ISTAR FINANCIAL INC - 10-Q Quarterly Report

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (i) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports); and (ii) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12-b-2). Yes ý No o

As of August 8, 2003, there were 100,492,916 shares of common stock of iStar Financial Inc. $0.001/par value per share outstanding ("Common Stock").

		Page
PART I.	Consolidated Financial Information	2
Item 1.	Financial Statements:
	Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002	2
	Consolidated Statements of Operations—For the three and six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002	3
	Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders' Equity—For the six months ended June 30, 2003	4
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows—For the three and six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002	5
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	6
Item 2.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	40
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	57
PART II.	Other Information	58
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	58
Item 2.	Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds	58
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	58
Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	58
Item 5.	Other Information	59
Item 6.	Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K	59
SIGNATURES	60

iStar Financial Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In thousands, except per share data)

(unaudited)

iStar Financial Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(In thousands, except per share data)

(unaudited)

iStar Financial Inc.
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders' Equity
(In thousands)
(unaudited)

iStar Financial Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In thousands)

(unaudited)

Business—iStar Financial Inc. (the "Company") is the leading publicly-traded finance company focused on the commercial real estate industry. The Company provides custom-tailored financing to high-end private and corporate owners of real estate nationwide, including senior and junior mortgage debt, senior, mezzanine and subordinated corporate capital, and corporate net lease financing. The Company, which is taxed as a real estate investment trust ("REIT"), seeks to deliver strong dividends and superior risk-adjusted returns on equity to shareholders by providing innovative and value-added financing solutions to its customers.

The Company's investment strategy targets specific sectors of the real estate credit markets in which it believes it can deliver value-added, flexible financial solutions to its customers, thereby differentiating its financial products from those offered by other capital providers.

Organization—The Company began its business in 1993 through private investment funds formed to capitalize on inefficiencies in the real estate finance market. In March 1998, these funds contributed their approximately $1.1 billion of assets to the Company's predecessor in exchange for a controlling interest in that company. Since that time, the Company has grown by originating new lending and leasing transactions, as well as through corporate acquisitions.

Specifically, in September 1998, the Company acquired the loan origination and servicing business of a major insurance company, and in December 1998, the Company acquired the mortgage and mezzanine loan portfolio of its largest private competitor. Additionally, in November 1999, the Company acquired TriNet Corporate Realty Trust, Inc. ("TriNet" or the "Leasing Subsidiary"), then the largest publicly-traded company specializing in corporate sale/leaseback transactions for office and industrial facilities (the "TriNet Acquisition"). The TriNet Acquisition was structured as a stock-for-stock merger of TriNet with a subsidiary of the Company.

Concurrent with the TriNet Acquisition, the Company also acquired its former external advisor in exchange for shares of the Company's common stock ("Common Stock") and converted its organizational form to a Maryland corporation. As part of the conversion to a Maryland corporation, the Company replaced its former dual class common share structure with a single class of Common Stock. The Company's Common Stock began trading on the New York Stock Exchange on November 4, 1999. Prior to this date, the Company's common shares were traded on the American Stock Exchange.

The accompanying unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in conformity with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10, Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X for interim financial statements. Accordingly, they do not include all the information and footnotes required by generally

accepted accounting principles in the United States of America ("GAAP") for complete financial statements. The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Company, its qualified REIT subsidiaries, and its majority-owned and controlled partnerships.

Certain other investments in partnerships or joint ventures which the Company does not control are also accounted for under the equity method (see Note 6). All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

In the opinion of management, the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements contain all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair statement of the Company's consolidated financial position at June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002 and the results of its operations, changes in shareholders' equity and its cash flows for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Such operating results are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any other interim periods or the entire year.

Loans and other lending investments, net—As described in Note 4, "Loans and Other Lending Investments" includes the following investments: senior mortgages, subordinate mortgages, corporate/partnership loans, other lending investments-loans and other lending investments-securities. Management considers nearly all of its loan and other lending investments to be held-to-maturity, although a small number of investments may be classified as available-for-sale. Items classified as held-to-maturity are reflected at amortized historical cost. Items classified as available-for-sale are reported at fair values with unrealized gains and losses included in "Accumulated other comprehensive income (losses)" on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets, and are not included in the Company's net income.

Corporate tenant lease assets and depreciation—Corporate tenant lease assets are generally recorded at cost less accumulated depreciation. Certain improvements and replacements are capitalized when they extend the useful life, increase capacity or improve the efficiency of the asset. Repairs and maintenance items are expensed as incurred. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method of cost recovery over estimated useful lives of 40.0 years for facilities, five years for furniture and equipment, the shorter of the remaining lease term or expected life for tenant improvements and the remaining life of the facility for facility improvements.

Corporate tenant lease assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of their carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell. The Company also periodically reviews long-lived assets to be held and used for an impairment in value whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. In management's opinion, corporate tenant lease assets to be held and used are not carried at amounts in excess of their estimated recoverable amounts.

Capitalized interest—The Company capitalizes interest costs incurred during the construction period on qualified build-to-suit projects for corporate tenants, including investments in joint ventures accounted for under the equity method. No interest was capitalized during the three months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, and approximately $0 and $70,000 was capitalized during the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

Cash and cash equivalents—Cash and cash equivalents include cash held in banks or invested in money market funds with original maturity terms of less than 90 days.

Restricted cash—Restricted cash represents amounts required to be maintained in escrow under certain of the Company's debt obligations and leasing transactions.

Revenue recognition—The Company's revenue recognition policies are as follows:

Loans and other lending investments: Management considers nearly all of its loans and other lending investments to be held-to-maturity, although a small number of investments may be classified as available-for-sale. The Company reflects held-to-maturity investments at amortized cost less allowance for loan losses, acquisition premiums or discounts, deferred loan fees and undisbursed loan funds. Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale investments are included in "Accumulated other comprehensive income (losses)" on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets and are not included in the Company's net income. On occasion, the Company may acquire loans at small premiums or discounts based on the credit characteristics of such loans. These premiums or discounts are recognized as yield adjustments over the lives of the related loans. If loans that were acquired at a premium or discount are prepaid, the Company immediately recognizes the unamortized premium or discount as a decrease or increase, respectively, in the prepayment gain or loss. Loan origination or exit fees, as well as direct loan origination costs, are also deferred and recognized over the lives of the related loans as a yield adjustment. Interest income is recognized using the effective interest method applied on a loan-by-loan basis.

A small number of the Company's loans provide for accrual of interest at specified rates which differ from current payment terms. Interest is recognized on such loans at the accrual rate subject to management's determination that accrued interest and outstanding principal are ultimately collectible, based on the underlying collateral and operations of the borrower.

Prepayment penalties or yield maintenance payments from borrowers are recognized as additional income when received. Certain of the Company's loan investments provide for additional interest based on the borrower's operating cash flow or appreciation of the underlying collateral. Such amounts are considered contingent interest and are reflected as income only upon certainty of collection.

Leasing investments: Operating lease revenue is recognized on the straight-line method of accounting from the later of the date of the origination of the lease or the date of acquisition of the facility subject to existing leases. Accordingly, contractual lease payment increases are recognized evenly over the term of the lease. The cumulative difference between lease revenue recognized under this method and contractual lease payment terms is recorded as "Deferred operating lease income receivable" on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Provision for loan losses—The Company's accounting policies require that an allowance for estimated loan losses be maintained at a level that management, based upon an evaluation of known and inherent risks in the portfolio, considers adequate to provide for loan losses. In establishing loan loss provisions, management periodically evaluates and analyzes the Company's assets, historical and industry loss experience, economic conditions and trends, collateral values and quality, and other relevant factors. Specific valuation allowances are established for impaired loans in the amount by which the carrying value, before allowance for estimated losses, exceeds the fair value of collateral less disposition costs on an individual loan basis. Management considers a loan to be impaired when, based upon current information and events, it believes that it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement on a timely basis. Management measures these impaired loans at the fair value of the loans' underlying collateral less estimated disposition costs. Impaired loans may be left on accrual status during the period the Company is pursuing repayment of the

loan; however, these loans are placed on non-accrual status at such time as: (1) management believes that the potential risk exists that scheduled debt service payments will not be met within the coming 12 months; (2) the loans become 90 days delinquent; (3) management determines the borrower is incapable of, or has ceased efforts toward, curing the cause of the impairment; or (4) the net realizable value of the loan's underlying collateral approximates the Company's carrying value of such loan. While on non-accrual status, interest income is recognized only upon actual receipt. Impairment losses are recognized as direct write-downs of the related loan with a corresponding charge to the provision for loan losses. Charge-offs occur when loans, or a portion thereof, are considered uncollectible and of such little value that further pursuit of collection is not warranted. Management also provides a loan portfolio reserve based upon its periodic evaluation and analysis of the portfolio, historical and industry loss experience, economic conditions and trends, collateral values and quality, and other relevant factors.

The Company's loans are generally secured by real estate assets or are corporate lending arrangements to entities with significant rental real estate operations (i.e., an unsecured loan to a company which operates residential apartments or retail, industrial or office facilities as rental real estate). While the underlying real estate assets for the corporate lending instruments may not serve as collateral for the Company's investments in all cases, the Company evaluates the underlying real estate assets when estimating loan loss exposure because the Company's loans generally have preclusions as to how much senior and/or secured debt the customer may borrow ahead of the Company's position.

Accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activity—In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133 ("SFAS No. 133"), "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities" as amended by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 137 "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activity—Deferral of the Effective date of FASB 133", Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 138 "Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities—an Amendment of FASB Statement 133" and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 149 "Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instrument and Hedging Activities," the Company recognizes all derivatives as either assets or liabilities in the statement of financial position and measures those instruments at fair value. If certain conditions are met, a derivative may be specifically designated as: (1) a hedge of the exposure to changes in the fair value of a recognized asset or liability or an unrecognized firm commitment; (2) a hedge of the exposure to variable cash flows of a forecasted transaction; or (3) in certain circumstances, a hedge of a foreign currency exposure.

Income taxes—The Company is subject to federal income taxation at corporate rates on its "REIT taxable income"; however, the Company is allowed a deduction for the amount of dividends paid to its shareholders, thereby subjecting the distributed net income of the Company to taxation at the shareholder level only. In addition, the Company is allowed several other deductions in computing its "REIT taxable income," including non-cash items such as depreciation expense. These deductions allow the Company to shelter a portion of its operating cash flow from its dividend payout requirement under federal tax laws. The Company intends to operate in a manner consistent with and to elect to be treated as a REIT for tax purposes. iStar Operating Inc. ("iStar Operating"), the Company's REIT taxable subsidiary, is not consolidated for federal income tax purposes and is taxed as a corporation. For financial reporting purposes, current and deferred taxes are provided for in the portion of earnings recognized by the Company with respect to its interest in iStar Operating. Accordingly, except for the Company's taxable subsidiary, no current or deferred taxes are provided for in the Consolidated Financial Statements. See Note 6 for a detailed discussion on the ownership structure and operations of iStar Operating.

Earnings per common share—In accordance with the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128 ("SFAS No. 128"), the Company presents both basic and diluted earnings per share ("EPS"). Basic earnings per share ("Basic EPS") excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net income allocable to common shareholders by the weighted average number of shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share ("Diluted EPS") reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock, where such exercise or conversion would result in a lower earnings per share amount.

Reclassifications—Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified in the Consolidated Financial Statements and the related notes to conform to the 2003 presentation.

Use of estimates—The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

New accounting standards—In May 2003, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 150 ("SFAS No. 150"), "Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments With Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity." This standard requires issuers to classify as liabilities the following three types of freestanding financial instruments: (1) mandatorily redeemable financial instruments, (2) obligations to repurchase the issuer's equity shares by transferring assets; and (3) certain obligations to issue a variable number of shares. The Company will adopt the provisions of this statement, as required, on July 1, 2003, and it is not expected to have a significant financial impact on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.

In January 2003, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 46 ("FIN 46"), "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities," an interpretation of ARB 51. FIN 46 provides guidance on identifying entities for which control is achieved through means other than through voting rights (a "variable interest entity" or "VIE"), and how to determine when and which business enterprise should consolidate a VIE. In addition, FIN 46 requires that both the primary beneficiary and all other enterprises with a significant variable interest in a VIE make additional disclosures. The transitional disclosure requirements took effect immediately and were required for all financial statements initially issued or modified after January 31, 2003. Immediate consolidation is required for VIEs entered into or modified after February 1, 2003 in which the Company is deemed the primary beneficiary. For VIEs in which the Company entered into prior to February 1, 2003, consolidation will be required by the Company effective with the Company's third quarter 2003 reporting. The adoption of the additional consolidation provisions of FIN 46 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's financial statements.

In December 2002, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 148 ("SFAS No. 148"), "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation—Transition and Disclosure," an amendment of FASB Statement No. 123 ("SFAS No. 123"). This statement provides alternative transition methods for a voluntary change to the fair value basis of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. However, this Statement does not permit the use of the original SFAS No. 123 prospective method of transition for changes to the fair value based method made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2003. In addition, this Statement amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123 to require prominent disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements about the method of accounting for stock-

based employee compensation, description of transition method utilized and the effect of the method used on reported results. The Company adopted SFAS No. 148 with retroactive application to grants made subsequent to January 1, 2002 with no material effect on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.

SFAS No. 148 disclosure requirements, including the effect on net income and earnings per share if the fair value based method had been applied to all outstanding and unvested stock awards for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, are presented below (in thousands except per share amounts):

In November 2002, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 45 ("FIN 45"), "Guarantor's Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others," an interpretation of FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 5 ("SFAS No. 5"), "Accounting for Contingencies," Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 57, "Related Party Disclosures," Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 107, "Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments" and rescinds FASB Interpretation No. 34, "Disclosure of Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others, an Interpretation of SFAS No. 5." It requires that upon issuance of a guarantee, the guarantor must recognize a liability for the fair value of the obligation it assumes under that guarantee

regardless if the Company receives separately identifiable consideration (i.e., a premium). The disclosure requirements became effective December 31, 2002. The adoption of FIN 45 did not have a material impact on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements, nor is it expected to have a material impact in the future.

In September 2002, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 147 ("SFAS No. 147"), "Acquisitions of Certain Financial Institutions," an amendment of FASB Statements No. 72 and 144 and FASB Interpretation No. 9. SFAS No. 147 provides guidance on the accounting for the acquisitions of financial institutions, except those acquisitions between two or more mutual enterprises. SFAS No. 147 removes acquisitions of financial institutions from the scope of both FASB No. 72, "Accounting for Certain Acquisitions of Banking or Thrift Institutions," and FASB Interpretation No. 9, Applying APB Opinions No. 16 and 17, "When a Savings and Loan Association or a Similar Institution is Acquired in a Business Combination Accounted for by the Purchase Method," and requires that those transactions be accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 141 and SFAS No. 142. SFAS No. 147 also amends SFAS No. 144 to include in its scope long-term, customer-relationship intangible assets of financial institutions such as depositor-relationship and borrower-relationship intangible assets and credit cardholder intangible assets. The Company adopted the provisions of this statement, as required, on October 1, 2002, and it did not have a significant financial impact on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.

In June 2002, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 146 ("SFAS No. 146"), "Accounting for Exit or Disposal Activities," to address significant issues regarding the recognition, measurement, and reporting of costs that are associated with exit and disposal activities, including restructuring activities that are currently accounted for pursuant to the guidance that the Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") has set forth in EITF Issue No. 94-3, "Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring)." The scope of SFAS No. 146 also includes: (1) costs related to terminating a contract that is not a capital lease; and (2) termination benefits received by employees involuntarily terminated under the terms of a one-time benefit arrangement that is not an on-going benefit arrangement or an individual deferred-compensation contract. The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS 146 on December 31, 2002, as required, and it did not have a material effect on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.

In April 2002, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 145 ("SFAS No. 145"), "Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections." SFAS No. 145 rescinds both FASB Statements No. 4 ("SFAS No. 4"), "Reporting Gains and Losses from Extinguishment of Debt," and the amendment to SFAS No. 4, FASB Statement No. 64 ("SFAS No. 64"), "Extinguishments of Debt Made to Satisfy Sinking-Fund Requirements." Through this rescission, SFAS No. 145 eliminates the requirement (in both SFAS No. 4 and SFAS No. 64) that gains and losses from the extinguishment of debt be aggregated and, if material, classified as an extraordinary item, net of the related income tax effect. An entity is not prohibited from classifying such gains and losses as extraordinary items, so long as they meet the criteria in paragraph 20 of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 30 ("APB 30"), "Reporting the Results of Operations—Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions"; however, due to the nature of the Company's operations, such treatment may not be available to the Company. Any gains or losses on extinguishments of debt that were previously classified as extraordinary items in prior periods presented that do not meet the criteria in APB 30 for classification as an extraordinary item will be reclassified to income from continuing operations. The

provisions of SFAS No. 145 are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after May 15, 2002. The Company adopted the provisions of this statement, as required, on January 1, 2003. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, the Company reclassified $12.2 million from "Extraordinary loss from early extinguishment of debt" into "Loss on early extinguishment of debt" in continuing operations on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations.

In October 2001, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144 ("SFAS No. 144"), "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets." SFAS No. 144 provides guidance on the recognition of impairment losses on long-lived assets to be held and used or to be disposed of, and also broadens the definition of what constitutes a discontinued operation and how the results of a discontinued operation are to be measured and presented. SFAS No. 144 requires that current operations prior to the disposition of corporate tenant lease assets and prior period results of such operations be presented in discontinued operations in the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations. The provisions of SFAS No. 144 are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001, and must be applied at the beginning of a fiscal year. The Company adopted the provisions of this statement on January 1, 2002, as required, and it did not have a significant financial impact on the Company.

In July 2001, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141 ("SFAS No. 141"), "Business Combinations" and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142 ("SFAS No. 142"), "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets." SFAS No. 141 requires the purchase method of accounting to be used for all business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001. SFAS No. 141 also addresses the initial recognition and measurement of goodwill and other intangible assets acquired in business combinations and requires intangible assets to be recognized apart from goodwill if certain tests are met. SFAS No. 142 requires that goodwill not be amortized but instead be measured for impairment at least annually, or when events indicate that there may be an impairment. The Company adopted the provisions of both statements for transactions initiated after June 30, 2001, as required, and the adoption did not have a significant impact on the Company.

In July 2001, the SEC released Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 102 ("SAB 102"), "Selected Loan Loss Allowance and Documentation Issues." SAB 102 summarizes certain of the SEC's views on the development, documentation and application of a systematic methodology for determining allowances for loan and lease losses. Adoption of SAB 102 by the Company did not have a significant impact on the Company.

In September 2000, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 140 ("SFAS No. 140"), "Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities." This statement is applicable for transfers of assets and extinguishments of liabilities occurring after June 30, 2001. The Company adopted the provisions of this statement as required for all transactions entered into on or after April 1, 2001. The adoption of SFAS No. 140 did not have a significant impact on the Company.

The following is a summary description of the Company's loans and other lending investments (in thousands)(1):

During the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, the Company and its affiliated ventures originated or acquired an aggregate of approximately $752.7 million and $850.8 million in loans and other lending investments, funded $21.1 million and $15.5 million under existing loan commitments, and received principal repayments of $437.4 million and $275.8 million.

As of June 30, 2003, the Company had 14 loans with unfunded commitments. The total unfunded commitment amount was approximately $186.5 million, of which $71.0 million was discretionary and $115.5 million was non-discretionary.

The Company's loans and other lending investments are predominantly pledged as collateral under either the iStar Asset Receivables secured notes, the secured revolving credit facilities or secured term loans (see Note 7).

The Company has reflected provisions for loan losses of approximately $1.8 million and $2.0 million in its results of operations during the three months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, and $3.5 million and $3.8 million during the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. These provisions represent loan portfolio reserves based on management's evaluation of general market conditions, the Company's internal risk management policies and credit risk ratings system, industry loss experience, the likelihood of delinquencies or defaults, and the credit quality of the underlying collateral. No direct impairment reserves on specific loans were considered necessary.

During the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, the Company acquired an aggregate of approximately $60.6 million and $248.9 million in corporate tenant lease assets and disposed of corporate tenant lease assets for net proceeds of approximately $4.0 million and $3.7 million.

The Company's investments in corporate tenant lease assets, at cost, were as follows (in thousands):

		June 30, 2003			December 31, 2002
Facilities and improvements		$	2,008,947		$	1,959,309
Land and land improvements			442,414			428,365
Direct financing lease			35,751			32,640
Less: accumulated depreciation			(154,613	)		(128,509	)

	Corporate tenant lease assets, net	$	2,332,499		$	2,291,805

Under certain leases, the Company is entitled to receive additional participating lease payments to the extent gross revenues of the corporate tenant exceed a base amount. The Company did not earn any such additional participating lease payments on these leases in the three or six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002. In addition, the Company also receives reimbursements from customers for certain facility operating expenses including common area costs, insurance and real estate taxes. Customer expense reimbursements for the three months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 were approximately $8.7 million and $7.7 million, respectively, and $16.8 and $14.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, and are included as a reduction of "Operating costs—corporate tenant lease assets" on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations.

The Company is subject to expansion option agreements with two existing customers which could require the Company to fund and to construct up to 161,000 square feet of additional adjacent space on

which the Company would receive additional operating lease income under the terms of the option agreements. In addition, upon exercise of such expansion option agreements, the corporate tenants would be required to simultaneously extend their existing lease terms for additional periods ranging from six to ten years.

On January 7, 2003, the Company sold one corporate tenant lease asset for net proceeds of $4.0 million, and realized a gain of approximately $264,000. As of June 30, 2003, there was one corporate tenant lease asset with a book value of $24.8 million classified as "Assets held for sale" on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets. The results of operations from corporate tenant lease assets sold or held for sale in the current and prior periods are classified as "(Loss) income from discontinued operations" on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations even though such income or loss was actually recognized by the Company prior to the asset sale. Gains on sale from corporate tenant lease assets are classified as "Gain from discontinued operations" on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations.

On September 30, 2002, one of the Company's customers exercised an option to terminate its lease on 50.00% of the land leased from the Company. In connection with this termination, the Company realized $17.5 million in cash lease termination payments, offset by a $17.4 million impairment charge in connection with the termination, resulting in a net gain of approximately $123,000. In the fourth quarter of 2002, the customer completed a recapitalization transaction that significantly enhanced its credit. In connection with this recapitalization, the Company agreed to amend the customer's lease, effective October 1, 2002. In the lease amendment, the Company received $12.5 million in cash as prepaid lease payments and the customer agreed to fixed minimum increases on future lease payments. In exchange, the Company agreed to reduce the customer's lease obligations for a period not to exceed nine quarters. Following the reduction period, the customer is required to make additional lease payments over a 10-year period sufficient to reimburse the Company for a portion of the temporary reduction in lease payments.

On May 30, 2002, the Company sold one corporate tenant lease asset for net proceeds of $3.7 million, and realized a gain of approximately $595,000. As of December 31, 2002, there were two corporate tenant lease assets with a combined book value of $28.5 million classified as "Assets held for sale" on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Income or loss generated from the Company's joint venture investments and unconsolidated subsidiaries is included in "Equity in (loss) earnings from joint ventures and unconsolidated subsidiaries" on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations.

The Company's ownership percentages, its investments in and advances to unconsolidated joint ventures and subsidiaries, the Company's pro rata share of its ventures' third-party, non-recourse debt as

of June 30, 2003 and its respective income (loss) for the three months ended June 30, 2003 are presented below (in thousands):

Investments in and advances to unconsolidated joint ventures: At June 30, 2003, the Company had investments in three joint ventures: (1) TriNet Sunnyvale Partners L.P. ("Sunnyvale"), whose external partners are John D. O'Donnell, Trustee, John W. Hopkins, and Donald S. Grant, Trustee; (2) Corporate Technology Centre Associates, LLC ("CTC I"), whose external member is Corporate Technology Centre Partners, LLC; and (3) ACRE Simon, LLC ("ACRE"), whose external partner is William E. Simon & Sons Realty Investments, LLC. These ventures were formed for the purpose of operating, acquiring and, in certain cases, developing corporate tenant lease facilities.

At June 30, 2003, the ventures comprised 12 net leased facilities. The Company's combined investment in these joint ventures at June 30, 2003 was $30.7 million. The joint ventures' carrying value for the 12 facilities owned at June 30, 2003 was $194.4 million. In aggregate, the joint ventures had total assets of $234.6 million and total liabilities of $184.6 million as of June 30, 2003, and net income of $2.1 million and $4.0 million and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, respectively. The Company accounts for these investments under the equity method because the Company's joint venture partners have certain participating rights giving them shared control over the ventures.

On July 2, 2002, the Company paid approximately $27.9 million in cash to the former member of TriNet Milpitas Associates ("Milpitas") joint venture in exchange for its 50.00% ownership interest. Pursuant to the terms of the joint venture agreement, the former external member had the right to convert its interest into 984,476 shares of Common Stock of the Company at any time during the period February 1, 2002 through January 31, 2003. On May 2, 2002, the former Milpitas external member exercised this right. Upon the external member's exercise of its conversion right, the Company had the option to acquire the partner's interest for cash, instead of shares, for a payment equal to the value of 984,476 shares of Common Stock multiplied by the ten-day average closing stock price as of the transaction date. The Company made such election and, as of July 2, 2002, owns 100.00% of Milpitas, and therefore

consolidates these assets for accounting purposes. The Company accounted for the acquisition of the external interest using the purchase method.

On April 1, 2002, the former Sierra Land Ventures ("Sierra") joint venture partner assigned its 50.00% ownership interest in Sierra to a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. There was no cash or shares exchanged in this transaction. As of April 1, 2002, the Company owns 100.00% of the corporate tenant lease asset previously held by Sierra and therefore consolidates this asset for accounting purposes.

Effective September 29, 2000, iStar Sunnyvale Partners, LP, which is wholly owned by Sunnyvale, entered into an interest rate cap agreement limiting the venture's exposure to interest rate movements on its $24.0 million LIBOR-based mortgage loan to an interest rate of 9.00% through November 9, 2003. Currently, the limited partners of Sunnyvale have the option to convert their partnership interest into cash; however, the Company may elect to deliver 297,728 shares of Common Stock in lieu of cash.

Investments in and advances to unconsolidated subsidiaries: The Company has an investment in iStar Operating, a taxable subsidiary that, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, services the Company's loans and certain loan portfolios owned by third parties. The Company owns all of the non-voting preferred stock and a 95.00% economic interest in iStar Operating. An affiliate of the Company's largest shareholder is the owner of all the voting common stock and a 5.00% economic interest in iStar Operating. As of June 30, 2003, there have never been any distributions to the common shareholder, nor does the Company expect to make any in the future. At any time, the Company has the right to acquire all of the common stock of iStar Operating at fair market value, which the Company believes to be nominal. In addition to the direct general and administrative costs of iStar Operating, the Company allocates a portion of its general overhead expenses to iStar Operating based on the number of employees at iStar Operating as a percentage of the Company's total employees.

iStar Operating has elected to be treated as taxable REIT subsidiary for purposes of maintaining compliance with the REIT provisions of the Code and is accounted for under the equity method for financial statement reporting purposes and is presented in "Investments in and advances to joint ventures and unconsolidated subsidiaries" on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company will consolidate this entity as a VIE (see Note 3) effective July 1, 2003 with no material impact. As of June 30, 2003, iStar Operating had no debt obligations.

In addition, the Company had an investment in TriNet Management Operating Company, Inc. ("TMOC"), an entity originally formed to make a $2.0 million investment in the convertible debt securities of a real estate company which trades on the Mexican Stock Exchange. This investment was made by TriNet prior to its acquisition by the Company in 1999. Prior to March 29, 2003, the Company owned 95.00% of the outstanding voting and non-voting common stock (representing 1.00% voting power and 95.00% of the economic interest) in TMOC. The owners of the remaining TMOC stock were two executives of the Company. On March 29, 2003, the Company purchased the remaining 5.00% interest from the executives for approximately $2,000, an amount that was equal to the carrying value, which was less than their original investment. Following this purchase, the Company owned 100.00% of TMOC and therefore consolidated the entity for accounting purposes. On June 30, 2003, the $2.0 million investment was fully repaid.

As of June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, the Company has debt obligations under various arrangements with financial institutions as follows (in thousands):

Availability of amounts under the secured revolving credit facilities are based on percentage borrowing base calculations. In addition, certain of the Company's debt obligations contain covenants. These covenants are both financial and non-financial in nature. Significant financial covenants include limitations on the Company's ability to incur indebtedness beyond specified levels, restrictions on the Company's ability to incur liens on assets and limitations on the amount and type of restricted payments, such as repurchases of its own equity securities, that the Company makes. Significant non-financial covenants include a requirement in its publicly-held debt securities that the Company offer to repurchase those securities at a premium if the Company undergoes a change of control. As of June 30, 2003, the Company believes it is in compliance with all financial and non-financial covenants on its debt obligations.

On May 21, 2003, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company issued iStar Asset Receivables ("STARs"), Series 2003-1, the Company's proprietary match funding program, consisting of $645.8 million of investment-grade bonds secured by the subsidiary's structured finance and corporate tenant lease assets, which had an aggregate outstanding carrying value of approximately $739.1 million at inception. Principal payments received on the assets will be utilized to repay the most senior class of the bonds then outstanding. The maturity of the bonds match funds the maturity of the underlying assets financed under the program. The weighted average interest rate on the bonds, on an all-floating rate basis, was approximately LIBOR + 0.47% at inception. For accounting purposes, this transaction was treated as a secured financing: the underlying assets and STARs liabilities remained on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets, and no gain on sale was recognized.

On May 14, 2003, the Company extended the maturity on its $300.0 million unsecured facility to July 2004.

On April 9, 2003, the Company repaid the existing term loan financing a $75.0 million term preferred investment in a publicly-traded real estate company and simultaneously entered into another $50.0 million term loan with a leading financial institution. The new term loan bears interest at LIBOR + 0.60% and has a final maturity date of October 2003 with amortization payments in July 2003 and October 2003.

On April 8, 2003, the Company issued an additional $35.0 million of 7.00% Senior Notes due March 2008, bringing the aggregate principal amount of the Senior Notes to $185.0 million. The add-on Notes have identical terms to the Senior Notes issued in March 2003, although they were issued at 102.75% of their principal amount, to yield 6.34% per annum.

On March 14, 2003, the Company remarketed the 6.75% Dealer Remarketable Securities of its Leasing Subsidiary by acquiring and retiring those securities and by issuing $150.0 million of 7.00% Senior Notes due March 2008. The covenants in the Senior Notes due 2008 are substantially identical to the covenants contained in the Company's 8.75% Notes.

On January 27, 2003, the Company extended the maturity on one of its $700.0 million secured facilities to January 2007, which includes a one-year "term-out" at the Company's option.

On December 11, 2002, the Company closed a $61.5 million term loan financing with a leading financial institution. The proceeds were used to fund a portion of an $82.1 million CTL investment. The non-recourse loan is fixed rate and bears interest at 6.412%, has a maturity date of December 2012 and amortizes over a 30-year schedule.

On September 30, 2002, the Company closed a $500.0 million secured revolving credit facility with a leading financial institution. The facility has a three-year term and bears interest at LIBOR + 1.50% to 2.25%, depending upon the collateral contributed to the borrowing base. The facility accepts a broad range of structured finance and corporate tenant assets and has a final maturity date of September 2005.

On July 2, 2002, the Company purchased the remaining interest in the Milpitas joint venture from the former Milpitas external member for $27.9 million. Upon purchase of the interest, the Milpitas joint venture became fully consolidated for accounting purposes and approximately $79.1 million of secured term debt is reflected on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets.

On May 28, 2002, the Company fully repaid the remaining $446.2 million of bonds outstanding under STARs, Series 2000-1. Simultaneously, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company issued STARs, Series 2002-1, consisting of $885.1 million of investment-grade bonds secured by the subsidiary's structured finance and corporate tenant lease assets, which had an aggregate outstanding carrying value of approximately $1.1 billion at inception. Principal payments received on the assets will be utilized to repay the most senior class of the bonds then outstanding. The maturity of the bonds match funds the maturity of the underlying assets financed under the program. The weighted average interest rate on the bonds, on an all-floating rate basis, was approximately LIBOR + 0.56% at inception. For accounting purposes, this transaction was treated as a secured financing: the underlying assets and STARs liabilities remained on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets, and no gain on sale was recognized.

On March 29, 2002, the Company extended the maturity of its $500.0 million secured facility to August 2005, which includes a one-year "term-out" extension at the Company's option.

On August 9, 2001, the Company issued $350.0 million of 8.75% senior notes due in 2008. The notes are unsecured senior obligations of the Company. The Company used the net proceeds to repay outstanding borrowings under its secured credit facilities.

On July 27, 2001, the Company completed a $300.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility with a group of leading financial institutions. The facility has an initial maturity of July 2003, with a one-year extension at the Company's option and another one-year extension at the lenders' option. The facility replaces two prior credit facilities maturing in 2002 and 2003, and bears interest at LIBOR + 2.125%.

On July 6, 2001, the Company financed a $75.0 million structured finance asset with a $50.0 million term loan bearing interest at LIBOR + 2.50%. The loan has a maturity of July 2006, including a one-year extension at the Company's option. This investment is a $75.0 million term preferred investment in a publicly-traded real estate company. The Company's investment carries an initial current yield of 10.50%, with annual increases of 0.50% in each of the next two years. In addition, the Company's investment is convertible into the customer's common stock at a strike price of $25.00 per share. The investment is callable by the customer between months 13 and 30 of the term at a yield maintenance premium, and after month 30, at a premium sufficient to generate a 14.62% internal rate of return on the Company's investment. The investment is putable by the Company to the customer for cash after five years.

On June 14, 2001, the Company closed $193.0 million of term loan financing secured by 15 corporate tenant lease assets. The variable-rate loan bears interest at LIBOR + 1.85% (not to exceed 10.00% in aggregate) and has two one-year extensions at the Company's option. The Company used these proceeds to repay a $77.8 million secured term loan maturing in June 2001 and to pay down a portion of its revolving credit facilities. In addition, the Company extended the maturity of its $500.0 million secured revolving credit facility to August 2003. On March 29, 2002, the Company again extended the final maturity of this facility to August 2005, which includes a one-year "term-out" extension at the Company's option.

On May 15, 2001, the Company repaid its $100.0 million 7.30% unsecured notes. These notes were senior unsecured obligations of the Leasing Subsidiary and ranked equally with the Leasing Subsidiary's other senior unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness.

On February 22, 2001, the Company extended the maturity of its $350.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility to May 2002. On July 27, 2001, the Company repaid this facility and replaced it with a $300.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility.

On January 11, 2001, the Company closed a $700.0 million secured revolving credit facility which is led by a major commercial bank. The facility has a three-year primary term and one-year "term-out" extension option, and bears interest at LIBOR + 1.40% to 2.15%, depending upon the collateral contributed to the borrowing base. The facility accepts a broad range of structured finance assets and has a final maturity of January 2005. On January 27, 2003, the Company extended the final maturity on this facility to January 2007.

As of June 30, 2003, future expected/scheduled maturities of outstanding long-term debt obligations are as follows (in thousands)(1):

2003 (remaining six months)	$	66,687
2004		156,994
2005		876,817
2006		243,000
2007		570,138
Thereafter		1,961,974

Total principal maturities		3,875,610
Net unamortized debt discounts		(41,957	)
Impact of pay-floating swap agreement		9,203

Total debt obligations	$	3,842,856

The Company's charter provides for the issuance of up to 200.0 million shares of Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share, and 30.0 million shares of preferred stock. The Company has 4.4 million shares of 9.50% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, 2.3 million shares of 9.375% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, 1.5 million shares of 9.20% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, and 4.6 million shares of 8.00% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock outstanding. The Series A, B, C and D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock are redeemable without premium at the option of the Company at their respective liquidation preferences beginning on December 15, 2003, June 15, 2001, August 15, 2001 and October 8, 2002, respectively.

On December 15, 1998, the Company issued warrants to acquire 6.1 million shares of Common Stock, as adjusted for dilution, at $34.35 per share. The warrants are exercisable on or after December 15, 1999 at a price of $34.35 per share and expire on December 15, 2005.

Concentration of Shareholder Ownership—On October 30, 2001, SOFI IV SMT Holdings, L.P. ("SOFI IV") and certain of its affiliates sold 18.975 million shares of Common Stock owned by them (including the subsequently-exercised 2.475 million share over-allotment option granted to the underwriters). In addition, on May 15, 2002, SOFI IV sold 10.808 million shares of Common Stock owned by them (including the subsequently-exercised 808,200 share over-allotment option granted to the underwriters). Further, on November 14, 2002, SOFI IV sold 3.5 million shares of Common Stock owned by them (including the subsequently-exercised 1.5 million over-allotment option granted to the underwriters). Lastly, on May 13,

2003, SOFI IV distributed approximately 15.9 million shares to its limited and general partners. Some of the partners then elected to sell 6.9 million of the shares distributed to them. As a result of the secondary offerings and the distribution, SOFI IV currently owns approximately 4.05% of the Company's Common Stock (based on the diluted sharecount as of June 30, 2003). The Company did not sell any shares in the offerings, other than the November 2002 offering, in which the Company sold 8.0 million primary shares and received net proceeds of approximately $202.9 million.

DRIP/Stock Purchase Plan—The Company maintains a dividend reinvestment and direct stock purchase plan. Under the dividend reinvestment component of the plan, the Company's shareholders may purchase additional shares of Common Stock without payment of brokerage commissions or service charges by automatically reinvesting all or a portion of their Common Stock cash dividends. Under the direct stock purchase component of the plan, the Company's shareholders and new investors may purchase shares of Common Stock directly from the Company without payment of brokerage commissions or service charges. All purchases of shares in excess of $10,000 per month pursuant to the direct purchase component are at the Company's sole discretion. Shares issued under the plan may reflect a discount of up to 3.00% from the prevailing market price of the Company's Common Stock. The Company is authorized to issue up to 8.0 million shares of Common Stock pursuant to the dividend reinvestment and direct stock purchase plan. During the three months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, the Company issued a total of approximately 750,000 and 459,000 shares of its Common Stock, respectively, and during the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, the Company issued a total of approximately 1.4 million and 1.2 million shares of its Common Stock, respectively, through the direct stock purchase component of the plan. Net proceeds during the three months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 were approximately $25.6 million and $13.0 million, respectively, and $42.9 million and $33.4 million during the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. There are 4.8 million shares available under the plan as of June 30, 2003.

Stock Repurchase Program—The Board of Directors approved, and the Company has implemented, a stock repurchase program under which the Company is authorized to repurchase up to 5.0 million shares of its Common Stock from time to time, primarily using proceeds from the disposition of assets or loan repayments and excess cash flow from operations, but also using borrowings under its credit facilities if the Company determines that it is advantageous to do so. As of November 2000, the Company had repurchased a total of approximately 2.3 million shares at an aggregate cost of approximately $40.7 million. The Company has not repurchased any shares under the stock repurchase program since November 2000.

Risk management—In the normal course of its on-going business operations, the Company encounters economic risk. There are three main components of economic risk: interest rate risk, credit risk and market risk. The Company is subject to interest rate risk to the degree that its interest-bearing liabilities mature or reprice at different speeds, or different bases, than its interest-earning assets. Credit risk is the risk of default on the Company's lending investments that results from a property's, borrower's or corporate tenant's inability or unwillingness to make contractually required payments. Market risk reflects changes in the value of loans due to changes in interest rates or other market factors, including the rate of prepayments of principal and the value of the collateral underlying loans and the valuation of corporate tenant lease facilities held by the Company.

Use of derivative financial instruments—The Company's use of derivative financial instruments is primarily limited to the utilization of interest rate agreements or other instruments to manage interest rate risk exposure. The principal objective of such arrangements is to minimize the risks and/or costs associated with the Company's operating and financial structure as well as to hedge specific anticipated transactions.

The counterparties to these contractual arrangements are major financial institutions with which the Company and its affiliates may also have other financial relationships. The Company is potentially exposed to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by these counterparties. However, because of their high credit ratings, the Company does not anticipate that any of the counterparties will fail to meet their obligations. The Company does not use derivative instruments to hedge credit/market risk or for speculative purposes.

The Company has entered into the following cash flow hedges that are outstanding as of June 30, 2003. The net value (liability) associated with these hedges is reflected on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets (in thousands).

Between January 1, 2002 and June 30, 2003, the Company had two cash flow hedges each with a notional amount of $125.0 million and a strike price of 7.058% and 7.055% that expired in June 2003.

During the six months ended June 30, 2003, the Company entered into two $125.0 million forward starting swaps. These pay-fixed swaps were effective in June 2003 and replaced the two $125.0 million pay-fixed swaps mentioned above. The two new pay-fixed swaps have a three-year term and expire on June 25, 2006. In addition, in connection with a portion of the Company's fixed-rate corporate bonds, the Company entered into two pay-floating interest rate swaps struck at 3.8775% and 3.81% and in the notional amounts of $100.0 million and $50.0 million, respectively. The Company pays one-month LIBOR and receives the stated fixed rate in return. These swaps mitigate the risk of changes in the fair value of $150.0 million of the Company's fixed-rate corporate bonds attributable to changes in LIBOR. For accounting purposes, the difference between the fixed rate received and the LIBOR rate paid on the notional amount of the swap is recorded as "Interest expense" on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations. In addition, the Company adjusts the value of the swap to its fair value and adjusts the carrying amount of the hedged liability by an offsetting amount on a quarterly basis.

In connection with STARs, Series 2003-1 in May 2003, the Company entered into a LIBOR interest rate cap struck at 6.95% in the notional amount of $270.6 million, and simultaneously sold a LIBOR interest rate cap with the same terms. Since these instruments do not change the Company's net interest rate risk exposure, they do not qualify as hedges and changes in their respective values are charged to earnings. As the terms of these arrangements are substantially the same, the effects of a revaluation of these two instruments substantially offset one another.

option-based products such as caps should be expensed into earnings based on the allocation of the premium to the affected periods as if the agreement were a series of "caplets." These allocated premiums are then reflected as a charge to income (as part of interest expense) in the affected period. On May 28, 2002, in connection with the STARs, Series 2002-1 transaction, the Company paid a premium of $13.7 million for this interest rate cap. Using the "caplet" methodology discussed above, amortization of the cap premium is dependent upon the actual value of the caplets at inception.

During the year ended December 31, 1999, the Company refinanced its $125.0 million term loan maturing March 15, 1999 with a $155.4 million term loan maturing March 5, 2009. The term loan bears interest at 7.44% per annum, payable monthly, and amortizes over an approximately 22-year schedule. The term loan represented forecasted transactions for which the Company had previously entered into U.S. Treasury-based hedging transactions. The net $3.4 million cost of the settlement of such hedges has been deferred and is being amortized as an increase to the effective financing cost of the term loan over its effective ten-year term.

Credit risk concentrations—Concentrations of credit risks arise when a number of borrowers or customers related to the Company's investments are engaged in similar business activities, or activities in the same geographic region, or have similar economic features that would cause their ability to meet contractual obligations, including those to the Company, to be similarly affected by changes in economic conditions. The Company regularly monitors various segments of its portfolio to assess potential concentrations of credit risks. Management believes the current credit risk portfolio is reasonably well diversified and does not contain any unusual concentration of credit risks.

All of the Company's corporate tenant lease assets (including those held by joint ventures) and loans and other lending investments are collateralized by facilities located in the United States, with significant concentrations (i.e., greater than 10.00%) as of June 30, 2003 in California (21.10%) and New York (11.94%). As of June 30, 2003, the Company's investments also contain greater than 10.00% concentrations in the following asset types: office-CTL (26.46%), office-lending (20.14%), industrial (14.81%) and hotel-lending (10.65%).

The Company underwrites the credit of prospective borrowers and customers and often requires them to provide some form of credit support such as corporate guarantees, letters of credit and/or cash security deposits. Although the Company's loans and other lending investments and corporate customer lease assets are geographically diverse and the borrowers and customers operate in a variety of industries, to the extent the Company has a significant concentration of interest or operating lease revenues from any single borrower or customer, the inability of that borrower or customer to make its payment could have an adverse effect on the Company.

The Company's 1996 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the "Plan") is designed to provide incentive compensation for officers, other key employees and directors of the Company. The Plan provides for awards of stock options and shares of restricted stock and other performance awards. The maximum number of shares of Common Stock available for awards under the Plan is 9.00% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock, calculated on a fully diluted basis, from time to time; provided that the number of shares of Common Stock reserved for grants of options designated as incentive stock options is 5.0 million, subject to certain antidilution provisions in the Plan. All awards under the Plan, other than automatic awards to non-employee directors, are at the discretion of the Board or a committee of the Board. At June 30, 2003, a total of approximately 9.3 million shares of Common Stock were available for awards under the Plan, of which options to purchase approximately 3.5 million shares of Common Stock were

outstanding and approximately 435,000 shares of restricted stock were outstanding. A total of 1.3 million shares remain available for awards under the Plan as of June 30, 2003.

In March 1998, the Company issued approximately 2.5 million (as adjusted) fully vested and immediately exercisable options to purchase shares of Common Stock at $14.72 per share (as adjusted) to its former advisor with a term of ten years. The former advisor granted a portion of these options to its employees and the remainder was allocated to an affiliate. Upon the Company's acquisition of its former advisor, these individuals became employees of the Company. In general, the grants to these employees provided for scheduled vesting over a predefined service period of three to five years and, under certain conditions, provide for accelerated vesting. These options expire on March 15, 2008.

Changes in options outstanding during the three months ended June 30, 2003 are as follows:

The following table summarizes information concerning outstanding and exercisable options as of June 30, 2003:

	OPTIONS OUTSTANDING	OPTIONS EXERCISABLE
Exercise Price Range	Options Outstanding	Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life	Weighted Average Exercise Price		Currently Exercisable		Weighted Average Exercise Price
$14.72–$15.00(1)	819,945	5.29	$	14.72		804,445		$	14.72
$16.69–$16.88	511,423	6.51	$	16.88		511,423		$	16.88
$17.38–$17.56	293,802	6.71	$	17.38		293,802		$	17.38
$19.63–$19.69	1,414,505	7.59	$	19.69		858,349		$	19.69
$20.00–$21.44	60,266	7.11	$	20.89		6,784		$	20.63
$22.44	6,666	7.26	$	22.44		—		$	0.00
$23.32–$23.64	39,199	0.87	$	23.52		39,199		$	23.52
$24.13–$24.94	183,366	4.44	$	24.54		183,033		$	24.54
$25.10–$26.09	13,800	2.92	$	26.09		13,800		$	26.09
$26.30–$26.97	77,900	1.11	$	26.80		77,234		$	26.80
$27.00	25,000	7.99	$	27.00		16,667		$	27.00
$28.54–$29.82	90,188	8.46	$	29.68		90,188		$	29.68
$30.33	4,600	4.91	$	30.33		4,600		$	30.33
$55.39	5,094	5.92	$	55.39		5,094		$	55.39

	3,545,754	6.44	$	18.81		2,904,618		$	18.59

In the third quarter 2002 (with retroactive application to the beginning of the calendar year), the Company adopted the fair value method for accounting for options issued to employees or directors, as allowed under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 ("SFAS No. 123"), "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation." Accordingly, the Company recognizes a charge equal to the fair value of these options at the date of grant multiplied by the number of options issued. This charge will be amortized over the related remaining vesting terms to individual employees as additional compensation. There were 15,500 options issued during the six months ended June 30, 2003 with a strike price of $14.72.

Prior to the third quarter 2002, the Company had elected to use the intrinsic method for accounting for options issued to employees or directors, as allowed under SFAS No. 123 and, accordingly, recognized no expense in connection with these options to the extent that the options' exercise prices equaled or exceeded the quoted prices of the Company's shares of Common Stock on the grant or investment dates. However, in connection with the acquisition of the Company's former external advisor, the Company recognized a deferred stock-based compensation charge of approximately $5.1 million. This deferred charge represents the difference between the Company's closing stock price on the date it acquired its former external advisor (which was $20.25), and the strike price of $14.72 per share (as adjusted) for the unvested portion of the options granted to the former external advisor's employees, who are now employees of the Company. This deferred charge is being amortized over the related remaining vesting terms to the individual employees as an additional expense under "General and administrative—stock-based compensation" on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations.

If the Company's compensation costs had been determined using the fair value method of accounting for stock options issued under the Plan to employees and directors prescribed by SFAS No. 123 prior to 2002, the Company's net income for the three months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, would have been reduced on a pro forma basis by approximately $24,000 and $47,000, respectively and $48,000 and $94,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. This would not have significantly impacted the Company's earnings per share.

The fair value of each significant option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes model. Future charges may be taken to the extent of additional option grants, which are at the discretion of the Board of Directors.

During the six months ended June 30, 2003, the Company granted 38,550 restricted shares to employees that vest proportionately over three years on the anniversary date of the initial grant of which 37,450 remain outstanding.

During the year ended December 31, 2002, the Company granted 199,350 restricted shares to employees. Of these shares, 44,350 will vest proportionately over three years on the anniversary date of the initial grant. Of the 44,350 shares granted, 24,232 remain outstanding as of June 30, 2003. The balance of 155,000 restricted shares granted to several employees will vest on March 31, 2004 if: (1) the employee remains employed until that date; and (2) the 60-day average closing price of the Company's Common Stock equals or exceeds a set floor price as of such date. Dividends will be paid on the restricted shares as dividends are paid on shares of the Company's Common Stock. Assuming the shares become fully vested on March 31, 2004 and the market price of the stock is $36.50 (which was the market price of the Common Stock on June 30, 2003), the Company would incur a one-time charge to both net income and earnings at that time equal to $5.7 million (the fair market value of the 155,000 shares at $36.50 per share). During the year ended December 31, 2002, the Company also granted 208,980 restricted shares to its Chief Financial Officer (see detailed information below).

During the year ended December 31, 2001, the Company granted 94,943 restricted shares to employees in lieu of cash bonuses for the year ended December 31, 2000 at the employees' election. These restricted shares were immediately vested on the date of grant and were not transferable for a period of one year following vesting.

During the year ended December 31, 2000, the Company granted 140,402 restricted shares to employees. Of this total, 71,752 restricted shares were granted in lieu of cash bonuses at the employees' election, were immediately vested on the date of grant, and were not transferable for a period of one year following vesting. An additional 68,650 of such restricted shares vest over periods ranging from one to three years following the date of grant and are transferable upon vesting.

For accounting purposes, the Company measures compensation costs for these shares, not including the contingently issuable shares, as of the date of the grant and expenses such amounts against earnings, either at the grant date (if no vesting period exists) or ratably over the respective vesting period. Such amounts appear on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations under "General and administrative—stock-based compensation expense."

During the year ended December 31, 2002, the Company entered into a three-year employment agreement with its new Chief Financial Officer. Under the agreement, the Chief Financial Officer receives an annual base salary of $225,000. She may also receive a bonus, which is targeted to be $325,000, subject to an annual review for upward or downward adjustment. In addition, the Company granted the Chief Financial Officer 108,980 contingently vested restricted stock awards. These awards become vested on December 31, 2005 if the executive's employment with the Company has not terminated before such date. Dividends will be paid on the restricted shares as dividends are paid on shares of the Company's Common Stock. For accounting purposes, the Company will take a total charge of approximately $3.0 million related to the restricted stock awards, which will be amortized over the period from November 6, 2002 through December 31, 2005. This charge is reflected on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations under "General and administrative—stock-based compensation."

Further, the Company granted the Chief Financial Officer 100,000 restricted shares which vest in whole or in part if the Company's shareholders realize total rates of shareholder return (dividends since November 6, 2002 plus share price appreciation since January 2, 2003), achieved by the Company as of January 31, 2004. Vested shares would be subject to forfeiture if the executive's employment with the Company terminated under certain circumstances. Assuming the shares became fully vested on January 31, 2004 and the market price of the stock is $36.50 (which was the market price of the Common Stock on June 30, 2003), the Company would incur a one-time charge to both net income and earnings at that time equal to $3.7 million (the fair market value of the 100,000 shares at $36.50 per share). For accounting purposes, the employment arrangement described above is treated as a contingent, variable plan until January 31, 2004.

During the year ended December 31, 2001, the Company entered into a three-year employment agreement with its Chief Executive Officer. Under the agreement, the Chief Executive Officer receives an annual base salary of $1.0 million. He may also receive a bonus, which is targeted to be an amount equal to his base salary, if the Company achieves certain performance targets set by the Compensation Committee. The bonus award may be increased or reduced from the target depending upon the degree to which the performance goals are exceeded or are not met, and may not exceed 200.00% of his base salary. The bonus is reduced by the amount of any dividends paid to the Chief Executive Officer in respect of phantom shares (described below) which are awarded to him and have contingently vested. The Chief Executive Officer received approximately $2.1 million in such dividends in 2002. As such, no additional bonus was paid. As part of this agreement, the Company confirmed a prior grant of 750,000 stock options made to the

executive on March 2, 2001 with an exercise price of $19.69, which represented the market price at the date of the original contingent grant. However, because the grant required further approval by the Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors, no measurement date occurred for accounting purposes until such approvals were made, at which point the market price of the Company's Common Stock was $24.90. Accordingly, an aggregate charge of approximately $3.9 million is being recognized with respect to these options over the term of this agreement and is reflected on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations under "General and administrative—stock-based compensation." These options will vest in three equal installments of 250,000 shares in each January beginning in January 2002.

The Company also granted the executive 2.0 million unvested phantom shares, each of which represents one share of the Company's Common Stock. These shares will vest in installments of 350,000 shares, 650,000 shares, 600,000 shares and 400,000 shares on a contingent basis if the average closing price of the Company's Common Stock for a 60 calendar day period achieves thresholds of $25.00, $30.00, $34.00 and $37.00, respectively. As of June 30, 2003, the $25.00 and $30.00 thresholds have been attained, and a total of 1.0 million of these shares have contingently vested. Subsequent to June 30, 2003, the $34.00 threshold was met and an additional 600,000 shares contingently vested. Assuming that the market price of the Common Stock on March 31, 2004 is $36.50 (which was the market price of the Common Stock on June 30, 2003), the Company would incur a one-time charge to both net income and earnings in March 2004 of $58.4 million (the fair market value of the 1,600,000 shares at $36.50 per share). Shares that have contingently vested generally will not become fully vested until March 2004, except upon certain termination or change of control events. Further, if the average stock price drops below certain specified levels for a 60-day period prior to such date, such phantom shares would not fully vest and would be forfeited. If the Company is not authorized to issue shares to the executive upon full vesting of the phantom shares, then the vesting will be settled through a cash payment based upon the market price of the Common Stock during a recent trading period. The executive will receive dividends on shares that have contingently or fully vested and have not been forfeited under the terms of the agreement, if and when the Company declares and pays dividends on its Common Stock. Because no shares have been issued, dividends received on these phantom shares, if any, will be reflected as compensation expense by the Company. For accounting purposes, this arrangement will be treated as a contingent, variable plan and no additional compensation expense will be recognized until the shares, in whole or in part, become irrevocably vested, whereupon the Company will reflect a charge equal to the then fair value of the shares irrevocably vested.

In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2001, the Company entered into a three-year employment agreement with its former President. Under the agreement, in lieu of salary and bonus, the Company granted the executive 500,000 restricted shares. These shares became fully-vested on September 30, 2002 as a result of the Company achieving a 60.00% total shareholder rate of return (dividends plus share price appreciation) since January 1, 2001. Upon the restricted shares becoming fully vested, the Company withheld 250,000 of such shares from the executive to cover the tax obligations associated with the vesting of such shares. These shares are reflected as "Treasury stock" on the Company's Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders' Equity. For accounting purposes, the employment arrangement described above was treated as a contingent, variable plan until the April 29, 2002 contingent vesting date. The Company incurred a total non-cash charge of approximately $15.0 million related to the vesting of the shares, recognized ratably over the period from April 29, 2002 through September 30, 2002.

The executive received dividends on the share grant from the date of the agreement as and when the Company declared and paid dividends on its Common Stock. For financial statement purposes, such

dividends were accounted for in a manner consistent with the Company's normal Common Stock dividends, as a reduction to retained earnings.

Certain affiliates of SOFI IV and the Company's Chief Executive Officer have agreed to reimburse the Company for the value of restricted shares awarded to the former President in excess of 350,000 shares, net of tax benefits realized by the Company or its shareholders on account of compensation expense deductions. The reimbursement obligation arose once the restricted share award became fully vested on September 30, 2002. The Company's Chief Executive Officer fulfilled his reimbursement obligation through the delivery of shares of the Company's Common Stock owned by him. In the case of the SOFI IV affiliates, the reimbursement payment must be made through the delivery of approximately $2.4 million in cash or 131,250 shares of Common Stock. As of June 30, 2003, the SOFI IV affiliates have paid approximately $506,000 in cash. The approximately $1.9 million remaining balance of the SOFI IV affiliates' reimbursement obligation is due on or before March 31, 2004. These reimbursement payments are reflected as "Additional paid-in capital" on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets, and not as an offset to the non-cash charge referenced above.

In May 2002, the Company's shareholders approved the iStar Financial High Performance Unit ("HPU") Program. The program, as more fully described in the Company's annual proxy statement dated April 8, 2002, is a performance-based employee compensation plan that only has material value to the participants if the Company provides superior returns to its shareholders. The program entitles the employee participants ("HPU holders") to receive cash distributions in the nature of common stock dividends if the total rate of return on the Company's Common Stock (share price appreciation plus dividends) exceeds certain performance levels.

Initially, there were three plans within the program: the 2002 plan, the 2003 plan, and the 2004 plan. Each plan has 5,000 shares of High Performance Common Stock associated with it. Each share of High Performance Common Stock carries 0.25 votes per share.

For these three plans, the Company's performance is measured over a one-, two-, or three-year valuation period, beginning on January 1, 2002 and ending on December 31, 2002, December 31, 2003 and December 31, 2004, respectively. The end of the valuation period (i.e., the "valuation date") will be accelerated if there is a change in control of the Company. The High Performance Common Stock has a nominal value unless the total rate of shareholder return for the relevant valuation period exceeds the greater of: (1) 10.00%, 20.00%, or 30.00% for the 2002 plan, the 2003 plan and the 2004 plan, respectively; and (2) a weighted industry index total rate of return consisting of equal weightings of the Russell 1000 Financial Index and the Morgan Stanley REIT Index for the relevant period.

If the total rate of return on the Company's Common Stock exceeds the threshold performance levels for a particular plan, then distributions will be paid on the shares of High Performance Common Stock related to that plan in the same amounts and at the same times as distributions are paid on a number of shares of the Company's Common Stock equal to the following: 7.50% of the Company's excess total rate of return (over the higher of the two threshold performance levels) multiplied by the weighted average market value of the Company's common equity capitalization during the measurement period, all as divided by the average closing price of a share of the Company's Common Stock for the 20 trading days immediately preceding the applicable valuation date.

If the total rate of return on the Company's Common Stock does not exceed the threshold performance levels for a particular plan, then the shares of High Performance Common Stock related to that plan will have only nominal value. In this event, each of the 5,000 shares will be entitled to dividends

equal to 0.01 times the dividend paid on a share of Common Stock, if and when dividends are declared on the Common Stock.

Regardless of how much the Company's total rate of return exceeds the threshold performance levels, the dilutive impact to the Company's shareholders resulting from distributions on High Performance Common Stock in each plan is limited to the equivalent of 1.00% of the number of shares of the Company's Common Stock outstanding, on a fully diluted basis, on the valuation date for each plan.

The employee participants have purchased their interests in High Performance Common Stock through a limited liability company at purchase prices approved by the Company's Board of Directors. The Company's Board has established the prices of the High Performance Common Stock based upon, among other things, an independent valuation from a major securities firm. The aggregate initial purchase prices were set on June 25, 2002 and were approximately $2.8 million, $1.8 million and $1.3 million for the 2002, 2003 and 2004 plans, respectively. No employee is permitted to exchange his or her interest in the LLC for shares of High Performance Common Stock prior to the applicable valuation date.

The total shareholder return for the valuation period under the 2002 plan was 21.94%, which exceeded both the fixed performance threshold of 10.00% and the industry index return of (5.83%). As a result of this superior performance, the participants in the 2002 plan are entitled to receive cash distributions equivalent to the amount of cash dividends payable on 819,254 shares of the Company's Common Stock, as and when such dividends are paid. Such dividend payments began with the first quarter 2003 dividend. The Company will pay dividends on the 2002 plan shares in the same amount per equivalent share and on the same distribution dates that shares of the Company's Common Stock are paid. The Company has the right, but not the obligation, to repurchase at cost 50.00% of the interests earned by an employee in the 2002 plan if the employee breaches certain non-competition, non-solicitation and confidentiality covenants through January 1, 2005.

A new 2005 plan has been established with a three-year valuation period ending December 31, 2005. Awards under the 2005 plan were approved on January 14, 2003. The 2005 plan has 5,000 shares of High Performance Common Stock with an aggregate initial purchase price of $573,000. The purchase price of the High Performance Common Stock was established by the Company's Board based upon, among other things, an independent valuation from a major securities firm. The provisions of the 2005 plan are substantially the same as the prior plans.

The additional equity from the issuance of the High Performance Common Stock is recorded as a separate class of stock and included within shareholders' equity on the Company's balance sheet. Net income allocable to common shareholders will be reduced by the HPU holders' share of dividends paid and undistributed earnings, if any.

Effective November 4, 1999, the Company implemented a savings and retirement plan (the "401(k) Plan"), which is a voluntary, defined contribution plan. All employees are eligible to participate in the 401(k) Plan following completion of three months of continuous service with the Company. Each participant may contribute on a pretax basis up to the maximum percentage of compensation and dollar amount permissible under Section 402(g) of the Internal Revenue Code not to exceed the limits of Code Sections 401(k), 404 and 415. At the discretion of the Board of Directors, the Company may make matching contributions on the participant's behalf of up to 50.00% of the first 10.00% of the participant's annual compensation. The Company made gross contributions of approximately $78,000 and $74,000 to the 401(k) Plan for the three months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, and $285,000 and $245,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2002.

The following table presents a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted EPS calculations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively (in thousands, except per share data):

In addition, there were approximately 5,000 stock options, 6.1 million warrants and 297,728 joint venture shares that were antidilutive for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, there were approximately 100,000 stock options, 6.1 million warrants and 370,547 joint venture shares that were antidilutive.

In June 1997, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 130 ("SFAS No. 130"), "Reporting Comprehensive Income" effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 1997. The statement changes the reporting of certain items currently reported as changes in the shareholders' equity section of the balance sheet and establishes standards for the reporting and display of comprehensive income and its components in a full set of general-purpose financial statements. SFAS No. 130 requires that all components of comprehensive income shall be reported in the financial statements in the period in which they are recognized. Furthermore, a total amount for comprehensive income shall be displayed in the financial statements. Total comprehensive income was $76.6 million and $50.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, and $149.1 million and $115.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The primary components of comprehensive income other than net income consist of amounts attributable to the adoption and continued application of SFAS No. 133 to the Company's cash flow hedges and changes in the fair value of the Company's available-for-sale investments.

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, the change in fair market value of the Company's unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale investments and cash flow hedges was an increase of $6.9 million and $11.4 million, respectively, and was recorded as an adjustment to other comprehensive income. The reconciliation to other comprehensive income is as follows (in thousands):

Unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale investments and cash flow hedges are recorded as adjustments to shareholders' equity (through "Accumulated other comprehensive income (losses)" on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets), and are not included in adjusted earnings or net income unless realized.

As of June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, accumulated other comprehensive income (losses) reflected in the Company's shareholders' equity is comprised of the following (in thousands):

In order to maintain its election to qualify as a REIT, the Company must currently distribute, at a minimum, an amount equal to 90.00% of its taxable income and must distribute 100.00% of its taxable income to avoid paying corporate federal income taxes. The Company anticipates it will distribute all of its taxable income to its shareholders. Because taxable income differs from cash flow from operations due to non-cash revenues or expenses (such as depreciation), in certain circumstances, the Company may generate operating cash flow in excess of its dividends or, alternatively, may be required to borrow to make sufficient dividend payments.

Total dividends declared by the Company aggregated $65.9 million, or $0.6625 per share on Common Stock for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003. This dividend, paid on April 29, 2003 was applicable to the three months ended March 31, 2003 and payable to shareholders of record on April 15, 2003. On July 1, 2003, the Company declared a dividend of $0.6625 per share of Common Stock, applicable to the second quarter and payable to shareholders of record on July 15, 2003. The Company also declared dividends aggregating $10.5 million, $2.4 million, $1.4 million and $4.0 million, respectively, on its Series A, B, C and D preferred stock, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2003. There are no divided arrearages on any of the preferred shares currently outstanding.

The Series A preferred stock has a liquidation preference of $50.00 per share and carries an initial dividend yield of 9.50% per annum. The dividend rate on the preferred shares will increase to 9.75% on December 15, 2005, to 10.00% on December 15, 2006 and to 10.25% on December 15, 2007 and thereafter. Dividends on the Series A preferred shares are payable quarterly in arrears and are cumulative.

Holders of shares of the Series B preferred stock are entitled to receive, when and as declared by the Board of Directors, out of funds legally available for the payment of dividends, cumulative preferential cash dividends at the rate of 9.375% per annum of the $25.00 liquidation preference, equivalent to a fixed annual rate of $2.34 per share. Dividends are cumulative from the date of original issue and are payable quarterly in arrears on or before the 15th day of each March, June, September and December or, if not a business day, the next succeeding business day. Any dividend payable on the Series B preferred stock for any partial dividend period will be computed on the basis of a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months. Dividends will be payable to holders of record as of the close of business on the first day of the calendar month in which the applicable dividend payment date falls or on another date designated by the Board of Directors of the Company for the payment of dividends that is not more than 30 nor less than ten days prior to the dividend payment date.

Holders of shares of the Series C preferred stock are entitled to receive, when and as declared by the Board of Directors, out of funds legally available for the payment of dividends, cumulative preferential cash dividends at the rate of 9.20% per annum of the $25.00 liquidation preference, equivalent to a fixed annual rate of $2.30 per share. The remaining terms relating to dividends of the Series C preferred stock are substantially identical to the terms of the Series B preferred stock described above.

Holders of shares of the Series D preferred stock are entitled to receive, when and as declared by the Board of Directors, out of funds legally available for the payment of dividends, cumulative preferential cash dividends at the rate of 8.00% per annum of the $25.00 liquidation preference, equivalent to a fixed annual rate of $2.00 per share. The remaining terms relating to dividends of the Series D preferred stock are substantially identical to the terms of the Series B preferred stock described above.

The 2002 High Performance Unit Program reached its valuation date on December 31, 2002. Based on the Company's 2002 total rate of return, the participants are entitled to receive cash dividends on 819,254 shares of the Company's Common Stock. The Company will pay dividends on these units in the same amount per equivalent share and on the same distribution dates as shares of the Company's Common Stock. Such dividend payments began with the first quarter 2003 dividend and reduce net income allocable to common shareholders when paid. Additionally, net income allocable to common shareholders will be reduced by the HPU holders' share of undistributed earnings, if any.

The exact amount of future quarterly dividends to common shareholders will be determined by the Board of Directors based on the Company's actual and expected operations for the fiscal year and the Company's overall liquidity position.

Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 131 ("SFAS No. 131") establishes standards for the way that public business enterprises report information about operating segments in annual financial statements and requires that those enterprises report selected financial information about operating segments in interim financial reports issued to shareholders.

The Company has two reportable segments: Real Estate Lending and Corporate Tenant Leasing. The Company does not have any foreign operations. The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in Note 3. The Company has no single customer that accounts for more than 3.81% of revenues (see Note 9 for other information regarding concentrations of credit risk).

The Company evaluates performance based on the following financial measures for each segment:

In July 2003, the Company completed an underwritten public offering of 5.6 million shares of its 7⁷/8% Series E Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, having a liquidation preference of $25.00 per share. The Series E Preferred Stock was issued in exchange for 2.8 million shares of the Company's 9.50% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, having a liquidation preference of $50.00 per share. The Company did not receive any cash proceeds from the offering.

Item 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The Company began its business in 1993 through private investment funds formed to take advantage of the lack of well-capitalized lenders capable of servicing the needs of high-end customers in its markets. In March 1998, the private investment funds contributed their approximately $1.1 billion of assets to the Company's predecessor in exchange for a controlling interest in that public company. In November 1999, the Company acquired its leasing subsidiary, TriNet Corporate Realty Trust, Inc. ("TriNet" or the "Leasing Subsidiary"), which was then the largest publicly-traded company specializing in corporate sale/leaseback for office and industrial facilities (the "TriNet Acquisition"). Concurrent with the TriNet Acquisition, the Company also acquired its former external advisor in exchange for shares of its Common Stock and converted its organizational form to a Maryland corporation. The Company's Common Stock began trading on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol "SFI" in November 1999.

Three Months Ended June 30, 2003 Compared to the Three Months Ended June 30, 2002

Interest income—Interest income increased by $9.7 million to $74.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003 from $64.4 million for the same period in 2002. This increase was primarily due to $19.6 million of interest income on new originations or additional fundings, net of a $9.6 million decrease from the repayment of loans and other lending investments. This increase was partially offset by a decrease in interest income on the Company's variable-rate lending investments as the result of lower average one-month LIBOR rates of 1.26% in 2003, compared to 1.85% in 2002.

Operating lease income—Operating lease income increased by $8.3 million to $67.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003 from $58.7 million for the same period in 2002. Of this increase, $9.7 million was attributable to new corporate tenant lease investments. This increase was partially offset by lower operating lease income on certain corporate tenant lease assets.

Other income—Other income generally consists of prepayment penalties and realized gains from the early repayment of loans and other lending investments, financial advisory and asset management fees, lease termination fees, mortgage servicing fees, loan participation payments and dividends on certain investments. During the three months ended June 30, 2003, other income included realized gains on sales of investments, loan repayments and prepayment penalties of $7.5 million, asset management, mortgage servicing and other fees of approximately $796,000, and other miscellaneous income such as dividend payments of $125,000.

During the three months ended June 30, 2002, other income included prepayment penalties and realized gains on loan repayments of $4.2 million, loan participation payments of $3.2 million and asset management, mortgage servicing and other fees of approximately $147,000.

Interest expense—For the three months ended June 30, 2003, interest expense increased by $3.4 million to $50.2 million from $46.8 million for the same period in 2002. This increase was primarily due to higher average borrowings on the Company's debt obligations, term loans and secured notes, and by approximately $941,000 of additional amortization of deferred financing costs on the Company's debt obligations in 2003 compared to the same period in 2002. This increase was partially offset by lower average one-month LIBOR rates on the unhedged portion of the Company's variable-rate debt of 1.26%, compared to 1.85% in 2002.

Operating costs—corporate tenant lease assets—For the three months ended June 30, 2003, operating costs increased by approximately $927,000 from $3.0 million to $3.9 million for the same period in 2002. This increase is primarily related to new corporate tenant lease investments and higher operating costs on certain corporate tenant lease assets.

Depreciation and amortization—Depreciation and amortization increased by $2.1 million to $13.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003 from $11.6 million for the same period in 2002. This increase is primarily due to new corporate tenant lease investments.

General and administrative—For the three months ended June 30, 2003, general and administrative expenses increased by approximately $894,000 to $9.0 million, compared to $8.1 million for the same period in 2002. This increase is primarily the result of an increase in personnel and related costs.

General and administrative—stock-based compensation—General and administrative-stock-based compensation decreased by $6.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003 compared to the same period in 2002 primarily due to the non-cash charge related to the performance-based vesting of 500,000 restricted shares granted under the Company's long-term incentive plan in 2002.

Provision for loan losses—The Company's charge for provision for loan losses decreased to $1.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003 compared to the same period in 2002. As more fully discussed in Note 4 to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements, the Company has experienced minimal actual losses on its loan investments to date. The Company considers it prudent to reflect provisions for loan losses on a portfolio basis based upon the Company's assessment of general market conditions, the Company's internal risk management policies and credit risk rating system, industry loss experience, the Company's assessment of the likelihood of delinquencies or defaults, and the value of the collateral underlying its investments. Accordingly, since its first full quarter operating its current business as a public company (the quarter ended June 30, 1998), management has reflected quarterly provisions for loan losses in its operating results.

Loss on early extinguishment of debt—For the three months ended June 30, 2003, the Company did not have any losses on early extinguishment of debt.

For the three months ended June 30, 2002, the Company had $12.2 million of losses on early extinguishment of debt associated with the prepayment penalties and amortization of deferred financing fess related to the repayment of the STARs, Series 2000-1 bonds. In accordance with SFAS No. 145 these costs were reclassified from "Extraordinary loss on extinguishments of debt" into continuing operations as of January 1, 2003.

Equity in (loss) earnings from joint ventures and unconsolidated subsidiaries—For the three months ended June 30, 2003, equity in (loss) earnings from joint ventures and unconsolidated subsidiaries decreased by $518,000 to approximately $(100,000) from approximately $418,000 for the same period in 2002. This decrease is primarily due to the consolidation of one of the Company's corporate tenant lease joint venture investments.

(Loss) income from discontinued operations—For the three months ended June 30, 2003, operating loss incurred by the Company on corporate tenant lease assets sold (prior to their sale) and assets held for sale was approximately $(150,000).

For the three months ended June 30, 2002, operating income earned by the Company on corporate tenant lease assets sold (prior to their sale) and assets held for sale was approximately $1.3 million. The income or loss from these assets is classified as "discontinued operations," even though such income or loss was recognized by the Company prior to the asset dispositions or classification as "held for sale."

Gain from discontinued operations—During the three months ended June 30, 2003, the Company did not dispose of any corporate tenant lease assets.

During the three months ended June 30, 2002, the Company disposed of one corporate tenant lease asset for net proceeds of $3.7 million, and recognized a gain of approximately $595,000.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2003 Compared to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2002

Interest income—Interest income increased by $27.2 million to $147.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003 from $120.3 million for the same period in 2002. This increase was primarily due to $43.4

million of interest income on new originations or additional fundings, net of a $17.4 million decrease from the repayment of loans and other lending investments. This increase was partially offset by a decrease in interest income on the Company's variable-rate lending investments as the result of lower average one-month LIBOR rates of 1.30% in 2003, compared to 1.85% in 2002.

Operating lease income—Operating lease income increased by $18.8 million to $132.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003 from $113.7 million for the same period in 2002. Of this increase, $22.7 million was attributable to new corporate tenant lease investments. This increase was partially offset by lower operating lease income on certain corporate tenant lease assets.

Other income—Other income generally consists of prepayment penalties and realized gains from the early repayment of loans and other lending investments, financial advisory and asset management fees, lease termination fees, mortgage servicing fees, loan participation payments and dividends on certain investments. During the six months ended June 30, 2003, other income included realized gains on sales of investments, loan repayments and prepayment penalties of $10.5 million, asset management, mortgage servicing and other fees of approximately $2.0 million and other miscellaneous income such as dividend payments of $238,000.

During the six months ended June 30, 2002, other income primarily included financial advisory, asset management, mortgage servicing and other fees of $7.5 million, prepayment penalties and realized gains on loan repayment of $5.9 million and loan participation payments of $3.3 million.

Interest expense—For the six months ended June 30, 2003, interest expense increased by $9.7 million to $98.2 million from $88.5 million for the same period in 2002. This increase was primarily due to higher average borrowings on the Company's debt obligations, term loans and secured notes, and by approximately $1.7 million of additional amortization of deferred financing costs on the Company's debt obligations in 2003 compared to the same period in 2002. This increase was partially offset by lower average one-month LIBOR rates on the unhedged portion of the Company's variable-rate debt of 1.30%, compared to 1.85% in 2002.

Operating costs—corporate tenant lease assets—For the six months ended June 30, 2003, operating costs increased by $1.8 million from $6.0 million to $7.8 million for the same period in 2002. This increase is primarily related to new corporate tenant lease investments and higher operating costs on certain corporate tenant lease assets.

Depreciation and amortization—Depreciation and amortization increased by $4.8 million to $27.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003 from $22.2 million for the same period in 2002. This increase is primarily due to new corporate tenant lease investments.

General and administrative—For the six months ended June 30, 2003, general and administrative expenses increased by $1.9 million to $16.7 million, compared to $14.8 million for the same period in 2002. This increase is primarily the result of an increase in personnel and related costs.

General and administrative—stock-based compensation—General and administrative-stock-based compensation decreased by $6.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003 compared to the same period in 2002 primarily due to the non-cash charge related to the performance-based vesting of 500,000 restricted shares granted under the Company's long-term incentive plan in 2002.

Provision for loan losses—The Company's charge for provision for loan losses decreased to $3.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003 compared to $3.8 million in the same period in 2002. As more fully discussed in Note 4 to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements, the Company has experienced minimal actual losses on its loan investments to date. The Company considers it prudent to reflect provisions for loan losses on a portfolio basis based upon the Company's assessment of general market conditions, the Company's internal risk management policies and credit risk rating system, industry loss experience, the Company's assessment of the likelihood of delinquencies or defaults, and the value of the collateral underlying its investments. Accordingly, since its first full quarter operating its current business as a public company (the quarter ended June 30, 1998), management has reflected quarterly provisions for loan losses in its operating results.

Loss on early extinguishment of debt—For the six months ended June 30, 2003, the Company did not have any losses on early extinguishment of debt.

For the six months ended June 30, 2002, the Company had $12.2 million of losses on early extinguishment of debt associated with the prepayment penalties and amortization of deferred financing fess related to the repayment of the STARs, Series 2000-1 bonds. In accordance with SFAS No. 145 these costs were reclassified from "Extraordinary loss on extinguishments of debt" into continuing operations as of January 1, 2003.

Equity in (loss) earnings from joint ventures and unconsolidated subsidiaries—For the six months ended June 30, 2003, equity in (loss) earnings from joint ventures and unconsolidated subsidiaries decreased by $1.4 million to approximately $(158,000) from approximately $1.2 million for the same period in 2002. This decrease is primarily due to the consolidation of one of the Company's corporate tenant lease joint venture investments.

(Loss) income from discontinued operations—For the six months ended June 30, 2003, operating loss incurred by the Company on corporate tenant lease assets sold (prior to their sale) and assets held for sale was approximately $(278,000).

For the six months ended June 30, 2002, operating income earned by the Company on corporate tenant lease assets sold (prior to their sale) and assets held for sale was approximately $2.7 million. The income or loss from these assets is classified as "discontinued operations," even though such income or loss was recognized by the Company prior to the asset dispositions or classification as "held for sale."

Gain from discontinued operations—During the six months ended June 30, 2003, the Company disposed of one corporate tenant lease asset for net proceeds of $4.0 million and recognized a gain of approximately $264,000.

During the six months ended June 30, 2002, the Company disposed of one corporate tenant lease asset for net proceeds of $3.7 million, and recognized a gain of approximately $595,000.

Adjusted earnings represents net income to common shareholders and HPU holders computed in accordance with GAAP, before depreciation, amortization, gain (loss) from discontinued operations, extraordinary items and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle. Adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures reflect the Company's share of adjusted earnings calculated on the same basis.

The Company believes that to facilitate a clear understanding of the historical operating results of the Company, adjusted earnings should be examined in conjunction with net income as shown in the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations. Adjusted earnings should not be considered as an alternative to net income (determined in accordance with GAAP) as an indicator of the Company's performance, or to cash flows from operating activities (determined in accordance with GAAP) as a measure of the Company's liquidity, nor is it indicative of funds available to fund the Company's cash needs or available for distribution to the Company's shareholders. The Company's management believes that adjusted earnings more closely approximates operating cash flow and is a useful measure for investors to consider, in conjunction with net income and other GAAP measures, in evaluating the Company's financial performance. This is primarily because the Company is a commercial finance company that focuses on real estate lending and corporate tenant leasing; therefore, the Company's net income (determined in accordance with GAAP) reflects significant non-cash depreciation expense on corporate tenant lease assets. Several of the Company's material borrowing arrangements contain covenants based on adjusted earnings, therefore, the Company must monitor adjusted earnings in order to ensure

compliance with these covenants. It should be noted that the Company's manner of calculating adjusted earnings may differ from the calculation of similarly-titled measures by other companies.

First Dollar and Last Dollar Exposure—One component of the Company's risk management assessment is an analysis of the Company's first and last dollar loan-to-value percentage with respect to the properties or companies the Company finances. First dollar loan-to-value represents the weighted average beginning point for the Company's lending exposure in the aggregate capitalization of the underlying properties or companies it finances. Last dollar loan-to-value represents the weighted average ending point for the Company's lending exposure in the aggregate capitalization of the underlying properties or companies it finances.

Non-Accrual Loans—The Company transfers loans to non-accrual status at such time as: (1) management believes that the potential risk exists that scheduled debt service payments will not be met within the coming 12 months; (2) the loan becomes 90 days delinquent; (3) management determines the borrower is incapable of, or ceased efforts toward, curing the cause of an impairment; or (4) the net realizable value of the loan's underlying collateral approximates the Company's carrying value of such loan. Interest income is recognized only upon actual cash receipt for loans on non-accrual status. As of June, 30, 2003, the Company had three assets on non-accrual status with an aggregate carrying value of $24.2 million, or 0.40% of the gross book value of the Company's investments. The Company is currently comfortable that it has adequate collateral to support the book values of the assets.

The first non-accrual loan is a $12.9 million junior participation in a first mortgage loan secured by a hotel property in New York, New York. This loan bears interest at a fixed rate of 7.91% and matures in

June 2006. The borrower remains current on all of its debt service payments to the Company and has continued to invest additional equity to fund on-going capital improvements at the property. The Company is comfortable that it has adequate collateral to support the book value of the asset. However, due to poor operating performance exacerbated by the decline in the hotel market in the New York metropolitan area, this loan was transferred to non-accrual effective June 30, 2003.

The second non-accrual loan is a $6.8 million subordinate trust certificate in a $27.4 million first mortgage secured by an office property in Louisville, Kentucky. The whole loan bears interest at 9.10% and matures in April, 2005. The property is experiencing near-term tenant rollover in a soft local real estate market and the loan was placed on non-accrual status effective June 30, 2003. However, the Company's last dollar exposure is significantly below replacement cost, and the loan remains current through June 30, 2003. The Company believes that it has adequate collateral to support the book value of the asset.

The third non-accrual loan is a partnership loan with a balance of $4.5 million as of June 30, 2003. The loan is presently secured by partnership interests in two partnerships owning facilities in Colorado leased to the U.S. Government. The Company made the loan in anticipation of buying the facilities upon their completion. The loan bears interest at LIBOR + 3.50%, with a LIBOR floor of 3.00%. The loan matured on March 29, 2003 and therefore is currently in default. In April 2003, the Company received a $1.2 million principal pay down. The borrower remains current on its regular interest obligations to the Company. However, as a result of the maturity default and the uncertainty surrounding the timing of the completion, and the sale or refinancing of the facilities, the loan remains on non-accrual status.

Watch List Assets—The Company conducts a quarterly comprehensive credit review, resulting in an individual risk rating being assigned to each asset. This review is designed to enable management to evaluate and proactively manage asset-specific credit issues and identify credit trends on a portfolio-wide basis as an "early warning system." As of June 30, 2003, the Company has four loans and three CTL investments that are on its credit watch list in addition to the three non-accrual loans mentioned above.

The Company has a $40.6 million first mortgage secured by a hotel property in New York, New York. This mortgage matures on April 30, 2005 and bears interest at LIBOR + 4.50%. The borrower remains current on all of its debt service payments to the Company, and the Company is currently comfortable that it has adequate collateral to support the book value of the asset. However, due to poor operating performance exacerbated by the decline in the hotel market in the New York metropolitan area, this loan remains on the watch list. Subsequent to June 30, 2003, the borrower invested an additional $3.2 million to fund additional reserves and to enable the Company to receive a $2.7 million principal paydown bringing the loan balance to $38.0 million and lowering the Company's basis in the collateral. In connection with this paydown, the Company lowered the coupon rate to LIBOR+3.15% and will sweep 50.00% of excess cashflow to fund a furniture, fixtures and equipment reserve with the remaining 50.00% used to pay down principal. When the reserve balance is equal to $1.2 million, the excess cashflow will go to pay down principal on the loan.

The second watch list loan is a $35.8 million junior interest in a $103.6 million first mortgage loan secured by a retail shopping mall in Chicago, Illinois. The whole loan bears interest at 8.88% and matures on January 1, 2004. The mall's cash flow has been negatively impacted by the departure of one of four anchor tenants. The borrower is negotiating with one of the remaining anchor tenants and a potential new tenant to fill the available space. The borrower has a significant equity investment in the property (including approximately $15.0 million of additional equity invested in 2001), and remains current on all of its debt service payments to the Company. The Company believes that it has adequate collateral to support the book value of the asset.

The third watch list loan is a $30.4 million partnership loan on a class A office building located in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. The loan was acquired as a part of the Company's acquisition of Lazard Freres structured finance portfolio in 1998. Lazard continues to retain a 10.00% interest in the loan. The loan

matures in March 2008 and bears interest at 17.50%, 11.00% of which is paid currently and 6.50% of which is accrued. The borrower remains current on all of its debt service payments to the Company, and the Company is currently comfortable that it has adequate collateral to support the book value of the asset. However, due to near-term tenant rollover in a soft local real estate market the loan has been placed on the Company's watch list and the Company is currently engaged in discussions with the borrower regarding potential modifications of the loan.

The fourth watch list loan is a $3.2 million partnership loan on two shopping malls located in the suburbs of Washington, D.C. This investment was part of a larger loan originally made by affiliates of Lazard Freres prior to the Company's acquisition of Lazard's structured finance portfolio in 1998. The loan matures in September 2003 and bears interest at 12.00%. The Company received cash payments equal to the interest due on the loan during the six months ended June 30, 2003, together with additional cash payments applied to principal. Subsequent to quarter end, the borrower made an additional $1.0 million payment towards principal. The borrower remains current on its obligations to the Company.

The Company also has three CTL investments on its credit watch list. Effective June 30, 2003, the Company placed an office facility located in Denver, Colorado on its watch list with a net carrying value of $40.8 million and operating lease income of $3.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003. There has been an industry-wide downturn in the tenant's business that has resulted in poor operating performance and financial uncertainty, however, the tenant is current on its operating lease payments and the Company believes that the carrying value of the asset is not impaired.

The second CTL investment on the Company's watch list is an investment in a joint venture which owns a corporate tenant lease asset located in Milpitas, California. The facility's primary tenant is experiencing financial uncertainty and has announced a plan to restructure its debt and equity capital. At this time it is not possible to determine whether the customer will file a plan of reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. As of June 30, 2003, the Company's equity investment in the joint venture was $13.0 million. The Company's share of income from this equity investment was $935,000 and its share of operating lease income from the primary customer was $4.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003. The Company believes that the carrying value of the asset is not impaired.

The third CTL investment on the Company's watch list is one of two office facilities located in Denver, Colorado and leased to a company which filed a voluntary petition for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. The customer utilizes these facilities as the U.S. headquarters for one of its major business lines. Since its bankruptcy filing, the customer has consolidated its space needs into the larger of the two facilities, including approximately 150 of its employees from other area locations. The customer has also invested approximately $3.0 million of its own capital in the facilities. In December 2002, the bankruptcy court approved a plan of reorganization. As part of the reorganization, the customer attempted to affirm the lease on the larger facility and terminate the lease on the smaller facility. Due to certain provisions of the lease, and the fact that the two leases are cross-defaulted, the Company believes the customer's affirmation of the larger facility lease is also an affirmation of the smaller facility. The customer remains current on the larger facility's lease payment to the Company, but has withheld its lease payment since March 26, 2003 on the smaller facility pending final resolution by the bankruptcy court. Therefore, the smaller facility (with a net carrying value of $3.5 million as of June 30, 2003) remains on the Company's watch list.

The Company requires capital to fund its investment activities and operating expenses. The Company has significant access to capital resources to fund its existing business plan, which includes the expansion of its real estate lending and corporate tenant leasing businesses. The Company's capital sources include cash flow from operations, borrowings under lines of credit, additional term borrowings, long-term financing secured by the Company's assets, unsecured financing and the issuance of common, convertible and/or

preferred equity securities. Further, the Company may acquire other businesses or assets using its capital stock, cash or a combination thereof.

The distribution requirements under the REIT provisions of the Code limit the Company's ability to retain earnings and thereby replenish or increase capital committed to its operations. However, the Company believes that its significant capital resources and access to financing will provide it with financial flexibility and market responsiveness at levels sufficient to meet current and anticipated capital requirements, including expected new lending and corporate tenant leasing transactions.

The Company believes that its existing sources of funds will be adequate for purposes of meeting its short- and long-term liquidity needs. The Company's ability to meet its long-term (i.e., beyond one year) liquidity requirements is subject to obtaining additional debt and equity financing. Any decision by the Company's lenders and investors to enter into such transactions with the Company will depend upon a number of factors, such as compliance with the terms of its existing credit arrangements, the Company's financial performance, industry or market trends, the general availability of and rates applicable to financing transactions, such lenders' and investors' resources and policies concerning the terms under which they make such capital commitments and the relative attractiveness of alternative investment or lending opportunities.

The following table outlines the contractual obligations related to the Company's long-term debt agreements and operating lease obligations as of June 30, 2003. There are no other long-term liabilities of the Company that would constitute a contractual obligation.

The Company has four LIBOR-based secured revolving credit facilities with an aggregate maximum availability of $2.4 billion, of which $1.1 billion was drawn as of June 30, 2003 (see Note 7 to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements). Availability under these facilities is based on collateral provided under a borrowing base calculation. At June 30, 2003, the Company also had an unsecured credit facility totaling $300.0 million which bears interest at LIBOR + 2.125% per annum and matures in July 2004. At June 30, 2003, the Company had not drawn any amounts under this facility.

Recent Financing Activities—On May 21, 2003, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company issued iStar Asset Receivables ("STARs"), Series 2003-1, the Company's proprietary match funding program, consisting of $645.8 million of investment-grade bonds secured by the subsidiary's structured finance and corporate tenant lease assets, which had an aggregate carrying value of approximately $739.1 million at inception. Principal payments received on the assets will be utilized to repay the most senior class of the bonds then outstanding. The maturity of the bonds match funds the maturity of the underlying assets financed under the program. The weighted average interest rate on the bonds, on an all-floating rate basis, was approximately LIBOR + 0.47% at inception. For accounting purposes, this transaction was treated as a secured financing: the underlying assets and STARs liabilities remained on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets, and no gain on sale was recognized.

On May 14, 2003, the Company extended the maturity on its $300.0 million unsecured facility to July 2004.

On March 14, 2003, the Company remarketed the 6.75% Dealer Remarketable Securities of its Leasing Subsidiary by acquiring and retiring those securities and by issuing $150.0 million of 7.00% Senior Notes due 2008. The covenants in the Senior Notes due 2008 are substantially identical to the covenants contained in the Company's 8.75% Notes.

On January 27, 2003, the Company extended the maturity on one of its $700.0 million secured facilities to January 2007, which includes a one-year "term-out" at the Company's option.

On May 28, 2002, the Company repaid the then remaining $446.2 million of bonds outstanding under its STARs, Series 2000-1 financing. Simultaneously, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company issued STARs, Series 2002-1, consisting of $885.1 million of investment-grade bonds secured by the subsidiary's structured finance and corporate tenant lease assets, which had an aggregate outstanding carrying value of approximately $1.1 billion at inception. Principal payments received on the assets will be utilized to repay the most senior class of the bonds then outstanding. The maturity of the bonds match funds the maturity of the underlying assets financed under the program. The weighted average interest rate on the bonds, on an all-floating rate basis, is approximately LIBOR + 0.56% at inception. For accounting purposes, this

transaction was treated as a secured financing: the underlying assets and STARs liabilities remained on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets, and no gain on sale was recognized.

On March 29, 2002, the Company extended the maturity of its $500.0 million secured facility to August 2005, which includes a one-year "term-out" extension at the Company's option.

On August 9, 2001, the Company issued $350.0 million of 8.75% senior notes due in 2008. The notes are unsecured senior obligations of the Company. The Company used the net proceeds to partially repay outstanding borrowings under its secured credit facilities.

On July 27, 2001, the Company completed a $300.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility with a group of leading financial institutions. The facility has an initial maturity of July 2003, with a one-year extension at the Company's option and another one-year extension at the lenders' option. This facility replaces two prior credit facilities maturing in 2002 and 2003, and bears interest at LIBOR + 2.125%.

On February 22, 2001, the Company extended the maturity of its $350.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility to May 2002. On July 27, 2001, the Company repaid this facility and replaced it with a new $300.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility.

On January 11, 2001, the Company closed a $700.0 million secured revolving credit facility which is led by a major commercial bank. The facility has a three-year primary term and one-year "term-out" extension option, and bears interest at LIBOR + 1.40% to 2.15%, depending upon the collateral contributed to the borrowing base. This facility accepts a broad range of structured finance assets and has a final maturity of January 2005. On January 27, 2003, the Company extended the final maturity on this facility to January 2007.

Hedging Activities—The Company has variable-rate lending assets and variable-rate debt obligations. These assets and liabilities create a natural hedge against changes in variable interest rates. This means that as interest rates increase, the Company earns more on its variable-rate lending assets and pays more on its variable-rate debt obligations and, conversely, as interest rates decrease, the Company earns less on its variable-rate lending assets and pays less on its variable-rate debt obligations. When the amount of the Company's variable-rate debt obligations exceeds the amount of its variable-rate lending assets, the Company utilizes derivative instruments to limit the impact of changing interest rates on its net income.

The Company does not use derivative instruments to hedge assets or for speculative purposes. The derivative instruments the Company uses are typically in the form of interest rate swaps and interest rate caps. Interest rate swaps effectively change variable-rate debt obligations to fixed-rate debt obligations. Interest rate caps effectively limit the maximum interest rate on variable-rate debt obligations.

In addition, when appropriate the Company may occasionally enter into interest rate swaps that convert fixed-rate debt to variable rate in order to mitigate the risk of changes in fair value of the fixed-rate debt obligations.

The primary risks from the Company's use of derivative instruments is the risk that a counterparty to a hedging arrangement could default on its obligation and the risk that the Company may have to pay certain costs, such as transaction fees or breakage costs, if a hedging arrangement is terminated by the Company. As a matter of policy, the Company enters into hedging arrangements with counterparties that are large, creditworthy financial institutions typically rated at least "A" by Standard & Poor's ("S&P") and "A2" by Moody's Investors Service ("Moody's"). The Company's hedging strategy is approved and monitored by the Company's Audit Committee on behalf of its Board of Directors and may be changed by the Board of Directors without stockholder approval.

The Company has entered into the following cash flow hedges that are outstanding as of June 30, 2003. The net value associated with these hedges is reflected on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets (in thousands).

Type of Hedge	Notional Amount	Strike Price or Swap Rate	Trade Date		Maturity Date	Estimated Value at June 30, 2003
Pay-Fixed Swap	75,000	5.580%	11/4/99	(1)	12/1/04	$	(4,935	)
Pay-Fixed Swap	125,000	2.885%	1/23/03		6/25/06		(3,759	)
Pay-Fixed Swap	125,000	2.885%	2/11/03		6/25/06		(3,583	)
Pay-Floating Swap	100,000	3.878%	11/27/02		8/15/08		6,280
Pay-Floating Swap	50,000	3.810%	11/27/02		8/15/08		2,964
LIBOR Cap	345,000	8.000%	5/22/02		5/28/14		9,066
LIBOR Cap	75,000	7.750%	11/4/99	(1)	12/1/04		—
LIBOR Cap	35,000	7.750%	11/4/99	(1)	12/1/04		—

Total Estimated Value						$	6,033

Between January 1, 2002 and June 30, 2003, the Company had two cash flow hedges each with a notional amount of $125.0 million and a strike price of 7.058% and 7.055% that expired in June 2003.

In connection with STARs, Series 2002-1 in May 2002, the Company entered into a LIBOR interest rate cap struck at 8.00% in the notional amount of $345.0 million. The Company utilizes the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133 ("SFAS No. 133"), "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities," with respect to such instruments. SFAS No. 133 provides that the up-front fees paid on option-based products such as caps should be expensed into earnings based on the allocation of the premium to the affected periods as if the agreement were a series of "caplets." These allocated premiums are then reflected as a charge to income (as part of interest expense) in the affected period. On May 28, 2002, in connection with the STARs, Series 2002-1 transaction, the Company paid a premium of $13.7 million for this interest rate cap. Using the "caplet" methodology discussed above, amortization of the cap premium is dependent upon the actual value of the caplets at inception.

Certain of the Company's CTL joint ventures, have hedging activities which are more fully described in Note 6 to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.

Off-Balance Sheet Transactions—The Company is not dependent on the use of any off-balance sheet financing arrangements for liquidity. As of June 30, 2003, the Company had investments in three corporate tenant lease joint ventures accounted for under the equity method, which had total debt obligations outstanding of approximately $176.1 million. The Company's pro rata share of the ventures' third-party debt was approximately $77.0 million (see Note 6 to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements). These ventures were formed for the purpose of operating, acquiring and in certain cases, developing corporate tenant lease facilities. The debt obligations of these joint ventures are non-recourse to the ventures and the Company, and mature between fiscal years 2004 and 2011. As of June 30, 2003, the debt obligations consisted of six term loans bearing fixed rates per annum ranging from 7.61% to 8.43% and one variable-rate term loan with a rate of LIBOR + 1.25% per annum.

The Company has certain discretionary and non-discretionary unfunded commitments related to its loans and other lending investments that it may need to, or choose to, fund in the future. Discretionary commitments are those under which the Company has sole discretion with respect to future funding. Non-discretionary commitments are those under which the Company is generally obligated to fund at the request of the borrower or upon the occurrence of events outside of the Company's direct control. As of June 30, 2003, the Company had 14 loans with unfunded commitments totaling $186.5 million, of which $71.0 million was discretionary and $115.5 million was non-discretionary.

Ratings Triggers—On July 27, 2001, the Company completed a $300.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility with a group of leading financial institutions. The facility has an initial maturity of July 2003 with a one-year extension at the Company's option and another one-year extension at the lenders' option. This facility replaces two prior credit facilities maturing in 2002 and 2003, and bears interest at LIBOR + 2.125% per annum based on the Company's senior unsecured credit ratings of BB+ from S&P, Ba1 from Moody's and BBB- from Fitch Ratings. If the Company achieves a higher rating from either S&P or Moody's, the facility's interest rate will improve to LIBOR + 2.00% per annum. If the Company's credit rating is downgraded by any of the rating agencies (regardless of how far), the facility's interest rate will increase to LIBOR + 2.25% per annum. In the event the Company receives two credit ratings that are not equivalent, the spread over LIBOR shall be determined by the lower of the two such ratings. As of June 30, 2003, no amounts are outstanding on this facility. Accordingly, management does not believe any rating changes would have a material adverse impact on the Company's results of operations. There are no other ratings triggers in any of the Company's debt instruments or other operating or financial agreements.

On July 30, 2002, the Company's senior unsecured credit rating was upgraded to an investment grade rating of BBB- from BB+ by Fitch Ratings. In addition, Moody's and S&P raised their ratings outlook for the Company's senior unsecured credit rating to "positive."

Transactions with Related Parties—The Company has an investment in iStar Operating Inc. ("iStar Operating"), a taxable subsidiary that, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, services the Company's loans and certain loan portfolios owned by third parties. The Company owns all of the non-voting preferred stock and a 95.00% economic interest in iStar Operating. An affiliate of the Company's largest shareholder is the owner of all the voting common stock and a 5.00% economic interest in iStar Operating. As of June 30, 2003, there have never been any distributions to the common shareholder, nor does the Company expect to make any in the future. At any time, the Company has the right to acquire all of the common stock of iStar Operating at fair market value, which the Company believes to be nominal. In addition to the direct general and administrative costs of iStar Operating, the Company allocates a portion of its general overhead expenses to iStar Operating based on the number of employees at iStar Operating as a percentage of the Company's total employees.

iStar Operating has elected to be treated as a taxable REIT subsidiary for purposes of maintaining compliance with the REIT provisions of the Code and is accounted for under the equity method for financial statement reporting purposes and is presented in "Investments in and advances to joint ventures and unconsolidated subsidiaries" on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company will consolidate this entity as a VIE (see Note 3) effective July 1, 2003, with no material impact. As of June 30, 2003, iStar Operating had no debt obligations.

The Company entered into an employment agreement with its Chief Executive Officer as of March 31, 2001. In addition to the salary and bonus provisions of the agreement, the agreement provides for an award of 2.0 million phantom units to the executive, each of which notionally represents one share of the Company's Common Stock. Portions of these phantom units will vest on a contingent basis if the average closing price of the Company's Common Stock achieves certain levels (ranging from $25.00 to $37.00 per share) for 60 consecutive calendar days. The total rate of return (share price appreciation plus the reinvestment of dividends at market price on the date of distribution) from December 31, 2000 through June 30, 2003 was 127.18% Contingently vested units will become fully vested, meaning that they are no longer subject to forfeiture, if the executive remains employed through March 30, 2004, or earlier upon certain change of control and termination events. When and if contingently vested phantom units become fully vested units, the Company must deliver to the executive either a number of shares of Common Stock equal to the number of fully vested units or an amount of cash equal to the then fair market value of that number of shares of Common Stock. If shares were unavailable under the Company's then long-term incentive plans, this obligation could require the Company to make a substantial cash payment to the executive. See "Critical Accounting Policies—Executive Compensation" below for a discussion of the accounting treatment applicable to the compensation awarded to the Chief Executive Officer under this agreement.

The Company's Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Company and all majority-owned and controlled subsidiaries. The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions in certain circumstances that affect amounts reported in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. In preparing these financial statements, management has made its best estimates and judgments of certain amounts included in the financial statements, giving due consideration to materiality. The Company does not believe that there is a great likelihood that materially different amounts would be reported related to the accounting policies described below. However, application of these accounting policies involves the exercise of judgment and use of assumptions as to future uncertainties and, as a result, actual results could differ from these estimates.

Management has the obligation to ensure that its policies and methodologies are in accordance with GAAP. During the six months ended June 30, 2003, management reviewed and evaluated its critical accounting policies as further disclosed in the Company's December 31, 2002 Form 10-K and believes them to be appropriate. The Company's accounting policies are described in Note 3 to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements. The following are significant events relating to critical accounting policies during the six months ended June 30, 2003:

Executive Compensation—The Company's accounting policies generally provide cash compensation to be estimated and recognized over the period of service. With respect to stock-based compensation arrangements, as of July 1, 2002 (with retroactive application to the beginning of the calendar year), the Company has adopted the fair value method allowed under SFAS No. 123 on a prospective basis, which values options on the date of grant and recognizes an expense equal to the fair value of the option multiplied by the number of options granted over the related service period. Prior to the third quarter 2002, the Company elected to use APB 25 accounting, which measured the compensation charges based on

the intrinsic value of such securities when they become fixed and determinable, and recognized such expense over the related service period. These arrangements are often complex and generally structured to align the interests of management with those of the Company's shareholders. See Note 10 to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements for a detailed discussion of such arrangements and the related accounting effects.

During 2001, the Company entered into three-year employment agreements with its Chief Executive Officer and its former President. In addition, during 2002 the Company entered into a three-year employment agreement with its Chief Financial Officer. See Note 10 to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements for a more detailed description of these employment agreements.

The following is a hypothetical illustration of the effects on the Company's net income and adjusted earnings of the full vesting of phantom units under the employment agreement with the Chief Executive Officer. During the six months ended June 30, 2003, 1.0 million of the phantom shares awarded to the Chief Executive Officer were contingently vested. Subsequent to June 30, 2003, an additional 600,000 shares contingently vested. Absent an earlier change of control or termination of employment, these 1,600,000 shares will not become fully vested until March 31, 2004. Assuming that the market price of the Common Stock on March 31, 2004 is $36.50 (which was the market price of the Common Stock on June 30, 2003), the Company would incur a one-time non-cash charge to both net income and earnings at that time equal to $58.4 million (the fair market value of the 1,600,000 shares at $36.50 per share) subject to the availability of 1.6 million shares under the Company's LTIP.

On April 29, 2002, the 500,000 unvested restricted shares awarded to the President became contingently vested as the total shareholder return exceeded 60.00% and became fully vested on September 30, 2002 as all employment contingencies were met. The Company incurred a non-cash charge of approximately $15.0 million related to these vested shares, recognized ratably over the service period from the date of contingent vesting through September 30, 2002.

In May 2003, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 150 ("SFAS No. 150"), "Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments With Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity." This standard requires issuers to classify as liabilities the following three types of freestanding financial instruments: (1) mandatorily redeemable financial instruments, (2) obligations to repurchase the issuer's equity shares by transferring assets; and (3) certain obligations to issue a variable number of shares. The Company will adopt the provisions of this statement, as required, on July 1, 2003, and it is not expected to have a significant financial impact on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.

In January 2003, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 46 ("FIN 46"), "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities," an interpretation of ARB 51. FIN 46 provides guidance on identifying entities for which control is achieved through means other than through voting rights (a "variable interest entity" or "VIE"), and how to determine when and which business enterprise should consolidate a VIE. In addition, FIN 46 requires that both the primary beneficiary and all other enterprises with a significant variable interest in a VIE make additional disclosures. The transitional disclosure requirements took effect immediately and were required for all financial statements initially issued or modified after January 31, 2003. Immediate consolidation is required for VIEs entered into or modified after February 1, 2003 in which the Company is deemed the primary beneficiary. For VIEs in which the Company entered into prior to February 1, 2003 consolidation will be required by the Company effective with the Company's third quarter 2003 reporting. The adoption of the additional consolidation provisions of FIN 46 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's financial statements.

voluntary change to the fair value basis of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. However, this Statement does not permit the use of the original SFAS No. 123 prospective method of transition for changes to the fair value based method made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2003. In addition, this Statement amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123 to require prominent disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements about the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation, description of transition method utilized and the effect of the method used on reported results. The Company adopted SFAS No. 148 with retroactive application to grants made subsequent to January 1, 2002 with no material effect on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.

In June 2002, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 146 ("SFAS No. 146"), "Accounting for Exit or Disposal Activities," to address significant issues regarding the recognition, measurement, and reporting of costs that are associated with exit and disposal activities, including restructuring activities that are currently accounted for pursuant to the guidance that the Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") has set forth in EITF Issue No. 94-3, "Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring)." The scope of SFAS No. 146 also includes: (1) costs related to terminating a contract that is not a capital lease; and (2) termination benefits received by employees involuntarily terminated under the terms of a one-time benefit arrangement that is not an on-going benefit arrangement or an individual deferred-compensation contract. The provisions of SFAS No. 146 are effective for exit or disposal activities that are initiated after December 31, 2002. The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS 146 on December 31, 2002, as required, and it did not have a material effect on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statement.

In April 2002, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 145 ("SFAS No. 145"), "Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and

Technical Corrections." SFAS No. 145 rescinds both FASB Statements No. 4 ("SFAS No. 4"), "Reporting Gains and Losses from Extinguishment of Debt," and the amendment to SFAS No. 4, FASB Statement No. 64 ("SFAS No. 64"), "Extinguishments of Debt Made to Satisfy Sinking-Fund Requirements." Through this rescission, SFAS No. 145 eliminates the requirement (in both SFAS No. 4 and SFAS No. 64) that gains and losses from the extinguishment of debt be aggregated and, if material, classified as an extraordinary item, net of the related income tax effect. An entity is not prohibited from classifying such gains and losses as extraordinary items, so long as they meet the criteria in paragraph 20 of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 30 ("APB 30"), "Reporting the Results of Operations—Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions"; however, due to the nature of the Company's operations, such treatment may not be available to the Company. Any gains or losses on extinguishments of debt that were previously classified as extraordinary items in prior periods presented that do not meet the criteria in APB 30 for classification as an extraordinary item will be reclassified to income from continuing operations. The provisions of SFAS No. 145 are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after May 15, 2002. The Company adopted the provisions of this statement, as required, on January 1, 2003. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, the Company reclassified $12.2 million from "Extraordinary loss from early extinguishment of debt" into "Loss on early extinguishment of debt in continuing operations" on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations.

The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company's Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company's management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. The Company has formed a disclosure committee that is responsible for considering the materiality of information and determining the disclosure obligations of the Company on a timely basis. The disclosure committee reports directly to the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. The Chief Financial Officer is currently a member of the disclosure committee.

As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the disclosure committee and other members of management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures are effective to timely alert them to material information relating to the Company (including its consolidated subsidiaries) required to be included in the Company's Exchange Act filings.

There have been no significant changes in the Company's internal controls that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date that the Company carried out its evaluation

The Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company was held on June 3, 2003. A total of 95,357,566 votes were cast at the meeting by shareholders, representing 94.42% of the outstanding voting power of the Company's common stock and preferred stock, all series, voting as one class.

1. Election of Directors. At the meeting, four directors were elected for terms expiring in 2004. For each nominee, the numbers of votes cast for and withheld, and the percentages of total number of shares present represented by such votes, were as follows:

NOMINEE	FOR		WITHHELD
Jay Sugarman	93,992,234 (98.6	%)	1,365,332 (1.4	%)
Willis Andersen, Jr.	92,942,035 (97.5	%)	2,415,531 (2.5	%)
John G. McDonald	94,323,569 (99.0	%)	1,033,997 (1.0	%)
Jeffrey A. Weber	94,295,250 (98.9	%)	1,062,316 (1.1	%)

2. Charter Amendment. At the meeting, the shareholders also approved a proposed amendment to the Company's charter eliminating staggered terms for directors and providing instead for annual election of directors. The number of votes cast for and against the proposed charter amendment, the number of abstentions and the percentages of total number of shares present represented by such votes, were as follows:

	FOR		AGAINST		ABSTAIN
	93,207,613 (97.7%)		1,977,058 (2.1	%)	172,895 (0.2	%)

3. iStar Financial Executive and Director High Performance Unit Program. At the meeting, the shareholders also approved the proposed iStar Financial Executive and Director High Performance Unit Program. The number of votes cast for and against the proposal, the number of abstentions, the percentages of total number of shares present represented by such votes, and the number of broker non-votes, were as follows:

	FOR		AGAINST		ABSTAIN		NON-VOTES
	64,422,484 (92.3%)		4,992,326 (7.1	%)	392,367 (0.6	%)	25,550,338

4. Ratification of Auditors. Also at the meeting, the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company's independent public accountants for the year ending December 31, 2003 was ratified. The number of votes cast for and against the selection of accountants, as well as the number of abstentions, were as follows:

	FOR		AGAINST		ABSTAIN
	92,604,301 (97.1%)		1,677,167 (1.6	%)	1,076,097 (1.1	%)

Subsequent to the end of the quarter covered by this report, Andrew Farkas voluntarily resigned from the Company's Board of Directors to pursue other interests.

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

(Mark One)
ý	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003
OR
o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to

Maryland (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		95-6881527 (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
1114 Avenue of the Americas, 27^th Floor New York, NY (Address of principal executive offices)		10036 (Zip code)

Title of each class:		Name of Exchange on which registered:
Common Stock, $0.001 par value		New York Stock Exchange
9.375% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value		New York Stock Exchange
9.200% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value		New York Stock Exchange
8.000% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value		New York Stock Exchange

		As of June 30, 2003			As of December 31, 2002
ASSETS
Loans and other lending investments, net		$	3,409,989		$	3,050,342
Corporate tenant lease assets, net			2,332,499			2,291,805
Investments in and advances to joint ventures and unconsolidated subsidiaries			30,658			30,611
Assets held for sale			24,800			28,501
Cash and cash equivalents			55,115			15,934
Restricted cash			53,884			40,211
Accrued interest and operating lease income receivable			27,321			26,804
Deferred operating lease income receivable			43,893			36,739
Deferred expenses and other assets			147,295			90,750

	Total assets	$	6,125,454		$	5,611,697

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Liabilities:
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities		$	122,678		$	117,001
Dividends payable			5,225			5,225
Debt obligations			3,842,856			3,461,590

	Total liabilities		3,970,759			3,583,816

Commitments and contingencies			—			—
Minority interest in consolidated entities			2,581			2,581
Shareholders' equity:
Series A Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value, liquidation preference $50.00 per share, 4,400 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002			4			4
Series B Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value, liquidation preference $25.00 per share, 2,000 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002			2			2
Series C Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value, liquidation preference $25.00 per share, 1,300 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002			1			1
Series D Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value, liquidation preference $25.00 per share, 4,000 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002			4			4
High Performance Units			5,096			1,359
Common Stock, $0.001 par value, 200,000 shares authorized, 100,300 and 98,114 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively			100			98
Warrants and options			20,520			20,322
Additional paid-in capital			2,340,249			2,281,636
Retained earnings (deficit)			(174,937	)		(227,769	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (losses) (See Note 12)			9,131			(2,301	)
Treasury stock (at cost)			(48,056	)		(48,056	)

	Total shareholders' equity		2,152,114			2,025,300

	Total liabilities and shareholders' equity	$	6,125,454		$	5,611,697

			For the Three Months Ended June 30,						For the Six Months Ended June 30,
			2003			2002*			2003			2002*
Revenue:
	Interest income		$	74,079		$	64,395		$	147,506		$	120,271
	Operating lease income			66,971			58,680			132,495			113,654
	Other income			8,440			7,716			12,769			16,441

		Total revenue		149,490			130,791			292,770			250,366

Costs and expenses:
	Interest expense			50,191			46,775			98,171			88,464
	Operating costs—corporate tenant lease assets			3,898			2,971			7,758			5,992
	Depreciation and amortization			13,711			11,610			26,983			22,194
	General and administrative			9,038			8,144			16,719			14,761
	General and administrative—stock-based compensation expense			866			6,908			1,689			7,820
	Provision for loan losses			1,750			2,000			3,500			3,750
	Loss on early extinguishment of debt			—			12,166			—			12,166

		Total costs and expenses		79,454			90,574			154,820			155,147

Net income before equity in earnings from joint ventures and unconsolidated subsidiaries, minority interest and other items				70,036			40,217			137,950			95,219
Equity in (loss) earnings from joint ventures and unconsolidated subsidiaries				(100	)		418			(158	)		1,216
Minority interest in consolidated entities				(40	)		(41	)		(79	)		(81	)

Net income from continuing operations				69,896			40,594			137,713			96,354
(Loss) income from discontinued operations				(150	)		1,324			(278	)		2,674
Gain from discontinued operations				—			595			264			595

Net income				69,746			42,513			137,699			99,623
Preferred dividend requirements				(9,227	)		(9,227	)		(18,454	)		(18,454	)

Net income allocable to common shareholders and HPU holders(1)			$	60,519		$	33,286		$	119,245		$	81,169

Basic earnings per common share(2)			$	0.60		$	0.38		$	1.20		$	0.92

Diluted earnings per common share(2)(3)			$	0.59		$	0.36		$	1.16		$	0.89

	Series A Preferred Stock		Series B Preferred Stock		Series C Preferred Stock		Series D Preferred Stock		High Performance Units		Common Stock at Par		Warrants and Options		Additional Paid-In Capital		Retained Earnings (Deficit)			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Losses)			Treasury Stock			Total
Balance at December 31, 2002	$	4	$	2	$	1	$	4	$	1,359	$	98	$	20,322	$	2,281,636	$	(227,769	)	$	(2,301	)	$	(48,056	)	$	2,025,300
Exercise of options		—		—		—		—		—		—		198		14,861		—			—			—			15,059
Dividends declared—preferred		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		165		(18,454	)		—			—			(18,289	)
Dividends declared—HPUs		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		(536	)		—			—			(536	)
Dividends declared—common		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		(65,877	)		—			—			(65,877	)
Restricted stock units granted to employees		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		571		—			—			—			571
Options granted to employees		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		82		—			—			—			82
High performance units sold to employees		—		—		—		—		3,737		—		—		—		—			—			—			3,737
Issuance of stock—DRIP/Stock purchase plan		—		—		—		—		—		2		—		42,934		—			—			—			42,936
Net income for the period		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		137,699			—			—			137,699
Change in accumulated other comprehensive income (losses)		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—			11,432			—			11,432

Balance at June 30, 2003	$	4	$	2	$	1	$	4	$	5,096	$	100	$	20,520	$	2,340,249	$	(174,937	)	$	9,131		$	(48,056	)	$	2,152,114

		For the Three Months Ended June 30,						For the Six Months Ended June 30,
		2003			2002			2003			2002
Net income allocable to common shareholders and HPU holders, as reported(1)		$	60,519		$	33,286		$	119,245		$	81,169
Total stock-based compensation expense determined under fair value-based method for all awards, net of related tax effects			(24	)		(47	)		(48	)		(94	)

Pro forma net income		$	60,495		$	33,239		$	119,197		$	81,075

Earnings per share:
	Basic—as reported(2)	$	0.60		$	0.38		$	1.20		$	0.92
	Basic—pro forma(2)	$	0.60		$	0.37		$	1.20		$	0.92
	Diluted—as reported(2)(3)	$	0.59		$	0.36		$	1.16		$	0.89
	Diluted—pro forma(2)(3)	$	0.59		$	0.36		$	1.16		$	0.89

					Carrying Value as of
Type of Investment	Underlying Property Type	# of Borrowers In Class	Principal Balances Outstanding		June 30, 2003			December 31, 2002			Effective Maturity Dates	Contractual Interest Payment Rates(2)	Contractual Interest Accrual Rates(2)	Principal Amortization		Participation Features
Senior Mortgages	Office/Residential/ Retail/Industrial/ Conference Center/ Mixed Use/Hotel/ Entertainment/Other	35	$	1,839,905	$	1,804,748		$	1,675,797		2004 to 2020	Fixed: 7.03% to 10.30% Variable: Libor + 1.50% to Libor + 6.50%	Fixed: 7.03% to 10.30% Variable: Libor + 1.50% to Libor + 6.50%	Yes	(3)	No
Subordinate Mortgages(4)	Office/Residential/ Retail/Mixed Use/ Hotel	24		719,672		718,813			629,486		2003 to 2013	Fixed: 7.00% to 15.00% Variable: Libor + 1.79% to Libor + 5.50%	Fixed: 7.32% to 17.00% Variable: Libor + 1.79% to Libor + 5.50%	Yes	(3)	No
Corporate/Partnership Loans	Office/Residential/ Retail/Mixed Use/ Hotel/Entertainment/ Other	24		522,577		497,616			441,028		2003 to 2013	Fixed: 7.33% to 15.00% Variable: Libor + 3.50% to Libor + 8.00%	Fixed: 7.33% to 17.50% Variable: Libor + 3.50% to Libor + 8.00%	Yes	(3)	Yes	(5)
Other Lending Investments—Loans	Office/Mixed Use	4		30,771		24,485			23,167		2006 to 2008	Fixed: 10.00% Variable: Libor + 4.75%	Fixed: 10.00% Variable: Libor + 4.75%	No		Yes	(5)
Other Lending Investments—Securities(6)	Residential/ Retail/Industrial/ Mixed Use/ Hotel/ Entertainment/Other	13		391,583		397,077			310,114		2003 to 2013	Fixed: 6.75% to 12.50% Variable: Libor + 3.88% to Libor + 8.27%	Fixed: 6.75% to 12.50% Variable: Libor +3.88% to Libor + 8.27%	Yes	(3)	No

Gross Carrying Value					$	3,442,739		$	3,079,592
Provision for Loan Losses						(32,750	)		(29,250	)

Total, Net					$	3,409,989		$	3,050,342

						JV Income (Loss) for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2003			Pro Rata Share of Third-Party Non-Recourse Debt(1)		Third-Party Debt
Unconsolidated Joint Ventures and Subsidiaries		Ownership %		Equity Investment		JV Income (Loss) for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2003			Pro Rata Share of Third-Party Non-Recourse Debt(1)		Interest Rate	Scheduled Maturity Date
Unconsolidated Joint Ventures:
	Sunnyvale	44.70	%	$	11,340	$	545		$	10,728	LIBOR + 1.25%	November 2004(2)
	CTC I	50.00	%		13,016		497			59,845	7.66% — 7.87%	Various through 2011
	ACRE Simon	20.00	%		5,078		36			6,475	7.61% — 8.43%	Various through 2011
Unconsolidated Subsidiaries:
	iStar Operating	95.00	%		1,224		(1,178	)		—	N/A	N/A

	Total			$	30,658	$	(100	)	$	77,048

					Carrying Value as of
			Maximum Amount Available		Carrying Value as of						Stated Interest Rates(1)	Scheduled Maturity Date
			Maximum Amount Available		June 30, 2003			December 31, 2002			Stated Interest Rates(1)	Scheduled Maturity Date
Secured revolving credit facilities:
	Line of credit		$	700,000	$	189,640		$	412,550		LIBOR + 1.75% — 2.25%	March 2005(2)
	Line of credit			700,000		567,193			462,920		LIBOR + 1.40% — 2.15%	January 2007(2)
	Line of credit			500,000		293,980			283,884		LIBOR + 1.50% — 1.75%	August 2005(2)
	Line of credit			500,000		62,352			114,400		LIBOR + 1.50% — 2.25%	September 2005
Unsecured revolving credit facilities:
	Line of credit			300,000		—			—		LIBOR + 2.125%	July 2004(3)

	Total revolving credit facilities		$	2,700,000	$	1,113,165		$	1,273,754

Secured term loans:
	Secured by corporate tenant lease assets					193,000			193,000		LIBOR + 1.85%	July 2006(4)
	Secured by corporate tenant lease assets					142,296			144,114		7.44%	March 2009
	Secured by corporate tenant lease assets					93,964			95,074		6.00% – 11.38%	Various through 2022
	Secured by corporate lending investments					78,542			79,126		6.55%	November 2005
	Secured by corporate lending investments					61,194			61,537		6.41%	December 2012
	Secured by corporate lending investments					60,000			60,000		LIBOR + 2.50%	June 2004(3)
	Secured by corporate lending investments					—			50,000		LIBOR + 2.50%	July 2006(3)(5)
	Secured by corporate lending investments					50,000			—		LIBOR + 0.60%	October 2003(5)

	Total term loans					678,996			682,851
	Less: debt discount					(153	)		(236	)

	Total secured term loans					678,843			682,615
iStar Asset Receivables secured notes:
	STARs Series 2002-1:
		Class A1				72,994			236,694		LIBOR + 0.26%	June 2004(6)
		Class A2				381,296			381,296		LIBOR + 0.38%	December 2009(6)
		Class B				39,955			39,955		LIBOR + 0.65%	April 2011(6)
		Class C				26,637			26,637		LIBOR + 0.75%	May 2011(6)
		Class D				21,310			21,310		LIBOR + 0.85%	January 2012(6)
		Class E				42,619			42,619		LIBOR + 1.235%	January 2012(6)
		Class F				26,637			26,637		LIBOR + 1.335%	January 2012(6)
		Class G				21,309			21,309		LIBOR + 1.435%	January 2012(6)
		Class H				26,637			26,637		6.35%	January 2012(6)
		Class J				26,637			26,637		6.35%	May 2012(6)
		Class K				26,637			26,637		6.35%	May 2012(6)

		Total iStar Asset Receivables secured notes				712,668			876,368
		Less: debt discount				(4,219	)		(4,425	)
	STARs Series 2003-1:
		Class A1				249,273			—		LIBOR + 0.25%	October 28, 2005(7)
		Class A2				248,206			—		LIBOR +0.35%	August 28, 2010(7)
		Class B				18,452			—		LIBOR + 0.55%	July 28, 2011(7)
		Class C				20,297			—		LIBOR + 0.65%	April 28, 2012(7)
		Class D				12,916			—		LIBOR + 0.75%	October 28, 2012(7)
		Class E				14,762			—		LIBOR + 1.05%	May 28, 2013(7)
		Class F				14,762			—		LIBOR + 1.10%	June 28, 2013(7)
		Class G				12,916			—		LIBOR + 1.25%	June 28, 2013(7)
		Class H				12,916			—		4.97%	June 28, 2013(7)
		Class J				14,761			—		5.07%	June 28, 2013(7)
		Class K				25,833			—		5.56%	June 28, 2013(7)

		Total iStar Asset Receivables secured notes				1,353,543			871,943
Unsecured notes:
	7.00% Senior Notes(8)(9)					185,000			—		7.00%	March 2008
	6.75% Dealer Remarketable Securities(8)(9)(10)					—			125,000		6.75%	March 2013
	7.70% Notes(8)(10)					100,000			100,000		7.70%	July 2017
	7.95% Notes(8)(10)					50,000			50,000		7.95%	May 2006
	8.75% Notes					350,000			350,000		8.75%	August 2008

	Total unsecured notes					685,000			625,000
	Less: debt discount					(37,585	)		(11,603	)
	Plus: impact of pay-floating swap agreements(11)					9,203			3,920

	Total unsecured notes					656,618			617,317
Other debt obligations						40,687			15,961		Various	Various

Total debt obligations					$	3,842,856		$	3,461,590

Type of Hedge	Notional Amount	Strike Price or Swap Rate		Trade Date		Maturity Date	Estimated Value at June 30, 2003
Pay-Fixed Swap	75,000	5.580	%	11/4/99	(1)	12/1/04	$	(4,935	)
Pay-Fixed Swap	125,000	2.885	%	1/23/03		6/25/06		(3,759	)
Pay-Fixed Swap	125,000	2.838	%	2/11/03		6/25/06		(3,583	)
Pay-Floating Swap	100,000	3.878	%	11/27/02		8/15/08		6,280
Pay-Floating Swap	50,000	3.810	%	11/27/02		8/15/08		2,964
LIBOR Cap	345,000	8.000	%	5/22/02		5/28/14		9,066
LIBOR Cap	75,000	7.750	%	11/4/99	(1)	12/1/04		—
LIBOR Cap	35,000	7.750	%	11/4/99	(1)	12/1/04		—

Total Estimated Value							$	6,033

		Number of Shares
		Employees		Non-Employee Directors		Other		Average Strike Price
Options outstanding, December 31, 2002		3,277,142		191,129		871,480		$	18.77
	Granted in 2003	15,500		—		—		$	14.72
	Excercised in 2003	(549,030	)	(85,202	)	(168,897	)	$	18.39
	Forfieted in 2003	(6,367	)	—		—		$	30.43

Options outstanding, June 30, 2003		2,737,245		105,927		702,583		$	18.81

	As of June 30, 2003			As of December 31, 2002
Unrealized gains on available-for-sale investments	$	26,921		$	13,290
Unrealized losses on cash flow hedges		(17,790	)		(15,591	)

Accumulated other comprehensive income (losses)	$	9,131		$	(2,301	)

	Real Estate Lending		Corporate Tenant Leasing		Corporate/ Other(1)			Company Total
	(In thousands) (unaudited)
Three months ended June 30, 2003:
Total revenues(2):	$	81,624	$	67,741	$	125		$	149,490
Equity in earnings from joint ventures and unconcolidated subsidiaries:		—		1,078		(1,178	)		(100	)
Total operating and interest expense(3):		23,999		31,408		24,047			79,454
Net operating income(4):		57,625		37,411		(25,100	)		69,936
Three months ended June 30, 2002:
Total revenues(2):	$	71,849	$	58,792	$	150		$	130,791
Equity in earnings from joint ventures and unconcolidated subsidiaries:		—		1,421		(1,003	)		418
Total operating and interest expense(3):		37,695		24,131		28,748			90,574
Net operating income(4):		34,154		36,082		(29,601	)		40,635
Six months ended June 30, 2003:
Total revenues(2):	$	158,520	$	133,574	$	676		$	292,770
Equity in earnings from joint ventures and unconcolidated subsidiaries:		—		2,094		(2,252	)		(158	)
Total operating and interest expense(3):		46,946		62,404		45,470			154,820
Net operating income(4):		111,574		73,264		(47,046	)		137,792
Six months ended June 30, 2002:
Total revenues(2):	$	135,716	$	114,876	$	(226	)	$	250,366
Equity in earnings from joint ventures and unconcolidated subsidiaries:		—		3,209		(1,993	)		1,216
Total operating and interest expense(3):		59,271		46,012		49,864			155,147
Net operating income(4):		76,445		72,073		(52,083	)		96,435
As of June 30, 2003:
Total long-lived assets(5):		3,409,989		2,332,499		N/A			5,742,488
Total assets:		3,525,873		2,490,345		109,046			6,125,264
As of December 31, 2002:
Total long-lived assets(5):		3,050,342		2,291,805		N/A			5,342,147
Total assets:		3,126,219		2,442,087		43,391			5,611,697

				Principal Payments Due By Period(1)
		Total		Less Than 1 Year		2-3 Years		4-5 Years		6-10 Years		After 10 Years
		(In thousands)
Long-Term Debt Obligations:
Secured revolving credit facilities		$	1,113,164	$	—	$	545,971	$	567,193	$	—	$	—
Unsecured revolving credit facilities			—		—		—		—		—		—
Secured term loans			678,996		110,000		81,519		195,915		239,349		52,213
iStar Asset Receivables secured notes(2)			1,357,763		72,994		249,273		—		1,035,496		—
Unsecured notes			685,000		—		50,000		185,000		350,000		100,000
Other debt obligations			40,687		40,687		—		—		—		—

	Total		3,875,610		223,681		926,763		948,108		1,624,845		152,213
Operating Lease Obligations:(3)			17,608		2,908		5,467		5,353		3,880		—

	Total	$	3,893,218	$	226,589	$	932,230	$	953,461	$	1,628,725	$	152,213

		iSTAR FINANCIAL INC. Registrant
Date: August 14, 2003		/s/ JAY SUGARMAN Jay Sugarman Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer
Date: August 14, 2003		/s/ CATHERINE D. RICE Catherine D. Rice Chief Financial Officer