SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
ý |
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 |
|
OR |
|
o |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to |
Commission file number 000-29335
WITNESS SYSTEMS, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Delaware (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) |
23-2518693 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
300 Colonial Center Parkway Roswell, Georgia (Address of Principal Executive Offices) |
30076 (Zip Code) |
Registrant's telephone number, including area code 770-754-1900
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Title of each class |
Name of each exchange on which registered |
|
Common Stock, par value $.01 per share | NASDAQ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). Yes ý No o
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2004 was $275.0 million. The number of shares of the registrant's common stock outstanding on March 4, 2005 was 26,816,919.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrant's definitive proxy statement for its annual meeting of stockholders, currently scheduled for May 18, 2005, are incorporated by reference in Part III of this report.
This annual report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements that are not historical facts but rather are based on current expectations, estimates and projections about our business and industry, our beliefs and assumptions. Words such as "anticipates", "expects"", "intends"", "plans"", "believes", "seeks", "estimates" and variations of these words and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, some of which are beyond our control, are difficult to predict and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or forecasted in the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements that were true at the time made may ultimately prove to be incorrect or false. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which reflect our management's view only as of the date of this report. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
The Business section should be read in conjunction with Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto included elsewhere in this report. Investors should carefully review the information under the caption "Factors That May Affect Our Future Results and Market Price of Our Stock" beginning on page 30.
Overview
We provide an integrated performance optimization software suite that enables global enterprises to capture customer intelligence and optimize workforce performance. Our solution is comprised of Voice over Internet Protocol ("VoIP") telephony, compliance, high-volume and business-driven recording solutions, as well as performance analysis and e-learning applications. Our eQuality® software suite delivers an integrated system for continuous performance improvement in multimedia customer interaction centers, Internet Protocol ("IP") telephony and back office environments to enhance the customer experience. These applications are designed to enhance the quality of customer interactions across multiple communications media, including the telephone, e-mail and the Internet, and are used primarily in the organization's contact center(s). Our enterprise collaboration architecture allows contact center management to share information gathered in the contact center with other departments that service the customer, as well as throughout the organization. The result is a proactive management tool for optimizing customer relationship management ("CRM"), improving communication among departments, and fine-tuning workflow, processes and quality of service from within the contact center and throughout the enterprise. As a result, we believe our customers are able to generate additional revenue opportunities, improve profitability, enhance customer retention, reduce employee turnover and improve their overall customer service.
Our eQuality software suite is designed to enable customer contact centers within a company to capture, evaluate and analyze complete customer interactions through multiple media, identify performance gaps and then apply targeted electronic learning for continuous performance improvement. The eQuality software records a customer sales/service representative's ("CSR"s) voice interactions with a customer as well as the CSR's corresponding computer desktop activities, such as data entry, screen navigation and data retrieval. By capturing both voice and computer desktop activity and synchronizing them during replay, a company can observe and analyze complete customer interactions as they actually occurred. Supporting the need for Web-based customer interactions, the eQuality software suite also enables companies to capture, evaluate and analyze e-mail, Web interactions and guided browser sessions. In addition, the eQuality software suite allows companies to selectively capture, evaluate and analyze customer interactions on any of these mediums based on
1
business criteria that they define, such as key customers, important marketing campaigns and new product introductions.
We sell our software solutions through a combination of our direct sales force and an indirect sales channel consisting of systems integrators, distributors, resellers and Original Equipment Manufacturers ("OEM"). We provide our solutions to an extensive base of large companies with multiple contact centers including Accor, Alliant Energy, American Airlines, Ameritrade, AT&T, Bristol Myers Squibb, British Telecom, Cable & Wireless, Canon Oceania, Centrica, Compaq Computer, Continental Airlines, Federal Express, GlaxoSmithKline, The Hartford Financial Services Group, Hertz, HSBC, Lloyds TSB, Medco Health Solutions, Inc., Mercedes Benz, Nokia, PacifiCorp, Pitney Bowes, Royal & Sun Alliance, Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Target, Telstra, Verizon, Visa, Volkswagen, Wells Fargo Bank and Xerox. Our indirect sales channel is strategically focused on small to medium-sized businesses ("SMBs"), generally with single-site contact centers. Transactions with SMBs tend to be small in size and generate less revenue to us on an individual basis; therefore, it is more cost effective for our indirect sales channel to execute these orders.
Industry Background
Developing and maintaining long-term customer relationships is critical to the success of a business operating in the competitive global marketplace. Because the Internet enables consumers to easily evaluate products and prices from a wide range of geographically dispersed vendors and quickly change vendors at relatively low cost, it is difficult for businesses to retain long-term relationships with their customers. Personal contact is essential to enabling a high quality customer experience. The integration and optimization of customer contacts across all channels of communication has become both a strategic and tactical business requirement. In response to these circumstances, companies adopt CRM initiatives to increase the longevity and profitability of their customer relationships, and continue to develop CRM software applications to automate and evaluate key sales, marketing and customer service processes and improve the effectiveness of their customer interactions. According to IT industry analysts at Gartner, Inc., "Organizations are moving to customer-centric models where efficiency is not as important as effectiveness. They demand accuracy and speed."
The focus of CRM applications is to improve companies' internal sales, marketing and customer service processes and, resulting response to the competitive pressures generated from the Internet and e-commerce, to improve their ability to identify and address their customers' needs. Companies recognize that improving customer satisfaction and enhancing employee skills is an integral part of their goals to foster customer relationships and increase customer intimacy. We believe that companies, with a better understanding of the characteristics and preferences of their customers, will be able to customize their product and service offerings more effectively, which can result in increased customer retention. In addition, these companies will be able to better identify opportunities to sell complementary or higher-end products and to more accurately forecast customer demand.
To understand and improve customer relationships, a company must first improve its specific business processes that involve direct customer interaction. Frequently, a company's direct customer interactions occur through contact centers. These contact centers traditionally are staffed by CSRs, who process a steady flow of outbound or inbound telephone calls relating to the company's products and services. The technical infrastructure of a contact center typically consists of supervisor and agent workstations linked to a central telephone switch and a common computer system.
Contact centers are multi-functional, multi-channel customer interaction centers. Multi-channel customer contact centers conduct outbound calls for functions such as collections and product sales, or manage inbound calls, for purposes such as product support, order processing or customer service. They also handle multiple tasks effectively that involve interaction across a growing number of customer touch-points, including telephone, e-mail and the Web. According to Gartner, Inc., the
2
average cost of a Web-based self-service inquiry is a fraction of the cost of a call handled by a call center employee, illustrating why companies consider the deployment of Web-based self-service options a priority in their future customer care plans.
Customer service is no longer a separate and distinct business function but an integrated set of business processes. Many organizations today have business plans that include creating a positive, consistent customer experience across channels and functions. Providing quality customer experiences remains an important goal for most organizations today. This focus is extending to many areas of the business as they embrace the technology to help identify the root cause of customer frustration.
Companies have increased their focus on developing and improving the efficiency of their contact center operations. The current business environment is focused on performance improvement, particularly optimum customer service levels. Companies want to improve productivity and data quality, as well as audit capabilities needed to ensure adherence to processes, such as regulatory compliance and fraud reduction. By focusing on performance optimization, companies can better identify barriers and breakdowns, such as where and why errors occur, so they can make adjustments, often before errors affect customers. Our software enables these companies to help improve the quality and productivity of back office functions, such as customer administration and billing, while concentrating on providing high quality customer service. Using business rules, companies can automatically capture transactions placed into unique contact folders for specific business functions, and be notified when the specific business condition exists. Organizations can evaluate operational effectiveness, spot trends and implement tactics to improve performance. Desktop recording captures the screen navigation and exact keystrokes on employee desktops, so users can replay and evaluate transactions just as they occurred. Advanced recording capabilities enable users to define and maintain individual screen-based triggers, so they can capture specific business functions based on the values of individual fields within an application. Recording and reviewing transactions can provide valuable insight into the effectiveness of particular areas of the organization and its impact on the customer experience. By capturing sample transactions, companies can assess the ease with which staff completes processes and the effectiveness of systems. According to Datamonitor plc, quality monitoring (also known as quality management) is projected to grow on an average basis of 12 percent annually from 2003 to 2008.
Certain companies might need to record 100% of all transactions for fraud detection or regulatory compliance. For example, companies may record all orders processed beyond a certain transaction amount or capture 100% of high-risk situations for audit purposes. According to DMG Consulting LLC, compliance recording (also known as logging) is projected to grow from 10 to 15 percent annually over the next few years.
The convergence of voice and data communications technologies is changing the landscape of today's telecommunications infrastructure. VoIP is enabling smaller organizations to access application functionality previously afforded only by large organizations and is giving larger customers greater flexibility in their infrastructure, resulting in improved operational efficiency and significant cost savings. IP telephony is enabling the development of enterprise-wide contact management systems, which integrate the vast amounts of information from customers, suppliers or other third parties at every touch point or department primarily, but not exclusively, for the contact center. Interactions with customers and suppliers can include enormous amounts of valuable information that, if made available to the right people within an organization, may dramatically improve the service offered to customers. The information contained in telephone calls had previously been difficult to disseminate once captured.
Our VoIP product consists of a recording subsystem that works with a variety of IP telephony contact center products that converts phone calls sent over those systems into stored audio files. These files can then be stored, archived, replayed and analyzed with our other eQuality products. Our technology is also capable of capturing other information related to a VoIP call, such as the time of the
3
call, dialed digits and date of the call for the purpose of providing the user with a simple method of cataloging and searching for VoIP recorded calls. VoIP call recording shipments are projected to grow on an average basis of 39 percent annually from 2003 to 2008, according to Tern Systems, Inc.
The eQuality Solution
We provide business-driven multi-media recording, performance analysis and e-learning applications that are designed to enhance the quality of customer interactions across multiple communications media. As a result, we believe our customers are able to generate additional revenue opportunities, improve profitability, reduce employee turnover, enhance customer retention and improve overall customer satisfaction. We believe our eQuality suite of software and services provide the following key business benefits:
We believe that we are able to provide key business benefits through the innovative features of our eQuality solution, which include the following:
4
Our Strategy
Our objective is to be a leading provider of software and services to global enterprises to help them improve everything from contact center customer interactions to underlying back office processes in order to optimize their workforce performance and capture customer intelligence by recording and analyzing customer interactions across multiple communications media, including telephone, e-mail and the Internet. Key elements of our strategy include the following:
5
Our Products
The eQuality suite of products is comprised of the following applications, listed below and described by function. Prior to 2003, the vast majority of our software revenues were derived from our eQuality Balance and eQuality ContactStore products. During 2004 and 2003, approximately 18% and 13%, of our orders included products other than eQuality Balance and eQuality ContactStore and related products. As a result of our reliance on a limited number of products, any factors affecting the markets for those products could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. We believe our future success will depend on our ability to continue to enhance our current product offerings, such as our eQuality Office offering to avoid their obsolescence while we concurrently develop and introduce new products and offerings that keep pace with competitive and technological advances.
CAPTURE AND RETRIEVE
eQuality ContactStore. eQuality ContactStore records 100% of voice conversations between CSRs and their customers, along with the corresponding computer desktop activity, such as the CSR keystrokes and data input. This application is designed for organizations with high-volume recording requirements, including compliance recording and/or sales verification, in either traditional or IP telephony environments. eQuality ContactStore Plus provides a single solution for capturing customer intelligence. Users can record 100% of customer interactions, and then proactively organize them, based on business rules they define, into designated contact folders for easy access and replay. eQuality ContactStore Express is designed specifically for the needs of SMBs, branch offices or departments, providing a 100% recording solution that requires minimal technical skills to deploy and use.
eQuality Balance. eQuality Balance records multimedia interactions, including traditional voice, Web chat, instant messaging, guided browser sessions and e-mail, based on user-defined business rules. The CSR's voice interaction with a customer can be synchronized with the CSR's corresponding computer desktop activities, such as data entry, screen navigation and data retrieval. This enables companies to evaluate the performance of CSRs, determine whether the necessary technology resources for customer support are available to the CSRs and ascertain whether the CSRs are making effective and efficient use of these resources. Supervisors can use this information to train CSRs, improve company systems and resources designed to support CSRs and enhance the quality of the services being delivered to customers.
eQuality Evaluation. The eQuality Evaluation application facilitates the review, evaluation and scoring of CSRs, providing an immediate summary of a CSR's performance. Using eQuality Evaluation, CSR supervisors can build custom evaluation forms that are designed to collect information about aspects of a CSR's performance that are most important to them. Supervisors and others can input information regarding a CSR's performance into the form, which is then collected in a database. The collected information can be retrieved, presented in a summary format, analyzed and ultimately used to measure and improve a CSR's performance. eQuality Evaluation can reveal problem areas, issues, trends and opportunities. Supervisors and others with access to eQuality Evaluation can review CSRs' performance and determine opportunities to increase their skill levels through training. Supervisors can compare CSRs' performance to current goals and develop more realistic future goals. eQuality Evaluation has historically been, and will continue to be, licensed together with the eQuality Balance application.
eQuality Office. The eQuality Office offering is a combination of eQuality Balance, eQuality Evaluation, eQuality Focus and eQuality Producer, which helps companies audit critical business functions to better understand the inter-departmental impact back office functions have on customer service and satisfaction. eQuality Office also helps companies address specific "root causes" of
6
customer contacts into the contact center, enabling them to uncover data entry errors, compliance issues and ineffective processes.
REPORT AND ANALYZE
eQuality Analysis. The eQuality Analysis application provides a more comprehensive analysis of customer interaction and CSR performance by bridging the disparate information systems of a company. Using eQuality Analysis, a company can combine data derived from eQuality Evaluation with data obtained from a company's other business systems, such as CRM and enterprise resource planning software and integrated telephony applications. Combining multiple sources of data from within the company into a common analysis and reporting system allows for a more thorough evaluation of CSR and overall contact center performance. Recognizing the importance of multi-channel contact centers, we have designed eQuality Analysis to integrate with business systems that collect data from a broad range of communications media. With its performance scorecard, contact center managers can obtain a quick, streamlined view of performance relative to strategic organizational objectives. The software leverages a variety of industry-accepted, best-practice key performance indicators ("KPIs") contained in eQuality Analysis and includes pre-defined KPIs as a foundation to build customized measures. Users can view data and drill up and down into an area of interest. eQuality Analysis produces a wide array of user-defined summary (historical and trend) and detailed analysis (adherence, productivity, quality and others) in a report, graph or exported medium. The solution's reporting, dynamic analysis and performance scorecard capabilities provide organizations with business intelligence that can lead to increased revenue, heightened service quality and improved operational efficiencies.
eQuality Vision. eQuality Vision enables the rapid search and retrieval of recorded customer interactions. With the solution's powerful data visualization capabilities, contact center management can pinpoint and view contacts of interest. Through its color-coding classification of calls based on nature and outcome, patterns and trends, key areas of interest are identifiable, providing unique visualization that allows users to search through contact recordings and focus on those of interest.
eQuality CallMiner. eQuality CallMiner extracts key information from recorded calls, either key words or phrases, using speech recognition. It evaluates each call and stores the relevant information in a data mart for detailed analysis and flags calls of interest for in-depth review.
eQuality Focus. eQuality Focus monitors desktop activities and provides graphical reports to illustrate which applications employees use, including how they use them, when and for how long. With this information, contact center management can gain an analytical view of desktop workflow, as well as whether business applications and productivity tools are correctly configured for optimum use.
LEARN AND TRAIN
eQuality Now. The eQuality Now application delivers ongoing training tailored to CSR competencies, which helps companies build customer loyalty through a more highly skilled and motivated workforce. The electronic learning management software integrates with leading on-line learning products focused on CSR soft and hard skills. By recording customer interactions, evaluating CSR performance, and then using eQuality Now to prioritize training, contact centers have an integrated, closed-loop solution for applying organizational learning. The result is an effective environment for continuous performance improvement that helps companies ensure their customers receive consistent service across all touch-points.
eQuality Courseware. eQuality Courseware enhances the skills of CSRs with targeted learning that is delivered to the CSRs' desktops. eQuality Courseware includes a series of 35 lessons in seven contact center skill tracks.
7
eQuality Producer. eQuality Producer is a customized contact center e-learning solution that leverages real-life scenarios agents encounter on a daily basis to create company-specific content. eQuality Producer enables organizations to address skill deficiencies with e-learning based on actual customer interactions. Once produced, the content is readily available, creating a dynamic learning environment in which CSRs simulate customer contacts.
Services
Our services organization, the Witness Services Network, provides an integrated implementation, training and business consulting methodology that supports an effective and rapid deployment of the eQuality suite enabling organizations to more quickly realize the benefits of our solution.
The Witness Services Network addresses a wide variety of issues through these offerings.
Customers
Our customers include large Fortune 100 companies and small companies with a varying number of contact center sites and/or other business environments. Our customers come from the banking and finance, insurance, outsourcing, technology, retail, telecommunications, travel, hospitality, healthcare, automotive, publishing and utility industries. As of December 31, 2004, we had licensed our software to
8
approximately 1,400 customers at approximately 2,800 sites. To date, customer installations have ranged from small business IP deployments at a single-site contact center having 25 CSRs, to customers with 32 contact centers having an aggregate of approximately 16,000 CSRs. No individual customer accounted for 10% or more of our revenue in 2004, 2003 and 2002.
Sales and Marketing
We sell our software through a combination of a direct sales force and an indirect sales channel consisting of systems integrators, distributors, resellers and OEMs. As of December 31, 2004, our sales organization operated in 26 offices throughout the United States and in Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Japan, Mexico, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom.
Our direct sales force is responsible for pursuing qualified leads generated internally and also qualified leads provided by companies with which we have formal or informal referral arrangements. Our direct sales cycle typically begins with the qualification of a sales lead or the request for a proposal from a prospective customer. The sales lead, or request for a proposal, is followed by an assessment of the customer's requirements, a formal proposal, presentations and product demonstrations, site visits to an existing customer using the software, and contract negotiation. The initial sales cycle can vary substantially from customer to customer but typically lasts six months, and is considered completed with the signing of the contract. Historically, most of our customers have increased their use of the software to expand the number of CSR seats and applications at existing sites and to license additional contact centers, with a lesser incremental sales effort required for these follow-on orders.
To expand the coverage and support of our direct sales force, we sell our products through our indirect sales channels. We identify prospective indirect sales channel participants based on the markets they serve and the desirability of their client bases as users of our products. Each of our relationships with channel participants is memorialized in a written agreement, none of which is individually material to our business. We enter into referral agreements with strategic partners, such as systems integrators, that identify customer referrals or sales leads and support us in the sales process in exchange for a referral fee that is paid upon completion of an end-user sale. Systems integrators are information technology ("IT") consulting service companies who recommend our products during client engagements.
Our distributor agreements grant third parties the right to sub-license our software directly to end-users and through other resellers, and if certified by us, to provide installation and support services within a specified territory. By entering into a distributor agreement, distributors are able to purchase our products at a discount, which varies depending upon the volume of business they transact and their level of involvement in providing installation and support services.
Our reseller agreements grant third parties the right to sub-license our software directly to end-users, and if certified by us, to provide installation and support services within a specified territory. Resellers are also generally entitled to purchase products from us at a discount based on the volume of business they do, their level of participation in the sales and pre-sales process and their level of involvement in providing installation and support services. Through OEM agreements, we co-develop products, which are sold by the OEM as part of their portfolio of products. Our distributor, reseller and OEM agreements are not exclusive and may be terminated by either party at any time.
To support our indirect sales channel, we provide sales training, sales and marketing program support, collateral marketing materials, demonstration tools and ongoing relationship management so that our sales channel participants can more effectively educate potential customers about the benefits of our solution. In addition, we provide training to our distributors and resellers to enable them to provide installation services and end-user training for our products. Our sales channel participants can also access a "partner portal" on our Web site, where they can download marketing materials,
9
descriptions of our products, technical product information and educational materials, which facilitate meaningful sales and service.
We also use a variety of marketing programs to build brand name awareness, as well as to attract potential customers. These programs include market research, product and strategy updates with industry analysts, public relations activities, direct mail and relationship marketing programs, seminars, trade shows, advertising, speaking engagements and Web site marketing. To support sales efforts, the marketing organization also produces marketing materials, including brochures, data sheets and other technical descriptions, presentations and demonstrations. As of December 31, 2004, we had 148 employees in our sales and marketing organization.
Research and Development
We believe our software development capabilities are essential to our strategy of enhancing our core technology, developing additional applications, incorporating that technology and maintaining the competitiveness of our software. We devote a substantial portion of our resources to developing new software and features, extending and improving our software technology, debugging and quality testing our products and researching new technological initiatives in our market. We believe that our future success depends in part upon our ability to continue to enhance existing software, respond to changing customer requirements and develop and introduce new or enhanced software that incorporates new technological developments and emerging industry standards.
As of December 31, 2004, we had 233 people (including 145 contractors located in the Asia-Pacific region) engaged in research and development activities. In April 2004, we began implementing a strategic initiative to significantly expand and improve our development capabilities by transitioning a portion of our development function to the Asia-Pacific region. As of December 31, 2004, we doubled our development capacity by adding the personnel in the Asia Pacific region and incurring approximately $4.5 million for equipment and duplicative ramp-up, salaries, training and severance costs associated with the development transition. Research and development expenditures for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002 were $20.9 million, $18.0 million and $15.1 million, respectively. We anticipate that our research and development costs as a percentage of total revenue will decrease in 2005 as compared to 2004.
Competition
Our software and services compete in the emerging market for products that record and analyze customer interactions and provide electronic learning applications. This market is intensely competitive and experiences rapid changes in technology. We believe that we compete effectively and that we enjoy a competitive advantage based upon (1) the functionality and quality of our products, (2) the ease of use and ability of our products to operate with a variety of hardware and software products, (3) our ability as a single vendor to offer a full suite of applications, (4) our ability to implement our products quickly, (5) the responsiveness of our customer support, and (6) our reputation in the marketplace. Our competitors include:
10
In addition, we have developed, and intend to continue to develop, relationships with companies that resell our software, companies that integrate the software with their technology and products and companies that provide us with customer referrals or leads. Some of these companies have similar, and often more established, relationships with our competitors, and may recommend the products and services of competitors to customers instead of our software and services. In addition, through their relationships with us, these companies could learn about our software and the market for our software and services and could develop and sell competing products and services.
The principal competitive factors in our market include:
Our success will depend on our ability to compete effectively based on these factors. Further, we expect that competition will increase as other established and emerging companies enter our market and as new products, services and technologies are introduced. Increased competition may result in price reductions, lower gross margins and loss of market share. This could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Proprietary Rights
General. Our success depends to a significant degree on the legal protection of our software and other proprietary technology rights. We rely on a combination of patent, trade secret, copyright and trademark laws and confidentiality and non-disclosure agreements with employees and third parties to establish and protect our proprietary rights. These measures may not be sufficient to protect proprietary rights, and we cannot be certain that third parties will not misappropriate our technology and use it for their own benefit. Also, most of these protections do not preclude our competitors from independently developing products with functionality or features substantially equivalent or superior to our software. Any failure to protect our intellectual property could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Licenses. Our licenses are designed to prohibit unauthorized use, copying and disclosure of our software technology. When we license our software to customers, we require license agreements
11
containing confidentiality terms customary in the industry in order to protect our proprietary rights in the software. These agreements generally warrant that the software will materially comply with written documentation. We assert that we own the software we distribute and have not violated the intellectual property rights of others. We license our products in a format that does not permit the users to change the software code. In addition, because we treat the source code for our products as a trade secret, all employees and third parties who require access to the source code are first required to sign non-disclosure agreements.
Patents. As of December 31, 2004, we had five U.S. and three international patents, and 15 patent applications pending in the U.S. and five patent applications pending internationally. There is no guarantee that the pending applications will result in issued patents or, if issued, will provide us with any competitive advantages. We cannot assure you that we will file further patent, trademark or copyright applications, that any future applications will be approved, that any existing or future patents, trademarks or copyrights will adequately protect our intellectual property or that any existing or future patents, trademarks or copyrights will not be challenged by third parties.
Trademarks and service marks. As of December 31, 2004, we had seven registered trademarks and one trademark application pending in the U.S. We also claim common law protections for other marks we use in our business. Competitors and other companies could adopt similar marks, or try to prevent us from using our marks, consequently impeding our ability to build brand identity and possibly leading to customer confusion. We are aware of certain uses, U.S. trademark registrations, and U.S. trademark applications for our "eQuality" trademark and its variations that predate our use and the April 30, 2002 issuance of the U.S. registration for our trademark eQuality®. It is possible that the owner of legal rights resulting from one or more of these prior uses, U.S. trademark registrations, or U.S. trademark applications will bring legal action to challenge our registration of and/or our continued use of the trademark eQuality®, and may also seek compensation for damages resulting from our use of our registered trademark if such challenging party prevails on such a claim. As a result, we cannot assure you that our registration of this trademark will be undisturbed, or that this use will not result in liability for trademark infringement, trademark dilution, and/or unfair competition.
Availability of Reports and Other Information. Our corporate Web site is http://www.witness.com. We make available on this Web site, free of charge, access to our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A and amendments to those materials filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically submit such materials to the Securities and Exchange Commission. In addition, the Commission's Web site is http://www.sec.gov. The Commission makes available on its Web site, free of charge, reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers, such as us, that file electronically with the Commission. Information provided on our Web site or on the Commission's Web site is not part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Our principal administrative, marketing, product development, training and support facilities are located in Roswell, Georgia, a suburb of Atlanta, where we lease approximately 96,400 square feet under a lease that expires in 2007. We occupy approximately 26,000 square feet in Leatherhead, United Kingdom under a lease that expires in 2014, which includes administrative, marketing, product development and support facilities. In addition, we lease a total of 30 offices in the United States, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Japan, Mexico, the Netherlands, Singapore and the United Kingdom. We believe our facilities are adequate for our current and expected near-term requirements.
12
From time to time we may be involved in legal proceedings and/or litigation arising in the ordinary course of our business.
On December 11, 2002, we filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division, a lawsuit against Knowlagent, Inc. ("Knowlagent"), which is the assignee of the United States Patent Nos. 6,324,282 B1 and 6,459,787 B2. Knowlagent has accused our eQuality Now software of infringing the above patents. We filed suit seeking a declaration that we did not and do not infringe either of the two patents listed above, as well as a declaration that the above patents are invalid and unenforceable. We also filed a claim requesting that if the patents are found to be valid, that one of our own employees be named the rightful inventor of the patents. We also requested monetary damages in an amount equal to the amount that Knowlagent has received from its use of the above patents. On December 31, 2002, Knowlagent filed its answer to our complaint as well as two counterclaims, alleging that we infringe and contribute to the infringement by others of the above patents; Knowlagent seeks both monetary damages and an injunction in connection with its counterclaim. We are currently in the discovery phase of the lawsuit and believe that any adverse outcome would not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
On July 20, 2004, STS Software Systems Ltd. ("STS Software"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of NICE Systems, Ltd. ("NICE Ltd."), filed a patent infringement suit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York against us ("New York Action"). The New York Action asserts that our products, including eQuality ContactStore for IP, infringe U.S. Patent No. 6,122,665 ("the "665 patent"). On the same day, we filed a declaratory judgment action against STS Software in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia ("Georgia Action"). We seek a declaration from the court that we have not infringed any valid claim of the "665 patent. By Order entered December 16, 2004, Judge Koeltl of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York granted our motion to transfer the New York Action to the Northern District of Georgia, which has now consolidated the former New York Action with the Georgia Action. The case has not yet been set on a discovery calendar and is at the most preliminary stage. We currently believe that any adverse outcome would not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
On August 30, 2004, we filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division, a lawsuit against NICE Systems, Inc. ("NICE Inc."), a wholly-owned subsidiary of NICE Ltd., alleging patent infringement. Specifically, we have alleged that NICE products, including the NiceUniverse products that include screen capture and synchronized screen and voice capture technologies, infringe claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,790,798 ("the "798 Patent") and 6,510,220 ("the "220 Patent"), both entitled "Method and Apparatus for Simultaneously Monitoring Computer User Screen and Telephone Activity from a Remote Location." We have sought an injunction and money damages for NICE's infringement of these two patents. NICE Inc. has answered and counterclaimed for declaratory judgments of non-infringement and invalidity. This suit is at the most preliminary stage.
We are not party to any litigation or other legal proceedings that we believe could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2004.
13
Item 5. Market for Our Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
Common Stock
Our common stock trades on the Nasdaq Stock Market under the symbol "WITS". The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low sale price per share of the common stock on the Nasdaq Stock Market in each of the last eight quarters.
|
High |
Low |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year Ended December 31, 2004: | |||||||
Fourth quarter | $ | 18.21 | $ | 14.12 | |||
Third quarter | $ | 17.14 | $ | 9.64 | |||
Second quarter | $ | 15.21 | $ | 10.33 | |||
First quarter | $ | 14.05 | $ | 8.61 | |||
Year Ended December 31, 2003: | |||||||
Fourth quarter | $ | 10.72 | $ | 4.58 | |||
Third quarter | $ | 5.78 | $ | 4.01 | |||
Second quarter | $ | 5.34 | $ | 2.97 | |||
First quarter | $ | 3.74 | $ | 2.68 |
The closing sale price of our common stock as reported by the Nasdaq Stock Market on February 28, 2005 was $18.71.
Dividend Policy. We have not paid any cash dividends on our common stock to date. Our Board of Directors determines whether or not we will pay dividends. The Board of Directors considers a number of factors in deciding whether or not to pay dividends, including our earnings, our capital requirements and our financial condition. Currently, the Board of Directors intends to retain all earnings, if any, for use in our business operations and, accordingly, does not expect to declare or pay any dividends in the foreseeable future.
Rule 10b5-1Trading Plans. Our Board of Directors approved an amendment to our insider trading policy to permit our officers, directors and other insiders to enter into trading plans or arrangements to sell shares of our common stock complying with Rule 10b5-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Trading plans provide for sales, subject to price restrictions, daily limits and other contingencies, of shares of our common stock.
Holders. As of February 28, 2005, we had approximately 147 holders of record of our common stock. We believe that we have more than 4,200 beneficial owners.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Period |
Total Number of Shares Purchased |
Average Price Paid per Share |
Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs |
Maximum Number of Shares (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oct. 1, 2004 - Oct. 31, 2004 | | | | $ | 6,901,182.50 | ||||
Nov. 1, 2004 - Nov. 30, 2004 | | | | $ | 6,901,182.50 | ||||
Dec. 1, 2004 - Dec. 31, 2004 | | | | $ | 6,901,182.50 |
14
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
The following selected consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto and with "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" included elsewhere in this report (in thousands except for per share data):
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2004 |
2003(a) |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|||||||||||||
Statement of Operations Data: | ||||||||||||||||||
Revenue: | ||||||||||||||||||
Product | $ | 57,620 | $ | 46,238 | $ | 33,383 | $ | 39,926 | $ | 30,307 | ||||||||
Services | 83,715 | 61,799 | 34,303 | 22,596 | 14,435 | |||||||||||||
Total revenue | 141,335 | 108,037 | 67,686 | 62,522 | 44,742 | |||||||||||||
Cost of revenue: | ||||||||||||||||||
Product | 13,784 | 11,580 | 1,132 | 602 | 436 | |||||||||||||
Services | 32,594 | 24,278 | 12,286 | 10,448 | 8,515 | |||||||||||||
Total cost of revenue | 46,378 | 35,858 | 13,418 | 11,050 | 8,951 | |||||||||||||
Gross profit | 94,957 | 72,179 | 54,268 | 51,472 | 35,791 | |||||||||||||
Operating expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative | 65,051 | 60,003 | 40,439 | 40,968 | 31,357 | |||||||||||||
Research and development | 20,856 | 18,036 | 15,090 | 13,611 | 10,379 | |||||||||||||
Merger-related costs | 498 | 7,865 | | | | |||||||||||||
Acquired in-process research and development and related charges | | 7,840 | | 4,823 | | |||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) | 8,552 | (21,565 | ) | (1,261 | ) | (7,930 | ) | (5,945 | ) | |||||||||
Interest and other income, net | 1,206 | 1,303 | 1,570 | 2,866 | 3,979 | |||||||||||||
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes and extraordinary loss | 9,758 | (20,262 | ) | 309 | (5,064 | ) | (1,966 | ) | ||||||||||
Provision for income taxes | 312 | 307 | 261 | 116 | | |||||||||||||
Income (loss) before extraordinary loss | 9,446 | (20,569 | ) | 48 | (5,180 | ) | (1,966 | ) | ||||||||||
Extraordinary loss on the early extinguishment of debt | | | | | (248 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | 9,446 | (20,569 | ) | 48 | (5,180 | ) | (2,214 | ) | ||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends and accretion | | | | | (611 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) applicable to common stockholders | $ | 9,446 | $ | (20,569 | ) | $ | 48 | $ | (5,180 | ) | $ | (2,825 | ) | |||||
Net income (loss) per sharebasic: | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before extraordinary loss | $ | 0.40 | $ | (0.94 | ) | $ | 0.00 | $ | (0.23 | ) | $ | (0.13 | ) | |||||
Extraordinary loss | | | | | (0.01 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 0.40 | $ | (0.94 | ) | $ | 0.00 | $ | (0.23 | ) | $ | (0.14 | ) | |||||
Net income (loss) per sharediluted: | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before extraordinary loss | $ | 0.36 | $ | (0.94 | ) | $ | 0.00 | $ | (0.23 | ) | $ | (0.13 | ) | |||||
Extraordinary loss | | | | | (0.01 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 0.36 | $ | (0.94 | ) | $ | 0.00 | $ | (0.23 | ) | $ | (0.14 | ) | |||||
Shares used in computing net income (loss) per share: | ||||||||||||||||||
Basic | 23,361 | 21,991 | 22,626 | 22,258 | 19,997 | |||||||||||||
Diluted | 26,084 | 21,991 | 23,524 | 22,258 | 19,997 | |||||||||||||
Balance Sheet Data: | ||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 42,641 | $ | 21,517 | $ | 30,089 | $ | 9,297 | $ | 27,590 | ||||||||
Working capital | 60,114 | 28,697 | 59,435 | 55,953 | 58,512 | |||||||||||||
Total assets | 124,499 | 104,035 | 87,141 | 84,166 | 86,466 | |||||||||||||
Total stockholders' equity | 74,374 | 49,995 | 65,074 | 66,054 | 69,588 |
15
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto included elsewhere in this report. Investors should carefully review the information contained in this report under the caption "Factors That May Affect Our Future Results and Market Price of Our Stock" beginning on page 30.
Overview
We provide the contact center market an integrated performance optimization software suite that enables global enterprises to capture customer intelligence and optimize workforce performance. Our solution is comprised of Voice over Internet Protocol ("VoIP") telephony, compliance, high-volume and business-driven recording solutions, as well as performance analysis and e-learning applications. Our software suite delivers an integrated system for continuous performance improvement in multimedia customer interaction centers, Internet Protocol ("IP") telephony and back office environments. These applications are designed to enhance the quality of customer interactions across multiple communications media, including the telephone, e-mail and the Internet, and are used primarily in the organization's contact center(s). Our enterprise collaboration architecture allows contact center management to share information gathered in the contact center with other departments that service the customer, as well as throughout the organization. The result is a proactive management tool for optimizing their customer relationship management ("CRM"), improving communication among departments, and fine-tuning workflow, processes and quality of service from within the contact center and throughout the enterprise. As a result, we believe our customers are able to generate additional revenue opportunities, improve profitability, enhance customer retention, reduce employee turnover and improve their overall customer service and intelligence. Using an integrated business consulting, installation and training methodology, we provide services to support an effective and rapid deployment of our software that enables organizations to maximize their return on an investment in our products and services. Our software is designed to integrate with a variety of third-party software applications, such as CRM and enterprise resource planning applications, and with existing telephony and computer network hardware and software. Many of our customers are companies with an international presence and one or more contact centers that handle voice and data customer interactions for outbound sales and marketing operations, inbound service/support lines, or both.
We derive product revenue by licensing software and derive services revenue by providing related installation, training, consulting, and maintenance services. We also derived a relatively small portion of product revenue by selling hardware to customers during 2004 and 2003 subsequent to the acquisition of Eyretel plc ("Eyretel") in March 2003. To date, eQuality Balance and eQuality ContactStore, our business-driven and/or full-time customer interaction recording solutions, have generated the majority of our product revenue. We sell our products through our direct sales force and through our indirect sales channels. Our indirect sales channels consist of distributors, resellers, systems integrators and Original Equipment Manufacturers ("OEM"). Distributors and resellers purchase product from us at a discount and then resell our products to end-users (or, in the case of distributors, to other resellers) and referral partners are paid a fee for referring sales leads to us or for assisting us in a sales order. Systems integrators are information technology ("IT") consulting service companies who recommend our products during client engagements. Through OEM agreements, we co-develop products, which are sold by the OEM as part of their portfolio of products.
We plan to grow our product revenue and maintain our competitive position from a technology perspective through the timely introduction of new products, such as performance analysis and e-learning management applications, and platforms, such as VoIP product offerings, all of which are currently offered to our customers. Although sales of such products have not been material to date, we believe that our VoIP product offerings represent a material growth opportunity for us as the market
16
transitions to an Internet protocol ("IP") technology environment. In addition, we believe our product offerings can be marketed toward back-office initiatives for business process monitoring, which represents a new market for us. In January 2005, we consummated the acquisition of Blue Pumpkin, Inc., ("Blue Pumpkin") in order to extend our contact center performance optimization capability to include advanced workforce management software and services solutions. The acquisition expands our software and service offerings by adding forecasting, scheduling, adherence and planning applications. (See "Subsequent Event" for further information regarding the acquisition of Blue Pumpkin.) We also intend to continue to expand our global sales channels by entering into new reseller, distributor, OEM and similar arrangements with key vendors in the contact center workforce optimization market. During 2004, 32% of total product revenue, excluding hardware revenue, was derived from the indirect sales channel, compared to 31% in 2003. Factors that may impact our ability to grow our product revenue, however, include our ability to remain competitive from a technology perspective; market acceptance of our new products; our ability to maintain our product pricing integrity; and our ability to expand our global sales channels.
We also plan to grow our services revenue in concert with our product revenue. When our customers license our products, they generally purchase installation, training and one year of support services. Therefore, as we generate product revenue, we also generate related services revenue. In addition, our customers generally renew their maintenance contracts with us each year. Therefore, our maintenance revenue increases as our customer base increases. Factors that may influence our ability to grow our services revenue, however, include our ability to continue to increase product revenues and our ability to maintain a high level of customer satisfaction.
Corporate spending for IT and CRM applications remained relatively constant in 2003 and we experienced nominal organic growth in 2004. While the economic environment remains challenging, we are forecasting additional revenue growth for 2005.
During 2004, we implemented a strategic initiative to expand our software development capabilities in the Asia-Pacific region. As of December 31, 2004, we had doubled our development capacity from the prior year by transitioning a portion of our development function to the Asia-Pacific region and incurred approximately $4.5 million for equipment and duplicative ramp-up, salaries, training and severance costs associated with the development transition.
During the second quarter of 2003, we completed the acquisition of Eyretel, a United Kingdom-based provider of compliance and recording solutions for customer contact centers, for $59.7 million. We began consolidating Eyretel's results on March 22, 2003, the date we assumed majority ownership of Eyretel. We acquired Eyretel with the intent to extend our presence in international markets and to expand our product line by adding a full-time compliance recording solution. Our product offerings were complementary to those of Eyretel's. Prior to the acquisition, our principal focus had been software to improve the quality of contact center performance, whereas substantially all of Eyretel's sales were attributable to its full-time compliance recording solution. In addition to this opportunity to expand our product line, Eyretel was attractive to us because it derived nearly half of its revenues from Europe, the Middle East and Africa, and another 24% from the Asia Pacific region, and thus afforded us an opportunity to quickly gain access to those markets, and to expand our indirect sales channel. During 2003, we successfully integrated the two companies in terms of product offerings and business operations and 2004 reflects a full 12 months of our combined product offering.
We are headquartered in Roswell, Georgia and have other offices throughout the United States. We deliver our products and services internationally through our offices in Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Germany, India, Japan, Mexico, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa and the United Kingdom. During 2004, 2003 and 2002, 48%, 45% and 25%, respectively, of our revenue was derived from customers outside the United States. We had 485 full-time employees, excluding approximately 150 contractors located in the Asia-Pacific region, at December 31, 2004, compared to 497 at
17
December 31, 2003 and 309 at December 31, 2002. As of December 31, 2004, 183 full-time employees were located outside the United States.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make certain estimates and judgments that affect our reported assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and our related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we re-evaluate our estimates, including those related to revenue recognition, the collectibility of receivables, accounting for acquisitions, impairment of long-lived assets, income taxes and stock-based compensation. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. A summary of our critical accounting policies follows.
Revenue Recognition. We recognize revenue in accordance with the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants' Statement of Position ("SOP") No. 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, and SOP No. 98-9, Modification of SOP 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, With Respect to Certain Transactions. Revenue is primarily derived from licensing software and providing related services including maintenance. During 2004 and 2003, we also had a relatively small portion of hardware revenue, which commenced upon the acquisition of Eyretel. Product revenue, which includes software and hardware, is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery of the product has occurred, the fee is fixed or determinable, collection is probable and vendor specific objective evidence ("VSOE") exists to allocate revenue to the undelivered elements of the arrangement. We report hardware revenue gross in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") No. 99-19, Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal versus Net as an Agent, because the factors indicating gross reporting outweigh the factors indicating net reporting. We recognize revenue using the residual method of accounting since we generally have VSOE of fair value for maintenance and professional services, but not for the software and hardware elements of the order. Under the residual method, services revenue, including maintenance and professional services, is deferred at an amount equal to its fair value until those elements are delivered. Consequently, product revenue for the software and hardware may be recognized (i) upon delivery of those products when we have VSOE on the related maintenance and professional services sold and (ii) at an amount representing the difference between the total order amount and the amount deferred. Services revenue includes installation, training, consulting, maintenance and reimbursable travel expenses. Revenue from installation, training and consulting services is recognized upon performance of the related services and is offered and billed as separate elements of contracts. Reimbursable travel expenses revenue is recognized upon incurrence of the related expenses. The functionality of the software and any hardware sold is not dependent on installation and training services and customization is not required to enable our customers to use our products. Maintenance is offered as a separate element and the majority of contracts include the right to unspecified upgrades on a when-and-if available basis. Maintenance revenue is deferred and recognized ratably over the term of the related contract.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts. We perform ongoing evaluations of our customers and continuously monitor collections and payments and estimate an allowance for doubtful accounts based on the aging of the underlying receivables, our historical experience and any specific customer collection issues that we have identified. While such credit losses have historically been within our expectations and we believe appropriate reserves have been established, we cannot assure that we will continue to experience the same credit loss rates that we have experienced in the past or adequately predict future credit losses. If the financial condition of our customers were to deteriorate and resulted in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required which would
18
result in an additional selling, general and administrative expense in the period such determination is made.
Our revenue recognition policy is significant because our revenues are a key component of our results of operations. We follow very specific and detailed guidelines, discussed above, in measuring revenues; however, certain judgments and estimates affect the application of our revenue policy described above. Further, assessment of collectibility is particularly critical in determining whether or not revenues should be recognized in the current market environment. We also record provisions for estimated sales allowances on product and service related revenues at the time the related revenues are recorded. These estimates are based on historical sales and services allowances, analysis of customer credits and other known factors. If future sales credits prove to be greater than the historical data and the estimates we used to calculate these provisions, our revenues could be overstated.
Accounting for Acquisitions. Accounting for acquisitions requires management to make judgments and estimates in determining the purchase price, the fair value of the assets and liabilities acquired and merger-related and restructuring expenses. In recording the Eyretel acquisition in 2003, management estimates primarily related to the following purchase price components or merger-related costs:
Changes to purchase price estimates, prior to the completion of the final purchase price allocation, are reflected as adjustments to goodwill and/or other acquired assets. Subsequent adjustments are reflected in our results of operations.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets. Long-lived assets, such as property and equipment and intangible assets, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. All of our intangible assets are amortized using the straight-line method. Useful lives of amortizable intangible assets are reviewed annually with any changes in estimated useful lives being accounted for prospectively over the revised remaining useful life. Recoverability of assets to be held and used would be measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to the estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized in the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. The determination of estimated future cash flows, however, would require management to make estimates. Future events and changes in circumstances may require us to record a significant impairment charge in the period in which such events or changes occur. Impairment testing requires considerable analysis and judgment in determining the results. If other assumptions and estimates were used in our evaluations, the results could differ significantly.
Accounting for Income Taxes. We account for income taxes in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, which requires companies to recognize deferred income tax assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates for temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of recorded assets and liabilities and expected benefits of utilizing net operating loss and credit carryforwards. SFAS No. 109 also requires that deferred income tax assets be reduced by a valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred income tax assets will not be realized. We evaluate the realizability of our
19
deferred income tax assets, primarily resulting from net operating loss and credit carryforwards, and adjust our valuation allowance, if necessary.
Once we utilize our net operating loss carryforwards, we would expect our provision for income tax expense in future periods to reflect an effective tax rate that will be significantly higher than past periods. Furthermore, the utilization of certain net operating loss carryforwards arising from acquisitions will result in a reduction of the valuation allowance for the deferred income tax assets and intangible assets of $6.7 million.
Estimates and judgments are required in determining our worldwide income tax expense. In the ordinary course of conducting business globally, there are many transactions and calculations whose ultimate tax outcome cannot be certain. Although we believe our estimates and judgments are reasonable, no assurance can be given that the final tax outcome of these matters will not be different from what is reflected in our historical income tax provisions and accruals. Such differences could have a material impact on our income tax provision and operating results in the period in which such a determination is made.
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Staff Position No. FAS 109-2, Accounting and Disclosure Guidance for the Foreign Earnings Repatriation Provision within the American Jobs Creations Act of 2004. Corporations are allowed an 85% dividends received deduction in 2004 and 2005 on the repatriation of certain foreign earnings to a U.S. taxpayer, provided certain criteria are met. In 2005, we will complete our evaluation of the effects of the repatriation provision. At this time, the range of possible amounts that may be considered for repatriation, if any, and the tax effects of these amounts under this provision are unknown.
Stock-Based Compensation. We generally do not record compensation expense for options granted to our employees because all options granted under our stock option plans have an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. As permitted under SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based CompensationTransition and Disclosure, and SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, we have elected to continue to apply the provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and have adopted the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123. The pro forma disclosures of stock-based compensation include the use of certain input factors in calculating the fair value of stock option grants, some of which require management to make estimates and use judgment. In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123R (Revised 2004), Share-Based Payment, which requires that the compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions be recognized in financial statements based on alternative fair value models. The share-based compensation cost will be measured based on the fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued. Upon adoption, pro forma disclosure will no longer be an alternative. We currently intend to apply SFAS No. 123R using the most appropriate fair value model as of the interim reporting period beginning July 1, 2005. We are evaluating the requirements under SFAS 123R and expect the adoption to have a significant adverse impact on our results of operations, but not on our cash flows.
20
The table below shows operating data as a percentage of total revenue for the periods indicated:
|
Year Ended December 31, |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
||||||
Revenue: | |||||||||
Product | 41 | % | 43 | % | 49 | % | |||
Services | 59 | 57 | 51 | ||||||
Total revenue | 100 | 100 | 100 | ||||||
Cost of revenue: | |||||||||
Product | 10 | 11 | 2 | ||||||
Services | 23 | 22 | 18 | ||||||
Total cost of revenue | 33 | 33 | 20 | ||||||
Gross profit | 67 | 67 | 80 | ||||||
Operating expenses: | |||||||||
Selling, general and administrative | 46 | 56 | 60 | ||||||
Research and development | 15 | 17 | 22 | ||||||
Merger-related costs | 0 | 7 | 0 | ||||||
Acquired in-process research and development | 0 | 7 | 0 | ||||||
Operating income (loss) | 6 | (20 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||
Interest and other income, net | 1 | 1 | 2 | ||||||
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes | 7 | (19 | ) | 0 | |||||
Provision for income taxes | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
Net income (loss) | 7 | (19 | ) | 0 | |||||
Impact of Eyretel Acquisition
The acquisition of Eyretel increased our reported revenues and expenses in 2003 compared to 2002. In addition, our gross profit margins were adversely impacted during 2003 compared to 2002 due to the inclusion of hardware revenue without any significant profit margin and amortization of intangible assets arising from the Eyretel acquisition. Operating expenses, expressed as a percentage of total revenue, increased in 2003 compared to 2002 due to the increase of $7.8 million for the acquired in-process research and development costs and the increase of $7.9 million in merger-related and restructuring costs. We estimate that the acquisition of Eyretel contributed approximately $50 million of additional annual revenue and that we achieved approximately $20 million of annual expense savings, primarily though reductions in overhead and personnel. We believe that revenue and expenses beginning in the last half of 2003 reflected the full impact of the Eyretel acquisition and integration.
Revenue
Total revenue increased 31% to $141.3 million in 2004 compared to 2003 and 60% to $108.0 million in 2003 compared to 2002 due to increases in product and services revenue. The number of installed customer sites grew to 2,799 sites at the end of 2004 from 2,341 sites at the end of 2003 and 1,177 sites at the end of 2002. International revenue increased 41% in 2004 compared to 2003 and 182% in 2003 compared to 2002, due to the acquisition of Eyretel, which was based in the United Kingdom and had a broad international presence. In addition, the weakening of the U.S. dollar against certain foreign currencies increased revenue by approximately 5% and 4% in 2004 and 2003 compared to the prior years.
21
Product revenue includes software revenue and hardware revenue. Hardware revenue was a new revenue stream beginning in the second quarter of 2003 resulting from the Eyretel acquisition. Because hardware sales negatively impact our gross profit margin, we are working towards transitioning our customers to third-party hardware suppliers and, as a result, expect hardware revenue to decline in the future. Product revenue, excluding hardware revenue of $7.6 million in 2004 and $6.3 million in 2003, increased 25% and 20% in 2004 and 2003, respectively, compared to prior years due to increased sales in international markets and to an increase in the number of product offerings within our software product suite. The growth in product revenue in 2004 and 2003 reflects revenue from the Eyretel acquisition since March 2003.
Product revenue as a percentage of total revenue has been decreasing over the previous three years due to increased services revenue, as discussed below. Our product pricing has remained consistent over the previous three years. Product revenue, excluding hardware revenue, derived from our indirect sales channel increased to 32% in 2004 from 31% in 2003 and 23% in 2002. This increase correlates to the increase in international revenue and to continually broadening our target market through our indirect sales channel. If a substantial number of our indirect sales participants were to terminate their relationship with us, we could experience a material decrease to our revenues.
New customers accounted for 22%, 27% and 46%, respectively, of product revenue, excluding hardware revenue, in 2004, 2003 and 2002 compared to follow-on revenue from our existing customer base. We receive follow-on revenue from our customers when they purchase additional user licenses or license additional applications at existing sites and when they license our products at new sites. We expect to continue receiving the majority of our product revenue from existing customers during 2005.
Services revenue, consisting of installation, training, consulting, maintenance support and reimbursable travel expenses, increased 35% to $83.7 million in 2004 compared to 2003 and 80% to $61.8 million in 2003 compared to 2002. These increases were primarily due to the installation and training services related to new product sales and due to customers renewing their maintenance contracts with us thereby increasing our recurring maintenance revenue stream. The growth in services revenue in 2004 and 2003 also reflects revenue from the Eyretel acquisition since March 2003. The percentage of Witness customers that have renewed their maintenance contracts with us has historically exceeded 90%. We believe that maintenance contracts will be renewed at a comparable rate in 2005. Our services pricing has remained consistent over the past three years. We expect services revenue, in absolute dollars, to increase over time due to the compounding effect of renewals of annual maintenance contracts from existing customer sites, and to remain relatively constant as a percentage of total revenue, excluding hardware revenue, in 2005.
Cost of Revenue
Total cost of revenue increased 29% to $46.4 million in 2004 compared to 2003 and 167% to $35.9 million in 2003 compared to 2002. Expressed as a percent of revenue, gross profit margins declined to 67% in 2004 and 2003 from 80% in 2002. Excluding hardware cost of revenue, which was a new cost beginning in the second quarter of 2003 due to the Eyretel acquisition, and the amortization of intangible assets resulting from the Eyretel acquisition, gross profit margins declined to 74% in 2004 and 2003 from 80% in 2002. This decrease was due to the increase in services revenue relative to total revenue excluding hardware. Our profit margin for services is lower than our product profit margin because the costs related to providing services revenue, primarily labor related costs, are higher than those expenses related to generating product revenue. For example, the cost to employ an installation technician is higher than the royalty due a third party for the number of software licenses sold and the cost to produce a CD-ROM containing a copy of one of our software programs for delivery to a client site. We expect our gross profit margin, excluding hardware and amortization of intangible assets, to remain relatively constant in 2005.
22
Cost of product revenue consists of amortization of acquired technology, hardware costs, royalties due to third parties for software components that are embedded in our software applications, amortization of capitalized software development costs and packaging costs. Amortization of acquired technology was $4.4 million and $4.1 million in 2004 and 2003, respectively, and none in 2002. Cost of hardware revenue was $7.3 million and $5.7 million in 2004 and 2003, respectively, and none in 2002. We will continue to incur amortization expense, but expect the cost of hardware to decline as we work towards reducing the amount of hardware sales in the future. Cost of product revenue, excluding amortization of acquired technology and hardware costs, increased 12% in 2004 compared to 2003 and 60% in 2003 compared to 2002. The increase in 2003 was primarily due to increased royalties due to third parties for software components that are embedded in our software applications. Expressed as a percentage of product revenue, excluding hardware, the cost of such revenue, excluding amortization of intangible assets was 4%, 5% and 3% in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. As we develop upgrades of our existing products and add new offerings to our product suite, we may embed third-party technology into our software, which would increase the cost of product revenue in the future.
Cost of services revenue for installation, training, consulting and maintenance services include personnel costs and related expenses and allocated overhead. Personnel costs include salaries, bonuses and benefits. Cost of services revenue increased 34% to $32.6 million in 2004 compared to 2003 due primarily to an increase in the number of employees and contractors engaged in customer support services. Cost of services revenue increased 98% to $24.3 million in 2003 compared to 2002 primarily due to an increase in the number of employees engaged in installation, training, consulting, and customer support services primarily due to the Eyretel acquisition. Cost of services revenue as a percentage of services revenue increased to 39% in 2004 and 2003 from 36% in 2002. This increase was primarily due to the cost of providing hardware support, which commenced in March 2003 in conjunction with the Eyretel acquisition. We anticipate that our services margins will remain relatively constant in 2005. We expect our customer service organization to continue to grow over time and, therefore, we anticipate that our cost of services revenue, in absolute dollars, will increase as we grow our customer base. During the latter half of 2004, we began expanding our customer support organization in the Asia-Pacific region; however, we do not expect to incur any significant incremental costs associated with this initiative.
Operating Expenses
Selling, General and Administrative. Selling, general and administrative ("SG&A") expense consists primarily of personnel costs, sales commissions, marketing programs, professional fees, the amortization of certain intangible assets and provisions for bad debt expense. SG&A expense increased 8% to $65.1 million in 2004 compared to 2003 due primarily to increased third-party costs associated with complying with the rules and regulations adopted under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and increased litigation fees to defend certain lawsuits which offset the decline in bad debt expense of $2.3 million (see Note 14 "Legal Proceedings" of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements). SG&A expense increased 48% to $60.0 million in 2003 compared to 2002. This increase was due to the increased size of our company after the Eyretel acquisition and due to $1.8 million of amortization of acquired intangible assets in 2003 and none in 2002. Bad debt expense also increased by $2.2 million in 2003 compared to 2002 primarily due to an increase in exposure from international receivables. In 2005, we expect SG&A expense to increase in absolute dollars but decrease as a percentage of total revenue due to anticipated revenue growth.
Research and Development. Research and development ("R&D") expenses consist primarily of personnel and consulting costs to support product development, and allocated overhead. R&D costs are generally expensed as incurred and include software development costs incurred prior to the establishment of technological feasibility. Costs incurred subsequent to establishing technological feasibility are capitalized and amortized over their estimated useful lives to cost of product revenue. As of December 31, 2004 and 2003, $0.8 million and $0.6 million, respectively, in software development
23
costs were capitalized of which $0.4 million was amortized to cost of product revenue during 2004. Prior to 2003, software development costs incurred after technological feasibility had been established were not material. R&D expenses increased 16% to $20.9 million in 2004 compared to 2003 due to an increased number of contractors engaged in research and development activities. During 2004, we implemented a strategic initiative to significantly expand and improve our development capabilities by transitioning a portion of our development function to the Asia-Pacific region. As of December 31, 2004, we significantly increased our development capacity from the prior year by adding 145 new contractors to the region and incurred approximately $4.5 million for equipment and duplicative ramp-up, training and severance costs associated with the development transition. R&D expenses increased 20% to $18.0 million in 2003 compared to 2002 primarily due to an increased number of employees engaged in research and development activities. We expect total R&D expense to increase in absolute dollars but decrease as a percentage of total revenue during 2005 as compared to 2004.
Merger-related Costs. During 2004 and 2003, we incurred merger-related costs pertaining to the acquisition of Eyretel in March 2003 and the Blue Pumpkin acquisition that closed in January 2005. (See "Subsequent Event" for further information regarding the acquisition of Blue Pumpkin.) We incurred merger-related costs of $0.5 million during 2004. These merger-related costs included $0.8 million relating to the partial accrual of a bonus payable to Eyretel's former Chief Executive Officer, now our Chief Operating Officer ("COO"), $0.2 million of expenses related to the integration of Blue Pumpkin's operations with Witness, offset by ($0.5) million for adjustments to certain Eyretel acquisition liabilities. In March 2003, our Board of Directors agreed to pay a bonus of £1.0 million to our COO in connection with the Eyretel acquisition and subsequent integration. In March 2004, £0.4 million of this bonus was paid and the remaining balance of £0.6 million (or $1.1 million as of December 31, 2004) is due March 2005. The COO bonus is recognized over the related service period through the first quarter of 2005. We expect to incur additional merger-related costs in 2005 related to the Blue Pumpkin acquisition; however, we are unable to estimate the amount at this time.
We incurred merger-related costs of $7.9 million during 2003. These merger-related costs included $3.9 million of expenses related to integrating Eyretel's software products, training personnel on products acquired and consolidating the operations of Eyretel with Witness, $0.7 million of facilities costs to consolidate Witness' facilities, $1.5 million of expenses related to employee severance and benefits, $0.9 million for a sterling-based forward exchange contract to hedge the dollar cost of the acquisition, and $0.9 million relating primarily to the partial accrual of the aforementioned bonus payable to our COO.
Acquired In-Process Research and Development. In 2003, we estimated that $7.8 million of the purchase price of Eyretel represented acquired in-process research and development ("IPR&D") that had not yet reached technological feasibility as defined by SFAS No. 86, Accounting for the Cost of Computer Software to Be Sold, Leased or Otherwise Marketed, and had no alternative future use. Accordingly, these amounts were immediately charged to expense upon consummation of the acquisition. The value of the IPR&D was calculated with the assistance of an independent third-party appraiser by utilizing a discounted cash flow methodology, focusing on the income-producing capabilities of the in-process technologies and taking into consideration: stage of completion; complexity of work to date and to complete; anticipated product development and introduction schedules; forecasted product sales cycles; internal and external risk factors; revenue and operating expense estimates; contributory asset charges, and costs already incurred and the expected costs to complete. We expect to incur IPR&D charges in 2005 related to the Blue Pumpkin acquisition; however, we are unable to estimate the amount at this time.
Interest and Other Income, Net
Interest and other income, net consists primarily of interest earned on funds available for investment and foreign currency transaction gains and losses on settlement of contracts denominated in
24
currencies other than the local currency. Interest and other income, net decreased 7% to $1.2 million in 2004 compared to 2003 due primarily to a decrease in net foreign currency transaction gains in 2004 which offset increased interest income resulting from higher cash and investment balances. Interest and other income, net decreased 17% to $1.3 million in 2003 compared to 2002 due primarily to decreased interest income resulting from lower yields and lower investment balances as a result of the acquisition of Eyretel which was paid for in cash. We expect that interest and other income, net will decrease significantly in 2005 compared to 2004 due to lower cash and investment balances as a result of our utilizing $40 million of cash to acquire Blue Pumpkin in January 2005.
Provision for Income Taxes
We recorded a provision for federal alternative minimum tax and foreign income tax in 2004 and provisions for foreign income tax in 2003 and 2002, net of federal tax benefits. The provision for income taxes in 2004 benefited from the utilization of net operating loss carryforwards from prior years. We have net operating loss carryforwards aggregating $31.4 million for U.S. tax purposes and $44.4 million for foreign tax purposes remaining as of December 31, 2004. We expect that the provision for income taxes in 2005 will benefit from the utilization of these net operating loss carryforwards. However, the utilization of certain net operating loss carryforwards arising from acquisitions will result in a reduction of the valuation allowance for the deferred income tax assets and intangible assets.
Quarterly Results of Operations
The following tables present unaudited quarterly statements of operations data for each of the last eight quarters in the two-year period ended December 31, 2004, as well as the percentage of total revenue represented by each item. The information has been derived from our unaudited consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared on substantially the same basis as the audited consolidated financial statements contained in this report. The unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments that we consider to be necessary to present fairly this information when read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this report. The results of operations for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any future period.
25
|
Three Months Ended |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Dec. 31, 2004 |
Sept. 30, 2004 |
Jun. 30, 2004 |
Mar. 31, 2004 |
Dec. 31, 2003 |
Sept. 30, 2003 |
Jun. 30, 2003 |
Mar. 31, 2003(a) |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
(in thousands) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Product | $ | 15,655 | $ | 13,925 | $ | 14,138 | $ | 13,902 | $ | 14,251 | $ | 11,000 | $ | 14,320 | $ | 6,667 | |||||||||||
Services | 23,053 | 21,332 | 20,280 | 19,050 | 19,335 | 16,897 | 15,006 | 10,561 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total revenue | 38,708 | 35,257 | 34,418 | 32,952 | 33,586 | 27,897 | 29,326 | 17,228 | |||||||||||||||||||
Cost of revenue: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Product | 3,423 | 2,737 | 3,714 | 3,910 | 4,041 | 2,410 | 4,267 | 862 | |||||||||||||||||||
Services | 8,259 | 8,036 | 8,363 | 7,936 | 7,554 | 6,524 | 6,546 | 3,654 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total cost of revenue | 11,682 | 10,773 | 12,077 | 11,846 | 11,595 | 8,934 | 10,813 | 4,516 | |||||||||||||||||||
Gross profit | 27,026 | 24,484 | 22,341 | 21,106 | 21,991 | 18,963 | 18,513 | 12,712 | |||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative | 17,388 | 16,422 | 15,702 | 15,539 | 17,618 | 15,402 | 16,620 | 10,363 | |||||||||||||||||||
Research and development | 5,548 | 5,470 | 4,963 | 4,875 | 4,726 | 4,804 | 4,707 | 3,799 | |||||||||||||||||||
Merger-related costs | (177 | ) | 152 | 155 | 368 | 1,686 | 1,602 | 2,613 | 1,964 | ||||||||||||||||||
Acquired in-process research and development | | | | | | | | 7,840 | |||||||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) | 4,267 | 2,440 | 1,521 | 324 | (2,039 | ) | (2,845 | ) | (5,427 | ) | (11,254 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Interest and other income, net | 463 | 435 | 137 | 171 | 116 | 321 | 341 | 525 | |||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes | 4,730 | 2,875 | 1,658 | 495 | (1,923 | ) | (2,524 | ) | (5,086 | ) | (10,729 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes | 211 | (68 | ) | 144 | 25 | 109 | 8 | 106 | 84 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 4,519 | 2,943 | $ | 1,514 | $ | 470 | $ | (2,032 | ) | $ | (2,532 | ) | $ | (5,192 | ) | $ | (10,813 | ) | ||||||||
Three Months Ended |
|||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Dec. 31, 2004 |
Sept. 30, 2004 |
Jun. 30, 2004 |
Mar. 31, 2004 |
Dec. 31, 2003 |
Sept. 30, 2003 |
Jun. 30, 2003 |
Mar. 31, 2003(a) |
|||||||||||
|
(as a percentage of total revenue) |
||||||||||||||||||
Revenue: | |||||||||||||||||||
Product | 40 | % | 39 | % | 41 | % | 42 | % | 42 | % | 39 | % | 49 | % | 39 | % | |||
Services | 60 | 61 | 59 | 58 | 58 | 61 | 51 | 61 | |||||||||||
Total revenue | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |||||||||||
Cost of revenue: | |||||||||||||||||||
Product | 9 | 8 | 11 | 12 | 12 | 9 | 15 | 5 | |||||||||||
Services | 21 | 23 | 24 | 24 | 23 | 23 | 22 | 21 | |||||||||||
Total cost of revenue | 30 | 31 | 35 | 36 | 35 | 32 | 37 | 26 | |||||||||||
Gross profit | 70 | 69 | 65 | 64 | 65 | 68 | 63 | 74 | |||||||||||
Operating expenses: | |||||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative | 45 | 46 | 46 | 47 | 52 | 55 | 57 | 60 | |||||||||||
Research and development | 14 | 16 | 15 | 15 | 14 | 17 | 16 | 22 | |||||||||||
Merger-related costs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 9 | 11 | |||||||||||
Acquired in-process research and development | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 46 | |||||||||||
Operating income (loss) | 11 | 7 | 4 | 1 | (6 | ) | (10 | ) | (19 | ) | (65 | ) | |||||||
Interest and other income, net | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes | 12 | 8 | 4 | 1 | (6 | ) | (9 | ) | (18 | ) | (62 | ) | |||||||
Provision for income taxes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |||||||||||
Net income (loss) | 12 | 8 | 4 | 1 | (6 | ) | (9 | ) | (18 | ) | (63 | ) | |||||||
26
The increase in total revenue, beginning in the second quarter of 2003, reflects the consolidation of Eyretel, which was acquired in March 2003. Our second and fourth quarters generally have higher product revenue than the first and third quarters due to our customers' budgeting and spending patterns. Product revenue includes hardware sales of $2.2 million, $1.2 million, $2.0 million and $2.3 million in the fourth, third, second and first quarters of 2004, respectively and $2.0 million, $1.0 million and $3.3 million in the fourth, third and second quarters of 2003, respectively. Services revenue in absolute dollars, and as a percentage of total revenue, generally increased during 2004 and 2003 due to the compounding effect of maintenance renewals and the expansion of our service offerings. The services margin improved in the fourth quarter of 2004 due to efficiencies gained in providing installation, training and consulting services. Gross profit margins have been negatively impacted beginning in the second quarter of 2003 due to hardware costs and amortization of intangibles.
Total operating expenses, excluding merger-related costs and acquired IPR&D, decreased as a percentage of total revenue during 2004 as revenue growth exceeded cost increases. During 2003, total operating expenses, excluding merger-related costs and acquired IPR&D, decreased as a percentage of total revenue due to the realization of synergies from the Eyretel acquisition, in addition to implementing certain cost saving measures throughout the year.
Our quarterly operating results, particularly product revenues, have experienced significant fluctuations in the past and we expect that this pattern will continue in the future. For instance, quarterly results may fluctuate based on the timing of sales due to customer calendar-year budgeting cycles, slow summer purchasing patterns and compensation policies that tend to compensate sales personnel, typically in the latter half of the year, for achieving annual quotas. As a result of the foregoing and other factors, we believe that quarter-to-quarter comparisons of results are not necessarily meaningful, and such comparisons should not be relied upon as indications of future performance.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At December 31, 2004, we had $76.5 million in total cash and cash equivalents and investments, which was $35.6 million higher than the $40.9 million held at December 31, 2003. Working capital also increased by $31.4 million from $28.7 million at December 31, 2003 to $60.1 million at December 31, 2004. Accrued expenses decreased by $6.1 million at December 31, 2004, from December 31, 2003, due primarily to the payment of Eyretel acquisition and merger-related liabilities. Deferred revenue increased by $4.5 million at December 31, 2004, from December 31, 2003, due to primarily to an increase in the number of customers under maintenance contracts.
Cash flows from operating activities provided $22.8 million in 2004 compared to cash flows used in operating activities of $4.1 million in 2003. This increase was due primarily to the increase in operating income, exclusive of non-cash items, which increased to $21.3 million in 2004, from $0.3 million in 2003. This increase resulted from the improvement in operating performance and the reduction in merger-related costs in 2004 compared to 2003. Our annual accounts receivable days sales outstanding ("DSO") decreased from 107 days in 2003 to 66 days in 2004. We expect our DSO to remain at the December 31, 2004 level during 2005. In 2002, we generated $8.9 million in cash flows from operating activities primarily due to net income excluding non-cash items and an increase in deferred revenue.
Net cash flows used in investing activities in 2004 were ($18.3) million, which consisted primarily of the purchase of additional investments. Net cash flows used in investing activities in 2003 were ($10.0) million, which included the sale of investments of $26.5 million to initially fund the Eyretel acquisition, partially offset by the acquisition of Eyretel for ($21.4) million (net of $38.8 million in cash held by Eyretel) and certain other assets purchased for $2.4 million from a software and services company focused on the business intelligence marketplace. Net cash flows provided by investing activities in 2002 were $14.2 million due primarily to the release of our restricted cash and the maturities of certain
27
investments. Capital expenditures of ($2.9) million, ($2.2) million and ($3.2) million in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively, were primarily for computer equipment and leasehold improvements.
Net cash flows provided by financing activities in 2004 were $13.3 million compared to $1.3 million in 2003. The increase was primarily due to $12.6 million of proceeds from the exercise of stock options. Net cash flows used in financing activities were ($1.1) million in 2002 primarily due to stock repurchases of ($2.4) million. We have repurchased a total of $3.1 million of our common stock under our $10 million stock repurchase authorization and at this time, we do not anticipate making any further repurchases.
At December 31, 2004, we had $12.2 million available under a line of credit, which was net of outstanding letters of credit of $2.8 million. The letters of credit secure the lease on our corporate headquarters facility and have decreasing schedules that ultimately expire in 2007. At our election, borrowings under the line of credit bear interest at the bank's prime rate, or LIBOR plus 300 basis points, and are limited to 85% of eligible accounts receivable, as defined by the agreement. The revolving line of credit is secured by all of our assets and requires compliance with various covenants, including liquidity ratios and tangible net worth requirements, among others. As of December 31, 2004, we were in compliance with all bank covenants. In association with a 2005 acquisition, we replaced our tangible net worth requirement with an EBITDA financial covenant. (See "Subsequent Event" for further information regarding the acquisition of Blue Pumpkin.)
In January 2005, we liquidated our investment portfolio and paid $40.0 million in cash for the acquisition of Blue Pumpkin. In addition, we are in the process of registering the 2.1 million shares of our common stock issued to the Blue Pumpkin shareholders as part of the purchase price. The registration of these shares requires our filing additional information with the SEC and the subsequent order of the SEC declaring our registration statement effective. We also expect to spend an additional $5.0 million for acquisition and merger-related costs related to the Blue Pumpkin acquisition.
We expect to spend approximately $3.3 million in capital expenditures in 2005 primarily for computer equipment and software. We anticipate that our capital expenditures will increase over the next several years as we expand our facilities and acquire equipment to support the expansion of our research and development activities and internal management information systems.
We believe that our existing cash and investment balances together with our anticipated cash flows from operations will be sufficient to meet our working capital and capital expenditure requirements for at least the next twelve months. In addition, the availability under our line of credit may be used to fund working capital requirements or future merger or acquisition transactions. Our shelf registration statement on Form S-3 (including subsequent amendments) with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") became effective in August 2004. The shelf registration statement allows us to register up to $80 million of securities, which may consist of common stock, warrants to purchase our common stock, or both. The shelf registration statement provides us the ability to raise equity capital if and when appropriate for our business. The sale of additional equity securities could result in additional dilution to our stockholders. If cash generated from operations is insufficient to satisfy our liquidity requirements and we are unable or choose not to raise additional equity capital or borrow under our line of credit, we may seek to establish new financing arrangements. We cannot assure that any financing arrangements will be available in sufficient amounts or on acceptable terms.
Market Risk
Market risk represents the risk of loss that may affect us due to adverse changes in financial market prices and rates. Our market risk exposure primarily relates to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates and interest rates. Except for the hedge transaction entered into in connection with the Eyretel acquisition, we have not entered into derivative or hedging transactions to manage risk in connection with such fluctuations. Due to the relative strength of foreign currencies compared to the U.S. dollar
28
during 2004 and 2003, foreign currency translations contributed $3.4 million and $4.1 million to our December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, cash balances as a result of our subsidiaries' cash denominated in foreign currencies. As of December 31, 2002, foreign currencies impacted cash by $(0.1) million.
Within our foreign-based operations, where transactions may be denominated in foreign currencies, we are subject to market risk with respect to fluctuations in the relative value of currencies. Currently, we have foreign-based operations in Australia, Brazil, Canada, India, Japan, Mexico, and the United Kingdom and conduct transactions in either the local currency of the location or U.S. dollars. We are exposed to adverse movements in foreign currency exchange rates because we translate foreign currencies into U.S. dollars for reporting purposes. Historically, these risks have been minimal, but as our international operations continue to grow, adverse currency fluctuations could have a material adverse impact on our financial results. Cummulative translation adjustment changes resulted in an increase in stockholders' equity of $1.0 million and $4.2 million in 2004 and 2003, respectively. Net foreign exchange gains were $0.3 million, $0.4 million, and $0 million in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
Exposure to market rate risk for changes in interest rates relates to our investment portfolio and any potential borrowing. Our investments are made with capital preservation and liquidity as our primary objectives. We generally hold only high-grade investments such as commercial paper, corporate bonds, auction rate securities and U.S. government agency securities. To reduce our balance sheet exposure to variations in asset values, our investment policy guidelines specify that we invest in the highest investment grade securities and maintain a weighted average maturity of nine months for our entire portfolio. Our investment portfolio may contain securities with maturities of up to three years. While this minimizes our interest rate risk to asset values, our results are exposed to fluctuations in interest income due to changes in market rates.
Contractual Obligations and Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of December 31, 2004, our contractual cash obligations associated with lease obligations, operational restructuring and merger-related costs are as follows (in thousands):
|
Payments Due by Period |
|||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Total |
Less than 1 Year |
2 - 3 Years |
4 - 5 Years |
After 5 Years |
|||||||||||
Operating lease obligations | $ | 23,095 | $ | 5,645 | $ | 8,384 | $ | 2,877 | $ | 6,189 | ||||||
Acquisition-related commitments | 41,193 | 41,193 | | | | |||||||||||
Total | $ | 64,288 | $ | 46,838 | $ | 8,384 | $ | 2,877 | $ | 6,189 | ||||||
As of December 31, 2004, we did not have any other material contractual commitments or any off-balance sheet arrangements.
Transactions with Related Parties
During 2002, notes receivable due from certain officers totaling $0.5 million were satisfied by delivering, at current fair market value, shares of our common stock, which such employees had held for longer than six months. In February 2002, the notes receivable from our CEO totaling $1.8 million were refinanced in part with a full recourse note (the "2002 Note") for approximately $1.5 million with floating monthly interest of 325 basis points over the Federal Funds Rate. The 2002 Note was payable in three equal payments of principal and interest due annually through February 2005. The balance was satisfied in full during 2003 by the CEO delivering at current fair market value, shares of our common stock, which he had held for more than six months. There were no transactions with related parties during 2004.
29
Subsequent Event
On January 24, 2005, we completed the acquisition of Blue Pumpkin Software, Inc. ("Blue Pumpkin"), a privately held California corporation. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement and Plan of Reorganization, dated December 16, 2004 (the "Merger"), we paid an aggregate of $40 million in cash, which was financed from our existing cash and investments, and issued an aggregate of 2.1 million unregistered shares of Witness common stock. On January 31, 2004, we filed a re-sale registration statement on Form S-3 with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") to register those shares. That registration statement is not yet effective. Ten percent of the aggregate merger consideration is being held in escrow for one year after the closing date of the Merger. The escrow period may be extended in the event that there are pending claims that are brought against the escrow fund within such one- year period. The escrow fund is available to compensate Witness, subject to certain limitations, for losses resulting from, among other things, breaches of representations, warranties or covenants in the Merger and certain pending and potential claims.
The Merger is intended to extend our contact center performance optimization capability to include advanced workforce management software and services solutions. The acquisition expands our software and services by adding forecasting, scheduling, adherence and planning applications.
Factors That May Affect Our Future Results and Market Price of Our Stock
Our future operating results may vary substantially from period to period. The price of our common stock will fluctuate in the future, and an investment in our common stock is subject to a variety of risks, including, but not limited to, the specific risks identified below. Inevitably, some investors in our securities will experience gains while others will experience losses depending on the prices at which they purchase and sell our securities. Prospective and existing investors should consider the following factors in evaluating our business or an investment in our securities. If any of the following or other risks actually occurs, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected. In that case, the trading price of our common stock could decline.
Because our products have a long sales cycle, it is difficult to plan our expenses and forecast our results; and our operating results may fail to meet investor expectations, which may adversely affect our stock price.
It typically takes three to nine months from the time we qualify a sales lead until we sign a sales contract with the customer. As a result, it is difficult for us to predict the quarter in which a particular sale will occur. If our sales cycle unexpectedly lengthens for one or more large orders or a significant number of small orders, it would delay the timing of our revenue, but not the timing of most of our corresponding expenses. Lengthening of our sales cycle could also increase the total cost of a sale due to additional employee time and costs associated with the sale. Material changes in our sales cycle could cause our quarterly revenue or operating results to be below the expectations of investors, and the price of our common stock could fall substantially.
Our customers' decision process regarding their purchase of our products and services is relatively long due to several factors, including:
30
If our products and services are not used and accepted by existing and prospective customers, our business and results of operations will be adversely affected.
The market for customer relationship management software, including software that records and analyzes customer interactions and that forecasts and schedules employees, is still developing. Our success depends on the use and acceptance of our software and services by existing and prospective customers. In addition, demand for our software remains uncertain because our existing and potential customers may:
If we experience losses from operations in the future, the market price of our common stock may be materially and adversely affected.
With the exception of 2004 and the first half of 2002, we have historically experienced quarterly losses from operations. We will need to generate sufficient revenue to achieve sustained profitability and avoid incurring losses again in the future. As a result of our prior operating losses, we had an accumulated deficit of $39.0 million as of December 31, 2004.
Our quarterly results are difficult to predict and adverse fluctuations in operating results could cause our stock price to fall.
Our quarterly revenue and operating results are difficult to predict and could fluctuate significantly from period to period. In particular, we typically derive a significant portion of our software product revenue in each quarter from a small number of relatively large orders. The delay or failure to close anticipated sales in a particular quarter could reduce our revenue in that quarter and subsequent quarters over which revenue for the sale could be recognized. In addition, because our revenue from installation and training services largely correlates with our product revenue, a decline in product revenue could also cause a decline in our professional services revenue in the same quarter or in subsequent quarters. Our quarterly revenue is difficult to forecast for several reasons, including the following:
31
As a result of these and other factors, we believe that quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our operating results may not be a good indicator of our future performance, and you should not rely on them to predict our future performance or the performance of our stock price. If our revenue or operating results fall below the expectations of investors or securities analysts, the price of our common stock would likely decline.
We may be unable to manage and expand our international operations, which may adversely affect our business and operating results.
We derived $68.1 million, $48.2 million and $17.1 million in 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively, from customers outside the United States, principally in the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, India, Japan and China. During 2003, we completed the purchase of Eyretel plc and significantly expanded our operations outside of North America. Our operations outside of the United States at December 31, 2004, consisted of 183 dedicated employees located in Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Germany, India, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa and the United Kingdom. We have also established relationships with a number of international resellers.
With our acquisition of Eyretel, which also has sales outside of North America, we have expanded our international operations, and we intend to continue to expand our international operations through additional acquisitions, internal business expansion and strategic business relationships. These efforts require significant management attention and financial resources. We may not be able to successfully penetrate international markets or, if we do, we may not be able to grow or to maintain adequate profit margins in these markets. Because of the complex nature of our international expansion, it may adversely affect our business and operating results. International expansion and sales are subject to many risks, including the following:
32
As we further expand our operations outside the United States, we will also face new competitors and competitive environments. In addition to the risks associated with our domestic competitors, foreign competitors may pose an even greater risk, because they may possess a better understanding of their local markets and have better working relationships with local infrastructure providers and others. In particular, because telephone protocols and standards are unique to each country, local competitors will have more experience with, and may have a competitive advantage in, these markets. We may not be able to obtain similar levels of knowledge, which could place us at a significant competitive disadvantage. In addition, we have limited experience in developing local language versions of our products or in marketing our products to international customers. We may not be able to successfully translate, market, sell, and deliver our products internationally.
If we are unable to maintain a productive direct sales force, our business and operating results could be materially adversely affected.
We believe that our future success will depend on maintaining a productive direct sales force. Historically, it has taken us up to six months to train new sales personnel before they reach an acceptable level of productivity. We have also experienced difficulty in recruiting sales personnel with experience in computer and telephone integration technologies. We cannot assure you that we will be able to continue to manage turnover and hire new sales personnel to meet our needs. If the personnel we hire are less qualified than we expect, it may take us more time to train them before they reach an acceptable level of productivity, which could increase our costs and impact our revenue.
If we are unable to expand the distribution of our products through indirect sales channels, our business and operating results could be materially adversely affected.
Our strategy is to continue to increase the proportion of customers served through indirect sales channels, such as select resellers and a variety of strategic marketing alliances. Product revenue from our indirect sales channel represented approximately 32% and 31% of total product revenue in 2004 and 2003. We expect revenue from our indirect sales channel and, accordingly, our dependence on distribution partners, to increase as we establish relationships with companies to resell our software worldwide. In connection with our acquisition of Blue Pumpkin, we acquired several reseller relationships with provisions that grant exclusive rights to market some of our products. If we are not successful in removing these contractual provisions, our ability to grow in the affected geographies, including the United Kingdom, may be limited. We cannot assure you that we will be able to maintain productive relationships with our current partners, or that we will be able to establish similar relationships with additional resellers on a timely basis, if at all.
Some resellers with which we do business have similar, and often more established, relationships with our competitors, and may recommend the products and services of our competitors to customers instead of our software and services. We cannot provide assurance that these distribution partners will devote adequate resources to selling our software and services or that our resellers may not learn about our products and the market for our software and services and develop and sell competing products and services. As a result, our relationships with resellers could lead to increased competition for us.
Intense competition in our business could adversely affect our revenue, profitability and market share.
The market for products that record customer interactions, analyze performance and/or provide electronic learning is intensely competitive, evolving and is subject to rapid changes in technology. We believe our principal competitors include, but are not limited to:
33
Many of our current and potential competitors have longer operating histories, more established business relationships, larger customer bases, a broader range of products and services, greater name recognition and substantially greater financial, technical, marketing, personnel, management, service, support and other resources than we do. As a result, our current and potential competitors may be able to respond more quickly to new or emerging technologies and changes in customer requirements, take better advantage of acquisitions and other opportunities, devote greater resources to marketing and selling their products and services and adopt more aggressive pricing policies. We cannot assure you that our current or potential competitors will not develop products comparable or superior in terms of price and performance features to those developed by us.
In addition, many of our competitors market their products through resellers and companies that integrate their technology and products with those of the competitor. These resellers and technology partners often have strong business relationships with our customers and potential customers. For example, some of our competitors have better and more long standing relationships than we do with telephone switch vendors. Our competitors may use these business relationships to market and sell their products and compete for potential customers. It is also possible that resellers or technology partners may acquire or be acquired by one or more of our competitors, which would further solidify their business relationships.
We expect that competition will increase as other established and emerging companies enter our market and as new products, services and technologies are introduced. Increased competition may result in price reductions, lower gross margins and loss of market share, any of which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our heavy reliance on sales of our eQuality Balance, eQuality Evaluation and eQuality ContactStore products exposes us to risks of obsolescence due to changes in competitive product offerings.
We continue to derive a substantial portion of our product revenues from sales of our eQuality Balance, eQuality Evaluation and eQuality ContactStore software. We expect revenue from these products to continue to account for most of our revenue for the foreseeable future. As a result, any factors affecting the markets for these products, could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. We cannot assure you that the market will continue to demand our current products or that we will be successful in marketing any new or enhanced products. If our competitors release new products that are superior to our products in performance or price, demand for our products may decline. A decline in demand for our products as a result of competition, technological change or other factors would reduce our total revenues and harm our ability to maintain profitability.
If we fail to develop new software or improve our existing software, we may not be able to remain competitive.
The markets for our products are characterized by rapidly changing technology, frequent new product introductions and enhancements, changes in customer demands and evolving industry
34
standards. Our existing products could be rendered obsolete if we fail to continue to advance our technology. We have also found that the technological life cycles of our products are difficult to estimate, partially because of changing demands of our customers. We believe that our future success will depend on our ability to continue to enhance our current product line while we concurrently develop and introduce new products that keep pace with competitive and technological developments. These developments require us to continue to make substantial product development investments. Although we are presently developing a number of product enhancements to our product suites, we cannot assure you that these enhancements will be completed on a timely basis or gain customer acceptance. In addition, failure to develop new software or improve existing software products may impact our ability to maintain our maintenance renewal rate which could have a material impact on our revenue.
If our software development activities in the Asia-Pacific region are not successful, we may not be able to meet our development schedules.
During 2004, we significantly expanded our software development capabilities in the Asia-Pacific region in order to optimize available research and development resources and better meet development timeframes. We have limited experience with remote software development activities. Accordingly, there are a number of risks associated with this activity, including:
Our inability to meet development schedules because of our reliance on developers in the Asia-Pacific region may affect our ability to enhance our current product line or introduce new products, which would have a material adverse affect on our financial results and could harm our reputation. The loss of key development personnel could have a material adverse effect on our product development process and adversely affect future product revenues.
Our liability to customers may be substantial if our products fail to perform properly.
Our software is used in a complex operating environment that requires its integration with computer and telephone networks and other business software applications. If our products fail to function as required, we may be subject to claims for substantial damages. Courts may not enforce provisions in our contracts that would limit our liability or otherwise protect us from liability for damages. Although we maintain general liability insurance coverage, including coverage for errors or omissions, this coverage may not continue to be available on reasonable terms or in sufficient amounts to cover claims against us. In addition, our insurer may disclaim coverage as to any future claim. If claims exceeding the available insurance coverage are successfully asserted against us, or our insurer imposes premium increases, large deductibles or co-insurance requirements on us, our business and results of operations could be adversely affected.
Our software may contain undetected errors or "bugs," resulting in harm to our reputation and operating results.
Software products as complex as those offered by us might contain undetected errors or failures when first introduced or when new versions are released. We cannot assure you, despite testing by us
35
and by current and prospective customers, that errors will not be found in new products or product enhancements after commercial release. Any errors found may cause substantial harm to our reputation and result in additional unplanned expenses to remedy any defects as well as a loss in revenue.
If our advanced compliance recording applications fail to record 100% of our customers' interactions, we may be subject to liability and our reputation may be harmed.
Through our acquisition of Eyretel, we have extended our product line to include advanced compliance recording applications and related services. Many of our Eyretel customers use these applications to record and store interactions with customers to provide back-up and verification of transactions and to guard against risks posed by lost or misinterpreted voice communications. These customers rely on our applications to record, store and retrieve voice data in a timely, reliable and efficient manner. If our applications fail to record 100% of our customers' interactions or our customers are unable to retrieve the recordings when necessary, we may be subject to liability and our reputation may be harmed.
If we are unable to maintain the security of our systems, our business, financial condition and operating results could be harmed.
The occurrence or perception of security breaches in the operation of our business or by third parties using our products could harm our business, financial condition and operating results. Our customers use our products to compile and analyze highly sensitive or confidential information. We may come into contact with such information or data when we perform support or maintenance functions for our customers. While we have internal policies and procedures for employees performing these functions, the perception that we have improperly handled sensitive, confidential information could have a negative effect on our business. If, in handling this information, we fail to comply with privacy or security laws, we could incur civil liability to government agencies, customers and individuals whose privacy is compromised. If personal information is received or used from sources outside the U.S., we could be subject to civil, administrative or criminal liability under the laws of other countries. In addition, while we implement sophisticated security measures, third parties may attempt to breach our security or inappropriately use our products through computer viruses, electronic break-ins and other disruptions. If successful, confidential information may be improperly obtained and we may be subject to lawsuits and other liability. Any internal or external security breaches could harm our reputation, and even the perception of security risks, whether or not valid, could inhibit market acceptance of our products.
Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates could affect our financial results.
We may experience gains and losses resulting from fluctuations in currency exchange rates. Moreover, in locations where we price our products in U.S. dollars, our sales could be affected adversely by declines in foreign currencies relative to the dollar, thereby making our products more expensive in local currencies. In locations, where we sell our products in local currencies, we could be competitively unable to increase our prices to reflect fluctuations in exchange rates. We cannot predict the impact that future exchange rate fluctuations may have on our results.
Certain provisions in agreements that we have entered into may expose us to liability for breach that is not limited in amount by the terms of the contract.
Certain contract provisions, principally confidentiality and indemnification obligations in certain of our license agreements, could expose us to risks of loss that, in some cases, are not limited by contract to a specified maximum amount. If we fail to perform to the standards required by these contracts, we could be subject to additional liability and our business, financial condition and results of operations
36
could be materially and adversely affected. There have been no material losses to date as a result of any such contractual provisions.
If we fail to protect our intellectual property, third parties may use our technology for their own benefit.
Our success and ability to compete depends to a significant degree upon our proprietary technology. We rely on a combination of patent, trade secret, copyright and trademark laws and confidentiality agreements with employees and third parties to establish and protect our proprietary rights. These measures may not be sufficient to protect our proprietary rights, and we cannot be certain that third parties will not misappropriate our technology and use it for their own benefit. Also, most of these protections do not preclude our competitors from independently developing products with functionality or features substantially equivalent or superior to our software. Any infringement of our proprietary rights could negatively impact our future operating results.
As of December 31, 2004, we had seven registered trademarks, one trademark application pending in the U.S., five U.S. and three international patents, and 15 patent applications pending in the U.S. and five patent applications pending internationally. There is no guarantee that our pending applications will result in issued trademarks or patents or, if issued, that they will provide us with any competitive advantage. We cannot assure you that we will file further patent or trademark applications, that any future applications will be approved, that any existing or future patents, trademarks or copyrights will adequately protect our intellectual property or that any existing or future patents, trademarks or copyrights will not be challenged by third parties.
We are aware of certain uses, U.S. trademark registrations, and U.S. trademark applications for our "eQuality" trademark and its variations that predate our use, and the April 2002 issuance of the U.S. registration for our trademark eQuality®. It is possible that an owner of legal rights resulting from prior use, registrations, or applications will bring legal action to challenge our registration of and/or our use of the trademark eQuality®, and may also seek compensation for damages resulting from our use this trademark. As a result, we cannot assure you that our registration of this trademark will be undisturbed, or that this use will not result in liability for trademark infringement, trademark dilution, and/or unfair competition.
Moreover, the laws of certain foreign countries do not protect our intellectual property rights to the same extent, as do the laws of the United States. Furthermore, policing the unauthorized use of our products is difficult, and litigation may be necessary in the future to enforce our intellectual property rights, to protect our trade secrets or to determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of others. Litigation could result in substantial costs and diversion of resources and could negatively impact our future operating results.
Claims by other companies that our software infringes their intellectual property could require us to incur substantial costs or prevent us from selling our software or services.
It is possible that third parties will claim that we have infringed their current or future products. We expect that we and other participants in our industry will be increasingly subject to infringement claims as the number of competitors and products grows. Any claims, with or without merit, which is generally uninsurable could be time-consuming, result in costly litigation, require us to reengineer or redevelop our software, cause product shipment delays or require us to enter into royalty or licensing agreements, any of which could negatively impact our operating results. Any efforts to reengineer our software or obtain licenses from third parties may not be successful, could be extremely costly and would likely divert valuable management and product development resources. For example, depending on the outcome of lawsuits involving Knowlagent and NICE (as described in Note 14, "Legal Proceedings" of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements), we may be required to enter into
37
royalty and licensing agreements on unfavorable terms, to stop selling or redesign our products at issue, or to pay damages or satisfy indemnification commitments with our customers.
In addition, we cannot assure you that legal action claiming patent infringement will not be commenced against us, or that we would prevail in litigation given the complex technical issues and inherent uncertainties in patent litigation. In addition, users of our software may become subject to claims if our software is alleged to infringe the intellectual property of others. These software users could attempt to hold us responsible for these claims and any resulting harm they suffer. If a patent claim against us was successful and we could not obtain a license on acceptable terms or license a substitute technology or redesign to avoid infringement, we may be prevented from distributing our software or required to incur significant expense and delay in developing non-infringing software. Such a result would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
As a result of our acquisition of Blue Pumpkin, we are subject to pending patent and employment lawsuits, which, if determined adversely to us, may cause our business to suffer.
In January 2001, IEX Corporation filed a lawsuit against Blue Pumpkin in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division, alleging that Blue Pumpkin infringed IEX Corporation's ("IEX") U.S. Patent No. 6,044,355 (the "355 Patent") by making and selling certain workforce management and call routing software products, including Blue Pumpkin's Prime Time Skills and Prime Time Enterprise products. IEX is seeking to recover actual damages, an award of treble damages pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 284, and an award of prejudgment interest, costs, and attorney's fees. IEX is also seeking an injunction against Blue Pumpkin's making or selling the products that IEX claims infringe its "355 Patent. On October 10, 2003, the District Court granted Blue Pumpkin summary judgment of non-infringement. That day, the District Court dismissed the remainder of the case. IEX appealed the District Court's summary judgment ruling to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. On February 2, 2005, the Federal Circuit reversed-in-part the district court's summary judgment ruling and remanded the action to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the Federal Circuit's analysis. Blue Pumpkin is not yet on a schedule before the district court. We are unable to assess the impact, if any, on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In addition, Steven Osborn, a former salesman for Blue Pumpkin, filed a complaint against Blue Pumpkin in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas alleging fraudulent and negligent misrepresentation, breach of contract, quantum meruit, and unjust enrichment, relating to the amount of commissions he earned on a contract he effectuated for Blue Pumpkin. Blue Pumpkin has filed for summary judgment and the motion is currently pending. We cannot predict with certainty the outcome of this litigation at this time.
Regardless of the merit of these claims, they can be time-consuming and costly. While we currently believe that the ultimate outcome of these proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations, litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties. If an unfavorable ruling were to occur, there exists the remote possibility of a material adverse impact on our net income. Our estimate of the potential impact from these legal proceedings on our financial position or results of operations could change in the future.
If we are unable to maintain the compatibility of our software with certain other products and technologies, our future business would be adversely affected.
Our software must integrate with software and hardware solutions provided by a number of our existing and potential competitors. For example, our products must integrate with phone switches made by the telephone switch vendors and computer telephony software applications offered by other
38
software providers. These competitors or their business partners could alter their products so that our software no longer integrates well with them, or they could delay or deny our access to software releases that allow us to timely adapt our software to integrate with their products. If we cannot adapt our software to changes in necessary technology, it may significantly impair our ability to compete effectively, particularly if our software must integrate with the software and hardware solutions of our competitors.
If our professional services employees do not provide installation services effectively and efficiently, our customers may not use our installation services or may stop using our software.
Our customers ordinarily purchase installation, training and maintenance services together with our products. The functionality of our products are not dependent on our installation and training services. We generate a material part of our revenues from these services. We believe that the speed and quality of installation services are competitive factors in our industry. If our installation services are not satisfactory to our customers, the customers may choose not to use our installation services or they may not license our software in the future. As a result, we would lose licensing and services revenue, and it could harm our reputation.
We may make acquisitions or investments that are not successful and that adversely affect our ongoing operations.
We may acquire or make investments in companies, products, services and technologies that we believe complement our business and assist us in quickly bringing new products to market. We have limited experience in making acquisitions and investments. As a result, our ability to identify and evaluate prospects, complete acquisitions and properly manage the integration of businesses is relatively unproven. If we fail to properly evaluate and execute acquisitions or investments, it may have a material adverse effect on our business and operating results. In making or attempting to make acquisitions or investments, we face a number of risks, including:
39
If we need additional financing to maintain or expand our business, it may not be available on favorable terms, if at all.
Although we believe our current cash and borrowing capacity will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash needs for at least the next 12 months and the foreseeable future, we may need additional funds to expand or meet all of our operating needs. If we need additional financing, we cannot be certain that it will be available to us on favorable terms, or at all. If we raise additional funds by issuing equity securities or convertible debt, the ownership interest of our stockholders could be significantly diluted, and any additional equity securities we issue may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to the rights of our stockholders. Also, the terms of any additional financing we obtain may significantly limit our future financing and operating activities. If we need funds and cannot obtain them on acceptable terms, we may be unable to:
Any of these events could significantly harm our business and financial condition and limit our growth.
The loss of third-party hardware suppliers could harm our business.
A number of customers expect us to source hardware to support the implementation of our software. We are working towards reducing the amount of hardware sales in the future and have transferred the fulfillment of hardware orders to third-party distributors. Thus, we are largely dependent on third parties for the supply of hardware components to our customers. If these hardware distributors experience financial, operational or quality assurance difficulties, or if there is any other disruption in our relationships, we may be required to locate alternative hardware sources. We are subject to the following risks due to our hardware distribution system:
Even if we and/or our distributors are successful in locating alternative sources of supply, alternative suppliers could increase prices significantly. In addition, alternative components may malfunction or interact with existing components in unexpected ways. The use of new suppliers and the modification of our products to function with new systems would require testing and may require further modifications, which may result in additional expense, diversion of management attention and other resources, inability to fulfill customer orders or delay in fulfillment, reduction in quality and reliability, customer dissatisfaction, and other adverse effects on our reputation, business and operating results.
Failure to achieve and maintain effective internal controls in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and stock price.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 imposes new duties on us and our executives, directors, attorneys and independent registered public accountants. Our efforts to comply with the requirements of Section 404 have resulted in increased general and administrative expense and a diversion of management time and attention from revenue-generating activities to compliance activities, and we
40
expect these efforts to require the continued commitment of significant resources. If we fail to maintain the adequacy of our internal controls, as such standards are modified, supplemented or amended from time to time, we may not be able to ensure that we can conclude on an ongoing basis that we have effective internal controls over financial reporting. Failure to achieve and maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting could result in investigation and/or sanctions by regulatory authorities, and could have a material adverse effect on our business and operating results, investor confidence in our reported financial information, and the market price of our common stock.
Our stock price has been volatile.
The market price of our common stock has been subject to significant fluctuations in response to variations in quarterly operating results and other factors. In addition, the stock market has experienced significant volatility that has particularly affected the market prices of equity securities of many technology companies and that often has been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of these companies. Any announcement with respect to any adverse variance in revenue or earnings from levels generally expected by securities analysts or investors could have a significant adverse effect on the trading price of our common stock. In addition, factors such as announcements of technological innovations or new products by us, our competitors or third parties, changing conditions in the customer relationship management software market, changes in the market valuations of similar companies, loss of a major customer, additions or departures of key personnel, changes in estimates by securities analysts, announcements of extraordinary events, such as acquisitions or litigation, or general economic conditions may have an adverse effect on the market price of our common stock.
We issued 2.1 million new shares and granted approximately 800,000 options to purchase shares of our common stock, which will result in dilution to our existing stockholders and may cause our stock price to decline.
As part of the merger consideration in our recent acquisition of Blue Pumpkin, we issued a total of 2.1 million shares of common stock to Blue Pumpkin shareholders, which increased our total outstanding common stock by approximately 8%; we also issued options to purchase approximately 800,000 shares of common stock in connection with the acquisition. The issuance of a significant amount of additional shares of common stock results in dilution to our existing shareholders and reduces our earnings per share, which could negatively affect the market price of our common stock. A significant amount of common stock coming on the market at any given time could result in a decline in the price of our common stock or increased volatility.
Our performance may be negatively affected by macro-economic or other external influences.
Beginning in 2000, a declining United States economy began to adversely affect the performance of many businesses, especially within the technology sector. We are a technology company selling technology-based solutions with total pricing, including software and services that in some cases exceed $1.0 million. Reductions in the capital budgets of our customers and prospective customers had an adverse impact on our ability to sell our solutions. Until late in 2003, we continued to experience effects from a weak spending environment for information technology in both the United States and Europe, in the form of delayed and cancelled buying decisions by customers for our software, services and hardware, deferrals by customers of service engagements previously scheduled and pressure by our customers and competitors to discount our offerings. If the current improvements now being seen in the general business climate do not continue, this would likely have a material adverse effect on our business.
41
Government regulation of telephone and Internet monitoring could cause a decline in the use of our software, result in increased expenses for us or subject our customers and us to liability.
As the telecommunications industry continues to evolve, state, federal and foreign governments (including supranational governmental organizations such as the European Union) may increasingly regulate the monitoring of telecommunications and telephone and Internet monitoring and recording products, such as our software. We believe that increases in regulation could come in the form of a number of different kinds of regulations, including regulations regarding privacy, protection of personal information and employment. For example, the State of California recently enacted the Database Security Breach Act, which requires any business that suffers a computer security breach to immediately notify customers in California if personal information has been compromised. The adoption of any new regulations or changes to existing regulations could cause a decline in the use of our software and could result in increased expense for us, particularly if we are required to modify our software to accommodate these regulations. Moreover, these regulations could subject our customers or us to liability. Whether or not these regulations are adopted, if we do not adequately address the privacy concerns of consumers, companies may be hesitant to use our software. If any of these events occur, it could materially and adversely affect our business.
If we are unable to attract and retain key personnel, our ability to effectively manage and grow our business would suffer.
Our success greatly depends on our ability to hire, train, retain and motivate qualified personnel, particularly in sales, marketing, research and development, service and support. We face significant competition for individuals with the skills required to perform the services we offer. If we are unable to attract and retain qualified personnel or if we experience high personnel turnover, it could prevent us from effectively managing and expanding our business.
Our success also depends upon the continued service of our executive officers, particularly our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, David Gould, and our President and Chief Operating Officer, Nick Discombe. We have employment agreements with Mr. Gould and Mr. Discombe and limited non-compete agreements with most of our other executive officers. However, any of our executive officers and other employees could terminate his or her relationship with us at any time. The loss of the services of our executive officers or other key personnel, particularly if lost to competitors, could materially and adversely affect our business.
Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws, as well as Delaware law, may inhibit a takeover of our company, which could limit the price investors might be willing to pay for our securities.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws, as well as Delaware law, contain provisions that might enable our management to resist a takeover of our company. For example, our stockholders cannot take action by written consent or call a special meeting to remove our board of directors. In addition, our directors serve for staggered terms, which makes it difficult to remove all our directors at once. Further, in October 2002, our board of directors approved, and we have implemented, a stockholder rights plan which has the effect of causing substantial dilution to a person or group that attempts to acquire us on terms not approved by the board of directors.
These anti-takeover provisions might discourage, delay or prevent a change in the control of our company or a change in our management. These provisions could also discourage proxy contests and make it more difficult for you and other shareholders to elect directors and take other corporate actions. The existence of these provisions could also limit the price that investors might be willing to pay in the future for our securities.
42
Item 7A. Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The information required by this item is included in the Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and as listed in Item 7 of Part II of this Report.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Our consolidated financial statements, together with related notes and the reports of KPMG LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, are set forth on the pages indicated in Item 15.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures
None.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. We maintain disclosure controls and procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the periodic reports we file with the SEC is recorded, processed, summarized and reported accurately and within the time periods specified in the rules of the SEC. We carried out an evaluation as of December 31, 2004, under the supervision and the participation of our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, of the design and operation of these disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(c). Based upon that evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information relating to the company (including our consolidated subsidiaries) required to be included in our periodic SEC filings.
Changes in Internal Controls. There was no change in internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the three months ended December 31, 2004 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. See Part IV, Item 15 page F-2 and F-3 for management's report and the independent registered public accounting firm's report on internal control over financial reporting.
43
Certain information required by Part III is omitted from this Report in that the Company will file a definitive proxy statement within 120 days after the end of this fiscal year pursuant to Regulation 14A (the "Proxy Statement") for its 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders proposed to be held on May 18, 2005, and the information included therein is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of Registrant
Code of Ethics
We have adopted a Code of Ethics within the meaning of Item 406(b) of Regulation S-K. This Code of Ethics applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer. This Code of Ethics is publicly available on our website at http://www.witness.com. If we make substantive amendments to this Code of Ethics or grant any waiver, including any implicit waiver, we will disclose the nature of such amendment or waiver on our website or in a report on Form 8-K within four business days of such amendment or waiver.
Audit Committee Financial Expert
Our Board of Directors has determined that at least one person serving on the Audit Committee is an "audit committee financial expert" as defined under Item 401(h) of Regulation S-K. Joel Katz, the Chairman of the Audit Committee, is an "audit committee financial expert" and is independent as defined under applicable SEC and Nasdaq rules.
The other information required by this Item is incorporated by reference from the Proxy Statement under the headings "Election of Directors" and "Executive Compensation."
Item 11. Executive Compensation
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference from the Proxy Statement under the heading "Executive Compensation."
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference from the Proxy Statement under the heading "Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters."
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference from the Proxy Statement under the heading "Executive Compensation."
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference from the Proxy Statement under the heading "Audit Fees and Services."
44
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
|
|
Page |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
1. | Financial Statements | |||
Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting |
F-2 |
|||
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control over Financial Reporting | F-3 | |||
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Consolidated Financial Statements | F-5 | |||
Consolidated Balance Sheets | F-6 | |||
Consolidated Statements of Operations | F-7 | |||
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity | F-8 | |||
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows | F-9 | |||
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | F-10 | |||
2. |
Financial Statement Schedule |
|||
Schedule IIValuation and Qualifying Accounts |
F-33 |
|||
3. |
Signatures |
F-34 |
Exhibit Number |
Description |
|
---|---|---|
2.1(13) | Merger Agreement and Plan of Reorganization by and among Witness Systems, Inc., Baron Acquisition Corporation, Blue Pumpkin Software, Inc., and, solely with respect to Article VIII and Article IX, Laurence R. Hootnick as Shareholder Agent and The U.S. Stock Transfer Corporation as Depository Agent dated December 16, 2004 | |
3.1(2) | Fifth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company | |
3.2(1) | Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company | |
3.3(8) | Form of Certificate of Designation for Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock | |
4.1(2) | See Exhibit 3.1 for provisions of the Fifth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company defining rights of the holders of Common Stock of the Company. | |
4.2(4) | See Exhibit 3.2 for provisions of the Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company defining rights of the holders of Common Stock of the Company. | |
4.3(1) | Specimen Stock Certificate | |
4.4(8) | Form of Rights Agreement, dated October 25, 2002, between the Company and SunTrust Bank which includes the form of Certificate of Designation for the Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock as Exhibit A, the form of Rights Certificate as Exhibit B and the Summary of Rights to Purchase Preferred Stock as Exhibit C | |
10.1(3) | Lease Agreement between the Company and Colonial Center at Mansell Overlook/Colonial Business Center dated July 28, 2000 | |
10.2(10) | Lease Agreement between Eyretel plc and Cornhill Insurance plc at Kings Court dated December 24, 1999 | |
45
10.3* | Lease Agreement between the Company and Mission Towers, LLC at Freedom Circle Drive dated February 18, 2005 | |
10.4(1) | Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan of the Company | |
10.5(2) | Amendment No. 1 to the Company's Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan | |
10.6(10) | Amendment No. 2 to the Company's Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan | |
10.7(5) | Form of Stock Option Grant Certificate. | |
10.8(4) | Employee Stock Purchase Plan of the Company | |
10.9(9) | 2003 Broad Based Option Plan of the Company | |
10.10(9) | 2003 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan | |
10.11(10) | Director and Key Executive Stock Ownership Incentive Policy | |
10.12* | Form of Inducement Grant for Employees of Blue Pumpkin | |
10.13(1) | Employment Agreement entered into between David B. Gould and the Company effective February 2, 1999 | |
10.14(1) | Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement entered into between David B. Gould and the Company, dated as of August 2, 1999 | |
10.15(1) | Restricted Stock Award Agreement dated March 31, 1999, between the Company and David Gould | |
10.16(10) | Employment Agreement entered into between Nicholas S. Discombe and the Company, dated as of June 29, 2003 | |
10.17(1) | Form of Indemnification Agreement for executive officers and directors of the Company | |
10.18(12) | Form of Change of Control Agreement entered into with certain senior officers of the company | |
10.19(1) | Subsidiary License and Distribution Agreement | |
10.20(6) | Loan and Security Agreement between the Company and Silicon Valley Bank dated April 3, 2002 | |
10.21(6) | Loan Modification Agreement between the Company and Silicon Valley Bank dated November 12, 2002 | |
10.22(6) | Revolving Promissory Note between the Company and Silicon Valley Bank dated November 12, 2002 | |
10.23(10) | Second Loan Modification Agreement between the Company and Silicon Valley Bank dated May 14, 2003 | |
10.24(10) | Third Loan Modification Agreement between the Company and Silicon Valley Bank dated November 13, 2003 | |
10.25(11) | Fourth Loan Modification Agreement between the Company and Silicon Valley Bank dated January 8, 2004 | |
10.26(11) | Fifth Loan Modification Agreement between the Company and Silicon Valley Bank dated March 10, 2004 | |
10.27* | Sixth Loan Modification Agreement between the Company and Silicon Valley Bank dated January 12, 2005 | |
21.1* | List of subsidiaries | |
46
23.1* | Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Consolidated Financial Statement Schedule | |
23.2* | Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | |
23.3* | Consent of Independent Business Valuation Experts | |
31.1* | Certificate of the Chief Executive Officer | |
31.2* | Certificate of the Chief Financial Officer | |
32.1* | Certifications Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
*Filed herewith
47
WITNESS SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
Page |
|
---|---|---|
Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting |
F-2 |
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control over Financial Reporting |
F-3 |
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Consolidated Financial Statements |
F-5 |
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 |
F-6 |
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002 |
F-7 |
|
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002 |
F-8 |
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002 |
F-9 |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
F-10 |
|
Schedule IIValuation and Qualifying Accounts |
F-33 |
|
Signatures |
F-34 |
F-1
Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
The management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Company maintains accounting and internal control systems which are intended to provide reasonable assurance that assets are safeguarded against loss from unauthorized use or disposition, transactions are executed in accordance with management's authorization and accounting records are reliable for preparing financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
Internal control over financial reporting cannot provide absolute assurance of achieving financial reporting objectives because of its inherent limitations. Internal control over financial reporting is a process that involves human diligence and compliance and is subject to lapses in judgment and breakdowns resulting from human failures. Internal control over financial reporting also can be circumvented by collusion or improper management override. Because of such limitations, there is a risk that material misstatements may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by internal control over financial reporting. However, these inherent limitations are known features of the financial reporting process. Therefore, it is possible to design into the process safeguards to reduce, though not eliminate, this risk.
The Company's management assessed the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004. In making this assessment, the Company's management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework. Based on our assessment, management believes that, as of December 31, 2004, the Company's internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria.
Management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 has been audited by KPMG LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm who also audited the Company's consolidated financial statements. Their report appears immediately after this report.
Witness
Systems, Inc.
March 15, 2005
F-2
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
The
Board of Directors
Witness Systems, Inc.:
We have audited management's assessment, included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, that Witness Systems, Inc. maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Witness Systems, Inc.'s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assessment, and an opinion on the effectiveness of the company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management's assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, management's assessment that Witness Systems, Inc. maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Also, in our opinion, Witness Systems, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
F-3
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Witness Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004 and our report dated March 15, 2005 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Atlanta,
Georgia
March 15, 2005
F-4
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Consolidated Financial Statements
The
Board of Directors
Witness Systems, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Witness Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Witness Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of Witness Systems, Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated March 15, 2005 expressed an unqualified opinion on management's assessment of, and the effective operation of, internal control over financial reporting.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Atlanta,
Georgia
March 15, 2005
F-5
WITNESS SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share data)
|
December 31, |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||
ASSETS | |||||||||
Current assets: | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 42,641 | $ | 21,517 | |||||
Investments | 33,842 | 19,355 | |||||||
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $3,250 at December 31, 2004 | |||||||||
and $2,840 at December 31, 2003 | 25,681 | 31,451 | |||||||
Prepaid and other current assets | 4,118 | 3,311 | |||||||
Total current assets | 106,282 | 75,634 | |||||||
Intangible assets, net | 10,802 | 20,083 | |||||||
Property and equipment, net | 6,197 | 6,141 | |||||||
Other assets | 1,218 | 2,177 | |||||||
$ | 124,499 | $ | 104,035 | ||||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY |
|||||||||
Current liabilities: | |||||||||
Accounts payable | $ | 4,454 | $ | 3,648 | |||||
Accrued expenses | 16,308 | 22,368 | |||||||
Deferred revenue | 25,406 | 20,921 | |||||||
Total current liabilities | 46,168 | 46,937 | |||||||
Other long-term liabilities | 3,703 | 3,906 | |||||||
Deferred income tax liabilities | 254 | 3,197 | |||||||
Total liabilities | 50,125 | 54,040 | |||||||
Stockholders' equity: | |||||||||
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; (50,000 shares of which have been designated as Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock), no shares issued or outstanding | | | |||||||
Common stock, $.01 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized; 24,476,289 and 22,169,672 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively | 245 | 222 | |||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 108,247 | 94,293 | |||||||
Accumulated deficit | (39,060 | ) | (48,506 | ) | |||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income | 4,942 | 3,986 | |||||||
Total stockholders' equity | 74,374 | 49,995 | |||||||
$ | 124,499 | $ | 104,035 | ||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-6
WITNESS SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||||
Revenue: | ||||||||||||
Product | $ | 57,620 | $ | 46,238 | $ | 33,383 | ||||||
Services | 83,715 | 61,799 | 34,303 | |||||||||
Total revenue | 141,335 | 108,037 | 67,686 | |||||||||
Cost of revenue: | ||||||||||||
Product | 13,784 | 11,580 | 1,132 | |||||||||
Services | 32,594 | 24,278 | 12,286 | |||||||||
Total cost of revenue | 46,378 | 35,858 | 13,418 | |||||||||
Gross profit | 94,957 | 72,179 | 54,268 | |||||||||
Operating expenses: | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative | 65,051 | 60,003 | 40,439 | |||||||||
Research and development | 20,856 | 18,036 | 15,090 | |||||||||
Merger-related costs | 498 | 7,865 | | |||||||||
Acquired in-process research and development | | 7,840 | | |||||||||
Operating income (loss) | 8,552 | (21,565 | ) | (1,261 | ) | |||||||
Interest and other income, net | 1,206 | 1,303 | 1,570 | |||||||||
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes | 9,758 | (20,262 | ) | 309 | ||||||||
Provision for income taxes | 312 | 307 | 261 | |||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 9,446 | $ | (20,569 | ) | $ | 48 | |||||
Net income (loss) per share: | ||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.40 | $ | (0.94 | ) | $ | 0.00 | |||||
Diluted | $ | 0.36 | $ | (0.94 | ) | $ | 0.00 | |||||
Weighted-average common shares outstanding: | ||||||||||||
Basic | 23,361 | 21,991 | 22,626 | |||||||||
Diluted | 26,084 | 21,991 | 23,524 | |||||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-7
WITNESS SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY AND
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(In thousands)
|
Common Stock |
|
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
|
|||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Additional Paid-In Capital |
Accumulated Deficit |
Notes Receivable for Stock |
Total Stockholders' Equity |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Number |
Amount |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2001 | 22,479 | $ | 225 | $ | 96,224 | $ | (27,985 | ) | $ | (2,322 | ) | $ | (88 | ) | $ | 66,054 | |||||||
Exercise of stock options and warrants | 378 | 4 | 985 | | | | 989 | ||||||||||||||||
Shares issued under employee stock purchase plan | 85 | 1 | 369 | | | | 370 | ||||||||||||||||
Repayment of notes receivable for stock and related interest receivable | (66 | ) | (1 | ) | (871 | ) | | 852 | | (20 | ) | ||||||||||||
Stock repurchases | (840 | ) | (9 | ) | (2,447 | ) | | | | (2,456 | ) | ||||||||||||
Comprehensive loss: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in cummulative foreign currency translation adjustment | | | | | | (35 | ) | (35 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments, net | | | | | | 124 | 124 | ||||||||||||||||
Net income | | | | 48 | | | 48 | ||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income | 137 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2002 | 22,036 | 220 | 94,260 | (27,937 | ) | (1,470 | ) | 1 | 65,074 | ||||||||||||||
Exercise of stock options | 285 | 3 | 1,102 | | | | 1,105 | ||||||||||||||||
Shares issued under employee stock purchase plan | 162 | 2 | 557 | | | | 559 | ||||||||||||||||
Repayment of notes receivable for stock | (108 | ) | (1 | ) | (985 | ) | 1,470 | 484 | |||||||||||||||
Stock repurchases | (205 | ) | (2 | ) | (641 | ) | | | | (643 | ) | ||||||||||||
Comprehensive income: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in cummulative foreign currency translation adjustment | | | | | | 4,158 | 4,158 | ||||||||||||||||
Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments, net | | | | | | (173 | ) | (173 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net loss | | | | (20,569 | ) | | | (20,569 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive loss | (16,584 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2003 | 22,170 | 222 | 94,293 | (48,506 | ) | | 3,986 | 49,995 | |||||||||||||||
Exercise of stock options | 2,224 | 22 | 13,052 | | | | 13,074 | ||||||||||||||||
Tax benefit on exercised stock options | | | 214 | | | | 214 | ||||||||||||||||
Shares issued under employee stock purchase plan | 82 | 1 | 688 | | | | 689 | ||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in cummulative foreign currency translation adjustment | | | | | | 959 | 959 | ||||||||||||||||
Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments, net | | | | | | (3 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net income | | | | 9,446 | | | 9,446 | ||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income | 10,402 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2004 | 24,476 | $ | 245 | $ | 108,247 | $ | (39,060 | ) | $ | | $ | 4,942 | $ | 74,374 | |||||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-8
WITNESS SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: | ||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 9,446 | $ | (20,569 | ) | $ | 48 | |||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities: | ||||||||||||||
In-process research and development | | 7,840 | | |||||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets | 5,911 | 5,913 | 401 | |||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment | 3,175 | 3,805 | 3,212 | |||||||||||
Provision for doubtful accounts and sales allowances | 1,908 | 3,047 | 908 | |||||||||||
Other non-cash items, net | 901 | 275 | 403 | |||||||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | ||||||||||||||
Accounts receivable | 5,068 | (7,212 | ) | (92 | ) | |||||||||
Prepaid and other assets | (3,043 | ) | 3,146 | 52 | ||||||||||
Accounts payable | (92 | ) | (2,875 | ) | (194 | ) | ||||||||
Accrued expenses | (4,459 | ) | (2,728 | ) | 96 | |||||||||
Deferred revenue | 3,978 | 5,295 | 4,064 | |||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | 22,793 | (4,063 | ) | 8,898 | ||||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: | ||||||||||||||
Capital expenditures | (3,204 | ) | (2,163 | ) | (3,167 | ) | ||||||||
Purchases of investments | (40,076 | ) | (30,045 | ) | (64,266 | ) | ||||||||
Proceeds from maturities of investments | 4,500 | 5,304 | 47,363 | |||||||||||
Proceeds from sales of investments | 20,440 | 40,728 | 29,000 | |||||||||||
Acquisition of Eyretel plc, net of cash acquired of $38,814 | | (21,413 | ) | | ||||||||||
Purchase of other business assets | | (2,385 | ) | (6 | ) | |||||||||
Allocation from restricted cash | | | 5,258 | |||||||||||
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities | (18,340 | ) | (9,974 | ) | 14,182 | |||||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: | ||||||||||||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options | 12,614 | 1,018 | 896 | |||||||||||
Proceeds from employee stock purchase plan | 689 | 559 | 370 | |||||||||||
Repayments of notes receivable from stockholders | | 484 | | |||||||||||
Stock repurchases | | (734 | ) | (2,365 | ) | |||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | 13,303 | 1,327 | (1,099 | ) | ||||||||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash | 3,368 | 4,138 | (101 | ) | ||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 21,124 | (8,572 | ) | 21,880 | ||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | 21,517 | 30,089 | 8,209 | |||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year | $ | 42,641 | $ | 21,517 | $ | 30,089 | ||||||||
Supplemental cash flow information: | ||||||||||||||
Cash paid for interest | | $ | 86 | | ||||||||||
Cash paid for income taxes | $ | 245 | $ | 229 | $ | 168 | ||||||||
Non-cash financing activities: | ||||||||||||||
Repayments of notes receivable and interest from stockholders | | $ | 985 | $ | 872 | |||||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-9
WITNESS SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
BusinessWitness Systems, Inc. ("Witness") is a publicly traded company that provides an integrated performance optimization software suite that enables global enterprises to capture customer intelligence and optimize workforce performance. Our solution is comprised of Voice over Internet Protocol ("VoIP") telephony, compliance, high-volume and business-driven recording solutions, as well as performance analysis and e-learning applications. Our software suite delivers an integrated system for continuous performance improvement in multimedia customer interaction centers, Internet Protocol ("IP") telephony and back office environments to enhance the customer experience. Our enterprise collaboration architecture allows contact center management to share information gathered in the contact center with other departments that service the customer, as well as with executives throughout the organization. Using an integrated business consulting, installation and training methodology, we provide services to support an effective and rapid deployment of our software that enables organizations to maximize their return on investment in our products and services. Our software is designed to integrate with a variety of third-party software applications, such as customer relationship management ("CRM") and enterprise resource planning applications, and with existing telephony and computer network hardware and software. Many of our customers are companies with an international presence and one or more contact centers that handle voice and data customer interactions for outbound sales and marketing operations, inbound service/support lines, or both.
We are headquartered in Roswell, Georgia with other offices in the United States, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, India, Japan, Mexico, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom. We were originally incorporated in 1988 in Georgia and were reincorporated in Delaware in 1997.
Principles of Consolidation and ReclassificationsThe consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of Witness Systems, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. During the first quarter of 2003, we acquired Eyretel plc ("Eyretel"), a U.K.-based provider of compliance and recording solutions for customer contact centers. We commenced the consolidation of their results of operations on March 22, 2003, the date we assumed majority ownership of Eyretel. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation, including the reclassification of $9.2 million of auction rate securities from cash and cash equivalents to available for sale securities, which are reported as short-term investments. Prior period information related to auction rate securities in the statements of cash flows was also reclassified, which impacted cash flows from investing activities by $(2.9) million and $8.7 million in 2003 and 2002, respectively. There was no impact on net income or cash flow from operations as a result of the reclassification.
Use of EstimatesThe consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make certain estimates and judgments that affect our reported assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and our related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Certain Risks and UncertaintiesFactors that could affect our future operating results and cause actual results to vary materially from expectations include, but are not limited to, lower than
F-10
anticipated revenue growth from existing customers, our ability to attract new customers, our ability to grow through acquisitions and to successfully integrate acquisitions, the availability and cost of debt and equity financing, technology changes, or a decline in the financial stability of our customers. Negative developments in these or other risk factors could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
Cash and Cash Equivalents and InvestmentsCash and cash equivalents consist of cash on deposit, money market accounts, commercial paper and U.S. Government agency securities. We consider all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
Investments are classified as available for sale and are carried at fair market value. Unrealized holding gains and losses on such investments are reported as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) until realized. If a decline in fair value is determined to be other than temporary, the cost basis of the individual security is written down to fair value as a new cost basis resulting in a realized loss. Realized gains and losses from sales are based on the specific identification method. Our investments are presented as current assets as they represent the investment of cash available to be used in current operations within the next year.
Accounts ReceivableAccounts receivable include amounts due from customers for which revenue has been recognized. We perform ongoing evaluations of our customers and continuously monitor collections and payments and provide an allowance for doubtful accounts through a charge to selling, general and administrative expense based on the aging of the underlying receivables, our historical experience and any specific customer collection issues that we have identified. Account balances are charged off against the allowance after reasonable means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote. We also record provisions for estimated sales allowances on product and service related revenues at the time the related revenues are recorded. These estimates are based on historical experience, analysis of customer credits and other known factors and are charged against revenues when recorded.
Property and EquipmentProperty and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Property and equipment are depreciated and amortized using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Leasehold improvements are amortized using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated life of the asset or the remaining term of the lease. Property and equipment is comprised of the following amounts (in thousands) and generally have the following estimated useful lives:
|
December 31, |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2004 |
2003 |
||||
Computer equipment (2 years) | $ | 5,069 | $ | 5,091 | ||
Software (2 - 3 years) | 3,093 | 2,571 | ||||
Other equipment (5 years) | 3,725 | 2,880 | ||||
Furniture and fixtures (5 years) | 690 | 593 | ||||
Leasehold improvements | 3,111 | 2,562 | ||||
15,688 | 13,697 | |||||
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization | 9,491 | 7,556 | ||||
$ | 6,197 | $ | 6,141 | |||
F-11
Depreciation and amortization on property and equipment was $3.2 million, $3.8 million and $3.2 million in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
Long-Lived AssetsLong-lived assets, such as property and equipment and intangible assets, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. All of our intangible assets are amortized using the straight-line method. Estimated useful lives of intangible assets are reviewed annually with any changes in estimated useful lives being accounted for prospectively over the revised remaining useful life. Recoverability of assets to be held and used would be measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to the estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized in the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. To date no events or changes in circumstances have occurred that would require us to test long-lived assets for recoverability.
Revenue Recognition and Deferred RevenueWe recognize revenue in accordance with the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants' Statement of Position ("SOP") 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, and SOP 98-9, Modification of SOP 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, With Respect to Certain Transactions. Revenue is primarily derived from licensing software and providing related services including maintenance. Product revenue, which can include software and hardware, is recognized when persuasive evidence of an agreement exists, delivery of the product has occurred, the fee is fixed or determinable, collection is probable and vendor specific objective evidence ("VSOE") of fair value exists to allocate revenue to the undelivered elements of the arrangement. The Company reports hardware revenue gross in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force No. 99-19, Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal versus Net as an Agent, because the factors indicating gross reporting outweigh the factors indicating net reporting. We recognize revenue using the residual method of accounting when customer orders contain multiple element arrangements, including the sale of licensed software, hardware, maintenance, and professional services. We generally have VSOE of fair value for maintenance and professional services, but not for the software and hardware elements of the order. Under the residual method, services revenue, including maintenance and professional services, is deferred at an amount equal to its fair value until those elements are delivered. Consequently, product revenue for the software and hardware may be recognized (i) upon delivery of those products when we have VSOE for the related maintenance and professional services sold and (ii) at an amount representing the difference between the total order amount and the amount deferred.
Services revenue includes installation, training, consulting, maintenance and reimbursable travel expenses. Revenue from installation, training and consulting services is recognized upon performance of the related services and is offered and billed as separate elements of contracts. Reimbursable travel expenses revenue is recognized upon incurrence of the related expenses. The functionality of the software and any hardware sold is not dependent on installation and training services and customization is not required to enable our customers to use our products. Maintenance is offered as a separate element and the majority of contracts include the right to unspecified upgrades on a when-and-if available basis. Maintenance revenue is deferred and recognized ratably over the term of the related maintenance contract.
Deferred revenue consists of amounts collected from customers for products and services that have not met the criteria for revenue recognition.
F-12
Advertising CostsAdvertising costs are expensed as incurred. Advertising expenses were $0.3 million in each of the years ended 2004, 2003 and 2002.
Research and Development CostsResearch and development costs consist primarily of personnel and consulting costs involved with product development and allocated overhead. These costs are expensed as incurred and include software development costs incurred prior to the establishment of technological feasibility.
Software Development CostsIn accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board's ("FASB") Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 86, software development costs are expensed until technological feasibility of the product has been established and are capitalized commencing upon the establishment of technological feasibility through general release to customers. Amortization of software development costs begins when the product is available for general release and is amortized using the greater of: (1) the straight-line method over the expected life of the product or (2) the ratio of current product revenue to the total of current and future product revenue. At each balance sheet date, the unamortized software development costs are compared to the net realizable value of the underlying product and to the extent any unamortized capitalized costs exceed the net realizable value of the asset, those costs are written off. As of December 31, 2004, and 2003, unamortized software development costs were $0.4 million and $0.6 million, respectively, and are included in other assets on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. During 2004, $0.4 million in software development costs was amortized to cost of product revenue. We did not have any software development cost amortization in 2003 and 2002.
Merger-Related Costs and Purchase Price ContingenciesMerger-related costs include expenses that are directly and incrementally related to a merger, including costs related to integrating the software products of the acquired company, training personnel on products acquired, establishing the infrastructure and consolidating the operations of the acquired company. Merger-related costs also include costs related to Witness lease terminations and severance associated with Witness employee terminations resulting from closures and terminations during the merger integration process. We account for merger-related costs in accordance with SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities, which requires that a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity only be recognized when the liability is incurred.
In accounting for acquisitions, we accrue for certain loss contingencies that exist at the date of acquisition. We reduce such liabilities as those contingencies are resolved or if we determine that the contingency no longer represents a probable loss. Any adjustments to these liabilities prior to the finalization of the purchase price impact purchase consideration. Any subsequent adjustments will impact our results of operations, except as prescribed by Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") No. 95-3, Recognition of Liabilities in Connection with a Purchase Business Combination.
Stock-Based CompensationWe generally do not record compensation expense for options granted to our employees because all options granted under our stock option plans have an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. As permitted under SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based CompensationTransition and Disclosure, and SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, we have elected to continue to apply the provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and have adopted the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123. The following table illustrates the effect on net
F-13
income (loss) and net income (loss) per share if we had applied the fair value method as prescribed by SFAS No. 123 (in thousands, except per share data):
|
Year ended December 31, |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
||||||||
Reported net income (loss) | $ | 9,446 | $ | (20,569 | ) | $ | 48 | ||||
Add: Stock-based employee compensation expense included in reported net income (loss), net of tax | 59 | 129 | 115 | ||||||||
Deduct: Total stock-based compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of tax | (8,444 | ) | (7,893 | ) | (11,472 | ) | |||||
Pro forma net income (loss) | $ | 1,061 | $ | (28,333 | ) | $ | (11,309 | ) | |||
Net income (loss) per share: | |||||||||||
Reported basic | $ | 0.40 | $ | (0.94 | ) | $ | 0.00 | ||||
Pro forma basic | $ | 0.05 | $ | (1.29 | ) | $ | (0.50 | ) | |||
Reported diluted | $ | 0.36 | $ | (0.94 | ) | $ | 0.00 | ||||
Pro forma diluted | $ | 0.04 | $ | (1.29 | ) | $ | (0.50 | ) | |||
See Note 11 for a description of the option pricing assumptions used to estimate the fair value of equity instruments granted to employees.
Income TaxesWe account for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, which requires companies to recognize deferred income tax assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates for the effect of temporary differences between the book and tax bases of recorded assets and liabilities. The effect on deferred income tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. SFAS No. 109 also requires that deferred income tax assets be reduced by a valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred income tax asset will not be realized. We evaluate the realizability of our deferred income tax assets and establish a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred income tax assets based on an assessment of the likelihood of their realization. We evaluate certain relevant criteria including deferred income tax liabilities that can be used to offset deferred income tax assets, estimates of future taxable income of appropriate character within the carry forward period available, and tax planning strategies.
Net Income (Loss) Per ShareWe calculate net income (loss) per share pursuant to SFAS No. 128, Earnings Per Share. Basic net income (loss) per share is calculated by dividing our net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. When the effects are not anti-dilutive, diluted net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing our net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares outstanding and the dilutive impact of all dilutive stock options. The dilutive impact of stock options is determined by applying the treasury stock method. (See Note 2 for further information.)
Fair Value of Financial InstrumentsAt December 31, 2004 and 2003, our financial instruments included cash and cash equivalents, investments, accounts receivable and accounts payable. We believe the carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate
F-14
fair values because of the short-term maturities of these instruments. Our investments are carried at fair value.
Foreign CurrencyGenerally, the functional currency has been determined to be the local currency for our foreign subsidiaries. As a result, those subsidiaries' assets and liabilities are translated at year-end exchange rates and income statement items are translated at average exchange rates prevailing during the year. Such translation adjustments are recorded as a component of stockholders' equity and other comprehensive income (loss).
Net gains from foreign currency denominated transactions are included in interest and other income, net and were $0.3 million, $0.4 million and $0 million in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
Recent Accounting PronouncementsIn December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued SFAS No. 123R (Revised 2004), Share-Based Payment, which requires that the compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions be recognized in financial statements based on alternative fair value models. The share-based compensation cost will be measured based on the fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued. We currently disclose pro forma compensation expense quarterly and annually by calculating the stock option grants' fair value using the Black-Scholes model (see above). Upon adoption, pro forma disclosure will no longer be an alternative. We will begin to apply SFAS No. 123R using the most appropriate fair value model as of the interim reporting period beginning July 1, 2005. We are evaluating the requirements under SFAS 123R and expect the adoption to have a significant adverse impact on our results of operations but will not impact our cash flows.
In March 2004, the FASB issued EITF No. 03-1, The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments. EITF No. 03-1 includes new guidance for evaluating and recording impairment losses on debt and equity instruments, as well as new disclosure requirements for investments that are deemed to be temporarily impaired. The disclosure requirements in EITF No 03-1 were effective for annual periods ending after June 15, 2004; however, the effective date of the recognition and measurement provisions of EITF 03-01 has been delayed by the FASB. We do not expect the adoption of the recognition and measurement provisions of EITF No. 03-1 to have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
F-15
2. Net Income (Loss) Per Share
The following is a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator used in the calculation of basic and diluted net income (loss) per share (in thousands, except per share data):
|
Year Ended December 31, |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 9,446 | $ | $(20,569 | ) | $ | $48 | ||||
Weighted average shares of common stock and common stock equivalents outstanding: | |||||||||||
Basic | 23,361 | 21,991 | 22,626 | ||||||||
Dilutive effect of stock options computed using the treasury stock method | 2,723 | | 898 | ||||||||
Diluted common shares and share equivalents outstanding | 26,084 | 21,991 | 23,524 | ||||||||
Net income (loss) per share: | |||||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.40 | $ | (0.94 | ) | $ | 0.00 | ||||
Diluted | $ | 0.36 | $ | (0.94 | ) | $ | 0.00 | ||||
We have excluded all outstanding stock options from the calculation of diluted net loss per common share for 2003 because we reported a loss in this period and all such securities are anti-dilutive. The total number of share equivalents excluded from the calculations of historical diluted net loss per common share for 2003 was 954,423 calculated using the treasury stock method. (See Note 11 for further information on stock options.) In 2004, 2003 and 2002, 461,087, 4,392,990 and 3,587,378 stock options, respectively, were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because they had exercise prices that exceeded the average fair market value of our common stock for those periods, and therefore had an anti-dilutive effect. (See Note 15 for further information regarding the issuance of 2.1 million shares of our common stock in January 2005.)
F-16
3. Cash and Cash Equivalents and Investments
The amortized cost and fair market value of cash and cash equivalents and investments available for sale as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 were as follows:
|
|
Unrealized |
|
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
December 31, 2004 |
|
|
|||||||||||
Cost |
Gain |
Loss |
Market |
||||||||||
|
(In thousands) |
||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents: | |||||||||||||
Cash | $ | 12,064 | | | $ | 12,064 | |||||||
Money market funds | 24,537 | | | 24,537 | |||||||||
Commercial paper | 3,766 | | | 3,766 | |||||||||
U.S. Government agency securities | 2,274 | | | 2,274 | |||||||||
Total cash and cash equivalents | $ | 42,641 | | | $ | 42,641 | |||||||
Investments: | |||||||||||||
Corporate debt securities | $ | 13,736 | | $ | (11 | ) | $ | 13,725 | |||||
U.S. Government agency securities | 11,940 | | | 11,940 | |||||||||
Auction rate securities | 5,000 | | | 5,000 | |||||||||
Commercial paper | 2,509 | | | 2,509 | |||||||||
Certificates of deposit | 668 | | | 668 | |||||||||
Total investments | $ | 33,853 | | $ | (11 | ) | $ | 33,842 | |||||
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
December 31, 2003 |
|
|
||||||||||||
Cost |
Gain |
Loss |
Market |
|||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents: | ||||||||||||||
Cash | $ | 12,836 | | | $ | 12,836 | ||||||||
Money market funds | 7,682 | | | 7,682 | ||||||||||
Commercial paper | 999 | | | 999 | ||||||||||
Total cash and cash equivalents | $ | 21,517 | | | $ | 21,517 | ||||||||
Investments: | ||||||||||||||
Auction rate securities | $ | 9,200 | | | $ | 9,200 | ||||||||
Corporate debt securities | 6,621 | $ | 1 | $ | (9 | ) | 6,613 | |||||||
U.S. Government agency securities | 3,000 | 2 | (2 | ) | 3,000 | |||||||||
Certificates of deposit | 542 | | | 542 | ||||||||||
Total investments | $ | 19,363 | $ | 3 | $ | (11 | ) | $ | 19,355 | |||||
At December 31, 2004, the fair market value of investments with remaining maturity dates ranging from 91 days to one year totaled $21.4 million, investments with maturity dates ranging from one to three years totaled $7.4 million, and investments with maturities greater than three years totaled $5.0 million. In contemplation of funding the 2005 acquisition discussed in Note 15, we recognized a loss of $0.1 million during 2004, resulting from the write-down of amortized cost to fair value at December 31, 2004. The unrealized holding losses of $11,000 at December 31, 2004 were comprised of two corporate debt securities with A plus ratings with a fair market value of $2.1 million. The decline in fair value was due to the slight rise in interest rates subsequent to the date of purchase. As of
F-17
December 31, 2004, neither of the securities had been in a loss position for more than 12 months, and we believe this impairment to be temporary. At December 31, 2003, $10.2 million in investments had maturity dates ranging from one to three years and $9.2 million with maturities greater than three years. We realized $0.2 million of securities gains during 2003 due to the liquidation of our investment portfolio during 2003 to fund the Eyretel acquisition. There were no realized gains or losses during 2002.
We recorded interest income of $1.0 million, $0.8 million and $1.6 million during 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
4. Intangible Assets
The following tables present the components of intangible assets (in thousands):
|
December 31, 2004 |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Gross Amount |
Accumulated Amortization |
Net Amount |
||||||
Acquired technology | $ | 15,588 | $ | 9,664 | $ | 5,924 | |||
Distribution arrangements | 4,343 | 1,536 | 2,807 | ||||||
Customer list | 2,336 | 915 | 1,421 | ||||||
Trademarks | 1,237 | 789 | 448 | ||||||
Patents | 295 | 93 | 202 | ||||||
$ | 23,799 | $ | 12,997 | $ | 10,802 | ||||
|
December 31, 2003 |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Gross Amount |
Accumulated Amortization |
Net Amount |
||||||
Acquired technology | $ | 17,120 | $ | 4,696 | $ | 12,424 | |||
Distribution arrangements | 5,081 | 849 | 4,232 | ||||||
Customer list | 2,746 | 455 | 2,291 | ||||||
Trademarks | 1,373 | 379 | 994 | ||||||
Patents | 190 | 48 | 142 | ||||||
$ | 26,510 | $ | 6,427 | $ | 20,083 | ||||
The acquired technology and trademarks are being amortized using the straight-line method over three and four years, respectively, and the distribution arrangements, customer list and patents are being amortized using the straight-line method over five years. The intangible assets and amortization expenses are subject to foreign currency translation and deferred tax adjustments. Amortization of
F-18
intangible assets included in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations is as follows (in thousands):
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||
Included in: | ||||||||||
Cost of product revenue | $ | 4,441 | $ | 4,139 | $ | 50 | ||||
Selling, general and administrative | 1,470 | 1,774 | 13 | |||||||
Research and development | | | 338 | |||||||
$ | 5,911 | $ | 5,913 | $ | 401 | |||||
The estimated future amortization expense of the intangible assets as of December 31, 2004 is as follows (in thousands):
2005 | $ | 6,012 | |
2006 | 2,942 | ||
2007 | 1,439 | ||
2008 | 367 | ||
2009 | 42 | ||
$ | 10,802 | ||
5. Eyretel Acquisition
During the first quarter of 2003, we acquired a controlling interest in Eyretel. We paid 25 pence per share for a total purchase price of approximately £35.3 million, or $55.3 million, excluding shares owned by Eyretel's employee stock option trust at the time of acquisition and other acquisition costs. The acquisition extended our presence in international markets and expanded our product line by adding a full-time compliance recording solution. We commenced the consolidation of Eyretel's results on March 22, 2003, the date we assumed majority ownership of Eyretel. The acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting.
The following summarizes the total purchase price for Eyretel (in thousands):
Purchase price (paid in cash) | $ | 55,269 | |
Direct transaction costs | 4,458 | ||
$ | 59,727 | ||
Under the purchase method of accounting, the total purchase price is allocated to Eyretel's net tangible and intangible assets based upon their estimated fair values as of the date of the acquisition. During the first quarter of 2004, we recorded our final adjustments to the purchase price allocation, the
F-19
majority of which affected deferred income taxes and intangible assets. The final purchase price allocation is as follows (in thousands):
Cash and investments | $ | 38,814 | |||
Other current assets | 22,438 | ||||
Property and equipment, net | 2,597 | ||||
Identifiable intangible assets acquired: | |||||
Acquired technology | 10,700 | ||||
Distribution arrangements | 4,124 | ||||
Customer lists | 1,956 | ||||
Trademarks | 1,007 | ||||
In-process research and development | 7,840 | ||||
Total assets acquired | 89,476 | ||||
Restructuring accruals | (5,254 | ) | |||
Deferred revenue | (5,512 | ) | |||
Other current liabilities | (16,165 | ) | |||
Other long-term liabilities | (2,536 | ) | |||
Deferred income taxes | (282 | ) | |||
Total liabilities assumed | (29,749 | ) | |||
$ | 59,727 | ||||
The fair values of identifiable intangible assets was determined with the assistance of Taylor Consulting Group, Inc., an independent third-party appraiser, using either an income or cost approach taking into consideration the nature, risks, historical patterns, economic characteristics, and future considerations of the assets. We estimated that $7.8 million of the purchase price of Eyretel represented acquired in-process research and development ("IPR&D") related to developing enhancements and new products for the voice and data recording, quality monitoring and analysis industry that had not yet reached technological feasibility and had no alternative future use. Accordingly, these amounts were immediately charged to expense upon consummation of the acquisition. We calculated the value of the IPR&D by utilizing a discounted cash flow methodology, focusing on the income-producing capabilities of the in-process technologies and taking into consideration: stage of completion; complexity of work to date and to complete; anticipated product development and introduction schedules; forecasted product sales cycles; internal and external risk factors; revenue and operating expense estimates; contributory asset charges; and costs already incurred and the expected costs to complete.
Supplemental unaudited pro forma information reflecting the acquisition of Eyretel as if it occurred on January 1, 2003 is as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
2003 |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
Total revenues | $ | 121,958 | ||
Net loss | (25,219 | ) | ||
Net loss per sharebasic and diluted | $ | (1.15 | ) | |
Weighted average sharesbasic and diluted | 21,991 |
F-20
The pro forma results above include adjustments for the amortization expense of intangible assets arising from the acquisition and the reduction of interest income assuming the purchase was paid from available cash. In addition, the pro forma results exclude the IPR&D charge and certain merger-related and other costs directly attributable to the acquisition.
6. Acquisition-Related Restructuring Accruals and Merger-Related Costs
As a result of the Eyretel acquisition, we recorded $5.1 million in certain acquisition-related restructuring accruals comprised of Eyretel personnel reductions, the closing of certain Eyretel facilities and the accrual of abandoned leased premises. All such costs met the criteria for accrual as outlined in ETF No. 95-3, Recognition of Liabilities in Connection with a Purchase Business Combination, and were included among the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the purchase of Eyretel. Any reductions to the acquisition-related restructuring accruals subsequent to March 2004 offset the intangible assets purchased from Eyretel. The following table summarizes the restructuring accrual activity (in thousands):
|
Severance and Benefits |
Facilities |
Total |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Accrual at December 31, 2002 | | | | ||||||||
Acquisition-related restructuring accruals | $ | 2,522 | $ | 2,436 | $ | 4,958 | |||||
Cash payments | (2,138 | ) | (662 | ) | (2,800 | ) | |||||
Foreign exchange translation | | 162 | 162 | ||||||||
Accrual at December 31, 2003 | $ | 384 | $ | 1,936 | $ | 2,320 | |||||
Adjustment to acquisition-related restructuring accruals | (203 | ) | 393 | 190 | |||||||
Cash payments | (181 | ) | (488 | ) | (669 | ) | |||||
Foreign exchange translation | | 203 | 203 | ||||||||
Accrual at December 31, 2004 | | 2,044 | 2,044 | ||||||||
Less: Long-term portion | | 1,831 | 1,831 | ||||||||
Current portion at December 31, 2004 | | $ | 213 | $ | 213 | ||||||
We also accrued merger-related costs related to Witness lease terminations and severance associated with Witness employee terminations during the merger integration process that are classified as merger-related costs in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. All such costs met the criteria for accrual as outlined in SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities, and were recorded as merger-related costs in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for 2004 and 2003. The following table summarizes the merger-related cost
F-21
accrual activity for 2004 and 2003, included in accrued expenses in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets (in thousands):
|
Severance and Benefits |
Facilities |
Total |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Accrual at December 31, 2002 | | | | ||||||||
Merger-related provision | $ | 1,470 | $ | 722 | $ | 2,192 | |||||
Cash payments | (1,046 | ) | (722 | ) | (1,768 | ) | |||||
Accrual at December 31, 2003 | $ | 424 | | $ | 424 | ||||||
Cash payments | (384 | ) | | (384 | ) | ||||||
Accrual at December 31, 2004 | $ | 40 | | $ | 40 | ||||||
The following table summarizes all merger-related costs that were charged to expense during the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 (in thousands):
|
December 31, |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2004 |
2003 |
|||||
Eyretel: | |||||||
Merger-related costs (as shown in table above) | | $ | 2,192 | ||||
Adjustments to acquisition liabilities | (543 | ) | | ||||
Integration costs | | 3,875 | |||||
Bonus expense | 838 | 933 | |||||
Cost of sterling-based forward exchange contract | | 865 | |||||
Blue Pumpkin: | |||||||
Integration costs | 203 | | |||||
$ | 498 | $ | 7,865 | ||||
During 2004 and 2003, we incurred merger-related costs pertaining to the acquisition of Eyretel and the Blue Pumpkin Software, Inc. ("Blue Pumpkin") acquisition that closed in January 2005. (See Note 15 for further information regarding the acquisition of Blue Pumpkin.) Merger-related costs include the following: merger-related restructuring provisions which are described above; adjustments to certain Eyretel acquisition liabilities; integration costs for expenses related to integrating the software products, training personnel on the new products, establishing the infrastructure and consolidating the operations; bonus expense related primarily to the accrual of a bonus payable to Eyretel's former Chief Executive Officer, now our Chief Operating Officer ("COO"); and the cost of a forward exchange contract that was executed in order to fix the price of the Eyretel acquisition in US dollars. Our Board of Directors agreed to pay a bonus of £1.0 million to our COO in connection with the Eyretel acquisition and subsequent integration. In March 2004, £0.4 million of this bonus was paid and the remaining balance of £0.6 million (or $1.1 million as of December 31, 2004) is due March 2005. This bonus is being recognized over the related service period through the first quarter of 2005.
7. Purchase of Other Business' Assets
In February 2003, we purchased the assets of a software and services company in order to acquire certain business intelligence technology for $2.4 million in cash, including direct costs of $0.3 million. As a result of the purchase, we recorded an intangible asset of $2.5 million for acquired technology.
F-22
8. Accrued Expenses
Accrued expenses consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
December 31, |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2004 |
2003 |
||||
Accrued commissions, compensation and benefits | $ | 6,762 | $ | 7,495 | ||
Restructuring and merger-related expenses | 253 | 1,118 | ||||
Other accrued acquisition liabilities | 2,337 | 6,422 | ||||
Other accrued expenses | 6,956 | 7,333 | ||||
$ | 16,308 | $ | 22,368 | |||
9. Line of Credit
In March 2004, we extended the maturity date on our $15.0 million line of credit to March 2005. At our election, borrowings under the line of credit bear interest at the bank's prime rate or LIBOR plus 300 basis points with interest payable monthly. Borrowings under the revolving line of credit are limited to 85% of eligible accounts receivable, as defined by the agreement. The revolving line of credit is secured by all of our assets and requires compliance with various covenants, including liquidity ratios and tangible net worth requirements, among others. As of December 31, 2004, we were in compliance with all bank covenants. In association with a 2005 acquisition, we amended the credit facility to replace the tangible net worth requirement with an EBITDA financial covenant. (See Note 15 for further information regarding the acquisition of Blue Pumpkin.)
As of December 31, 2004, we had no amounts outstanding under the line of credit and the amount available for borrowing was $12.2 million, which was net of outstanding letters of credit of $2.8 million. The letters of credit secure the lease on our corporate headquarters facility and have decreasing schedules that ultimately expire in 2007. In addition, we have a £0.3 million letter of credit securing our premises in the United Kingdom.
10. Stockholders' Equity
Comprehensive IncomeAccumulated other comprehensive income consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
December 31, |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2004 |
2003 |
|||||
Cumulative foreign currency translation adjustments | $ | 4,953 | $ | 3,994 | |||
Unrealized loss on investments | (11 | ) | (8 | ) | |||
$ | 4,942 | $ | 3,986 | ||||
Stock RepurchasesIn 2002, our Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program to spend up to $10.0 million to repurchase our common stock. As of December 31, 2004, we had repurchased 1,045,500 shares of our common stock for $3.1 million, which were constructively retired.
Notes Receivable from Stock SalesIn 1999, we received notes totaling $1.8 million from our Chief Executive Officer ("CEO") in exchange for 991,993 shares of our common stock. In February 2002, the notes receivable were refinanced in part with a full recourse note (the "2002 Note") for approximately
F-23
$1.5 million with floating monthly interest of 325 basis points over the Federal Funds Rate. The 2002 Note was payable in three equal payments of principal and interest due annually through February 2005. During the first quarter of 2003, the CEO made the first principal payment of approximately $0.5 million and the related interest. In December 2003, the CEO transferred 107,866 shares of our common stock, which he had held for more than six months, to an investment brokerage account in full satisfaction of the 2002 Note. The value of the shares on the date of transfer of $1.0 million was equal to the outstanding balance of principal and accrued interest on the 2002 Note.
11. Employee Benefit Plans
Stock Incentive PlansWe have three stock incentive plans: (i) the 1999 Stock Incentive Plan (the "1999 Plan"); (ii) the 2003 Broad Based Option Plan (the "2003 Plan"); and (iii) the 2003 Non-employee Director Stock Option Global Plan (the "Director Plan").
1999 PlanUnder the 1999 Plan, we may grant shares of common stock in the form of stock options, restricted stock awards, or stock appreciation rights to employees and key persons affiliated with Witness, as defined. In 2001, our stockholders modified a provision to increase, without further approval required, the number of shares authorized each year beginning on January 1, 2002 by a number equal to the lesser of 10% of the total number of shares of common stock then outstanding or 3,000,000 shares. During 2004, 2,276,254 stock options were granted under the 1999 Plan. At December 31, 2004, there were 12,892,232 shares authorized for issuance, of which 836,404 shares remain available for future grant. (See Note 15 for additional awards granted in 2005 in association with an acquisition.)
In 2003, we adopted the Director and Key Executive Stock Ownership Incentive Policy (the "Policy") under the 1999 Plan. The Policy intended to promote the interests of Witness and its stockholders by encouraging members of the Board of Directors and key executives to purchase shares of our common stock. Under the Policy, an eligible person who purchased at least 500 shares and up to 3,000 shares of our common stock in the open market was automatically and immediately granted five options from our 1999 Plan for each share purchased, with an exercise price equal to the closing price of our common stock on the date of purchase. One-half of the options vest on the first anniversary of the grant date, and the remaining options vest in 12 equal monthly installments thereafter. The Policy expired on June 15, 2004. As of December 31, 2004, 122,500 options were granted under this Policy, which are included in the 1999 Plan.
2003 PlanIn connection with the Eyretel acquisition, we established the 2003 Plan for former Eyretel employees. The 2003 Plan became effective in June 2003, allowing us to grant shares of common stock in the form of stock options. During 2004, no stock options were granted to former Eyretel employees under the 2003 Plan. At December 31, 2004, there were 1,600,000 shares authorized for issuance, of which 425,319 shares remain available for future grant. We do not anticipate increasing the number of shares available for issuance under the 2003 Plan.
Director PlanThe Director Plan became effective in 2003 and grants continuing non-employee members of the Board of Directors non-qualified options to purchase shares of our common stock pursuant to a formula award. During 2004, 40,000 stock options were granted under the Director Plan. At December 31, 2004, there were 500,000 shares authorized for issuance, of which 436,000 shares remain available for future grant.
F-24
Each plan remains in effect until the earlier of the tenth anniversary of its effective date or the date on which all reserved shares have been issued or are no longer available for use. Options granted under these plans during 2004, 2003 and 2002 were non-qualified stock options that were granted at a price greater than or equal to the fair value of the stock on the grant date. Option vesting terms typically range from two to four years. In June 2004, the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors directed that the term of stock options issued under the 1999 Plan be fixed at five years for all grants made subsequent to July 1, 2004. Options granted prior to July 1, 2004 have ten-year terms from the date of the grant. These plans provide for accelerated option vesting terms in connection with a change in control. To the extent that this occurs, we may have a future charge.
We incurred $0.1 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, in deferred stock compensation charges for certain option grants issued under the Policy and certain 1999 stock grants. There was no unamortized deferred stock compensation balance at December 31, 2004 and 2003.
The following summarizes stock option activity under all stock option plans:
|
Number of shares |
Weighted-average exercise price |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Balance at December 31, 2001 | 5,370,147 | $ | 7.82 | |||
Granted | 1,383,607 | 8.65 | ||||
Exercised | (378,017 | ) | 2.37 | |||
Cancelled | (769,620 | ) | 9.82 | |||
Balance at December 31, 2002 | 5,606,117 | 8.12 | ||||
Granted | 4,362,150 | 4.27 | ||||
Exercised | (284,843 | ) | 3.58 | |||
Cancelled | (1,061,194 | ) | 7.60 | |||
Balance at December 31, 2003 | 8,622,230 | 6.39 | ||||
Granted | 2,316,254 | 11.12 | ||||
Exercised | (2,223,636 | ) | 5.66 | |||
Cancelled | (992,689 | ) | 7.81 | |||
Balance at December 31, 2004 | 7,722,159 | 7.83 | ||||
The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at December 31, 2004:
Outstanding |
|
|
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Exercisable |
||||||||||||
|
|
Weighted- Average Remaining Life |
Weighted- Average Exercise Price |
|||||||||
Range of Exercise Prices |
Number Outstanding |
Number of shares |
Weighted- Average Exercise Price |
|||||||||
$ 0.66 - $ 4.56 | 2,514,037 | 7.8 years | $ | 3.55 | 1,023,076 | $ | 3.00 | |||||
$ 4.60 - $ 8.86 | 2,607,362 | 6.7 years | 7.24 | 1,054,827 | 7.15 | |||||||
$ 8.94 - $13.32 | 1,981,394 | 6.6 years | 11.55 | 474,251 | 12.20 | |||||||
$13.42 - $34.00 | 619,366 | 6.1 years | 15.79 | 311,511 | 16.17 | |||||||
7,722,159 | 7.0 years | 7.83 | 2,863,665 | 7.49 | ||||||||
F-25
The following are the fair values and assumptions used in calculating the pro forma option expense amounts under SFAS No. 123 which are disclosed in Note 1. The weighted-average fair value of stock options granted during 2004, 2003, and 2002 was $5.77, $2.31 and $5.58 per share, respectively, on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions: 2004volatility of 93%, expected dividend yield of 0%, risk-free interest rate of 2.52%, and an expected life of 2.4 years; 2003volatility of 100%, expected dividend yield of 0%, risk-free interest rate of 2.37%, and an expected life of 2.8 years; 2002volatility of 120%, expected dividend yield of 0%, risk-free interest rate of 3.25%, and an expected life of 2.5 years.
Employee Stock Purchase PlanOur employee stock purchase plan ("ESPP") allows our employees to purchase shares of common stock at a price per share that is 85% of the lesser of the fair market value as of the beginning or end of the semi-annual option period. The ESPP includes a provision to increase, without further approval required, the number of shares authorized each year on January 1 by a number equal to the lesser of 2% of the total number of shares of common stock then outstanding or 900,000 shares. As of December 31, 2004, 422,198 shares of common stock have been issued under the ESPP.
The following are the fair values and assumptions used in calculating the pro forma ESPP expense amounts under SFAS No. 123 which are disclosed in Note 1. The weighted-average fair value of the employee's purchase rights under the ESPP granted during 2004, 2003 and 2002 was $3.77, $1.74 and $5.10 per share, respectively, using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the same weighted-average assumptions as for the stock incentive plans except for the expected life assumption which was six months.
Retirement PlansWe have a U.S. tax-qualified defined contribution plan under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code (the "401(k) Plan"). Employees are eligible to participate the first of the month following their date of hire. The 401(k) Plan allows participants to contribute up to 100% of eligible compensation, subject to U.S. Internal Revenue Service limitations. The 401(k) Plan also provides for discretionary employer matching contributions. We also have a personal savings plan ("Savings Plan") for our United Kingdom employees. In accordance with the Inland Revenue limitations, employees are eligible to invest of up to 35% of base salary in the Savings Plan, which includes employer contributions ranging from 5% to 7% of employee compensation. We contributed $0.8 million, $0.6 million and $0.3 million to the 401(k) Plan and Savings Plan in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
Stockholder's Rights PlanWe have a stockholder rights plan (the "Rights Plan") which has the effect of causing substantial dilution to a person or group that attempts to acquire Witness on terms not approved by the Board of Directors. Under the Rights Plan, we issued a dividend of one right for each share of our common stock, par value of $0.01 per share, held by stockholders of record as of the close of business on November 4, 2002. Each right will entitle stockholders to purchase one unit of a share of our Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock for $25.00. The rights generally will be exercisable only upon the occurrence of certain events, and will expire on November 4, 2012.
The Rights Plan has no present dilutive effect on our capital structure, nor will it affect reported earnings per share or change the way our shares of common stock are traded. Neither the adoption of the Rights Plan, nor the dividend distribution of the rights, was taxable to our shareholders or Witness.
Change of ControlIn November 2004, we entered into change of control agreements with our senior officers, including our named executive officers noted in our 2004 annual proxy statement. In
F-26
general, these agreements provide the officers with severance benefits in the event of a change in control as defined. The agreements provide for Witness to pay the officer a multiple of his, or her, base salary and bonus, in a lump sum, as well as a minimum pro rata bonus for the year in which the change of control occurs, and payment of COBRA continuation coverage, life insurance premiums and long-term disability insurance premiums for a fixed period of time. In addition, the agreements provide for a gross-up payment for certain U.S. federal excise taxes that might result from the receipt of the severance payments. The severance payments vary by seniority, and involve multiples of 1.0, 1.5 or 2.0 times base salary and bonus. In the change of control agreements other than those for our CEO, COO and Chief Financial Officer ("CFO"), payments are made only if there is both a change of control of Witness and a termination of employment of the officer without cause (or a constructive termination) as determined by the terms of the respective agreements.
12. Income Taxes
The components of the provision for income tax expense (benefit) for 2004, 2003 and 2002 are as follows (in thousands):
|
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Federal | $ | 213 | $ | (40 | ) | $ | (32 | ) | |||
State | | | | ||||||||
Foreign | 186 | 347 | 293 | ||||||||
Total current | 399 | 307 | 261 | ||||||||
Foreign deferred | (87 | ) | | | |||||||
Total | $ | 312 | $ | 307 | $ | 261 | |||||
Income tax expense (benefit) differed from the amounts computed by applying the statutory U.S. federal income tax rate of 34% to income (loss) before provision for income taxes as a result of the following (in thousands):
|
Year ended December 31, |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
||||||||
Computed "expected" tax expense (benefit) | $ | 3,318 | $ | (6,889 | ) | $ | 105 | ||||
Increase (decrease) in income taxes resulting from: | |||||||||||
State income taxes, net of federal income taxes | 181 | (1,258 | ) | (7 | ) | ||||||
(Decrease) increase in valuation allowance for deferred income tax assets | (2,992 | ) | 9,372 | 411 | |||||||
Research and experimentation credits | (665 | ) | (460 | ) | (440 | ) | |||||
Nondeductible meals & entertainment | 225 | 155 | 148 | ||||||||
Income tax effect attributable to foreign operations at different rates, including foreign withholding | 158 | (323 | ) | 384 | |||||||
Other, net | 87 | (290 | ) | (340 | ) | ||||||
$ | 312 | $ | 307 | 261 | |||||||
F-27
The income tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of our deferred income tax assets and liabilities are presented below (in thousands):
|
December 31, |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||
Deferred income tax assets: | |||||||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts | $ | 940 | $ | 638 | |||||
Accrued expenses | 227 | 2,295 | |||||||
Property and equipment depreciation | 1,013 | 1,184 | |||||||
Identifiable intangible assets amortization | 3,118 | 3,473 | |||||||
Net operating losses and research and experimentation credits | 15,302 | 9,326 | |||||||
Foreign deferred income tax assets, principally net operating losses | 15,679 | 14,247 | |||||||
Gross deferred income tax assets | 36,279 | 31,163 | |||||||
Valuation allowance for deferred income tax assets | (33,833 | ) | (28,553 | ) | |||||
Net deferred income tax assets | 2,446 | 2,610 | |||||||
Deferred income tax liabilities: | |||||||||
Intangible assets | (2,700 | ) | (5,807 | ) | |||||
Net deferred income tax liability | $ | 254 | $ | 3,197 | |||||
The net change in the valuation allowance for deferred income tax assets for 2004, 2003 and 2002 was an increase of $5.3 million, $19.6 million and $0.4 million, respectively. The valuation increase in 2004 is comprised of ($3.0) million for current activity, $5.9 million due to stock option deductions, and $2.4 million for additional deferred assets that were previously unidentified, of which $2.9 million was related to a reduction in purchased deferred income tax assets credited to intangible assets. Included in the valuation allowance for deferred income tax assets is $6.7 million which, when realized, will reduce intangible assets in the U.K.
Deferred income taxes are not recognized for temporary differences related to investments in foreign subsidiaries when those investments are essentially permanent in duration. We are unable to estimate these deferred income taxes because it is not practicable for us to determine the amounts.
At December 31, 2004, we had net operating loss and research and experimentation credit carryforwards for U.S. federal income tax purposes of $31.4 million and $2.7 million, respectively, which expire in varying amounts beginning in the year 2014. We also have incurred net foreign losses in the amount of $44.4 million as of December 31, 2004, which are available to offset future taxable income in their respective foreign jurisdictions. These foreign losses expire in varying amounts beginning in 2005.
Included in the U.S. and U.K. net operating loss carryforwards are tax deductions of approximately $17.3 million and $2.7 million, respectively, resulting from the exercise of stock options. We have established a valuation allowance with respect to the tax benefit created by these tax deductions. In accordance with APB Opinion No. 25, any income tax benefit derived from these tax deductions is reflected as additional paid-in capital at the time we recognize any such income tax benefit. During 2004, we recognized $0.2 million of alternative minimum tax expense relating to the exercise of Witness common stock options.
F-28
Losses before income taxes from foreign operations were ($1.1) million, ($4.0) million and ($0.8) million in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Income (losses) before income taxes from U.S. operations were $10.9 million, ($16.3) million and $1.1 million in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
Estimates and judgments are required in determining our worldwide income tax expense. In the ordinary course of conducting business globally, there are many transactions and calculations whose ultimate tax outcome cannot be certain. Although we believe our estimates and judgments are reasonable, no assurance can be given that the final tax outcome of these matters will not be different from what is reflected in our historical income tax provisions and accruals. Such differences could have a material impact on our income tax provision and operating results in the period in which such a determination is made.
In December 2004, the FASB issued Staff Position No. FAS 109-2, Accounting and Disclosure Guidance for the Foreign Earnings Repatriation Provision within the American Jobs Creations Act of 2004. Corporations are allowed an 85% dividends received deduction in 2004 and 2005 on the repatriation of certain foreign earnings to a U.S. taxpayer, provided certain criteria are met. In 2005, we will complete our evaluation of the effects of the repatriation provision. At this time, the range of possible amounts that may be considered for repatriation, if any, and the tax effects of repatriating these amounts have not yet been determined.
13. Segment and Geographic Information
We consider ourselves to be in a single industry segment, specifically licensing and servicing of software applications to the customer interaction recording and analysis market. Our chief operating decision maker receives financial information by geographic region; however, our operating segments are aggregated into one reportable segment based upon similar economic characteristics, products, services and delivery methods.
World-wide annual revenue based on customer location is as follows (in thousands):
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||
United States | $ | 73,268 | $ | 59,830 | $ | 50,600 | ||||
United Kingdom | 39,166 | 24,009 | 2,199 | |||||||
Rest of world | 28,901 | 24,198 | 14,887 | |||||||
Total | $ | 141,335 | $ | 108,037 | $ | 67,686 | ||||
The rest of world revenue was derived primarily from customers located in Canada, Australia, India, Japan, and China. No individual customer accounted for more than 10% of consolidated revenue during 2004, 2003 or 2002, or accounts receivable at December 31, 2004 or 2003.
F-29
Long-lived assets, including intangible assets, by geography are as follows (in thousands):
|
December 31, |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2004 |
2003 |
|||||
United States | $ | 5,518 | $ | 5,893 | |||
United Kingdom | 8,533 | 16,351 | |||||
Rest of world | 2,948 | 3,980 | |||||
Total | $ | 16,999 | $ | 26,224 | |||
14. Commitments and Contingencies
Operating CommitmentsWe lease office facilities, including our corporate headquarters, and certain office furniture and equipment under various noncancelable operating lease agreements. Future minimum payments under leases net of sublease income with remaining terms greater than one year at December 31, 2004, and for the next five years and in the aggregate are as follows (in thousands):
December 31, |
|
||
---|---|---|---|
2005 | $ | 5,645 | |
2006 | 4,403 | ||
2007 | 3,981 | ||
2008 | 1,441 | ||
2009 | 1,436 | ||
Thereafter | 6,189 | ||
$ | 23,095 | ||
Lease expense for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002 was $5.7 million, $5.6 million and $4.2 million, respectively.
Legal ProceedingsFrom time to time we may be involved in legal proceedings and/or litigation arising in the ordinary course of our business.
On December 11, 2002, we filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division, a lawsuit against Knowlagent, Inc. ("Knowlagent"), which is the assignee of the United States Patent Nos. 6,324,282 B1 and 6,459,787 B2. Knowlagent has accused our eQuality Now software of infringing the above patents. We filed suit seeking a declaration that we did not and do not infringe either of the two patents listed above, as well as a declaration that the above patents are invalid and unenforceable. We also filed a claim requesting that if the patents are found to be valid, that one of our own employees be named the rightful inventor of the patents. We also requested monetary damages in an amount equal to the amount that Knowlagent has received from its use of the above patents. On December 31, 2002, Knowlagent filed its answer to our complaint as well as two counterclaims, alleging that we infringe and contribute to the infringement by others of the above patents; Knowlagent seeks both monetary damages and an injunction in connection with its counterclaim. We are currently in the discovery phase of the lawsuit and believe that any adverse outcome would not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
F-30
On July 20, 2004, STS Software Systems Ltd. ("STS Software"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of NICE Systems, Ltd. ("NICE Ltd."), filed a patent infringement suit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York against us ("New York Action"). The New York Action asserts that our products, including eQuality ContactStore for IP, infringe U.S. Patent No. 6,122,665 ("the "665 patent"). On the same day, we filed a declaratory judgment action against STS Software in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia ("Georgia Action"). We seek a declaration from the court that we have not infringed any valid claim of the "665 patent. By Order entered December 16, 2004, Judge Koeltl of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York granted our motion to transfer the New York Action to the Northern District of Georgia, which has now consolidated the former New York Action with the Georgia Action. The case has not yet been set on a discovery calendar and is at the most preliminary stage. We currently believe that any adverse outcome would not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
On August 30, 2004, we filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division, a lawsuit against NICE Systems, Inc. ("NICE Inc."), a wholly-owned subsidiary of NICE Ltd., alleging patent infringement. Specifically, we have alleged that NICE products, including the NiceUniverse products that include screen capture and synchronized screen and voice capture technologies, infringe claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,790,798 ("the "798 Patent") and 6,510,220 ("the "220 Patent"), both entitled "Method and Apparatus for Simultaneously Monitoring Computer User Screen and Telephone Activity from a Remote Location." We have sought an injunction and money damages for NICE's infringement of these two patents. NICE Inc. has answered and counterclaimed for declaratory judgments of non-infringement and invalidity. This suit is at the most preliminary stage.
We are not party to any litigation or other legal proceedings that we believe could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results or financial condition.
Indemnifications and WarrantiesWe more often than not indemnify our customers against damages and costs resulting from claims of patent, copyright, or trademark infringement associated with use of our software in its software licensing agreements. We have historically not made any payments under such indemnifications. However, we continue to monitor the conditions that are subject to the indemnifications to identify whether it is probable that a loss has occurred, and would recognize any such losses under the indemnifications when those losses are estimable. In addition, we warrant to customers that our software products operate substantially in accordance with the software product's specifications. Historically, no costs have been incurred related to software product warranties and none are expected in the future, and as such no accruals for warranty costs have been made.
15. Subsequent EventBlue Pumpkin Acquisition
On January 24, 2005, we completed the acquisition of Blue Pumpkin a privately held California corporation. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement and Plan of Reorganization, dated December 16, 2004 (the "Merger"), we paid an aggregate of $40 million in cash, which was financed from our existing cash and investments, and issued an aggregate of 2.1 million unregistered shares of Witness common stock which had a fair value of $35.7 million on January 24, 2005. Ten percent of the aggregate merger consideration is being held in escrow for one-year after the closing date of the Merger. The escrow period may be extended in the event that there are pending claims that are brought against the escrow fund within such one-year period. The escrow fund is available to compensate Witness, subject to
F-31
certain limitations, for losses resulting from, among other things, breaches of representations, warranties or covenants in the Merger and certain pending and potential claims.
The Merger is intended to extend our contact center performance optimization capability to include advanced workforce management software and services solutions. The acquisition expands our software and services by adding forecasting, scheduling, adherence and planning applications.
In January 2005, our Board of Director Compensation Committee approved an employment inducement award of approximately 800,000 shares of Witness common stock in the form of stock option grants to certain Blue Pumpkin employees. All of the inducement options have an exercise price equal to the market value on the date of the grant, subject to standard provisions for termination, forfeiture and acceleration, and are generally exercisable for five years from the date of grant. The inducement options will first become exercisable, as to 25 percent of the total amount, after one year from the date of grant, and commencing 13 months after grant and until the end of the 47th month following grant, the options will become exercisable as to an additional two percent per month and the balance upon the 48th month following grant.
F-32
Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
(In thousands)
|
Balance at Beginning of Year |
Charged against Revenue |
Charged to Expense |
Deductions |
Balance at End of Year |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts: | ||||||||||||||||
Year ended December 31, 2004 | $ | 2,840 | $ | 1,395 | $ | 513 | $ | (1,498 | ) | $ | 3,250 | |||||
Year ended December 31, 2003 | 1,574 | 268 | 2,779 | (1,781 | ) | 2,840 | ||||||||||
Year ended December 31, 2002 | 1,623 | 308 | 600 | (957 | ) | 1,574 |
F-33
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 of 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Dated: March 15, 2005 | WITNESS SYSTEMS, INC. | ||
By: |
/s/ DAVID B. GOULD David B. Gould Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons in the capacities and on the date indicated
/s/ DAVID B. GOULD David B. Gould |
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer | March 15, 2005 | ||
/s/ WILLIAM F. EVANS William F. Evans |
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
March 15, 2005 |
||
/s/ TOM BISHOP Tom Bishop |
Director |
March 15, 2005 |
||
/s/ THOMAS J. CROTTY Thomas J. Crotty |
Director |
March 15, 2005 |
||
/s/ JOEL G. KATZ Joel G. Katz |
Director |
March 15, 2005 |
||
/s/ DAN LAUTENBACH Dan Lautenbach |
Director |
March 15, 2005 |
||
/s/ TERRY OSBORNE Terry Osborne |
Director |
March 15, 2005 |
||
/s/ PETER SINISGALLI Peter Sinisgalli |
Director |
March 15, 2005 |
F-34