UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003
OR
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ________to _________
Commission file number 000-23877
Heritage Commerce Corp
|
|
|
|
150 Almaden Boulevard
San Jose, California 95113
(408) 947-6900
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES [X] NO [ ]
Indeicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES [X] NO [ ]
APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:
The Registrant had 11,233,650 shares of Common
Stock outstanding on April 30, 2003.
Heritage Commerce Corp and Subsidiaries
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
Table of Contents
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Page No.
Item 1. Financial Statements
(unaudited):
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
Condensed Consolidated Income Statements
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Condensed Consolidated Notes to Financial Statements
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
Signatures
Certifications Under Section 302 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002
Exhibit Index
Part I -- FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
HERITAGE COMMERCE CORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
March 31, December 31, (Dollars in thousands) 2003 2002 ------------ ------------ ASSETS Cash and due from banks......................................... $ 35,141 $ 35,610 Interest bearing deposits in other financial institutions....... 7,522 7,022 Federal funds sold.............................................. 81,300 44,000 ------------ ------------ Total cash and cash equivalents.................. 123,963 86,632 Securities available-for-sale, at fair value.................... 99,436 126,443 Loans held for sale, at lower of cost or market................. 26,776 28,084 Loans, net of deferred costs.................................... 651,526 673,907 Allowance for probable loan losses.............................. (14,247) (13,227) ------------ ------------ Loans, net....................................... 637,279 660,680 Premises and equipment, net..................................... 4,880 5,194 Accrued interest receivable and other assets.................... 23,593 24,549 Other investments............................................... 27,188 27,170 ------------ ------------ TOTAL............................................ $ 943,115 $ 958,752 ============ ============ LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY Liabilities: Deposits Demand, noninterest bearing............................... $ 245,203 $ 248,616 Demand, interest bearing.................................. 94,499 94,309 Savings and money market.................................. 303,278 290,417 Time deposits, under $100................................. 45,154 46,341 Time deposits, $100 and over.............................. 106,816 114,613 Brokered deposits......................................... 29,676 47,640 ------------ ------------ Total deposits............................................... 824,626 841,936 Accrued interest payable and other liabilities............... 10,773 10,951 Mandatorily redeemable cumulative trust preferred securities of subsidiary grantor trust.................... 23,000 23,000 ------------ ------------ Total liabilities................................ 858,399 875,887 ------------ ------------ Commitments and contingencies Shareholders' equity: Preferred stock, no par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; none outstanding.......................................... -- -- Common stock, no par value; 30,000,000 shares authorized; shares issued and outstanding: 11,222,564 at March 31, 2003 and 11,214,414 at December 31, 2002........ 64,231 63,957 Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of taxes......... 1,362 1,714 Retained earnings............................................ 19,123 17,194 ------------ ------------ Total shareholders' equity....................... 84,716 82,865 ------------ ------------ TOTAL............................................ $ 943,115 $ 958,752 ============ ============
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
HERITAGE COMMERCE CORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
Three Months Ended March 31, ------------------------ (Dollars in thousands, except per share data) 2003 2002 ----------- ----------- Interest income: Loans, including fees...................................... $ 11,185 $ 11,609 Securities, taxable....................................... 1,069 1,064 Securities, non-taxable................................... 96 141 Interest bearing deposits in other financial institutions.. 16 27 Federal funds sold......................................... 82 230 ----------- ----------- Total interest income 12,448 13,071 ----------- ----------- Interest expense: Deposits................................................... 2,279 3,800 Mandatorily redeemable trust preferred securities.......... 490 481 Other...................................................... -- 11 ----------- ----------- Total interest expense........................................ 2,769 4,292 ----------- ----------- Net interest income before provision for probable loan losses................................................. 9,679 8,779 Provision for probable loan losses............................ 1,300 675 ----------- ----------- Net interest income after provision for probable loan losses................................................. 8,379 8,104 ----------- ----------- Noninterest income: Gain on sale of loans...................................... 557 421 Servicing income........................................... 425 268 Gain on sale of securities available-for-sale.............. 425 287 Service charges and other fees on deposit accounts......... 411 316 Other investment .......................................... 334 275 Other ..................................................... 812 323 ----------- ----------- Total noninterest income...................................... 2,964 1,890 ----------- ----------- Noninterest expenses: Salaries and employee benefits............................. 4,712 4,534 Occupancy.................................................. 819 718 Furniture and equipment.................................... 395 356 Loan origination costs..................................... 317 290 Professional fees.......................................... 271 225 Client services............................................ 250 158 Advertising and promotion.................................. 171 130 Stationery & supplies...................................... 106 76 Telephone.................................................. 83 74 Other...................................................... 1,380 1,140 ----------- ----------- Total noninterest expenses.................................... 8,504 7,701 ----------- ----------- Income before provision for income taxes...................... 2,839 2,293 Provision for income taxes.................................... 910 780 ----------- ----------- Net income.................................................... $ 1,929 $ 1,513 =========== =========== Earnings per share: Basic.................................................... $ 0.17 $ 0.14 =========== =========== Diluted.................................................. $ 0.17 $ 0.13 =========== ===========
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
HERITAGE COMMERCE CORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
Three Months Ended March 31, -------------------------- (Dollars in thousands) 2003 2002 ------------ ------------ Cash flows from operating activities: Net income.......................................................... $ 1,929 $ 1,513 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: Depreciation and amortization....................................... 429 392 Provision for probable loan losses.................................. 1,300 675 Gain on sale of securities available-for-sale....................... (425) (287) Amortization of premiums / accretion of discounts................... 350 190 Gains on sales of loans held for sale............................... (557) (421) Proceeds from sales of loans held for sale......................... 10,855 11,624 Originations of loans held for sale................................. (18,341) (18,745) Maturities of loans held for sale................................... 9,351 6,425 Appreciation of corporate owned life insurance...................... (334) (275) Effect of changes in: Accrued interest receivable and other assets.................... 956 (3,418) Accrued interest payable and other liabilities.................. 171 202 ------------ ------------ Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities................. 5,684 (2,125) ------------ ------------ Cash flows from investing activities: Net decrease (increase) in loans.................................... 22,101 (1,577) Purchases of securities available-for-sale.......................... (4,087) (9,597) Maturities/paydowns/calls of securities available-for-sale.......... 9,098 6,776 Proceeds from sales of securities available-for-sale............... 21,370 7,783 Maturities/paydowns/calls of securities held-to-maturity............ -- 852 Redemption (purchases) of other investments......................... 316 (694) Purchases of premises and equipment................................. (115) (101) ------------ ------------ Net cash provided by investing activities........................... 48,683 3,442 ------------ ------------ Cash flows from financing activities: Net (decrease) increase in deposits................................. (17,310) 16,131 Net proceeds from issuance of common stock.......................... 274 169 ------------ ------------ Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities................. (17,036) 16,300 ------------ ------------ Net increase in cash and cash equivalents........................... 37,331 17,617 Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period...................... 86,632 106,319 ------------ ------------ Cash and cash equivalents, end of period............................ $ 123,963 $ 123,936 ============ ============ Supplemental disclosures of cash paid during the period for: Interest......................................................... $ 3,385 $ 5,407 Income taxes..................................................... $ 350 $ 3,650
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
HERITAGE COMMERCE CORP AND
SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2003
(Unaudited)
1)
Basis of PresentationThe unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Heritage Commerce Corp (the "Company") and its wholly owned subsidiary: Heritage Bank of Commerce (HBC) have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations for reporting on Form 10-Q. Accordingly, certain information and notes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP") for complete financial statements are not included herein. The interim statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002. The Company has also established the following subsidiary trusts: Heritage Capital Trust I; Heritage Statutory Trust I; Heritage Statutory Trust II; and Heritage Commerce Corp Statutory Trust III which are Delaware Statutory business trusts formed for the exclusive purpose of issuing and selling trust preferred securities.
HBC is a commercial bank serving customers located in Santa Clara, Alameda, and Contra Costa counties of California. No customer accounts for more than 10 percent of revenue for HBC or the Company. Management evaluates the Company's performance as a whole and does not allocate resources based on the performance of different lending or transaction activities. Accordingly, the Company and its subsidiary operate as one business segment.
In the Company's opinion, all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of these condensed consolidated financial statements have been included and are of a normal and recurring nature. Certain reclassifications have been made to prior year amounts to conform to current year presentation.
The results for the three months ended March 31, 2003 are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for any subsequent period or for the entire year ending December 31, 2003.
2) Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share reflects potential dilution from outstanding stock options, using the treasury stock method. For each of the periods presented, net income is the same for basic and diluted earnings per share. Reconciliation of weighted average shares used in computing basic and diluted earnings per share is as follows:
Three Months Ended March 31, ------------------------ 2003 2002 ----------- ----------- Weighted average common shares outstanding - used in computing basic earnings per share..................... 11,220,369 11,122,179 Dilutive effect of stock options outstanding, using the treasury stock method........................... 261,432 272,544 ----------- ----------- Shares used in computing diluted earnings per share........... 11,481,801 11,394,723 =========== ===========
3)
Comprehensive IncomeComprehensive Income includes net income and other comprehensive income, which represents the change in the Company's net assets during the period from non-owner sources. The Company's sources of other comprehensive income are unrealized gains and losses on securities available- for-sale and I/O strips, which are treated like available-for-sale securities, and are presented net of tax. Reclassification adjustments resulting from gains or losses on investment securities that were realized and included in net income of the current period that also had been included in other comprehensive income as unrealized holding gains or losses in the period in which they arose are excluded from comprehensive income of the current period. The Company's total comprehensive income was as follows:
Three Months Ended March 31, ------------------------ 2003 2002 (Dollars in thousands) ----------- ----------- Net income.................................................... $ 1,929 $ 1,513 Other comprehensive loss, net of tax: Net unrealized holding losses on available-for-sale securities and I/O strips during the period.............. (63) (176) Less: reclassification adjustment for realized losses on available-for-sale securities included in net income during the period.................. (289) (189) ----------- ----------- Other comprehensive loss...................................... (352) (365) ----------- ----------- Comprehensive income.......................................... $ 1,577 $ 1,148 =========== ===========
4) Stock-Based Compensation
The Company accounts for stock-based awards to employees using the intrinsic value method in accordance with Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. No compensation expense has been recognized in the financial statements for employee stock arrangements, as the Company's stock option plan provides for the issuance of options at a price of no less than the fair market value at the date of the grant.
SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, requires the disclosure of pro forma net income and earnings per share had the Company adopted the fair value method at the grant date of all stock options. Under SFAS No. 123, the fair value of stock-based awards to employees is calculated through the use of option pricing models, even though such models were developed to estimate the fair value of freely tradable, fully transferable options without vesting restrictions, which differ significantly from the Company's stock option awards. Those models also require subjective assumptions, which greatly affect the calculated values. The Company's calculations were made using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions: expected life, 84 months; risk-free interest rate, 1.1% and 1.8% for March 31, 2003 and 2002; stock volatility of 22% and 26% in March 31, 2003 and 2002; and no dividends during the expected term. The Company's calculations are based on a multiple option valuation approach, and forfeitures are recognized as they occur.
Had compensation expense for the Company's stock option plan been determined under the requirements of SFAS No. 123 the Company's pro forma net income and earnings per common share would have been as follows:
Three Months Ended March 31, 2003 2002 (Amounts in thousands, except per share data) --------- --------- Net income As reported................................................... $ 1,929 $ 1,513 Less: Compensation expense for amortization of fair value of stock awards, net of taxes.................................. (186) (159) ----------- ----------- Pro forma..................................................... $ 1,743 $ 1,354 =========== =========== Net income per common share - basic As reported................................................... $ 0.17 $ 0.14 Pro forma..................................................... $ 0.16 $ 0.12 Net income per common share - diluted As reported................................................... $ 0.17 $ 0.13 Pro forma..................................................... $ 0.15 $ 0.12
5) Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Effective January 1, 2003, the Company adopted SFAS No. 146, "Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities" which addresses accounting for restructuring and similar costs. SFAS No. 146 supersedes previous accounting guidance, principally Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 94-3. SFAS No. 146 requires that the liability for costs associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized when the liability is incurred. Under Issue 94-3, a liability for an exit cost was recognized at the date of the Company's commitment to an exit plan. SFAS No. 146 also establishes that the liability should initially be measured and recorded at fair value. The adoption of SFAS No. 146 did not have a material effect on the Company's financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
6) Reclassifications
Certain amounts in the December 31, 2002 and March 31, 2002 financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the March 31, 2003 financial statement presentation.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Discussions of certain matters in this Report on Form 10-Q may constitute forward looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and as such, may involve risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and describe future plans, strategies, and expectations, are generally identifiable by the use of words such as "believe", "expect", "intend", "anticipate", "estimate", "project", or similar expressions. These forward-looking statements relate to, among other things, expectations of the business environment in which the Company operates, projections of future performance, potential future performance, potential future credit experience, perceived opportunities in the market, and statements regarding the Company's mission and vision. The Company's actual results, performance, and achievements may differ materially from the results, performance, and achievements expressed or implied in such forward-looking statements due to a wide range of factors. The factors include, but are not limited to changes in interest rates, general economic conditions, legislative and regulatory changes, monetary and fiscal policies of the US Government, real estate valuations, competition in the financial services industry, and other risks. All of the Company's operations and most of its customers are located in California. During the past year, the availability of a sufficient supply of electrical power in California has been unreliable at times. In addition, other events, including those of September 11, 2001, have increased the uncertainty related to the national and California economic outlook and could have an effect on the future operations of the Company or its customers, including borrowers. The Company does not undertake, and specifically disclaims any obligation, to update any forward-looking statements to reflect occurrences or unanticipated events or circumstances after the date of such statements.
Heritage operates as the bank holding company for its subsidiary bank: Heritage Bank of Commerce (the "Bank"). HBC is California state chartered bank, which offers a full range of commercial and personal banking services to residents and the business/professional community in Santa Clara, Contra Costa and Alameda Counties, California. The accounting and reporting policies of Heritage Commerce Corp and its subsidiary conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and prevailing practices within the banking industry.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
General
Heritage Commerce Corp's financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). The financial information contained within our financial statements is, to a significant extent, based on approximate measures of the financial effects of transactions and events that have already occurred. A variety of factors could affect the ultimate value that is obtained either when earning income, recognizing an expense, recovering an asset or relieving a liability. In certain instances, the Company uses the discount factor and prepayment assumptions to determine the present value of assets and liabilities. A change in the discount factor or prepayment spreads could increase or decrease the values of those assets and liabilities which would result in either a beneficial or adverse impact to the Company's financial results. The Company used historical loss experience as one factor in determining the inherent loss that may be present in the Company's loan portfolio. Actual losses could differ significantly from the historical factors that we use. Other estimates that the Company used are related to the expected useful lives of the Company's depreciable assets. In addition GAAP itself may change from one previously acceptable method to another method. Although the economics of the Company's transactions would be the same, the timing of events that would impact the Company's transactions could change.
Allowance for Probable Loan Losses
The allowance for probable loan losses is an estimate of the losses that may be sustained in the Company's loan portfolio. The allowance is based on two basic principles of accounting. (1) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 5 "Accounting for Contingencies", which requires that losses be accrued when they are probable of occurring and estimable and (2) SFAS No. 114, "Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan", which requires that losses be accrued based on the differences between the value of collateral, present value of future cash flows or values that are observable in the secondary market and the loan balance.
The Company's allowance for probable loan losses has
three basic components: the formula allowance, the specific allowance and the
unallocated allowance. Each of these components is determined based upon
estimates that can and do change when the actual events occur. The formula
allowance uses an historical loss view as an indicator of future losses and as a
result could differ from the losses incurred in the future. The specific
allowance uses various techniques to arrive at an estimate of loss. Historical
loss information, and fair market value of collateral are used to estimate those
losses. The use of these values is inherently subjective and our actual losses
could be greater or less than the estimates. The unallocated allowance captures
losses that are attributable to various economic events, industry or geographic
sectors whose impact on the portfolio have occurred but have yet to be
recognized in either the formula or specific allowances. For further
information regarding our allowance for credit losses, see Allowance for
Probable Loan Losses on page 17.
Loan Sales and Servicing
The amounts of gains recorded on sales of loans and the initial recording of servicing assets and interest only strips is based on the estimated fair values of the respective components. In recording the initial value of the servicing assets and the fair value of the Interest-Only (I/O) strips receivable, the Company uses estimates which are made based on management's expectations of future prepayment and discount rates. For the quarter ended March 31, 2003, management's estimate of constant prepayment rate ("CPR") was 14% and the weighted average discount rate assumption was 10%. These prepayment and discount rates were based on current market conditions and historical performance of the various pools of loans. If actual prepayments with respect to sold loans occur more quickly than projected the carrying value of the servicing assets may have to be adjusted through a charge to earnings. Variations in prevailing interest rates on borrowed funds, changes in general economic conditions, among other factors, could cause changes in the prepayment experience. A corresponding decrease in the value of the I/O strip receivable would also be expected.
Stock Based Awards
The Company accounts for its stock based awards using the intrinsic value method in accordance with Accounting Principles Board ("APB") Opinion No. 25 and related interpretations. Since the Company's stock option plans provide for the issuance of options at a price of no less than the fair market value at the date of the grant, no compensation expense has been recognized in the financial statements at the date of grant.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Overview
Net income for the three months ended March 31, 2003 was $1,929,000, up 27% from $1,513,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2002. Earnings per diluted share for the three months ended March 31, 2003 were $0.17, up 31% from $0.13 per diluted share for the three months ended March 31, 2002. Annualized return on average assets and return on average equity for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 were 0.85% and 9.32%, compared with returns of 0.67% and 8.11%, for the same period in the prior year.
For the three months ended March 31, 2003, as compared with the same period in the prior year, net interest income increased from $8,779,000 to $9,679,000, an increase of $900,000, or 10%. The Company's net interest margin was 4.64% for the three months ended March 31, 2003, compared with 4.23% for the three months ended March 31, 2002, reflecting the result of a decrease in both the average level and cost of interest bearing liabilities and the change in mix of earning assets, primarily the increase in the volume of average loans.
Total assets as of March 31, 2003 were $943,115,000, an increase of $14,797,000, or 2%, from $928,318,000 as of March 31, 2002, and a decrease of $15,637,000, or 2%, from total assets of $958,752,000 as of December 31, 2002. Total deposits as of March 31, 2003 were $824,626,000, an increase of $587,000, or less than 1%, from $824,039,000 as of March 31, 2002, and a decrease of $17,310,000, or 2%, from total deposits of $841,936,000 as of December 31, 2002.
Total portfolio loans as of March 31, 2003 were $651,526,000, an increase of $17,342,000, or 3%, from $634,184,000 as of March 31, 2002 and a decrease of 3% from $673,907,000 as of December 31, 2002. The Company's allowance for probable loan losses was $14,247,000, or 2.19%, of total loans at March 31, 2003. This compares with an allowance for probable loan losses of $11,519,000, or 1.82%, and $13,227,000, or 1.96% of total loans at March 31, 2002 and December 31, 2002. The increase in the allowance for probable loan losses was due to increases in the Company's level of nonperforming assets and additional provisions to reflect the continued weaknesses in the economy. The Company's nonperforming assets increased to $4,800,000, compared to $1,026,000 as of March 31, 2002 and $4,571,000 as of December 31, 2002.
The Company's shareholders' equity at March 31, 2003 was $84,716,000, up from $75,891,000 at March 31, 2002 and $82,865,000 as of December 31, 2002. The increase in shareholders' equity is a result of the income generated over the period and the exercise of common stock options offset by a decline in other comprehensive income from fair value changes. Book value per share increased to $7.55 at March 31, 2003, from $6.82 at March 31, 2002 and $7.39 at December 31, 2002. The Company's leverage capital ratio was 11.31% at March 31, 2003 compared to 10.22% at March 31, 2002 and 10.80% at December 31, 2002.
Net Interest Income and Net Interest Margin
The following table presents the Company's average balance sheet, net interest income and the resultant yields and rates paid for the period presented:
For the Three Months Ended For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2003 March 31, 2002 --------------------------------- --------------------------------- Interest Average Interest Average Average Income/ Yield/ Average Income/ Yield/ (Dollars in thousands) Balance Expense Rate Balance Expense Rate - ---------------------------------------------------------- ---------- ---------- --------- ---------- ---------- --------- Assets: Loans, gross.............................................. $ 693,852 $ 11,185 6.54% $ 673,105 $ 11,609 6.99% Investment securities..................................... 116,921 1,165 4.04% 102,611 1,205 4.76% Interest bearing deposits in other financial institutions. 7,312 16 0.89% 8,059 27 1.36% Federal funds sold........................................ 28,014 82 1.19% 57,352 230 1.63% ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Total interest earning assets.......................... 846,099 $ 12,448 5.97% 841,127 $ 13,071 6.30% ---------- ---------- Cash and due from banks................................... 37,211 36,367 Premises and equipment, net............................... 5,215 5,356 Other assets.............................................. 34,431 26,627 ---------- ---------- Total assets........................................... $ 922,956 $ 909,477 ========== ========== Liabilities and shareholders' equity: Deposits: Demand, interest bearing.................................. $ 92,657 $ 146 0.64% $ 81,377 $ 187 0.93% Savings and money market.................................. 302,756 976 1.31% 241,945 1,138 1.91% Time deposits, under $100................................. 45,165 243 2.18% 67,459 636 3.82% Time deposits, $100 and over.............................. 107,853 550 2.07% 143,247 1,175 3.33% Brokered deposits......................................... 37,947 365 3.90% 68,032 664 3.96% Other borrowings.......................................... 24,022 489 8.26% 21,301 492 9.37% ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Total interest bearing liabilities..................... 610,400 $ 2,769 1.84% 623,361 $ 4,292 2.79% ---------- ---------- Demand deposits........................................... 217,630 200,010 Other liabilities......................................... 10,978 10,437 ---------- ---------- Total liabilities...................................... 843,354 833,808 Shareholders' equity...................................... 83,948 75,669 ---------- ---------- Total liabilities and shareholders' equity................................ $ 922,956 $ 909,477 ========== ========== Net interest income / margin.......................................... $ 9,679 4.64% $ 8,779 4.23% ========== ==========
Note: |
|
Yields and amounts earned on loans include loan fees of $1,101,000 and $1,142,000 for the three month periods ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Interest income is reflected on an actual basis, not a fully taxable equivalent basis, and does not include a fair value adjustment. Nonaccrual loans of $4,800,000 and $1,026,000 for the period ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively, are included in the average balance calculation above. |
The Company's net interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2003 was $9,679,000, an increase of $900,000 or 10% over the same three month period in the prior year. For the three months ended March 31, 2003 compared to the same periods in the prior year, average interest earning assets increased by $4,972,000, or 1%. For the three months ended March 31, 2003, the average yield on interest earning assets was 5.97%, down 33 basis points from 6.30% for the same period in 2002. Over the same period the rates paid on interest bearing liabilities declined 95 basis points to 1.84% from 2.79%. As a result, the net interest margin increased 41 basis points to 4.64% for the three months ended March 31, 2003, from 4.23% for the same period in the prior year. This increase was primarily attributable to the increase in average earning assets and the change in mix as average loan and investment balances increased while average federal funds decreased, coupled with a decrease in average interest bearing liabilities, primarily in time and brokered deposits, resulting in a decrease in the cost of interest bearing liabilities. These factors resulted in an increase in net interest margin of 41 basis points and an increase in net interest income of 10%, or $900,000.
The following table sets forth an analysis of the changes in interest income resulting from changes in the average volume of interest earning assets and liabilities and changes in the average rates earned and paid. The total change is shown in the column designated "Net Change" and is allocated in the columns to the left, to the portions respectively attributable to volume changes and rate changes that occurred during the period indicated. Changes due to both volume and rate have been allocated to the change in volume.
Three Months Ended March 31, 2003 vs. 2002 ---------------------------------- Increase (Decrease) Due to Change In: Average Average Net (Dollars in thousands) Volume Rate Change - -------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Interest earning assets Loans, gross.............................................. $ 334 $ (758) $ (424) Investment securities..................................... 143 (183) (40) Interest bearing deposits in other financial institutions. (2) (9) (11) Federal funds sold........................................ (86) (62) (148) ---------- ---------- ---------- Total interest earning assets................................ $ 389 $ (1,012) $ (623) ---------- ---------- ---------- Interest bearing liabilities Demand, interest bearing.................................. 18 $ (59) $ (41) Savings and money market.................................. 196 (358) (162) Time deposits, under $100................................. (120) (273) (393) Time deposits, $100 and over.............................. (180) (445) (625) Brokered Deposits......................................... (289) (10) (299) Other borrowings.......................................... 55 (58) (3) ---------- ---------- ---------- Total interest bearing liabilities........................... $ (320) $ (1,203) $ (1,523) ---------- ---------- ---------- Net interest income.......................................... $ 709 $ 191 $ 900 ========== ========== ==========
Provision for Probable Loan Losses
The provision for probable loan losses represents the current period expense associated with maintaining an appropriate allowance for credit losses. The loan loss provision and level of allowance for each period is dependent upon many factors, including loan growth, net charge-offs, changes in the composition of the loan portfolio, delinquencies, management's assessment of the quality of the loan portfolio, the valuation of problem loans and the general economic conditions in the Company's market area. Periodic fluctuations in the provision for loan losses result from management's assessment of the adequacy of the allowance for probable loan losses; however, actual loan losses may vary from current estimates. For the three months ended March 31, 2003, the provision for probable loan losses was $1,300,000, up $625,000, from $675,000 for the same periods in the prior year. See additional discussion at Allowance for Probable Loan Losses.
Noninterest Income
The following table sets forth the various components of the Company's noninterest income for the periods indicated:
Three Months Ended Increase March 31, 2003 versus 2002 -------------------- -------------------- (Dollars in thousands) 2003 2002 Amount Percent - ---------------------------------------------------- --------- --------- --------- --------- Gain on sale of loans............................... $ 557 $ 421 $ 136 32 % Servicing income.................................... 425 268 157 59 % Gain on sale of securities available-for-sale....... 425 287 138 48 % Service charges and other fees on deposits accounts. 411 316 95 30 % Other investment.................................... 334 275 59 21 % Other............................................... 812 323 489 151 % --------- --------- --------- Total............................................... $ 2,964 $ 1,890 $ 1,074 57 % ========= ========= =========
Noninterest income for the three months ended March 31, 2003 was $2,964,000, up 57% from $1,890,000 for the same periods in the prior year. The increases were primarily due to the increases in service charges and fees of $95,000 from an increase in the level of certain fees, increases in gain on sale of securities available-for-sale of $138,000 as the interest rate environment in the first quarter of 2003 provided the opportunity for the Company to realize gains on the sale of securities, increases in servicing income of $157,000, and increases in gain on sale of loans of $136,000. The increase in servicing income and in gains on sales of loans was primarily the result of expansion of the SBA lending operation into additional geographic areas of California and the overall increase in the level of loans serviced. The first quarter of 2003 also includes $310,000 of other income from the leasing of equipment. There was no income from equipment leasing in the first quarter of 2002.
Noninterest Expense
The following table sets forth the various components of the Company's noninterest expenses for the periods indicated:
Three Months Ended Increase March 31, 2003 versus 2002 -------------------- -------------------- (Dollars in thousands) 2003 2002 Amount Percent - ---------------------------------------------------- --------- --------- --------- --------- Salaries and employee benefits...................... $ 4,712 $ 4,534 $ 178 4 % Occupancy........................................... 819 718 101 14 % Furniture and equipment............................. 395 356 39 11 % Loan origination costs.............................. 317 290 27 9 % Professional fees................................... 271 225 46 20 % Client services..................................... 250 158 92 58 % Advertising and promotion........................... 171 130 41 32 % Stationery & supplies............................... 106 76 30 39 % Telephone........................................... 83 74 9 12 % Other............................................... 1,380 1,140 240 21 % --------- --------- --------- Total............................................... $ 8,504 $ 7,701 $ 803 10 % ========= ========= =========
The following table indicates the percentage of noninterest expense in each category:
For The Three Months Ended March 31, ------------------------------------------- Percent Percent (Dollars in thousands) 2003 of Total 2002 of Total - ---------------------------------------------------- --------- --------- --------- --------- Salaries and employee benefits...................... $ 4,712 55 % $ 4,534 59 % Occupancy........................................... 819 10 % 718 9 % Furniture and equipment............................. 395 5 % 356 5 % Loan origination costs.............................. 317 4 % 290 4 % Professional fees................................... 271 3 % 225 3 % Client services..................................... 250 3 % 158 2 % Advertising and promotion........................... 171 2 % 130 1 % Stationery & supplies............................... 106 1 % 76 1 % Telephone........................................... 83 1 % 74 1 % Other............................................... 1,380 16 % 1,140 15 % --------- --------- --------- --------- Total............................................... $ 8,504 100 % $ 7,701 100 % ========= ========= ========= =========
Noninterest expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2003 were $8,504,000, up $803,000, or 10%, from $7,701,000 for the same period in the prior year. For the three month ended March 31, 2003, salaries and benefits increased $178,000, or 4%, to $4,712,000, as compared to the same period in the prior year. The increases were primarily due to normal merit increases, and in activity-based commissions related to the Company's residential mortgage brokerage operations. For the comparative three month periods, occupancy increased by $101,000, or 14%, primarily as a result of increased rental costs. Occupancy costs, as a percentage of total noninterest expenses remained fairly constant over the comparative three month periods. For the comparative three month periods, professional fees increased $46,000, or 20%, to $271,000. The increases were primarily due to increased costs from professional service providers. For the comparative three month periods, furniture and equipment increased by $39,000, or 11%, to $395,000. The increase in furniture and equipment in 2003 from 2002 was due to costs for the addition of new facilities. For the comparative three month periods, loan origination costs increased by $27,000, or 9%, to $317,000. The increase from 2002 was primarily due to continued growth in the loan portfolio. For the comparative three month periods, client services increased $92,000, or 58%, to $250,000. The increase from 2002 was primarily as a result of the increase in services fees charged to the Company from third party vendors in 2003. For the comparative three month periods, advertising and promotion increased $41,000, or 32%, to $171,000. The increase from 2002 was primarily as a result of several new sponsorships in 2003. For the comparative three month periods, stationery and supplies increased by $30,000, or 39%, to $106,000, and telephone expense increased by $9,000, or 12%, to $83,000. The increase in stationery and supplies and phone expense from 2002 was primarily due to the addition of new facilities in 2003. For the comparative three month period, other noninterest expense increased $240,000, or 21%, to $1,380,000 in support of the overall growth of the Company and expenses related to the Company's investment in a low income housing project and leasing equipment.
Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes for the three months ended March 31, 2003 was $910,000, as compared to $780,000 for the same periods in the prior year. The following table shows the income tax rate for each period indicated.
Three Months Ended March 31, -------------------- 2003 2002 --------- --------- Income tax rate..................................... 32.05 % 34.02 %
The difference in the effective tax rate compared to the statutory tax rate of 42% is primarily the result of the Company's receipt of tax fee distributions from certain life insurance contracts, low income housing tax credits, and changes in the Company's level of investments in municipal securities.
FINANCIAL CONDITION
Total assets decreased $15,637,000, or 2%, to $943,115,000 at March 31, 2003 from $958,752,000 at December 31, 2002, and increased $14,797,000, or 2%, from $928,318,000 at March 31, 2002. Total portfolio loans decreased $22,381,000, or 3%, to $651,526,000 at March 31, 2003 from $673,907,000 at December 31, 2002, but increased $17,342,000, or 3%, from $634,184,000 at March 31, 2002. Total deposits decreased $17,310,000 or 2% to $824,626,000 at March 31, 2003 from $841,936,000 at December 31, 2002, and up slightly from $824,039,000 at March 31, 2002. The overall increase from March 31, 2002 reflects the continued internal growth of the Company. The decreases from December 31, 2002 reflects the Company's decision to reduce its reliance on interest rate sensitive deposits, including brokered deposits, and grow core deposits.
Securities Portfolio
The following table sets forth the carrying value of investment securities at the dates indicated:
March 31, ---------------------- December 31 (Dollars in thousands) 2003 2002 2002 - ----------------------------------------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Securities available-for-sale (at fair value) U.S. Treasury.................................. $ 4,631 3,556 $ 4,740 U.S. Government Agencies....................... 33,434 52,162 48,029 Mortgage-backed securities..................... 40,335 19,526 44,774 Municipals..................................... 9,115 4,147 12,134 Corporate bonds................................ -- 2,573 2,632 CMOs........................................... 11,921 4,034 14,134 ---------- ---------- ---------- Total securities available-for-sale............ $ 99,436 $ 85,998 $ 126,443 ========== ========== ========== Securities held-to-maturity (at amortized cost) Mortgage-backed securities..................... $ -- $ 4,053 $ -- CMOs........................................... -- 378 -- Municipals..................................... -- 9,996 -- ---------- ---------- ---------- Total securities held-to-maturity......... $ -- $ 14,427 $ -- ========== ========== ==========
The following table summarizes the composition of the Company's investment securities and the weighted average yields at March 31, 2003:
March 31, 2003 Maturity ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- After One and After Five and Within One Year Within Five Years Within Ten Years After Ten Years Total --------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------- Amount Yield Amount Yield Amount Yield Amount Yield Amount Yield (Dollars in thousands) -------- ------ -------- ------ -------- ------ -------- ------ --------- ------ Securities available-for-sale: U.S. Treasury.................. $ 1,312 1.54 % $ 3,319 2.09 % $ -- -- % $ -- -- % $ 4,631 1.94 % U.S. Government Agencies....... 7,033 5.23 % 26,401 3.27 % -- -- % -- -- % 33,434 3.68 % Mortgage-backed securities..... -- -- % -- -- % 1,568 5.62 % 38,767 4.31 % 40,335 4.36 % Municipals - taxable.......... 1,115 6.67 % 557 6.45 % -- -- % -- -- % 1,672 6.59 % Municipals - nontaxable....... 411 4.82 % 4,960 4.59 % 2,072 4.53 % -- -- % 7,443 4.58 % CMOs........................... -- -- % -- -- % 2,040 3.92 % 9,881 2.19 % 11,921 2.49 % -------- -------- -------- -------- --------- Total available-for-sale....... $ 9,871 4.88 % $ 35,237 3.38 % $ 5,680 4.60 % $ 48,648 3.88 % $ 99,436 3.85 % ======== ======== ======== ======== =========
Note: |
Yield on non-taxable municipal securities are not presented on a fully tax equivalent basis. |
Loans
Total loans (exclusive of loans held for sale) decreased $22,381,000, or 3%, to $651,526,000 as of March 31, 2003 from $673,907,000 as of December 31, 2002, but increased $17,342,000, or 3%, from $634,184,000 as of March 31, 2002.
For the three months ended March 31, 2003 $18,341,000 in loans guaranteed by the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) were generated and held for sale, and $10,298,000 of SBA loans held for sale was sold into the secondary market.
At March 31, 2003 and December 31, 2002, the Company serviced SBA loans, which it had sold into the secondary market of approximately $91,219,000 and $83,008,000. At March 31, 2003 and December 31, 2002, the carrying amount of the servicing assets was $1,615,000 and $1,538,000, respectively. There was no valuation allowance as of March 31, 2003 or December 31, 2002. The carrying amount of Interest-Only (I/O) strip receivable at March 31, 2003 and December 31, 2002 was $2,682,000 and $2,839,000, respectively. These assets represent the servicing spread generated from the sold guaranteed portions of SBA loans. Servicing income from these loans was $425,000 for the quarter ended March 31, 2003, compared to $268,000 for the same periods in 2002. Amortization of the related assets was $297,000 for the quarter ended March 31, 2003, compared to $243,000 for the same periods in 2002. Heritage Bank of Commerce is a preferred lender with the U.S. Small Business Administration, which allows the Company to grant certain U.S. Small Business Administration loans without the prior approval of the SBA.
The following table summarizes the composition of the Company's loan portfolio at the dates indicated:
March 31, % of December 31, % of (Dollars in thousands) 2003 Total 2002 Total - ----------------------------------- ------------ ----------- ----------- ----------- Commercial......................... $ 256,359 39 % $ 263,144 39 % Real estate - mortgage............. 250,668 38 % 259,974 38 % Real estate - land and construction 141,165 22 % 147,822 22 % Consumer........................... 2,823 1 % 2,850 1 % ------------ ----------- ----------- ----------- Total loans................... 651,015 100 % 673,790 100 % =========== =========== Deferred loan costs................ 511 117 Allowance for loan losses.......... (14,247) (13,227) ------------ ----------- Loans, net......................... $ 637,279 $ 660,680 ============ ===========
The Company's loan portfolio is based on commercial (primarily to companies engaged in manufacturing, wholesale, and service businesses) and real estate lending, with the balance in consumer loans. While no specific industry concentration is considered significant, the Company's lending operations are dependent on the technology and real estate industries and their supporting companies located within the Company's market area. Thus, the Company's borrowers could be adversely impacted by a downturn in these sectors of the economy, which could reduce the demand for loans and adversely impact the borrowers' abilities to repay their loans.
The following table sets forth the maturity distribution of the Company's loans at March 31, 2003:
Over One Due in Year But One Year Less Than Over (Dollars in thousands) or Less Five Years Five Years Total - ----------------------------------- ------------ ----------- ----------- ----------- Commercial......................... $ 243,156 $ 12,261 $ 942 $ 256,359 Real estate - mortgage............. 176,187 64,920 9,561 250,668 Real estate - land and construction 141,165 -- -- 141,165 Consumer........................... 2,564 259 -- 2,823 ------------ ----------- ----------- ----------- Total loans................... $ 563,072 $ 77,440 $ 10,503 $ 651,015 ============ =========== =========== =========== Loans with variable interest rates. $ 542,634 $ 44,530 $ 2,107 $ 589,271 Loans with fixed interest rates.... 20,438 32,910 8,396 61,744 ------------ ----------- ----------- ----------- Total loans................... $ 563,072 $ 77,440 $ 10,503 $ 651,015 ============ =========== =========== ===========
The table above also shows the distribution of such loans between those loans with predetermined (fixed) interest rates and those with variable (floating) interest rates. Floating rates generally fluctuate with changes in the prime rate as reflected in the western edition of The Wall Street Journal. At March 31, 2003, approximately 91% of the Company's loan portfolio consisted of floating interest rate loans.
Nonperforming assets
Nonperforming assets consist of nonaccrual loans, loans past due 90 days and still accruing, troubled debt restructurings and other real estate owned. Management generally places loans on nonaccrual status when they become 90 days past due, unless they are well secured and in the process of collection. When a loan is placed on nonaccrual status, any interest previously accrued but not collected is generally reversed from income. Loans are charged off when management determines that collection has become unlikely. Restructured loans are those where the Banks have granted a concession on the interest paid or original repayment terms due to financial difficulties of the borrower. Other real estate owned ("OREO") consists of real property acquired through foreclosure on the related underlying defaulted loans. The following table shows nonperforming assets at the dates indicated:
March 31, ---------------------- December 31, (Dollars in thousands) 2003 2002 2002 - -------------------------------------------- ---------- ---------- ----------- Nonaccrual loans............................ $ 4,800 $ 1,026 $ 4,571 Loans 90 days past due and still accruing -- -- -- Restructured loans.......................... -- -- -- ---------- ---------- ----------- Total nonperforming loans............... 4,800 1,026 4,571 Foreclosed assets........................... -- -- -- ---------- ---------- ----------- Total nonperforming assets.............. $ 4,800 $ 1,026 $ 4,571 ========== ========== =========== Nonperforming assets as a percentage of period end loans plus foreclosed assets... 0.74 % 0.16 % 0.68 %
As of March 31, 2003, the Company had $4,800,000 loans on nonaccrual status,
compared to $1,026,000 in the same period of the prior year, which were
considered impaired loans. The increase was primarily as a result of the
placement of one commercial real estate loan on nonaccrual status in third
quarter of 2002 and which continued on nonaccrual status through March 31, 2003.
The impaired loans had a related valuation allowance of $634,000 at March 31,
2003. The Company had no loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing
interest, no restructured loans and no foreclosed assets as of March 31, 2003
and 2002. The Company had $4,571,000 loans on nonaccrual status as of December
31, 2002, which were considered impaired loans. The Company had no loans past
due 90 days or more and still accruing interest, no restructured loans and no
foreclosed assets as of December 31, 2002. For the three months ended March 31,
2003, the Company had $106,000 foregone interest income on nonaccrual loans.
The Company had no foregone interest income on nonaccrual loans as of December
31, 2002. For the three months ended March 31, 2003, the Company recognized
$161,000 in interest income for cash payments received on nonaccrual loans. The
Company did not recognize any interest income for cash payments received on
nonaccrual loans for the three months ended March 31, 2002.
The Company assigns a risk grade consistent with
the system recommended by regulatory agencies to all of its loans. Grades range
from "Pass" to "Loss" depending on credit quality, with "Pass" representing
loans that involve an acceptable degree of risk. Management conducts a critical
evaluation of the loan portfolio monthly. This evaluation includes periodic loan
by loan review for certain loans to evaluate the level of impairment as well as
detailed reviews of other loans (either individually or in pools) based on an
assessment of the following factors: past loan loss experience, known and
inherent risks in the portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the
borrower's ability to repay, collateral value, loan volumes and concentrations,
size and complexity of the loans, recent loss experience in particular segments
of the portfolio, bank regulatory examination results, and current economic
conditions in the Company's marketplace, in particular the state of the
technology industry and the real estate market. This process attempts to assess the risk of loss inherent in
the portfolio by segregating loans into four components for purposes of
determining an appropriate level of the allowance: "watch," "special mention,"
"substandard" and "doubtful." Additionally, the Company maintains a program for
regularly scheduled reviews of certain new and renewed loans by an outside loan
review consultant. Any loans identified during an external review process that
expose the Company to increased risk are appropriately downgraded and an
increase in the allowance for loan losses is established for such loans.
Further, the Company is examined periodically by the FDIC, FRB, and the
California Department of Financial Institutions at which time a further review
of loan quality is conducted. Loans that demonstrate a weakness, for which there is a
possibility of loss if the weakness is not corrected, are categorized as
"classified." Classified loans include all loans graded substandard, doubtful
and loss and may result from problems specific to a borrower's business or from
economic downturns that affect the borrower's ability to repay or that cause a
decline in the value of the underlying collateral (particularly real
estate). Allowance for Loan Losses
It is the policy of management to maintain the allowance for probable loan losses at a level adequate for risks inherent in the loan portfolio. Based on information currently available to analyze loan loss delinquency and a history of actual charge-offs, management believes that the loan loss allowance is adequate. However, the loan portfolio can be adversely affected if California economic conditions and the real estate market in the Company's market area were to continue to weaken. Additionally, any weakness of a prolonged nature in the technology industry would have a negative impact on the local market. The effect of such events although uncertain at this time, could result in an increase in the level of nonperforming loans and increased loan losses, which could adversely affect the Company's future growth and profitability. No assurance of the ultimate level of credit losses can be given with any certainty. Loans are charged against the allowance when management believes that the collectibility of the principal is unlikely.
The following table summarizes the Company's loan loss experience as well as provisions, charge-offs and recoveries to the allowance for loan losses and certain pertinent ratios for the periods indicated:
Three Months Ended March 31, For the Year Ended -------------------- December 31, (Dollars in thousands) 2003 2002 2002 - --------------------------------------- --------- --------- ------------- Balance, beginning of period / year.... $ 13,227 $ 11,154 $ 11,154 Net charge-offs........................ (280) (310) (590) Provision for probable loan losses..... 1,300 675 2,663 --------- --------- ------------- Balance, end of period / year.......... $ 14,247 $ 11,519 $ 13,227 ========= ========= ============= Ratios: Net charge-offs to average loans outstanding........... 0.17 % 0.20 % 0.09 % Allowance for loan losses to average lo 2.15 % 1.80 % 2.07 % Allowance for loan losses to total loan 2.19 % 1.82 % 1.96 % Allowance for loan losses to non-performing assets............... 297 % 1,123 % 289 %
Charge-offs reflect the realization of losses in the portfolio that were recognized previously though provisions for probable loan losses. The net charge-offs as of March 31, 2003 were $280,000, compared to $310,000 as of March 31, 2002. Historical net charge-offs are not necessarily indicative of the amount of net charge-offs that the Company will realize in the future.
The following table summarizes the allocation of the allowance for loan losses (ALL) by loan type and the allocated allowance as a percent of loans outstanding in each loan category at the dates indicated:
March 31, 2003 March 31, 2002 December 31, 2002 -------------------- ------------------------ -------------------- Percent Percent Percent of ALL by of ALL by of ALL by category category category to total to total to total loans by loans by loans by (Dollars in thousands) Amount category Amount category Amount category - --------------------------------------- --------- --------- ------------- --------- --------- --------- Commercial............................. $ 7,910 3.09 % $ 5,770 2.68 % $ 6,349 2.41 % Real estate - mortgage................. 3,157 1.26 % 1,594 0.63 % 2,411 0.93 % Real estate - land and construction.... 3,180 2.25 % 3,002 1.87 % 3,574 2.42 % Consumer............................... 51 1.81 % 106 2.47 % 47 1.63 % Unallocated............................ (51) -- % 1,047 -- % 846 -- % --------- ------------- --------- Total ............................ $ 14,247 2.19 % $ 11,519 1.82 % $ 13,227 1.96 % ========= ============= =========
The increase in the allowance for loan losses from December 31, 2002 reflects the growth in the Company's overall level of loans, primarily in the commercial loan portfolio offset by decreases in the real estate land and construction portfolio and the impact of this change in mix on the need for additional allowances. The increase in the allowance from December 31, 2002 also reflects reserves attributed to an $8.3 million commercial loan with risk characteristics that create uncertainty about repayment in full under the original terms of the loan. Although the loan is still performing and on an accrual basis and the borrower has provided additional collateral, the Company has increased its loan loss reserve to mitigate the future impact in the event that the loan is not paid in full. Other than this loan and the loans already classified at March 31, 2003, the Company has not identified any potential problem loans which result in these loans being included as nonperforming or classified loans at a future date.
Loans are charged against the allowance when management believes that the collectibility of the principal is doubtful. The Company's methodology for assessing the appropriateness of the allowance consists of several key elements, which include specific allowances, the formula allowance and the unallocated allowance.
Specific allowances are established in cases where management has identified significant conditions or circumstances related to a credit that management believes indicate the probability that a loss may be incurred in excess of the amount determined by the application of the formula allowance. As of March 31, 2003, nonperforming loans had a related specific valuation allowance of $634,000.
The formula allowance is calculated by applying loss factors to outstanding loans and certain unused commitments. Loss factors are based on management's experience and may be adjusted for significant factors that, in management's judgment, may affect the collectibility of the portfolio as of the evaluation date. Due to the Company's limited historical loss experience, management utilizes their prior industry experience to determine the loss factor for each category of loan. The formula allowance on March 31, 2003 was $13,664,000, compared to $12,381,000 on December 31, 2002. The increase was attributable to several factors, most notably the change in the mix of loans and an increase in certain factors used to estimate the reserve allocations.
The unallocated allowance is based upon management's evaluation of various conditions that are not directly measured in the determination of the formula and specific allowances. The evaluation of the inherent loss with respect to these conditions is subject to a higher degree of uncertainty because they are not identified with specific problem credits or portfolio segments. As of March 31, 2003, the Company's unallocated allowance was below zero, compared to $846,000 on December 31, 2002. The Company had $175,000 in related evaluation allowance on a nonperforming asset that was classified as in process collection as of quarter end. A recovery of $275,000 was realized on this asset in April 2003. As a result of the recovery the related evaluation allowance has been reduced to approximately $40,000 and the unallocated allowance would have been $84,000 if the evaluation adjustment occurred at March 31, 2003. In evaluating the appropriateness of the unallocated allowance, management considered the changes in the trend of the volume and severity of past due and classified loans; and trends in the volume of nonaccrual loans, troubled debt restructurings and other loan modifications, changes in national and local economic and business conditions, trends, and developments, including the condition of various market segments, changes in underwriting standards and collection, charge-off, and recovery practices, and changes in the volume and mix of the loan portfolio and in credit concentrations particularly in commercial and real estate land and construction lending. There can be no assurance that the adverse impact of any of these conditions on the Bank will not be in excess of the range set forth above.
In addition, the current business, economic, and real estate markets along with the seasoning of the portfolio and the nature and duration of the current business cycle will affect the amount of unallocated reserve.
In an effort to improve its analysis of risk factors associated with its loan portfolio, the Company continues to monitor and to make appropriate changes to its internal loan policies. These efforts better enable the Company to assess risk factors prior to granting new loans and to assess the sufficiency of the allowance for loan losses.
Management believes that it has adequately provided an allowance for estimated probable losses in the credit portfolio. Significant deterioration in Northern California real property values or economic downturns could impact future operating results, liquidity or capital resources and require additional provisions to the allowance or cause losses in excess of the allowance.
Deposits
Deposits totaled $824,626,000 at March 31, 2003, down 2%, compared to deposits of $841,936,000 at December 31, 2002, and slightly increase from $824,039,000 at March 31, 2002. Compared to December 31, 2002, noninterest bearing demand deposits decreased $3,413,000 or 1%, interest bearing demand deposits increased $190,000 or less than 1%, savings and money market deposits increased $12,861,000 or 4%, time deposits decreased $8,984,000 or 6%, and brokered deposits decreased $17,964,000 or 38%.
The following table summarizes the distribution of average deposits and the average rates paid for the periods indicated:
Three Months Ended Year Ended March 31, 2003 December 31, 2002 -------------------- -------------------- Average Average Average Rate Average Rate (Dollars in thousands) Balance Paid Balance Paid - ------------------------------------- ---------- -------- ---------- -------- Demand, noninterest bearing.......... $ 217,630 -- % $ 211,195 -- % Demand, interest bearing............. 92,657 0.64 % 81,011 0.89 % Saving and money market.............. 302,756 1.31 % 275,217 1.74 % Time deposits, under $100............ 45,165 2.18 % 56,097 3.14 % Time deposits, $100 and over......... 107,853 2.07 % 129,702 2.75 % Brokered deposits.................... 37,947 3.90 % 65,183 3.87 % ---------- ---------- Total average deposits.......... $ 804,008 1.15 % $ 818,405 1.63 % ========== ==========
Deposit Concentration and Deposit Volatility
The following table indicates the maturity schedule of the Company's time deposits of $100,000 or more as of March 31, 2003.
% of (Dollars in thousands) Balance Total - ----------------------------------------------------------- ---------- -------- Three months or less....................................... $ 61,200 45 % Over three months through twelve months.................... 52,463 38 % Over twelve months......................................... 22,829 17 % ---------- -------- Total............................................... $ 136,492 100 % ========== ========
The Company focuses primarily on servicing business accounts that are frequently over $100,000 in average size. Certain types of accounts that the Company makes available are typically in excess of $100,000 in average balance per account, and certain types of business clients whom the Company serves typically carry deposits in excess of $100,000 on average. The account activity for some account types and client types necessitates appropriate liquidity management practices by the Company to ensure its ability to fund deposit withdrawals.
Return on Equity and Assets
The following table indicates the ratios on the annualized return on average assets and average equity and average equity to average assets for each indicated period.
Three Months Ended March 31, ------------------ 2003 2002 -------- -------- Return on average assets............... 0.85 % 0.67 % Return on average equity............... 9.32 % 8.11 % Average equity to average assets ratio. 9.10 % 8.32 %
Annualized return on average assets and return on average equity for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 were 0.85% and 9.32%, respectively, compared with returns of 0.67% and 8.11%, respectively, for the same period in 2002. The equity to asset ratio for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 was 9.10%, compared to 8.32% for the same period in 2002.
Interest Rate Risk
The planning of asset and liability maturities is an integral part of the management of an institution's net yield. To the extent maturities of assets and liabilities do not match in a changing interest rate environment, net yields may change over time. Even with perfectly matched repricing of assets and liabilities, risks remain in the form of prepayment of loans or investments or in the form of delays in the adjustment of rates of interest applying to either earning assets with floating rates or to interest bearing liabilities. The Company has generally been able to control its exposure to changing interest rates by maintaining primarily floating interest rate loans and a majority of its time certificates with relatively short maturities
The following table sets forth the interest rate sensitivity of the Company's interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities at March 31, 2003, using the rate sensitivity gap ratio. For purposes of the following table, an asset or liability is considered rate-sensitive within a specified period when it can be repriced or when it is scheduled to mature within the specified time frame:
Due in Due After Within Three to One to Due After Not Three Twelve Five Five Rate- (Dollars in thousands) Months Months Years Years Sensitive Total - ------------------------------------------------------------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- Interest earning assets: Federal funds sold......................................... $ 81,300 $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 81,300 Interest bearing deposits in other financial institutions.. 7,522 -- -- -- -- 7,522 Securities................................................. 6,290 3,581 35,237 54,328 -- 99,436 Total loans................................................ 520,607 69,752 77,440 10,503 -- 678,302 --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- Total interest earning assets............................ 615,719 73,333 112,677 64,831 -- 866,560 --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- Cash and due from banks...................................... -- -- -- -- 35,141 35,141 Other assets................................................. -- -- -- -- 41,414 41,414 --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- Total assets............................................. $ 615,719 $ 73,333 $ 112,677 $ 64,831 $ 76,555 $ 943,115 ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= Interest bearing liabilities: Demand, interest bearing................................... $ 94,499 $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 94,499 Savings and money market................................... 303,278 -- -- -- -- 303,278 Time deposits.............................................. 79,069 74,035 28,542 -- -- 181,646 Mandatorily Redeemable Cumulative Trust Preferred Securities............................... -- -- -- 23,000 -- 23,000 --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- Total interest bearing liabilities....................... 476,846 74,035 28,542 23,000 -- 602,423 --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- Noninterest demand deposits.................................. 96,567 -- -- -- 148,636 245,203 Other liabilities............................................ -- -- -- -- 10,773 10,773 Shareholders' equity......................................... -- -- -- -- 84,716 84,716 --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- Total liabilities and shareholders' equity............... $ 573,413 $ 74,035 $ 28,542 $ 23,000 $ 244,125 $ 943,115 ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= Interest rate sensitivity GAP................................ $ 42,306 $ (702) $ 84,135 $ 41,831 $(167,570) $ 943,115 ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= Cumulative interest rate sensitivity GAP..................... $ 42,306 $ 41,604 $ 125,739 $ 167,570 $ -- $ -- Cumulative interest rate sensitivity GAP ratio............... 4.49 % 4.41 % 13.33 % 17.77 % -- % -- %
The foregoing table demonstrates that the Company had a positive cumulative one year gap of $41,604,000, or 4.41% of total assets, at March 31, 2003. In theory, this would indicate that $41,604,000 more in assets than liabilities would reprice if there were a change in interest rates over the next year. If interest rates were to increase, the positive gap would tend to result in a higher net interest margin, conversely if interest rates were to decline, the positive gap would tend to result in a lower interest margin. However, changes in the mix of earning assets or supporting liabilities can either increase or decrease the net margin without affecting interest rate sensitivity. This characteristic is referred to as a basis risk and, generally, relates to the repricing characteristics of certain short-term funding sources.
Interest rate changes do not affect all categories of assets and liabilities equally or at the same time. Varying interest rate environments can create unexpected changes in prepayment levels of assets and liabilities, which may have a significant effect on the net interest margin and are not reflected in the interest sensitivity analysis table. Because of these factors, an interest sensitivity gap report may not provide a complete assessment of the exposure to changes in interest rates. To supplement traditional GAP analysis, the Company performs simulation modeling to estimate the potential effects of changing interest rate environments. The process allows the Company to explore the complex relationships within the GAP over time and various interest rate environments.
Liquidity risk represents the potential for loss as a result of limitations on the Company's ability to adjust for future cash flows, to meet the needs of depositors and borrowers, and to fund operations on a timely and cost-effective basis. The liquidity policy approved by the board of directors requires annual review of the Company's liquidity by the asset/liability committee, which is composed of senior executives, and the finance and investment committee of the board of directors.
The Company's internal asset/liability committee and the finance and investment committee of the board of directors each meet monthly to monitor the Company's investments, liquidity needs and to oversee its asset/liability management. The Company evaluates the rates offered on its deposit products on a weekly basis.
Liquidity and Liability Management
To meet liquidity needs, the Company maintains a portion of its funds in cash deposits in other banks, in Federal funds sold, and in investment securities. At March 31, 2003, the Company's primary liquidity ratio was 19.44%, comprised of $48,065,000 in investment securities available-for-sale with maturities (or probable calls) of up to five years, less $14,514,000 of securities that were pledged to secure public and certain other deposits as required by law and contract; Federal funds sold of $81,300,000, and $42,663,000 in cash and due from banks, as a percentage of total unsecured deposits of $810,112,000.
Capital Resources
The following table summarizes risk-based capital, risk-weighted assets, and risk-based capital ratios of the Company:
March 31, ---------------------- December 31, (Dollars in thousands) 2003 2002 2002 - --------------------------------- ---------- ---------- ------------ Capital components: Tier 1 Capital................ $ 104,739 $ 93,176 $ 102,614 Tier 2 Capital................ 10,117 9,686 10,563 ---------- ---------- ------------ Total risk-based capital.... $ 114,856 $ 102,862 $ 113,177 ========== ========== ============ Risk-weighted assets............. $ 803,951 $ 789,256 $ 842,399 Average assets................... $ 925,821 $ 913,780 $ 950,091 Minimum Regulatory Requirements ----------- Capital ratios: Total risk-based capital....... 14.3 % 13.0 % 13.4 % 8.0 % Tier 1 risk-based capital...... 13.0 % 11.8 % 12.2 % 4.0 % Leverage ratio (1)............. 11.3 % 10.2 % 10.8 % 4.0 %
(1) |
|
Tier 1 capital divided by average assets (excluding goodwill). |
At March 31, 2003 and 2002, and December 31, 2002, the Company's capital met all minimum regulatory requirements. As of March 31, 2003, management believes that HBC was considered "Well Capitalized" under the Prompt Corrective Action Provisions.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
No material changes have occurred during the quarter to the Company's market risk profile or information. For further information refer to the Company's Form 10-K.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a)
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Rule 13a-14(c) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), within 90 days of the filing date of this report. Based on their evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal accounting officer concluded that Heritage Commerce Corp's disclosure controls and procedures are effective.(b) There have been no significant changes (including corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies or material weaknesses) in our internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of the evaluation referenced in paragraph (a) above.
Exhibits Number Name
The Registrant filed a Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 22, 2003 under item 5 to report its year end 2002 financial results, and containing condensed summarized statements of financial position and results of operations.
The Registrant furnished a Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 24, 2003 under item 9 and item 12 to report its first quarter ended March 31, 2003 financial results, and condensed consolidated financial information.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
Heritage Commerce Corp (Registrant) |
May 14, 2003 Date |
|
/s/ Brad L. Smith Brad L. Smith, Chief Executive Officer |
May 14, 2003 Date |
|
/s/ Lawrence D. McGovern Lawrence D. McGovern, Chief Financial Officer |
(Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2003
I, Brad L. Smith, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Heritage Commerce Corp;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors:
a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and
6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Date: May 14, 2003
/s/ Brad L. Smith
Brad L. Smith
Chief Executive Officer
CERTIFICATION
(Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2003
I, Lawrence D. McGovern, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Heritage Commerce Corp;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors:
a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and
6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Date: May 14, 2003
/s/ Lawrence D. McGovern
Lawrence D. McGovern
Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit Description
99.1 Certification of Registrant's Chief Executive Officer Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
99.2 Certification of Registrant's Chief Financial Officer Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350