Back to GetFilings.com

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

Commission file number 333-57103-01

Mack-Cali Realty, L.P.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding twelve (12) months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) Yes ý    No o and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past ninety (90) days Yes ý    No o.

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ý    No o

MACK-CALI REALTY, L.P.
FORM 10-Q

INDEX

2

MACK-CALI REALTY, L.P.

Part I—Financial Information

Item I.    Financial Statements

The accompanying unaudited consolidated balance sheets, statements of operations, of changes in partners' capital, and of cash flows and related notes thereto, have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP") for interim financial information and in conjunction with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). Accordingly, they do not include all of the disclosures required by GAAP for complete financial statements. The financial statements reflect all adjustments consisting only of normal, recurring adjustments, which are in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation for the interim periods.

The aforementioned financial statements should be read in conjunction with the notes to the aforementioned financial statements and Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and the financial statements and notes thereto included in Mack-Cali Realty, L.P.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002.

The results of operations for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2003 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire fiscal year or any other period.

3

MACK-CALI REALTY, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except per unit amounts)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

4

MACK-CALI REALTY, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per unit amounts)
(unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

5

MACK-CALI REALTY, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' CAPITAL

For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2003 (in thousands) (unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

6

MACK-CALI REALTY, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (in thousands) (unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

7

MACK-CALI REALTY, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (dollars in thousands, except per share/unit amounts)

1.     ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

ORGANIZATION

        Mack-Cali Realty, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, and its subsidiaries (the "Operating Partnership") was formed on May 31, 1994 to conduct the business of leasing, management, acquisition, development, construction and tenant-related services for its sole general partner, Mack-Cali Realty Corporation and its subsidiaries (the "Corporation" or "General Partner"). The Operating Partnership, through its operating divisions and subsidiaries, including the Mack-Cali property-owning partnerships and limited liability companies (collectively, the "Property Partnerships"), as described below, is the entity through which all of the General Partner's operations are conducted.

        The General Partner is a fully integrated, self-administered, self-managed real estate investment trust ("REIT"). The General Partner controls the Operating Partnership as its sole general partner, and owned an 88.1 percent and 88.0 percent common unit interest in the Operating Partnership as of June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively.

        The General Partner's business is the ownership of interests in and operation of the Operating Partnership, and all of the General Partner's expenses are incurred for the benefit of the Operating Partnership. The General Partner is reimbursed by the Operating Partnership for all expenses it incurs relating to the ownership and operation of the Operating Partnership. The Operating Partnership earns a management fee of between three percent and five percent of revenues, as defined, for its management of the Property Partnerships.

        As of June 30, 2003, the Operating Partnership owned or had interests in 263 properties plus developable land (collectively, the "Properties"). The Properties aggregate approximately 28.9 million square feet, which are comprised of 154 office buildings and 96 office/flex buildings totaling approximately 28.4 million square feet (which include five office buildings and one office/flex building aggregating 1.8 million square feet owned by unconsolidated joint ventures in which the Operating Partnership has investment interests), six industrial/warehouse buildings totaling approximately 387,400 square feet, three stand-alone retail properties totaling approximately 118,040 square feet (which include one retail property totaling approximately 100,740 square feet owned by an unconsolidated joint venture in which the Operating Partnership has an investment interest), one hotel (which is owned by an unconsolidated joint venture in which the Operating Partnership has an investment interest) and three land leases. The Properties are located in eight states, primarily in the Northeast, plus the District of Columbia.

BASIS OF PRESENTATION

        The accompanying consolidated financial statements include all accounts of the Operating Partnership, its majority-owned and/or controlled subsidiaries, which consist principally of Mack-Cali Realty, L.P. See Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures in Note 2 for the Operating Partnership's treatment of unconsolidated joint venture interests. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

8

        The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP") requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

2.     SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Rental Property

        Rental properties are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Costs directly related to the acquisition, development and construction of rental properties are capitalized. Capitalized development and construction costs include pre-construction costs essential to the development of the property, development and construction costs, interest, property taxes, insurance, salaries and other project costs incurred during the period of development. Included in total rental property is construction and development in-progress of $151,314 and $168,700 (including land of $52,816 and $50,481) as of June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively. Ordinary repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred; major replacements and betterments, which improve or extend the life of the asset, are capitalized and depreciated over their estimated useful lives. Fully-depreciated assets are removed from the accounts.

        The Operating Partnership considers a construction project as substantially completed and held available for occupancy upon the completion of tenant improvements, but no later than one year from cessation of major construction activity (as distinguished from activities such as routine maintenance and cleanup). If portions of a rental project are substantially completed and occupied by tenants, or held available for occupancy, and other portions have not yet reached that stage, the substantially completed portions are accounted for as a separate project. The Operating Partnership allocates costs incurred between the portions under construction and the portions substantially completed and held available for occupancy, and capitalizes only those costs associated with the portion under construction.

        Properties are depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. The estimated useful lives are as follows:

        On a periodic basis, management assesses whether there are any indicators that the value of the Operating Partnership's real estate properties may be impaired. A property's value is impaired only if management's estimate of the aggregate future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) to be generated by the property are less than the carrying value of the property. To the extent impairment has occurred, the loss shall be measured as the excess of the carrying amount of the property over the fair value of the property. The Operating Partnership's estimates of aggregate future cash flows expected to be generated by each property are based on a number of assumptions that are subject to economic and market uncertainties including, among others, demand for space, competition for tenants, changes in market rental rates, and costs to operate each property. As these factors are difficult to predict and are subject to future events that may alter management's assumptions, the

9

future cash flows estimated by management in its impairment analyses may not be achieved. Management does not believe that the value of any of the Operating Partnership's rental properties is impaired.

Rental Property Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations

        When assets are identified by management as held for sale, the Operating Partnership discontinues depreciating the assets and estimates the sales price, net of selling costs, of such assets. If, in management's opinion, the net sales price of the assets which have been identified as held for sale is less than the net book value of the assets, a valuation allowance is established.

        If circumstances arise that previously were considered unlikely and, as a result, the Operating Partnership decides not to sell a property previously classified as held for sale, the property is reclassified as held and used. A property that is reclassified is measured and recorded individually at the lower of (a) its carrying amount before the property was classified as held for sale, adjusted for any depreciation (amortization) expense that would have been recognized had the property been continuously classified as held and used, or (b) the fair value at the date of the subsequent decision not to sell.

        Effective January 1, 2002, the Operating Partnership adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("FASB") No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, which supercedes FASB No. 121. FASB No. 144 requires that long-lived assets that are to be disposed of by sale be measured at the lower of book value or fair value less cost to sell. FASB No. 144 retains the requirements of FASB No. 121 regarding impairment loss recognition and measurement. In addition, it requires that one accounting model be used for long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale and broadens the presentation of discontinued operations to include more disposal transactions. As the statement requires implementation on a prospective basis, properties which were identified as held for sale by the Operating Partnership prior to January 1, 2002 are presented in the accompanying financial statements in a manner consistent with the presentation prior to January 1, 2002. Properties identified as held for sale and/or sold from January 1, 2002 forward are presented in discontinued operations for all periods presented. See Note 6.

Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures, Net

        The Operating Partnership accounts for its investments in unconsolidated joint ventures under the equity method of accounting as the Operating Partnership exercises significant influence, but does not control these entities. These investments are recorded initially at cost, as Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures, and subsequently adjusted for equity in earnings and cash contributions and distributions.

        On a periodic basis, management assesses whether there are any indicators that the value of the Operating Partnership's investments in unconsolidated joint ventures may be impaired. An investment is impaired only if management's estimate of the value of the investment is less than the carrying value of the investment. To the extent impairment has occurred, the loss shall be measured as the excess of the carrying amount of the investment over the value of the investment. Management does not believe that the value of any of the Operating Partnership's investments in unconsolidated joint ventures is impaired. See Note 4.

10

Cash and Cash Equivalents

        All highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased are considered to be cash equivalents.

Deferred Financing Costs

        Costs incurred in obtaining financing are capitalized and amortized on a straight-line basis, which approximates the effective interest method, over the term of the related indebtedness. Amortization of such costs is included in interest expense and was $1,233 and $1,176 for the three months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, and $2,485 and $2,353 for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

Deferred Leasing Costs

        Costs incurred in connection with leases are capitalized and amortized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the related leases and included in depreciation and amortization. Unamortized deferred leasing costs are charged to amortization expense upon early termination of the lease. Certain employees of the Operating Partnership are compensated for providing leasing services to the Properties. The portion of such compensation, which is capitalized and amortized, approximated $730 and $706 for the three months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, and $1,492 and $1,696 for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

Restricted Cash

        Restricted cash includes tenant security deposits and escrow and reserve funds for debt service, real estate taxes, property insurance, capital improvements, tenant improvements, and leasing costs established pursuant to certain mortgage financing arrangements.

Derivative Instruments

        The Operating Partnership measures derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, at fair value and records them as an asset or liability, depending on the Operating Partnership's rights or obligations under the applicable derivative contract. For derivatives designated as fair value hedges, the changes in the fair value of both the derivative instrument and the hedged item are recorded in earnings. For derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, the effective portions of the derivative are reported in other comprehensive income ("OCI") and are subsequently reclassified into earnings when the hedged item affects earnings. Changes in fair value of derivative instruments not designated as hedging and ineffective portions of hedges are recognized in earnings in the affected period. See Note 9—Interest Rate Contract.

Revenue Recognition

        Base rental revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the respective leases. Unbilled rents receivable represents the amount by which straight-line rental revenue exceeds rents currently billed in accordance with the lease agreements. Parking and other revenue includes income from parking spaces leased to tenants, income from tenants for additional services provided by the Operating Partnership, income from tenants for early lease terminations and income from managing and/or leasing properties for third parties.

11

        Reimbursements are received from tenants for certain costs as provided in the lease agreements. These costs generally include real estate taxes, utilities, insurance, common area maintenance and other recoverable costs. See Note 14.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

        Management periodically performs a detailed review of amounts due from tenants to determine if accounts receivable balances are impaired based on factors affecting the collectibility of those balances. Management's estimate of the allowance for doubtful accounts requires management to exercise significant judgment about the timing, frequency and severity of collection losses, which affects the allowance and net income.

Income and Other Taxes

        The Operating Partnership is a partnership and, as a result, all income and losses of the partnership are allocated to the partners for inclusion in their respective income tax returns. Accordingly, no provision or benefit for income taxes has been made in the accompanying financial statements.

Earnings Per Unit

        The Operating Partnership presents both basic and diluted earnings per unit ("EPU"). Basic EPU excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net income available to common unitholders by the weighted average number of units outstanding for the period. Diluted EPU reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common units were exercised or converted into common units, where such exercise or conversion would result in a lower EPU amount.

Distributions Payable

        The distributions payable at June 30, 2003 represents distributions payable to preferred unitholders of record as of July 3, 2003 (10,000 Series C preferred units), distributions payable to common unitholders (65,859,497 common units) on that same date and preferred distributions payable to preferred unitholders (215,456 Series B preferred units) for the second quarter 2003. The second quarter 2003 Series C Preferred Unit distribution of $0.6722 per unit, common unit distributions of $0.63 per common unit, as well as the second quarter preferred unit distributions of $18.1818 per Series B preferred unit were approved by the Board of Directors of the Corporation on June 17, 2003. The Series C preferred unit distributions payable were paid on July 15, 2003. The common and Series B preferred unit distributions payable were paid on July 21, 2003.

        The distributions payable at December 31, 2002 represents distributions payable to common unitholders of record as January 6, 2003 (65,304,223 common units) and preferred distributions payable to Series B preferred unitholders (215,894 Series B preferred units) for the fourth quarter 2002. The fourth quarter 2002 common unit distributions of $0.63 per common unit, as well as the fourth quarter preferred unit distribution of $18.1818 per preferred unit, were approved by the Board of Directors of the Corporation on December 19, 2002 and paid on January 17, 2003.

12

Costs Incurred for Preferred Stock Issuances

        Costs incurred in connection with the Corporation's preferred stock issuances are reflected as a reduction of General Partners' capital.

Stock Options

        With respect to the Corporation's stock options which were granted prior to 2002, the Operating Partnership accounted for stock-based compensation using the intrinsic value method prescribed in Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees," and related Interpretations ("APB No. 25"). Under APB No. 25, compensation cost is measured as the excess, if any, of the quoted market price of the Corporation's stock at the date of grant over the exercise price of the option granted. Compensation cost for stock options, if any, is recognized ratably over the vesting period. The Corporation's policy is to grant options with an exercise price equal to the quoted closing market price of the Corporation's stock on the business day preceding the grant date. Accordingly, no compensation cost has been recognized under the Corporation's stock option plans for the granting of stock options made prior to 2002. In 2002, the Operating Partnership adopted the provisions of FASB No. 123, which requires, on a prospective basis, that the value of stock options at the grant date be amortized ratably into expense over the appropriate vesting period. The Corporation did not grant any stock options in 2002. For the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2003, the Operating Partnership recorded stock options expense of $50 and $88, respectively, for stock options granted in 2003. FASB No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation—Transition and Disclosure, was issued in December 2002 and amends FASB No. 123, Accounting for Stock Based Compensation. FASB No. 148 provides alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock based compensation. In addition, this Statement amends the disclosure requirements of FASB No. 123 to require prominent disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements about the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method used on reported results. FASB No. 148 disclosure requirements are presented as follows:

        The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per unit if the fair value based method had been applied to all outstanding and unvested stock awards in each period:

13

Reclassifications

        Certain reclassifications have been made to prior period amounts in order to conform with current period presentation.

3.     REAL ESTATE PROPERTY TRANSACTIONS

        On March 28, 2003, the Operating Partnership sold 1770 St. James Place, a 103,689 square-foot office building located in Houston, Harris County, Texas, for net sales proceeds of approximately $5,469. The Operating Partnership recognized a gain of $1,324 from the sale, which is presented in discontinued operations for the six months ended June 30, 2003. See Note 6.

4.     INVESTMENTS IN UNCONSOLIDATED JOINT VENTURES

        The debt of the Operating Partnership's unconsolidated joint ventures aggregating $156,019 as of June 30, 2003 is non-recourse to the Operating Partnership, except for customary exclusions pertaining to such matters as intentional misuse of funds, environmental conditions and material misrepresentations, and except as otherwise indicated below.

HPMC

        On April 23, 1998, the Operating Partnership entered into a joint venture agreement with HCG Development, L.L.C. and Summit Partners I, L.L.C. to form HPMC Development Partners, L.P. and, on July 21, 1998, entered into a second joint venture, HPMC Development Partners II, L.P. (formerly known as HPMC Lava Ridge Partners, L.P.), with these same parties. HPMC Development Partners, L.P.'s efforts focused on two development projects, commonly referred to as Continental Grand II and Summit Ridge. HPMC Development Partners II, L.P.'s efforts have focused on six development projects, commonly referred to as Lava Ridge, Pacific Plaza I & II and Stadium Gateway.

        The Operating Partnership has a 50 percent ownership interest and HCG Development, L.L.C. and Summit Partners I, L.L.C. (both of which are not affiliated with the Operating Partnership) collectively have a 50 percent ownership interest in HPMC Development Partners, L.P. and HPMC Development Partners II, L.P. (the "HPMC Joint Ventures"). Significant terms of the applicable partnership agreements, among other things, call for the Operating Partnership to provide 80 percent and HCG Development, L.L.C. and Summit Partners I, L.L.C. to collectively provide 20 percent of the development equity capital to the HPMC Joint Ventures. As the Operating Partnership has agreed to fund development equity capital disproportionate to its ownership interest, it was granted a preferred return of 10 percent on its invested capital as a priority. Profits and losses of each of the HPMC Joint Ventures are allocated to the partners based upon the priority of distributions specified in the respective agreements and entitle the Operating Partnership to a preferred return, as well as 50 percent of each of the HPMC Joint Ventures' residual profits above the preferred returns. Equity in earnings recognized by the Operating Partnership consists of preferred returns and the Operating Partnership's equity in the HPMC Joint Ventures' earnings (loss) after giving effect to the HPMC Joint Ventures' payment of such preferred returns.

Continental Grand II

        Continental Grand II is a 239,085 square-foot office building located in El Segundo, Los Angeles County, California, which was constructed and placed in service by the venture. On June 29, 2001, the venture sold the office property for approximately $67,000.

14

Summit Ridge

        Summit Ridge is an office complex comprised of six one-story buildings, aggregating 133,841 square feet, located in San Diego, San Diego County, California, which was constructed and placed in service by the venture. On January 29, 2001, the venture sold the office complex for approximately $17,450.

Lava Ridge

        Lava Ridge is an office complex comprised of six two-story buildings, aggregating 183,200 square feet, located in Roseville, Placer County, California, which was constructed and placed in service by the venture. On May 30, 2002, the venture sold the office complex for approximately $31,700.

Pacific Plaza I & II

        Pacific Plaza I & II is a two-phase development joint venture project, located in Daly City, San Mateo County, California between HPMC Development Partners II, L.P. and a third-party entity. Phase I of the project, which commenced initial operations in August 2001, consists of a nine-story office building, aggregating 364,384 square feet. Phase II comprises a six-story retail and theater complex. The theater portion of Phase II commenced initial operations in June 2002, with a portion of the retail space commencing operations in August 2002. The Operating Partnership performs management services for these properties owned by the joint venture and recognized $78 and $71 in fees for such services for the three months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, and $153 and $122 for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

Stadium Gateway

        Stadium Gateway is a development joint venture project, located in Anaheim, Orange County, California between HPMC Development Partners II, L.P. and a third-party entity. The venture has constructed a six-story, 273,194 square-foot office building, which commenced initial operations in January 2002. On April 1, 2003, the venture sold the office property for approximately $52,500.

G&G MARTCO (Convention Plaza)

        On April 30, 1998, the Operating Partnership acquired a 49.9 percent interest in an existing joint venture, G&G Martco, which owns Convention Plaza, a 305,618 square-foot office building, located in San Francisco, San Francisco County, California. A portion of the Operating Partnership's initial investment was financed through the issuance of common units, as well as funds drawn from the Operating Partnership's revolving credit facilities. On June 4, 1999, the Operating Partnership acquired an additional 0.1 percent interest in G&G Martco through the issuance of common units. The venture has a mortgage loan with a $50,000 balance at June 30, 2003 secured by its office property. The mortgage bears interest at a rate of the London Inter-Bank Offered Rate ("LIBOR") (1.12 percent at June 30, 2003) plus 162.5 basis points and matures in August 2003. The venture is currently pursing an extension on the mortgage loan, although no assurance can be given that such extension will be obtained. The Operating Partnership has posted a $1,816 letter of credit with the lender as a reserve for re-leasing costs. The Operating Partnership performs management and leasing services for the property owned by the joint venture and recognized $62 and $63 in fees for such services for the three months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, and $123 and $126 for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

15

AMERICAN FINANCIAL EXCHANGE L.L.C.

        On May 20, 1998, the Operating Partnership entered into a joint venture agreement with Columbia Development Company, L.L.C. to form American Financial Exchange L.L.C. The venture was formed to acquire land for future development, located on the Hudson River waterfront in Jersey City, Hudson County, New Jersey, adjacent to the Operating Partnership's Harborside Financial Center office complex. The Operating Partnership holds a 50 percent interest in the joint venture. Among other things, the partnership agreement provides for a preferred return on the Operating Partnership's invested capital in the venture, in addition to the Operating Partnership's proportionate share of the venture's profit, as defined in the agreement. The joint venture acquired land on which it constructed a parking facility, a portion of which is currently licensed to a parking operator. Such parking facility serves a ferry service between the Operating Partnership's Harborside property and Manhattan. In the fourth quarter 2000, the joint venture started construction of Plaza 10, a 577,575 square-foot office building, on certain of the land owned by the venture. Plaza 10 is 100 percent pre-leased to Charles Schwab & Co. Inc. ("Schwab") for a 15-year term. The lease agreement obligates the venture, among other things, to deliver space to the tenant by required timelines and offers expansion options, at the tenant's election. Such options may obligate the venture to construct an additional building or, at the Operating Partnership's option, to make space available in any of its existing Harborside properties. Should the venture be unable to or choose not to provide such expansion space, the venture would be liable to Schwab for its actual damages, in no event to exceed $15,000. The amount of Schwab's actual damages, up to $15,000, has been guaranteed by the Operating Partnership. The project, which commenced initial operations in September 2002, is currently projected to cost the Operating Partnership approximately $145,000, of which $134,720 has been incurred by the Operating Partnership through June 30, 2003. The venture has an agreement with the City of Jersey City, New Jersey, in which it is required to make payments in lieu of property taxes ("PILOT"). The agreement is for a term of 20 years. The PILOT is equal to two percent of Total Project Costs, as defined, with periodic increases, as defined. Total Project Costs, per the agreement, are the greater of $78,821 or actual Total Project Costs, as defined. The Operating Partnership performs management and leasing services for the property owned by the joint venture and recognized $78 and $0 in fees for such services for the three months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, and $303 and $0 for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

RAMLAND REALTY ASSOCIATES L.L.C. (One Ramland Road)

        On August 20, 1998, the Operating Partnership entered into a joint venture agreement with S.B. New York Realty Corp. to form Ramland Realty Associates L.L.C. The venture was formed to own, manage and operate One Ramland Road, a 232,000 square-foot office/flex building and adjacent developable land, located in Orangeburg, Rockland County, New York. In August 1999, the joint venture completed redevelopment of the property and placed the office/flex building in service. The Operating Partnership holds a 50 percent interest in the joint venture. The venture has a mortgage loan with a $15,109 balance at June 30, 2003 secured by its office/flex property. The mortgage bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 175 basis points and matures in January 2004. The loan provides for a one-year extension option upon payment of a fee and subject to certain conditions. In 2001, the property's then principal tenant, Superior Bank was closed by the Office of Thrift Supervision, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) was named receiver. The tenant continued to meet its rental payment obligations through June 2002. In July 2002, the tenant vacated the premises and the FDIC notified the joint venture that it was rejecting the lease as of July 16, 2002. As a result of the uncertainty regarding the tenant's ability to meet its obligations through the remainder of the term of its lease, the joint venture wrote off unbilled rents receivable of $1,573 and deferred leasing costs of $705, which is included in the Operating Partnership's equity in earnings for the six months ended June 30, 2002. Following Superior Bank's closure in June 2002, the venture's management determined it was unlikely a prospective tenant would retain tenant improvements previously made to Superior

16

Bank's space and, accordingly, the venture accelerated amortization of those tenant improvements and recorded a charge of $3,586, which is included in the Operating Partnership's equity in earnings for the six months ended June 30, 2003. The Operating Partnership performs management, leasing and other services for the property owned by the joint venture and recognized $3 and $25 in fees for such services for the three months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, and $8 and $49 for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

ASHFORD LOOP ASSOCIATES L.P. (1001 South Dairy Ashford/2100 West Loop South)

        On September 18, 1998, the Operating Partnership entered into a joint venture agreement with Prudential to form Ashford Loop Associates L.P. The venture was formed to own, manage and operate 1001 South Dairy Ashford, a 130,000 square-foot office building acquired on September 18, 1998, and 2100 West Loop South, a 168,000 square-foot office building acquired on November 25, 1998, both located in Houston, Harris County, Texas. The Operating Partnership holds a 20 percent interest in the joint venture. The Operating Partnership performed management and leasing services through March 2002 for the properties owned by the joint venture and recognized $0 and $45 in fees for such services for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2002, respectively. Under certain circumstances, Prudential has the right to convert its interest in the venture into common stock of the Corporation at a discount to the stock's fair market value, based on the underlying fair value of Prudential's interest in the venture at the time of conversion. The Operating Partnership, at its option, can elect to exchange cash in lieu of stock in an amount equal to the fair value of Prudential's interest.

        In May 2002, the Operating Partnership sent a notice to Prudential electing to exercise its option under the buy-sell provisions of the joint venture agreement. Subsequently, Prudential sent notice to the Operating Partnership that it was exercising its option to put its interest in the joint venture to the Operating Partnership in exchange for common stock of the Corporation as described above. In November 2002, the Operating Partnership and Prudential entered into a first amendment to their joint venture agreement pursuant to which: (i) the Operating Partnership retracted its notice of exercise of the buy-sell provisions of the joint venture agreement, (ii) Prudential retracted its notice of exercise of its option to put its interest in the joint venture to the Operating Partnership in exchange for common stock of the Corporation, as described above, (iii) the mechanics of the exercise by either party of their respective buy-sell, sale and exchange rights ("Exit Rights") were clarified and confirmed, and (iv) each party agreed to a one-year moratorium on the exercise of their respective Exit Rights while the parties attempt to reposition the assets of the joint venture.

ARCAP INVESTORS, L.L.C.

        In 1999, the Operating Partnership invested $20,000 in ARCap Investors, L.L.C., a joint venture with several participants, which was formed to invest in sub-investment grade tranches of commercial mortgage-backed securities ("CMBS"). William L. Mack, Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Corporation, is a principal of an entity that owns approximately 28 percent of the venture and has nominated a member of its board of directors. As of December 31, 2001, the Operating Partnership held a 20.1 percent interest in the common equity of ARCap Investors, L.L.C. On December 12, 2002, the Operating Partnership sold its interest in the venture for $20,225.

MC-SJP MORRIS V REALTY, LLC AND MC-SJP MORRIS VI REALTY, LLC

        The Operating Partnership has an agreement with SJP Properties, which provides for a cooperative effort in seeking approvals to develop up to approximately 1.8 million square feet of office development on certain vacant land owned by the Operating Partnership and SJP Properties, located in Hanover and Parsippany, Morris County, New Jersey. The agreement provides that the parties share equally in the costs associated with seeking such requisite approvals. Upon mutual consent, the Operating Partnership and SJP Properties may enter into one or more joint ventures to construct on

17

the vacant land, or seek to dispose of their respective vacant land parcels subject to the agreement. Pursuant to the agreement with SJP Properties, on August 24, 2000, the Operating Partnership entered into a joint venture with SJP Properties to form MC-SJP Morris V Realty, LLC and MC-SJP Morris VI Realty, LLC, which acquired developable land for approximately $16,193. The acquired land is able to accommodate approximately 650,000 square feet of office space and is located in Parsippany, Morris County, New Jersey. The venture entered into an agreement pertaining to the acquired land and two other land parcels in Parsippany with an insurance company to provide for a guarantee on the funding of the development of four office properties, aggregating 850,000 square feet. Such agreement provides, if the venture elects to develop, that the insurance company will be admitted to the joint venture and provide all the equity required to fund the development, subject to certain conditions. The venture has a mortgage loan with a $17,983 balance at June 30, 2003 secured by its land, which is guaranteed by the insurance company. The mortgage bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 125 basis points and matures in March 2004.

SOUTH PIER AT HARBORSIDE—HOTEL DEVELOPMENT

        On November 17, 1999, the Operating Partnership entered into an agreement with Hyatt Corporation ("Hyatt") to develop a 350-room hotel on the South Pier at Harborside Financial Center, Jersey City, Hudson County, New Jersey, which was completed and commenced initial operations in July 2002. The Operating Partnership owns a 50 percent interest in the venture. The venture has a mortgage loan with a commercial bank with a $62,868 balance at June 30, 2003 secured by its hotel property, which each partner, including the Operating Partnership, has severally guaranteed repayment of approximately $11,148. The debt bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 275 basis points and matures in December 2003. The loan provides for two one-year extension options upon payment of a fee and subject to certain conditions. Additionally, the venture has an $8,000 loan with the City of Jersey City, provided by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. The loan currently bears interest at fixed rates ranging from 6.09 percent to 6.62 percent and matures in August 2020. The Operating Partnership has posted an $8,000 letter of credit in support of this loan, $4,000 of which is indemnified by Hyatt.

18

SUMMARIES OF UNCONSOLIDATED JOINT VENTURES

        The following is a summary of the financial position of the unconsolidated joint ventures in which the Operating Partnership had investment interests as of June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002:

19

        The following is a summary of the results of operations of the unconsolidated joint ventures for the period in which the Operating Partnership had investment interests during the three months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002: