Back to GetFilings.com




FORM 10-Q
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

|X| QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003

OR

|_| TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ________________ to ________________.


Commission File Number: 0 - 7261


CHAPARRAL RESOURCES, INC.
-------------------------
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Delaware 84-0630863
-------- ----------
(State or Other Jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
Incorporation or Organization)

16945 Northchase Drive, Suite 1620
Houston, Texas 77060
--------------------
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (281) 877-7100


Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.

YES |X| NO |_|

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as
defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

YES |_| NO |X|


As of August 8, 2003 the Registrant had 38,209,502 shares of its common
stock, par value $0.0001 per share, issued and outstanding.





Part I - Summarized Financial Information

Item 1 - Financial Statements

Chaparral Resources, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In Thousands)

June 30, December 31,
2003 2002
(Unaudited) (Audited)
--------- ---------

Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 4,132 $ 4,295
Accounts receivable:
Oil sales receivable 16 1,993
VAT receivable 2,165 1,999
Prepaid expenses 3,758 2,456
Prepaid corporate income taxes 1,524 --
Crude oil inventory 3,028 548
--------- ---------
Total current assets 14,623 11,291

Materials and supplies 2,562 2,457
Other 5 5
Property, plant and equipment:
Oil and gas properties, full cost:
Properties subject to depletion 95,693 84,833
Properties not subject to depletion 8,705 8,814
--------- ---------
104,398 93,647
Furniture and fixtures and other equipment 8,748 8,210
--------- ---------
113,146 101,857
Less - accumulated depreciation, depletion, and amortization (34,296) (28,302)
--------- ---------
Property, plant and equipment, net 78,850 73,555

Total assets $ 96,040 $ 87,308
========= =========


See accompanying notes.

2


Chaparral Resources, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets (continued)
(In Thousands)

June 30, December 31,
2003 2002
(Unaudited) (Audited)
--------- ---------
Liabilities and stockholders' equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable $ 7,888 $ 2,809
Accrued liabilities:
Accrued compensation 363 227
Prepaid revenue 4,054 --
Other accrued liabilities 2,312 2,432
Current income tax liability -- 1,939
Accrued interest payable 584 250
Current portion of loans payable to affiliates 8,433 6,000
--------- ---------
Total current liabilities 23,634 13,657

Loans payable to affiliates 25,127 27,998
Deferred tax liability 2,312 746
Long-term assets retirement obligation 616 --
Accrued production bonus 564 477
--------- ---------
Long-term liabilities 28,619 29,221
Minority interest 737 321
--------- ---------
Total liabilities 52,990 43,199
Stockholders' equity:
Common stock - authorized, 100,000,000 shares
of $0.0001 par value; issued and outstanding,
38,209,502 shares as of June 30, 2003 and
December 31, 2002 4 4
Capital in excess of par value 107,226 107,226
Accumulated deficit (64,180) (63,121)
--------- ---------
Total stockholders' equity 43,050 44,109
--------- ---------
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $ 96,040 $ 87,308
========= =========

See accompanying notes.

3


Chaparral Resources, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)
(In Thousands, Except Share Data)


For the Three Months Ended For the Six Months Ended
---------------------------- ----------------------------
June 30, June 30, June 30, June 30,
2003 2002 2003 2002
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------

Revenue $ 8,472 $ 10,646 $ 16,285 $ 19,025

Costs and expenses:
Transportation costs 1,641 2,382 3,304 4,631
Operating expenses 1,407 1,866 2,529 3,741
Depreciation and depletion 3,319 3,067 5,758 5,999
Advisory fee 150 -- 150 --
Hedge losses -- 64 -- 762
Accretion expense 15 -- 29 --
General and administrative 1,677 1,566 3,163 3,283
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Total costs and expenses 8,209 8,945 14,933 18,416
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Income from operations 263 1,701 1,352 609
Other income (expense):
Interest income 40 4 45 6
Interest expense (1,141) (1,603) (2,262) (3,352)
Minority interest 102 -- (416) --
Currency exchange loss (43) (100) (107) (154)
Loss on disposition of assets -- -- (8) --
Other -- 1 -- 1
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Total other income (expense) (1,042) (1,698) (2,748) (3,499)
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Loss before income taxes, extraordinary gain and
cumulative effect of change in accounting principle (779) 3 (1,396) (2,890)
Income tax expense (330) (287) (681) (519)
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Loss before extraordinary gain and cumulative effect
of change in accounting principle (1,109) (284) (2,077) (3,409)
Extraordinary gain -- 5,338 -- 5,338
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle,
net of tax -- -- 1,018 --
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Net income/(loss) available to common Stockholders $ (1,109) $ 5,054 $ (1,059) $ 1,929
============ ============ ============ ============

Basic earnings per share:
Loss per share before extraordinary gain and cumulative
effect of change in accounting principle $ (0.03) $ (0.01) $ (0.05) $ (0.16)
Extraordinary gain $ -- $ 0.19 $ -- $ 0.25
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle $ -- $ -- $ 0.03 $ --
Net income/(loss) per share $ (0.03) $ 0.18 $ (0.03) $ 0.09
Weighted average number of shares outstanding (basic) 38,209,502 27,955,630 38,209,502 21,157,483


4


Chaparral Resources, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Operations (continued) (Unaudited)
(In Thousands, Except Share Data)


For the Three Months Ended For the Six Months Ended
-------------------------- --------------------------
June 30, June 30, June 30, June 30,
2003 2002 2003 2002
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------

Diluted earnings per share:
Income/(loss) per share before extraordinary gain
and cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle $ (0.03) $ (0.01) $ (0.05) $ (0.16)
Extraordinary gain $ -- $ 0.19 $ -- $ 0.25
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle $ -- $ -- $ 0.03 $ --
Net income(/loss) per share $ (0.03) $ 0.18 $ (0.03) $ 0.09
Weighted number of shares outstanding (diluted) 38,209,635 28,488,711 38,209,635 21,430,647



See accompanying notes.



5


Chaparral Resources, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
(In Thousands)

For the Six Months Ended
------------------------
June 30, June 30,
2003 2002
-------- --------
Cash flows from operating activities
Net income/(loss) $ (1,059) $ 1,929
Adjustments to reconcile net income/(loss) to
Net cash provided/(used) in operating activities:
Depreciation, depletion, and amortization 5,758 5,999
Loss/(gain) on disposition of furniture and fixtures 8 (1)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting
Principle (1,018) --
Accretion expense 29 --
Hedge losses -- 762
Amortization of debt issuance costs 119 36
Extraordinary gain on restructuring of debt -- (5,338)
Non cash interest expense -- 2,753
Minority interest 416 --
Changes in assets and liabilities:
(Increase) decrease in:
Accounts receivable 1,811 (1,442)
Prepaid expenses (2,826) (293)
Crude oil inventory (694) (587)
Increase (decrease) in:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities 1,625 (4,717)
Prepaid revenue 4,054 --
Accrued interest payable 333 717
Other liabilities 88 103
-------- --------
Net cash provided/(used) in operating activities $ 8,644 $ (79)
-------- --------

Cash flows from investing activities
Additions to property, plant, and equipment $ (682) $ (207)
Acquisition of 10% interest in KKM, net of cash
required -- (644)
Additions to oil and gas properties (7,462) (4,473)
Materials and supplies inventory (106) 658
Proceeds from disposition of assets -- 5
-------- --------
Net cash used in investing activities $ (8,250) $ (4,661)
-------- --------

6


Chaparral Resources, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (continued) (Unaudited)
(In Thousands)

For the Six Months Ended
------------------------
June 30, June 30,
2003 2002
-------- --------
Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from loans from affiliates $ 1,500 $ 37,000
Payments on loans from affiliates (2,057) (2,000)
Proceeds from sale of stock -- 8,000
Payments on Shell Capital loan -- (30,350)
Debt restructuring costs -- (2,518)
Redemption of Series A Preferred Stock -- (2,300)
-------- --------
Net cash provided/(used) by financing activities $ (557) $ 7,832
-------- --------

Net increase (decrease) in cash and
cash equivalents $ (163) $ 3,092

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning
of period 4,295 174
-------- --------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 4,132 $ 3,266
-------- --------

Supplemental cash flow disclosure
Interest paid $ 2,114 $ 72


Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing and
financing activities
Non-cash additions to oil and gas properties $ 3,097 $ --
Common stock issued for 10% interest in KKM $ -- $ 2,701

Discount recognized for note issued with stock
warrants $ -- $ 2,466


See accompanying notes.

7



Chaparral Resources, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
(Unaudited)

1. General

Chaparral Resources, Inc. ("Chaparral") was incorporated in the state of
Colorado on January 13, 1972, principally to engage in the exploration,
development and production of oil and gas properties. Chaparral focuses
substantially all of its efforts on the exploration and development of the
Karakuduk Field, an oil field located in the Central Asian Republic of
Kazakhstan. In 1999, Chaparral reincorporated from Colorado to Delaware.

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Chaparral and its
greater than 50% owned subsidiaries, Closed Type JSC Karakudukmunay ("KKM"),
Central Asian Petroleum (Guernsey) Limited ("CAP-G"), Korporatsiya Mangistau
Terra International ("MTI"), Road Runner Services Company ("RRSC"), Chaparral
Acquisition Corporation ("CAC"), and Central Asian Petroleum, Inc. ("CAP-D").
Chaparral owns 80% of the common stock of CAP-G directly and 20% indirectly
through CAP-D. Hereinafter, Chaparral and its subsidiaries are collectively
referred to as the "Company." All significant inter-company transactions have
been eliminated.

Chaparral owns a 60% interest in KKM, a Kazakhstan Joint Stock Company of Closed
Type. KKM was formed to engage in the exploration, development, and production
of oil and gas properties in the Republic of Kazakhstan. KKM's only significant
investment is in the Karakuduk Field, an onshore oil field in the Mangistau
Oblast region of the Republic of Kazakhstan. On August 30, 1995, KKM entered
into an agreement with the Ministry of Oil and Gas Industry for Exploration,
Development and Production of Oil in the Karakuduk Oil Field in the Mangistau
Oblast Region of the Republic of Kazakhstan (the "Agreement"). KKM's rights and
obligations regarding the exploration, development, and production of underlying
hydrocarbons in the Karakuduk Field are determined by the Agreement. KKM is
owned jointly by CAP-G (50%), MTI (10%), and KazMunayGaz JSC ("KMG") (40%). KMG
is the national petroleum company of Kazakhstan.

KKM's rights to the Karakuduk Field may be terminated under certain conditions
specified in the Agreement. The term of the Agreement is 25 years commencing
from the date of KKM's registration. The Agreement can be extended to a date
agreed between the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources and KKM as long as
production of petroleum and/or gas is continued in the Karakuduk Field.

Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States have been condensed or omitted. Reference should be made to
the relevant notes to the financial statements for both Chaparral and KKM
included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2002.

The information furnished herein was taken from the books and records of the
Company without audit. However, such information reflects all adjustments, which
are, in the opinion of management, normal recurring adjustments necessary for
the fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented. The results
of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the
results to be expected for any future interim period or for the year.

Certain reclassifications have been made in the periods presented for the 2002
financial statements to conform to the 2003 presentation.

2. New Accounting Standards

In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement
Obligations. SFAS 143 requires entities to record the fair value of a liability
for an asset retirement obligation in the period in which it is incurred and a
corresponding increase in the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset.
Subsequently, the asset retirement cost should be allocated to expense using a
systematic and rational method. SFAS 143 is effective for fiscal years beginning
after June 15, 2002. The Company adopted SFAS 143 on January 1, 2003. See Note 6
for results of the adoption of SFAS 143.

8


Chaparral Resources, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
(Unaudited)

2. New Accounting Standards (continued)

In January 2003, the FASB issued FASB-Interpretation ("FIN") 46, Consolidation
of Variable Interest Entities (VIEs), in an effort to expand upon and strengthen
existing accounting guidance that addresses when a company should include in its
financial statements the assets, liabilities and activities of another entity.
In general, a VIE is a corporation, partnership, trust, or any other legal
structure used for business purposes that either (a) does not have equity
investors with voting rights or (b) has equity investors that do not provide
sufficient financial resources for the entity to support its activities. FIN 46
requires a VIE to be consolidated by a company if that company is subject to a
majority of the risk of loss from the VIE's activities, is entitled to receive a
majority of the VIE's residual returns, or both. FIN 46 also requires
disclosures about VIEs that the Company is not required to consolidate, but in
which it has a significant variable interest. The consolidation requirements of
FIN 46 apply immediately to variable interest entities created after January 31,
2003, and to other entities no later than the third quarter of 2003. Certain of
the disclosure requirements are required in all financial statements issued
after January 31, 2003, regardless of when the variable interest entity was
established. The Company has not identified any VIEs that must be consolidated.

3. Going Concern

The Company's financial statements have been presented on the basis that it is a
going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of
liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has a working capital
deficiency as of June 30, 2003. In addition, the Company has experienced
limitations in obtaining 100% export quota for the sale of its hydrocarbons.
These conditions create uncertainties relating to the Company's ability to meet
all expenditure and cash flow requirements through fiscal year 2003. These
conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a
going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments to
reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of
assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that may result from the
outcome of these uncertainties.

The Company has attempted, in accordance with the Agreement, to effect the 100%
export of all hydrocarbons produced from the Karakuduk Field through discussions
with the Government of Kazakhstan. The Company plans to continue to work with
the Government to increase its export quota. The Company, on July 17, 2003, took
the first step toward the commencement of arbitration proceedings in Switzerland
for the breach of the Agreement by the Government of Kazakhstan by initiating a
required three-month period of consultation with the Government. The Government
has indicated an interest in trying to resolve this matter during the
consultation period. However, no assurances can be provided that the matter will
be resolved successfully without arbitration, or that if arbitration is
instituted, it will be successful or that if successful, the Company will be
able to enforce the award in Kazakhstan, or that the Company will be able to
export 100% or a significant portion of its production and that the Company's
cash flow from operations will be sufficient to meet working capital
requirements in the future.

In addition, the Company is attempting to obtain additional debt financing to
cover any deficiencies which may occur in the short or long term, and refinance
the Company's loan with JSC Kazkommertsbank ("Kazkommertsbank") (See note 12) in
order to reduce the Company's current interest rate of 14% and alleviate the
Company's current working capital deficiency.

4. Crude Oil Inventory

Crude oil inventory represents production costs associated with lifting and
transporting crude oil from the Karakuduk Field to the KazTransOil pipeline.
Crude oil placed into the KazTransOil pipeline is held as inventory until
formally nominated and delivered for sale. Crude oil inventory as of June 30,
2003 represents approximately 381,000 barrels of crude oil, an increase of
294,000 barrels from 87,000 barrels of crude oil as of December 31, 2002. The
increase in crude oil inventory is mainly due to export sales of approximately
200,000 barrels contracted and approved for sale during June 2003, which were
not delivered to the buyer until early July 2003. The remaining 93,000 barrels
increase in crude oil inventory relates to export sales limitations imposed on
the Company during the period.

9


Chaparral Resources, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
(Unaudited)

5. Prepaid Revenue

Revenues and their related costs are recognized upon delivery of commercial
quantities of oil production produced from proved reserves, in accordance with
the accrual method of accounting. On June 16, 2003, the Company entered into a
short-term renewable crude oil sales agreement with Euro Asian Oil Company, Inc.
for the sale of 100% of the Company's June 2003 export quota approximately
200,000 barrels. A prepayment of $4.1 million was received on June 25, 2003 with
the remaining balance to be received after actual delivery of the oil has
occurred. The Company delivered the 200,000 barrels during July 2003 and
received an additional $200,000 on July 30, 2003 relating to this sale. The net
value of this sale amounted to approximately $4.3 million and will be recognized
as revenue in the month of July 2003.

6. Asset Retirement Obligation

As discussed in Note 2, effective January 1, 2003, the Company changed its
method of accounting for asset retirement obligations in accordance with FASB
Statement No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations. Previously, the
Company used an amount equal to the undiscounted cash flows associated with the
asset retirement obligation ("ARO") in determining depreciation, depletion, and
amortization ("DD&A") rates. Under the new accounting method, the Company now
recognizes asset retirement obligations in the period in which they are incurred
if a reasonable estimate of a fair value can be made. The associated asset
retirement costs are capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the
long-lived asset.

The cumulative effect of the change on prior years resulted in a gain of $1.02
million, or $0.03 per share, which is included in income for the period ended
June 30, 2003.

Since 1995, the business of Chaparral has been the development of the Karakuduk
Field. The Company is still in the early stages of development and continues to
develop the field by drilling additional wells, expansion of its oil storage
capacity, installation of additional gathering and processing facilities, and
the full implementation of the central processing facility. The Company is
legally required under the Agreement to restore the field to its original
condition. The Company recognized the fair value of its liability for an asset
retirement obligation as of January 1, 2003 in the amount of $516,000 and
capitalized that cost as part of the cost basis of its oil and gas properties
and depletes it using the units of production method over proved reserves.

On February 12, 2003, the Company commenced a new drilling campaign to further
develop and commercially produce the oil reserves in the Karakuduk Field. As a
result of the new drilling campaign, the Company revised its estimate of
retirement costs to include expected additions to the Karakuduk Field during
2003. This change in estimate did not result in any charge to income for the
period ended June 30, 2003. The following table describes all changes to the
Company's asset retirement obligation liability:

June 30,
2003
(In Thousands)
--------------
Asset retirement obligation at beginning of period $ --
Liability recognized in transition 516
Accretion expense 29
Revision in estimated cash flows 71
--------
Asset retirement obligation at end of period $ 616
========


10


Chaparral Resources, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
(Unaudited)

6. Asset Retirement Obligation (continued)

The pro forma effects of the application of SFAS 143 as if the Statement had
been adopted for periods prior to January 1, 2003 are presented below:

Pro forma amounts assuming the accounting change is applied retroactively. (In
Thousands, Except Share Data)

For the Three Months Ended For the Six Months Ended
---------------------------- ----------------------------
June 30, 2003 June 30, 2002 June 30, 2003 June 30, 2002
------------- ------------- ------------- -------------

Net income/(loss) $ (1,109) $ 5,178 $ (1,059) $ 2,177

Net income/(loss)
per common share $ (0.03) $ 0.19 $ (0.03) $ 0.10


7. Loans from Affiliates

CAIH Note
- ---------

In May 2002, the Company borrowed $4 million from Central Asian Industrial
Holdings, N.V. ("CAIH") in exchange for a three year note bearing interest at
12% per annum (the "CAIH Note"). Along with the CAIH Note, CAIH received a
warrant to purchase 3,076,923 shares of the Company's common stock at $1.30 per
share (the "CAIH Warrant"). The CAIH Note was recorded net of a $2.47 million
discount, based on the fair market value of the CAIH Warrant. The discount is
amortized using the effective interest rate over the life of the CAIH Note. The
principal balance of the CAIH Note is due on May 10, 2005 and accrued interest
is payable quarterly.

In June 2002, the Company prepaid $2 million of the $4 million outstanding
principal balance of the CAIH Note. As a result, the Company recognized an
extraordinary loss on the early extinguishment of debt of $1.22 million from the
write-off of 50% of the unamortized discount on the CAIH Note. The Company
recognized $236,000 in interest expense on the CAIH Note for the six months
ended June 30, 2003, including $118,000 of interest on outstanding principal and
$118,000 in discount amortization.

KKM Credit Facility
- -------------------

In May 2002, KKM established a five-year, $33 million credit line ("KKM Credit
Facility") with Kazkommertsbank an affiliate of CAIH. The KKM Credit Facility
consists of a $30 million non-revolving line and a $3 million revolving line,
both of which were fully borrowed by KKM in May 2002. The Company recognized
$2.32 million of interest expense on the KKM Credit Facility for the six months
ended June 30, 2003.

The non-revolving portion of the KKM Credit Facility accrues simple interest at
an annual rate of 14% and is repayable over a five-year period with final
maturity in May 2007. Accrued interest is payable quarterly, beginning in
December 2002. KKM is making quarterly principal payments since May 2003. As of
June 30, 2003, the Company has repaid $557,000 as principal payments.

The revolving portion of the KKM Credit Facility accrues simple interest at an
annual rate of 14%. The revolver is loaned to KKM for short-term periods up to
one year, but KKM has the right to re-borrow the funds through May 2006 with
final repayment due in May 2007. Accrued interest on the revolving loan is
payable at maturity. The initial $3 million revolving loan to KKM was subject to
a three month term. The principal balance was repaid in July 2002 and KKM
immediately re-borrowed another $3 million with a maturity date of July 31,
2003. As of August 8, 2003, KKM has repaid the $3 million due on July 31, 2003
and exercised its right to re-borrow another $3 million with a maturity date of
July 31, 2004.

11


Chaparral Resources, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
(Unaudited)

7. Loans from Affiliates (continued)

The original KKM Credit Facility included repayment terms of three years and
four years for the non-revolving and revolving portions of the KKM Credit
Facility, respectively, with an option to extend the final maturity date for
repayment of the entire KKM Credit Facility to five years. KKM exercised the
option to extend the repayment term to five years for the entire KKM Credit
Facility from May 2002.

The Company is subject to certain pledges, covenants, and other restrictions
under the KKM Credit Facility, including, but not limited to, the following:

(i) CAP-G pledged its 50% interest in KKM to Kazkommertsbank as
collateral for the KKM Credit Facility;
(ii) Chaparral has provided a written guarantee to Kazkommertsbank that it
will repay the KKM Credit Facility in the event KKM fails do so;
(iii) KKM may not incur additional indebtedness or pledge its assets to
another party without the written consent of Kazkommertsbank; and
(iv) KKM may not pay dividends without the written consent of
Kazkommertsbank.


The KKM Credit Facility stipulates certain events of default, including, but not
limited to, KKM's inability to meet the terms of the KKM Credit Facility, KKM's
failure to meet it obligations to third parties in excess of $100,000, and the
Company's involvement in legal proceedings in excess of $100,000 where an
adverse judgment against the Company occurs or is expected to occur. If an event
of default does occur and is not waived by the lender, Kazkommertsbank has a
right to call the KKM Credit Facility immediately due and payable and/or
exercise its security interest by enforcing its collateral right on the
Company's shares in KKM. Furthermore, in the event of a material adverse change
in the financial or credit markets, Kazkommertsbank has a right to unilaterally
alter any terms and conditions of the KKM Credit Facility, including the rate of
interest, by written request. KKM may either agree to the amended terms or repay
the outstanding KKM Credit Facility within 10 days of notification.

The maturity schedule of the Company's indebtedness as of June 30, 2003, is as
follows:

Principal
Date Amount Due
--------------------------
2003 $ 5,443,333
2004 7,000,000
2005 10,000,000
2006 8,000,000
2007 4,000,000
--------------------------
Total $34,443,333

Line of Credit
- --------------

On April 29, 2003, Kazkommertsbank provided a line of credit for $2.5 million to
the Company to cover necessary operating expenditures ("Line of Credit"). On the
same day, the Company accessed $1.5 million from the line of credit to cover the
required transportation costs for the May 2003 oil sale. The $1.5 million was
due on May 29, 2003 and accrued simple interest at an annual rate of 14%. The
company repaid the $1.5 million on May 22, 2003.

8. Common Stock

During the quarter ended June 30, 2003, stock options to purchase 333 shares of
the Company's common stock granted in 1998 to employees of the Company expired.
The expired options had an exercise price of $127.20 per share.

12


Chaparral Resources, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
(Unaudited)

9. Income Taxes

Income tax expense as reported entirely relates to foreign income taxes provided
on the Company's operations within the Republic of Kazakhstan. KKM's principal
agreement with the Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan for the exploration,
development and production of oil in the Karakuduk Field specifies the income
taxes and other taxes applicable to KKM, which is subject to the tax laws of the
Republic of Kazakhstan. The Company has used the best estimates available to
determine its current and deferred tax liabilities within Kazakhstan.

10. Commitments and Contingencies

Taxation
- --------

The existing legislation with regard to taxation in the Republic of Kazakhstan
is constantly evolving as the Government manages the transition from a command
to a market economy. Tax and other laws applicable to the Company are not always
clearly written and their interpretation is often subject to the opinions of the
local or main State Tax Service. Instances of inconsistent opinions between
local, regional and national tax authorities are not unusual.

In December 2002, KKM received a claim from the Ministry of State Revenues of
the Republic of Kazakhstan for $9.6 million (the "Tax Claim") relating to
additional unpaid taxes and penalties covering the three years from 1999 to
2001. The original Tax Claim has been successfully reduced to approximately
$2.31 million. KKM has appealed the remaining claim and has contracted legal
firms in Kazakhstan to assist with the appeal process. Based on the assessments
of KKM's management and legal counsel, it is the Company's opinion that the
ultimate resolution of the Tax Claim, after taking into account reserves
previously made, will not have a material adverse effect on the financial
position or operating results of the Company.

Basis of Accounting
- -------------------

KKM maintains its statutory books and records in accordance with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles ("GAAP") and calculates taxable income or loss
using the existing Kazakh tax legislation in effect on August 30, 1995, the date
the Agreement was signed. The Company considers these accounting methods correct
under the terms of the Agreement. The Republic of Kazakhstan currently requires
companies to comply with Kazakh accounting regulations and to calculate tax
profits or losses in accordance with these regulations as well as the prevailing
tax law.

11. Related Party Transactions

During April 2003, the Company approved a one-year agreement with OJSC
Kazkommerts Securities ("KKS") an affiliate of Kazkommertsbank, The agreement is
effective as of January 7, 2003 and provides for KKS to assist the Company's
senior management with financial advisory and investment banking services. In
consideration for the services KKS will receive a monthly fee of $25,000 (the
"Advisory Fee").

12. Subsequent Events

As stated in Note 3, the Company is attempting to obtain additional debt
financing to cover any short-term working capital deficiencies and refinance the
KKM Credit Facility. The Company has signed a discussion term sheet with KBC
Bank N.V. ("KBC") regarding a possible $40 million pre-export finance facility
("KBC Loan"). The transaction is subject to a number of conditions precedent,
including: (i) the approval of Kazkommertsbank, (ii) the negotiation and
execution of a definitive agreement with KBC and the approval of their credit
committee, (ii) and the approval of the boards of directors and shareholders of
both companies. The Company plans to use the capital infusion from KBC to
restructure the KKM Credit Facility with Kazkommertsbank and resolve the
Company's current working capital deficiencies.

13


Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations

1. Liquidity and Capital Resources

Going Concern
- -------------

Our financial statements have been presented on the basis that it is a going
concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of
liabilities in the normal course of business. We have a working capital
deficiency as of June 30, 2003. In addition, we have experienced limitations in
obtaining 100% export quota for the sale of our hydrocarbons. These conditions
create uncertainties relating to our ability to meet all expenditure and cash
flow requirements through fiscal year 2003. These conditions raise substantial
doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements
do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the
recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of
liabilities that may result from the outcome of these uncertainties.

Our short and long-term liquidity is impacted by local oil sales obligations on
oil and gas producers within Kazakhstan to supply local energy needs, and our
ability to obtain export quota necessary to sell our crude oil production on the
international market. Under the terms of our Agreement, we have a right to
export, and receive export quota for, 100% of the production from the Karakuduk
Field. The domestic market does not permit world market prices to be obtained,
resulting in approximately $10 to $12 less cash flow per barrel. Furthermore,
the Government has not allocated sufficient export quota to allow us to sell all
of our available crude oil production on the world market. We are taking steps
to reduce our local market obligations and to obtain an export quota that will
enable us to sell all of our crude oil production. These steps include
continuing to work with the Government to increase our export quota. The
Company, on July 17, 2003, took the first step toward the commencement of
arbitration proceedings in Switzerland for the breach of the Agreement by the
Government of Kazakhstan by initiating a required three-month period of
consultation with the Government. The Government has indicated an interest in
trying to resolve this matter during the consultation period. However, no
assurances can be provided that the matter will be resolved successfully without
arbitration, or that if arbitration is instituted, it will be successful or that
if successful, the Company will be able to enforce the award in Kazakhstan, or
that the Company will be able to export 100% or a significant portion of its
production and that the Company's cash flow from operations will be sufficient
to meet working capital requirements in the future, which may require the
Company to seek additional debt or equity financing in order to continue to
develop the Karakuduk Field.

The Company has been successful in 2003 in increasing its export quotas and
reducing its local market obligations. As of August 8, 2003, the Company has
sold approximately 1,289,000 barrels of its current year production, of which
approximately 1,265,000 barrels, or 98%, have been sold at world market prices
and 24,000 barrels, or 2%, have been sold at domestic market prices. A
significant decrease in local market sales from the 15% sold at domestic market
prices during 2002.

In addition, the Company is attempting to obtain additional debt financing to
cover any short-term working capital deficiencies (See Note 12).

Karakuduk Field Operations
- --------------------------

We are presently engaged in the development of the Karakuduk Field, which
requires substantial cash expenditures for drilling, well completions,
workovers, oil storage and processing facilities, pipelines, gathering systems,
plant and equipment (generators, pumps, communications, etc.) and other field
facilities. We expect to finance the continued development of the Karakuduk
Field primarily through cash flows from the sale of crude oil. Our short-term
operational priorities will have a high probability of increasing our daily
production levels through the use of the following proven methods: (i) water
injection, (ii) down-hole pumps, (iii) hydraulic fracturing, and (iv) further
drilling. Accordingly, management expects the Karakuduk Field production to
increase approximately 25% from its current level of approximately 10,000
barrels of oil per day to in excess of 12,000 barrels of oil per day by
year-end.

In 2003, KKM has made considerable improvements with respect to reservoir
management by maintaining an active drilling program, installing artificial lift
support, and establishing a good fracture stimulation record. The activities in
these areas to date are in line with expectations and will continue. Production

14


from the Karakuduk Field is expected to increase further due to: (i) the
introduction of additional new wells, (ii) the ongoing hydraulic fracturing
program, (iii) the ongoing installation of down hole and (iv) the implementation
of a water injection program. As of August 8, 2003, we have successfully
increased our daily production to approximately 10,000 barrels from 6,000
barrels per day as of December 31, 2002, an increase of approximately 67%.

KKM has successfully completed every well drilled to date. In February, 2003, we
started an aggressive drilling program. As of August 8, 2003, we have drilled 8
new wells, 5 of which have been completed, with 7 more expected to be completed
by year-end. This will increase our total well stock to 48 wells by year-end.
The 8 wells drilled during 2003 have been drilled to depths between 10,500 feet
(3,200 meters) and 11,300 feet (3,450 meters) accessing zones J1, J3, and J7.
Karakuduk Well No. 159, was spudded on July 12, 2003 and was drilled to a depth
of 10,512 feet (3,204 meters) in less than 9 days, a new Karakuduk Field
drilling record.

The positive oil rate response following hydraulic fractures in three wells
(Nos. 101, 158, and 186) is an indication that other wells will benefit in a
similar fashion. We intend to expand the hydraulic fracturing program by
effecting up to 8 additional fractures before year-end. The timing of this
program will be dependent upon contractor availability.

The water injection plan for the second half of 2003 includes injection into a
total of 5 wells. Management is optimistic that the water injection plan will
maintain current production levels and increase proven reserves. Actual changes
in reserve estimates will be realized during the year-end reserves determination
process.

Capital Commitments and Other Contingencies
- -------------------------------------------

Our operations may be subject to regulations or other restrictions instituted by
the Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan or other regulatory bodies
responsible for the area in which the Karakuduk Field is located. In addition to
taxation, customs declarations and environmental controls, regulations may
govern such things as export quotas, local oil sales requirements, and
commissioning and approval of surface production facilities. It is possible
these regulations may limit the amount of revenue and cash flow obtainable from
crude oil production and sales, increase the costs of doing business, and/or
prevent or delay the starting or continuation of any given exploration or
development project.

All regulations are subject to future changes by legislative and administrative
action and by judicial decisions. Such changes could adversely affect the entire
petroleum industry. It is virtually impossible to predict the effect that any
current or future proposals or changes in existing laws or regulations will have
on our operations.

2. Results from Operations

Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2003 Compared to the
Three Months Ended June 30, 2002
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Our operations for the three months ended June 30, 2003 resulted in a net loss
of $1.11 million compared to a net income of $5.05 million as of June 30, 2002.
The $6.16 million decrease in our net income primarily relates to (i) lower
quantities of oil sold, (ii) a $5.34 million extraordinary gain recognized in
May 2002 as a result of the restructuring of our loan with Shell Capital Inc.,
in part offset by (iii) lower costs associated with the refinancing of our debt
obligations with Shell Capital, Inc., (iv) lower operating costs, (v) expiration
of the hedge agreement during 2002, and (vi) improved operational results from
the Karakuduk Field.

Revenue. Revenues were $8.47 million for the second quarter of 2003 compared
with $10.65 million for the second quarter of 2002. The $2.17 million decrease
is the result of lower volumes sold during the second quarter 2003 net of higher
oil prices received during the second quarter 2003. The reduction of volumes
sold was the result of delay of delivery of approximately 200,000 barrels of
oil, contracted during June 2003, until July 2003. The net value of this sale
amounted to approximately $4.3 million and will be recognized as revenue in the
month of July 2003. See Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. During
the second quarter 2003, we sold approximately 455,000 barrels of crude oil,
recognizing $8.47 million, or $18.62 per barrel, in revenue. Comparably, we sold
approximately 579,000 barrels of crude oil, recognizing $10.65 million in
revenue, or $18.39 per barrel, for the second quarter 2002.

15


Transportation and Operating expenses. Transportation costs for the second
quarter 2003 were $1.64 million, or $3.61 per barrel, and operating costs
associated with sales were $1.41 million, or $3.09 per barrel. Comparatively,
transportation costs for the second quarter 2002 were $2.38 million, or $4.11
per barrel, and operating costs associated with sales were $1.87 million, or
$3.22 per barrel. The decrease in transportation and operating cost is mainly
due to lower quantities of oil sold during the second quarter 2003 and lower
operating cost per barrel.

Depreciation and Depletion. Depreciation and depletion expense were $3.32
million for the second quarter of 2003 compared with $3.07 million for the
second quarter of 2002. The $252,000 increase is the result of higher effective
depletion rates during the second quarter 2003. During the second quarter 2003,
the Company recognized a total depletion expense of $3.13 million or $6.89 per
barrel, compared to $2.86 million or $4.94 per barrel in depletion expense for
the second quarter 2002. The increase in the effective depletion rate of $1.75
per barrel is due to increased capital expenditures for the development of the
field for future years and reductions to the Company's estimated proved
reserves.

Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased from $1.60 million for the second
quarter 2002 to $1.14 million for the second quarter 2003, due to the lower
financing costs of our restructured indebtedness. The Company's cost of
financing the development of the Karakuduk Field has improved from a
pre-restructuring annual interest rate of LIBOR plus 19.75% compounded daily, to
a simple fixed annual interest rate of 14%, generating savings of approximately
$600,000 per quarter. In addition, interest expense for the quarter ended June
30, 2003 reflects an additional loan discount of $59,000 and is net of
capitalized interest of $152,000.

General and Administrative Expense. General and administrative costs increased
from $1.57 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002 to $1.68 million for
the three months ended June 30, 2003. The $110,000 change is the result of
increased operating activities in the development of the Karakuduk Field net of
cost reduction activities implemented by the Company.

Results of Operations for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2003 Compared to the Six
Months Ended June 30, 2002
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Our operations for the six months ended June 30, 2003 resulted in a net loss of
$1.06 million compared to a net profit of $1.93 million as of June 30, 2002. The
$2.99 million decrease in our net income primarily relates to (i) lower sales
revenue as a result of lower volumes sold, (ii) a $5.34 million extraordinary
gain recognized as a result of the May 2002 restructuring of our loan with Shell
Capital Inc., in part offset by (iii) recognition of a $1.02 gain as a result of
the adoption of SFAS 143, (iv) lower costs associated with the refinancing of
our debt obligations with Shell Capital, Inc., (v) expiration of the hedge
agreement during 2002 (vi) improved operational results from the Karakuduk
Field, and (vii) lower operational costs associated with reduced sales.

Revenue. Revenues were $16.29 million for the six months ended 2003 compared
with $19.03 million for the six months ended 2002. The $2.74 million decrease is
the result of lower oil sales volumes sold during the six months ended 2003 net
of higher oil prices received during the six months ended 2003. The reduction of
volumes sold was the result of deferral of delivery of approximately 200,000
barrels of oil, contracted during June 2003, until July 2003. The net value of
this sale amounted to approximately $4.3 million and will be recognized as
revenue in the month of July 2003. See Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements. During the six months ended 2003, we sold approximately 819,000
barrels of crude oil, recognizing $16.29 million, or $19.89 per barrel, in
revenue. Comparably, we sold approximately 1,150,000 barrels of crude oil,
recognizing $19.03 million in revenue, or $16.54 per barrel, for the six months
ended 2002. The result is a positive price variance of $2.74 million net of a
negative volume variance of $5.48 million.

Transportation and Operating expenses. Transportation costs for the six months
ended 2003 were $3.30 million, or $4.03 per barrel, and operating costs
associated with sales were $2.53 million, or $3.09 per barrel. Comparatively,
transportation costs for the six months ended 2002 were $4.63 million, or $4.03
per barrel, and operating costs associated with sales were $3.74 million, or
$3.25 per barrel. The decrease in operating cost is mainly due to lower
operating cost per barrel due to increase efficiencies in our operations.

Depreciation and Depletion. Depreciation and depletion expense were $5.76
million for the six months ended of 2003 compared with $6 million for the six
months ended of 2002. The $241,000 decrease is the result of lower oil volumes

16


sold net of higher effective depletion rates during the six months ended 2003.
During the six months ended 2003, the Company recognized a total depletion
expense of $5.38 million or $6.57 per barrel, compared to $5.59 million or $4.86
per barrel in depletion expense for the six months ended 2002. The increase in
the effective depletion rate of $1.71 per barrel is due to increased capital
expenditures for the development of the field for future years and reductions to
the Company's estimated proved reserves.

Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased from $3.35 million for the six
months ended 2002 to $2.26 million for the six months ended 2003. The $1.09
million decrease is due to the lower financing costs of our restructured
indebtedness. The Company's cost of financing the development of the Karakuduk
Field has improved from a pre-restructuring annual interest rate of LIBOR plus
19.75% compounded daily, to a simple fixed annual interest rate of 14%,
generating savings of approximately $600,000 per quarter. In addition, interest
expense for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 reflects an additional loan discount
of $118,000 and is net of capitalized interest of $306,000.

General and Administrative Expense. General and administrative costs decreased
from $3.28 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002 to $3.16 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2003. The $120,000 change was due to the impact of
cost reduction initiatives by Chaparral to reduce overhead expenses implemented
during the fourth quarter of 2002, net of by increased operating activity.

Cumulative effect of change in accounting principal. As a result of the adoption
of SFAS 143, the Company recognized a gain of $1.02 million as a cumulative
effect of change in accounting principal for the six months ended 2003. In
addition, the Company recognized $29,000 in accretion expense to account for
changes in the ARO liability. See Note 6 of our consolidated financial
statements.

3. Commodity Prices for Oil and Gas

Our revenues, profitability, growth and value are highly dependent upon the
price of oil. Market conditions make it difficult to estimate prices of oil or
the impact of inflation on such prices. Oil prices have been volatile, and it is
likely they will continue to fluctuate in the future. Various factors beyond our
control affect prices for oil, including supplies of oil available worldwide and
in Kazakhstan, the ability of OPEC to agree to maintain oil prices and
production controls, political instability or armed conflict in Kazakhstan or
other oil producing regions, the price of foreign imports, the level of consumer
demand, the price and availability of alternative fuels, the availability of
transportation routes and pipeline capacity, and changes in applicable laws and
regulations.

4. Inflation

We cannot control prices received from our oil sales and to the extent we are
unable to pass on increases in operating costs, we may be affected by inflation.
The devaluation of the Tenge, the currency of the Republic of Kazakhstan, can
significantly decrease the value of the monetary assets that we hold in
Kazakhstan as well as our assets in that country that are based on the Tenge.
KKM retains the majority of its cash and cash equivalents in U.S. dollars, but
KKM's statutory tax basis in its assets, tax loss carryforwards, and VAT
receivables are all denominated in Tenge and subject to the effects of
devaluation. Local tax laws allow basis adjustments to offset the impact of
inflation on statutory tax basis assets, but there is no assurance that any
adjustments will be sufficient to offset the effects of inflation in whole or in
part. If not, KKM may be subject to much higher income tax liabilities within
Kazakhstan due to inflation and or devaluation of the local currency.
Additionally, devaluation may create uncertainty with respect to the future
business climate in Kazakhstan and to our investment in that country. As of June
30, 2003, the exchange rate was 148.00 Tenge per U.S. Dollar.

5. Critical Accounting Policies

Application of GAAP requires the use of estimates, judgments and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the
financial statements and revenues and expenses during the reporting period. In
addition, alternatives can exist among various accounting methods. In such
cases, the choice of accounting method can also have a significant impact on
reported amounts.

17


Our determination of proved oil and gas reserve quantities, the application of
the full cost method of accounting for exploration and production activities,
and the application of standards of accounting for derivative instruments and
hedging activities require management to make numerous estimates and judgments.

Oil and Gas properties (Full Cost Method). The Company follows the full cost
method of accounting for oil and gas properties. Accordingly, all costs
associated with the acquisition, exploration, and development of oil and gas
reserves, including directly related overhead costs, are capitalized.

All capitalized costs of proved oil and gas properties, including the estimated
future costs to develop proved reserves, are amortized on the unit-of-production
method using estimated proved reserves. Investments in unproved properties and
major development projects are not amortized until proved reserves associated
with the projects can be determined or until impairment occurs. If the results
of an assessment indicate that the properties are impaired, the amount of the
impairment is added to the capitalized cost to be amortized.

Sales of proved and unproved properties are accounted for as adjustments of
capitalized costs with no gain or loss recognized, unless such adjustments would
significantly alter the relationship between capitalized costs and proved
reserves of oil and gas, in which case the gain or loss is recognized in income.
Abandonments of properties are accounted for as adjustments of capitalized costs
with no loss recognized.

Cost Excluded. Oil and gas properties include costs that are excluded from
capitalized costs being amortized. These amounts represent costs of investments
in unproved properties and major development projects. The Company excludes
these costs until proved reserves are found or until it is determined that the
costs are impaired. All costs excluded are reviewed quarterly to determine if
impairment has occurred. Any impairment is transferred to the costs to be
amortized. For operations where a reserve base has not yet been established, an
impairment requiring a charge to earnings may be indicated through evaluation of
drilling results or relinquishing drilling rights.

Capitalized Interest. SFAS 34, Capitalization of Interest Costs, provides
standards for the capitalization of interest costs as part of the historical
cost of acquiring assets. FIN 33 provides guidance for the application of SFAS
34 to the full cost method of accounting for oil and gas properties. Under FIN
33, costs of investments in unproved properties and major development projects,
on which DD&A expense is not currently taken and on which exploration or
development activities are in progress, qualify for capitalization of interest.
Capitalized interest is calculated by multiplying the weighted-average interest
rate on debt by the amount of costs excluded. Capitalized interest cannot exceed
gross interest expense.

Ceiling Test. Companies that use the full cost method of accounting for oil and
gas exploration and development activities are required to perform a ceiling
test each quarter. The full cost ceiling test is an impairment test prescribed
by SEC Regulation S-X Rule 4-10. The ceiling test is performed on a
country-by-country basis. The test determines a limit, or ceiling, on the book
value of oil and gas properties. That limit is basically the after tax present
value of the future net cash flows from proved crude oil and natural gas
reserves. This ceiling is compared to the net book value of the oil and gas
properties reduced by any related deferred income tax liability. If the net book
value reduced by the related deferred income taxes exceeds the ceiling, an
impairment or non-cash write down is required. A ceiling test impairment can
give the Company a significant loss for a particular period, however, future
DD&A expense would be reduced.

Reserves. Estimates of our proved oil and gas reserves are prepared by Ryder
Scott Company in accordance with guidelines established by the SEC. Those
guidelines require that reserve estimates be prepared under existing economic
and operating conditions with no provisions for increases in commodity prices,
except by contractual arrangement. Estimation of oil and gas reserve quantities
is inherently difficult and is subject to numerous uncertainties. Such
uncertainties include the projection of future rates of production, export
allocation, and the timing of development expenditures. The accuracy of the
estimates depends on the quality of available geological and geophysical data
and requires interpretation and judgment. Estimates may be revised either upward
or downward by results of future drilling, testing or production. In addition,
estimates of volumes considered to be commercially recoverable fluctuate with
changes in commodity prices and operating costs. Our estimates of reserves are
expected to change as additional information becomes available.

18


Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities. We account for our
investment in derivative financial instruments in accordance with SFAS 133,
Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities, as
amended. As a result, we recognize all derivative financial instruments in our
financial statements at fair value, regardless of the purpose or intent for
holding the instrument. Changes in the fair value of derivative financial
instruments are recognized periodically in income or in shareholders' equity as
a component of comprehensive income depending on whether the derivative
financial instrument qualifies for hedge accounting, and if so, whether it
qualifies as a fair value hedge or cash flow hedge. Generally, changes in fair
values of derivatives accounted for as fair value hedges are recorded in income
along with the portions of the changes in the fair values of the hedged items
that relate to the hedged risks. Changes in fair values of derivatives accounted
for as cash flow hedges, to the extent they are effective as hedges, are
recorded in other comprehensive income net of deferred taxes. Changes in fair
values of derivatives not qualifying as hedges are reported in income.

Legal, Environmental and Other Contingencies. A provision for legal,
environmental and other contingencies is charged to expense when the loss is
probable and the cost can be reasonably estimated. Determining when expenses
should be recorded for these contingencies and the appropriate amounts for
accrual is a complex estimation process that includes the subjective judgment of
management. In many cases, management's judgment is based on interpretation of
laws and regulations, which can be interpreted differently by regulators and/or
courts of law. Chaparral's management closely monitors known and potential
legal, environmental and other contingencies and periodically determines when
Chaparral should record losses for these items based on information available to
us.

6. Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

Some of the statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q constitute
"forward-looking statements." Forward-looking statements relate to future events
or our future financial performance. In some cases, you can identify
forward-looking statements by terminology such as "may," "will," "should,"
"expects," "plans," "estimates," "believes," "predicts," "potential," "likely,"
or "continue," or by the negative of such terms or comparable terminology.
Forward-looking statements are predictions based on current expectations that
involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Actual events may differ
materially. In evaluating forward-looking statements, you should consider
various factors, including the risks discussed above. These factors may cause
our actual results to differ materially from any forward-looking statement.

Although we believe that these statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee
future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements, and you are
encouraged to exercise caution in considering such forward-looking statements.
Unless otherwise required by law, we are not under any duty to update any of the
forward-looking statements after the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
to conform these statements to actual results.

Item 3 - Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risks

Foreign Currency

The functional currency is the U.S. Dollar. All transactions arising in
currencies other than U.S. dollars, including assets, liabilities, revenue,
expenses, gains, or losses are measured and recorded into U.S. dollars using the
exchange rate in effect on the date of the transaction.

Cash and other monetary assets held and liabilities denominated in currencies
other than U.S. dollars are translated at exchange rates prevailing as of the
balance sheet date (148.00 and 155.60 Kazakh Tenge per U.S. Dollar as of June
30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively). Non-monetary assets and
liabilities denominated in currencies other than U.S. dollars have been
translated at the estimated historical exchange rate prevailing on the date of
the transaction. Exchange gains and losses arising from translation of non-U.S.
dollar amounts at the balance sheet date are recognized as an increase or
decrease in income for the period.

The devaluation of the Tenge, the currency of the Republic of Kazakhstan, can
significantly decrease the value of the monetary assets that we hold in
Kazakhstan as well as our assets in that country that are based on the Tenge.
KKM retains the majority of cash and cash equivalents in U.S. dollars in bank
accounts within Kazakhstan, but KKM's statutory tax basis in its assets, tax
loss carryforwards, and VAT receivables are all denominated in Tenge and subject

19


to the effects of devaluation. Local tax laws allow basis adjustments to offset
the impact of inflation on statutory tax basis assets, but there is no assurance
that any adjustments will be sufficient to offset the effects of inflation in
whole or in part. If not, KKM may be subject to much higher income tax
liabilities within Kazakhstan due to inflation and/or devaluation of the local
currency. Additionally, devaluation may create uncertainty with respect to the
future business climate in Kazakhstan and to our investment in that country.

The Tenge is not a convertible currency outside of the Republic of Kazakhstan.
The translation of Tenge denominated assets and liabilities in these financial
statements does not indicate Chaparral could realize or settle these assets and
liabilities in U.S. dollars.

Commodity Prices for Oil

Our revenues, profitability, growth and value are highly dependent upon the
price of oil. Market conditions make it difficult to estimate prices of oil or
the impact of inflation on such prices. Oil prices have been volatile, and it is
likely they will continue to fluctuate in the future. Various factors beyond our
control affect prices for oil, including requirements to supply a portion of our
crude oil production to the Kazakhstan local market to meet domestic energy
needs, supplies of oil available worldwide and in Kazakhstan, the ability of
OPEC to agree to maintain oil prices and production controls, political
instability or armed conflict in Kazakhstan or other oil producing regions, the
price of foreign imports, the level of consumer demand, the price and
availability of alternative fuels, the availability of transportation routes and
pipeline capacity, and changes in applicable laws and regulations.

Item 4 - Controls and Procedures

An evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company's
disclosure controls and procedures conducted within 90 days of the date of
filing this Form 10-Q, was carried out by the Chief Executive Officer ("CEO")
and Chief Financial Officer ("CFO"). Based on that evaluation, the CEO and CFO
concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures have been
designed and are being operated in a manner that provides reasonable assurance
that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports filed
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms. A
controls system, no matter how well designed and operated, cannot provide
absolute assurance that the objectives of the controls system are met, and no
evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues
and instances of fraud, if any, within an entity have been detected. Subsequent
to the date of the most recent evaluation of the Company's internal controls,
there were no significant changes in Chaparral's internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect the internal controls, including any
corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses.

Part II- Other Information

Item 1 - Legal Proceedings

In December 2002, KKM received a claim from the Ministry of State Revenues of
the Republic of Kazakhstan for $9.6 million (the "Tax Claim") relating to
additional unpaid taxes and penalties covering the three years from 1999 to
2001. The original Tax Claim has been successfully reduced to approximately
$2.31 million. KKM has appealed the remaining claim and has contracted legal
firms in Kazakhstan to assist with the appeal process. Based on the assessments
of KKM's management and legal counsel, it is the Company's opinion that the
ultimate resolution of the Tax Claim, after taking into account reserves
previously made, will not have a material adverse effect on the financial
position or operating results of the Company.

20


Item 6 - Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

(a) Exhibits

Number Exhibit
------ -------
10.1 Service Agreement, dated January 7, 2003, between Chaparral
Resources, Inc. and OJSC Kazkommerts Securities

(b) Reports on Form 8-K

None.






21




Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Dated: August 14, 2003



Chaparral Resources, Inc.


By: /s/ Nikolai D. Klinchev
--------------------------------
Nikolai D. Klinchev
Chief Executive Officer



By: /s/ Richard J. Moore
--------------------------------
Richard J. Moore,
VP Finance and Chief Financial
Officer (Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer)



22


Certifications

I, Nikolai D. Klinchev, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Chaparral Resources,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date: August 14, 2003 /s/ Nikolai D. Klinchev
-----------------------
Nikolai D. Klinchev
Chief Executive Officer

23


I, Richard J. Moore, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Chaparral Resources,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date: August 14, 2003 /s/ Richard J. Moore
--------------------
Richard J. Moore
Chief Financial Officer

24