Back to GetFilings.com







SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998
or
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM ______ TO _______

COMMISSION FILE NO. 0-27436

TITAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

DELAWARE 94-3171940
-------- ----------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. employer
dentification incorporation or organization) identification number)



400 OYSTER POINT BLVD., SUITE 505, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94080
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

(650) 244-4990
--------------
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT:
None

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT:
Common Stock, $.001 par value
Class A Warrants

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding twelve (12) months (or for such shorter period that
the registrant was required to file such report(s)), and (2) has been subject to
the filing requirements for the past ninety (90) days. YES X NO
-----

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K [X].

The aggregate market value of the voting stock (excluding preferred stock
convertible into and having voting rights on certain matters equivalent to
606,061 shares of common stock) held by non-affiliates of the registrant was
approximately $51,697,091, based on the last sales price of the common stock as
of March 25, 1999.

As of March 29, 1999, 15,378,053 shares of common stock, $.001 par value, of the
registrant were issued and outstanding.



PART I

Statements in this Form 10-K that are not descriptions of historical
facts are forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and
uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those currently
anticipated due to a number of factors, including those set forth under "Risk
Factors" including, but not limited to, the results of research and development
efforts, the results of preclinical and clinical testing, the effect of
regulation by the United States Food and Drug Administration ("FDA") and other
agencies, the impact of competitive products, product development,
commercialization and technological difficulties, the results of financing
efforts, the effect of the Company's accounting policies, and other risks
detailed in the Company's Securities and Exchange Commission filings.


ITEM 1. BUSINESS

(a) GENERAL DEVELOPMENT OF BUSINESS

Titan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is engaged in the development of
therapeutic products for the treatment of cancer, disorders of the central
nervous system ("CNS") and other serious and life-threatening diseases.

Titan's product, Iloperidone, is currently in Phase III clinical
testing for schizophrenia through a strategic alliance with Novartis Pharma AG.
Novartis has tradenamed the product Zomaril-TM-, and the Phase III program,
which will enroll 3,300 patients in 24 countries, has been named the ZEUS-TM-
program (Zomaril Efficacy/Utility and Safety program). Zomaril is being
developed for the treatment of schizophrenia and related psychotic disorders--a
market expected to exceed $4 billion within one year. Also in the CNS arena,
Titan is developing a unique cell based therapeutic, Spheramine-TM- for the
treatment of Parkinson's disease. Titan's cancer therapeutics in clinical
testing include three immunotherapeutics--CeaVac-TM-, TriAb-TM-, and
TriGem-TM---that are designed to stimulate a patient's immune system against
cancer cells. CeaVac-TM- is currently in multicenter double-blind prospectively
controlled Phase II clinical testing for colorectal cancer. TriAb-TM- is
currently in multicenter double-blind prospectively controlled Phase II clinical
testing for breast cancer. TriGem-TM- has completed Phase I testing in melanoma,
and Titan is pursuing later stage clinical trials through co-operative groups.
Another anti cancer product in development, Pivanex-TM-, is a small molecule
drug that acts as a cell differentiating agent. Pivanex is currently in Phase II
clinical testing for non-small cell lung cancer. Additionally, Titan is
developing gene therapy products for treating various cancers and a long term
drug delivery system with applications in the treatment of CNS disorders.

The Company was incorporated in Delaware in February 1992 and has been
funded through various sources, including private placements of its securities,
as well as an initial public offering of its securities in January 1996,
corporate partnerships and government grants.

Titan's gene therapy and long term drug delivery technologies are being
developed in Titan's two consolidated subsidiaries: Ingenex, Inc., and ProNeura,
Inc., respectively. Titan merged a former consolidated subsidiary, Theracell,
Inc., into Titan in March 1999. References to the Company and its products
herein include the products under development by the two subsidiaries.

(b) FINANCIAL INFORMATION ABOUT INDUSTRY SEGMENTS

The Company operates in only one business segment.

(c) NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS


PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS

ILOPERIDONE- SCHIZOPHRENIA AND RELATED PSYCHOTIC DISORDERS

In January 1997, the Company entered into a license agreement with
Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc., pursuant to which it acquired an exclusive
worldwide license to Iloperidone, an antipsychotic agent in development for
treatment of schizophrenia and related disorders. Schizophrenia strikes early in
life and is generally viewed as a chronic, life-long disorder. Schizophrenia is
characterized by the presence of "positive" symptoms, such as delusions,
hallucinations, and disorganized speech, and "negative" symptoms such as
withdrawal and apathy. According to the World Health Organization, approximately
45 million people worldwide have some form of schizophrenia or a related
psychotic disorder.

2


Iloperidone is one of a new class of antipsychotic medications,
referred to as atypical antipsychotics, which are believed to be more effective
against most of the symptoms of schizophrenia with a lower incidence of side
effects than older medications. The results of Phase II trials, demonstrate that
Iloperidone may provide effective treatment against both positive and negative
symptoms of schizophrenia, with low incidence of extrapyramidal symptoms and
other significant side effects associated with antipsychotic compounds currently
on the market.

In November 1997, Titan entered into an agreement with Novartis Pharma
AG in which Titan granted a sublicense to Novartis for the worldwide (with the
exception of Japan) development, manufacturing and marketing of Iloperidone,
tradenamed Zomaril-TM-. Pursuant to the Novartis sublicense, Novartis paid Titan
approximately $17.4 million in license fees and reimbursement of research and
development expenses and made a $5 million equity investment in Titan, and is
required to make additional milestone and royalty payments to Titan and Hoechst.
Novartis commenced its Phase III "ZEUS-TM-" program for Zomaril in August 1998.

IMMUNOTHERAPEUTICS- CANCER THERAPY

The Company is engaged in development of cancer therapeutic vaccines
utilizing anti-idiotypic ("anti-id") antibody technology licensed from the
University of Kentucky Research Foundation. The anti-id therapeutics under
development are targeted at a specific antigen that is primarily present on the
targeted cancer cell and is not commonly found on normal tissue. From a
molecular biological perspective the anti-id antibody is structurally similar to
the cancer antigen. When injected into a patient, the vaccine acts as a trigger
for the normal immune system's response of lymphocytes to attack cancer cells.

The Company is developing three such products that have collectively
demonstrated an immune response in humans against antigens associated with colon
cancer, breast cancer, ovarian cancer, small cell lung cancer, melanoma and
other cancers. The products are:

- CeaVac-TM- The Company believes this product has potential
utility in the treatment of adenocarcinomas, notably, colorectal
cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, pancreatic cancer, gastric
cancer and other cancers. Carcinoembryonic antigen is produced by
the largest group of cancers, adenocarcinomas. In particular, this
product has received significant interest in the international
oncology community, as it is the first published report of a
vaccine to consistently break carcinoembryonic antigen immune
tolerance in humans. CeaVac-TM- is currently in multicenter,
controlled Phase II clinical testing for colorectal cancer. The
Company is also pursuing additional clinical studies through co-
operative groups.

- TriAb-TM- The Company believes this product has potential utility
in the treatment of breast, ovarian and non-small cell lung cancer.
TriAb-TM- is currently in multicenter double-blind controlled Phase
II clinical testing for breast cancer.

- TriGem-TM- The Company believes this product has potential
utility in the treatment of melanoma, small cell lung cancer and
sarcoma. TriGem-TM- has completed Phase I testing in melanoma and
the Company is pursuing later stage clinical trials through co-
operative groups.


PIVANEX-TM-- ANTI-CANCER THERAPY BASED UPON CELLULAR DIFFERENTIATION

Pivanex-TM- is made from a patented analog of butyric acid and has
demonstrated in laboratory tests the ability to destroy cancer cells through the
mechanism of cellular differentiation. Traditional cytotoxic chemotherapeutics
tend to kill cancer cells preferentially because cancer cells divide more often
and more rapidly than most normal cells. Unfortunately, such agents may also
kill rapidly dividing normal cells, including blood cells and cells of the
intestine lining, which leads to side effects such as anemia, nausea, vomiting
and risk of infection. Unlike traditional cytotoxic chemotherapy,
differentiation therapy represents a relatively new direction in cancer
research, and involves the development of agents that, in contrast to the
function of cytotoxic agents, induce cancer cells to differentiate and undergo
terminal cellular senescence. Differentiation therapy may also lead to
apoptosis, or what is known as normal "programmed cell death," resulting in the
destruction of the cancer cells while sparing normal cells. Pivanex-TM- is
currently in Phase II clinical testing in patients with non-small cell lung
cancer.

3


CELL THERAPY PRODUCTS- PARKINSON'S DISEASE

The Company is engaged in the development of cell-based therapeutics
intended for use in the treatment of neurologic diseases. A majority of
neurological disorders, including Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease,
stroke and epilepsy, occur when brain cells (neurons) die. Because neurons
cannot readily regenerate in response to injury or cell death, most current
pharmaceutical therapies are directed toward amplifying the function of the
remaining neurons, an approach which becomes less effective over time as an
increasing number of the neurons die. In addition, because traditional drugs are
delivered through the blood stream to all body tissues, even though they are
intended to act on only certain sites in the brain, side effects result from the
delivery of the agents to these other non-target organs and tissues. The
Company's proprietary technologies enable the development of cell-based
therapies for minimally-invasive, site specific (i.e., stereotaxic) delivery to
the central nervous system of therapeutic factors precisely where they are
needed in order to treat the neurological disease or disorder.

One of the Company's technologies, licensed on an exclusive worldwide
basis from New York University, involves the direct implantation into the CNS of
microscopic beads ("microcarriers"), the surfaces of which are coated with live
cells that secrete therapeutic factors useful in the treatment of certain
neurological diseases. The beads provide a matrix, or surface, to which cells
attach and grow. The Company believes that this cell coated microcarrier
technology can facilitate site-specific delivery of missing or deficient
neurotransmitters and growth factors to diseased or injured areas of the brain
by increasing the survival and successful engraftment of implanted cells. The
Company's first product under development based on this technology is
Spheramine-TM-, consisting of microcarriers coated with dopamine-producing human
pigmented retinal epithelial cells intended for the treatment of Parkinson's
disease. Preliminary evidence of efficacy of Spheramine has been demonstrated in
a validated primate model of Parkinson's Disease (MPTP monkey model). Further
preclinical studies in primates are in progress and the Company plans to begin
Phase I/II clinical trials of this product in Parkinson's disease during 1999.

Complementing the cell coated microcarrier technology is a technology
based on Sertoli cells, which has been licensed exclusively on a worldwide basis
from the University of South Florida. These unique cells secrete several growth
factors potentially important to the repair and resprouting of damaged neurons.
The Company is evaluating potential utility of this technology in selected
therapeutic settings and seeking collaborative opportunities for further
development.


GENE THERAPY PRODUCTS- CANCER

The Company is currently developing RB94, a gene therapy product for
the treatment of cancer, under an exclusive worldwide license from the Baylor
College of Medicine held by Titan's Ingenex subsidiary. RB94 combines a
truncated variant (p94) of the RB gene, a tumor suppressor gene, with a viral
vector. The Company believes the form of the RB protein encoded by the RB94 gene
therapy product is more effective at causing suppression of tumor cells than the
full-length RB protein, based on data demonstrating in vitro suppression of
numerous tumor types tested to date, including tumors of the bladder, prostate,
cervix, bone, breast, lung and fibrous tissue. In addition, preliminary
experiments indicate the modified gene is effective in suppressing some cancer
cell lines in vitro that continue to contain the functional native RB gene.

The potential gene therapy product RB94 will consist of the modified RB
gene and an appropriate liposome or viral vector. The product would initially be
delivered directly to tumor cells through local application. In collaboration
with MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, Texas, the Company is currently
testing RB94 in preclinical studies of solid tumors in mouse models, and during
1999 expects to conduct additional preclinical testing with other academic
institutions in preparation for pilot clinical trials. Titan owns 81% of the
outstanding stock of Ingenex.


IMPLANTABLE DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM

The Company is developing a sustained drug delivery technology with
application in the treatment of a number of neurologic and psychiatric disorders
in which conventional treatment is limited by variability of drug concentration
in blood and poor patient compliance. The technology, which has been licensed
from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, consists of a polymeric drug
delivery system that potentially can provide controlled drug release over
extended periods (i.e., from three months to more than one year). The technology
involves imbedding the

4


drug of interest in a polymer, which is then implanted subcutaneously to
provide systemic delivery as body fluids wash over the implant and the drug
is released. This results in a constant rate of release similar to
intravenous administration. The Company believes that such long-term, linear
release characteristics are highly desirable, avoiding peak and trough level
dosing that poses problems for many CNS and other therapeutic agents.

The Company is conducting further preclinical evaluation of prototype
products through contract research and manufacturing organizations through its
ProNeura subsidiary. The project is currently supported by an SBIR grant and the
Company has applied for additional grants for further development. Titan
currently owns approximately 79% of ProNeura.


SPONSORED RESEARCH AND LICENSE AGREEMENTS

The Company is party to several agreements with research institutions,
companies, universities and other entities for the performance of research and
development activities and for the acquisition of licenses relating to such
activities.

ILOPERIDONE

In January 1997, the Company acquired an exclusive worldwide license
under United States and foreign patents and patent applications relating to the
use of Iloperidone for the treatment of psychiatric and psychotic disorders and
analgesia. The Hoechst agreement provides for the payment of an up-front license
fee in cash and stock of $9.5 million, which was paid by the Company in 1997, as
well as additional late stage milestone payments. See "Item 7. Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations." The
Hoechst agreement also provides for the payment of royalties on net sales and
requires the Company to satisfy certain other terms and conditions in order to
retain its rights thereunder. In November 1997, the Company granted a sublicense
to Novartis under which Novartis will continue all further development of
Iloperidone and will make milestone payments to the Company equivalent to its
milestone obligations to Hoechst, and will also pay Titan a net royalty on sales
and the product.

IMMUNOTHERAPEUTICS

Effective May 31, 1996, the Company acquired an exclusive, worldwide
license under certain United States and foreign patent and patent applications
pursuant to a license agreement with the University of Kentucky Research
Foundation. These patent and patent applications relate to the anti-idiotypic
antibodies known as 3H1, 1A7 and 11D10 and their fragments, derivatives or
analogs. The Kentucky agreement obligates the Company to fund research at the
University of Kentucky at amounts agreed to on an annual basis, for the five
year period ending November 14, 2001. The Kentucky agreement provides for the
payment of certain license fees as well as royalties based on net sales of
licensed products by the Company or any sublicensees. The Company must also pay
all costs and expenses incurred in obtaining and maintaining patents, and
diligently pursue a vigorous development program for the products in order to
maintain its license rights under the Kentucky agreement.

PIVANEX-TM-

The Company has acquired, from Bar-Ilan Research and Development Co.
Ltd., an exclusive, worldwide license to an issued United States patent and
certain foreign patents, and patent applications covering novel analogs of
butyric acid owned by Bar-Ilan University and Kupat Hulim Health Insurance
Institution. The Bar-Ilan agreement provides for the payment by the Company to
Bar-Ilan of royalties based on net sales of products and processes incorporating
the licensed technology, subject to minimum annual amounts commencing in 1995,
as well as a percentage of any income derived from any sublicense of the
licensed technology. The Company must also pay all costs and expenses incurred
in patent prosecution and maintenance. The Company's minimum annual royalty for
1999 and thereafter is $60,000.

The Company must also satisfy certain other terms and conditions set
forth in the Bar-Ilan agreement in order to retain its license rights
thereunder, including the use of reasonable best efforts to bring any products
developed under

5


the Bar-Ilan agreement to market, the timely commencement of toxicology
testing on small and large animals, the development of and compliance with a
detailed business plan and the timely payment of royalty fees.

CELL THERAPY PRODUCTS

The Company acquired an exclusive, worldwide license under certain
United States and foreign patent applications relating to the cell coated
microcarrier technology pursuant to a research and license agreement with New
York University. The NYU agreement provides for the payment of royalties based
on net sales of products and processes incorporating licensed technology, as
well as a percentage of any income it receives from any sublicense thereof. The
Company is also obligated to reimburse NYU for all costs and expenses incurred
by NYU in filing, prosecuting and maintaining the licensed patents and patent
applications.

The Company must satisfy certain other terms and conditions of the NYU
agreement in order to retain its license rights thereunder. These include, but
are not limited to, the use of best efforts to bring licensed products to market
as soon as commercially practicable and to diligently commercialize such
products thereafter, the use of best efforts to carry out the performance of all
efficacy, pharmaceutical, safety, toxicological and clinical tests and to obtain
all appropriate governmental approvals for the production, use and sale of the
licensed products, the development of and compliance with a detailed business
plan and the timely payment of license and royalty fees.

In March 1996, the Company acquired an exclusive, worldwide license
under United States and foreign patent applications relating to the Sertoli cell
technology pursuant to a license agreement with the University of South Florida
and the University of South Florida Research Foundation, Inc.. The South Florida
agreement provides for the payment of royalties based on net sales by the
Company or any sublicensees of products and processes incorporating licensed
technology. The Company is also obligated to reimburse South Florida for all
costs and expenses incurred by South Florida in filing, prosecuting and
maintaining the licensed patent rights. The Company must satisfy certain other
terms and conditions of the USF agreement in order to retain its license rights
thereunder. These include the development and introduction into clinical trials
of at least one product within three years of such date and an additional
product every two years thereafter until commercialization of one product and
the timely payment of license and royalties.


GENE THERAPY PRODUCTS

In October 1992, the Company acquired an exclusive, worldwide license
under United States and foreign patent applications assigned to Baylor College
of Medicine relating to the RB gene, including its use in conferring senescence
to tumors that form the basis of RB94. The Baylor license provides for royalties
based on net sales of products and processes incorporating the licensed
technology, subject to certain minimum annual amounts and a percentage of
sublicensing income arising from the license of such products and processes.
Under the Baylor license, the Company must use reasonable best efforts to bring
any products developed under the Baylor license to market, develop and comply
with a detailed business plan, fund research pursuant to the Baylor research
agreement, commence a cancer therapy research program, make timely payment of
royalty fees and pay all costs and expenses incurred in patent filing,
prosecution and maintenance.

The Company is a party to several license agreements with the
University of Illinois at Chicago which grant the Company the exclusive
worldwide license under certain issued patents and patent applications,
including those relating to methods for preventing multi-drug resistance and the
human MDR1 gene. The exclusive nature of the Chicago licenses is subject in
certain instances to certain reservations, including the use of all or part of
the subject matter of the licenses for research, education and other
non-commercial purposes. In addition, the Company's rights under the MDR1
license are subject to a non-exclusive right granted to Glaxo-Wellcome to
transfect cell lines with the MDR1 gene, and to use the transfectants for
research purposes. Glaxo-Wellcome does not, however, have the right to sell
or transfer the transfectants or any derivatives thereof, without the written
authorization of the University of Illinois at Chicago.

The Company has acquired an exclusive license from MIT under an issued
patent relating to the use of MDR genes for creating and selecting drug
resistant mammalian cells. The MIT license is subject to prior grants of (a) an
irrevocable, royalty-free, nonexclusive license granted to the United States
government, (b) non-exclusive licenses granted to Eli Lilly, Inc. and Genetics
Institute, Inc. for research purposes and (c) non-exclusive, commercial licenses

6


that may be granted pursuant to options granted to Eli Lilly and Genetics
Institute to use aspects of the licensed technology but only to make products
that do not incorporate genes claimed in the patent, proteins expressed by such
genes or antibodies and inhibitors to such genes. The MIT license provides for
the payment of royalties based on net sales of products and processes
incorporating the licensed technology, subject to certain minimum annual
amounts, a percentage of sublicensing income arising from the license of such
products and processes, and the issuance to MIT of shares of Ingenex's common
stock. Under the MIT license, the Company must also use reasonable best efforts
to bring any products developed under the MIT license to market, develop and
comply with a detailed business plan and make timely payment of license and
royalty fees.


IMPLANTABLE DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM

The Company has acquired from MIT an exclusive worldwide license to
certain United States and foreign patents relating to the implantable drug
delivery system. The MIT license required the Company to invest $1,800,000 in
operating capital toward development of products and processes covered by the
MIT license during the two years ended September 1997, of which $1,685,000 has
been invested to date. The exclusive nature of the MIT license was also subject
to the condition that an IND application had been filed with the FDA by December
31, 1997. MIT has agreed to change the September 30 and December 31, 1997 dates
to December 31, 1999. The Company must also satisfy certain other usual terms
and conditions set forth in the MIT license in order to retain its license
rights thereunder, including payment of royalties based on sale of products and
processes incorporating the licensed technology, as well as a percentage of
income derived from sublicenses of the licensed technology.



PATENTS AND PROPRIETARY RIGHTS

GENERAL

The Company has obtained rights to certain patents and patent
applications relating to its proposed products and may, in the future, seek
rights from third parties to additional patents and patent applications. The
Company also relies on trade secrets and proprietary know-how, which it seeks to
protect, in part, by confidentiality agreements with employees, consultants,
advisors, and others. For risks faced by the Company with respect to such
patents and proprietary rights, see "Risk Factors - We Have Limited Patent
Protection and May be Unable to Obtain or Retain Patents and Proprietary
Rights."

ZOMARIL-TM- (ILOPERIDONE)

The Company is the exclusive licensee under the Hoechst license of
issued and pending United States and foreign patents and patent applications
relating Iloperidone, including its use in the treatment of psychiatric
disorders, psychotic disorders and analgesia. Prosecution of various divisional
and continuation applications and their foreign counterparts continues
satisfactorily; although it is uncertain whether additional patents will be
granted. The Company has no knowledge of any matters or issues which would
appear to materially, negatively affect the validity and/or enforceability of
the claims directed to Zomaril in either the issued patents and/or the
associated counterparts that claim the priority of the U.S. patent applications.

IMMUNOTHERAPEUTICS

The Company is the exclusive licensee under the Kentucky agreement of
certain United States and foreign patents and patent applications relating to
the anti-idiotype antibodies known as 3H1, 1A7 and 11D10 and their fragments,
derivatives or analogs. In April 1997, a U.S. patent was issued for the
composition and method of use of the 1A7 antibody. Prosecution of patents
covering the 3H1 and 11D10 antibodies continues satisfactorily, as does
prosecution of various divisional and continuation applications and their
foreign counterparts, although it is uncertain whether additional patents will
be granted. The Company has no knowledge of any matters or issues which would
appear to materially, negatively affect the validity and/or enforceability of
these patent rights.

7


PIVANEX-TM-

The Company is the exclusive licensee under the Bar-Ilan agreement of
an issued United States patent and certain foreign patents, and patent
applications covering novel analogs of butyric acid. Prosecution of various
divisional and continuation applications and their foreign counterparts
continues satisfactorily; although it is uncertain whether additional patents
will be granted. The Company has no knowledge of any matters or issues which
would appear to materially, negatively affect the validity and/or enforceability
of these patent rights.


GENE THERAPY PRODUCT - RB94

The Company is the exclusive licensee under the Baylor license of
United States and foreign patent applications relating to the RB gene, including
its use in conferring senescence to tumors that form the basis of RB94.
Prosecution of patents covering RB94 continues satisfactorily, as does
prosecution of various divisional and continuation applications and their
foreign counterparts; although it is uncertain whether additional patents will
be granted.

The Company is aware of the existence of a prior art reference,
European Patent Application 0 259 031 ("EP 0 259 031"), which discloses a DNA
sequence corresponding to the sequence of the RB94 DNA molecule that is claimed
in an issued U.S. patent licensed by the Company from Baylor (the "Baylor
patent"). The Baylor patent also contains claims directed to specific expression
vectors containing these DNA molecules. Although a patent is presumed valid,
there can be no assurance that the claims of the Baylor patent, if challenged,
will not be found invalid. In any event, given that EP 0 259 031 relates to DNA
molecules but not to methods of gene therapy, the existence of this reference
alone would not, as a matter of U.S. law, be expected to affect the
patentability of claims directed to the use of the RB94 DNA molecule in gene
therapy for certain cancers, which gene therapy claims presently are pending in
a related patent application licensed by the Company from Baylor.


CELL THERAPY PRODUCTS

The Company is the exclusive licensee under the NYU license of United
States and foreign patent applications relating to the Company's cell coated
microcarrier technology. The Patent and Trademark Office has issued two U.S.
patents on the core subject material underlying the NYU license. An Australian
patent on the core material of a patent application underlying the NYU license
was granted in May 1996. Prosecution of various divisional and continuation
applications and their foreign counterparts continues satisfactorily, although
it uncertain whether additional patents will be granted.

The Company is the exclusive licensee under the South Florida agreement
of United States and foreign patent and patent applications related to Sertoli
cell technology. In December 1997, a U.S. patent was issued covering a method
for treating Parkinson's disease by stereotoxic implantation of Sertoli cells
directly into the affected area of the brain without the need for
immunosuppression. In November 1998, a U.S. patent was issued covering the use
of Sertoli cells as a facilitator in the transplantation of therapeutic cells
into the brain and spinal cord. In October 1998, a U.S. patent was issued
covering a purified and isolated Sertoli cell-secretory cell hybrid.

The Company is aware of issued U.S. patents and patent applications
relating to use of Sertoli cells in transplantation filed by Research
Corporation Technologies. These patents and applications may affect the ability
to practice certain claims in the issued South Florida patents and pending
patent applications. The Company and South Florida believe they may have certain
rights in the Research Corporation patents. The exercise of these rights will
depend on an inventorship determination, the outcome of which is uncertain at
this time.

8


IMPLANTABLE DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM

The Company is the exclusive licensee under the MIT license to three
United States and certain European patents relating to an implantable drug
delivery system. The Company has no knowledge of any matters or issues which
would appear to materially, negatively affect the validity and/or enforceability
of these patent rights.


COMPETITION

The pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries are characterized by
rapidly evolving technology and intense competition. Many companies of all
sizes, including major pharmaceutical companies and specialized biotechnology
companies, are engaged in the development and commercialization of therapeutic
agents designed for the treatment of the same diseases and disorders targeted by
the Company. Many of our competitors have substantially greater financial and
other resources, larger research and development staffs and more experience in
the regulatory approval process. Moreover, potential competitors have or may
have patent or other rights that conflict with patents covering our
technologies.

With respect to the product candidate Iloperidone, several products
categorized as atypical antipsychotics are already on the market. Specifically,
Risperidal(R) sold by Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Zyprexa(R) sold by Eli Lilly,
Clozaril(R) sold by Novartis and Seroquel(R) sold by Zeneca. Competition among
these companies is already intense and Iloperidone, expected to be the fifth or
sixth such product on the market, will face severe competition. The success of
Iloperidone will depend on how it can be differentiated from products already on
the market on the basis of efficacy, side effect profile, cost, availability of
formulations and dose requirements, among other things.

With regard to its immunotherapeutic products, the Company is aware of
several companies involved in the development of cancer therapeutics that target
the same cancers as the products under development by the Company. Such
companies include Progenics, Biomira, AltaRex, Genentech, ImClone and
Glaxo-Wellcome.

With regard to its CNS technologies, the Company is aware of several
new drugs for Parkinson's disease that are in preclinical and clinical
development. Amgen is pursuing clinical trials in Parkinson's patients with GDNF
and is collaborating with Medtronics, Inc. in its delivery to the CNS. In
addition, several well-funded public and private companies are actively pursuing
alternative cell transplant technologies, including Somatix Therapy Corporation,
CytoTherapeutics Inc. and Diacrin, Inc. The technology under development by
Diacrin, Inc. involves using antibodies to eliminate the need for
immunosuppression when transplanting fetal pig cells into Parkinson's patients,
and would directly compete with Spheramine-TM-.

With regard to its gene therapy products, the Company is aware of
several development stage and established enterprises that are exploring the
field of human gene therapy or are actively engaged in research and development
in the area of multi-drug resistance, including Genetix Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
and two research organizations receiving funding from the National Institutes of
Health. We are aware of other commercial entities that have produced gene
therapy products used in human trials. Further, it is expected that competition
in this field will intensify.

With regard to its implantable drug delivery system, the Company is
aware of an implantable therapeutic system being developed by ALZA Corporation.
Additionally, companies such as Medtronics, Inc. are developing implantable
pumps that could be used to infuse drugs into the CNS.

In addition to the foregoing, colleges, universities, governmental
agencies and other public and private research organizations are likely to
continue to conduct research and are becoming more active in seeking patent
protection and licensing arrangements to collect royalties for use of technology
that they have developed, some of which may be directly competitive with the
technologies being developed by the Company.

See "Risk Factors--We Face Intense Competition."


GOVERNMENT REGULATION

In order to obtain FDA approval of a new drug, a company generally must
submit proof of purity, potency, safety and efficacy, among others. In most
cases, such proof entails extensive clinical and preclinical laboratory tests.

9


The procedure for obtaining FDA approval to market a new drug involves
several steps. Initially, the manufacturer must conduct preclinical animal
testing to demonstrate that the product does not pose an unreasonable risk to
human subjects in clinical studies. Upon completion of such animal testing, an
IND must be filed with the FDA before clinical studies may begin. An IND
application consists of, among other things, information about the proposed
clinical trials. Among the conditions for clinical studies and IND approval is
the requirement that the prospective manufacturer's quality control and
manufacturing procedures conform to good manufacturing practices, which must be
followed at all times. Once the IND is approved (or if FDA fails to act within
30 days), the clinical trials may begin.

Human clinical trials on drugs are typically conducted in three
sequential phases, although the phases may overlap. Phase I trials typically
consist of testing the product in a small number of healthy volunteers or in
patients, primarily for safety in one or more doses. During Phase II, in
addition to safety, the efficacy of the product is evaluated in up to several
hundred patients and sometimes more. Phase III trials typically involve
additional testing for safety and efficacy in an expanded patient population at
multiple test sites. The FDA may order the temporary or permanent
discontinuation of a clinical trial at any time.

The results of the preclinical and clinical testing on new drugs are
submitted to the FDA in the form of a new drug application for new drugs. The
NDA approval process requires substantial time and effort and there can be no
assurance that any approval will be granted on a timely basis, if at all. The
FDA may refuse to approve an NDA if applicable regulatory requirements are not
satisfied. Product approvals, if granted, may be withdrawn if compliance with
regulatory standards is not maintained or problems occur following initial
marketing.

The FDA may also require post-marketing testing and surveillance of
approved products, or place other conditions on their approvals. These
requirements could cause it to be more difficult or expensive to sell the
products, and could therefore restrict the commercial applications of such
products. Product approvals may be withdrawn if compliance with regulatory
standards is not maintained or if problems occur following initial marketing.
With respect to patented products or technologies, delays imposed by the
governmental approval process may materially reduce the period during which the
Company will have the exclusive right to exploit such technologies.

In addition, the Company's gene therapy product candidate is subject to
guidelines established by NIH, covering deliberate transfers of recombinant DNA
into human subjects conducted within NIH laboratories or with NIH funds, which
provide that such products must be approved by the NIH Director. The NIH has
established the Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee which sets forth guidelines
concerning approval of NIH-supported research involving the use of recombinant
DNA. Although the jurisdiction of the NIH applies only when NIH-funded research
or facilities are involved in any aspect of the protocol, the Advisory Committee
encourages all gene transfer protocols to be submitted for its review. We intend
to comply with the Advisory Committee and NIH guidelines.

The Company believes it is in compliance with all material applicable
regulatory requirements. However, see "Risk Factors - We Must Comply with
Extensive Government Regulations " for additional risks faced by the Company
regarding regulatory requirements and compliance.


FOREIGN REGULATORY ISSUES

Sales of pharmaceutical products outside the United States are subject
to foreign regulatory requirements that vary widely from country to country.
Whether or not FDA approval has been obtained, approval of a product by a
comparable regulatory authority of a foreign country must generally be obtained
prior to the commencement of marketing in those countries. Although the time
required to obtain such approval may be longer or shorter than that required for
FDA approval, the requirements for FDA approval are among the most detailed in
the world and FDA approval generally takes longer than foreign regulatory
approvals.


EMPLOYEES

The consolidated Company currently has 24 full-time employees. None of
our employees are represented by a labor union. We have not experienced any work
stoppages and consider our relations with our employees to be good. See "Risk
Factors - We May Not Be Able to Retain Our Key Management and Scientific
Personnel."

10


RISK FACTORS

WE HAVE A HISTORY OF OPERATING LOSSES AND MAY NEVER BE PROFITABLE.
Through December 31, 1998, we had accumulated net losses since inception of
approximately $54.1 million. We will continue to incur losses for the
foreseeable future as a result of the various costs associated with our
research, development, financial, administrative, regulatory and management
activities. We may never achieve or sustain profitability.

WE WILL NEED ADDITIONAL CAPITAL. At March 15, 1999, we had working
capital of approximately $13 million which we believe will enable us to fund our
current plan of operations for at least 18 months. We will be required to seek
substantial additional financing after such time to continue our product
development activities and to commercialize any products that we may
successfully develop. We do not have any funding commitments or arrangements
other than our bank line. If we are unable to enter into a corporate
collaboration, complete a debt or equity offering, or otherwise obtain any
needed financing, we will be required to reduce, defer or discontinue our
product development programs. We may be required to obtain funds on terms that
are not favorable to us and our stockholders.

OUR PRODUCTS ARE AT AN EARLY STAGE OF DEVELOPMENT AND MAY NOT BE
SUCCESSFULLY DEVELOPED OR COMMERCIALIZED. Our proposed products are at various
stages of development, but all will require significant further clinical
development, testing and regulatory clearances prior to commercialization. We
are subject to the risk that some or all of our proposed products:

- - will be found to be ineffective or unsafe;
- - will not receive necessary regulatory clearances;
- - will not be capable of being produced in commercial quantities at
reasonable costs; or
- - will not be successfully marketed.

We may experience unanticipated problems relating to product development,
testing, regulatory compliance, manufacturing, marketing and competition, and
our costs and expenses could exceed current estimates. We cannot predict whether
we will successfully develop and commercialize any products.

WE MUST COMPLY WITH EXTENSIVE GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS. Our research,
development and pre-clinical and clinical trial activities and the manufacturing
and marketing of any products which we may successfully develop are subject to
an extensive regulatory approval process by the FDA and other regulatory
agencies in the U.S. and other countries. The process of obtaining required
regulatory approvals for drugs, including conducting preclinical and clinical
testing, is lengthy, expensive and uncertain. Even after such time and
expenditures, we may not obtain necessary regulatory approvals for clinical
testing or for the manufacturing or marketing of any products. Regulatory
approval may entail limitations on the indicated usage of a drug, which may
reduce the drug's market potential. Even if regulatory clearance is obtained,
post-market evaluation of the products, if required, could result in
restrictions on a product's marketing or withdrawal of the product from the
market as well as possible civil or criminal sanctions. We depend on
laboratories and medical institutions conducting preclinical studies and
clinical trials to maintain both good laboratory and good clinical practices. We
will also depend upon the manufacturers of any products we may successfully
develop to comply with cGMP.

In addition, we and our collaborative partners may be subject to
regulation under state and federal laws, including requirements regarding
occupational safety, laboratory practices, environmental protection and
hazardous substance control, and may be subject to other local, state, federal
and foreign regulation. We cannot predict the impact of such regulation on us,
although it could be material and adverse.

WE HAVE LIMITED PATENT PROTECTION AND MAY BE UNABLE TO OBTAIN OR RETAIN
PATENTS AND PROPRIETARY RIGHTS

Our future success will depend to a significant extent on our ability
to:

- - obtain and enforce patent protection on our products and technologies;
- - maintain trade secrets; and
- - operate and commercialize products without infringing on the patents or
proprietary rights of others.

11


Our patents may not afford any competitive advantages and may be challenged or
circumvented by third parties. Further, patents may not issue on pending patent
applications. Because of the extensive time required for development, testing
and regulatory review of a potential product, it is possible that before a
potential product can be commercialized, any related patent may expire, or
remain in existence for only a short period following commercialization,
reducing any advantage of the patent.

Our business may be materially adversely affected if we fail to obtain
and retain needed patents, licenses or proprietary information. Others may
independently develop similar technologies or duplicate any technology we
develop. Furthermore, costly and time consuming litigation may be necessary to:

- - enforce any of our patents;
- - determine the scope and validity of the patent rights of others; or
- - respond to a legal action against us claiming damages for infringement
of patent rights or other proprietary rights or seeking to enjoin
commercial activities relating to the affected product or process.

The outcome of any such litigation is highly uncertain.

To the extent that consultants, key employees or other third parties
apply technological information independently developed by them or by others to
our proposed products, disputes may arise as to the proprietary rights to such
information which may not be resolved in our favor. Most of our consultants are
employed by or have consulting agreements with third parties and any inventions
discovered by such individuals generally will not become our property. There is
a risk that other parties may breach confidentiality agreements or that our
trade secrets become known or independently discovered by competitors, which
could adversely affect us.

WE FACE INTENSE COMPETITION. Competition in the pharmaceutical and
biotechnology industries is intense and is expected to increase. We will face
competition from numerous companies that currently market, or are developing,
products for the treatment of the diseases and disorders we have targeted. Many
of these entities have significantly greater research and development
capabilities, experience in obtaining regulatory approvals and manufacturing,
marketing, financial and managerial resources than us. We also compete with
universities and other research institutions in the development of products,
technologies and processes as well as for the recruitment of highly qualified
scientific personnel. Our competitors may succeed in developing technologies or
products that are more effective than the ones we have under development or that
render our proposed products or technologies noncompetitive or obsolete. In
addition, certain of such competitors may achieve product commercialization or
patent protection earlier than us.

WE ARE DEPENDENT UPON OUR KEY COLLABORATIVE RELATIONSHIPS AND LICENSE
AND SPONSORED RESEARCH AGREEMENTS. As a small company with limited resources, we
rely significantly on the resources of third parties to conduct research and
development. For example, our ability to ultimately derive revenues from
Iloperidone is almost entirely dependent upon Novartis conducting the Phase III
trials and completing the regulatory approval process and implementing the
marketing program necessary to commercialize Iloperidone if the trials are
successful. Our success in the future will depend, in part, on our ability to
maintain existing collaborative relationships and to develop new collaborative
relationships with third parties. Our license agreements relating to the
in-licensing of technology generally require the payment of up-front license
fees and royalties based on sales with minimum annual royalties, the use of due
diligence in developing and bringing products to market, the achievement of
funding milestones and, in some cases, the grant of stock to the licensor. Our
sponsored research agreements generally require periodic payments on an annual
or quarterly basis. Some agreements also require funding or production
facilities relating to clinical research. Our failure to meet financial or other
obligations under license or sponsored research agreements in a timely manner
could result in the loss of our rights to proprietary technology or our right to
have the applicable university or institution conduct research and development
efforts.

WE WILL BE DEPENDENT ON THIRD PARTIES TO MANUFACTURE AND MARKET ANY
PRODUCTS WE MAY SUCCESSFULLY DEVELOP. To date, we have not introduced any
products on the commercial market. We do not expect to have the resources in the
foreseeable future to allocate to the manufacture or direct marketing of any
proposed products and, therefore, it is intended that collaborative arrangements
be pursued regarding the manufacture and marketing of any products that may be
successfully developed. We may be unable to enter into additional collaborative

12


arrangements to manufacture or market any proposed products or, in lieu thereof,
establish our own manufacturing operations or sales force.

WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO RETAIN OUR KEY MANAGEMENT AND SCIENTIFIC
PERSONNEL. As a small company with a limited number of personnel, we are highly
dependent on the services of Dr. Louis R. Bucalo, President and Chief Executive
Officer, as well as the other principal members of our management and scientific
staff. The loss of one or more of such individuals could substantially impair
ongoing research and development programs and could hinder our ability to obtain
corporate partners. Our success depends in large part upon our ability to
attract and retain highly qualified personnel. We compete in our hiring efforts
with other pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, as well as universities
and nonprofit research organizations, and we may have to pay higher salaries to
attract and retain personnel.

FUTURE SALES OF SHARES IN THE PUBLIC MARKET COULD ADVERSELY IMPACT OUR
STOCK PRICE. Future sales of our Common Stock by existing stockholders pursuant
to Rule 144 under the Securities Act, pursuant to an effective registration
statement or otherwise, could have an adverse effect on the market price of our
securities. All of our "restricted" shares and warrants, other than the
2,254,545 shares sold in our 1999 private placement and shares held by our
affiliates, are eligible for immediate resale in the public market under Rule
144(k) of the Securities Act. In addition, we have agreed to file a registration
statement covering the resale of the private placement shares in April 1999.


ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

The Company has a four-year lease, expiring in June 2002, for
approximately 10,000 square feet of office space in South San Francisco,
California. The monthly rental payment is $21,315. The Company also has a
four-year lease, expiring in October 2002, for approximately 4,200 square
feet of space in Somerville, New Jersey, at a monthly rental payment of
$7,100.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

The Company is not a party to any material legal proceedings.


ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

Not applicable

13


PART II


ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.

(a) PRICE RANGE OF SECURITIES

Through November 20, 1998, Titan's common stock traded on the Nasdaq
SmallCap Market under the symbol TTNP. On November 23, 1998, the common stock
began trading on the American Stock Exchange under the symbol TTP. The table
below sets forth the high and low sales prices of Titan's common stock as
reported by the Nasdaq SmallCap Market and the American Stock Exchange for the
periods indicated. For the period during which Titan was listed on the Nasdaq
SmallCap Market, prices are based on quotations between dealers, do not reflect
retail mark-up, mark-down or commissions, and do not necessarily represent
actual transactions.



High Low
---- ---

Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 1998:

First Quarter $ 5.750 $ 4.625
Second Quarter $ 6.125 $ 3.813
Third Quarter $ 5.125 $ 2.188
Fourth Quarter $ 3.938 $ 1.844

Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 1997:

First Quarter $ 9.500 $ 2.625
Second Quarter $ 4.000 $ 2.125
Third Quarter $ 5.250 $ 2.375
Fourth Quarter $ 6.688 $ 3.750


(b) APPROXIMATE NUMBER OF EQUITY SECURITY HOLDERS

The number of record holders of the Company's common stock as of March
29, 1999 was approximately 268. Based on the last ADP search, the Company
believes there are in excess of 3,000 beneficial holders of the common stock.

(c) DIVIDENDS

The Company has never paid a cash dividend on its common stock and
anticipates that for the foreseeable future any earnings will be retained for
use in its business and, accordingly, does not anticipate the payment of cash
dividends.

14


ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The selected financial data presented below summarizes certain
financial data which has been derived from and should be read in conjunction
with the more detailed financial statements of the Company and the notes thereto
included elsewhere herein. See "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations."



Years Ended December 31,
-------------------------------------------------------------
1998 1997 1996 1995 1994
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
(in thousands)

STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA:
Total revenues (1) $ --- $ 17,500 $ 259 $ 140 $ ---
Costs and expenses
Research and development 7,813 9,310 5,567 5,202 10,602
Acquired in-process research and development --- 9,500 --- 686 ---
General and administrative 3,708 6,514 5,264 3,658 2,504
Other income (expense) - net (2) 907 8,415 (2,294) (2,288) 104
Net income (loss) (10,614) 592 (12,856) (11,693) (12,974)
Basic net income (loss) per share
(pro forma in 1995) $ (0.81) $ 0.05 $ (1.67) $ (1.74) ---
Diluted net income (loss) per share $ (0.81) $ 0.04 $ (1.67) $ (1.74) ---


(1) Revenues for 1997 include $17,352,203 from up-front fees related to the
sublicense of Iloperidone to Novartis.
(2) Other income for 1997 includes a gain of $8,361,220 from the sale of a
research technology.



As of December 31,
-------------------------------------------------------------
1998 1997 1996 1995 1994
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
(in thousands)

BALANCE SHEET DATA:
Working capital (deficiency) $ 10,215 $ 23,642 $ 12,174 $ (6,232) $ (2,224)
Total assets 12,228 25,594 16,366 4,732 3,069
Long-term debt --- --- 1,200 2,036 1,011
Accumulated deficit (54,123) (43,508) (44,100) (31,244) (19,551)
Stockholders' equity (deficiency) 9,406 17,178 11,411 (5,823) (2,865)


ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS.

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the
Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this
report.

The following discussion contains certain forward-looking statements,
within the meaning of the "safe harbor" provisions of the Private Securities
Reform Act of 1995, the attainment of which involves various risks and
uncertainties. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of
forward-looking terminology such as "may," "will," "expect," "believe,"
"estimate," "anticipate," "continue," or similar terms, variations of those
terms or the negative of those terms. The Company's actual results may differ
materially from those described in these forward-looking statements due to,
among other factors, the results of ongoing research and development activities
and preclinical testing, the results of clinical trials and the availability of
additional financing through corporate partnering arrangements or otherwise.


OVERVIEW

Since its inception, the Company has devoted substantially all of its
resources to acquisition of product candidates, research and development
programs, and general and administrative expenditures needed to support these

15


activities. At December 31, 1998, the Company had an accumulated deficit of
approximately $54,100,000 and working capital of approximately $10,200,000.

The Company's most advanced product candidate, Iloperidone, is a novel
antipsychotic agent under development for the treatment of patients with
schizophrenia. Iloperidone is currently in Phase III clinical testing through a
strategic alliance with Novartis Pharma AG. Titan's cancer portfolio includes
three therapeutic cancer vaccines--CeaVac-TM-, TriAb-TM-, and TriGem-TM---that
are designed to stimulate a patient's immune system against cancer cells.
CeaVac-TM- is currently in multicenter, controlled Phase II clinical testing for
colorectal cancer. TriAb-TM- is currently in multicenter, controlled Phase II
clinical testing for breast cancer. TriGem-TM- has completed Phase I testing in
melanoma and the Company is pursuing additional clinical trials through
co-operative groups. The Company is also currently conducting a Phase II
clinical trial with Pivanex-TM-, a novel synthetic analog of butyric acid, for
the treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Additionally, Titan
is developing a unique cell based therapeutic, Spheramine-TM- for the treatment
of patients with Parkinson's disease. During 1999, the Company expects to begin
a Phase I/II clinical testing with Spheramine-TM-. Other programs at Titan in
preclinical development include a gene therapy product and an implantable drug
delivery technology.


RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND 1997

There were no revenues for the year ended December 31, 1998 compared to
$17,500,000 for the year ended December 31, 1997. Total revenues for 1997 were
comprised of approximately $17,350,000 from one time, up-front fees related to
the license of Iloperidone to Novartis and $148,000 from U.S. government grants.

From inception through December 31, 1998, research and development
expenses totaled $54,890,000, and general and administrative expenses totaled
$22,050,000. Research and development expenses for 1998 were $7,813,000, as
compared to $18,810,000 for 1997, a decrease of $10,997,000, or 58%. 1997
includes $9,500,000 of acquired in-process research and development expense
related to the acquisition of Iloperidone, the development of which is now
being funded by Novartis pursuant to the partnering agreement established by
Titan and Novartis in November 1997. General and administrative expenses for
1998 were $3,708,000, as compared to $6,514,000 for 1997, a decrease of
$2,806,000, or 43%. The decrease is attributable to the merger of a former
subsidiary with and into the Company in August 1997, with a subsequent
reduction in personnel and other expenses, as well as the reduction in
overhead associated with the sale of a research technology by Ingenex in June
1997.

Other income for 1998 was $907,000 compared with $8,415,000 for 1997.
Other income for 1998 includes interest income of $848,000. Other income for
1997 includes a gain of approximately $8,361,000 from the sale of a research
technology, and interest income of $666,000. Interest expense decreased to
approximately $200 during 1998 from $227,000 during 1997. Other income for 1997
also includes losses of approximately $591,000 representing the Company's share
of the losses of Ansan Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a former subsidiary of the
Company.

As a result of the foregoing, the Company had a net loss of $10,614,000
during 1998 compared to net income of $592,000 during 1997.

None of the Company's products have been commercialized, and the
Company does not expect to generate any revenue from product sales for the
foreseeable future. The Company also expects that general and administrative
costs necessary to support such research and development activities will
continue at the present rate. The Company will also seek to identify new
technologies and/or product candidates for possible in-licensing or acquisition.
Accordingly, the Company expects to incur increasing operating losses for the
foreseeable future. There can be no assurance that the Company will ever achieve
profitable operations.

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND 1996

Total revenues were $17,500,000 for 1997 and $259,000 for the year
ended December 31, 1996. The increase was attributable to one time, up-front
fees related to the license of Iloperidone to Novartis.

Research and development expenses for 1997 were $18,810,000 (including
$9,500,000 of acquired in-process research and development), as compared to
$5,567,000 for 1996, an increase of $13,243,000 or 238%. The increase resulted
from the expansion of the Company's development activities, including the
acquisition and further

16


development of Iloperidone.

General and administrative expenses for 1997 were $6,514,000, as
compared to $5,264,000 for 1996, an increase of $1,250,000, or 24%. This
increase reflects additional administrative support for the Company's expanded
development activities.

Other income includes interest income of $666,000 during 1997 as
compared to $716,000 during 1996. Interest expense was $227,000 during 1997 as
compared to $2,011,000 during 1996. Approximately $1,408,000 of the 1996 expense
reflects a non-recurring charge due to the repayment in January 1996 of notes
issued in a bridge financing. This non-recurring charge represents the
unamortized portion of the $1,800,000 debt discount and $458,000 of debt
issuance costs relating to the bridge notes. Other income for 1997 and 1996 also
includes $591,000 and $999,000, respectively, of losses representing the
Company's share of the losses of Ansan.

The Company had net income of $592,000 during 1997 compared with a net
loss of $12,856,000 during 1996.

Upon completion of the Company's initial public offering in January
1996, the Company's previously outstanding shares of preferred stock were
converted automatically into shares of common stock at adjusted conversion
prices per common share less than the public offering price per common share.
The deemed benefit to the preferred stockholders approximated $5,400,000, which
deemed benefit was recorded by offsetting charges and credits to additional
paid-in capital at the time of conversion. There was no effect on net loss from
the mandatory conversion. However, the amount increased the loss allocable to
common stock in the calculation of net loss per share in the period of the
conversion.


IMPACT OF YEAR 2000

GENERAL

The "Year 2000 Issue" is the result of computer programs being written
using two digits rather than four to define the applicable year. Computer
programs or hardware that have date-sensitive software or embedded chips may
recognize a date using "00" as the year 1900 rather than the year 2000. This
could result in a system failure or miscalculations causing disruptions of
operations, including, among other things, a temporary inability to process
transactions, or engage in similar normal business activities.

SYSTEM ASSESSMENT

Titan is a relatively young company, incorporated in 1992, and most of
its Information Technology ("IT") and Non-IT systems were Year 2000 compliant
when purchased. The Company believes, therefore, it will not be required to
implement significant modifications or replace significant portions of its
software and hardware in order to be Year 2000 compliant. The Company is,
however, taking steps to ensure that the Year 2000 Issue does not have a
material impact on the operation of the Company.

Significant functions related to the Company's clinical trials are
carried out by contract research organizations ("CRO's"). These functions
include, but are not limited to, clinical study monitoring, biostatistics, data
management and drug manufacturing. To the extent that the systems of CRO's
produce incorrect information or cause incorrect interpretation of the
information that they produce, the Company is at risk for making invalid
conclusions about the nature, efficacy, or safety of its products or
technologies which could lead to abandoning potentially lucrative products or
technologies or invalidly continuing development and pursuing FDA approval of
others. The Company is in the process of contacting its significant suppliers
and CRO's and requesting that they provide certificates of compliance with
relation to this issue. At this time the Company is not aware of any suppliers
or CRO's with a Year 2000 Issue that would materially impact the Company's
results of operations, liquidity, or capital resources. However, the Company has
no means of ensuring that its suppliers or CRO's will be Year 2000 ready. The
inability of its suppliers or CRO's to complete their Year 2000 resolution
process in a timely fashion could materially impact the Company. The effect of
non-compliance by other external agents is not determinable.

COSTS AND CONTINGENCIES

To date, the Company has expended only internal costs to assess the
Year 2000 Issue. Letters of Year 2000 compliance from internal software
providers tend to indicate that the Company will not be exposed to any material
expenditures for replacements of such systems, however there can be no assurance
of this. Also, it is not yet possible to

17


ascertain if any expenditure will be required to replace systems,
subcontractors or the work performed by such subcontractors. While vendor
assurances and internal testing are useful in assessing Year 2000 issues,
neither can provide absolute assurance that no Year 2000 problems will or can
occur. During 1999, the Company will continue to refine its plans in an
attempt to assure the Year 2000 Issue will not materially adversely affect
their business operations or financial condition.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

The Company has funded its operations from inception primarily through
private placements of its securities, as well as the IPO. During 1997, the
Company also received approximately $25,861,000 from up-front license fees
related to the Novartis sublicense and the sale of a research technology.

In January 1999, the Company completed a private placement of 2,254,545
shares of its Common Stock for net proceeds of approximately $5,790,000, after
deducting fees and commissions and other expenses of the offering.

In November 1998, the Company agreed to guarantee certain debt
obligations of the Company's Chief Executive Officer. Under said guarantee, the
Company may be obligated to make a payment of up to $400,000. The Company's
Chief Executive Officer has pledged approximately 300,000 shares of the
Company's common stock, owned by the Chief Executive Officer, to secure the
debt.

In January 1997, the Company entered into an exclusive license
agreement with Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc., ("Hoechst") pursuant to which the
Company received the worldwide patent rights and know-how related to the
antipsychotic agent Iloperidone. The Company paid, during 1997, an up-front
license fee consisting of: (i) $4,000,000 in cash and (ii) $5,500,000 through
the issuance of 594,595 shares of common stock (the "Hoechst Shares".) The
Company was obligated to pay to the difference between $5,500,000 and the net
proceeds received by Hoechst upon sale of the Hoechst Shares. In February 1998,
Hoechst received net proceeds of approximately $2,456,000 upon sale of the
Hoechst Shares. Accordingly, in March 1998, the Company paid to Hoechst
approximately $3,044,000.

Titan has entered into various agreements with research institutions,
universities, and other entities for the performance of research and development
activities and for the acquisition of licenses related to those activities. The
aggregate commitments the Company has under these agreements, including minimum
license payments, for the next 12 months is approximately $3,000,000. Certain of
the licenses provide for the payment of royalties by the Company on future
product sales, if any. In addition, in order to maintain license and other
rights while products are under development, the Company must comply with
customary licensee obligations, including the payment of patent related costs
and meeting project-funding milestones.

The Company expects to continue to incur substantial additional
operating losses from costs related to continuation and expansion of research
and development, clinical trials, and increased administrative and fund raising
activities over at least the next several years. To preserve operating capital,
the Company has chosen to strategically focus on development of its later stage
products in clinical development, and at least temporarily reduce or eliminate
spending on certain preclinical programs. While the Company has sufficient
working capital to sustain planned operations for a period greater than 12
months, the Company may seek additional financing sooner, depending on numerous
factors including, but not limited to, the progress of the Company's research
and development programs, the results of clinical studies, technological
advances, determinations as to the commercial potential of the Company's
products, and the status of competitive products. In May 1998, the Company
negotiated a $5,000,000 bank line of credit. To date the Company has not
borrowed against this facility. In addition, certain expenditures will be
dependent on the establishment of collaborative relationships with other
companies, the availability of financing, and other factors. In any event, the
Company anticipates that it will require substantial additional financing in the
future. There can be no assurance as to the availability or terms of any
required additional financing, when and if needed.


ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The Company has reviewed the requirements of Item 7A and has determined
that these disclosures are not applicable.

18


ITEM 8. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.

The response to this item is included in a separate section of this
Report. See "Index to Consolidated Financial Statements" on Page F-1.

ITEM 9. CHANGES AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL
DISCLOSURE.

Not applicable.

19


ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF REGISTRANT.

The following table sets forth the names, ages and positions of the
executive officers and directors of the Company.



Name Age Position
- ---- --- --------

Louis R. Bucalo, M.D.(1) 40 President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
Sunil Bhonsle 49 Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
Richard C. Allen, Ph.D. 56 Executive Vice President
Robert E. Farrell 49 Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Victor Bauer, Ph.D. 63 Executive Director; Corporate Development and Director
Eurelio M. Cavalier 66 Director
Michael K. Hsu (2) 50 Director
Hubert Huckel, M.D.(1)(3) 67 Director
Marvin E. Jaffe, M.D.(1)(3) 62 Director
Konrad M. Weis, Ph.D.(1) 70 Director
Kenneth J. Widder, M.D.(1)(3) 46 Director
Ernst-Gunter Afting, M.D., Ph.D.(2) 56 Director


- -----------------------------------------
(1) Member of Executive Committee
(2) Member of Audit Committee
(3) Member of Compensation Committee

LOUIS R. BUCALO, M.D. is a founder of the Company and has served as the
Company's President and Chief Executive Officer since January 1993. Dr. Bucalo
has served as a director of the Company since March 1993. From July 1990 to
April 1992, Dr. Bucalo was Associate Director of Clinical Research at Genentech,
Inc., a biotechnology company. Dr. Bucalo holds an M.D. from Stanford University
and a B.A. in biochemistry from Harvard University.

SUNIL BHONSLE joined the Company as Executive Vice President and Chief
Operating Officer in September 1995. Mr. Bhonsle served in various positions,
including Vice President and General Manager-Plasma Supply and Manager-Inventory
and Technical Planning, at Bayer Corporation from July 1975 until April 1995.
Mr. Bhonsle holds an M.B.A. from the University of California at Berkeley and a
B.Tech. in chemical engineering from the Indian Institute of Technology.

RICHARD C. ALLEN, PH.D., joined the Company as Executive Vice President
in August 1995. From January 1995 until it was merged into Titan in March 1999,
he also served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Theracell. From June
1991 until December 1994, Dr. Allen was Vice President and General Manager of
the Neuroscience Strategic Business Unit of Hoechst-Roussel Pharmaceuticals,
Inc. Dr. Allen holds a Ph.D. in medicinal chemistry and a B.S. in pharmacy from
the Medical College of Virginia.

ROBERT E. FARRELL joined the Company as Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer in September 1996. Mr. Farrell was employed by Fresenius
USA, Inc. from 1991 until August 1996 where he served in various capacities,
including Vice President Administration, Chief Financial Officer and General
Counsel. His last position was Corporate Group Vice President. Mr. Farrell holds
a B.A. from University of Notre Dame and a J.D. from Hastings College of Law,
University of California.

VICTOR J. BAUER, PH.D., has served as a director of the Company since
November 1997. Dr. Bauer joined the Company in February 1997, and currently
serves as Executive Director of Corporate Development. From April 1996 until its
merger into Titan, Dr. Bauer also served as a director and Chairman of
Theracell. From December 1992 until February 1997, Dr. Bauer was a self-employed
consultant to companies in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries.
Prior to that time, Dr. Bauer was with Hoechst-Roussel Pharmaceuticals Inc.,
where he served as President from 1988 through 1992.

20


EURELIO M. CAVALIER has served as a director of the Company since
September 1998. From 1958 until his retirement in 1994, Mr. Cavalier was
employed in various capacities by Eli Lilly & Co., serving as Vice President
Sales from 1976 to 1982 and Group Vice President U.S. Pharmaceutical Business
Unit from 1982 to 1993. Mr. Cavalier currently serves on the Boards of Directors
of DataChem, Inc., ProSolv, Inc. and St. Vincent Hospital. He serves on the
Advisory Board of COR Therapeutics and Indiana Heart Institute.

MICHAEL K. HSU has served as a director of the Company since March
1993. He is currently a General Partner of EndPoint Merchant Group, a
Merchant Bank specializing in making investments into the healthcare and life
science industries. Mr. Hsu has served as Director-Corporate Finance of
National Securities Corp. since November 1995 and from November 1994 through
October 1995 with Coleman & Company Securities in the same capacity. Mr. Hsu
previously held various executive positions with Steinberg and Lyman Health
Care Company, Ventana Venture Growth Fund, Asian Pacific Venture Group
(Thailand) and D. Blech Life Science Ventures.

HUBERT HUCKEL, M.D. has served as a director of the Company since
October 1995. From 1964 until his retirement in December 1992, Dr. Huckel served
in various positions with The Hoechst Group. At the time of his retirement, he
was Chairman of the Board of Hoechst-Roussel Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Chairman and
President of Hoechst-Roussel Agri-Vet Company and a member of the Executive
Committee of Hoechst Celanese Corporation. He currently serves on the Board of
Directors of Thermogenesis, Corp. and Gynetics, Inc.

MARVIN E. JAFFE, M.D. has served as a director of the Company since
October 1995. From 1988 until April 1994, Dr. Jaffe served as President of R.W.
Johnson Pharmaceutical Research Institute where he was responsible for the
research and development activities in support of a number of Johnson & Johnson
companies, including ORTHO-McNeil Pharmaceuticals, ORTHO Biotech and CILAG. From
1970 until 1988, he was Senior Vice President of the Merck Research
Laboratories. He currently serves on the Boards of Directors of Chiroscience,
plc, Immunomedics, Inc., Matrix Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Vanguard Medica, plc.

KONRAD M. WEIS, PH.D., has served as a director of the Company since
March 1993. Dr. Weis is the former President and Chief Executive Officer of
Bayer Corporation. Dr. Weis serves as a director of PNC Equity Management
Company, Michael Baker Corporation, Visible Genetics, Inc. and Demegen, Inc.

KENNETH J. WIDDER, M.D. has served as a director of the Company since
March 1993. Dr. Widder is the former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
Molecular Biosystems, Inc. Dr. Widder currently is a general partner of
Windamere Venture Partners.

ERNST-GUNTER AFTING, M.D., PH.D., has served as a director of the
Company since May 1996. Dr. Afting has served as the President of the
GSF-National Center for Environment and Health, a government research center in
Germany, since 1995. From 1984 until 1995, he was employed in various capacities
by the Hoechst Group, serving as Divisional Head of the Pharmaceuticals Division
of the Hoechst Group from 1991 to 1993 and as President and Chief Executive
Officer of Roussel Uclaf (a majority stockholder of Hoechst AG) in Paris from
1993 until 1995.

Directors serve until the next annual meeting or until their successors
are elected and qualified. Officers serve at the discretion of the Board of
Directors, subject to rights, if any, under contracts of employment. See "Item
11 - Executive Compensation - Employment Agreements."

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

In lieu of cash compensation, non-employee directors are now entitled
to receive annual options to purchase 10,000 shares of common stock vesting
quarterly as fees for the Board of Directors meetings, and are reimbursed for
their expenses in attending such meetings. Directors are not precluded from
serving the Company in any other capacity and receiving compensation therefor.
In addition, directors are entitled to receive options ("Director Options")
pursuant to the Company's 1995 Stock Option Plan. In July 1998, each of the
Company's current directors other than Dr. Bauer received Director Options to
purchase 5,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $4.14 per share.
Eurelio Cavalier received Director Options to purchase 10,000 shares of common
stock at an exercise price of $2.47 per share when he joined the Board of
Directors in September 1998.

During 1997, Dr. Huckel received $155,000 in consulting fees for
services rendered in connection with the Company's licensing of Iloperidone from
Hoecsht. See "Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions."

21


BOARD COMMITTEES AND DESIGNATED DIRECTORS

The Board of Directors has an Executive Committee, a Compensation
Committee and an Audit Committee. The Executive Committee exercises all the
power and authority of the Board of Directors in the management of the Company
between Board meetings, to the extent permitted by law. The Compensation
Committee makes recommendations to the Board concerning salaries and incentive
compensation for officers and employees of the Company and may administer the
Company's stock option plans. The Audit Committee reviews the results and scope
of the audit and other accounting related matters.

The Board of Directors met four times during 1998 and also took action
by unanimous written consent. The Executive Committee met one time and also took
action by unanimous written consent, and the Compensation Committee and Audit
Committee each met one time. Each of the current directors of the Company
attended at least 75% of the aggregate of (i) the meetings of the Board of
Directors and (ii) meetings of any Committees of the Board on which such person
served which were held during the time such person served.

COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
requires the Company's executive officers, directors and persons who
beneficially own more than 10% of a registered class of the Company's equity
securities to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission initial reports
of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of common stock and other
equity securities of the Company. Such executive officers, directors, and
greater than 10% beneficial owners are required by SEC regulation to furnish the
Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms filed by such reporting persons.

Based solely on the Company's review of such forms furnished to the
Company and written representations from certain reporting persons, the Company
believes that all filing requirements applicable to the Company's executive
officers, directors and greater than 10% beneficial owners were complied with.

22


ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

The following summary compensation table sets forth the aggregate
compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to the Chief Executive Officer and
to executive officers whose annual compensation exceeded $100,000 for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 1998 (collectively, the "named executive officers") for
services during the fiscal years ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996:


SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE



Annual Compensation
-------------------
Name and Principal Position Year Salary Bonus
- --------------------------- ---- ------------ -----

Louis R. Bucalo........................... 1998 $243,100 $ 0
President and Chief Executive Officer 1997 $231,525 $58,721 (1)
1996 $210,000 $42,000

Sunil Bhonsle............................. 1998 $194,800 $ 0
Executive Vice President and 1997 $190,991 $68,370 (1)
Chief Operating Officer 1996 $185,000 $ 9,250

Richard C. Allen.......................... 1998 $197,800 $ 0
Executive Vice President (2) 1997 $193,984 $77,096 (1)
1996 $185,000 $15,500

Robert Farrell............................ 1998 $190,400 $ 0
Executive Vice President and 1997 $186,665 $18,500
Chief Financial Officer 1996 $ 53,958 $ 0

- ------------
(1) Bonuses pertain to fiscal year 1995 and were paid in 1997.
(2) Dr. Allen also served as President and Chief Executive Officer of
Theracell and President and Chief Operating Officer of ProNeura during
these periods. Dr. Allen received his entire salary from Theracell.
Dr. Allen's bonus included $20,000 paid by Titan.

OPTION GRANTS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR

The following table contains information concerning the stock option
grants made to the named executive officers during the fiscal year ended
December 31, 1998. No stock appreciation rights were granted to these
individuals during such year.



Number of Individual Grant
Securities -----------------------------------------------------
Underlying % of Total
Options Options Granted Exercise or
Granted to Employees Base Price Expiration
Name (#) Fiscal Year ($/Sh) (1) Date
- ---- ------------- --------------- ---------------- -------------

Richard C. Allen...................... 33,300 3.0% $5.30 06/10/2008
Richard C. Allen (2).................. 61,961 5.6% $7.50 07/31/2006
Louis R. Bucalo....................... 59,200 5.4% $5.30 06/10/2008
Louis R. Bucalo (2)................... 433,088 39.3% $7.50 07/31/2006
Louis R. Bucalo....................... 5,000 0.5% $4.14 07/25/2008
Sunil R. Bhonsle...................... 41,600 3.8% $5.30 06/10/2008
Sunil R. Bhonsle (2).................. 175,086 15.9% $7.50 07/31/2006
Robert E. Farrell..................... 22,900 2.1% $5.30 06/10/2008
Robert E. Farrell (2)................. 150,000 13.7% $7.50 07/31/2006


23

- -------------------
(1) The exercise price may be paid in cash, in shares of common stock
valued at the fair market value on the exercise date or through a
cashless exercise procedure involving a same-day sale of the purchase
shares. The Company may also finance the option exercise by loaning the
optionee sufficient funds to pay the exercise price for the purchased
shares, together with any federal and state income tax liability
incurred by the optionee in connection with such exercise.
(2) Represents the repricing of options originally granted in 1996. See
"10-Year Options/SAR Repricings".


AGGREGATE OPTION EXERCISES IN LAST FISCAL YEAR AND FISCAL YEAR-END OPTION VALUES

The following table sets forth information concerning option exercises
and option holdings for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998 with respect to
the named executive officers. No stock appreciation rights were exercised during
such year or were outstanding at the end of that year.



Number of Securities Value of
Underlying Unexercised Unexercised in-the-Money
Shares Options at FY-End (#) Options at FY-End(1)
Acquired ---------------------- ------------------------
Name on Exercise(#) Exercisable Unexercisable Exercisable Unexercisable
- ---- -------------- ----------- ------------- ----------- -------------

Louis R. Bucalo.......... -0- 475,299 219,844 $264,027 $ 1,400
Sunil Bhonsle............ -0- 248,971 125,728 (2) $185,410 $ 99,838 (2)
Richard C. Allen......... -0- 120,401 46,466 (2) $101,419 $ 41,204 (2)
Robert Farrell........... -0- 99,775 73,125 $ 0 $ 0

- ----------------
(1) Based on the fair market value of the Company's common stock at
year-end, $3.813 per share, less the exercise price payable for such
shares.
(2) A portion of employee's options are immediately exercisable. Upon the
employee's cessation of service, the Company has the right to
repurchase any shares acquired pursuant to said grant. The Company's
right to repurchase shares expires in equal monthly installments over
the five year period commencing on the date of grant. Options to which
the Company's repurchase right has not expired are deemed unexercisable
for purposes of this table.


10-YEAR OPTIONS/SAR REPRICINGS

The following table sets forth information concerning option repricings
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998 with respect to the named executive
officers.



Number of Market Length of
Securities Price of Exercise Original Option
Underlying Stock at Price at Term Remaining
Options Time of Time of New at Date of
Repriced or Repricing or Repricing or Exercise Repricing or
Name Amended Amendment Amendment Price Amendment
- ---- ----------- ------------ ------------ -------- ---------------

Louis R. Bucalo,
President and CEO....... 433,088 $4.75 $10.75 $7.50 97 Months
Sunil R. Bhonsle, Exec.
Vice President/COO....... 175,086 $4.75 $10.75 $7.50 97 Months
Richard C. Allen, Exec.
Vice President.......... 61,961 $4.75 $10.75 $7.50 97 Months
Robert E. Farrell, Exec.
Vice President/CFO...... 150,000 $4.75 $11.625 $7.50 98 Months


24


EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS

The Company is a party to an employment agreement with Dr. Bucalo
expiring in February 2001 and provides for a base annual salary of $210,000,
subject to annual increases of 5% and bonuses of up to 25% at the discretion of
the Board of Directors. In the event of the termination of the agreement with
Dr. Bucalo, other than for reasons specified therein, the Company is obligated
to make severance payments equal to his base annual salary for the greater of
the balance of the term of the agreement or 18 months.

Employment agreements with each of Dr. Allen, Mr. Bhonsle and Mr.
Farrell provide for a base annual salary of $185,000 subject to automatic annual
increases based on increases in the consumer price index, and bonuses of up to
20% at the discretion of the Board of Directors. In the event the employee's
employment is terminated other than for "good cause" (as defined), the Company
is obligated to make severance payments equal to the base annual salary for six
months. All of the agreements contain confidentiality provisions.

In order to preserve its cash resources, the Company has determined and
the executives have agreed that the 1999 salaries of Drs. Bucalo and Allen and
Messrs. Bhonsle and Farrell will be at $219,000, $178,000, $178,000 and
$171,000, respectively.


ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT.

The following table sets forth, as of March 29, 1999, certain
information concerning the beneficial ownership of the Company's common stock by
(i) each shareholder known by the Company to own beneficially five percent or
more of the outstanding common stock of the Company; (ii) each director; (iii)
each executive officer of the Company; and (iv) all executive officers and
directors of the Company as a group, and their percentage ownership and voting
power.



Shares Beneficially Percent of Shares
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner (1) Owned (2) Beneficially Owned
- ---------------------------------------- ------------------- ------------------

Louis R. Bucalo, M.D........................................ 897,480 (3) 5.6%
Ernst-Gunter Afting, M.D., Ph.D............................. 8,500 (4) *
Richard C. Allen, Ph.D...................................... 258,481 (5) 1.7%
Victor J. Bauer, Ph.D....................................... 34,644 (6) *
Sunil Bhonsle............................................... 356,189 (7) 2.3%
Robert Farrell.............................................. 145,854 (8) *
Michael K. Hsu.............................................. 33,618 (9) *
Hubert Huckel, M.D.......................................... 118,500 (10) *
Marvin E. Jaffe, M.D........................................ 8,500 (4) *
Konrad M. Weis, Ph.D........................................ 79,852 (11) *
Kenneth J. Widder, M.D...................................... 21,237 (12) *
Invesco Trust Company....................................... 1,220,538 (13) 7.9%
7800 E. Union Avenue
Denver, CO 80237
BVF Partners LP............................................. 1,841,921 (14) 11.9%
227 W. Monroe Street, Suite 4800
Chicago, IL 60606
All executive officers and directors
as a group (11) persons................................. 1,962,855 11.7%

- ------------------
*Less than one percent.

(1) Unless otherwise indicated, the address of such individual is c/o Titan
Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 400 Oyster Point Boulevard, Suite 505, South San
Francisco, California 94080.

(2) In computing the number of shares beneficially owned by a person and
the percentage ownership of a person, shares of common stock of the
Company subject to options held by that person that are currently
exercisable or

25


exercisable within 60 days are deemed outstanding. Such shares,
however, are not deemed outstanding for purposes of computing
the percentage ownership of each other person. Except as indicated in
the footnotes to this table and pursuant to applicable community
property laws, the persons named in the table have sole voting and
investment power with respect to all shares of common stock.

(3) Includes 597,249 shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options.

(4) Represents shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options.

(5) Includes 253,481 shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options.

(6) Includes 29,644 shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options.

(7) Includes 339,189 shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options.

(8) Includes 135,854 shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options.

(9) Includes 13,617 shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options.

(10) Includes 8,500 shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options.
Includes 100,000 shares held by a family partnership for which Dr.
Huckel serves as general partner.

(11) Includes 35,617 shares issuable upon exercise of warrants and
outstanding options.

(12) Includes 13,617 shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options.

(13) Represents shares held by three mutual funds managed by Invesco Funds
Group, Inc. or Invesco Trust Company.

(14) Includes 1,729,546 shares held by (i) Biotechnology Value Fund LP, for
which BVF Partners LP serves as general partner and (ii) three
investment accounts managed by BVF Partners LP.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS.

In June and July of 1997, Dr. Hubert Huckel, a director of the Company,
received an aggregate of $155,000 in consulting fees for services rendered in
connection with the Company's consummation of the Iloperidone license. Dr.
Huckel was paid pursuant to a consulting agreement which provided for the
payment of fees based upon a percentage of the up-front consideration paid
by the Company upon completion of a licensing transaction with Dr. Huckel's
assistance. The consulting agreement expired by its terms in January 1998.

In November 1998, the Company agreed to guarantee certain debt
obligations of the Company's Chief Executive Officer. Under said guarantee, the
Company may be obligated to make a payment of up to $400,000. The Company's
Chief Executive Officer has pledged approximately 300,000 shares of the
Company's common stock, owned by the Chief Executive Officer, to secure the
debt.

In January 1999, the Company completed a private placement of 2,254,545
shares of its Common Stock. Dr. Hubert Huckel and Michael Hsu, directors of the
Company, participated in the offering by purchasing 100,000 and 5,272 shares,
respectively.

The Company believes that all of the transactions set forth above were
made on terms no less favorable to the Company than could have been obtained
from unaffiliated third parties. The Company has adopted a policy that all
future transactions, including loans, between the Company and its officers,
directors, principal shareholders and their affiliates will be approved by a
majority of the Board of Directors, including a majority of the independent and
disinterested outside directors on the Board of Directors, and will continue to
be on terms no less favorable to the Company than could be obtained from
unaffiliated third parties.

26


PART IV

ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

(a) 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

An index to Consolidated Financial Statements appears on page F-1.

2. SCHEDULES

All financial statement schedules are omitted because they are
not applicable, not required under the instructions or all the information
required is set forth in the financial statements or notes thereto.

3. EXHIBITS


3.1 - Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant(1)
3.2 - Form of Amendment to Restated Certificate of Incorporation of
the Registrant(1)
3.3 - By-laws of the Registrant(1)
4.3 - Form of Warrant Agreement(1)
4.4 - Form of Underwriter's Unit Purchase Option(1)
4.5 - Form of Investor Rights Agreement between the Registrant and
the holders of Series A and Series B Preferred Stock(1)
4.6 - Form of Placement Agent's Unit Purchase Option(4)
4.7 - Certificate of Designation of Series C Preferred Stock(8)
4.8 - Certificate of Designation of Series D Preferred Stock(8)
10.1 - 1993 Stock Option Plan(1)
10.2 - 1995 Stock Option Plan(1)
10.3 - Employment Agreement between the Registrant and Louis Bucalo
dated February 1, 1993, amended as of February 3, 1994(1)
10.4 - Employment Agreement between Registrant and Richard Allen
dated July 28, 1995(1)
10.5 - Employment Agreement between Registrant and Sunil Bhonsle
dated August 6, 1995(1)
10.6 - Form of Indemnification Agreement(1)
*10.9 - MDR Exclusive License Agreement between Ingenex, Inc.
(formerly Pharm-Gen Systems Ltd.) and the Board of Trustees of
the University of Illinois dated May 6, 1992(1)
*10.11 - License Agreement between Theracell, Inc. and New York
University dated November 20, 1992, as amended as of February
23, 1993 and as of February 25, 1995(1)
*10.12 - License Agreement between the Registrant and the Massachusetts
Institute of Technology dated September 28, 1995(1)
*10.14 - Exclusive License Agreement between Ingenex, Inc. and the
Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois, dated July 1,
1994(1)
*10.15 - Exclusive License Agreement between Ingenex, Inc. and the
Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois, dated
July 1, 1994(1)
*10.16 - License Agreement between Ingenex, Inc. and the Massachusetts
Institute of Technology, dated September 11, 1992(1)
*10.17 - License Agreement between Ingenex, Inc. and Baylor College of
Medicine, dated October 21, 1992(1)
10.18 - Lease for Registrant's facilities(2)
*10.19 - License Agreement between Theracell, Inc. and the University
of South Florida dated March 15, 1996(3)
*10.20 - License Agreement between Trilex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(formerly Ascalon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) and the University of
Kentucky Research Foundation dated May 30, 1996(4)
*10.22 - License Agreement between the Registrant and Hoechst Marion
Roussel, Inc. effective as of December 31, 1996(5)


27



10.23 - Employment Agreement between Registrant and Robert E. Farrell
dated August 9, 1996(5)
10.24 - Financing Agreement between the Registrant and Ansan
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. dated March 21, 1997(6)
10.25 - Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Assets between the
Registrant and Pharmaceuticals Product Development, Inc. dated
June 4, 1997(6)
*10.27 - License Agreement between the Registrant and Bar-Ilan Research
and Development Company Limited effective November 25, 1997(7)
10.28 - License Agreement between the Registrant and Ansan
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. dated November 24, 1997(7)
10.29 - Stock Purchase Agreement between the Registrant and Ansan
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. effective November 25, 1997(7)
*10.30 - Sublicense Agreement between the Registrant and Novartis
Pharma AG dated November 20, 1997(7)
10.31 - 1998 Stock Option Plan
23.1 - Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors
27.1 - Financial Data Schedule

- -----------
* Confidential treatment has been granted with respect to portions of
this exhibit.
(1) Incorporated by reference from the Registrant's Registration Statement
on Form SB-2 (File No. 33-99386).
(2) Incorporated by reference from the Registrant's Annual Report on Form
10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 1995.
(3) Incorporated by reference from the Registrant's Quarterly Report on
Form 10-QSB for the period March 31, 1996.
(4) Incorporated by reference from the Registrant's Registration Statement
on Form SB-2 (File No. 333-13469).
(5) Incorporated by reference from the Registrant's Annual Report on Form
10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 1996.
(6) Incorporated by reference from the Registrant's Quarterly Report on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 1997.
(7) Incorporated by reference from the Registrant's Registration Statement
on Form S-3 (File No. 333-42367).
(8) Incorporated by reference from the Registrant's Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997.

(b) REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

No reports on Form 8-K were filed during the fourth quarter of 1998.

28


TITAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



PAGE
----

REPORT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS....................................... F-2

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS......................................................... F-3

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS............................................... F-4

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (NET CAPITAL DEFICIENCY)............. F-5

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS............................................... F-9

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.......................................... F-11


F-1


REPORT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Titan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Titan
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (a development stage company) as of December 31, 1998 and
1997, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders'
equity (net capital deficiency), and cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 1998 and for the period from July 25, 1991
(commencement of operations) to December 31, 1998. These financial statements
are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly,
in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Titan
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (a development stage company) at December 31, 1998 and
1997, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each
of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1998 and for the period from
July 25, 1991 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 1998, in conformity
with generally accepted accounting principles.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Palo Alto, California
February 12, 1999


F-2

TITAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS


December 31,
---------------------------------------
1998 1997
------------------- -----------------

Assets
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents $ 11,654,896 $ 24,386,872
Short-term investments - 500,000
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 139,958 58,937
License fee receivable - 371,793
------------------- -----------------
Total current assets 11,794,854 25,317,602
Furniture and equipment, net 416,956 253,723
Other assets 15,783 22,898
=================== =================
$ 12,227,593 $ 25,594,223
=================== =================

Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable $ 410,235 $ 815,449
Accrued legal fees 108,393 244,486
Accrued clinical trials expense 653,218 -
Accrued payroll and related 182,647 257,751
Accrued professional and accounting fees 125,730 100,000
Other accrued liabilities 100,000 257,987
------------------- -----------------
Total current liabilities 1,580,223 1,675,673
Commitments
Minority interest - Series B preferred stock of Ingenex, Inc. 1,241,032 1,241,032
Guaranteed security value (Note 12) - 5,500,000
Stockholders' Equity
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value per share; 5,000,000 shares authorized,
issuable in series:
Series C, 222,400 shares designated, 222,400 shares issued
and outstanding, with a liquidation preference
of $0.01 per share, at December 31, 1998 and 1997 - -
Series D, 606,061 shares designated, 606,061 shares issued
and outstanding, with a liquidation preference
of $0.05 per share, at December 31, 1998 and 1997 5,000,000 5,000,000
Common stock, $0.001 par value per share; 50,000,000
shares authorized at December 31, 1998 and 1997; 13,123,508 and
13,052,514 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 1998 and
1997, respectively, at amount paid in 52,291,369 49,622,796
Additional paid-in capital 6,524,204 6,521,353
Deferred compensation (286,580) (458,340)
Deficit accumulated during the development stage (54,122,655) (43,508,291)
------------------- -----------------
Total stockholders' equity 9,406,338 17,177,518
------------------- -----------------
$ 12,227,593 $ 25,594,223
=================== =================

See accompanying notes.

F-3

TITAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS


PERIOD FROM
COMMENCEMENT
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, OF OPERATIONS
------------------------------------------------ (JULY 25, 1991) TO
1998 1997 1996 DECEMBER 31, 1998
-------------- -------------- -------------- -----------------

License and grant revenue $ - $ 17,499,948 $ 258,811 $ 17,898,281
Costs and expenses:
Research and development 7,813,363 9,309,923 5,566,772 44,703,679
Acquired in-process research and development - 9,500,000 - 10,186,000
General and administrative 3,707,874 6,513,603 5,263,964 22,049,823
-------------- -------------- -------------- ----------------
Total costs and expenses 11,521,237 25,323,526 10,830,736 76,939,502
-------------- -------------- -------------- ----------------
Income (loss) from operations (11,521,237) (7,823,578) (10,571,925) (59,041,221)

Other income (expense):
Equity in loss of Ansan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. - (590,853) (998,972) (2,046,939)
Gain on sale of technology - 8,361,220 - 8,361,220
Interest income 847,581 666,419 715,984 2,684,742
Interest expense (215) (226,685) (2,010,664) (4,389,902)
Gain (loss) on sale of fixed assets (13,016) 205,024 - 192,008
Other income or (expense) 72,523 - - 72,523
-------------- -------------- -------------- ----------------
Other income (expense) - net 906,873 8,415,125 (2,293,652) 4,873,652
-------------- -------------- -------------- ----------------
Income (loss) before minority interest (10,614,364) 591,547 (12,865,577) (54,167,569)
Minority interest in losses of subsidiaries - 64 9,931 44,914
-------------- -------------- -------------- ----------------
Net income (loss) (10,614,364) 591,611 (12,855,646) $ (54,122,655)
Deemed dividend upon conversion of preferred stock - - (5,431,871) (5,431,871)
-------------- -------------- -------------- ----------------

Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders $(10,614,364) $ 591,611 $(18,287,517) $ (59,554,526)
============== ============== ============== ================

Basic net income (loss) per common share $ (0.81) $ 0.05 $ (1.67)
============== ============== ==============

Shares used in computing basic net income (loss) per share 13,108,512 13,002,050 10,936,046
============== ============== ==============

Diluted net income (loss) per common share $ (0.81) $ 0.04 $ (1.67)
============== ============== ==============

Shares used in computing diluted net income (loss) per share 13,108,512 13,476,644 10,936,046
============== ============== ==============

See accompanying notes.

F-4

TITAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(NET CAPITAL DEFICIT)


DEFICIT TOTAL
PREFERRED COMMON ACCUMULATED STOCKHOLDERS'
STOCK STOCK ADDITIONAL DURING THE EQUITY
-------------------- ------------------------ PAID-IN DEFERRED DEVELOPMENT (NET CAPITAL
SHARES AMOUNT SHARES AMOUNT CAPITAL COMPENSATION STAGE DEFICIENCY)
-------- ---------- ----------- ----------- ---------- ---------- ------------- -----------

Net loss - Commencement of
operations (July 25,
1991) to December 31,
1992 - $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ (819,331) $ (819,331)
Issuance of shares of common
stock for cash to
founders and investors
in February 1993 for
$0.005 per share - - 998,367 5,853 - - - 5,853
Issuance of shares of common
stock for cash to an
employee in February
1993 for $0.003 per share - - 167,587 563 - - - 563
Issuance of shares of common
stock for cash to
investors in March 1993
for $0.297 per share,
net of issuance costs of
$1,503 - - 184,994 52,722 - - - 52,722
Grant of shares of common
stock to an employee in
June 1993 at $0.005 per
share - - 42,645 250 - - - 250
Issuance of shares of Series
A preferred stock for
cash to investors in
November 1993 for $5.868
per share, net of
issuance costs of
$2,759,851 3,278,069 16,457,649 - - - - - 16,457,649
Forgiveness of notes payable
to stockholder - - - - 40,000 - - 40,000
Net loss - Year ended
December 31, 1993 - - - - - - (5,757,296) (5,757,296)
--------- ---------- ----------- ----------- ---------- ---------- ------------- ----------
Balances at December 31, 1993 3,278,069 16,457,649 1,393,593 59,388 40,000 - (6,576,627) 9,980,410
Issuance of shares of common
stock for cash to a
consultant in April 1994
for $0.005 per share - - 14,926 88 - - - 88
Increase in paid-in capital
from issuance of common
stock by Ingenex, Inc. - - - - 128,805 - - 128,805
Net loss - Year ended
December 31, 1994 - - - - - - (12,974,175) (12,974,175)
--------- ---------- ----------- ----------- ---------- ---------- ------------- ----------
Balances at December 31, 1994 3,278,069 16,457,649 1,408,519 59,476 168,805 - (19,550,802) (2,864,872)

See accompanying notes.

F-5

TITAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(NET CAPITAL DEFICIT)


DEFICIT TOTAL
PREFERRED COMMON ACCUMULATED STOCKHOLDERS'
STOCK STOCK ADDITIONAL DURING THE EQUITY
--------------------- ------------------------ PAID-IN DEFERRED DEVELOPMENT (NET CAPITAL
SHARES AMOUNT SHARES AMOUNT CAPITAL COMPENSATION STAGE DEFICIENCY)
-------- ---------- ----------- ----------- ---------- ---------- ------------- ----------

Issuance of shares Series B
preferred stock for cash
to investors in February
1995 for $6.761 per
share, net of issuance
costs of $506,206 244,043 1,143,794 - - - - - 1,143,794
Increase in paid-in capital
from issuance of
warrants by Ingenex,
Inc. in connection with
bridge financing - - - - 600,000 - - 600,000
Increase in paid-in capital
from issuance of
warrants by Titan
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in
connection with bridge
financing - - - - 1,200,000 - - 1,200,000
Conversion of notes payable
to related parties and
accrued interest into
shares of Series A
preferred stock 256,130 1,306,329 - - - - - 1,306,329
Increase in paid-in capital
from issuance of common
stock by Ansan
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. - - - - 3,777,548 - - 3,777,548
Deferred compensation related
to grant of stock
options, net of
amortization - - - - 440,000 (418,000) 22,000
Issuance of shares of common
stock to acquire
minority interest of
Theracell - - 140,000 686,000 - - - 686,000
Net loss - Year ended
December 31, 1995 - - - - - - (11,693,454) (11,693,454)
--------- ---------- ----------- ----------- ---------- ---------- ------------- ----------
Balances at December 31, 1995 3,778,242 18,907,772 1,548,519 745,476 6,186,353 (418,000) (31,244,256) (5,822,655)

See accompanying notes.

F-6

TITAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(NET CAPITAL DEFICIT)


DEFICIT TOTAL
PREFERRED COMMON ACCUMULATED STOCKHOLDERS'
STOCK STOCK ADDITIONAL DURING THE EQUITY
--------------------- ------------------------ PAID-IN DEFERRED DEVELOPMENT (NET CAPITAL
SHARES AMOUNT SHARES AMOUNT CAPITAL COMPENSATION STAGE DEFICIENCY)
-------- ---------- ----------- ----------- ---------- ---------- ------------- ----------

Conversion of shares of
Series A & Series B
preferred stock to
Common stock in January
1966 (3,778,242) (18,907,772) 5,521,140 18,907,772 - - - -
Issuance of shares of common
stock for cash in
initial public offering
in January and February
1996, net of issuance
costs of $2,549,643 - - 3,680,000 15,850,357 - - - 15,850,357
Issuance of shares of common
stock for cash upon
exercise of stock option
grants at $0.30 to $1.35
per share in May through
June 1996. - - 16,520 10,664 - - - 10,664
Issuance of shares of common
stock for cash in
private placement in
July and August 1996,
net of issuance costs of
$2,260,372 - - 1,536,000 13,739,628 - - - 13,739,628
Deferred compensation related
to grant of stock
options in August 1996 - - - - 335,000 (335,000) - -
Issuance of shares of common
stock for cash upon
exercise of warrants at
$6.20 per share in
September through
December 1996 - - 59,014 365,887 - - - 365,887
Issuance of shares of common
stock upon cashless
exercise of warrants in
November and December
1996 - - 37,844 - - - - -
Amortization of deferred
compensation - - - - - 122,900 - 122,900
Net loss - Year ended
December 31, 1996 - - - - - - (12,855,646) (12,855,646)
---------- ---------- ----------- ----------- ---------- ---------- ------------- ----------
Balances at December 31, 1996 - - 12,399,037 49,619,784 6,521,353 (630,100) (44,099,902) 11,411,135

See accompanying notes.

F-7

TITAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(NET CAPITAL DEFICIT)


DEFICIT TOTAL
PREFERRED COMMON ACCUMULATED STOCKHOLDERS'
STOCK STOCK ADDITIONAL DURING THE EQUITY
--------------------- ------------------------ PAID-IN DEFERRED DEVELOPMENT (NET CAPITAL
SHARES AMOUNT SHARES AMOUNT CAPITAL COMPENSATION STAGE DEFICIENCY)
-------- ---------- ----------- ----------- ---------- ---------- ------------- ----------

Issuance of shares of common
stock in January 1997 in
partial consideration a
technology license - - 594,595 - - - - -
Issuance of shares of common
stock upon cashless
exercise of warrants in
February and December
1997 - - 53,765 - - - - -
Issuance of shares of common
stock for cash upon
exercise of stock option
grant at $0.59 per share
in February 1997 - - 5,117 3,012 - - - 3,012
Issuance of shares of Series
C preferred stock in
October 1997 in
connection with the
liquidation and merger
of Trilex 222,400 - - - - - - -
Issuance of shares of Series
D preferred stock in
November 1997 for cash 606,061 5,000,000 - - - - - 5,000,000
Amortization of deferred
compensation 171,760 171,760
Net income - Year ended
December 31, 1997 591,611 591,611
-------- ---------- ----------- ----------- ---------- ---------- ------------- ----------
Balances at December 31, 1997 828,461 5,000,000 13,052,514 49,622,796 6,521,353 (458,340) (43,508,291) 17,177,518

Issuance of shares of common
stock for cash upon
exercise of stock option
grants at $3.00 per
share in January through
June 1998 70,994 212,982 212,982
Release of guaranteed
security value in March
1998 2,455,591 2,455,591
Increase in paid-in capital
from issuance of common
stock by Theracell, Inc.
in February and March
1998 2,851 2,851
Amortization of deferred
compensation 171,760 171,760
Net loss - Year ended
December 31, 1998 (10,614,364) (10,614,364)
-------- ---------- ----------- ----------- ---------- ---------- ------------- ----------
Balances at December 31, 1998 $828,461 $5,000,000 $13,123,508 $52,291,369 $6,524,204 $(286,580) $(54,122,655) $9,406,338
======== ========== =========== =========== ========== ========== ============= ==========

See accompanying notes.

F-8

TITAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS


PERIOD FROM
COMMENCEMENT
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, OF OPERATIONS
---------------------------------------------- (JULY 25, 1991) TO
1998 1997 1996 DECEMBER 31, 1998
-------------- -------------- -------------- -----------------

Cash flows from operating activities
Net income (loss) $ (10,614,364) $ 591,611 $ (12,855,646) $ (54,122,655)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 293,610 385,503 496,466 1,742,304
Issuance of common stock to acquire in-process
technology - 5,500,000 - 5,500,000
Payment of guaranteed security value (3,044,409) - - (3,044,409)
Loss (gain) on sale of assets 13,016 (216,699) - (203,683)
Accretion of discount on indebtedness - 1,407,577 2,290,910
Equity in loss of Ansan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. - 590,854 998,972 2,046,940
Other - (9,931) (35,653)
Issuance of common stock to acquire
minority interest of Theracell, Inc. - - - 686,000
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Prepaid expenses and other current assets (81,021) 134,387 (153,253) (139,958)
Receivable - Ansan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. - 117,881 (60,090) -
Other assets 7,115 176,932 (74,486) (20,748)
Other receivables 371,793 (371,793) - -
Accounts payable (405,214) 212,467 (21,914) 734,425
Other accrued liabilities 309,764 (214,525) (556,878) 1,570,404
-------------- -------------- -------------- -----------------
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities (13,149,710) 6,906,618 (10,829,183) (42,996,123)
-------------- -------------- -------------- -----------------
Cash flows from investing activities
Purchase of furniture and equipment (322,890) (78,864) (270,036) (1,474,113)
Proceeds from sale of furniture and equipment 24,791 24,791
Purchases of short-term investments (100,000) (35,750,000) (59,782,493)
Proceeds from sales of short-term investments 500,000 12,600,000 22,750,000 59,782,493
Effect of deconsolidation of
Ansan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. - - (135,934)
-------------- -------------- -------------- -----------------
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities 201,901 12,421,136 (13,270,036) (1,585,256)
-------------- -------------- -------------- -----------------

See accompanying notes.

F-9

TITAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS


PERIOD FROM
COMMENCEMENT
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, OF OPERATIONS
---------------------------------------------- (JULY 25, 1991) TO
1998 1997 1996 DECEMBER 31, 1998
-------------- -------------- -------------- -----------------

Cash flows from financing activities
Issuance of common stock 212,982 3,012 29,966,536 30,241,756
Deferred offering costs - - 522,299 -
Deferred financing costs - 96,349 - (713,899)
Issuance of preferred stock - 5,000,000 - 22,601,443
Proceeds from notes and advances payable - - - 2,681,500
Repayment of notes payable - - - (1,441,500)
Proceeds from Ansan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
bridge financing - - - 1,425,000
Proceeds from Titan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and
Ingenex, Inc. bridge financing - - - 5,250,000
Repayment of Titan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and
Ingenex, Inc. bridge financing - - (5,250,000) (5,250,000)
Proceeds from capital lease bridge financing - - - 658,206
Payments of principal under capital lease obligation - (127,462) (226,713) (633,766)
Proceeds from Ingenex, Inc. technology financing - - - 2,000,000
Principal payments on Ingenex, Inc.
technology financing - (1,289,313) (494,107) (2,000,000)
Increase (decrease) in minority interest - - - 1,241,032
Issuance of common stock by subsidiaries 2,851 - 9,931 176,503
-------------- -------------- -------------- -----------------
Net cash provided by financing activities 215,833 3,682,586 24,527,946 56,236,275
-------------- -------------- -------------- -----------------
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents (12,731,976) 23,010,340 428,727 11,654,896
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 24,386,872 1,376,532 947,805 24,386,872
-------------- -------------- -------------- -----------------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 11,654,896 $ 24,386,872 $ 1,376,532 $ 36,041,768
============== ============== ============== =================
Supplemental cash flow disclosure
Interest paid $ 215 $ 226,685 $ 558,387 $ 1,393,524
============== ============== ============== =================
Conversion of notes payable to related parties and
accrued interest into Series A preferred stock $ - $ - $ - $ (1,306,329)
============== ============== ============== =================
Acquisition of furniture and equipment pursuant to
capital lease $ - $ - $ - $ 595,236
============== ============== ============== =================
Cashless exercise of warrants $ - $ 585,369 $ 286,523 $ 871,892
============== ============== ============== =================

See accompanying notes.

F-10





TITAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


1. ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

THE COMPANY AND ITS SEVERAL DEVELOPMENT STAGE SUBSIDIARIES

Titan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the "Company" or "Titan"), was incorporated
in February 1992 in the State of Delaware. Titan is a biopharmaceutical
company developing proprietary therapeutics for the treatment of central
nervous system disorders, cancer and other serious and life-threatening
diseases. Titan conducts a portion of its operations through three
subsidiaries: Ingenex, Inc. ("Ingenex"), Theracell, Inc. ("Theracell") and
ProNeura, Inc. ("ProNeura"), collectively, (the "Operating Companies").
Trilex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ("Trilex") was incorporated in May 1996, as a
wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, to engage in the development of
cancer therapeutic vaccines utilizing anti-idiotypic antibody technology. In
August 1997, Trilex was merged (the "Trilex Merger") with and into Titan. In
March 1999, Theracell was merged with and into Titan. (See Note 14 -
Subsequent Events.)

INGENEX, INC.

Ingenex is engaged in the development of gene-based therapeutics for the
treatment of cancer. In September 1994, Ingenex issued shares of its Series B
convertible preferred stock to a third party for $1,241,032, net of issuance
costs. In June 1997, Ingenex sold a research technology and certain fixed
assets for $8,722,500 in cash and the assumption of certain capital lease
liabilities and recognized a gain of $8,361,220. At December 31, 1998, the
Company owned 81% of Ingenex, assuming the conversion of all preferred stock
to common.

THERACELL, INC.

Theracell was incorporated in November 1992 to engage in the development
of novel treatments for various neurologic disorders through the
transplantation of neural cells and neuron-like cells directly into the
brain. At December 31, 1998, the Company owned 98% of Theracell. In March
1999, Theracell was merged with and into Titan. (See Note 14 Subsequent
Events.)

PRONEURA, INC.

ProNeura was incorporated in October 1995 to engage in the development
of cost effective, long-term treatment solutions to neurologic and
psychiatric disorders through an implantable drug delivery system. At
December 31, 1998, the Company owned 79% of ProNeura.

BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts
of Titan and the majority owned Operating Companies. All significant
intercompany transactions and accounts have been eliminated in consolidation.

The activities of the Company have primarily consisted of establishing
offices and research facilities, recruiting personnel, conducting research
and development, preclinical and clinical studies, performing business and
financial planning and raising capital. Accordingly, the Company is
considered to be in the development stage. The Company has incurred losses
since inception of $54,122,655 and expects to incur increasing losses and
require additional financial resources to achieve commercialization of its
products.

The Company anticipates working on a number of long-term development
projects which will involve experimental and unproven technologies. The
projects may require many years and substantial expenditures

F-11






TITAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


prior to commercialization. Therefore, the Company will need to obtain
additional funds from the issuance of equity or debt securities, from
corporate partners, or from other sources to continue its research and
development activities, fund operating expenses, pursue regulatory approvals
and build production, sales and marketing capabilities, as necessary.
Management believes that sufficient capital will be available to achieve
planned business objectives, including supporting certain preclinical
development and clinical testing, through at least 1999.

CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original
maturity of 90 days or less to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents include
$10,505,429 and $20,124,561 in money market funds at December 31, 1998 and
1997, respectively. The money market fund invests primarily in bank
certificates and corporate commercial paper and generally seeks to maintain a
constant $1.00 per share net asset value. The Company's investment policy is
to maintain liquidity and ensure safety of principal.

At December 31, 1997, short-term investments is comprised of auction
rate preferred stock (preferred stock investments in money market funds),
classified as "available for sale." Such investments are carried at cost,
which approximates their fair market value. The Company has not realized any
gains or losses on its investments.

FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT

Furniture and equipment is stated at cost and is depreciated using the
straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets ranging
from three to five years.

REVENUE RECOGNITION

Revenue consists of revenue from non-refundable up-front license fees,
which have been recognized in accordance with the related license agreement,
and government grants which support the Company's research effort in specific
research projects. These grants generally provide for reimbursement of
approved costs incurred as defined in the various agreements.

SPONSORED RESEARCH

Research and development expenses under sponsored research arrangements
are recognized as the related services are performed, generally ratably over
the period of service. Payments for license fees are expensed when paid.

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

In accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation" ("SFAS 123"),
the Company has elected to follow Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25,
"Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees" ("APB 25") and related
interpretations and to adopt the "disclosure only" alternative described in
SFAS 123 in accounting for its employee stock option plans. Under APB 25, if
the exercise price of the Company's employee stock options equals or exceeds
the fair value of the underlying stock on the date of grant, no compensation
expense is recognized.


F-12





TITAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings
per share:



1998 1997 1996
---------- ---------- ----------

Weighted-average shares of common stock
Outstanding during the period 13,108,512 13,002,050 10,936,046
Effect of dilutive securities:
Employee stock options --- 284,951 ---
Unit purchase options --- 20,615 ---
Convertible preferred stock --- 104,110 ---
Warrants --- 64,918 ---
---------- ---------- ----------
Potentially dilutive common shares --- 474,594 ---
Shares used in computation of diluted
earnings per share 13,108,512 13,476,644 10,936,046
---------- ---------- ----------
---------- ---------- ----------


Potentially dilutive securities not included in the computation of diluted
earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 1997:

Options to purchase 1,066,799 shares of common stock at various prices per
share were outstanding during 1997 but were not included in the computation
of diluted earnings per share because the exercise prices of the options were
greater than the average market price of the common shares and, therefore,
the effect would be antidilutive.

Options to purchase 307,200 Units (one share of common stock and one Class A
warrant) at $10.42 per unit were outstanding during 1997 but were not
included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the
exercise price of the units was greater than the average market price of the
common shares and, therefore, the effect would be antidilutive.

Warrants to purchase 7,031,986 shares of common stock at $6.20 per share were
outstanding during 1997 but were not included in the computation of diluted
earnings per share because the exercise price of the warrants was greater
than the average market price of the common shares and, therefore, the effect
would be antidilutive.

The Company issued 222,400 shares of a new class of preferred stock (the
"Series C Preferred") (see Note 7) in connection with the Trilex Merger. The
preferred stock will automatically convert to common stock, only if certain
development milestones are achieved, within certain timeframes. As the
milestones have not yet been met, the Series C Preferred is not included in
the computation of diluted earnings per share in 1997.

Had the Company been in a net income position, diluted earnings per
share in 1998 and 1996 would have included the shares used in the computation
of basic net loss per share for 1998 and for 1996 and the dilutive effect of
12,387,331 and 10,163,950 shares, respectively, related to outstanding
options and warrants (prior to the application of the treasury stock method.)

For purposes of computing per share data for the year ended December 31,
1996, the net loss has been increased by a $5,431,871 deemed dividend (see
Note 7).

USE OF ESTIMATES

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and
accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.


F-13





TITAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


2. FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT

Furniture and equipment consisted of the following at December 31:




1998 1997
------- ---------

Furniture and office equipment..................................... $ 233,433 $ 143,512
Laboratory equipment............................................... 250,459 107,104
Computer equipment................................................. 206,344 179,669
---------- ---------
690,236 430,285
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization (273,280) (176,562)
---------- ---------
Furniture and equipment, net....................................... $ 416,956 $ 253,723
---------- ---------
---------- ---------


Depreciation expense was $121,850, $213,743 and $327,309 for the years
ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively.

3. SPONSORED RESEARCH AND LICENSE AGREEMENTS

The Operating Companies have entered into various agreements with
research institutions, universities, and other entities for the performance
of research and development activities and for the acquisition of licenses
related to those activities. Expenses under these agreements totaled
$1,561,981, $2,104,105 and $1,827,000 in the years ended December 31, 1998,
1997 and 1996, respectively.

At December 31, 1998, the annual aggregate commitments the Company has
under these agreements, including minimum license payments, are as follows:




1999.............................................. $ 2,977,658
2000.............................................. 768,217
2001.............................................. 408,277
2002.............................................. 219,250
2003.............................................. 219,250
-----------
$ 4,592,652
-----------
-----------


After 2003, the Company must make annual payments aggregating $219,250
per year to maintain certain of the foregoing licenses. Certain of the
licenses provide for the payment of royalties by the Company on future
product sales, if any. In addition, in order to maintain license and other
rights during product development, the Company must comply with various
conditions including the payment of patent related costs and obtaining
additional equity investments.

4. LEASES

The Company leases facilities under operating leases that expire at
various dates through August 2002. Rent expense was $328,065, $397,133 and
$461,815 for years ended December 31, 1998, 1997, and 1996, respectively.

The following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments at December
31, 1998:



OPERATING
LEASES
-----------

1999....................................................... $342,183
2000....................................................... 380,815
2001....................................................... 415,320
2002....................................................... 240,526
-----------
Total minimum payments required............................ $ 1,378,844
-----------
-----------


5. BANK LINE OF CREDIT

The Company has available a bank line of credit that expires in June
2000, under which $5,000,000 is available. The agreement contains covenants
that require the Company to maintain certain financial ratios. At

F-14



TITAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


December 31, 1998, the Company had no outstanding balance under this line of
credit and was in compliance with the required covenants.

6. LOAN GUARANTEE

In November 1998, the Company agreed to guarantee certain debt
obligations of the Company's Chief Executive Officer. Under said guarantee,
the Company may be obligated to make a payment of up to $400,000. The
Company's Chief Executive Officer has pledged approximately 300,000 shares of
the Company's common stock, owned by the Chief Executive Officer, to secure
the debt.

7. STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

PREFERRED STOCK

In August 1997, Trilex was merged by and into Titan. In connection with
this transaction, in October 1997, the Company issued 222,400 shares of
Series C preferred stock to certain members of Trilex management and certain
consultants of Trilex. The Series C preferred stock will automatically
convert to common stock, on a one-to-one basis, only if certain development
milestones are achieved, within certain timeframes. Holders of Series C
preferred stock are entitled to receive dividends, when, as and if declared
by the board of directors ratably with any declaration or payment of any
dividend on the common stock or other junior securities of the Company. The
series C preferred stock has a liquidation preference equal to $0.01 per
share. No value was assigned to the Series C preferred stock in the
accompanying financial statements.

In November 1997, Titan issued to Novartis Pharma AG ("Novartis")
606,061 shares of Series D convertible preferred stock (the "Series D
Shares"), pursuant to an agreement by which Titan granted certain technology
rights to Novartis. The Series D Shares were issued pursuant to a stock
purchase agreement which provides for conversion of such shares into the
Company's common stock at the option of Novartis at any time after January
29, 1999. The conversion price will be equal to the market price during a
period to be specified within the first two fiscal quarters of 1999 and is
subject to a floor of $7.50 and a ceiling of $9.00. Accordingly, upon
conversion of the Series D Shares, the Company will issue a minimum of
555,555 and a maximum of 666,666 shares of common stock. The stock purchase
agreement provides that such shares may not be sold, transferred or assigned
prior to November 19, 1999. Holders of Series D preferred stock are entitled
to receive dividends, when, as and if declared by the board of directors
ratably with any declaration or payment of any dividend on the common stock
or other junior securities of the Company. The Series D preferred stock has a
liquidation preference equal to $0.05 per share. Holders of Series D
preferred stock are entitled to vote on a one-to-one basis with the common
stock of the Company.

Each share of Series A and Series B preferred stock outstanding prior to
the Company's IPO was originally convertible into (and carried voting rights
equal to) one share of common stock. In October 1995, pursuant to the terms
of the Series B preferred stock agreement and in contemplation of the IPO,
the board of directors and stockholders approved a change in the conversion
ratio of Series A and Series B preferred stock providing that in the event of
an IPO of common stock on or before March 31, 1996, each share of Series A
and Series B preferred stock would automatically be converted into
1.4310444107 and 1.8993878755 shares of common stock, respectively (the "IPO
Conversion Ratio"). The IPO Conversion Ratio was not higher than the ratio
which otherwise would have applied in an IPO during this period. In
conjunction with the IPO in January 1996 all outstanding shares of Series A
and Series B preferred stock were converted into 5,521,140 shares of common
stock.

The holders of the Series A and Series B preferred stock received common
stock in January 1996 with an aggregate fair value (at the $5 per unit value
of the IPO) which exceeded by approximately $5,400,000 the cost of their
initial investment in the Series A and Series B preferred stock. This amount
has been deemed to be the equivalent of a preferred stock dividend. The
Company recorded the deemed dividend at the time of conversion by offsetting
charges and credits to additional paid in capital, without any effect on
total stockholders' equity (net capital deficiency). There was no effect on
1995 or 1996 net loss or pro forma net


F-15



TITAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


loss per share from the mandatory conversion. However, the amount increased
the loss allocable to common stock, in the calculation of net loss per share
in 1996.

COMMON STOCK

In January 1996, the Company issued 3,200,000 units at $5.00 per unit in
its IPO. Each unit consisted of one share of common stock and one redeemable
Class A warrant. The net proceeds (after underwriter's discount and expenses,
and other costs associated with the IPO) totaled $13,690,357. At the closing
of the offering, all of the Company's then outstanding Series A and Series B
preferred stock automatically converted into common stock. In February 1996,
the Company issued an additional 480,000 units, at $5.00 per unit, in
accordance with the underwriter's over-allotment option. The net proceeds of
the underwriter's over-allotment option totaled $2,160,000.

In July and August 1996, the Company completed a private placement (the
"Private Placement") of 1,536,000 units, each unit consisting of one share of
common stock and one redeemable Class A warrant, for total gross proceeds of
$16,000,000. After deducting placement agent fees and other expenses of the
private placement, the net proceeds to the Company were $13,739,628.

WARRANTS

At December 31, 1998, the Company had a total of 7,451,745 warrants
outstanding to purchase common stock, at a weighted average exercise price of
$6.09. Such warrants expire from January 1999 to January 2001. The warrants
include 7,031,986 Class A warrants issued during 1996 in connection with the
IPO, repayment of a bridge financing and the Private Placement. They entitle
the holder to purchase one share of common stock at an exercise price of
$6.20, subject to adjustment in certain circumstances, at any time for a
period of five years. The warrants are subject to redemption by the Company
at $0.05 per warrant on 30 days' prior written notice if the closing bid
price of the Company's common stock averages in excess of $9.10 per share for
30 consecutive trading days ending within 15 days of the date of notice of
redemption.

UNIT PURCHASE OPTIONS

In connection with the IPO, the underwriter was granted an option ("Unit
Purchase Option") to acquire 320,000 additional units at a price of $6.20 per
unit, and in connection with the Private Placement, the placement agent was
granted a Unit Purchase Option to purchase an additional 307,200 units at a
price of $10.42 per unit. Each unit consists of one share of common stock and
one Class A warrant.

SHARES RESERVED FOR FUTURE ISSUANCE

As of December 31, 1998, shares of common stock reserved by the Company
for future issuance consisted of the following:



Warrants issued in connection with related party debt............. 33,682
Ingenex Technology Financing warrants............................. 119,770
Class A warrants.................................................. 7,031,986
Placement agent warrants.......................................... 266,307
Unit purchase options (including underlying Class A warrants).... 1,254,400
Stock options..................................................... 2,792,120
Preferred stock................................................... 889,066
----------
Total............................................................. 12,387,331
----------
----------



F-16



TITAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


8. STOCK OPTION PLANS

Under the terms of the Company's amended and restated stock option plan
(the "1993 Option Plan"), incentive stock options may be granted to
employees, and nonstatutory stock options may be granted to employees,
directors and consultants of the Company and Operating Companies. A total of
558,073 shares of common stock have been reserved and authorized for issuance
under the 1993 Option Plan.

Options granted under the 1993 Option Plan expire no later than ten
years from the date of grant, except when the grantee is a 10% shareholder of
the Company or an Operating Company, in which case the maximum term is five
years from the date of grant. The exercise price of incentive stock options,
nonstatutory stock options and options granted to 10% shareholders of the
Company (or the Operating Companies), shall be at least 100%, 85% and 110%,
respectively, of the fair market value of the stock subject to the option on
the grant date. The options are exercisable immediately upon grant, however,
the shares issuable upon exercise of the options are subject to repurchase by
the Company. Such repurchase rights will lapse over a period of up to five
years from the date of grant. At December 31, 1998, 65,481 shares of common
stock underlying the options would be subject to repurchase by the Company
should such options be exercised and the optionees' employment or consulting
relationship terminate. No further options will be granted under the 1993
Option Plan.

In November 1995, the Company adopted the 1995 Stock Option Plan (the
"1995 Option Plan"). A total of 1,300,000 shares of common stock are reserved
and authorized for issuance under the 1995 Option Plan. Options granted under
the 1995 Option Plan expire no later than ten years from the date of grant,
except when the grantee is a 10% shareholder of the Company or an Operating
Company, in which case the maximum term is five years from the date of grant.
The exercise price of incentive stock options, nonstatutory stock options and
options granted to 10% shareholders of the Company (or the Operating
Companies), shall be at least 100%, 85% and 110%, respectively, of the fair
market value of the stock subject to the option on the grant date. The
provisions of the 1995 Option Plan provide for the automatic grant of
nonqualified stock options to purchase shares of common stock to directors of
the Company who are not principal (10%) stockholders of the Company
("Eligible Directors"). Each Eligible Director of the Company was granted an
option to purchase 10,000 shares of common stock upon the effective date of
the IPO. Future Eligible Directors will be granted a Director Option to
purchase 10,000 shares of common stock on the date that such person is first
elected or appointed a director. Each Eligible Director will receive an
automatic grant of a Director Option to purchase 2,000 shares of common stock
on the day immediately following the date of each annual meeting of
stockholders, as long as such director is a member of the Board of Directors.

In June 1998, the Company adopted the 1998 Stock Option Plan (the "1998
Option Plan"). A total of 1,000,000 shares of common stock are reserved and
authorized for issuance under the 1998 Option Plan. Options granted under the
1998 Option Plan expire no later than ten years from the date of grant,
except when the grantee is a 10% shareholder of the Company or an Operating
Company, in which case the maximum term is five years from the date of grant.
The exercise price of incentive stock options and options granted to 10%
shareholders of the Company (or the Operating Companies), shall be at least
100% and 110%, respectively, of the fair market value of the stock subject to
the option on the grant date. The provisions of the 1998 Option Plan provide
for the automatic grant of nonqualified stock options to purchase shares of
common stock to directors of the Company who are not principal (10%)
stockholders of the Company ("Eligible Directors"). Future Eligible Directors
will be granted a Director Option to purchase 10,000 shares of common stock
on the date that such person is first elected or appointed a director. Each
Eligible Director will receive an automatic grant of a Director Option to
purchase 3,000 shares of common stock on the day immediately following the
date of each annual meeting of stockholders, as long as such director is a
member of the Board of Directors. At the time that there are no options
available under the 1995 Plan, the automatic grant shall increase to 5,000
shares of common stock, inclusive of any portion of an automatic grant of a
Director Option received by an Eligible Director under the 1995 plan for such
year.

F-17



TITAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


In June 1998, the Company adopted an Option Exchange Program whereby
certain employee options which were previously granted at exercise prices
greater than $10.75 per share were exchanged for new options with an exercise
price of $7.50 per share. Notwithstanding the original vesting schedule, all
exchanged options vested as of the exchange date are vested under the new
option grants and the unvested portion will vest ratably over 24 months and
have a term of approximately eight years. A total of 820,135 options with a
weighted-average exercise price of $10.91 were exchanged and are reflected
as cancellations and grants in the following table.

Activity under the 1993, 1995, and 1998 Option Plans is summarized below:



OUTSTANDING OPTIONS
SHARES -------------------
AVAILABLE NUMBER OF PRICE PER WEIGHTED AVG.
FOR GRANT SHARES SHARE EXERCISE PRICE
---------- ---------- ------------- --------------

Balance at December 31, 1995 207,996 350,077 $0.29 - $1.35 $1.04
Increase in shares reserved 1,080,118 -- -- --
Options granted (1,080,635) 1,080,635 $5.00 - $11.75 $9.93
Options exercised -- (16,520) $0.29 - $1.35 $0.62
Options canceled 11,886 (11,886) $0.59 - $1.35 $0.66
---------- ----------
Balance at December 31, 1996 219,365 1,402,306 $0.59 - $11.75 $7.90
Increase from Substitute Options 452,475 -- -- --
Options granted (588,100) 588,100 $2.88 - $9.13 $3.46
Options exercised -- (5,117) $0.59 $0.59
Options canceled 168,256 (168,256) $0.59 - $11.63 $3.99
Plan shares expired (128,693) -- -- --
---------- ----------
Balance at December 31, 1997 123,303 1,817,033 $0.59 - $11.75 $6.88
Increase in shares reserved 1,000,000 -- -- --
Options granted (1,102,135) 1,102,135 $2.47 - $7.50 $6.82
Options exercised -- (70,994) $3.00 $3.00
Options cancelled 923,919 (923,919) $0.59 - $11.75 $10.10
Plan Shares expired (77,222) -- -- --
---------- ----------
Balance at December 31, 1998 867,865 1,924,255 $0.59 - $11.75 $5.45
---------- ----------
---------- ----------


The increase in the shares reserved during 1997 was due to options
issued in conjunction with the liquidation of Trilex. The 1995 Option Plan
allows that stock options issued as the result of a merger or consolidation
("Substitute Options") will be added to the maximum number of shares provided
for in the plan. Consequently, Substitute Options are not returned to the
shares reserved under the plan when cancelled. During 1998 and 1997, 72,296
and 123,576 Substitute Options, respectively, were cancelled and are included
as shares expired during the year. The increase in the shares reserved during
1998 was due to the adoption of the 1998 Option Plan.

Of the options on 1,817,033 shares outstanding at December 31, 1997,
options on 713,545 shares were exercisable at that date. The options
outstanding at December 31, 1998 have been segregated into three ranges for
additional disclosure as follows:

F-18



TITAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS




OPTIONS OUTSTANDING OPTIONS EXERCISABLE
--------------------------------- ----------------------------
RANGE OF WEIGHTED AVG. WEIGHTED AVG. OPTIONS WEIGHTED AVG.
EXERCISE OPTIONS REMAINING EXERCISE CURRENTLY EXERCISE
PRICES OUTSTANDING CONTRACTUAL LIFE PRICE EXERCISABLE PRICE
-------- ----------- ---------------- ------------- ----------- -------------

$ 0.59 - $ 5.00 665,620 7.50 $ 2.47 396,375 $ 2.06
$ 5.30 - $ 7.13 426,000 8.48 $ 6.06 287,205 $ 6.01
$ 7.50 - $ 9.13 832,635 9.44 $ 7.52 483,685 $ 7.53
--------- ---------
1,924,255 8.55 $ 5.45 1,167,265 $ 5.30
--------- ---------
--------- ---------



In addition, the Operating Companies, with the exception of ProNeura,
each have a stock option plan under which options to purchase common stock of
the Operating Companies have been and may be granted.

STOCK COMPENSATION

The Company has elected to follow APB 25 and related interpretations in
accounting for its stock options because, as discussed below, the alternative
fair value accounting provided for under SFAS 123 requires use of option
valuation models that were not developed for use in valuing employee stock
options. Under APB 25, because the exercise price of the Company's employee
stock options equals the market price of the underlying stock on the date of
the grant, no compensation expense is recognized.

Pro forma information regarding the net income and earnings per share is
required by SFAS 123, and has been determined as if the Company had accounted
for its employee stock options granted subsequent to 1994 under the fair
value method of that Statement. The fair value for these options was
estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model for
the multiple option approach with the following assumptions for 1998, 1997
and 1996: weighted-average volatility factor of 0.7, 0.7, and 0.6,
respectively; no expected dividend payments; weighted-average risk-free
interest rates in effect of 5.5, 5.5, and 6.38, respectively; and a
weighted-average expected life of 2.86, 3.79, and 4.77, respectively.

The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in
estimating the fair value of traded options which have no vesting
restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models
require the input of highly subjective assumptions including the expected
stock price volatility. Because the Company's employee stock options have
characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, and
because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the
fair value estimate, in management's opinion, the existing models do not
necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of the
Company's employee stock options.

Based upon the above methodology, the weighted-average fair value of
options granted during the years ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996 was
$1.87, $1.90, and $5.71, respectively.

For purposes of pro forma disclosures, the estimated fair value of the
options is amortized to pro forma net loss over the options' vesting period.
The Company's pro forma information is as follows:




DECEMBER 31,
------------
1998 1997 1996
---- ---- ----

Pro forma net loss
attributable to common stockholders.................... $ (11,354,801) $ (2,065,259) $ (20,233,716)
Consolidated pro forma
net loss per share.................................. $ (0.87) $ (0.16) $ (1.85)


F-19



TITAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


The consolidated pro forma net loss calculated above includes the estimated
fair value of the options granted by each of the operating companies in 1998,
1997 and 1996, calculated on substantially equivalent assumptions.


9. EQUITY IN LOSS OF ANSAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

Ansan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. was a majority-owned consolidated subsidiary
until its public offering in August 1995, at which it became an equity method
investee of the Company.

In November 1997, the shareholders of Ansan approved an Agreement and
Plan of Reorganization and Merger between Ansan and Discovery Laboratories,
Inc., a development state biotechnology company, pursuant to which Discovery
was merged with and into Ansan.

Pursuant to the merger, the Company acquired an exclusive worldwide
license to Ansan's butyrate compounds for anti-cancer and certain other
indications in exchange for the Company's payment of a 2% royalty on net
sales and the Company's transfer to Ansan of all of its equity holdings in
Ansan. Upon completion of the merger, Ansan repaid approximately $1,170,000
of outstanding indebtedness to the Company.

Operating results and accumulated deficit:



As a consolidated
subsidiary of As an equity
the Company investee of the Company
------------------ --------------------------------
Seven months August 1995 Nine months
ended through Year ended ended
July 31, 1995 December 1995 December 1996 September 1997
------------------ ------------- ------------- --------------

Net loss (1,777,561) (1,043,845) (2,280,757) (1,469,652)
Company's share of net loss:
As consolidated subsidiary................. (1,777,561)
-------------
-------------
As equity investee (approximately 44%
at December 31, 1995 and 43%
at December 1996 and September 1997)..... $ (457,114) $ (998,972) $ (590,854)
----------- ------------ -----------
----------- ------------ -----------


The Company's share of net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 1997
represents the entire carrying value of the investment at December 31, 1996
as the allocable portion of Ansan's loss exceeded the book value of the
investment.

10. ILOPERIDONE SUBLICENSE

In November 1997, Titan and Novartis Pharma AG entered into an
agreement pursuant to which the Company granted Novartis a sublicense for the
worldwide (with the exception of Japan) development, manufacturing and
marketing of Iloperidone. Pursuant to the sublicense, Novartis paid to the
Company $20 million consisting of an up-front license fee of $15 million and
$5 million for the purchase of 606,061 shares of Series D convertible
preferred stock. In addition, approximately $2.4 million in cash was paid by
Novartis as reimbursement of research and development costs incurred by the
Company. The sublicense provided for future payments by Novartis contingent
upon the achievement of regulatory milestones as well as a royalty on net
sales, if any, of the product. Novartis has assumed the clinical development,
registration and marketing costs of Iloperidone.

11. MINORITY INTEREST

The $1,241,032 received by Ingenex upon the issuance of Series B
convertible preferred stock was classified as minority interest in the
consolidated balance sheet. As a result of the Series B preferred
stockholders' liquidation preference, the balance has not been reduced by any
portion of the losses of Ingenex.

Amounts invested by outside investors in the common stock of the
consolidated subsidiaries has been apportioned between minority interest and
additional paid-in capital in the consolidated balance sheets. Losses
applicable to the minority interest holdings of the Operating Companies'
common stock have been reduced to zero.

12. GUARANTEED SECURITY VALUE

In January 1997, the Company entered into an exclusive license agreement
with Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc. ("Hoechst"). The license agreement gave the
Company a worldwide license to Hoechst's patent rights and know-how related to
the antipsychotic agent Iloperidone, including the ability to develop, use,
sublicense, manufacture and sell products and processes claimed in the patent
rights. Pursuant to the license, the Company paid, during 1997, an up-front
license fee of $9,500,000, consisting of: (i) $4,000,000 in cash and (ii)
$5,500,000 through the issuance of 594,595 shares of common stock (the
"Hoechst Shares".) The Company was obligated to pay to Hoechst the difference
between $5,500,000 and the net proceeds received by Hoechst upon sale of the
Hoechst Shares. Accordingly, the Company classified the entire $5,500,000 as
a non-current liability under the heading Guaranteed Security Value in the
accompanying balance sheet. In February 1998, Hoechst sold the Hoechst Shares
for net proceeds of approximately $2,456,000. In March 1998, the Company paid
to Hoechst approximately $3,044,000, which was deducted from the Guaranteed
Security Value balance. The remaining balance of $2,456,000 was transferred
to stockholders' equity. The Company is required to make additional benchmark
payments as specific milestones are met. Upon commercialization of the
product, the license agreement provides that the Company will pay royalties
based on net sales.

13. INCOME TAXES

As of December 31, 1998, the Company had federal net operating loss
carryforwards of approximately $40,100,000. The Company also had federal
research and development tax credit carryforwards of approximately
$1,300,000. The net operating loss and credit carryforwards will expire at
various dates beginning in 2008 through 2018, if not utilized.

Utilization of the net operating losses may be subject to a substantial
annual limitation due to the ownership change limitations provided by the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986. The annual limitation may result in the
expiration of net operating losses before utilization.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities reflect the net tax effects of net
operating losses and of temporary differences between the carrying amount of
assets and liabilities for financial reporting and the amounts used for
income tax purposes. Significant components of the Company's deferred tax
assets for federal and state income taxes are as follows:


F-20



TITAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


Deferred tax assets:



DECEMBER 31,
---- ----
1998 1997
---- ----

Net operating loss carryforwards $ 14,500,000 $ 11,500,000
Research credit carryforwards 1,400,000 1,200,000
Capitalized research and
development 1,500,000 1,200,000
Other - net 1,400,000 600,000
------------ ------------
Net deferred tax assets 18,800,000 14,500,000
Valuation allowance (18,800,000) (14,500,000)
------------ ------------
Net deferred tax assets $ $
------------ ------------
------------ ------------


The net valuation allowance increased by $100,000 during the year ended
December 31, 1997. The net valuation allowance increased by approximately
$4,000,000 during the year ended December 31, 1996.

14. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

PRIVATE PLACEMENT

In January 1999, the Company completed a private placement of 2,254,545
shares of its Common Stock for net proceeds of approximately $5,790,000,
after deducting fees and commissions and other expenses of the offering. As a
result of the offering, the exercise price of the Company's Class A warrants
have been adjusted from $6.20 to $6.02.

THERACELL MERGER (unaudited)

In March 1999, Theracell was merged with and into Titan. Pursuant to the
merger, the Company will issue approximately 33,000 shares of its common
stock to the minority shareholders of Theracell. The Company will record an
in-process research and development expense of approximately $140,000, equal
to the value of the common stock issued.

F-21



SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

TITAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

Date: March 31, 1999 By: /s/ Louis R. Bucalo
-------------------------------------
Louis R. Bucalo, M.D.,
President and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
this report has been signed below by the following persons in the capacities and
on the dates stated.



Signature Title Date
--------- ----- ----

/s/ Louis R. Bucalo President, Chief Executive Officer and March 31, 1999
- ----------------------- Director (principal executive officer)
Louis R. Bucalo, M.D.


/s/ Ernst Gunter-Afting Director March 31, 1999
- -----------------------
Ernst Gunter-Afting


/s/ Victor J. Bauer Director March 31, 1999
- -----------------------
Victor J. Bauer, Ph.D.


/s/ Eurelio M. Cavalier Director March 31, 1999
- -----------------------
Eurelio M. Cavalier


Director
- -----------------------
Michael K. Hsu


/s/ Hubert E. Huckel Director March 31, 1999
- -----------------------
Hubert E. Huckel, M.D.


/s/ Marvin E. Jaffe Director March 31, 1999
- -----------------------
Marvin E. Jaffe, M.D.


/s/ Konrad M. Weis Director March 31, 1999
- -----------------------
Konrad M. Weis, Ph.D.


/s/ Kenneth J. Widder Director March 31, 1999
- -----------------------
Kenneth J. Widder, M.D.


/s/ Robert E. Farrell Executive Vice President and Chief March 31, 1999
- ----------------------- Financial Officer (principal financial
Robert E. Farrell and accounting officer)