SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One) | |
ý |
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 |
|
or |
|
o |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to |
|
Commission File No. 0-692 |
Delaware | 46-0172280 | |
(State of Incorporation) | IRS Employer Identification No. | |
125 South Dakota Avenue Sioux Falls, South Dakota 57104 (Address of principal office) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer. Yes ý No o
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:
Common
Stock, Par Value $1.75
37,680,095 outstanding at August 14, 2003
NORTHWESTERN CORPORATION
FORM 10-Q
INDEX
|
|
Page |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS | 3 | |||
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
6 |
|||
Item 1. |
Financial Statements (Unaudited) |
6 |
||
Consolidated Balance SheetsJune 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002 |
6 |
|||
Consolidated Statements of LossThree and six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 |
7 |
|||
Consolidated Statements of Cash FlowsSix months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 |
8 |
|||
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
9 |
|||
Item 2. |
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
29 |
||
Item 3. |
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk |
55 |
||
Item 4. |
Controls and Procedures |
56 |
||
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION |
58 |
|||
Item 1. |
Legal Proceedings |
58 |
||
Item 5. |
Other Information |
60 |
||
Item 6. |
Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K |
60 |
||
SIGNATURES |
62 |
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
On one or more occasions, we may make statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q regarding our assumptions, projections, expectations, targets, intentions or beliefs about future events. All statements other than statements of historical facts, included or incorporated by reference herein relating to management's current expectations of future financial performance, continued growth, changes in economic conditions or capital markets and changes in customer usage patterns and preferences are forward looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Words or phrases such as "anticipates," "believes," "estimates," "expects," "intends," "plans," "predicts," "projects," "targets," "will likely result," "will continue" or similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results or outcomes to differ materially from those expressed. We caution that while we make such statements in good faith and we believe such statements are based on reasonable assumptions, including without limitation, management's examination of historical operating trends, data contained in records and other data available from third parties, we cannot assure you that our projections will be achieved. Factors that may cause such differences include but are not limited to:
3
restatement of our 2002 quarterly financial statements, our liquidity and financial condition will be materially adversely affected;
We have attempted to identify, in context, certain of the factors that we believe may cause actual future experience and results to differ materially from our current expectation regarding the relevant matter or subject area. In addition to the items specifically discussed above, our business and results of operations are subject to the uncertainties described under the caption "Risk Factors" which is a part of the disclosure included in Item 2 of this Report entitled "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations."
From time to time, oral or written forward-looking statements are also included in our reports on Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K, Proxy Statements on Schedule 14A, press releases and other materials released to the public. Although we believe that at the time made, the expectations reflected in all of these forward-looking statements are and will be reasonable, any or all of the forward-looking statements in this report on Form 10-Q, our reports on Forms 10-K and 8-K, our Proxy Statements on Schedule 14A and any other public statements that are made by us may prove to be incorrect. This may occur as a result of inaccurate assumptions or as a consequence of known or unknown risks and uncertainties. Many factors discussed in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, certain of which are
4
beyond our control, will be important in determining our future performance. Consequently, actual results may differ materially from those that might be anticipated from forward-looking statements. In light of these and other uncertainties, you should not regard the inclusion of a forward-looking statement in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or other public communications that we might make as a representation by us that our plans and objectives will be achieved, and you should not place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements.
We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. However, your attention is directed to any further disclosures made on related subjects in our subsequent annual and periodic reports filed with the Commission on Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K and Proxy Statements on Schedule 14A.
Unless the context requires otherwise, references to "we," "us," "our," "NorthWestern Corporation" and "NorthWestern" refer specifically to NorthWestern Corporation and its subsidiaries.
5
NORTHWESTERN CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
June 30, 2003 |
December 31, 2002 |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASSETS | |||||||||
Current Assets: | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 50,489 | $ | 26,554 | |||||
Restricted cash | 55,734 | 28,039 | |||||||
Accounts receivable, net | 105,215 | 118,005 | |||||||
Inventories | 26,733 | 25,907 | |||||||
Regulatory assets | 14,600 | 15,430 | |||||||
Other | 49,247 | 32,873 | |||||||
Assets held for sale | 30,000 | 42,665 | |||||||
Current assets of discontinued operations | 245,082 | 275,549 | |||||||
Total current assets | 577,100 | 565,022 | |||||||
Property, Plant, and Equipment, Net | 1,234,512 | 1,238,050 | |||||||
Goodwill | 375,798 | 375,798 | |||||||
Other: | |||||||||
Investments | 32,092 | 85,236 | |||||||
Regulatory assets | 197,754 | 201,075 | |||||||
Other | 68,073 | 51,438 | |||||||
Noncurrent assets of discontinued operations | 139,557 | 164,970 | |||||||
Total assets | $ | 2,624,886 | $ | 2,681,589 | |||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICIT |
|||||||||
Current Liabilities: | |||||||||
Current maturities of long-term debt | $ | 1,260,655 | $ | 25,909 | |||||
Accounts payable | 47,644 | 49,704 | |||||||
Accrued expenses | 143,516 | 162,524 | |||||||
Regulatory liabilities | 6,751 | 32,236 | |||||||
Current liabilities of discontinued operations | 236,572 | 243,551 | |||||||
Total current liabilities | 1,695,138 | 513,924 | |||||||
Long-term Debt | 526,555 | 1,642,522 | |||||||
Deferred Income Taxes | | 202 | |||||||
Noncurrent Regulatory Liabilities | 33,847 | 35,002 | |||||||
Other Noncurrent Liabilities | 467,661 | 492,263 | |||||||
Noncurrent Liabilities and Minority Interests of Discontinued Operations | 35,377 | 83,003 | |||||||
Total liabilities | 2,758,578 | 2,766,916 | |||||||
Minority Interests |
|
500 |
|||||||
Company Obligated Mandatorily Redeemable Preferred Securities of Subsidiary Trusts | 370,250 | 370,250 | |||||||
Shareholders' Deficit: | |||||||||
Common stock, par value $1.75; authorized 50,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 37,680,095 and 37,396,762 | 65,940 | 65,444 | |||||||
Paid-in capital | 301,173 | 304,781 | |||||||
Treasury stock, at cost | | (3,560 | ) | ||||||
Retained deficit | (866,495 | ) | (818,605 | ) | |||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (4,560 | ) | (4,137 | ) | |||||
Total shareholders' deficit | (503,942 | ) | (456,077 | ) | |||||
Total liabilities and shareholders' deficit | $ | 2,624,886 | $ | 2,681,589 | |||||
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.
6
NORTHWESTERN CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF LOSS
(Unaudited)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
Three Months Ended June 30 |
Six Months Ended June 30 |
||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2003 |
2002 |
2003 |
2002 |
||||||||||
OPERATING REVENUES | $ | 235,529 | $ | 177,441 | $ | 524,252 | $ | 353,507 | ||||||
COST OF SALES | 129,298 | 69,081 | 284,457 | 150,398 | ||||||||||
GROSS MARGIN | 106,231 | 108,360 | 239,795 | 203,109 | ||||||||||
OPERATING EXPENSES | ||||||||||||||
Operating, general and administrative | 75,058 | 64,093 | 148,173 | 107,638 | ||||||||||
Impairment on assets held for sale | 12,399 | | 12,399 | | ||||||||||
Depreciation | 17,432 | 16,636 | 34,855 | 29,675 | ||||||||||
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES | 104,889 | 80,729 | 195,427 | 137,313 | ||||||||||
OPERATING INCOME | 1,342 | 27,631 | 44,368 | 65,796 | ||||||||||
Interest Expense | (39,584 | ) | (28,373 | ) | (81,181 | ) | (49,184 | ) | ||||||
Loss on Debt Extinguishment | | | | (20,688 | ) | |||||||||
Investment Income and Other | 1,380 | (2,656 | ) | 1,155 | (1,977 | ) | ||||||||
Loss From Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes | (36,862 | ) | (3,398 | ) | (35,658 | ) | (6,053 | ) | ||||||
Benefit (Provision) for Income Taxes | (464 | ) | 4,473 | (501 | ) | 5,781 | ||||||||
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations | (37,326 | ) | 1,075 | (36,159 | ) | (272 | ) | |||||||
Discontinued Operations, Net of Taxes and Minority Interests | (13,011 | ) | (14,968 | ) | 3,214 | (59,751 | ) | |||||||
Net Loss | (50,337 | ) | (13,893 | ) | (32,945 | ) | (60,023 | ) | ||||||
Minority Interests on Preferred Securities of Subsidiary Trusts | (7,472 | ) | (7,474 | ) | (14,945 | ) | (13,699 | ) | ||||||
Dividends on Preferred Stock | | (48 | ) | | (96 | ) | ||||||||
Loss on Common Stock | $ | (57,809 | ) | $ | (21,415 | ) | $ | (47,890 | ) | $ | (73,818 | ) | ||
Average Common Shares Outstanding | 37,397 | 27,397 | 37,397 | 27,397 | ||||||||||
Earnings (Loss) per Average Common Share: | ||||||||||||||
Continuing operations | $ | (1.20 | ) | $ | (0.24 | ) | $ | (1.37 | ) | $ | (0.51 | ) | ||
Discontinued operations | (0.35 | ) | (0.55 | ) | 0.09 | (2.18 | ) | |||||||
Basic | $ | (1.55 | ) | $ | (0.79 | ) | $ | (1.28 | ) | $ | (2.69 | ) | ||
Diluted Earnings (Loss) per Average Common Share: | ||||||||||||||
Continuing operations | $ | (1.20 | ) | $ | (0.24 | ) | $ | (1.37 | ) | $ | (0.51 | ) | ||
Discontinued operations | (0.35 | ) | (0.55 | ) | 0.09 | (2.18 | ) | |||||||
Diluted | $ | (1.55 | ) | $ | (0.79 | ) | $ | (1.28 | ) | $ | (2.69 | ) | ||
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.
7
NORTHWESTERN CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(in thousands)
|
Six Months Ended June 30 |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2003 |
2002 |
||||||||
Operating Activities: | ||||||||||
Net Loss | $ | (32,945 | ) | $ | (60,023 | ) | ||||
Items not affecting cash: | ||||||||||
Depreciation | 34,855 | 29,675 | ||||||||
(Gain) Loss on discontinued operations | (3,214 | ) | 59,751 | |||||||
Loss on debt extinguishment | | 20,688 | ||||||||
Deferred income taxes | (202 | ) | 2,847 | |||||||
Impairment on assets held for sale | 12,399 | - | ||||||||
Changes in current assets and liabilities: | ||||||||||
Restricted cash | (27,695 | ) | (39,425 | ) | ||||||
Accounts receivable | 12,790 | 23,440 | ||||||||
Inventories | (826 | ) | 14,965 | |||||||
Other current assets | (16,374 | ) | 17,861 | |||||||
Accounts payable | (2,060 | ) | (30,985 | ) | ||||||
Accrued expenses | (25,173 | ) | 63,569 | |||||||
Change in regulatory assets | 4,151 | 3,377 | ||||||||
Change in regulatory liabilities | (26,640 | ) | (15,252 | ) | ||||||
Other, net | (15,388 | ) | 16,296 | |||||||
Cash flows provided by (used in) continuing operations | (86,322 | ) | 106,784 | |||||||
Change in net assets of discontinued operations | (3,511 | ) | (179,382 | ) | ||||||
Cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities | (89,833 | ) | (72,598 | ) | ||||||
Investment Activities: | ||||||||||
Property, plant and equipment additions | (31,826 | ) | (39,605 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from sale of assets | 775 | | ||||||||
Purchase of investments | (42,648 | ) | (12,641 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from sale of investments | 94,654 | | ||||||||
Acquisitions, net of cash received | | (502,765 | ) | |||||||
Proceeds from sale of discontinued operation | 6,600 | | ||||||||
Cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities | 27,555 | (555,011 | ) | |||||||
Financing Activities: | ||||||||||
Dividends on common and preferred stock | | (17,492 | ) | |||||||
Minority interest on preferred securities of subsidiary trusts | (7,473 | ) | (13,699 | ) | ||||||
Issuance of long-term debt | 394,853 | 719,118 | ||||||||
Issuance of preferred securities of subsidiary trusts | | 117,750 | ||||||||
Repayment of long-term debt | (21,249 | ) | (2,009 | ) | ||||||
Line of credit (repayments) borrowings, net | (255,000 | ) | (132,000 | ) | ||||||
Financing costs | (24,918 | ) | (34,194 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from termination of hedge | | 7,878 | ||||||||
Cash flows provided by financing activities | 86,213 | 645,352 | ||||||||
Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents | 23,935 | 17,743 | ||||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents, beginning of period | 26,554 | 7,329 | ||||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents, end of period | $ | 50,489 | $ | 25,072 | ||||||
Supplemental Cash Flow Information: | ||||||||||
Cash paid (received) during the period for: | ||||||||||
Income Taxes | $ | 7,535 | $ | (5,846 | ) | |||||
Interest | 71,445 | 32,542 | ||||||||
Non-cash transactions: | ||||||||||
Debt and preferred securities of subsidiary trusts assumed in acquisition | $ | | $ | 511,104 | ||||||
Fair value of note receivable received in exchange for discontinued operation | 1,400 | | ||||||||
Assets acquired in exchange for debt | | 350 | ||||||||
Discount on subordinated note | | 1,467 |
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.
8
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Reference is made to Notes to Financial Statements
included in NorthWestern Corporation's Annual Report)
(1) Management's Statement
The consolidated financial statements for the interim periods included herein have been prepared by NorthWestern Corporation (the "Corporation" or "we"), without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that may affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year, and these financial statements do not contain the detail or footnote disclosure concerning accounting policies and other matters that would be included in full fiscal year financial statements. Therefore, these financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.
(2) Nature of Operations and Recent Developments
We are one of the largest providers of electricity and natural gas in the Upper Midwest and Northwest, serving approximately 598,000 customers in Montana, South Dakota and Nebraska. We have generated and distributed electricity in South Dakota and distributed natural gas in South Dakota and Nebraska since 1923 through our energy division, NorthWestern Energy, formerly NorthWestern Public Service. On February 15, 2002, we completed the acquisition of the electric and natural gas transmission and distribution business of The Montana Power Company, or Montana Power. As a result of the acquisition, from February 15, 2002 through November 15, 2002, we distributed electricity and natural gas in Montana through our wholly owned subsidiary, NorthWestern Energy, L.L.C. Effective November 15, 2002, we transferred the electric and natural gas transmission and distribution operations of NorthWestern Energy, L.L.C. to NorthWestern Corporation, and since that date, we have operated its business as part of our NorthWestern Energy division. We are operating our utility business under the common name "NorthWestern Energy" in all our service territories. The former NorthWestern Energy, L.L.C. has been renamed "Clark Fork and Blackfoot, L.L.C."
We also have made investments in three primary non-energy businesses: Expanets, Inc., or Expanets, a provider of networked communications and data services and solutions to small to mid-sized businesses nationwide; Blue Dot Services Inc., or Blue Dot, a nationwide provider of air conditioning, heating, plumbing and related services; and, through November 1, 2002, we held an economic equity interest in a subsidiary that serves as the managing general partner of CornerStone Propane Partners, L.P., or CornerStone, a publicly traded limited partnership that is a retail propane and wholesale energy related commodities distributor. The operations of Expanets, Blue Dot and CornerStone and our interest in these subsidiaries have been reflected in the consolidated financial statements as Discontinued Operations (see Note 6 for further discussion).
Our financial condition has been significantly and negatively affected by the poor performance of our non-energy businesses and our significant indebtedness. If we are unable to address our significant and immediate liquidity challenges and effectively implement our turnaround plan, which will require significantly reducing our debt and generating cash from additional funding sources or proceeds from the sale of non-core assets, then we will not have sufficient working capital to continue to fund our
9
operations or service our substantial indebtedness and we may be required to seek protection under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code:
In order to address the Corporation's financial problems, we have developed a turnaround plan, the key elements of which are to: (i) focus on our core electric and natural gas utility businesses; (ii) substantially reduce debt by applying net proceeds from the sale of non-core assets and other means; (iii) reduce operating costs; and (iv) improve internal financial controls and procedures.
We have eliminated the dividend on our common stock, which represented approximately $38 million in distributions in 2002, and elected to defer distributions on the publicly traded trust preferred securities of our subsidiary trusts. We do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock for the foreseeable future. In addition, we are currently prohibited from paying dividends on our common stock under Delaware law. Our senior secured term loan also prohibits the payment of dividends during any period of default under the agreement. We currently are not in default under our senior secured term loan. To the extent that payment of a cash dividend on our
10
common stock becomes permissible under Delaware law, we would only be able to pay a cash dividend on our common stock to the extent that all required distributions (including any deferred amounts) on the publicly traded trust preferred securities of our subsidiary trusts have been made.
We have engaged a financial adviser to assist us in effecting the sale of Blue Dot and Expanets. With our financial advisor we are conducting a private auction with respect to Blue Dot and are seeking to exit this business. Although we hope to conclude our disposition of Blue Dot in 2003, we do not anticipate receiving a material amount of net cash proceeds in excess of liabilities from that transaction. We are also seeking to sell Expanets. We are attempting to conclude this transaction during 2003. If we are successful in consummating the sale of Expanets, we hope to receive net cash proceeds significantly in excess of liabilities to third parties. Any final arrangement relating to the sale of Blue Dot or Expanets is subject to numerous legal, accounting, financial and business issues being resolved. We will not make any additional investments in, or commitments to, Expanets and Blue Dot. In addition, in January 2003, the MPSC restricted our ability to make additional investments or commitments to our non-regulated businesses to $10 million in the aggregate unless we obtain its prior approval.
We are also attempting to sell other non-core assets, including the Montana First Megawatts generation project, and we are seeking to enforce an existing contract to sell certain Colstrip transmission assets to a third party. During the second quarter of 2003, we consummated the sale of one non-core business for cash consideration of $6.6 million and a note receivable of $4.7 million (see Note 6 for further discussion).
We face considerable challenges in selling our non-energy businesses, which have historically not been cash flow contributors to the organization. Expanets faces challenges with respect to, among other things, economic conditions in the telecommunications market and problems with its Expert system, an enterprise information technology and management system. Expanets may not have sufficient working capital to satisfy its debt obligations as they mature or in the event of an acceleration of all or a significant portion of its outstanding indebtedness. Blue Dot faces serious liquidity concerns in the near term as it seeks to extend its forbearance agreement with its credit facility provider, obtain favorable payment terms related to its upcoming insurance renewals and meet other cash payment obligations as they become due. If we are unable to dispose of Blue Dot within the next three months, we may incur additional claims related to amounts we have guaranteed on behalf of Blue Dot. Each company also faces challenges related to retention of its employees, key managers, customers and suppliers. The challenges faced by Expanets and Blue Dot have caused serious disruption to these businesses and have materially and adversely affected their value. We cannot predict whether or when such assets may be sold, or whether we can obtain a favorable price or other terms in any such sale.
In addition to the sale of non-core assets and other steps we have taken and intend to take to improve operating performance and preserve cash, we believe that reduction of debt will require the issuance of additional equity securities, either to raise cash or to exchange for the retirement of outstanding debt. We are asking that our stockholders approve, at our annual meeting scheduled for August 26, 2003, a significant increase in the authorized number of shares of common stock, a significant increase in the number of shares of preferred stock and a significant amendment of preferred stock terms, together with other changes to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation, in order to provide us with greater flexibility in pursuing our turnaround plan. We believe that unless a new Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation is adopted we will not be able to effectuate our turnaround plan. In addition, if our common shares are delisted from the NYSE, raising capital in the future or using our shares to extinguish all or part of our debt would be significantly more difficult.
We have retained a financial restructuring advisory firm to assist us in implementing our turnaround plan. If we are unable to effectuate our turnaround plan, which will require significantly reducing our debt, restructuring our debt and obtaining additional capital, we will not be able to fund
11
our operations and service our substantial indebtedness and we may default on certain covenants under instruments governing our indebtedness, including our credit agreement. If those events were to occur we may be required to pursue alternate means of resolving our financial problems, which could include seeking protection under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, thus creating substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.
The Montana Consumer Counsel (MCC) has filed with the MPSC a Petition for Investigation, Adoption of Additional Regulatory Controls and Related Relief. The relief sought includes adoption of new regulatory controls that would specifically apply to NorthWestern, including additional reporting, cost allocation and financing rules and requirements, and examination of affiliate transactions. We cannot determine the impact or resolution of this petition, however, any action taken by the MPSC to increase the regulatory controls under which we operate may have a material affect on our liquidity, operations and financial condition. Any new MPSC orders related to our financing activities may make it more difficult to restructure our debt in connection with our turnaround plan. Also, if we are unable to comply with any MPSC orders in a timely manner, we may become subject to material monetary penalties and fines.
(3) Basis of Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include our accounts together with those of our wholly and majority-owned or controlled subsidiaries. The financial statements of Expanets, Blue Dot and CornerStone (CornerStone is only through November 1, 2002) are included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements by virtue of the voting and control rights, and therefore included in references to "subsidiaries". All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated from the consolidated financial statements. The operations of Expanets, Blue Dot and CornerStone and our interest in these subsidiaries have been reflected in the consolidated financial statements as Discontinued Operations (see Note 6 for further discussion).
(4) Acquisition
On February 15, 2002, we completed the asset acquisition of Montana Power's energy transmission and distribution business for $478.0 million in cash and the assumption of $511.1 million in existing debt and mandatorily redeemable preferred securities of subsidiary trusts (net of cash received). Acquisition costs were approximately $24.8 million. We completed this acquisition to expand our presence in the energy market. As a result of the acquisition, we are now a provider of natural gas and electricity to approximately 598,000 customers in Montana, South Dakota and Nebraska. Results of our Montana operations have been included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements since the effective date of the acquisition.
The following unaudited pro forma results of consolidated operations for the six months ended June 30, 2002, give effect as if the acquisition had occurred as of January 1, 2002 (in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2002 |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revenues | $ | 417,470 | ||
Net Loss | (50,804 | ) | ||
Diluted loss per share | (2.37 | ) |
The pro forma results are not necessarily indicative of what actually would have occurred if the acquisition had been completed as of the beginning of the period, nor are they necessarily indicative of future consolidated results.
12
(5) Goodwill
A summary of changes in our goodwill for the six months ended June 30, 2003 by business segment, is as follows (in thousands):
|
Electric and Natural Gas |
||
---|---|---|---|
Balance as of December 31, 2002 | $ | 375,798 | |
Goodwill acquired | | ||
Balance as of June 30, 2003 | $ | 375,798 | |
(6) Discontinued Operations
During the second quarter of 2003, we committed to a plan to sell our interest in Expanets and Blue Dot. In accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, we are required to classify the results of operations of Expanets and Blue Dot as discontinued operations because we anticipate selling both Expanets and Blue Dot within the next twelve months.
Summary financial information for the discontinued Expanets operations is as follows (in thousands):
|
June 30, 2003 |
December 31, 2002 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Accounts receivable, net | $ | 83,413 | $ | 101,990 | ||
Other current assets | 75,376 | 72,170 | ||||
Current assets of discontinued operations | $ | 158,789 | $ | 174,160 | ||
Other noncurrent assets of discontinued operations | $ | 138,607 | $ | 155,781 | ||
Accounts payable | $ | 41,693 | $ | 34,735 | ||
Other current liabilities | 117,510 | 125,066 | ||||
Current liabilities of discontinued operations | $ | 159,203 | $ | 159,801 | ||
Other noncurrent liabilities of discontinued operations | $ | 27,095 | $ | 71,971 | ||
|
Three months ended |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
June 30, 2003 |
June 30, 2002 |
|||||
Revenues | $ | 162,061 | $ | 191,354 | |||
Loss from operations before income taxes and minority interests | (6,765 | ) | (18,580 | ) | |||
Minority interests | | | |||||
Income tax benefit (provision) | (113 | ) | 7,426 | ||||
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes and minority interests | $ | (6,878 | ) | $ | (11,154 | ) | |
13
|
Six months ended |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
June 30, 2003 |
June 30, 2002 |
|||||
Revenues | $ | 328,667 | $ | 370,642 | |||
Income (Loss) from operations before income taxes and minority interests | 14,355 | (45,754 | ) | ||||
Minority interests | | 11,152 | |||||
Income tax benefit (provision) | (253 | ) | 17,571 | ||||
Income (Loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes and minority interests | $ | 14,102 | $ | (17,031 | ) | ||
Expanets' income from operations before income taxes and minority interests for the six months ended June 30, 2003 includes a gain on debt extinguishment of $27.3 million.
Summary financial information for the discontinued Blue Dot operations is as follows (in thousands). The operating results for the three and six months ending June 30, 2003 reflect the results of operations of 18 sold locations through the date of sale:
|
June 30, 2003 |
December 31, 2002 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Accounts receivable, net | $ | 53,223 | $ | 56,393 | ||
Other current assets | 32,701 | 36,668 | ||||
Current assets of discontinued operations | $ | 85,924 | $ | 93,061 | ||
Other noncurrent assets of discontinued operations | $ | 950 | $ | 185 | ||
Accounts payable | $ | 22,657 | $ | 18,945 | ||
Other current liabilities | 54,024 | 61,266 | ||||
Current liabilities of discontinued operations | $ | 76,681 | $ | 80,211 | ||
Other noncurrent liabilities of discontinued operations | $ | 8,282 | $ | 10,611 | ||
|
Three months ended |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
June 30, 2003 |
June 30, 2002 |
|||||
Revenues | $ | 115,046 | $ | 117,775 | |||
Income from operations before income taxes and minority interests | 2,882 | 1,417 | |||||
Minority interests | | | |||||
Income tax provision | (296 | ) | (580 | ) | |||
Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes | $ | 2,586 | $ | 837 | |||
|
Six months ended |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
June 30, 2003 |
June 30, 2002 |
|||||
Revenues | $ | 226,241 | $ | 212,258 | |||
Loss from operations before income taxes and minority interests | (1,366 | ) | (2,737 | ) | |||
Minority interests | | 3,762 | |||||
Income tax benefit (provision) | (591 | ) | 916 | ||||
Income (Loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes | $ | (1,957 | ) | $ | 1,941 | ||
14
During the second quarter of 2003, we also sold, or committed to sell, our interest in two other subsidiaries. The sale of One Call Locators, Ltd., was completed in June for consideration of $6.6 million in cash and a note receivable of $4.7 million. The acquiring entity may elect to prepay the note receivable within one year by presenting unsecured bonds or trust preferred obligated securities of NorthWestern, which will be accepted at face value. We recorded the carrying value of the note receivable based on the fair value of our trust preferred securities at the date of the transaction and we recognized a loss of approximately $3.4 million on this sale. We sold assets of the other subsidiary in July for $0.2 million in cash and a note receivable of $0.3 million. We recognized a loss of approximately $2.2 million on this sale. We have classified the results of these subsidiaries and CornerStone Propane Partners, L.P. (see discussion below) in discontinued operations and summary financial information is as follows (in thousands):
|
June 30, 2003 |
December 31, 2002 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Accounts receivable, net | $ | 369 | $ | 5,059 | ||
Other current assets | | 3,269 | ||||
Current assets of discontinued operations | $ | 369 | $ | 8,328 | ||
Other noncurrent assets | $ | | $ | 9,004 | ||
Accounts payable | $ | | $ | 609 | ||
Other current liabilities | 688 | 2,930 | ||||
Current liabilities of discontinued operations | $ | 688 | $ | 3,539 | ||
Noncurrent liabilities of discontinued operations | $ | | $ | 421 | ||
|
Three months ended |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
June 30, 2003 |
June 30, 2002 |
|||||
Revenues | $ | 11,727 | $ | 72,612 | |||
Income (Loss) from operations before income taxes and minority interests | 45 | (24,455 | ) | ||||
Loss on disposal | (5,624 | ) | | ||||
Income tax benefit (provision) | (3,140 | ) | 2,118 | ||||
Income (Loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes and minority interests | $ | (8,719 | ) | $ | (4,651 | ) | |
|
Six months ended |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
June 30, 2003 |
June 30, 2002 |
|||||
Revenues | $ | 19,493 | $ | 356,142 | |||
Income (Loss) from operations before income taxes and minority interests | 417 | (14,016 | ) | ||||
Loss on disposal | (5,624 | ) | (40,000 | ) | |||
Income tax benefit (provision) | (3,724 | ) | 762 | ||||
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes and minority interests | $ | (8,931 | ) | $ | (44,661 | ) | |
Effective November 1, 2002, we relinquished our direct and indirect equity interests in CornerStone Propane Partners, L.P. and CornerStone Propane, L.P. We do however own a
15
non-economic voting interest in a limited liability company, which owns 100 percent of the stock of the managing general partner of CornerStone. As a result, the assets and liabilities of CornerStone are no longer included in our Consolidated Balance Sheets subsequent to November 1, 2002. Effective November 1, 2002, we no longer reflect the results of CornerStone's operations in the Consolidated Income Statements. The results for CornerStone's operations and impairments related to our investments in and advances to CornerStone for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, have been presented as discontinued operations in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss).
On August 20, 2002, NorthWestern purchased the lenders' interest in approximately $19.9 million of CornerStone short-term debt outstanding under CornerStone's credit facility together with approximately $6.1 million in letters of credit, which NorthWestern had previously guaranteed. No further drawings may be made under this facility. In addition, NorthWestern is owed $13.5 million from CornerStone and NorthWestern also has $9.2 million in letters of credit outstanding on behalf of CornerStone. As of June 30, 2003, the net recorded value of our receivables from and letters of credit exposure related to CornerStone was an aggregate $21.1 million.
(7) Regulatory Matters
On June 2, 2003, we filed an annual gas cost tracker request with the MPSC for the projected gas costs for the twelve-month period ending June 30, 2004.
On July 3, 2003, the MPSC issued a final order disallowing our estimated recovery of $6.2 million of natural gas costs we incurred during the past eight months. The MPSC also rejected a motion for reconsideration filed by us. We filed suit in district court on July 28, 2003 seeking to overturn the MPSC's decision to disallow recovery of these costs. Included in other current assets was $6.2 million, which was written off during June to comply with the final order. In the event the MPSC's decision is overturned, we will reinstate the asset.
The MPSC also granted an interim order on July 3, 2003 for the projected gas cost adjusted for a portion of the gas portfolio at a fixed price of $3.50 per MMbtu as opposed to the market price submitted in the original filing, which was higher. Assuming our average forecast price over the next twelve months occurs, the impact of this disallowance on the volumes at the imputed price compared to market price would be approximately $6 million for the period July 1, 2003, through June 30, 2004.
In Nebraska, where natural gas companies have been regulated by the municipalities in which they serve, the 2003 Nebraska Unicameral Legislature enacted a new law during the second quarter of 2003, shifting the regulation to the Nebraska Public Service Commission (NPSC). Under the new law, the NPSC regulates rates and terms and conditions of service for natural gas companies, however, the law provides that a natural gas company and the cities in which it serves have the ability to negotiate rates for natural gas service when the natural gas company files an application for increased rates. If the cities and the company choose not to negotiate or they are unable to reach an agreement, the NPSC will review the rate filing.
(8) Other Comprehensive Loss
The Financial Accounting Standards Board defines comprehensive income as all changes to the equity of a business enterprise during a period, except for those resulting from transactions with owners. For example, dividend distributions are excepted. Comprehensive income consists of net income and other comprehensive income. Net income may include such items as income from continuing operations, discontinued operations, extraordinary items, and cumulative effects of changes in accounting principles. Other comprehensive income may include foreign currency translations,
16
adjustments of minimum pension liability, and unrealized gains and losses on certain investments in debt and equity securities. Comprehensive income (loss) is calculated as follows (in thousands):
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2003 |
2002 |
2003 |
2002 |
||||||||||
Net loss | $ | (50,337 | ) | $ | (13,893 | ) | $ | (32,945 | ) | $ | (60,023 | ) | ||
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax: | ||||||||||||||
Unrealized gain (loss) on investments | 30 | 365 | (349 | ) | 390 | |||||||||
Gain on termination of hedge | | | | 5,121 | ||||||||||
Amortization of hedge gain | (166 | ) | (160 | ) | (279 | ) | (209 | ) | ||||||
Foreign currency translation | 115 | 58 | 206 | 54 | ||||||||||
Comprehensive loss | $ | (50,358 | ) | $ | (13,630 | ) | $ | (33,367 | ) | $ | (54,667 | ) | ||
(9) Restructuring Reserve
We recognized a restructuring charge in the fourth quarter of 2001 related to certain cost savings initiatives. We summarize the activity in accrued expenses related to the restructuring charge in our Consolidated Balance Sheets in the following table (in thousands):
|
December 31, 2002 |
Payments |
June 30, 2003 |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Employee termination benefits | $ | 1,783 | $ | (1,531 | ) | $ | 252 |
(10) Income Taxes
The following table reconciles our effective income tax rate to the federal statutory rate:
|
Three months ended June 30, 2003 |
Six months ended June 30, 2003 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Federal statutory rate | (35.0 | )% | (35.0 | )% | ||
State income, net of federal provisions | (4.9 | ) | (3.9 | ) | ||
Amortization of investment tax credit | (0.7 | ) | (0.7 | ) | ||
Minority interest preferred stock | (6.9 | ) | (14.7 | ) | ||
Dividends received deduction and other investments | (0.3 | ) | (0.7 | ) | ||
Valuation allowance | 49.2 | 56.5 | ||||
Other, net | (0.2 | ) | (0.1 | ) | ||
1.2 | % | 1.4 | % | |||
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, we have recorded a valuation allowance against the tax benefits resulting from our net operating losses, as it is more likely than not that these benefits will not be realized. Our income tax expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003 consists entirely of state income taxes.
(11) Segment Information
We currently operate our business in three reporting segments: (i) electric utility operations; (ii) natural gas utility operations; and (iii) all other, which primarily consists of our other miscellaneous service and non-energy related operations and activities that are not included in the other identified segments, together with the unallocated corporate costs and investments, and any eliminating amounts. Items below operating income are not allocated between our electric and natural gas segments. The
17
results of operations of our electric and natural gas utility segments and all other operations for the six months ended June 30, 2002, include the results of our Montana operations since February 1, 2002, the effective date of our acquisition. The operations of Expanets, Blue Dot and CornerStone, which were formerly additional reporting segments, and our interest in these subsidiaries has been reflected in the consolidated financial statements as Discontinued Operations (see Note 6 for further discussion).
The accounting policies of the operating segments are the same as the parent except that the parent allocates some of its operating expenses and interest expense to the operating segments according to a methodology designed by management for internal reporting purposes and involves estimates and assumptions. Financial data for the business segments, excluding discontinued operations, are as follows (in thousands):
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2003 |
|||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Electric |
Natural Gas |
Total Electric and Natural Gas |
All Other |
Total |
|||||||||||
Operating Revenues | $ | 162,441 | $ | 70,991 | $ | 233,432 | $ | 2,097 | $ | 235,529 | ||||||
Cost of Sales | 76,171 | 52,463 | 128,634 | 664 | 129,298 | |||||||||||
Gross Margin | 86,270 | 18,528 | 104,798 | 1,433 | 106,231 | |||||||||||
Operating, general, & administrative | 47,855 | 14,137 | 61,992 | 13,066 | 75,058 | |||||||||||
Impairment on assets held for sale | | | | 12,399 | 12,399 | |||||||||||
Depreciation | 13,490 | 3,512 | 17,002 | 430 | 17,432 | |||||||||||
Operating income (loss) | 24,925 | 879 | 25,804 | (24,462 | ) | 1,342 | ||||||||||
Interest expense | N/A | N/A | (23,955 | ) | (15,629 | ) | (39,584 | ) | ||||||||
Investment income and other | N/A | N/A | 923 | 457 | 1,380 | |||||||||||
Income (Loss) before taxes | N/A | N/A | 2,772 | (39,634 | ) | (36,862 | ) | |||||||||
Benefit (provision) for taxes | N/A | N/A | (1,231 | ) | 767 | (464 | ) | |||||||||
Loss from continuing operations | N/A | N/A | $ | 1,541 | $ | (38,867 | ) | $ | (37,326 | ) | ||||||
Total Assets | N/A | N/A | $ | 1,696,258 | $ | 543,989 | $ | 2,240,247 | ||||||||
Capital Expenditures | N/A | N/A | $ | 16,721 | $ | | $ | 16,721 | ||||||||
18
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2002 |
|||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Electric |
Natural Gas |
Total Electric and Natural Gas |
All Other |
Total |
|||||||||||
Operating Revenues | $ | 122,605 | $ | 53,179 | $ | 175,784 | $ | 1,657 | $ | 177,441 | ||||||
Cost of Sales | 41,722 | 27,000 | 68,722 | 359 | 69,081 | |||||||||||
Gross Margin | 80,883 | 26,179 | 107,062 | 1,298 | 108,360 | |||||||||||
Operating, general, & administrative | 46,633 | 15,116 | 61,749 | 2,344 | 64,093 | |||||||||||
Depreciation | 13,119 | 3,119 | 16,238 | 398 | 16,636 | |||||||||||
Operating income (loss) | 21,131 | 7,944 | 29,075 | (1,444 | ) | 27,631 | ||||||||||
Interest expense | N/A | N/A | (23,061 | ) | (5,312 | ) | (28,373 | ) | ||||||||
Investment income and other | N/A | N/A | 842 | (3,498 | ) | (2,656 | ) | |||||||||
Income (loss) before taxes | N/A | N/A | 6,856 | (10,254 | ) | (3,398 | ) | |||||||||
Benefit (provision) for taxes | N/A | N/A | (2,146 | ) | 6,619 | 4,473 | ||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations | N/A | N/A | $ | 4,710 | $ | (3,635 | ) | $ | 1,075 | |||||||
Total Assets | N/A | N/A | $ | 1,933,763 | $ | 187,991 | $ | 2,121,754 | ||||||||
Capital Expenditures | N/A | N/A | $ | 13,718 | $ | 12,303 | $ | 26,021 | ||||||||
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2003 |
|||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Electric |
Natural Gas |
Total Electric and Natural Gas |
All Other |
Total |
|||||||||||
Operating Revenues | $ | 330,649 | $ | 188,938 | $ | 519,587 | $ | 4,665 | $ | 524,252 | ||||||
Cost of Sales | 153,326 | 129,749 | 283,075 | 1,382 | 284,457 | |||||||||||
Gross Margin | 177,323 | 59,189 | 236,512 | 3,283 | 239,795 | |||||||||||
Operating, general, & administrative | 93,827 | 30,032 | 123,859 | 24,314 | 148,173 | |||||||||||
Impairment on assets held for sale | | | | 12,399 | 12,399 | |||||||||||
Depreciation | 27,075 | 6,918 | 33,993 | 862 | 34,855 | |||||||||||
Operating income (loss) | 56,421 | 22,239 | 78,660 | (34,292 | ) | 44,368 | ||||||||||
Interest expense | N/A | N/A | (50,107 | ) | (31,074 | ) | (81,181 | ) | ||||||||
Investment income and other | N/A | N/A | 988 | 167 | 1,155 | |||||||||||
Income (loss) before taxes | N/A | N/A | 29,541 | (65,199 | ) | (35,658 | ) | |||||||||
Benefit (provision) for taxes | N/A | N/A | (14,312 | ) | 13,811 | (501 | ) | |||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations | N/A | N/A | $ | 15,229 | $ | (51,388 | ) | $ | (36,159 | ) | ||||||
Total Assets | N/A | N/A | $ | 1,696,258 | $ | 543,989 | $ | 2,240,247 | ||||||||
Capital Expenditures | N/A | N/A | $ | 31,758 | $ | 68 | $ | 31,826 | ||||||||
19
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2002 |
|||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Electric |
Natural Gas |
Total Electric and Natural Gas |
All Other |
Total |
|||||||||||
Operating Revenues | $ | 219,718 | $ | 131,450 | $ | 351,168 | $ | 2,339 | $ | 353,507 | ||||||
Cost of Sales | 75,072 | 74,963 | 150,035 | 363 | 150,398 | |||||||||||
Gross Margin | 144,646 | 56,487 | 201,133 | 1,976 | 203,109 | |||||||||||
Operating, general, & administrative | 75,592 | 25,427 | 101,019 | 6,619 | 107,638 | |||||||||||
Depreciation | 23,263 | 5,534 | 28,797 | 878 | 29,675 | |||||||||||
Operating income (loss) | 45,791 | 25,526 | 71,317 | (5,521 | ) | 65,796 | ||||||||||
Interest expense | N/A | N/A | (37,274 | ) | (11,910 | ) | (49,184 | ) | ||||||||
Loss on debt extinguishment | N/A | N/A | | (20,688 | ) | (20,688 | ) | |||||||||
Investment income and other | N/A | N/A | 1,125 | (3,102 | ) | (1,977 | ) | |||||||||
Income (loss) before taxes | N/A | N/A | 35,168 | (41,221 | ) | (6,053 | ) | |||||||||
Benefit (provision) for taxes | N/A | N/A | (12,593 | ) | 18,374 | 5,781 | ||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations | N/A | N/A | $ | 22,575 | $ | (22,847 | ) | $ | (272 | ) | ||||||
Total Assets | N/A | N/A | $ | 1,933,763 | $ | 187,991 | $ | 2,121,754 | ||||||||
Capital Expenditures | N/A | N/A | $ | 24,011 | $ | 15,594 | $ | 39,605 | ||||||||
(12) New Accounting Standards
In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations, which was effective January 1, 2003. The statement provides accounting and disclosure requirements for retirement obligations associated with long-lived assets. The statement requires the present value of future retirement costs for which the Corporation has a legal obligation be recorded as liabilities with an equivalent amount added to the asset cost and depreciated over the asset life.
We have completed an assessment of the specific applicability and implications of SFAS No. 143. We have identified, but have not recognized, asset retirement obligation, or ARO, liabilities related to our electric and natural gas transmission and distribution assets. Many of these assets are installed on easements over property not owned by us. The easements are generally perpetual and only require retirement action upon abandonment or cessation of use of the property for the specified purpose. The ARO liability is not estimable for such easements as we intend to utilize these properties indefinitely. In the event we decide to abandon or cease the use of a particular easement, an ARO liability would be recorded at that time.
Our regulated utility operations have, however, previously recognized removal costs of transmission and distribution assets as a component of depreciation in accordance with regulatory treatment. To the extent these amounts do not represent SFAS No. 143 legal retirement obligations, they are to be disclosed upon adoption of the statement. As of June 30, 2003, we have estimated accrued removal costs related to our Montana transmission and distribution operations in the amount of $115.2 million and $4.7 million for our South Dakota and Nebraska operations, all of which are included in accumulated depreciation.
For our generation properties, we have accrued decommissioning costs since the generating units were first put into service in the amount of $11.6 million, which is classified as a noncurrent regulatory liability.
SFAS No. 145, Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections, was issued in April 2002. SFAS No. 145 eliminates the requirement that gains and losses from the extinguishments of debt be aggregated and classified as extraordinary
20
items, net of the related income tax. It also requires sale-leaseback treatment for certain modifications of a capital lease that result in the lease being classified as an operating lease. We adopted SFAS No. 145 on January 1, 2003. As a result of the adoption, effective January 1, 2003, we reclassified the recognition of deferred costs related to interim financing of $20.7 million, incurred for the three months ended March 31, 2002, from an extraordinary loss to loss on debt extinguishment on the Consolidated Statement of Loss. The related tax benefit of $7.2 million has been reclassified from an extraordinary loss to benefit (provision) for income taxes on the Consolidated Statement of Loss.
SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities, was issued in June 2002. SFAS No. 146 requires companies to recognize costs associated with exit or disposal activities when they are incurred rather than at the date of a commitment to an exit or disposal plan, including lease termination costs and certain employee termination benefits that are associated with a restructuring, discontinued operation, plant closing or other exit or disposal activity. SFAS No. 146 will be applied prospectively and is effective for exit or disposal activities that are initiated after December 31, 2002. We adopted SFAS No. 146 on January 1, 2003. The adoption of SFAS No. 146 did not have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations, financial position, or cash flows.
FASB Interpretation No. 45, Guarantor's Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others (FIN 45), was issued in November 2002. FIN 45 elaborates on the existing disclosure requirements for most guarantees. It also clarifies that at the time a company issues a guarantee, the company must recognize an initial liability for the fair market value of the obligations it assumes under that guarantee and must disclose that information in its interim and annual financial statements. The initial recognition and measurement provisions of the FIN 45 apply on a prospective basis to guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002. We adopted FIN 45 effective December 2002 and the applicable disclosures are reflected in Note 18, "Commitments and Contingencies."
SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based CompensationTransition and Disclosurean Amendment of FASB Statement No. 123, was issued in December 2002. It provides alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. SFAS No. 148 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2003. We do not expect to voluntarily adopt the fair value based method of SFAS No. 123 and, therefore, do not expect the measurement provisions of SFAS No. 148 to affect our financial position or results of operations. We have included disclosures required by SFAS No. 148 in these financial statements. We apply the intrinsic value based method of Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations in accounting for our stock option plan. No compensation cost is recognized, as the option exercise price is equal to the market price of the underlying stock on the date of grant. For the three and six months ended June 30, our pro forma net income and earnings per share would have been as indicated below had the fair value of option
21
grants been charged to compensation expense in accordance with SFAS No. 123 (in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
Three months ended June 30, |
Six months ended June 30, |
||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2003 |
2002 |
2003 |
2002 |
||||||||||
Earnings (loss) on common stock: | ||||||||||||||
As reported | $ | (57,809 | ) | $ | (21,415 | ) | $ | (47,890 | ) | $ | (73,818 | ) | ||
Less: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects | 321 | (436 | ) | 74 | (739 | ) | ||||||||
Pro forma | $ | (57,488 | ) | $ | (21,851 | ) | $ | (47,816 | ) | $ | (74,557 | ) | ||
Diluted earnings per average common share: | ||||||||||||||
As reported | $ | (1.55 | ) | $ | (0.79 | ) | $ | (1.28 | ) | $ | (2.69 | ) | ||
Pro forma | $ | (1.54 | ) | $ | (0.80 | ) | $ | (1.28 | ) | $ | (2.72 | ) |
FASB Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (FIN 46), was issued in January 2003. This interpretation changes the method of determining whether certain entities, including securitization entities, should be included in a company's Consolidated Financial Statements. An entity is subject to FIN 46 and is called a variable interest entity, or VIE, if it has equity that is insufficient to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties, or equity investors that cannot make significant decisions about the entity's operations, or that do not absorb the expected losses or receive the expected returns of the entity. All other entities are evaluated for consolidation in accordance with SFAS No. 94, Consolidation of All Majority-Owned Subsidiaries. A VIE is consolidated by its primary beneficiary, which is the party involved with the VIE that has a majority of the expected losses or a majority of the expected residual returns or both. The provisions of the interpretation are to be applied immediately to VIEs created after January 31, 2003, and to VIEs in which an enterprise obtains an interest after that date. For VIEs in which an enterprise holds a variable interest that it acquired before February 1, 2003, FIN 46 applies in the first fiscal period beginning after June 15, 2003. For any VIEs that must be consolidated under FIN 46 that were created before February 1, 2003, the assets, liabilities and non-controlling interest of the VIE would be initially measured at their carrying amounts with any difference between the net amount added to the balance sheet and any previously recognized interest being recognized as the cumulative effect of an accounting change. If determining the carrying amounts is not practicable, fair value at the date FIN 46 first applies may be used to measure the assets, liabilities and non-controlling interest of the VIE. FIN 46 also mandates new disclosures about VIEs, some of which are required to be presented in financial statements issued after January 31, 2003. We will be required to deconsolidate our Subsidiary Trusts, which hold our Company Obligated Mandatorily Redeemable Preferred Securities, upon adoption of FIN 46. The impact of deconsolidation is that we will report our investments in Subsidiary Trusts as a separate investment in unconsolidated entity and reflect notes payable to the Subsidiary Trusts on our consolidated balance sheet.
In April 2003, FASB issued SFAS No. 149, Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, which amends and clarifies financial accounting and reporting for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts (collectively referred to as derivatives) and for hedging activities under SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. SFAS No. 149 is effective prospectively for contracts entered into or modified after June 30, 2003, and for hedging relationships designated after June 30, 2003. The exception to these requirements are the provisions of SFAS No. 149 related to SFAS No. 133 implementation issues that have been effective for fiscal quarters that began prior to June 15, 2003, should continue to be applied in accordance with their respective effective dates. In addition, paragraphs 7(a) and 23(a),
22
which relate to forward purchases or sales of when-issued securities or other securities that do not yet exist, should be applied to both existing contracts and new contracts entered into after June 30, 2003. We do not expect a material impact on our results of operations or financial condition as a result of the adoption of SFAS No. 149.
In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, Accounting for Certain Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity, which establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. SFAS No. 150 requires that an issuer classify a financial instrument that is within its scope, which may have previously been reported as equity, as a liability or an asset in some circumstances. SFAS No. 150 is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise is effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. The impact of this statement on our results of operations and financial position is currently under review by management. As discussed above, we may be required to deconsolidate our Subsidiary Trusts upon adoption of FIN 46. If our Subsidiary Trusts are deconsolidated, we do not expect SFAS No. 150 to impact our results of operations and financial position.
(13) Reclassifications
Certain 2002 amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 2003 presentation. Such reclassifications have no impact on net loss or shareholders' deficit as previously reported.
(14) Earnings (Loss) per Average Common Share
Basic earnings per share is computed on the basis of the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share is computed on the basis of the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus the effect of the outstanding stock options and warrants. The following table presents the shares used in computing the basic and diluted earnings per share for 2003 and 2002:
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2003 |
2002 |
2003 |
2002 |
||||
Average Common Shares Outstanding For Basic Computation | 37,396,762 | 27,396,762 | 37,396,762 | 27,396,762 | ||||
Dilutive Effect of: | ||||||||
Stock Options | | 693 | | | ||||
Average Common Shares Outstanding For Diluted Computation | 37,396,762 | 27,397,455 | 37,396,762 | 27,396,762 | ||||
Certain outstanding antidilutive options have been excluded from the earnings per share calculation. These options total 1,884,159 and 2,659,981 for the three months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, these options total 1,884,159 and 2,659,981, respectively.
(15) Impairment on assets held for sale
During the second quarter of 2003, we recorded an additional impairment charge of $12.4 million due to further decline in the estimated realizable value of our investment in our Montana First Megawatts project. We had previously recorded an impairment charge of $35.7 million during the fourth quarter of 2002. We are actively attempting to sell the equipment and land related to this project.
(16) Loss on Debt Extinguishment
In March 2002, we retired a $720 million term loan, due February 2003, that was used for interim financing for the acquisition of the electric and natural gas transmission and distribution business of The Montana Power Company. The recognition of deferred costs related to the interim financing resulted in a loss of $20.7 million.
23
(17) Employee Benefit Plans
In May 2003, our Board of Directors adopted a resolution to terminate or amend various employee benefit plans. We terminated our non-qualified supplemental 401(k) plan effective May 6, 2003. Any investment elections in our common stock were presented as Treasury Stock; other investments as part of Investments; and an offsetting liability for both as part of Other Noncurrent Liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. In June 2003, plan assets were distributed to participants (including 174,019 treasury shares) and no further liability remains. Our employee stock purchase plan was also terminated, with no impact to our operating results.
Two nonqualified postretirement defined benefit plans were amended effective May 6, 2003 to permit vested participants the option of continuing the current benefits level or take a present value lump sum distribution. We recognized a loss of approximately $0.3 million in the second quarter due to the amendment of these plans. A third nonqualified postretirement defined benefit plan was terminated effective May 6, 2003, with no impact to our operating results.
Our Employee Stock Ownership Plan ("ESOP") was terminated effective July 19, 2003. Due to the suspension of our common stock dividend and the declining stock price, we accrued $5.9 million as of December 31, 2002, to satisfy the ESOP loan requirement. This loan was paid off in the second quarter and no further liability remains. Shares held by the plan were included in the number of average shares outstanding when computing our basic and diluted earnings per share, therefore the termination has no impact on these calculations.
(18) Commitments and Contingencies
Environmental Liabilities
We are subject to numerous state and federal environmental regulations. The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (the Act) stipulate limitations on sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide emissions from coal-fired power plants. We believe we can comply with such sulfur dioxide emission requirements at our generating plants and that we are in compliance with all presently applicable environmental protection requirements and regulations. We are also subject to other environmental statutes and regulations including matters related to former manufactured gas plant sites. The range of exposure for environmental remediation obligations is estimated to be $35.4 million to $72.6 million. We have an environmental reserve of $35.4 million at June 30, 2003, primarily related to liabilities from our Montana operations.
Legal Proceedings
We, and certain of our present and former officers and directors, were named as defendants in numerous complaints purporting to be class actions filed in the United States District Court for the District of South Dakota, Southern Division, alleging violations of Sections 11, 12 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. The complaints contained varying allegations, including that the defendants misrepresented and omitted material facts with respect to our 2000, 2001, and 2002 financial results and operations included in our filings with the SEC, press releases, and registration statements and prospectuses disseminated in connection with certain offerings of debt, equity, and trust preferred securities. The complaints seek unspecified compensatory damages, rescission, and attorneys' fees and costs as well as accountants' and experts' fees. In June 2003, the complaints were consolidated in the United States District Court for the District of South Dakota and given the caption In re NorthWestern Corporation Securities Litigation, Case No. 03-4049, and Carpenters Pension Trust for Southern California, Oppenheim Investment Management, LLC, and Richard C. Slump were named as co-lead plaintiffs (the "Lead Plaintiffs"). In July 2003, the Lead Plaintiffs filed a consolidated amended class action complaint naming as defendants NorthWestern, NorthWestern Capital Financing II and III, Blue Dot, Expanets, certain of our present and former officers and directors, along with a number of investment banks that participated in the securities offerings. The amended complaint makes many of the same allegations as the pre-consolidated complaints, including that the defendants misrepresented
24
and omitted material facts concerning the business operations and financial performance of NorthWestern, Expanets, Blue Dot and CornerStone, overstated NorthWestern's revenues and earnings by, among other things, maintaining insufficient reserves for accounts receivable at Expanets, failing to disclose billing problems and lapses and data conversion problems, failing to make full disclosures of problems (including the billing and data conversion issues) arising from the implementation of Expanets' EXPERT system, concealing losses at Expanets and Blue Dot by improperly allocating losses to minority interest shareholders, maintaining insufficient internal controls, and profiting from improper related-party transactions. We, and certain of our present and former officers and directors, were also named as defendants in two complaints purporting to be class actions which were filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, entitled Sanford & Beatrice Golman Family Trust, et al. v. NorthWestern Corp., et al., Case No. 03CV3223, and Arthur Laufer v. Merle Lewis, et al., Case No. 03CV3716, which were brought on behalf of the purchasers of our 7.20%, 8.25%, and 8.10% trust preferred securities which were offered and sold pursuant to our registration statement on Form S-3 filed on July 12, 1999. The plaintiffs' claims are based on similar allegations of material misrepresentations and omissions of fact relating to the registration statement in violation of Sections 11 and 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 and they seek unspecified compensatory damages, rescission and attorneys', accountants' and experts' fees. In July 2003, Arthur Laufer v. Merle Lewis, et al. was transferred to the District of South Dakota and consolidated with the consolidated actions pending in that court. We intend to vigorously defend against these lawsuits. We cannot currently predict the impact or resolution of this litigation or reasonably estimate a range of possible loss, which could be material, and the resolution of these lawsuits may harm our business and have a material adverse impact on our financial condition.
Certain of our present and former officers and directors and NorthWestern, as a nominal defendant, have been named in two shareholder derivative actions commenced in the United States District Court for the District of South Dakota, Southern Division, entitled Deryl Lusty, et al. v. Richard R. Hylland, et al., Case No. CIV034091 and Jerald and Betty Stewart, et al. v. Richard R. Hylland, et al., Case No. CIV034114. These shareholder derivative lawsuits allege that the defendants breached various fiduciary duties based upon the same general set of alleged facts and circumstances as the federal shareholder suits. The plaintiffs seek unspecified compensatory damages, restitution of improper salaries, insider trading profits and payments from NorthWestern, and disgorgement under the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. In July 2003, the complaints were consolidated in the United States District Court for the District of South Dakota and given the caption In re NorthWestern Corporation Derivative Litigation, Case No. 03-4091. We cannot currently predict the impact or resolution of this litigation or reasonably estimate a range of possible loss, which could be material, and the resolution of these lawsuits may harm our business and have a material adverse impact on our financial condition.
In April 2003, the SEC notified NorthWestern that it is conducting an informal inquiry relating to questions regarding the restatements and other accounting and financial reporting matters. We are cooperating fully with the SEC's informal inquiry and have provided requested information as expeditiously as possible. Other than the informal SEC inquiry, as of the date hereof, we are not aware of any additional litigation or inquiry or investigation having been commenced against us related to these matters, but we cannot predict whether or not any such litigation or regulatory inquiry or investigation will be commenced or, if it is, the outcome of any such litigation or regulatory inquiry or investigation.
We are one of several defendants in a class action lawsuit entitled McGreevey, et al. v. The Montana Power Company, et al., now pending in federal court in Montana. The lawsuit, which was filed by the former shareholders of The Montana Power Company (most of whom became shareholders of Touch America Holdings, Inc. as a result of a corporate reorganization of The Montana Power Company), claims that the disposition of various generating and energy-related assets by The Montana Power Company were void because of the failure to obtain shareholder approval for the transactions. Plaintiffs thus seek to reverse those transactions, or receive fair value for their stock as of late 2001,
25
when plaintiffs claim shareholder approval should have been sought. NorthWestern Corporation is named as a defendant due to the fact that we purchased Montana Power LLC, which plaintiffs claim is a successor to The Montana Power Company. Due to the recent filing by Touch America Holdings, Inc. for bankruptcy protection, the defendants removed the case to federal court, where it now is pending. We intend to vigorously defend against this lawsuit. We cannot currently predict the impact or resolution of this litigation or reasonably estimate a range of possible loss, which could be material, and the resolution of this lawsuit may harm our business and have a material adverse impact on our financial condition.
We are also one of several defendants in a class action lawsuit entitled In Re Touch America ERISA Litigation, which is currently pending in federal court in Montana. The lawsuit was filed by participants in the former Montana Power Company retirement savings plan and alleges that there was a breach of fiduciary duty in connection with the employee stock ownership aspects of the plan. The federal court has recently entered orders indefinitely staying the ERISA litigation because of Touch America Holdings Inc.'s bankruptcy filing. We intend to vigorously defend against these lawsuits. We cannot currently predict the impact or resolution of this litigation or reasonably estimate a range of possible loss, which could be material, and the resolution of this lawsuit may harm our business and have a material adverse impact on our financial condition.
We, and certain of our present and former officers and directors, were named as defendants in certain complaints filed against CornerStone Propane Partners LP, and other defendants purporting to be class actions which were filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California by purchasers of units of CornerStone Propane Partners alleging violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. Through November 1, 2002, we held an economic equity interest in a subsidiary that serves as the managing general partner of CornerStone Propane Partners, L.P. Certain present and former officers and directors of NorthWestern who are named as defendants in certain of these actions have also been sued in their capacities as directors of the managing general partner. These complaints allege that defendants sold units of CornerStone Propane Partners, L.P. based upon false and misleading statements and failed to disclose material information about CornerStone Propane Partners' financial condition and future prospects, including overpayment for acquisitions, overstating earnings and net income, and that it lacked adequate internal controls. The plaintiffs seek compensatory damages, prejudgment and post judgment interest and costs, injunctive relief, and other relief. We intend to vigorously defend against these lawsuits. We cannot currently predict the impact or resolution of this litigation or reasonably estimate a range of possible loss, which could be material, and the resolution of this lawsuit may harm our business and have a material adverse impact on our financial condition.
Certain of our present and former officers and directors, and CornerStone Propane Partners, L.P., as a nominal defendant, are among other defendants named in two derivative actions commenced in the Superior Court for the State of California, County of Santa Cruz, entitled Adelaide Andrews v. Keith G. Baxter, et al., Case No. CV146662 and Ralph Tyndall v. Keith G. Baxter, et al., Case No. CV146661. These derivative lawsuits allege that the defendants breached various fiduciary duties based upon the same general set of alleged facts and circumstances as the federal unitholder suits. The plaintiffs seek unspecified compensatory damages, treble damages pursuant to the California Corporations Code, injunctive relief, restitution, disgorgement, costs, and other relief. We cannot currently predict the impact or resolution of this litigation or reasonably estimate a range of possible loss, which could be material, and the resolution of these lawsuits may harm our business and have a material adverse impact on our financial condition.
On April 30, 2003, Mr. Richard Hylland, our former President and Chief Operating Officer, filed a demand for arbitration of contract claims under his employment agreement, as well as tort claims for defamation, infliction of emotional distress and tortuous interference and a claim for punitive damages. Mr. Hylland is seeking relief in an amount of $25 million, plus interest, attorney's fees, costs, and punitive damages. We dispute Mr. Hylland's claims and intend to vigorously defend the arbitration. On
26
May 8, 2003, we reported that the Special Committee of the Board formed to evaluate Mr. Hylland's performance and conduct in connection with the management of NorthWestern and its subsidiaries had completed its evaluation. Based on the recommendations of the Special Committee, on May 6, 2003, the Board determined that Mr. Hylland's performance and conduct as President and Chief Operating Officer warranted termination under his employment contract.
We are also subject to various other legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, the amount of ultimate liability with respect to these actions will not materially affect our financial position or results of operations.
Residual value guarantees
We have residual value guarantees related to certain vehicles under operating leases by Expanets and Blue Dot, in the event of default and subsequent failure to cure such default. At June 30, 2003, the maximum exposure under these residual value guarantees is approximately $0.9 million and $19.1 million related to Expanets and Blue Dot, respectively.
Performance Bonds
Expanets has various performance bonds and guarantees in place to cover the installation of equipment and inventory purchases. The maximum potential payout under these performance bonds is $16.6 million and $49.9 million as of June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively.
In May 2003 a vendor of Expanets presented a claim against a performance bond. We advanced $10 million in satisfaction of this claim pursuant to a previously existing indemnity agreement supporting the performance bond. Expanets has not yet made repayments on the advance. Expanets has located and is using alternative supply sources.
Blue Dot has various license, bid and performance bonds in place to secure performance of contracts and the adequate provision of services. The maximum potential payout under these performance bonds is $9.6 million and $14.3 million as of June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively.
We have issued indemnity agreements that support the outstanding performance bonds of Expanets and Blue Dot.
Letters of Credit
We have various letter of credit requirements and other collateral obligations of approximately $21.1 million and $48.1 million as of June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively. Approximately $9 million and $18.6 million of these obligations as of June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively, serve to support performance bonds primarily related to Expanets and Blue Dot. In addition, included in restricted cash at June 30, 2003 is $7.1 million that supports performance bonds related to Expanets and Blue Dot. No such amounts existed at December 31, 2002.
Other Contractual Obligations
On June 19, 2002, NorthWestern Energy Marketing, LLC (NEM), our power marketing subsidiary, entered into two five-year power supply contracts to supply a total of approximately 20 megawatts of electricity to customers located in Montana. These supply obligations commenced on July 1, 2002 and continue through June 30, 2007. NEM secured supply to cover these contractual obligations through June 30, 2003. Due to our financial condition, NEM has been unable to secure a source of power to cover its contractual obligation subsequent to June 30, 2003. Upon notification, NEM's two customers immediately covered their supply need by becoming customers served by the default supply provider. NEM's estimated maximum exposure over the remaining term of the contracts based on current and projected default supply prices is approximately $3.9 million. NEM is currently involved in settlement discussions with its two customers.
On June 6, 2003, Blue Dot entered into a forbearance agreement with its credit facility provider. The forbearance agreement, which expires on August 29, 2003, contains certain covenants including information updates related to the potential sale of Blue Dot, certain limitations on disbursements, and
27
certain minimum thresholds for receipts. Blue Dot has begun discussions with its credit facility provider regarding the circumstances and conditions under which its forbearance agreement could be extended, although no assurances can be given that its credit facility provider will extend the term of the forbearance period. At June 30, 2003, the amount outstanding under this facility was $18.9 million, and the bank was holding restricted cash from Blue Dot in the amount of $3.5 million.
In June 2003, Expanets closed on a two-year, $25 million secured line of credit with a financial institution for working capital purposes. In connection with this line of credit, a financial institution was holding $2 million in restricted cash as of June 30, 2003. The line of credit is secured by accounts receivable and has a borrowing base equal to 75% of eligible accounts receivable minus reserves. Expanets had an available borrowing capacity of approximately $5.7 million at June 30, 2003. Expanets had no borrowings under this facility at June 30, 2003. In July 2003, Expanets utilized $3.5 million of capacity under this line of credit to post letters of credit with suppliers. As of August 13, 2003, Expanets has an available borrowing capacity of approximately $10 million, however their borrowing capacity fluctuates daily based on billings and cash receipts.
Expanets has a note payable to Avaya with payments of approximately $9 million due in January, April and July of 2004, and an outstanding balance of $27.1 million as of June 30, 2003. The note bears interest at 15% per annum. Amounts repaid under this facility may not be reborrowed. This note is in current and noncurrent liabilities of discontinued operations on the consolidated balance sheets. If Expanets defaults under this facility, we may be obligated to purchase inventory and accounts from Avaya in an amount equal to the outstanding balance of the facility.
Blue Dot and Expanets, in making certain of their business acquisitions, issued equity in various classes and series to the former owners of such businesses. In connection with those issuances, in certain cases, Blue Dot and Expanets entered into agreements providing exchange or put rights giving the security holders certain rights related to those shares. NorthWestern Growth Corporation entered into agreements with Blue Dot and Expanets, under which it agreed to support obligations related to the exercise of the exchange or put rights in certain of the underlying agreements. Blue Dot and Expanets have requested that NorthWestern Growth Corporation provide funds necessary to perform their obligations under those agreements.
NorthWestern has indicated that it believes its obligations with respect to Expanets' instruments have expired and that, in any event, no additional funds will be provided while NorthWestern pursues the sale or disposition of those businesses or their assets. The maximum aggregate amount of payments that may be required of NorthWestern under the various Expanets agreements is $4.3 million as of June 30, 2003.
Blue Dot has defaulted on certain equity redemption obligations totaling $7.7 million with respect to shares issued to the former owners of four separate businesses or their affiliates. Blue Dot entered into agreements whereby Blue Dot sold two of these businesses back to the original owners or their affiliates in two transactions that resulted in the return of shares issued to the former owners of these businesses or their affiliates, the termination of the outstanding equity redemption obligations associated with these shares, and net cash proceeds of $1.8 million to Blue Dot. Blue Dot has entered into certain pending agreements for the sale of the remaining two businesses to the original owners or their affiliates, subject to Blue Dot board of director approval and consent from Blue Dot's credit facility provider, which will result in the return of shares issued to the former owners of these businesses or their affiliates, the termination of the outstanding equity redemption obligations associated with these shares, and the payment of approximately $200,000 cash proceeds to Blue Dot. The maximum aggregate amount of payments that may be required of NorthWestern under the various Blue Dot agreements is approximately $22.4 million as of June 30, 2003, of which approximately $6.7 million may be required within the next twelve months.
28
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Unless the context requires otherwise, references to "we," "us," "our" and "NorthWestern" refer specifically to NorthWestern Corporation and its subsidiaries.
OVERVIEW
We continued to face substantial challenges with respect to our operations and liquidity during the second quarter of 2003 and we will continue to face those challenges in the future. If we are unable to address these challenges and to effectuate our turnaround plan, as described below, which will require significantly reducing our debt, restructuring our debt and generating cash from additional funding sources or proceeds from the sale of non core assets, then we may be required to seek protection under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, thus creating substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. We cannot predict when a Bankruptcy filing, if any, would be made, but it could occur in the near term. If we file for such protection, our creditors will be paid prior to our stockholders. In addition, if we file for bankruptcy protection, our stockholders may lose their entire investment.
Our financial condition has been significantly and negatively affected by the poor performance of our non-energy businesses and our significant indebtedness. We continue to face a number of challenges, including the following:
The key elements of our turnaround plan are to: (i) focus on our core electric and natural gas utility businesses; (ii) substantially reduce debt by applying net proceeds from the sale of non-core assets and other means; (iii) reduce operating costs; and (iv) improve internal financial controls and procedures. We have retained a financial restructuring advisory firm to assist us in implementing our turnaround plan.
29
We began working on elements of our turnaround plan during the second quarter of 2003 as described below. However, our ability to effectuate our turnaround plan depends on many factors which are difficult to influence or which are beyond our control, such as obtaining the approval of restated articles of incorporation by our stockholders, selling non-core assets at favorable prices or significantly increasing the market price of our publicly traded securities. If we are unable to effectuate our turnaround plan, which will require significantly reducing our debt, restructuring our debt and generating cash from additional funding sources or proceeds from the sale of non core assets, then we will not be able to fund our operations or service our substantial indebtedness and we may be required to pursue alternate means of resolving our financial problems, which could include seeking protection under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. In particular, in the near term we may default on certain covenants under the instruments governing our indebtedness, including our credit agreement.
We operate our business in three reporting segments: (i) electric utility operations; (ii) natural gas utility operations; and (iii) all other, which primarily consists of our other miscellaneous service and non-energy related operations and activities that are not included in the other identified segments, together with the unallocated corporate costs and investments, and any eliminating amounts. The operations of Expanets, Blue Dot and CornerStone, each of which were formerly reporting segments, and our interest in these subsidiaries has been reflected in the consolidated financial statements as Discontinued Operations.
We have eliminated the dividend on our common stock, which represented approximately $38 million in distributions in 2002, and elected to defer distributions on the publicly traded trust preferred securities of our subsidiary trusts. We do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock for the foreseeable future. In addition, we are currently prohibited from paying dividends on our common stock under Delaware law. Our senior secured term loan also prohibits the payment of dividends during any period of default under that agreement. We are not currently in default under our senior secured term loan. To the extent that payment of a cash dividend on our common stock becomes permissible under Delaware law, we would only be able to pay a cash dividend on our common stock to the extent that all required distributions (including any deferred amounts) on the publicly traded trust preferred securities of our subsidiary trusts have been made.
We have engaged a financial adviser to assist us in effecting the sale of Blue Dot and Expanets. With our financial advisor we are conducting a private auction with respect to Blue Dot and are seeking to exit this business. Although we hope to conclude our disposition of Blue Dot in 2003, we do not anticipate receiving a material amount of net cash proceeds in excess of liabilities in the transaction. We are also seeking to sell Expanets. We are attempting to conclude this transaction during 2003. Any final arrangements relating to the sale of Blue Dot or Expanets are subject to numerous legal, accounting, financial and business issues being resolved. If we are successful in consummating the sale of Expanets, we hope to receive net cash proceeds significantly in excess of third party liabilities. We will not make any additional investments in, or commitments to, Expanets and Blue Dot. In addition, in January 2003 the MPSC restricted our ability to make additional investments or commitments to our non-regulated businesses to $10 million in the aggregate unless we obtain the prior approval of the MPSC.
We are also attempting to sell other non-core assets, including the Montana First Megawatts generation project, and are seeking to enforce an existing contract to sell certain Colstrip transmission assets to a third party. During the second quarter, we consummated the sale of one non-core business for cash consideration of $6.6 million and a note receivable of $4.7 million. The acquiring entity may elect to prepay the note receivable within one year by presenting unsecured bonds or trust preferred obligated securities of NorthWestern, which will be accepted at face value. We recorded the carrying value of the note receivable based on the fair value of our trust preferred securities at the date of the transaction and we recognized a loss of approximately $3.4 million on this sale.
30
We face considerable challenges in selling our non-energy businesses, which have historically not been cash flow contributors to the organization. Expanets faces challenges with respect to, among other things, economic conditions in the telecommunications market and problems with its Expert system, an enterprise information technology and management system. Blue Dot has defaulted on certain shareholder obligations. Blue Dot faces serious liquidity concerns within the near term, as it seeks to extend its forbearance agreement with its credit facility provider, obtain favorable payment terms related to its upcoming insurance renewals and meet other cash payment obligations become due. If we are unable to dispose of Blue Dot within the next three months, we may incur additional claims related to amounts we have guaranteed on behalf of Blue Dot. Each company also faces challenges related to retention of its employees, key managers, customers and suppliers. The challenges faced by Expanets and Blue Dot present a substantial risk of serious disruption to these businesses and have materially and adversely affected their value. We cannot predict whether or when such assets may be sold, or if we can obtain a favorable price or other terms in any such sale. Absent the receipt of significant proceeds from the sale of non core assets, the raising of additional capital or a restructuring of our debt, we will not have the ability to reduce our debt or meet our maturing debt obligations. Even if we are successful in selling some or all of our non-core assets, we will have to restructure our debt or seek new capital.
In addition to the sale of non-core assets and other steps we have taken and will take to improve operating performance and preserve cash, we believe that reduction of debt will require the issuance of additional equity securities, either to raise cash or to exchange for the retirement of outstanding debt. We are asking that our stockholders approve, at our annual meeting scheduled for August 26, 2003, a significant increase in the number of shares of authorized common stock, a significant increase in the number of shares of preferred stock and a significant amendment of preferred stock terms, together with other changes to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation, in order to provide us with greater flexibility in pursuing our turnaround plan. We believe that, unless a new Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation is adopted, we will not be able to effectuate our turnaround plan. Unless the market price of our common stock and our total market capitalization increases significantly, we could become subject to a delisting proceeding by the NYSE. If our common shares are delisted from the NYSE, raising capital in the future or using our shares to extinguish all or part of our debt would be significantly more difficult.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is based on our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We base our estimates on historical experience and other assumptions that are believed to be proper and reasonable under the circumstances. We continually evaluate the appropriateness of our estimates and assumptions, including those related to goodwill and intangible assets, impairment of long-lived assets, revenue recognition, allowance for doubtful accounts, and minority interest in consolidated subsidiaries, among others. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
We have identified the policies and related procedures below as critical to understanding our historical and future performance, as these polices affect the reported amounts of revenue and the more significant areas involving management's judgments and estimates.
Goodwill and Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets
We believe that the accounting estimate related to determining the fair value of goodwill, and thus any impairment, is a "critical accounting estimate" because: (i) it is highly susceptible to change from
31
period to period since it requires company management to make cash flow assumptions about future revenues, operating costs and discount rates over an indefinite life; and (ii) recognizing an impairment has had a significant impact on the assets reported on our balance sheet and our operating results. Management's assumptions about future sales margins and volumes require significant judgment because actual margins and volumes have fluctuated in the past and are expected to continue to do so. In estimating future margins, we use our internal budgets.
SFAS No. 142 was issued during 2001 and is effective for all fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001. According to the guidance set forth in SFAS No. 142, we are required to evaluate our goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment at least annually (October 1) and more frequently when indications of impairment exist. Accounting standards require that if the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value including goodwill, an impairment charge for goodwill must be recognized in the financial statements. To measure the amount of the impairment loss to recognize, we compare the implied fair value of the reporting unit's goodwill with its carrying value.
Qualifying Facilities Liability
Certain Qualifying Facilities, or QFs, require us to purchase minimum amounts of energy at prices ranging from $65 to $138 per megawatt hour through 2029. As of June 30, 2003, our gross contractual obligation related to the QFs is approximately $1.8 billion through 2029. A portion of the costs incurred to purchase this energy is recoverable though rates authorized by the MPSC, totaling approximately $1.4 billion though 2029. Upon completion of the purchase price allocation related to our acquisition of the electric and natural gas transmission and distribution business of The Montana Power Company, we established a liability of $134.3 million, based on the net present value of the difference between our obligations under the QFs and the related amount recoverable. The determination of the discount rate used to establish this liability was a significant assumption. We determined the appropriate discount rate to be 8.75%, in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts No. 7, Using Cash Flow Information and Present Value in Accounting Measures. We believe that 8.75% approximates the rate we could have negotiated with an independent lender for a similar transaction under comparable terms and conditions as of the acquisition date. In computing the liability, we have also had to make various estimates in relation to contract costs, capacity utilization, and recoverable amounts. Actual utilization and regulatory changes may significantly impact our results of operations.
Long-lived Assets
We evaluate our property, plant and equipment and definite-lived intangible assets for impairment whenever indicators of impairment exist. SFAS No. 144 requires that if the sum of the undiscounted cash flows from a company's asset, without interest charges that will be recognized as expenses when incurred, is less than the carrying value of the asset, impairment must be recognized in the financial statements. If an asset is deemed to be impaired, the amount of the impairment loss recognized represents the excess of the asset's carrying value as compared to its estimated fair value, based on management's assumptions and projections.
During the second quarter of 2003, we recorded an additional impairment charge of $12.4 million due to further decline in the estimated realizable value of our investment in our Montana First Megawatts project. We had previously recorded an impairment charge of $35.7 million during the fourth quarter of 2002.
Revenue Recognition
Revenues are recognized differently depending on the type of revenue. For NorthWestern Energy's South Dakota and Nebraska operations, as prescribed by the respective regulatory authorities, electric
32
and natural gas utility revenues are based on billings rendered to customers. Customers are billed on a monthly cycle basis. For NorthWestern Energy's Montana operations, as prescribed by the MPSC, operating revenues are recorded monthly on the basis of consumption or services rendered. To match revenues with associated expenses, we accrue unbilled revenues for electric and natural gas services delivered to the customers but not yet billed at month-end.
Regulatory Assets and Liabilities
Our regulated operations are subject to the provisions of SFAS No. 71, Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types of Regulations. Our regulatory assets are the probable future revenues associated with certain costs to be recovered from customers through the ratemaking process, including our estimate of amounts recoverable for natural gas purchases. Regulatory liabilities are the probable future reductions in revenues associated with amounts to be credited to customers through the ratemaking process. If any part of our operations become no longer subject to the provisions of SFAS No. 71, the probable future recovery of or reduction in revenue with respect to the related regulatory assets and liabilities would need to be evaluated. In addition, we would need to determine if there was any impairment to the carrying costs of deregulated plant and inventory assets.
While we believe that our assumption regarding future regulatory actions is reasonable, different assumptions could materially affect our results.
Pension and Postretirement Benefit Plans
Our reported costs of providing pension and other postretirement benefits are dependent upon numerous factors resulting from actual plan experience and assumptions of future experience.
Pension and other postretirement benefit costs, for example, are impacted by actual employee demographics (including age and compensation levels), the level of contributions we make to the plans, earnings on plan assets, and health care cost trends. Changes made to the provisions of the plans may also impact current and future other postretirement benefit costs. Other postretirement benefit costs may also be significantly affected by changes in key actuarial assumptions, including anticipated rates of return on plan assets and the discount rates used in determining the postretirement benefit obligation and postretirement costs.
As a result of the factors listed above, significant portions of other postretirement benefit costs recorded in any period do not reflect (and are generally greater than) the actual benefits provided to pension plan participants.
Our pension and other postretirement benefit plan assets are primarily made up of equity and fixed income investments. Fluctuations in actual equity market returns as well as changes in general interest rates may result in increased or decreased pension and other postretirement benefit costs in future periods. Likewise, changes in assumptions regarding current discount rates and expected rates of return on plan assets could also increase or decrease recorded pension and other postretirement benefit costs.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Three-Month and Six-Month Periods Ended June 30, 2003 Compared to Three-Month and Six-Month Periods Ended June 30, 2002.
CONSOLIDATED OPERATING RESULTS
The following is a summary of our consolidated results of operations for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2003 and June 30, 2002. Our consolidated results include the results of our divisions and subsidiaries constituting each of our business segments. This discussion is followed
33
by a more detailed discussion of operating results by segment. Our "All Other" category primarily consists of our other miscellaneous service activities, which are not included in the other identified segments together with unallocated corporate costs. See "Segment InformationAll Other Operations" for a discussion of the items contained in our "All Other" category. Product and service category fluctuations highlighted at the consolidated level are more fully explained in the segment discussions. The results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2002, include the results of our Montana operations since February 1, 2002, the effective date of the acquisition.
Consolidated losses on common stock were $57.8 million in the second quarter of 2003, an increase of $36.4 million from consolidated losses of $21.4 million in the second quarter of 2002. This increase in consolidated losses on common stock was primarily due to an asset impairment charge of $12.4 million related to our investment in the Montana First Megawatts project, an $11.7 million increase in general and administrative expenses, primarily due to increased legal and other professional services and employee benefit costs, along with increased interest expense of approximately $11.2 million. We anticipate our fees for professional services will continue to significantly exceed prior year amounts. Annual premium requirements for directors and officers liability insurance increased significantly beginning in June 2003, and as a result we expect general and administrative expenses to increase by approximately $2.0 million per quarter related to this matter. Consolidated losses on common stock were $47.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003, an improvement of $25.9 million over 2002. The improvement was primarily a result of improved gross margin of $36.7 million, reduced losses on discontinued operations of $63.0 million and a loss on debt extinguishments of $20.7 million in 2002, offset by an increase in operating expenses of $58.1 million, increased interest expense of $32.0 million in 2003 and an increase in the consolidated tax provision of $6.3 million.
SEGMENT INFORMATION
ELECTRIC UTILITY SEGMENT OPERATIONS
Revenues in the second quarter of 2003 were $162.4 million, an increase of $39.8 million, or 32.5%, from results in the second quarter of 2002. Our Montana operations contributed a $41.0 million increase, primarily due to a $37.4 million increase in revenue recovered for purchased power supply costs. As these costs are also reflected in cost of sales, there is no gross margin impact. Also contributing to the increase was $3.4 million of additional revenues from new wholesale customers and an increase of $2.3 million due to a 4.3% increase in retail volumes. Our South Dakota operations experienced a decrease of $1.2 million, or 5.4%, due to a 48% decrease in wholesale volumes. Revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2003 of $330.6 million were $110.9 million, or 50.5%, higher than revenues for the first six months of 2002. The January 2003 results of our Montana operations contributed approximately $47.8 million of this increase. In addition, revenues from February through June 2003, as compared to the same period in 2002, increased approximately $62.0 million, primarily due to a $58.5 million increase as a result of a 108.7% increase in revenue recovered for purchased power supply costs. In addition, $3.4 million of additional revenues from new wholesale customers and an increase of $2.4 million due to a 24.4% average increase in retail volumes. Our South Dakota operations contributed $1.1 million of the increase due to increased retail volumes.
Cost of sales in the second quarter of 2003 was $76.2 million, an increase of $34.4 million, or 82.6%, from results in the second quarter of 2002. Purchased power supply costs incurred by our Montana operations, which are recovered in rates, increased $37.4 million as a result of new power supply agreements effective July 1, 2002. Wholesale cost of sales increased approximately $3.1 million in 2003 as compared to 2002 due to costs related to the new customers discussed above, partially offset by decreased maintenance costs. Cost of sales within our South Dakota operations remained consistent with 2002. For the six months ended June 30, 2003, costs of $153.3 million were $78.3 million higher than costs for the six months ended June 30, 2002. The January 2003 results of our Montana
34
operations contributed approximately $23.9 million of this increase. Purchased power supply costs, which are recovered in rates, increased for February through June 2003, as compared to 2002, by $58.5 million as a result of new power supply agreements effective July 1, 2002. Wholesale cost of sales were approximately $2.6 million higher in 2003 as compared to 2002 due to costs related to the new customers discussed above partially offset by decreased maintenance costs. In addition, electric generating costs within our South Dakota operations increased approximately $1.3 million due primarily to slightly higher coal costs.
Gross margin in the second quarter of 2003 was $86.3 million, an increase of $5.4 million over gross margin in the second quarter of 2002. Our Montana operations contributed a $6.7 million increase primarily due to increases in volume discussed above and increased transmission revenue from off-system customers. Gross margin in our South Dakota operations decreased $1.3 million due primarily to a decrease in wholesale volume sales. As a percentage of revenue, gross margin in the second quarter of 2003 was 53.1%, compared to 66.0% in the second quarter of 2002. Gross margin as a percentage of revenue is impacted by the fluctuations that occur in power supply costs, which are collected in rates from customers. While these fluctuations impact gross margin as a percentage of revenue, they have no actual impact on gross margin amounts. For the six months ended June 30, 2003, margins of $177.3 million were $32.7 million, or 22.6%, higher than margins for the six months ended June 30, 2002. The January 2003 results of our Montana operations contributed $23.9 million of this increase. Similar to the quarter, our Montana operations contributed $9.0 million of the increase for the period of February through June of 2003 as compared to 2002 due to higher retail and wholesale volume sales and increased transmission revenue from off-system customers. Our South Dakota operations remained consistent with the prior period. Margins as a percentage of revenues decreased to 53.6% for the six months ended June 30, 2003, from 65.8% for the six months ended June 30, 2002. Similar to the quarterly change, this is a result of power supply cost fluctuations, which do not impact gross margin amounts.
Operating expenses in the second quarter of 2003 were $61.3 million, an increase of $1.6 million over results in the second quarter of 2002. Operating, general and administrative expenses in the second quarter of 2003 were $47.9 million, an increase of $1.2 million over results in the second quarter of 2002, primarily due to increased legal and employee benefit costs. Depreciation in the second quarter of 2003 was $13.5 million, an increase of $0.4 million from depreciation in the second quarter of 2002 of $13.1 million. Operating expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2003 were $120.9 million, an increase of $22.0 million over the first six months of 2002. Operating, general and administrative expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2003 were $93.8 million, an increase of $18.2 million over the first six months of 2002. The January 2003 results of our Montana operations contributed approximately $13.5 million of this increase. In addition, our Montana and South Dakota operations experienced an increase in operating, general and administrative expenses of $1.2 million and $3.5 million, respectively, primarily due to increased legal and employee benefit costs. Depreciation for the six months ended June 30, 2003 was $27.1 million, an increase of $3.8 million over depreciation for the six months ended June 30, 2002.
Operating income in the second quarter of 2003 was $24.9 million, an increase of $3.8 million, or 18.0%, from $21.1 million in the second quarter of 2002. The increase was primarily attributable to higher gross margins as discussed above. For the six months ended June 30, 2003, operating income was $56.4 million, an increase of $10.6 million from $45.8 million in the six months ended June 30, 2002. The January 2003 results of our Montana operations contributed approximately $8.1 million of this increase. The remaining increase was primarily due to higher gross margins offset by increased legal and employee benefit costs.
35
NATURAL GAS UTILITY SEGMENT OPERATIONS
Revenues in the second quarter of 2003 were $71.0 million, an increase of $17.8 million, or 33.5%, from results in the second quarter of 2002. Our Montana operations revenues increased $13.2 million due to increased gas supply costs. The increase was offset by a $2.7 million decrease due to a 46% decline in volumes as a result of warmer weather in Montana service territories. Revenues from our South Dakota and Nebraska operations increased $7.2 million, consisting of a $6.6 million increase in wholesale revenues and a $700,000 increase in retail revenues. The wholesale operations increase was due primarily to a 5.8% increase in volumes and 16% higher gas prices in Nebraska. Retail revenues increased due to 43% higher gas prices in South Dakota, offset by a 6.7% decrease in volumes. For the six months ended June 30, 2003, revenues were $188.9 million, or $57.4 million higher than revenues for the first six months of 2002 of $131.5 million. The January 2003 results of our Montana operations contributed approximately $20.4 million of this increase. Montana revenues for February through June 2003, as compared to the same period in 2002, increased $20.3 million due to a $23.2 million, or 155.8%, increase in gas supply costs partially offset by a $2.9 million decrease in revenues caused by a weather-related decrease in volumes. The gas supply costs are also included in cost of sales, thereby having no impact on gross margin. Revenues from our South Dakota and Nebraska operations increased $16.8 million, consisting of a $9.8 million increase in wholesale revenues and a $7.0 million increase in retail revenues. Wholesale revenues increased due primarily to the addition of ethanol plant customers, an increase in volumes, and higher gas prices in Nebraska. South Dakota retail revenues increased due to an increase in gas prices and an increase in volumes.
Cost of sales in the second quarter of 2003 was $52.5 million, an increase of $25.5 million, or 94.3%, from results in the second quarter of 2002. Gas supply costs in Montana increased $19.4 million, including a $6.2 million write-off as a result of a July 3, 2003 order from the MPSC disallowing the recovery of certain gas supply costs. The MPSC also rejected a motion for reconsideration filed by us. We filed suit in district court on July 28, 2003 seeking to overturn the MPSC's decision to disallow recovery of these costs. In addition, the MPSC granted an interim order on July 3, 2003 for the projected gas cost adjusted for a portion of the gas portfolio at a fixed price of $3.50 per MMbtu as opposed to the market price submitted in the original filing, which was higher. Assuming our average forecast price over the next twelve months occurs, the disallowance on the volumes at the imputed price compared to market price would be approximately $6 million for the period July 1, 2003, through June 30, 2004. Wholesale gas supply costs within our Nebraska operations increased $6.1 million as a result of higher daily gas prices and increased volumes. For the six months ended June 30, 2003, cost of sales was $129.7 million, an increase of $54.8 million as compared to the first six months of 2002. The January 2003 results of our Montana operations contributed approximately $9.5 million of this increase. Gas supply costs in Montana for February through June of 2003, as compared to 2002, increased $29.3 million, including $6.2 million as discussed above. Gas supply costs within our South Dakota and Nebraska operations increased $15.9 million as a result of higher wholesale and retail volumes and gas prices.
Gross margin in the second quarter of 2003 was $18.5 million, a decrease of $7.7 million, or 29.2%, compared to the second quarter of 2002. Montana operations decreased $8.8 million as a result of the MPSC order on the $6.2 million disallowance of gas supply costs and the volume decrease discussed above. This decrease was partially offset by a $1.2 million increase in gross margins by our South Dakota and Nebraska operations as a result of higher volumes and gas prices. As a percentage of revenues, gross margin decreased to 26.1% in the second quarter of 2003 from 49.2% in the second quarter of 2002. Gross margin as a percentage of revenue is impacted by the fluctuations that occur in retail costs, which are collected from customers through rates. Margins for the six months ended June 30, 2003 were $59.2 million, or $2.7 million higher than the first six months of 2002. The January 2003 results of our Montana operations contributed approximately $10.6 million of this increase. Montana operations for February through June of 2003, as compared to 2002, decreased
36
$9.1 million as a result of the MPSC order on the $6.2 million disallowance of gas supply costs and the $2.9 million decrease in retail volumes discussed above. South Dakota and Nebraska contributed approximately $0.9 million to the increased gross margins as a result of higher volumes and gas prices. As with the quarter, margin percentages decreased from 43.0% for the first six months of 2002 to 31.3% for the first six months of 2003.
Operating expenses in the second quarter of 2003 were $17.6 million, a decrease of $0.6 million, or 3.8%, from results in the second quarter of 2002. Operating, general and administrative expenses decreased $1.0 million due to operating efficiency measures instituted to counter decreased margins. Depreciation expense increased $0.4 million from depreciation in the second quarter of 2002 of $3.1 million. Operating expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2003 were $37.0 million, an increase of $6.0 million, or 19.3%, from results in the first six months of 2002. The January 2003 results of our Montana operations contributed approximately $4.5 million of this increase. Operating, general and administrative expenses increased $4.6 million due to increased employee benefit costs. Depreciation expense increased $1.4 million over depreciation for the six months ended June 30, 2002.
Operating income in the second quarter of 2003 was $0.9 million, compared to $7.9 million in the second quarter of 2002. The decrease was mainly the result of the MPSC order disallowing $6.2 million of gas supply costs combined with retail volume decreases in Montana and increased depreciation. For the six months ended June 30, 2003, operating income of $22.2 million was $3.3 million less than operating income for the six months ended June 30, 2002. The January 2003 results of our Montana operations contributed an increase of approximately $6.4 million, which was offset by the MPSC order disallowing $6.2 million of gas supply costs, decreased retail volumes in Montana and increased operating expenses.
ALL OTHER OPERATIONS
All Other primarily consists of our other miscellaneous service activities, which are not included in the other identified segments, together with the unallocated corporate costs and investments, and any reconciling or eliminating amounts. The miscellaneous service activities principally include non-utility businesses engaged in voice and data networks and systems, and a portfolio of services to residential and business customers, including product sales and maintenance contracts in areas such as home monitoring devices and appliances.
Revenues in the second quarter of 2003 were $2.1 million, an increase of $0.4 million from results in the second quarter of 2002. For the six months ended June 30, 2003, revenues were $4.7 million, an increase of $2.3 million from revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2002. These increases are due primarily to the addition of non-utility operations acquired with the Montana operations.
Cost of sales in the second quarter of 2003 was $0.7 million, an increase of $0.3 million from results in the second quarter of 2002. Cost of sales for the six months ended June 2003 were $1.4 million, an increase of $1.0 million as compared to cost of sales for the first six months of 2002. These increases are due to the addition of non-utility operations acquired with the Montana operations.
Gross margin in the second quarter of 2003 was $1.4 million, which was consistent with gross margin in the second quarter of 2002. For the six months ended June 30, 2003, margins of $3.3 million were $1.3 million higher than margins for the six months ended June 30, 2002 due primarily to the addition of non-utility operations acquired with the Montana operations.
Operating expenses in the second quarter of 2003 were $25.9 million, an increase of $23.2 million over results in the second quarter of 2002. This increase was primarily due to a $12.4 million impairment charge on our Montana First Megawatts generation project, and an increase in operating, general and administrative costs of $9.6 million related to increased legal and professional fees expense. Operating expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2003, were $37.6 million as compared to
37
$7.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002. This increase was due primarily to the $12.4 million impairment charge and a $15.2 million increase in professional fees as discussed above. Annual premium requirements for directors and officers liability insurance increased significantly beginning in June 2003, and as a result we expect general and administrative expenses to increase by approximately $2.0 million per quarter related to this matter.
Operating losses were $24.5 million in the second quarter of 2003, an increase of $23.1 million from losses of $1.4 million in the second quarter of 2002, due to the impairment charges and professional fees discussed above. For the six months ended June 30, 2003, operating losses were $34.3 million, an increase of $28.8 million from losses of $5.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002, due to the impairment charges and professional fees discussed above.
DISCONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS SEGMENT OPERATIONS
We have engaged a financial advisor to assist us in negotiating the sale of Expanets and we have committed to a plan to sell our interest in Expanets within the next twelve months. Following is a summary of operations of Expanets for the periods presented (in thousands).
|
Three months ended |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
June 30, 2003 |
June 30, 2002 |
|||||
Revenues | $ | 162,061 | $ | 191,354 | |||
Loss from operations before income taxes and minority interests | (6,765 | ) | (18,580 | ) | |||
Minority interests | | | |||||
Income tax benefit (provision) | (113 | ) | 7,426 | ||||
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes and minority interests | $ | (6,878 | ) | $ | (11,154 | ) | |
|
Six months ended |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
June 30, 2003 |
June 30, 2002 |
|||||
Revenues | $ | 328,667 | $ | 370,642 | |||
Income (Loss) from operations before income taxes and minority interests | 14,355 | (45,754 | ) | ||||
Minority Interests | | 11,152 | |||||
Income tax benefit (provision) | (253 | ) | 17,571 | ||||
Income (Loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes and minority interests | $ | 14,102 | $ | (17,031 | ) | ||
Expanets income from operations before income taxes and minority interests for the six months ended June 30, 2003 includes a gain on debt extinguishment of $27.3 million resulting from a settlement with Avaya in March 2003.
DISCONTINUED HVAC SEGMENT OPERATIONS
We have engaged a financial advisor to assist us in negotiating the sale of Blue Dot, and we have committed to a plan to sell our interest in Blue Dot within the next twelve months. The operating results for the three and six months ending June 30, 2003 reflect the results of operations of 18 sold
38
locations through the date of sale. Following is a summary of operations of Blue Dot for the periods presented (dollars in thousands).
|
Three months ended |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
June 30, 2003 |
June 30, 2002 |
|||||
Revenues | $ | 115,046 | $ | 117,775 | |||
Income (Loss) from operations before income taxes and minority interests | 2,882 | 1,417 | |||||
Minority interests | | | |||||
Income tax benefit (provision) | (296 | ) | (580 | ) | |||
Income (Loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes | $ | 2,586 | $ | 837 | |||
|
Six months ended |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
June 30, 2003 |
June 30, 2002 |
|||||
Revenues | $ | 226,241 | $ | 212,258 | |||
Loss from operations before income taxes and minority interests | (1,366 | ) | (2,737 | ) | |||
Minority interests | | 3,762 | |||||
Income tax benefit (provision) | (591 | ) | 916 | ||||
Income (Loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes | $ | (1,957 | ) | $ | 1,941 | ||
LIQUIDITY & CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash Flow and Cash Position
Our financial condition has been significantly and negatively affected by the poor performance of our non-energy businesses and our significant indebtedness. If we are unable to generate cash from additional funding sources or proceeds from the sale of non-core assets, then the amount of cash currently being generated from our continuing operation may not be sufficient to sustain current and anticipated interest payments, capital expenditures and working capital requirements, which have risen significantly due to reductions in trade credit demanded by our vendors, additional professional and other fees related to our turnaround plan and certain stockholder and derivative litigation. Our ability to obtain additional funding sources, or proceeds from the sale of non-core assets is critical to our short-term liquidity. Interest obligations of approximately $39 million are due in September with respect to our outstanding indebtedness. We have the ability to defer $31 million due on September 15, with respect to our outstanding senior unsecured notes payable, for up to thirty days. We also owe approximately $38 million in property taxes in Montana, which are due by the end of November. At present we have no ability to access equity markets and no new bank lines to supplement our working capital and must rely on our cash balances to cover shortfalls. We are currently seeking a working capital facility, however there are no assurances that we will be able to consummate this or any similar financing. If we are unable to obtain funds to addresss our immediate liquidity needs, or to effectuate our turnaround plan, which will require significantly reducing our debt, restructuring our debt and generating cash from additional funding sources or proceeds from the sale of non-core assets, then we may be required to seek protection under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. We cannot predict when a Bankruptcy filing, if any, would be made, but it could occur in the near term. If we file for such protection, our creditors will be paid prior to our stockholders. In addition, if we file for bankruptcy protection, our stockholders may lose their entire investment.
39
We have eliminated the dividend on our common stock and elected to defer distributions on the publicly traded trust preferred securities of our subsidiary trusts. However, distributions on the publicly traded trust preferred securities of our subsidiary trusts continue to accumulate on the trust preferred securities at the applicable annual rate, to the extent permitted by law and must be paid before we can pay dividends to our common stockholders.
Due to the sharp declines in the United States equity markets since the third quarter of 2000, the value of our pension plan assets has decreased significantly. We estimate contributions of approximately $24 million and $30 million will be required in 2004 and 2005, respectively, based on current market conditions.
As of June 30, 2003, cash and cash equivalents were $50.5 million, compared to $26.6 million at December 31, 2002. The increase in cash is principally the result of the net proceeds received from the closing of our new senior secured term loan in February 2003, net of other debt principal payments and working capital needs.
Cash flows used in continuing operations during the six months ended June 30, 2003 were $86.3 million compared to cash provided by continuing operations of $106.8 million during the six months ended June 30, 2002. Cash used in operating activities was composed primarily of net loss of $32.9 million adjusted for non-cash items of $43.8 million offset by cash used due to changes in operating assets and liabilities of $97.2 million. Due in part to recent downgrades of our credit ratings, we have experienced reduced vendor credit terms which have contributed to the $59.3 million cash used by changes in operating assets and liabilities. Absent significant progress against our turnaround plan, further credit restrictions and resulting uses of cash due to negative changes in operating assets and liabilities are likely.
Cash flows provided by investing activities were $27.6 million in the first six months of 2003 compared to cash used of $555.0 million in the first six months of 2002. The change was principally due to the acquisition of our Montana operations during 2002, which accounted for approximately $502.8 million. Cash flows provided by financing activities were $86.2 million in the first six months of 2003 compared to $645.4 million in the first six months of 2002. In the first six months of 2003 we received proceeds of $390.0 million under a new senior secured term loan, which was used to repay $255.0 million on our credit facility. In the first six months of 2002, we received proceeds of $720.0 million from the issuance of senior notes, which was used to acquire our Montana operations and repay existing debt.
In June 2003, Expanets closed on a two-year, $25 million secured line of credit with a financial institution for working capital purposes. The line of credit is secured by accounts receivable and has a borrowing base equal to 75% of eligible accounts receivable minus reserves. As of June 30, 2003, Expanets has an available borrowing capacity of approximately $5.7 million. In July 2003, Expanets utilized $3.5 million of capacity under this line of credit to post letters of credits with suppliers. As of August 13, 2003, Expanets has an available borrowing capacity of approximately $10 million, however Expanets' borrowing capacity fluctuates daily based on billings and cash receipts.
Expanets has a note payable to Avaya with payments of approximately $9 million due in January, April and July of 2004, and an outstanding balance of $27.1 million as of June 30, 2003. The note bears interest at 15% per annum. Amounts repaid under this facility may not be reborrowed. Expanets may need to obtain funding to repay or replace this note as it becomes due. If Expanets defaults under their credit facility with Avaya, we may be obligated to purchase inventory and accounts from Avaya in an amount equal to the outstanding balance of approximately $27.1 million.
On June 6, 2003, Blue Dot entered into a forbearance agreement with its credit facility provider. The forbearance agreement, which expires on August 29, 2003, contains certain covenants including information updates related to the potential sale of Blue Dot, certain limitations on disbursements, and certain minimum thresholds for receipts. Blue Dot has begun discussions with its credit facility provider regarding the circumstances and conditions under which its forbearance agreement could be extended, although no assurances can be given that its credit facility provider will extend the term of the forbearance period. At June 30, 2003, the amount outstanding under this facility was $18.9 million, and the bank was holding restricted cash from Blue Dot in the amount of $3.5 million.
40
At June 30, 2003, we had a common stockholders' deficit of $503.9 million and currently have approximately $2.2 billion in debt and trust preferred instruments outstanding. As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, we have reclassified approximately $1.2 billion of long-term debt to current. The following table shows our contractual cash obligations and commercial commitments as of June 30, 2003 without regard to the $1.2 billion reclassification of long-term debt to current:
Commitments |
Total |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
Thereafter |
|||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
(in thousands) |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Debt: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Senior Unsecured Notes, 77/8% and 83/4% | $ | 720,000 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 250,000 | $ | 470,000 | ||||||||
Senior Unsecured Debt, 6.95% | 105,000 | | | | | | 105,000 | |||||||||||||||
Senior Secured Term Loan(1) | 388,050 | 1,950 | 3,900 | 3,900 | 378,300 | | | |||||||||||||||
South Dakota Mortgage Bonds, 7.00% and 7.10% | 115,000 | | | 60,000 | | | 55,000 | |||||||||||||||
South Dakota Pollution Control Obligations, 5.85% and 5.90% | 21,350 | | | | | | 21,350 | |||||||||||||||
Montana First Mortgage Bonds, 7.00%, 7.30%, 8.25% and 8.95% | 157,197 | | | 5,386 | 150,000 | 365 | 1,446 | |||||||||||||||
Discount on Montana First Mortgage Bonds | (3,817 | ) | | | | | | (3,817 | ) | |||||||||||||
Montana Pollution Control Obligations, 6.125% and 5.90% | 170,205 | | | | | | 170,205 | |||||||||||||||
Montana Secured Medium Term Notes, 7.23% and 7.25% | 13,000 | | | | | | 13,000 | |||||||||||||||
Montana Unsecured Medium Term Notes, 7.07%, 7.96% and 7.875% | 40,000 | | | | 15,000 | | 25,000 | |||||||||||||||
Montana Natural Gas Transition Bonds, 6.20% | 48,318 | 1,816 | 4,052 | 4,744 | 4,712 | 5,248 | 27,746 | |||||||||||||||
Other debt, various | 1,123 | | 321 | 343 | 221 | 238 | | |||||||||||||||
Capital leases(2) | 11,784 | 1,558 | 3,022 | 1,650 | 1,508 | 1,122 | 2,924 | |||||||||||||||
Total Debt | 1,787,210 | 5,324 | 11,295 | 76,023 | 549,741 | 256,973 | 887,854 | |||||||||||||||
Mandatorily Redeemable Preferred Securities of Subsidiary Trusts: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
8.125% mandatorily redeemable preferred securities of subsidiary trust | 32,500 | | | | | | 32,500 | |||||||||||||||
7.20% mandatorily redeemable preferred securities of subsidiary trust | 55,000 | | | | | | 55,000 | |||||||||||||||
8.45% mandatorily redeemable preferred securities of subsidiary trust | 65,000 | | | | | | 65,000 | |||||||||||||||
81/4% mandatorily redeemable preferred securities of subsidiary trust | 106,750 | | | | | | 106,750 | |||||||||||||||
8.10% mandatorily redeemable preferred securities of subsidiary trust | 111,000 | | | | | | 111,000 | |||||||||||||||
Total Mandatorily Redeemable Preferred Securities of Subsidiary Trusts: | 370,250 | | | | | | 370,250 | |||||||||||||||
Future minimum operating lease payments(3) | 227,089 | 388 | 32,595 | 32,572 | 32,527 | 32,287 | 96,720 | |||||||||||||||
Qualifying Facilities(4) | 428,155 | 9,549 | 10,171 | 3,932 | 5,787 | 7,412 | 391,304 | |||||||||||||||
Power Purchase Contracts(5) | 1,567,035 | 136,383 | 270,797 | 236,238 | 194,583 | 126,891 | 602,143 | |||||||||||||||
Interest payments on existing debt and preferred securities | 2,065,502 | 70,985 | 171,110 | 169,270 | 161,771 | 108,540 | 1,383,826 | |||||||||||||||
Total Commitments(6) | $ | 6,445,241 | $ | 222,629 | $ | 495,968 | $ | 518,035 | $ | 944,409 | $ | 532,103 | $ | 3,732,097 | ||||||||
41
Each of the debt agreements, mandatorily redeemable preferred securities of subsidiary trust and capital and operating leases described in the above-referenced table, as well as other contractual obligations including the Blue Dot exchange agreements and the obligations under the Defined Benefit Pension and Postretirement Benefit Plan are described under the caption "Description of Indebtedness and Other Contractual Obligations" in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Performance Bonds
Expanets has various performance bonds and guarantees in place to cover the installation of equipment and inventory purchases. The maximum potential payout under these performance bonds is $16.6 million and $49.9 million as of June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively.
In May 2003 a vendor of Expanets presented a claim against a performance bond. We advanced $10 million in satisfaction of this claim pursuant to a previously existing indemnity agreement supporting the performance bond. Expanets has not yet made repayments on the advance. Expanets has located and is using alternative supply sources.
Blue Dot has various license, bid and performance bonds in place to secure the performance of contracts and the adequate provision of services. The maximum potential payout under these performance bonds is $9.6 million and $14.3 million as of June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively.
We have issued indemnity agreements that support the outstanding performance bonds of Expanets and Blue Dot.
Letters of Credit
We have various letter of credit requirements and other collateral obligations of approximately $21.1 million and $48.1 million as of June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively. Approximately $9 million and $18.6 million of these obligations as of June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively, serve to support performance bonds primarily related to Expanets and Blue Dot. In addition, included in restricted cash at June 30, 2003 is $7.1 million that supports performance bonds related to Expanets and Blue Dot. No such amounts existed at December 31, 2002.
Other Contractual Obligations
On June 19, 2002, NorthWestern Energy Marketing, LLC (NEM), our power marketing subsidiary, entered into two five-year power supply contracts to supply a total of approximately 20 megawatts of electricity to customers located in Montana. These supply obligations commenced on July 1, 2002 and continue through June 30, 2007. NEM secured supply to cover these contractual obligations through June 30, 2003. Due to our financial condition, NEM has been unable to secure a source of power to cover its contractual obligation subsequent to June 30, 2003. Upon notification, NEM's two customers
42
immediately covered their supply need by becoming customers served by the default supply provider. NEM's estimated maximum exposure over the remaining term of the contracts based on current and projected default supply prices is approximately $3.9 million. NEM is currently involved in settlement discussions with its two customers.
Blue Dot and Expanets, in making certain of their business acquisitions, issued equity in various classes and series to the former owners of such businesses. In connection with those issuances, in certain cases, Blue Dot and Expanets entered into agreements providing exchange or put rights giving the security holders certain rights related to those shares. NorthWestern Growth Corporation entered into agreements with Blue Dot and Expanets under which it agreed to support obligations related to the exercise of the exchange or put rights in certain of the underlying agreements. Blue Dot and Expanets have requested that NorthWestern Growth Corporation provide funds necessary to perform their obligations under those agreements. NorthWestern has indicated that it believes its obligations with respect to Expanets' instruments have expired and that, in any event, no additional funds will be provided while NorthWestern pursues the sale or disposition of those businesses or their assets. The maximum aggregate amount of payments that may be required of NorthWestern under the various Expanets agreements is $4.3 million as of June 30, 2003.
Blue Dot has defaulted on certain equity redemption obligations totaling $7.7 million with respect to shares issued to the former owners of four separate businesses or their affiliates. Blue Dot entered into agreements whereby Blue Dot sold two of these business back to the original owners or their affiliates in two transactions that resulted in the return of shares issued to the former owners of these businesses or their affiliates, the termination of the outstanding equity redemption obligations associated with these shares, and net cash proceeds of $1.8 million to Blue Dot. Blue Dot has entered into certain pending agreements for the sale of the remaining two businesses to the original owners or their affiliates, subject to Blue Dot board of director approval and consent from Blue Dot's credit facility provider, which will result in the return of shares issued to the former owners of these businesses or their affiliates, the termination of the outstanding equity redemption obligations associated with these shares, and the payment of approximately $200,000 cash proceeds to Blue Dot. The maximum aggregate amount of payments that may be required of NorthWestern under the various Blue Dot agreements is approximately $22.4 million as of June 30, 2003, of which approximately $6.7 million may be required within the next twelve months.
NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
See Note 12 for a discussion of new accounting standards.
RISK FACTORS
You should carefully consider the risk factors described below, as well as other information included in this Quarterly Report, before making an investment in our common stock or other securities. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones facing us. This risk factors section has been updated to the date of this Quarterly Report. For additional information relating to our turnaround plan, liquidity, capital requirements and other matters relating to NorthWestern, please refer to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known or that we currently believe to be less significant may also adversely affect us.
If we are unable to address our immediate liquidity needs, we may have to seek protection from our creditors under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.
We face significant and immediate liquidity challenges that are materially and adversely affecting our ability to fund our operations and service our substantial indebtedness. If we are unable to address these challenges or to effectuate our turnaround plan, which will require significantly reducing our debt, restructuring our debt and generating cash from additional funding sources or proceeds from the
43
sale of non core assets, then we may default on certain covenants under our instruments governing our indebtedness, including our credit agreement, and we may be required to seek protection under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. We can not predict when a Bankruptcy filing, if any, would be made, but it could occur in the near term. If we file for such protection, our creditors will be paid prior to our stockholders. In addition, if we file for bankruptcy protection, the market for our common stock may no longer exist and our stockholders could lose their entire investment.
We have substantial indebtedness, which has adversely affected our financial condition; substantially reducing our indebtedness is critical to our ability to continue to fund our operations.
We had total consolidated indebtedness, including indebtedness with respect to mandatorily redeemable preferred securities of subsidiary trusts, of approximately $2.2 billion outstanding as of June 30, 2003. As our ability to meet these obligations is uncertain, we have reclassified approximately $1.2 billion of long-term debt to current maturities of long-term debt on our consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2003.
This indebtedness has had and continues to have important consequences to you. For example, it has
If we are unable to generate cash from additional funding sources or proceeds from the sale of non-core assets, then the amount of cash being generated from our continuing operations may not be sufficient to sustain current and anticipated interest payments, capital expenditures and working capital requirements, which have risen significantly due to reductions in trade credit demanded by our vendors, additional professional and other fees related to our turnaround plan and certain stockholder and derivative litigation. Interest obligations of approximately $39 million are due in September with respect to our outstanding indebtedness. We have the ability to defer $31 million due on September 15, with respect to our outstanding senior unsecured notes payable, for up to thirty days. We also owe approximately $38 million in property taxes in Montana, which are due by the end of November. Commencing in 2005, we face substantial debt reduction payments. If we are unable to generate cash from additional funding sources or proceeds from the sale of non-core assets, we will not be able to meet these obligations as they come due. At present we have no ability to access equity markets and no new bank lines to supplement our working capital and must rely on our cash balances to cover shortfalls.
If we are unable to significantly reduce our debt, restructure our debt or obtain additional capital, then our ability to fund our operations and service our substantial indebtedness will be materially adversely affected, we may default on certain covenants under the instruments governing our indebtedness, including our credit agreement. Failure to comply with any of the covenants contained in the instruments governing our indebtedness could result in an event of default which, if not cured or waived, could result in the acceleration of other outstanding indebtedness. We may not have sufficient working capital to satisfy our debt obligations in the event of an acceleration of all or a significant portion of our outstanding indebtedness. Therefore, if we are unable to significantly reduce or
44
restructure our debt, we may be required to pursue alternate means of resolving our financial problems, which could include seeking protection under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.
Our ability to implement our turnaround plan is subject to many impediments and uncertainties. A failure to completely implement our turnaround plan will have a material adverse affect on our results of operations and liquidity.
Management is implementing a turnaround plan that includes these principal elements:
Absent proceeds from the sale of non-core assets or significant improvements in the operating results of our non-energy businesses, we will not have the ability to materially reduce our debt. Therefore, our ability to implement this plan is subject to many impediments and uncertainties including:
The success of our turnaround plan is dependent upon reducing our debt. Absent the receipt of significant proceeds from the sale of non-core assets, the raising of additional capital and a restructuring of our debt, we will not have the ability to reduce our debt or meet our maturing debt obligations. Even if we are successful in selling some or all of our non-core assets, we will have to restructure our debt or seek new capital prior to these debt maturities. If our cash requirements substantially increase or we encounter adverse developments in our operations, our liquidity and ability to implement our turnaround plan will be adversely affected. Our senior secured term loan contains restrictions on the sale or disposition of assets, including non-core assets, and on the prepayment of the senior secured term loan and other indebtedness. Therefore, even if we are able to generate funds through the sale of non-core assets or equity, or cash flow from operations, we may not be able to prepay any of the debt in a timely manner.
If our stockholders do not approve the proposed amendment of our charter documents at the 2003 annual meeting, we will not be able to effectuate our turnaround plan.
The ability to substantially reduce our debt is the key to the success of our turnaround plan. In addition to the sale of non-core assets and other steps we have taken and will take to improve operating performance and preserve cash, we believe that reduction of debt will require the issuance of additional equity securities, either to raise cash or to exchange for the retirement of outstanding debt. We are asking that our stockholders approve, at our annual meeting scheduled for August 26, 2003, a significant increase in the number of shares of authorized common stock, a significant increase in the number of shares of preferred stock and a significant amendment of preferred stock terms, together with other changes to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation, in order to provide us with greater flexibility in pursuing our turnaround plan. We believe that, unless a new Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation is adopted, we will not be able to effectuate our turnaround plan.
45
We will need significant additional capital to refinance our indebtedness as it matures. If we cannot sell sufficient assets or borrow new indebtedness sufficient to repay our indebtedness as it matures in future periods, our ability to fund our operations and service our substantial indebtedness will be adversely affected, and we will default on such maturing indebtedness as well as all other indebtedness that is cross-defaulted to such indebtedness thereby materially and adversely affecting our financial condition and results of operations.
We will be required to obtain significant additional capital to meet debt obligations maturing in 2005 and beyond. Absent proceeds from the sale of non-core assets or significant improvements in the operating results of our non-energy businesses, which historically have not been cash flow contributors, we will have limited ability to reduce our debt. To the extent we do not sell sufficient assets to pay down debt as it matures, we will need to borrow money. The market for indebtedness is volatile and our ability to raise capital is dependent on a number of factors including our creditworthiness, legal proceedings we are and may be involved in, the ratings of our indebtedness, the cash flow we have available to service the interest expense relating to any new borrowings, and our ability to implement our turnaround. If we are unable to refinance our indebtedness as it matures we will default on such indebtedness and all other indebtedness that is cross-defaulted to such indebtedness. Blue Dot is currently in a forbearance period under its credit agreement that will end August 29, 2003. If Blue Dot defaults again or other defaults by any of our subsidiaries occur under applicable debt instruments, then such entity could seek protection under the bankruptcy law, or its creditors could institute involuntary proceedings against such entities, and we could lose our remaining investment in such entity. Any default by us on our indebtedness will have a material and adverse affect on our financial condition and results of operations.
If we are unable to generate cash from additional funding sources or proceeds from the sale of non-core assets, then the amount of cash currently being generated from our continuing operations may not be sufficient to sustain current and anticipated interest expense, capital expenditures and working capital requirements, which have risen significantly due to reductions in trade credit demanded by our vendors, additional professional and other fees related to our turnaround plan and certain stockholder and derivative litigation. If we cannot obtain additional capital to meet such obligations, we will default on such indebtedness and all other indebtedness that is cross-defaulted to such indebtedness, including our credit agreement and we may be required to pursue alternate means of resolving our financial problems, which could include seeking protection under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.
If our common shares and the publicly traded trust preferred securities of our subsidiary trusts are delisted by the New York Stock Exchange, such stockholders' ability to sell their shares would be materially harmed.
Our common shares are listed on the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") under the symbol "NOR". There are a number of continuing requirements that must be satisfied in order for a company's stock to remain eligible for quotation on the NYSE. These requirements include maintaining a total market capitalization of not less than $50 million over a 30 day trading period and shareholders' equity of not less than $50 million and an average closing price of not less than $1.00 over a consecutive 30 day period. While we are currently in compliance with these requirements, our common stock has recently traded at levels below $1.00 and, as a result, our total market capitalization has recently dropped below $50 million. Unless the market price of our common stock, and our total market capitalization, increases significantly in time to satisfy the applicable NYSE listing requirements, we could become subject to a delisting proceeding by the NYSE. In addition, publicly traded trust preferred securities of our subsidiary trusts are also listed on the NYSE. If our common shares become subject to delisting proceedings by the NYSE, it is likely that the trust preferred securities of our subsidiary trusts would also become subject to similar proceedings.
If we fail to satisfy the continued listing requirements of the NYSE, our common shares, as well as the trust preferred securities of our subsidiary trusts, may be subject to suspension or delisting. The
46
delisting of such shares from the NYSE could have a material adverse effect on the market price of, and the liquidity of the trading market for, such shares. Delisting could also reduce the ability of holders of such shares to purchase or sell shares as quickly and as efficiently as they have done historically. This lack of liquidity would make it more difficult for us to raise capital in the future or to use our common shares to extinguish all or part of our debt. Each of these events could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results. We anticipate that if our common shares or the trust preferred securities of our subsidiary trusts are delisted from NYSE, we may seek to trade on another exchange or through a quotation system or in the pink sheets maintained by the National Quotation Bureau, Inc., but there can be no assurance that we would be successful in such efforts or that a trading market in such shares will thereafter develop.
In addition, if our subsidiary trusts are dissolved, the holders of preferred securities issued by such trusts will receive a distribution of our debentures, which are not currently listed on the NYSE. Although we have an obligation to attempt to list such securities on the NYSE, we can provide no assurances that we would be successful in such efforts, particularly if our common stock is then delisted.
Our internal controls and procedures need to be improved.
We have advised our Audit Committee that, in the course of preparing our financial statements for the period ended June 30, 2003,we noted continuing deficiencies in internal controls relating to:
These weaknesses led to the restatement of our financial statements for the first three quarters of 2002. In addition, we have experienced weaknesses in procedures and documentation relating to intercompany transactions, including lapses in documenting loans or advances to our subsidiaries, which could adversely affect our ability to collect such amounts and could force us to subordinate the collection of such amounts in certain circumstances. If we are unable to substantially improve our internal controls, our ability to report our financial results on a timely and accurate basis will continue to be adversely affected which could have a substantial adverse affect on our ability to operate our business.
We are one of several defendants in a class action lawsuit brought in connection with sale of generating and energy-related assets by The Montana Power Company. If we do not successfully resolve this lawsuit, the insurance coverage does not pay for any damages we are found liable for, or our indemnification claims against TouchAmerica Holdings, Inc. cannot be enforced and reimbursed, our business will be harmed and there will be material adverse impact on our financial condition.
We are one of several defendants in a class action lawsuit entitled McGreevey, et al. v. The Montana Power Company, et al., now pending in federal court in Montana. The lawsuit, which was filed by the former shareholders of The Montana Power Company (most of whom became shareholders of Touch America Holdings, Inc. as a result of a corporate reorganization of The Montana Power Company), claims that the disposition of various generating and energy-related assets by The Montana Power Company were void because of the failure to obtain shareholder approval for the transactions. Plaintiffs thus seek to reverse those transactions, or receive fair value for their stock as of late 2001,
47
when plaintiffs claim shareholder approval should have been sought. NorthWestern Corporation is named as a defendant due to the fact that we purchased Montana Power LLC, which plaintiffs claim is a successor to The Montana Power Company. Due to the recent filing by Touch America Holdings, Inc. for bankruptcy protection, the defendants removed the case to federal court, where it now is pending. We intend to vigorously defend against this lawsuit. We cannot currently predict the impact or resolution of this litigation or reasonably estimate a range of possible loss, which could be material. If we do not successfully resolve this lawsuit, the insurance coverage does not pay for any damages we are found liable for, or our indemnification claims against TouchAmerica Holdings, Inc. cannot be enforced and reimbursed, our business will be harmed and there will be a material adverse impact on our financial condition.
The impact of ongoing class action litigation and shareholder derivative actions may be material. We are also subject to the risk of additional litigation and regulatory action in connection with the restatement of our 2002 quarterly financial statements and the potential liability from any such litigation or regulatory action could materially harm our business and may have a material adverse impact on our financial condition.
We, and certain of our present and former officers and directors, have been named in several class action lawsuits and shareholder derivative actions commenced in or removed to federal court. We intend to vigorously defend against these lawsuits. We cannot currently predict the impact or resolution of this litigation or reasonably estimate a range of possible loss, which could be material, and the resolution of these lawsuits may harm our business and have a material adverse impact on our financial condition.
As a result of the restatement of our quarterly results for the first three quarters of 2002 we could become subject to additional shareholder derivative class actions or other securities litigation. In addition, federal, state or local regulatory agencies, such as the SEC, FERC, state public utilities commissions, and/or the New York Stock Exchange, could commence a formal investigation relating to the restatement of our quarterly results. In April 2003, the SEC notified NorthWestern that it is conducting an informal inquiry relating to questions regarding the restatements and other accounting and financial reporting matters. We are cooperating fully with the SEC's informal inquiry and have provided requested information as expeditiously as possible. Other than the informal SEC inquiry, as of the date hereof, we are not aware of any additional litigation or inquiry or investigation having been commenced against us related to these matters, but we cannot predict whether or not any such litigation or regulatory inquiry or investigation will be commenced or, if it is, the outcome of any such litigation or regulatory inquiry or investigation. If any such inquiry or investigation were to result in a regulatory proceeding or action against us, our business and financial condition could be harmed.
The initiation of any additional securities litigation, together with the pending securities and shareholder derivative lawsuits described in this Quarterly Report, has had a material adverse affect on our business and financial condition. Until such inquiries, investigations, proceedings and litigation is resolved, it will be more difficult to raise additional capital or favorably refinance or restructure our debt or other obligations. If an unfavorable result occurred in any such action, our business and financial condition could be further harmed. In addition, we have incurred substantial expenses and are likely to incur additional substantial expenses in connection with such litigation and regulatory inquiries and investigations, including substantial fees for attorneys and other professional advisors. We may also be obligated to indemnify officers and directors named as defendants in such action. These expenses, to the extent not covered by available insurance, have and will continue to adversely affect our cash position.
48
If the MPSC disallows the recovery of the costs incurred in entering into default supply portfolio contracts while we are required to act as the "default supplier," we may not be able to fully recover the costs incurred in procuring default supply contracts, which could adversely affect our net income and financial condition.
The 1997 Montana Restructuring Act, updated by House Bill 509 in 2003, provides that certain customers be able to choose their electricity supplier during a transition period ending on June 30, 2027. NorthWestern Energy is required to act as the "default supplier" for customers who have not chosen an alternate supplier. The Restructuring Act provides for full recovery of prudently incurred costs for procuring a default supply portfolio of electric power. The default supplier was required to propose a "cost recovery mechanism" for electrical supply procurement costs before March 30, 2002. On April 25, 2002, the MPSC approved NorthWestern Energy LLC's proposed "cost recovery mechanism". Annual filings under this mechanism will address the recovery and tracking of all future electric default supply costs.
On June 21, 2002, the MPSC issued a final order approving contracts meeting approximately 60% of the default supply winter peak load and approximately 93% of the annual energy requirements. As a result of the order, NorthWestern Energy has implemented a procurement strategy that involves supplying the remainder of the default supply portfolio through open market purchases. Currently, NorthWestern Energy is making short-term purchases to fill intermediate and peak electricity needs. These short-term purchases, along with the MPSC approved base load supply, are being fully recovered through our annual electricity cost tracking process pursuant to which rates are based on estimated electricity loads and electricity costs for the upcoming tracking period and are annually reviewed and adjusted by the MPSC for any differences in the previous tracking year's estimates to actual information. This process is similar to the cost recovery process that has been utilized for more than 20 years in Montana, South Dakota and other states for natural gas purchases for residential and commercial customers. The MPSC further stated that NorthWestern Energy has an ongoing responsibility to prudently administer its supply contracts and the energy procured pursuant to those contracts for the benefit of ratepayers. The MPSC could, in any particular year, disallow the recovery of a portion of the default supply costs if it makes a determination that NorthWestern Energy acted imprudently with respect to implementation of its open market purchase strategy or that the approved supply contracts were not prudently administered. A failure to recover such costs could adversely affect our net income and financial condition. On July 3, 2003, the MPSC issued an order disallowing the recovery of $6.2 million in gas supply costs. The MPSC also granted an interim order on July 3, 2003 for the projected gas cost adjusted for a portion of the gas portfolio at a fixed price of $3.50 per Mmbtu as opposed to the market price submitted in the original filing, which was higher. Assuming our average forecast price over the next twelve months occurs, the disallowance on the volumes at the imputed price compared to market price would be approximately $6 million for the period July 1, 2003, through June 30, 2004.
We are subject to extensive governmental regulations that could impose significant costs or change rates of our operations and changes in existing regulations and future deregulation may have a detrimental effect on our business and could increase competition.
Our operations and the operations of our subsidiary entities are subject to extensive federal, state and local laws and regulations concerning taxes, service areas, tariffs, issuances of securities, employment, occupational health and safety, protection of the environment and other matters. In addition, we are required to obtain and comply with a wide variety of licenses, permits and other approvals in order to operate our facilities. In the course of complying with these requirements, we may incur significant costs. If we fail to comply with these requirements, we could be subject to civil or criminal liability and the imposition of liens or fines. In addition, existing regulations may be revised or
49
reinterpreted, new laws and regulations may be adopted or become applicable to us or our facilities and future changes in laws and regulations may have a detrimental effect on our business.
Our utility businesses are regulated by certain state commissions, including as of May 30, 2003, the Nebraska Public Service Commission, with regard to our natural gas businesses in that state. As a result, these commissions have the ability to review the regulated utility's books and records. This ability to review our books and records could result in prospective negative adjustments to our rates.
The United States electric utility and natural gas industries are currently experiencing increasing competitive pressures as a result of consumer demands, technological advances, deregulation, greater availability of natural gas-fired generation and other factors. Competition for various aspects of electric and natural gas services is being introduced throughout the country that will open these markets to new providers of some or all of traditional electric utility and natural gas services. Competition is likely to result in the further unbundling of electric utility and natural gas services as has occurred in Montana for electricity and Montana, South Dakota and Nebraska for natural gas. Separate markets may emerge for generation, transmission, distribution, meter reading, billing and other services currently provided by electric utility and natural gas providers as a bundled service. As a result, significant additional competitors could become active in the generation, transmission and distribution segments of our industry.
Proposals have been introduced in Congress to repeal the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935, or PUHCA. To the extent regulatory barriers to entry are eliminated, competitive pressures increase, or the pricing and sale of transmission or distribution services or electricity or fuel assume more characteristics of a commodity business, we could face increased competition adverse to our business.
We may not be able to fully recover transition costs, which could adversely affect our net income and financial condition.
Montana law required the MPSC determine the value of net unmitigable transition costs associated with the transformation of the former The Montana Power Company utility business from a vertically integrated electric service company to a utility providing only default supply and transmission and distribution services. The MPSC was also obligated to set a competitive transition charge, or CTC, to be included in distribution rates to collect those net transition costs. The majority of these transition costs relate to out-of-market power purchase contracts, which run through 2032, that the former owner of NorthWestern Energy L.L.C. was required to enter into with certain "qualifying facilities" as established under the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978. The former owner of NorthWestern Energy L.L.C. estimated the pretax net present value of its transition costs over the approximate 30-year period to be approximately $304.7 million in a filing with the MPSC on October 29, 2001. On January 31, 2002, the MPSC issued an Order establishing a CTC that would recover $244.7 million on a net present value basis. While the CTC is designed to adjust and compensate for future changes in sales volumes or other factors affecting actual cost recoveries, the CTC runs through the year 2029, and therefore, we cannot predict with certainty the actual recovery of transition costs. Changes in the recovery of transition costs could affect our net income and financial condition.
Recent downgrades in our credit rating have negatively affected our ability to access capital; failure to improve our credit ratings or additional downgrades will negatively affect our ability to access capital further.
S&P, Moody's and Fitch recently downgraded their ratings on our senior, unsecured debt to "CC", "Ca" with a negative outlook and "CCC" with a Rating Watch Negative respectively. Credit ratings are dependent on a number of quantitative and qualitative factors. Although we are not aware of any
50
current plans of S&P, Moody's or Fitch to further lower their respective ratings on our debt, we cannot assure you that our credit ratings will not be downgraded if we do not reduce our leverage and improve our liquidity position. Also, S&P, Moody's and Fitch have publicly stated that their negative outlook reflects our high debt burden, poor coverage ratios and potential for further deterioration but also the potential coercive exchange of debt for equity and that if we pursue a forced debt for equity swap, debt ratings will be lowered further. Although none of our debt instruments contain acceleration and repayment provisions in the event of a downgrade in our debt ratings by S&P, Moody's or Fitch, if such a downgrade were to occur, our ability to access the capital markets and utilize trade credit may be adversely affected, and our borrowing costs would increase which would adversely impact our results and condition. We may also be required to provide credit support for certain major purchases (e.g., electricity supply contracts, natural gas supply contracts, etc.). In addition, we would likely be required to pay a higher interest rate in future financings, and our potential pool of investors and funding sources could decrease.
We are subject to risks associated with a changing economic environment.
In general, the financial markets have been weak, and the availability and cost of capital for our business and that of our competitors has been adversely affected. Events such as the bankruptcy of several large energy and telecommunications companies have specifically contributed to this weak environment. Such economic environment, if sustained, could constrain the capital available to our industry and would adversely affect our access to funding for our operations, including the funding necessary to refinance or restructure our substantial indebtedness. In addition, the disruption in the capital markets for the energy and telecommunications industries could adversely impact our ability to realize cash from the sale of non-core assets, including Expanets, Blue Dot, our Colstrip transmission assets, and the Montana First Megawatts project.
Our revenues and results of operations are subject to risks that are beyond our control, including but not limited to future terrorist attacks or related acts of war.
The cost of repairing damage to our facilities due to storms, natural disasters, wars, terrorist acts and other catastrophic events, in excess of reserves established for such repairs, may adversely impact our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. Generation and transmission facilities, in general, have been identified as potential terrorist targets. The occurrence or risk of occurrence of future terrorist activity may impact our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows in unpredictable ways. These actions could also result in adverse changes in the insurance markets and disruptions of power and fuel markets. The availability of insurance covering risks we and our competitors typically insure against may decrease. In addition, the insurance we are able to obtain may have higher deductibles, higher premiums and more restrictive policy terms. In addition, our electric transmission and distribution, electric generation, natural gas distribution and pipeline and gathering facilities could be directly or indirectly harmed by future terrorist activity.
The occurrence or risk of occurrence of future terrorist attacks or related acts of war could also adversely affect the United States economy. A lower level of economic activity could result in a decline in energy consumption, which could adversely affect our revenues and margins and limit our future growth prospects. Also, these risks could cause instability in the financial markets and adversely affect our ability to access capital.
Our operating results may fluctuate on a seasonal and quarterly basis.
Our electric and gas utility business and, to a lesser extent, Blue Dot's HVAC business are seasonal businesses, and weather patterns can have a material impact on their operating performance. Demand for electricity is often greater in the summer and winter months associated with cooling and heating. Because natural gas is heavily used for residential and commercial heating, the demand for this
51
product depends heavily upon weather patterns throughout our market areas, and a significant amount of natural gas revenues are recognized in the first and fourth quarters related to the heating season. Similarly, Blue Dot's business is subject to seasonal variations in certain areas of its service lines, with demand for residential HVAC services generally higher in the second and third quarters. Accordingly, our operations have historically generated less revenues and income when weather conditions are milder in the winter and cooler in the summer. In the event that we experience unusually mild winters or summers in the future, our results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected. In addition, exceptionally hot summer weather could add significantly to working capital needs to fund higher than normal power purchases to meet customer demand for electricity.
There are a number of business challenges Expanets must address during 2003. If Expanets is not able to resolve these issues effectively, its performance will continue to be adversely affected.
Expanets is faced with a number of business challenges that it must address in 2003, including:
Further delays in resolving performance issues of the EXPERT system and the costs of system repairs, or the delays and costs of adopting an alternative information management system, together with the other business challenges faced by Expanets, could have an adverse effect on Expanets' internal controls, financial reporting processes, operations and cash flow and could impede NorthWestern's efforts to pursue strategic alternatives for Expanets, including the sale or disposition of the business or its assets.
52
Our decision to sell Blue Dot and Expanets and the fact that we do not intend to make additional investments in, Blue Dot or Expanets, together with other liquidity issues confronting Blue Dot and Expanets, has materially and adversely affected the operations and value of those entities.
Each of Blue Dot and Expanets has limited cash to meet its obligations and each faces liquidity concerns in the near term. We have previously announced that we will not provide additional funding to either entity. Each of Blue Dot and Expanets will have to locate its own independent source of funds should it require additional financing. If either company is unable to obtain necessary financing or to maintain adequate bonding capacity, it will result in a serious disruption in its business and materially and adversely impair its value. Neither of those companies may have sufficient working capital to satisfy its debt obligations as they mature or in the event of an acceleration of all or a significant portion of its outstanding indebtedness. The liquidity issues faced by Expanets and Blue Dot, together with our stated intention to sell these entities in connection with our turnaround plan, will make it difficult to sell these entities at a favorable price.
In addition, substantial uncertainty and concern may also develop on the part of the employees, suppliers and customers of Blue Dot and Expanets. Existing employees, including key managers, and customers may elect to leave those businesses because of these issues or in anticipation of a sale of the business or its assets, and it may be difficult to attract replacements. In some cases we may not have non-competition agreements or only limited ability to enforce such agreements with respect to such departing employees. Certain key employees of Blue Dot may, in particular, be dissatisfied because of the deferrals of certain incentive compensation payments. Suppliers may elect to eliminate, restrict, reduce or impose more burdensome terms on credit, which would increase Blue Dot's and Expanets' cost of goods and create additional liquidity issues.
Changes in commodity prices and availability of supply may increase our cost of producing and distributing electricity and distributing natural gas or decrease the amount we receive from selling electricity and natural gas, adversely affecting our financial performance and condition.
Our wholesale costs for electricity and natural gas are recovered through various pass-through mechanisms in each of the states we serve. These pass through or cost tracking mechanisms are set based on varying prospective or historic averages, so a rapid increase in supply costs would not be immediately reflected in rates.
Also, to the extent not covered by long-term fixed price purchase contracts, we are exposed to changes in the price and availability of coal because most of our generating capacity is coal-fired. Changes in the cost of coal and changes in the relationship between those costs and the market prices of power may affect our financial results. In addition, natural gas and electricity are commodities; the market price of which can be subject to volatile changes in response to changes in crude oil markets, refinery operations, fuel supply, power plant outages, weather conditions, market supply and prices or other market conditions.
In addition, state regulatory authorities set the rates at which we sell electricity and natural gas, and may modify the costs that we may pass through cost adjustments. As a result, we may not be able to immediately pass on to our retail customers rapid increases in our energy supply costs, which could further reduce our liquidity. For example, an increase in natural gas costs of 50 cents per MMbtu could result in additional expenses ranging from $0.8 million per month in the summer to $2.5 million per month in the winter. Since a majority of our electric costs are covered by fixed price contracts, an increase in wholesale prices of $1 per MWH are estimated to increase costs by approximately $125,000 to $150,000 per month.
We do not own any natural gas reserves and do not own electric generation assets to service our Montana operations. We own interests in generation assets that substantially cover our electric supply requirements in South Dakota. As a result, we are required to procure our entire natural gas supply
53
and all of our Montana electricity supply pursuant to contracts with third party suppliers. In light of this reliance on third party suppliers, we are exposed to certain risks in the event a third party supplier is unable to satisfy its contractual obligation.
We do not intend to pay dividends on our common stock, and our ability to pay dividends on our common stock is limited.
Consistent with our turnaround plan to liquidity and reduce debt, the Board of Directors decided to terminate the historical practice of paying an annual cash dividend. We do not anticipate paying any cash dividends for the foreseeable future.
In addition, we are currently prohibited from paying dividends on our common stock under Delaware law. The Delaware General Corporation Law, or the DGCL, allows us to pay dividends only out of our surplus (as defined and computed in accordance with the provisions of the DGCL) or if we have no such surplus, out of our net profits for the fiscal year in which the dividend is declared and/or the preceding fiscal year. We will be unable to pay dividends on or redeem any of our capital stock until such time as we again have available surplus or net profits.
Our senior credit facility also prohibits the payment of dividends during any period of default under the agreement. To the extent that payment of a cash dividend on our common stock becomes permissible under Delaware law, we would only be able to pay a cash dividend on our common stock to the extent that all required distributions on our mandatorily redeemable preferred securities of trusts has been made.
We have established four wholly owned, special-purpose business trusts, NWPS Capital Financing I, NorthWestern Capital Financing I, NorthWestern Capital Financing II and NorthWestern Capital Financing III, to issue common and preferred securities and hold subordinated debentures that we issue, and The Montana Power Company established Montana Power Capital I (Trust) as a wholly owned business trust to issue common and preferred securities and hold subordinated debentures that it issued. We assumed the obligations of The Montana Power Company under the subordinated debentures that it issued to Montana Power Capital I November 15, 2002. The sole assets of these trusts are the investments in subordinated debentures, which are interest bearing. We have the right, on one or more occasions, to defer interest payments in the subordinated debentures for up to 20 consecutive quarterly periods unless a default under the subordinated debentures has occurred and is continuing. In May 2003, our Board of Directors elected to defer payment of distributions indefinitely. During such period of deferral of interest payments on the subordinated debentures, cash distributions on our trust preferred securities will also be deferred. During any deferral period we will not, with some exceptions, be permitted to pay any dividends or distributions in respect of our capital stock.
Our utility business is subject to extensive environmental regulations and potential environmental liabilities, which could result in significant costs and liabilities.
Our utility business is subject to extensive regulations imposed by federal, state and local government authorities in the ordinary course of operations with regard to the environment, including environmental regulations relating to air and water quality, solid waste disposal and other environmental considerations. Many of these environmental laws and regulations create permit and license requirements and provide for substantial civil and criminal fines which, if imposed, could result in material costs or liabilities. We regularly monitor our operations to prevent adverse environmental impacts and to assess potential environmental liabilities. We may be required to make significant expenditures in connection with the investigation and remediation of alleged or actual spills and the repair and upgrade of our facilities in order to meet future requirements under environmental laws.
Environmental laws and regulations require us to incur certain costs, which could be substantial, to operate existing facilities, construct and operate new facilities, and mitigate or remove the effect of past
54
operations on the environment. Governmental regulations establishing environmental protection standards are continually evolving, and, therefore, the character, scope, cost and availability of the measures we may be required to take to ensure compliance with evolving laws or regulations cannot be predicted. However, we believe that an appropriate amount of costs have been accrued and potential costs related to such environmental regulation and cleanup requirements are timely estimated and recorded. To this extent that our environmental liabilities are greater than our reserves or we are unsuccessful in recovering anticipated insurance proceeds under the relevant policies, our results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.
Certain subsidiaries may be subject to potential rescission rights held by their minority shareholders.
Over the past several years, Expanets and Blue Dot issued shares of their capital stock as part of the consideration offered to owners of various companies that they acquired. None of these shares were registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, in the belief that the issuance of these shares was exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act. It is possible that the exemptions from registration on which Expanets and Blue Dot relied were not available, and that these shares may have been issued in violation of the Securities Act. As a result, the persons who received these shares upon the sale of their companies to Expanets or Blue Dot may have the right to seek recovery from Expanets or Blue Dot damages as prescribed by applicable securities laws.
Expanets may be ordered by the Securities and Exchange Commission or a court to register one or more classes of its capital stock under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and may be unable to do so. As a result, we and/or Expanets may be subject to liability under the Securities Exchange Act and this may materially and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Expanets has not registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, one or more classes of its capital stock issuable pursuant to certain options granted over the past several years. Expanets may be ordered to register one or more classes of stock under the Securities Exchange Act by the Securities and Exchange Commission or a court and be unable to comply or have potential liability with respect to any shares of its capital stock, if any, issued with respect to such options. The failure to comply with any order for registration could subject Expanets and us to liability under the Securities Exchange Act and materially and adversely affect our financial position and results of operations.
If we are required to purchase inventory and receivables from Avaya upon a default by Expanets, we may not have sufficient cash available for the purpose.
In 2004, Expanets will be required to repay its outstanding borrowings from Avaya, which currently total $27.1 million. We have no intention of providing additional funds to Expanets, and are prohibited by the MPSC from making advances of more than $10 million in the aggregate to our non-regulated businesses without their prior consent. If we are unable to sell Expanets in a transaction that includes a release of this obligation to Avaya, we may not have sufficient funds to satisfy this obligation. A default under this obligation could result in a default under our various credit agreements.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are exposed to the impact of market fluctuations associated with commodity prices and interest rates. We have policies and procedures to assist in controlling these market risks and we may utilize derivatives to manage a portion of our risk. Our policy allows the use of derivative instruments as part of an overall energy price and interest rate risk management program to efficiently manage and minimize commodity price interest rate risk. We do not enter into financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes.
55
Interest Rate Risk
We use fixed and variable rate long-term debt to partially finance capital expenditures and mandatory debt retirements. These debt agreements expose us to market risk related to changes in interest rates. We manage this risk by taking advantage of market conditions when timing the placement of long-term or permanent financing. We have historically used interest rate swap agreements to manage a portion of out interest rate risk and may take advantage of such agreements in the future to minimize such risk. As of June 30, 2003, we also have outstanding 14,810,000 shares of mandatorily redeemable preferred securities with various fixed interest rates. All of our debt has fixed interest rates, with the exception of our new senior secured term loan which bears interest at a variable rate tied to the Eurodollar rate, with a minimum floor of 3.0%. As of August 7, 2003, the applicable Eurodollar rate was 1.11%.
Commodity Price Risk
We have no derivative contracts outstanding at June 30, 2003, however, we have an obligation for physical delivery of 123,200 MWh of electricity during July at $50 per MWh. At June 30, 2003, based on the market value of electricity, we have an estimated liability of $123,200 related to this obligation. The fair value of fixed-price commodity contracts is estimated based on market prices of commodities covered by the contracts. The net differential between the prices in each contract and market prices for future periods has been applied to the volumes stipulated in each contract to arrive at an estimated future value.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a) We carried out an evaluation as of June 30, 2003, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"). As a result of this review and evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer determined that, although improvements have been made since the beginning of the calendar quarter, our internal controls continue to require our attention and additional efforts in order to meet our expectations and goals.
We advised the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors that we continue to experience deficiencies in internal controls relating to:
Our independent auditors previously advised the Audit Committee in the course of preparing our year-end 2002 financial statements and in undergoing our 2002 audit that these internal control deficiencies constitute reportable conditions and, collectively, a material weakness as defined in Statement on Auditing Standards No. 60.
With the assistance of our advisors, we continue to evaluate methods to improve our internal controls and procedures. We have taken or plan to take corrective actions, such as the following, as necessary:
56
We have also performed substantial additional procedures designed to ensure that these disclosure and internal control deficiencies did not result in material misstatements in our consolidated financial statements contained in this Quarterly Report and do not result in material misstatements in our future consolidated financial results.
(b) Other than as described above, there have been no significant changes in our internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date we carried out our evaluation.
57
We, and certain of our present and former officers and directors, were named as defendants in numerous complaints purporting to be class actions which were filed in the United States District Court for the District of South Dakota, Southern Division, alleging violations of Sections 11, 12 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. The complaints contained varying allegations, including that the defendants misrepresented and omitted material facts with respect to our 2000, 2001, and 2002 financial results and operations included in its filings with the SEC, press releases, and registration statements and prospectuses disseminated in connection with certain offerings of debt, equity, and trust preferred securities. The complaints seek unspecified compensatory damages, rescission, and attorneys' fees and costs as well as accountants' and experts' fees. In June 2003, the complaints were consolidated in the United States District Court for the District of South Dakota and given the caption In re NorthWestern Corporation Securities Litigation, Case No. 03-4049, and Carpenters Pension Trust for Southern California, Oppenheim Investment Management, LLC, and Richard C. Slump were named as co-lead plaintiffs (the "Lead Plaintiffs"). In July 2003, the Lead Plaintiffs filed a consolidated amended class action complaint naming NorthWestern, NorthWestern Capital Financing II and III, Blue Dot, Expanets, certain of our present and former officers and directors, along with a number of investment banks that participated in the securities offerings. The amended complaint makes many of the same allegations as the pre-consolidated complaints, including that the defendants misrepresented and omitted material facts concerning the business operations and financial performance of NorthWestern, Expanets, Blue Dot and CornerStone, overstated NorthWestern's revenues and earnings by, among other things, maintaining insufficient reserves for accounts receivable at Expanets, failing to disclose billing problems and lapses and data conversion problems, failing to make full disclosures of problems (including the billing and data conversion issues) arising from the implementation of Expanets' EXPERT system, concealing losses at Expanets and Blue Dot by improperly allocating losses to minority interest shareholders, maintaining insufficient internal controls, and profiting from improper related-party transactions. We, and certain of our present and former officers and directors, were also named as defendants in two complaints purporting to be class actions which were filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, entitled Sanford & Beatrice Golman Family Trust, et al. v. NorthWestern Corp., et al., Case No. 03CV3223, and Arthur Laufer v. Merle Lewis, et al., Case No. 03CV3716, which were brought on behalf of the purchasers of our 7.20%, 8.25%, and 8.10% trust preferred securities which were offered and sold pursuant to our registration statement on Form S-3 filed on July 12, 1999. The plaintiffs' claims are based on similar allegations of material misrepresentations and omissions of fact relating to the registration statement in violation of Sections 11 and 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 and they seek unspecified compensatory damages, rescission and attorneys', accountants' and experts' fees. In July 2003, Arthur Laufer v. Merle Lewis, et al. was transferred to the District of South Dakota and consolidated with the consolidated actions pending in that court. We intend to vigorously defend against these lawsuits. We cannot currently predict the impact or resolution of this litigation or reasonably estimate a range of possible loss, which could be material, and the resolution of these lawsuits may harm our business and have a material adverse impact on our financial condition.
Certain of our present and former officers and directors and NorthWestern, as a nominal defendant, have been named in two shareholder derivative actions commenced in the United States District Court for the District of South Dakota, Southern Division, entitled Deryl Lusty, et al. v. Richard R. Hylland, et al., Case No. CIV034091 and Jerald and Betty Stewart, et al. v. Richard R. Hylland, et al., Case No. CIV034114. These shareholder derivative lawsuits allege that the defendants breached various fiduciary duties based upon the same general set of alleged facts and circumstances as the federal shareholder suits. The plaintiffs seek unspecified compensatory damages, restitution of improper
58
salaries, insider trading profits and payments from NorthWestern, and disgorgement under the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. In July 2003, the complaints were consolidated in the United States District Court for the District of South Dakota and given the caption In re NorthWestern Corporation Derivative Litigation, Case No. 03-4091. We cannot currently predict the impact or resolution of this litigation or reasonably estimate a range of possible loss, which could be material, and the resolution of these lawsuits may harm our business and have a material adverse impact on our financial condition.
In April 2003, the SEC notified NorthWestern that it is conducting an informal inquiry relating to questions regarding the restatements and other accounting and financial reporting matters. We are cooperating fully with the SEC's informal inquiry and have provided requested information as expeditiously as possible. Other than the informal SEC inquiry, as of the date hereof, we are not aware of any additional litigation or inquiry or investigation having been commenced against us related to these matters, but we cannot predict whether or not any such litigation or regulatory inquiry or investigation will be commenced or, if it is, the outcome of any such litigation or regulatory inquiry or investigation.
We are one of several defendants in a class action lawsuit entitled McGreevey, et al. v. The Montana Power Company, et al., now pending in federal court in Montana. The lawsuit, which was filed by the former shareholders of The Montana Power Company (most of whom became shareholders of Touch America Holdings, Inc. as a result of a corporate reorganization of The Montana Power Company), claims that the disposition of various generating and energy-related assets by The Montana Power Company were void because of the failure to obtain shareholder approval for the transactions. Plaintiffs thus seek to reverse those transactions, or receive fair value for their stock as of late 2001, when plaintiffs claim shareholder approval should have been sought. NorthWestern Corporation is named as a defendant due to the fact that we purchased Montana Power LLC, which plaintiffs claim is a successor to The Montana Power Company. Due to the recent filing by Touch America Holdings, Inc. for bankruptcy protection, the defendants removed the case to federal court, where it now is pending. We intend to vigorously defend against this lawsuit. We cannot currently predict the impact or resolution of this litigation or reasonably estimate a range of possible loss, which could be material, and the resolution of this lawsuit may harm our business and have a material adverse impact on our financial condition.
We are also one of several defendants in a class action lawsuit entitled In Re Touch America ERISA Litigation, which is currently pending in federal court in Montana. The lawsuit was filed by participants in the former Montana Power Company retirement savings plan and alleges that there was a breach of fiduciary duty in connection with the employee stock ownership aspects of the plan. The federal court has recently entered orders indefinitely staying the ERISA litigation because of Touch America Holdings Inc.'s bankruptcy filing. We intend to vigorously defend against these lawsuits. We cannot currently predict the impact or resolution of this litigation or reasonably estimate a range of possible loss, which could be material, and the resolution of this lawsuit may harm our business and have a material adverse impact on our financial condition.
We, and certain of our present and former officers and directors, were named as defendants in certain complaints filed against CornerStone Propane Partners LP, and other defendants purporting to be class actions filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California by purchasers of units of CornerStone Propane Partners alleging violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. Through November 1, 2002, we held an economic equity interest in a subsidiary that serves as the managing general partner of CornerStone Propane Partners, L.P. Certain present and former officers and directors of NorthWestern who are named as defendants in certain of these actions have also been sued in their capacities as directors of the managing general partner. These complaints allege that defendants sold units of CornerStone Propane Partners based upon false and misleading statements and failed to disclose material information about CornerStone Propane Partners' financial condition and future prospects, including
59
overpayment for acquisitions, overstating earnings and net income, and that it lacked adequate internal controls. The plaintiffs seek compensatory damages, prejudgment and post judgment interest and costs, injunctive relief, and other relief. We intend to vigorously defend against these lawsuits. We cannot currently predict the impact or resolution of this litigation or reasonably estimate a range of possible loss, which could be material, and the resolution of this lawsuit may harm our business and have a material adverse impact on our financial condition.
Certain of our present and former officers and directors, and CornerStone Propane Partners, L.P., as a nominal defendant, are among other defendants named in two derivative actions commenced in the Superior Court for the State of California, County of Santa Cruz, entitled Adelaide Andrews v. Keith G. Baxter, et al., Case No. CV146662 and Ralph Tyndall v. Keith G. Baxter, et al., Case No. CV146661. These derivative lawsuits allege that the defendants breached various fiduciary duties based upon the same general set of alleged facts and circumstances as the federal unitholder suits. The plaintiffs seek unspecified compensatory damages, treble damages pursuant to the California Corporations Code, injunctive relief, restitution, disgorgement, costs, and other relief. We cannot currently predict the impact or resolution of this litigation or reasonably estimate a range of possible loss, which could be material, and the resolution of these lawsuits may harm our business and have a material adverse impact on our financial condition.
On April 30, 2003, Mr. Richard Hylland filed a demand for arbitration of contract claims under his employment agreement, as well as tort claims for defamation, infliction of emotional distress and tortuous interference and a claim for punitive damages. Mr. Hylland is seeking relief in an amount of $25 million, plus interest, attorney's fees, costs, and punitive damages. We dispute Mr. Hylland's claims and intend to vigorously defend the arbitration. On May 8, 2003, we reported that the Special Committee of the Board formed to evaluate Mr. Hylland's performance and conduct in connection with the management of NorthWestern and its subsidiaries had completed its evaluation. Mr. Hylland is the former President and Chief Operating Officer of NorthWestern. Based on the recommendations of the Special Committee, on May 6, 2003, the Board determined that Mr. Hylland's performance and conduct as President and Chief Operating Officer warranted termination under his employment contract.
We are also subject to various other legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, the amount of ultimate liability with respect to these actions will not materially affect our financial position or results of operations.
Our Board of Directors has established August 26, 2003 at 2:00 pm CDT as the time for the annual meeting of shareholders. A proxy statement related to the annual meeting was mailed to all shareholders of common stock as of the record date of June 27, 2003.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
Exhibit 31.1Certification of chief executive officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002.
Exhibit 31.2Certification of chief financial officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002.
Exhibit 32.1Certification of chief executive officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Exhibit 32.2Certification of chief executive officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
60
We filed a Current Report on Form 8-K with the SEC on April 1, 2003, to furnish pursuant to Item 12 of the Report a press release containing material information regarding our results of operations and financial condition for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, including projected charges and expected net losses on common stock.
We filed a Current Report on Form 8-K with the SEC on April 16, 2003, to disclose under Item 5 of the Report a press release discussing results for the fourth quarter of 2002 and for the full year of 2002. The press release also discussed the restatement of our quarterly results for the first three fiscal quarters of 2002 and provided an update on our turnaround plan.
We filed a Current Report on Form 8-K with the SEC on April 30, 2003, to disclose under Item 5 of the Report a press release announcing that Richard R. Hylland had resigned as President and Chief Operating Officer.
We filed a Current Report on Form 8-K with the SEC on May 1, 2003, to disclose under Item 5 of the Report a press release announcing that Richard R. Hylland had resigned from the board of directors.
We filed a Current Report on Form 8-K with the SEC on May 5, 2003, to disclose under Item 5 of the Report a press release announcing that John Charters, the chief executive officer of Expanets, Inc., had been placed on paid administrative leave and that Rick Fresia was no longer Expanets' executive vice-president and chief financial officer.
We filed a Current Report on Form 8-K with the SEC on May 8, 2003, to disclose under Item 5 of the Report a press release announcing that Lawrence J. Ramaekers had been elected to fill a vacant spot on the board of directors as a Class III director.
We filed a Current Report on Form 8-K with the SEC on May 8, 2003, to disclose under Item 5 of the Report that the Special Committee of the board formed to evaluate Richard R. Hylland's performance and conduct in connection with management of the company and its subsidiaries had completed its evaluation. Based on the recommendations of the Special Committee, the board terminated Mr. Hylland's employment contract on May 6, 2003.
We filed a Current Report on Form 8-K with the SEC on May 15, 2003, to disclose under Item 5 of the Report a press release discussing results for the first quarter of 2003 and providing an update of the turnaround plan.
We filed a Current Report on Form 8-K with the SEC on May 27, 2003, to disclose under Item 5 of the Report a press release announcing that the board of directors had elected to defer interest payments on the subordinated debentures of all series of the company's trust preferred securities and, as a result, cash distributions on all series of the trust preferred securities issued by our affiliated trusts have been deferred.
We filed a Current Report on Form 8-K with the SEC on June 13, 2003, to disclose under Item 5 of the Report a press release announcing that Expanets had closed on a two-year, $25 million secured line of credit from Congress Financial.
We filed a Current Report on Form 8-K with the SEC on July 1, 2003, to disclose under Item 5 of the Report a press release announcing that the company had closed on the sale of its One Call Locators, Ltd. subsidiary.
We filed a Current Report on Form 8-K with the SEC on August 7, 2003, to disclose under Item 5 of the Report a press release announcing that Institutional Shareholder Services has recommended that common shareholders vote their proxy for Proposal 1: "Amendment and Restatement of the Restated Certificate of Incorporation," as described in our Definitive Proxy Statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 17, 2003.
61
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
NORTHWESTERN CORPORATION | |||
Date: August 14, 2003 |
By: |
/s/ KIPP D. ORME Kipp D. Orme Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
62
Exhibit Number |
Description |
|
---|---|---|
*31.1 | Certification of chief executive officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. | |
*31.2 | Certification of chief financial officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. | |
*32.1 | Certification of chief executive officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
*32.2 | Certification of chief financial officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |