Back to GetFilings.com




QuickLinks -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549


FORM 10-K


FOR ANNUAL AND TRANSITION REPORTS
PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

(Mark One)

ý ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002

or

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                              to                             

Commission file number 0-25323


Albany Molecular Research, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
  14-1742717
(IRS Employer Identification No.)
21 Corporate Circle, P.O. Box 15098,
Albany, New York

(Address of principal executive offices)
  12212-5098
(zip code)

(518) 464-0279
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)


Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Title of Each Class
Common Stock, par value $.01 per share
Preferred Stock Purchase Rights

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý    No o

        Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). Yes ý    No o

        The aggregate market value of the Registrant's Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant on June 28, 2002 was approximately $507.0 million based upon the closing price per share of the Registrant's Common Stock as reported on the Nasdaq National Market on June 28, 2002. Shares of Common Stock held by each officer and director and by each person who owns 5% or more of the outstanding Common Stock have been excluded in that such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.

        As of March 14, 2003, there were 32,024,328 outstanding shares of the Registrant's Common Stock.



DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

        Portions of the following document are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Report on Form 10-K:

(1)
The Company's definitive proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 21, 2003.





ALBANY MOLECULAR RESEARCH, INC.
INDEX TO
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

 
   
  Page No.
Part I.
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements   1
Item 1.   Business   1
Item 2.   Properties   11
Item 3.   Legal Proceedings   12
Item 4.   Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders   12

Part II.
Item 5.   Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters   12
Item 6.   Selected Financial Data   14
Item 7.   Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations   15
Item 7A.   Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk   31
Item 8.   Financial Statements and Supplementary Data   31
Item 9.   Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure   69

Part III.
Item 10.   Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant   69
Item 11.   Executive Compensation   69
Item 12.   Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management   69
Item 13.   Certain Relationships and Related Transactions   70
Item 14.   Controls and Procedures   70
Item 15.   Principal Accountant Fees and Services   70

Part IV.
Item 16.   Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K   70

i


        This Form 10-K contains "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). Our actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements and therefore, prospective investors are cautioned that any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties. Actual events or results may differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including, without limitation, the factors set forth under "Risk Factors and Certain Factors Affecting Forward-Looking Statements," the discussion set forth below and the matters set forth in this Form 10-K generally. We do not undertake any obligation to update our forward-looking statements, except as required by applicable law.


PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS.

Overview

        We are a leading chemistry-based drug discovery and development company focused on applications for new small molecule prescription drugs. We conduct research and development projects and collaborate with many leading pharmaceutical, biotechnology and genomics companies, and are developing new chemistry technology for potential pharmaceutical products. We engage in chemistry research, from lead discovery, optimization and development to commercial manufacturing. We believe we are the only company providing contract chemistry services to customers across the entire product development cycle from lead discovery to commercial manufacturing. Most of the services we offer have been traditionally provided by chemistry divisions within pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, including drug discovery, medicinal chemistry, chemical development, analytical chemistry services and small-scale and pilot-plant manufacturing. In December 1999, we expanded our service offerings to include commercial manufacturing through our strategic relationship with and investment in Organichem Corporation. In February of 2003 we completed the acquisition of Organichem which is now our wholly-owned subsidiary. Organichem is a full service, cGMP custom manufacturer specializing in process development, pilot to commercial scale synthesis, high potency, low temperature and controlled substance manufacturing. The Organichem facility has manufactured ethical and over-the- counter drugs for more than 100 years. We have designed our services to permit our customers to reduce overall drug development time and cost and to pursue simultaneously a greater number of drug discovery and development opportunities.

        In addition to our chemistry research services, we also conduct proprietary research and development to discover new lead compounds with commercial potential. We anticipate that we would then license these compounds to third parties in return for up-front service fees and milestone payments as well as recurring royalty payments if these compounds are developed into new commercial drugs. In 1995, our proprietary research and development activities led to the development and patenting of a substantially pure form of, and a manufacturing process for, the active ingredient in the non-sedating antihistamine fexofenadine HCl marketed by Aventis S.A. as Allegra in the Americas and as Telfast elsewhere. Pursuant to a licensing agreement with Aventis, we have earned a total of $166.7 million in milestones and royalties from the beginning of the contract in 1995 through December 31, 2002 and are entitled to receive ongoing royalties from Aventis based upon a percentage of sales of Allegra. In addition, many of our discovery technology contracts provide for us to receive licensing, milestone and royalty payments for discoveries that lead to commercial products.

        We were originally incorporated in 1991 under the laws of New York and were reincorporated under the laws of Delaware in 1998.

1


Industry Overview

        The pace of drug discovery has accelerated significantly in recent years. Fueled by advances in disciplines such as molecular biology, high-throughput synthesis and screening and, in particular, human genomics research, opportunities to develop therapeutics for previously unmet or undermet medical needs are greater than ever before. We believe that human genomics research will lead to a dramatic increase in the number of newly identified biological targets over the next few years. In addition, pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies are under pressure to deliver new drugs to market and reduce the time required for drug development. This pressure has come about, in part, as a result of the significant number of current drug products on the market for which patent protection has or will soon expire.

        In order to take advantage of these opportunities and to respond to these pressures, many pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies have augmented their internal research and development capacity through contract services.

Drug Discovery, Development and Manufacturing Process

        Although many scientific disciplines are required for new drug discovery and development, chemistry and biology are at the center of this process. Chemists and biologists typically work together to prepare and deliver new chemical substances, develop laboratory models of disease, test compounds to identify agents that demonstrate the desired activity and finally create a marketable drug. The drug discovery and development process includes the following steps:

The Importance of Chemistry in the Drug Discovery and Development Process

        Lead Discovery.    The first major hurdle in drug discovery is the identification of one or more lead compounds that interact with a biological target, such as an enzyme, receptor or other protein, that may be associated with a disease. A biological test, or assay, based on the target is developed and used to test or "screen" chemical compounds. Medicinal chemistry is used to synthesize these compounds rapidly and study the interaction between the three-dimensional molecular structures of the compounds and biological targets. The objective of lead discovery is to identify a lead compound for further research and development.

        Lead Optimization.    Once a lead compound has been identified, medicinal chemistry is used to optimize that lead compound by modifying and synthesizing analogs of active lead candidates with improved potency, selectivity and/or pharmacokinetics (improved absorption, solubility, half-life and metabolism) in order to identify a more promising drug candidate. This iterative process involves the synthesis of compounds for biological testing, the analysis of the screening results and the further design and synthesis of additional compounds based upon the analysis of structure-activity relationships. During lead optimization, specialists in chemical development perform the scale-up synthesis of a lead compound as that compound is advanced through the drug discovery and development process. These scientists are experts in the preparation of chemicals on a larger scale and focus on the efficiency, economics, simplicity and safety of the preparation of such chemicals. Chemical development is also an iterative process which may require progressive improvements in chemical synthesis as subsequent

2



repeat batches are prepared. In addition to providing repeat synthesis, significant process research may be required to refine existing or develop new synthesis processes. Also during the lead optimization stage, analytical chemistry services are required for identity and purity testing and method development.

        Preclinical Testing.    Following the development of a lead compound during the lead optimization stage, advanced preclinical testing is conducted in order to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the lead compound prior to initiating human clinical trials. The lead compound must demonstrate a scientifically proven benefit in controlled and well-defined biological tests in animal models, and must exhibit this benefit at doses much lower than those at which side effects would occur. During the lead optimization and preclinical testing phases, scientists continue the synthesis of additional analogs of the lead compound using medicinal chemistry. Often a second compound, referred to as a backup compound or second generation analog, is synthesized and enters the drug development cycle. In addition, continued synthesis is desirable in order to prepare compounds of significant diversity to broaden potential patent coverage. As a result, the advancement of a lead compound into preclinical testing is often a catalyst which increases, rather than decreases, the need for additional medicinal chemical synthesis. During this phase, specialists in chemical development continue to conduct significant process research to optimize the production of a compound.

        Clinical Trials.    During clinical trials, several phases of studies are conducted to test the safety and efficacy of a drug candidate. As study populations increase and trial durations lengthen, larger quantities of the active ingredient are required. The bulk active ingredient, and the formulated drug product, must be prepared under current good manufacturing practices, commonly referred to as cGMP, guidelines. Analytical chemistry services are critical to cGMP manufacturing. Additional preparations provide an opportunity to further refine the manufacturing process, with the ultimate goal of maximizing the cost effectiveness and safety of the synthesis prior to commercialization.

Trends Toward Contracting for Chemistry Services

        While contract services have traditionally been limited to the later stages of drug development, such as clinical trial management and manufacturing, many pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies are utilizing contract chemistry service providers to complement or, in some cases supplement, internal chemistry expertise. Currently, only a few companies provide chemistry services for drug discovery, development and manufacturing, and these companies have typically focused only on certain stages of the drug development process. We believe the following trends have led and will continue to lead to an increase in contract chemistry services in drug discovery, development and manufacturing:

3


        We believe that significant opportunities exist for a company that provides a comprehensive range of contract chemistry services throughout the drug discovery, development and manufacturing process.

Our Capabilities

        We have a broad range of high-quality drug discovery and development, chemistry research and manufacturing capabilities. The problem-solving abilities of our scientists provide added value throughout the drug discovery, development and manufacturing process. We offer proprietary discovery technologies as well as chemistry services on a contract basis that have traditionally required significant time and capital investment to create internally. Our comprehensive suite of services allows our customers to contract with a single vendor, eliminating the time and cost of transitioning projects among multiple vendors.

Service Offerings

Drug Lead Discovery and Technologies

        We provide chemistry services and proprietary drug discovery technologies used to identify new lead compounds. We have developed biocatalysis technology that assists in the creation of combinatorial chemistry libraries. Biocatalysis technology uses enzymes and microbial cell systems to synthesize new compounds. Additional discovery technologies that we provide include isolation, purification, structure elucidation and the supply of natural products libraries from microbial and botanical sources, computational chemistry, virtual screening, pharmaco-and toxicogenomics, microbiology, fermentation, asymmetric synthesis and high throughput metabolic screening.

        As part of our acquisition of New Chemical Entities in January 2001, we acquired an extensive collection of over 100,000 diverse compounds and natural products libraries. In February 2003, we obtained Eli Lilly and Co.'s collection of natural product libraries including source materials, purified screening library samples, chemical analytical data and chemistry database tools. As part of our collaboration with Eli Lilly we have also initiated efforts to significantly enhance our biological screening capabilities.

        We have also begun to develop and market specialized compound libraries. During 2002, our combinatorial chemists synthetically created a library of approximately 30,000 unique, small molecule compounds which are not otherwise available commercially. We are also currently developing a novel chemical sample screening library of approximately 100,000 diverse compounds.

        We seek to bundle our drug discovery technologies and offerings in a strategic alliance to cost effectively identify new drug candidates with selected partners. As part of a strategic alliance we would seek to leverage or bundle our natural product libraries, natural product chemistry, biological screening, biocatalysis, small molecule libraries, computer aided drug design capabilities, medicinal chemistry, combinatorial chemistry, optimization, and other chemistry capabilities. In return, we would expect to receive a combination of fee for service, milestone and royalty payments based on the success of the drug candidate.

        We also seek to sell or license our natural product and chemical libraries, or subsets, to customers for near term revenue through a combination of up-front revenue, fee for service, milestone and royalty terms.

        Our drug discovery technologies complement our medicinal chemistry services as additional methods of developing and screening large numbers of compounds against drug targets to generate new drug leads. These drug discovery technologies give us the capability to:

4


Medicinal Chemistry

        The chemistry functions associated with the identification and optimization of a lead compound are handled by chemists specializing in medicinal chemistry. The role of the medicinal chemist is to synthesize small quantities of new and potentially patentable compounds for biological testing. Our medicinal chemistry group assists our customers in the pursuit of new drug leads as well as in lead development and optimization using modern structure-based drug design. Our medicinal chemistry group uses tools such as computational and combinatorial chemistry in conjunction with the traditional techniques of medicinal drug development. Medicinal chemistry services that we provide include:

Chemical Development

        Chemical development involves the scale-up synthesis of a lead compound. Processes developed for small scale production of a compound may not be suitable for larger scale production because they may be too expensive, environmentally unacceptable or present safety concerns. Our chemical development scientists design novel or improved methods and processes suitable for medium to large scale production. Our chemical development scientists possess expertise in a broad range of structural classes of molecules and are able to address a wide variety of chemical synthesis and production problems. Chemical development services that we provide include:

Analytical Chemistry Services

        Our analytical chemistry services include identity and purity testing, method development and validation, and stability testing. We also provide regulatory consulting services, including the preparation of regulatory filings, chemistry manufacturing and control documentation and testing, and scientific and technical writing. The cGMP guidelines mandated by the Food and Drug Administration ("FDA") necessitate employing analytical support for drugs under development, as well as for drugs already on the market. Our analytical services are designed to support our customers' compliance with these guidelines. We typically provide these services at several stages throughout the drug discovery, development and manufacturing process starting with lead optimization. Analytical services that we provide include:

5


cGMP Manufacturing Services

        We provide chemical synthesis and manufacturing services for our customers under cGMP guidelines. All facilities and manufacturing techniques used in the manufacture of products for clinical use or for sale in the United States must be operated in conformity with cGMP guidelines as established by the FDA. Our Albany facility has production facilities and quarantine and restricted access storage necessary for conducting cGMP manufacturing in quantities sufficient for conducting Phase I clinical trials (up to approximately 10 kilograms. Our customers can also obtain from us product quantities sufficient to conduct Phase II and Phase III clinical trials (between 10 and 100 kilograms) as well as commercial product quantities (greater than 100 kilograms).

Large Scale Manufacturing

        At our Organichem facility, we are able to provide large scale chemical synthesis and manufacturing to our customers. Organichem's production facilities adhere to cGMP manufacturing and provide the capability for larger scale chemical synthesis of active drug products and intermediates for use in human clinical trials as well as for products on the market.

Consulting Services

        We provide to our customers, in particular our biotechnology customers, consulting services across all chemistry phases of drug discovery, development and manufacturing.

Proprietary Research and Development

        We conduct proprietary research and development on promising drug candidates utilizing our medicinal chemistry tools as well as our discovery technologies, which consist of our biocatalysis technology, our technology for the synthesis of combinatorial libraries, our natural products related technologies as well as our microbiology, fermentation and asymmetric synthesis technologies. We are currently pursuing opportunities for applying our discovery technologies to promising drug candidates about which information is publicly available. In the event that we discover promising drug targets, we anticipate that we would license them to third parties in return for licensing, milestone and royalty payments.

Allegra/Telfast Licensing Agreement

        Our proprietary research and development efforts to date have contributed to the discovery and development of one product that has reached the market. We discovered a new process to prepare a metabolite known as terfenadine carboxylic acid, or TAM, in a purer form. The purer form of TAM is a non-sedating antihistamine known as fexofenadine HCl, which is sold by Aventis under the name Allegra in the Americas and as Telfast elsewhere. We have been issued several United States and foreign patents relating to TAM and the process chemistry by which TAM is produced. Subject to payment of government annuities and maintenance fees, our issued patents relating to TAM expire between 2013 and 2016.

        In March 1995, we entered into a license agreement with Aventis. Under the terms of the license agreement, we granted Aventis an exclusive, worldwide license to any patents issued to us related to

6



our original TAM patent applications. Since the beginning of the agreement through December 31, 2002, we have earned $7.4 million in milestone payments and $159.3 million in royalties under this license agreement. Aventis is obligated under the license agreement to pay ongoing royalties to us based upon sales of Allegra/Telfast. We are not entitled, however, to receive any additional milestone payments under the license agreement. Sales of Allegra/Telfast worldwide were approximately $1.92 billion for the year ended December 31, 2002, $1.56 billion for the year ended December 31, 2001 and approximately $1.07 billion for the year ended December 31, 2000.

Customers

        Our customers include pharmaceutical companies and biotechnology companies and, to a limited extent, agricultural companies, fine chemical companies and contract chemical manufacturers. For the year ended December 31, 2002, contract revenue from our three largest customers represented 12%, 12% and 7% of our contract revenue. For the year ended December 31, 2001, contract revenue from our three largest customers respectively represented approximately 18%, 14% and 10% of our contract revenue. No customer accounted for more than 10% of our total revenue for the year ended December 31, 2002. Contract revenue from Bristol-Myers Squibb, including contract revenue from Dupont Pharmaceuticals Company which was acquired by Bristol-Meyers Squibb in October 2001, accounted for 12% of our total revenue for the year ended December 31, 2001. No other customer accounted for more than 10% of our total revenue for the year ended December 31, 2001.

Marketing

        Our senior management and dedicated business development personnel are primarily responsible for marketing our services. Because our customers are typically highly skilled scientists, our use of technical experts in marketing has allowed us to establish strong customer relationships. In addition to our internal marketing efforts, we also rely on the marketing efforts of consultants, both in the United States and abroad. We market our services directly to customers through targeted mailings, meetings with senior management of pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, maintenance of an extensive Internet web site, participation in trade conferences and shows, and advertisements in scientific and trade journals. We also receive a significant amount of business from customer referrals and through expansion of existing contracts.

Employees

        We believe that the successful recruitment and retention of qualified Ph.D., masters and bachelor level scientists is a key element in achieving our strategic goals. We believe that as competitive pressures in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries increase, the recruitment and retention of chemists will become increasingly competitive. In order to meet this challenge, we actively recruit scientists at colleges and universities, through third-party recruitment firms and through contacts of our employees. We believe the sophisticated chemistry performed in the course of our business will assist us in attracting and retaining qualified scientists. We offer competitive salaries and benefits to our scientists. As an incentive directed toward the recruitment and retention of highly skilled scientists, we have a program which provides that any scientist or scientists employed by us named as an inventor on a patent not obtained in connection with a customer contract will receive a percentage of any net licensing, milestone and royalty revenues received by us with respect to the patent. Under this program, Thomas E. D'Ambra, Ph.D., our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, receives payments as the sole inventor on the patents for fexofenadine HCl. Dr. D'Ambra earned $5.1 million in 2002, $4.2 million in 2001 and $2.9 million 2000 under this program.

        As of February 28, 2003, we had 860 employees. Organichem's hourly work force of 109 employees is covered by a collective bargaining agreement with the International Chemical Workers Union. We consider our relations with our employees and the union to be good. None of our other employees are covered by a collective bargaining agreement.

7



Competition

        We face competition based on a number of factors, including size, relative expertise and sophistication, speed and costs of identifying and optimizing potential lead compounds and of developing and optimizing chemical processes. We compete with the research departments of pharmaceutical companies, biotechnology companies, combinatorial chemistry companies, contract research companies, contract drug manufacturing companies and research and academic institutions. Many of these competitors have greater financial and other resources and more experience in research and development than we do. Smaller companies may also prove to be significant competitors, particularly through arrangements with large corporate collaborators.

        Historically, pharmaceutical companies have maintained close control over their research and development activities, including the synthesis, screening and optimization of chemical compounds and the development of chemical processes. Many of these companies, which represent a significant potential market for our products and services, are developing or already possess in-house technologies and services offered by us. Academic institutions, governmental agencies and other research organizations are also conducting research in areas in which we provide services either on their own or through collaborative efforts.

        We anticipate that we will face increased competition in the future as new companies enter the market and advanced technologies become available. Our services and expertise may be rendered obsolete or uneconomical by technological advances or entirely different approaches developed by one or more of our competitors. The existing approaches of our competitors or new approaches or technologies developed by our competitors may be more effective than those developed by us. We cannot assure you that our competitors will not develop more effective or more affordable technologies or services, thus rendering our technologies and/or services obsolete, uncompetitive or uneconomical.

Patents and Proprietary Rights

        Our success will depend, in part, on our ability to obtain and enforce patents, protect trade secrets, obtain licenses to technology owned by third parties when necessary, and conduct our business without infringing the proprietary rights of others. The patent positions of pharmaceutical, medical products and biotechnology firms can be uncertain and involve complex legal and factual questions. We cannot assure you that any patent applications will result in the issuance of patents or, if any patents are issued, whether they will provide significant proprietary protection or commercial advantage, or will not be circumvented by others. In the event a third party has also filed one or more patent applications for inventions which conflict with one of ours, we may have to participate in interference proceedings declared by the United States Patent and Trademark Office to determine priority of invention, which could result in the loss of any opportunity to secure patent protection for the inventions and the loss of any right to use the inventions. Even if the eventual outcome is favorable to us, these proceedings could result in substantial cost to us. The filing and prosecution of patent applications, litigation to establish the validity and scope of patents, assertion of patent infringement claims against others and the defense of patent infringement claims by others can be expensive and time consuming. We cannot assure you that in the event that any claims with respect to any of our patents, if issued, are challenged by one or more third parties, that any court or patent authority ruling on such challenge will determine that such patent claims are valid and enforceable. An adverse outcome in such litigation could cause us to lose exclusivity afforded by the disputed rights. If a third party is found to have rights covering products or processes used by us, we could be forced to cease using the technologies covered by such rights, could be subject to significant liability to the third party, and could be required to license technologies from the third party. Furthermore, even if our patents are determined to be valid, enforceable, and broad in scope, we cannot assure you that competitors will not be able to design around such patents and compete with us and our licensees using the resulting alternative technology.

8



        We have a policy of seeking patent protection for patentable aspects of our proprietary technology. We have been issued twelve United States patents, five New Zealand patents, five Australian patents, three Canadian patents, three Norwegian patents, two Japanese patents, one Finnish patent and one European patent collectively covering fexofenadine HCl and certain related manufacturing processes. Subject to payment of government annuities and maintenance fees, our United States patents expire between 2013 and 2015, our Canadian, European, Finnish and Japanese patents expire in 2014 and our New Zealand, Australian and Norwegian patents expire between 2014 and 2016. Through our acquisition of EnzyMed, we obtained an exclusive license to one United States patent relating to a process of reacting enzymes in a non-aqueous solvent. Subject to payment of government annuities and maintenance fees, this patent expires in 2012. Through our acquisition of New Chemical Entities, we obtained an exclusive license to one United States Patent relating to a method of purifying and identifying a large multiplicity of chemical reaction products simultaneously. Subject to payment of government annuities and maintenance fees, this patent expires in 2018.

        We seek patent protection with respect to products and processes developed in the course of our activities when we believe such protection is in our best interest and when the cost of seeking such protection is not inordinate. However, we cannot assure you that any patent application will be filed, that any filed applications will result in issued patents or that any issued patents will provide us with a competitive advantage or will not be successfully challenged by third parties. The protections afforded by patents will depend upon their scope and validity, and others may be able to design around our patents.

        We may also enter into collaborations or other arrangements whereby we retain certain ownership rights or may be entitled to receive milestones and royalties with respect to proprietary technology developed by us. On March 15, 2002, we signed an agreement with Bristol-Meyers Squib Company, which includes the transfer of ownership to us of three patent applications related to Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and central nervous system indications. We intend to seek a third party licensee to develop this technology. Many of our other current contracts with our customers provide that ownership of proprietary technology developed by us in the course of work performed under the contract is vested in the customer, and we retain little or no ownership interest.

        We also rely upon trade secrets and proprietary know-how for certain unpatented aspects of our technology. To protect such information, we require all employees, consultants and licensees to enter into confidentiality agreements limiting the disclosure and use of such information. We cannot assure you that these agreements provide meaningful protection or that they will not be breached, that we would have adequate remedies for any such breach, or that our trade secrets, proprietary know-how, and technological advances will not otherwise become known to others. In addition, we cannot assure you that, despite precautions taken by us, others have not and will not obtain access to our proprietary technology. Further, we cannot assure you that third parties will not independently develop substantially equivalent or better technology.

9


Government Regulation

        Although the sale of our services is not subject to significant government regulation, the manufacture, transportation and storage of our products are subject to certain laws and regulations. However, our future profitability is indirectly dependent on the sales of pharmaceuticals and other products developed by our customers. Regulation by governmental entities in the United States and other countries will be a significant factor in the production and marketing of any pharmaceutical products that may be developed by our customers. The nature and the extent to which such regulation may apply to our customers will vary depending on the nature of any such pharmaceutical products. Virtually all pharmaceutical products developed by our customers will require regulatory approval by governmental agencies prior to commercialization. Human pharmaceutical products are subject to rigorous preclinical and clinical testing and other approval procedures by the FDA and by foreign regulatory authorities. Various federal and, in some cases, state statutes and regulations also govern or influence the manufacturing, safety, labeling, storage, record keeping and marketing of such pharmaceutical products. The process of obtaining these approvals and the subsequent compliance with appropriate federal and foreign statutes and regulations are time consuming and require the expenditure of substantial resources.

        Generally, in order to gain FDA approval, a company first must conduct preclinical studies in the laboratory and in animal models to gain preliminary information on a compound's efficacy and to identify any safety problems. The results of these studies are submitted as a part of an investigational new drug application, or IND, that the FDA must review before human clinical trials of an investigational drug can start. In order to commercialize any products, we or our customer will be required to sponsor and file an IND and will be responsible for initiating and overseeing the clinical studies to demonstrate the safety and efficacy that are necessary to obtain FDA approval of any such products. Clinical trials are normally done in three phases and generally take two to five years, but may take longer, to complete. After completion of clinical trials of a new product, FDA and foreign regulatory authority marketing approval must be obtained. If the product is classified as a new drug, we or our customer will be required to file a new drug application, or NDA, and receive approval before commercial marketing of the drug. The testing and approval processes require substantial time, effort and expense, and we cannot assure you that any approval will be granted on a timely basis, if at all. NDAs submitted to the FDA can take several years to obtain approval. Even if FDA regulatory clearances are obtained, a marketed product is subject to continual review. Later discovery of previously unknown problems or failure to comply with the applicable regulatory requirements may result in restrictions on the marketing of a product or withdrawal of the product from the market as well as possible civil or criminal sanctions. For marketing outside the United States, we will also be subject to foreign regulatory requirements governing human clinical trials and marketing approval for pharmaceutical products. The requirements governing the conduct of clinical trials, product licensing, pricing and reimbursement vary widely from country to country.

        All facilities and manufacturing techniques used in the manufacture of products for clinical use or for sale in the United States must be operated in conformity with cGMP guidelines as established by the FDA. Our facilities are subject to scheduled periodic regulatory inspections to ensure compliance with cGMP requirements. Failure on our part to comply with applicable requirements could result in the termination of ongoing research or the disqualification of data for submission to regulatory authorities. A finding that we had materially violated cGMP requirements could result in additional regulatory sanctions and, in severe cases, could result in a mandated closing of our facilities, which would materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

        Our research and development processes involve the controlled use of hazardous materials. We are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations governing the use, manufacture, storage, handling and disposal of such materials and certain waste products. Although we believe that our activities currently comply with the standards prescribed by such laws and regulations, the risk of

10



accidental contamination or injury from these materials cannot be eliminated. In the event of such an accident, we could be held liable for any damages that result and any such liability could exceed our resources. In addition, we cannot assure you that we will not be required to incur significant costs to comply with environmental laws and regulations in the future.

Internet Website

        We maintain a website on the World Wide Web at www.albmolecular.com. We make available, free of charge, on our website our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as soon as reasonable practicable after such reports are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. Our report filed with, or furnished to, the SEC are also available at the SEC's website at www.sec.gov.


ITEM 2. PROPERTIES.

        We lease a two-story 90,500 square foot facility in Albany, New York. The lease for this facility expires on December 31, 2013, although we have an option to renew this lease for eight additional five-year periods at our option. This Albany facility has nine medicinal chemistry laboratories, five chemical development laboratories, two analytical laboratories, three analytical instrumentation rooms, seven dedicated cGMP manufacturing suites and two areas for stability chambers.

        We lease approximately 43,615 square feet of laboratory and office space in a building adjacent to our Albany facility and are currently renovating an additional 15,578 square feet of space in the building. This facility presently has 68 scientific workstations. Construction recently began on of the additional space in of this facility which will provide an additional 56 scientific workstations. The lease for this facility expires on December 31, 2012, although we may renew the lease for four additional ten-year periods at our option.

        Construction of our new 55,000 square foot corporate headquarters is also underway. This new facility will house the Company corporate administration departments, an auditorium for scientific seminars as well as support facilities for our Albany staff.

        We also lease approximately 40,000 square feet of laboratory space in Rensselaer, New York at our East Campus. The lease for these laboratories expires November 30, 2009, although we may renew the lease for eight additional five-year periods at our option. This facility has eleven medicinal chemistry, and three combinatorial chemistry laboratories. During 2000, we constructed a 23,600 square foot state-of-the-art biotechnology development center with 33 scientific workstations at our East Campus. We have entered into a ten-year lease for this facility, although we may renew the lease for eight additional five-year periods at our option.

        We own a 28,000 square foot facility near Syracuse, New York, which includes forty scientific workstations. The purchase and renovation of this facility was financed through an industrial revenue bond.

        We lease approximately 23,700 square feet of primarily research and development space in Bothell, Washington under a lease that expires in October 2007, although we may renew the lease for four additional four year-periods at our option.

        In September 2001, we acquired an 88,000 square foot facility as part of our $10.0 million purchase of a Great Lakes Chemical Corporation research and development facility in Mt. Prospect, Illinois. This facility includes 55 fully equipped scientific workstations as well as a two-bay, non-GMP chemical pilot plant, research fermentation labs and supporting office space.

        For the year-ended December 31, 2002, we had total operating lease costs of $1.9 million.

11




ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

        We, from time to time, may be involved in various claims and legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our business. We are not currently a party to any such claims or proceedings which, if decided adversely to us, would either individually or in the aggregate have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

        Aventis Pharmaceuticals, the U.S. pharmaceutical business of Aventis S.A., is currently involved in legal proceedings with Barr Laboratories, Inc. regarding an Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) filed by Barr Laboratories with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration seeking authorization to produce and market a generic version of Allegra. Aventis Pharmaceuticals has filed three patent infringement suits against Barr in August and September of 2001 and in January 2002 against Barr alleging infringement of certain U.S. patents related to fexofenadine HCl 60 mg capsules, 30, 60, and 180 mg tablets of fexofenadine HCl, and Allegra-D, an extended-release tablet for oral administration. A trial date has been set for September 2004. In addition, Aventis filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Impax Laboratories in March 2002 after Impax filed an ANDA to produce and market a generic version of Allegra-D. In late 2002 and early 2003, three other generic companies filed ANDAs for Allegra products. Aventis has either brought a patent infringement lawsuit or is evaluating its legal options with respect to these additional filings. In the U.S. Aventis holds multiple method of use, formulation, process and composition patents with respect to Allegra. Under our arrangements with Aventis, we will receive royalties until expiration of our underlying patents or until they are earlier determined to be invalid and/or unenforceable. Under applicable federal law, marketing of an FDA-approved generic capsule or tablet at minimum may not commence unless and until a decision favorable to a generic challenger is rendered in the patent litigation or until 30 months have elapsed, whichever comes first. Aventis is taking the lead in preparing and executing a strategy to defend and enforce the intellectual property rights that exist with respect to Allegra.


ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.

        There were no matters submitted during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this report to a vote of security holders through solicitation of proxies or otherwise.


PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.

        (a)  Market Information. The Common Stock of the Company is traded on the Nasdaq National Market ("Nasdaq") under the symbol "AMRI." The following table sets forth the high and low closing prices for our Common Stock as reported by Nasdaq for the periods indicated:

Period

  High
  Low
Year ended December 31, 2001            
  First Quarter   $ 60.75   $ 29.81
  Second Quarter   $ 41.49   $ 29.15
  Third Quarter   $ 36.80   $ 19.05
  Fourth Quarter   $ 28.98   $ 22.04
Year ending December 31, 2002            
  First Quarter   $ 28.94   $ 21.58
  Second Quarter   $ 24.45   $ 19.85
  Third Quarter   $ 23.15   $ 16.51
  Fourth Quarter   $ 17.71   $ 13.95

12


        (b)  Holders. The number of record holders of the our Common Stock as of March 14, 2003 was approximately 187. We believe that the number of beneficial owners of our Common Stock at that date was substantially greater.

        (c)  Dividends. We have not declared any cash dividends on our Common Stock since our inception in 1991. We currently intend to retain our earnings for future growth and, therefore, do not anticipate paying cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Under Delaware law, we are permitted to pay dividends only out of our surplus, or, if there is no surplus, out of our net profits. Although our current bank credit facility permits us to pay cash dividends, subject to certain limitations, the payment of cash dividends may be prohibited under agreements governing debt which we may incur in the future.

        (d)  Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities; Use of Proceeds from Registered Securities.

        None.

13




ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.

 
  As of and for the Year Ended December 31,
 
  1998
  1999
  2000
  2001
  2002
 
  (In thousands, except per share data)

Consolidated Statements of Income Data:                              
Contract revenue   $ 14,308   $ 23,384   $ 39,874   $ 60,334   $ 71,688
Non-recurring licensing fees, milestones and royalties     8,069                
Recurring royalties     11,576     21,444     29,226     41,675     51,139
   
 
 
 
 
  Total revenue     33,953     44,828     69,100     102,009     122,827
   
 
 
 
 
Cost of contract revenue     8,393     13,848     23,356     34,946     41,313
Technology incentive award     1,822     2,132     2,921     4,165     5,107
Research and development     1,782     1,827     2,435     4,290     7,096
Selling, general and administrative     5,109     6,873     7,966     12,194     12,897
   
 
 
 
 
  Total operating expenses     17,106     24,680     36,678     55,595     66,413
   
 
 
 
 
Income from operations     16,847     20,148     32,422     46,414     56,414
Other income (expense):                              
  Equity in income (loss) of unconsolidated affiliates         (98 )   552     1,130     2,795
  Interest income, net     38     2,000     4,521     6,430     3,935
  Other income (expense), net     (37 )   (81 )   187     127     93
   
 
 
 
 
Total other income, net     1     1,821     5,260     7,687     6,823
   
 
 
 
 
Income before income tax expense     16,848     21,969     37,682     54,101     63,237
Income tax expense     6,351     8,195     14,089     19,707     22,686
   
 
 
 
 
Net income   $ 10,497   $ 13,774   $ 23,593   $ 34,394   $ 40,551
   
 
 
 
 
Basic earnings per share   $ 0.46   $ 0.51   $ 0.78   $ 1.04   $ 1.24
   
 
 
 
 
Diluted earnings per share   $ 0.41   $ 0.46   $ 0.74   $ 1.01   $ 1.22
   
 
 
 
 
Weighted average common shares outstanding, basic     22,696     27,132     30,363     33,065     32,632
Weighted average common shares outstanding, diluted     25,547     29,634     32,063     34,154     33,309

Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Cash, cash equivalents and investments   $ 7,347   $ 23,845   $ 152,024   $ 135,865   $ 129,537
Property and equipment, net     14,866     15,879     30,914     59,756     72,518
Working capital     9,142     34,432     161,335     155,276     163,133
Total assets     32,630     88,242     238,566     284,059     302,736
Long-term debt, less current maturities     13,349     168     120     5,930     5,281
Total stockholders' equity     12,824     82,920     228,533     263,633     282,367

14



ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

        The following discussion of the results of our operations and financial condition should be read in conjunction with the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes thereto included within this report.

Overview

        We are a leading chemistry-based drug discovery and development company, focused on applications for new small molecule prescription drugs. We engage in comprehensive chemistry research from lead discovery, optimization and development to commercial manufacturing. We perform chemistry research for many of the leading pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies and for our own internal research and development.

Critical Accounting Policies And Estimates

        Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to bad debts, inventories, intangible assets, unbilled revenue, income taxes and contingencies. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

        We believe the following critical accounting policies affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our customers to make required payments. If the financial condition of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required.

        As part of our strategy to provide a comprehensive offering of natural product and chemical lead finding discovery services and technologies to our customers, we have acquired natural product libraries and related assets and are producing novel compound libraries and chemical screening libraries. We have estimated the fair value of our natural product libraries obtained as part of our acquisition of New Chemical Entities in January 2001 and have included their value in our inventory. We are also capitalizing the cost of internally producing our novel compound and screening libraries in our inventory. In February 2003, we obtained Eli Lilly's & Co.'s collection of natural product libraries including source materials, purified screening library samples, chemical analytical data and chemistry database tools. As part of our collaboration with Eli Lilly we have also initiated efforts to significantly enhance our biological screening. We expect our investment in biological screening to be operational by the end of 2003. The combination of these investments should enhance our ability to market and sell our libraries, sales of which to date have not been significant. Total chemical library and natural products related assets recorded on our balance sheet as of December 31, 2002 were $13.3 million. If we are unable to successfully execute our business plan, or if actual market conditions are less favorable than those projected by management, we may be required to write-down the value of these assets, resulting in a charge to operations.

        We have equity investments in companies that have operations in areas within our strategic focus. We record an impairment charge when we believe an investment has experienced a decline in value

15



that is other than temporary. Future adverse changes in market conditions or poor operating results of underlying investments could result in losses or an inability to recover the carrying value of the investments that may not be reflected in their current carrying value, thereby possibly requiring an impairment charge in the future.

        Our intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over five to fifteen years. We review our intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the assets may not be recoverable. A determination of impairment is made based on estimates of future cash flows. If such assets are considered to be impaired the amount of the impairment would be based on the excess of the carrying value over the fair value of the assets.

        We perform an annual assessment of the carrying value of our goodwill for potential impairment. A determination of impairment is made based upon the estimated future cash flows of the operations associated with goodwill. If goodwill is determined to be impaired in the future we would be required to record a charge to our results of operations.

Contract Revenue

        Our contract revenue consists primarily of fees earned under contracts with third-party customers. In general, we provide services to our customers on the following basis:

        Typically, our full-time equivalent contracts have terms of six months or longer and our time and materials contracts have terms of one to twelve months. Fixed-price contracts are entered into for much shorter periods of time, generally two to six months. Because our fixed-price contracts relate to projects that are generally limited in scope and are of short duration, we have not historically experienced any material cost overruns under these contracts. Our full-time equivalent contracts provide for annual adjustments in billing rates for the scientists assigned to the contract. Generally, our contracts may be terminated by the customer upon 30 days' to one-year's prior notice, depending on the size of the contract. The Company recognizes revenue under full-time equivalent contracts on a monthly basis as work is performed based on the terms of the contract. Time and material contract revenues are recognized based on the number of hours devoted to the project multiplied by the customer's billing rates plus the material costs incurred. Fixed fee contract revenue is recognized by the Company as projects are completed and delivered. Cost of revenue consists primarily of compensation and associated fringe benefits for employees and other direct project-related costs.

Licensing Fees, Milestones and Royalties

        We seek to include provisions in our contracts for our discovery services which contain licensing, milestone and royalty payments should our proprietary technology and expertise lead to the discovery of new products that reach the market. To date, we have received substantially all of our milestone and royalty payments under these arrangements from Aventis with respect to Allegra. Generally, the provisions for licensing, milestone and royalty payments included in our contracts are related to the occurrence of specific identifiable events. We will recognize revenue upon the occurrence of one of these events, such as the successful completion of a clinical trial phase or the sale of a product

16



containing licensed technology, and the resolution of any uncertainties or contingencies regarding potential collection of the related payment.

        Non-recurring Licensing Fees, Milestones and Royalties.    Although we entered into a license agreement with Aventis in 1995, we began to recognize royalty revenue related to sales in the United States under that agreement in February 1998. This delay was due to the significant time expended for issuance of our patents and the resolution of related patent interference claims by Aventis.

        Recurring Royalties.    Recurring royalties consist of royalties from Aventis under a license agreement based on sales of fexofenadine HCl, marketed as Allegra in the Americas and Telfast elsewhere. Royalty payments are due within 45 days after each calendar quarter and are determined based on sales of Allegra/Telfast in that quarter.

Costs and Expenses

        Cost of Contract Revenue.    Our cost of contract revenue, from which we derive gross profit from net contract revenue, consists primarily of compensation and associated fringe benefits for employees and other direct and indirect project-related costs.

        Technology Incentive Award.    We maintain a Technology Development Incentive Plan designed to stimulate and encourage novel technology development by our employees. This plan allows eligible participants to share in a percentage of the net revenue earned by us relating to patented technology with respect to which the eligible participant is named as an inventor. Under our Technology Development Incentive Plan, Thomas E. D'Ambra, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, receives payments as the sole inventor of the patents for fexofenadine HCl equal to 10% of the total payments received by us with respect to those patents.

        Research and Development.    Research and development expense consists of payments in connection with collaborations with academic institutions, compensation and benefits for scientific personnel for work performed on proprietary research projects and costs of supplies and related chemicals as well as indirect costs. We are funding several internal research and development programs to discover new compounds with commercial potential. We would then seek to license these compounds to a third party in return for up-front license service fees and milestone payments as well as recurring royalty payments if these compounds are successfully developed into new drugs and reach the market. We utilize our expertise in biocatalysis, natural products and small molecule chemistry to perform our internal research and development projects. Included in our internal research and development projects is a Cooperative Research and Development Agreement with the National Cancer Institute to develop anti-cancer compounds, as well as other projects in the oncology and immunosuppression therapeutic areas.

        Selling, General and Administrative.    Selling, general and administrative expense consists of compensation and related fringe benefits for marketing and administrative employees, professional services, marketing costs and all costs related to facilities and information services.

        Other Income (Expense).    Other income (expense) consists of interest income, interest expense, our equity in our unconsolidated affiliates, Organichem and Fluorous Technologies, realized gains or losses on sales of investment securities and other non-operating expenses.

Results of Operations

Year Ended December 31, 2002 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2001

        Contract Revenue.    Contract revenue increased 19% to $71.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, compared to $60.3 million for 2001. This increase was due principally to a greater

17


number of projects under contract primarily for medicinal and chemical development services. This increase was facilitated by an increase in the number of scientific staff to 404 at December 31, 2002 from 360 at December 31, 2001. We expect our contract revenue will be positively impacted by our acquisition of Organichem during the first quarter of 2003. While research and development spending by pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies declined during 2002, we were able to maintain our growth during 2002. We expect the trend of cost reduction initiatives to continue in our customer base in the near term.

        Recurring Royalties.    Recurring royalties for the year ended December 31, 2002 increased 23% to $51.1 million, compared to $41.7 million for 2001. The increase was attributable to increased sales of fexofenadine HCl by Aventis. Beginning in December 2002 Schering Plough began to market and sell Claritin as an over-the-counter drug which could negatively impact future recurring royalty revenues.

        Total Revenue.    Total revenue for the year ended December 31, 2002 increased 20% to $122.8 million, compared to $102.0 million for 2001.

        Cost of Contract Revenue.    Cost of contract revenue increased 18% to $41.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, compared to $34.9 million for 2001. Contract revenue margin was 42% in 2002 and 2001, primarily due to increased rates on customer contracts and leveraging the expansion of our facilities.

        Technology Incentive Award.    The technology incentive award expense incurred under our Technology Development Incentive Plan increased 23% to $5.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, compared to $4.2 million for 2001. The increase was directly attributable to the increase in recurring royalties.

        Research and Development.    Research and development expense increased 65% to $7.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2002 compared to $4.3 million for 2001. The increase was due to an increase in internally funded research efforts utilizing drug discovery technologies acquired through the Company's recent acquisitions. Also contributing to the increase was the issuance of 53 stock purchase warrants to Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMS) in connection with an agreement entered with BMS with a value to us of $500. Under that agreement, BMS transferred to us intellectual property to us, providing us with ownership of one of BMS's late-stage pre-clinical drug candidates, along with patent applications covering Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and central nervous system indications related both to this candidate and structural analogs. Research and development expenditures were 6% of total revenue for the year ended December 31, 2002 compared to 4% for 2001.

        Selling, General and Administrative.    Selling, general and administrative expenses increased 6% to $12.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, compared to $12.2 million for 2001. The increase was primarily attributable to a $400 increase in administrative and marketing staff to support the expansion of our operations, additional expenses of $1.0 million related to the operations of our research center in Mount Prospect, Illinois which was acquired in September 2001 offset by a decrease in recruitment expenses of $900. Selling, general and administrative expenses represented 18% of contract revenue in 2002 compared to 20% of contract revenue in 2001. Included in selling, general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2001 was $1.6 million of goodwill amortization. In accordance with SFAS No. 142, we ceased amortizing goodwill effective January 1, 2002. Accordingly, no goodwill was amortized in 2003.

        Total Other Income, Net.    Total other income, net decreased 11% to $6.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, compared to $7.7 million for 2001. Total other income, net for 2002, was comprised of $3.9 million in interest income, net of interest expense, $2.8 million in income from our unconsolidated affiliates, Organichem and Fluorous Technologies, Inc., and approximately $93 of other non-operating income. Total other income, net for 2001 was comprised of $6.4 million in interest

18



income, net of interest expense, $1.1 million in income from our unconsolidated affiliates, Organichem and Fluorous Technologies, Inc., and $127 of other non-operating income. The decrease in interest income is the result of the lower interest rate environment and the repurchase of 1,098 shares of our stock at a cost of $23.2 million. Beginning in 2003, total other income, net will not include income from Organichem as a result of our acquisition of Organichem in the first quarter of 2003. Total other income, net from Organichem was $1.5 million and $3.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2002, respectively.

        Income Tax Expense.    Income tax expense increased to $22.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, compared to $19.7 million for 2001. The effective rate for our provision for income taxes was 36% in 2002 and 2001.

Year Ended December 31, 2001 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2000

        Contract Revenue.    Contract revenue increased 51% to $60.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2001, compared to $39.9 million for 2000. This increase was due principally to a greater number of projects under contract primarily for medicinal and chemical development services. This increase was facilitated by an increase in the number of scientific staff to 360 at December 31, 2001 from 222 at December 31, 2000.

        Recurring Royalties.    Recurring royalties for the year ended December 31, 2001 increased 43% to $41.7 million, compared to $29.2 million for 2000. The increase was attributable to increased sales of fexofenadine HCl by Aventis.

        Total Revenue.    Total revenue for the year ended December 31, 2001 increased 48% to $102.0 million, compared to $69.1 million for 2000.

        Cost of Contract Revenue.    Cost of contract revenue increased 50% to $34.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2001, compared to $23.4 million for 2000. Contract revenue margin increased to 42% in 2001 from 41% in 2000, primarily due to increased rates on customer contracts and leveraging the expansion of our facilities.

        Technology Incentive Award.    The technology incentive award expense incurred under our Technology Development Incentive Plan increased 43% to $4.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2001, compared to $2.9 million for 2000. The increase was directly attributable to the increase in recurring royalties.

        Research and Development.    Research and development expense increased 76% to $4.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2001 compared to $2.4 million for 2000. The increase was due primarily to an increase in internally-funded research efforts.

        Selling, General and Administrative.    Selling, general and administrative expenses increased 53% to $12.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2001, compared to $8.0 million for 2000. The increase was primarily attributable to an increase in administrative and marketing staff to support the expansion of our operations, and an increase in expenses related to recruitment of scientists. Selling, general and administrative expenses represented 20% of contract revenue in 2001 and 2000.

        Total Other Income, Net.    Total other income, net increased 46% to $7.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2001, compared to $5.3 million for 2000. Total other income, net for 2001, was comprised of $6.4 million in interest income, net of interest expense, $1.1 million in income from our unconsolidated affiliates, Organichem and Fluorous Technologies, Inc., and approximately $127,000 of other non-operating income. Total other income, net for 2000 was comprised of $4.5 million in interest income, net of interest expense, $552 in income from our unconsolidated affiliate, Organichem, and

19



$186,800 of other non-operating income. The increase in interest income is the result of increased investments resulting from the Company's follow on offering in October 2000.

        Income Tax Expense.    Income tax expense increased to $19.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2001, compared to $14.1 million for 2000. The effective rate for our provision for income taxes was 36% in 2001 and 37% in 2000.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

        Working capital was $163.1 million at December 31, 2002 compared to $155.3 million at December 31, 2001. The increase of $7.8 million resulted primarily from an increase in accounts receivable of $3.6 million and an increase in inventories of $6.9 million offset by a $6.3 million decrease in cash and cash equivalents and investments. We have available a $30.0 million credit facility to supplement our liquidity needs. There were no borrowings under this credit facility at December 31, 2002. Subsequent to December 31, 2002 we borrowed $25.5 million under this line to refinance Organichem's bank debt. All of such borrowings remain outstanding.

        We have historically funded our business through operating cash flows, proceeds from borrowings and the issuance of equity securities. For the year ended December 31, 2002, we generated cash of $34.3 million from operating activities as compared to $32.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2001.

        Total capital expenditures for the year ended December 31, 2002 were $17.4 million as compared to $21.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2001. Capital expenditures in 2002 were predominantly in connection with the expansion of our facilities in Albany, New York. These expenditures were primarily financed through operating cash flows.

        During 2002, we used $22.2 million for financing activities, consisting primarily of $23.2 million used to purchase treasury shares of common stock under our stock repurchase program described below. This was offset by $1.7 million generated from stock option exercises and shares purchased through our employee stock purchase plan. During 2001, we increased cash by $6.0 million from financing activities, consisting primarily of additional borrowings under long-term debt of $5.7 million.

        During the first quarter of 2003 we completed the acquisition of Organichem. On January 1, 2003 we exercised our conversion option with respect to $15.0 million of Organichem subordinated debentures. The conversion of the debentures into additional shares of Organichem common stock increased our ownership in Organichem from 39.2% to 75%. On February 12, 2003, we purchased the remaining outstanding shares of Organichem for $29.9 million in cash. The purchase price was funded through borrowings under our new five year $30.0 million term loan which matures on February 11, 2008. The term loan bears interest at a variable rate. Currently $20.0 million of the $30.0 million bears an interest rate of 3.37% and $10.0 million of the $30.0 million bears an interest rate of 2.34%. As a result of the Organichem acquisition, we expect to record approximately $24.0 million of goodwill, subject to our final valuation.

        The acquisition of Organichem will enable us to perform large-scale manufacturing of pharmaceutical intermediates and active ingredients. Organichem's cash requirements have historically been funded by cash from operations and debt financing. Organichem's business is subject to greater volatility due to the short term nature of its contracts, and this volatility could significantly impact future results of operations and cash flows. Effective January 1, 2003, we will begin consolidating Organichem's operating results. This will have the impact of increasing our revenue and cost of revenue. Organichem's historically gross margins are lower than ours, which could impact our future consolidated gross margins.

        We are pursuing the expansion of our operations through internal growth and strategic acquisitions. We expect that such activities will be funded from existing cash and cash equivalents, cash

20



flow from operations, the issuance of debt or equity securities and borrowings. Future acquisitions, if any, could be funded with cash on hand, cash from operations, borrowings under our credit facility and/or the issuance of equity or debt securities. There can be no assurance that attractive acquisition opportunities will be available to us or will be available at prices and upon such other terms that are attractive to us. We regularly evaluate potential acquisitions of other businesses, products and product lines and may hold discussions regarding such potential acquisitions. As a general rule, we will publicly announce such acquisitions only after a definitive agreement has been signed. In addition, in order to meet our long-term liquidity needs or consummate future acquisitions, we may incur additional indebtedness or issue additional equity or debt securities, subject to market and other conditions. There can be no assurance that such additional financing will be available on terms acceptable to us or at all. The failure to raise the funds necessary to finance our future cash requirements or consummate future acquisitions could adversely affect our ability to pursue our strategy and could negatively affect our operations in future periods.

        During 2002, we repurchased 1,098 shares of our own stock. From time to time we may repurchase additional shares under our second stock repurchase program which was approved by our board of directors during the fourth quarter of 2002. This second program allows us to repurchase up to an additional $15.0 million of our shares over a twelve month period. Through March 14, 2003 we had repurchased 465 shares of our stock under this stock repurchase program at a cost of $6.6 million, leaving $8.4 milion in repurchases available under the second repurchase program.

        The following table sets forth our obligations and commitments to make future payments under contracts.

Payments Due by Period (in thousands)

 
  Total
  Under 1 Year
  1-3 Years
  4-5 Years
  After 5 Years
Contractual Obligations                              
Long-Term Debt   $ 5,496   $ 215   $ 464   $ 485   $ 4,332
Operating Leases   $ 18,269   $ 2,363   $ 4,503   $ 4,273   $ 7,130
Capital Leases   $ 490   $ 490   $   $   $

        Subsequent to year-end, we entered into a new $30 million term loan to finance its acquisition of Organichem. The following table sets forth our obligations to make future payments on the loan:

 
  Total
  Under 1 Year
  1-3 Years
  4-5 Years
  After 5 Years
    $ 30,000   $ 803   $ 3,213   $ 25,984  

Related Party Transactions

Technology Development Incentive Plan

        In 1993, we adopted a Technology Development Incentive Plan to provide a method to stimulate and encourage novel innovative technology development. To be eligible to participate, the individual must be an employee and must be the inventor or co-inventor of novel technology that results in new revenues received by us. Eligible participants will share in awards based on a percentage of the licensing, royalty or milestone revenue received by us, as defined by the Plan.

        In 2000, 2001 and 2002 we awarded Technology Incentive Compensation to the inventor of the terfenadine carboxylic acid metabolite technology. The inventor is our Chief Executive Officer. The amounts awarded and included in the consolidated statements of income for the years ended December 31, 2000, 2001 and 2002 are $2.9 million, $4.2 million and $5.1 million, respectively. Included in accrued compensation in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2001 and

21



2002 are unpaid Technology Development Incentive Compensation awards of $1.2 million and $1.3 million, respectively.

Lease Agreement

        We currently have two long-term operating leases for our Albany, New York office and laboratory facilities with one of our shareholders who owns less than 1% of our common stock. We paid approximately $275, $275 and $709 to this related party during the years ended December 31, 2000, 2001 and 2002, respectively.

Notes Receivable

        From time to time we make loans to employees in the form of notes receivable. The notes receivable and accrued interest will not be repaid to us provided the employee remains in our employ throughout the term of the loan. If employment is terminated prior to the end of the loan term, a pro-rata portion of the principal and interest shall be repaid to us. Notes receivable from employees at December 31, 2001 and 2002 totaled $455 and $399, respectively. The amounts forgiven and charged to operations in the consolidated statements of income for the years ended December 31, 2000, 2001 and 2002 are $20, $20 and $200, respectively.

Telecommunication Services

        A member of our board of directors is the Chief Executive Officer of one of the providers of telephone and internet services to us. This telecommunications company was paid $89 and $162 for services rendered to us in 2001 and 2002, respectively.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

        In July 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations and No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.

        SFAS No. 141 requires that all business combinations be accounted for using the purchase method of accounting; use of the pooling-of-interests method is prohibited. Goodwill will initially be recognized as an asset and measured as the excess of the cost of the acquired entity over the net of the amounts assigned to assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Intangible assets other than goodwill will be recognized as an asset apart from goodwill if that asset arises from contractual or other legal rights. The Statement will apply to all business combinations initiated or completed after June 30, 2001. The adoption of SFAS No. 141 on January 1, 2002 did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

        SFAS No. 142 requires that goodwill (including goodwill reported on the separate GAAP financial statements of a subsidiary) will not be amortized but will be tested for impairment at least annually at the reporting unit level. Goodwill will be tested for impairment by comparing the fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying amount, including goodwill with an impairment loss recorded for excess goodwill, if any. Intangible assets will be amortized over their estimated useful lives and will be tested at least annually for impairment in accordance with SFAS No. 121. Intangible assets with an indefinite useful life will not be amortized until its life is determined to be no longer indefinite. SFAS No. 142 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001. The adoption of SFAS No. 142 on January 1, 2002 resulted in reduced amortization expense of approximately $1.5 million in our consolidated statement of income for the year ended December 31, 2002.

        In August 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations. SFAS No. 143 requires the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation to be recognized in the period in which it is incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. The associated asset

22



retirement costs are capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the long-lived asset. SFAS No. 143 is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2002. We believe the adoption of SFAS No. 143 Statement will not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

        In August 2001, the FASB also issued SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, which supersedes SFAS No. 121, Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of, and the accounting and reporting provisions of APB No. 30. SFAS No. 144 addresses financial accounting and reporting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets and is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of SFAS No. 144 on January 1, 2002 did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

        In May 2002, the FASB issued Statement No. 145, "Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB 13, and Technical Corrections as of April, 2002." This statement rescinds previously issued pronouncements relating to reporting gains and losses from extinguishments of debt to satisfy sinking-fund requirements, and accounting for intangible assets of motor carriers, amends the pronouncement on accounting for leases, and also amends various other pronouncements to make various technical corrections, clarify meanings, or describe their applicability under changed conditions. We do not believe that this statement will have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

        In July 2002, the FASB issued Statement No. 146 "Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities." This statement requires companies to recognize costs associated with exit or disposal activities when they are incurred rather than at the date of a commitment to an exit or disposal plan. Examples of costs covered by the statement include lease termination costs and certain employee severance costs that are associated with a restructuring, discontinued operation, plant closing, or other exit or disposal activity. Previous accounting guidance was provided by EITF Issue No. 94-3, "Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring)." Statement 146 replaces Issue 94-3 and is effective for all exit activities after December 31, 2002. We do not believe the adoption of this statement will have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

        In November 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Interpretation No. 45, Guarantor's Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others ("FIN 45"). FIN 45 elaborates on the disclosures to be made by a guarantor in its interim and annual financial statements about its obligations under certain guarantees that it has issued. It also clarifies that a guarantor is required to recognize, at the inception of a guarantee, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee. FIN 45 does not prescribe a specific approach for subsequently measuring the guarantor's recognized liability over the term of the related guarantee. It also incorporates without change, the guidance in FASB Interpretation No. 34, Disclosure of Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others, which is being superseded. The initial recognition and initial measurement provisions of FIN 45 are applicable on a prospective basis to guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002, irrespective of the guarantor's fiscal year-end. The disclosure requirements in FIN 45 are effective for financial statements of interim or annual periods ending after December 15, 2002. We do not expect this interpretation to have a material impact on our financial statements.

        In December 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation—Transition and Disclosure, which amends FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. SFAS 148 introduces two additional methods of transition for those companies that adopt SFAS 123's provisions for fair value recognition. The first method, the Modified Prospective Approach, would allow us to prospectively apply the provisions of SFAS 123 to all new awards and to the unvested portions of awards that have been granted since the

23



effective date of SFAS 123. The second method, the Limited Retrospective Approach, is the same as the Modified Prospective Approach except that all prior period financial statements would be restated as if SFAS 123 had been adopted for recognition purposes as of its effective date. We can elect not to apply these two additional methods and continue our fair value recognition under the provisions of SFAS 123. SFAS 148 requires the disclosures required in annual statements under SFAS 123 to be included in interim financial statements. The guidance and provisions for interim and annual disclosures under SFAS 148 are effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2002. We have elected to continue using the provisions for fair value recognition in APB 25. We have included the required disclosures under SFAS 148 in its financial statements.

        In January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Interpretation No. 46, "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities". FIN 46 provides guidance that determines conditions as to whether consolidation of a Variable Interest Entity is required. The requirements of FIN 46 are applicable to preexisting entities as of the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. Transition disclosure requirements of FIN 46 are required in all financial statements of interim or annual periods ending after February 1, 2003. We do not expect this interpretation to have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

24


RISK FACTORS AND CERTAIN FACTORS AFFECTING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

        The following factors should be considered carefully in addition to the other information in this Form 10-K. Except as mentioned under "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk" and except for the historical information contained herein, the discussion contained in this Form 10-K contains "forward-looking statements," within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act, that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed in this Form 10-K. Important factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include those discussed below, as well as those discussed elsewhere herein.

We may not be able to recruit and retain the highly skilled employees we need.

        Our future growth and profitability depends upon the research and efforts of our highly skilled employees, such as our scientists, and their ability to keep pace with changes in drug discovery and development technologies. We believe that there is a shortage of scientists, and we compete vigorously with pharmaceutical firms, biotechnology firms, contract research firms, and academic and research institutions to recruit scientists. If we cannot recruit and retain scientists and other highly skilled employees, we will not be able to continue our existing services and will not be able to expand the services we offer to our customers.

Pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies may discontinue or decrease their usage of our services.

        We depend on pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies that use our services for a large portion of our revenues. Although there has been a trend among pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies to outsource drug research and development functions, this trend may not continue. We have experienced increasing pressure on the part of our customers to reduce expenses, including the use of our services as a result of negative economic trends generally and in the pharmaceutical industry. While we have continued to increase our contract revenues despite this environment we may not be able to continue this trend should these economic conditions intensify or worsen. If pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies discontinue or decrease their usage of our services, including as a result of the slowdown in the overall United States economy, our revenues and earnings could be lower than we expect and our revenues may decrease or not grow at historical rates.

We may lose one or more of our major customers.

        During the year ended December 31, 2002, we earned approximately 31% of our contract revenues providing services to three major customers. Our customers typically may cancel their contracts with 30 days' to one-year's prior notice depending on the size of the contract, for a variety of reasons, many of which are beyond our control. If any one of our major customers cancels its contract with us, our contract revenues may decrease.

The royalties we earn on Allegra may decrease.

        We have been issued several patents on a pure form of, and a manufacturing process for, fexofenadine HCl. The patent positions of pharmaceutical, medical and biotechnology firms can be uncertain and can involve complex legal and factual questions. Litigation, in particular patent litigation, can be complex and time-consuming and the outcome is inherently uncertain. We cannot assure investors that Aventis will ultimately succeed in its current or any future litigation against generic drug manufacturers involving patents with respect to Allegra. In the event that one or more of the patents owned by us or Aventis are ultimately determined to be invalid or unenforceable, Aventis and we would lose exclusivity with respect to the claims covered by those patents. Any such loss of exclusivity and the contemporaneous introduction of generic forms of fexofenadine HCl may cause a reduction in Allegra sales. In addition, under our current arrangements with Aventis, Aventis, with consultation

25



from us, will take the lead with respect to preparing and executing a strategy to defend and enforce certain of the patents relating to Allegra. As a result, we may not be able to control the conduct of such litigation and the strategic decisions that are made during the course of such litigation.

        On May 11, 2001, an FDA advisory panel recommended that the prescription allergy drugs Claritin, Allegra and Zyrtec are safe enough to be made available over-the-counter. The panel had been assembled as a result of a 1998 petition by Blue Cross of California (now Wellpoint Health Networks) requesting that the three top-selling prescription antihistamines be changed to OTC status. The FDA panel's only consideration was whether Claritin, Allegra and Zyrtec have the safety profile for over-the-counter use without a learned intermediary. The panel's recommendation remains under consideration by the full FDA. The FDA's reaction to its advisory panel's recommendation with regard to the safety of Allegra is uncertain. In November 2002, Schering Plough received approval by the FDA to voluntarily switch the status of Claritin from prescription to OTC status. In December 2002, Schering Plough began to market and sell Claritin as an OTC drug.

        Royalties from sales of Allegra currently constitute a significant portion of our total revenues and operating income. During the year ended December, 31 2002, our royalties from Allegra were $51.1 million, which represented approximately 42% of our total revenues. For the year ended December 31, 2001, our royalties from Allegra were $41.7 million, which represented approximately 41% of our total revenues. Due to the Claritin OTC switch, the potential for generic competition and the possibility that the FDA requires Allegra or Zyrtec to be sold in an over-the-counter form, there may be an adverse effect on Allegra's reimbursement status by third-party payers and on the price at which it can be sold. Any such price reduction may not be adequately offset by increased volume of sales. If the dollar amount of Allegra sales subject to our license agreement decreases, due to these or any other factors, our revenues from our license agreement with Aventis will also decrease. Because we have very few costs associated with the Allegra license, a decrease in revenues from our license agreement for Allegra would have a disproportionately adverse effect on our results of operation.

We may be unsuccessful in producing and licensing proprietary technology developed from our internal research and development efforts or acquired from a third party.

        We have expended and continue to expend time and money on internal research and development with the intention of producing proprietary technologies in order to patent and then license them to other companies. However, we may not be successful in producing any valuable technology or successful in licensing it to a third party. To the extent we are unable to produce technology that we can license, we may not receive any revenues related to our internal research and development efforts.

We may be unsuccessful in selling or licensing the chemical and natural product libraries currently in our inventory.

        As of December 31, 2002 the total cost of our chemical and natural product libraries included in our inventory is $9.2 million. Although, we write down our inventories for estimated obsolescence or unmarketable inventory, if actual market conditions are less favorable than those projected by management, additional inventory write-downs may be required in the future.

We may lose valuable intellectual property if we are unable to protect it.

        Some of our most valuable assets include patents and trade secrets. Part of our business is developing technologies that we patent and then license to other companies. However, some technologies that we develop may already be patented by other companies. For this and other reasons, we may not be able to obtain patents for each new technology that we develop. Even if we are able to obtain patents, the patents may not sufficiently protect our interest in the technology. Similarly, we may not be able to protect our trade secrets by keeping them confidential. Additionally, protecting our

26



patents and trade secrets may be costly and time consuming. To the extent we are unable to protect intellectual property, our investment in those technologies may not yield the benefits we expected. In addition, we may be subject to claims that we are infringing on the intellectual property of others. We could incur significant costs defending such claims. If we are unsuccessful in defending these claims, we may be subject to liability for infringement.

We may not be able to license technologies that we need to conduct our business.

        In addition to the technologies that we develop, we also rely on technologies that we license from other companies. We may not be able to license technologies that we need in the future or we may be unable to license such technologies on a commercially reasonable basis. Our inability to license the technologies we need could result in increased costs and, therefore, reduced profits, or the inability to engage in certain activities that require those technologies.

Our failure to manage our expansion may adversely affect us.

        Our business has expanded rapidly in the past several years. Expansion places increased stress on our financial, managerial and human resources. As we expand, we will need to recruit and retain additional highly skilled scientists and technicians. Expansion of our facilities may lead to increased expenses and may divert management attention away from operations.

Future acquisitions may disrupt our business and distract our management.

        We have engaged in a number of acquisitions and strategic investments, and we expect to continue to do so. We may not be able to identify suitable acquisition candidates, and if we do identify suitable candidates, we may not be able to make such acquisitions on commercially acceptable terms or at all. If we acquire another company, we may not be able to successfully integrate the acquired business into our existing business in a timely and non-disruptive manner or at all. We may have to devote a significant amount of time and resources to do so. Even with this investment of time and resources, an acquisition may not produce the revenues, earnings or business synergies that we anticipate. If we fail to integrate the acquired business effectively or if key employees of that business leave, the anticipated benefits of the acquisition would be jeopardized. The time, capital, management and other resources spent on an acquisition that fails to meet our expectations could cause our business and financial condition to be materially and adversely affected. In addition, acquisitions can involve non-recurring charges and amortization of significant amounts of goodwill that could adversely affect our results of operations.

We may not be able to realize the benefits of recent acquisitions and strategic investments.

        We acquired EnzyMed, Inc., a provider of combinatorial biocatalysis discovery services, in October 1999; American Advanced Organics, Inc., a contract manufacturer of novel compounds, pharmaceutical intermediates and test drug substances, in February 2000; New Chemical Entities, a chemistry-based drug discovery company, in January 2001; and Great Lakes Chemical Company's research and development facility outside of Chicago, Illinois in September 2001. We made a strategic investment in Organichem Corporation in December 1999 to facilitate a management buyout of a chemical manufacturing facility from Nycomed Amersham, plc and completed the full acquisition of Organichem in February 2003. These transactions may not be as beneficial to us as we expect. We also have an investment in Fluorous Technologies, Inc. Fluorous Technologies is a development stage company and may not be able to successfully develop technology and products.

27



We may lose one or more of our key employees.

        Our business is highly dependent on our senior management and scientific staff, including:

        Although we have employment agreements with the individuals listed above, we do not have employment agreements with all of our key employees. Additionally, the loss of any of our other key employees, including our scientists, may have an adverse effect on our business.

The royalties we earn on Allegra will likely be affected by the seasonal nature of allergies.

        Allergic reactions to plants, pollens and other airborne allergens generally occur during the spring and summer seasons. Therefore, we expect the demand for Allegra to be lower during other times of the year. Because Allegra sales change seasonally based on the demand for allergy medicines, our quarter-to-quarter revenues will likely experience fluctuations.

We face increased competition.

        We compete directly with the in-house research departments of pharmaceutical companies and biotechnology companies, as well as combinatorial chemistry companies, contract research companies, and research and academic institutions. Many of our competitors have greater financial and other resources than we have. As new companies enter the market and as more advanced technologies become available, we expect to face increased competition. In the future, any one of our competitors may develop technological advances that render the services that we provide obsolete. While we plan to develop technologies, which will give us competitive advantages, our competitors plan to do the same. We may not be able to develop the technologies we need to successfully compete in the future, and our competitors may be able to develop such technologies before we do. Consequently, we may not be able to successfully compete in the future.

We may be held liable for harm caused by drugs that we develop and test.

        We develop, test and, to a limited extent, manufacture drugs that are used by humans. If any of the drugs that we develop, test or manufacture harms people, we may be required to pay damages to those persons. Although we carry liability insurance, we may be required to pay damages in excess of the amounts of our insurance coverage. Damages awarded in a product liability action could be substantial and could have a negative impact on our financial condition.

We may be liable for contamination or other harm caused by hazardous materials that we use.

        Our research and development processes involve the use of hazardous materials. We are subject to federal, state and local regulation governing the use, manufacture, handling, storage and disposal of hazardous materials. We cannot completely eliminate the risk of contamination or injury resulting from hazardous materials and we may incur liability as a result of any contamination or injury. We may also incur expenses relating to compliance with environmental laws. Such expenses or liability could have a significant negative impact on our financial condition.

28



If we fail to meet strict regulatory requirements, we could be required to pay fines or even close our facilities.

        All facilities and manufacturing techniques used to manufacture drugs in the United States must conform to standards that are established by the federal Food and Drug Administration, or FDA. The FDA conducts scheduled periodic inspections of our facilities to monitor our compliance with regulatory standards. If the FDA finds that we fail to comply with the appropriate regulatory standards, it may impose fines on us or, if the FDA determines that our non-compliance is severe, it may close our facilities. Any adverse action by the FDA would have a negative impact on our operations.

Our operations may be interrupted by the occurrence of a natural disaster or other catastrophic event at our primary facilities.

        We depend on our laboratories and equipment for the continued operation of our business. Our research and development operations and all administrative functions are primarily conducted at our facilities in Albany and Rensselaer, New York. Although we have contingency plans in effect for natural disasters or other catastrophic events, catastrophic events could still disrupt our operations. Even though we carry business interruption insurance policies, we may suffer losses as a result of business interruptions that exceed the coverage available under our insurance policies. Any natural disaster or catastrophic event in the Albany area or in our facilities could have a significant negative impact on our operations.

Terrorist attacks or acts of war may seriously harm our business.

        Terrorist attacks or acts of war may cause damage or disruption to our company, our employees, our facilities and our customers, which could significantly impact our revenues, costs and expenses and financial condition. The terrorist attacks that took place in the United States on September 11, 2001 were unprecedented events that have created many economic and political uncertainties, some of which may materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. The long-term effects on our company of the September 11, 2001 attacks are unknown. The potential for future terrorist attacks, the national and international responses to terrorist attacks, and other acts of war, including the current war in Iraq, or hostility have created many economic and political uncertainties, which could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition in ways that we currently cannot predict.

Health care reform could reduce the prices pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies can charge for drugs they sell which, in turn, could reduce the amounts that they have available to retain our services.

        We depend on contracts with pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies for a majority of our revenues. We therefore depend upon the ability of pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies to earn enough profit on the drugs they market to devote substantial resources to the research and development of new drugs. Future legislation may limit the prices pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies can charge for the drugs they market. Such laws may have the effect of reducing the resources that pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies can devote to the research and development of new drugs. If pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies decrease the resources they devote to the research and development of new drugs, the amount of services that we perform, and therefore our revenues, could be reduced.

29



The ability of our stockholders to control our policies and effect a change of control of our company is limited, which may not be in your best interests.

        There are provisions in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws which may discourage a third party from making a proposal to acquire us, even if some of our stockholders might consider the proposal to be in their best interests. These provisions include the following:

        Additionally, we are subject to Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which, in general, imposes restrictions upon acquirers of 15% or more of our stock.

        We have adopted a Shareholder Rights Plan, the purpose of which is, among other things, to enhance the Board's ability to protect shareholder interests and to ensure that shareholders receive fair treatment in the event any coercive takeover attempt of us is made in the future. Under the terms of the Shareholder Rights Plan, the Board can in effect prevent a person or group from acquiring more than 15% of the outstanding shares of our Common Stock. Once a shareholder acquires more than 15% of our outstanding Common Stock without Board approval (the "acquiring person"), all other shareholders will have the right to purchase securities from us at a price less than their then fair market value. These subsequent purchases by other shareholders substantially reduce the value and influence of the shares of Common Stock owned by the acquiring person.

Our officers and directors will have significant control over us and their interests may differ from yours.

        At March 14, 2003, our directors and officers beneficially owned or controlled approximately 15.9% of our common stock. Individually and in the aggregate, these stockholders significantly influence our management, affairs and all matters requiring stockholder approval. In particular, this concentration of ownership may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing an acquisition of us and may adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

Because our stock price may be volatile, our stock price could experience substantial declines.

        The market price of our common stock has historically experienced and may continue to experience volatility. Our quarterly operating results, changes in general conditions in the economy or the financial markets and other developments affecting us or our competitors could cause the market price of our common stock to fluctuate substantially. In addition, in recent years, the stock market has experienced significant price and volume fluctuations. In addition, during the past twelve months, the stock market, and in particular technology companies, have experienced significant decreases in market value. In addition, the global economic and potential uncertainty, including as a result of the war in Iraq and the international controversy that accompanied it, have created significant additional volatility in the United States capital markets. This volatility and the recent market decline has affected the market prices of securities issued by many companies, often for reasons unrelated to their operating performance or their business prospects, and may adversely affect the price of our common stock.

30



Because we do not intend to pay dividends, you will benefit from an investment in our common stock only if it appreciates in value.

        We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock. We currently intend to retain our future earnings, if any, to finance the expansion of our business and do not expect to pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. As a result, the success of your investment in our common stock will depend entirely upon any future appreciation. There is no guarantee that our common stock will appreciate in value or even maintain the price at which you purchased your shares.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

        We invest our excess cash in interest-bearing investment-grade securities that we hold for the duration of the term of the respective instrument. We do not utilize derivative financial instruments, derivative commodity instruments or other market risk sensitive instruments, positions or transactions in any material fashion. Accordingly, we believe that, while the investment-grade securities we hold are subject to changes in the financial standing of the issuer of such securities, we are not subject to any material risks arising from changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, commodity prices, equity prices or other market changes that affect market risk sensitive instruments.


ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.


INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
ALBANY MOLECULAR RESEARCH, INC.

 
  Page

Report of Independent Accountants

 

32

Consolidated Statements of Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2000, 2001 and 2002

 

33

Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2001 and 2002

 

34

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity and Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2000, 2001 and 2002

 

35

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2000, 2001 and 2002

 

36

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

37

31



Report of Independent Accountants

         To the Stockholders and Board of Directors of
Albany Molecular Research, Inc.

        In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the index appearing under Item 16(a)(1) present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Albany Molecular Research, Inc. and its subsidiaries at December 31, 2002 and 2001 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2002 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule listed in the index appearing under 16(a)(2) presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management; our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

        As discussed in Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements, on January 1, 2002 the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.

Albany, New York
February 6, 2003

32



ALBANY MOLECULAR RESEARCH, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

Years Ended December 31, 2000, 2001 and 2002

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

 
  Year ended December 31,
 
 
  2000
  2001
  2002
 
Contract revenue   $ 39,874   $ 60,334   $ 71,688  
Recurring royalties     29,226     41,675     51,139  
   
 
 
 
  Total revenue     69,100     102,009     122,827  
   
 
 
 
Cost of contract revenue     23,356     34,946     41,313  
Technology incentive award     2,921     4,165     5,107  
Research and development     2,435     4,290     7,096  
Selling, general and administrative     7,966     12,194     12,897  
   
 
 
 
  Total operating expenses     36,678     55,595     66,413  
   
 
 
 
Income from operations     32,422     46,414     56,414  
Other income (expense):                    
Equity in income (loss) of unconsolidated affiliates     552     1,130     2,795  
Interest expense     (28 )   (229 )   (168 )
Interest income     4,549     6,659     4,103  
Realized gain (loss) on sale of investment securities     3          
Other income (expense), net     184     127     93  
   
 
 
 
  Total other income, net     5,260     7,687     6,823  
   
 
 
 
Income before income tax expense     37,682     54,101     63,237  
Income tax expense     14,089     19,707     22,686  
   
 
 
 
Net income   $ 23,593   $ 34,394   $ 40,551  
   
 
 
 
Basic earnings per share   $ 0.78   $ 1.04   $ 1.24  
   
 
 
 
Diluted earnings per share   $ 0.74   $ 1.01   $ 1.22  
   
 
 
 

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

33



ALBANY MOLECULAR RESEARCH, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

December 31, 2001 and 2002

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

 
  December 31,
 
 
  2001
  2002
 
Assets              
Current assets:              
  Cash and cash equivalents   $ 46,919   $ 34,838  
  Investment securities, available-for-sale     88,946     94,699  
  Accounts receivable (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $218 at December 31, 2001 and 2002)     9,965     13,572  
  Royalty income receivable     12,361     13,251  
  Inventory     6,473     13,402  
  Unbilled services     993     555  
  Prepaid expenses and other current assets     2,144     2,776  
   
 
 
    Total current assets     167,801     173,093  
Property and equipment, net     59,756     72,518  
   
 
 
Other assets:              
  Goodwill     17,165     17,181  
  Intangible assets and patents, net     4,769     4,804  
  Equity investment in unconsolidated affiliates     16,439     19,215  
  Convertible subordinated debentures from unconsolidated affiliate     16,273     15,000  
  Other assets     1,856     925  
   
 
 
    Total other assets     56,502     57,125  
   
 
 
    Total assets   $ 284,059   $ 302,736  
   
 
 
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity              
Current liabilities:              
  Accounts payable   $ 2,660   $ 3,509  
  Unearned income     2,723     1,116  
  Customer deposits     325     60  
  Accrued compensation     3,877     3,878  
  Accrued expenses     1,249     692  
  Income taxes payable     967      
  Current installments on capital leases     506     490  
  Current installments of long-term debt     218     215  
   
 
 
    Total current liabilities     12,525     9,960  
   
 
 
Long-term liabilities:              
  Long-term debt, excluding current installments     5,508     5,281  
  Capital leases, excluding current installments     422        
Deferred income taxes     1,971     5,128  
   
 
 
Total liabilities     20,426     20,369  
   
 
 
Commitments and contingencies              
Stockholders' equity:              
  Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, authorized 2,000 shares, none issued or outstanding            
  Common stock, $0.01 par value, authorized 50,000 shares; 33,127 shares issued in 2001 and 33,445 shares issued in 2002     331     334  
Additional paid-in capital     180,524     182,642  
Retained earnings     83,703     124,254  
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net     (474 )   (1,184 )
   
 
 
      264,084     306,046  
Less, treasury shares at cost, 20 shares in 2001; 1,118 shares in 2002     (451 )   (23,679 )
   
 
 
  Total stockholders' equity     263,633     282,367  
   
 
 
  Total liabilities and stockholders' equity   $ 284,059   $ 302,736  
   
 
 

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

34


ALBANY MOLECULAR RESEARCH, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Years Ended December 31, 2000, 2001 and 2002
(In thousands)

 
   
  Common Stock
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
 
   
   
   
  Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income

  Treasury Stock
   
   
 
 
  Preferred
Stock

  Number
of
Shares

  $0.01
Par
Value

  Additional
Paid-in
Capital

  Retained
Earnings

   
  Comprehensive
Income

 
 
  Shares
  Amount
  Total
 
Balances at January 1, 2000       29,187   $ 292   $ 56,927   $ 25,716   $ (15 )       $ 82,920        
Comprehensive income:                                                          
  Net Income                       23,593                 23,593   $ 23,593  
  Unrealized gain on investment securities, available-for-sale, net of taxes                                 40               40     40  
                                                     
 
    Total comprehensive income                                                     $ 23,633  
                                                     
 
  Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs         3,000     30     118,587                           118,617        
  Tax benefit from exercise of stock options                     1,187                           1,187        
  Issuance of common stock in connection with stock option plan and ESPP         549     5     832                           837        
  Issuance of common stock in connection with business combination       50     1     1,338                     1,339        
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
       
Balances at December 31, 2000       32,786     328     178,871     49,309     25           228,533        
Comprehensive income:                                                          
  Net income                           34,394                     34,394   $ 34,394  
  Unrealized gain on investment securities, available-for-sale, net of taxes                                 175               175     175  
  Organichem Corporation Other Comprehensive Loss                                 (674 )             (674 )   (674 )
                                                     
 
    Total comprehensive income                                                     $ 33,895  
                                                     
 
  Tax benefit from exercise of stock options                     533                           533        
  Issuance of common stock in connection with stock option plan and ESPP         341     3     1,120                           1,123        
  Treasury shares purchased                                     (20 )   (451 )   (451 )      
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
             
Balances at December 31, 2001       33,127     331     180,524     83,703     (474 ) (20 )   (451 )   263,633        
Comprehensive income:                                                          
  Net income                           40,551                     40,551   $ 40,551  
  Unrealized (loss) on investment securities, available-for-sale, net of taxes                                 (349 )             (349 )   (349 )
Organichem Corporation Other Comprehensive Loss                                 (361 )             (361 )   (361 )
                                                     
 
    Total comprehensive income                                                     $ 39,841  
                                                     
 
  Tax benefit from exercise of stock options                     427                           427        
  Issuance of common stock in connection with stock option plan and ESPP         318     3     1,191                           1,194        
Issuance of warrants to BMS                     500                           500        
  Treasury shares purchased                                     (1,098 )   (23,228 )   (23,228 )      
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
       
Balances at December 31, 2002   $   33,445   $ 334   $ 182,642   $ 124,254   $ (1,184 ) (1,118 ) $ (23,679 ) $ 282,367        
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
             

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

35



ALBANY MOLECULAR RESEARCH, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

Years Ended December 31, 2000, 2001 and 2002

(In thousands)

 
  Year ended December 31,
 
 
  2000
  2001
  2002
 
Operating activities:                    
  Net income   $ 23,593   $ 34,394   $ 40,551  
  Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:                    
  Depreciation and amortization     2,413     5,204     4,906  
  Tax benefit of stock option exercises     1,187     533     427  
  Net realized (gain) on sale of investment securities     (3 )        
  Provision for doubtful accounts         200      
  Non-cash interest income     (1,436 )   (501 )    
  Equity in income of unconsolidated affiliate     (552 )   (1,130 )   (2,795 )
  Provision for deferred taxes     1,349     1,742     3,157  
  Forgiven principal on notes receivable-related party     20     20     200  
Change in operating assets and liabilities, net of business combination:                    
  Increase in accounts receivable     (3,643 )   (1,955 )   (3,607 )
  Increase in royalty income receivable     (2,445 )   (4,534 )   (890 )
  Increase in inventory     (490 )   (1,474 )   (6,929 )
  Decrease (increase) in unbilled services     26     (923 )   439  
  Decrease (increase) in income taxes     4,533     (398 )   (967 )
  Decrease (increase) in prepaid expenses and other assets     (789 )   633     1,356  
  Increase (decrease) in accounts payable, accrued compensation and accrued expenses     2,975     (197 )   293  
  Increase (decrease) in customer deposits     273     (178 )   (265 )
  Increase (decrease) in unearned income     (466 )   1,477     (1,607 )
   
 
 
 
Net cash provided by operating activities     26,545     32,913     34,269  
   
 
 
 
Investing activities:                    
  Purchases of investment securities     (6,449 )   (61,358 )   (6,102 )
  Proceeds from sales of investment securities     92          
  Purchase of equity investment in unconsolidated affiliate     (696 )       (342 )
  Purchases of property and equipment     (16,525 )   (21,155 )   (17,387 )
  Purchase of business, net of cash acquired     (869 )   (33,800 )    
  Payments for patent application and other related costs     (14 )   (222 )   (317 )
  Net decrease in short-term investment     1,000          
   
 
 
 
Net cash used in investing activities     (23,461 )   (116,535 )   (24,148 )
   
 
 
 
Financing activities:                    
  Principal payments on long-term debt     (838 )       (230 )
  Principal payments under capital lease obligations         (329 )   (438 )
  Proceeds from borrowings under long-term debt     125     5,700      
  Payment to acquire treasury shares         (451 )   (23,228 )
  Proceeds from sale of common stock, net     119,454          
  Issuance of stock purchase warrant             500  
  Proceeds from exercise of options and ESPP         1,123     1,194  
   
 
 
 
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities     118,741     6,043     (22,202 )
   
 
 
 
  Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents     121,825     (77,579 )   (12,081 )
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period     2,673     124,498     46,919  
   
 
 
 
  Cash and cash equivalents at end of period   $ 124,498   $ 46,919   $ 34,838  
   
 
 
 
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities:                    
  Increase (decrease) in net unrealized gain/loss on securities available-for-sale, net of tax   $ 40   $ 175   $ (349 )
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:                    
  Cash paid during the period for:                    
    Interest   $ 28   $ 221   $ 152  
    Income taxes   $ 9,669   $ 17,964   $ 20,899  

        See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

36



ALBANY MOLECULAR RESEARCH, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2000, 2001 and 2002

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Nature of Business:

        Albany Molecular Research, Inc. (the "Company") is a leading chemistry-based drug discovery and development company focused on applications for new small molecule prescription drugs. The Company conducts research and development projects and collaborates with many leading pharmaceutical, biotechnology and genomics companies, and is developing new chemistry technology for potential pharmaceutical products. The Company engages in chemistry research, from lead discovery, optimization and development to commercial manufacturing. In addition to its chemistry research services, the Company also conducts proprietary research and development to discover new lead compounds with commercial potential. The Company would seek to license these compounds to third parties in return for up-front service fees and milestone payments as well as recurring royalty payments if these compounds are developed into new drugs successfully reaching the market. The Company is also producing novel compound libraries and chemical screening libraries.

        On September 21, 2001, the Company completed its $10,000 acquisition of Great Lakes Chemical Corporation's laboratory facilities in Mt. Prospect, Illinois. The facility, renamed the Mount Prospect Research Center, has expertise in a range of chemical and biochemical disciplines, including chemical process development, analytical chemistry, biocatalysis, microbiology, fermentation, and asymmetric synthesis. See Note 2 for discussion of the Company's acquisition of the Great Lakes Chemical Corporation's research laboratory facilities and operations.

        On January 25, 2001, the Company completed its acquisition of the outstanding stock of New Chemical Entities, Inc. (NCE) of Bothell, Washington, for approximately $23,000. NCE, renamed AMRI Bothell Research Center, is now a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. NCE provides a range of drug discovery services, as well as platform technologies for proprietary lead discovery. The company's core technologies include: isolation, purification, structure elucidation and the supply of natural products libraries from microbial and botanical sources; computational and combinatorial chemistry, including chemoinformatics, proprietary databases and proprietary data mining capabilities; and chemical synthesis. See Note 2 for the discussion of the Company's acquisition of NCE.

        On February 4, 2000, the Company completed its acquisition of the assets of American Advanced Organics, Inc. (AAO) of Syracuse, New York (renamed the Syracuse Research Center) for $1,000 in cash and $1,300 in common stock. The Company's Syracuse Research Center specializes in the production of pharmaceutical intermediates in quantities ranging from a few grams to multi-kilogram batches. The Syracuse Research Center's expertise is in the rapid development and implementation of procedures with a focus on delivering high quality products on or before their scheduled delivery date. See Note 2 for discussion of the Company's acquisition of AAO.

        On December 21, 1999, the Company made a $30,000 strategic investment in Organichem Corporation (formerly the Rensselaer, New York-based chemical manufacturing facilities of Nycomed Amersham). Organichem Corporation operates a chemical manufacturing facility in Rensselaer, New York, and performs large-scale manufacturing of pharmaceutical intermediates and active ingredients. See Note 3 for discussion of the Company's equity and other investments in Organichem Corporation. During the first quarter of 2003 the Company completed the acquisition of Organichem. See Note 18.

37



Basis of Presentation:

        The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Albany Molecular Research, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, AMRI Bothell Research Center, AMR Technology, Inc. and Albany Molecular Research Export, Inc. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated during consolidation. The Company has not reported segment information because the Company operates in only one business segment. The Company's 39.2% investment in Organichem Corporation (see Note 4) is accounted for using the equity method of accounting.

        The Company's acquisition of Great Lake Chemicals Corporation laboratory facilities on September 21, 2001 has been accounted for as a purchase business combination as further discussed in Note 2. Accordingly, the operating results of the Mount Prospect Research Center have been included in the Company's results of operation from the date of acquisition.

        The Company's acquisition of NCE on January 25, 2001 has been accounted for as a purchase business combination as further discussed in Note 2. Accordingly, the operating results of AMRI Bothell Research Center have been included in the Company's results of operation from the date of acquisition.

        The Company's acquisition of AAO on February 4, 2000 has been accounted for as a purchase business combination as further discussed in Note 2. Accordingly, the operating results of the Syracuse Research Center have been included in the Company's results of operation from the date of acquisition.

        It is the Company's policy to reclassify prior year consolidated financial statements to conform to the current year presentation.

Revenue Recognition:

        The Company recognizes revenue under full-time equivalent contracts on a monthly basis as work is performed based on the terms of the contract. Time and material contract revenues are recognized based on the number of hours devoted to the projected multiplied by the customer's billing rates plus the material costs incurred. Fixed fee contract revenue is recognized by the Company as projects are completed and delivered. In general, contract provisions include predetermined payment schedules, or the submission of appropriate billing detail establishing prerequisites for billings. Unbilled services arise when services have been rendered under these contracts but customers have not been billed. Similarly, unearned income represents prebilling for services that have not yet been performed. Any losses on contracts are recorded when they are determinable and estimable.

        Certain of the Company's contracts for discovery services include provisions which contain licensing, milestone and royalty payments should the Company's proprietary technology and expertise lead to the discovery of new products that reach the market. To date, the Company has received substantially all of our milestone and royalty payments under these arrangements from Aventis with respect to Allegra. Generally, the provisions for licensing, milestone and royalty payments included in our contracts are related to the occurrence of specific identifiable events. The Company recognizes revenues from licensing fees over the estimated life of the agreement to which the licensing fees relate

38



or when our commitment to perform services under the agreement has been fulfilled. Milestones are recognized into revenues when the milestone has been achieved, collection of the milestone is probable and the Company's performance obligation has been met. The Company recognized royalty revenues in the period in which the related product sale occurs.

Cash Equivalents and Short-Term Investment:

        Cash equivalents consist of money market accounts and overnight deposits. For purposes of the consolidated statements of cash flows, the Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts:

        The Company records an allowance for doubtful accounts to absorb estimated receivable losses. The allowance and related accounts receivable are reduced when the account is deemed uncollectible.

Inventory:

        Inventory consists primarily of commercially available fine chemicals used as raw materials in the research and production process and chemical compounds in the form of natural product and novel compound libraries. The Company capitalizes the costs associated with the production of its novel compound libraries. Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out basis) or market. Through December 31, 2002, revenue from library sales have not been significant. The Company writes down inventories for obsolescence equal to the difference between the cost of inventory and the estimated market value based upon assumptions about future demand and market conditions, which could result in a charge to operations.

Investment Securities:

        The Company accounts for its investment securities in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 115, "Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities." Investment securities consist of state and political subdivision obligations, corporate debt obligations, and bond mutual funds, with the Company holding all of these securities as available-for-sale.

        Unrealized holding gains and losses, net of related tax effect, on available-for-sale securities are excluded from earnings and are reported as a separate component of stockholders' equity until realized. Interest income is recognized when earned. Realized gains and losses for securities classified as available-for-sale are included in earnings and are determined using the specific identification method.

Property and Equipment:

        Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are expensed when incurred. When assets are sold, retired, or otherwise disposed of, the applicable costs

39



and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and the resulting gain or loss is recognized.

        Depreciation is determined using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the individual assets. Accelerated methods of depreciation have been used for income tax purposes.

        The Company provides for depreciation of property and equipment over the following estimated useful lives:

Laboratory equipment and fixtures   7-18 years
Office equipment   3-7 years
Computer equipment   3-5 years
Leasehold improvements   18 years
Buildings   25 years

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets:

        Long-lived assets and certain identified intangible assets to be held and used are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. Determination of recoverability is based on an estimate of undiscounted future cash flows resulting from the use of the asset and its eventual disposal. Measurement of an impairment loss for long-lived assets and certain identified intangible assets that management expects to hold and use are based on the fair value of the asset. Long-lived assets and certain identified intangible assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of carrying amount of fair value less costs to sell.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets:

        The excess purchase price over fair values assigned to net assets acquired (goodwill) had been amortized on a straight-line basis over 15 to 20 years. Beginning in 2002, the Company adopted the provisions of FAS No. 142 "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" which eliminated the prior practice of goodwill amortization and instead adopted an impairment-only approach. Goodwill and other long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events such as significant changes in the business climate, changes in product offerings, or other circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. In accordance with FAS No. 142, the Company performs a test for goodwill impairment at least annually during the second quarter of the year.

Patents and Patent Application Costs:

        The costs of patents issued and acquired are being amortized on the straight-line method over the estimated remaining lives of the issued patents, generally 17 years. Patent application and processing costs are capitalized and will be amortized over the estimated life once a patent is acquired or expensed in the period the patent application is denied.

        Accumulated amortization at December 31, 2001 and 2002 was $32 and $60, respectively.

40



Licensing Rights:

        Licensing costs are accumulated and amortized once the license agreement is executed. The costs of licensing rights are being amortized on the straight-line method over the term of the license agreement. Licensing costs are written off in the period the licensing rights are canceled or are determined not to provide future benefits.

        Accumulated amortization at December 31, 2001 and 2002 was $12 and $12, respectively.

Research and Development:

        Research and development costs are charged to operations when incurred and are included in operating expenses.

Income Taxes:

        Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the income tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

Stock-Based Compensation:

        The Company applies the intrinsic value-based method of accounting prescribed by Accounting Principles Board ("APB") Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees," and related interpretations, in accounting for its fixed plan stock options. As such, compensation expense would be recorded only if, on the date of grant, the current market price of the underlying stock exceeded the exercise price. Any compensation expense would be recognized over the vesting period.

Earnings Per Share:

        Basic earnings per share computed by dividing income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in the earnings of the Company (such as stock options).

41



        The following tables provide basic and diluted earnings per share calculations:

 
  Year Ended December 31, 2000
  Year Ended December 31, 2001
  Year Ended December 31, 2002
 
  Net Income
  Weighted
Average
Shares

  Per Share
Amount

  Net Income
  Weighted
Average
Shares

  Per Share
Amount

  Net Income
  Weighted
Average
Shares

  Per Share
Amount

Basic earnings per share   $ 23,593   30,363   $ 0.78   $ 34,394   33,065   $ 1.04   $ 40,551   32,632   $ 1.24
             
           
           
Dilutive effect of stock options       1,700             1,089             677      
   
 
       
 
       
 
     
Diluted earnings per share   $ 23,593   32,063   $ 0.74   $ 34,394   34,154   $ 1.01   $ 40,551   33,309   $ 1.22
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

        The amount of anti-dilutive options and warrants outstanding were 14, 428 and 1,452 for the years ended December 31, 2000, 2001 and 2002, respectively.

Use of Management Estimates:

        The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities, at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results can vary from these estimates.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements:

        In July 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations and No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.

        SFAS No. 141 requires that all business combinations be accounted for using the purchase method of accounting; use of the pooling-of-interests method is prohibited. Goodwill will initially be recognized as an asset and measured as the excess of the cost of the acquired entity over the net of the amounts assigned to assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Intangible assets other than goodwill will be recognized as an asset apart from goodwill if that asset arises from contractual or other legal rights. The Statement will apply to all business combinations initiated or completed after June 30, 2001. The adoption of SFAS No. 141 on January 1, 2002 did not have a material impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

        SFAS No. 142 requires that goodwill (including goodwill reported on the separate GAAP financial statements of a subsidiary) will not be amortized but will be tested for impairment at least annually at the reporting unit level. Goodwill will be tested for impairment by comparing the fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying amount, including goodwill with an impairment loss recorded for excess goodwill, if any. Intangible assets will be amortized over their estimated useful lives and will be tested at least annually for impairment in accordance with SFAS No. 121. Intangible assets with an indefinite useful life will not be amortized until its life is determined to be no longer indefinite. SFAS No. 142 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001. The adoption of SFAS No. 142 on January 1, 2002 resulted in reduced amortization expense of approximately $1.5 million in the Company's consolidated statement of income for the year ended December 31, 2002.

42



        In August 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations. SFAS No. 143 requires the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation to be recognized in the period in which it is incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. The associated asset retirement costs are capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the long-lived asset. SFAS No. 143 is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2002. We believe the adoption of SFAS No. 143 Statement will not have a material impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

        In August 2001, the FASB also issued SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, which supersedes SFAS No. 121, Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of, and the accounting and reporting provisions of APB No. 30. SFAS No. 144 addresses financial accounting and reporting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets and is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of SFAS No. 144 on January 1, 2002 did not have a material impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

        In May 2002, the FASB issued Statement No. 145, "Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB 13, and Technical Corrections as of April, 2002." This statement rescinds previously issued pronouncements relating to reporting gains and losses from extinguishments of debt to satisfy sinking-fund requirements, and accounting for intangible assets of motor carriers, amends the pronouncement on accounting for leases, and also amends various other pronouncements to make various technical corrections, clarify meanings, or describe their applicability under changed conditions. The Company does not believe that this statement will have a material impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

        In July 2002, the FASB issued Statement No. 146 "Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities." This statement requires companies to recognize costs associated with exit or disposal activities when they are incurred rather than at the date of a commitment to an exit or disposal plan. Examples of costs covered by the statement include lease termination costs and certain employee severance costs that are associated with a restructuring, discontinued operation, plant closing, or other exit or disposal activity. Previous accounting guidance was provided by EITF Issue No. 94-3, "Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring)." Statement 146 replaces Issue 94-3 and is effective for all exit activities after December 31, 2002. The Company does not believe the adoption of this statement will have a material impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

        In November 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Interpretation No. 45, Guarantor's Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others ("FIN 45"). FIN 45 elaborates on the disclosures to be made by a guarantor in its interim and annual financial statements about its obligations under certain guarantees that it has issued. It also clarifies that a guarantor is required to recognize, at the inception of a guarantee, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee. FIN 45 does not prescribe a specific approach for subsequently measuring the guarantor's recognized liability over the

43



term of the related guarantee. It also incorporates without change, the guidance in FASB Interpretation No. 34, Disclosure of Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others, which is being superseded. The initial recognition and initial measurement provisions of FIN 45 are applicable on a prospective basis to guarantees issues or modified after December 31, 2002, irrespective of the guarantor's fiscal year-end. The disclosure requirements in FIN 45 are effective for financial statements of interim or annual periods ending after December 15, 2002. The Company does not expect this interpretation to have a material impact on its financial statements.

        In December 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation—Transition and Disclosure, which amends FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. SFAS 148 introduces two additional methods of transition for those companies that adopt SFAS 123's provisions for fair value recognition. The first method, the Modified Prospective Approach, would allow the Company to prospectively apply the provisions of SFAS 123 to all new awards and to the unvested portions of awards that have been granted since the effective date of SFAS 123. The second method, the Limited Retrospective Approach, is the same as the Modified Prospective Approach except that all prior period financial statements would be restated as if SFAS 123 had been adopted for recognition purposes as of its effective date. The Company can elect not to apply these two additional methods and continue it's fair value recognition under the provisions of SFAS 123. SFAS 148 requires the disclosures required in annual statements under SFAS 123 to be included in interim financial statements. The guidance and provisions for interim and annual disclosures under SFAS 148 are effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2002. The Company has elected to continue using the provisions for fair value recognition in SFAS 123. The Company has included required disclosures under SFAS 148 in its financial statements.

        In January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Interpretation No. 46, "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities". FIN 46 provides guidance that determines conditions as to whether consolidation of a Variable Interest Entity is required. The requirements of FIN 46 are applicable to preexisting entities as of the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. Transition disclosure requirements of FIN 46 are required in all financial statements of interim or annual periods ending after February 1, 2003. The Company does not expect this interpretation to have a material impact on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

2. Business Combinations

Great Lakes Chemical Corporation Mt. Prospect Facility

        On September 21, 2001, the Company consummated its acquisition of Great Lakes Chemical Corporation's laboratory facility in Mount Prospect, Illinois for approximately $10,000 in cash. The results of operations for this business have been included in the consolidated financial statements since the acquisition date. The facility has a total of eighty-eight thousand square feet of laboratory and support space and is located on 5.5 acres of land. The facility includes chemistry synthesis labs, which contain 55 fully equipped scientific workstations; a two-bay, non-GMP chemical pilot plant; research fermentation facilities; associated analytical support; scale-up fermentation capacity; and supporting

44



office space. The purchase provides the Company with a modern facility, fully equipped with a scientific staff of approximately fifty people with opportunities for expansion. Pro forma information has not been provided because the acquisition is not material.

        The following table summarizes the allocation of the purchase price to the estimated fair values of the assets acquired at the date of acquisition:

Property, plant and equipment   $ 9,000
Goodwill     1,242
   
  Total assets acquired     10,242
Current liabilities     242
   
  Net assets acquired   $ 10,000
   

45


New Chemical Entities

        On January 25, 2001, the Company consummated its acquisition of New Chemical Entities, Inc. (NCE) of Bothell, Washington for approximately $23,000 of which $22,400 was in cash and $600 in assumed shareholder debt which was repaid at the closing. NCE, renamed AMRI Bothell Research Center, is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. The excess purchase price over the fair value of the net assets acquired, has been recorded as goodwill. Amortization expense for the year ended December 31, 2001 was approximately $995.

        The purchase price of $22,400 has been allocated as follows:

Cash   $ 19
Accounts receivable, net     255
Chemical libraries     3,759
Other current assets     55
Property and equipment     2,233
Deferred tax assets     1,926
Intangible assets     4,511
Goodwill     14,237
Other assets     459
   
Total assets   $ 27,454
   
Accounts payable and accrued expenses   $ 989
Unearned revenue     235
Long-term debt, current     428
Deferred taxes     1,942
Long-term debt, less current portion     1,460
   
Total liabilities     5,054
   
Net assets   $ 22,400
   

        Had the acquisition occurred on January 1, 2000 unaudited proforma net income and basic and diluted earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 2000 would have been $19,201 and $0.64 and $0.60. Pro forma information has not been presented for 2001 because the acquisition occurred on January 25, 2001 and the results of operations prior to that date were not significant.

American Advanced Organics

        On February 4, 2000, the Company consummated its acquisition of American Advanced Organics, Inc. (AAO) of Syracuse, New York, for approximately $1,000 in cash and $1,300 in common stock (50 shares) and stock options of the Company. The Company also assumed approximately $740 in liabilities. In addition to the $2,300 purchase price, the former AAO stockholders received an additional $500 in cash subsequent to December 31, 2000 based upon AAO's financial performance in 2000. Based on the financial performance of AAO in 2001, the former AAO stockholders received an

46



additional $300 in cash subsequent to December 31, 2001 representing the final payment under the purchase agreement with the AAO stockholders. The excess purchase price over the net assets acquired was approximately $2,100. Amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2000 and 2001 was approximately $132 and $178, respectively.

3. Inventory

        Inventory consisted of the following at December 31, 2001 and 2002:

 
  December 31,
 
  2001
  2002
Raw materials   $ 1,992   $ 3,426
Work in process     833     6,381
Finished goods     3,648     3,595
   
 
Total   $ 6,473   $ 13,402
   
 

        At December 31, 2001 and 2002, the Company had inventory of libraries included in work in progress of $661 and $5,186 and in finished goods of $3,648 and $3,595, respectively.

4. Investment in Organichem

        (a)    Stock Purchase Agreement

        On December 21, 1999, the Company completed an equity method investment in Organichem Corporation ("Organichem") pursuant to a Stock Purchase Agreement and purchased convertible subordinated debentures of Organichem pursuant to a Debenture Purchase Agreement. Under the terms of the Stock Purchase Agreement, the Company acquired shares of common stock of Organichem representing 37.5% of Organichem's outstanding common stock, for an aggregate purchase price of $15,131, which included direct costs of $131 attributable to the Organichem equity investment. During 2000, Organichem purchased a portion of its common stock into treasury, increasing the Company's ownership interest in Organichem to 39.2%. As a result, the Company recorded a one time benefit to earnings of $159, net of taxes of $98.

        The Company has recorded its investment using the equity method of accounting and, accordingly, has recorded the Company's proportionate share of Organichem's income, as adjusted for intercompany interest, for the period since the initial investment through December 31, 2002, and by amortizing the excess cost of its investment in the common stock over the underlying equity in the net assets of Organichem through December 31, 2001. Upon adoption of FAS 142 the Company ceased amortizing the goodwill on this investment. The acquisition cost exceeded the Company's share of the underlying equity in net assets of Organichem by $9,375.

47



        Summarized financial information of Organichem as of and for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2002 is as follows:

 
  December 31,
2001

  December 31,
2002

Current assets   $ 26,042   $ 32,813
Property, plant and equipment, net     48,906     57,774
Total assets     75,797     91,182
Current liabilities     21,614     39,764
Other liabilities     35,819     11,387
Total equity     18,364     25,031
Total liabilities and equity     75,797     91,182

Net sales

 

$

68,204

 

$

86,239
Gross profit     16,667     20,658
Operating income     10,189     13,317
Net income     4,139     7,559

        The Stock Purchase Agreement also incorporated a Put/Call Agreement among the Company, Organichem and its stockholders that permits the Company to purchase, at the Company's option, all of the outstanding shares of common stock of Organichem within 90 days subsequent to the year ending December 31, 2002. The purchase price is to be determined based on Organichem's earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization ("EBITDA"), as defined in the Put/Call Agreement, for the year ending December 31, 2002, with a minimum and maximum specified purchase price of $15,000 and $30,000, respectively.

        On February 12, 2003, the Company exercised its call option under the Put/Call Agreement and acquired all of the outstanding common stock of Organichem for $29.9 million in cash. See Note 18.

        (b)    Debenture Purchase Agreement

        Under the terms of the Debenture Purchase Agreement, the Company purchased convertible subordinated debentures ("Debentures") for an aggregate purchase price of $15,000. The Company converted the debentures into additional shares of common stock on January 1, 2003, thereby increasing the Company's ownership interest to 76.7%. The Debentures had an original maturity date of December 21, 2005. The Debentures were convertible, at the Company's option, at any time after the earliest of (i) December 21, 2000; (ii) notification by Organichem to the Company that Organichem intends to repay the Debenture prior to its maturity; or (iii) the occurrence of an event of default as defined in the Debenture Purchase Agreement. See Note 18.

        The Debentures bear interest, payable semi-annually, on the unpaid principal amount at margins over specified fixed or variable London Interbank Offer Rate ("LIBOR") as provided for within the Company's credit agreement with Organichem (5.960% and 4.105% at December 31, 2001 and 2002, respectively). The agreement provided that the interest payable under the Debentures through December 21, 2000 shall be added to the principal of the Debenture, with semi-annual cash interest payments to begin subsequent to December 21, 2000, provided that Organichem is in compliance with

48



the financial covenants of its credit agreement. Accrued interest through December 21, 2000 totaling $1,436 was added to the principal of the Debentures. In addition, pursuant to the terms of the Debenture Purchase Agreement, the Company and Organichem have agreed that in the event that either the aforementioned put or call options are exercised, 62.5% of the accrued interest not paid by Organichem as of the date of the put or call exercise shall be applied to reduce the purchase price as determined under the Put/Call Agreement. Accrued interest receivable from Organichem at December 31, 2001 and 2002 totaled $24 and $19, respectively.

5. Investment Securities, Available-for-sale

        The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains, gross unrealized losses and fair value for available-for-sale investment securities by major security type were as follows:

 
  December 31, 2001
 
  Amortized Cost
  Gross Unrealized Gains
  Gross Unrealized Losses
  Fair Value
Obligations of states and political subdivisions   $ 8,322   $ 164   $   $ 8,486
Corporate debt obligations     80,053     407         80,460
   
 
 
 
    $ 88,375   $ 571   $   $ 88,946
   
 
 
 
 
  December 31, 2002
 
  Amortized Cost
  Gross Unrealized Gains
  Gross Unrealized Losses
  Fair Value
Obligations of states and political subdivisions   $ 51,695   $ 173   $ (12 ) $ 51,856
Corporate debt obligations     42,601     251     (9 )   42,843
   
 
 
 
    $ 94,296   $ 424   $ (21 ) $ 94,699
   
 
 
 

        Proceeds from the sale of an available-for-sale investment security were $92 in 2000, resulting in a realized gain of $3. There were no sales of available-for-sale investment securities in 2001 and 2002.

        Maturities of corporate debt obligations and obligations of states and political subdivisions classified as available-for-sale at December 31, 2001 and 2002 were as follows:

 
  December 31, 2001
  December 31, 2002
 
  Amortized Cost
  Fair Value
  Amortized Cost
  Fair Value
Due less than one year   $ 39,741   $ 39,921   $ 61,804   $ 62,092
Due after one year through five years     48,487     48,868     32,343     32,439
Due after five years through ten years     147     157     149     168
Due after ten years                
   
 
 
 
    $ 88,375   $ 88,946   $ 94,296   $ 94,699
   
 
 
 

49


6. Property and Equipment

        Property and equipment consists of the following:

 
  December 31,
 
 
  2001
  2002
 
Laboratory equipment and fixtures   $ 31,131   $ 45,420  
Office equipment     5,042     7,085  
Leasehold improvements     10,152     15,451  
Construction-in-progress     15,083     7,631  
Buildings     7,168     10,348  
Land     1,368     1,396  
   
 
 
      69,944     87,331  
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization     (10,188 )   (14,813 )
   
 
 
    $ 59,756   $ 72,518  
   
 
 

        Depreciation and amortization expense of property and equipment was $2,207, $3,801 and $4,625 for the years ended December 31, 2000, 2001 and 2002, respectively.

7. Long-term Debt and Capital Leases

        The Company has a revolving line of credit agreement ("Credit Agreement") with a bank enabling the Company to borrow up to $25,000. The Credit Agreement provides for various covenants, including requirements for the Company to maintain defined financial ratios and the prohibition against any additional debt, other than in the normal course of business, exceeding $20,000 in the aggregate, at any time. This line of credit was replaced with a new line of credit entered into in connection with the Organichem acquisition. See Note 18.

        At December 31, 2001 and 2002, the Company had no outstanding indebtedness and borrowing availability of $25,000 under the Credit Agreement.

50



        Long-term debt is comprised as follows:

 
  December 31,
 
  2001
  2002
Variable interest rate industrial development authority bonds due in increasing annual installments through 2021. Interest payments are due monthly, with a current interest rate of 1.55%   $ 5,700   $ 5,487
Note payable to financing company in monthly installments of $1 through 2004     26     9
   
 
      5,726     5,496
Less current portion     218     215
   
 
    $ 5,508   $ 5,281
   
 

        The aggregate maturities of long-term debt subsequent to December 31, 2002 are as follows:

2003   $ 215
2004     234
2005     230
2006     240
2007     245
Thereafter     4,332
   
    $ 5,496
   

        In connection with the Company's acquisition of NCE in January 2001, the Company assumed the existing capital leases of NCE. The leased equipment consists of the following:

 
  Asset Balance at
December 31,

 
 
  2001
  2002
 
Laboratory equipment   $ 1,250   $ 1,250  
Less accumulated amortization     (183 )   (383 )
   
 
 
    $ 1,067   $ 867  
   
 
 

51


        Future minimum lease payments under capital lease as of December 31, 2002 are as follows:

Total minimum lease payments   $ 520  
Less: Amount representing interest     (30 )
   
 
Present value of minimum lease payments     490  
Current portion     490  
   
 
Long-term portion   $  

8. Income Taxes

        Income tax expense (benefit) consists of the following:

 
  Year Ended December 31,
 
  2000
  2001
  2002
Current:                  
  Federal   $ 12,147   $ 17,481   $ 18,790
  State     593     484     485
   
 
 
      12,740     17,965     19,275
   
 
 

Deferred:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
  Federal     1,190     1,519     2,911
  State     159     223     500
   
 
 
      1,349     1,742     3,411
   
 
 
    $ 14,089   $ 19,707   $ 22,686
   
 
 

        The differences between income tax expense and income taxes computed using a federal statutory rate of 35% for the years ended December 31, 2000, 2001 and 2002, were as follows:

 
  Year Ended December 31,
 
 
  2000
  2001
  2002
 
Pre-tax income at statutory rate   $ 13,188   $ 18,935   $ 22,133  
Increase (reduction) in taxes resulting from:                    
  Tax-free interest income     (32 )   (249 )   (333 )
  State taxes, net of federal benefit     489     459     640  
  Other, net     444     562     246  
   
 
 
 
    $ 14,089   $ 19,707   $ 22,686  
   
 
 
 

52


        The tax effects of temporary differences giving rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:

 
  December 31,
 
 
  2001
  2002
 
Deferred tax assets:              
  Accruals   $ 154   $ 121  
  Amortization     305     305  
  Lease costs     51     43  
  Inventory     59     88  
  Interest     276     376  
  Other     181     306  
  Research and experimentation credit carryforwards     174     174  
  Net operating loss carryforwards     1,709     1,320  
   
 
 
    Deferred tax assets     2,909     2,733  
Deferred tax liabilities:              
  Property and equipment depreciation differences (accelerated depreciation for tax purposes)     (3,560 )   (5,579 )
  Non-taxable equity earnings     (1,120 )   (2,340 )
   
 
 
    Net deferred tax liability   $ (1,771 ) $ (5,186 )
   
 
 

        The preceding table does not include the deferred tax (liability) asset of ($200) and $58 at December 31, 2001 and 2002, associated with the Company's unrealized gain (loss) on investment securities, available-for-sale, discussed in Note 5.

        The Company's net operating loss carryforwards begin to expire in 2015. As a result of the change in control related to the EnzyMed merger, the Company's use of the net operating loss carryforwards is limited to approximately $1,000 per year.

        In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income and the taxable income in the two previous tax years to which tax loss carryback can be applied. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, taxable income in the carryback period and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. Based upon the level of projected future taxable income over the periods in which the deferred tax assets are deductible, management believes it is more likely than not that the Company will realize the benefits of those deductible differences. The amount of the deferred tax asset considered realizable could be reduced if estimates of future taxable income during the carryforward period are reduced.

9. Stockholders' Equity

        During the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2002, the Company repurchased 20 shares at a cost of $451 and 1,098 shares at a cost of $23,228, respectively.

53



        On October 5, 2000, the Company completed a follow-on offering of its common stock by issuing 3,000 shares at a price of $42.25 per share, less the underwriters discount of $7,290. The net proceeds of the offering, after deducting applicable direct offering costs of $843 were $118,617. A portion of the net proceeds has been used in the acquisition of New Chemical Entities, Inc. (See Note 2).

        On July 20, 2000, the Board of Directors approved a 2-for-1 split of the Company's common stock to stockholders of record as of August 8, 2000. All shares and per share information included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements have been restated to reflect the stock split.

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

        The Company's 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the "Plan") was adopted during August 1998. Up to 600 shares of common stock may be issued under the Plan, which is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. It established two stock offering periods per calendar year, the first beginning on January 1 and ending on June 30, and the second beginning on July 1 and ending December 31. All employees who work more than 20 hours per week are eligible for participation in the Plan. Employees who are deemed to own greater than 5% of the combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company are not eligible for participation in the Plan.

        During each offering, an employee may purchase shares under the Plan by authorizing payroll deductions up to 10% of their cash compensation during the offering period. The maximum number of shares to be issued to any single employee during an offering period is limited to one thousand. At the end of the offering period, the accumulated payroll deductions will be used to purchase common stock on the last business day of the offering period at a price equal to 85% of the fair market value of the common stock on the first or last day of the offering period, whichever is lower. During the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2002 employees purchased 18 and 34 shares, respectively.

Stock Option Plan

        The Company has a Stock Option Plan, through which the Company may issue incentive stock options or non-qualified stock options. Incentive stock options granted to employees may not be granted at prices less than 100% of the fair market value of the Company's common stock at the date of option grant. Non-qualified stock options may be granted to employees, directors, advisors, consultants and other key persons of the Company at prices established at the date of grant, and may be less than the fair market value at the date of grant. All incentive stock options may be exercised at any time, after vesting, over a ten-year period subsequent to the date of grant. Incentive stock options generally vest over five years, with a 60% vesting occurring at the end of the third anniversary of the grant date, 20% at the end of the fourth anniversary of the grant date and 20% at the end of the fifth anniversary of the grant date. Non-qualified stock option vesting terms are established at the date of grant, but shall have a duration of not more than ten years.

54



        Following is a summary of the status of stock option programs during 2000, 2001 and 2002:

 
  Year Ended December 31,
 
  2000
  2001
  2002
 
  Number of
Shares

  Weighted
Exercise
Price

  Number of
Shares

  Weighted
Exercise
Price

  Number of
Shares

  Weighted
Exercise
Price

Outstanding, beginning of year   2,183   $ 3.23   2,112   $ 9.56   2,364   $ 17.56
  Granted   572     26.72   661     37.24   449     24.49
  Exercised   (532 )   1.37   (320 )   1.84   (284 )   2.59
  Forfeited   (111 )   11.34   (89 )   32.23   (102 )   28.86
   
       
       
     
Outstanding, end of year   2,112     9.56   2,364     17.56   2,427     20.21
   
       
       
     

Options exercisable, end of year

 

817

 

 

 

 

788

 

 

 

 

844

 

 

 
   
       
       
     

Weighted-average fair value of options granted during the year

 

 

 

$

13.08

 

 

 

$

17.04

 

 

 

$

15.01
       
     
     

        The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding as of December 31, 2001:

 
   
  Outstanding Options
  Exercisable Options
Range of Option
Exercise Prices

  Number
Outstanding

  Weighted-Average
Remaining
Contractual Life

  Weighted-Average
Exercise Price

  Number
Exercisable

  Weighted-Average
Exercise Price

$ 0.06-  6.58   976   5.4 years   $ 2.23   776   $ 2.18
$ 6.59-13.12   253   7.2 years     10.03   4     10.25
$ 13.13-19.66   9   3.0 years     15.07   5     15.02
$ 19.67-26.20   505   8.6 years     24.56   0     0.00
$ 26.21-32.74   136   8.8 years     27.93   0     0.00
$ 32.75-39.27   88   9.0 years     34.61   0     0.00
$ 39.28-45.81   367   9.1 years     43.23   0     0.00
$ 45.82-52.35   23   8.5 years     48.80   3     48.62
$ 52.36-58.89   5   8.9 years     54.88   0     0.00
$ 58.90-65.44   2   9.0 years     65.44   0     0.00
     
           
     
      2,364             788      
     
           
     

55


        The following summarizes information about stock options outstanding as of December 31, 2002:

 
   
  Outstanding Options
  Exercisable Options
Range of Option
Exercise Prices

  Number
Outstanding

  Weighted-Average
Remaining
Contractual Life

  Weighted-Average
Exercise Price

  Number
Exercisable

  Weighted-Average
Exercise Price

$ 0.06-$  6.54   700   4.50   $ 2.27   663   $ 2.20
$ 6.54-$13.09   233   6.18   $ 10.03   135   $ 10.03
$ 13.09-$19.63   32   7.47   $ 17.03   9   $ 15.05
$ 19.63-$26.18   856   8.32   $ 24.66   11   $ 23.75
$ 26.18-$32.72   145   7.91   $ 27.82   1   $ 28.66
$ 32.72-$39.26   84   8.03   $ 34.67   18   $ 35.19
$ 39.26-$45.81   348   8.09   $ 43.22   1   $ 41.84
$ 45.81-$52.35   22   7.45   $ 48.60   6   $ 48.55
$ 52.35-$58.89   5   7.87   $ 54.84   0   $ 0.00
$ 58.89-$65.44   2   7.99   $ 65.44   0   $ 0.00
     
           
     
      2,427   7.66   $ 20.21   844   $ 4.98
     
           
     

        The following are the shares of common stock reserved for issuance at December 31, 2002:

 
  Number of
Shares

Employee Stock Option Plans   4,486
Employee Stock Purchase Plan   529
   
Shares reserved for issuance   5,015
   

        Under SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock Based Compensation, compensation cost for stock option grants would be based on the fair value at the grant date, and the resulting compensation expense would be shown as an expense on the consolidated statements of income. Had compensation cost for these plans been determined consistent with SFAS No. 123, the Company's net income and earnings per share would have been reduced to the following pro-forma amounts:

 
  Year Ended December 31,
 
  2000
  2001
  2002
Net income:                  
  As reported   $ 23,593   $ 34,394   $ 40,551
  Pro forma   $ 22,869   $ 32,369   $ 38,188
Earnings per share:                  
  Basic as reported   $ 0.78   $ 1.04   $ 1.24
  Basic pro forma   $ 0.75   $ 0.98   $ 1.17
  Diluted as reported   $ 0.74   $ 1.01   $ 1.22
  Diluted pro forma   $ 0.71   $ 0.95   $ 1.15

56


        The per share weighted-average fair value of stock options granted is determined using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions.

 
  2000
  2001
  2002
 
Expected Life (years):              
  ISO   4   4   5  
  Non-qualified   4   4   5  
Interest rate   6.48 % 4.39 % 3.03 %
Volatility   60.60 % 71.20 % 71.29 %
Dividend yield        

Shareholder Rights Plan

        The Company has adopted a Shareholder Rights Plan, the purpose of which is, among other things, to enhance the Board's ability to protect shareholder interests and to ensure that shareholders receive fair treatment in the event any coercive takeover attempt of the Company is made in the future. The Shareholder Rights Plan could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire, or could discourage a third party from acquiring, the Company or a large block of the Company's Common Stock. The following summary description of the Shareholder Rights Plan does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Company's Shareholder Rights Plan, which has been previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to a Registration Statement on Form 8-A.

        In connection with the adoption of the Shareholder Rights Plan, the Board of Directors of the Company declared a dividend distribution of one preferred stock purchase right (a "Right") for each outstanding share of Common Stock to stockholders of record as of the close of business on September 19, 2002. The Rights currently are not exercisable and are attached to and trade with the outstanding shares of Common Stock. Under the Shareholder Rights Plan, the Rights become exercisable if a person becomes an "acquiring person" by acquiring 15% or more of the outstanding shares of Common Stock or if a person commences a tender offer that would result in that person owning 15% or more of the Common Stock. A stockholder owning 15% or more of the common stock of the Company as of September 19, 2002, is "grandfathered" under the Shareholder Rights Plan and will become an "acquiring person" upon acquiring an additional 1/2% of the Common Stock. If a person becomes an "acquiring person," each holder of a Right (other than the acquiring person) would be entitled to purchase, at the then-current exercise price, such number of shares of the Company's preferred stock which are equivalent to shares of Common Stock having twice the exercise price of the Right. If the Company is acquired in a merger or other business combination transaction after any such event, each holder of a Right would then be entitled to purchase, at the then-current exercise price, shares of the acquiring company's common stock having a value of twice the exercise price of the Right.

57



Stock Purchase Warrants

        In March 2002, the Company issued warrants to purchase 53 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $40 for 26 shares and $45 for 27 shares to Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMS) in connection with an agreement entered into with BMS. Such warrants, which had a value of $500 on the date of issuance, were charged to operations with a corresponding credit to stockholders' equity. The value of warrants issued was determined using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions.

Expected Life (years)   5.0  
Interest rate   4.18 %
Volatility   62.00 %
Dividend yield    

        Under that agreement, BMS transferred intellectual property to the Company, consisting of one of BMS's late-stage pre-clinical drug candidates, along with patent applications covering Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and central nervous system indications related both to this candidate and structural analogs. If the Company is successful in out-licensing this intellectual property to a third-party, the Company will be required to issue additional warrants to purchase common stock to BMS with a value of up to $2,500. Alternatively, the Company may elect to retain the intellectual property for internal development, at which time the Company would be required to issue the additional warrants to BMS. The Company may also opt to return the intellectual property to BMS within eighteen months of the original agreement. Under this scenario the Company would not be required to issue the additional warrants.

58


10. Employee Benefit Plan

        The Company maintains a savings and profit sharing plan under section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code covering all eligible employees. Employees must complete one calendar month of service and be over 20.5 years of age as of the plan's entry dates. Participants may contribute up to 15% of their compensation, subject to IRS limitations. The Company currently makes matching contributions equal to 50% of the participant's contributions (up to a limit of 6% of the participant's compensation). In addition, the Company has reserved the right to make discretionary profit sharing contributions to employee accounts. The Company has made no discretionary profit sharing contributions. Employer matching contributions vest at a rate of 20% per year beginning after two years of participation in the plan. Employer matching contributions were $272, $436 and $608 for the years ended December 31, 2000, 2001 and 2002, respectively.

11. Lease Commitments

        The Company leases both facilities and equipment used in its operations and classifies those leases as operating leases following the provisions of SFAS No. 13, Accounting for Leases.

        The Company has long-term operating leases for its Albany, New York office and laboratory facilities with a shareholder of the Company. The present leases expire in December 2013. The leases contain a renewal option at the option of the Company. The Company is responsible for paying the cost of utilities, operating costs, and increases in property taxes.

        The Company leases additional laboratory facilities under separate agreements with non-related parties. The Company also leases various equipment with terms ranging from three to five years.

        Future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases (with initial or remaining lease terms in excess of one year) as of December 31, 2002 are as follows:

 
  Related
Party

  Other
  Total
Year ending December 31                  
2003   $ 846   $ 1,517   $ 2,363
2004     1,021     1,322     2,343
2005     1,021     1,139     2,160
2006     1,021     1,166     2,187
2007     1,084     1,002     2,086
Thereafter     5,814     1,316     7,130

        Rental expense amounted to approximately $1,048, $1,635 and $1,922 during the years ended December 31, 2000, 2001 and 2002, respectively. Included within rent expense was approximately $275, $275 and $709 that was paid to the aforementioned related party of the Company during the years ended December 31, 2000, 2001 and 2002, respectively.

59



12. Related Party Transactions

        In 1993, the Company adopted a Technology Development Incentive Plan to provide a method to stimulate and encourage novel innovative technology development. To be eligible to participate, the individual must be an employee of the Company and must be the inventor or co-inventor of novel technology that results in new revenues generated for, or by, the Company. Eligible participants will share in awards based on a percentage of the licensing, royalty or milestone revenue received by the Company, as defined by the Plan.

        In 2000, 2001 and 2002, the Company awarded Technology Incentive Compensation to the inventor of the terfenadine carboxylic acid metabolite technology. The inventor is a director, officer and shareholder of the Company. The amounts awarded and included in the consolidated statements of income for the years ended December 31, 2000, 2001 and 2002 are $2,921, $4,165 and $5,107, respectively. Included in accrued compensation in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2001 and 2002 are unpaid Technology Development Incentive Compensation awards of $1,241 and $1,327, respectively.

        As described in Note 11, the Company currently has long-term operating leases for its Albany, New York office and laboratory facilities with a shareholder of the Company.

        From time to time the Company makes loans to employees of the Company in the form of notes receivable. The notes receivable and accrued interest will not be repaid to the Company provided the employee remains in the employ of the Company throughout the term of the loan. If employment is terminated prior to the end of the loan term, a pro-rata portion of the principal and interest shall be repaid to the Company. Notes receivable from employees at December 31, 2001 and 2002 totaled $455 and $339, respectively. The amounts forgiven and charged to operations in the consolidated statements of income for the years ended December 31, 2000, 2001 and 2002 are $20, $20 and $200, respectively.

        A member of the Company's board of directors is the Chief Executive Officer of one of the providers of telephone and internet services to the Company. This telecommunications company was paid $89 and $162 for services rendered to the Company in 2001 and 2002, respectively.

13. Royalty & Licensing Arrangement

        On March 15, 1995, the Company entered into a License Agreement and a Stock Purchase Agreement with Marion Merrell Dow Inc., now part of Aventis, S.A. ("Aventis"). Under the terms of the Stock Purchase Agreement, the Company sold 3,254 shares of the Company's common stock to Aventis for $2,000. Under the terms of the License Agreement, the Company granted Aventis an exclusive, worldwide license, with the right to grant sublicenses, upon the prior written consent of the Company, to any patents issued to the Company related to its original terfenadine carboxylic acid metabolite patent application. Terfenadine carboxylic acid metabolite is the active ingredient in the

60



non-sedating antihistamine fexofenadine HCl, marketed as a prescription medicine by Aventis, under the brand names "Allegra" in the Americas and "Telfast" in the rest of the world. In return for the license, Aventis agreed to pay the Company up to $6,500 based upon the achievement of five patenting milestones and future royalties based on sales of fexofenadine HCl. The five patenting milestones consisted of:

        In November 1996, the Company was awarded a U.S. patent that satisfied the U.S. "Substantially Pure Claim." However, under the terms of the Agreement, Aventis had the right to institute action to provoke an interference claim and, upon successfully doing so, was not obligated to pay any milestones or royalties until, and if, the interference was resolved in favor of the Company. In February 1998, the United States Patent and Trademark Office ("PTO") Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences rendered a decision that the Company was first to make the invention and confirming that the Company was properly awarded the aforementioned patent. Accordingly, in the first six months of 1998, the Company received and recognized the associated milestone payment and royalties on all sales of fexofenadine HCl (Allegra) in the United States from November 26, 1996 through December 31, 1997, as stipulated in the Agreement. The total payment was $6,300. Because of the decision that the Company was first to make the invention, the Company is entitled to receive royalties on all subsequent sales of fexofenadine HCl (Allegra) in the United States through the respective patent expiration in 2013.

        On December 1996, the PTO informed the Company that the Company's patent application containing a U.S. "Process Manufacturing Claim" was in interference with a patent application of Aventis. In May 1997, the PTO Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences rendered a decision that the Company was first to make the invention. Under the terms of the Agreement, no milestones or royalties are due to the Company until a patent is issued. Under the procedures of the PTO, a patent is not issued until the PTO publishes it. The patent was published in May 1998. Upon the patent publication, the Company was entitled to and did receive the milestone payment for a U.S. "Process Manufacturing Claim." Additionally, the Company is entitled to receive a royalty on worldwide sales of fexofenadine HCl (Allegra and Telfast) from the date of patent issuance until expiration of the patent in 2015.

        In January 1997, the Company was awarded a patent that satisfied the U.S. "Intermediate Process Claim" milestone. In accordance with the terms of the Agreement, the Company received a milestone payment. There are no royalties associated with this patent.

61



        In July 1997, the Company was awarded a New Zealand patent that satisfied the ex-U.S. "Substantially Pure Claim" milestone. In accordance with the terms of the Agreement, the Company received a milestone payment and will receive royalties on all sales of fexofenadine HCl (Telfast) in that country.

        Substantially all of the Company's license, milestone and royalty revenue is derived from milestones and royalties related to its patented fexofenadine HCl technology.

14. Legal Proceedings

        The Company, from time to time, may be involved in various claims and legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. The Company is not currently a party to any such claims or proceedings which, if decided adversely to the Company, would either individually or in the aggregate have a material adverse effect on The Company's business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

        Aventis Pharmaceuticals, the U.S. pharmaceutical business of Aventis S.A., is currently involved in legal proceedings with Barr Laboratories, Inc. regarding an Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) filed by Barr Laboratories with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration seeking authorization to produce and market a generic version of Allegra. Aventis Pharmaceuticals has filed three patent infringement suits against Barr in August and September of 2001 and in January 2002 against Barr alleging infringement of certain U.S. patents related to fexofenadine HCl 60 mg capsules, 30, 60, and 180 mg tablets of fexofenadine HCl, and Allegra-D, an extended-release tablet for oral administration. A trial date has been set for September 2004. In addition, Aventis filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Impax Laboratories in March 2002 after Impax filed an ANDA to produce and market a generic version of Allegra-D. In late 2002 and early 2003, three other generic companies filed ANDAs for Allegra products. Aventis has either brought a patent infringement lawsuit or is evaluating its legal options with respect to these additional filings. In the U.S. Aventis holds multiple method of use, formulation, process and composition patents with respect to Allegra. Under the Company's arrangements with Aventis, the Company will receive royalties until expiration of its underlying patents or until they are earlier determined to be invalid and/or unenforceable. Under applicable federal law, marketing of an FDA-approved generic capsule or tablet at minimum may not commence unless and until a decision favorable to a generic challenger is rendered in the patent litigation or until 30 months have elapsed, whichever comes first. Aventis is taking the lead in preparing and executing a strategy to defend and enforce the intellectual property rights that exist with respect to Allegra.

15. Concentration of Business

        For the years ended December 31, 2000, 2001 and 2002, contract revenue from the Company's three largest customers represented approximately 22%, 13% and 12% for 2000 and 18%, 14% and 10% for 2001 and 12%, 12% and 7% for 2002, of total contract revenue for such years, respectively. In the majority of circumstances, there are agreements in force with these entities that provide for the Company's continued involvement in present research projects. However, there regularly exists the possibility that the Company will have no further association with these entities once these projects conclude.

62



        Contract revenue by geographic region, based on the location of the customer, and expressed as a percentage of total net contract revenue follows:

 
  Year Ended
December 30,

 
 
  2000
  2001
  2002
 
United States   93 % 93 % 93 %
Europe   6   4   4  
Other countries   1   3   3  
   
 
 
 
Total   100 % 100 % 100 %
   
 
 
 

        All significant long-lived assets of the Company are located within the United States.

16. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

        The following disclosure of the estimated fair value of financial instruments is made in accordance with the requirements of SFAS No. 107, Disclosures About Fair Value of Financial Instruments. Although the estimated fair value amounts have been determined by the Company using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies, the estimates presented are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that the Company could realize in current market exchanges.

        The Company is estimating its fair value disclosures for financial instruments using the following methods and assumptions:

        Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments, receivables, and accounts payable: The carrying amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets approximate their fair value because of the short maturities of these instruments.

        Investment securities, available-for-sale:    As disclosed in note 4, investment securities, available-for-sale are estimated based on quoted market prices at the balance sheet date.

        Equity investment in unconsolidated affiliate and subordinated debenture bond from unconsolidated affiliate: The fair value of the Organichem investment is not readily determinable as the company is privately held. At December 31, 2002, management estimates that the fair value of the convertible subordinated debenture from Organichem approximates the carrying value of $15,000.

        Long-term Debt:    The carrying value of long-term debt was approximately $5,726 and $5,496 at December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Management estimates that the fair value of long-term debt was approximately $5,726 and $5,496 at December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively, based upon interest rates available to the Company for issuance of similar debt with similar terms and remaining maturities.

17. Adoption of New Accounting Pronouncements

        Effective January 1, 2002, the Company adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 142 "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets". The following table summarizes what reported net income would have been for all periods presented exclusive of amortization expense

63



recognized in those periods related to goodwill, intangible assets that are no longer being amortized and equity method goodwill.

 
  For the year ended December 31,
 
  2000
  2001
  2002
 
  (in thousands except per share amounts)

Net Income                  
Reported Net Income   $ 23,593   $ 34,394   $ 40,551
Add back: Goodwill amortization     527     1,568    
   
 
 
Adjusted Net Income   $ 24,120   $ 35,962   $ 40,551
   
 
 
Basic earnings per share                  
Reported Net Income   $ 0.78   $ 1.04   $ 1.24
Add back: Goodwill amortization     .08     .05    
   
 
 
Adjusted Net Income   $ .86   $ 1.09   $ 1.24
   
 
 
Diluted earnings per share                  
Reported Net Income   $ 0.74   $ 1.01   $ 1.22
Add back: Goodwill amortization     .02     .05    
   
 
 
Adjusted Net Income   $ .76   $ 1.06   $ 1.22
   
 
 

        The Company is required to perform goodwill impairment tests on an annual basis. In 2002, the Company completed its transition impairment test for goodwill as of January 1, 2002 based on a discounted cash flow method and no impairment charge was required. During the 2002 the Company performed its annual impairment test as of June 30, 2002 as required by SFAS No. 142. The Company's valuation was reviewed by a third party. The results of the valuation and review indicated there was no impairment of the Company's goodwill. However, there can be no assurance that future goodwill impairment tests will not result in a charge to earnings.

        The components of intangible assets are as follows:

 
  Cost
  Accumulated
Amortization

  Net
  Amortization
Period

December 31, 2001                      
Microbial Cultures   $ 4,511   $ 227   $ 4,284   15 years
Patents and Licensing Rights     529     44     485   16 years
   
 
 
   
    $ 5,040   $ 271   $ 4,769    
   
 
 
   
December 31, 2002                      
Microbial Cultures   $ 4,511   $ 454   $ 4,057   15 years
Patents and Licensing Rights     819     72     747   16 years
   
 
 
   
    $ 5,330     526   $ 4,804    
   
 
 
   

64


        Estimated future annual amortization expense related to intangible assets is approximately $270 through the year ended December 31, 2006.

        Effective January 1, 2002, the Company adopted Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) 00-10, "Accounting for Shipping and Handling Fees and Costs," which requires reimbursed expenses such as chemicals and shipping costs to be included both as revenue and cost of goods sold in the income statement. Prior to adoption, the Company included these costs as a reduction of contract revenue. The Adoption of EITF 00-10 had no impact on the Company's operating results but did have the effect of reducing the Company's gross margin percentage. The implementation of EITF 00-10 resulted in additional contract revenues and cost of contract revenues of $2,497, $3,522 and $3,303 for the years ended December 31, 2000, 2001 and 2002, respectively.

18. Subsequent Event (unaudited)

        During the first quarter of 2003 the Company completed the acquisition of Organichem Corporation. On January 1, 2003 the Company exercised its conversion option with respect to $15.0 million of Organichem subordinated debentures. The conversion of the debentures into additional shares of Organichem common stock increased the Company's ownership in Organichem from 39.2% to 75%. On February 12, 2003, the Company purchased the remaining outstanding shares of Organichem for $29.9 million in cash. The purchase price was funded through borrowings under the Company's new five year $30.0 million term loan which matures on February 11, 2008. The term loan bears interest at a variable rate based on the Company's leverage ratio. The Company also refinanced $25.5 million of Organichem's existing bank debt using the Company's new $30.0 million line of credit. The line of credit bears interest at a variable rate based on the Company's leverage ratio. The acquisition will allow the Company to perform large-scale manufacturing of pharmaceutical intermediates and active ingredients.

65


        The following unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet gives effect to the acquisition of Organichem Corporation by Albany Molecular Research, Inc. (AMRI) referred to as if it had occurred on December 31, 2002. The Company has yet to finalize the purchase price allocation.

 
  Pro Forma
Combined

Assets      
Current assets:      
  Cash and cash equivalents   $ 35,051
    Investment securities, available-for-sale     94,699
    Accounts receivable, net     25,265
      Royalty income receivable     13,251
  Inventory     32,161
  Unbilled services     555
  Prepaid Expenses and other current assets     6,424
   
    Total current assets     207,406

Property and equipment, net

 

 

130,292

Other assets

 

 

 
  Goodwill     41,628
  Intangible assets and patents, net     4,804
  Equity investments in unconsolidated affiliates     397
  Other assets     1,520
   
    Total other assets     48,349
   
Total assets   $ 386,047
   
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Current liabilities:      
  Accounts payable and accrued expenses   $ 14,442
  Unearned income     1,116
    Short term debt     18,000
    Current installments of long-term debt     11,770
    Other current liabilities     4,630
   
    Total current liabilities     49,958
Long-term liabilities:      
  Long-term debt and capital leases, excluding current installments     35,281
  Deferred Income taxes     9,856
   
  Other long term liabilities     8,585
   
Total liabilities     103,680
   
Stockholders' equity     282,367
   
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity   $ 386,047
   

66


        The following table summarizes the preliminary allocation of the purchase price to the estimated fair value of the assets acquired at the date of acquisition:

 
   
 
Cash   $ 213  
Accounts receivable     11,693  
Inventory     17,259  
Other current assets     3,648  
Property and equipment     57,774  
Other assets     595  
   
 
  Total assets     91, 182  
Accounts payable and other accrued expenses     10,688  
Long-term debt     44,085  
Deferred tax liabilities     5,008  
Other liabilities     6,385  
   
 
  Total liabilities     66,151  
   
 
  Net assets acquired     25,031  
Purchase price adjustments:        
  Inventory     1,500  
  Accrued liabilities     (2,160 )
   
 
  Adjusted net assets acquired     24,371  
  Cumulative purchase price     48,818  
   
 
  Goodwill   $ 24,447  
   
 

67


18. Selected Quarterly Consolidated Financial Data (unaudited)

      The following tables present unaudited consolidated financial data for each quarter of 2000, 2001 and 2002

 
  First
Quarter

  Second
Quarter

  Third
Quarter

  Fourth
Quarter

2000                        
Contract revenue   $ 8,326   $ 9,450   $ 10,481   $ 11,617
Gross profit     3,447     3,896     4,384     4,791
Milestones and royalties     5,680     7,744     7,469     8,333
Income from operations     6,240     8,431     8,650     9,102
Net income     4,418     5,862     5,826     7,486
Net income per share:                        
  Basic   $ 0.15   $ 0.20   $ 0.20   $ 0.23
Diluted   $ 0.14   $ 0.19   $ 0.19   $ 0.22

2001

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Contract revenue   $ 13,305   $ 14,724   $ 15,358   $ 16,947
Gross profit     5,505     6,092     6,565     7,226
Milestones and royalties     8,760     10,648     9,918     12,349
Income from operations     9,889     11,764     11,407     13,354
Net income     7,745     8,868     8,480     9,301
Net income per share:                        
  Basic   $ 0.24   $ 0.27   $ 0.26   $ 0.27
  Diluted   $ 0.23   $ 0.26   $ 0.25   $ 0.27

2002

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Contract revenue   $ 16,680   $ 17,756   $ 19,015   $ 18,237
Gross profit     7,105     7,478     8,122     7,670
Milestones and royalties     10,725     14,075     13,061     13,278
Income from operations     12,081     14,800     14,620     14,913
Net income     8,768     10,560     10,211     11,012
Net income per share:                        
  Basic   $ 0.26   $ 0.32   $ 0.32   $ 0.34
  Diluted   $ 0.26   $ 0.32   $ 0.31   $ 0.33

        Contract revenue and gross profit have been restated to reflect the impact of EITF 00-10 as discusssed in Note 17.

68



ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.

        The information appearing under the captions "Independent Accountants" in the Company's definitive proxy statement relating to the annual meeting of stockholders to be held May 21, 2003 is incorporated herein by reference.


PART III


ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT.

        The information appearing under the captions "Directors and Executive Officers" and "Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance" in the Company's definitive proxy statement relating to the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 21, 2003 is incorporated herein by reference.


ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

        The information appearing under the captions "Executive Compensation—Summary Compensation,—Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation, and—Agreements with Named Executive Officers," and "Information Regarding Directors—The Board of Directors and its Committees" in the Company's definitive proxy statement relating to the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 21, 2003 is incorporated herein by reference.


ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT.

        The information appearing under the caption "Principal and Management Stockholders" in the Company's definitive proxy statement relating to the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 21, 2003 is incorporated herein by reference.

Equity Compensation Plan Information—The following table provides information about the securities authorized for issuance under the Company's equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2002:

 
  (a)

  (b)

  (c)

 
Plan Category

  Number of securities to be
issued upon exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants
and rights

  Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights

  Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation
plans (excluding
securities reflected in
column (a)

 
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(1)   2,448 (2) $ 20.13   2,567 (3)
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders          
   
 
     
Total   2,448   $ 20.13   2,567  
   
 
     

(1)
Consists of the Stock Option Plan and the Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP).

(2)
Does not include purchase rights accruing under the ESPP because the purchase price (and therefore the number of shares to be purchased) will not be determined until the end of the purchase period.

(3)
Includes shares available for future issuance under the ESPP and Stock Option Plan.

69



ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS.

        The information appearing under the caption "Certain Transactions" in the Company's definitive proxy statement relating to the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 21, 2003 is incorporated herein by reference.


ITEM 14, CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

        As required by new rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, within 90 days prior to the date of this report, we carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, we and our management recognize that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives and our management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating and implementing possible controls and procedures. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that they believe that, as of the date of completion of the evaluation, our disclosure controls and procedures were reasonably effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms. In connection with the new rules, we will continue to review and document our disclosure controls and procedures, including our internal controls and procedures for financial reporting, on an ongoing basis, and may from time to time make changes aimed at enhancing their effectiveness and to ensure that our systems evolve with our business.

        None.

ITEM 15. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

        The information appearing under the caption "Audit Fees" in the Company's definitive proxy statement relating to the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 21, 2003 is incorporated herein by reference.


PART IV

ITEM 16. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K.

(1)
Financial Statements

        The consolidated financial statements and notes are listed under Part II, Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

        Index to Consolidated Financial Statements.

70


(2)
Financial Statement Schedules

        The following financial schedule of Albany Molecular Research, Inc. is included in this annual report on Form 10-K.

Schedule II—Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

        Schedules other than that which is listed above have been omitted since they are either not required, are not applicable, or the required information is shown in the consolidated financial statements or related notes.

(3)
Exhibits

        Exhibits are as set forth in the "Index to Exhibits" which follows the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements and immediately precedes the exhibits filed.



        None.

        The Company hereby files as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K the Exhibits listed in the attached Exhibit Index on pages 75 through 77 of this Annual Report.

        The Company hereby files as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K the financial statement schedule listed in Item 16(a)(2) set forth above.

71



SIGNATURES

        Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

    ALBANY MOLECULAR RESEARCH, INC.

DATED: MARCH 31, 2003

 

By:

 

    /s/ Thomas E. D'Ambra

Thomas E. D'Ambra, Ph.D.
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and Director

        Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature
  Title
  Date

 

 

 

 

 
    /s/ Thomas E. D'Ambra
Thomas E. D'Ambra, Ph.D.
  Chairman of the Board, Chief
Executive Officer, President and Director (Principal Executive Officer)
      March 31, 2003

    /s/ David P. Waldek

David P. Waldek

 

Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer
and Secretary (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

 

    March 31, 2003


    /s/ Donald E. Kuhla

Donald E. Kuhla, Ph.D.

 

Executive Vice President and Director

 

    March 31, 2003


    /s/ Paul S. Anderson

Paul S. Anderson, Ph.D.

 

Director

 

    March 31, 2003


    /s/ Frank W. Haydu

Frank W. Haydu, III

 

Director

 

    March 31, 2003


    /s/ Kevin O'Connor

Kevin O'Connor

 

Director

 

    March 31, 2003


    /s/ Anthony M. Tartaglia

Anthony M. Tartaglia, M.D.

 

Director

 

    March 31, 2003

72


I, David P. Waldek, certify that:

1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Albany Molecular Research, Inc.;

2.
Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.
The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report being prepared;

b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date with 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)
Presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
5.
The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)
All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and
6.
The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date or our most recent evaluation, including any corrective action s with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: March 31, 2003 /s/  DAVID P. WALDEK      
Name: David P. Waldek
Title: Chief Financial Officer,
Treasurer and Secretary

73


I, Thomas E. D'Ambra, Ph.D., certify that:

1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Albany Molecular Research, Inc.;

2.
Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.
The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report being prepared;

b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date with 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)
Presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
5.
The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)
All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and
6.
The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date or our most recent evaluation, including any corrective action s with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: March 31, 2003 /s/  THOMAS E. D'AMBRA      
Name: Thomas E. D'Ambra, Ph.D.
Title: Chief Executive Officer,
President and Director

74



ALBANY MOLECULAR RESEARCH, INC.
SCHEDULE II—VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
Years Ended December 31, 2000, December 31, 2001 and December 31, 2002

Description

  Balance at
Beginning of
Period

  Charged to Cost
and Expenses

  Charged to Other
Accounts

  Deductions
Charged to
Reserves

  Balance at
End of
Period

Allowance for doubtful accounts                              
  2000   $ 110,000               $ 110,000
  2001   $ 110,000   $ 200,000       $ (92,000 ) $ 218,000
  2002   $ 218,000               $ 218,000

Note receivable reserve

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
  2000   $ 84,000           $ (43,723 ) $ 40,277
  2001   $ 40,277               $ 40,277
  2002   $ 40,277       $ (8,000 )       $ 32,277

75



EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit
No.

  Description


  2.1

 

Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of December 19, 2000, by and between the Company and NCE Acquisition Corp., New Chemical Entities, Inc. and Certain Stockholders Thereof (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 25, 2000, File No. 000-25323).

  2.2

 

Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of December 21, 1999 by and among the Company, Organichem Corporation and the other parties named therein (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 21, 1999, File No. 000-25323).

  2.3

 

Debenture Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 21, 1999, by and among the Company and Organichem Corporation (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K/A dated December 21, 1999 and filed on January 5, 2000, File No. 000-25323).

  3.1

 

Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998, File No. 000-25323).

  3.2

 

Amended and Restated By-Laws of the Company (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998, File No. 000-25323).

  4.1

 

Specimen certificate for shares of Common Stock, $0.01 par value, of the Company (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Amendment No. 3 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-58795) ).

10.1

 

Lease dated as of October 9, 1992, as amended, by and between the Company and Hoffman Enterprises (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Amendment No. 3 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-58795)).

10.2

 

1998 Stock Option and Incentive Plan of the Company (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Amendment No. 3 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-58795)).

10.3

 

Amended and Restated 1992 Stock Option Plan of the Company (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Amendment No. 2 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-58795)).

10.4

 

1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of the Company (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Amendment No. 2 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-58795)).

10.5

 

Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Company and each of its directors (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Amendment No. 2 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-58795) ).

10.6

 

License Agreement dated March 15, 1995 by and between the Company and Marion Merrell Dow Inc. (now Aventis, S.A.) (excluding certain portions which have been omitted as indicated based upon an order for confidential treatment, but which have been filed separately with the Commission) (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to Amendment No. 3 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-58795)).

 

 

 


10.7

 

Principles of Cooperation Between Albany Molecular Research and Cambrex Corporation dated February 1, 1997 by and between the Company and Cambrex Corporation (excluding certain portions which have been omitted as indicated based upon an order for confidential treatment, but which have been filed separately with the Commission) (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to Amendment No. 3 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S- 1 (File No. 333-58795) ).

10.8

 

Agreement dated December 16, 1997 by and between the Company and Eli Lilly and Company (excluding certain portions which have been omitted as indicated based upon an order for confidential treatment, but which have been filed separately with the Commission) (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to Amendment No. 3 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-58795)).

10.9

 

Technology Development Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to Amendment No. 2 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-58795)).

10.10

 

Employment Agreement between the Company and Thomas E. D'Ambra, Ph.D. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998, File No. 000-25323).

10.11

 

Employment Agreement between the Company and Harold Meckler, Ph.D. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998, File No. 000-25323).

10.12

 

Employment Agreement between the Company and Michael P. Trova, Ph.D. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998, File No. 000-25323).

10.13

 

Form of Employee Innovation, Proprietary Information and Post-Employment Activity Agreement between the Company and each of its executive officers (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to Amendment No. 3 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-58795)).

10.15

 

Employment Agreement between the Company and Donald E. Kuhla, Ph.D. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998, File No. 000-25323).

10.16

 

Employment Agreement between the Company and Lawrence D. Jones, Ph.D. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998, File No. 000-25323).

10.17

 

Employment Agreement between the Company and David P. Waldek (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998, File No. 000-25323).

10.18

 

Employment Agreement between the Company and James J. Grates (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999, File No. 000-25323).

10.19

 

Loan Agreement, dated as of June 29, 1998, by and between the Company and Fleet National Bank (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999, File No. 000-25323).

10.20

 

Amendment to Agreements, dated as of February 8, 1999, by and between the Company and Fleet National Bank (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999, File No. 000-25323).

 

 

 


10.21

 

Restated and Revised Lease Agreement, dated as of December 1, 1999, between the University at Albany Foundation and the Company (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999, File No. 000-25323).

10.22

 

Amended and Restated Technology Development Incentive Plan (confidential treatment has been requested as to certain portions of this Exhibit).

21.1

 

Subsidiaries of the Company (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 21.1 to Amendment No. 2 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-58795)).

23.1

 

Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (filed herewith).

23.2

 

The description of the Company's Rights to purchase shares of the Company's Series A Junior Participating Cumulative Preferred Stock contained in the Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 19, 2002.



QuickLinks

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
ALBANY MOLECULAR RESEARCH, INC. INDEX TO ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
PART I
PART II
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ALBANY MOLECULAR RESEARCH, INC.
Report of Independent Accountants
ALBANY MOLECULAR RESEARCH, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME Years Ended December 31, 2000, 2001 and 2002 (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
ALBANY MOLECULAR RESEARCH, INC. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS December 31, 2001 and 2002 (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
ALBANY MOLECULAR RESEARCH, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS Years Ended December 31, 2000, 2001 and 2002 (In thousands)
ALBANY MOLECULAR RESEARCH, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2000, 2001 and 2002 (In thousands, except per share amounts)
PART III
PART IV
SIGNATURES
ALBANY MOLECULAR RESEARCH, INC. SCHEDULE II—VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS Years Ended December 31, 2000, December 31, 2001 and December 31, 2002
EXHIBIT INDEX