Back to GetFilings.com

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

One Edwards Way, Irvine, California 92614
(Address of principal executive offices) (ZIP Code)

(949) 250-2500
Registrant's telephone number, including area code

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý    No o

        Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ý

        Indicate by check whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2) Yes ý    No o

        The aggregate market value of the registrant's common stock held by non-affiliates as of June 30, 2004 (the last trading day of the registrant's most recently completed second quarter): $2,067,621,853 based on a closing price of $34.85 of the registrant's common stock on the New York Stock Exchange. This calculation does not reflect a determination that persons are affiliates for any other purpose.

        The number of shares outstanding of the registrant's common stock, $1.00 par value, as of February 25, 2005 was 59,583,131.

Documents Incorporated by Reference

        Portions of the registrant's proxy statement for the 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (to be filed on or before April 18, 2005) are incorporated by reference into Part III, as indicated herein.

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION
Form 10-K Annual Report—2004
Table of Contents

PART I

Item 1.    Business

        This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Company intends the forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for such statements contained in this report. All statements other than statements of historical fact in this report or referred to or incorporated by reference into this report are "forward-looking statements" for purposes of these sections. These statements include, among other things, any predictions of earnings, revenues, expenses or other financial items, any statements of plans, strategies and objectives of management for future operations, any statements concerning the Company's future operations, financial conditions and prospects, and any statement of assumptions underlying any of the foregoing. These statements can sometimes be identified by the use of the forward-looking words such as "may," "believe," "will," "expect," "project," "estimate," "anticipate," "plan," "continue," "seek," "pro forma," "forecast," or "intend" or other similar words or expressions of the negative thereof. Investors are cautioned not to unduly rely on such forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to substantial risks and uncertainties that could cause the Company's future business, financial condition, results of operations, or performance to differ materially from the Company's historical results or those expressed in any forward-looking statements contained in this report.

Overview

        Edwards Lifesciences Corporation is a global leader in products and technologies designed to treat advanced cardiovascular disease. The Company focuses on specific cardiovascular opportunities including heart valve disease, peripheral vascular disease and critical care technologies.

        Cardiovascular disease is the number-one cause of death in the world, and is among the top three diseases in terms of health care spending in nearly every country. Cardiovascular disease is both progressive and pervasive; progressive, in that it tends to worsen over time, and pervasive because it often affects an individual's entire circulatory system. In its later stages, cardiovascular disease is frequently treated with surgery, including heart valve replacement or repair procedures and coronary artery bypass graft ("CABG") procedures.

        The products and technologies provided by Edwards Lifesciences to treat cardiovascular disease are categorized into five main areas: Heart Valve Therapy; Critical Care; Cardiac Surgery Systems; Vascular; and Other Distributed Products.

        Patients undergoing surgical treatment for cardiovascular disease are likely to be treated using a variety of Edwards Lifesciences' products and technologies. For example, an individual with a heart valve disorder may have a faulty valve re-shaped and repaired with an Edwards Lifesciences annuloplasty ring, or a surgeon may elect to remove the valve altogether and replace it with one of Edwards Lifesciences' bioprosthetic tissue heart valves, which are made of bovine pericardial or porcine tissue. Virtually all high-risk patients in the operating room or cardiac care unit are candidates for having their cardiac function monitored by Edwards Lifesciences' critical care products. If a patient undergoes other types of open-heart surgery, such as a CABG procedure, the functions of their heart and lungs may be managed through the use of disposable products and equipment offered in certain international markets by Edwards Lifesciences' perfusion products. If the circulatory problems are in the limbs rather than in the heart, the patient's procedure may involve some of Edwards Lifesciences' vascular products, which include various types of balloon-tipped catheters that are used to remove blood clots, and stents that are used to prop open the diseased blood vessels of patients suffering from atherosclerotic vascular disease. Lastly, Edwards Lifesciences' other distributed products include sales of intra-aortic balloon pumps and other products sold primarily through the Company's distribution network in Japan.

Corporate Background

        Edwards Lifesciences Corporation was incorporated in Delaware on September 10, 1999. Unless otherwise indicated or the context otherwise requires, the terms "it," "its," "Company" and "Edwards Lifesciences" refer to Edwards Lifesciences Corporation and its subsidiaries.

        Edwards Lifesciences' principal executive offices are located at One Edwards Way, Irvine, California 92614. The telephone number at that address is (949) 250-2500. The Company makes available, free of charge on its web site located at www.edwards.com, its annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to those reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after filing such reports with the SEC. The Company's corporate governance guidelines, audit and public policy committee charter, compensation and governance committee charter, and code of business conduct are also posted on the Company's web site and are each available in print to any shareholder upon request by writing to: Edwards Lifesciences Corporation, Investor Relations, One Edwards Way, Irvine, California 92614.

Edwards Lifesciences' Product and Technology Offerings

        The following discussion summarizes the five main categories of products and technologies offered by Edwards Lifesciences to treat advanced cardiovascular disease. For more information on net sales from these five main categories, see "Net Sales by Product Line" under Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Heart Valve Therapy

        Edwards Lifesciences is the world's leading manufacturer of tissue heart valves and repair products, which are used to replace or repair a patient's diseased or defective heart valve. The Company operates manufacturing facilities in Irvine, California, and Horw, Switzerland, producing pericardial and porcine valves from biologically inert animal tissue sewn onto proprietary wireform stents.

        The core of Edwards Lifesciences' tissue product line is the Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT pericardial valve, including PERIMOUNT Magna, the newest generation pericardial valve approved for sale in the United States, Europe and Canada. The PERIMOUNT valve is the most widely prescribed tissue heart valve in the world due to its proven durability and performance, and is the only pericardial tissue valve available in the United States. Edwards Lifesciences also sells porcine valves, stentless tissue valves and mechanical valves. In addition to its replacement valves, Edwards Lifesciences pioneered and is the worldwide leader in heart valve repair therapies, including annuloplasty rings and systems.

        Edwards Lifesciences is currently developing technologies for the percutaneous (catheter-based) repair and replacement of heart valves, which the Company believes can address a greater number of patients than are currently treated with conventional open-heart surgery.

Critical Care

        Edwards Lifesciences is a world leader in hemodynamic monitoring systems that are used to measure a patient's heart function in surgical and intensive care settings. Hemodynamic monitoring enables a clinician to balance the oxygen supply and demand of a critically ill patient and plays an important role in assuring that the heart function of millions of patients who have pre-existing cardiovascular conditions or other critical illnesses is optimized before they undergo a surgical procedure.

        Edwards Lifesciences' hemodynamic monitoring technologies are often deployed before, during and after open-heart, major vascular, major abdominal, neurological and orthopedic surgical

2

procedures. Edwards Lifesciences manufactures and markets the Swan-Ganz brand line of hemodynamic monitoring products. Edwards Lifesciences' most recent addition to its hemodynamic monitoring product line is the PreSep central venous oximetry catheter, designed to help clinicians identify and manage sepsis, a widespread blood infection. New minimally invasive cardiac monitoring technology, including Edwards' FloTrac system, is planned for commercialization in 2005.

        Edwards Lifesciences is a global leader in the broader field of disposable pressure monitoring devices and has a line of innovative products enabling closed-loop arterial blood sampling to protect both patients and clinicians from the risk of infection. Central venous catheters are the primary route for fluid and medication delivery to patients undergoing major surgical procedures and/or intensive care. The Company's Advanced Venous Access products provide increased convenience, effectiveness and efficiency by integrating the capabilities of an introducer and multi-lumen central venous access catheter into a single device.

        The Company also markets a range of products required to perform continuous renal replacement therapies including access catheters, hemofilters, substitution fluids and pumps.

Cardiac Surgery Systems

        The Company is a leading manufacturer of select disposable products used during cardiac surgery including cannula to facilitate venous drainage during perfusion, aortic dispersion cannula, and products to facilitate coronary artery bypass surgery when performed on a beating heart. Edwards Lifesciences also produces the EMBOL-X system, the only system of its kind designed to capture embolic material, such as blood clots or tissue fragments that might be generated during open-heart surgery procedures.

        For customers in regions outside of the United States and Western Europe, Edwards Lifesciences develops, manufactures and distributes a line of disposable perfusion products used during the practice of bypassing the heart and lungs during open-heart surgical procedures. In January 2005, the Company divested its Japanese perfusion products business.

        Edwards Lifesciences distributes carbon-dioxide lasers and related disposables for use in transmyocardial revascularization, a procedure for treating severe angina. These products are manufactured by PLC Systems Inc. ("PLC"), and Edwards Lifesciences is responsible for all sales, marketing and distribution of these products in the United States. The Company has also partnered with PLC to commercialize the Optiwave 980 surgical ablation system, a photonic laser system for treating cardiac arrhythmias.

Vascular

        The pervasive nature of cardiovascular disease means that the circulatory conditions that occur inside the heart are often mirrored elsewhere in a patient's body. Atherosclerotic disease is one common condition that involves the thickening of blood-carrying vessels and the formation of circulation-restricting plaque, clots and other substances, and often occurs concurrently in the vascular system as well as in the heart. When the abdomen, arms or legs are impacted, the diagnosis is usually peripheral vascular disease ("PVD"), which occurs in millions of patients worldwide.

        Edwards Lifesciences manufactures and sells a variety of products used to treat occlusive PVD, including a line of balloon-tipped, catheter-based products, as well as surgical clips and inserts, angioscopy equipment and artificial implantable grafts. Edwards Lifesciences' Fogarty line of embolectomy catheters has been an industry standard for removing blood clots from peripheral blood vessels for more than 40 years.

        Edwards Lifesciences also manufactures and sells LifeStent balloon-expandable and self-expanding non-coronary stents that are used to prop open the diseased blood vessels of patients suffering from

3

atherosclerotic vascular disease. The Company continued to expand its LifeStent product line during the year.

        Although Edwards Lifesciences discontinued sales and development of its Lifepath AAA endovascular graft system for treating abdominal aortic aneurysms in 2004, the Company continues to distribute third-party abdominal aortic aneurysm graft products in Europe.

Other Distributed Products

        Other distributed products primarily include sales of intra-aortic balloon pumps, pacemakers and other products sold though the Company's operations in Japan. During the first quarter of 2005, Edwards exited its pacemaker distribution business.

Competition

        The medical devices industry is highly competitive. Edwards Lifesciences competes with many companies, ranging from small start-up enterprises to companies that are larger and more established than Edwards Lifesciences with access to significant financial resources. Furthermore, rapid product development and technological change characterize the market in which Edwards Lifesciences competes. The present or future products of Edwards Lifesciences could be rendered obsolete or uneconomical as a result of technological advances by one or more of Edwards Lifesciences' present or future competitors or by other therapies, including drug therapies. Edwards Lifesciences must continue to develop and acquire new products and technologies to remain competitive in the cardiovascular medical devices industry. Edwards Lifesciences believes that it competes primarily on the basis of product reliability and performance, product features that enhance patient benefit, customer and sales support, and cost-effectiveness.

        The cardiovascular segment of the medical device industry is dynamic and currently undergoing significant change due to cost-of-care considerations, regulatory reform, industry and customer consolidation and evolving patient needs. The ability to provide cost-effective products and technologies that improve clinical outcomes is becoming increasingly important for medical device manufacturers.

        Edwards Lifesciences' products and technologies face substantial competition from a number of companies. In heart valve therapy, the primary competitors include St. Jude Medical, Inc., Medtronic, Inc. and the Sorin Group. In critical care, Edwards Lifesciences' principal competitors include Hospira, Inc. and Arrow International, Inc. In cardiac surgery systems, Edwards Lifesciences competes with the Sorin Group, Medtronic, Inc. and Getinge AB. In vascular, Edwards Lifesciences' primary competitors for the traditional surgical segments of its business include W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc., LeMaitre Vascular Inc. and Applied Medical Resources Corporation. For emerging peripheral vascular disease products, Edwards Lifesciences' competitors are Johnson & Johnson, Boston Scientific Corporation, Guidant Corporation and Medtronic, Inc.

Sales and Marketing

        Edwards Lifesciences has a number of broad product lines that require a sales and marketing strategy tailored to its customers in order to deliver high-quality, cost-effective products and technologies to all of its customers worldwide. Edwards Lifesciences' portfolio includes some of the most recognizable product brands in cardiovascular devices today, including Carpentier-Edwards, Cosgrove-Edwards, Fogarty, Research Medical, Starr-Edwards and Swan-Ganz.

        Because of the diverse global needs of the population that Edwards Lifesciences serves, Edwards Lifesciences' distribution system includes a direct sales force and independent distributors. Edwards Lifesciences is not dependent on any single customer and no single customer accounted for more than 10% of Edwards Lifesciences' net sales in 2004.

4

        Sales personnel work closely with the primary decision makers who purchase Edwards Lifesciences' products, which include physicians, material managers, nurses, biomedical staff, hospital administrators and purchasing managers. Also, for certain of its products and where appropriate, Edwards Lifesciences' sales force actively pursues approval of Edwards Lifesciences as a qualified supplier for hospital group purchasing organizations that negotiate contracts with suppliers of medical products. Edwards Lifesciences has contracts with a number of domestic national buying groups and is working with a growing number of regional buying groups that are emerging in response to cost containment pressures and health care reform in the United States.

        United States.    In the United States, Edwards Lifesciences sells substantially all of its products through its direct sales force. In 2004, 44.7% of Edwards Lifesciences' reported sales were derived from sales to customers in the United States.

        International.    In 2004, 55.3% of Edwards Lifesciences' reported sales were derived internationally through its direct sales force and independent distributors. Edwards Lifesciences sells its products in approximately 100 countries. Major international markets for Edwards Lifesciences' products are: Japan, Germany, France, United Kingdom, Italy, Brazil, Canada, Belgium, Spain, The Netherlands and Australia/New Zealand. The sales and marketing approach in international geographies varies depending on each country's size and state of development. See Note 18 to the "Consolidated Financial Statements" contained herein for additional information.

Raw Materials and Manufacturing

        Edwards Lifesciences uses a diverse and broad range of raw and organic materials in the design, development and manufacture of its products. Edwards Lifesciences' non-implantable products are manufactured from man-made raw materials including resins, chemicals, electronics and metal. Most of Edwards Lifesciences' heart valve therapy products are manufactured from natural tissues harvested from animal tissue, as well as man-made materials. Edwards Lifesciences purchases certain materials and components used in manufacturing its products from external suppliers. In addition, Edwards Lifesciences purchases certain supplies from single sources for reasons of quality assurance, sole source availability, cost effectiveness or constraints resulting from regulatory requirements.

        Edwards Lifesciences works closely with its suppliers to assure continuity of supply while maintaining high quality and reliability. Alternative supplier options are generally considered and identified, although Edwards Lifesciences does not typically pursue regulatory qualification of alternative sources due to the strength of its existing supplier relationships and the time and expense associated with the regulatory validation process. Although a change in suppliers could require significant effort or investment by Edwards Lifesciences in circumstances where the items supplied are integral to the performance of Edwards Lifesciences' products or incorporate unique technology, management does not believe that the loss of any existing supply contract would have a material adverse effect on the Company.

        Edwards Lifesciences follows rigorous sourcing and manufacturing procedures intended to safeguard humans from potential risks associated with diseases such as bovine spongiform encephalopathy ("BSE"), commonly known as "mad cow disease." International health and regulatory authorities have given guidance identifying three factors contributing to the control of BSE: source of animals, nature of tissue used and manufacturing process. The Company complies with all current global guidelines regarding risks for products intended to be implanted in humans. The Company obtains bovine tissue used in its pericardial tissue valve products only from sources within the United States and Australia, where strong control measures and surveillance programs exist. In addition, bovine tissue used in the Company's pericardial tissue valve products is from tissue types considered by global health and regulatory organizations to have shown no risk of infectibility. The Company's manufacturing and sterilization processes render tissue biologically safe from all known infectious

5

agents and viruses, and exceed the worldwide standard for sterile medical products. See "Risk Factors" contained herein.

Quality Assurance

        Edwards Lifesciences is committed to providing quality products to its customers. To meet this commitment, Edwards Lifesciences has implemented modern quality systems and concepts throughout the organization. The quality system starts with the initial product specification and continues through the design of the product, component specification processes and the manufacturing, sales and servicing of the product. The quality system is designed to build in quality and to utilize continuous improvement concepts throughout the product lifecycle.

        Edwards Lifesciences' operations are certified under applicable international quality systems standards, such as ISO 9001, ISO 9002 and ISO 13485. These standards require, among other items, quality system controls that are applied to product design, component material, suppliers and manufacturing operations. These ISO certifications can be obtained only after a complete audit of a company's quality system has been conducted by an independent outside auditor. Periodic reexamination by an independent outside auditor is required to maintain these certifications.

Research and Development

        Edwards Lifesciences is engaged in ongoing research and development to deliver clinically advanced new products, to enhance the effectiveness, ease of use, safety and reliability of its current leading products and to expand the applications of its products as appropriate. Edwards Lifesciences is dedicated to developing novel technologies that will furnish health care providers with a more complete line of products that address opportunities within the specific cardiovascular disease areas on which the Company focuses.

        The Company invested $87.0 million on research and development in 2004, $72.8 million in 2003 and $65.2 million in 2002 (9.3%, 8.5% and 9.3% of net sales, respectively). A significant portion of Edwards Lifesciences' research and development investment has been applied to extend and defend its core heart valve, critical care and vascular franchises, including research and development relating to next-generation pericardial tissue valves and enhanced tissue processing technologies.

        Edwards Lifesciences is investing in the development of percutaneous heart valve repair and replacement technologies, designed to treat heart valve disease using a catheter-based approach as opposed to direct surgical techniques. In 2004, Edwards Lifesciences acquired Percutaneous Valve Technologies, Inc., a privately held firm with notable clinical experience and intellectual property relating to a percutaneous heart valve replacement system. Also in 2004, the Company acquired all of the technology and intellectual property associated with ev3, Inc.'s percutaneous mitral valve repair program. Both of these acquisitions enhanced the Company's existing percutaneous repair and replacement development efforts.

        In its critical care franchise, the Company is also pursuing the development of minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring systems, which offer the promise of collecting critical data using less invasive methods than current technologies. In its vascular franchise, the Company plans to broaden its LifeStent balloon-expandable and self-expanding non-coronary stents. Additionally, the Company is investing in additional growth opportunities, including alternative tissue valve materials, and angiogenesis gene therapy to treat peripheral vascular and coronary artery diseases.

6

        Edwards Lifesciences' research and development activities are carried out primarily in facilities located in the United States. The Company's experienced research and development staff is focused on product design and development, quality, clinical research and regulatory compliance. To pursue primary research efforts, Edwards Lifesciences has developed alliances with several leading research institutions and universities, and also works with leading clinicians around the world in conducting scientific studies on Edwards Lifesciences' existing and developing products. These studies include clinical trials, which provide data for use in regulatory submissions, and post-market approval studies involving applications of Edwards Lifesciences' products.

Proprietary Technology

        Patents and other proprietary rights are important to the success of Edwards Lifesciences' business. Edwards Lifesciences also relies upon trade secrets, know-how, continuing technological innovations and licensing opportunities to develop and maintain its competitive position.

        Edwards Lifesciences owns approximately 505 issued United States patents, 204 pending United States patent applications, 802 issued foreign patents and 478 pending foreign patent applications, and has licensed numerous United States patents and patent applications that relate to aspects of the technology incorporated in many of Edwards Lifesciences' products.

        Most of Edwards Lifesciences' products are protected in some way by issued patents and/or pending patent applications. Although the original Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve patent expired in 2002 in most countries, Edwards Lifesciences has a number of other key patents and pending patent applications in the United States, Europe, Australia, Japan and Canada on improvements to the pericardial valve that enhance and extend the original patent coverage. These improvements are included in the Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Magna pericardial valves and the Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Plus pericardial valves. Because of these design improvements, management does not expect the expiration of the original pericardial patent to have a significant effect on its business.

        Edwards Lifesciences has many important United States and foreign patents and pending patent applications related to mitral valve repair and, in particular, patent coverage on the Cosgrove-Edwards annuloplasty system and the Carpentier-Edwards Physio annuloplasty ring, as well as the Edwards MC3 tricuspid annuloplasty system and the IMR ETLogix annuloplasty ring. Edwards Lifesciences also has a number of significant United States and foreign patents and patent applications in the field of percutaneous heart valve repair and replacement, including the patent rights acquired from Jomed N.V. in February 2003, Percutaneous Valve Technologies, Inc. in January 2004 and ev3, Inc. in September 2004.

        Edwards Lifesciences also has a number of key United States and foreign patents and patent applications that cover catheters, systems and methods for hemodynamic monitoring and vascular access products. The issued hemodynamic monitoring and vascular access patents are expected to protect Edwards Lifesciences' intellectual property rights in such technologies for the next 8 to 16 years. Edwards Lifesciences has pending patent applications that relate to aspects of the technology incorporated in the FloTrac system, used to measure cardiac output by minimally invasive methods. Edwards Lifesciences also owns a significant number of United States and foreign patents and patent applications relating to intra-aortic embolic management systems, including the EMBOL-X system. Edwards Lifesciences has also exclusively licensed and owns several important United States and foreign patents and patent applications relating to peripheral stents, including the LifeStent products. In addition, Edwards Lifesciences has exclusively licensed a portfolio of United States and foreign patents and patent applications in the angiogenesis field.

        Although some of Edwards Lifesciences' patents are due to expire within the next five years, Edwards Lifesciences' patent strategy is to file improvement patent applications and, in some cases, additional patent applications covering new aspects or modifications of the affected products, or line

7

extensions of these products. As a result, the duration of some of the patents covering Edwards Lifesciences' products can extend up to 20 years from the date of filing of the patent application. There can be no assurance that pending patent applications will result in issued patents. There can also be no assurance that pending improvement applications or additional patent applications covering new aspects or modifications of the affected products, or line extensions of these products, will result in issued patents. Edwards Lifesciences management does not believe that the expiration of any one or more of its patents that are due to expire in the next five years will cause a material adverse effect on the sales of Edwards Lifesciences' products.

        Edwards Lifesciences is a party to several license agreements with unrelated third parties pursuant to which it has obtained, for varying terms, the exclusive or non-exclusive rights to certain patents held by such third parties in consideration for cross licensing rights or royalty payments. Edwards Lifesciences has also granted various rights in its own patents to others under license agreements. Competitors may challenge the validity and enforceability of, or circumvent, patents issued to or licensed by Edwards Lifesciences. Such patents may also be found to be insufficiently broad to provide Edwards Lifesciences with a competitive advantage.

        Edwards Lifesciences actively monitors the products of its competitors for possible infringement of Edwards Lifesciences' owned and/or licensed patents. Litigation has been necessary to enforce certain patent rights held by Edwards Lifesciences, and the Company plans to continue to defend and prosecute its rights with respect to such patents. However, the Company's efforts in this regard may not be successful. In addition, patent litigation could result in substantial cost and diversion of effort. Edwards Lifesciences also relies upon trade secrets for protection of its confidential and proprietary information. Others may independently develop substantially equivalent proprietary information and techniques, and third parties may otherwise gain access to Edwards Lifesciences' trade secrets.

        The following table identifies some of the primary trademarks of Edwards Lifesciences that are registered in the United States Patent and Trademark Office:

        Other key trademarks owned by Edwards Lifesciences include:

        Many of these trademarks have also been registered for use in certain foreign countries where registration is available and Edwards Lifesciences has determined it is commercially advantageous to do so.

Government Regulation and Other Matters

        Regulatory Approvals.    In the United States, the Food and Drug Administration ("FDA") has responsibility for regulating the introduction of new medical devices. The FDA regulates laboratory and manufacturing practices, labeling and record-keeping for medical devices, and review of required

8

manufacturers' reports of adverse experience to identify potential problems with marketed medical devices. Many of the devices that Edwards Lifesciences develops and markets are in a category for which the FDA has implemented stringent clinical investigation and pre-market approval requirements. The process of obtaining FDA approval to market a product can be resource-intensive, lengthy and costly. FDA review may involve substantial delays that adversely affect the marketing and sale of Edwards Lifesciences' products. Any delay or acceleration experienced by Edwards Lifesciences in obtaining regulatory approvals to conduct clinical trials or in obtaining required market clearances (especially with respect to significant products in the regulatory process that have been discussed in public announcements) may affect Edwards Lifesciences' operations or the market's expectations for the timing of such events and, consequently, the market price for Edwards Lifesciences' common stock. The FDA has the authority to halt the distribution of certain medical devices, detain or seize adulterated or misbranded medical devices, or order the repair, replacement or refund of the costs of such devices. The FDA also may require notification of health professionals and others with regard to medical devices that present unreasonable risks of substantial harm to the public health. The FDA may enjoin and restrain certain violations of the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act and the Safe Medical Devices Act pertaining to medical devices, or initiate action for criminal prosecution of such violations. Moreover, the FDA administers certain controls over the export of medical devices from the United States and the importation of devices into the United States.

        Medical device laws are also in effect in countries outside of the United States where Edwards Lifesciences does business. These range from comprehensive device approval requirements for some or all of Edwards Lifesciences' medical device products to requests for product data or certifications. The number and scope of these requirements are increasing.

        Edwards Lifesciences is also governed by federal, state, local and foreign laws of general applicability, such as those regulating employee health and safety. In addition, Edwards Lifesciences is subject to various federal, state, local and foreign environmental protection laws and regulations, including those governing the adverse impact of material on the environment.

        Health Care Initiatives.    Government and private sector initiatives to limit the growth of health care costs, including price regulation and competitive pricing, are continuing in many countries where Edwards Lifesciences does business, including the United States and Japan. As a result of these changes, the marketplace has placed increased emphasis on the delivery of more cost-effective medical therapies. Although Edwards Lifesciences believes it is well positioned to respond to changes resulting from this worldwide trend toward cost containment, proposed legislation and/or changes in the marketplace could have an adverse impact on future operating results.

        Diagnostic-related groups' reimbursement schedules regulate the amount the United States government, through the Health and Human Services Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, will reimburse hospitals and doctors for the inpatient care of persons covered by Medicare. In response to rising Medicare and Medicaid costs, several legislative proposals in the United States have been advanced that would restrict future funding increases for these programs. While Edwards Lifesciences has been unaware of significant domestic price resistance directly as a result of the reimbursement policies of diagnostic-related groups, changes in these reimbursement levels and processes could have an adverse effect on Edwards Lifesciences' domestic pricing flexibility.

        In keeping with the increased emphasis on cost-effectiveness in health care delivery, the current trend among domestic hospitals and other customers of medical device manufacturers is to consolidate into larger purchasing groups to enhance purchasing power. The medical device industry has also experienced some consolidation, partly in order to offer a broader range of products to large purchasers. As a result, transactions with customers are larger, more complex and tend to involve more long-term contracts than in the past. The enhanced purchasing power of these larger customers may

9

also increase the pressure on product pricing, although management is unable to estimate the potential impact at this time.

Employees

        As of December 31, 2004, Edwards Lifesciences had approximately 5,200 employees worldwide, the majority of whom were located at the Company's headquarters in Irvine, California, and at its manufacturing facilities in Puerto Rico and the Dominican Republic. Other major concentrations of employees are located in Europe, Japan and Brazil. Edwards Lifesciences emphasizes competitive compensation, benefits, equity participation and work environment practices in its efforts to attract and retain qualified personnel. None of Edwards Lifesciences' North American employees are represented by a labor union. In various countries outside of North America, the Company interacts with trade unions and work councils that represent a limited number of employees.

Risk Factors

        An investor should carefully consider the risks described below, as well as other information contained in Edwards Lifesciences' filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. If any of the events described below occurs, Edwards Lifesciences' business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially harmed. In that case, the value of Edwards Lifesciences' securities could decline and an investor may lose part or all of his or her investment.

If Edwards Lifesciences does not introduce new products in a timely manner, its products may become obsolete, and its operating results may suffer.

        The cardiovascular products industry is characterized by rapid technological changes, frequent new product introductions and evolving industry standards. Without the timely introduction of new products and enhancements, Edwards Lifesciences' products will likely become technologically obsolete over time, in which case its revenue and operating results would suffer. Even if Edwards Lifesciences is able to develop new technologies, these technologies may not be accepted quickly because of industry specific factors, such as the need for regulatory clearance, unanticipated restrictions imposed on approved indications, entrenched patterns of clinical practice and uncertainty over third party reimbursement

        Moreover, significant technical innovations generally will require a substantial investment before Edwards Lifesciences can determine the commercial viability of these innovations. Edwards Lifesciences may not have the financial resources necessary to fund these technical innovations. In addition, even if Edwards Lifesciences is able to successfully develop enhancements or new generations of its products, these enhancements or new generations of products may not produce revenue in excess of the costs of development, and they may be quickly rendered obsolete by changing customer preferences or the introduction by Edwards Lifesciences' competitors of products embodying new technologies or features.

Edwards Lifesciences may incur product liability losses that could adversely affect its operating results.

        Edwards Lifesciences' business exposes it to potential product liability risks that are inherent in the design, manufacture and marketing of medical devices. Edwards Lifesciences' products are often used in surgical and intensive care settings with seriously ill patients. In addition, some of the medical devices manufactured and sold by Edwards Lifesciences are designed to be implanted in the human body for long periods of time. Edwards Lifesciences could be the subject of product liability suits alleging that component failures, manufacturing flaws, design defects or inadequate disclosure of product related risks or product related information could result in an unsafe condition or injury to patients. Product liability lawsuits and claims, safety alerts or product recalls in the future, regardless of

10

their ultimate outcome, could have a material adverse effect on Edwards Lifesciences' business and reputation and on its ability to attract and retain customers.

Edwards Lifesciences may experience supply interruptions that could harm its ability to manufacture products.

        Edwards Lifesciences uses a diverse and broad range of raw and organic materials and other items in the design and manufacture of its products. Edwards Lifesciences' non-implantable products are manufactured from man-made raw materials including resins, chemicals, electronics and metals. Edwards Lifesciences' heart valve therapy products are manufactured from treated natural animal tissue and man-made materials. Edwards Lifesciences purchases certain of the materials and components used in the manufacture of its products from external suppliers. In addition, Edwards Lifesciences purchases certain supplies from single sources for reasons of quality assurance, cost-effectiveness or constraints resulting from regulatory requirements. Edwards Lifesciences works closely with its suppliers to assure continuity of supply while maintaining high quality and reliability. Alternative supplier options are generally considered and identified, although Edwards Lifesciences does not typically pursue regulatory qualification of alternative sources due to the strength of its existing supplier relationships and the time and expense associated with this regulatory process. Although a change in suppliers could require significant effort or investment by Edwards Lifesciences in circumstances where the items supplied are integral to the performance of its products or incorporate unique technology, management does not believe that the loss of any existing supply contract would have a material adverse effect on the Company.

        In an effort to reduce potential product liability exposure, in the past certain suppliers have announced that they might limit or terminate sales of certain materials and parts to companies that manufacture implantable medical devices. In some cases, Edwards Lifesciences has been required to indemnify suppliers for product liability expenses in order to continue to receive materials or parts. There can be no assurance that an indemnity from Edwards Lifesciences will be satisfactory to these suppliers in the future. If Edwards Lifesciences is unable to obtain these raw materials or there is a significant increase in the price of materials or components, its business could be harmed.

Edwards Lifesciences may be required to recognize additional charges in connection with the write-down of some of its investments, the disposition of some of its businesses, the termination of its interest rate swap agreements or for other reasons.

        Edwards Lifesciences has made investments in the equity instruments of other companies, and may make further such investments in the future. To the extent that the value of any such investment declines, Edwards Lifesciences may be required to recognize charges to write down the value of that investment. See "Asset Impairments" under "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" included herein.

        In the case of some of the companies in which Edwards Lifesciences has invested, the value of its equity securities has declined since the time of its original investment. As a result, Edwards Lifesciences may be required to recognize additional charges, which could be substantial, to write down its investments. At December 31, 2004, Edwards Lifesciences had approximately $20.6 million of investments in equity instruments of other companies and had recorded unrealized losses of $4.5 million on these investments on its balance sheet in "Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)," net of tax.

        As part of the ongoing evaluation of its various businesses and products, Edwards Lifesciences from time to time identifies businesses or products that are not performing at a level commensurate with the rest of its business. Edwards Lifesciences may from time to time seek to dispose of these under performing businesses or product lines, and may also seek to dispose of businesses or product lines from time to time for strategic or other business reasons. If Edwards Lifesciences is unable to dispose of a business or product line on terms it considers acceptable, Edwards Lifesciences may voluntarily terminate that business or cease providing that product. Any of these events may result in charges, which could be substantial and which could adversely affect its results of operations.

11

        Edwards Lifesciences has entered into interest rate swap agreements in connection with some of its indebtedness, and expects that it will continue to do so from time to time in the future. In the event that Edwards Lifesciences elects to terminate a swap agreement prior to its maturity, it may be required to make cash payments to the counterparty and to recognize a charge in connection with that termination, which could adversely affect its results of operations.

Edwards Lifesciences may not successfully identify and complete acquisitions or strategic alliances on favorable terms or achieve anticipated synergies relating to any acquisitions or alliances, and such acquisitions could result in unforeseen operating difficulties and expenditures, require significant management resources and require significant charges or write-downs.

        As part of Edwards Lifesciences' growth strategy, Edwards Lifesciences regularly reviews potential acquisitions of complementary businesses, technologies, services or products, as well as potential strategic alliances. Edwards Lifesciences may be unable to find suitable acquisition candidates or appropriate partners with which to form partnerships or strategic alliances. Even if Edwards Lifesciences identifies appropriate acquisition or alliance candidates, it may be unable to complete such acquisitions or alliances on favorable terms, if at all. In addition, the process of integrating an acquired business, technology, service or product into Edwards Lifesciences' existing business and operations may result in unforeseen operating difficulties and expenditures. Integration of an acquired company also may require significant management resources that otherwise would be available for ongoing development of Edwards Lifesciences' business. Moreover, Edwards Lifesciences may not realize the anticipated benefits of any acquisition or strategic alliance, and such transactions may not generate anticipated financial results. In addition, Edwards Lifesciences may be required to take charges or write downs in connection with acquisitions it has made or may make in the future. In particular, acquisitions of businesses engaged in the development of new products may give rise to in-process research and development charges, which could be significant. For example, approximately $81 million was charged to in-process research and development in connection with the Company's 2004 acquisition of Percutaneous Valve Technologies, Inc. Edwards Lifesciences has taken in-process research and development charges in connection with other acquisitions and may take similar charges in connection with acquisitions the Company makes in the future, which charges could adversely affect its results of operations. Future acquisitions could also require issuances of equity securities, the incurrence of debt, contingent liabilities or amortization expenses related to other intangible assets, any of which could harm Edwards Lifesciences' business.

Edwards Lifesciences' business is subject to economic, political and other risks associated with international sales and operations.

        Because Edwards Lifesciences sells its products in a number of foreign countries, its business is subject to risks associated with doing business internationally. Edwards Lifesciences' net sales originating outside of the United States, as a percentage of total net sales, were 55.3% in 2004. Edwards Lifesciences anticipates that sales from international operations will continue to represent a substantial portion of its total sales. In addition, many of Edwards Lifesciences' manufacturing facilities and suppliers are located outside of the United States. Management expects to increase Edwards Lifesciences' international sales, which could expose it to greater risks associated with international sales and operations. Accordingly, Edwards Lifesciences future results could be harmed by a variety of factors, including:

•

changes in foreign medical reimbursement policies and programs;



•

unexpected changes in foreign regulatory requirements;



•

changes in foreign currency exchange rates;

12

•

changes in a specific country's or region's political or economic conditions, particularly in emerging regions;



•

trade protection measures and import or export licensing requirements;



•

potentially negative consequences from changes in tax laws;



•

difficulty in staffing and managing foreign operations;



•

changes in the international political situation;



•

differing labor regulations; and



•

differing protection of intellectual property.

Edwards Lifesciences is subject to risks arising from currency exchange rate fluctuations.

        Edwards Lifesciences generated 55.3% of net sales in 2004 outside of the United States. Substantially all of Edwards Lifesciences' sales outside of the United States are denominated in local currencies. Measured in local currency, a substantial portion of Edwards Lifesciences' foreign generated sales was generated in Europe (and primarily denominated in the Euro) and in Japan. The United States dollar value of Edwards Lifesciences' foreign generated sales varies with currency exchange rate fluctuations. Significant decreases in the value of the United States dollar to the Euro or the Japanese yen have had the effect of increasing Edwards Lifesciences' earnings even when the volume of foreign sales has remained constant. Significant increases in the value of the United States dollar relative to the Euro or the Japanese yen, as well as other currencies, could have a material adverse effect on Edwards Lifesciences' results of operations. Edwards Lifesciences has a hedging program that attempts to manage currency exchange rate risks to an acceptable level based on management's judgment of the appropriate trade-off between risk, opportunity and cost; however, this hedging program does not completely eliminate the effects of currency exchange rate fluctuations.

Increased interest rates could increase our borrowing costs and make it more difficult for us to access the capital markets.

        From time to time Edwards Lifesciences may issue securities to finance acquisitions, capital expenditures, working capital and other general corporate purposes. An increase in interest rates in the general economy could result in an increase in Edwards Lifesciences' borrowing costs for these financings, as well as under any existing debt that bears interest at a floating rate and for which interest rate swaps are not in place, and could otherwise restrict the ability of Edwards Lifesciences to access the capital markets.

Fluctuations in Edwards Lifesciences' quarterly operating results may cause its stock price to decline.

        Edwards Lifesciences' sales and operating results may vary significantly from quarter to quarter. A high proportion of Edwards Lifesciences' costs are fixed, due in part to significant sales, research and development and manufacturing costs. Thus, small declines in revenue could disproportionately affect operating results in a quarter, and the price of Edwards Lifesciences' common stock may fall. Other factors that could affect quarterly operating results include:

•

demand for and clinical acceptance of products;



•

the timing and execution of customer contracts, particularly large contracts that would materially affect Edwards Lifesciences' operating results in a given quarter;



•

the timing of sales of products and of the introduction of new products;



•

changes in foreign currency exchange rates;

13

•

unanticipated delays or problems in introducing new products;



•

competitors' announcements of new products, services or technological innovations;



•

changes in Edwards Lifesciences' pricing policies or the pricing policies of its competitors;



•

increased expenses, whether related to sales and marketing, raw materials or supplies, product development or administration;



•

adverse changes in the level of economic activity in the United States and other major regions in which Edwards Lifesciences does business;



•

costs related to possible acquisitions of technologies or businesses;



•

Edwards Lifesciences' ability to expand its operations; and



•

the amount and timing of expenditures related to expansion of Edwards Lifesciences' operations.

Edwards Lifesciences' inability to protect its intellectual property could have a material adverse effect on its business.

        Edwards Lifesciences' success and competitive position are dependent, in part, upon its proprietary intellectual property. Edwards Lifesciences relies on a combination of patents, trade secrets and nondisclosure agreements to protect its proprietary intellectual property, and will continue to do so. Although Edwards Lifesciences seeks to protect its proprietary rights through a variety of means, Edwards Lifesciences cannot guarantee that the protective steps it has taken are adequate to protect these rights. Patents issued to or licensed by Edwards Lifesciences in the past or in the future may be challenged and held invalid or not infringed by third parties. Competitors may also challenge Edwards Lifesciences' patents. In addition, certain of Edwards Lifesciences' patents are due to expire within the next five years and the Company may be unsuccessful in its efforts to extend these patents through improvement patents, modifications or line extensions. The failure to maintain Edwards Lifesciences' patents could have a material adverse effect on the Company.

        Edwards Lifesciences also relies on confidentiality agreements with certain employees, consultants and other parties to protect, in part, trade secrets and other proprietary information. These agreements could be breached and Edwards Lifesciences may not have adequate remedies for any breach. In addition, others may independently develop substantially equivalent proprietary information or gain access to Edwards Lifesciences' trade secrets or proprietary information. Edwards Lifesciences spends significant resources to monitor and enforce its intellectual property rights. However, Edwards Lifesciences may not be able to detect infringement and may lose its competitive position in the industry. In addition, competitors may design around Edwards Lifesciences' technology or develop competing technologies. Intellectual property rights may also be unavailable or limited in some foreign countries, which could make it easier for competitors to capture increased market position.

Third parties may claim Edwards Lifesciences is infringing their intellectual property, and Edwards Lifesciences could suffer significant litigation or licensing expenses or be prevented from selling products.

        During recent years, Edwards Lifesciences' competitors have been involved in substantial litigation regarding patent and other intellectual property rights in the medical device industry generally. From time to time, Edwards Lifesciences may be forced to defend itself against other claims and legal actions alleging infringement of the intellectual property rights of others. Because intellectual property litigation can be costly and time consuming, Edwards Lifesciences' intellectual property litigation expenses could be significant. Adverse determinations in any such litigation could subject Edwards Lifesciences to significant liabilities to third parties, could require Edwards Lifesciences to seek licenses from third parties and could, if such licenses are not available, prevent the Company from

14

manufacturing, selling or using certain of its products, any one of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company.

        Third parties could also obtain patents that may require Edwards Lifesciences to either redesign its products or, if possible, negotiate licenses to conduct its business. If Edwards Lifesciences is unable to redesign its products or obtain a license, Edwards Lifesciences may have to exit a particular product offering.

Edwards Lifesciences faces intense competition and consolidation within its industry, and if Edwards Lifesciences does not compete effectively, its business will be harmed.

        The cardiovascular medical device industry is highly competitive. Edwards Lifesciences competes with many companies, some of which have longer operating histories, better brand or name recognition and greater access to financial and other resources than Edwards Lifesciences. Furthermore, the industry is characterized by intensive development efforts and rapidly advancing technology. Edwards Lifesciences' present and future products could be rendered obsolete or uneconomical by technological advances made by one or more of its current or future competitors or by alternative therapies, including drug therapies. See "Business—Competition" included herein. Edwards Lifesciences' future success will depend, in large part, on its ability to develop and acquire new products and technologies, anticipate technology advances and keep pace with other developers of cardiovascular therapies and technologies.

        The medical device industry has been consolidating and, as a result, transactions with customers are larger, more complex and tend to involve more long-term contracts. The enhanced purchasing power of these larger customers may also increase downward pressure on product pricing. In addition, many existing and potential domestic customers for Edwards Lifesciences' products have combined to form group purchasing organizations, or "GPOs." GPOs negotiate pricing arrangements with medical supply manufacturers and distributors and these negotiated prices are made available to members of GPOs. If Edwards Lifesciences is not one of the providers selected by a GPO, it may be precluded from making sales to members of a GPO. Even if Edwards Lifesciences is one of the selected providers, it may be at a disadvantage relative to other selected providers that are able to offer volume discounts based on purchases of a broader range of medical equipment and supplies. Further, Edwards Lifesciences may be required to commit to pricing that has a material adverse effect on its sales and profit margins, business, financial condition and results of operations.

Edwards Lifesciences and its customers are subject to various governmental regulations, and Edwards Lifesciences may incur significant expenses to comply with these regulations and develop its products to be compatible with these regulations.

        The medical devices manufactured and marketed by Edwards Lifesciences are subject to rigorous regulation by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or "FDA," and numerous other federal, state and foreign governmental authorities. The process of obtaining regulatory approvals to market a medical device, particularly from the FDA and certain foreign governmental authorities, can be costly and time consuming, and approvals might not be granted for future products on a timely basis, if at all. Delays in receipt of, or failure to obtain, approvals for future products could result in delayed realization of product revenues or in substantial additional costs, which could have material adverse effects on Edwards Lifesciences' business or results of operations. In addition, there can be no assurance that Edwards Lifesciences will be or will continue to be in compliance with applicable FDA and other material regulatory requirements. If the FDA or some other foreign governmental authority were to conclude that Edwards Lifesciences was not in compliance with applicable laws or regulations, the FDA or such other foreign governmental authority, as applicable, could institute proceedings to detain or seize Edwards Lifesciences' products, issue a recall, impose operating restrictions, enjoin future violations and assess civil penalties against Edwards Lifesciences, its officers or its employees

15

and could recommend criminal prosecution to the Department of Justice. Moreover, the FDA or some other foreign governmental authority could proceed to ban, or request recall, repair, replacement or refund of the cost of, any device or product manufactured or distributed by Edwards Lifesciences. Furthermore, both the FDA and foreign government regulators have become increasingly stringent, and Edwards Lifesciences may be subject to more rigorous regulation by governmental authorities in the future.

Unsuccessful clinical trials or developmental procedures relating to products and development could have a material adverse effect on Edwards Lifesciences' prospects.

        The development of new products by Edwards Lifesciences requires extensive clinical trials and procedures. There can be no assurance that these trials or procedures will be successful or completed in a timely or cost effective manner. Failure to successfully complete these trials or procedures in a timely and cost effective manner could have a material adverse effect on the Company's prospects. In addition, current results from the Company's clinical trials or procedures may not be supported by actual long-term studies or clinical experience. If current results for a Company product cannot be supported by actual long-term studies or clinical experience, the Company's business could be adversely effected.

Edwards Lifesciences is subject to risks arising from concerns and/or regulatory actions relating to "mad cow disease."

        Certain of Edwards Lifesciences' products, including pericardial tissue valve products, are manufactured using bovine tissue. Concerns relating to the potential transmission of bovine spongiform encephalopathy, or "BSE," commonly known as "mad cow disease," from cows to humans may result in reduced acceptance of bovine products. Edwards Lifesciences obtains its bovine tissue only from closely controlled sources within the United States and Australia. In December 2003, one case of a cow infected with BSE was reported in the United States. In response to this situation, the U.S. Department of Agriculture announced new strengthened control and surveillance measures with respect to BSE. To date, there have been no additional reported cases in the United States. The bovine tissue used in Edwards Lifesciences' pericardial tissue valves is from tissue types considered by global health and regulatory organizations to have shown no risk of infectibility. Edwards Lifesciences has not experienced any significant adverse impact on its sales as a result of concerns regarding BSE, but no assurance can be given that such an impact may not occur in the future.

If third party payors decline to reimburse Edwards Lifesciences' customers for its products or reduce reimbursement levels, Edwards Lifesciences' ability to profitably sell its products will be harmed.

        Edwards Lifesciences sells its products and technologies to hospitals, doctors and other health care providers, all of which receive reimbursement for the health care services provided to its patients from third party payors, such as government programs (both domestic and international), private insurance plans and managed care programs. These third party payors may deny reimbursement if they determine that a device used in a procedure was not used in accordance with cost-effective treatment methods as determined by such third party payors, or was used for an unapproved indication. Third party payors may also decline to reimburse for experimental procedures and devices. Edwards Lifesciences believes that many of its existing and future products are cost-effective because they are intended to reduce overall health care costs over a long period of time. Edwards Lifesciences cannot be certain whether these third party payors will recognize these cost savings or will merely focus on the lower initial costs associated with competing therapies. If Edwards Lifesciences' products are not considered cost-effective by third party payors, Edwards Lifesciences' customers may not be reimbursed for its products.

        In addition, third party payors are increasingly attempting to contain health care costs by limiting both coverage and the level of reimbursement for medical products and services. There can be no

16

assurance that levels of reimbursement, if any, will not be decreased in the future, or that future legislation, regulation or reimbursement policies of third party payors will not otherwise adversely affect the demand for and price levels of Edwards Lifesciences' products. In Japan, customers are reimbursed for Edwards Lifesciences' products under a government-operated insurance system. Under this system, the Japanese government annually reviews the reimbursement levels for products. The Japanese government is also considering other reimbursement regulation. If the Japanese government decides to reduce reimbursement levels for Edwards Lifesciences products, its product pricing may be adversely affected.

Edwards Lifesciences is, or may be, subject to lawsuits related to products or services manufactured or performed by the Company.

        Edwards Lifesciences is, or may be, a party to, or may be otherwise responsible for, pending or threatened lawsuits or other claims related to products and services currently or formerly manufactured or performed, as applicable, by the Company or other matters. Such cases and claims may raise difficult and complex factual and legal issues and may be subject to many uncertainties and complexities, including, but not limited to, the facts and circumstances of each particular case or claim, the jurisdiction in which each suit is brought, and differences in applicable law. Upon resolution of any pending legal matters or other claims, Edwards Lifesciences may incur charges in excess of presently established reserves. While such a charge could have a material adverse impact on Edwards Lifesciences' net income or net cash flows in the period in which it is recorded or paid, management believes that no such charge relating to any currently pending lawsuit would have a material adverse effect on Edwards Lifesciences' consolidated financial position.

Edwards Lifesciences may incur increased costs as a result of recent changes in laws and regulations affecting public companies.

        Compliance with recent changes in laws and regulations affecting public companies, including the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, may result in increased accounting, legal and administrative costs. In particular, Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board impose new requirements with respect to the evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company's internal controls. The cost of complying with these new requirements could be substantial.

The market price for Edwards Lifesciences' common stock may be volatile.

        The market price of Edwards Lifesciences' common stock could fluctuate substantially in the future in response to any of the other risk factors set out above and below as well as a number of factors, including the following:

•

quarterly variations in operating results, as discussed above under "—Fluctuations in Edwards Lifesciences' quarterly operating results may cause its stock price to decline;"



•

announcements of innovations, new products, strategic developments or business combinations by Edwards Lifesciences or its competitors;



•

changes in Edwards Lifesciences expected operating expense levels or income and losses;



•

changes in financial estimates and recommendations of securities analysts;



•

the operating and securities price performance of other companies that investors may deem comparable to Edwards Lifesciences; and



•

changes in general conditions in the economy, the financial markets, the domestic or international political situation or the medical device industry.

17

        In addition, in recent years the stock market has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations. This volatility has had a significant effect on the market prices of securities issued by many companies for reasons unrelated to their operating performance. These broad market fluctuations may materially adversely affect Edwards Lifesciences' stock price, regardless of its operating results.

Edwards Lifesciences' stockholder rights plan, charter and bylaws, as well as provisions of Delaware law and the change in control provisions of the 3.875% convertible senior debentures issued by Edwards Lifesciences, could make it difficult for a third party to acquire the Company.

        Edwards Lifesciences has a stockholder rights plan that may have the effect of discouraging unsolicited takeover proposals. The rights issued under the stockholder rights plan would cause substantial dilution to a person or group that attempts to acquire Edwards Lifesciences on terms not approved in advance by its board of directors. In addition, Delaware corporate law and Edwards Lifesciences' charter and bylaws contain provisions that could delay, deter or prevent a change in control of the Company or its management. These provisions could also discourage proxy contests and make it more difficult for Edwards Lifesciences' stockholders to elect directors and take other corporate actions without the concurrence of its management or board of directors. These provisions:

•

authorize Edwards Lifesciences' board of directors to issue "blank check" preferred stock, which is preferred stock that can be created and issued by its board of directors, without stockholder approval, with rights senior to those of common stock;



•

provide for a staggered board of directors and three-year terms for directors, so that no more than one-third of Edwards Lifesciences' directors could be replaced at any annual meeting;



•

provide that directors may be removed only for cause;



•

provide that stockholder action may be taken only at a special or regular meeting and not by written consent;



•

provide for super majority voting requirements for some provisions of Edwards Lifesciences' charter; and



•

establish advance notice requirements for submitting nominations for election to the board of directors and for proposing matters that can be acted upon by stockholders at a meeting.

        Edwards Lifesciences is also subject to anti-takeover provisions under Delaware law, which could also delay or prevent a change of control. Together, these provisions of Edwards Lifesciences' charter and bylaws, Delaware law and its stockholder rights plan may discourage transactions that otherwise could provide for the payment of a premium over prevailing market prices of Edwards Lifesciences' common stock, and also could limit the price that investors are willing to pay in the future for shares of its common stock.

        In addition, if Edwards Lifesciences undergoes a change in control (as defined in the indenture relating to Edwards Lifesciences' 3.875% convertible senior debentures) prior to May 15, 2008, the holders of the 3.875% convertible senior debentures have the right, at their option, to require Edwards Lifesciences to purchase all or a portion of the debentures they hold. In addition, certain change in control events relating to the Company may constitute or otherwise result in events of default under the Company's other debt instruments or its receivables facilities, which could result in borrowings outstanding and other amounts due under those debt instruments and receivables facilities becoming immediately due and payable. These features of Edwards Lifesciences' 3.875% convertible senior debentures and other debt instruments and receivables facilities may also discourage a person or a group from attempting to acquire Edwards Lifesciences.

18

Edwards Lifesciences' issuance of preferred stock could adversely affect holders of its common stock and discourage a takeover.

        Edwards Lifesciences' board of directors is authorized to issue up to 50,000,000 shares of preferred stock without any action on the part of its stockholders. Edwards Lifesciences' board of directors also has the power, without stockholder approval, to set the terms of any series of preferred stock that may be issued, including voting rights, dividend rights, preferences over its common stock with respect to dividends or in the event of a dissolution, liquidation or winding up and other terms. In the event that Edwards Lifesciences issues preferred stock in the future that has preference over its common stock with respect to payment of dividends or upon its liquidation, dissolution or winding up, or if Edwards Lifesciences issues preferred stock with voting rights that dilute the voting power of its common stock, the rights of the holders of its common stock or the market price of its common stock could be adversely affected. In addition, the ability of Edwards Lifesciences' board of directors to issue shares of preferred stock without any action on the part of its stockholders may impede a takeover of Edwards Lifesciences and prevent a transaction favorable to the holders of its common stock.

Future sales of common stock in the public market could adversely affect the trading price of Edwards Lifesciences' common stock and its ability to raise funds in new securities offerings.

        Future sales of substantial amounts of the common stock of Edwards Lifesciences in the public market, or the perception that such sales could occur, could adversely affect prevailing trading prices of the common stock of Edwards Lifesciences that it may issue and could impair its ability to raise capital through future offerings of equity or equity-related securities. As of December 31, 2004, Edwards Lifesciences had:

•

59,438,236 shares of common stock outstanding;



•

9,883,077 shares of common stock reserved for issuance upon exercise of options outstanding under Edwards Lifesciences' stock option plans with a weighted average exercise price of $23.90 per share;



•

in addition to the shares reserved for issuance upon the exercise of options referred to in the preceding bullet point, 2,872,872 additional shares reserved for future issuance under stock option plans and employee stock purchase plans; and



•

2,744,238 shares of common stock reserved for issuance upon conversion of Edwards Lifesciences' outstanding 3.875% convertible senior debentures.

        No prediction can be made as to the effect, if any, that future issuances of shares of common stock or the availability of shares of common stock for future sale, will have on the trading price of our common stock. Issuances of substantial amounts of common stock, or the perception that such issuances could occur, may adversely affect prevailing market prices for our common stock.

19

Item 2.    Properties

        The locations and uses of the major properties of Edwards Lifesciences are as follows:

(1)

Owned property.

(2)

Leased property.

        The Dominican Republic lease expires in 2006; the Puerto Rico lease expires in 2008; the Horw, Switzerland lease expires in 2007; the Saint Prex, Switzerland lease expires in 2005; the São Paulo, Brazil lease expires in 2009; the Tokyo, Japan lease expires in 2009; and the Miyazaki, Japan lease expires in 2007. The Company's properties have been well maintained, are in good operating condition and are adequate for current needs.

Item 3.    Legal Proceedings

        On June 29, 2000, Edwards Lifesciences filed a lawsuit against St. Jude Medical, Inc. alleging infringement of several Edwards Lifesciences United States patents. This lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, seeking monetary damages and injunctive relief. Pursuant to the terms of a January 7, 2005 settlement agreement, Edwards Lifesciences was paid $5.5 million by St. Jude, Edwards Lifesciences granted St. Jude a paid-up license for certain of its heart valve therapy products and the lawsuit was dismissed. The settlement will not have a material financial impact on the Company.

        On August 18, 2003, Edwards Lifesciences filed a lawsuit against Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic AVE, Cook, Inc. and W.L. Gore & Associates alleging infringement of a patent exclusively licensed to the Company. The lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, seeking monetary damages and injunctive relief. On September 2, 2003, a second patent exclusively licensed to the Company was added to the lawsuit. Each of the defendants has answered and asserted various affirmative defenses and counterclaims. Discovery is proceeding.

        In addition, Edwards Lifesciences is or may be a party to, or may be otherwise responsible for, pending or threatened lawsuits related primarily to products and services currently or formerly manufactured or performed, as applicable, by Edwards Lifesciences. Such cases and claims raise

20

difficult and complex factual and legal issues and are subject to many uncertainties and complexities, including, but not limited to, the facts and circumstances of each particular case or claim, the jurisdiction in which each suit is brought, and differences in applicable law. Upon resolution of any pending legal matters, Edwards Lifesciences may incur charges in excess of presently established reserves. While any such charge could have a material adverse impact on Edwards Lifesciences' net income or net cash flows in the period in which it is recorded or paid, management does not believe that any such charge would have a material adverse effect on Edwards Lifesciences' financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

        Edwards Lifesciences is also subject to various environmental laws and regulations both within and outside of the United States. The operations of Edwards Lifesciences, like those of other medical device companies, involve the use of substances regulated under environmental laws, primarily in manufacturing and sterilization processes. While it is difficult to quantify the potential impact of compliance with environmental protection laws, management believes that such compliance will not have a material impact on Edwards Lifesciences' financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

Item 4.    Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

        No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004.

21

PART II

Item 5.    Market for the Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

(a)

On May 6, 2003, the Company announced that the Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program authorizing the Company to purchase on the open market and in privately negotiated transactions up to 2.0 million shares of the Company's common stock through December 31, 2005. This program was completed in August 2004. On May 12, 2004, the Company announced that the Board of Directors approved an additional stock repurchase program authorizing the Company to purchase on the open market and in privately negotiated transactions up to 2.0 million shares of the Company's common stock through December 31, 2006.

Market Price

        The principal market for Edwards Lifesciences' common stock is the New York Stock Exchange (the "NYSE"). The table below sets forth, for the calendar quarters indicated, the high and low sales prices of Edwards Lifesciences' common stock as reported by the NYSE.

Number of Stockholders

        On February 25, 2005, there were 35,578 stockholders of record of Edwards Lifesciences' common stock.

Dividends

        Edwards Lifesciences has never paid any cash dividends on its capital stock and has no current plans to pay any cash dividends. The current policy of Edwards Lifesciences is to retain any future earnings for use in the business of the Company.

22

Item 6.    Selected Financial Data

        The following table sets forth selected financial information with respect to Edwards Lifesciences. The information set forth below should be read in conjunction with Edwards Lifesciences' "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and "Consolidated Financial Statements" found elsewhere in this Form 10-K. See Note 6 to the "Consolidated Financial Statements" and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" for discussions of the effect of certain asset divestitures on Edwards Lifesciences' operations.

(a)

The results prior to April 1, 2000 present Edwards Lifesciences on a divisional basis as it had historically been operated as part of Baxter International Inc. ("Baxter"). From April 1, 2000 (the date following the distribution of the Company's common stock to stockholders of Baxter) to September 30, 2002, Edwards Lifesciences' Japan business is presented on an equity basis. Commencing October 1, 2002, the Company began reporting the results of its Japan business on a fully consolidated basis. See "Joint Venture in Japan" in "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" for more information.

(b)

See Notes 4 to 6 to the "Consolidated Financial Statements" and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" for additional information regarding charges of $110.5 million, $37.1 million and $70.7 million during 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. During 2001, the Company recorded a loss of $68.2 million, related to the sale of Edwards Lifesciences Cardiovascular Resources, Inc. ("ELCR") to Fresenius Medical Care AG and an impairment of the long-lived assets and investments related to certain products that the Company decided to discontinue selling. Additionally, during 2000, the Company recorded charges of $312.2 million related primarily to the sale of its perfusion products in the United States and Western Europe to Jostra AG.

(c)

During 2001, the Company wrote down goodwill by $83.0 million in connection with the sale of ELCR. Additionally, during 2000, the Company wrote down goodwill by $282.0 million in connection with the sale of its perfusion products in the United States and Western Europe to Jostra AG.

(d)

No per share data for the 2000 year has been presented because Edwards Lifesciences' earnings were part of Baxter's earnings through the close of business on March 31, 2000.

23

Item 7.    Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

        The following discussion and analysis presents the factors that had a material effect on the results of operations of Edwards Lifesciences during the three years ended December 31, 2004. Also discussed is Edwards Lifesciences' financial position as of December 31, 2004. You should read this discussion in conjunction with the historical consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.

Overview

        Edwards Lifesciences is a global provider of products and technologies that are designed to treat advanced cardiovascular disease. Edwards Lifesciences focuses on providing products and technologies to address specific cardiovascular opportunities: heart valve disease; peripheral vascular disease; and critical care technologies.

        The products and services provided by Edwards Lifesciences to treat cardiovascular disease are categorized into five main areas: Heart Valve Therapy; Critical Care; Cardiac Surgery Systems; Vascular and Other Distributed Products.

        Edwards Lifesciences' heart valve therapy portfolio is comprised of tissue heart valves and heart valve repair products. A pioneer in the development and commercialization of heart valve products, Edwards Lifesciences is the world's leading manufacturer of tissue heart valves and repair products used to replace or repair a patient's diseased or defective heart valve. In the critical care area, Edwards Lifesciences is a world leader in hemodynamic monitoring systems used to measure a patient's heart function, in disposable pressure transducers, and in central venous access products for fluid and drug delivery. The Company's cardiac surgery systems portfolio comprises a diverse line of products for use during cardiac surgery including oxygenators, blood containers, filters and other disposable products used during cardiopulmonary bypass procedures, as well as cannulae and transmyocardial revascularization ("TMR") technology. Edwards Lifesciences' vascular portfolio includes a line of balloon catheter-based products, surgical clips and inserts, angioscopy equipment, artificial implantable grafts, and stents used in the treatment of peripheral vascular disease. Lastly, other distributed products include sales of intra-aortic balloon pumps and other products sold primarily though the Company's distribution network in Japan.

        The healthcare marketplace continues to be competitive with strong local and global competitors resulting in pressure on maintaining market share. Global demand for healthcare is increasing as the population ages. There is mounting pressure to contain healthcare costs in the face of this increasing demand, which has resulted in pricing pressures. Management expects these trends to continue.

Joint Venture in Japan

        Prior to October 1, 2002, the cardiovascular business in Japan was being operated pursuant to a joint venture. A subsidiary of Edwards Lifesciences held a 90% profit interest and (a) recognized its shipments into the joint venture as sales at distributor price at the time the joint venture sold to the end customer and (b) utilized the equity method of accounting to record its 90% profit interest in the operations of the joint venture in Other Income. On October 1, 2002, the Company acquired the cardiovascular business in Japan from Baxter and began reporting the results of the Japan business on a fully consolidated basis. The acquisition did not materially impact the Company's net income as the terms of the joint venture agreement enabled Edwards Lifesciences to record substantially all of the net profit generated by the Japan business.

24

Results of Operations

Net Sales Trends

        The following is a summary of United States and international net sales (dollars in millions):

        The increase in net sales in the United States in 2004 was due primarily to increased sales in heart valve therapy products, which was driven by sales of the Company's Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT and PERIMOUNT Magna aortic valves and the PERIMOUNT valves with Tricentrix holder.

        The increases in international net sales in 2004 can be explained primarily by:

•

foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations which increased net sales by $38.5 million (primarily the strengthening of the Euro and the Japanese yen against the United States dollar);



•

heart valve therapy products, which increased net sales by $15.5 million driven primarily by strong PERIMOUNT valve sales in Europe;

partially offset by a decrease in net sales of $14.9 million due to the sale of the Company's German and Italian perfusion services businesses and the discontinuation of the Lifepath AAA program and a decrease in net sales in Japan resulting primarily from reimbursement changes.

        The increase in international net sales in 2003 was due primarily to the following:

•

the change in accounting for Japan (see "Joint Venture in Japan") increased net sales by $77.9 million;



•

the impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates increased net sales by $46.7 million (primarily the strengthening of the Euro and Japanese yen against the United States dollar); and



•

increased sales of heart valve therapy and vascular products (see below).

        The impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on net sales would not necessarily be indicative of the impact on net income due to the corresponding effect of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on international manufacturing and operating costs, and Edwards Lifesciences' hedging activities. For more information see "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk."

Net Sales by Product Line

        The following is a summary of net sales by product line (dollars in millions):

25

Heart Valve Therapy

        The net sales growth of heart valve therapy products in 2004 can be explained primarily by:

•

pericardial tissue valves increased net sales by $37.9 million primarily as a result of strong market adoption of the Company's Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Magna valve in the United States and Europe;



•

foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, which increased net sales by $14.3 million (primarily the strengthening of the Euro and Japanese yen against the United States dollar);



•

heart valve repair products increased net sales by $5.6 million;

        partially offset by decreased sales of porcine tissue valves of $5.1 million.

        The net sales growth of heart valve therapy products in 2003 resulted primarily from the following:

•

pericardial tissue valves increased net sales by $18.4 million;



•

currency exchange rate fluctuations increased net sales by $16.5 million (primarily the strengthening of the Euro and Japanese yen against the United States dollar);



•

the change in accounting for Japan increased net sales by $7.9 million; and



•

heart valve repair products increased net sales by $6.7 million.

        As the Company's Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Magna valve and the other recently introduced products have been well received globally, the Company expects that sales growth of heart valve therapy products in 2005 will exceed 10%. The Company will expand the availability of its Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Magna valve with ThermaFix, an anti-calcification process, in 2005 and expects the enhancement to drive further adoption among younger patients.

        In Japan, where only one competitor offered a stentless valve, the Company has received both regulatory clearance and reimbursement approval of its Edwards PrimaPlus stentless valve. PrimaPlus stentless valves expand the Company's product offering into the niche stentless valve market and strengthens the Company's market position in this region.

        The Company expects to strengthen its market leadership position in heart valve repair products with the introduction in the second half of 2005 of a new product with an indication-specific design.

Critical Care

        The net sales growth of critical care products in 2004 can be explained primarily by:

•

foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, which increased net sales by $13.4 million (primarily the strengthening of the Euro and the Japanese yen against the United States dollar);



•

market share gains in pressure monitoring products, which increased net sales by $8.4 million; and



•

overall strong sales demand in markets outside of Europe and Japan;

partially offset by decreased sales of base catheter products, which decreased net sales by $6.1 million, and recent reimbursement decreases in Japan.

        The net sales growth of critical care products in 2003 resulted primarily from the following:

•

the change in accounting for Japan increased net sales by $20.8 million;



•

currency exchange rate fluctuations increased net sales by $16.6 million (primarily the strengthening of the Euro and Japanese yen against the United States dollar); and

26

•

strong sales in global pressure monitoring products and overall strong sales demand in emerging global markets.

        Critical care products have been, and are expected to be, significant contributors to the Company's total sales. Minimally invasive monitoring systems, featuring the Company's FloTrac system, represent a new and potentially market-expanding opportunity for the Company. The Company received 510(k) clearance for the FloTrac system in January 2005 and expects to launch this product during the second quarter of 2005.

Cardiac Surgery Systems

        The net sales decrease of cardiac surgery systems in 2004 can be explained primarily by:

•

the sale of the Company's German and Italian perfusion services businesses in July 2003 and June 2004, respectively, which decreased net sales by $11.4 million;



•

perfusion products in Japan, which decreased net sales by $3.8 million;

        partially offset by

•

foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, which increased net sales by $5.0 million (primarily the strengthening of the Euro and the Japanese yen against the United States dollar); and



•

cannula products which increased net sales by $3.3 million.

        The net sales growth of cardiac surgery systems for 2003 resulted primarily from the following:

•

the change in accounting for Japan increased net sales by $16.6 million;



•

currency exchange rate fluctuations increased net sales by $6.4 million (primarily the strengthening of the Euro and Japanese yen against the United States dollar);

        partially offset by:

•

the reduction of low-margin distributed product sales in North America, which decreased net sales by $3.9 million; and



•

the sale of the Company's German perfusion services subsidiary in July 2003, which decreased net sales by $3.2 million.

        During the second quarter of 2004, the Company completed the sale of its Italian perfusion services business, which generated approximately $4.3 million of revenue in fiscal year 2003.

        In January 2005, the Company sold its Japan perfusion products business and expects to complete the transition of this business to the buyer in 2006. This business generated approximately $26.4 million in sales in 2004. Throughout the transition period, the Company will continue to act as supplier and expects sales of approximately half the level of 2004.

Vascular

        The net sales growth of vascular products for 2004 resulted primarily from the following:

•

currency exchange rate fluctuations increased net sales by $2.6 million (primarily the strengthening of the Euro and the Japanese yen against the United States dollar);



•

sales of interventional products which increased net sales by $2.4 million;

partially offset by the discontinuation of the Lifepath AAA program effective June 30, 2004, which decreased net sales by $2.6 million.

27

        The net sales growth of vascular products for 2003 resulted primarily from the following:

•

currency exchange rate fluctuations increased net sales by $3.8 million (primarily the strengthening of the Euro and the Japanese yen against the United States dollar);



•

the change in accounting for Japan increased net sales by $2.0 million;



•

Lifepath AAA sales increased net sales by $1.3 million, primarily in Europe;

        partially offset by continued declines in base vascular products.

        During 2004, the Company continued to introduce LifeStent products in the United States and Europe. The Company believes the supply constraints experienced during 2004 have been resolved and sales are expected to increase during 2005. Customer feedback on the LifeStent products has been positive, and the Company continues to believe that there is a large opportunity in the peripheral stent market.

Other Distributed Products

        The decrease in net sales of other distributed products in 2004 was due primarily to the Company's de-emphasis of certain lower margin distributed cardiology products in Japan. The net sales for 2003 increased primarily due to the impact of the change in accounting for Japan.

        The Company discontinued sales in Japan of certain lower margin distributed cardiology products effective September 2004. Additionally, the Company discontinued its distributed, low margin pacemaker business in Japan, in the first quarter of 2005. This product line generated sales of approximately $10.9 million in 2004.

Gross Profit

        Gross profit as a percentage of net sales for 2004 increased compared to the prior year due primarily to the impact of foreign currency rate fluctuations, including hedging activities (1.3 percentage points), the elimination of certain lower margin businesses (0.6 percentage points), and increased sales of higher margin products partially offset by reimbursement decreases in Japan.

        The increase in gross profit as a percentage of net sales for 2003 resulted primarily from improved manufacturing performance (1.9 percentage points) and the benefit of the consolidation of the Japan business effective October 1, 2002 (0.7 percentage points), partially offset by increased hedging expenses (2.1 percentage points).

Selling, General and Administrative ("SG&A") Expenses

        The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses in 2004 was due primarily to higher international expenses due to changes in foreign exchange rates ($12.6 million) and higher sales and marketing expenses in the peripheral stent and heart valve therapy product lines in the United States.

28

        The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses in 2003 resulted primarily from the change in accounting for the Japan business effective October 1, 2002 ($34.0 million), the impact of foreign currency rate fluctuations, primarily the strengthening of the Euro and Japanese yen against the United States dollar ($12.8 million), and activities in support of increased sales.

        The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of net sales for 2004 was due primarily to the increased investment in United States sales and marketing expenses in the peripheral stent and heart valve therapy product lines, partially offset by the cost reductions made in the third quarter of 2003.

        The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of net sales for 2003 resulted primarily from the consolidation of the Japan business effective October 1, 2002 (1.1 percentage point increase) and foreign currency rate fluctuations (0.2 percentage point increase, primarily the strengthening of the Euro and Japanese yen against the United States dollar).

Research and Development Expenses

        The increase in research and development expenses for 2004 resulted primarily from additional investment in the Company's percutaneous valve programs and the amortization of the Percutaneous Valve Technologies, Inc. ("PVT") intangibles of $14.4 million, partially offset by reduced spending in the Lifepath AAA program.

        The increases in research and development expenses for 2003 resulted primarily from investments in a broad range of interventional technologies, including market expanding endovascular heart valve repair and replacement therapies, investments in the Company's peripheral vascular disease platform and other growth initiatives.

        Research and development expenses as a percentage of net sales for 2004 increased compared to the prior year due primarily to the amortization and additional research and development spending related to PVT.

        The decrease in research and development expenses as a percentage of net sales for 2003 resulted primarily from the consolidation of the Japan business effective October 1, 2002.

Purchased in-process Research and Development Expenses

        On September 29, 2004, the Company acquired all technology and intellectual property associated with ev3, Inc.'s ("ev3") percutaneous mitral valve repair program for total consideration of $15.0 million. The acquisition is expected to be utilized in the Company's existing percutaneous mitral valve repair research and development efforts. At the time of the purchase, ev3 had been unsuccessful in developing a viable prototype and had discontinued the program. Additional design developments, bench testing, pre-clinical studies and human clinical studies must be successfully completed prior to selling any product. The risks and uncertainties associated with completing development within a reasonable period of time include those related to the design, development and manufacturability of the product, the success of pre-clinical and clinical studies, and the timing of European and United States regulatory approvals. Approximately $12.3 million of the purchase price was charged to in-process research and development. The value of the in-process research and development was calculated using cash flow projections discounted for the risk inherent in such projects. The discount

29

rate used was 30%. The valuation assumed approximately $39 million of additional research and development expenditures would be incurred prior to the date of product introduction. In the valuation, the Company estimated completion of the mitral valve repair program utilizing the intellectual property acquired from ev3 in 2009, and commencement of net cash inflows in 2010. The remaining fair market value of the assets purchased consisted primarily of patents unrelated to ev3's core mitral valve repair technology, which are being amortized over their estimated economic life of 19 years.

        On January 27, 2004, the Company acquired PVT, a development stage company, for $125.0 million in cash, net of cash acquired, plus up to an additional $30.0 million upon the achievement of key milestones through 2007. Included in PVT's technology is a catheter-based (percutaneous) approach for replacing aortic heart valves, comprised of a proprietary percutaneously-delivered balloon-expandable stent technology integrated with a tissue heart valve. Unlike conventional open-heart valve replacement surgery, this less-invasive procedure can be performed under local anesthesia and could potentially be a breakthrough for patients seeking an alternative to open-heart surgery.

        At the time of acquisition, the PVT aortic heart valve was being used in compassionate cases in Europe, and these clinical results had generated valuable feasibility data. It had been demonstrated that a heart valve could be successfully deployed and anchored using a catheter-based system. Also at that time, the Company was expecting to obtain a CE mark in Europe by the end of 2005 and to file for a Humanitarian Device Exemption ("HDE") in the United States. Upon approval of the HDE, the Company would be able to offer this device to as many as 4,000 patients per year. Broader commercialization in the United States was expected to begin with the submission of an Investigational Device Exemption ("IDE") by the end of the second quarter of 2004 followed by the commencement of a pivotal trial in 2005 and possible pre-market approval by the end of 2007. The risks and uncertainties associated with completing development within a reasonable period of time included those related to the design, development and manufacturability of the product, the success of pre-clinical and clinical studies and the timing of European and United States regulatory approvals.

        Approximately $81.0 million of the purchase price was charged to in-process research and development. The value of the in-process research and development was calculated using cash flow projections discounted for the risk inherent in such projects. The discount rate used was 25%. The valuation assumed approximately $20.9 million of additional research and development expenditures would be incurred prior to the date of product introduction. In the valuation, net cash inflows were forecasted to commence in 2007. The remaining fair market value of the net assets acquired consisted primarily of patents of $72.4 million that are being amortized over their estimated economic life of 11 years, and a deferred tax liability related to the patents of $28.1 million.

        On December 5, 2003, the Company acquired the stock of Whitland Research Limited ("Whitland") for $3.2 million in cash, although achievement of future milestones through 2006 could increase the total price to $5.6 million. Whitland was focused on the development of critical care monitoring technologies. The $3.2 million purchase price was allocated to acquired in-process research and development ($1.8 million) and patents ($1.4 million) based upon their estimated fair values. The patents are being amortized over their estimated useful life of 10 years.

        On February 18, 2003, the Company acquired the percutaneous mitral valve repair program of Jomed N.V. ("Jomed"), a European-based provider of products for minimally invasive cardiovascular intervention, for $20.0 million in cash. The acquisition included all technology and intellectual property associated with the program. At the acquisition date, the program, which was less than 50% complete, was involved in testing proprietary prototypes prior to initiating required pre-clinical studies and human clinicals. Additional design improvements, bench testing, pre-clinical studies and human clinical studies must be successfully completed prior to commercially selling the product in Europe and the United

30

States, which at the time of the transaction was expected in 2005 and 2006, respectively. The risks and uncertainties associated with completing development within a reasonable period of time included those related to the design, development and manufacturability of the product, the success of pre-clinical and clinical studies and the timing of European and United States regulatory approvals. Approximately $11.8 million of the purchase price was charged to in-process research and development. The value of the in-process research and development was calculated using cash flow projections discounted for the risk inherent in such projects. The discount rate used was 30%. The valuation assumed approximately $20.0 million of additional research and development expenditures would be incurred prior to the date of product introduction. In the valuation, material net cash inflows were forecasted to commence in 2008. The remaining fair market value of the assets acquired consisted primarily of patents that are being amortized over their estimated economic life of 17 years.

        Progress continues to be made on all of the purchased research and development programs. As of December 31, 2004 the programs related to the ev3 and Whitland acquisitions remained reasonably on track with the Company's original expectations. Although the PVT program remains reasonably on track with original expectations, the CE Mark is now expected in 2006, a conditional IDE was granted in the United States in January 2005, broad commercialization in the United States is anticipated in three to four years, and the HDE filing has been postponed. In January 2005, the Company commenced human feasibility studies of the product developed under the Jomed program. Commercialization of this product would be expected to occur in several years.

Asset Impairments

        In September 2002, the Company recorded a $67.4 million charge related to the impairment of its investment in preferred stock of World Heart Corporation ("WorldHeart"). The investment was written down to $6.2 million, which represented the value of the Company's preferred stock investment had it been converted into common stock at October 15, 2002 (the closing date of September's books). The decision to record the charge was based primarily on WorldHeart's September 2002 decision to refocus its product development efforts by adopting a new design concept for a next generation product that resulted in a significant delay (approximately two years) in its product development timeline (with a revised commercial launch date of 2007) and impaired WorldHeart's competitive position. Accordingly, the Company concluded that sufficient risk existed that WorldHeart may be unable to fully liquidate the Company's investment in WorldHeart's preferred stock. The Company believed that the best objective indicator of the then fair value of its investment in WorldHeart's preferred stock was the market price of WorldHeart's common stock based upon the Company's expectation that the value of its preferred stock investment would be realized through the common stock, as opposed to redemption of the preferred stock. In December, 2004, the Company recorded an additional charge of $4.7 million related to the impairment of its investment in WorldHeart resulting from the decline in its stock price.

        Additionally, in 2004, the Company recorded charges totaling $4.3 million related to the other-than-temporary impairment of technology investments in three unconsolidated affiliates. Two of the affiliates had announced they were discontinuing their development efforts and the book value of those investments was reduced to the residual distribution Edwards Lifesciences expects to receive from those companies. The other affiliate performed a reset financing that reduced the net value per share for all existing investors. This investment is now recorded at the reduced value.

Special Charges, net

Discontinued Products

        Due to a re-prioritization of the Company's investment initiatives, the Company decided in March 2004 to discontinue its sales effort of its Lifepath AAA endovascular graft program. In the first quarter of 2004, the Company recorded a special charge of $8.4 million related primarily to inventory

31

and contractual clinical obligations. In addition, the Company discontinued certain lower margin cardiology products in Japan resulting in a charge of $2.2 million related primarily to other non-productive assets.

Sale of Property Development Rights

        In November 2004, the Company recorded income of $7.4 million for the sale of property development rights in Irvine, California, that had no book value at the time of the sale.

Charitable Fund

        In December 2004, the Company recorded a charge of $5.0 million for an irrevocable contribution to a third party to create a charitable fund.

Severance Charge

        In July 2003, the Company recorded a charge of $13.0 million associated with a decision to streamline operations. The charge was related primarily to the severance costs associated with reducing the Company's worldwide workforce by 136 employees, primarily in the United States and Europe. As of December 31, 2004, $0.3 million of the charge remained unpaid.

Baxter Arbitration Settlement

        In January 2004, the Company concluded a dispute resolution proceeding with Baxter. Each company sought reimbursement from the other for a variety of claims arising from the Company's spin-off from Baxter in April 2000. The resolution resulted in a $5.3 million charge related primarily to the valuation of receivables at the date of spin-off, and a $5.4 million increase to Additional Contributed Capital related to the true-up of the beginning balance of equity.

Loss on Sale of Business

        Effective July 4, 2003, the Company sold its German perfusion services subsidiary to WKK GmbH, a German-based provider of hospital services, for a nominal amount. Sales generated by the German perfusion services subsidiary were approximately $3.5 million during the six months ended June 30, 2003 and $6.6 million for the year 2002. In accordance with SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets," and Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 100, "Restructuring and Impairment Charges," the Company recorded a pre-tax impairment charge of $3.3 million in the second quarter of 2003 to reduce the carrying value of the subsidiary's assets to fair value based upon the proceeds from the sale.

Pension Curtailment

        On November 4, 2003, the Company suspended its defined benefit pension plan in Puerto Rico ("the Plan"). Effective December 31, 2003, employees ceased earning additional defined benefits for future services. To mitigate the Puerto Rico employees' reduced benefits from the Plan's suspension, effective January 1, 2004, the Company increased its contributions to the Puerto Rico 1165(e) defined contribution plan. In accordance with SFAS No. 88, "Employers' Accounting for Settlements and Curtailments of Defined Benefit Pension Plans and for Termination Benefits," the Company recorded a curtailment loss of $1.9 million during the fourth quarter 2003. As of December 31, 2004, the Plan's accumulated benefit obligation exceeded the fair value of its assets by $5.2 million.

32

Spin-Off Expenses

        The Company recorded a $3.3 million charge for legal, administrative and regulatory expenses related to the October 2002 acquisition of the cardiovascular business in Japan (see "Joint Venture in Japan").

Equity Earnings in Japan Operations

        Equity earnings in Japan operations were $11.0 million in 2002. Equity earnings in Japan operations represent the Company's 90% profit interest in the cardiovascular business in Japan effective from April 1, 2000 through September 30, 2002. For more information, see "Joint Venture in Japan."

Interest Expense, net

        Interest expense, net was $14.2 million, $13.2 million and $11.5 million in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The increase in interest expense, net, for 2004 resulted primarily from a higher average debt balance, due largely to the financing of the PVT acquisition. The increase in interest expense, net for 2003 resulted primarily from the higher interest rate associated with the Company's fixed rate debt.

Other (Income), net

        The following is a summary of other (income) expense, net (in millions):

        Foreign exchange gains and losses relate to global trade and intercompany receivable and payable balances.

        Effective April 24, 2002, Edwards Lifesciences and Medtronic, Inc. entered into an agreement related to certain patent infringement claims pursuant to which the Company received a one-time cash payment of $20.0 million (recorded as a gain of $14.7 million, net of legal expenses).

33

Provision for Income Taxes

        The effective income tax rates for 2004, 2003 and 2002 were impacted as follows (in millions):

        Excluding the impact of in-process research and development expenses, asset impairments and special charges, net, noted above, the effective income tax rate was 26% for all years presented. The Company expects its effective income tax rate for recurring operations to be 26% for 2005.

        In exchange for the sale of the Novacor mechanical cardiac assist product line to WorldHeart in June 2000, the Company received WorldHeart preferred stock. In 2002, the investment in the WorldHeart preferred stock was deemed to be impaired and written down to its fair market value. A further write-down of the WorldHeart investment occurred in 2004. In addition, three other equity investments were deemed to be impaired and written down to fair market value in 2004. Due to the uncertainty of using any potential tax benefit for the losses, a valuation allowance of $13.8 million was established in 2002 and was increased by $6.6 million in 2004.

        Of the $81.0 million charge related to the PVT acquisition discussed above, $1.7 million related to tax deductible payments to exercise certain licensing options pursuant to the stock purchase agreement, and the remaining $79.3 million charge is permanently disallowed for income tax purposes.

        The American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the "Act") was signed into law in October 2004, which allows companies to repatriate cash into the United States at a special, temporary effective tax rate of 5.25 percent. The Company's evaluation of the amount of foreign earnings to repatriate under the Act, and the financial statement impact, is in process. As such, the Company is not in a position to decide on whether, and to what extent, foreign earnings that have not been remitted to the United States may be repatriated. Based on analysis to date, however, it is reasonably possible that between $150 million and $250 million may be repatriated. The related potential range of the income tax effect of the repatriation cannot be reasonably estimated at this time. The Company expects to be in a position to finalize its assessment by the end of the third quarter 2005.

        During 2003, the Company commenced a legal reorganization of its Brazil subsidiary to improve its balance sheet and to enhance its ability to conduct business in Brazil. Since being acquired a number of years ago, this subsidiary has incurred net operating losses due primarily to the devaluation of the local currency and interest expense incurred on inter-company debt. In addition, the reorganization allowed the Company to recognize the accumulated losses and inter-company debt write-off under United States tax law, resulting in federal and state tax benefits of $13.7 million.

34

        During 2003, the Company recapitalized its Japan subsidiary. As a result, a deemed dividend occurred for United States tax purposes resulting in an incremental tax provision of $6.2 million, net of foreign tax credits.

        As a result of tax law developments in 2002, the Company recorded a $20.1 million tax benefit during 2002 related to the loss on sale of its United States perfusion services business in June 2001.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

        The Company's sources of cash liquidity include cash on hand and cash equivalents, amounts available under credit facilities, accounts receivable securitization facilities and cash from operations. The Company believes that these sources are sufficient to fund the current requirements of working capital, capital expenditures and other financial commitments. The Company further believes that it has the financial flexibility to attract long-term capital to fund short-term and long-term growth objectives. However, no assurances can be given that such long-term capital will be available to Edwards Lifesciences on favorable terms, or at all.

        On June 28, 2004, the Company replaced its unsecured revolving credit agreement with a new unsecured five-year revolving credit agreement (the "Credit Agreement"), which will expire on June 26, 2009. The Credit Agreement provides up to an aggregate of $500.0 million in one- to six-month borrowings in multiple currencies. Borrowings currently bear interest at the London interbank offering rate ("LIBOR") plus 0.5%, which includes a facility fee and is subject to adjustment in the event of a change in the Company's leverage ratio, as defined by the Credit Agreement. The Company pays this facility fee regardless of available or outstanding borrowings, currently at an annual rate of 0.1%. All amounts outstanding under the Credit Agreement have been classified as long-term obligations, as these borrowings will continue to be refinanced pursuant to the Credit Agreement. As of December 31, 2004, borrowings of $117.1 million were outstanding under the Credit Agreement. The Credit Agreement contains various financial and other covenants, all of which the Company was in compliance with as of December 31, 2004.

        As further discussed in Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has two securitization programs whereby certain subsidiaries in the United States and Japan sell, without recourse, on a continuous basis, an undivided interest in certain eligible pools of accounts receivable. The significant benefits of the securitizations are lower cost of funds and differentiated sources of liquidity. The Company has been able to effectively lower its overall cost of funds as a result of the interest rate spreads it pays on these advances as opposed to borrowings under the current LIBOR based credit facility. Additionally, the Company believes that in diversifying its funding sources, the Company's funding availability in the capital markets is strengthened. As of December 31, 2004, the Company had sold a total of $90.4 million of trade accounts receivable and received funding of $80.4 million. The securitization program in the United States expires on December 19, 2005, and the Japan securitization program expires on December 3, 2005.

        On May 6, 2003, the Company's Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program authorizing the Company to purchase 2.0 million shares of the Company's outstanding common stock through December 31, 2005. In May 2004, the Board of Directors approved a second stock repurchase program authorizing the Company to purchase on the open market and in privately negotiated transactions up to an additional 2.0 million shares of the Company's common stock through December 31, 2006. Stock repurchased under these programs will be used primarily to offset obligations under the Company's employee stock option programs. During 2004, the Company repurchased 1.7 million shares at an aggregate cost of $59.1 million and also completed the first stock repurchase program.

35

        Net cash provided by operating activities in 2004 increased $38.5 million from 2003 due primarily to:

•

higher earnings in 2004 adjusted for non-operating and non-cash items;



•

increased net cash flows from payables and accrued liabilities from increased taxes payable; and



•

increased net cash flows from receivables from improved days sales outstanding offsetting increased sales levels;

partially offset by reduced cash flows from increases in inventories to build new product lines and support increased sales levels.

        Cash provided by operating activities in 2003 decreased $8.4 million from 2002 due primarily to:

•

reduced cash inflows from accounts receivable securitization; and



•

reduced cash inflows from increases in inventories

        partially offset by:

•

higher earnings in 2003 before non-cash charges and credits;



•

decreased net cash outflows from accounts and other receivables; and



•

decreased net cash outflows from accounts payable and accrued expenses.

        Net cash used in investing activities in 2004 consisted primarily of the acquisition of PVT and the purchase of ev3's technology of $137.7 million, and capital expenditures of $42.5 million.

        Net cash used in investing activities in 2003 consisted primarily of the acquisition of Jomed, Whitland and Embol-X, Inc. of $33.2 million, and capital expenditures of $37.9 million.

        Net cash used in financing activities in 2004 consisted primarily of purchases of treasury stock of $59.1 million, partially offset by proceeds from stock plans of $30.5 million and net proceeds from issuance of long-term debt of $7.1 million.

        Cash used in financing activities in 2003 consisted primarily of purchases of treasury stock of $49.4 million and net payments on debt of $4.0 million, partially offset by proceeds from stock plans of $36.6 million.

        A summary of all of the Company's contractual obligations and commercial commitments as of December 31, 2004 were as follows (in millions):

(a)

Unconditional purchase obligations consist primarily of minimum purchase commitments of inventory.

(b)

Contractual development obligations consist primarily of cash that Edwards Lifesciences is obligated to pay to unconsolidated affiliates upon their achievement of product development milestones.

36

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

        The Company's results of operations and financial position are determined based upon the application of the Company's accounting policies, as discussed in the notes to the consolidated financial statements. Certain of the Company's accounting policies represent a selection among acceptable alternatives under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States ("GAAP"). In evaluating the Company's transactions, management assesses all relevant GAAP and chooses the accounting policy that most accurately reflects the nature of the transactions. Management has not determined how reported amounts would differ based on the application of different accounting policies. Management has also not determined the likelihood that materially different amounts could be reported under different conditions or using different assumptions.

        The application of accounting policies requires the use of judgment and estimates. As it relates to the Company, estimates and forecasts are required to determine sales returns and reserves, rebate reserves, allowances for doubtful accounts, reserves for excess and obsolete inventory, investments in unconsolidated affiliates, workers' compensation liabilities, employee benefit related liabilities, deferred tax asset valuation allowances, any impairments of assets, forecasted transactions to be hedged, litigation reserves and contingencies.

        These matters that are subject to judgments and estimation are inherently uncertain, and different amounts could be reported using different assumptions and estimates. Management uses its best estimates and judgments in determining the appropriate amount to reflect in the financial statements, using historical experience and all available information. The Company also uses outside experts where appropriate. The Company applies estimation methodologies consistently from year to year.

        The Company believes the following are the critical accounting policies which could have the most significant effect on the Company's reported results and require subjective or complex judgments by management.

Revenue Recognition

        The Company recognizes revenue for sales when all of the following have occurred: an agreement of sale exists, product delivery and acceptance has occurred or services have been rendered, and collection is reasonably assured. In the case of certain products where the Company maintains consigned inventory at customer locations, revenue is recognized at the time the Company is notified that the customer has used the inventory. The Company enters into certain arrangements in which it commits to provide multiple elements to its customers. Revenue related to an individual element is deferred unless delivery of the element represents a separate earnings process. Total revenue for these arrangements is allocated among the elements based on the fair value of the individual elements, with the relative fair values determined based on objective evidence (generally based on sales of the individual element to other third parties). Management is required to make judgments about whether or not collectibility is reasonably assured.

        When the Company recognizes revenue from the sale of its products, an estimate of various sales returns and allowances is recorded which reduces product sales and accounts receivable. These adjustments include estimates for charge backs, rebates, returns, and other sales allowances. These provisions are estimated based upon historical payment experience, historical relationship to revenues, estimated customer inventory levels and current contract sales terms with wholesale and indirect customers. If the historical data and inventory estimates used to calculate these provisions does not properly reflect future activity, the Company's financial position, results of operations and cash flows could be impacted. The Company's estimates are subject to inherent limitations of estimates that rely on third-party data, as certain third-party information was itself in the form of estimates, and reflect other limitations.

37

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

        The Company records allowances for doubtful accounts based on customer-specific analysis and general matters such as current assessments of past due balances and economic conditions. Additional allowances for doubtful accounts may be required if there is deterioration in past due balances, if economic conditions are less favorable than the Company has anticipated or for customer-specific circumstances, such as financial difficulty. The allowance for doubtful accounts was $4.5 million and $5.1 million at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

Excess and Obsolete Inventory

        The Company records allowances for excess and obsolete inventory based on historical and estimated future demand and market conditions. Additional inventory allowances may be required if future demand or market conditions are less favorable than the Company has estimated. Inventory reserves result from inventory which is obsolete, nearing its expiration date (generally triggered at six months prior to expiration), or damaged or slow moving (defined as quantities in excess of a two year supply). The allowance for excess and obsolete inventory was $15.5 million and $8.5 million at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

Patent Costs

        The Company expenses legal costs incurred for patent preparation and applications. The Company capitalizes legal costs related to the defense and enforcement of issued patents for which success is deemed probable. The related costs are amortized over the remaining useful lives of the patents using the straight-line method. Such deferred costs are periodically reviewed for impairment and recoverability. To the extent the Company is successful in its defense and enforcement of its patents and receives compensation for past infringement, costs capitalized in connection with the specific defense or enforcement are expensed as an offset against any gain received.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

        As the Company's operations are comprised of one reporting unit, the Company reviews the recoverability of its goodwill by comparing the Company's fair value to the net book value of its assets. If the book value of the Company's assets exceeds the Company's fair value, the goodwill is written down to its implied fair value.

        Additionally, management reviews the carrying amounts of goodwill and other intangibles whenever events and circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of an asset may not be recoverable. Impairment indicators include, among other conditions, cash flow deficits, historic or anticipated declines in revenue or operating profit and adverse legal or regulatory developments. If it is determined that such indicators are present and the review indicates that the assets will not be fully recoverable, based on undiscounted estimated cash flows over the remaining amortization periods, their carrying values are reduced to estimated fair market value. Estimated fair market value is determined primarily using the anticipated cash flows discounted at a rate commensurate with the risk involved. For the purposes of identifying and measuring impairment, long-lived assets are grouped with other assets and liabilities at the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of the cash flows of other assets and liabilities.

Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates

        Investments in unconsolidated affiliates are designated as available-for-sale in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 115, "Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities." These investments are carried at fair market value, with unrealized gains and losses reported in stockholders' equity as Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss). Gains or losses on investments sold are

38

based on the specific identification method. The fair values of certain investments are based on quoted market prices. For other investments, various methods are used to estimate fair value, including external valuations and discounted cash flows. When the fair value of a certain investment declines below cost, management uses the following criteria to determine if such a decline should be considered other than temporary and result in a realized loss:

•

the duration and extent to which the market value has been less than cost;



•

the financial condition and near term prospects of the investee;



•

the reasons for the decline in market value;



•

the investee's performance against product development milestones; and



•

the Company's ability and intent to hold the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in market value.

Income Taxes

        The Company records a liability for potential tax assessments based on its estimate of the potential exposure. New laws and new interpretations of laws and rulings by tax authorities may affect the liability for potential tax assessments. Due to the subjectivity and complex nature of the underlying issues, actual payments or assessments may differ from estimates. To the extent the Company's estimates differ from actual payments or assessments, income tax expense is adjusted. Additional information regarding income taxes is included in Note 16 of the consolidated financial statements.

        The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes." Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the Company's financial statements or tax returns. At December 31, 2004, the Company had deferred tax assets of $130.5 million, partially offset by deferred tax liabilities of $60.9 million. The valuation allowance of $26.2 million as of December 31, 2004 reduces certain deferred tax assets to amounts that are more likely than not to be realized. This allowance primarily relates to the deferred tax assets established for certain investments and the net operating loss carryforwards of certain non-United States subsidiaries. The Company evaluates annually the realizability of its deferred tax assets by assessing its valuation allowance and by adjusting the amount of such allowance, if necessary. The factors used to assess the likelihood of realization are the Company's forecast of future taxable income and available tax planning strategies that could be implemented to realize the net deferred tax assets. Failure to achieve forecasted taxable income in the applicable taxing jurisdictions could affect the ultimate realization of deferred tax assets and could result in an increase in the Company's effective tax rate on future earnings.

39

Employee Stock Option and Stock Purchase Plans

        The Company applies the provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees," in accounting for its fixed stock option and employee stock purchase plans. In accordance with this intrinsic value method, no compensation expense is recognized for these plans. The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock Based Compensation," (in millions, except per share amounts):

        The per share weighted-average fair value for options granted during 2004, 2003 and 2002 was $11.96, $10.93, and $11.64, respectively. The fair value of each option was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:

        The pro forma expense for employee stock purchase subscriptions was calculated with the following weighted-average assumptions for grants during the following periods:

        The expected volatility assumptions for the stock option and stock purchase plans used in the Black-Scholes option pricing model is estimated on the date of each grant.

Effects of Recent Accounting Pronouncements

        In September 2004, the Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") issued EITF Abstract Issue No. 04-8 "The Effect of Contingently Convertible Debt on Diluted Earnings per Share." The abstract addresses when the dilutive effect of contingently convertible debt investments should be included in diluted earnings per share. This consensus is effective for reporting periods ending after December 15, 2004. Adoption of this consensus did not have an impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements but may have a minimal impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements in the future.

40

        In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, "Inventory Costs—an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4." This Statement amends the guidance in ARB No. 43, Chapter 4, "Inventory Pricing," to clarify the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted material (spoilage). This Statement is effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company does not expect adoption of this standard to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

        In December 2004, the FASB issued a revision of FASB Statement No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation." This Statement supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees," and its related implementation guidance. This Statement eliminates the alternative to use Opinion 25's intrinsic value method of accounting that was provided in Statement 123 as originally issued. Under Opinion 25, issuing stock options to employees generally resulted in recognition of no compensation cost. This Statement requires entities to recognize the cost of employee services received in exchange for awards of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of those awards (with limited exceptions). This revision is effective for the first interim or annual reporting period that begins after June 15, 2005. The Company is still assessing the impact that adoption of this standard will have on its consolidated financial statements; however, the Company believes that adoption of this standard will result in a charge to reported earnings.

Item 7A.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk

        The Company's business and financial results are affected by fluctuations in world financial markets, including currency exchange rates and interest rates. The Company's hedging policy attempts to manage these risks to an acceptable level based on management's judgment of the appropriate trade-off between risk, opportunity and costs.

        Edwards Lifesciences maintains an overall risk management strategy that utilizes a variety of interest rate and currency derivative financial instruments to mitigate its exposure to fluctuations in interest rates and currency exchange rates. The derivative instruments used include interest rate swaps, option-based products and forward currency contracts. The Company does not use any of these instruments for trading or speculative purposes. The total notional amounts of the Company's derivative financial instruments at December 31, 2004 and 2003 were $448.3 million and $567.6 million, respectively. The notional amounts of interest rate swap agreements, option-based products, and forward currency contracts do not represent amounts exchanged by the parties and, are not a measure of the Company's exposure through its use of derivatives.

Interest Rate Risk

        The Company utilizes interest rate swap agreements in managing its exposure to interest rate fluctuations. Interest rate swap agreements are executed as an integral part of specific debt transactions or on a portfolio basis. The Company's interest rate swap agreements involve agreements to pay a fixed rate and receive a floating rate, at specified intervals, calculated on an agreed-upon notional amount.

        As part of its overall risk-management program the Company performs sensitivity analyses to assess potential gains and losses in earnings and changes in fair values to hypothetical movements in interest rates. A 54 basis-point increase in interest rates (approximately 10 percent of the Company's weighted average interest rate) affecting the Company's financial instruments, including debt obligations and related derivatives and investments, would have an immaterial effect on the Company's annual interest expense.

Currency Risk

        The Company is primarily exposed to currency exchange-rate risk with respect to its transactions and net assets denominated in Japanese yen and the Euro. Business activities in various currencies

41

expose the Company to the risk that the eventual net United States dollar cash inflows resulting from transactions with foreign customers and suppliers denominated in foreign currencies may be adversely affected by changes in currency exchange rates. The Company manages these risks utilizing various types of foreign exchange contracts. The Company also enters into foreign exchange contracts to hedge anticipated, but not yet committed, sales expected to be denominated in foreign currencies. In addition, the Company hedges certain of its net investments in international affiliates. Such contracts hedge the United States dollar value of foreign currency denominated net assets from the effects of volatility in currency exchange rates by creating debt denominated in the respective currencies of the underlying net assets. Any changes in the carrying value of these net investments that are a result of fluctuations in currency exchange rates are offset by changes in the carrying value of the foreign currency denominated debt that are a result of the same fluctuations in currency exchange rates.

        As part of the strategy to manage risk while minimizing hedging costs, the Company utilizes both foreign currency forward exchange contracts and option-based products in managing its exposure to currency rate fluctuations. Option-based products consist of purchased put options and at times written (sold) call options to create collars. Option-based products are agreements that either grant the Company the right to receive, or require the Company to make payments at, specified currency rate levels.

        As part of its risk-management process, the Company uses a value-at-risk ("VAR") methodology in connection with other management tools to assess and manage its foreign currency financial instruments and measure any potential loss in earnings as a result of adverse movements in currency exchange rates. The Company utilizes a Monte Carlo simulation, with a 95 percent confidence level, using spot and three-month implied volatilities as stochastic variables and correlations (as of the measurement date) to estimate this potential loss. The Company's calculated VAR at December 31, 2004 and 2003, with a maturity of up to one year, is $5.0 million and $3.0 million, respectively. This amount excludes the potential effects of any changes in the value of the underlying transactions or balances. The Company's calculated VAR exposure represents an estimate of reasonably possible net losses that would be recognized on its portfolio of financial instruments assuming hypothetical movements in future market rates and is not necessarily indicative of actual results which may occur. It does not represent the maximum possible loss or any expected loss that may occur. Actual future gains or losses may differ from (and could be significantly greater than) these estimates based upon actual fluctuations in market rates, operating exposures and the timing thereof, and changes in the Company's portfolio of derivatives during the measured periods. In addition, the assumption within the VAR model is that changes in currency exchange rates are adverse, which may not be the case. Any loss incurred on the financial instruments is expected to be offset by the effects of currency movements on the hedging of all exposures; there may be currency exchange-rate gains or losses in the future.

Credit Risk

        Derivative financial instruments used by the Company involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk in the event a counter-party should default and market risk as the instruments are subject to rate and price fluctuations. Credit risk is managed through the use of credit standard guidelines, counter-party diversification, monitoring of counter-party financial condition and master-netting agreements in place with all derivative counter-parties. Credit exposure of derivative financial instruments is represented by the fair value effects of contracts with a positive fair value at December 31, 2004 reduced by the effects of master netting agreements. Additionally, at December 31, 2004, all derivative financial instruments, based on notional amounts, were with commercial banks and investment banking firms assigned investment grade ratings of "AA" or better by national rating agencies. The Company does not anticipate non-performance by its counter-parties and has no reserves related to non-performance as of December 31, 2004; the Company has not experienced any counterparty default during the four years ended December 31, 2004.

42

Concentrations of Credit Risk

        In the normal course of business, Edwards Lifesciences provides credit to customers in the health care industry, performs credit evaluations of these customers and maintains reserves for potential credit losses which, when realized, have been within the range of management's allowance for doubtful accounts during all periods presented.

        Sales to Baxter, acting in the capacity of the Company's distributor subsequent to the tax-free spin-off of Edwards Lifesciences from Baxter, represented approximately 8% of the Company's total net sales for 2002. Substantially all of these agreements had been terminated as of December 31, 2002. In 2004, the Company had no customers that represent greater than 10% of its total net sales or accounts receivable, net.

Investment Risk

        Edwards Lifesciences is exposed to investment risks related to changes in the fair values of its investments. The Company invests in equity instruments of public and private companies. These investments are classified in "Investments in unconsolidated affiliates" on the consolidated balance sheets.

        In 2002, the Company recorded a $67.4 million pretax charge related to the impairment of its investment in preferred stock of WorldHeart. The investment was written down to $6.2 million, which represented the value of the Company's preferred stock investment had it been converted into common stock at October 15, 2002. The decision to record the charge was based primarily on delays in WorldHeart's product development timelines, arising from its revised strategy. A further impairment of $4.7 million was charged in 2004 resulting from the decline in WorldHeart's stock price. Should WorldHeart fail to meet certain future development and financing milestones, further impairment charges may be necessary.

        In addition to the investment in WorldHeart ($1.5 million at December 31, 2004), Edwards Lifesciences had approximately $19.1 million of investments in equity instruments of other companies. At December 31, 2004, the Company had recorded unrealized losses of $4.5 million on these investments in "Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income," net of tax. Management considers these declines temporary in nature based upon the individual companies' operating results, financial condition and achievement of product development milestones. Should these companies experience a decline in financial condition or fail to meet certain development milestones, the decline in the investments' values may be considered other than temporary and impairment charges may be necessary.

Item 8.    Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Report of Management

        The management of Edwards Lifesciences is responsible for the integrity of the financial information presented in this Form 10-K. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Where necessary, they reflect estimates based on management's judgment.

        Management relies upon established accounting procedures and related systems of internal control for meeting its responsibilities to maintain reliable financial records. These systems are designed to provide reasonable assurance that assets are safeguarded and that transactions are properly recorded and executed in accordance with management's intentions. Internal auditors periodically review the accounting and control systems, and these systems are revised if and when weaknesses or deficiencies are found.

43

        The Audit and Public Policy Committee of the Board of Directors, composed of directors from outside the Company, meets regularly with management, the Company's internal auditors and its independent auditors to discuss audit scope and results, internal control evaluations, and other accounting, reporting and financial matters. The independent registered public accounting firm and internal auditors have access to the Audit and Public Policy Committee without management's presence.

44

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULE
DECEMBER 31, 2004

45

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders
of Edwards Lifesciences Corporation:

        We have completed an integrated audit of Edwards Lifesciences Corporation's (the "Company") 2004 consolidated financial statements and of its internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 and audits of its 2003 and 2002 consolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Our opinions, based on our audits, are presented below.

Consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule

        In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the accompanying index present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Edwards Lifesciences Corporation and its subsidiaries at December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule listed in the accompanying index presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit of financial statements includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Internal control over financial reporting

        Also, in our opinion, management's assessment, included in Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A, that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on those criteria. Furthermore, in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the COSO. The Company's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express opinions on management's assessment and on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We conducted our audit of internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. An audit of internal control over financial reporting includes obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management's assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we consider necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinions.

46

        A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

        Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Orange County, California
March 4, 2005

47

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in millions, except share data)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

48

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(in millions, except per share information)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

49

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in millions)