strategic plans for new and existing Aliant services. The resources
called upon to present during the visits are at Innovatia’s
discretion and may vary.
- The visits detailed
above may include a tour of the Aliant Labs, including the
VideoActive Development Centre, a state of the art
demonstration facility.
- The VideoActive Development Centre may be used to
demonstrate VMI Products. The facility hosts over 300 tours a year
many of which represent potential customers for VMI.
(f) Innovatia will provide sales leads to VMI as they are identified
and proactively involve VMI in other partner’s customer
visits to the LivingLAB.
4. Operations Administration and Maintenance ("OAM")
(a) VMI will have access to Aliant OAM standards and processes prior
to and during the development and verification cycles of their
products. Elements of OAM include all the elements necessary to run
successful services including: maintenance, provisioning, billing,
for example.
5. Quality Assurance process
(a) Innovatia will use the LivingLAB to aid in product
development and verification. The lab environments are not
simulated; they duplicate the production environment. This unique
environment will allow VMI to test new products in a real world
environment ensuring they are delivering a high quality product.
(b) Innovatia has developed a testing methodology that can
be used by VMI to test their products. Such methodology is
incorporated in the LivingLAB and represents an integrated
approach to testing where all elements of a service are
incorporated. One of the advantages is that VMI will have a
separate and distinct group of resources evaluating their product.
Being removed from the development of the product allows for an
impartial assessment.
6. Innovatia and Aliant Warranties
(a) Innovatia and Aliant will perform their services under
this Agreement in a diligent manner, in accordance with generally
accepted professional and industry standards.
(b) Innovatia and Aliant warrant that the performance of their
obligations under this Agreement will not contravene any agreements
they may have with third parties.
B. OBLIGATIONS OF VMI
7. Payments
(a) VMI will pay Innovatia in cash a
royalty of 10% on the gross revenue of VMI between Jan 1st 2002 and ending Dec 31st 2003. VMI will pay the
royalty payment in cash within 30 days after the end of each
calendar quarter. The royalty will be on gross revenue received for
sale of the VMI products globally within that quarter. If the
contract is terminated as per paragraph (O) the royalty payments
will continue for 6 months after the termination date.
(b) VMI shall reimburse Innovatia for any and all expenses
incurred by Innovatia relative to VMI customer visits to the
LivingLAB, not paid for by the customers themselves for
visits initiated by VMI. VMI Customer visits will be agreed to
between the parties from time to time, in writing and prior to the
visits. This Agreement will cover 4 free visits by VMI customers
over the period of this Agreement.
8. Professional Services and Project Management
(a) VMI shall assign 1 senior manager to the VMI LivingLAB
relationship. They will be responsible for the following areas of
the business relationship:
- Managing the
strategic direction of the relationship
- project opportunities
- in a quarterly status meeting (via conference call) with the
Innovatia Account Manager to review new opportunities and discuss
appropriate action items.
- in quarterly strategy reviews. These reviews will set the agenda
for the upcoming quarter, address new opportunities and serve as an
interface between VMI and the LivingLAB management team.
These meetings will have a broad scope and include the General
Manager of the LivingLAB as well as any other senior
resources from both companies as necessary.
(b) VMI shall
also assign 1 senior manager to the VMI Product project. They will
be responsible for all aspects of the relationship between VMI and
Living Lab as it pertains to the VMI Product project
including, but not limited to:
- The overall
management and control of the project and attributed
deliverables,
- Review and sign
off of Innovatia invoices pertaining to Living Lab
activities,
- and prioritization of activities and projects performed by
Living Lab, as they pertain to the VMI Product project,
- and management of the Product Requirements Document and the
Project Plan,
- in a quarterly status meeting (via conference call) with the
Innovatia Account Manager to review new opportunities and discuss
appropriate action items.
- in quarterly strategy reviews. These reviews will set the agenda
for the upcoming quarter, address new opportunities and serve as an
interface between VMI and the LivingLAB management team.
These meetings will have a broad scope and include the General
Manager of the LivingLAB as well as any other senior
resources from both companies as necessary.
(c) VMI shall
provide, at no cost to Aliant or Innovatia, and at VMI discretion,
any products necessary to carry out VMI LivingLAB
projects.
(d) License
Grant: Certain of the items of the VMI Product may contain or be
accompanied by software (Software) and except as otherwise
expressly provided in this Agreement, all references to the VMI
Product will include the accompanying Software. Innovatia is
granted a non-exclusive, non-transferable, temporary license to use
the Software for the duration of the projects specified in the
Statement of Work. All rights not specifically granted to Innovatia
are reserved for VMI.
Without
limiting the foregoing, Innovatia will not:
disassemble,
reverse engineer or decompile the Software ;
- derivative works from the Software ;
- the Software (except that Innovatia may make one copy for
archival purposes);
- sublicense or transfer the Software;
- or merge any part of the Software with any other software;
- the Software to any third party;
- any Software to upgrade any product not manufactured or sold by
VMI;
- to discover any trade secrets related to the Software or the
VMI Product ; or
- obscure or alter any notice of copyright, trademark or other
proprietary right marking affixed or included in the VMI
Product.
(e) The VMI
Products and any support services are provided is VMI
makes no other warranties of any kind, whether express, implied,
statutory or otherwise. Notwithstanding, VMI does warrant that the
VMI Product provided to Innovatia and Aliant hereunder does not, or
will not, infringe the intellectual property rights or other rights
of any third party, including without limitation copyright,
trademark, trade secret and patent or other rights. VMI expressly
excludes any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a
particular purpose. VMI expressly excludes any warranties or
representations with respect to the adequacy, accuracy or utility
of any information obtained by Innovatia or Aliant under this
Agreement.
C.
MISCELLANEOUS
(a) Ownership - VMI has exclusive
right, title and interest to the VMI Product. Innovatia will not
(a) acquire any interest in the VMI Product, (b) misrepresent the
true ownership of the VMI Product to any party or (c) in any way
encumber or use any portion the VMI Product as collateral for any
debt. VMI has exclusive right, title and interest to all of the
findings including but not limited to reports of difficulty, all
required reports and any recommendations.
(b) Limitation of Liability -
EXCEPT AS REQUIRED PURSUANT TO THE EXPRESS PROVISIONS OF SECTION C.
(d) and (g) OF THIS AGREEMENT,IN NO EVENT SHALL EITHER PARTY (OR
THEIR DIRECTORS, OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES, DISTRIBUTORS, SUPPLIERS,
AGENTS, REPRESENTATIVES OR SUBLICENSEES) BE LIABLE TO EACH OTHER OR
TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITH RESPECT TO ANY SUBJECT MATTER OF THIS
AGREEMENT UNDER ANY CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE, STRICT LIABILITY OR OTHER
LEGAL OR EQUITABLE THEORY, FOR ANY LOSS OF PROFITS, LOSS OF
BUSINESS, OR FOR INDIRECT, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL
DAMAGES, OF ANY KIND, EVEN IF EITHER HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE
POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES (AND NOTWITHSTANDING ANY FAILURE OF
ESSENTIAL PURPOSE OF LIMITED REMEDY).
Total liability of either party for
all claims of any kind for any loss or damage will not exceed the
value of the VMI Product being tested which gave rise to the claim.
Neither party will be liable for any losses or damages arising from
any failure of the VMI Products or Intellectual Property during the
projects. No action or proceeding against either party may be
commenced more than one year after the event-giving rise to the
claim.
(c) Press releases - The
parties will mutually agree on and engage in joint public relations
activities. However, no communications shall be released to the
press, nor shall any test results, advertisements, publicity or
promotional material be issued, with regard to this Agreement
without mutual consent.
(d) Confidential Information
- Although both parties shall have care
and control of the project undertaken under this Agreement
Innovatia reserves its rights to screen any projects undertaken by
third parties at the LivingLAB to ensure there is no
conflict of interest or breach of confidentiality with other
LivingLAB third party projects. Should there be any
conflict or potential of conflict appropriate steps will be taken
to isolate the VMI Product project from other third party
projects.
- For the purpose of this Agreement,
Information means all oral, written or machine-readable
data and information that is not generally known to competitors of
either party and is proprietary and/or confidential to either party
and its affiliates, which includes, but is not limited to, business
and marketing plans, financial information, current and future
services and products, sales and customer information (including
personal information of customers and potential customers,
consisting of any information relating to an identifiable
individual), research and development, general business operations,
and trade secrets. Confidential Information shall not include
information of either party and/or its affiliates that:
- is or becomes part of the public
domain through no wrongful act of the other party;
- is disclosed with the written consent
and authorization of the party whose confidential information it
is;
- is independently developed by the
other party;
- is received without obligation of
confidence from a third party for whom there was no reason to
believe was not lawfully in possession of such information, free of
any obligation of confidence; or is lawfully required to be
disclosed by a court of competent jurisdiction, provided that,
before making such disclosure, the disclosing party shall promptly
provide the party who owns the Confidential Information written
notice of the requirement to disclose, and shall reasonably
cooperate with the party who owns the Confidential Information in
its actions to secure the confidential treatment of the
Confidential Information.
- Both parties at all times shall:
- treat the Confidential Information as
strictly confidential, and shall not disclose or permit the
disclosure of the Confidential Information to any person,
corporation or organization whatsoever without first obtaining
written permission from the other party;
- take all reasonable precautions
against the Confidential Information being used or acquired by any
unauthorized person or persons, which precautions shall entail the
same degree of care as they use in preserving the confidentiality
of its own confidential information;
- promptly return to the other party
upon request, or provide confirmation of destruction of, all copies
of the Confidential Information, all Confidential Information
contained in any retrieval system or database, and any and all
tangible material relating to the Confidential Information,
including, but not limited to, all copies, notes, computer disks,
tapes and compact disks, whether such material was made or compiled
by them or furnished by the other party; and
- not copy, reproduce in any form, or
store in a retrieval system or database, the Confidential
Information without the prior written consent of the Disclosing
Party, except for such copies and storage as may be reasonably
required internally by the Disclosing Party for the purpose of this
Agreement.
- In the event of a breach, or a
threatened breach, of any of the provisions of this section c, both
parties acknowledges and agrees that the harm suffered by the other
party would not be compensated by monetary damages alone and,
accordingly, the other party, in addition to other available legal
or equitable remedies, shall be entitled to an injunction against
such breach or threatened breach.
(e) Intellectual Property -
Innovatia/Aliant agrees that it has no intellectual property rights
in or to any VMI developments or the VMI Product created prior to
or during the term of this Agreement by VMI. VMI agrees that it has
no intellectual property rights in and or to Innovatia/Aliant
developments or Intellectual Property created prior to or during
the term of this Agreement by Innovatia/Aliant. The parties
acknowledge that no activity likely to give rise to the joint
creation of intellectual property will be engaged in unless and
until the parties enter into an agreement setting forth the rights
and obligations of the parties with respect to such intellectual
property.
(f) Rights to resell -
Innovatia/Aliant shall have full rights to sell its services,
applications and intellectual property to any of its and VMI
customers without any finder fees or sales fees being charged by
VMI. VMI shall have full rights to sell its services, applications
and intellectual property to any of its and
Innovatia/Aliant’s customers without any finder fees or sales
fees being charged by Innovatia/Aliant.
(g) Indemnity - Both Parties
agree to defend, indemnify and save harmless the other Party from
any and all claims and liabilities made by third parties for actual
or alleged infringement of any Canadian or United States of America
patent, copyright or other property rights based on any software,
program, service and/or other materials furnished by that Party
pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, provided that the party
seeking the indemnification (the Party(i) notifies the
other promptly of the receipt of any claim for which it will seek
indemnification, (ii) gives the other party exclusive authority to
settle the claim (iii) assists the other party and provides all
relevant information in its possession and (iv) has not, nor has
anyone acting on its behalf compromised the defence of such suit in
any way. This article states the entire obligation of the parties
for patent, trade secret or copyright infringement.
VMI obligations under this Section C (g) will not apply to (i) any
infringement or violation of Intellectual Property Rights caused by
modification of the VMI Product, or any component thereof by any
person or entity other than VMI, its employees or agents acting on
VMI behalf or at its direction, in connection with this Agreement
or (ii) any infringement caused directly by any such person's or
entity’s use and maintenance of the VMI Product, or any
component thereof other than in accordance with the purposes
contemplated by this Agreement, except as expressly authorized in
writing by VMI. VMI’s obligations under this Section C (g)
will not extend to alleged infringements or violations that arise
because the VMI Product, the Software, or any component thereof
provided by VMI are used in combination with other products or
software furnished by third parties, if such combination is what
caused the infringement, and where any such combination was not
installed, recommended or approved, expressly in writing by
VMI.
Aliant and Innovatia 's obligations under this Section C (g) will
not apply to (i) any infringement or violation of Intellectual
Property Rights caused by modification of the Aliant and Innovatia
Intellectual Property, or any component thereof by any person or
entity other than Aliant and Innovatia , their employees or agents
acting on Aliant and Innovatia 's behalf or at their direction, in
connection with this Agreement or (ii) any infringement caused
directly by any such person's or entity’s use and maintenance
of the Aliant and Innovatia Intellectual Property, or any component
thereof other than in accordance with the purposes contemplated by
this Agreement, except as expressly authorized in writing by Aliant
and Innovatia . Aliant and Innovatia’s obligations under this
Section C (g) will not extend to alleged infringements or
violations that arise because the Aliant and Innovatia Intellectual
Property, or any component thereof provided by Aliant and Innovatia
are used in combination with other products or software furnished
by third parties, if such combination is what caused the
infringement, and where any such combination was not installed,
recommended or approved, expressly in writing by Aliant and
Innovatia .
(h) Waiver - No term or
condition may be waived by either party without the express written
consent of the other, and forbearance or indulgence by a party in
any regard whatsoever shall not constitute the party’s
waiver. No consent or waiver shall be effective unless made in
writing by an authorized officer of the party.
(i) Severance - Should any provision of this Agreement be
unenforceable at law, it shall be considered separate and severable
from the remaining provisions of this Agreement, which shall
continue in force and shall be binding as though the said provision
had not been included.
(j) Interpretation In this Agreement, words importing
the singular include the plural and vice versa, and words importing
gender include all genders and firms or corporations where
applicable.
(k) Assignment - This
Agreement shall not be assigned, in whole or in part, without the
express written consent of both Parties. This Agreement shall be
binding upon and shall enure to the benefit of the parties hereto
and their respective successors and permitted assigns.
(l) Governing Law - This
Agreement shall be interpreted and governed by the laws of the
Province of Nova Scotia and the laws of Canada applicable
therein.
(m) Headings - The headings
inserted in this Agreement are for convenience of reference only
and, in no way, define, limit or enlarge the scope or meaning of
any of the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement.
(n) Entire Agreement - This Agreement and any documents
incorporated by reference, shall constitute the entire Agreement
between the parties with respect to subject matter hereof, and
shall replace all prior written or verbal promises and
representations. This Agreement and everything contained therein
shall enure to the benefit of and be binding upon each of the
parties hereto and their respective successors and permitted
assigns.
(o) Termination Either party may terminate this
Agreement on Sixty (60) business days notice, without cause. In the
event of a breach of section 8 (e), either party may terminate this
Agreement immediately. In the event of a material breach of section
C (d), the non-breaching party may terminate this Agreement
immediately. In the event of a material breach of this Agreement or
Section C (d), the non-breaching party may terminate this Agreement
without further notice provided that it (i) has given the breaching
party written notice of the breach, (ii) the written notice clearly
describes the nature of the breach and (iii) the breaching party
has failed to cure the breach within ten (10) days of the
notice.
Upon termination Innovatia will (a)
return the VMI Product to VMI in the same condition as it was
received but for reasonable wear and tear, (b) permit VMI entrance
to the Test location, if applicable, in order for VMI to remove the
VMI Product; and (c) deliver any outstanding project reports.
Upon termination VMI will disconnect and remove the VMI Product and
will not, in any event, be responsible for any damage or alteration
caused to any project location by the original installation or
subsequent removal of the VMI Product. Upon Termination, VMI will
be responsible for the Fees, and all costs incurred by Innovatia
that are to be reimbursed by VMI, as referenced in section 7.
(p) Notices - All notices under
this Agreement will be in writing and may be sent by electronic
copy or facsimile provided that a hard copy is also mailed to the
attention of the legal department of the applicable party at the
addresses listed below. Any such notice will be effective: on the
first business day after delivery, if sent by electronic means or
by facsimile; seven days from the date of mailing if sent by mail;
or on the next business day, if sent by courier.
If to VMI:
Voice Mobility Inc.
Suite 180-13777 Commerce parkway
Richmond, B.C.
Canada
V6V 2X3
Attention: James Hewett, CFO
Fax: 604.233.4826
If to Innovatia:
Innovatia Inc.
One Brunswick Square,
P.O. Box 6081
Saint John, NB, Canada
E2L 4R5
Attention: Norm Jacquard
Fax: 902 484
3500
(q) Force majeure - Neither Party is responsible for a
failure to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement or for
delay in doing so if such failure or delay is due to circumstances
beyond its control including but not limited to acts of God, acts
of government, war, riots, strikes, accidents in transportation .
The parties agree to immediately provide notice of any such
circumstances and undertake to restore the status quo as soon as is
feasible
(r) Interpretation - No provision of this Agreement will be
interpreted against any party merely because that party or its
legal representative drafted the provision.
(s) Relationship The relationship between the parties
is that of independent contractors and does not create any right or
authority to act on behalf of the other party
(t) CounterpartsThis Agreement may be executed in any number of
counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original, but all of
which together will constitute one and the same instrument. Each
party will receive a duplicate original of the counterpart copy or
copies executed by it. A signed facsimile or telefaxed copy of this
Agreement or any agreement, document or instrument contemplated
hereby shall be effectual and valid proof of execution and
delivery. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the parties will each
deliver original execution copies of the Agreement to one another
as soon as practicable following execution thereof.
NOTE: THIS AGREEMENT IS MADE SUBJECT TO ALIANT REQUIRED BOARD
APPROVAL.
This Agreement shall commence on
January 1, 2002 and will be reviewed annually to set the scope and
size of the Agreement for the upcoming year.
Signed as a LivingLAB Agreement dated the day of February,
2002.
VOICE MOBILITY INC. | By: /s/ James Hewett
Title: Chief Financial Officer
|
INNOVATIA INC. | By: /s/Norm Jacquard
Title: Business Leader, Unified Communications
|
EXHIBIT 10.42
Addendum to LivingLAB Agreement
This
addendum provides wording which directly replaces and supercedes
Section B. (of VMI) subsection (a.) of the Living Lab
Agreement between Voice Mobility Inc. and Innovatia Inc., dated
February 27th, 2001.
B. OBLIGATIONS OF VMI
- In consideration of
the services provided by Innovatia relative to LivingLAB, both with
regard to activities outlined in this document and other activities
to be defined, VMI will pay to Innovatia fees based directly on the
value of the work performed by Innovatia, ("the Fees"). The initial
term of this agreement will be three years beginning Feb 1st 2001,
however this term may be extended by mutual consent. The value of
this Agreement in Year 1 will be US$1.74 Million, and will be
settled in the form of a promissory note (to be attached as
Appendix A to this Addendum), in a form to be agreed to by
Innovatia, no later than Dec 14th, 2001 (Terms attached as Appendix
B to this Addendum)
The
scope of services, and payments therefore, for Years 2 and 3 of the
Agreement will be negotiated and established by January 31, 2002.
It is understood by both parties that the guiding principles for
this negotiation will include:
- All projects defined by LivingLAB and VMI will be pursuant
to a specific scope of work and agreed value for same;
- Any future payments by VMI
to Innovatia for work performed by LivingLAB will take the form of
equity or a royalty stream, which will not exceed 10% of VMI gross
revenue in any given year notwithstanding, VMI will be responsible
to pay anything they agree to in scope of work under (i);
- Services will be provided to VMI by Innovatia will be at the
customer rate applicable
- If a revised LivingLAB agreement is not negotiated and signed by
both Innovatia and VMI by Jan 31, 2002, all LivingLAB activities
and associated work relative to those activities that Aliant is
performing on behalf of LivingLAB will terminate.
- VMI and Innovatia agree and acknowledge that should the January
2002 negotiations for new terms of the LivingLAB arrangement
between the parties, as described in the Addendum, not result in a
continuing LivingLAB Agreement by February 15, 2002, this note
shall become immediately due, and payable in cash or shares at VMI
‘s option on or before July1, 2002, until such time as the
parties negotiate revised payment terms in good faith.
At the end of each 12-month period beginning Feb
1st, 2001, VMI and Innovatia assigned account and senior managers
will review progress on projects and invoiced amounts. Changes to
existing projects and payment schedule may be made by mutual
consent.
VOICE MOBILITY INC. | INNOVATIA INC. |
Per:/s/ James Hewett | Per:/s/Norm Jacquard |
Authorized Signatory | Authorized Signatory |
Appendix A Promissory Note
SCHEDULE A
PROMISSORY NOTE
All words and
phrases with initial capital letters used but not defined herein
have the meanings given to them in the Living Lab Agreement (the
Agreement between Voice Mobility Inc. (VMI) and Innovatia
Inc. (Innovatia) dated February 27, 2001, as amended by Addendum 2
dated December 14, 2001 (Addendum)
FOR VALUE RECEIVED, subject to all the terms herein and
pursuant to the Agreement and Addendum 2, VMI hereby promises to
pay to Innovatia at its head office an aggregate amount, in cash or
in common shares of Voice Mobility International, Inc. ("VMII"),
Cdn$2,720,142 (the Amount) as follows:
1. VMI and
Innovatia agree and acknowledge that should the January 2002
negotiations for new terms of the LivingLAB arrangement between the
parties, as described in the Addendum, not result in a continuing
LivingLAB Agreement by February 15, 2002, this note shall become
immediately due, and payable in cash or shares at VMI ‘s
option on or before July1, 2002, until such time as the parties
negotiate revised payment terms in good faith.
2. On or before
the first business day of each period of three calendar months
(each of such periods being referred to herein as a Quarter) VMI
will, commencing on July2002 and for the 10 consecutive Quarters
thereafter, either (at VMI's sole option) pay in cash or deliver to
Innovatia shares of VMII (the "VMII Shares") that are subject to a
4 month hold period in BC and Ontario, a one year hold period in
the US, and such other hold periods as may apply at law (and
legended accordingly), or a combination therefore, having an Equity
Value equal to the lesser of:
- Cdn$226,678;
or
- of the net aggregate amount of invoices issued by VMI to Aliant
Telecom for all products (the "Revenues") in respect of the
particular Quarter.
- In the event
that the Revenues for a Quarter exceed Cdn.$226,678, VMI will carry
forward the difference between the Revenues and Cdn.$226,678 and
include that amount in the calculation of Revenues for the
following Quarter.
- Payment for
the period between Jan 1, 2002 and June 30, 2002 will be payable in
the third quarter beginning July 1, 2002. The determination of the
amount owed will be the lesser of $453,356 or 40% of the net
aggregate amount of invoices issued by VMI to Aliant Telecom for
all products (the "Revenues") in respect in the period between Jan
1, 2002 and June 30, 2002 .
3. Subject to
VMI first obtaining the approval from the Toronto Stock Exchange
(the TSE) to do so, on or before December 28, 2001, VMI will
deliver to Innovatia 500,000 common shares of VMII (the VMII
Shares") with such Initial VMII Shares being subject to a 4 month
hold period in BC and Ontario, a one year hold period in the US,
and such other hold periods as may apply at law (and legended
accordingly).
4. The Principal
Amount will bear simple interest at the rate of 1% above the Prime
Rate as published by the HSBC Bank Canada on the last working day
of the month. The Principal Amount will be reduced from time to
time by the amount of all payments of cash or delivery of VMII
Shares valued at the Equity Value thereof as of the time such
Equity Value is determined.
5. part of the Principal Amount or interest accrued thereon not paid
after the last payment provided for in paragraph 1 hereof will be
paid by VMI in successive Quarters thereafter, in amounts not
exceeding the minimum amount referred to in paragraph 1, by the
issuance of common shares of VMII in an amount equal to the unpaid
amount divided by Cdn$1.56.
6. acknowledges that, other than with respect to the Initial VMII
Shares, before VMI can deliver VMII Shares as provided for herein
VMII is required by securities law and the TSE to obtain the
approval by formal resolution of the majority of its minority
shareholders (which will exclude Innovatia and any of its
associates from voting as shareholders of VMII) at a meeting of
shareholders of VMII and that this will not occur prior to VMII's
next annual meeting. Further, the issuance of any VMII Shares is
subject to the prior approval of the TSE. In the event such
shareholder and TSE approval is not obtained, this Promissory Note
will be payable only in cash.
7. will be entitled at any time and from time to time to prepay the
whole or any portion of the then remaining Principal Amount and
interest accrued thereon without penalty by one or payments in cash
or deliveries of VMII Shares valued at its Equity Value.
8. secure its obligations hereunder, VMI hereby grants to Innovatia
a security interest in all amounts due from time to time to VMI
from Aliant provided that as long as VMI is not in default of any
of its obligations under this note Innovatia will have no claim or
right to such amounts.
9. the purposes of this note, Valuemeans the value of
any VMII Shares delivered to Innovatia hereunder determined: (a) as
to 500,000 of the VMII Shares at: (i) the lesser of the market
price of the common shares of VMII on the TSE; and (ii) Cdn$0.75
per VMII Share; and (b) the balance of the VMII Shares on the basis
of the weighted average trading price for VMII's common shares on
the TSE over the 10 trading days immediately prior to the date on
which such VMII Shares are to be issued, or on such other basis as
may be prescribed by the TSE for transactions of this type.
10. note shall be governed by the laws of the Province of British
Columbia and the federal laws of Canada applicable therein.
IN WITNESS
WHEREPOF VMI has executed this note by its duly authorized
officers as of December 28, 2001.
|
VOICE MOBILITY INC. | INNOVATIA INC. |
Per:/s/James Hewett | Per:/s/Norm Jacquard |
Authorized Signatory | Authorized Signatory |
EXHIBIT 10.43
Employee EMPLOYMENT
CONTRACT
This Agreement made and effective April 1, 2000
Between:
VOICE MOBILITY INC.
With offices at:
180 - 13777 Commerce Court
Richmond, BC V6V 2X3
(the
Company)
And:
James Hutton
6442 180th Street
Surrey, BC
V3S 7K2
(hereafter
referred to as the Executive)
Whereas:
A. The
Company is in the business of communications including the research
and development of new technology, and the production, marketing
and sales of equipment, software and services related thereto;
B. The Executive possesses certain qualifications which may
be of benefit to the Company;
C. The Company is desirous of employing the Executive, who
is desirous of working for the Company in the development of its
business and its related interests;
Now Therefore, in consideration of the premises and of the
mutual covenants, conditions and terms herein, the parties hereto
agree as follows:
1.0 Definitions
1.01 In this Agreement, the following words and phrases have the
following meanings:
- Opportunitiesmeans all potential business
opportunities of any kind whatsoever in connection with the
business of the Company including any acquisitions, sales, business
arrangements, consulting engagements, contracts or retainers and
other transactions or opportunities for new markets, products or
services which have been disclosed to or investigated, studied or
considered by the Company or by others on behalf of the Company or
which come to the attention of the Executive as a result of his
engagement with the Company.
- Informationmeans information pertaining to the
Company’s customers and clients, client base and markets
including without limitation:
- any
information the Company has regarding the business of its current
and prospective clients;
- names, addresses and telephone numbers of the current and
prospective clients of the Company;
- the names,
addresses and telephone numbers of any employees of clients of the
Company with whom the Executive has been or will be in contact in
the course of his engagement with the Company; and
- the
Company’s contracts with its clients including details as to
pricing and supply.
- Informationmeans information known to or used
by the Company in connection with the business of the Company
including but not limited to:
- any
innovative and proprietary means of testing and related products
that have been developed by or for the Company including any
software for the application thereof; and
- Documents,
Financial Information, Marketing Information, Intellectual
Property, Business Opportunities or Research and Development, but
not including any of the foregoing which was known to the Executive
prior to engagement by the Company or which is or becomes a matter
of Public Knowledge.
- any
improvements, formula, design, prototype, compilation of
information, data, program, code, method, technique or process,
information relating to any product, device, equipment or machine,
information pertaining to the Company.
- Documentsmeans any documents, compiled or uncompiled
computer programs (in electronic or other form), specifications,
plans, drawings, prototypes, models, manuals, materials, sketches,
schematics, compilations of information, analyses, experiments,
data, formulae or other information pertaining or relating to the
Client Information or the Confidential Information including copies
or reproductions (in any form) of the foregoing.
- Informationmeans any information pertaining to the
Company’s fees, costs, sales, income, profit, profitability,
pricing, salaries and wages.
- Propertymeans any and all any trade secrets,
Documents, techniques, processes, information relating to any
product, service, device, equipment or machine, inventions,
designs, ideas, works, creations, developments, methods of doing
business, processes, techniques, prototypes, patent or patent
applications, tradeor tradeapplications, industrial design or
copyright of the Company and includes any modifications or
improvements thereto.
- Informationmeans information related to the
Company’s marketing programs, plans, strategies and proposed
future products, services, advertising and promotions.
- Knowledgemeans information that is generally known to
actuaries or is otherwise easily accessible through lawful,
non-confidential sources.
- and Developmentmeans information pertaining to any
research, development, investigation, study, analysis, experiment
or test carried on or proposed to be carried on at any time by the
Company in connection with the business of the Company.
2.0 Employment
2.01 The Company agrees to hire the Executive who agrees to
perform services for the Company or any of its affiliates, upon the
terms set forth herein.
3.0 Term
3.01 This agreement shall be from the April 1, 2000 until December
31, 2002, but may be terminated in accordance with the terms
herein.
4.0 Types of Services
4.01 The nature and types of services to be provided to the
Company by the Executive are set forth in Schedule
Ahereto. It is understood and agreed that the duties and
responsibilities so defined are not exhaustive and may be altered
from time to time by the Company; So long as any such changes are
reasonable, both with respect to any changing circumstances of the
Company and its business and the personal background, training and
circumstances of the Executive, the Executive shall not refuse any
such changed employment request by the Company.
5.0 Location
5.01 Services provided by the Executive shall be
primarily performed at the offices of the Company located in
Richmond, it being understood that some travel may be required of
the Executive from time to time as determined by the Company. The
Company also reserves the right to transfer the Executive to a
different location, upon reasonable notice to the Executive.
6.0 Hours
6.01 Except as otherwise specified herein, the Executive shall
be expected to work those periods and times normally constituting
open or operating times for the Company and its business, however
the Executive will be expected to work such additional time or
times as may be appropriate with respect to the business
requirements and commitments at the time, without claim for
overtime or additional remuneration.
6.02 The Executive shall be a liberty to devote reasonable time for
serving, as appropriate, on the Boards of Directors of other
corporations, from engaging in charitable and public service
activities, and from managing his personal investments, provided
such activities do not materially interfere with the performance of
his duties and responsibilities under this Agreement and do not
constitute a conflict of interest with respect to his employment
herein.
7.0 Remuneration
7.01 The Company shall provide remuneration to the
Executive in the kind, amounts and at such time or times as more
particularly set out in Schedule Ahereto.
8.0 Holidays
8.01 In addition to statutory holidays, the Executive is
entitled to the number of weeks ordinary, non-cumulative vacation
in each calendar year of employment as is more particularly set out
in Schedule A hereto. This vacation time accrues after 12
months of employment and is subject to the reasonable control of
the Company with respect to scheduling, having consideration for
both other employees of the Company and the commitments of the
Company from time to time in relation to its business.
8.02 In the event that the Executive leaves the Company, for any
reason whatsoever, after having taken unearned vacation, it is
agreed that the Company may deduct that unearned portion from any
final pay owing to the Executive.
9.0 Company’s Commitments
9.01 Company agrees to pay the remuneration stipulated in accordance
with the terms of this agreement.
9.02 Company shall make and remit all required statutory deductions
in relation to the salary of the Executive.
9.03 Company shall reimburse the Executive for all reasonable
traveling and expenses related thereto incurred by the Executive
while engaged in services for the Company at other than the
customary site at which the Executive works.
10.0 Executive’s Commitments:
10.01 The Executive agrees to provide the services required by
the Company from time to time, in a competent and timely
manner.
10.02 The Executive shall devote such time as is required for such
services.
10.03 In consideration of receiving a car allowance, as set out in
Schedule A, the Executive shall provide his own vehicle, with
appropriate insurance, for all local and reasonable travel
requirements.
10.04 The Executive shall at all times herein conduct himself in
competent and courteous manner and will endeavor to foster and
maintain good relations with other Company staff, suppliers,
contractors, and customers of the Company.
11.0 Non-Disclosure
11.01 The Executive recognize that, in the course of and as a
result of this agreement, he shall or may directly or indirectly
obtain Confidential Information and, as a result, the Executive
agrees to respect and adhere to the covenants contained in sections
11.02 to 11.03 hereof.
11.02 The Executive covenants that at all times during the term of
this Agreement and at all times following the termination of this
agreement with the Company for any reason, he shall:
- hold in
confidence and keep confidential all Confidential Information;
- directly or indirectly use any Confidential Information except in
the course of performing the obligations of this agreement; and
- directly or indirectly disclose any Confidential Information to
any person or entity, except in the course of performing the
obligations of this agreement with the Company with the knowledge
and consent of the Company and in the Company's interests.
11.03 The
Executive hereby acknowledges that irreparable damage may result to
the Company, its business or property in the event of the breach of
any of the covenants and assurances herein agreed to by the
Executive and that the present agreement was made by the Company
and continues primarily upon the Executive’s covenants and
assurances herein, and the Executive hereby covenants that in the
event of such breach or danger thereof, the Company shall be
entitled, in addition to any other remedies and damages available,
to an interlocutory or permanent injunction whereby the Executive
shall be ordered to respect the covenants and assurances contained
in this Agreement.
12.0 Executive Disclosure
12.01 The Executive agrees to promptly disclose to the Company
or its nominee complete information in respect to all Business
Opportunities, ideas, discoveries, inventions, improvements,
developments, designs, and technical data, whether patentable or
not (all of which are herein referred to as the "Improvements"),
which are conceived, made, produced or developed by the Executive
alone or with others, resulting as a consequence of the
Executive’s employment or other association with the Company
and relating to the subject matter of the Confidential Information.
The Executive shall at the Company's request promptly assign his
rights in the Improvements to the Company.
13.0 Copying Confidential Information
13.01 The Executive will not make copies of any specifications,
plans, drawings, prototypes, models, documents, computer programs,
manuals, materials or other information appertaining or relating to
the Confidential Information.
14.0 Return of Documents
14.01 Upon termination of the Executive’s engagement with
the Employer for any reason whatsoever, the Executive shall
promptly deliver to the Employer all Documents and confirm to the
Employer that he retains no Documents or any copies or
reproductions thereof.
15.0 Ownership Of Intellectual Property
15.01 Any and all Intellectual Property made or created by the
Executive during the course of the Executive' s employment by the
Company, whether at the Company's place of business or otherwise,
shall be and remain the exclusive property of the Company and the
Executive shall have no right, title or interest therein even
though the Executive may have created or contributed to the
creation of any of the Intellectual Property; and the Company shall
have the sole and exclusive right, title and interest in and to the
Intellectual Property, which right shall continue notwithstanding
the termination of employment of the Executive.
15.02 The Executive shall maintain at all times adequate and current
records relating to the creation and development of any
Improvements, which records shall be and shall remain the property
of the Company.
16.0 Assignment
16.01 The Executive hereby assigns to the Company any and all
right, title and interest that the Executive may have in and to the
Intellectual Property and in any patent, copyright, industrial
design, trade mark and any other similar right pertaining to the
Intellectual Property which the Executive may have by virtue of
having created, made, conceived or contributed to any such
Intellectual Property, either solely or with others, in whole or in
part, in the course of employment and while concerned with or
involved in the business carried on by the Company. The Executive
further agrees to maintain at all times adequate and current
records relating to the creation and development of the
Intellectual Property, which records shall be and shall remain the
property of the Company.
17.0 Intellectual Property Protection
17.01 The Company alone shall have the right to apply for
prosecute and obtain patents and copyright, industrial design and
trade mark registrations and any other registrations or grants or
rights analogous thereto in any and all countries throughout the
world in respect of Intellectual Property made or created by the
Executive during the course of the Executive's employment by the
Company and the Executive agrees to execute on demand, whether
during or subsequent to Executive's employment, any applications
transfers, assignments and other documents as the Company may
consider necessary or desirable from time to time for the purpose
of obtaining, maintaining or vesting in or assigning to the Company
absolute title to any such patents, copyright, industrial design or
trade mark registrations and the Intellectual Property or for the
purpose of applying for, prosecuting, obtaining or protecting any
such patents, copyright, industrial design or trade mark
registrations in any and all countries of the world and the
Executive further agrees to cooperate and assist in ever way
possible in the prosecution and protection of any such applications
and the rights granted in respect thereof.
18.0 Non
18.01 The Executive shall not during the period of this
Agreement and for a period of 6 from the date of the termination of
this Agreement and/or the Executive’s employment with the
Company, (whichever occurs first) if the Company terminates the
Agreement without cause and for a period of 12 months from the date
of the termination of this Agreement and/or the Executive’s
employment with the Company, (whichever occurs first) if terminated
for cause, or by the Executive (without prior written consent of
the Company, which may be reasonably withheld), either individually
or in partnership, or in conjunction with any person or persons,
firm, association, syndicate, company or corporation as principal,
agent, director, officer, Executive, consultant, investor, or in
any other manner whatsoever, carry on or be engaged in or be
concerned with or interested in, or advise, lend money to,
guarantee the debts or obligations of or permit his/her name or any
part thereof to be used or employed by the Company’s
competitors in the unified messaging business as at the date of
termination, in any geographical location where the Executive was
employed during the course of his/her employment with the
Company
18.02 The Executive further covenants and agrees that he will not
disclose, at any time, any Business Opportunities.
18.03 The Executive hereby acknowledges that irreparable damage may
result to the Company, its business or property in the event of the
breach of any of the covenants and assurances herein agreed to by
the Executive and that this agreement was made by the Company and
continues primarily upon the Executive’s covenants and
assurances herein, and the Executive hereby covenants that in the
event of such breach or danger thereof, the Company shall be
entitled, in addition to any other remedies and damages available,
to an interlocutory or permanent injunction whereby the Executive
shall be ordered to respect the covenants and assurances contained
in this Agreement.
18.04 The covenants of the Executive contained in section 18.01
shall survive the termination of this Agreement for any reason
including for reason of any breach hereof.
19.0 Nonsolicitation
19.01 The Executive shall not, without the prior written consent
of the Company, at any time for a period of 12following the date of
termination of this Agreement and the Executive’s employment
for whatever reason with or without cause, either on his/her own
behalf or on behalf of any other person competing or endeavoring to
compete with the Company, directly or indirectly, solicit, endeavor
to solicit or gain the custom of, canvass or interfere with any
person who:
- was a
customer or a representative of a customer of the Company as of the
date of such termination;
- a customer of the Company at any time within the oneperiod
immediately preceding the date of such termination;
- an employee of the Company at any time within the one-year period
immediately preceding the date of such termination;
- pursued as a prospective customer by or on behalf of ‘the
Company at any time within 12 months prior to the date of such
termination in respect of whom the Company had not decided to cease
all such pursuit; or use his/her personal knowledge or influence
over any such customer to or for his/her own benefit or that of
another person competing with or endeavoring to compete with the
Company.
19.02 Subclauses (a), (b) and (c) are each separate and
distinct covenants severable one from the other and if any such
covenant is determined to be void or unenforceable by any court of
competent jurisdiction, this shall not affect the validity of any
other such covenant.
20.0 Reasonableness of Restrictions
20.01 The Executive hereby acknowledges and agrees that the
provisions of and all restrictions contained in sections 18.01 to
18.04 and 19.01 of this Agreement are reasonable in scope,
geographical area and time and are necessary for the protection of
the Company's legitimate interests and proprietary rights and are
an essential condition to and a fundamental term of this Agreement
without which The Company would not have entered into this
Agreement. The Executive furthermore acknowledges and represents
that he have reviewed the provisions hereof with their counsel and
that they understand them and are satisfied the provisions hereof
are both necessary and reasonable. The Executive hereby furthermore
acknowledges that complying with the provisions of sections 18.01
to 18.03 and 19.01 hereof will not unduly or unreasonably prejudice
the Executive, and that the current arrangements being made between
the Company and the Executive and the other covenants of this
agreement constitute adequate and sufficient consideration to
enable them to comply with the provisions thereof.
21.0 Notice to Next Company
21.01 The Executive agrees that prior to commencing any
engagement with any other company following termination of the
engagement of the Executive with the Company he shall disclose to
such other company the terms of this Agreement.
22.0 Termination
22.01 This agreement shall be deemed to terminate on the death
of the Executive, the expiry of the Term or, at the option of the
Company, in the event of the Executive’s absence or inability
to render the services required hereunder due to disability,
illness, incapacity or otherwise, (but excluding vacation time) for
an aggregate of 45 days during any 12 month period during the term
herein.
22.02 The Company may terminate this agreement at any time for
cause, including but not limited to any breach of any of the terms
contained herein, upon written notice specifying same to the
Executive.
22.04 In the event of termination, for any reason whatsoever, the
Executive shall return to the Company all assets of the Company
which may be in the possession of the Executive, whether on or off
the normal site of work.
22.05 In the event of termination, any benefits to or on behalf of
the Executive which have been pre-paid by the Company shall be
adjusted as of the effective date of such termination and
reimbursed to the Company by the Executive. The Company shall be
entitled to off-set and deduct any such amounts from any
compensation remaining to be paid to the Executive.
22.06 In the
event of termination for any reason except for termination of the
Executive’s employment by the Company for cause, performance
for the purposes of any bonus calculation or options based upon
performance, will be appraised for the partial year and the
Executive will receive a pro-rata entitlement.
23.0 Entire
Contract
23.01 There are no representations, warranties, conditions,
terms or collateral contracts or agreements affecting the
employment contemplated in this agreement except as set out
herein.
24.0 Amendment:
24.01 Except for increases in remuneration or extension of
employment benefits, the terms of this agreement shall remain in
force until terminated and shall only be amended by agreement in
writing signed by both parties.
24.02 Should any provision or provisions in this agreement be held
to be void or unenforceable by any Court of competent jurisdiction
based on any stipulation with respect to area or time herein, this
agreement shall be deemed to be amended with such area and/or time
altered to reflect the area or time deemed acceptable and
enforceable by such Court.
25.0 Severance
25.01 Subject to the aforesaid, should any provision or provisions
in the agreement be held to be void or unenforceable by any Court
of competent jurisdiction, the same shall be severed and shall not
affect the validity of the remainder of this agreement.
26.0 Executive’s Acknowledgment
26.01 The Executive acknowledges that he has fully read this
agreement and the terms herein. The Executive acknowledges his
concurrence with the same and his opportunity to consult with
independent legal counsel before execution.
27.0 Gender
27.01 Wherever the masculine gender is used herein, the
same shall be construed as being the feminine gender where the
context so requires.
28.0 Headings
28.01 Headings included in this agreement are for ease of
reference only and shall not be used in any way in the
interpretation of this Agreement.
29.0 Jurisdiction
29.01 This agreement shall be governed by the laws of the
Province of British Columbia.
In Witness Whereof, the parties have hereto set their hands
effective the date first written above.
Signed on
behalf of Voice Mobility Inc.Executive Signature
Per: /s/ Thomas O’Flaherty | /s/ James Hutton |
Date: May 5, 2000 | Date: May 5, 2000
|
SCHEDULE
A - Particulars of Executive Employment
Contract.
Position:Chief Executive Officer
Reports To:Board of Directors
Types of Services:
The
Executive shall serve as the Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, with specific responsibilities for Business Development.
He shall also act as the Company visionary, and shall support
investor activities.
The Executive
will carry out such further functions as may be directed by the
Board of Directors of the Company.
Remuneration:
a) Salary:- $150,000.00 (Cdn) per annum, paid bi-monthly
b) Other Benefits: (some of which may be
taxable)
Full Medical, Dental and AD&D as provided by the Company to
all Executives. The Company reserves the right to alter the benefit
plan at any time, in their sole discretion.
Car allowance of $500.00 per month.
c) Options
The Company
has provided will provide the Executive with an option to purchase
250,000 shares of Common Stock or Voice Mobility International,
Inc., a Nevada corporation, pursuant to the terms and conditions of
the 1999 Stock Option Plan (the Planmore particularly set
out in the Option Agreement, attached as Schedule B hereto.
It is
expressly agreed that if the if MBO targets are not met in any
given year, the options designated for that year will not vest and
will cease to be available.
d) Bonus Targets for Year Ending December 31, 2000
A target bonus of up to $100,000.00 may be earned for 2000
based on achievement of specified objectives. These objectives are
to be agreed upon by April 30, 2000 and assessed by December 31,
2000. Details are provided in Schedule C.
Holidays: three weeks per year.