UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
DC 20549
FORM
10-K
(Mark
One)
x |
Annual
Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934
For
the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2004 |
|
OR |
|
|
o |
Transition
Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934
For
the Transition period from___________ to
___________ |
Commission
File Number: 0-23605
|
(Exact
Name of Registrant as Specified in Its
Charter) |
Tennessee |
62-1721072 |
(State
or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) |
(I.R.S.
Employer I.D. Number) |
114
West College Street, Murfreesboro, Tennessee |
37130 |
(Address
of Principal Executive Offices) |
(Zip
Code) |
(615)
893-1234 |
Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code |
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:Common
Stock, no par value per share
(Title of
Class)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days.
Indicate
by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendments to
this Form 10-K. X
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in
Exchange Act Rule 12b-2)
The
aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the
registrant, based on the closing sales price of the registrant's Common Stock as
quoted on the NASDAQ National Market System under the symbol “CAVB” on June 30,
2004, was $77,995,655 (4,936,434 shares at $15.80 per share). It is assumed for
purposes of this calculation that the registrant's directors are its
affiliates.
The
number of shares outstanding of registrant’s common stock as of March 11, 2005
was 7,217,565.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
1.
Portions of Annual Report to Stockholders for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31,
2004 (“Annual Report”) (Parts I and II).
2.
Portions of Definitive Proxy Statement for the 2005 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders (Part III).
PART
I
Item
1. Business
Safe
Harbor Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995
This
report contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section
27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The Company intends such forward-looking
statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking
statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995,
and is including this statement for purposes of this safe harbor.
Forward-looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and describe
future plans, strategies and expectations of the Company, are generally
identifiable by use of the words “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “anticipate,”
“estimate,” “project” or similar expressions. The Company’s ability to predict
results or the actual effect of future plans or strategies is inherently
uncertain. Factors which could have a material adverse affect on the operations
and future prospects of the Company and its subsidiaries include, but are not
limited to, changes in: interest rates, general economic conditions,
legislative/regulatory changes, monetary and fiscal policies of the U. S.
Government, including policies of the U. S. Treasury and the Federal Reserve
Board, the quality or composition of the loan or investment portfolios, demand
for loan products, deposit flows, competition, demand for financial services in
the Company’s market area, implementation of new technologies, the Company’s
ability to develop and maintain secure and reliable electronic systems and
accounting principles, policies and guidelines. These risks and uncertainties
should be considered in evaluating forward-looking statements and undue reliance
should not be placed on such statements.
General
Cavalry
Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”), a Tennessee corporation, was organized on
November 5, 1997 for the purpose of becoming the holding company for Cavalry
Banking (the “Bank”) upon the Bank's conversion from a federally chartered
mutual to a federally chartered stock savings bank (the “Conversion”). The
Conversion was completed on March 16, 1998. In January 2002, the Bank converted
to a state chartered commercial bank and became a member of the Federal Reserve
System. As of that date, the Company became a bank holding company registered
with the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (“FRB”). At December
31, 2004, the Company had total assets of $578.7 million, total deposits of
$506.5 million and shareholders' equity of $53.8 million. The Company has not
engaged in any significant activity other than holding the stock of the Bank.
Accordingly, the information set forth in this report, including financial
statements and related data, relates primarily to the Bank.
As a
result of its conversion to a state chartered bank effective January 2002, the
Bank’s primary regulators are the Tennessee Department of Financial Institutions
(“TDFI”) and the FRB. Prior to the Conversion, the Bank’s primary federal
regulator was the Office of Thrift Supervision (“OTS”). The Bank's deposits have
been federally insured since 1936 and are currently insured by the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) under the Savings Association Insurance
Fund (“SAIF”). The Bank has been a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”)
system since 1936.
The Bank
is a community-oriented financial institution whose primary business is
attracting deposits from the general public and using those funds to originate a
variety of loans to individuals residing within its primary market area, and to
businesses owned and operated by such individuals. The Bank actively makes
construction and acquisition and development loans, commercial real estate
loans, commercial business loans, and consumer and other non-real estate loans.
In addition, the Bank originates both adjustable-rate mortgage (“ARM”) loans and
fixed-rate mortgage loans. Generally, ARM loans are retained in the Bank's
portfolio and long-term fixed-rate mortgage loans are sold in the secondary
market. The Bank also provides trust and investment services through its trust
division and brokerage and investment products through its brokerage division,
Cavalry Investment Services. The Bank’s subsidiary, Miller & Loughry
Insurance and Services, Inc., an independent insurance agency, offers a full
line of insurance products and services as well as human resources management
services.
Market
Area
The Bank
considers Rutherford, Davidson, Bedford and Williamson Counties in Central
Tennessee to be its primary market area. A large number of the Bank's depositors
and borrowers reside in, and a substantial portion of its loan portfolio is
secured by properties located in, Rutherford County.
The
economy of Rutherford County is diverse and generally stable. According to the
Rutherford Area Chamber of Commerce, major employers include Nissan Motor
Manufacturing Corp. USA, Rutherford County Government, Whirlpool Corp.,
Bridgestone/Firestone Inc., Middle Tennessee State University, Alvin C. York
Veterans Administration Medical Center and Ingram Distribution, among
others.
Lending
Activities
General. At
December 31, 2004, the Bank's loans receivable portfolio amounted to $433.0
million, or 74.8% of total assets at that date. Real estate loans, including
mortgage and construction loans, collectively constituted $210.2 million or
47.9% of the gross loan portfolio at December 31, 2004. A substantial portion of
the Bank's loan portfolio is secured by real estate, either as primary or
secondary collateral, located in its primary market area.
Loan
Portfolio Analysis. The
following table sets forth the composition of the Bank's loan portfolio by type
of loan as of the dates indicated.
|
|
At
December 31, |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2001 |
|
2000 |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
Percent |
|
Amount |
|
Percent |
|
Amount |
|
Percent |
|
Amount |
|
Percent |
|
Amount |
|
Percent |
|
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
183,129 |
|
|
41.7 |
% |
|
126,833 |
|
|
35.4 |
|
|
104,512 |
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
130,800 |
|
|
44.1 |
|
|
118,206 |
|
|
41.0 |
|
Real
Estate - construction |
|
|
95,449 |
|
|
21.7 |
|
|
69,667 |
|
|
19.4 |
|
|
66,882 |
|
|
20.7 |
|
|
48,449 |
|
|
16.4 |
|
|
51,042 |
|
|
17.7 |
|
Real
Estate -
mortgage
(1) |
|
|
114,745 |
|
|
26.2 |
|
|
123,575 |
|
|
34.4 |
|
|
125,259 |
|
|
38.7 |
|
|
71,226 |
|
|
24.1 |
|
|
67,295 |
|
|
23.3 |
|
Installment
and other consumer |
|
|
45,739 |
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
38,709 |
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
27,166 |
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
45,424 |
|
|
15.4 |
|
|
52,095 |
|
|
18.0 |
|
Total
loans |
|
|
439,062 |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
358,784 |
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
323,819 |
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
295,899 |
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
288,638 |
|
|
100.0 |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
deferred loan fees |
|
|
1,172 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,199 |
|
|
|
|
|
838 |
|
|
|
|
|
767 |
|
|
|
|
|
742 |
|
|
|
|
Allowance
for loan losses |
|
|
4,863 |
|
|
|
|
|
4,525 |
|
|
|
|
|
4,657 |
|
|
|
|
|
4,470 |
|
|
|
|
|
4,235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
loans receivable, net |
|
$ |
433,027 |
|
|
|
|
|
353,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
318,324 |
|
|
|
|
|
290,662 |
|
|
|
|
|
283,661 |
|
|
|
|
(1)
Includes loans held for sale.
As a
result of the 2002 change to a state bank, certain loans that were classified as
commercial and consumer loans in prior years are now classified as real estate
mortgage. For the year ended December 31, 2002, approximately $27.4 million
classified as mortgage loans would have been classified as commercial and $19.3
million classified as mortgage loans would have been classified as installment
and other consumer loans.
Real
Estate Lending - Mortgage.
Historically, the Bank has concentrated its lending activities on the
origination of loans secured by residential first mortgages located in its
primary market area. At December 31, 2004, $114.7 million, or 26.2% of the
Bank's total loan portfolio, consisted of such loans.
Generally,
the Bank's fixed-rate loans have maturities ranging from 15 to 30 years and are
fully amortizing with monthly payments sufficient to repay the total amount of
the loan with interest by the end of the loan term. Generally, they are
originated under terms, conditions and documentation that permit them to be sold
to U.S. Government sponsored agencies such as the Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Corporation (“FHLMC”). The Bank's fixed-rate loans customarily include “due on
sale” clauses, which give the Bank the right to declare a loan immediately due
and payable in the event the borrower sells or otherwise disposes of the real
property subject to the mortgage and the loan is not paid.
The Bank
also originates ARM loans secured by residences at rates and terms competitive
with market conditions. At December 31, 2004, $50.4 million of these loans, or
11.5% of the Bank's gross loan portfolio, were subject to periodic interest rate
adjustments. The Bank originates for its portfolio ARM loans which provide for
an interest rate which adjusts every year or which is fixed for one, three or
five years and then adjusts every year after the initial period. Most of the
Bank's one-year, three-year and five-year ARMs adjust every year after the
initial fixed rate period based on the one year Treasury constant maturity
index. The Bank's ARMs are typically based on a 30-year amortization schedule.
The Bank's ARM loans generally provide for annual and lifetime interest rate
adjustment limits of 2% and 5% to 6%, respectively.
Borrower
demand for ARM loans versus fixed-rate mortgage loans is a function of the level
of interest rates, the expectations of changes in the level of interest rates
and the difference between the initial interest rates and fees charged for each
type of loan. The relative amount of fixed-rate mortgage loans and ARM loans
that can be originated at any time is largely determined by the demand for each
in a competitive environment.
Construction
Lending. The Bank
actively originates three types of residential construction loans: (i)
speculative construction loans, (ii) pre-sold construction loans and (iii)
construction/permanent loans. The Bank also originates construction loans for
the development of multi-family and commercial properties as well as acquisition
and land development loans.
At
December 31, 2004, the composition of the Bank's construction loan portfolio was
as follows:
|
|
Outstanding
Balance |
|
Percent
of
Total |
|
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands) |
|
Residential: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Speculative
construction |
|
$ |
29,464 |
|
|
30.9 |
% |
Pre-sold
construction |
|
|
13,749 |
|
|
14.4 |
|
Construction/permanent |
|
|
5,147 |
|
|
5.4 |
|
Commercial
and multi-family |
|
|
12,793 |
|
|
13.4 |
|
Acquisition
and land development |
|
|
34,296 |
|
|
35.9 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
95,449 |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Speculative
construction loans are made to home builders and are termed “speculative”
because the home builder does not have, at the time of loan origination, a
signed contract with a home buyer who has a commitment for permanent financing
with either the Bank or another lender for the finished home. The home buyer may
be identified either during or after the construction period, with the risk that
the builder will have to pay debt service on the speculative construction loan
and finance real estate taxes and other carrying costs of the completed home for
a significant time after the completion of construction until the home buyer is
identified.
Unlike
speculative construction loans, pre-sold construction loans are made to
homebuilders who, at the time of construction, have a signed contract with a
homebuyer who has a commitment for permanent financing for the finished home
with the Bank or another lender.
Construction/permanent
loans are originated to the homeowner rather than the homebuilder. The
construction phase of a construction/permanent loan generally lasts 12 months
and the interest rate charged is generally a fixed rate.
The Bank
also provides construction financing for non-residential properties (i.e.,
multi-family and commercial properties).
Construction
lending generally affords the Bank the opportunity to achieve higher interest
rates and fees with shorter terms to maturity than does its single-family
permanent mortgage lending. Construction lending, however, is generally
considered to involve a higher degree of risk than single-family permanent
mortgage lending because of the inherent difficulty in estimating both a
property's value at completion of the project and the estimated cost of the
project. The nature of these loans is such that they are generally more
difficult to evaluate and monitor. If the estimate of construction cost proves
to be inaccurate, the Bank may be required to advance funds beyond the amount
originally committed to permit completion of the project. If the estimate of
value upon completion proves to be inaccurate, the Bank may be confronted with a
project whose value is insufficient to assure full repayment. Projects may also
be jeopardized by disagreements between borrowers and builders and by the
failure of builders to pay subcontractors. Loans to builders to construct homes
for which no purchaser has been identified carry more risk because the payoff
for the loan depends on the builder's ability to sell the property prior to the
time that the construction loan is due. The Bank has sought to address these
risks by adhering to strict underwriting policies, disbursement procedures, and
monitoring practices. In addition, because the Bank's concentration of
construction lending is in its primary market area, changes in the local economy
and real estate market could adversely affect the Bank's construction loan
portfolio.
The Bank
originates acquisition and development (“A&D”) loans for the purpose of
developing the land (i.e., installing roads, sewers, water and other utilities)
for sale for residential housing construction. The majority of the Bank’s
A&D loans are secured by properties located in the Bank's primary market
area. A&D loans are usually repaid through the sale of the developed land.
However, the Bank believes that its A&D loans are made to individuals with,
or to entities the principals/guarantors of which possess, sufficient personal
financial resources out of which the loans could be repaid, if
necessary.
Loans
secured by undeveloped land or improved lots involve greater risks than
residential mortgage loans because such loans are more difficult to monitor and
foreclose as the Bank may be confronted with a property the value of which is
insufficient to assure full repayment. Furthermore, if the borrower defaults,
the Bank may have to expend its own funds to complete development and also incur
costs associated with marketing and holding the building lots pending sale.
A&D loans are generally considered to involve a higher degree of risk than
single-family permanent mortgage loans because of the concentration of principal
among relatively few borrowers and development projects, the increased
difficulty at the time the loan is originated of estimating the development
building costs, the increased difficulty and costs of monitoring the loan, the
higher degree of sensitivity to increases in market rates of interest, and the
increased difficulty of working out problem loans. A concentration of loans
secured by properties in any single area presents the risk that any adverse
change in regional economic or employment conditions may result in increased
delinquencies and loan losses.
Commercial
Lending. Commercial
loans include commercial real estate, commercial business loans, and to a lesser
extent loans secured by farmland, and agricultural loans to finance agricultural
production. The following table indicates the amounts of each classification of
commercial loans at December 31, 2004 and 2003.
|
|
December
31, |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
Outstanding
Balances |
|
Percent
of Total |
|
Outstanding
Balances |
|
Percent
of Total |
|
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands) |
Commercial
loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Properties
secured by farmland |
|
$ |
1,412 |
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
1,052 |
|
|
0.8 |
|
Properties
secured by commercial real estate |
|
|
38,827 |
|
|
21.2 |
|
|
41,407 |
|
|
32.7 |
|
Agricultural
loans |
|
|
70 |
|
|
- |
|
|
41 |
|
|
- |
|
Commercial
business loans |
|
|
142,820 |
|
|
78.0 |
|
|
84,333 |
|
|
66.5 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
183,129 |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
126,833 |
|
|
100.0 |
|
The Bank
originates mortgage loans for the acquisition and refinancing of commercial real
estate properties. The majority of the Bank's commercial real estate properties
are secured by small businesses, retail properties and churches located in the
Bank's primary market area. The average size of a commercial real estate loan in
the Bank's portfolio is approximately $150,000 to $250,000.
Commercial
real estate lending affords the Bank an opportunity to receive interest at rates
higher than those generally available from residential lending. However, loans
secured by such properties usually are greater in amount, more difficult to
evaluate and monitor and, therefore, involve a greater degree of risk than
residential mortgage loans. Because payments on loans secured by multi-family
and commercial properties are often dependent on the successful operation and
management of the properties, repayment of such loans may be affected by adverse
conditions in the real estate market or the economy. The Bank seeks to minimize
these risks by limiting the maximum loan-to-value ratio to 80% and strictly
scrutinizing the financial condition of the borrower, the quality of the
collateral and the management of the property securing the loan. The Bank also
obtains loan guarantees from financially capable parties based on a review of
personal financial statements.
The
Bank's commercial business lending activities focus primarily on small to medium
size businesses owned by individuals who reside in the Bank's primary market
area. Commercial business loans may be unsecured loans, but generally are
secured by various types of business collateral other than real estate (i.e.,
inventory, equipment, etc.). In many instances, however, such loans are often
also secured by junior liens on real estate. Commercial business loans are
generally made in amounts between $50,000 to $100,000 and may be either lines of
credit or term loans.
Commercial
business lending generally involves greater risk than residential mortgage
lending and involves risks that are different from those associated with
residential, commercial and multi-family real estate lending. Real estate
lending is generally considered to be collateral based lending with loan amounts
based on predetermined loan to collateral values and liquidation of the
underlying real estate collateral is viewed as the primary source of repayment
in the event of borrower default. Although commercial business loans are often
collateralized by equipment, inventory, accounts receivable or other business
assets, the liquidation of collateral in the event of a borrower default is
often not a sufficient source of repayment because accounts receivable may be
uncollectible and inventories and equipment may be obsolete or of limited use,
among other things. Accordingly, the repayment of a commercial business loan
depends primarily on the cash flows from the business or the creditworthiness of
guarantors, while liquidation of collateral is a secondary and often
insufficient source of repayment.
As part
of its commercial business lending activities, the Bank issues standby letters
of credit or performance bonds as an accommodation to its borrowers. See “Loan
Commitments and Letters of Credit.”
Consumer
Lending. The Bank
originates a variety of consumer loans that generally have shorter terms to
maturity and higher interest rates than residential mortgage loans. The Bank's
consumer loans consist primarily of home equity lines of credit, automobile
loans, and a variety of other secured loans, a substantial portion of which are
secured by junior mortgages on real estate. To a substantially lesser extent,
the Bank also originates unsecured consumer loans.
Consumer
loans entail greater risk than do residential mortgage loans, particularly in
the case of loans that are unsecured or secured by rapidly depreciating assets
such as automobiles and other vehicles. In such cases, any repossessed
collateral for a defaulted consumer loan may not provide an adequate source of
repayment of the outstanding loan balance as a result of the greater likelihood
of damage, loss or depreciation. The remaining deficiency often does not warrant
further substantial collection efforts against the borrower beyond obtaining a
deficiency judgment. In addition, consumer loan collections are dependent on the
borrower's continuing financial stability, and thus are more likely to be
adversely affected by job loss, divorce, illness or personal bankruptcy.
Furthermore, the application of various federal and state laws, including
federal and state bankruptcy and insolvency laws, may limit the amount that can
be recovered on such loans.
Maturity
of Loan Portfolio. The
following table sets forth certain information at December 31, 2004 regarding
the dollar amount of loans maturing in the Bank's loan portfolio based on their
contractual terms to maturity, but does not include scheduled payments or
potential prepayments. Demand loans, loans having no stated schedule of
repayments and no stated maturity, and overdrafts are reported as due in one
year or less.
|
|
One
Year |
|
After
One Year Through 3 Years |
|
After
3 Years Through 5 Years |
|
After
5 Years Through 10 Years |
|
After
10 Years |
|
Total |
|
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
46,961 |
|
|
25,884 |
|
|
94,477 |
|
|
8,772 |
|
|
7,035 |
|
|
183,129 |
|
Real
estate - construction |
|
|
76,507 |
|
|
15,992 |
|
|
2,920 |
|
|
- |
|
|
30 |
|
|
95,449 |
|
Real
estate - mortgage |
|
|
13,375 |
|
|
13,173 |
|
|
34,928 |
|
|
10,860 |
|
|
42,409 |
|
|
114,745 |
|
Installment
and other consumer |
|
|
11,283 |
|
|
11,237 |
|
|
22,251 |
|
|
553 |
|
|
415 |
|
|
45,739 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
148,126 |
|
|
66,286 |
|
|
154,576 |
|
|
20,185 |
|
|
49,889 |
|
|
439,062 |
|
The
following table sets forth the dollar amount of all loans due after December 31,
2005, which have fixed interest rates or floating or adjustable interest
rates.
|
|
Fixed
Rates |
|
Floating
or Adjustable Rates |
|
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
121,490 |
|
|
14,678 |
|
Real
estate - construction |
|
|
6,094 |
|
|
12,848 |
|
Real
estate - mortgage |
|
|
58,647 |
|
|
42,723 |
|
Installment
and other consumer |
|
|
26,384 |
|
|
8,072 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
212,615 |
|
|
78,321 |
|
Scheduled
contractual principal repayments of loans do not reflect the actual life of such
assets. The actual life of a loan may be substantially less than its contractual
terms because of prepayments. In addition, due-on-sale clauses on loans
generally give the Bank the right to declare loans immediately due and payable
in the event, among other things, that the borrower sells the real property
subject to the mortgage. The average life of mortgage loans tends to increase,
however, when current mortgage loan market rates are substantially higher than
rates on existing mortgage loans and, conversely, decrease when rates on
existing mortgage loans are substantially higher than current mortgage loan
market rates.
Loan
Originations, Sales and Purchases. While
the Bank originates both adjustable-rate and fixed-rate loans, its ability to
generate each type of loan depends upon relative customer demand for loans in
its primary market area.
The Bank
sells most loans originated under FHA and VA programs, including related
servicing rights, including those originated for the THDA. The Bank originated
$130.3 million mortgage loans for sale in 2004. The Bank sold approximately
$133.3 million mortgage loans, and had approximately $2.5 million which were
“held for sale” at December 31, 2004. Approximately 90.0% of the one-to-four
family mortgage loans sold were fixed rate loans. The Bank also periodically
sells conventional one-to-four family loans (i.e., non-FHA/VA loans) with
servicing retained and without recourse. These sales generally involve
fixed-rate loans that help to reduce the Bank’s exposure to interest rate risk,
and the proceeds of sale are used to fund continuing operations. The Bank
occasionally may also sell ARM loans to satisfy liquidity needs. See
“Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations -- Liquidity and Capital Resources,” contained in the Annual
Report.
Sellers
of loans are exposed to various degrees of “pipeline risk,” which is the risk
that the value of the loan will decline during the period between the time the
loan is originated and the time of sale because of changes in market interest
rates. The Bank believes it is exposed to a relatively low degree of pipeline
risk because it generally does not fix the loan interest rate until shortly
before or on the closing date and loans are generally closed against a mandatory
purchase commitment by the purchaser.
Although
the Bank currently sells its fixed-rate first mortgage loans and typically does
not retain servicing on these loans, it has, in the past, retained the
responsibility for servicing the loans for the buyer. Servicing loans includes
collecting and remitting mortgage loan payments, accounting for principal and
interest, and holding and disbursing escrow or impound funds for real estate
taxes and insurance premiums. The Bank receives a servicing fee for performing
these services for others. The Bank's servicing portfolio amounted to $37.1
million at December 31, 2004. The Bank is generally paid a fee equal to 0.25% of
the outstanding principal balance for servicing sold loans. Loan servicing
income totaled $36,000, $49,000, and $75,000 for the years ended December 31,
2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The Bank earns late charges collected from
delinquent customers whose loans are serviced by the Bank. The Bank is allowed
to invest escrow impounds (funds collected from mortgage customers for the
payment of property taxes and insurance premiums on mortgaged real estate) until
they are disbursed on behalf of mortgage customers, but is not required to pay
interest on these funds. At December 31, 2004, borrowers' escrow funds amounted
to $146,000.
Historically,
the Bank has not been an active purchaser of loans or participation interests in
loans.
Loan
Commitments and Letters of Credit. The
Bank issues commitments for mortgage loans that are conditioned upon the
occurrence of certain events. Such commitments are made in writing on specified
terms and conditions and are honored for up to 45 days from approval, depending
on the type of transaction. At December 31, 2004, the Bank had commitments to
originate mortgage loans of $53.2 million and had unused lines of credit of
$40.2 million. Loan commitments are agreements to provide a specific amount of
credit to a borrower normally on a one-time basis. Lines of credit are
commitments to borrowers that revolve allowing the borrower to continue
withdrawing and paying from time to time up to a pre-approved credit limit. See
Note 17 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in the
Annual Report.
As an
accommodation to its commercial business borrowers, the Bank issues standby
letters of credit or performance bonds in favor of entities, usually
municipalities, for whom the Bank's borrowers are performing work or other
services. At December 31, 2004, the Bank had outstanding standby letters of
credit of $8.3 million that were issued primarily to municipalities as
performance bonds. See Note 17 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
contained in the Annual Report.
Loan
Fees. In
addition to interest earned on loans, the Bank receives income from fees in
connection with loan originations, loan modifications, late payments and for
miscellaneous services related to its loan portfolio. Income from these
activities varies from period to period depending upon the volume and type of
loans made and competitive conditions.
The Bank
charges loan origination fees that are calculated as a percentage of the amount
borrowed. In accordance with applicable accounting procedures, loan origination
fees and discount points in excess of loan origination costs are deferred and
recognized over the contractual remaining lives of the related loans on a level
yield basis. Discounts and premiums on loans purchased are accreted and
amortized in the same manner. The Bank recognized $1.1 million, $1.0 million and
$898,000 of deferred loan fees during the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003,
and 2002, respectively, in connection with loan refinancings, payoffs, sales and
ongoing amortization of outstanding loans.
Non-performing
Assets and Delinquencies. Loans
are placed on non-accrual status generally if, in the opinion of management,
principal or interest payments are not likely in accordance with the terms of
the loan agreement, or when principal or interest is past due 90 days or more.
Interest accrued but not collected at the date the loan is placed on non-accrual
status is reversed against income in the current period. Loans may be reinstated
to accrual status when payments are under 90 days past due and, in the opinion
of management, collection of the remaining past due balances can be reasonably
expected. See Note 1 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements and
“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations -- Critical Accounting Policies” and “Comparison of Financial
Condition, Non-Accrual Loans” sections, all contained within the Annual
Report.
Interest
income that would have been recorded for the year ended December 31, 2004 had
non-accruing loans been current in accordance with their original terms was not
significant. No interest income was included in net interest income on such
loans for the year ended December 31, 2004.
Potential
problem assets, which are not included in non-performing assets, amounted to
$5.1 million or 1.19% of total loans, net at December 31, 2004 and $4.3 million
or 1.22% of total loans, net at December 31, 2003. Potential problem assets
represent those assets where information about possible credit problems of
borrowers has caused management to have concerns about a borrower’s ability to
fully comply with contractual repayment terms. This definition is believed to be
substantially consistent with the standards established by the Bank and its
regulators for loans classified as substandard or doubtful.
Foreclosed
Assets.
Foreclosed assets (“ORE”) include property acquired through foreclosure and
deeds in lieu of foreclosure. Property acquired by deed in lieu of foreclosure
results when a borrower voluntarily transfers title to the company in settlement
of the related debt in an attempt to avoid foreclosure. Foreclosed assets also
include other collateral acquired by the Company in an attempt to recover the
debt owed by the borrower. See Note 1 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements contained in the Annual Report for a discussion of the accounting
treatment of foreclosed assets.
Restructured
Loans. Under
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, the Bank is required to account
for certain loan modifications or restructuring as a “troubled debt
restructuring.” In general, the modification or restructuring of a debt
constitutes a troubled debt restructuring if the Bank for economic or legal
reasons related to the borrower's financial difficulties grants a concession to
the borrowers that the Bank would not otherwise consider. Debt restructurings or
loan modifications for a borrower do not necessarily always constitute troubled
debt restructurings, however, and troubled debt restructurings do not
necessarily result in non-accrual loans. The Bank did not have any restructured
loans at December 31, 2004.
Asset
Classification.
Generally, bank regulators have adopted various regulations or guidelines
regarding problem assets of financial institutions. The regulations or
guidelines require that each institution review and classify its assets on a
regular basis. In addition, in connection with examinations of insured
institutions, examiners have authority to identify problem assets and, if
appropriate, require them to be classified. There are three classifications for
problem assets: substandard, doubtful and loss. Substandard assets have one or
more defined weaknesses and are characterized by the distinct possibility that
the insured institution will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not
corrected. Doubtful assets have the weaknesses of substandard assets with the
additional characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in
full on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions and values
questionable, and there is a high possibility of loss. An asset classified as
loss is considered uncollectible and of such little value that continuance as an
asset of the institution is not warranted. If an asset or portion thereof is
classified as loss, the Bank charges the portion considered as loss against its
allowance for loan losses. All or a portion of general loan loss allowances
established to cover possible losses related to assets classified substandard or
doubtful can be included in determining an institution's regulatory capital.
Assets that do not currently expose the insured institution to sufficient risk
to warrant classification in one of the aforementioned categories but possess
weaknesses are designated “special mention” and monitored by the
Bank.
The
aggregate amounts of the Bank's classified and special mention assets were as
follows:
|
|
At
December 31, |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Doubtful |
|
$ |
310 |
|
|
138 |
|
Substandard
assets |
|
|
4,829 |
|
|
4,117 |
|
Special
mention |
|
|
67 |
|
|
193 |
|
Totals |
|
$ |
5,206 |
|
|
4,448 |
|
Provision
for Loan Losses. The Bank
has established a systematic methodology for the determination of provisions for
loan losses. The methodology is set forth in a formal policy and takes into
consideration the need for an overall general valuation allowance as well as
specific allowances that are tied to individual loans.
Provisions
for loan losses are charges to earnings to bring the total allowance for loan
losses to a level considered by management as adequate to provide for estimated
losses based on concentrations, trends in historical loss experience, specific
impaired loans and economic conditions. In determining the adequacy of the
allowance for loan losses, management periodically reviews the loan portfolio
and considers such factors as delinquency status, past performance problems,
historical loss experience, adverse situations that may affect the ability of
the borrowers to repay, known and inherent risks in the portfolio, assessments
of economic conditions, regulatory policies, and the estimated value of
underlying collateral. The Bank’s credit management systems have resulted in low
loan loss experience; however, there can be no assurances that such experience
will continue. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations -- Critical Accounting Policies” and “Critical
Accounting Estimates” sections contained within the Annual Report.
At
December 31, 2004, the Bank had an allowance for loan losses of $4.9 million.
Management believes that the amount maintained in the allowance at December 31,
2004 will be adequate to absorb losses inherent in the portfolio. Although
management believes that it uses the best information available to make such
determinations, future adjustments to the allowance for loan losses may be
necessary and results of operations could be significantly and adversely
affected if circumstances differ substantially from the assumptions used in
making the determinations. Furthermore, while the Bank believes it has
established its existing allowance for loan losses in accordance with U.S. GAAP,
there can be no assurance that regulators, in reviewing the Bank's loan
portfolio, will not request the Bank to increase significantly its allowance for
loan losses. In addition, because future events affecting borrowers and
collateral cannot be predicted with certainty, there can be no assurance that
the existing allowance for loan losses is adequate or that substantial increases
will not be necessary should the quality of any loans deteriorate as a result of
the factors discussed above. Any material increase in the allowance for loan
losses may adversely affect the Bank's financial condition and results of
operations.
Investment
Activities
The Bank
is permitted under federal law to invest in various types of liquid assets,
including U.S. Treasury obligations, securities of various federal agencies and
state and municipal governments, deposits at the FHLB-Cincinnati, certificates
of deposit of federally insured institutions, certain bankers' acceptances and
federal funds. Subject to various restrictions, the Bank may also invest a
portion of its assets in commercial paper and corporate debt securities. The
Bank as a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) and the Federal Reserve
Bank (FRB) is also required to maintain an investment in FHLB and FRB stock. The
Bank as a matter of safety and soundness is required to maintain adequate levels
of liquid assets. See
“Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations -- Liquidity and Capital Resources,” contained in the Annual
Report.
The
Bank's investment policies generally limit investments to U.S. Government and
agency securities, municipal bonds, certificates of deposit, marketable
corporate debt obligations, and mortgage-backed securities. The Bank's
investment policy does not permit the purchase of high-risk mortgage derivative
products or non-investment grade corporate bonds. Investments are made based on
certain considerations, which include the interest rate, yield, settlement date
and maturity of the investment, the Bank's liquidity position, and anticipated
cash needs and sources (which in turn include outstanding commitments, upcoming
maturities, estimated deposits and anticipated loan amortization and
repayments). The effect that the proposed investment would have on the Bank's
credit and interest rate risk and risk-based capital is also
considered.
During
2004, the Company restructured its portfolio to extend maturities and to
increase yields. This restructuring was accomplished by selling lower yielding
agency securities and using the proceeds to purchase higher yield
mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations.
The
following table sets forth the amortized cost and fair value of the Bank's debt,
mortgage-backed and other securities, by accounting classification and by type
of security, at the dates indicated.
|
|
At
December 31, |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
Amortized
Cost
(1) |
|
Percent
of
Total |
|
Amortized
Cost
(1) |
|
Percent
of
Total |
|
Amortized
Cost
(1) |
|
Percent
of
Total |
|
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held
to Maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLB
and FRB stock |
|
$ |
3,125 |
|
|
6.87 |
% |
|
2,992 |
|
|
5.15 |
|
|
2,874 |
|
|
7.08 |
|
Total
held to maturity securities |
|
|
3,125 |
|
|
6.87 |
|
|
2,992 |
|
|
5.15 |
|
|
2,874 |
|
|
7.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available
for Sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt
Securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.
Government agency obligations |
|
|
9,297 |
|
|
20.43 |
|
|
50,132 |
|
|
86.24 |
|
|
26,551 |
|
|
65.40 |
|
Mortgage
backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
|
29,459 |
|
|
64.75 |
|
|
4,579 |
|
|
7.88 |
|
|
10,752 |
|
|
26.47 |
|
State
and political subdivisions |
|
|
3,195 |
|
|
7.02 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
Other
securities |
|
|
425 |
|
|
0.93 |
|
|
425 |
|
|
0.73 |
|
|
425 |
|
|
1.05 |
|
Total
available for sale securities |
|
|
42,376 |
|
|
93.13 |
|
|
55,136 |
|
|
94.85 |
|
|
37,728 |
|
|
92.92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
portfolio |
|
$ |
45,501 |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
$ |
58,128 |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
40,602 |
|
|
100.00 |
|
(1)
The
market value of the investment portfolio amounted to $45.3 million, $58.1
million and $40.8 million at December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. At
December 31, 2004, the market value of the principal components of the Bank's
investment securities portfolio was as follows: U.S. Government securities, $9.3
million; collateralized mortgage obligations and mortgage-backed securities,
$29.3 million; state and political subdivisions, $3.2 million; other securities,
$425,000, and FHLB and FRB stock, $3.1 million.
The
following table sets forth, the maturities and weighted average yields of the
investment securities in the Bank's portfolio at December 31, 2004.
|
|
Less
Than One Year |
|
One
Year to Five Years |
|
Over
Five Years to Ten Years |
|
Over
Ten Years |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
Yield |
|
Amount |
|
Yield |
|
Amount |
|
Yield |
|
Amount |
|
Yield |
|
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands) |
|
Held
to Maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLB
and FRB stock |
|
$ |
3,125 |
|
|
4.80 |
% |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
Total
held to maturity securities |
|
|
3,125 |
|
|
4.80 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available
for Sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt
Securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.
Government agency obligations |
|
|
8,993 |
|
|
2.14 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
302 |
|
|
2.92 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
Mortgage
backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
|
2,833 |
|
|
3.55 |
|
|
9,449 |
|
|
3.73 |
|
|
9,068 |
|
|
3.39 |
|
|
7,914 |
|
|
3.85 |
|
State
and political subdivisions (1) |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
771 |
|
|
3.73 |
|
|
2,428 |
|
|
5.05 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
Other
securities |
|
|
100 |
|
|
1.85 |
|
|
325 |
|
|
1.68 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
Total
available-for-sale securities |
|
|
11,926 |
|
|
2.47 |
|
|
10,545 |
|
|
3.67 |
|
|
11,798 |
|
|
3.72 |
|
|
7,914 |
|
|
3.85 |
|
Total
portfolio |
|
$ |
15,051 |
|
|
2.96 |
% |
|
10,545 |
|
|
3.67 |
|
|
11,798 |
|
|
3.72 |
|
|
7,914 |
|
|
3.85 |
|
(1)
Tax-exempt securities are not stated on a tax-equivalent basis
In
addition to its investment portfolio, the Bank holds life insurance policies on
certain directors and officers. The cash value of this life insurance is $11.6
million, which includes an increase of $296,000 in the cash surrender value
during 2004.
Deposit
Activities and Other Sources of Funds
General.
Deposits are the major external source of funds for the Bank's lending and other
investment activities. In addition, the Bank also generates funds internally
from loan principal repayments and prepayments and maturing investment
securities. Scheduled loan repayments are a relatively stable source of funds,
while deposit inflows and outflows and loan prepayments are influenced
significantly by general interest rates and market conditions. Borrowings from
the FHLB-Cincinnati may be used on a short-term basis to compensate for
reductions in the availability of funds from other sources.
Deposit
Accounts. Most of
the Bank's depositors reside in Tennessee. The Bank's deposit products include a
broad selection of deposit instruments, including NOW accounts, demand deposit
accounts, money market accounts, savings accounts and certificates of deposit.
Deposit account terms vary with the principal difference being the minimum
balance deposit, early withdrawal penalties and the interest rate. The Bank
reviews its deposit mix and pricing weekly. The Bank does not utilize brokered
deposits, nor has it aggressively sought jumbo certificates of
deposit.
The Bank
believes it is competitive in the type of accounts and interest rates it offers
on its deposit products. The Bank does not seek to pay the highest deposit rates
but a competitive rate. The Bank determines the rates paid based on a number of
conditions, including rates paid by competitors, rates on U.S. Treasury
securities, rates offered on various FHLB-Cincinnati lending programs, and the
deposit growth rate the Bank is seeking to achieve.
The
following table indicates the amount of the Bank's jumbo certificates of deposit
by time remaining until maturity as of December 31, 2004. Jumbo certificates of
deposit have principal balances of $100,000 or more and the rates paid on such
accounts are generally negotiable.
Maturity
Period |
|
Amount |
|
(Dollars
in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Three
months or less |
|
$ |
17,203 |
|
Over
three through six months |
|
|
7,232 |
|
Over
six through twelve months |
|
|
15,186 |
|
Over
twelve months |
|
|
36,545 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
76,166 |
|
Deposit
Flow
The
following table sets forth the balances of deposits in the various types of
accounts offered by the Bank at the dates indicated.
|
|
At
December 31, |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
Percent
of Total |
|
Increase
(Decrease) |
|
Amount |
|
Percent
of Total |
|
Increase
(Decrease) |
|
Amount |
|
Percent
of Total |
|
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest-bearing |
|
$ |
81,719 |
|
|
16.13 |
% |
$ |
9,276 |
|
|
72,443 |
|
|
15.96 |
|
|
15,100 |
|
|
57,343 |
|
|
14.06 |
|
Interest-bearing
demand |
|
|
232,126 |
|
|
45.83 |
|
|
24,077 |
|
|
208,049 |
|
|
45.80 |
|
|
26,119 |
|
|
181,930 |
|
|
44.62 |
|
Savings |
|
|
23,083 |
|
|
4.56 |
|
|
2,075 |
|
|
21,008 |
|
|
4.62 |
|
|
4,364 |
|
|
16,644 |
|
|
4.08 |
|
Certificates
of deposit, which mature as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within
1 year |
|
|
93,421 |
|
|
18.44 |
|
|
(8,164 |
) |
|
101,585 |
|
|
22.36 |
|
|
(809 |
) |
|
102,394 |
|
|
25.11 |
|
After
1 year, but within 2 years |
|
|
36,875 |
|
|
7.28 |
|
|
12,384 |
|
|
24,491 |
|
|
5.39 |
|
|
(3,628 |
) |
|
28,119 |
|
|
6.90 |
|
After
2 years, but within 5 years |
|
|
39,300 |
|
|
7.76 |
|
|
12,629 |
|
|
26,671 |
|
|
5.87 |
|
|
5,349 |
|
|
21,322 |
|
|
5.23 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
10 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
10 |
|
|
- |
|
|
10 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
Total |
|
$ |
506,534 |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
$ |
52,277 |
|
|
454,257 |
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
46,505 |
|
|
407,752 |
|
|
100.00 |
|
Time
Deposits by Rates. The
following table sets forth the amount of time deposits in the Bank categorized
by rates at the dates indicated.
|
|
At
December 31, |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 -
1.99% |
|
$ |
39,738 |
|
|
50,395 |
|
|
25,654 |
|
2.00 -
3.99% |
|
|
98,393 |
|
|
72,289 |
|
|
83,375 |
|
4.00 -
4.99% |
|
|
21,857 |
|
|
13,287 |
|
|
18,876 |
|
5.00 -
5.99% |
|
|
8,275 |
|
|
14,313 |
|
|
17,446 |
|
6.00 -
6.99% |
|
|
1,012 |
|
|
2,039 |
|
|
5,333 |
|
7.00%
and over |
|
|
331 |
|
|
434 |
|
|
1,151 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
169,606 |
|
|
152,757 |
|
|
151,835 |
|
Time
Deposits by Maturities. The
following table sets forth the amount of time deposits in the Bank categorized
by maturities at December 31, 2004.
|
|
Amount
Due |
|
|
|
One
Year |
|
After
One to Two Years |
|
After
Two to Three Years |
|
After
Three to Four Years |
|
After
4 Years |
|
Total |
|
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 -
1.99% |
|
$ |
35,995 |
|
|
3,729 |
|
|
14 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
39,738 |
|
2.00 -
3.99% |
|
|
53,231 |
|
|
27,386 |
|
|
6,994 |
|
|
6,636 |
|
|
4,146 |
|
|
98,393 |
|
4.00 -
4.99% |
|
|
2,803 |
|
|
3,690 |
|
|
5,726 |
|
|
5,799 |
|
|
3,839 |
|
|
21,857 |
|
5.00 -
5.99% |
|
|
224 |
|
|
1,976 |
|
|
4,547 |
|
|
161 |
|
|
1,367 |
|
|
8,275 |
|
6.00 -
6.99% |
|
|
837 |
|
|
94 |
|
|
81 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
1,012 |
|
7.00%
and over |
|
|
331 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
331 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
93,421 |
|
|
36,875 |
|
|
17,362 |
|
|
12,596 |
|
|
9,352 |
|
|
169,606 |
|
Borrowings. Retail
deposits are the primary source of funds for the Bank's lending and investment
activities and for its general business purposes. The Bank has the ability to
use advances from the FHLB-Cincinnati to supplement its supply of lendable funds
and to meet deposit withdrawal requirements. The FHLB-Cincinnati functions as a
central reserve bank providing credit for savings associations and for those
banks that are FHLB members. As a member of the FHLB-Cincinnati, the Bank is
required to own capital stock in the FHLB-Cincinnati and is authorized to apply
for advances on the security of such stock and certain of its mortgage loans and
other assets (principally securities that are obligations of, or guaranteed by,
the U.S. Government) provided certain creditworthiness standards have been met.
Advances are made pursuant to several different credit programs. Each credit
program has its own interest rate and range of maturities. Depending on the
program, limitations on the amount of advances are based on the financial
condition of the member institution and the adequacy of collateral pledged to
secure the credit. At December 31, 2004, the Bank had three advances outstanding
from the FHLB-Cincinnati in the amount of $2.8 million with a weighted average
rate of 3.37%. The Bank also had an approved line of credit of $50.0 million. At
December 31, 2004, the Bank could increase its borrowings from the FHLB by $62.5
million. See Note 10 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained
in the Annual Report, included as Exhibit 13 and incorporated by reference in
Item 8.
At
December 31, 2004, the Company did not have any other borrowings
outstanding.
The
following table sets forth certain information regarding FHLB borrowings by the
Bank at the end of and during the periods indicated:
|
|
At
or For the Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum
amount of borrowings outstanding at any month end |
|
$ |
2,885 |
|
|
2,939 |
|
|
2,957 |
|
Approximate
average borrowings outstanding |
|
|
2,860 |
|
|
2,914 |
|
|
1,643 |
|
Approximate
weighted average rate paid on borrowings |
|
|
3.37 |
% |
|
3.38 |
|
|
2.92 |
|
Trust
Department
The OTS
granted trust powers to the Bank on December 13, 1991 and such powers continued
upon the conversion to a state chartered bank. The Bank is one of the few banks
in its primary market area providing a broad range of trust services. These
services include acting as trustee under a living trust, a Standby Trust or
Testamentary Trust; acting as personal representative; agency services,
including custody accounts, agent for the trustee, and agent for the personal
representative; and trustee and agent services for accounts subject to the
provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended
(“ERISA”). In addition to providing fiduciary and investment advisory services,
the Bank provides employee benefit services, such as Self-Directed Individual
Retirement Accounts (“IRAs”). At December 31, 2004, trust assets under
management totaled approximately $149.7 million and non-managed assets totaled
$110.4 million.
Personnel
As of
December 31, 2004, the Company had 194 full-time employees and 55 part-time
employees. The employees are not represented by a collective bargaining unit and
the Company believes its relationship with its employees is good.
Available
Information
The
Company’s Internet website is http://www.cavb.com. The Company makes available
free of charge on its website the Company’s annual reports on Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to
those reports as soon as reasonably practicable after it electronically files or
furnishes such materials to the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).
Information contained on the Company’s website is not part of this
report.
REGULATION
General
The Bank
is subject to extensive regulation, examination and supervision by the Tennessee
Department of Financial Institutions, its chartering agency, by its primary
federal regulator (FRB) and by the insurer of its deposits (FDIC). The Bank must
file reports with one or more of these regulatory agencies concerning its
activities and financial condition in addition to obtaining regulatory approvals
prior to entering into certain transactions such as mergers with, or
acquisitions of, other financial institutions. There are periodic examinations
by these agencies to review the Bank’s compliance with various regulatory
requirements. The regulatory structure also gives the regulatory authorities
extensive discretion in connection with their supervisory and enforcement
activities and examination policies, including policies with respect to the
classification of assets and the establishment of adequate loan loss reserves
for regulatory purposes. Any change in such policies, whether by the FRB, the
Tennessee Department of Financial Institutions, the FDIC or Congress could have
a material adverse impact on the Company, the Bank and their operations. The
Company, as a bank holding company, is required to file certain reports and
comply with the holding company rules and regulations of the FRB.
Federal
Regulation
Federal
Reserve System. Effective
January 1, 2002, the Bank became a member of the Federal Reserve System.
Membership requirements for the Bank are set forth in Regulation H (12 CFR 225).
The Bank is required to own stock in the Federal Reserve Bank to be a member of
the Federal Reserve System. The total subscription of a member bank equals 6
percent of its capital and surplus. Capital stock and surplus of a member bank
means the paid-in capital stock and paid-in surplus of such bank, less any
deficit in the aggregate of its retained earnings, gains (losses) on
available-for-sale securities, and foreign currency translation accounts. Upon
approval by the Federal Reserve Bank of an application for capital stock, the
applying bank pays the Federal Reserve Bank one-half of the subscription amount
plus accrued dividends. Upon payment the Federal Reserve Bank issues the
appropriate number of shares on its books. At December 31, 2004, the Bank’s
investment in Federal Reserve Bank stock was $674,000.
Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation. The
FDIC is an independent federal agency established originally to insure the
deposits, up to prescribed statutory limits, of federally insured banks and to
preserve the safety and soundness of the banking industry. The FDIC maintains
two separate insurance funds: the Bank Insurance Fund (“BIF”) and the SAIF. The
Bank's deposit accounts are insured by the FDIC under the SAIF to the maximum
extent permitted by law. As insurer of the Bank's deposits, the FDIC has
examination, supervisory and enforcement authority.
Under
applicable regulations, the FDIC assigns an institution to one of three capital
categories based on the institution’s financial information, as of the reporting
period ending seven months before the assessment period. The capital categories
are: (i) well-capitalized, (ii) adequately capitalized, or (iii)
undercapitalized. An institution is also placed in one of three supervisory
subcategories within each capital group. The supervisory subgroup to which an
institution is assigned is based on a supervisory evaluation provided to the
FDIC by the institution’s primary federal regulator and information that the
FDIC determines to be relevant to the institution’s financial condition and the
risk posed to the deposit insurance funds. An institution’s assessment rate
depends on the capital category and supervisory category to which it is
assigned, with the most well capitalized, healthy institutions receiving the
lowest rates.
On
September 20, 1996, the Deposit Insurance Funds Act (“DIF Act”) was enacted,
which, among other things, imposed a special one-time assessment on SAIF member
institutions, including the Bank, to recapitalize the SAIF. As a result of the
DIF Act and the special one-time assessment, the FDIC reduced the assessment
schedule for SAIF members, effective January 1, 1997, to a range of 0% to 0.27%,
with most institutions, including the Bank, paying 0%. This assessment schedule
is the same as that for the BIF, which reached its designated reserve ratio in
1995. In addition, since January 1, 1997, SAIF members are charged an assessment
of 0.065% of SAIF-assessable deposits for the purpose of paying interest on the
obligations issued by the Financing Corporation (“FICO”) in the 1980s to help
fund the thrift industry cleanup. BIF-assessable deposits are charged an
assessment to help pay interest on the FICO bonds at a rate of approximately
..013%. Since December 31, 1999 FICO payments have been shared pro rata between
BIF and SAIF members.
The FDIC
is authorized to raise the assessment rates in certain circumstances. The FDIC
has exercised this authority several times in the past and may raise insurance
premiums in the future. If such action is taken by the FDIC, it could have an
adverse effect on the earnings of the Bank.
Under the
Federal Deposit Insurance Act (“FDIA”), insurance of deposits may be terminated
by the FDIC upon a finding that an insured institution has engaged in unsafe or
unsound practices, is in an unsafe or unsound condition to continue operations
or has violated any applicable law, regulation, rule, order or condition imposed
by the FDIC or the FRB. Management of the Bank does not know of any practice,
condition or violation that might lead to termination of deposit
insurance.
Prompt
Corrective Action. The
FDIA requires each federal banking agency to implement a system of prompt
corrective action for institutions that it regulates. The federal banking
agencies have promulgated substantially similar regulations to implement this
system of prompt corrective action. Under the regulations, an institution shall
be deemed to be (i) “well capitalized” if it has a total risk-based capital
ratio of 10.0% or more, has a Tier I risk-based capital ratio of 6.0% or
more, has a leverage ratio of 5.0% or more and is not subject to specified
requirements to meet and maintain a specific capital level for any capital
measure; (ii) “adequately capitalized” if it has a total risk-based capital
ratio of 8.0% or more, a Tier I risk-based capital ratio of 4.0% or more
and a leverage ratio of 4.0% or more (3.0% under certain circumstances) and does
not meet the definition of “well capitalized;” (iii) “undercapitalized” if it
has a total risk-based capital ratio that is less than 8.0%, a Tier I risk-based
capital ratio that is less than 4.0% or a leverage ratio that is less than 4.0%
(3.0% under certain circumstances); (iv) “significantly undercapitalized” if it
has a total risk-based capital ratio that is less than 6.0%, a Tier I
risk-based capital ratio that is less than 3.0% or a leverage ratio that is less
than 3.0%; and (v) “critically undercapitalized” if it has a ratio of tangible
equity to total assets that is equal to or less than 2.0%.
The FDIA
also provides that a federal banking agency may, after notice and an opportunity
for a hearing, reclassify a well capitalized institution as adequately
capitalized and may require an adequately capitalized institution or an
undercapitalized institution to comply with supervisory actions as if it were in
the next lower category if the institution is in an unsafe or unsound condition
or is engaging in an unsafe or unsound practice. The FRB may not, however,
reclassify a significantly undercapitalized institution as critically
undercapitalized.
An
institution generally must file a written capital restoration plan that meets
specified requirements, as well as a performance guaranty by each company that
controls the institution, with the appropriate federal banking agency within 45
days of the date that the institution receives notice or is deemed to have
notice that it is undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized or critically
undercapitalized. Immediately upon becoming undercapitalized, an institution
shall become subject to various mandatory and discretionary restrictions on its
operations.
At
December 31, 2004, the Bank was categorized as “well capitalized” under the
prompt corrective action regulations of the FRB.
Standards
for Safety and Soundness. The
federal banking regulatory agencies have prescribed, by regulation, standards
for all insured depository institutions relating to: (i) internal controls,
information systems and internal audit systems; (ii) loan documentation; (iii)
credit underwriting; (iv) interest rate risk exposure; (v) asset growth; (vi)
asset quality; (vii) earnings; and (viii) compensation, fees and benefits
(“Guidelines”). The Guidelines set forth the safety and soundness standards that
the federal banking agencies use to identify and address problems at insured
depository institutions before capital becomes impaired. If the FRB determines
that the Bank fails to meet any standard prescribed by the Guidelines, the
agency may require the Bank to submit to the agency an acceptable plan to
achieve compliance with the standard. Management is aware of no conditions
relating to these safety and soundness standards that would require submission
of a plan of compliance.
The
Company-Capital Requirements. The FRB
has adopted minimum capital ratios and guidelines to provide a framework for
assessing the adequacy of the capital of bank holding companies and state member
banks. The Federal Reserve’s capital guidelines established the following
minimum regulatory capital requirements for bank holding companies: (i) a
risk-based requirement expressed as a percentage of total risk-weighted assets;
and (ii) a leverage requirement expressed as a percentage of total assets. The
risk-based requirement consists of a minimum ratio of total capital to
risk-weighted assets of 8% and a minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to total
risk-weighted assets of 4%. The leverage requirement consists of a minimum ratio
of Tier 1 capital to total assets of 3% for the most highly rated companies,
with a minimum requirement of 4% for all others. For purposes of these capital
standards, Tier 1 capital consists of permanent stockholders’ equity less
intangible assets (other than certain loan servicing rights and purchased credit
card relationships). Total capital consists primarily of Tier 1 capital and a
portion of the Company’s allowance for loan losses.
The
risk-based and leverage standards described above are minimum requirements.
Higher capital levels will be required if warranted by the particular
circumstances or risk profiles of individual banking organizations. For example,
the Federal Reserve’s capital guidelines contemplate that additional capital may
be required to take adequate account of, among other things, interest rate risk,
or the risks posed by concentrations of credit, nontraditional activities or
securities trading activities. Further, any banking organization experiencing or
anticipating significant growth would be expected to maintain capital ratios,
including tangible capital positions (i.e., Tier 1 capital less all intangible
assets), well above the minimum levels. At December 31, 2004, the Company had
regulatory capital in excess of the Federal Reserve’s minimum
requirements.
The
Bank-Capital Requirements. The
Federal Reserve has established the following minimum capital standards for
state-chartered Federal Reserve System member banks, such as the Bank: (i) a
leverage requirement consisting of a minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to total
assets of 3% for the most highly-rated banks with a minimum requirement of at
least 4% for all others; (ii) a risk-based capital to total risk-weighted assets
of 8%, and (iii) a minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to total risk-weighted assets
of 4%. For purposes of these capital standards, Tier 1 capital and total capital
consist of substantially the same components as Tier 1 capital and total capital
under the Federal Reserve’s capital guidelines for bank holding companies (see
“The Company - Capital Requirements”).
The
capital requirements described above are minimum requirements. Higher capital
levels will be required if warranted by the particular circumstances or risk
profiles of individual institutions. For example, the regulations of the Federal
Reserve provide that additional capital may be required to take adequate account
of, among other things, interest rate risk or the risks posed by concentrations
of credit, nontraditional activities or securities trading
activities.
Further,
federal law and regulations provide various incentives to financial institutions
to maintain regulatory capital at levels in excess of minimum regulatory
requirements. For example, a financial institution that is “well-capitalized”
may qualify for exemptions from prior notice or application requirements
otherwise applicable to certain types of activities and may qualify for
expedited processing of other required notices or applications. Additionally,
one of the criteria that determine a bank holding company’s eligibility to
operate as a financial holding company is a requirement that all of its
financial institution subsidiaries be “well-capitalized.” Under the regulations
of the Federal Reserve, in order to be “well-capitalized” a financial
institution must maintain a ratio of total capital to total risk-weighted assets
of 10% or greater, a ratio of Tier 1 capital to total risk-weighted assets of 6%
or greater and a ratio of Tier 1 capital to total assets of 5% or greater.
Federal
law also provides the federal banking regulators with broad power to take prompt
corrective action to resolve the problems of undercapitalized institutions. The
extent of the regulators’ powers depends on whether the institution in question
is “adequately capitalized,” “undercapitalized,” “significantly
undercapitalized” or “critically undercapitalized,” in each case as defined by
regulations. Depending upon the capital category to which an institution is
assigned, the regulators’ corrective powers include: (i) requiring the
institution to submit a capital restoration plan; (ii) limiting the
institution’s asset growth and restricting its activities; (iii) requiring the
institution to issue additional capital stock (including additional voting
stock) or to be acquired; (iv) restricting transactions between the institution
and its affiliates; (v) restricting the interest rates the institution may pay
on deposits; (vi) ordering a new election of directors of the institution; (vii)
prohibiting the institution from accepting deposits from correspondent banks;
(viii) requiring the institution to divest certain subsidiaries; (ix)
prohibiting the payment of principal or interest on subordinated debt; and (x)
ultimately, appointing a receiver for the institution (See “Regulation - Prompt
Corrective Action”).
The
following table presents the Bank's and the Company’s regulatory capital
compliance as of December 31, 2004.
|
|
Actual |
|
For
Capital Adequacy Purposes |
|
To
Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action
Provisions |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
|
|
|
(Dollars
in Thousands, Except Percentages) |
|
Total
risk-based capital: (to risk -weighted assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank |
|
$ |
49,872 |
|
|
11.3 |
% |
|
35,384 |
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
44,230 |
|
|
10.0 |
|
Company |
|
|
56,909 |
|
|
12.7 |
|
|
35,728 |
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
44,660 |
|
|
10.0 |
|
Tier
1 risk-based capital: (to risk-weighted assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank |
|
|
45,005 |
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
17,692 |
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
26,538 |
|
|
6.0 |
|
Company |
|
|
52,042 |
|
|
11.7 |
|
|
17,864 |
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
26,796 |
|
|
6.0 |
|
Tier
1 risk-based capital: (to
adjusted total assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank |
|
|
45,005 |
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
21,953 |
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
27,441 |
|
|
5.0 |
|
Company |
|
|
52,042 |
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
22,451 |
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
28,064 |
|
|
5.0 |
|
Limitations
on Capital Distributions.
Tennessee state law and FRB regulations impose limitations on the ability of
banks to make various distributions of capital such as dividends, stock
repurchases and cash-out mergers. Generally under all of these regulations,
prior regulatory application and approval is required if the total capital
distributions for the calendar year exceed net income for that year plus the
amount of retained net income for the preceding two years. The capital of the
Bank is also restricted by a liquidation account that is described in Note 14 of
the consolidated financial statements included in the Annual
Report.
Holding
Company Regulations
Holding
Company Acquisitions. The
Bank Holding Company Act generally prohibits a bank, without prior regulatory
approval, from acquiring more than 5% of the voting stock of any other bank or
bank holding company or controlling the assets thereof. The Bank Holding Company
Act also prohibits, among other things, any individual who controls a holding
company from acquiring control of any bank, unless the acquisition has
regulatory approval.
Holding
Company Activities. As a
bank holding company, the Company may only engage in certain activities, and its
acquisition of companies engaged in non-banking activities is subject to FRB
approval under certain circumstances.
Competition
The Bank
faces intense competition in its primary market area for the attraction of
deposits (its primary source of lendable funds) and in the origination of loans.
Its most direct competition for deposits has historically come from other
commercial banks, credit unions, thrifts, and other financial institutions such
as brokerage firms and insurance companies. As of December 31, 2004, there were
21 commercial banks and 3 credit unions operating in Rutherford and Bedford
Counties, Tennessee. Particularly in times of high interest rates, the Bank has
faced additional significant competition for investors' funds from short-term
money market securities and other corporate and government securities. The
Bank's competition for loans comes from commercial banks, thrift institutions,
credit unions and mortgage bankers. Such competition for deposits and the
origination of loans may limit the Bank's growth in the future.
Subsidiary
Activities
Under
Tennessee law, the Bank generally may invest, in the aggregate, up to 75% of its
capital in the stock of, or purchase of the assets of, other corporations,
firms, partnerships or companies, including limited liability companies and
partnerships that engage in certain approved activities. However, TDFI
regulations provide that no bank shall invest more than 25% of its capital in
any single corporation, firm, partnership, or company including limited
liability companies or partnerships. The Bank’s investment in 100% of the
capital stock of Miller & Loughry Insurance and Services, Inc., which had a
value of approximately $2.5 million at December 31, 2004, did not exceed these
limits.
The Bank,
on January 4, 2002, purchased 100% of the capital stock issued and outstanding
of Miller & Loughry Insurance and Services, Inc. for cash totaling
approximately $2.0 million. Miller & Loughry is an independent insurance
agency that also provides human resource outsourcing services. The Bank recorded
income from this investment of approximately $185,000 for the year ended
December 31, 2004.
Item
2. Properties
The
following table sets forth certain information regarding the Bank's offices at
December 31, 2004, all of which are owned. Management believes that the current
facilities are adequate to meet the present and immediately foreseeable needs of
the Bank and the Company. The mortgage lending and banking segments utilize all
locations. The insurance and trust segments utilize the Financial Services
Building.
|
|
Approximate |
|
Location |
Year
Opened |
Square
Footage |
Deposits |
|
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Main
Office: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114
W. College Street
Murfreesboro,
Tennessee 37130 |
1974 |
48,632 |
$281,506 |
|
|
|
|
Branch
Offices: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1745
Memorial Boulevard
Murfreesboro,
Tennessee 37129 |
1984 |
1,925 |
26,209 |
|
|
|
|
1645
N.W. Broad Street
Murfreesboro,
Tennessee 37129 |
1995 |
1,500 |
15,146 |
|
|
|
|
123
Cason Lane
Murfreesboro,
Tennessee 37128 |
1997 |
2,987 |
45,954 |
|
|
|
|
604
N. Main Street
Shelbyville,
Tennessee 37160 |
1958 |
1,500 |
28,209 |
|
|
|
|
269
S. Lowry Street
Smyrna,
Tennessee 37167 |
1972 |
3,898 |
36,555 |
|
|
|
|
467
Sam Ridley Parkway West
Smyrna,
Tennessee 37167 |
2003 |
5,000 |
8,711 |
|
|
|
|
2604
South Church Street
Murfreesboro,
TN 37127 |
1998 |
2,470 |
23,956 |
|
|
|
|
2035
SE Broad Street
Murfreesboro,
TN 37130 |
1997 |
2,038 |
40,288 |
|
|
|
|
Financial
Services Building: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
214
W. College
Murfreesboro,
Tennessee 37130 |
2000 |
60,000 |
NA |
The Bank
owns two commercial building lots on which the Company intends to develop future
branch office locations. One building site is located at 2014 Lascassas Pike in
Murfreesboro, Tennessee and is the location of a freestanding automated teller
machine. The second lot is located on Thompson Lane near the intersection of
Thompson Lane and Memorial Boulevard in Murfreesboro, Tennessee.
The Bank
uses the services of an outside service bureau for its significant data
processing applications. At December 31, 2004, the Bank had 15 proprietary
automated teller machines. At December 31, 2004, the net book value of the
Bank's office properties, fixtures, furniture and equipment was $17.6
million.
Item
3. Legal
Proceedings
Periodically,
there have been various claims and lawsuits involving the Company and the Bank,
such as claims to enforce liens, condemnation proceedings on properties in which
the Company or the Bank holds security interests, claims involving the making
and servicing of real property loans and other issues incident to the Company's
business. Neither the Company nor the Bank or any other subsidiary is a party to
any pending legal proceedings that the Company believes would have a material
adverse effect on the financial condition or operations of the Company. See Note
19 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in the Annual
Report.
Item
4. Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
No
matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter
of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004.
PART
II
Item
5. Market
for the Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
The
information contained under the section captioned “Corporate Information” is
included in the Company’s Annual Report to Shareholders (the “Annual Report”)
and is incorporated herein by reference.
The
following table provides information about purchases by the Company during the
quarter ended December 31, 2004 of equity securities that are registered by the
Company pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act:
ISSUER
PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
|
Period |
|
Total
number of shares purchased |
|
Average
price paid per share |
|
Total
number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or
programs |
|
Maximum
number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or
programs |
|
October
1, 2004 through October 31, 2004 |
|
|
12,000 |
|
$ |
16.95 |
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
275,261 |
|
November
1, 2004 through November 30, 2004 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
275,261 |
|
December
1, 2004 through December 31, 2004 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
275,261 |
|
Total |
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
16.95 |
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
|
On
September 26, 2001, the Company announced its plans to implement a program to
repurchase 710,480 shares of its common stock outstanding (“stock repurchase
program”). The stock repurchase program does not have an expiration date and
unless terminated earlier by resolution of the Company’s board of directors,
will expire when the Company has repurchased all shares authorized for
repurchase thereunder. The Company has no other programs to repurchase common
stock at this time.
Item
6. Selected
Financial Data
The
information contained under the section captioned “Selected Financial Data” is
included in the Company’s Annual Report and is incorporated herein by
reference.
Item
7. Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
The
information contained under the section captioned “Management’s Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” is included in the
Company’s Annual Report and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item
7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk
The
information contained under the section captioned “Management's Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk - Asset and Liability Management” is
included in the Company’s Annual Report and is incorporated herein by
reference.
Item
8. Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data
The
information contained under the section captioned “Consolidated Financial
Statements” is included in the Company’s Annual Report and is incorporated
herein by reference.
Item
9. Changes
in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial
Disclosure
None.
Item
9 A. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure
Controls and Procedures. The
Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in
Rule13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
“Exchange Act”) that are designed to insure that information required to be
disclosed by it in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act
is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified under the SEC’s rules and forms and that such information is
accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely
decision making regarding required disclosure. The Company, under the
supervision and participation of its management, including the Company’s Chief
Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, carried out an evaluation of
the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure
controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report
pursuant to the Exchange Act. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive
Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure
controls and procedures were effective.
Management’s
Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. As of the
date of filing this Form 10-K, the Company, and its registered public accounting
firm, have not finalized the report of management, and the related attestation
of the registered public accounting firm, regarding the effectiveness of the
Company’s internal control over financial reporting. In reliance on the
Securities and Exchange Commission’s 45-day extension for issuers of a certain
size, the required management report and related registered public accounting
firm attestation are not included with this Form 10-K, but, rather, will be
included in an amendment to this Form 10-K to be filed by the Company prior to
the expiration of the 45-day extension. Currently, management of the Company is
not aware of any material weaknesses in the Company’s internal control over
financial reporting, however, no assurances can be given that a material
weakness will not be discovered between the date of this Form 10-K and the date
of the filing of the amendment to this Form 10-K described above.
Changes
in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. During
the quarter ended December 31, 2004, there have been no changes in the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected or are
reasonably likely to materially affect the Company’s internal control over
financial reporting.
Item
9 B. Other Events
None.
PART
III
Item
10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
The
information required by this item is contained in the sections captioned
“Proposal -- Election of Directors,” “Meeting and Committees of the Board of
Directors,” “Corporate Governance” and “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership
Reporting Compliance” in the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement for the 2005
Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “Proxy Statement”) and is incorporated
herein by reference.
The
following table sets forth certain information with respect to the executive
officers of the Company and the Bank.
Executive
Officers of the Company and the Bank
|
|
Position |
Name |
Age |
Company |
Bank |
|
|
|
|
Ed
C. Loughry, Jr. |
62 |
Chairman
of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |
Chairman
of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
Gary
Brown |
62 |
Vice
Chairman of the Board |
Vice
Chairman of the Board |
|
|
|
|
Ronald
F. Knight |
54 |
President
and Chief Operating Officer |
President
and Chief Operating Officer |
|
|
|
|
William
S. Jones |
45 |
Executive
Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer |
Executive
Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer |
|
|
|
|
Hillard
C. “Bud” Gardner |
56 |
Senior
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
Senior
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
David
W. Hopper |
62 |
- |
Senior
Vice President and Trust Officer |
|
|
|
|
Ira
B. Lewis, Jr. |
58 |
Senior
Vice President and Secretary |
Senior
Vice President/CRA Compliance Officer and Secretary |
|
|
|
|
R.
Dale Floyd |
54 |
- |
Senior
Vice President |
|
|
|
|
M.
Glenn Layne |
50 |
- |
Senior
Vice President |
|
|
|
|
Joy
B. Jobe |
60 |
- |
Senior
Vice President |
Biographical
Information
Set forth
below is certain information regarding the executive officers of the Company and
the Bank. Unless otherwise stated, each executive officer has held his current
occupation for the last five years. There are no family relationships among or
between the executive officers.
Ed C.
Loughry, Jr. joined
the Bank in 1968 and currently serves as Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer of the Bank and the Company. Mr. Loughry has served on the
Boards of Directors of the Rutherford County Chamber of Commerce, United Way,
Heart Fund, the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati, and the ABA Bank Pac
Board. He is past Chairman of the Tennessee Bankers Association and currently
serves on the TBA Board. He is also currently serving on the Middle Tennessee
Medical Center Board, the Nashville Federal Reserve Bank Board, the American
Bankers Association Board, and the Christy-Houston Foundation. He was selected
Business Person of the Year in 1993 and Business Legend in 2000 by the
Rutherford County Chamber of Commerce.
Gary
Brown is the
owner and President of Roscoe Brown, Inc. in Murfreesboro, Tennessee, Air Care
Heating and Cooling in Nashville, Tennessee and Roscoe Brown Heating and Cooling
in Tullahoma, Tennessee. Mr. Brown, a graduate of MTSU, has served on the
Murfreesboro Water & Sewer Department Board, the Electrical Examining board,
the chamber of Commerce Board, the MTSU Foundation and the Air Conditioning
Contractors Board.
Ronald
F. Knight joined
the Bank in 1972 and currently serves as President and Chief Operating Officer
and as a member of the Board of Directors of the Bank and the Company. Mr.
Knight currently serves on the Tennessee Housing Development Agency Board,
Chairman of the Tennessee State Collateral Pool Board, the Board of Directors of
Main Street Murfreesboro/Rutherford County, Division Chair of United Way and
committee member of the Tennessee Bankers Association and Destination
Rutherford. Mr. Knight was selected as the 2002 Business Person of the Year by
the Rutherford County Chamber of Commerce and was voted Most Community Minded
Business Leader in 2003. Previously, he served on the Rutherford County Economic
Development Council, the Board of Directors of the Rutherford County Chamber of
Commerce (for which he served as Chairman), the Board of Directors of the
Tennessee Savings and Loan League (for which he served as Chairman), and the
Board of Directors of the Tennessee Bankers Association. Mr. Knight is the
Co-Founder of a local charity "Christmas for the Children."
William
S. Jones joined
the Bank in 1992 after working with SunTrust Banks, Inc., and its predecessors.
Mr. Jones currently serves as Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative
Officer, a position he has held since 1999. Mr. Jones previously held the
position of Vice President/Senior Vice President and Trust Officer of the Bank
from 1992 to 1997, during which he pioneered the development of the Company’s
trust division. Mr. Jones serves on the council of Past Presidents of the Board
of Trustees of the Middle Tennessee State University Foundation, and as Chairman
of the Rutherford County Chamber of Commerce. Mr. Jones actively supports a
variety of charitable endeavors, especially through serving as a member of the
Middle Tennessee Medical Center Foundation and as Chairman of the 2004 American
Heart Association Heart Ball Gala committee for Rutherford County, Tennessee.
Moreover, Mr. Jones is a Member of the Saint Thomas Health Systems Foundation
Investment Committee and is a Member of the Executive Committee of Destination
Rutherford.
Hillard
C. “Bud” Gardner joined
the Bank in 1981 and has been Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
since 1982. Mr. Gardner is a member of the Tennessee Society of Certified Public
Accountants, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and the
Optimist International.
David
W. Hopper joined
the Bank in 1992 and has been Senior Vice President and Trust Officer since that
time. Mr. Hopper is a graduate of the ABA's National Graduate Trust School and
has served as Chairman of the Tennessee Bankers Association Trust Division. Mr.
Hopper has over thirty years experience in the trust and wealth management
industry and has started trust departments at two banks. Mr. Hopper is President
of the Murfreesboro Rotary Club, Chairman of the Murfreesboro City School Board,
and a member of the Nashville Estate Planning Council.
R.
Dale Floyd joined
the Bank in September 1987 and has been Senior Vice President since October
1988. As Senior Vice President, he supervises the Bank's mortgage lending
activities, including originations, construction and land development lending.
Mr. Floyd's civic activities include participation in Leadership Rutherford,
Habitat for Humanity, and Stones River Ducks Unlimited. Mr. Floyd is also a
member of the Affordable Housing Advisory Council of the City of Murfreesboro,
the National Mortgage Bankers Association, and the Home Builders Associations of
Rutherford County and Middle Tennessee.
M.
Glenn Layne joined
the Bank in August 1994 with over 17 years of banking experience and is
currently Senior Vice President and Manager of Commercial and Consumer Lending.
Before joining the Bank, Mr. Layne served as Vice President and Manager of a
Commercial Lending Group with SunTrust Bank. Mr. Layne also serves as Finance
Committee Chairman for the Belle Aire Baptist Church.
Joy
B. Jobe joined
the Bank in May 1995 with over 24 years of banking experience. She currently
serves as Senior Vice President and Chief Business Development Officer
overseeing Private Banking and Sales. Before joining the Bank, Ms. Jobe was a
Commercial Loan Officer, Relationship Manager and Assistant Vice President with
SunTrust Bank. Ms. Jobe is a graduate of Leadership Rutherford and a member of
the Board of Directors of the Heart of Tennessee Chapter of the American Red
Cross.
Ira
B. Lewis, Jr. joined
the Bank in 1993 as a Vice President Internal Audit and Compliance. Mr. Lewis
became Secretary in January 1996 and Senior Vice President in January 2000.
Before joining the Bank, Mr. Lewis was an Examiner and Field Manager of the
Office of Thrift Supervision’s Nashville Area Office.
The
information required by this item with respect to the Company's code of ethics
is incorporated herein by reference to the section entitled "Corporate
Governance" in the Company's definitive proxy materials filed in connection with
the 2005 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
The
information required by this item with respect to the Company's audit committee
and any “audit committee financial expert” is incorporated herein by reference
to the section entitled "Proposal - Election of Directors - Meetings and
Committees of the Board of Directors " in the Company's definitive proxy
materials filed in connection with the 2005 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders.
Item
11. Executive Compensation
The
information required by this item is contained under the section captioned
“Executive Compensation” in the Company’s Proxy Statement and is incorporated
herein by reference.
Item
12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related
Stockholder Matters
The
following table summarizes information concerning the Company’s equity
compensation plans at December 31, 2004:
Plan
Category |
Number
of Shares to be Issued upon Exercise of Outstanding Options and
Warrants |
Weighted
Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options and Warrants |
Number
of Shares Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity
Compensation Plans (Excluding Shares Reflected in First
Column) |
|
|
|
|
Equity
compensation plans approved by shareholders |
205,842 |
$10.26 |
- |
|
|
|
|
Equity
compensation plans not approved by shareholders |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
Total |
205,842 |
$10.26 |
- |
The
information required by this item with respect to ownership of the Company’s
common stock is contained under the section captioned “Security Ownership of
Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” in the Company’s Proxy Statement and
is incorporated herein by reference.
The
Company is not aware of any arrangements, including any pledge by any person of
securities of the Company, the operation of which may at a subsequent date
result in a change in control of the Company.
Item
13. Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions
The
information required by this item is contained under the section captioned
“Certain Transactions” in the Company’s Proxy Statement and is incorporated
herein by reference.
Item
14. Principal
Accountant Fees and Services
The
information required by this item is contained under the section captioned
“Relationship with Principal Accountants” in the Company’s Proxy Statement and
is incorporated herein by reference.
PART
IV
Item
15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
(a) Exhibits
3.1 |
Charter
of the Registrant (1) |
3.2 |
Bylaws
of the Registrant, as amended (restated for SEC electronic filing purposes
only) (5) |
10.1 |
Employment
Agreement with Ed C. Loughry, Jr. (6) |
10.2 |
Employment
Agreement with Ronald F. Knight (6) |
10.3 |
Employment
Agreement with William S. Jones (6) |
10.4 |
Employment
Agreement with Myron Glenn Layne (6) |
10.5 |
Employment
Agreement with James O. Sweeney (6) |
10.6
|
Severance
Agreement with Hillard C. Gardner (2) |
10.7
|
Severance
Agreement with Ira B. Lewis (2) |
10.8
|
Severance
Agreement with R. Dale Floyd (2) |
10.9
|
Severance
Agreement with Myron Glenn Layne (2) |
10.10 |
Severance
Agreement with Joy B. Jobe (2) |
10.11 |
Severance
Agreement with William S. Jones (2) |
10.12 |
Severance
Agreement with David W. Hopper (2) |
10.13 |
Cavalry
Banking Key Personnel Severance Compensation Plan (2) |
10.14 |
Cavalry
Banking Employee Stock Ownership Plan (2) |
10.15 |
Cavalry
Bancorp, Inc. 1999 Stock Option Plan (3) |
10.32 |
Director
Supplemental Retirement Plan (4) |
10.33 |
Executive
Supplemental Retirement Plan (4) |
10.34 |
Agreement
of March 31, 2003, between Cavalry Bancorp, Inc. and Edward Elam
|
13 |
Annual
Report to Stockholders |
21 |
Subsidiaries
of the Registrant |
23 |
Consent
of Rayburn, Bates & Fitzgerald, P.C. |
31.1 |
CEO
Certification Pursuant Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) |
31.2 |
CFO
Certification Pursuant Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) |
32.1 |
CEO
Certification Pursuant 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, Sarbanes - Oxley Act 2002
|
32.2 |
CFO
Certification Pursuant 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, Sarbanes - Oxley Act 2002
|
|
(1) |
Incorporated
herein by reference to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form
S-1, as amended (333-40057). |
|
(2) |
Incorporated
herein by reference to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 1997, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on March 30, 1998. |
|
(3) |
Incorporated
herein by reference to the Registrant's Annual Meeting Proxy Statement
dated March 15, 1999, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on March 15, 1999. |
|
(4) |
Incorporated
herein by reference to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended March 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on May 10, 2002. |
|
(5) |
Incorporated
herein by reference to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on March 25, 2003. |
|
(6) |
Incorporated
herein by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 28,
2005. |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by
the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
CAVALRY
BANCORP, INC. |
Date:
March 11, 2005 |
by: |
|
|
|
Ed
C. Loughry, Jr. |
|
|
Chairman
of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |
Pursuant
to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the
following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
SIGNATURES |
TITLE |
DATE |
|
|
|
|
Chief
Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board |
March
11, 2005 |
Ed
C. Loughry, Jr. |
|
|
(Principal
Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
March
10, 2005 |
Hillard
C. “Bud” Gardner |
|
|
(Principal
Financial and |
|
|
Accounting
Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vice
Chairman of the Board |
March
8, 2005 |
Gary
Brown |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director,
President and Chief Operating Officer |
March
11, 2005 |
Ronald
F. Knight |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director |
March
7, 2005 |
Tim
J. Durham |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director |
March
8, 2005 |
James
C. Cope |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director |
March
8, 2005 |
Terry
G. Haynes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director |
March
7, 2005 |
William
H. Huddleston, IV |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director |
March
9, 2005 |
William
K. Coleman |
|
|