Back to GetFilings.com

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

For the fiscal year ended April 1, 2004
OR

For the transition period from                                  to                                 

Commission file number 1-8747

AMC ENTERTAINMENT INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (816) 221-4000

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None.

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý    No o

        Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ý

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ý    No o

        The approximate aggregate market value of the registrant's common stock held by non-affiliates as of October 2, 2003 based on the closing sale price on the American Stock Exchange on October 2, 2003 was approximately $454,974,674.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

        Portions of our Proxy Statement for use in connection with the 2004 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed are incorporated by reference into Part III of this report, to the extent set forth therein.

AMC ENTERTAINMENT INC.

FORM 10-K

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED APRIL 1, 2004

INDEX

Forward Looking Statements

        This report includes "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K regarding the prospects of our industry and our prospects, plans, financial position and business strategy may constitute forward-looking statements. In addition, forward-looking statements generally can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as "may," "will," "expect," "intend," "estimate," "anticipate," "plan," "foresee," "believe" or "continue" or the negatives of these terms or variations of them or similar terminology. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, we can give no assurance that these expectations will prove to have been correct. All such forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by the relevant forward-looking statement. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations include, among others: (i) our ability to enter into various financing programs; (ii) the cost and availability of films and the performance of films licensed by

2

us; (iii) competition; (iv) construction delays; (v) the ability to open or close theatres and screens as currently planned; (vi) the ability to sub-lease vacant retail space; (vii) domestic and international political, social and economic conditions; (viii) demographic changes; (ix) increases in the demand for real estate; (x) changes in real estate, zoning and tax laws; (xi) unforeseen changes in operating requirements; (xii) our ability to identify suitable acquisition candidates and successfully integrate acquisitions into our operations and (xiii) results of significant litigation. Readers are urged to consider these factors carefully in evaluating the forward-looking statements.

        All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by these cautionary statements. The forward-looking statements included herein are made only as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and we do not undertake any obligation to release publicly any revisions to such forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

Restatement of Financial Statements

        In connection with the annual audit of our consolidated financial statements, we, with the concurrence of our independent registered public accounting firm, determined that our financial statements for the years ended April 3, 2003 and March 28, 2002 as previously filed needed to be restated for the following items:

        Foreign deferred tax assets:    We had previously recorded valuation allowances against deferred tax assets in foreign jurisdictions when it became clear, based on theatre impairments or other factors, that we would not be profitable in those jurisdictions. We have now determined that full valuation allowances should be recorded against deferred tax assets in all foreign jurisdictions when it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

        Accordingly, we have restated our financial statements for the years ended April 3, 2003 and March 28, 2002 and the balance of retained earnings as of March 29, 2001 to reflect additional valuation allowances on foreign deferred tax assets. The effects of such adjustments are summarized as follows:

        Swedish tax benefits recorded in loss from discontinued operations:    In the third quarter of the year ended April 1, 2004, we recorded a $2.5 million U.S. federal income tax benefit generated from a worthless stock deduction relating to our Sweden operations which were sold in that quarter. We subsequently determined that the income tax benefit in the amount of $3.6 million should have been recorded in the year ended March 28, 2002 (the period in which the Sweden investment was restructured and became worthless).

        Additionally, in the year ended March 28, 2002, we recorded a deferred tax asset of $1.5 million for asset impairments in Sweden. We subsequently determined that the deferred tax asset should have been reserved with a full valuation allowance.

        Accordingly, we have restated our financial statements for the year ended March 28, 2002 to record the net effects of such adjustments. The net effects of such adjustments (which are recorded in loss from discontinued operations) are summarized as follows:

3

        Straight-line contingent rentals:    Rent expense for leases with rent escalation clauses are required to be recorded on a straight-line method under certain circumstances. We recently determined that we have one lease that has a clause for contingent rents in which case the contingency was virtually certain to occur. Rent expense for this lease should have been recorded on the straight-line method. Accordingly, we have restated our financial statements for the years ended April 3, 2003 and March 28, 2002 and the balance of retained earnings as of March 29, 2001 to reflect the straight-line method of recording the contingent portion of rent expense for this one lease. The effects of such adjustments are summarized as follows:

Consultation with Securities & Exchange Commission

        On March 24, 2004 we filed a registration statement on Form S-4 (Commission File No. 333-113911) with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"), which was amended on May 7, 2004 and incorporates by reference our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 3, 2003 and Form 8-K filed on February 17, 2004. The SEC Staff determined to review the registration statement and our periodic reports filed with the SEC identified above. As a result of the review of the periodic reports, the SEC Staff requested that we classify our Series A Convertible Preferred Stock outside of permanent equity into a temporary equity classification. We are currently engaged in technical discussions with the Office of the Chief Accountant of the SEC regarding the appropriate classification of our outstanding Series A Convertible Preferred Stock.

        In July 2001, the SEC Staff issued an Announcement which was codified as EITF Topic No. D-98. During fiscal 2002, we adopted Topic No. D-98 Classification and Measurement of Redeemable Securities. Topic No. D-98 provides guidance about determining when an equity security is redeemable at the option of the holder or upon the occurrence of an event that is solely within the control of the issuer. At the time of adoption of Topic No. D-98, there was no impact to our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Currently, we believe that Topic No. D-98 will not require our outstanding Series A Convertible Preferred Stock to be classified outside of permanent stockholders' equity until such time, if ever, that (i) the holders of our Preferred Stock either (a) are entitled to elect a majority of the board of directors or (b) could convert a portion of their Preferred Stock into a sufficient number of shares of common stock to gain control of the board of directors and (ii) our optional right to redeem the Preferred Stock is unconditional. Such circumstances do not presently exist and we believe should not exist prior to 2006, if ever. This conclusion is currently under discussion with the Staff of the SEC and is subject to change.

        The possible reclassification of our Series A Convertible Preferred Stock outside of permanent stockholders' equity would not, if made, have an impact on previously reported earnings, current earnings or related earnings per share.

        The impact to the financial statements if this reclassification were made, is as follows:

See note 7 to the consolidated financial statements.

4

PART I

Item 1. Business.

(a)   General Development of Business

        We are organized as a holding company. Our principal directly owned subsidiaries are American Multi-Cinema, Inc. ("AMC"), AMC Entertainment International, Inc. ("AMCEI") and National Cinema Network, Inc. ("NCN"). We conduct our North American theatrical exhibition business through AMC and its subsidiaries and AMCEI. We are operating theatres outside the United States through AMCEI and its subsidiaries. We engage in advertising services through NCN.

        Our predecessor was founded in Kansas City, Missouri in 1920. We were incorporated under the laws of the state of Delaware on June 13, 1983 and maintain our principal executive offices at 920 Main, Kansas City, Missouri 64105. Our telephone number at such address is (816) 221-4000.

        On March 15, 2002, we acquired the operations and related assets of Gulf States Theatres for a cash purchase price of approximately $45.8 million. The acquisition included five theatres with 68 screens in the New Orleans, Louisiana area. Operating results of the acquired theatres are included in our consolidated statements of operations from March 15, 2002.

        On March 29, 2002, we acquired GC Companies, Inc. ("GC Companies"), pursuant to the plan of reorganization of GC Companies which we sponsored, for a purchase price of approximately $168.9 million (net of $6.5 million from the sale of GC Companies' portfolio of venture capital investments on the effective date of the plan of reorganization). The acquisition included 66 theatres with 621 screens throughout the United States and a 50% interest in a joint venture that operates 17 theatres with 160 screens in Argentina, Chile, Brazil and Uruguay that is accounted for using the equity method. Operating results of the acquired theatres are included in our consolidated statements of operations from March 29, 2002.

        The purchase price for GC Companies includes estimated cash payments of $68.5 million, the issuance of $72.9 million of our 9¹/2% senior subordinated notes due 2011 with a fair value of $71.8 million and the issuance of $35. 2 million of our common stock, or 2.6 million shares based on a fair value of $13.64 per share (the closing price per share on the effective date of the plan of reorganization). See Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended April 1, 2004 for additional information regarding these acquisitions and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources" for additional information on payments that we might make under the plan of reorganization.

        On December 4, 2003, we sold our only theatre in Sweden and incurred a loss on sale of approximately $5.6 million, which included a payment of approximately $5.3 million to the purchaser. We opened our theatre in Sweden during fiscal 2001, and since that time we have incurred pre-tax losses of approximately $17.2 million, including an impairment charge of approximately $4.7 million in fiscal 2002 and a loss on sale of approximately $5.6 million in fiscal 2004. The operations and cash flows of the Sweden theatre have been eliminated from our ongoing operations as a result of the disposal transaction, and we do not have any significant continuing involvement in the operations of the Sweden theatre. The results of operations of the Sweden theatre have been classified as discontinued operations, and information presented for all periods reflects the new classification. The operations of the Sweden theatre were previously reported in our International operations segment.

        On December 19, 2003, we acquired certain of the operations and related assets of MegaStar Cinemas, L.L.C. ("MegaStar") for an estimated cash purchase price of approximately $15.0 million. The acquisition included three theatres with 48 screens in the Minneapolis, Minnesota and Atlanta, Georgia areas. Operating results of the acquired theatres are included in our consolidated statements of operations from December 19, 2003.

5

(b)   Financial Information about Segments

        For information about our operating segments, see Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II Item 8. of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

(c)   Narrative Description of Business

        We are one of the world's leading theatrical exhibition companies based on revenues. As of April 1, 2004, we operated 232 theatres with a total of 3,544 screens, with 93%, or 3,306, of our screens in North America, and 7%, or 238, of our screens in China (Hong Kong), Japan, France, Portugal, Spain and the United Kingdom. For the 52 weeks ended April 1, 2004, we had revenues of $1.8 billion, a net loss of $10.7 million and net cash provided by operating activities of $183.3 million.

        Our North American and International theatrical exhibition revenues are generated primarily from box office admissions and theatre concession sales, which represented approximately 68% and 26%, respectively, of our revenues during the 52 weeks ended April 1, 2004. The balance of our revenues is generated from ancillary sources, including on-screen advertising, rental of theatre auditoriums, fees and other revenues generated from the sale of gift certificates and theatre tickets and arcade games located in theatre lobbies.

Our Competitive Strengths

        Key characteristics of our business that we believe differentiate us from and give us a competitive advantage over many other theatrical exhibition companies are:

•

our modern theatre circuit;



•

our highly productive theatres; and



•

our broad major market coverage with prime theatre locations.

        Modern Theatre Circuit.    We are an industry leader in the development and operation of megaplex theatres, typically defined as having 14 or more screens and offering amenities to enhance the movie-going experience, such as stadium seating providing unobstructed viewing, digital sound and enhanced seat design. We believe that the megaplex format provides the operator with enhanced revenue opportunities and better asset utilization while creating convenience for patrons by increasing film choice and the number of film starting times. We believe that our introduction of the megaplex in 1995 has led to the current industry replacement cycle, which has accelerated the obsolescence of older, smaller theatres by setting new standards for moviegoers. We continually upgrade the quality of our theatre circuit by adding new screens through new builds (including expansions) and acquisitions and by disposing of older screens through closures and sales. From April 1995 through April 1, 2004, we added 111 theatres with 2,343 new screens, acquired 80 theatres with 786 screens and disposed of 191 theatres with 1,215 screens. As of April 1, 2004, approximately 73%, or 2,597, of our screens were located in megaplex theatres. As of April 1, 2004, our average number of screens per theatre was 15.3, which we believe was the highest among the major North America theatre exhibitors and indicative of the extent to which we have developed our theatre circuit, compared with 6.2 (according to the National Association of Theatre Operators) for all North America theatrical exhibition companies.

        Highly Productive Theatres.    Our theatres are generally among the most productive in the markets in which they operate. As measured by AC Nielsen EDI, Inc. ("EDI"), we operated 22 of the top 50 theatres in the United States in terms of box office revenues for the 52 weeks ended April 1, 2004. Our next closest competitor operated nine. Our theatre circuit in North America also produces box office revenues per screen at rates approximately 30% higher than the industry average, as measured by EDI.

6

        Broad Major Market Coverage with Prime Theatre Locations.    In addition to our asset quality and the high levels of productivity of our theatres, our theatres are generally located in large, urban markets, giving us a breadth of market coverage that places us in most major markets in the United States. We operate in 88% of the Top 25 "Designated Market Areas", or "DMAs" (television market areas as defined by EDI). Our theatres are usually located near or within developments that include retail stores, restaurants and other activities that complement the movie-going experience.

        The following table provides detail with respect to the geographic location of our theatre circuit as of April 1, 2004:

*

Excludes 17 theatres with 160 screens in South America operated through a 50% owned unconsolidated joint venture.

7

        The following table sets forth information concerning new builds (including expansions), acquisitions and dispositions and end of period theatres and screens operated.

*

Excludes 17 theatres with 160 screens in South America operated through a 50% owned unconsolidated joint venture.

Our Strategy

        Our strategic plan has three principal elements:

•

maximizing operating efficiencies by focusing on the fundamentals of our business;



•

optimizing our theatre portfolio through selective new builds, acquisitions and disposition of underperforming theatres; and



•

enhancing and extending our business and brands and in doing so, growing our ancillary revenues.

        Maximizing Operating Efficiencies.    We believe the fundamentals of our business include maximizing revenues and managing our costs. For example, since fiscal 1999 we have implemented key initiatives in each of these areas, which have resulted in the following:

•

theatre revenues per patron increased 11.4% in fiscal 2000, 5.5% in fiscal 2001, 5.6% in fiscal 2002, 7.0% in fiscal 2003 and 5.6% in fiscal 2004, which resulted in a per patron increase of greater than $2.50 over this period; and



•

general and administrative expenses: other, declined from 5.1% of revenues in fiscal 1999 to 3.0% in fiscal 2004, the result of centralizing divisional operational structure and reducing staffing above the theatre level by approximately 30%.

        We continue to evaluate opportunities for further revenue and cost savings in these and other areas.

        Optimizing Our Theatre Portfolio.    Asset quality is a function of our selective new build, acquisition and theatre disposition strategies.

        As a recognized leader in the development and operation of megaplex theatres and based upon our financial resources, we believe that we will continue to have attractive new build opportunities presented to us by real estate developers and others. We intend to selectively pursue new build opportunities where the characteristics of the location and the overall market meet our strategic and financial return criteria. As of April 1, 2004, we had three theatres with 44 screens under construction in the United States. Since April 1995, we have added 2,343 screens in high performing state-of-the-art theatres.

        We believe that a major factor that further differentiates us from our competitors and has contributed to our overall theatre portfolio quality has been our proactive efforts to close older, underperforming theatres. Since fiscal 1995, our last fiscal year before the first megaplex theatre opened, we have disposed

8

of 1,215 screens. In order to maintain a modern, high quality theatre circuit, we will continue to evaluate our theatre portfolio and, where appropriate, dispose of theatres through closures, lease terminations, lease buyouts, sales or subleases. We have identified 19 multiplex theatres with 162 screens that we may close over the next one to three years due to expiration of leases or early lease terminations.

        There are approximately 600 theatrical exhibitors in North America, and the top five exhibitors account for approximately 50% of the industry's screens. This statistic is up from 31% in 1999 and evidences that the theatrical exhibition business in North America has been consolidating. We played a key role in this consolidation process in 2002, 2003 and 2004 by acquiring three domestic theatre operators with a total of 757 screens.

        Enhancing and Extending Our Business and Brands.    We believe there are opportunities to increase our core and ancillary revenues and build brand equity through enhancements of our business, new product offerings and strategic marketing. For example:

•

we provide on-screen advertising and lobby marketing to over 7,500 screens through our wholly-owned subsidiary, National Cinema Network, Inc., or NCN, one of the nation's leading cinema advertising companies;



•

our MovieWatcher® frequent moviegoer loyalty program is the largest program in the industry with over 3.5 million members;



•

we are a founding partner and own approximately 27% of MovieTickets.com, an Internet ticketing venture representing over 7,000 screens, including our own;



•

we are currently installing into our theatres (approximately 2,500 screens) The Digital Theatre Distribution System^SM, a digital projection technology developed by NCN that streamlines the delivery of in theatre advertising and is also suitable for alternative content;



•

during fiscal 2003, we introduced the AMC Entertainment Card, the first stored value gift card sold circuit wide in our industry. Through several marketing alliances, the card is also sold at over 5,000 retail outlets throughout North America; and



•

we recently introduced Clip Gummi Stars™, the industry's first wide-scale, privately labeled candy, in our U.S. theatres. The introduction of Clip Gummi Stars™ is part of our overall brand strategy to extend our powerful name and guest loyalty to other products and programs, both inside and outside our theatres.

Film Licensing

        We predominantly license "first-run" motion pictures from distributors owned by major film production companies and from independent distributors. We license films on a film-by-film and theatre-by-theatre basis. We obtain these licenses based on several factors, including number of seats and screens available for a particular picture, revenue potential and the location and condition of our theatres. We pay rental fees on a negotiated basis.

        North American film distributors typically establish geographic film licensing zones and generally allocate available film to one theatre within that zone. Film zones generally encompass a radius of three to five miles in metropolitan and suburban markets, depending primarily upon population density. In film zones where we are the sole exhibitor, we obtain film licenses by selecting a film from among those offered and negotiating directly with the distributor. In film zones where there is competition, a distributor generally will allocate its films among the exhibitors in the zone. As of April 1, 2004, approximately 82% of our screens in the United States were located in non-competitive film zones.

        Licenses that we enter into typically state that rental fees are based on either firm terms established prior to the opening of the picture or on a mutually agreed settlement upon the conclusion of the picture

9

run. Under a firm terms formula, we pay the distributor a specified percentage of box office receipts, with the percentages declining over the term of the run. Firm term film rental fees are generally the greater of (i) 70% of box office admissions, gradually declining to as low as 30% over a period of four to seven weeks versus (ii) a specified percentage (i.e. 90%) of the excess of box office receipts over a negotiated allowance for theatre expenses (commonly known as a 90-10 clause). The settlement process allows for negotiation based upon how a film actually performs. A firm term agreement could result in lower than anticipated film rent percentage if the film outperforms expectations, especially in regards to length of run, and, conversely, there is a downside risk when the film underperforms.

        There are several distributors which provide a substantial portion of quality first-run motion pictures to the exhibition industry. These include Buena Vista Pictures (Disney), Paramount Pictures, Universal Pictures, Warner Bros. Distribution, New Line Cinema, SONY Pictures Releasing, Miramax, MGM, Twentieth Century Fox and DreamWorks. Films licensed from these distributors accounted for approximately 92% of our North American admissions revenues during fiscal 2004. Our revenues attributable to individual distributors may vary significantly from year to year depending upon the commercial success of each distributor's motion pictures in any given year. In fiscal 2004, no single distributor accounted for more than 6% of the motion pictures that we licensed or for more than 15% of our box office admissions.

        During the period from 1990 to 2003, the annual number of first-run motion pictures released by distributors in the United States ranged from a low of 370 in 1995 to a high of 490 in 1998, according to the Motion Picture Association of America. During 2003, 459 first-run motion pictures were released by distributors in the United States.

Concessions

        Concessions sales are our second largest source of revenue after box office admissions. Concessions items include popcorn, soft drinks, candy, hot dogs and other products. Different varieties of candy and soft drinks are offered at our theatres based on preferences in that particular geographic region. We have also implemented "combo-meals" for patrons which offer a pre-selected assortment of concessions products and offer co-branded and private label products that are unique to us.

        Our strategy emphasizes prominent and appealing concessions counters designed for rapid service and efficiency. We design our megaplex theatres to have more concessions capacity to make it easier to serve larger numbers of customers. In addition, our megaplexes generally feature the "pass-through" concept, which enables the concessionist serving patrons to simply sell concessions items instead of also preparing them, thus providing more rapid service to customers. Strategic placement of large concessions stands within theatres heightens their visibility, aids in reducing the length of lines, allows flexibility to introduce new concepts and improves traffic flow around the concessions stands.

        We negotiate prices for our concessions products and supplies directly with concessions vendors on a national or regional basis to obtain high volume discounts or bulk rates and marketing incentives.

Theatre Management and Support

        We use a centralized structure for policy development, strategic planning, asset management, marketing, human resources, finance, accounting and information systems. These systems are managed at our corporate office located in Kansas City, Missouri. All U.S. film licensing activity occurs in Woodland Hills, California.

        We staff our theatres with personnel capable of making day-to-day operating decisions. A portion of management's compensation at each theatre is linked to the operating results of that theatre. All theatre level personnel complete formal training programs to maximize both customer service and the efficiency of our operations. Theatre managers receive market-based training within their first 18 months with us which focuses on operations administration, marketing and information systems interpretation.

10

        Theatre staffing varies depending on the size and configuration of the theatre and levels of attendance. For example, a typical 10-screen movie theatre may have four managers with 50 associates while a megaplex theatre may have eight managers and 125 associates. We are committed to developing the strongest possible management teams and seek college graduates for career management positions.

Employees

        As of April 1, 2004, we had approximately 1,200 full-time and 16,000 part-time employees. Approximately 1.5% of our part-time employees were minors that were paid the minimum wage.

        Fewer than 2% of our domestic employees, consisting primarily of motion picture projectionists, are represented by a union, the International Alliance of Theatrical Stagehand Employees and Motion Picture Machine Operators (and affiliated local unions). We believe that our relationship with this union is satisfactory.

Theatrical Exhibition Industry and Competition

        Motion picture theatres are the primary initial distribution channel for new motion picture releases and we believe that the theatrical success of a motion picture is often the most important factor in establishing its value in the DVD/videocassette, cable television and other ancillary markets. We believe that the emergence of alternative motion picture distribution channels has not adversely affected attendance at theatres and that these distribution channels do not provide an experience comparable to the out-of-home entertainment experience offered by moviegoing. We believe that the public will continue to recognize the value of viewing a movie on a large screen with superior audio and visual quality, while enjoying a variety of concessions and sharing the experience with a larger audience.

        Moviegoing has demonstrated steady growth, with North American box office revenues increasing by a 6% Compound Annual Growth Rate ("CAGR") over the last 30 years. Since the introduction of the megaplex in 1995, these positive growth trends have become more pronounced, with box office revenues growing by a 7% CAGR from 1995 to 2003. In 2003, industry box office revenues were $9.5 billion, a decrease of less than 1% from the prior year, and attendance was 1.57 billion, a decrease of 4% from the prior year but the second highest attendance level in 44 years.

        As a result of the economic appeal of megaplex theatres and exhibitors' development of new megaplexes without a corresponding closure of older multiplexes, from 1995 to 1999 the industry's indoor screen count grew by a CAGR of 8%, from 27,000 to 36,500 screens. However, attendance per screen declined during this period by a CAGR of 4%. We believe that this decline reflects the industry's excess screen capacity, in which older multiplexes or less competitively positioned theatres were effectively rendered obsolete by newer megaplexes, resulting in declining profitability.

        In 2003, there were approximately 1,300 fewer screens than in 1999, which had the highest number of screens in the past nine years, as many of our competitors closed older multiplexes. As a result, from 1999 to 2003 the industry's screen count decreased by a CAGR of 1% and attendance per screen increased during this period by a CAGR of 1%.

11

        The following table represents information about the exhibition industry obtained from the National Association of Theatre Owners and Motion Picture Association 2003 MPA Market Statistics.

        There are approximately 600 companies competing in the North American theatrical exhibition industry, approximately 300 of which operate four or more screens. Industry participants vary substantially in size, from small independent operators to large international chains. Based on information obtained from the National Association of Theatre Owners 2003-04 Encyclopedia of Exhibition, we believe that the ten largest exhibitors (in terms of number of screens) operated approximately 62% of the indoor screens in 2003.

        Our theatres are subject to varying degrees of competition in the geographic areas in which they operate. Competition is often intense with respect to attracting patrons, licensing motion pictures and finding new theatre sites. Where real estate is readily available, there are few barriers preventing another company from opening a theatre near one of our theatres, which may adversely effect operations at our theatre.

        The theatrical exhibition industry faces competition from other forms of out-of-home entertainment, such as concerts, amusement parks and sporting events, and from other distribution channels for filmed entertainment, such as cable television, pay per view and home video systems, as well as from all other forms of entertainment.

Regulatory Environment

        The distribution of motion pictures is, in large part, regulated by federal and state antitrust laws and has been the subject of numerous antitrust cases. The consent decrees resulting from one of those cases, to which we were not a party, have a material impact on the industry and us. Those consent decrees bind certain major motion picture distributors and require the motion pictures of such distributors to be offered and licensed to exhibitors, including us, on a film-by-film and theatre-by-theatre basis. Consequently, we cannot assure ourselves of a supply of motion pictures by entering into long-term arrangements with major distributors, but must compete for our licenses on a film-by-film and theatre-by-theatre basis.

        Our theatres must comply with Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (the "ADA"). Compliance with the ADA requires that public accommodations "reasonably accommodate" individuals with disabilities and that new construction or alterations made to "commercial facilities" conform to accessibility guidelines unless "structurally impracticable" for new construction or technically infeasible for alterations. Non-compliance with the ADA could result in the imposition of injunctive relief, fines, awards of damages to private litigants or additional capital expenditures to remedy such noncompliance. Although we believe that our theatres are in substantial compliance with the ADA, in January 1999, the Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice filed suit against us alleging that certain of our theatres with stadium-style seating violate the ADA. See "Legal Proceedings" under Part I Item 3. of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

        As an employer covered by the ADA, we must make reasonable accommodations to the limitations of employees and qualified applicants with disabilities, provided that such reasonable accommodations do not

12

pose an undue hardship on the operation of our business. In addition, many of our employees are covered by various government employment regulations, including minimum wage, overtime and working conditions regulations.

        Our operations also are subject to federal, state and local laws regulating such matters as construction, renovation and operation of theatres as well as wages and working conditions, citizenship, health and sanitation requirements and licensing. We believe our theatres are in material compliance with such requirements.

        We also own and operate theatres and other properties which may be subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to environmental protection. Certain of these laws and regulations may impose joint and several liability on certain statutory classes of persons for the costs of investigation or remediation of contamination, regardless of fault or the legality of original disposal. We believe our theatres are in material compliance with such requirements.

Seasonality

        Our revenues are dependent upon the timing of motion picture releases by distributors. The most marketable motion pictures are usually released during the summer and the year-end holiday seasons. Therefore, our business can be seasonal, with higher attendance and revenues generally occurring during the summer months and holiday seasons. Our results of operations may vary significantly from quarter to quarter.

(d)   Financial Information About Geographic Areas

        For information about the geographic areas in which we operate, see Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II Item 8. of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. During fiscal 2004, revenues from our theatre operations outside the United States accounted for 9.5% of our total revenues. Our North American operations include megaplexes in Canada as well. There are significant differences between the theatrical exhibition industry in the United States and in these international markets. These include:

•

Fluctuating currency values.  For information about our exposure to foreign currency exchange rates, see Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk under Part II Item 7A. of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



•

Consumer preferences; insufficient foreign language films.  Consumers in international markets may be less inclined to spend their leisure time attending movies than consumers in North America. In addition, there is generally a smaller market for local language films, and the overall supply of these films may not be adequate to generate a sufficient attendance level at our international theatres. As a result of such factors, attendance levels at some of our foreign theatres may not be sufficient to permit us to operate them on a positive cash flow basis.



•

Inability to obtain film product.  Because of existing relationships between distributors and other theatre owners, we sometimes have been unable to obtain the films we want for our theatres in certain foreign markets.

        Other risks associated with our foreign operations include:

•

unexpected changes in tariffs and other trade barriers;



•

changes in foreign government regulations;



•

inflation;



•

price, wage and exchange controls;



•

reduced protection for intellectual property rights in some countries;



•

licensing requirements;

13

•

potential adverse tax consequences; and



•

uncertain political and economic environments.

        There are also other risks that may limit or disrupt motion picture exhibition and markets, restrict the movement of funds or result in the deprivation of contract rights or the taking of property by nationalization or appropriation without fair compensation. Such differences in industry structure and regulatory and trade practices may adversely affect our ability to expand internationally or to operate at a profit following such expansion.

(e)   Available Information.

        We make available on our web site (www.amctheatres.com) under "Investor Resources—SEC Filings", free of charge, our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file or furnish such material with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Item 2. Properties.

        The following table sets forth the general character and ownership classification of our theatre circuit as of April 1, 2004:

        Our theatre leases generally have initial terms ranging from 10 to 25 years, with options to extend the lease for up to 20 additional years. The leases typically require escalating minimum annual rent payments and additional rent payments based on a percentage of the leased theatre's revenue above a base amount and require us to pay for property taxes, maintenance, insurance and certain other property-related expenses. In some instances our escalating minimum annual rent payments are contingent upon increases in the consumer price index. In some cases, our rights as tenant are subject and subordinate to the mortgage loans of lenders to our lessors, so that if a mortgage were to be foreclosed, we could lose our lease. Historically, this has never occurred.

        We lease our corporate headquarters in Kansas City, Missouri, our film licensing office in Woodland Hills, California (Los Angeles) and our administrative offices in Paris, France and Tokyo, Japan.

        The majority of the concessions, projection, seating and other equipment required for each of our theatres is owned.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

        Jose Vargas and Maria Victoria Vargas v. R.K. Butler and EPT DOWNREIT II and American Multi-Cinema, Inc. d/b/a AMC Theatres Studio 30 and Houston Police Department (No. 2003 - 61045 filed in the District Court of Harris County, Texas). On November 3, 2003, Jose Vargas and Maria Victoria Vargas as beneficiaries of Jose Vargas, Jr. filed a wrongful death action seeking damages related to the death of their minor son. The case arises from a shooting death that occurred approximately one and a half blocks away from the premises of the AMC Studio 30 in Houston, Texas on October 31, 2003. The Vargas youth was shot by a Houston Police officer who was working as an off-duty security officer at the AMC Studio 30. The Vargas youth had been driving around the AMC parking lot with friends in an automobile prior to the shooting. The plaintiffs are seeking unspecified damages on a variety of legal theories.

14

        United States of America v. AMC Entertainment Inc. and American Multi-Cinema, Inc. (No. 99-01034 FMC (SHx), filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California). On January 29, 1999 the Department of Justice (the "Department") filed suit alleging that our stadium-style theatres violate the ADA and related regulations. The Department alleges that we have failed to provide persons in wheelchairs seating arrangements with lines of sight comparable to the general public. The Department alleges various non-line of sight violations as well. The Department seeks declaratory and injunctive relief regarding existing and future theatres with stadium-style seating, compensatory damages in the approximate amount of $75,000 and a civil penalty of $110,000.

        On November 20, 2002, the trial court entered summary judgment in favor of the Department on the line of sight aspects of the case. The trial court ruled that wheelchair spaces located solely on the sloped floor portion of the stadium-style auditoriums fail to provide lines of sight comparable to the general public. The trial court did not address specific changes that might be required of our existing stadium-style auditoriums, holding that per se rules are simply not possible because the requirements of comparable lines of sight will vary based on theatre layout. We filed a request for interlocutory appeal on January 23, 2003. The trial court denied our request but postponed any further line of sight proceedings pending the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals' ruling in a case with similar facts and issues, Oregon Paralyzed Veterans of America v. Regal Cinemas, Inc. In Regal, the Oregon District Court held that the exhibitor had provided comparable lines of sight to its wheelchair-bound patrons. On August 13, 2003, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the decision of the Oregon District Court. Regal filed its petition for certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court on October 27, 2003. The Supreme Court is expected to grant or deny certiorari as early as this summer. The Company's line of sight proceedings are postponed pending Regal's outcome before the Supreme Court.

        On January 21, 2003, the trial court entered summary judgment in favor of the Department on non-line of sight aspects of the case, which involve such matters as parking areas, signage, ramps, location of toilets, counter heights, ramp slopes, companion seating and the location and size of handrails. In its non-line of sight decision, the trial court concluded that we have violated numerous sections of the ADA and engaged in a pattern and practice of violating the ADA.

        On December 5, 2003 a consent order and final judgment on non-line of sight issues was entered by the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. The consent order and final judgment resolves matters regarding the non-line of sight aspects of the case. Under the terms of the consent order and final judgment, we have agreed to remedy certain violations at twelve of our stadium-style theatres surveyed by the Department. Additionally, we have agreed to survey and make similar improvements at 101 stadium-style theatres across the country and at certain theatres we may open or acquire in the future. We estimate that the cost of these betterments will be $21.0 million, which is expected to be incurred over the term of the consent order of five years. The estimate is based on the improvements at the twelve theatres surveyed by the Department. The actual cost of betterments may vary based on the results of surveys of the remaining theatres.

        Kevin Ball, et al. v. AMC Entertainment Inc. and Loews Cineplex Entertainment Corp. (Case No. 1:00CV00867, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia), was a purported class action lawsuit on behalf of hearing impaired persons that involves theatres only in the District of Columbia area. The Ball suit sought to have AMC install closed-captioning in several screens at several theatres in the D.C. area, which we estimate would cost approximately $96,000 in the aggregate. AMC and Loews have each agreed to a settlement that would require the installation of closed-captioning in six theatre screens in the D.C. area and the payment by each of AMC and Loews of approximately $130,000 for plaintiff's legal fees. The Court approved the settlement on April 30, 2004.

        American Multi-Cinema, Inc. v. Midwest Drywall Company, Inc., Haskell Constructors, Ltd. et al. (Case No. 00CV84908, Circuit Court of Platte County, Missouri) and American Multi-Cinema, Inc. v. Bovis Construction Corp. et al. (Civil Action No. 0207139, Court of Common Pleas of Bucks County, Pennsylvania). We are plaintiffs in these and related suits in which we seek to recover damages from the construction manager, the architect, certain fireproofing applicators and other parties to correct the

15

defective application of certain fireproofing materials at 23 theatres. We currently estimate our claim for repair costs at these theatres will aggregate approximately $36.1 million, of which we have expended approximately $23.4 million through the end of fiscal 2004. The remainder is for projected costs of repairs yet to be performed. We also are seeking additional damages for lost profits, interest and legal and other expenses incurred.

        Certain parties to the Missouri litigation have filed counterclaims against us, including Ammon Painting Company, Inc. which asserts claims to recover monies for services provided in an amount not specified in the pleadings but which it has expressed in discovery to aggregate to approximately $950,000. We currently estimate that our claim against Ammon is for approximately $6.0 million. Based on presently available information, we do not believe such matters will have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or liquidity. During the fifty-two weeks ended April 1, 2004 we received settlement payments of $925,000 related to two theatres from various parties in connection with this matter. On May 18, 2004, we received additional settlement payments of $2,310,020 from various parties in connection with this matter.

        We are a party to various other legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business, none of which is expected to have a material adverse effect on us.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

        There has been no submission of matters to a vote of security holders during the thirteen weeks ended April 1, 2004.

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters.

        Our common equity consists of Common Stock and Class B Stock. Our Common Stock is traded on the American Stock Exchange under the symbol AEN. There is no established public trading market for Class B Stock.

        The table below sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low closing prices of our Common Stock as reported on the American Stock Exchange composite tape.

Common Stock

        On May 7, 2004, there were 2,572 stockholders of record of Common Stock and one stockholder of record (the 1992 Durwood, Inc. Voting Trust dated December 12, 1992) of Class B Stock.

        Our Certificate of Incorporation provides that holders of Common Stock and Class B Stock shall receive, pro rata per share, such cash dividends as may be declared from time to time by the Board of Directors. Under an Investment Agreement dated April 19, 2001 (the "Investment Agreement") with the initial purchasers of our Preferred Stock, we may not pay dividends on Common Stock except with the consent of the initial purchasers for so long as they continue to beneficially own 50% of the aggregate number of shares of Preferred Stock issued pursuant to the Investment Agreement, subject to certain limited exceptions.

        We have not declared a dividend on shares of Common Stock or Class B Stock since fiscal 1989. Any payment of cash dividends on Common Stock or Class B Stock in the future will be at the discretion of the

16

Board and subject to the consent of the initial purchasers of our preferred stock and will also depend upon such factors as compliance with debt covenants, earnings levels, capital requirements, our financial condition and other factors deemed relevant by the Board.

Issuer Purchase of Equity Securities

        The following table provides repurchases of the Company's stock by month during fiscal 2004:

^(a)

Shares received by AMC Entertainment subsidiary, NCN, in satisfaction of debts owed to NCN by General Cinemas as directed by the bankruptcy court.

^(b)

Shares sold by participants receiving restricted stock awards under the 1999 Plan who elected to satisfy their tax obligation on vested shares by selling a portion of their vested restricted stock awards to the Company.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data.

        We have restated our consolidated financial statements for foreign deferred tax assets, Swedish tax benefits recorded in loss from discontinued operations and straight-line contingent rentals. See Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements.

17

        The following summary of selected financial data has been revised to reflect the restatements. See Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements under Restatements, included under Part II Item 8. of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for a complete discussion of the restatement and the restatement adjustments for fiscal years 2003 and 2002. See note (7) below for a complete discussion of the restatement and the restatement adjustments for fiscal years 2001 and 2000.

18

⁽¹⁾

There were no cash dividends declared on common stock during the last five fiscal years.

⁽²⁾

Fiscal 2004, 2003, 2002 and 2001 include losses from discontinued operations related to a theatre in Sweden that was sold during fiscal 2004. Fiscal 2004 includes a $3,831 loss from discontinued operations (net of income tax benefit of $2,600) which increased loss per share by $0.11 per share of common stock, fiscal 2003 includes a $1,084 loss from discontinued operations (net of income tax benefit of $700) which increased loss per share by $0.03 per share of common stock, fiscal 2002 includes a $4,325 loss from discontinued operations including a charge for impairment of long-lived assets of $4,668 (net of income tax benefit of $3,600) which increased loss per share by $0.18 per share of common stock and fiscal 2001 includes a $1,070 loss from discontinued operations (net of income tax benefit of $0) which increased loss per share by $0.05 per share of common stock.

⁽³⁾

Fiscal 2001 includes a $15,760 cumulative effect of an accounting change related to revenue recognition for gift certificates and discounted theatre tickets (net of income tax benefit of $10,950), which reduced earnings per share by $0.67 per share of common stock. Fiscal 2000 includes a $5,840 cumulative effect of an accounting change for preopening expenses (net of income tax benefit of $4,095), which reduced earnings per share by $0.25 per share of common stock.

⁽⁴⁾

Fiscal 2003 includes 53 weeks. All other years have 52 weeks.

⁽⁵⁾

We acquired Gulf States Theatres on March 15, 2002 and GC Companies, Inc. on March 29, 2002, which significantly increased our size. In the Gulf States Theatres acquisition, we acquired 5 theatres with 68 screens in the New Orleans area. In the GC Companies acquisition, we acquired 66 theatres with 621 screens throughout the United States. Accordingly, results of operations for the fiscal years ended April 1, 2004 and April 3, 2003 are not comparable to our results for the prior fiscal years.

⁽⁶⁾

During fiscal 2004, other expense (income) is composed of losses recognized on the redemption of $200,000 of our Senior Subordinated Notes due 2009 and $83,400 of our Senior Subordinated Notes due 2011. During fiscal 2002, other expense (income) is comprised of transaction expenses incurred in connection with the issuance of Preferred Stock. During fiscal 2001 other expense (income) includes non-cash income related to the extinguishment of gift certificate liabilities for multiple years of sales.

⁽⁷⁾

In connection with the annual audit of our consolidated financial statements, we, with the concurrence of our independent registered public accounting firm, determined that our financial statements for the years ended March 29, 2001 and March 30, 2000 as previously filed needed to be restated for the following items:

Foreign deferred tax assets:    We had previously recorded valuation allowances against deferred tax assets in foreign jurisdictions when it became clear, based on theatre impairments or other factors, that we would not be profitable in those jurisdictions. We have now determined that full valuation allowances should be recorded against deferred tax assets in all foreign jurisdictions when it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

19

Accordingly, we have restated our financial statements for the years ended March 29, 2001 and March 30, 2000 and the balance of retained earnings as of April 1, 1999 to reflect additional valuation allowances on foreign deferred tax assets. The effects of such adjustments are summarized as follows:

Straight-line contingent rentals:    Rent expense for leases with rent escalation clauses are required to be recorded on a straight-line method under certain circumstances. We recently determined that we have one lease that has a clause for contingent rents in which case the contingency was virtually certain to occur. Rent expense for this lease should have been recorded on the straight-line method. Accordingly, we have restated our financial statements for the years ended March 29, 2001 and March 30, 2000 and the balance of retained earnings as of March 29, 2001 to reflect the straight-line method of recording the contingent portion of rent expense for this one lease. The effects of such adjustments are summarized as follows:

        The restatement adjustments affecting the Statement of Operations Data for fiscal years 2001 and 2000 are set forth in the following table (in thousands):

        The restatement adjustments affecting the Balance Sheet Data for fiscal years 2002, 2001 and 2000 are set forth in the following table (in thousands):

*

The Stockholders' equity previously reported at March 30, 2000 of $58,669 has been restated to equity of $54,669, which is a decrease of $4,000, to reflect the effect of the restatement adjustments relating to deferred tax asset valuation allowances for the periods prior to fiscal 2001. Such cumulative adjustments also had the corresponding effect of decreasing deferred income taxes (long-term) by $4,000.

20

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Overview

        We are one of the world's leading theatrical exhibition companies based on revenues. As of April 1, 2004, we operated 232 theatres with a total of 3,544 screens, with 93%, or 3,306, of our screens in North America, and 7%, or 238, of our screens in China (Hong Kong), Japan, France, Portugal, Spain and the United Kingdom.

        We are organized as a holding company. Our principal directly owned subsidiaries are American Multi-Cinema, Inc., AMC Entertainment International, Inc. ("AMCEI") and National Cinema Network, Inc. ("NCN"). We conduct our North American theatrical exhibition business through AMC and its subsidiaries and AMCEI. We are operating theatres outside the United States through AMCEI and its subsidiaries. We engage in advertising services through NCN.

        For financial reporting purposes we have three segments, North American theatrical exhibition, International theatrical exhibition and NCN and other.

        Our North American and International theatrical exhibition revenues are generated primarily from box office admissions and theatre concession sales. The balance of our revenues are generated from ancillary sources, including on-screen advertising, rental of theatre auditoriums, fees and other revenues generated from the sale of gift certificates and theatre tickets and arcade games located in theatre lobbies.

        Box office admissions are our largest source of revenue. We predominantly license "first-run" motion pictures from distributors owned by major film production companies and from independent distributors. We license films on a film-by-film and theatre-by-theatre basis. Film exhibition costs are accrued based on the applicable admissions revenues and estimates of the final settlement pursuant to our film licenses. Licenses that we enter into typically state that rental fees are based on either firm terms established prior to the opening of the picture or on a mutually agreed settlement upon the conclusion of the picture run. Under a firm terms formula, we pay the distributor a specified percentage of box office receipts, with the percentages declining over the term of the run. The settlement process allows for negotiation based upon how a film actually performs.

        Concessions sales are our second largest source of revenue after box office admissions. Concessions items include popcorn, soft drinks, candy, hot dogs and other products. We negotiate prices for our concessions products and supplies directly with concessions vendors on a national or regional basis to obtain high volume discounts or bulk rates and marketing incentives.

        Our revenues are dependent upon the timing of motion picture releases by distributors. The most marketable motion pictures are usually released during the summer and the year-end holiday seasons. Therefore, our business can be seasonal, with higher attendance and revenues generally occurring during the summer months and holiday seasons. Our results of operations may vary significantly from quarter to quarter.

        Fiscal year 2003 includes 53 weeks. Fiscal years 2004 and 2002 include 52 weeks.

        During fiscal 2004, films licensed from our ten largest distributors based on revenues accounted for approximately 92% of our North American admissions revenues. Our revenues attributable to individual distributors may vary significantly from year to year depending upon the commercial success of each distributor's motion pictures in any given year.

        During the period from 1990 to 2003, the annual number of first-run motion pictures released by distributors in the United States ranged from a low of 370 in 1995 to a high of 490 in 1998, according to the Motion Picture Association of America. During 2003, 459 first-run motion pictures were released by distributors in the United States.

21

        We continually upgrade the quality of our theatre circuit by adding new screens through new builds (including expansions) and acquisitions and by disposing of older screens through closures and sales. We believe our introduction of the megaplex concept in 1995 has led to the current industry replacement cycle, which has accelerated the obsolescence of older, smaller theatres by setting new standards for moviegoers. From 1995 through April 1, 2004, we added 111 theatres with 2,343 new screens, acquired 80 theatres with 786 screens and disposed of 191 theatres with 1,215 screens. As of April 1, 2004, approximately 73%, or 2,597, of our screens were located in megaplex theatres.

        We acquired Gulf States Theatres on March 15, 2002 and GC Companies, Inc. on March 29, 2002 (collectively, the "Acquisitions"), which significantly increased our size. In the Gulf States Theatres acquisition, we acquired 5 theatres with 68 screens in the New Orleans area. In the GC Companies acquisition, we acquired 66 theatres with 621 screens throughout the United States. Accordingly, results of operations for the fifty-two/fifty-three weeks ended April 1, 2004 and April 3, 2003, which include a full fifty-two/fifty-three weeks of operations of the businesses we acquired, are not comparable to our results for the fifty-two weeks ended March 28, 2002. For further information about the Acquisitions, see Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

        The accounting policies identified below are critical to our business operations and the understanding of our results of operations. The impact of, and any associated risks related to, these policies on our business operations are discussed throughout Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations where such policies affect our reported and expected financial results. For a detailed discussion on the application of these and other accounting policies, see Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II Item 8. of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The methods, estimates and judgments we use in applying our accounting policies have a significant impact on the results we report in our financial statements. Some of our accounting policies require us to make difficult and subjective judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates of matters that are inherently uncertain. Our most critical accounting estimates include the assessment of recoverability of long-lived assets, including intangibles, which impacts impairment of long-lived assets when we impair assets or accelerate their depreciation; recoverability of goodwill, which creates the potential for write-offs of goodwill; recognition and measurement of current and deferred income tax assets and liabilities, which impact our tax provision; recognition and measurement of our remaining lease obligations to landlords on our closed theatres and other vacant space, which impacts theatre and other closure expense; estimation of self-insurance reserves which impacts theatre operating and general and administrative expenses; recognition and measurement of net periodic benefit costs for our pension and other defined benefit programs, which impacts general and administrative expense; estimation of film settlement terms and measurement of film rental fees which impacts film exhibition costs and estimation of the fair value of assets acquired, liabilities assumed; and consideration paid for acquisitions which impacts the measurement of assets acquired (including goodwill) and liabilities assumed in a business combination. Below, we discuss these policies further, as well as the estimates and judgments involved.

        Impairments.    We review long-lived assets, including intangibles, for impairment as part of our annual budgeting process and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be fully recoverable. We review internal management reports on a quarterly basis as well as monitor current and potential future competition in the markets where we operate for indicators of triggering events or circumstances that indicate impairment of individual theatre assets. We evaluate theatres using historical and projected data of theatre level cash flow as our primary indicator of potential impairment and consider the seasonality of our business when evaluating theatres for impairment. Because Christmas and New Years holiday results comprise a significant portion of our operating cash flow, the actual results from this period, which are available during the fourth quarter of each fiscal year, are an integral part of our impairment analysis. As a result of these analyses, if the sum of the estimated future

22

cash flows, undiscounted and without interest charges, are less than the carrying amount of the asset, an impairment loss is recognized in the amount by which the carrying value of the asset exceeds its estimated fair value. Assets are evaluated for impairment on an individual theatre basis, which we believe is the lowest level for which there are identifiable cash flows. The impairment evaluation is based on the estimated cash flows from continuing use until the expected disposal date or the fair value of furniture, fixtures and equipment. The expected disposal date does not exceed the remaining lease period and is often less than the remaining lease period when we do not expect to operate the theatre to the end of its lease term. The fair value of assets is determined as either the expected selling price less selling costs (where appropriate) or the present value of the estimated future cash flows. The fair value of furniture, fixtures and equipment has been determined using similar asset sales and in some instances independent third party valuation studies. The discount rate used in determining the present value of the estimated future cash flows was 20% and was based on management's expected return on assets during fiscal 2004, 2003 and 2002. There is considerable management judgment necessary to determine the future cash flows, fair value and the expected operating period of a theatre, and accordingly, actual results could vary significantly from such estimates. We have recorded impairments of long-lived assets of $16.3 million, $19.6 million and $4.7 million during fiscal 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The impairment of long-lived assets recorded in fiscal 2002 is included as a component of discontinued operations.

        Goodwill.    Our recorded goodwill was $71.7 million as of April 1, 2004. We evaluate goodwill for impairment annually during the fourth fiscal quarter and any time an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value for a reporting unit below its carrying amount. We consider our North American theatrical exhibition operating segment to be the reporting unit for purposes of evaluating our recorded goodwill for impairment. If the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value we are required to reallocate the fair value of the reporting unit as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination and the fair value of the reporting unit was the price paid to acquire the reporting unit. We determine fair value by considering the market price of our common stock as well as using an enterprise valuation methodology determined by applying multiples to cash flow estimates less net indebtedness which we believe is an appropriate method to determine fair value. There is considerable management judgment with respect to cash flow estimates and appropriate multiples to be used in determining fair value and the market value of our common stock could be volatile.

        Income taxes.    In determining income for financial statement purposes, we must make certain estimates and judgments. These estimates and judgments occur in the calculation of certain tax liabilities and in the determination of the recoverability of certain of the deferred tax assets, which arise from temporary differences between the tax and financial statement recognition of revenue and expense as well as operating loss carryforwards. We must assess the likelihood that we will be able to recover our deferred tax assets in each domestic and foreign tax jurisdictions in which we operate. If recovery is not more likely than not, we must record a valuation allowance for the deferred tax assets that we estimate are more likely than not unrealizable. In 2004, we determined that full valuation allowances should have been recorded against deferred tax assets in all foreign tax jurisdictions until the related operations became profitable. Accordingly, we restated financial statements for the years ended April 3, 2003 and March 28, 2002 and the balance of retained earnings as of March 29, 2001 to reflect additional valuation allowances on foreign deferred tax assets. As of April 1, 2004, we had recorded approximately $162 million of deferred tax assets (net of valuation allowances of $26.5 million) related to the estimated future tax benefits of temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and amounts reported in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, as well as operating loss carryforwards. The recoverability of these deferred income tax assets is dependent upon our ability to generate future taxable income in the relevant taxing jurisdictions. Projections of future taxable income require considerable management judgment about future attendance levels, revenues and expenses. See "Liquidity and Capital Resources- Deferred Tax Assets" for additional information about our income taxes.

23

        Theatre and Other Closure Expense.    Theatre and other closure expense is primarily related to payments made or expected to be made to landlords to terminate leases on certain of our closed theatres, other vacant space and theatres where development has been discontinued. Theatre and other closure expense is recognized at the time the theatre closes, space becomes vacant or development is discontinued. Expected payments to landlords are based on actual or discounted contractual amounts. We estimate theatre closure expense based on contractual lease terms and our estimates of taxes and utilities. The discount rate we use to estimate theatre and other closure expense is based on estimates of our borrowing costs at the time of closing. Our discount rates range from 6.6% to 21.0%. We have recorded theatre and other closure expense of $4.1 million, $5.4 million and $2.1 million in fiscal 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Accretion expense for exit activities initiated after December 31, 2002 is included as a component of theatre and other closure expense.

        Casualty Insurance.    We are self-insured for general liability up to $400,000 per occurrence and carry a $400,000 deductible limit per occurrence for workers compensation claims. We utilize actuarial projections of our ultimate losses that we will be responsible for paying and as a result there is considerable judgment necessary to determine our casualty insurance reserves. The actuarial method that we use includes an allowance for adverse developments on known claims and an allowance for claims which have been incurred but which have not been reported. As of April 1, 2004 and April 3, 2003, we had recorded casualty insurance reserves of $20.5 million and $19.8 million, respectively. We have recorded expense related to general liability and workers compensation claims of $10.6 million, $6.8 million and $10.3 million in fiscal 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

        Pension and Postretirement Assumptions.    Pension and postretirement benefit obligations and the related effects on operations are calculated using actuarial models. Two critical assumptions, discount rate and expected return on assets, are important elements of plan expense and/or liability measurement. We evaluate these critical assumptions at least annually. Other assumptions involve demographic factors such as retirement, expected increases in compensation, mortality and turnover. These assumptions are evaluated periodically and are updated to reflect our experience. Actual results in any given year will often differ from actuarial assumptions because of economic and other factors.

        The discount rate enables us to state expected future cash flows at a present value on the measurement date. We have little latitude in selecting this rate, as it is required to represent the market rate for high-quality fixed income investments. A lower discount rate increases the present value of benefit obligations and increases pension and postretirement expense. For our principal pension plans, a 50 basis point decrease in the discount rate would increase pension expense by approximately $1 million. For our postretirement plan, a 50 basis point decrease in the discount rate would increase postretirement expense by approximately $186,000. We reduced our discount rate from 6³/4% to 6¹/4% for fiscal 2005 to reflect market interest rate conditions. We have recorded expenses for our pension and postretirement plans of $6.0 million, $3.5 million and $3.0 million in fiscal 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. We expect that our total pension and postretirement expense will increase by approximately $1.2 million from fiscal 2004 to fiscal 2005. Our unrecognized net actuarial loss for pension and postretirement plans was $19.1 million as of April 1, 2004.

        To determine the expected long-term rate of return on pension plan assets, we consider the current and expected asset allocations, as well as historical and expected returns on various categories of plan assets obtained from our investment portfolio manager. A 50 basis point decrease in the expected return on assets of our qualified defined benefit pension plan would increase pension expense on our principal plans by approximately $200,000 per year. Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II Item 8. of this Annual Report on Form 10-K includes disclosure of our pension plan and postretirement plan assumptions and information about our pension plan assets.

24

        Film Exhibition Costs.    We predominantly license "first-run" motion pictures on a film-by-film and theatre-by-theatre basis from distributors owned by major film production companies and from independent distributors. We obtain these licenses based on several factors, including number of seats and screens available for a particular picture, revenue potential and the location and condition of our theatres. We pay rental fees on a negotiated basis.

        Licenses that we enter into typically are based on either firm terms established prior to the opening of the picture or on a mutually agreed settlement upon the conclusion of the picture run. Under a firm terms formula, we pay the distributor a specified percentage of box office receipts, with the percentages declining over the term of the run. The settlement process allows for negotiation based upon how a film actually performs.

        We accrue film exhibition costs based on the applicable box office receipts and estimates of the final settlement pursuant to the film licenses entered into with our distributors. Generally, less than one third of our quarterly film exhibition cost is estimated at period-end. The length of time until these costs are known with certainty depends on the ultimate duration of the film play, but is typically "settled" within two to three months of a particular film's opening release. Upon settlement with our film distributors, film cost expense and the related film cost payable are adjusted to the final film settlement. Such adjustments have been historically insignificant. However, actual film costs and film costs payable could differ materially from those estimates. For fiscal years 2004, 2003 and 2002 there were no significant changes in our film cost estimation and settlement procedures.

        As of April 1, 2004 and April 3, 2003, we had recorded film payables of $57 million and $49 million, respectively. We have recorded film exhibition costs of $649 million, $661 million and $486 million in fiscal 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

        Acquisitions.    We account for our acquisitions of theatrical exhibition businesses using the purchase method. The purchase method requires that we estimate the fair value of the individual assets and liabilities acquired as well as various forms of consideration given including cash, common stock, senior subordinated notes and bankruptcy related claims. We have obtained independent third party valuation studies for certain of the assets and liabilities acquired to assist us in determining fair value. The estimation of the fair value of the assets and liabilities acquired including deferred tax assets and liabilities related to such amounts and consideration given involves a number of judgments and estimates that could differ materially from the actual amounts.

        We have consummated acquisitions in fiscal 2004, 2003 and 2002 as discussed in Note 2—Acquisitions to our consolidated financial statements. During fiscal 2002 we acquired the assets of Gulf States Theatres for a cash purchase price of $46 million, during fiscal 2003 we acquired GC Companies pursuant to the plan of reorganization of GC Companies which we sponsored for a purchase price of approximately $169 million including cash payments, issuance of senior subordinated notes and the issuance of shares of our common stock. During fiscal 2004 we acquired the assets of Megastar for a cash purchase price of $15 million.

Consultation with Securities & Exchange Commission

        On March 24, 2004 we filed a registration statement on Form S-4 (Commission File No. 333-113911) with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"), which was amended on May 7, 2004 and incorporates by reference our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 3, 2003 and Form 8-K filed on February 17, 2004. The SEC Staff determined to review the registration statement and our periodic reports filed with the SEC identified above. As a result of the review of the periodic reports, the SEC Staff requested that we classify our Series A Convertible Preferred Stock outside of permanent equity into a temporary equity classification. We are currently engaged in technical discussions with the Office of the Chief Accountant of the SEC regarding the appropriate classification of our outstanding Series A Convertible Preferred Stock.

25

        In July 2001, the SEC Staff issued an Announcement which was codified as EITF Topic No. D-98. During fiscal 2002, we adopted Topic No. D-98 Classification and Measurement of Redeemable Securities. Topic No. D-98 provides guidance about determining when an equity security is redeemable at the option of the holder or upon the occurrence of an event that is solely within the control of the issuer. At the time of adoption of Topic No. D-98, there was no impact to our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Currently, we believe that Topic No. D-98 will not require our outstanding Series A Convertible Preferred Stock to be classified outside of permanent stockholders' equity until such time, if ever, that (i) the holders of our Preferred Stock either (a) are entitled to elect a majority of the board of directors or (b) could convert a portion of their Preferred Stock into a sufficient number of shares of common stock to gain control of the board of directors and (ii) our optional right to redeem the Preferred Stock is unconditional. Such circumstances do not presently exist and we believe should not exist prior to 2006, if ever. This conclusion is currently under discussion with the Staff of the SEC and is subject to change.

        The possible reclassification of our Series A Convertible Preferred Stock outside of permanent stockholders' equity would not, if made, have an impact on previously reported earnings, current earnings or related earnings per share.

        The impact to the financial statements if this reclassification were made, is as follows:

See note 7 to the consolidated financial statements.

26

OPERATING RESULTS