Back to GetFilings.com




QuickLinks -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549


Form 10-Q

      (Mark One)
ý QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2003

or

o

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                               to                              

Commission file number 333-92047-03


EME HOMER CITY GENERATION L.P.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Pennsylvania
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation
or organization)
  33-0826938
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

1750 Power Plant Road
Homer City, Pennsylvania
(Address of principal executive offices)

 

15748
(Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (724) 479-9011


        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES ý NO o

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES o NO ý

        Number of shares outstanding of the registrant's Common Stock as of November 14, 2003: Not applicable.





TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
   
  Page
    PART I—Financial Information    

Item 1.

 

Financial Statements

 

1

Item 2.

 

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

13

Item 3.

 

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

 

24

Item 4.

 

Controls and Procedures

 

24

 

 

PART II—Other Information

 

 

Item 6.

 

Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

 

25

 

 

Signatures

 

26


PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


EME HOMER CITY GENERATION L.P.

STATEMENTS OF INCOME (LOSS)

(In thousands, Unaudited)

 
  Three Months Ended
September 30,

  Nine Months Ended
September 30,

 
 
  2003
  2002
  2003
  2002
 
Operating Revenues from Marketing Affiliate                          
  Capacity revenues   $ 11,265   $ 9,624   $ 21,561   $ 35,993  
  Energy revenues     138,353     109,010     379,424     249,223  
  Income (loss) from price risk management     7,114     (623 )   4,224     (1,202 )
   
 
 
 
 
    Total operating revenues     156,732     118,011     405,209     284,014  
   
 
 
 
 
Operating Expenses                          
  Fuel     50,774     43,700     139,260     104,509  
  Plant operations     14,901     15,576     65,516     70,375  
  Depreciation and amortization     16,645     15,453     47,816     46,403  
  Administrative and general     1,459     982     3,696     3,434  
   
 
 
 
 
    Total operating expenses     83,779     75,711     256,288     224,721  
   
 
 
 
 
Operating income     72,953     42,300     148,921     59,293  
   
 
 
 
 
Other Income (Expense)                          
  Interest and other income     29     533     923     1,787  
  Interest expense     (39,115 )   (42,637 )   (118,092 )   (127,790 )
   
 
 
 
 
    Total other expense     (39,086 )   (42,104 )   (117,169 )   (126,003 )
   
 
 
 
 
Income (loss) before income taxes and accounting change     33,867     196     31,752     (66,710 )
Provision (benefit) for income taxes     15,259     (92 )   14,306     (30,490 )
   
 
 
 
 
Income (Loss) Before Accounting Change     18,608     288     17,446     (36,220 )
  Cumulative effect of change in accounting, net of tax (Note 3)             (958 )    
   
 
 
 
 
Net Income (Loss)   $ 18,608   $ 288   $ 16,488   $ (36,220 )
   
 
 
 
 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

1



EME HOMER CITY GENERATION L.P.

STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

(In thousands, Unaudited)

 
  Three Months Ended
September 30,

  Nine Months Ended
September 30,

 
 
  2003
  2002
  2003
  2002
 
Net Income (Loss)   $ 18,608   $ 288   $ 16,488   $ (36,220 )

Other comprehensive income (expense), net of tax:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
  Unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives qualified as cash flow hedges:                          
    Cumulative effect of change in accounting for derivatives, net of income tax expense of $5,562 for the nine months ended September 30, 2002                 6,357  
    Other unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during period, net of income tax expense (benefit) of $5,875 and $(2,515) for the three months and $(206) and $1,098 for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively     7,164     (2,875 )   (251 )   1,255  
    Reclassification adjustments included in net income (loss), net of income tax expense (benefit) of $(1,563) and $(616) for the three months and $(11,120) and $3,308 for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively     1,906     704     13,560     (3,781 )
   
 
 
 
 
Other comprehensive income (loss)     9,070     (2,171 )   13,309     3,831  
   
 
 
 
 
Comprehensive Income (Loss)   $ 27,678   $ (1,883 ) $ 29,797   $ (32,389 )
   
 
 
 
 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

2



EME HOMER CITY GENERATION L.P.

BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, Unaudited)

 
  September 30,
2003

  December 31,
2002

Assets            
Current Assets            
  Cash and cash equivalents   $ 137,605   $ 59,174
  Fuel inventory     17,446     27,257
  Spare parts inventory     24,452     24,159
  Deposits under lease swap agreement         67,098
  Assets under price risk management     20,148    
  Other current assets     14,601     4,511
   
 
    Total current assets     214,252     182,199
   
 

Property, Plant and Equipment

 

 

2,102,726

 

 

2,069,603
  Less accumulated depreciation and amortization     148,337     99,997
   
 
    Net property, plant and equipment     1,954,389     1,969,606
   
 

Deferred taxes

 

 


 

 

18,747
Restricted cash     40,000     77,909
   
 
Total Assets   $ 2,208,641   $ 2,248,461
   
 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

3



EME HOMER CITY GENERATION L.P.

BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, Unaudited)

 
  September 30,
2003

  December 31,
2002

Liabilities and Partners' Equity            
Current Liabilities            
  Accounts payable   $ 3,351   $ 3,446
  Accrued liabilities     34,125     17,341
  Due to affiliates     38,112     18,579
  Interest payable     56,742     41,740
  Interest payable to affiliates     10,129     52,703
  Advances under lease swap agreement     18,685    
  Liabilities under price risk management     1,329     9,585
  Current portion of lease financing     29,597     59,723
   
 
    Total current liabilities     192,070     203,117
   
 

Long-term debt to affiliate

 

 

498,975

 

 

554,299
Lease financing, net of current portion     1,397,430     1,426,961
Deferred taxes     6,911    
Benefit plans and other     37,135     19,258
   
 

Total Liabilities

 

 

2,132,521

 

 

2,203,635
   
 
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 4)            

Partners' Equity

 

 

76,120

 

 

44,826
   
 
Total Liabilities and Partners' Equity   $ 2,208,641   $ 2,248,461
   
 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

4



EME HOMER CITY GENERATION L.P.

STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' EQUITY

(In thousands, Unaudited)

 
  Chestnut Ridge
Energy Company

  Mission Energy
Westside Inc.

  Total
Partners' Equity

Balance at December 31, 2002   $ 43,960   $ 866   $ 44,826
 
Net income

 

 

16,472

 

 

16

 

 

16,488
 
Non-cash contribution

 

 

1,496

 

 

1

 

 

1,497
 
Other comprehensive income

 

 

13,296

 

 

13

 

 

13,309
   
 
 
Balance at September 30, 2003   $ 75,224   $ 896   $ 76,120
   
 
 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

5



EME HOMER CITY GENERATION L.P.

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands, Unaudited)

 
  Nine Months Ended
September 30,

 
 
  2003
  2002
 
Cash Flows From Operating Activities              
  Net income (loss)   $ 16,488   $ (36,220 )
  Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:              
    Depreciation and amortization     47,816     46,403  
    Non-cash contribution of services     1,497     1,667  
    Deferred taxes     26,448     (26,242 )
    Cumulative effect of change in accounting, net of tax     958      
  Increase in due to/from affiliates     19,533     (15,022 )
  (Increase) decrease in inventory     9,518     (2,526 )
  Increase in other assets     (10,090 )   (2,311 )
  Decrease in accounts payable     (95 )   (683 )
  Increase in accrued liabilities     16,784     5,760  
  Increase (decrease) in interest payable     (27,572 )   86,920  
  Increase in other liabilities     13,734     933  
  Increase in net assets under price risk management     (15,095 )   (2,150 )
   
 
 
Net cash provided by operating activities     99,924     56,529  
   
 
 
Cash Flows From Financing Activities              
  Advances under lease swap agreement     85,783     54,141  
  Borrowings on long-term obligations from affiliates     20,966     20,585  
  Repayments of debt obligations from affiliates     (76,290 )    
  Repayments of lease financing     (59,657 )   (91,534 )
  Financing costs         (283 )
   
 
 
Net cash used in financing activities     (29,198 )   (17,091 )
   
 
 
Cash Flows From Investing Activities              
  Capital expenditures     (30,204 )   (24,092 )
  Decrease in restricted cash     37,909     52,608  
   
 
 
Net cash provided by investing activities     7,705     28,516  
   
 
 
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents     78,431     67,954  
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period     59,174     38,501  
   
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period   $ 137,605   $ 106,455  
   
 
 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

6



EME HOMER CITY GENERATION L.P.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2003

(Dollars in thousands, except as indicated; Unaudited)

Note 1.    General

        In the opinion of management, all adjustments, including recurring accruals, have been made that are necessary to present fairly the financial position and results of operations for the periods covered by this report. The results of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the full year.

        EME Homer City's significant accounting policies are described in Note 2 to its financial statements as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, included in its 2002 annual report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. EME Homer City follows the same accounting policies for interim reporting purposes. This quarterly report should be read in connection with such financial statements. Terms used but not defined in this report are defined in EME Homer City's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.

        During the first quarter of 2003, EME Homer City's marketing affiliate entered into agreements using the capacity of the Homer City facilities to participate in auction revenue rights awarded through the Pennsylvania-New Jersey-Maryland Power Pool, or PJM, to load servicing entities. The auction revenue rights are applicable to the period of June 1, 2003 through May 31, 2004, and the benefits of such agreements will flow through to EME Homer City. EME Homer City's share of auction revenue rights was $16.5 million, of which $11.5 million has been received by September 30, 2003. Payments for the remaining auction revenue rights are due ratably over the auction year. Revenue related to the auction revenue rights are recognized on a straight-line basis over the period of the agreements.

Note 2.    Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

        Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) consisted of the following:

 
  Unrealized Gains
(Losses) on Cash
Flow Hedges

  Accumulated Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)

 
Balance at December 31, 2002   $ (4,415 ) $ (4,415 )
Current period change     13,309     13,309  
   
 
 
Balance at September 30, 2003   $ 8,894   $ 8,894  
   
 
 

        Unrealized gains on cash flow hedges at September 30, 2003 primarily include forward energy sales contracts that did not meet the normal sales and purchases exception under SFAS No. 133. These gains arise because current forecasts of future electricity prices are lower than EME Homer City's contract prices. As EME Homer City's hedged positions are realized, approximately $3.0 million, after tax, of the net unrealized gains on cash flow hedges will be reclassified into earnings during the next twelve months. Management expects that when the hedged items are recognized in earnings, the net unrealized gains associated with them will be offset. Actual amounts ultimately reclassified to earnings over the next twelve months could vary materially from this estimated amount as a result of changes in market conditions. The maximum period over which a cash flow hedge is designated is through December 31, 2004.

        Under SFAS No. 133, the portion of a cash flow hedge that does not offset the change in value of the transaction being hedged, which is commonly referred to as the ineffective portion, is immediately recognized in earnings. EME Homer City recorded net gains of $7.3 million and $3.5 million during

7



the third quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2003, respectively, representing the amount of cash flow hedges' ineffectiveness, reflected in income (loss) from price risk management in the income statement.

Note 3.    Changes in Accounting

Adoption of New Accounting Pronouncements

        Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 143.    Effective January 1, 2003, EME Homer City adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations." SFAS No. 143 requires entities to record the fair value of a liability for a legal asset retirement obligation in the period in which it is incurred. When the liability is initially recorded, the entity capitalizes the cost by increasing the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset. Over time, the liability is increased to its present value each period, and the capitalized cost is depreciated over the useful life of the related asset. Upon settlement of the liability, an entity either settles the obligation for its recorded amount or incurs a gain or loss upon settlement. On January 1, 2003, EME Homer City recorded a $958 thousand, after tax, decrease to net income as the cumulative effect of adoption of SFAS No. 143.

        EME Homer City recorded a liability representing expected future costs associated with site reclamation, facilities dismantlement and removal of environmental hazards as follows:

Initial asset retirement obligation as of January 1, 2003   $ 3,862
Accretion expense     289
   
Balance of asset retirement obligation as of September 30, 2003   $ 4,151
   

        Had SFAS No. 143 been applied retroactively in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002, it would not have had a material effect upon EME Homer City's results of operations.

        Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 146.    Effective January 1, 2003, EME Homer City adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 146, "Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities." SFAS No. 146 requires that liabilities for costs associated with exit or disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002 be recognized when incurred, rather than at the date of a commitment to an exit or disposal plan. The adoption of this standard had no impact on EME Homer City's financial statements.

        Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 149.    In April 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 149, "Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities." This statement amends and clarifies financial accounting and reporting for derivative instruments and for hedging activities under SFAS No. 133. The amendment reflects decisions made by the FASB and the Derivatives Implementation Group (DIG) process in connection with issues raised about the application of SFAS No. 133. Generally, the provisions of SFAS No. 149 will be applied prospectively for contracts entered into or modified after June 30, 2003 and for hedging relationships designated after June 30, 2003. SFAS No. 149 provisions that resulted from the DIG process that became effective in fiscal quarters beginning before June 15, 2003 will continue to be applied based upon their original effective dates. The adoption of this standard had no impact on EME Homer City's financial statements.

        Statement of Financial Accounting Standards Interpretation No. 45.    In November 2002, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards Interpretation No. 45, "Guarantor's Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others." This interpretation establishes reporting requirements to be made by a guarantor about its obligations under certain guarantees that it has issued. It also clarifies that a guarantor is required to recognize, at the inception of a guarantee, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken in

8



issuing the guarantee. The initial recognition and initial measurement provisions of this interpretation are applicable on a prospective basis to guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002. The adoption of this standard had no impact on EME Homer City's financial statements. See disclosure regarding guarantees and indemnities in Note 4—Commitments and Contingencies.

Accounting Pronouncements Issued But Not Yet Adopted

        Emerging Issues Task Force No. 03-11.    In July 2003, the EITF reached a consensus on Issue No. 03-11, "Reporting Realized Gains and Losses on Derivative Instruments that are Subject to FASB Statement No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, and Not Held for Trading Purposes." EITF Issue No. 03-11 provides guidance on whether realized gains and losses on derivative contracts should be reported on a net or gross basis and concludes such classification is a matter of judgment that depends on the relevant facts and circumstances. In analyzing the facts and circumstances, EITF Issue No. 99-19, "Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal Versus Net as an Agent," should be considered. Gains and losses on non-trading derivative instruments are recognized in income (loss) from price risk management in the accompanying income statements. The consensus is effective prospectively for EME Homer City transactions or arrangements entered into or modified after September 30, 2003.

        Statement of Financial Accounting Standards Interpretation No. 46.    In January 2003, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards Interpretation No. 46, "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities." This interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, "Consolidated Financial Statements," addresses consolidation by business enterprises of variable interest entities. The primary objective of the interpretation is to provide guidance on the identification of, and financial reporting for, entities over which control is achieved through means other than voting rights; such entities are known as variable interest entities. This interpretation applies to variable interest entities created after January 31, 2003, and applies to variable interest entities in which EME Homer City holds a variable interest that it acquired before February 1, 2003. Effective October 9, 2003, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards Interpretation No. 46-6, "Effective Date of Financial Accounting Standards Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities." This interpretation delays the effective date for applying the provisions of FIN 46 to variable interest entities in which EME Homer City holds a variable interest that it acquired before February 1, 2003 until the end of the first interim or annual period ended after December 15, 2003. EME Homer City does not expect that this standard will have a material impact on its financial statements.

Note 4.    Commitments and Contingencies

Plant Improvements

        EME Homer City contracted with a division of ABB Flakt, now Alstom Power, to make environmental capital improvements to its generating units. The contractor was retained to construct a limestone-based, wet scrubber flue gas desulfurization system at Unit 3 and a selective catalytic reduction system at each of the three units. These improvements were intended to enable the Homer City generating units to comply with Phase II of Title IV of the federal Clean Air Act regarding sulfur oxide emissions, the Pennsylvania nitrogen oxide allowance regulations and Pennsylvania's response to the United States Environmental Protection Agency's State Implementation Plan Call regarding nitrogen oxide emissions. The contract consists of a fixed price, turnkey engineering, procurement and construction contract, including project management costs and other project costs. EME Homer City has spent $297 million related to this contract through September 30, 2003, which concludes the capital requirements for the project.

        The wet scrubber flue gas desulfurization system on Unit 3 has been installed and is operational. The selective catalytic reduction system on Unit 3 was installed but went out of service on February 10,

9



2002 due to a collapse of ductwork which caused the entire unit to shut down. Unit 3 was returned to service on April 4, 2002 and operated with the selective catalytic reduction system bypassed until June 19, 2003, when the selective catalytic reduction system was returned to service. EME Homer City believes that the costs to repair the damage will be covered, for the most part, by insurance and the contractual obligations of the contractor. EME Homer City recovered $15.2 million under its insurance programs during the first nine months of 2003 and has an additional $8.9 million recorded as a receivable at September 30, 2003. EME Homer City may be entitled to additional recovery of business interruption losses, but such determination has not been made or quantified at this time.

        The selective catalytic reduction systems on Units 1 and 2 have also been installed and several improvements were made during 2002 and 2003 to resolve past operating and structural issues. The contractor re-commissioned these units and the selective catalytic reduction systems for Units 1 and 2 have been operational since April 19, 2003 and May 18, 2003, respectively.

Environmental Matters

        EME Homer City is subject to environmental regulation by federal, state and local authorities in the United States. EME Homer City believes that it is in substantial compliance with environmental regulatory requirements and that maintaining compliance with current requirements will not materially affect EME Homer City's financial position or results of operations. However, possible future developments, such as the promulgation of more stringent environmental laws and regulations, and future proceedings that may be initiated by environmental authorities, could affect the costs and the manner in which EME Homer City conducts its business and could cause EME Homer City to make substantial additional capital expenditures. There is no assurance that EME Homer City would be able to recover these increased costs from its customers or that its financial position and results of operations would not be materially adversely affected.

        Typically, environmental laws require a lengthy and complex process for obtaining licenses, permits and approvals prior to construction and operation of a new project or modification of an existing project. Meeting all the necessary requirements can delay or sometimes prevent the completion of a proposed project as well as require extensive modifications to existing projects, which may involve significant capital expenditures. If EME Homer City fails to comply with applicable environmental laws, it may be subject to penalties and fines imposed against EME Homer City by regulatory authorities.

Ash Disposal Site

        The Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, or PADEP, regulations governing ash disposal sites require, among other things, groundwater assessments of landfills if existing groundwater monitoring indicates the possibility of degradation. The assessments could lead to the installation of additional monitoring wells and if degradation of the groundwater were discovered, EME Homer City would be required to develop abatement plans, which may include the lining of unlined sites. To date, the facilities' ash disposal site has not shown any signs that would require abatement. Management does not believe that the costs of maintaining and abandoning the ash disposal site will have a material impact on EME Homer City's results of operations or financial position.

Interconnection Agreement

        EME Homer City's general partner, Mission Energy Westside, has entered into an interconnection agreement with New York State Electric & Gas Corporation, or NYSEG, and Pennsylvania Electric Company, or Penelec, an affiliate of GPU, Inc., to provide interconnection services necessary to interconnect the Homer City facilities with NYSEG and Penelec's transmission systems. Unless terminated earlier in accordance with its terms, the interconnection agreement will terminate on a date mutually agreed to by Mission Energy Westside, NYSEG and Penelec. This date will not exceed the

10



retirement date of the Homer City units. NYSEG and Penelec have agreed to extend such interconnection services (but not the expiration of the agreement) to modifications, additions, upgrades or repowering of the Homer City units. Mission Energy Westside is required to compensate NYSEG and Penelec for all reasonable costs associated with any modifications, additions or replacements made to NYSEG or Penelec's interconnection facilities or transmission systems in connection with any modification, addition, upgrade or repowering to the Homer City units.

Insurance

        EME Homer City maintains insurance policies that are comparable to those carried by other electric generating facilities of similar size. The insurance program includes all-risk real and personal property insurance, including coverage for losses from boiler and machinery breakdowns, and the perils of earthquake and flood, subject to certain sublimits. The property insurance program currently covers losses up to $950 million. Under the terms of the participation agreements entered into on December 7, 2001 as part of the sale-leaseback transaction, EME Homer City is required to maintain specified minimum insurance coverages if and to the extent that such insurance is available on a commercially reasonable basis. Although the insurance covering the Homer City facilities is comparable to insurance coverages normally carried by companies engaged in similar businesses, and owning similar properties, the insurance coverages that are in place do not meet the minimum insurance coverages required under the participation agreements. Due to the current market environment, the minimum insurance coverage is not commercially available at reasonable prices. EME Homer City has obtained a waiver under the participation agreements which permits it to maintain its current insurance coverage through June 1, 2004.

        EME Homer City also carries general liability insurance covering liabilities to third parties for bodily injury or property damage resulting from operations, automobile liability insurance and excess liability insurance. Limits and deductibles in respect of these insurance policies are comparable to those carried by other electric generating facilities of similar size.

Guarantees and Indemnities

        In connection with the sale-leaseback transaction related to the Homer City facilities, EME Homer City and EME entered into tax indemnity agreements. Under these tax indemnity agreements, EME Homer City and EME agreed to indemnify the equity investors in the sale-leaseback transaction for specified adverse tax consequences that could result in certain situations set forth in the tax indemnity agreements, including specified defaults under the respective leases. The potential indemnity obligation under these tax indemnity agreements could be significant. Due to the nature of the obligations under these tax indemnity agreements, EME Homer City cannot determine a maximum potential liability. The indemnities would be triggered by a valid claim from the lessors. EME Homer City has not recorded a liability related to these indemnities.

        In connection with the acquisition of the Homer City facilities, EME Homer City agreed to indemnify the sellers with respect to environmental liabilities before and after the date of sale as specified in the Asset Purchase Agreement dated August 1, 1998. Edison Mission Energy guaranteed the obligations of EME Homer City. Due to the nature of the obligation under this indemnity provision, it is not subject to a maximum potential liability and does not have an expiration date. Payments would be triggered under this indemnity by a claim from the sellers. EME Homer City has not recorded a liability related to this indemnity.

11


Collective Bargaining Agreement

        In May 2003, EME Homer City reached agreement with the union that represents approximately 75% of its employees on a new collective bargaining agreement covering wages, benefits and working conditions. The new agreement runs from May 14, 2003 to December 31, 2006.

Note 5.    Supplemental Statements of Cash Flows Information

 
  Nine Months Ended
September 30,

 
  2003
  2002
Cash paid for interest   $ 145,374   $ 39,462
Cash paid for income taxes   $ 3,248   $ 1,959
Non-cash lease financing obligation   $   $ 688

12



ITEM 2.    MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
               AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

        The following discussion contains forward-looking statements. These statements are based on EME Homer City Generation L.P.'s (EME Homer City's) knowledge of present facts, current expectations about future events and assumptions about future developments. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of performance; they are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions that could cause actual future activities and results of operations to be materially different from those set forth in this discussion. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ include risks set forth in "—Market Risk Exposures" below, and under "—Risk Factors" in the Management's Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition included in Item 7 of EME Homer City's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.

        The Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of this Form 10-Q discusses material changes in the results of operations, financial condition and other developments of EME Homer City since December 31, 2002, and as compared to the third quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2002. This discussion presumes that the reader has read or has access to the Management's Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition included in Item 7 of EME Homer City's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.

General

        EME Homer City is a Pennsylvania limited partnership between Chestnut Ridge Energy Company, as a limited partner with a 99.9 percent interest, and Mission Energy Westside Inc., as a general partner with a 0.1 percent interest. Both Chestnut Ridge Energy and Mission Energy Westside are wholly owned subsidiaries of Edison Mission Holdings Co., a wholly owned subsidiary of Edison Mission Energy, which is referred to as EME. EME is a wholly owned subsidiary of Mission Energy Holding Company and is an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Edison International. EME Homer City was formed on October 31, 1998 for the purpose of acquiring, owning and operating three coal-fired electric generating units and related facilities, which are referred to as the "Homer City facilities," located near Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania for the purpose of producing electric energy.

        On December 7, 2001, EME Homer City completed a sale-leaseback of the Homer City facilities to third-party lessors for an aggregate purchase price of $1.591 billion, made up of $782 million in cash and assumption of debt (the fair value of which was $809.3 million). This transaction has been accounted for as a lease financing for accounting purposes.

        EME Homer City derives revenue from the sale of energy and capacity into the Pennsylvania-New Jersey-Maryland Power Pool, or PJM, and the New York Independent System Operator, or NYISO, and from bilateral contracts with power marketers and load serving entities within PJM, NYISO and the surrounding markets. EME Homer City has entered into a contract with a marketing affiliate for the sale of energy and capacity from the Homer City facilities, which enables this marketing affiliate to engage in forward sales and hedging transactions to manage electricity price exposure.

Related Party Transactions

        During the first quarter of 2003, EME Homer City's marketing affiliate entered into agreements using the capacity of the Homer City facilities to participate in auction revenue rights awarded through PJM to load servicing entities. The auction revenue rights are applicable to the period of June 1, 2003 through May 31, 2004, and the benefits of such agreements will flow through to EME Homer City. EME Homer City's share of auction revenue rights was $16.5 million, of which $11.5 million has been received by September 30, 2003. Payments for the remaining auction revenue rights are due ratably over the auction year. Revenue related to the auction revenue rights are recognized on a straight-line basis over the period of the agreements.

13



Results of Operations

 
  Three Months Ended
September 30,

  Nine Months Ended
September 30,

 
 
  2003
  2002
  2003
  2002
 
Statistics                          
  Generation (in GWhr)     4,042     3,477     10,690     8,411  
  Availability(1)     97.6 %   89.1 %   87.8 %   71.0 %
  Forced outage rate(2)     2.1 %   10.8 %   4.3 %   20.4 %
  Average realized energy price/MWh   $ 34.57   $ 31.24   $ 35.46   $ 29.68  
  Capacity revenues (in millions)   $ 11   $ 10   $ 22   $ 36  

(1)
The availability factor is determined by the number of megawatt-hours the coal plants are available to generate electricity divided by the product of the capacity of the coal plants (in megawatts) and the number of hours in the period. The coal plants are not available during periods of planned and unplanned maintenance.

(2)
The forced outage rate is generally referred to as unplanned maintenance.

Operating Revenues

        Operating revenues increased $38.7 million and $121.2 million in the third quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2003, respectively, compared to the corresponding periods of 2002. Energy and capacity sales were made through contracts with EME Homer City's marketing affiliate. The 2003 increases were due to increased generation and higher energy prices. See "—Market Risk Exposures—Commodity Price Risk" for further discussion of PJM market prices. The nine-month period increase in generation primarily resulted from an unplanned outage on Unit 3 and extended outages on Units 1 and 2 during the first two quarters of 2002. On February 10, 2002, the ductwork and bypass associated with the selective catalytic reduction system on Unit 3 collapsed causing the entire unit to shut down. Unit 3 returned to service on April 4, 2002 and operated with the selective catalytic reduction system bypassed until June 19, 2003, when it was returned to service. As a result of the Unit 3 ductwork collapse, EME Homer City reviewed the similar structures on Units 1 and 2 and determined that as a precaution it would be appropriate to install additional reinforcement in these structures. The additional reinforcement extended the duration of planned outages for these units, which had been scheduled to end on June 2, 2002. Unit 1 returned to service on June 28, 2002 and Unit 2 returned to service on June 26, 2002.

        Income from price risk management activities increased $7.7 million and $5.4 million in the third quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2003, respectively, compared to the corresponding periods of 2002. A portion of the increases was due to ineffectiveness gains that were attributable to decreases in the difference between energy prices at the PJM West Hub (where EME Homer City's marketing affiliate enters into forward contracts) and the energy prices at the delivery point where power generated by the Homer City facilities is delivered into the transmission system (referred to as the Homer City busbar). Under SFAS No. 133, the portion of a cash flow hedge that does not offset the change in value of the transaction being hedged, which is commonly referred to as the ineffective portion, is immediately recognized in earnings. In addition, EME Homer City recognized ineffectiveness gains related to forward energy sales contracts that were settled during the third quarter and nine-month periods. The settlements were recognized as a reversal of previously recorded price risk management losses and as a reduction of energy revenues. See "—Market Risk Exposures—Commodity Price Risk" for more information regarding forward market prices.

14



Operating Expenses

        Operating expenses increased $8.1 million and $31.6 million in the third quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2003, respectively, compared to the corresponding periods of 2002. Operating expenses consisted of expenses for fuel, plant operations, depreciation and amortization, and administrative and general expenses. The change in the components of operating expenses is discussed below.

        Fuel expenses increased $7.1 million and $34.8 million in the third quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2003, respectively, compared to the corresponding periods of 2002. The increases were primarily due to increased generation. The nine-month period increase in generation was primarily due to outages experienced during the first half of 2002. The average price of delivered coal per ton was $25.70 and $26.20 during the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The change in the average price of delivered coal per ton is primarily due to the changes in the type of coal being used in operations.

        Plant operations costs decreased $0.7 million and $4.9 million in the third quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2003, respectively, compared to the corresponding periods of 2002. Plant operations costs include labor and overhead, contract services, parts and supplies and other administrative costs. The nine-month period decrease is primarily due to lower maintenance costs in 2003 as compared to 2002 when EME Homer City's units experienced outages.

Other Income (Expense)

        Interest expense decreased $3.5 million and $9.7 million in the third quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2003, respectively, compared to the corresponding periods of 2002. Interest expense primarily relates to the lease financing of the Homer City facilities. Interest expense also includes interest of $10.1 million and $12.7 million in the third quarters ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, and $31.4 million and $37.3 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, from EME Homer City's subordinated revolving loan agreement with Edison Mission Finance.

Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes

        EME Homer City had effective income tax rates during the first nine months of 2003 and 2002 of 45.1% and (45.7)%, respectively. EME Homer City's effective income tax rate varies from the federal statutory rate of 35% due to state income taxes.

Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting Principle

        Effective January 1, 2003, EME Homer City adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations." SFAS No. 143 requires entities to record the fair value of a liability for a legal asset retirement obligation in the period in which it is incurred. When the liability is initially recorded, the entity capitalizes the cost by increasing the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset. Over time, the liability is increased to its present value each period, and the capitalized cost is depreciated over the useful life of the related asset. Upon settlement of the liability, an entity either settles the obligation for its recorded amount or incurs a gain or loss upon settlement. On January 1, 2003, EME Homer City recorded a $958 thousand, after tax, decrease to net income as the cumulative effect of adoption of SFAS No. 143.

15



Liquidity and Capital Resources

Historical

        At September 30, 2003, EME Homer City had cash and cash equivalents of $137.6 million compared to $59.2 million at December 31, 2002. Net working capital at September 30, 2003 was $22.2 million compared to $(20.9) million at December 31, 2002.

        Net cash provided by operating activities increased $43.4 million in the first nine months of 2003 compared to the corresponding period of 2002. The change is primarily due to income in 2003 versus losses in 2002 and the timing of cash receipts and disbursements related to working capital items. A portion of the increase is due to accelerated payments for power and advances of a portion of the subsequent month's power from EME Homer City's marketing affiliate in 2003. In 2002, EME Homer City received payment during the month following the delivery of power. The acceleration of payments from EME Homer City's marketing affiliate occurred as a result of an agreement with EME Homer City's owner participant which permits the marketing affiliate to enter into forward energy sales contracts with EME Homer City. See "—Credit Ratings." The increases in operating cash flow were partially offset by payments of interest to EME Homer City's affiliate.

        Net cash used in financing activities increased $12.1 million in the first nine months of 2003 compared to the corresponding period of 2002. In 2003, EME Homer City had a net paydown of affiliate debt, repaid a portion of its lease financing and received an advance on the lease swap agreement. In 2002, EME Homer City borrowed from its affiliate, repaid a portion of its lease financing and also received an advance on the lease swap agreement.

        Net cash provided by investing activities decreased $20.8 million in the first nine months of 2003 compared to the corresponding period of 2002. The decrease is due to a lower amount of restricted cash utilized in 2003 as compared to 2002, partially offset by a slight increase in capital expenditures.

Current

        EME Homer City plans to spend approximately $7.5 million for the remainder of 2003 on capital expenditures. The use of EME Homer City's cash generated from operations is restricted by the sale-leaseback agreements. Therefore, part of these expenditures are planned to be funded through additional loans to EME Homer City under its subordinated revolving loan agreement with Edison Mission Finance. EME Homer City believes that it will have adequate liquidity to meet its obligations as they become due in the next 12 months.

        Under the participation agreements entered into as part of the sale-leaseback transaction, EME Homer City's ability to enter into specified transactions and to engage in specified business activities, including financing and investment activities, is subject to significant restrictions. These restrictions could affect, and in some cases significantly limit or prohibit, its ability to, among other things, merge, consolidate or sell its assets, create liens on its properties or assets, enter into non-permitted trading activities, enter into transactions with its affiliates, incur indebtedness, create, incur, assume or suffer to exist guarantees or contingent obligations, make restricted payments to its partners, make capital expenditures, own subsidiaries, liquidate or dissolve, engage in non-permitted business activities, sublease its leasehold interests in the facilities or make improvements to the facilities. Accordingly, its liquidity is substantially based on its ability to generate cash flow from operations and loans from Edison Mission Finance under the subordinated revolving loan agreement. If EME Homer City is unable to generate cash flow from operations necessary, together with amounts available from Edison Mission Finance, to meet its obligations, EME Homer City will have limited ability to obtain additional capital, unless its partners provide additional funding, which they are under no legal obligation to do.

        EME Homer City's bank accounts are largely under the control of a collateral agent that operates in accordance with a security deposit agreement executed as part of the sale-leaseback transaction.

16



Accordingly, EME Homer City's access to most of the cash in its bank accounts is limited to specific uses set forth in this agreement. The rent payments that EME Homer City owes under the sale-leaseback are comprised of two components, a senior rent portion and an equity rent portion. The senior rent is used exclusively for debt service to the holders of the senior secured bonds, while the equity rent is paid to the owner-lessors. In order to pay the equity portion of the rent, EME Homer City is required to meet historical and projected senior rent service coverage ratios of 1.7 to 1.0 subject to reduction to 1.3 to 1.0 under circumstances specified in the participation agreements. During the 12 months ended September 30, 2003, the senior rent service coverage ratio was 4.53 to 1. The senior rent service coverage ratio is determined by dividing net cash flow as defined in the participation agreements by the senior rent due in that period. In addition, if EME Homer City does not meet specified debt service coverage ratios while the lease debt is outstanding, it will not pay the equity portion of the rent to the owner-lessors. Accordingly, the sale-leaseback documentation does not permit the lessor to terminate the lease in the event of non-payment of the equity portion of the rent while the lease debt is outstanding.

Distributions to Edison Mission Energy

        The following table summarizes the payments by EME Homer City under its subordinated revolving loan that constitute permitted distributions pursuant to the terms of the sale-leaseback transaction (in millions):

 
  Nine Months Ended
September 30,

 
  2003
  2002
Payment of interest   $ 74.0   $
Payment of principal     76.3    
   
 
Total payments   $ 150.3 * $
   
 

*
Includes $48.5 million from additional cash on hand due to accelerated payments received from Edison Mission Marketing & Trading, EME Homer City's marketing affiliate.

Credit Ratings

        Credit ratings related to the senior unsecured debt of EME and the corporate credit rating of Edison Mission Marketing & Trading are as follows:

 
  Moody's Rating
  S&P Rating
Edison Mission Energy   B2   B
Edison Mission Marketing & Trading   Not Rated   B

        On October 28, 2003, Standard & Poor's Ratings Service downgraded the credit rating of the pass-through bonds related to the sale-leaseback of the Homer City facilities (to BB from BBB-). Standard & Poor's also lowered the credit ratings on EME Homer City's indirect parent, EME, (senior unsecured debt to B from BB-) and on Edison Mission Marketing & Trading (corporate credit rating to B from BB-). Standard & Poor's placed the ratings of all of these entities on CreditWatch with negative implications. Moody's Investors Service has assigned a negative rating outlook for EME.

        These ratings actions did not trigger any defaults or prepayment obligations of EME Homer City. EME Homer City cannot provide assurance that the credit ratings above will remain in effect for any given period of time or that one or more of these ratings will not be lowered further. EME Homer City notes that these credit ratings are not recommendations to buy, sell or hold securities and may be revised at any time by a rating agency.

17


        Pursuant to EME Homer City's sale-leaseback documents, a below investment grade credit rating of Edison Mission Marketing & Trading restricts EME Homer City's ability to enter into permitted trading activities, as defined in the documents, with Edison Mission Marketing & Trading to sell forward the output of its facilities. These documents include a requirement that the counterparty to such transactions, and EME Homer City, if acting as seller to an unaffiliated third party, be investment grade. EME Homer City currently sells all of the output from its facilities through Edison Mission Marketing & Trading, which has a below investment grade credit rating, and EME Homer City is not rated. Therefore, in order for EME Homer City to continue to sell forward the output of its facilities, either: (1) EME Homer City must obtain consent from the sale-leaseback owner participant to permit it to sell directly into the market or through Edison Mission Marketing & Trading; or (2) Edison Mission Marketing & Trading must provide assurances of performance consistent with the requirements of the sale-leaseback documents. EME Homer City has obtained a consent from the sale-leaseback owner participant that will allow it to enter into such sales, under specified conditions, through December 31, 2004. EME Homer City continues to be in compliance with the terms of the consent, although as a result of the recent downgrade of Edison Mission Marketing & Trading's corporate credit rating to B from BB-, the consent is now revocable. The owner participant has not indicated that it intends to revoke the consent; however, there can be no assurance that it will not do so in the future. Revocation of the consent would not affect trades between Edison Mission Marketing & Trading and EME Homer City that had been entered into while the consent was still in effect. EME Homer City is permitted to sell the output of its facilities into the PJM market at any time on a spot-market basis.

Market Risk Exposures

        EME Homer City's primary market risk exposures arise from fluctuations in electricity and fuel prices, emission allowances and transmission rights. EME Homer City manages these risks in part by using derivative financial instruments in accordance with established policies and procedures. Electric power generated at the Homer City facilities is sold under bilateral arrangements with domestic utilities and power marketers pursuant to transactions with terms of two years or less, or to the PJM or NYISO. These pools have short-term markets which establish an hourly clearing price. The Homer City facilities are situated in the PJM control area and are physically connected to high-voltage transmission lines serving both the PJM and NYISO markets.

Commodity Price Risk

        EME Homer City's revenues and results of operations are dependent upon prevailing market prices for energy, capacity, emission credits and ancillary services in the PJM, NYISO and other

18



competitive markets. The following table depicts the average market prices per megawatt-hour in PJM during the first nine months of 2003 and 2002:

 
  24-Hour PJM
Historical Energy
Prices*

 
  2003
  2002
January   $ 36.56   $ 20.52
February     46.13     20.62
March     46.85     24.27
April     35.35     25.68
May     32.29     21.98
June     27.26     24.98
July     36.55     30.01
August     39.27     30.40
September     28.71     29.00
   
 
Nine-Month Average   $ 36.55   $ 25.27
   
 

*
Energy prices were calculated at the Homer City busbar (delivery point) using historical hourly prices provided on the PJM-ISO web-site.

        As shown on the above table, the average historical market prices at the Homer City busbar (delivery point) during the first nine months of 2003 were higher than the average historical market prices during the first nine months of 2002, although in September of each year the power prices were similar. Forward market prices in PJM fluctuate as a result of a number of factors, including natural gas prices, transmission congestion, changes in market rules, electricity demand which is affected by weather and economic growth, and the amount of existing and planned power plant capacity. The actual spot prices for electricity delivered into these markets may vary materially from the forward market prices.

        Sales made in the real-time or day-ahead market receive the actual spot prices at the Homer City busbar. In order to mitigate price risk from changes in spot prices at the Homer City busbar, EME Homer City's marketing affiliate may enter into forward contracts with counterparties for forecasted generation in future periods. Currently, there is not a liquid market for entering into forward contracts at the Homer City busbar. A liquid market does exist for delivery to a collection of delivery points known as PJM West Hub, which the marketing affiliate's price risk management activities use to enter into forward contracts. EME Homer City's revenues with respect to such forward contracts include:


        Under the PJM market design, locational marginal pricing (sometimes referred to as LMP) has the effect of raising prices at those delivery points affected by transmission congestion. During the past 12 months, an increase in transmission congestion at delivery points east of the Homer City facilities has resulted in prices at the PJM West Hub (which includes delivery points east of the Homer City facilities) being higher than those at the Homer City busbar. Thus, while forward prices at PJM West Hub have historically been higher than the prices at the Homer City busbar by less than 5%, increased congestion during the last 12 months at delivery points east of the Homer City facilities has resulted in prices at PJM West Hub being on average 8% higher than those at the Homer City busbar.

19


        By entering into forward contracts using the PJM West Hub as the delivery point, EME Homer City is exposed to "basis risk," which occurs when forward contracts are executed on a different basis (in this case PJM West Hub) than the actual point of delivery (Homer City busbar). In order to mitigate basis risk resulting from forward contracts using PJM West Hub as the delivery point, EME Homer City's marketing affiliate has participated in purchasing firm transmission rights in PJM, and may continue to do so in the future. A firm transmission right provides the holder with a financial instrument to receive actual spot prices at one point of delivery and pay spot prices at another point of delivery. Accordingly, the marketing affiliate's price risk management activities include using firm transmission rights alone or in combination with forward contracts to manage the risks associated with changes in prices within the PJM market.

        The following table sets forth the forward market prices for energy per megawatt-hour as quoted for sales into the PJM West Hub at September 30, 2003:

 
  24-Hour PJM West
Forward Energy Prices*

2003      
  October   $ 30.82
  November     28.82
  December     32.27

2004 Calendar "strip"(1)

 

 

32.84

(1)
Market price for energy purchases for the entire calendar year, as quoted for sales into the PJM West Hub.

*
Energy prices were determined by obtaining broker quotes and other public sources for the PJM West Hub delivery point. (Forward prices at PJM West are generally higher than the prices at the Homer City busbar.)

        Among the factors that influence future market prices for energy, capacity and ancillary services in PJM and NYISO are:

        EME Homer City's ability to make payments of lease rent on the facility leases depends on revenues generated by the facilities, which depend on their performance level and on market conditions for the sale of capacity and energy. These market conditions are beyond EME Homer City's control.

        EME Homer City's risk management policy allows for the use of derivative financial instruments through its marketing affiliate to limit financial exposure to energy prices for non-trading purposes. Use of these instruments exposes EME Homer City to commodity price risk, which includes potential losses that can arise from a change in the market value of a particular commodity. Commodity price risks are actively monitored to ensure compliance with EME Homer City's risk management policies through its

20



marketing affiliate. Policies are in place which define the risk tolerance for EME Homer City. Procedures exist which allow for monitoring of all commitments and positions with regular reviews by a risk management committee. EME Homer City's marketing affiliate performs a "value at risk" analysis in its daily business to measure, monitor and control EME Homer City's overall market risk exposure. The use of value at risk allows management to aggregate overall commodity risk, compare risk on a consistent basis and identify the drivers of the risk. Value at risk measures the possible loss over a given time interval, under normal market conditions, at a given confidence level. Given the inherent limitations of value at risk and relying on a single risk measurement tool, EME Homer City's marketing affiliate supplements this approach with the use of stress testing and worst-case scenario analysis, as well as stop loss limits and counterparty credit exposure limits. Despite this, there can be no assurance that all risks have been accurately identified, measured and/or mitigated.

        The following table summarizes the fair values for outstanding financial instruments used for price risk management activities. The substantial change in fair value of electricity contracts is attributable to the decline in average market prices to below contracted prices during September, which is the valuation date, causing the fair value of the contracts to become assets instead of liabilities.

 
  September 30,
2003

  December 31,
2002

 
 
  (in thousands)

 
Commodity price:              
  Electricity contracts   $ 18,819   $ (9,284 )
  Other         (301 )
   
 
 
  Total fair value   $ 18,819   $ (9,585 )
   
 
 

        In assessing the fair value of EME Homer City's derivative financial instruments, it uses a variety of methods and assumptions based on the market conditions and associated risks existing at each balance sheet date. The fair value of commodity price contracts takes into account quoted market prices, time value of money, volatility of the underlying commodities and other factors. The following table summarizes the maturities, the valuation method and the related fair value of EME Homer City's commodity risk management assets and liabilities as of September 30, 2003 (in thousands):

 
  Total Fair
Value

  Maturity
<1 year

  Maturity
1 to 3
years

  Maturity
4 to 5
years

  Maturity
>5 years

Prices actively quoted   $ 18,819   $ 6,901   $ 11,918   $   $
   
 
 
 
 

Credit Risk

        In conducting price risk management activities, EME Homer City's marketing affiliate enters into contracts with a number of utilities, energy companies and financial institutions. Due to factors beyond EME Homer City's control, market liquidity has decreased significantly since the beginning of 2002, and a number of formerly significant trading parties have completely withdrawn from the market or substantially reduced their trading activities. The reduction in the credit quality of traditional trading parties increases EME Homer City's credit risk. While various industry groups and regulatory agencies have taken steps to address market liquidity, transparency and credit issues, there is no assurance as to when, or how effectively, such efforts will restore market confidence. In the event a counterparty were to default on its trade obligation, EME Homer City would be exposed to the risk of possible loss associated with reselling the contracted product at a lower price if the non-performing counterparty were unable to pay the resulting liquidated damages owed to EME Homer City. Further, EME Homer City would be exposed to the risk of non-payment of accounts receivable accrued for products delivered prior to the time such counterparty defaulted.

21



        To manage credit risk, EME Homer City's marketing affiliate looks at the risk of a potential default by counterparties. Credit risk is measured by the loss that would occur if the counterparties failed to perform pursuant to the terms of their contractual obligations. EME Homer City's marketing affiliate has established controls to determine and monitor the creditworthiness of counterparties and uses master netting agreements whenever possible to mitigate the exposure to counterparty risk. This may require counterparties to pledge collateral when deemed necessary. EME Homer City's marketing affiliate generally manages the credit in its portfolio based on credit ratings using published ratings of counterparties and other publicly disclosed information, such as financial statements, regulatory filings, and press releases to guide the process of setting credit levels, risk limits and contractual arrangements including master netting agreements. The credit quality of EME Homer City's marketing affiliate's counterparties is reviewed regularly by a risk management committee. In addition to continuously monitoring EME Homer City's credit exposure to counterparties, EME Homer City's marketing affiliate also takes appropriate steps to limit or lower credit exposure. Despite this, there can be no assurance that EME Homer City's marketing affiliate will be wholly successful or that collateral pledged will be adequate.

Interest Rate Risk

        EME Homer City has mitigated the risk of interest rate fluctuations by obtaining fixed rate financing on its outstanding long-term debt with its affiliate. EME Homer City does not believe that interest rate fluctuations will have a material adverse effect on its financial position or results of operations.

Environmental Matters and Regulations

        For a discussion of EME Homer City's environmental matters, refer to "Environmental Matters and Regulations" on page 36 of EME Homer City's annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 and the notes to the Financial Statements set forth therein. There have been no other significant developments with regard to environmental matters that affect disclosures presented in the annual report, except as follows.

        A federal district court, ruling on a lawsuit filed by the United States Environmental Protection Agency, or EPA, found on August 7, 2003 that the Ohio Edison Company violated requirements of the new source review, or NSR, program within the Clean Air Act by upgrading certain coal-fired power plants without first obtaining the necessary preconstruction permits. On August 26, 2003, another federal district court, ruling in an NSR enforcement action against Duke Energy Corporation, adopted a different interpretation of the NSR provisions that could limit liability for similar upgrade projects.

        In addition, however, the EPA, on October 27, 2003, issued its final rule (effective December 26, 2003) revising its regulations to define more clearly a category of activities that are not subject to NSR requirements under the "routine maintenance, repair and replacement" exclusion. This regulation may mitigate some or all of the potential impact of the Ohio Edison decision, particularly as to future repair and replacement projects.

        Both recent judicial decisions and the newly issued regulation are currently under review by EME Homer City to assess what implications, if any, they will have on the operation of its power plant or on its results of operations or financial position.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

        For a discussion of EME Homer City's critical accounting policies and estimates, refer to "Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates" on page 22 of EME Homer City's annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002.

22



New Accounting Standards

Adoption of New Accounting Pronouncements

        Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 143.    Effective January 1, 2003, EME Homer City adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations." SFAS No. 143 requires entities to record the fair value of a liability for a legal asset retirement obligation in the period in which it is incurred. When the liability is initially recorded, the entity capitalizes the cost by increasing the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset. Over time, the liability is increased to its present value each period, and the capitalized cost is depreciated over the useful life of the related asset. Upon settlement of the liability, an entity either settles the obligation for its recorded amount or incurs a gain or loss upon settlement. On January 1, 2003, EME Homer City recorded a $958 thousand, after tax, decrease to net income as the cumulative effect of adoption of SFAS No. 143.

        Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 146.    Effective January 1, 2003, EME Homer City adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 146, "Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities." SFAS No. 146 requires that liabilities for costs associated with exit or disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002 be recognized when incurred, rather than at the date of a commitment to an exit or disposal plan. The adoption of this standard had no impact on EME Homer City's financial statements.

        Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 149.    In April 2003, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 149, "Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities." This statement amends and clarifies financial accounting and reporting for derivative instruments and for hedging activities under SFAS No. 133. The amendment reflects decisions made by the FASB and the Derivatives Implementation Group (DIG) process in connection with issues raised about the application of SFAS No. 133. Generally, the provisions of SFAS No. 149 will be applied prospectively for contracts entered into or modified after June 30, 2003 and for hedging relationships designated after June 30, 2003. SFAS No. 149 provisions that resulted from the DIG process that became effective in fiscal quarters beginning before June 15, 2003 will continue to be applied based upon their original effective dates. The adoption of this standard had no impact on EME Homer City's financial statements.

        Statement of Financial Accounting Standards Interpretation No. 45.    In November 2002, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards Interpretation No. 45, "Guarantor's Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others." This interpretation establishes reporting requirements to be made by a guarantor about its obligations under certain guarantees that it has issued. It also clarifies that a guarantor is required to recognize, at the inception of a guarantee, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee. The initial recognition and initial measurement provisions of this interpretation are applicable on a prospective basis to guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002. The adoption of this standard had no impact on EME Homer City's financial statements. See disclosure regarding guarantees and indemnities in Note 4—Commitments and Contingencies.

Accounting Pronouncements Issued But Not Yet Adopted

        Emerging Issues Task Force No. 03-11.    In July 2003, the EITF reached a consensus on Issue No. 03-11, "Reporting Realized Gains and Losses on Derivative Instruments that are Subject to FASB Statement No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, and Not Held for Trading Purposes." EITF Issue No. 03-11 provides guidance on whether realized gains and losses on derivative contracts should be reported on a net or gross basis and concludes such classification is a matter of judgment that depends on the relevant facts and circumstances. In analyzing the facts and

23


circumstances, EITF Issue No. 99-19, "Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal Versus Net as an Agent," should be considered. Gains and losses on non-trading derivative instruments are recognized in income (loss) from price risk management in the accompanying income statements. The consensus is effective prospectively for EME Homer City transactions or arrangements entered into or modified after September 30, 2003.

        Statement of Financial Accounting Standards Interpretation No. 46.    In January 2003, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards Interpretation No. 46, "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities." This interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, "Consolidated Financial Statements," addresses consolidation by business enterprises of variable interest entities. The primary objective of the interpretation is to provide guidance on the identification of, and financial reporting for, entities over which control is achieved through means other than voting rights; such entities are known as variable interest entities. This interpretation applies to variable interest entities created after January 31, 2003, and applies to variable interest entities in which EME Homer City holds a variable interest that it acquired before February 1, 2003. Effective October 9, 2003, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards Interpretation No. 46-6, "Effective Date of Financial Accounting Standards Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities." This interpretation delays the effective date for applying the provisions of FIN 46 to variable interest entities in which EME Homer City holds a variable interest that it acquired before February 1, 2003 until the end of the first interim or annual period ended after December 15, 2003. EME Homer City does not expect that this standard will have a material impact on its financial statements.


ITEM 3.    QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

        For a discussion of market risk sensitive instruments, refer to "Market Risk Exposures" on page 29 of EME Homer City's annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002. Refer to "Market Risk Exposures" in Item 2 for an update to that disclosure.


ITEM 4.    CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

        EME Homer City's management, with the participation of the partnership's principal executive officer and principal financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of EME Homer City's disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act")) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, EME Homer City's disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

        There have not been any changes in EME Homer City's internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, EME Homer City's internal control over financial reporting.

24




PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 6.    EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

(a)   Exhibits

Exhibit No.

  Description
31.1   Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

31.2

 

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

32

 

Statement Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.

(b)   Reports on Form 8-K

        No reports on Form 8-K were filed during the quarter ended September 30, 2003.

25




SIGNATURES

         Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

    EME HOMER CITY GENERATION L.P.
(REGISTRANT)

 

 

By:

 

Mission Energy Westside Inc., as
General Partner

 

 

By:

 

/s/ Kevin M. Smith

Kevin M. Smith
Director, Vice President and Treasurer

 

 

Date:

 

November 14, 2003

26




QuickLinks

TABLE OF CONTENTS
EME HOMER CITY GENERATION L.P. STATEMENTS OF INCOME (LOSS) (In thousands, Unaudited)
EME HOMER CITY GENERATION L.P. STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) (In thousands, Unaudited)
EME HOMER CITY GENERATION L.P. BALANCE SHEETS (In thousands, Unaudited)
EME HOMER CITY GENERATION L.P. BALANCE SHEETS (In thousands, Unaudited)
EME HOMER CITY GENERATION L.P. STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' EQUITY (In thousands, Unaudited)
EME HOMER CITY GENERATION L.P. STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (In thousands, Unaudited)
EME HOMER CITY GENERATION L.P. NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SEPTEMBER 30, 2003 (Dollars in thousands, except as indicated; Unaudited)
SIGNATURES