Back to GetFilings.com

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

Commission File Number: 001-31911

American Equity Investment Life Holding Company
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

        Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý    No o

        Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ý    No o

        Aggregate market value of the shares of the Registrant's common equity held by non-affiliates of the Registrant was $344,207,862 based on the closing price of $9.95 per share, the closing price of the common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on June 30, 2004.

        Shares of common stock outstanding as of February 28, 2005: 38,375,157

        Documents incorporated by reference: Portions of the Registrant's definitive proxy statement for the annual meeting of shareholders to be held June 9, 2005, which will be filed within 120 days after December 31, 2004, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this report.

        Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o

AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY
FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004
TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I

ITEM 1.    BUSINESS

Introduction

        We were formed on December 15, 1995 to develop, market, issue and administer annuities and life insurance. We are a full service underwriter of a broad array of annuity and insurance products. Our business consists primarily of the sale of fixed rate and index annuities and, accordingly, we have only one business segment. Our business strategy is to focus on our annuity business and earn predicable returns by managing investment spreads and investment risk. We are currently licensed to sell our products in 48 states and the District of Columbia.

        On December 9, 2003, we completed an initial public offering of 18,700,000 shares of our common stock at a price of $9.00 per share. Pursuant to the over-allotment option granted to the underwriters in the offering, the underwriters purchased an additional 2,000,000 shares on December 29, 2003 and an additional 805,000 shares on January 7, 2004, which fully exercised the over-allotment option. The proceeds from our initial public offering (including proceeds from shares issued pursuant to the over-allotment option), net of the underwriting discount and expenses, were approximately $178.0 million.

        Investor related information, including periodic reports filed on Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K and all amendments to such reports may be found on our internet website at www.american-equity.com as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports are filed with the SEC. In addition, the Company has available on its website its: (i) code of business conduct and ethics; (ii) audit committee charter; (iii) compensation committee charter; (iv) nominating/corporate governance committee charter and (v) corporate governance guidelines.

Annuity Market Overview

        Our target market includes the group of individuals ages 45-75 who are seeking to accumulate tax-deferred savings. We believe that significant growth opportunities exist for annuity products because of favorable demographic and economic trends. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, there were 35 million Americans age 65 and older in 2000, representing 12% of the U.S. population. By 2030, this sector of the population is expected to increase to 20% of the total population. Our fixed rate and index annuity products are particularly attractive to this group as a result of the guarantee of principal with respect to those products, competitive rates of credited interest, tax-deferred growth and alternative payout options.

        According to LIMRA International, total industry sales of individual annuities were $224.4 billion in 2004 and $218.8 billion in 2003. Fixed annuity sales, which include index and fixed rate annuities were $90.9 billion in 2004 and $89.4 billion in 2003. Sales of index annuities increased 69% to a record $24.3 billion in 2004 from $14.4 billion in 2003. We believe index annuities, which have a crediting rate linked to the change in various indices, appeal to policyholders interested in participating in returns linked to equity and/or bond markets without the risk of loss of principal. Our wide range of fixed rate annuity products has enabled us to enjoy favorable growth during volatile equity and bond markets.

Strategy

        Our business strategy is to focus on our annuity business and earn predictable returns by managing investment spreads and investment risk. Key elements of this strategy include the following:

        Expand our Current Independent Agency Network.    We believe that our successful relationships with approximately 70 national marketing organizations and, through them, 46,000 independent agents, represent a significant competitive advantage. We intend to grow and enhance our core

Page 3 of 46

distribution channel by expanding our relationships with national marketing organizations and independent agents, by addressing their product needs and by providing the highest quality service possible.

        Continue to Introduce Innovative and Competitive Products.    We intend to be at the forefront of the fixed and index annuity industry in developing and introducing innovative and new competitive products. We were the first company to introduce an index annuity which allowed policyholders to earn returns linked to the Dow Jones Index^sm. We were also one of the first companies to offer an index product offering a choice among interest crediting strategies which includes both equity and bond indices as well as a traditional fixed rate strategy. We believe that our continued focus on anticipating and being responsive to the product needs of our independent agents and policyholders will lead to increased customer loyalty, revenues and profitability.

        Use our Expertise to Achieve Targeted Spreads on Annuity Products.    We have had a successful track record in achieving the targeted spreads on our annuity products. We intend to leverage our experience and expertise in managing the investment spread during a range of interest rate environments to achieve our targeted spreads.

        Maintain our Profitability Focus and Improve Operating Efficiency.    We are committed to improving our profitability by advancing the scope and sophistication of our investment management and spread capabilities and continuously seeking out operating efficiencies within our company. We have made substantial investments in technology improvements to our business, including the development of a password-secure website which allows our independent agents to receive proprietary sales, marketing and product materials and the implementation of software designed to enable us to operate in a completely paperless environment with respect to policy administration. Further, we have implemented competitive incentive programs for our national marketing organizations, agents and employees to stimulate performance.

        Take Advantage of the Growing Popularity of Some of Our Products.    We believe that the growing popularity of some of our products that allow equity and bond market participation without the risk of loss of the premium deposit presents an attractive opportunity to grow our business. We intend to capitalize on our reputation as a leading marketer of index annuities in this expanding segment of the annuity market.

Products

        Our products include fixed rate annuities, index annuities, a variable annuity and life insurance.

Fixed Rate Annuities

        These products, which accounted for approximately 16% and 36% of our total annuity deposits collected for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, include single premium deferred annuities ("SPDAs"), flexible premium deferred annuities ("FPDAs") and single premium immediate annuities ("SPIAs"). An SPDA generally involves the tax-deferred accumulation of interest on a single premium paid by the policyholder. After a number of years, as specified in the annuity contract, the annuitant may elect to take the proceeds of the annuity either in a single payment or in a series of payments for life, for a fixed number of years, or for a combination of these payment options. We also sell SPDAs, under which the annual crediting rate is guaranteed for either a three-year or a five-year period. FDPAs are similar to SPDAs in many respects, except that the FPDA allows additional deposits in varying amounts by the policyholder without a new application.

        Our SPDAs and FPDAs (excluding the multi-year rate guaranteed products) generally have an interest rate (the "crediting rate") that is guaranteed by us for the first policy year. After the first policy year, we have the discretionary ability to change the crediting rate once annually to any rate at

Page 4 of 46

or above a guaranteed minimum rate. The guaranteed rate on our non-multi-year rate guaranteed policies in force and new issues ranges from 2.25% to 4.00%. The guaranteed rate on our multi-year rate guaranteed policies in force ranges from 3.05% to 4.80% for the three-year rate guaranteed product and from 3.25% to 7% for the five-year rate guaranteed product. The initial crediting rate is largely a function of the interest rate we can earn on invested assets acquired with new annuity deposits and the rates offered on similar products by our competitors. For subsequent adjustments to crediting rates, we take into account the yield on our investment portfolio, annuity surrender assumptions, competitive industry pricing and crediting rate history for particular groups of annuity policies with similar characteristics.

        Approximately 99% and 92% of our fixed rate annuity sales during the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, were "bonus" products. The initial crediting rate on these products specifies a bonus crediting rate ranging from 1% to 7% of the annuity deposit. After the first year, the bonus interest portion of the initial crediting rate is automatically discontinued, and the renewal crediting rate is established. Generally, there is a compensating adjustment in the commission paid to the agent to offset the first year interest bonus. In all situations, we obtain an acknowledgment from the policyholder, upon policy issuance, that a specified portion of the first year interest will not be paid in renewal years. As of December 31, 2004, crediting rates on our outstanding SPDAs and FPDAs generally ranged from 3.10% to 7.50%, excluding interest bonuses guaranteed for the first year. The average crediting rate on FPDAs and SPDAs including interest bonuses at December 31, 2004 was 4.42%, and the average crediting rate on those products excluding bonuses was 4.18%.

        Policyholders are typically permitted to withdraw all or a part of the premium paid, plus accrued interest credited to the account (the "accumulation value"), subject to the assessment of a surrender charge for withdrawals in excess of specified limits. Most of our SPDAs and FPDAs provide for penalty-free withdrawals of up to 10% of the accumulation value each year after the first year, subject to limitations. Withdrawals in excess of allowable penalty-free amounts are assessed a surrender charge during a penalty period which generally ranges from 3 to 15 years after the date the policy is issued. This surrender charge is initially 8.25% to 25% of the accumulation value and generally decreases by approximately one to two percentage points per year during the surrender charge period. Surrender charges are set at levels aimed at protecting us from loss on early terminations and reducing the likelihood of policyholders terminating their policies during periods of increasing interest rates. This practice lengthens the effective duration of the policy liabilities and enhances our ability to maintain profitability on such policies.

        Our SPIAs are designed to provide a series of periodic payments for a fixed period of time or for life, according to the policyholder's choice at the time of issue. The amounts, frequency, and length of time of the payments are fixed at the outset of the annuity contract. SPIAs are often purchased by persons at or near retirement age who desire a steady stream of payments over a future period of years. The implicit interest rate on SPIAs is based on market conditions when the policy is issued. The implicit interest rate on our outstanding SPIAs averaged 3.83% and 4.25% at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

Index Annuities

        Index annuities accounted for approximately 84% and 64% of the total annuity deposits collected for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. These products allow policyholders to link returns to the performance of a particular index without the risk of loss of their principal. Most of these products allow policyholders to transfer funds once a year among several different crediting strategies, including one or more index based strategies and a traditional fixed rate strategy.

        The annuity contract value is equal to the premiums paid increased for returns which are based upon a percentage (the "participation rate") of the annual appreciation (based in certain situations on

Page 5 of 46

monthly averages or monthly point-to-point calculations) in a recognized index or benchmark. The participation rate, which we may reset annually, generally varies among the index products from 50% to 100%. Some of the products also have an "asset fee" ranging from 1.5% to 5%, which is deducted from the interest to be credited. The asset fees may be adjusted annually by us, subject to stated limits. In addition, some products apply an overall limit (or "cap"), ranging from 5% to 13%, on the amount of annual interest the policyholder may earn in any one contract year, and the applicable cap also may be adjusted annually subject to stated minimums. The minimum guaranteed contract values are equal to 80% to 100% of the premium collected plus interest credited at an annual rate ranging from 2% to 3.5%. We purchase options on the applicable indices as an investment to provide the income needed to fund the amount of the index credits on the index products. The setting of the participation rates, asset fees and caps is a function of the interest rate we can earn on the invested assets acquired with annuity fund deposits, cost of options and features offered on similar products by competitors. Approximately 57% and 39% of our index annuity sales for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, were "premium bonus" products. The initial annuity deposit on these policies is increased at issuance by the specified premium bonus ranging from 1.5% to 10%. Generally, there is a compensating adjustment in the commission paid to the agent to offset the premium bonus.

        The index annuities provide for penalty-free withdrawals of up to 10% of premium or accumulation value (depending on the product) in each year after the first year of the annuity's term. Other withdrawals are subject to a surrender charge ranging initially from 5% to 20% over a surrender period ranging from 5 to 17 years. During the applicable surrender charge period, the surrender charges on some index products remain level, while on other index products, the surrender charges decline by one to two percentage points per year. After a number of years, as specified in the annuity contract, the annuitant may elect to take the proceeds of the annuity either in a single payment or in a series of payments for life, for a fixed number of years, a combination of these payment options, or re-enter into a new contract term.

Variable Annuities

        Variable annuities differ from fixed rate and index annuities in that the policyholder, rather than the insurance company, bears the investment risk and the policyholder's return of principal and rate of return are dependent upon the performance of the particular investment option selected by the policyholder. Profits on variable annuities are derived from the fees charged to contract owners rather than from the investment spread.

Life Insurance

        These products include traditional ordinary and term, universal life and other interest-sensitive life insurance products. We have approximately $2.6 billion of life insurance in force as of December 31, 2004. We intend to continue offering a complete line of life insurance products for individual and group markets. Premiums related to this business accounted for 3% of the revenues in the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 and 5% of the revenues in the year ended December 21, 2002.

Investments

        Investment activities are an integral part of our business, and net investment income is a significant component of our total revenues. Profitability of many of our products is significantly affected by spreads between interest yields on investments and rates credited on annuity liabilities. Although substantially all credited rates on non-multi-year rate guaranteed SPDAs and FPDAs may be changed annually, subject to minimum guarantees, changes in crediting rates may not be sufficient to maintain targeted investment spreads in all economic and market environments. In addition, competition and other factors, including the potential for increases in surrenders and withdrawals, may limit our ability to adjust or to maintain crediting rates at levels necessary to avoid narrowing of

Page 6 of 46

spreads under certain market conditions. For the year ended December 31, 2004, the weighted average yield, computed on the average amortized cost basis of our investment portfolio, was 6.28%; the weighted average cost of our liabilities at December 31, 2004, excluding interest bonuses guaranteed for the first year of the annuity contract, was 3.90%.

        We manage the indexed-based risk component of our index annuities by purchasing call options on the applicable indices to fund the annual index credits on these annuities and by adjusting the participation rates, asset fee rates and other product features to reflect the change in the cost of such options (which varies based on market conditions). All of such options are purchased to fund the index credits on our index annuities at their respective anniversary dates, and new options are purchased at each of the anniversary dates to fund the next annual index credits.

        For additional information regarding the composition of our investment portfolio and our interest rate risk management, see Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk and note 3 to our audited consolidated financial statements.

Marketing

        We market our products through a variable cost brokerage distribution network of approximately 70 national marketing organizations and 46,000 independent agents as of December 31, 2004. We emphasize high quality service to our agents and policyholders along with the prompt payment of commissions to our agents. We believe this has been significant in building excellent relationships with our existing agency force.

        Our independent agents and agencies range in profile from national sales organizations to personal producing general agents. We aggressively recruit new agents and expect to continue to expand our independent agency force. In our recruitment efforts, we emphasize that agents have direct access to our executive officers, giving us an edge in recruiting over larger and foreign-owned competitors. We also have favorable relationships with our national marketing organizations, which have enabled us to efficiently sell through an expanded number of independent agents. We are currently licensed to sell our products in 48 states and the District of Columbia. We have applied for licenses to sell our products in the two remaining states.

        The insurance distribution system is comprised of insurance brokers and marketing organizations. We are pursuing a strategy to increase the size of our distribution network by developing additional relationships with national and regional marketing organizations. These organizations typically recruit agents for us by advertising our products and our commission structure, through direct mail advertising, or through seminars for insurance agents and brokers. These organizations bear most of the cost incurred in marketing our products. We compensate marketing organizations by paying them a percentage of the commissions earned on new annuity policy sales generated by the agents recruited in such organizations. We also conduct incentive programs for marketing organizations and agents from time to time, including equity-based programs for our leading national marketers. For additional information regarding our equity-based programs for our leading national marketers see note 10 to our audited consolidated financial statements. We generally do not enter into exclusive arrangements with these marketing organizations.

        Two of our national marketing organizations each accounted for more than 10% of the annuity deposits and insurance premiums collections during the year ended December 31, 2004. The states with the largest share of direct premiums collected during 2004 were: Florida (11.7%), California (10.7%), Texas (8.6%), Illinois (7.2%) and Michigan (5.2%).

Page 7 of 46

Competition and Ratings

        We operate in a highly competitive industry. Many of our competitors are substantially larger and enjoy substantially greater financial resources, higher ratings by rating agencies, broader and more diversified product lines and more widespread agency relationships. Our annuity products compete with index, fixed rate and variable annuities sold by other insurance companies and also with mutual fund products, traditional bank investments and other investment and retirement funding alternatives offered by asset managers, banks, and broker-dealers. Our insurance products compete with other insurance companies, financial intermediaries and other institutions based on a number of features, including crediting rates, policy terms and conditions, service provided to distribution channels and policyholders, ratings, reputation and broker compensation.

        The sales agents for our products use the ratings assigned to an insurer by independent rating agencies as one factor in determining which insurer's annuity to market. In recent years, the market for annuities has been dominated by those insurers with the highest ratings. American Equity Life has received a financial strength rating of "B++" (Very Good) with a stable outlook from A.M. Best Company and "BBB+" with a stable outlook from Standard & Poor's. A.M. Best Company and Standard & Poor's changed their outlook on our rating from negative to stable subsequent to the completion of our December 2003 initial public offering. In July, 2002, A.M. Best Company and Standard & Poor's adjusted our financial strength ratings from "A-"(Excellent) to "B++"(Very Good) and "A-" to "BBB+", respectively. The adjustments initially had no impact on sales of new annuity products or in lapses of existing balances. Beginning in November, 2002, our monthly sales volumes began to decline primarily as a result of certain actions by us, including reductions in crediting rates and suspension of new sales of some products. The degree to which ratings adjustments also contributed to this decline is unknown. Our ability to grow sales of new annuities and the level of surrenders of our existing annuity contracts in force during 2005 may be affected by the current ratings.

        Financial strength ratings generally involve quantitative and qualitative evaluations by rating agencies of a company's financial condition and operating performance. Generally, rating agencies base their ratings upon information furnished to them by the insurer and upon their own investigations, studies and assumptions. Ratings are based upon factors of concern to policyholders, agents and intermediaries and are not directed toward the protection of investors and are not recommendations to buy, sell or hold securities.

        A.M. Best Company ratings currently range from "A++" (Superior) to "F" (In Liquidation), and include 16 separate ratings categories. Within these categories, "A++" (Superior) and "A+" (Superior) are the highest, followed by "A" (Excellent) and "A-" (Excellent) then followed by "B++" (Very Good) and "B+" (Very Good). Publications of A.M. Best Company indicate that the "B++" rating is assigned to those companies that, in A.M. Best Company's opinion, have demonstrated a good ability to meet their ongoing obligations to policyholders.

        Standard & Poor's insurer financial strength ratings currently range from "AAA" to "NR", and include 21 separate ratings categories. Within these categories, "AAA" and "AA" are the highest, followed by "A" and "BBB". Publications of Standard & Poor's indicate that an insurer rated "BBB" or higher is regarded as having strong financial security characteristics, but is somewhat more likely to be affected by adverse business conditions than are higher rated insurers.

        A.M. Best Company and Standard & Poor's review their ratings of insurance companies from time to time. There can be no assurance that any particular rating will continue for any given period of time or that it will not be changed or withdrawn entirely if, in their judgment, circumstances so warrant. If our ratings were to be adjusted again for any reason, we could experience a material decline in the sales of our products and the persistency of our existing business.

Page 8 of 46

Reinsurance

Coinsurance

        American Equity Life has entered into two coinsurance agreements with EquiTrust Life Insurance Company ("EquiTrust"), an affiliate of Farm Bureau Life Insurance Company ("Farm Bureau"), covering 70% of certain of our fixed rate and index annuities issued from August 1, 2001 through December 31, 2001, 40% of those contracts issued during 2002 and 2003, and 20% of those contracts issued from January 1, 2004 to July 31, 2004, when the agreement was suspended by mutual consent of the parties. As a result of the suspension, new business will no longer be ceded to EquiTrust unless and until the parties mutually agree to resume the coinsurance of new business. The business reinsured under these agreements is not eligible for recapture before the expiration of 10 years. EquiTrust has received a financial strength rating of "A" from A.M. Best Company. As of December 31, 2004, Farm Bureau beneficially owned 14.4% of our issued and outstanding common stock.

        Total annuity deposits ceded were $202.1 million, $649.4 million and $837.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. We received expense allowances of $22.6 million, $65.6 million and $99.4 million under this agreement for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The balance due under this agreement to EquiTrust was $32.0 million at December 31, 2004 and $22.6 million at December 31, 2003, and represents the market value of the call options related to the ceded business held by us to fund the index credits and cash due to or from EquiTrust related to the transfer of ceded annuity deposits. At December 31, 2004 and 2003, the aggregate policy benefit reserves transferred to EquiTrust under these agreements were $2.1 billion and $1.9 billion, respectively. We remain liable with respect to the policy liabilities ceded to EquiTrust should it fail to meet the obligations assumed by it.

        American Equity Life has also entered into a modified coinsurance agreement to cede 70% of its variable annuity business to EquiTrust. Separate account deposits ceded under this agreement during the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 were immaterial. Under this agreement and related administrative services agreements, we paid EquiTrust $0.2 million for the each of years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002. The modified coinsurance agreement will continue until termination by written notice at the election of either party. Any such termination will apply to the submission or acceptance of new policies, and business reinsured under the agreement prior to any such termination is not eligible for recapture before the expiration of 10 years.

Financial Reinsurance

        American Equity Life has entered into two reinsurance transactions with Hannover Life Reassurance Company of America, ("Hannover"), which are treated as reinsurance under statutory accounting practices and as financial reinsurance under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, ("GAAP"). Hannover has received a financial strength rating of "A+" from A.M. Best Company. The first transaction became effective November 1, 2002 (the "2002 Hannover Transaction") and the second transaction became effective September 30, 2003 (the "2003 Hannover Transaction"). The agreements for these transactions include a coinsurance segment and a yearly renewable term segment reinsuring a portion of death benefits payable on certain annuities issued from January 1, 2002 to December 31, 2002 (2002 Hannover Transaction) and issued from January 1, 2003 to September 30, 2003 (2003 Hannover Transaction). The coinsurance segments provide reinsurance to the extent of 6.88% (2002 Hannover Transaction) and 13.41% (2003 Hannover Transaction) of all risks associated with our annuity policies covered by these reinsurance agreements. The 2002 Hannover Transaction provided $29.8 million in net statutory surplus benefit during 2002 and the 2003 Hannover Transaction provided $29.7 million in net statutory surplus benefit during 2003. The statutory surplus benefits provided by these agreements were reduced by $13.1 million in 2004 and $6.8 million in 2003. The remaining statutory surplus benefit under these agreements will be reduced in the following years as follows: 2005—$11.6 million; 2006—$12.4 million; 2007—$13.2 million; 2008—$6.2 million. Risk charges

Page 9 of 46

attributable to the 2003 and 2002 Hannover Transactions of $2.2 million, $1.6 million and $0.2 million were incurred during 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

        The statutory surplus benefit provided by the 2003 Hannover Transaction replaced the statutory surplus benefit previously provided by a financial reinsurance agreement with a subsidiary of Swiss Reinsurance Company. We terminated this agreement and recaptured all reserves subject to this agreement effective September 30, 2003. This agreement was effective January 1, 2001, and provided an initial statutory surplus benefit of $35.0 million in 2001. The statutory surplus benefit remaining at January 1, 2003 was $30.9 million, all of which was eliminated during 2003. Risk charges and interest expense incurred on the cash portion of the surplus benefit provided by the agreement were $0.2 million and $0.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

Indemnity Reinsurance

        Consistent with the general practice of the life insurance industry, American Equity Life enters into agreements of indemnity reinsurance with other insurance companies in order to reinsure portions of the coverage provided by its life and accident and health insurance products. Indemnity reinsurance agreements are intended to limit a life insurer's maximum loss on a large or unusually hazardous risk or to diversify its risks. The maximum loss retained by us on all life insurance policies we have issued was $0.1 million or less as of December 31, 2004. Indemnity reinsurance does not discharge the original insurer's primary liability to the insured. American Equity Life's reinsured business related to these blocks of business is primarily ceded to two reinsurers. Reinsurance related to life and accident and health insurance that was ceded by us primarily to two reinsurers was immaterial. We believe the assuming companies will be able to honor all contractual commitments, based on our periodic review of their financial statements, insurance industry reports and reports filed with state insurance departments.

Regulation

        Life insurance companies are subject to regulation and supervision by the states in which they transact business. State insurance laws establish supervisory agencies with broad regulatory authority, including the power to:

•

grant and revoke licenses to transact business;



•

regulate and supervise trade practices and market conduct;



•

establish guaranty associations;



•

license agents;



•

approve policy forms;



•

approve premium rates for some lines of business;



•

establish reserve requirements;



•

prescribe the form and content of required financial statements and reports;



•

determine the reasonableness and adequacy of statutory capital and surplus;



•

perform financial, market conduct and other examinations;



•

define acceptable accounting principles;



•

regulate the type and amount of permitted investments;



•

limit the amount of dividends and surplus note payments that can be paid without obtaining regulatory approval.

        Our life subsidiaries are subject to periodic examinations by state regulatory authorities. In 2002, the Iowa Insurance Division completed an examination of American Equity Life as of December 31,

Page 10 of 46

2000. No adjustments to our financial statements were recommended or required as a result of this examination. The Iowa Insurance Division is currently conducting an examination of American Equity Life as of December 31, 2003. We have not been informed of any material adjustments which will be recommended or required as a result of this examination.

        The payment of dividends or the distributions, including surplus note payments, by our life subsidiaries is subject to regulation by each subsidiary's state of domicile's insurance department. Currently, American Equity Life may pay dividends or make other distributions without the prior approval of its state of domicile's insurance department, unless such payments, together with all other such payments within the preceding twelve months, exceed the greater of (1) American Equity Life's statutory net gain from operations for the preceding calendar year, or (2) 10% of American Equity Life's statutory surplus at the preceding December 31. For 2005, up to approximately $60.9 million can be distributed as dividends by American Equity Life without prior approval of its state of domicile's insurance department. In addition, dividends and surplus note payments may be made only out of earned surplus, and all surplus note payments are subject to prior approval by regulatory authorities. American Equity Life had approximately $114.6 million of earned surplus at December 31, 2004.

        Most states have also enacted regulations on the activities of insurance holding company systems, including acquisitions, extraordinary dividends, the terms of surplus notes, the terms of affiliate transactions and other related matters. We are registered pursuant to such legislation in Iowa. Recently, a number of state legislatures have considered or have enacted legislative proposals that alter and, in many cases, increase the authority of state agencies to regulate insurance companies and holding company systems.

        Most states, including Iowa and New York where our life subsidiaries are domiciled, have enacted legislation or adopted administrative regulations affecting the acquisition of control of insurance companies as well as transactions between insurance companies and persons controlling them. The nature and extent of such legislation and regulations currently in effect vary from state to state. However, most states require administrative approval of the direct or indirect acquisition of 10% or more of the outstanding voting securities of an insurance company incorporated in the state. The acquisition of 10% of such securities is generally deemed to be the acquisition of "control" for the purpose of the holding company statutes and requires not only the filing of detailed information concerning the acquiring parties and the plan of acquisition, but also administrative approval prior to the acquisition. In many states, the insurance authority may find that "control" in fact does not exist in circumstances in which a person owns or controls more than 10% of the voting securities.

        Although the federal government does not directly regulate the business of insurance, federal legislation and administrative policies in several areas, including pension regulation, age and sex discrimination, financial services regulation, securities regulation and federal taxation can significantly affect the insurance business. In addition, legislation has been passed which could result in the federal government assuming some role in regulating insurance companies and which allows combinations between insurance companies, banks and other entities.

        In 1998, the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") requested comments as to whether index annuities, such as those sold by us, should be treated as securities under the federal securities laws rather than as insurance products. Treatment of these products as securities would likely require additional registration and licensing of these products and the agents selling them, as well as cause us to seek additional marketing relationships for these products. No action has been taken by the SEC on this issue.

        State insurance regulators and the National Association of Insurance Commissioners, or NAIC, are continually reexamining existing laws and regulations and developing new legislation for the passage by state legislatures and new regulations for adoption by insurance authorities. Proposed laws and

Page 11 of 46

regulations or those still under development pertain to insurer solvency and market conduct and in recent years have focused on:

•

insurance company investments;



•

risk-based capital ("RBC") guidelines, which consist of regulatory targeted surplus levels based on the relationship of statutory capital and surplus, with prescribed adjustments, to the sum of stated percentages of each element of a specified list of company risk exposures;



•

the implementation of non-statutory guidelines and the circumstances under which dividends may be paid;



•

product approvals;



•

agent licensing;



•

underwriting practices;



•

insurance and annuity sales practices.

        The NAIC's RBC requirements are intended to be used by insurance regulators as an early warning tool to identify deteriorating or weakly capitalized insurance companies for the purpose of initiating regulatory action. The RBC formula defines a new minimum capital standard which supplements low, fixed minimum capital and surplus requirements previously implemented on a state-by-state basis. Such requirements are not designed as a ranking mechanism for adequately capitalized companies.

        The NAIC's RBC requirements provide for four levels of regulatory attention depending on the ratio of a company's total adjusted capital to its RBC. Adjusted capital is defined as the total of statutory capital, surplus, asset valuation reserve and certain other adjustments. Calculations using the NAIC formula at December 31, 2004, indicate that the ratio of total adjusted capital to RBC for us exceeded the highest level at which regulatory action might be initiated by approximately 2.5 times.

        Our life subsidiaries also may be required, under the solvency or guaranty laws of most states in which they do business, to pay assessments up to certain prescribed limits to fund policyholder losses or liabilities of insolvent insurance companies. These assessments may be deferred or forgiven under most guaranty laws if they would threaten an insurer's financial strength and, in certain instances, may be offset against future premium taxes. Assessments related to business reinsured for periods prior to the effective date of the reinsurance are the responsibility of the ceding companies.

Federal Income Taxation

        The annuity and life insurance products that we market generally provide the policyholder with a federal income tax advantage, as compared to certain other savings investments such as certificates of deposit and taxable bonds, in that federal income taxation on any increases in the contract values (i.e., the "inside build-up") of these products is deferred until it is received by the policyholder. With other savings investments, the increase in value is generally taxed each year as it is realized. Additionally, life insurance death benefits are generally exempt from income tax.

        From time to time, various tax law changes have been proposed that could have an adverse effect on our business, including the elimination of all or a portion of the income tax advantage described above for annuities and life insurance. If legislation were enacted to eliminate the tax deferral for annuities, such a change would have an adverse effect on our ability to sell non-qualified annuities. Non-qualified annuities are annuities that are not sold to an individual retirement account or other qualified retirement plan.

        In June 2001, the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 (the "2001 Act") was enacted. The 2001 Act implemented a staged decrease in individual tax rates that began in 2001 and was accelerated when the Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003 (the "2003 Act")

Page 12 of 46

was enacted. While the decreases in rates are temporary (the pre-2001 rates will return in 2011), the present value of the tax deferred advantage of annuities and life insurance products is less, which might hinder our ability to sell such products and/or increase the rate at which our current policyholders surrender their policies.

        Our life subsidiaries are taxed under the life insurance company provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"). Provisions in the Code require a portion of the expenses incurred in selling insurance products to be capitalized and deducted over a period of years, as opposed to being immediately deducted in the year incurred. This provision increases the current income tax expense charged to gain from operations for statutory accounting purposes which reduces statutory net income and surplus and, accordingly, may decrease the amount of cash dividends that may be paid by our life subsidiaries.

Employees

        As of December 31, 2004, we had approximately 230 full-time employees, of which approximately 220 are located in West Des Moines, Iowa, and 10 are located in the Pell City, Alabama office. We have experienced no work stoppages or strikes and consider our relations with our employees to be excellent. None of our employees are represented by a union.

ITEM 2.    PROPERTIES

        We do not own any real estate. We lease space for our principal offices in West Des Moines, Iowa, pursuant to written leases for approximately 45,000 square feet. The leases expire on June 30, 2006 and have a renewal option for an additional five year term at a rental rate equal to the prevailing fair market rate. We also lease space for our office in Pell City, Alabama, pursuant to a written lease dated January 3, 2000, for approximately 5,680 square feet. This lease is currently on a month-to-month basis.

ITEM 3.    LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

        We are occasionally involved in litigation, both as a defendant and as a plaintiff. In addition, state regulatory bodies, such as state insurance departments, the SEC, the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., the Department of Labor, and other regulatory bodies regularly make inquiries and conduct examinations or investigations concerning our compliance with, among other things, insurance laws, securities laws, the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended and laws governing the activities of broker-dealers.

        Companies in the life insurance and annuity business have faced litigation, including class action lawsuits, alleging improper product design, improper sales practices and similar claims. We are currently a defendant in several purported class action lawsuits filed in state courts alleging improper sales practices. In these lawsuits, the plaintiffs are seeking returns of premiums and other compensatory and punitive damages. We have reached a final settlement in one of these cases, the impact of which is expected to be immaterial. The class was certified as such incident to the settlement of that case. No class has been certified in any of the other pending cases at this time. Although we have denied all allegations in these lawsuits and intend to vigorously defend against them, the lawsuits are in the early stages of litigation and neither their outcomes nor a range of possible outcomes can be determined at this time. However, we do not believe that these lawsuits will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

        In addition, we are from time to time, subject to other legal proceedings and claims in the ordinary course of business, none of which we believe are likely to have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. There can be no assurance that such litigation, or any future litigation, will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

ITEM 4.    SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

        None.

Page 13 of 46

PART II

ITEM 5.    MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

        Our common stock began trading on the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") under the symbol "AEL" following our initial public offering ("IPO").

        As of December 31, 2004, the Company had 38,360,343 shares issued and outstanding and approximately 4,500 shareholders of record. In 2004 and 2003, we paid an annual cash dividend of $0.02 and $0.01, respectively, per share on our common stock. We intend to continue to pay an annual cash dividend on such shares so long as we have sufficient capital and/or future earnings to do so. However, we anticipate retaining most of our future earnings, if any, for use in our operations and the expansion of our business. Any further determination as to dividend policy will be made by our board of directors and will depend on a number of factors, including our future earnings, capital requirements, financial condition and future prospects and such other factors as our board of directors may deem relevant.

        Our credit agreement limits our ability to declare or pay dividends in any fiscal year to 33% of our consolidated net income for the prior year. In addition, since we are a holding company, our ability to pay cash dividends depends in large measure on our subsidiaries' ability to make distributions of cash or property to us. Iowa insurance laws restrict the amount of distributions American Equity Life can pay to us without the approval of the Iowa Insurance Division. See Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and notes 7 and 11 to our audited consolidated financial statements.

        On December 9, 2003, we completed an initial public offering of 18,700,000 shares of our common stock at a price of $9.00 per share. The managing underwriters for the offering were Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Advest, Inc., Raymond James & Associates, Inc. and Sanders Morris Harris Inc. The shares of common stock sold in the offering were registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, on a Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-108794) that was declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 3, 2003. Pursuant to the over-allotment option granted to the underwriters in the offering, the underwriters purchased an additional 2,000,000 shares on December 29, 2003 and an additional 805,000 shares on January 7, 2004, which fully exercised the over-allotment option. The offering did not terminate until after the sale of all of the securities registered on the Registration Statement. The aggregate gross proceeds to us from our initial public offering were approximately $193.5 million. The aggregate net proceeds to us from the offering were approximately $178.0 million, after deducting an aggregate of approximately $13.5 million in underwriting discounts and commissions paid to the underwriters and an estimated $2.0 million in other expenses incurred in connection with the offering. In connection with the IPO, we did not make any payments, directly or indirectly, to any of our directors or officers, or, to our knowledge, any of their associates, or to any person owning ten percent

Page 14 of 46

or more of any class of our equity securities, or to any of our affiliates. All of the net proceeds were contributed to our life subsidiaries to fund future growth of our annuity business.

        There were no sales of unregistered equity securities during 2004 not previously reported on Form 8-K.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

        We did not have any issuer purchases of equity securities for the quarter ended December 31, 2004.

Page 15 of 46

ITEM 6.    SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATA

        The summary consolidated financial and other data should be read in conjunction with Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and our consolidated financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this report. The results for past periods are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for future periods.

Page 16 of 46

(a)

The accounting change resulted from the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, which became effective on January 1, 2001.

(b)

Effective December 31, 2003, we adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an Interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51. See note 1 to our audited consolidated financial statements.

(c)

Our GAAP net income and statutory net loss in 2001, were affected by a decision to maintain a significant liquid investment position after the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.

(d)

Book value per share is calculated as total stockholders' equity less the liquidation preference of our series preferred stock dividend by the total number of shares of common stock outstanding.

(e)

We define return on equity as net income divided by average total stockholders' equity. Average total stockholders' equity is determined based upon the total stockholders' equity at the beginning and the end of the year. The computation of average stockholders' equity for 2003 has been modified to recognize the significant increase in stockholders' equity that resulted from the receipt of the net proceeds from our initial public offering in December 2003.

Page 17 of 46

ITEM 7.    MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

        Management's discussion and analysis reviews our consolidated financial position at December 31, 2004 and 2003, and our consolidated results of operations for the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004, and where appropriate, factors that may affect future financial performance. This discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements, notes thereto and selected consolidated financial data appearing elsewhere in this report.

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information

        All statements, trend analyses and other information contained in this report and elsewhere (such as in filings by us with the Securities and Exchange Commission, press releases, presentations by us or our management or oral statements) relative to markets for our products and trends in our operations or financial results, as well as other statements including words such as "anticipate", "believe", "plan", "estimate", "expect", "intend", and other similar expressions, constitute forward-looking statements. We caution that these statements may and often do vary from actual results and the differences between these statements and actual results can be material. Accordingly, we cannot assure you that actual results will not differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Factors that could contribute to these differences include, among other things:

•

general economic conditions and other factors, including prevailing interest rate levels and stock and credit market performance which may affect (among other things) our ability to sell our products, our ability to access capital resources and the costs associated therewith, the market value of our investments and the lapse rate and profitability of our policies;



•

customer response to new products and marketing initiatives;



•

changes in the Federal income tax laws and regulations which may affect the relative income tax advantages of our products;



•

increasing competition in the sale of annuities;



•

regulatory changes or actions, including those relating to regulation of financial services affecting (among other things) bank sales and underwriting of insurance products and regulation of the sale, underwriting and pricing of products;



•

the risk factors or uncertainties listed from time to time in our private placement memorandums or filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Overview

        We specialize in the sale of individual annuities (primarily deferred annuities) and, to a lesser extent, we also sell life insurance policies. Under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, or GAAP, premium collections for deferred annuities are reported as deposit liabilities instead of as revenues. Sources of revenues for products accounted for as deposit liabilities are net investment income, surrender charges deducted from the account balances of policyholders in connection with withdrawals, realized gains and losses on investments and changes in fair value of derivatives. Components of expenses for products accounted for as deposit liabilities are interest credited to account balances, changes in fair value of embedded derivatives, amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and deferred sales inducements, other operating costs and expenses and income taxes.

        Earnings from products accounted for as deposit liabilities are primarily generated from the excess of net investment income earned over the interest credited to the policyholder, or the "investment spread". In the case of index annuities, the investment spread consists of net investment income in

Page 18 of 46

excess of the cost of the options purchased to fund the index-based component of the policyholder's return and amounts credited as a result of minimum guarantees.

        Our investment spread is summarized as follows:

        The average crediting rates and investment spreads are computed without the impact of amortization of deferred sales inducements. See Critical Accounting Policies—Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs and Deferred Sales Inducements. With respect to our index annuities, the cost of money includes the average crediting rate on amounts allocated to the fixed rate options, expenses we incur to fund the annual income credits and minimum guaranteed interest credited on the index business. Proceeds received upon expiration or early termination of call options purchased to fund annual index credits are recorded as part of the change in fair value of derivatives, and are largely offset by an expense for interest credited to annuity policyholder account balances. See Critical Accounting Policies—Derivative Instruments—Index Products.

        Our profitability depends in large part upon the amount of assets under our management, investment spreads we earn on our policyholders' account balances, our ability to manage our investment portfolio to maximize returns and minimize risks such as interest rate changes, defaults or impairment of assets, our ability to manage costs of the options purchased to fund the annual index credits on our index annuities, our ability to manage the costs of acquiring new business (principally commissions to agents and first year bonuses credited to policyholders) and our ability to manage our operating expenses.

Critical Accounting Policies

        The increasing complexity of the business environment and applicable authoritative accounting guidance require us to closely monitor our accounting policies. We have identified four critical accounting policies that are complex and require significant judgment. The following summary of our critical accounting policies is intended to enhance your ability to assess our financial condition and results of operations and the potential volatility due to changes in estimates.

Valuation of Investments

        Our fixed maturity securities (bonds and redeemable preferred stocks maturing more than one year after issuance) and equity securities (common and non-redeemable preferred stocks) classified as available for sale are reported at estimated fair value. Unrealized gains and losses, if any, on these

Page 19 of 46

securities are included directly in a separate component of stockholders' equity, net of income taxes and certain adjustments for assumed changes in amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and deferred sales inducements. Fair values for securities that are actively traded are determined using quoted market prices. For fixed maturity securities that are not actively traded, fair values are estimated using price matrices developed using yield data and other factors relating to instruments or securities with similar characteristics. The carrying amounts of all our investments are reviewed on an ongoing basis for credit deterioration. If this review indicates a decline in market value that is other than temporary, our carrying amount in the investment is reduced to its fair value and a specific writedown is taken. Such reductions in carrying amount are recognized as realized losses and charged to earnings.

        Our periodic assessment of our ability to recover the amortized cost basis of investments that have materially lower quoted market prices requires a high degree of management judgment and involves uncertainty. Factors considered in evaluating whether a decline in value is other than temporary include:

•

the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost;



•

the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer;



•

whether the investment is rated investment grade;



•

whether the issuer is current on all payments and all contractual payments have been made as agreed;



•

our intent and ability to retain the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery;



•

consideration of rating agency actions;



•

changes in cash flows of asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities.

        In addition, for securities expected to be sold, an other than temporary impairment charge is recognized if we do not expect the fair value of a security to recover to cost or amortized cost prior to the expected date of sale. Once an impairment charge has been recorded, we then continue to review the other than temporarily impaired securities for appropriate valuation on an ongoing basis. Realized losses through a charge to earnings may be recognized in future periods should we later conclude that the decline in market value below amortized cost is other than temporary pursuant to our accounting policy described above.

Page 20 of 46

        At December 31, 2004 and 2003, the amortized cost and estimated fair value of fixed maturity securities and equity securities that were in an unrealized loss position were as follows:

        The amortized cost and estimated fair value of fixed maturity securities at December 31, 2004 and 2003, by contractual maturity, that were in an unrealized loss position are shown below. Actual maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. All of our mortgage-backed and asset-

Page 21 of 46

backed securities provide for periodic payments throughout their lives, and are shown below as a separate line.

        See Financial Condition—Investments for significant concentrations in the investment portfolio.

        At December 31, 2004 and 2003, the fair value of investments we owned that were non-investment grade or not rated was $63.9 million and $91.5 million, respectively. Non-investment grade or not rated securities represented 0.8% and 1.7% at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, of the fair value of our fixed maturity securities. The unrealized losses on investments we owned that were non-investment grade or not rated at December 31, 2004 and 2003, were $10.2 million and $10.8 million, respectively. The unrealized losses on such securities at December 31, 2004 and 2003 represented 5.7% and 4.9%, respectively, of gross unrealized losses on fixed maturity securities

        At December 31, 2004, we identified certain invested assets which have characteristics (i.e. significant unrealized losses compared to book value and industry trends) creating uncertainty as to our future assessment of other than temporary impairments. This list is referred to as our watch list. We have excluded from this list securities with unrealized losses which are related to market movements in interest rates and which have no factors indicating that such unrealized losses may be other than temporary. We have reviewed these investments and concluded that there were no other than temporary impairments on these investments at December 31, 2004.

        At December 31, 2004, the amortized cost and estimated fair value of each fixed maturity security on the watch list are as follows:

Page 22 of 46

        Our analysis of these securities and their credit performance at December 31, 2004 is as follows:

Continental Airlines Pass Thru Certificates 2001-001 Class B are backed by the general credit of Continental Airlines as well as the collateral from a pool of airplanes. We determined that an other than temporary impairment charge was not necessary for the following reasons: (i) we believed that Continental Airlines' improving liquidity reduced the likelihood of bankruptcy and (ii) even if Continental Airlines were to declare bankruptcy, the chance of full recovery on this security was high due to the excess collateral coverage supplied by the aircraft collateral.

Land O' Lakes is a national, farmer-owned food and agricultural cooperative. We determined that an other than temporary impairment charge was not necessary for the following reasons: (i) Land O' Lakes operates in a cyclical industry and had successfully managed through previous cyclical lows; (ii) we calculated that Land O' Lakes had adequate EBITDA to interest coverage of bank debt and 4.51 times for bond debt and determined that Land O' Lakes had adequate liquidity; (iii) Land O' Lakes was in the process of improving its balance sheet by maintaining liquidity and selling non-strategic assets and investments; and (iv) further improvements were expected in the future.

Northwest Airlines Pass Thru Certificates 1999-1 Class C are backed by the general credit of Northwest Airlines as well as the collateral from a pool of airplanes. We determined that an other than temporary impairment charge was not necessary for the following reasons: (i) we believed that a bankruptcy was unlikely since Northwest had begun to see benefits from its attempts to return to profitability; (ii) we believed Northwest had adequate liquidity; (iii) we calculated Northwest to have unrestricted cash at the end of the third quarter of 2004 of approximately $2.5 billion; (iv) even if Northwest declared bankruptcy, these bonds would have remained current for at least 18 months due to a liquidity coverage feature and the bonds could remain current after 18 months if Northwest affirmed the leases on the planes in the collateral pool in the unlikely event of a bankruptcy; and (v) based upon the liquidity of Northwest ($2.5 billion at September 30, 2004).

Pegasus Aviation 1999-1A C1 is backed by leases on airplanes and is structured as a pass-through security. We took an impairment charge of $1.9 million on this security in the fourth quarter of 2001 because we did not expect to receive further principal payments. However, due to the continued problems in the leased airplane industry, the market value of this security had declined further. We determined that no additional other than temporary impairment change was necessary for the following reasons: (i) although we did not expect to receive principal payments on this security, we expected that interest payments would continue to be made until 2019 and (ii) the value of the expected future interest payments supported the current book value.

        Each of the four securities on the watch list is current in respect to payments of principal and interest. We have concluded for each of the four securities on the watch list that we have the intent and the ability to hold these securities for a period of time sufficient to allow for a recovery in fair value.

        We took writedowns on certain other investments that we concluded did have an other than temporary impairment during 2004, 2003 and 2002 of $12.8 million, $9.8 million and $13.0 million, respectively. Following is a discussion of each security for which we have taken write downs during the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002.

We owned the Class A3-A Tranche of the Juniper collateralized bond obligation. We wrote down this security by $2.0 million to its fair value in the first quarter of 2002. Due to the structure of payments from the collateralized bond obligation, it was likely that we would continue receiving interest payments for the foreseeable future, but it was unlikely that we would receive our entire

Page 23 of 46

principal at maturity. The fair value of this security continued to decline in subsequent months and we sold the bond at an additional loss of $0.5 million in the second quarter of 2003.

Pegasus 2001-1A C2 is an asset-backed security backed by leases on 41 specific aircraft. We wrote down this security by $3.0 million in the third quarter of 2002. The downturn in the airline industry had caused lease rates on renewing leases to be significantly below expectations and this was exacerbated by the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001. Due to the continuing problems in the airline industry and continued lower lease rates on renewing leases, we took an additional write down of $2.9 million on this security in the first quarter of 2003.

Jet Equipment Trust is an asset-backed security backed by collateral from a pool of planes and the general credit of United Airlines. We wrote down this security by $6.4 million in the third quarter of 2002. The downturn in the airline industry and the possibility of United Airlines declaring bankruptcy had caused this security to trade significantly below cost at the time of the original write down. United Airlines declared bankruptcy in the fourth quarter of 2002 and discontinued making lease payments on the planes that support this trust. Due to the fact that any further payments on this security were unlikely, we took an additional write down of $1.6 million in the fourth quarter of 2002 to reduce the book value to zero.

Oakwood Mortgage 1999-E Class M2 is an asset-backed security backed by installment sales contracts secured by manufactured homes and liens on real estate. We wrote down this security by $4.2 million in the third quarter of 2003 due to continuing high default rates for the manufactured housing industry causing doubt about the return of the entire principal balance. We wrote this security down by an additional $2.7 million during the fourth quarter of 2003 due to further deterioration in default rates.

Oakwood Mortgage 2000-C Class M1 is backed by installment sales contracts secured by manufactured homes and liens on real estate. We wrote this security down by $7.6 million in the first quarter of 2004 due to an increase in default rates and realized losses above expected levels along with a downgrade to below investment grade on March 8, 2004. We took an additional writedown on this security of $3.7 million in the third quarter of 2004 due to continued deterioration in default rates.

Diversified Asset Securities II Class B-1 is a pool of asset-backed securities that entitle the holders thereof to receive payments that depend primarily on the cash flow from a specified pool of financial assets. We wrote this security down by $1.5 million during the second quarter of 2004 based upon the deterioration of the underlying collateral along with a downgrade to below investment grade on June 2, 2004. We sold this security for an immaterial loss during the fourth quarter of 2004.

        In making the decisions to write down the securities described above, we considered whether the factors leading to those write downs impacted any other securities held in our portfolio. In cases where we determined that a decline in value was related to an industry-wide concern, we considered the impact of such concern on all securities we held within that industry classification.

Page 24 of 46

        Below is a list of securities which we have sold at a loss excluding losses arising from interest rate changes and losses deemed immaterial. There were no material realized losses on the sales of securities during 2004.

        Generally, for each of these sales there was an unexpected event resulting in a decline in credit quality which occurred shortly before the sale. This led to the decision to sell a security at a loss concurrent with the decision that an initial or additional impairment charge was required. Accordingly, in all cases, this did not contradict our previous assertion that we had the ability and intent to hold the security until recovery in value. Each of these securities and the factors resulting in the sales of such securities are discussed individually below.

Transamerica Capital was sold to reduce our exposure to European insurance companies and not as a result of deteriorating credit quality.

Calpine Canada was sold because it engaged in re-financing activities that threatened its long term profitability and exacerbated its reliance on leverage. The wholesale power market in which it was engaged was expected to be weak.

American Airlines pass thru certificates, which were collateralized by a pool of airplanes, were sold as a result of inadequate collateral coverage in a potential bankruptcy situation and recent changes regarding the airline's bank covenants regarding required minimum unrestricted cash balances.

Ford Motor Co. was determined to be an improving credit, however we decided to reduce our position in this security to $10.0 million by selling $5.0 million principal amount of these securities at a loss of $0.4 million.

Juniper was a collateralized debt obligation backed by corporate debt obligations rated primarily below investment grade. In the first quarter of 2002, we wrote this security down as a result of downgrades and significant deterioration in the value of the underlying corporate debt. Continued deterioration led us to sell the security in 2003.

Qwest was sold as the result of several factors, including its rapidly deteriorating operating environment, the sale of one of its business units for a value well below expectations and continuing government investigations.

Derivative Instruments—Index Products

        We offer a variety of index annuities with crediting strategies linked to several equity market indices, including the S&P 500, the Dow Jones Industrial Average and the NASDAQ 100. Several of these products also offer a bond strategy linked to the Lehman Aggregate Bond Index or the Lehman U.S. Treasury Bond Index. These products allow policyholders to earn returns linked to equity or bond

Page 25 of 46

index appreciation without the risk of loss of their principal. Most of these products allow policyholders to transfer funds once a year among several different crediting strategies, including one or more of the index based strategies and a traditional fixed rate strategy. Substantially all of our index products require annual crediting of interest and an annual reset of the applicable index on the contract anniversary date. The computation of the annual index credit is based upon either a one year annual point-to-point calculation (i.e., the gain in the applicable index from one anniversary date to the next anniversary date), a monthly averaging of the index during the contract year, or a one year monthly point-to-point calculation (the net gain determined by adding the twelve monthly gains and losses in the applicable index within the one year period from one anniversary date to the next anniversary date).

        The annuity contract value is equal to the premiums paid plus annual index credits based upon a percentage, known as the "participation rate", of the annual appreciation (based in some instances on monthly averages or monthly point-to-point calculations) in a recognized index or benchmark. The participation rate, which we may reset annually, generally varies among the index products from 50% to 100%. Some of the products have an "asset fee" ranging from 1.5 to 5%, which is deducted from the interest to be credited. The asset fees may be adjusted annually by us, subject to stated limits. In addition, some products apply an overall limit, or "cap", ranging from 5% to 13%, on the amount of annual interest the policyholder may earn in any one contract year, and the applicable cap also may be adjusted annually subject to stated minimums. The minimum guaranteed contract values range from 80% to 100% of the premium collected plus interest credited on the minimum guaranteed contract value at an annual rate of 2% to 3.5%.

        We purchase one-year call options on the applicable indices as an investment to provide the income needed to fund the amount of the annual index credits on the index products. New one-year options are purchased at the outset of each contract year. We budget an amount to purchase the specific options needed to fund the annual index credits, and the cost of the options represents our cost of providing the credits. The amount we budget for the purchase of index call options is based on our interest spread targets and is comparable to the credited rates of interest we offer on fixed rate annuities. For example, if the yield on our invested assets is 6.25% and our targeted spread is 2.50%, we allocate up to 3.75% of the premium in the first year or account balance after the first year to the purchase of one-year call options. Participation rates, which define the policyholder's level of participation in index gains each year, are determined by option costs. For example, if, based on current market conditions, the amount allocated to the purchase of options is sufficient to purchase an option that will provide a return equal to 70% of the annual gain in the applicable index, we will set the policyholder's participation rate at 70%. We have the ability to modify participation rates each year when a new option is purchased. In general, if option costs increase, participation rates may be decreased, and if option costs decrease, participation rates may be increased. We purchase call options weekly based upon new and renewing index account values during the applicable week, and the purchases are made by category according to the particular products and indices applicable to the new or renewing account values. Any proceeds received on the options at the expiration of the one-year term fund the related index credits to the policyholders. If there is no gain in an index, the policyholder receives a zero index credit on the policy, and we incur no costs beyond the option cost, except in cases where the minimum guaranteed value of a contract exceeds its index value.

Page 26 of 46

        Market value changes associated with the call options are reported as an increase or decrease in revenues in our consolidated statements of income in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities". The risk associated with prospective purchases of future one-year options is the uncertainty of the cost, which will determine whether we are able to earn our spread on our index business. All our index products permit us to modify participation rates, asset fees or annual income caps at least once a year. This feature is comparable to our fixed rate annuities, which allow us to adjust crediting rates annually. By modifying our participation rates or other features, we can limit our costs of purchasing the related one-year call options, except in cases where contractual features would prevent further modifications. Based upon actuarial testing which we conduct as a part of the design of our index products and on an ongoing basis, we believe the risk that contractual features would prevent us from controlling option costs is not material.

        After the purchase of the one-year call options and payment of acquisition costs, we invest the balance of index premiums as a part of our general account invested assets. With respect to the index products, our investment spread is measured as the difference between the aggregate yield on the relevant portion of our invested assets, less the aggregate option costs and the costs associated with minimum guarantees. If the minimum guaranteed value of an index product exceeds the index value (computed on a cumulative basis over the life of the contract) then the general account earnings are available to satisfy the minimum guarantees. If there were little or no gains in the entire series of one-year options purchased over the expected life of an index annuity (typically 10 to 15 years), then we would incur expenses for credited interest over and above our option costs, causing our spread to tighten and reducing our profits or potentially resulting in losses on these products.

        Under SFAS No. 133, all derivative instruments (including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts) are recognized in the balance sheet at their fair values and changes in fair value are recognized immediately in earnings. This impacts the items of revenue and expense we report on our index business as follows:

•

We must mark to market the purchased call options we use to fund the annual index credits on our index annuities based upon quoted market prices from related counterparties. We record the change in fair value of these options as a component of our revenues. Included within the change in fair value of the options is an element reflecting the time value of the options, which initially is their purchase cost declining to zero at the end of their one-year lives. The change in fair value of derivatives also includes proceeds received at the expiration of the one year option terms and gains or losses recognized upon early termination.



•

Under SFAS No. 133, the future annual index credits on our index annuities are treated as a "series of embedded derivatives" over the expected life of the applicable contracts. We are required to estimate the fair value of policy liabilities for index annuities, including the embedded derivatives, by valuing the "host" (or guaranteed) component of the liabilities and projecting (i) the expected index credits on the next policy anniversary dates and (ii) the net cost of annual options we will purchase in the future to fund index credits. Our estimates of the fair value of these embedded derivatives are based on assumptions related to underlying policy terms (including annual participation rates, asset fees, cap rates and minimum guarantees), index values, notional amounts, strike prices and expected lives of the policies. The change in fair value of embedded derivatives increases with increases in volatility in the indices and interest rates. The change in fair value of the embedded derivatives will not correspond to the change in fair value of the purchased options because the purchased options are one-year options while the options valued in the fair value of embedded derivatives cover the expected life of the contracts which typically exceed 10 years.

Page 27 of 46

•

We adjust the amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and deferred sales inducements to reflect the impact of the items discussed above.

        The amounts reported with respect to our index business for SFAS No. 133 are summarized as follows:

Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs and Deferred Sales Inducements

        Commissions and certain other costs relating to the production of new business are not expensed when incurred but instead are capitalized as deferred policy acquisition costs or deferred sales inducements. Only costs which are expected to be recovered from future policy revenues and gross profits may be deferred. Deferred policy acquisition costs consist principally of commissions and certain costs of policy issuance. Deferred sales inducements consist of first-year premium and interest bonuses credited to policyholder account balances.

        Deferred policy acquisition costs totaled $713.0 million and $608.2 million at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Deferred sales inducements totaled $159.5 million and $95.5 million at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. For annuity and single premium universal life products, these costs are being amortized generally in proportion to expected gross profits from investments and, to a lesser extent, from surrender charges and mortality and expense margins. Current period amortization must be adjusted retrospectively if changes occur in estimates of future gross profits/margins (including the impact of realized investment gains and losses). Our estimates of future gross profits/margins are based on actuarial assumptions related to the underlying policies terms, lives of the policies, yield on investments supporting the liabilities and level of expenses necessary to maintain the polices over their entire lives.

        We adopted the Accounting Standards Executive Committee of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Statement of Position (SOP) 03-1, "Accounting and Reporting by Insurance Enterprises for Certain Nontraditional Long-Durantion Contracts and for Separate Accounts" on January 1, 2004. As it applies to us, SOP 03-1 established guidance for the accounting and presentation of costs related to sales inducements. There was no change to our method of accounting for sales inducements; however, the capitalized costs are now separately disclosed in the consolidated balance sheets and the related amortization expense is included in interest credited to account balances in the consolidated statements of income. Prior to 2004, the capitalized costs were included in deferred policy acquisition costs and the amortization expense was included in the amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs. The 2003 and 2002 amounts have been reclassified to conform with the 2004 presentation.

Page 28 of 46

Deferred Income Tax Assets

        As of December 31, 2004 and 2003, we had $70.6 million and $58.8 million, respectively, of net deferred income tax assets. The realization of these assets is based upon estimates of future taxable income, which requires management judgement. Based upon projections of future taxable income, and considering all other available evidence, we have not recorded a valuation allowance against these assets.

Results of Operations for the Three Years Ended December 31, 2004

        Annuity deposits by product type collected during 2004, 2003 and 2002, were as follows:

        For information related to our coinsurance agreements, see note 5 to our audited consolidated financial statements.

        Gross annuity deposits for 2004 increased 14% in comparison to 2003 resulting from increased marketing efforts following the completion of our initial public offering ("IPO"). Gross annuity deposits decreased 29% in 2003 compared to 2002 resulting from actions taken by us during 2003 prior to our IPO and during the fourth quarter of 2002 to manage our capital position, including reductions in our interest crediting rates on both new and existing annuities, reductions in sales commissions and suspension of sales of one of our higher commission annuity products and our most popular multi-year rate guaranteed product.

        Net annuity deposits after coinsurance ceded increased 64% during 2004 compared to 2003 because we reduced the coinsurance percent in our coinsurance agreement with EquiTrust Life Insurance Company ("EquiTrust"), a subsidiary of FBL Financial Group, Inc. ("FBL"), from 40% in 2003 to 20% in 2004, and effective August 1, 2004, we suspended the EquiTrust coinsurance agreement. Net annuity deposits decreased 33% in 2003 compared to 2002 due to the decrease in gross annuity deposits discussed above.

        Net income increased 78% to $45.3 million in 2004, and 79% to $25.4 million in 2003, from $14.2 million in 2002. The increases in net income were principally due to growth in the volume of business in force and increases in the investment spread earned on our annuity liabilities. Our net annuity liabilities (after coinsurance ceded) increased from $4.0 billion at the beginning of 2002 to $7.7 billion at the end of 2004. As set forth in a table included earlier in this item, we increased our aggregate investment spread to 2.38% in 2004 compared to 2.30% in 2003 and 2.11% in 2002. The increases in net income also benefitted from increasing amounts of income generated by the spread on

Page 29 of 46

our securities repurchase agreements due to increasing amounts of average borrowings outstanding under such agreements. Net income in each year was also impacted by the application of SFAS No. 133 to our index annuity business which we estimate increased net income in 2004 and 2002 by $2.6 million and $3.2 million, respectively, and decreased net income in 2003 by $1.6 million. Net income in 2003 was also favorably impacted by realized gains on sales of investments of $2.5 million on an after tax basis.

        Annuity and single premium universal life product charges (surrender charges assessed against policy withdrawals and mortality and expense charges assessed against single premium universal life policyholder account balances) increased 10% to $22.5 million in 2004, and 33% to $20.5 million in 2003, from $15.4 million in 2002. Withdrawals from annuity and single premium universal life policies subject to surrender charges were $147.0 million, $166.9 million and $129.1 million for 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The average surrender charge collected on withdrawals subject to surrender charges was 15.2%, 12.2% and 11.2% for 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The increase in average surrender charges collected in 2004 compared to 2003 was principally due to a higher amount of surrenders in 2003 related to products which had a market value adjustment feature which reduced the amount of surrender charges collected on these surrenders.

        Net investment income increased 20% to $429.9 million in 2004 and 16% to $358.5 million in 2003 from $308.5 million in 2002. These increases are principally attributable to the growth in our annuity business and corresponding increases in our invested assets, offset by decreases in the average yield earned on our investments. Invested assets (on an amortized cost basis) increased 29% to $8.0 billion at December 31, 2004 and 18% to $6.2 billion at December 31, 2003 compared to $5.2 billion at December 31, 2002, while the yield earned on average invested assets was 6.28%, 6.43% and 6.91% for 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The declines in the yield earned on average invested assets are attributable to a general decline in interest rates and the reinvestment of net redemption proceeds from called securities at lower yields. See Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

        Realized gains (losses) on investments fluctuate from year to year due to changes in the interest rate and economic environment and the timing of the sale of investments. Realized gains and losses on investments include gains and losses on the sale of securities as well as losses recognized when the fair value of a security is written down in recognition of an "other than temporary" impairment. The components of realized gains (losses) on investments for the year ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 are summarized as follows:

        Change in fair value of derivatives (call options purchased to fund annual index credits on index annuities) was an increase of $28.7 million in 2004, an increase of $52.5 million in 2003 and a decrease of $57.8 million in 2002. See Critical Accounting Policies—Derivative Instruments—Index Products for the components of the change in fair value of derivatives.

Page 30 of 46

        The difference between the change in fair value of derivatives between the periods is primarily due to the performance of the indices upon which our options are based. A substantial portion of our options are based upon the S&P 500 Index with the remainder based upon other equity and bond market indices. The range of index appreciation for options expiring during the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 is as follows:

        Actual amounts credited to policyholder account balances may be less than the index appreciation due to contractual features in the index annuity policies (participation rates and caps) which allow us to manage the cost of the options purchased to fund the annual index credits.

        The change in fair value of derivatives is also influenced by the aggregate cost of options purchased which is related to the amount of policyholder funds allocated to the various indices, market volatility which affects option pricing and the policy terms and historical experience which affects the strikes and caps of the options we purchase. The aggregate cost of option purchases began declining in the second quarter of 2003 when we refined our hedging process to purchase options that were out of the money to the extent of anticipated minimum guaranteed interest on the index policies. Prior to that, all options were purchased at the money at a higher cost. The aggregate cost of option purchases increased during 2004 because more options were purchased at the money and option pricing increased due to greater market volatility. More options have been purchased at the money (or less out of the money than in preceding periods) because index returns have increased, thereby reducing the impact of minimum guaranteed interest on policy values and option purchases. See Critical Accounting Policies—Derivative Instruments—Index Products.

        Interest credited to account balances increased 23% to $305.8 million in 2004 and 35% to $248.1 million in 2003 from $183.5 million in 2002. These increases were principally attributable to index credits on index policies which increased to $122.7 million and $44.2 million in 2004 and 2003 as a result of increases in the underlying indices (see discussion above under change in fair value of derivatives). These increases were also attributable to a 19% increase in the average amount of annuity liabilities outstanding (net of annuity liabilities ceded under coinsurance agreements) during 2004 to $7.0 billion from $5.9 billion during 2003 and an increase of 25% from $4.7 million during 2002. These increases were offset in part by the decrease in weighted average cost of money, which we implemented in connection with our spread management process, of 23 basis points during 2004, 67 basis points during 2003, and 28 basis points during 2002.

        A component of interest credited to account balances is the amortization of deferred sales inducements. The amortization of deferred sales inducements was $10.6 million, $5.5 million and $4.1 million for the year December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The increases in amortization during 2004 and 2003 were principally attributable to growth in the sales of our premium and interest bonus products. The application of SFAS No. 133 to the amortization of deferred sales inducements resulted in a $1.4 million increase in amortization in 2004, a decrease in amortization of $0.2 million in 2003 and an increase in amortization of $0.1 million in 2002. Bonus products made up 64% and 58% of our total annuity deposits during 2004 and 2003, respectively. See Critical Accounting Policies—Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs and Deferred Sales Inducements.

Page 31 of 46

        Change in fair value of embedded derivatives was a decrease of $8.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2004 compared to an increase of $66.8 million in 2003 and a decrease of $5 million in 2002. The change in the amount of expense recognized during 2004, 2003 and 2002 primarily resulted from the increase or decrease in expected index credits on the next policy anniversary dates, which are related to the change in the fair value of the options acquired to fund these index credits discussed above in the "Change in fair value of derivatives". In addition, the host value of the index reserve liabilities increased primarily as a result of increases in index annuity premium deposits. See Critical Accounting Policies—Derivative Instruments—Index Products.

        Interest expense on subordinated debentures for 2004 increased to $9.6 million from $7.7 million in 2003. The comparable amount for 2002 was $7.4 million and is reported as minority interests in subsidiaries. The increase during 2004 compared to 2003 was due to the issuance of additional floating rate subordinated debentures during 2004 of $59.2 million and $12.4 million issued in December 2003. The amount of subordinated debentures outstanding at December 31, 2004 was $173.6 million compared to $116.4 million at December 31, 2003. See Financial Condition—Liabilities.

        Interest expense on amounts due under repurchase agreements and other interest expense increased to $3.1 million in 2004 from $1.3 million in 2003 and $1.8 million in 2002. The amounts include other interest expense of $0.1 million in 2003 and $1.1 million in 2002. The increase in 2004 is due to an increase in interest expense on amounts due under repurchase agreements. The decrease in 2003 is due to the reduction in other interest expense, offset in part by an increase in interest expense on amounts due under repurchase agreements. The increases in interest expense on amounts due under repurchase agreements are principally due to increases in the borrowings outstanding which averaged $196.3 million, $84.6 million and $46.0 million during 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively and changes in the weighted average interest rates on amounts borrowed which were 1.60%, 1.35% and 1.59% for 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Other interest expense in 2003 was attributable to a financial reinsurance agreement that was terminated in 2003. Other interest expense in 2002 was attributable to the aforementioned financial reinsurance agreement and the short-sale of U.S. Treasury securities for tax planning purposes.

        Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs increased 43% to $67.9 million in 2004 and 40% to $47.5 million in 2003 from $34.1 million in 2002. These increases are primarily due to additional annuity deposits as discussed above. Additional amortization associated with net realized gains on investments for the year ended December 31, 2003 was $3.1 million. The application of SFAS No. 133 resulted in a $5.0 million increase in amortization in 2004, a decrease in amortization of $1.5 million in 2003, and an increase in amortization of $1.4 million in 2002.

        Other operating costs and expenses increased 25% to $32.0 million in 2004 and 18% to $25.6 million in 2003 from $21.6 million in 2002. The increase during 2004 compared to 2003 was principally attributable to $1.8 million of paid and accrued guaranty fund assessments related to the insolvency of London Pacific Life and Annuity Company, an increase of $1.4 million in salaries and related costs of employment due to the growth in our annuity business, $0.8 million in marketing and advertising costs, and $1.1 million in printing and postage costs related to existing policies and marketing of new policies. The increase during 2003 compared to 2002 was principally attributable to an increase of $0.8 million in professional fees related to litigation, $1.5 million in salaries and related costs of employment due to growth in our annuity business and $1.4 million in risk charges related to the reinsurance agreement entered into with Hannover Life Reassurance Company of America on November 1, 2002. This agreement is more fully described in note 5 to our audited consolidated financial statements.

        Income tax expense increased 80% to $24.3 million in 2004 from $13.5 million in 2003. Income tax expense increased to $13.5 million in 2003 from $7.3 million in 2002. These increases were principally due to an increase in pre-tax income. Our effective tax rates for 2004, 2003 and 2002 were 35%, 35%

Page 32 of 46

and 34%, respectively, after taking into consideration the impact of earnings attributable to company-obligated mandatorily redeemable preferred securities of subsidiary trusts in 2002. See note 6 to our audited consolidated financial statements.

Financial Condition

Investments

        Our investment strategy is to maintain a predominantly investment grade fixed income portfolio, provide adequate liquidity to meet our cash obligations to policyholders and others and maximize current income and total investment return through active investment management. Consistent with this strategy, our investments principally consist of fixed maturity securities and short-term investments.

        Insurance statutes regulate the type of investments that our life subsidiaries are permitted to make and limit the amount of funds that may be used for any one type of investment. In light of these statutes and regulations and our business and investment strategy, we generally seek to invest in United States government and government-agency securities and corporate securities rated investment grade by established nationally recognized rating organizations or in securities of comparable investment quality, if not rated.

        We have classified a portion of our fixed maturity investments as available for sale. Available for sale securities are reported at market value and unrealized gains and losses, if any, on these securities (net of income taxes and certain adjustments for changes in amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and deferred sales inducements) are included directly in a separate component of stockholders' equity, thereby exposing stockholders' equity to volatility due to changes in market interest rates and the accompanying changes in the reported value of securities classified as available-for-sale, with stockholders' equity increasing as interest rates decline and, conversely, decreasing as interest rates rise.

        Cash and investments increased to $8.01 billion at December 31, 2004 compared to $6.23 billion at December 31, 2003 as a result of the growth in our annuity business discussed above. At December 31, 2004, the fair value of our available for sale fixed maturity and equity securities was $65.0 million less than the amortized cost of those investments, compared to $86.1 million at December 31, 2003. At December 31, 2004, the amortized cost of our fixed maturity securities held for investment exceeded the market value by $92.7 million, compared to $110.1 million at December 31, 2003. The decrease in net unrealized investment losses at December 31, 2004 compared to December 31, 2003 was generally related to a decrease in market interest rates.

Page 33 of 46

        The composition of our investment portfolio is summarized in the table below: